UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20162019
Commission File No. 001-31720
PIPER JAFFRAYSANDLER COMPANIES
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWAREDelaware 30-0168701
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 1000
900
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
��(612)(612) 303-6000 
(Registrant’sRegistrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange On Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per sharePIPRThe New York Stock Exchange
   
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.        Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes  ¨    No  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  þ No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"filer," "smaller reporting company, " and "smaller reporting"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ    Accelerated filer ¨    Non-accelerated filer ¨
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, ¨indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨ No  þ
The aggregate market value of the 14,421,77813,852,980 shares of the Registrant’sRegistrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates based upon the last sale price, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, of the Common Stock on June 30, 201628, 2019 was approximately $544 million.$1.0 billion.
As of February 21, 2017,2020, the registrant had 15,164,92917,318,184 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference information (to the extent specific sections are referred to herein) from the Registrant’sRegistrant's Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017.15, 2020.
 




TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I
ITEM 1. 
ITEM 1A. 
ITEM 1B. 
ITEM 2. 
ITEM 3. 
ITEM 4. 
    
PART II
ITEM 5. 
ITEM 6. 
ITEM 7. 
ITEM 7A. 
ITEM 8. 
ITEM 9. 
ITEM 9A. 
ITEM 9B. 
    
PART III
ITEM 10. 
ITEM 11. 
ITEM 12. 
ITEM 13. 
ITEM 14. 
    
PART IV
ITEM 15. 
ITEM 16. 
  





PART I


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162019 (this "Form 10-K") contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements other than historical information or statements of current conditions and may relate to our future plans and objectives and results, and also may include our belief regarding the effect of various legal proceedings, as set forth under "Legal Proceedings" in Part I, Item 3 of this Form 10-K and in our subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including those factors discussed below under "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, as well as those factors discussed under "External Factors Impacting Our Business" included in "Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K and in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Our SEC reports are available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.comwww.pipersandler.com and at the SEC’sSEC's Web site at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.


As described in Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K and as previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2020, Piper Jaffray Companies completed the acquisition of SOP Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries, including Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. (collectively, "Sandler O'Neill") on January 3, 2020. Upon completion of the acquisition, Piper Jaffray Companies was renamed Piper Sandler Companies. The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" presented in this Form 10-K cover periods that ended prior to the completion of our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, and therefore only include the results of Piper Jaffray Companies. Sandler O'Neill's results of operations will be included in our consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition.

ITEM 1.     BUSINESS.


Overview


Piper JaffraySandler Companies ("Piper Jaffray"Sandler") is an investment bank and asset managementinstitutional securities firm, serving the needs of corporations, private equity groups, public entities, non-profit entities and institutional investors in the U.S. and internationally. Founded in 1895, Piper JaffraySandler provides a broad set of products and services, including financial advisory services; equity and debt capital markets products; public finance services; financial advisory services; equity research and institutional brokerage; fixed income institutional brokerage; and private equity and fixed income research; and asset management services.strategies. Our headquarters are located in Minneapolis, Minnesota and we have offices across the United States and international locations in London, Aberdeen and Hong Kong and Zurich.Kong. We market our investment banking and institutional securities business under Piper JaffraySandler and Simmons & Company International – Energy Specialists| A Division of Piper Jaffray. Our traditional asset management business is marketed under Advisory Research, Inc.Sandler.

Prior to 1998, Piper Jaffray was an independent public company. U.S. Bancorp acquired the Piper Jaffray business in 1998 and operated it through various subsidiaries and divisions. At the end of 2003, U.S. Bancorp facilitated a tax-free distribution of our common stock to all U.S. Bancorp shareholders, causing Piper Jaffray to become an independent public company again.


Our BusinessesBusiness


We operate through twoin one reportable business segments, Capital Markets and Asset Management. We believe that the mix of activities across our business segments helps to provide diversification in our business model.

Capital Markets

The Capital Markets segment providesproviding investment banking and institutional sales, trading and research services for various equity and fixed income products. This segment also includes the results from our alternative asset management funds and our principal investments.

Investment Banking – For our corporate clients, we provide advisory services, primarily relating to mergers and acquisitions, equity private placements, and debt and restructuring advisory. We also help raise capital through equity and debt financings. We operate in the following focus sectors: healthcare; energy; consumer; diversified industrials and services; business services; technology; financial services; and agriculture, clean technologies and renewables, primarily focusing on middle-market clients. For our government and non-profit clients, we underwrite debt issuances, provide municipal financial advisory and loan placement services, and offer various over-the-counter derivative products. Our public finance investment banking capabilities focus on state and local governments, cultural and social service non-profit entities, and the education, healthcare, hospitality, senior living and transportation sectors.


Equity and Fixed Income Institutional Brokerage – We offer both equity and fixed income advisory and trade execution services for institutional investors and government and non-profit entities. Integral to our capital markets efforts, we have equity sales and trading relationships with institutional investors in North America and Europe that invest in our core sectors. Our research analysts provide investment ideas and support to our trading clients on approximately 875 companies, inclusive of Sandler O'Neill's research coverage. Our fixed income sales and trading professionals have expertise in municipal, corporate, mortgage, agency, treasury and structured product securities and cover a range of institutional investors. We principally engage in trading activities to facilitate customer needs. Our strategic trading activities (i.e., proprietary trading) are dedicated solely to investing firm capital, and focus principally on proprietary investments in municipal bonds.

Alternative Asset Management Funds We have created alternative asset management funds in merchant banking, energy and senior living in order to invest firm capital and to manage capital from outside investors.
Investment Banking – For our corporate clients,
Discontinued Operations

In the third quarter of 2019, we help raise capital through equity and debt financings. We also provide advisory services, primarily relating to mergers and acquisitions, equity private placements and debt advisory. We operate in the following focus sectors: healthcare; energy; consumer; diversified industrials and services; business services; technology; financial institutions; and agriculture, clean technologies and renewables, primarily focusing on middle-market clients. For our government and non-profit clients, we underwrite debt issuances, provide municipal financial advisory and loan placement services, and offer various over-the-counter derivative products. Our public finance investment banking capabilities focus on state and local governments, cultural and social service non-profit entities, and the education, healthcare, hospitality, senior living and transportation sectors.


Equity and Fixed Income Institutional Brokerage – We offer both equity and fixed income advisory and trade execution services for institutional investors and government and non-profit entities. Integral to our capital markets efforts, we have equity sales and trading relationships with institutional investors in North America and Europe that invest in our core sectors. Our research analysts provide investment ideas and support to our trading clients on approximately 700 companies. Our fixed income sales and trading professionals have expertise in municipal, corporate, mortgage, agency, treasury and structured product securities and cover a range of institutional investors. We engage in trading activities for both customer facilitation and strategic trading purposes. Our strategic trading activities (i.e. proprietary trading) are dedicated solely to investing firm capital, and focus principally on proprietary investments in municipal bonds and U.S. government agency securities.

Principal Investments – We engage in merchant banking activities, which involve equity or debt investments in late stage private companies. Additionally, we have investments in private equity funds and other firm investments.

Alternative Asset Management Funds We have created alternative asset management funds in merchant banking, energy, and senior living in order to invest firm capital as well as to manage capital from outside investors.

Asset Management

The Asset Management segment includessold our traditional asset management business andsubsidiary, Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"). ARI's results, previously reported in our investments in registered funds and private funds or partnerships that we manage. Our traditional asset management business offers specialized investment management solutionsAsset Management segment, have been presented herein as discontinued operations for institutions, private clients and investment advisors. We manage domestic and international equity strategies, as well as MLP and energy infrastructure strategies, through open-end and closed-end funds. We also provide customized solutionsall periods presented. For further information on our discontinued operations, see Note 4 to our clients. In many cases, we offer both diversified and more concentrated versionsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our products, generally through separately managed accounts.this Form 10-K.

Equity – For the majority of our equity product offerings, we take a value-driven approach to managing assets in the domestic and international equity markets. These investment strategies have an investment philosophy that centers on fundamental security selection across industries and regions with a focus on analyzing, among other things, a company's financial position, liquidity and profitability in light of its valuation. By focusing on securities with attractive net asset values, we seek to generate competitive long-term returns while minimizing investment risk. We added an aggressive growth equity product at the end of 2016. The investment philosophy for this equity product is centered around identifying and valuing U.S. growth franchises, recognizing investment themes, objective allocations to the investment themes, and a combination of fundamental and technical analysis.

Master Limited Partnerships ("MLPs") and Energy Infrastructure We also manage MLPs, energy infrastructure, and related operating entity assets focused on the energy sector. These strategies focus on growth, yet seek to limit exposure to riskier securities by placing greater importance on characteristics which support stable distributions and are representative of higher quality MLPs, including less volatile businesses, strategic assets, cleaner balance sheets and proven management teams. In addition to our MLP-focused funds, we manage other private funds focused on energy sector securities.

As of December 31, 2016, total assets under management ("AUM") were $8.7 billion, of which approximately 47 percent was invested in equities and 53 percent in MLPs and energy infrastructure securities. As of the same date, approximately 15 percent of our AUM was invested in international and global investment strategies and 85 percent was invested in domestic investment strategies. Approximately 78 percent of our AUM as of December 31, 2016 was managed on behalf of institutional clients, including foundations, endowments, pension funds and corporations, and through mutual fund sponsors and registered advisors. Approximately 13 percent of our AUM was managed on behalf of individual client relationships, which are principally high net worth individuals, and approximately 9 percent of our AUM was managed through sub-advisory relationships on closed-end funds.




Financial Information about Geographic Areas


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the substantial majority of our net revenues and long-lived assets were located in the U.S.


Competition


Our business is subject to intense competition driven by large Wall Street and international firms, operating independently or as part of a large commercial banking institution. We also compete with regional broker dealers, boutique and niche-specialty firms, asset management firms and alternative trading systems that effect securities transactions through various electronic venues. Competition is based on a variety of factors, including price, quality of advice and service, reputation, product selection, transaction execution, financial resources and investment performance. Many of our large competitors have greater financial resources than we have and may have more flexibility to offer a broader set of products and services than we can.


In addition, there is significant competition within the securities industry for obtaining and retaining the services of qualified employees. Our business is a human capital business and the performance of our business is dependent upon the skills, expertise and performance of our employees. Therefore, our ability to compete effectively is dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified individuals who are motivated to serve the best interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company. Attracting and retaining employees depends, among other things, on our company’scompany's culture, management, work environment, geographic locations and compensation.


Employees


As of February 21, 2017,2020, we had approximately 1,3151,565 employees, of whom approximately 7751,108 were registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA").


Regulation


As a participant in the financial services industry, our business is regulated by U.S. federal and state regulatory agencies, self-regulatory organizations ("SROs") and securities exchanges, and by foreign governmental agencies, financial regulatory bodies and securities exchanges. We are subject to complex and extensive regulation of most aspects of our business, including the manner in which securities transactions are effected, net capital requirements, recordkeeping and reporting procedures, relationships and conflicts with customers, the handling of cash and margin accounts, conduct, experience and training requirements for certain employees, and the manner in which we prevent and detect money-laundering and bribery activities. The regulatory framework of the financial services industry is designed primarily to safeguard the integrity of the capital markets and to protect customers, not creditors or shareholders.


The laws, rules and regulations comprising this regulatory framework can (and do) change frequently, as can the interpretation and enforcement of existing laws, rules and regulations. Conditions in the global financial markets and economy, including the 2008 financial crisis, caused legislators and regulators to increase the examination, enforcement and rule-making activity directed toward the financial services industry. The intensity of the regulatory environment may correlate with the level and nature of our legal proceedings for a given period, and increased intensity could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary (Piper JaffraySandler & Co.) is registered as a securities broker dealer with the SEC and is a member of various SROs and securities exchanges. In July of 2007, the National Association of Securities Dealers and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration functions of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") consolidated to form FINRA, which now serves as the primary SRO of Piper JaffraySandler & Co., although the NYSE continues to have oversight over NYSE-related market activities. FINRA regulates many aspects of our U.S. broker dealer business, including registration, education and conduct of our broker dealer employees, examinations, rulemaking, enforcement of these rules and the federal securities laws, trade reporting and the administration of dispute resolution between investors and registered firms. We have agreed to abide by the rules of FINRA (as well as those of the NYSE and other SROs), and FINRA has the power to expel, fine and otherwise discipline Piper JaffraySandler & Co. and its officers, directors and employees. Among the rules that apply to Piper JaffraySandler & Co. are the uniform net capital rule of the SEC (Rule 15c3-1) and the net capital rule of FINRA. Both rules set a minimum level of net capital a broker dealer must maintain and also require that a portion of the broker dealer's assets be relatively liquid. Under the applicable FINRA rule, FINRA may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying cash dividends if resulting net capital falls below FINRA requirements. In addition, Piper JaffraySandler & Co. is subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital. As a result

of these rules, our ability to make withdrawals of capital from Piper JaffraySandler & Co. may be limited. In addition, Piper JaffraySandler & Co. is licensed as a broker dealer in each of the 50 states, requiring us to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of each state. Any state may revoke a license to conduct a securities business and fine or otherwise discipline broker dealers and their officers, directors and employees.


We also operate two entitiesone entity that areis authorized, licensed and regulated by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and registered under the laws of England and Wales, as well as an entity that is authorized, licensed and regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission and registered under the laws of Hong Kong. The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission regulate these entities (in their respective jurisdictions) in areas of capital adequacy, customer protection and business conduct, among others. We also have a subsidiary organized in Guernsey and regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission.Commission ("GFSC").


Entities in the jurisdictions identified above are also subject to anti-money laundering regulations. Piper JaffraySandler & Co., our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary, is subject to the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which contains anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and mandates the implementation of various regulations requiring us to implement standards for verifying client identification at the time the client relationship is initiated, monitoring client transactions and reporting suspicious activity. Our entities in Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and Guernsey are subject to similar anti-money laundering laws and regulations. We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as other anti-bribery laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from engaging in bribery or making other improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining an unfair business advantage.


We maintain subsidiaries that are registered as investment advisors with the SEC and subject to regulation and oversight by the SEC. Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"), Piper Jaffray Investment Management LLC ("PJIM"), and PJCPSC Capital Partners LLC, and Piper Sandler Advisors LLC are asset management subsidiaries and registered investment advisors. As registered investment advisors, these entities are subject to requirements that relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties to clients, maintaining an effective compliance program, solicitation agreements, conflicts of interest, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between advisor and advisory clients, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. Piper JaffraySandler & Co. is also a registered investment advisor and subject to these requirements. Also, certain investment funds that we manage are registered investment companies under the Investment Company Act, as amended. Those funds and entities that serve as the funds' investment advisors are subject to the Investment Company Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC, which regulate the relationship between a registered investment company and its investment advisor and prohibit or severely restrict principal transactions or joint transactions, among other requirements. ARI is also authorized by the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority as an investment advisor in Ireland and cleared by the Luxembourg Commission de Surviellance du Secteur Financier as a manager to Luxembourg funds. ARI is the investment advisor for Advisory Research Global Funds PLC, an open-ended investment company with variable capital authorized and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland pursuant to the European Communities Regulations (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities or "UCITS"). ARI has established a Tokyo office which is a Representative Office of a Foreign Investment Advisor subject to Japanese laws and regulations. PJIM is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") and the National Futures Association ("NFA") as a commodities pool operator. The registrations with the CFTC and NFA allow PJIM to enter into derivative instruments (e.g., interest rate swaps and credit default swap index contracts)swaps) to hedge risks associated with certain security positions of funds managed by PJIM. Parallel General Partners Limited is the general partner of several private equity limited partnerships; it and the limited partnerships are registered and regulated by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission ("GFSC").GFSC.


Certain of our businesses also are subject to compliance with laws and regulations of U.S. federal and state governments, non-U.S. governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizationsSROs or exchanges governing the privacy of client information. Any failure with respect to our practices, procedures and controls in any of these areas could subject us to regulatory consequences, including fines, and potentially other significant liabilities.



Information About our Executive Officers


Information regarding our executive officers and their ages as of February 21, 2017,2020, are as follows:
Name Age Position(s)
Andrew S. Duff59Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Stuart C. Harvey, Jr.55President and Chief Operating Officer
Chad R. Abraham 4851 Chief Executive Officer
Debbra L. Schoneman51President
Timothy L. Carter52Chief Financial Officer
James P. Baker52Global Co-Head of Global Investment Banking and Capital Markets
Christopher D. CrawshawJonathan J. Doyle 5054 Vice Chairman and Head of Asset Management
Christine N. Esckilsen48Chief Human Capital Officer
Frank E. Fairman59Head of Public FinanceFinancial Services Group
John W. Geelan 4144 General Counsel and Secretary
Jeff P. Klinefelter49Global Head of Equities
R. Scott LaRue 5659 Global Co-Head of Global Investment Banking and Capital Markets
Debbra L. Schoneman48Chief Financial Officer
Thomas G. Smith60Chief Strategy Officer
M. Brad Winges48Head of Fixed Income Services and Piper Jaffray Firm Investments and Trading


Andrew S. DuffChad R. Abraham is our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Duff became chairman and chief executive officer of Piper Jaffray Companies following completion of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003. He also has served as chairman of our broker dealer subsidiary since 2003, as chief executive officer of our broker dealer subsidiary since 2000, and as president of our broker dealer subsidiary since 1996. He has been with Piper Jaffray since 1980. Prior to the spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, Mr. Duff also was a vice chairman of U.S. Bancorp from 1999 through 2003.

Stuart C. Harvey, Jr. is our president and chief operating officer, a position he has held since October 2016. Mr. Harvey rejoined Piper Jaffray in 2015 as a partner in our merchant banking group, havingJanuary 2018. He previously served as a managing director at Piper Jaffray in our investment banking group from 1993 to 2003.

Chad R. Abraham is ourglobal co-head of global investment banking and capital markets a position he has held sincefrom October 2010.2010 to December 2017. Prior to his current role,that, he served as head of equity capital markets since November 2005. Mr. Abraham joined Piper JaffraySandler in 1991.


Christopher D. CrawshawDebbra L. Schoneman is our head of asset management. He has served in this role since January 2014. Mr. Crawshaw joined Piper Jaffray from Advisory Research, Inc., a Chicago-based asset management firm that we acquired in 2010, where he had been a managing director since 2004, having joined the company in 2001. Mr. Crawshaw was named president, of Advisory Research in 2012.

Christine N. Esckilsen is our chief human capital officer, a position she has held since January 2016. Ms. Esckilsen has been our2018. She previously served as chief financial officer from May 2008 to December 2017, and global head of human capitalequities from June 2017 to December 2017. Prior to that, she served as treasurer from August 2006 until May 2008; and a managingas finance director since 2011. She joined Piper Jaffray inof our corporate and institutional services business from July 2002 as an assistant general counsel responsible for employment matters and litigation.

Frank E. Fairman is head ofuntil July 2004 when the role was expanded to include our public finance services business,division. Ms. Schoneman joined Piper Sandler in 1990.

Timothy L. Carter is our chief financial officer, a position he has held since July 2005.January 2018. He previously served as senior vice president of finance from May 2017 to December 2017. Prior to that, he served as treasurer from May 2008 to May 2017, chief accounting officer from 2006 to May 2008, and controller from 1999 to 2006. Mr. Carter joined Piper Sandler in 1995.

James P. Baker is our global co-head of investment banking and capital markets, a position he has held since January 2019. Prior to that, he served as our co-head of energy investment banking from February 2016 to December 2018. Mr. Baker joined Piper Sandler in February 2016 in connection with our acquisition of Simmons & Company International, where Mr. Baker was a managing director and leader of its midstream/downstream investment banking group.

Jonathan J. Doyle is our vice chairman, senior managing principal and head of the firm's public finance investment bankingfinancial services group, from 1991 to 2005,a position he has held since January 2020. Mr. Doyle joined Piper Sandler in connection with our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, where Mr. Doyle served as well as the head of the firm's municipal derivative business from 2002 to 2005. He has been with Piper Jaffray since 1983.a senior managing principal.


John W. Geelan is our general counsel and secretary. He served as assistant general counsel and assistant secretary from November 2007 until becoming general counsel in January 2013. Mr. Geelan joined Piper JaffraySandler in 2005.


Jeff P. Klinefelter is the global head of our equities business, a position he has held since July 2012. From May 2010 until July 2012, he served as head of equity research. Mr. Klinefelter joined Piper Jaffray in 1997 as a research analyst.

R. Scott LaRueis our global co-head of global investment banking and capital markets, a position he has held since October 2010. He had previouslyPrior to that, he served as global co-head of consumer investment banking sincefrom February 2010 after having served asto September 2010 and co-head of consumer investment banking sincefrom August 2004. He has been with Piper Jaffray since 2003.


Debbra L. Schoneman is our chief financial officer. Ms. Schoneman2004 to January 2010. Mr. LaRue joined Piper JaffraySandler in 1990 and has held her current position since May 2008. She previously served as treasurer from August 2006 until May 2008. Prior to that, she served as finance director of our corporate and institutional services business from July 2002 until July 2004 when the role was expanded to include our public finance services division.2003.

Thomas G. Smith is our chief strategy officer, a position he has held since January 2016 ,which encompasses his roles as our head of strategy, corporate development, and investor relations. He joined Piper Jaffray in 1998 as a managing director in our technology investment banking group. He became head of corporate development in 2006 and head of investor relations in 2012.

M. Brad Winges is head of fixed income services, a position he has held since January 2009, and head of Piper Jaffray firm investments and trading, a position he has held since February 2014. Mr. Winges joined Piper Jaffray in 1991 and served as head of public finance services sales and trading from June 2005 until obtaining his current position. Prior to that, he served as head of municipal sales and trading from June 2003 until June 2005.

Additional Information


Our principal executive offices are located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 1000,900, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, and our general telephone number is (612) 303-6000. We maintain an Internet Web site at http://www.piperjaffray.com.www.pipersandler.com. The information contained on and connected to our Web site is not incorporated into this report.Form 10-K. We make available free of charge on or through our Web site our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and all other reports we file with the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with, or furnish them to, the SEC. Such reports are also available on the SEC's Web site at http://www.sec.gov. "Piper Jaffray,Sandler," the "Company," "registrant," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Piper JaffraySandler Companies and our subsidiaries. The Piper JaffraySandler logo and the other trademarks, tradenames and service marks of Piper JaffraySandler mentioned in this report or elsewhere, including, but not limited to, PIPER SANDLERSM, PIPER JAFFRAY®, REALIZE THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP®, ADVISORY RESEARCHSANDLER O'NEILL®, SANDLER O'NEILL & PARTNERS®, SANDLER O'NEILL MORTGAGE FINANCE®, SIMMONS ENERGY | A DIVISON OF PIPER SANDLERSM, SIMMONS ENERGY | A DIVISON OF PIPER JAFFRAYSM, SIMMONS ENERGYSM, SIMMONS & COMPANY INTERNATIONAL® ENERGY SPECIALISTS OF, PIPER JAFFRAY FINANCESM, PJIM®, PIPER JAFFRAY BIOINSIGHTSSM, BIOINSIGHTSSM, TAKING STOCK WITH TEENS®, HEALTHY ACTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE LIVING®, and GUIDES FOR THE JOURNEY® are the property of Piper Jaffray.Sandler.


ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS.


In the normal course of our business activities, we are exposed to a variety of risks. The principal risks we face in operating our business include: strategic risks, market risks, human capital risks, liquidity risks, credit risks, human capital risks, operational risks, and legal and regulatory risks. A full description of each of these principal areas of risk, as well as the primary risk management processes that we use to mitigate our risk exposure in each, is discussed below under the caption "Risk Management" included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.


The following discussion sets forth the risk factors that we have identified in each area of principal risk as being the most significantmaterial to our business, future financial condition, and results of operations. Although we discuss these risk factors primarily in the context of their potential effects on our business, financial condition or results of operations, you should understand that these effects can have further negative implications such as: reducing the price of our common stock; reducing our capital, which can have regulatory and other consequences; affecting the confidence that our clients and other counterparties have in us, with a resulting negative effect on our ability to conduct and grow our business; and reducing the attractiveness of our securities to potential purchasers, which may adversely affect our ability to raise capital and secure other funding or the prices at which we are able to do so. Further, additional risks beyond those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K or in other of our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC could adversely affect us. We cannot assure you that the risk factors herein or elsewhere in our other reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC address all potential risks that we may face.


These risk factors also serve to describe factors which may cause our results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K or in other documents or statements that make reference to this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements, as further described in this Form 10-K under the heading "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements," and other factors that may affect future results are discussed below under "Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.



Strategic Risksand Market Risk


Our business success depends in large part upon the strategic decisions made by our executive management, the alignment of business plans developed to act upon those decisions, and the quality of implementation of these business plans. Strategic risk represents the risk associated with our executive management failing to develop and execute on the appropriate strategic vision which demonstrates a commitment to our culture, leverages our core competencies, appropriately responds to external factors in the marketplace, and is in the best interests of our company. In setting out and executing upon a strategic vision for our business, we are faced with a number of inherent risks, including risks relating to external events and market and economic conditions, competition, and business performance that could all negatively affect our ability to execute on our strategic decisions and, therefore, our future financial condition or results of operations. The risks related to external events and overall market and/or economic conditions are referred to as market, or systemic, risk. The following are those risk factors that we have identified as being most significant to our ability to developstrategic vision, and execute upon a strategic vision.the market risks that may impact execution of our strategy.


Developments in market and economic conditions have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business and profitability and cause volatility in our results of operations.


Economic and market conditions have had, and will continue to have, a direct and material impact on our results of operations and financial condition because performance in the financial services industry is heavily influenced by the overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. For example:


Our equities investment banking revenue, in the form of underwriting, placementadvisory (i.e., mergers and financial advisory fees,acquisitions) and underwriting, is directly related to macroeconomic conditions and corresponding financial market activity. When the outlook for macroeconomic conditions is uncertain or negative, financial market activity generally tends to decrease, which can reduce our equities investment banking revenues. As an example, a significant portion of our equities investment banking revenues arein recent years have been derived from initial public offerings of middle-market companiesadvisory engagements in growthour focus sectors, and activity in this area is highly correlated to the macroeconomic environment and market conditions. Equity markets experienced significant declines in the beginning of 2016 amid signs of a slowdown in global economic growth, including in China and other developing markets. As a result, the number of initial public offerings declined significantly in the first half of 2016, and while there was some recovery in the second half as the macroeconomic outlook stabilized, 2016 saw the fewest initial public offerings since 2009, which negatively impacted our financial results during the year. A new decline in equity market valuations, whether due to reducedReduced expectations of U.S. economic growth or a worsening or unstabledecline in the global macroeconomic outlook could cause financial market activity to decrease and negatively affect our equities investment bankingadvisory revenues. In addition, global macroeconomic conditions and U.S. financial markets remain vulnerable to the potential risks posed by exogenous shocks, which could include, among other things, political and financial uncertainty in the United States and European Union, including further challenges to membership in the European Union, and further sovereign debt crises, renewed concern about China's economy, complications involving global trade, and terrorism and armed conflicts around the world, includingor other challenges to global trade or travel, such as might occur in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. These factors would affect not only our capital raising activities, but also our advisory fees from merger and acquisition engagements. Our advisory businessevent of a wider pandemic involving COVID-19, the illness caused by the novel coronavirus which was a significant contributor to our business performance in 2016, and a slowdown in this business for any reason, including an exogenous shock, would have a significant negative impact on our resultsidentified at the end of operations.2019. More generally, because our business is closely correlated to the macroeconomic outlook, worsening conditionsa significant deterioration in that outlook or an exogenous shock would

likely have an immediate and significant negative impact on our equities investment banking business and our overall company results of operations.


Interest ratesU.S. equity markets were generally strong in 2019 largely due to continuing strength in U.S. economic conditions and accommodative interest rate policy from the U.S. Federal Reserve. Although volatility was pronounced at times during the year due to concerns about trade disputes and the possibility of slowing GDP growth or recession, companies were generally able to continue to access U.S. equity markets in initial public offerings and other listings during most of 2019, which contributed positively to our operating results for the year. However, if volatility in the U.S. equity markets were to return or increase in 2020, whether due to the aforementioned factors or other concerns about U.S. or global economic conditions or political and financial uncertainty in the U.S., Europe, or other major global economies, or due to some other exogenous shock, companies may find it more difficult to conduct initial public offerings or raise additional capital from public equity markets, which could have a significantnegative impact on our equity capital markets business particularly our fixed income institutional business. This includes periods of volatility that manifest itself in changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, changes in the slope of the yield curve and credit spreads, and the rate of prepayments on our interest-earning assets (e.g., inventory) and our funding sources (e.g., short-term financing) which finance these assets. There were marked periodsoverall results of volatility in U.S. Treasury yields during 2016 attributed to the vote in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union and following the U.S. presidential election. The rise in interests rates following the U.S. presidential election appear to reflect the market’s expectation of higher growth and inflation. Yields will be impacted in 2017 as more information becomes available concerning the new U.S. presidential administration’s infrastructure spending, trade, and regulatory and tax reform priorities and the U.S. Congress’s support of those priorities. Yields will also be impacted by the Federal Reserve’s intent to increase the federal funds rate further during the year based on economic and labor market conditions. As to the impact to our business, a large percentage of our securities inventory - both that are held for facilitating client activity as well as our own proprietary trading - consist of fixed income securities, and rapid increases in interest rates decrease the value of these inventories, sometimes significantly. Further, our interest rate hedging strategies may not mitigate this volatility as we generally do not hedge all of our interest rate risk and volatility may reduce the correlation (i.e., effectiveness) between certain hedging vehicles and the securities inventory we are attempting to hedge. In addition, interest rate increases in 2017, both gradual and more severe, may negatively impact the volume of debt refinancing issuances underwritten by our public finance investment banking business, as well as our assetsoperations.

under management focused on master limited partnerships ("MLPs"), which may underperform compared to other asset classes in a rising interest rate environment.

Although many U.S. equity market indices reached record levels in 2016, a U.S. economic recession, a reduction in expectations for economic growth, declining prospects for future corporate earnings, or a significant worsening of global economic conditions would likely result in a decline in the financial markets, reducing asset valuations and adversely impacting our asset management business. A reduction in asset values would negatively impact this business by reducing the value of assets under management, and as a result, the revenues generated from this business.


It is difficult to predict the economic and market conditions for 2017,2020, which are dependent in large part upon the pace of global and U.S. economic growth and geopolitical events globally. Our smaller scale compared to many of our competitors and the cyclical nature of the economy and thisthe financial services industry leads to volatility in our financial results, including our operating margins, compensation ratios, business mix, and revenue and expense levels. Our financial performance may be limited by the fixed nature of certain expenses, the impact from unanticipated losses or expenses during the year, our business mix, and the inability to scale back costs in a timeframe to match decreases in revenue-related changes in market and economic conditions. As a result, our financial results may vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year.


Developments in specific business sectors and markets in which we conduct our business, have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business and profitability.


Our results for a particular period may be disproportionately impacted by declines in specific sectors of the U.S. or global economy, or for certain products within the financial services industry, due to our business mix and focus areas. For example:


Our equities investment banking business focuses on specific sectors, specificallyincluding healthcare, financial services, energy, consumer, diversified industrials and services, business services, technology, financial institutions, and agriculture, clean technologies and renewables. Volatility, uncertainty, or slowdowns in any of these sectors may adversely affect our business, sometimes disproportionately, and may cause volatility in the net revenues we receive from our corporate advisory and capital markets and corporate advisory activities. In recent years, the healthcare sector has been a significant contributor to our overall results, and going forward, the financial services sector will be a significant contributor following our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, and negative developments in this sectoreither of these sectors would materially and disproportionately impact us, even if general economic conditions were strong. Further, the energy sector has become one of our more significant sectors of coverage for our equity investment banking business since our acquisition of Simmons & Company International in February 2016. Energy markets suffered through much of 2015 and 2016 from a prolonged depression in oil and natural gas prices, which have only recently begun to recover. Disproportionately negative market conditions in the energy sector will slow and hinder our ability to realize the benefits from the acquisition. Lastly,In addition, we may not participate, or may participate to a lesser degree than other firms, in sectors that experience significant activity, such as real estate, and our operating results may not correlate with the results of other firms whichthat participate in these sectors.


Our public finance investment banking business depends heavily upon conditions in the municipal market. It focuses on investment banking activity in sectors that include state and local government, education, senior living, healthcare, transportation, and hospitality sectors, with an emphasis on transactions with a par value of $500 million or less. Challenging market conditions for theseConcerns about a slowdown in U.S. economic growth could have a disproportionate impact on high-yield sectors, that are disproportionately worse than those impacting the broader economy or municipal markets generally may adverselywhich could have a negative impact our business. Further, our fixed income institutional business andon our public finance business are tied to the municipal market andbusiness. Further, the enactment, or the threat of enactment, of any legislation that would alteralters the financing alternatives available to municipalitieslocal or state governments or tax-exempt organizations through the elimination or reduction of tax-exempt bonds wouldcould have a negative impact these businesses. Any reduction or elimination of tax-exempt bond interest, or a reduction in individual income tax rates, could negatively impact the value of the municipal securities we hold in our inventory as well as our public finance investment banking business more generally, which would negatively impact the results of operations for these businesses.

In recent years, there has been a shift in investor preference from actively managed investment strategies to passively managed investment strategies. This shift, if it is sustained, could further negatively impact our business and results of operations. For example, our asset management revenues are derived from actively managed equity strategies, and this type of investment product has experienced asset outflows in recent years, including in 2016, as the shift to passively managed strategies gained momentum and our performance lagged. Asset outflows negatively affect results of operations for this business, as revenues are largely made up of management fees which are based on a percentage of assets under management. In 2016, as a result of a decline in market valuations in certain sectors and net outflows of assets under management, we recorded an $82.9 million non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill associated with our Asset Management segment. Further outflows of assets under management caused by investor preference for passively managed equity strategies, especially if coupled with investment performance below comparable benchmarks or any outflows from equity strategies generally or

decline in equity valuations, would negatively impact our results of operations for this business,in these businesses. For example, the Tax Cuts and could leadJobs Act of 2017 ("Tax Cuts and Jobs Act") eliminated tax-exempt advance refunding bonds, which are bonds issued by a local or state government to future non-cash impairment charges onrefinance outstanding bonds before the remaining goodwill associated with our Asset Management segment.

Management and performance fees we earn on assets invested by institutions and individuals focused on MLPs and other investments relatedoriginal bonds mature or are callable in order to the energy infrastructure sector are a meaningful contributortake advantage of lower borrowing costs. The elimination of tax-exempt advance refunding bonds has led to our asset management revenues. Return on investment in the energy infrastructure sector is dependent to a meaningful degree on the prices of energy commodities such as natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil, refined petroleum products or coal. Persistently depressed prices for any of these products, such as those experienced in 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, will likely lead to a further deterioration of market conditions for companies in the energy infrastructure sector and poorer returns in this sector, and, consequently, a reduction in the management and performance fees we receive.total amount of refunding issuances made by issuers, which has impacted our public finance business.


Our fixed income institutional business derives its revenue from sales and trading activity in the municipal market and from products within the taxable market, hybrid preferreds, and government agency products. Our operating results for our fixed income institutional business may not correlate with the results of other firms or the fixed income market generally because a significant portion of our business focuses on the municipal market and we do not participate in significant segments of the fixed income markets such as credit default swaps, corporate high-yield bonds, currencies andor commodities.


Financing and advisory services engagements are transactional in nature and do not generally provide for subsequent engagements.


Even though we work to represent our clients at every stage of their lifecycle, we are typically retained on a short-term, engagement-by-engagement basis in connection with specific advisory or capital markets or mergers and acquisitions transactions. As a consequence, the timing of when fees are earned varies, and, therefore, our financial results from advisory and capital markets and corporate advisory activities may experience volatility quarter to quarter based on equity market conditions as well as the macroeconomic business cycle more broadly. In particular, our revenues related to acquisition and dispositionadvisory transactions tend to be more unpredictable or lumpy, from quarter to quarter due to the one-time nature of the transaction and the size of the fee. As a result, high levels of revenue in one quarter will not necessarily be predictive of continued high levels of revenue in any subsequent period. If we are unable to generate a substantial number of new engagements and generate fees from the successful completion of those transactions, our business and results of operations will likelycould be adversely affected.


The volumenumber of anticipated investment banking transactions may differ from actual results.


The completion of anticipated investment banking transactions in our pipeline is uncertain and partially beyond our control, and our investment banking revenue is typically earned only upon the successful completion of a transaction. In most cases, we receive little or no payment for investment banking engagements that do not result in the successful completion of a transaction. For example, a client's acquisition transaction may be delayed or terminated because of a failure to agree upon final terms with the counterparty, failure to obtain necessary regulatory consents or boarddirector or stockholder approvals, failure to secure necessary financing, adverse market conditions or unexpected financial or other problemsissues in the client's or counterparty's business. More importantly, anticipated advisory or capital markets transactions may be delayed or terminated as a result of a decline in or uncertainty surrounding market or economic conditions. If parties fail to complete a transaction on which we are advising or an offering in which we are participating, we earn little or no revenue from the transaction and may have incurred significant expenses (for example,(e.g., travel and legal expenses) associated with the transaction. Accordingly, our business is highly dependent on market and economic conditions as well as the decisions and actions of our clients and interested third parties, and the number of engagements we have at any given time (and any characterization or description of our deal pipelines) is subject to change and may not necessarily result in future revenues.

Asset management revenue may vary based on investment performance and market and economic factors.

The success of our asset management business is largely dependent on the level of assets under management, as revenues are primarily derived from management fees paid on the assets under management. Our ability to maintain or increase assets under management is subject to a number of factors, including investors' perception of our past performance, market or economic conditions, competition from other fund managers and our ability to negotiate terms with major investors.

Investment performance is one of the most important factors in retaining existing clients and competing for new asset management business. Even when market conditions are generally favorable, our investment performance may be adversely affected by our investment style and the particular investments that we make. For example, certain of our investment strategies have had investment performance beneath comparable benchmarks for an extended period of time, which we believe contributed to net asset outflows in 2016. To the extent our investment performance is perceived to be poor in either relative or absolute terms, our asset management revenues will likely be reduced, existing clients may withdraw funds business in favor of better performing products or a different investment style or focus, our ability to attract new funds will likely be impaired, and our key employees in the business may

depart, whether to join a competitor or otherwise. In addition, poor investment performance may negatively affect the value of our capital investments in our investment funds or the seed capital we have committed to certain investment strategies.

In addition, a significant portion of our asset management revenues are derived from actively managed equity strategies, and this type of investment product has experienced asset outflows in recent years in favor of passively managed equity strategies, which offer lower management fees than actively managed strategies. To the extent that this trend continues and passively managed strategies continue to gain market share at the expense of actively managed strategies, it is possible that we may continue to experience asset outflows, find it increasingly difficult to attract new assets under management, and be unable to maintain our current fee structures given price competition, which would negatively impact our results of operations. The decline in our asset management revenues in 2016 led us to a record an $82.9 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge relating to our Asset Management segment. Future declines could lead to additional non-cash impairment charges on the remaining goodwill associated with our Asset Management segment.


We may make strategic acquisitions, and minority investments,enter into new business opportunities, or engage in joint ventures, or divest or exit existing businesses, which could cause us to incur unforeseen expenses and have disruptive effects on our business and may not yield the benefits we expect.


We may grow in part through corporate development or similar activities that maycould include acquisitions, joint ventures and minority investment stakes. Most recently, we expanded our equities investment banking businessstakes, and entering into the energy and financial institutions sectors through our completed acquisitionsnew lines of Simmons & Company International and River Branch Holdings LLC, respectively. We also added scale to our fixed income institutional sales and trading business through our acquisition of BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc. Of these three, the most significant was Simmons & Company International, making the energy sector one of our more significant sectors of coverage for our equity investment banking business. There are a number of risks associated with corporate developmentthese activities. Costs or difficulties relating to a transaction, including integration of products, employees, technology systems, accounting systems and management controls, or entry into a new business line, may be difficult to predict accurately and be greater than expected causing our estimates to differ from actual results. Importantly, we may be unable to retain key personnel after thea transaction, including personnel who are critical to the success of the ongoing business. We may incur unforeseen liabilities of an acquired company or from entry into a new business line, that could impose significant and unanticipated legal costs on us. Also,In 2019, we announced our share price could decline afteracquisitions of Sandler O'Neill and Weeden & Co. L.P. ("Weeden & Co."). These transactions represented a significant investment in our equities investment banking and institutional brokerage businesses, and we announce or complete a transaction if investors viewbelieve will present us with the transaction as too costly or unlikelychallenges and risks discussed above, especially those relating to improve our competitive position.integration, execution, and retention of key personnel. We will need to successfully manage these risks in order to fully realize the anticipated benefits of these transactions.


Longer-term, theseour corporate development activities may require increased costs in the form of management personnel, financial and management systems and controls and facilities, which, in the absence of continued revenue growth, wouldcould cause our operating margins to decline. In addition, when we acquire a business, a substantial portion of the purchase price is often allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. Our goodwill and intangible assets are tested at least annually for impairment. If, in connection with that test, we determine that a reporting unit’s impliedunit's fair value is less than its carrying value, we maywould be required to recognize an impairment to the goodwill associated with that reporting unit. For example, we recorded a $82.9 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"), a Chicago-based asset management firm that we acquired in 2010. The charge in our Asset Management segment negatively impacted our net income and results of operations and resulted in a net loss in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for our full-year results in 2016. More generally, any difficulties that we experience could disrupt our ongoing business, increase our expenses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We also may be unable to achieve anticipated benefits and synergies from thea transaction as fully as expected or within the expected time frame. Divestitures or elimination of existing businesses or products could have similar effects. For example, we shut down our Hong Kong capital markets business in 2012, and realized a pre-tax loss on the investment in our Hong Kong subsidiaries.


We may not be able to compete successfully with other companies in the financial services industry who often have significantly greater resources than we do.


The financial services industry remains extremelyhighly competitive, and our revenues and profitability will suffer if we are unable to compete effectively. We generally compete generally on the basis of such factors as quality of advice and service, reputation, price, product selection, transaction execution and financial resources. Pricing and other competitive pressures in investment banking, including trends towardthe use of multiple book runners, co-managers, and multiple financial advisors handling transactions, have continuedaffected and could continue to adversely affect our revenues. The trend toward multiple book runners has also been accompanied by an increasing disparity in the relative economics between or among book runners, with the senior book runner(s) receiving a large percentage of the economics.


We remain at a competitive disadvantage given our relatively small size compared to some of our competitors. Large financial services firms generally have a larger capital base, greater access to capital, and greater technology resources, than we have, affording them greater capacity for risk and potential for innovation, an extended geographic reach and flexibility to offer a broader set of products. For

example, some of these firms have usedare able to use their resources and larger capital base to take advantage of growth in international markets andoffer additional products or services to support their investment banking business by offering credit products to corporate clients, which iscan be a significant competitive advantage. With respect to our fixed income institutional brokerage and public finance investment banking businesses, it is more difficult for us to diversify and differentiate our product set, and our fixed income business mix currently is concentrated in the municipal market and to a lesser extent corporate credits, potentially with less opportunity for growth than other firms which have grown their fixed income businesses by investing in, developing and offering non-traditional products (e.g., credit default swaps, interest rate products and currencies and commodities).


Our inability to identify and address actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest may negatively impact our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business.


We regularly address actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest in our business, including situations where our services to a particular client or our own investments or other interests conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another client. Appropriately identifying and dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and we face the risk that our current policies, controls and procedures do not timely identify or appropriately manage such conflicts of interest. It is possible that actual, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to client dissatisfaction, litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with potential or actual conflicts of interest. Client dissatisfaction, litigation, or regulatory enforcement actions arising from a failure to adequately deal with conflicts of interest, and the reputational harm suffered as a consequence, could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Damage to our reputation could damageharm our business.


Maintaining our reputation is critical to attracting and maintaining clients, customers, investors, and employees. If we fail to deal with, or appear to fail to deal with, issues that may give rise to reputational risk, such failure or appearance of failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price. These issues include, but are not limited to, appropriately dealing with potential conflicts of interest, legal and regulatory requirements, ethical issues, money laundering, cybersecurity, and the proper identification of the strategic, market, credit, liquidity, human capital, liquidity, credit, operational, legal and operationalregulatory risks inherent in our business and products.


The financial services industry and the markets in which we operate are subject to systemic risk that could adversely affect ourHuman Capital Risk

Our business is a human capital business, and, results.

Participants in the financial services industry and markets increasingly are closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing, technology and other relationships between them. A significant adverse development with one participant (such as a bankruptcy or default) may spread to others and lead to significant concentrated or market-wide problems (such as defaults, liquidity problems or losses) for other participants, including us. This systemic risk was evident during 2008 following the demise of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, and the resulting events (sometimes described as "contagion") had a negative impact on the remaining industry participants, including us. Further, the control and risk management infrastructure of the markets in which we operate often is outpaced by financial innovation and growth in new types of securities, transactions and markets. Systemic risk is inherently difficult to assess and quantify, and its form and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time.

Risk management processes may not fully mitigate exposure to the various risks that we face.

We refine our risk management techniques, strategies and assessment methods on an ongoing basis. However, risk management techniques and strategies, both ours and those available to the market generally, may not be fully effective in identifying and mitigating our risk exposure in all economic market environments or against all types of risk. For example, we may fail to identify or anticipate particular risks that our systems are capable of identifying, or the systems that we use, and that are used within the industry generally, may not be capable of identifying certain risk, or every economic and financial outcome, or the specifics and timing of such outcomes. In addition, our risk management techniques and strategies seek to balance our ability to profit from our market-making and investing positions with our exposure to potential losses. Some of our strategies for managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior. We apply statistical and other tools to these observations to quantify our risk exposure. Any failures in our risk management techniques and strategies to accurately quantify our risk exposure could limit our ability to manage risks. In addition, any risk management failures could cause our losses to be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. Further, our quantified modeling does not take all risks into account. Our more qualitative approach to managing those risks could prove insufficient, exposing us to material unanticipated losses.


Market Risks

Market risk represents the risk of losses, or financial volatility, that may result from the change in value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Our exposure to market risk is inherent in our business activities and is directly related to our role as a financial intermediary for our clients, our market-making activities, and our strategic trading activities. Market risks are inherent both to cash and derivative financial instruments. Our inability to identify and completely mitigate every market risk that we encounter could negatively impacttherefore, our future financial condition orand results of operations.operations are significantly dependent upon our employees and their actions. Our success depends on the skills, expertise, and performance of our employees. Human capital risks represent the risks posed if we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals who are motivated to serve the best interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company, as well as the risks posed if our culture fails to encourage such behavior. Human capital risk is also present where we fail to detect and prevent employees from acting contrary to our policies and procedures, for example, if an employee were to inadequately safeguard or misuse our clients' confidential information. Any failure by us in creating and maintaining a culture that emphasizes serving our clients' best interests or detecting or preventing employees from engaging in behaviors that run counter to that culture might lead to reputational damage for our firm. The following are those markethuman capital risk factors that we have identified as posing the most significant risks to us.


Our underwriting, proprietary trading,ability to attract, develop and principal investments expose us to riskretain highly skilled and productive employees, develop the next generation of loss.

We engage inour business leadership, and instill and maintain a varietyculture of activities in which we commit or invest our own capital, including underwriting, lending, proprietary trading, and principal investing. In our role as underwriter for equity and fixed income securities, we commit to purchase securities from the issuer or one or more holders of the issuer's securities, and then sell those securities to other investors or into the public markets, as applicable. Our underwriting activities, including our equity block trading activities, expose usethics is critical to the risksuccess of loss ifour business.

Historically, the pricemarket for qualified employees within the financial services industry has been marked by intense competition, and the performance of our business may suffer to the security falls below the price we purchased the security at before we are able to sell all of the securities that we purchased. For example, as an underwriter, or, with respect to equity securities, a block positioner, we may commit to purchasing securities from an issuer or one or more holders of the issuer's securities without having found purchasers for some or all of the securities. In those instances, we may find thatextent we are unable to sellattract, retain, and develop productive employees, given the securitiesrelatively small size of our company and our employee base compared to some of our competitors and the geographic locations in which we operate. The primary sources of revenue in each of our business lines are fees earned on advisory and underwriting transactions and customer accounts managed by our employees, who have historically been recruited by other firms and in certain cases are able to take their client relationships with them when they change firms. Some specialized areas of our business are operated by a relatively small number of employees, the loss of any of whom could jeopardize the continuation of that business following the employee's departure, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Further, recruiting and retention success often depends on the ability to deliver competitive compensation, and we may be at a price equaldisadvantage to some competitors given our size and financial resources. Our inability or above the price at which we purchased the securities,unwillingness to meet compensation needs or with respect to certain securities, at a price sufficient to cover our hedges.

We also engage in proprietary trading activities (which we also refer to as "strategic trading" in this Form 10-K) related to municipal bonds. Proprietary trading has been a meaningful contributor to our overall financial results. In addition to proprietary trading, we engage in principal investing, having established alternative asset management funds for merchant banking (focused on investmentsdemands may result in the equityloss of some of our professionals or the inability to recruit additional professionals at compensation levels that are within our target range for compensation and debt instrumentsbenefits expense. Our ability to retain and recruit also may be hindered if we limit our aggregate annual compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of private companies)annual net revenues.

A vibrant and senior living construction projects. We have invested firm capitalethical corporate culture is critical to ensuring that our employees put our clients' interests first and are able to identify and manage potential conflicts of interest, while also creating an environment in these funds alongside capital raised from outside investors, and intend to continuewhich each of our employees feel empowered to develop these alternative assetand pursue their full potential. Our expectations for our corporate culture and ethics are instilled and maintained by the "tone at the top" set by our management strategies. These investments comprise a meaningful percentageand board of our Level III assets. Level III assets have little or no pricing observability, and may be less liquid than other securities that we holddirectors. Lapses in our securities inventory. Additionally, we make principal investments in funds managed by ARI,corporate culture could lead to reputational damage or employee loss, either of which could adversely affect our asset management subsidiary, which are generally invested in publicly traded equities.results of operations.


Our results from these activities may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. We may incur significant losses frombusiness success depends in large part on the strategic decisions made by our underwriting, proprietary trading, and principal investments due to equity or fixed income market fluctuations and volatility from quarter to quarter. For example, in 2015, our principal investments in ARI funds focused on MLPs and other investments related to the energy sector, and, as a result, suffered significant declines related to the ongoing downturn in that sector. In addition, we may engage in hedging transactions that, if not successful, could result in losses;leadership team, and the hedges we purchasebusiness plans developed and implemented by our senior business leaders. Our ability to counterbalance market rate changes in certain inventory positions are not perfectly matched to the positions being hedged, which could result in losses. With respect to principal investing, there often is not an established liquid trading market for these investments or our investments may be otherwise subject to restrictions on sale or hedging,identify, develop, and retain future senior business leaders, and our ability to withdrawdevelop and implement successful succession plans for our capital from these investmentsleadership team and other senior business leaders, is critical to our future success and results of operations.

Our inability to effectively integrate and retain personnel in connection with our acquisitions may be limited, increasingadversely affect our riskfinancial condition and results of losses. Also, our merchant banking activity involves investmentsoperations.

We invest time and resources in late stage private companies,carefully assessing opportunities for acquisitions, and we may be unablehave made acquisitions in the past several years to broaden the scope and depth of our human capital in various businesses, including our acquisition of Weeden & Co. in 2019 and of Sandler O'Neill in 2020. Despite diligence and integration planning, acquisitions still present certain risks, including the difficulties in integrating and bringing together different work cultures and employees, and retaining those employees for the period of time necessary to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Difficulties in integrating our investment objectives by sale or other disposition at attractive prices.acquisitions, including attracting and retaining talent to realize the expected benefits of these acquisitions, may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.


Use of derivative instruments as partLiquidity and Credit Risk

Two of our financialprincipal categories of risk management techniques may not effectively hedge the risks associated with activities in certain of our businesses.

We use interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, credit default swap index contracts and option contracts as a means to managebroker dealer are liquidity and credit risk, in certain inventory positions and to facilitate customer transactions. With respect to risk management, we enter into derivative contracts to hedge interest rate and market value risks associated with our security positions, including fixed income inventory positions we hold both for facilitating client activity as well as for our own proprietary trading operations. The instruments use interest rates based upon the Municipal Market Data ("MMD"), LIBOR or SIFMA index. We also enter into credit default swap index contracts to hedge risks associated with our taxable fixed income securities, and option contracts to hedge market value risk associated with convertible securities and mortgage-backed securities. Generally, we do not hedge alleach of our interest rate risk. In addition, these hedging strategies may not work in all market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate and market value risk, especially when market volatility reduces the correlation between a hedging vehicle and the securities inventory being hedged.

There are risks inherent in our use of these products, including counterparty exposure and basis risk. Counterparty exposure refers to the risk that the amount of collateral in our possession on any given day may not be sufficient to fully cover the current value of the swaps if a counterparty were to suddenly default. Basis risk refers to risks associated with swaps where changes in the value

of the swaps may not exactly mirror changes in the value of the cash flows they are hedging. We may incur losses from our exposure to derivative interest rate products and the increased use of these products in the future.

The use of estimates and valuations in measuring fair value involve significant estimation and judgment by management.

We make various estimates that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Broadly, those estimates are used in measuring fair value of certain financial instruments, investments in private companies, accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, establishing provisions for potential losses that may arise from litigation, and regulatory proceedings and tax examinations. Estimates are based on available information and judgment. Therefore, actual results could differ from our estimates and that difference couldwhich can have a material effectimpact on our consolidated financial statements.

Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased, are recorded at fair value, and unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments' complexity. Difficult market environments, such as those experienced in 2008, may cause financial instruments to become substantially more illiquid and difficult to value, increasing the use of valuation models. Our future results of operations and viability as a business. We believe that the effective management of liquidity and credit is fundamental to the financial condition may be adversely affected by the valuation adjustments that we applyhealth of our firm. With respect to these financial instruments.

Investments in private companies are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering rounds of financing, third party transactions and market-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA")) and changes in market outlook, among other factors. These valuation techniques require significant management estimation and judgment.

Liquidity Risks

We face liquidity risk, both with respectit impacts our ability to timely access necessary funding sources in order to operate our business and our ability to timely divest securities that we hold in connection with our market-making, sales and trading, and proprietary trading activities,activities. Credit risk, as well asdistinguished from liquidity risk, is the potential for loss due to the default or deterioration in credit quality of a counterparty, customer, client, borrower, or issuer of securities we hold in our ability to timely access necessary funding sources in order to operate our business. Lossestrading inventory. The nature and amount of credit risk depends on the type of transaction, the structure and duration of that we suffer on securities that we cannot timely divest, or inability to obtain necessary funding could negatively affect our future financial condition or results of operations.transaction and the parties involved. The following are those marketthe liquidity and credit risk factors that we have identified as posing the most significant risks to us.

An inability to readily divest trading positions may result in financial losses to our business.

Timely divestiture of our trading positions, including equity, fixed income and other securities positions, can be impaired by decreased trading volume, increased price volatility, rapid changes in interest rates, concentrated trading positions, limitations on the ability to divest positions in highly specialized or structured transactions and changes in industry and government regulations. This is true both for customer transactions that we facilitate as well as proprietary trading positions that we maintain. While we hold a security, we are vulnerable to valuation fluctuations and may experience financial losses to the extent the value of the security decreases and we are unable to timely divest or hedge our trading position in that security. The value may decline as a result of many factors, including issuer-specific, market or geopolitical events. In addition, in times of market uncertainty, the inability to divest inventory positions may have an impact on our liquidity as funding sources generally become more restrictive, which would limit our ability to pledge the underlying security as collateral. Our liquidity may also be impacted if we choose to facilitate liquidity for specific products and voluntarily increase our inventory positions in order to do so, exposing ourselves to greater market risk and potential financial losses from the reduction in value of illiquid positions.

An inability to access capital readily or on terms favorable to us could impair our ability to fund operations and could jeopardize our financial condition and results of operations.


Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to our business. Several large financial institutions failed or merged with others during the credit crisis following significant declines in asset values in securities held by these institutions, with Lehman Brothers being the most prominent example. To fund our business, we rely on financing provided by Pershing LLC ("Pershing") under our fully disclosed clearing agreement, as well as bank financing, commercial paper, and bank financing as well as other funding sources such as the repurchase markets. Our banksources. The financing includes uncommitted credit lines, whichprovided by Pershing is at Pershing's discretion (i.e., uncommitted) and could become unavailable to us on relatively shortbe denied without prior notice. In an effort toTo help mitigate this funding risk, during 2019, the Company issued $175 million of unsecured fixed rate senior notes as financing for general corporate purposes, including to finance a portion of our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill in early 2020. We also entered into an unsecured $50 million revolving credit facility that we intend to use for working capital and general corporate purposes. Our broker dealer subsidiary also renewed a $200$125 million committed credit facility in December 20162019 for anotheran additional twelve months. We also have $175 million of unsecured notes. The notes consist of two classes, with

$125 million maturing in October 2018 and $50 million maturing in May 2017. In order to further diversify our short-term funding needs, we also continue to maintain three commercial paper programs in the amounts of $300 million, $150 million, and $125 million.


Our access to funding sources, particularly uncommitted funding sources, could be hindered by many factors, and many of theseis dependent on factors we cannot control, such as economic downturns, the disruption of financial markets, the failure or consolidation of other financial institutions, negative news about the financial industry generally or us specifically. We could experience disruptions with our credit facilities in the future, including the loss of liquidity sources and/or increased borrowing costs, if lenders or investors develop a negative perception of our short- or long-term financial prospects, which could result from decreased business activity. Our liquidity also could be impacted by the activities resulting in concentration of risk, including proprietary activities from long-term investments and/or investments in specific markets or products without liquidity. Our access to funds also may be impaired if regulatory authorities take significant action against us, or if we discover that one of our employees has engaged in serious unauthorized or illegal activity.


In the future, we may need to incur debt or issue equity in order to fund our working capital requirements, as well as to execute our growth initiatives that may include acquisitions and other investments. Similarly, our access to funding sources may be contingent upon terms and conditions that may limit or restrict our business activities and growth initiatives. For example, the unsecured notes discussed above include covenants that, among other things, limit our leverage ratio and require maintenance of certain levels of tangible net worth, regulatory net capital, and operating cash flow to fixed charges. In addition, we currently do not have a credit rating, which could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position by increasing our borrowing costs and limiting access to sources of liquidity that require a credit rating as a condition to providing funds.


If we are unable to obtain necessary funding, or if the funding we obtain is on terms and conditions unfavorable to us, it could negatively affect our business activities and operations, and our ability to pursue certain growth initiatives and make certain capital decisions, including the decision whether to pay future dividends to our shareholders, as well as our future financial condition or results of operations.


Credit Risks

Our business hasConcentration of risk increases the potential for loss duesignificant losses.

Concentration of risk increases the potential for significant losses in our sales and trading, proprietary trading, alternative asset management, merchant banking, credit underwriting and syndication platform, and underwriting businesses. We have committed capital to the default or deteriorationthese businesses, and we may take substantial positions in credit quality of a counterparty, customer, borrower or issuerparticular types of securities we holdand/or issuers. This concentration of risk may cause us to suffer losses even when economic and market conditions are generally favorable for our competitors. Further, disruptions in our trading inventory. The naturethe credit markets can make it difficult to hedge exposures effectively and amount of credit risk depends on the type of transaction, the structure and duration of that transaction and the parties involved. For example, credit risk associated with our derivatives is the risk that a counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. In addition, our business has credit risk from an obligor's failure to meet the terms of any contract with the company or otherwise fail to perform as agreed. This may be reflected on issues like settlement obligations or payment collections (e.g., margin and investment banking receivables).economically.


Our businesses, profitability and liquidity may be adversely affected by deterioration in the credit quality of, or defaults by, third parties who owe us money, securities or other assets.


The nature of our businesses exposes us to credit risk, or the risk that third parties who owe us money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations. These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons. Deterioration in the credit quality of securities or obligations we hold could result in losses and adversely affect our ability to rehypothecate or otherwise use those securities or obligations for liquidity purposes. A significant downgrade in the credit ratings of our counterparties could also have a negative impact on our results. Default rates, downgrades and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of collateral tend to increase in times of market stress and illiquidity. Although we review credit exposures to specific clients and counterparties and to specific industries that we believe may present credit concerns, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee. Also, concerns about, or a default by, one institution generally leads to losses, significant liquidity problems, or defaults by other institutions, which in turn could adversely affectsaffect our business.


Particular activities or products within our business expose us to increased credit risk, including inventory positions, interest rate swap contracts with customer credit exposure, counterparty risk with one major financial institution related to customer interest rate swap contracts without customer credit exposure, investment banking and advisory fee receivables, customer margin accounts, liquidity providers on variable rate demand notes we remarket, and trading counterparty activities related to settlement and similar activities. With respect to interest rate swap contracts with customer credit exposure, we have retained the credit exposure with five public financenon-publicly rated counterparties totaling $22.7$19.2 million at December 31, 20162019 as part of our matched-book interest rate swap program. In the event of a termination of the contract, the counterparty would owe us the applicable amount of the credit exposure. If our counterparty is unable to make its payment to us, we would still be obligated to pay our hedging counterparty, resulting in

credit losses. Non-performance by our counterparties, clients and others, including with respect to our inventory positions and interest rate swap contracts with customer credit exposures, could result in losses, potentially material, and thus have a significant adverse effect on our business and results of operations.


In addition, reliance on revenues from hedge funds and hedge fund advisors, which are less regulated than many investment company and investment advisor clients, may expose us to greater risk of financial loss from unsettled trades than is the case with other types of institutional investors. Concentration of risk may result in losses to us even when economic and market conditions are generally favorable for others in our industry.


ConcentrationAn inability to readily divest trading positions may result in financial losses to our business.

Timely divestiture of risk increasesour trading positions, including equity, fixed income and other securities positions, can be impaired by decreased trading volume, increased price volatility, rapid changes in interest rates, concentrated trading positions, limitations on the potential for significant losses.

Concentration of risk increases the potential for significant losses in our sales and trading, proprietary trading, alternative asset management, merchant banking, and underwriting businesses. We have committed capitalability to these businesses, and we may take substantialdivest positions in particular types of securities and/highly specialized or issuers.structured transactions and changes in industry and government regulations. This concentration of risk may cause us to suffer losses even when economic and market conditions are generally favorableis true both for our competitors. Further, disruptions in the credit markets can make it difficult to hedge exposures effectively and economically.

Human Capital Risks

Our business is a human capital business, and, therefore, our future financial condition and results of operations are significantly dependent upon our employees and their actions. Our success is dependent upon the skills, expertise, and performance of our employees. Human capital risks represent the risks posed ifcustomer transactions that we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals who are motivated to serve the best interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company,facilitate as well as the risks posed if our culture fails to encourage such behavior. Human capital risk is also present where we fail to detect and prevent employees from acting contrary to our policies and procedures. The following are those human capital risk factorsproprietary trading positions that we have identified as posing the most significant risksmaintain. While we hold a security, we are vulnerable to us.

Our ability to attract, developvaluation fluctuations and retain highly skilled and productive employees, and develop the next generation of our business leadership is criticalmay experience financial losses to the successextent the value of our business.

Historically, the market for qualified employees within the financial services industry has been marked by intense competition,security decreases and the performance of our business may suffer to the extent we are unable to attracttimely divest or hedge our trading position in that security. The value may decline as a result of many factors, including issuer-specific, market or geopolitical events. In addition, in times of market uncertainty, the inability to divest inventory positions may have an impact on our liquidity as funding sources generally become more restrictive, which could limit our ability to pledge the underlying security as collateral. Our liquidity may also be impacted if we choose to facilitate liquidity for specific products and retain employees effectively, particularly givenvoluntarily increase our inventory positions in order to do so, exposing ourselves to greater market risk and potential financial losses from the relatively small sizereduction in value of our companyilliquid positions.

Our underwriting, proprietary trading, and our employee base comparedalternative asset management activities expose us to somerisk of our competitors and the geographic locationsloss.

We engage in a variety of activities in which we operate. The primary sourcescommit or invest our own capital, including underwriting, proprietary trading, and alternative asset management. In our role as underwriter for equity and fixed income securities, we commit to purchase securities from the issuer or one or more holders of revenue in each of our business lines are commissionsthe issuer's securities, and fees earned on advisory andthen sell those securities to other investors or into the public markets, as applicable. Our underwriting activities, including bought deal transactions and customer accounts managed by our employees, who have historically been recruited by other firms and in certain casesequity block trading activities, expose us to the risk of loss if the price of the security falls below the price we purchased the security before we are able to take their client relationshipssell all of the securities that we purchased. For example, as an underwriter, or, with them when they change firms. Some specialized areasrespect to equity securities, a block positioner, we may commit to purchasing securities from an issuer or one or more holders of the issuer's securities without having found purchasers for some or all of the securities. In those instances, we may find that we are unable to sell the securities at a price equal to or above the price at which we purchased the securities, or with respect to certain securities, at a price sufficient to cover our business are operated by a relatively small number of employees, the loss of any of whom could jeopardize the continuation of that business following the employee's departure.

Further, recruiting and retention success often depends on thehedges. With respect to alternative asset management, our ability to deliver competitive compensation,withdraw our capital from these investments may be limited, and we may not be able to realize our investment objectives by sale or disposition at attractive prices, increasing our risk of losses. Our joint venture entities that underwrite and syndicate client debt hold a disadvantageportion of such debt after syndication, and our invested capital is exposed to some competitors givena risk of loss to the extent that the debt is ultimately not repaid.

Our results from these activities may vary from quarter to quarter. We may incur significant losses from our sizeunderwriting, proprietary trading, and financial resources. Our inabilityalternative asset management due to equity or unwillingnessfixed income market fluctuations and volatility from quarter to meet compensation needsquarter, or demandsfrom a deterioration in specific business subsectors or the economy more generally. In addition, we may engage in hedging transactions that, if not successful, could result in losses; and the losshedges we purchase to counterbalance market rate changes in certain inventory positions are not perfectly matched to the positions being hedged, which could result in losses.


Use of somederivative instruments as part of our professionals orfinancial risk management techniques may not effectively hedge the inability to recruit additional professionals at compensation levels that are withinrisks associated with activities in certain of our target range for compensationbusinesses.

We use interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and benefits expense. Our ability to retainU.S. Treasury bond futures and recruit also may be hindered if we limit our aggregate annual compensation and benefits expenseoptions as a percentagemeans to manage risk in certain inventory positions and to facilitate customer transactions. With respect to risk management, we enter into derivative contracts to hedge interest rate and market value risks associated with our security positions, including fixed income inventory positions we hold both for facilitating client activity as well as for our own proprietary trading operations. The instruments currently use interest rates based upon the Municipal Market Data ("MMD"), London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") index. Generally, we do not hedge all of annual net revenues.

Our business success dependsour interest rate risk. In addition, these hedging strategies may not work in large part onall market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate and market value risk, especially when market volatility reduces the strategic decisions made by our leadership team,correlation between a hedging vehicle and the business plans developedsecurities inventory being hedged.

There are risks inherent in our use of these products, including counterparty exposure and implementedbasis risk. Counterparty exposure refers to the risk that the amount of collateral in our possession on any given day may not be sufficient to fully cover the current value of the swaps if a counterparty were to suddenly default. Basis risk refers to risks associated with swaps where changes in the value of the swaps may not exactly mirror changes in the value of the cash flows they are hedging. We may incur losses from our exposure to derivative interest rate products and the increased use of these products in the future.

The use of estimates and valuations in measuring fair value involve significant estimation and judgment by management.

We make various estimates that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Broadly, those estimates are used in measuring fair value of certain financial instruments, investments in private companies, accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, establishing provisions for potential losses that may arise from litigation, and regulatory proceedings and tax examinations. Estimates are based on available information and judgment. Therefore, actual results could differ from our senior business leaders. Our abilityestimates and that difference could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. With respect to identify, develop,accounting for goodwill, we complete our annual goodwill and retain future senior business leaders, andintangible asset impairment testing in the fourth quarter of each year or earlier if impairment indicators are present. Impairment charges resulting from this valuation analysis could materially adversely affect our ability to develop and implement successful succession plans for our CEO and leadership team, is critical to our future success and results of operations.


Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased, are recorded at fair value, and unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments' complexity. Difficult market environments may cause financial instruments to become substantially more illiquid and difficult to value, increasing the use of valuation models. Our inability to effectively integratefuture results of operations and retain personnel in connection with our acquisitions may adversely affect our financial condition may be adversely affected by the valuation adjustments that we apply to these financial instruments.

Investments in private companies are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering rounds of financing, third party transactions and resultsmarket-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of operations.revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA")) and changes in market outlook, among other factors. These valuation techniques require significant management estimation and judgment.

We invest time and resources in carefully assessing opportunities for acquisitions, and we have made acquisitions in the past several years to broaden the scope and depth of our human capital in various businesses. Despite diligence and integration planning, acquisitions still present certain risks, including the difficulties in integrating and bringing together different work cultures and employees, and retaining those employees for the period of time necessary to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.

Difficulties in integrating our acquisitions, including attracting and retaining talent to realize the expected benefits of these acquisitions, may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.


Operational RisksRisk


Operational risk is the risk of loss, or damage to our reputation, resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people and systems or from external events. Such loss or reputational damage could negatively impact our future financial condition and results of operations. The following are those operational risk factors that we have identified as posing the most significant risks to us.


Our information and technology systems, including outsourced systems, are critical components of our operations, and failure of those systems or other aspects of our operations infrastructure may disrupt our business, cause financial loss and constrain our growth.


We typically transact thousands of securities trades on a daily basis across multiple markets. Our data and transaction processing, custody, financial, accounting and other technology and operating systems are essential to this task. A system malfunction (due to hardware failure, capacity overload, security incident, data corruption, etc.) or mistake made relating to the processing of transactions could result in financial loss, liability to clients, regulatory intervention, reputational damage and constraints on our ability to grow.

We outsourceoperate under a substantial portionfully disclosed model for all of our clearing operations. In a fully disclosed model, we act as an introducing broker for most customer transactions and rely on a clearing broker dealer to handle clearance and settlement of our customers' securities transactions. The clearing services provided by our clearing broker dealer, Pershing, are critical data processing activities, including trade processingto our business operations, and back office data processing. For example,similar to other important outsourced operations, any failure by the clearing agent with respect to the services we have entered into contracts with Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge"), pursuantrely on it to which Broadridge handlesprovide could significantly disrupt and negatively impact our tradeoperations and back office processing, and Unisys Corporation ("Unisys"), pursuant to which Unisys supports our data center and helpdesk needs.financial results. We also contract with third parties for market data services, which constantly broadcast news, quotes, analytics and other relevant information to our employees. We contract withemployees, as well as other vendors to produce and mail our customer statements and to provide other services.critical data processing activities. In the event that any of these service providers fails to adequately perform such services or the relationship between that service provider and us is terminated, we may experience a significant disruption in our operations, including our ability to timely and accurately process transactions or maintain complete and accurate records of those transactions.

In 2017, we have made the strategic decision to move to a fully disclosed model for all of our currently self clearing broker dealer operations. In a fully disclosed model, we will act as an introducing broker for most customer transactions and rely on a clearing broker dealer to handle clearance and settlement of our customers' securities transactions. We expect the conversion to occur in the second half of 2017. The conversion process introduces unique risks that could cause significant disruptions in our business or create other unexpected capital charges or losses. Once the conversion is completed, the clearing services provided by the clearing broker dealer will be critical to our business operations, and similar to other critical outsourced operations, any failure by the clearing agent with respect to the services we will rely on it to provide could significantly disrupt and negatively impact our operations and financial results.


Adapting or developing our technology systems to meet new regulatory requirements, client needs, geographic expansion and industry demands also is critical for our business. IntroductionThe introduction of new technologies presentpresents new challenges on a regular basis. We have an ongoing need to upgrade and improve our various technology systems, including our data and transaction processing, financial, accounting, risk management, compliance, and trading systems. This need could present operational issues or require significant capital spending. It also may require us to make additional investments in technology systems and may require us to reevaluate the current value and/or expected useful lives of our technology systems, which could negatively impact our results of operations.


A disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business due to fire, natural disaster, health emergency (for example,(e.g., a disease pandemic), power or communication failure, act of terrorism or war may affect our ability to service and interact with our clients. If we are not able to implement contingency plans effectively, any such disruption could harm our results of operations.


Protection of our sensitive and confidential information is critical to our operations, and failure of those systems may disrupt our business, damage our reputations,reputation, and cause financial losses.


Our clients routinely provide us with sensitive and confidential information. Secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our internal and outsourced computer systems and networks is critically important to our business. We take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant. However, our computer systems, software and networks, and those of our clients, vendors, service providers, counterparties and other third parties, may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, cyberattacks,cyber attacks, security breaches, computer viruses or other malicious code, inadvertent, erroneous or intercepted transmission of information (including by e-mail), human error, and other events that could have an information security impact. We work with our employees, clients, vendors, service providers, counterparties and other third parties to develop secure transmission

capabilities and implement measures designed to protect against these events,such an event, but we may not be able to fully protect against such an event, and do not have, and may be unable to put in place, secure capabilities with all of these third parties and we may not be able to ensure that these third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information. If one or more of such events occur, this potentially could jeopardize our or our clients' or counterparties' confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or those of third parties, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our clients', our counterparties' or third parties' operations. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to reputational harm as well as litigation, regulatory penalties, and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us.

A failure to protect our computer systems, networks and information, and our clients' information, against cyber attacks, data breaches, and similar threats could impair our ability to conduct our businesses, result in the disclosure, theft or destruction of confidential information, damage our reputation and cause significant financial and legal exposure.

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. There have been several highly publicized cases involving financial services companies, consumer-based companies and other companies, as well as governmental and political organizations, reporting breaches in the security of their websites, networks or other systems. We have not been immune from such events. Some of the publicized breaches have involved sophisticated and targeted cyber attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage, including through the introduction of computer viruses, malware, ransomware, phishing, denial-of-service, and other means. There have also been several highly publicized cases where hackers have requested "ransom" payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information.


A successful penetration or circumvention of the security of our systems could cause serious negative consequences for us, including significant disruption of our operations and those of our clients, customers and counterparties; misappropriation of our confidential information or that of our clients, customers, counterparties or employees; or damage to our computers or systems and those of our clients, customers and counterparties; and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to us or to our customers, loss of confidence in our security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure and reputational harm, all of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We continuously monitor and develop our systems to protect our technology infrastructure and data from misappropriation or corruption. Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems and information, we have not been and may not be able to anticipate, detect or implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats, especially because the techniques used are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently, and are often not recognized until months after the attack. Cyber attacks can originate from a variety of sources, including third parties who are affiliated with foreign governments or employees acting negligently or in a manner adverse to our interests. Third parties may seek to gain access to our systems either directly or using equipment or security passwords belonging to employees, customers, third party service providers or other users of our systems. In addition, due to our interconnectivity with third party vendors, central agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial institutions, we could be adversely impacted if any of them are subject to a successful cyber attack or other information security event.

Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks have been and may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could have a security impact. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities, exposures, or information security events. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our systems, the process of enhancing our protective measures can itself create a risk of systems disruptions and security issues.

The increased use of cloud technologies can heighten these and other operational risks. Certain aspects of the security of such technologies are unpredictable or beyond our control, and this lack of transparency may inhibit our ability to discover a failure by cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems and prevent cyber attacks that could disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential and other information. In addition, there is a risk that encryption and other protective measures, despite their sophistication, may be defeated, particularly to the extent that new computing technologies vastly increase the speed and computing power available.

Risk management processes may not fully mitigate exposure to the various risks that we face.

We refine our risk management techniques, strategies and assessment methods on an ongoing basis. However, risk management techniques and strategies, both ours and those available to the market generally, may not be fully effective in identifying and mitigating our risk exposure in all economic market environments or against all types of risk. For example, we may fail to identify or anticipate particular risks that our systems are capable of identifying, or the systems that we use, and that are used within the industry generally, may not be capable of identifying certain risks, or every economic and financial outcome, or the specifics and timing of such outcomes. In addition, our risk management techniques and strategies seek to balance our ability to profit from our market-making and investing positions with our exposure to potential losses. Some of our strategies for managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior. We apply statistical and other tools to these observations to quantify our risk exposure. Any failures in our risk management techniques and strategies to accurately quantify our risk exposure could limit our ability to manage risks. In addition, any risk management failures could cause our losses to be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. Further, our quantified modeling does not take all risks into account. Our more qualitative approach to managing those risks could prove insufficient, exposing us to material unanticipated losses.

The financial services industry and the markets in which we operate are subject to systemic risk that could adversely affect our business and results.

Participants in the financial services industry and markets increasingly are closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing, technology and other relationships between them. A significant adverse development with one participant (such as a bankruptcy or default) may spread to others and lead to significant concentrated or market-wide problems (such as defaults, liquidity problems or losses) for other industry participants, including us. Further, the control and risk management infrastructure of the markets in which we operate often is outpaced by financial innovation and growth in new types of securities, transactions and markets. Systemic risk is inherently difficult to assess and quantify, and its form and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time.


Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could materially affect our business.

We have documented and tested our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent auditors regarding our internal control over financial reporting. We are in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as of December 31, 2019. However, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could materially adversely affect our business.
Legal and Regulatory RisksRisk


Legal and regulatory risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the loss to our reputation we may suffer as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards and codes of conduct applicable to our business activities. It also includes the risk that legislation could reduce or eliminate certain business activities that we are currently engaged in, which could negatively impact our future financial condition or results of operation. The following are those legal and regulatory risk factors that we have identified as posing the most significant risks to us.


Our exposureindustry is exposed to significant legal liability, is significant, andwhich could lead to substantial damages.


We face significant legal risks in our businesses. These risks include potential liability under securities laws and regulations in connection with our capital markets, asset management and other businesses. The volume and amount of damages claimed in litigation, arbitrations, regulatory enforcement actions and other adversarial proceedings against financial services firms remainshas historically been intense. Our experience has been that adversarial proceedings against financial services firms typically increase during and following a market downturn. We also are subject to claims from disputes with our employees and our former employees under various circumstances. Risks associated with legal liability often are difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time, making the amount of legal reserves related to these legal liabilities difficult to determine and subject to future revision. Legal or regulatory matters involving our directors, officers or employees in their individual capacities also may create exposure for us because we may be obligated or may choose to indemnify the affected individuals against liabilities and expenses they incur in connection with such matters to the extent permitted under applicable law. In addition, like other financial services companies, we may face the possibility of employee fraud or misconduct. The precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases and there can be no assurance that we will be able to deter or prevent fraud or misconduct. Exposures from and expenses incurred related to any of the foregoing actions or proceedings could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, future results of operations could be adversely affected if reserves relating to these legal liabilities are required to be increased or legal proceedings are resolved in excess of established reserves.


Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and a significant regulatory action against our company may have a material adverse financial effect on, cause significant reputational harm to, or result in other collateral consequences for our company.


As a participant in the financial services industry, we are subject to complex and extensive regulation of many aspects of our business by U.S. federal and state regulatory agencies, self-regulatory organizationsSROs (including securities exchanges) and by foreign governmental agencies, regulatory bodies and securities exchanges. Specifically, our operating subsidiaries include broker dealer and related securities entities organized in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Hong Kong. Each of these entities is registered or licensed with the applicable local regulator and is subject to all of the applicable rules and regulations promulgated by those authorities. In addition, our asset management subsidiaries, ARI, PJIM, and PJCPSC Capital Partners LLC, and Piper Sandler Advisors LLC, as well as Piper JaffraySandler & Co., are registered as investment advisors with the SEC and subject to the regulation and oversight by the SEC, and we have an additional asset management subsidiary subject to regulation in Guernsey.


Generally, the requirements imposed by our regulators are designed to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect customers and other third parties who deal with us. These requirements are not designed to protect our shareholders. Consequently, broker dealer regulations often serve to limit our activities, through net capital, customer protection and market conduct requirements and restrictions on the businesses in which we may operate or invest. We also must comply with asset management regulations, including requirements related to fiduciary duties to clients, record-keeping and reporting and customer disclosures. Compliance with many of these regulations entails a number of risks, particularly in areas where applicable regulations may be newer or unclear. In addition, regulatory authorities in all jurisdictions in which we conduct business may intervene in our business and we and our employees could be fined or otherwise disciplined for violations or prohibited from engaging in some of our business activities.


Our business also subjects us to the complex income and payroll tax laws of the national and local jurisdictions in which we have business operations, and these tax laws may be subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining the provision for income and other taxes. We are subject to contingent tax risk that could adversely affect our results of operations, to the extent that our interpretations of tax laws are disputed upon examination or audit, and are settled in amounts in excess of established reserves for such contingencies.


The effort to combat money laundering also has become a high priority in governmental policy with respect to financial institutions. The obligation of financial institutions, including ourselves, to identify their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions, has required the implementation and maintenance of internal practices, procedures and controls which have increased, and may continue to increase, our costs. Any failure with respect to our programs in this area could subject us to serious regulatory consequences, including substantial fines, and potentially other liabilities. In addition, our international operations require compliance with anti-bribery laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010. These laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from engaging in bribery or making other improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining an unfair business advantage. While our employees and agents are required to comply with these laws, we cannot ensure that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from intentional, reckless or negligent acts committed by our employees or agents, which acts could subject our company to fines or other regulatory consequences that could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our results of operations.


Legislative and regulatory proposals could significantly curtail the revenue from certain products that we currently provide.provide or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.


Proposed changes in laws or regulations relating to our business could decrease, perhaps significantly, the revenue that we receive from certain products or services that we provide.provide, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, federal law currently allows investorsthe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the tax-exemption for advance refunding bonds, which are bonds issued by local or state governments to refinance outstanding bonds before the original bonds are callable in debt issuances by government and non-profit entitiesorder to excludetake advantage of lower borrowing costs. To the bond interest for federal income tax purposes, resulting in lower interest expense for the issuer as compared to a taxable financing. In recent years, federal lawmakers have presented various proposals to limit or eliminate the tax-exempt status ofextent that this bond interest. Our public finance investment banking business receives significant revenues as a result of underwriting activity in connection with debt issuances by government and non-profit clients, primarily on a tax-exempt basis. Also, a significant percentage of our securities inventory - both positions held for client activity and our own proprietary trading positions - consist of municipal securities. Any reduction or elimination of tax-exempt bond interest,tax-exemption, or a reductionany other component of legislation that may be enacted in individual income tax rates, could negatively impact the valuefuture (whether at the local, state, or federal level), reduces the total amount of the municipal securitiesissuances or other financing activities for which we hold incompete, our securities inventory as well as our public finance investment banking business more generally, which would negatively impact the results of operations for these businesses.could be adversely affected.


The business operations that we conduct outside of the United States subject us to unique risks.


To the extent thatWhen we conduct business outside the United States, for example in Asia and Europe, we are subject to risks, including, without limitation, the risk that we will be unable to provide effective operational support to these business activities, the risk of noncompliance with foreign laws and regulations, and the general economic and political conditions in countries where we conduct business, which may differ significantly from those in the United States. In January 2018, new regulations adopted in the European Union required the unbundling of equity trading and research fees, among other requirements, which has impacted the way that our equity institutional business receives fees from our European clients and may have an impact on our U.S. business over time. Also, the effect of Brexit is still developing and could require us to obtain additional regulatory licenses or impose new restrictions on our ability to conduct business in Europe.


Regulatory capital requirements may limit our ability to expand or maintain our present levels of business or impair our ability to meet our financial obligations.


We are subject to the SEC's uniform net capital rule (Rule 15c3-1) and the net capital rule of FINRA, which may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital from Piper JaffraySandler & Co., our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary. The uniform net capital rule sets the minimum level of net capital a broker dealer must maintain and also requires that a portion of its assets be relatively liquid. FINRA may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying cash dividends if resulting net capital falls below its requirements. Underwriting commitments require a charge against net capital and, accordingly, our ability to make underwriting commitments may be limited by the requirement that we must at all times be in compliance with the applicable net capital regulations.


As Piper JaffraySandler Companies is a holding company, it depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries to fund its obligations. The regulatory restrictions described above may impede access to funds our holding company needs to make payments on any such obligations.


Other Risks to Our Shareholders


The following are additional risk factors that we have identified as posing the most significant risks to our shareholders:

We may change our dividend policy at any time and there can be no assurance that we will continue to declare cash dividends.


Beginning in 2017, we are initiating the payment of aOur current dividend policy is to pay quarterly and annual cash dividenddividends to our shareholders in order to return between 30 percent and 50 percent of our adjusted net income from each fiscal year to shareholders. Although we expect to pay dividends to our shareholders in accordance with our dividend policy, we have no obligation to pay any dividend, and our dividend policy may change at any time without notice. The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and capital uses, limitations imposed by our indebtedness, legal requirements and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. As a result, we may not pay dividends at any rate or at all.


Our stock price may fluctuate as a result of several factors, including but not limited to, changes in our revenues, operating results, tangible book value and return on equity.


We have experienced, and expect to experience in the future, fluctuations in the market price of our common stock due to factors that relate to the nature of our business, including but not limited to changes in our revenues, operating results, tangible book value,earnings per share, and return on equity. Our business, by its nature, does not produce steady and predictable earnings on a quarterly basis, which causesmay cause fluctuations in our stock price that may be significant. Other factors that have affected, and may further affect, our stock price include changes in or news related to economic, political, or market events or conditions, changes in market conditions in the financial services industry, including developments in regulation affecting our business, a predominantly passive or quantitative shareholder base among the company's top twenty shareholders, failure to meet the expectations of market analysts, changes in recommendations or outlooks by market analysts, and aggressive short selling similar to that experienced in the financial industry in 2008.selling.


Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the market value of our common stock.


Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to deter abusive takeover tactics by making them unacceptably expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include limitations on our shareholders' ability to act by written consent and to call special meetings. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15 percent or more of our outstanding common stock. We believe these provisions protect our shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal, and are not intended to make our company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors determines is not in the best interests of our company and our shareholders.


ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.


None.



ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES.


As of February 21, 2017,2020, we conducted our operations through 5962 principal offices in 2829 states, and the District of Columbia, and in London, Aberdeen and Hong Kong, Tokyo and Zurich.Kong. All of our offices are leased. Our principal executive office is located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 1000,900, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 and, as of February 21, 2017,2020, comprises approximately 124,000 square feet of space under a lease which expires November 30, 2025, with an early termination option effective January 31, 2022.



ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.


Due to the nature of our business, we are involved in a variety of legal proceedings. These proceedings include litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, which may arise from, among other things, underwriting or other transactional activity, client account activity, employment matters, regulatory examinations of our businesses and investigations of securities industry practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations.SROs. The securities industry is highly regulated, and the regulatory scrutiny applied to securities firms is intense, resulting in a significant number of regulatory investigations and enforcement actions and uncertainty regarding the likely outcome of these matters.


Litigation-related expenses include amounts we reserve and/or pay out as legal and regulatory settlements, awards or judgments, and fines. Parties who initiate litigation and arbitration proceedings against us may seek substantial or indeterminate damages, and regulatory investigations can result in substantial fines being imposed on us. We reserve for contingencies related to legal proceedings at the time and to the extent we determine the amount to be probable and reasonably estimable. However, it is inherently difficult to predict accurately the timing and outcome of legal proceedings, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines. We assess each proceeding based on its particular facts, our outside advisors' assessment and our past experience with similar matters, and expectations regarding the current legal and regulatory environment and other external developments that might affect the outcome of a particular proceeding or type of proceeding. Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate consultation with outside legal counsel and taking into account our established reserves, that pending legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings, will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that our assessments will reflect the ultimate outcome of pending proceedings, and the outcome of any particular matter may be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, on the operating results for that period and the amount of established reserves. Reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts accrued at December 31, 20162019 are not material. We generally have denied, or believe that we have meritorious defenses and will deny, liability in all significant cases currently pending against us, and we intend to vigorously defend such actions.


ITEM 4.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.


Not applicable.



PART II


ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDERSTOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.


Market Information

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PJC."PIPR." The following table contains historical quarterly price information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. On February 21, 2017, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $75.90.
 2016 Fiscal Year 2015 Fiscal Year
 High Low High Low
First Quarter$49.56
 $32.64
 $58.24
 $51.05
Second Quarter49.23
 35.92
 55.39
 43.45
Third Quarter48.63
 37.43
 46.24
 36.17
Fourth Quarter77.45
 48.80
 42.81
 34.40


Shareholders


We had 14,56210,669 shareholders of record and approximately 26,61325,958 beneficial owners of our common stock as of February 21, 2017.2020.


DividendsDividend Policy


We have not historically paid cash dividends on our common stock. Beginning in 2017, we are initiatinginitiated the payment of a quarterly cash dividend. In addition, our board of directors approved a dividend policy with the intention of returning between 30 percent and 50 percent of our adjusted net income from the previous fiscal year to shareholders. This includes an annual special cash dividend, payable in the first quarter of each year, beginning in 2018.

Our board of directors has declared a special cash dividend on the company's common stock of $0.3125$0.75 per share related to 2019 adjusted net income. This special dividend will be paid on March 13, 20172020, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 20, 2017. March 2, 2020. Including this special cash dividend and the regular quarterly dividends totaling $1.50 per share paid during 2019, we will have returned $2.25 per share, or approximately 33 percent of our fiscal year 2019 adjusted net income to shareholders. In addition, our board of directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend on the company's common stock of $0.375 per share to be paid on March 13, 2020, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 2, 2020.

Our board of directors is free to change our dividend policy at any time. Restrictions on our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary’ssubsidiary's ability to pay dividends are described in Note 2423 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Piper JaffraySandler Companies or any "affiliated purchaser" (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)Act), of our common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 20162019.
     Total Number of Shares Approximate Dollar     Total Number of Shares Approximate Dollar
     Purchased as Part of Value of Shares Yet to be     Purchased as Part of Value of Shares Yet to be
 Total Number of Average Price Publicly Announced Purchased Under the Total Number of Average Price Publicly Announced Purchased Under the
Period Shares Purchased Paid per Share Plans or Programs 
Plans or Programs (1)
 Shares Purchased Paid per Share Plans or Programs 
Plans or Programs (1)
Month #1                 
(October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016) 
 $
 
 $72
million
(October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019) 331
 $74.95
 
 $
Month #2                 
(November 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016) 6,521
 $66.22
 
 $72
million
(November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019) 2,821
 $76.26
 
 $
Month #3                 
(December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016) 
 $
 
 $72
million
(December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019) 
 $
 
 $
Total 6,521
 $66.22
 
 $72
million 3,152
 $76.12
 
 $
(1)Effective August 14, 2015,September 30, 2017, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of common stock, throughwhich expired on September 30, 2017.2019. On November 15, 2019, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of common stock. This authorization will be effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021.




Stock Performance Graph


This performance graph shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The following graph compares the performance of an investment in our common stock from December 31, 20112014 through December 31, 2016,2019, with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2011,2014, in each of our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index and that all dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions. The performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance.


FIVE YEAR TOTAL RETURN FOR PIPER JAFFRAYSANDLER COMPANIES COMMON STOCK,
THE S&P 500 INDEX AND THE S&P DIVERSIFIED FINANCIALS INDEX
chart-44d8f7b6ee655ce8a5b.jpg


Company/Index 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2019
Piper Jaffray Companies 100
 159.06
 195.79
 287.57
 200.00
 358.91
Piper Sandler Companies $100
 $69.55
 $124.81
 $151.29
 $119.98
 $148.64
S&P 500 Index 100
 116.00
 153.57
 174.60
 177.01
 198.18
 100
 101.38
 113.51
 138.29
 132.23
 173.86
S&P 500 Diversified Financials 100
 141.34
 199.84
 232.94
 211.75
 255.25
 100
 90.90
 109.58
 136.86
 123.28
 153.57



ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.


The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for the periods and dates indicated. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.thereto included in this Form 10-K.
For the year ended December 31,For the year ended December 31,
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017 (1) 2016 (1) 2015 (1)
                  
Revenues:                  
Investment banking$490,340
 $414,118
 $369,811
 $248,563
 $232,958
$629,392
 $588,978
 $633,837
 $490,340
 $414,118
Institutional brokerage161,186
 154,889
 156,809
 146,648
 166,642
167,891
 124,738
 154,712
 161,293
 155,192
Asset management60,672
 75,017
 85,062
 83,045
 65,699
Interest33,074
 41,557
 48,716
 50,409
 37,845
26,741
 32,749
 31,954
 33,074
 41,557
Investment income24,602
 10,736
 12,813
 21,566
 4,903
22,275
 11,039
 23,386
 31,032
 14,795
                  
Total revenues769,874
 696,317
 673,211
 550,231
 508,047
846,299
 757,504
 843,889
 715,739
 625,662
                  
Interest expense22,525
 23,399
 25,073
 25,036
 19,095
11,733
 16,551
 20,268
 22,525
 23,399
                  
Net revenues747,349
 672,918
 648,138
 525,195
 488,952
834,566
 740,953
 823,621
 693,214
 602,263
                  
Non-interest expenses:                  
Compensation and benefits510,612
 421,733
 394,510
 322,464
 296,882
516,090
 488,487
 589,637
 482,749
 388,895
Restructuring and integration costs10,206
 10,652
 
 4,689
 3,642
14,321
 3,498
 
 10,196
 
Goodwill impairment82,900
 
 
 
 
Other174,505
 154,110
 143,317
 122,429
 119,417
185,176
 176,479
 154,668
 158,625
 147,652
                  
Total non-interest expenses778,223
 586,495
 537,827
 449,582
 419,941
715,587
 668,464
 744,305
 651,570
 536,547
                  
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense(30,874) 86,423
 110,311
 75,613
 69,011
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense118,979
 72,489
 79,316
 41,644
 65,716
                  
Income tax expense/(benefit)(17,128) 27,941
 35,986
 20,390
 19,470
Income tax expense24,577
 18,046
 53,808
 10,926
 19,618
                  
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations(13,746) 58,482
 74,325
 55,223
 49,541
Income from continuing operations94,402
 54,443
 25,508
 30,718
 46,098
                  
Discontinued operations:                  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 (4,739) (5,807)
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax23,772
 1,387
 (85,060) (44,464) 12,384
                  
Net income/(loss)(13,746) 58,482
 74,325
 50,484
 43,734
118,174
 55,830
 (59,552) (13,746) 58,482
                  
Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests8,206
 6,407
 11,153
 5,394
 2,466
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests6,463
 (1,206) 2,387
 8,206
 6,407
                  
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
 $45,090
 $41,268
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939) $(21,952) $52,075
                  
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies' common shareholders$(21,952)
(1) 
$48,060
 $58,141
 $40,596
 $35,335
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies' common shareholders$107,200
 $49,993
 $(64,875)
(2) 
$(21,952)
(2) 
$48,060
                  
Continued on next page

 For the year ended December 31,
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
          
Amounts applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies         
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
 $49,829
 $47,075
Net loss from discontinued operations
 
 
 (4,739) (5,807)
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
 $45,090
 $41,268
          
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share         
Income/(loss) from continuing operations$(1.73) $3.34
 $3.88
 $2.98
 $2.58
Loss from discontinued operations
 
 
 (0.28) (0.32)
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share$(1.73) $3.34
 $3.88
 $2.70
 $2.26
          
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share         
Income/(loss) from continuing operations$(1.73) $3.34
 $3.87
 $2.98
 $2.58
Loss from discontinued operations
 
 
 (0.28) (0.32)
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share$(1.73)
(2) 
$3.34
 $3.87
 $2.70
 $2.26
          
Weighted average number of common shares         
Basic12,674
 14,368
 14,971
 15,046
 15,615
Diluted12,779
(2) 
14,389
 15,025
 15,061
 15,616
          
Other data         
Total assets$2,125,503
 $2,138,518
 $2,623,917
 $2,318,157
 $2,087,733
Long-term debt$175,000
 $175,000
 $125,000
 $125,000
 $125,000
Total common shareholders' equity$759,250
 $783,659
 $819,912
 $734,676
 $733,292
Total shareholders' equity$816,266
 $832,820
 $969,460
 $882,072
 $790,175
Total employees (3)
1,297
 1,152
 1,026
 1,026
 907
 For the year ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017 (1) 2016 (1) 2015 (1)
          
Amounts applicable to Piper Sandler Companies         
Net income from continuing operations$87,939
 $55,649
 $23,121
 $22,512
 $39,691
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations23,772
 1,387
 (85,060) (44,464) 12,384
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939) $(21,952) $52,075
          
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share         
Income from continuing operations$6.21
 $3.68
 $1.57
 $1.78
 $2.55
Income/(loss)from discontinued operations1.69
 0.09
 (6.64) (3.51) 0.80
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share$7.90
 $3.78
 $(5.07) $(1.73) $3.34
          
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share         
Income from continuing operations$6.05
 $3.63
 $1.57
 $1.76
 $2.55
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations1.65
 0.09
 (6.55) (3.48) 0.79
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share$7.69
 $3.72
 $(4.99)
(3) 
$(1.72)
(3) 
$3.34
          
Dividends declared per common share$2.51
 $3.12
 $1.25
 $
 $
          
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         
Basic13,555
 13,234
 12,807
 12,674
 14,368
Diluted13,937
 13,425
 12,978
(3) 
12,779
(3) 
14,389
          
Other data         
Total assets$1,628,719
 $1,345,269
 $2,024,683
 $2,125,503
 $2,138,518
Senior notes$175,000
 $
 $125,000
 $175,000
 $175,000
Total common shareholders' equity$731,283
 $677,444
 $693,332
 $759,250
 $783,659
Total shareholders' equity$806,528
 $730,416
 $741,235
 $816,266
 $832,820
Total employees (4)1,249
(5) 
1,197
 1,203
 1,227
 1,082
(1)We adopted new revenue recognition guidance effective as of January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method. The new guidance was applied prospectively in our consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2018 and reported financial information for periods prior to the year ended December 31, 2018 has not been revised. For a description of our revenue recognition accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.
(2)No allocation of undistributed income was made due to loss position. See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements in this Form
10-K.
(2)(3)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred.
(3)(4)Number of employees reflect continuing operations.
(5)
The total number of employees was 1,541 on January 3, 2020, which reflects the employees who joined our firm as a result of the Sandler O'Neill acquisition.




ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.


The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Certain statements in this Form 10-K may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and may relate to our future plans and objectives and results, and also may include our belief regarding the effect of various legal proceedings, as set forth under "Legal Proceedings"See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in Part I, Item 3 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding such statements and in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Forward-looking statements involve inherentrelated risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including those factors discussed below under "External Factors Impacting Our Business" as well as the factors identified under "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, as updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. These reports are available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.uncertainties.


Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures


We have included financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include adjustments to exclude (1) revenues and expenses related to noncontrolling interests, (2) amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, (3) compensation and non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements, (4) acquisition-related restructuring and acquisition integration costs, (5) the impact from remeasuring deferred tax assets resulting from changes to the U.S. federal tax code, (6) the impact of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance and (5) goodwill impairment charges.(7) discontinued operations. These adjustments affect the following financial measures: net revenues, compensation expenses, non-compensation expenses, income tax expense, net income/(loss) applicable to Piper JaffraySandler Companies, earnings/(loss) per diluted common share, operating expenses, pre-tax operating income, pre-tax operating margin and return on average common shareholders' equity, segment net revenues, segment operating expenses, segment pre-tax operating income/(loss) and segment pre-tax operating margin.equity. Management believes that presenting these results and measures on an adjusted basis in conjunction with the corresponding U.S. GAAP measures provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of itsour operating results across periods, and enhances the overall understanding of our current financial performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. The non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.


Executive Overview


Strategic Growth InitiativesBeginning in 2011, following the financial crisis, we implemented a strategic framework focused on achieving strong results across various markets conditions, as well as growth in earnings and improvement in our return on equity. In order to do so, we focused on increasing the contributions from our higher margin activities (i.e., advisory services, public finance and asset management), diversifying the business, and making investments to drive growth. Through strong execution on these strategic initiatives we have increased net revenues and changed the business mix to higher quality earnings. Our investments in the business are discussed below.

Overview of Operations Our continuing operations are principally engaged inconsist of providing investment banking and institutional brokerage asset management and related financial services to corporations, private equity groups, public entities, non-profit entities and institutional investors in the United States and Europe. We operate through twoone reportable business segments:segment.


Capital Markets – The Capital Markets segment provides investment banking services and institutional sales, trading and research services. Investment banking services include financial advisory services, management of and participation in underwritings financial advisory services and public finance activities. Revenues are generated through the receipt of advisory and financing fees. Institutional sales, trading and research services focus on the trading of equity and fixed income products with institutions, government and non-profit entities. Revenues are generated through commissions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income institutional sales activities, net interest revenues on trading securities held in inventory, and profits and losses from trading these securities.securities, and research checks as clients pay us for research services and corporate access offerings. Also, we generate revenue through strategic trading and investing activities, which focus on investments in municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government agency securities.bonds. In order to invest firm capital and to manage capital from outside investors, we have created alternative asset management funds in merchant banking that involve equity or debt investments in late stage private companies; senior living, which providesprovide financing to U.S. senior living facilities; and in the energy sector, whose principal activity is to invest in oil and gas services companies headquartered in Europe. We receive management and performance fees for managing these funds.

Discontinued Operations Prior to September 30, 2019, we owned ARI, a traditional asset management business. This business was sold in two separate transactions in the third quarter of 2019. ARI's results, previously reported in our Asset Management segment, have been presented herein as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our discontinued operations.

Our Business StrategyWe continue to execute on our business strategy to drive shareholder value through revenue growth and increased profitability. We are focused on providing market leadership in the areas in which we compete and increasing revenues through market share gains, continued sector and geographic expansion, and new product offerings. Part of our continued growth will also include selectively adding partners who share our client-centric culture and who can leverage our platform to better serve clients. We also see continued growth in our advisory services business over the medium-term by capitalizing on the strength of our U.S. franchise to expand further in Europe. Revenue growth combined with operating discipline will drive increased margins and profitability.

Over the past few years, solid execution on our strategy has produced increased revenues and earnings.



Strategic Activities We have made significant progress on our strategic growth initiatives through investmentstook important steps in the business, primarily by expanding into new industry sectors within equity investment banking and equity institutional brokerage, and the expansionexecution of our fixed income middle market sales platform. The following is a summary ofbusiness strategy in 2019. These strategic activities, which impacted our most recent activity.results in 2019 and will significantly impact our go-forward operations, were as follows:


As part of our strategy to expand our equity investment banking business into the energy sector and grow our advisory
business, on February 26, 2016,On January 3, 2020, we completed the acquisition of Simmons & Company International ("Simmons"), an employee-ownedSandler O'Neill, a full-service investment bankbanking firm and broker dealer focused on the energyfinancial services industry.

In the second quarter This transaction accelerates our goal of 2015, we began expandingincreasing our advisory services revenues, diversifies and enhances scale in corporate underwritings, adds a differentiated fixed income business, and increases scale in our equity investment banking business into the financial institutions sector through significant hiring in our Capital Markets segment.

brokerage business.
On September 30, 2015, we built upon our expansion into the financial institutions sector by acquiring the assets of River Branch Holdings LLC ("River Branch"), an equity investment banking boutique focused on the financial institutions sector. The acquisition added investment banking resources dedicated to banks, thrifts, and depository institutions, and further strengthened our mergers and acquisitions leadership in the middle markets.

On October 9, 2015,August 2, 2019, we completed the acquisition of BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc.Weeden & Co. L.P. ("BMO GKST"Weeden & Co."),. Weeden & Co. is a municipal bond sales,broker dealer focused on providing institutional clients with global trading solutions, specializing in best execution through the use of high-touch, low-touch and origination businessprogram trading capabilities. The transaction added enhanced trade execution capabilities and scale to our equity brokerage business.
In the third quarter of BMO Financial Corp. This acquisition expanded our fixed income institutional sales, trading and underwriting platforms. Additionally, it strengthened our strategic analytic and advisory capabilities.

For more information on our acquisitions, see Note 42019, we completed the sale of our consolidated financial statements.

Asset Management – The Asset Management segment, which providesARI. Exiting the traditional asset management business generated capital to deploy in our capital markets business.
On February 21, 2020, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire The Valence Group, an investment bank offering mergers and acquisitions advisory services manages assets in domesticto companies and international equity markets. Additionally, the asset management segment manages investments in master limited partnerships ("MLPs") and energy infrastructure securities focusedfinancial sponsors with a focus on the energychemicals, materials and related sectors. The transaction adds a new industry sector for institutions and individuals. Revenues are generatedexpands our presence in Europe. The transaction is expected to close in the form of management and performance fees. Revenues are also generated through investments in the partnerships and funds that we manage.

An explicit element of our strategy in asset management is to diversify our product offerings by adding high quality investment teams. Consistent with this strategy, we added Cupps Capital Management, LLC ("Cupps") in the fourthsecond quarter of 2016. Cupps focuses on U.S. growth investment strategies with an aggressive growth equity product.2020, subject to obtaining required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.

With respect to our Asset Management segment, an extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management, combined with certain products having investment performance below their benchmarks, have reduced management fees for this business and caused a corresponding decline in profitability. Lower average assets under management for our MLP strategies, driven by a decline in MLP valuations, also resulted in decreased management fees and profitability. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we conducted our annual goodwill impairment testing, including the goodwill associated with our Asset Management segment, which resulted in a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $82.9 million. For more information on our goodwill impairment testing, please refer to the "Critical Accounting Policies" section.



Financial Highlights
 Twelve Months Ended  Percent Inc/(Dec)Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Dec. 31, Dec. 31, 2016    2019
2016 2015 vs. 20152019 2018 v2018
U.S. GAAP           
Net revenues $747,349
 $672,918
 11.1%$834,566
 $740,953
 12.6%
Compensation and benefits expenses 510,612
 421,733
 21.1
Compensation and benefits516,090
 488,487
 5.7
Non-compensation expenses 267,611
 164,762
 62.4
199,497
 179,977
 10.8
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies (21,952) 52,075
 N/M
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share $(1.73) $3.34
 N/M
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies111,711
 57,036
 95.9
Earnings per diluted common share$7.69
 $3.72
 106.7
           
Non-GAAP(1)
           
Adjusted net revenues $736,279
 $663,108
 11.0%$823,797
 $737,332
 11.7%
Adjusted compensation and benefits expenses 474,371
 417,500
 13.6
Adjusted compensation and benefits510,952
 459,241
 11.3
Adjusted non-compensation expenses 150,427
 143,045
 5.2
176,458
 169,609
 4.0
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies 72,642
 65,850
 10.3
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies106,197
 87,412
 21.5
Adjusted earnings per diluted common share $4.69
 $4.22
 11.1
$7.36
 $5.72
 28.7
N/M — Not meaningful


For the year ended December 31, 20162019


Net revenues increased 11.112.6 percent compared to 2015,2018 as higher advisory services, and debt financing and institutional brokerage revenues, and higher investment income, were partially offset by lower equity financing and asset management revenues.
Compensation and benefits expenses were up 21.15.7 percent compared to the year-ago period due primarily toas higher compensation expenses arisingresulting from increased revenues as well as additionalwere partially offset by lower acquisition-related compensation expenses associated with our recent acquisitions, including amortization of deal consideration tied to employment, and expansion into the financial institutions sector.costs.
Non-compensation expenses increased 62.410.8 percent compared to 2015, driven by an $82.9 million goodwill impairment charge. Also, higher acquisition-related expenses and higher costs as a result2018 due to the addition of business expansion were partially offset by a $9.8 million settlement of a legal matterWeeden & Co. to our platform in the prior-year period.third quarter of 2019 and $14.3 million of acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded a tax benefit of $5.1 million and $7.1 million, respectively, related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price. The tax benefit increased earnings per diluted common share by $0.36 and $0.46 in 2019 and 2018, respectively.
In 2016,2019, our return on average common shareholders' equity was a negative 2.813.0 percent, compared with 6.48.1 percent for 2015.2018. On an adjusted basis, we generated a return on average common shareholders' equity of 9.215.7 percent(2) in 2016,2019, compared with 8.112.7 percent(2) for 2015.2018.







(1) Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted non-GAAP financial information
(1)Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted non-GAAP financial information
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2016 20152019 2018
Net revenues:      
Net revenues – U.S. GAAP basis$747,349
 $672,918
$834,566
 $740,953
Adjustments:      
Revenue related to noncontrolling interests(11,070) (9,810)(10,769) (3,621)
Adjusted net revenues$736,279
 $663,108
$823,797
 $737,332
      
Compensation and benefits:      
Compensation and benefits – U.S. GAAP basis$510,612
 $421,733
$516,090
 $488,487
Adjustments:      
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements(36,241) (4,233)(5,138) (29,246)
Adjusted compensation and benefits$474,371
 $417,500
$510,952
 $459,241
      
Non-compensation expenses:      
Non-compensation expenses – U.S. GAAP basis$267,611
 $164,762
$199,497
 $179,977
Adjustments:      
Non-compensation expenses related to noncontrolling interests(2,864) (3,403)(4,306) (4,827)
Restructuring and integration costs(10,206) (10,652)
Goodwill impairment(82,900) 
Acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs(14,321) 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions(21,214) (7,662)(4,298) (4,858)
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements(114) (683)
Adjusted non-compensation expenses$150,427
 $143,045
$176,458
 $169,609
      
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies:   
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies – U.S. GAAP basis$(21,952) $52,075
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies:   
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies – U.S. GAAP basis$111,711
 $57,036
Adjustment to exclude net income from discontinued operations23,772
 1,387
Net income from continuing operations$87,939
 $55,649
Adjustments:      
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements23,700
 2,586
4,124
 21,992
Restructuring and integration costs7,014
 6,508
Goodwill impairment50,901
 
Acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs10,770
 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions12,979
 4,681
3,250
 3,655
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$72,642
 $65,850
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements114
 514
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act legislation
 952
Impact of deferred tax asset valuation allowance
 4,650
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$106,197
 $87,412
      
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share:   
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share – U.S. GAAP basis$(1.73) $3.34
Adjustment for loss allocated to participating shares (3)0.30
 
Earnings per diluted common share:   
Earnings per diluted common share – U.S. GAAP basis$7.69
 $3.72
Adjustment to exclude net income from discontinued operations1.65
 0.09
Income from continuing operations$6.05
 $3.63
Adjustment related to participating shares (3)0.04
 
(1.43) 3.34
$6.09
 $3.63
Adjustments:      
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements1.53
 0.17
0.29
 1.44
Restructuring and integration costs0.45
 0.42
Goodwill impairment3.29
 
Acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs0.75
 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions0.84
 0.30
0.23
 0.24
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements0.01
 0.04
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act legislation
 0.06
Impact of deferred tax asset valuation allowance
 0.31
Adjusted earnings per diluted common share$4.69
 $4.22
$7.36
 $5.72


(2)Adjusted return on average common shareholders' equity, a non-GAAP measure, is computed by dividing adjusted net income applicable to Piper JaffraySandler Companies for the last 12 months by average monthly common shareholders' equity. For a detailed explanation of the components of adjusted net income, see "Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted non-GAAP financial information" in footnote (1).


(3)Piper Jaffray Companies calculates earnings per common share usingA non-GAAP measure for which the two-class method, which requires the allocation of consolidated adjusted net income between common shareholders and participating security holders, which in the case of Piper Jaffray Companies, represents unvested stock with dividend rights. Losses are not allocatedadjustment related to participating shares for periodsexcludes the impact of the annual special cash dividend paid in which a loss is incurred.the first quarter.




Market Data


The following table provides a summary of relevant market data over the past three years.
       2016 2015       2019 2018
Year Ended 2016 2015 2014 v2015 v2014 2019 2018 2017 v2018 v2017
Dow Jones Industrials Average (a)
 19,763
 17,425
 17,823
 13.4 % (2.2)%
NASDAQ (a)
 5,383
 5,007
 4,736
 7.5 % 5.7 %
S&P 500 (a)
 3,231
 2,507
 2,677
 28.9 % (6.4)%
Nasdaq (a)
 8,973
 6,635
 6,950
 35.2 % (4.5)%
Mergers and Acquisitions - Middle Market          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (b)
 2,920
 2,933
 2,727
 (0.4)% 7.6 %
Public Equity Offerings          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (c) (f)
 888
 979
 961
 (9.3)% 1.9 %
Initial Public Offerings          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (b)(c)
 207
 226
 182
 (8.4)% 24.2 %
Equity Capital Markets Fee Pool - Sub $5 billion          
(value of transactions in millions in U.S.) (d)
 $4,729
 $5,244
 $5,300
 (9.8)% (1.1)%
Municipal Negotiated Issuances          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (c)(e)
 7,450
 5,872
 8,041
 26.9 % (27.0)%
Municipal Negotiated Issuances          
(value of transactions in billions in U.S.) (e)
 $326.4
 $264.1
 $350.4
 23.6 % (24.6)%
Average CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) 15
 17
 11
 (11.8)% 54.5 %
NYSE Average Daily Number of Shares Traded                    
(millions of shares) 1,256
 1,187
 1,039
 5.8 % 14.2 % 1,690
 1,708
 1,510
 (1.1)% 13.1 %
NASDAQ Average Daily Number of Shares Traded          
Nasdaq Average Daily Number of Shares Traded          
(millions of shares) 1,896
 1,886
 1,952
 0.5 % (3.4)% 1,381
 1,428
 1,179
 (3.3)% 21.1 %
Mergers and Acquisitions          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (b)(c)
 10,540
 10,319
 10,263
 2.1 % 0.5 %
Public Equity Offerings          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (c) (e)
 735
 909
 1,107
 (19.1)% (17.9)%
Initial Public Offerings          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (c)(e)
 106
 171
 282
 (38.0)% (39.4)%
Municipal Negotiated Issuances          
(number of transactions in U.S.) (d)
 8,881
 8,764
 7,261
 1.3 % 20.7 %
Municipal Negotiated Issuances          
(value of transactions in billions in U.S.) (d)
 $352.6
 $315.9
 $266.1
 11.6 % 18.7 %
10-Year Treasuries Average Rate 1.84% 2.14% 2.21% (14.0)% (3.2)%
3-Month Treasuries Average Rate 0.32% 0.05% 0.03% 540.0 % 66.7 %
10-Year Treasury Average Rate 2.14% 2.91% 2.33% (26.5)% 24.9 %
3-Month Treasury Average Rate 2.11% 1.97% 0.95% 7.1 % 107.4 %
Average 10-Year Municipal-Treasury Ratio (g)
 0.79
 0.85
 0.89
 (7.1)% (4.5)%
(a)Data provided is at period end.
(b)Source: Securities Data Corporation.Thomson Reuters (transactions with reported deal value between $100 million and $1 billion and transactions with an undisclosed deal value that had a financial advisor).
(c)Source: Dealogic (offerings with reported market value greater than $20 million).
(d)Source: Dealogic, PlacementTracker, public filings with the SEC and Piper Sandler Equity Capital Markets (includes IPO, follow-on offerings and convertible offerings with deal values greater than $10 million and PIPEs/RDs greater than $5 million for issuers with post-deal market caps greater than $2 billion).
(e)Source: Thomson Reuters.
(e)(f)Number of transactions includes convertible offerings.
(g)Calculated based on the 10-year Municipal Market Data (MMD) index rate divided by the 10-year treasury rate.


External Factors Impacting Our Business


Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many factors, which are beyond our control, often unpredictable and at times inherently volatile. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the demand for investment banking services as reflected by the number and size of advisory transactions and equity and debt financings, and merger and acquisition transactions, the relative level of volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, changes in interest rates and credit spreads (especially rapid and extreme changes), overall market liquidity, the level and shape of various yield curves, the volume and value of trading in securities, and overall equity valuations, and the demand for active asset management services.valuations.


Factors that differentiate our business within the financial services industry also may affect our financial results. For example, our capital markets business focuses on specific industry sectors while serving principally middle-market clientele. If the business environment for our focus sectors is impacted adversely, our business and results of operations could reflect these impacts. In addition, our business, with its specific areas of focus and investment, may not track overall market trends. Given the variability of the capital markets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluctuate significantly from period to period, and results for any individual period should not be considered indicative of future results.



Outlook for 20172020


Markets strengthened followingWe believe that the U.S. electioneconomy will continue to grow at a moderate pace in November 2016. Factors contributing to2020, although this market dynamic includedpace may be impacted by geopolitical and macroeconomic risks, such as uncertainties surrounding trade policy, negotiations regarding Brexit, a disease pandemic and global economic conditions. These risks and uncertainties may pose consequences for the belief that administrativeglobal economy and legislative policies, including increased fiscal spending, deregulation and tax reform, may provide catalysts to propel the economy in 2017. However, uncertainty over the details of these policies and their transition, as well as political or economic instability internationally, may inject periods of heightened volatility into the U.S. equity and debt markets. If economicThe 2020 U.S. presidential election may also influence the volatility or direction of markets based on investors’ assessment of the outcome and the overall political outlook in the U.S.

U.S. monetary policy will continue to be a critical factor impacting the economy and financial markets. Uncertainties around global growth, accelerates we would expect that higher interest rates would ensue. We anticipate thatinflation expectations, and U.S. employment data continue to influence the U.S. Federal Reserve would manage to a gradual and steady path to rate normalization. Exogenous conditions, however, may trigger episodes of volatility with respect to interest rates. A rising or volatileReserve's interest rate environment may have a mixed impact on certain ofpolicies. Factors such as these resulted in three reductions in short-term interest rates during 2019.

Despite the geopolitical and macroeconomic risks, market conditions remain conducive to advisory engagements, especially in the U.S. middle market, our businesses.

We expect the equity markets to be constructive in 2017 as U.S.primary market. Advisory activity has been driven by continued solid economic growth spurred by the lowering of taxdomestically, healthy valuations, ample financing availability with low interest rates, and easingdemand from private equity investors. The addition of the regulatory burden on companies, results in improving valuations and sustained CEO confidence levels. These conditions favor our equity capital raising and advisory services businesses. After challenging market conditions in the first half of 2016, we are optimistic that equity financing activitySandler O'Neill will improve compared to 2016, absent any episodes of heightened volatility or significant declines in equity market valuations. While lower volatility benefits our capital raising business, it adversely impacts our equity sales and trading business. If we experience sustained bouts of higher volatility or material market correction, however, our equity brokerage business may benefit while our equity capital raising and advisory businesses would suffer. Mergers and acquisition activity levels were strong inelevate our advisory services businesspractice in 2016, and wethe middle market through its market leadership in financial services. We believe thisour advisory services business will continue to perform well in 2017 on2020 as our pipeline remains strong across our industry sectors and will likely be more weighted to the strengthsecond half of our market position, recent investments, and sustained CEO confidence levels.the year. Advisory services revenues for any given quarter are impacted by the timing and size of the deals' closings,deals closing, which can result in fluctuations in revenues period over period.


Equity capital raising had a strong finish to 2019 driven by favorable market conditions for capital raising transactions. The addition of Sandler O'Neill in 2020 will diversify and add scale to our corporate financing activities. We believe that our combined corporate financing pipeline is strong in a market conducive to capital raising. However, if the equity market experiences sustained bouts of higher volatility or a material market correction, our advisory services and corporate capital raising revenues may suffer.

In our equity brokerage business, low volatility and volumes continued through the end of 2019, as the market presented few catalysts for clients to trade as the equity markets continued to advance, despite growth concerns and trade tensions. While higherlower volatility benefits our capital raising revenues, it adversely impacts our equity sales and trading business. Our acquisition of Weeden & Co. enhanced the scale of our equity brokerage business by upgrading our trading capabilities and broadening our client base, driving an increase in revenues in 2019. Our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill will further enhance our equity brokerage business in 2020 through expanded research and account coverage.

Interest rates remain relatively low by historical standards and the yield curve steepened in the fourth quarter of 2019. Market conditions, including interest rates would be favorableand credit spreads, as well as the level of client activity will continue to impact our fixed income institutionalresults in 2020. Sandler O'Neill will broaden our fixed income product offerings and client mix to increase our fixed income brokerage business, the move to higher rates could adversely impactrevenues in 2020. In our public finance business, municipal issuance levels increased in the short-term as the level of refunding activity abates prior2019 compared to greater economic growth increasing new money issuance volumes. We believe that the level of municipal debt underwriting activity will decline in 2017 after record2018 driven by lower interest rates and increased client demand. In 2020, we expect market issuance volumes to be up from 2019 levels, notwithstanding material increases in 2016. Our geographic range, product capabilities, and industry expertise should serve to mitigate somewhat the impact of less favorable market conditions on the performance of our public finance business.interest rates.

Increased economic growth and higher valuations will benefit our asset management business. We will continue to monitor, however, the trend of investors shifting from active to passive investment vehicles. Changing market conditions and increased differentiation in performance by individual companies could begin to favor active managers over passive vehicles in terms of capturing market returns. This could lead to the slowing or reversal of funds flowing out of actively managed strategies which would be beneficial for our business. While it is difficult to anticipate which areas of the market will attract investor interest, we continue to expand our product offerings to broaden our exposure to areas of investor interest.



Results of Operations


Financial Summary


The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations on a U.S. GAAP basis and the results of our operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
        As a Percentage of        As a Percentage of
        Net Revenues for the        Net Revenues for the
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
      2016 2015            2019 2018      
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 v2015 v2014 2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017 v2018 v2017 2019 2018 2017
Revenues:                              
Investment banking$490,340
 $414,118
 $369,811
 18.4 % 12.0 % 65.6 % 61.5% 57.1%$629,392
 $588,978
 $633,837
 6.9 % (7.1)% 75.4% 79.5 % 77.0 %
Institutional brokerage161,186
 154,889
 156,809
 4.1
 (1.2) 21.6
 23.0
 24.2
167,891
 124,738
 154,712
 34.6
 (19.4) 20.1
 16.8
 18.8
Asset management60,672
 75,017
 85,062
 (19.1) (11.8) 8.1
 11.1
 13.1
Interest33,074
 41,557
 48,716
 (20.4) (14.7) 4.4
 6.2
 7.5
26,741
 32,749
 31,954
 (18.3) 2.5
 3.2
 4.4
 3.9
Investment income24,602
 10,736
 12,813
 129.2
 (16.2) 3.3
 1.6
 2.0
22,275
 11,039
 23,386
 101.8
 (52.8) 2.7
 1.5
 2.8
Total revenues769,874
 696,317
 673,211
 10.6
 3.4
 103.0
 103.5
 103.9
846,299
 757,504
 843,889
 11.7
 (10.2) 101.4
 102.2
 102.5
                              
Interest expense22,525
 23,399
 25,073
 (3.7) (6.7) 3.0
 3.5
 3.9
11,733
 16,551
 20,268
 (29.1) (18.3) 1.4
 2.2
 2.5
                              
Net revenues747,349
 672,918
 648,138
 11.1
 3.8
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
834,566
 740,953
 823,621
 12.6
 (10.0) 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
                              
Non-interest expenses:                              
Compensation and benefits510,612
 421,733
 394,510
 21.1
 6.9
 68.3
 62.7
 60.9
516,090
 488,487
 589,637
 5.7
 (17.2) 61.8
 65.9
 71.6
Outside services39,289
 36,218
 37,055
 8.5
 (2.3) 5.3
 5.4
 5.7
36,184
 36,528
 33,981
 (0.9) 7.5
 4.3
 4.9
 4.1
Occupancy and equipment34,813
 28,301
 28,231
 23.0
 0.2
 4.7
 4.2
 4.4
36,795
 34,194
 31,943
 7.6
 7.0
 4.4
 4.6
 3.9
Communications29,626
 23,762
 22,732
 24.7
 4.5
 4.0
 3.5
 3.5
30,760
 28,656
 26,430
 7.3
 8.4
 3.7
 3.9
 3.2
Marketing and business development30,404
 29,990
 27,260
 1.4
 10.0
 4.1
 4.5
 4.2
28,780
 26,936
 28,673
 6.8
 (6.1) 3.4
 3.6
 3.5
Deal-related expenses25,823
 25,120
 
 2.8
 N/M
 3.1
 3.4
 
Trade execution and clearance7,651
 7,794
 7,621
 (1.8) 2.3
 1.0
 1.2
 1.2
10,186
 8,014
 8,166
 27.1
 (1.9) 1.2
 1.1
 1.0
Restructuring and integration costs10,206
 10,652
 
 (4.2) N/M
 1.4
 1.6
 
14,321
 3,498
 
 309.4
 N/M
 1.7
 0.5
 
Goodwill impairment82,900
 
 
 N/M
 N/M
��11.1
 
 
Intangible asset amortization expense21,214
 7,662
 9,272
 176.9
 (17.4) 2.8
 1.1
 1.4
Intangible asset amortization4,298
 4,858
 10,178
 (11.5) (52.3) 0.5
 0.7
 1.2
Back office conversion costs561
 
 
 N/M
 N/M
 0.1
 
 

 
 3,927
 N/M
 N/M
 
 
 0.5
Other operating expenses10,947
 20,383
 11,146
 (46.3) 82.9
 1.5
 3.0
 1.7
12,350
 12,173
 11,370
 1.5
 7.1
 1.5
 1.6
 1.4
Total non-interest expenses778,223
 586,495
 537,827
 32.7
 9.0
 104.1
 87.2
 83.0
715,587
 668,464
 744,305
 7.0
 (10.2) 85.7
 90.2
 90.4
                              
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)(30,874) 86,423
 110,311
 N/M
 (21.7) (4.1) 12.8
 17.0
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense118,979
 72,489
 79,316
 64.1
 (8.6) 14.3
 9.8
 9.6
                              
Income tax expense/(benefit)(17,128) 27,941
 35,986
 N/M
 (22.4) (2.3) 4.2
 5.6
Income tax expense24,577
 18,046
 53,808
 36.2
 (66.5) 2.9
 2.4
 6.5
                              
Income from continuing operations94,402
 54,443
 25,508
 73.4
 113.4
 11.3
 7.3
 3.1
               
Discontinued operations:               
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax23,772
 1,387
 (85,060) N/M
 N/M
 2.8
 0.2
 (10.3)
Net income/(loss)(13,746) 58,482
 74,325
 N/M
 (21.3) (1.8) 8.7
 11.5
118,174
 55,830
 (59,552) 111.7
 N/M
 14.2
 7.5
 (7.2)
                              
Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests8,206
 6,407
 11,153
 28.1
 (42.6) 1.1
 1.0
 1.7
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests6,463
 (1,206) 2,387
 N/M
 (150.5) 0.8
 (0.2) 0.3
                              
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
 N/M
 (17.6)% (2.9)% 7.7% 9.7%
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939) 95.9 % N/M
 13.4% 7.7 % (7.5)%
N/M — Not meaningful



For the year ended December 31, 20162019, we recorded a net loss applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies of $22.0 million, driven by a $50.9 million, net of tax, goodwill impairment charge. Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $747.3 million, a 11.1 percent increase compared to $672.9 million in the year-ago period. In2016, investment banking revenues increased 18.4 percent to $490.3 million, compared with $414.1 million in 2015, driven by strong advisory services and debt financing revenues which reflect our investments and focus to grow these businesses. These increases were partially offset by lower equity financing revenues, as our equity capital raising business experienced challenging market conditions for most of 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, institutional brokerage revenues were $161.2 million, up 4.1 percent compared with $154.9 millionin2015, due to higher equity institutional brokerage revenues. Asset management fees were $60.7 million in 2016, compared with $75.0 millionin2015, due to lower management fees from our equity and MLP product offerings. For the year ended December 31, 2016, net interest income decreased to $10.5 million, compared with $18.2 million in 2015. The decrease primarily resulted from the liquidation of our municipal bond fund with outside investors in the second half of 2015, and additional interest expense on our senior notes. In addition, we had lower interest income earned on mortgage-backed securities as a result of lower inventory balances. In 2016, investment income was $24.6 million, compared with $10.7 million in 2015. In the prior year, we recorded losses on our investments of firm capital in our MLP strategies. Non-interest expenses were $778.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of 32.7 percent compared to $586.5 million in the prior year. The increase was due to an $82.9 million goodwill impairment charge, as well as higher compensation expense driven by increased revenues and higher expenses resulting from our recent acquisitions and business expansion. Partially offsetting this increase was lower legal reserves associated with a $9.8 million legal settlement in 2015.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded net income applicable to Piper JaffraySandler Companies, including continuing and discontinued operations, of $52.1$111.7 million. Net revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20152019 were $672.9$834.6 million, a 3.812.6 percent increase compared to $648.1$741.0 million in 2014. the year-ago period. In 2015,2019, investment banking revenues increased 12.06.9 percent to $414.1$629.4 million, compared with $369.8$589.0 million in 2014, driven by strong2018, as higher advisory services and debt financing revenues as we were able to continue to capitalize on the investments we have made to strengthen these businesses.offset by lower equity financing revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, institutional brokerage revenues were $154.9$167.9 million, up 34.6 percent compared with $156.8$124.7 million in 2014. Asset management fees were $75.0 million in 2015, compared with $85.1 million in 2014,2018, due to lower management fees from ourhigher equity product offerings resulting from decreased assets under management. For the year ended December 31, 2015, netand fixed income institutional brokerage revenues. Net interest income decreased to $18.2$15.0 million in 2019, compared with $16.2 million in 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, investment income was $22.3 million, compared with $23.6$11.0 million in 2014.2018. The decrease primarily resulted from lower average inventory balances in municipal and treasury securitiesincrease was driven by the closure and liquidation of our municipal bond fund with outside investors in the second half of 2015, as well as lower interest income attributable to a merchant banking debt investment that was repaid in the second quarter of 2014. These decreases were partially offset by increased interest expense at the end of 2015 due to a higher amount of outstanding principalgains on our senior notes. In 2015, investment income was $10.7 million, compared with $12.8 million in 2014, as we recorded gains associated with our investment and the noncontrolling interests in the merchant banking fundfunds that we manage, whichmanage. Non-interest expenses from continuing operations were $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of 7.0 percent compared to $668.5 million in the prior year, as higher compensation expenses from increased revenues were partially offset by losseslower acquisition-related compensation. Additionally, non-interest expenses increased due to incremental expenses resulting from the addition of Weeden & Co. to our platform and $14.3 million of acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies, including continuing and discontinued operations, of $57.0 million. Net revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $741.0 million, a 10.0 percent decrease compared to $823.6 million in 2017. In 2018, investment banking revenues decreased 7.1 percent to $589.0 million, compared with $633.8 million in 2017, as higher equity financing revenues were more than offset by lower advisory services and debt financing revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2018, institutional brokerage revenues were $124.7 million, down 19.4 percent compared with $154.7 million in 2017, due to lower equity and fixed income institutional brokerage revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2018, net interest income increased to $16.2 million, compared with $11.7 million in 2017. The increase was driven by lower long-term financing expenses. We repaid $50 million of variable rate senior notes upon maturity on May 31, 2017. In addition, we repaid $125 million of fixed rate senior notes upon maturity on October 9, 2018. In 2018, investment income was $11.0 million, compared with $23.4 million in 2017. The decrease was due to lower gains on our investments ofinvestment and the noncontrolling interests in the merchant banking funds that we manage, as well as lower gains on our other firm capital in our MLP strategies.investments. Non-interest expenses from continuing operations were $586.5$668.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase2018, a decrease of 9.010.2 percent compared to $537.8$744.3 million in 2014, resulting from higher2017. In 2018, lower compensation expenses due to increasedfrom decreased revenues and expansionlower acquisition-related costs were partially offset by the impact of our financial institutions group, as well as higher non-compensationpresenting deal-related expenses due toon a $9.8 million legal settlement charge and restructuring and integration costs primarily associated withgross basis on the acquisitionsconsolidated statements of River Branch and BMO GKST.operations. Beginning in 2018, new accounting guidance required the gross presentation of client reimbursed deal expenses.



Consolidated Non-Interest Expenses from Continuing Operations


Compensation and Benefits Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of our expenses, include salaries, incentive compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation, employment taxes, income associated with the forfeiture of stock-based compensation and other employeeemployee-related costs. A portion of compensation expense is comprised of variable incentive arrangements, including discretionary incentive compensation, the amount of which fluctuates in proportion to the level of business activity, increasing with higher revenues and operating profits. Other compensation costs, primarily base salaries and benefits, are more fixed in nature. The timing of incentive compensation payments, which generally occur in February, has a greater impact on our cash position and liquidity than is reflected on our consolidated statements of operations.We have granted restricted stock and restricted cash with service conditions as a component of our acquisition deal consideration, which is amortized to compensation expense over the service period.


For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, compensation and benefits expenses increased 21.15.7 percent to $510.6$516.1 million from $421.7$488.5 million in 2015,2018. Compensation expenses increased due to higher revenues as well as higherrevenues. Partially offsetting this increase was lower acquisition-related compensation costs primarily resulting from the Simmons acquisition completed in February 2016.costs. Compensation and benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues was 68.361.8 percentin2016, 2019, compared with 62.765.9 percentin 2015. 2018. The higher compensation expense ratio was attributablefavorably impacted by decreased acquisition-related compensation related to increasedthe acquisition of Simmons & Company International ("Simmons") as the requisite service period for our Simmons acquisition-related compensation. We expectcompensation arrangements ended in the second quarter of 2019. Partially offsetting this ratiodecline was acquisition-related compensation related to continue at an elevated ratethe Weeden & Co. acquisition, which closed on August 2, 2019. Beginning in 2017.2020, we will incur additional acquisition-related compensation related to the acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, which closed on January 3, 2020, and a full year of acquisition-related compensation related to Weeden & Co.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, compensation and benefits expenses increased 6.9decreased 17.2 percent to $421.7$488.5 million from $394.5$589.6 million in 2014,2017. Compensation expenses decreased due primarily to improved financial results.lower revenues as well as lower acquisition-related compensation costs, which were driven by a decline in compensation expenses related to the Simmons performance award plan implemented at the time of acquisition. Our compensation costs related to this performance plan decreased to $8.9 million in 2018, compared to $27.0 million in 2017. Compensation costs were higher in 2017 due to outperformance of the Simmons business in 2017. Compensation and benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues was 62.765.9 percent in 2015, 2018, compared with 60.971.6 percent in 2014.2017. The higherlower compensation expense ratio was attributable to incrementalreflects decreased acquisition-related compensation and the impact of presenting investment banking revenues gross of related client reimbursed deal expenses, as required by accounting guidance effective January 1, 2018. This change resulted in a 230 basis point decrease to the expansion of our financial institutions group as well as a changecompensation ratio in our mix of revenues.2018.
 
Outside Services – Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced technology functions, outside legal fees, fund expenses associated with our consolidated alternative asset management funds and other professional fees. Outside services expenses increased 8.5 percent to $39.3 million in 2016, compared withwere $36.2 million in the corresponding period of 2015.2019, down slightly compared with 2018.

Outside services expenses increased 7.5 percent to $36.5 million in 2018, compared with $34.0 million in 2017. Excluding the portion of expenses from non-controlled equity interests in our consolidated alternative asset management funds, outside services expenses increased 9.26.0 percent due primarily to higheran increase in professional fees, partially offset by a reduction in securities processing costs as well as incremental expenses relateda result of migrating to our acquisitions.a fully disclosed clearing model in the third quarter of 2017.


Outside services expenses decreased 2.3 percent to $36.2 million in 2015, compared with $37.1 million in 2014. Excluding the portion of expenses from non-controlled equity interests in our consolidated alternative asset management funds, outside services expenses decreased 1.7 percent.

Occupancy and Equipment – For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, occupancy and equipment expenses increased 23.07.6 percent to $34.8$36.8 million, compared with $28.3$34.2 million in 2015.2018. The increase was primarily due to an increase in software maintenance expense and incremental expense related to the resultacquisition of incremental occupancy expenses from our acquisitions of Simmons, River Branch and BMO GKST.Weeden & Co.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, occupancy and equipment expenses were $28.3increased 7.0 percent to $34.2 million, essentially flat compared with 2014.$31.9 million in 2017. The increase was primarily due to incremental occupancy costs related to transitioning to new office space in Houston, Texas, along with a few smaller office locations.


Communications – Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily consisting of expenses for obtaining third party market data information. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, communication expenses increased 24.77.3 percent to $29.6$30.8 million, compared with $23.8$28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The increase resulted fromin expense was due to higher market data service expenses dueand incremental expense related to the additional headcount associated with our acquisition of Simmons, and also reflects a full year of incremental expenses associated with our acquisitions of River Branch and BMO GKST.Weeden & Co.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, communication expenses increased 4.58.4 percent to $23.8$28.7 million, compared with $22.7$26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017. The increase resulted fromwas primarily due to higher market data service expenses due to the additional headcount associated with our financial institutions group expansion and our acquisitions of River Branch and BMO GKST.services.


Marketing and Business Development – Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment costs, advertising and third party marketing fees. In 2016,2019, marketing and business development expenses were $30.4increased 6.8 percent to $28.8 million, compared with $30.0$26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as2018. The increase was driven by higher travel and entertainment costs related to increased travel expenses were offset by a decline in third party marketing fees.investment banking activity.


In 2015,2018, marketing and business development expenses increased 10.0decreased 6.1 percent to $30.0$26.9 million, compared with $27.3$28.7 million infor the year ended December 31, 2014, due2017. The decline was attributable to higherlower marketing and travel expenses.

Deal-Related Expenses – Deal-related expenses from increased business activityinclude costs we incurred over the course of a completed investment banking deal, which primarily consist of legal fees, offering expenses, and acquisition-related travel.


Trade Executiontravel and Clearance –entertainment costs. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, deal-related expenses increased 2.8 percent to $25.8 million, compared with $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The amount of deal-related expenses is principally dependent on the level of deal activity and may vary from period to period as the recognition of deal-related costs typically coincides with the closing of a transaction.

Effective January 1, 2018, new revenue recognition guidance required us to present reimbursed deal expenses as non-interest expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, rather than netting deal expenses incurred for completed investment banking deals within revenues.


Trade Execution and Clearance – For the year ended December 31, 2019, trade execution and clearance expenses were $7.7$10.2 million, down slightly compared with 2015.$8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in trade execution and clearance expenses was reflective of higher trading volumes driven by the addition of Weeden & Co. onto our platform.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, trade execution and clearance expenses were $7.8$8.0 million, essentially flat compared with $7.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.


Restructuring and Integration CostsDuringFor the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we recorded restructuring and acquisition integration costs of $10.2 million primarily related to our acquisition of Simmons. The expenses consisted of $6.6 million of severance, benefits and outplacement costs, $1.3 million of vacated redundant leased office space, $1.3 million of transaction costs, and $1.0 million of contract termination costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recordedincurred acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs of $10.7$14.3 million primarily related to the acquisitions of River BranchWeeden & Co. and BMO GKST.Sandler O'Neill. The expenses consisted of $8.8$6.9 million of professional fees related to the transactions, $2.9 million of severance benefits, and outplacement costs, $1.4 million of transaction costs, and $0.5$2.8 million of contract termination costs.costs and $1.7 million for vacated leased office space. We expect to incur additional restructuring and integration costs related to the acquisition of Sandler O'Neill in the first half of 2020.


Goodwill Impairment – DuringFor the fourth quarteryear ended December 31, 2018, we recorded restructuring costs of 2016, we completed our annual goodwill impairment testing, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $82.9$3.5 million related to the asset management reporting unit.our brokerage business, consisting of $3.2 million of severance benefits, $0.1 million for vacated leased office space and $0.2 million for contract termination costs.


Intangible Asset Amortization Expense Intangible asset amortization expense includes the amortization of definite-lived intangible assets consisting of customer relationships, internally developed software and the Simmons trade name, and non-competition agreements.name. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, intangible asset amortization expense was $21.2$4.3 million, compared with $7.7$4.9 million in the corresponding period of 2015. The increase reflects incremental2018. In 2020, we anticipate incurring additional intangible asset amortization expense related to the acquisition of Simmons,Sandler O'Neill and a full year of intangible asset amortization expense related to the 2015 acquisitionsacquisition of River Branch and BMO GKST.Weeden & Co.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, intangible asset amortization expense was $7.7$4.9 million, compared with $9.3$10.2 million in the corresponding period of 2014.2017.


Back Office Conversion Costs In 2017, we will be migrating from a self clearing modelmigrated to a fully disclosed model.clearing model and are no longer self clearing. Back office conversion costs includesincluded costs incurred to movetransition to a fully disclosed clearing model, such as contract termination fees,costs, vendor migration fees, other professional fees, and severance benefits for impacted personnel. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, we incurred back office conversion costs of $0.6$3.9 million. We expect to complete this conversion in 2017 and incur costs of approximately $3.0 million between 2016 and 2017. We anticipate a meaningful reduction in our trade clearing expenses by moving to a fully disclosed model.


Other Operating Expenses – Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses related to our charitable giving program and litigation-related expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory matters. Other operating expenses decreased to $10.9were $12.4 million in 2016,2019, essentially flat compared with $20.4 million in 2015. Legal reserves were higher in 2015 due to a $9.8 million charge resulting from settlement of a legal matter.2018.


Other operating expenses increased slightly to $20.4$12.2 million in 2015,2018, compared with $11.1$11.4 million in 2014. In 2015, we recorded a $9.8 million charge related to settlement of a legal matter.2017.


Income Taxes For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, our benefit fromprovision for income taxes was $17.1$24.6 million, equatingwhich included a $5.1 million tax benefit related to an effective tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests,stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price. Excluding the impact of 43.8 percent. The higherthis benefit, our effective tax rate was due26.4 percent.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective January 1, 2018. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the benefit from tax-exempt municipal interestTax Cuts and Jobs Act" ("SAB 118") permitted companies to report a provisional amount in the 2017 financial statements if the accounting for income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was incomplete as of December 31, 2017. This provisional amount would be subject to adjustment in subsequent periods during a defined measurement period, with pre-tax losses.which was limited to one year from the enactment date of December 22, 2017.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, our provision for income taxes was $27.9$18.0 million, equatingwhich included a $7.1 million tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price, partially offset by $4.6 million of income tax expense for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance primarily related to net operating loss carryforwards for Piper Sandler Ltd. In addition, pursuant to SAB 118, we recorded an additional $1.0 million of income tax expense for the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets at the lower enacted federal corporate tax rate. Excluding the impact of these items, our effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests, of 34.9was 26.5 percent.


For the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, our provision for income taxes was $36.0$53.8 million, equatingwhich included a non-cash tax charge of $36.4 million for the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets arising from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the lower enacted federal corporate tax rate and a $9.0 million tax benefit related to anstock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price. Excluding the impact of these items, our effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests, of 36.3 percent.was 34.4 percent.



Financial Performance from Continuing Operations




Segment Performance

We measure financial performance byOur activities as an investment bank and institutional securities firm constitute a single business segment. Our two reportable segments are Capital Markets and Asset Management. We determined these segments based upon the nature of the financial products and services provided to customers and our management organization. Segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin are used to evaluate and measure segment performance by our chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance in relation to our competitors. Revenues and expenses directly associated with each respective segment are included in determining segment operating results. Revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a particular segment are allocated based upon our allocation methodologies, generally based on each segment’s respective net revenues, use of shared resources, headcount or other relevant measures.


Throughout this section, we have presented segment results on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin, each a non-GAAP measure, in conjunction with the corresponding U.S. GAAP measures provides a more meaningful basis for comparison of its operating results and underlying trends between periods, and enhances the overall understanding of our current financial performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. The non-GAAP segment results should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, the segment results prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.


Adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin exclude (1) revenues and expenses related to noncontrolling interests, (2) amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, (3) compensation and non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements and (4) acquisition-related restructuring and acquisition integration costs and (5) goodwill impairment charges.costs. For U.S. GAAP purposes, these items are included in each of their respective line items on the consolidated statements of operations.


Adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin present the segments' results of operations excluding the impact resulting from the consolidation of noncontrolling interests in alternative asset management funds and private equity investment vehicles.funds. Consolidation of these funds results in the inclusion of the proportionate share of the income or loss attributable to the equity interests in consolidated funds that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to us (i.e., noncontrolling interests). This proportionate share is reflected in net incomeincome/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and has no effect on theour overall financial performance, of the segments, as ultimately, this income or loss is not income or loss for the segments themselves.us. Included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin is the actual proportionate share of the income or loss attributable to us as an investor in such funds.


Adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin also exclude amortization of intangible assets and compensation and non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements. These amounts are excluded on a non-GAAP basis as they represent expenses specifically related to acquisitions that will eventually be fully amortized and therefore not part of our on-going operations. The acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs excluded from adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin represent charges that resulted from severance benefits, vacating redundant leased office space, and contract termination costs. Restructuringcosts and professional fees related to the transaction. These restructuring and integration costs are excluded from our non-GAAP financial measures as they generally relate to an acquisition or a specific event and excluding these amounts provides a better understanding of our core non-compensation expenses. Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding the acquisition-related amounts and restructuring and integration costs provides clarity on the financial results generated by the core operating components of our business. The non-cash goodwill impairment charge recognized in 2016 relates to the asset management reporting unit and primarily pertains to goodwill created from the 2010 acquisition of ARI.


Capital Markets

The following table sets forth the Capital Markets adjusted segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152019 2018
  Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)    Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Investment banking                              
Financing               
Equities$71,161
 $
 $
 $71,161
 $114,468
 $
 $
 $114,468
Debt115,013
 
 
 115,013
 91,195
 
 
 91,195
Advisory services304,654
 
 
 304,654
 209,163
 
 
 209,163
$440,695
 $
 $
 $440,695
 $394,133
 $
 $
 $394,133
Equity financing104,563
 
 
 104,563
 122,172
 
 
 122,172
Debt financing85,701
 
 
 85,701
 73,262
 
 
 73,262
Total investment banking490,828
 
 
 490,828
 414,826
 
 
 414,826
630,959
 
 
 630,959
 589,567
 
 
 589,567
                              
Institutional sales and trading                              
Equities87,992
 
 
 87,992
 78,584
 
 
 78,584
88,792
 
 
 88,792
 77,477
 
 
 77,477
Fixed income90,495
 971
 
 91,466
 93,489
 816
 
 94,305
94,922
 
 
 94,922
 67,784
 
 
 67,784
Total institutional sales and trading178,487
 971
 
 179,458
 172,073
 816
 
 172,889
183,714
 
 
 183,714
 145,261
 
 
 145,261
                              
Total management and performance fees6,363
 
 
 6,363
 4,642
 
 
 4,642
               
Investment income14,692
 10,099
 
 24,791
 15,474
 8,994
 
 24,468
12,324
 10,769
 
 23,093
 8,297
 3,621
 
 11,918
                              
Long-term financing expenses(9,136) 
 
 (9,136) (7,494) 
 
 (7,494)
Other financing expenses(3,200) 
 
 (3,200) (5,793) 
 
 (5,793)
                              
Net revenues681,234
 11,070
 
 692,304
 599,521
 9,810
 
 609,331
823,797
 10,769
 
 834,566
 737,332
 3,621
 
 740,953
                              
Operating expenses580,974
 2,864
 62,025
 645,863
 511,241
 3,403
 16,293
 530,937
687,410
 4,306
 23,871
 715,587
 628,850
 4,827
 34,787
 668,464
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income$100,260
 $8,206
 $(62,025) $46,441
 $88,280
 $6,407
 $(16,293) $78,394
Pre-tax operating income$136,387
 $6,463
 $(23,871) $118,979
 $108,482
 $(1,206) $(34,787) $72,489
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin14.7%     6.7% 14.7%     12.9%
Pre-tax operating margin16.6%     14.3% 14.7%     9.8%
(1)The following is a summary of the adjustments needed to reconcile our consolidated U.S. GAAP segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin to the adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin:
Noncontrolling interests – The impacts of consolidating noncontrolling interests in our alternative asset management funds and private equity investment vehicles are not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin.
Other Adjustmentsadjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 20152019 2018
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$36,241
 $4,019
$5,138
 $29,246
Restructuring and integration costs10,197
 10,652
Acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs14,321
 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions15,587
 1,622
4,298
 4,858
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements114
 683
$62,025
 $16,293
$23,871
 $34,787


Capital Markets netNet revenues on a U.S. GAAP basis increased 13.612.6 percent to $692.3$834.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019, compared with $609.3$741.0 million in the prior-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Capital Markets2019, adjusted net revenues were $681.2$823.8 million compared with $599.5$737.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.The2018. The variance explanations for net revenues and adjusted net revenues are consistent on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis.basis unless stated otherwise.



Investment banking revenues comprise all of the revenues generated through equity and debt financing and advisory services activities, which includeincludes mergers and acquisitions, equity private placements, debt and restructuring advisory, and municipal financial advisory transactions.transactions, as well as equity and debt financing activities. To assess the profitability of investment banking, we aggregate investment banking fees with the net interest income or expense associated with these activities.


In 2016,2019, investment banking revenues increased 18.37.0 percent to $490.8$631.0 million compared with $414.8$589.6 million in the corresponding period of the prior year, as strong advisory services and debt financing revenues were partially offset by lower equity financing revenues.year. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, advisory services revenues increased 11.8 percent to $304.7$440.7 million, compared with $209.2$394.1 million in 2015. The increase reflects our long-term effort2018, due to grow our advisory services business, including expansion into the energy and financial institutions sectors over the past year. Our revenues increased more than 45 percent compared to the prior year while mergers and acquisitions activity was declining, which reflects meaningful market share gains. Our debt advisory group also contributed to the strong results. We completed 150transactions with larger median fees. In 2019, we completed 178 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $22.3$34.0 billion, in 2016, compared with 82170 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $23.0$28.9 billion in 2015.2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, equity financing revenues were $104.6 million, down 14.4 percent compared with $122.2 million in the strong prior-year period, due to fewer completed transactions. Equity financing activity was slow in the first half of 2019 due to the impact of the federal government shut down. Additionally, the cyclical energy market was not conducive to equity financing activity throughout 2019. During 2019, we completed 74 equity financings, compared with 85 equity financings in the year-ago period. Debt financing revenues for the year ended December 31, 20162019 were $115.0$85.7 million, an increase of 26.1up 17.0 percent compared with $91.2$73.3 million in the year-ago period, duedriven by an increase in municipal market issuance volumes. The increase was driven by lower interest rates leading to higher public finance revenues. Our public finance business benefited from increased new money issuance volumes and refunding activity, as well as market share gains attributablehigher new money issuance volumes. Market conditions improved as the year progressed due to our geographicthe reduction in interest rates and sector expansion. In 2016, our par value from negotiated municipal issuances increased 17.2 percent, compared to 10.5 percent for the industry.investor demand. During 2016,2019, we completed 718563 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $16.7$12.2 billion, compared with 707438 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $14.3$11.5 billion during the prior-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2016, equity financing revenues were $71.2 million, down 37.8 percent compared with $114.5 million in the prior-year period, due to fewer completed transactions and lower revenue per transaction. The equity capital raising business experienced challenging market conditions for most of the year. The total available fee pool in the sub-$2 billion market decreased 33 percent in 2016. Contributions from our expansion into the energy and financial institutions sectors partially offset the impact of the significant decrease in capital raising. During 2016, we completed 68 equity financings, raising $13.7 billion for our clients, compared with 95 equity financings, raising $17.4 billion for our clients in the year-ago period.


Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all of the revenues generated through trading activities, which consist of facilitating customer trades, executing competitive municipal underwritings and our strategic trading activities in municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government agency securities.bonds. To assess the profitability of institutional brokerage activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the net interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or short inventory positions. Our results may vary from quarter to quarter as a result of changes in trading margins, trading gains and losses, net interest spreads, trading volumes, the timing of payments for research services, and the timing of transactions based on market opportunities.


For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, institutional brokerage revenues increased 3.826.5 percent to $179.5$183.7 million, compared with $172.9$145.3 million in the prior-year period, as higher equity institutional brokerage revenues were partially offset by lower fixed income institutional brokerage revenues.period. Equity institutional brokerage revenues were $88.0$88.8 million in 2016,2019, up 12.014.6 percent compared with $78.6$77.5 million in 2015. The increase reflects2018, as the five months of incremental revenues from the addition of Weeden & Co. to our expansion intoplatform more than offset the energydecline in revenues due to low volatility and financial institutions sectors and expanded research capabilities.volumes. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $91.5$94.9 million, down 3.0up 40.0 percent compared with $94.3$67.8 million in the prior-year period. The additionincrease was driven by a combination of BMO GKSTincreasing client activity, conducive market conditions and strong execution. Additionally, markets were challenging in the prior year. In the first quarter of 2018, industry returns for municipal bonds were the worst in nearly a decade and customer demand was muted due to the impact of tax reform on the municipal asset class. Also, macroeconomic concerns caused yields to swiftly move lower in the fourth quarter of 2015 resulted in gains to our customer flow business in 2016, which were offset by lower trading gains from fewer trading opportunities. Challenging market conditions at various times during the year negatively impacted our trading opportunities, which reduced our revenues. Credit spreads were volatile in the first quarter, and the municipal market, in which we have a meaningful presence, was volatile in the fourth quarter.2018.


Management and performance fees include the fees generated from our merchant banking, energy, senior living and municipal bond funds with outside investors. For the year ended December 31, 2016, management and performance fees were $6.4 million, up 37.1 percent compared with $4.6 million in the prior-year period, due to incremental management fees generated from two energy funds, which we acquired with the Simmons acquisition, as well as higher performance fees from our merchant banking fund. These increases were offset by lower management fees from a municipal bond fund, which we closed in the third quarter of 2015.

Investment income includes realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, in our merchant banking, fund, municipal bond fund,energy and senior living fund,funds, as well as management and other firm investments.performance fees generated from those funds. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, investment income was $24.8$23.1 million, compared to $24.5$11.9 million in 2015.2018. In 2016, higher gains on the senior living fund that2019, we manage, as well asrecorded higher gains on our firm investments, were offset by lower gainsinvestment and the noncontrolling interests in ourthe merchant banking fund.funds that we manage. Excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests, adjusted investment income was $14.7$12.3 million in 2016.2019 and $8.3 million in 2018.


Long-termOther financing expenses primarily represent interest paid on our senior notes. For the year ended December 31, 2016, long-term financing expenses increased to $9.1 million, compared to $7.5 million in the prior-year period, as we increased the amount of outstanding principalnotes along with commitment fees on our senior notes in the fourth quarterline of 2015 from $125 million to $175 million.

Capital Markets segment pre-tax operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased to 6.7 percent, compared with 12.9 percent for 2015, due to higher acquisition-related costs. Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin of 14.7 percent forcredit and revolving credit facility. For the year ended December 31, 20162019, other financing expenses decreased to $3.2 million, compared with $5.8 million in the prior-year period. We repaid $125 million of fixed rate senior notes upon maturity on October 9, 2018, reducing financing expenses in 2019. The reduction in financing expenses was consistent with 2015. In 2016, a decrease in our non-compensation ratio waspartially offset by the issuance of $175 million of fixed rate senior notes on October 15, 2019 to finance a higher compensation ratioportion of our acquisition of Sandler O'Neill. We expect other financing expenses to increase in 2020 due to our mixa full year of business.interest on the fixed rate senior notes.

Pre-tax operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 14.3 percent, compared with 9.8 percent for 2018. The increase in pre-tax operating margin was driven by higher revenues and lower acquisition-related compensation which was partially offset by higher acquisition-related restructuring and integration costs. Adjusted pre-tax operating margin increased to 16.6 percent in 2019, compared with 14.7 percent in 2018, due to higher revenues.


The following table sets forth the Capital Markets adjusted segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142018 2017
  Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)    Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Investment banking                              
Financing               
Equities$114,468
 $
 $
 $114,468
 $109,706
 $
 $
 $109,706
Debt91,195
 
 
 91,195
 63,005
 
 
 63,005
Advisory services209,163
 
 
 209,163
 197,880
 
 
 197,880
$394,133
 $
 $
 $394,133
 $443,303
 $
 $
 $443,303
Equity financing122,172
 
 
 122,172
 98,996
 
 
 98,996
Debt financing73,262
 
 
 73,262
 93,434
 
 
 93,434
Total investment banking414,826
 
 
 414,826
 370,591
 
 
 370,591
589,567
 
 
 589,567
 635,733
 
 
 635,733
                              
Institutional sales and trading                              
Equities78,584
 
 
 78,584
 82,211
 
 
 82,211
77,477
 
 
 77,477
 81,717
 
 
 81,717
Fixed income93,489
 816
 
 94,305
 92,200
 
 
 92,200
67,784
 
 
 67,784
 89,609
 
 
 89,609
Total institutional sales and trading172,073
 816
 
 172,889
 174,411
 
 
 174,411
145,261
 
 
 145,261
 171,326
 
 
 171,326
                              
Total management and performance fees4,642
 
 
 4,642
 5,398
 
 
 5,398
               
Investment income15,474
 8,994
 
 24,468
 8,347
 15,699
 
 24,046
8,297
 3,621
 
 11,918
 18,919
 5,319
 
 24,238
                              
Long-term financing expenses(7,494) 
 
 (7,494) (6,655) 
 
 (6,655)
Other financing expenses(5,793) 
 
 (5,793) (7,676) 
 
 (7,676)
                              
Net revenues599,521
 9,810
 
 609,331
 552,092
 15,699
 
 567,791
737,332
 3,621
 
 740,953
 818,302
 5,319
 
 823,621
                              
Operating expenses511,241
 3,403
 16,293
 530,937
 467,198
 4,546
 6,917
 478,661
628,850
 4,827
 34,787
 668,464
 675,596
 2,932
 65,777
 744,305
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income$88,280
 $6,407
 $(16,293) $78,394
 $84,894
 $11,153
 $(6,917) $89,130
Pre-tax operating income$108,482
 $(1,206) $(34,787) $72,489
 $142,706
 $2,387
 $(65,777) $79,316
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin14.7%     12.9% 15.4%     15.7%
Pre-tax operating margin14.7%     9.8% 17.4%     9.6%
(1)Other Adjustments – The following table sets forthis a summary of the items not included inadjustments needed to reconcile our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin to the adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:margin:
Noncontrolling interests – The impacts of consolidating noncontrolling interests in our alternative asset management funds are not included in adjusted pre-tax operating income and adjusted pre-tax operating margin.
Other adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted pre-tax operating income and adjusted pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2015 20142018 2017
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$4,019
 $3,945
$29,246
 $54,999
Restructuring and integration costs10,652
 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions1,622
 2,972
4,858
 10,178
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements683
 600
$16,293
 $6,917
$34,787
 $65,777



Capital Markets netNet revenues on a U.S. GAAP basis were $609.3decreased 10.0 percent to $741.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, compared with $567.8$823.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017. For the year ended December 31, 2015, Capital Markets2018, adjusted net revenues were $599.5$737.3 million compared with $552.1$818.3 million in the prior year. The variance explanations for net revenues and adjusted net revenues are consistent on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis.basis unless stated otherwise.


In 2015,2018, investment banking revenues increased 11.9decreased 7.3 percent to $414.8$589.6 million compared with $370.6$635.7 million in the prior year, due primarily to strong debt financing and advisory services revenues.2017. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, advisory services revenues decreased 11.1 percent to $394.1 million, compared with $443.3 million in 2017. The number of completed transactions increased from the prior year, however, revenues declined as 2017 was elevated by several large fees. We completed 170 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $28.9 billion during 2018, compared with 163 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $34.3 billion in 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, equity financing revenues were $114.5$122.2 million, up 4.323.4 percent compared with $109.7$99.0 million in the prior-year period, as a result of more completed transactions and slightly2017, due to higher revenue per transaction. WeThe number of deals in which we were bookrunner on 70increased approximately seven percent of our transactions in 2015 compared to 52 percent2017. Strong valuations and stable markets through the first three quarters of 2018 created optimum IPO conditions in 2014.the market. During 2015,2018, we completed 9585 equity financings, raising $17.4 billion for our clients, compared with 9084 equity financings raising $20.5 billion for our clients in 2014.2017. Debt financing revenues for the year ended December 31, 20152018 were $91.2$73.3 million, up 44.7a decrease of 21.6 percent compared with $63.0$93.4 million in the prior year,2017, due to higherlower public finance revenues resulting from market-wide increasesas municipal market issuance volume declined meaningfully compared to 2017. The first quarter of 2018 experienced a significant decline in public finance issuance volume due to record issuance volume in the fourth quarter of 2017 as issuers accelerated financings before implementation of federal tax law changes in 2018. Municipal market issuance volume began to rebound after the first quarter of municipal issuances2018, but it was still down approximately 24 percent on a year-over-year basis as the increase in 2015, as well as market share gains attributable to our geographic and sector expansion and product diversification. In 2015, our par value from negotiated debt issuances increased 49.8 percent, compared to 18.7 percent fornew money issuance volume did not offset the industry.significant decrease in refunding activity. During 2015,2018, we completed 707438 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $14.3$11.5 billion, compared with 485622 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $9.5$15.3 billion during 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2015, advisory services revenues increased to $209.2 million, compared with $197.9 million in 2014, due to increased mergers and acquisitions services revenues from higher revenue per transaction. Our strategic focus to grow our mergers and acquisitions resources in the middle market and continued leadership in the healthcare sector has resulted in market share gains and increased revenues. We completed 82 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $23.0 billion during 2015, compared with 91 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $14.7 billion in 2014.2017.

In 2015, institutional brokerage revenues decreased slightly to $172.9 million, compared with $174.4 million in 2014, due to lower equity institutional brokerage revenues, partially offset by higher fixed income institutional brokerage revenues. Equity institutional brokerage revenues were $78.6 million in 2015, down 4.4 percent compared with $82.2 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to lower client trading volumes, offset in part by contributions from our financial institutions group expansion. For the year ended December 31, 2015, fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $94.3 million, up slightly compared with $92.2 million in the prior year, as a decline in strategic trading revenues was more than offset by solid performance in our customer flow business and incremental revenues associated with our acquisition of BMO GKST.


For the year ended December 31, 2015, management and performance fees2018, institutional brokerage revenues decreased 15.2 percent to $145.3 million, compared with $171.3 million in 2017. Equity institutional brokerage revenues were $4.6$77.5 million in 2018, down 14.05.2 percent compared with $5.4$81.7 million in 2014,2017, due to decreased performance feeschanges in how equity market participants pay for equity research and trade execution services at a time when the overall fee pool was shrinking. Global market participants began shifting trade execution to low-touch providers and paying for research services separately, a result of MiFID II regulation that became effective in the European Union at the beginning of 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $67.8 million, down 24.4 percent compared with $89.6 million in the prior year, due primarily to lower trading gains resulting from limited trading opportunities and unfavorable markets, as well as a decline in customer flow activity. Market conditions were challenging as low relative, but rising, interest rates and a flattened yield curve persisted throughout 2018 and resulted in reduced client volumes and limited trading opportunities. Our results were disproportionately impacted by the challenging fixed income markets in 2018 given our municipal bond fund, partially offset by higher performance fees from our merchant banking fund. In the third quarter of 2015, we closedmeaningful exposure to the municipal bond fund and completed its liquidation in October 2015.market where customer demand was muted due to the impact of federal tax reform on the municipal asset class.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, investment income was $24.5$11.9 million, compared to $24.0$24.2 million in 2014.2017. In 2015,2018, we recorded higherlower gains onin our merchant banking activities, which were offset by lower gainsfunds and on the municipal bond fund with outside investors that we liquidated in the fourth quarter of 2015.our other firm investments. Excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests, adjusted investment income was $15.5$8.3 million in 2015.2018 and $18.9 million in 2017.


In 2015, long-term2018, other financing expenses increaseddecreased to $7.5$5.8 million, compared to $6.7$7.7 million in the prior year, as we increased the amountyear. We repaid $50 million of outstanding principal on ourvariable rate senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2015 fromupon maturity on May 31, 2017. Also, we repaid our $125 million to $175 million.of fixed rate senior notes upon maturity on October 8, 2018.


Capital Markets segment pre-taxPre-tax operating margin for 2015 decreased2018 increased slightly to 12.99.8 percent, compared with 15.79.6 percent for 2014.2017. Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for 2015 decreased to 14.7 percent, compared with 15.4 percent for 2014. The decrease in pre-tax operating margin was due14.7 percent in 2018, compared with 17.4 percent in 2017. The decreased adjusted pre-tax operating margin was primarily attributable to higher non-compensationlower adjusted net revenues. The new accounting guidance requiring the gross presentation of client reimbursed deal expenses, resulting from a legal settlement as well as additional expenses associated with our acquisitions of River Branch and BMO GKST and our financial institutions group expansion.which totaled $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, reduced pre-tax operating margin by 50 basis points in 2018.

Asset ManagementDiscontinued Operations


The following table sets forthDiscontinued operations includes our traditional asset management subsidiary, ARI, which we sold in the third quarter of 2019. ARI's results, previously reported in our Asset Management segment, financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating marginhave been presented as discontinued operations for theall periods presented:presented.

The components of discontinued operations were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
   Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
 Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Management fees               
Equity$28,164
 $
 $
 $28,164
 $38,249
 $
 $
 $38,249
MLP25,561
 
 
 25,561
 31,918
 
 
 31,918
Total management fees53,725
 
 
 53,725
 70,167
 
 
 70,167
                
Performance fees               
Equity584
     584
 208
 
 
 208
MLP
     
 
 
 
 
Total performance fees584
 
 
 584
 208
 
 
 208
                
Total management and performance fees54,309
 
 
 54,309
 70,375
 
 
 70,375
                
Investment income/(loss)736
 
 
 736
 (6,788) 
 
 (6,788)
                
Total net revenues55,045
 
 
 55,045
 63,587
 
 
 63,587
                
Operating expenses43,824
 
 88,536
 132,360
 49,304
 
 6,254
 55,558
                
Segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)$11,221
 $
 $(88,536) $(77,315) $14,283
 $
 $(6,254) $8,029
                
Segment pre-tax operating margin20.4%     (140.5)% 22.5%     12.6%
                
Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income/(loss) (2)19.3%       29.9%      
  Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Net revenues $26,546
 $43,489
 $51,301
       
Operating expenses 22,589
 35,227
 40,356
Intangible asset amortization and impairment (1) 5,465
 5,602
 5,222
Restructuring costs 10,268
 272
 
Goodwill impairment 
 
 114,363
Total non-interest expenses 38,322
 41,101
 159,941
       
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations before income tax expense/(benefit) (11,776) 2,388
 (108,640)
       
Income tax expense/(benefit) (2,522) 1,001
 (23,580)
       
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations before gain on sales (9,254) 1,387
 (85,060)
       
Gain on sales, net of tax 33,026
 
 
       
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $23,772
 $1,387
 $(85,060)
(1)Other Adjustments – The following table sets forthIncludes $2.9 million of intangible asset impairment related to the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income/(loss) and adjusted segment pre-tax operating marginARI trade name for the periods presented:year ended December 31, 2019.

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$
 $214
Restructuring and integration costs9
 
Goodwill impairment82,900
 
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions5,627
 6,040
 $88,536
 $6,254
(2)Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income/(loss), a non-GAAP measure, provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of Asset Management operating results across periods.


Management and performance fee revenues comprise the revenues generated from management and investment advisory services performed for separately managed accounts, registered funds and partnerships. Client asset inflows and outflows and investment performance have a direct effect on management and performance fee revenues. Management fees are generally based on the levelRestructuring costs of assets under management ("AUM") measured monthly or quarterly, and an increase or reduction in AUM, due to market price fluctuations or net client asset flows, will result in a corresponding increase or decrease in management fees. Fees vary with the type of assets managed and the vehicle in which they are managed. Performance fees are earned when the investment return on AUM exceeds certain benchmark targets or other performance targets over a specified measurement period. The level of performance fees earned can vary significantly from period to period and these fees may not necessarily be correlated to changes in total AUM. The majority of performance fees, if earned, are generally recorded in the fourth quarter of the applicable year or upon withdrawal of client assets. At December 31, 2016, approximately five percent of our AUM was eligible to earn performance fees.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, management fees were $53.7$10.3 million a decrease of 23.4 percent, compared with $70.2 million in the prior-year period, due to decreased management fees from both our equity and MLP product offerings. In 2016, management fees related to our equity strategies were $28.2 million, down 26.4 percent compared to 2015, driven by lower AUM from net client outflows in our value equity products amid tough market trends for active asset managers and underperformance in certain of our strategies. Management fees from our MLP strategies decreased 19.9 percent in 2016 to $25.6 million compared with $31.9 million in 2015. The decline in management fees resulted from lower average AUM, driven by a decline in MLP valuations.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, performance fees were $0.6 million, compared to $0.2 million in the prior-year period. The performance fees recorded in 2016 and 2015 resulted from certain funds exceeding their performance targets over a specified measurement period.

Investment income/(loss) includes gains and losses from our investments in registered funds and private funds or partnerships that we manage. In 2016, we recorded investment income of $0.7 million, compared with a loss of $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The investment loss in 2015 was driven by losses in MLP investments.

Segment pre-tax operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2016 was a negative 140.5 percent, compared to 12.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2015. The negative pre-tax operating margin in 2016 was driven by the $82.9 million goodwill impairment charge. Excluding investment income/(loss) on firm capital invested in our strategies, adjusted operating margin declined from 29.9 percent in 2015 to 19.3 percent in 2016, due to lower management fees.


The following table sets forth the Asset Management segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:

 Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014
   Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
 Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Management fees               
Equity$38,249
 $
 $
 $38,249
 $47,987
 $
 $
 $47,987
MLP31,918
 
 
 31,918
 30,785
 
 
 30,785
Total management fees70,167
 
 
 70,167
 78,772
 
 
 78,772
                
Performance fees               
Equity208
 
 
 208
 684
 
 
 684
MLP
 
 
 
 208
 
 
 208
Total performance fees208
 
 
 208
 892
 
 
 892
                
Total management and performance fees70,375
 
 
 70,375
 79,664
 
 
 79,664
                
Investment income/(loss)(6,788) 
 
 (6,788) 683
 
 
 683
                
Total net revenues63,587
 
 
 63,587
 80,347
 
 
 80,347
                
Operating expenses49,304
 
 6,254
 55,558
 51,582
 
 7,584
 59,166
                
Segment pre-tax operating income$14,283
 $
 $(6,254) $8,029
 $28,765
 $
 $(7,584) $21,181
                
Segment pre-tax operating margin22.5%     12.6% 35.8%     26.4%
                
Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income/(loss) (2)29.9%       35.3%      
(1)Other Adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2015 2014
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$214
 $1,284
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions6,040
 6,300
 $6,254
 $7,584
(2)Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income/(loss), a non-GAAP measure, provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of Asset Management operating results across periods.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, management fees were $70.2 million, a decrease of 10.9 percent, compared with $78.8 million in 2014, due to decreased management fees from our equity strategies. In 2015, management fees related to our equity strategies were $38.2 million, down 20.3 percent compared to 2014, due to lower average AUM from net client outflows and market depreciation, as well as a lower average effective yield. The average effective revenue yield for our equity strategies was 69 basis points in 2015, compared to 78 basis points in the prior year. The decline in the average effective revenue yield was driven by large new investments from institutional investors, which have a lower fee structure. Management fees from our MLP strategies increased 3.7 percent in 2015 to $31.9 million, compared with $30.8 million in 2014, due to higher average effective revenue yields, partially offset by lower AUM, driven by sharp declines in MLP valuations. The average effective revenue yield for our MLP strategies was 61 basis points in 2015, compared to 54 basis points in 2014. The increase in the average effective revenue yield was due to more assets from individual investors in open-ended mutual funds, which earned higher fees.


For the year ended December 31, 2015, performance fees were $0.2 million, compared to $0.9 million in 2014. The performance fees recorded in 2015 and 2014 primarily resulted from certain funds exceeding their performance targets over a specified measurement period or at the time of client asset withdrawals.

In 2015, we recorded an investment loss of $6.8 million driven by losses in MLP investments, compared with income of $0.7 million in 2014.

Segment pre-tax operating margin for 2015 was 12.6 percent, compared to 26.4 percent for 2014. Excluding investment income/(loss) on firm capital invested in our strategies, adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 29.9 percent, compared to 35.3 percent for the year ended December 31, 2014, due2019 primarily relate to lower management fees.transaction costs and payments associated with the sale of the business.


The following table summarizes the changesSee Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements in our AUM for the periods presented:
 Twelve Months Ended
 December 31,
(Dollars in millions)2016 2015 2014
Equity     
Beginning of period$4,954
 $5,758
 $6,683
Net outflows(1,331) (572) (979)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)492
 (232) 54
End of period$4,115
 $4,954
 $5,758
      
MLP     
Beginning of period$3,924
 $5,711
 $4,549
Net inflows/(outflows)(286) 434
 719
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)978
 (2,221) 443
End of period$4,616
 $3,924
 $5,711
      
Total     
Beginning of period$8,878
 $11,469
 $11,232
Net outflows(1,617) (138) (260)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)1,470
 (2,453) 497
End of period$8,731
 $8,878
 $11,469

At December 31, 2016, total AUM was $8.7 billion. Equity AUM was $4.1 billion at December 31, 2016, compared to $5.0 billion at December 31, 2015, as net client outflows of $1.3 billion were partially offset by net market appreciation of $0.5 billion. The asset management industry has experienced an ongoing trend of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management. Our AUM outflows in 2016 reflected the impactPart II, Item 8 of this trend, including a large investor inForm 10-K for further discussion of our all-cap product shifting to a passive investment. In addition, performance in our small/mid-cap and all-cap value strategies has lagged their relative benchmarks which has contributed to client outflows. These outflows were partially offset by client inflows related to the addition of an aggressive growth equity team in the fourth quarter of 2016. MLP AUM increased to $4.6 billion at December 31, 2016 as net market appreciation of $1.0 billion more than offset net client outflows of $0.3 billion.discontinued operations.


Total AUM decreased to $8.9 billion in 2015 driven by net market depreciation in our MLP product offerings. Equity AUM was $5.0 billion at December 31, 2015, compared to $5.8 billion at December 31, 2014 due to net client outflows and net market depreciation during the period. In 2015, our performance in our small/mid-cap value strategy lagged its relative benchmark, which contributed to client outflows, as did the continued movement to passive funds over actively-managed funds. These outflows were offset by client inflows related to our international and energy strategies. MLP AUM decreased $1.8 billion to $3.9 billion at December 31, 2015 as net market depreciation of $2.2 billion was partially offset by net client inflows of $0.4 billion.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements


Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and are incorporated herein by reference.


Critical Accounting Policies


Our accounting and reporting policies comply with U.S. GAAP and conform to practices within the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in compliance with U.S. GAAP and industry practices requires us to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies that we believe to be the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require us to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by us to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical, including whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information (e.g., third party or independent sources), the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under U.S. GAAP.


For a full description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our critical accounting policies.

Valuation of Financial Instruments


Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, and certain of our investments recorded in investments on our consolidated statements of financial condition consist of financial instruments recorded at fair value, either as required by accounting guidance or through the fair value election.guidance. Unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations.


The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). Based on the nature of our business and our role as a "dealer" in the securities industry or as a manager of alternative asset management funds, the fair values of our financial instruments are determined internally. See Note 2 and Note 67 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on the valuation of our financial instruments and our fair value processes, including specific control processes to determine the reasonableness of the fair value of our financial instruments.


Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I measurements) and the lowest priority to inputs with little or no pricing observability (Level III measurements). Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. See Note 67 to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of our assets and liabilities in the fair value hierarchy.



Goodwill and Intangible Assets


We record all assets acquired and liabilities acquiredassumed in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangible assets, at fair value. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired requires certain management estimates. At December 31, 2016,2019, we had goodwill of $196.2 million. The goodwill balance consists of $81.9$87.6 million recorded within our capital markets segment, of which $60.7 million is attributable to our 2016 acquisition of Simmons. The remaining $114.4 million relates to our asset management segment. At December 31, 2016, we hadand intangible assets of $37.2 million, of which $19.3 million relates to our capital markets segment and $17.9 million relates to our asset management segment.$16.7 million.


We are required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets annually and on an interim basis when circumstances exist that could indicate possible impairment. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after making an assessment, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment testfurther analysis is unnecessary. However, if we conclude otherwise, then we are required to perform the two-step impairmenta quantitative goodwill test, which requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The quantitative goodwill test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including allocated goodwill. An impairment is recognized for the excess amount of a reporting unit's carrying value over its fair value. See Note 1312 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on our goodwill impairment testing.


The initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the subsequent quantitative impairment analysis involves significant judgment in determining the estimates of future cash flows, discount rates, economic forecast and other assumptions which are then used in acceptable valuation techniques, such as the market approach (earnings and/or transaction multiples) and/or the income approach (discounted cash flow method). Changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value and any resulting impairment of goodwill. Our estimated cash flows, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time period. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, and market conditions. To assess the reasonableness of cash flow estimates and validate assumptions used in our estimates, we review historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets. In assessing the fair value of our reporting units,unit, the volatile nature of the securities markets and our industry requires us to consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage of the cycle in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. In addition to discounted cash flows, we consider earnings multiples of comparable public companies and multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions transactions of similar businesses in our subsequent impairment analysis.

We performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis based on financial information as of October 31, 2016, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $82.9 million. The charge relates to the asset management reporting unit and primarily pertains to goodwill created from the 2010 acquisition of ARI. The impairment charge resulted from net outflows of AUM in 2016 as a result of an extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management, combined with certain investment strategies having performance below their benchmarks, which led to reduced management fees and profitability. In addition, lower average AUM for our MLP strategies, driven by a decline in MLP valuations, resulted in decreased management fees and profitability. The fair value of the asset management reporting unit was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method based on revenue and EBITDA forecasts) and market approach (earnings multiples of comparable public companies), which are valuation techniques we believe market participants would use for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill was determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. The implied fair value of goodwill is the excess value of the reporting unit over the fair value assigned to its assets and liabilities.


We elected to perform a qualitative assessment to test the goodwill in our capital markets reporting unit for impairment. The following relevant events and circumstances were evaluated in concluding that it was not more likely than not that this goodwill was impaired: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, and the overall financial performance of the capital markets reporting unit. Our annual goodwill impairment testing, performed as of October 31, 2019, resulted in no impairment.

We also evaluated our intangible assets and concluded there was no impairment in 2019 associated with the capital markets reporting unit.

We also evaluated intangible assets (indefinite and definite-lived) and concluded there was no impairment in 2016.


Compensation Plans


Stock-Based Compensation Plans


As part of our compensation to employees and directors, we use stock-based compensation, consisting of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options. We account for equity awards in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, "Compensation–Stock Compensation," ("ASC 718"), which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized on the consolidated statements of operations at grant date fair value. Compensation expense related to share-based awards which require future service are amortized over the service period of the award, netaward. Forfeitures of estimated forfeitures.awards with service conditions are accounted for when they occur. Share-based awards that do not require future service are recognized in the year in which the awards are deemed to be earned.


See Note 2120 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about our stock-based compensation plans.


Income Taxes


We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, which includes all of our qualifying subsidiaries. We also are subject to income tax in various states and municipalities and those foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Amounts provided for income taxes are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basesbasis and for tax loss carry-forwards.carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences in reporting certain items, principally restricted compensation (i.e., restricted stock, restricted stock units, options, restricted mutual fund shares, (MFRS awards), and deferred compensation). The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recognized to the extent that it is more likely than not that any portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We believe that our future taxable profits will be sufficient to recognize our U.S. deferred tax assets. However, if our projections of future taxable profits do not materialize, we may conclude that a valuation allowance is necessary, which would impact our results of operations in that period. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we have recorded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $0.8$4.4 million representing the entire deferred tax asset related to net operating loss carryforwards within Simmons & Company International Limited ("SCIL").in the U.K. for Piper Sandler Ltd.


We record deferred tax benefits for future tax deductions expected upon the vesting of stock-based compensation. We recognize the income tax effects of stock-based compensation awards in the income statement when the awards vest. If deductions reported on our tax return for stock-based compensation (i.e., the value of the stock-based compensation at the time of vesting) exceed the cumulative cost of those instruments recognized for financial reporting (i.e., the grant date fair value of the compensation computed in accordance with ASC 718), we record the excess tax benefit as additional paid-in capital.income tax benefit. Conversely, if deductions reported on our tax return for stock-based compensation are less than the cumulative cost of those instruments recognized for financial reporting, we offset the deficiency first to any previously recognized excess tax benefits recorded as additional paid-in capital and any remaining deficiency is recorded as income tax expense. As discussed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, beginning January 1, 2017, new accounting guidance requires us to recognizeFor the income tax effects of stock-based compensation awards in the income statement when the awards vest, rather than as additional paid-in capital. As ofyear ended December 31, 2016,2019, we had $7.3recorded a $5.1 million of excess tax benefits recorded as additional paid-in capital, which will remain in additional paid-in capital.benefit from continuing operations for stock awards vesting during the period. In the first quarter of 2017,2020, approximately 4,000 options expired and 611,000266,000 shares vested atvested. Based upon the share prices greater thanat vesting, the grant date fair value, resulting in $7.1 million of excess tax benefits recorded as income tax benefit in the first quarter of 2017.expense/(benefit) is not material.


We establish reserves for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, "Income Taxes," when it is not more likely than not that a certain position or component of a position will be ultimately upheld by the relevant taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in evaluating uncertain tax positions. Our tax provision and related accruals include the impact of estimates for uncertain tax positions and changes to the reserves that are considered appropriate. To the extent the probable tax outcome of these matters changes, such change in estimate will impact the income tax provision in the period of change and, in turn, our results of operations. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded a $4.1 million liability for uncertain income tax positions related to our acquisition of Weeden & Co. This liability was recorded as a measurement period adjustment in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, "Business Combinations," and includes a corresponding indemnification asset.



Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources


Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient liquidity resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial institution failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity position and maintain a liquidity strategy designed to enable our business to continue to operate even under adverse circumstances, although there can be no assurance that our strategy will be successful under all circumstances.

The majority of our tangible assets consist of assets readily convertible into cash. Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned are stated at fair value and are generally readily marketable in most market conditions. Receivables and payables with brokers, dealers and clearing organizations usually settle within a few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize diversification of funding sources to the extent possible while considering tenor and cost. Our assets are financed by our cash flows from operations, equity capital, and our funding arrangements. The fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are directly related to daily operating activities from our various businesses. One of our most important risk management disciplines is our ability to manage the size and composition of our balance sheet. While our asset base changes due to client activity, market fluctuations and business opportunities, the size and composition of our balance sheet reflect our overall risk tolerance, our ability to access stable funding sources and the amount of equity capital we hold.


Certain market conditions can impact the liquidity of our inventory positions, requiring us to hold larger inventory positions for longer than expected or requiring us to take other actions that may adversely impact our results.


A significant component of our employees’employees' compensation is paid in annual discretionary incentive compensation. The timing of these incentive compensation payments, which generally are made in February, has a significant impact on our cash position and liquidity.


We have not historically paidOur acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, which closed on January 3, 2020, was funded through cash dividendsflows from operations, cash proceeds from the sale of ARI, and our unsecured fixed rate senior notes which were issued on October 15, 2019.

Our dividend policy is intended to return between 30 percent and 50 percent of our common stock. Beginning in 2017, we are initiatingadjusted net income from the previous fiscal year to shareholders. This includes the payment of a quarterly and an annual special cash dividend, payable in the first quarter of each year. Our board of directors determines the declaration and payment of dividends on an annual and quarterly basis, and is free to holderschange our dividend policy at any time.

Our board of directors declared the following dividends on shares of our common stock. stock:
Declaration Date Dividend Per Share
 Record Date Payment Date
February 2, 2017 $0.3125
 February 20, 2017 March 13, 2017
April 27, 2017 $0.3125
 May 26, 2017 June 15, 2017
July 27, 2017 $0.3125
 August 28, 2017 September 15, 2017
October 26, 2017 $0.3125
 November 29, 2017 December 15, 2017
February 1, 2018 (1) $1.6200
 February 26, 2018 March 15, 2018
February 1, 2018 $0.3750
 February 26, 2018 March 15, 2018
April 27, 2018 $0.3750
 May 25, 2018 June 15, 2018
July 27, 2018 $0.3750
 August 24, 2018 September 14, 2018
October 26, 2018 $0.3750
 November 28, 2018 December 14, 2018
February 1, 2019 (2) $1.0100
 February 25, 2019 March 15, 2019
February 1, 2019 $0.3750
 February 25, 2019 March 15, 2019
April 26, 2019 $0.3750
 May 24, 2019 June 14, 2019
July 26, 2019 $0.3750
 August 23, 2019 September 13, 2019
October 30, 2019 $0.3750
 November 22, 2019 December 13, 2019
January 31, 2020 (3) $0.7500
 March 2, 2020 March 13, 2020
January 31, 2020 $0.3750
 March 2, 2020 March 13, 2020
(1)Represents the annual special cash dividend based on fiscal year 2017 results.
(2)Represents the annual special cash dividend based on fiscal year 2018 results.
(3)Represents the annual special cash dividend based on fiscal year 2019 results.

Our board of directors has declared a special cash dividend on our common stock of $0.3125$0.75 per share related to 2019 adjusted net income. This special dividend will be paid on March 13, 20172020, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 20, 2017. Our boardMarch 2, 2020. Including this special cash dividend and the regular quarterly dividends totaling $1.50 per share paid during 2019, we will have returned $2.25 per share, or approximately 33 percent of directors is freeour fiscal year 2019 adjusted net income to change our dividend policy at any time.shareholders.


Effective August 14, 2015,September 30, 2017, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2017. 2019. During 2016, 2019, we repurchased 1,536,226501 shares of our common stock at an average price of $38.89$64.80 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $59.7 million related to this authorization. We have $71.8This authorization expired on September 30, 2019.

On November 15, 2019, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million remaining under this authorization.in common shares. This authorization will be effective from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021.


We also purchase shares of common stock from restricted stock award recipients upon the award vesting or as recipients sell shares to meet their employment tax obligations. During20162019, we purchased 261,685701,217 shares or $11.150.6 million of our common sharesstock for this purpose.these purposes.


Cash Flows


Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 20162019 were $41.4$250.0 million, a decreasean increase of $148.6$199.7 million from December 31, 2015.2018. Operating activities provided $48.8$67.8 million of cash, as non-cash charges were partially offset by an increase in operating assets. Our $13.7 million net loss in 2016 included non-cash charges of $82.9 million related to goodwill impairment and $21.2 million of intangible asset amortization expense. The increase in intangible asset amortization expense wasprimarily due to incremental expense related to our recent acquisitionscash generated from earnings. Our net income of Simmons, River Branch and BMO GKST.$118.2 million in 2019 included a $33.0 million non-cash gain on the sale of ARI. The increase in operating assets primarily relatedwas driven by a $46.2 million increase in our receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. The decrease in operating liabilities was due to a receivable for unsettled trades, reverse repurchase agreements, which are principally used to make delivery on securities sold short, and additional investmentsdecrease in our senior living fund.accrued compensation of $29.3 million resulting from the payment of the Simmons performance award plan in the third quarter of 2019. In 2016,2019, investing activities used $83.7provided $26.7 million, primarily due to proceeds from the sale of cash,ARI. This increase was partially offset by the use of which $72.7$19.7 million related tofor the acquisition of Simmons,Weeden & Co., and $11.0$6.5 million for the purchase of fixed assets. Cash of $111.6$104.7 million was used inprovided through financing activities as we repurchased $70.9issued $175 million of fixed rate senior notes on October 15, 2019. The repurchase of $50.6 million of common stock. In addition, we used excess cashstock and dividend payments of $27.4$35.6 million to reduce amounts due under our short-term financing, primarily related to commercial paper, and also decreased our obligations related to repurchase agreements.partially offset this increase.


Cash and cash equivalents increased $174.0 million to $189.9 million at December 31, 20152018 were $50.4 million, an increase of $16.6 million from December 31, 2014.2017. Operating activities provided $379.5$509.8 million of cash, primarily due to cash generated from earnings as well as a reductionreductions in operating assets, particularlymost notably a $534.4 million decrease in net financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, as we discontinued certain of our strategic trading activities in municipal securities and reduced inventories to navigate the challenging fixed income market we experienced in 2018. Partially offsetting this decline were increases in our receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations related to Pershing, our clearing broker dealer. The decrease in operating liabilities was primarily driven by a decrease in accrued compensation of $60.2 million, the liquidationresult of our municipal bond fund with outside investors, convertible securities inventory, and reverse repurchase agreements, which are principallylower compensation costs in 2018 resulting from decreased revenues. In 2018, investing activities used to make delivery on securities sold short. Investing activities in 2015 used $16.2$15.8 million of cash primarily related to the acquisitions of River Branch and BMO GKST, and the purchase of fixed assets. In 2015, financing activities used $189.0 million of cash as we repurchased $132.9 million of common stock, and experienced a

$106.8 million decrease in noncontrolling interests resulting from the liquidation of our municipal bond fund with outside investors. In October 2015, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement under which we issued unsecured fixed rate senior notes that provided $125.0 million in financing, $75.0 million of which was used to repay our Class B variable rate senior notes that were due in November 2015.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $107.8 million to $15.9 million at December 31, 2014 from December 31, 2013. Operating activities used $50.1 million of cash primarily due to an increase in operating assets, particularly related to our inventory and reverse repurchase agreements, which are principally used to make delivery on securities sold short. Partially offsetting these increases in operating assets were cash received from earnings and increased compensation related accruals. Investing activities in 2014 used $5.4 million of cash primarily related tofor the purchase of fixed assets. Cash of $52.0$476.8 million was used in financing activities as we reduced amounts due under our short-term financing by $240.0 million, through the closure of our prime brokerage arrangement related to commercial paperour strategic trading activities in municipal securities. We also repurchased $70.9 million of our common stock, paid $47.2 million in dividends and repaid our prime broker arrangement, offset$125.0 million fixed rate senior notes in part by increases in repurchase agreements. Additionally, we experienced a $9.0full on the October 9, 2018 maturity date.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $36.6 million decrease in noncontrolling interests due to net fund capital withdrawals and used $10.9$33.8 million at December 31, 2017 from December 31, 2016. Operating activities provided $203.0 million of cash, to repurchase common stock from employees selling shares to meet their tax obligationsas non-cash charges and decreases in operating assets were partially offset by an increase in operating liabilities. Our $59.6 million net loss in 2017 included non-cash charges of $114.4 million related to award vestings.goodwill impairment attributable to our Asset Management segment, $36.4 million for the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets arising from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the lower federal corporate tax rate of 21 percent, and $15.4 million of intangible asset amortization. The conversion to a fully disclosed clearing model in 2017 resulted in a decrease in net operating assets related to the clearing and carrying of customer accounts. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in inventory balances, particularly municipal securities, driven by a trading opportunity in the municipal market identified at the end of the year. The increase in operating liabilities was primarily driven by an increase in accrued compensation of $110.2 million, the result of higher compensation costs in 2017 resulting from increased revenues. Investing activities in 2017 used $8.0 million of cash for the purchase of fixed assets. Cash of $233.1 million was used in financing activities as we reduced amounts due under our short-term financing by $128.9 million, primarily by decreasing our commercial paper funding as our clearing relationship with Pershing provided another source of financing. In addition, we repaid $50.0 million of variable rate senior notes in full on the May 31, 2017 maturity date.


Leverage


The following table presents total assets, adjusted assets, total shareholders’shareholders' equity and tangible shareholders’shareholders' equity with the resulting leverage ratios as of:ratios:
December 31, December 31,December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 20152019 2018
Total assets$2,125,503
 $2,138,518
$1,628,719
 $1,345,269
Deduct: Goodwill and intangible assets(233,452) (248,506)(104,335) (86,139)
Deduct: Right-of-use lease asset(40,030) 
Deduct: Assets from noncontrolling interests(109,179) (88,590)(76,516) (53,558)
Adjusted assets$1,782,872
 $1,801,422
$1,407,838
 $1,205,572
      
Total shareholders' equity$816,266
 $832,820
$806,528
 $730,416
Deduct: Goodwill and intangible assets(233,452) (248,506)(104,335) (86,139)
Deduct: Noncontrolling interests(57,016) (49,161)(75,245) (52,972)
Tangible common shareholders' equity$525,798
 $535,153
$626,948
 $591,305
      
Leverage ratio (1)2.6
 2.6
2.0
 1.8
      
Adjusted leverage ratio (2)3.4
 3.4
2.2
 2.0
(1)Leverage ratio equals total assets divided by total shareholders’shareholders' equity.
(2)Adjusted leverage ratio equals adjusted assets divided by tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity.


Adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity are non-GAAP financial measures. Goodwill and intangible assets are subtracted from total assets and total shareholders’shareholders' equity in determining adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity, respectively, as we believe that goodwill and intangible assets do not constitute operating assets whichthat can be deployed in a liquid manner. The right-of-use lease asset is also subtracted from total assets in determining adjusted assets as it is not an operating asset that can be deployed in a liquid manner. Amounts attributed to noncontrolling interests are subtracted from total assets and total shareholders' equity in determining adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity, respectively, as they represent assets and equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper JaffraySandler Companies. We view the resulting measure of adjusted leverage, also a non-GAAP financial measure, as a more relevant measure of financial risk when comparing financial services companies.


Funding and Capital Resources


The primary goal of our funding activities is to ensure adequate funding over a wide range of market conditions. Given the mix of our business activities, funding requirements are fulfilled through a diversified range of short-term and long-term financing. We attempt to ensure that the tenor of our borrowing liabilities equals or exceeds the expected holding period of the assets being financed. Our ability to support increases in total assets is largely a function of our ability to obtain funding from external sources. Access to these external sources, as well as the cost of that financing, is dependent upon various factors, including market conditions, the general availability of credit and credit ratings. We currently do not have a credit rating, which could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position by increasing our financing costs and limiting access to sources of liquidity that require a credit rating as a condition to providing the funds.


Short-term financing


Our day-to-day funding and liquidity is obtained primarily through the use of our clearing arrangement with Pershing, commercial paper issuance, repurchase agreements,a prime broker agreements,agreement and a bank linesline of credit, and is typically collateralized by our securities inventory. These funding sources are critical to our ability to finance and hold inventory, which is a necessary part of our institutional brokerage business. The majority of our inventory is liquid and is therefore funded by overnight or short-term facilities. Certain of these short-term facilities (i.e., committed line and commercial paper) have been established to mitigate changes in the liquidity of our inventory based on changing market conditions. In the case of our committed line, it is available to us regardless of changes in market liquidity conditions through the end of its term, although there may be limitations on the type of securities available to pledge. Our commercial paper program helps mitigate changes in market liquidity conditions given it is not an overnight facility, but provides funding with a term of 27 to 270 days. Our funding sources are also dependent on the types of inventory that our counterparties are willing to accept as collateral and the number of counterparties available. Funding is generally obtained at rates based upon the federal funds rate or the London Interbank Offer Rate.LIBOR.


Commercial Paper ProgramPershing Clearing ArrangementWe have established an arrangement to obtain financing from Pershing related to the majority of our trading activities. Under our fully disclosed clearing agreement, the majority of our securities inventories and all of our customer activities are held by or cleared through Pershing. Financing under this arrangement is secured primarily by securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under this arrangement. Our clearing arrangement activities are recorded net from trading activity and reported within receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. The funding is at the discretion of Pershing (i.e., uncommitted) and could be denied without a notice period. Our fully disclosed clearing agreement includes a covenant requiring Piper Sandler & Co., our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary, to maintain excess net capital of $120 million. At December 31, 2019, we had $0.8 million of financing outstanding under this arrangement.

Commercial Paper ProgramPiper JaffraySandler & Co., issues secured commercial paper to fund a portion of its securities inventory. This commercial paper is currently issued under threetwo separate programs, CP Series A CP Series II A and CP Series IIIII A, and is secured by different inventory classes, which is reflected in the interest rate paid on the respective program. The programs can issue commercial paper with maturities of 27 to 270 days. CP Series IIIII A includes a covenant that requires Piper JaffraySandler & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $120$100 million. The CP Series A program was retired effective January 2, 2020. The following table provides information about our commercial paper programs at December 31, 2016:2019:
(Dollars in millions) CP Series A CP Series II A CP Series III A CP Series A CP Series II A
Maximum amount that may be issued $300.0
 $150.0
 $125.0
 $300.0
 $200.0
Amount outstanding 67.6
 20.0
 59.4
 
 50.0
          
Weighted average maturity, in days 45
 13
 15
 
 6
Weighted average maturity at issuance, in days 142
 95
 42
 
 32


Prime Broker Arrangements – We have established an overnight financing arrangement with a broker dealer related to our convertible securities inventories. Financing under this arrangement is secured primarily by convertible securities and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available. The funding is at the discretion of the prime broker and could be denied subject to a notice period. This arrangement is reported within receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, net of trading activity. At December 31, 2019, we had $129.2 million of financing outstanding under this prime broker arrangement.

Additionally, we previously established an arrangement to obtain overnight financing by a singlewith another prime broker related to certain strategic trading activities in municipal securities. We completed the liquidation of the municipal securities inventories associated with these strategic trading activities in the third quarter of 2018, and the alternative asset management fund that we previously managed with outside investors. Additionally, we have established a second overnight financing arrangement with another broker dealer related to our convertible securities inventories. Financing under these arrangements is secured primarily by securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under these arrangements. Ourclosed this prime broker financing activities are recorded net of receivables from trading activity. Thearrangement as we no longer needed the funding is at the discretion of the prime brokers and could be denied subject to a notice period. At December 31, 2016, we had $271.8 million of financing outstanding under these prime broker arrangements.source.


Committed LinesLine – We elected to decrease our committed line from $250$175 million to a one-year $200$125 million revolving secured credit facility in 2016.the fourth quarter of 2019. We may use this credit facility in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of our daily operations, and the amount borrowed under the facility varies daily based on our funding needs.operations. Advances under this facility are secured by certain marketable securities. The facility includes a covenant that requires Piper JaffraySandler & Co. to maintain a minimum regulatory net capital of $120$120 million,, and the unpaid principal amount of all advances under the facility will be due on December 16, 2017.11, 2020. This credit facility has been in place since 2008 and we renewed the facility for another one-year term in the fourth quarter of 2016.2019. At December 31, 2016,2019, we had no advances against this line of credit.

Revolving Credit Facility – On December 20, 2019, our parent company, Piper Sandler Companies, entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with U.S. Bank N.A., which created an unsecured $50 million revolving credit facility. The Credit Agreement will terminate on December 20, 2022, unless otherwise terminated by the parties pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, and is subject to a one-year extension exercisable at our option. At December 31, 2019, we had no advances against this credit facility.

The Credit Agreement includes customary events of default and covenants that, among other things, limit our leverage ratio, require Piper Sandler & Co. to maintain a minimum regulatory net capital, require maintenance of a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges, and impose certain limitations on our ability to make acquisitions and make payments on our capital stock. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all covenants.


Uncommitted Lines – We use uncommitted lines in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of our daily operations, and the amount borrowed under our uncommitted lines varies daily based on our funding needs. Our uncommitted secured lines total $185 million with two banks and are dependent on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement, to secure an advance under the line. Collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under these secured lines. We also have an uncommitted unsecured facility with one of these banks. All of these uncommitted lines are discretionary and are not a commitment by the bank to provide an advance under the line. More specifically, these lines are subject to approval by the respective bank each time an advance is requested and advances may be denied, which may be particularly true during times of market stress or market perceptions of our exposures. We manage our relationships with the banks that provide these uncommitted facilities in order to have appropriate levels of funding for our business. At December 31, 2016, we had no advances against these lines of credit.


The following tables present the average balances outstanding for our various short-term funding sources by quarter for 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018:
 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2019 Sept. 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 Mar. 31, 2019
Funding source:       
Pershing clearing arrangement$22.9
 $94.6
 $170.2
 $82.1
Commercial paper50.0
 50.0
 50.0
 50.0
Prime broker arrangements99.7
 68.0
 77.1
 106.4
Total$172.6
 $212.6
 $297.3
 $238.5
 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2018 Sept. 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 Mar. 31, 2018
Funding source:       
Pershing clearing arrangement$79.6
 $3.0
 $90.0
 $47.1
Commercial paper50.0
 50.0
 50.0
 50.0
Prime broker arrangements85.2
 112.7
 218.8
 336.5
Total$214.8
 $165.7
 $358.8
 $433.6
 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2016 Sept. 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 Mar. 31, 2016
Funding source:       
Repurchase agreements$3.5
 $14.8
 $28.9
 $30.5
Commercial paper165.8
 235.8
 279.7
 279.2
Prime broker arrangements225.6
 200.6
 169.2
 159.0
Short-term bank loans5.3
 
 6.4
 0.8
Total$400.2
 $451.2
 $484.2
 $469.5

 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2015 Sept. 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 Mar. 31, 2015
Funding source:       
Repurchase agreements$25.5
 $32.1
 $76.9
 $66.4
Commercial paper277.5
 276.8
 256.3
 245.1
Prime broker arrangements109.4
 139.8
 242.8
 167.1
Short-term bank loans0.3
 0.2
 11.9
 28.4
Total$412.7
 $448.9
 $587.9
 $507.0

The average funding in the fourth quarter of 20162019 decreased to $400.2$172.6 million, compared with $451.2$212.6 million during the third quarter of 2016,2019 and $214.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2018, due to an increase in long-term financing as we used excess cash to reduce commercial paper funding.a result of the new fixed rate senior notes issued during the quarter.


The following table presents the maximum daily funding amount by quarter for 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018:
(Dollars in millions) 2016 2015 2019 2018
First Quarter $576.4
 $949.8
 $362.7
 $613.1
Second Quarter $669.7
 $876.0
 $427.1
 $505.0
Third Quarter $525.6
 $666.1
 $416.0
 $263.5
Fourth Quarter $274.1
 $531.7
 $330.7
 $312.3


Senior Notes


We haveOn October 15, 2019, we entered into variable anda note purchase agreement ("Note Purchase Agreement") under which we issued unsecured fixed rate senior notes with("Notes") in the amount of $175 million. The initial holders of the Notes are certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company ("PIMCO"). The following table presents the outstanding balance by note class:
 Outstanding Balance
 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Class A Notes$50,000
 $50,000
Class C Notes125,000
 125,000
Total senior notes$175,000
 $175,000

On October 8, 2015, we entered into a second amendedNotes consist of two classes, Class A Notes and restated note purchase agreement ("Second AmendedClass B Notes, with principal amounts of $50 million and Restated Note Purchase Agreement") under which we issued $125 million, of fixed rate Class C Notes.respectively. The Class CA Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.064.74 percent payable semi-annually and mature on October 9, 2018.15, 2021. The $50 million of variable rate Class AB Notes issued in 2014 bear interest at aan annual fixed rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.00of 5.20 percent adjusted and payable quarterly and mature on May 31, 2017.October 15, 2023. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually. The unpaid principal amounts of the senior notes are due in full on the respective maturity dates and may not be prepaid.


The Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement includes customary events of default and covenants that, among other things, require usPiper Sandler & Co. to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and minimum regulatory net capital, limit our leverage ratio and require maintenance of a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges. At December 31, 2016,2019, we were in compliance with all covenants.



Contractual Obligations


In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. The following table summarizes the contractual amounts at December 31, 2016,2019, in total and by remaining maturity. Excluded from the table are a number of obligations recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition that generally are short-term in nature, including secured financing transactions, trading liabilities, short-term borrowings and other payables and accrued liabilities. The amounts presented in the table below may not necessarily reflect our actual future cash funding requirements because the actual timing of the future payments made may vary from the stated contractual obligation.


  2018 2020 2022 and    2021 2023 2025 and  
(Dollars in millions)2017  - 2019  - 2021 thereafter Total2020 - 2022 - 2024 thereafter Total
Operating lease obligations$14.6
 $25.5
 $18.3
 $20.0
 $78.4
$17.2
 $24.0
 $14.9
 $10.9
 $67.0
Purchase commitments17.1
 7.1
 
 
 24.2
19.9
 17.4
 7.6
 8.8
 53.7
Investment commitments (1)
 
 
 
 22.8

 
 
 
 71.0
Senior notes50.0
 125.0
 
 
 175.0

 50.0
 125.0
 
 175.0
(1)
The investment commitments have no specified call dates. The timing of capital calls is based on market conditions and investment opportunities. Investment commitments consist of $15.6 million to an affiliated merchant banking fund, and $3.8 million to an affiliated fund, which provides financing to senior living facilities.


Purchase commitments include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase commitments with variable pricing provisions are included in the table based on the minimum contractual amounts. Certain purchase commitments contain termination or renewal provisions. The table reflects the minimum contractual amounts likely to be paid under these agreements assuming the contracts are not terminated.


Capital Requirements


As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"),FINRA, Piper JaffraySandler & Co., our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary, is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. We have elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule which requires that we maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from customer transactions, as this is defined in the rule. FINRA may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances.$1.0 million. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals are subject to certain approvals, notifications and other provisions of the uniform net capital rules. We expect that these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. At December 31, 2016,2019, our net capital under the SEC’sSEC's uniform net capital rule was $191.1$236.9 million, and exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $190.1$235.9 million.


Although we operate with a level of net capital substantially greater than the minimum thresholds established by FINRA and the SEC, a substantial reduction of our capital would curtail many of our Capital Marketscapital markets revenue producing activities.


Our committed short-term credit facility, revolving credit facility and its senorsenior notes with PIMCO include covenants requiring Piper JaffraySandler & Co. to maintain a minimum regulatory net capital of $120 million. CP NotesSecured commercial paper issued under CP Series IIIII A includeincludes a covenant that requires Piper JaffraySandler & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. Our fully disclosed clearing agreement with Pershing also includes a covenant requiring Piper Sandler & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $120 million.


At December 31, 2016,2019, Piper JaffraySandler Ltd. and SCIL,, our broker dealer subsidiariessubsidiary registered in the United Kingdom, wereU.K., was subject to, and werewas in compliance with, the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority pursuant to the Financial Services Act of 2012.


Piper JaffraySandler Hong Kong Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, which is subject to the liquid capital requirements of the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rule promulgated under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. At December 31, 2016,2019, Piper JaffraySandler Hong Kong Limited was in compliance with the liquid capital requirements of the Hong Kong Securities and FuturesTrade Commission.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


In the ordinary course of business we enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements. The following table summarizes the notional contract value of our off-balance sheet arrangements for the periods presented:
Expiration Per Period at December 31, Total Contractual AmountExpiration Per Period at December 31, Total Contractual Amount

     2020 2022   December 31, December 31,
     2023 2025   December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2018 2019 - 2021 - 2023 Later 2016 20152020 2021 2022 - 2024 - 2026 Later 2019 2018
Customer matched-book derivative contracts (1) (2)$40,950
 $
 $34,650
 $42,960
 $165,780
 $3,045,867
 $3,330,207
 $4,392,440
$19,040
 $6,930
 $25,440
 $143,180
 $54,160
 $1,948,590
 $2,197,340
 $2,532,966
Trading securities derivative contracts (2)393,800
 
 
 
 
 29,750
 423,550
 290,600
96,500
 
 
 5,000
 
 9,375
 110,875
 262,275
Credit default swap index contracts (2)
 
 
 7,470
 
 
 7,470
 94,270
Futures and equity option derivative contracts (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,345,037
Investment commitments (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 22,776
 32,819

 
 
 
 
 
 70,953
 77,984
(1)
Consists of interest rate swaps. We have minimal market risk related to these matched-book derivative contracts; however, we do have counterparty risk with one major financial institution, which is mitigated by collateral deposits. In addition, we have a limited number of counterparties (contractual amount of $183.4173.2 million at December 31, 20162019) who are not required to post collateral. The uncollateralized amounts, representing the fair value of the derivative contracts, expose us to the credit risk of these counterparties. At December 31, 20162019, we had $22.719.2 million of credit exposure with these counterparties, including $15.616.2 million of credit exposure with one counterparty.
(2)
We believe the fair value of these derivative contracts is a more relevant measure of the obligations because we believe the notional or contract amount overstates the expected payout. At December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 20152018, the net fair value of these derivative contracts approximated $24.016.3 million and $31.812.5 million, respectively.
(3)The investment commitments have no specified call dates. The timing of capital calls is based on market conditions and investment opportunities.


Derivatives


Derivatives’Derivatives' notional or contract amounts are not reflected as assets or liabilities on our consolidated statements of financial condition. Rather, the fair value of the derivative transactions are reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition as assets or liabilities in financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, as applicable. For a complete discussion of our activities related to derivative products, see Note 5, "Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased,"6 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.


Investment Commitments


We have investments, including those made as part of our merchant banking activities, in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies that provide financing or make investments in private equity companies. We commit capital and/or act as the managing partner of these entities. For a complete discussion of our activities related to these types of entities, see Note 7, "Variable Interest Entities," in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

We have committed capital of $71.0 million to certain entities and these commitments generally have no specified call dates. For additional information on our activities related to these types of entities, see Note 8 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates ("IBORs"), including LIBOR

Central banks and regulators in a number of major jurisdictions (e.g., U.S., U.K., European Union, Switzerland and Japan) have convened working groups to find, and implement the transition to, suitable replacements for IBORs. The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it will not compel panel banks to contribute to LIBOR after 2021. We had $22.8 millionhave a limited number of commitments outstanding at December 31, 2016, ofcontractual agreements which $15.6 million relateuse LIBOR. We do not expect the transition from LIBOR to an affiliated merchant banking fund, and $3.8 million relatea replacement rate to an affiliated fund, which provides financing for senior living facilities.have a significant impact on our operations.



Risk Management


Risk is an inherent part of our business. The principal risks we face in operating our business include: strategic risk, market risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, operational risk, human capital risk, and legal and regulatory risks. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage each of these risks is critical to our financial condition and profitability. We have a formal risk management process to identify, assess and monitor each risk and mitigating controls in accordance with defined policies and procedures. The risk management functions are independent of our business lines. Our management takes an active role in the risk management process, and the results are reported to senior management and the Board of Directors.


The audit committee of the Board of Directors oversees management’smanagement's processes for identifying and evaluating our major risks, and the policies, procedures and practices employed by management to govern its risk assessment and risk management processes. The nominating and governance committee of the Board of Directors oversees the Board of Directors’Directors' committee structures and functions as they relate to the various committees’committees' responsibilities with respect to oversight of our major risk exposures. With respect to these major risk exposures, the audit committee is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures relating to market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, legal and regulatory risk,risks, operational risk (including cybersecurity), and human capital risk relating to misconduct, fraud, and legal and compliance matters. Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures relating to compensation, organizational structure, and succession. Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures related to our corporate strategy. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer meet with the audit committee on a quarterly basis to discuss our market, liquidity, and legal and regulatory risks, and provide updates to the Board of Directors, audit committee, and compensation committee concerning the other major risk exposures on a regular basis.


We use internal committees to assist in governing risk and ensure that our business activities are properly assessed, monitored and managed. Our executive financial risk committees managecommittee manages our market, liquidity and credit risks, and overseerisks; oversees risk management practices related to these risks, including defining acceptable risk tolerances and approving risk management policies.policies; and responds to market changes in a dynamic manner. Membership is comprised of senior leadership, including but not limited to, our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Treasurer, Head of Market and Credit Risk, Head of Public Finance,and Head of Fixed Income Services and Firm Investments and Trading, and Head of Equities.Trading. Other committees that help evaluate and monitor risk include underwriting, leadership team and operating committees. These committees help manage risk by ensuring that business activities are properly managed and within a defined scope of activity. Our valuation committee, comprised of members of senior management and risk management, provide oversight and overall responsibility for the internal control processes and procedures related to fair value measurements. Additionally, our operational risk committees address and monitor risk related to information systems and security, legal, regulatory and compliance matters, and third parties such as vendors and service providers.


With respect to market risk and credit risk, the cornerstone of our risk management process is daily communication among traders, trading department management and senior management concerning our inventory positions, including those associated with our strategic trading activities, and overall risk profile. Our risk management functions supplement this communication process by providing their independent perspectives on our market and credit risk profile on a daily basis. The broader objectives of our risk management functions are to understand the risk profile of each trading area, to consolidate risk monitoring company-wide, to assist in implementing effective hedging strategies, to articulate large trading or position risks to senior management, and to ensure accurate fair values of our financial instruments.


Risk management techniques, processes and strategies may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, and any risk management failures could expose us to material unanticipated losses.


Strategic Risk


Strategic risk represents the risk associated with executive management failing to develop and execute on the appropriate strategic vision which demonstrates a commitment to our culture, leverages our core competencies, appropriately responds to external factors in the marketplace, and is in the best interests of our clients, employees and shareholders.


Our leadership team is responsible for managing our strategic risks. The Board of Directors oversees the leadership team in setting and executing our strategic plan.



Market Risk


Market risk represents the risk of losses, or financial volatility, that may result from the change in value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as a financial intermediary for our clients, to our market-making activities and our strategic trading activities. Market risks are inherent to both cash and derivative financial instruments. The scope of our market risk management policies and procedures includes all market-sensitive financial instruments.


Our different types of market risk include:


Interest Rate Risk — Interest rate risk represents the potential volatility from changes in market interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, changes in the slope of the yield curve, changes in credit spreads, and the rate of prepayments on our interest-earning assets (e.g., inventories) and our funding sources (e.g., short-term financing) which finance these assets. Interest rate risk is managed by selling short U.S. government securities, agency securities, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts. See Note 56 of our accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information on our derivative contracts. Our interest rate hedging strategies may not work in all market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate risk. Also, we establish limits on the notional level of our fixed income securities inventory and manage net positions within those limits.


Equity Price Risk — Equity price risk represents the potential loss in value due to adverse changes in the level or volatility of equity prices. We are exposed to equity price risk through our trading activities primarily in the U.S. market. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our market-making and in our inventory of equity securities by establishing limits on the notional level of our inventory and by managing net position levels within those limits.


Foreign Exchange Risk — Foreign exchange risk represents the potential volatility to earnings or capital arising from movement in foreign exchange rates. A modest portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar can therefore affect the value of non-U.S. dollar net assets, revenues and expenses. A change in the foreign currency rates could create either a foreign currency transaction gain/loss (recorded in our consolidated statements of operations) or a foreign currency translation adjustment (recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) within the shareholders’shareholders' equity section of our consolidated statements of financial condition and other comprehensive income/(loss) within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income).


Value-at-Risk ("VaR")


We use the statistical technique known as VaR to measure, monitor and review the market risk exposures in our trading portfolios. VaR is the potential loss in value of our trading positions, excluding noncontrolling interests, due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily VaR analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed income, equities, convertible bonds, mortgage-backed securities and all associated economic hedges. These positions encompass both customer-related and strategic trading activities. A VaR model provides a common metric for assessing market risk across business lines and products. Changes in VaR between reporting periods are generally due to changes in levels of risk exposure, volatilities and/or correlations among asset classes and individual securities.


We use a Monte Carlo simulation methodology for VaR calculations. We believe this methodology provides VaR results that properly reflect the risk profile of all our instruments, including those that contain optionality, and also accurately models correlation movements among all of our asset classes. In addition, it provides improved tail results as there are no assumptions of distribution, and can provide additional insight for scenario shock analysis.


Model-based VaR derived from simulation has inherent limitations including: reliance on historical data to predict future market risk; VaR calculated using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or offset with hedges within one day; and published VaR results reflect past trading positions while future risk depends on future positions.


The modeling of the market risk characteristics of our trading positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While we believe that these assumptions and approximations are reasonable, different assumptions and approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. When comparing our VaR numbers to those of other firms, it is important to remember that different methodologies, assumptions and approximations could produce significantly different results.



The following table quantifies the model-based VaR simulated for each component of market risk for the periods presented, which are computed using the past 250 days of historical data. When calculating VaR we use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time horizon. This means that, over time, there is a one in 20 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. Shortfalls on a single day can exceed reported VaR by significant amounts. Shortfalls can also accumulate over a longer time horizon, such as a number of consecutive trading days. Therefore, there can be no assurance that actual losses occurring on any given day arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR amounts shown below or that such losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period.
December 31, December 31,December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 20152019 2018
Interest Rate Risk$696
 $608
$428
 $370
Equity Price Risk41
 119
52
 49
Diversification Effect (1)(26) (66)(37) (40)
Total Value-at-Risk$711
 $661
$443
 $379
(1)Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly correlated.


The aggregate VaR as of December 31, 2019 was higher than the reported VaR on December 31, 2018. The increase in VaR was due to our mix of inventory compared to the end of 2018.

We view average VaR over a period of time as more representative of trends in the business than VaR at any single point in time. The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average value-at-riskVaR calculated for each component of market risk during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018.
(Dollars in thousands)High Low AverageHigh Low Average
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016     
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019     
Interest Rate Risk$990
 $251
 $533
$792
 $181
 $432
Equity Price Risk412
 6
 150
69
 42
 54
Diversification Effect (1)    (72)    (41)
Total Value-at-Risk$1,049
 $362
 $611
$808
 $191
 $445
(Dollars in thousands)High Low AverageHigh Low Average
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015     
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018     
Interest Rate Risk$853
 $415
 $582
$1,084
 $268
 $631
Equity Price Risk618
 31
 314
91
 21
 54
Diversification Effect (1)    (133)    (40)
Total Value-at-Risk$1,128
 $487
 $763
$1,101
 $277
 $645
(1)Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly correlated. Because high and low VaR numbers for these risk categories may have occurred on different days, high and low numbers for diversification benefiteffect would not be meaningful.


Trading losses exceeded our one-day VaR on 14eight occasions during 2016.2019.

The aggregate VaR as of December 31, 2016 was higher than the reported VaR on December 31, 2015. The increase in VaR is due to higher volatility and increased inventory levels at the end of the measurement period.


In addition to VaR, we also employ additional measures to monitor and manage market risk exposure including net market position, duration exposure, option sensitivities, and inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset concentration and are used for monitoring limits and exception approvals. In times of market volatility, we also perform ad hoc stress tests and scenario analysis as market conditions dictate. Unlike our VaR, which measures potential losses within a given confidence level, stress scenarios do not have an associated implied probability. Rather, stress testing is used to estimate the potential loss from market moves outside our VaR confidence levels.


Liquidity Risk


Liquidity risk is the risk that we are unable to timely access necessary funding sources in order to operate our business, as well as the risk that we are unable to timely divest securities that we hold in connection with our market-making, sales and trading, and strategic trading activities. We are exposed to liquidity risk in our day-to-day funding activities, by holding potentially illiquid inventory positions and in our role as a remarketing agent for variable rate demand notes.



See the section entitled "Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources" in Part II, Item 7, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in this Form 10-K for information regarding our liquidity and how we manage liquidity risk.

Our inventory positions, including those associated with strategic trading activities, subject us to potential financial losses from the reduction in value of illiquid positions. Market risk can be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Depending on the specific security, the structure of the financial product, and/or overall market conditions, we may be forced to hold a security for substantially longer than we had planned or forced to liquidate into a challenging market if funding becomes unavailable.


Credit Risk


Credit risk refers to the potential for loss due to the default or deterioration in credit quality of a counterparty, customer, borrower or issuer of securities we hold in our trading inventory. The nature and amount of credit risk depends on the type of transaction, the structure and duration of that transaction and the parties involved. Credit risk also results from an obligor's failure to meet the terms of any contract with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed. This may be reflected through issues such as settlement obligations or payment collections.


Our different types of credit risk include:


Credit Spread Risk — Credit spread risk arises from the possibility that changes in credit spreads will affect the value of financial instruments. Credit spreads represent the credit risk premiums required by market participants for a given credit quality (e.g., the additional yield that a debt instrument issued by a AA-rated entity must produce over a risk-free alternative). Changes in credit spreads result from potential changes in an issuer’sissuer's credit rating or the market’smarket's perception of the issuer’sissuer's credit worthiness. We are exposed to credit spread risk with the debt instruments held in our trading inventory, including those held for strategic trading activities. We enter into transactions to hedge our exposure to credit spread risk through the use of derivatives and certain other financial instruments. These hedging strategies may not work in all market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating credit spread risk.


Deterioration/Default Risk — Deterioration/default risk represents the risk due to an issuer, counterparty or borrower failing to fulfill its obligations. We are exposed to deterioration/default risk in our role as a trading counterparty to dealers and customers, as a holder of securities, and as a member of exchanges and clearing organizations.exchanges. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and/or issuer of the security. We mitigate this risk by establishing and monitoring individual and aggregate position limits for each counterparty relative to potential levels of activity, holding and marking to market collateral on certain transactions and conducting business through clearing organizations, which guarantee performance.transactions. Our risk management functions also evaluate the potential risk associated with institutional counterparties with whom we hold repurchase and resale agreement facilities, stock borrow or loan facilities, derivatives, TBAs and other documented institutional counterparty agreements that may give rise to credit exposure.


Collections Risk — Collections risk arises from ineffective management and monitoring of collecting outstanding debts and obligations, including those related to our customer trading activities and margin lending. Our client activities involve the execution, settlement and financing of various transactions. Client activities are transacted on a delivery versus payment, cash or margin basis. Our credit exposure to institutional client business is mitigated by the use of industry-standard delivery versus payment through depositories and clearing banks. Credit exposure associated with our customer margin accounts in the U.S. is monitored daily. Our risk management functions have credit risk policies establishing appropriate credit limits and collateralization thresholds for our customers utilizing margin lending.


Concentration Risk — Concentration risk is the risk due to concentrated exposure to a particular product; individual issuer, borrower or counterparty; financial instrument; or geographic area. We are subject to concentration risk if we hold large individual securities positions, execute large transactions with individual counterparties or groups of related counterparties, or make substantial underwriting commitments. Concentration risk can occur by industry, geographic area or type of client. Securities purchased under agreements to resell consist primarily of securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. The counterparties to these agreements typically are primary dealers of U.S. government securities and major financial institutions. Inventory and investment positions taken and commitments made, including underwritings, may result in exposure to individual issuers and businesses. Potential concentration risk is carefully monitored through review of counterparties and borrowers and is managed through the use of policies and limits established by senior management.



We have concentrated counterparty credit exposure with five non-publicly rated entities totaling $22.719.2 million at December 31, 20162019. This counterparty credit exposure is part of our matched-book derivative program related to our public finance business, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps. One derivative counterparty represents 68.7represented 84.2 percent, or $15.616.2 million, of this exposure. Credit exposure associated with our derivative counterparties is driven by uncollateralized market movements in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts and is monitored regularly by our financial risk committee. We attempt to minimize the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by senior management.


Operational Risk


Operational risk is the risk of loss, or damage to our reputation, resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people and systems or from external events. We rely on the ability of our employees and our systems, both internal and at computer centers operated by third parties, to process a large number of transactions. Our systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of our systems or improper action by our employees or third party vendors, we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. We also face the risk of operational failure or termination of our relationship with any of the exchanges, clearing houses, fully disclosed clearing firms, or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities transactions. Any such failure or termination could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions and manage our exposure to risk.


Our operations rely on secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our internal and outsourced computer systems and networks. Our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code, internal misconduct or inadvertent errors and other events that could have an information security impact. The occurrence of one or more of these events, which we have experienced, could jeopardize our or our clients' or counterparties' confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our clients', our counterparties' or third parties' operations. We take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant.


In order to mitigate and control operational risk, we have developed and continue to enhance policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. We also have business continuity plans in place that we believe will cover critical processes on a company-wide basis, and redundancies are built into our systems as we have deemed appropriate. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational policies and procedures are being followed and that our various businesses are operating within established corporate policies and limits.


In 2017, we will be migrating toWe operate under a fully disclosed clearing model for all of our currently self clearing operations. In a fully disclosed clearing model, we act as an introducing broker for client transactions and rely on Pershing, our clearing broker dealer, to facilitate clearance and settlement of our clients' securities transactions. The migration process introduces unique risks thatclearing services provided by Pershing are critical to our business operations, and similar to other services performed by third party vendors, any failure by Pershing with respect to the services we rely upon Pershing to provide could cause disruptions infinancial loss, significantly disrupt our business, or create other unexpected capital charges or losses. We have preventative measures in place, including a project governance committee comprised of members of senior management, as well as senior management atdamage our third party partner. In order to mitigatereputation, and control operational risk inherent in the migration, we have developed procedures specific to the project implementation process, including parallel system operations, mock conversion testing, and ongoing monitoring and reporting to members of the project governance committee. We also have theadversely affect our ability to obtain additional methods of financing from existing creditors in the event unknown capital charges arise.

serve our clients and manage our exposure to risk.
Human Capital Risk


Our business is a human capital business and our success is dependent upon the skills, expertise and performance of our employees. Human capital risks represent the risks posed if we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals who are motivated to serve the best interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company. Attracting and retaining employees depends, among other things, on our company's culture, management, work environment, geographic locations and compensation. There are risks associated with the proper recruitment, development and rewards of our employees to ensure quality performance and retention.



Legal and Regulatory Risk


Legal and regulatory risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and loss to our reputation we may suffer as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards and codes of conduct applicable to our business activities. We are generally subject to extensive regulation in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. We have established procedures that are designed to ensure compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, such as public company reporting obligations, regulatory net capital requirements, sales and trading practices, potential conflicts of interest, use and safekeeping of customer funds and securities, anti-money laundering, privacy and recordkeeping. We have also established procedures that are designed to require that our policies relating to ethics and business conduct are followed. The legal and regulatory focus on the financial services industry presents a continuing business challenge for us.


Our business also subjects us to the complex income tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we have business operations, and these tax laws may be subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining the provision for income taxes.


Effects of Inflation


Because our assets are liquid and generally short-term in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as employee compensation, office space leasing costs and communications charges, which may not be readily recoverable in the price of services we offer to our clients. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.


ITEM 7A.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.


The information under the caption "Risk Management" in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K entitled, "Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," is incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.


INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Consolidated Financial Statements:  
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements:  
Note 1 
Note 2 
Note 3 
Note 4 
Note 5
Note 6 
Note 6
Note 7 
Note 8
Note 9 
Note 9
Note 10
Note 11
Note 12
Note 13
Note 14
Note 15
Note 16
Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees
Note 17 
Note 1118
Note 19 
Note 1220
Note 13 
Note 1421 
Note 1522
Note 16
Note 17
Contingencies, CommitmentsRevenues and Guarantees
Note 18
Note 19
Note 20
Note 21 
Note 2223
Note 24
Note 25
Note 26 
Note 23 
Note 24
Note 25
Note 26



MANAGEMENT’S
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.


Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on its assessment and those criteria, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2019.


Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of Piper JaffraySandler Companies included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2019. Their report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Piper Jaffray Companies’Sandler Companies' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, is included herein.




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TheTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Piper JaffraySandler Companies


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Piper JaffraySandler Companies’ (the Company)Company, formerly known as Piper Jaffray Companies) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Piper Jaffray Companies’In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes, and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Piper Jaffray Companies maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2016 consolidated financial statements of Piper Jaffray Companies and our report dated February 24, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 201728, 2020



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TheTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Piper JaffraySandler Companies


Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Piper JaffraySandler Companies (the Company)Company, formerly known as Piper Jaffray Companies) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion,Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat was communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in all material respects,any way our opinion on the consolidated financial position of Piper Jaffray Companies at December 31, 2016statements, taken as a whole, and 2015, andwe are not, by communicating the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each ofcritical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the three years incritical audit matter or on the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.account or disclosures to which it relates.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Piper Jaffray Companies’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Valuation of Investments at Fair Value
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2019, the fair value of the Company’s investments categorized as Level III of the fair value hierarchy totaled $132.3 million, primarily consisting of merchant banking investments in private companies (“merchant banking investments”) that do not have readily determinable fair values. These investments are held in consolidated funds, which include $75.2 million of noncontrolling interests attributable to unrelated third party ownership. As described in Notes 2 and 7 of the consolidated financial statements, management determines the fair values of merchant banking investments internally using the best information available. These investments are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, rounds of financing, third party transactions and market-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”)) and changes in market outlook, among other factors.
Auditing the fair value of the Company’s merchant banking investments was complex, as the inputs and assumptions used by the Company are highly judgmental and could have a significant effect on the fair value measurements of such investments.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s merchant banking investment valuation process. This included controls over management’s assessment of the valuation methodologies, the inputs and assumptions used in determining fair value measurements, and the valuation committee review of merchant banking investment valuations on a quarterly basis.
To test the valuation of the Company’s merchant banking investments, our procedures included, among others, involving internal valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the Company’s valuation methodologies, testing the significant inputs and assumptions used by the Company in determining the fair values, and testing the mathematical accuracy of the Company’s valuation calculations. For example, we agreed model inputs to source information including capital structure, investee-provided financial information or projections, and publicly-available information on comparable transactions (e.g., transaction multiples). We assessed the issuer’s financial projections by comparing them to historical performance, obtaining an understanding of key events impacting the issuer and performing sensitivity analyses as needed to evaluate the impact to fair value that would result from changes in these projections. To the extent available, we evaluated subsequent events and other information and considered whether it corroborated or contradicted the Company’s year-end valuations.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2003.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 201728, 2020




Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition




 December 31, December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)2019 2018
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$250,018
 $50,364
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations283,108
 235,278
    
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned434,088
 479,795
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral205,674
 147,427
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned639,762
 627,222
    
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $65,991 and $58,927, respectively)29,850
 32,300
Goodwill87,649
 81,855
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $40,864 and $36,566, respectively)16,686
 4,284
Investments158,141
 151,886
Net deferred income tax assets68,035
 72,996
Right-of-use lease asset40,030
 
Other assets55,440
 46,443
Assets held for sale
 42,641
Total assets$1,628,719
 $1,345,269
    
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity   
Short-term financing$49,978
 $49,953
Senior notes175,000
 
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations7,514
 8,657
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased185,425
 177,427
Accrued compensation300,527
 323,588
Accrued lease liability57,169
 
Other liabilities and accrued expenses46,578
 45,016
Liabilities held for sale
 10,212
Total liabilities822,191
 614,853
    
Shareholders' equity:   
Common stock, $0.01 par value:   
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018;   
Shares issued: 19,526,533 at December 31, 2019 and 19,518,044 at December 31, 2018;   
Shares outstanding: 13,717,315 at December 31, 2019 and 12,995,397 at December 31, 2018195
 195
Additional paid-in capital757,669
 796,363
Retained earnings258,669
 182,552
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 5,809,218 shares at December 31, 2019 and 6,522,647 shares at December 31, 2018(284,378) (300,268)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(872) (1,398)
Total common shareholders' equity731,283
 677,444
    
Noncontrolling interests75,245
 52,972
Total shareholders' equity806,528
 730,416
    
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$1,628,719
 $1,345,269

 December 31, December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)2016 2015
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$41,359
 $189,910
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes29,015
 81,022
Receivables:   
Customers31,917
 41,167
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations212,730
 147,949
Securities purchased under agreements to resell159,697
 136,983
    
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned464,610
 283,579
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral594,361
 707,355
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned1,058,971
 990,934
    
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $58,308 and $51,874, respectively)25,343
 18,984
Goodwill196,218
 217,976
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $70,017 and $48,803, respectively)37,234
 30,530
Investments168,057
 165,398
Other assets164,962
 117,665
Total assets$2,125,503
 $2,138,518
    
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   
Short-term financing$418,832
 $446,190
Senior notes175,000
 175,000
Payables:   
Customers29,352
 37,364
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations40,842
 48,131
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase15,046
 45,319
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased299,357
 239,155
Accrued compensation288,255
 251,638
Other liabilities and accrued expenses42,553
 62,901
Total liabilities1,309,237
 1,305,698
    
Shareholders’ equity:   
Common stock, $0.01 par value:   
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015;   
Shares issued: 19,535,307 at December 31, 2016 and 19,510,858 at December 31, 2015;   
Shares outstanding: 12,391,970 at December 31, 2016 and 13,311,016 at December 31, 2015195
 195
Additional paid-in capital788,927
 752,066
Retained earnings257,188
 279,140
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 7,143,337 at December 31, 2016 and 6,199,842 shares at December 31, 2015(284,461) (247,553)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,599) (189)
Total common shareholders’ equity759,250
 783,659
    
Noncontrolling interests57,016
 49,161
Total shareholders’ equity816,266
 832,820
    
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$2,125,503
 $2,138,518


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations



 Year Ended December 31, 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017 
       
Revenues:      
Investment banking$629,392
 $588,978
 $633,837
 
Institutional brokerage167,891
 124,738
 154,712
 
Interest26,741
 32,749
 31,954
 
Investment income22,275
 11,039
 23,386
 
       
Total revenues846,299
 757,504
 843,889
 
       
Interest expense11,733
 16,551
 20,268
 
       
Net revenues834,566
 740,953
 823,621
 
       
Non-interest expenses:      
Compensation and benefits516,090
 488,487
 589,637
 
Outside services36,184
 36,528
 33,981
 
Occupancy and equipment36,795
 34,194
 31,943
 
Communications30,760
 28,656
 26,430
 
Marketing and business development28,780
 26,936
 28,673
 
Deal-related expenses25,823
 25,120
 
 
Trade execution and clearance10,186
 8,014
 8,166
 
Restructuring and integration costs14,321
 3,498
 
 
Intangible asset amortization4,298
 4,858
 10,178
 
Back office conversion costs
 
 3,927
 
Other operating expenses12,350
 12,173
 11,370
 
       
Total non-interest expenses715,587
 668,464
 744,305
 
       
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense118,979
 72,489
 79,316
 
       
Income tax expense24,577
 18,046
 53,808
 
       
Income from continuing operations94,402
 54,443
 25,508
 
       
Discontinued operations:      
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax23,772
 1,387
 (85,060) 
       
Net income/(loss)118,174
 55,830
 (59,552) 
       
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests6,463
 (1,206) 2,387
 
       
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939) 
       
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies' common shareholders$107,200
 $49,993
 $(64,875)
(1) 
       
Continued on next page


Piper Sandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations – Continued

 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014
Revenues:     
Investment banking$490,340
 $414,118
 $369,811
Institutional brokerage161,186
 154,889
 156,809
Asset management60,672
 75,017
 85,062
Interest33,074
 41,557
 48,716
Investment income24,602
 10,736
 12,813
      
Total revenues769,874
 696,317
 673,211
      
Interest expense22,525
 23,399
 25,073
      
Net revenues747,349
 672,918
 648,138
      
Non-interest expenses:     
Compensation and benefits510,612
 421,733
 394,510
Outside services39,289
 36,218
 37,055
Occupancy and equipment34,813
 28,301
 28,231
Communications29,626
 23,762
 22,732
Marketing and business development30,404
 29,990
 27,260
Trade execution and clearance7,651
 7,794
 7,621
Restructuring and integration costs10,206
 10,652
 
Goodwill impairment82,900
 
 
Intangible asset amortization expense21,214
 7,662
 9,272
Back office conversion costs561
 
 
Other operating expenses10,947
 20,383
 11,146
      
Total non-interest expenses778,223
 586,495
 537,827
      
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)(30,874) 86,423
 110,311
      
Income tax expense/(benefit)(17,128) 27,941
 35,986
      
Net income/(loss)(13,746) 58,482
 74,325
      
Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests8,206
 6,407
 11,153
      
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
      
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’ common shareholders$(21,952)
(1) 
$48,060
 $58,141
      
Earnings/(loss) per common share     
Basic$(1.73) $3.34
 $3.88
Diluted$(1.73)
(2) 
$3.34
 $3.87
      
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     
Basic12,674
 14,368
 14,971
Diluted12,779
(2) 
14,389
 15,025

 Year Ended December 31, 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017 
       
Amounts applicable to Piper Sandler Companies      
Net income from continuing operations$87,939
 $55,649
 $23,121
 
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations23,772
 1,387
 (85,060) 
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939) 
       
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share      
Income from continuing operations$6.21
 $3.68
 $1.57
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations1.69
 0.09
 (6.64) 
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share$7.90
 $3.78
 $(5.07) 
       
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share      
Income from continuing operations$6.05
 $3.63
 $1.57
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations1.65
 0.09
 (6.55) 
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share$7.69
 $3.72
 $(4.99)
(2) 
       
Dividends declared per common share$2.51
 $3.12
 $1.25
 
       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      
Basic13,555
 13,234
 12,807
 
Diluted13,937
 13,425
 12,978
(2) 

(1)No allocation of undistributed income was made due to loss position. See Note 21.
(2)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred.
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income


Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Net income/(loss)$(13,746) $58,482
 $74,325
$118,174
 $55,830
 $(59,552)
          
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:     
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:     
Foreign currency translation adjustment(2,410) (566) (519)526
 (119) 1,320


    
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax(2,410) (566) (519)
          
Comprehensive income/(loss)(16,156) 57,916
 73,806
118,700
 55,711
 (58,232)
          
Comprehensive income applicable to noncontrolling interests8,206
 6,407
 11,153
Comprehensive income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests6,463
 (1,206) 2,387
          
Comprehensive income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(24,362) $51,509
 $62,653
Comprehensive income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$112,237
 $56,917
 $(60,619)


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity




            Accumulated Total    
  Common   Additional     Other Common   Total
(Amounts in thousands, Shares Common Paid-In Retained Treasury Comprehensive Shareholders' Noncontrolling Shareholders'
 except share amounts) Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Stock Income/(Loss) Equity Interests Equity
                   
Balance at December 31, 2013 14,383,418
 $195
 $740,321
 $163,893
 $(170,629) $896
 $734,676
 $147,396
 $882,072
                   
Net income 
 
 
 63,172
 
 
 63,172
 11,153
 74,325
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock 
 
 23,649
 
 
 
 23,649
 
 23,649
Issuance of treasury shares for options exercised 137,864
 
 834
 
 4,618
 
 5,452
 
 5,452
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings 892,385
 
 (30,295) 
 30,295
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding (256,055) 
 
 
 (10,854) 
 (10,854) 
 (10,854)
Issuance of treasury shares for 401k match 103,598
 
 726
 
 3,430
 
 4,156
 
 4,156
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation 4,210
 
 180
 
 
 
 180
 
 180
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (519) (519) 
 (519)
Fund capital withdrawals, net 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,001) (9,001)
Balance at December 31, 2014 15,265,420

$195
 $735,415
 $227,065
 $(143,140) $377
 $819,912
 $149,548
 $969,460
                   
Net income 
 
 
 52,075
 
 
 52,075
 6,407
 58,482
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock 
 
 43,237
 
 
 
 43,237
 
 43,237
Repurchase of common stock through share repurchase program (2,459,400) 
 
 
 (118,464) 
 (118,464) 
 (118,464)
Issuance of treasury shares for options exercised 50,671
 
 96
 
 1,760
 
 1,856
 
 1,856
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings 734,080
 
 (26,752) 
 26,752
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding (281,180) 
 
 
 (14,461) 
 (14,461) 
 (14,461)
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation 1,425
 
 70
 
 
 
 70
 
 70
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (566) (566) 
 (566)
Fund capital withdrawals, net 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (106,794) (106,794)
Balance at December 31, 2015 13,311,016
 $195
 $752,066
 $279,140
 $(247,553) $(189) $783,659
 $49,161
 $832,820
                   
Continued on next page
Table of Contents
            Accumulated Total    
  Common   Additional     Other Common   Total
(Amounts in thousands, Shares Common Paid-In Retained Treasury Comprehensive Shareholders' Noncontrolling Shareholders'
 except share amounts) Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Stock Loss Equity Interests Equity
                   
Balance at December 31, 2016 12,391,970
 $195
 $788,927
 $257,188
 $(284,461) $(2,599) $759,250
 $57,016
 $816,266
                   
Net income/(loss) 
 
 
 (61,939) 
 
 (61,939) 2,387
 (59,552)
Dividends 
 
 
 (18,979) 
 
 (18,979) 
 (18,979)
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock 
 
 37,250
 
 
 
 37,250
 
 37,250
Repurchase of common stock through share repurchase program (36,936) 
 
 
 (2,498) 
 (2,498) 
 (2,498)
Issuance of treasury shares for options exercised 26,149
 
 662
 
 1,041
 
 1,703
 
 1,703
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings 841,178
 
 (35,077) 
 35,077
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock from employees (314,542) 
 
 
 (22,983) 
 (22,983) 
 (22,983)
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation 3,330
 
 208
 
 
 
 208
 
 208
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 1,320
 1,320
 
 1,320
Fund capital distributions, net 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (11,500) (11,500)
Balance at December 31, 2017 12,911,149

$195
 $791,970
 $176,270
 $(273,824) $(1,279) $693,332
 $47,903
 $741,235
                   
Net income/(loss) 
 
 
 57,036
 
 
 57,036
 (1,206) 55,830
Dividends 
 
 
 (47,157) 
 
 (47,157) 
 (47,157)
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock 
 
 48,448
 
 
 
 48,448
 
 48,448
Repurchase of common stock through share repurchase program (681,233) 
 
 
 (47,142) 
 (47,142) 
 (47,142)
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings 1,040,015
 
 (44,459) 
 44,459
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock from employees (279,664) 
 
 
 (23,761) 
 (23,761) 
 (23,761)
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation 5,130
 
 404
 
 
 
 404
 
 404
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (119) (119) 
 (119)
Cumulative effect upon adoption of new accounting standard, net of tax (1) 
 
 
 (3,597) 
 
 (3,597) 
 (3,597)
Fund capital contributions, net 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6,275
 6,275
Balance at December 31, 2018 12,995,397
 $195
 $796,363
 $182,552
 $(300,268) $(1,398) $677,444
 $52,972
 $730,416
                   
Continued on next page

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity – Continued


           Accumulated Total               Accumulated Total    
 Common   Additional     Other Common   Total Common   Additional     Other Common   Total
(Amounts in thousands, Shares Common Paid-In Retained Treasury Comprehensive Shareholders' Noncontrolling Shareholders' Shares Common Paid-In Retained Treasury Comprehensive Shareholders' Noncontrolling Shareholders'
except share amounts) Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Stock Income/(Loss) Equity Interests Equity Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Stock Loss Equity Interests Equity
                                    
Net income/(loss) 
 $
 $
 $(21,952) $
 $
 $(21,952) $8,206
 $(13,746)
Net income 
 $
 $
 $111,711
 $
 $
 $111,711
 $6,463
 $118,174
Dividends 
 
 
 (35,594) 
 
 (35,594) 
 (35,594)
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock 
 
 65,311
 
 
 
 65,311
 
 65,311
 
 
 27,137
 
 
 
 27,137
 
 27,137
Repurchase of common stock through share repurchase program (1,536,226) 
 
 
 (59,739) 
 (59,739) 
 (59,739) (501) 
 
 
 (32) 
 (32) 
 (32)
Issuance of treasury shares for options exercised 104,175
 
 411
 
 4,146
 
 4,557
 
 4,557
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings 750,241
 
 (29,805) 
 29,805
 
 
 
 
 1,415,147
 
 (66,474) 
 66,474
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding (261,685) 
 
 
 (11,120) 
 (11,120) 
 (11,120)
Repurchase of common stock from employees (701,217) 
 
 
 (50,552) 
 (50,552) 
 (50,552)
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation 24,449
 
 944
 
 
 
 944
 
 944
 8,489
 
 643
 
 
 
 643
 
 643
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (2,410) (2,410) 
 (2,410)
Deconsolidation of investment partnerships (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,415) (9,415)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 526
 526
 
 526
Fund capital contributions, net 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9,064
 9,064
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 15,810
 15,810
Balance at December 31, 2016 12,391,970
 $195
 $788,927
 $257,188
 $(284,461) $(2,599) $759,250
 $57,016
 $816,266
Balance at December 31, 2019 13,717,315
 $195
 $757,669
 $258,669
 $(284,378) $(872) $731,283
 $75,245
 $806,528

(1)The Company deconsolidated certain investment partnershipsCumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2015-02. See Note 3 for further discussion.2014-09, as amended.


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Operating Activities:     
Net income/(loss)$118,174
 $55,830
 $(59,552)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets9,360
 8,358
 7,252
Deferred income taxes11,323
 (652) (3,372)
Gain on sale of Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"), net of tax(33,026) 
 
Stock-based compensation32,003
 44,285
 39,831
Goodwill impairment
 
 114,363
Amortization of intangible assets9,763
 10,460
 15,400
Amortization of forgivable loans4,639
 5,138
 6,740
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets:     
Receivables:     
Customers
 
 31,917
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations(46,207) (89,884) 67,336
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 
 159,697
Net financial instruments and other inventory positions owned(4,542) 534,355
 (224,536)
Investments(6,255) 24,109
 (8,418)
Other assets117
 (3,758) 3,937
Increase/(decrease) in operating liabilities:     
Payables:     
Customers
 
 (29,352)
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations(1,143) (10,735) (21,450)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 
 (15,046)
Accrued compensation(29,277) (60,191) 110,190
Other liabilities and accrued expenses(10,117) (7,915) 6,650
Decrease in assets held for sale20,901
 1,882
 2,690
Decrease in liabilities held for sale(7,915) (1,487) (1,276)
      
Net cash provided by operating activities67,798
 509,795
 203,001
      
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(19,674) 
 
Proceeds from sale of ARI52,881
 
 
Purchases of fixed assets, net(6,516) (15,804) (7,994)
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities26,691
 (15,804) (7,994)
      
Continued on next page
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Operating Activities:     
Net income/(loss)$(13,746) $58,482
 $74,325
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets6,410
 5,058
 5,269
Deferred income taxes(31,023) (20,959) (10,843)
Stock-based and deferred compensation55,977
 48,754
 28,764
Goodwill impairment82,900
 
 
Amortization of intangible assets21,214
 7,662
 9,272
Amortization of forgivable loans8,785
 6,377
 5,316
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes52,007
 (56,011) 18,001
Receivables:     
Customers9,272
 (31,509) 1,975
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations(64,781) 13,060
 (33,896)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(24,591) 171,182
 (140,290)
Net financial instruments and other inventory positions owned(7,835) 126,458
 (27,042)
Investments(10,881) (38,558) (14,797)
Other assets(20,992) 3,602
 3,785
Increase/(decrease) in operating liabilities:     
Payables:     
Customers(8,012) 24,036
 (19,781)
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations(7,289) 22,567
 (2,158)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(1,127) 18,050
 
Accrued compensation30,396
 2,178
 67,247
Other liabilities and accrued expenses(27,902) 19,095
 (15,216)
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities48,782
 379,524
 (50,069)
      
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(72,709) (11,739) 
Repayment of note receivable
 1,500
 2,000
Purchases of fixed assets, net(11,017) (5,914) (7,387)
      
Net cash used in investing activities(83,726) (16,153) (5,387)
      
Continued on next page


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Continued


 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Financing Activities:     
Increase/(decrease) in short-term financing$25
 $(239,984) $(128,895)
Issuance of senior notes175,000
 
 
Repayment of senior notes
 (125,000) (50,000)
Payment of cash dividend(35,594) (47,157) (18,947)
Increase/(decrease) in noncontrolling interests15,810
 6,275
 (11,500)
Repurchase of common stock(50,584) (70,903) (25,481)
Proceeds from stock option exercises
 
 1,703
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities104,657
 (476,769) (233,120)
      
Currency adjustment:     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash508
 (651) 1,532
      
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents199,654
 16,571
 (36,581)
      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year50,364
 33,793
 70,374
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$250,018
 $50,364
 $33,793
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest$12,038
 $17,129
 $19,917
Income taxes$9,581
 $17,134
 $31,895

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Financing Activities:     
Increase/(decrease) in short-term financing$(27,358) $68,423
 $(136,944)
Issuance of senior notes
 125,000
 50,000
Repayment of senior notes
 (75,000) (50,000)
Increase/(decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase(27,269) (75,377) 98,249
Increase/(decrease) in noncontrolling interests9,064
 (106,794) (9,001)
Repurchase of common stock(70,859) (132,925) (10,854)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation304
 5,858
 1,081
Proceeds from stock option exercises4,557
 1,856
 5,452
      
Net cash used in financing activities(111,561) (188,959) (52,017)
      
Currency adjustment:     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(2,046) (369) (343)
      
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(148,551) 174,043
 (107,816)
      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year189,910
 15,867
 123,683
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$41,359
 $189,910
 $15,867
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information –     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest$23,171
 $24,668
 $25,345
Income taxes$27,298
 $31,950
 $58,599
      
Non-cash investing activities –     
Issuance of common stock related to the acquisition of Simmons & Company International:     
25,525 shares for the year ended December 31, 2016$1,074
 $
 $
      
Non-cash financing activities –     
Issuance of common stock for retirement plan obligations:     
103,598 shares for the year ended December 31, 2014$
 $
 $4,156
      
Issuance of restricted common stock for annual equity award:     
843,889 shares, 550,650 shares and 402,074 shares for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively$35,089
 $30,429
 $16,131


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents
Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




Note 1Organization and Basis of Presentation


Organization


As described in Note 26, Piper Jaffray Companies completed the acquisition of SOP Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries, including Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. (collectively, "Sandler O'Neill") on January 3, 2020. Upon completion of the acquisition, Piper Jaffray Companies was renamed Piper Sandler Companies. Certain of its subsidiaries were also renamed. The financial statements presented in this report cover periods that ended prior to the completion of the acquisition, and therefore only include the results of Piper Jaffray Companies. Sandler O'Neill's results of operations will be included in the consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition.

Piper Sandler Companies is the parent company of Piper JaffraySandler & Co. ("Piper Jaffray"Sandler"), a securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper JaffraySandler Ltd., a firm providing securities brokerage and mergers and acquisitions services in Europe headquarteredEurope; Piper Sandler Finance LLC, which facilitates corporate debt underwriting in London, England; Simmons & Company International Limited ("SCIL"), a firm providing mergers and acquisitions services to the energy industry headquartered in Aberdeen, Scotland; Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"), which provides asset management services to separately managed accounts, closed-end and open-end funds and partnerships;conjunction with affiliated credit vehicles; Piper JaffraySandler Investment Group Inc., and PSC Capital Management LLC, which consistsconsist of entities providing alternative asset management services; Piper JaffraySandler Financial Products Inc., and Piper JaffraySandler Financial Products II Inc. and Piper Jaffray Financial Products III Inc., entities that facilitate derivative transactions; and other immaterial subsidiaries.

Piper JaffraySandler Companies and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") operate in two1 reporting segments:segment providing investment banking and institutional securities services (collectively, "Capital Markets"). The Company's Capital Markets and Asset Management. A summary of the activities of each of the Company’s business segments is as follows:

Capital Markets

The Capital Markets segment provides investment banking services and institutional sales, trading and research services. Investment banking services include financial advisory services, management of and participation in underwritings financial advisory services and public finance activities. Revenues are generated through the receipt of advisory and financing fees. Institutional sales, trading and research services focus on the trading of equity and fixed income products with institutions, government and non-profit entities. Revenues are generated through commissions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income institutional sales activities, net interest revenues on trading securities held in inventory, and profits and losses from trading these securities. Also, the Company generates revenue through strategic trading and investing activities, which focus on investments in municipal bonds mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government agency securities, and merchant banking activities involving equity or debt investments in late stage private companies. The Company has created alternative asset management funds in merchant banking, energy and senior living in order to invest firm capital and to manage capital from outside investors. The Company receives management and performance fees for managing these funds.


Asset Management

TheAs discussed in Note 4, Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI") was sold in the third quarter of 2019. ARI's results were previously reported in the Company's Asset Management segment, provideswhich provided traditional asset management services with product offerings in equity securities and master limited partnerships to institutions and individuals. Revenues are generated in the form of management and performance fees. Revenues are also generated through investments in the partnerships and funds that the Company manages.equity securities.


Basis of Presentation


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and include the accounts of Piper JaffraySandler Companies, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interests represent equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper JaffraySandler Companies. Noncontrolling interests include the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in the Company's alternative asset management funds. All material intercompany balances have been eliminated.


The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates and assumptions are based on the best information available, actual results could differ from those estimates.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Principles of Consolidation


The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. The Company determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE") or a voting interest entity.


VIEs are entities in which (i) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to enable the entity to finance its activities independently or (ii) the at-risk equity holders do not have the normal characteristics of a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has one or more variable interests that have both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’sVIE's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIE.


Voting interest entities lack one or more of the characteristics of a VIE. The usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest for a corporation or a majority of kick-out or participating rights for a limited partnership.


When the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in an entity but exerts significant influence over the entity’sentity's operating and financial policies, (generally defined as owning a voting or economic interest of between 20 percent to 50 percent), the Company's investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. If the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in, or exert significant influence over, an entity, the Company accounts for its investment at fair value, if the fair value option was elected, or at cost.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less at the date of origination.

In accordance with Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Piper Jaffray, as a registered broker dealer carrying customer accounts, is subject to requirements related to maintaining cash or qualified securities in a segregated reserve account for the exclusive benefit of its customers.


Customer Transactions

Customer securities transactions are recorded on a settlement date basis, while the related revenues and expenses are recorded on a trade-date basis. Customer receivables and payables include amounts related to both cash and margin transactions. Securities owned by customers, including those that collateralize margin or other similar transactions, are not reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations

Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations include receivables arising from unsettled securities transactions, deposits paid for securities borrowed, receivables from clearing organizations, deposits with clearing organizations and amounts receivable for securities not delivered to the purchaser by the settlement date ("securities failed to deliver"). Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations include payables arising from unsettled securities transactions, payables to clearing organizations and amounts payable for securities not received from a seller by the settlement date ("securities failed to receive"). Unsettled securities transactions related to the Company's broker dealer operations are recorded at contract value on a net basis. Unsettled securities transactions related to the Company's consolidated municipal bond fund are recorded on a gross basis.

Collateralized Securities Transactions


SecuritiesPiper Sandler transitioned from a self clearing securities broker dealer to a fully disclosed clearing model in 2017. Pershing LLC ("Pershing") is Piper Sandler's clearing broker dealer responsible for the clearance and settlement of firm and customer cash and security transactions. In addition, subsequent to transitioning to a fully disclosed clearing model, the Company no longer enters into securities purchased under agreements to resell, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, are carried at the contractual amounts at which the securities will be subsequently resold or repurchased, including accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy to take possession or control of securities purchased under agreements to resell at the time these agreements are entered into. The counterparties to these agreements typically are primary dealers of U.S. government securities and major financial institutions. Collateral is valued daily, and additional collateral is obtained from or refunded to counterparties when appropriate.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued



Securities borrowed and loaned result from transactions with other broker dealers or financial institutions and are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received. These amounts are included in receivables from and payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Securities borrowed transactions require the Company to deposit cash or other collateral with the lender. Securities loaned transactions require the borrower to deposit cash with the Company. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and loaned on a daily basis, with additional collateral obtained or refunded as necessary.transactions.

Interest is accrued on securities borrowed and loaned transactions and is included in (i) other assets or other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition and (ii) the respective interest income or interest expense amounts on the consolidated statements of operations.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements of financial condition consist of financial instruments (including securities with extended settlements and derivative contracts) recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on the consolidated statements of operations. Securities (both long and short), including securities with extended settlements, are recognized on a trade-date basis. Additionally, certain of the Company’sCompany's investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition are recorded at fair value, either as required by accounting guidance or through the fair value election.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Fair Value Measurement Definition and Hierarchy – Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," ("ASC 820") defines fair value as the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs reflect management’smanagement's assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the observability of inputs as follows:


Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the report date. A quoted price for an identical asset or liability in an active market provides the most reliable fair value measurement because it is directly observable to the market.


Level II – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the report date. The nature of these financial instruments include instruments for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, instruments whose fair value have been derived using a model where inputs to the model are directly observable in the market, or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, and instruments that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.


Level III – Instruments that have little to no pricing observability as of the report date. These financial instruments are measured using management’smanagement's best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.


Valuation of Financial Instruments – Based on the nature of the Company’sCompany's business and its role as a "dealer" in the securities industry or as a manager of alternative asset management funds, the fair values of its financial instruments are determined internally. When available, the Company values financial instruments at observable market prices, observable market parameters, or broker or dealer prices (bid and ask prices). In the case of financial instruments transacted on recognized exchanges, the observable market prices represent quotations for completed transactions from the exchange on which the financial instrument is principally traded.


A substantial percentage of the fair value of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, are based on observable market prices, observable market parameters, or derived from broker or dealer prices. The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters can vary from product to product. Where available, observable market prices and pricing or market parameters in a product may be used
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


to derive a price without requiring significant judgment. In certain markets, observable market prices or market parameters are not available for all products, and fair value is determined using techniques appropriate for each particular product. These techniques involve some degree of judgment. Results from valuation models and other techniques in one period may not be indicative of future period fair value measurement.


For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable fair values, the determination of fair value requires the Company to estimate the value of the securities using the best information available. Among the factors considered by the Company in determining the fair value of such financial instruments are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar quality and yield, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation of investments. In instances where a security is subject to transfer restrictions, the value of the security is based primarily on the quoted price of a similar security without restriction but may be reduced by an amount estimated to reflect such restrictions. In addition, even where the Company derives the value of a security based on information from an independent source, certain assumptions may be required to determine the security’ssecurity's fair value. For instance, the Company assumes that the size of positions in securities that the Companyit holds would not be large enough to affect the quoted price of the securities if the firmCompany sells them, and that any such sale would happen in an orderly manner. The actual value realized upon disposition could be different from the currently estimated fair value.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Fixed Assets


Fixed assets include furniture and equipment, software and leasehold improvements. Furniture and equipment and software are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over ten years or the life of the lease, whichever is shorter. The

Leases

A lease is a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. In making this determination, the Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with internal use software projects and amortizes the amount over the expected useful lifeconsiders if it obtains substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the underlying asset generally three to seven years.and directs how and for what purpose the asset is used during the term of the contract.


Leases

The Company leases its corporate headquarters and other offices under various non-cancelable leases, all of which are operating leases. TheIn addition to rent, the leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, in addition to rent. The terms of the Company’s lease agreements generally range up to twelve years.maintenance. Some of the leases contain renewal and/or termination options, escalation clauses, rent-free holidays and operating cost adjustments. The original terms of the Company's lease agreements generally range up to 12 years. The weighted-average remaining lease term was 5.3 years at December 31, 2019.


The Company recognizes a right-of-use ("ROU") lease asset and lease liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. The lease liability represents the Company’s obligation to make future lease payments and is recorded at an amount equal to the present value of the remaining lease payments due over the lease term. The ROU lease asset, which represents the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term, is measured based on the carrying value of the lease liability, adjusted for other items, such as lease incentives and uneven rent payments.

The discount rate used to determine the present value of the remaining lease payments reflects the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term in a similar economic environment. In calculating its discount rates, the Company takes into consideration a current financing arrangement that is on a secured (i.e., collateralized) basis, as well as market interest rates and spreads, other reference points, and the respective tenors of the Company’s designated lease term ranges. The Company applies the portfolio approach in determining the discount rates for its leases. The weighted-average discount rate was 4.0 percent at December 31, 2019.

For leases that contain escalation clauses or rent-free holidays, the Company recognizes the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date the Company takes possession of the property to the end of the initial lease term. The Company records any difference between the straight-line rent amountsexpense and amounts payablepaid under the leases as part of other liabilities and accrued expenses.the amortization of the ROU lease asset.


Cash or lease incentives received upon entering into certain leases are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense from the date the Company takes possession of the property or receives the cash to the end of the initial lease term. The Company recordsLease incentives, which initially reduce the unamortized portionROU lease asset, are a component of the amortization of the ROU lease incentives as partasset.

Rent expense for leases with a term of other liabilities and accrued expenses.12 months or less is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the consolidated statements of operations.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets


Goodwill represents the fair value of the consideration transferred in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets at the acquisition date. The recoverability of goodwill is evaluated annually, at a minimum, or on an interim basis if circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. See Note 1312 for additional information on the Company's goodwill impairment testing.


Intangible assets with determinable lives consist of customer relationships, internally developed software and the Simmons & Company International ("Simmons") trade name and non-competition agreements that are amortized over their original estimated useful lives ranging from onetwo to teneight years. The pattern of amortization reflects the timing of the realization of the economic benefits of such intangible assets. Indefinite-life intangible assets consist of the ARI trade name. It is not amortized and is evaluated annually, at a minimum, or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Investments


The Company’sCompany's investments include equity investments in private companies and partnerships and investments in registered mutual funds, warrants of public and private companies and private company debt.funds. Equity investments in private companies are accounted for at fair value, as required by accounting guidance or if the fair value option was elected, or at cost.elected. Investments in partnerships are accounted for under the equity method, which is generally the net asset value, or at cost.value. Registered mutual funds are accounted for at fair value. Company-owned warrants with a cashless exercise option are valued at fair value, while warrants without a cashless exercise option are valued at cost. Private company debt investments are recorded at fair value, as required by accounting guidance, or at amortized cost, net of any unamortized premium or discount.


Other Assets


Other assets include net deferred income tax assets, receivables and prepaid expenses. Receivables include fee receivables, income tax receivables, accrued interest, and loans made to employees, typically in connection with their recruitment. Employee loans are forgiven based on continued employment and are amortized to compensation and benefits expense using the straight-line method over the respective terms of the loans, which generally range from two to five years.


Revenue Recognition


Investment Banking – Investment banking revenues, which include underwritingadvisory and advisoryunderwriting fees, are recorded when servicesthe performance obligation for the transactions are completedtransaction is satisfied under the terms of each engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Investment banking revenues are presented netgross of related unreimbursed expensesclient reimbursed deal expenses. Expenses for completed deals.deals are reported separately in deal-related expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Expenses related to investment banking deals not completed are recognized as non-interest expenses in their respective category on the consolidated statements of operations.


The Company's advisory fees generally consist of a nonrefundable up-front fee and a success fee. The nonrefundable fee is recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt and recognized at a point in time when the performance obligation is satisfied, or when the transaction is deemed by management to be terminated. Management's judgment is required in determining when a transaction is considered to be terminated.

The substantial majority of the Company's advisory and underwriting fees (i.e., the success-related advisory fee) are considered variable consideration and recognized when it is probable that the variable consideration will not be reversed in a future period. The variable consideration is considered to be constrained until satisfaction of the performance obligation. The Company's performance obligation is generally satisfied at a point in time upon the closing of a strategic transaction, completion of a financing or underwriting arrangement, or some other defined outcome (e.g., providing a fairness opinion). At this time, the Company has transferred control of the promised service and the customer obtains control. As these arrangements represent a single performance obligation, allocation of the transaction price is not necessary. The Company has elected to apply the following optional exemptions regarding disclosure of its remaining performance obligations: (i) the Company's performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less and/or (ii) the variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation.

Institutional Brokerage – Institutional brokerage revenues include (i) commissions received from customers for the execution of brokerage transactions in listed and over-the-counter (OTC) equity, fixed income and convertible debt securities, which are recordedrecognized at a point in time on a trade-date basis,the trade date because the customer has obtained the rights to the underlying security provided by the trade execution service, (ii) trading gains and losses, recorded based on changes in the fair value of long and short security positions in the reporting period and (iii) fees received by the Company for equity research. The Company permits institutional customers to allocate a portion of their gross commissions to pay for research products and other services provided by third parties. The amounts allocated for those purposes are commonly referred to as soft dollarcommission share agreements or "soft dollar" arrangements. As the Company is not acting as a principal in satisfying the primary obligorperformance obligation for these arrangements, expenses relating to soft dollars are netted against commission revenues and included in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition.


Asset Management – Asset management fees include revenues the Company receives in connection with management and investment advisory services performed for separately managed accounts and various funds and partnerships. These fees are recognized in the period in which services are provided. Fees are defined in client contracts as a percentage of portfolio assets under management and may include performance fees. Performance fees are earned when the investment return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark targets or other performance targets over a specified measurement period (monthly, quarterly or annually). Performance fees, if earned, are generally recognized at the end of the specified measurement period, typically the fourth quarter of the applicable year, or upon client liquidation. Performance fees are recognized as of each reporting date for certain consolidated entities.

Interest Revenue and Expense – The Company nets interest expense within net revenues to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates on the Company’sCompany's consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognizes contractual interest on financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, but not yet purchased (excluding derivative instruments), on an accrual basis as a component of interest revenue and expense. The Company accounts for interest related to its short-term financing and its senior notes on an accrual basis with related interest recorded as interest expense. In addition,

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Company recognizes interest revenue related to its securities borrowed and securities purchased under agreements to resell activities and interest expense related to its securities loaned and securities sold under agreements to repurchase activities on an accrual basis.Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued



Investment Income – Investment income includes realized and unrealized gains and losses from the Company's merchant banking, energy, senior living and other firm investments.investments, as well as management and performance fees generated from the Company’s alternative asset management funds.


Piper Jaffray Companies
NotesThe performance obligation related to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continuedtransfer of management and investment advisory services is satisfied over time and the related management fees are recognized under the output method, which reflects the fees that the Company has a right to invoice based on the services provided during the period. Fees are defined as a percentage of committed and/or invested capital. Amounts related to remaining performance obligations are not disclosed as the Company applies the output method.



Performance fees, if earned, are recognized when it is probable that such revenue will not be reversed in a future period. Management will consider such factors as the remaining assets and residual life of the fund to conclude whether it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur in the future.
Stock-based
See Note 22 for revenues from contracts with customers disaggregated by major business activity.

Stock-Based Compensation


FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, "Compensation Stock Compensation," ("ASC 718") requires all stock-based compensation to be expensed on the consolidated statements of operations based on the grant date fair value of the award. Compensation expense related to stock-based awards that do not require future service are recognized in the year in which the awards were deemed to be earned. Stock-based awards that require future service are amortized over the relevant service period netperiod. Forfeitures of estimated forfeitures.awards with service conditions are accounted for when they occur. See Note 2120 for additional information on the Company's accounting for stock-based compensation.


Income Taxes


The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, which includes all of its qualifying subsidiaries. The Company is also subject to income tax in various states and municipalities and those foreign jurisdictions in which we operate.it operates. Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial statement purposes, using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recognized to the extent that it is more likely than not that any portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Tax reserves for uncertain tax positions are recorded in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, "Income Taxes" ("ASC 740").


Earnings Per Share


Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Net income/(loss) applicable to common shareholders represents net income/(loss) reduced by the allocation of earnings to participating securities. LossesNo allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Distributed earnings (e.g., dividends) are not allocated to participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options, and restricted stock units.units and non-participating restricted shares.


Unvested stock-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the earnings allocation in the earnings per share calculation under the two-class method. The Company grants restricted stockSee Note 21 for additional information on the Company's participating and restricted stock units as part of its stock-based compensation program. Recipients of restricted stock are entitled to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period, and therefore meet the definition of a participating security. The Company's unvested restricted stock units are not participating securities as recipients are not eligible to receive nonforfeitable dividends.non-participating securities.


Foreign Currency Translation


The Company consolidates foreign subsidiaries which have designated their local currency as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated at year-endperiod-end rates of exchange. The gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements are included in other comprehensive income.income/(loss). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in net income.income/(loss).


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Contingencies


The Company is involved in various pending and potential legal proceedings related to its business, including litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. The Company establishes reserves for potential losses to the extent that claims are probable of loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The determination of the outcome and reserve amounts requires significant judgment on the part of the Company's management.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 3Recent Accounting Pronouncements


Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Consolidation

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" ("ASU 2015-02"). ASU 2015-02 makes several modifications to the consolidation guidance for VIEs and general partners' investments in limited partnerships, as well as modifications to the evaluation of whether limited partnerships are VIEs or voting interest entities. It was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 resulted in the deconsolidation of certain investment partnerships with assets (and the related noncontrolling interests) of approximately $9.4 million. There was no impact to the Company's retained earnings upon adoption. In addition, certain entities previously consolidated as voting entities became consolidated VIEs under the amended guidance.

Future Adoption of New Applicable Accounting Standards

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," ("ASU 2014-09") which supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires a company to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services, and also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. The FASB has subsequently issued various ASUs which amend specific areas of guidance in ASU 2014-09. The Company’s implementation efforts include the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance, and the potential impact on its consolidated results of operations and disclosures. The current industry treatment of netting deal expenses with investment banking revenues, and the timing of performance fee recognition related to certain consolidated entities and fees received for equity research may be impacted by the new guidance. The Company is also evaluating whether certain asset management contract costs can be capitalized on the consolidated statements of financial position. The Company will adopt this guidance as of January 1, 2018. The two permitted transition methods under ASU 2014-09 are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective method, under which the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is in the process of determining its method of adoption, which depends, in part, upon the completion of further analysis.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("ASU 2016-01"). The amendments in ASU 2016-01 address certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Except for the early application guidance outlined in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position, but may impact the Company's disclosures.


Leases


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-useROU lease asset and lease liability on the consolidated statements of financial positioncondition for all leases with a term longer than 12 months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from currentprevious U.S. GAAP.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 is effective for annualas of January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Asapplied the package of December 31, 2016,practical expedients in transitioning to the new guidance. Electing the package of practical expedients allowed the Company had approximately 65 operatingto carry forward its prior conclusions on lease definition, lease classification and initial direct costs related to the existing leases as of the adoption date. Also, the Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate lease components from nonlease components. Both at transition and for office space with aggregatenew leases thereafter, ROU lease assets and lease liabilities are initially recognized based on the present value of future minimum lease commitmentspayments over the lease term, including nonlease components such as fixed common area maintenance costs and other fixed costs (e.g., real estate taxes and insurance).

Upon adoption, the Company recognized a ROU lease asset of $78.4approximately $44.0 million and a lease liability of approximately $59.0 million. The Companydifference between the ROU lease asset and the lease liability is evaluating other service contracts which may include embedded leases. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company does not expect materialdue to lease incentives. There were no changes to the recognition of rent expense in itsthe Company's consolidated statements of operations. The impactoperations upon adoption of ASU 2016-02. In addition, the new guidance onhas not impacted Piper Jaffray’sSandler's net capital is expected to be minimal.position.


Piper Jaffray CompaniesFuture Adoption of New Applicable Accounting Standards
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Stock-Based Compensation

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 makes targeted amendments to the accounting for share-based payments to employees. Under ASU 2016-09, entities will be required to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, rather than as additional paid-in capital. ASU 2016-09 also amends the guidance regarding the employer’s statutory income tax withholding requirements and allows an entity to make an accounting policy election for forfeitures. The guidance is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $7.3 million of excess tax benefits recorded as additional paid-in capital, which will remain in additional paid-in capital upon adoption. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 will impact the Company's 2017 results of operations as excess tax benefits generated from the vesting of share-based awards will be recognized in the income statement as opposed to additional paid-in capital.

Financial Instruments Credit Losses


In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" ("ASU 2016-13"). The new guidance requires an entity to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts as opposed to delaying recognition until the loss was probable of occurring. ASU 2016-13 isbecame effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018.as of January 1, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


Statement of Cash Flows

Note 4Discontinued Operations

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statementthird quarter of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification2019, the Company completed the sale of Certain Cash Receiptsits traditional asset management business, which was conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary ARI. On September 20, 2019, the Company completed the sale of the master limited partnerships ("MLP") and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 clarifies how entities should classifyenergy infrastructure strategies business to Tortoise Capital Advisors. Additionally, on September 27, 2019, the Company completed the sale of its remaining equity strategies business to its former management team.

The transactions generated cash proceeds of $52.9 million and include the potential for the Company to receive additional cash consideration payments based on prospective revenues. The Company is eligible to receive an additional payment of up to $35.7 million contingent upon contractually defined MLP revenue exceeding a revenue threshold in the one-year period following the close of the transaction. The Company may also receive an additional payment based upon a multiple of aggregate revenue with respect to certain cash receipts and cashsub-advised accounts as of December 31, 2020. The Company will record a gain upon receipt of the earnout payments, if any.
Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


In addition, the Company is eligible to receive additional payments of up to a total of $10.0 million based on the statementrevenues of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective forthe equity strategies business during each of the four annual and interim periods beginning afterfrom January 1, 2020 to December 15, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.31, 2023. The Company expects that only a limited numberestimated the fair value of this earnout to be $2.2 million upon the close of the amendmentstransaction, which will impactbe reevaluated at each reporting date.

ARI's results, previously reported in the presentationAsset Management segment, have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the related assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale. As of its consolidated statementsDecember 31, 2018, the disposal group consisted of:
 December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2018
Assets 
Net deferred income tax assets$28,861
Fee receivables4,128
Intangible assets8,090
Other assets1,562
Total assets held for sale$42,641
  
Liabilities 
Accrued compensation$9,934
Other liabilities278
Total liabilities held for sale$10,212

The components of cash flows.discontinued operations were as follows:

In November 2016,
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Net revenues $26,546
 $43,489
 $51,301
       
Operating expenses 22,589
 35,227
 40,356
Intangible asset amortization and impairment (1) 5,465
 5,602
 5,222
Restructuring costs 10,268
 272
 
Goodwill impairment 
 
 114,363
Total non-interest expenses 38,322
 41,101
 159,941
       
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations before income tax expense/(benefit) (11,776) 2,388
 (108,640)
       
Income tax expense/(benefit) (2,522) 1,001
 (23,580)
       
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations before gain on sales (9,254) 1,387
 (85,060)
       
Gain on sales, net of tax 33,026
 
 
       
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $23,772
 $1,387
 $(85,060)
(1)Includes $2.9 million of intangible asset impairment related to the ARI trade name for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Note 5Acquisition of Weeden & Co. L.P.

On August 2, 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "StatementCompany completed the acquisition of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash"Weeden & Co. L.P. ("ASU 2016-18"Weeden & Co."). Under ASU 2016-18,, a broker dealer specializing in equity security sales and trading. The economic value of the acquisition was approximately $42.0 million and was completed pursuant to a securities purchase agreement dated February 24, 2019, as amended. The transaction added enhanced trade execution capabilities and scale to the Company's equities institutional sales and trading business.

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The Company acquired net assets with a fair value of $24.0 million as described below. As part of the purchase price, the Company granted $10.1 million in restricted cash as consideration on the acquisition date. The Company also entered into acquisition-related compensation arrangements with certain employees of $7.3 million in restricted stock for retention purposes. Both the restricted cash and restricted stock are subject to graded vesting, beginning on the third anniversary of the acquisition date, so long as the applicable employee remains continuously employed by the Company for such period. Compensation expense will be included withamortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of four years.

Additional cash and cash equivalents when reconcilingof up to $31.5 million may be earned if a net revenue target is achieved during the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shownperiod from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Weeden & Co.'s equity holders, a portion of which are now employees of the Company, are eligible to receive the additional payment. Employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for the rights to the additional payment. Amounts estimated to be payable to employees, if any, will be recorded as compensation expense on the consolidated statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effectiveoperations over the requisite performance period. The Company recorded a liability as of the acquisition date for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment" ("ASU 2017-04"). ASU 2017-04 eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation)related to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entitiesnon-employee equity holders. If earned, the amount will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company’s annual and any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017.paid by September 30, 2021.


Note 4Acquisitions

The following acquisitions wereThis acquisition was accounted for pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, "Business Combinations." Accordingly, the purchase price of each acquisition was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the respective acquisition dates.date. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was allocated between goodwill and intangible assets within the Capital Markets segment.

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Simmons & Company International

On February 26, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Simmons & Company International ("Simmons"), an employee-owned investment bank and broker dealer focused on the energy industry. The economic value of the acquisition was approximately $140.0 million and was completed pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 16, 2015, as amended. The acquisition of Simmons expands the Company's equity underwriting and institutional brokerage businesses into the energy sector and grows its advisory business.

assets. The Company acquired net assets with a fair valuerecorded $5.8 million of $119.3 million as described below. As part of the purchase price, the Company issued 1,149,340 restricted shares valued at $48.2 million as equity consideration on the acquisition date. Employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for the rights to the shares. Compensation expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of one or three years (a weighted average service period of 2.7 years). The fair value of the restricted stock was determined using the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the acquisition.

The Company also entered into acquisition-related compensation arrangements with certain employees of $20.6 million which consisted of cash ($9.0 million) and restricted stock ($11.6 million) for retention purposes. Compensation expense related to these arrangements will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of three years. Additional cash compensation may be available to certain investment banking employees subject to exceeding an investment banking revenue threshold during the three year post-acquisition period to the extent they are employed by the Company at the time of payment. Amounts estimated to be payable related to this performance award plan will be recorded as compensation expensegoodwill on the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite performance period of three years. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $4.3 million related to this performance award plan.

The Company recorded $60.7 million of goodwill on its consolidated statements of financial condition, all of which $59.4 million is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The final goodwill recorded on the Company's consolidated statements of financial condition may differ from that reflected herein as a result of measurement period adjustments. In management's opinion, the goodwill represents the reputation and operating expertise of Simmons.Weeden & Co.


Identifiable intangible assets purchased by the Company consisted of customer relationships and the Simmons trade nameinternally developed software with acquisition-date fair values of $17.5$12.0 million and $9.1$4.7 million, respectively.

Transaction costs of $0.9$1.9 million were incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, and are included in restructuring and integration costs on the consolidated statements of operations.


In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company recorded the following measurement period adjustments: $1.5 million to reflect the final fair value of Weeden & Co.'s intangible assets and $4.1 million related to a liability for uncertain state and local income tax positions and the corresponding indemnification asset and deferred tax asset.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair valuevalues of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:acquisition, including measurement period adjustments:
(Dollars in thousands) 
Assets 
Cash and cash equivalents$4,351
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations1,623
Fixed assets289
Goodwill5,794
Intangible assets16,700
Right-of-use lease asset6,811
Other assets10,888
Total assets acquired46,456
  
Liabilities 
Accrued compensation2,156
Accrued lease liability6,811
Other liabilities and accrued expenses13,464
Total liabilities assumed22,431
  
Net assets acquired$24,025

(Dollars in thousands)  
Assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $47,201
Fixed assets 1,868
Goodwill 60,737
Intangible assets 26,638
Investments 980
Other assets 5,071
Total assets acquired 142,495
   
Liabilities:  
Accrued compensation 15,387
Other liabilities and accrued expenses 7,814
Total liabilities assumed 23,201
   
Net assets acquired $119,294


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Simmons’Weeden & Co.'s results of operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements prospectively beginning on the date of acquisition. The acquisition has been fully integrated with the Company's existing operations. Accordingly, post-acquisition revenues and net income are not discernible. The following unaudited pro forma financial data assumes that the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the comparable prior periodsperiod presented. Pro forma results have been prepared by adjusting the Company's historical results to include Simmons'Weeden & Co.'s results of operations adjusted for the following changes: amortization expense was adjusted to account for the acquisition-date fair value of intangible assets; compensation and benefits expenses were adjusted to reflect such expenses based on the Company’s compensation arrangementsrestricted cash issued as part of the purchase price and the restricted stock issued as equity consideration;for retention purposes; and the income tax effect of applying the Company's statutory tax rates to Simmons’Weeden & Co.'s results of operations. The Company's consolidated unaudited pro forma information presented does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the applicable periods presented, does not contemplate client account overlap and anticipated operational efficiencies of the combined entities, nor does it indicate the results of operations in future periods.
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Net revenues$870,525
 $816,366
 $894,582
Net income from continuing operations applicable to Piper Sandler Companies83,582
 53,561
 20,070

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Net revenues$755,146
 $753,369
 $752,197
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies(16,411) 47,290
 57,939


River Branch Holdings LLC and BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc.

On September 30, 2015, the Company acquired the assets of River Branch Holdings LLC ("River Branch"), an equity investment banking boutique focused on the financial institutions sector. On October 9, 2015, the Company completed the purchase of BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc. ("BMO GKST"), a municipal bond sales, trading and origination business of BMO Financial Corp. The Company recorded $6.1 million of goodwill on the consolidated statements of financial condition related to these acquisitions and $7.5 million of identifiable intangible assets consisting of customer relationships. In management's opinion, the goodwill represents the reputation and operating expertise of River Branch and BMO GKST.

The results of operations of River Branch and BMO GKST have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements prospectively from the respective dates of acquisition. The terms of these transactions were not disclosed as the acquisitions did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 56Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased


 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:   
Corporate securities:   
Equity securities$3,046
 $1,458
Convertible securities146,406
 92,485
Fixed income securities28,176
 31,906
Municipal securities:   
Taxable securities22,570
 38,711
Tax-exempt securities222,192
 268,804
Short-term securities67,901
 52,472
Mortgage-backed securities13
 15
U.S. government agency securities51,773
 123,384
U.S. government securities77,303
 954
Derivative contracts20,382
 17,033
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned$639,762
 $627,222
    
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:   
Corporate securities:   
Equity securities$94,036
 $82,082
Fixed income securities10,311
 20,180
U.S. government agency securities9,935
 10,257
U.S. government securities67,090
 60,365
Derivative contracts4,053
 4,543
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$185,425
 $177,427

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:   
Corporate securities:   
Equity securities$6,363
 $9,505
Convertible securities103,486
 18,460
Fixed income securities21,018
 48,654
Municipal securities:   
Taxable securities63,090
 111,591
Tax-exempt securities559,329
 416,966
Short-term securities35,175
 33,068
Mortgage-backed securities5,638
 121,794
U.S. government agency securities205,685
 188,140
U.S. government securities29,970
 7,729
Derivative contracts29,217
 35,027
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned1,058,971
 990,934
    
Less noncontrolling interests (1)(57,700) (43,397)
 $1,001,271
 $947,537
    
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:   
Corporate securities:   
Equity securities$89,453
 $15,740
Fixed income securities17,324
 39,909
U.S. government agency securities6,723
 21,267
U.S. government securities180,650
 159,037
Derivative contracts5,207
 3,202
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased299,357
 239,155
    
Less noncontrolling interests (2)(631) (4,586)
 $298,726
 $234,569
(1)
Noncontrolling interests attributable to third party ownership in a consolidated municipal bond fund consist of $1.3 million and $7.5 million of taxable municipal securities, $55.2 million and $35.1 million of tax-exempt municipal securities, and $1.2 million and $0.8 million of derivative contracts as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 
(2)Noncontrolling interests attributable to third party ownership in a consolidated municipal bond fund consist of U.S. government securities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


At December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, financial instruments and other inventory positions owned in the amount of $594.4$205.7 million and $707.4$147.4 million,, respectively, had been pledged as collateral for short-term financings and repurchase agreements.financings.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the security in the market at prevailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities sold short at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company economically hedges changes in the market value of its financial instruments and other inventory positions owned using inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, interest rate derivatives, credit default swap index contracts,and U.S. treasury bond and Eurodollar futures and exchange traded options.

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued



Derivative Contract Financial Instruments


The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, credit default swap index contracts, U.Sand U.S. treasury bond and Eurodollar futures and equity option contractsoptions as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The Company also enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate customer transactions. The following describes the Company’sCompany's derivatives by the type of transaction or security the instruments are economically hedging.


Customer matched-book derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts in a principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the financial needs of its customers. The Company simultaneously enters into an interest rate derivative contract with a third party for the same notional amount to hedge the interest rate and credit risk of the initial client interest rate derivative contract. In certain limited instances, the Company has only hedged interest rate risk with a third party, and retains uncollateralized credit risk as described below. The instruments use interest rates based upon either the London Interbank OfferOffered Rate ("LIBOR") index or the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") index.


Trading securities derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts and uses U.S. treasury bond futures and Eurodollar futuresoptions to hedge interest rate and market value risks associated with its fixed income securities. These instruments use interest rates based upon either the Municipal Market Data ("MMD") index, LIBOR or the SIFMA index. ThePrior to 2018, the Company also enters intoused credit default swap index contracts to hedge credit risk associated with its taxable fixed income securities and option contracts to hedge market value risk associated with its convertible securities.


Derivatives are reported on a net basis by counterparty (i.e., the net payable or receivable for derivative assets and liabilities for a given counterparty) when a legal right of offset exists and on a net basis by cross product when applicable provisions are stated in master netting agreements. Cash collateral received or paid is netted on a counterparty basis, provided a legal right of offset exists. The total absolute notional contract amount, representing the absolute value of the sum of gross long and short derivative contracts, provides an indication of the volume of the Company's derivative activity and does not represent gains and losses. The following table presents the gross fair market value and the total absolute notional contract amount of the Company's outstanding derivative instruments, prior to counterparty netting, by asset or liability position:
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Derivative Derivative Notional Derivative Derivative Notional
Derivative Category Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount
Interest rate            
Customer matched-book $209,119
 $198,315
 $2,197,340
 $181,199
 $169,950
 $2,532,966
Trading securities 8
 1,852
 110,875
 408
 4,202
 262,275
  $209,127
 $200,167
 $2,308,215
 $181,607
 $174,152
 $2,795,241
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands) Derivative Derivative Notional Derivative Derivative Notional
Derivative Category Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount
Interest rate            
Customer matched-book $288,955
 $272,819
 $3,330,207
 $406,888
 $386,284
 $4,392,440
Trading securities 13,952
 1,707
 423,550
 
 7,685
 290,600
Credit default swap index            
Trading securities 
 127
 7,470
 5,411
 530
 94,270
Futures and equity options            
Trading securities 
 
 
 164
 149
 2,345,037
  $302,907
 $274,653
 $3,761,227
 $412,463
 $394,648
 $7,122,347

(1)Derivative assets are included within financial instruments and other inventory positions owned on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
(2)Derivative liabilities are included within financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements of financial condition.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The Company’sCompany's derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, unrealized gains and losses are recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. The gains and losses on the related economically hedged inventory positions are not disclosed below as they are not in qualifying hedging relationships. The following table presents the Company’sCompany's unrealized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments:
(Dollars in thousands)   Year Ended December 31,
Derivative Category Operations Category 2019 2018 2017
Interest rate derivative contract Investment banking $(912) $(1,880) $(2,608)
Interest rate derivative contract Institutional brokerage 2,417
 334
 (16,772)
Credit default swap index contract Institutional brokerage 
 
 4,482
Futures and equity option derivative contracts Institutional brokerage 
 
 (17)
    $1,505
 $(1,546) $(14,915)

(Dollars in thousands)   Year Ended December 31,
Derivative Category Operations Category 2016 2015 2014
Interest rate derivative contract Investment banking $(4,151) $(2,274) $(2,790)
Interest rate derivative contract Institutional brokerage 19,613
 534
 (1,678)
Credit default swap index contract Institutional brokerage 4,317
 12,228
 (1,080)
Futures and equity option derivative contracts Institutional brokerage 255
 (252) 1,037
    $20,034
 $10,236
 $(4,511)

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued



Credit risk associated with the Company’sCompany's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. Credit exposure associated with the Company’sCompany's derivatives is driven by uncollateralized market movements in the fair value of the contracts with counterparties and is monitored regularly by the Company’sCompany's financial risk committee. The Company considers counterparty credit risk in determining derivative contract fair value. The majority of the Company’sCompany's derivative contracts are substantially collateralized by its counterparties, who are major financial institutions. The Company has a limited number of counterparties who are not required to post collateral. Based on market movements, the uncollateralized amounts representing the fair value of the derivative contract can become material, exposing the Company to the credit risk of these counterparties. As of December 31, 20162019, the Company had $22.719.2 million of uncollateralized credit exposure with these counterparties (notional contract amount of $183.4173.2 million), including $15.616.2 million of uncollateralized credit exposure with one counterparty.


Note 67Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Based on the nature of the Company’sCompany's business and its role as a "dealer" in the securities industry or as a manager of alternative asset management funds, the fair values of its financial instruments are determined internally. The Company’sCompany's processes are designed to ensure that the fair values used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable inputs are not available, unobservable inputs are developed based on an evaluation of all relevant empirical market data, including prices evidenced by market transactions, interest rates, credit spreads, volatilities and correlations and other security-specific information. Valuation adjustments related to illiquidity or counterparty credit risk are also considered. In estimating fair value, the Company may utilize information provided by third party pricing vendors to corroborate internally-developed fair value estimates.


The Company employs specific control processes to determine the reasonableness of the fair value of its financial instruments. The Company’sCompany's processes are designed to ensure that the internally-estimated fair values are accurately recorded and that the data inputs and the valuation techniques used are appropriate, consistently applied, and that the assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the objective of determining fair value. Individuals outside of the trading departments perform independent pricing verification reviews as of each reporting date. The Company has established parameters which set forth when the fair value of securities are independently verified. The selection parameters are generally based upon the type of security, the level of estimation risk of a security, the materiality of the security to the Company’sCompany's consolidated financial statements, changes in fair value from period to period, and other specific facts and circumstances of the Company’sCompany's securities portfolio. In evaluating the initial internally-estimated fair values made by the Company’sCompany's traders, the nature and complexity of securities involved (e.g., term, coupon, collateral, and other key drivers of value), level of market activity for securities, and availability of market data are considered. The independent price verification procedures include, but are not limited to, analysis of trade data (both internal and external where available), corroboration to the valuation of positions with similar characteristics, risks and components, or comparison to an alternative pricing source, such as a discounted cash flow model. The Company’sCompany's valuation committee, comprised of members of senior management and risk management, provides oversight and overall responsibility for the internal control processes and procedures related to fair value measurements.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.


Cash Equivalents


Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value and classified as Level I.


Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned


The Company records financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition with unrealized gains and losses reflected on the consolidated statements of operations.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Equity securities – Exchange traded equity securities are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange for identical assets or liabilities as of the period-end date. To the extent these securities are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied, they are categorized as Level I. Non-exchange traded equity securities (principally hybrid preferred securities) are measured primarily using broker quotations, prices observed for recently executed market transactions and internally-developed fair value estimates based on observable inputs and are categorized within Level II of the fair value hierarchy.


Convertible securities – Convertible securities are valued based on observable trades, when available. Accordingly, these convertible securitiesavailable, and therefore are generally categorized as Level II.


Corporate fixed income securities – Fixed income securities include corporate bonds which are valued based on recently executed market transactions of comparable size, internally-developed fair value estimates based on observable inputs, or broker quotations. Accordingly, these corporate bonds are categorized as Level II.


Taxable municipal securities – Taxable municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II.

Tax-exempt municipal securities – Tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Certain illiquid taxabletax-exempt municipal securities are valued using market data for comparable securities (maturity(e.g., maturity and sector) and management judgment to infer an appropriate current yield or other model-based valuation techniques deemed appropriate by management based on the specific nature of the individual security and are therefore categorized as Level III.


Tax-exempt municipal securities – Tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Certain illiquid tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using market data for comparable securities (maturity and sector) and management judgment to infer an appropriate current yield or other model-based valuation techniques deemed appropriate by management based on the specific nature of the individual security and are therefore categorized as Level III.

Short-term municipal securities – Short-term municipal securities include auction rate securities, variable rate demand notes, and other short-term municipal securities. Variable rate demand notes and other short-term municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Auction rate securities with limited liquidity are categorized as Level III and are valued using discounted cash flow models with unobservable inputs such as the Company’sCompany's expected recovery rate on the securities.


Mortgage-backed securities – Mortgage-backed securities are valued using observable trades, when available. Certain mortgage-backed securities are valued using models where inputs to the model are directly observable in the market, or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. TheseTo the extent we hold, these mortgage-backed securities are categorized as Level II. Other mortgage-backed securities, which are principally collateralized by residential mortgages, have experienced low volumes of executed transactions resulting in less observable transaction data. Certain mortgage-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages are valued using cash flow models that utilize unobservable inputs including credit default rates, prepayment rates, loss severity and valuation yields. As judgment is used to determine the range of these inputs, these mortgage-backed securities are categorized as Level III.


U.S. government agency securities – U.S. government agency securities include agency debt bonds and mortgage bonds. Agency debt bonds are valued by using either direct price quotes or price quotes for comparable bond securities and are categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds include bonds secured by mortgages, mortgage pass-through securities, agency collateralized mortgage-obligation ("CMO") securities and agency interest-only securities. Mortgage pass-through securities, CMO securities and interest-only securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or other observable inputs, such as prepayment speeds and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds are valued using observable market inputs, such as market yields ranging from 126-952 basis points ("bps") on spreads over U.S. treasury securities, or models based upon prepayment expectations ranging from13%-33% conditional prepayment rate ("CPR").expectations. These securities are categorized as Level II.

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


U.S. government securities – U.S. government securities include highly liquid U.S. treasury securities which are generally valued using quoted market prices and therefore categorized as Level I. The Company does not transact in securities of countries other than the U.S. government.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsDerivative contracts Continued


Derivatives – Derivative contracts include interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, credit default swap index contracts, U.Sand U.S. treasury bond and Eurodollar futures and equity option contracts.options. These instruments derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a combination of these factors. The Company's equity option derivative contracts are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange for identical assets or liabilities as of the period-end date. To the extent these contracts are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied, they are categorized as Level I. The Company’s credit default swap index contracts are valued using market price quotations and are classified as Level II. The majority of the Company’sCompany's interest rate derivative contracts, including both interest rate swaps and interest rate locks, are valued using market standard pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows. The valuation models used do not involve material subjectivity as the methodologies do not entail significant judgment and the pricing inputs are market observable, including contractual terms, yield curves and measures of volatility. These instruments are classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy. Certain interest rate locks transact in less active markets and were valued using valuation models that included the previously mentioned observable inputs and certain unobservable inputs that required significant judgment, such as the premium over the MMD curve. These instruments are classified as Level III.


Investments


The Company’sCompany's investments valued at fair value include equity investments in private companies and partnerships and investments in registered mutual funds, warrants of public and private companies and private company debt.funds. Investments in registered mutual funds are valued based on quoted prices on active markets and classified as Level I. Company-owned warrants, which have a cashless exercise option, are valued based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and certain unobservable inputs. The Company applies a liquidity discount to the value of its warrants in public and private companies. For warrants in private companies, valuation adjustments, based upon management’s judgment, are made to account for differences between the measured security and the stock volatility factors of comparable companies. Company-owned warrants are reported as Level III assets. Investments in private companies are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering rounds of financing, third party transactions and market-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA")) and changes in market outlook, among other factors. These securities are generally categorized as Level III.


Fair Value Option – The fair value option permits the irrevocable fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument. The fair value option was elected for certain merchant banking and other investments at inception to reflect economic events in earnings on a timely basis. Merchant banking and other equity investments of $19.72.1 million, and $3.0 million, included within investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition, arewere accounted for at fair value and arewere classified as Level III assets at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, respectively. The realized and unrealized net gainsimpact from fair value changes included in earnings as a result of electing to apply the fair value option to certain financial assets were losses of $0.6 million, gains of $1.80.6 million, $1.3 million and $2.7gains of $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The following table summarizes quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’sCompany's Level III financial instruments as of December 31, 20162019:
 Valuation     Weighted
 Technique Unobservable Input Range Average
Assets:       
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:       
Municipal securities:       
Taxable securitiesDiscounted cash flow Expected recovery rate (% of par) (2) 62.6% 62.6%
Tax-exempt securitiesDiscounted cash flow Expected recovery rate (% of par) (2) 5 - 60% 19.4%
Short-term securitiesDiscounted cash flow Expected recovery rate (% of par) (2) 66 - 94% 91.0%
Mortgage-backed securities:       
Collateralized by residential mortgagesDiscounted cash flow Credit default rates (3) 0 - 4% 2.7%
   Prepayment rates (4) 1 - 35% 6.5%
   Loss severity (3) 0 - 100% 72.9%
   Valuation yields (3) 3 - 7% 3.8%
Derivative contracts:       
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flow Premium over the MMD curve (1) 1 - 19 bps 6.9 bps
Investments at fair value:       
Equity securities in private companiesMarket approach Revenue multiple (2) 2 - 4 times 3.8 times
   EBITDA multiple (2) 10 - 15 times 12.0 times
        
Liabilities:       
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:       
Derivative contracts:       
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flow Premium over the MMD curve (1) 2 - 30 bps 17.1 bps
ValuationWeighted
TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeAverage (1)
Assets
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:
Derivative contracts:
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flowPremium over the MMD curve in basis points ("bps") (2)  6.5 bps6.5 bps
Investments at fair value:
Equity securities in private companiesMarket approachRevenue multiple (2)3 - 6 times4.5 times
EBITDA multiple (2)11 - 20 times15.7 times
Liabilities
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:
Derivative contracts:
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flowPremium over the MMD curve in bps (3)0 - 21 bps4.7 bps
SensitivityUncertainty of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs:measurements:
(1)Significant increase/(decrease) inUnobservable inputs were weighted by the unobservable input in isolation would result in a significantly lower/(higher)relative fair value measurement.of the financial instruments.
(2)Significant increase/(decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would resulthave resulted in a significantly higher/(lower) fair value measurement.
(3)Significant changesincrease/(decrease) in any of these inputsthe unobservable input in isolation could resultwould have resulted in a significantly different fair value. Generally, a change in the assumption used for credit default rates is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally inverse change in the assumption for valuation yields.
(4)The potential impact of changes in prepayment rates onlower/(higher) fair value is dependent on other security-specific factors, such as the par value and structure. Changes in the prepayment rates may result in directionally similar or directionally inverse changes in fair value depending on whether the security trades at a premium or discount to the par value.measurement.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments by pricing observability levels defined in ASC 820 as of December 31, 20162019:
      Counterparty        Counterparty  
      and Cash        and Cash  
      Collateral        Collateral  
(Dollars in thousands)Level I Level II Level III Netting (1) TotalLevel I Level II Level III Netting (1) Total
Assets:         
Assets         
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$82
 $6,281
 $
 $
 $6,363
$469
 $2,577
 $
 $
 $3,046
Convertible securities
 103,486
 
 
 103,486

 146,406
 
 
 146,406
Fixed income securities
 21,018
 
 
 21,018

 28,176
 
 
 28,176
Municipal securities:                  
Taxable securities
 60,404
 2,686
 
 63,090

 22,570
 
 
 22,570
Tax-exempt securities
 558,252
 1,077
 
 559,329

 222,192
 
 
 222,192
Short-term securities
 34,431
 744
 
 35,175

 67,901
 
 
 67,901
Mortgage-backed securities
 273
 5,365
 
 5,638

 
 13
 
 13
U.S. government agency securities
 205,685
 
 
 205,685

 51,773
 
 
 51,773
U.S. government securities29,970
 
 
 
 29,970
77,303
 
 
 
 77,303
Derivative contracts
 288,955
 13,952
 (273,690) 29,217

 209,119
 8
 (188,745) 20,382
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned30,052
 1,278,785
 23,824
 (273,690) 1,058,971
77,772
 750,714
 21
 (188,745) 639,762
                  
Cash equivalents768
 
 
 
 768
226,744
 
 
 
 226,744
                  
Investments at fair value32,783
 
 123,319
(2)
 156,102
17,658
 
 132,329
(2)
 149,987
Total assets$63,603
 $1,278,785
 $147,143
 $(273,690) $1,215,841
$322,174
 $750,714
 $132,350
 $(188,745) $1,016,493
                  
Liabilities:         
Liabilities         
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$89,453
 $
 $
 $
 $89,453
$88,794
 $5,242
 $
 $
 $94,036
Fixed income securities
 17,324
 
 
 17,324

 10,311
 
 
 10,311
U.S. government agency securities
 6,723
 
 
 6,723

 9,935
 
 
 9,935
U.S. government securities180,650
 
 
 
 180,650
67,090
 
 
 
 67,090
Derivative contracts
 273,166
 1,487
 (269,446) 5,207

 198,604
 1,563
 (196,114) 4,053
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$270,103
 $297,213
 $1,487
 $(269,446) $299,357
$155,884
 $224,092
 $1,563
 $(196,114) $185,425
(1)Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company had no0 securities posted as collateral to its counterparties.
(2)Noncontrolling interests of $45.1$75.2 million are attributable to unrelated third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments by pricing observability levels defined in ASC 820 as of December 31, 20152018:
      Counterparty        Counterparty  
      and Cash        and Cash  
      Collateral        Collateral  
(Dollars in thousands)Level I Level II Level III Netting (1) TotalLevel I Level II Level III Netting (1) Total
Assets:         
Assets         
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$7,569
 $1,936
 $
 $
 $9,505
$331
 $1,127
 $
 $
 $1,458
Convertible securities
 18,460
 
 
 18,460

 92,485
 
 
 92,485
Fixed income securities
 48,654
 
 
 48,654

 31,906
 
 
 31,906
Municipal securities:                  
Taxable securities
 105,775
 5,816
 
 111,591

 38,711
 
 
 38,711
Tax-exempt securities
 415,789
 1,177
 
 416,966

 268,804
 
 
 268,804
Short-term securities
 32,348
 720
 
 33,068

 52,472
 
 
 52,472
Mortgage-backed securities
 670
 121,124
 
 121,794

 
 15
 
 15
U.S. government agency securities
 188,140
 
 
 188,140

 123,384
 
 
 123,384
U.S. government securities7,729
 
 
 
 7,729
954
 
 
 
 954
Derivative contracts164
 412,299
 
 (377,436) 35,027

 181,378
 229
 (164,574) 17,033
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned15,462
 1,224,071
 128,837
 (377,436) 990,934
1,285
 790,267
 244
 (164,574) 627,222
                  
Cash equivalents130,138
 
 
 
 130,138
20,581
 
 
 
 20,581
                  
Investments at fair value34,874
 
 109,444
(2)
 144,318
33,587
 2,649
 107,792
(2)
 144,028
Total assets$180,474
 $1,224,071
 $238,281
 $(377,436) $1,265,390
$55,453
 $792,916
 $108,036
 $(164,574) $791,831
                  
Liabilities:         
Liabilities         
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$13,489
 $2,251
 $
 $
 $15,740
$81,575
 $507
 $
 $
 $82,082
Fixed income securities
 39,909
 
 
 39,909

 20,180
 
 
 20,180
U.S. government agency securities
 21,267
 
 
 21,267

 10,257
 
 
 10,257
U.S. government securities159,037
 
 
 
 159,037
60,365
 
 
 
 60,365
Derivative contracts149
 387,351
 7,148
 (391,446) 3,202

 169,950
 4,202
 (169,609) 4,543
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$172,675
 $450,778
 $7,148
 $(391,446) $239,155
$141,940
 $200,894
 $4,202
 $(169,609) $177,427
(1)Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company had no0 securities posted as collateral to its counterparties.
(2)Noncontrolling interests of $41.0$53.0 million are attributable to unrelated third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds and private equity investment vehicles.funds.


The Company’sCompany's Level III assets were $147.1$132.4 million and $238.3$108.0 million, or 12.113.0 percent and 18.813.6 percent of financial instruments measured at fair value at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The value ofThere were 0 significant transfers between levels are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period. There were $9.1 million of transfers of financial assets out of Level III for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily related to the deconsolidation of certain investment partnerships as discussed in Note 3. There were no other significant transfers between Level I, Level II or Level III for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.




Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The following tables summarize the changes in fair value associated with Level III financial instruments held at the beginning or end of the periods presented:
                Unrealized gains/                Unrealized gains/
                (losses) for assets/                (losses) for assets/
Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held atBalance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ December 31, December 31,December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2015 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2016 2016 (1)2018 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (losses) 2019 2019
Assets:                 
Assets                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                                  
Municipal securities:                 
Taxable securities$5,816
 $
 $(3,700) $
 $
 $554
 $16
 $2,686
 $16
Tax-exempt securities1,177
 
 
 
 
 
 (100) 1,077
 (100)
Short-term securities720
 
 
 
 
 
 24
 744
 24
Mortgage-backed securities121,124
 26,519
 (142,263) 
 
 3,495
 (3,510) 5,365
 69
$15
 $
 $(6) $
 $
 $(23) $27
 $13
 $
Derivative contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 13,952
 13,952
 13,952
229
 42
 (796) 
 
 755
 (222) 8
 8
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned128,837
 26,519
 (145,963) 
 
 4,049
 10,382
 23,824
 13,961
244
 42
 (802) 
 
 732
 (195) 21
 8
                                  
Investments at fair value109,444
 33,683
 (28,343) 
 (9,088) 10,336
 7,287
 123,319
 7,014
107,792
 23,624
 (14,897) 
 (783) 2,901
 13,692
 132,329
 16,105
Total assets$238,281
 $60,202
 $(174,306) $
 $(9,088) $14,385
 $17,669
 $147,143
 $20,975
$108,036
 $23,666
 $(15,699) $
 $(783) $3,633
 $13,497
 $132,350
 $16,113
                                  
Liabilities:                 
Liabilities                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                                  
Derivative contracts$7,148
 $(14,653) $
 $
 $
 $14,653
 $(5,661) $1,487
 $1,487
$4,202
 $(16,311) $
 $
 $
 $16,311
 $(2,639) $1,563
 $1,563
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$7,148
 $(14,653) $
 $
 $
 $14,653
 $(5,661) $1,487
 $1,487
$4,202
 $(16,311) $
 $
 $
 $16,311
 $(2,639) $1,563
 $1,563
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income on the consolidated statements of operations.

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




                 Unrealized gains/
                 (losses) for assets/
 Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
 December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (losses) 2018 2018
Assets                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                 
Municipal securities:                 
Tax-exempt securities$700
 $
 $
 $
 $(700) $
 $
 $
 $
Short-term securities714
 
 (775) 
 
 54
 7
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities481
 
 (5) 
 
 
 (461) 15
 (95)
Derivative contracts126
 725
 (3,807) 
 
 3,082
 103
 229
 229
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned2,021
 725
 (4,587) 
 (700) 3,136
 (351) 244
 134
                  
Investments at fair value126,060
 15,988
 (36,444) 
 (502) 14,015
 (11,325) 107,792
 (1,775)
Total assets$128,081
 $16,713
 $(41,031) $
 $(1,202) $17,151
 $(11,676) $108,036
 $(1,641)
                  
Liabilities                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                 
Derivative contracts$4,433
 $(2,815) $3,266
 $
 $
 $(451) $(231) $4,202
 $4,202
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$4,433
 $(2,815) $3,266
 $
 $
 $(451) $(231) $4,202
 $4,202

                 Unrealized gains/
                 (losses) for assets/
 Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
 December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2014 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2015 2015 (1)
Assets:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                 
Municipal securities:                 
Taxable securities$
 $5,133
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $683
 $5,816
 $683
Tax-exempt securities1,186
 
 
 
 
 
 (9) 1,177
 (9)
Short-term securities720
 
 
 
 
 
 
 720
 
Mortgage-backed securities124,749
 130,534
 (138,874) 
 
 3,301
 1,414
 121,124
 2,157
Derivative contracts140
 520
 
 
 
 (520) (140) 
 
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned126,795
 136,187
 (138,874) 
 
 2,781
 1,948
 128,837
 2,831
                  
Investments at fair value74,165
 18,589
 (1,089) 
 
 84
 17,695
 109,444
 17,589
Total assets$200,960
 $154,776
 $(139,963) $
 $
 $2,865
 $19,643
 $238,281
 $20,420
                  
Liabilities:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                 
Derivative contracts$7,822
 $(10,349) $
 $
 $
 $10,349
 $(674) $7,148
 $7,148
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$7,822
 $(10,349) $
 $
 $
 $10,349
 $(674) $7,148
 $7,148

(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income on the consolidated statements of operations.

Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income on the consolidated statements of operations.

The carrying values of the Company’sCompany's cash, securities either purchased or sold under agreements to resell, receivables and payables either from or to customers and brokers, dealers and clearing organizations and short-term financings approximate fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurement

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $82.9 million representing approximately 42 percent of the value of goodwill attributable to the asset management reporting unit. The fair value measurement used in the analysis was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and market approach (earnings multiples of public company comparables). The discounted cash flow model was calculated using unobservable inputs, such as revenue and EBITDA forecasts, which are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 for further discussion.


Note 78Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs")


The Company has investments in and/or acts as the managing partner of various partnerships, limited liability companies, or registered mutual funds. These entities were established for the purpose of investing in securities of public or private companies, or municipal debt obligations, or providing financing to senior living facilities, and were initially financed through the capital commitments or seed investments of the members.


VIEs are entities in which equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities. The determination as to whether an entity is a VIE is based on the structure and nature
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


of each entity. The Company also considers other characteristics such as the power through voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’sentity's economic performance and how the entity is financed.


The Company is required to consolidate all VIEs for which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The determination as to whether the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary is based on whether the Company has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’sentity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2015-02. Prior

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the adoption of ASU 2015-02, the primary beneficiary analysis differed for entities which qualified for the deferral under previous consolidation guidance (i.e., asset managers and investment companies). For these entities, the Company was considered to be the primary beneficiary if it absorbed a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, received a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, or both.Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued



Consolidated VIEs


The Company’sCompany's consolidated VIEs at December 31, 20162019 include certain alternative asset management funds in which the Company has an investment and, as the managing partner, is deemed to have both the power to direct the most significant activities of the funds and the right to receive benefits (or the obligation to absorb losses) that could potentially be significant to these funds. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2015-02, these entities lacked the characteristics of a VIE and were consolidated as voting interest entities.


The following table presents information about the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of the VIEs which are consolidated by the Company and included on the consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2016.2019. The assets can only be used to settle the liabilities of the respective VIE, and the creditors of the VIEs do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company. One of these VIEs has $25.0 million of bank line financing available with an interest rate based on prime plus an applicable margin. The assets and liabilities are presented prior to consolidation, and thus a portion of these assets and liabilities are eliminated in consolidation.


  Alternative Asset
(Dollars in thousands) Management Funds
Assets  
Investments $129,646
Other assets 2,586
Total assets $132,232
   
Liabilities  
Other liabilities and accrued expenses $2,859
Total liabilities $2,859

  Alternative Asset
(Dollars in thousands) Management Funds
Assets:  
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations $7,768
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral 332,317
Investments 101,099
Other assets 5,602
Total assets $446,786
   
Liabilities:  
Short-term financing $271,811
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations 13,948
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased 3,632
Other liabilities and accrued expenses 5,120
Total liabilities $294,511


The Company has investments in a grantor trust which was established as part of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the grantor trust. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the grantor trust are consolidated by the Company on the consolidated statements of financial condition. See Note 2120 for additional information on the nonqualified deferred compensation plan.


Nonconsolidated VIEs


The Company determined it is not the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs and accordingly does not consolidate them. These VIEs had net assets approximating $0.8 billion and $0.4$0.3 billion at December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018. The Company’sCompany's exposure to loss from these VIEs is $7.6$7.0 million, which is the carrying value of its capital contributions recorded in investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2016.2019. The Company had no0 liabilities related to these VIEs at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018. Furthermore, the Company has not provided financial or other support to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide as of December 31, 2016.2019.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 89Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations


 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions$132,724
 $62,105
Deposits paid for securities borrowed27,573
 47,508
Receivable from clearing organizations3,293
 3,155
Deposits with clearing organizations35,713
 27,019
Securities failed to deliver975
 2,100
Other12,452
 6,062
Total receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$212,730
 $147,949

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Payable arising from unsettled securities transactions$13,948
 $34,445
Payable to clearing organizations15,893
 3,115
Securities failed to receive3,043
 4,468
Other7,958
 6,103
Total payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$40,842
 $48,131

Deposits paid for securities borrowed approximate the market value of the securities. Securities failed to deliver and receive represent the contract value of securities that have not been delivered or received by the Company on settlement date.

Note 9Receivables from and Payables to Customers

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Cash accounts$29,610
 $39,415
Margin accounts2,307
 1,752
Total receivables from customers$31,917
 $41,167

Securities owned by customers are held as collateral for margin loan receivables. This collateral is not reflected on the consolidated financial statements. Margin loan receivables earn interest at floating interest rates based on prime rates.

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Cash accounts$14,416
 $19,650
Margin accounts14,936
 17,714
Total payables to customers$29,352
 $37,364

Payables to customers primarily comprise cash balances in customer accounts consisting of customer funds pending settlement of securities transactions and customer funds on deposit. Except for amounts arising from customer short sales, all amounts payable to customers are subject to withdrawal by customers upon their request.

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Receivable from clearing organizations$260,436
 $223,987
Receivable from brokers and dealers19,161
 7,700
Other3,511
 3,591
Total receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$283,108
 $235,278
Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Note 10Collateralized Securities Transactions
 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Payable to brokers and dealers$7,514
 $3,923
Payable to clearing organizations
 4,734
Total payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$7,514
 $8,657



The Company’s financing and customer securities activities involveUnder the Company using securities as collateral. In the event that the counterparty does not meet its contractual obligation to return securities used as collateral (e.g., pursuant to the terms of a repurchase agreement), or customers do not deposit additional securities or cash for margin when required, the Company may be exposed to the risk of reacquiring the securities or selling the securities at unfavorable market prices in order to satisfy its obligations to its customers or counterparties. The Company seeks to control this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged or used as collateral on a daily basis and requiring adjustments in the event of excess market exposure. The Company also uses unaffiliated third party custodians to administer the underlying collateral forCompany's fully disclosed clearing agreement, the majority of its short-term financing to mitigate risk.

In a reverse repurchase agreement the Company purchases financial instruments from a seller, typically in exchange for cash,securities inventories and agrees to resell the sameall of its customer activities are held by or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest in the future. In a repurchase agreement, the Company sells financial instruments to a buyer, typically for cash, and agrees to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date. Even though repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments, they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at maturity of the agreement.

In a securities borrowed transaction, the Company borrows securities from a counterparty in exchange for cash. When the Company returns the securities, the counterparty returns the cash. Interest is generally paid periodically over the life of the transaction.

In the normal course of business, the Company obtains securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed and margin agreements on terms that permit it to repledge or resell the securities to others, typically pursuant to repurchase agreements.cleared through Pershing. The Company obtained securities with a fair value of approximately $192.2 million and $185.8 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of which $185.2 million and $175.8 million, respectively, had been pledged or otherwise transferredhas also established an arrangement to satisfy its commitments under financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased.

The following is a summary of the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase ("Repurchase Liabilities"), the fair market value of collateral pledged and the interest rate charged by the Company’s counterparty, which is based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin, as of December 31, 2016:
 Repurchase Fair Market  
(Dollars in thousands)Liabilities Value Interest Rate
On demand maturities:     
U.S. government agency securities$1,877
 $1,975
 0.80%
U.S. government securities15,046
 14,877
 0.00 - 0.25%
 $16,923
 $16,852
  

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned are reported on a net basis by counterparty when a legal right of offset exists. The following table provides information about the offsetting of these instruments and related collateral amounts at December 31, 2016:
    Gross Amount Net Amounts Gross Amounts Not Offset  
    Offset on the Presented on the on the Consolidated Statements  
  Gross Consolidated Consolidated of Financial Condition  
(Dollars in thousands) Recognized  Statements of  Statements of Financial Collateral Net
Description Assets Financial Condition Financial Condition  Instruments Received (1) Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements $161,574
 $(1,877) $159,697
 $
 $(159,697) $
Securities borrowed (3) 27,573
 
 27,573
 
 (27,573) 
    Gross Amount Net Amount Gross Amount Not Offset  
    Offset on the Presented on the on the Consolidated Statements  
  Gross Consolidated Consolidated of Financial Condition  
(Dollars in thousands) Recognized  Statements of  Statements of Financial Collateral Net
Description Liabilities Financial Condition Financial Condition  Instruments Pledged (2) Amount
Repurchase agreements $16,923
 $(1,877) $15,046
 $
 $(15,046) $
(1)Includes securities received by the Company from the counterparty. These securities are not included on the consolidated statements of financial condition unless there is an event of default.
(2)Includes the fair value of securities pledged by the Company to the counterparty. These securities are included on the consolidated statements of financial condition unless the Company defaults.
(3)Deposits paid for securities borrowed are included in receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the consolidated statements of financial condition. See Note 8 for additional information on receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations.

There were no gross amounts offset on the consolidated statements of financial condition for reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowed or repurchase agreements at December 31, 2015, as a legal right of offset did not exist. The Company had no outstanding securities lending arrangements as of December 31, 2016 or 2015. See Note 5 for informationobtain financing from Pershing related to the majority of its trading activities. Financing under this arrangement is secured primarily by securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under this arrangement. The funding is at the discretion of Pershing and could be denied. The Company's offsettingclearing arrangement activities are recorded net from trading activity. The Company's fully disclosed clearing agreement includes a covenant requiring Piper Sandler to maintain excess net capital of derivative contracts. $120 million.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – ContinuedNote 10Investments


Note 11Investments


The Company’sCompany's investments include investments in private companies and partnerships and investments in registered mutual funds, warrants of public and private companies and private company debt.funds.
December 31, December 31,December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 20152019 2018
Investments at fair value$156,102
 $144,318
$149,987
 $144,028
Investments at cost2,755
 3,299
1,084
 1,512
Investments accounted for under the equity method9,200
 17,781
7,070
 6,346
Total investments168,057
 165,398
158,141
 151,886
      
Less investments attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)(45,123) (41,008)(75,245) (52,972)
$122,934
 $124,390
$82,896
 $98,914
(1)Noncontrolling interests are attributable to third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds and private equity investment vehicles.funds.


At December 31, 20162019, investments carried on a cost basis had an estimated fair market value of $4.41.1 million. Because valuation estimates were based upon management’smanagement's judgment, investments carried at cost would be categorized as Level III assets in the fair value hierarchy, if they were carried at fair value.


Investments accounted for under the equity method include general and limited partnership interests. The carrying value of these investments is based on the investment vehicle’svehicle's net asset value. The net assets of investment partnerships consist of investments in both marketable and non-marketable securities. The underlying investments held by such partnerships are valued based on the estimated fair value determined by management in ourthe Company's capacity as general partner or investor and, in the case of investments in unaffiliated investment partnerships, are based on financial statements prepared by the unaffiliated general partners.


Note 1211Other Assets


 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Fee receivables$18,574
 $18,990
Accrued interest receivables2,977
 4,240
Income tax receivables2,658
 
Forgivable loans, net5,227
 7,152
Prepaid expenses10,687
 8,763
Other15,317
 7,298
Total other assets$55,440
 $46,443

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Net deferred income tax assets$97,833
 $66,810
Fee receivables22,840
 18,362
Accrued interest receivables9,259
 6,145
Forgivable loans, net9,307
 10,234
Prepaid expenses6,363
 6,161
Secured loan receivables6,236
 3,289
Other13,124
 6,664
Total other assets$164,962
 $117,665

See Note 25 for additional details concerning the Company's net deferred income tax assets.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Note 1312Goodwill and Intangible Assets


(Dollars in thousands) 
Goodwill 
Balance at December 31, 2017$81,855
Goodwill acquired
Balance at December 31, 2018$81,855
Goodwill acquired5,794
Balance at December 31, 2019$87,649
  
Intangible assets 
Balance at December 31, 2017$9,142
Intangible assets acquired
Amortization of intangible assets(4,858)
Balance at December 31, 2018$4,284
Intangible assets acquired16,700
Amortization of intangible assets(4,298)
Balance at December 31, 2019$16,686

 Capital Asset  
(Dollars in thousands)Markets Management  Total
Goodwill     
Balance at December 31, 2014$15,034
 $196,844
 $211,878
Goodwill acquired6,098
 
 6,098
Balance at December 31, 2015$21,132
 $196,844
 $217,976
Goodwill acquired60,723
 419
 61,142
Impairment charge
 (82,900) (82,900)
Balance at December 31, 2016$81,855
 $114,363
 $196,218
     
Intangible assets     
Balance at December 31, 2014$2,344
 $28,314
 $30,658
Intangible assets acquired7,534
 
 7,534
Amortization of intangible assets(1,622) (6,040) (7,662)
Balance at December 31, 2015$8,256
 $22,274
 $30,530
Intangible assets acquired26,651
 1,267
 27,918
Amortization of intangible assets(15,587) (5,627) (21,214)
Balance at December 31, 2016$19,320
 $17,914
 $37,234


The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis and on an interim basis when circumstances exist that could indicate possible impairment. The Company tests for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is generally one level below its operating segments. The Company has identified two1 reporting units: capital markets and asset management.unit: Capital Markets. When testing for impairment, the Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after making an assessment, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment testfurther analysis is unnecessary. However, if the Company concludes otherwise, then the Company is required to perform the two-step impairmenta quantitative goodwill test, which requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step requires a comparison ofquantitative goodwill test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including allocated goodwill. An impairment is recognized for the excess amount of a reporting unit's carrying value over its fair value. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is derived based on valuation techniques that a market participant would use. The Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and market approach (earnings and/or transaction multiples). If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying values, a second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. An impairment loss is equal to the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over its fair value.


The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysistesting as of October 31, 2016,2019, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $82.9 million. The charge relates to the asset management reporting unit and primarily pertains to goodwill created from the 2010 acquisition of ARI. The fair value of the asset management reporting unit was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method based on revenue and EBITDA forecasts) and market approach (earnings multiples of comparable public companies). The impairment charge resulted from net outflows of assets under management in 2016 as a result of an extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management, combined with certain investment strategies having performance below their benchmarks, which led to reduced management fees and profitability.0 impairment. The annual goodwill impairment testing for 2018 and 2017 resulted in no impairment associated with the capital marketsCapital Markets reporting unit.


The Company also evaluated its intangible assets (indefinite and definite-lived) and concluded there was no0 impairment in 2016. The Company concluded there was no goodwill or intangible asset impairment in 20152019, 2018 and 2014, respectively.2017 associated with the Capital Markets reporting unit.

The addition of goodwill and intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily2019 related to the acquisition of Simmons,Weeden & Co., as discussed in Note 4.5. Management identified $26.6$16.7 million of intangible assets, consisting of $12.0 million of customer relationships ($17.5 million) and the Simmons trade name ($9.1 million),$4.7 million of internally developed software, which will be amortized over a weighted average life of 1.68.4 years and 4.03.6 years, respectively.

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The addition of goodwill and intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the acquisitions of River Branch and BMO GKST, as discussed in Note 4. Management identified intangible assets consisting of customer relationships with acquisition-date fair values of $7.5 million, which are being amortized over a weighted average life of 2.1 years.


Intangible assets with determinable lives primarily consist of customer relationships and the Simmons trade name.internally developed software. The following table summarizes the future aggregate amortization expense of the Company's intangible assets with determinable lives forlives:
(Dollars in thousands) 
2020$4,246
20213,263
20222,416
20231,686
20241,368
Thereafter3,707
Total$16,686

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the years ended:Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 13Fixed Assets

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Furniture and equipment$44,018
 $43,554
Leasehold improvements39,714
 36,069
Software12,109
 11,604
Total95,841
 91,227
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(65,991) (58,927)
 $29,850
 $32,300

(Dollars in thousands) 
2017$15,289
20189,793
20197,779
20201,256
2021258
Total$34,375


Note 14Fixed Assets

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Furniture and equipment$37,712
 $31,953
Leasehold improvements31,982
 25,213
Software13,957
 13,692
Total83,651
 70,858
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(58,308) (51,874)
 $25,343
 $18,984

For the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017, depreciation and amortization of furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements and software totaled $6.49.3 million, $5.18.1 million and $5.37.0 million, respectively, and are included in occupancy and equipment expense from continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations.


Note 1514Short-Term Financing


 Outstanding Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate
 December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2016 2015
Commercial paper (secured)$147,021
 $276,894
 2.12% 1.74%
Prime broker arrangements271,811
 169,296
 1.49% 1.07%
Total short-term financing$418,832
 $446,190
    

The Company issues secured commercial paper to fund a portion of its securities inventory. The commercial paper notes ("CP Notes") can be issued with maturities of 27 days to 270 days from the date of issuance. The CP Notes are currently issued under three2 separate programs, CP Series A CP Series II A and CP Series IIIII A, and are secured by different inventory classes. As of December 31, 20162019, the weighted average maturity of outstanding CP Series A, CP Series II A and CP Series III ANotes was 45six days, 13 days and 15 days, respectively.. The CP Notes are interest bearing or sold at a discount to par with an interest rate based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. CP Series IIIII A includes a covenant that requires the Company’sCompany's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain excess net capital of $120$100 million.

The Company has established arrangements to obtain financinghad CP Notes of $50.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, with prime brokers related to its municipal bond fundweighted average interest rates of 2.69% and convertible securities. Financing under these arrangements is primarily secured by municipal securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under the arrangements. Prime broker financing activities are recorded net of receivables from trading activity.3.38%, respectively. The funding is at the discretion of the prime brokers subject to a notice period.CP Series A program was retired effective January 2, 2020.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The Company hasCompany's committed short-term bank line financing available onat December 31, 2019 consisted of a secured basis and uncommitted short-term bank line financing available on both a secured and unsecured basis.one-year $125 million committed revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A., which was renewed in December 2019. The Company uses thesethis credit facilitiesfacility in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of its daily operations and the amount borrowed under thesethis credit facilitiesfacility varies daily based on the Company’sCompany's funding needs.

The Company’s committed short-term bank line financing at December 31, 2016 consisted of a one-year $200 million committed revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A., which was renewed in December 2016. Advances under this facility are secured by certain marketable securities. The facility includes a covenant that requires the Company’sCompany's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain a minimum regulatory net capital of $120 million, and the unpaid principal amount of all advances under this facility will be due on December 16, 2017.11, 2020. The Company pays a nonrefundable commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 20162019, the Company had no0 advances against this line of credit.


On December 20, 2019, Piper Sandler Companies entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with U.S. Bank, N.A., which created an unsecured $50 million revolving credit facility. The Company’s uncommitted secured linesCredit Agreement will terminate on December 20, 2022, unless otherwise terminated, and is subject to a one-year extension exercisable at the option of the Company. At December 31, 2016 totaled $185 million with two banks2019, there were 0 advances against this credit facility.

The Credit Agreement includes customary events of default and are dependentcovenants that, among other things, require the Company's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain a minimum regulatory net capital, limit the Company's leverage ratio, require maintenance of a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges, and impose certain limitations on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement,Company's ability to secure an advance undermake acquisitions and make payments on its capital stock.

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the line. The availability of the Company’s uncommitted lines are subject to approval by the individual banks each time an advance is requested and may be denied. At December 31, 2016,Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 15Senior Notes

On October 15, 2019, the Company had no advances against these lines of credit.

Note 16Senior Notes

The Company has entered into variable and fixed rate senior notesa note purchase agreement ("Note Purchase Agreement") with certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company ("PIMCO"). The following table presents the outstanding balance by note class:

 Outstanding Balance
 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Class A Notes$50,000
 $50,000
Class C Notes125,000
 125,000
Total senior notes$175,000
 $175,000

On October 8, 2015, the Company entered into a second amended and restated note purchase agreement ("Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement"), under which the Company issued unsecured fixed rate senior notes ("Notes") in the amount of $175 million. The Notes consist of two classes, Class A Notes and Class B Notes, with principal amounts of $50 million and $125 million, of fixed rate Class C Notes.respectively. The Class CA Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.064.74 percent payable semi-annually and mature on October 9, 2018.15, 2021. The variable rate Class AB Notes bear interest at aan annual fixed rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.00of 5.20 percent adjusted and payable quarterly and mature on May 31, 2017.October 15, 2023. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually. The unpaid principal amounts are due in full on the respective maturity dates and may not be prepaid by the Company.


The Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement includes customary events of default and covenants that, among other things, require the CompanyCompany's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and regulatory net capital, limit the Company's leverage ratio and require the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges. At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.


The senior notes are recorded at amortized cost. As ofcost which approximates fair value at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the variable rate Class A Notes approximated fair value. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the fixed rate Class C Notes was approximately $126.5 million.2019.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 1716Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees


Legal Contingencies


The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including complaints and litigation and arbitration claims, arising from its business activities. Such actions include claims related to securities brokerage and investment banking activities, and certain class actions that primarily allege violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. Also, the Company is involved from time to time in investigations and proceedings by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations ("SROs") which could result in adverse judgments, settlement, penalties, fines or other relief.


The Company has established reserves for potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from pending and potential legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings. Reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts accrued at December 31, 20162019 are not material. In many cases, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount or range of any potential loss, particularly where proceedings may be in relatively early stages or where plaintiffs are seeking substantial or indeterminate damages. Matters frequently need to be more developed before a loss or range of loss can reasonably be estimated.


Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, volume and outcome of pending and potential legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves and ranges of reasonably possible losses are difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing, management of the Company believes, based on currently available information, after consultation with outside legal counsel and taking into account its established reserves, that pending legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on the consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, if during any period a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the established reserves, the results of operations and cash flows in that period and the financial condition as of the end of that period could be materially adversely affected. In addition, there can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that have not yet been brought to the Company’sCompany's attention or are not yet determined to be reasonably possible.


Litigation-related reserve activity included within other operating expenses resulted in expense of $0.3 million, $9.7 million (primarily related to a municipal derivatives class action settlement paid in 2016), and $0.8 millionfrom continuing operations was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014, respectively.2017.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Operating Lease Commitments


The Company leases office space throughout the United States and in a limited number of foreign countries where the Company’sCompany's international operations reside. Aggregate minimum lease commitments underon an undiscounted basis for the Company's operating leases (including short-term leases) as of December 31, 2016 are2019 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 
2020$17,245
202112,698
202211,324
20238,311
20246,550
Thereafter10,860
Total$66,988

(Dollars in thousands) 
2017$14,629
201813,601
201911,857
202011,307
20217,040
Thereafter20,006
Total$78,440


Total minimum rentals to be received from 20172020 through 20212024 under noncancelable subleases were $4.7$2.2 million at December 31, 2016.2019.


RentalFor the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company's operating lease cost from continuing operations was $12.1 million, of which $0.7 million related to short-term leases. The Company recorded sublease income from continuing operations of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Rent expense including operating costsfrom continuing operations was $12.7 million and real estate taxes, was $17.3$11.8 million, $13.7 million and $13.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


FundInvestment Commitments


As of December 31, 20162019, the Company had commitments to invest approximately $22.8$71.0 million in limited partnerships or limited liability companies that make direct or indirect equity or debt investments in private equity companies or provide financing for senior living facilities.companies.


Other Guarantees


The Company is a member of numerous exchanges and clearinghouses.exchanges. Under the membership agreements with these entities, members generally are required to guarantee the performance of other members, and if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearinghouse,exchange, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. To mitigate these performance risks, the exchanges and clearinghouses often require members to post collateral. In addition, the Company identifies and guarantees certain clearing agents against specified potential losses in connection with providing services to the Company or its affiliates. The Company’sCompany's maximum potential liability under these arrangements cannot be quantified. However, management believes the likelihood that the Company would be required to make payments under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no0 liability is recorded in the consolidated statements of financial statementscondition for these arrangements.


Concentration of Credit Risk


The Company provides investment, capital-raising and related services to a diverse group of domestic and foreign customers, including governments, corporations, and institutional and individual investors. The Company’sCompany's exposure to credit risk associated with the non-performance of customers in fulfilling their contractual obligations pursuant to securities transactions can be directly impacted by volatile securities markets, credit markets and regulatory changes. This exposure is measured on an individual customer basis and on a group basis for customers that share similar attributes. To alleviate the potential for risk concentrations, counterparty credit limits have been implemented for certain products and are continually monitored in light of changing customer and market conditions.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 1817Restructuring and Integration Costs


The Company incurred restructuring costs from continuing operations for the following pre-tax restructuring charges within the Capital Markets segmentyear ended December 31, 2019, primarily in conjunction with its acquisition of Weeden & Co. The Company incurred restructuring costs from continuing operations for the acquisitionsyear ended December 31, 2018, primarily related to headcount reductions. The Company incurred integration costs from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, related to the acquisition of Simmons, River BranchWeeden & Co., which closed on August 2, 2019, and BMO GKST discussed in Note 4.the acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, which closed on January 3, 2020.
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Severance, benefits and outplacement costs $2,938
 $3,183
 $
Contract termination costs 2,798
 185
 
Vacated leased office space 1,726
 130
 
Total restructuring costs 7,462
 3,498
 
       
Integration costs 6,859
 
 
       
Total restructuring and integration costs $14,321
 $3,498
 $

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Severance, benefits and outplacement costs$6,608
 $8,806
Vacated redundant leased office space1,320
 
Contract termination costs1,026
 546
Total pre-tax restructuring charges$8,954
 $9,352


Note 19Shareholders’18Shareholders' Equity


The Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Piper Jaffray Companies provides for the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.


Common Stock


The holders of Piper Jaffray Companiesthe Company's common stock are entitled to one1 vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the shareholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding preferred stock of Piper JaffraySandler Companies, the holders of its common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Piper Jaffray Companies board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. Piper Jaffray Companies did not payThere are also restrictions on the payment of dividends as set forth in Note 23. The Company's board of directors determines the declaration and payment of dividends on a quarterly basis, and is free to change the Company's dividend policy at any time.

Dividends

The Company's current dividend policy includes both a quarterly and an annual special cash dividend. The annual special cash dividend is payable in the first quarter of each year, beginning in 2018, with the intention of returning a metric based on net income from the previous fiscal year.

In 2019, the Company declared and paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock, in 2016, 2015 or 2014. Beginning inaggregating $1.50 per share, and an annual special cash dividend on its common stock related to fiscal year 2018 results of $1.01 per share, totaling $35.6 million.

In 2018, the Company declared and paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock, aggregating $1.50 per share, and an annual special cash dividend on its common stock related to fiscal year 2017 results of $1.62 per share, totaling $47.2 million.

In 2017, the Company is initiatingdeclared and paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock, aggregating $1.25 per share, totaling $19.0 million.

On January 31, 2020, the paymentboard of directors declared both a quarterly and annual special cash dividend to holders ofon its common stock. Additionally, there are dividend restrictionsstock of $0.38 and $0.75 per share, respectively, to be paid on March 13, 2020, to shareholders of record as set forth in Note 24.of the close of business on March 2, 2020.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




In the event that Piper JaffraySandler Companies is liquidated or dissolved, the holders of its common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to any prior distribution rights of Piper JaffraySandler Companies preferred stock, if any, then outstanding. Currently, there is no0 outstanding preferred stock. The holders of the common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to Piper JaffraySandler Companies common stock.


Share Repurchases


Effective September 30, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares, which expired on September 30, 2019. In 2019, the Company repurchased 501 shares at an average price of $64.80 per share related to this authorization. In 2018, the Company repurchased 681,233 shares at an average price of $69.20 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $47.1 million related to this authorization.

Effective August 14, 2015, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016,In 2017, the Company repurchased 1,536,22636,936 shares at an average price of $38.89$67.62 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $59.7$2.5 million related to this authorization. The Company has $71.8

On November 15, 2019, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million remaining under this authorization. During the year endedin common shares. This authorization will be effective from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased 2,459,400 shares at an average price of $48.17 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $118.5 million related to the August 2015 and prior authorizations. The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Company's outstanding common stock during the year ended December 31, 2014.2021.


The Company also purchases shares of common stock from restricted stock award recipients upon the award vesting or as recipients sell shares to meet their employment tax obligations. The Company purchased 261,685701,217 shares or $11.1 million, 281,180$50.6 million; 279,664 shares or $14.5 million$23.8 million; and 256,055314,542 shares or $10.9$23.0 million of the Company’sCompany's common stock for this purposethese purposes during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Issuance of Shares


The Company issues common shares out of treasury stock as a result of employee restricted share vesting and exercise transactions as discussed in Note 21.20. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company issued 854,4161,415,147 shares, 784,7511,040,015 shares and 1,030,249867,327 shares, respectively, related to these obligations. The Company also issued common shares out of treasury stock related to obligations under the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 103,598 shares or $4.2 million out of treasury stock in fulfillment of these obligations.


Preferred Stock


The Piper JaffraySandler Companies board of directors has the authority, without action by its shareholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each series, which may be greater than the rights associated with the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of holders of common stock until the Piper JaffraySandler Companies board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, the following: restricting dividends on its common stock, diluting the voting power of its common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of its common stock and delaying or preventing a change in control of Piper JaffraySandler Companies without further action by its shareholders.


Noncontrolling Interests


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper JaffraySandler Companies, its wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interests represent equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper JaffraySandler Companies. Noncontrolling interests include the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in a merchant banking fundfunds of $35.0 million, a municipal bond fund with employee investors of $9.2$72.7 million and a senior living fund aggregating $12.8of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2016.2019. As of December 31, 2015,2018, noncontrolling interests included the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in a merchant banking funds of $50.2 million and a senior living fund of $31.8 million, a municipal bond fund with employee investors of $7.0 million and private investment vehicles aggregating $10.4$2.8 million.

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued





Ownership interests in entities held by parties other than the Company’sCompany's common shareholders are presented as noncontrolling interests within shareholders’shareholders' equity, separate from the Company’sCompany's own equity. Revenues, expenses and net income or loss are reported on the consolidated statements of operations on a consolidated basis, which includes amounts attributable to both the Company’sCompany's common shareholders and noncontrolling interests. Net income or loss is then allocated between the Company and noncontrolling interests based upon their relative ownership interests. Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests is deducted from consolidated net income to determine net income applicable to the Company. There was no0 other comprehensive income or loss attributed to noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Note 2019Employee Benefit Plans


The Company has various employee benefit plans, and substantially all employees are covered by at least one plan. The plans include health and welfare plans and a tax-qualified retirement plan (the "Retirement Plan"). During the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017, the Company incurred employee benefits expenses from continuing operations of $17.6$18.4 million,, $15.1 $18.1 million and $13.2$18.8 million,, respectively.


Health and Welfare Plans


Company employees who meet certain work schedule and service requirements are eligible to participate in the Company’sCompany's health and welfare plans. The Company subsidizes the cost of coverage for employees. The health plans contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance.


The Company is self-insured for losses related to health claims, although it obtains third party stop loss insurance coverage on both an individual and a group plan basis. Self-insured liabilities are based on a number of factors, including historical claims experience, an estimate of claims incurred but not reported and valuations provided by third party actuaries. For the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017, the Company recognized expense of $10.4$10.6 million,, $9.1 $10.7 million and $7.7$11.3 million,, respectively, in compensation and benefits expense from continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations related to its health plans.


Retirement Plan


The Retirement Plan consists of a defined contribution retirement savings plan. The defined contribution retirement savings plan allows qualified employees, at their option, to make contributions through salary deductions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employee contributions are 100 percent matched by the Company to a maximum of six6 percent of recognized compensation up to the social security taxable wage base. Although the Company’sCompany's matching contribution vests immediately, a participant must be employed on December 31 to receive that year’syear's matching contribution.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Note 2120Compensation Plans


Stock-Based Compensation Plans


The Company maintains twohas 3 outstanding stock-based compensation plans,plans: the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") and, the 20162019 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the "Inducement"Weeden & Co. Inducement Plan") and the 2020 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the "Sandler O'Neill Inducement Plan"). The Company’sCompany's equity awards are recognized on the consolidated statements of operations at grant date fair value over the service period of the award, net of estimatedless forfeitures.


The following table provides a summary of the Company’sCompany's outstanding equity awards (in shares or units) as of December 31, 2016:2019:
Incentive Plan 
Restricted Stock 
Annual grants1,309,440463,110

Sign-on grants280,945133,363

 1,590,385596,473

Weeden & Co. Inducement Plan 
Restricted Stock269,49197,752
Total restricted stock related to compensation1,859,876
Simmons Deal Consideration (1)1,014,241

  
Total restricted stock outstanding2,874,117694,225

  
Incentive Plan 
Restricted Stock Units 
Market condition leadershipLeadership grants374,460114,315

  
Incentive Plan 
Stock Options30,61381,667

(1)The Company issued restricted stock with service conditions as part of deal consideration for the acquisition of Simmons. See Note 4 for further discussion.



Incentive Plan


The Incentive Plan permits the grant of equity awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options, to the Company’sCompany's employees and directors for up to 8.2 million shares of common stock (0.9(0.7 million shares remained available for future issuance under the Incentive Plan as of December 31, 20162019). The Company believes that such awards help align the interests of employees and directors with those of shareholders and serve as an employee retention tool. The Incentive Plan provides for accelerated vesting of awards if there is a severance event, a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Incentive Plan), in the event of a participant’sparticipant's death, and at the discretion of the compensation committee of the Company’sCompany's board of directors.


Restricted Stock Awards


Restricted stock grants are valued at the market price of the Company’sCompany's common stock on the date of grant and are amortized over the requisite service period. The Company grants shares of restricted stock to employees as part of year-end compensation ("Annual Grants") and upon initial hiring or as a retention award ("Sign-on Grants").


The Company’sCompany's Annual Grants are made each year in February. Annual Grants vest ratably over three years in equal installments. The Annual Grants provide for continued vesting after termination of employment, so long as the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions set forth in the award agreement or any agreements entered into upon termination. The Company determined the service inception date precedes the grant date for the Annual Grants, and that the post-termination restrictions do not meet the criteria for an in-substance service condition, as defined by ASC 718. Accordingly, restricted stock granted as part
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


of the Annual Grants is expensed in the one-yearone-year period in which those awards are deemed to be earned, which is generally the calendar year preceding the February grant date. For example, the Company recognized compensation expense during fiscal 2016year 2019 for its February 20172020 Annual Grant. If an equity award related to the Annual Grants is forfeited as a result of violating the post-termination restrictions, the lower of the fair value of the award at grant date or the fair value of the award at the date of forfeiture is recorded within the consolidated statements of operations as a reversal of compensation expense.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Sign-on Grants are used as a recruiting tool for new employees and are issued to current employees as a retention tool. These awards have both cliff and ratable vesting terms, and the employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for rights to the awards. Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis from the grant date over the requisite service period, generally onethree to five years. Employees forfeit unvested shares upon termination of employment and a reversal of compensation expense is recorded.


Annually, the Company grants stock to its non-employee directors. The stock-based compensation paid to non-employee directors is fully expensed on the grant date and included within outside services expense on the consolidated statements of operations.


Restricted Stock Units


The Company grants restricted stock units to its leadership team ("Leadership Grants"). The

Leadership Grants Subsequent to 2016

Restricted stock units granted in each of the years subsequent to 2016 will vest and convert to shares of common stock at the end of each 36-month36-month performance period only if the Company's stockCompany satisfies predetermined performance satisfies predeterminedand/or market conditions over the performance period. Under the terms of the grants,these awards, the number of units that will actually vest and convert to shares will be based on the Company's stock performance achievingextent to which the Company achieves specified targets during each performance periodperiod. The maximum payout leverage under these grants is 150 percent.

Up to 75 percent of the award can be earned based on the Company achieving certain average adjusted return on equity targets, as described below. Compensationdefined in the terms of the award agreements. The fair value of this portion of the award was based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. If the Company determines that it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved, compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year requisite service36-month performance period. The probability that the performance condition will be achieved is reevaluated each reporting period with changes in estimated outcomes accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment to compensation expense. Compensation expense will be recognized only if the performance condition is met. Employees forfeit unvested restricted stock units upon termination of employment with a corresponding reversal of compensation expense. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has determined that the probability of achieving the performance condition for each award is as follows:
Grant Year Probability of Achieving Performance Condition
2019 62%
2018 50%
2017 75%


Up to 75 percent of the award can be earned based on the fair valueCompany's total shareholder return relative to members of the award on the grant date.a predetermined peer group. The market condition must be met for the awards to vest and compensation cost will be recognized regardless if the market condition is satisfied. Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the 36-month requisite service period. Employees forfeit unvested sharerestricted stock units upon termination of employment with a corresponding reversal of compensation expense.

Up to 50 percent For this portion of the award can be earned based onawards, the Company’s total shareholder return relative to members of a predetermined peer group and up to 50 percent of the award can be earned based on the Company’s total shareholder return. The fair value of the awards on the grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions:
  Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility
2019 2.50% 31.9%
2018 2.40% 34.8%
2017 1.62% 35.9%

  Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility
2016 0.98% 34.9%
2015 0.90% 29.8%
2014 0.82% 41.3%


Because athe market condition portion of the awardawards vesting dependsdepend on the Company’sCompany's total shareholder return relative to a peer group, the valuation modeled the performance of the peer group as well as the correlation between the Company and the peer group. The expected stock price volatility assumptions were determined using historical volatility, as correlation coefficients can only be developed through historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates were determined based on three-yearthree-year U.S. Treasury bond yields.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The compensation committee of the Company's board of directors included defined retirement provisions in its Leadership Grants, beginning with the February 2018 grant. Certain grantees meeting defined age and service requirements will be fully vested in the awards as long as performance and post-termination obligations are met throughout the performance period. These retirement-eligible grants are expensed in the period in which those awards are deemed to be earned, which is the calendar year preceding the February grant date.

2016 Leadership Grant

Restricted stock units granted in 2016 contain market condition criteria and convert to shares of common stock at the end of the 36-month performance period only if the Company's stock performance satisfies predetermined market conditions over the performance period. Under the terms of the award, the number of units that vested and converted to shares was based on the Company's stock performance achieving specified targets during the performance period. All units vested in full. Compensation expense was recognized over the 36-month performance period which ended in May 2019.

Up to 50 percent of the award was earned based on the Company's total shareholder return relative to members of a predetermined peer group and up to 50 percent of the award was earned based on the Company's total shareholder return. The fair value of the award on the grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions pursuant to the methodology above:
  Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility
2016 0.98% 34.9%


Stock Options


TheOn February 15, 2018, the Company previously granted options to purchase Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to employees and non-employee directors in fiscal years 2004 through 2008. Employee and directorcertain executive officers. These options wereare expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis over the required service period of five years, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As described above pertaininggrant. The exercise price per share is equal to the Company’s Annual Grantsclosing price on the date of restricted shares, stockgrant plus 10 percent. These options grantedare subject to employees were expensed ingraded vesting, beginning on the calendar year precedingthird anniversary of the annual February grant date. For example,date, so long as the Company recognized compensation expense during fiscal 2007 for its February 2008 option grant.employee remains continuously employed by the Company. The maximum term of thethese stock options granted to employees and directors is ten years.

The Company has not grantedfair value of this stock options since 2008.option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate2.82%
Dividend yield3.22%
Expected stock price volatility37.20%
Expected life of options (in years)7.0
Fair value of options granted (per share)$24.49

Piper Jaffray Companies
NotesThe risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield with a maturity equal to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continuedexpected life of the options. The dividend yield assumption was based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the options. The expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using historical volatility, as correlation coefficients can only be developed through historical volatility.



Inducement PlanPlans


The Company established the 2016 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the "Simmons Inducement Plan") in conjunction with the acquisition of Simmons. The Company granted $11.6 million (286,776 shares) in restricted stock under the Simmons Inducement Plan on May 15,16, 2016. TheseSimmons Inducement Plan awards were amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. All outstanding shares cliff vestvested on May 16, 2019. The Company terminated the Simmons Inducement Plan in three years.July 2019.

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The Company established the Weeden & Co. Inducement Plan in conjunction with its acquisition of Weeden & Co. On August 2, 2019, the Company granted $7.3 million (97,752 shares) in restricted stock. These restricted shares are subject to graded vesting, generally beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date through August 2, 2023. Weeden & Co. Inducement Plan awards are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Employees forfeit unvested Inducement Plan shares upon termination of employment and a reversal of compensation expense is recorded.


The Company established the Sandler O'Neill Inducement Plan in conjunction with its acquisition of Sandler O'Neill. On January 3, 2020, the Company granted $96.9 million (1,217,423 shares) in restricted stock.

Stock-Based Compensation Activity


The Company recorded compensation expense of $53.7 million, $48.2 million and $28.2 million forfollowing table summarizes the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to employee restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. Forfeitures were $1.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The tax benefit related toCompany's stock-based compensation costs totaled $14.0 million, $18.8 million and $11.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.activity within continuing operations:

  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2019 2018 2017
Stock-based compensation expense $30.8
 $43.2
 $39.2
Forfeitures 2.6
 0.9
 3.0
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense 5.4
 6.9
 9.8


The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted stock:
Unvested Weighted AverageUnvested Weighted Average
Restricted Stock Grant DateRestricted Stock Grant Date
(in Shares) Fair Value (in Shares) Fair Value 
December 31, 20131,582,062
 $35.25
December 31, 20162,874,117
 $43.12
Granted421,728
 40.57
248,749
 77.78
Vested(883,761) 36.22
(717,782) 45.08
Canceled(24,724) 36.02
(179,467) 42.70
December 31, 20141,095,305
 $36.51
December 31, 20172,225,617
 $46.40
Granted783,758
 51.08
310,494
 88.18
Vested(575,716) 34.72
(945,550) 47.65
Canceled(15,432) 40.83
(20,766) 54.53
December 31, 20151,287,915
 $46.20
December 31, 20181,569,795
 $53.80
Granted2,359,672
 41.87
463,088
 74.05
Vested(623,961) 44.89
(1,306,844) 47.30
Canceled(149,509) 42.49
(31,814) 76.20
December 31, 20162,874,117
 $43.12
December 31, 2019694,225
 $78.52


The fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 was $28.061.8 million, $20.045.1 million and $32.032.4 million, respectively.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted stock units:
 Unvested Weighted Average
 Restricted Grant Date
 Stock Units Fair Value
December 31, 2016374,460
 $21.63
Granted35,981
 84.10
Vested(115,290) 23.42
Canceled(50,379) 31.73
December 31, 2017244,772
 $27.89
Granted53,796
 92.93
Vested(86,511) 21.83
Canceled(17,806) 23.91
December 31, 2018194,251
 $48.97
Granted39,758
 75.78
Vested(103,707) 19.93
Canceled(15,987) 45.79
December 31, 2019114,315
 $85.09
 Unvested Weighted Average
 Restricted Grant Date
 Stock Units Fair Value      
December 31, 2013290,536
 $15.83
Granted115,290
 23.42
Vested
 
Canceled
 
December 31, 2014405,826
 $17.99
Granted123,687
 21.83
Vested(149,814) 12.12
Canceled(23,457) 12.12
December 31, 2015356,242
 $22.18
Granted135,483
 19.93
Vested(117,265) 21.32
Canceled
 
December 31, 2016374,460
 $21.63

 
As of December 31, 20162019, there was $46.014.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock and restricted stock units expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.13.1 years.


The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's outstanding stock options:
     Weighted Average  
   Weighted Remaining  
 Options Average Contractual Term Aggregate
 Outstanding Exercise Price  (in Years) Intrinsic Value
December 31, 201630,613
 $65.86
 0.3 $203,291
Granted
 
    
Exercised(26,149) 65.13
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired(4,464) 70.13
    
December 31, 2017
 $
 0.0 $
Granted81,667
 99.00
    
Exercised
 
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired
 
    
December 31, 201881,667
 $99.00
 9.1 $
Granted
 
    
Exercised
 
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired
 
    
December 31, 201981,667
 $99.00
 8.1 $

     Weighted Average  
   Weighted Remaining  
 Options Average Contractual Term Aggregate
 Outstanding Exercise Price      (in Years) Intrinsic Value
December 31, 2013469,289
 $44.83
 2.0 $288,318
Granted
 
    
Exercised(137,864) 39.55
    
Canceled(55) 39.62
    
Expired(113,497) 47.72
    
December 31, 2014217,873
 $46.66
 2.0 $3,066,839
Granted
 
    
Exercised(50,671) 36.62
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired(10,001) 39.62
    
December 31, 2015157,201
 $50.35
 1.6 $
Granted
 
    
Exercised(104,175) 43.75
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired(22,413) 59.83
    
December 31, 201630,613
 $65.86
 0.3 $203,291
        
Options exercisable at December 31, 2014217,873
 $46.66
 2.0 $3,066,839
Options exercisable at December 31, 2015157,201
 $50.35
 1.6 $
Options exercisable at December 31, 201630,613
 $65.86
 0.3 $203,291


Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Additional information regarding Piper Jaffray Companies options outstanding asAs of December 31, 2016 is as follows:
  Options Outstanding Exercisable Options
    Weighted Average      
    Remaining Weighted   Weighted
Range of   Contractual Average   Average
Exercise Prices Shares Life (in Years) Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
$41.09 4,502
 1.1 $41.09
 4,502
 $41.09
$70.13 26,111
 0.1 $70.13
 26,111
 $70.13

As of December 31, 20162019, there was no$1.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected to be recognized over futurea weighted average period of 3.1 years. The intrinsic value ofThere were 0 exercisable options exercised andduring the resulting tax benefit realized was $2.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016.2019 and 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the intrinsic value of options exercised and the resulting tax benefit realized was $0.9$0.3 million and $0.3$0.1 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the intrinsic value of options exercised and the resulting tax benefit realized was $1.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.


The Company has a policy of issuing shares out of treasury (to the extent available) to satisfy share option exercises and restricted stock vesting. The Company expects to withhold approximately 0.30.1 million shares from employee equity awards vesting in 2017,2020, related to employee individual income tax withholding obligations on restricted stock vesting. For accounting purposes, withholding shares to cover employees’employees' tax obligations is deemed to be a repurchase of shares by the Company.


Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Acquisition-related Compensation Arrangements

The Company entered into acquisition-related compensation arrangements with certain employees for retention and incentive purposes. Additional cash compensation was available to certain employees subject to exceeding an investment banking revenue threshold during the three year Simmons post-acquisition period, which ended on February 26, 2019. The Company accrued $40.1 million related to this performance award plan, which was paid in August 2019. Amounts payable related to this performance award plan were recorded as compensation expense from continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite performance period of three years. The Company recorded $0.6 million, $8.9 million and $27.0 million as compensation expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plans


The Company maintains various deferred compensation arrangements for employees.


The nonqualified deferred compensation plan is an unfunded plan which allows certain highly compensated employees, at their election, to defer a percentage of their base salary, commissions and/or cash bonuses. The deferrals vest immediately and are non-forfeitable. The amounts deferred under this plan are held in a grantor trust. The Company invests, as a principal, in investments to economically hedge its obligation under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Investments in the grantor trust, consisting of mutual funds, totaled $24.4 million and $14.6 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The compensation deferred by the employees is expensed in the period earned. The deferred compensation liability was $24.5 million and $14.5 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Changes in the fair value of the investments made by the Company are reported in investment income and changes in the corresponding deferred compensation liability are reflected as compensation and benefits expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Piper Jaffray Companies Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan is a fully funded deferred compensation plan which allows eligible employees to elect to receive a portion of thetheir incentive compensation they would otherwise receive in the form of restricted stock, instead in restricted mutual fund shares ("MFRS Awards") of investment funds. MFRS Awards are awarded to qualifying employees in February of each year, and represent a portion of their compensation for performance in the preceding year similar to the Company's Annual Grants. MFRS Awards vest ratably over three years in equal installments and provide for continued vesting after termination of employment so long as the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions set forth in the award agreement or any agreement entered into upon termination. Forfeitures are recorded as a reduction of compensation and benefits expense within the consolidated statements of operations. MFRS Awards are owned by employee recipients (subject to the aforementioned vesting restrictions) and as such are not included on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company has also granted MFRS Awards to new employees as a recruiting tool. Employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for rights to the awards. Compensation expense from these awards will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of two to five years.


The Company recorded compensation expense from continuing operations of $17.5$45.5 million, $26.6$50.2 million and $20.0$60.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, related to employee MFRS Awards. Total compensation cost includes year-end compensation for MFRS Awards and the amortization of sign-on MFRS Awards, less forfeitures. Forfeitures were immaterial$3.3 million, $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Piper Jaffray CompaniesThe nonqualified deferred compensation plan is an unfunded plan which allowed certain highly compensated employees, at their election, to defer a portion of their compensation. In 2017, this plan was closed to future deferral elections by participants for performance periods beginning after December 31, 2017. The amounts deferred under this plan are held in a grantor trust. The Company invests, as a principal, in investments to economically hedge its obligation under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Investments in the grantor trust, consisting of mutual funds, totaled $16.7 million and $31.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and are included in investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The compensation deferred by the employees was expensed in the period earned. The deferred compensation liability was $16.7 million and $31.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Changes in the fair value of the investments made by the Company are reported in investment income and changes in the corresponding deferred compensation liability are reflected as compensation and benefits expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 2221Earnings Per Share("EPS")


The Company calculates earnings per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Sandler Companies' common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Sandler Companies' common shareholders represents net income/(loss) applicable to Piper JaffraySandler Companies reduced by the allocation of earnings to participating securities. LossesNo allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Distributed earnings (e.g., dividends) are not allocated to participating securities. AllPrior to the February 2019 Annual Grant (the "2019 Annual Grant"), all of the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted shares are deemed to be participating securities as they are eligible to share in the profits (e.g., receive dividends) of the Company. The Company’sCompany's unvested restricted stock units, as well as the 2019 restricted stock grants, are not participating securities as they are not eligible to share inreceive dividends, or the profits of the Company.dividends are forfeitable until vested. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options, and restricted stock units.units and non-participating restricted shares.

Piper Sandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


The computation of earnings per share is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
Earnings allocated to participating securities (1)
 (4,015) (5,031)
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’ common shareholders (2)$(21,952) $48,060
 $58,141
      
Shares for basic and diluted calculations:     
Average shares used in basic computation12,674
 14,368
 14,971
Stock options15
 21
 54
Restricted stock units90
 
 
Average shares used in diluted computation12,779
(3)14,389
 15,025
      
Earnings/(loss) per common share:     
Basic$(1.73) $3.34
 $3.88
Diluted$(1.73)(3)$3.34
 $3.87
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017
Net income from continuing operations applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$87,939
 $55,649
 $23,121
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations23,772
 1,387
 (85,060)
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies111,711
 57,036
 (61,939)
Earnings allocated to participating securities (1)(4,511) (7,043) (2,936)
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies' common shareholders (2)$107,200
 $49,993
 $(64,875)
      
Shares for basic and diluted calculations:     
Average shares used in basic computation13,555
 13,234
 12,807
Restricted stock units162
 191
 171
Non-participating restricted shares220
 
 
Average shares used in diluted computation (3)13,937
 13,425
 12,978
      
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share:     
Income from continuing operations$6.21
 $3.68
 $1.57
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations1.69
 0.09
 (6.64)
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share$7.90
 $3.78
 $(5.07)
      
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share:     
Income from continuing operations$6.05
 $3.63
 $1.57
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations1.65
 0.09
 (6.55)
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share (3)$7.69
 $3.72
 $(4.99)
(1)
Represents the allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities. LossesNo allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Distributed earnings (e.g., dividends) are not allocated to participating securities. Participating securities include all of the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted shares.shares issued prior to the 2019 Annual Grant. The weighted average participating shares outstanding were 2,691,728513,220; 1,201,6101,868,883; and 1,299,8272,349,476 for the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
(2)Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Sandler Companies' common shareholders for diluted and basic EPS may differ under the two-class method as a result of adding the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options, restricted stock units and non-participating restricted shares to dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate earnings to Piper Jaffray Companies’Sandler Companies' common shareholders and participating securities for purposes of calculating diluted and basic EPS.
(3)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred. 2,874,117 commonincurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Common shares of 2,225,617 were excluded from diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2017, as the Company had a net loss for the year.this period.


The average shares used in the diluted computation excluded anti-dilutive stock options and non-participating restricted shares of 0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The anti-dilutive effects from stock options, and restricted stock units and non-participating restricted shares were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018 and 2014.2017.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Note 23Segment Reporting22Revenues and Business Information

Basis for Presentation


The Company structures its segments primarily based upon the nature of the financial productsCompany's activities as an investment bank and services provided to customers and the Company’s management organization. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on segment pre-tax operating income or loss and segment pre-tax operating margin. Revenues and expenses directly associated with each respective segment are included in determining their operating results. Other revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable toinstitutional securities firm constitute a particular segment are allocated based upon the Company’s allocation methodologies, including each segment’s respective net revenues, use of shared resources, headcount or other relevant measures. Segment assets are based on those directly associated with each segment, and include an allocation of certain assets based on the most relevant measures applicable, including headcount and other factors.single business segment. The substantial majority of the Company's net revenues and long-lived assets are located in the U.S.


Segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin exclude the results of discontinued operations.

Reportable segment financial results from continuing operations are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Capital Markets          
Investment banking          
Financing     
Equities$71,161
 $114,468
 $109,706
Debt115,013
 91,195
 63,005
Advisory services304,654
 209,163
 197,880
$440,695
 $394,133
 $443,303
Equity financing104,563
 122,172
 98,996
Debt financing85,701
 73,262
 93,434
Total investment banking490,828
 414,826
 370,591
630,959
 589,567
 635,733
          
Institutional sales and trading          
Equities87,992
 78,584
 82,211
88,792
 77,477
 81,717
Fixed income91,466
 94,305
 92,200
94,922
 67,784
 89,609
Total institutional sales and trading179,458
 172,889
 174,411
183,714
 145,261
 171,326
          
Management and performance fees6,363
 4,642
 5,398
     
Investment income24,791
 24,468
 24,046
23,093
 11,918
 24,238
          
Long-term financing expenses(9,136) (7,494) (6,655)
Other financing expenses(3,200) (5,793) (7,676)
          
Net revenues692,304
 609,331
 567,791
834,566
 740,953
 823,621
          
Operating expenses (1)645,863
 530,937
 478,661
715,587
 668,464
 744,305
          
Segment pre-tax operating income$46,441
 $78,394
 $89,130
$118,979
 $72,489
 $79,316
          
Segment pre-tax operating margin6.7 % 12.9% 15.7%14.3% 9.8% 9.6%
     
Continued on next page
(1)Operating expenses include intangible asset amortization of $4.3 million, $4.9 million and $10.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Asset Management     
Management and performance fees     
Management fees$53,725
 $70,167
 $78,772
Performance fees584
 208
 892
Total management and performance fees54,309
 70,375
 79,664
      
Investment income/(loss)736
 (6,788) 683
      
Net revenues55,045
 63,587
 80,347
      
Operating expenses (1)132,360
 55,558
 59,166
      
Segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)$(77,315) $8,029
 $21,181
      
Segment pre-tax operating margin(140.5)% 12.6% 26.4%
      
      
Total     
Net revenues$747,349
 $672,918
 $648,138
      
Operating expenses (1)778,223
 586,495
 537,827
      
Pre-tax operating income/(loss)$(30,874) $86,423
 $110,311
      
Pre-tax operating margin(4.1)% 12.8% 17.0%
(1)Operating expenses include a $82.9 million goodwill impairment charge for the Asset Management segment, as well as intangible asset amortization expense as set forth in the table below:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Capital Markets$15,587
 $1,622
 $2,972
Asset Management5,627
 6,040
 6,300
Total intangible asset amortization expense$21,214
 $7,662
 $9,272

Reportable segment assets are as follows:
 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Capital Markets$1,934,528
 $1,870,272
Asset Management190,975
 268,246
 $2,125,503
 $2,138,518

Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Note 2423Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters


Piper JaffraySandler is registered as a securities broker dealer with the SEC and is a member of various SROs and securities exchanges. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"), serves as Piper Jaffray’sSandler's primary SRO. Piper JaffraySandler is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. Piper JaffraySandler has elected to use the alternative method permitted by the SEC rule which requires that it maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from customer transactions, as such term is defined in the SEC rule. Under its rules, FINRA may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances.$1.0 million. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated debt, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper JaffraySandler are subject to certain notificationapprovals, notifications and other provisions of SEC and FINRA rules.


At December 31, 2016,2019, net capital calculated under the SEC rule was $191.1$236.9 million,, and exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $190.1 million.$235.9 million.


The Company’sCompany's committed short-term credit facility, revolving credit facility and its senior notes with PIMCO include covenants requiring Piper JaffraySandler to maintain minimum net capital of $120 million.$120 million. CP Notes issued under CP Series IIIII A include a covenant that requires Piper JaffraySandler to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. The Company's fully disclosed clearing agreement with Pershing also includes a covenant requiring Piper Sandler to maintain excess net capital of $120 million.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued


Piper Sandler Ltd. and SCIL,, a broker dealer subsidiariessubsidiary registered in the United Kingdom, areis subject to the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Piper JaffraySandler Ltd. and SCIL werewas in compliance with the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority.


Piper JaffraySandler Hong Kong Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, which is subject to the liquid capital requirements of the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rule promulgated under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. At December 31, 2016,2019, Piper JaffraySandler Hong Kong Limited was in compliance with the liquid capital requirements of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.


Note 2524Income Taxes


Income tax expense/(benefit) is provided using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial statement purposes, using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.


As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" ("SAB 118"), the Company made a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and recorded a discrete item in its 2017 provisional income tax expense from continuing operations of $36.4 million. This amount reflected an estimated reduction of deferred tax assets as a result of the statutory federal rate decrease from 35 percent to 21 percent. Pursuant to the defined measurement period in SAB 118, the Company recorded an additional $1.0 million of income tax expense from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2018. The accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was complete as of December 31, 2018.

The components of income tax expense/(benefit)expense from continuing operations are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Current:     
Federal$(404) $16,351
 $30,230
State123
 4,784
 5,896
Foreign96
 276
 93
 (185) 21,411
 36,219
Deferred:     
Federal19,071
 (7,326) 20,692
State5,517
 (524) (1,849)
Foreign174
 4,485
 (1,254)
 24,762
 (3,365) 17,589
      
Total income tax expense from continuing operations$24,577
 $18,046
 $53,808
      
Total income tax expense/(benefit) from discontinued operations$8,370
 $1,001
 $(23,580)

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Current:     
Federal$11,704
 $33,818
 $37,331
State2,454
 7,030
 8,117
Foreign(703) 58
 161
 13,455
 40,906
 45,609
Deferred:     
Federal(27,764) (11,620) (8,641)
State(3,758) (1,901) (1,317)
Foreign939
 556
 335
 (30,583) (12,965) (9,623)
      
Total income tax expense/(benefit)$(17,128) $27,941
 $35,986


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




A reconciliation of federal income taxes from continuing operations at statutory rates to the Company’sCompany's effective tax rates is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Federal income tax expense at statutory rates$24,986
 $15,223
 $27,760
Increase/(reduction) in taxes resulting from:     
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
 952
 36,357
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit4,906
 3,390
 2,561
Net tax-exempt interest income(1,643) (3,034) (5,040)
Foreign jurisdictions tax rate differential(438) 1,067
 865
Non-deductible compensation3,293
 1,999
 
Change in valuation allowance(209) 5,299
 (752)
Vestings of stock awards(5,171) (7,052) (9,115)
Loss/(income) attributable to noncontrolling interests(1,357) 253
 (835)
Other, net210
 (51) 2,007
Total income tax expense from continuing operations$24,577
 $18,046
 $53,808

 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Federal income tax expense/(benefit) at statutory rates$(10,806) $30,248
 $38,609
Increase/(reduction) in taxes resulting from:     
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit(1,110) 3,155
 3,857
Net tax-exempt interest income(4,600) (4,299) (3,693)
Foreign jurisdictions tax rate differential1,860
 191
 (63)
Change in valuation allowance362
 
 
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests(2,872) (2,243) (3,903)
Other, net38
 889
 1,179
Total income tax expense/(benefit)$(17,128) $27,941
 $35,986


In accordance with ASC 740, U.S. income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries that are permanently reinvested. As of December 31, 2016, undistributed2019, 0 deferred taxes have been provided for withholding taxes or other taxes that would result upon repatriation of the Company's foreign earnings permanently reinvested into the Company’s foreign subsidiaries were not material.U.S.


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for the same items for income tax reporting purposes. The net deferred income tax assets included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition consisted of the following items:
 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Deferred compensation$54,969
 $63,147
Accrued lease liability13,531
 
Goodwill tax basis in excess of book basis11,059
 11,005
Net operating loss carryforwards4,965
 5,556
Liabilities/accruals not currently deductible1,530
 1,117
Other3,852
 4,733
Total deferred tax assets89,906
 85,558
Valuation allowance(4,599) (4,808)
    
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance85,307
 80,750
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Right-of-use lease asset9,289
 
Unrealized gains on firm investments3,988
 4,313
Fixed assets3,408
 2,886
Other587
 555
    
Total deferred tax liabilities17,272
 7,754
    
Net deferred tax assets$68,035
 $72,996

 December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Deferred compensation$79,230
 $74,127
Goodwill tax basis in excess of book basis18,357
 
Net operating loss carry forwards3,900
 3,947
Liabilities/accruals not currently deductible1,060
 5,454
Other5,474
 5,175
Total deferred tax assets108,021
 88,703
Valuation allowance(911) (159)
    
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance107,110
 88,544
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Goodwill book basis in excess of tax basis
 16,951
Unrealized gains on firm investments6,406
 2,917
Fixed assets2,075
 1,189
Other796
 677
    
Total deferred tax liabilities9,277
 21,734
    
Net deferred tax assets$97,833
 $66,810


The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded to the extent that it is more likely than not that any portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company believes that its future tax profits will be sufficient to recognize its deferred tax assets, with the exception of $0.9$4.6 million primarily related to SCIL'sin state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards.


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




The Company accounts for unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, which requires tax reserves to be recorded for uncertain tax positions on the consolidated statements of financial condition. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2016$123
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years166
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements(123)
Balance at December 31, 2017$166
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year608
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2018$774
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years4,128
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(358)
Settlements(285)
Balance at December 31, 2019$4,259

(Dollars in thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2013$2,200
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years123
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2014$2,323
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(2,000)
Settlements(200)
Balance at December 31, 2015$123
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2016$123


As of December 31, 20162019, approximately $0.1$0.2 million of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits would impact the annual effective rate, if recognized.


In 2019, the Company recorded a $4.1 million liability for uncertain state and local income tax positions related to its acquisition of Weeden & Co. This liability was recorded as a measurement period adjustment and includes a corresponding indemnification asset and deferred tax asset. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The Company had $1.2 million accrued related to the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2019. The Company had no accruals related to the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 20162018 and 2015, respectively. The Company had approximately $0.2 million for the payment of interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2014.2017. The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns with the various states and foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for years before 20142016 and is not subject to examination by state and local or non-U.S. tax authorities for taxable years before 2010.2015. The Company anticipates allthe majority of its uncertain income tax provisionspositions will be resolved within the next twelve months.


Note 2625Piper JaffraySandler Companies (Parent Company only)


Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
 December 31, December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$200
 $254
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries931,444
 676,516
Other assets16,878
 27,529
Total assets$948,522
 $704,299
    
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity   
Senior notes$175,000
 $
Accrued compensation30,336
 26,081
Other liabilities and accrued expenses11,903
 774
Total liabilities217,239
 26,855
    
Shareholders' equity731,283
 677,444
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$948,522
 $704,299

 December 31, December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$1,170
 $48
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries941,215
 982,426
Other assets22,031
 15,843
Total assets$964,416
 $998,317
    
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   
Senior notes$175,000
 $175,000
Accrued compensation27,756
 36,347
Other liabilities and accrued expenses2,410
 3,311
Total liabilities205,166
 214,658
    
Shareholders’ equity759,250
 783,659
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$964,416
 $998,317


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Condensed Statements of Operations
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Revenues:     
Dividends from subsidiaries$54,762
 $74,896
 $105,102
Interest815
 1,247
 1,125
Investment income/(loss)2,012
 (496) 4,060
Total revenues57,589
 75,647
 110,287
      
Interest expense1,910
 4,902
 7,170
      
Net revenues55,679
 70,745
 103,117
      
Non-interest expenses:     
Total non-interest expenses4,851
 5,844
 4,936
      
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries50,828
 64,901
 98,181
      
Income tax expense11,215
 10,833
 30,366
      
Income from continuing operations of parent company39,613
 54,068
 67,815
      
Equity in undistributed/(distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries99,005
 5,469
 (40,321)
      
Net income from continuing operations138,618
 59,537
 27,494
      
Discontinued operations:     
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(26,907) (2,501) (89,433)
      
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939)
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Revenues:     
Dividends from subsidiaries$104,016
 $37,649
 $50,333
Interest994
 650
 662
Investment income/(loss)1,835
 (2,033) 275
Total revenues106,845
 36,266
 51,270
      
Interest expense8,195
 6,406
 5,463
      
Net revenues98,650
 29,860
 45,807
      
Non-interest expenses:     
Total non-interest expenses4,505
 3,487
 5,318
      
Income before income tax expense and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries94,145
 26,373
 40,489
      
Income tax expense27,952
 9,191
 14,795
      
Income of parent company66,193
 17,182
 25,694
      
Equity in undistributed/(distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries(88,145) 34,893
 37,478
      
Net income/(loss)$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172


Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Continued




Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Operating Activities:     
Net income/(loss)$111,711
 $57,036
 $(61,939)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:     
Stock-based compensation643
 404
 208
Equity in undistributed/(distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries(99,005) (5,469) 40,321
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities13,349
 51,971
 (21,410)
      
Financing Activities:     
Issuance of senior notes175,000
 
 
Repayment of senior notes
 (125,000) (50,000)
Advances from/(to) subsidiaries(102,225) 188,995
 117,016
Repurchase of common stock(50,584) (70,903) (25,481)
Payment of cash dividend(35,594) (47,157) (18,947)
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities(13,403) (54,065) 22,588
      
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(54) (2,094) 1,178
      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year254
 2,348
 1,170
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$200
 $254
 $2,348

 Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Operating Activities:     
Net income/(loss)$(21,952) $52,075
 $63,172
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Stock-based and deferred compensation944
 70
 180
Equity in undistributed/(distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries88,145
 (34,893) (37,478)
      
Net cash provided by operating activities67,137
 17,252
 25,874
      
Investing Activities:     
Repayment of note receivable
 1,500
 2,000
      
Net cash provided by investing activities
 1,500
 2,000
      
Financing Activities:     
Issuance of senior notes
 125,000
 50,000
Repayment of senior notes
 (75,000) (50,000)
Advances from/(to) subsidiaries(6,276) 49,560
 (28,010)
Repurchase of common stock(59,739) (118,464) 
      
Net cash used in financing activities(66,015) (18,904) (28,010)
      
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,122
 (152) (136)
      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year48
 200
 336
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$1,170
 $48
 $200
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest$(7,201) $(5,756) $(4,801)
Income taxes$(27,952) $(9,191) $(14,795)


Note 26Subsequent Events

On January 3, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of Sandler O'Neill, a full-service investment banking firm and broker dealer focused on the financial services industry. The transaction was completed pursuant to the Agreement and Plans of Merger dated July 9, 2019. The total consideration of $485.0 million, for which the Company received $100.0 million of tangible book value, consisted of $350.0 million in cash and $135.0 million in restricted consideration, primarily in restricted stock. The Company also entered into acquisition-related compensation agreements with certain employees of $115.0 million, primarily in restricted stock, for retention purposes. Sandler O'Neill's results of operations will be included in the Company's consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition.

On February 21, 2020, the Company announced a definitive agreement to acquire The Valence Group, an investment bank offering mergers and acquisitions advisory services to companies and financial sponsors with a focus on the chemicals, materials and related sectors. The total consideration consists of cash and restricted stock. A portion of the restricted stock consideration will be used for retentive purposes. Additional consideration may be earned if certain revenue targets are achieved. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2020, subject to obtaining required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. 

Piper JaffraySandler Companies
Supplementary Data


Quarterly Information (unaudited)
 2016 Fiscal Quarter2019 Fiscal Quarter
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)  First  Second  Third  Fourth  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
Total revenues $159,601
 $176,392
 $206,276
 $227,605
 $185,185
 $175,411
 $202,912
 $282,791
 
Interest expense 6,045
 5,909
 5,429
 5,142
 2,643
 2,993
 2,177
 3,920
 
Net revenues 153,556
 170,483
 200,847
 222,463
 182,542
 172,418
 200,735
 278,871
 
Non-interest expenses 150,114
 163,974
 182,396
 281,739
(1) 
159,405
 151,493
 179,700
 224,989
 
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) 3,442
 6,509
 18,451
 (59,276) 
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense/(benefit)23,137
 20,925
 21,035
 53,882
 
Income tax expense/(benefit) 256
 1,996
 6,515
 (25,895) 4,192
 (180) 6,717
 13,848
 
Net income/(loss) 3,186
 4,513
 11,936
 (33,381) 
Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests 749
 2,575
 1,278
 3,604
 
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies $2,437
 $1,938
 $10,658
 (36,985) 
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies' common shareholders $2,124
 $1,577
 $8,582
 $(36,985)
(2) 
Income from continuing operations18,945
 21,105
 14,318
 40,034
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(139) (2,166) 26,077
 
 
Net income18,806
 18,939
 40,395
 40,034
 
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests(616) 8,550
 (2,847) 1,376
 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$19,422
 $10,389
 $43,242
 38,658
 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies' common shareholders$17,835
 $10,151
 $42,442
 $38,006
 
                 
Earnings/(loss) per common share         
Amounts applicable to Piper Sandler Companies        
Net income from continuing operations$19,561
 $12,555
 $17,165
 $38,658
 
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations(139) (2,166) 26,077
 
 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$19,422
 $10,389
 $43,242
 $38,658
 
        
Earnings per basic common share        
Income from continuing operations$1.36
 $0.90
 $1.23
 $2.77
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations(0.01) (0.15) 1.87
 
 
Earnings per basic common share$1.35
 $0.75
 $3.09
 $2.77
 
        
Earnings per diluted common share        
Income from continuing operations$1.33
 $0.87
 $1.20
 $2.70
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations(0.01) (0.15) 1.82
 
 
Earnings per diluted common share$1.32
 $0.72
 $3.01
 $2.70
 
        
Dividends declared per common share$1.385
 $0.375
 $0.375
 $0.375
 
        
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding        
Basic $0.16
 $0.12
 $0.70
 $(3.00) 13,204
 13,588
 13,708
 13,714
 
Diluted $0.16
 $0.12
 $0.70
 $(3.00)
(3) 
13,530
 14,024
 14,085
 14,100
 
         
Weighted average number of common shares         
Basic 13,160
 12,927
 12,282
 12,337
 
Diluted 13,172
 12,942
 12,298
 12,353
(3) 

(1)Includes a $82.9 million goodwill impairment charge.
(2)No allocation of income was made due to loss position.
(3)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred.

Piper Sandler Companies
Supplementary Data – Continued

 2018 Fiscal Quarter
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) First  Second  Third  Fourth 
Total revenues$163,200
 $167,460
 $209,656
 $217,188
 
Interest expense5,338
 5,099
 3,705
 2,409
 
Net revenues157,862
 162,361
 205,951
 214,779
 
Non-interest expenses149,740
 157,474
 178,165
 183,085
 
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense/(benefit)8,122
 4,887
 27,786
 31,694
 
Income tax expense/(benefit)(2,512) 559
 6,902
 13,097
 
Income from continuing operations10,634
 4,328
 20,884
 18,597
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(15) 364
 1,386
 (348) 
Net income10,619
 4,692
 22,270
 18,249
 
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests16
 (1,534) 247
 65
 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$10,603
 $6,226
 $22,023
 $18,184
 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies' common shareholders$6,435
 $5,522
 $19,377
 $16,164
 
         
Amounts applicable to Piper Sandler Companies        
Net income from continuing operations$10,618
 $5,862
 $20,637
 $18,532
 
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations(15) 364
 1,386
 (348) 
Net income applicable to Piper Sandler Companies$10,603
 $6,226
 $22,023
 $18,184
 
         
Earnings per basic common share        
Income from continuing operations$0.47
 $0.40
 $1.36
 $1.25
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
 0.03
 0.09
 (0.02) 
Earnings per basic common share$0.47
 $0.43
 $1.45
 $1.22
 
         
Earnings per diluted common share        
Income from continuing operations$0.50
 $0.40
 $1.34
 $1.23
 
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
 0.03
 0.09
 (0.02) 
Earnings per diluted common share$0.50
 $0.43
 $1.43
 $1.21
 
         
Dividends declared per common share$1.995
 $0.375
 $0.375
 $0.375
 
         
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding        
Basic13,096
 13,303
 13,343
 13,191
 
Diluted13,382
 13,438
 13,508
 13,367
 

  2015 Fiscal Quarter
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
Total revenues $168,431
 $170,110
 $154,732
 $203,044
 
Interest expense 6,560
 6,044
 5,115
 5,680
 
Net revenues 161,871
 164,066
 149,617
 197,364
 
Non-interest expenses 130,579
 138,207
 142,829
 174,880
 
Income before income tax expense 31,292
 25,859
 6,788
 22,484
 
Income tax expense 9,490
 9,542
 1,573
 7,336
 
Net income 21,802
 16,317
 5,215
 15,148
 
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests 4,830
 (682) 384
 1,875
 
Net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies $16,972
 $16,999
 $4,831
 $13,273
 
Net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies' common shareholders $15,810
 $15,699
 $4,448
 $12,147
 
          
Earnings per common share         
Basic $1.03
 $1.08
 $0.32
 $0.88
 
Diluted $1.03
 $1.08
 $0.32
 $0.88
 
          
Weighted average number of common shares         
Basic 15,294
 14,487
 13,938
 13,775
 
Diluted 15,332
 14,513
 13,952
 13,782
 






ITEM 9.       CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.


None.


ITEM 9A.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.


As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.


During the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, there was no change in our system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm on management’smanagement's assessment of internal control over financial reporting are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K entitled "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" and are incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 9B.     OTHER INFORMATION.


Not applicable.None.


PART III


ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.


The information regarding our executive officers included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K under the caption "Executive"Information About our Executive Officers" is incorporated herein by reference. The information in the definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017,15, 2020, under the captions "Item I"Proposal One — Election of Directors," "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Committees of the Board — Audit Committee," "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Codes of Ethics and Business Conduct" and "Section"Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance"Reports" is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.


The information in the definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017,15, 2020, under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors" and "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Non-Employee Director Compensation for 2016"2019" is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 12.     SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDERSTOCKHOLDER MATTERS.


The information in the definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017,15, 2020, under the captions "Security Ownership — Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers," "Security Ownership — Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common Stock" and "Executive Compensation — Outstanding Equity Awards"Awards at Fiscal Year-End" are incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 13.     CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.


The information in the definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017,15, 2020, under the captions "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Director Independence," "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Transactions with Related Persons" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons" is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 14.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.


The information in the definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 2017,15, 2020, under the captions "Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Our Independent Auditor — Auditor Fees" and "Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Our Independent Auditor — Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy" is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV


ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.


(a)(1)    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.


The Consolidated Financial Statements are incorporated herein by reference and included in Part II, Item 8 to this Form 10-K.


(a)(2)    FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.


All financial statement schedules for the Company have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the related footnotes, or are either inapplicable or not required.


(a)(3)    EXHIBITS.


Exhibit Index
Exhibit  
Number Description
   
2.1 
2.2

2.3 
2.4

Exhibit Index
Exhibit
NumberDescription
2.5
3.1 
3.2 
3.3
4.1 
4.2 

Exhibit
Number    Description
4.3 
4.4
4.44.5 
4.6
4.7
10.1 
10.2 
10.3 U.S. Bancorp
10.4U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century Growth Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective September 30, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 8, 2004). †
10.5Piper JaffraySandler Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended May 31, 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 14, 2015). †
10.610.4 
10.710.5 
10.8Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employee Grants in 2014 (related to 2013 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed February 28, 2014). †
10.9Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employee Grants in 2015 (related to 2014 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.10Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2015 (related to 2014 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.11Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2004 and 2005 (related to 2003 and 2004 performance, respectively) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed August 4, 2004). †
10.12Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2006 (related to 2005 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 1, 2006). †
10.13Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2007 and 2008 (related to 2006 and 2007 performance, respectively) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed March 1, 2007). †
10.14Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Director2016 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper JaffraySandler Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed August 4, 2004). †
10.15Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2012 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed August 2, 2012). †

Exhibit
Number    Description
10.16Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2013 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, filed July 31, 2013). †
10.17Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2014 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, filed July 30, 2014). †
10.18Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2015 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed August 5, 2015). †
10.19Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2016 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016). †
10.2010.6 
10.7
10.8

Exhibit Index
Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.9
10.2110.10 
10.2210.11 
10.2310.12 
10.2410.13 
10.14
10.15
10.2510.16 
10.2610.17 
10.2710.18 
10.2810.19 
10.29Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated June 2, 2014 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper Jaffray & Co. and the Purchasers party theretoAssociation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K,10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, filed June 5, 2014)May 9, 2017).
10.3010.20 Second
10.3110.21 Compensation Arrangement with M. Brad Winges
10.32Restricted Limited Partnership Interest Agreement dated February 23, 2015, by and between Piper Jaffray Investment Management LLC and M. Brad Winges (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2018, filed February 26, 2015)2019).
10.3310.22 Advisory Research, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
10.3410.23 
10.35Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2012 and 2013 (related to performance in 2011 and 2012, respectively)2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed February 27, 2012). †

Exhibit
Number    Description
10.36Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2014 (related to performance in 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2910.34 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2016, filed February 28, 2014)24, 2017). †
10.3710.24 Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2015 (related to performance in 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.38Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2015 (related to performance in 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.39
10.4010.25 
10.4110.26 

10.42
Exhibit Index
Exhibit 
NumberDescription
10.27
10.4310.28 
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.4410.37 
10.4510.38 Consulting
10.4610.39 
10.40
10.41
10.42

Exhibit Index
Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.43
21.1 
23.1 
24.1 
31.1 
31.2 
32.1 
101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 Registration S-T:The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in iXBRL (inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, for(iv) the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (iv)Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows forand (vi) the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and (v) the notesNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
104The cover page from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in iXBRL.
_______________________
#The Company hereby agrees to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request any omitted exhibit or schedule.
This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or agreement.
*Filed herewith
**This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




ITEM 16.     FORM 10-K SUMMARY.


None.




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 28, 2020.


PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES
By/s/ Chad R. Abraham
NameChad R. Abraham
ItsChief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 24, 201728, 2020.


PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
By/s/ Andrew S. Duff
ItsChairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 24, 2017.
 SIGNATURE  TITLE
     
 /s/ Andrew S. DuffChad R. Abraham  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Andrew S. DuffChad R. Abraham  (Principal Executive Officer)
     
 /s/ DebbraTimothy L. SchonemanCarter  Chief Financial Officer
 DebbraTimothy L. SchonemanCarter  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Jonathan J. DoyleDirector
Jonathan J. Doyle
     
 /s/ William R. Fitzgerald  Director
 William R. Fitzgerald   
     
 /s/ Michael E. FrazierVictoria M. Holt  Director
 
Michael E. Frazier

/s/ B. Kristine JohnsonDirector
B. Kristine JohnsonVictoria M. Holt   
     
 /s/ Addison L. Piper  Director
 Addison L. Piper
/s/ Debbra L. SchonemanDirector
Debbra L. Schoneman
/s/ Thomas S. Schreier Jr.Director
Thomas S. Schreier Jr.   
     
 /s/ Sherry M. Smith  Director
 Sherry M. Smith   
     
 /s/ Philip E. Soran  Director
 Philip E. Soran   
     
 /s/ Scott C. Taylor  Director
 Scott C. Taylor   
     
/s/ Michele VolpiDirector
Michele Volpi


Exhibit Index
118
Exhibit
NumberDescription
2.1Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of December 23, 2003, between U.S. Bancorp and Piper Jaffray Companies (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 8, 2004). #
2.2Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 16, 2015 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper Jaffray & Co., Simmons & Company International, SCI JV LP, SCI GP, LLC, and Simmons & Company International Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2015). #
2.3First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 25, 2016 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper Jaffray & Co., Simmons & Company International, SCI JV LP, SCI GP, LLC, and Simmons & Company International Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016). #
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, filed August 3, 2007).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws (as of August 5, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2016).
4.1Form of Specimen Certificate for Piper Jaffray Companies Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed February 25, 2016).
4.2Second Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of June 11, 2012 (Secured Commercial Paper Notes), between Piper Jaffray & Co. and the Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed August 2, 2012).
4.3Indenture dated as of April 2, 2012 (Secured Commercial Paper Notes -- Series II), between Piper Jaffray & Co. and the Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 5, 2012).
4.4Second Amended and Restated Indenture dated April 21, 2014 (Secured Commercial Paper Notes -- Series III), between Piper Jaffray & Co. and the Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 21, 2014).
10.1Form of director indemnification agreement between Piper Jaffray Companies and its directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 17, 2014). †
10.2Office Lease Agreement, dated May 30, 2012, by and among Piper Jaffray & Co. and Wells REIT – 800 Nicollett Avenue Owner, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2012).
10.3U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 8, 2004). †
10.4U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century Growth Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective September 30, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 8, 2004). †
10.5Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended May 31, 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 14, 2015). †
10.6Piper Jaffray Companies Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, filed July 31, 2013). †
10.7Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employee Grants in 2011, 2012, and 2013 (related to 2010, 2011, and 2012 performance, respectively) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed February 28, 2011). †
10.8Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employee Grants in 2014 (related to 2013 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed February 28, 2014). †
10.9Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employee Grants in 2015 (related to 2014 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †

Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.10Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2015 (related to 2014 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.11Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2004 and 2005 (related to 2003 and 2004 performance, respectively) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed August 4, 2004). †
10.12Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2006 (related to 2005 performance) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 1, 2006). †
10.13Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employee Grants in 2007 and 2008 (related to 2006 and 2007 performance, respectively) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed March 1, 2007). †
10.14Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Director Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed August 4, 2004). †
10.15Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2012 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed August 2, 2012). †
10.16Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2013 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, filed July 31, 2013). †
10.17Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2014 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, filed July 30, 2014). †
10.18Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2015 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed August 5, 2015). †
10.19Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2016 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016). †
10.20Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement for 2017 Leadership Team Grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan. †*
10.21Piper Jaffray Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated effective May 4, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, filed August 5, 2016). †
10.22Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program. †*
10.23Form of Notice Period Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed March 1, 2007). †
10.24Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated December 28, 2012, between Piper Jaffray & Co. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed February 27, 2013).
10.25First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated December 28, 2013, between Piper Jaffray & Co. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed February 28, 2014).
10.26Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated December 19, 2014, between Piper Jaffray & Co. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015).

Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.27Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated December 18, 2015, between Piper Jaffray & Co. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed February 25, 2016).
10.28Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated December 17, 2016, between Piper Jaffray & Co. and U.S. Bank National Association. *
10.29Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated June 2, 2014 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper Jaffray & Co. and the Purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 5, 2014).
10.30Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated October 8, 2015 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper Jaffray & Co., and the Purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 13, 2015).
10.31Compensation Arrangement with M. Brad Winges (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed February 27, 2013). †
10.32Restricted Limited Partnership Interest Agreement dated February 23, 2015, by and between Piper Jaffray Investment Management LLC and M. Brad Winges (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.33Advisory Research, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed February 28, 2014). †
10.34Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan, effective as of December 13, 2016. † *
10.35Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2012 and 2013 (related to performance in 2011 and 2012, respectively) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed February 27, 2012). †
10.36Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2014 (related to performance in 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed February 28, 2014). †
10.37Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2015 (related to performance in 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.38Form of Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2015 (related to performance in 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 26, 2015). †
10.39Form of Restricted Stock and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2016 (related to performance in 2015) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed February 25, 2016). †
10.40Form of Restricted Stock and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2016 (related to performance in 2015) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed February 25, 2016). †
10.41Form of Restricted Stock and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for Employee Grants in 2017 (related to performance in 2016) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan.†*
10.42Form of Restricted Stock and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Agreement for California-based Employee Grants in 2017 (related to performance in 2016) under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan.†*
10.43Piper Jaffray Companies 2016 Employment Inducement Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed February 25, 2016). †
10.44Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for grants under the Piper Jaffray Companies 2016 Employment Inducement Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed February 25, 2016). †
10.45Consulting Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor dated November 16, 2015 by and between Piper Jaffray & Co. and Michael E. Frazier (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016). †

Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.46Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 16, 2015 by and between Piper Jaffray Companies and Michael E. Frazier (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, filed May 4, 2016). †
21.1Subsidiaries of Piper Jaffray Companies *
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP *
24.1Power of Attorney *
31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1Section 1350 Certifications.
101Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 Registration S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and (v) the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
_______________________
#The Company hereby agrees to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request any omitted exhibit or schedule.
This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or agreement.
*Filed herewith
**This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



128