UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.20549
 
FORM 10-K
 (Mark One)
(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission file numberFile Number 001-34221

 
The Providence Service Corporation
ModivCare Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

Delaware86-0845127
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
700 Canal Street, Third Floor, Stamford, CT
(Address of principal executive offices)
86-0845127
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
06902
(Zip code)
4700 South Syracuse Street, Suite 440, Denver, Colorado80237
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code) 
(303) 728-7043
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 307-2800code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each Class
class
Trading Symbol(s)Name of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
MODV
The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes   No
 



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐  Yes ☒  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒  Yes ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405Rule-405 of Regulation S-TRegulation-S-T 232.405223.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months12-months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒  Yes   ☐   No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B)13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act.


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates based oncomputed by reference to the closing price for suchat which the common equity as reportedwas last sold on The NASDAQ Global Select Market onas of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2017) was $576.8$950.0 million.

As of March 5, 2018,February 22, 2021, there were 14,190,540 shares outstanding 12,866,551 shares (excluding treasury shares of 4,656,738)5,140,456) of the registrant’s Common Stock,common stock, $0.001 par value per share.

 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

All or a portion of Items 10 through 14 inThe following documents are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are incorporated by reference to our10-K: the registrant’s definitive proxy statement onto be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under cover of Schedule 14A for our 2018 stockholder meeting;with respect to the registrant’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that if such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,2021, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.



2


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page No.
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5. 
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8. 
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13. 
Item 14.  
PART IV
Item 15. 
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.



3


Part I
 
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words the “Company”, the “registrant”, “we”, “our”, “us”, “Providence”“ModivCare” and similar terms refer to The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc. and, except as otherwise specified herein, to ourits consolidated subsidiaries. When such terms are used in reference to the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, (theor our “Common Stock)Stock”, we are referring specifically and only to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), they refer specifically to The Providence Service Corporation.capital stock of ModivCare Inc.
 
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder, including statements related to the Company’s strategies or expectations about revenues, liabilities, results of operations, cash flows, ability to fund operations, profitability, ability to meet financial covenants, contracts or market opportunities. The Company may also make forward-looking statements in other reports and statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in materials delivered to stockholders and in press releases. In addition, the Company’s representatives may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. In certainmany cases, you may identify forward looking-statements by words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expect”, “plan”, “project”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “forecast”, “likely”, the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. In addition, statements that are not historical statements of fact should also be considered forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about its business and industry, and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risksThe factors included below under the caption “Summary Risk Factors” and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks described in further detail below under Item 1A 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K are included among such risks and uncertainties.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.made and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth herein. The Company is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) update any of the information in any forward-looking statement if such forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable law. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

SUMMARY RISK FACTORS

An investment in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. If any of the factors listed below and described in more detail with the other identified risk factors included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” under Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose some or all of your investment. Some of the most material risks relating to an investment in our common stock include the impact or effect on our Company and its operating results, or its investors, of:

Risks Related to Our Industry

government or private insurance program funding reductions or limitations;
alternative payment models or the transition of Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries to Managed Care Organizations, or MCOs;
our inability to control reimbursement rates received for our services;
cost containment initiatives undertaken by private third-party payors;
the effects of a public health emergency; and
inadequacies in, or security breaches of, our information technology systems, including the systems intended to protect our clients’ privacy and confidential information;

Risks Related to Our Business

any changes in the funding, financial viability or our relationships with our payors;
pandemic infectious diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
disruptions to our contact center operations caused by health epidemics or pandemics like COVID-19;
4


delays in collection, or non-collection, of our accounts receivable, particularly during any business integration;
an impairment of our long-lived assets;
any failure to maintain or to develop further reliable, efficient and secure information technology systems;
an inability to attract and retain qualified employees;
any acquisition or acquisition integration efforts; and
estimated income taxes being different from income taxes that we ultimately pay;

Risks Related to Our NEMT Segment

our contracts not surviving until the end of their stated terms, or not being renewed or extended;
our failure to compete effectively in the marketplace;
our not being awarded contracts through the government’s requests for proposals process, or our awarded contracts not being profitable;
any failure to satisfy our contractual obligations or to maintain existing pledged performance and payment bonds;
a failure to estimate accurately the cost of performing our contracts;
any misclassification of the drivers we engage as independent contractors rather than as employees; and
significant interruptions in our communication and data services;

Risks Related to Our Personal Care Segment

not successfully executing on our strategies in the face of our competition;
any inability to maintain relationships with existing patient referral sources;
certificates of need, or CON, laws or other regulatory and licensure obligations that may adversely affect our personal care integration efforts and expansion into new markets;
any failure to obtain the consent of the New York Department of Health to manage the day to day operations of our licensed in-home personal care services agency business that we acquired with our Personal Care Segment;
acquired unknown liabilities in connection with the acquisition of our Personal Care Segment;
changes in the case-mix of our personal care patients, or changes in payor mix or payment methodologies;
our loss of existing favorable managed care contracts;
our experiencing shortages in qualified employees and management;
labor disputes or disruptions, in particular in New York; and
becoming subject to malpractice or other similar claims;

Risks Related to Our Matrix Investment Segment

our lack of sole decision-making authority with respect to our minority investment in Matrix;

Risks Related to Governmental Regulations

the cost of our compliance or non-compliance with existing laws;
changes to the regulatory landscape applicable to our businesses;
changes in budgetary priorities of the government entities or private insurance programs that fund our services;
regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information;
actions for false claims or recoupment of funds;
civil penalties or loss of business for failing to comply with bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with public organizations;
changes to, or violations of, licensing regulations, including regulations governing surveys and audits; and
our contracts being subject to audit and modification by the payors with whom we contract, at their sole discretion;

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

our existing debt agreements containing restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business;
our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations;
any expiration of our existing Credit Agreement (as defined below) or loss of available financing alternatives; and
our ability to incur substantial additional indebtedness;

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

future sales of shares of our common stock by existing stockholders;
5


our stock price volatility;
our dependence on our subsidiaries to fund our operations and expenses;
securities analysts failing to publish research or publishing misleading or unfavorable research about us; and
anti-takeover provisions could discourage a change of control of our company and affect the trading price of our stock.

The foregoing risk factors are not necessarily all of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from expectations. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. Investors and other interested parties are encouraged to read the information included under the section captioned “Risk Factors” below, which describes other risk factors not summarized above, in its entirety before making an investment decision about our securities.

Item 1.Business.
 
Item 1.
Business.
BackgroundOverview
 
The Providence Service Corporation owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged in the provision ofModivCare Inc. is a technology-enabled, healthcare services incompany, which provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and private payors and their patients. Its value-based solutions address the United StatesSocial Determinants of Health, or SDoH, enable greater access to care, reduce costs, and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which we hold interests comprise the following segments:

Non-Emergency Transportation Services (“NET Services”) – Nationwide managerimprove outcomes. ModivCare is a leading provider of non-emergency medical transportation, (“NET”) programs for state governmentsor NEMT, personal and managedhome care, organizations.and nutritional meal delivery. Our technology-enabled operating model includes NEMT core competencies in risk underwriting, contact center management, network credentialing, claims management and non-emergency medical transport management. The Company also partners with communities throughout the country, providing food-insecure individuals delivery of nutritional meals. Additionally, its personal and home care services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting, including senior citizens and disabled adults.
Workforce Development Services (“WD Services”) – Global provider
ModivCare’s solutions help health plans manage risks, close care gaps, reduce costs, and connect members to care. With the combination of employment preparationits historical NEMT business with its in-home personal care business that was previously operated by Simplura Health Group, as described further below, ModivCare has united two complementary healthcare companies that serve similar, highly vulnerable patient populations. Collectively, ModivCare is uniquely positioned to remove the barriers of health inequities and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.address the SDoH.
Matrix Investment – Minority
ModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, (“Matrix”),which operates under the Matrix Medical Network brand and which we refer to as “Matrix”. Matrix maintains a nationwide providernational network of community-based clinicians who deliver in-home care optimization and management solutions, including comprehensive health assessments (“CHAs”), to memberson-site services, and a fleet of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018, Matrix acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments,clinics that provide community-based care with advanced diagnostic testing,capabilities and additionalenhanced care optimization services.options. Matrix’s Clinical Care provides risk adjustment solutions that improve health outcomes for individuals and financial performance for health plans. Matrix’s Clinical Solutions provides employee health and wellness services focused on improving employee health with worksite certification solutions that reinforce business resilience and safe return-to-work outcomes. It’s Clinical Solutions also provides clinical trial services which support the delivery of safe and effective clinical trial operations by going where the patients are and ensuring all eligible volunteers, including those with barriers to healthcare access.

In addition to its segments’ operations, the Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions and the results of the Company’s captive insurance company. We are actively monitoring these activities as they relate to our capital allocation and acquisition strategy to ensure alignment with Providence’s overall strategic objectives and its goal of enhancing shareholder value.Our Development

The CompanyModivCare Inc. is a Delaware corporation that was formed in 1996 and headquarteredwhich recently announced its name change and rebranding from its original name: The Providence Service Corporation. The Company completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of its common stock in Stamford, Connecticut.August 2003 and its shares have been listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market, or NASDAQ, since its IPO. ModivCare’s shares of common stock currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “MODV”; prior to its name change, its shares traded on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “PRSC”.



Business Strategies

Our businesses are operated on a decentralized basis and do not share any integrated functions such as sales, marketing, purchasing, human resources, accounting, finance or legal. They pursue strategies reflective of their respective industries and operating models. Our segments’ core competencies include developing and managing large provider networks, tailoring healthcare and workforce development service offerings toModivCare has grown its business since its IPO into the unique needs of diverse communities and populations, and implementing technology-enabled delivery models to achieve superior outcomes in low cost settings. We pursue bothcompany it is today through organic and inorganic growth through entry into adjacent markets and complementary service lines, particularly with offerings that may leverage the advantages inherent in our large-scale, technology-enabled, networks. In particular, as it relates to inorganic growth, we are actively evaluating the optimal industry sectors, such as the non-emergency medical transportation industry and others in which businesses complementary to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our merger and acquisition activity. This ongoing evaluation takes into consideration and balances a number of factors, including the strategic goals, competitive landscape, and growth opportunities of our current segments, in an attempt to direct our capital towards those areas of our business most likely to drive long-term value creation and generate the highest levels of return for our shareholders. We also may enter into strategic partnerships or dispose of businesses, as demonstrated by the Matrix Transaction (defined below) and the Human Services Sale (defined below), based on a variety of factors, including availability of alternative opportunities to deploy capital or otherwise maximize shareholder value as well as other strategic considerations. The outcomea series of acquisitions and divestitures of companies operating primarily in related, or tangentially related, industries, as follows with respect to our continuing operations:

In December 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Charter LCI Corporation, the parent company of LogistiCare, Inc. (now ModivCare Solutions, LLC), which formed the foundation of our active evaluationNEMT business and NEMT Segment operations, for cash and 418,952 shares of our common stock totaling approximately $220.0 million;
In October 2014, we acquired all of the optimal industry sectors around which to focus our mergeroutstanding equity of Matrix for cash and acquisition activity as well as the potential future entry into strategic partnerships or potential disposition of businesses may impact the extentcommon stock totaling approximately $390.7 million, and mannersubsequently in which we deploy resources across Providence, including strategic and administrative resources between Corporate and Other and our operating segments.
Discontinued Operations

On October 19, 2016, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners purchased(Frazier) obtained a controlling equity53.2% majority interest in Matrix through a stock subscription, and we received a distribution from Matrix totaling approximately $381.2 million;
6


In September 2018, we acquired all of the outstanding equity not already owned by us of Circulation, Inc., which extended our business to include an NEMT technology platform that allows for real time notifications to members on their mobile devices, integration with Providence retaining a noncontrollingwide variety of advanced traffic management systems, or ATMS, and transportation network companies, real time ride tracking, network management and analytics, for cash totaling approximately $45.1 million;
In May 2020, we acquired all of the outstanding equity interest (the “Matrix Transaction”). Matrix’s financial results priorof National MedTrans, LLC, or NMT, which expanded our NEMT business to include more than five million trips to its approximately two million members on behalf of state Medicaid agencies and MCOs across 12 states, for cash totaling approximately $80.0 million;
In November 2020, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of OEP AM, Inc., a Delaware corporation doing business as Simplura Health Group, or Simplura, which formed the foundation of our personal care business and Personal Care Segment operations, for cash totaling approximately $575.0 million subject to certain customary adjustments; and

as follows with respect to our recently discontinued operations:

In November 2015, we sold to Molina Healthcare, Inc. our operations comprising our former human services segment, which provided counselors, social workers and behavioral health professionals to work with clients, primarily in the clients’ homes or communities, who were eligible for government assistance due to income level, disabilities or court order, for cash totaling approximately $200.0 million; and
In three separate transactions effected in October 19, 20162017, July 2018 and December 2018, we ultimately sold to three separate and unaffiliated entities substantially all of our operations comprising our former workforce development services, or WD Services, segment, which provided workforce development services to long-term unemployed, disabled, and unskilled individuals, as well as individuals coping with medical illnesses and those that had been released from incarceration, for cash totaling approximately $15.8 million, a de minimus amount, and $46.5 million, respectively (any operations remaining after these acquisitions have been assumed by other parties or have been discontinued and are presented as a discontinued operation. being wound down).

In addition on November 1, 2015,to the acquisition and divestiture activities described above, the Company:

In May 2017, ceased reinsuring through its wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company, or SPCIC, its automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs;
In January 2019, completed an organizational consolidation in which it closed its corporate offices in Stamford, Connecticut and Tucson, Arizona, and consolidated all activities and functions performed at the corporate holding company level into its NEMT Segment, which we refer to as our Organizational Consolidation;
In June and September 2020, effected a series of transactions pursuant to an agreement with Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P. and/or funds and accounts managed by Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Coliseum Stockholders”) in which (1) the Company completed its salerepurchased approximately half of the Human Services Segment (the “Human Services Sale”shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Coliseum Stockholders, and (2) the Coliseum Stockholders converted the remaining portion of their holdings of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into Common Stock for aggregate consideration of $88.7 million; following the September repurchase of the Coliseum Stockholders’ remaining shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company elected to convert all shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by holders other than the Coliseum Stockholders into Common Stock, with the result that we currently have outstanding equity composed only of Common Stock;
In May and October 2020, further amended its amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement, dated as of August 2, 2013 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), to, among other things, increase to $225.0 million the revolving credit limit under the Credit Agreement, permit the issuance of our Notes (as described immediately below), and extend the maturity date of the Credit Agreement to August 2, 2023;
In November 2020, issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due in November 2025, which we refer to as our Notes, the net proceeds from which were used to finance a portion of the purchase price paid in the Simplura acquisition; and
In December 2020, formed with an industry counterpart a protected series (90% of which is owned by us and which we refer to herein as our insurance captive) of a captive insurance company, NEMT Insurance DE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that has been organized subject to the Delaware Revised Captive Insurance Company Act, which has been established to provide an insurance coverage alternative for transportation providers who are finding it increasingly difficult to obtain required automobile insurance in connection with their NEMT services on terms acceptable to them, or at all.

Our Strategies

7


Six pillars fuel and align the six key strategies for our business. Our pillars support our foundation and the strategies that we have established to build shareholder value and guide our operations, product and service delivery model, and ultimate success with our customers and members.

Right People in the Right Seats – ensuring that each person is in the role that best fits the person’s skills and capabilities
Voice of the Customer – creating a best-in-class experience for our customers and members
Transformational Growth – growing to be one of the nation’s preeminent SDoH companies
Single Repeatable Model – standardizing and being more customer-centric across each contact center
Enhanced Technology Platform – rollout of in-demand product that brings the best capabilities of our technology platform
Rebranding – defining our company’s mission, vision, and values and tying them to our external and internal brand

Utilizing these six pillars as guiding principles, our mission is to provide effective and quality services and logistics and to create shareholder value by pursuing and implementing the following key strategies.

Centers of Excellence – Operations and Local Focus

Our operational structure includes six centers of excellence, or COEs, that are designed to enhance the visibility, flexibility and control we have over our operations. These COEs are:

Transportation Network, which is accountedfocused on increases to capacity and improvements to quality designed to reduce cost and enhance the member experience;
Contact Center Operations, which is aimed at improving employee productivity through activities such as contact center workflow standardization, cross training and intensive operations management;
Client Services, which is focused on local operations and holistic approaches to our customers and client retention;
Technology, which is focused on the support of operations and development of proprietary technology to elevate the member experience and differentiate our product;
Growth, which is focused on sales, marketing and business development; and
Process Improvement, which is designed to support all of our other COEs in the pursuit of effective and efficient operations.

In addition to the COE oversight structure, we have implemented controls and procedures at the local level to better manage costs and our transportation network. We believe this structure positions us for effective scalability of our business model while also ensuring that the nuances of local activity are taken into account in controlling costs, which when combined, provide us with a competitive advantage.

Technology Transformation

In August 2020, we launched a new front-end member technology platform in targeted markets that is intended to leverage rider benefits on the front-end with all of the payor benefits, including reporting, on the back-end. We expect this technology platform will reduce inbound calls from members looking for assistance on the location of the transportation provider, improve on-time percentages and enhance member satisfaction. Specifically, we believe this new front-end platform will provide revenue growth and also the following additional benefits:

member communications through texting, email and automated calls, including the ability for the member to see the location of the transportation provider in real time on a mobile device;
proactive management for rejected, canceled and late rides; and
driver application enhancements for transportation providers.

Customer and Member Satisfaction

Transportation related to care is one of the most impactful experiences contributing to our clients’, members’ and patients’ satisfaction during their care encounter. At the core of our operational and technology strategies is a focus on driving client and member satisfaction. With respect to our Personal Care Segment, process improvements, augmented by technology, are expected to help reduce costs while maintaining quality patient care. In addition, we strive to become the employer of choice in each of our Personal Care Segment markets. Our scale and density in these markets allow us to provide the number of weekly work hours our caregivers desire, which gives us a competitive advantage in recruiting and retention of caregivers that might otherwise need to work for several agencies to obtain the desired number of work-hours. More generally, our COE operational structure allows us to develop locally tailored network solutions with a higher level of visibility. Greater access to
8


real time information, enabled through our technology, provides us the ability to shorten cycle times to identify and resolve client and member issues.

Organic Growth

NEMT Segment. Across the healthcare market, we see an increasing understanding of the benefit of removing transportation as a discontinued operationbarrier to care and a way to improve other determinants of health, such as access to food, shelter, socialization, and pharmacy. We believe that our scale, deep experience, operational strategy, and technology uniquely position us to address customer needs related to transportation of vulnerable populations. We approach sales, marketing and business development in a manner that is focused on driving market share in our core Medicaid market, including states and MCOs, Medicare Advantage, or MA, plans, health systems and providers. Simultaneously, we target business development efforts with partners to enter new transportation markets, including the movement of home health providers, pharmacy delivery and beneficiaries of workers compensation. We expect there will be network effects as we serve more and more healthcare constituencies within a geography.

Personal Care Segment. We intend to continue to grow in our existing markets for all periods presented.personal care services by:


Descriptionenhancing the breadth of our services;
increasing the number of referral sources;
leveraging and expanding existing payor and referral source relationships; and
opening de novo sites where appropriate.

Our Segments

The Company operatesbusiness development activities in two principal business segments, NET Servicesthis area include community outreach in each of our markets, where we educate referral sources about the benefits of personal care services and WD Services.the programs available to patients. We believe that demographic trends such as an aging population and longer life expectancies will increase the size of our addressable market, and that the demand for in-home personal care will further increase because it is the lowest cost setting and therefore preferred by payors and also by patients, who also tend to prefer their own homes over institutional settings. We also believe that the carve-in of personal care into MA provides further opportunity for organic growth. As one of the largest platforms providing in-home personal care, we differentiate our services by providing broad geographic coverage in both urban and rural areas and the capability to offer a broad suite of services and manage complex cases involving high-needs patients. In addition, Providence holdswe are working with MCOs and other payors to lower overall cost of care and improve outcomes by managing risk factors, such as falls, and using technology solutions to provide early indicators of change in condition to avoid hospitalization. With these capabilities, we strive to be the provider of choice for in-home personal care services and intend to continue differentiating our services from the competition and winning market share by relying on strong regional leadership, clinical capabilities, qualified and well-trained caregivers and investment in technology.

Inorganic Growth

NEMT Segment. We closely follow our core NEMT market and expansion markets mentioned above. We believe our experience, relationships in the industry, scale and executive team strongly position us to be a noncontrolling interestconsolidator in Matrix,healthcare transportation. Our acquisition strategy may include an evaluation of new entrants, which may not be able to otherwise compete without the benefits of scale and experience, and closely-held businesses that may seek a new capital structure or sale to achieve liquidity for founders. With our balance sheet, strong team and track record, we believe we are a natural consolidator.

Personal Care Segment. We believe there is a reportable segmentsignificant opportunity for financial reporting purposes (the “Matrix Investment”). Financial information about segmentscontinued growth through acquisition in both new and existing personal care services markets. The personal care services industry is highly fragmented, and smaller competitors are finding it increasingly difficult to compete as payors look to narrow their provider networks and contract with providers of scale that can offer a wide breadth of services and capabilities across a broad geographic areas, including revenues, operating income (loss),area. Moreover, smaller competitors may not have the capital to invest in technology and long-lived assets of each segment, is includedlack the market density to attract caregivers. We will continue to explore opportunities to acquire regional providers to enter into new markets, and tuck-in acquisitions to grow our presence in Note 21, Segments,existing markets, as well as to branch out into adjacent businesses.

Smart Capital Allocation

Our NEMT Segment has historically generated positive cash flows, our Personal Care Segment has experienced consistent growth, a strong free cash flow profile, and maintains an asset-light model similar to our consolidated financial statementsNEMT Segment, and is incorporated herein by reference. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, for a discussion of risks relatedour combined balance sheet provides us with optionality with respect to capital allocation and how we can best deliver shareholder value. We will continue to focus on operational efficiencies, invest in our operations, and investments.seek to enhance our technical capabilities through technological initiatives in an effort to enhance our client and member experience. In respect of our
9


Personal Care Segment, we are committed to maintaining and improving the quality of our patient care by dedicating appropriate resources at each site and continuing to refine our clinical and non-clinical initiatives and objectives. We are implementing technology enhancements and service protocols intended to promote best practices, enhance the patient experience, and improve the operating effectiveness and efficiency of our case management, training, staffing, scheduling and labor management. We will also continue to assess the opportunities for capital deployment in order to create value for shareholders, which may include dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions.

Our Operations

We are a technology-enabled, healthcare services company that is the nation’s largest manager of NEMT programs for state governments and MCOs, and also a leading in-home personal care services provider in the seven eastern states where we provide those services. Our core competencies in NEMT include contact center management, network credentialing, claims management and non-emergency medical transport management. Our in-home personal care services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting, including senior citizens and disabled adults.

By offering our suite of integrated supportive care solutions for our payor customers and members, we are focused on becoming among the nation’s preeminent SDoH companies. We report our operations as described above under three separate business segments: NEMT; Personal Care; and Matrix, each of which is described below in greater detail following the next subsection captioned “Business Trends”.

Business Trends

Our performance is affected by a number of trends that drive the demand for our services. In particular, the markets in which we operate are exposed to various trends, such as healthcare industry and demographic dynamics. Over the long term, we believe there are numerous factors that could affect growth within the industries in which we operate, including:

an aging population, which is expected to increase demand for healthcare services and transportation and, accordingly, in-home personal care services;
a movement towards value-based versus fee-for-service and cost plus, or FFS, care and budget pressure on governments, both of which may increase the use of private corporations to provide necessary and innovative services;
increasing demand for in-home care provision, driven by cost pressures on traditional reimbursement models and technological advances enabling remote engagement, including telehealth services;
technological advancements, which may be utilized by us to improve services and lower costs, but may also be utilized by others, which may increase industry competitiveness; and
MCO, Medicaid and Medicare plans increasingly are covering NEMT services for a variety of reasons, including increased access to care, improved patient compliance with treatment plans, social trends, and to promote social determinants of health, and this trend may be accelerated or reinforced by President Trump's recent signing into law of The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 ("H.R.133"), a component of which mandates that state Medicaid programs ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to and from health care providers.

We estimate the overall size of the U.S. NEMT Medicaid market, in terms of annual spend, to be approximately $4.3 billion. Each year, approximately 5.8 million Medicaid members are estimated to miss out on medical care due to lack of transportation. NEMT solutions enable access to care that not only improves the quality of life and health of the patients receiving services, but also enable many of the individuals to pursue independent living in their homes rather than in more expensive institutional care settings. In addition, studies have shown that missed medical appointments lessen patient compliance with clinical guidelines and lead to increased complications and expensive medical services. Moreover, preventive care has proven to lower the cost of overall care by avoiding potentially more serious, costly emergent services later. NEMT providers also cater to individuals with specialized transportation requirements, representing 16% of total NEMT rides.

We estimate the overall size of the U.S. personal care services market, in terms of annual spend, to be approximately $55.0 billion, and it is expected to grow annually by 9% to 14% to $100.0 billion by 2024. The U.S. personal care services market also benefits from the strong underlying trends of aging demographics and a shift toward value-based care, which is moving care away from more expensive institutional settings and into the home. Many consumers in this segment need services on a long-term basis to address chronic conditions. Payors establish their own eligibility standards, determine the type, amount, duration and scope of services, and establish the applicable reimbursement rate in accordance with applicable law, regulations or contracts. By providing services in the home to the elderly and others who require long-term care and support with the activities of daily living, personal care service providers lower the cost of treatment by delaying or eliminating the need for care in more expensive settings, such as nursing homes that we believe can cost more than two times more than equivalent
10


personal care services. In addition, caregivers observe and report changes in the condition of patients for the purpose of facilitating early intervention in the disease process, which often reduces the cost of medical services by preventing unnecessary emergency room visits and/or hospital admissions and re-admissions. By providing care in the preferred setting of the home and by providing opportunities to improve the patient’s conditions and allow early intervention as indicated, personal care also is designed to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Personal care services are a significant component of home and community-based services, which have grown in significance and demand in recent years. Demand for personal care services is expected to continue to grow due to the aging of the U.S. population, increased life expectancy and improved opportunities for individuals to receive home-based care as an alternative to institutional care. The population of 65 and older nationally has been consistently growing and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that starting in 2030, when all baby boomers will be older than 65, Americans 65 years and older will make up 21% of the population, up from 15% today.

The personal care services industry developed in a highly fragmented manner, with few large participants and many small ones. Few companies have a significant market share across multiple regions or states. We expect ongoing consolidation within the industry, driven by the desire of payors to narrow their networks of service providers, and as a result of the industry’s increasingly complex regulatory, operating and technology requirements. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on a consolidating industry given our reputation in the market, strong payor relationships and integration of technology into our business model.

NEMT Segment
 
NET Services
Services offered. NET Services provides non-emergency transportationWe provide NEMT solutions to our clients, including state governments, MCOs and health systems, in 3850 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2017,2020, approximately 23.628.7 million individuals were eligible to receivemembers received our transportation services, and during 2017, NET Servicesin 2020, we managed 66.8approximately 48.2 million gross trips. For 2017, 2016 and 2015, NET Services accounted for 81.2%, 78.2% and 73.3%, respectively, of Providence’s consolidated service revenue, net.

NET ServicesWe primarily contractscontract with state Medicaid programs and managed care organizations (“MCOs” and collectively “NET customers”)MCOs, including MA plans, for the coordination of their members’ (“NET end-users”) non-emergency transportation, who are our “end-users”, NEMT needs. NETOur end-users are typically Medicaid or Medicare eligible members, whose limited mobility or financial resources hinders their ability to access necessary healthcare and social services. We believe our transportation services enable access to care, as well as access to food, shelter, socialization, and pharmacy, that not only improves the quality of life and health of the populations we serve, but also enables many of the individuals we serve to pursue independent living in their homes rather than in more expensive institutional care settings. We provide access to NEMT on a more cost effective basis than self-administered state Medicaid or MCO transportation programs while improving the lives and health outcomes of the populations we serve.
NET Services program delivery is dependent upon a highly-integrated technology platform and business process as well as the management of a multifaceted network of subcontracted transportation providers. Our technology platform is purpose-built for the unique needs of our industry and is highly scalable, capable of supporting substantial growth in our clients’ current and future membership base. In addition, our technology platform efficiently provides a broad interconnectivity among NET end-users, NET customers, and our network of transportation providers. We believe this technological capability and our industry experience uniquely position us as a future focal point in the evolving healthcare industry to introduce valuable population insights. In 2016 and 2017, we introduced service offerings and new technological features for NET end-users to improve service levels, lower costs and build the foundation for additional data analytics capabilities.



To fulfill the transportation needs of NETour end-users, we apply our proprietary technology platform to an extensive network of approximately 5,1005,700 transportation resources. This includes our in-network roster of fully contracted third-party transportation providers who operate sedans, wheelchair equipped vehicles, multi-passenger vans and ambulances. Our system also utilizes partnerships with on-demand transportation network companies, mass transit entities, mileage reimbursement programs, taxis and county-based emergency medical service providers. To promote safety, quality and compliance, our in-networkin‑network transportation providers undergo an in-depth credentialing and education process. Our proprietary technology platform is designed to connect with our external partners’ application program interfaces to improve on-time and on-demand performance, provide real time information and analytics (including live vehicle location data), minimize cancellations and better allow for the scale required to provide an effective, nationwide service.


Our transportation management services also include fraud, waste, and abuse prevention and identification through utilization review programs designed to monitor that our transportation services are provided in compliance with Medicaid and Medicare program rules and regulations as well as to remediate issues that are identified. Compliance controls include ongoing monitoring, auditing and remediation efforts, such as validating NET end-user eligibility for the requested date of service and employing a series of gatekeeping questions to checkverify that the treatment type is covered and the appropriate mode of transportation is assigned. We also conduct post-trip confirmations of attendance directly with the healthcare providers for certain repetitive trips, and we employ field monitors to inspect transportation provider vehicles and to observe some transports in real time. Our claims validation process generally limits payment to trips that are properly documented, have been authorized in advance, and are billed at the pre-trip estimated amount. Our claims process is increasingly digital, which provides more protection to member protected health information and reduces the impact on the environment. Transportation providers are able to submit their bills and supporting documentation directly to us through a secured web portal.


In 2016, NET Services launched a strategic initiative to enhance client and member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies. This initiative focuses on developing and deploying new processes and technologies needed to: progress towards an industry-leading call center and reservation scheduling platform; improve member communication, accessibility, and satisfaction; optimize the utilization of our extensive network of transportation providers; and build the foundation for additional analytical capabilities. Implementations under this strategic initiative that were completed in 2017 include new workforce management tools aimed at streamlining our call center operations and decreasing payroll costs, tools and models to better monitor transportation provider performance and capacity availability, and rate setting protocols aimed at lowering transportation costs and improving service quality. The full implementation of the initiative is expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2018.
Revenue andcustomersCustomers. In 2017,2020, contracts with state Medicaid agencies and MCOs represented 55.9%approximately 49.3% and 44.1%50.7%, respectively, of NET Services’NEMT Segment revenue. NET ServicesThe NEMT Segment derived 13.8%approximately 9.5%, 13.1%12.7% and 15.0%12.6% of its revenue from a single state Medicaid agency for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The next four largest NET ServicesNEMT Segment customers by revenue comprised in thethe aggregate comprised 22.3%approximately 21.6%, 22.6%19.7% and 24.2%21.4% of NET Services’NEMT Segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
11



Contracts with state Medicaid agencies are typically for three to five years with multiple renewal options. Contracts with MCOs continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice (as determined in accordance with the contract),terms of the contract and allow for regular price adjustments based upon utilization and transportation cost. As of December 31, 2017, 30.8%2020, 22.0% of NET ServicesNEMT Segment revenue was generated under state Medicaid contracts that are subject to renewal within the next 12 months. In 2017, NET Services renewedWhile we typically expect to renew these contracts representing 29.5%on an annual basis, we did receive notice from three customers that they were terminating or not renewing their contracts that expired on September 30, November 30 and December 31, 2020, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded revenue of $40.6 million for these contracts.

The NEMT Segment generated 86.2% of its revenue in such year, including its contract with the New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, to provide non-emergency medical transportation management services to Medicaid-eligible New Jersey residents.
77.9% of NET Services’ revenue in 2017 was generated2020 under capitated contracts where we assume the responsibility of meeting the covered healthcare related transportation requirements of a specific population based on per-member per-month, or PMPM, fees for the number of eligible members enrolled in the customer’s program.program for a flat-fee for the contract period. Revenue is recognized as services are provided, based on the population served during the period. Profitability for these contracts is largely driven by the extent to which actual utilization meets or exceeds expected utilization at the time of contract pricing. Under certain capitated contracts, known as reconciliation contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These partial paymentsprepayments are periodically reconciled to actual utilization and costs and may be due backresult in refunds to the customer, or additional payments may be due tofrom the Company, after each reconciliation period, based on a reconciliationcustomer. The remaining 13.8% of actual utilization and cost compared to the prepayment made. 22.1% of NET Services’NEMT Segment revenue was generated under other types of fee arrangements, including administrative services only fee for service (“FFS”), cost plus and flat fee contracts,FFS, under which fees are generated based upon billing rates for specific services or defined membership populations.

SeasonalityDevelopment Efforts and New Product Offerings. While revenueThe delivery of our NEMT program is generally fixed, primarilydependent upon a highly integrated platform of technology and business processes as well as the management of a multifaceted network of third-party transportation providers. Our technology platform is purpose-built for the unique needs of our industry and is highly scalable: capable of supporting substantial growth in our clients’ current and future membership base. In addition, our technology platform efficiently provides a broad interconnectivity among end-users, customers, and our network of transportation providers. We believe this technological capability and our industry experience position us well as a result of the capitated nature of the majority of our contracts, service expense varies based on the utilization of our services. The quarterly operating income and cash flows of NET Services normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variationsfocal point in the business, principally dueevolving healthcare industry to introduce valuable population insights. We also believe that it will enable us to deliver to our customers and end-users a single repeatable model that standardizes our offerings and is more customer‑centric across each contact center. We provide service offerings and technological features for end-users to improve service levels, lower costs and build the foundation for additional data analytics capabilities. We are continuing to implement a modern, cloud based, interactive, voice responsive automated call distribution and work force management system across all contact centers. Our technology also allows for real time notifications to members on their mobile devices, integration with a wide variety of ATMS and transportation demand during the winter seasonnetwork companies, real time ride tracking, network management and higher demand during the summer season.analytics.

Competition. We compete with a variety of national organizations that provide similar healthcare and social services related transportation, such as Medical Transportation Management, Southeastrans, Veyo, and American Medical Response,Access2Care, as


well as local and regional providers. Most local competitors seek to win contracts for specific counties or small geographic territories, whereas we and other larger competitors seek to win contracts for an entire state or large regional area. We compete based upon a number of factors, including our nationwide network, technical expertise, experience, service capability, service quality, and price.


Business developmentSeasonality. Our salesquarterly operating income and marketing strategy relies oncash flows normally fluctuate as a concentratedresult of seasonal variations in the business, development effort, with centralized marketing programs. Dueprincipally due to lower transportation demand during the critical nature of ourwinter season and higher demand during the summer season.

Personal Care Segment

We provide in-home personal care services to our customers rely upon our past delivery performance record, network developmentwith 57 agency branches across seven states, including in several of the nation’s largest home care markets: New York, New Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, West Virginia and management expertise, technical expertiseConnecticut. We place non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and capability,skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and specialized knowledge. A significant portionassistance performing daily living activities in the home setting, including persons who are at increased risk of our revenue is generated from long-term, repeat customers. Our long-term strategy is to improve our positionhospitalization or institutionalization, such as the preferred provider of transportation, complementary network-basedelderly, chronically ill or disabled senior citizens and disabled adults. Our personal care services and data analytics offerings to a broad array of healthcare payers. Key elements of our long-term strategy include continued investment in our technologies, enabling us to both lower costs and improve service delivery. We also consider acquisitions of businesses that serve our market or leverage our nationwide infrastructure.
WD Services
Services offered. WD Services is a global provider of employmentbathing, personal hygiene, grooming, oral care, dressing, medication reminders, meal planning, preparation and placementfeeding, housekeeping, transportation services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programsprescription reminders, and certain health related services to eligible participantsassistance with dressing and ambulation, all of government sponsored programs. For 2017, 2016which enable aging-in-place and 2015, WD Services accounted for 18.8%, 21.8% and 26.7%, respectively, of Providence’s consolidated revenue.
WD Services’ end user client base (“WD end-users”) is broad and includes the disabled, recently and long-term unemployed and individuals seeking new skills, as well as individuals that are coping with medical illnesses, are newly graduated from educational institutions, or are being released from incarceration.

support overall wellness. As of December 31, 2017, WD Services operated2020, we had approximately 14,000 trained caregivers throughout all of our branch locations serving, on average, approximately 12,500 patients and providing approximately 21.0 million hours of patient care annually.

12


Our Personal Care Segment payor clients include federal, state and local governmental agencies, MCOs, commercial insurers and private individuals. The federal, state and local programs under which these organizations operate are subject to legislative, budgetary and other risks that can influence reimbursement rates. MCOs that operate as an extension of our government payors are subject to similar economic pressures. Our commercial insurance payor clients are continuously seeking opportunities to control costs.

Most of our personal care services are provided pursuant to agreements with state and local governmental aging services agencies, Medicaid waiver programs, and home and community based long-term living programs. These agreements generally have an initial term of one to two years and may be terminated with 60 days’ notice. They are typically renewed in 10 countries outsideour experience for one to five-year terms, provided that we have complied with licensing, certification and program standards, and other regulatory requirements.

Reimbursement rates and methods vary by state and type of service, but are typically fee-for-service based on hourly or other unit-of-service bases. MCOs are becoming an increasing portion of our Personal Care Segment payor mix as states shift from administering fee-for-service programs to utilizing managed care models.

Development Efforts and New Product Offerings. We do not deploy proprietary technology in our Personal Care Segment, but we have invested in the implementation of the U.S. These countries includedenterprise technology solution Homecare Software Solutions, LLC, which operates under the United Kingdom (“UK”)HHAeXchange brand and which we refer to as “HHAeXchange”, France, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Canada, Germany, Australia, Switzerlandto manage compliance, scheduling, electronic visit verification (or EVV), payroll and Singapore. WD Services also holdsrevenue cycle. HHAeXchange has been implemented for the majority of our Personal Care Segment business, and additional functionality is being implemented, including “Stop & Watch” monitoring of change in patient condition, care plan reporting via EVV, mobile application self‑service and others. The three MCOs in Pennsylvania selected HHAeXchange to collect confirmed homecare visits, create claims to MCOs and provide workflow efficiency tools, enabling interoperability between our Personal Care Segment operations and the three Pennsylvania MCOs. Additionally, we have implemented the Relias e-learning solutions in select operations, and we continue to roll out the application throughout the segment. Relias e-learning solutions enables required training to be delivered remotely and helps improve utilization by reducing time lost for training.

Competition. The personal care services industry in which we operate is highly competitive and fragmented. Providers range from facility-based agencies (e.g., day health centers, live-in facilities, government agencies) to independent home care companies. They can be not-for-profit organizations or for-profit organizations. There are relatively few barriers to entry in some of the home healthcare services markets in which we operate. We believe, however, that we have a noncontrolling interest in a joint venture in Spain.favorable competitive position, attributable mainly to:


In orderthe consistently high quality and targeted services we have provided over the years to build upon its leadership positionour patients;
our ability to serve complex, high-needs patient populations;
our scale and density in the UK employment services industry, enhance client satisfactionmarkets we serve;
our strong relationships with payors and drive greater operational efficiencies, WD Services implemented the Ingeus Futures program, which was substantially completedreferral sources;
our investments in 2017. This program included organizational restructuring, the developmenttechnology; and deployment of new processes and technologies, and increased business development resources. Each aspect of the program was aimed at improving operational efficiencies and client services as well as developing the internal capabilities necessary to ensure long-term profitable growth in the employment, training and healthcare industries.
Revenue,customers and clients. The majority of WD Services’ revenue is generated through the provision of employability, legal offender rehabilitationour compliance protocols and training programs for associates who provide direct care to national government entities seeking to reduce unemployment or recidivism rates. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016patients.

Seasonality. Our quarterly operating income and 2015, 61.4%, 68.3% and 75.5%, respectively, of WD Services’ revenue was derived from operations in the UK, with 38.6%, 31.7% and 24.5%, respectively, derived from operations outside the UK. Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, 19.6%, 28.9% and 40.0% of WD Services’ revenue was derived from a contract with the UK government’s Department of Work and Pensions for employability services and 27.1%, 25.9% and 28.2% of WD Services’ revenue was derived from a contract with the UK government’s Ministry of Justice (the “MOJ”), for legal offender rehabilitation services. Revenue under the UK employability services contract is decreasingcash flows normally fluctuate as expected, as referrals ended under this program in March 31, 2017. In late 2017, WD Services was awarded three new employability contracts and one sub-contract under the new Work and Health Programme in the UK, allowing Ingeus to continue to maintain its position as a leader in the UK workforce development market, although overall this program has a smaller scale than the legacy employability services contract. During 2017, there was negligible revenue under the new Work and Health Programme.
The revenue earned by WD Services under its contracts is often derived through a combination of different revenue channels including, but not limited to, fees contingent upon: (1) the volume of WD end-users referred to and/or admitted into a specific program, (2) the achievement of defined outcomes for specific individuals, such as a job placement or continued employment and (3) the achievement of defined outcomes for a population of individuals over a specific time period, such as aggregate employment or recidivism rates. The relative contributions of different revenue channels under a specific contract can fluctuate meaningfully over the life of a contract and thus contribute to significant earnings volatility. Revenue recognition related to our National Citizen Services (“NCS”) youth programs can be particularly volatile due to the timing of services provided, which typically occur in the second and third quarters of each year. WD Services also earns revenue under fixed FFS arrangements, based


upon contractual rates established at the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.  
The nature of the services offered by WD Services often relies on our ability to improve a certain set of outcomes at a reduced cost versus previously utilized in-sourced delivery models. As a result, as we commence new contracts using transformational delivery models, we are often required to invest significant upfront capital for information technology, human resources, facilities and other onboarding costs, such as consultants and redundancy payments. The level of upfront funding required is dependent upon the size and nature of the contract. Although significant upfront funding may be required, revenues are often payable only as services are delivered and, in some cases, only after incentive measures have been achieved over a multi-year period. As a result of these two factors, there can be significant variabilityseasonal variations in our earningsthe business, principally due to somewhat lower demand for in-home services from quarter-to-quartercaregivers during the summer and year-to-year. In addition, underperiods with major holidays, as patients may spend more time with family and less time alone needing outside care during those periods. Our payroll expense in the majority of WD Services’ contracts,Personal Care Segment is also generally higher during the Company relies on its customers, which include government agencies, to provide referrals, for which the Company can provide services and earn revenue. The timing and magnitude of referrals can fluctuate significantly, leading to volatility in revenue. The Company also relies on certain customers to periodically provide information regarding the achievement of service delivery targets, which information could result in reductions in future payments if targets are not met. As a result, we often measure a contracts success over the entire termearlier quarters of the contractyear prior to employees reaching the applicable thresholds for certain payroll taxes, and believe the financial results of WD Services are best viewedduring periods with major holidays resulting from a multi-year perspective.

The MOJ is currently reviewing its program for outsourcing probationary services, which includes its contracts with our subsidiary Reducing Reoffending Partnership (“RRP”), which is in our WD Services segment. The review includes an investigation regarding sustainability of the economic terms of such contracts, as well as data relating to reoffending statistics and other factors that could impact contractual performance measures. The potential impact of this review on RRP’s agreement with the MOJ, including with respect to any potential payments to the MOJ that may be required, cannot be determined at this time because the review is ongoing. See also “Risk Factors—Risks Relatedholiday pay provided by us to our Business—If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds.”caregivers.

Seasonality. While there has been period-to-period variability in WD Services’ earnings due to the factors discussed above and also set forth in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Revenues and Expenses – WD Services”, there has not been a material seasonal effect on WD Services’ results of operations.
Competition. In the UK, U.S., Saudi Arabia and Singapore the workforce development market is served by large, often multi-national, corporations, along with national and regional for-profit and non-profit entities. In Canada, France, Germany, South Korea, Spain and Switzerland, our competition is primarily companies specific to the geography, nationally or regionally, and both privately owned for-profit and non-profit entities. In the UK, the offender rehabilitation market is served by large corporations, often working with charitable sector providers. In general our larger competitors internationally include Maximus, Interserve, Sodexo, The Reed Group and Working Links.
The market for services to governments is competitive and subject to change and pricing pressure, particularly during the bidding for new contracts and contract renewals. However, due to the critical nature of our offerings and the WD end-users we serve, market entry can be difficult for new entrants or those without prior established track-records. Other barriers to entry include operational service complexity and significant upfront investments. This can include establishment of complex IT systems which often must interface with government systems, significant monitoring and reporting obligations, delivery from sites across wide geographies, and management and development of supply chains.
Business development. Our business development activities are performed both locally and centrally from WD Services’ London headquarters. Through local and global networks and relationships, we become aware of new opportunities for which we develop bids through competitive processes. The nature of the competitive processes varies from highly competitive to being one of a few providers, or the sole provider, to bid on a contract. We pursue only those contracts that meet certain investment criteria, including risk-weighted return on capital thresholds, and involve the provision of services where we believe our experience will allow us to deliver differentiated and improved outcomes for our clients.

Matrix Investment Segment

Providence’s Matrix Investment is comprised of our interest in Matrix. Since the completion of the Matrix Transaction, the Company has hadWe own a noncontrolling43.6% non-controlling equity interest in Matrix. The CompanyWe and an affiliate of Frazier, Health Partners (the “Frazier Subscriber”), which holds the controlling equity interest in Matrix, are party to thea Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, (the “Operating Agreement”)or Operating Agreement, of Mercury Parent, LLC, the company through which the parties hold their equity interests in Matrix. The Operating Agreement sets forth certainthe terms and conditions regarding theour ownership, by the Company and Frazier Subscriber of interests in Mercury Parent and theirincluding our indirect ownership of common stock of Matrix, and


provides for, among other things, certain liquidity and governance rights and other obligations and rights, in each case, on the terms and conditions contained therein.

At December 31, 2017,in the Company owned a 46.6% noncontrollingOperating Agreement. We account for our interest in Matrix. Prior toMatrix under the closing ofequity method whereby the Matrix Transaction, the financial results of Matrix were included in our Health Assessment Services (“HA Services”) segment. The Company’s proportionate share of Matrix’s net assets is recorded as equity investment in our consolidated balance sheets and our proportionate share of its financial results for the period following the closing of the Matrix Transaction are presented under therecorded as equity method. The assets, liabilities and financial results of Matrix for the period prior to the closing of the Matrix Transaction are presentednet gain (loss) on investee within discontinued operations. For additional information regarding the Matrix Transaction, see Note 20, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements.statements of operations.

Services offered.
13


Matrix providesoffers in-home and on-site care optimization services for members, including comprehensive health assessments, or CHAs, through a national network of community-based clinicians and care management solutions, which include CHAs.a fleet of mobile health clinics with advanced diagnostics capabilities. As of December 31, 2017,2020, Matrix utilized a national network of over 5,800approximately 4,200 clinical providers, including 1,7002,500 nurse practitioners, (“NPs”), located across 5048 states, to provide its services primarily to members of Medicare Advantage (“MA”)MA health plans.

Matrix recently expanded its provider network and service offerings through a series of acquisitions. In December 2017, Matrix grew its clinical provider network through its acquisition of LP Health Services, a provider of quality and wellness visits on behalf of Medicaid/Duals managed care plans across the U.S., for a purchase price of $3.8 million. LP Health Services’ revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $6 million.

In February 2018, Matrix completed its acquisition of HealthFair, a leading operator of mobile clinics which offer preventative health assessment and advanced diagnostic testing services, including laboratory, ultrasound, EKG and mammography testing, for a purchase price of $160 million plus an earnout payment contingent on HealthFair’s 2018 performance. With the addition of HealthFair, Matrix’s network increased to more than 6,000 community-based providers across all 50 states, including over 1,700 NPs. We believe the combination of the two organizations will provide health plan members with more convenient access to important care management and preventative health services. As a result of the rollover of certain equity interests of HealthFair, Providence’s equity ownership in Matrix was 43.6% as of February 16, 2018. HealthFair’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $45 million.

Matrix primarily generates revenue fromthrough the performance of CHAs, which obtainseek to confirm a health plan members’member’s information related to health status, and social, environmental and medical risks, and help theto assist MA health plans improvein improving the accuracy of such information. Matrix’s services typically commence with a member analysis that utilizes client data, such as medical claims data, to maximize its ability to improve client and member outcomes as a result of the assessment process. Through Matrix’s contact centers, which include approximately 160 colleagues, Matrix pursues additional data collection and schedules assessments. Matrix’s NPs then conduct a CHA, which is comprised of a physical examination and other diagnostic services, in the member’s home. Matrix also operates a care management offering which provides additional data analytics, and chronic care management services.services and employee wellness programs.

Customers. As of December 31, 2020, Matrix’s customers included 59 health plans, including for-profit multistate health plans and non-profit health plans that operate in only one state or several counties within one state, as well as 18 other companies. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Matrix’s top five customers accounted for 75.3% of its revenue, with its largest customer comprising 23.4% of its revenue and its second largest customer comprising 16.1% of its revenue. Matrix enters into annual or multi-annual contracts under which it is paid on a per assessment basis. Volumes are not guaranteed under contracts, however, and customers may choose to utilize other third-party providers or in-source capabilities. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Matrix generated net income of $15.1 million on a standalone basis, and had $245.7 million of outstanding net debt as of December 31, 2020.

Development Efforts and New Product Offerings. Matrix’s services are dependent upon its technology platform which integrates the clinical provider network, operations infrastructure, callcontact centers and clients. Matrix’s platform is designed for the unique needs of its industry, is highly scalable and can support substantial growth. We believe Matrix’s network and platform positionsposition Matrix as a future focal point in the evolving healthcare industry in the introduction of both additional population insights and care management services. With data provided by its health plan clients, Matrix utilizes analytics to determine which members it can most effectively lower costs and improve outcomes through face-to-face engagements with clinicians. Each program is customized and is served by a comprehensive team of case managers, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and trained callcontact center colleagues.

Revenue,customers and clients. As of December 31, 2017, Matrix’s customers included 48 health plans, including for-profit multi-state health plans and non-profit health plans that operate in only one state or several counties within one state. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Matrix’s top five customers accounted for 72.2% of its revenue, as its largest customer accounted for 30.9% of its revenue and its second largest customer account for 26.8% of its revenue. Matrix enters into annual or multi-annual contracts with its customers under which it is paid on a per assessment basis.
Seasonality. The Company attempts to perform CHAs evenly throughout the year to efficiently utilize NP capacity, although the timing of performance is driven by client demand.  
Competition. We believe that Matrix and CenseoHealth, which announced in December 2017 a combination with AdvanceSignify Health a smaller competitor, are the largest independent providers of CHAs to the health plan market. There are many smaller competitors, such as EMSI Healthcare Services, MedXM, which was acquired byis a Quest Diagnostics on February 1, 2018,company, and Inovalon. In addition, some health plans in-source CHA services. Matrix’s chronic care management competitors include Landmark Healthcare, PopHealthcarePopHealthCare, which is a GuideWell company, and Optum.
14



Governmental Regulations

Employees
As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 7,100 employees across Providence and our subsidiaries. Of such employees, approximately 3,800 work in NET Services and approximately 3,300 work in WD Services. In addition, 30 employees primarily conduct corporate activities. 
None of our U.S. employees are members of a union. We have nearly 1,950 and 330 full-time employees in the UK and France, respectively. Certain of our UK employees are members of the NAPO and Unison unions and certain of our employees in France are members of the Confederation Generale du Travail and have collective bargaining rights. In other countries employees may be members of a trade union but these trade unions are not formally recognized by us. Participation in unions is confidential under European employment laws. We believe we have good relationships with our employees, both unionized and non-unionized, in the U.S. and internationally.
Regulatory Environment
NET Services and Matrix Investment

Overview

Our NET Services and Matrix Investment segments (the “U.S. Healthcare Segments”) arebusiness is subject to numerous U.S. federal, state and local laws, regulations and agency guidance (collectively, “Laws”).guidance. These Lawslaws significantly affect the way in which these segmentswe operate various aspects of their businesses. Our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsour business. We must also comply with state and local licensing requirements, state and federal requirements for participation in Medicare and Medicaid, requirements for contracting with MA plans, and contractual requirements imposed upon themus by the federal, state and local agencies and third-party commercial customers to which theywe provide services. Failure to follow the rules and requirements of these programs can significantly affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ ability to be paid for the services theywe provide and be authorized to provide services on an ongoing basis.

The Medicare and Medicaid programs are governed by significant and complex Laws.laws. Both Medicare and Medicaid are financed, at least in part, with federal funds. Therefore, any direct or indirect recipients of those funds are subject to federal fraud, waste and abuse Laws.laws. In addition, there are federal privacy and data security Lawslaws that govern the healthcare industry. State Lawslaws primarily pertain to the licensure of certain categories of healthcare professionals and providers and the state’s interest in regulating the quality of healthcare in the state, regardless of the source of payment, but may also include state Lawslaws pertaining to fraud, waste and abuse, privacy and data security Laws,laws, and the state’s regulation of its Medicaid program. Federal and state regulatory laws that may affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businesses,business, include, but are not limited to the following:


false and other improper claims or false statements Lawslaws pertaining to reimbursement;
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (“HIPAA”)or HIPAA, and its privacy, security, breach notification and enforcement and code set regulations and guidance, along with evolving state Lawslaws protecting patient privacy and requiring notifications of unauthorized access to, or use of, patient medical information;
civil monetary penalties Law;law;
anti-kickback Laws;laws;
Section 1877 of the Stark LawSocial Security Act, also known as the “Stark Law”, and other self-referral, financial inducement, fee splitting, and patient brokering Laws;laws;
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, regulations pertaining to Medicare and Medicaid as well as CMS releases applicable to the operation of MA plans, such as reimbursement rates, risk adjustment and data collection methodologies, adjustments to quality management measurements and other relevant factors;
State Medicaid laws, rules and regulations that govern program participation, operations, the provision of care to Medicaid beneficiaries and the reimbursement for such services; and
state licensure laws.

A violation of certain of these Lawslaws could result in civil and criminal damages and penalties, the refund of monies paid by government or private payers,payors, our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ exclusion from participation in federal healthcare payerpayor programs, or the loss of our segments’ license to conduct some or all of our business within a particular state’s boundaries. While we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, allegations that we failed to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Federal Law and State Laws

Federal healthcare Lawslaws apply in any case in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments are providingwe provide an item or service that is reimbursable or provide information to such segments’our customers that results in reimbursement by a federal healthcare payerpayor program to such segments or to them.us. The principal federal Lawslaws that affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businessesbusiness include those that prohibit the filing of false or improper claims or other data with federal healthcare payerpayor programs, and those thatrequire confidentiality of patient health information, prohibit unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable under federal healthcare payer programs.payor programs and those that prohibit physicians from referring to certain entities if the physician has a financial relationship with that entity.



State healthcare laws apply in any case in which we provide an item or service that is reimbursable or provide information to our customers that results in reimbursement by a state Medicaid program to us. The principal state Medicaid laws that affect our business include those that prohibit the filing of false or improper claims or other data with state Medicaid programs, prohibit unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable by a state Medicaid program and those that prohibit physicians from referring to certain entities if the physician has a financial relationship with that entity. Because we receive Medicaid reimbursement, we are subject to applicable participation conditions including a variety of operational, conflict of interest, and structural obligations. For example, in states that have elected to obtain authority to provide NEMT as a medical service through a broker using the regulatory process permitted by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA, we are prohibited from contracting with any transportation provider with which we have a financial relationship. In addition to Medicaid laws, many states have health care or professional licensure requirements that potentially apply to parts of our business.
15


False and Other Improper Claims

Under the federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733) and similar state Laws,laws, the government may impose civil liability on our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsus if theywe knowingly submit a false claim to the government or cause another to submit a false claim to the government, or knowingly make a false record or statement intended to get a false claim paid by the government. The False Claims Act defines a claim as a demand for money or property made directly to the government or to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the money is to be spent on the government’s behalf or if the government will reimburse the contractor or grantee. Liability can be incurred for submitting (or causing another to submit) false claims with actual knowledge or for submitting false claims with reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance. Liability can also be incurred for knowingly making or using a false record or statement to receive payment from the federal government orgovernment; for knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the government.government; or for knowingly noncomplying with a law or regulation that is material to the government’s decision to pay Medicare or Medicaid claims. Consequently, a provider need not take an affirmative action to conceal or avoid an obligation to the government, but the mere retention of an overpayment from the government could lead to potential liability under the False Claims Act.

Many states also have similar false claims statutes. In addition, healthcare fraud is a priority of the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (“DHHS”),or DHHS, its program integrity contractors and its Office of Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and state Attorneys General. These agencies have devoted a significant amount of resources to investigating healthcare fraud.

If our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe are ever found to have violated the False Claims Act, theywe could be required to make significant payments to the government (including damages and penalties in addition to the return of reimbursements previously collected) and could be excluded from participating in federal healthcare programs or providing services to entities which contract with those programs. Although our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe monitor theirour billing practices for compliance with applicable laws, such laws are very complex, and theywe might not be able to detect all errors or interpret such laws in a manner consistent with a court or an agency’s interpretation. While the criminal statutes generally are reserved for instances evidencing fraudulent intent, the civil and administrative penalty statutes are being applied by the federal government in an increasingly broad range of circumstances. Examples of the types of activities giving rise to liability for filing false claims include billing for services not rendered, misrepresenting services rendered (i.e., miscoding), applications for duplicate reimbursement and providing false information that results in reimbursement or impacts reimbursement amounts. Additionally, the federal government takes the position that a pattern of claiming reimbursement for unnecessary services violates these statutes if the claimant should have known that the services were unnecessary. The federal government also takes the position that claiming reimbursement for services that are substandard is a violation of these statutes if the claimant should have known that the care was substandard. Criminal penalties also are available even in the case of claims filed with private insurers if the federal government shows that the claims constitute mail fraud or wire fraud or violate any of the federal criminal healthcare fraud statutes.

State Medicaid agencies and state Attorneys General also have authority to seek criminal or civil sanctions for fraud and abuse violations. In addition, private insurers may bring actions under state false claim laws. In certain circumstances, federal and state laws authorize private whistleblowers to bring false claim or “qui tam” suits on behalf of the government against providers and reward the whistleblower with a portion of any final recovery. In addition, the federal government has engaged a number of private audit organizations to assist it in tracking and recovering claims for healthcare services that may have been improperly submitted.

Governmental investigations and whistleblower “qui tam”qui tam suits against healthcare companies have increased significantly in recent years, and have resulted in substantial penalties and fines and exclusions of persons and entities from participating in government healthcare programs. For more information on the risks related to a failureWhile we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, allegations that we failed to comply with applicable government coding and billing rules, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, whichthese requirements could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”business.

Health Information, Privacy and Data Protection Practices

Under HIPAA, DHHS issued rules to define and implement standards for the electronic transactions and code sets for the submission of transactions such as claims, and privacy and security of individually identifiable health information in whatever manner it is maintained.

The Final Rule on Enforcement of the HIPAA Administrative Simplification provisions, including the transaction standards, the security standards and the privacy rule, published by DHHS addresses, among other issues, DHHS’s policies for determining violations and calculating civil monetary penalties, how DHHS will address the statutory limitations on the imposition of civil monetary penalties, and various procedural issues. The rule extends enforcement provisions currently
16


applicable to the


healthcare privacy regulations to other HIPAA standards, including security, transactions and the appropriate use of service code sets.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, (“HITECH”),or HITECH, enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, extends certain of HIPAA’s obligations to parties providing services to healthcare entities covered by HIPAA known as “business associates,” imposes new notice of privacy breach reporting obligations, extends enforcement powers to state attorney generalsAttorneys General and amends the HIPAA privacy and security laws to strengthen the civil and criminal enforcement of HIPAA. HITECH establishes four categories of violations that reflect increasing levels of culpability, four corresponding tiers of penalty amounts that significantly increase the minimum penalty amount for each violation, and a maximum penalty amount of $1.5 million for all violations of an identical provision. With the additional HIPAA enforcement power under HITECH, the Office offor Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human ServicesDHHS and states are increasing their investigations and enforcement of HIPAA compliance. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe have taken steps to ensure compliance with HIPAA and we are monitoring compliance on an ongoing basis.

Additionally, the HITECH Final Rule imposes various requirements on covered entities and business associates, and expands the definition of “business associates” to cover contractors of business associates. Even when our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe are not operating as covered entities, they may be deemed to be “business associates” for HIPAA rule purposes of such covered entities. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe monitor their compliance obligations under HIPAA as modified by HITECH, and implement operational and systems changes, associate training and education, conduct risk assessments and allocate resources as needed. Any noncompliance with HIPPAHIPAA requirements could expose such segmentsus to the criminal and increased civil penalties provided under HITECH and require them to incur significant costs in order to seek to comply with its requirements or to remediate potential issues that may arise.

Other state privacy laws may also apply to us, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which came into force in January 2020. The CCPA affords California residents with specified rights relating to the collection and use of their personal information. Violation of the CCPA may lead to monetary fines, and data breaches may give rise in certain circumstances to private rights of action by impacted individuals. While we believe that our practices are in compliance with these laws, allegations that we failed to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Federal and State Anti-Kickback Laws

Federal law commonly known as the “Anti-Kickback Statute” prohibits the knowing and willful offer, solicitation, payment or receipt of anything of value (direct or indirect, overt or covert, in cash or in kind) which is intended to induce:

the referral of an individual for a service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or certain other federal healthcare programs; or
the ordering, purchasing, leasing, or arranging for, or recommending the purchase, lease or order of, any service or item for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or certain other federal healthcare programs.

Interpretations of the Anti-Kickback Statute have been very broad and under current Law,law, courts and federal regulatory authorities have stated that the Anti-Kickback Statute is violated if even one purpose (as opposed to the sole or primary purpose) of the arrangement is to induce referrals. Even bona fide investment interests in a healthcare provider may be questioned under the Anti-Kickback Statute if the government concludes that the opportunity to invest was offered as an inducement for referrals.

This act is subject to numerous statutory and regulatory “safe harbors.” Compliance with the requirements of a safe harbor offers defenses against Anti-Kickback Statute allegations. Failure of an arrangement to satisfy all of the requirements of a particular safe harbor does not mean that the arrangement is unlawful. However, itIt may mean, however, that such an arrangement will be subject to scrutiny by the regulatory authorities.

Many states, including some where our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe do business, have adopted anti-kickback laws that are similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state laws are very closely patterned on the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; others, however, are broader and reach reimbursement by private payers.payors. If our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ activities were deemed to be inconsistent with state anti-kickback or illegal remuneration laws, theywe could face civil and criminal penalties or be barred from such activities, any of which could harm such segments’ businesses.us.


If our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ arrangements are found to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute or applicable state laws, these segments,we, along with theirour clients, would be subject to civil and criminal penalties, and these segments’ arrangements wouldpenalties. In addition, implicated contracts may not be legally enforceable, which could materially and adversely affect theirour business. For more information on the risks related to failureWhile we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, allegations that we failed to comply with applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments’ businessthese requirements could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.”have a material adverse impact on our business.
17


Federal and State Self-Referral Prohibitions

Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe may be subject to federal and state statutes banning payments for referrals of patients and referrals by physicians to healthcare providers with whom the physicians have a financial relationship. Section 1877 of the Social Security Act, also known as the “Stark Law”, prohibits physicians from making a “referral” for “designated health services” for


Medicare (and in many cases Medicaid) patients from entities or facilities in which such physicians directly or indirectly hold a “financial relationship”.

A financial relationship can take the form of a direct or indirect ownership, investment or compensation arrangement. A referral includes the request by a physician for, or ordering of, or the certifying or recertifying the need for, any designated health services.

Certain services that our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe provide may be identified as “designated health services” for purposes of the Stark Law. Such segments cannot provide assurance that future regulatory changes will not result in other services they provide becoming subject to the Stark Law’s ownership, investment or compensation prohibitions in the future.

Many states, including some states where our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe do business, have adopted similar or broader prohibitions against payments that are intended to induce referrals of clients. Moreover, many states where such segments operate have laws similar to the Stark Law prohibiting physician self-referrals. While our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe believe that theyour programs are operating in compliance with the Stark Law, there can be no guaranteethese laws, allegations that violations will not occur. we failed to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Healthcare Reform Litigation

On March 23, 2010, the President ofNovember 10, 2020, the United States signed into law comprehensive health reform throughSupreme Court heard arguments in Texas v. California. In that case, Texas is seeking to invalidate the Patient Protection andentirety of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 11-148) (“PPACA”ACA”). On March 30, 2010, by arguing that the President signedACA’s individual mandate is unconstitutional because it is no longer a reconciliation budget bill that included amendmentstax (because Congress changed the tax to zero) and the PPACA (Pub. L. 11-152). These laws in combination formindividual mandate cannot be severed from the “ACA” referred to herein. The changes to various aspects of the healthcare system in the ACA were far-reaching and included, among many others, substantial adjustments to Medicare reimbursement, establishment of individual mandates for healthcare coverage, extension of coverage to certain populations, expansion of Medicaid, restrictions on physician-owned hospitals, and increased efficiency and oversight provisions.
Some of the provisionsrest of the ACA, took effect immediately, while others will take effect laterso the entire ACA is unconstitutional. We are not able to predict the outcome of this matter nor are we able to predict the impact of a full or will be phased in over time, ranging from a few months following approval to ten years. Due to the complexitypartial invalidation of the ACA, it is likely that additional legislation will be considered and enacted. The ACA requiresACA. If the promulgation of regulations that will likely have significant effects on the healthcare industry and third-party payers. Thus, the healthcare industry and our operations may be subjected to significant new statutory and regulatory requirements and contractual terms and conditions, and consequently to structural and operational changes and challenges.
The ACA also implemented significant changes to healthcare fraud and abuse laws that intensify the risks and consequences of enforcement actions. These included expansion of the False Claims Act by: (a) narrowing the public disclosure bar; and (b) explicitly stating that violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute trigger false claims liability. In addition,Supreme Court invalidates the ACA, lessened the intent requirements under the Anti-Kickback Statute to provide thatthere could be a person may violate the statute without knowledge or specific intent. The ACA also provided new fundingmaterial change in individual insurance coverage, Medicaid enrollment and expanded powers to investigate fraud, including through expansion of thereimbursement by Medicare, Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) program to Medicare Parts C and D and Medicaid and authorizing the suspension of Medicare and Medicaid payments to a provider of services pending an investigation of a credible allegation of fraud. Finally, the legislation created enhanced penalties for noncompliance, including increased criminal penalties and expansion of administrative penalties under Medicare and Medicaid. Collectively, suchprivate health plans. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations.business.
On January 20, 2017, the President of the United States issued an executive order that directed federal agencies to take steps to ensure the government’s implementation of the ACA minimizes the burden on impacted parties (such as individuals and states). The underlying intent of the executive order was to take the first steps to repeal and replace the ACA. The executive order specifically instructed agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay implementation of provisions” that place a “fiscal burden on any State” or that impose a “cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden” on stakeholders including patients, providers, and insurers. The order stated that any changes should be made only to the extent “permitted by law” and should comply with the law governing administrative rule-making. The executive order did not, however, provide specifics on next steps or provisions that would be reexamined nor was it clear how the executive branch would be reconciled with Republican congressional efforts to repeal and replace the ACA or what portions of the ACA may continue in any replacement legislation. There are multiple pending legislative proposals to amend the ACA which, among other effects, could repeal all or parts of the ACA without replacing its extension of coverage to expansion populations. In addition, there are pending legislative proposals to materially restructure Medicaid and other government health care programs.

In 2017, legislation was proposed in the U.S. Congress, but did not advance out of committee and was not passed, which would reduce or eliminate certain non-emergency medical transportation services provided by NET Services as a required Medicaid


benefit. A similar proposal was made in 2018 by the President of the United States in a federal budget proposal. If additional privatization initiatives are not proposed or enacted, or if previously enacted privatization initiatives are challenged, repealed or invalidated, there could be a material adverse impact on our segments' operating results.

Surveys and Audits

Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ programs arebusiness is subject to periodic surveys by government authorities or their contractors and our payors to ensure compliance with various requirements. Regulators conducting periodic surveys often provide reports containing statements of deficiencies for alleged failures to comply with various regulatory requirements. In most cases, if a deficiency finding is made by a reviewing agency, our segmentswe will work with the reviewing agency to agree upon the steps to be taken to bring our program into compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In some cases, however, an agency may take a number of adverse actions against a program, including:


the imposition of fines or penalties or the recoupment of amounts paid;
temporary suspension of admission of new clients to our program’s service;
in extreme circumstances, exclusion from participation in Medicaid, Medicare or other programs;
revocation of our license; or
contract termination.

While our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe believe that our programs are in compliance with Medicare, Medicaid and other program certification requirements and state licensure requirements, failurethe rules and regulations governing Medicare, Medicaid participation and state licensure are lengthy and complex. Allegations that we failed to comply with these requirementslaws could have a material adverse impact on such segments’ businessesour business and theirour ability to enter into contracts with other agencies to provide services.

Billing/claimsClaims Reviews and Audits

Agencies and other third-party commercial payerspayors periodically conduct pre-payment or post-payment medical reviews or other audits of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ claims or other audits in conjunction with their obligations to comply with the requirements of Medicare or Medicaid. In order to conduct these reviews, payerspayors request documentation from our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsus and then review that documentation to determine compliance with applicable rules and regulations, including the eligibility of clients to receive benefits, the appropriateness of the care provided to those clients, and the documentation of that care. Any determination that such segments have not complied with applicable rules and regulations could result in adjustment of payments or the incurrence of fines and penalties, or in situations of significant compliance failures review or non-renewal of related contracts.
18


Corporate Practice of Medicine and Fee Splitting

SomeThe corporate practice of medicine doctrine prohibits corporations from practicing medicine or employing a physician to provide professional medical services. This doctrine arises from state medical practice acts and is based on a number of public policy concerns, including:

allowing corporations to practice medicine or employ physicians will result in the commercialization of the practice of medicine;
a corporation’s obligation to its shareholders may not align with a physician’s obligation to the physician’s patients; and
employment of a physician by a corporation may interfere with the physician’s independent medical judgment.

Most states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments operateMatrix operates and in which we provide personal care services prohibit general business entities, such asthe corporate practice of medicine. Every state provides an exception for physician ownership of a professional corporation. Many states provide an exception for employment of physicians by certain entities. The scope of these segments, from “practicing medicine,” which definitionexceptions varies from state to state. Corporate practice of medicine doctrine issues can also overlap with kickback and fee-splitting concerns. Some states use the corporate practice of medicine doctrine to limit the services that a manager can furnish to a physician or medical practice because the state is concerned that a manager might interfere with the physician’s independent medical judgment and/or impose an unacceptable intrusion into the relationship between the physician and can include employing physicians, as well as engaging in fee-splitting arrangements with these healthcare providers. the patient.

Among other things, our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsactivities, Matrix currently contractcontracts with and employ NPsemploys nurse practitioners to perform CHAs. CHAs and our Personal Care Segment currently:

employs registered nurses and licensed practical nurses to render skilled nursing care directly and to provide overall clinical supervision to patients; and
has medical professionals provide guidance to its Quality Improvement Committees.

We believe that such segmentsMatrix and our Personal Care Segment have structured their operations appropriately;appropriately. Either or both, however, they could be alleged or found to be in violation of some or all of these laws. If a state determines that some portion of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businesses violatethe business violates these laws, or that a payment induced a physician to refer a patient, it may seek to have such segmentsan entity discontinue or restructure those portions of their operations or subject themthe entity to increased costs, penalties, fines, certain license requirements or other measures. Any determination that such segments haveMatrix or we acted improperly in this regard may result in liability to them.liability. In addition, agreements between the corporationMatrix and the particular professional may be considered void and unenforceable.

Professional Licensure and Other Requirements

Many of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’Matrix’s employees are subject to federal and state laws and regulations governing the ethics and practice of their professions. For example, our mid-level practitioners (e.g., NPs)Nurse Practitioners) are subject to state laws requiring physician supervision and state laws governing mid-level scope of practice. As thephysicians’ use of mid-level practitioners by physicians increases, state governing boards are implementing more robust regulations governing mid-levels and their scope of practice under physician supervision. Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’The ability of Matrix to provide mid-level practitioner services may be restricted by the enactment of new state laws governing mid-level scope of practice and by state agency interpretations and enforcement of such existing laws. In addition, services rendered by mid-level practitioners may not be reimbursed by payors at the same rates as payors may reimburse physicians for the same services. Lastly, professionals who are eligible to participate in Medicare and Medicaid as individual providers must not have been excluded from participation in government programs at any time. Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’The ability of Matrix to provide services depends upon the ability of their personnel to meet individual licensure and other requirements and maintain such licensure in good standing.



COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Orders
WD
On January 30, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

Overview
As declared a provider of workforce development servicesPublic Health Emergency, and on March 13, 2020, the President declared a national emergency in response to the coronavirus outbreak in the U.S.United States under the Stafford Disaster Relief and 10 countries outsideEmergency Assistance Act and the U.S., WD Services is subject toNational Emergencies Act. In addition, state governors have declared public health emergencies and subsequently issued numerous nationalpublic health and local lawsexecutive orders.

These emergency, public health and regulations.executive orders have waived numerous legal requirements while also imposing new legal restrictions. Many public health and executive orders are issued, rescinded or modified with little advance notice. These lawsemergency, public health and regulations significantly affectexecutive orders have created significant uncertainty in the waylegal and operational duties of
19


health care providers. While we believe that our programs are in which we operate various aspects of our business. WD Services has implemented compliance policies to help assure our compliance with these lawsemergency, public health and regulations as they become effective; however, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations in the future could subject our practices toexecutive orders, allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in whichthat we conduct our business.

WD Services’ revenue is primarily derived from contracts that are funded by national governments that are seeking to reduce the overall unemployment rate or improve job placement success for targeted cohorts, and to reduce the recidivism rate. Further, the revenue we receive from these contracts is typically tied to milestones that are largely uncontrolled by us. Such milestones include the job placement success of clients, duration and tenure of clients in jobs once they are placed, and various other market and industry factors including the overall unemployment rate. For more information on the risks related to failure to satisfy our contractual obligations, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds.”
Data Security and Protection

WD Services is also subject to the European Union’s and other countries’ data security and protection laws and regulations. These laws and regulations impose broad obligations on the organizations that collect such data, as well as confer broad rights on individuals about whom such data is collected. There are amendments which will come into effect in 2018 with respect to European data privacy legislation which will significantly increase the fines for any breaches. In addition to their power to impose fines, information privacy regulators in Europe have significant powers to require organizations that breach regulations to put in place measures to ensure that such breaches do not occur again, and require businesses to stop processing personal information until the required measures are in place. For more information on the risks related to a failurefailed to comply with privacy and security regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information. Failure to comply with privacy and security regulations could result in a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”

The data security and protection laws and regulations may also restrict the flow of information, including information about employees or service users, from WD Services to Providence in the U.S. In certain instances, informed consent to the data transfer must be given by the affected employee or service user. Compliance with such laws and regulations is costly and requires our segment management to expend substantial time and resources which could negatively impact our segments’ results of operations. Compliance may also make it more difficult for the Company to gather data necessary to ensure the appropriate operation of its internal controls or to detect corruption, resulting in the need for additional controls or increasing the Company’s costs to maintain appropriate controls.

Anti-Bribery and Corruption

WD Services’ international operations are subject to various U.S. and foreign statutes that prohibit bribery and corruption, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK’s Bribery Act. These statutes generally require organizations to prohibit bribery by or for the organization and demand the implementation of systems to counter bribery, including risk management, training and guidance and the maintenance of adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. The statutes also, among other things, prevent the provision of anything of value to government officials for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. In addition, many countries in which we operate have antitrust or competition regulations which, among other things, prohibit collusive tendering or bid-rigging behavior. For more information on the risks related to a failure to comply with applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments’ business could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.”

Licensing

In many of the locations where WD Services operates, it is required by local laws to obtain and maintain licenses. The applicable state and local licensingthese requirements govern the services our segments provide, the credentials of staff, record keeping, treatment planning, client monitoring and supervision of staff. The failure to maintain these licenses or the loss of a license could


have a material adverse impact on WD Services businesses and could prevent them from providing services to clients in a given jurisdiction.

Surveys and audits
WD Services’ contracts permit clients to review its compliance or performance, as well as its records, at the client’s discretion. In most cases, if a deficiency is found by a reviewing agency, WD Services’ will work with the reviewing agency to agree upon the steps to be taken to bring our program into compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In the case of any deficiency, however, a client may take a number of adverse actions against WD Services, including: (i) termination or modification of existing contracts, (ii) prevention of receipt of new contracts or extension of existing contracts or (iii) reduction of fees paid under existing contract.
Billing Requirements
In WD Services, particularly in Europe, our contracts are subject to stringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of the payment mechanism. Under European procurement legislation which has been implemented in each EU member state, any conviction for fraud can result in a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. For more information on the risks related to a failure to comply with applicable government coding and billing rules, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, which could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”business.


BrexitCARES Act Provider Relief Fund


On June 23, 2016,The CARES Act established the UK heldProvider Relief Fund that made relief payments to certain health care providers. The purpose of the Provider Relief Fund was to provide funding to health care providers so they could prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. Providers who received relief payments are subject to eligibility criteria and specific terms and conditions on the use of relief payments. To receive relief payments, many providers were required to attest to numerous statements regarding accuracy of their application and their compliance with the eligibility criteria and the terms and conditions. Providers’ use of relief payments is limited to health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. Providers are required to have documentation that relief payments were used for those purposes. There is limited guidance concerning what the government might consider a referendumhealth care related expense or lost revenue that was attributable to coronavirus or what type of documentation is adequate.

Prior to our acquisition of Simplura, it received relief payments from the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund. While we believe that the receipt and use of relief payments was in compliance with Provider Relief Fund requirements, allegations of a failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Human Capital Management

Attracting, developing and retaining talented people who embrace our culture, execute our strategy, and enable us to compete effectively in our industry is critical to our success. In fact, ensuring that we have the right people in the right seats is one of our six pillars guiding our business strategy.

We believe a critical component of our success is our company culture. Our vision statement, “We drive positive health outcomes by transforming the way we connect to care” gets to the core of everything we do. We aim to attract and retain great peoplerepresenting a diverse array of perspectives and skillswho work together as a cohesive team by embodying the following values:

Because we care….

We treat everyone with dignity and RESPECT;
We earn the TRUST of our members and each other;
We provide RELIABLE services that open doors;
We serve with courtesy and COMPASSION;
We prioritize SAFETY; and
We communicate with purpose and TRANSPARENCY……… always.

Our ability to recruit and retain our employees depends on a number of factors, including providing competitive compensation and benefits, development and career advancement opportunities, and a collegial work environment. We invest in those areas in an effort to ensure that we continue to be the employer of choice for our employees.

Compensation and Benefits

Our benefits are designed to help employees and their families stay healthy, meet their financial goals, protect their income and help them have harmony between their work and personal lives. These benefits include health and wellness, paid time off, employee assistance, competitive pay, broad-based bonus programs, pension and retirement savings plans, career growth opportunities, and a culture of recognition.

Employee Development and Advancement

We invest significant resources to develop employees with the right capabilities to deliver the growth and innovation needed to support our strategy. We seek to ensure that we are building the organizational capabilities required for success in the years to come. We offer employees and their managers a number of tools to help in their personal and professional development, including career development plans, mentoring programs and in-house learning opportunities, including an in-house continuing education program. We also have a practice of investing in our next generation of leaders and offer employees a number of leadership development programs. We believe in and encourage our employees and managers to maintain a growth
20


mindset, a belief that qualities and talents can be developed through dedication and hard work, and have aligned our performance management programs to support our culture transformation with increased focus on continuous learning and development.

As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately 17,500 employees, of which approximately 3,500 were dedicated to our NEMT Segment and 14,000 were dedicated to our Personal Care Segment. Approximately 1,400 of our Personal Care Segment caregivers (about 10% of our caregivers) were unionized in New York at the end of 2020, and we believe that we have good relationships with all of our employees.

Demographics and Diversity

Our employees reflect the communities in which eligible persons votedwe live and work, and the customers we serve, and they possess a broad range of thought and experiences that have helped us achieve our successes to date. A key component of our growth and success is our focus on inclusion and diversity. We believe this commitment allows us to better our understanding of patient and customer needs, and develop technologies and solutions to meet those needs. Although we have made progress in favorour workforce diversity representation, we continue to seek to improve in this important area. We have established goals to continue improving our hiring, development, and retention of diverse employees and our overall diversity representation, including within our executive management team, in an effort to be a proposal thatsocially responsible community member.

In response to COVID-19, we took action to protect our employees’ health and safety, including by equipping employees with personal protective equipment, establishing minimum staffing and social distancing policies, sanitizing workspaces more frequently, adopting alternate work schedules and instituting other measures aimed at minimizing the UK leave the EU, also known as “Brexit”. The resulttransmission of the referendum increased politicalCOVID-19 while sustaining productivity on behalf of our customers and economic uncertaintytheir patients. In addition, we implemented a flexible teleworking policy for employees who can meet our customer commitments remotely, allowing a significant portion of our workforce to begin teleworking in the UK for the foreseeable future, in particular during any period where the terms of any UK exit from the EU are negotiated. In turn, Brexit could cause disruptionsmid-March 2020 and continuing to and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future payers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results, operations and prospects, including being adversely affected in ways that cannot be anticipated at present. For more information on the risks related to the UK’s exit from the European Union, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our business could be adversely affected by the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union.”do so through December 31, 2020.


Additional Information

The Company’s website at www.prscholdings.com provides access to its periodic reports, certain corporate governance documents, press releases, interim shareholder reports and links to its subsidiaries’ websites. The Company makes available to the public on its website at www.modivcare.com its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the SEC. Copies are also available, without charge, upon request to The Providence Service Corporation, 700 CanalModivCare Inc., 4700 South Syracuse Street, Third Floor, Stamford, CT 06902, (203) 307-2800,Suite 440, Denver, Colorado 80237, (303) 728-7043, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The information contained on our website is not part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.
 




21


Item 1A.Risk Factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

You should consider and read carefully all of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks described below have been organized under headings that are provided for convenience and intended to organize the risks and uncertainties into related categories to improve readability for investors; no inference should be drawn, however, that the placement of a risk factor under a particular category means that it is not applicable to another category of risks or that it may be more or less material than another risk factor. Regardless, they are also not the only onesrisks and uncertainties facing us. The occurrence of any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements and estimates that involve risks and uncertainties.uncertainties, as discussed above in this Part I under the caption “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-lookingforward‑looking statements as a result of specificmany factors, including the risksrisk factors and uncertainties described below.

Risks Related to Our Industry

The cost of healthcare is funded substantially by government and private insurance programs, and if such funding is reduced or limited or no longer available, our business may be adversely impacted.

Third-party payors, including Medicaid, Medicare and private health insurance providers, provide substantial funding for our services. Other payors, including MCOs, are also dependent upon Medicaid funding. These payors are increasingly seeking to reduce the cost of healthcare, which drives pressure on the reimbursement rates for healthcare services, including our services. We cannot assure you that our services will be considered cost-effective by third-party payors, that reimbursement will continue to be available or that payor reimbursement policies will not have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell our services on a profitable basis, if at all. We cannot control reimbursement rates, including Medicare market basket or other rate adjustments. Reimbursement for services that we provide is primarily through Medicaid and MCOs and rates can vary state by state and payor by payor. There are currently various legislative efforts under way to increase minimum wages in markets in which we operate, and that could impact significantly the wage rates for personal care attendants we utilize to provide our personal care services. Payors may be unable or unwilling to increase reimbursement rates sufficiently to offset the impact on us or, in cases where payors do increase reimbursement rates, such increases may not occur concurrently with the increase in wage rates. These changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

The implementation of alternative payment models and the transition of Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries to MCOs may limit our market share and could adversely affect our revenues.

Many government and commercial payors are transitioning providers to alternative payment models that are designed to promote cost-efficiency, quality and coordination of care. For example, accountable care organizations, or ACOs, seek to motivate hospitals, physician groups, and other providers to organize and coordinate patient care while reducing unnecessary costs. Several states have implemented, or have announced that they plan to implement, accountable care models for their Medicaid populations. If we are not included in these programs, or if ACOs establish programs that overlap with the services provided by us, we are at risk for losing market share and of experiencing a loss of business.

We may be similarly impacted by increased enrollment of Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care plans, shifting away from traditional fee-for-service models. Under the Medicare managed care program, also known as Medicare Advantage or MA, the federal government contracts with private health insurers to provide Medicare benefits. Insurers may choose to offer supplemental benefits and impose higher plan costs on beneficiaries. Enrollment in managed Medicaid plans is also growing, as states are increasingly relying on MCOs to deliver Medicaid program services as a strategy to control costs and manage resources. We may experience increased competition for managed care contracts due to state regulation and limitations. For instance, in October 2018, New York began imposing limits on the number of home healthcare providers with which a managed Medicaid plan can contract. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts to be included in plan networks, that we will be able to secure favorable contracts with all or some of the MCOs, that our reimbursement under these programs will remain at current levels, that the authorizations for services will remain at current levels or that our profitability will remain at levels consistent with past performance, and if we are not successful in these areas our business could be materially harmed and our financial condition materially adversely affected.

In addition, operational processes may not be well defined as a state transitions beneficiaries to managed care. For example, membership, new referrals and the related authorization for services to be provided may be delayed, which may result
22


in delays in service delivery to consumers or in payment for services rendered. Difficulties with operational processes may negatively affect our revenue growth rates, cash flow and profitability for services provided. Other alternative payment models, such as value-based billing, capitated rates and per member per month pricing, may be required by the government, MCOs and other commercial payors to control their costs while shifting financial risk to us, which could also materially affect our operations and business condition.

We are limited in our ability to control reimbursement rates received for our services, and if we are not able to maintain or reduce our costs to provide such services, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Medicare and Medicaid are among our most significant payors, and their rates are established through federal and state statutes and regulations. As a result, we have to manage our costs of providing care to achieve a desired level of profitability. Additionally, reimbursement rates with MCOs and other payors are difficult for us to negotiate as such payors are themselves limited in their ability to control rates and funding received from Medicaid and Medicare and are under pressure to reduce their own costs. We therefore manage our costs in order to achieve a desired level of profitability, including centralizing various back office processes, using technology and practicing efficient management of our workforce. If we are not able to continue to streamline our processes and reduce our costs, our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Future cost containment initiatives undertaken by private third-party payors may limit our future revenue and profitability.

Our commercial payor and managed Medicaid revenue and profitability are affected by continuing efforts of third-party payors to maintain or reduce costs of healthcare by lowering payment rates, narrowing the scope and utilization of covered services, increasing case management review of services and negotiating pricing. There can be no assurance that third-party payors will make timely payments for our services, and there is no assurance that we will continue to maintain our current payor or revenue mix. We will continue our efforts to develop our commercial payor and managed Medicaid sources of revenue and any changes in payment levels from current or future third-party payors could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may be more vulnerable to the effects of a public health emergency than other businesses due to the nature of our end-users and the physical proximity required by our operations, which could harm our business disproportionally to other businesses.

The majority of our end-users are older individuals with complex medical challenges, many of whom may be more vulnerable than the general public during a pandemic or in a public health emergency. Our employees are also at greater risk of contracting contagious diseases due to their increased exposure to vulnerable end-users. Our employees could also have difficulty attending to our end-users if a program of social distancing or quarantine is instituted in response to a public health emergency, or if “stay at home” orders are perpetuated or reinitiated. In addition, we may expand existing internal policies in a manner that may have a similar effect. If the COVID-19 virus sustains, or if there is an additional resurgence of infections of COVID-19 or its potentially more contagious variants, or if an influenza or other pandemic were to occur, we could suffer significant losses to our consumer population or a willingness by our end-users to utilize our services, in particular in our Personal Care Segment, or a reduction in the availability of our employees and, at a high cost, we could be required to hire replacements for affected workers. Accordingly, public health emergencies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by inadequacies in, or security breaches of, our information technology systems, including the systems intended to protect our clients’ privacy and confidential information, which could lead to legal liability, adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our information technology, or IT, systems are critically important to our operations and we must implement and maintain appropriate and sufficient infrastructure and IT systems to support growth and our existing business processes.We provide services to individuals and others that require us to collect, process, maintain and retain sensitive and personal client confidential information in our computer systems, including patient identifiable health information, financial information and other personal information about our end-users, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, identification numbers and payment account information.As a result, we are subject to complex and evolving United States privacy laws and regulations, including those pertaining to the handling of personal data, such as HIPAA, CCPA, and others. Most states have enacted laws, which vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information.An increasing number of states require that impacted individuals and regulatory authorities be notified if a
23


security breach results in the unauthorized access to, or use or disclosure of, personal information.Notifications are also required under HIPAA to the extent there is unauthorized access to, or use or disclosure of, personal health information. California residents and households in particular are afforded significantly expanded privacy protections under the CCPA.The enacted laws often provide for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that may increase data breach litigation.Further, while we are using internal and external resources to monitor compliance with and to continue to modify our data processing practices and policies in order to comply with evolving privacy laws, relevant regulatory authorities could determine that our data handling practices fail to address all the requirements of certain new laws, which could subject us to penalties and/or litigation.In addition, there is no assurance that our security controls over personal data, the training of employees and vendors on data privacy and data security, and the policies, procedures and practices we implemented or may implement in the future will prevent the improper disclosure of personal data.Improper disclosure of personal data in violation of the CCPA and/or of other personal data protection laws could harm our reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to government enforcement actions (including fines), or result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, all of which could adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We also rely on our IT systems (some of which are outsourced to third parties) to manage the data, communications and business processes for other business functions, including our marketing, sales, logistics, customer service, accounting and administrative functions.Furthermore, our systems include interfaces to third-party stakeholders, often connected via the internet.In addition, some of our services or information related to our services are carried out or hosted within our customers’ IT systems, and any failure or weaknesses in their IT systems may negatively impact our ability to deliver the services, for which we may not receive relief from contractual performance obligations or compensation for services provided. In addition, security incidents impacting other companies, such as our vendors, may allow cybercriminals to obtain personal information about our customers and employees.Cybercriminals may then use this information to, among other things, attempt to gain unauthorized access to our customers’ accounts, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations or financial condition. As a result of the data we maintain and third-party access, we are subject to increasing cybersecurity risks associated with malicious cyber-attacks intended to gain access to protected personal information.The nature of our business, where services are often performed outside of locations where network security can be assured, adds additional risk.If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, sustain and protect an appropriate technology infrastructure, our business or financial results could be negatively impacted.

Furthermore, computer hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operate large scale and complex automated attacks, and our information technology systems may be vulnerable to material security breaches (including the access to or acquisition of customer, employee or other confidential data), cyber-attacks or other material system failures arising out of malware or ransomware attacks, denial of services, or other attacks or security incidents, any of which could adversely impact our operations and financial results, our relationships with business partners and customers, and our reputation. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to implement adequate preventative measures sufficient to prevent a breach of our systems and protect sensitive data, including confidential personal information.Any breach of our data security could result in an unauthorized release or transfer of customer or employee information, or the loss of valuable business data or cause a disruption in our business.A failure to prevent, detect and respond in a timely manner to a major breach of our data security or to other cybersecurity threats could result in system disruption, business continuity issues or compromised data integrity.These events or any other failure to safeguard personal data could give rise to unwanted media attention, damage our reputation, damage our customer relationships and result in lost sales, fines or lawsuits.We may also be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against or respond to or alleviate problems caused by a security breach.If we are unable to prevent material failures, our operations may be impacted, and we may suffer other negative consequences such as reputational damage, litigation, remediation costs, a requirement not to operate our business until defects are remedied, or penalties under various data privacy laws and regulations, any of which could detrimentally affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

There can be no assurance thatWe derive a significant amount of our contracts will survive untilrevenues from a limited number of payors, and any changes in the end of their stated terms,funding, financial viability or that upon their expiration will be renewed or extended on satisfactory terms, if at all. Disruptions to, the early expiration of or the failure to renew our contractsrelationships with these payors could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
24


Our NET Services contracts, and certain WD Services contracts, are subject to frequent renewal.We generate a significant amount of our revenue from a limited number of payors under a relatively small number of contracts. For example, many of the state Medicaid contracts held by NET Services, which represented 55.9% of NET Services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, have terms ranging from three to five years and are typically subject to a competitive bidding process near the end of the term. NET Services also contracts with MCOs, which represented 44.1% of NET Services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. MCO contracts typically continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice (as determined in accordance with the contract). We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent we will be successful in renewing our state government contracts or retaining our MCO contracts. During 2017, we experienced a decline in operating income as a percentage of revenue due to the nonrenewal of certain state contracts. In addition, with respect to many2020, approximately 31.1% of our contracts, the payer may terminate the contract without cause, at willNEMT Segment revenue was derived from only five payors, and without penaltyone of which, a single state Medicaid agency, contributed 9.5% to the payer, either immediatelyour aggregate NEMT Segment revenue during that period. The loss of, reduction in amounts generated by, or upon the expiration of a short notice periodchanges in the event that, among other reasons, government appropriations supporting the programs serviced by the contract are reducedmethods or eliminated or the payer deemsregulations governing payments for our performance under the contract to be unsatisfactory.
We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent a payer might terminate its contract with us prior to its expiration, or fail to renew or extend a contract with us. If we are unable to retain or renew our contracts, or replace lost contracts, on satisfactory terms our financial conditions and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. While we pursue new contract awards and also undertake efficiency measures, there can be no assurance that such measures will fully offset the impact of contracts that are not renewed or are cancelled on our operating income and results of operations.
We obtain a significant portion of our business through responses to government requests for proposals and we may not be awarded contracts through this process in the future, or contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.
We obtain, and will continue to seek to obtain, a significant portion of our business from national, state, and local government entities. To obtain business from government entities, we are often required to respond to requests for proposals (“RFPs”). To propose effectively, we must accurately estimate our cost structure for servicing a proposed contract, the time required to establish operations and the terms of the proposals submitted by competitors. We must also assemble and submit a large volume of information within rigid and often short timetables. Our ability to respond successfully to RFPs will greatly impact our business. If we misinterpret bid requirements as to performance criteria or do not accurately estimate performance costs in a binding bid for an RFP, we will seek to correct such mistakes in the final contract. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify the proposed contract and we may be required to perform under a contract that is not profitable.
WD Services’ ability to win contracts to administer and manage programs traditionally administered by government employees is also dependent on the impact of government unions. Many WD Services government employees belong to labor unions with considerable financial resources and lobbying networks. Union opposition could result in our losing government contracts, being precluded from providing services under governmentthese contracts or maintaining or renewing existing contracts. If we could not renew certain contracts or obtain new contracts due to opposition political actions, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.revenue and results of operations. In addition, any consolidation of any of our private payors could increase the impact that any such risks would have on our revenue, financial position, and results of operations.

If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damagesOur business, results of operations and financial penalties, whichcondition may place existing pledged performancebe adversely affected by pandemic infectious diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic.

The widespread outbreak of an illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis that results in economic disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could materially adversely affect our business and payment bonds at riskresults of operations. COVID-19 and its potentially more contagious variants specifically, as well as harm measures taken by governmental authorities and private actors to limit the spread of the virus, have interfered with, and may continue to interfere with, the ability of our employees, suppliers, transportation providers and other business providers to carry out their assigned tasks at ordinary levels of performance relative to the conduct of our business, which may cause us to materially curtail portions of our business operations. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business will depend on a number of evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict, including:

the duration and scope of the pandemic;
governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic;
the impact of the pandemic on economic activity and actions taken in response;
the effect on our customers and members and customer and member demand for our services, in particular with respect to our Personal Care Segment services;
our ability to keepprovide our existing contractsservices as a result of, among other things, travel restrictions, disruptions in our contact centers related to COVID-19, people working from homeand taking the opportunity to provide personal care services that we might otherwise provide through our Personal Care Segment, and the willingness of our employees to return to work due to health concerns, childcare issues or obtain new contractsenhanced unemployment benefits, including after “shelter in place” and future bonds.other related “stay at home restrictions” are lifted or modified;
issues with respect to our employees’ health, working hours and/or ability to perform their duties;
Ourincreased costs to us in response to these changing conditions and to protect the health and safety of our employees, including increased spending for hazard pay and personal protective equipment; and
the ability of our payors to pay for our services.

Furthermore, any failure to comply with our contractual obligationsappropriately respond, or the perception of an inadequate response, could cause reputational harm and/or subject us to claims and litigation, either of which could result in addition to providing grounds for immediate termination of the contract for cause, negatively impact our financial performance and damage our reputation, which, in turn, could have a


material adverse effect on our abilitybusiness and results of operations.

Since March 2020, we have observed a material reduction in trip volume in our NEMT Segment as a result of state imposed “stay at home” orders, many of which reduced medical services to maintain current contractslife-sustaining programs only (for example, dialysis and chemotherapy). This reduction in trip volume has had a negative financial impact on our transportation providers and we believe that some of our transportation providers may not survive this period of reduced volume. While there has been some increase in trip volume as states have lifted or obtainmodified these restrictions and allowed businesses to reopen, we have not seen trip volumes return to pre-pandemic levels. It is currently expected that trip volumes will remain depressed relative to pre-pandemic levels as states attempt to mitigate the resurgence of the virus or to tamp down the impact of new contracts. The terminationstrains of the virus that have been recently identified in the United States. If trip volumes remain depressed, we will continue to see pressure on our transportation providers and lower revenue. If, on the other hand, trip volumes increase as a result of state reopening measures, depending on the period of time over which this increase in volume occurs, we may face difficulty meeting volume demands due to the capacity constraints within our network of transportation providers. Additionally, there may be an increase in the required level of service for those utilizing NEMT services during the pandemic as a result of a contractsicker population or in an effort to reduce the potential transmission of COVID-19 or any of its variants. As trip volumes increase, we may face staffing difficulties in our contact centers as the recruitment of potential employees may be challenging amid health concerns and other factors related to the pandemic, which could negatively impact the customer and member experience while interfacing with our contact centers and materially adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.

Our Personal Care Segment business also experienced a material reduction in historical volume of service hours and visits beginning in March 2020. While our caregivers are generally considered essential workers and not constrained by “stay at home” orders, volume was reduced as patients put services on hold due to infection concerns, and/or because they had the
25


alternative of receiving care from family members and others working remotely or furloughed from their jobs. Cases were also lost due to patient deaths, and new case referrals slowed as referral sources faced disruption from the various restrictions and “stay at home” orders. Similar to our experience in the NEMT Segment, while personal care service volumes have improved since March, they have not recovered to pre-pandemic levels and may not until vaccines are more universally applied in the markets where we provide our services. If volume remains depressed, we will continue to experience lower revenue. If volume increases, depending on the period of time over which this increase in volume occurs, we may face difficulty meeting volume demands due to staffing difficulties, as the recruitment of potential employees may be challenging amid health concerns and other factors related to the pandemic. Any of these circumstances and factors could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The uncertainty and volatility of NEMT trip volume and personal care services volume due to COVID-19 and its potentially more contagious variants can affect the assumptions on which we rely to develop our expense estimates relative to these business lines. If we do not accurately estimate costs incurred in providing these services, these segments may be less profitable than anticipated and our actual results may be adversely affected. Any or all of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is continuously evolving, and the continuation of the pandemic, any additional resurgence, or COVID-19 variants could precipitate or aggravate the other risk factors included in this report, which in turn could further materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and profitability, including in ways that are not currently known to us or that we do not currently consider to present significant risks.

Our contact center employees may be disproportionately impacted by health epidemics or pandemics like COVID-19, which could disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial results.

Our contact centers typically seat a significant number of employees in one location. Accordingly, an outbreak or resurgence of a contagious infection or virus, such as COVID-19or its potentially more contagious variants, in one or more of the locations in which we do business may result in significant worker absenteeism, lower capacity utilization rates, voluntary or mandatory closure of our contact centers, transportation restrictions that could make it difficult for causeour employees to commute to work, travel restrictions on our employees, and other disruptions to our business. Any prolonged or widespread health epidemic could for instance,severely disrupt our business operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Delays in collection, or non-collection, of our accounts receivable, particularly during any business integration process, could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Prompt billing and collection are important factors in our liquidity. Billing and collection of our accounts receivable are subject to the complex regulations that govern Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and rules imposed by nongovernment payors. Our inability to bill and collect on a timely basis pursuant to these regulations and rules could subject us to liabilitiespayment delays that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. It is possible that documentation support, system problems, Medicare, Medicaid or other payor issues, particularly in markets transitioning to managed care for excess costs incurred by a payerthe first time, or industry trends may extend our collection period, which may materially adversely affect our working capital, and our working capital management procedures may not successfully mitigate this risk.

The timing of payments made under the Medicare and Medicaid programs is subject to governmental budgetary constraints, resulting in obtaining similar services from another source.an increased period of time between submission of claims and subsequent payment under specific programs, most notably under the Medicaid and Medicaid managed programs, which typically pay claims approximately 30 to 60 days slower than the average hospital claim. In addition, our contracts require us to indemnify payers for ourwe may experience delays in reimbursement as a result of the failure to meet standardsreceive prompt approvals related to change of care, and someownership applications for acquired or other facilities or from delays caused by our or other third parties’ information system failures. We may also experience delayed payment of them contain liquidated damages provisionsreimbursement rate increases that are subject to the approval of the CMS and/or various state agencies before claims can be submitted or paid at the new rates. Any delays experienced for the foregoing or other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial penalties that we must pay if we breach these contracts.condition.


Further, a delay in collecting our accounts receivable, or the non-collection of accounts receivable in connection with our transition and integration of acquired companies, including Simplura, and the attendant movement of underlying billing and collection operations from legacy systems to our systems could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and liquidity.

26


Our failurereported financial results could suffer if there is an impairment of long-lived assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, to meet contractual obligationsreview the carrying value of long-lived assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could alsoaffect the value of an asset or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset. Where the presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset may be impaired, we assess its recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of the asset exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset over the remaining economic life of the asset. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, we estimate the fair value of the asset using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows. If the fair value of those assets is less than carrying value, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. The use of different estimates or assumptions in determining the fair value of our intangible assets may result in substantial actual and consequential financial damages. For example, on January 25, 2018, the MOJ released a report on reoffending statisticsdifferent values for certain offenders who entered probation services duringthose assets, which could result in an impairment or, in the period October 2015 to March 2016. The report provides statistics for all providersin which an impairment is recognized, could result in a materially different impairment charge.

In addition, goodwill may be impaired if the estimated fair value of probation services, including our subsidiary RRP, whichreporting units is in our WD Services segment. This information isless than the second data set that is utilized to determine performance payments undercarrying value of the various providers’ transforming rehabilitation contracts with the MOJ, as the actual rates of recidivism are compared to benchmark rates established by the MOJ. Performance payments and penalties are linked to two separate measures of recidivism - the binary measure and the frequency measure. The binary measure defines the percentage of offenders within a cohort, formed quarterly, who reoffend in the following 12 months. The frequency measure defines the average number of offenses committed by reoffenders within the same 12-month measurement period. The performance for the frequency measure for most providers has been below the benchmarks established by the MOJ.respective reporting unit. As a result RRPof our growth, in part through acquisitions, goodwill and other intangible assets represent a significant portion of our assets. For example, goodwill generated in relation to the acquisition of Simplura Health Group in 2020 was $309.7 million. We perform an analysis on our goodwill balances to test for impairment on an annual basis. Interim impairment tests may also be required in advance of our annual impairment test if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value, including goodwill, of our reporting unit below the reporting unit’s carrying value. Such circumstances could include: (1) loss of significant contracts; (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the climate of our business; (3) unanticipated competition; (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; or (5) a significant decline in our stock price.

As of December 31, 2020, the carrying value of goodwill, intangibles, equity method investments, and property and equipment, net was $444.9 million, $345.7 million, $137.5 million and $27.5 million, respectively. We continue to monitor the carrying value of these long-lived assets. If future conditions are different from management’s estimates at the time of an acquisition or market conditions change subsequently, we may incur future charges for impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets, equity method investments or property and equipment, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Failure to maintain or to develop further reliable, efficient and secure IT systems would be disruptive to our operations and diminish our ability to compete and successfully grow our business.

We are highly dependent on efficient and uninterrupted performance of our IT and business systems. These systems quote, process and service our business, and perform financial functions necessary for pricing and service delivery. These systems must also be able to undergo periodic modifications and improvements without interruptions or untimely delays in service. Additionally, our ability to integrate our systems with those of our clients is critical to our success. Our information systems rely on the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources to maintain and enhance existing systems as well as develop and create new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory requirements. Nevertheless, we still rely on manual processes and procedures, including accounting, reporting and consolidation processes that may result in errors and may not scale proportionately with our business growth, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A failure or delay to achieve improvements in our IT platforms could interrupt certain processes or degrade business operations and could place us at a competitive disadvantage. If we are unable to implement appropriate systems, procedures and controls, we may not be able to successfully offer our services and grow our business and account for transactions in an appropriate and timely manner, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks related to attracting and retaining qualified employees, which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our business success depends, to a significant degree, on our ability to identify, attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and experienced employees who possess the skills and experience necessary to deliver high-quality services to our clients, with the continued contributions of our senior management being especially critical to our success. Our objective of
27


providing the highest quality of service to our clients is a significant consideration when we evaluate the education, experience and qualifications of potential candidates for employment as direct care and administrative staff. A portion of our staff is professionals with requisite educational backgrounds and professional certifications. These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future.

Our ability to attract and retain employees with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors, including our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. While we have established programs to attract new employees and provide incentives to retain existing employees, particularly our senior management, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract new employees or retain the services of our senior management or any other key employees in the future. Some of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel may have greater financial, technical, political and marketing resources, name recognition and a larger number of clients and payors than we do, which may prove more attractive to employment candidates. The inability to attract and retain experienced personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The performance of our business also depends on the talents and efforts of our highly skilled IT professionals. Our success depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate these individuals. Effective succession planning is also important to our future success. If we fail to ensure the effective transfer of senior management knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management, our ability to execute short and long-term strategic, financial and operating goals, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations generally, could be required to make payments to the MOJ and the amounts of such payments could be material. The amount of potential payments to the MOJ, if any, under RRP’s contracts with the MOJ cannot be estimated at this time, as the MOJ is reviewing the data to understand the underlying reasons for the increase in certain rates of recidivism and other factors that could impact the contractual measure.materially adversely affected.


Any acquisition or acquisition integration efforts that we undertake could disrupt our business, not generate anticipated results, dilute stockholder value orand have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

We endeavor to ensureOur growth strategy involves the evaluation of potential entry into complementary markets and service lines through acquisition, particularly with opportunities that may leverage the advantages inherent in our acquisition strategylarge-scale technology-enabled operations and alignment of resources serves to enhance shareholder value, which could result in changes to our strategy or to the way in which we deploy resources across Providence.networks. We have made acquisitions and anticipate that we will continue to make, acquisitions. The Company typically incurs costs related to acquisitionsconsider and integrations, including third-party costs, whether or notpursue strategic acquisition opportunities, the acquisition or integration is completed, which can have a material adverse impact on our operating results. The success of an acquisitionwhich depends in part on our ability to integrate an acquired company into our business operations. Integration of any acquired companiescompany will place significant demands on our management, systems, internal controls and financial and physical resources. This could require us to incur significant expense for, among other things, hiring additional qualified personnel, retaining professionals to assist in developing the appropriate control systems and expanding our information technologyIT infrastructure. The nature of our business is such that qualified management personnel can be difficult to find. Our inability to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

For example, the successful integration of our Personal Care Segment business acquired in the Simplura transaction into those of our own and our ability to realize the expected benefits of the acquisition are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control, including:

the challenges and unanticipated costs associated with integrating complex organizations, systems, operating procedures, compliance programs, technology, networks and other assets;
the difficulties harmonizing differences in the business cultures;
the inability to successfully combine our respective businesses in a manner that permits us to achieve the cost savings and other anticipated benefits from the acquisition;
the challenges associated with known and unknown legal or financial liabilities associated with the acquisition;
the risk of entering markets in which we have little or no experience;
the challenges associated with the incurrence of indebtedness and the assumption of new contracts associated with the acquisition;
the inability to minimize the diversion of management attention from ongoing business concerns during the process of integrating our businesses;
the inability to resolve potential conflicts that may arise relating to customer, supplier and other important relationships;
the difficulties in retaining key management and other key employees; and
the challenge of managing the expanded operations of a larger and more complex company and coordinating geographically separate organizations.

We incurred substantial expenses to complete the acquisition, but we may not realize the anticipated cost benefits and other benefits to the extent expected, on the timeline expected, or at all. Moreover, competition in this industry may also cause us not to fully realize the anticipated benefits of this acquisition.

28


There can also be no assurance that the companies acquiredwe acquire, including our Personal Care Segment, will generate income or incur expenses at the historical or projected levels on which we based our acquisition decisions, that we will be able to maintain or renew the acquired companies’ contracts, that we will be able to realize operating and economic efficiencies upon integration of acquired companies or that the acquisitions will not adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

We continually review opportunities to acquire other businesses that would complement our current services,In addition, as we expand our markets or otherwise offertake advantage of prospects for growth. Ingrowth, in connection with our acquisition strategy, we could issue stock that wouldcould dilute existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, or we could incur or assume substantial debt or contingent liabilities. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

challenges and unanticipated costs assimilating the acquired operations;
known and unknown legal or financial liabilities associated with an acquisition;
diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses;
adverse effects on existing business relationships with customers;
entering markets in which we have limited orThere can be no experience;
potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations;
incurrence of excessive leverage in financing an acquisition;
failure to maintain and renew contracts and other revenue streams of the acquired business;
costs associated with litigation or other claims arising in connection with the acquired company;
unanticipated operating, accounting or management difficulties in connection with an acquisition; and
dilution to our earnings per share.
We cannot assure youassurance that we will be successful in overcoming problems encountered in connection with any acquisition or integration and our inability to do so could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business. Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail


to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally.

Our estimated income taxes could be materially different from income taxes that we ultimately pay, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may be unableare subject to realizeincome taxation in both the benefitsUnited States and, due to our ownership of any strategic initiativesinternational entities prior to the sale of our workforce development services segment, ten foreign countries, including specific states or provinces where we operated that segment. Our total income tax provision is a function of applicable local tax rates and the geographic mix of our income from continuing and discontinued operations before taxes, which is itself impacted by currency movements. Consequently, the isolated or combined effects of unfavorable movements in tax rates, geographic mix, or foreign exchange rates could reduce our after-tax income and negatively impact our financial results.

Our total income tax provision is based on our taxable income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate or operated. Significant judgment and estimation is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions and related matters. In the ordinary course of our business, there are adoptedmany transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determinations are uncertain or otherwise subject to interpretation. In addition, we make or were required to make judgments regarding the applicability of tax treaties and the appropriate application of transfer pricing regulations with respect to the operations of our former workforce development services segment. In the event one taxing jurisdiction disagrees with another taxing jurisdiction with respect to the amount or applicability of a particular type of tax, or the amount or availability of a particular type of tax refund or credit, we could experience temporary or permanent double taxation and increased professional fees to resolve such taxation matters.

Our determination of our income tax liability is always subject to review by applicable tax authorities, and we have been audited by various jurisdictions in prior years. We are currently under examination by the Company.

From time to time we may launch strategic initiatives in order to enhance shareholder value. For example, in 2017, NET Services pursuedInternal Revenue Service as a strategic initiative to enhance member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies. The implementationresult of the initiative is expected to be substantially completed bylarge refund received from the end of 2018. Also in 2017, in order to build upon its leadership position inloss on the UK employmentsale or our former workforce development services industry, enhance client satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies, WD Services substantially completed the Ingeus Futures program.segment. In addition, we are actively evaluatingbeing examined by various states and by the optimal industry sectors, such as the non-emergency medical transportation industrySaudi Arabian tax authorities with respect to these matters. Although we believe our income tax estimates and others in which businesses complementary to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our go-forward mergerrelated determinations are reasonable and acquisition activity, in an attempt to direct our capital towards those areas most likely to drive long-term value creation and generate the highest levels of return for our shareholders.appropriate, relevant taxing authorities may disagree. The ultimate outcome of this active evaluation may impactany such audits and reviews could be materially different from the extentestimates and mannerdeterminations reflected in which we deploy resources across Providence, including strategicour historical income tax provisions and administrative resources between Corporateaccruals. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and Other andthe results of our operating segments. operations.

Risks Related to Our NEMT Segment

There can be no assurance that our contracts will survive as to whether any strategic initiativescontemplated until the end of their stated terms, or that upon their expiration will be adopted as a resultrenewed or extended on satisfactory terms, if at all, and disruptions to, the early expiration or renegotiation of, this evaluation, and the outcome of any current or future strategic initiatives is uncertain.

Our investments in any joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
We currently hold a noncontrolling interest in Matrix, which constitutes 24.0% of our consolidated assets. We do not have unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly impact such business’ economic performance. Our future growth may depend, in part, on future similar arrangements, any of which could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. These arrangements involve risks not present with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiaries, which may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations or make the arrangements less successful than anticipated, including the following:

we may be unable to take actions that we believe are appropriate but are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to cede or share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the business or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the business;
failure to renew our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
we may be unable to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;
our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could adversely impact the joint venture or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;
our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a business that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the business;
disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the business, including the delay of important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.
We derive a significant amount of our revenues from a few payers, which puts our financial condition and results of operations at risk. Any changes in the funding, financial viability or our relationships with these payerscontracts could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We generateOur NEMT Segment contracts are subject to frequent renewal and, from time to time, requests for renegotiation during a significant amount of the revenues in our segments from a few payers under a small number of contracts.contract term. For example, many of our state Medicaid contracts, which represented 49.3% of our NEMT Segment revenue for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, have terms ranging from three to five years and 2015, we generated 46.7%, 47.9% and 54.6%, respectively,are typically subject to a competitive procurement process near the end of the term. We also contract with MCOs, which represented 50.7% of our consolidated revenue from ten payers. Additionally, five payers related to NET Services represented, in the aggregate, 36.1%, 35.6% and 39.2%, respectively, of NET ServicesNEMT Segment revenue for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020. Our MCO contracts for NEMT Segment services typically continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice in accordance with the terms of the contract, and 2015. A single payer relatedsometimes a contractual counterparty will seek to WD Services represented 27.1%, 28.9%renegotiate the pricing and 40.0%other terms of a contract to our WD Services revenue fordetriment prior to the yearsstated termination date of a contract. We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent we will be successful in renewing our state Medicaid contracts or retaining our MCO contracts through their contractual duration on terms originally negotiated or at all. For the
29


year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, a single payer related to Matrix represented 30.9%, 27.8% and 31.1% of Matrix revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The loss of, reduction in amounts generated by, or changes in methods or regulations governing payments for our services under these contracts could have a material adverse impact on our


revenue and results of operations. In addition, any consolidation of any2020, 22.0% of our private payers could increase the impact that any such risks would have on ourNEMT Segment revenue and results of operations.
If we fail to estimate accurately the cost of performing certain contracts, we may experience reduced or negative margins.
During 2017, 2016 and 2015, 77.9%, 78.3% and 83.6% of our NET Services revenue, respectively, was generated under capitatedstate Medicaid contracts that are subject to renewal during 2021.

In addition, with respect to many of our state contracts, the remainder generated through FFSpayor may terminate the contract without cause, or for convenience, at will and flat fee contracts. WD Services also provides services under FFS and flat fee contracts. Under most of NET Services’ capitated contracts, we assumewithout penalty to the responsibility of managingpayor, either immediately or upon the needsexpiration of a specific geographic population by contracting out transportation services to local transportation companies on a per ride or per mile basis. We use “pricing models” to determine applicable contract rates, which take into account factors such as estimated utilization, state specific data, previous experienceshort notice period in the state or with similar services,event that, among other reasons, government appropriations supporting the medically covered programs outlined inserviced by the contract identified populationsare reduced or eliminated. We cannot anticipate if, when or to be serviced, estimated volume, estimated transportation provider rates and availability of mass transit. The amount of the fixed per-member, monthly fee is determined in the bidding process, but is predicated on actual historical transportation data for the subject geographic region as provided by the payer, actuarial work performed in-house as well as by third party actuarial firms and actuarial analysis provided by the payer. If the utilization of our services is more than we estimated, thewhat extent a payor might terminate a contract may be less profitable than anticipated,with us prior to its expiration, or may not be profitable at all. Under our FFS contracts, we receive fees based on our interactions with government-sponsored clients. To earn a profit on these contracts, we must accurately estimate costs incurred in providing services. Our risk relating to these contracts is that our client population is not large enough to cover our fixed costs, such as rent and overhead. Our FFS contracts are not reimbursed on a cost basis and therefore, if we fail to estimate our costs accurately,renew or extend a contract with us. If we may experience reduced margins or losses on these contracts. Revenue under certain contracts may be adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations. If the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly,retain or renew our profitability may be negatively impacted. In addition, certain contracts, with state Medicaid agencies are renewable at the state’s option without an adjustment to pricing terms. If such renewedor replace lost contracts, require us to incur higher costs, including inflation or regulatory changes, than originally anticipated, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
In WD Services, we often provide services to a client based on a unit price for delivery of a service or achievement of a defined outcome.  If we fail to estimate costs accurately, we may have minimal ability to change the unit price to ensure profitability. While we may be able to alter our cost structure to reflect lower than anticipated volumes and other changes in service needs, there are certain fixed costs which are difficult to alter while still ensuring we can meet our contractual obligations.  Further, many contracts require us to undertake significant onboarding projects, including making redundancies and changes to properties and IT.  If we fail to anticipate the cost of these change programs, we may be unable to recover startup costs throughout the life of the contract. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $19.6 million, which related, in part, to lower revenue and unanticipated costs for a recent contract. If WD Services continues to experience lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts, it could result in additional impairment charges. For more information on the risks related to impairment of goodwill, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our reported financial results could suffer if there is an impairment of long-lived assets.”
We may incur costs before receiving related revenues, which could impact our liquidity.
When we are awarded a contract to provide services, we may incur expenses before we receive any contract payments. These expenses include leasing office space, purchasing office equipment, instituting information technology systems, development of supply chains, hiring personnel and releasing certain personnel. As a result, in certain contracts where the government does not fund program start-up costs, we may be required to make significant investments before receiving any related contract payments or payments sufficient to cover start-up costs. For example, WD Services incurred start-up costs in 2017 related to the UK’s Work and Health Programme, and in 2016 related to the offender rehabilitation program in the UK and start-up costs in France. In addition, payments due to us from payers may be delayed due to billing cycles or as a result of failures to approve government budgets in a timely manner, which may adversely affect our liquidity. Moreover, any resulting mismatch in expenses and revenue, especially under FFS arrangements, could be exacerbated if we fail either to invoice the payer correctly or to collect our fee in a timely manner. Such amounts may exceed our available cash, and any resulting liquidity shortages may require additional financing, which may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at all. This could have a material adverse impact on our ongoing operations and our financial position.
Our business is subject to risks of litigation.
The services we provide are subject to lawsuits and claims. A substantial award payable by the Company could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cash flows, and could adversely impact our ability to continue to purchase appropriate liability insurance. We can be subject to claims for negligence or intentional misconduct (in addition to professional liability type claims) by an employee or a third party we engage to assist with the provision of services, including but not limited to claims arising out of accidents involving vehicle collisions, workforce development placements or CHAs and various claims that could


result from employees or contracted third parties driving to or from interactions with clients or while providing direct client services. We can be subject to employee-related claims such as wrongful discharge, discrimination or a violation of equal employment laws and permitting issues. While we attempt to insure against for these types of claims, damages exceeding our insurance limits or outside our insurance coverage, such as a claim for fraud, certain wage and hour violations or punitive damages, could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.
We face risks related to attracting and retaining qualified employees and labor relations.
Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to identify, attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and experienced professionals who possess the skills and experience necessary to deliver high-quality services to our clients, with the continued contributions of our senior management being especially critical to our success. Our objective of providing the highest quality of service to our clients is a significant consideration when we evaluate the education, experience and qualifications of potential candidates for employment as direct care and administrative staff. A portion of our staff are professionals with requisite educational backgrounds and professional certifications. These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future.
Our ability to attract and retain employees with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. While we have established programs to attract new employees and provide incentives to retain existing employees, particularly our senior management, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract new employees or retain the services of our senior management or any other key employees in the future. In particular, we are currently seeking to fill several key management positions in our NET Services business, and we expect to continue to need to attract key employees to support the growth of our businesses. Some of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel may have greater financial, technical, political and marketing resources, name recognition and a larger number of clients and payers than we do, which may prove more attractive to employment candidates. The inability to attract and retain experienced personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The performance of each of our business segments also depends on the talents and efforts of our highly skilled information technology professionals. For example, technological improvement is a key component of the strategic initiative at NET Services to enhance member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies and as NET Services expands our transportation network capacity beyond its traditional transportation provider network, increases on-time and on-demand performance, provides real time analytics and minimizes cancellations. Competition for skilled intellectual technology professionals can be intense. Our success depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate these individuals.
Effective succession planning is also important to our future success. If we fail to ensure the effective transfer of senior management knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management, including the appointment of a new chief executive officer for the Company (as our chief executive officer terminated his role during the fourth quarter of 2017) and the transition of several key management positions, including the chief technology officer, in our NET Service business, our ability to execute short and long-term strategic, financial and operating goals, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations generally, could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, our businesses rely on maintaining strong relationships with our employees and avoiding labor disputes. Certain of our UK employees are members of the NAPO and Unison unions and certain of our employees in France are members of the Confederation Generale du Travail. Unionized employees in both countries have collective bargaining rights. Participation in unions is confidential under European employment laws. While we believe we have good relationships with our employees, both unionizedpursue new contract awards and non-unionized, inalso undertake efficiency measures, there can be no assurance that such measures will fully offset the U.S. and internationally, including the unionsnegative impact of contracts that represent some of our employees, a work stoppage due to our failure to renegotiate union contractsare not renewed or for other reasons could have a significant negative effectare canceled on us. In addition, should additional portions of our workforce be subject to collective bargaining agreements, this could result in increased costs of doing business as we may be subject to mandatory, binding arbitration of labor scheduling, costs and standards and we may therefore have reduced operating flexibility.
We may have difficulty successfully completing divestitures or exiting businesses.
As demonstrated in 2017 with the sale of our interests in Mission Providence Pty Ltd to Konekt Limited, in 2016 with the Matrix Transaction and in 2015 with the Human Services Sale, we may dispose of all or a portion of our investments or exit businesses based on a variety of factors, including availability of alternative opportunities to deploy capital or otherwise maximize shareholder value as well as other strategic considerations. A divestiture or business termination could result in difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and personnel, the diversion of management’s attention, the disruption of our business and the potential loss of key employees and customers. A divestiture or business termination may be subject to the satisfaction of pre-closing conditions as well as to obtaining necessary regulatory and government approvals, which, if not satisfied or obtained,


may prevent us from completing the disposition or business termination, whether or not the disposition or business termination has been publicly announced. A divestiture or business termination may also involve continued financial involvement in the divested assets and businesses, such as indemnities or other financial obligations, including continuing obligations to employees, in which the performance of the divested assets or businesses could impact our results of operations. From time to time the Company guarantees the contractual payment or performance obligations of its segments. An inability to obtain waiver or termination of such guarantees may prevent us from completing a disposition or business termination, or may result in continued financial involvement in divested assets and businesses. Further, such divestitures may result in proceeds to us in an amount less than we expect or less than our assessment of the value of those assets. Any sale of our assets could result in a loss on divestiture. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The indemnification provisions of acquisition and disposition agreements by which we have acquired or sold companies may result in liabilities.
We rely heavily on the representations and warranties and related indemnities provided to us by the sellers of acquired companies, including as they relate to creation, ownership and rights in intellectual property and compliance with laws and contractual requirements. However, the liability of the former owners is limited under the relevant acquisition agreements, and certain sellers may be unable to meet their indemnification responsibilities. Similarly, the purchasers of our divested operations may from time to time agree to indemnify us for operations of such businesses after the closing. We cannot be assured that any of these indemnification provisions will fully protect us, and as a result we may face unexpected liabilities that adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, we have provided certain indemnifications in connection with the Human Services Sale in 2015 and the Matrix Transaction in 2016. To the extent we choose to divest other operations of our businesses in the future, we expect to provide certain indemnifications in connection with these divestitures. We may face liabilities in connection with these current or future indemnification obligations that may adversely affect our consolidated results of operation, financial condition and cash flows. We have entered into a settlement with Molina Healthcare Inc. (“Molina”), the purchaser of our former Human Services segment, regarding the settlement of certain potential indemnification claims. As of December 31, 2017, the accrual is $15.0 million with respect to an estimate of loss for such potential indemnification claims.  Litigation is inherently uncertain, and the losses incurred in the event that the legal proceedings related to such claims were to result in unfavorable outcomes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial performance. For more information on these potential indemnification obligations, see Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to our consolidated financial statements.

Our success depends on our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace.marketplace, and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to compete effectively in the markets for our services.

We compete for clients and for contracts with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. Many organizations of varying sizes compete with us, including local not-for-profit organizations and community-based organizations, larger companies, organizations that currently provide or may begin to provide similar NET managementNEMT services (including transportation network companies likesuch as Uber and Lyft), and large multi-national corporations that currently provide or may begin to provide workforce development services and CHA providers. Some of these companies may have greater financial, technical, political, marketing, name recognition and other resources and a larger number of clients or payerspayors than we do. In addition, some of these companies offer more services than we do. To remain competitive, we must provide superior services and performance on a cost-effective basis to our customers.


The market in which we operate is influenced by technological developments that affect cost-efficiency and quality of services, and the needs of our customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to develop services that address these changing needs and to provide technology needed to deliver these services on a cost-effective basis. Our competitors may better utilize technology to change the way services in our industry are designed and delivered and they may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities than we can provide, including better contract terms, technical qualifications, price and availability of qualified professional personnel. In addition, new or disruptive technologies and methodologies by our competitors may make our services uncompetitive.

In conjunction with our initiatives to improve cost-efficiency, we incur substantial costs to develop technology, which may not ultimately serve our business purposes or lower costs. For example, advances in 2016, WD Services incurred a write-offtelehealth may reduce the number of in-process technology of $3.1 million relatedin-person visits an end-user may be required to our legal offender rehabilitation services, as it was determined the system would not meet our business needs. As of December 31, 2017, NET Services has incurred $11.9 million of developmentmake to healthcare providers in progress costs relatedorder to its LCAD NextGen technology system,receive care, which is a critical component of its initiative to progress towards an industry-leading call center and reservation scheduling platform, improve member communication, accessibility, and satisfaction, optimizecould reduce the utilization of our extensive network of transportation providers and build the foundation for additional analytical capabilities.NEMT services.


The system has not been placed into service, and a review of the project is ongoing. In addition, we made a cost-method investment of $3.0 million during 2017, in Circulation, a technology-based transportation services provider.


We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, competition from new entrants into the markets in which we operate. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share or loss of or failure to gain clients or payers,payors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our business may also be adversely affected by the consolidation of competitors, which may result in increased pricing pressure or negotiating leverage with payers,payors, or by the provision of our services by payerspayors or clients directly, including through the acquisition of competitors.

We obtain a significant portion of our business through responses to government requests for proposals and we may not be awarded contracts through this process in the future, or contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.

We obtain, and will continue to seek to obtain, a significant portion of our business from state government entities, which generally entails responding to a government request for proposal, or RFP. To propose effectively, we must accurately estimate our cost structure for servicing a proposed contract, the time required to establish operations and submit the most attractive proposal with respect to both technical and price specifications. We must also assemble and submit a large volume of information within rigid and often short timetables. Our ability to respond successfully to an RFP will greatly affect our business. If we misinterpret bid requirements as to performance criteria or do not accurately estimate performance costs in a binding bid for an RFP, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify the proposed contract and we may be required to perform under a contract that is not profitable, which could materially adversely impacted by inadequacies in,affect our results of operations.

If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or security breachesobtain new contracts and future bonds, any of which could harm our information technology systems.business and results of operations.

Our information technology systems are critically importantfailure to comply with our operationscontractual obligations could, in addition to providing grounds for immediate termination of the contract for cause, negatively impact our financial performance and we must implement anddamage our reputation, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain appropriate and sufficient infrastructure and systemscurrent contracts or obtain new contracts. The termination of a contract for cause could, for instance, subject us to support growth and business processes. We provideliabilities for excess costs incurred by a payor in obtaining similar services to individuals, including services that
30


from another source. In addition, our contracts require us to maintain sensitiveindemnify payors for our failure to meet standards of care, and personal client information, including information relatingsome of them contain liquidated damages provisions and financial penalties if we breach these contracts, which amounts could be material. For example, we have a minimum volume commitment under one of our transportation-related contracts. To the extent our actual use is less than the minimum commitment for a specified period, we may be subject to their health, social security numberssignificant expense, without the benefit of corresponding revenue. Our failure to meet contractual obligations could also result in substantial actual and other identifying data. Therefore, our information technology systems store client information protected by numerous federal, state and foreign regulations. We also rely on our information technology systems (someconsequential financial damages, the impact of which are outsourcedcould be materially adverse to our business and reputation

If we fail to estimate accurately the cost of performing certain contracts, we may experience reduced or negative margins and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

During 2020, 2019 and 2018, 86.2%, 84.6% and 79.2% of our NEMT Segment revenue, respectively, was generated under capitated contracts with the remainder generated through FFS and flat fee contracts. Under most of our capitated contracts, we assume the responsibility of managing the needs of a specific geographic population by contracting out transportation services to local transportation companies on a per ride or per mile basis. We use “pricing models” to determine applicable contract rates, which take into account factors such as estimated utilization, state specific data, previous experience in the state or with similar services, the medically covered programs outlined in the contract, identified populations to be serviced, estimated volume, estimated transportation provider rates and availability of mass transit. The amount of the fixed per-member, monthly fee is determined in the bidding process, but is predicated on actual historical transportation data for the subject geographic region as provided by the payor, actuarial work performed in-house as well as by third parties) to manageparty actuarial firms and actuarial analysis provided by the data, communications and business processes for all other functions, including our marketing, sales, logistics, customer service, accounting and administrative functions. Further, our systems include interfaces to third-party stakeholders, often connected viapayor. If the Internet. In addition, certainutilization of our services or information related to our services are carried out or hosted within our customers’ IT systems, and any failure or weaknesses in their IT systemsis more than we estimated, the contract may negatively impact our ability to deliver the services, for which webe less profitable than anticipated, or may not be profitable at all. Under our FFS contracts, we receive relief from contractual performance obligations or compensation for services provided. Asfees based on our interactions with government-sponsored clients. To earn a result ofprofit on these contracts, we must accurately estimate costs incurred in providing services. If the data we maintainclient population relating to these contracts is not large enough to cover our fixed costs, such as rent and third-party access, we are subject to increasing cybersecurity risks. The nature ofoverhead, our business, where services are often performed outside a secured location, adds additional risk.
If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, sustain and protect an appropriate technology infrastructure, our business or financialoperating results could be negatively impacted. Furthermore, computer hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operate large scale and complex automated attacksmaterially adversely affected and our information technology systemsprofitability impaired. Our FFS contracts are not reimbursed on a cost basis; therefore, if we fail to estimate our costs accurately, we may experience reduced margins or losses on these contracts. Revenue under certain contracts may be vulnerable to material security breaches (including the access to or acquisition of customer, employee or other confidential data), cyber-based attacks or other material system failures. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to implement adequate preventative measures sufficient to prevent a breach of our systems and protect sensitive data. Any breach of our data security could result in an unauthorized release or transfer of customer or employee information, or the loss of valuable business data or cause a disruption in our business. A failure to prevent, detect and respond in a timely manner to a major breach of our data security or to other cybersecurity threats could result in system disruption, business continuity issues or compromised data integrity. These events or any other failure to safeguard personal data could give rise to unwanted media attention, damage our reputation, damage our customer relationships and result in lost sales, fines or lawsuits. We may also be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against or respond to or alleviate problems caused by a security breach.adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations. If we are unable to prevent material failures,adjust our operationscosts accordingly, our profitability may be negatively affected. In addition, certain contracts with state Medicaid agencies are renewable or extended at the state’s option without an adjustment to pricing terms. If such renewed contracts require us to incur higher costs, including inflation or regulatory changes, than originally anticipated, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The NEMT Segment may be adversely impacted if the drivers we engage as independent contractors were instead classified as employees.

We believe that the drivers we engage to provide rider benefits are properly classified as independent contractors and that these drivers are not our employees. Changes to federal, state or local laws governing the definition or classification of independent contractors, or judicial or administrative challenges to our classification of these drivers as independent contractors, could affect the status of these drivers as independent contractors. A change in the classification of these drivers from independent contractors to employees could increase materially our expenses associated with the delivery of our services, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Significant interruptions in communication and data services could adversely affect our business.

Our contact centers are significantly dependent on telephone, internet and data service provided by various communication companies. Any disruption of these services could adversely affect our business. We have taken steps to mitigate our exposure to service disruptions by investing in complex and multi-layered redundancies, and we may suffer other negative consequences such as reputational damage, litigation, remediation costs,can transition services among our different call centers. Despite these efforts, there can be no assurance that the redundancies we have in place would be sufficient to maintain the call centers' operations without disruption. Any disruption could harm our customer relationships and have a requirementmaterial adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Personal Care Segment

Competition among in-home personal care, or home healthcare, services companies is intense, and if we are not to operatesuccessful executing on our strategies in the face of this competition, our business until defectscould be materially adversely affected.

The in-home personal care services industry, which is sometimes referred to as the home healthcare services industry, is highly competitive. Our Personal Care Segment competes with a variety of other companies in providing personal care services, some of which may have greater financial and other resources and may be more established in their respective communities. Competing companies may offer newer or different services from those offered by us, which may attract
31


customers who are remediedpresently receiving our in-home personal care services to those other companies. Competing companies may also offer services across a greater continuum of care and therefore may be able to obtain new cases or penalties under various data privacy lawsretain patients that might otherwise choose us. In the areas in which our in-home personal care programs are provided, we also compete with a large number of organizations, including:

community-based home healthcare providers;
hospital-based home healthcare agencies;
rehabilitation centers, including those providing home healthcare services;
adult day care centers;
assisted living centers;
skilled nursing facilities; and regulations,
fiscal intermediaries that process payroll and undertake other administrative responsibilities related to the provision of care by a patient’s family members or other directly-hired personal assistants.

Some of our current and potential competitors have or may obtain significantly greater marketing and financial resources to promote their programs than we have or may obtain. We compete based on the availability of personnel, the quality of services, the expertise of staff and, in some instances, the price of the services. Relatively few barriers to entry exist in our local markets. Accordingly, other companies, including hospitals and other healthcare organizations that are not currently providing in-home personal care services, may expand their services to include those services or similar services. We may encounter increased competition in the future that could negatively impact patient referrals to us, and limit our ability to maintain or increase our market position, the effect of any of which could detrimentally affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

If any large, national healthcare entities that do not currently directly compete with us move into the in-home personal care market, competition could significantly increase. Larger, national healthcare entities have significant financial resources and extensive technology infrastructure. In addition, companies that currently compete with respect to some of our personal care services could begin competing with additional services through the acquisition of an existing company or de novo expansion into these services. Additionally, consolidation, especially by way of the acquisition of any of our competitors by any large, national healthcare entity, could also lead to increased competition.

State certificates of need, or CON, laws, which often limit the ability of competitors to enter into a given market, are not uniform throughout the United States and are frequently the subject of efforts to limit or repeal such laws. If states remove existing CON laws, we could face increased competition in these states. Further, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with existing patient referral sources, our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Our success in entering the markets we serve depends on referrals from physicians, hospitals, nursing homes, service coordination agencies, MCOs, health plans and other sources in the communities we serve and on our ability to maintain good relationships with existing referral sources. Our referral sources are not contractually obligated to refer patients to us and may refer their patients to other providers. Our growth and profitability depends, in part, on our ability to establish and maintain close working relationships with these patient referral sources and to increase awareness and acceptance of the benefits of personal care services by our referral sources and their patients. Our loss of, or failure to maintain, existing relationships or our failure to develop new referral relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many states have CON laws or other regulatory and licensure obligations that may adversely affect the successful integration of our personal care service lines and that may adversely affect our ability to expand into new markets and thereby limit our ability to grow and increase net patient service revenue.

Many states have enacted CON laws that require prior state approval to open new healthcare facilities or expand services at existing facilities. In such states, expansion by existing providers or entry into the market by new providers is permitted only where a given amount of unmet need exists, resulting either from population increases or a reduction in competing providers. These states ration the entry of new providers or services and the expansion of existing providers or services in their markets through a CON process, which is periodically evaluated and updated as required by applicable state law. The process is intended to promote comprehensive healthcare planning, assist in providing high-quality healthcare at the lowest possible cost and avoid unnecessary duplication by ensuring that only those healthcare facilities and operations that are
32


needed will be built and opened. New York, New Jersey, and West Virginia have CON laws applicable to the in-home personal care services we provide.

In every state where required, our home healthcare offices and personal care centers possess a license and/or CON issued by the state health authority that determines the local service areas for the home healthcare office or personal care center. In general, the process for opening a home healthcare office or personal care center begins by a provider submitting an application for licensure and certification to the state and federal regulatory bodies, which is followed by a testing period of transmitting data from the applicant to the CMS. Once this process is complete, the care center receives a provider agreement and corresponding number and can begin billing for services that it provides unless a CON is required. For those states that require a CON, the provider must also complete a separate application process before billing can commence and receive required approvals for capital expenditures exceeding amounts above prescribed thresholds. Our failure or inability to obtain any necessary approvals could adversely affect our ability to expand into new markets and to expand our Personal Care Segment services and facilities in existing markets.

If a state with CON laws finds that there is an over-abundance of one type of Medicaid provider within the state, it may, for a period of time, impose a moratorium against the issuance of new Medicaid licenses for that type of service. While a moratorium would not prohibit us from continuing to provide services for which we are already licensed in that state, it may prevent us from entering a new state de novo, which could limit our expansion opportunities, affect our ability to execute on our business strategies and materially harm our business and operations.

We may not, absent the consent of the New York Department of Health, be able to manage the day to day operations of the licensed in-home personal care services agency business in the State of New York acquired in connection with the acquisition of our Personal Care Segment, which would have an adverse impact on our expected results from that acquisition and could result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Our operation of our licensed in-home personal care services agency business in the State of New York is subject to a “no control” affidavit process. We submitted our relevant information associated with this process concurrently with the closing of the Simplura acquisition, but while we wait for necessary approvals, we will be limited in our ability to exercise control over the personal care business there for operational matters until such time that our ownership of that business is approved by the New York Department of Health. We can provide no assurance regarding the timing of the approval of this change of ownership by the New York Department of Health, or that such approval will be obtained at all. During this time, we cannot exercise day to day management of these entities, and the former management of Simplura will continue to operate the business. There is no prohibition on these entities making cash distributions to us during this interim period, but there can be no assurance that we will obtain the necessary authorization from the New York Department of Health to remove the “no control” affidavit and operate this business ourselves. If we are not able to ultimately take over control of these operations, or if we are only able to do so on a more limited basis than anticipated, we may not achieve the synergies and operational benefits expected from the Simplura acquisition as contemplated and our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We may have acquired liabilities that are not known to us in connection with the acquisition of our Personal Care Segment, the inadvertent acquisition of which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations.

FailureOur Personal Care Segment may have been acquired with liabilities that we failed, or were unable, to protectdiscover in the course of performing our client’s privacydue diligence investigations associated with the transaction. We cannot assure you that the indemnification available to us under the purchase agreement associated with the acquisition will be sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully offset the possible liabilities associated with the acquisition. We may learn additional information about this business that materially adversely affects us, such as unknown or contingent liabilities and confidential informationliabilities related to compliance with applicable laws. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could lead to legal liability, adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We retain confidential informationChanges in the case-mix of our personal care patients, as well as payor mix and payment methodologies, may have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

The sources and amounts of our patient revenues are determined by a number of factors, including the mix of patients and the rates of reimbursement among payors. Changes in the case-mix of the patients as well as payor mix among private pay, Medicare and Medicaid, as well as specialty programs, including waiver programs within Medicaid, may significantly affect our profitability. In particular, any significant increase in our computer systems,Medicaid population or decrease in Medicaid payments could
33


have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flow, particularly if states operating these programs continue to limit, or more aggressively seek limits on, reimbursement rates or service levels.

Our loss of existing favorable managed care contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

There is a risk that our existing favorable managed care contracts could be terminated. Managed care contracts typically permit us or the payor to terminate the contract without cause, typically within 90 days, which can provide payors leverage to reduce volume or obtain favorable pricing. Our failure to negotiate and put in place favorable managed care contracts, or our failure to maintain in place favorable managed care contracts, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The personal care industry has historically experienced shortages in qualified employees and management, which could harm our business.

Our personal care services compete with other healthcare providers for both professional and management level employees. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel depends on several factors, including our ability to provide these personnel with attractive assignments for the desired number of hours per week and competitive compensation and benefits. We cannot be assured we will succeed in any of these areas. As the demand for personal information aboutcare services continues to exceed the supply of available and qualified personnel, our competitors may be forced to offer more attractive wage and benefit packages to these professionals. Furthermore, the competitive market for this labor force has created turnover as many seek to take advantage of the supply of available positions, each offering new and more attractive wage and benefit packages. In addition to the wage pressures inherent in this environment, including any changes to minimum wage, the cost of training new employees amid the turnover rates may cause added pressure on our operating results and harm our business.

Our personal care business may be adversely impacted by labor relations.

Approximately 1,400 of our hourly caregivers are unionized in regions of New York. Certain collective bargaining agreements with the 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East are currently being negotiated, and others will require renegotiation upon expiration. We may not be able to negotiate terms that are satisfactory to the labor unions, and ultimate agreement may be on terms unfavorable to us. In addition, a unionized work force poses the risk of work stoppages, which if initiated could materially harm our results of operations as well as our commercial relationships with our customers if we are unable to perform under our contracts with them during any such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, identification numbersstoppage.

If additional regions in which we operate become unionized, or if we expand our personal care operations into geographic areas where healthcare workers historically have been unionized, being subject to additional collective bargaining agreements may have a negative impact on our ability to timely and payment account information. Malicious cyber attackssuccessfully recruit qualified personnel and may increase our operating costs. Generally, if we are unable to gain access to personal information affect many companies across various industries, including ours. Pursuant to federalattract and state laws, various government agencies have established rules protectingretain qualified personnel, the privacy and security of personal information. In addition, most states have enacted laws, which vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information. An increasing number of states require that customers be notified if a security breach results in the inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable customer information. Any compromise of the securityquality of our systems that results in the disclosure of personally identifiable customer or employee information or inadvertent disclosure of any clients’ personal informationservices may decline and we could damage our reputation, deter people from using our services, expose us to litigation, increase regulatory scrutinylose patients and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses. In addition, data breaches impacting other companies, such as our vendors, may allow cybercriminals to obtain personally identifiable information about our customers. Cybercriminals may then use this information to, among other things, attempt to gain unauthorized access to our customers’ accounts,referral sources, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our Personal Care Segment may be subject to malpractice or financial condition.other similar claims.




FailureThe services our Personal Care Segment offers involve an inherent risk of professional liability and related substantial damage awards. Due to maintain or to develop further reliable, efficient and secure information technology systems would be disruptive to our operations and diminish our ability to compete and grow our business successfully.

We are highly dependent on efficient and uninterrupted performancethe nature of our information technologypersonal care business, we, through our employees and business systems. These systems quote, process and service our business, and perform financial functions necessary for pricing and service delivery. These systems must also be able to undergo periodic modifications and improvements without interruptions or untimely delays in service. Additionally, our ability to integrate our systems with those of our clients is critical to our success. Our information systems rely on the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources to maintain and enhance existing systems as well as develop and create new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory requirements. However, we still rely on manual processes and procedures, including accounting, reporting and consolidation processes that may result in errors and may not scale proportionately with our business growth.

A failure or delay to achieve improvements in our information technology platforms could interrupt certain processes or degrade business operations and could place us at a competitive disadvantage. If we are unable to implement appropriate systems, procedures and controls, we may not be able to successfully offer ourcaregivers who provide services and grow our business and account for transactions in an appropriate and timely manner, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial conditionbehalf, may be the subject of medical malpractice claims. A court could find these individuals should be considered our agents, and, resultsas a result, we could be held liable for their acts or omissions. Claims of operations.

There are risks associated with our international operations that are different from the risks associated with our operations in the U.S., and our exposure to the risksthis nature, regardless of a global market could hinder our ability to maintain and expand international operations.
We have operation centers in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, the UK and the U.S. and a noncontrolling interest in a joint venture in Spain. In implementing our international strategy, we may face barriers to entry and competition from local companies and other companies that already have established global businesses, as well as the risks generally associated with conducting business internationally. The success and profitability of international operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control, such as:

political or economic instability;
changes in governmental regulation or taxation;
currency exchange fluctuations;
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations in certain foreign countries, including potential pension and social plan liabilities;
work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions; and
taxes and other restrictions on repatriating foreign profits back to the U.S.
In addition, changes in policies or laws of the U.S. or foreign governments resulting in, among other changes, higher taxation, tariffs or similar protectionist laws could reduce the anticipated benefits of international operations andtheir ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies, including intercompany transactions outside the U.S., and we currently do not conduct hedging activities. The value of the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies has seen significant volatility recently. Our financial condition and results of operations are reported in multiple currencies, and are then translated into U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Appreciation of the U.S. dollar against these other currencies will have a negative impactbusiness or reputation or on our reported net revenueability to attract and operating income while depreciationretain patients and employees. While we maintain malpractice liability coverage that we believe is appropriate given the nature and breadth of the U.S. dollarour operations, any claims against such currencies will have a positive effect on reported net revenue and operating income. We cannot predict with precision the effectus in excess of future exchange-rate fluctuations on our business and operating results, and significant rate fluctuationsinsurance limits, or multiple claims requiring us to pay deductibles, could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and financial condition.cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Matrix Investment Segment

Our investment in Matrix could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our equity investment’s financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and Matrix and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of Matrix, and could materially and adversely affect the value of our consolidated assets.

34


We hold a non-controlling interest in Matrix, which, as of December 31, 2020, constituted 9.6% of our consolidated assets. We do not have unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Matrix’s economic performance. The arrangement with Matrix involves risks not present with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiaries and that may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations will continueor make the arrangement less successful than anticipated. Factors that may negatively impact the success of our Matrix investment include the following:

we may be unable to fluctuate duetake actions that we believe are appropriate but are opposed by Matrix under arrangements that require us to seasonality.cede or share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the company and any property owned by the company, such as the sale or financing of the business or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the business;
Matrix management may take actions that we oppose;
NET Services operating resultswe may be unable to sell or transfer our investment to a third party if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our investment partner;
Matrix may become bankrupt or the majority member may fail to fund its share of required capital contributions, which could adversely impact the investment or increase our financial commitment to the investment;
Matrix may have business interests or goals with respect to a business that conflict with our business interests and operating cash flows normally fluctuategoals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the business;
disagreements with Matrix could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our management, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the business, including the delay of important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
we may suffer losses as a result of seasonal variations inactions taken by Matrix with respect to our business. Due to higher demand in the summer months and lower demand in the winter months, coupled with a primarily fixed revenue stream based on a per-member, per-month payment structure, NET Services normally experiences lower operating margins during the summer season and higher operating margins during the winter season. WD Services typically does not experience seasonal fluctuations in operating results. However, volatility in revenue and earnings is common in the case of WD Services due to the timing of commencement and expiration of certain major contracts as well as fluctuations in referrals provided by its customers.investment.




Our reported financial results could suffer if there is an impairment of long-lived assets.
Goodwill may be impaired if the estimated fair value of one or more of our reporting units is less than the carrying valueIf any of the respective reporting unit. As a result of our growth, in part through acquisitions, goodwill and other intangible assets represent a significant portion of our assets. We perform an analysis on our goodwill balancesforegoing events were to test for impairment on an annual basis. Interim impairment tests may also be required in advance of our annual impairment test if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value, including goodwill, of one or more of our reporting units below the reporting unit’s carrying value. Such circumstances could include but are not limited to: (1) loss of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the climate of our business, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator or (5) a significant decline in our stock price. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recorded asset impairment charges of $19.6 million related to WD Services and an asset impairment of $1.4 million for Corporate and Other related to the sale of a building, as discussed below in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”. As of December 31, 2017, the carrying value of goodwill, intangibles and property and equipment, net is $121.7 million, $43.9 million and $50.4 million, respectively. In addition, property and equipment as of December 31, 2017 includes $13.4 million of construction and development in progress, primarily related to NET Services’ LCAD NextGen technology system, as discussed above. We continue to monitor the carrying value of these long-lived assets. Any future impairment charges could have a material adverse impact ontranspire, our results of operations and financial position.liquidity position could be materially adversely affected and our business could be materially harmed.

Our use of a reinsurance program and insurance programsRisks Related to cover certain claims for losses suffered and costs or expenses incurred could negatively impact our business.Governmental Regulations

We reinsured a substantial portion of our automobile, general liability, professional liability and workers’ compensation insurance policies through May 15, 2017. Upon renewal of the policies, we made the decision to no longer reinsure these risks, although we continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years. Through February 15, 2011, one of our subsidiaries also insured certain general liability, automobile liability, and automobile physical damage coverage for independent third-party transportation providers. In the event that actual reinsured losses increase unexpectedly and substantially exceed actuarially determined estimated reinsured losses under the program, the aggregate of such losses could materially increase our liability and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations.

In addition, under our current insurance policies, we are subject to deductibles, and thus retain exposure within these limits. In the event that actual losses within our deductible limits increase unexpectedly and substantially exceed our expected losses, the aggregate of such losses could materially increase our liability and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations.

As the availability to us of certain traditional insurance coverage diminishes or increases in cost, we will continue to evaluate the levels and types of insurance coverage we include in our reinsurance and self-insurance programs, as well as the deductible limits within our traditional insurance programs. Any increase to these reinsurance and self-insurance programs or increases in deductible limits increases our risk exposure and therefore increases the risk of a possible material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations.
Inaccurate, misleading or negative media coverage could damage our reputation and harm our ability to maintain or procure contracts.
ThereHealthcare is sometimes media coverage regarding services that we or our competitors provide or contracts that we or our competitors are a party to. Inaccurate, misleading or negative media coverage about us could harm our reputation and, accordingly, our ability to maintain our existing contracts or procure new contracts. In addition, negative media coverage could influence government officials to slow the pace of privatizing or retendering government services.


Regulatory Risks
Our U.S. Healthcare Segments conduct business in a heavily regulated healthcare industry. Complianceindustry, and compliance with existing Lawslaws is costly, and changes in Laws ornon-compliance has the potential to be even costlier considering that violations of Lawslaws may result in increased costscorrective action or sanctions that could reduce our segments’ revenue and profitability.

The U.S.United States healthcare industry is subject to extensive federal and state Lawsoversight relating to, among other things:


professional licensure;
conduct of operations;
addition of facilities, equipment and services, including certificates of need;need, or CON;
coding and billing related to our services; and
payment for services.

Both federal and state government agencies have increased coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts related to the healthcare industry. Regulations related to the healthcare industry are extremely complex and, in many instances, the industry does not have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of those laws. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as the anticipated attempts to repealinvalidate all or portions of those laws by the President and Congress,in ongoing legislation, has also introduced somea degree of regulatory uncertainty, as the industry does not know how the changes it introduced or changes to it will affect many aspects of the industry.

Medicare and Medicaid anti-fraud and abuse laws prohibit certain business practices and relationships related to items and services reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental healthcare programs, including the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce or arrange for referral of patients or recommendation for the provision of items or services covered by Medicare or Medicaid or any other federal or state healthcare program.program, often referred to as the Anti-Kickback Statute. Federal and state Lawslaws also prohibit the submission of false or fraudulent claims, including claims to obtain reimbursement under Medicare and Medicaid. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsMedicaid, under what is commonly referred to as the False Claims Act. We have implemented compliance policies to help assure theirour compliance with these regulations as they become effective; however,effective, but interpretations different from our interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations in the future could subject our practices to allegations of impropriety, or illegality, or could require such segments to make changes in their facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in which they conduct our business.
Changes in budgetary priorities of the government entities that fund the services our segments provide could result in our segments’ loss of contracts or a decrease in amounts payable to them under their contracts.
Our segments’ revenue is largely derived from contracts that are directly or indirectly paid or funded by government agencies. All of these contracts are subject to legislative appropriations and state or national budget approval. The availability of funding under NET Services’ contracts with state governments is dependent in part upon federal funding to states. Changes in Medicaid methodology may further reduce the availability of federal funds to states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments provide services. The President of the United States and Congress have proposed various changes to the Medicaid program, including considering converting the Medicaid program to a block grant format or capping the federal contribution to state Medicaid programs to a fixed amount per beneficiary. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has the ability to grant waivers to states relative to the parameters of their Medicaid programs. Such changes, individually or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on our U.S. Healthcare Segments operations.
Among the alternative Medicaid funding approaches that states have explored are provider assessments as tools for leveraging increased Medicaid federal matching funds. Provider assessment plans generate additional federal matching funds to the states for Medicaid reimbursement purposes, and implementation of a provider assessment plan requires approval by CMS in order to qualify for federal matching funds. These plans usually take the form of a bed tax or a quality assessment fee, which were historically required to be imposed uniformly across classes of providers within the state, except that such taxes only applied to Medicaid health plans.
Changes to provider assessment opportunities, the Medicaid programs in states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments operate or in the structure of the federal government’s support for those programs can impact the amount of funds available in the programs our U.S. Healthcare Segments support. Such segments cannot make any assurances that these Medicaid changes will not negatively affect the funding under their contracts. As funding under U.S. Healthcare Segments’ contracts is dependent in part upon federal funding, such funding changes could have a significant effect upon such segments’ businesses.
Currently, many of the U.S. states and overseas countries in which our segments operate are facing budgetary shortfalls or changes in budgetary priorities. While many of these states are dealing with budgetary concerns by shifting costs from institutional care to home and community based care such as we provide, there is no assurance that this trend will continue.


Likewise, in many of the overseas countries addressed by WD Services, particularly the UK, a continued focus following the global financial crisis on austerity measures to reduce national and local budget deficits could lead to further spending cuts or changes to welfare arrangements. This may make availability of funding for outsourcing of such services more difficult to obtain from relevant government departments, which may lead to more challenging terms and conditions, including pressure on prices or volumes of services provided.
In the UK, the low unemployment rate has led to a change in the government prioritizing employability services, and a consequent reduction in scale of the Work and Health Programme, the successor program to the Work Programme. While we have the ability to alter a portion of our cost structure to reflect the decreasing volume of these contracts during their term, there may be significant redundancy costs and management time additionally invested to reflect these changes, particularly if programs are discontinued.
Consequently, a significant decline in government expenditures, shift of expenditures or funding away from programs that call for the types of services that we provide, or change in government contracting or funding policies could cause payers to terminate their contracts with our segments or reduce their expenditures under those contracts, either of which could have a negative impact on our segments’ operating results. 
Our segments are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information. Failure to comply with privacy and security regulations could result in a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.
There are numerous federal and state regulations addressing patient information privacy and security concerns. In particular, the federal regulations issued under HIPAA contain provisions that:

protect individual privacy by limiting the uses and disclosures of patient information;
require the implementation of security safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of individually identifiable health information in electronic form; and
prescribe specific transaction formats and data code sets for certain electronic healthcare transactions.
Compliance with state and federal laws and regulations is costly and requires our segment management to expend substantial time and resources which could negatively impact our segments’ results of operations. Further, the HIPAA regulations and state privacy laws expose our segments to increased regulatory risk, as the penalties associated with a failure to comply or with information security breaches, even if unintentional, could have a material adverse effect on our segments’ results of operations.
Our WD Services segment has operations in many countries in Europe, and internationally, and these operations have access to significant amounts of sensitive personal information about individuals. In Europe, these operations are subject to European and national data privacy legislation which imposes significant obligations on data processors and controllers with respect to such personal information. Similar regimes exist in other WD Service jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada and South Korea. Some countries, such as Spain, France and Germany, have particularly strong privacy laws which impose even greater obligations on people handling personal information. Data protection and privacy law within the EU is changing effective May 25, 2018, from which date the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) must be complied with. Amongst other changes the GDPR brings about an increase in the potential fines for certain breaches of the GDPR, of up to the higher of 4% of an undertaking’s global turnover or €20,000,000. In addition to fining powers, data protection authorities in Europe have significant powers to require organizations that breach regulations to put in place measures to ensure that such breaches do not occur again, and require businesses to stop processing personal information until the required measures are in place. Such orders could significantly impact our business given that we are required to handle personal information as part of our service delivery model. The GDPR and other similar laws and regulations, as well as any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions, may be costly to comply with, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to remedies that may harm our business, including fines or demands or orders that we modify or cease existing business practices.

Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, which could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.
If our segments fail to comply with federal and state documentation, coding and billing rules, our segments could be subject to criminal or civil penalties, loss of licenses and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results. In billing for our segments’ services to third-party payers, our segments must follow complex documentation, coding and billing rules. These rules are based on federal and state laws, rules and regulations, various government pronouncements, and industry practice. In the U.S., failure to follow these rules could result in


potential criminal or civil liability under the federal False Claims Act, under which extensive financial penalties can be imposed or under various state statutes which prohibit the submission of false claims for services covered. Compliance failure could further result in criminal liability under various federal and state criminal or civil statutes. Our segments may be subject to audits conducted by our clients or their proxies that may result in recoupment of funds. In addition, our segments’ clients may be subject to certain audits that may result in recoupment of funds from our clients that may, in turn, implicate our segments’ services. Our segments’ businesses could be adversely affected in the event such an audit results in negative findings and recoupment from or penalties to their customers.
Our segment contracts are subject to stringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of the payment mechanism. Government entities in the U.S. may take the position that if a transport cannot be matched to a healthcare event, or is conducted inconsistently with contractual, regulatory or even policy requirements, payment for such transport may be recouped by such customer. Under European procurement legislation which has been implemented in each EU member state, any conviction for fraud can result in a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. This could significantly affect our business given that most of our customers in Europe are governmental organizations. Any such breaches or deficiencies in paperwork associated with billing may also be subject to contractual clawback regimes and penalties, which can be enforced many years after the revenue has been paid by the relevant authority.
While our segments carefully and regularly review their documentation, coding and billing practices, the rules are frequently vague and confusing and they cannot assure that governmental investigators, private insurers or private whistleblowers will not challenge their practices. Such a challenge could result in a material adverse effect on our segments’ financial position and results of operations.

Our segments’ business could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.
Our U.S. Healthcare Segments are subject to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by a federally funded healthcare program. Any of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ financial relationships with healthcare providers will be potentially implicated by this statute to the extent Medicare or Medicaid referrals are implicated. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute could result in substantial civil or criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $25,000 per violation, imprisonment of up to five years, civil penalties under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law of up to $50,000 per violation, plus three times the remuneration involved, civil penalties under the False Claims Act of up to $11,000 for each claim submitted, plus three times the amounts paid for such claims and exclusion from participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Any such penalties could have a significant negative effect on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations. Furthermore, the exclusion, if applied to such segments, could result in significant reductions in our revenues, which could materially and adversely affect such segments’ businesses, financial condition and results of their operations. In addition, many states have adopted laws similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute with similar penalties.

As an international business whose customers are largely in the public sector, the WD Services segment generally wins work through public tender processes. Various statutes, such as the UK’s Bribery Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the U.S., generally require organizations to prohibit bribery by or for the organization and demand the implementation of systems to counter bribery, including risk management, training and guidance and the maintenance of adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. These statutes also, among other things, prohibit us from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. In addition, many countries in which we operate have antitrust or competition regulations which, among other things, prohibit collusive tendering or bid-rigging behavior. Policies and procedures we implement to prevent bribery, corruption and anti-competitive conduct may not effectively prevent us from violating these regulations in every transaction in which we may engage, and such a violation could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. Any breach of bribery, corruption and collusive tendering laws could also expose our operations in Europe to a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to 5 years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority.

In WD Services, we conduct business in several countries, each with its own system of regulation. Compliance with existing regulations is costly, and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce our revenue and profitability.
As of December 31, 2017, our WD Services segment operated in the U.S and 10 countries outside the U.S. Each of these countries has its own national and municipal laws and regulations, and some countries such as Australia, Germany and Switzerland,


have both federal and state regulations. In the UK, certain law making powers are being devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These laws can differ significantly from country to country. In addition, in Europe, countries (including the UK) are subject to European Union (“EU”) laws and rules. We have implemented compliance policies to help assure our compliance with these laws and regulations as they become effective; however, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations in the future could subject our practices to allegations of impropriety or illegalityoverpayment, or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in which we conduct our business.
Our segments’ businesses could be adversely affected by future legislative changes that hinder or reverse the privatizationbusiness, any of non-emergency transportation services or workforce development services.
The market for certain of our segments’ services depends largely on government sponsored programs. These programs can be modified or amended at any time. Moreover, part of our growth strategy includes aggressively pursuing opportunities created by government initiatives to privatize the delivery of non-emergency transportation services and workforce development services. However, there are opponents to the privatization of these services and, as a result, future privatization is uncertain. In the UK, opposition to the government’s outsourcing of the services provided by WD Services to private companies may increase in light of recent events in the UK, including the liquidation of the UK government contractor Carillion plc. In 2017, legislation was proposed in the U.S. Congress, but not passed, which would reduce or eliminate certain non-emergency medical transportation services provided by NET Services as a required Medicaid benefit. If additional privatization initiatives are not proposed or enacted, or if previously enacted privatization initiatives are challenged, repealed or invalidated, there could be a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.

Our business could be adversely affected by the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union.
On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which eligible persons voted in favor of a proposal that the UK leave the EU, also known as “Brexit”. The result of the referendum increases political and economic uncertainty in the UK for the foreseeable future, in particular during any period where the terms of any UK exit from the EU are negotiated. In turn, Brexit could cause disruptions to and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future payers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results, operations and prospects, including being adversely affected in ways that cannot be anticipated at present. The impact of Brexit on our business is not yet clear, and will depend on any agreements the UK makes to retain access to EU markets. Such agreements could potentially disrupt and/or destabilize the markets we serve and the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and adversely change tax benefits or liabilities in these or other jurisdictions. The terms of any UK exit from the EU could generate restriction on the movement of capital and the mobility of personnel. Depending on the outcome of negotiations between the UK and the European Union regarding the terms of Brexit (which will be negotiated over a period which may extend at least until March 2019), we may decide to alter the group’s European operations to respond to new business, legal, regulatory, tax and trade environments that may result. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which EU laws to replace, modify or replicate.
Following the referendum, there was significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. The strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and other currencies may adversely affect our results of operations as we translate sales and other results denominated in foreign currency into U.S. dollars for our financial statements. During periods of a strengthening dollar, our reported international sales and earnings could be reduced because foreign currencies may translate into fewer U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2017, revenue denominated in British pound represented 11.6% of our revenue.
Brexit may also create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our payers to closely monitor theirincrease costs and reduce their spending budget on our services. Additionally, changes in governmental personnel may impact our current relationships with our payers. Any of these effects and the uncertainties of Brexit, among others, could materially adversely affect our business business opportunities,and results of operations, financial condition, future growth and cash flows.operations.

35


Changes to the regulatory landscape applicable to Matrixour businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our Personal Care Segment locations that maintain a Medicare certified home healthcare line of business (for example, in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts) must comply with ever changing federal conditions or participation, where compliance is difficult to achieve and hard to monitor. Recently implemented requirements for which adherence is particularly challenging include the need to:

Provide transfer summary to facility within two days of a planned transfer or within two business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer if the patient is still receiving care in the facility;
Provide written notice of patient’s rights and responsibilities, and transfer and discharge policies to a patient‑selected representative within four business days of the initial evaluation visit;
Communicate revisions to the plan of care due to change in health status to the patient, representative (if any), caregiver and physicians issuing orders for plan of care; and
Communicate discharge plan revisions to the patient, representative (if any), caregiver, all physicians issuing orders for the plan of care and to the provider expected to care for the patient after discharge (if any).

CMS could adopt new requirements or guidelines that may further increase the costs associated with the provision of certified services, which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

In New York, we provide Service Coordination, or SC, and/or Home and Community Support Services, or HCSS, to 731 Traumatic Brain Injury, or TBI, and Nursing Home Transition and Diversion, or NHTD, Medicaid waiver participants. These waiver programs were developed based on the philosophy that individuals with disabilities, individuals with traumatic brain injury, and seniors, may be successfully served and included in their surrounding communities so long as the individual is the primary decision maker and works in cooperation with care providers to develop a plan of services that promotes personal independence, greater community inclusion, self-reliance and participation in meaningful activities and services. Examples of activities that are at various stages of implementation that may implicate or materially adversely affect our waiver line of business profitability follow.

Conflict Free Case ManagementThe NYS DOH, in collaboration with CMS, is implementing mandatory conflict-free case management policies. Conflict-free case management requires the separation of clinical eligibility determinations and care planning assessments (for example, SC) from the direct provision of services (for example, HCSS). Providers in the personal care industry are expected to implement additional conflict of interest standards that may or may not ultimately require the creation of legally separate entities with distinct protocols.

Managed Long-Term Care Carve-In – Managed Long-Term Care, or MLTC, is a system believed to streamline the delivery of long-term care services to people who are chronically ill or disabled and who wish to reside, or continue to reside, safely in their homes and communities. The entire array of services to which an enrolled member is entitled can be received through the MLTC plan a particular member has chosen. As New York transforms its long-term care system to one that ensures care management for all, enrollment in a MLTC plan may be mandatory or voluntary, depending on individual circumstances. While TBI and NHTD participants are currently excluded from having to enroll in a MLTC plan (for example, SC and HCSS claims are billed and paid on a Medicaid fee-for-service basis), the NYS DOH submitted a transition plan to CMS for consideration that eliminates the exclusion, meaning that TBI and NHTD waiver participants who wish to continue receiving services must enroll in a plan. While the primary goal stated was to improve access to all services across the state, the result may also require our navigation of network participation requirements and typical managed care cost control measures (for example, authorizations, utilization review, rate negotiation).

Regarding in-home personal care generally (including certified or non-certified and waiver or non-waiver), compliance with responsibilities under the Fair Labor Standards Act, or FLSA, remains key. The United States Department of Labor, or DOL, continues its focus on the industry to ensure that personal care workers earn a minimum wage and are afforded various overtime pay protections. We may be sued individually or by a class of workers claiming that a violation has occurred, or a complaint may be filed with the DOL to investigate. If it is ultimately found that we neglected to pay the full amount of wages owed under the FLSA (for meals, breaks, travel, or otherwise), payment for the missing amount and possibly double that amount may be mandated, which could materially increase our costs and harm our results of operations.

With respect to our Matrix Investment Segment, the CHA services industry is primarily regulated by federal and state healthcare Lawslaws and the requirements of participation and reimbursement of the MA Programprogram established by CMS. From time to time, CMS considers changes to regulatory guidelines with respect to prospective CHAs or the risk adjusted payment system
36


applicable to Matrix’s Medicare AdvantageMA plan customers. CMS could adopt new requirements or guidelines that may, for example, increase the costs associated with CHAs, limit the opportunities and settings available to administer CHAs, or otherwise change the risk adjusted payment system in a way that would


adversely impact our business. Further, changes in or adoption of new state laws governing the scope of practice of mid-level practitioners, or more restrictive interpretations of such laws, may restrict Matrix’s ability to provide services using nurse practitioners. Any such implementation of additional regulations on the CHA industry by CMS or other regulatory bodies or further regulation of mid-level practitioners could have a material adverse impact on Matrix’s revenues and margins, which could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated resultsbalance sheet and financial position.

The cost of operations.

If our U.S. Healthcare Segments fail to comply with physician self-referral laws, toservices is funded substantially by government and private insurance programs, and changes in budgetary priorities of the extent applicable to our operations, theygovernment entities or private insurance programs that fund these services could experience a significantresult in the loss of contracts, a reduction in reimbursement revenue.rates, or a decrease in amounts payable to us under our contracts.

Our U.S. Healthcare Segments may bePayments for our services are largely derived from contracts that are directly or indirectly paid by government agencies with public funds and private insurance companies. All of these contracts are subject to federallegislative appropriations and state statutesand/or national budget approval, as well as changes to potential eligibility for services. The availability of funding under our contracts with state governments is dependent in part upon federal funding to states. Changes in Medicaid provider reimbursement and federal matching funds methodologies may further reduce the availability of federal funds to states in which we provide services.

Currently, many of the states in which we operate are facing budgetary shortfalls or changes in budgetary priorities. While many of these states are dealing with budgetary concerns by shifting costs from institutional care to home and community-based care such as we provide, there is no assurance that this trend will continue or be implemented as it has been historically. For example, in New York (one of several states where our Personal Care Segment provides services under the name “All Metro Health Care”), there are Medicaid Redesign Team initiatives taking place aimed at reducing Medicaid expense through provider consolidation and other measures. Our continued ability to provide core services, though expected, is now dependent upon various competitive bid processes, including the following:

CDPAP Request for Offers (Pending Award) – The Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, or CDPAP, is a Medicaid program that operates pursuant to section 365-f of the New York State Social Services Law, or SSL, and implementing regulations banning paymentsin section 505.28 of title 18 of the NY Codes Rules and Regulations, or NYCRR. CDPAP is designed and intended to permit eligible chronically ill and/or physically disabled individuals (referred to as consumers) that are eligible to receive home care services greater flexibility and freedom of choice in obtaining those services by self-directing their care. Under CDPAP, consumers may receive assistance with personal care services (authorized under SSL § 365-f), home health aide services, and skilled nursing tasks (authorized under Article 36 of the Public Health Law) performed by a consumer directed personal assistant, or PA, under the instruction, supervision, and direction of the consumer or the consumer’s designated representative. The role of the Fiscal Intermediary, or FI, as set forth in SSL § 365-f, is to assist the consumer in carrying out his or her responsibilities by performing administrative services required in statute and regulation (SSL § 365-f(4‑a)(a)(ii) and 18 NYCRR § 505.28 (i), respectively) including wage and benefit processing, processing all income tax and other required wage withholdings, and maintaining various types of records. Our Personal Care Segment currently serves as FI for referrals1,156 consumers. Following a transition period to be determined by the New York State Department Health, or NYS DOH, only those entities that have successfully entered into a contract under the terms of patients and referrals by physiciansthis request for offer may continue to healthcare providersprovide FI services either directly or through contract with whom the physicians have a financial relationship and billingMedicaid MCO.

LHCSA Request for Proposal (Anticipated) – The recently enacted FY 2021 New York State Budget created a new Public Health Law, or PHL, Section 3605-c which, if implemented, would prohibit Licensed Home Care Service Agencies, or LHCSAs, such as our Personal Care Segment’s 12 individually-licensed branches, from providing or claiming for services provided pursuant to Medicaid recipients without being authorized to do so by contract with the NYS DOH. This restriction would apply to the provision of such referrals if any occur. Violationservices under the state Medicaid plan, a plan waiver, or through an MCO (for example, managed long-term care plan). If implemented, the statute would require the NYS DOH to contract with only enough LHCSAs to ensure that Medicaid recipients have access to care. The NYS DOH is expected to post an RFP that includes demonstrated cultural and language competencies specific to the population of theserecipients and the available workforce, experience serving individuals with disabilities, and demonstrated compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations among the selection criteria. After contracts are awarded, the NYS DOH could terminate a LHCSA’s contract, or suspend or limit a LHCSA’s rights and privileges under a contract, upon thirty-days' written notice if the Commissioner of Health finds that a LHCSA has failed to comply with the extent applicableprovisions of Section 3605-c or any regulations promulgated under the statute. Also, authorization received by LHCSAs under PHL Section 3605-c would not substitute for satisfying existing licensure requirements or the screening and enrollment process required for participation in the Medicaid program.
37



Consequently, a significant decline in government or private insurance company expenditures or the number of program beneficiaries, a shift of expenditures or funding away from programs that call for the types of services that we provide, or change in government contracting or funding policies could cause payors to terminate their contracts with us or reduce their expenditures or reimbursement rates under those contracts, either of which could have a negative impact on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations, may result in prohibitionfinancial position and operating results.

We are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of payment for services rendered, loss of licenses, fines, criminal penaltiespatient and exclusion from Medicaidservice user information, and Medicare programs. To the extent such segments do maintain such financial relationships with physicians, they rely on certain exceptions to self-referral laws that they believe will be applicable to such arrangements. Anyour failure to comply with such exceptionsregulations could result in a material adverse impact on our operating results.

There are numerous federal and state regulations addressing patient information privacy and security concerns. In particular, the federal regulations issued under HIPAA contain provisions that:

protect individual privacy by limiting the uses and disclosures of patient information;
require the implementation of security safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of individually identifiable health information in electronic form; and
prescribe specific transaction formats and data code sets for certain electronic healthcare transactions.

We invest considerable time and resources in ensuring compliance with state and federal privacy laws and regulations, incurring substantial costs as a result. These costs and investments could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations. Further, the HIPAA regulations and state privacy laws expose us to increased regulatory risk, as the penalties discussed above.associated with a failure to comply or with information security breaches, even if unintentional, could be substantial and have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

AsWe could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits for non-compliance with government coding and billing rules, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

If we fail to comply with federal and state documentation, coding and billing rules, we could be subject to criminal or civil penalties, loss of licenses and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and operating results. In billing for our services to third-party clients, we must follow complex documentation, coding and billing rules. These rules are based on federal and state laws, rules and regulations, various government pronouncements, including guidance and notices, and industry practice. Failure to follow these rules could result in potential criminal or civil liability under the federal False Claims Act, under which extensive financial penalties can be imposed, or under various state statutes which prohibit the submission of false claims for services covered. Compliance failure could further result in criminal liability under various federal and state criminal or civil statutes. We may be subject to audits conducted by our clients or their proxies, including the Office of Inspector General, or OIG, for the Department of Health and Human Services, or DHHS, state Medicaid regulatory agencies, state Medicaid fraud enforcement agencies, health departments, CMS, the Unified Program Integrity Contractors and regional federal program integrity contractors for the Medicare and Medicaid programs that may result in recoupment of funds. In addition, our segmentsclients may be subject to certain audits that may result in recoupment of funds from our clients that may, in turn, implicate us. We could be adversely affected in the event such an audit results in negative findings and recoupment from or penalties to our customers.

Our contracts are subject to an increased riskstringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of litigationthe payment mechanism. Government entities may take the position that if a transport cannot be matched to a medically necessary healthcare event, or is conducted inconsistently with contractual, regulatory or even policy requirements, payment for such transport may be recouped by such customer. Likewise, a government surveyor may determine that a personal care visit was not sufficiently supported by a time and attendance record and/or that the aide was not qualified on a particular date of service and seek a refund as a result.

While we carefully and regularly review documentation, and coding and billing practices, the rules are frequently vague and confusing and they cannot ensure that governmental investigators, private insurers or private whistleblowers will not challenge our practices. Such a challenge could result in a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

We could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other legal actions and liabilities.regulations governing business with public organizations.

As government contractors, our segmentsWe are subject to an increased riskthe federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of investigation,any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering,
38


purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by a federally funded healthcare program. Any of our financial relationships with healthcare providers will be potentially implicated by this statute to the extent Medicare or Medicaid referrals are implicated. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute could result in substantial civil or criminal prosecution, civil fraud, whistleblower lawsuits and other legal actions and liabilities that are not as frequently experienced by companies that do not provide government sponsored services. Companies providing government sponsored services can also become involved in public inquiries which can lead to negative media speculation or potential cancellation or terminationpenalties, including criminal fines of contracts. In WD Services in Europe, European procurement regulations in force in each European Union member state require public procurement authorities to impose a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction$100,000 per violation, imprisonment of the procuring authority, where companies are found guilty of fraud or certain other criminal offenses. Authorities can also exercise their discretion to blacklist companies for up to twoten years, where they believe theycivil penalties under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law of up to $100,000 per violation, plus three times the remuneration involved, civil penalties under the False Claims Act of up to $22,363 for each claim submitted, plus three times the amounts paid for such claims and exclusion from participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Any such penalties could have been involved in acts of gross misconduct or untila significant negative effect on our operations. Furthermore, the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. The occurrence of any of these actions, regardless of the outcome,exclusion could disrupt our operations and result in increased costs,significant reductions in our revenues, which could materially and could limitadversely affect our ability to obtain additional contracts in other jurisdictions. Further, government tenders in the U.S., the European Unionbusiness, financial position and other countries can be subject to challenge where the procurer has not followed the correct processes, or where they seek to make material amendments to contracts after award. Consequently, it can be very difficult to convince government customers to amend their contracts, even where circumstances have changed significantly, because they are concerned that if challenged they may have to re-procure the entire service. This can pose significant risks in termsresults of cost management and profitability. operations.

Our segments’ businesses arebusiness is subject to licensing regulations and other regulatory provisions, including provisions governing surveys and audits. Changesaudits, and changes to, or violations of, these regulations could negatively impact our segments’ revenues.us.

In many of the locations where our segmentswe operate, theywe are required by local laws (both U.S. and foreign) to obtain and maintain licenses. The applicable state and local licensing requirements govern the services our segmentswe provide, the credentials of staff, record keeping, treatment planning, client monitoring and supervision of staff. The failure to maintain these licenses or the loss of a license could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ businessesus and could prevent themus from providing services to clients in a given jurisdiction. Our segments’ contracts are subject to surveys or audit by their payersour payors or their clients. Our segmentsWe are also subject to regulations that restrict theirour ability to contract directly with a government agency in certain situations. Such restrictions could affect our segments’ ability to contract with certain payerspayors and clients, and could have a material adverse impact on our segments’financial condition and results of operations.



Our segments’ contracts are subject to audit and modification by the payerspayors with whom our segmentswe contract, at their sole discretion.discretion, and any such audits and modifications could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our segments’ businesses depend on theirour ability to perform successfully perform under various government funded contracts. Under the terms of these contracts, payers,payors, government agencies or their proxy contractors can review our segments’ compliance or performance, as well as our segments’ records and general business practices, at any time, and may in their discretion:


suspend or prevent our segmentsus from receiving new contracts or extending existing contracts because of violations or suspected violations of procurement laws or regulations;
terminate or modify our segments’ existing contracts;
seek to recoup the amount we were paid and/or reduce the amount our segmentswe are paid under our existing contracts; or
audit and object to our segments’ contract related fees.

Any increase in the number or scope of audits could increase our segments’ expenses, and the audit process may disrupt the day-to-day operations of our segments’ businessesbusiness and distract their management. If payerspayors have significant audit findings, or if they make material modifications to our segments’ contracts, it could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ results of operations.

Contract profitability may decline due to actions by governmental agencies or penalties that are based on government generated statistical information that may not be known to us in advance.
WD Services’ operating costs and profitability may be significantly impacted by actions required by a government agency, such as the availability of information systems maintained by the government to streamline enrollment into our service programs. Government generated performance statistics, such as the MOJ reoffending report, may not be known to us prior to its release by the government agencies. WD Services may be subject to penalties that are based on such government generated statistics, and we could be required to make material payments, the amounts of which we may not be able to estimate and which could have an adverse effect on our financial conditionposition and results of operations.

In addition, certain contracts may require that we hire former government employees, in relation to offering our service programs, or develop new information technology systems which would serve to replace legacy systems operated by the government. Lastly, revenue under certain contracts may be adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations or client profiles change materially, which may also lead to cost or productivity changes. If the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, profitability is negatively impacted.
Our estimated income taxes could be materially different from income taxes that we ultimately pay.
We are subject to income taxation in both the U.S. and 10 foreign countries, including specific states or provinces where we operate. Our overall effective income tax rate is a function of applicable local tax rates and the geographic mix of our income from continuing operations before taxes, which is itself impacted by currency movements. Consequently, the isolated or combined effects of unfavorable movements in tax rates, geographic mix, or foreign exchange rates could reduce our after-tax income.

Our annual tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment and estimation is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions and related matters. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determinations are uncertain or otherwise subject to interpretation. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related disputes could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. In addition, we make judgments regarding the applicability of tax treaties and the appropriate application of transfer pricing regulations. In the event one taxing jurisdiction disagrees with another taxing jurisdiction with respect to the amount or applicability of a particular type of tax, or the amount or availability of a particular type of tax refund or credit, we could experience temporary or permanent double taxation and increased professional fees to resolve such taxation matters. Our determination of our income tax liability is always subject to review by applicable tax authorities, and we have been audited by various jurisdictions in prior years. Although we believe our income tax estimates and related determinations are reasonable and appropriate, relevant taxing authorities may disagree. The ultimate outcome of any such audits and reviews could be materially different from the estimates and determinations reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of our operations.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform Act”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, significantly affected U.S. income tax law by changing how the U.S. imposes income tax on multinational corporations. We have recorded in our consolidated financial statements provisional amounts based on our current estimates of the effects of the Tax Reform Act in


accordance with our current understanding of the Tax Reform Act and currently available guidance. For additional information regarding the Tax Reform Act and the provisional tax amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies”. The final amounts may be significantly affected by regulations and interpretive guidance expected to be issued by the tax authorities, clarifications of the accounting treatment of various items, our additional analysis, and our refinement of our estimates of the effects of the Tax Reform Act and, therefore, such final amounts may be materially different than our current provisional amounts, which could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

Restrictive covenantsOur existing debt agreements contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our agreements covering our outstanding indebtedness, including the Credit Agreement mayand the indenture governing our Notes, contain various covenants that limit our current and future operations, particularlyor will limit our ability to respond to changesengage in our business or to pursue our business strategies.
The terms contained in thespecified types of transactions. These agreements that govern certain of our indebtedness, including our Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (as amended, supplemented, or modified, the “Credit Agreement”), and the agreements that govern any future indebtedness of ours, may, include a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that we believe may be in our best interest. These agreements, among other things, limit our ability to:


incur additional debt;
provide guarantees in respect of obligations of other persons;
issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;
pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
make loans, investments and capital expenditures;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
create or incur liens;
make distributions from our subsidiaries;
permit contractual obligations that burden our ability to make distributions from our subsidiaries;
sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries;
make acquisitions; and
consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person.
39



A breach of theany of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under the applicable agreements that govern our indebtedness. Suchindebtedness, including as a result of cross default may preclude us from drawing from our senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or allow the creditors to accelerate the related debtprovisions, and, may result in the accelerationcase of anyour Credit Facility, permit the lenders to cease making loans to us. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our Credit Facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. Such actions by those lenders could cause cross defaults under our other debt that we may incur to which a cross acceleration or cross-default provision applies.indebtedness. In the event of acceleration of our lenders accelerateoutstanding indebtedness, we cannot assure you that we would be able to repay the repaymentdebt or obtain new financing to refinance the debt. Even if new financing is made available to us, it may not be on terms acceptable to us. If we were unable to repay these amounts, certain debt holders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the indebtedness, including the equity of subsidiary guarantors that we have pledged as collateral, pursuant to our Credit Agreement. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and the value of our equity could be materially diminished.

We have substantial indebtedness and lease obligations that could affect our ability to meet our obligations under our indebtedness and lease obligations and may otherwise restrict our activities and harm our operations and business.

Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate indebtedness, and prevent us from meeting our obligations under the Credit Facility. Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could have important consequences, including:

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments;
requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and lease payments under our leases, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, weincluding borrowings under the Credit Facility, are at variable rates of interest;
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness, including the Credit Facility and the Notes;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;
imposing restrictions on the operation of our business that may hinder our ability to take advantage of strategic opportunities or to grow our business;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures (including real estate acquisitions), debt service requirements and general corporate or other purposes, which could be exacerbated by volatility in the credit markets; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our competitors who are less leveraged and who therefore may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on and to refinance our indebtedness depends on and is subject to our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors, all of which are beyond our control, including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We cannot assure you that weour business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our debt, to refinance our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. Any refinancing or restructuring of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants that could further restrict our subsidiaries would have sufficient assetsbusiness operations. Further, in the event of a default, the holders of our indebtedness could elect to repaydeclare such indebtedness.indebtedness be due and payable, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

LossExpiration of existing Credit Agreement, loss of available financing or an inability to renew, repay or refinance our debt could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


At December 31, 2017,The indebtedness subject to our available creditCredit Agreement matures in August 2023 and there can be no assurance that we will be able to extend our indebtedness under theour Credit Facility was $188.9 million. The Credit Facility maturesAgreement or enter into a new one on August 2, 2018.terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If our cash on hand is insufficient, or we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows in the future to cover our cash flow and liquidity needs and service our debt, we may be required to seek additional sources of funds, including extending or replacing our indebtedness under our Credit Agreement, refinancing all or a portion of our existing or future debt,indebtedness, incurring
40


additional debtindebtedness to maintain sufficient cash flow to fund our ongoing operating needs pay interest and fund anticipated expenditures. There can be no assurance that any new financing or refinancing will be possible or that any additional financing could be obtained on terms acceptable terms.to us, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additionalneeded financing, we may (i) be unable to satisfy our ongoing obligations, under our outstanding indebtedness, (ii) be unable to pursue future business opportunities or fund acquisitions, (iii) find it more difficult to fund future operating costs, tax payments or general corporate expenditures, and (iv) become vulnerable to adverse general economic, capital markets and industry conditions. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.




We may incur substantial additional indebtedness, in the future, which could impair our financial condition.

We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund our activities, including but not limited to fund share repurchases, acquisitions, cash dividends and business expansion. While our Credit Agreement contains restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of significant qualifications and exceptions, and under certain circumstances, the amount of indebtedness that could be incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Any existing and futureadditional indebtedness increaseswould increase the risk that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay amounts due in respect of such indebtedness.indebtedness, and the risks that we already face as a result of our leverage would intensify. Future substantial indebtedness could also have other important consequences on our business. For example, it could:


make it more difficult for us to satisfy our existing obligations;
make it more difficult to renew or enter into new contracts with existing and potential future clients;
limit our ability to borrow additional amounts to fund, among other things, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, the execution of our business strategy or acquisitions and other purposes;acquisitions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on our debt, which would reduce the funds available to us for other purposes;
restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions;
restrict our ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due;
make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions, as well as in government regulation and to our business; and
expose us to risks inherent in interest rate fluctuations because some of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest, which could result in higher interest expensesexpense in the event of increases in interest rates; andrates.
make it more difficult to satisfy our financial obligations.

Our ability to satisfy and manage our debt obligations depends on our ability to generate cash flow and on overall financial market conditions. To some extent, this is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to permit us to pay principal, premium, if any, or interest on our debt obligations. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt obligations and meet our other cash needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell or curtail assets or operations, seek additional capital, or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. If we must sell or curtail our assets or operations, it may negatively affect our ability to generate revenue.

Risks Related to Our CapitalCommon Stock

Future sales of shares of our common stock by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. As of December 31, 2020, we had 19.6 million shares of common stock outstanding that were freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless held by or purchased by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Shares of our common stock held by or purchased by our affiliates are restricted or “covered” securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but will be eligible for resale subject to applicable volume, means of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

With respect to our stockholders Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC - Series A, which we sometimes refer to collectively as the Coliseum Stockholders, any or all of which may continue to be considered an affiliate or affiliates of ours, we have filed a registration statement that has been declared effective under the Securities Act covering the resale by the Coliseum Stockholders of an aggregate of 1,542,055 shares of our common stock that continue to be held by the Coliseum Stockholders. As a result, such shares may be sold pursuant to the registration statement without regard to the volume and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act that would otherwise be applicable to such sales.

41


We also filed a registration statement under the Securities Act to register additional shares of common stock to be issued under our Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or Incentive Plan, and, as a result, all shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of stock options or vesting of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units granted under our Incentive Plan will also be freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless purchased or acquired by our affiliates under the plan. As of December 31, 2020, there were vested stock options outstanding and exercisable to purchase a total of 54,546 shares of our common stock and there were 93,227 shares of our common stock subject to restricted stock awards under the plan. In addition, 1,250,381 shares of our common stock are reserved for future issuances under the Incentive Plan.

Our annual operating results and stock price may be volatile or may decline significantly regardless of our operating performance.

Our annual operating results and the market price for our Common Stockcommon stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which we cannot control, including:


changes in rates or coverage for services by payers;payors;
changes in Medicaid, Medicare or other U.S.United States federal or state rules, regulations policies or applicable foreign regulations, policies and technical guidance, including UK health, employment and criminal justice legislation and guidance, Saudi Arabian licensing and Saudization rules, as well as other foreign laws applicable to our business;policies;
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market;
market conditions or trends in our industry or the economy as a whole;whole, including increases in the minimum wage requirements in various jurisdictions in which we operate, and fluctuations in the size of the Medicare member population as well as overall health of its members;
increased competition, in any of our segments, including through insourcing of services by our clients and new entrants to the market;
other events or factors, including those resultingnegative effects from war, incidents of terrorism, natural disasters, pandemics, or responses to these events;
changes in tax law;laws; and
changes in accounting principles.

If any of these events or circumstances were to impact our results or stock price, our common stock price could decrease and the value of an investment in our common stock would experience a corresponding decrease.

In addition, the stock markets, and in particular the NASDAQ, Global Select Market, have experienced considerable price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs, and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.



The Company depends on its subsidiaries for cash to fund all of its operations and expenses, including to make future dividend payments or to fund stock repurchases, if any.any, and there can be no assurance that our subsidiaries will make available to us the funds necessary for us to fund our operations and capital needs.

Our operations are conducted entirely through our subsidiaries and oursubsidiaries. Our ability to generate cash to fund all of our operations and expenses, to pay dividends or complete stock repurchase programs, or to meet any debt service obligations is highly dependent on theour subsidiaries’ earnings and the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries viaby way of dividends or intercompany loans. We dohave not currently expect to declare or paypaid any cash dividends on our Common Stock forcommon stock and do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future; however,future. We currently intend to invest our and our subsidiaries’ future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, to develop our business, invest in our technology, for working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. To the extent that we determine in the future to pay dividends on our Common Stock,common stock, however, none of our subsidiaries will be obligated to make funds available to us for the payment of dividends. Similarly, our subsidiaries are not obligated to make funds available to us to fund stock repurchases. Further, the agreement governing our Credit Agreement significantly restricts the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or otherwise transfer assets to us. In addition, Delaware law may impose requirements that may restrictimposes solvency restrictions on our ability to pay dividends to holders of our Common Stock.common stock. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares. Furthermore, if the subsidiaries are unable or unwilling to fund our cash needs when needed or desired, our results of operations and business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Common Stock will dependcommon stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more analysts downgrade our stock or publish misleading or unfavorable
42


research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which could cause our common stock price or trading volume to decline.
Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline. As of March 5, 2018, we had 12,866,551 outstanding shares of Common Stock which are freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), unless held by or purchased by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Shares of our Common Stock held by or purchased by our affiliates are restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but will be eligible for resale subject to applicable volume, means of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
As of March 5, 2018, shares of our convertible preferred stock were convertible into 2,014,042 shares of Common Stock, all of which are subject to registration rights. In addition, as of March 5, 2018, 1,653,755 shares of Common Stock are beneficially owned by entities for which Coliseum Capital Management acts as investment adviser.
In August 2016, we filed a registration statement under the Securities Act to register additional shares of Common Stock to be issued under our equity compensation plans and, as a result, all shares of Common Stock acquired upon exercise of stock options granted under our plans will also be freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless purchased by our affiliates. As of December 31, 2017, there were stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 606,695 shares of our Common Stock and there were 111,157 shares of our Common Stock subject to restricted stock awards. In addition, 1,938,666 shares of our Common Stock are reserved for future issuances under the plan.

The terms of our Preferred Stock contain restrictive covenants that may impair our ability to conduct business and we may not be able to maintain compliance with the obligations under our outstanding Preferred Stock which could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.

On February 11, 2015 and March 12, 2015, we issued $65.5 million and $15.8 million, respectively, of Preferred Stock. The terms of the Preferred Stock require us to pay mandatory quarterly dividends, either in cash or through an increase in the stated principal value of such stock. Our ability to satisfy and manage our obligations under our outstanding Preferred Stock depends, in part, on our ability to generate cash flow and on overall financial market conditions. Additionally, the terms of our Preferred Stock contain operating and financial covenants that limit management’s discretion with respect to certain business matters. Among other things, these covenants, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, restrict our ability to incur additional debt, sell or otherwise dispose of our assets, make acquisitions, and merge or consolidate with other entities. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we may be limited in how we conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.


Future offerings of debt or equity securities that would rank senior to our Common Stock, may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
If, in the future, we decide to issue debt or equity securities that rank senior to our Common Stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our Common Stock and may result in dilution to owners of our Common Stock. We and, indirectly, our stockholders, will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our Common Stock will bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our Common Stock and diluting the value of their stock holdings in us.
Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including with respect to the requirements of and related rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is expensive and time-consuming, and any delays or difficulties in satisfying these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.
We are subject to the reporting and corporate governance requirements, under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), that apply to issuers of listed equity, which impose certain significant compliance costs and obligations upon us. Being a publicly listed company requires a significant commitment of additional resources and management oversight resulting in increased operating costs. These requirements also place additional demands on our finance and accounting staff and on our financial accounting and information systems. Other expenses associated with being a public company include increases in auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors’ fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees, as well as other expenses. As a public company, we are required, among other things, to define and expand the roles and the duties of our Board of Directors (“Board”) and its committees and institute more comprehensive compliance and investor relations functions.

If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting may be adversely affected. Preparing our consolidated financial statements involves a number of complex manual and automated processes, which are dependent upon individual data input or review and require significant management judgment. One or more of these elements may result in errors that may not be detected and could result in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements. If a material misstatement occurs in the future, we may fail to meet our future reporting obligations. For example, we may fail to file periodic reports in a timely manner or may need to restate our financial results, either of which may cause the price of our common stock to decline. In addition, our WD Services business is subject to the European Union’s and other countries’ data security and protection laws and regulations, which may make it more difficult for the Company to maintain the records and internal accounting practices necessary to ensure the appropriate operation of our internal controls or to detect corruption or increasing the Company’s costs to maintain appropriate controls.

If the accounting estimates we make, and the assumptions on which we rely, in preparing our financial statements prove inaccurate, our actual results may be adversely affected.

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments about, among other things, taxes, revenue recognition, contingent obligations, NET Services transportation expense, recoverability of long-lived assets and doubtful accounts. In addition, our foreign operations report their results pursuant to International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, or local accounting standards, which requires judgment to convert into GAAP. Lastly, the implementation of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, requires a significant level of judgment and estimation, especially in regards to contingent or success-based payments, such as those prevalent at WD Services. These estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, the amounts of charges accrued by us, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and at the time they are made. If our estimates or the assumptions underlying them are not correct, we may need to accrue additional charges or reduce the value of assets that could adversely affect our results of operations, leading to a loss in investor confidence in our ability to manage our business and our stock price could decline.



Anti-takeover provisions in our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-lawsbylaws could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company and may affect the trading price of our Common Stock.common stock.

Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include a number of provisions that may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which includeincluding provisions governing when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. SuchAs a result of these provisions, holders of our common stock may prevent our stockholders from receivingnot receive the full benefit fromof any premium to the market price of our Common Stockcommon stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context.

Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Common Stockcommon stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future. Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-lawsbylaws may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management.management, including provisions providing for staggered terms for our Board, no cumulative voting for the election of directors, and provisions governing director vacancies, which are filled only by remaining directors (including vacancies resulting from removal or other cause). These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.
 
We do not expect to pay dividends on our Common Stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our Common Stock.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
We currently do not expect to declare and pay dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, to develop our business, for working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your Common Stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our Common Stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our Common Stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
 
None.
 
Item 2.
Item 2.Properties.
Properties.
 
Our principal executive office isoffices are located in Stamford, Connecticut,Denver, Colorado, where we have leased approximately 12,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space. This lease terminates on August 8, 2021, with no early termination option, however we plan to move into our new principal executive offices in the second quarter of 2021, also located in Denver, Colorado, at which time our new 11½ year operating lease, covering approximately 73,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space, will commence.

We also continue to lease our former principal executive offices located in Atlanta, Georgia, where we have leased through June 30, 2024 approximately 20,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space. The offices in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as 35 other leased facilities covering an aggregate of approximately 425,000 square feet of office and operational space are utilized substantially in our NEMT Segment.

We also maintain offices for our Personal Care Segment in Valley Stream, New York, where we have leased through November 30, 2025 approximately 14,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space. In addition, we have additional leased space for our Personal Care Segment in 61 locations covering an aggregate of approximately 175,000 square feet of office space in Tucson, Arizona. As of March 2, 2018, NET Services leases space in approximately 40 locations, WD Services leases space in approximately 220 locations, and Matrix leasesoperational space in five locations. .

The lease terms vary andfor all of our facilities, but we believe that they are all generally at market rates. We further believe that our properties are adequate for our current business needs and in any event we believe that we can obtain adequate additional or alternative space at market rates, if needed, to meet our foreseeable business needs.


Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
On June 15, 2015, a putative stockholder class action derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”), captioned Haverhill Retirement System v. Kerley et al., C.A. No. 11149-VCL (the “Haverhill Litigation”)Item 3.Legal Proceedings. The complaint named Richard A. Kerley, Kristi L. Meints, Warren S. Rustand, Christopher Shackelton (the “Individual Defendants”) and Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (“Coliseum Capital Management”) as defendants, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint purported to allege that the dividend rate increase term originally in the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock was an impermissibly coercive measure that impaired the voting rights of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the vote on the removal of certain voting and conversion caps previously applicable to the Preferred Stock (the “Caps”), and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by approving the dividend rate increase term and attempting to coerce the stockholder vote relating to the Company’s Preferred Stock, and by failing to disclose all material information necessary to allow the Company’s stockholders to cast an informed vote on the Caps. The complaint also purported to allege derivative claims alleging that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by entering into the subordinated note and standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and granting Coliseum Capital Management certain stock options. The complaint further alleged that Coliseum Capital Management aided and abetted the Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The complaint sought, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the stockholder vote relating to the dividend rate increase, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
 
On August 31, 2015, after arms’ length negotiations,From time-to-time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the parties reached an agreement in principleordinary course of our business. We record accruals for outstanding legal matters when it is believed to be probable that a loss will be incurred and executedthe amount can be reasonably estimated. Management, following consultation with legal counsel, does not expect the ultimate disposition of any or a Memorandumcombination of Understanding (“MOU”) providingany such ongoing or anticipated matters to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. We cannot predict with certainty, however, the potential for the settlementor outcome of claims concerning the dividend rate increase term and stockholder vote and related disclosure. The MOU stated that the Defendants had entered into the partial settlementany litigation. Regardless of the litigation solely to eliminate the distraction, burden, expense, and potential delayoutcome of further litigation involving claims that have been settled. Pursuant to the partial settlement, the Company agreed to supplement the disclosures in its definitive proxy statement on Schedule


14A (the “2015 Proxy Statement”), Coliseum Capital Management and certain of its affiliates and the Company entered into an amendment to that certain Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement, by and among Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, and The Providence Service Corporation dated as of February 11, 2015 described in the 2015 Proxy Statement, and the Board agreed to adopt a policy related to the Board’s determination each quarter as to whether the Company should pay cash dividends or allow dividends to be paid in the form of PIK dividends on the Preferred Stock, as further described in the supplemental proxy disclosures. On September 2, 2015, Providence issued supplemental disclosures through a supplement to the 2015 Proxy Statement. On September 16, 2015, Providence stockholders approved the removal of the Caps. The Company provided notice of the proposed partial settlement to Providence’s stockholders by December 11, 2015. At a hearing on February 9, 2016, the court denied approval of the settlement. The Court indicated that plaintiff’s counsel could petition the Court for a mootness fee, and that defendants would have the opportunity to oppose any such application.
On January 12, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified amended class action and derivative complaint (the “first amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the first amended complaint named David Shackelton, Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. (collectively, and together with Coliseum Capital Management, LLC, “Coliseum”) and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital Markets”) as additional defendants. The first amended complaint purported to allege direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty against some or all of the Individual Defendants and David Shackelton (collectively, the “Amended Individual Defendants”) regarding the approval of the subordinated note, the rights offering, the standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and the grant to Coliseum Capital Management of certain stock options. The first amended complaint also purported to allege an additional derivative claim for unjust enrichment against Coliseum and further alleged that Coliseum and RBC Capital Markets aided and abetted the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The first amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
On May 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified second amended class action and derivative complaint (the “second amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the second amended complaint named Paul Hastings LLP (“Paul Hastings”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as additional defendants. In addition to previously asserted claims, the second amended complaint purported to assert direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duties against Coliseum Capital Management, in its capacity as the controlling stockholder of the Company, in connection with the subordinated note, the Company’s rights offering of Preferred Stock and the standby purchase agreement with Coliseum Capital Management (the “Financing Transactions”). The second amended complaint also alleged that Paul Hastings breached their fiduciary duties as counsel to the Company in connection with the Financing Transactions and that BofA and Paul Hastings aided and abetted certain of the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties in connection with the Financing Transactions. The second amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, disgorgement of fees paid to RBC Capital Markets, Paul Hastings and BofA for work relating to the Financing Transactions, unspecified damages and other relief.
On May 20, 2016, the Court granted a six-month stay of the proceeding (which was subsequently extended) to allow a special litigation committee, created by the Board, sufficient time to investigate, review and evaluate the facts, circumstances and claims asserted in or relating to this action and determine the Company’s response thereto. On January 20, 2017, the special litigation committee advised the Court that the parties to theparticular litigation and the specialmerits of any particular claim, litigation committee had reached an agreementcan have a material adverse impact on our company due to, among other reasons, any injunctive relief granted which could inhibit our ability to operate our business, amounts paid as damages or in principlesettlement of any such matter, diversion of management resources and defense costs. Refer to settle all of the claims in the litigation. The parties then entered into a proposed settlement agreement which was submittedNote 22, Commitments and Contingencies, for information concerning other potential contingent
43


liabilities matters that do not rise to the Courtlevel of materiality for approval. On September 28, 2017, the Court approved the proposed settlement agreement among the parties that provided for a settlement amountpurposes of $10 million less plaintiff’s legal fees and expenses (the “Settlement Amount”), with 75% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to the Company and 25% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to holders of the Company’s Common Stock other than certain excluded parties. On November 16, 2017, the Company, as a nominal defendant, received a payment of $5.4 million from the Settlement Amount.disclosure hereunder.

Item 4.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.
Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.

44




PART II
 
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Market for our Common Stock
 
Our Common Stock, our only class of common equity, has been quoted on NASDAQ under the symbol “PRSC” since August 19, 2003. PriorEffective January 7, 2021 in conjunction with our name change and rebranding effort, the symbol has been changed to that time there was no public market for our Common Stock."MODV". As of March 5, 2018,February 22, 2021, there were 2220 holders of record of our Common Stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our Common Stock for the period indicated, as reported on NASDAQ Global Select Market:
 High Low
2017   
Fourth Quarter$60.59
 $53.84
Third Quarter$54.99
 $49.77
Second Quarter$47.47
 $43.73
First Quarter$41.80
 $37.65
    
2016   
Fourth Quarter$49.97
 $34.89
Third Quarter$50.30
 $43.01
Second Quarter$53.38
 $43.77
First Quarter$55.28
 $42.03




Stock Performance Graph
 
The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return for our Common Stock, NASDAQ Health Services Index and Russell 2000 Index assuming an investment of $100 in each on December 31, 2012.2015.


  prsc-20201231_g1.jpg




45


Dividends
 
We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and currently do not expect to pay dividends on our Common Stock. In addition, our ability to pay dividends on our Common Stock is limited by the terms of our Credit Agreement and our Preferred Stock.Agreement.  The payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our financial condition, funds from operations, the level of our capital and development expenditures, any restrictions imposed by present or future debt or equity instruments, and changes in federal tax policies, if any.



Issuer Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales, including exchanges or conversions, of equity securities by us during the period covered by this report that were either not registered under the Securities Act or not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or current report on Form 8-K previously filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
     The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchasers” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2020.
PeriodTotal Number
of Shares (or Units)
Purchased
Average Price
Paid per
Share (or Unit)
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Program
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs (000’s) (1)
October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020— $— — $64,777 
November 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020— $— — $64,777 
December 1, 2020 to December 31, 20201,617 (2)$142.55 — $64,777 
Total1,617 (2)—  
Period 
Total Number
of Shares of
Common Stock
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid per
Share
 
Total Number of
Shares of Common
Stock Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Program (2)
 
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares of
Common Stock that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under Program (2)
(in thousands)
Fourth quarter:        
October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017 
 $
 
 $69,640
November 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017 247
 $56.74
 
 $69,640
December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 181,714
 $58.27
 180,270
 $59,137
Total 181,961
 $58.26
 180,270
  

(1)
Includes (i) shares that were acquired from employees in connection with the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from vesting in restricted stock awards; and (ii) the repurchase of shares under the repurchase program authorized by the Board on November 2, 2017. For more information on these repurchases, see Note 11, Stockholders’ Equity, to our consolidated financial statements.
(2)On October 26, 2016, our Board authorized a new repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $100.0(1) On March 11, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $75.0 million in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stock during the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. Through October 26, 2017, a total of 770,808 shares were purchased through this plan for $30.4 million, excluding commission payments.

On November 2, 2017, our Board approved the extension of the Company’s prior stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time-to-time through a combination2020.         
(2) Redeemed shares of open market repurchases (including Rule 10b5-1 plans), privately negotiated transactions, and accelerated share repurchase transactions, at the discretionCommon Stock issuable in respect of vested restricted stock tendered in lieu of cash for payment of income tax withholding amounts by participants in the Company’s officers, and as permitted by securities laws, covenants under existing bank agreements, and other legal requirements. As of December 31, 2017, a total of 180,270 shares were purchased through the extended plan approved on November 2, 2017, for $10.5 million, excluding commission payments. For additional information, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and capital resources”2006 Plan (as defined below).





Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2017 with respect to our equity based compensation plans.

46
Plan category 
(a)
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
(b)
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 606,695
 $48.70
 1,938,666
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 606,695
 48.70
 1,938,666



(1)The number of shares shown in column (b) represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to stock options and other stock-based awards that could be granted in the future under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2006 Plan”).



Item 6.Selected Financial Data. 
We have derived the following selected financial data from the consolidated financial statements and related notes. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future results. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of6.    Selected Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, all of which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Significant transactions which occurred during the periods presented include the acquisition of Ingeus effective May 30, 2014, which primarily comprises our WD Services segment, the investment in Mission Providence, a joint venture in Australia, which commenced operations in 2014 but was sold on September 29, 2017, and our equity interest in Matrix effective October 19, 2016. Matrix, which was originally acquired on October 23, 2014, comprised our HA Services segment through October 19, 2016. The operations of HA Services and Human Services, which was sold effective November 1, 2015, have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.Data. 
 


The information previously required by Item 6 of this Form 10-K has been intentionally omitted, as permitted by the SEC in connection with its adoption of its final rules regarding the amendments to modernize, simplify, and enhance identified financial disclosure requirements of registrants, which became effective beginning February 10, 2020.
47
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (1)(2)(3)(4)(8)(9) (3)(5)(6)(8)(9) (7)(8)(9)(11) (8)(10)(11)  
 (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of operations data:         
Service revenue, net$1,623,882
 $1,578,245
 $1,478,010
 $1,092,880
 $798,766
          
Operating expenses:         
   Service expense1,489,044
 1,452,110
 1,381,154
 988,600
 736,669
   General and administrative expense72,336
 69,911
 70,986
 44,080
 25,590
   Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 
 
 
   Depreciation and amortization26,469
 26,604
 23,998
 17,213
 9,331
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 1,569,628
 1,476,138
 1,049,893
 771,590
Operating income36,033
 8,617
 1,872
 42,987
 27,176
Non-operating expense:         
   Interest expense, net1,278
 1,583
 1,853
 10,224
 6,921
   Other income(5,363) 
 
 
 
   Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 
 
 525
   Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
 
 
   Gain on sale of investment(12,377) 
 
 
 
   Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
 (1,375) (857) (37) 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes64,204
 (1,878) (10,094) 32,800
 19,730
Provision for income taxes4,401
 17,036
 14,583
 8,289
 6,625
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax59,803
 (18,914) (24,677) 24,511
 13,105
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) 108,760
 107,871
 (4,236) 6,333
Net income53,820
 89,846
 83,194
 20,275
 19,438
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(451) 2,082
 502
 
 
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
 $20,275
 $19,438
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:         
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83) $1.63
 $0.95
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
 (0.28) 0.46
Total$3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
 $1.35
 $1.41
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:        
Diluted13,673
 14,667
 15,961
 15,019
 13,810




 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (9) (5)(6)      
 (dollars in thousands)
Balance sheet data:         
Cash and cash equivalents$95,310
 $72,262
 $79,756
 $121,538
 $75,156
Total assets704,090
 685,279
 1,050,202
 1,168,934
 425,954
Long-term obligations, including current
portion
2,984
 3,611
 300,071
 574,613
 123,500
Other liabilities287,543
 306,428
 382,423
 372,907
 151,817
Convertible preferred stock77,546
 77,565
 77,576
 
 
Total stockholders' equity336,017
 297,675
 290,132
 221,414
 150,637


(1)
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes the receipt of the Haverhill Litigation settlement of $5.4 million, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings for further information on the settlement.

(2)Gain on sale of equity investment of $12.4 million relates to the sale of the Company’s equity interest in Mission Providence in 2017. The investment in Mission Providence was part of the WD Services segment.

(3)Discontinued operations, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include losses of $6.0 million and $5.6 million, respectively, related to potential indemnification claims for our historical Human Services segment.

(4)The year ended December 31, 2017 includes a net tax benefit of $16.0 million related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act during the fourth quarter of 2017 due to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities by Providence as a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate. Providence realized a benefit of $19.4 million, partially offset by $3.4 million of increased tax expense resulting from additional equity in net gain of Matrix, due to Matrix's re-measurement of its deferred tax liabilities. In addition, the tax provision was adversely impacted by tax expense of $3.6 million related to the Company’s 2015 Holding Company LTI Program (the “HoldCo LTIP”), for which expense was incurred for financial reporting purposes, but no shares were issued due to the market condition of the award not being satisfied and thus no tax deduction was realized.

(5)On October 19, 2016, we completed the Matrix Transaction. Included in discontinued operations, net of tax, for 2016 is a gain on the transaction, net of tax, totaling $109.4 million. In conjunction with the completion of this transaction, we fully repaid the amounts outstanding on our term loans and Credit Facility in 2016.

(6)During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK.

(7)On November 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our Human Services segment. Included in discontinued operations, net of tax, for 2015 is a gain on the sale of the Human Services segment, net of tax, totaling $100.3 million.

(8)The Company incurred $20.9 million of accelerated expense in 2015 related to restricted shares and cash placed into escrow at the time of the Ingeus acquisition. The shares and cash were placed into escrow concurrent with the payments of the acquisition consideration paid in 2014 for Ingeus; however, because two sellers of Ingeus remained employees post acquisition, the value of the shares and cash was recognized as compensation expense over the escrow term. Acceleration was triggered in 2015 when the two sellers separated from the Company. In addition, in 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company incurred $5.9 million and $4.5 million of expense related to the separation of these two employees. Benefits of $2.0 million, $2.5 million and $16.1 million associated with the favorable resolution of acquisition contingencies and reductions in the fair value of Ingeus contingent consideration are included in general and administrative expenses for 2017, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 2017, 2016 and 2015 expenses also include $2.6 million, $8.5 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of WD Services’ redundancy costs.



(9)Equity in net (gain) loss of investees primarily relates to our investment in Mission Providence during 2015, 2016 and 2017 and Matrix for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Matrix became an equity investment upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction. For Mission Providence, we recorded net loss in investee of $1.4 million, $8.5 million and $11.0 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For Matrix, we recorded $13.4 million in equity in net gain of investee and $1.8 million in equity in net loss of investee related to our equity method investment in Matrix in 2017 and for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively. The equity in net gain from Matrix for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a benefit of $13.6 million related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Act. As a result of the increased equity income, Providence incurred higher tax expense of $3.4 million, which is reflected as a component of “Provision for income taxes” in the table above. The investment in Matrix at December 31, 2017 of $169.7 million is included in “Equity investments” in our consolidated balance sheet.

(10)2014 includes $4.5 million of financing fees that were deferred and fully expensed within interest expense in the fourth quarter of 2014 in relation to bridge financing commitments and $3.0 million of third-party financing fees that are included in general and administrative expense.

(11)2015 includes $2.4 million in Ingeus transaction-related expenses and 2014 includes $11.8 million in acquisition costs primarily related to the acquisitions of Ingeus and Matrix.




Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Item 6.“Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected inanyforward-looking statements, as discussed in “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to those set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.
 
Overview of Our Business
 
Please refer to Item 1. “Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our services and corporate strategy.


Providence owns subsidiariesModivCare Inc. is a technology-enabled, healthcare services company, which provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and investmentsprivate payors and their patients. Its value-based solutions address the SDoH, enable greater access to care, reduce costs, and improve outcomes. ModivCare is a leading provider of NEMT, personal and home care, and nutritional meal delivery. Its core competencies in NEMT include risk underwriting, contact center management, network credentialing, claims management and non-emergency medical transport management. The Company also partners with communities throughout the country, providing food-insecure individuals delivery of nutritional meals. Additionally, its personal and home care services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and skilled nurses primarily engagedto Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the provisionhome setting, including senior citizens and disabled adults.

ModivCare’s solutions help health plans manage risks, close care gaps, reduce costs, and connect members to care. With the combination of its historical NEMT business with its in-home personal care business that was previously operated by Simplura Health Group, as described further below, ModivCare has united two complementary healthcare servicescompanies that serve similar, highly vulnerable patient populations. Collectively, ModivCare is well positioned to remove the barriers of health inequities and address the SDoH.

ModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which operates under the United StatesMatrix Medical Network brand and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which we hold interests comprise the following segments:

NET Services – Nationwide managerrefer to as “Matrix”. Matrix maintains a national network of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governmentscommunity-based clinicians who deliver in-home and managed care organizations.
WD Services – Global provideron-site services, and a fleet of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – Minority interest in Matrix, a nationwide provider of in-home care optimization and management solutions, including CHAs, to members of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018, Matrix acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments,clinics that provide community-based care with advanced diagnostic testing,capabilities and additionalenhanced care optimization services.options. Matrix’s Clinical Care provides risk adjustment solutions that improve health outcomes for individuals and financial performance for health plans. Matrix’s Clinical Solutions provides employee health and wellness services focused on improving employee health with worksite certification solutions that reinforce business resilience and safe return-to-work outcomes. It’s Clinical Solutions also provides clinical trial services which support the delivery of safe and effective clinical trial operations by going where the patients are and ensuring all eligible volunteers, including those with barriers to healthcare access.

In addition to its segments’ operations, the Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions and the results of the Company’s captive insurance company. We are actively monitoring these activities as they relate to our capital allocation and acquisition strategy to ensure alignment with Providence’s overall strategic objectives and its goal of enhancing shareholder value.

Business Outlook and Trends
 
Our performance is affected by a number of trends that drive the demand for our services. In particular, the markets in which we operate are exposed to various trends, such as healthcare industry and demographic dynamics in the U.S. and international government outsourcing and employment dynamics. Over the long term, we believe there are numerous factors that could affect growth within the industries in which we operate, including:

an aging population, which willis expected to increase demand for healthcare services and transportation and, accordingly, in-home personal care services;
a movement towards value-based versus fee for servicefee-for-service and cost plus, or FFS, care and budget pressure on governments, both of which may increase the use of private corporations to provide necessary and innovative services;
increasing demand for in-home care provision, driven by cost pressures on traditional reimbursement models and technological advances enabling remote engagement;engagement, including telehealth and similar internet-based health related services;
technological advancements, which may be utilized by us to improve serviceservices and lower costs, but may also be utilized by others, which may increase industry competitiveness;
changes in UK government policy driven by opposition to the government’s outsourcing of theMCO, Medicaid and Medicare plans increasingly are covering NEMT services provided by WD Services to private companies, which opposition may increase in light of recent events in the UK, including the liquidation of the UK government contractor Carillion plc;
the results of the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union and related political and economic uncertainty in the UK; and
proposals by the President of the United States and Congress to change the Medicaid program, including considering converting the Medicaid program to a block grant format or capping the federal contribution to state Medicaid programs


to a fixed amount per beneficiary, and CMS’ grant of waivers to states relative to the parameters of their Medicaid programs. Enactment of adverse legislation, regulation or agency guidance, may reduce the demand for our services, our ability to conduct some or all of our business and/or reimbursement rates for services performed within our segments.

Historically, our segments have grown through organic expansion into new markets and service lines, organic expansion within existing markets and service lines, increases in the number of members served under contracts we have been awarded, the securing of new contracts, and acquisitions. With respect to acquisitions, we are actively evaluating the optimal industry sectors, such as the non-emergency medical transportation industry and others in which businesses complementary to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our merger and acquisition activity. This ongoing evaluation takes into consideration and balances a number of factors, including the strategic goals, competitive landscape, and growth opportunities of our current segments, in an attempt to direct our capital towards those areas most likely to drive long-term value creation and generate the highest levels of return for our shareholders. In addition, as evidenced by the 2016 Matrix Transaction, we may also enter into strategic partnerships if we feel this provides the best opportunity to maximize shareholder value. The pursuit of our strategy may also result in the disposition of current businesses, as demonstrated in 2017 with our sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence and in 2015 with the sale of our Human Services segment. In making these determinations, we base our decisions on a variety of factors,reasons, including increased access to care, improved patient compliance with treatment plans, social trends, and to promote SDoH, and this trend may be accelerated or reinforced by the availabilityrecent signing into law of alternative opportunitiesThe Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 ("H.R.133"), a component of which mandates that state Medicaid programs ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to deploy capital, maximize shareholder value or other strategic considerations. The outcome of our active evaluationand from health care providers.
48



Since March 2020 and primarily as a result of the optimal industry sectors around whichCOVID pandemic, our Personal Care Segment business has experienced and is expected to focus our mergercontinue to experience a material reduction in volume of service hours and acquisition activityvisits. Volume has been reduced as well as the potential future entry into strategic partnerships or potential disposition of businesses may impact the extent and manner in which we deploy resources across Providence, including strategic and administrative resources between Corporate and Other and our operating segments, and we may incur incremental costs in pursuing these efforts.

Revenues and Expenses
NET Services
NET Services primarily contracts with state Medicaid agencies and managed care organizations for the coordination of their members’ non-emergency transportation needs. Most contracts are capitated, which means we are paid on a per-member, per-month basis for each eligible member. For most contracts, we arrange for transportation of members through our network of independent transportation providers, whereby we negotiate rates and remit payment to the transportation providers. However, for certain contracts, we assume no risk for the transportation network, credentialing and/or payments to these providers. For these contracts, we only provide administrative management services to support the customers efforts to serve its clients.
WD Services
WD Services primarily provides workforce development and offender rehabilitationpatients put services on a global basis that include employment preparation and placement, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs. Populations served by WD Services are broad and include the disabled, recently and long-term unemployed and individuals seeking new skills, as well as individuals that are coping with medical illnesses, are newly graduated from educational institutions, or are being released from incarceration. We contract primarily with national and regional government entities that seek to reduce the unemployment and recidivism rates.
The revenue earned by WD Services under its contracts is often derived through a combination of different revenue channels including, but not limited to, fees contingent upon: (1) the volume of WD end-users referred to or admitted into a specific program, (2) the achievement of defined outcomes for specific individuals, such as a job placement or continued employment, and (3) the achievement of defined outcomes for a population of individuals over a specific time period, such as aggregate employment or recidivism rates. The relative contributions of different revenue channels under a specific contract can fluctuate meaningfully over the life of a contract and thus contribute to significant earnings volatility. Revenue recognition related to our NCS youth programs can be particularly volatilehold due to infection concerns, and/or because they had the timingalternative of services provided, which typically occurreceiving care from family members and others working remotely or furloughed from their jobs.Cases have also been lost due to patient deaths, and new case referrals slowed as referral sources faced disruption from the various restrictions and “stay at home” orders. Our personal care service volumes are not expected to recover to pre-pandemic levels until the vaccines are more universally applied in the second and third quarters of each year. WD Services also earnsmarkets where we provide our services.These depressed volumes will continue to result in lower than expected revenue, under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established at least in the outset ofnear term, in the applicable contract year, althoughPersonal Care Segment following the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.   We bill according to contractual terms, typically after proof of services have been demonstrated, although certain contracts allow for ratable billings based upon expected levels of services, and require reconciliation at the conclusion of the contract year.Simplura acquisition.

As described above, when WD Services enters into new markets and service lines, it often experiences significant costs, which are expensed as incurred, whereas revenue may not be realized until a later date. As a result, WD Services experiences significant variability in its financial results and we therefore believe the results of WD Services are best viewed over a multi-year period.
49




Classification of Operating Expenses
Our “Service expense” line item includes the majority of the operating expenses of NET Services and WD Services as well as our captive insurance company, with the exception of certain costs which are classified as “General and administrative expense”. Service expense also excludes asset impairment charges and depreciation and amortization expenses. In the discussion below, we present the breakdown of service expense by the following major categories: purchased services, payroll and related costs, other operating expenses and stock-based compensation. Purchased services includes the amounts we pay to third-party service providers and are typically dependent upon service volume. Payroll and related costs include all personnel costs of our segments. Other operating expenses include general overhead costs, excluding facilities and related charges, of our segments. Stock-based compensation represents the stock-based compensation expense associated with stock grants to employees of our segments as well as the expense related to restricted stock placed into escrow at the time of the Ingeus acquisition.

Our “General and administrative expense” primarily includes the operating expenses of our corporate office, excluding depreciation and amortization, as well as facilities and related charges of our segments and contingent consideration and acquisition related adjustments, as applicable.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that we believe are important in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements because they require that we use judgment and estimates in applying those policies. We prepare our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in accordance with GAAP.accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as revenue and expenses during the periods reported. We base our estimates on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
There are certain critical estimates that we believe require significant judgment in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:


it requires us to make an assumption because information was not available at the time or it included matters that were highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made; and

changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected may have had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
For more information on each of these significant accounting policies, see Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements. We discuss information about the nature and rationale for our critical accounting estimates below.
 
Accrued Transportation AccrualCosts
 
We accrue the cost of transportation expense within NET Services based on request for services and the amount we expect to be billed by transportation providers, as we generally only pay our transportation providers for completed trips based upon documentation submitted after services have been provided. We accrue transportation costs yet to be adjudicated based on requests for services we have received and the amount we expect to be billed by our transportation providers. The transportation cost accrual requires significant judgment, as the accrualit is based upon contractual rates and mileage estimates, as well as an estimated rate for unknown cancellations, as members may have requested transportation but not notified us of cancellation. Based upon historical experience and contractcontractual terms, we estimate the amount of expensetransportation cost incurred for invoices which have not yet been submitted as of period end.submitted. Actual expensecost could be greater or less than the amounts estimated due to changes in member or transportation provider behavior.behavior that differ from historical trends.
 
Business Combinations
 
We assign the value of the consideration transferred to acquire a business to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. Any excess purchase price paid over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to future expected cash flows from customerpayor relationships, developed technology and trade names, and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from estimates.


 
Recoverability of Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, we review goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) the loss or modification of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or (5) a significant decline in the Company’sour stock price. We perform theour annual goodwill impairment test for all reporting units as of October 1.December 31.


First, we perform qualitative assessments for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment suggests that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value amount, we then perform a quantitative assessment and compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value.

We adopted ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) effective April 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step two of the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if we deem it necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test in an annual or interim period, we recognize an impairment charge equal to the excess, if any, of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
Long-Lived Assets Including Intangibles. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, we review the carrying value of long-lived assets or groups of assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances
50


indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others,but are not limited to, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset or group of assets is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or group of assets or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset or group of assets. The presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset or group of assets may be impaired. In those cases, we assess the recoverability of an asset or group of assets by determining whether the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets over the remaining economic life of the asset or the primary asset in the group of assets. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset or group of assets is not recoverable, we estimate the fair value of the asset or group of assets using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows. If the fair value of those assets or groups of assets is less than carrying value, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value.
 
The use of different estimates or assumptions in determining the fair value of our goodwill and intangible assets may result in different values for those assets, which could result in an impairment or, in the period in which an impairment is recognized, could result in a materially different impairment charge.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed WD Services for impairment, as there were several negative factors impacting the segment, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK; and a change in senior management at WD Services during the fourth quarter. As a result, the Company performed a quantitative test comparing the fair value of the asset groupings comprising WD Services with their carrying amounts and recorded an asset impairment charge of $10.0 million to property and equipment and $4.4 million to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets, which is recorded in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, the Company reviewed the carrying value of goodwill of WD Services, noting the carrying value exceeded the fair value. Therefore, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities, on a fair value basis, with any excess representing the implied value of goodwill of the reporting unit. The fair value was determined using an income approach, which estimates the present value of future cash flows based on management’s forecast of revenue growth rates and operating margins, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Based on this analysis, the carrying value of goodwill of the WD Services reporting unit exceeded the implied fair value and the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.2 million, which is included in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. No impairment charges were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017.





Income Taxes
 
We record income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect our estimation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for book and tax purposes. We determine deferred income taxes based on the differences in accounting methods and timing between financial statement and income tax reporting. Accordingly, we determine the deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference based on the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when we realize the underlying items of income and expense. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our recent earnings experience by jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, and the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, as well as other relevant factors. We may establish a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized. Due to inherent complexities arising from the nature of our businesses, future changes in income tax law, tax sharing agreements or variances between our actual and anticipated operating results, we make certain judgments and estimates. Therefore, actual income taxes could materially vary from these estimates.
 
We record liabilities to address uncertain tax positions we have taken in previously filed tax returns or that we expect to take in a futureour current tax return.returns. The determination for required liabilities is based upon an analysis of each individual tax position, taking into consideration whether it is more likely than not that our tax position, based on technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. For those positions for which we conclude it is more likely than not itthe position will be sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The difference between the amount recognized and the total tax position is recorded as a liability. The ultimate resolution of these tax positions may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Act was enacted, which significantly changes U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporate income tax rates, implementing a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Reform Act permanently reduces the U.S. corporate income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Act also provides for a one-time deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings and profits through the year ended December 31, 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Reform Act. We have recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings and the benefit for the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and included these amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The final impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions we may take as a result of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the financial reporting impact of the Tax Reform Act will be completed no later than the fourth quarter of 2018.

Reinsurance and Self-Insurance Liabilities
 
We historically reinsured a substantial portion of our automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs under reinsurance programs through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company (“SPCIC”), a licensed captive insurance company domiciled in the State of Arizona. In conjunction with the policy renewals on May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renew the expiring policies. However, SPCIC continues to resolve claims under the historical policy years. In addition, under the current policies, the Company retainswe retain liability up to the policy deductibles. In addition, we

We also maintain self-funded health insurance programs for U.S. based employees with a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third partythird-party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims and for a maximum potential claim liability based on member enrollment. Additionally, we recently formed our 90% owned, self-funded (on a pro rata basis with our industry counterpart), insurance captive to provide automobile insurance to transportation providers that elect to participate in the program, with respect to which we have contracted for reinsurance coverage with a third-party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims and for a maximum potential claim liability associated with potential covered transportation provider claims.

We utilize independent actuarial reports to determine the expected losses and in order to recorddetermine the appropriate entriesreserve associated with our historical reinsurance programs, our retained exposure for the deductibles under our current policies, and self-funded health insurance programs.self-insurance liabilities. We regularly analyze our reserves for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to our reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs. We believe our reserves are adequate. However, significant judgment is involved in assessing these reserves such as evaluating historical paid claims, average lag times between the claims’ incurred date, reported dates and paid dates, and the frequency and severity
51


of claims. There may be differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded reserves and any resulting adjustments are recorded once a probable amount is known.




Results of Operations
 


Revenue RecognitionThe following results of operations include the accounts of ModivCare and our subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The Simplura results have been included since the November 18, 2020 acquisition date.
 
NET ServicesService Revenue, net
 
Capitatedcontracts. The majorityService Revenue, net for our NEMT Segment includes contracts predominately with state Medicaid agencies and MCOs for the coordination of NET Services revenue is generated undertheir members’ non-emergency transportation needs. Most contracts are capitated, contracts with customers wherewhich means we assume the responsibility of meeting the covered transportation requirements ofare paid on a specific geographic population based on per-member, per-month feesbasis for the number of members in the customer’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. In some capitated contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These partial payments may be due back to the customer, or additional payments may be due to the Company, after each reconciliation period, based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost compared to the prepayment made.
FFS contracts.  Revenues earned under FFS contracts are based upon contractually established billing rates. Revenues are recognized when the service is provided based upon contractual amounts.
Flat fee contracts. Revenues earned under flat fee contracts are recognized ratably over the covered service period based upon contractually established rates which do not fluctuate with any changes in the membership population who are eligible to receive the transportation services.
member. For most contracts, we arrange for transportation of members through our network of independent transportation providers, whereby we negotiate rates and remit payment to the transportation providers; however,providers. However, for certain contracts, we assume no risk for the transportation network, credentialing and/or payments to these providers. For these contracts, we only provide administrative management services to support the customerscustomers’ efforts to serve itstheir clients. The amount of revenue recognized is based upon the management fee earned.


WDServices
WD Services revenuesCertain other contracts are primarily generated from providing workforce developmentstructured as fee-for-service ("FFS") in which we bill and offender rehabilitation services which include employment preparation and placement, apprenticeship and training, and certain health related services to clients on behalf of governmental and private entities. While the specific terms vary by contract and country, we primarily receive four types of revenue streams under contracts with government entities: referral/attachment fees, job placement and job outcome fees, sustainment fees and incentive fees. Referral/attachment fees are typically upfront payments that are payable when a client is referred by the contracting government entity or that client enters the program. Job placement fees are typically payable when a client is employed. Job outcome fees are typically payable when a client attains and holds employment forcollect a specified minimum period of time. Sustainment fees are typically payable when clients maintain a job outcome past specified employment tenure milestones. Incentive fees are generally based upon a calculationamount for each service that includes a variety of factors and inputs, such as average sustainment rates and client referral rates. Incentive fees vary greatly by contract.
Referral/attachment feewe provide. FFS revenue is recognized ratably over the period of service, based upon an estimated period of time general services will be provided (i.e., the person is placed in a job or reaches the maximum time period for the program). The estimated period of time for which services will be rendered is based upon historical data. Job placement, job outcome and sustainment fee revenue is recognized when certain milestones are achieved, and amounts become billable. Incentive fee revenue is generally recognized when fixed and determinable, frequently at the end of the cumulative calculation period, unless contractual terms allow for earned payments on a fixed or ratable basis.
Revenue is also earned under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established at the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. 

If the rate is adjusted but the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, or if the volume or types of referrals are lower than estimated, our profitability may be negatively impacted. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.

Deferred Revenue
At times we may receive funding for certain services in advance of services being rendered. These amounts are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as “Deferred revenue” until the services are rendered.
Stock Based Compensation
Our primary forms of employee stock-based compensation are stock option awards and restricted stock awards, including certain awards which vest based upon performance conditions. We measure the value of stock option awards on the date of grant at fair value using the appropriate valuation techniques, including the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo option-pricing models. We


recognize the fair value as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period. The pricing models require various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility and expected option term. If any of the assumptions used in the models change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

As a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), effective January 1, 2017, we no longer record stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures and the tax effects of awards are treated as discrete items in the period in which tax windfalls or shortfalls occur. The adoption also impactedthe services are rendered and is reduced by the estimated impact of contractual allowances and policy discounts in the case of third-party payors.

Service Revenue, net for our Personal Care Segment includes hours incurred by our in-home caregivers that are billed to our customers. Our customers consist of third-party payors including, but not limited to, MCOs, hospitals, Medicaid agencies and programs and other home health care providers who subcontract the services of our caregivers.
Classification of Operating Expenses
“Service expense” for our NEMT Segment includes purchased transportation, operational payroll and other operational related costs. Purchased transportation includes the amounts we pay to third-party service providers and is typically dependent upon service volume. Operational payroll predominately includes our contact center operations, customer advocacy and transportation network team. Other operating expenses primarily include operational overhead costs, and operating facilities and related charges. Service expense for our Personal Care Segment includes payroll and other operational related costs for our caregivers to provide in-home care.

“General and administrative expense” primarily includes the expenses of our administrative functions, including executive, IT, finance and accounting, human resources and legal departments.

"Depreciation and amortization expense" includes depreciation of our fixed assets and amortization expense related primarily to our intangible assets.

Discontinued operations. During the periods presented, we completed the following disposition transactions, which resulted in the presentation of cash flowsthe related operations as Discontinued Operations.

On November 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our former Human Services segment and since the computation of earnings per share.

The adoption of ASU 2016-09 will subject our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effects of stock award exercises and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on our income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon the fair valuecompletion of the award atsale, we have recorded additional expenses related to legal proceedings for an indemnified legal matter.

On December 21, 2018, we completed the grant date. See additional discussionsale of substantially all of the operating subsidiaries of our former WD Services segment to APM and APM UK Holdings Limited, an affiliate of APM, except for the segment’s employment services operations in Saudi Arabia. Our contractual counterparties in Saudi Arabia, including an entity owned by the Saudi Arabian government, assumed these operations beginning January 1, 2019. Wind down activities of our Saudi Arabian entity are included in our discontinued operations. Additionally, on June 11, 2018, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to sell Ingeus France for a de minimis amount. The sale was effective on July 17, 2018.

See Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements24, Discontinued Operations, toin our accompanying consolidated financial statements.statements for further information.

Restructuring, Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs
We have engaged in employee headcount optimization actions within WD Services which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction. We accrue for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable. The amounts used in determining severance accruals are based on an estimate of the salaries and related benefit costs payable under existing plans for the number of employees impacted, but the final determination of the actual employees to be terminated is subject to a customary consultation process. The estimate of costs that will ultimately be paid requires significant judgment and to the extent that actual results or updated results differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period such amounts are determined.

Results of operations
Segment reporting. Our segments reflect the manner in which our operations are organized and reviewed by management along our segment lines. management.

52


We operate in two principalthree reportable business segments: NET ServicesNEMT, Personal Care and WD Services.the Matrix Investment. Prior to November 17, 2020, our primary operating segment was NEMT, which provides non-emergency medical transportation services. On November 18, 2020, we acquired Simplura Health Group, resulting in the creation of our Personal Care segment, which operates in the non-medical home care service industry. Our investment in Matrix is also a reportable segment referred to as the “Matrix Investment”. Segment results are based on how our chief operating decision maker manages our business, makes operating decisions and evaluates operating performance. The operating results of the two principal business segmentsour NEMT and Personal Care Segments include revenue and expenses incurred by the segment, as well as an allocation of direct expenses incurred by our activities related to executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal and certain strategic and corporate division on behalf of thedevelopment functions for each segment. Results prior to January 1, 2019 were reclassified to conform with our new segment which primarily relate to insurance and stock-based compensation allocations. Indirect expenses, including unallocated corporate functions and expenses, suchpresentation as executive, finance, accounting, human resources, information technology and legal, as well as the resultsa result of our captive insurance company (the “Captive”) and elimination entries recorded in consolidation are reflected in “Corporate and Other”.
Discontinued operations. Effective October 19, 2016, we completed the Matrix Transaction resultingOrganizational Consolidation. See Note 4, Segments, in our ownership of a noncontrolling interestaccompanying consolidated financial statements for further information on our change in our historical HA Services segment. The HA Services segment results of operations for the periods through October 19, 2016 are separately discussed in the “Discontinued operations, net of tax” section set forth below. For periods subsequent to the transaction, the results of the Matrix Investment are separately discussed in the “Equity in net loss of investees” section set forth below. Additionally, effective November 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our Human Services segment. The Human Services segment results of operations are separately discussed in the “Discontinued operations, net of tax” section set forth below.segments.
53






Year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to year ended December 31, 20162019
 
The following table sets forth results of operations and the percentage of consolidated total revenues represented by items in our consolidated statements of incomeoperations for 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):
 
Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
2017 2016 20202019
$ 
Percentage
of Revenue
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
$
Percentage
of Revenue
$
Percentage
of Revenue
Service revenue, net1,623,882
 100.0 % 1,578,245
 100.0 %Service revenue, net1,368,675 100.0 %1,509,944 100.0 %
       
Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:    
Service expense1,489,044
 91.7 % 1,452,110
 92.0 %Service expense1,078,795 78.8 %1,401,152 92.8 %
General and administrative expense72,336
 4.5 % 69,911
 4.4 %General and administrative expense140,539 10.3 %67,244 4.5 %
Asset impairment charge
  % 21,003
 1.3 %
Depreciation and amortization26,469
 1.6 % 26,604
 1.7 %Depreciation and amortization26,183 1.9 %16,816 1.1 %
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 97.8 % 1,569,628
 99.5 %Total operating expenses1,245,517 91.0 %1,485,212 98.4 %
       
Operating income36,033
 2.2 % 8,617
 0.5 %Operating income123,158 9.0 %24,732 1.6 %
       
Non-operating expense:       Non-operating expense:    
Interest expense, net1,278
 0.1 % 1,583
 0.1 %Interest expense, net17,599 1.3 %850 0.1 %
Other income(5,363) (0.3)% 
  %Other income— — %(277)— %
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) (0.7)% 10,287
 0.7 %
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) (0.8)% 
  %
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
  % (1,375) (0.1)%
Equity in net (income) loss of investeeEquity in net (income) loss of investee(8,860)(0.6)%29,685 2.0 %
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes64,204
 4.0 % (1,878) (0.1)%Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes114,419 8.4 %(5,526)(0.4)%
Provision for income taxes4,401
 0.3 % 17,036
 1.1 %
Provision (benefit) for income taxesProvision (benefit) for income taxes24,805 1.8 %(573)— %
Income (loss) from continuing operations59,803
 3.7 % (18,914) (1.2)%Income (loss) from continuing operations89,614 6.5 %(4,953)(0.3)%
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) (0.4)% 108,760
 6.9 %
Net income53,820
 3.3 % 89,846
 5.7 %
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(451)  % 2,082
 0.1 %
Net income attributable to Providence53,369
 3.3 % 91,928
 5.8 %
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(778)(0.1)%5,919 0.4 %
Net income attributable to ModivCareNet income attributable to ModivCare88,836 6.5 %966 0.1 %
 
Service revenue, net. Consolidated service Service revenue, net for 2017 increased $45.62020 decreased $141.3 million, or 2.9%9.4%, compared to 2016. Revenue2019. The decrease was primarily due to the impact on our NEMT Segment of the reduced transportation volumes we experienced throughout the year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While a majority of our contacts are capitated and we receive monthly payments on a per member basis, we have certain contracts that allow for 2017profit within a certain corridor and once we reach the maximum profit level we discontinue recognizing revenue and instead build a cash liability to return back to the customer upon reconciliation at a later date. Other contracts that are structured as fee-for-service also experienced negative impacts to revenue due to lower volumes. Additionally, our revenue was negatively impacted by a reduction of $40.6 million for certain contracts for which we no longer provide services. These decreases were partially offset by $54.0 million of incremental revenue in our Personal Care Segment due to the acquisition of Simplura in November 2020 as well as $77.1 million of incremental revenue resulting from the NMT acquisition in May 2020.

Service expense. Service expense components are shown below (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20202019
 $Percentage of
Revenue
$Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services845,697 61.8 %1,191,062 78.9 %
Payroll and related costs188,107 13.7 %160,506 10.6 %
Other operating expenses44,991 3.3 %49,584 3.3 %
Total service expense1,078,795 78.8 %1,401,152 92.8 %

54


Service expense for 2020 decreased $322.4 million, or 23.0%, compared to 2016 includes an increase in revenue2019 due primarily to a reduction of NETthird-party transportation costs, defined as "Purchased Services," resulting from the effects of $84.5 million, whichthe COVID-19 pandemic discussed above. This decrease was partially offset by a decreaseincremental payroll and related and other operating costs incurred in revenueour Personal Care Segment due to the acquisition of WD Services of $38.7 million. Excluding the effects of changesSimplura in currency exchange rates, consolidated service revenueNovember 2020.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for 2020 increased 3.4% in 2017 compared to 2016.
Total operating expenses. Consolidated operating expenses for 2017 increased $18.2$73.3 million, or 1.2%109.0%, compared to 2016. Operating expenses2019. The increase was driven by an investment in employees and technology in our NEMT Segment as we continue to execute on our Six-Pillar strategy. Additionally, we saw an increase of $16.5 million of expense related to cash -settled equity awards, $10.5 million of legal, consulting and transaction fees related to the acquisitions of Simplura and NMT during the year, $7.3 million of incremental expense in our Personal Care Segment and $6.2 million of professional fees related to strategic initiatives, rebranding efforts and other restructuring expense related to closure of our Las Vegas contact center.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization for 20172020 increased $9.4 million, or 55.7%, compared to 2016 included an increase2019 primarily as a result of increased intangible assets associated with the NMT acquisition in expenses attributable to NET Services of $95.8 millionMay 2020 and Corporate and Other of $2.5 million. Partially offsetting thesethe Simplura acquisition in November 2020, offset by lower depreciation expense increases was a decrease in WD Services’ operating expenses of $80.2 million. 2016 operating expenses include asset impairment charges of $19.6 million at WD Services and $1.4 million at Corporate and Other.
Operating income. Consolidated operating income for 2017 increased $27.4 million compared to 2016 due to a decrease in the operating lossreduction of WD Services in 2017capital expenditures as a percent of $41.4 million, as compared to 2016. This change was partially offset by a decrease in operating income of NET Services in 2017 as compared to 2016 of $11.3 million and an increase in the operating loss for Corporate and Other of $2.7 million in 2017 as compared to 2016.revenue.



Interest expense, net. Consolidated interest expense, net for 2017 decreased $0.32020 increased $16.7 million, or 19.3%1,970.5%, compared to 2016, and remained consistent as a percentage of revenue.

Other income. Other income in 2017 of $5.4 million represents the settlement received from the Haverhill Litigation, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings for further information on the settlement.

Equity in net (gain) loss of investees. Our equity in net (gain) loss of investees for 2017 of $12.1 million includes an equity in net loss for Mission Providence of $1.4 million through the sale date on September 29, 2017, and an equity in net gain for Matrix of $13.4 million. Our equity in net loss of investees for 2016 of $10.3 million includes an equity in net loss for Mission Providence of $8.5 million and Matrix of $1.8 million. We began reporting Matrix as an equity investment effective October 19, 2016, upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction, and we record our ownership percentage of Matrix’s profit or loss in net loss or gain of investees. Included in Matrix’s 2017 full standalone net income of $26.7 million (which is not consolidated with Providence’s) are depreciation and amortization of $33.5 million, interest expense of $14.8 million, transaction bonuses and other transaction related costs of $3.5 million, equity compensation of $2.6 million, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $2.3 million, merger and acquisition diligence related costs of $0.7 million and income tax benefit of $29.6 million. Matrix’s significant income tax benefit in 2017 primarily related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate 2019, as a result of the Tax Reform Act. Included in Matrix’s 2016 full standalone net loss of $4.2 million (which is not consolidated with Providence’s) are depreciation and amortization of $6.4 million, interest expense of $2.9 million, transaction bonuses and other transactionactivity related costs of $6.4 million, equity compensation of $0.4 million, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $0.4 million and income tax benefit of $2.8 million.

Gain on sale of equity investment. The gain on sale of equity investment of $12.4 million relates to the sale$500.0 million of Senior Unsecured Notes ("the Company’s equity interest in Mission Providence in 2017. The investment in Mission Providence wasNotes") we issued on November 4, 2020. As a part of the WD Services segment. The sale of Mission Providence is not included asbond issuance process, we incurred a discontinued operation as$9.0 million bridge commitment fee that provided a potential funding backstop in the dispositionevent that the Notes did not representmeet the desired subscription level to be used to acquire Simplura. That commitment expired unused upon closing of the Notes and the fee was expensed in Q4 2020. We incurred $4.7 million of accrued interest related to the Notes in Q4 2020 as interest payments are made on a strategic shift that has a major effectbiannual basis.

We also had increased borrowings on our operationsCredit Facility throughout 2020 that allowed us the temporary liquidity needed during the year to execute on our Preferred Share Conversion (as defined below), acquisitions and financial results.stock buyback program. As of December 31, 2020 we had no borrowings on our Credit Facility.

Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions. The foreign currencyEquity in net (income) loss of $0.3 millioninvestee. Our equity in net (income) loss of investee for 2020 and gain2019 represents our proportional share of $1.4 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively, werethe results of Matrix, of which we own 43.6%. The increase in Matrix’s net income in 2020 was primarily due to translation adjustmentsa new employee health and wellness product offering that was launched in the second quarter of our foreign subsidiaries.2020 for companies maintaining critical operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the company saw increased revenue and income related to a clinical solutions product offering following the October 2020 acquisition of Biocerna LLC, a diagnostic company that, among other tests, provides rapid COVID-19 test kits.
 
Provision for income taxes. Our effective tax raterates from continuing operations for 20172020 and 2019 were a provision of 21.7% and a benefit of 10.4%, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2020 was 6.9%slightly higher than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to state taxes and certain nondeductible expenses offset by tax credits and the favorable impact of the CARES Act on the Company's 2018 U.S. net operating losses ("NOLs"). The impact of the CARES Act was to allow the Company to carry NOLs back five years and offset income taxed at 35% compared to a carryforward tax rate of 21%. The effective tax rate for 2019 was substantially lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%21% primarily due to the impact of the Tax Reform Act. The tax provision includes a benefit of $16.0 million related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act during the fourth quarter of 2017, consisting of a net tax benefit of $19.4 million from the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities from the lower U.S. corporate tax rate,state taxes and certain nondeductible expenses partially offset by additional tax expense of $3.4 million due to an increase in our equity in net gain of Matrix as a result of Matrix's re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities. In addition, the Company incurred tax expense of $3.6 million related to the HoldCo LTIP, for which expense was recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon fair value of the award at the grant date, but no shares will be issued due to the market condition of the award not being satisfied. This tax expense was the result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, which subjects our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effectsfavorable impact of stock award exercisesoption deductions and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on ourtax credits.

(Loss) income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes.

During 2016, we recognized an income tax provision despite having a loss from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit could not be recognized, and non-deductible expenses, the Company recognized taxable income for this year upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.
Discontinueddiscontinued operations, net of tax. Discontinued (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax, includes the activity ofrelated to our former WD Services and Human Services segments. See Note 24, Discontinued Operations, to our accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $0.8 million in 2020 was primarily due to costs incurred for personnel, facilities and miscellaneous administrative expense in our continuing efforts to wind down the WD Services Saudi Arabian entity.

For 2019, income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $5.9 million as a result of an insurance settlement related to an indemnification matter in our Human Services segment, and our former HA Services segment, composed entirelynet of our 100% ownership in Matrix untilcosts to obtain the completion of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016. For 2017,settlement. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, for our Human Services segment was a loss of $6.0 million, which primarily related to the accrual of a contingent liability of $9.0 million related to the settlement of indemnification claims and associated legal costs of $0.7 million, partially offset by a related tax benefit. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our Human Services segment was a loss of $5.6 million in 2016, which included an accrual of $6.0 million with respect to potential indemnification claims, legal costs of $1.1 million related to these potential claims and transaction related expenses of $0.8 million, partially offset by a related tax benefit. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our HA Services segment was income of $114.3 million for 2016, which included a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $109.4 million. See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.


Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relates to a minority interest held by a third-party operating partner in our company servicing the offender rehabilitation contract in our WD Services segment.
Segment Results. The following analysis includes discussion of each of our segments.
NET Services
NET Services financial results are as follows for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net1,318,220
 100.0% 1,233,720
 100.0%
Service expense1,227,426
 93.1% 1,132,857
 91.8%
General and administrative expense11,779
 0.9% 11,406
 0.9%
Depreciation and amortization13,275
 1.0% 12,375
 1.0%
Operating income65,740
 5.0% 77,082
 6.2%
Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net for NET Services in 2017 increased $84.5 million, or 6.8%, compared to 2016. The increase was related to net increased revenue from existing contracts, including successfully renewed contracts, of $82.5 million, due to the net impact of membership and rate changes. Included within net rate changes are the positive impacts of final agreements on rate adjustments related to existing contracts that experienced increased utilization in 2017 as well as the release of previously accrued revenue hold-backs based on certain contract performance requirements on a significant contract. Additionally, the impact of new contracts, including new managed care organization contracts in Florida and New York, contributed $93.8 million of revenue for 2017. These increases were partially offset by the $91.8 million impact on revenue of contracts we no longer serve, including a contract with the state of New York. 

Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services1,009,518
 76.6% 927,321
 75.2%
Payroll and related costs165,666
 12.6% 162,000
 13.1%
Other operating expenses51,720
 3.9% 42,478
 3.4%
Stock-based compensation522
 % 1,058
 0.1%
Total service expense1,227,426
 93.1% 1,132,857
 91.8%
Service expense for 2017 increased $94.6 million, or 8.3%, compared to 2016. The increase in service expense was primarily attributable to the impact of new managed care organization contracts in California, Florida and New York. Purchased services as a percentage of revenue increased from 75.2% in 2016 to 76.6% in 2017 primarily attributable to an increase in utilization across multiple contracts. The higher utilization was in part driven by increased Medicaid reimbursement in New Jersey for certain medical services, increasing the demand for transportation services, and increased utilization across multiple managed care contracts in California. Additionally, due to milder winter weather conditions during the first quarter of 2017, we experienced above expected utilization; however, we experienced lower utilization for contracts in the third quarter of 2017 due in part to the impact of Hurricane Irma. The increase in purchased services as a percentage of revenue caused by increased utilization was partially offset by the successful implementation of initiatives aimed at lowering transportation costs on a per trip and per mile basis as well as the release of a reserve based upon the finalization of a contract amendment with a state customer.

Payroll and related costs as a percentage of revenue decreased from 13.1% in 2016 to 12.6% in 2017 due to efficiencies gained from multiple process improvement initiatives, including those aimed at lowering payroll expense across our reservation


and operation center networks, as well as a decrease in chief executive officer compensation expense due to the transition of the chief executive officer position during 2017. Other operating expenses increased for 2017 as compared to 2016 primarily attributable to an incremental $4.1 million of value enhancement and related costs incurred for external resources used in the design and implementation of NET Services member experience and value enhancement initiatives in 2017, as well as increased software and hardware maintenance costs associated with increased use of information technology.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses in 2017 increased $0.4 million, or 3.3%, as compared to 2016, due to increased facility costs resulting from the overall growth of our operations. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense remained constant at 0.9%.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.9 million primarily due to the addition of long-lived assets relating to information technology projects. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization remained constant at 1.0%. At December 31, 2017, NET Services has $11.9 million of construction and development in progress related to its LCAD NextGen technology system, which is expected to be placed into service in 2018.
WD Services
WD Services financial results are as follows for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net305,662
 100.0% 344,403
 100.0 %
        
Service expense265,417
 86.8% 320,147
 93.0 %
General and administrative expense25,438
 8.3% 30,300
 8.8 %
Asset impairment charge
 % 19,588
 5.7 %
Depreciation and amortization12,851
 4.2% 13,824
 4.0 %
Operating income (loss)1,956
 0.6% (39,456) (11.5)%

Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net in 2017 decreased $38.7 million, or 11.2%, compared to 2016. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, service revenue decreased 8.9% in 2017 compared to 2016, which was primarily related to the anticipated decline of referrals under the segment’s Work Programme contracts in the UK, as well as decreased revenue under our offender rehabilitation program. While WD Services has successfully secured contracts under the UK's new Work and Health Programme, the successor program to the Work Programme, with a combined total value of approximately $195 million over 5 years, revenues under these new contracts were negligible in 2017 and did not offset declines in revenue experienced under the Work Programme contracts. These decreases were partially offset by increases across various employability contracts outside the UK, including in Australia, France, Germany and the U.S., as well as increased revenue from our health services contract in the UK. 2017 includes the impact of $5.2 million of revenue recognized under the offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the contract year ended March 31, 2017, whereas 2016 includes $5.4 million of revenue recognized under the offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the prior contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016.















Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Payroll and related costs177,195
 58.0% 210,293
 61.1 %
Purchased services49,491
 16.2% 65,363
 19.0 %
Other operating expenses38,675
 12.7% 44,502
 12.9 %
Stock-based compensation56
 % (11)  %
Total service expense265,417
 86.8% 320,147
 93.0 %

Service expense in 2017 decreased $54.7 million, or 17.1%, compared to 2016. Payroll and related costs decreased primarily as a result of declining referrals under the segment’s primary employability program in the UK as well as redundancy plans that better aligned headcount with service delivery volumes, resulting in a decrease of payroll and related costs as a percentage of revenue. Payroll and related costs include $2.6 million and $8.5 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, of termination benefits related to redundancy plans. Purchased services decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily as a result of a decline in client referrals under our primary employability program in the UK, which resulted in a decline in the use of outsourced services. Other operating expenses decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily as a result of a decline in consulting related costs and information technology maintenance costs.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense in 2017 decreased $4.9 million compared to 2016. The decrease was due to office closures associated with the restructuring of the UK operations, as well as lower rent for certain offices. Additionally, $2.0 million of the decrease related to the impact of acquisition related contingencies that were favorably resolved in 2017, resulting in a benefit to general and administrative expense.
Asset impairment charge. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK. No impairment charges were incurred in 2017.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2017 decreased $1.0 million compared to 2016, primarily due to the asset impairment charges incurred during the fourth quarter of 2016, which decreased the value of our intangible assets and certain property and equipment.

Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other includes the headcount and professional service costs incurred at the Providence corporate level, our captive insurance company, and elimination entries to account for inter-segment transactions. Corporate and Other financial results are as follows for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ $
Service revenue, net
 122
    
Service expense (a)(3,799) (894)
General and administrative expense35,119
 28,205
Asset impairment charge
 1,415
Depreciation and amortization343
 405
Operating loss(31,663) (29,009)


(a)Negative amounts are present for this line item due to changes in estimate for claims incurred but not reported, as well as elimination entries that are included in Corporate and Other. Certain offsetting amounts are reflected in the financial results of our operating segments.

Operating loss. Corporate and Other operating loss in 2017 increased by $2.7 million, or 9.1%, as compared to 2016 primarily due to an increase in cash settled stock-based compensation expense of $3.6 million, primarily as a result of an increase in the Company’s stock price in 2017 as compared to a decrease in 2016, an increase in share settled stock-based compensation expense of $2.7 million, primarily related to an increase in expense for the HoldCo LTIP despite this program expiring with no shares due to any employees, expense for stock options issued to a former chief executive officer upon separation from the Company, and a benefit recorded in 2016 for performance based units, with no corresponding benefit in 2017, as well as an increase of $3.8 million of professional costs due to activities associated with our increased focus on strategic initiatives. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in insurance loss reserves of $3.5 million in 2017, versus $2.5 million in 2016, due to favorable claims history of our Captive reinsurance programs, as well as decreased costs of the Captive operations due to no longer writing new policies as of May 2017, which is included in “Service expense”, decreased accounting, legal and professional fees included in “General and administrative expense”, and decreased asset impairment charges, as $1.4 million was recorded in 2016 in relation to the sale of a building.

General and administrative expense includes stock-based compensation for the HoldCo LTIP of $4.7 million and $3.3$0.1 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively. No shares will be distributed under the HoldCo LTIP as the volume weighted average of Providence’s stock price over the 90-day trading period ended on December 31, 2017 was less than $56.79. As such, as of December 31, 2017, we accelerated all remaining unrecognized compensation expense for the Holdco LTIP as there was no further requisite service period associated with the award resulting in an acceleration of expense of $1.1 million. General and administrative expense also includes $0.4 million and $1.6 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to a shareholder lawsuit.

Costs associated with the resignation of Mr. Lindstrom during the year ended December 31, 2017 include2019. We incurred costs related to the wind-down of the WD Services Saudi Arabian entity, offset by cash compensation related items of $0.9 million, stock-based compensation of $0.7 million, and other costs of $0.2 million. These costs are recorded as part of “General and administrative expense”.distributions from WD Services.






55


Year endedEnded December 31, 20162019 compared to year ended December 31, 20152018
 
The following table sets forth results of operations and the percentage of consolidated total revenues represented by items in our consolidated statements of incomeoperations for 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 
Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
2016 2015 20192018
$ 
Percentage
of Revenue
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
$
Percentage
of Revenue
$
Percentage
of Revenue
Service revenue, net1,578,245
 100.0 % 1,478,010
 100.0 %Service revenue, net1,509,944 100.0 %1,384,965 100.0 %
       
Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:  
Service expense1,452,110
 92.0 % 1,381,154
 93.4 %Service expense1,401,152 92.8 %1,253,608 90.5 %
General and administrative expense69,911
 4.4 % 70,986
 4.8 %General and administrative expense67,244 4.5 %77,093 5.6 %
Asset impairment charge21,003
 1.3 % 
  %Asset impairment charge— — %14,175 1.0 %
Depreciation and amortization26,604
 1.7 % 23,998
 1.6 %Depreciation and amortization16,816 1.1 %15,813 1.1 %
Total operating expenses1,569,628
 99.5 % 1,476,138
 99.9 %Total operating expenses1,485,212 98.4 %1,360,689 98.2 %
       
Operating income8,617
 0.5 % 1,872
 0.1 %Operating income24,732 1.6 %24,276 1.8 %
       
Non-operating expense:       Non-operating expense:    
Interest expense, net1,583
 0.1 % 1,853
 0.1 %Interest expense, net850 0.1 %1,783 0.1 %
Equity in net loss of investees10,287
 0.7 % 10,970
 0.7 %
Gain on foreign currency transactions(1,375) (0.1)% (857) (0.1)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1,878) (0.1)% (10,094) (0.7)%
Provision for income taxes17,036
 1.1 % 14,583
 1.0 %
Income (loss) from continuing operations(18,914) (1.2)% (24,677) (1.7)%
Discontinued operations, net of tax108,760
 6.9 % 107,871
 7.3 %
Net income89,846
 5.7 % 83,194
 5.6 %
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest2,082
 0.1 % 502
  %
Net income attributable to Providence91,928
 5.8 % 83,696
 5.7 %
Other incomeOther income(277)— %— — %
Equity in net loss of investeeEquity in net loss of investee29,685 2.0 %6,158 0.4 %
Gain on remeasurement of cost method investmentGain on remeasurement of cost method investment— — %(6,577)(0.5)%
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes(5,526)(0.4)%22,912 1.7 %
(Benefit) provision for income taxes(Benefit) provision for income taxes(573)— %4,684 0.3 %
(Loss) income from continuing operations(Loss) income from continuing operations(4,953)(0.3)%18,228 1.3 %
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxIncome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax5,919 0.4 %(37,053)(2.7)%
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)966 0.1 %(18,825)(1.4)%
Net loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interestNet loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest— — %(156)— %
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCareNet income (loss) attributable to ModivCare966 0.1 %(18,981)(1.4)%
 
Service revenue, net. Consolidated serviceService revenue net for 2016our NEMT Segment for 2019 increased $100.2$125.0 million, or 6.8%9.0%, compared to 2015. Revenue for 2016 compared to 2015 included an increase in revenue of NET Services of $150.7 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in revenue of WD Services of $50.7 million. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, consolidated service2018. Service revenue increased 8.8%by $148.0 million as a result of increased volume within existing contracts as well as rate changes, including retroactive revenue benefits, in 2016 comparedaddition to 2015.
Total operating expenses. Consolidated operating expenses for 2016 increased $93.5$103.1 million or 6.3%, compared to 2015. Operating expenses for 2016 compared to 2015 included an increase in expenses attributable to NET Servicesnew contracts, including the acquisition of $144.8 millionCirculation in the fourth quarter of 2018, MCO contracts in Minnesota and Corporate and Other of $2.2 million. Partially offsetting these expense increases was a decrease in WD Services’ operating expenses of $53.6 million. Operating expenses included asset impairment charges of $19.6 million at WD Services and $1.4 million at Corporate and Other during 2016, while no such charges were incurred in 2015.
Operating income. Consolidated operating income for 2016 increased $6.7 million compared to 2015 due to an increase in operating income of NET Services in 2016 as compared to 2015 of $5.9 millionLouisiana and a decreasenew state contract in the operating loss of WD Services in 2016 as compared to 2015 of $2.9 million, although WD Services’ new offender rehabilitation program incurred an operating loss in 2016 as compared to operating income in 2015. In addition, France continued to experience a significant operating loss in 2016, consistent with 2015.West Virginia. These changesincreases were partially offset by an increase$126.1 million for contracts we no longer serve, including a state contract in Rhode Island and certain MCO contracts in California, Florida, New Mexico, New York and Louisiana.
Service expense. Service expense for our NEMT Segment included the operating lossfollowing for Corporate2019 and Other2018 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20192018
 $Percentage of
Revenue
$Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services1,191,062 78.9 %1,054,788 76.2 %
Payroll and related costs160,506 10.6 %152,974 11.0 %
Other operating expenses49,584 3.3 %45,846 3.3 %
Total service expense1,401,152 92.8 %1,253,608 90.5 %
56



Service expense for 2019 increased $147.5 million, or 11.8%, compared to 2018 due primarily to higher purchased transportation costs and operational payroll and related costs. Transportation costs increased as a result of $2.0both higher utilization across multiple contracts and higher per unit cost. Payroll and related costs increased in our contact centers as a result of higher volume as well as the acquisition of Circulation.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses in 2019 decreased $9.8 million, drivenor 12.8%, as compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily bya result of net cost savings associated with the Organizational Consolidation.
Asset impairment charge. During2018, following the acquisition of Circulation, we recorded a $14.2 million asset impairment chargeas a result of $1.4the abandonment of our internal LCAD NextGen technology software project. There was no such impairment during 2019.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization for 2019 increased $1.0 million in 2016.or 6.3% compared to 2018 primarily as a result of increased intangible assets associated with the Circulation acquisition, and net capital expenditures during the comparative periods.



Interest expense, net. Consolidated interest expense, net for 20162019 decreased $0.3$0.9 million, or 14.6%52.3%, compared to 2015. The decrease is primarily related to2018, as a result of lesser borrowings on the repayment of the related party note during 2015, which was partially offset by higher commitment fees on our Credit Facility for 2016during 2019 as compared to 2015.2018. Funds were borrowed under the Credit Facility during 2018 to fund the acquisition of Circulation and repaid prior to December 31, 2018.


Equity in net loss of investees. Equity in net loss of investees primarily relates to our investments in Mission Providence and Matrix. Mission Providence, which is part of WD Services, began providing services in July 2015. We record 75% of Mission Providence’s profit or loss in equity in net loss of investees. We began reporting Matrix as an equity investment effective October 19, 2016, upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction.investee. Our equity in net loss of investees related to WD Servicesinvestee for 2019 and Matrix totaled $8.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for 2016.2018 represents our proportional share of the net loss of Matrix. Included in Matrix’s results (which are not consolidated with Providence's) is interest expense2019 full standalone net loss of $2.9$69.4 million was $55.1 million of asset impairment charges. Included in Matrix’s 2018 full standalone net loss of $20.0 million were integration related costs of $6.5 million, and transactionmerger and acquisition diligence related expensescosts of $6.0 million, which includes $4.0 million of transaction incentive compensation payable to the Matrix management team.$2.3 million.

Gain on foreign currency transactions.remeasurement of cost method investment. On September 21, 2018, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Circulation. The foreign currency gainspurchase price was comprised of $1.4cash consideration of $45.1 million paid to Circulation’s equity holders (including holders of vested Circulation stock options), other than ModivCare. Our initial investment in Circulation was $3.0 million. As a result of the transaction, the fair value of this pre-acquisition interest increased to $9.6 million, and $0.9thus we recognized a gain of $6.6 million during 2018.
Provision for 2016income taxes. Our effective tax rates from continuing operations for 2019 and 2015, respectively,2018 were a benefit of 10.4% and a provision of 20.4%, respectively.The effective tax rate for 2019 was substantially lower than the federal statutory rate of 21.0% primarily due to translation adjustmentsstate taxes and certain nondeductible expenses partially offset by the favorable impact of our foreign subsidiaries.
Provisionstock option deductions and tax credits. The effective tax rate for income taxes. We recognized an2018 was slightly lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% due to tax credits and no income tax provision for 2016on the $6.6 million gain on the remeasurement of cost method investment, offset in part, by state taxes and 2015 despite having lossescertain nondeductible expenses.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit currently cannot be recognized, and non-deductible expenses such as amortization of deferred consideration related to the Ingeus acquisition, the Company recognized taxable income for these years upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.
Discontinueddiscontinued operations, net of tax. Discontinued Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, includes the activity ofrelated to our former HumanWD Services segment and human services segments. See Note 24, Discontinued Operations, to our former HA Services segment, composed entirely of our 100% equity interest in Matrix until the completion of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016. Discontinuedaccompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information.

For 2019, income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for our Humanformer human services segment was $6.0 million as a result of an insurance settlement related to an indemnification matter, net of costs to obtain the settlement. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, for WD Services was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We incurred costs related to the wind-down of the WD Services Saudi Arabian entity, offset by cash distributions from WD Services. The operations in Saudi Arabia, including personnel, leased facilities and certain assets necessary to provide the employment services, were transferred to a third party as of January 1, 2019, and thus we are no longer providing services in Saudi Arabia; however, we continue to incur costs related to the shutdown of our remaining Saudi Arabian entity.

For 2018, the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, includes the loss of our former WD Services segment of $37.0 million and of our former human services segment of $0.1 million. Included in the loss was a loss of $5.6 million in 2016 and income of $101.8 million in 2015, respectively. 2016 Human Services results include an accrual of $6.0 million with respect to potential indemnification claims, legal costs of $1.1 million related to these potential claims and transaction related expenses of $0.8 million. 2015 Human Services segment results include a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $100.3 million. Discontinued$1.8 million as well as an asset impairment charge of $9.2 million related to the sale of WD Services operations netin France in the second quarter of tax for our HA Services segment was income of $114.3 million and $6.1 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. 2016 HA Services segment results include a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $109.4 million. See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.2018.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. Net For 2018, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relatesnon-controlling interest related to thea minority interest associated withheld by a third-party operating partner in our company servicing the offender rehabilitation contract inwithin our historical WD Services segment. As this contract is currently experiencing losses, as further discussed below, we have a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Segment Results. The following analysis includes discussion of each of our segments.
NET Services
NET Services financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
We held no such interest in 2019.
57


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net1,233,720
 100.0% 1,083,015
 100.0%
Service expense1,132,857
 91.8% 991,659
 91.6%
General and administrative expense11,406
 0.9% 10,704
 1.0%
Depreciation and amortization12,375
 1.0% 9,429
 0.9%
Operating income77,082
 6.2% 71,223
 6.6%
Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net for NET Services in 2016 increased $150.7 million, or 13.9%, compared to 2015.  The increase related to the impact of new contracts which contributed $76.4 million of revenue in 2016, including contracts in California and Florida, and an increase in revenue associated with existing contracts of $119.8 million due to the net impact of membership and rate changes, partially offset by the loss of certain contracts that resulted in a decrease in revenue of $45.5 million.  


Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services927,321
 75.2% 814,632
 75.2%
Payroll and related costs162,000
 13.1% 141,669
 13.1%
Other operating expenses42,478
 3.4% 34,634
 3.2%
Stock-based compensation1,058
 0.1% 724
 0.1%
Total service expense1,132,857
 91.8% 991,659
 91.6%
Service expense for 2016 increased $141.2 million, or 14.2%, compared to 2015. The increase in service expense was primarily attributable to an increase in purchased transportation services due primarily to higher transportation volume. Purchased services as a percentage of revenue remained constant at 75.2%. Additionally, our payroll and related costs increased for 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to the hiring of employees to support new contracts and increased call volume associated with increased utilization, as well as an increase of $1.2 million in expense for the long-term incentive plan for management put into place in the fourth quarter of 2015 and separation related charges for NET Services’ former chief executive officer during 2016 of $0.8 million. Our other operating expenses also increased for 2016 as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to increased bad debt expense, including $2.1 million of expense related to one specific customer, and costs incurred for external resources used in the design and implementation of NET Services member experience and value enhancement initiatives of $2.0 million. Stock-based compensation increased $0.3 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to the expense associated with new stock-based compensation awards granted in 2016 that vested in January 2017. 
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses in 2016 increased $0.7 million, or 6.6%, as compared to 2015, due to increased facility costs resulting from the overall growth of our operations. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense decreased slightly from 1.0% for 2015 to 0.9% for 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $2.9 million primarily due to the addition of long-lived assets in our call centers. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization increased slightly from 0.9% for 2015 to 1.0% for 2016.
WD Services
WD Services financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net344,403
 100.0 % 395,059
 100.0 %
        
Service expense320,147
 93.0 % 393,803
 99.7 %
General and administrative expense30,300
 8.8 % 29,846
 7.6 %
Asset impairment charge19,588
 5.7 % 
  %
Depreciation and amortization13,824
 4.0 % 13,776
 3.5 %
Operating income (loss)(39,456) (11.5)% (42,366) (10.7)%

Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net in 2016 decreased $50.7 million, or 12.8%, compared to 2015. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, service revenue decreased 5.1% in 2016 compared to 2015, which was primarily related to revenue declines associated with declining referrals and an altered pricing structure under the segment’s primary employability program in the UK and a revised bidding strategy in certain markets. Implemented in late 2015, the overhauled bidding process emphasized the pursuit of only those contracts that meet certain investment criteria, including risk-weighted return


on capital thresholds, and involve the provision of services where we believe our experience will allow us to deliver differentiated and improved outcomes for our clients. As a result of this enhanced criteria and a challenging UK outsourcing industry, new contracts have been more infrequent and smaller in nature. The decrease was partially offset by two new contracts in France that began in 2015 and growth of NCS youth programs in 2016. WD Services additionally recognized revenue of $5.4 million for 2016 under its offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016, which partially offset the decline in revenue under this contract for 2016.
Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Payroll and related costs210,293
 61.1 % 249,130
 63.1%
Purchased services65,363
 19.0 % 78,498
 19.9%
Other operating expenses44,502
 12.9 % 45,418
 11.5%
Stock-based compensation(11)  % 20,757
 5.3%
Total service expense320,147
 93.0 % 393,803
 99.7%

Service expense in 2016 decreased $73.7 million, or 18.7%, compared to 2015. Payroll and related costs decreased primarily as a result of the redundancy plans implemented in the fourth quarter of 2015 that were designed to better align headcount with service delivery volumes as well as declining referrals under the segment’s primary employability program in the UK. Partially offsetting these decreases was increased payroll and related costs associated with a significant new offender rehabilitation program that began in 2015 and higher payroll expenses in France associated with new programs implemented in 2015 and 2016. As referenced above, both the segment’s new offender rehabilitation program and operations in France had significant operating losses in 2016. In addition, $8.5 million in termination benefits related to three redundancy plans contributed to losses in 2016. Purchased services decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily as a result of a decline in client referrals under our primary employability program in the UK which required less use of outsourced services. Stock-based compensation decreased $20.8 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to expenses totaling $16.1 million related to the settlement of outstanding awards in the fourth quarter of 2015 in relation to the separation of two executives, who were also sellers of Ingeus to Providence, as further described in Note 13, Stock-Based Compensation and Similar Arrangements¸ to our consolidated financial statements.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense in 2016 increased $0.5 million compared to 2015. $2.5 million of the increase relates to the impact of the reduction in the fair value of contingent consideration that was recorded in 2015. Offsetting this increase were decreased facility costs of $2.0 million primarily due to the closure of numerous sites in the UK, partially offset by the opening of new sites in France during 2016.
Asset impairment charge. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK. No impairment charges were incurred in 2015.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2016 was flat compared to 2015.



Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other includes the headcount and professional service costs incurred at the Providence corporate level, our captive insurance company, and elimination entries to account for inter-segment transactions. Corporate and Other financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ $
Service revenue, net (a)122
 (64)
    
Service expense (a)(894) (4,308)
General and administrative expense28,205
 30,436
Asset impairment charge1,415
 
Depreciation and amortization405
 793
Operating loss(29,009) (26,985)
(a)Negative amounts are present for this line item due to elimination entries that are included in Corporate and Other. Offsetting amounts are reflected in the financial results of our operating segments.

Operating loss. Corporate and Other operating loss in 2016 increased by $2.0 million, or 7.5%, as compared to 2015 primarily due to a $4.5 million decrease in benefits associated with favorable claims experiences on our reinsurance and self-insured programs, an asset impairment charge of $1.4 million in 2016 and a $0.4 million net increase in compensation related expenses. The $0.4 million net increase in compensation expenses in 2016 was primarily due to an increase in short-term incentives and $1.0 million of compensation related to the sale of the Company’s Human Services segment in 2015. Also included in 2016 were $1.6 million of expenses related to a shareholder lawsuit, an increase of $0.8 million from 2015. These increases in expense were partially offset by a decrease in various professional fees of $4.0 million. The Company anticipates continued reductions in multiple Corporate and Other expense categories in 2017.

Seasonality
 
Our NEMT Segment's quarterly operating resultsincome and operating cash flows normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in our business, principally due in part to seasonal factors, unevenlower transportation demand for servicesduring the winter season and the timing of new contracts, which impact the amount of revenues earned and expenses incurred. NET Services experiences fluctuations inhigher demand during the summer season.

Our Personal Care Segment’s quarterly operating income and winter seasons. Due to higher demandcash flows also normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in the summer months,business, principally due to somewhat lower demand during the winter months, and a primarily fixed revenue stream based on a per-member, per-month payment structure, NET Services normally experiences lower operating marginsfor in-home services from caregivers during the summer season and higher operating marginsperiods with major holidays, as patients may spend more time with family and less time alone needing outside care during the winter. WD Services is impacted by both the timing of commencement and expiration of major contracts. Under many of WD Services’ contracts, we invest significant sums of money in personnel, leased office space, purchased or developed technology, and other costs, and generally incur these costs prior to commencing services and receiving payments. This results in significant variability in financial performance and cash flows between quarters and for comparativethose periods. It is expected that future contracts will be structured in a similar fashion. However, the Company does not expect a large variability in financial performance upon the commencement of WD Service’s newly secured Work and Health Programme contracts as the upfront implementation investments needed for these contracts are expected to be significantly less than those associated with other large contract commencements undertaken in the past, such as the offender rehabilitation program in 2016. In addition, under the majority of WD Services’ contracts, the Company relies on its customers, which include government agencies, to provide referrals, for which the Company can provide services and earn revenue. The timing and magnitude of referrals can fluctuate significantly, leading to volatility in revenue.



Liquidity and capital resourcesCapital Resources
 
Short-term capital requirements consist primarily of recurring operating expenses, and new revenue contract start-up costs including workforce restructuring costs.and costs associated with our strategic initiatives. We expect to meet anyour cash requirements through available cash on hand, cash generated from our operating segments,operations, net of capital expenditures, and borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility (as defined below).




Cash flow from operating activities was our primary source of cash during 2017, and included $5.4 million received from the settlement of the Haverhill Litigation. Additionally, 2017 included $15.6$348.4 million in proceeds from the sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence which is included in cash provided by investing activities.2020. Our balance of cash, and cash equivalents and restricted cash was $95.3$183.4 million and $72.3$61.7 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively, including $40.1 million and $21.4 million held in foreign countries,2019, respectively. The December 31, 2017 foreign cash balance includes the proceeds from the sale of Mission Providence of $15.6 million. Such cash held in foreign countries is generally used to fund foreign operations, although it may also be used to repay intercompany indebtedness existing between Providence and its foreign subsidiaries. As of March 5, 2018, the Company transferred $13.9 million from its foreign operations to its domestic operations since December 31, 2017.

We hadhave restricted cash of $6.3$0.1 million and $14.1$0.2 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively, primarily related to contractual obligations and activities of our captive insurance subsidiary. Given expiring policies under our captive insurance subsidiary were not renewed upon expiration in May 2017, we expect our restricted cash balances to decline over time. These restricted2019, respectively. Restricted cash amounts are not included in our balance of cash and cash equivalents. At bothequivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, although they are included in the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

2020 cash flows compared to 2019

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $348.4 million for 2020 compared to $60.9 million in 2019. The increase of $287.5 million was primarily a result of a $130.6 million decrease in cash used for accounts payable and accrued expenses, an $87.9 million increase in net income, an $85.8 million increase in cash provided by accounts receivable, a $61.3 million increase in long-term liabilities, an $11.8 million increase in deferred income taxes and a $10.5 million increase in intangible amortization, offset by a $38.5 million increase in the equity received for the income of our minority investee, a change of $41.1 million in accruals for income tax refunds associated with the sale of WD Services, a $9.6 million increase in cash used for accrued transportation costs and a $7.6 million decrease in provision for doubtful accounts.

Of the cash provided by operating activities, $173.9 million is related to a buildup of reconciliation contract payables that will be repaid to our customers in future periods. $101.7 million of this amount will be repaid at different times throughout 2021, and the remaining $72.2 million is due to be repaid in 2022.

Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $635.0 million in 2020 compared to $10.9 million in 2019. The increase of $646.3 million was primarily attributable to net cash outflow of $566.4 million for the acquisition of Simplura in November 2020 and $77.7 million for the acquisition of NMT in May 2020.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $408.3 million in 2020 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $0.8 million in 2019. The increase of $409.0 million was primarily the result of proceeds from the issuance of $500 million senior unsecured notes in November 2020 and $14.3 million of proceeds from common stock issued pursuant to stock option exercises, offset by $88.8 million of cash used in the redemption of preferred stock and $3.4 million used in the repurchase of company common stock.

We also had increased borrowings on our Credit Facility throughout 2020 that allowed us the temporary liquidity needed during the year to execute on our Preferred Share Conversion, acquisitions and stock buyback program. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020 we had no amountsborrowings on our Credit Facility.


58


2019 cash flows compared to 2018

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $60.9 million for 2019 compared to $7.9 million in 2018. The increase of $53.0 million was primarily a result of the receipt of $30.8 million in income tax refunds associated with the sale of WD Services during 2018, higher net income during the comparative periods, and changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by the timing of prepaid expenses.

Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities of $10.9 million in 2019 compared to $45.3 million in 2018. The decrease of $34.4 million was primarily attributable to $30.9 million net cash outflow for the acquisition of Circulation in 2018 and sale of WD Services, as well as a decrease in the purchase of property and equipment of $6.7 million due to discontinued operations.

Financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities of $0.8 million in 2019 decreased $50.8 million as compared to 2018 primarily as a result of lesser common stock repurchases.

Obligations and commitments
Credit Facility. On October 16, 2020, the Company entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Eighth Amendment”), which among other things, amended the Credit Facility to permit the incurrence of additional debt to finance the Simplura acquisition permit borrowing under the Credit Facility to partially fund the Simplura Acquisition with limited conditions to such borrowing, increase the top interest rate margin that may apply to loans thereunder, and revise our permitted ratio of EBITDA to indebtedness. In addition, the Eighth Amendment extended the maturity date to August 2, 2023.

Effective as of the Eighth Amendment, interest on the outstanding principal amount of loans under the Credit Facility accrues, at the Company’s election, at a per annum rate equal to the greater of either LIBOR or 1.00%, plus an applicable margin, or the base rate as defined in the agreement plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.50% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.50% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement that governs our Credit Facility. The commitment fee and letter of credit facility.fee ranges from 0.35% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.50%, respectively, in each case based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement that governs our Credit Facility.


We had no outstanding borrowings on our Credit Facility as of December 31, 2020.

Senior Unsecured Notes. On November 4, 2020, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% senior unsecured notes due on November 15, 2025 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated November 4, 2020 (the “Indenture”), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”).

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company's future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, are effectively subordinated to any of the Company's existing and future secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and are structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of each of the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The Company will pay interest on the Notes at 5.875% per annum until maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, with the first interest payment date being May 15th, 2021. Principal payments are not required until the maturity date on November 15, 2025 when 100% of the outstanding principal will be required to be repaid.

Preferred Stock. On June 8, 2020, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Conversion Agreement (the "Conversion Agreement") with the Coliseum Stockholders. Pursuant to the Conversion Agreement, the Company purchased 369,120 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, in exchange for $209.88 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock, plus a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through the day prior to June 11, 2020. Further, the Coliseum Stockholders converted 369,120 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 925,567 shares of common stock, a cash payment equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through June 11, 2020, and a cash payment of $8.82 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The amount of accrued dividends paid pursuant to the Conversion Agreement was equal to $0.8 million.

59


Further, on September 3, 2020, the Company elected to effect the conversion (the “Conversion”) of all of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. In accordance with the Conversion Agreement, as amended, immediately prior to the Conversion, the Company repurchased 27,509 shares of Series A Preferred Stock from the Coliseum Shareholders for a cash amount equal to $209.88 per share of Series A Preferred Stock and a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares through the day prior to the Conversion.

Cash dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were payable quarterly in arrears to the Preferred Shareholders on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and, if declared, began to accrue on the first day of the applicable dividend period. The Company had the option to pay dividends in kind, but never exercised such option while the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding. Convertible preferred stock dividends earned by the Coliseum Stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $2.0 million and $4.2 million respectively, including accrued dividends paid pursuant to the Conversion Agreement.

We may, from time to time, access capital markets to raise equity or debt financing for various business reasons, including acquisitions. We may also raise debt financing to fund future repurchases of our Common Stock.common stock. The timing, term, size, and pricing of any such financing will depend on investor interest and market conditions, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any such financing. Our current credit facility expiresfinancing on August 2, 2018. On November 2, 2017, the Company’s Board approved the extension of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. Through December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased 180,270 shares, for $10.5 million, and $59.1 million was available under the plan to repurchase shares. During the period January 1, 2018 to March 5, 2018, the Company repurchased an additional 527,825 shares for $33.3 million, and $25.8 million was available under the plan to repurchase shares.

The cash flow statement for all periods presented includes both continuing and discontinued operations. Discontinued operations includes the activity of our Human Services and HA Services segments. The loss from discontinued operations totaled $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, while income from discontinued operations totaled $108.8 million and $107.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For 2017, the loss from discontinued operations primarily related to the accrual of a contingent liability of $9.0 million related to the future settlement of indemnification claims associated with our former Human Services segment, partially offset by a related tax benefit. The significant income from discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to the gains on sale of our HA Services segment and Human Services segment, respectively. Significant non-cash items of our discontinued operations in 2016 and 2015 included $3.7 million and $5.7 million of depreciation expense, respectively, $17.5 million and $28.6 million of amortization expense, respectively, and $52.3 million and negative $5.0 million of deferred taxes, respectively. Our discontinued operations also purchased property and equipment totaling $9.2 million and $10.3 million during 2016 and 2015.

2017 cash flows compared to 2016

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $55.0 million for 2017, an increase of $13.3 million compared with 2016. 2017 and 2016 cash flow from operations was driven by net income of $53.8 million and $89.8 million, respectively, non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of negative $11.1 million and negative $32.9 million, respectively, and changes in working capital of $12.3 million and negative $15.2 million, respectively.

The change in non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the impact of:

the disposition of HA Services, resulting in decreased gain on sale of business, depreciation, amortization and deferred taxes in 2017 as compared to 2016;
the asset impairment charge incurred in 2016 of $21.0 million;
the impact on deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Act passed in 2017;
the gain on sale of Mission Providence of $12.4 million in 2017; and
the impact of the change in equity in net (gain) loss of investees, which was a gain of $12.1 million in 2017 as compared to a loss of $10.3 million in 2016.

The change in working capital was primarily driven by the following:


Accounts receivable generated a cash inflow in 2017 of $5.7 million as compared to an outflow of $19.3 million in 2016. The increase in cash inflow of $25.0 million was primarily attributable to NET Services due to the timing of collections as well as an outflow of $3.1 million of HA Services in 2016. These changes were partially offset by cash outflows in 2017 related to an increase in WD Services’ receivables in Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and the UK.
Prepaid expenses and other generated a cash inflow of $15.5 million in 2017, as compared to a cash outflow of $4.1 million in 2016. The increase in cash inflow of $19.5 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in other receivables related to amounts receivable from insurance carriers in respect to certain claims paid by the Company, but reimbursable from the respective insurance carrier, decreased receivables related to our captive insurance company insurance policy rewrite, decreased prepaid value added taxes in the UK, decreased prepayments in WD Services in relation to certain contracts and changes in income tax payments.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses generated a cash outflow of $9.1 million in 2017, as compared to a cash inflow of $33.4 million in 2016. The decrease in cash inflow of $42.4 million is due primarily to the impact of NET Services accrued contract payments of $21.5 million, as well as the disposition of HA Services, which generated a cash inflow of $10.6 million in 2016. Partially offsetting these impacts is the impact of the increase in the accrued settlement related to our former Human Services segment of $9.0 million during 2017 as compared to an increase of $6.0 million in 2016.
Accrued transportation costs of NET Services generated a cash inflow of $11.2 million in 2017, as compared to a cash inflow of $8.7 million in 2016. The increase in cash inflow of $2.6 million is due primarily to the timing of payments to NET Services transportation providers and increased volume.
Income taxes payable on sale of business for 2016 includes a cash outflow of $30.2 million related to the sale of our Human Services segment.

Investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities of $0.8 million in 2017 decreased by $323.1 million as compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to $371.6 million of proceeds on the Matrix Transaction recorded in 2016, which was partially offset by the impact of $15.6 million in proceeds from the sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence in 2017. Additionally in 2017, we made a cost method investment in Circulation, a technology-based service provider, for $3.0 million. There was also a decrease in funding of our equity investment in Mission Providence of $13.7 million and a decrease in the purchase of property and equipment of $21.3 million. 2016 included purchases of property and equipment of $9.2 million by our discontinued operations.

Financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities of $33.8 million in 2017 decreased $343.0 million as compared to 2016. During 2016, there was a net repayment of debt of $305.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of debt upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction. Additionally, during 2017, we repurchased $41.0 million less of our Common Stock than in 2016. In addition, there was a decrease in proceeds from Common Stock issued pursuant to stock option exercises of $2.2 million.

2016 cash flows compared to 2015

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $41.8 million for 2016, an increase of $25.7 million compared with 2015. 2016 and 2015 cash flow from operations was driven by net income of $89.8 million and $83.2 million, respectively, non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of negative $32.9 million and negative $1.2 million, respectively, and changes in working capital of negative $15.2 million and negative $65.9 million, respectively. The change in adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the impact of the disposition of HA Services in 2016 and Human Services in 2015, as well as, significant stock-based compensation in 2015 and an asset impairment charge in 2016. The change in working capital is primarily driven by the following:
Accounts receivable generated a cash outflow for 2016 of $19.3 million as compared to an outflow of $86.6 million for 2015. The decrease in cash outflow of $67.3 million was primarily attributable to timing of significant receivable collections of NET Services, increases in WD Services accounts receivable in 2015 related to additional revenue contracts in place during 2015 as compared to 2014, and a cash outflow related to Human Services in 2015.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses generated a cash inflow of $33.4 million in 2016, as compared to a cash outflow of $21.9 million in 2015. The increase in cash flow of $55.3 million was primarily attributable to our Human Services segment activity included in 2015, but not in 2016, due to the sale effective November 1, 2015, as well as a decreased change in accrued compensation between periods.
Deferred revenue generated a cash outflow of $4.0 million in 2016, as compared to a cash inflow of $19.0 million in 2015. The significant cash inflow in 2015 primarily related to WD Services in association with cash received in advance of services being rendered for two large contracts.


Income taxes payable on sale of business for 2016 includes a cash outflow of $30.2 million related to the sale of our Human Services segment.

Investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities of $323.9 million in 2016 increased by $180.6 million as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to $371.6 million of proceeds on the Matrix Transaction recorded in 2016, which was partially offset by the impact of $199.9 million in proceeds from the sale of our Human Services segment in 2015. There was also an increase in the purchase of property and equipment of $6.1 million from 2015 to 2016.

Financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities of $376.8 million in 2016 increased $142.7 million as compared to 2015. During 2016, there was a net repayment of debt of $305.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of debt upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction, compared to a net repayment of debt of $271.1 million in 2015 upon the sale of our Human Services segment. Additionally, during 2016, we repurchased $33.5 million more of our Common Stock than in 2015. 2015 includes $80.7 million received from the issuance of preferred stock as well as a contingent consideration payment of $7.5 million associated with our purchase of Ingeus UK Holdings Limited and its wholly and partly-owned subsidiaries and associates.

Obligations and commitments
CurrentCreditFacility
The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of $200.0 million, $25.0 million of which is available for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2017 we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility and seven letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $11.1 million outstanding. At December 31, 2017, our available credit under the Credit Facility was $188.9 million. The Credit Facility matures on August 2, 2018.

Under the Credit Agreement, we have an option to request an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility and/or the term loan facility from time to time (on substantially the same terms as apply to the existing facilities) in an aggregate amount of up to $75.0 million with either additional commitments from lenders under the Credit Agreement at such time or new commitments from financial institutions acceptable to the administrative agent in its reasonable discretion, so long as no defaultus or event of default exists at the time of any such increase. We may not be able to access additional funds under this increase option as no lender is obligated to participate in any such increase under the Credit Facility.all.
We may prepay any outstanding principal under the Credit Facility in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in connection with prepayments of London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, loans. The unutilized portion of the commitments under the Credit Facility may be irrevocably reduced or terminated by us at any time without penalty.
Interest on the outstanding principal amount of any loans accrues, at our election, at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR, plus an applicable margin or the base rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.25% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.25% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on our consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement. Interest on any loans is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the Credit Facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount available to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit. The commitment fee and letter of credit fee range from 0.25% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.25%, respectively, in each case, based on our consolidated leverage ratio.
The Credit Facility also requires us (subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) to prepay the outstanding loans in an aggregate amount equal to 100% of the net cash proceeds received from certain asset dispositions, debt issuances, insurance and casualty awards and other extraordinary receipts.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments, give guarantees, pay dividends, repurchase shares, sell assets, and merge and consolidate. We are subject to financial covenants, including consolidated net leverage and consolidated interest coverage covenants. The Company’s consolidated net leverage ratio may not be greater than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter and the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio may not be less than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2017.

Our obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of our present and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain domestic subsidiaries, which includes our insurance captive. Our obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of, the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our respective assets, other than our


equity investment in Matrix, including a pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of our domestic subsidiaries, excluding our insurance captive, and 65% of the issued and outstanding stock of our first tier foreign subsidiaries.
Credit Facility Background
On August 2, 2013, we entered into the Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers and other lenders party thereto. The Credit Agreement provided us with a senior secured credit facility, in aggregate principal amount of $225.0 million, comprised of a $60.0 million term loan facility and a $165.0 million revolving credit facility. The Credit Facility includes sublimits for swingline loans and letters of credit in amounts of up to $10.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. On August 2, 2013, we borrowed the entire amount available under the term loan facility and $16.0 million under our revolving credit facility and used the proceeds thereof to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness.
On May 28, 2014, we entered into the first amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided for, among other things, an increase in the aggregate amount of the Credit Facility from $165.0 million to $240.0 million and other modifications in connection with the consummation of the acquisition of Ingeus.
On October 23, 2014, we entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) to (i) add a new term loan tranche in aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0 million to partly finance the acquisition of Matrix and make certain other modifications in connection with the consummation of the acquisition of Matrix and (ii) add an excess cash flow mandatory prepayment provision.
On September 3, 2015, we entered into the Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the lenders under the Credit Agreement consented to Providence’s sale of the Human Services segment and certain other amendments to the terms of the Credit Agreement to reflect such consents.

On August 28, 2016, we entered into the Fourth Amendment and Consent (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement. In accordance with the Fourth Amendment, which provided for the lenders’ consent to the Matrix Transaction, a portion of the net cash proceeds received by the Company in connection with the Matrix Transaction were applied to the prepayment of outstanding term loans and revolving loans. Additionally, effective following the repayment of the outstanding term loans in full on October 20, 2016, the Fourth Amendment further (i) reduced the aggregate revolving commitments under the Credit Agreement to $200.0 million, (ii) amended the consolidated net leverage ratio covenant such that the Company’s consolidated net leverage ratio may not be greater than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter and (iii) replaced the existing consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenant with a covenant that the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio may not be less than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter.
Rights Offering

We completed a rights offering on February 5, 2015, allowing all of the Company’s existing common stockholders the non-transferrable right to purchase their pro rata share of $65.5 million of Preferred Stock at a price equal to $100.00 per share (the “Rights Offering”). The Preferred Stock was convertible into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price equal to $39.88, which was the closing price of our Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 22, 2014.
Stockholders exercised subscription rights to purchase 130,884 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Standby Purchase Agreement between Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC (collectively, the “Standby Purchasers”) and the Company, the remaining 524,116 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock was purchased by the Standby Purchasers at the $100.00 per share subscription price. The Standby Purchasers beneficially owned approximately 94% of our outstanding Preferred Stock after giving effect to the Rights Offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement. The Company received $65.5 million in aggregate gross proceeds from the consummation of the Rights Offering and Standby Purchase Agreement, which it used to repay the related party unsecured subordinated bridge note that was outstanding as of December 31, 2014.
Additionally, on March 12, 2015, the Standby Purchasers exercised their right to purchase an additional 150,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock at a $105 per share subscription price.
We may pay a noncumulative cash dividend on each share of convertible preferred stock, when, as and if declared by a committee of our Board, at the rate of 5.5% per annum on the liquidation preference then in effect. Following the issue date of the convertible preferred stock, on or before the third business day immediately preceding each fiscal quarter, we determine our


intention whether or not to pay a cash dividend with respect to that ensuing quarter and give notice of our intention to each holder of convertible preferred stock as soon as practicable thereafter.
In the event we do not declare and pay a cash dividend, the liquidation preference will be increased to an amount equal to the liquidation preference in effect at the start of the applicable dividend period, plus an amount equal to such then applicable liquidation preference multiplied by 8.5% per annum, computed on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual number of days elapsed from the start of the applicable dividend period to the applicable date of determination.
Cash dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and, if declared, will begin to accrue on the first day of the applicable dividend period. Payment in kind (“PIK”) dividends, if applicable, will accrue and be cumulative on the same schedule as set forth above for cash dividends and will also be compounded at the applicable annual rate on each applicable subsequent dividend date. PIK dividends are paid upon the occurrence of a liquidation event, conversion or redemption in accordance with the terms of the convertible preferred stock. Cash dividends were declared each quarter for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and totaled $4.4 million each year.

Reinsurance and Self-Funded Insurance Programs
 
Reinsurance
 
We historically reinsuredWith respect to the Company’s historical SPCIC captive insurance company, the Company utilizes a substantial portion of ourreport prepared by an independent actuary to estimate the gross expected losses related to historical automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs underliability reinsurance programs primarily through our wholly-owned captivepolicies, including the estimated losses in excess of SPCIC’s insurance subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company, or SPCIC.limits, which would be reimbursed to SPCIC to the extent such losses were incurred.  As of May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renew the expiring reinsurance policies. SPCIC will continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years.
At December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the cumulative reserveCompany had reserves of $6.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively, for expected losses since inception of these historicalthe automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance programs was $1.1 million, $0.7 million and $5.0 million, respectively. Based on an independent actuarial report, ourpolicies, net of expected receivables for losses related to workers’ compensation, automobile and general and professional liability in excess of our liability under our associatedSPCIC’s historical reinsurance programs atinsurance limits.  The gross reserve as of December 31, 2017 was $5.7 million. We recorded a corresponding receivable from third-party insurers2020 and liability at2019 of $8.0 million and $12.8 million, respectively, is classified as “Self-funded insurance programs" and “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.  The estimated amount to be reimbursed to SPCIC as of December 31, 2017 for these expected losses, which would be paid by third-party insurers to2020 and 2019 was $1.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively, and is classified as “Other receivables” and “Other assets” in the extent losses are incurred.consolidated balance sheets.

Further, we had restricted cash of $6.3$0.1 million and $14.1$0.2 million at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, respectively, which was primarily restricted to secure the reinsured claims losses under the historical automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance programs.


Health Insurance

We offerUnder our NET Services, U.S. based WD Services, and corporate employees an option to participate in self-funded health insurance programs. Additionally, we historically offered this option to our HA Servicesprogram and Human Services segments’ employees. During the year ended December 31, 2017, health claims were self-funded with a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third-party insurer, to limit theour maximum potential liability for individual claims generally is limited to $275,000$0.3 million per person, subject to an aggregating stop-loss limit of $400,000.$0.4 million. In addition, the program has a total stop-loss limit for total claims, in order to limit ourthe Company’s exposure to catastrophic claims.

Health insurance claims are paid as they are submitted With respect to this program, the plan administrator. We maintain accruals for claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to the plan administrator, and therefore, have not been paid. The incurred but not reported reserve is based on an established cap and current payment trends of health insurance claims. The liability for the self-funded health plan of $2.2 million and $3.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, was recorded in “Reinsurance liability and related reserve” in our consolidated balance sheets.

We charge our employees a portion of the costs of our self-funded group health insurance programs. We determine this charge at the beginning of each plan year based uponCompany considers historical and projected medical utilization data. Any difference between our projectionsdata when estimating its health insurance program liability and our actual experience is bornerelated expense. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, in reserves for its self-funded health insurance programs. The reserves are classified as “Self-funded insurance programs” in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company also utilizes analyses prepared by us, up to the stop-loss limit. We estimate potential obligationsthird-party administrators and independent actuaries for liabilities under this program to reserve what we believe to be a sufficient amount to cover liabilitieshealth insurance coverage costs, based on our past experience. Any significant increase inhistorical claims information, to determine the numberamount of claims or costs associated with claims made under this program above what we reserve could have a material adverse effectrequired reserves. For more information on our financial results.self-insurance program, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Reinsurance and Self-Insurance Liabilities above.



Contractual cash obligations.Obligations
 
The following is a summary of our future contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017:
2020 (in thousands):
 
60


 
At December 31, 2017
 
 
Less than
1-3
3-5
After 5
Contractual cash obligations (000's)
Total
1 Year
Years
Years
Years
Capital Leases
$2,984

$2,400
 $584
 $
 $
Interest (1)
467

467
 
 
 
Purchased services commitments (2)
8,448

2,966
 5,482
 
 
Guarantees (3)
43,287

42,768
 519
 
 
Letters of credit (3)
11,074

11,074
 
 
 
Operating Leases (4)
62,092

20,875
 23,114
 14,164
 3,939
Total
$128,352

$80,550

$29,699

$14,164

$3,939
 At December 31, 2020
  Less than1-33-5After 5
Total1 YearYearsYearsYears
Senior Unsecured Notes$500,000 $— $— $500,000 $— 
Interest (1)149,000 29,800 59,600 59,600 — 
Guarantees (2)44,520 44,520 — — — 
Operating leases (3)36,934 10,32314,8966,9784,737
Letters of credit (2)17,151 17,151 — — — 
Purchased services commitment (4)3,464 3,464 — — — 
Finance leases45 45 — — — 
Total$751,114 $105,303 $74,496 $566,578 $4,737 
 
(1)
(1)Future interest payments have been calculated at the current rates as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Our purchase obligations represent the minimum obligations we have under agreements with certain of our vendors. These minimum obligations are less than our projected use for those periods. Payments may be more than the minimum obligations based on actual use.
(3)Guarantees and letters of credit (“LOCs”) are commitments that represent funding responsibilities that may require our performance in the event of third-party demands or contingent events. Guarantees include surety bonds we provide to certain customers to protect against potential non-delivery of our non-emergency transportation services. Of the outstanding balance of our stand-by LOCs, $11.1 million directly reduces the amount available to us from our Credit Facility. The surety bonds and LOC amounts in the above table represent the amount of commitment expiration per period.
(4)The operating leases are for office space and related office equipment. We account for these leases on a monthly basis. Certain leases contain periodic rent escalation adjustments and renewal options.

Other than the items described above, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017.2020.

(2)Letters of credit (“LOCs”) are guarantees of potential payments to third parties under certain conditions. Guarantees include surety bonds we provide to certain customers to protect against potential non-delivery of our non-emergency transportation services. Our LOCs are provided by our Credit Facility and reduce our availability under this agreement. The surety bonds and LOC amounts in the above table represent the amount of commitment expiration per period.
(3)The operating leases are for office space and related office equipment. Certain leases contain periodic rent escalation adjustments and renewal options.
(4)The purchased service commitment includes the maximum penalty we would incur if we do not meet our minimum volume commitment over the remaining term of the agreement under certain contracts.

In August 2020, the Company entered into an 11-1/2 year operating lease agreement for new corporate office space in Denver,     Colorado. The lease is expected to commence when construction of the asset is completed in the second quarter of 2021. Total estimated base rent payments over the life of the lease are approximately $29.7 million.

Stock repurchase programs
 
On November 4, 2015,Pursuant to previously announced stock repurchase programs, authorized by our Board authorized us to engage inof Directors we purchased a repurchase program to repurchase up to $70.0total of 0.8 million inshares, or approximately an aggregate valueof $55.8 million, of our Common Stockcommon stock during the twelve-month period following November 4, 2015. This plan terminated on November 3, 2016. A total of 1,360,249 shares were purchased through this plan for $63.0 million, excluding commission payments.
On October 26, 2016, our Board authorized us to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million in aggregate value of our Common Stock during the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. As of October 26, 2017, we spent $30.4 million, excluding commission payments, to purchase 770,808 shares of our Common Stock under this plan.

On November 2, 2017, the Board approved the extension of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock throughyear ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, 180,270 shares were purchased under this plan for $10.5 million, excluding commission payments, after it was extended on November 2, 2017. In addition, during the period January 1, 2018 to March 5, 2018, the Company repurchased an additional 527,825 shares for $33.3 million, and $25.8 million was available under the plan to repurchase shares.

Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time-to-time through a combination of open market repurchases (including Rule 10b5-1 trading plans), privately negotiated transactions, and accelerated share repurchase transactions at the discretionand other derivative transactions. Furthermore, pursuant to subsequent previously announced stock repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors, we purchased a total of 0.2 million and 0.1 million shares of our officers,common stock, for approximately $10.2 million and as permitted by securities laws, covenants under existing bank agreements,$6.0 million, during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, through a combination of open market repurchases (including Rule 10b5-1 trading plans), privately negotiated transactions, accelerated share repurchase transactions and other legal requirements.derivative transactions. All of the Company’s stock repurchase programs have since expired.




Off-balance sheet arrangements
 
As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have beenwere established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
The new accounting pronouncements that impact our business are included in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements and are incorporated herein by reference.

In August 2020, the SEC issued final rules 33-10825 and 34-89670 “Modernization of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105,” which amend the disclosure requirements in Item 101, Description of Business; Item 103, Legal Proceedings; and Item 105, Risk Factors of Regulation S-K. Consistent with the SEC’s ongoing efforts to modernize Regulation S-K disclosure requirements, the amendments aim to improve the readability of disclosures, reduce repetition, and eliminate immaterial information. Amendments to disclosure requirements include changes to the description of business and risk factors to a principles-based approach, providing more flexibility to tailor disclosures, while disclosure amendments to legal proceedings
61


continue to reflect the current, more prescriptive approach. The final rules are effective for all registration statements, annual reports and quarterly reports filed on or after November 9, 2020. The Company has reflected the changes throughout this Annual Report.

In November 2020, the SEC issued final rules 33-10890 and 34-90459 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data, and Supplementary Financial Information,” which modernizes and simplifies certain disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K. Certain key rule amendments eliminate the requirement to disclose Selected Financial Data; Selected Quarterly Financial Data, with certain exceptions; the impact of inflation and changing prices, provided the impact is not material; off-balance sheet arrangements in tabular form; and the aggregate amount of contractual obligations in tabular form. The final rules also amended various aspects of Item 303, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” among others. The final rules are effective for all registration statements, annual reports and quarterly reports filed on or after August 9, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the disclosure changes in its Annual Report.
  
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 
Foreign currency
Interest rate risk
 
As ofWe have exposure to interest rate risk mainly related to our Credit Facility, which has variable interest rates that may increase. We did not have any amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility at December 31, 2017, we conducted business in 10 countries outside the U.S. As such, our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not currently hedge against the possible impact of currency fluctuations. For 2017, we generated $288.5 million of our net operating revenues from operations outside the U.S.2020.

A 10% reduction in the foreign currency exchange rate from British Pounds to U.S. dollars would have a $18.8 million negative impact on consolidated revenue, and a negligible impact on net income. A 10% reduction in other foreign currency exchange rates would not have a significant impact on our financial results.

We assess the significance of foreign currency risk on a periodic basis and may implement strategies to manage such risk as we deem appropriate.

62




Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 




63


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
  
 
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the registrant, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. We designed our internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The Company conducts periodic evaluations of its internal controls to enhance, where necessary, its procedures and controls.

We acquired Simplura Health Group (“Simplura”) on November 18, 2020, and we excluded from the assessment of effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, Simplura’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $120.6 million (excluding intangibles and goodwill brought on through the transaction) and total revenues of $54.0 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.

We are currently integrating this acquisition into our internal control over financial reporting processes. In executing this integration, we are analyzing, evaluating and, where necessary, making changes in controls and procedures related to this acquisition, which we expect to be completed in fiscal year 2021. We have excluded this acquisition from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, as permitted by the guidance provided by the staff of the SEC. Other than the changes described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control–Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, the Company concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
 
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which is presented in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






64


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 




To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
The Providence Service Corporation:ModivCare Inc.:


Opinion on theConsolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ModivCare Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly The Providence Service Corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company”)the Company) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes, and financial statement schedule II (collectively,(collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 9, 2018February 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


We did not audit the financial statements of Mercury Parent, LLC (a 46.643.6 percent owned investee company) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.. The Company’s investment in Mercury Parent, LLC atwas $137,466 and $130,869 thousand as of December 31, 2017 was $169.7 million,2020 and 2019, respectively, and its equity in net gainearnings (loss) of Mercury Parent, LLC was $13.4 million$8,860, $(29,685), and $(6,158) thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017.years 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The financial statements of Mercury Parent, LLC were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Mercury Parent, LLC, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.


Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Evaluation of accrued transportation costs

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company estimates an accrual for transportation costs that have been incurred but not invoiced by the transportation providers. This accrual is included within accrued transportation costs of $79,674 thousand as of December 31, 2020.
65


We identified the evaluation of estimated accrued transportation costs as a critical audit matter. There was especially subjective auditor judgment due to the inherent estimation uncertainty in transportation costs that were incurred but had yet to be invoiced by the transportation provider. Specifically, trip cancellations and actual trip mileage could differ from the amounts estimated.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s accrued transportation cost estimate, including controls related to estimated trip cancellations and mileage. In addition, we compared the Company’s historical accrued transportation costs estimates to actual amounts paid to assess the Company’s ability to estimate accrued transportation costs. We compared a listing of amounts invoiced by transportation providers subsequent to year-end to the Company’s year-end estimate of amounts expected to be invoiced by transportation providers.

Fair value of payor network acquired in a business combination

As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired Simplura Health Group (“Simplura”) in 2020 for net consideration of $545,210 thousand. The Company preliminarily allocated $221,000 thousand of the consideration to the fair value of the acquired payor network intangible asset utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, a form of the income approach.

We identified the evaluation of the fair value of the payor network intangible asset in the Simplura acquisition as a critical audit matter. The evaluation of the estimated fair value of the payor network required a high level of auditor judgment. Specifically, the revenue growth rate, attrition rate, and discount rate assumptions used to determine the fair value of the acquired payor network required challenging auditor judgment as minor changes to those assumptions could have had a significant effect on the Company’s estimate of fair value.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s business combination process, including controls related to the revenue growth rate, attrition rate, and discount rate assumptions used to determine the estimated fair value of the payor network. We evaluated the forecasted revenue growth rate by comparing the assumption to forecasted growth rates in industry reports and peer companies’ analyst reports, along with actual historical results of Simplura. We compared the attrition rate to industry data and compared the discount rate to the projected internal rate of return for the transaction. In addition, we involved valuation professionals with specialized skill and knowledge, who evaluated the discount rate by comparing it against a discount rate range that was independently developed using publicly available market data for comparable entities.

/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Stamford, ConnecticutAtlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2018February 26, 2021




66


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
The Providence Service Corporation:ModivCare Inc.:


Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited ModivCare Inc. (formerly The Providence Service CorporationCorporation) and subsidiaries’subsidiaries' (the “Company”)Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule II (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated March 9, 2018February 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


The Company acquired Simplura Health Group during 2020, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, Simplura Health Group’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $120.6 million (excluding intangibles and goodwill brought on through the transaction) and total revenues of $54.0 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Simplura Health Group.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

67



/s/ KPMG LLP


Stamford, ConnecticutAtlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2018

February 26, 2021


The Providence Service Corporation
68


ModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share and per share data) 
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$95,310
 $72,262
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,762 in 2017 and $5,901 in 2016158,926
 162,115
Other receivables5,759
 12,639
Prepaid expenses and other35,243
 37,895
Restricted cash1,091
 3,192
Total current assets296,329
 288,103
Property and equipment, net50,377
 46,220
Goodwill121,668
 119,624
Intangible assets, net43,939
 49,124
Equity investments169,912
 161,363
Other assets12,028
 8,397
Restricted cash, less current portion5,205
 10,938
Deferred tax asset4,632
 1,510
Total assets$704,090
 $685,279
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity   
Current liabilities:   
Current portion of long-term obligations$2,400
 $1,721
Accounts payable15,404
 22,177
Accrued expenses103,838
 102,381
Accrued transportation costs83,588
 72,356
Deferred revenue17,381
 20,522
Reinsurance and related liability reserves4,319
 8,639
Total current liabilities226,930
 227,796
Long-term obligations, less current portion584
 1,890
Other long-term liabilities21,386
 22,380
Deferred tax liabilities41,627
 57,973
Total liabilities290,527
 310,039
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock   
Convertible preferred stock, net: Authorized 10,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 803,200 and 803,398 issued and outstanding; 5.5%/8.5% dividend rate77,546
 77,565
Stockholders' equity   
Common stock: Authorized 40,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 17,473,598 and 17,315,661 issued and outstanding (including treasury shares)17
 17
Additional paid-in capital313,955
 302,010
Retained earnings204,818
 156,718
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(25,805) (33,449)
Treasury shares, at cost, 4,126,132 and 3,478,676 shares(154,803) (125,201)
Total Providence stockholders' equity338,182
 300,095
Noncontrolling interest(2,165) (2,420)
Total stockholders' equity336,017
 297,675
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity$704,090
 $685,279



 December 31,
 20202019
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$183,281 $61,365 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,403 in 2020 and $5,933 in 2019197,943 180,416 
Other receivables12,674 3,396 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets31,885 10,942 
Restricted cash75 153 
Current assets of discontinued operations758 155 
Total current assets426,616 256,427 
Operating lease right-of-use assets30,928 20,095 
Property and equipment, net27,544 23,243 
Goodwill444,927 135,216 
Intangible assets, net345,652 19,911 
Equity investment137,466 130,869 
Other assets12,780 11,620 
Total assets$1,425,913 $597,381 
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity  
Current liabilities:  
Current portion of long-term obligations$45 $308 
Accounts payable8,464 9,805 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities8,277 6,730 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities218,671 38,733 
Accrued transportation costs79,674 87,063 
Deferred revenue2,923 227 
Self-funded insurance programs4,727 5,890 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations1,971 1,430 
Total current liabilities324,752 150,186 
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing costs of $14.0 million485,980 
Operating lease liabilities, less current portion23,437 14,502 
Other long-term liabilities87,939 15,074 
Deferred tax liabilities92,195 22,907 
Total liabilities1,014,303 202,669 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 22)00
Redeemable convertible preferred stock  
Convertible preferred stock, net: Authorized 10,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 0 and 798,788 issued and outstanding; 5.5%/8.5% dividend rate77,120 
Stockholders’ equity  
Common stock: Authorized 40,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 19,570,598 and 18,073,763 issued and outstanding (including treasury shares)19 18 
Additional paid-in capital421,318 351,529 
Retained earnings218,414 183,733 
Treasury shares, at cost, 5,287,283 and 5,088,782 shares, respectively(228,141)(217,688)
Total stockholders’ equity411,610 317,592 
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity$1,425,913 $597,381 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

69



The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations
(in thousands except share and per share data)
 
Year ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015
����202020192018
     
Service revenue, net$1,623,882
 $1,578,245
 $1,478,010
Service revenue, net$1,368,675 $1,509,944 $1,384,965 
     
Operating expenses:     Operating expenses:   
Service expense1,489,044
 1,452,110
 1,381,154
Service expense1,078,795 1,401,152 1,253,608 
General and administrative expense72,336
 69,911
 70,986
General and administrative expense140,539 67,244 77,093 
Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 
Asset impairment charge14,175 
Depreciation and amortization26,469
 26,604
 23,998
Depreciation and amortization26,183 16,816 15,813 
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 1,569,628
 1,476,138
Total operating expenses1,245,517 1,485,212 1,360,689 
Operating income36,033
 8,617
 1,872
Operating income123,158 24,732 24,276 
     
Other expenses:     
Other expenses (income):Other expenses (income):   
Interest expense, net1,278
 1,583
 1,853
Interest expense, net17,599 850 1,783 
Other income(5,363) 
 
Other income(277)
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) 
 
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
 (1,375) (857)
Equity in net (income) loss of investeeEquity in net (income) loss of investee(8,860)29,685 6,158 
Gain on remeasurement of cost method investmentGain on remeasurement of cost method investment(6,577)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes64,204
 (1,878) (10,094)Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes114,419 (5,526)22,912 
Provision for income taxes4,401
 17,036
 14,583
Provision (benefit) for income taxesProvision (benefit) for income taxes24,805 (573)4,684 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax59,803
 (18,914) (24,677)Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax89,614 (4,953)18,228 
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) 108,760
 107,871
Net income53,820
 89,846
 83,194
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(451) 2,082
 502
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(778)5,919 (37,053)
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)88,836 966 (18,825)
Net loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interestNet loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest(156)
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCareNet income (loss) attributable to ModivCare$88,836 $966 $(18,981)
     
Net income available to common stockholders (Note 14)$41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (Note 18)Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (Note 18)$32,471 $(3,437)$(25,257)
     
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:     Basic earnings (loss) per common share:   
Continuing operations$3.52
 $(1.45) $(1.83)Continuing operations$2.45 $(0.72)$0.92 
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Discontinued operations(0.06)0.46 (2.87)
Basic earnings per common share$3.08
 $5.07
 $4.26
Basic earnings (loss) per common shareBasic earnings (loss) per common share$2.39 $(0.26)$(1.95)
     
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:     Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:   
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83)Continuing operations$2.43 $(0.72)$0.92 
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Discontinued operations(0.06)0.46 (2.86)
Diluted earnings per common share$3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
Diluted earnings (loss) per common shareDiluted earnings (loss) per common share$2.37 $(0.26)$(1.94)
     
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:     Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:   
Basic13,602,140
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Basic13,567,323 12,958,713 12,960,837 
Diluted13,673,314
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Diluted13,683,308 12,958,713 13,033,247 
              


See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

70



The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in thousands)
 
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net income$53,820
 $89,846
 $83,194
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest(451) 2,082
 502
Net income attributable to Providence53,369
 91,928
 83,696
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax7,117
 (16,618) (8,075)
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of equity investment527
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)7,644
 (16,618) (8,075)
Comprehensive income61,464
 73,228
 75,119
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest(255) 1,968
 508
Comprehensive income attributable to Providence$61,209
 $75,196
 $75,627
 Year ended December 31,
 202020192018
Net income (loss)$88,836 $966 $(18,825)
Net loss from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interest(156)
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCare88,836 966 (18,981)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:   
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax(4,168)
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of subsidiary and equity investment, respectively29,973 
Other comprehensive income25,805 
Comprehensive income88,836 966 6,980 
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest(2,165)
Comprehensive income attributable to ModivCare$88,836 $966 $4,815 
 





































































See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

71




The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity 
(in thousands except share data)
Accumulated
Other
      Retained 
Accumulated
Other
        Common Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Retained
Comprehensive
Loss, Net of
Treasury Stock
Non-
Controlling
Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
 
Earnings
(Accumulated
 
Comprehensive
Loss, Net of
 Treasury Stock 
Non-
Controlling
   SharesAmountCapitalEarningsTaxSharesAmountInterestTotal
Shares Amount Capital Deficit) Tax Shares Amount Interest Total
Balance at December 31, 201416,870,285
 $17
 $261,155
 $(13,366) $(8,756) 1,014,108
 $(17,686) $50
 $221,414
Stock-based compensation
 
 26,622
 
 
 
 
 
 26,622
Exercise of employee stock options, including net tax benefit of $2,706247,333
 
 7,899
 
 
 5,718
 (299) 
 7,600
Restricted stock issued65,447
 
 
 
 
 15,961
 (759) 
 (759)
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 816,468
 (34,111) 
 (34,111)
Shares surrendered by employees to pay employee taxes related to shares released from escrow
 
 
 
 
 43,743
 (1,968) 
 (1,968)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock3,715
 
 150
 
 
 
 
 
 150
Beneficial conversion feature related to preferred stock
 
 1,071
 
 
 
 
 
 1,071
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 (2,814) (1,121) 
 
 
 
 (3,935)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock discount
 
 (1,071) 
 
 
 
 
 (1,071)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 (8,075) 
 
 
 (8,075)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (502) (502)
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 83,696
 
 
 
 
 83,696
Balance at December 31, 201517,186,780
 17
 293,012
 69,209
 (16,831) 1,895,998
 (54,823) (452) 290,132
Stock-based compensation
 
 5,154
 
 
 
 
 
 5,154
Exercise of employee stock options, including net tax benefit of $276105,788
 
 3,832
 
 
 
 
 
 3,832
Restricted stock issued22,793
 
 
 
 
 2,736
 (130) 
 (130)
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 1,579,942
 (70,248) 
 (70,248)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock300
 
 12
 
 
 
 
 
 12
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 
 (4,419) 
 
 
 
 (4,419)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 (16,618) 
 
 114
 (16,504)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,082) (2,082)
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 91,928
 
 
 
 
 91,928
Balance at December 31, 201617,315,661
 17
 302,010
 156,718
 (33,449) 3,478,676
 (125,201) (2,420) 297,675
Balance at December 31, 2017Balance at December 31, 201717,473,598 $17 $313,955 $204,818 $(25,805)4,126,132 $(154,803)$(2,165)$336,017 
Stock-based compensation
 
 7,619
 
 
 
 
 
 7,619
Stock-based compensation— — 9,130 — — — — — 9,130 
Exercise of employee stock options91,400
 
 2,423
 
 
 5,665
 (238) 
 2,185
Exercise of employee stock options266,293 11,669 — — — 11,670 
Restricted stock issued36,623
 
 
 
 
 19,556
 (878) 
 (878)Restricted stock issued33,582 — (320)— — 5,242 (335)— (655)
Performance restricted stock issued3,773
 
 (96) 
 
 
 
 
 (96)Performance restricted stock issued3,110 — (109)— — — (109)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends25,646
 
 1,107
 
 
 
 
 
 1,107
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends4,193 — 150 — — — — — 150 
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 622,235
 (28,486) 
 (28,486)
Stock repurchase planStock repurchase plan— — — — — 838,719 (55,753)— (55,753)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock495
 
 20
 (1) 
 
 
 
 19
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock3,993 — 161 (7)— — — — 154 
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 
 (4,418) 
 
 
 
 (4,418)Convertible preferred stock dividends— — — (4,413)— — — — (4,413)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 7,117
 
 
 (196) 6,921
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax— — — — (4,168)— — 1,839 (2,329)
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of equity investments
 
 
 
 527
 
 
 
 527
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of equity investments— — — — 29,973 — — — 29,973 
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 451
 451
Noncontrolling interests— — — — — — 326 326 
Other
 
 22
 
 
 
 
 
 22
Other— — 108 — — — — 108 
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 53,369
 
 
 
 
 53,369
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting principle
 
 850
 (850) 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 201717,473,598
 $17
 $313,955
 $204,818
 $(25,805) 4,126,132
 $(154,803) $(2,165) $336,017
Net loss attributable to ModivCareNet loss attributable to ModivCare— — — (18,981)— — — — (18,981)
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting principle, net of taxCumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting principle, net of tax— — 5,710 — — — — 5,710 
Balance at December 31, 2018Balance at December 31, 201817,784,769 18 334,744 187,127 4,970,093 (210,891)310,998 
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation— — 5,260 — — — — — 5,260 
Deferred stock units (DSUs)Deferred stock units (DSUs)4,803 156 156 
Exercise of employee stock optionsExercise of employee stock options219,054 10,986 — — — — — 10,986 
Restricted stock issuedRestricted stock issued55,530 — (43)— — 13,268 (809)— (852)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipendsShares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends2,542 — 154 — — — — — 154 
Stock repurchase planStock repurchase plan— — — — — 105,421 (5,988)— (5,988)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stockConversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock7,065 — 272 43 — — — — 315 
Convertible preferred stock dividendsConvertible preferred stock dividends— — — (4,403)— — — — (4,403)
Net income attributable to ModivCareNet income attributable to ModivCare— — — 966 — — — — 966 
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 201918,073,763 18 351,529 183,733 5,088,782 (217,688)317,592 
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation— — 3,776 — — — — — 3,776 
Exercise of employee stock optionsExercise of employee stock options372,478 25,413 — — — 25,413 
Restricted stock issuedRestricted stock issued108,907 — — — — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax paymentsRestricted stock surrendered for employee tax payments— — — 2,824 (267)— (267)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipendsShares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends7,044 — 154 — — — — — 154 
Stock repurchase planStock repurchase plan— — — — — 195,677 (10,186)— (10,186)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stockConversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock82,839 3,191 (5,995)— — — — (2,804)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock pursuant to Conversion AgreementConversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock pursuant to Conversion Agreement925,567 37,255 (46,172)— — — — (8,916)
Convertible preferred stock dividendsConvertible preferred stock dividends— — — (1,988)— — — — (1,988)
Net income attributable to ModivCareNet income attributable to ModivCare— — — 88,836 — — — — 88,836 
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 202019,570,598 $19 $421,318 $218,414 $5,287,283 $(228,141)$$411,610 
 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

72



The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating activities     
Net income$53,820
 $89,846
 $83,194
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation18,542
 21,699
 20,234
Amortization7,927
 26,026
 38,067
Provision for doubtful accounts1,372
 3,759
 2,539
Stock-based compensation7,543
 5,136
 26,622
Deferred income taxes(22,996) (14,130) (10)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount682
 1,754
 2,041
Write-off of deferred financing charges
 2,302
 
Gains on remeasurement of contingent consideration
 
 (2,469)
Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 1,593
Equity in net (gain) loss of investee(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) 
 
Gain on sale of business
 (167,895) (123,129)
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable on gain on sale of business
 58,492
 22,797
Other non-cash charges (credits)296
 (1,323) (419)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable5,715
 (19,332) (86,627)
Prepaid expenses and other15,457
 (4,058) 14,654
Reinsurance liability reserve(5,731) (4,110) (611)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(9,064) 33,365
 (21,900)
Income taxes payable on gain from sale of business
 (30,153) 
Accrued transportation costs11,232
 8,654
 9,045
Deferred revenue(4,691) (4,019) 19,043
Other long-term liabilities(629) 4,462
 463
Net cash provided by operating activities55,044
 41,765
 16,097
Investing activities     
Purchase of property and equipment(19,923) (41,216) (35,072)
Proceeds from sale of property
 1,039
 
Proceeds from sale of equity investment15,593
 
 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 
 (3,433)
Sale of business, net of cash sold
 371,580
 199,943
Purchase of equity investment
 (13,663) (16,072)
Purchase of cost method investments(3,000) 
 
Restricted cash for reinsured claims losses7,834
 5,926
 (2,058)
Other investing activities310
 239
 (18)
Net cash provided by investing activities814
 323,905
 143,290
Financing activities     
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
 
 80,667
Preferred stock dividends(4,418) (4,419) (3,928)
Repurchase of common stock, for treasury(29,364) (70,378) (36,838)
Proceeds from common stock issued pursuant to stock option exercise1,921
 4,108
 4,894
Proceeds from long-term debt
 52,500
 34,000
Repayment of long-term debt
 (357,450) (305,125)
Payment of contingent consideration
 
 (7,496)
Other financing activities(1,927) (1,182) (286)
Net cash used in financing activities(33,788) (376,821) (234,112)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash978
 (1,357) (911)
Net change in cash23,048
 (12,508) (75,636)
Cash at beginning of period72,262
 84,770
 160,406
Cash at end of period$95,310
 $72,262
 $84,770
 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


The Providence Service Corporation
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
(in thousands)

 Year ended December 31,
Supplemental cash flow information2017 2016 2015
      
Cash included in current assets of discontinued operations held for sale$
 $
 $5,014
Cash paid for interest$987
 $9,768
 $16,699
Cash paid for income taxes$18,128
 $55,827
 $21,555
Proceeds receivable from option exercise$562
 $
 $
Purchases of equipment in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$1,362
 $983
 $930
Accrued unfunded future equity investment capital contributions$
 $
 $4,654
Note receivable issued for sale of property$
 $3,130
 $
Purchase of equipment through capital lease obligation$1,474
 $4,547
 $
Acquisitions:     
Purchase price$
 $
 $
Less:     
Working capital adjustments to purchase price
 
 (3,433)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired$
 $
 $3,433






























��Year ended December 31,
 202020192018
Operating activities   
Net income (loss)$88,836 $966 $(18,825)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation9,488 10,582 18,769 
Amortization16,694 6,234 8,908 
Provision for doubtful accounts(3,530)4,078 6,062 
Stock-based compensation3,930 5,414 8,993 
Deferred income taxes11,919 71 (545)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount921 293 512 
Asset impairment charge23,378 
Equity in net (income) loss of investee(8,860)29,685 6,072 
Reduction of right of use assets9,238 10,133 
Loss on sale of business53,692 
Gain on remeasurement of cost method investment(6,577)
Deferred income taxes and income taxes receivable on sale of business(51,861)
Other non-cash credits(353)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:   
Accounts receivable and other receivables55,885 (29,928)(30,997)
Prepaid expenses and other(12,609)(9,502)14,253 
Self-funded insurance programs2,056 809 (2,743)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses126,415 (4,144)(21,799)
Income taxes from sale of business(10,273)30,822 
Accrued transportation costs(7,389)2,175 1,301 
Deferred revenue(176)(1,298)(1,975)
Other long-term liabilities65,890 4,550 1,634 
Net cash provided by operating activities348,435 60,940 7,899 
Investing activities   
Purchase of property and equipment(12,150)(10,858)(17,521)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(622,862)(43,711)
Dispositions or sale of business, net of cash sold12,780 
Proceeds from note receivable3,130 
Net cash used in investing activities(635,012)(10,858)(45,322)
Financing activities   
Proceeds from debt737,000 12,000 42,000 
Repayment of debt(237,000)(12,000)(42,000)
Preferred stock redemption payment(88,771)— 
Preferred stock dividends(1,987)(4,403)(4,413)
Repurchase of common stock, for treasury(10,186)(6,797)(56,088)
Proceeds from common stock issued pursuant to stock option exercise25,413 11,142 12,413 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax payment(267)
Other financing activities(15,942)(718)(3,467)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities408,260 (776)(51,555)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(261)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash121,683 49,306 (89,239)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period61,673 12,367 101,606 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$183,356 $61,673 $12,367 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

73




The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
(in thousands)

 Year ended December 31,
Supplemental cash flow information202020192018
Cash included in current assets of discontinued operations held for sale$302 $155 $2,321 
Cash paid for interest$2,192 $1,261 $1,162 
Cash paid (received) for income taxes$21,766 $(30,037)$12,054 
Purchase of equipment through capital lease obligation$$$724 
Acquisitions:   
Purchase price$644,044 $$54,700 
Less:   
Cash acquired(21,182)(1,302)
Restricted cash acquired(110)
Value of existing ownership in Circulation(9,577)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired$622,862 $$43,711 






























See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
74


ModivCare Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2017
(in thousands except share and per share data)2020
 
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
 
Description of Business


ModivCare Inc. (formerly The Providence Service Corporation (“we”Corporation), a technology-enabled, healthcare company with a purpose of making connections to care, is the “Company” or “Providence”) owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged in the provision of healthcare services in the United States and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which the Company holds interests comprise the following segments:

Non-Emergency Transportation Services (“NET Services”) – Nationwidenation’s largest manager of non-emergency medical transportation (“NET”)NEMT programs for state governments and managed care organizations.organizations, or MCOs, and is also a leading in-home personal care services provider in the 7 states where it provides those services. Its in-home personal care services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting, including senior citizens and disabled adults.
Workforce Development Services (“WD Services”) – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – MinorityModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, (“Matrix”),which operates under the Matrix Medical Network brand and which we refer to as “Matrix”.Matrix provides nationwide a nationwide providerbroad array of assessment and care management services that improve health outcomes for individuals and financial performance for health plans. Matrix maintains a national network of community-based clinicians who deliver in-home care optimization and management solutions, including comprehensive health assessments (“CHAs”), to memberson-site services, and a fleet of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018, Matrix acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments,clinics that provide community-based care with advanced diagnostic testing, capabilitiesand additionalenhanced care optimization services.

In addition to its segments’ operations, the Corporateoptions. Matrix also provides an employee health and Other segment includes the Company’s activities at its corporate officewellness solution that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategicis focused on improving employee health with worksite solutions that reinforce business resilience and corporate development functions and the results of the Company’s captive insurance company.

Discontinued Operations

During the periods presented, the Company completed the following transactions, which resulted in the presentation of the operations as Discontinued Operations. On November 1, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its Human Services segment. In addition to the results through the sale date, the Company has recorded additional expenses related to legal proceedings as described in Note 18, Commitment and Contingencies, related to an indemnified legal matter. On October 19, 2016, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners purchased a 53.2% equity interest in Matrix with Providence retaining a 46.8% equity interest (the “Matrix Transaction”). Prior to the closing of the Matrix Transaction, the financial results of Matrix were included in the Company’s Health Assessment Services (“HA Services”) segment.safe return-to-work outcomes.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The Company follows accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The FASB establishes accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. References to GAAP issued by the FASB in these footnotesnotes are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which serves as athe single source of authoritative non-SEC accounting and applicable reporting standards to be applied byfor non-governmental entities. All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.


The Company holds investments that are accountedaccounts for its investment in Matrix using the equity method. Themethod, as the Company does not control the decision-making process or business management practices of these affiliates.Matrix. While the Company has access to certain information and performs certain procedures to review the reasonableness of information, the Company relies on the management of these affiliatesMatrix to provide accurate financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company receives audit reports relating to such financial information from the significant affiliates’Matrix’s independent auditors on an annual basis. The Company is not aware of any errors in or possible misstatements of the financial information provided by its equity affiliatesMatrix that would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


Reclassifications
The Company has reclassified certain amounts relating to its prior period results to conform to its current period presentation. See Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements7, Equity Investment, for additional informationfurther information.

Discontinued Operations

During the periods presented, the Company completed the following transactions, which resulted in the presentation of the related operations as Discontinued Operations.

On December 21, 2018, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the operating subsidiaries of its WD Services segment to Advanced Personnel Management Global Pty Ltd of Australia (“APM”) and APM UK Holdings Limited, an affiliate of APM, with the exception of the segment’s employment services operations in Saudi Arabia (the “WD Services Sale”). The Company’s contractual counterparties in Saudi Arabia, including an entity owned by the Saudi Arabian government, assumed these operations beginning January 1, 2019; however, the Company continues to incur expenses to wind down its Saudi Arabian entity. Additionally, on other reclassifications.June 11, 2018, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to sell Ingeus France for a de minimis amount. The sale was effective on July 17, 2018, after court approval.


75


2. Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include The Providence Service Corporation,ModivCare Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and entities it controls, or in which it has a variable interest and is the primary beneficiary of expected cash profits or losses. The Company records its investments in entities that it does not control, but over which it has the ability to exercise significant influence, using the equity method. The Company has eliminated significant intercompany transactions and accounts.
 
Accounting Estimates
 
The Company uses estimates and assumptions in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amount of net income or loss during any period. The Company’s actual financial results could differ significantly from these estimates. The significant estimates underlying the Company’s consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful accounts; accrued transportation costs; accrued restructuring; income taxes; recoverability of current and long-lived assets, including equity method investments; intangible assets and goodwill; loss contingencies; accounting for business combinations, including amounts assigned to definite and indefinite lived intangibles and contingent consideration; loss reserves for reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs; and stock-based compensation.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. Investments in cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the federally insured limits.
 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $40,127 and $21,411, respectively, of cash was held in foreign countries. Such cash is generally used to fund foreign operations, although it may be used also to repay intercompany indebtedness or similar arrangements. As of December 31, 2017, cash held in foreign countries included approximately $15,593 of proceeds from the sale of the Company's joint venture Mission Providence Pty Ltd ("Mission Providence").

Restricted Cash
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $6,296 and $14,130, respectively, of restricted cash:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Collateral for letters of credit - Reinsured claims losses$
 $2,265
Escrow/Trust - Reinsured claims losses6,296
 11,865
Restricted cash for reinsured claims losses6,296
 14,130
Less current portion1,091
 3,192
Restricted cash, less current portion$5,205
 $10,938
Of the restricted cash amount at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

$0 and $2,265, respectively, served as collateral for irrevocable standby letters of credit to secure any reinsured claims losses under the Company’s reinsurance program;


the remaining $6,296 and $11,865, respectively, is primarily related to restricted cash held in trusts for reinsurance claims losses under the Company’s historical workers’ compensation, general and professional liability and auto liability reinsurance programs, as well as amounts restricted for withdrawal under our self-insured medical and benefits plans.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


The Company records accounts receivable amounts at the contractual amount, less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount it estimates to be sufficient to cover the risk that an account will not be collected. The Company regularly evaluates its accounts receivable,receivables, especially receivables that are past due, and reassesses its allowance for doubtful accounts based on identified customer collection issues. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation, the Company records a specific allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce its net recognized receivable to an amount the Company reasonably expects to collect. The Company also provides a general allowance, based upon historical experience. Under certain contracts of NET Services, final payment is based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost, and the final reconciliation may require a considerable period of time. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accounts receivable under these reconciliation contracts totaled $42,054 and $45,287, respectively. In addition, certain government entities which WD Services serves remit payment substantially beyond the payment terms. The Company monitors these amounts due to the aging of receivables, but generally believes the balances are collectible. However, factors within those government entities could change and there can be no assurance that such changes would not result in an inability to collect the receivables.


The Company’s provision for doubtful accountsbad debt expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $1,372, $2,892$0.6 million, $3.2 million and $1,369,$0.3 million, respectively.

Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business acquisitions in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, with assets and liabilities being recorded at their acquisition date fair value and goodwill being calculated as the purchase price in excess of the net identifiable assets. See Note 3, Acquisitions, for further discussion of the Company’s acquisitions.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or at fair value if the assets were initially recorded as the result of a business combination or if the asset was remeasured due to an impairment. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset.asset to the Company. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Gains and losses resulting from the disposition of an asset are reflected in operating expense.



76


Recoverability of Goodwill
 
In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) the loss or modification of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or (5) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price. We perform theour annual goodwill impairment test for all reporting units as of October 1.December 31.


First, we perform qualitative assessments for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment suggests that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value amount, then we perform a quantitative assessment and compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value.

We adopted ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) effective April 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step two of the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if we deem it necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test in an annual or interim period, we recognize an impairment charge equal to the excess, if any, of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
 
The Company estimates the fair value of the Company’sCompany's reporting units is estimated using either an income approach, a market valuation approach, a transaction valuation approach or a blended approach. The income approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of the cash flows the Company expects the reporting unit to generate in the future. Estimates included in the discounted cash flow model include the discount rate, which the Company determines based on adjusting an industry-wide weighted-average cost of capital for size, geography, and company specific risk factors, long-term rates of growth and profitability of the Company’s business, working capital effects and planned capital expenditures. The market approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit based on a comparison of the reporting unit to comparable publicly traded entities in similar lines of business. The transaction valuation approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit


based on a comparison of the reporting unit to publicly available transactional data involving both publicly traded and private entities in similar lines of business. The Company’s significant estimates in both the market and transaction approach include the selected similar companies with comparable business factors such as size, growth, profitability, risk and return on investment and the multiples the Company applies to revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.
 
As discussed in Note 6, Goodwill and Intangibles, the Company determined that goodwill was impaired for the WD Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the Company recorded an asset impairment charge related to its goodwill of $5,224. The Company did not record any impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded $1,593 of impairment charges related to its Human Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2015, which is included in "Discontinued operations, net of tax" in the consolidated statements of income.
Recoverability ofIntangible Assets Subject to Amortization and Other Long-Lived Assets
 
Intangible assets subject to amortization and other long-lived assets are carried at cost and are amortized or depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 53 to 15 years. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, the Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets or groups of assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset or group of assets is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or group of assets or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset or group of assets. The presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset or group of assets may be impaired. In those cases, the Company assesses the recoverability of an asset or group of assets by determining whether the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets over the remaining economic life of the asset or the primary asset in the group of assets. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset or group of assets is not recoverable, the Company estimates the fair value of the asset or group of assets using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows. If the fair value of those assets or groups of assets is less than carrying value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. As discussed in Note 6, Goodwill and Intangibles, the Company determined that the WD Services segment’s intangible assets and property and equipment were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the Company recorded asset impairment charges of $9,983 and $4,381 to property and equipment and customer relationship intangible assets, respectively. The Company did not record any impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015.


Accrued Transportation Costs
 
Eligible members of our customers schedule transportation through the Company’s central reservation system. NET ServicesThe Company generally contracts with third-party providers to provide the transportation. The cost of transportation is recorded in the month the services are rendered, based upon contractual rates and mileage estimates. Transportation providers provide invoices once the trip is completed. Any trips that have not been invoiced require an accrual, based upon the expected cost as well as an estimate for cancellations, as the Company is generally only obligated to pay the transportation provider for completed trips. These estimates are based upon the historical trend associated with each contract’s population and the transportation provider network servicing the program. There may be differences between actual invoiced amounts and estimated costs, and any resulting adjustments are included in expense. Accrued transportation costs were $83,588$79.7 million and $72,356$87.1 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
 

77


Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discounts
 
The Company capitalizes direct expenses incurred in connection with its credit facilities and other borrowings, and amortizes such expenses over the life of the respective credit facility or other borrowings. Fees charged by lenders on the revolving facility and all fees charged by third parties are recorded as deferred financing costs and fees charged by lenders on term loans are recorded as a debt discount. Deferred financing costs for the revolving loan, net of amortization, totaling $388 and $1,070$1.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively,2020 are included in “Prepaid expenses and other” and “Other assets”, respectively,on the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs for the revolving loan were an immaterial amount for the year ended December 31, 2019. Deferred financing costs for the $500.0 million senior unsecured notes of $14.0 million are netted against the carrying balance of the long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet as there were no borrowings outstanding under the Company’s credit facility.of December 31, 2020.
 
Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue whenas it is earned and realizable based on the following criteria: persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists,transfers control of promised services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.   


NET Services
Capitatedcontracts.to its customers. The majorityCompany generates all of NET Servicesits revenue is generated under capitatedfrom contracts with customers where the Company assumes the responsibility of meeting the covered transportation requirements of a specific geographic population based on per-member per-month fees for the number of members in the customer’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. In some capitated contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These partial payments may be due back to the customer, or additional payments may be due to the Company, after each reconciliation period, based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost compared to the prepayment made.
Fee for service contracts.  Revenues earned under fee for service (“FFS”) contracts are based upon contractually established billing rates. Revenues are recognized when the service is provided based upon contractual amounts.
Flat fee contracts. Revenues earned under flat fee contracts are recognized ratably over the covered service period based upon contractually established fees which do not fluctuate with any changes in the membership population who are eligible to receive the transportation services.
For most contracts, the Company arranges for transportation of members through its network of independent transportation providers, whereby it remits payment to the transportation providers. However, for certain contracts, the Company only provides administrative management services to support the customers’ efforts to serve its clients, and thecustomers. The amount of revenue recognized isreflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for these services. The Company satisfies substantially all of its performance obligations and recognizes revenue over time instead of at points in time.

The Company's service revenues consist primarily of capitated revenues, including revenues attributable to capitated contracts with health plans and, to a lesser extent, revenues based uponon a fee-for-service ("FFS") structure where revenue represents revenue earned under contracts in which we will collect a specified amount. See further information in Note 5, Revenue Recognition.

In May 2014, the management fee earned.FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 introduced FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), which replaced historical revenue recognition guidance and was intended to improve and converge with international standards the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of ASC 606 was that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASC 606 also required additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 allowed for adoption either on a full retrospective basis to each prior reporting period presented or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method for contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018.

WDServices
The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. These impacts were related to our WD Services revenues are primarily generated from providing workforce development and offender rehabilitation services, bothsegment, which has since met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations. Upon adoption of which include employment preparation and placement, apprenticeship and training, youth community service programs and certain health related services to clients on behalf of governmental and private entities. WhileASU 2014-09, the specific terms vary by contract and country, the Company often receives four types of revenue streams under contracts with government entities: referral/attachment fees, job placement/job outcome fees, sustainment fees and incentive fees. Referral/attachment fees are typically upfront payments that are payable when a client is referred by the contracting government entity or that client enters the program. Job placement fees are typically payable when a client is employed. Job outcome fees are typically payable when a client attains and holds employment for a specified minimum period of time. Sustainment fees are typically payable when clients maintain a job outcome past specified employment tenure milestones. Incentive fees are generally based upon a calculation that includes a variety of factors and inputs, such as average sustainment rates and client referral rates. Incentive fees vary greatly by contract.

Referral/attachment fee revenue is recognized ratably over the period of service, based upon an estimated period of time general services will be provided (i.e. the person is placed in a job or reaches the maximum time period for the program). The estimated period of time services will be rendered is based upon historical data. Job placement, job outcome and sustainment fee revenue is recognized when certain milestones are achieved, and amounts become billable. Incentive fee revenue is generally recognized when fixed and determinable, frequently at the endcumulative effect of the cumulative calculation period, unless contractual terms allow for earned payments on a fixed or ratable basis.
Revenue is also earned under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established atchanges made to the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. 

If the rate is adjusted but the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, or if the volume or types of referrals are lower than estimated, our profitability may be negatively impacted. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.
Deferred Revenue
At times we may receive funding for certain services in advance of services being rendered. These amounts are reflected in theCompany’s consolidated balance sheetssheet as “Deferred revenue” until the services are rendered.of January 1, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2017Adjustments due to ASU 2014-09Balance at January 1, 2018
Assets
Current assets of discontinued operations$104,024 $11,182 $115,206 
Liabilities
Current liabilities of discontinued operations61,643 5,442 67,085 
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations7,565 30 7,595 
Equity
Retained earnings, net of tax204,818 5,710 210,528 


78


Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company follows the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all share basedshare-based payments at fair value.




The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula. The fair value of non-vested restricted stock grantsawards or units is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense charged against income for stock options and stock grants is based on the grant-date fair value. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. The expense for stock-based compensation awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period.
The Company records restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that may be settled by the holder in cash, rather than shares, as a liability and remeasures these liabilities at fair value at the end of each reporting period. Upon settlement of these awards, the totalcumulative compensation expense recorded over the vesting period of the awards will equal the settlement amount, which is based on the Company’s stock price on the settlement date.
Performance-based RSUs vest upon achievement of certain company specific performance conditions. On the date of grant, the Company determines the fair value of the performance-based award using the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock at that time and it assesses whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. If assessed as probable, the Company records compensation expense for these awards over the requisite service period. At each reporting period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved and of the performance period required to achieve the targets requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, the cumulative effect on current and prior periods of those changes will be recorded in the period estimates are revised, or the change in estimate will be applied prospectively depending on whether the change affects the estimate of total compensation cost to be recognized or merely affects the period over which compensation cost is to be recognized. The ultimate number of shares issued and the related compensation expense recognized will be based on a comparison of the final performance metrics to the specified targets.
The Company calculates the fair value of market-based stock awards, including the Company’s 2015 Holding Company LTI Program (the “HoldCo LTIP”) awards, using the Monte-Carlo simulation valuation model. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. Compensation expense for market-based awards is recognized over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market conditions are expected to be achieved.
Income Taxes
 
Deferred income taxes are determined by the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC Topic 740 - IncomeTaxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including recent earnings experience by jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, and the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, as well as other relevant factors. The Company establishes a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The net amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets, net of the valuation allowance, is presented as noncurrent in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Due to inherent complexities arising from the nature of the Company’s businesses, future changes in income tax law or variances between the Company’s actual and anticipated operating results, the Company makes certain judgments and estimates. Therefore, actual income taxes could materially vary from these estimates.
 
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance which includes amounts for net operating lossescertain carryforwards and deferred tax credit carryforwards,assets, as more fully described in Note 17, 21, Income Taxes, for which the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating losscarryforwards and deferred tax credit carryforwardsassets will not be realized in the ordinary course of operations.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense.


The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process of evaluating recognition and measurement criteria. The first step assesses whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the tax authority, including resolution of any appeals or litigation, based on the technical merits of the position. If the tax position meets the more likely than not criteria, the portion of the tax benefit greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with the tax authority is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.


79


On December 22, 2017, the U.S. bill commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“("Tax Reform Act”Act") was enacted as more fully described inenacted. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was enacted. See Note 17, 21, Income Taxes.


Foreign Currency Translation
Local currencies generally are considered the functional currencies outside the U.S. Assets and liabilitiesTaxes, for operations in local-currency environments are translated at month-end exchange ratesa discussion of the period reported. Income and expense items are translated atimpact on the average exchange rate for each applicable month. Cumulative translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in stockholders’ equity within the consolidated balance sheets.Company from these acts.
 
Loss Reserves for Certain Reinsurance and Self-Funded Insurance Programs
 
The Company historically reinsured a substantial portion of its automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs under reinsurance programs primarily through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company (“SPCIC”), a licensed captive insurance company domiciled in the State of Arizona. As of May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renew the expiring reinsurance policies. SPCIC will continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years.


The Company utilizes a report prepared by an independent actuary to estimate the gross expected losses related to historical automobile, general and professional and workers’ compensation liability reinsurance policies, including the estimated losses in excess of SPCIC’s insurance limits, which would be reimbursed to SPCIC to the extent such losses were incurred.  As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had reserves of $6,699$6.3 million and $11,240,$4.3 million, respectively, for the automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance policies, net of expected receivables for losses in excess of SPCIC’s historical insurance limits.  The gross reserve as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 of $12,448$8.0 million and $16,505,$12.8 million, respectively, is classified as “Reinsurance liability reserves”“Self-funded insurance programs" and “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.  The estimated amount to be reimbursed to SPCIC as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $5,749$1.7 million and $5,265,$8.5 million, respectively, and is classified as “Other receivables” and “Other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
The Company also maintains a self-funded health insurance program with a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third-party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims generally to $275$0.3 million per person, subject to an aggregating stop-loss limit of $400.$0.4 million. In addition, the program has a total stop-loss limit for total claims, in order to limit the Company’s exposure to catastrophic claims. With respect to this program, the Company considers historical and projected medical utilization data when estimating its health insurance program liability and related expense. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had $2,229$2.0 million and $3,022,$1.9 million, respectively, in reservereserves for its self-funded health insurance programs. The reserves are classified as “Reinsurance and related liability reserves”“Self-funded insurance programs” in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
The Company utilizes analysisanalyses prepared by third-party administrators and independent actuaries based on historical claims information with respect to the general and professional liability coverage, workers’ compensation coverage, automobile liability, automobile physical damage, and health insurance coverage to determine the amount of required reserves.
 
The Company regularly analyzes its reserves for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to its reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs. The Company believes its reserves are adequate. However, significant judgment is involved in assessing these reserves, such as assessing historical paid claims, average lag times between the claims’ incurred date, reported dates and paid dates, and the frequency and severity of claims. There may be differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded reserves and any resulting adjustments are included in expense once a probable amount is known.
 
Restructuring, Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs
The Company has engaged in employee headcount optimization actions within the WD Services segment which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction. The Company accrues for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The amounts used in determining severance accruals are based on an estimate of the salaries and related benefit costs payable under existing plans, and are included in accrued expenses to the extent they have not been paid.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the noncontrolling holders’ percentage share of income or losses from a subsidiary in which the Company holds a majority, but less than 100%, ownership interest and the results of which are consolidated and included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has a 90% ownership in The Reducing Reoffending Partnership Limited, which commenced operations in 2015.  


Discontinued Operations
 
In determining whether a group of assets disposed (or to be disposed) of should be presented as a discontinued operation, the Company makes a determination of whether the criteria for held-for-sale classification is met and whether the disposition represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s operations and financial results. If these determinations can be made affirmatively, the results of operations of the group of assets being disposed of (as well as any gain or loss on the disposal transaction) are aggregated for separate presentation apart from continuing operating results of the Company in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 20, 24, Discontinued Operations, for a summary of discontinued operations.operations related to prior years.


Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
The Company computes basic earnings (loss) per share by taking net income (loss) attributable to the Company available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including restricted stock and stock held in escrow if such shares are participating securities. Diluted earnings per share includes the potential dilution that may occur from stock-based awards and other stock-based commitments using the treasury stock or
80


the as-if converted methods, as applicable. For additional information on how the Company computes earnings per share, see Note 14, 18, Earnings Per Share.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company discloses the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy using the following three categories:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company may be required to pay additional consideration in relation to certain acquisitions based on the achievement of certain earnings targets. Acquisition-related contingent consideration is initially measured and recorded at fair value as an element of consideration paid in connection with an acquisition with subsequent adjustments recognized in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income. The Company determines the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration, and any subsequent changes in fair value using a discounted probability-weighted approach. This approach takes into consideration Level 3 unobservable inputs including probability assessments of expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is expected to be settled and applies a discount factor that captures the uncertainties associated with the obligation. Changes in these unobservable inputs could significantly impact the fair value of the obligation recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
The Company adopted the following accounting pronouncements during the year ended December 31, 2017:2020: 


In November 2015,June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”("ASU") No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”), which changes how deferred taxes are classified on organizations’ balance sheets. The ASU eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. The amendments apply to all organizations that present a classified balance sheet. For public companies, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2015-17 retrospectively on January 1, 2017, which resulted in the reclassification of the December 31, 2016 deferred tax assets-current balance of $6,825 and non-current deferred tax assets of $2,493 to long-term deferred tax liabilities in the amount of $9,318.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”). ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. ASU 2016-07 instead specifies that the investor should add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and apply the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment became qualified for equity method accounting. ASU 2016-07 is effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016 and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2016-07 on January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 is intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification in the statement of cash flows. For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, and elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $850 to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017. Upon adoption, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to employee share-based payments are recognized through income tax expense prospectively.

The Company excluded the related tax benefits when applying the treasury stock method for computing diluted shares outstanding on a prospective basis resulting in a decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 4,642 shares for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The adoption of ASU 2016-09 subjects our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effects of stock award exercises and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on our income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon the fair value of the award at the grant date. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded excess tax deficiencies, net, of $3,604 as an increase to the provision for income taxes. This deficiency primarily related to the Company's Holdco LTIP. As further explained in Note 12, Stock-Based Compensation and Similar Arrangements, no shares were distributed under the Company’s HoldCo LTIP as the volume weighted average of Providence’s stock price over the 90-day trading period ended on December 31, 2017 did not exceed $56.79. As this market condition was not satisfied, a related tax deficiency was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 of $3,590.

The Company elected to apply the change in classification of cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits or deficiencies on a retrospective basis. This resulted in an increase in cash flows provided by operating activities of $282, offset by an increase of $282 in cash flows used in financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, and an increase in cash flows provided by operating activities of $2,857, offset by an increase of $2,857 in cash flows used in financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 requires that employee taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes be reported as financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows, which is how the Company has historically classified these amounts.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805):Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 on April 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic323) (“ASU 2017-03”). ASU 2017-03 expands required qualitative disclosures when registrants cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of an ASU will have on the financial statements. Such qualitative disclosures would include a comparison of the registrant’s new accounting policies, if determined, to current accounting policies, a description of the status of the registrant’s process to implement the new standard and a description of the significant implementation matters yet to be addressed by the registrant. The Company implemented ASU 2016-15 in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 resulting in enhanced qualitative disclosures regarding future adoption of new ASUs.



In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step two of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the impairment loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 on April 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
Recent accounting pronouncements that were not yet adopted by the Company through December 31, 2017 are as follows:
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 introduced FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), which will replace most currently applicable existing revenue recognition guidance and is intended to improve and converge with international standards the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASC 606 also requires additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 allows for adoption either on a full retrospective basis to each prior reporting period presented or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application, which is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.

The Company has substantially completed its adoption plan, under which it performed conceptual and detailed contract reviews to determine the impact of ASC 606 on its financial statements, internal controls and operational processes. The guidance in ASC 606 on the following topics was critical to the Company’s analysis:

the effect of specified clauses on the term of many of the Company’s contracts with customers;
the nature of the promises in many of the Company’s contracts with customers to perform integrated services over a period of time;
whether and how much variable consideration to include when determining the transaction prices for its contracts with customers;
whether any of the Company’s customer contracts require performance over a series of distinct service periods and the impact on determining and allocating the transaction price; and
the manner in which the Company will measure its progress towards fully satisfying its performance obligations, including a determination of whether the Company may be able to use certain practical expedients.

The impact of adoption on revenue for each segment is as follows:

NET Services For non-emergency transportation solutions, the Company will primarily use the right-to-invoice practical expedient to account for revenue when the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the entity’s performance completed to date. This is consistent with the Company’s current revenue recognition policy. The only impact identified for NET Services is the presentation of one contract on a net basis which is currently accounted for on a gross basis, as the Company does not control the service, as defined under the new standard.

WD Services – WD Services has a number of contracts which include variable consideration, whereby it earns revenues if certain contractually defined outcomes occur in the future. When the related performance obligations are satisfied over time, the Company will recognize revenue in the proportion that the outcome has been earned based on services provided. The amount of revenue is based upon the Company’s estimate of the final amount of outcome fees to be earned. The Company will evaluate probability using either the expected value method or the most likely amount method, as appropriate. At each reporting period, the Company will update its estimate of outcome fees, based upon actual results as well as refined estimates of future results, and will record an adjustment to revenue, based upon services performed to date. Under the new standard, the Company may recognize revenues for outcome fees earlier under the new standard, as revenue is currently recognized upon the final resolution of the contingency, i.e. the outcome is able to be invoiced. However, under certain contracts the Company receives up-front fees, which may be recognized over a longer period under the new standard as compared to current guidance. As of adoption, such impacts are not material to the consolidated financial statements.



The new standard will require the Company to recognize contract assets and liabilities on its balance sheet as appropriate. Additionally, the Company will be required to make additional disclosures about the nature of its contracts and the related performance obligations.

The Company is in its final stages of quantifying the financial impacts of the new guidance based on the contracts that exist at the date of adoption, as well as evaluating presentation of our revenues and required enhancements to disclosures. We have implemented both process and information systems changes to identify and assess contracts that are impacted by the new revenue recognition criteria and accumulate data to satisfy new disclosure requirements. As discussed above, we expect the new standard will have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements, other than increased disclosures, upon adoption. Changes to revenue recognition as a result of applying the new standard will largely arise from outcome fees as described above, as well as the timing of revenue recognition for up-front fees. The Company will use the modified retrospective adoption method, and plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 introduced FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842 (“ASC 842”), which will replace ASC 840, Leases. Under ASC 842, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. 

ASU 2016-02 is effective for publicly held entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach does not require transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company has not entered into significant lease agreements in which it is the lessor; however, the Company does have lease agreements in which it is the lessee. The Company is assessing the impact of applying ASC 842 to its lease agreements. It is in the process of developing an adoption plan, assembling a cross-functional project team and assessing the impacts of applying ASC 842 to the Company’s financial statements, information systems and internal controls. The assessment of applying ASU 2016-02 is ongoing and, therefore, the Company has not yet determined whether the impacts will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 will supersede or clarifysuperseded much of the existing guidance for reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 affectaffected loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balanceoff-balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has not evaluated the impact ofadopted ASU 2016-13 on itsJanuary 1, 2020. This guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.statements or disclosures nor is it expected to have a material impact in the future.


In August 2016,2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 230)820): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash PaymentsDisclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2016-15”2018-13”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect which removed, modified, and added additional disclosures related to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted.fair value measurements. The Company will adoptadopted ASU 2016-152018-13 on January 1, 2018. The adoption2020. This guidance did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements or disclosures nor is notit expected to have a significantmaterial impact onin the Company's consolidated financial statements.future.

In November 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract (“ASU 2016-18”2018-15”). ASU 2016-18 requires2018-15 aligned the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a statement of cash flows explainservice contract with the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cashrequirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period; however, any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. ASU 2016-18 must be adopted retrospectively.obtain internal-use software. The Company will adoptelected to apply the prospective transition approach and therefore applied the transition requirements to any eligible costs incurred after adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2016-152018-15 on January 1, 2018.2020. The adoption will impact the Company's consolidated statements of cash flow as the Company has restricted cash totaling $6,296 at December 31, 2017. Additionally,not incurred any material implementation costs associated with new service contracts since the Company will be required to make additional disclosures detailing the balance sheet line items that are included in the sumdate of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flow.adoption.


In May 2017,February 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation–Stock Compensation2020-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 718)326) and Leases (Topic 842):Scope of Modification Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting (“ Bulletin No. 119 and Update to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2017-09”2020-02"). ASU 2017-092020-02 provides interpretive guidance about which changeson methodologies and supporting documentation for measuring credit losses, with a focus on the documentation the SEC would normally expect registrants engaged in lending transactions to prepare and maintain to support estimates of current expected credit losses for loan transactions. The Company adopted ASU 2020-02 on February 6, 2020, as the ASU was effective upon issuance. This guidance did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements or disclosures nor is it expected to have a material impact in the future.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-03, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments ("ASU 2020-03") to make improvements to ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"). Public business entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer, excluding eligible smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC, should adopt ASU 2020-03 during 2020. The Company adopted ASU 2020-03 on April 1, 2020. This guidance did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements or disclosures nor is it expected to have a material impact in the future.

Recent accounting pronouncements that the Company has yet to adopt are as follows:

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"). The ASU removes certain exceptions to the terms of a share-based payment award


should be accounted for as a modification. A changegeneral principles in ASC 740, Income Taxes, and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to an award should be accounted for as a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions do not change, and the classification as an equity or liability instrument does not change. This guidanceimprove consistent application. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early2020, including interim periods within that fiscal year, with early adoption is permitted. The Company will adoptis currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, 2016-15 onbut does not expect a material impact to the financial statements upon adoption.

In January 1, 2018. The2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, Clarifying the Interactions Between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815 ("ASU 2020-01"), to clarify the interaction among the accounting standards for equity securities, equity method investments and certain derivatives. ASU 2020-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods therein. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, including adoption in interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
81


ASU 2017-09 is2020-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements or disclosures; however, does not expectedexpect the adoption to have a material impact.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting ("ASU 2020-04") which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. The relief granted in ASC 848, Reference Rate Reform ("ASC 848"), is applicable only to legacy contracts if the amendments made to the agreements are solely for reference rate reform activities. The provisions of ASC 848 must be applied for all transactions other than derivatives, which may be applied at a hedging relationship level. Entities may apply the provisions as of the beginning of the reporting period when the election is made (i.e. as early as the first quarter 2020). Unlike other topics, the provisions of this update are only available until December 31, 2022, when the reference rate replacement activity is expected to be completed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact ASU 2020-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements or disclosures; however, does not expect the adoption to have a material impact.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging— Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) ("ASU 2020-06") which addresses the complexity associated with applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The update limits the accounting models for convertible instruments resulting in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract. Specifically, ASU 2020-06 removes from GAAP the separation models for convertible debt with a cash conversion feature and convertible instruments with a beneficial conversion feature. As a result, after adopting the ASU’s guidance, entities will not separately present in equity an embedded conversion feature in such debt. ASU 2020-06 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods therein. The Company is currently evaluating the impact ASU 2020-06 will have on its consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
3. Acquisitions

Simplura Health Group

On November 18, 2020 the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Simplura Health Group (“Simplura”). Simplura was a nonpublic entity that specializes in home care services offering placements of personal care assistants, home health aides, and skilled nurses for senior citizens, disabled adults and other high-needs patients. Simplura operates from its headquarters in Valley Stream, New York, with approximately 57 branches across 7 states, including in several of the nation’s largest home care markets. The acquisition of Simplura adds a higher-margin business in non-medical personal care—a large, rapidly growing sector of healthcare that compliments the NEMT segment.

The stock transaction was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combination where a wholly-owned subsidiary of ModivCare Inc., acquired 100 percent of the voting stock of Simplura for $545.2 million which represents a purchase price of $566.4 million less $21.2 million of cash that was acquired.

The following is a preliminary estimate, as a result of certain items noted in the table below, of the allocation of the consideration transferred to acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities, net of cash acquired, as of the acquisition date of November 17, 2020 (in thousands):


82


Cash$21,182 
Accounts receivable (1)69,882 
Prepaid expenses and other (2)9,089 
Property and equipment (3)1,640 
Intangible assets (4)264,770 
Operating right of use asset (5)11,725 
Goodwill (6)309,711 
Other assets (7)4,561 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (8)(46,043)
Accrued expense (8)(2,564)
Deferred revenue (8)(2,871)
Deferred acquisition payments (9)(4,046)
Deferred acquisition note payable (8)(1,050)
Operating lease liabilities (5)(11,725)
Deferred tax liabilities (10)(57,883)
Total of assets acquired and liabilities assumed$566,378 


The acquisition method of accounting incorporates fair value measurements that can be highly subjective, and it is possible the application of reasonable judgment could develop different assumptions resulting in a range of alternative estimates using the same facts and circumstances. Upon finalization of the preliminary items noted below there may be related adjustments to goodwill and income taxes. All items are expected to be finalized by the second quarter of 2021.

(1) Management has valued accounts receivables based on the estimated future collectability of the receivables portfolio. This estimate is preliminary as the Company's evaluation of the collectability of receivables is ongoing.
(2) Given the short-term nature of the balance of prepaid expenses carrying value represents the fair value.
(3) The acquired property and equipment consists primarily of leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, and vehicles. The fair value of the property and equipment was determined based upon the best and highest use of the property with final values determined using cost and comparable sales methods.
(4) The allocation of consideration exchanged to intangible assets acquired is as follows (in thousands):


TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor networkAmortizable15 years$221,000 
Trademarks and trade namesAmortizable10 years43,000 
LicensesNot AmortizableIndefinite770 
$264,770 

The Company valued trademarks/names utilizing the relief of royalty method and payor network utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, a form of the income approach. These estimates are preliminary as the Company continues to evaluate inputs and assumptions used in arriving at the fair value of the intangible assets.

(5) The fair value of the operating lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset (current and long-term) was based on current market rates available to the Company. This assessment is preliminary as of the date of our filing and will be finalized with final purchase accounting.
(6) The acquisition preliminarily resulted in $309.7 million of goodwill as a result of expected synergies due to value-based care and solutions being provided to similar patient populations that partner with many of the same payor groups. None of the acquired goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
(7) Included in Other assets are indemnification guarantees with a value of $3.9 million, obtained in conjunction with the acquisition of Simplura to cover certain acquired liabilities totaling approximately $3.9 million.
(8) Accounts payable as well as certain other current and non-current assets and liabilities are stated at fair value as of the acquisition date.
83


(9) Deferred acquisition payments are associated with historical acquisitions by the Simplura Health Group.
(10) Net deferred tax liabilities represented the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and their tax bases. See Note 21, Income Taxes, for additional discussion of the Company’s combined income tax position subsequent to the acquisition.

Assuming Simplura had been acquired as of January 1, 2019, and the results of Simplura had been included in operations beginning on January 1, 2019, the following tables provide estimated unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands except earnings per share). The estimated pro forma net income adjusts for the effect of fair value adjustments related to the acquisition, transaction costs and other non-recurring costs directly attributable to the transaction and the impact of the additional debt to finance the acquisition.


Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Proforma:
Revenue$1,775,428 $1,977,156 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net59,384 (16,946)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share0.05 (1.65)


Estimated unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the acquisition been completed on the date indicated or the future operating results.

The supplemental proforma earnings were adjusted to exclude the impact of Simplura's historical interest expense of $23.5 million and $28.0 million for 2020 and 2019, respectively. Additionally the earnings were adjusted to remove the impact of the financing for the acquisition through $486.0 million of long-term debt incurred in the form of senior unsecured notes, net of $14.0 million deferred financing fees, and borrowing of $75.0 million under the existing credit agreement. These adjustments increase the earnings by $26.6 million and $35.0 million for 2020 and 2019, respectively. Acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and the Company recorded transaction costs that are expensed in selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2020 of approximately $10.5 million. Transaction expenses consisted of professional fees for advisory, consulting and underwriting services as well as other incremental costs directly related to the acquisition.

For the period subsequent to the acquisition date included in the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, Simplura had net revenue of $54.0 million and a net income of $1.4 million.


NMT

On May 6, 2020, ModivCare entered into an equity purchase agreement with the Seller and National MedTrans, LLC ("NMT"), acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock. NMT was acquired for total consideration of $80.0 million less certain adjustments, in an all cash transaction.

The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The Company incurred transaction costs for the acquisition of $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. These costs were capitalized as a component of the purchase price.

The consideration paid for the acquisition is as follows (in thousands):

Value
Consideration paid$80,000 
Transaction costs774 
Restricted cash received(3,109)
Net consideration$77,665 


84


Restricted cash acquired was related to a security reserve for a contract and is presented in other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. No liabilities were assumed.

The fair value allocation of the net consideration is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor relationshipsAmortizable6 years$75,514 
Trade names and trademarksAmortizable3 years2,151 
$77,665 


Circulation

During 2017, the Company made an equity investment in Circulation, which was accounted for as a cost method investment. On September 21, 2018, the Company, acquired all of the outstanding equity of Circulation, which offers a full suite of logistics solutions to manage non-emergency transportation across all areas of healthcare, powered by its HIPAA-compliant digital platform. Circulation enables administration of transportation benefits, proactively monitors for fraud, waste and abuse, and integrates all transportation capabilities (e.g. outsourced transportation, owned fleets, and other medical logistics services), while emphasizing patient convenience and satisfaction. Circulation’s proprietary platform simplifies ordering, improves reliability and efficiency, and reduces transportation spend. The Company believes the acquisition advances the Company's central mission of reducing transportation as a barrier to healthcare and will help deliver a differentiated user experience and provide a core technology and analytics platform that better positions the Company for growth.

The purchase price was comprised of cash consideration of $45.1 million paid to Circulation’s equity holders (including holders of vested Circulation stock options), other than ModivCare. Per the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “merger agreement”), dated as of September 14, 2018, by and among the Company, Catapult Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), Circulation and Fortis Advisors LLC, as the representative of Circulation’s equity holders, ModivCare assumed certain unvested Circulation stock options under similar terms and conditions to the existing option awards previously issued by Circulation. The merger agreement also required $1.0 million to be paid three years after the closing date of the transaction to each of the 2 co-founders of Circulation subject to their continued employment or provision of consulting services to the Company. This requirement was reduced in 2019 to one co-founder of Circulation as the other co-founder is no longer with the Company. The value of the options assumed and co-founder hold back is accounted for as compensation, over the relevant vesting period, as such amounts are tied to future service conditions.

The Company’s initial investment in Circulation was $3.0 million in July 2017 to acquire a minority interest. As a result of the transactions pursuant to the merger agreement, the fair value of this pre-acquisition interest increased to $9.6 million, and thus the Company recognized a gain of $6.6 million. This gain was recorded as “Gain on remeasurement of cost method investment” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company determined the fair value of its pre-acquisition equity interest by multiplying the number of shares it held in Circulation pre-acquisition by the per-share consideration validated by reference to the total merger consideration agreed to with other unrelated equity holders in Circulation.

The Company incurred acquisition and related costs for this acquisition of $1.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. These expenses were primarily included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The purchase price of Circulation was calculated as follows (in thousands):

Cash purchase of common stock$45,123 
ModivCare’s acquisition date fair value equity interest in Circulation9,577 
  Total consideration$54,700 

The table below presents Circulation’s net assets at the date of acquisition based upon the final estimate of respective fair values (in thousands):

85


Cash$1,302 
Accounts receivable996 
Other assets216 
Property and equipment49 
Intangibles15,700 
Goodwill40,001 
Deferred taxes, net(2,199)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1,244)
Deferred revenue(69)
Other non-current liabilities(52)
  Total of assets acquired and liabilities assumed$54,700 

NaN of the acquired goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

The fair value of intangible assets was as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Customer relationshipsAmortizable3 years$1,400 
Trademarks and trade namesAmortizable3 years200 
Developed technologyAmortizable5 years14,100 
$15,700 
The amounts of Circulation’s revenue and net income included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the unaudited pro forma revenue and net (loss) income attributable to ModivCare of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2017, were (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Actual Circulation:
Revenue$2,205 
Net loss$(2,108)
Year Ended December 31,
20182017
Pro forma:
Revenue$1,388,203 $1,319,195 
Net (loss) income attributable to ModivCare(21,541)49,097 
Diluted (loss) earnings per share$(2.11)$2.85 
The pro forma information above for the year ended December 31, 2018 included the elimination of acquisition related costs. Adjustments for all periods included expensing the incentive for 2 co-founders to be paid upon continuing employment, amortization expense based on the estimated fair value and useful lives of intangible assets and related tax effects. The pro forma financial statements.information was not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been affected on January 1, 2017.


86


4.    Segments
 
On November 18, 2020, the Company acquired Simplura Health Group, which operates as a home personal care service provider. As a result, at December 31, 2020, the Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews financial performance and allocates resources based on 3 segments as follows:
3.
NEMT - which operates primarily under the brands ModivCare Solutions, LLC, and Circulation, is the largest manager of NEMT programs for state governments and MCOs in the U.S and includes the Company’s activities for executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, certain strategic and development functions and the Company’s insurance captive.
Personal Care - which consists of Simplura Health Group, and provides non-medical home care to Medicaid patient populations, including seniors and disabled adults, in need of care monitoring and assistance performing activities of daily living.
Matrix Investment - which consists of a minority investment in Matrix, provides a broad array of assessment and care management services that improve health outcomes for individuals and financial performance for health plans. Matrix’s national network of community-based clinicians deliver in-home services while its fleet of mobile health clinics provide community-based care with advance diagnostic capabilities.

The following table sets forth certain financial information from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s business segments for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
 NEMTMatrix
Investment
Personal CareTotal
Service revenue, net$1,314,705 $$53,970 $1,368,675 
Service expense1,036,288 42,507 1,078,795 
General and administrative expense133,212 7,327 140,539 
Depreciation and amortization24,516 1,667 26,183 
Operating income$120,689 $$2,469 $123,158 
Equity in net (income) loss of investee$$(8,860)$$(8,860)
Equity investment$$137,466 $$137,466 
Goodwill$135,216 $$309,711 $444,927 
Total assets$594,952 $137,466 $693,495 $1,425,913 
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
 NEMTMatrix InvestmentTotal
Service revenue, net$1,509,944 $$1,509,944 
Service expense1,401,152 1,401,152 
General and administrative expense67,244 67,244 
Depreciation and amortization16,816 16,816 
Operating income$24,732 $$24,732 
Equity in net loss of investee$$29,685 $29,685 
Equity investment$$130,869 $130,869 
Goodwill$135,216 $$135,216 
Total assets$466,357 $130,869 $597,226 

87


 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 NEMTMatrix InvestmentTotal
Service revenue, net$1,384,965 $$1,384,965 
Service expense1,253,608 1,253,608 
General and administrative expense77,093 77,093 
Asset impairment charge14,175 14,175 
Depreciation and amortization15,813 15,813 
Operating income$24,276 $$24,276 
Equity in net income of investee$$6,158 $6,158 

5.    Revenue Recognition

Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue as it transfers control of promised services to its customers and generates all of its revenue from contracts with customers. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for these services. The Company satisfies substantially all of its performance obligations and recognizes revenue over time instead of at points in time.

Capitation structure

Under capitation, payors pay a fixed amount per enrolled member. For capitated contracts we assume the responsibility of meeting the covered healthcare related transportation requirements based on per-member per-month fees for the number of members in the customer’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. Under certain capitated contracts known as reconciliation contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These prepayments are periodically reconciled to actual utilization and costs and may result in refunds to the customer, or additional payments due from the customer. Other capitated contracts known as risk corridor contacts, allow for profit within a certain corridor and once we reach the maximum profit level we discontinue recognizing revenue and instead record a liability within the Reconciliation Contract Payable account, to return back to the customer upon reconciliation at a later date. Capitation rates are generally based on local costs and average utilization of services. Because Medicare pays capitation using a “risk adjustment model,” which compensates providers based on the health status (acuity) of each individual enrollee, providers with higher acuity enrollees receive more, and those with lower acuity enrollees receive less, capitation that can be allocated to service providers. Under the risk adjustment model, capitation is paid on an interim basis based on enrollee data submitted for the preceding year and is adjusted in subsequent periods after the final data is compiled.

Fee-for-service structure

Fee-for-service ("FFS") revenue represents revenue earned under contracts in which we bill and collect a specified amount for each services that we provide. FFS revenue is recognized in the period in which the services are rendered and is reduced by the estimated impact of contractual allowances and policy discounts in the case of third-party payors.

Customer Information

Of the NEMT Segment’s consolidated revenue, 9.5%, 12.7% and 12.6% was derived from one U.S. state Medicaid program for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s revenues are generated from domestic governmental agencies or entities that contract with governmental agencies.

Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table summarizes disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 by contract type (in thousands):

88


Year Ended December 31,
20202019
State Medicaid and Medicare agency contracts$670,082 $736,030 
Managed care organization contracts698,593 773,914 
  Total Service revenue, net$1,368,675 $1,509,944 
Capitated contracts$1,132,929 $1,277,241 
Non-capitated contracts235,746 232,703 
  Total Service revenue, net$1,368,675 $1,509,944 

The table above includes $54.0 million of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to the Personal Care Segment through the acquisition of Simplura. Simplura's revenue is non-capitated and approximately 40% is generated from state Medicaid and Medicare agency contracts, while the other 60% is generated from MCO and other private pay contracts.

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized a reduction of $2.1 million and an increase of $10.8 million, respectively, from contractual adjustments relating to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods to which the customer agreed.
Related Balance Sheet Accounts
The following table provides information about accounts receivable, net as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, inclusive of a reconciliation contract receivable, which is a receivable balance from reconciliation type contracts and risk corridor contracts (in thousands):
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Accounts receivable$164,622 $124,868 
Reconciliation contract receivable35,724 61,481 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(2,403)(5,933)
Accounts receivable, net$197,943 $180,416 

The following table provides information about other accounts included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets inclusive of a reconciliation contract payable, which is a payable balance from reconciliation type contracts and risk corridor contracts (in thousands):
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Reconciliation Contract Payable, included in accrued expenses
$101,705 $15,706 
Reconciliation Contract Payable, included in "other long-term liabilities"72,183 
Deferred revenue, current2,923 227 
Deferred revenue, long-term, included in other long-term liabilities
566 758 

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, $0.4 million and $0.5 million of deferred revenue, respectively, was recognized.
Practical Expedients, Exemptions and Other Matters
We do not incur significant sales commission expenses; however, those expenses that are incurred are expensed as incurred within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company generally expects the period of time from when it transfers a promised service to a customer and when the customer pays for the service to be one year or less, and thus we do not have a significant financing component within our contracts with customers.
89


We do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less; (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue at the amount to which we have the right to invoice for services performed; or (iii) contracts for which the variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation or to a wholly unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct good or service that forms part of a single performance obligation, and the terms of the variable consideration relate specifically to our efforts to transfer the distinct service or to a specific outcome from transferring the distinct service.

6.    Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets to the amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

December 31,
20202019
Cash and cash equivalents$183,281 $61,520 
Restricted cash, current75 153 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$183,356 $61,673 

Restricted cash primarily relates to amounts held in trusts for reinsurance claims losses under the Company’s insurance operation for historical workers’ compensation, general and professional liability and auto liability reinsurance programs, as well as amounts restricted for withdrawal under our self-insured medical and benefits plans.

7. Equity Investment
 
Matrix
 
Prior to the closingAs of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016, the financial results of Matrix were included in the Company’s HA Services segment. Subsequent to the closing of the Matrix Transaction,December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company owned a 46.8% noncontrolling interest in Matrix. As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned a 46.6%43.6% noncontrolling interest in Matrix. Pursuant to a Shareholder’s Agreement, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners hold rights necessary to control the fundamental operations of Matrix. The Company accounts for this investment in Matrix under the equity method of accounting and the Company’s share of Matrix’s income or losses are recorded as “Equity in net (gain)(income) loss of investees”investee” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Matrix recorded asset impairment charges of $55.1 million.


The carrying amount of the assets included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheetsheets and the maximum loss exposure related to the Company’s interest in Matrix as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 totaled $169,699$137.5 million and $157,202,$130.9 million, respectively.


Summary financial information for Matrix on a standalone basis is as follows:follows (in thousands): 
 
December 31,December 31,
2017 2016 20202019
Current assets$37,563
 $28,589
Current assets$143,110 $64,221 
Long-term assets597,613
 614,841
Long-term assets619,642 631,007 
Current liabilities27,718
 25,791
Current liabilities81,920 31,256 
Long-term liabilities240,513
 281,348
Long-term liabilities351,036 351,380 
 
 Year ended December 31, 2020Year ended December 31, 2019Year ended December 31, 2018
Revenue$414,622 $275,391 $282,067 
Operating income (loss)39,412 (61,000)(1,186)
Net income (loss)15,137 (69,353)(19,962)

90
 Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 
October 19, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Revenue$227,872
 $41,635
Operating income (loss)11,870
 (4,079)
Net income (loss)26,665
 (4,200)
Included in Matrix’s standalone net income of $26,665 for the year ended December 31, 2017 is depreciation and amortization of $33,512, transaction related expenses of $3,537, which includes $2,679 of transaction incentive compensation, equity compensation of $2,639, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $2,331, merger and acquisition due diligence related costs of $685, interest expense of $14,818 and an income tax benefit of $29,613. The income tax benefit primarily related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Act. Included in Matrix’s standalone net loss of $4,200 for the year ended December 31, 2016 is depreciation and amortization of $6,356, transaction related expenses of $6,367, which includes $4,033 of transaction incentive compensation, equity compensation of $407, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $396, interest expense of $2,949 and an income tax benefit of $2,828.

See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, for Matrix’s January 1, 2016 through October 19, 2016 results of operations, as well as the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Mission Providence
The Company entered into a joint venture agreement in November 2014 with Mission Australia ACN (“Mission Australia”) to form Mission Providence. Mission Providence delivers employment preparation and placement services in Australia. The


Company had a 60% ownership interest in Mission Providence, and had rights to 75% of Mission Providence’s distributions of cash or profit surplus twice per calendar year. The Company accounted for this investment under the equity method of accounting and the Company’s share of Mission Providence’s income or losses was recorded as “Equity in net (gain) loss of investees” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Cash contributions made to Mission Providence in exchange for its equity interests are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as “Purchase of equity investments”.

On September 29, 2017, the Company and Mission Australia completed the sale of 100% of the stock of Mission Providence pursuant to a share sale agreement. Upon the sale of Mission Providence, the Company received AUD 20,184, or $15,823 of proceeds, for its equity interest, net of transaction fees. Subsequently, a working capital adjustment was finalized in December 2017 resulting in the return of $229 of the proceeds. The related gain on sale of Mission Providence totaling $12,377 is recorded as “Gain on sale of equity investment” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The carrying amount of the assets included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet related to the Company’s interest in Mission Providence was $4,021 at December 31, 2016.

Summary financial information for Mission Providence on a standalone basis is as follows:


 December 31, 2016
Current assets$4,640
Long-term assets10,473
Current liabilities12,844
Long-term liabilities1,655
 Nine months ended September 30, 2017 Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
Revenue$30,125
 $36,546
Operating loss(1,765) (9,664)
Net loss(1,934) (8,843)
4.8.    Prepaid Expenses and Other
 
Prepaid expenses and other were comprised of the following:following (in thousands):
 
December 31, December 31,
2017 2016 20202019
Prepaid income taxes$1,106
 $1,467
Prepaid income taxes$14,633 $2,942 
Escrow funds10,000
 10,000
Prepaid insurance2,121
 3,153
Prepaid insurance7,577 1,317 
Prepaid taxes and licenses906
 3,570
Note receivable3,224
 3,130
Prepaid rent2,268
 2,013
Prepaid rent1,196 868 
Deposits held for leased premises and bonds2,849
 2,609
Other12,769
 11,953
Other8,479 5,815 
Total prepaid expenses and other$35,243
 $37,895
Total prepaid expenses and other$31,885 $10,942 
 
Escrow funds represent amounts related to indemnification claims from the sale of the Human Services segment, which was completed on November 1, 2015. The Company has accrued $15,000 as a contingent liability for the settlement of potential indemnification claims, which is included in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. The escrow funds will be used to satisfy a portion of this settlement. See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information.



5.9.    Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following:following (in thousands, except useful lives):
Estimated
Useful
December 31,
Estimated
Useful
 December 31, Life (years)20202019
SoftwareSoftware310$31,830 $27,339 
Computer and telecom equipmentComputer and telecom equipment3528,446 30,313 
Life (years) 2017 2016
Computer and telecom equipment3  5 $35,915
 $31,854
Software3  5 32,989
 26,883
Leasehold improvements
Shorter of 7 years or
lease term
 17,890
 16,720
Leasehold improvements
Shorter of 7 years or
lease term
8,419 8,290 
Furniture and fixtures5  10 6,416
 8,070
Automobiles  5   3,797
 3,597
Automobiles 5 4,846 3,931 
Construction and development in progress  N/A   13,384
 5,831
Construction and development in progress N/A 4,721 3,104 
Furniture and fixturesFurniture and fixtures5102,330 1,711 
      110,391
 92,955
   80,592 74,688 
Less accumulated depreciation      60,014
 46,735
Less accumulated depreciation   (53,048)(51,445)
Total property and equipment, net      $50,377
 $46,220
Total property and equipment, net   $27,544 $23,243 
  
Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $18,542, $18,038$9.5 million, $10.6 million and $14,488$12.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
 
TheFollowing the acquisition of Circulation, the Company solddetermined it would not continue the building and land that included holding company office space in Arizona effective December 31, 2016 resulting in an asset impairment chargedevelopment of $1,415 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $9,983 for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to its WD Services segment based on its review of the carrying value of long-lived assets. The impairment charges are reflected in “Asset impairment charge” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2016. See Note 6, Goodwill and Intangibles¸ for further discussion of the impairment charges incurred related to the WD Services segment during 2016. Construction in progress as of December 31, 2017 is primarily comprised of NET Services, which has incurred substantial software development costs for its LCAD NextGen technology system. Such amounts are expected to be placed into service during 2018.

6. Goodwill and Intangibles
Impairment
The Company did not record any impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed WD Services for impairment, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the United Kingdom (“UK”NextGen”) impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK; and a change in senior management at WD Services during the fourth quarter.. As a result, the Company performed a quantitative test comparing the fair value of the asset groupings comprising WD Services with the carrying amounts and recorded an asset impairment charge of $4,381 to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets, which is recorded in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. In addition, the Company reviewed the carrying value of goodwill of WD Services, noting the carrying value exceeded the fair value. Therefore, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities, on a fair value basis, with any excess representing the implied value of goodwill of the reporting unit. The fair value was determined using an income approach, which estimates the present value of future cash flows based on management’s forecast of revenue growth rates and operating margins, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Based on this analysis, the carrying value of goodwill of the WD Services reporting unit exceeded the implied fair value and the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $5,224, which is included$14.2 million in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The Company reviewed the carrying value of other long-lived assets and goodwill, and noted no indicators of impairmentoperations for NET Services or the Matrix Investment during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded $1,593 of impairment charges related to its Human Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2015, which is included in “Discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statements of income.2018.
91


10. Goodwill and Intangibles
 


Goodwill
 
There were no changes in goodwill from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Changes in goodwill were as follows:follows for the period from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
 
 
NET
Services
 
WD
Services
 
Consolidated
Total
Balances at December 31, 2015     
Goodwill$191,215
 $40,784
 $231,999
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (6,041) (102,041)
 95,215
 34,743
 129,958
      
Asset impairment charge
 (5,224) (5,224)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 (5,110) (5,110)
Balances at December 31, 2016     
Goodwill191,215
 35,674
 226,889
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (11,265) (107,265)
 95,215
 24,409
 119,624
      
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 2,044
 2,044
Balances at December 31, 2017     
Goodwill191,215
 37,718
 228,933
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (11,265) (107,265)
 $95,215
 $26,453
 $121,668
ModivCare
Balances at December 31, 2019
Goodwill$231,216 
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000)
135,216 
Acquisition of Simplura309,711 
Balances at December 31, 2020
Goodwill540,927 
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000)
$444,927 
 
The total amount of goodwill from continuing operations that was deductible for income tax purposes related to acquisitions as of December 31, 20172020 was $52.2 million.

Impairment

The Company did 0t record any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges for continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2016 was $4,222.2018.


Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets are comprised of acquired customer relationships, trademarks and trade names, and developed technology. Intangible assets consisted of the following:following (in thousands, except estimated useful lives):
 
   December 31,
   2017 2016
 
Estimated
Useful
Life (Yrs)
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Customer relationships15 $48,128
 $(33,136) $48,020
 $(29,941)
Customer relationships10 30,583
 (11,871) 27,915
 (8,147)
Trademarks and Trade Names10 14,525
 (5,205) 13,282
 (3,431)
Developed technology5 3,228
 (2,313) 2,951
 (1,525)
Total  $96,464
 $(52,525) $92,168
 $(43,044)
  December 31,
  20202019
Estimated
Useful
Life (Yrs)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Payor relationships3 - 15$341,714 $(48,952)$45,200 $(35,980)
Developed technology514,100 (6,345)14,100 (3,525)
Trademarks and trade names3 - 1045,351 (986)200 (84)
New York LHCSA PermitIndefinite770 
Total$401,935 $(56,283)$59,500 $(39,589)
 
The gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 includes the asset impairment charge of $4,381 to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets of WD Services recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016. The weighted-average amortization period at December 31, 20172020 for intangibles was 12.3 years. NoNaN significant residual value is estimated for these intangible assets. Amortization expense from continuing operations was $7,927, $8,566$16.7 million, $6.2 million and $9,510$3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.





92


The total amortization expense is estimated to be as follows for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2017 based upon the applicable foreign exchange rates as of December 31, 2017:2020 (in thousands):
   
Year AmountYearAmount
2018 $8,126
2019 7,749
2020 7,473
2021 7,387
2021$38,504 
2022 7,025
202237,864 
Thereafter 6,179
2023202334,040 
2024202431,685 
2025202531,685 
Total $43,939
Total$173,778 
  
7.11.    Accrued Expenses
 
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:following (in thousands):
 
 December 31,
 20202019
Accrued contract payments$101,705 $15,706 
Accrued compensation and related liabilities57,201 8,941 
Other23,560 9,788 
Accrued cash settled stock-based compensation19,376 3,282 
Union pension obligation6,632 
Accrued interest4,927 228 
Accrued legal fees3,228 788 
Accrued income taxes2,042 
Total accrued expenses$218,671 $38,733 

The CARES Act (discussed in Note 21, Income Taxes) provides for deferred payment of the employer portion of social
security (FICA) taxes through the end of 2020, with 50% of the deferred amount due by December 31, 2021 and the remaining 50% due by December 31, 2022. The Accrued compensation and related liabilities amount includes $20.8 million related to this deferral.


 December 31,
 2017 2016
Accrued compensation and related$33,653
 $23,050
NET Services accrued contract payments17,487
 32,836
Accrued settlement15,000
 6,000
Income taxes payable3,723
 372
Other33,975
 40,123
Total accrued expenses$103,838
 $102,381


8.12. Restructuring Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs
 
WD Services has two active redundancy programs atCorporate and Other

On April 11, 2018, the Company announced the Organizational Consolidation to transfer all job responsibilities previously performed by employees of the holding company to ModivCare Solutions, LLC and to close the corporate offices in Stamford, Connecticut and Tucson, Arizona. The Company adopted an employee retention plan designed to retain the holding company level employees during the transition. The employee retention plan became effective on April 9, 2018 and provided for certain payments and benefits to those employees if they remained employed with the Company through a retention date established for each individual, subject to a fully executed retention letter. The Organizational Consolidation was completed during the second quarter of 2019.

A total of $4.3 million in restructuring and related costs was incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017. 2019, related to the Organizational Consolidation. These costs include $2.4 million of retention and personnel costs, $0.3 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.2 million of depreciation and $1.3 million of other costs, primarily related to recruiting and legal costs. These costs are recorded as “General and administrative expense” and “Depreciation and amortization” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

93


A total of $13.1 million in restructuring and related costs was incurred on a cumulative basis through December 31, 2019 related to the Organizational Consolidation. These costs include $7.5 million of retention and personnel costs, $2.0 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.7 million of depreciation and $2.8 million of other costs, primarily related to recruiting and legal costs.

No restructuring or related costs were incurred related to the Organizational Consolidation for the year ended December 31, 2020. There was 0 restructuring liability as of December 31, 2019 and 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, WD Services had four redundancy programs. Of2020, the Company incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring expense for the closure of its Las Vegas contact center. The majority of these four redundancy plans, twocosts were approved in 2015recorded to “Service expense” and have been completed; a plan relatedthe remainder were recorded to "General and administrative expense".

13. Debt

Finance Leases

At December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company's total finance lease obligations were $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Company has finance leases for IT hardware and software with termination dates ranging from January 2019 through October 2020. The terms of the leases are between 12 and 36 months, with interest recorded at an incremental borrowing rate of 3.28%. Due to the terminationadoption of employees delivering services under an offender rehabilitation program (“Offender Rehabilitation Program”) and a plan related toASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the termination of employees delivering services under the Company’s employability and skills training programs and certain other employees in the United Kingdom (“UK Restructuring Program”). In addition, a redundancy plan related to the termination of employees as part of a value enhancement project (“Ingeus Futures’ Program”) to better align costs with revenue for certain contracts in the UK and to improve overall operating performance was approved in 2016 and a further redundancy program to align costs with revenue for offender rehabilitation services (“Delivery First Program”) was approved in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company recorded severance and related charges of $2,577 and $8,511 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relating to the termination benefits for employee groups and specifically identified employees impacted by these plans. The severance charges incurred are recorded as “Service expense” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
The initial estimates of severance and related charges for the plans were based upon the employee groups impacted, average salary and benefits, and redundancy benefits pursuant to the existing policies. Additional charges above the initial estimates were incurred for the redundancy plans related to the actualization of termination benefits for specifically identified employees impacted under these plans, as well as an increase in the number of individuals impacted by these plans. The final identification of the employees impacted by each program is subject to customary consultation procedures. In addition, additional phases of value enhancement projects may be undertaken in the future, if costs and revenue are not aligned.


Summary of Severance and Related Charges
 
January 1,
2017
 
Costs
Incurred
 Cash Payments 
Foreign Exchange
Rate Adjustments
 December 31, 2017
Ingeus Futures' Program$2,486
 $1,223
 $(3,386) $159
 $482
Offender Rehabilitation Program1,380
 (40) (1,357) 17
 
UK Restructuring Program50
 (53) 
 3
 
Delivery First Program
 1,447
 (184) 24
 1,287
Total$3,916
 $2,577
 $(4,927) $203
 $1,769
 
January 1,
2016
 
Costs
Incurred
 Cash Payments 
Foreign Exchange
Rate Adjustments
 December 31, 2016
Ingeus Futures' Program$
 $2,515
 $
 $(29) $2,486
Offender Rehabilitation Program6,538
 4,865
 (8,924) (1,099) 1,380
UK Restructuring Program2,059
 1,131
 (3,031) (109) 50
Total$8,597
 $8,511
 $(11,955) $(1,237) $3,916
The total of accrued severance and related costs of $1,769 and $3,916 are reflected in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amount accrued as of December 31, 2017 for the Ingeus Futures’ Program and Delivery First Program is expected to be settled principally during 2018.
9. Long-Term Obligations
The Company’s long-term obligations were as follows:  
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
    
$200,000 revolving loan, LIBOR plus 2.25% - 3.25% with interest payable at least once every three months through August 2018$
 $
Capital lease obligations2,984
 3,611
 2,984
 3,611
Less current portion of capital lease obligations2,400
 1,721
Total long-term obligations, less current portion$584
 $1,890
Annual maturities ofrecognizes capital lease and obligations as finance lease assets and liabilities. For more information on the adoption of December 31, 2017 are as follows:ASC 842 and accounting for capital leases and obligations, see Note 17, Leases and Service Commitments.
Year Amount
2018 $2,400
2019 504
2020 80
Total $2,984



Credit Facility

The Company is a party to the amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement, dated as of August 2, 2013 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, and the other lenders party thereto. The Credit Agreement providesOn May 6, 2020, the Company with a $200,000entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Seventh Amendment”) which, among other things, extended the maturity date to August 1, 2021, expanded the amount available under the revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), including a from $200.0 million to $225.0 million, and increased the sub-facility of $25,000 for letters of credits from $25.0 million to $40.0 million. Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the Credit Facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount available to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit.

On October 16, 2020, the Company entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Eighth Amendment”), which among other things, amended the Credit Facility to permit the incurrence of additional debt to finance the acquisition (the "Simplura Acquisition") of OEP AM, Inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business as Simplura Health Group (“Simplura” and, together with its subsidiaries, the “Simplura Group”), permit borrowing under the Credit Facility to partially fund the Simplura Acquisition with limited conditions to such borrowing, increase the top interest rate margin that may apply to loans thereunder, and revise our permitted ratio of EBITDA to indebtedness. In addition, the Eighth Amendment extended the maturity date to August 2, 2023.

Effective as of the Eighth Amendment, interest on the outstanding principal amount of loans under the Credit Facility accrues, at the Company’s election, at a per annum rate equal to the greater of either LIBOR or 1.00%, plus an applicable margin, or the base rate as defined in the agreement plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.50% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.50% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement that governs our Credit Facility. The commitment fee and letter of credit fee ranges from 0.35% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.50%, respectively, in each case based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement that governs our Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had no0 borrowings and sevenoutstanding on the Credit Facility; however, had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $11,074 outstanding under the revolving credit facility. At$17.2 million. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s available credit under the revolving credit facilityCredit Facility was $188,926.$207.8 million. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has an option to request an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility from time to time (on substantially the same terms as apply to the existing facilities) in an aggregate amount of up to $75,000$75.0 million with either additional commitments from lenders under the Credit Agreement at such time or new commitments from financial institutions acceptable to the administrative agent in its reasonable discretion, so long as no default or event of default exists at the time of any such increase. The Company may not be able to access additional funds under this increase option as no lender is obligated to participate in any such increase under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility matures on August 2, 2018.


Interest on the outstanding principal amount of loans accrues, at the Company’s election, at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR, plus an applicable margin, or the base rate as defined in the agreement plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.25% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.25% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement. Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the Credit Facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount available to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit. The commitment fee and letter of credit fee range from 0.25% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.25%, respectively, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio.
94



The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s present and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain domestic subsidiaries which include the Company’s insurance captive.captive and the Company’s investment in Matrix. The Company’s obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of, the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s respective assets, including a pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, excluding the Company’s insurance captive, and 65% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Company’s first tier foreign subsidiaries.captive.


The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments, give guarantees, pay dividends, sell assets, and merge and consolidate. The Company is subject to financial covenants, including consolidated net leverage and consolidated interest coverage covenants.
Capital Leases
NET Services has seven capital leases for information technology hardware and software The Company was in compliance with termination dates ranging from January 2018 through October 2020. The termsall covenants under the Credit Agreement as of the leases are between 12 and 36 months, with interest recorded at an incremental borrowing rate of 3.28%. At December 31, 2017, $6,045 represents equipment under capital leases2020.

Senior Unsecured Notes

On November 4, 2020, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% senior unsecured notes due on November 15, 2025 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated November 4, 2020 (the “Indenture”), between the Company and $1,642 represents accumulated depreciation recognized on this leased equipment.The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”).
10. Convertible Preferred Stock, Net

The Company completed a rights offering on February 5, 2015 (the “Rights Offering”) providingNotes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company's future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, be effectively subordinated to any of the Company's existing and future secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and be structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of each of the Company’s existing commonnon-guarantor subsidiaries.

The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness or issue disqualified capital stock; make certain investments; create or incur certain liens; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; merge, consolidate, amalgamate or transfer substantially all of its assets; agree to dividend or other payment restrictions affecting its restricted subsidiaries; and transfer or sell assets, including capital stock holdersof its restricted subsidiaries. These covenants, however, are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications, and certain covenants may be suspended in the non-transferrable rightevent the Notes are assigned an investment grade rating from two of three ratings agencies.

The Indenture provides that the Notes may become subject to purchase their pro rata shareredemption under certain circumstances, including if certain escrowed property has not been released from the escrow account in connection with the consummation of $65,500the acquisition of convertible preferred stockthe Simplura Group. The Company may also redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to November 15, 2022, at a price equal to $100.00 per share (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock is convertible into shares100% of Providence’s Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”)the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption plus a “make-whole” premium set forth in the Indenture. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 40% of the Notes prior to November 15, 2022, at a conversionredemption price of 105.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, subject to certain conditions as specified in the Indenture Agreement. At any time prior to November 15, 2022, during each calendar year, the Company may redeem up to 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes at a purchase price equal to $39.88 per share, which was the closing price103% of the Company’saggregate principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

On or after November 15, 2022, the Company may redeem all or a part of the Notes upon not less than ten days’ nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes redeemed, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on November 15 of the years indicated below:

YearPercentage
2022102.938%
2023101.469%
2024 and thereafter100.000%

The Company will pay interest on the Notes at 5.875% per annum until maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, with the first interest payment date being May 15th, 2021. Principal payments are not required until the maturity date on November 15, 2025 when 100% of the outstanding principal will be required to be repaid. As a part of the bond issuance process, we incurred a $9.0 million bridge commitment fee that provided a potential funding backstop in the event that the Notes did not meet the desired subscription level to be used to acquire Simplura. That commitment expired unused upon closing of the Notes and the fee was expensed in Q4 2020.
95



Debt issuance costs of $14.5 million were incurred in relation to the Notes issuance and these costs were deferred and amortized to interest cost over the term of the Notes. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $14.0 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs was netted against the long-term debt balance on the balance sheet.

14. Convertible Preferred Stock

Following (i) the completion of a rights offering in February 2015, under which certain holders of our Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 22, 2014.
Stockholders exercised subscription rights to purchase 130,884 sharesPreferred Stock, and (ii) the purchase of the Company's Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Standby Purchase Agreement (the “Standby Purchase Agreement”) betweenStock by Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC - Series A and Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC (collectively, the “Standby Purchasers”“Coliseum Stockholders”), pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement between the Coliseum Stockholders and the Company, the remaining 524,116 us, we issued 805,000 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, which were purchased by the Standby Purchasers at the $100.00 per share subscription price. The Company received $65,500 in aggregate gross proceeds from the consummation of the Rights Offering and Standby Purchase Agreement. Additionally, on March 12, 2015, the Standby Purchasers exercised their right to purchase an additional 150,000 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, ateligible for a purchase price of $105.00


per share or a total purchase price of $15,750, of the same series and having the same conversion price as the Preferred Stock sold in the Rights Offering.
The Company may pay a noncumulative cash dividend on each share of Preferred Stock, ifwhen, as and whenif declared by a committee of itsour Board, of Directors (“Board”), at the rate of five and one-half percent (5.5%)5.5% per annum on the liquidation preference then in effect. On or before the third business day immediately preceding each fiscal quarter, the Company must determine its intention whether or not to pay a cash dividend with respect to that ensuing quarter and will give notice of its intention to each holder of Preferred Stock as soon as practicable thereafter.
In the event the Company does not declare and pay a cash dividend, the Company will declare a payment in kind (“PIK”) dividend by increasing the liquidation preference of the convertible Preferred Stock to an amount equal to the liquidation preference in effect at the start of the applicable dividend period, plus an amount equal to the liquidation preference then in effect multiplied by eight and one-half percent (8.5%) per annum, computed on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual number of days elapsed from the start of the applicable dividend period to the applicable date of determination. All holders of the Company’s Preferred Stock are able to convert their Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock at a rate of approximately 2.51 shares of Common Stock for each share of Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2017, 1,800 shares of Preferred Stock have been converted to 4,510 shares of Common Stock.


Cash dividends arewere payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and, commenced on April 1, 2015, and, if declared, beginbegan to accrue on the first day of the applicable dividend period. PIK dividends, if applicable, accrue cumulatively on the same schedule as set forth above for cash dividends and are also compounded at the applicable annual rate on each applicable subsequent dividend date. Cash dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock totaling $4,418, or $5.50 per share, $4,419, or $5.50 per share,$2.0 million, $4.4 million, and $3,928, or $4.88 per share,$4.4 million were distributed to convertible preferred stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

Preferred Stock Conversion

On June 8, 2020, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Conversion Agreement (the “Conversion Agreement”) with Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P. and certain funds and accounts managed by Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Holders”), pursuant to which, among other things, (a) the Company agreed to purchase 369,120 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, held by the Holders in the aggregate, in exchange for (i) $209.88 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock, plus (ii) a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through the day prior to June 11, 2020, and (b) the Holders converted 369,120 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into (i) 2.5075 shares of Common Stock of the Company for each share of Series A Preferred Stock, plus (ii) a cash payment equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through the day prior to June 11, 2020, plus (iii) a cash payment of $8.82 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The Conversion Agreement was considered to be an induced conversion in which a premium consideration was provided by the Company to Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock.

On September 3, 2020, the Company elected to effect the conversion (the “Conversion”) of all of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. In accordance with the Preferred Stock Conversion Agreement dated June 8, 2020, the Company repurchased 27,509 shares of Series A Preferred Stock from the Holders for (i) a cash amount equal to $209.88 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, plus (ii) a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares through the day prior to the Conversion. In connection with the Conversion, all remaining outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into Common Stock at the conversion rate of 2.5075 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock and cash-in-lieu of fractional shares.

In accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, retained earnings was reduced by the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred over the carrying amount of the shares surrendered. The impact to retained earnings of the excess consideration transferred, including the direct costs incurred, and write-off of any unamortized issuance costs was $52.1 million as of December 31, 2020.

The Preferred Stock iswas accounted for outside of stockholders’ equity as it maycould be redeemed upon certain change in control events that arewere not solely in the control of the Company. Dividends arewere recorded in stockholders’ equity and consist of the 5.5%/8.5% dividend. At the time of issuance of the Preferred Stock, the Company recorded a discount on Preferred Stock related to beneficial conversion features that arose due to the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock being higher than the conversion price of the Preferred Stock on the commitment date. The amortization of this discount was recorded in stockholders’ equity. The discount was fully amortized as of June 30, 2015.
 
The following table summarizes the Preferred Stock activity for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:  2019 (in thousands, except share count):
 
96


Dollar ValueShare Count
Dollar Value Share Count
Balance at December 31, 2015$77,576
 803,518
Balance at December 31, 2018Balance at December 31, 2018$77,392 801,606 
Conversion to common stock(12) (120)Conversion to common stock(284)(2,818)
Allocation of issuance costs1
 
Allocation of issuance costs12 — 
Balance at December 31, 2016$77,565
 803,398
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$77,120 798,788 
Conversion to common stock(20) (198)Conversion to common stock(3,335)(33,039)
Conversion to common stock pursuant to Conversion AgreementConversion to common stock pursuant to Conversion Agreement(37,256)(369,120)
Preferred stock redemption pursuant to Conversion AgreementPreferred stock redemption pursuant to Conversion Agreement(40,033)(396,629)
Allocation of issuance costs1
 
Allocation of issuance costs3,504 — 
Balance at December 31, 2017$77,546
 803,200
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$
 
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock were convertible into 2,014,042 and 2,014,5382.0 million shares of Common Stock, respectively.Stock. As of December 31, 2020, there were 0 shares of convertible preferred stock outstanding.
 
11.15.    Stockholders’ Equity
 
At December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 there were 17,473,59819.6 million and 17,315,66118.1 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock issued, respectively, including 4,126,1325.3 million and 3,478,6765.1 million treasury shares at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
 
Subject to the rights specifically granted to holders of any then outstanding shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, the Company’s common stockholders are entitled to vote together as a class on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s common stockholders, and are entitled to any dividends that may be declared by the Board. The Company’s common stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. Upon the Company’s dissolution, liquidation or winding up, holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in the Company’s net assets after payment or provision for all liabilities and any


preferential liquidation rights of the Company’s Preferred Stock then outstanding. The Company’s common stockholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase shares of the Company’s stock. The issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not convertible into any other shares of the Company’s capital stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of the Company’s Common Stock will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock the Company may issue in the future.
 
The following table reflects the total numberAs of December 31, 2020, 0.4 million shares of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock were reserved for future issuance asissuances related to the exercise of December 31, 2017:stock options and restricted stock awards.
  
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Shares of common stock reserved for:
Exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards681,608
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock2,014,042
Issuance of Performance Restricted Stock Units18,122
Total shares of common stock reserved for future issuance2,713,772

Share Repurchases 

On October 14, 2015,August 6, 2019, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company entered into an agreement to repurchase 707,318 of its Common Stock held by former stockholders of Matrix for an aggregate purchase price of $29,000 (or $41.00 per share). The Company funded this purchase through a combination of borrowing on its Credit Facility and cash on hand. The purchase of these shares was completed on October 30, 2015.
On November 4, 2015, the Board authorized the Company to engage in a repurchase program tocould repurchase up to $70,000$100.0 million in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stock, duringsubject to the twelve-month period following November 4, 2015. This plan terminated on November 3, 2016.consent of the holders of a majority of the Company’s Series A total of 1,360,249 shares were purchasedconvertible preferred stock, through this plan for $62,981, excluding commission payments.

December 31, 2019, at which time it expired. On October 26, 2016,March 11, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program under which the Company maycould repurchase up to $100,000$75.0 million in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stock, duringsubject to the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. Through October 26, 2017,consent of the holders of a total of 770,808 shares were purchased through this plan for $30,360, excluding commission payments.

On November 2, 2017, the Board approved the extensionmajority of the Company’s October 26, 2016Series A convertible preferred stock, repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69,640 (the amount remaining from the $100,000 repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. As2020. A total of December 31, 2017, 180,2700.2 million and 0.1 million shares were repurchased under this plan after it was extended on November 2, 2017program for $10,503, excluding commission payments.approximately $10.2 million and $6.0 million, during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
 
Equity Award Withholding

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the Company withheld 19,556, 2,7362,824, 13,268 and 15,9615,242 shares, respectively, from employees to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from vesting of restricted stock awards.awards and units. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2015,2018, the Company withheld 5,665322,034 and 5,71812,676 shares, respectively, from employees to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations and the exercise price upon the exercise of stock options. DuringThere were 0 shares withheld for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company withheld 43,743 shares to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from shares held by employees that were released from escrow related to the Matrix acquisition, which shares are treated as treasury stock.2019.



12.

97


16.    Stock-Based Compensation and Similar Arrangements
 
The Company provides stock-based compensation to employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan allows the flexibility to grant or award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, stock units including restricted stock units and performance awards to eligible persons.




The following table summarizes the activity under the 2006 Plan as of December 31, 2017:2020:
 
Number of shares
of the Company’s Common Stock authorized for
Number of shares
of the Company’s
Common Stock remaining for
Number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to
 issuancefuture grantsStock OptionsStock Grants
2006 Plan5,400,000 1,250,381 297,379 93,227 
 
Number of shares
of the Company's Common Stock authorized for
 
Number of shares
of the Company's
Common Stock remaining for
 Number of shares of the Company's Common Stock subject to
 issuance future grants Stock Options Stock Grants
2006 Plan5,400,000
 1,938,666
 606,695
 111,157

The following table reflects the amount of stock-based compensation for continuing operations, for share settled awards, issued to employees and non-employee directors, recorded in each financial statement line item for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018 (in thousands):
 
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015202020192018
Service expense$491
 $830
 $21,480
Service expense$222 $572 $200 
General and administrative expense7,052
 4,324
 5,027
General and administrative expense3,708 4,842 $8,787 
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees76
 18
 
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 (18) 115
Equity in net loss of investeesEquity in net loss of investees137 
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxIncome from discontinued operations, net of tax
Total stock-based compensation$7,619
 $5,154
 $26,622
Total stock-based compensation$3,930 $5,414 $9,130 
 
Stock-based compensation included in serviceGeneral and administrative expense is related to the following segments:NEMT Segment, except a select group of employees that are included within Service expense. The amount included in equity in net loss of investee is related to the Matrix Investment Segment, as a member of Matrix management held ModivCare equity awards.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
NET Services$434
 $841
 $724
WD Services (a)57
 (11) 20,756
Total stock-based compensation in service expense$491
 $830
 $21,480
(a)WD Services includes $16,078 for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the acceleration of awards pursuant to the separation agreements for two executives.


The amounts above exclude tax benefits of $2,885, $2,072$1.1 million, $1.4 million and $2,322$1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


Stock Options
 
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not grant any stock options. The fair value of each stock option awarded to employees is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula based on the following assumptions for the years ended December 31, 20172020, 2019, and 2015:2018:
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Expected dividend yield0.0%0.0%0.0%
Expected stock price volatility28.3%38.1%27.5%33.0%26.5%39.8%
Risk-free interest rate0.2%1.4%1.6%2.5%2.3%2.9%
Expected life of options (years)3.54.41.85.31.36.5
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2015
Expected dividend yield0.0% 0.0%
Expected stock price volatility19.45%42.95% 33.8%46.14%
Risk-free interest rate0.95%2.23% 0.4%1.35%
Expected life of options (years)0.036.50 0.034.00


The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury security rate in effect as of the date of grant which corresponds to the expected life of the award. The expected stock price volatility was based on the Company’s historical data. The expected


lives of options were based on the Company’s historical data, a simplified method for plain vanilla options, or the Company’s best estimate where appropriate.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, James Lindstrom resigned froma lattice model for more exotic options. The simplified method was used for plain vanilla options for which the Company as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")did not have sufficient historical data to use in determining the expected life.

98


Stock options granted under the 2006 Plan vest ratably in equal annual installments over 3 to 4 years, or, for certain grants, over periods designated in the respective employee’s agreements, and board member of the Company. As a result of Mr. Lindstrom's resignation as CEO, a separation agreement was entered into between the Company and Mr. Lindstrom. As a result of this separation agreement, Mr. Lindstrom was granted 125,000 stock options with an exercise price of $61.33 per share that were immediately vested. The options are exercisable through December 31, 2018.expire after 5 to 10 years.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company issued 91,4000.4 million shares of its Common Stock in connection with the exercise of employee stock options under the Company’s 2006 Plan.
 
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:2020:
 
 Year ended December 31, 2017
 
Number
of Shares
Under
Option
 
Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at beginning of period355,598
 $33.48
    
Granted371,775
 57.08
    
Exercised(115,825) 29.77
    
Forfeited/Cancelled(854) 46.44
    
Expired(3,999) 24.59
    
Outstanding at end of period606,695
 $48.70
 2.62 $6,705
Vested or expected to vest at end of period606,695
 $48.70
 2.62 $6,705
Exercisable at end of period357,984
 $44.65
 2.10 $5,508
 Year ended December 31, 2020
Number
of Shares
Under
Option
Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at beginning of period, January 1642,496 $64.75   
Granted97,377 71.56 
Exercised(372,478)68.22   
Forfeited/Canceled(63,672)61.84   
Expired(6,344)14.19   
Outstanding at end of period, December 31297,379 $64.32 4.82$22,103 
Vested or expected to vest at end of period, December 31297,379 $64.32 4.82$22,103 
Exercisable at end of period, December 3154,546 $61.59 3.72$4,202 
 
The weighted-average grant-dategrant date fair value for options granted, total intrinsic value and cash received by the Company related to options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 were as follows:follows (in thousands, except for share price):
 
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$9.05
 $
 $8.77
Options exercised:     
Total intrinsic value$2,010
 $979
 $6,659
Cash received$1,921
 $4,108
 $4,894
Stock Option Modifications
During the fourth quarter of 2017, as a result of the separation agreement between the Company and Mr. Lindstrom, Mr. Lindstrom's outstanding stock options from his grants of 11,319 on August 6, 2015 and 9,798 on March 15, 2017 were modified to accelerate the vesting date of both awards to November 15, 2017 and allow exercise of the stock options until December 31, 2018. As a result of the modification to the terms of the original stock options granted to Mr. Lindstrom, the Company recognized an accelerated expense of $83 on the award for the year ended December 31, 2017.

During the second quarter of 2015, Warren Rustand terminated his role as CEO and board member of the Company, but remained employed as a Senior Advisor through the end of 2015. As a result of Mr. Rustand’s termination as CEO, a separation agreement was entered into between the Company and Mr. Rustand. As a result of this separation agreement, Mr. Rustand’s outstanding stock options from his grant of 200,000 stock options on September 11, 2014 were modified to accelerate the vesting date for the second tranche of options from June 30, 2015 to June 5, 2015, and the exercise period for all vested options of 133,332 was lengthened. In addition, the third tranche of options, consisting of 66,668 options, was cancelled. As a result of the modifications


to the terms of the original stock options granted to Mr. Rustand, the Company recognized additional stock-based compensation expense of $737 for the year ended December 31, 2015.
 Year ended December 31,
 202020192018
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$71.56 $16.30 $15.08 
Options exercised:   
Total intrinsic value$26,228 $3,204 $6,805 
Cash received$25,413 $11,142 $12,413 
 
Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards (RSAs) granted under the 2006 Plan vest ratably in equal annual installments over 3 to 4 years, or, for certain grants, over periods designated in the respective employee’s agreements or as determined by the Compensation Committee.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 33,420 shares of restricted stock (“RSAs”) to non-employee directors of its Board, executive officers and certain key employees. The awards primarily vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company issued 36,62322,724 shares of its Common Stock to non-employee directors, executive officers and key employees upon the vesting of certain RSAs granted in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 under the Company’s 2006 Plan. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 10,134 shares were vested but not released due to an additional holding period required by the grant agreement.
 
The following table summarizes the activity of the shares and weighted-average grant date fair value of the Company’s unvested restricted Common Stock during the year ended December 31, 2017:2020:

99


Shares
Weighted-average
grant date
fair value
Shares 
Weighted-average
grant date
fair value
   
Non-vested at beginning of period72,198
 $44.44
Non-vested at beginning of period, January 1Non-vested at beginning of period, January 191,477 $59.84 
Granted33,420
 $43.91
Granted39,566 $71.30 
Vested(36,623) $43.42
Vested(22,724)$60.11 
Forfeited or cancelled(4,216) $47.17
Forfeited or cancelled(15,092)$58.84 
Non-vested at end of period64,779
 $44.82
Non-vested at end of period, December 31Non-vested at end of period, December 3193,227 $64.81 
 
As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $4,331approximately $7.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share settled stock options and RSAs granted under the 2006 Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.24.82 years. The total fair value of vested stock options and RSAs vested was $3,550, $1,383$5.2 million, $6.9 million and $3,709$4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Other Restricted Stock Award Grants
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Board approved the grant of 596,915 RSAs to two individuals in connection with the Ingeus acquisition. The grants were made outside of the 2006 Plan, as they were related to the acquisition. However, since the term of the awards provided for vesting based on continued employment, the awards were accounted for as stock-based compensation. The shares necessary to settle these awards were placed in an escrow account in 2014, and were releasable from escrow in accordance with the vesting of the awards. Per the original terms of the agreements, the awards vested upon continued employment of the grantees, in four equal installments on the anniversary date of the grant. However, on October 15, 2015, the Company entered into agreements whereby the executives’ employment was terminated by mutual agreement and vesting was no longer based upon continued employment. The Company recognized $16,078 in stock-based compensation expense at the time of the modification, which otherwise would have been recognized over the remainder of the vesting period. Additionally, the Company recognized accelerated deferred compensation expense of $4,714 related to these agreements during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2017, 149,228 underlying shares to settle the awards are held in the escrow account and will be released in 2018, although all expense was recognized as of December 31, 2015.
Restricted Stock Units
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 5,930 restricted stock units to a key employee, related to the terms of a separation agreement, that vested on January 3, 2017. The units were settled through a cash payment of $304 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The award was liability classified, and the expense recorded was based upon the Company’s closing stock price at the end of each reporting period and the completed requisite service period.


Performance Restricted Stock Units
The Company had 18,122 performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) outstanding at December 31, 2017. These awards vest upon the Company or its segments meeting certain performance criteria over a set performance period as determined, and subject to adjustment, by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board. 13,262 of the outstanding PRSUs at December 31, 2017 have a performance criteria tied to the Company’s return on equity (“ROE”), with performance periods ending on December 31, 2017. The grantees will earn 33% of PRSUs granted if the ROE is 12% but less than 15%, and 100% of the PRSUs granted if the ROE is 15% or more. If ROE is less than 12%, no PRSUs will be earned. The Company has determined, subsequent to December 31, 2017, that none of these PRSUs, with a performance period ended December 31, 2017, will vest. 4,860 of the outstanding PRSUs at December 31, 2017 have a performance criteria tied to NET Services’ EBITDA and the Company’s EBITDA performance with performance periods ending on December 31, 2017. The Company expects all of these PRSUs, with a performance period ended December 31, 2017, to vest. Compensation expense (benefit) related to these awards totaled $19, ($270) and $613 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


Cash Settled Awards
 
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, the Company issued 3,097, 3,3601,952, 1,857 and 4,0002,017 stock equivalent units (“SEUs”), which settle in cash upon vesting, to Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., in lieu of a grantgrants to Christopher Shackelton, Chairman of the Board, for his service on the Board, which vest one-third upon each anniversaryover a period ofone to three years from the vesting date. The fair value of the SEUs is based on the closing stock price on the last day of the period and the completed requisite service period. The Company recorded $235, $287an expense of $0.3 million and $588 of expense$0.2 million for SEUs during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2018, respectively. The Company had an immaterial expense for SEUs for the year ended December 31, 2019.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 200,000 stock option equivalent units (“SOEUs”), with an exercise price of $43.81 per share, which settle in cash, to Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P in lieu of a grant to Christopher Shackelton, for other services rendered. All 200,000 SOEUs were outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017. This award vested one-third upon grant, one-third on June 30, 2015 and one-third on June 30, 2016. No2020. NaN additional SOEUs were granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018. The Company recorded $2,146 and $1,888an expense of expense$15.8 million for SOEUs during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively, and a benefit of $1,517 during the year ended December 31, 2016. The expenses2020 and a benefit of $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These impacts are included in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income. The fair value of the SOEUs was estimated as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula and amortized over the option’s graded vesting periods with the following assumptions:
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Expected dividend yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Expected stock price volatility23.36%32.09% 35.71%41.82% 43.75%45.3%
Risk-free interest rate1.75%1.95% 1.11%1.64% 1.2%1.70%
Expected life of options (in years)0.752.75 1.03.00 2.754.75
operations.
 
As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had a short-term liability of $3,938$19.0 million and $1,764,$3.3 million, respectively, in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheetsheets related to unexercised vested and unvested cash settled share-based payment awards. The cash settled share-based compensation benefit in total excluded tax expense of $492 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The cash settled share-based compensation expense in total excluded a tax benefit of $908 and $990$4.5 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020, tax expense of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2015.a tax benefit of $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The unrecognized compensation cost for SEUs is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.8 years; however, the total expense for both SEUs and SOEUs will continue to be adjusted until the awards are settled.
 
Holdco
17. Long-Term Incentive PlanPlans
 
On August 6, 2015 (the “Award Date”),In connection with the Compensation Committeeacquisition of Circulation, the Board adoptedCompany established a management incentive plan (“MIP”). During the HoldCo LTIP underthree months ended March 31, 2019, the 2006 Plan. The Holdco LTIPMIP was designedamended to remove the previously included performance requirements and to provide long-term performance based awardsfor a total fixed payment of $12.0 million to certain executive officersthe group of Providence. UnderMIP participants. During the program, executives would receive shares of Providence Common Stock based on the shareholder value created in excess of an 8.0% compounded annual return between the Award Date andyear ended December 31, 2017 (the “Extraordinary Shareholder Value”). The Award Date value2019, the MIP was calculated on the basis of the Providence stock price equal to the volume weighted average of the common share price over the 90-day trading period ending on the Award Date. The Extraordinary Shareholder Value was calculated on the basis of the Providence stock price equal to the volume weighted average of the common share price


over the 90-day trading period ending on December 31, 2017. A pool for use in the allocation of awards was created equal to 8.0% of the Extraordinary Shareholder Value.

Participants in the HoldCo LTIP would receive a percentage allocation of any such pool and, following determination of the size of the pool, would be entitledfurther amended to a numbertotal fixed payment of shares equal to their pro rata portion of$2.7 million. The payout date is within 30 days following the pool divided by the volume weighted averagefinalization of the Company’s per share price overaudited financial statements for the 90-day trading periodfiscal year ending on December 31, 2017. Of the shares allocated, 60% would be issued to the participant on or shortly following determination of the pool, 25% would vest and be issued on the one-year anniversary of such determination date, subject to continued employment,2021 and the remaining 15% would be issued on the second anniversary of the determination date, subject to continued employment.

It was determined that no shares would be distributed under the Holdco LTIP as the calculation of the pool amount was zero. $4,738, $3,319 and $1,353 of expense is included in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the Company accelerated all remaining unrecognized compensation expense for the Holdco LTIP as there was no further requisite service period associated with the award, resulting in an acceleration of expense of $1,053.

These awards were equity classified and the fair value of the awards was calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation valuation model. The fair value of the awards granted in 2016 and 2015 were estimated using the following assumptions:
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Forward interest rate0.24%2.71% 0.04%2.90%
Expected Volatility40.0% 45.0%
Dividend Yield—% —%
Fair Value of Total Pool$12,870 $12,590
13. Vertical Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company established Long-Term Incentive Plans (“Vertical LTIPs”) for the Company’s operating segments, or verticals, during the fourth quarter of 2015. The Vertical LTIPs are consistent in their basic terms, but each were customized for specific aspects of the associated vertical. The awards pay in cash, however up to 50% of the award may be paid in unrestricted stock if the recipient elects this option when the Vertical LTIP offer letter is received. In addition, at the discretion of the Company, the recipients may be able to elect unrestricted stock in lieu of cash compensation at a later date. The Vertical LTIPs reward participants based on certain measures of free cash flow and EBITDA results adjusted as specified in the plan document. The awards vest in three installments: 60% of the award will pay out immediately following December 31, 2017, 25% one year following the performance period (i.e. December 31, 2018) and 15% two years following the performance period (i.e. December 31, 2019). Payoutpayout is subject to the participant remaining employed by the Company.

During 2017, the Company revised the structure of the NET Services long-term incentive plan. As a result, the Company finalized the amount payable under the plan at $2,956. The total value will be paid to the awarded participants per the terms of the original agreement and thus the remaining unamortized expense relating to this plan continues to be recognized over the remaining service period.through December 31, 2021, except for certain termination scenarios. As of December 31, 2017, unamortized compensation expense is $299. For the years ended2020 and December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, $816, $1,513 and $328 of expense,2019, the Company has accrued $2.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, is included in “Service expense” in the consolidated statements of income related to this plan. At December 31, 2017, the liability for long-term incentive plans of the Company’s operating segments of $2,657 isMIP and reflected in “Accrued expenses”"Accrued Expenses" and “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet.  At December 31, 2016, the liability for long-term incentive plans of the Company’s operating segments of $1,841 is reflected in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet.sheets.
100




14.18.  Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
The following table details the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
 
Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 202020192018
Numerator:     Numerator:   
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
Less dividends on convertible preferred stock(4,419) (4,419) (3,935)
Less accretion of convertible preferred stock discount
 
 (1,071)
Less income allocated to participating securities(7,085) (13,135) (10,691)
Net income available to common stockholders$41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCareNet income (loss) attributable to ModivCare$88,836 $966 $(18,981)
Dividends on convertible preferred stock outstandingDividends on convertible preferred stock outstanding(1,171)(4,403)(4,413)
Dividends paid pursuant to the Conversion AgreementDividends paid pursuant to the Conversion Agreement(816)
Consideration paid in excess of preferred cost basis pursuant to the Conversion AgreementConsideration paid in excess of preferred cost basis pursuant to the Conversion Agreement(52,139)
Income allocated to participating securitiesIncome allocated to participating securities(2,239)(1,863)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersNet income (loss) available to common stockholders$32,471 $(3,437)$(25,257)
     
Continuing operations$47,848
 $(21,251) $(29,181)Continuing operations$33,249 $(9,356)$11,953 
Discontinued operations(5,983) 95,625
 97,180
Discontinued operations(778)5,919 (37,210)
$41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersNet income (loss) available to common stockholders$32,471 $(3,437)$(25,257)
     
Denominator:     Denominator:   
Denominator for basic earnings per share -- weighted-average shares13,602,140
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Denominator for basic earnings per share -- weighted-average shares13,567,323 12,958,713 12,960,837 
Effect of dilutive securities:     Effect of dilutive securities:   
Common stock options66,314
 
 
Common stock options71,651 72,410 
Performance-based restricted stock units4,860
 
 
Restricted stock unitsRestricted stock units44,334 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share -- adjusted weighted-average shares assumed conversion13,673,314
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Denominator for diluted earnings per share -- adjusted weighted-average shares assumed conversion13,683,308 12,958,713 13,033,247 
     
Basic earnings (loss) per share:     Basic earnings (loss) per share:   
Continuing operations$3.52
 $(1.45) $(1.83)Continuing operations$2.45 $(0.72)$0.92 
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Discontinued operations(0.06)0.46 (2.87)
$3.08
 $5.07
 $4.26
Basic earnings (loss) per share Basic earnings (loss) per share$2.39 $(0.26)$(1.95)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:      Diluted earnings (loss) per share:   
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83)Continuing operations$2.43 $(0.72)$0.92 
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Discontinued operations(0.06)0.46 (2.86)
$3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
Diluted earnings (loss) per share Diluted earnings (loss) per share$2.37 $(0.26)$(1.94)
 
The accretion of Preferred Stock discount in the table above related to a beneficial conversion feature of the Company’s Preferred Stock that was fully amortized as of June 30, 2015. Income allocated to participating securities is calculated by allocating a portion of net income attributable to Providence,ModivCare, less dividends on convertible stock, to the convertible preferred stockholders on a pro-rata as converted basis; however, the convertible preferred stockholders are not allocated losses.


The following weighted-average shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Stock options to purchase common stock362,392
 22,638
 173,925
Convertible preferred stock803,323
 803,442
 700,241


15.    Operating Leases
 Year ended December 31,
 202020192018
Stock options to purchase common stock43,061 583,469 560,547 
Convertible preferred stock800,460 802,489 
  
101


19.    Leases and Service Commitments

Subsequent to adoption of ASC 842:

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842 and recognized lease obligations and associated ROU assets for its existing non-cancelable operating leases. The Company has non-cancelable contractual obligations in the form of operating leases forprimarily associated with office space, related office equipment and other facilities.

The leases expire in various years and generally provide for renewal options. In the normal course of business, it is expectedmanagement expects that these leases will be renewed or replaced by leases on other properties.
 
Certain operating leases provide for increases in future minimum annual rental payments based on defined increases in the Consumer Price Index, subject to certain minimum increases. Several of these lease agreements contain provisions for periods in which rent payments are reduced. The total amount of rental payments due over the lease term is being charged torecorded as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The cumulative difference between rent expense recorded

To determine whether a contract contained a lease, the Company evaluated its contracts and verified that there was an identified asset and that the Company, or the tenant, had the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the contract term. If a contract was determined to contain a lease and the amount paid,Company was a lessee, the lease was evaluated to determine whether it was an operating or financing lease.

The discount rate used for continuing operations,each lease was determined by estimating an appropriate incremental borrowing rate. In estimating an incremental borrowing rate, the Company considered the debt information, credit rating, and interest rate on the revolving credit facility, which is collateralized by the Company's assets. Accordingly, the Company continued discounting its remaining operating lease payments for calculating its lease liability using a rate of 5.25%. The Company applied this rate to its entire portfolio of leases on the basis that any adjustments to the rate for lease term or asset classification would not affect the interest rate charged under the debt or have a material effect on the discounted lease liability.

A summary of all lease classifications in our consolidated balance sheet is as follows (in thousands):

LeasesClassificationDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets
Operating lease assetsOperating lease ROU assets$30,928 $20,095 
Finance lease assets
Property and equipment, net (1)
367 555 
  Total leased assets$31,295 $20,650 
Liabilities
Current:
   OperatingCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$8,277 $6,730 
   FinanceCurrent portion of long-term obligations45 308 
Long-term:
   OperatingOperating lease liabilities, less current portion23,437 14,502 
   FinanceFinance lease liabilities, less current portion45 
  Total lease liabilities$31,759 $21,585 
(1) Finance leased assets have an accumulated amortization of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.








102


As of December 31, 2020, maturities of lease liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

Operating LeasesFinance LeasesTotal
2021$10,323 $45 $10,368 
20228,756 8,756 
20236,140 6,140 
20244,145 4,145 
20252,833 2,833 
Thereafter4,737 4,737 
Total lease payments$36,934 $45 $36,979 
Less: interest and accretion(5,220)(5,220)
Present value of minimum lease payments$31,714 $45 $31,759 
Less: current portion(8,277)(45)(8,322)
Long-term portion$23,437 $$23,437 


As of December 31, 20172019, maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
Operating LeasesFinance LeasesTotal
2020$7,586 $308 $7,894 
20215,845 45 5,890 
20224,869 4,869 
20232,890 2,890 
20241,330 1,330 
Thereafter830 830 
Total lease payments$23,350 $353 $23,703 
Less: interest and accretion(2,118)(2,118)
Present value of minimum lease payments$21,232 $353 $21,585 
Less: current portion(6,730)(308)(7,038)
Long-term portion$14,502 $45 $14,547 

Lease terms and 2016discount rates are as follows:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
   Operating lease costs4.893.68
   Finance lease cost0.081.34
Weighted-average discount rate:
   Operating lease costs5.25%5.25 %
   Finance lease cost3.28%3.28 %

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, our operating lease cost was $3,957$10.4 million and $3,253,$10.6 million, respectively, and is primarily included in “Accrued expenses” and “Other long-term liabilities” in the"Service expense” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.statements of operations. A summary of other lease information is as follows (in thousands):
103


Year Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2019
Financing cash flows from finance leases$(336)$(718)
Operating cash flows from operating leases(10,771)(10,919)
Amortization of operating leased ROU assets to the operating lease liability9,238 10,133 
ROU assets obtained through operating lease liabilities19,992 6,787 


Service Commitments
 
The Company entered into a contract related to transportation services that includes a minimum volume requirement. If the Company does not utilize the minimum level of services specified in the agreement, a penalty provision applies. Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases for equipment and property with initial terms of one year or morethe service commitments consisted of the following at December 31, 2017:2020 (in thousands):
 Service
 Commitment
2021$3,464 
Total future minimum payments$3,464 


 Operating
 Leases
2018$20,875
201913,376
20209,738
20218,022
20226,142
Thereafter3,939
Total future minimum lease payments$62,092
Rent expense for continuing operations related to operating leases was $27,511, $29,316 and $31,191, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Also, the lease agreements generally require the Company to pay executory costs such as real estate taxes, insurance, and repairs, which are recorded to expense as incurred.
16.20.    Retirement Plan
 
The Company maintains a qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for all employees of its NET ServicesNEMT Services’ operating segment and corporate personnel. The Company, at its discretion, may make a matching contribution to the plan. Any matching contributions vest over 5 years. Unvested matching contributions are forfeitable upon employee termination. Employee contributions are fully vested and non-forfeitable. The Company’s contributions to the plan for continuing operations were $320, $248$1.0 million, $0.3 million and $221,$0.3 million, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

The Personal Care Segment maintains retirement plans for its employees in the form of the All Metro Health Care 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the "Plan"), a defined contribution retirement plan. Employees who have attained the age of 21 and completed six months of employment are eligible. The Company matches 100% of employee contributions, excluding catch-up contributions, if applicable, up to 3% of compensation plus 50% of contributions for the next 2% of compensation.
 
WD Services’ employees are entitled to benefits under certain retirement plans. The WD Services’ segment has separate plans in each country it operates. The plans receive fixed contributions from WD Services’ companies and the legal or constructive obligation is limited to these contributions, although the benefits the employees ultimately receive are determined by the plan administrators, which includes government entities and third-party administrators. The Company’s contributions to these plans were $8,219, $9,139 and $10,331 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company also maintains a Deferred Compensation Rabbi Trust Plan for highly compensated employees of NET Services.employees. This plan was put in place to compensate for the inability of highly compensated employees to take full advantage of the Company’s 401(k) plan. Additional information is included in Note 18, 22, Commitments and Contingencies.
 



17.
104


21.    Income Taxes
 
The following table summarizes our U.S.federal and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:  
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
US48,719
 65,559
 43,598
Foreign15,485
 (67,437) (53,692)
Total$64,204
 $(1,878) $(10,094)
The federal, state and foreign income tax provision is summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Federal income tax (benefit) expense:   
Current$2,689 $(371)$3,462 
Deferred9,447 (1,166)(1,157)
  Total federal income tax (benefit) expense12,136 (1,537)2,305 
State income tax expense (benefit):   
Current10,197 2,562 2,113 
Deferred2,472 (1,598)266 
  Total state income tax expense12,669 964 2,379 
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes$24,805 $(573)$4,684 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Federal:     
Current$18,792
 $21,202
 $15,161
Deferred(19,767) (6,477) (1,606)
 (975) 14,725
 13,555
State:     
Current3,975
 4,580
 2,644
Deferred723
 (938) (38)
 4,698
 3,642
 2,606
Foreign:     
Current1,197
 266
 523
Deferred(519) (1,597) (2,101)
 678
 (1,331) (1,578)
      
Total provision for income taxes$4,401
 $17,036
 $14,583




A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes with amounts determined by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:follows (in thousands):
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rates35% 35 % 35 %
Federal income tax at statutory rates$22,471
 $(657) $(3,533)
Revaluation of net deferred tax liabilities due to U.S. tax reform(19,397) 
 
U.S. tax reform impact on equity income of investee(1,646) 
 
Change in valuation allowance2,299
 9,480
 3,574
Change in uncertain tax positions7
 73
 (76)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit3,203
 2,396
 1,785
Difference between federal statutory and foreign tax rate(1,648) 9,427
 4,642
Stock compensation3,400
 
 (184)
Meals and entertainment100
 96
 81
Amortization of deferred consideration
 
 9,444
Transaction costs159
 
 (447)
Contingent consideration liability reversal
 
 (854)
Nontaxable income(1,203) 
 (965)
Tax credits(354) (947) (456)
Legal expense(805) 522
 284
Depreciation
 
 649
Equity in net loss of investee569
 624
 366
Sale of joint venture(6,021) 
 
Asset impairment
 2,353
 
Foreign exchange2,925
 (7,001) 
Other342
 670
 273
Provision for income taxes$4,401
 $17,036
 $14,583
Effective income tax rate7% (907)% (144)%
The Company recognized an income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 despite having losses from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit currently cannot be recognized, and non-deductible expenses such as amortization of deferred consideration related to the Ingeus acquisition, the Company recognized estimated taxable income for these years upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.



 Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Federal statutory rates21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Federal income tax at statutory rates$24,028 $(1,160)$4,812 
Revaluation of net deferred tax liabilities due to U.S. tax reform(286)
Change in valuation allowance(505)10 36 
Change in uncertain tax positions116 181 108 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit11,107 721 1,843 
Non-taxable income(124)(93)
Compensation expense1,036 606 235 
Stock-based compensation(650)(101)76 
Meals and entertainment51 81 74 
Transaction costs1,289 263 
Gain on remeasurement of cost method investment(1,381)
Tax credits(650)(858)(1,208)
CARES Act Benefit(10,984)
Other91 40 112 
(Benefit) provision for income taxes$24,805 $(573)$4,684 
Effective income tax rate21.7 %10.4 %20.4 %
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities of continuing operations are as follows:follows (in thousands):



105


December 31, December 31,
2017 2016 20202019
Deferred tax assets:   Deferred tax assets:  
Net operating loss carryforwards$20,496
 $17,742
Net operating loss carryforwards$840 $14,357 
Capital loss carryforwardCapital loss carryforward957 1,406 
Tax credit carryforwards486
 399
Tax credit carryforwards389 792 
Interest expense carryforwardInterest expense carryforward1,570 
Accounts receivable allowance1,134
 1,341
Accounts receivable allowance1,923 1,497 
Accrued items and reserves14,371
 18,669
Accrued items and reserves14,511 2,854 
Stock compensation1,480
 4,224
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation852 1,276 
Deferred rent572
 915
Deferred rent382 476 
Property and equipment depreciation300
 
Deferred revenueDeferred revenue183 207 
Other173
 180
Other591 68 
Total deferred tax assets Total deferred tax assets22,198 22,933 
Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities:  
39,012
 43,470
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Deferred financing costs38
 154
Prepaids1,440
 2,103
Prepaids2,336 1,766 
Property and equipment depreciation
 1,238
Property and equipment depreciation4,600 3,404 
Goodwill and intangibles amortization5,809
 9,568
Goodwill and intangibles amortization66,781 5,312 
Equity investment42,113
 59,244
Equity investment38,400 32,774 
Other205
 203
49,605
 72,510
Net deferred tax liabilities(10,593) (29,040)
Total deferred tax liabilities Total deferred tax liabilities112,117 43,256 
Deferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assetsDeferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assets(89,919)(20,323)
Less valuation allowance(26,402) (27,423)Less valuation allowance(2,276)(2,584)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(36,995) $(56,463)Net deferred tax liabilities$(92,195)$(22,907)
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance of $26,402 and $27,423 for 2017 and 2016, respectively4,632
 1,510
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net of valuation allowance of $0 and $0 for 2017 and 2016, respectively(41,627) (57,973)
$(36,995) $(56,463)
 
At December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had no0 federal or state net operating loss carryforwards. The Company had net operating(“NOL”) carryforwards and approximately $19,642 of state NOL carryforwards which expire as follows (in thousands):

2026$485 
2027 and thereafter19,157 
Total state net operating loss carryforwards$19,642 

Approximately $4.1 million of the state NOL carryforwards relate to Circulation's pre-acquisition tax periods and are subject to change of ownership limitations on their use. These limitations are not expected to restrict the ultimate use of these loss carryforwards in the following countries which can be carried forward indefinitely:carryforwards.
  
Australia$41,256
Canada728
France3,882
Saudi Arabia82
UK40,090
Realization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards is dependent on reversing taxable temporary differences and on generating sufficient taxable income.Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized, to the extent they are not covered by a valuation allowance. The amount of the deferred tax assetassets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
 
The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 20172020 was negative $1,021,a decrease of $0.3 million, of which positive $2,299$0.5 million related to a decrease from current operations, $0.4 million related to a decrease from discontinued operations and negative $3,320$0.6 million related to the adjustmentbalance from the Simplura acquisition. The valuation allowance of the beginning balance. The valuation


allowance$2.3 million includes $25,929 primarilyamounts for Australia, Francestate NOLs, capital loss and UK net operating loss carryforwards, and $473 for state tax credit carryforwards for which the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will not be realized in the ordinary course of operations. The Company will continue to assess the valuation allowance, and to the extent it is determined that the valuation allowance should be changed, an appropriate adjustment will be recorded.




106


U.S. Tax Reform


On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Act was enacted which institutes fundamental changes to the taxation of multinational corporations. The Tax Reform Act includes changes to the taxation of foreign earnings by implementing a dividend exemption system, expansion of the current anti-deferral rules, a minimum tax on low-taxed foreign earnings and new measures to deter base erosion. The Tax Reform Act also includes a permanent reduction in the corporate tax rate to 21%, repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax, expensing of capital investment, and limitation of the deduction for interest expense. Furthermore, as part of the transition to the new tax system, a one-time transition tax is imposed on a U.S. shareholder’s historical undistributed earnings and profits (“E&P”) of foreign affiliates. Although the Tax Reform Act is generally effective January 1, 2018, GAAP requires recognition of the tax effects of new legislation during the reporting period that includes the enactment date, which was December 22, 2017.


As a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional tax benefit of $19,397.$21.0 million. The Company has projected net accumulated deficits in foreign E&P; therefore, no provisional tax expense for deemed repatriation has beenwas recognized. For any future foreign earnings, the Company will generally be free of additional U.S. tax consequences due to a dividends received deduction implemented as part of the move to a territorial tax system for foreign subsidiary earnings. The Company continues to assert indefinite reinvestment in outside basis differences. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on outside basis differences is not practicable because of the complexity of laws and regulations, the varying tax treatment of alternative repatriation scenarios, and the variation due to multiple potential assumptions relating to the timing of any future repatriation.

The global intangible low taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Reform Act require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary’s tangible assets. The Company may be subject to incremental U.S. tax on GILTI income beginning in 2018, and has elected to account for GILTI tax in the period in which it is incurred. Therefore, no deferred tax impacts of GILTI have been considered in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with the SAB 118 guidance, the Company has recognized the provisional tax impacts related to the benefit for the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The final impact of the Tax Reform Act may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, issuance of additional regulatory guidance, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, and actions the Company may take as a result of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the financial reporting impact of the Tax Reform Act will bewas completed in the fourth quarter of 2018.2018 and an additional benefit of $0.3 million was recorded.


CARES ACT

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES” Act) was enacted into law.The CARES Act includes several significant business tax provisions that, among other things, would allow businesses to carry back NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to the five prior years, accelerate refunds of previously generated corporate alternative minimum tax credits, and generally loosen the business interest limitation imposed by the Tax Reform Act.

Pursuant to the CARES Act, the Company carried its 2018 NOL back five years.As a result, the Company recorded a $27.3 million receivable for the 2018 U.S. NOL carryback, and a $11.0 million tax benefit from the favorable carryback tax rate of 35% compared to a carryforward tax rate of 21%.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company has received $17.0 million of the $27.3 million receivable for the 2018 U.S. NOL carryback.It is anticipated that the remaining $10.3 million refund will be received in the first quarter of 2021.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
  
The Company expects no material amountInternal Revenue Service is currently auditing our consolidated U.S. income tax returns for 2015-2018 due to the large refunds (total of $47.6 million from capital loss and NOL carrybacks) received from the unrecognizedloss on the WD Services sale. In addition, we are being examined by various states and by the Saudi Arabian tax benefits to be recognized during the next twelve months. authorities. All known adjustments have been fully reserved.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the Company recognized approximately $65, $19$0.1 million, $0.1 million and $27,$0.1 million, respectively, in interest and penalties.penalties from continuing operations. The Company had approximately $83$0.2 million and $52$0.2 million, for the payment of penalties and interest of continuing operations accrued as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.




A reconciliation of the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits for continuing operations is as follows:follows (in thousands):
 
107


December 31, December 31,
2017 2016 2015 202020192018
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$1,108
 $271
 $347
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$1,403 $1,222 $1,115 
Balance upon acquisition/disposition
 764
 
Increase (decrease) related to prior year positions22
 37
 (47)
Increase related to prior year tax positionsIncrease related to prior year tax positions133 104 
Increase related to current year tax positions101
 139
 48
Increase related to current year tax positions116 128 160 
Statute of limitations expiration(116) (103) (77)Statute of limitations expiration(80)(157)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$1,115
 $1,108
 $271
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$1,519 $1,403 $1,222 
 
The entire ending balance in unrecognized tax benefits of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2020 would reduce tax expense and our effective tax rate. The Company expects no material amount of the unrecognized tax benefits to be recognized during the next twelve months.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various foreign and state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations is generally three years for the U.S., two to five years in foreign countries and between three and four years for the various states in which the Company operates. The Company is subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: the U.S., UK, Australia, France, Saudi Arabia and Korea. The tax years that remain open for examination by the U.S. and various foreign countries and states principally include the years 20132015 to 2017.2019.


108
18.


22.    Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal proceedings
 
On June 15, 2015, a putative stockholder class action derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”), captioned Haverhill Retirement System v. Kerley et al., C.A. No. 11149-VCL (the “Haverhill Litigation”). The complaint named Richard A. Kerley, Kristi L. Meints, Warren S. Rustand, Christopher Shackelton (the “Individual Defendants”) and Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (“Coliseum Capital Management”) as defendants, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint purported to allege that the dividend rate increase term originally in the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock was an impermissibly coercive measure that impaired the voting rights of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the vote on the removal of certain voting and conversion caps previously applicable to the Preferred Stock (the “Caps”), and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by approving the dividend rate increase term and attempting to coerce the stockholder vote relating to the Company’s Preferred Stock, and by failing to disclose all material information necessary to allow the Company’s stockholders to cast an informed vote on the Caps. The complaint also purported to allege derivative claims alleging that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by entering into the subordinated note and standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and granting Coliseum Capital Management certain stock options. The complaint further alleged that Coliseum Capital Management aided and abetted the Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The complaint sought, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the stockholder vote relating to the dividend rate increase, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
On August 31, 2015, after arms’ length negotiations, the parties reached an agreement in principle and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) providing for the settlement of claims concerning the dividend rate increase term and stockholder vote and related disclosure. The MOU stated that the Defendants had entered into the partial settlement of the litigation solely to eliminate the distraction, burden, expense, and potential delay of further litigation involving claims that have been settled. Pursuant to the partial settlement, the Company agreed to supplement the disclosures in its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “2015 Proxy Statement”), Coliseum Capital Management and certain of its affiliates and the Company entered into an amendment to that certain Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement, by and among Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, and The Providence Service Corporation dated as of February 11, 2015 described in the 2015 Proxy Statement, and the Board of the Company agreed to adopt a policy related to the Board’s determination each quarter as to whether the Company should pay cash dividends or allow dividends to be paid in the form of PIK dividends on the Preferred Stock, as further described in the supplemental proxy disclosures. On September 2, 2015, Providence issued supplemental disclosures through a supplement to the 2015 Proxy Statement. On September 16, 2015, Providence stockholders approved the removal of the Caps. The Company provided notice of the proposed partial settlement to Providence’s stockholders by December 11, 2015. At a hearing on February 9, 2016, the court denied approval of the settlement. The Court indicated that plaintiff’s counsel could petition the Court for a mootness fee, and that defendants would have the opportunity to oppose any such application.
On January 12, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified amended class action and derivative complaint (the “first amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the first amended complaint named David Shackelton,


Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. (collectively, and together with Coliseum Capital Management, LLC, “Coliseum”) and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital Markets”) as additional defendants. The first amended complaint purported to allege direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty against some or all of the Individual Defendants and David Shackelton (collectively, the “Amended Individual Defendants”) regarding the approval of the subordinated note, the rights offering, the standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and the grant to Coliseum Capital Management of certain stock options. The first amended complaint also purported to allege an additional derivative claim for unjust enrichment against Coliseum and further alleged that Coliseum and RBC Capital Markets aided and abetted the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The first amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.

On May 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified second amended class action and derivative complaint (the “second amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the second amended complaint named Paul Hastings LLP (“Paul Hastings”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as additional defendants. In addition to previously asserted claims, the second amended complaint purported to assert direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duties against Coliseum Capital Management, in its capacity as the controlling stockholder of the Company, in connection with the subordinated note, the Company’s rights offering of Preferred Stock and the standby purchase agreement with Coliseum Capital Management (the “Financing Transactions”). The second amended complaint also alleged that Paul Hastings breached their fiduciary duties as counsel to the Company in connection with the Financing Transactions and that BofA and Paul Hastings aided and abetted certain of the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties in connection with the Financing Transactions. The second amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, disgorgement of fees paid to RBC Capital Markets, Paul Hastings and BofA for work relating to the Financing Transactions, unspecified damages and other relief.

On May 20, 2016, the Court granted a six-month stay of the proceeding (which was subsequently extended) to allow a special litigation committee, created by the Board, sufficient time to investigate, review and evaluate the facts, circumstances and claims asserted in or relating to this action and determine the Company’s response thereto. On January 20, 2017, the special litigation committee advised the Court that the parties to the litigation and the special litigation committee had reached an agreement in principle to settle all of the claims in the litigation. The parties then entered into a proposed settlement agreement which was submitted to the Court for approval. On September 28, 2017, the Court approved the proposed settlement agreement among the parties that provided for a settlement amount of $10,000 less plaintiff’s legal fees and expenses (the “Settlement Amount”), with 75% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to the Company and 25% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to holders of the Company’s Common Stock other than certain excluded parties. In November 2017, the Company received a payment of $5,363 from the Settlement Amount, which is included in “Other income” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.

In addition to the matter described above, in the ordinary course of business, the Company is a party to various lawsuits. Management does not expect these lawsuits to have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Providence.the Company.


Indemnifications related to Haverhill Litigation
The Company indemnifiedOn January 21, 2019, the Standby Purchasers from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities relating to or arising out of (i) any breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or undertaking made by or on behalf of the Company in the Standby Purchase Agreement and (ii) the transactions contemplated by the Standby Purchase Agreement and the 14.0% Unsecured Subordinated Note in aggregate principal amount of $65,500, except to the extent that any such losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities are attributable to the gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud of such Standby Purchaser.
The Company has also indemnified other third parties from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities arising out of or in connection with the Company’s acquisition of CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. (operating under the tradename Matrix, and formerly included in our HA Services segment) in October 2014 and related financing commitments, except to the extent that any such losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities are found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct of such third parties, or a material breach of such third parties’ obligations under the related agreements.
The Company recorded $318, $1,282 and $310 of such indemnified legal expenses related to the Haverhill Litigation during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income. Of these amounts, $245, $757 and $310 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016


and 2015, respectively, were indemnified legal expenses of related parties. Other legal expenses of the Company related to the Haverhill Litigation are covered under the Company’s insurance policies, subject to applicable deductibles and customary review of the expenses by the carrier. The Company recognized expense of $8, $210 and $500 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. While the carrier typically remits payment directly to the respective law firm, the Company accrues for the cost and records a corresponding receivable for the amount to be paid by the carrier. The Company has recognized an insurance receivable of $941 and $1,645 in “Other receivables” in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with a corresponding liability amount recorded to “Accrued expenses”.

Other Indemnifications
The Company has provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with the sale of the Human Services segment to Molina Healthcare Inc. (“Molina”) effective November 1, 2015. All representations and warranties made by the Company in the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to sell the Human Services segment ended on February 1, 2017. However, claims made prior to February 1, 2017 by the purchaser of the Human Services segment against these representations and warranties may survive until the claims are settled. In addition, certain representations, including tax representations, survive until the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation, and healthcare representations survive until the third anniversary of the closing date. The Company has received indications from the purchaser of the Human Services segment regarding potential indemnification claims. One potential indemnification claim relates to Rodriguez v. Providence Community Corrections (the “Rodriguez Litigation”), a complaint filed in theUnited States District Court for the MiddleSouthern District of Tennessee, Nashville DivisionOhio unsealed a qui tam complaint, filed in December 2015, against Mobile Care Group, Inc., Mobile Care Group of Ohio, LLC, Mobile Care EMS & Transport, Inc. and LogistiCare Solutions, LLC (“LogistiCare”) by Brandee White, Laura Cunningham, and Jeffery Wisier (the “Rodriquez Court”“Relators”), against Providence Community Corrections, Inc. (“PCC”), an entity sold alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act by presenting claims for payment to government healthcare programs knowing that the prerequisites for such claims to be paid had not been met. The Relators seek to recover damages, fees and costs under the Purchase Agreement. On September 18, 2017,federal False Claims Act including treble damages, civil penalties and attorneys’ fees. In addition, the plaintiffs inRelators seek reinstatement to their jobs with the Rodriguez Litigation filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement, pursuant to which PCC would pay $14,000 to the plaintiffs and $350 to co-defendant Rutherford County, Tennessee. On October 5, 2017, the Rodriguez Court denied preliminary approvalMobile Care entities. None of the settlement and requested additional information. On October 18, 2017,Relators were employed by LogistiCare. Prior to January 21, 2019, LogistiCare had no knowledge of the plaintiffscomplaint. The federal government has declined to intervene against LogistiCare. The Company filed a second unopposed motion for approval ofto dismiss the proposed settlement. On January 2, 2018, the Rodriguez Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlementComplaint on April 22, 2019, and authorized notice to class members. 
On September 15, 2017, Molina and the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding; and on March 1, 2018, Molina and the Company entered into a settlement agreement, regarding a settlement of an indemnification claim by Molina with respect to the Rodriguez Litigation and other matters. As of December 31, 2017, the accrual is $15,000 with respect to an estimate of loss for potential indemnification claims. The Company expects to recover a portion of the settlement through insurance coverage, although this cannot be assured.
Litigation is inherently uncertain and the actual losses incurred in the eventbelieves that the related legal proceedings were to result in unfavorable outcomes couldcase will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’sits business, and financial performance.condition or results of operations.


In 2017, a subsidiary of newly acquired Simplura Health Group, All Metro Home Care Services of New York, Inc. d/b/a All Metro Health Care (“All Metro”), received a class action lawsuit claiming that, among other things, it failed to pay live-in caregivers, who stay in patients’ homes for 24 hours per day (“live-ins”). The Company currently pays live-ins for 13 hours as supported through a written opinion letter from the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”). A similar case involving this issue has providedbeen heard by the New York Court of Appeals (New York’s highest court), which on March 26, 2019, issued a ruling reversing earlier lower courts’ decisions that an employer must pay live-ins for 24 hours. The Court of Appeals agreed with the NYSDOL’s interpretation to pay live-ins 13 hours instead of 24 hours if certain standard indemnifications in connection with its Matrix stock subscription transaction whereby Mercury Fortuna Buyer, LLC (“Subscriber”), Providenceconditions were being met. If the class action lawsuit on this matter is allowed to proceed, and Matrixis successful, the Company may be liable for back wages and litigated damages going back to November 2011.

Significant Lease Not Yet Commenced

In August 2020, the Company entered into a stock subscriptionan 11-1/2 year operating lease agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”), dated August 28, 2016.for new corporate office space in Denver,     Colorado. The representations and warranties made bylease is expected to commence when construction of the Companyasset is completed in the Subscription Agreement ended January 19, 2018; however, certain fundamental representations survive throughsecond quarter of 2021. Total estimated base rent payments over the 36th month following the closing date.  The covenants and agreementslife of the parties to be performed prior to the closing ended January 19, 2018, and all other covenants and agreements survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations in the event of a breach, or for such lesser periods specified therein. The Company is not aware of any indemnification liabilities with respect to Matrix that require accrual at December 31, 2017.lease are approximately $29.7 million
Other Contingencies
On January 25, 2018, the UK Ministry of Justice (the “MOJ”) released a report on reoffending statistics for certain offenders who entered probation services during the period October 2015 to March 2016. The report provides statistics for all providers of probation services, including our subsidiary RRP, which is in our WD Services segment. This information is the second data set that is utilized to determine performance payments under the various providers’ transforming rehabilitation contracts with the MOJ, as the actual rates of recidivism are compared to benchmark rates established by the MOJ. Performance payments and penalties are linked to two separate measures of recidivism - the binary measure and the frequency measure. The binary measure defines the percentage of offenders within a cohort, formed quarterly, who reoffend in the following 12 months. The frequency measure defines the average number of offenses committed by reoffenders within the same 12-month measurement period. The performance for the frequency measure for most providers has been below the benchmarks established by the MOJ. As a result, RRP could be required to make payments to the MOJ and the amounts of such payments could be material. The amount of potential payments to the MOJ, if any, under RRP’s contracts with the MOJ cannot be estimated at this time, as the MOJ is


reviewing the data to understand the underlying reasons for the increase in certain rates of recidivism and other factors that could impact the contractual measure.
Deferred Compensation Plan
 
The Company has one deferred compensation plan for management and highly compensated employees of NETNEMT Services as of December 31, 2017.2020. The deferred compensation plan is unfunded, and benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company. The total of participant deferrals, which is reflected in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets, was $1,806$2.6 million and $1,430$2.3 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
 
19.23.    Transactions with Related Parties

The Company incurred legal expenses under an indemnification agreement with the Standby Purchasers as furtherAs discussed in Note 18, Commitments16, Stock-Based Compensation and Contingencies.Similar Arrangements, on June 8, 2020, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Conversion Agreement with Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P. and certain funds and accounts managed by Coliseum Capital Management, LLC. Pursuant to the Conversion Agreement, the Company purchased 369,120 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, in exchange for $209.88 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock, plus a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through the day prior to June 11, 2020. Further, the Holders converted 369,120 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 925,567 shares of common stock, a cash payment equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series A Preferred Stock through June 11, 2020, and a cash payment of $8.82 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The amount of accrued dividends paid pursuant to the Conversion Agreement was equal to $0.8 million.

Further, on September 3, 2020, the Company elected to affect the conversion (the “Conversion”) of all of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. In accordance with the Preferred Stock Conversion Agreement dated June 8, 2020 (as amended), immediately prior to the Conversion, the Company repurchased 27,509 shares of Series A Preferred Stock from the Holders for a cash amount equal to $209.88 per share of Series A Preferred Stock and a cash amount equal to accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares through the day prior to the Conversion.

109


Convertible preferred stock dividends earned by the Standby PurchasersColiseum Stockholders during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 totaled $4,213 each year. $2.0 million and $4.2 million respectively, including accrued dividends paid pursuant to the Conversion Agreement.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company made a $566 loan to Mission Providence. The loan was also repaid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

20.24.   Discontinued Operations
 
Effective October 19, 2016,WD Services Segment

On December 21, 2018, the Company completed the Matrix Transaction. Atsale of substantially all of the closing, (i)operating subsidiaries of its WD Services segment to APM and APM UK Holdings Limited, an affiliate of APM, except for the segment’s employment services operations in Saudi Arabia. The Company’s contractual counterparties in Saudi Arabia, including an entity owned by the Saudi Arabian government, assumed these operations beginning January 1, 2019.

The total cash consideration of $180,614the sale was paid by$46.5 million, with the Subscriber to Matrix based upon an enterprise valuebuyer retaining existing WD Services cash of $537,500 and (ii) Matrix borrowed approximately $198,000 pursuant to a credit and guaranty agreement providing for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $198,000 and revolving loan commitments in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10,000, which was not drawn at the closing. At the closing, Matrix distributed $381,163 to Providence, in full satisfaction of a promissory note and accumulated interest between Matrix and Providence. At the closing, Providence made a $5,663 capital contribution to Matrix, as described in the Subscription Agreement, as amended, based upon its pro-rata ownership of Matrix, to fund the near-term cash needs of Matrix. On the day that was fifteen days following the closing date, Providence was,$21.0 million. In addition to the extent payable pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, as amended, entitled to receive from Matrix, or required to pay to Matrix, subsequent working capital adjustment payments. Providence received an initial payment of $5,172 from Matrix in November 2016 which is net of the capital contribution of $5,663 described above, based upon the initial working capital calculation as described in the Subscription Agreement. Additionally, in February 2017,purchase consideration, the Company receivedexpects to realize cash tax benefits of approximately $63.8 million from the transaction (considering CARES Act impact), of which $52.1 million ($48.6 million of refunds and $3.5 million of avoided payments) have been realized as of December 31, 2020. The remaining cash tax benefit of $11.7 million is expected to be realized as refunds and offsets to tax payments over the next year. In addition, $0.9 million of benefits related to capital loss carryforwards is available, which amount was reserved as of December 31, 2020.

On June 11, 2018, the Company entered into a $75 payment from Matrix representingShare Purchase Agreement to sell the final working capital adjustment payment.shares of Ingeus France, its WD Services operation in France, for a de minimis amount. The sale was effective on July 17, 2018, after court approval.

In accordance with ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements-Discontinued Operations, (“ASC 205-20”) a component of an entity is reported in discontinued operations after meeting the criteria for held for saleheld-for-sale classification if the disposition represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity'sentity’s operations and financial results. The Company analyzed the quantitative and qualitative factors relevant to the Matrix stock subscription transaction resulting indisposition of the Company no longer owning a controlling interest in Matrix,WD Services segment and determined that those held for sale conditions for discontinued operations presentation were met during the thirdfourth quarter of 2016.2018. As such, the historical financial results of Matrix, the Company’s historical HAWD Services segment, and the related income tax effects have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements through October 19, 2016.statements.





110


Results of Operations
 
The Company has continuing involvement with Matrix through its ownershipfollowing table summarizes the results of 46.6% of the equity interests in Matrixoperations classified as of December 31, 2017, as well as through a management consulting agreement, not to exceed ten years. Priorincome (loss) from discontinued operations related to the Matrix Transaction, the Company owned 100%WD services segment, net of the equity interest in Matrix. Subsequent to the Matrix Transaction, the Company accounts for its investment in Matrix under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s share of Matrix’s losses subsequent to the Matrix Transaction, which totaled $13,445 and $1,789, is recorded as “Equity in net (gain) loss of investees” in its consolidated statement of incometax, for the years ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016, respectively. Matrix’s pretax2018 (in thousands).

 Year ended December 31,
 202020192018
Service revenue, net$$$264,553 
Operating expenses:
Service expense248,824 
General and administrative (income) expense1,116 (2,652)26,400 
Asset impairment charge9,203 
Depreciation and amortization11,864 
Total operating (benefit) expenses1,116 (2,652)296,291 
Operating income (loss)(1,116)2,652 (31,738)
Other expenses:
Interest expense, net35 
Gain on foreign currency transactions(388)
Other gain(87)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before loss on disposition and income taxes(1,116)2,652 (31,298)
Loss on disposition(53,692)
(Provision) benefit for income taxes338 (2,734)47,937 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(778)$(82)$(37,053)

The loss on disposition in the table above includes the reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of subsidiaries of $30.0 million. The benefit for income taxes in the table above for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $2,948WD Services segment includes tax benefits on the WD Services Sale of $51.9 million (original estimate before CARES Act impact) and includes $3,537income tax expense on WD Services operations of transaction related expenses. Matrix’s pretax loss$3.4 million.

Asset impairment charges

In connection with classifying the assets and liabilities of Ingeus France as held for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2016 totaled $7,027 and includes $6,367 of transaction related expenses. There have been no cash inflows or outflows from or to Matrix subsequent to the closing of the Matrix Transaction, other than the working capital adjustments discussed above and management fees associated with its ongoing relationship with Matrix, of which $1,103 was receivedsale during the year ended December 31, 2017. $2472018, the carrying value of the assets and $185 areliabilities was reduced to its estimated fair value less selling costs. As a result, an impairment charge of $9.2 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 and is included in “Other receivables”“Asset impairment charge” in the table above.

Loss on disposition, net of tax

The total loss on disposition, net of tax, related to the sale of WD Services subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2018 is calculated as follows (in thousands):

Total cash received, net of transaction costs and cash sold$12,780 
Total WD Services net asset value as of transaction date, net of cash sold(36,499)
Income tax benefit (original estimate before CARES Act impact)51,861 
Gain on sale before reclassification of currency translation, net of tax28,142 
Adjustment for reclassification of currency translation(29,973)
Loss on disposition, net of tax$(1,831)

111


Assets and liabilities

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets atas of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively, related to management fees receivable.2019. Amounts represent the accounts of WD Services operations in Saudi Arabia, which were not sold as part of the WD Services Sale.

 December 31,
 20202019
Cash and cash equivalents$302 $155 
Prepaid expenses and other456 
Current assets of discontinued operations$758 $155 
Accounts payable$$17 
Accrued expenses1,971 1,414 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations$1,971 $1,431 

Human Services Segment

On September 3, 2015, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell all of the membership interests in Providence Human Services, LLC and Providence Community Services, LLC, comprising the


Company’s Human Services segment, in exchange for cash proceedssegment. On November 1, 2015, the Company completed the sale of approximately $200,000 prior to adjustments for estimated working capital, certain seller transaction costs, debt assumed by the buyer, and a $20,099 cash payment received for the Providenceits Human Services cash and cash equivalents on hand at closing. The net proceeds were $230,703, although $10,000 is held in an indemnity escrow and recorded within “Prepaid expenses and other” in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017. Proceeds include a customary working capital adjustment of $13,246.segment. During the years ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, the Company recorded additional expenses related to the Human Services segment, principally related to previously disclosed legal proceedings as described in Note 18, Commitment and Contingences, related to an indemnified legal matter.

Results of Operations
The following table summarizes the results of operations classified as discontinued operations, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The HA Services segment column in the table below forproceedings. For the year ended December 31, 2016 reflects2017, the financial results for HA Services from January 1, 2016 through October 19, 2016.
 Year ended December 31, 2017
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Operating expenses:     
General and administrative expense$9,674
 $
 $9,674
Total operating expenses9,674
 
 9,674
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes(9,674) 
 (9,674)
Income tax benefit3,691
 
 3,691
Discontinued operations, net of tax$(5,983) $
 $(5,983)

 Year ended December 31, 2016
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Service revenue, net$
 $166,090
 $166,090
      
Operating expenses:     
Service expense
 120,906
 120,906
General and administrative expense7,966
 2,148
 10,114
Depreciation and amortization
 21,121
 21,121
Total operating expenses7,966
 144,175
 152,141
Operating income (loss)(7,966) 21,915
 13,949
      
Other expenses:     
Write-off of deferred financing fees
 2,302
 2,302
Interest expense, net
 9,929
 9,929
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before gain on disposition and income taxes(7,966) 9,684
 1,718
Gain on disposition
 167,895
 167,895
(Provision) benefit for income taxes2,401
 (63,254) (60,853)
Discontinued operations, net of tax$(5,565) $114,325
 $108,760


 Year ended December 31, 2015
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Service revenue, net$291,510
 $217,436
 $508,946
      
Operating expenses:     
Service expense264,293
 163,211
 427,504
General and administrative expense14,975
 2,630
 17,605
Asset impairment charge1,593
 
 1,593
Depreciation and amortization4,831
 29,472
 34,303
Total operating expenses285,692
 195,313
 481,005
Operating income5,818
 22,123
 27,941
      
Other expenses:     
Interest expense, net2,829
 14,359
 17,188
Income from discontinued operations before gain on disposition and income taxes2,989
 7,764
 10,753
Gain on disposition123,129
 
 123,129
Provision for income taxes(24,318) (1,693) (26,011)
Discontinued operations, net of tax$101,800
 $6,071
 $107,871

Interest expense, net
The Company allocated interest expense, including amortizationpaid a legal settlement of deferred financing fees, to discontinued operations based on$9.7 million, which was the portiononly activity in the year, generating a loss of the debt thatsame amount, and reported a benefit for income taxes related to this loss of $3.7 million. In 2018 there was requiredimmaterial activity at this segment related to be paid with the proceedsoutstanding legal fees from the salesettlement, in the amount of $0.5 million. In 2019, the Company received a settlement from an insurance agency to partially offset the loss from 2017, in the amount of $6.9 million, and reported a provision for income taxes related to this settlement of $0.9 million. There has been no further activity for the Human Services Segment and there are no assets or liabilities on the balance sheet of the Company related to this segment and the Matrix Transaction. The total allocated interest expense is included in “Interest expense, net” in the tables above. The total allocated interest expense for the years endedas of December 31, 20162020 and 2015 is as follows:2019.
 
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Human Services Segment$
 $2,871
HA Services Segment9,939
 14,376
Total$9,939
 $17,247




Cash Flow Information
The following table presents depreciation, amortization, capital expenditures and significant operating noncash items of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 For the year ended December 31, 2016
 
Human
Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total
Discontinued
Operations
      
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:     
Depreciation$
 $3,661
 $3,661
Amortization
 17,460
 17,460
Stock-based compensation
 (18) (18)
Deferred income taxes
 52,338
 52,338
      
Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:     
Purchase of property and equipment$
 $9,174
 $9,174
 For the year ended December 31, 2015
 
Human
Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total
Discontinued
Operations
      
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:     
Depreciation$2,376
 $3,370
 $5,746
Amortization2,455
 26,102
 28,557
Asset impairment charge1,593
 
 1,593
Stock-based compensation7
 108
 115
Deferred income taxes(5,680) 730
 (4,950)
      
Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:     
Purchase of property and equipment$2,224
 $8,079
 $10,303
21.    Segments
The Providence Service Corporation owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged in the provision of healthcare services in the United States and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which the Company holds interests comprise the following segments:

NET Services – Nationwide manager of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments and managed care organizations.
WD Services – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – Minority interest in Matrix, a nationwide provider of in-home care optimization and management solutions, including CHAs, to members of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment as a result of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016, which is further discussed in Note 20, Discontinued Operations



In addition to its segments’ operations, the Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions, and the Company’s captive insurance company.
Segment results are based on how the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) manages the Company’s business, makes operating decisions and evaluates operating performance. The operating results of the segments include revenue and expenses incurred by the segment, as well as an allocation of direct expenses incurred by Corporate on behalf of the segment. Indirect expenses, including unallocated corporate functions and expenses, such as executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions and the results of the Company's captive insurance company as well as elimination entries recorded in consolidation are reflected in Corporate and Other.

The following table sets forth certain financial information from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s business segments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 NET Services WD Services 
Matrix
Investment
 
Corporate and
Other
 Total
Service revenue, net$1,318,220
 $305,662
 $
 $
 $1,623,882
Service expense1,227,426
 265,417
 
 (3,799) 1,489,044
General and administrative expense11,779
 25,438
 
 35,119
 72,336
Depreciation and amortization13,275
 12,851
 
 343
 26,469
Operating income (loss)$65,740
 $1,956
 $
 $(31,663) $36,033
          
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $1,391
 $(13,445) $
 $(12,054)
Investment in equity method investee$
 $213
 $169,699
 $
 $169,912
Total assets$294,127
 $184,805
 $169,699
 $55,459
 $704,090
Long-lived asset expenditures$15,319
 $4,527
 $
 $77
 $19,923
 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 NET Services WD Services Matrix Investment Corporate and Other Total
Service revenue, net$1,233,720
 $344,403
 $
 $122
 $1,578,245
Service expense1,132,857
 320,147
 
 (894) 1,452,110
General and administrative expense11,406
 30,300
 
 28,205
 69,911
Asset impairment charge
 19,588
 
 1,415
 21,003
Depreciation and amortization12,375
 13,824
 
 405
 26,604
Operating income (loss)$77,082
 $(39,456) $
 $(29,009) $8,617
          
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $8,498
 $1,789
 $
 $10,287
Investment in equity method investee$
 $4,161
 $157,202
 $
 $161,363
Total assets$313,371
 $160,152
 $157,202
 $54,554
 $685,279
Long-lived asset expenditures$10,845
 $19,810
 $
 $1,387
 $32,042



 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 NET Services WD Services Corporate and Other Total
Service revenue, net$1,083,015
 $395,059
 $(64) $1,478,010
Service expense991,659
 393,803
 (4,308) 1,381,154
General and administrative expense10,704
 29,846
 30,436
 70,986
Depreciation and amortization9,429
 13,776
 793
 23,998
Operating income (loss)$71,223
 $(42,366) $(26,985) $1,872
        
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $10,970
 $
 $10,970
Long-lived asset expenditures$12,232
 $11,869
 $668
 $24,769
Geographic Information
The following table details the Company’s revenue from continuing operations and long-lived assets by geographic location.
 For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,335,389
 $187,655
 $100,838
 $1,623,882
Long-lived assets (a)37,700
 9,354
 3,323
 50,377
 For the year ended December 31, 2016
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,250,043
 $235,061
 $93,141
 $1,578,245
Long-lived assets (a)32,007
 9,823
 4,390
 46,220
 For the year ended December 31, 2015
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,099,918
 $298,386
 $79,706
 $1,478,010
(a)Represents property and equipment, net.

Domestic service revenue, net, totaled 82.2%, 79.2% and 74.4% of service revenue, net for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Foreign service revenue, net, totaled 17.8%, 20.8% and 25.6% of service revenue, net for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At December 31, 2017, $99,071 of the Company’s net assets from continuing operations were located in countries outside of the U.S. At December 31, 2016, $76,579 of the Company’s net assets from continuing operations were located in countries outside of the U.S.
Customer Information
11.2%, 10.2% and 11.0% of the Company’s consolidated revenue was derived from one U.S. state Medicaid program for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 10.7% of the Company’s consolidated revenue was derived from one UK governmental agency for the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s revenues are generated from domestic and foreign governmental agencies or entities that contract with governmental agencies.



22.25.    Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
 
The quarterly consolidated financial statements presented below reflect HAWD Services and Human Services as discontinued operations for all periods presented.presented (in thousands):
 Quarter ended
March 31,
2020
June 30, 2020September 30,
2020
December 31,
2020
(1)(2)
Service revenue, net$367,291 $282,256 $320,619 $398,509 
Operating income10,045 48,843 43,334 20,936 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax16,300 37,299 38,920 (2,905)
(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(202)(301)(115)(160)
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCare16,098 36,998 38,805 (3,065)
Earnings (loss) per common share (Note 18):    
Basic$1.00 $(0.98)$2.52 $(0.22)
Diluted$1.00 $(0.98)$2.52 $(0.22)

 Quarter ended
 March 31,
2017 (1)
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017 (2)
 December 31,
2017 (3)(4)(5)
        
Service revenue, net$399,494
 $407,983
 $409,517
 $406,888
Operating Income6,788
 5,999
 6,309
 16,937
Income from continuing operations, net of tax1,915
 3,858
 14,964
 39,066
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,866) (117) (16) 16
Net income (loss) attributable to Providence(4,325) 3,915
 14,853
 38,926
Earnings (loss) per common share (10):       
Basic$(0.40) $0.18
 $0.88
 $2.43
Diluted$(0.40) $0.18
 $0.88
 $2.41
(1)The Company acquired National MedTrans, LLC, (NMT) in an all cash asset acquisition in Q2 of 2020. See further discussion at Note 3. Acquisitions.

 Quarter ended
 March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016 (6)
 December 31,
2016 (7)(8)(9)
        
Service revenue, net$382,036
 $398,119
 $412,271
 $385,819
Operating Income (loss)8,304
 6,712
 9,793
 (16,192)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax1,376
 1,624
 3,743
 (25,657)
Discontinued operations, net of tax753
 2,370
 (2,791) 108,428
Net income attributable to Providence2,235
 4,623
 650
 84,420
Earnings (loss) per common share (10):       
Basic$0.07
 $0.21
 $(0.05) $4.92
Diluted$0.07
 $0.21
 $(0.05) $4.92

(1)The Company recorded expenses, net of tax, of $5,866 in Discontinued operations, net of tax, in the quarter ending March 31, 2017 related to the Company’s former Human Services segment, which are principally related to an ongoing legal matter. 

(2)The Company recorded a gain on sale of equity investment of $12,606, net of tax, related to the sale of its equity interest in Mission Providence during the quarter ended September 30, 2017. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a reduction to the gain on sale of $229, related to the finalization of the working capital adjustment per the sale agreement.

(3)Operating income for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 increased as compared to the prior quarters in 2017 as a result of a decrease in service expense as a percentage of revenue for NET Services and WD Services. This was primarily a result of lower operating costs of both segments as well as certain NET Services contractual adjustments recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017.

(4)The quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes the receipt of the Haverhill Litigation settlement of $5,363.

(5)The quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes a net tax benefit of $16,017 related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act during the fourth quarter of 2017, due to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities by Providence as a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate. Providence realized a tax benefit of $19,397, partially offset by $3,379 of increased tax expense resulting from additional equity in net gain of Matrix, due to Matrix' re-


measurement of its deferred tax liabilities. The equity in net gain from Matrix for the quarter ended December 31, 2017(2)Q4 2020 includes a tax benefit of $13,610results related to Matrix's re-measurement of deferred tax liabilitiesthe Personal Care Segment, which was created as a result of the Tax Reform Act.

(6)The Company recorded expenses, net of tax, of $5,035 in Discontinued operations, net of tax, in the quarter ended September 30, 2016 related to the Company’s former Human Services segment, which are principally related to an ongoing legal matter. 

(7)Service revenue, net for the quarter ending December 31, 2016 decreased from the quarter ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreased revenue associated with the WD Services’ National Citizen Service summer youth programs, which are seasonal in nature. Additionally, the quarter ended September 30, 2016 included revenue of $5,367 under the WD Services’ offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016.

(8)The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $1,415 related to the building and land utilized by the holding company, which was sold effective December 30, 2016. Also, the Company recorded asset impairment charges in its WD Services segment of $9,983, $4,381 and $5,224 to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively. 

(9)The quarter ended December 31, 2016 includes gain on loss of controlling interest in Matrix, net of tax, of $109,403.

(10)Earnings per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly earnings per share may not equal the total computed for the year.

23.    Subsequent Events

On February 16, 2018, Matrix acquired HealthFair, a leading provider of mobile health assessmentSimplura acquisition that closed on November 18, 2020. Service revenue includes $54.0 million and advanced diagnostic testing services for a purchase price of $160,000 plus an earnout payment contingent upon HealthFair's 2018 financial performance.  Additionally, Matrix entered into a financing transaction consisting of a $330,000 first lien term loan and a $20,000 revolving line of credit, of which none was drawn, and issued an aggregate of approximately 24,200,000 shares of its common unitsoperating income includes $4.1 million related to a seller roll-over contribution. As a resultthe Personal Care Segment for this quarter. See further discussion at Note 3. Acquisitions.
112




 Quarter ended
March 31,
2019
June 30, 2019September 30,
2019
December 31,
2019
(1)(2)
Service revenue, net$367,815 $363,911 $393,385 $384,833 
Operating income (loss)3,441 (3,250)16,987 7,554 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax1,314 (3,409)8,580 (11,438)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(732)1,697 (426)5,380 
Net income (loss) attributable to ModivCare582 (1,712)8,154 (6,058)
 Earnings (loss) per common share (Note 18):    
Basic$(0.04)$(0.22)$0.47 $(0.55)
Diluted$(0.04)$(0.22)$0.47 $(0.55)
(1)Operating income was positively impacted by retroactive rate changes.

(2)Loss from continuing operations, net of tax was negatively impacted by the rolloverCompany's investment in Matrix. Matrix recorded asset impairment of certain equity interests in HealthFair, Providence’s equity ownership is 43.6% as of February 16, 2018.

On November 2, 2017, the Company’s Board approved the extension of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizing$55.1 million for which the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69,640 (the amount remaining from the $100,000 repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. During the period January 1, 2018 to March 5, 2018, the Company repurchased 527,825 shares for $33,330, and $25,807 was available under the plan to repurchase shares.recorded its proportional share.



113




Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
 
None.
 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
The Company,Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of its management (including itsour principal executive officer and principal financial officer),officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (December 31, 2017)2020). Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officersofficer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2020, were effective to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions,officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is presented in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report and is hereby incorporated by reference.


We acquired Simplura on November 18, 2020, as discussed in Note 3, Acquisitions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As permitted by the SEC staff’s Frequently Asked Question 3 on Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports (revised September 24, 2007), our management excluded from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting effectiveness as of December 31, 2020, Simplura’s internal control over financial reporting associated with consolidated total assets of approximately 8% (excluding intangibles and goodwill brought on as a result of the transaction, as these balances were covered by our business combination controls), and consolidated total revenues of approximately 3.9%, included in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. We will include Simplura in our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, at which time and as permitted by the SEC staff’s Frequently Asked Question 7 on Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports (revised September 24, 2007), we will endeavor to disclose all material changes, if any, to our internal control over financial reporting made in respect of this acquisition in our annual report on Form 10-K to be filed by us for the year ending December 31, 2021, in which annual report our assessment that encompasses Simplura will also be included.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The attestation report of the registered public accounting firm on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is presented in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report and is hereby incorporated by reference.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
The principal executive and financial officers also conducted an evaluation of whether any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20172020 that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to materially affect such control. Such officers have concluded that no such

The Simplura acquisition, which was completed on November 18, 2020, has had a material impact on the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the combined company from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2020. The acquisition also resulted in material changes have occurred.in the combined company's internal controls over financial reporting. The Company is in the process of designing and integrating policies, processes, operations, technology, and other components of internal controls over financial reporting of the consolidated company. Management will monitor the implementation of new controls and test the operating effectiveness when instances are available in future periods.
Item 9B.Other Information.
Item 9B.    Other Information.
 
Effective March 12, 2018, Matthew Umscheid, our current Senior Vice President, Strategic Services, is being transferred to employment in such role at our LogistiCare business, pursuant to an offer letter dated March 6, 2018. In connection with this transfer, Mr. Umscheid is resigning as an officer of the Company. Under the terms of his offer letter with LogistiCare, Mr. Umscheid’s annual base salary will remain at $350,000, his target annual bonus for 2018 will remain at 75% of his base salary, and there is no term of employment. In his new role, Mr. Umscheid will also be eligible to participate in other compensation and benefit programs made available to LogistiCare’s senior executives, including a long-term incentive plan.None.




114


PART III
 
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 10.     Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting2021 Annual Meeting of stockholders;Stockholders (the "2021 Proxy Statement") under the captions "Election of Directors," "Corporate Governance" and "Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports"; provided that if such proxy statementour 2021 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,2021, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
 
Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our senior management, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, as well as our directors, officers and employees. This code of ethics is part of our broader Compliance and Ethics Plan and Code of Conduct, which is available free of charge in the Investor Relations“Investors” section of our website at www.prscholdings.com.www.modivcare.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer on our website. The information contained on our website is not part of, and is not incorporated in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.
  
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
Item 11.    Executive Compensation.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with2021 Proxy Statement under the SECcaptions "Executive Compensation" and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;"Corporate Governance"; provided that if such proxy statementour 2021 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,2021, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
  
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
This Item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders; provided that if such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
 
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2020, regarding our 2006 Plan.

Plan categoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders390,606$64.321,250,381
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total390,606 $64.32 1,250,381 


(1) The number of shares shown in this column represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to stock options and other stock-based awards that were previously granted and were outstanding as of December 31, 2020 under the 2006 Plan.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with2021 Proxy Statement under the SECsub‑captions "Certain Relationships and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meetingRelated Party Transactions" and "Independence of stockholders;the Board" under the caption "Corporate Governance"; provided that if such proxy statementour 2021 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,2021, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
  
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with2021 Proxy Statement under the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;caption
115


"Independent Registered Public Accountants"; provided that if such proxy statementour 2021 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,2021, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
 




116


PART IV
 
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
 
(a)(1) Financial Statements
 
The following consolidated financial statements including footnotes are included in Item 8.
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172020 and 2016; 2019; 
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015;2018;
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015;2018;
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015;2018; and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
 
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
  Additions    
Balance at
beginning of
period
Charged to
costs and
expenses
Charged to
other
accounts
DeductionsBalance at
end of
period
Year Ended December 31, 2020:       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$5,933 642 $$4,172 (1)$2,403 
Year Ended December 31, 2019:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts$1,854 $3,220 $1,090 $231 (1)$5,933 
Year Ended December 31, 2018:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts$5,262 $338 $(523)$3,223 (1)$1,854 
  
Additions    

Balance at
beginning of
period

Charged to
costs and
expenses

Charged to
other
accounts

Deductions
Balance at
end of
period
Year Ended December 31, 2017: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$5,901

$815

$(466)(1)$488
(2)$5,762















Year Ended December 31, 2016: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$4,380

$3,298

$1,058
(1)$2,835
(2)$5,901















Year Ended December 31, 2015: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$3,198

$1,928

$1,152
(1)$1,898
(2)$4,380

Notes:
 
Schedule above has been recast from prior year to exclude activity related to discontinued operations.(1)Write-offs, net of recoveries.
(1)Amounts primarily include the allowance for contractual adjustments related to our non-emergency transportation services operating segment that are recorded as adjustments to non-emergency transportation services revenue. Amount additionally includes impact from change in foreign currency rates.
(2)Write-offs, net of recoveries.


All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in our financial statements or the related notes thereto.


 
 

117



 (3) Exhibits

Exhibit NumberDescription
2.1
Exhibit
Number
2.2
Description
2.1


2.22.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.1*

3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1*
4.1
10.1
10.1
10.2
10.3


10.4
10.5
118


10.6

10.7
10.8
10.9
10.8+
10.10
10.9+
10.11
10.10+
10.12+


10.13+
10.11+
10.14+
10.12+10.15+


10.13+
10.14+


10.16+
10.15+

10.16+

10.17+
10.18+
10.17+
10.19+


10.20+
10.21+
10.22+
10.23+
10.24+

10.2510.18+
119


10.19+
10.20
10.26*10.21
10.27+
10.22
10.23+


10.28+*10.24+
10.29+*
10.25*+
12.1*
10.26*+
21.1*
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
23.3*
31.1*
31.1*
31.2*
32.1*
32.2*
99.1*
101. INS*Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*Inline XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL*Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
104Cover page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
+
+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Filed herewith.



120


Item 16.        Form 10-K Summary.


None.

121



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
THE PROVIDENCE SERVICE CORPORATION
By:/s/ R. Carter PateDaniel E. Greenleaf
R. Carter Pate
Interim Daniel E. Greenleaf
Chief Executive Officer
 
Dated: March 9, 2018February 26, 2021
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
SignatureTitleDate
/S/ R. CARTER PATEDANIEL E. GREENLEAF
Interim Chief Executive Officer
and Director
March 9, 2018February 26, 2021
R. Carter PateDaniel E. Greenleaf(Principal Executive Officer)
/S/ DAVID C. SHACKELTONKEVIN DOTTSChief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
David C. ShackeltonKevin Dotts(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/ WILLIAM SEVERANCEJOHN MCMAHONChief Accounting OfficerMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
William SeveranceJohn McMahon(Principal Accounting Officer)
/S/ CHRISTOPHER S. SHACKELTONChairman of the BoardMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
Christopher S. Shackelton
/S/ TODD J. CARTERDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
Todd J. Carter
/S/ DAVID A. COULTERDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
David A. Coulter
/S/ RICHARD A. KERLEYDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
Richard A. Kerley
/S/ KRISTI L. MEINTSDirectorMarch 9, 2018
Kristi L. Meints
/S/ LESLIE V. NORWALKDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
Leslie V. Norwalk
/S/ FRANK J. WRIGHTDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 26, 2021
Frank J. Wright



129
122