|
|
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
FORM 10-K
|
| | | | | | |
| x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | | or | | o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122013 | | | | | For the transition period from to |
| | | | | | | |
Commission file number 001-32887
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 11-3547680 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
| 23 Main Street, Holmdel, New Jersey | | 07733 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 528-2600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share | | The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:
o Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer
o Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) o Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 20122013 was $344,612,156475,667,272 based on the closing price of $2.01$2.83 per share.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of January 31, 20132014 was 214,103,180211,519,604.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Selected portions of the Vonage Holdings Corp. definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 20122013, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED December 31, 20122013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | | Page |
| PART I |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. |
| |
| PART II |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| PART III |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| PART IV |
| Item 15. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
|
|
| FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements and other information which are deemed to be “forward-looking” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Litigation Reform Act”). These forward-looking statements and other information are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by us using information currently available.
The words "plan," “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, and are not a guarantee of future performance. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in such forward-looking statements or information. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relate to events and state our beliefs and the assumptions made by us only as to the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
In accordance with the provisions of the Litigation Reform Act, we are making investors aware that such forward-looking statements, because they relate to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, any exhibits to this Form 10-K and other public statements we make. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the competition we face; our ability to adapt to rapid changes
in the market for voice and messaging services; our ability to retain customers and attract new customers; our ability to establish and expand strategic alliances; governmental regulation and related actions and taxes in our international operations; increased market and competitive risks, including currency restrictions, in our international operations; risks related to the acquisition or integration of future businesses or joint ventures;ventures, including the risks related to the acquisition of Vocalocity, and the economic and performance risks associated with our joint venture in Brazil; the impact of fluctuations in economic conditions, particularly on our small and medium business customers, our ability to obtain or maintain relevant intellectual property licenses; intellectual property and other litigation that have been and may be brought against us; failure to protect our trademarks and internally developed software; security breaches and other compromises of information security; obligations and restrictions associated with data privacy; our dependence on third party facilities, equipment, systems and services; system disruptions or flaws in our technology and systems; uncertainties relating to regulation of VoIP services; liability under anti-corruption laws; results of regulatory inquiries into our business practices; fraudulent use of our name or services; our ability to maintain data security; our dependence upon key personnel; our dependence on our customers' existing broadband connections; differences between our service and traditional phone services, including our 911 service;services; restrictions in our debt agreements that may limit our operating flexibility; our ability to obtain additional financing if required; any reinstatement of holdbacks by our vendors; our history of net losses and ability to achieve consistent profitability in the future; and other factors that are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
|
|
| FINANCIAL INFORMATION PRESENTATION |
For the financial information discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than per share and per line amounts, dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except where noted. All trademarks are the property of their owners.
1 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of communications services connecting people through cloud-connected devices worldwide. We rely heavily on our network, which is a flexible, scalable Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) based Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, network. This platform enables a user via a single “identity,” either a number or user name, to access and utilize services and features regardless of how they are connected to the Internet, including over 3G, 4G, Cable, or DSL broadband networks. This technology enables us to offer our customers attractively priced voice and messaging services and other features around the world on a variety of devices.
Over the past five years, we have fundamentally transformed our company - strategically, operationally and financially. Strategically, we shifted our primary focus to serving rapidly growing but under-served ethnic segments in the United States with international calling needs. We improved our value proposition by being the first to deliver flat-rate, unlimited calling primarily from the United States to over 60 countries with the launch of our Vonage World service, and we were the first to provide easy-to-use, enhanced features, like voice-to-text translation and mobile Extension services, at no extra cost. These strategic shifts have resulted in new customers with a higher average lifetime value and a better churn profile than those in the past. Reflecting the higher value proposition, we have increased our average revenue per user over this time period.
Our focus on operations during this period has resulted in a significantly improved cost structure. We have implemented operational efficiencies throughout our business and have reduced domestic and international termination costs per minute, and customer care costs. Importantly, we have enabled structural cost reductions while significantly improving network call quality and customer service performance. Improvements in the overall customer experience have contributed to lower churn, which declined from highs of 3.6%has remained in July 2009 to 2.5% at the end of the 2012.mid 2% range for six consecutive quarters.
Through debt refinancings in December 2010, and July 2011, and February 2013, we have fundamentally improved our balance sheet, reducing annual interest expense from $49 million in 2010 to $6 million in 2012 and reducing interest rates from as high as 20% in 2009 to less than 4% today..
In part as a result of our operational and financial stability, on February 7, 2013, Vonage's Board of Directors discontinued the remainder ofand our existingdisciplined approach to cash management, we established our share repurchase program effective at the closewhich was first instituted in August of business on February 12, 2013 with $16,682 remaining, and authorized2012. The Company currently has a new program$100 million repurchase authorization in place to repurchase up to $100,000 of the Company's outstanding sharesbe completed by December 31, 2014. We believe our repurchase program reflects our balanced approach to capital allocation as we invest for growth through our growth initiativespriorities and deliver value to shareholders without compromising our ongoing operational needs.
Having achieved operational and financial stability, we are focused on driving revenue through three major growth initiatives.priorities. The first growth initiativeof these is incontinued penetration of our core North American markets, where we will continue to provide value in international long distance and target under-served ethnic segments, andwhere we expect to enterhave entered the low-end domestic market with our flanker brand, BasicTalk, a secondary brand.low-priced home phone service offering unlimited calling throughout the United States, and where we have expanded our offering to small and medium business (SMB) and small office, home office (SOHO) customers through the acquisition of Vocalocity, Inc. Our second growth initiativepriority is international expansion outside of North America through strategic partnerships. OurFinally, our third growth initiativepriority is mobile services, which we view as a strategic enabler of the Company's entire product offering.
| |
> | Core North American Markets |
International long distance. We are solidifyingAs a part of our core business through continued penetration ofstrategic plan, we shifted our primary focus in our domestic markets to serving the rapidly growing but under-served ethnic segments in the United States with international calling segments.needs. The markets for international long distance are large and growing, and they allow us to leverage our VoIP network by providing customers a low-cost and convenient alternative to services offered by telecom and cable providers and international calling cards. According to industry data, the total outbound international long distance calling market is estimated to be $80 billion, and approximately 10 to 15 percent of all US households make international long distance calls, using a mix of home and mobile phones.
An increasing proportion of With our Vonage World product, we have successfully grown our international calling customer base are international callers. Approximately 50 percent of our customers are now on Vonage World, and approximately 40 percent are international long distance callers and we continue to focus on strengthening this component of our customer base. Targeting the substantial market opportunities for customers calling Mexico and Southeast Asia, we launched several new calling plans in 2012, and were the first to provide unlimited calling to mobile phones in both Mexico and South Korea.multiple ethnic markets.
To increase the visibility of our international long distance plans, we have shifted an increasing portion of our marketing budget from broad national advertising as we target attractive segments of the international long distance market. We have direct sales channels where customers can subscribe to our services on-line or through our toll-free number, as well as a retail distribution channel through regional and national retailers and localized street teams. Our retail distribution outlets include Walmart, Best Buy, Kmart, Sears, RadioShack,Brandsmart, Fry's, and Microcenter.
Sales from our assisted selling initiative, where we place Vonage sales representatives in mass merchant stores to proactively engage customers, have increased as a portion of total sales. We have increased the number of stores with assisted selling to more than 300500 at the end of 20122013 and we expect to expand that number in 2013.2014. In addition, we have nearly 375increased the number of part-time sales agents, organized in community teams, selling Vonage services directly to consumers in targeted ethnic segments. We have a presence in nearly every major ethnic market in the United States and we are expanding in Canada.
Low-end domestic. While our primary emphasis remains the international long distance calling market in the United States, the domestic-only calling segment, with over 40 million broadband households, remains a sizeable opportunity which we expect to target with our low-priced domestic calling only BasicTalk product. We believe this segmentthe low-end domestic market represents a large incremental market opportunity for light users and security-conscious households, often with poor in-home wireless coverage. To address this market, in the second quarter of 2013 we launched nationwide BasicTalk, our low-end domestic calling product. BasicTalk is sold in all Walmart stores nationwide and through our direct telesales and online channels. We believe the low-end domestic segment remains a sizeable opportunity, with over 40 million broadband households, and we expect to continue to gain share as we expand distribution and improve our direct channel performance.
Small and Medium Business. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated October 9, 2013, by and among Vocalocity Inc. ("Vocalocity"), Vista Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage (“Merger Sub”), Vonage and Shareholder Representative Services, LLC (acting solely in its capacity as the Representative, the “Representative”), on November 15, 2013, Merger Sub merged with and into Vocalocity, and Vocalocity became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage (the “ Merger ”).
Vocalocity was acquired for $130,000 adjusted for $2,869 of excess cash as of the closing date and the increase in value of the 7,983 shares of Vonage common stock from the signing date to the closing date of $1,298, resulting in a total acquisition cost was $134,167. We financed the transaction through $32,981 of cash and $75,000 from our credit facility. The acquisition of Vocalocity immediately positions
2 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Vonage as a leader in the SMB hosted VoIP market. SMB and SOHO services will be offered under the Vonage Business Solutions brand.
Expansion opportunities outside of the United States. We currently have operations in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada and believe that our low-cost Internet based communications platform enables us to cost effectively deliver voice and messaging services to other locations throughout the world.
The global consumer communications market is estimated to be $200 billion and growing at approximately 7% per year. We are expanding our geographic footprint through partnerships and are pursuing a range of business concepts which include jointly providing low rates and expanded footprints with international partners to placing kiosks in foreign locations, to providing a full suite of communications services sold and marketed jointly with or by other companies.
In 2012, we signed our first partnership with Globe in the Philippines, offering a Philippines calling plan for the more than three million Filipinos living in the United States. In February 2013, we signed
2 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
our second international partnership, a joint venture with Datora Telecomunicacoes Ltda., to deliver communications services in Brazil. We are in discussions with other prospective international partners in countries we have targeted for expansion. These partnerships underscore our strategy to expand our services beyond North America and the United Kingdom.
Mobile and other connected device services. Mobility has become central to our development priorities, including enhancements to our core services through our patented Extensions product and our digital calling card, international expansion opportunities, and as a standalone products. Over the past 18 months, we have built a mobile platform that has the ability to deliver high-quality voice, messaging, and in the future, video communication, across wired and wireless data networks. In addition, we recently conducted a technical trial of our new mobile roaming feature in Western Europe.
In early 2012, we introducedproduct through Vonage Mobile, our all-in-one mobile application that provides free, high quality voice and video calling and messaging between users who have the application, as well as low-cost international calling to more than 200 countries to any other phone. In 2013 we continued to improve Vonage Mobile with quality and feature enhancements including video calling and video voicemail. In addition, we recently conducted a technical trial of our new ReachMe roaming feature in Western Europe.
Customer interest in our patented Extensions product, which allows consumers to extend their Vonage home phone service to another phone, including mobiles, continues to grow, and we now have 28% of our customer base signed up to use Vonage on their mobile phone through this service. 24%25% of all international calls on our network now originate from a mobile phone. Our recently launched Digital Calling Card for mobile phones makes use of the same platform, directly competing with traditional calling card services.
We had approximately 2.42.5 million subscriber lines for broadband telephone replacement services as of December 31, 20122013. We bill customers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Customers in the United States represented 93%94% of our subscriber lines at December 31, 20122013.
Our home telephone replacement services are offered to residential small office and home office customers through several service plans with different pricing structures. The service plans include an array of basic features such as voicemail, call waiting call forwarding as well as unique features Simulring, visual voicemail and enhanced features, and customers have the opportunity to purchase premium features for an additional fee.Extensions. We also charge for local and international calling outside of plan limits. Information on our revenues, operating income, and identifiable assets appears in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 hereof.
As of December 31, 20122013, approximately 95%89% of our United States subscriber lines were for residential service. Our primary residential offering is Vonage World with approximately 1.11.0 million subscriber lines as of December 31, 20122013. For a flat monthly fee, this plan includes unlimited localdomestic calling (U.S., Canada, and Puerto
Rico) and unlimited calling to landline phones in all cities and locations in more than 60 countries, including India, Mexico, and China, and unlimited calling to mobile phones in certain of those countries. In addition, the Vonage World offer includes unlimited Vonage Visual Voicemail, which is “readable voicemail” delivered via email or SMS text message, Vonage Extensions, which extends the plan to additional phone numbers and devices including smartphones and feature phones, and directory assistance. We also market other residential plans that include enhanced featureslimited domestic or limitedinternational minutes, in addition to offeringsuch as our legacy Residential Premium Unlimited800 plan to existing customers.
We view the small and home office market as a potential growth market. In the United States we offer two small and home office calling plans, one of which offers unlimited local and long distance calling anywhere in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, and five European countries and another that includes a specified number of800 minutes into the United States,U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico. Both plans offer a free dedicated fax line.
We offer similar plans in Canada and the United Kingdom. Please see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for financial information about our geographic areas.
Each of our residential small office and home office calling plans provides a number of basic features including call waiting, caller ID with name, call forwarding, and voicemail. We also offer, in some cases for additional fees, a number of enhanced servicesfeatures that we believe help differentiate our service from our competitors, such as:
| |
| > | Area Code Selection. Customers can select from approximately 281287 United States area codes for their telephone number for use with our service, regardless of physical location. |
| |
| > | Virtual Phone Number. A customer can have additional inbound telephone numbers that ring on a primary subscriber line, each for an additional fee. Each of these inbound telephone numbers can have a different area code. In addition to United States virtual phone numbers, we offer virtual phone numbers for 19 other countries. For example, a customer living in New York City with a New York City phone number can purchase a Toronto virtual phone number that rings on the customer’s primary subscriber line. In this instance, a caller from Toronto could call the customer’s virtual phone number and be billed as if the customer were in Toronto. Virtual phone numbers are not included in our subscriber line count. |
| |
| > | Personalized Web-Enabled Voicemail. Our service allows customers to receive e-mail notification of a voicemail with the voice message attached to the e-mail message as an audio file. Our customers can also check and retrieve voicemails online or from any phone.
|
Through our recent acquisition of Vocalocity, Vonage Business Solutions offers SMB and SOHO customers several service plans with different pricing structures. The service plans include an array of features applicable to the needs of SMB and SOHO customers. Customers also have the opportunity to purchase premium features for additional fees.
Our mobile services include enhancements to our residential small office and home office calling plans as well as mobile applications that can be initially downloaded for iPhone®, iPad®, iPod touch®, and Android® OS devices for free. In August 2011, we launched Extensions, an enhancement to our flat rate, unlimited international calling plan that extends the plan to additional phone numbers and devices including smartphones and feature phones. A customer may sign-up for up to two extensions with the first extension provided free of charge and the second extension incurring an additional fee. In early 2012, we introduced Vonage Mobile, our all-in-one mobile application that provides free calling and messaging between users who have the application, as well as low-cost international calling to more than 200 countries to any other phone. In addition, calls by users of the mobile application to Vonage home or business lines are also free. This mobile application works over WiFi, 3G and 4G and in more than 90 countries worldwide.
Devices
In order to access our residential small office, and home officeSOHO services, a customer need only connect a standard telephone to a broadband Internet connection through a small Vonage-enabled device. In order
3 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
to access our SMB services, a customer need only connect through a VoIP-enabled telephone. After connecting the device, our customers can use their telephone to make and receive calls. Many of our adapters include a networking router and generally permit a subscriber to connect up to two Vonage lines through a high-speed Internet connection. Vonage-enabled devices allow customers to use the Internet connection for their computer and telephones at the same time while ensuring a high quality calling experience. We also offer a cordless multi-phone system solution. Our plug-and-play Vonage-enabled devices permit portability as customers can take their Vonage device to different locations where broadband service is available. Since May 2009, we generally have not charged new customers for the adapters permitting use of our service.
WORK OERATIONS
3 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
Our network operations are conducted by a wholly-owned subsidiary that holds our networking equipment and employs the personnel who develop and operate our technology.
The Vonage network uses our customer’s existing high-speed broadband Internet service to allow calls over the Internet either from a standard telephone through a Vonage-enabled device or through soft phone software or mobile client applications. Our service is not dependent on any specific type or provider of Internet service, and our customers are free to change their Internet service provider in response to a competitive alternative, or because they have moved to a different location. Our Vonage-enabled devices, soft phone software, and mobile client applications allow our customers to be authenticated and authorized to access our network in a secure manner.
Our network is scalable and geographically distributed for robustness, high availability, and reliability across multiple call processing sites, using regional data interconnection points, where calls to non-Vonage customers are interconnected with the public switched telephone network. We periodically assess the locations of our regional data connection points in connection with efforts to improve the quality of and efficiency in delivering our service. In 2011,2013, we consolidated certain interconnection points, increasing efficiencies and creating a platform for growth. Our interconnections with the public switched telephone network are made pursuant to agreements we have with several telecommunications providers. Under these agreements, we transfer calls originated by our customers to other carriers who connect the call to the called party.party or connect peer to peer. We payhave a per-minute chargevarying degree of settlement arrangements with our carrier partners for this.indirect third party or direct termination of our calls. The calls are routed from our network to other carriers’ interconnected circuits at co-location facilities in which we lease space. This method of connecting to the public switched telephone network allows us to expand capacity quickly, as necessary to meet call volume, and to provide redundancy within our network. In 2011,2013, we enhancedcontinued to enhance our call routing platform, increasing our control over call routing which lowered costs and improved call quality. Our business is not substantially dependent upon our agreements with any single carrier or our interconnection agreements because we can easily substitute other telecommunications providers in order to obtain the same or similar service.
Because Vonage’s system is not constrained to use any specific broadband service provider to connect to our customers, we can centrally manage and share resources across our customer base to minimize capital investment when entering new markets.
The following are also important in supporting our network operations:
| |
| > | Network Operations Center. We currently maintain a network operations center at our headquarters with monitoring redundancies at several points within our network. The network operations center monitors and manages the status and health of our network elements, allowing us to manage our network in real time, respond to alert notifications, and re-route network traffic as needed. We pursue a multi-faceted approach to managing our network to ensure high call quality and reliable communications services to our customers. |
| |
| > | Back Office Systems. In addition to our network management systems, we have developed a number of software systems that enable us to manage our network and service offerings more efficiently and effectively. Key aspects of these systems include: |
| |
| > | Network Quality Metrics. We have implemented a suite of advanced metrics gathering and analysis tools that allow us to monitor the performance of our calling and data network, customer premises equipment, and other associated calling elements in real-time. This suite is proprietary and was developed specifically to address the needs that Vonage has in monitoring, analyzing, understanding, troubleshooting, maintaining, and operating a world-class consumer VoIP platform. |
| |
| > | Web Portal. We provide a fully functional customer Web portal that allows our customers to configure and manage almost all aspects of their service on the Internet without requiring intervention of a customer-care representative. The portal permits customers to add and change features and phone numbers, update billing information, and access all of their call usage and billing details. |
| |
| > | Emergency Calling Service and Enhanced 911 Service. We have deployed E-911 service to approximately 99.99% of our U.S. residential and small and home office customer base that is comparable to the emergency calling services provided to customers of traditional wireline telephone companies in the same area. Our E-911 service does not support the calls of our soft phone software users. The emergency calls of our soft phone software users are supported by a national call center. Not all Vonage products require 911 service capabilities, such as our mobile client products. To enable us to effectively deploy and provide our E-911 service, we maintain an agreement with a provider that assists us in delivering emergency calls to an emergency service dispatcher at the public safety answering point, or PSAP, in the area of the customer’s registered location and terminating E-911 calls. We also contract for the national call center that operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week to receive certain emergency calls and for the maintenance of PSAP databases for the purpose of deploying and operating E-911 services. The databases include contact, technical infrastructure, boundary, and routing information for delivery of calls to a PSAP or emergency service providers in the United States. |
| |
| > | Local Number Portability. Our system allows our telephone replacement customers to port telephone numbers, which allows new customers to retain their existing telephone numbers when subscribing to our services. We rely on an agreement with a provider to facilitate the transfer of customer telephone numbers. In addition, we have engaged a provider that performs the third party verification of pertinent local number portability information from our subscribers prior to porting a customer from one local telephone company to us. |
| |
| > | Security. We have developed a service architecture and platform that uses industry-standard security techniques and allows us to remotely manage customer devices. Any Vonage-enabled device used by our customers can be securely managed by us, and these devices use authentication mechanisms to identify themselves to our service in order to place and receive calls. We regularly update our protocols and systems to protect against unauthorized access. |
| |
| > | Internet Protocol (IP) Addresses. Every machine on the Internet has a unique identifying number called an Internet Protocol address or IP address. Though there has been recent publicity surrounding the exhaustion of IP addresses under the current Internet Protocol version, we have procured a supply of addresses that we believe will cover our needs for the foreseeable future. |
4 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
recent publicity surrounding the exhaustion of IP addresses under the current Internet Protocol version, we have procured a supply of addresses that we believe will cover our needs for the foreseeable future.
Our marketing objective is to grow subscriber lines and revenue by cost-effectively acquiring and retaining customers. We employ an integrated multi-channel approach to marketing, whereby we evaluate and focus our efforts on efficient marketing vehicles to accomplish our goals. To do this, we make use of both broad-reaching and highly-targeted media channels in the general market and for specific international long distance markets, including television, direct mail, online, alternative media, telemarketing, partner marketing, and customer referral programs. We regularly evaluate the cost per acquisition by media vehicle and reallocate budgets to identify more
4 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
effective media mixes.
We make use of marketing research to gain consumer insights into brand, product, and service performance, and utilize those learnings to improve our messaging and media plans. Market research is also leveraged in the areas of testing, retention marketing, and product marketing to ensure we bring compelling products and services to market for our customers.
Direct Sales
Our primary sales channels for our home telephone replacement services have been in-bound telemarketing and online direct sales. Customers can subscribe to our services at our websites, http://www.vonage.com, http://www.vonage.ca and http://www.vonage.co.uk, or through multiple toll free numbers including 1-877-4VONAGE. We are also increasing efforts to focus on promising international long distance markets. In 2012,2013, we continued to enhance our complete Spanish language experience for our customers, including 24 hour per day inbound telesales, full customer service, a Spanish language online environment and purchasing experience, television advertising, as well as direct mail. For business customers our primary sales channels include telesales and resellers. Customers can subscribe to our services at our websites, http://www.vonagebusiness.com, http://www.vocalocity.com and http://www.vonagebusinesssolutions.com, or through toll free numbers including 1-877-862-2562.
Retail Sales
In addition to our direct sales channel, we also offer sales through our retail channel. In 2012,2013, we continued to increase our retail presence at leading regional and national retailers, including Walmart, Sears, Kmart, Best Buy, Fry’s Electronics,Kmart, Sears, Brandsmart, Fry's, and Microcenter, and with the addition of Radio Shack we are currently present in over 8,000 locations.Microcenter. We believe that the availability of our devicesservices through premier retailers enhances and reinforces the Vonage brand, and that the retail channel increases our ability to acquire mainstream consumers by reaching them in a familiar and interactive shopping environment. National and regional retailers provide Vonage with a wide footprint to distribute our service.
Community Sales Channels
We have opened Vonage kiosks throughout the United States and continuecontinued to look at ways to optimize sales performance at each kiosk location while looking at growth opportunitiesexpand our presence in favorable geographic markets. We refined our kiosk operations in 2012 by supplementing our fixed cost kiosks with pay for performance cost structures in certain markets. In addition, we have expanded our key market presence in markets with high ethnic concentration with the introduction of community sales teams in 2010.teams. Our community sales teams provide culturally relevant ways to connect with customers at a grass roots level. We expanded our community sales team presence in 20122013 and now operate in over 35 markets across 2018 states and Canada. In addition, we continue to operate Vonage kiosks in certain markets throughout the United States.
Customer Service
We offer our customers support 24 hours a day, seven days a week through both our comprehensive online account management website and our toll free number. Many customers use our self-service website when they have a question or problem with their service and
are able to resolve their concerns online without needing to speak to a customer care representative. Our customers can manage almost all aspects of their accounts online. This capability empowers our customers through self-service and reduces our customer care expenses.
Customers who cannot or do not wish to resolve their questions through our website may contact a customer care representative through our toll free number. We staff our customer care organization through a combination of our own employees and outsourced customer care representatives. All new customer care representatives are trained through an established program developed by Vonage. We also have a separate team that provides advanced technical support for resolving customers’ complex issues. We use extensive monitoring of call quality and customer satisfaction scores to determine additional training or coaching requirements for individual
associates and to drive continuous improvement in our processes, policies, and technology. We offer support in English, Spanish, Tagalog and French Canadian.
Billing
All customer billing for our broadband telephone replacement services is automated through our website. We automatically collect all fees from our customers’ credit card, debit card or electronic check payment (“ECP”). By collecting monthly subscription fees in advance and certain other charges immediately after they are incurred, we are able to reduce the amount of accounts receivable that we have outstanding, thus allowing us to have lower working capital requirements. Collecting in this manner also helps us mitigate bad debt exposure, which is recorded as a reduction to revenue. If a customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP is declined, we generally suspend international calling. Historically, in most cases, we are able to correct the problem with the customer within the current monthly billing cycle. If the customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP cannot be successfully processed during three billing cycles (i.e. the current and two subsequent monthly billing cycles), we terminate the account.
We believe that our technological position depends primarily on the experience, technical expertise, and creative ability of our employees. We routinely review our technological developments with our technology staff and business units to identify the aspects of our technology that provide us with a technological or commercial advantage and file patent applications as necessary to protect our technology in the United States and internationally. Our company policies require our employees to assign their intellectual property rights to us and to treat proprietary know-how and materials as our confidential information.
In addition to developing technology and intellectual property, we evaluate for potential licensing and acquisition technology and intellectual property of third parties to identify opportunities that may provide us with a strategic or commercial advantage in exchange for royalties or other consideration. From time to time we receive letters from third parties inviting us to obtain patent licenses that might be relevant to our business. As a result of these efforts, we have acquired multiple U.S. and foreign patents, and obtained licenses to numerous other patents. From time to time, we also have become involved in litigation alleging that our products or services infringe on third party patents or other intellectual property rights. See “Item 3. - Legal Proceedings-IP Matters.”
We are the owner of numerous United States and international trademarks and service marks and have applied for registration of our trademarks and service marks in the United States and abroad to establish and protect our brand names as part of our intellectual property strategy. Examples of our registered marks include Vonage®, Vonage Mobile®, Vonage Visual Voicemail® and Vonage Extensions®.
5 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
We endeavor to protect our internally developed systems and technologies and maintain our trademarks and service marks. Typically, we enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, customers, and vendors in an effort to control access to and distribution of our technology, software, documentation, and other information.
We face continued strong competition from traditional telephone companies, cable companies, wireless companies, and alternative communication providers.providers in the residential, mobile, SMB and SOHO markets. Because most of our target customers are already purchasing communications services from one or more of these providers, our success is dependent upon our ability to attract these customers away from their existing providers. We believe
5 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
that the principal competitive factors affecting our ability to attract and retain customers are price, call quality, customer service, and enhanced services and features.
Traditional telephone and cable companies
The traditional telephone and cable companies are our primary competitors for our broadband telephone services. Traditional telephone companies in particular have historically dominated their regional markets. These competitors include AT&T, Verizon Communications and CenturyLink, as well as rural incumbents such as Frontier Communications. Cable company competitors include companies such as Cablevision, Charter Communications, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, and Time Warner Cable. These traditional phone and cable company competitors are substantially larger and better capitalized than we are and have the advantage of a large existing customer base. Many of these competitors are continuing to make substantial investments in delivering broadband Internet access, VoIP phone service, and cable television to their customers and they often have larger product development and marketing budgets than us. Providing home phone, Internet access, and cable television to many of our existing and potential customers may enhance their image as trusted providers of services.
The traditional phone and cable companies own networks that include a “last mile” connection to substantially all of our existing and potential domestic customers as well as the places our customers call domestically. As a result, the vast majority of the calls placed by a Vonage customer are carried over the “last mile” by a traditional phone company, and we indirectly pay access charges to these competitors for each of these calls. In contrast, traditional wireline providers do not pay us when their customers call our customers.
Cable companies and, in many cases traditional phone companies, are also aggressively using their existing customer relationships to bundle services. For example, they bundle Internet access, cable television, and home phone service with an implied price for the phone service that may be significantly below ours. In addition, such competitors may in the future require new customers or existing customers making changes to their service to purchase voice services when purchasing high speed Internet access. Certain traditional phone companies are also able to bundle wireless telephone service. Many of these competitors are able to advertise on their local access channels with no significant out-of-pocket cost and through mailings in bills with little marginal cost. They also receive advertising time as part of their relationships with television networks and are able to use this time to promote their telephone service offerings.
Traditional phone and cable companies’ ownership of Internet connections to our customers could enable them to detect and interfere with the completion of our customers’ calls. While we are not aware of any such occurrence, it is unclear whether current regulations would permit these companies to degrade the quality of, give low priority to or block entirely the information packets and other data we transmit over their lines. In addition, these companies may attempt to charge their customers more for using our services.
Many traditional phone and cable companies routinely send technicians to customers’ premises to initiate service. Although this is expensive, it also can be more attractive to customers than installing their own router. In addition, these technicians may install an independent source of power, which can give customers assurance that their phone service will not be interrupted during power outages.
The traditional phone and cable companies have long-standing relationships with regulators, legislators, lobbyists, and the media. This can be an advantage for them because legislative, regulatory or judicial developments in our rapidly evolving industry could have a negative impact on us.
In many cases, we charge prices that are lower than prices charged by the traditional phone and cable companies. In addition, some of our competitors offer low introductory pricing followed by an increase in price after a certain period of time. We believe that these step-up promotions enable us to gain market share by attracting customers who leave our competitors following these price increases. We believe that
we also currently compete successfully with the traditional phone and cable companies on the basis of the features we offer that they may not (such as area code selection, portable service, virtual phone numbers, and readable voice mail). We offer many of these features at no extra charge.
Wireless telephone companies
We also compete with wireless phone companies, such as AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless, for both our broadband telephone services and our mobile services. Some consumers use wireless phones, instead of VoIP phones, as a replacement for a wireline phone. Also, wireless phone companies increasingly are providing wireless broadband Internet access to their customers. As wireless providers offer more minutes at lower prices and other services that improve calling quality, their services have become more attractive to households as a competitive replacement for wireline service. In addition, wireless providers are also offering standalone wireless home services as well as the ability to link multiple devices for telephony service. Wireless telephone companies have a strong retail presence and have significant financial resources. We are developing next-generation services to meet the emerging needs of mobile and other connected device users by delivering easy-to-use applications that provide significant cost savings in large existing markets. We believe that our efforts will capitalize on favorable trends including the proliferation of low or no-cost Wi-Fi and other broadband around the world, accelerating smart phone adoption rates, and the growth of social communities.
Alternative communication providers
We also compete against alternative communication providers such as magicJack, Skype, and Google Voice, some of which are larger than us and have the ability to devote greater resources to their communications services. Some of these service providers, including Internet product and software companies, have chosen to sacrifice telephony revenue in order to gain market share or attract users to their platform and have offered their services at low prices or for free. While not all of these competitors currently offer the ability to call or be called by anyone not using their service, line portability, E911 service, and customer service, in the future they may integrate such capabilities into their service offerings. As we continue the introduction of applications that integrate different forms of voice, messaging, and other services over multiple devices, we face competition from emerging competitors focused on similar integration, as well as from alternative communication providers.
There is a continuing trend toward consolidation of telecommunications companies, including the acquisition of alternative communication providers by Internet product and software companies with significant resources. In addition, certain of our competitors have partnered and may in the future partner with other competitors to offer products and services, leveraging their collective competitive positions. We also are subject to the risk of future disruptive technologies, which could give rise to significant new competition.
6 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
In connection with our increasing emphasis on the international long distance market, we face competition from low-cost international calling cards and VoIP providers in addition to traditional telephone companies, cable companies, and wireless companies.
In connection with our Vonage Business Solutions SMB and SOHO markets, we face competition from the traditional telephone and cable companies discussed above, as well as from SMB communications providers such as 8x8, Ring Central, and other companies.
|
|
| FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS |
For information regarding the Company's revenues and long-lived assets attributable to our U.S. and foreign countries for the last three fiscal years see Note 13 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 20122013, we had 9831,243 employees. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
We were incorporated in Delaware in May 2000 and changed our name to Vonage Holdings Corp. in February 2001. We maintain a website with the address www.vonage.com. TheReferences to our website are provided as a convenience, and the information contained on our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference
6 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than an investor’s own Internet access charges, we make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished such material to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (SEC). Copies are also available, without charge, by writing to Vonage’s Investor Relations Department at Vonage Holdings Corp., 23 Main Street, Holmdel, NJ 07733 or calling us at 732.365.1328 or sending an email through the Vonage Investor Relations website at http://ir.vonage.com/. Reports filed with the SEC may be viewed at www.sec.gov or obtained at the SEC Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
7 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks below, as well as all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating our company and our business. Any of these risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our common stock.
For the financial information discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than per share and per line amounts, dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except where noted.
If we are unable to compete successfully, we could lose market share and revenue.
The telecommunications industry is highly competitive. We face continued intense competition from traditional telephone companies, cable companies, wireless companies, and alternative communication providers. Our competitors include the traditional telephone service providers, including AT&T, Verizon Communications, and CenturyLink, which provide telephone service based on the public switched telephone network. Some of these traditional providers also have added VoIP services to their existing telephone and broadband offerings. We also face competition from cable companies, such as Cablevision, Charter Communications, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, and Time Warner Cable. Traditional telephone service providers and cable companies have added VoIP services to their existing bundled cable television and broadband offerings. Further, as wireless providers, including AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless, offer more minutes at lower prices, better coverage, and companion landline alternative services, their services have become more attractive to households as a replacement for wireline service.
Most traditional wireline and wireless telephone service providers and cable companies are substantially larger and better capitalized than we are and have the advantage of greater name and brand name recognition and a large existing customer base. Because most of our target customers are already purchasing communications services from one or more of these providers, our success is dependent upon our ability to attract target customers away from their existing providers. Our competitors' financial resources may allow them to offer services at prices below cost or even for free in order to maintain and gain market share or otherwise improve their competitive positions. Our competitors also could use their greater financial resources to develop and market telephony and messaging services with more attractive features and more robust customer service. In addition, because of the other services our competitors provide, they often choose to offer VoIP services as part of a bundle that includes other products, such as video, high speed Internet access, and wireless telephone service, which we do not offer. This bundle may enable our competitors to offer VoIP service at prices with which we may not be able to compete or to offer functionality that integrates VoIP service with their other offerings, both of which may be more desirable to consumers. Any of these competitive factors could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain customers, reduce our market share and revenues, or cause us to lower our prices or offer additional features that may result in additional costs without commensurate price increases.
We also compete against alternative communication providers, such as magicJack, Skype, and Google Voice, some of which are larger than us, have greater name and brand recognition, and have the ability to devote greater resources to their communications services. Some of these service providers, including Internet product and software companies, have chosen to sacrifice telephony revenue in order to gain market share or attract customers to their platform or have lower cost structures and have offered their services at low prices or for free or are using different payment structures such as one-time or low annual fees. As we continue the introduction of applications that integrate different forms of voice and messaging services over multiple devices, we face
competition from emerging competitors focused on similar integration, as well as from established alternative communication providers. In order to compete with such service providers, we may have to reduce our prices, which would impair our profitability, or offer additional features that may cause us to incur additional costs without commensurate price increases.
We also face competition from SMB communications providers such as 8x8, RingCentral, and other companies. To the extent that these SMB providers strengthen their offerings to small and medium businesses, we may have to reduce our prices, increase promotions, or offer additional features, which may adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
In connection with our increasing emphasis on the international long distance market, we face competition from low-cost international calling cards, digital calling cards and VoIP providers in addition to traditional telephone companies, cable companies, and wireless companies. To the extent that these providers target marketing to the same ethnic segments that we target or strengthen their offerings to these segments, we may have to reduce our prices or increase promotions, which would impair our profitability, or offer additional features that may cause us to incur additional costs without commensurate price increase.
As a result of increasing competition, domestic and international telephony and messaging rates have generally decreased during the past few years, and we expect this trend to continue. Continued rate pressures or increasing cost to use our services could lessen or eliminate the pricing advantage that we maintain over certain competitors and cause customers or potential customers to select alternative providers or cause us to lower our prices, which would adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
If we fail to adapt to rapid changes in the market for voice and messaging services, then our products and services could become obsolete.
The market for our products and services is constantly and rapidly evolving as we and our competitors introduce new and enhanced products and services and react to changes in VoIP and messaging technology and customer demands. We may not be able to develop or acquire new products and plans or product and plan enhancements that compete effectively with present or emerging VoIP and messaging technologies or differentiate our products and plans based on functionality and performance. In addition, we may not be able to establish or maintain strategic alliances that will permit enhancement opportunities or innovative distribution methods for our products and plans.
To address these issues, we are targeting revenue growth in large, existing international and mobile markets. Our growth initiatives, focused on our core domestic market, including the international long distance market,and SMB markets, international expansion, and mobile markets, require us to enhance our current products and plans, and develop new products and plans on a timely basis to keep pace with market needs and satisfy the increasingly sophisticated requirements of customers. For example, in early 2012,2013 we introduced Vonage Mobile,acquired Vocalocity, Inc. to increase our all-in-one mobile application that provides free calling and messaging between users who havepenetration of the application, as well as traditional paid international calling to any other phone. Vonage Mobile is downloadable for free.hosted VoIP SMB market. In the future, we may enhance this service or introduce other similar services for mobile and other connected devices. These services may include optional added cost premium services such as international calling plans, alternatives for high priced international roaming services, and lower cost text messaging.services. If we are unable to attract users of these premium services offered by Vonage Mobile or future offerings, our net revenues may fail to grow as we expect.
VoIP and messaging technology is complex, and new products and plans and enhancements to existing products and plans can require long development and testing periods. Any delays in developing and releasing new or enhanced products and plans could cause us to lose revenue opportunities and customers. Any technical flaws in products we release could diminish the innovative impact of the products and have a negative effect on customer adoption and our reputation.
8 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
We also are subject to the risk of future disruptive technologies. New products based on new technologies or new industry
8 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
standards could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. If new technologies develop that are able to deliver competing voice and messaging services at lower prices, better or more conveniently, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
If we are unsuccessful at retaining customers or attracting new customers, including customers who pay for our services for mobile and other internet connected devices, we may experience a reduction in revenue or may be required to spend more money or alter our marketing approaches to grow our customer base.
Our rate of customer terminations for our broadband telephone replacement services, or average monthly customer churn, was 2.6%2.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013. During 2012,2013, we added 570,316608,734 customers while 629,984607,227 of our customers terminated their service. Our churn rate could increase in the future if customers are not satisfied with the quality and reliability of our network, the value proposition of our products, and the ability of our customer service to meet the needs and expectations of our customers. In addition, competition from traditional telephone companies, cable companies, wireless companies, alternative communications providers, and low-cost international calling cards, disruptive technologies, general economic conditions, and our ability to activate and register new customers on the network, also influence our churn rate. We will have similar issues with customers for Vonage Mobile and other services for mobile and other Internet connected devices as that business develops.
As we continue to emphasize the international long distance market, we expect our churn to be impacted by the ethnic segments that we target. For example, we have found that certain ethnic segments have higher churn due to inability to use our existing payment methods. We may not be able to educate these customers in these payment methods or offer alternative payment methods that serve the needs of these customers. In addition, higher proportions of certain ethnic segments that we target may be more likely to have poor or no credit history, indicating that they may have more difficulty affording the service, leading to higher churn for these customers.
Because of customer losses, we have to acquire new customers on an ongoing basis just to maintain our existing level of customers and revenues. As a result, marketing expense, and the effectiveness of our marketing vendors, is an ongoing requirement to maintain or grow our business. If our churn rate increases, we will have to acquire even more new customers in order to maintain our existing revenues. We incur significant costs to acquire new customers, and expect to continue to do so in connection with the execution of our growth initiatives, and those costs are an important factor in maintaining profitability. Therefore, if we are unsuccessful in retaining customers, are required to spend significant amounts to acquire new customers beyond those budgeted, or our marketing and advertising efforts are not effective in targeting specific customer segments, we may be forced to change marketing approaches or marketing vendors, our revenue could decrease or we could incur losses.
If we are unable to establish and expand effective strategic relationships our ability to grow revenues and offer new products under commercially attractive terms may be inhibited, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
An element of our growth strategy is to develop and maintain strategic relationships both in the U.S. and internationally. We have or are pursuing relationships in the U.S. retail industry as well as international opportunities ranging from joint venture arrangements to providing full VoIP communication services to be marketed and distributed as a complement to an existing foreign provider's product suite. The continued development of these relationships may assist us in
enhancing our brand, introducing our products and services to larger numbers of customers, developing and implementing new products and
services, and generating additional revenue. We may not be able to enter into new relationships in the U.S. or internationally on economic terms favorable to us. In addition, if we lose any of our important strategic relationships or if strategic relationships fail to benefit us as expected, our ability to grow revenues and offer new products may be inhibited, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. For example, we arecontinue to be increasingly reliant upon relationships with mass merchant retailers and our shift to assisted selling programs. The loss or deterioration of these relationships could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, inefficiencies or fraud on the part of mass merchant retailers or vendors associated with our assisted selling programs could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our international long distance business and our expanding international operations are increasingly subject to country-specific governmental regulation and related actions and taxes that may increase our costs or impact our product offerings.
As we execute on our growth initiatives and expand our international operations into new geographies, we expect to become subject to numerous additional governmental regulations, including telecommunications, licensing, data retention and transfer, privacy, consumer protection, financial, emergency services and law enforcement, and other applicable laws and regulations. Some of these regulations may be complicated or unsettled. Any failure to comply with governmental regulation could result in fines, penalties, or other governmental action, including criminal action, and may damage our brand and reputation. In addition, changes in legislation or regulations and actions by regulators, including changes in administration and enforcement policies, may from timeexpose us to timeunknown civil and criminal risks, may require modifications to our offerings, or may expose us to the payment of fines and penalties,penalties. These risks may cause us to exit these markets should such changes adversely impact our revenues, profitability, or both.our ability to compete.
In the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom, we are not a regulated telecommunications business. Our services are also in use in countries outside of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, where we have regular operations, including countries where providing VoIP services is or may be illegal. We may need to change our service offerings to avoid regulation as a telecommunications business in a jurisdiction, or if we are treated as a regulated telecommunications business, we may be required to incur additional expenses. In addition, if governments believe that we are providing unauthorized service in their countries, they may pursue fines, penalties, or other governmental action, including criminal action, that may damage our brand and reputation. If we use a local partner to provide services in a country and the local partner does not comply with applicable governmental regulations, we may face additional regulation, liabilities, penalties or other governmental action, and our brand and reputation may be harmed.
In addition to the risk of being directly subjected to regulation, decisions by foreign regulators to increase the charge for terminating international calls into their countries may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain international long distance customers in the U.S., U.K., and Canada. For example, our Vonage World offering includes calling to over 60 countries. Regulatory actions in any of these countries could cause increased costs, impact margin, cause us to remove a country from Vonage World, and impact churn and gross line additions. These regulatory actions may be taken without notice and cause us to react quickly to changing market conditions. These efforts could divert management’s efforts and attention from ordinary business operations which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
As a United States-based company, any foreign subsidiary or joint venture that we use for international operations may be subject to a variety of governmental regulations in the countries where we market our products, including tariffs and taxes. For example, distributions of earnings and other payments, including interest, received from our foreign subsidiaries may be subject to withholding taxes imposed by the jurisdiction in which such entities are formed or
9 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
operating, which will reduce the amount of after-tax cash we can receive. In general, as a United States corporation, we may claim a foreign tax credit against our federal income tax expense for such foreign withholding taxes and for foreign income taxes paid directly by foreign
9 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
corporate entities in which we own 10% or more of the voting stock. The ability to claim such foreign tax credits and to utilize net foreign losses is, however, subject to numerous limitations, and we may incur incremental tax costs as a result of these limitations or because we are not currently in a tax-paying position in the United States. We may also be required to include in our income for United States federal income tax purposes our proportionate share of certain earnings of those foreign subsidiaries that are classified as “controlled foreign corporations” without regard to whether distributions have been actually received from such subsidiaries.
As we expand our international operations into new geographies, we will be increasingly subject to risks that are inherent in operating abroad, including country-specific market and competitive risks, currency restrictions and other restraints.
International markets are competitive, and our international operations will be subject to risks in identifying and addressing international markets. In addition to facing global competitors, we may face local competitors with greater knowledge of local markets. Depending upon our method of entry into these markets, we may be subject to risks associated with infrastructure build out in foreign markets and attracting and retaining experienced key employees for any new foreign subsidiaries. We may also become more dependent on the economies of the markets in which we have operations. These markets are expected to be in countries with economies in various stages of development or structural reform, and our operations in such markets also could be affected by:
| |
| > | political, social and economic instability; |
| |
| > | war, civil disturbance or acts of terrorism; |
| |
| > | taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation; |
| |
| > | imposition of limitations on conversions of foreign currencies into United States dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; |
| |
| > | impositions or increase of investment and other restrictions or requirements by foreign governments. |
Our international operations involve transactions in a variety of currencies. Our financial results may be significantly affected by fluctuations of currency exchange rates. To the extent that foreign subsidiaries distribute dividends in local currencies in the future, the amount of cash to be received by us will be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, and such shifts in the currency exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on us. We do not maintain derivatives for managing foreign currency exchange rate risks.
OurSome of our research and development personnel and facilityfacilities are located in Israel. Political, economic and military conditions in Israel directly affect our operations. For example, increased violence or armed conflict in Israel or the Palestinian territories may disrupt travel and communications in the region, harming our operations there. Furthermore, some of our employees in Israel are obligated to perform up to 36 days of military reserve duty annually and may be called to active duty in a time of crisis. The absence of these employees for significant periods may cause us to operate inefficiently during these periods.
A number of our agreements are governed by the laws of, and subject to dispute resolution in the courts of, or through arbitration proceedings in, the country or region in which the operations are located. We cannot accurately predict whether such forum will provide us with
an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes that may arise in the future. Even if we are able to obtain a satisfactory decision through arbitration or a court proceeding, we could have difficulty enforcing any award or judgment on a timely basis. Our ability to obtain or enforce
relief in the United States is uncertain.
We may face difficulties related to entry into joint ventures or the future acquisition or integration of additional businesses, which could harm our growth or operating results.
As we execute on our growth initiatives, we may elect to enter into joint venture arrangements or acquire additional businesses or assets.assets, such as our acquisition of Vocalocity in 2013. These activities may require substantial management time and resources. We cannot predict or guarantee that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or consummate any acquisition or joint venture arrangement. In addition, acquisitions of existing businesses involve substantial risks, including the risk that we may not be able to integrate the operations, personnel, services, or technologies, the potential disruption of our ongoing businesses, the diversion of management attention, the maximization of financial and strategic opportunities, the difficulty in developing or maintaining controls and procedures, and the dilution to our existing stockholders from the issuance of additional shares of common stock. As a result of these and other risks, we may not produce anticipated revenue, profitability, or synergies.
Future acquisitionsAcquisitions may require us to issue equity securities, use our cash resources, incur debt or contingent liabilities, amortize intangibles, or write-off acquisition-related expenses. If we are unable to successfully integrate any acquired businesses or assets we may not receive the intended benefits of such acquisition. In addition, we cannot predict market reactions to any acquisitions we may make or to any failure to announce any future acquisitions.
Further, while we conduct due diligence in connection with acquisition and joint venture opportunities, there may be risks or liabilities that such due diligence efforts fail to discover, are not disclosed to us, or that we inadequately assess. The discovery of material liabilities associated with acquisitions or joint venture opportunities, economic risks faced by joint venture partners, or any failure of joint venture partners to perform their obligations could harmadversely affect our operating results.business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We market our products and services to small and medium-sized businesses, which may be disproportionately impacted by fluctuations in economic conditions.
We market Vonage Business Solutions products to small and medium-sized businesses. Customers in this SMB market may be affected by economic downturns to a greater extent, and may have more limited financial resources, than larger or more established businesses. If customers in the SMB market experience financial hardship as a result of a weak economy, the demand for our services could be materially and adversely affected.
Certain rights to third party patents and technology may expire and not be extended, or may not be available, which may decrease the quality of our products or services or subject us to liability.
Certain previously disclosed patent rights licensed to the Company under our agreement with AT&T have expired. We may attempt to pursue extensions of such licenses. If we are unable to do so on terms acceptable to us, our making, using, and selling of certain of our existing and future products and services may be subject to claims of infringement under patents previously subject to these licenses if we do not make changes. In addition, we may seek to obtain rights to other third party technology in the future, but may not be able to agree upon commercially reasonable terms or at all with respect to obtaining such rights. If we are unable to extend existing licenses or are unable to obtain rights to other technology that may be commercially advantageous or necessary for our product
10 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and service offerings, we may experience a decrease in the quality of our products or services or we may lose the ability to provide our products and services on a non-infringing basis until alternative technology or suitable alternative products and services can be developed, identified, obtained (through acquisition, license or other grants of rights), and integrated.
We may be subject to damaging and disruptive intellectual property litigation that could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, as well as the continued viability of our company.
There has been substantial litigation in the VoIP, telecommunications and related industries regarding intellectual property rights and, given the rapid technological change in our industry and our continual development of new products and services, we and/or our commercial partners may be subject to infringement claims from time to time. For example, we may be unaware of filed patent applications and issued patents that could include claims that might be interpreted to cover our products and services. We werehave been subject to patent infringement claims in the past, including suits that we settled in 2007 and 2008 for a total of $243,825 with Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, Nortel Networks, and others. We are also currently named as a defendant in twofive suits that relate to alleged patent infringement, and from time to time we receive letters from third parties initiatingoffering an opportunity for us to obtain licenses to patents that may be relevant to our business or alleging that our services infringe upon third party patents or other intellectual property. See “Item 3. - Legal Proceedings-IP Matters.”
10 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
Parties making claims of infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to provide our services and could cause us to pay substantial royalties, licensing fees, damages or settlement fees. The defense of any lawsuit could divert management’s efforts and attention from ordinary business operations and result in time-consuming and expensive litigation, regardless of the merits of such claims. These outcomes may:
| |
| > | result in the loss of a substantial number of existing customers or prohibit the acquisition of new customers; |
| |
| > | cause us to accelerate expenditures to preserve existing revenues; |
| |
| > | cause existing or new vendors to require prepayments or letters of credit; |
| |
| > | cause our credit card processors to demand reserves or letters of credit or make holdbacks; |
| |
| > | result in substantial employee layoffs; |
| |
| > | materially and adversely affect our brand in the marketplace and cause a substantial loss of goodwill; |
| |
| > | cause our stock price to decline significantly or otherwise cause us to fail to meet the continued listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, which could distract management and result in the delisting of our common stock from the exchange;significantly; |
| |
| > | materially and adversely affect our liquidity, including our ability to pay debts and other obligations as they become due; |
| |
| > | cause us to change our business methods or services; |
| |
| > | require us to cease certain business operations or offering certain products and services; and |
| |
| > | lead to our bankruptcy or liquidation. |
If we fail to protect our internally developed systems and software and our trademarks, we may become involved in costly litigation or our business or brand may be harmed.
Our ability to compete effectively is dependent in large part upon the maintenance and protection of systems and software that we
have developed internally based on open standards. While we own eighteen internally developed37 issued U.S. issued patents (and a number of foreign patents), have a number of and more than 200 pending patent applications, and have acquired third party patents, we cannot patent much of the technology that is important to our business. Our pending patent applications may not be granted. Any issued patent that we own may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated, or circumvented. To date, we have relied on patent, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements, to establish and protect our rights to this technology. We typically enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, customers, and vendors in an effort to control access to and distribution of technology, software, documentation, and other information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use this technology without authorization. Policing unauthorized use of this technology is difficult. The steps we take may not prevent misappropriation of the technology we rely on. In addition, effective protection may be unavailable or limited in some jurisdictions outside the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or protect our rights or to determine the validity and scope of the rights of others. That litigation could cause us to incur substantial costs and divert resources away from our daily business, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business.
The unlicensed use of our brand by third parties could harm
our reputation, cause confusion among our customers, and impair our ability to market our services. To that end, we have registered numerous trademarks and service marks and have applied for registration of our trademarks and service marks in the United States and abroad to establish and protect our brand names as part of our intellectual property strategy. If our applications receive objections or are successfully opposed by third parties, it will be difficult for us to prevent third parties from using our brand without our permission. Moreover, successful opposition to our applications might encourage third parties to make additional oppositions or commence trademark infringement proceedings against us, which could be costly and time consuming to defend against. If we decide to take limited or no action to protect our trademarks, our trademark rights may be diluted and subject to challenge or invalidation, which could materially and adversely affect our brand in the marketplace.
Security breaches and other cybersecurity or technological risks could compromise our information, systems and network and expose us to liability, including a failure to meet Payment Card Industry data security standards, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
There are several inherent risks to engaging in a technology business, including our reliance on our data centers and networks, and the use and interconnectivity of those networks. A significant portion of our operations relies heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, storage, and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. As seen in our industry and others, these activities have been, and will continue to be, subject to continually evolving cybersecurity or other technological risks. In addition, physical security of devices located within our offices, and/or remote devices, pose cybersecurity and other technological risks that could negatively impact our business and reputation.
We also operate Internet based, worldwide voice, video communications, and messaging services and electronic billing, which require the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks that may or may not be secure end to end. Despite our security measures, which include the development of systems and processes that are designed to protect consumer information and prevent fraudulent credit card transactions and other security breaches, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to error, malfeasance or other disruptions by ana current or former employee or third-party provider.provider and our failure
11 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
to mitigate such fraud or breaches may adversely affect our operating results. Any such breach could compromise our systems and network and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, regulatory penalties, disruption to our operations, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in our products and services, and our ability to keep personally identifiable information confidential, which could adversely affect our business.
We have recently been subject to cyber incidents from external sources including a “brute force” cyber incident, which resulted in unauthorized access to limited customer account data and interruptions of services to customers;“brute force” and distributed denial of service attacks, which attempted to interrupt our ability to provide service to customers.attacks. Although these incidents did not have a material adverse effect financially or on our ability to provide services, this may not continue to be the case going forward. There can be no assurance that similar incidents, or other cyber incidents will not occur in the future, potentially more frequently and/or on a more significant scale.
We have taken steps designed to improve the security of our networks and computer systems.systems and our physical space. Despite these defensive measures, there can be no assurance that we are adequately protecting our information or that we will not experience future incidents. The expenses associated with protecting our information could reduce our operating margins. We maintain insurance intended to cover some of these risks, however, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from any future breaches of our systems. In addition, third parties with which we do business may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions, which results in the storage and processing of customer information by third parties. While we engage in certain actions to reduce the exposure resulting from outsourcing, unauthorized access, loss or destruction of data or other cyber incidents could occur, resulting in similar costs and consequences as those discussed above.
We make available on our website our privacy policy, which
11 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
describes how we collect, use, and disclose our customers' personal information. As we expand our international operations into new geographies, we may become subject to local data security, privacy, data retention, and disclosure laws and regulations. It may be difficult for us to comply with these laws and regulations if they were deemed to be applicable to us.
We are subject to Payment Card Industry (“PCI”(“PCI”) data security standards, which require periodic audits by independent third parties to assess compliance. PCI data security standards are a comprehensive set of requirements for enhancing payment account data security that was developed by the PCI Security Standards Council including American Express, Discover Financial Services, JCB International, MasterCard Worldwide, and VISA Inc., to help facilitate the broad adoption of consistent data security measures. Failure to comply with the security requirements as identified in subsequent audits or rectify a security issue may result in fines. While we believe it is unusual, restrictions on accepting payment cards, including a complete restriction, may be imposed on companies that are not compliant. Further, the law relating to the liability of providers of online payment services is currently unsettled and states may enact their own rules with which we may not comply.
We rely on third party providers to process and guarantee payments made by Vonage and its affiliates’ subscribers, up to certain limits, and we may be unable to prevent our customers from fraudulently receiving goods and services. Our liability risk will increase if a larger fraction of our Vonage transactions involve fraudulent or disputed credit card transactions. Any costs we incur as a result of fraudulent or disputed transactions could harm our business. In addition, the functionality of our current billing system relies on certain third party vendors delivering services. If these vendors are unable or unwilling to provide services, we will not be able to charge for our services in a timely or scalable fashion, which could significantly decrease our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The storage, processing, and use of personal information and related data subjects us to evolving
governmental laws and regulation, commercial standards, contractual obligations, and other legal obligations related to consumer and data privacy, which may have a material impact on our costs, use of our products and services, or expose us to increased liability.
Federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, commercial obligations and industry standards, each provide for obligations and restrictions with respect to data privacy and security, as well as the collection, storage, retention, protection, use, processing, transmission, sharing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other customer data. The evolving nature of these obligations and restrictions dictates that differing interpretations, inconsistency or conflicts among countries or rules, and general uncertainty impact the application to our business.
These obligations and restrictions may limit our ability to collect, store, process, use, transmit and share data with our customers, and to allow our customers to collect, store, retain, protect, use, process, transmit, share and disclose data with others through our products and services. Compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such obligations and restrictions could increase the cost of our operations and impact our ability to market our products and services through effective segmentation.
Failure to comply with obligations and restrictions related to applicable data protection laws, regulations, standards, and codes of conduct, as well as our own posted privacy policies and contractual commitments could subject us to lawsuits, fines, criminal penalties, statutory damages, consent decrees, injunctions, adverse publicity, loss of user confidence in our services, and loss of users, which could materially harm our business. Additionally, third-party contractors may have access to customer data. If these or other third-party vendors violate obligations and restrictions related to applicable data protection laws or our policies, such violations may also put our customers’ information at risk and could in turn have a material and adverse effect on our business.
We rely on third parties to provide a portion of our customer service representatives, provide aspects of our E-911 service, and initiate local number portability for our customers. If these third parties do not provide our customers with reliable, high-quality service, our reputation will be harmed and we may lose customers.
We offer our customers support 24 hours a day, seven days a week through both our comprehensive online account management website and our toll free number. Our customer support is currently provided via United States based employees as well as third party partners located in the United States, Philippines, Costa Rica, Chile, Mexico, and India. We offer support in English, Spanish, and French Canadian. Our third-party providers generally represent us without identifying themselves as independent parties. The ability to support our customers may be disrupted by natural disasters, inclement weather conditions, civil unrest, and other adverse events in the locations where our customer support is provided.
We also contract for services required to provide E-911 services including assistance in routing emergency calls, terminating E-911 calls, operating a national call center that is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to receive certain emergency calls, and maintaining PSAP databases for the purpose of deploying and operating E-911 services. Interruptions in service from our vendor could cause failures in our customers’ access to E-911 services and expose us to liability and damage our reputation.
We also have agreements with companies that initiate our local number portability, which allow new customers to retain their existing telephone numbers when subscribing to our services.
If any of these third parties do not provide reliable, high-quality service, our reputation and our business will be harmed. In addition,
12 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
industry consolidation among providers of services to us may impact our ability to obtain these services or increase our expense for these services.
Our ability to provide our telephony service and manage related customer accounts is dependent upon third-party facilities, equipment, and systems, the failure of which could cause delays of or interruptions to our service, damage our reputation, cause us to lose customers, limit our growth, and affect our financial condition.
Our success depends on our ability to provide quality and reliable telephony service, which is in part dependent upon the proper functioning of facilities and equipment owned and operated by third parties and is, therefore, beyond our control. Unlike traditional wireline telephone service or wireless service, our telephony service requires our customers to have an operative broadband Internet connection and
an electrical power supply, which are provided by the customer's Internet service provider and electric utility company, respectively, and not by us. The quality of some broadband Internet connections may be too poor for customers to use our telephony services properly. In addition, if there is any interruption to a customer's broadband Internet service or electrical power supply, that customer will be unable to make or receive calls, including emergency calls, using our telephony service.
We outsource several of our network functions to third-party providers. For example, we outsource the maintenance of our regional data connection points, which are the facilities at which our network interconnects with the public switched telephone network. If our third-party service providers fail to maintain these facilities properly, or fail to respond quickly to problems, our customers may experience service interruptions. Interruptions in our service caused by third-party facilities have in the past caused and may in the future cause us to lose customers or cause us to offer substantial customer credits, which could adversely affect our revenue and profitability. If interruptions adversely affect the perceived reliability of our service, we may have difficulty attracting new customers, and our brand, reputation, and growth will be negatively impacted.
In order to access our residential, small office, and home office services, a customer needs to connect a standard telephone to a broadband Internet connection through a Vonage-enabled device that we provide. Although we closely monitor inventory levels, if we are unable to procure a sufficient number of devices from our suppliers in a timely manner, including as a result of a failure by a component supplier, we would be delayed in activating new customers and may lose these customers.
Flaws in our technology and systems or our failure to adapt our systems to any new Internet Protocol could cause delays or interruptions of service, which could damage our reputation, cause us to lose customers, and limit our growth.
Although we have designed our service network to reduce the possibility of disruptions or other outages, our service may be disrupted by problems with our technology and systems, such as malfunctions in our Vonage-enabled device that we provide to customers, software or facilities and overloading of our network. As we attract new subscribers, we expect increased call volume that we need to manage to avoid network interruptions. In particular, as we have marketed to different international long distance markets, we have seen international call volumes to targeted countries increase. During the next few years we expect wide-spread industry adoption of a new Internet Protocol, which is a set of standard communications and routing mechanisms. Customers may experience periodic delays of service caused by the industry transition to this new Internet Protocol. Interruptions have caused and may in the future cause us to lose customers and offer substantial customer credits, which could adversely affect our revenue and profitability. Network interruptions have also impaired our ability at times to sign-up new customers and the ability of
customers to manage their accounts. During 2012, we had outages that affected groups of customers at various times, some of which affected large groups of customers for several hours. If service interruptions or other outages adversely affect the perceived reliability of our telephony service or customer service, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining customers and our brand reputation and growth may suffer.
In addition, we utilize third-party Internet-based or “cloud” computing services in connection with some of our business operations. Any disruption to the internet or to our third-party Web hosting or cloud computing providers, including technological or business-related disruptions, could adversely impact the experience of our customers and have adverse effects on our operations. In addition, fires, floods, earthquakes, power losses, telecommunications failures, and similar "Acts of God" could damage these systems and hardware or cause them to fail completely. We do not maintain entirely redundant systems, thus such an event could result in downtime for our operations and could adversely affect our business.
Our services are subject to regulation in the United
12 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
States, United Kingdom, and Canada, and future legislative, regulatory or judicial actions could adversely affect our business and expose us to liability.
Our business has developed in a relatively lightly regulated environment. However, the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada have applied some traditional telephone company regulations to VoIP and continue to evaluate how VoIP should be regulated. The effects of future regulatory developments are uncertain.
In At the United States, interconnected VoIP providers, such as Vonage, are subject to certainfederal level in the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"(“FCC”) rules. For example,has imposed certain telecommunications regulations on August 5, 2005,VoIP services including:
| |
| > | Requirements to provide E911 service; |
| |
| > | Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) obligations; |
| |
| > | Obligation to support Universal Service; |
| |
| > | Customer Proprietary Network Information (“CPNI”) requirements; |
| |
| > | Disability access obligations; |
| |
| > | Local Number Portability requirements; |
| |
| > | Service discontinuance notification obligations; |
| |
| > | Outage reporting requirements; and |
| |
| > | Rural call completion reporting and rules related to ring signal integrity. |
In general, the focus of interconnected VoIP telecommunications regulation is at the federal level. On November 12, 2004, the FCC released an Order extendingissued a declaratory ruling providing that our service is subject to federal regulation and preempted the obligationsMinnesota Public Utilities Commission from imposing certain of its regulations on us. While this ruling does not exempt us from all state oversight of our service, it effectively prevents state telecommunications regulators from imposing certain burdensome and inconsistent market entry requirements and certain other state utility rules and regulations on our service. As such, Vonage is subject to relatively few state regulatory requirements including:
| |
| > | Payment of state and local E911 fees; and |
| |
| > | State Universal Service support obligations. |
| |
| > | In Canada, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC”) regulates VoIP service. CRTC VoIP regulations include: |
| |
| > | Requirement to provide 911 service; and |
| |
| > | Local Number Portability requirements. |
| |
| > | In the UK, we are subject to regulation in the UK by the Office |
13 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
of Communications (“OFCOM”). OFCOM VoIP regulations include:
| |
| > | Requirement to provide 999/112 service; and |
| |
| > | Number Portability requirements. |
Vonage seeks to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements. We could, however, be subject to regulatory enforcement action if a regulator does not believe that we are complying with applicable regulations.
In addition, the Communications Assistanceregulatory framework for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) to interconnected VoIP providers. Under CALEA, telecommunications carriers must assist law enforcement in executing electronic surveillance, which include the capability of providing call contentservice is still evolving and call-identifying information to a local enforcement agency, or LEA, pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization. Weit is possible that Vonage could be subject to an enforcement action by the FCC if our CALEA solution is deemed not fully operational.
Effective February 2, 2011, another FCC order reduced to one business day the amount of time that a telecommunications provider such as Vonage has to port a telephone number to another provider. If we, additional regulatory obligations and/or third parties we rely upon for porting, have difficulty complying with the one-day porting requirement, weexisting regulatory obligations could be subject to FCC enforcement action.
modified or expanded. The effects of future regulatory developments are uncertain. Future legislative, judicial or other regulatory actions could have a negative effect on our business. If we become subject to the rules and regulations applicable to telecommunications providers in individual states, we may incur significant litigation and compliance costs, and we may have to restructure our service offerings, exit certain markets, or raise the price of our services, any of which could cause our services to be less attractive to customers. In addition, future regulatory developments could increase our cost of doing business and limit our growth.
We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, and similar laws, and any determination that we violated any of these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act ("FCPA"), the UK Bribery Act and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by persons and entities for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have operations, agreements with third parties, and make sales internationally. In addition, we plan to expand our international operations through potential joint ventures with local partners. Our international activities create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, consultants, partners, sales agents or distributors, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. It is our policy to prohibit these practices by our employees, consultants, partners, sales agents or distributors, However,however, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and our employees, consultants, partners, sales agents or distributors may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act or other laws may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We may incur significant costs and harm to our reputation from lawsuits and regulatory inquiries related to our business practices, which may also divert the attention of our management from other aspects of our business.
We have been subject to periodic regulatory inquiries
regarding our business practices, including an investigation settled in 2009 with a group of 32 states' attorneys general into certain of our business practices. There was no finding of any violation or wrongdoing by us, and the 32 states participating in the settlement have released us and our affiliates from the matters investigated. On July 18, 2011, we entered into an amended settlement agreement initiated at our request to reflect revised business practices associated with our new “consumable” product offerings. Any similar claims or regulatory inquiries, whether successful or not, could require us to devote significant amounts of monetary or human resources to defend ourselves and could harm our reputation. We may need to spend significant amounts on our legal defense, senior management may be required to divert their attention from other portions of our business, new product launches may be deferred or canceled as a result of any
proceedings, and we may be required to make changes to our present and planned products or services. If, as a result of any proceedings, a judgment is rendered or a decree is entered against us, it may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and harm our reputation.
Third parties may fraudulently use our name to obtain access to customer accounts and other personal information, use our services to commit fraud or steal our services, which could damage our reputation, limit our growth, and cause us to incur additional expenses.
Our customers have been subject to “phishing,” which occurs when a third party calls or sends an email or pop-up message to a customer that claims to be from a business or organization that provides services to the customer. The purpose of the inquiry is typically to encourage the customer to visit a bogus website designed to look like a website operated by the legitimate business or organization or provide information to the operator. At the bogus website, the operator attempts to trick the customer into divulging customer account or other personal information such as credit card information or to introduce viruses through “trojan horse” programs to the customers’ computers. This has resulted in identity theft from our customers and the unauthorized use of Vonage services. Third parties have also used our communications services to commit fraud. Although we have engaged a third party to assist in the shutdown of purported phishing sites, if we are unable to detect and prevent “phishing,” use of our services for fraud, and similar activities, our brand reputation and growth may suffer and we may incur additional costs, including costs to increase security, or be required to credit significant amounts to customers.
Third parties also have used our communications services without paying, including by submitting fraudulent credit card information. This has resulted in our incurring the cost of providing the services, including incurring call termination fees, without any corresponding revenues. We have implemented anti-fraud procedures in order to limit the expenses resulting from theft of service, which were not material in 2012.service. If our procedures are not effective, theft of service could significantly increase our expenses and negatively impact our profitability.
We are dependent on a small number of individuals, and if we lose key personnel upon whom we are dependent, our business will be adversely affected.
Many of the key responsibilities of our business have been assigned to a relatively small number of individuals. Our future success depends to a considerable degree on the vision, skills, experience, and effort of our senior management, especially Marc P. Lefar, our Chief Executive Officer.management. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our continued growth depends on our ability to attract and retain experienced key employees.
The success of our business relies on customers’ continued and unimpeded access to broadband service. Providers of broadband services may be
13 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
able to block our services or charge their customers more for also using our services, which could adversely affect our revenue and growth.
Our customers must have broadband access to the Internet in order to use our service. Some providers of broadband access, including outside of the United States, may take measures that affect their customers’ ability to use our service, such as degrading the quality of the data packets we transmit over their lines, giving those packets low priority, giving other packets higher priority than ours, blocking our packets entirely or attempting to charge their customers more for also using our services.
In the United States, there continues to be some uncertainty regarding whether suppliers of broadband Internet access have a legal obligation to allow their customers to access and use our service without
14 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
interference. In December 2010, the FCC adopted new net neutrality rules that would protect services like ours from such interference. Several parties have sought judicial review of the FCC's net neutrality rules. These appeals are currently pending. Interferencerules, and in January 2014 the anti-blocking and unreasonable discrimination provisions of the rules were vacated. While the court ruling did not foreclose the FCC from adopting anti-blocking or non-discrimination rules, interference with our service or higher charges for using our service could cause us to lose existing customers, impair our ability to attract new customers, and harm our revenue and growth. These problems could also arise in international markets. Most foreign countries have not adopted formal net neutrality rules like those adopted by the FCC.
If customers do not accept the differences between our service and traditional telephone service, they may choose to remain with their current telephone service provider or may choose to return to service provided by traditional telephone companies.
For certain users, aspects of our service are not the same as traditional telephone service. Our continued growth is dependent on the adoption of our services by mainstream customers, so these differences are important. For example:
| |
| > | Both our E-911 and emergency calling services are different, in significant respects, from the 911 service associated with traditional wireline and wireless telephone providers and, in certain cases, with other VoIP providers. |
| |
| > | In the event of a power loss or Internet access interruption experienced by a customer, our service is interrupted. Unlike some of our competitors, we have not installed batteries at customer premises to provide emergency power for our customers’ equipment if they lose power, although we do have backup power systems for our network equipment and service platform. |
| |
| > | Our customers may experience lower call quality than they are used to from traditional wireline telephone companies, including static, echoes, and delays in transmissions. |
| |
| > | Our customers may experience higher dropped-call rates than they are used to from traditional wireline telephone companies. |
| |
| > | Customers who obtain new phone numbers from us do not appear in the phone book and their phone numbers are not available through directory assistance services offered by traditional telephone companies. |
| |
| > | Our customers cannot accept collect calls. |
| |
| > | Our customers cannot call premium-rate telephone numbers such as 1-900 numbers and 976 numbers. |
If customers do not accept the differences between our service and traditional telephone service, they may choose to remain with their current telephone service provider or may choose to return to service provided by traditional telephone companies.
Our emergency and E-911 calling services may expose us to significant liability.
The FCC rules for the provision of 911 service by interconnected VoIP providers, such as the VoIP service we provide, require that for all geographic areas covered by the traditional wireline E-911 network, interconnected VoIP providers must provide E-911 service as defined by the FCC’s rules. Under the FCC’s rules, E-911 service means that interconnected VoIP providers must transmit the caller’s telephone number and registered location information to the appropriate PSAP for the caller’s registered location. Vonage provides E-911 service, under the FCC’s rules, to approximately 99.99% of its subscriber lines.
The remaining subscriber lines do not have E-911 service for a variety of reasons including refusal by PSAPs to accept VoIP 911 calls, the inability of PSAPs to receive the registered location data from us, and the failure by third party companies with whom we contract to provide aspects of our E-911 service to obtain the necessary access or complete implementation of the necessary interfaces to the traditional wireline E-911 infrastructure. In addition, certain of our services designed to be highly mobile including soft phone service, which is software that enables a customer to make telephone calls from a computer, route callers to a national emergency call center that in turns routes the call to the appropriate PSAP.
We could be subject to enforcement action by the FCC for our subscriber lines that do not have E-911 service. This enforcement action could result in significant monetary penalties and restrictions on our ability to offer non-compliant services.
Delays our customers may encounter when making emergency services calls and any inability of a PSAP to automatically recognize the caller’s location or telephone number can have devastating consequences. Customers have attempted, and may in the future attempt, to hold us responsible for any loss, damage, personal injury or death suffered as a result. In July 2008, the New and Emerging Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 2008 became law and provided that interconnected VoIP providers have the same protections from liability for the operation of 911 service as traditional wireline and wireless providers. Limitations on liability for the provision of 911 service are normally governed by state law and these limitations typically are not absolute. Thus, for example, we could be subject to liability for a problem with our 911 service where our failures are greater than mere negligence. It is also unclear under the FCC’s rules whether the limitations on liability would apply to those subscriber lines where Vonage does not provide E-911 service.
The debt agreements governing our financing contain restrictions that may limit our flexibility in operating our business.
On February 11, 2013, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to our then existing credit facility (the(as further amended by Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Facility, the "2013 Credit Facility"). The 2013 Credit Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. The 2013 Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants that limit our ability and/or the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants and other restrictions
may under certain circumstances limit, but not necessarily preclude, our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
| |
| > | incur additional indebtedness; |
| |
| > | consummate acquisitions; |
14 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
| |
| > | pay dividends and other distributions. |
Under the 2013 Credit Facility, we are required to comply with the following financial covenants: specified maximum consolidated leverage ratio, specified minimum consolidated fixed coverage charge ratio, minimum cash position and maximum capital expenditures. Our ability to comply with such financial and other covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, so we may not be able to comply with these covenants. A breach of any such covenant could result in a default under the 2013 Credit Facility. In that case, the lenders could elect to declare due and payable immediately all amounts due under the 2013 Credit Facility, including principal and accrued interest.
The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Securities markets experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic conditions, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile. Many factors that are beyond our control may significantly affect the market price of our shares. These factors include:
| |
| > | changes in our earnings or variations in operating results; |
| |
| > | any shortfall in revenue or increase in losses from levels expected by securities analysts; |
| |
| > | judgments in litigation; |
| |
| > | operating performance of companies comparable to us; |
| |
| > | general economic trends and other external factors; and |
| |
| > | market conditions and competitive pressures that prevent us from executing on our future growth initiatives. |
If any of these factors causes the price of our common stock to fall, investors may not be able to sell their common stock at or above their respective purchase prices, or we may face delisting from the New York Stock Exchange.prices.
If we require additional capital, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all.
We may need to pursue additional financing to respond to new competitive pressures, pay extraordinary expenses such as litigation settlements or judgments or fund growth, including through acquisitions. Because of our past significant losses and our limited tangible assets, we do not fit traditional credit lending criteria, which, in particular, could make it difficult for us to obtain loans or to access the capital markets. In addition, the credit documentation for our recent financing contains affirmative and negative covenants that affect, and in many respects may significantly limit or prohibit, among other things,
15 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to incur, refinance or modify indebtedness and create liens.
Our credit card processors have the ability to impose significant holdbacks in certain circumstances. The reinstatement of such holdbacks likely would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
Under our credit card processing agreements with our Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover credit card processors, the credit card processor has the right, in certain circumstances, including adverse events affecting our business, to impose a holdback of our advanced payments purchased using a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover credit card, as applicable, or demand additional reserves or other security. If circumstances were to occur that
would allow any of these processors to reinstate a holdback, the negative impact on our liquidity likely would be significant. In addition, our Visa and MasterCard credit card processing agreement may be terminated by the credit card processor at its discretion if we are deemed to be financially insecure. As a significant portion of payments to us are made through Visa and MasterCard credit cards, if the credit card processor does not assist in transitioning our business to another credit card processor, the negative impact on our liquidity likely would be significant. There were no cash reserves and cash-collateralized letters of credit with any credit card processors as of December 31, 2012.2013.
We have incurred cumulative losses since our inception and may not achieve consistent profitability in the future.
While we achieved net income attributable to Vonage of $36,627$28,289 for the year ended December 31, 20122013, our accumulated deficit is $726,230697,941 from our inception through December 31, 20122013, which included the release of $325,601 of the valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets that we recorded as a one-time non-cash income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2011. Although we believe we will achieve consistent profitability in the future, we ultimately may not be successful. We believe that our ability to achieve consistent profitability will depend, among other factors, on our ability to continue to achieve and maintain substantive operational improvements and structural cost reductions while maintaining and growing our net revenues. In addition, certain of the costs of our business are not within our control and may increase. For example, we and other telecommunications providers are subject to regulatory termination charges imposed by regulatory authorities in countries to which customers make calls, such as India where regulatory authorities have been petitioned by local providers to consider termination rate increases. As we attract additional international long distance callers, we will be more affected by these increases to the extent that we are unable to offset such costs by passing through price increases to customers.
We may be unable to fully realize the benefits of our net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards if an ownership change occurs.
If we were to experience a “change in ownership” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”), the NOL carry forward limitations under Section 382 would impose an annual limit on the amount of the future taxable income that may be offset by our NOL generated prior to the change in ownership. If a change in ownership were to occur, we may be unable to use a significant portion of our NOL to offset future taxable income. In general, a change in ownership occurs when, as of any testing date, there has been a cumulative change in the stock ownership of the corporation held by 5% stockholders of more than 50 percentage points over an applicable three-year period. For these purposes, a 5% stockholder is generally any person or group of persons that at any time during an applicable three-year period has owned 5% or more of our outstanding common stock. In addition, persons who own less than 5% of the outstanding common stock are grouped together as one or more “public group” 5% stockholders. Under Section 382, stock ownership would be determined
under complex attribution rules and generally includes shares held directly, indirectly (though intervening entities), and constructively (by certain related parties and certain unrelated parties acting as a group). We have implemented a Tax Benefits Preservation Plan intended to provide a meaningful deterrent effect against acquisitions that could cause a change in ownership, however this is not a guarantee against such a change in ownership.
Jeffrey A. Citron, our founder, non-executive Chairman, and a significant stockholder, exerts significant influence over us.
As of December 31, 20122013, Mr. Citron beneficially owned approximately 20.6%18.3% of our outstanding common stock, including outstanding securities exercisable for common stock within 60 days of such date. As a result, Mr. Citron is able to exert significant influence over all matters presented to our stockholders for approval, including
15 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
election and removal of our directors and change of control transactions. In addition, as our non-executive Chairman, Mr. Citron has and will continue to have influence over our strategy and other matters as a board member. Mr. Citron’s interests may not always coincide with the interests of other holders of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the agreements governing our indebtedness, and the terms of certain settlement agreements to which we are a party contain provisions that could delay or discourage a takeover attempt, which could prevent the completion of a transaction in which our stockholders could receive a substantial premium over the then-current market price for their shares.
Certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and our second amended and restated bylaws may make it more difficult for, or have the effect of discouraging, a third party from acquiring control of us or changing our board of directors and management. These provisions:
| |
| > | permit our board of directors to issue additional shares of common stock and preferred stock and to establish the number of shares, series designation, voting powers (if any), preferences, other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions of any series of preferred stock; |
| |
| > | limit the ability of stockholders to amend our restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws, including supermajority requirements; |
| |
| > | allow only our board of directors, Chairman of the board of directors or Chief Executive Officer to call special meetings of our stockholders; |
| |
| > | eliminate the ability of stockholders to act by written consent; |
| |
| > | require advance notice for stockholder proposals and director nominations; |
| |
| > | limit the removal of directors and the filling of director vacancies; and |
| |
| > | establish a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms. |
In addition, a change of control would constitute an event of default under our 2013 Credit Facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could elect to declare due and payable immediately all amounts due under our 2013 Credit Facility, including principal and accrued interest, and may take action to foreclose upon the collateral securing the indebtedness.
16 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Under our 2013 Credit Facility, a “change of control” would result from the occurrence of, among other things, the acquisition by any person or group (other than Mr. Citron and his majority-controlled affiliates) of 35% or more of the voting and/or economic interest of our outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis. The definition of “change of control” in the 2013 Credit Facility remains the same as under the credit facility that we entered into in July 2011, a copy of which has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to a Form 8-K filed by us on July 29, 2011.
Further, we were named as a defendant in several suits that related to patent infringement and entered into agreements to settle certain of the suits in 2007. Certain terms of those agreements, including
licenses and covenants not to sue, will be restricted upon a change of control, which may discourage certain potential purchasers from acquiring us.
Such provisions could have the effect of depriving stockholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices. Any delay or prevention of, or significant payments required to be made upon, a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors or management could deter potential acquirors or prevent the completion of a transaction in which our stockholders could receive a substantial premium over the then-current market price for their shares.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. Properties
The following is a summary of our offices and locations:
| | | Location | Business Use | Square Footage |
| | Lease Expiration Date | Business Use | Square Footage |
| | Lease Expiration Date |
| Holmdel, New Jersey | Corporate Headquarters, Network Operations, Customer Service, Sales and Marketing, and Administration | 350,000 |
| | 2017 | Corporate Headquarters, Network Operations, Customer Service, Sales and Marketing, Administration | 350,000 |
| | 2017 |
| London, United Kingdom | Sales and Marketing, Administration | 3,472 |
| | 2015 | Sales and Marketing, Administration | 3,472 |
| | 2015 |
| Atlanta, Georgia | Product Development | 2,588 |
| | 2013 | Sales and Marketing, Administration, and Product Development | 65,824 |
| | 2014 |
| Tel Aviv, Israel | Application Development | 7,158 |
| | 2015 | Application Development | 7,158 |
| | 2015 |
| | | 363,218 |
| | | | 426,454 |
| | |
We believe that the facilities that we occupy are adequate for our current needs and do not anticipate leasing any additional space.
1617 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
Litigation
IP Matters
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. On February 22, 2011, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek”) filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage's products and services are covered by United States Patent No. 7,889,722, entitled “System for Interconnecting Standard Telephony Communications Equipment to Internet Protocol Networks” (the “722 Patent”). The suit also named numerous other defendants, including Verizon Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Time-Warner Cable, Inc., AT&T, Inc., and T-Mobile USA Inc. On August 17, 2011, the Court dismissed Bear Creek's case against the Vonage entities, as well as all the other defendants, except for one defendant. Later, on August 17, 2011, Bear Creek re-filed its complaint concerning the '722 Patent in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the same Vonage entities. In its Delaware complaint, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage is infringing one or more claims of the '722 Patent. In addition, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage is contributing to and inducing infringement of one or more claims of the '722 Patent. On September 28, 2011, Vonage filed a motion to dismiss Bear Creek's claims for induced, contributory, and willful infringement, which was denied on September 27, 2012. On January 25, 2012, Bear Creek filed a motion with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer and consolidate its litigation against Vonage with thirteen separate actions Bear Creek filed in the U.S. District Courts for Delaware and the Eastern District of Virginia. On May 2, 2012, the Multidistrict Litigation Panel granted Bear Creek's motion and ordered the coordination or consolidation for pretrial proceedings of all fourteen actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On October 11, 2012, Vonage filed an answer to Bear Creek's complaint, including counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of the '722 patent. On November 5, 2012, Bear Creek filed an answer to Vonage's counterclaims. On January 22, 2013, the Court set a conference in the case for March 19, 2013, for the purpose of discussing case management including setting a case schedule.
On March 8, 2012, a third-party requested the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") to reexamine the validity of the asserted '722 Patent. The USPTO granted the request on April 26, 2012, and subsequently issued an initial Office Action rejecting all of the '722 Patent claims. After reconsideration based on statements made by the patentee, however, the USPTO on September 19, 2012, reversed its initial rejection, and confirmed all claims as patentable over the references cited in the reexamination request. A second request for reexamination of the '722 Patent was filed on September 12, 2012, by Cisco Systems, Inc., challenging the validity of the '722 Patent. Cisco's request was granted by the USPTO on November 28, 2012. No Office Action in this reexamination has been issued by the USPTO. A third request for reexamination of the '722 Patent was filed on September 14, 2012, and the USPTO denied this request on December 6, 2012.
OpinionLab, Inc. On July 18, 2012, OpinionLab, Inc. (“OpinionLab”) filed a lawsuit against IPerceptions, Inc. and IPerceptions US, Inc. (“IPerceptions”) alleging claims of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and tortious interference with business expectancy. On August 16, 2012, OpinionLab filed an amended complaint, adding Vonage Marketing LLC and Vonage Holdings Corp. as defendants, and alleging that Vonage's products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,421,724, 6,606,581, 6,928,392, 7,085,820, 7,370,285, 8,024,668, and 8,041,805. OpinionLab alleged direct, indirect and willful infringement against Vonage. IPerceptions, the supplier to Vonage of the accused product in this lawsuit, has agreed to fully indemnify and defend Vonage in this lawsuit. On September 11, 2012, IPerceptions and Vonage each moved to dismiss OpinionLab's indirect and willful patent infringement claims. The motions were denied on November 8, 2012. Vonage
answered the complaint on December 7, 2012. The court has scheduled a status hearing for February 19, 2013.
From time to time, in addition to those identified above,below, we are subject to legal proceedings, claims, investigations, and proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third-party patents and other intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. From time to time, we also receive letters or other communications from third parties inviting us to obtain patent licenses that might be relevant to our business or alleging that our services infringe upon third party patents or other intellectual property. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions, if any, are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. We believe that we have valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending against us and are vigorously defending these matters. Given the uncertainty surrounding litigation and our inability to assess the likelihood of a favorable or unfavorable outcome in the above noted matters and our inability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss or range of loss, it is possible that the resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
IP Matters
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. On February 22, 2011, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek���) filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., Vonage Marketing LLC, and Aptela Inc. (a subsidiary of Vocalocity, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company which was acquired on November 15, 2013 pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 9, 2013) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s and Aptela’s products and services are covered by United States Patent No. 7,889,722, entitled “System for Interconnecting Standard Telephony Communications Equipment to Internet Protocol Networks” (the “722 Patent”). The suit also named numerous other defendants, including Verizon Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Time-Warner Cable, Inc., AT&T, Inc., and T-Mobile USA Inc. On August 17, 2011, the Court dismissed Bear Creek’s case against the Vonage entities and Aptela, as well as all the other defendants, except for one defendant. Later, on August 17, 2011, Bear Creek re-filed its complaint concerning the ‘722 Patent in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the same Vonage entities; and also re-filed a separate complaint concerning the ‘722 Patent in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Aptela. In each complaint, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage and Aptela, respectively, are infringing one or more claims of the ‘722 Patent. In addition, Bear Creek alleges that each party is contributing to and inducing infringement of one or more claims of the ‘722 Patent. On January 25, 2012, Bear Creek filed a motion with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer and consolidate its litigations against Vonage and Aptela with twelve other separate actions Bear Creek filed in the U.S. District Courts for Delaware and the Eastern District of Virginia. On May 2, 2012, the Multidistrict Litigation Panel granted Bear Creek’s motion and ordered the coordination or consolidation for pretrial proceedings of all fourteen actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On October 11, 2012, Vonage filed an answer to Bear Creek’s complaint, including counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘722 patent. Aptela, which filed a motion to dismiss Bear Creek’s complaint on September 27, 2011, has not yet answered, as its motion remains pending and awaiting disposition by the court. On November 5, 2012,
Bear Creek filed an answer to Vonage’s counterclaims. On March 1, 2013, several defendants including Vonage moved the Court to stay the case pending resolution of the reexamination of the ‘722 patent requested by Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) as described below; the motion was granted on July 17, 2013, and the case is now stayed pending the resolution of the reexamination. On November 8, 2013, the Court granted Bear Creek’s request to terminate and substitute counsel representing it in the litigation.
On March 8, 2012, a third-party requested the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) to reexamine the validity of the asserted ‘722 Patent. The USPTO granted the request on April 26, 2012, and subsequently issued an initial Office Action rejecting all of the ‘722 Patent claims. After reconsideration based on statements made by the patentee, the USPTO on September 19, 2012, reversed its initial rejection, and confirmed all claims as patentable over the references cited in the reexamination request. A second request for reexamination of the ‘722 Patent was filed on September 12, 2012, by Cisco, challenging the validity of the ‘722 Patent. Cisco’s request was granted by the USPTO on November 28, 2012. On March 26, 2013, the USPTO issued an Office Action rejecting all claims of the ‘722 patent as invalid. Bear Creek responded to the Office Action on May 28, 2013, requesting withdrawal of the USPTO’s rejection. Cisco responded to Bear Creek’s submission on June 26, 2013. A third request for reexamination of the ‘722 Patent was filed on September 14, 2012, and the USPTO denied this request on December 6, 2012.
OpinionLab, Inc. On July 18, 2012, OpinionLab, Inc. (“OpinionLab”) filed a lawsuit against IPerceptions, Inc. and IPerceptions US, Inc. (collectively, “IPerceptions”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) alleging claims of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and tortious interference with business expectancy. On August 16, 2012, OpinionLab filed an amended complaint, adding Vonage Marketing LLC and Vonage Holdings Corp. as defendants, and alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,421,724, 6,606,581, 6,928,392, 7,085,820, 7,370,285, 8,024,668, and 8,041,805. OpinionLab alleged direct, indirect and willful infringement by Vonage. IPerceptions, the supplier to Vonage of the accused product in this lawsuit, has agreed to fully defend and indemnify Vonage in this lawsuit. On September 11, 2012, IPerceptions and Vonage each moved to dismiss OpinionLab’s indirect and willful patent infringement claims. The motions were denied on November 8, 2012. Vonage answered the complaint on December 7, 2012. On July 11, 2013, the Court issued an order setting the case schedule. On September 6, 2013, OpinionLab filed a second amended complaint, which was answered by defendants on September 23, 2013. On October 14, 2013, OpinionLab made an unopposed motion to consolidate the case for pre-trial purposes with Case No. 13-CV-1574, OpinionLab, Inc. v Qualtrics Labs, Inc., currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The motion was granted October 17, 2013.
RPost Holdings, Inc. On August 24, 2012, RPost Holdings, Inc., RPost Communications Limited, and RMail Limited (collectively, “RPost”) filed a lawsuit against StrongMail Systems, Inc. (“StrongMail”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) alleging that StrongMail’s products and services, including its electronic mail marketing services, are covered by United States Patent Nos. 8,224,913, 8,209,389, 8,161,104, 7,966,372, and 6,182,219. On January 16, 2013, StrongMail moved the Court to transfer the venue of the lawsuit to the Northern District of California. That motion was denied by the Court on August 19, 2013. On February 11, 2013, RPost filed an amended complaint, adding 27 new defendants, including Vonage America Inc. RPost’s amended complaint alleges willful infringement of the RPost patents by Vonage and each of the other new defendants because they are customers of StrongMail. StrongMail has agreed to fully defend and indemnify Vonage in this lawsuit. Vonage answered the complaint on May 7, 2013. On January 30, 2014, RPost
18 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
informed the Court that it is ready for a scheduling conference; the Court has not yet scheduled a conference.
Straight Path IP Group Inc. On November 4, 2013, Straight Path IP Group Inc. (“Straight Path”), a subsidiary of Straight Path Communications Inc., filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,009,469, 6,131,121, 6,513,066, and 6,701,365. Straight Path alleged direct and indirect infringement by Vonage. On December 20, 2013, Vonage moved to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey and that motion was granted by the court on January 17, 2014. On December 30, 2013, Vonage answered the complaint and filed a motion to dismiss Straight Path’s claims for induced and contributory infringement. In response, Straight Path amended its complaint on January 7, 2014. On February 7, 2014, Vonage answered the amended complaint and moved to dismiss Straight Path's claims for indirect infringement.
Previously, on August 2, 2013, Straight Path filed a lawsuit against Vocalocity, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) alleging that Vocalocity’s products and services are covered by the ‘066 and ‘365 patents. Straight Path alleged direct and indirect infringement by Vocalocity. On September 11, 2013, the lawsuit was ordered consolidated with two other lawsuits by Straight Path filed in early August 2013 against Bandwidth.com, Inc. and Telesphere Networks Ltd., relating to the same patents. On October 15, 2013, Vocalocity moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On October 18, 2013, Straight Path filed an amended complaint. Vocalocity answered the amended complaint on November 4, 2013, and asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity against both patents. Straight Path answered the counterclaims on November 20, 2013. The parties submitted opening and response claim construction briefs on December 13, 2013 and December 20, 2013, respectively. A Markman hearing was held on January 16, 2014. The parties await the Court's claim construction order.On November 13, 2013, the Court approved the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan under which discovery shall conclude on February 14, 2014, and a final pretrial conference shall be held on February 20, 2014.
AIP Acquisition LLC. On January 3, 2014, AIP Acquisition LLC (“AIP”), filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent No. 7,269,247. Vonage's answer is due February 26, 2014.
Commercial Litigation
Merkin & Smith, et als. On September 27, 2013, Arthur Merkin and James Smith filed a putative class action lawsuit against Vonage America, Inc. in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, alleging that Vonage violated California’s Unfair Competition Law by charging its customers fictitious 911 taxes and fees. On October 30, 2013, Vonage filed a notice removing the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On October 30, 2013 the case was assigned to a United States District Judge and a Magistrate Judge, with the parties directed to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program. On November 26, 2013, Vonage filed its Answer to the Complaint. On December 4, 2013, Vonage filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration. A hearing was held on January 27, 2014, and on February 4, 2014, the Court denied Vonage’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. Vonage has 30 days to file a notice of appeal of the Court’s decision, if it decides to do so.
Regulation
Telephony services are subject to a broad spectrum of state and federal regulations. Because of the uncertainty over whether Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) should be treated as a
telecommunications or information service, we have been involved in a substantial amount of state and federal regulatory activity. Implementation and interpretation of the existing laws and regulations is ongoing and is subject to litigation by various federal and state agencies and courts. Due to the uncertainty over the regulatory classification of VoIP service, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to new regulations or existing regulations under new interpretations, and that such change would not introduce material additional costs to our business.
Federal - CALEA
On August 5, 2005, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) released an Order extending the obligations of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) to interconnected VoIP providers. Under CALEA, telecommunications carriers must assist law enforcement in executing electronic surveillance, which includes the capability to provide call content and call-identifying information to a local enforcement agency, or LEA, pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization.
The FCC required all interconnected VoIP providers to become fully CALEA compliant by May 14, 2007. Vonage has tested with a federal law enforcement agency and implemented a trusted third party CALEA solution to meet this requirement. We could be subject to an enforcement action in the future in the event the government took the position that we were not in compliance with CALEA.
Federal - Local Number Portability
On May 13, 2009, the FCC adopted an order that reduced to one business day the amount of time that an interconnected VoIP provider such as us have to port a telephone number to another provider. If we, or third parties we rely upon for porting, have difficulty executing the one-day porting requirement, we could be subject to FCC enforcement action.
17 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
Federal - Net Neutrality
Clear and enforceable net neutrality rules would make it more difficult for broadband Internet service providers to block or discriminate against Vonage service. Also explicitly applying net neutrality rules to wireless broadband Internet service could create greater opportunities for VoIP applications that run on wireless broadband Internet service. In October 2009, the FCC proposed the adoption of enforceable net neutrality rules for both wired and wireless broadband Internet service providers. The proposed rules would prohibit wired and wireless broadband Internet service providers from blocking or hindering lawful content, applications, or services and from unreasonably discriminating when transmitting lawful network traffic. In addition, broadband Internet service providers would have to publicly disclose certain information about their network management practices. In December 2010, the FCC adopted enforceable net neutrality rules based on its October 2009 proposal. All of the proposed rules in the October 2009 proposal applied to wired broadband Internet providers. The FCC applied some but not all of the proposed rules to wireless broadband service. Wireless broadband Internet services providers are prohibited from blocking or hindering voice or video applications that compete with the broadband Internet service provider's voice or video services. Wireless providers are also subject to transparency requirements, but they are not subject to the prohibition on unreasonable discrimination that applies to wired broadband Internet services providers. Final rules were filed in the Federal Register in September 2011. Shortly thereafter, a number of parties filed appeals of the rules in various federal circuit courts; some alleging that the FCC lacks authority to apply net neutrality rules to broadband service providers and some alleging that the rules did not go far enough. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals was selected by lottery to decide the appeals and the appeals alleging that the rules did not go far enough were dropped. The appeals alleging thatD.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on the appeal on September 9, 2013. On January 14, 2014, the D.C. Circuit vacated the anti-blocking and the unreasonable discrimination provisions of the rules. The D.C. Circuit decision did not foreclose the FCC lacks authority to applyfrom adopting anti-blocking or non-discrimination rules and the rules are pending.FCC may revisit these issues or appeal the ruling.
Federal - Intercarrier Compensation
On February 9, 2011, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on reforming universal service and the intercarrier compensation (“ICC”) system that governs payments between telecommunications carriers primarily for terminating traffic. In particular, the FCC indicated that it has never determined the ICC obligations for VoIP service and sought comment on a number of proposals for how VoIP should be treated in the ICC system. The FCC's adoption of an ICC proposal will impact Vonage's costs for telecommunications services. On October 27, 2011, the FCC adopted an order reforming universal service and ICC. The FCC order provides that VoIP originated calls will be subject to interstate access charges for long distance calls and reciprocal compensation for local calls that terminate to the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”). It also subjected PSTN originated traffic directed to VoIP subscribers to similar ICC obligations. The termination charges for all traffic, including VoIP originated traffic, will transition over several years to a bill and keep arrangement (i.e., no termination charges). Numerous parties filed appeals of the FCC order in multiple federal circuit courts of appeal. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals was selected by lottery to decide the appeals. The appeals are pending.
19 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Federal - Universal Service Contribution Reform
On April 30, 2012, the FCC released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on reforming federal universal service fund (“USF”) contributions. Currently USF contributions are assessed on the interstate and international revenue of traditional telephone carriers and interconnected VoIP providers like Vonage. The level of USF assessments on these providers has been going up over time because of decreases in the revenue subject to assessment due to substitution of non-assessable services such as non-interconnected VoIP services. If the FCC does reform USF contributions, it is likely that Vonage's contribution burden will decline.
Federal - Rural Call Completion Issues
On February 7, 2013, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on rural call completion issues. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposed new detailed reporting requirements to gauge rural call completion performance. Rural carriers have argued that VoIP provider call completion performance to rural areas is generally poor. On October 28, 2013, the FCC adopted an order on rural call completion that imposes new reporting obligations and restricts certain call signaling practices. The call signaling rules went into effect on January 31, 2014. On January 17, 2014, we filed for an extension from January 31, 2014 to March 3, 2014 to implement the call signaling rules. On January 30, 2014, the FCC granted our requested extension. We could be subject to an FCC enforcement action in the future in the event the FCC took the position that our rural call completion performance is inadequate or we were not compliant with the FCC’s order.
Federal - Numbering Rights
On April 18, 2013, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposing to modify FCC rules to allow VoIP providers to directly access telephone numbers. In addition, the FCC granted a waiver from its existing rules to allow Vonage to conduct a trial of direct access to telephone numbers. The trial would allow the FCC to obtain real-world data on direct access to telephone numbers by VoIP providers to inform consideration of the NPRM. Direct access to telephone numbers would facilitate IP to IP interconnection, which may allow VoIP providers to provide higher quality, lower cost services, promote the deployment of innovative new voice services, and experience reductions in the cost of telephony services. Vonage successfully completed the trial in certain markets and filed the required reports on the trial with the FCC. On January 31, 2014, the FCC Wireline Competition Bureau issued a positive report on the trial, concluding that Vonage's successful trial confirmed the technical feasibility of interconnected VoIP providers obtaining telephone numbers directly from the numbering administrators. The NPRM provides for a 30-day comment period on this report. Given the positive report, at the end of this comment period, the FCC may adopt its proposed rule to allow VoIP providers to directly access telephone numbers.
Pakistan Termination Rate Increase
On October 1, 2012, Pakistani carriers formed the International Clearing House (ICH). This cartel subsequently took action to increase the cost to terminate international calls to Pakistan by approximately 500 percent . As a result of the implementation of higher termination costs, Vonage was forced to remove Pakistan from unlimited calling in its Vonage World plan. Vonage filed a petition at the FCC, shortly after the ICH rates became effective, seeking an order prohibiting U.S. carriers from paying the new higher ICH rates. On March 5, 2013, the FCC issued an order that prohibits U.S. carriers from paying more than the prevailing termination rate prior to the implementation of the ICH rates. In addition to the Vonage challenge in the U.S., a Pakistani carrier challenged the ICH action under Pakistani competition law. After the trial court found that the ICH violated Pakistani competition law, the Supreme Court of Pakistan overturned the trial court decision and remanded the case to the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP). On April 30, 2013, the CCP issued an order that holds that the ICH violates Pakistani competition law. On May 9, 2013, the Sindh High Court temporarily suspended the CCP order while the court considers constitutional challenges to the order made by several Pakistani carriers. Despite favorable action by both U.S. and Pakistani authorities,
it is currently unclear if or how long it will take for international termination rates in Pakistan to return to a more competitive level.
State Telecommunications Regulation
In general, the focus of interconnected VoIP telecommunications regulation is at the federal level. On November 12,
2004, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling providing that our service is subject to federal regulation and preempted the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission from imposing certain of its regulations on us. The FCC's decision was based on its conclusion that our service is interstate in nature and cannot be separated into interstate and intrastate components. On March 21, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit affirmed the FCC's declaratory ruling preempting state regulation of our service. The 8th Circuit found that it is impossible for us to separate our interstate traffic from our intrastate traffic because of the nomadic nature of the service. As a result, the 8th Circuit held that it was reasonable for the FCC to preempt state regulation of our service. The 8th Circuit was clear, however, that the preemptive effect of the FCC's declaratory ruling may be reexamined if technological advances allow for the separation of interstate and intrastate components of the nomadic VoIP service. Therefore, the preemption of state authority over our service under this ruling generally hinges on the inability to separate the interstate and intrastate components of the service.
While this ruling does not exempt us from all state oversight of our service, it effectively prevents state telecommunications regulators from imposing certain burdensome and inconsistent market entry requirements and certain other state utility rules and regulations on our service. State regulators continue to probe the limits of federal preemption in their attempts to apply state telecommunications regulation to interconnected VoIP service. On July 16, 2009, the Nebraska Public Service Commission and the Kansas Corporation Commission filed a petition with the FCC seeking a declaratory ruling or, alternatively, adoption of a rule declaring that state authorities may apply universal service funding requirements to nomadic VoIP providers. We participated in the FCC proceedings on the petition. On November 5, 2010, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling that allowed states to assess state USF on nomadic VoIP providers on a going forward basis provided that the states comply with certain conditions to ensure that imposing state USF does not conflict with federal law or policy. We expect that state public utility commissions and state legislators will continue their attempts to apply state telecommunications regulations to nomadic VoIP service.
State and Municipal Taxes
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we make a provision for a liability for taxes when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability or range of liability can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. For a period of time, we did not collect or remit state or municipal taxes (such as sales, excise, utility, use, and ad valorem taxes), fees or surcharges (“Taxes”) on the charges to our customers for our services, except that we historically complied with the New Jersey sales tax. We have received inquiries or demands from a number of state and municipal taxing and 911 agencies seeking payment of Taxes that are applied to or collected from customers of providers of traditional public switched telephone network services. Although we have consistently maintained that these Taxes do not apply to our service for a variety of reasons depending on the statute or rule that establishes such obligations, we are now collecting and remitting sales taxes in certain of those states including a number of states that have changed their statutes to expressly include VoIP. In addition, many states address how VoIP providers should contribute to support public safety agencies, and in those states we remit fees to the appropriate state agencies. We could also be contacted by state or municipal taxing and 911 agencies regarding Taxes that do explicitly apply to VoIP and these agencies could seek retroactive payment of Taxes. As such, we have a reserve of $1,5144,630 as of December 31, 20122013 as our best estimate of the potential tax exposure for any retroactive assessment. We believe
20 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
the maximum estimated exposure for retroactive assessments is approximately $4,0007,000 as of December 31, 20122013.
18 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
1921 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “VG” since May 24, 2006. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The
following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for the quarterly periods indicated.
| | | Price Range of Common Stock | | Price Range of Common Stock | |
| High | | Low | High | | Low |
| 2013 | | | | |
| Fourth quarter | | $ | 3.93 |
| | $ | 3.02 |
|
| Third quarter | | $ | 3.46 |
| | $ | 2.73 |
|
| Second quarter | | $ | 3.15 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
|
| First quarter | | $ | 2.92 |
| | $ | 2.30 |
|
| 2012 | | | | | | |
| Fourth quarter | $ | 2.50 |
| | $ | 2.12 |
| $ | 2.50 |
| | $ | 2.12 |
|
| Third quarter | $ | 2.55 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
| $ | 2.55 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
|
| Second quarter | $ | 2.27 |
| | $ | 1.64 |
| $ | 2.27 |
| | $ | 1.64 |
|
| First quarter | $ | 3.16 |
| | $ | 2.14 |
| $ | 3.16 |
| | $ | 2.14 |
|
| 2011 | | | | |
| Fourth quarter | $ | 3.52 |
| | $ | 2.04 |
| |
| Third quarter | $ | 4.82 |
| | $ | 2.51 |
| |
| Second quarter | $ | 5.39 |
| | $ | 3.99 |
| |
| First quarter | $ | 4.94 |
| | $ | 2.25 |
| |
Holders
At January 31, 2013,2014, we had approximately 148181 stockholders of record. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held in street name.
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for at least the next 12 months. We intend to retain all of our earnings, if any, for general corporate purposes, and, if appropriate, to finance the expansion of our business.
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of
our common stock between December 31, 20072008 and December 31, 20122013, with the cumulative total return of (1) the S&P 500 Index, (2) the NASDAQ Telecom Index and (3) the NYSE Composite Index. This graph assumes the investment of $100 on December 31, 20072008 in our common stock, the S&P 500 Index, the NASDAQ Telecom Index and the NYSE Composite Index, and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any.
The graph below and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate such information by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
2022 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
COMPARISON OF THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN ON COMMON STOCK BETWEEN DECEMBER 31, 20072008 AND DECEMBER 31, 20122013 |
Among Vonage Holdings Corp., the S&P 500 Index, the NASDAQ Telecom Index and the NYSE Composite Index.
| | | December 31, | | December 31, | |
| 2008 |
| | 2009 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2012 |
| 2009 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2013 |
|
| Vonage Holdings Corp. | $ | 28.70 |
| | $ | 60.87 |
| | $ | 97.39 |
| | $ | 106.52 |
| | $ | 103.04 |
| $ | 212.12 |
| | $ | 339.39 |
| | $ | 371.21 |
| | $ | 359.09 |
| | $ | 504.55 |
|
| S&P 500 Index | $ | 61.51 |
| | $ | 75.94 |
| | $ | 85.65 |
| | $ | 85.65 |
| | $ | 97.13 |
| $ | 123.45 |
| | $ | 139.23 |
| | $ | 139.23 |
| | $ | 157.90 |
| | $ | 204.63 |
|
| NASDAQ Telecom Index | $ | 57.02 |
| | $ | 87.25 |
| | $ | 87.84 |
| | $ | 76.75 |
| | $ | 78.29 |
| $ | 153.02 |
| | $ | 154.06 |
| | $ | 134.62 |
| | $ | 137.31 |
| | $ | 170.29 |
|
| NYSE Composite Index | $ | 59.11 |
| | $ | 76.21 |
| | $ | 81.76 |
| | $ | 76.76 |
| | $ | 86.69 |
| $ | 128.94 |
| | $ | 138.34 |
| | $ | 129.88 |
| | $ | 146.66 |
| | $ | 180.65 |
|
Common Stock repurchases
See Note 8 – Common Stock of the Notes to Financial Statements (Part IV of this Form 10-K) for information regarding common stock repurchases by quarter. Following are our monthly
common stock repurchases (in thousands, except per share value) during the fourth quarter of 20122013, all of which were purchased as part of publicly announced repurchase programs:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plans or Program |
| October 1, 2012 - October 31, 2012 (1) | 2,237 |
| | 2.24 |
| | 2,237 |
| | $ | 35,932 |
|
| November 1, 2012 - November 30, 2012 (2) | 2,721 |
| | 2.26 |
| | 2,721 |
| | $ | 29,787 |
|
| December 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012 (3) | 3,199 |
| | 2.42 |
| | 3,199 |
| | $ | 22,056 |
|
| | 8,157 |
| | | | 8,157 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plans or Program |
| October 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013 (1) | 1,159 |
| | 3.37 |
| | 1,159 |
| | $ | 56,953 |
|
| November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2013 (2) | 853 |
| | 3.33 |
| | 853 |
| | $ | 54,111 |
|
| December 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013 (3) | 1,456 |
| | 3.27 |
| | 1,456 |
| | $ | 49,347 |
|
| | 3,468 |
| | | | 3,468 |
| | |
(1) including 10050 shares, or $229185, of common stock repurchases settled in November 2012;2013; excluding commission of $441.
(2) including 300240 shares, or $709793, of common stock repurchases settled in December 2012;2013; excluding commission of $542.
(3) including 278220 shares, or $638734, of common stock repurchases settled in January 2013;2014; excluding commission of $652.
On February 7, 2013, Vonage's Board of Directors discontinued the remainder of the $50,000 repurchase program, announced on July 25, 2012, effective at the close of business on February 12, 2013, with $16,682 remaining, and authorized a new program to repurchase up to $100,000 of the Company's outstanding shares. The $100,000 repurchase program expires on December 31, 2014 but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. The specific timing and amount of repurchases will vary based on available capital
resources and other financial and operational performance, market conditions, securities law limitations, and other factors. The repurchases will be made using our cash resources. In any period, cash used in financing activities related to common stock repurchases may differ from the comparable change in stockholders' equity, reflecting timing differences between the recognition of share repurchase transactions and their settlement for cash.
23 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
During the three months ended December 31, 20122013, we repurchased 8,1573,468 shares of Vonage Holdings Corp. common stock for $18,889$11,514 exclude commission using cash resources.resources pursuant to the $100,000 repurchase program. The repurchases occurred in the open
market and pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31, 2012,2013, approximately $22,056$49,347 remained of our $50,000$100,000 repurchase program that we announced on July 25, 2012. The program was to expire on
program.December 31, 2013, subject to suspension or discontinuance at any time without notice. On February 7, 2013, Vonage's Board of Directors discontinued this share repurchase program effective at the close of business on February 12, 2013 with $16,682 remaining, and authorized a new program to repurchase up to $100,000 of the Company's outstanding shares by December 31, 2014.
2124 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected historical financial information. The statement of operations and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of operations and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and the balance sheet data as of
December 31, 20102011, 20092010 and 20082009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results included below and elsewhere are not necessarily indicative of our future performance. You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2009 |
| | 2008 |
| 2013 (1) |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2009 |
|
| Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | 885,042 |
| | $ | 889,080 |
| | $ | 900,120 |
| $ | 829,067 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | 885,042 |
| | $ | 889,080 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct cost of telephony services (1)(2) | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
| | 243,794 |
| | 213,553 |
| | 226,210 |
| 213,712 |
| | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
| | 243,794 |
| | 213,553 |
|
| Direct cost of goods sold | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
| | 55,965 |
| | 71,488 |
| | 79,382 |
| 37,586 |
| | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
| | 55,965 |
| | 71,488 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 242,368 |
| | 234,754 |
| | 238,986 |
| | 265,456 |
| | 298,985 |
| 262,302 |
| | 242,368 |
| | 234,754 |
| | 238,986 |
| | 265,456 |
|
| Marketing | 212,540 |
| | 204,263 |
| | 198,170 |
| | 227,990 |
| | 253,370 |
| 227,052 |
| | 212,540 |
| | 204,263 |
| | 198,170 |
| | 227,990 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 33,324 |
| | 37,051 |
| | 53,073 |
| | 53,391 |
| | 48,612 |
| 36,066 |
| | 33,324 |
| | 37,051 |
| | 53,073 |
| | 53,391 |
|
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | 784,504 |
| | 753,973 |
| | 789,988 |
| | 831,878 |
| | 906,559 |
| 776,718 |
| | 784,504 |
| | 753,973 |
| | 789,988 |
| | 831,878 |
|
| Income (loss) from operations | 64,610 |
| | 116,350 |
| | 95,054 |
| | 57,202 |
| | (6,439 | ) | |
| Income from operations | | 52,349 |
| | 64,610 |
| | 116,350 |
| | 95,054 |
| | 57,202 |
|
| Other Income (Expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | 109 |
| | 135 |
| | 519 |
| | 277 |
| | 3,236 |
| 307 |
| | 109 |
| | 135 |
| | 519 |
| | 277 |
|
| Interest expense | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) | | (48,541 | ) | | (54,192 | ) | | (29,878 | ) | (6,557 | ) | | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) | | (48,541 | ) | | (54,192 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant | — |
| | (950 | ) | | (99,338 | ) | | (49,933 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | (950 | ) | | (99,338 | ) | | (49,933 | ) |
| Loss (gain) on extinguishment of notes | — |
| | (11,806 | ) | | (31,023 | ) | | 4,041 |
| | (30,570 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (11,806 | ) | | (31,023 | ) | | 4,041 |
|
| Other (expense) income, net | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (18 | ) | | 843 |
| | (247 | ) | (104 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (18 | ) | | 843 |
|
| | (5,888 | ) | | (30,010 | ) | | (178,401 | ) | | (98,964 | ) | | (57,459 | ) | (6,354 | ) | | (5,888 | ) | | (30,010 | ) | | (178,401 | ) | | (98,964 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit | 58,722 |
| | 86,340 |
| | (83,347 | ) | | (41,762 | ) | | (63,898 | ) | 45,995 |
| | 58,722 |
| | 86,340 |
| | (83,347 | ) | | (41,762 | ) |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (22,095 | ) | | 322,704 |
| | (318 | ) | | (836 | ) | | (678 | ) | (18,194 | ) | | (22,095 | ) | | 322,704 |
| | (318 | ) | | (836 | ) |
| Net Income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | | $ | (42,598 | ) | | $ | (64,576 | ) | $ | 27,801 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | | $ | (42,598 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plus: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | $ | 488 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to Vonage | | $ | 28,289 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | | $ | (42,598 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Vonage per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| Diluted | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
| | 209,868 |
| | 170,314 |
| | 156,258 |
| 211,563 |
| | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
| | 209,868 |
| | 170,314 |
|
| Diluted | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
| | 209,868 |
| | 170,314 |
| | 156,258 |
| 220,520 |
| | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
| | 209,868 |
| | 170,314 |
|
2225 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
| | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (dollars in thousands) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2009 |
| | 2008 |
| 2013 (1) |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2009 |
|
| Statement of Cash Flow Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 119,843 |
| | $ | 146,786 |
| | $ | 194,212 |
| | $ | 38,396 |
| | $ | 3,555 |
| $ | 88,243 |
| | $ | 119,843 |
| | $ | 146,786 |
| | $ | 194,212 |
| | $ | 38,396 |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) | | (4,686 | ) | | (50,565 | ) | | 40,486 |
| |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) | | (143,762 | ) | | (3,253 | ) | | (68,370 | ) | |
| Balance Sheet Data (at period end): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (120,985 | ) | | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) | | (4,686 | ) | | (50,565 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 21,891 |
| | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) | | (143,762 | ) | | (3,253 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| (dollars in thousands) | | 2013 (1) |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2009 |
|
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 97,110 |
| | $ | 58,863 |
| | $ | 78,934 |
| | $ | 32,213 |
| | $ | 46,134 |
| $ | 84,663 |
| | $ | 97,110 |
| | $ | 58,863 |
| | $ | 78,934 |
| | $ | 32,213 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 60,533 |
| | 67,978 |
| | 79,050 |
| | 90,548 |
| | 98,292 |
| 52,243 |
| | 60,533 |
| | 67,978 |
| | 79,050 |
| | 90,548 |
|
| Goodwill and intangible assets, net | | 160,477 |
| | 6,681 |
| | 9,056 |
| | 4,186 |
| | 5,331 |
|
| Total deferred tax assets, including current portion, net | 306,113 |
| | 325,601 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 264,900 |
| | 306,113 |
| | 325,601 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Restricted cash | 5,656 |
| | 6,929 |
| | 7,978 |
| | 43,700 |
| | 39,585 |
| 4,405 |
| | 5,656 |
| | 6,929 |
| | 7,978 |
| | 43,700 |
|
| Total assets | 547,389 |
| | 566,215 |
| | 260,392 |
| | 313,384 |
| | 336,905 |
| 642,749 |
| | 547,389 |
| | 566,215 |
| | 260,392 |
| | 313,384 |
|
| Total notes payable, including current portion, net of discount | 42,500 |
| | 70,833 |
| | 193,004 |
| | 201,771 |
| | 194,050 |
| |
| Total notes payable and indebtedness under revolving credit facility, including current portion | | 121,666 |
| | 42,500 |
| | 70,833 |
| | 193,004 |
| | 201,771 |
|
| Capital lease obligations | 15,561 |
| | 17,665 |
| | 19,448 |
| | 20,948 |
| | 22,199 |
| 13,090 |
| | 15,561 |
| | 17,665 |
| | 19,448 |
| | 20,948 |
|
| Total liabilities | 225,974 |
| | 266,648 |
| | 390,039 |
| | 405,293 |
| | 427,647 |
| 304,713 |
| | 225,974 |
| | 266,648 |
| | 390,039 |
| | 405,293 |
|
| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | 321,415 |
| | 299,567 |
| | (129,647 | ) | | (91,909 | ) | | (90,742 | ) | 338,074 |
| | 321,415 |
| | 290,567 |
| | (129,647 | ) | | (91,909 | ) |
| |
(1) |
(1) The year ended December 31, 2013 includes the impact of the acquisition of Vocalocity Inc., which was completed in the fourth quarter.
(2) Excludes depreciation and amortization of$14,892 for 2013, $15,115 for 2012, $15,824 for 2011, $18,725 for 2010, and $18,958 for 2009, and $20,254 for 2008. |
2326 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion together with “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of many factors, including the factors we describe under “Item 1A—Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We are a leading provider of communications services connecting people through cloud-connected devices worldwide. We rely heavily on our network, which is a flexible, scalable Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) based Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, network. This platform enables a user via a single “identity,” either a number or user name, to access and utilize services and features regardless of how they are connected to the Internet, including over 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, Cable, or DSL broadband networks. This technology enables us to offer our customers attractively priceddelivery of voice, messaging and messagingvideo services and other features around the worldglobally on a variety of devices.
OverSince its inception, Vonage has used IP technology to disrupt large existing markets by offering high-value, low cost communications services. From its start-up roots, the past five years, we have fundamentally transformedCompany has evolved into a leader in the VoIP services market, with 2.5 million customer lines serving residential and small and medium business customers. Customers using our company - strategically, operationallycore Vonage landline replacement service are located in the United States (94% of lines), Canada and financially. the UK. Our mobile applications serve customers around the world.
Key to the Company's evolution was its strategic, operational and financial transformation, which was largely completed in 2012. This transformation resulted in a dramatic swing to profitability enabled by significant cost reductions, a meaningful lowering of customer defections, and the successful restructuring our balance sheet. This transformation positioned the Company to pursue our current growth strategy.
Strategically, we shifted our primary focus in our domestic markets to serving the rapidly growing but under-served ethnic segments in the United States with international calling needs. We improved ourthe customer value proposition by being the first to deliver flat-rate, unlimited calling to over 60 countries with the launch of our Vonage World service, and we were the first to provide easy-to-use,differentiated our service by providing enhanced features, like voice-to-text translation andincluding our mobile Extension services,Extensions service, at no extra cost. These strategic shifts have resulted in new customers with a higher average lifetime value and a better churn profile than those in the past.
Our focus on operations during this period has resulted in a significantly improved cost structure. We have implemented operational efficiencies throughout our business and have reduced domestic and international termination costs per minute, andOperationally, we lowered customer care costs. Importantly, we have enabled structural cost reductions while significantly improving network call quality and customer service performance. Improvements in the overall customer experience have contributed to lower churn which declined from highs of 3.6% in July 2009 to 2.6% in 2012; we further lowered churn in 2013 to 2.5% at the end of the 2012.
. Through three debt refinancings in December 2010, and July 2011, and February 2013, we have fundamentally improvedlowered our balance sheet, reducing annual interest expenserate from $49 million in 2010 to $6 million in 2012 and reducing interest rates from as high as 20% in 2009 to less than 4% today., saving over $40 million in annual interest expense.
In part as a result ofOur disciplined approach to cash management was fundamental in enabling us to establish our operational and financial stability, on February 7, 2013, Vonage's Board of Directors discontinued the remainder of our existing share repurchase program effective at the closewhich was first instituted in August of business on February 12, 2013 with $16,682 remaining, and authorized2012. We currently have a new program$100,000 repurchase authorization in place to repurchase up to $100,000 of the Company's outstanding sharesbe completed by December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, we have repurchased $50,653 or 16,954 shares of Vonage common stock. Since beginning the first repurchase program, we have repurchased $83,971 or 31,390 shares of Vonage stock.
We believe our repurchase program reflects our balanced approach to capital allocation as we invest for growth, both organically
and inorganically through our growth initiativesacquisitions, and deliver value to shareholders without compromising our ongoing operational needs.
Having achieved operationalIn 2013 we made important progress against each of our growth priorities. We launched the BasicTalk brand nationally, offering compelling value to domestic callers. In the core Vonage branded business, we continued to allocate marketing investments from mass-reach vehicles like television to more ethnically-targeted and financial stability, we are focused on driving revenue through three major growth initiatives. The first growth initiative iscost-efficient, in-person selling channels. These initiatives combined to offset the existing weakening in our core North American markets, wherepremium domestic service, which reflects broad market trends. As a result, for 2013, we will continuedelivered positive net line additions for the first time since 2008. We grew the penetration rate of our mobile Extension service, which extends our home phone product to provide extraordinary valuemobile phones, and we improved our standalone mobile app with quality and feature enhancements, including video calling and video voicemail. Early in international long distance calling, while targeting under-served ethnic segments,2013 we announced a joint venture to launch service in Brazil and we expect to
enter the low-end domesticthis market with a secondary brand. Our second growth initiative is international expansion outside of North America through strategic partnerships. Our third growth initiative is mobile services which we view as a strategic enabler of the Company's entire product offering over time.
We had approximately 2.4 million subscriber lines for broadband telephone replacement services as of December 31, 2012. We bill customersphased launch in the United States, Canada,second quarter of 2014. In late 2013 we acquired Vocalocity, a leading provider of hosted VoIP services to small and the United Kingdom. Customers in the United States represented 93% of our subscriber lines at December 31, 2012.
medium businesses.
Recent Developments
Amended Credit AgreementAcquisition of Vocalocity.. On February 11, 2013, we entered into an amendment Pursuant to the credit facility that we enteredAgreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated October 9, 2013, by and among Vocalocity Inc. ("Vocalocity"), Vista Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage (“Merger Sub”), Vonage and Shareholder Representative Services, LLC (acting solely in its capacity as the Representative, the “Representative”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on November 15, 2013, Merger Sub merged with and into Vocalocity, and Vocalocity became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage (the “ Merger ”).
Vocalocity was acquired for $130,000 adjusted for $2,869 of excess cash as of the closing date and the increase in July 2011 (the “2011 Credit Facility”). The amendment (the “2013 Credit Facility”) consistsvalue of the 7,983 shares of Vonage common stock from the signing date to the closing date of $1,298, resulting in a $70,000 senior secured term loantotal acquisition cost was $134,167. We financed the transaction through $32,981 of cash and a $75,000 revolvingfrom our credit facility. The co-borrowersacquisition of Vocalocity immediately positions Vonage as a leader in the SMB hosted VoIP market. SMB and SOHO services will be offered under the 2013 Credit Facility are us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors. We used $42,500 of the available proceeds of the 2013 Credit Facility to retire all of the debt under our 2011 Credit Facility.
Share Repurchase Authorization. On February 7, 2013, Vonage's Board of Directors discontinued the remainder of our existing share repurchase program effective at the close of business on February 12, 2013 with $16,682 remaining, and authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase up to $100,000 of the Company's outstanding shares. This new authorization expires on December 31, 2014. The specific timing and amount of repurchases will vary based on available capital resources and other financial and operational performance, market conditions, securities law limitations, and other factors. The repurchases will be made using our cash resources. The repurchase program may be commenced, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. In any period, cash used in financing activities related to common stock repurchased may differ from the comparable change in stockholders' equity, reflecting timing differences between the recognition of share repurchase transactions and their settlement for cash.Business Solutions brand.
Joint Venture with Datora in BrazilBrazil. . On February 8, 2013, we entered intoWe continue to make progress building the foundation to deliver VoIP services through our second international partnership, a joint venture with Datora Telecomunicacoes Ltda. ("Datora"),in Brazil. The joint venture has completed network testing, finalized plans to host its billing platform, built out its management team, is currently performing integrated production testing, and has established and trained customer care centers. We are also implementing a change to the ownership structure of our joint venture. In late 2013, our partner was unable to meet its capital call obligations resulting in the delivery of a notice to our partner in early 2014 that we would be exercising our dilution rights. As a result, our ownership level in the joint venture is expected to increase to more than 90%. Our joint venture partner continues to contribute to implementation steps and progress building the foundation to deliver communication servicesVoIP services. We do not expect these funding issues to increase risk to our planned market entry in Brazil. Our partner, Datora, is a telecom operator in Brazil delivering managed business-to-business and termination services throughout South America and other partsthe second quarter of the world. Datora also has a significant physical presence in Brazilian economic centers. We expect this partnership to accelerate our entry into the Brazilian market.2014.
Trends in Our Industry and Key Operating Data A number of trends in our industry have a significant effect on our results of operations and are important to an understanding of our financial statements.
Competitive landscape. We face intense competition from traditional telephone companies, wireless companies, cable companies, and alternative voice communication providers. Most traditional wireline and wireless telephone service providers and cable companies are substantially larger and better capitalized than we are
27 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and have the advantage of a large existing customer base. In addition, because our competitors provide other services, they often choose to offer VoIP services or other voice services as part of a bundle that includes other products, such as Internet access, cable television, and home telephone service, with an implied price for telephone service that
24 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
may be significantly below ours. In addition, such competitors may in the future require new customers or existing customers making changes to their service to purchase voice services when purchasing high speed Internet access. Further, as wireless providers offer more minutes at lower prices, better coverage, and companion landline alternative services, their services have become more attractive to households as a replacement for wireline service. We also compete against alternative voice communication providers, such as magicJack, Skype, and Google Voice. Some of these service providers have chosen to sacrifice telephony revenue in order to gain market share and have offered their services at low prices or for free. As we continue to introduce applications that integrate different forms of voice and messaging services over multiple devices, we are facing competition from emerging competitors focused on similar integration, as well as from alternative voice communication providers. In addition, our competitors have partnered and may in the future partner with other competitors to offer products and services, leveraging their collective competitive positions. We also are subject to the risk of future disruptive technologies. In connection with our increasing emphasis on the international long distance market, we face competition from low-cost international calling cards and VoIP providers in addition to traditional telephone companies, cable companies, and wireless companies. In connection with our Vonage Business Solutions SMB and SOHO markets, we face competition from the traditional telephone and cable companies discussed above, as well as from SMB communications providers such as 8x8, Ring Central, and other companies.
Broadband adoption. The number of United States households with broadband Internet access has grown significantly. On March 16, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) released its National Broadband Plan, which seeks, through supporting broadband deployment and programs, to encourage broadband adoption for the approximately 100 million United States residents who do not have broadband at home. We expect the trend of greater
broadband adoption to continue. We benefit from this trend because our service requires a broadband Internet connection and our potential addressable market increases as broadband adoption increases.
Regulation. Our business has developed in a relatively lightly
regulated environment. The United States and other countries, however, are examining how VoIP services should be regulated. A November 2010 order by the FCC that permits states to impose state universal service fund obligations on VoIP service, discussed in Note 10 to our financial statements, is an example of efforts by regulators to determine how VoIP service fits into the telecommunications regulatory landscape. In addition to regulatory matters that directly address VoIP, a number of other regulatory initiatives could impact our business. One such regulatory initiative is net neutrality. In December 2010, the FCC adopted a revised set of net neutrality rules for broadband Internet service providers. These rules makemade it more difficult for broadband Internet service providers to block or discriminate against Vonage service. Several broadband Internet service providers have filed appeals of the FCC's new rules atOn January 14, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals alleging thatvacated the anti-blocking and the unreasonable discrimination provisions of the rules. The D.C. Circuit decision did not foreclose the FCC lacks authority to apply itsfrom adopting anti-blocking or non-discrimination rules to broadband Internet service providers.and the FCC may revisit these issues or appeal the ruling. In addition, on February 9, 2011, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on reforming universal service and the intercarrier compensation (“ICC”) system that governs payments between telecommunications carriers primarily for terminating traffic. The FCC's adoption of an ICC proposal will impact Vonage's costs for telecommunications services. On October 27, 2011, the FCC adopted an order reforming universal service and ICC. The FCC order provides that VoIP originated calls will be subject to interstate access charges for long distance calls and reciprocal compensation for local calls that terminate to the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”). The termination charges for all traffic, including VoIP originated traffic, will transition over several years to a bill and keep arrangement (i.e., no termination charges). Numerous parties filed appeals of the FCC's ICC order. We believe that the order, if effected, will positively impact our costs over time. See also the discussion under "Regulation" in Note 10 to our financial statements for a discussion of regulatory issues that impact us.
The table below includes key operating data that our management uses to measure the growth and operating performance of our business:
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Gross subscriber line additions | 652,750 |
| | 672,274 |
| | 640,205 |
| 652,852 |
| | 652,750 |
| | 672,274 |
|
| Change in net subscriber lines | (15,071 | ) | | (29,996 | ) | | (30,013 | ) | 9,392 |
| | (15,071 | ) | | (29,996 | ) |
| Subscriber lines (at period end) | 2,359,816 |
| | 2,374,887 |
| | 2,404,883 |
| 2,542,926 |
| | 2,359,816 |
| | 2,374,887 |
|
| Average monthly customer churn | 2.6 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 2.6 | % |
| Average monthly operating revenues per line | $ | 29.89 |
| | $ | 30.35 |
| | $ | 30.48 |
| $ | 28.18 |
| | $ | 29.89 |
| | $ | 30.35 |
|
| Average monthly direct cost of telephony services per line | $ | 8.16 |
| | $ | 8.23 |
| | $ | 8.40 |
| $ | 7.27 |
| | $ | 8.16 |
| | $ | 8.23 |
|
| Marketing costs per gross subscriber line addition | $ | 325.61 |
| | $ | 303.84 |
| | $ | 309.54 |
| $ | 347.78 |
| | $ | 325.61 |
| | $ | 303.84 |
|
| Employees (excluding temporary help) (at period end) | 983 |
| | 1,008 |
| | 1,140 |
| 1,243 |
| | 983 |
| | 1,008 |
|
Gross subscriber line additions. Gross subscriber line additions for a particular period are calculated by taking the net subscriber line additions during that particular period and adding to that the number of subscriber lines that terminated during that period. This number does not include subscriber lines both added and terminated during the period, where termination occurred within the first 30 days after activation. The number does include, however, subscriber lines added during the period that are terminated within 30 days of activation but after the end of the period.
NetChange in net subscriber line additions.lines. NetChange in net subscriber line additionslines for a particular period reflectreflects the number of subscriber lines at the end of the period, less the number of subscriber lines at the beginning of the period.
Subscriber lines. Our subscriber lines include, as of a particular date, all paid subscriber lines from which a customer can make an outbound telephone call on that date. Our subscriber lines include
fax lines and soft phones but do not include our virtual phone numbers or toll free numbers, which only allow inbound telephone calls to customers. Subscriber lines decreasedincreased by 15,0719,392, excluding subscriber lines from 2,374,887 as of December 31, 2011Vocalocity prior to acquisition, from 2,359,816 as of December 31, 2012. This decrease was partially attributable to the removal2,542,926, as of unlimited calling to
Pakistan from our Vonage World plan in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to a government imposed increase in termination costs.December 31, 2013.
Average monthly customer churn. Average monthly customer churn for a particular period is calculated by dividing the number of customers that terminated during that period by the simple average number of customers during the period, and dividing the result by the number of months in the period. The simple average number of customers during the period is the number of customers on the first day of the period, plus the number of customers on the last day of the period, divided by two. Terminations, as used in the calculation of churn statistics, do not include customers terminated during the period if termination occurred within the first 30 days after activation. Our average monthly customer churn was flat atdecreased to 2.6%2.5% for 20122013 compared to 2.6% for 20112012. Our average monthly customer churn declined year over year from 2.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2011 to 2.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The decline in churn was a result of reintroduction of a service
28 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
period requirement in certain instances, sustained improvements in customer satisfaction and more effective retention processes. Our average monthly customer churn remainedalso decreased sequentially from 2.6% for the same sequentiallythree months ended September 30, 2013 to 2.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2012 from2013 and was flat compared to the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2012. There was an increase in
25 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
churn due to the removal of unlimited calling to Pakistan from our Vonage World plan as a result of significant increases in call completion costs to Pakistan imposed by regulatory authorities in Pakistan, offset by the decrease in churn as a result of sustained improvements in customer satisfaction and more effective retention processes. We monitor churn on a daily basis and use it as an indicator of the level of customer satisfaction. Other companies may calculate churn differently, and their churn data may not be directly comparable to ours. Customers who have been with us for a year or more tend to have a lower churn rate than customers who have not. In addition, our customers who are residential international callers generally churn at a lower rate than residential customers who are domestic callers. Customers with service period requirements tend to have a lower churn rate than customers without service period requirements. Similar trends are seen between customers obtained through retail sales, which generally do not include service period requirements, and those obtained through non-retail channels, which generally do include such service period requirements. In addition, business customers generally churn at a lower rate than residential customers. Our churn will fluctuate over time due to economic conditions, competitive pressures, marketplace perception of our services, and our ability to provide high quality customer care and network quality and add future innovative products and services.
Average monthly operating revenues per line. Average monthly revenue per line for a particular period is calculated by dividing our total revenue for that period by the simple average number of subscriber lines for the period, and dividing the result by the number of months in the period. The simple average number of subscriber lines for the period is the number of subscriber lines on the first day of the period, plus the number of subscriber lines on the last day of the period, divided by two. Our average monthly revenue per line decreased to $29.8928.18 for 20122013 compared to $30.3529.89 for 20112012. This decrease was due primarily to therate plan mix and lower USF fees. The continued expansion of lower priced plan offerings including BasicTalk to meet customer segment needs and lower activation fee revenue,may cause downward pressure on average monthly revenues per line, offset by any selected pricing actions, higher priced rate plans, and higher USF fees.actions.
Average monthly direct cost of telephony services per line.��Average monthly direct cost of telephony services per line for a particular period is calculated by dividing our direct cost of telephony services for that period by the simple average number of subscriber lines for the period, and dividing the result by the number of months in the period. We use the average monthly direct cost of telephony services per line to evaluate how effective we are at managing our costs of providing service. Our average monthly direct cost of telephony services per line decreased slightlyto $7.27 for 2013 compared to $8.16 for 2012 compared to $8.23 for 2011, due primarily to the decrease in domestic termination costs due to a lower customer base anddriven by more favorable rates negotiated with our service providers, and the decrease in our network costs and in our E-911 costs, offset byand the increase in international calling by our growing base of Vonage World customers and an increasedecrease in regulatory fees.
Direct cost of telephony services both overall and on a per line basis is expected to experience upward pressure from increased international calling by our base of Vonage World customers offset by intelligent call routing, peering relationships, and improved pricing from various carriers.
Marketing cost per gross subscriber line addition. Marketing cost per gross subscriber line addition is calculated by dividing our marketing expense for a particular period by the number of gross subscriber line additions during the period. Marketing expense does not include the cost of certain customer acquisition activities, such as rebates and promotions, which are accounted for as an offset to revenues, or customer equipment subsidies, which are accounted for as direct cost of goods sold. As a result, it does not represent the full cost to us of obtaining a new customer. Our marketing cost per gross subscriber line addition increased to $325.61347.78 for 20122013 from $303.84325.61 in 20112012, due primarily to televisionour investment in BasicTalk including a portion of costs that were fixed and direct mail marketing investment efficiency, the market test of our low-priced domestic offer, and lessnot variable with subscriber line additions due to the removal of unlimited calling to Pakistan from our Vonage World plan in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to a government imposed increase in termination costs.additions.
Employees. Employees represent the number of personnel that are on our payroll and exclude temporary or outsourced labor.
Revenues consist of telephony services revenue and customer equipment and shipping revenue. Substantially all of our revenues are telephony services revenue. In the United States, we offer
domestic and international rate plans to meet the needs of our customers, including a variety of residential plans mobile plans, and small office and home office callingmobile plans. The “Vonage
“Vonage World” plan, now available in the United States and Canada, offers unlimited calling across the United States and Puerto Rico, unlimited international calling to over 60 countries including India, Mexico, and China, subject to certain restrictions, and free voicemail to text messages with Vonage Visual Voicemail. Each of our unlimited plans other than Vonage World offers unlimited domestic calling as well as unlimited calling to Puerto Rico, Canada, and selected European countries, subject to certain restrictions. Each of our basic plans offers a limited number of domestic calling minutes per month. We offer similar plans in Canada. Under our basic plans, we charge on a per minute basis when the number of domestic calling minutes included in the plan is exceeded for a particular month. International calls (except for calls to Puerto Rico, Canada and certain European countries under our unlimited plans and a variety of countries under international calling plans and Vonage World) are charged on a per minute basis. These per minute fees are not included in our monthly subscription fees. Through our recent acquisition of Vocalocity, we offer SMB and SOHO customers several service plans with different pricing structures under the Vonage Business Solutions brand. The service plans include an array of basic and enhanced features applicable to the needs of SMB and SOHO customers. Customers also have the opportunity to purchase premium features for additional fees.
We have begun to integrate the combined operations of Vocalocity, now under the Vonage Business Solutions brand, with Vonage, eliminating overlapping processes and integrating products and sales efforts. We have also begun to optimize lead flow generated by the Vonage brand, directing prospective business customers from Vonage inbound telemarketing or websites to the Vonage Business Solutions website and inbound telesales channels. We expect these efforts to shift certain core gross subscriber line additions and revenue from the Vonage brand to Vonage Business Solutions, leading to subscriber additions with higher total lines and average monthly revenue per line.
In addition to our landline telephony business, we are leveraging our technology to offer services and applications for mobile and other connected devices to address large existing markets. We introduced our first mobile offering in late 2009 and in early 2012 we introduced Vonage Mobile, our all-in-one mobile application that provides free calling and messaging between users who have the application, as well as traditional paid international calling to any other phone. This mobile application works over WiFi, 3G and 4G and in more than 90 countries worldwide. The application consolidates the best features of our prior applications, while adding important functionality, value and ease of use including direct payment through iTunes.
We derive most of our telephony services revenue from monthly subscription fees that we charge our customers under our service plans. We also offer residential fax service, virtual phone numbers, toll free numbers and other services, and charge an additional monthly fee for each service. One business fax line is included with each of our two small office and home office plans, but we charge monthly fees for additional business fax lines. We automatically charge these fees to our customers’ credit cards, debit cards, or electronic check payments (“ECP”), monthly in advance. We also automatically charge the per minute fees not included in our monthly subscription fees to our customers’ credit cards, debit cards or ECP monthly in arrears unless they exceed a certain dollar threshold, in which case they are charged immediately.
By collecting monthly subscription fees in advance and certain other charges immediately after they are incurred, we are able to reduce the amount of accounts receivable that we have outstanding, thus allowing us to have lower working capital requirements. Collecting in this manner also helps us mitigate bad debt losses, which are recorded as a reduction to revenue. If a customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP is declined, we generally suspend international calling capabilities as well as the customer’s ability to incur domestic usage charges in excess of their plan minutes. Historically, in most cases, we are able to correct the problem with the customer within the current monthly billing cycle. If the customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP could not be successfully processed during three billing cycles (i.e., the current and two subsequent monthly billing cycles), we terminate the account.
In the United States, we charge regulatory, compliance, E-911, and intellectual property-related recovery fees on a monthly basis to defray costs, and to cover taxes that we are charged by the suppliers
29 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
of telecommunications services. In addition, we recognize revenue on a gross basis for contributions to the Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and related fees. All other taxes are recorded on a net basis.
In addition, historically, we charged a disconnect fee for customers who terminated their service plan within the first twelve months of service. Disconnect fees are recorded as revenue and are recognized at the time the customer terminates service. Beginning in September 2010, we eliminated the disconnect fee for new customers. In February of 2012 we re-introduced service agreements as an option for new customers.
Telephony services revenue is offset by the cost of certain
26 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
customer acquisition activities, such as rebates and promotions.
Customer equipment and shipping revenue consists of revenue from sales of customer equipment to our wholesalers or directly to customers and retailers. In addition, customer equipment and shipping revenues include revenues from the sale of VoIP telephones in order to access our small and medium business services on a net basis rather than a gross basis as we act as an agent, rather than a principal. Customer equipment and shipping revenue also includes the fees, when collected, that we charge our customers for shipping any equipment to them.
Operating expenses consists of direct cost of telephony services, royalties, direct cost of goods sold, selling, general and administrative expense, marketing expense, depreciation and amortization, and loss from abandonment of software.
Direct cost of telephony services. Direct cost of telephony services primarily consists of fees that we pay to third parties on an ongoing basis in order to provide our services. These fees include:
| |
| > | Access charges that we pay to other telephone companies to terminate domestic and international calls on the public switched telephone network. These costs represented approximately 49%52% and 50%49% of our total direct cost of telephony services for 20122013 and 20112012, respectively, with a portion of these payments ultimately being made to incumbent telephone companies. When a Vonage subscriber calls another Vonage subscriber, we do not pay an access charge. |
| |
| > | The cost of leasing Internet transit services from multiple Internet service providers. This Internet connectivity is used to carry VoIP session initiation signaling and packetized audio media between our subscribers and our regional data centers. |
| |
| > | The cost of leasing from other telephone companies the telephone numbers that we provide to our customers. We lease these telephone numbers on a monthly basis. |
| |
| > | The cost of co-locating our regional data connection point equipment in third-party facilities owned by other telephone companies, Internet service providers or collocation facility providers. |
| |
| > | The cost of providing local number portability, which allows customers to move their existing telephone numbers from another provider to our service. Only regulated telecommunications providers have access to the centralized number databases that facilitate this process. Because we are not a regulated telecommunications provider, we must pay other telecommunications providers to process our local number portability requests. |
| |
| > | The cost of complying with the FCC regulations regarding VoIP emergency services, which require us to provide enhanced emergency dialing capabilities to transmit 911 calls for all of our customers. |
| |
| > | Taxes that we pay on our purchase of telecommunications services from our suppliers or imposed by government agencies such as Federal USF and related fees. |
| |
| > | License fees for use of third party intellectual property. |
Direct cost of goods sold. Direct cost of goods sold primarily consists of costs that we incur when a customer first subscribes to our service. These costs include:
| |
| > | The cost of the equipment that we provide to customers who subscribe to our service through our direct sales channel in excess of activation fees when an activation fee is collected. The remaining cost of customer equipment is deferred up to the activation fee collected and amortized over the estimated average customer life. |
| |
| > | The cost of the equipment that we sell directly to retailers. |
| |
| > | The cost of shipping and handling for customer equipment, together with the installation manual, that we ship to customers. |
| |
| > | The cost of certain products or services that we give customers as promotions. |
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense includes:
| |
| > | Compensation and benefit costs for all employees, which is |
the largest component of selling, general and administrative
expense and includes customer care, research and development, network engineering and operations, sales and marketing, executive, legal, finance, and human resources personnel.
| |
| > | Share-based expense related to share-based awards to employees, directors, and consultants. |
| |
| > | Outsourced labor related to customer care, kiosk and community based events teams, and retail in-store support activities. |
| |
| > | Product awareness advertising. |
| |
| > | Transaction fees paid to credit card, debit card, and ECP companies and other third party billers such as iTunes, which may include a per transaction charge in addition to a percent of billings charge. |
| |
| > | Rent and related expenses. |
| |
| > | Professional fees for legal, accounting, tax, public relations, lobbying, and development activities. |
| |
| > | Acquisition related transaction and integration costs. |
Marketing expense. Marketing expense consists of:
| |
| > | Advertising costs, which comprise a majority of our marketing expense and include online, television, direct mail, alternative media, promotions, sponsorships, and inbound and outbound telemarketing. |
| |
| > | Creative and production costs. |
| |
| > | The costs to serve and track our online advertising. |
| |
| > | Certain amounts we pay to retailers for activation commissions. |
| |
| > | The cost associated with our customer referral program. |
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses include:
| |
| > | Depreciation of our network equipment, furniture and fixtures, and employee computer equipment. |
| |
| > | Amortization of leasehold improvements and purchased and developed software. |
| |
| > | Amortization of intangible assets (patents(developed technology, customer relationships, non-compete agreements, patents, trademarks and trademarks)trade names). |
| |
| > | Loss on disposal or impairment of property and equipment. |
Loss from abandonment of software assets. Loss from abandonment of software assets include:
| |
| > | Impairment of investment in software assets. |
30 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Other Income (Expense) consists of:
| |
| > | Interest income on cash and cash equivalents. |
| |
| > | Interest expense on notes payable, patent litigation judgments and settlements, and capital leases. |
| |
| > | Amortization of debt related costs. |
| |
| > | Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency. |
| |
| > | Debt conversion expense relating to the conversion of notes payable to equity. |
| |
> | Gain (loss) on extinguishment of notes. |
| |
| > | Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant. |
27 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of consolidated operating revenues, our consolidated statement of operationsincome for the periods indicated:
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct cost of telephony services (excluding depreciation and amortization) | 27 |
| | 27 |
| | 28 |
| 26 |
| | 27 |
| | 27 |
|
| Direct cost of goods sold | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 6 |
| 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 28 |
| | 27 |
| | 27 |
| 32 |
| | 28 |
| | 27 |
|
| Marketing | 25 |
| | 24 |
| | 22 |
| 27 |
| | 25 |
| | 24 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 4 |
| | 4 |
| | 6 |
| 4 |
| | 4 |
| | 4 |
|
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
|
| | 92 |
| | 87 |
| | 89 |
| 94 |
| | 92 |
| | 87 |
|
| Income from operations | 8 |
| | 13 |
| | 11 |
| 6 |
| | 8 |
| | 13 |
|
| Other Income (Expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest expense | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | |
| Change in fair value of stock warrant | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of notes | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| Other expense, net | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (20 | ) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit | 7 |
| | 10 |
| | (9 | ) | |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (3 | ) | | 37 |
| | — |
| |
| Net income (loss) | 4 | % | | 47 | % | | (9 | )% | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 5 |
| | 7 |
| | 10 |
|
| Income tax expense | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | | 37 |
|
| Net income | | 3 | % | | 4 | % | | 47 | % |
| Plus: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Net income attributable to Vonage | | 3 | % | | 4 | % | | 47 | % |
2831 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
Summary of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011
| | | Revenues, Direct Cost of Telephony Services and Direct Cost of Good Sold | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Revenues | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | 885,042 |
| | $ | (21,209 | ) | | $ | (14,719 | ) | | (2 | )% | | (2 | )% | $ | 829,067 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | (20,047 | ) | | $ | (21,209 | ) | | (2 | )% | | (2 | )% |
| Direct cost of telephony services (1) | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
| | 243,794 |
| | (4,272 | ) | | (7,645 | ) | | (2 | )% | | (3 | )% | 213,712 |
| | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
| | (18,165 | ) | | (4,272 | ) | | (8 | )% | | (2 | )% |
| Direct cost of goods sold | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
| | 55,965 |
| | (2,623 | ) | | (14,209 | ) | | (6 | )% | | (25 | )% | 37,586 |
| | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
| | (1,547 | ) | | (2,623 | ) | | (4 | )% | | (6 | )% |
(1) Excludes depreciation and amortization of $15,11514,892, $15,82415,115, and $18,72515,824, respectively.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenues. The decrease in revenues of $20,047, or 2%, was primarily driven by a decrease of $17,573 in monthly subscription fees resulting from rate plan mix, lower customer acquisitions on premium plans, prior year line losses, and retention activities partially offset by revenue from Vocalocity since the acquisition that closed on November 15, 2013. There was also a decrease in activation fees of $1,077 and a decrease in other revenue of $996 due to lower rates from our revenue sharing partners. There was an increase in credits issued to subscribers of $2,449, a decrease in additional features revenue of $1,090, and a decrease in international minutes of use revenue of $1,234. These decreases were offset by an increase in fees that we charged for disconnecting our service of $1,024 due to reinstatement of contracts for new customers beginning in February 2012, and an increase in our regulatory fee revenue of $3,784, which includes a decrease of $7,771 in USF fees offset by an increase in regulatory recovery fees and E-911 fees of $11,555.
Direct cost of telephony services. The decrease in direct cost of telephony services of $18,165, or 8%, was primarily driven by a decrease in domestic termination costs of $1,290 due to improved termination rates, which are costs that we pay other phone companies for terminating phone calls, and fewer minutes of use and a decrease in our network costs of $5,962, which includes costs for co-locating in other carriers’ facilities, leasing phone numbers, routing calls on the Internet, E-911 costs, and transferring calls to and from the Internet to the public switched telephone network. There was also a decrease in other costs of $678, a decrease in international usage of $2,413 driven by improved termination rates, and a decrease of USF and related fees imposed by government agencies of $7,775.
Direct cost of goods sold. The decrease in direct cost of goods sold of $1,547, or 4%, was primarily due to a decrease in waived activation fees for new customers of $5,566 due to lower direct customer adds, a decrease in shipping costs of $1,598, and a decrease in amortization costs on deferred customer equipment of $585, offset by an increase in customer equipment costs of $6,204 from additional customers from our retail expansion.
2012 compared to 2011
Revenues. The decrease in revenues of $21,209,$21,209, or 2%, was primarily driven by a decrease of $21,307 in monthly subscription fees resulting from a decreased number of subscription lines, which reduced from 2,374,887 at December 31, 2011 to 2,359,816 at December 31, 2012,, and plan mix, a decrease in activation fees of $3,850, and a decrease in overage in plan minutes of $864. There was an increase in rebates and credits issued to subscribers of $249 and a decrease in additional features revenue of $1,424 due primarily to customers opting for our Vonage World offering, which now includes directory assistance and voice mail to text. In addition, there was a decrease of $1,663 in equipment and shipping revenue due to lower direct customer additions and elimination of equipment recovery fees for new customers and a decrease in other revenue of $2,578 due to lower rates from our revenue sharing partners. These decreases were offset by a decrease of $1,064 in bad debt expense due to improved customer credit quality and lower non-pay churn, and an increase in our regulatory fee revenue of $7,473, which includes an increase of $7,231 in USF fees. There was also an increase in international minutes of use revenue of $390 and an increase in fees that we charged for disconnecting our service of $1,798 due to reinstatement of contracts for new customers beginning in February 2012.
Direct cost of telephony services. The decrease in direct cost of telephony services of $4,272,$4,272, or 2%, was primarily due to a decrease in domestic termination costs of $8,538 due to improved termination rates, which are costs that we pay other phone companies for terminating phone calls, and fewer minutes of use and a decrease in our network costs of $7,550, which includes costs for co-locating in other carriers’ facilities, leasing phone numbers, routing calls on the Internet, E-911 costs, and transferring calls to and from the Internet to the public switched telephone network due to improved rates. There was also a decrease in local number portability costs of $837 due to lower rates and a decrease in other costs of $503. These decreases were partially offset by an increased cost of $5,386 from higher international call volume associated with Vonage World, an increased cost of $7,231 for USF and related fees imposed by government agencies, and an increase in other taxes and surcharges of $540.
Direct cost of goods sold. The decrease in direct cost of goods sold of $2,623,$2,623, or 6%, was primarily due to a decrease in amortization costs on deferred customer equipment of $2,918, a decrease in waived activation fees for new customers of $4,711 due to lower direct customer adds, and a decrease in shipping costs of $300. These decreases were offset by an increase in customer equipment costs of $5,303 from additional customers from our retail expansion started in the second quarter of 2011.
2011 compared to 2010
Revenues. The decrease in revenues of $14,719, or 2%, was primarily driven by a decrease in activation fees of $13,193 as the historical deferred activation fees are amortized and new activation fees are no longer charged and deferred, a decrease in fees that we charged for disconnecting our service of $8,587 due to fewer disconnections and elimination of this fee for new customers beginning in September 2010, and a reduction in international minutes of use revenue of $2,248 primarily due to customers moving, as expected, to our fixed rate Vonage World plan. In addition, there was an increase in rebates and credits issued to subscribers of $2,889 and a decrease in additional features revenue of $3,420 due primarily to customers opting for our Vonage World offering, which now includes directory assistance and voice mail to text. There was also a decrease in equipment sales, net of rebates, of $7,508 related to lower equipment recovery fees due to fewer disconnections and elimination of equipment recovery fees for new customers beginning in September 2010 and a decrease in customer shipping revenue of $837 due to higher priority shipping in 2010, partially offset by higher customer additions in 2011. These decreases were offset by an increase in our regulatory recovery and E-911 fees of $9,000 that we collected from subscribers due to pricing actions in 2010, which included $4,257 of USF and related fees, a decrease of $10,455 in bad debt expense due to improved customer credit quality and lower non-pay churn, an increase in other revenue of $1,268, and an increase in monthly subscription fees of $3,153 due to changes in plan mix.
Direct cost of telephony services. The decrease in direct cost of telephony services of $7,645, or 3%, was primarily due to a decrease in domestic termination costs of $16,828 due to improved termination rates, which are costs that we pay other phone companies for terminating phone calls, and fewer minutes of use and a decrease in our network costs of $7,258, which includes costs for co-locating in other carriers’ facilities, leasing phone numbers, routing calls on the Internet, E-911 costs, and transferring calls to and from the Internet to the public switched telephone network due to improved rates. There was also a decrease in other cost of $920 and a decrease in local number portability costs of $838 due to lower rates. These decreases were partially offset by an increased cost of $14,739 from higher international call volume associated with Vonage World and an increase of USF and related fees imposed by government agencies of $3,460.
Direct cost of goods sold. The decrease in direct cost of goods sold of $14,209, or 25%, was primarily due to a decrease in customer equipment costs of $5,758 resulting from a lower cost device introduced in September 2010 and lower home installations. There was also a corresponding decrease in shipping costs of $595 and a decrease in amortization costs on deferred customer equipment of $10,572 as the historical deferred customer equipment costs are amortized and new customer equipment costs are no longer charged and deferred. These decreases were offset by an increase in waived activation fees for new customers of $2,716.
2932 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
| | | Selling, General and Administrative | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 242,368 |
| | $ | 234,754 |
| | $ | 238,986 |
| | $ | 7,614 |
| | $ | (4,232 | ) | | 3 | % | | (2 | )% | $ | 262,302 |
| | $ | 242,368 |
| | $ | 234,754 |
| | $ | 19,934 |
| | $ | 7,614 |
| | 8 | % | | 3 | % |
2013 compared to 2012
Selling, general and administrative. For the year ended 2013 compared to the year ended 2012, selling expense increased by $12,641 including $3,701 due to the expansion of the number of community sales teams, and $10,749 due to an increase in the number of retail stores with assisted selling and the nationwide BasicTalk launch, offset by a decrease of $2,158 related to product awareness advertising of our mobile offering launched in February 2012. For the year ended 2013 compared to the year ended 2012, general and administrative expense increased by $7,293 due mainly to higher share based cost of $5,868, an increase in compensation and employee related expense of $7,703 including expense from Vocalocity since the acquisition that closed on November 15, 2013, and an increase in professional fees of $1,798. There was also an increase in taxes of $2,082 and an increase in acquisition related costs of $2,768 related to the acquisition of Vocalocity, primarily related to professional fees. These increases were offset by a resolution of an insurance claim for prior period legal fees and settlement expenses of $2,300, lower customer care costs of $7,145, and a decrease in telecommunications expenses of $1,100. There was also a decrease in settlement cost of $972 and a decrease in other expense of $1,122.
2012 compared to 2011
Selling, general and administrative. Selling expense increased by $9,831 including $4,286 due to the expansion of the number of community sales teams, $2,189 due to an increase in the number of retail outlets with assisted selling, and $3,256 related to our new mobile offering launched in February 2012 and our Digital Calling Card launched in the fourth quarter of 2012. General and administrative expense decreased by $2,217 due to a decrease in credit card fees of $3,064 as a result of the Durbin Amendment, lower uncollected state and municipal tax expense of $965, and lower share based cost of $2,304, including a reversal of executive stock compensation expense of $1,200. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in compensation and benefits related expense of $3,669 driven by higher salary related expense of $6,486 offset by a decrease in outsourced temporary labor of $2,577, of which $2,118 was related to Customer Care.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Marketing | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Marketing | $ | 227,052 |
| | $ | 212,540 |
| | $ | 204,263 |
| | $ | 14,512 |
| | $ | 8,277 |
| | 7 | % | | 4 | % |
20112013 compared to 20102012
Selling, general and administrative.Marketing. Selling expense increased by $6,425 including $5,981 due to the expansion of the number of community sales teams and $869 due to anThe increase in the number of retail outlets with assisted selling partially offset by lower retail commissions of $425. General and administrative expense decreased by $10,657 due to a decrease in compensation and benefits relatedmarketing expense of $9,591 driven by lower salary related expense of $6,554 and lower outsourced temporary labor of $2,714, of which $2,223 is related to Customer Care. In addition, we had a decrease in credit card fees of $1,957$14,512, or 7%, as a result of our investment for the Durbin Amendment, lower settlementnationwide launch of BasicTalk including a portion of costs related to litigationthat were fixed and contractual disputes of $2,506, lower uncollected state and municipal tax expense of $1,922, and lower professional fees of $572. These decreases were offset by an increase in share based cost of $6,024.not variable with subscriber line additions.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Marketing | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
|
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| |
| Marketing | $ | 212,540 |
| | $ | 204,263 |
| | $ | 198,170 |
| | $ | 8,277 |
| | $ | 6,093 |
| | 4 | % | | 3 | % |
2012 compared to 2011
Marketing. The increase in marketing expense of $8,277,$8,277, or 4%, resulted from increasing our marketing investment in direct mail and retail to reach targeted ethnic segments and incremental media expenses associated with the market test of our low-priced domestic offer partially offset by the decrease in television advertising.
2011 compared to 2010
Marketing. The increase in marketing expense of $6,093, or 3%, resulted from increasing our marketing investment in direct mail to targeted ethnic segments which drove a 5% improvement in gross subscriber line additions.
| | | Depreciation and Amortization | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 33,324 |
| | $ | 37,051 |
| | $ | 53,073 |
| | $ | (3,727 | ) | | $ | (16,022 | ) | | (10 | )% | | (30 | )% | $ | 36,066 |
| | $ | 33,324 |
| | $ | 37,051 |
| | $ | 2,742 |
| | $ | (3,727 | ) | | 8 | % | | (10 | )% |
2013 compared to 2012
Depreciation and amortization. The increase in depreciation and amortization of $2,742, or 8%, was primarily due to the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles of $2,483 and an increase in software amortization of $1,553 partially offset by lower depreciation of network equipment, computer hardware, and furniture of $1,295.
2012 compared to 2011
Depreciation and amortization. The decrease in depreciation and amortization of $3,727,$3,727, or 10%, was primarily due to lower depreciation of network equipment, computer hardware, and furniture of $2,356 and lower software amortization of $2,471 due to certain projects being fully amortized, offset by an increase in intangible asset amortization of $1,098 from additional intangible assets acquired during the fourth quarter of 2011.
33 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2,013 |
| | 2,012 |
| | 2,011 |
| |
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,262 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (25.262 | ) | | $ | 25.262 |
| | (100 | )% | | 100 | % |
20112013 compared to 2010
Depreciation and amortization. The decrease in depreciation and amortization of $16,022, or 30%, was primarily due to lower software amortization of $10,455 due to our internally developed customer acquisition and customer care automation tools projects being fully amortized, lower depreciation of network equipment, computer hardware, and furniture of $5,284, and lower impairment charges of $411.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2,012 |
| | 2,011 |
| | 2,010 |
| |
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | $ | 25,262 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,262 |
| | $ | — |
| | 100 | % | | * |
2012 compared to 2011
Loss from abandonment of software assets. The loss from abandonment of software assets of $25,262$25,262 in 2012 was due to the write-off of our investment in the Amdocs system, net of settlement amounts to the Company, during the second quarter of 2012.
20112012 compared to 20102011
Loss from abandonment of software assets. None.The loss from abandonment of software assets of $25,262 in 2012 was due to the write-off of our investment in the Amdocs system, net of settlement amounts to the Company, during the second quarter of 2012.
30 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
| | | Other Income (Expense) | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Interest income | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 519 |
| | $ | (26 | ) | | $ | (384 | ) | | (19 | )% | | (74 | )% | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 198 |
| | $ | (26 | ) | | 182 | % | | (19 | )% |
| Interest expense | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) | | (48,541 | ) | | 11,132 |
| | 31,423 |
| | 65 | % | | 65 | % | (6,557 | ) | | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) | | (571 | ) | | 11,132 |
| | (10 | )% | | 65 | % |
| Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant | — |
| | (950 | ) | | (99,338 | ) | | 950 |
| | 98,388 |
| | 100 | % | | 99 | % | |
| Change in fair value of stock warrant | | — |
| | — |
| | (950 | ) | | — |
| | 950 |
| | — | % | | 100 | % |
| Loss on extinguishment of notes | — |
| | (11,806 | ) | | (31,023 | ) | | 11,806 |
| | 19,217 |
| | 100 | % | | 62 | % | — |
| | — |
| | (11,806 | ) | | — |
| | 11,806 |
| | — | % | | 100 | % |
| Other expense, net | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (18 | ) | | 260 |
| | (253 | ) | | 96 | % | | * |
| (104 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (93 | ) | | 260 |
| | (845 | )% | | 96 | % |
| | $ | (5,888 | ) | | $ | (30,010 | ) | | $ | (178,401 | ) | | | | | | | | | $ | (6,354 | ) | | $ | (5,888 | ) | | $ | (30,010 | ) | | | | | | | | |
2013 compared to 2012
Interest income. Interest income increased $198, or 182%.
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense of $571, or 10%, was due mainly to a higher principal balance on our credit facility entered into in connection with our refinancing in February 2013 than the remaining principal balance on our credit facility entered into in connection with our refinancing in July 2011 and the funds we borrowed from the 2013 revolving credit facility in November 2013 in connection with the acquisition of Vocalocity.
Other expense, net. Other expense, net increased by $93 in 2013 compared to 2012.
2012 compared to 2011
Interest income. Interest income decreased $26,$26, or 19%.
Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense of $11,132,$11,132, or 65%, was due to lower principal outstanding and the reduced interest rate on the 2011 Credit Facility.
Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant. The change in the fair value of our stock warrant fluctuated with changes in the price of our common stock and was an expense of $950 in 2011, as the stock warrant was exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2011. An increase in our stock price resulted in expense while a decrease in our stock price resulted in income.
Loss on extinguishment of notes. The loss on extinguishment of notes of $11,806 in 2011 was due to the acceleration of unamortized debt discount and debt related costs in connection with prepayments of the credit facility we entered into in December 2010 (the "2010 Credit Facility") and our refinancing of the 2010 Credit Facility in July 2011.
Other. Net other income and expense decreased by $260$260 in 2012 compared to 2011.2011.
2011 compared to 2010
Interest income. The decrease in interest income of $384, or 74%, was due to lower interest rates and lower average cash balances driven by prepayments on the 2010 Credit Facility and the repayments on the 2011 Credit Facility.
Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense of $31,423, or 65%, was due to the reduced interest rate on our 2010 Credit Facility and our 2011 Credit Facility resulting from our refinancings
in December 2010 and July 2011 and lower principal outstanding due to the refinancings and prepayments in 2011.
Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant. The change in fair value of the embedded conversion option within our prior third lien convertible notes fluctuated with changes in the price of our common stock and was $0 during 2011 compared to loss of $7,308 in 2010 as all convertible notes had been converted as of December 31, 2010. The change in the fair value of our stock warrant fluctuated with changes in the price of our common stock and was an expense of $950 in 2011 compared to $344 in 2010. An increase in our stock price resulted in expense while a decrease in our stock price resulted in income. In addition, due to the progress of our repurchase negotiations and other factors, the make-whole premiums in our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and prior senior secured second lien credit facility from our 2008 financing were ascribed a value of $91,686 at the time the make-whole premiums were paid in December 2010.
Loss on extinguishment of notes. The loss on extinguishment of notes of $11,806 in 2011 was due to the acceleration of unamortized debt discount and debt related costs in connection with prepayments of our 2010 Credit Facility and our refinancing of the 2010 Credit Facility in July 2011. The loss on extinguishment of notes of $31,023 in 2010 was due to the acceleration of unamortized debt discount, debt related costs, and administrative agent fees associated with our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and prior senior secured second lien credit facility from our 2008 financing prepayments partially offset by gains associated with conversion of our prior third lien convertible notes.
Other. Net other income and expense decreased by $253 in 2011 compared to 2010.
| | | Income Tax Benefit (Expense) | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| |
| Income Tax (Expense) Benefit | | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | $ | (22,095 | ) | | $ | 322,704 |
| | $ | (318 | ) | | $ | (18,194 | ) | | $ | (22,095 | ) | | $ | 322,704 |
| | $ | 3,901 |
| | $ | (344,799 | ) | | 18 | % | | (107 | )% |
| Effective tax rate | 38 | % | | (375 | )% | | — | % | | | | | | | | | 39 | % | | 38 | % | | (375 | )% | | | | | | | | |
We recognize income tax expense equal to our pre-tax income multiplied by our effective income tax rate, an expense that had not been recognized prior to the reduction of the valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2011. In addition, adjustments were recorded for discrete period items related to stock compensation and changes to our state effective tax rate.
The provision also includes the federal alternative minimum tax in 2012 and 2011 and state and local income taxes in 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010.2011.
We are required to record a valuation allowance which reduces net deferred tax assets if we conclude that it is more likely than not that taxable income generated in the future will be insufficient to
utilize the future income tax benefit from these net deferred tax assets prior to expiration. Our net deferred tax assets primarily consist of net
operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”). We periodically review this conclusion, which requires significant management judgment. Until the fourth quarter of 2011, we recorded a valuation allowance which reduced our net deferred tax assets to zero. In the fourth quarter of 2011, based upon our sustained profitable operating performance over the past three years excluding certain losses associated with our prior convertible notes and our December 2010 debt refinancing and our positive outlook for taxable income in the future, our evaluation determined that the benefit resulting from our net deferred tax assets (namely, the NOLs) are likely to be usable prior to their expiration. Accordingly, we released
34 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
the related valuation allowance against our United States and Canada net deferred tax assets, and a portion of the allowance against our state net deferred tax assets as certain NOLs may expire prior to utilization due to shorter utilization periods in certain states, resulting in a one-time non-cash income tax benefit of $325,601$325,601 that we recorded in our
31 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
statement of operationsincome and a corresponding net deferred tax asset of $325,601$325,601 that we recorded on our balance sheet on December 31, 2011. In the future, if available evidence changes our conclusion that it is more likely than not that we will utilize our net deferred tax assets prior to their expiration, we will make an adjustment to the related valuation allowance and income tax expense at that time.
We participated in the State of New Jersey’s corporation business tax benefit certificate transfer program, which allows certain high technology and biotechnology companies to transfer unused New Jersey net operating loss carryovers to other New Jersey corporation business taxpayers. During 2003 and 2004, we submitted an application to the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, or EDA, to participate in the program and the application was approved. The EDA then issued a certificate certifying our eligibility to participate in the program. The program requires that a purchaser pay at least 75% of the amount of the surrendered tax benefit. In tax years 2010, 2011, and
2012, we sold approximately, $2,194, $0, and $0, respectively, of our New Jersey State net operating loss carry forwards for a recognized benefit of approximately $168 in 2010, $0 in 2011, and $0 in 2012. Collectively, all transactions represent approximately 85% of the surrendered tax benefit each year and have been recognized in the year received.
As of December 31, 20122013, we had net operating loss carry forwards for United States federal and state tax purposes, including the NOLs of Vocalocity as of the date of acquisition, of $744,139715,524 and $290,196251,627, respectively, expiring at various times from years ending 2013 through 20302033. In addition, we had net operating loss carry forwards for Canadian tax purposes of $25,47614,171 expiring through 20282027. We also had net operating loss carry forwards for United Kingdom tax purposes of $37,76541,423 with no expiration date.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) | For the Years Ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Dollar Change 2011 vs. 2010 |
| | Percent Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change
2011 vs. 2010 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | | $ | (372,417 | ) | | $ | 492,709 |
| | (91 | )% | | 589 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Net income | $ | 27,801 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (8,826 | ) | | $ | (372,417 | ) | | (24 | )% | | (91 | )% |
2013 compared to 2012
Net Income. Based on the activity described above, our net income of $27,801 for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $8,826, or 24%, from net income of $36,627 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
2012 compared to 2011
Net Income. Based on the activity described above, our net income of $36,627 for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $372,417, or 91%, from net income of $409,044 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | $ | 488 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 488 |
| | $ | — |
| | 100 | % | | — | % |
2013 compared to 2012
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. The net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of $36,627488 for the year ended December 31, 20122013 decreased by $372,417, or 91%, fromrepresented 30% of the net incomeloss of a consolidated subsidiary in Brazil.$409,044 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
20112012 compared to 20102011
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. None.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Vonage | For the years ended December 31, | | | Dollar Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Dollar Change 2012 vs. 2011 |
| | Percent Change 2013 vs. 2012 |
| | Percent Change
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| |
| Net income attributable to Vonage | $ | 28,289 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (8,338 | ) | | $ | (372,417 | ) | | (23 | )% | | (91 | )% |
2013 compared to 2012
Net Income (Loss).attributable to Vonage. Based on the activity described above, our net income attributable to Vonage of $28,289 for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $8,338, or 23%, from net income of $36,627 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
2012 compared to 2011
Net Income attributable to Vonage. Based on the activity described above, our net income attributable to Vonage of $36,627 for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $372,417, or 91%, from net income of $409,044 for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $492,709, or 589%, from net loss of $83,665 for the year ended December 31, 2010.2011.
3235 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following table sets forth quarterly statement of operations data. We derived this data from our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which we believe have been prepared on substantially the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements. The operating results in any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
| | | | For the Quarter Ended | | For the quarter ended | |
| (dollars in thousands, except operating data) | Mar 31,
2011 |
| | Jun 30,
2011 |
| | Sep 30,
2011 |
| | Dec 31,
2011 |
| | Mar 31,
2012 |
| | Jun 30,
2012 |
| | Sep 30,
2012 |
| | Dec 31,
2012 |
| Mar 31,
2012 |
| | Jun 30,
2012 |
| | Sep 30,
2012 |
| | Dec 31,
2012 |
| | Mar 31,
2013 |
| | Jun 30,
2013 |
| | Sep 30,
2013 |
| | Dec 31,
2013 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 219,841 |
| | $ | 218,285 |
| | $ | 216,507 |
| | $ | 215,690 |
| | $ | 215,903 |
| | $ | 211,916 |
| | $ | 207,584 |
| | $ | 213,711 |
| $ | 215,903 |
| | $ | 211,916 |
| | $ | 207,584 |
| | $ | 213,711 |
| | $ | 209,087 |
| | $ | 204,776 |
| | $ | 203,984 |
| | $ | 211,220 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct cost of telephony services (1) | 60,189 |
| | 57,883 |
| | 59,230 |
| | 58,847 |
| | 61,623 |
| | 58,195 |
| | 55,245 |
| | 56,814 |
| 61,623 |
| | 58,195 |
| | 55,245 |
| | 56,814 |
| | 55,181 |
| | 53,527 |
| | 52,882 |
| | 52,122 |
|
| Direct cost of goods sold | 11,055 |
| | 9,865 |
| | 10,711 |
| | 10,125 |
| | 9,846 |
| | 9,275 |
| | 10,444 |
| | 9,568 |
| 9,846 |
| | 9,275 |
| | 10,444 |
| | 9,568 |
| | 8,878 |
| | 9,217 |
| | 9,535 |
| | 9,956 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 58,243 |
| | 58,481 |
| | 59,451 |
| | 58,579 |
| | 61,835 |
| | 58,396 |
| | 59,676 |
| | 62,461 |
| 61,835 |
| | 58,396 |
| | 59,676 |
| | 62,461 |
| | 62,910 |
| | 61,481 |
| | 64,752 |
| | 73,159 |
|
| Marketing | 49,404 |
| | 52,211 |
| | 51,044 |
| | 51,604 |
| | 53,422 |
| | 54,956 |
| | 51,361 |
| | 52,801 |
| 53,422 |
| | 54,956 |
| | 51,361 |
| | 52,801 |
| | 51,669 |
| | 58,330 |
| | 59,133 |
| | 57,920 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 11,066 |
| | 8,664 |
| | 8,683 |
| | 8,638 |
| | 8,644 |
| | 8,518 |
| | 8,110 |
| | 8,052 |
| 8,644 |
| | 8,518 |
| | 8,110 |
| | 8,052 |
| | 7,975 |
| | 8,205 |
| | 8,459 |
| | 11,427 |
|
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | 189,957 |
| | 187,104 |
| | 189,119 |
| | 187,793 |
| | 195,370 |
| | 214,602 |
| | 184,836 |
| | 189,696 |
| 195,370 |
| | 214,602 |
| | 184,836 |
| | 189,696 |
| | 186,613 |
| | 190,760 |
| | 194,761 |
| | 204,584 |
|
| Income from operations | 29,884 |
| | 31,181 |
| | 27,388 |
| | 27,897 |
| | 20,533 |
| | (2,686 | ) | | 22,748 |
| | 24,015 |
| 20,533 |
| | (2,686 | ) | | 22,748 |
| | 24,015 |
| | 22,474 |
| | 14,016 |
| | 9,223 |
| | 6,636 |
|
| Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | 42 |
| | 37 |
| | 33 |
| | 23 |
| | 20 |
| | 30 |
| | 30 |
| | 29 |
| 20 |
| | 30 |
| | 30 |
| | 29 |
| | 37 |
| | 74 |
| | 97 |
| | 99 |
|
| Interest expense | (6,602 | ) | | (5,588 | ) | | (2,926 | ) | | (2,002 | ) | | (1,751 | ) | | (1,566 | ) | | (1,402 | ) | | (1,267 | ) | (1,751 | ) | | (1,566 | ) | | (1,402 | ) | | (1,267 | ) | | (1,457 | ) | | (1,732 | ) | | (1,509 | ) | | (1,859 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant | (950 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Loss on extinguishment of notes | (593 | ) | | (3,228 | ) | | (7,985 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Other, net | (2 | ) | | 44 |
| | (47 | ) | | (266 | ) | | 42 |
| | (65 | ) | | 28 |
| | (16 | ) | 42 |
| | (65 | ) | | 28 |
| | (16 | ) | | (39 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (33 | ) |
| | (8,105 | ) | | (8,735 | ) | | (10,925 | ) | | (2,245 | ) | | (1,689 | ) | | (1,601 | ) | | (1,344 | ) | | (1,254 | ) | (1,689 | ) | | (1,601 | ) | | (1,344 | ) | | (1,254 | ) | | (1,459 | ) | | (1,675 | ) | | (1,427 | ) | | (1,793 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit | 21,779 |
| | 22,446 |
| | 16,463 |
| | 25,652 |
| | 18,844 |
| | (4,287 | ) | | 21,404 |
| | 22,761 |
| 18,844 |
| | (4,287 | ) | | 21,404 |
| | 22,761 |
| | 21,015 |
| | 12,341 |
| | 7,796 |
| | 4,843 |
|
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (666 | ) | | (698 | ) | | (426 | ) | | 324,494 |
| | (4,923 | ) | | 947 |
| | (8,191 | ) | | (9,928 | ) | (4,923 | ) | | 947 |
| | (8,191 | ) | | (9,928 | ) | | (7,968 | ) | | (4,894 | ) | | (3,811 | ) | | (1,521 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 21,113 |
| | $ | 21,748 |
| | $ | 16,037 |
| | $ | 350,146 |
| | $ | 13,921 |
| | $ | (3,340 | ) | | $ | 13,213 |
| | $ | 12,833 |
| 13,921 |
| | (3,340 | ) | | 13,213 |
| | 12,833 |
| | 13,047 |
| | 7,447 |
| | 3,985 |
| | 3,322 |
|
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plus: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 222 |
| | 266 |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to Vonage | | $ | 13,921 |
| | $ | (3,340 | ) | | $ | 13,213 |
| | $ | 12,833 |
| | $ | 13,047 |
| | $ | 7,447 |
| | $ | 4,207 |
| | $ | 3,588 |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to Vonage per common share: | | Net income (loss) attributable to Vonage per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 1.55 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
|
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 222,162 |
| | 224,233 |
| | 225,281 |
| | 225,572 |
| | 225,732 |
| | 226,429 |
| | 225,555 |
| | 219,379 |
| 225,732 |
| | 226,429 |
| | 225,555 |
| | 219,379 |
| | 214,639 |
| | 212,169 |
| | 209,589 |
| | 209,928 |
|
| Diluted | 240,340 |
| | 244,590 |
| | 241,189 |
| | 237,342 |
| | 236,036 |
| | 226,429 |
| | 233,708 |
| | 228,107 |
| 236,036 |
| | 226,429 |
| | 233,708 |
| | 228,107 |
| | 223,202 |
| | 219,837 |
| | 217,059 |
| | 219,600 |
|
| Operating Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross subscriber line additions | 175,388 |
| | 158,004 |
| | 170,344 |
| | 168,538 |
| | 165,454 |
| | 163,349 |
| | 171,628 |
| | 152,319 |
| 165,454 |
| | 163,349 |
| | 171,628 |
| | 152,319 |
| | 148,003 |
| | 155,412 |
| | 174,670 |
| | 174,767 |
|
| Change in net subscriber line | 3,345 |
| | (10,568 | ) | | (8,939 | ) | | (13,834 | ) | | (18,739 | ) | | (64 | ) | | 9,440 |
| | (5,708 | ) | (18,739 | ) | | (64 | ) | | 9,440 |
| | (5,708 | ) | | (12,400 | ) | | 2,541 |
| | 10,738 |
| | 8,513 |
|
| Subscriber lines at end of period | 2,408,228 |
| | 2,397,660 |
| | 2,388,721 |
| | 2,374,887 |
| | 2,356,148 |
| | 2,356,084 |
| | 2,365,524 |
| | 2,359,816 |
| 2,356,148 |
| | 2,356,084 |
| | 2,365,524 |
| | 2,359,816 |
| | 2,347,416 |
| | 2,349,957 |
| | 2,360,695 |
| | 2,542,926 |
|
| Average monthly customer churn | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 2.8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | 2.8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 2.5 | % |
| Average monthly operating revenues per line | $ | 30.45 |
| | $ | 30.28 |
| | $ | 30.16 |
| | $ | 30.19 |
| | $ | 30.42 |
| | $ | 29.98 |
| | $ | 29.31 |
| | $ | 30.15 |
| $ | 30.42 |
| | $ | 29.98 |
| | $ | 29.31 |
| | $ | 30.15 |
| | $ | 29.61 |
| | $ | 29.06 |
| | $ | 28.87 |
| | $ | 28.72 |
|
| Average monthly direct costs of telephony services per line | $ | 8.34 |
| | $ | 8.03 |
| | $ | 8.25 |
| | $ | 8.24 |
| | $ | 8.68 |
| | $ | 8.23 |
| | $ | 7.80 |
| | $ | 8.02 |
| $ | 8.68 |
| | $ | 8.23 |
| | $ | 7.80 |
| | $ | 8.02 |
| | $ | 7.82 |
| | $ | 7.60 |
| | $ | 7.48 |
| | $ | 7.09 |
|
| Marketing costs per gross subscriber line additions | $ | 281.68 |
| | $ | 330.44 |
| | $ | 299.65 |
| | $ | 306.19 |
| | $ | 322.88 |
| | $ | 336.43 |
| | $ | 299.26 |
| | $ | 346.65 |
| $ | 322.88 |
| | $ | 336.43 |
| | $ | 299.26 |
| | $ | 346.65 |
| | $ | 349.11 |
| | $ | 375.32 |
| | $ | 338.54 |
| | $ | 331.41 |
|
| Employees at end of period | 1,126 |
| | 1,059 |
| | 1,035 |
| | 1,008 |
| | 1,004 |
| | 988 |
| | 971 |
| | 983 |
| 1,004 |
| | 988 |
| | 971 |
| | 983 |
| | 966 |
| | 946 |
| | 933 |
| | 1,243 |
|
| |
| (1) | Excludes depreciation and amortization of$4,124, $3,867, $3,864, and $3,969 for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and $3,930, $3,929, $3,722, and $3,534 for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and $3,452, $3,510, $3,522, and $4,408 for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2013, respectively. |
.
3336 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
Overview
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (dollars in thousands) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 119,843 |
| | $ | 146,786 |
| | $ | 194,212 |
| $ | 88,243 |
| | $ | 119,843 |
| | $ | 146,786 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) | | (4,686 | ) | (120,985 | ) | | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) | | (143,762 | ) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 21,891 |
| | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) |
For the three years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 we generated income from operations. We expect to continue to balance efforts to grow our customer base while consistently achieving profitability. To grow our customer base, we continue to make investments in marketing and application development as we seek to launch new services, network quality and expansion, and customer care. Although we believe we will maintain consistent profitability in the future, we ultimately may not be successful and we may not achieve consistent profitability. We believe that cash flow from operations and cash on hand will fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.
December 2010 Financing
On December 14, 2010, we entered into the 2010 Credit Facility consistingAcquisition of a $200,000 senior secured term loan. The co-borrowers under the 2010 Credit Facility were us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2010 Credit Facility were guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and were secured by substantially allVocalocity
Vocalocity was acquired for $130,000 adjusted for $2,869 of excess cash as of the assets of each borrowerclosing date and eachthe increase in value of the guarantors. An affiliate7,983 shares of Vonage common stock from the chairmansigning date to the closing date of our board of directors and one of our principal stockholders$1,298, resulting in a total acquisition cost was a lender under$134,167. We financed the 2010 Credit Facility.
Use of Proceeds
We used the net proceeds of the 2010 Credit Facility of $194,000 ($200,000 principal amount less original discount of $6,000), plus $102,090transaction through $32,981 of cash on hand, to (i) exerciseand $75,000 from our existing right to retire debt under our prior senior secured first lien credit facility for 100% of the contractual make-whole price, (ii) retire debt under our prior senior secured second lien credit facility at a more than 25% discount to the contractual make-whole price, and (iii) cause the conversion of all then outstanding third lien convertible notes into 8,276 shares of our common stock. We also incurred $11,444 of fees in connection with the 2010 Credit Facility and repayment of the prior financing.
Repayments
In 2011, we repaid the entire $200,000 under the 2010 Credit Facility, with $20,000 designated to cover our 2011 mandatory amortization, $50,000 designated to cover our 2011 annual excess cash flow mandatory repayment, if any, and $130,000 designated to cover the outstanding principal balance under the 2010 Credit Facility at the time of the 2011 Credit Facility financing.
July 2011 Financing
On July 29, 2011, we entered into the 2011 Credit Facility consisting of an $85,000 senior secured term loan and a $35,000 revolving credit facility. The co-borrowersacquisition of Vocalocity immediately positions Vonage as a leader in the SMB hosted VoIP market. SMB and SOHO services will be offered under the 2011 Credit Facility were us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2011 Credit Facility were guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and were secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors.
Use of Proceeds
We used $100,000 of the net available proceeds of the 2011 Credit Facility, plus $31,000 of cash on hand, to retire all of the debt
under our 2010 Credit Facility, including a $1,000 prepayment fee to holders of the 2010 Credit Facility.
Repayments
In 2012 and 2011, we made mandatory repayment of $28,333 and $14,166, respectively, under the senior secured term loan. In addition, we repaid the $15,000 outstanding under the revolving credit facility in 2011.
As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants, including financial covenants, for the 2011 Credit Facility.
The 2011 Credit Facility contains customary events of default that may permit acceleration of the debt. During the continuance of a payment default, interest will accrue at a default interest rate of 2% above the interest rate which would otherwise be applicable, in the case of loans, and at a rate equal to the rate applicable to base rate loans plus 2%, in the case of all other amounts.Business Solutions brand.
February 2013 Financing
On February 11, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 20132011 Credit Facility.Agreement (as further amended by Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Facility, the "2013 Credit Facility"). The 2013 Credit Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. The co-borrowers under the 2013 Credit Facility are us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors. On July 26, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Agreement, which amends our financial covenant related to our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio by increasing the amount of restricted payments excluded from such calculation from $50,000 to $80,000.
Use of Proceeds
We used $42,500 of the net available proceeds of the 2013 Credit Facility to retire all of the debt under our 2011 Credit Facility. Remaining net proceeds of $27,500 from the senior secured term loan and the undrawn revolving credit facility under the 2013 Credit Facility will be used for general corporate purposes. We used $75,000 from the 2013 revolving credit facility in connection with the acquisition of Vocalocity on November 15, 2013. We also incurred $2,009 of fees in connection with the 2013 Credit Facility, which is amortized, along with the unamortized fees of $670 in connection with the 2011 Credit Facility, to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.
2013 Credit Facility Terms
The following description summarizes the material terms of the 2013 Credit Facility:
The loans under the 2013 Credit Facility mature in February 2016. Principal amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility are repayable in quarterly installments of $5,833 per quarter for the senior secured term loan. The unused portion of our revolving credit facility incurs a 0.45% commitment fee.
Outstanding amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility, at our option, will bear interest at:
| |
| > | LIBOR (applicable to one-, two-, three- or six-month periods) plus an applicable margin equal to 3.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 3.375% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 3.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last day of each relevant interest period or, if the interest period is longer than three months, each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or |
34 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
period, or
| |
> | the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and (c) the LIBOR rate applicable to one month interest periods plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin equal to 2.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 2.275% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 2.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December and the maturity date of the 2013 Credit Facility. |
The 2013 Credit Facility provides greater flexibility to us in funding acquisitions and restricted payments, such as stock buybacks, than the 2011 Credit Facility.
We may prepay the 2013 Credit Facility at our option at any time without premium or penalty. The 2013 Credit Facility is subject to mandatory prepayments in amounts equal to:
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds from any non-ordinary course sale or other disposition of our property and assets for consideration in excess of a certain amount subject to customary reinvestment provisions and certain other exceptions and |
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds received in connection with other non-ordinary course transactions, including insurance proceeds not otherwise applied to the relevant insurance loss. |
Subject to certain restrictions and exceptions, the 2013 Credit Facility permits us to obtain one or more incremental term loans and/or revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $60,000 plus an amount equal to repayments of the senior secured term loan upon providing documentation reasonably satisfactory to the administrative agent, without the consent of the existing lenders under
37 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
the 2013 Credit Facility. The 2013 Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants of the borrowers. In addition, the 2013 Credit Facility contains customary negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the ability of us and our subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions, make investments, and pay dividends and other distributions. We must also comply with the following financial covenants:
| |
| > | a consolidated leverage ratio of no greater than 2.00 to 1.00; |
| |
> | a consolidated fixed coverage charge ratio of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 subject to adjustment to exclude up to $50,000 in specified restricted payments; |
| |
> | minimum cash of $25,000 including the unused portion of the revolving credit facility or $35,000 in the event of certain specified corporate actions; and |
| |
| > | maximum capital expenditures not to exceed $55,000 during any fiscal year, provided that the unused amount of any permitted capital expenditures in any fiscal year may be carried forward to the next following fiscal year. In addition, annual excess cash flow up to $8,000 increases permitted capital expenditures. |
The 2013 Credit Facility contains customary events of default that may permit acceleration of the debt. During the continuance of a payment default, interest will accrue at a default interest rate of 2% above the interest rate which would otherwise be applicable, in the case of loans, and at a rate equal to the rate applicable to base rate loans plus 2%, in the case of all other amounts.
State and Local Sales Taxes
We also have contingent liabilities for state and local sales taxes. As of December 31, 20122013, we had a reserve of $1,5144,630. If our
ultimate liability exceeds this amount, it could affect our liquidity unfavorably. However, we do not believe it would significantly impair our liquidity.
Capital expenditures
For 20122013, capital expenditures were primarily for the implementation of software solutions and purchase of network equipment as we continue to expand our network. Our capital expenditures for the year ended 20122013 were $26,75022,180, of which $12,98712,291 was for software acquisition and development. The majority of these expenditures are comprised of investments in information technology and systems infrastructure, including an electronic data warehouse, online customer service, and customer management platforms, and the Amdocs billing and order management system. As previously disclosed, we experienced delays and incremental costs during the course of the development and implementation of the Amdocs billing and ordering system and the transition of customers to the system. We conducted discussions with Amdocs to resolve the issues associated with the billing and ordering system. Based on these discussions, and after our consideration of the progress made improving our overall IT infrastructure, the incremental time and costs to develop and implement the Amdocs system, as well as the expected reduction in capital expenditures, in June 2012 we and Amdocs determined that terminating the program was in the best interest of both parties. On July 30, 2012, we entered into a settlement agreement with Amdocs terminating the related license agreement. As a result, we determined that a write-off of our investment in the system of $25,262, net of settlement amounts to the Company, was required in the second quarter of 2012. This charge is recorded as loss from abandonment of software assets in the statement of operations.platforms. For 20132014, we believe our capital and software expenditures will be approximately $30,000 to $35,000.$30,000.
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities decreased to $119,84388,243 during the year ended December 31, 20122013 compared to $146,786119,843 for the year ended December 31, 20112012, primarily due to planned investments in our growth initiatives, lower revenues and changes in working capital.
Changes in working capital requirements include changes in accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid and other assets, other assets,
accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, and deferred revenue and costs. Cash used for working capital increased by $2,663 during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to the timing of payments.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased to $119,843 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $146,786 for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to planned investments in our growth initiatives, lower revenues and changes in working capital.
Changes in working capital requirements include changes in accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid and other assets, other assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, and deferred revenue and costs. Cash used for working capital increased by $5,704 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to the timing of payments.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased to $146,786$5,704 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $194,212 for the year ended December 31, 2010 , primarily due to changes in working capital requirements and higher marketing expenditures partially offset by lower interest expense as a result of our debt refinancings in December 2010 and July 2011.
Changes in working capital requirements include changes in accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid and other assets, other assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, and deferred revenue and costs. Cash provided by working capital decreased by $69,137 during the year ended December 31, 20112012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, primarily due to the timing of payments.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for 20122013 of $25,472120,985 was attributable to the acquisition of Vocalocity of $100,057, capital expenditures of $13,7639,889, and software acquisition and development of $12,98712,291, offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $1,2781,252 due primarily to the return of part of the security deposit on our leased office property in Holmdel, New Jersey.
Cash used in investing activities for 2012 of $25,472 was attributable to capital expenditures of $13,763 and software acquisition and development of $12,987, offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $1,278 due primarily to the return of part of the security deposit on our leased office property in Holmdel, New Jersey.
Cash used in investing activities for 2011 of $37,604 was attributable to capital expenditures of $12,636, software acquisition and development of $22,292, and purchase of intangible assets of $3,725, offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $1,049 due primarily to the return of part of the security deposit on our leased office property in Holmdel, New Jersey.
35 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
Cash used in investing activities for 2010 of $4,686 was attributable to capital expenditures of $17,674 and development of software assets of $22,712, partially offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $35,700 due primarily to the reduction of $32,830 of reserves held by our credit card processors as a result of improvements in credit quality and the elimination of the concentration account under our prior credit facilities of $3,277 as a result of our new Credit Facility.
Financing Activities
Cash used inprovided by financing activities for 20122013 of $56,25721,891 was primarily attributable to $28,33375,000 borrowed under the 2013 revolving credit facility and $27,500 in proceeds from our 2013 Credit Facility, and $4,091 in net proceeds received from the exercise and cancellation of stock options partially offset by $23,334 in 2013 Credit Facility principal payments, $3,471 in capital lease and other liability payments, $56,294 in common stock repurchases, and $2,056 in 2013 Credit Facility debt related costs.
Cash used in financing activities for 2012 of $56,257 was primarily attributable to $28,333 in 2011 Credit Facility principal payments, $2,104$2,104 in capital lease payments, and $27,545$27,545 in common stock repurchases, offset by $1,725$1,725 in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.
Cash used in financing activities for 2011 of $130,138 was primarily attributable to $200,000 in 2010 Credit Facility and $29,166 in
2011 Credit Facility and revolving credit facility principal payments, respectively, $1,783 in capital lease payments, and $2,697 in 2011 Credit Facility debt related cost payments, offset by $100,000 in proceeds received from the issuance of the 2011 Credit Facility and $4,562 in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and a common stock warrant.
Cash used in financing activities for 2010 of $143,762 was attributable to $128,165 in prior senior secured first lien credit facility principal payments, $104,349 in prior senior secured second lien credit facility principal payments, including $32,320 representing paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest payments, payments of $99,938 to extinguish our prior senior secured first lien credit facility, our prior senior secured second lien credit facility and our prior third lien convertible notes, and $1,500 in capital lease payments partially offset by proceeds of the 2010 Credit Facility of $200,000 offset by note discount of $6,000 and debt related costs of $5,430, and proceeds of $1,620 from stock options exercised.
38 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
|
|
| CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS |
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 20122013, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
| | | Payments Due by Period | | Payments Due by Period | |
| (dollars in thousands) | Total |
| | Less than 1 year |
| | 2-3 years |
| | 4-5 years |
| | After 5 years |
| Total |
| | Less than 1 year |
| | 2-3 years |
| | 4-5 years |
| | After 5 years |
|
| | (unaudited) | (unaudited) |
| Contractual Obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2011 Credit Facility | $ | 42,500 |
| | $ | 28,333 |
| | $ | 14,167 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Interest related to 2011 Credit Facility | 1,591 |
| | 1,303 |
| | 288 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| 2013 Credit Facility | | $ | 46,666 |
| | $ | 23,333 |
| | $ | 23,333 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| 2013 Revolving Credit Facility | | $ | 75,000 |
| | — |
| | 75,000 |
| | | | |
| Interest related to 2013 Credit Facility | | 1,760 |
| | 1,272 |
| | 488 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest related to 2013 Revolving Credit Facility | | 5,328 |
| | 2,519 |
| | 2,809 |
| | | | |
| Capital lease obligations | 20,726 |
| | 4,284 |
| | 8,826 |
| | 7,616 |
| | — |
| 16,442 |
| | 4,369 |
| | 9,002 |
| | 3,071 |
| | — |
|
| Operating lease obligations | 9,987 |
| | 5,455 |
| | 4,532 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 7,548 |
| | 5,854 |
| | 1,694 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchase obligations | 63,590 |
| | 49,810 |
| | 12,713 |
| | 1,067 |
| | — |
| 228,667 |
| | 95,129 |
| | 133,271 |
| | 267 |
| | — |
|
| Other obligations | 2,750 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1,750 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1,628 |
| | — |
| | 1,628 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 141,144 |
| | $ | 90,185 |
| | $ | 42,276 |
| | $ | 8,683 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 383,039 |
| | $ | 132,476 |
| | $ | 247,225 |
| | $ | 3,338 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Other Commercial Commitments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Standby letters of credit | $ | 5,558 |
| | $ | 5,558 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 4,306 |
| | $ | 4,306 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total contractual obligations and other commercial commitments | $ | 146,702 |
| | $ | 95,743 |
| | $ | 42,276 |
| | $ | 8,683 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 387,345 |
| | $ | 136,782 |
| | $ | 247,225 |
| | $ | 3,338 |
| | $ | — |
|
Credit Facility. On July 29, 2011, we entered into the 2011 Credit Facility which consists of an $85,000 senior secured term loan and a $35,000 revolving credit facility. On February 11, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2011 Credit Agreement (the "2013 Credit Facility"). The 2013 Credit Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. See Note 6 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. On July 26, 2013, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Agreement, which amends our financial covenant related to our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio by increasing the amount of restricted payments excluded from such calculation from $50,000 to $80,000.
Capital lease obligations. At December 31, 20122013, we had capital lease obligations of $20,72616,442 related to our corporate headquarters in Holmdel, New Jersey.
Operating lease obligations. At December 31, 2012,2013, we had future commitments for operating leases for co-location facilities mainly in the United States that accommodate a portion of our network equipment, for kiosks leased in various locations throughout the United States, for office space leased for our London, United Kingdom office,
for office space leased in Atlanta, Georgia for product development,our Vocalocity office, for office space leased in Tel Aviv, Israel for application development, and for apartment space leased in New Jersey for certain executives.
Purchase obligations. The purchase obligations reflected above are primarily commitments to vendors who will provide voice termination services, provide voicemail to text transcription services, provide local inbound services, process our credit card billings, provide E-911 services to our customers, assist us with local number portability, license patents to us, sell us communication devices, sell us data center equipment, lease us collocation facilities, and provide carrier operation and telephone related services, provide marketing services, and provide in-store assisted sales labor.energy supply. In certain cases, we may terminate these arrangements early upon payment of specified fees. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. We also purchase products and services as needed with no firm commitment. For this reason, the amounts presented do not provide a reliable indicator of our expected future cash outflows or changes in our expected cash position. See also Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.
3639 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES |
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. The following describes our critical accounting policies and estimates:
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including the following:
| |
| > | the useful lives of property and equipment, software costs, and intangible assets; |
| |
| > | assumptions used for the purpose of determining share-based compensation and the fair value of our prior stock warrant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model (“Model”), and various other assumptions that we believed to be reasonable; the key inputs for this Model are our stock price at valuation date, exercise price, the dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, life in years, and historical volatility of our common stock; |
| |
| > | assumptions used in determining the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets; |
| |
> | assumptions used to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion option within our prior third lien convertible notes using the Monte Carlo simulation model; the key inputs are maturity date, risk-free interest rate, our stock price at valuation date, and historical volatility of our common stock; and |
| |
> | assumptions used to determine the fair value of the embedded make-whole premium feature within our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility. |
We base our estimates on historical experience, available market information, appropriate valuation methodologies, and on various other assumptions that we believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
The point in time at which revenues are recognized is determined in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition.
At the time a customer signs up for our telephony services, there are the following deliverables:
| |
| > | Providing equipment, if any, to the customer that enables our telephony services and |
| |
> | Providing telephony services. |
The equipment is provided free of charge to our customers and in most instances there are no fees collected at sign-up. We record the fees collected for shipping the equipment to the customer, if any, as shipping and handling revenue at the time of shipment.
A further description of our revenues is as follows:
Substantially all of our operating revenues are telephony services revenues, which are derived primarily from monthly
subscription fees that customers are charged under our service plans. We also derive telephony services revenues from per minute fees for international calls if not covered under a plan, including applications for mobile devices and other stand-alone products, and for any calling minutes in excess of a customer’s monthly plan limits. Monthly subscription fees are automatically charged to customers’ credit cards, debit cards or electronic check payments, or ECP, in advance and are recognized over the following month when services are provided. Revenues generated from international calls and from customers exceeding allocated call minutes under limited minute plans are recognized as services are provided, that is, as minutes are used, and are billed to a customer’s credit cards, debit cards or ECP in arrears.
As a result of our multiple billing cycles each month, we estimate the amount of revenues earned from international calls and from customers exceeding allocated call minutes under limited minute plans but not billed from the end of each billing cycle to the end of each reporting period. These estimates are based primarily upon historical minutes and have been consistent with our actual results.
We also provide rebates to customers who purchase their customer equipment from retailers and satisfy minimum service period requirements. These rebates in excess of activation fees are recorded as a reduction of revenues over the service period based upon the estimated number of customers that will ultimately earn and claim the rebates.
Customer equipment and shipping revenues include sales to our retailers, who subsequently resell this customer equipment to customers. Revenues were reduced for payments to retailers and rebates to customers, who purchased their customer equipment through these retailers, to the extent of customer equipment and shipping revenues. In addition, customer equipment and shipping revenues include revenues from the sale of VoIP telephones in order to access our small and medium business services on a net basis rather than a gross basis as we act as an agent, rather than a principal.
Inventory
Inventory consists of the cost of customer equipment and is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the average cost method. We provide an inventory allowance for customer equipment that has been returned by customers but may not be able to be reissued to new customers or returned to the manufacturer for credit.
Goodwill and Purchased-Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in the acquisition of a business is accounted for based upon the excess fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in the business combination. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis on October 1st and, when specific circumstances dictate, between annual tests. When impaired, the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step would need to be conducted; otherwise, no further steps are necessary as no potential impairment exists. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Any excess of the reporting unit goodwill carrying value over the respective implied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Purchased-intangible assets are accounted for based upon the fair value of assets received. Purchased-intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the periods of benefit, ranging from two to ten years. We perform a review of purchased-intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than we had originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, we assess the recoverability of purchased-intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If the useful life of the asset is shorter than originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of amortization and amortize the remaining carrying value over the new shorter useful life. There was no impairment of purchased-intangible assets identified for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities at enacted income tax rates for the temporary differences between the financial
40 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
reporting bases and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. Any effects of changes in income tax rates or tax laws are included in the provision for income taxes in the period of enactment. Our net deferred tax assets primarily consist of net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”). We are required to record a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets if we conclude that it is more likely than not that taxable income generated in the future will be insufficient to utilize the future income tax benefit from our net deferred tax assets (namely, the NOLs) prior to expiration. We periodically review this conclusion, which requires significant management judgment. If we are able to conclude in a future period that a future income tax benefit from our net deferred tax assets has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized, we are required in that period to reduce the related valuation allowance with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense. This will result in a non-cash benefit to our net income in the period of the determination. In the future, if available evidence changes our conclusion that it is more likely than not that we will utilize our net deferred tax assets prior to their expiration, we will make an adjustment to the related valuation allowance and income tax expense at that time. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we released $325,601$325,601 of valuation allowance (see Note 5. Income Taxes). In subsequent periods, we would expect to recognize income tax expense equal to our pre-tax income multiplied by our effective income tax rate, an expense that was not recognized prior to the reduction of the valuation allowance.
37 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
As of December 31, 20122013, we had NOLs for United States federal and state tax purposes, including the NOLs of Vocalocity as of the date of acquisition, of $744,139715,524 and $290,196251,627, respectively, expiring at various times from years ending 2013 through 20302033. In addition, we had NOLs for Canadian tax purposes of $25,47614,171 expiring through 20282027. We also had NOLs for United Kingdom tax purposes of $37,76541,423 with no expiration date.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, if we undergo an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in our equity ownership over a three-year period), our ability to use our pre-change of control NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes against our post-change income may be limited. The Section 382 limitation is applied annually so as to limit the use of our
pre-change NOLs to an amount that generally equals the value of our stock immediately before the ownership change multiplied by a designated federal long-term tax-exempt rate. At December 31, 20122013, there were no limitations on the use of our NOLs.NOLs except for the NOLs of Vocalocity as of the date of acquisition.
Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this pronouncement, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, reduced as appropriate based on estimated forfeitures, and is recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period of the stock award using the accelerated method.
|
|
| OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS |
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Foreign Exchange Risk
We sell our products and services in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Changes in currency exchange rates affect the valuation in our financial statements of the assets and liabilities of these operations. We also have a portion of our sales denominated in Euros, the Canadian Dollar, and the British Pound, which are also affected by changes in currency exchange rates. Our financial results could be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, although foreign exchange risks have not been material to our financial position or results of operations to date.
We prepared a sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of hypothetical changes foreign currency exchange rates have on our results of operations. The foreign currency rate analysis assumed a uniform movement in currencies by 10% relative to the U.S. Dollar on our results. Based upon the results of this analysis, a 10% change in currency rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in our earnings for the year ended December 31, 20122013 of approximately $900.$500.
Interest Rate and Debt Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt.
On July 29, 2011, we entered into the 2011Our 2013 Credit Facility.Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. We
are exposed to
interest rate risk since amounts payable under the 2011
2013 Credit Facility, at our option, bear interest at:
| |
| > | LIBOR (applicable to one-, two-, three- or six-month periods) plus an applicable margin equal to 3.25%3.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 3.5%3.375% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 3.75%3.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last day of each relevant interest period or, if the interest period is longer than three months, each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or |
| |
> | the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and (c) the LIBOR rate applicable to one month interest periods plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin equal to 2.25%2.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 2.5%2.275% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 2.75%2.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December and the maturity date of the 2013 Credit Facility. |
As of December 31, 2012, if the interest rate on our variable rate debt changed by 1% on our 2011 Credit Facility, our annual debt service payment would change by approximately $400. As of December 31, 20122013, if the interest rate on our variable rate debt changed by 1% on our 2013 Credit Facility, , our annual debt service payment would change by approximately $700.$500. As of December 31, 2013, if the interest rate on our variable rate debt changed
41 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
by 1% on our 2013 Revolving Credit Facility, our annual debt service payment would change by approximately $800.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required by this Item is contained on pages F-1 through F-32 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
38 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
None.N/A.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20122013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20122013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
February 13, 20132014
To the Stockholders of Vonage Holdings Corp.:
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
| |
| > | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; |
| |
| > | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| |
| > | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122013. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.Framework (1992).
We acquired Vocalocity in November 2013. Our management has excluded the operations of this business from our evaluation of, and conclusion on, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. This business represents 2% and 1% of our total assets and revenues, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. Our management plans to fully integrate the operations of this business into its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in 2014.
Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 20122013, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
42 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page F-3.
|
| | |
| /s/ MARC LEFAR | | /s/ BARRY ROWANDAVID PEARSON |
Marc Lefar Director, Chief Executive Officer | | Barry Rowan
Executive Vice President, David T. Pearson
Chief Financial Officer Chief Administrativeand Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Duly Authorized Officer) |
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on page F-3.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to controls during the quarter ended December 31, 20122013 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
39 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
ITEM 9B. Other Information
Amendment to 2011 Credit Facility
On February 11, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2011 Credit Agreement (the "2013 Credit Facility"). The 2013 Credit Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. The co-borrowers under the 2013 Credit Facility are us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors.
Use of Proceeds
We used $42,500 of the net available proceeds of the 2013 Credit Facility to retire all of the debt under our 2011 Credit Facility. Remaining proceeds from the senior secured term loan and the undrawn revolving credit facility under the 2013 Credit Facility will be used for general corporate purposes.
2013 Credit Facility Terms
The following description summarizes the material terms of the 2013 Credit Facility:
The loans under the 2013 Credit Facility mature in February 2016. Principal amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility are repayable in quarterly installments of $5,833 per quarter for the senior secured term loan. The unused portion of our revolving credit facility incurs a 0.45% commitment fee.
Outstanding amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility, at our option, will bear interest at:
| |
> | LIBOR (applicable to one-, two-, three- or six-month periods) plus an applicable margin equal to 3.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 3.375% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 3.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last day of each relevant interest period or, if the interest period is longer |
than three months, each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or
| |
>
| the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and (c) the LIBOR rate applicable to one month interest periods plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin equal to 2.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 2.275% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 2.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December and the maturity date of the 2013 Credit Facility. |
The 2013 Credit Facility provides greater flexibility to us in funding acquisitions and restricted payments, such as stock buybacks, than the 2011 Credit Facility.
We may prepay the 2013 Credit Facility at our option at any time without premium or penalty. The 2013 Credit Facility is subject to mandatory prepayments in amounts equal to:
| |
> | 100% of the net cash proceeds from any non-ordinary course sale or other disposition of our property and assets for consideration in excess of a certain amount subject to customary reinvestment provisions and certain other exceptions and |
| |
> | 100% of the net cash proceeds received in connection with other non-ordinary course transactions, including insurance proceeds not otherwise applied to the relevant insurance loss. |
Subject to certain restrictions and exceptions, the 2013 Credit Facility permits us to obtain one or more incremental term loans and/or revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $60,000 plus an amount equal to repayments of the senior secured term loan upon providing documentation reasonably satisfactory to the administrative agent, without the consent of the existing lenders under the 2013 Credit Facility. The 2013 Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants of the borrowers. In addition, the 2013 Credit Facility contains customary negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the ability of us and our subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions, make investments, and pay dividends and other distributions. We must also comply with the following financial covenants:
| |
> | a consolidated leverage ratio of no greater than 2.00 to 1.00; |
| |
>
| a consolidated fixed coverage charge ratio of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 subject to adjustment to exclude up to $50,000 in specified restricted payments; |
| |
>
| minimum cash of $25,000 including the unused portion of the revolving credit facility or $35,000 in the event of certain specified corporate actions; and |
| |
> | maximum capital expenditures not to exceed $55,000 during any fiscal year, provided that the unused amount of any permitted capital expenditures in any fiscal year may be carried forward to the next following fiscal year. In addition, annual excess cash flow up to $8,000 increases permitted capital expenditures. |
The 2013 Credit Facility contains customary events of default that may permit acceleration of the debt. During the continuance of a payment default, interest will accrue at a default interest rate of 2% above the interest rate which would otherwise be applicable, in the case of loans, and at a rate equal to the rate applicable to base rate loans plus 2%, in the case of all other amounts.
None.
4043 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The discussion under the headings “Proposal No. 1 – Election“Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Director Nomination Process”, “Corporate Governance – Board Committees – Audit Committee”, and “Executive Officers of Vonage” in our Proxy Statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
We have adopted a Vonage Code of Conduct applicable to all our officers and employees and a Vonage Finance Code of Ethics applicable to our chief financial officer and other employees in our
finance organization. The Vonage Code of Conduct and Vonage Finance Code of Ethics are posted in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.vonage.com. We will provide you with print copies of our codes free of charge on written request to Vonage Investor Relations, 23 Main Street, Holmdel NJ, 07733. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of our codes that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or any person performing in similar functions, on our website promptly following the date of such amendment or waiver.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The discussion under the headings “Compensation”, “Director Compensation”, “Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”, and “Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
The “Compensation Committee Report” contained in our Proxy Statement shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with
the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate such information by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The discussion under the headings “Stock Ownership Information” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy
Statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The discussion under the headings “Proposal No. 1 – Election“Election of Directors – Transactions with Related Persons”, and “Corporate Governance – Board Determination of Independence” in our Proxy Statement for the
Statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The discussion under the heading “Proposal No. 2 – Ratification“Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our
Proxy Statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
4144 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
PART IV
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vonage Holdings Corp.
Holmdel, New Jersey 07733
The audits referred to in our report dated February 13, 20132014 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Vonage Holdings Corp., which is contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K also included the audit of the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Woodbridge, New Jersey
February 13, 20132014
4245 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
(1) Financial Statements. The index to our financial statements is found on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
(2) Financial Statement Schedule. Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is as follows:
| | | Balance at Beginning of Period |
| | Additions | | | Less Deductions |
| | Balance at End of Period |
| Balance at Beginning of Period |
| Additions | | Less Deductions |
| Other | | Balance at End of Period |
|
| Revenue |
| | Expense |
| | | Revenue |
| Expense |
| |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2013 | | $ | 753 |
| $ | (256 | ) | $ | 186 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 683 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 591 |
| | $ | (764 | ) | | $ | 926 |
| | | $ | — |
| | $ | 753 |
| 591 |
| (764 | ) | 926 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 753 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2011 | 588 |
| | (4 | ) | | 7 |
| | | — |
| | 591 |
| 588 |
| (4 | ) | 7 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 591 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2010 | 1,432 |
| | (711 | ) | | — |
| | | (133 | ) | | 588 |
| |
| Inventory Obsolescence | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2013 | | $ | 268 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 663 |
| | $ | (702 | ) | $ | — |
| | $ | 229 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 269 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 527 |
| | | $ | (528 | ) | | $ | 268 |
| 269 |
| — |
| 527 |
| | (528 | ) | — |
| | 268 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2011 | 763 |
| | — |
| | 773 |
| | | (1,267 | ) | | 269 |
| 763 |
| — |
| 773 |
| | (1,267 | ) | — |
| | 269 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2010 | 432 |
| | — |
| | 2,213 |
| | | (1,882 | ) | | 763 |
| |
| Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2013 | | $ | 12,590 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,695 |
| (1) | $ | — |
| $ | 2,637 |
| (2 | ) | 16,922 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 17,683 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (5,093 | ) | (1) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,590 |
| 17,683 |
| — |
| (5,093 | ) | (1) | — |
| — |
| | 12,590 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2011 | 415,903 |
| | — |
| | (398,220 | ) | (1) | | — |
| | 17,683 |
| 415,903 |
| — |
| (398,220 | ) | (1) | — |
| — |
| | 17,683 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2010 | 385,941 |
| | — |
| | 29,962 |
| (1) | | — |
| | 415,903 |
| |
| |
| (1) | Amounts charged (credited) to expense represent change in valuation allowance. |
| |
| (2) | Represents estimated valuation allowance on Vocalocity's deferred tax assets at date of acquisition. |
(3) Exhibits.
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
| 2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 9, 2013, by and among Vonage, Vista Merger Corp., Vocalocity and the Representative (15). |
| 3.1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vonage Holdings Corp.(4) |
| 3.2 | | Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Vonage Holdings Corp.(9) |
| 4.1 | | Form of Certificate of Vonage Holdings Corp. Common Stock(3) |
| 4.2 | | Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated as of June 7, 2012, by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of Designation of the Company's Series A Participating Preferred Stock and as Exhibit B the forms of Right Certificate and of Election to Purchase (19)(20) |
| 10.1 | | 2001 Stock Incentive Plan of Vonage Holdings Corp.(1)* |
| 10.2 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan(1)* |
| 10.3 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Outside Directors under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan(1)* |
| 10.4 | | Amended and Restated Vonage HoldingHoldings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(13)Plan (Amended and Restated through June 6, 2013)(13)* |
| 10.5 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(6)* |
| 10.6 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(15)Plan(16)* |
| 10.7 | | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(6)* |
| 10.8 | | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Executive Directors under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan (10)* |
| 10.9 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Executive Directors (Quarterly Grants) under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan (10)* |
| 10.10. | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Executive Directors (Sign-on Grant) under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan (10)* |
| 10.11 | | Vonage Holdings Corp. 401(k) Retirement Plan(1)* |
| 10.12 | | Lease Agreement, dated March 24, 2005, between 23 Main Street Holmdel Associates LLC and Vonage USA Inc.(1) |
| 10.13 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 5, 2009 between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Marc P. Lefar(13)Lefar(14)* |
| 10.14 | | Indemnification Agreement dated as of July 29, 2008 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Marc. P. Lefar(9)* |
| 10.15 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Marc P. Lefar under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(9)* |
4346 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
| | |
| 10.16 | | Employment Agreement dated as of February 24, 2010 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Barry Rowan(15)Rowan(16)* |
| | |
| 10.17 | | Indemnification Agreement dated as of May 6, 2010 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Barry Rowan(15)Rowan(16)* |
| | |
| 10.18 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated February 8, 2006, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Jeffrey A. Citron(1)* |
| | |
| 10.19 | | Separation Agreement and General Release dated as of July 29, 2008 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Jeffrey A. Citron(9)* |
| | |
| 10.20. | | Amended and Restated Non-Compete Agreement dated as of October 17, 2008 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Jeffrey A. Citron(11) |
| | |
| 10.21 | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Jeffrey A. Citron under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(9)* |
| | |
| 10.22 | | Letter Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Graham McGonigal(18)McGonigal(19)* |
| | |
| 10.23 | | LetterEmployment Agreement dated February 9, 2009,as of April 25, 2013 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Nicholas P. Lazzaro(12)David T. Pearson (25)* |
| | |
| 10.24 | | Amendment to Letter Agreement dated December 30, 2010,as of October 9, 2013 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Nicholas P. Lazzaro(16)Wain Kellum (27)* |
| | | |
| 10.25 | | Second Amendment to LetterEmployment Agreement dated April 17, 2012,as of December 2, 2013 by and between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Nicholas P. Lazzaro(19)Joseph Redling (27)* |
| | |
| 10.26 | | Letter Agreement, dated March 24, 2009, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kimberly O’Loughlin(12)* |
| | |
| 10.27 | | Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated December 25, 2010, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kimberly O’Loughlin(16)O’Loughlin(17)* |
| | |
| 10.28 | | Letter Agreement, dated November 19, 2008, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Michael A. Tempora(12)* |
| | |
| 10.29 | | Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated December 23, 2010, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Michael A. Tempora(16)Tempora(17)* |
| | |
| 10.30. | | Letter Agreement, dated July 15, 2009, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kurt Rogers(13)Rogers(14)* |
| | |
| 10.31 | | Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated December 22, 2010, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kurt Rogers(16)Rogers(17)* |
| | | |
| 10.32 | | Second Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated March 27, 2012, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kurt Rogers(18)Rogers(19)* |
| | | |
| 10.33 | | Amendment to Letter Agreement between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Kurt Rogers (24) |
| |
| 10.34 | | Letter Agreement, dated June 25, 2012, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Barbara Goodstein(21)* |
| |
10.34 | | Non-Executive Director Compensation Program effective January 24, 2012(18)Goodstein(22)* |
| | |
| 10.35 | | Non-Executive Director Compensation Program (27)* |
| |
| 10.36 | | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Vonage Holdings Corp. and its directors and certain officers(7)* |
| | |
10.3610.37 | | Third Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, as amended, dated April 27, 2005, among Vonage Holdings Corp. and the signatories thereto(2) |
| | |
10.3710.38 | | Written Consent of Vonage Holdings Corp. and Certain Stockholders to the amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement dated April 27, 2005, as amended, dated November 13, 2006(5) |
| | |
10.38 | 10.39 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 16, 2005, among Vonage Holdings Corp. and the signatories thereto(1) |
| | |
| |
10.39† | | License and Managed Services Agreement, dated December 23, 2009 between Vonage Network LLC and Amdocs Software Systems Limited and Amdocs, Inc.(14) |
| |
| 10.40† | | First Amending Agreement to License and Managed Services Agreement, dated December 22, 2010 between Vonage Network LLC and Amdocs Software Systems Limited and Amdocs, Inc.(16) |
| | |
10.41† | | Settlement Agreement, dated July, 30, 2012, by and among Vonage Network LLC, Amdocs Software Systems Limited, and Amdocs, Inc. (20)(21) |
| | |
10.4210.41 | | SettlementStock Option Cancellation Agreement, effective October 27, 2007,dated February 19, 2013, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and Sprint Communications Company L.P.(8)Marc P. Lefar (23) |
| | | |
10.4310.42 | | Settlement and Patent License Agreement, dated December 21, 2007, between Vonage Holdings Corp. and AT&T Corp.(8) |
| | |
10.4410.43† | | Settlement Agreement, effective January 1, 2008Route Management Services Addendum (the “Addendum”), by and between Vonage America Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage Holdings Corp., and Nortel NetworksTata Communications (America) Inc. and Nortel Networks Limited(8), effective as of July 1, 2013. (25) |
| | |
10.4510.44 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2011 among Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America Inc., as borrowers, various lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and RBS Citizens, N.A., as Syndication Agent.(17)(18) |
| | |
| 10.45 | | Amendment No. 1, dated February 11, 2013, by and among Vonage America Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp., as borrowers, various lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, under that certain Credit Agreement dated as of July 29, 2011 by and among the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent (24) |
| |
| 10.46 | | Amendment No. 2, dated July 26, 2013, by and among Vonage America Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp., as borrowers, various lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, under that certain Credit Agreement dated as of July 29, 2011 by and among the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent (26) |
| | | |
| 10.47 | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Vocalocity Executives under the Vonage Holdings Corp. 2006 Incentive Plan(27)* |
4447 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
| | | |
| 21.1 |
| | List of Subsidiaries of Vonage Holdings Corp.(21)(27) |
| | | |
| 23.1 |
| | Consent of BDO USA, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm(21)firm(27) |
| | | |
| 31.1 |
| | Certification of our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(21)2002(27) |
| | | |
| 31.2 |
| | Certification of our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(21)2002(27) |
| | | |
| 32.1 |
| | Certification of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(21)2002(27) |
| |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Vonage Holdings Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-131659) filed on April 7, 2006. |
| |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to Vonage Holdings Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-131659) filed on April 28, 2006. |
| |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 5 to Vonage Holdings Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-131659) filed on May 8, 2006. |
| |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holdings Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 4, 2006. |
| |
| (5) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 14, 2006. |
| |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on April 17, 2007. |
| |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 14, 2007. |
| |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on March 17, 2008. |
| |
| (9) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 4, 2008. |
| |
| (10) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 11, 2008. |
| |
| (11) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 10, 2008. |
| |
| (12) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 6, 2009. |
| |
| (13) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on June 6, 2013. |
| |
| (14) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 6, 2009. |
| |
(14)(15) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Annualthe Current Report on Form 10-K8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed by on February 26, 2010.October 10, 2013. |
Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on March 1, 2010.
| |
(15)(16) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on May 7, 2010. |
| |
(16)(17) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on February 17, 2011.2011 |
| |
(17)(18) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 4, 2011. |
| |
(18)(19) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on May 3, 2012. |
| |
(19)(20) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on August 1,June 8, 2012. |
| |
(20)(21) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 1, 2012. |
| |
(21)(22) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on February 13, 2013. |
| |
| (23) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32887) filed on February 21, 2013. |
| |
| (24) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on May 1, 2013. |
| |
| (25) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on July 31, 2013. |
| |
| (26) | Incorporated by reference to Vonage Holding Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32887) filed on November 6, 2013. |
| |
| † | Portions of this Exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an order or application for confidential treatment pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| |
| * | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
(b) Exhibits Filed Herewith
Refer to (a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedule
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
4548 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Holmdel, State of New Jersey, on February 13, 20132014.
|
| | | | |
| | | VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. |
| | | | | |
| Dated: | February 13, 20132014 | By: | | /S/ BARRY ROWANDAVID PEARSON |
| | | | | Barry RowanDavid Pearson |
| | | | | Executive Vice President, David T. Pearson
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Administrative and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Duly Authorized Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and as of the dates indicated.
4649 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | |
/S/ MARC P. LEFAR | | Director, Chief Executive Officer | | February 13, 20132014 |
| Marc P. Lefar | | (principal executive officer) | | |
| | | |
/S/ BARRY L. ROWANDAVID T. PEARSON | | Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer | | February 13, 20132014 |
Barry L. RowanDavid T. Pearson | | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative
Officer and Treasurer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | | |
| | | |
/S/ JEFFREY A. CITRON | | Director, Chairman | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Jeffrey A. Citron | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ MARGARET M. SMYTH | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Margaret M. Smyth | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ MORTON DAVID | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Morton David | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ STEPHEN FISHER | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Stephen Fisher | | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ MICHAEL A. KRUPKA | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Michael A. Krupka | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ JEFFREY J. MISNERCAROLYN KATZ | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
Jeffrey J. MisnerCarolyn Katz | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ DAVID C. NAGEL | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| David C. Nagel | | | | |
| | |
/S/ JOSEPH M. REDLING
| | Director | | February 13, 2013 |
Joseph M. Redling | | | | |
| | | |
/S/ JOHN J. ROBERTS | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| John J. Roberts | | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ CARL SPARKS | | Director | | February 13, 201312, 2014 |
| Carl Sparks | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
4750 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vonage Holdings Corp.
Holmdel, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vonage Holdings Corp. as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, comprehensive income, (loss), stockholders’ equity (deficit) and redeemable noncontrolling interest and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Vonage Holdings Corp. as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Vonage Holdings Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122013, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 13, 20132014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Woodbridge, New Jersey
February 13, 20132014
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vonage Holdings Corp.
Holmdel, New Jersey
We have audited Vonage Holdings Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122013, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Item 9A. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Vocalocity, Inc., which was acquired on November 15, 2013, and which is included in the consolidated balance sheets of Vonage Holdings Corp. as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and redeemable noncontrolling interest and cash flows for the year then ended. Vocalocity, Inc. constituted 2% of total assets as of December 31, 2013 and 1% of revenues for the year then ended. Management did not assess the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Vocalocity because of the timing of the acquisition which was completed on November 15, 2013. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Vonage Holdings Corp. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Vocalocity Inc.
In our opinion, Vonage Holdings Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Vonage Holdings Corp. as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, comprehensive income, (loss), stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122013 and our report dated February 13, 20132014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Woodbridge, New Jersey
February 13, 20132014
F-3 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | (In thousands, except par value) | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Assets | | | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 97,110 |
| | $ | 58,863 |
| $ | 84,663 |
| | $ | 97,110 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $753 and $591, respectively | 20,416 |
| | 17,862 |
| |
| Inventory, net of allowance of $268 and $269, respectively | 5,470 |
| | 6,715 |
| |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $683 and $753, respectively | | 19,649 |
| | 20,416 |
|
| Inventory, net of allowance of $229 and $268, respectively | | 10,584 |
| | 5,470 |
|
| Deferred customer acquisition costs, current | 5,418 |
| | 4,964 |
| 4,991 |
| | 5,418 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, current | 15,947 |
| | 19,546 |
| 18,361 |
| | 15,947 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 15,487 |
| | 16,820 |
| 16,892 |
| | 15,487 |
|
| Total current assets | 159,848 |
| | 124,770 |
| 155,140 |
| | 159,848 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 60,533 |
| | 67,978 |
| 52,243 |
| | 60,533 |
|
| Goodwill | | 83,627 |
| | — |
|
| Software, net | 19,560 |
| | 45,661 |
| 20,557 |
| | 19,560 |
|
| Deferred customer acquisition costs, non-current | 347 |
| | 721 |
| 193 |
| | 347 |
|
| Debt related costs, net | 772 |
| | 2,007 |
| 1,313 |
| | 772 |
|
| Restricted cash | 5,656 |
| | 6,929 |
| 4,405 |
| | 5,656 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 6,681 |
| | 9,056 |
| 76,850 |
| | 6,681 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, non-current | 290,166 |
| | 306,055 |
| 246,539 |
| | 290,166 |
|
| Other assets | 3,826 |
| | 3,038 |
| 1,882 |
| | 3,826 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 547,389 |
| | $ | 566,215 |
| $ | 642,749 |
| | $ | 547,389 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 74,028 |
| | $ | 66,214 |
| $ | 49,867 |
| | $ | 74,028 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 55,787 |
| | 69,526 |
| 81,127 |
| | 55,787 |
|
| Deferred revenue, current portion | 35,803 |
| | 38,778 |
| 36,899 |
| | 35,803 |
|
| Current maturities of capital lease obligations | 2,471 |
| | 2,104 |
| 2,889 |
| | 2,471 |
|
| Current portion of notes payable | 28,333 |
| | 28,333 |
| 23,333 |
| | 28,333 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 196,422 |
| | 204,955 |
| 194,115 |
| | 196,422 |
|
| Indebtedness under revolving credit facility | | 75,000 |
| | — |
|
| Notes payable, net of current portion | 14,167 |
| | 42,500 |
| 23,333 |
| | 14,167 |
|
| Deferred revenue, net of current portion | 730 |
| | 1,203 |
| 436 |
| | 730 |
|
| Capital lease obligations, net of current maturities | 13,090 |
| | 15,561 |
| 10,201 |
| | 13,090 |
|
| Other liabilities, net of current portion in accrued expenses | 1,565 |
| | 2,429 |
| 1,628 |
| | 1,565 |
|
| Total liabilities | 225,974 |
| | 266,648 |
| 304,713 |
| | 225,974 |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Redeemable noncontrolling interest | | (38 | ) | | — |
|
| Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | |
| Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 596,950 shares authorized at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011; 230,118 and 227,858 shares issued at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively; 215,306 and 225,586 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 230 |
| | 228 |
| |
| Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 596,950 shares authorized at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012; 246,741 and 230,118 shares issued at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively; 212,339 and 215,306 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | | 247 |
| | 230 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,088,186 |
| | 1,074,488 |
| 1,136,289 |
| | 1,088,186 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (726,230 | ) | | (762,857 | ) | (697,941 | ) | | (726,230 | ) |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 14,812 shares at December 31, 2012 and 2,272 shares at December 31, 2011 | (43,343 | ) | | (14,529 | ) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 2,572 |
| | 2,237 |
| |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 34,402 shares at December 31, 2013 and 14,812 shares at December 31, 2012 | | (101,040 | ) | | (43,343 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | 519 |
| | 2,572 |
|
| Total stockholders’ equity | 321,415 |
| | 299,567 |
| 338,074 |
| | 321,415 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 547,389 |
| | $ | 566,215 |
| $ | 642,749 |
| | $ | 547,389 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-4 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSINCOME |
| | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | 885,042 |
| $ | 829,067 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct cost of telephony services (excluding depreciation and amortization of $15,115, $15,824, and $18,725, respectively) | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
| | 243,794 |
| |
| Direct cost of telephony services (excluding depreciation and amortization of $14,892, $15,115, and $15,824, respectively) | | 213,712 |
| | 231,877 |
| | 236,149 |
|
| Direct cost of goods sold | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
| | 55,965 |
| 37,586 |
| | 39,133 |
| | 41,756 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 242,368 |
| | 234,754 |
| | 238,986 |
| 262,302 |
| | 242,368 |
| | 234,754 |
|
| Marketing | 212,540 |
| | 204,263 |
| | 198,170 |
| 227,052 |
| | 212,540 |
| | 204,263 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 33,324 |
| | 37,051 |
| | 53,073 |
| 36,066 |
| | 33,324 |
| | 37,051 |
|
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 25,262 |
| | — |
|
| | 784,504 |
| | 753,973 |
| | 789,988 |
| 776,718 |
| | 784,504 |
| | 753,973 |
|
| Income from operations | 64,610 |
| | 116,350 |
| | 95,054 |
| 52,349 |
| | 64,610 |
| | 116,350 |
|
| Other Income (Expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | 109 |
| | 135 |
| | 519 |
| 307 |
| | 109 |
| | 135 |
|
| Interest expense | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) | | (48,541 | ) | (6,557 | ) | | (5,986 | ) | | (17,118 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded features within notes payable and stock warrant | — |
| | (950 | ) | | (99,338 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (950 | ) |
| Loss on extinguishment of notes | — |
| | (11,806 | ) | | (31,023 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (11,806 | ) |
| Other expense, net | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (18 | ) | (104 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (271 | ) |
| | (5,888 | ) | | (30,010 | ) | | (178,401 | ) | (6,354 | ) | | (5,888 | ) | | (30,010 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit | 58,722 |
| | 86,340 |
| | (83,347 | ) | |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (22,095 | ) | | 322,704 |
| | (318 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | | 45,995 |
| | 58,722 |
| | 86,340 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | (18,194 | ) | | (22,095 | ) | | 322,704 |
|
| Net income | | 27,801 |
| | 36,627 |
| | 409,044 |
|
| Plus: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 488 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage | | $ | 28,289 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage per common share: | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
|
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
| | 209,868 |
| 211,563 |
| | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
|
| Diluted | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
| | 209,868 |
| 220,520 |
| | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-5 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 335 |
| | 872 |
| | 909 |
|
| Total other comprehensive income | 335 |
| | 872 |
| | 909 |
|
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 36,962 |
| | $ | 409,916 |
| | $ | (82,756 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands) | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Net income | $ | 27,801 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
|
| Other (loss) comprehensive income: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (2,058 | ) | | 335 |
| | 872 |
|
| Total other comprehensive (loss) income | (2,058 | ) | | 335 |
| | 872 |
|
| Comprehensive income | 25,743 |
| | 36,962 |
| | 409,916 |
|
| Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest: | | | | | |
| Add: Net loss | (488 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | (493 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Comprehensive income attributable to Vonage | $ | 26,236 |
| | $ | 36,962 |
| | $ | 409,916 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-6 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| | | December 31, | For the years ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands) | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 27,801 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization and impairment charges | 30,949 |
| | 35,776 |
| | 51,928 |
| 31,208 |
| | 30,949 |
| | 35,776 |
|
| Amortization of intangibles | 2,375 |
| | 1,275 |
| | 1,145 |
| 4,858 |
| | 2,375 |
| | 1,275 |
|
| Loss from abandonment of software assets | 25,262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 25,262 |
| | — |
|
| Deferred tax expense (benefit) | 19,488 |
| | (325,601 | ) | | — |
| 16,795 |
| | 19,488 |
| | (325,601 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded features in notes payable and stock warrant | — |
| | 950 |
| | 99,338 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 950 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of notes | — |
| | 11,806 |
| | 31,023 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 11,806 |
|
| Amortization of discount on notes | — |
| | 914 |
| | 4,732 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 914 |
|
| Accrued interest paid in-kind | — |
| | — |
| | 13,232 |
| |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | 926 |
| | (4 | ) | | (711 | ) | (256 | ) | | 926 |
| | (4 | ) |
| Allowance for obsolete inventory | 527 |
| | 773 |
| | 2,213 |
| 663 |
| | 527 |
| | 773 |
|
| Amortization of debt related costs | 1,235 |
| | 1,391 |
| | 1,402 |
| 1,515 |
| | 1,235 |
| | 1,391 |
|
| Share-based expense | 11,975 |
| | 14,279 |
| | 8,255 |
| 17,843 |
| | 11,975 |
| | 14,279 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (3,461 | ) | | (2,663 | ) | | 573 |
| 1,236 |
| | (3,461 | ) | | (2,663 | ) |
| Inventory | 748 |
| | (1,362 | ) | | (568 | ) | (5,835 | ) | | 748 |
| | (1,362 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1,345 |
| | 412 |
| | 21,322 |
| (662 | ) | | 1,345 |
| | 412 |
|
| Deferred customer acquisition costs | (66 | ) | | 1,891 |
| | 15,505 |
| 621 |
| | (66 | ) | | 1,891 |
|
| Other assets | (788 | ) | | 163 |
| | 9,118 |
| 1,970 |
| | (788 | ) | | 163 |
|
| Accounts payable | 7,801 |
| | 29,090 |
| | 25,606 |
| (26,335 | ) | | 7,801 |
| | 29,090 |
|
| Accrued expenses | (10,719 | ) | | (21,216 | ) | | 19,966 |
| 17,869 |
| | (10,719 | ) | | (21,216 | ) |
| Deferred revenue | (3,517 | ) | | (5,167 | ) | | (19,446 | ) | (1,111 | ) | | (3,517 | ) | | (5,167 | ) |
| Other liabilities | (864 | ) | | (4,965 | ) | | (6,756 | ) | 63 |
| | (864 | ) | | (4,965 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 119,843 |
| | 146,786 |
| | 194,212 |
| 88,243 |
| | 119,843 |
| | 146,786 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (13,763 | ) | | (12,636 | ) | | (17,674 | ) | (9,889 | ) | | (13,763 | ) | | (12,636 | ) |
| Purchase of intangible assets | — |
| | (3,725 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | (3,725 | ) |
| Acquisition and development of software assets | (12,987 | ) | | (22,292 | ) | | (22,712 | ) | (12,291 | ) | | (12,987 | ) | | (22,292 | ) |
| Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | | (100,057 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Decrease in restricted cash | 1,278 |
| | 1,049 |
| | 35,700 |
| 1,252 |
| | 1,278 |
| | 1,049 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) | | (4,686 | ) | (120,985 | ) | | (25,472 | ) | | (37,604 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal payments on capital lease obligations | (2,104 | ) | | (1,783 | ) | | (1,500 | ) | |
| Principal payments on capital lease obligations and other liability | | (3,471 | ) | | (2,104 | ) | | (1,783 | ) |
| Principal payments on notes | (28,333 | ) | | (229,166 | ) | | (232,514 | ) | (23,334 | ) | | (28,333 | ) | | (229,166 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of notes payable | — |
| | 100,000 |
| | 200,000 |
| |
| Discount on notes payable | — |
| | — |
| | (6,000 | ) | |
| Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and revolving credit facility | | 102,500 |
| | — |
| | 100,000 |
|
| Extinguishment of notes | — |
| | (1,054 | ) | | (99,938 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (1,054 | ) |
| Debt related costs | — |
| | (2,697 | ) | | (5,430 | ) | (2,056 | ) | | — |
| | (2,697 | ) |
| Common stock repurchases | (27,545 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (56,294 | ) | | (27,545 | ) | | — |
|
| Acquisition of redeemable noncontrolling interest | | 455 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrant | 1,725 |
| | 4,562 |
| | 1,620 |
| 4,091 |
| | 1,725 |
| | 4,562 |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) | | (143,762 | ) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 21,891 |
| | (56,257 | ) | | (130,138 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 133 |
| | 885 |
| | 957 |
| (1,596 | ) | | 133 |
| | 885 |
|
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 38,247 |
| | (20,071 | ) | | 46,721 |
| (12,447 | ) | | 38,247 |
| | (20,071 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 58,863 |
| | 78,934 |
| | 32,213 |
| 97,110 |
| | 58,863 |
| | 78,934 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 97,110 |
| | $ | 58,863 |
| | $ | 78,934 |
| $ | 84,663 |
| | $ | 97,110 |
| | $ | 58,863 |
|
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the periods for: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest | $ | 4,653 |
| | $ | 15,563 |
| | $ | 63,814 |
| $ | 4,722 |
| | $ | 4,653 |
| | $ | 15,563 |
|
| Income taxes | $ | 2,329 |
| | $ | 2,289 |
| | $ | 544 |
| $ | 2,323 |
| | $ | 2,329 |
| | $ | 2,289 |
|
| Non-cash financing transactions during the periods for: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Conversion of convertible notes into common stock: | | | | | | |
| Third lien convertible notes, net of discount and debt related costs | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,497 |
| |
| Embedded conversion option within third lien convertible notes | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 32,358 |
| |
| Common stock repurchases | $ | 644 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 736 |
| | $ | 644 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Issuance of Common Stock in connection with acquisition of business | | $ | 26,186 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-7 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
|
|
| VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) AND REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
| | | (In thousands) | Common Stock |
| | Additional Paid-in Capital |
| | Accumulated Deficit |
| | Treasury Stock |
| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
| | Total |
| Common Stock |
| | Additional Paid-in Capital |
| | Accumulated Deficit |
| | Treasury Stock |
| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
| | Total |
| | Redeemable non-controlling interest |
| | Net Income |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2009 | $ | 202 |
| | $ | 1,008,547 |
| | $ | (1,088,236 | ) | | $ | (12,878 | ) | | $ | 456 |
| | $ | (91,909 | ) | |
| Stock option exercises | 1 |
| | 1,619 |
| | | | | | | | 1,620 |
| |
| Share-based expense | | | 8,255 |
| | | | | | | | 8,255 |
| |
| Share-based award activity | | | | | | | (261 | ) | | | | (261 | ) | |
| Convertible notes conversion | 20 |
| | 35,384 |
| | | | | | | | 35,404 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | 909 |
| | 909 |
| |
| Net loss | | | | | (83,665 | ) | | | | | | (83,665 | ) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2010 | 223 |
| | 1,053,805 |
| | (1,171,901 | ) | | (13,139 | ) | | 1,365 |
| | (129,647 | ) | $ | 223 |
| | $ | 1,053,805 |
| | $ | (1,171,901 | ) | | $ | (13,139 | ) | | $ | 1,365 |
| | $ | (129,647 | ) | | | |
|
| Stock option exercises | 5 |
| | 4,259 |
| | | | | | | | 4,264 |
| 5 |
| | 4,259 |
| | | | | | | | 4,264 |
| | | | |
| Share-based expense | | | 14,279 |
| | | | | | | | 14,279 |
| | | 14,279 |
| | | | | | | | 14,279 |
| | | | |
| Share-based award activity | | | | | | | (1,390 | ) | | | | (1,390 | ) | | | | | | | (1,390 | ) | | | | (1,390 | ) | | | | |
| Warrant exercise | | | 2,145 |
| | | | | | | | 2,145 |
| | | 2,145 |
| | | | | | | | 2,145 |
| | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | 872 |
| | 872 |
| | | | | | | | | 872 |
| | 872 |
| | | | |
| Net income | | | | | 409,044 |
| | | | | | 409,044 |
| |
| Net loss | | | | | | 409,044 |
| | | | | | 409,044 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | 228 |
| | 1,074,488 |
| | (762,857 | ) | | (14,529 | ) | | 2,237 |
| | 299,567 |
| 228 |
| | 1,074,488 |
| | (762,857 | ) | | (14,529 | ) | | 2,237 |
| | 299,567 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Stock option exercises | 2 |
| | 1,723 |
| | | | | | | | 1,725 |
| 2 |
| | 1,723 |
| | | | | | | | 1,725 |
| | | | |
| Share-based expense | | | 11,975 |
| | | | | | | | 11,975 |
| | | 11,975 |
| | | | | | | | 11,975 |
| | | | |
| Share-based award activity | | | | | | | (625 | ) | | | | (625 | ) | | | | | | | (625 | ) | | | | (625 | ) | | | | |
| Common stock repurchases | | | | | | | (28,189 | ) | | | | (28,189 | ) | | | | | | | (28,189 | ) | | | | (28,189 | ) | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | 335 |
| | 335 |
| | | | | | | | | 335 |
| | 335 |
| | | | |
| Net income | | | | | 36,627 |
| | | | | | 36,627 |
| | | | | 36,627 |
| | | | | | 36,627 |
| | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 230 |
| | $ | 1,088,186 |
| | $ | (726,230 | ) | | $ | (43,343 | ) | | $ | 2,572 |
| | $ | 321,415 |
| 230 |
| | 1,088,186 |
| | (726,230 | ) | | (43,343 | ) | | 2,572 |
| | 321,415 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Stock option exercises | | 9 |
| | 9,545 |
| | | | | | | | 9,554 |
| | | | |
| Stock option cancellation | | | | (5,463 | ) | | | | | | | | (5,463 | ) | | | | |
| Share-based expense | | | | 17,843 |
| | | | | | | | 17,843 |
| | | | |
| Share-based award activity | | | | | | | | (1,311 | ) | | | | (1,311 | ) | | | | |
| Common stock repurchases | | | | | | | | (56,386 | ) | | | | (56,386 | ) | | | | |
| Acquisition of business | | 8 |
| | 26,178 |
| | | | | | | | 26,186 |
| | | | |
| Investment by redeemable noncontrolling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | — |
| | 455 |
| | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | (2,053 | ) | | (2,053 | ) | | (5 | ) | | |
| Net income | | | | | | 28,289 |
| | | | | | 28,289 |
| | (488 | ) | | 27,801 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 247 |
| | $ | 1,136,289 |
| | $ | (697,941 | ) | | $ | (101,040 | ) | | $ | 519 |
| | $ | 338,074 |
| | $ | (38 | ) | |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-8 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Vonage Holdings Corp. (“Vonage”, “Company”, “we”, “our”, “us”) is incorporated as a Delaware corporation. We are a leading provider of low-cost communications services connecting people through cloud-connected devices worldwide. Customers in the United States represented 93%94% of our subscriber lines for our broadband telephone replacement services at December 31, 20122013, with the balance primarily in Canada and the United Kingdom.
|
|
| SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Vonage and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We also consolidate a majority-owned entity in Brazil where we have the ability to exercise controlling influence. The ownership interest of the noncontrolling party is presented as redeemable noncontrolling interest.
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including the following:
| |
| > | the useful lives of property and equipment, software costs, and intangible assets; |
| |
| > | assumptions used for the purpose of determining share-based compensation and the fair value of our prior stock warrant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model (“Model”), and various other assumptions that we believed to be reasonable; the key inputs for this Model are our stock price at valuation date, exercise price, the dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, life in years, and historical volatility of our common stock; |
| |
| > | assumptions used in determining the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets; |
| |
> | assumptions used to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion option within our prior third lien convertible notes using the Monte Carlo simulation model; the key inputs are maturity date, risk-free interest rate, our stock price at valuation date, and historical volatility of our common stock; and |
| |
> | assumptions used to determine the fair value of the embedded make-whole premium feature within our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility. |
We base our estimates on historical experience, available market information, appropriate valuation methodologies, and on various other assumptions that we believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Operating revenues consist of telephony services revenues and customer equipment (which enables our telephony services) and shipping revenues. The point in time at which revenues are recognized is determined in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition.
At the time a customer signs up for our telephony services, there are the following deliverables:
| |
| > | Providing equipment, if any, to the customer that enables our telephony services and |
| |
> | Providing telephony services. |
The equipment is provided free of charge to our customers and in most instances there are no fees collected at sign-up. We record the fees collected for shipping the equipment to the customer, if any, as shipping and handling revenue at the time of shipment.
Telephony Services Revenue
Substantially all of our revenues are telephony services revenues, which are derived primarily from monthly subscription fees that customers are charged under our service plans. We also derive telephony services revenues from per minute fees for international calls if not covered under a plan, including applications for mobile devices and other stand-alone products, and for any calling minutes in excess of a customer’s monthly plan limits. Monthly subscription fees are automatically charged to customers’ credit cards, debit cards or electronic check payments ("ECP"), in advance and are recognized over the following month when services are provided. Revenues generated from international calls and from customers exceeding allocated call minutes under limited minute plans are recognized as services are provided, that is, as minutes are used, and are billed to a customer's credit cards, debit cards or ECP in arrears. As a result of multiple billing cycles each month, we estimate the amount of revenues earned from international calls and from customers exceeding allocated call minutes under limited minute plans but not billed from the end of each billing cycle to the end of each reporting period and record these amounts as accounts receivable. These estimates are based primarily upon historical minutes and have been consistent with our actual results.
We also provide rebates to customers who purchase their customer equipment from retailers and satisfy minimum service period requirements. These rebates in excess of activation fees are recorded as a reduction of revenues over the service period based upon the estimated number of customers that will ultimately earn and claim the rebates.
In the United States, we charge regulatory, compliance, E-911, and intellectual property-related fees on a monthly basis to defray costs, and to cover taxes that we are charged by the suppliers of telecommunications services. In addition, we charge customers Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) fees. We recognize revenue on a gross basis for USF and related fees. We record these fees as revenue when billed. All other taxes are recorded on a net basis.
In addition, historically, we charged a disconnect fee for customers who terminated their service plan within the first twelve months of service. Disconnect fees are recorded as revenue and are recognized at the time the customer terminates service. Beginning in September 2010, we eliminated the disconnect fee for new customers.
F-9 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
In February of 2012 we re-introduced service agreements as an option for new customers
Customer Equipment and Shipping Revenue
Customer equipment and shipping revenues consist of revenues from sales of customer equipment to wholesalers or directly to customers for replacement devices, or for upgrading their device at
F-9 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
the time of customer sign-up for which we charge an additional fee. In addition, customer equipment and shipping revenues include revenues from the sale of VoIP telephones in order to access our small and medium business services on a net basis rather than a gross basis as we act as an agent, rather than a principal. Customer equipment and shipping revenues also include the fees that customers are charged for shipping their customer equipment to them. Customer equipment and shipping revenues include sales to our retailers, who subsequently resell this customer equipment to customers. Revenues were reduced for payments to retailers and rebates to customers, who purchased their customer equipment through these retailers, to the extent of customer equipment and shipping revenues. In addition, historically, we charged an equipment recovery fee for customers who terminated their service plan within the first twelve months of service. Equipment recovery fees are recorded as revenue and are recognized at the time the customer terminates service. Beginning in September 2010, we eliminated the equipment recovery fees for new customers.
Direct Cost of Telephony Services
Direct cost of telephony services consists primarily of direct costs that we pay to third parties in order to provide telephony services. These costs include access and interconnection charges that we pay to other telephone companies to terminate domestic and international phone calls on the public switched telephone network. In addition, these costs include the cost to lease phone numbers, to co-locate in other telephone companies’ facilities, to provide enhanced emergency dialing capabilities to transmit 911 calls, and to provide local number portability. These costs also include taxes that we pay on telecommunications services from our suppliers or are imposed by government agencies such as Federal USF and royalties for use of third parties’ intellectual property. These costs do not include indirect costs such as depreciation and amortization, payroll, and facilities costs. Our presentation of direct cost of telephony services may not be comparable to other similar companies.
Direct Cost of Goods Sold
Direct cost of goods sold consists primarily of costs that we incur when a customer signs up for our service. These costs include the cost of customer equipment for customers who subscribe through the direct sales channel in excess of activation fees. In addition, these costs include the amortization of deferred customer equipment, the cost of shipping and handling for customer equipment, the installation manual that accompanies the customer equipment, and the cost of certain promotions.
Development Expenses
Costs for research, including predevelopment efforts prior to establishing technological feasibility of software expected to be marketed, are expensed as incurred. Development costs are capitalized when technological feasibility has been established and anticipated future revenues support the recoverability of the capitalized amounts. Capitalization stops when the product is available for general release to customers. Due to the short time period between achieving technological feasibility and product release and the insignificant amount of costs incurred during such periods, we have not capitalized any software development, and have expensed these costs as incurred. These costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We maintain cash with several investment grade financial institutions. Highly liquid investments, which are readily convertible into cash, with original maturities of three months or less, are recorded as cash equivalents.
Certain Risks and Concentrations
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. They are subject to fluctuations in both market value and yield based upon changes in market conditions, including interest rates, liquidity, general economic conditions, and conditions specific to the issuers. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenues earned from customers primarily located in the United States. A portion of our accounts receivable represents the timing difference between when a customer’s credit card is billed and the subsequent settlement of that transaction with our credit card processors. This timing difference is generally three days for substantially all of our credit card receivables. We have never experienced any accounts receivable write-offs due to this timing difference. In addition, we collect subscription fees in advance, minimizing our accounts receivable and bad debt exposure. If a customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP is declined, we generally suspend international calling capabilities as well as their ability to incur domestic usage charges in excess of their plan minutes. If the customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP could not be successfully processed during three billing cycles (i.e., the current and two subsequent monthly billing cycles), we terminate the account. In addition, we automatically charge any per minute fees to our customers’ credit card, debit card or ECP monthly in arrears. To further mitigate our bad debt exposure, a customer’s credit card, debit card or ECP will be charged in advance of their monthly billing if their international calling or overage charges exceed a certain dollar threshold.
Inventory
Inventory consists of the cost of customer equipment and is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the average cost method. We provide an inventory allowance for customer equipment that has been returned by customers but may not be able to be reissued to new customers or returned to the manufacturer for credit.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment includes acquired assets and those accounted for under capital leases and consist principally of network equipment and computer hardware, furniture, software, and leasehold improvements. In addition, the lease of our corporate headquarters has been accounted for as a capital lease and is included in property and equipment. Network equipment and computer hardware and furniture are stated at cost with depreciation provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful life of the related assets or the life of the lease, whichever is shorter. The cost of renewals and substantial improvements is capitalized while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to operating expenses as incurred.
Our network equipment and computer hardware, which consists of routers, gateways, and servers that enable our telephony services, is subject to technological risks and rapid market changes due to new products and services and changing customer demand. These changes may result in future adjustments to the estimated useful lives or the carrying value of these assets, or both.
F-10 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Software Costs
We capitalize certain costs, such as purchased software and internally developed software that we use for customer acquisition and customer care automation tools, in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40, “Internal-Use Software”. Computer software is stated at cost less accumulated amortization and the estimated useful life is two to five years.
F-10 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
As previously disclosed, we experienced delays and incremental costs during the course of the development and implementation of a new billing and ordering system by Amdocs Software Systems Limited and Amdocs, Inc. (collectively, "Amdocs") and the transition of customers to the system. We conducted discussions with Amdocs to resolve the issues associated with the billing and ordering system. Based on these discussions, and after our consideration of the progress made improving our overall IT infrastructure, the incremental time and costs to develop and implement the Amdocs system, as well as the expected reduction in capital expenditures, in June 2012 we and Amdocs determined that terminating the program was in the best interest of both parties. On July 30, 2012, we entered into a Settlement Agreement with Amdocs terminating the related license agreement. As a result, we wrote off our investment in the system of $25,262, net of settlement amounts to us, in the second quarter of 2012. This charge is recorded as loss from abandonment of software assets in the statement of operations.income.
Goodwill and Purchased-Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in acquisition of a business is accounted for based upon the excess fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in the business combination. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis on October 1st and, when specific circumstances dictate, between annual tests. When impaired, the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step would need to be conducted; otherwise, no further steps are necessary as no potential impairment exists. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Any excess of the reporting unit goodwill carrying value over the respective implied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Purchased-intangible assets are accounted for based upon the fair value of assets received. Purchased-intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the periods of benefit, ranging from two to ten years. We perform a review of purchased-intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than we had originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, we assess the recoverability of purchased-intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If the useful life of the asset is shorter than originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of amortization and amortize the remaining carrying value over the new shorter useful life. There was no impairment of purchased-intangible assets identified for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets acquired in the settlement of litigation or by direct purchase are accounted for based upon the fair value of assets received. Goodwill acquired in acquisition of a business is accounted for based upon the excess fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in the business combinations.
Patents and Patent Licenses
Patent rights acquired in the settlement of litigation or by direct purchase are accounted for based upon the fair value of assets received.
Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. If our review indicates that the carrying value of an asset will not be recoverable, based on a comparison of the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows, the impairment will be measured by comparing the carrying value of the asset to its fair value. Fair value will be determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows or appraisals. Impairments are recorded in the statement of operationsincome as part of depreciation expense.
Debt Related Costs
Costs incurred in raising debt are deferred and amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the debt.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
We consolidate a majority-owned entity where we have the ability to exercise controlling influence. The ownership interest of the noncontrolling party is presented as noncontrolling interest. If we are required to repurchase the noncontrolling interest at fair value, subject to adjustment, under a put option or other contractual redemption requirement, we will report the noncontrolling interest as redeemable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets between liabilities and equity. We adjust the redeemable noncontrolling interest to the redemption values on each balance sheet date with changes recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings, as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital when it becomes probable the noncontrolling interest will become redeemable.
Restricted Cash and Letters of Credit
We had a cash collateralized letter of credit for $5,3004,306 and $6,3005,300 as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, respectively, related to lease deposits for our offices and a cash collateralized letter of credit for $258 and $536as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to an energy curtailment program for our offices. The total amount of collateralized letters of credit was $5,5584,306 and $6,8365,558 at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, respectively. In the aggregate, cash reserves and collateralized letters of credit of $5,6564,405 and $6,9295,656 were recorded as long-term restricted cash at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, respectively.
Derivatives
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. However, in accordance with FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“FASB ASC 815”), we review our contractual obligations to determine whether there are terms that possess the characteristics of derivative financial instruments that must be accounted for separately from the financial instrument in which they are embedded. In 2011, and 2010, based upon this review, we were required to value the following features separately for accounting purposes:
| |
| > | certain features within a prior common stock warrant to purchase 514 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.58 because the number of shares to be received by the holder could change under certain conditions; |
| |
> | certain features within our prior third lien convertible notes because the number of shares to be received by the holder could have changed under certain conditions; and |
| |
> | the make-whole premium provisions within our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility because upon prepayment under certain circumstances we may have been required to settle the debt for more than its face amount. |
We recognized these features as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet at fair value each period and recognized any change in the fair value in our statement of operationsincome in the period of change. We estimated the fair value of these liabilities using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
F-11 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities at enacted income tax rates for the temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. Any effects of changes in income tax rates or tax laws are included in the provision for income taxes in the period of enactment. Our net deferred tax assets primarily consist of net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”). We are required to record a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets if we conclude that it is more likely than not that taxable income generated in the future will be insufficient to utilize the future income tax benefit from our net deferred tax assets (namely, the NOLs) prior to expiration. We periodically review this conclusion, which requires significant management judgment. If we are able to conclude in a future period that a future income tax benefit from our net deferred tax assets has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized, we are required in that period to reduce the related valuation allowance with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense. This will result in a non-cash benefit to our net income in the period of the determination. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we released $325,601$325,601 of valuation allowance (see Note 5. Income Taxes). We periodically review this conclusion, which requires significant management judgment. In the future, if available evidence changes our conclusion that it is more likely than not that we will utilize our net deferred tax assets prior to their expiration, we will make an adjustment to the related valuation allowance and income tax expense at that time. In subsequent periods, we would expect to recognize income tax expense equal to our pre-tax income multiplied by our effective income tax rate, an expense that was not recognized prior to the reduction of the valuation allowance. Our effective rate may differ from the federal statutory rate due, in part, to our Canadian operations and certain discrete period items, which in 2012 primarily consisted of adjustments related to stock compensation, including a non-cash deferred tax adjustment totaling $4,077$4,077 in 2012 for certain stock compensation previously considered nondeductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis and in U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our federal tax return remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service from 2007 to
F-11 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
present, our New Jersey tax returns remain open from 2007 to present, our Canada tax return remains open from 2009 to present, and other domestic and foreign tax returns remain open for all periods to which those filings relate. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.
We have not had any unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as components of our income tax provision. We have not had any interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits.
Business Combinations
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that the purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as
of the acquisition date. We will include the results of all acquisitions in our Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition.
Acquisition related transaction costs, such as banking, legal, accounting and other costs incurred in connection with an acquisition are expensed as incurred in selling, general and administrative expense.
Acquisition related integration costs include costs associated with exit or disposal activities, which do not meet the criteria of discontinued operations, including costs for employee, lease, and contract terminations, facility closing or other exit activities. Additionally, these costs include expenses directly related to integrating and reorganizing acquired businesses and include items such as employee retention costs, recruiting costs, certain moving costs, certain duplicative costs during integration and asset impairments. These costs are expensed as incurred in selling, general and administrative expense.
Foreign Currency
Generally, the functional currency of our non-United States subsidiaries is the local currency. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated to United States dollars using month-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for revenues, costs, and expenses. Translation gains and losses are deferred and recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity.
Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this pronouncement, share-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, reduced as appropriate based on estimated forfeitures, and is recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period of the stock award using the accelerated method. The excess tax benefit associated with stock compensation deductions have not been recorded in additional paid-in capital. When evaluating whether an excess tax benefit has been realized, share based compensation deductions are not considered realized until NOLs are no longer sufficient to offset taxable income. Such excess tax benefits will be recorded when realized.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
Net income (loss) per share has been computed according to FASB ASC 260, “Earnings per Share”, which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS represents net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during a reporting period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, including warrants, stock options and restricted stock units under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 Incentive Plan, and our prior third lien convertible notes, were exercised or converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding warrants, stock options, and restricted stock units is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. In applying the treasury stock method for stock-based compensation arrangements, the assumed proceeds are computed as the sum of the amount the employee must pay upon exercise and the amounts of average unrecognized compensation cost attributed to future services. The dilutive effect of our prior third lien convertible notes was reflected in diluted earnings per share using the if-converted method.
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Numerator | | | | | |
| Numerator for basic earnings per share - net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) |
| Numerator for diluted earnings per share - net income (loss) | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
| | $ | (83,665 | ) |
| Denominator | | | | | |
| Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
| | 209,868 |
|
| Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units | 8,369 |
| | 17,420 |
| | — |
|
| Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
| | 209,868 |
|
| Basic net income (loss) per share | | | | | |
| Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | | | | | |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | (0.40 | ) |
The following shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because of their anti-dilutive effects:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Common stock warrant | — |
| | 63 |
| | 514 |
|
| Convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | 10,421 |
|
| Restricted stock units | 2,468 |
| | 655 |
| | 2,332 |
|
| Employee stock options | 32,746 |
| | 21,482 |
| | 35,729 |
|
| | 35,214 |
| | 22,200 |
| | 48,996 |
|
F-12 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Numerator | | | | | |
| Numerator for basic earnings per share-net income attributable to Vonage | $ | 28,289 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
|
| Numerator for diluted earnings per share-net income attributable to Vonage | $ | 28,289 |
| | $ | 36,627 |
| | $ | 409,044 |
|
| Denominator | | | | | |
| Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 211,563 |
| | 224,264 |
| | 224,324 |
|
| Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units | 8,957 |
| | 8,369 |
| | 17,420 |
|
| Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 220,520 |
| | 232,633 |
| | 241,744 |
|
| Basic net income per share | | | | | |
| Basic net income per share | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
|
| Diluted net income per share | | | | | |
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
|
The following shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share because of their anti-dilutive effects:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Common stock warrant | — |
| | — |
| | 63 |
|
| Restricted stock units | 3,625 |
| | 2,468 |
| | 655 |
|
| Employee stock options | 25,437 |
| | 32,746 |
| | 21,482 |
|
| | 29,062 |
| | 35,214 |
| | 22,200 |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive items. Other comprehensive items include foreign currency translation adjustments.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years’ financial statements in order to conform to the current year’s presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on net earnings previously reported.
Note 2. Supplemental Balance Sheet Account Information
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
| | | | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Nontrade receivables | $ | 6,599 |
| | $ | 6,432 |
| $ | 7,402 |
| | $ | 6,599 |
|
| Services | 6,092 |
| | 5,767 |
| 7,084 |
| | 6,092 |
|
| Telecommunications | 1,503 |
| | 1,886 |
| 479 |
| | 1,503 |
|
| Insurance | 389 |
| | 795 |
| 757 |
| | 389 |
|
| Marketing | 639 |
| | 640 |
| 312 |
| | 639 |
|
| Other prepaids | 265 |
| | 1,300 |
| 858 |
| | 265 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 15,487 |
| | $ | 16,820 |
| $ | 16,892 |
| | $ | 15,487 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
| Building (under capital lease) | $ | 25,709 |
| | $ | 25,709 |
|
| Network equipment and computer hardware | 87,145 |
| | 137,053 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 43,774 |
| | 43,350 |
|
| Furniture | 842 |
| | 1,102 |
|
| Vehicles | 97 |
| | 258 |
|
| | 157,567 |
| | 207,472 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (97,034 | ) | | (139,494 | ) |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 60,533 |
| | $ | 67,978 |
|
Software, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
| Purchased | $ | 89,538 |
| | $ | 77,724 |
|
| License | 909 |
| | 909 |
|
| Internally developed | 36,088 |
| | 37,696 |
|
| | 126,535 |
| | 116,329 |
|
| Less: accumulated amortization | (71,428 | ) | | (70,668 | ) |
| abandonment of software assets | $ | (35,547 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Software, net | $ | 19,560 |
| | $ | 45,661 |
|
The total expected future annual amortization of software is as follows:
|
| | | |
| 2013 | $ | 9,129 |
|
| 2014 | 6,164 |
|
| 2015 | 4,005 |
|
| 2016 | 213 |
|
| 2017 | 49 |
|
| Total | $ | 19,560 |
|
F-13 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Property and equipment, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Building (under capital lease) | $ | 25,709 |
| | $ | 25,709 |
|
| Network equipment and computer hardware | 78,312 |
| | 87,145 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 44,141 |
| | 43,774 |
|
| Furniture | 812 |
| | 842 |
|
| Vehicles | 109 |
| | 97 |
|
| | 149,083 |
| | 157,567 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (96,840 | ) | | (97,034 | ) |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 52,243 |
| | $ | 60,533 |
|
Software, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Purchased | $ | 45,178 |
| | $ | 89,538 |
|
| License | 909 |
| | 909 |
|
| Internally developed | 36,088 |
| | 36,088 |
|
| | 82,175 |
| | 126,535 |
|
| Less: accumulated amortization | (61,618 | ) | | (71,428 | ) |
| abandonment of software assets | $ | — |
| | $ | (35,547 | ) |
| Software, net | $ | 20,557 |
| | $ | 19,560 |
|
The total expected future annual amortization of software is as follows:
|
| | | |
| 2014 | $ | 9,996 |
|
| 2015 | 7,916 |
|
| 2016 | 2,425 |
|
| 2017 | 186 |
|
| 2018 | 34 |
|
| Total | $ | 20,557 |
|
Debt related costs, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Senior secured term loan | $ | 4,706 |
| | $ | 2,697 |
|
| Less: accumulated amortization | (3,393 | ) | | (1,925 | ) |
| Debt related costs, net | $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 772 |
|
Restricted cash
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Letter of credit-lease deposits | $ | 4,306 |
| | $ | 5,300 |
|
| Letter of credit-energy curtailment program | — |
| | 258 |
|
| | 4,306 |
| | 5,558 |
|
| Cash reserves | 99 |
| | 98 |
|
| Restricted cash | $ | 4,405 |
| | $ | 5,656 |
|
F-14 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Debt related costs, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
| Senior secured term loan | $ | 2,697 |
| | $ | 2,697 |
|
| Less: accumulated amortization | (1,925 | ) | | (690 | ) |
| Debt related costs, net | $ | 772 |
| | $ | 2,007 |
|
Restricted cash
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
| Letter of credit-lease deposits | $ | 5,300 |
| | $ | 6,300 |
|
| Letter of credit-energy curtailment program | 258 |
| | 536 |
|
| | 5,558 |
| | 6,836 |
|
| Cash reserves | 98 |
| | 93 |
|
| Restricted cash | $ | 5,656 |
| | $ | 6,929 |
|
Accrued expenses
| | | | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Compensation and related taxes and temporary labor | $ | 16,376 |
| | $ | 14,773 |
| $ | 20,276 |
| | $ | 16,376 |
|
| Marketing | 10,889 |
| | 10,017 |
| 23,277 |
| | 10,889 |
|
| Taxes and fees | 9,747 |
| | 17,440 |
| 18,207 |
| | 9,747 |
|
| Litigation and settlements | 89 |
| | 5,063 |
| 89 |
| | 89 |
|
| Telecommunications | 9,135 |
| | 9,642 |
| 7,942 |
| | 9,135 |
|
| Other accruals | 4,412 |
| | 7,776 |
| 6,063 |
| | 4,412 |
|
| Customer credits | 2,056 |
| | 2,109 |
| 1,719 |
| | 2,056 |
|
| Professional fees | 2,200 |
| | 2,289 |
| 2,490 |
| | 2,200 |
|
| Accrued interest | 5 |
| | 7 |
| 12 |
| | 5 |
|
| Inventory | 572 |
| | 128 |
| 769 |
| | 572 |
|
| Credit card fees | 306 |
| | 282 |
| 283 |
| | 306 |
|
| Accrued expenses | $ | 55,787 |
| | $ | 69,526 |
| $ | 81,127 |
| | $ | 55,787 |
|
Note 3. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, net
| | | | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Customer relationships | | $ | 39,100 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Developed technology | | 35,200 |
| | — |
|
| Patents and patent licenses | $ | 18,164 |
| | $ | 18,164 |
| 18,264 |
| | 18,164 |
|
| Trademark | 560 |
| | 560 |
| 560 |
| | 560 |
|
| Trade names | | 500 |
| | — |
|
| Non-compete agreements | | 200 |
| | — |
|
| | 18,724 |
| | 18,724 |
| 93,824 |
| | 18,724 |
|
| Less: accumulated amortization | (12,043 | ) | | (9,668 | ) | (16,974 | ) | | (12,043 | ) |
| Intangible assets, net | $ | 6,681 |
| | $ | 9,056 |
| $ | 76,850 |
| | $ | 6,681 |
|
Represents customer relationships, developed technology, trade names and non-compete agreements identified in the acquisition of a business. In addition, includes patents and trademarks we have purchased and licensed, including in connection with the settlement of litigation. We amortize these intangibles
The intangible assets are being amortized over periods which reflect the pattern in which economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized. The customer relationships and developed technology are being amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated useful life of ten years; patents and patent licenses are being amortized over their weighted-averageweighted average remaining lives.lives; trademark is being amortized on a straight-line basis over eight years; trade names are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years; and the non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over two years.
The total expected future annual amortization is as follows:
|
| | | |
| 2014 | $ | 16,943 |
|
| 2015 | 14,185 |
|
| 2016 | 12,560 |
|
| 2017 | 9,480 |
|
| 2018 | 7,505 |
|
| Thereafter | $ | 16,177 |
|
| Total | $ | 76,850 |
|
F-15 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
The total expected future annual amortization is as follows:
|
| | | |
| 2013 | $ | 2,374 |
|
| 2014 | 1,893 |
|
| 2015 | 1,299 |
|
| 2016 | 1,115 |
|
| Total | $ | 6,681 |
|
Note 4. Supplemental Income Statement Account Information
Amounts included in revenues
| | | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| USF fees | $ | 77,781 |
| | $ | 70,549 |
| | $ | 66,292 |
| $ | 70,009 |
| | $ | 77,781 |
| | $ | 70,549 |
|
| Disconnect fee | $ | 3,128 |
| | $ | 1,330 |
| | $ | 9,918 |
| $ | 4,152 |
| | $ | 3,128 |
| | $ | 1,330 |
|
| Initial activation fees | $ | 2,079 |
| | $ | 5,455 |
| | $ | 17,629 |
| $ | 1,278 |
| | $ | 2,079 |
| | $ | 5,455 |
|
| Customer equipment fees | $ | 614 |
| | $ | 613 |
| | $ | 2,307 |
| $ | 418 |
| | $ | 614 |
| | $ | 613 |
|
| Equipment recovery fees | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 1,587 |
| | $ | 7,401 |
| $ | 103 |
| | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 1,587 |
|
| Shipping and handling fees | $ | 1,385 |
| | $ | 1,563 |
| | $ | 2,400 |
| $ | 1,178 |
| | $ | 1,385 |
| | $ | 1,563 |
|
Amounts included in direct cost of telephony services
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| USF costs | $ | 77,781 |
| | $ | 70,549 |
| | $ | 66,292 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| USF costs | $ | 70,009 |
| | $ | 77,781 |
| | $ | 70,549 |
|
Amounts included in direct cost of goods sold
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Shipping and handling cost | $ | 7,064 |
| | $ | 7,624 |
| | $ | 8,390 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Shipping and handling cost | $ | 5,188 |
| | $ | 7,064 |
| | $ | 7,624 |
|
Amounts included in selling, general and administrative expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Advertising costs | $ | 2,053 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Advertising costs | $ | 1,012 |
| | $ | 2,053 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Acquisition related transaction costs | $ | 2,681 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Acquisition related integration costs | $ | 87 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Amounts included in marketing
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Advertising costs | $ | 129,665 |
| | $ | 130,817 |
| | $ | 142,753 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Advertising costs | $ | 142,094 |
| | $ | 129,665 |
| | $ | 130,817 |
|
F-16 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Network equipment and computer hardware | $ | 13,475 |
| | $ | 14,943 |
| | $ | 16,931 |
|
| Software | 10,843 |
| | 9,621 |
| | 12,147 |
|
| Capital leases | 2,200 |
| | 2,199 |
| | 2,199 |
|
| Other leasehold improvements | 4,167 |
| | 3,986 |
| | 3,891 |
|
| Furniture | 120 |
| | 130 |
| | 282 |
|
| Vehicles | 10 |
| | 16 |
| | 19 |
|
| Patents | 2,304 |
| | 2,306 |
| | 1,205 |
|
| Trademarks | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
|
| Customer relationships | 1,644 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquired technology | 813 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Trade names | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Non-compete agreements | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | 35,672 |
| | 33,271 |
| | 36,744 |
|
| Property and equipment impairments | 9 |
| | (2 | ) | | 307 |
|
| Software impairments | 385 |
| | 55 |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 36,066 |
| | $ | 33,324 |
| | $ | 37,051 |
|
Amounts included in interest expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Debt related costs amortization | $ | 1,515 |
| | $ | 1,235 |
| | $ | 1,391 |
|
Amounts included in other expense, net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Net losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions | $ | (109 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | (328 | ) |
F-17 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Network equipment and computer hardware | $ | 14,943 |
| | $ | 16,931 |
| | $ | 20,887 |
|
| Software | 9,621 |
| | 12,147 |
| | 22,602 |
|
| Capital leases | 2,199 |
| | 2,199 |
| | 2,199 |
|
| Other leasehold improvements | 3,986 |
| | 3,891 |
| | 3,679 |
|
| Furniture | 130 |
| | 282 |
| | 1,827 |
|
| Vehicles | 16 |
| | 19 |
| | 15 |
|
| Patents | 2,376 |
| | 1,275 |
| | 1,145 |
|
| | 33,271 |
| | 36,744 |
| | 52,354 |
|
| Property and equipment impairments | (2 | ) | | 307 |
| | 584 |
|
| Software impairments | 55 |
| | — |
| | 135 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 33,324 |
| | $ | 37,051 |
| | $ | 53,073 |
|
Amounts included in interest expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Debt related costs amortization | $ | 1,235 |
| | $ | 1,391 |
| | $ | 1,402 |
|
Amounts included in other expense, net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
|
| Net losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | (328 | ) | | $ | (19 | ) |
F-17 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 5. Income Taxes
The components of income (loss) before income tax expense are as follows:
| | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| United States | $ | 46,904 |
| | $ | 77,821 |
| | $ | (86,030 | ) | $ | 39,650 |
| | $ | 46,904 |
| | $ | 77,821 |
|
| Foreign | 11,818 |
| | 8,519 |
| | 2,683 |
| 6,345 |
| | 11,818 |
| | 8,519 |
|
| | $ | 58,722 |
| | $ | 86,340 |
| | $ | (83,347 | ) | $ | 45,995 |
| | $ | 58,722 |
| | $ | 86,340 |
|
The components of the income tax (expense) benefit are as follows:
| | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Current: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | (979 | ) | | $ | (1,199 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | (907 | ) | | $ | (979 | ) | | $ | (1,199 | ) |
| Foreign | (142 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (14 | ) | (155 | ) | | (142 | ) | | (24 | ) |
| State and local taxes | (1,486 | ) | | (1,674 | ) | | (304 | ) | (337 | ) | | (1,486 | ) | | (1,674 | ) |
| | $ | (2,607 | ) | | $ | (2,897 | ) | | $ | (318 | ) | $ | (1,399 | ) | | $ | (2,607 | ) | | $ | (2,897 | ) |
| Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | (12,642 | ) | | $ | 297,127 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | (14,954 | ) | | $ | (12,642 | ) | | $ | 297,127 |
|
| Foreign | (3,479 | ) | | 9,797 |
| | — |
| (1,603 | ) | | (3,479 | ) | | 9,797 |
|
| State and local taxes | (3,367 | ) | | 18,677 |
| | — |
| (238 | ) | | (3,367 | ) | | 18,677 |
|
| | $ | (19,488 | ) | | $ | 325,601 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | (16,795 | ) | | $ | (19,488 | ) | | $ | 325,601 |
|
| | $ | (22,095 | ) | | $ | 322,704 |
| | $ | (318 | ) | $ | (18,194 | ) | | $ | (22,095 | ) | | $ | 322,704 |
|
The following table summarizes deferred taxes resulting from differences between financial accounting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
| | | | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| Current assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Deferred revenue | $ | 13,806 |
| | $ | 15,663 |
| $ | 14,846 |
| | $ | 13,806 |
|
| Accounts receivable and inventory allowances | 370 |
| | 314 |
| 335 |
| | 370 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 1,771 |
| | 3,569 |
| 3,180 |
| | 1,771 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net, current | $ | 15,947 |
| | $ | 19,546 |
| $ | 18,361 |
| | $ | 15,947 |
|
| Non-current assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment | $ | 3,735 |
| | $ | 1,986 |
| |
| Acquired intangible assets and property and equipment | | $ | (23,762 | ) | | $ | 3,735 |
|
| Research and development and alternative minimum tax credit | 2,697 |
| | 1,711 |
| 3,613 |
| | 2,697 |
|
| Stock option compensation | 16,965 |
| | 11,891 |
| 17,317 |
| | 16,965 |
|
| Capital leases | (3,250 | ) | | (2,455 | ) | (4,486 | ) | | (3,250 | ) |
| Deferred revenue | | (627 | ) | | — |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 282,609 |
| | 310,605 |
| 271,503 |
| | 282,609 |
|
| | 302,756 |
| | 323,738 |
| 263,558 |
| | 302,756 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (12,590 | ) | | (17,683 | ) | (16,922 | ) | | (12,590 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets, net, non-current | $ | 290,166 |
| | $ | 306,055 |
| $ | 246,636 |
| | $ | 290,166 |
|
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities at enacted income tax rates for the temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. Any effects of changes in income tax rates or tax laws are included in the provision for income taxes in the period of enactment. Our net deferred tax assets primarily consist of net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”). We are required to record a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets if we conclude that it is more likely than not that taxable income
generated in the future will be insufficient to utilize the future income tax benefit from our net deferred tax assets (namely, the NOLs), prior to expiration. We periodically review this conclusion, which requires significant management judgment. Until the fourth quarter of 2011, we recorded a valuation allowance fully against our net deferred tax assets. In 2011, we completed our first full year of taxable income and completed our budgetary process for periods subsequent to 2011, which anticipates continued taxable income in the future. Based upon these factors and our sustained profitable operating performance over the past three years
F-18 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
our sustained profitable operating performance over the past three years excluding certain losses associated with our prior convertible notes and our December 2010 debt refinancing, our evaluation determined that the benefit resulting from our net deferred tax assets (namely, the NOLs), are likely to be realized prior to their expiration. Accordingly, we released the related valuation allowance against our United States federal and Canada net deferred tax assets, and a portion of the allowance against our state net deferred tax assets as certain NOLs may expire prior to utilization due to shorter utilization periods in certain states, resulting in a one-time non-cash income tax benefit of $325,601$325,601 and a corresponding net deferred tax asset of $325,601$325,601 in the fourth quarter of 2011. We still maintain a full valuation allowance against our United
Kingdom net deferred tax assets as we are unable to conclude that it is more likely than not that some or all of the related United Kingdom net deferred tax assets will be realized.
In connection with the acquisition of Vocalocity, we recorded a net deferred tax liability of $24,000 related to the $75,000 of identified
intangible assets that will be amortized for financial reporting purposes but not for tax purposes and a deferred tax asset of $8,637 primarily consisting of NOLs. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $2,637 against Vocalocity's deferred tax assets based upon our preliminary assessment of the utilization of the NOLs as the NOLs are subject to Section 382 limitations.
In the future, if available evidence changes our conclusion that it is more likely than not that we will utilize our net deferred tax assets prior to their expiration, we will make an adjustment to the related valuation allowance and income tax expense at that time. In subsequent periods, we would expect to recognize income tax expense equal to our pre-tax income multiplied by our effective income tax rate, an expense that was not recognized prior to the reduction of the valuation allowance.
The reconciliation between the United States statutory federal income tax rate and the effective rate is as follows:
| | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| U.S. Federal statutory tax rate | 35 | % | | 35 | % | | (34 | )% | 35 | % | | 35 | % | | 35 | % |
| Permanent items | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 2 | % | 4 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| State and local taxes, net of federal benefit | 5 | % | | (13 | )% | | — | % | — | % | | 5 | % | | (13 | )% |
| International tax | (1 | )% | | (15 | )% | | — | % | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (15 | )% |
| Valuation reserve for income taxes and other | (2 | )% | | (383 | )% | | 32 | % | 1 | % | | (2 | )% | | (383 | )% |
| Effective tax rate | 38 | % | | (375 | )% | | — | % | 39 | % | | 38 | % | | (375 | )% |
As of December 31, 2012, we had NOLs for United States federal and state tax purposes of $744,139 and $290,196, respectively, expiring at various times from years ending 2013 through 2031 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Federal | | State |
| 2013 | $ | — |
| | $ | 26,797 |
|
| 2014 | — |
| | 17,671 |
|
| 2015 | — |
| | 6,263 |
|
| 2016 | — |
| | 16,134 |
|
| 2017 | — |
| | 21,649 |
|
| 2018 | — |
| | 11,148 |
|
| 2019 | — |
| | 10,250 |
|
| 2020 | — |
| | 1,889 |
|
| 2021 | — |
| | 5,306 |
|
| 2022 | — |
| | 17,709 |
|
| 2023 | — |
| | 2,328 |
|
| 2024 | — |
| | 263 |
|
| 2025 | 204,805 |
| | 11,959 |
|
| 2026 | 189,428 |
| | 26,566 |
|
| 2027 | 231,193 |
| | 47,501 |
|
| 2028 | 25,966 |
| | 10,446 |
|
| 2029 | 1,320 |
| | 1,668 |
|
| 2030 | 91,427 |
| | 49,456 |
|
| 2031 | — |
| | 5,193 |
|
| Total | $ | 744,139 |
| | $ | 290,196 |
|
United States federal and state NOLs of $4,992 represent excess tax benefits from the exercise of share based awards which will
be recorded in additional paid-in capital when realized. In addition, we had NOLs for Canadian tax purposes of $25,476 with $8,623 expiring in 2026 and $16,853 expiring in 2027. We also had NOLs for United
F-19 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
As of December 31, 2013, we had NOLs for United States federal and state tax purposes of $715,524 and $251,627, respectively, expiring at various times from years ending 2014 through 2033 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Federal | | State |
| 2014 | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,968 |
|
| 2015 | — |
| | 5,745 |
|
| 2016 | — |
| | 6,244 |
|
| 2017 | — |
| | 12,361 |
|
| 2018 | — |
| | 4,484 |
|
| 2019 | — |
| | 14 |
|
| 2020 | — |
| | 8,200 |
|
| 2021 | 963 |
| | 9,862 |
|
| 2022 | 30 |
| | 20,963 |
|
| 2023 | 1 |
| | 12,565 |
|
| 2024 | 494 |
| | 1,882 |
|
| 2025 | 157,020 |
| | 9,071 |
|
| 2026 | 190,275 |
| | 23,974 |
|
| 2027 | 232,525 |
| | 45,652 |
|
| 2028 | 30,871 |
| | 13,733 |
|
| 2029 | 4,664 |
| | 4,993 |
|
| 2030 | 96,056 |
| | 46,098 |
|
| 2031 | 1,908 |
| | 7,101 |
|
| 2032 | — |
| | — |
|
| 2033 | 717 |
| | 717 |
|
| Total | $ | 715,524 |
| | $ | 251,627 |
|
United States federal and state NOLs of $5,328 represent excess tax benefits from the exercise of share based awards which will be recorded in additional paid-in capital when realized. In addition, we had NOLs for Canadian tax purposes of $14,171 expiring in 2027. We also had NOLs for United Kingdom tax purposes of $37,76541,423 with no expiration date.
No provision has been made for income taxes on the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries of $42,440 at December 31, 2012 as we intend to indefinitely reinvest such earnings.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, if we undergo an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in our equity ownership over a three-year period),
our ability to use our pre-change of control NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes against our post-change income may be limited. The Section 382 limitation is applied annually so as to limit the use of our pre-change NOLs to an amount that generally equals the value of our stock immediately before the ownership change multiplied by a
designated federal long-term tax-exempt rate. At December 31, 20122013, there were no limitations on the use of our NOLs.
We participated in the State of New Jersey’s corporation business tax benefit certificate transfer program, which allowsNOLs except for certain high technology and biotechnology companies to transfer unused New Jersey net operating loss carryovers to other New Jersey corporation business taxpayers. During 2003 and 2004, we submitted an application to the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, or EDA, to participate in the program and the application was approved. The EDA then issued a certificate certifying our eligibility to participate in the program. The program requires that a purchaser pay at least 75% of the amountNOLs of Vocalocity as of the surrendered tax benefit. In tax years 2010, 2011, and 2012, we sold approximately, $2,194, $0, and $0, respectively,date of our New Jersey State net operating loss carry forwards for a recognized benefit of approximately $168 in 2010, $0 in 2011, and $0 in 2012, respectively. Collectively, all transactions represent approximately 85% of the surrendered tax benefit each year and have been recognized in the year received.acquisition.
F-20 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 6. Long-Term Debt and Revolving Credit Facility
A schedule of long-term debt at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
|
| 3.25-3.75% 2011 Credit Facility - due 2014 | $ | 14,167 |
| | $ | 42,500 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
|
| 3.25-3.75% 2011 Credit Facility - due 2014 | $ | — |
| | $ | 14,167 |
|
| 3.125-3.625% 2013 Credit Facility - due 2016 | $ | 23,333 |
| | $ | — |
|
| 3.125-3.625% 2013 Revolving Credit Facility - due 2016 | $ | 75,000 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total Long-Term Debt and Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 98,333 |
| | $ | 14,167 |
|
F-20 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
At December 31, 20122013, future payments under long-term debt obligations over each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
| | | 2011 Credit Facility |
| 2013 Credit Facility |
|
| 2013 | 28,333 |
| |
| 2014 | 14,167 |
| 23,333 |
|
| 2015 | | 23,333 |
|
| 2016 | | 75,000 |
|
| Minimum future payments of principal | 42,500 |
| 121,666 |
|
| Current portion | 28,333 |
| 23,333 |
|
| Long-term portion | $ | 14,167 |
| $ | 98,333 |
|
Acquisition of Vocalocity
In connection with our acquisition of Vocalocity, we financed the transaction with $75,000 from our revolving credit facility.
February 2013 Financing
On February 11, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2011 Credit Agreement (the(as further amended by Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Facility, the "2013 Credit Facility"). The 2013 Credit Facility consists of a $70,000 senior secured term loan and a $75,000 revolving credit facility. The co-borrowers under the 2013 Credit Facility are us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors. On July 26, 2013 we entered into Amendment No. 2 to our 2011 Credit Agreement, which amends our financial covenant related to our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio by increasing the amount of restricted payments excluded from such calculation from $50,000 to $80,000.
Use of Proceeds
We used $42,500$42,500 of the net available proceeds of the 2013 Credit Facility to retire all of the debt under our 2011 Credit Facility. Remaining net proceeds of $27,500 from the senior secured term loan and the undrawn revolving credit facility under the 2013 Credit Facility will be used for general corporate purposes. We also incurred $2,009 of fees in connection with the 2013 Credit Facility, which is amortized, along with the pre-existing unamortized fees of $670 in connection with the 2011 Credit Facility, to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. We used $75,000 from the 2013 revolving credit facility in connection with the acquisition of Vocalocity on November 15, 2013.
2013 Credit Facility Terms
The following description summarizes the material terms of the 2013 Credit Facility:
The loans under the 2013 Credit Facility mature in February 2016. Principal amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility are repayable in quarterly installments of $5,833 per quarter for the senior secured term loan. The unused portion of our revolving credit facility incurs a 0.45% commitment fee.
Outstanding amounts under the 2013 Credit Facility, at our option, will bear interest at:
| |
| > | LIBOR (applicable to one-, two-, three- or six-month periods) plus an applicable margin equal to 3.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 3.375% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 3.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last day of each relevant interest period or, if the interest period is longer than three months, each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or |
each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or
| |
> | the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and (c) the |
LIBOR rate applicable to one month interest periods plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin equal to 2.125% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 2.275% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 2.625% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December and the maturity date of the 2013 Credit Facility.
The 2013 Credit Facility provides greater flexibility to us in funding acquisitions and restricted payments, such as stock buybacks, than the 2011 Credit Facility.
We may prepay the 2013 Credit Facility at our option at any time without premium or penalty. The 2013 Credit Facility is subject to mandatory prepayments in amounts equal to:
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds from any non-ordinary course sale or other disposition of our property and assets for consideration in excess of a certain amount subject to customary reinvestment provisions and certain other exceptions and |
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds received in connection with other non-ordinary course transactions, including insurance proceeds not otherwise applied to the relevant insurance loss. |
Subject to certain restrictions and exceptions, the 2013 Credit Facility permits us to obtain one or more incremental term loans and/or revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $60,000 plus an amount equal to repayments of the senior secured term loan upon providing documentation reasonably satisfactory to the administrative agent, without the consent of the existing lenders under the 2013 Credit Facility. The 2013 Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants of the borrowers. In addition, the 2013 Credit Facility contains customary negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the ability of us and our subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions, make investments, and pay dividends and other distributions. We must also comply with the following financial covenants:
| |
| > | a consolidated leverage ratio of no greater than 2.00 to 1.00; |
| |
> | a consolidated fixed coverage charge ratio of no less than |
F-21 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
1.75 to 1.00 subject to adjustment to exclude up to $50,000 in specified restricted payments;
| |
> | minimum cash of $25,000 including the unused portion of the revolving credit facility or $35,000 in the event of certain specified corporate actions; and |
F-21 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| |
| > | maximum capital expenditures not to exceed $55,000 during any fiscal year, provided that the unused amount of any permitted capital expenditures in any fiscal year may be carried forward to the next following fiscal year. In addition, annual excess cash flow up to $8,000 increases permitted capital expenditures. |
The 2013 Credit Facility contains customary events of default that may permit acceleration of the debt. During the continuance of a payment default, interest will accrue at a default interest rate of 2% above the interest rate which would otherwise be applicable, in the case of loans, and at a rate equal to the rate applicable to base rate loans plus 2%, in the case of all other amounts.
July 2011 Financing
On July 29, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement (the "2011 Credit Facility") consisting of an $85,000 senior secured term loan and a $35,000 revolving credit facility. The co-borrowers under the 2011 Credit Facility were us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2011 Credit Facility were guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors.
Use of Proceeds
We used $100,000 of the net available proceeds of the 2011 Credit Facility, plus $31,000 of cash on hand, to retire all of the debt under the credit facility that we entered into in December 2010 (the "2010 Credit Facility"), including a $1,000 prepayment fee to holders of the 2010 Credit Facility. We also incurred $2,697 of fees in connection with the 2011 Credit Facility, which is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The amortization for the year ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $1,235 and $690, respectively. The accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $1,925 and $690, respectively.
Repayments
In 2012 and 2011, we made mandatory repayment of $28,333 and $14,166, respectively, under the senior secured term loan. In addition, we repaid the $15,000 outstanding under the revolving credit facility in 2011.
2011 Credit Facility Terms
The following description summarizes the material terms of the 2011 Credit Facility:
The loans under the 2011 Credit Facility mature in July 2014. Principal amounts under the 2011 Credit Facility are repayable in installments of $7,083 per quarter for the senior secured term loan. The unused portion of our revolving credit facility incurs a 0.50% commitment fee.
Outstanding amounts under each of the senior secured term loan and the revolving credit facility, at our option, will bear interest at:
| |
| > | LIBOR (applicable to one-, two-, three- or six-month periods) plus an applicable margin equal to 3.25% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 3.5% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 |
to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 3.75% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last day of each relevant interest period or, if the interest period is longer than three months, each day that is three months after the first day of the interest period, or
| |
> | the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and (c) the LIBOR rate applicable to one month interest periods plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin equal to 2.25% if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 0.75 to 1.00, 2.5% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00 and less than 1.50 to 1.00, and 2.75% if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00, payable on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December and the maturity date of the 2011 Credit Facility. |
September, and December and the maturity date of the 2011 Credit Facility.
The 2011 Credit Facility provides greater flexibility to us in funding acquisitions and restricted payments, such as stock buybacks, than the 2010 Credit Facility.
We may prepay the 2011 Credit Facility at our option at any time without premium or penalty. The 2011 Credit Facility is subject to mandatory prepayments in amounts equal to:
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds from any non-ordinary course sale or other disposition of our property and assets for consideration in excess of a certain amount subject to customary reinvestment provisions and certain other exceptions and |
| |
| > | 100% of the net cash proceeds received in connection with other non-ordinary course transactions, including insurance proceeds not otherwise applied to the relevant insurance loss. |
Subject to certain restrictions and exceptions, the 2011 Credit Facility permits us to obtain one or more incremental term loans and/or revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $60,000 plus an amount equal to repayments of the senior secured term loan upon providing documentation reasonably satisfactory to the administrative agent, without the consent of the existing lenders under the 2011 Credit Facility. The 2011 Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties and affirmative covenants of the borrowers. In addition, the 2011 Credit Facility contains customary negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the ability of us and our subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions, make investments, and pay dividends and other distributions. We must also comply with the following financial covenants:
| |
| > | a consolidated leverage ratio of no greater than 2.00 to 1.00; |
| |
> | a consolidated fixed coverage charge ratio of no less than 1.75 to 1.00; |
| |
> | minimum cash of $25,000 including the unused portion of the revolving credit facility; and |
| |
| > | maximum capital expenditures not to exceed $55,000 during any fiscal year, provided that the unused amount of any permitted capital expenditures in any fiscal year may be carried forward to the next following fiscal year, plus a portion of annual excess cash flow up to $8,000. |
As of December 31, 20122013, we were in compliance with all covenants, including financial covenants, for the 2011 Credit Facility.
The 2011 Credit Facility contains customary events of default that may permit acceleration of the debt. During the continuance of a payment default, interest will accrue at a default interest rate of 2% above the interest rate which would otherwise be applicable, in the case
F-22 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
of loans, and at a rate equal to the rate applicable to base rate loans plus 2%, in the case of all other amounts.
December 2010 Financing
On December 14, 2010, we entered into the 2010 Credit Facility consisting of a $200,000 senior secured term loan. The co-borrowers under the 2010 Credit Facility were us and Vonage America Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. Obligations under the 2010 Credit Facility were guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, by our other United States subsidiaries and were secured by substantially all of the assets of each borrower and each of the guarantors. An affiliate of the chairman of our board of directors and one of our principal stockholders was a lender under the 2010 Credit Facility.
Use of Proceeds
F-22 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
We used the net proceeds of the 2010 Credit Facility of $194,000 ($200,000 principal amount less original discount of $6,000), plus $102,090 of cash on hand, to (i) exercise our existing right to retire debt under our prior senior secured first lien credit facility, for 100% of the contractual make-whole price, (ii) retire debt under our prior senior secured second lien credit facility at a more than 25% discount to the contractual make-whole price, and (iii) cause the conversion of all then outstanding third lien convertible notes into 8,276 shares of our common stock We also incurred $11,444 of fees in connection with the 2010 Credit Facility and repayment of our prior 2008 financing. We agreed to make an additional cash payment to the holders of our prior senior secured second lien credit facility in an aggregate amount of $9,000 if we engaged in Qualifying Discussions (as defined in the Master Agreement) prior to June 30, 2011 that result in a merger or acquisition transaction (as defined in the Master Agreement) that is consummated prior to June 30, 2012. No such discussions occurred prior to June 30, 2012.
In accordance with FASB ASC 470 “Debt Modification and Extinguishment”, substantially all of the repayment of the Prior Financing was treated as an extinguishment of notes resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of notes of $26,531. For the portion of the repayment
of the Prior Financing treated as a debt modification, we carried forward $1,072 of unamortized discount, which will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method in addition to the $6,000 of original issue discount in connection with the 2010 Credit Facility. The accumulated amortization as of December 31, 20112012 was $7,072, including acceleration of $6,081. The amortization for 2011 was $915.
Repayments
In 2011, we made repayments of the entire $200,000 under the 2010 Credit Facility, with $20,000 designated to cover our 2011 mandatory amortization, $50,000 designated to cover our 2011 annual excess cash flow mandatory repayment, if any, and $130,000 designated to cover the outstanding principal balance under the 2010 Credit Facility at the time of the 2011 Credit Facility financing. A loss on extinguishment of $11,806, representing a $1,000 prepayment fee to holders of the 2010 Credit Facility, professional fees of $54, and acceleration of unamortized debt discount and debt related costs of $6,081 and $4,671, respectively, was recorded in 2011 as a result of the repayments.
November 2008 Financing
On October 19, 2008, we entered into definitive agreements (collectively, the “Credit Documentation”) for a financing consisting of (i) a $130,300 senior secured first lien credit facility (the "First Lien Senior Facility"), (ii) a $72,000 senior secured second lien credit facility (the "Second Lien Senior Facility"), and (iii) the sale of $18,000 of our third lien convertible notes (the "Convertible Notes"). The funding for this transaction was completed on November 3, 2008.
For the First Lien Senior Facility, an aggregate value of $105,322, or a discount of $24,978, was recorded. This discount was amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The accumulated amortization was $24,798 at December 31, 2010, including the acceleration of unamortized discount on notes related to the prepayment and repayment of the First Lien Senior Facility of $14,539 at December 31, 2010. The amortization for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $4,006.
For the Second Lien Senior Facility, an aggregate value of $67,273, or a discount of $4,727, was recorded. This discount was amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The accumulated amortization was $4,727 at December 31, 2010, including the acceleration of unamortized discount on notes related to the prepayment and repayment of the Second Lien Senior Facility of $3,360. The amortization for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $601.
For the Convertible Notes, an aggregate value of $55,884 or a premium of $37,884 was recorded. Given the magnitude of the premium, this amount was recorded as additional-paid-in capital as prescribed in FASB ASC 470-20-25 “Debt with Conversions and Other Options-Recognition”.
Consolidated Excess Cash Flow Prepayments
Beginning March 31, 2010, because it was the first quarter during which we had more than $75,000 of specified unrestricted cash in any quarter, we offered to prepay without premium 50% of the Consolidated Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Credit Documentation) each quarter.
First Lien Senior Facility Prepayments
Consolidated Excess Cash Flow - March 31, 2010. On April 22, 2010, we offered to prepay $24,032 of loans under the First Lien Senior Facility. While certain holders of loans under the First Lien Senior Facility waived their right to receive the prepayment as permitted under the Credit Documentation, the $24,032 offered was paid on April 27, 2010 to holders that did not waive the prepayment including certain affiliates or associates of the Company's directors. Of this amount, $23,187 was applied to the outstanding principal balance, and $845 was applied to accrued but unpaid interest. A loss on extinguishment of $4,034, representing acceleration of unamortized debt discount, debt related costs, and administrative agent fees of $3,312, $662 and $60, respectively, was recorded in the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 as a result of the prepayment.
Consolidated Excess Cash Flow - June 30, 2010. On July 16, 2010, we offered to prepay $40,776 of loans under the First Lien Senior Facility. While certain holders of loans under the First Lien Senior Facility waived their right to receive the prepayment as permitted under the Credit Documentation, $4,655 was paid on July 21, 2010 to holders that did not waive the prepayment, who were affiliates or associates of the Company's directors. Of this amount, $4,499 was applied to the outstanding principal balance and $156 was applied to accrued but unpaid interest. A loss on extinguishment of $731, representing acceleration of unamortized debt discount, debt related costs, and administrative agent fees of $605, $120 and $6, respectively, was recorded in the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the prepayment.
Consolidated Excess Cash Flow - September 30, 2010. OnNovember 15, 2010, we offered to prepay loans under the First Lien Senior Facility and the Second Lien Senior Facility in an aggregate amount of $11,084. The holders of the First Lien Senior Facility and Second Lien Senior Facility waived their right to prepayment.
Second Lien Senior Facility Prepayments
Consolidated Excess Cash Flow - June 30, 2010. On July 16, 2010, concurrent with the prepayment offer under the First Lien Senior Facility, we offered to prepay $40,776 of loans under the Second Lien
F-23 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Senior Facility less $4,655 required to prepay amounts under the First Lien Senior Facility prepayment offer. While certain holders of loans under the Second Lien Senior Facility waived their right to receive the prepayment as permitted under the Credit Documentation, $13,281 was paid on July 21, 2010 to holders that did not waive the prepayment, who were affiliates or associates of the Company's directors. Of this amount $13,128 was applied to the outstanding principal balance of which $3,668 represents payment of PIK interest, which was recorded as a component of cash flows from financing activities, and $153 was applied to accrued but unpaid interest. A loss on extinguishment of $813, representing acceleration of unamortized debt discount, debt related costs, and administrative agent fees of $472, $325 and $16, respectively, was recorded in the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the prepayment.
Other Prepayments under First Lien Senior Facility and Second Lien Senior Facility
The First Lien Senior Facility and Second Lien Senior Facility included make-whole premiums that were bifurcated from the underlying debt instrument and valued as a separate financial instrument because the economic and risk characteristics of the make-whole premiums meet the criteria for separate accounting as set forth in FASB ASC 815. The First Lien Senior Facility and Second Lien Senior Facility make-whole premiums were paid on December 14, 2010.
Third Lien Convertible Notes
Subject to conversion, repayment or repurchase of the Convertible Notes, the Convertible Notes were to mature in October 2015. Subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments (including triggers upon the issuance of common stock below the market price of the common stock or the conversion price of the Convertible Notes), the Convertible Notes were convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate equal to 3,448.2759 shares for each $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, or approximately $0.29 per share. As of December 31, 2010, all of the outstanding $18,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes were converted into 62,069 shares of our common stock. In connection with note conversions during the year ended December 31, 2010, $2,258 was paid for accrued interest.
In accordance with guidance codified in FASB ASC 815, which was effective January 1, 2009, we determined that the Convertible Notes contained an embedded derivative that required separate valuation from the Convertible Notes because an anti-dilution adjustment would have been triggered upon the issuance of common stock by us below the conversion price of the Convertible Notes. As explained below, we recognized this embedded derivative as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet at its fair value each period and recognized any change in the fair value in our statement of operations in the period of change. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The key inputs in the model were maturity date, risk-free interest rate, current share price and historical volatility of our common stock.
In accordance with FASB ASC 815, we determined the fair value of the conversion feature and recorded applicable amounts as follows:
Issuance. The fair value of the conversion feature at issuance was $39,990 which, upon the adoption of FASB ASC 815, was recorded as a liability with a corresponding reduction in additional-paid-in capital
of $37,884, which was the premium originally recorded at issuance. The remaining $2,106 was recorded as a discount to be amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. Accumulated amortization of the discount was $2,106 as of December 31, 2010, including a $515 acceleration of unamortized discount on notes related to the conversion of Convertible Notes for the year ended December 31, 2010. Amortization for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $50.
December 31, 2008. The fair value of the conversion feature at December 31, 2008 was $32,720. The $7,270 difference between the fair value of the conversion feature at December 31, 2008 and the issuance date, together with the$47 amortization of the discount for the period ended December 31, 2008, were recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings that was recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as of January 1, 2009 in accordance with FASB ASC 815.
Conversion of Convertible Notes in 2009. At the time of conversions of $12,305 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which were converted into 42,431 shares of our common stock, we determined that the aggregate fair value of the conversion feature of those Convertible Notes was $57,050, which was an increase of $34,682 in the fair value of the conversion feature from December 31, 2008. The changes in fair value were recorded as an expense within other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The aggregate fair value of the common stock issued by us in the conversion was $62,370 at the time of conversion, which was recorded as common stock and additional paid-in capital. In addition, in connection with the extinguishment of the converted Convertible Notes, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of $4,041, which represented the difference in the carrying value of those Convertible Notes including the fair value of the conversion feature, which was reduced by the discount of $1,271 and debt related costs of $1,673 associated with those Convertible Notes, and the fair value of the common stock issued at the time of conversion.
Conversion of Convertible Notes in 2010. At the time of conversions of the remaining $5,695 principal amount of Convertible Notes (including $2,400 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which were held by certain affiliates or associates of the Company's directors), which converted into 19,638 shares of our common stock, we determined that the aggregate fair value of the conversion feature of those Convertible Notes was $32,358, which was an increase in value of $7,308 from the fair value of the conversion feature as of December 31, 2009. This change in fair value was recorded as income within other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2010. The aggregate fair value of the common stock issued by us in the conversion was $35,404 at the time of conversion, which was recorded as common stock and additional paid-in capital. In addition, in connection with the extinguishment of the converted Convertible Notes, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of $786 for the year ended December 31, 2010, which represented the difference in the carrying value of those Convertible Notes including and the fair value of the conversion feature, which was reduced by the discount of $515 and debt related costs of $683 for the year ended December 31, 2010, associated with those Convertible Notes, and the fair value of the common stock issued at the time of conversion and the payment made to note holders of $2,237 to induce conversion.
F-24 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB ASC 820-10-25, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. This standard establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. We did not elect fair value accounting for any assets and liabilities allowed by FASB ASC 825, “Financial Instruments”.
FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the amount that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. FASB ASC 820-10 describes the following three levels of inputs that may be used:
| |
| > | Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. |
| |
| > | Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but corroborated by market data. |
| |
| > | Level 3: Unobservable inputs when there is little or no market data available, thereby requiring an entity to develop its own |
assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
All prior third lien convertible notes were converted as of December 31, 2010. The following table sets forth a summary of change in the fair value of our embedded conversion option for the year ended December 31, 2010;
|
| | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
| Liabilities: | | 2010 |
|
| Beginning balance | | $ | 25,050 |
|
| Increase in value for notes converted | | 7,308 |
|
| Fair value adjustment for notes converted | | (32,358 | ) |
| Total unrealized loss in earning | | — |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | — |
|
The following table sets forth a summary of change in the fair value of our make-whole premiums for as of December 31, 2010;
|
| | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
Liabilities: | | 2010 |
|
Beginning balance | | $ | — |
|
Increase in value | | 91,686 |
|
Fair value adjustment for make-whole premium paid | | (91,686 | ) |
Total unrealized loss in earning | | — |
|
Ending balance | | $ | — |
|
We estimated the fair value of the make-whole premiums as the difference between the estimated value of our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility with and without the make-whole premiums. Since there was no current observable market for valuing the make-whole premiums, we determined the value using a scenario analysis that incorporated the settlement alternatives available to the debt holders in connection with the make-whole premiums. The scenario analysis valuation model combined expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions and estimated of the probability of each scenario occurring. The fair value of our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility without the make-whole premiums was estimated using a present value model. The present value model combined expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions regarding available interest rates, credit spread relative to our credit rating, and liquidity. Our analysis was premised on the assumption that the holder would act in a manner that maximizes the potential return, or “payoff,” at any given point in time. Included in this premise was the
assumption that the holder would compare the potential return associated with each available alternative, including, as specified in the terms of the contract, holding the debt instrument. As a component of this, we incorporated a market participant consideration as to our capacity to fulfill the contractual obligations associated with each alternative, including our ability to fulfill any cash settlement obligation associated with payment of the make-whole premiums, as well as the our ability to refinance our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility.
Through June 30, 2010, we estimated the fair value of the make-whole premiums to have nominal fair value. During the third quarter of 2010, due to our improved financial condition and favorable credit market conditions, we entered into formal negotiations with the administrative agent, who was also the primary lender, regarding repurchasing our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility. In addition, unlike a consolidated excess cash flow offer in April 2010 (as provided in the
F-25 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
documentation for our 2008 credit facility) that was fully accepted and allowed us to prepay, without premium, specified amounts, holders did not fully accept our consolidated excess cash flow offer in July 2010, indicating our ability to continue to repay debt at par was no longer likely. We also determined that we could obtain financing at acceptable terms, which along with our existing cash on hand, would be sufficient to repurchase our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility including any amounts due pursuant to the make-whole premiums. Based upon these factors and our valuation analysis, our prior senior secured first lien credit facility and our prior senior secured second lien credit facility make-whole premiums were estimated to have a fair value of $60,000 as of September 30, 2010 and had a nominal fair value as of December 31, 2009. This value was increased in the fourth quarter of 2010 to $91,686 to reflect the actual value that was ultimately paid in December 2010.
Although management believed its valuation methods were appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could have resulted in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The carrying amounts of our capital leases approximate fair value of these obligations based upon management’s best estimates of interest rates that would be available for similar debt obligations at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012. We believe the fair value of our debt at December 31, 20122013 was approximately the same as its carrying amount as market conditions, including available interest rates, credit spread relative to our credit rating, and illiquidity, remain relatively unchanged from the issuance date of our debt on July 29, 2011February 11, 2013 for a similar debt instrument.
Note 8. Common Stock
Net Operating Loss Rights Agreement
On June 7, 2012, we entered into a Tax Benefits Preservation Plan ("Preservation Plan") designed to preserve stockholder value and tax assets. Our ability to use our tax attributes to offset tax on U.S. taxable income would be substantially limited if there were an "ownership change" as defined under Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. In general, an ownership change would occur if one or more "5-percent shareholders," as defined under Section 382, collectively increase their ownership in us by more than 50 percent over a rolling three-year period.
In connection with the adoption of the Preservation Plan, our board of directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The preferred share purchase rights were distributed to stockholders of record as of June 18, 2012, as well as to holders of the Company's common stock issued after that date, but will only be activated if certain triggering events under the Preservation Plan occur.
Under the Preservation Plan, preferred share purchase rights will work to impose significant dilution upon any person or group which acquires beneficial ownership of 4.9% or more of the outstanding
F-23 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
common stock, without the approval of our board of directors, from and after June 7, 2012. Stockholders that own 4.9% or more of the outstanding common stock as of the opening of business on June 7, 2012, will not trigger the preferred share purchase rights so long as they
do not (i) acquire additional shares of common stock or (ii) fall under 4.9% ownership of common stock and then re-acquire shares that in the aggregate equal 4.9% or more of the common stock.
The Preservation Plan willwas scheduled to expire no later than the close of business June 7, 2013, unless extended by our board of directors. Any extension would beOn April 4, 2013, our board of directors determined to extend the Preservation Plan through June 7, 2015, subject to approvalratification of the extension by stockholders at the Vonage 2013 annual meeting.meeting of stockholders. On June 6, 2013, at the Vonage 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders ratified the extension of the Preservation Plan through June 7, 2015.
Common Stock Warrant
On April 17, 2002, Vonage’s principal stockholder and Chairman received a warrant to purchase 514 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share that would have expired on June
20, 2012. As a result of the issuance of our prior Convertible Notes, the exercise price was reduced to $0.58. At the time the warrant was exercised during the first quarter of 2011, we determined that the aggregate fair value of the warrant was $1,847, which was an increase in value of $950 from the fair value of the warrant as of December 31, 2010. This change in fair value was recorded as expense within other income (expense), net in 2011. The aggregate fair value of the warrant was reclassified to additional paid-in capital at the time of exercise. In addition, we received proceeds of $298 in connection with the exercise of the warrant.
Common Stock Repurchases
On July 25, 2012, our board of directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50,000 of Vonage common stock through December 31, 2013. The specific timing and amount of repurchases would vary based on available capital resources and other financial and operational performance, market conditions, securities law limitations, and other factors. The repurchases would be made using our cash resources.
We repurchased the following shares of common stock with cash resources under the $50,000 repurchase program as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 (1) |
| Shares of common stock repurchased | 2,189 |
| | 12,247 |
|
| Value of common stock repurchased | $ | 5,374 |
| | $ | 27,944 |
|
(1) including 278 shares, or $638, of common stock repurchases settled in January 2013; excluding commission of $163.
On February 7, 2013, Vonage's Boardour board of Directorsdirectors discontinued this sharethe remainder of our existing $50,000 repurchase program effective at the close of business on February 12, 2013 with $16,682$16,682 of availability remaining, and authorized a new program to repurchase up to $100,000$100,000 of the Company's outstanding sharesVonage common stock by December 31, 2014. The specific timing
and amount of repurchases will vary based on available capital resources and other financial and operational performance, market conditions, securities law limitations, and other factors. The repurchases will be made using our cash resources. The $100,000 repurchase program may be commenced, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
We repurchased the following shares of common stock with cash resources under the $100,000 repurchase program for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended | | For the year ended |
| | December 31, 2013* |
| Shares of common stock repurchased | 3,468 |
| | 16,954 |
|
| Value of common stock repurchased | $ | 11,514 |
| | $ | 50,653 |
|
* including 220 shares, or $734, of common stock repurchases settled in January 2014; excluding commission of $2.
As of December 31, 2013, approximately $49,347 remained of our $100,000 repurchase program. The repurchase program expires on December 31, 2014 but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.
In any period under either repurchase program, cash used in financing activities related to common stock repurchasedrepurchases may differ from the comparable change in stockholders' equity, reflecting timing differences between the recognition of share repurchase transactions and their settlement for cash.
Stock Option Cancellation
We repurchasedAs part of our strategy to build shareholder value and to facilitate our goal of reducing the followingnumber of shares of common stock asoutstanding, on February 19, 2013, we entered into an agreement with our Chief Executive Officer to cancel a total of December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Quarter Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2012 (1) | | December 31, 2012 (2) | | Total |
| Shares of common stock repurchased | 4,090 |
| | 8,157 |
| | 12,247 |
|
| Value of common stock repurchased | $ | 9,055 |
| | $ | 18,889 |
| | $ | 27,944 |
|
(1) including 3074,500 shares, orof his vested stock options for $7005,463,. The payment reflects a discount, in favor of the Company, from the closing price of the common stock repurchases settled in October 2012; excluding commission of $82.
(2) including 278 shares, or $638, of common stock repurchases settled in January 2013; excluding commission of $163.on the New York Stock Exchange on February 19, 2013.
We repurchased all shares with cash resources. As of December 31, 2012, approximately $22,056 remained of our $50,000 repurchase program that we announced on July 25, 2012. The repurchase program was to expire on December 31, 2013, subject to suspension or discontinuation at any time without notice.
Common Stock Warrant
On April 17, 2002, Vonage’s principal stockholder and Chairman received a warrant to purchase 514 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share that would have expired on June 20, 2012. As a result of the issuance of our prior Convertible Notes, the
F-26 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
exercise price was reduced to $0.58. At the time the warrant was exercised during the first quarter of 2011, we determined that the aggregate fair value of the warrant was $1,847, which was an increase in value of $950 from the fair value of the warrant as of December 31, 2010. This change in fair value was recorded as expense within other
income (expense), net in 2011. The aggregate fair value of the warrant was reclassified to additional paid-in capital at the time of exercise. In addition, we received proceeds of $298 in connection with the exercise of the warrant.
Note 9. Employee Benefit Plans
Share-Based Compensation
F-24 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Our stock option program is a long-term retention program that is intended to attract, retain and provide incentives for talented employees, officers and directors, and to align stockholder and employee interests. Currently, we grant options from our 2006 Incentive Plan. Our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan was terminated by our board of directors in 2008. As such, share-based awards are no longer granted
under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the 2006 Incentive Plan,
share-based awards can be granted to all employees, including executive officers, outside consultants, and non-employee directors. Vesting periods for share-based awards are generally four years for both plans. Awards granted under each plan expire in five or ten years from the effective date of grant. As of April 2010, the Company began routinely granting awards with a ten year expiration period.
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to value options are as follows:
| | | | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.94-1.36% |
| | 0.56-1.52% |
| | 0.99-2.89% |
| 1.13-2.02% |
| | 0.94-1.36% |
| | 0.56-1.52% |
|
| Expected stock price volatility | 90.37-93.57% |
| | 94.94-98.74% |
| | 100.05-106.55% |
| 86.94-90.39% |
| | 90.37-93.57% |
| | 94.94-98.74% |
|
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % |
| Expected life (in years) | 6.25 |
| | 3.75-6.25 |
| | 3.75-6.25 |
| 6.25 |
| | 6.25 |
| | 3.75-6.25 |
|
Beginning January 1, 2006, we estimated the volatility of our stock using historical volatility of comparable public companies in accordance with guidance in FASB ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Beginning in the first quarter of 2008, we used the historical volatility of our common stock to measure expected volatility for future option grants.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding, which we derive based on our historical settlement experience.
Our stock incentive plans as of December 31, 20122013 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Shares Authorized |
| | Shares Available for Grant |
| | Stock Options Outstanding |
| | Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
| Shares Authorized |
| | Shares Available for Grant |
| | Stock Options Outstanding |
| | Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
|
| 2001 Incentive Plan | — |
| | — |
| | 3,751 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 3,230 |
| | — |
|
| 2006 Incentive Plan | 66,400 |
| | 12,279 |
| | 36,489 |
| | 3,343 |
| 77,400 |
| | 19,452 |
| | 29,607 |
| | 5,182 |
|
| Total as of December 31, 2012 | 66,400 |
| | 12,279 |
| | 40,240 |
| | 3,343 |
| |
| Total as of December 31, 2013 | | 77,400 |
| | 19,452 |
| | 32,837 |
| | 5,182 |
|
F-25 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2001 Stock Incentive Plan
In February 2001, we adopted the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, which is an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of MIN-X.COM, INC. There have not been any options available for future grant under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan since our board of directors terminated the plan in 2008.
2006 Incentive Plan
In May 2006 we adopted the 2006 Incentive Plan. The 2006 Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance stock, performance units, annual awards, and other awards based on, or related to, shares of our common stock. Options awarded under our 2006 Incentive Plan may be non-statutory stock options or may qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our 2006 Incentive Plan contains various limits with respect to the types of awards, as follows:
a maximum of 20,000 shares may be issued under the plan pursuant to incentive stock options;
a maximum of 10,000 shares may be issued pursuant to options and stock appreciation rights granted to any participant in a calendar year;
a maximum of $5,000 may be paid pursuant to annual awards granted to any participant in a calendar year; and
a maximum of $10,000 may be paid (in the case of awards denominated in cash) and a maximum of 10,000 shares may be issued (in the case of awards denominated in shares) pursuant to awards, other than options, stock appreciation rights or annual awards, granted to any participant in a calendar year.
Based upon a June 2010 amendmentand June 2013 amendments to the plan, the maximum number of shares of our common stock that are authorized for issuance under our 2006 Incentive Plan is 66,40077,400 shares. Shares issued under the plan may be authorized and unissued shares or may be issued shares that we have reacquired. Shares covered by awards that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise expire without having been exercised or settled, or that are settled by cash or other non-share consideration, will become available for issuance pursuant to a new award. Shares that are tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price of an award or to satisfy tax withholding obligations will not be available for issuance pursuant to new awards. At December 31, 20122013, 12,27919,452 shares were available for future grant under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
The following table summarizes the activity for all awards under both of our stock incentive plans:
F-27F-26 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the activity for all awards under both of our stock incentive plans:
| | | Stock Options Outstanding | | | Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Outstanding | | Stock Options Outstanding | | | Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Outstanding | |
| Number of Shares |
| | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share |
| | Number of Shares |
| | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value Per Share |
| Number of Shares |
| | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share |
| | Number of Shares |
| | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value Per Share |
|
| | (in thousands) | | | | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | | | (in thousands) | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2009 | 28,534 |
| | $ | 2.68 |
| | 2,786 |
| | $ | 1.86 |
| |
| Stock options granted | 11,205 |
| | 1.47 |
| | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | (1,040 | ) | | 1.57 |
| | | | | |
| Stock options canceled | (2,970 | ) | | 3.53 |
| | | | | |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units granted | | | | | 1,199 |
| | 1.52 |
| |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units exercised | | | | | (1,150 | ) | | 2.38 |
| |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units canceled | | | | | (503 | ) | | 1.55 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2010 | 35,729 |
| | 2.26 |
| | 2,332 |
| | 1.50 |
| 35,729 |
| | $ | 2.26 |
| | 2,332 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
|
| Stock options granted | 6,217 |
| | 4.44 |
| | | | | 6,217 |
| | 4.44 |
| | | | |
| Stock options exercised | (2,894 | ) | | 1.47 |
| | | | | (2,894 | ) | | 1.47 |
| | | | |
| Stock options canceled | (1,770 | ) | | 5.85 |
| | | | | (1,770 | ) | | 5.85 |
| | | | |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units granted | | | | | 1,198 |
| | 4.38 |
| | | | | 1,198 |
| | 4.38 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units exercised | | | | | (995 | ) | | 1.83 |
| | | | | (995 | ) | | 1.83 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units canceled | | | | | (260 | ) | | 2.27 |
| | | | | (260 | ) | | 2.27 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | 37,282 |
| | 2.51 |
| | 2,275 |
| | 2.79 |
| 37,282 |
| | 2.51 |
| | 2,275 |
| | 2.79 |
|
| Stock options granted | 8,701 |
| | 2.22 |
| | | | | 8,701 |
| | 2.22 |
| | | | |
| Stock options exercised | (1,237 | ) | | 1.39 |
| | | | | (1,237 | ) | | 1.39 |
| | | | |
| Stock options canceled | (4,506 | ) | | 3.99 |
| | | | | (4,506 | ) | | 3.99 |
| | | | |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units granted | | | | | 2,400 |
| | 2.29 |
| | | | | 2,400 |
| | 2.29 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units exercised | | | | | (1,022 | ) | | 2.31 |
| | | | | (1,022 | ) | | 2.31 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units canceled | | | | | (310 | ) | | 2.58 |
| | | | | (310 | ) | | 2.58 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2012-stock options | 40,240 |
| | $ | 2.32 |
| | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2012-Restricted stock and restricted stock units | | | | | 3,343 |
| | $ | 2.59 |
| |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2012 | 23,478 |
| | $ | 2.30 |
| | | | | |
| Unvested shares at December 31, 2011 | 18,122 |
| | $ | 2.35 |
| | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | | 40,240 |
| | 2.32 |
| | 3,343 |
| | 2.59 |
|
| Stock options granted | | 9,315 |
| | 2.89 |
| | | | |
| Stock options exercised | | (7,842 | ) | | 1.47 |
| | | | |
| Stock options canceled | | (8,876 | ) | | 2.14 |
| | | | |
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units granted | | | | | | 3,896 |
| | 3.01 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units exercised | | | | | | (1,549 | ) | | 2.48 |
|
| Restricted stocks and restricted stock units canceled | | | | | | (508 | ) | | 2.84 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2013-stock options | | 32,837 |
| | $ | 2.73 |
| | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2013-Restricted stock and restricted stock units | | | | | | 5,182 |
| | $ | 2.92 |
|
| Exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | 15,789 |
| | $ | 2.74 |
| | | | |
| Unvested shares at December 31, 2012 | 16,762 |
| | $ | 2.34 |
| | | | | 16,762 |
| | $ | 2.34 |
| | | | |
| Unvested shares at December 31, 2013 | | 17,048 |
| | $ | 2.71 |
| | | | |
The weighted average exercise price of options granted was $2.222.89, $4.442.22, and $1.474.44 for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair market value of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted was $2.293.01, $4.382.29, and $1.524.38 during the year ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 was $1,0429,891, $8,4501,042, and $8518,450, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised restricted stock and restricted stock units for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 was $2,2503,788, $3,9542,250, and $2,1423,954, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair market value of stock options granted was $1.582.16, $1.651.58, and $1.351.65 for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011.
Total share-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011 was $11,97517,843, $14,27911,975, and $8,25514,279, respectively, which were recorded to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations.income. The 2012 expense included a reversal of executive stock compensation expense of $1,200. As of December 31, 20122013, total unamortized share-based compensation was $15,95122,102, net of estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be amortized over the remaining vesting period of each grant, up to the next 48 months. Compensation costs for all share-based awards are recognized using the ratable single-option approach on an accrual basis and are amortized using an accelerated amortization schedule. Our current policy is to issue new shares to settle the exercise of stock options and prospectively, the vesting of restricted stock units.
F-28F-27 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Information regarding the options outstanding as of December 31, 20122013 is summarized below:
| | | | Stock Options Outstanding | | Stock Options Exercisable | Stock Options Outstanding | | Stock Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Prices | Stock Options Outstanding |
| | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | Stock Options Vested and Exercisable |
| | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| Stock Options Outstanding |
| | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | Stock Options Vested and Exercisable |
| | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|
| | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) |
| $0.33 to $1.43 | 20,332 |
| | | | 1.31 |
| | | | 15,014 |
| | | | 1.32 |
| | | 9,187 |
| | | | 1.34 |
| | | | 7,917 |
| | | | 1.34 |
| | |
| $1.44 to $1.99 | 4,747 |
| | | | 1.84 |
| | | | 4,474 |
| | | | 1.85 |
| | | 2,381 |
| | | | 1.75 |
| | | | 2,231 |
| | | | 1.76 |
| | |
| $2.00 to $4.00 | 9,594 |
| | | | 2.30 |
| | | | 1,214 |
| | | | 2.46 |
| | | 16,742 |
| | | | 2.61 |
| | | | 2,502 |
| | | | 2.37 |
| | |
| $4.01 to $7.34 | 4,145 |
| | | | 4.72 |
| | | | 1,354 |
| | | | 4.90 |
| | | 3,340 |
| | | | 4.73 |
| | | | 1,952 |
| | | | 4.80 |
| | |
| $7.35 to $35.00 | 1,422 |
| | | | 11.50 |
| | | | 1,422 |
| | | | 11.50 |
| | | 1,187 |
| | | | 11.45 |
| | | | 1,187 |
| | | | 11.45 |
| | |
| | 40,240 |
| | 6.3 | | 2.32 |
| | $ | 25,294 |
| | 23,478 |
| | 4.9 | | 2.30 |
| | $ | 18,231 |
| 32,837 |
| | 6.8 | | 2.73 |
| | $ | 33,994 |
| | 15,789 |
| | 4.8 | | 2.74 |
| | $ | 22,527 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units outstanding was $7,9239,552 as of December 31, 20122013.
Retirement Plan
In March 2001, we established a 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) available to employees who meet the plan’s eligibility
requirements. Participants may elect to contribute a percentage of their compensation to the Retirement Plan up to a statutory limit. We may make a contribution to the Retirement Plan in the form of a matching contribution. The employer matching contribution is 50% of each employee’s contributions not to exceed $6 in 20102011, 20112012, and 20122013. Our expense related to the Retirement Plan was $2,1602,554, $2,1142,160, and $1,6152,114 in 20122013, 20112012, and 20102011, respectively.
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital Leases
Assets financed under capital lease agreements are included in property and equipment in the consolidated balance sheet and related depreciation and amortization expense is included in the consolidated statements of operations.
On March 24, 2005, we entered into a lease for our headquarters in Holmdel, New Jersey. We took possession of a portion of the office space at the inception of the lease, another portion on August 1, 2005 and took over the remainder of the office space in early 2006. The overall lease term is twelve years and five months. In connection with the lease, we issued a letter of credit which requires $7,350 of cash as collateral, which is classified as restricted cash. Part
of the cash was released, leaving a balance of $5,3004,306 at December 31, 20122013.The. The gross amount of the building recorded under capital
leases totaled $25,709 as of December 31, 20122013 and accumulated depreciation was approximately $15,44917,647 as of December 31, 20122013.
Operating Leases
We have entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for certain of our existing office and telecommunications co-location space in the United States and for international subsidiaries with original lease periods expiring between 20132014 and 2015. We are committed to pay a portion of the buildings’ operating expenses as determined under the agreements.
F-29 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
At December 31, 20122013, future payments under capital leases and minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows over each of the next five years and thereafter:
| | | December 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2013 | |
| Capital Leases |
| | Operating Leases |
| Capital Leases |
| | Operating Leases |
|
| 2013 | $ | 4,284 |
| | $ | 5,455 |
| |
| 2014 | 4,369 |
| | 2,850 |
| $ | 4,369 |
| | $ | 5,854 |
|
| 2015 | 4,457 |
| | 1,682 |
| 4,457 |
| | 1,694 |
|
| 2016 | 4,545 |
| | — |
| 4,545 |
| | — |
|
| 2017 | 3,071 |
| | — |
| 3,071 |
| | — |
|
| 2018 | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total minimum payments required | 20,726 |
| | $ | 9,987 |
| 16,442 |
| | $ | 7,548 |
|
| Less amounts representing interest | (5,165 | ) | | | (3,352 | ) | | |
| Minimum future payments of principal | 15,561 |
| | | 13,090 |
| | |
| Current portion | 2,471 |
| | | 2,889 |
| | |
| Long-term portion | $ | 13,090 |
| | | $ | 10,201 |
| | |
F-28 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Rent expense was$6,071 for 2013, $4,995 for 2012, and $4,642 for 2011, and $4,552 for 2010.
Stand-by Letters of Credit
We have stand-by letters of credit totaling $5,5584,306 and $6,8365,558, as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012, respectively.
End-User Commitments
We are obligated to provide telephone services to our registered end-users. The costs related to the potential utilization of minutes sold are expensed as incurred. Our obligation to provide this service is dependent on the proper functioning of systems controlled by third-party service providers. We do not have a contractual service relationship with some of these providers.
Vendor Commitments
We have several commitments primarily commitments to vendors who will provide voice termination services, provide voicemail to text transcription services, provide local inbound services, process our credit card billings, provide E-911 services to our customers, assist us with local number portability, license patents to us, sell us communication devices, sell us data center equipment, lease us collocation facilities, and provide carrier operation and telephone related services, provide marketing services, and provide in-store assisted sales labor.energy supply. In certain cases, we may terminate these arrangements early upon payment of specified fees. These commitments total $63,590228,667. Of this total amount, we expect to purchase $49,810 in 2013, $8,05595,129 in 2014, $4,65890,825 in 2015, $80042,446 in 2016, and $267 in 2017, respectively. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. We also purchase products and services as needed with no firm commitment. For this reason, the amounts presented do not provide a reliable indicator of our expected future cash outflows or changes in our expected cash position.
Litigation
IP Matters
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. On February 22, 2011, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek”) filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage's products and services are covered by
United States Patent No. 7,889,722, entitled “System for Interconnecting Standard Telephony Communications Equipment to Internet Protocol Networks” (the “722 Patent”). The suit also named numerous other defendants, including Verizon Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Time-Warner Cable, Inc., AT&T, Inc., and T-Mobile USA Inc. On August 17, 2011, the Court dismissed Bear Creek's case against the Vonage entities, as well as all the other defendants, except for one defendant. Later, on August 17, 2011, Bear Creek re-filed its complaint concerning the '722 Patent in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the same Vonage entities. In its Delaware complaint, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage is infringing one or more claims of the '722 Patent. In addition, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage is contributing to and inducing infringement of one or more claims of the '722 Patent. On September 28, 2011, Vonage filed a motion to dismiss Bear Creek's claims for induced, contributory, and willful infringement, which was denied on September 27, 2012. On January 25, 2012, Bear Creek filed a motion with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer and consolidate its litigation against Vonage with thirteen separate actions Bear Creek filed in the U.S. District Courts for Delaware and the Eastern District of Virginia. On May 2, 2012, the Multidistrict Litigation Panel granted Bear Creek's motion and ordered the coordination or consolidation for pretrial proceedings of all fourteen actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On October 11, 2012, Vonage filed an answer to Bear Creek's complaint, including counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of the '722 patent. On November 5, 2012, Bear Creek filed an answer to Vonage's counterclaims. On January 22, 2013, the Court set a conference in the case for March 19, 2013, for the purpose of discussing case management including setting a case schedule.
On March 8, 2012, a third-party requested the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") to reexamine the validity of the asserted '722 Patent. The USPTO granted the request on April 26, 2012, and subsequently issued an initial Office Action rejecting all of the '722 Patent claims. After reconsideration based on statements made by the patentee, however, the USPTO on September 19, 2012, reversed its initial rejection, and confirmed all claims as patentable over the references cited in the reexamination request. A second request for reexamination of the '722 Patent was filed on September 12, 2012, by Cisco Systems, Inc., challenging the validity of the '722 Patent. Cisco's request was granted by the USPTO on November 28, 2012. No Office Action in this reexamination has been issued by the USPTO. A third request for reexamination of the '722 Patent was filed on September 14, 2012, and the USPTO denied this request on December 6, 2012.
OpinionLab, Inc. On July 18, 2012, OpinionLab, Inc. (“OpinionLab”) filed a lawsuit against IPerceptions, Inc. and IPerceptions US, Inc. (“IPerceptions”) alleging claims of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and
F-30 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
tortious interference with business expectancy. On August 16, 2012, OpinionLab filed an amended complaint, adding Vonage Marketing LLC and Vonage Holdings Corp. as defendants, and alleging that Vonage's products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,421,724, 6,606,581, 6,928,392, 7,085,820, 7,370,285, 8,024,668, and 8,041,805. OpinionLab alleged direct, indirect and willful infringement against Vonage. IPerceptions, the supplier to Vonage of the accused product in this lawsuit, has agreed to fully indemnify and defend Vonage in this lawsuit. On September 11, 2012, IPerceptions and Vonage each moved to dismiss OpinionLab's indirect and willful patent infringement claims. The motions were denied on November 8, 2012. Vonage answered the complaint on December 7, 2012. The court has scheduled a status hearing for February 19, 2013.
From time to time, in addition to those identified above,below, we are subject to legal proceedings, claims, investigations, and proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third-party patents and other intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. From time to time, we also receive letters or other communications from third parties inviting us to obtain patent licenses that might be relevant to our business or alleging that our services infringe upon third party patents or other intellectual property. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions, if any, are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. We believe that we have valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending against us and are vigorously defending these matters. Given the uncertainty surrounding litigation and our inability to assess the likelihood of a favorable or unfavorable outcome in the above noted matters and our inability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss or range of loss, it is possible that the resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
IP Matters
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. On February 22, 2011, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek”) filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., Vonage Marketing LLC, and
Aptela Inc. (a subsidiary of Vocalocity, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company which was acquired on November 15, 2013 pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 9, 2013) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s and Aptela’s products and services are covered by United States Patent No. 7,889,722, entitled “System for Interconnecting Standard Telephony Communications Equipment to Internet Protocol Networks” (the “722 Patent”). The suit also named numerous other defendants, including Verizon Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Time-Warner Cable, Inc., AT&T, Inc., and T-Mobile USA Inc. On August 17, 2011, the Court dismissed Bear Creek’s case against the Vonage entities and Aptela, as well as all the other defendants, except for one defendant. Later, on August 17, 2011, Bear Creek re-filed its complaint concerning the ‘722 Patent in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the same Vonage entities; and also re-filed a separate complaint concerning the ‘722 Patent in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Aptela. In each complaint, Bear Creek alleges that Vonage and Aptela, respectively, are infringing one or more claims of the ‘722 Patent. In addition, Bear Creek alleges that each party is contributing to and inducing infringement of one or more claims of the ‘722 Patent. On January 25, 2012, Bear Creek filed a motion with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to transfer and consolidate its litigations against Vonage and Aptela with twelve other separate actions Bear Creek filed in the U.S. District Courts for Delaware and the Eastern District of Virginia. On May 2, 2012, the Multidistrict Litigation Panel granted Bear Creek’s motion and ordered the coordination or consolidation for pretrial proceedings of all fourteen actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On October 11, 2012, Vonage filed an answer to Bear Creek’s complaint, including counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘722 patent. Aptela, which filed a motion to dismiss Bear Creek’s complaint on September 27, 2011, has not yet answered, as its motion remains pending and awaiting disposition by the court. On November 5, 2012, Bear Creek filed an answer to Vonage’s counterclaims. On March 1, 2013, several defendants including Vonage moved the Court to stay the case pending resolution of the reexamination of the ‘722 patent requested by Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) as described below; the motion was granted on July 17, 2013, and the case is now stayed pending the resolution of the reexamination. On November 8, 2013, the Court granted Bear Creek’s request to terminate and substitute counsel representing it in the litigation.
On March 8, 2012, a third-party requested the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) to reexamine the validity of the asserted ‘722 Patent. The USPTO granted the request on April 26, 2012, and subsequently issued an initial Office Action rejecting all of the ‘722 Patent claims. After reconsideration based on statements made by the patentee, the USPTO on September 19, 2012, reversed its initial rejection, and confirmed all claims as patentable over the references cited in the reexamination request. A second request for reexamination of the ‘722 Patent was filed on September 12, 2012, by Cisco, challenging the validity of the ‘722 Patent. Cisco’s request was granted by the USPTO on November 28, 2012. On March 26, 2013, the USPTO issued an Office Action rejecting all claims of the ‘722 patent as invalid. Bear Creek responded to the Office Action on May 28, 2013, requesting withdrawal of the USPTO’s rejection. Cisco responded to Bear Creek’s submission on June 26, 2013. A third request for reexamination of the ‘722 Patent was filed on September 14, 2012, and the USPTO denied this request on December 6, 2012.
OpinionLab, Inc. On July 18, 2012, OpinionLab, Inc. (“OpinionLab”) filed a lawsuit against IPerceptions, Inc. and IPerceptions US, Inc. (collectively, “IPerceptions”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) alleging claims of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and tortious interference with business expectancy. On August 16, 2012, OpinionLab filed an amended complaint, adding Vonage
F-29 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Marketing LLC and Vonage Holdings Corp. as defendants, and alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,421,724, 6,606,581, 6,928,392, 7,085,820, 7,370,285, 8,024,668, and 8,041,805. OpinionLab alleged direct, indirect and willful infringement by Vonage. IPerceptions, the supplier to Vonage of the accused product in this lawsuit, has agreed to fully defend and indemnify Vonage in this lawsuit. On September 11, 2012, IPerceptions and Vonage each moved to dismiss OpinionLab’s indirect and willful patent infringement claims. The motions were denied on November 8, 2012. Vonage answered the complaint on December 7, 2012. On July 11, 2013, the Court issued an order setting the case schedule. On September 6, 2013, OpinionLab filed a second amended complaint, which was answered by defendants on September 23, 2013. On October 14, 2013, OpinionLab made an unopposed motion to consolidate the case for pre-trial purposes with Case No. 13-CV-1574, OpinionLab, Inc. v Qualtrics Labs, Inc., currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The motion was granted October 17, 2013.
RPost Holdings, Inc. On August 24, 2012, RPost Holdings, Inc., RPost Communications Limited, and RMail Limited (collectively, “RPost”) filed a lawsuit against StrongMail Systems, Inc. (“StrongMail”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) alleging that StrongMail’s products and services, including its electronic mail marketing services, are covered by United States Patent Nos. 8,224,913, 8,209,389, 8,161,104, 7,966,372, and 6,182,219. On January 16, 2013, StrongMail moved the Court to transfer the venue of the lawsuit to the Northern District of California. That motion was denied by the Court on August 19, 2013. On February 11, 2013, RPost filed an amended complaint, adding 27 new defendants, including Vonage America Inc. RPost’s amended complaint alleges willful infringement of the RPost patents by Vonage and each of the other new defendants because they are customers of StrongMail. StrongMail has agreed to fully defend and indemnify Vonage in this lawsuit. Vonage answered the complaint on May 7, 2013. On January 30, 2014, RPost informed the Court that it is ready for a scheduling conference; the Court has not yet scheduled a conference.
Straight Path IP Group Inc. On November 4, 2013, Straight Path IP Group Inc. (“Straight Path”), a subsidiary of Straight Path Communications Inc., filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent Nos. 6,009,469, 6,131,121, 6,513,066, and 6,701,365. Straight Path alleged direct and indirect infringement by Vonage. On December 20, 2013, Vonage moved to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey and that motion was granted by the court on January 17, 2014. On December 30, 2013, Vonage answered the complaint and filed a motion to dismiss Straight Path’s claims for induced and contributory infringement. In response, Straight Path amended its complaint on January 7, 2014. On February 7, 2014, Vonage answered the amended complaint and moved to dismiss Straight Path's claims for indirect infringement.
Previously, on August 2, 2013, Straight Path filed a lawsuit against Vocalocity, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) alleging that Vocalocity’s products and services are covered by the ‘066 and ‘365 patents. Straight Path alleged direct and indirect infringement by Vocalocity. On September 11, 2013, the lawsuit was ordered consolidated with two other lawsuits by Straight Path filed in early August 2013 against Bandwidth.com, Inc. and Telesphere Networks Ltd., relating to the same patents. On October 15, 2013, Vocalocity moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On October 18, 2013, Straight Path filed an amended complaint. Vocalocity answered the amended complaint on November 4, 2013, and asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity against both patents. Straight Path answered the counterclaims on November 20,
2013. The parties submitted opening and response claim construction briefs on December 13, 2013 and December 20, 2013, respectively. A Markman hearing was held on January 16, 2014. The parties await the Court's claim construction order.On November 13, 2013, the Court approved the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan under which discovery shall conclude on February 14, 2014, and a final pretrial conference shall be held on February 20, 2014.
AIP Acquisition LLC. On January 3, 2014, AIP Acquisition LLC (“AIP”), filed a lawsuit against Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc., and Vonage Marketing LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Norfolk Division) alleging that Vonage’s products and services are covered by United States Patent No. 7,269,247. Vonage's answer is due February 26, 2014.
Commercial Litigation
Merkin & Smith, et als. On September 27, 2013, Arthur Merkin and James Smith filed a putative class action lawsuit against Vonage America, Inc. in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, alleging that Vonage violated California’s Unfair Competition Law by charging its customers fictitious 911 taxes and fees. On October 30, 2013, Vonage filed a notice removing the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On October 30, 2013 the case was assigned to a United States District Judge and a Magistrate Judge, with the parties directed to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program. On November 26, 2013, Vonage filed its Answer to the Complaint. On December 4, 2013, Vonage filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration. A hearing was held on January 27, 2014, and on February 4, 2014, the Court denied Vonage’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. Vonage has 30 days to file a notice of appeal of the Court’s decision, if it decides to do so.
Regulation
Telephony services are subject to a broad spectrum of state and federal regulations. Because of the uncertainty over whether Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) should be treated as a telecommunications or information service, we have been involved in a substantial amount of state and federal regulatory activity. Implementation and interpretation of the existing laws and regulations is ongoing and is subject to litigation by various federal and state agencies and courts. Due to the uncertainty over the regulatory classification of VoIP service, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to new regulations or existing regulations under new interpretations, and that such change would not introduce material additional costs to our business.
Federal - CALEA
On August 5, 2005, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) released an Order extending the obligations of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) to interconnected VoIP providers. Under CALEA, telecommunications carriers must assist law enforcement in executing electronic surveillance, which includes the capability to provide call content and call-identifying information to a local enforcement agency, or LEA, pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization.
The FCC required all interconnected VoIP providers to become fully CALEA compliant by May 14, 2007. Vonage has tested with a federal law enforcement agency and implemented a trusted third party CALEA solution to meet this requirement. We could be subject to an enforcement action in the future in the event the government took the position that we were not in compliance with CALEA.
Federal - Local Number Portability
On May 13, 2009, the FCC adopted an order that reduced to one business day the amount of time that an interconnected VoIP provider such as us have to port a telephone number to another provider. If we, or third parties we rely upon for porting, have difficulty executing the one-day porting requirement, we could be subject to FCC enforcement action.
Federal - Net Neutrality
Clear and enforceable net neutrality rules would make it more difficult for broadband Internet service providers to block or discriminate against Vonage service. Also explicitly applying net neutrality rules to wireless broadband Internet service could create greater opportunities for VoIP applications that run on wireless broadband Internet service. In October 2009, the FCC proposed the adoption of enforceable net neutrality rules for both wired and wireless broadband Internet service providers. The proposed rules would prohibit wired and wireless broadband Internet service providers from blocking or hindering lawful content, applications, or services and from unreasonably discriminating when transmitting lawful network traffic. In addition, broadband Internet service providers would have to publicly disclose certain information about their network management practices. In December 2010, the FCC adopted enforceable net neutrality rules based on its October 2009 proposal. All of the proposed rules in the October 2009 proposal applied to wired broadband Internet providers. The FCC applied some but not all of the proposed rules to wireless broadband service. Wireless broadband Internet services providers are prohibited from blocking or
F-30 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
hindering voice or video applications that compete with the broadband Internet service provider's voice or video services. Wireless providers are also subject to transparency requirements, but they are not subject to the prohibition on unreasonable discrimination that applies to wired broadband Internet services providers. Final rules were filed in the Federal Register in September 2011. Shortly thereafter, a number of parties filed appeals of the rules in various federal circuit courts; some alleging that the FCC lacks authority to apply net neutrality rules to broadband service providers and some alleging that the rules did not go far enough. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals was selected by lottery to decide the appeals and the appeals alleging that the rules did not go far enough were dropped. The appeals alleging thatD.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on the appeal on September 9, 2013. On January 14, 2014, the D.C. Circuit vacated the anti-blocking and the unreasonable discrimination provisions of the rules. The D.C. Circuit decision did not foreclose the FCC lacks authority to applyfrom adopting anti-blocking or non-discrimination rules and the rules are pending.FCC may revisit these issues or appeal the ruling.
Federal - Intercarrier Compensation
On February 9, 2011, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on reforming universal service and the intercarrier compensation (“ICC”) system that governs payments between telecommunications carriers primarily for terminating traffic. In particular, the FCC indicated that it has never determined the ICC obligations for VoIP service and sought comment on a number of proposals for how VoIP should be treated in the ICC system. The FCC's adoption of an ICC proposal will impact Vonage's costs for telecommunications services. On October 27, 2011, the FCC adopted an order reforming universal service and ICC. The FCC order provides that VoIP originated calls will be subject to interstate access charges for long distance calls and reciprocal compensation for local calls that terminate to the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”). It also subjected PSTN originated traffic directed to VoIP subscribers to similar ICC obligations. The termination charges for all traffic, including VoIP originated traffic, will transition over several years to a bill and keep arrangement (i.e., no termination charges). Numerous parties filed appeals of the FCC order in multiple federal circuit courts of appeal. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals was selected by lottery to decide the appeals. The appeals are pending.
Federal - Universal Service Contribution Reform
On April 30, 2012, the FCC released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on reforming federal universal service fund
F-31 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(“USF”) contributions. Currently USF contributions are assessed on the interstate and international revenue of traditional telephone carriers and interconnected VoIP providers like Vonage. The level of USF assessments on these providers has been going up over time because of decreases in the revenue subject to assessment due to substitution of non-assessable services such as non-interconnected VoIP services. If the FCC does reform USF contributions, it is likely that Vonage's contribution burden will decline.
Federal - Rural Call Completion Issues
On February 7, 2013, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on rural call completion issues. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposed new detailed reporting requirements to gauge rural call completion performance. Rural carriers have argued that VoIP provider call completion performance to rural areas is generally poor. On October 28, 2013, the FCC adopted an order on rural call completion that imposes new reporting obligations and restricts certain call signaling practices. The call signaling rules went into effect on January 31, 2014. On January 17, 2014, we filed for an extension from January 31, 2014 to March 3, 2014 to implement the call signaling rules. On January 30, 2014, the FCC granted our requested extension. We could be subject to an FCC enforcement action in the future in the event the FCC took the position that our rural call completion performance is inadequate or we were not compliant with the FCC’s order.
Federal - Numbering Rights
On April 18, 2013, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposing to modify FCC rules to allow VoIP providers to directly access telephone numbers. In addition, the FCC granted a waiver from its existing rules to allow Vonage to conduct a trial of direct access to telephone numbers. The trial would allow the FCC to obtain real-world data on direct access to telephone numbers by VoIP providers to inform consideration of the NPRM. Direct access to telephone numbers would facilitate IP to IP interconnection, which may allow VoIP providers to provide higher quality, lower cost services, promote the deployment of innovative new voice services, and experience reductions in the cost of telephony services. Vonage successfully completed the trial in certain markets and filed the required reports on the trial with the FCC. On January 31, 2014, the FCC Wireline Competition Bureau issued a positive report on the trial, concluding that Vonage's successful trial confirmed the technical feasibility of interconnected VoIP providers obtaining telephone numbers directly from the numbering administrators. The NPRM provides for a 30-day comment period on this report. Given the positive report, at the end of this comment period, the FCC may adopt its proposed rule to allow VoIP providers to directly access telephone numbers.
Pakistan Termination Rate Increase
On October 1, 2012, Pakistani carriers formed the International Clearing House (ICH). This cartel subsequently took action to increase the cost to terminate international calls to Pakistan by approximately 500 percent . As a result of the implementation of higher termination costs, Vonage was forced to remove Pakistan from unlimited calling in its Vonage World plan. Vonage filed a petition at the FCC, shortly after the ICH rates became effective, seeking an order prohibiting U.S. carriers from paying the new higher ICH rates. On March 5, 2013, the FCC issued an order that prohibits U.S. carriers from paying more than the prevailing termination rate prior to the implementation of the ICH rates. In addition to the Vonage challenge in the U.S., a Pakistani carrier challenged the ICH action under Pakistani competition law. After the trial court found that the ICH violated Pakistani competition law, the Supreme Court of Pakistan overturned the trial court decision and remanded the case to the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP). On April 30, 2013, the CCP issued an order that holds that the ICH violates Pakistani competition law. On May 9, 2013, the Sindh High Court temporarily suspended the CCP order while the court considers constitutional challenges to the order made by several Pakistani carriers. Despite favorable action by both U.S. and Pakistani authorities, it is currently unclear if or how long it will take for international termination rates in Pakistan to return to a more competitive level.
State Telecommunications Regulation
In general, the focus of interconnected VoIP telecommunications regulation is at the federal level. On November 12, 2004, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling providing that our service is subject to federal regulation and preempted the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission from imposing certain of its regulations on us. The FCC's decision was based on its conclusion that our service is interstate in nature and cannot be separated into interstate and intrastate components. On March 21, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit affirmed the FCC's declaratory ruling preempting state regulation of our service. The 8th Circuit found that it is impossible for us to separate our interstate traffic from our intrastate traffic because of the nomadic nature of the service. As a result, the 8th Circuit held that it was reasonable for the FCC to preempt state regulation of our service. The 8th Circuit was clear, however, that the preemptive effect of the FCC's declaratory ruling may be reexamined if technological advances allow for the separation of interstate and intrastate components of the nomadic VoIP service. Therefore, the preemption of state authority over our service under this ruling generally hinges on the inability to separate the interstate and intrastate components of the service.
F-31 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
While this ruling does not exempt us from all state oversight of our service, it effectively prevents state telecommunications regulators from imposing certain burdensome and inconsistent market entry requirements and certain other state utility rules and regulations on our service. State regulators continue to probe the limits of federal preemption in their attempts to apply state telecommunications regulation to interconnected VoIP service. On July 16, 2009, the Nebraska Public Service Commission and the Kansas Corporation Commission filed a petition with the FCC seeking a declaratory ruling or, alternatively, adoption of a rule declaring that state authorities may apply universal service funding requirements to nomadic VoIP providers. We participated in the FCC proceedings on the petition. On November 5, 2010, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling that allowed states to assess state USF on nomadic VoIP providers on a going forward basis provided that the states comply with certain conditions to ensure that imposing state USF does not conflict with federal law or policy. We expect that state public utility commissions and state
legislators will continue their attempts to apply state telecommunications regulations to nomadic VoIP service.
State and Municipal Taxes
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we make a provision for a liability for taxes when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability or range of liability can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. For a period of time, we did not collect or remit state or municipal taxes (such as sales, excise, utility, use, and ad valorem taxes), fees or surcharges (“Taxes”) on the charges to our customers for our services, except that we historically complied
with the New Jersey sales tax. We have received inquiries or demands from a number of state and municipal taxing and 911 agencies seeking payment of Taxes that are applied to or collected from customers of providers of traditional public switched telephone network services. Although we have consistently maintained that these Taxes do not apply to our service for a variety of reasons depending on the statute or rule that establishes such obligations, we are now collecting and remitting sales taxes in certain of those states including a number of states that have changed their statutes to expressly include VoIP. In addition, many states address how VoIP providers should contribute to support public safety agencies, and in those states we remit fees to the appropriate state agencies. We could also be contacted by state or municipal taxing and 911 agencies regarding Taxes that do explicitly apply to VoIP and these agencies could seek retroactive payment of Taxes. As such, we have a reserve of $1,5144,630 as of December 31, 20122013 as our best estimate of the potential tax exposure for any retroactive assessment. We believe the maximum estimated exposure for retroactive assessments is approximately $4,0007,000 as of December 31, 20122013.
Employment Agreements
Our Chief Executive Officer is subject to an employment contract with a minimum salary commitment that is subject to annual review. He is also eligible for an annual performance bonus with a target based upon his then annual salary. The term of the employment contract with our Chief Executive Officer expires in 20132014 but is subject to one-year renewals unless prior notice of 90 days is provided by either party. In the event of the termination of our Chief Executive Officer’s employment, depending upon the circumstances, he will be entitled to severance payments up to an amount equal to a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination, two year’s base salary, and amounts to cover specified health care coverage premiums and outplacement services.
Note 11. Acquisition of Business
Acquisition of Vocalocity
Vocalocity is an industry-leading provider of cloud-based communication services to small and medium businesses (SMB). The acquisition of Vocalocity immediately positions Vonage as a leader in the SMB hosted VoIP market. SMB and small office, home office (SOHO) services previously offered by Vonage will now be offered under the Vonage Business Solutions brand on the Vocalocity platform.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement dated October 9, 2013, by and among Vocalocity and the Merger Sub, Vonage, and the Shareholder Representative, on November 15, 2013, Merger Sub merged with and into Vocalocity, and Vocalocity became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vonage. In addition, at the effective time of the Merger all previously unexercised vested Vocalocity stock options that were not out-of-the-money were cashed out at the spread between the applicable exercise price and the applicable merger consideration, subject to reductions for escrow deposits. Unvested and/or out-of the-money Vocalocity stock options were cancelled and terminated with no right to receive payment. Immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, options to purchase common stock held by certain persons were accelerated, such that they are fully vested and exercisable as of the Effective Time.
We acquired Vocalocity for $134,167, including 7,983 shares of Vonage common stock (which shares had an aggregate value of approximately $26,186 based upon the closing stock price on November 15, 2013) and cash consideration of $107,981 including payment of $2,869 for excess cash as of closing date, subject to adjustments for closing cash and working capital of Vocalocity, reductions for
indebtedness and transaction expenses of Vocalocity that remained unpaid as of closing, and deposits into the escrow funds, pursuant to the Merger Agreement. We financed the transaction with $32,981 of cash and $75,000 from our revolving credit facility. The aggregate consideration will be allocated among holders of: (i) Vocalocity preferred stock, (ii) Vocalocity common stock, (iii) vested options to purchase Vocalocity common stock, and (iv) warrants to purchase Vocalocity preferred stock.
Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, $9,710 of the cash consideration and $2,357 of the stock consideration was placed in escrow (the "Holdback") for unknown liabilities that may have existed as of the acquisition date. The Holdback, which was included as part of the acquisition consideration, will be paid for such unknown liabilities or to the former Vocalocity shareholders within 18 months from the closing date of the Acquisition.
During 2013, we incurred $2,768 in acquisition related transaction and integration costs, which were recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting under which assets and liabilities of Vocalocity were recorded at their respective fair values including an amount for goodwill representing the difference between the acquisition consideration and the fair value of the identifiable net assets.
The acquisition price was allocated to the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the closing date of the Acquisition. The fair values assigned to tangible and
F-32 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates and assumptions. The estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are considered preliminary and are based on the most recent information available. We believe that the information provides a reasonable basis for assigning the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, but we are waiting for
additional information, primarily related to income, sales, excise, and ad valorem taxes which are subject to change. Thus the provisional measurements of fair value set forth below are subject to change. We expect to finalize the valuation as soon as practicable, but not later than one-year from the acquisition date.
The table below summarizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of November 15, 2013 as follows:
|
| | | |
| | Estimated Fair Value |
| Assets | |
| Current assets: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,924 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance | 275 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 787 |
|
| Total current assets | 8,986 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 1,777 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 75,000 |
|
| Other assets | 53 |
|
| Total assets acquired | 85,816 |
|
| | |
| Liabilities | |
| Current liabilities: | |
| Accounts payable | 2,226 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 7,064 |
|
| Deferred revenue, current portion | 1,986 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 11,276 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities, net, non-current | 24,000 |
|
| Total liabilities assumed | 35,276 |
|
| Net identifiable assets acquired | 50,540 |
|
| Goodwill | 83,627 |
|
| Total purchase price | $ | 134,167 |
|
The intangible assets as of the closing date of the Acquisition included:
|
| | | |
| Amount |
|
| Customer relationship | $ | 39,100 |
|
| Developed technologies | 35,200 |
|
| Trade names | 500 |
|
| Non-compete agreements | 200 |
|
| | $ | 75,000 |
|
Indications of fair value of the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Acquisition were determined using either the income, market or replacement cost methodologies. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods which reflect the pattern in which economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized. The customer relationships and developed technology are being amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated useful life of ten years; trade names are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years; and the non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over two years.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the amount of goodwill resulting from the Acquisition. We do not expect any
portion of this goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill attributable to the Acquisition has been recorded as a non-current asset and is not amortized, but is subject to an annual review for impairment. We believe the factors that contributed to goodwill include synergies that are specific to our consolidated business, the acquisition of a talented workforce that provides us expertise in small and medium business market as well as other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition.
The results of operations of the Vocalocity business and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been included in our consolidated financial statements since the date of the Acquisition.
F-33 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma financial information (unaudited)
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma information presents the combined historical results of operations of Vonage and Vocalocity for the years 2013 and 2012, as if the Acquisition had been completed at the beginning of 2012.
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
|
| Revenue | $ | 883,026 |
| | $ | 893,654 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage | 24,532 |
| | 25,224 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage per share - basic | 0.11 |
| | 0.11 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage per share - diluted | 0.11 |
| | 0.10 |
|
The pro forma financial information includes adjustments to reflect one time charges and amortization of fair value adjustments in the appropriate pro forma periods as though the companies were combined as of the beginning of 2012. These adjustments include:
| |
| > | an increase in amortization expense of $13,152 and $15,664 for the years ended 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the fair value of acquired identifiable intangible assets; |
| |
| > | a decrease in income tax expense of $3,384 and $7,599 for the years ended 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to pro forma adjustments and Vocalocity's results prior to acquisition; |
| |
| > | the exclusion of Vocalocity and our transaction-related expenses of $6,947 for the year ended 2013; |
| |
| > | an increase in interest expense of $2,255 and $2,725 for the years ended 2013 and 2012, respectively associated with revolving line of credit and adjustment to interest rate on existing loans as a result of increase in Vonage leverage ratio which changes interest rate tier. |
As the Company has begun to integrate the combined operations, eliminating overlapping processes and expenses and integrating its products and sales efforts with those of Vocalocity, it is impractical to determine the revenues and earnings specific to Vocalocity since the date of the Acquisition.
Note 12. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
In the third quarter of 2013, we formed a consolidated foreign subsidiary in Brazil in connection with our previously announced joint venture in Brazil, creating a redeemable noncontrolling interest. The redeemable noncontrolling interest consists of the 30.0% interest in this subsidiary held by our joint venture partner.
Pursuant to the stockholder agreement governing the joint venture, we have the right to purchase this noncontrolling interest (“call right”) from the joint venture partner and our joint venture partner has the right to sell the noncontrolling interest (“put right”) to us subject to certain triggering events. The amounts at which the call right can be exercised are based on appraised value as prescribed by the stockholder agreement, subject to certain adjustments ranging from 50% to 150%, multiplied by the noncontrolling interest holder’s percentage ownership of the subsidiary that is subject to the triggering event. The amounts at which the put right can be exercised are based on appraised value as prescribed by the stockholder agreement, subject to certain adjustments ranging from 50% to 120%, multiplied by the noncontrolling interest holder’s percentage ownership of the subsidiary that is subject to the triggering event. We adjust the redeemable noncontrolling interest to the redemption values at the end of each reporting period should it become probable that the noncontrolling interest will be redeemable. At that time the changes in the noncontrolling interest will be recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings, as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
On December 3, 2013, we extended a loan of $545 to our consolidated foreign subsidiary in Brazil pursuant to the shareholder agreement to meet the capital call requirement of our joint venture partner. The loan bore interest at a rate equal to 105% of rate of the Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia (SELIC) (“SELIC Rate”).
In February 2014, pursuant to the shareholder agreement, we notified our joint venture partner that we are exercising our dilution rights as our joint venture partner did not meet a second successive capital call on December 17, 2013. As such, the loan that was provided in December will be converted to equity and we will make the second missed capital call of $503. As a result, our ownership interest is expected to be 91%.
We have provided our joint venture partner with a one-time opportunity to repurchase their diluted equity by making the first capital call in 2014 in addition to the two missed capital calls. The price to be paid by our joint venture partner in order to repurchase their diluted equity shall be equal to (i) the loan principal amount adjusted from its disbursement date until the date of the repurchase, at a rate equal to 105% of the rate of the SELIC Rate pro rata; plus (ii) $503, adjusted from December 17, 2013 to the date of the repurchase, at a rate equal to 107% of the SELIC Rate pro rata (iii) their share of joint venture losses for diluted equity from the dilution date through the repurchase date.
F-34 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2013
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 11.13. Geographic Information
Our chief operating decision-makers review financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and marketing expenses by
geographic region for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.
Accordingly, we consider ourselves to be in a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.
Information about our operations by geographic location is as follows: | | | December 31, | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| 2012 |
| | 2011 |
| | 2010 |
| 2013 |
| | 2012 |
| | 2011 |
|
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 804,870 |
| | $ | 825,928 |
| | $ | 842,758 |
| $ | 784,665 |
| | $ | 804,870 |
| | $ | 825,928 |
|
| Canada | 32,570 |
| | 32,135 |
| | 30,748 |
| 32,348 |
| | 32,570 |
| | 32,135 |
|
| United Kingdom | 11,674 |
| | 12,260 |
| | 11,536 |
| 12,054 |
| | 11,674 |
| | 12,260 |
|
| | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| | $ | 885,042 |
| $ | 829,067 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
|
| December 31, 2012 |
| | December 31, 2011 |
| | | December 31, 2013 |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| | |
| Long-lived assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 85,331 |
| | $ | 121,036 |
| | | $ | 231,335 |
| | $ | 85,331 |
| | |
| Canada | — |
| | 3 |
| | | |
| Brazil | | 845 |
| | — |
| | |
| United Kingdom | 1,032 |
| | 1,246 |
| | | 821 |
| | 1,032 |
| | |
| Israel | 411 |
| | 410 |
| | | 276 |
| | 411 |
| | |
| | $ | 86,774 |
| | $ | 122,695 |
| | | $ | 233,277 |
| | $ | 86,774 |
| | |
F-32 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2012
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 12.14. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth the reviewed consolidated quarterly financial information for 20122013 and 20112012:
| | | For the Quarter Ended | | | For the Quarter Ended | | |
| March 31, |
| | June 30, |
| | September 30, |
| | December 31, |
| | Total |
| March 31, |
| | June 30, |
| | September 30, |
| | December 31, |
| | Total |
|
| Year Ended 2013 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | | $ | 209,087 |
| | $ | 204,776 |
| | $ | 203,984 |
| | $ | 211,220 |
| | $ | 829,067 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage | | 13,047 |
| | 7,447 |
| | 4,207 |
| | 3,588 |
| | 28,289 |
|
| Net income attributable to Vonage per common share: | | Net income attributable to Vonage per common share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | 0.06 |
| | 0.04 |
| | 0.02 |
| | 0.02 |
| |
|
|
| Diluted | | 0.06 |
| | 0.03 |
| | 0.02 |
| | 0.02 |
| |
|
|
| Year Ended 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 215,903 |
| | $ | 211,916 |
| | $ | 207,584 |
| | $ | 213,711 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
| $ | 215,903 |
| | $ | 211,916 |
| | $ | 207,584 |
| | $ | 213,711 |
| | $ | 849,114 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 13,921 |
| | (3,340 | ) | (2 | ) | 13,213 |
| | 12,833 |
| | 36,627 |
| 13,921 |
| | (3,340 | ) | (1 | ) | 13,213 |
| | 12,833 |
| | 36,627 |
|
| Net income (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 0.06 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | 0.06 |
| |
|
| 0.06 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | 0.06 |
| |
|
|
| Diluted | 0.06 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | 0.06 |
| |
|
| 0.06 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | 0.06 |
| |
|
|
| Year Ended 2011 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | $ | 219,841 |
| | $ | 218,285 |
| | $ | 216,507 |
| | $ | 215,690 |
| | $ | 870,323 |
| |
| Net income | 21,113 |
| | 21,748 |
| | 16,037 |
| | 350,146 |
| (1 | ) | 409,044 |
| |
| Net income per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 0.10 |
| | 0.10 |
| | 0.07 |
| | 1.55 |
| |
|
| |
| Diluted | 0.09 |
| | 0.09 |
| | 0.07 |
| | 1.48 |
| |
|
| |
| |
| (1) | In the fourth quarter of 2011, we released $325,601 of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our net deferred tax assets resulting in a one-time non-cash benefit.
|
| |
(2) | In the second quarter of 2012, we wrote-off of our investment in the Amdocs system, net of settlement amounts to the Company of $25,262. |
F-33F-35 VONAGE ANNUAL REPORT 20122013
