UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
x
☒          ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-33409
tmus-20191231_g1.jpg
T-MOBILE US, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWAREDelaware20-0836269
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, Washington98006-1350
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(425) 378-4000

12920 SE 38th Street
Bellevue,Washington
(Address of principal executive offices)
98006-1350
(Zip Code)
(425)378-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Classeach classTrading SymbolName of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value $0.00001 per shareTMUSThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, $0.00001 par value per shareThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large“large accelerated filer, accelerated” “accelerated filer, and smaller” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer     x                            Accelerated filer         ¨
Non-accelerated filer     ¨ (Do
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not check if a smaller reporting company)         Smaller reporting company     ¨to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).                Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2016,28, 2019, the aggregate market value of the registrant’svoting and non-voting common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $12.4$23.2 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.NASDAQ Global Select Market. As of February 8, 2017,January 31, 2020, there were 826,525,821856,932,845 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporateswill be incorporated by reference from certain portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’sRegistrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which definitive Proxy Statement shallwill be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal yearpursuant to whichRegulation 14A or will be included in an amendment to this Report relates.Report.




T-Mobile US, Inc.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 20162019


Table of Contents








Table of Contents






Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements


This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including information concerning our future results of operations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The following important factors, along with the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, could affect future results and cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:


the failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, regulatory approval for the merger (the “Merger”) with Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”), pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement with Sprint and other parties therein (as amended, the “Business Combination Agreement”) and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”), risks associated with the actions and conditions we have agreed to in connection with regulatory approval for the Transactions, and the risk that such regulatory approval may result in the imposition of additional conditions that, if accepted by the parties, could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the Transactions, or the failure to satisfy any of the other conditions to the Transactions on a timely basis or at all;
the risk that the antitrust litigation related to the Transactions brought by the attorneys general of certain states and the District of Columbia will result in an order preventing the completion of the Transactions and the risk of other litigation or regulatory actions related to the Transactions;
the exercise by one or both parties of a right to terminate the Business Combination Agreement;
adverse effects on the market price of our common stock or on our operating results because of a failure to complete the Merger in the anticipated timeframe, on the anticipated terms or at all;
inability to obtain the financing contemplated to be obtained in connection with the Transactions on the expected terms or timing or at all;
the ability of us, Sprint and the combined company to make payments on debt or to repay existing or future indebtedness when due or to comply with the covenants contained therein;
adverse changes in the ratings of our or Sprint’s debt securities or adverse conditions in the credit markets;
negative effects of the announcement, pendency or consummation of the Transactions on the market price of our common stock and on our or Sprint’s operating results, including as a result of changes in key customer, supplier, employee or other business relationships;
the assumption of significant liabilities in connection with, and significant costs related to, the Transactions, including liabilities of Sprint that may become liabilities of the combined company or that may otherwise arise and financing costs;
failure to realize the expected benefits and synergies of the Transactions in the expected timeframes, in part or at all;
costs or difficulties related to the integration of Sprint’s network and operations into our network and operations, including intellectual property and communications systems, administrative and information technology infrastructure and accounting, financial reporting and internal control systems;
differences with Sprint’s control environments, cultures, and auditor expectations may result in future material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, and/or control deficiencies while we work to integrate the companies and align guidelines and practices;
costs or difficulties related to the completion of the Divestiture Transaction and the satisfaction of the Government Commitments (each as defined below);
the inability of us, Sprint or the combined company to retain and hire key personnel;
the risk that certain contractual restrictions contained in the Business Combination Agreement during the pendency of the Transactions could adversely affect our or Sprint’s ability to pursue business opportunities or strategic transactions;
adverse economic, political or politicalmarket conditions in the U.S. and international markets;
competition, industry consolidation, and changes in the market for wireless services, market, including new competitors entering the industry as technologies converge;which could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain customers;
the effects of any future merger, investment, or acquisition involving us, as well as the effects of mergers, investments, or acquisitions in the technology, media and telecommunications industry;
3

Table of Contents
challenges in implementing our business strategies or funding our wireless operations, including payment for additional spectrum or network upgrades;
the possibility that we may be unable to renew our spectrum licenses on attractive terms or acquire new spectrum licenses at reasonable costs and terms;
difficulties in managing growth in wireless data services, including network quality;
material changes in available technology;technology and the effects of such changes, including product substitutions and deployment costs and performance;
the timing, scope and financial impact of our deployment of advanced network and business technologies;
the impact on our networks and business from major technology equipment failures;
inability to implement and maintain effective cyber security measures over critical business systems;
breaches of our and/or our third partythird-party vendors’ networks, information technology (“IT”) and data security;security, resulting in unauthorized access to customer confidential information;
natural disasters, terrorist attacks or similar incidents;
unfavorable outcomes of existing or future litigation;
any changes in the regulatory environments in which we operate, including any increase in restrictions on the ability to operate our networks;networks and changes in data privacy laws;
any disruption or failure of our third parties’ or key suppliers’ provisioning of products or services;
material adverse changes in labor matters, including labor campaigns, negotiations or additional organizing activity, and any resulting financial, operational and/or reputational impact;
the ability to make payments on our debt or to repay our existing indebtedness when due;
adverse change in the ratings of our debt securities or adverse conditions in the credit markets;
changes in accounting assumptions that regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), may require, which could result in an impact on earnings; and,
changes in tax laws, regulations and existing standards and the resolution of disputes with any taxing jurisdictions.jurisdictions;

the possibility that the reset process under our trademark license results in changes to the royalty rates for our trademarks;
the possibility that we may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or be accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of others;
our business, investor confidence in our financial results and stock price may be adversely affected if our internal controls are not effective;
the occurrence of high fraud rates related to device financing, credit cards, dealers, or subscriptions; and
interests of our majority stockholder may differ from the interests of other stockholders.

Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. In this Form 10-K, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “T-Mobile,” “T-Mobile US,” “our Company,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to T-Mobile US, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.


Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website, press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. We intend to also use certain social media accounts as means of disclosing information about us and our services and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD (the @TMobileIR Twitter account (https://twitter.com/TMobileIR) and through April 30, 2020, the @JohnLegere Twitter (https://twitter.com/JohnLegere), Facebook and Periscope accounts, which Mr. Legere also uses as means for personal communications and observations, and on and after May 1, 2020 the @SievertMike Twitter (https://twitter.com/SievertMike) account, which Mr. Sievert also uses as a means for personal communications and observations). The information we post through these social media channels may be deemed material. Accordingly, investors should monitor these social media channels in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The social media channels that we intend to use as a means of disclosing the information described above may be updated from time to time as listed on our investor relations website.







4

Table of Contents

PART I.


Item 1. Business


Business Overview and Strategy


Un-carrier Strategy

We are the Un-carrier. Through our Un-carrier®. Un-satisfied with strategy, we have disrupted the status quo. Un-afraid to innovate. T-Mobile is the fastest growing wireless company in the U.S. based on customer growth in 2016. T-Mobile provides wireless communications services industry, by actively engaging with and listening to our customers and eliminating their existing pain points, including voice, messagingproviding them with added value, an exceptional experience and implementing signature Un-carrier initiatives that have changed wireless for good. We ended annual service contracts, overages, unpredictable international roaming fees, data to more than 71buckets and so much more. We are inspired by a relentless customer experience focus, consistently leading the wireless industry in customer care by delivering an excellent customer experience with our “Team of Experts,” which drives our record-high customer satisfaction levels while enabling operational efficiencies. Since the launch of the Un-carrier in 2013, approximately 53 million customers have joined the Un-carrier movement, and we will continue forward with our customer experience focus, determined to bring the Un-carrier to every potential customer in the postpaid, prepaidUnited States.

Our network is the foundation of our success and wholesale markets. The Un-carrier strategyeverything we do is an approach that seeks to listen to the customer, address their pain points, bring innovation to the industry and improve the wireless experience for all. In practice, this means offeringpowered by our customers a great service on a nationwide 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network, offering devices whenwhich covers 327 million Americans (99% of the U.S. population) and how our customers want them, and providing plans that are simple, affordable and without unnecessary restrictions. Going forward, we willrecently launched nationwide 5G network. We continue to listen and respond to our customers, refineexpand the footprint and improve the Un-carrier strategyquality of our network, providing outstanding wireless experiences for customers who will not have to compromise on quality and value. Going forward, it is this network that will allow us to deliver new, innovative products and services with the best valuesame customer experience focus and industry-disrupting mentality that has redefined the wireless communications services industry in the industry.United States in the customers’ favor.



History


T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1994 as VoiceStream Wireless PCS (“VoiceStream”), a subsidiary of Western Wireless Corporation (“Western Wireless”). VoiceStream was spun off from Western Wireless in 1999, acquired by Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”DT”) in 2001 and renamed T-Mobile USA, Inc. in 2002.


In 2013, T-Mobile US, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed through the business combination betweenof T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (“MetroPCS”). The business combination was accounted for as a reverse acquisition with T-Mobile USA as the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, T-Mobile USA’s historical financial statements became the historical financial statements of the combined company.


OurProposed Sprint Transactions

On April 29, 2018, we entered into the Business Combination Agreement with Sprint to merge in an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. If the Merger closes, the combined company will be named “T-Mobile,” and as a result of the Merger, is expected to be able to build upon our 5.50% mandatory convertible preferred stock, Series A (“preferred stock”) trade onrecently launched foundational 5G network of 600 MHz spectrum to deliver transformational broad, deep and nationwide 5G for all, accelerate innovation and increase competition in the NASDAQ Global Select MarketU.S. wireless, video and broadband industries. If the Merger closes, we expect to be able to combine Sprint’s 2.5 GHz mid-band spectrum with our foundational layer of 5G and millimeter-wave spectrum, completing the “layer cake” of spectrum and providing customers with an unmatched 5G experience at lower prices.

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) underconsummation of the symbols “TMUS”Merger remains subject to certain closing conditions, as well as pending judicial and “TMUSP,” respectively.regulatory proceedings. We expect the Merger will be permitted to close in early 2020. For more information regarding our Business Combination Agreement, see Note 2 – Business Combinations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Business Strategy


We provide wireless services to 86.0 million postpaid, prepaid and wholesale customers and generate revenue by offeringproviding affordable wireless communicationcommunications services to our postpaid, prepaid and wholesalethese customers, as well as a wide selection of wireless devices and accessories. Our most significant expenses are relatedrelate to acquiring and retaining high-quality customers, providing a full range of devices, compensating employees, and operating and expanding our network. We provide service, devices and accessories across our flagship brands, T-Mobile and MetroPCS,Metro by T-Mobile, through our owned and operated retail stores, third party distributors andas well as through our
5

Table of Contents
websites (www.T-Mobile.com and www.MetroPCS.com).www.metrobyt-mobile.com), T-Mobile app and customer care channels. In addition, we sell devices to dealers and other third-party distributors for resale through independent third-party retail outlets and a variety of third-party websites. The information on our websites is not part of this Form 10-K.

We continue to aggressively pursue our strategy, which includes the following elements:

Un-carrier Strategy

We introduced our Un-carrier strategy in 2013 and continue to aggressively focus on addressing customer pain points with the launch of additional signature moves. Un-carrier initiatives have included, but are not limited to, offering the following to qualifying customers:

providing customers with affordable rate plans while eliminating annual service contracts;
allowing customers easier options to upgrade their eligible devices when they want;
reimbursing qualifying customers’ early termination fees and/or remaining phone payments when they switch from other carriers and trade-in their phones;
allowing customers to stream music without it counting against their high speed data allotment;
providing Wi-Fi calling and texting for customers with capable smartphones;
giving qualified customers the ability to roll-over up to 20 GB per year of their unused high-speed data automatically each month;
providing reduced United States to international calling rates, and providing messaging and data roaming while traveling abroad at no extra charge;
allowing customers to access coverage and calling, as well as 4G LTE data, across the U.S., Mexico and Canada at no extra charge;
providing select video streaming services without it counting against their high speed data allotment on qualifying plans;
offering eligible new (through December 31, 2016) or existing (as of June 6, 2016) customers ownership in the Company with a free share of T-Mobile stock or an additional share of T-Mobile stock for every new active account each customer refers through December 31, 2016, subject to a maximum of 100 shares in a calendar year;
enabling eligible customers who download the T-Mobile Tuesday app to be informed about and to redeem products and services offered by participating business partners each Tuesday;
offering eligible customers a full hour of free in-flight Wi-Fi on their smartphone on all Gogo-equipped domestic flights;
giving our customers one simple rate plan, T-Mobile ONE™, that includes unlimited calls, unlimited text and unlimited high-speed 4G LTE data on their device; and

beginning in 2017, with our introduction of Un-carrier Next, T-Mobile ONE includes:

monthly wireless service fees and taxes in the advertised monthly recurring charge;
paying participating customers back for data that is not used in a month if they use less than 2GB high-speed data/month; and
giving customers the first-ever price guarantee on an unlimited 4G LTE plan and allowing our customers to keep their T-Mobile ONE price until they decide to change it.

Customer Experience

The ongoing success of our Un-carrier strategy and continued transformation of the network has strengthened T-Mobile’s position as a provider of dependable high-speed 4G LTE service. Additionally, we have continued to focus on retaining customers by delivering an improved wireless customer experience.  Branded postpaid phone churn improved to 1.30% in 2016, compared to 1.39% in 2015 and 1.58% in 2014. On September 1, 2016, we sold our marketing and distribution rights to certain existing T-Mobile co-branded customers to a current Mobile Virtual Network Operators (“MVNO”) partner for nominal consideration. The impact of this transaction resulted in improvements to branded postpaid phone churn for the year ended December 31, 2016. See Performance Measures of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation of this Form 10-KOperations for information regarding this transaction. Our branded postpaid net customer additions remained strong with 4.1 million in 2016, compared to 4.5 million in 2015 and 4.9 million in 2014, primarily driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives, ongoing improvements to network quality, and promotions for services and devices. In addition, we continue to buildout our Extended Range LTE, which operates on our low-band 700 MHz A-Block spectrum. These results reinforce our position as an organization with a strong focus and commitment to providing an outstanding customer experience.additional information.

Aligned Cost Structure

We continue to pursue a low-cost business operating model to drive cost savings, which can then be reinvested in the business. These cost-reduction programs are on-going as we continue to simplify our business and drive operational efficiencies and cost savings in areas, such as network optimization, customer roaming and customer service. A portion of these savings have been, and will continue to be, reinvested into growth of our business.


Customers


We provide wireless communicationcommunications services to three primary categories of customers:


Branded postpaid customers generally include customers thatwho are qualified to pay after usingreceiving wireless communication services;communications services utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS or other connected devices which includes tablets and SyncUp DRIVE™;
Branded prepaid customers generally include customers who pay for wireless communicationcommunications services in advance. Our branded prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and MetroPCS;Metro by T-Mobile; and
Wholesale customers include Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and MVNOMobile Virtual Network Operator (“MVNO”) customers that operate on our network but are managed by wholesale partners.


We generate the majority of our service revenues by providing wireless communicationcommunications services to branded postpaid and branded prepaid customers. Our ability to acquire and retain branded postpaid and prepaid customers is important to our business in the generation of service revenues, equipment revenues and other revenues. In 2016,2019, our service revenues generated by providing wireless communicationcommunications services by customer category were:


65% branded67% Branded postpaid customers;
31% branded28% Branded prepaid customers; and
4%5% Wholesale customers and Roaming and other services.

Starting with the three months ended March 31, 2020, we plan to discontinue reporting wholesale customers roaming and other services.instead focus on branded customers and wholesale revenues, which we consider more relevant than the number of wholesale customers given the expansion of M2M and Internet of Things (“IoT”) products.


All of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were earned in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Services and Products


We provide wireless communicationcommunications services through a variety of service plan options. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including smartphones, wearables, tablets and other mobile communication devices, which are manufactured by various suppliers. Services, devices and accessories are offered directly to consumers through our owned and operated retail stores, as

well as through our websites. In addition, we sell devices to dealers and other third party distributors for resale through independent third-party retail outlets and a variety of third-party websites.


Our primary service plan offerings,offering, which allowallows customers to subscribe for wireless communications services separately from the purchase of a device, include:

Our T-Mobile ONEis our signature Magenta plan (T-Mobile ONE), which was launched in September 2016 as phase 12.0 of our Un-carrier initiatives. T-Mobile ONE gives our customers(“Magenta”) and is packed with exclusive benefits, including unlimited calls, unlimitedtalk, text and unlimited high-speed 4G LTEsmartphone data on their device. Onour network, free stuff, discounts, and more every week from T-Mobile ONE, video typically streams at DVD (480p) qualityTuesdays and tethering is at maximum 3G speeds.“Team of Experts,” our dedicated customer care team. Customers canalso have the ability to choose to add on additional features to T-Mobile ONE for an additional cost. On T-Mobile ONE Pluscost on Magenta Plus.

We also offer an Essentials rate plan, for customers also receive unlimited High Definition Video Day Passes, Voicemail to Text, NameID, unlimited Gogo in-flight internet passes on capable domestic flights and up to two times faster speeds when traveling abroad in 140+ countries and destinations. On T-Mobile ONE Plus International, customers receivewho want the benefits of T-Mobile ONE Plusbasics, as well as free and reduced calling from the U.S. to foreign countries and unlimited high-speed 4G LTE mobile hotspot data in the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
In January 2017, we introduced the latest in our Un-carrier initiatives, Un-carrier Next, where monthly wireless service fees and taxes are included in the advertised monthly recurring charge for T-Mobile ONE. We also unveiled Kickback on T-Mobile ONE, where participating customers who use 2 GB or less of data in a month, will get an up to a $10 credit on their next month’s bill per qualifying line. In addition, we introduced the Un-contract for T-Mobile ONE with the first-ever price guarantee on an unlimited 4G LTE plan, which allows T-Mobile ONE customers to keep their price for service until they decide to change it.
Simple Choice plans, which were launched in 2013 as part of phase 1.0 of our Un-carrier initiatives, eliminated annual service contracts and simplified the lineup of consumerspecific rate plans to one affordable plan for unlimited voicequalifying customers, including Unlimited 55+, Military, First Responder, and messaging services with the option to add data services. On January 25, 2017, we streamlined our Simple Choice plan offerings to new customers into our T-Mobile ONE plan.Business.

Depending on their credit profile, customers are qualified either for postpaid or prepaid service.


Our device options for qualifying customers on Magenta, and previously on T-Mobile ONE and previously on Simple Choice plans, include:


Depending on their credit profile, qualifying customers who purchase a device from us have theThe option of financing all or a portion of the individual device or accessory purchase price at the time of sale over an installment period of up to 2436 or 12 months, respectively, using ouran Equipment Installment Plan ("EIP");
For qualifying customers who finance their initial device with an EIP, an option to enroll in our Just Upgrade My Phone (“EIP”JUMP!®). program to later upgrade their device; and
In addition, qualifying customers who finance their initial device with an EIP can enroll in our JUMP!® program (“JUMP!”) to later upgrade their device. Upon a qualifying JUMP! upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their used device at the time of upgrade in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.
In 2015, we introduced JUMP! On Demand. With JUMP! On Demand,The option to lease a low monthly payment covers the costdevice over a period of leasing a new deviceup to 18 months and gives qualified customers the freedom to exchangeupgrade it for a new device up to three timesone time per month with JUMP! On Demand™.

6

Table of Contents
5G

In December 2019, T-Mobile launched America’s first nationwide 5G network, including prepaid 5G with Metro by T-Mobile, covering more than 200 million people and more than 5,000 cities and towns across the United States with 5G. In addition, we introduced two new 600 MHz 5G capable superphones, the exclusive OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren and the Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G and anticipate offering an industry-leading smartphone portfolio built to work on nationwide 5G in 12 months for no extra fee. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return their device in good working condition or purchase their device.2020. This 5G network is our foundational layer of 5G coverage on 600 MHz low-band spectrum.

Network Transformation Update

We continue to increase the depth, breadthT-Mobile’s 5G network is not just bigger, it’s better. T-Mobile’s 5G is based on real, standards-based 5G and functionalitycovers more than 60% of the nation’s densest LTEpopulation across more than 1 million square miles. T-Mobile’s 5G network by adding new spectrumworks indoors and is available to increase coverage, and re-farming existing spectrum and implementing new technology to augment capacity. Collectively, these network advancements help provide improved network performance and reliability for our customers.anyone with a capable device.


Spectrum GrowthPosition


We provide mobile communicationwireless communications services utilizing mid-band spectrum licenses, such as Advanced Wireless Services (“AWS”) and Personal Communications Service (“PCS”), and low-band spectrum licenses utilizing our 600 MHz and 700 MHz A-Blockspectrum, and mmWave spectrum.


We owned or had agreements to own an average of 86111 MHz of spectrum across the top 25 markets in the U.S.nationwide as of December 31, 2016, comprised of2019, not including mmWave spectrum. The spectrum comprises an average of 1231 MHz in the 600 MHz band, 10 MHz in the 700 MHz band, 3029 MHz in the 1900 MHz PCS band and 4441 MHz in the AWS band. This is compared to an average of 85
We have cleared 600 MHz of spectrum across the top 25 markets in the U.S.covering approximately 275 million POPs as of December 31, 2015.

Over the last year, we have entered into and closed on various agreements for the acquisition and exchange of 700 MHz A-Block, AWS and PCS spectrum licenses. See Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, we intend2019 and expect to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses in private party transactions and future Federal Communications Commissions (“FCC”) spectrum license auctions, includingclear the broadcast incentive auction of low-bandremaining 600 MHz spectrum licenses that is currently in-progress.POPs in 2020.
We have continued to build outcontinue our network to concentrate our cell sites where our customers need data most. We had approximately 66,000 cell sites, including macro sites and distributed antenna system network nodes asdeployment of LTE on 600 MHz spectrum using 5G-ready equipment. As of December 31, 2016, compared2019, we were live with 4G LTE in nearly 8,900 cities and towns in 49 states and Puerto Rico covering 1.5 million square miles and 248 million POPs.
Combining 600 and 700 MHz spectrum, we have deployed 4G LTE in low-band spectrum to approximately 64,000 cell sites as316 million POPs.
Currently, more than 33 million devices on T-Mobile’s network are compatible with 600 MHz spectrum.
On June 3, 2019, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) announced the results of December 31, 2015.Auctions 101 (28 GHz spectrum) and 102 (24 GHz spectrum). In the combined auctions, T-Mobile spent $842 million to more than quadruple its nationwide average total mmWave spectrum holdings from 104 MHz to 471 MHz.
In 2015, we completedWe will evaluate future spectrum purchases in current and upcoming auctions and in the shutdownsecondary market to further augment our current spectrum position. We are not aware of any such spectrum purchase options that come close to matching the MetroPCS Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”) network. The migration of customersefficiencies and synergies possible from the MetroPCS CDMA network onto T-Mobile’s LTE and Evolved High Speed Packet Access Plus network provides faster network performance for MetroPCS customers with compatible handsets.Merger.


Network Coverage Growth


We continue to expand our coverage breadth and currently provide 4G LTE coverage to 314 million people, up from zero 4G LTE coverage four years ago. We are targeting to provide 320covered 327 million people with 4G LTE coverage by year-end 2017.as of December 31, 2019;
We own 700 MHz A-Block spectrum covering 272Our nationwide 5G network covered more than 200 million people oras of December 31, 2019; and
As of December 31, 2019, we had equipment deployed on approximately 84% of the U.S. population. The spectrum covers all of the top 10 market areas66,000 macro cell sites and 29 of the top 30 market areas in the U.S.25,000 small cell/distributed antenna system sites.
We have deployed our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum in over 500 market areas covering more than 252 million people under the name “Extended Range LTE.” We expect to continue to aggressively roll-out new 700 MHz market areas in 2017 including Chicago, Eastern Montana, and substantially all of the remaining population in 700 MHz licensed areas.


Network Capacity Growth


WeDue to industry spectrum limitations (especially in mid-band), we continue to make efforts to expand our capacity and increase the quality of our network through the re-farming of existing spectrum and implementation of new technologies including Voice over LTE ("VoLTE"(“VoLTE”), Carrier Aggregation, 4x4 MIMO,multiple-input and multiple-output (“MIMO”), 256 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation ("QAM"(“QAM”) and Licensed Assisted Access (“LAA”).


At the endVoLTE comprised 90% of total voice calls in the fourth quarter of 2016, approximately 70% of spectrum was being used for 4G LTE2019, compared to 52% at the end of87% in the fourth quarter of 2015. We expect to continue to re-farm spectrum currently committed to 2G and 3G technologies.2018.
Re-farmed spectrum enables us to continue expanding Wideband LTE, which currently covers 232 million people. Wideband LTE refers to markets that have bandwidth of at least 15+15 MHz dedicated to 4G LTE.
VoLTE currently comprises approximately 67% of total voice calls compared to 39% in December 2015. Moving voice traffic to VoLTE frees up spectrum and allows for the transition of spectrum currently used for 2G and 3G to 4G LTE. We are leading the U.S. wireless industry in terms of VoLTE migration.
Carrier aggregation is live for our customers in 674 cities. This advanced technology delivers superior speed and performance by bonding two or three discrete spectrum channels together.969 markets as of December 31, 2019, up from 923 markets as of December 31, 2018.
4x4 MIMO is currently available in more than 300 cities. This technology effectively delivers twice the speed, and incremental network capacity, to customers by doubling the number of data paths between the cell site and a customer's device.
We have rolled out 256 QAM, which increases the number of bits delivered per transmission to enable faster speed.
Innovative programs like Binge On and T-Mobile ONE also create capacity by optimizing video for mobile viewing. These programs deliver material capacity benefits to both customers and our network. Since the launch of Binge On, our customers have watched more than 4 billion hours of optimized video.

Network Speed Leadership

We continue to have the fastest nationwide 4G LTE network in the U.S. based on both download and upload speeds from millions of user-generated tests. This is the twelfth consecutive quarter that we have led the industry in both download and upload speeds.


Distribution

We had approximately 52,000 total points of distribution, including approximately 13,000 T-Mobile and MetroPCS branded locations and 39,000 third-party and national retailer locations, as well as distribution through our websites,708 markets as of December 31, 2016. 2019, up from 564 markets as of December 31, 2018.
7

Table of Contents
Our distribution density in major metropolitan areas provides customers withhave 256 QAM available across the convenienceUn-carrier's entire 4G LTE footprint.
We are the first carrier globally to have rolled out the combination of having retailcarrier aggregation, 4x4 MIMO and service locations close256 QAM. This trifecta of standards has been rolled out to where they live701 markets as of December 31, 2019, up from 549 markets as of December 31, 2018.
LAA has been deployed to 30 cities including Atlanta, Austin, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Diego, Seattle, and work.Washington DC.


Competition


The wireless telecommunicationscommunications services industry is highly competitive. We are the third largest provider of postpaid service plans and the second largest provider of prepaid service plans in the U.S. as measured by customers. Our competitors include other national carriers, such as AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), Verizon Communications, Inc. (“Verizon”) and Sprint Corporation.Sprint. AT&T and Verizon are significantly larger than uswe are and may enjoy greater resources and scale advantages as compared to us. In addition, our competitors include numerous smaller regional carriers, existing MVNOs, such asmobile virtual network operators (“MVNOs”), including TracFone Wireless, Inc., and future MVNOs, such as Comcast Corporation, and Charter Communications, Inc., and Altice USA, Inc., many of which offer or plan to offer no-contract, postpaid and prepaid service plans. Competitors also include providers who offer similar communication services, such as voice, messaging and messaging,data services, using alternative technologies or services. Competitive factors within the wireless telecommunicationscommunications services industry include pricing, market saturation, service and product offerings, customer experience, network investment and quality, development and deployment of technologies, availability of additional spectrum licenses and regulatory changes. Some competitors have shown a willingness to use aggressive pricing as a source of differentiation. Other competitors have sought to add ancillary services, like mobile video or music streaming services, to enhance their offerings. Taken together, the competitive factors we face continue to put pressure on growth and margins as companies compete to retain the current customer base and continue to add new customers.


Employees


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we employed approximately 50,00053,000 full-time and part-time employees, including network, retail, administrative and customer support functions.


Regulation


The FCC regulates many key aspects of our business, including licensing, construction, the operation and use of our network, modifications of our network, control and ownership of our licenses and authorizations, the sale, transfer and acquisition of certain licenses, domestic roaming arrangements and interconnection agreements, pursuant to its authority under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“Communications Act”). The FCC has a number of complex requirements and proceedings that affect our operations and pending proceedings regarding additional or modified requirements that could increase our costs or diminish our revenues. For example, the FCC has rules regarding provision of 911 and E-911 services, porting telephone numbers, interconnection, roaming, internet openness or net neutrality, disabilities access, privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, and the universal service and Lifeline programs. Many of these and other issues are being considered in ongoing proceedings, and we cannot predict whether or how such actions will affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to provide services and generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws and regulations. In addition, regulation of companies that offer competing services can impact our business indirectly.


WirelessExcept for operations in certain unlicensed frequency bands, wireless communications services providers generally must be licensed by the FCC to provide communications services at specified spectrum frequencies within specified geographic areas and must comply with the rules and policies governing the use of the spectrum as adopted by the FCC. The FCC issues each license for a fixed period of time, typically 1010-15 years independing on the case of cellular, PCS and point-to-point microwaveparticular licenses. AWS licenses have an initial term of 15 years, with successive 10-year terms thereafter. While the FCC has generally renewed licenses given to operating companies like us, the FCC has authority to both revoke a license for cause and to deny a license renewal if a renewal is not in the public interest. Furthermore, we could be subject to fines, forfeitures and other penalties for failure to comply with FCC regulations, even if any such non-compliance was unintentional. In extreme cases, penalties can include revocation of our licenses. The loss of any licenses, or any related fines or forfeitures, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Additionally, Congress’ and the FCC’s allocation of additional spectrum for broadband commercial mobile radio service (“CMRS”), which includes cellular, PCS, miscellaneous wireless services and specialized mobile radio, could significantly increase and intensify competition. We cannot assess the impact that any developments that may occur in the U.S. economy or any future spectrum allocations by the FCC may have on license values. FCC spectrum auctions and other market
8

Table of Contents
developments may adversely affect the market value of our licenses in the future. A significant decline in the value of our licenses could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the FCC periodically reviews its policies on how to evaluate carriers’ spectrum holdings. A change in these policies could affect spectrum resources and competition among us and other carriers.


Congress and the FCC have imposed limitations on foreign ownership of CMRS licensees that exceed 20% direct ownership or 25% indirect ownership.ownership through an entity controlling the licensee. The FCC has ruled that higher levels of indirect foreign ownership, even up to 100%, are presumptively consistent with the public interest, albeit subject to review.but must be reviewed and approved. Consistent with that established policy, the FCC has issued a declaratory ruling authorizing up to 100% ownership of our companyCompany by Deutsche Telekom.DT. This declaratory ruling, and our licenses, are conditioned on Deutsche Telekom’sDT’s and the Company’s compliance with a network security agreement with the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security. Failure to comply with the terms of this agreement could result in fines, injunctions and other penalties, including potential revocation of our spectrum licenses.


While the Communications Act generally preempts state and local governments from regulating the entry of, or the rates charged by, wireless communicationcommunications services providers, certain state and local governments regulate other terms and conditions of wireless service, including billing, termination of service arrangements and the imposition of early termination fees, advertising, network outages, the use of devices while driving, zoning and land use. Additionally, after the FCC’s adoption of the 2017 “Restoring Internet Freedom” (RIF) Order reclassifying broadband internet access services as Title I (non-common carrier services), a number of states have sought to impose state-specific net neutrality and privacy requirements on providers’ broadband services. The FCC ruling broadly preempted such state efforts, which are inconsistent with the FCC’s federal deregulatory approach. Recently, however, the DC Circuit issued a ruling largely upholding the RIF Order, but also vacating the portion of the ruling broadly preempting state/local net neutrality laws. The court left open the prospect that particular state laws could still unlawfully conflict with the FCC net neutrality rules and be preempted. A petition seeking rehearing of the decision has been filed. Court challenges to some of the state enactments also remain pending.

While most states are largely seeking to codify the repealed federal rules, there are differences in some states, notably California, which has passed separate privacy and net neutrality legislation. There are also efforts within Congress to pass federal legislation to codify uniform federal privacy and net neutrality requirements, while also ensuring the preemption of separate state requirements, including the California laws. If not rescinded, separate state requirements will impose significant business costs and could also result in increased litigation costs and enforcement risks. State authority over wireless broadband services will remain unsettled until final action by the courts or Congress.

In addition, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and other federal agencies have asserted that they have jurisdiction over some consumer protection and elimination and prevention of anticompetitive business practices with respect to the provision of non-common carrier services. Further, the FCC and the Federal Aviation Administration regulate the siting, lighting and construction of transmitter towers and antennae. Tower siting and construction are also subject to state and local zoning, as well as federal statutes regarding environmental and historic preservation. The future costs to comply with all relevant regulations are to some extent unknown and changes to regulations, or the applicability of regulations, could result in higher operating and capital expenses, or reduced revenues in the future.


Available Information


The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically at www.sec.gov. Our Form 10-K and all other reports and amendments filed with or furnished to the SEC are also publicly available free of charge on the Investor Relationsinvestor relations section of our website at investor.t-mobile.com or at www.sec.gov as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct, code of ethics for senior financial officers, code of business conduct, speak-up policy, supplier code of conduct, and charters for the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance and executive committees of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors are also posted on the Investor Relationsinvestor relations section of our website at investor.t-mobile.com. The information on our websites is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnishesfurnish to, the SEC.


Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website, press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts.  We intend to also use the @TMobileIR Twitter account (https://twitter.com/TMobileIR) and the @JohnLegere Twitter (https://twitter.com/JohnLegere), Facebook and Periscope accounts, which Mr. Legere also uses as means for personal communications and observations, as means of disclosing information about the Company and its services and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.  The information we post through these social media channels may be deemed material.  Accordingly, investors should monitor these social media channels in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts.  The social media channels that we intend to use as a means of disclosing the information described above may be updated from time to time as listed on the Company’s investor relations website.

Item 1A. Risk Factors


In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating T-Mobile. Our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results, as well as the price of our common stock and other securities, could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.

9

Table of Contents
Risks Related to Our Business and the Wireless Industry
The scarcity and cost of additional wireless spectrum, and regulations relating to spectrum use, may adversely affect our business strategy and financial performance.
We will need to acquire additional spectrum in order to continue our customer growth, expand and deepen our coverage, maintain our quality of service, meet increasing customer demands and deploy new technologies. We will be at a competitive disadvantage and possibly experience erosion in the quality of service in certain markets if we fail to gain access to necessary spectrum before reaching capacity. As a result, we are actively seeking to make additional investment in spectrum, which could be significant.

The continued interest in, and acquisition of, spectrum by existing carriers and others may reduce our ability to acquire and/or raise the cost of acquiring spectrum in the secondary market or negatively impact our ability to gain access to spectrum through other means, including government auctions. We may need to enter into spectrum sharing or leasing arrangements, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and may involve significant expenditures. Although the FCC is conducting an auction for low band spectrum, in which we are participating, gaining access to that spectrum may take up to three years or more. Any material delay could adversely impact our ability to implement our plans and efforts to improve our network. In addition, our return on investment in spectrum depends on our ability to attract additional customers and to provide additional services and usage to existing customers. As a result, the return on any investment in spectrum that we make may not be as much as we anticipate or take longer than expected. Additionally, we may be unable to secure the spectrum we need in any auction we may elect to participate in or in the secondary market, on favorable terms or at all.
The FCC may impose conditions on the use of new wireless broadband mobile spectrum, including new restrictions or rules governing the use or access to current or future spectrum. This could increase pressure on capacity. Additional conditions that may be imposed by the FCC include heightened build-out requirements, limited renewal rights, clearing obligations, or open access or net neutrality requirements that may make it less attractive or less economical to acquire spectrum. In addition, rules may be established for future government spectrum auctions that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas.
If we cannot acquire needed spectrum from the government or otherwise, if competitors acquire spectrum that will allow them to provide services competitive with our services, or if we cannot deploy services over acquired spectrum on a timely basis without burdensome conditions, at reasonable cost, and while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers and our associated financial performance could be materially adversely affected.

Competition, industry consolidation, and changes in the market for wireless services could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain customers and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

We have multiple wireless competitors, some of which have greater resources than uswe have and compete for customers based principally on service/device offerings; price;offerings, price, network coverage, speed and quality;quality and customer service. We expect market saturation to continue to cause the wireless industry’s customer growth rate to be moderate in comparison with historical growth rates, or possibly negative, leading to ongoing competition for customers. Customer churn may increase as the wireless industry shifts away from service contracts. We also expect that our customers’ appetite for data services will place increasing demands on our network capacity. This competition and our capacity will continue to put pressure on pricing and margins as companies compete for potential customers. Our ability to compete will depend on, among other things, continued absolute and relative improvement in network quality and customer services,service, effective marketing and selling of products and services, innovation, attractive pricing, and cost management, all of which will involve significant expenses.

Joint ventures, mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances in the wireless sector have resulted in and are expected to result in larger competitors competing for a limited number of customers. The two largest national wireless communicationcommunications services providers currently serve a significant percentage of all wireless customers and hold significant spectrum and other resources. Our largest competitors may be able to enter into exclusive handset, device, or content arrangements, execute pervasive advertising and marketing campaigns, or otherwise improve their cost position relative to ours. In addition, refusal of our large competitors to provide critical access to resources and inputs, such as roaming services on reasonable terms could improve their position within the wireless broadband mobile services industry.


We are also facingface intense and increasing competition from other service providers as industry sectors converge, such as cable, telecom services and content;content, satellite, wireless, and fiber; and other service providers. Companies like Comcast and AT&T/&T (with acquisitions of DirecTV (and AT&T’s proposed acquisition ofand Time Warner)Warner, Inc.) will have the scale and assets to aggressively compete in a converging industry. Verizon, through its acquisitions of AOL, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. is also a significant competitor focusing on premium content offerings as well as acquisitions and proposed acquisitions like AOL and Yahoo to diversify outside of core wireless. Further, some of our competitors now provide content services in addition to voice and broadband services, and consumers are increasingly accessing video content from Internet-based providers and applications, all of which create increased competition in this area. These factors, together with the effects of the increasing aggregate penetration of wireless services in all metropolitan areas and the ability of our larger competitors to use resources to build out their networks and to quickly deploy advanced technologies, such as 5G, could make it more difficult for us to continue to attract and retain customers, and may adversely affect our competitive position and ability to grow, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.


The scarcity and cost of additional wireless spectrum, and regulations relating to spectrum use, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We will need to acquire additional spectrum in order to continue our customer growth, expand and deepen our coverage, maintain our quality of service, meet increasing customer demands, and deploy new technologies. We will be at a competitive disadvantage and possibly experience erosion in the quality of service in certain geographic areas if we fail to gain access to necessary spectrum before reaching network capacity. As a result, we are actively seeking to make additional investment in spectrum, which could be significant.

The continued interest in, and acquisition of, spectrum by existing carriers and others may reduce our ability to acquire and/or increase the cost of acquiring spectrum in the secondary market or negatively impact our ability to gain access to spectrum through other means, including government auctions. We may need to enter into spectrum sharing or leasing arrangements, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and may involve significant expenditures. In addition, our return on investment in spectrum depends on our ability to attract additional customers and to provide additional services and usage to existing customers. As a result, the return on any investment in spectrum that we make may not be as much as we anticipate or take longer than expected. Additionally, the FCC may not be able to provide sufficient additional spectrum to auction or we may be unable to secure the spectrum we need in any auction we may elect to participate in or in the secondary market, on favorable terms or at all.

The FCC may impose conditions on the use of new wireless broadband mobile spectrum that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas. Additional conditions that may be imposed by the FCC include heightened build-out requirements, limited license terms or renewal rights, and clearing obligations that may make it less attractive or less economical to acquire spectrum. In addition, rules may be established for future government
10

Table of Contents
spectrum auctions that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas.

If we cannot acquire needed spectrum from the government or otherwise, if competitors acquire spectrum that will allow them to provide services competitive with our services, or if we cannot deploy services over acquired spectrum on a timely basis without burdensome conditions, at reasonable cost, and while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers and our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

If we are unable to take advantage of technological developments on a timely basis, we may experience a decline in demand for our services or face challenges in implementing or evolving our business strategy.

Significant technological changes continue to impact the communications industry. In general, these technological changes enhance communications and enable a broader array of companies to offer services competitive with ours. In order to grow and remain competitive with new and evolving technologies in our industry, we will need to adapt to future changes in technology, continually invest in our network, increase network capacity, enhance our existing offerings, and introduce new offerings to address our current and potential customers’ changing demands. Enhancing our network, such as deployingincluding our 5G network, is subject to risk from equipment changes and migration of customers from existing spectrum bandsolder technologies and the potential inability to secure mid-band 5G spectrum that is necessary to deployadd capacity to advanced technologies. Adopting new and sophisticated technologies may result in implementation issues such as scheduling and supplier delays, unexpected or increased costs, technological constraints, regulatory permitting issues, customer dissatisfaction, and other issues that could cause delays in launching new technological capabilities, which in turn could result in significant costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the upgrades. In general, the development of new services in the wireless telecommunications industry will require us to anticipate and respond to the continuously changing demands of our customers, which we may not be able to do accurately or timely. We could experience a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and operating results ifIf our new services fail to retain or gain acceptance in the marketplace or if costs associated with these services are higher than anticipated.anticipated, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We could be harmed by data loss or other security breaches, whether directly or by way of third parties.indirectly.

Our business, like that of most retailers and wireless companies, involves the receipt, storage, and transmission of our customers’ confidential information, including sensitive personal information and payment card information, confidential information about our employees and suppliers, and other sensitive information about our company,Company, such as our business plans, transactions and intellectual property (“confidential information”Confidential Information”). Unauthorized access to Confidential Information may be difficult to anticipate, detect, or prevent, particularly given that the methods of unauthorized access constantly change and evolve. We may experienceare subject to the threat of unauthorized access or distributiondisclosure of confidential informationConfidential Information by state-sponsored parties, malicious actors, third parties or employees, errors or breaches by third partythird-party suppliers, or other breaches of security incidents that could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of confidentialConfidential Information. In August 2018 and November 2019, we notified affected customers of incidents involving unauthorized access to certain customer information and such(not involving credit card information, financial data, social security numbers or passwords). While we do not believe these security incidents were material, we expect to continue to be the target of cyber-attacks, data breaches, canor security incidents, which may in the future have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on our business, or damage our reputation.reputation, financial condition, and operating results.


In addition, cyber-attacks,Cyber-attacks, such as denial of service and other malicious attacks, could disrupt our internal systems and applications, impair our ability to provide services to our customers, and have other adverse effects on our business and that of others who depend on our services. As a telecommunications carrier, we are considered a critical infrastructure provider and therefore may be more likely to be the target of such attacks. Such attacks against companies may be perpetrated by a variety of groups or persons, including those in jurisdictions where U.S. law enforcement is or has been unablemeasures to effectively address such attacks.attacks are ineffective or unavailable, and such attacks may even be perpetrated by or at the behest of foreign governments.

In addition, we provide confidential, proprietary and personal information to third-party service providers when it is necessary to pursueas part of our business objectives. We and ouroperations. These third-party service providers have been subject toexperienced data breaches and other attacks that included unauthorized access to confidential informationConfidential Information in the past, includingand face security challenges common to all parties that collect and process information. Past data breaches include a breach atof the networks of one of our credit checkdecisioning providers in September 2015, induring which a subset of records containing current and potential customer information was compromisedacquired by an external party.


Although we regularly review ourOur procedures and safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and to defend against attacks seeking to disrupt our services must be continually evaluated and revised to address the ever-evolving threat landscape requires us to continually evaluate and adapt our systems and processes.landscape. We cannot assure youmake assurances that theall preventive actions we taketaken will be adequate toadequately repel a significant attack or prevent information security breaches or the misuses of data, unauthorized access by third parties or employees, or exploits against third-party supplier environments. If
11

Table of Contents
we or our third-party suppliers are subject to such attacks or compromise,security breaches, we may incur significant costs or other material financial impacts, which may not be covered by, or may exceed the coverage limits of, our cyber insurance, be subject to regulatory investigations, sanctions and private litigation, experience disruptions to our operations or suffer damage to our reputation. Although the cyber-attacks that we and our third-party service providers have been subjected to in the past have not caused significant harm to our company,Any future cyber-attacks, data breaches, or security incidents may materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

System failures and business disruptions may allow unauthorized use of or interference with our network and other systems which could be materially adversely affect our reputation and financial condition.

To be successful, we must provide our customers with reliable, trustworthy service and protect the communications, location, and personal information shared or generated by our customers. We rely upon both our systems and networks and the systems and networks of other providers and suppliers to provide and support our services and, in some cases, protect our customers’ information and our information. Failure of our or others’ systems, networks, or infrastructure may prevent us from providing reliable service or may allow for the unauthorized use of or interference with our networks and other systems or for the compromise of

customer information. Examples of these risks include:


human error such as responding to deceptive communications or unintentionally executing malicious code;
physical damage, power surges or outages, or equipment failure, including those as a result of severe weather, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, political instability and volatility, and acts of war;
theft of customer and/or proprietary information offered for sale for competitive advantage or corporate extortion;
unauthorized access to our IT and business systems or to our network and critical infrastructure and those of our suppliers and other providers;
supplier failures or delays; and
system failures or outages of our business systems or communications network.

Such events could cause us to lose customers, lose revenue, incur expenses, suffer reputational and goodwill damages,damage, and subject us to litigation or governmental investigation. Remediation costs could include liability for information loss, repairing infrastructure and systems, and/or costs of incentives offered to customers. Our insurance may not cover, or be adequate to fully reimburse us for, costs and losses associated with such events.

We are in the process ofcontinue implementing a new billing system, which will support a portion of our subscribers, while maintaining our legacy billing system.systems. Any unanticipated difficulties, disruption, or significant delays could have adverse operational, financial, and reputational effects on our business.

We are currentlycontinue implementing a new customer billing system, whichthat involves a new third-party supported platform and utilization of a phased deployment approach. Post implementation,Elements of the billing system have been placed into service and are operational and we plan to operate both the existing and new billing systems in parallel to aid in the transition to the new system until all phases of the conversion are complete.

The ongoing implementation may cause major system or business disruptions, or we may fail to implement the new billing system in its entirety or in a timely or effective manner. In addition, we or the third-party billing services supporting vendor may experience errors, cyber-attacks, or other operational disruptions that could negatively impact us and over which we may have limited control. Interruptions and/or failure of this new billing services system could disrupt our operations and impact our ability to provide or bill for our services, retain customers, attract new customers, or negatively impact overall customer experience. Any occurrence of the foregoing could cause material adverse effects on our operations and financial condition, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and reputational damage.


We rely on third parties to provide products orand services for the operation of our business, and athe failure or inability byof such parties to provide these products or services could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

We depend heavily on suppliers, service providers, their subcontractors and other third parties in order for us to efficiently operate our business. OurDue to the complexity of our business, is complex, and it is not unusual for multiple vendors located in multiple locationsto engage a diverse set of suppliers to help us to develop, maintain, and troubleshoot products and services such as network components, software development services, and billing and customer service support. OurSome of our suppliers may provide services from outside of the United States, which carries associated additional regulatory and legal obligations. We generallycommonly rely upon theon suppliers to provide us with contractual assurances and to disclose accurate information regarding risks associated with their provision of products or services in accordance with our expectations
12

Table of Contents
policies and standards, such asincluding our supplier codeSupplier Code of conductConduct and our third party-risk management standard,practices. The failure of our suppliers to comply with our expectations and they may fail to do so.policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Generally, there are multiple sources forMany of the types of products and services we purchase or use.use are available through multiple sources and suppliers. However, we currently rely onthere are a limited number of suppliers forwho can support or provide billing services, voice and data communications transport services, network infrastructure, equipment, handsets, other devices, and payment processing services, among other products and services. Disruptions or failure of such suppliers to adequately perform could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations,financial condition, and financial performance.operating results.

In the past, our suppliers, contractorsservice providers and third-party retailerstheir subcontractors may not have always performed at the levels we expected or at the levels required by their contracts. Our business could be severely disrupted if keycritical suppliers contractors,or service providers or third-party retailers fail to comply with their contracts or become unable to continue the supply due to patent or other intellectual property infringement actions or other disruptions. Our business could also be disrupted if we experience delays or service degradation during any transition to a new outsourcing provider or other supplier or if we wereare required to replace the supplied products or services with those from another source, especially if the replacement becamebecomes necessary on short notice. Any such disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.


Economic, political, and market conditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and financial performance,operating results, as well as our access to financing on favorable terms or at all.

Our business, financial condition, and financial performanceoperating results are sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, including interest rates, consumer credit conditions, consumer debt levels, consumer confidence, rates of inflation (or concerns about deflation), unemployment rates, economic growth, energy costs, and other macro-economic factors. Difficult, or worsening, general economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Market volatility, political and economic uncertainty, and weak economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and financial performanceoperating results in a number of ways. Our services and device financing plans are available to a broad customer base, a significant segment of which may be more vulnerable to weak economic conditions.conditions, particularly our subprime customers. We may have greater difficulty in gaining new customers within this segment, and existing customers may be more likely to terminate service and default on device financing plans due to an inability to pay.

Weak economic conditions and credit conditions may also adversely impact our suppliers, dealers, and dealers,MVNOs, some of which have filedmay file for or may be considering bankruptcy, or may experience cash flow or liquidity problems, or aremay be unable to obtain or refinance credit such that they may no longer be able to operate. Any of these could adversely impact our ability to distribute, market, or sell our products and services.

In addition, instability in the global financial markets could lead to periodic volatility in the credit, equity, and fixed income markets. This volatility could limit our access to the credit markets, leading to higher borrowing costs or, in some cases, the inability to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.

The agreements governing our indebtedness and other financing arrangements include restrictive covenants that limit our operating flexibility.

The agreements governing our indebtedness and other financing arrangements impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions, subject in certain cases to customary baskets, exceptions, and incurrence-based ratio tests, may limit our or our subsidiaries’ ability to pursue strategic business opportunities and engage in somecertain transactions, including the following:


incurring additional indebtedness and issuing preferred stock;
paying dividends, redeeming capital stock, or making other restricted payments or investments;
selling or buying assets, properties, or licenses, including participating in future FCC auctions of spectrum or private sales of spectrum;licenses;
developing assets, properties, or licenses that we have or in the future may procure;
creating liens on assets;assets securing indebtedness or other obligations;
participating in future FCC auctions of spectrum or private sales of spectrum;
engaging in mergers, acquisitions, business combinations, or other transactions;
entering into transactions with affiliates; and
13

Table of Contents
placing restrictions on the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments.

These restrictions could limit our ability to obtain debt financing, engage in share repurchases, refinance or pay principal on our outstanding indebtedness, complete acquisitions for cash or indebtedness or react to business, economic, market and industry conditions and other changes in our operating environment or the economy. Any future indebtedness that we incur may contain similar or more restrictive covenants. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of our debt agreements and other financing arrangements may result in an event of default under these agreements, which in turn may result in defaults or acceleration of obligations under these agreements and other agreements, giving our lenders the right to terminate any commitments they had made to provide us with further funds and to require us to repay all amounts then outstanding.outstanding plus any interest, fees, penalties or premiums, which may require us to sell certain assets securing indebtedness. Any of these events wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Our significant indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our ability to make payments on our debt, to repay our existing indebtedness when due, and to fund our capital intensivecapital-intensive business and operations, and to make significant planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is in turn subject to the operational risks described elsewhere in this report. Our debt service obligations could have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and operating results, including by:


limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or the communications industry or pursuing growth opportunities;
reducing the amount of cash available for other operational or strategic needs; and

placing us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors who are less leveraged than we are.

Some of our debt also has a floating rate of interest linked to various indices. If the resets or the change in indices result in interest rate increases, debt service requirements will increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow and operating results. WhileAny hedging agreements we have and may continue to enter into agreements limitingto limit our exposure to higher interest rates in the future, any such agreementsrate increases or foreign currency fluctuations may not offer complete protection from this risk,these risks or may be unsuccessful, and consequently may effectively increase the interest rate we pay on our debt or the exchange rate with respect to such debt, and any portion not subject to such hedging agreements would have full exposure to interest rate increases or foreign currency fluctuations, as applicable.

We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to our hedging agreements. The primary credit exposure that we have with respect to our hedging agreements is that a counterparty will default on payments due, which could result in us having to acquire a replacement derivative from a different counterparty at a higher interest rates.cost or we may be unable to find a suitable replacement. The counterparties to our hedging agreements are all major financial institutions; however, this does not eliminate our exposure to credit risk with these institutions. In addition, any netting and/or set off rights we may have through master netting arrangements with these counterparties may not apply to affiliates of a counterparty with whom we may have various other financial arrangements. If any financial institutions that are parties to our hedging agreements were to default on their payment obligations to us, declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, we would be unhedged against the underlying exposures. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.results. Additionally, under some of our hedging agreements, the counterparties’ and our obligations are required to be secured by cash or U.S. Treasury securities, subject to defined thresholds. Any additional posting of collateral by us under these arrangements would negatively impact our liquidity. The modification or termination of our hedging agreements could also negatively impact our liquidity or other financial metrics.


Some of our debt has a variable rate of interest linked to various indices. If the changes in indices result in interest rate increases, our debt service requirements will increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow and operating results. In particular, some or all of our variable-rate indebtedness may use the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or similar rates as a benchmark for establishing the rate. LIBOR will be discontinued after 2021 and will be replaced with an alternative reference rate. The consequence of this development cannot be entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost of our variable rate indebtedness.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could result in a loss of investor confidence regarding our financial statements or may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we along with our independently registered public accounting firm are required to report on the effectiveness of our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting. We rely heavily on IT systems and, manual and automated processes as an important part of our internal controls in order to operate, transact, and otherwise manage our business, as well as provide effective and timely reporting of our financial results. Failure to design and maintain effective internal controls, including those over our IT systems, could constitute a material weakness that could result in
14

Table of Contents
inaccurate financial statements, inaccurate disclosures, or failure to prevent fraud. If we or our independent registered public accounting firm were unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls,control over financial reporting, investor confidence regarding our financial statements and our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our financial performancecondition and operating results will be impaired if we experience high fraud rates related to device financing, credit cards, dealers, or subscriptions.

Our operating costs could increase substantially as a result of fraud, including any fraud related to device financing, customer credit card, subscription,subscriptions, or dealer fraud.dealers. If our fraud detection strategies and processes are not successful in detecting and controlling fraud, whether directly or by way of the systems, processes, and operations of third parties such as national retailers, dealers, and others, the resulting loss of revenue or increased expenses could have a materiallymaterial adverse impacteffect on our financial condition and operating results.

We rely on highly-skilledhighly skilled personnel throughout all levels of our business. Our business could be harmed if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel or maintain our corporate culture.

The market for highly skilled workers and leaders in our industry is extremely competitive. We believe that our future success depends in substantial part on our ability to recruit, hire, motivate, develop, and retain talented and highly-skilled personnel for all areas of our organization.organization, including our CEO, the other members of our senior leadership team and highly skilled employees in technical, marketing and staff positions. Doing so may be difficult due to many factors, including fluctuations in economic and industry conditions, changes to U.S. immigration policy, competitors’ hiring practices, employee tolerance for the significant amount of change within and demands on our companyCompany and our industry, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to retain and motivate our existing employees and to attract new employees. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our existing key employees and attracting new key personnel, we may not be able to meet our business plan and, as a result, our revenue growth and profitability may be materially adversely affected. In addition, certain members of our senior leadership team, including our CEO, have term employment agreements with us. Our inability to extend the terms of these employment agreements or to replace these members or our senior leadership team at the end of their terms with qualified and capable successors could hinder our strategic planning and execution. In November 2019, we announced that John Legere would retire as our Chief Executive Officer on April 30, 2020. Our ability to execute our business strategies and retain key executives may be adversely affected by the transition to our successor, Michael Sievert.

Any acquisition, investment, or merger may subject us to significant risks, any of which may harm our business.


We may pursue acquisitions of, investments in or mergers with businesses, technologies, services and/or products that complement or expand our business. Some of these potential transactions could be significant relative to the size of our business and operations. Any such transaction would involve a number of risks and could present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:


diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
increased costs to integrate the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the business involved in any such transaction with our business;
difficulties in effectively integrating the financial and operational reporting systems of the business involved in any such transaction into (or supplanting such systems with) our financial and operational reporting infrastructure and internal control framework in an effective and timely manner;
potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process or as a result of any litigation arising in connection with any such transaction;
significant transaction expenses in connection with any such transaction, whether consummated or not;

risks related to our ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals necessary to consummate any such transaction;
acquisition financing may not be available on reasonable terms or at all and any such financing could significantly increase our outstanding indebtedness or otherwise affect our capital structure or credit ratings; and
any business, technology, service, or product involved in any such transaction may significantly under-perform relative to our expectations, and we may not achieve the benefits we expect from ourthe transaction, which could, among other things, also result in a write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with such transaction.


For any or all of these reasons, our pursuit of an acquisition, investment, or merger may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.


15

Table of Contents
Risks relatedRelated to Legal and Regulatory Matters

Changes in regulations or in the regulatory framework under which we operate could adversely affect our business, prospects orfinancial condition and operating results.

The FCC regulates the licensing, construction, modification, operation, ownership, sale, and interconnection of wireless communications systems, as do some state and local regulatory agencies. In particular, the FCC imposes significant regulation on licensees of wireless spectrum with respect to how radio spectrum is used by licensees, the nature of the services that licensees may offer and how the services may be offered, and the resolution of issues of interference between spectrum bands. Additionally, the FTC and other federal and state agencies have asserted that they have jurisdiction over some consumer protection, and elimination and prevention of anticompetitive business practices with respect to the provision of wireless products and services. We are subject to regulatory oversight by various federal, state and local agencies, as well as judicial review and actions, on issues related to the wireless industry that include, but are not limited to: roaming, interconnection, spectrum allocation and licensing, facilities siting, pole attachments, intercarrier compensation, Universal Service Fund (“USF”), net neutrality, special access, 911 services, consumer protection, consumer privacy, and cybersecurity. We are also subject to regulations in connection with other aspects of our business, including handset financing and insurance activities.

We cannot assure you that the FCC or any other federal, state or local agencies will not adopt regulations or take other enforcement or other actions that would adversely affect our business, impose new costs, or require changes in current or planned operations. For example, in June 2015,under the FCC’s newObama administration, the FCC established net neutrality rules became effective, with the exception of enhanced transparency requirements, a portion of which became effective January 2017. In 2016, the FCC also adopted a new broadbandand privacy regimeregimes that appliesapplied to our operations. Both sets of rules potentially subjectsubjected some of our initiatives and practices to more burdensome requirements and heightened scrutiny by federal and state regulators, the public, edge providers, and private litigants regarding whether such initiatives or practices are compliant. While the FCC rules are now largely rolled back under the Trump administration, some states and other jurisdictions have enacted, or are considering enacting, laws in these areas (including for example the CCPA cited below), perpetuating the risk and uncertainty regarding the regulatory environment and compliance around these issues.

In addition, states are increasingly focused on the quality of service and support that wireless communicationcommunications services providers provide to their customers and several states have proposed or enacted new and potentially burdensome regulations in this area. We also face potential investigations by, and inquiries from or actions by state Public Utility Commissions.public utility commissions. We also cannot assure you that Congress will not amend the Communications Act, from which the FCC obtains its authority, and which serves to limit state authority, or enact other legislation in a manner that could be adverse to our business.

Additionally, in June 2018, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) effective January 2020, creating new data privacy rights for California residents and new compliance obligations for us. We have incurred and will continue to incur significant implementation costs to ensure compliance with the CCPA, and we could see increased litigation costs with the law now in effect. The California Attorney General has proposed related CCPA regulations, which could be adopted in a form that increases our costs and/or litigation exposure. If we are unable to put proper controls and procedures in place to ensure compliance, it could have an adverse effect on our business. A California ballot initiative has recently been introduced by the original proponent of the CCPA that would provide additional data privacy rights and require additional implementation processes if passed. Other states, such as Nevada and Washington, have passed or are considering similar legislation, which, if passed, could create more risks and potential costs for us, especially to the extent the specific requirements of these laws vary significantly from those in California, Nevada and other existing laws.

Failure to comply with applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. We could be subject to fines, forfeitures, and other penalties (including, in extreme cases, revocation of our spectrum licenses) for failure to comply with FCC or other governmental regulations, even if any such non-compliance was unintentional. The loss of any licenses, or any related fines or forfeitures, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Unfavorable outcomes of legal proceedings may adversely affect our business, financial condition and financial condition.operating results.

We are regularly involved in a number of legal proceedings before various state and federal courts, the FCC, the FTC, other federal agencies, and state and local regulatory agencies, including state attorneys general. Such legal proceedings can be complex, costly, and highly disruptive to our business operations by diverting the attention and energiesenergy of management and other key personnel. The assessment of the outcome of legal proceedings, including our potential liability, if any, is a highly subjective process that requires judgments about future events that are not within our control. The amounts ultimately received or paid upon settlement or pursuant to final judgment, order or decree may differ materially from amounts accrued in our financial statements. In addition, litigation or similar proceedings could impose restraints on our current or future manner of
16

Table of Contents
doing business. Such potential outcomes including judgments, awards, settlements or orders could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results or ability to do business.results.


We offer highly regulated financial services products. These products expose us to a wide variety of state and federal regulations.

The financing of devices, including through our EIP and JUMP! On Demand programs, has expanded our regulatory compliance obligations. If we failFailure to remain compliant with any of theseapplicable regulations, then we facemay increase our risk exposure in the risk of:following areas:


increased consumer complaints and potential examinations or enforcement actions by federal and state regulatory agencies, including but not limited to the Consumer Financial Protection Board,Bureau, state attorneys general, the FCC and the FTC; and
violation of financial services and consumer protections regulations may result in regulatory fines, penalties, enforcement actions, civil litigation, and/or class action lawsuits.


Failure to comply with applicable regulations and the realization of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.


We may not be able to adequately protect ourthe intellectual property rights on which our business depends or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties.

We rely on a combination of patent, service mark, trademark, and trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which offer only limited protection. The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent the misappropriation of our proprietary rights. We may not have the ability in certain jurisdictions to adequately protect intellectual property rights. Moreover, others may independently develop processes and technologies that are competitive to ours. Also, we may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any unauthorized use of our proprietary rights. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights may increase the cost of protecting these rights or reduce our revenues. We cannot be sure that any legal actions against such infringers will be successful, even when our rights have been infringed. We cannot assure you that our pending or future patent applications will be granted or enforceable, or that the rights granted under any patent that may be issued will provide us with any competitive advantages. In addition, we cannot assure you that any trademark or service mark registrations will be issued with respect to pending or future applications or will provide adequate protection of our brands. We do not have insurance coverage for intellectual property losses, and as such, a charge for an anticipated settlement or an adverse ruling awarding damages represents an unplanned loss events.event. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effectseffect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights. We are a defendant in numerous intellectual property lawsuits, including patent infringement lawsuits, which exposes us to the risk of adverse financial impact either by way of significant settlement amounts or damage awards. As we adopt new technologies and new business systems and provide customers with new products and/or services, we may face additional infringement claims. These claims could require us to cease certain activities or to cease selling relevant products and services. These claims can be time-consuming and costly to defend, and divert management resources, and expose us to significant damages awards or settlements, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. In addition to litigation directly involving our company,Company, our vendors and suppliers can be threatened with patent litigation and/or subjected to the threat of disruption or blockage of sale, use, or importation of products, posing the risk of supply chain interruption to particular products and associated services exposing us towhich could have a material adverse operationaleffect on our business, financial condition and financial impacts.operating results.

Our business may be impacted by new or changingamended tax laws or regulations, andjudicial interpretations of same or administrative actions by federal, state, and/or local agencies, or how judicial authorities apply tax laws.taxing authorities.

In connection with the products and services we sell, we calculate, collect, and remit various federal, state, and local taxes, surchargesfees and regulatory feescharges (“tax” or “taxes”) to numerous federal, state and local governmental authorities, including federal USF contributions and common carrier regulatory fees. In addition, we incur and pay state and local taxes and fees on purchases of goods and services used in our business.


Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. In many cases, the application of existing, newly enacted or amended tax laws are(such as the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) may be uncertain and subject to differing interpretations, especially when evaluated against new technologies and telecommunications services, such as broadband internet access and cloud related services. Changes in tax laws could also impact revenue reported on tax inclusive plans.


17

Table of Contents
In the event that we have incorrectly described, disclosed, determined, calculated, assessed, or remitted amounts that were due to governmental authorities, we could be subject to additional taxes, fines, penalties, or other adverse actions, which could materially impact our operations orbusiness, financial condition.condition and operating results. In the event that federal, state, and/or local municipalities were to

significantly increase taxes on our network, operations, or services, or seek to impose new taxes, it could have a material adverse effect on our marginsbusiness, financial condition and financial and operationaloperating results.

Our wireless licenses are subject to renewal and may be revoked in the event that we violate applicable laws.

Our existing wireless licenses are subject to renewal upon the expiration of the 10-year or 15-year period for which they are granted. Historically, the FCC has approved our license renewal applications. However, the Communications Act provides that licenses may be revoked for cause and license renewal applications denied if the FCC determines that a renewal would not serve the public interest. In addition, our licenses are subject to our compliance with the terms set forth in the agreement pertaining to national security among Deutsche Telekom,us, DT, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security and the Company.Security. The failure of Deutsche TelekomDT or the Company to comply with the terms of this agreement could result in fines, injunctions and other penalties, including potential revocation or non-renewal of our spectrum licenses. If we fail to timely file to renew any wireless license or fail to meet any regulatory requirements for renewal, including construction and substantial service requirements, we could be denied a license renewal. Many of our wireless licenses are subject to interim or final construction requirements and there is no guarantee that the FCC will find our construction, or the construction of prior licensees, sufficient to meet the build-out or renewal requirements. The FCC has pending a rulemaking proceeding to reevaluate, among other things, its wireless license renewal showings and standards and may in this or other proceedings promulgate changes or additional substantial requirements or conditions to its renewal rules, including revising license build out requirements. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the FCC will renew our wireless licenses upon their expiration. If any of our wireless licenses were to be revoked or not renewed upon expiration, we would not be permitted to provide services under that license, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

Our business could be adversely affected by findings of product liability for health/health or safety risks from wireless devices and transmission equipment, as well as by changes to regulations/regulations or radio frequency emission standards.

We do not manufacture the devices or other equipment that we sell, and we depend on our suppliers to provide defect-free and safe equipment. Suppliers are required by applicable law to manufacture their devices to meet certain governmentally imposed safety criteria. However, even if the devices we sell meet the regulatory safety criteria, we could be held liable with the equipment manufacturers and suppliers for any harm caused by products we sell if such products are later found to have design or manufacturing defects. We generally seek to enter into indemnification agreements with the manufacturers who supply us with devices to protect us from losses associated with product liability, but we cannot guarantee that we will be fully protected in whole or in part against all losses associated with a product that is found to be defective.

Allegations have been made that the use of wireless handsets and wireless transmission equipment, such as cell towers, may be linked to various health concerns, including cancer and brain tumors. Lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers and carriers in the industry claiming damages for alleged health problems arising from the use of wireless handsets. In addition, the FCC has from time to time gathered data regarding wireless handset emissions and its assessment of this issue may evolve based on its findings. The media has also reported incidents of handset battery malfunction, including reports of batteries that have overheated. These allegations may lead to changes in regulatory standards. There have also been other allegations regarding wireless technology, including allegations that wireless handset emissions may interfere with various electronic medical devices (including hearing aids and pacemakers), airbags and anti-lock brakes. Defects in the products of our suppliers, such as the recent recalls2016 recall by a handset Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) onoriginal equipment manufacturer of one of its smartphone devices, could have ana material adverse impacteffect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Any of these allegations or risks could result in customers purchasing fewer devices and wireless services, and could also result in significant legal and regulatory liability.

Additionally, there are safety risks associated with the use of wireless devices while operating vehicles or equipment. Concerns over any of these risks and the effect of any legislation, rules or regulations that have been and may be adopted in response to these risks could limit our ability to sell our wireless services.

Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock

We are controlled by Deutsche Telekom,DT, whose interests may differ from the interests of our other stockholders.

Deutsche TelekomDT beneficially owns and possesses majority voting power of the fully diluted shares of our common stock.
Through its control of the voting power of our common stock and the rights granted to Deutsche TelekomDT in our certificate of incorporation and the Stockholder’s Agreement, Deutsche TelekomDT controls the election of our directors and all other matters requiring the approval of our stockholders. By virtue of Deutsche Telekom’sDT’s voting control, we are a “controlled company,” as defined in theThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) listing
18

Table of Contents
rules, and are not subject to NASDAQ requirements that would otherwise require us to have a

majority of independent directors, a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors or a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors. Accordingly, our stockholders will not be afforded the same protections generally as stockholders of other NASDAQ-listed companies with respect to corporate governance for so long as we rely on these exemptions from the corporate governance requirements.

In addition, our certificate of incorporation and the Stockholder’s Agreement restrict us from taking certain actions without Deutsche Telekom’sDT’s prior written consent as long as Deutsche TelekomDT beneficially owns 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, including:


the incurrence of debt (excluding certain permitted debt) if our consolidated ratio of debt to cash flow, as defined in the indenture dated April 28, 2013, for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which financial statements are available would exceed 5.25 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis;
the acquisition of any business, debt or equity interests, operations or assets of any person for consideration in excess of $1$1.0 billion;
the sale of any of our or our subsidiaries’ divisions, businesses, operations or equity interests for consideration in excess of $1$1.0 billion;
the incurrence of secured debt (excluding certain permitted secured debt);
any change in the size of our boardBoard of directors;Directors;
the issuances of equity securities in excess of 10% of our outstanding shares or to repurchase debt held by Deutsche Telekom;DT;
the repurchase or redemption of equity securities or the declaration of extraordinary or in-kind dividends or distributions other than on a pro rata basis; orand
the termination or hiring of our chief executive officer.

These restrictions could prevent us from taking actions that our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may otherwise determine are in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders or that may be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

Deutsche TelekomDT effectively has control over all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election or removal of directors, changes to our certificate of incorporation, a sale or merger of our companyCompany and other transactions requiring stockholder approval under Delaware law. Deutsche Telekom’sDT’s controlling interest may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from seeking to acquire, the Company. Deutsche TelekomDT may have strategic, financial, or other interests different from our other stockholders, including as the holder of a substantial amount of our indebtedness and as the counter-party in a number of commercial arrangements, and may make decisions adverse to the interests of our other stakeholders.stockholders.

In addition, we license certain trademarks from DT, including the right to use the trademark “T-Mobile” as a name for the Company and our flagship brand, under a trademark license agreement with DT. As described in more detail in our proxy statement under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons and Approval,” we are obligated under the trademark license agreement to pay DT a royalty in an amount equal to 0.25%, which we refer to as the royalty rate, of the net revenue (as defined in the trademark license) generated by products and services we sell under the licensed trademarks. The trademark license agreement includes a royalty rate adjustment mechanism that would have occurred in early 2018 and potentially resulted in a new royalty rate effective in January 2019. The license agreement includes a royalty rate adjustment mechanism that has been postponed until the conclusion of the proposed Sprint Merger. The current royalty rate will remain effective until that time. The royalty rate under the license agreement will be adjusted retroactively if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated. We also have the right to terminate the trademark license upon one year’s prior notice. An increase in the royalty rate or termination of the trademark license could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Future sales or issuances of our common stock, including sales by Deutsche Telekom,DT, could have a negative impact on our stock price.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares or the availability of shares of our common stock will have on the prevailing trading price of our common stock from time to time. Sales or issuances of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause our stock price to decline and could result in dilution of your shares.

We and Deutsche TelekomDT are parties to the Stockholder’s Agreement pursuant to which Deutsche TelekomDT is free to transfer its shares in public sales without notice, as long as such transactions would not result in the transferee owning 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If a transfer would exceed the 30% threshold, it is prohibited unless the transferee makes a binding offer to
19

Table of Contents
purchase all of the other outstanding shares on the same price and terms. The Stockholder’s Agreement does not otherwise impose any other restrictions on the sales of common stock by Deutsche Telekom.DT. Moreover, we have filedmay be required to file a shelf registration statement with respect to the common stock and certain debt securities held by Deutsche Telekom,DT, which would facilitate the resale by Deutsche TelekomDT of all or any portion of the shares of our common stock it holds. The sale of shares of our common stock by Deutsche TelekomDT (other than in transactions involving the purchase of all of our outstanding shares) could significantly increase the number of shares available in the market, which could cause a decrease in our stock price. In addition, even if Deutsche TelekomDT does not sell a large number of its shares into the market, its right to transfer a large number of shares into the market may depress our stock price.
In addition, we have reserved up to 38.684 million shares of common stock for issuance upon conversion of our preferred stock, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. The dividends on the preferred stock may also be paid in cash or, subject to certain limitations, shares of common stock or any combination of cash and shares of common stock. The issuance of additional shares of common stock upon conversion of, or in connection with the payment of dividends upon, the mandatory

convertible preferred stock may depress our stock price.

Our stock price may be volatile and may fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business, financial condition and operating results.

The trading prices of the securities of communications companies historically have been highly volatile, and the trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations. Our stock price may fluctuate in reaction to a number of events and factors that may include, among other things:


our or our competitors’ actual or anticipated operating and financial results;
introduction of new products and services by us or our competitors or changes in service plans or pricing by us or our competitors;
analyst projections, predictions and forecasts, analyst target prices for our securities and changes in, or our failure to meet, securities analysts’ expectations;
transaction in our common stock by major investors;
Deutsche Telekom’sshare repurchases by us or purchases by DT;
DT’s financial performance, results of operation, or actions implied or taken by Deutsche Telekom;DT;
entry of new competitors into our markets or perceptions of increased price competition, including a price war;
our performance, including subscriber growth, and our financial and operational metric performance;
market perceptions relating to our services, network, handsets, and deployment of our LTE platformand 5G platforms and our access to iconic handsets, services, applications, or content;
market perceptions of the wireless communications services industry and valuation models for us and the industry;
conditions or trends in the Internet and the industry sectors in which we operate in;operate;
changes in our credit rating or future prospects;
changes in interest rates;
changes in our capital structure, including issuance of additional debt or equity to the public;
the availability or perceived availability of additional capital in general and our access to such capital;
actual or anticipated consolidation, or other strategic mergers or acquisition activities involving us or our competitors, or other participants in related or adjacent industries, or market speculations regarding such activities;activities, including the pending Merger and views of market participants regarding the likelihood the conditions to the Merger will be satisfied and the anticipated benefits of the Merger will be realized;
disruptions of our operations or service providers or other vendors necessary to our network operations;
the general state of the U.S. and world politics and economies, including changes in interest rates;economies; and
availability of additional spectrum, whether by the announcement, commencement, bidding and closing of auctions for new spectrum or the acquisition of companies that own spectrum, and the extent to which we or our competitors succeed in acquiring additional spectrum.

In addition, the stock market has been volatile in the recent past and has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations, which may continue for the foreseeable future. This volatility has had a significant impact on the trading price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in the communications industry. These changes frequently occur irrespective of the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the trading price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business, financial condition and operating results.

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.


We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures
20

Table of Contents
governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. In addition, no dividend may be declared or paid on our common stock, other than dividends payable solely in Shares of our common stock, unless all accrued dividends for all completed dividend periods have been declared and paid on our preferred stock. Other than to pay dividends on our preferred stock, weWe currently intend to retainuse future earnings, if any, to invest in our business.business and to fund our previously authorized stock repurchase program if the Merger fails to close.


Our previously announced stock repurchase program, and any subsequent stock purchase program put in place from time to time, could affect the price of our common stock, increase the volatility of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves. Such repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.

We may have in place from time to time, a stock repurchase program. Any such stock repurchase program adopted will not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares of common stock and may be suspended or discontinued at any time, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased under any such stock repurchase program depends on a variety of factors including the timing of open trading windows, the price of our common stock, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. We may effect repurchases under any stock repurchase program from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including accelerated stock repurchase arrangements. Repurchases pursuant to any such stock repurchase program could affect our stock price and increase its volatility. The existence of a stock repurchase program could also cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. There can be no assurance that any stock repurchases will enhance stockholder rights planvalue because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares of common stock. Although our stock repurchase program is intended to enhance stockholder value, short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness. Additionally, our share repurchase program could diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to finance future growth and to pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions. SeeItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations- Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information.

Risks Related to the Proposed Transactions

The closing of the Transactions is subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of approval from, and the absence of any order preventing the closing issued by, governmental entities, which may not approve the Transactions, may delay the approval for, or may impose conditions or restrictions on, jeopardize or delay completion of, or reduce or delay the anticipated benefits of, the Transactions, and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Transactions will not be completed.

The completion of the Transactions is subject to a number of conditions, including, among others, the receipt of approval from, and the absence of any legal requirements preventing the completion of the Transactions enacted or enforced by, governmental entities, including courts. As noted below, while the parties have obtained a number of approvals from governmental entities to date, the Transactions remain subject to various judicial proceedings, and the California Public Utility Commission review remains pending.

In connection with the required approval for the Transactions, we have agreed to significant actions and conditions, including the planned Prepaid Transaction (as defined below) and ongoing commercial and transition services arrangements to be entered into in connection with such Prepaid Transaction, which we and Sprint announced on July 26, 2019 (collectively, the “Divestiture Transaction”), a stipulation and order and proposed final judgment with the U.S. Department of Justice, which we and Sprint announced on July 26, 2019 (the “Consent Decree”), the proposed commitments contained in the ex parte presentation filed with the Secretary of the FCC, which we and Sprint announced on May 20, 2019 (the “FCC Commitments”) and commitments and undertakings we have entered into at the federal and state level (collectively, with the Consent Decree, the FCC Commitments and any other commitments or undertakings that we have entered into and may in the future enter into with governmental authorities (including but not limited to those we have made to certain states) and nongovernmental organizations, the “Government Commitments”). All state public utility commission proceedings have been completed other than the California Public Utility Commission review, which remains pending.

While the parties have received approval from the FCC, the DOJ and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for the Transactions to proceed subject to the above-described commitments and undertakings, the Transactions remain subject to several judicial proceedings. The Consent Decree is subject to judicial approval, which proceeding is underway. The attorneys general of certain states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in New York federal court seeking an order prohibiting the consummation of the Transactions. The trial in that case has concluded and the parties are awaiting the judge’s ruling. Another case seeking to prohibit the Transactions was filed in California federal court on behalf of individual consumers, and has been stayed pending the outcome of the New York case. Appeals of any or all of these judicial and agency actions could be filed, which could further delay the Transactions or, if the Transactions close over a pending proceeding, create
21

Table of Contents
risk and uncertainty after the Transactions close. The ultimate outcome of these matters is uncertain and there is no assurance that we will prevail or prevail in a timely manner, or whether remaining required approvals will be subject to additional required actions, conditions, limitations or restrictions on the combined company’s business, operations or assets. Such litigation, and any such additional required actions, conditions, limitations or restrictions, may prevent the completion of the Transactions, or, even if they do not prevent the completion of the Transactions, they may delay such completion, or reduce or delay the anticipated benefits of the Transactions, which could result in a material adverse effect on our or the combined company’s business, financial condition or operating results. In particular, the substantial delay in the completion of the Transactions may delay, reduce or eliminate synergies and other benefits anticipated to be realized from the Transactions and/or increase costs and expenses associated with the Transactions.

In addition, because the Transactions were not completed by the “outside date” provided in the Business Combination Agreement, each of T-Mobile and Sprint may terminate the Business Combination Agreement unless the parties agree to extend such outside date, and there can be no assurance that the parties will not exercise this termination right or will agree to extend the outside date. Furthermore, the completion of the Transactions is also subject to T-Mobile USA having specified minimum credit ratings on the closing date of the Transactions (after giving effect to the Merger) from at least two of three specified credit rating agencies, subject to certain qualifications. There is no assurance that the required ratings will be obtained or that they will be obtained in a timely manner. In the event that we terminate the Business Combination Agreement in connection with a failure to satisfy the closing condition related to the specified minimum credit ratings, then in certain circumstances, we may be required to pay Sprint an amount equal to $600 million. The Business Combination Agreement may also be terminated if there is a final and non-appealable order or injunction preventing the consummation of the Transactions or the other conditions to closing are not satisfied, and we and Sprint may also mutually decide to terminate or amend the Business Combination Agreement.

Failure to complete, or additional delay in the completion of, the Merger could negatively impact us and our business, assets, liabilities, prospects, outlook, financial condition or results of operations.

If the completion of the Merger is prevented or continues to be delayed, or if the Merger is not completed for any other reason, we may be subject to a number of material risks. The price of our common stock may decline to the extent that its current market price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will or may be completed. In addition, significant costs related to the Transactions must be paid by us whether or not the Transactions are completed. Furthermore, we may experience negative reactions from our stockholders, customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, retailers, dealers and others who deal with us, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, it is expected that if the Merger is not completed, we will continue to lack the network, scale and financial resources of the current market share leaders in, and other companies that have more recently begun providing, wireless services. Further, if the Merger is not completed, we will need to seek access to additional wireless spectrum, in particular mid-band wireless spectrum through other sources, which if we are not successful, in turn would impact our ability to maintain (or improve) service from current levels, and to deploy a broad and deep nationwide 5G network on the same scale and on the same timeline as the combined company, and therefore limit our ability to compete effectively in the 5G era.

We are subject to various uncertainties, including litigation and contractual restrictions and requirements while the Transactions are pending that could disrupt our or the combined company’s business and adversely affect our or the combined company’s business, assets, liabilities, prospects, outlook, financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainty about whether the Transactions will be completed and/or the effect of the Transactions on employees, customers, suppliers, vendors, distributors, dealers and retailers may have an adverse effect on us or the combined company. These uncertainties may impair the ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel during the pendency of the Transactions and, whether or not the Transactions are completed, for a period of time thereafter, as existing and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with us or the combined company. If key employees, including key employees of Sprint, depart because of issues related to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the combined company, the combined company’s business following the completion of the Transactions could be negatively impacted. We or the combined company may have to incur significant costs in identifying, hiring and retaining replacements for departing employees and may lose significant expertise and talent. Additionally, these uncertainties could cause customers, suppliers, distributors, dealers, retailers and others to seek to change or cancel existing business relationships with us or the combined company or fail to renew existing relationships. Suppliers, distributors and content and application providers may also delay or cease developing for us or the combined company new products that are necessary for the operations of its business due to the uncertainty created by the Transactions. Competitors may also target our existing customers by highlighting potential uncertainties and integration difficulties that may result from the Transactions.

22

Table of Contents
The Business Combination Agreement also restricts us, without Sprint’s consent, from taking certain actions outside of the ordinary course of business while the Transactions are pending, including, among other things, certain acquisitions or dispositions of businesses and assets, entering into or amending certain contracts, repurchasing or issuing securities, making capital expenditures, incurring indebtedness, and refinancing existing indebtedness, in each case subject to certain exceptions. These restrictions and the inability to independently access the debt capital markets during the pendency of the Merger may have a significant negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Management and financial resources have been diverted and will continue to be diverted toward the completion of the Transactions. We have incurred, and expect to incur, significant costs, expenses and fees for professional services and other transaction costs in connection with the Transactions. These costs could adversely affect our or the combined company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we and our affiliates are involved in various disputes, governmental and/or regulatory inspections, investigations and proceedings and litigation matters, including for example the antitrust litigation related to the Transactions brought by the attorneys general of certain states and the District of Columbia, and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters or other future matters, could prevent the consummation of the Transactions and/or adversely affect us and our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the combined company.

The Business Combination Agreement contains provisions that restrict the ability of our Board to pursue alternatives to the Transactions.

The Business Combination Agreement contains non-solicitation provisions that restrict our ability to solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage or knowingly take any other action designed to facilitate, any inquiries regarding, or the making of, any proposal the completion of which would constitute an alternative transaction for purposes of the Business Combination Agreement. In addition, the Business Combination Agreement does not permit us to terminate the Business Combination Agreement in order to enter into an agreement providing for, or to complete, such an alternative transaction. Furthermore, if the completion of the Transactions continues to be delayed, we or the combined company may be unable to pursue strategic opportunities or business transactions that we may otherwise pursue, such as spectrum acquisitions, share buybacks and/or debt transactions.

Our directors and officers may have interests in the Transactions different from the interests of our stockholders.

Certain of our directors and executive officers negotiated the terms of the Business Combination Agreement. Our directors and executive officers may have interests in the Transactions that are different from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders. These interests include, but are not limited to, the continued service of certain of our directors as directors of the combined company, the continued employment of certain of our executive officers by the combined company, severance arrangements and employment terms linked to the Transactions and other rights held by our directors and executive officers, and provisions in the Business Combination Agreement regarding continued indemnification of and advancement of expenses to our directors and officers.

Risks Related to Integration and the Combined Company

Although we expect that the Transactions will result in synergies and other benefits, those synergies and benefits may not be realized or may not be realized within the expected time frame, and risks associated with the foregoing may increase as a changeresult of the extended delay in the completion of the Transactions.

Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Transactions will depend, to a large extent, on the combined company’s ability to integrate our and Sprint’s businesses in a manner that facilitates growth opportunities and achieves the projected standalone cost savings and revenue growth trends identified by each company without adversely affecting current revenues and investments in future growth. In addition, some of the anticipated synergies are not expected to occur for a significant time period following the completion of the Transactions and will require substantial capital expenditures in the near term to be fully realized. Moreover, additional delay in the completion of the Transactions may delay, reduce or eliminate the anticipated synergies and other benefits of the Transactions, including as a result of the delay in the integration of, or inability to integrate, the networks of T-Mobile and Sprint to launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network and increasing costs and expenses incurred by T-Mobile and Sprint during the pendency of the Transactions. Even if the combined company is able to integrate the two companies successfully, the anticipated benefits of the Transactions, including the expected synergies and network benefits, may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

Our business and Sprint’s business may not be integrated successfully or such integration may be more difficult, time consuming or costly than expected. Operating costs, customer loss and business disruption, including difficulties in
23

Table of Contents
completing the Divestiture Transaction, satisfying all of the Government Commitments and maintaining relationships with employees, customers, suppliers or vendors, may be greater than expected following the Transactions. Revenues following the Transactions may be lower than expected.

The combination of two independent businesses is complex, costly and time-consuming and may divert significant management attention and resources to combining our and Sprint’s business practices and operations. This process, as well as the Divestiture Transaction and the Government Commitments, may disrupt our business or otherwise impact our ability to compete. The failure to meet the challenges involved in combining our and Sprint’s businesses and to realize the anticipated benefits of the Transactions could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined company and could adversely affect the results of operations of the combined company. The overall combination of our and Sprint’s businesses, the completion of the Divestiture Transaction and compliance with the Government Commitments may also result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses and impacts, and loss of customer and other business relationships. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies, completing the Divestiture Transaction and satisfying all of the Government Commitments include, among others:

the diversion of management attention to integration matters;
difficulties in integrating operations and systems, including intellectual property and communications systems, administrative and information technology infrastructure and financial reporting and internal control systems;
challenges in conforming standards, controls, procedures and accounting and other policies, business cultures and compensation structures between the two companies;
differences in control environments, cultures, and auditor expectations may result in future material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, and/or control deficiencies while we work to integrate the companies and align guidelines and practices;
alignment of key performance measurements may result in a greater need to communicate and manage clear expectations while we work to integrate the companies and align guidelines and practices;
difficulties in integrating employees and attracting and retaining key personnel;
challenges in retaining existing customers and obtaining new customers;
difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, accretion targets, business opportunities, financing plans and growth prospects from the combination;
difficulties in managing the expanded operations of a significantly larger and more complex company;
the impact of the additional debt financing expected to be incurred in connection with the Transactions;
the transition of management to the combined company management team, and the need to address possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies;
challenges in managing the divestiture process for the Divestiture Transaction and the ongoing commercial and transition services arrangements to be entered into in connection with the Divestiture Transaction;
known or potential unknown liabilities arising in connection with the Divestiture Transaction that are larger than expected;
an increase in competition from DISH and other third parties that DISH may enter into commercial agreements with, who are significantly larger than we are and enjoy greater resources and scale advantages as compared to us;
difficulties in satisfying the large number of Government Commitments in the required timeframes and cost incurred in the tracking and monitoring of them, including the network build-out obligations under the Government Commitments;
known or potential unknown liabilities of Sprint that are larger than expected; and
other potential adverse consequences and unforeseen increased expenses or liabilities associated with the Transactions, the Divestiture Transaction and the Government Commitments.

Some of these factors are outside of our Companycontrol and/or will be outside the control of the combined company, and any one of them could result in instanceslower revenues, higher costs and diversion of management time and energy, which could materially impact the business, financial condition and results of operations of the combined company. In addition, even if the operations of our and Sprint’s businesses are integrated successfully, the full benefits of the Merger may not be realized, including, among others, the synergies, cost savings or sales or growth opportunities that are expected, including as a result of the Divestiture Transaction, the Government Commitments and/or the other actions and conditions we have agreed to in connection with the Transactions, or otherwise. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame or at all. Further, additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of our and Sprint’s businesses and in connection with the Divestiture Transaction and the Government Commitments, including potential penalties that could arise if we fail to fulfill our obligations thereunder. All of these factors could suppress the earnings per share of the combined company, decrease or delay the projected accretive effect of the Merger, and negatively impact the price of our common stock following the Merger. As a result, it cannot be assured that the combination of T-Mobile and Sprint will result in the realization of the full benefits expected from the Transactions within the anticipated time frames or at all.

24

Table of Contents
The indebtedness of the combined company following the completion of the Transactions will be substantially greater than the indebtedness of each of T-Mobile and Sprint on a standalone basis prior to the execution of the Business Combination Agreement. This increased level of indebtedness could adversely affect the combined company’s business flexibility and increase its borrowing costs.

In connection with the Transactions, we and Sprint have conducted, and expect to conduct, certain pre-Merger financing transactions, which some stockholderswill be used in part to prepay a portion of our and Sprint’s existing indebtedness and to fund liquidity needs. After giving effect to the pre-Merger financing transactions and the Transactions, we anticipate that the combined company will have consolidated indebtedness of up to approximately $69.0 billion to $71.0 billion, based on estimated December 31, 2019 debt and cash balances, and excluding tower obligations and operating lease liabilities.

Our substantially increased indebtedness following the Transactions could have the effect, among other things, of reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business, economic, market and industry conditions and increasing the amount of cash required to meet interest payments. In addition, this increased level of indebtedness following the Transactions may believereduce funds available to support efforts to combine our and Sprint’s businesses and realize the expected benefits of the Transactions, and may also reduce funds available for capital expenditures, share repurchases and other activities that may put the combined company at a changecompetitive disadvantage relative to other companies with lower debt levels. Further, it may be necessary for the combined company to incur substantial additional indebtedness in controlthe future, subject to the restrictions contained in its debt instruments, which could increase the risks associated with the capital structure of the combined company.

Because of the substantial indebtedness of the combined company following the completion of the Transactions, there is a risk that the combined company may not be able to service its debt obligations in accordance with their best interests.terms.

The ability of the combined company to service its substantial debt obligations following the Transactions will depend on future performance, which will be affected by business, economic, market and industry conditions and other factors, including the ability of the combined company to achieve the expected benefits of the Transactions. There is no guarantee that the combined company will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service its debt obligations when due. If the combined company is unable to meet such obligations or fails to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the agreements governing such debt obligations, it may be required to refinance all or part of its debt, sell important strategic assets at unfavorable prices or make additional borrowings. The combined company may not be able to, at any given time, refinance its debt, sell assets or make additional borrowings on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations after the Transactions.

Some or all of the combined company’s variable-rate indebtedness may use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the rate. LIBOR will be discontinued after 2021 and will be replaced with an alternative reference rate. The consequence of this development cannot be entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost of our variable rate indebtedness. In addition, any hedging agreements we have and may continue to enter into to limit our exposure to interest rate increases or foreign currency fluctuations may not offer complete protection from these risks or may be unsuccessful, and consequently may effectively increase the interest rate we pay on our debt or the exchange rate with respect to such debt, and any portion not subject to such hedging agreements would have full exposure to interest rate increases or foreign currency fluctuations, as applicable. If any financial institutions that are parties to our hedging agreements were to default on their payment obligations to us, declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, we would be unhedged against the underlying exposures. Any posting of collateral by us under our hedging agreements and the modification or termination of any of our hedging agreements could negatively impact our liquidity or other financial metrics. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

The agreements governing the combined company’s indebtedness and other financings will include restrictive covenants that limit the combined company’s operating flexibility.

The agreements governing the combined company’s indebtedness and other financings will impose material operating and financial restrictions on the combined company. These restrictions, subject in certain cases to customary baskets, exceptions and maintenance and incurrence-based financial tests, may limit the combined company’s ability to engage in transactions and pursue strategic business opportunities, including the following:

incurring additional indebtedness and issuing preferred stock;
paying dividends, redeeming capital stock or making other restricted payments or investments;
selling or buying assets, properties or licenses;
developing assets, properties or licenses which the combined company has or in the future may procure;
25

Table of Contents
creating liens on assets securing indebtedness or other obligations;
participating in future FCC auctions of spectrum or private sales of spectrum;
engaging in mergers, acquisitions, business combinations or other transactions;
entering into transactions with affiliates; and
placing restrictions on the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments.

These restrictions could limit the combined company’s ability to obtain debt financing, make share repurchases, refinance or pay principal on its outstanding indebtedness, complete acquisitions for cash or indebtedness or react to business, economic, market and industry conditions and other changes in its operating environment or the economy. Any future indebtedness that the combined company incurs may contain similar or more restrictive covenants. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of the combined company’s debt agreements may result in an event of default under these agreements, which in turn may result in defaults or acceleration of obligations under these and other agreements, giving the combined company’s lenders the right to terminate any commitments they had made to provide it with further funds and to require the combined company to repay all amounts then outstanding plus any interest, fees, penalties or premiums, and which may include requiring the combined company to sell certain assets securing indebtedness.

The financing of the Transactions is not assured.

We have received commitments for��$27.0 billion in debt financing to fund the Transactions, which is comprised of (i) stockholder rights plan (“Rights Plan”) in effect that will$4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility, (ii) a $4.0 billion term loan credit facility and (iii) a $19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility. Furthermore, the Merger financing commitments currently expire in March 2017, unless renewed. The Rights Plan will cause substantial dilutionon May 1, 2020, and if the completion of the Transactions continues to a personbe delayed, any extension of the financing commitments or group that attempts to acquire our companynew financing commitments may not be obtained on the expected terms that our board of directors

does not believe are in our and our stockholders’ best interest. The Rights Planor at all. Our reliance on the financing from the $19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility commitment is intended to protect stockholdersbe reduced through one or more secured note offerings or other long-term financings prior to the Merger closing. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to issue any such secured notes or other long-term financings on terms we find acceptable or at all, especially in light of recent debt market volatility, in which case we may have to exercise some or all of the commitments under the secured bridge facility to fund the Transactions. 

The obligation of the lenders to provide these debt financing facilities is subject to a number of conditions and the financing of the Transactions may not be obtained on the expected terms or at all. Accordingly, the costs of financing for the Transactions may be higher than expected.

Credit rating downgrades could adversely affect the businesses, cash flows, financial condition and operating results of T-Mobile and, following the Transactions, the combined company.

Credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings, and, as a result, cost of capital. Our current ratings reflect each rating agency’s opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations or, following the completion of the Transactions, obligations to the combined company’s obligors. Each rating agency reviews these ratings periodically and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the eventfuture. A downgrade in the rating of an unfair us and/or coercive offerSprint could adversely affect the businesses, cash flows, financial condition and operating results of T-Mobile and, following the Transactions, the combined company.

We have incurred, and will incur, direct and indirect costs as a result of the Transactions.

We have incurred, and will incur, substantial expenses in connection with and as a result of completing the Transactions, the Divestiture Transaction and compliance with the Government Commitments, and over a period of time following the completion of the Transactions, the combined company also expects to acquireincur substantial expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating our and Sprint’s businesses, operations, policies and procedures. A portion of the Companytransaction costs related to the Transactions will be incurred regardless of whether the Transactions are completed. While we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses will exceed the costs historically borne by us. These costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to provide our boardthe Transactions and the financial condition and results of directors with adequate time to evaluate unsolicited offers. The Rights Plan may prevent or make takeovers or unsolicited corporate transactions with respect to ouroperations of the combined company more difficult, even if stockholders may consider such transactions favorable, possibly including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares.following the Transactions.


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


None.


26

Item 2. Properties


As of December 31, 2016,2019, our significant properties usedthat we primarily lease and use in connection with switching centers, data centers, call centers and warehouses were as follows:
Approximate NumberApproximate Size in Square Feet
Switching centers62  1,400,000  
Data centers 600,000  
Call center17  1,500,000  
Warehouses17  500,000  
 Approximate Number Approximate Size in Square Feet
Switching centers57
 1,400,000
Data centers8
 600,000
Call center16
 1,300,000
Warehouses16
 500,000


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we leased approximately 60,000primarily leased:

Approximately 66,000 macro towers and 25,000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites.

As of December 31, 2016, we leased approximately 2,000Approximately 2,200 T-Mobile and MetroPCSMetro by T-Mobile retail locations, including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17,000 square feet.

We currently lease officeOffice space totaling approximately 950,0001,200,000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. We use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes. We also lease
Office space throughout the U.S., totaling approximately 1,200,0001,700,000 square feet, as of December 31, 2016, for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative, engineering and sales purposes.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings


See Note 122 - Business Combinations and Note 16 – Commitments and Contingenciesof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures


None.


PART II.


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Market Information


Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “TMUS.” T-Mobile was added to the S&P 500 Index effective prior to the open of trading on July 15, 2019. We were added to the S&P 500 GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) Wireless Telecommunication Services Sub-Industry index. As of December 31, 2016,2019, there were 309258 registered stockholders of record of our common stock, but we estimate the total number of stockholders to be much higher as a number of our shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name.



The high and low common stock sales prices per share were as follows:
27

 High Low
Year Ended December 31, 2016   
First Quarter$41.23
 $33.23
Second Quarter44.13
 37.93
Third Quarter48.11
 42.71
Fourth Quarter59.19
 44.91
Year Ended December 31, 2015   
First Quarter$33.48
 $26.46
Second Quarter40.77
 31.19
Third Quarter43.43
 36.33
Fourth Quarter42.06
 34.24

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. In addition, no dividend may be declared or paid on our common stock, other than dividends payable solely in sharesTable of our common stock, unless all accrued dividends for all completed dividend periods have been declared and paid on our preferred stock. Other than to pay dividends on our preferred stock, we currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to invest in our business. Subject to Delaware law, our board of directors will determine the payment of future dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount of any dividends in light of:Contents

any applicable contractual or charter restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends;  
our earnings and cash flows;  
our capital requirements;  
our future needs for cash;
our financial condition; and  
other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

Performance Graph


The graph below compares the five-year cumulative total returns of T-Mobile, the NASDAQ CompositeS&P 500 index, the S&P 500NASDAQ Composite index and the Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment, with the reinvestment of all dividends, from December 31, 20112014 to December 31, 2016. For periods prior to2019.

tmus-20191231_g2.jpg

The five-year cumulative total returns of T-Mobile, the closing ofS&P 500 index, the business combination with MetroPCS, our stock price performance representsNASDAQ Composite index and the stock price of MetroPCS, adjusted to reflectDow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM index, as illustrated in the 1-for-2 reverse stock split effected on April 30, 2013.graph above, are as follows:

At December 31,
201420152016201720182019
T-Mobile US, Inc.$100.00  $145.21  $213.47  $235.75  $236.12  $291.09  
S&P 500100.00  101.38  113.51  138.29  132.23  173.86  
NASDAQ Composite100.00  106.96  116.45  150.96  146.67  200.49  
Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM100.00  104.87  133.65  136.66  162.64  184.44  


 At December 31,
 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
T-Mobile US, Inc.$100.00
 $114.52
 $294.49
 $235.83
 $342.46
 $503.44
S&P 500100.00
 116.00
 153.58
 174.60
 177.01
 198.18
NASDAQ Composite100.00
 116.41
 165.47
 188.69
 200.32
 216.54
Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM100.00
 150.31
 198.58
 177.40
 186.04
 237.09


The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data


The following selected financial data are derived from our consolidated financial statements. In connection with the business combination with MetroPCS, the selected financial data prior to May 1, 2013 represents T-Mobile USA’s historical financial data. The data below should be read together with Risk Factors included in Part 1,I, Item 1A, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.



28

Table of Contents
Selected Financial Data
(in millions, except per share and customer amounts)As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
2019 (1)
2018 (2)
201720162015
Statement of Operations Data
Total service revenues$33,994  $31,992  $30,160  $27,844  $24,821  
Total revenues44,998  43,310  40,604  37,490  32,467  
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  4,050  2,479  
Total other expense, net(1,119) (1,392) (1,727) (1,723) (1,501) 
Income tax (expense) benefit (3)
(1,135) (1,029) 1,375  (867) (245) 
Net income3,468  2,888  4,536  1,460  733  
Net income attributable to common stockholders3,468  2,888  4,481  1,405  678  
Earnings per share
Basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  $1.71  $0.83  
Diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  $1.69  $0.82  
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents$1,528  $1,203  $1,219  $5,500  $4,582  
Property and equipment, net (1)
21,984  23,359  22,196  20,943  20,000  
Spectrum licenses36,465  35,559  35,366  27,014  23,955  
Total assets (1)
86,921  72,468  70,563  65,891  62,413  
Total debt and financing lease liabilities, excluding tower obligations (1)
27,272  27,547  28,319  27,786  26,243  
Stockholders' equity28,789  24,718  22,559  18,236  16,557  
Statement of Cash Flows and Operational Data
Net cash provided by operating activities (4)
$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,779  $1,877  
Purchases of property and equipment(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) (4,702) (4,724) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(967) (127) (5,828) (3,968) (1,935) 
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions (4)
3,876  5,406  4,319  3,356  3,537  
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (4)
(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 463  3,413  
Total customers (in thousands) (5)
86,046  79,651  72,585  71,455  63,282  
(1)On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” and all the related amendments (collectively, the “new lease standard”), using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the standards in effect for those periods. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and all the related amendments (collectively, the “new revenue standard”), using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the standards in effect for those periods. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(3)In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was signed into legislation. The TCJA included numerous changes to existing tax law, including a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The rate reduction took place on January 1, 2018. We recognized a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion associated with the enactment of the TCJA in Income tax (expense) benefit in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to a re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
(4)On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (the “new cash flow standard”) which impacted the presentation of our cash flows related to our beneficial interests in securitization transactions, which is the deferred purchase price, resulting in a reclassification of cash inflows from Operating activities to Investing activities of approximately $4.3 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The new cash flow standard also impacted the presentation of our cash payments for debt prepayment and debt extinguishment costs, resulting in a reclassification of cash outflows from Operating activities to Financing activities of $188 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There were no cash payments for debt prepayment and debt extinguishment costs during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. We have applied the new cash flow standard retrospectively to all periods presented.
(5)We believe current and future regulatory changes have made the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners uneconomical. We will continue to support our wholesale partners offering the Lifeline program, but have excluded the Lifeline customers from our reported wholesale subscriber base resulting in the removal of 4,528,000 reported wholesale customers in 2017.

29

(in millions, except per share and customer amounts)As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Statement of Operations Data         
Total service revenues$27,844
 $24,821
 $22,375
 $19,068
 $17,213
Total revenues37,242
 32,053
 29,564
 24,420
 19,719
Operating income (loss)3,802
 2,065
 1,416
 996
 (6,397)
Total other expense, net(1,475) (1,087) (1,003) (945) (589)
Income tax (expense) benefit(867) (245) (166) 16
 350
Net income (loss)1,460
 733
 247
 35
 (7,336)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders1,405
 678
 247
 35
 (7,336)
Earnings (loss) per share:         
Basic1.71
 0.83
 0.31
 0.05
 (13.70)
Diluted1.69
 0.82
 0.30
 0.05
 (13.70)
Balance Sheet Data         
Cash and cash equivalents$5,500
 $4,582
 $5,315
 $5,891
 $394
Property and equipment, net20,943
 20,000
 16,245
 15,349
 12,807
Spectrum licenses27,014
 23,955
 21,955
 18,122
 14,550
Total assets65,891
 62,413
 56,639
 49,946
 33,622
Total debt, excluding tower obligations27,786
 26,243
 21,946
 20,182
 14,945
Stockholders’ equity18,236
 16,557
 15,663
 14,245
 6,115
Other Financial and Operational Data         
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,135
 $5,414
 $4,146
 $3,545
 $3,862
Purchases of property and equipment(4,702) (4,724) (4,317) (4,025) (2,901)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(3,968) (1,935) (2,900) (381) (387)
Net cash provided by financing activities463
 3,413
 2,524
 4,044
 57
Total customers (in thousands)71,455
 63,282
 55,018
 46,684
 33,389
Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview


The objectives of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) are to provide users of our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements with the following:


A narrative explanation from the perspective of management of our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect future results;
Context to the financial statements; and
Information that allows assessment of the likelihood that past performance is indicative of future performance.


Our MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for the three years ended December 31, 20162019, included in Part II,II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed throughout our MD&A are those of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Business Overview


Un-carrier Strategy

We introducedare the Un-carrier. Through our Un-carrier strategy, we have disrupted the wireless communications services industry, rattling the status quo, by actively engaging with and listening to our customers and eliminating their existing pain points, including providing them with an unrivaled value, an exceptional experience and implementing signature Un-carrier initiatives that have changed wireless for good.

Proposed Sprint Transactions

On April 29, 2018, we entered into the Business Combination Agreement with Sprint to merge in 2013an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. If the Merger closes, the combined company will be named “T-Mobile” and, as a result of the Merger, is expected to be able to build upon our recently launched foundational 5G network 600 MHz spectrum to deliver transformational broad, deep and nationwide 5G for all, accelerate innovation and increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries. Immediately following the Merger, it is anticipated that DT and SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) will hold, directly or indirectly, on a fully diluted basis, approximately 41.5% and 27.2%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the objective of eliminating customer pain points from the unnecessary complexityremaining approximately 31.3% of the wireless communication industry. Since that time, we have continuedoutstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders, based on closing share prices and certain other assumptions as of December 31, 2019. The consummation of the Merger remains subject to certain closing conditions. We expect the Merger will be permitted to close in early 2020.

For more information regarding our effortsBusiness Combination Agreement, see Note 2 – Business Combinations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

5G Launch

In December 2019, T-Mobile launched America’s first nationwide 5G network, including prepaid 5G with Metro by T-Mobile, covering more than 200 million people and more than 5,000 cities and towns across the launch of additional initiatives of our Un-carrier strategy. During 2016, we launched the following Un-carrier initiatives:United States with 5G.


Magenta Plans

In June 2016,2019, we introduced #GetThanked, a history-making move dedicated exclusively to saying “thank you” to our customers. This program, offered to our customers as part of their T-Mobile service: (i) offers eligible new (through December 31, 2016) or existing (as of June 6, 2016) customers ownership in the Company with a free share of T-

Mobile stock or an additional share of T-Mobile stock for every new active account each customer refers through December 31, 2016, subject to a maximum of 100 shares in a calendar year, (ii) enables eligible customers who download the T-Mobile Tuesday app to be informed about and to redeem products and services offered by participating business partners each Tuesday and (iii) offers eligible customers a full hour of free in-flight Wi-Fi on their smartphone on all Gogo-equipped domestic flights.

In September 2016, we introducedrebranded our T-Mobile ONE plan, a move that gives our customers unlimited calls, unlimited text and unlimited high-speed 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) data. On T-Mobile ONE, video typically streams at DVD (480p) quality and tethering is at maximum 3G speeds. Customers can choose to add on additional features to T-Mobile ONE for an additional cost. On T-Mobile ONE Plus plans to Magenta and Magenta Plus.

TVision Home

In April 2019, we introduced TVisionTM Home, a rebranded and upgraded version of Layer3 TV. TVisionTM Home delivers what customers also receive unlimited High Definition Video Day Passes, Voicemail to Text, NameID, unlimited Gogo in-flight internet passes on capable domestic flightswant most from high-end home TV, including a premium TV experience and up to two times faster speeds when traveling abroadHD and 4K channels. TVisionTM Home launched in 140+ countries and destinations. On eight markets.

30

T-Mobile ONE Plus International, customers receive the benefits of T-Mobile ONE Plus as well as free and reduced calling from the U.S. to foreign countries and unlimited high-speed 4G LTE mobile hotspot data.MONEY


In January 2017,April 2019, we introduced, Un-carrier Next, where monthly wireless service feeslaunched T-Mobile MONEY nationwide, offering customers a no-fee, interest-earning, mobile-first checking account which can be opened and all taxesmanaged from customers’ smartphones. Accounts are included in the advertised monthly recurring charge for T-Mobile ONE. We also unveiled Kickback on T-Mobile ONE, where participating customers who use 2 GB or lessheld at BankMobile, a Division of data in a month, will get up to a $10 credit on their next month’s bill per qualifying line. In addition, we introduced the Un-contract for T-Mobile ONE with the first-ever price guarantee on an unlimited 4G LTE plan which allows T-Mobile ONE customers to keep their price for service until they decide to change it.Customers Bank, member Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.


Our ability to acquire and retain branded customers is important to our business in the generation of revenues and we believe our Un-carrier strategy, along with ongoing network improvements, has been successful in attracting and retaining customers as evidenced by continued branded customer growth and improved branded postpaid phone and branded prepaid customer churn.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014# Change % Change # Change % Change(in thousands)201920182017# Change% Change# Change% Change
Net customer additions           �� Net customer additions
Branded postpaid customers4,097
 4,510
 4,886
 (413) (9)% (376) (8)%Branded postpaid customers4,515  4,459  3,620  56  %839  23 %
Branded prepaid customers2,508
 1,315
 1,244
 1,193
 91 % 71
 6 %Branded prepaid customers339  460  855  (121) (26)%(395) (46)%
Total branded customers6,605
 5,825
 6,130
 780
 13 % (305) (5)%Total branded customers4,854  4,919  4,475  (65) (1)%444  10 %


Year Ended December 31,Bps Change 2019 Versus 2018Bps Change 2018 Versus 2017
201920182017
Branded postpaid phone churn0.89 %1.01 %1.18 %-12 bps-17 bps
Branded prepaid churn3.82 %3.96 %4.04 %-14 bps-8 bps
 Year Ended December 31, Bps Change 2016 Versus 2015 Bps Change 2015 Versus 2014
2016 2015 2014 
Branded postpaid phone churn1.30% 1.39% 1.58% -9 bps -19 bps
Branded prepaid churn3.88% 4.45% 4.76% -57 bps -31 bps


Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year

Leases

On SeptemberJanuary 1, 2016,2019, we sold our marketing and distribution rightsadopted the new lease standard. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to certain existing T-Mobile co-branded customers to a current MVNO partnerthe Consolidated Financial Statements for nominal consideration (the “MVNO Transaction”). Upon the sale, the MVNO Transaction resulted in a transfer of 1,365,000 branded postpaid phone customers and 326,000 branded prepaid customers to wholesale customers. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, revenue for these customers is recorded within wholesale revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Additionally,information regarding the impact of our adoption of the MVNO Transaction resulted in improvements to branded postpaid phone churn for year ended December 31, 2016.new lease standard.

During the year ended December 
31 2016, a handset OEM announced recalls on certain

Table of its smartphone devices. As a result, we recorded no revenue associated with the device sales to customers and impaired the devices to their net realizable value. The OEM has agreed to reimburse T-Mobile for direct and indirect costs associated with the recall, as such, we have recorded an amount due from the OEM as an offset to the loss recorded in Cost of equipment sales and the costs incurred within Selling, general and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and a reduction to Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Contents


Results of Operations


2016 Highlights

Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018

Total revenues of $45.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $5.2$1.7 billion, or 16%4%, to $37.2 billion in 2016 primarily driven by growth in service and equipmentService revenues, partially offset by a decrease in Equipment revenues, as further discussed below. The MVNO Transaction shifted Branded postpaid revenues to Wholesale revenues, but did not materially impact total revenues.


Service revenues of $34.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $3.0$2.0 billion, or 12%6%, to $27.8 billion in 2016 primarily due to growth in our average branded customer base as a result of strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives anddriven by the success of our MetroPCS brand and continued growth in existing and Greenfield markets, including the growing success of new markets.customer segments and rate plans such as Unlimited 55+, Military, Business and Essentials and growth in other connected devices and wearables, specifically the Apple Watch, partially offset by lower postpaid phone and prepaid Average Revenue Per User (“ARPU”).


Equipment revenues increased $2.0of $9.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, decreased $169 million, or 30%2%, primarily due to $8.7 billion in 2016 primarily as a result of higher lease revenues, which are recognized over the lease term, resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the second quarter of 2015, an increasedecrease in the number of devices sold, excluding purchased leased devices, and a decrease in lease revenues, partially offset by higher average revenue per device sold.sold, excluding purchased leased devices.


Operating income of $5.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $413 million, or 8%, primarily due to higher Service revenues, partially offset by higher Selling, general and administrative expenses and higher Cost of services. Operating income included the following:
The impact of Merger-related costs was $620 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $196 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The impact from commission costs capitalized and amortized beginning upon the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, reduced Operating income by $337 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to year ended December 31, 2018.
The positive impact of hurricane-related reimbursements, net of costs, was $158 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant impacts from hurricanes for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The positive impact of the new lease standard of approximately $195 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Net income of $3.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $580 million, or 20%, primarily due to higher Operating income and lower Interest expense to affiliates and Interest expense, partially offset by higher Income tax expense. Net income included the following:
The impact of Merger-related costs was $501 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $180 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The impact from commission costs capitalized and amortized, beginning upon the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, reduced Net income by $249 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to year ended December 31, 2018.
The positive impact of hurricane-related reimbursements, net of costs, was $99 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant impacts from hurricanes for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The positive impact of the new lease standard of approximately $175 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, of $13.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $985 million, or 8%, primarily due to higher Operating income driven by the factors described above. Merger-related costs are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. See “Performance Measures” for additional information.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $6.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $2.9 billion, or 75%. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information.

Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, of $4.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $767 million, or 22%. Free Cash Flow includes $442 million and $86 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information.

32

Summary of our consolidated financial results:
Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  $1,811  %$1,414  %
Branded prepaid revenues9,543  9,598  9,380  (55) (1)%218  %
Wholesale revenues1,279  1,183  1,102  96  %81  %
Roaming and other service revenues499  349  230  150  43 %119  52 %
Total service revenues33,994  31,992  30,160  2,002  %1,832  %
Equipment revenues9,840  10,009  9,375  (169) (2)%634  %
Other revenues1,164  1,309  1,069  (145) (11)%240  22 %
Total revenues44,998  43,310  40,604  1,688  %2,706  %
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below6,622  6,307  6,100  315  %207  %
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below11,899  12,047  11,608  (148) (1)%439  %
Selling, general and administrative14,139  13,161  12,259  978  %902  %
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  130  %502  %
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) —  NM  235  (100)%
Total operating expenses39,276  38,001  35,716  1,275  %2,285  %
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  413  %421  %
Other income (expense)
Interest expense(727) (835) (1,111) 108  (13)%276  (25)%
Interest expense to affiliates(408) (522) (560) 114  (22)%38  (7)%
Interest income24  19  17   26 % 12 %
Other expense, net(8) (54) (73) 46  (85)%19  (26)%
Total other expense, net(1,119) (1,392) (1,727) 273  (20)%335  (19)%
Income before income taxes4,603  3,917  3,161  686  18 %756  24 %
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,135) (1,029) 1,375  (106) 10 %(2,404) (175)%
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  $580  20 %$(1,648) (36)%
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,925  75 %$68  %
Net cash used in investing activities(4,125) (579) (6,745) (3,546) 612 %6,166  (91)%
Net cash used in financing activities(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 962  (29)%(1,969) 144 %
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA$13,383  $12,398  $11,213  $985  %$1,185  11 %
Free Cash Flow4,319  3,552  2,725  767  22 %827  30 %


33

The following discussion and analysis are for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018 unless otherwise stated. For a discussion and analysis of the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the same period in 2017 please refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 7, 2019.

Total revenues increased $1.7 billion, or 84%4%, to $3.8as discussed below.

Branded postpaid revenues increased $1.8 billion, or 9%, primarily from:

Higher average branded postpaid phone customers, primarily from growth in 2016 primarily due toour customer base driven by the continued growth in existing and Greenfield markets, including the growing success of new customer segments and rate plans such as Unlimited 55+, Military, Business and Essentials; and
Higher average branded postpaid other customers, driven by higher total revenues as well as increased gains on disposals of spectrum licenses,other connected devices and wearables, specifically the Apple Watch; partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization from an increase
Lower branded postpaid phone ARPU. See “Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU” in the numberPerformance Measures” section of devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand Program, higher costs of equipment salesthis MD&A.

Branded prepaid revenues were essentially flat.

Wholesale revenues increased $96 million, or 8%, primarily from an increasethe continued success of our MVNO partnerships.

Roaming and other service revenues increased $150 million, or 43%, primarily from increases in domestic and international roaming revenues, including growth from Sprint.

Equipment revenues decreased $169 million, or 2%, primarily from:

A decrease of $94 million in device sales revenues, excluding purchased leased devices, primarily from:
A 7% decrease in the number of devices sold, and a higherexcluding purchased leased devices; partially offset by
Higher average costrevenue per device and higher Selling, general and administrative expenses to support customer growth and retention.

Net income increased $727 million, or 99%, to $1.5 billion in 2016 primarily due to higher operating income driven by the factors described above, partially offset by higher interest expense related to higher average debt and higher income tax expense. Additionally, 2016 included $509 million of net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses compared to $100 million in 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $3.0 billion, or 41%, to $10.4 billion in 2016 primarily from higher service revenues and gains on disposal of spectrum licenses, partially offset by increases in selling, general and administrative expenses to support customer growth. Lower losses on equipment in 2016sold primarily due to an increase in lease revenues resulting from the launchhigh-end device mix; and
A decrease of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the second quarter of 2015. Revenues associated with leased devices are recognized over the lease term.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $721 million, or 13%, to $6.1 billion in 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net non-cash income and expenses included in Net income primarily due to changes in Depreciation and Amortization, Deferred income tax expense and Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses expense, as well as an increase in Net income. The increase was partially offset by an increase in net cash outflows from changes in working capital.

Free Cash Flow increased $743 million, or 108%, to $1.4 billion in 2016. The increase was primarily from higher net cash provided by operating activities as discussed above. Cash purchases of property and equipment includes capitalized interest of $142 million and $246$93 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.


Set forth below is a summary of our consolidated results:
 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
(in millions)2016 2015 2014$ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Revenues             
Branded postpaid revenues$18,138
 $16,383
 $14,392
 $1,755
 11 % $1,991
 14 %
Branded prepaid revenues8,553
 7,553
 6,986
 1,000
 13 % 567
 8 %
Wholesale revenues903
 692
 731
 211
 30 % (39) (5)%
Roaming and other service revenues250
 193
 266
 57
 30 % (73) (27)%
Total service revenues27,844
 24,821
 22,375
 3,023
 12 % 2,446
 11 %
Equipment revenues8,727
 6,718
 6,789
 2,009
 30 % (71) (1)%
Other revenues671
 514
 400
 157
 31 % 114
 29 %
Total revenues37,242
 32,053
 29,564
 5,189
 16 % 2,489
 8 %
Operating expenses             
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below5,731
 5,554
 5,788
 177
 3 % (234) (4)%
Cost of equipment sales10,819
 9,344
 9,621
 1,475
 16 % (277) (3)%
Selling, general and administrative11,378
 10,189
 8,863
 1,189
 12 % 1,326
 15 %
Depreciation and amortization6,243
 4,688
 4,412
 1,555
 33 % 276
 6 %
Cost of MetroPCS business combination104
 376
 299
 (272) (72)% 77
 26 %
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses(835) (163) (840) (672) NM
 677
 (81)%
Other, net
 
 5
 
 NM
 (5) NM
Total operating expenses33,440
 29,988
 28,148
 3,452
 12 % 1,840
 7 %
Operating income3,802
 2,065
 1,416
 1,737
 84 % 649
 46 %
Other income (expense)             
Interest expense(1,418) (1,085) (1,073) (333) 31 % (12) 1 %
Interest expense to affiliates(312) (411) (278) 99
 (24)% (133) 48 %
Interest income261
 420
 359
 (159) (38)% 61
 17 %
Other expense, net(6) (11) (11) 5
 (45)% 
  %
Total other expense, net(1,475) (1,087) (1,003) (388) 36 % (84) 8 %
Income before income taxes2,327
 978
 413
 1,349
 138 % 565
 137 %
Income tax expense(867) (245) (166) (622) 254 % (79) 48 %
Net income$1,460
 $733
 $247
 $727
 99 % $486
 197 %
              
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,135
 $5,414
 $4,146
 $721
 13 % $1,268
 31 %
Net cash used in investing activities(5,680) (9,560) (7,246) 3,880
 (41)% (2,314) 32 %
Net cash provided by financing activities463
 3,413
 2,524
 (2,950) (86)% 889
 35 %
              
Non-GAAP Financial Measures             
Adjusted EBITDA$10,391
 $7,393
 $5,636
 $2,998
 41 % $1,757
 31 %
Free Cash Flow1,433
 690
 (171) 743
 108 % 861
 (504)%
NM - Not Meaningful

Comparing 2016 Results with 2015 Results

Total revenues increased $5.2 billion or 16% primarily due to:

Branded postpaid revenues increased $1.8 billion or 11% primarily from:

A 13% increase in the number of average branded postpaid phone and mobile broadband customers, driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotions for services and devices;
Higher device insurance program revenues primarily from customer growth; and
Higher regulatory program revenues; partially offset by
An increase in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash; and
The impact of reduced Branded postpaid revenues resulting from the MVNO Transaction.

Branded prepaid revenues increased $1.0 billion or 13% primarily from:

A 13% increase in the number of average branded prepaid customers driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand; and
Continued growth in new markets.

Wholesale revenues increased $211 million or 30% primarily from:

The impact of the increased Wholesale revenues resulting from the MVNO Transaction;
Growth in customers of certain MVNO partners; and
An increase in data usage per customer.

Roaming and other service revenues increased $57 million or 30% primarily due to higher international roaming revenues driven by an increase in inbound roaming volumes.

Equipment revenues increased$2.0 billion or 30% primarily from:

An increase of $1.2 billion in lease revenues resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the second quarter of 2015. Revenues associated with leased devices are recognized over the lease term.
An increase of $570 million in device sales revenues primarily due to a 9% increase in thelower number of customer devices sold. Device salesunder lease, partially offset by higher revenue is recognized at the time of sale.per device under lease.


Gross EIP device financing to our customers increased by $923 million to $6.1 billion primarily due to an increase in devices financed due to our focus on EIP sales in 2016, compared to focus on devices financed on JUMP! On Demand after the launch of the program at the end of the second quarter of 2015.

Other revenues increased $157 decreased $145 million, or 31%11%, primarily from:


Higher revenue from revenue share agreements with third parties; and
An increaseA decrease of $185 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, in co-location rental incomerevenue from leasing space on wireless communication towersthe adoption of the new lease standard; and
Hurricane-related reimbursements of $71 million included in the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to third parties.no impact from hurricanes in the year ended December 31, 2019; partially offset by

Higher advertising revenues; and
Higher spectrum lease revenue from the reciprocal long-term lease agreement with Sprint executed during the three months ended December 31, 2018.

Our operating expenses consist of the following categories:


Cost of services consists primarily ofincludes costs directly attributable to providing wireless service through the operation of our network, including direct switch and cell site costs, such as rent, network access and transport costs, utilities, maintenance, associated labor costs, long distance costs, regulatory program costs, roaming fees paid to other carriers and data content costs. In addition, certain costs for customer appreciation programs are included in Cost of services.

34


Cost of equipment sales consists primarily ofincludes costs of devices and accessories sold to customers and dealers, device costs to fulfill insurance and warranty claims, costs related to returned and purchased leased devices, write-downs of inventory related to shrinkage and obsolescence, and shipping and handling costs.


Selling, general and administrative consists ofprimarily includes costs not directly attributable to providing wireless service for the operation of sales, customer care and corporate activities. These include commissions paid to dealers and retail employees for customer activations and upgrades, labor and facilities costs associated with retail sales force and administrative space, marketing and promotional costs, customer support and billing, bad debt expense, losses from sales of receivables and back office administrative support activities.


Operating expenses increased $3.5$1.3 billion, or 12%3%, primarily due to:

from higher Selling, general and administrative expenses and Cost of services as discussed below.

Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization,increased $177$315 million, or 3%5%, primarily from:


Higher regulatory program costs andfor employee-related expenses, associated with network expansion, expenses from new leases and repair and maintenance;
Hurricane-related reimbursements, net of costs, of $76 million included in the build-out of our networkyear ended December 31, 2018, compared to utilize our 700 MHz A-Blockno significant impact from hurricanes in the year ended December 31, 2019; and
Higher spectrum licenses, including higher employee-related costs;lease expense from the reciprocal long-term lease agreement with Sprint executed during the three months ended December 31, 2018; partially offset by
Lower long distance and toll costs; and
Synergies realizedThe positive impact of the new lease standard of approximately $380 million in the year ended December 31, 2019, resulting from the decommissioning ofdecrease in the MetroPCS CDMA network.average lease term and the change in accounting conclusion for certain sale-leaseback sites; and

Lower regulatory program costs.

Cost of equipment sales increased $1.5 billion, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, decreased $148 million, or 16%1%, primarily from:


A 9% increasedecrease of $98 million in device cost of equipment sales, excluding purchased leased devices, primarily from:
A 7% decrease in the number of devices sold; andsold, excluding purchased leased devices, partially offset by
AnHigher average cost per device sold due to an increase in the impact fromhigh-end device mix;
A decrease of $30 million in returned and purchasedhandset expenses due to reduced device sales;
A decrease in leased devices.

Under our JUMP! On Demand program, the cost of the leased wireless device is capitalized and recognized as depreciation expense over the term of the lease rather than recognized as cost of equipment sales, when theprimarily due to lower leased device is deliveredreturns; and
A decrease in extended warranty costs, primarily due to a lower volume of purchased handsets for warranty replacement; partially offset by
An increase in costs related to the customer. Additionally, upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device.  Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lowerliquidation of cost or market with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales.inventory.


Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 billion$978 million, or 12%7%, primarily from strategic investments to support our growing customer base including higher:from:


Employee-relatedAn increase of $424 million in Merger-related costs;
Commissions driven byHigher commissions expense resulting from an increase of $337 million in branded customer additions; and
Promotional costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $1.6 billion or 33% primarily from:

$1.5 billion in depreciation expense related to devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand program launched atcommission costs that were capitalized beginning upon the endadoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018;
Higher employee-related costs primarily due to annual pay increases and growth in headcount; and
Higher costs related to outsourced functions; partially offset by
Lower commissions expense from lower branded prepaid customer additions and compensation structure changes; and
Lower advertising costs.

35

Depreciation and amortization increased $130 million or 2%, primarily from:

Network expansion, including the second quartercontinued deployment of 2015. Under our JUMP! On Demand program,low band spectrum, including 600 MHz, and the cost of a leased wireless device is depreciated over the lease term to its estimated residual value. The total number of devices under lease was higher year-over-year, resulting in higher depreciation expense; and
The continued build-outnationwide launch of our 4G LTE network.5G network; and

Cost of MetroPCS business combination decreased $272 million or 72% primarily from lower network decommissioning costs. In 2014, we began decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant network cell sites as part of the business combination. On July 1, 2015, we officially completed the shutdown of the MetroPCS CDMA network. Network decommissioningHigher costs which are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, primarily relaterelated to the acceleration of lease costsdepreciation for cell sites that would have otherwise been recognized as cost of services over the remaining lease term had we not decommissioned the cell sites. Although we expectcertain assets due to incur additional network decommissioning costs in 2017, these costs are not expected to be significant.our accelerated 600 MHz build-out and 5G nationwide launch; partially offset by

Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses increased $672 million primarilyLower depreciation expense resulting from a $636 million gain from a spectrum license transaction with AT&T recorded in the first quarterlower total number of 2016 and $199 million from other transactions in 2016, compared to $163 million in 2015. See Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.customer devices under lease.


Net income increased $727 million or 99% primarily from:

Operating income, the components of which are discussed above, increased $1.7 billion$413 million, or 84% and
8%.


Interest expense to affiliatesdecreased $99$108 million, or 24%13%, primarily from:


ChangesAn increase of $43 million in the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsch Telekom in 2015; partially offset by
Highercapitalized interest rates on certain Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsch Telekom, which were adjusted at reset dates in the second quarter of 2016 and in 2015. Partially offset by:

Income tax expense increased $622 million or 254% primarily from:

Higher income before income taxes; and
A higher effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 37.3% in 2016, compared to 25.1% in 2015. The increase in the effective income tax rate wascosts, primarily due to income tax benefits for discrete income tax items recognized in 2015 that did not impact 2016; partially offset by the recognition of $58 million of excess

tax benefits related to share-based payments following the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2016. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Based on recent earnings in certain jurisdictions, sufficient positive evidence may exist within the next twelve months such that we may release a portion of our valuation allowance.

Interest expense increased $333 million or 31% primarily from:

Higher average debt balances with third parties; and
Lower capitalized interest costs of $83 million primarily due to a higher level of build outbuild-out of our network to utilize our 700600 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses and the nationwide launch of our 5G network;
The redemption in 2015, comparedApril 2018 of an aggregate principal amount of $2.4 billion of Senior Notes, with various interest rates and maturity dates; and
A $34 million reduction in interest expense from the change in accounting conclusion related to 2016.the reassessment of previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites associated with the adoption of the new lease standard.


Interest incomeexpense to affiliates decreased $159$114 million, or 38%22%, primarily from:

An increase of $67 million in capitalized interest costs, primarily due to $166 million lower imputed interest income associated with devices financed through EIP resulting from:

An increase in sales of certain EIP receivables pursuant to our EIP receivables sales arrangement resulting from an increase in the maximum funding commitment in June 2016. Interest associated with EIP receivables is imputed at the time of a device sale and then recognized over the financed installment term. See Note 2 – Equipment Installment Plan Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and
Focus on devices financed on JUMP! On Demand in the thirdbuild-out of our network to utilize our 600 MHz spectrum licenses and fourth quarters of 2015 following the nationwide launch of our 5G network;
Lower interest on $600 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Reset Notes retired in April 2019; and
Lower interest rates achieved through refinancing a total of $2.5 billion of Senior Reset Notes in April 2018.

Other expense, net decreased $46 million, or 85%, primarily from:

An $86 million loss during the programyear ended December 31, 2018, on the early redemption of at$2.5 billion of DT Senior Reset Notes due 2021 and 2022; and
A $32 million loss during the endyear ended December 31, 2018, on the early redemption of $1.0 billion of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022; partially offset by
A $30 million gain during the year ended December 31, 2018, on the sale of auction rate securities which were originally acquired with MetroPCS;
A $25 million bargain purchase gain as part of our purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of Iowa Wireless Services, LLC (“IWS”) and a $15 million gain on our previously held equity interest in IWS, both recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018; and
A $28 million redemption premium on the DT Senior Reset Notes; partially offset by the write-off of embedded derivatives upon redemption of the second quarter 2015.debt which resulted in a gain of $11 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.


We are making an accountingIncome tax expense increased $106 million, or 10%, primarily from:

Higher income before taxes; partially offset by
A reduction of the effective income tax rate to 24.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 26.3% for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily from:
A $115 million increase in income tax expense during the year ended December��31, 2018, due to a tax regime change in 2017certain state tax jurisdictions; and
The favorable rate impact of certain non-recurring legal entity restructuring in 2019.

36

Net income, the components of which are discussed above, increased $580 million, or 20%, primarily due to include imputedhigher Operating income and lower interest associated with EIP receivables in Other revenues in our Consolidated Statementsexpense to affiliates and interest expense. Net income included the following:

Merger-related costs of Comprehensive Income. $501 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to Merger-related costs of $180 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2018;
The negative impact from this accounting change is expectedcommission costs capitalized and amortized beginning upon the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, net of tax, of $249 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to beyear ended December 31, 2018;
Hurricane-related reimbursements, net of costs, of $99 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant impacts from hurricanes for the year ended December 31, 2019; and
The positive impact of the new lease standard of approximately $0.2 to $0.3 billion in 2017.$175 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2019.


Net income during 2016 and 2015 included net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $509 million and $100 million, respectively.

Guarantor Subsidiaries


Pursuant to the applicable indentures and supplemental indentures, the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties issued by T-Mobile USA (“Issuer”) is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by T-Mobile
(“Parent”) and certain of the Issuer’s 100% owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The financial condition and results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries is substantially similar to our consolidated financial condition.

In 2019, certain Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries became Guarantor Subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentations. The most significant components of the financial condition of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018Change
(in millions)$%
Other current assets$684  $644  $40  %
Property and equipment, net194  246  (52) (21)%
Tower obligations2,161  2,173  (12) (1)%
Total stockholders' deficit(1,620) (1,454) (166) 11 %
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 Change
(in millions)  $ %
Other current assets$565
 $400
 $165
 41 %
Property and equipment, net375
 454
 (79) (17)%
Tower obligations2,221
 2,247
 (26) (1)%
Total stockholders' deficit(1,374) (1,359) (15) (1)%


The most significant components of the results of operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Change
(in millions)20192018$%
Service revenues$3,003  $2,333  $670  29 %
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization1,207  1,010  197  20 %
Selling, general and administrative989  892  97  11 %
Total comprehensive income608  301  307  102 %
 Year Ended December 31, Change
(in millions)2016 2015$ %
Service revenues$2,023
 $1,669
 $354
 21 %
Cost of equipment sales1,027
 720
 307
 43 %
Selling, general and administrative868
 733
 135
 18 %
Total comprehensive income24
 60
 (36) (60)%


The change to the results of operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries was primarily from:
The increases in
Higher Service revenues, Cost of equipment sales and Selling, general and administrative were primarily the result ofdue to an increase in activity of the non-guarantor subsidiaryNon-Guarantor Subsidiary that provides device insurance,premium services, primarily driven by a net increase in rates as well as growth in our customer base. base related to a premium service that launched at the end of August 2018 and sales of a new product; partially offset by
Higher Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, primarily due to higher cost devices used for device insurance claims fulfillment, partially offset by an increase in device liquidations; and
Higher Selling, general and administrative expenses, primarily due to higher costs related to outsourced functions.

All other results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. See Note 1518 – Guarantor Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements.


Comparing 2015 Results with 2014 Results

Total Revenues increased $2.5 billion or 8% primarily due to:

Branded postpaid revenues increased $2.0 billion or 14% primarily from:

Growth in the number of average branded postpaid and mobile broadband customers, driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotions for services and devices;
Increased customer adoption of upgrade and insurance programs; and
Increased regulatory program revenues; partially offset by
Lower branded postpaid phone ARPU.

Branded prepaid revenues increased $567 million or 8% primarily from:

Growth in the number of average branded prepaid customers driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities; and
Continued growth in expansion markets.

Wholesale revenues decreased $39 million or 5% primarily from:

Revised agreements with certain MVNO partners in 2015; partially offset by
Growth in customers of certain MVNO partners.

Roaming and other service revenues decreased $73 million or 27% primarily from:

Lower international roaming revenues driven by changes in contractual arrangements with certain roaming partners; and
A reduction in early termination fees.

Equipment revenues decreased $71 million or 1% primarily from:

Lower average revenue per device sold, due in part to the impact of customers shifting to leasing higher-end devices under our JUMP! On Demand program; partially offset by
Growth in the number of devices and accessories sold.

With JUMP! On Demand, revenues associated with leased wireless devices are recognized over the term of the lease rather than when the device is delivered to the customer. Despite the increase in the number of devices leased in 2015 following the launch of JUMP! On Demand, the unit volume of device sales increased 5% in 2015, compared to 2014.

We financed $5.2 billion of devices through EIP during 2015, a decrease from $5.8 billion in 2014, primarily due to a decline in devices financed through EIP as customers increasingly shifted to leasing devices with JUMP! On Demand.

Other revenues increased$114 million or 29% primarily attributable to higher non-service revenues from revenue share agreements with third parties.

Operating expenses increased $1.8 billion or 7% primarily due to:

Cost of services decreased $234 million or 4% primarily from:

Synergies realized from the decommissioning of the MetroPCS CDMA network;
Lower lease expense associated with spectrum license lease agreements; and
A reduction in certain regulatory program costs; partially offset by
Increases related to our network expansion and build-out of our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum.


Cost of equipment sales decreased $277 million or 3% primarily from:

Lower average cost per device sold, mainly due to the impact of customers shifting to leasing higher-end devices with JUMP! On Demand; partially offset by
Growth in the number of devices and accessories sold.

With JUMP! On Demand, the cost of the leased wireless device is capitalized and recognized as depreciation expense over the term of the lease rather than recognized as cost of equipment sales when the device is delivered to the customer. Despite the increase in the number of devices leased in 2015 following the launch of JUMP! On Demand, the unit volume of device sales increased 5% in 2015, compared to 2014.

Selling, general and administrative increased $1.3 billion or 15% primarily from supporting the growing customer base, which also increased 15% and reflects increases in:

Employee-related costs;
Promotional costs;
Commissions; and
Bad debt expense and losses from sales of receivables primarily resulting from growth in the customer base and in the EIP program.

Depreciation and amortization increased $276 million or 6% primarily from $312 million in depreciation expense related to devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015. Under our JUMP! On Demand program, the cost of a leased wireless device is depreciated over the lease term to its estimated residual value. The total number of devices under lease was higher year-over-year, resulting in higher depreciation expense.

Cost of MetroPCS business combination increased $77 million or 26% primarily from higher network decommissioning costs associated with the business combination. In 2014, we began decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant network cell sites. On July 1, 2015, T-Mobile officially completed the shutdown of the MetroPCS CDMA network. Network decommissioning costs, which are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, primarily relate to the acceleration of lease costs for cell sites that would have otherwise been recognized as cost of services over the remaining lease term had we not decommissioned the cell sites.

Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses decreased $677 million or 81% primarily from:

$163 million in 2015 which primarily consisted of a non-cash gain of $139 million from spectrum license transactions with Verizon recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015; as compared to
$840 million in 2014 which primarily consisted of non-cash gains from spectrum license transactions with Verizon, and to a lesser extent, a non-cash gain from a spectrum license transaction with AT&T during the fourth quarter of 2014.

See Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statementsincluded in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.

Net income increased $486 million or 197% primarily from:

Operating income, the components
37


Interest income increased $61 million or 17% primarily attributable to higher interest income from devices financed through EIP. Interest associated with EIP receivables is imputed at the time of sale and then recognized over the financed installment term. Partially offset by:

Interest expense to affiliates increased $133 million or 48% primarily from:

Changes in the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with the Senior Reset Notes issued     to Deutsche Telekom; partially offset by
Lower capitalized interest costs associated with the build out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block     spectrum licenses.

Income tax expenseincreased$79 million or 48% primarily from:

Higher income before income taxes; partially offset by
A lower effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 25.1% in 2015, compared to 40.2% in 2014. The     decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to the impact of discrete income tax items     recognized in 2015, including changes in state and local income tax laws and the recognition of foreign tax credits.

Interest expense increased $12 million or 1% primarily from:

Higher debt balances with third parties; partially offset by
Lower capitalized interest costs associated with the build out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz     A-Block spectrum licenses.

Net income during 2015 and 2014 included net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $100 million and $515 million, respectively.

Guarantor Subsidiaries

The financial condition and results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries is substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated financial condition.

The most significant components of the financial condition of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
 Change
(in millions)  $ %
Other current assets$400
 $249
 $151
 61 %
Property and equipment, net454
 537
 (83) (15)%
Tower obligations2,247
 2,250
 (3)  %
Total stockholders' deficit(1,359) (1,451) 92
 (6)%

The most significant components of the results of operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, Change
(in millions)2015 2014$ %
Service revenues$1,669
 $1,302
 $367
 28%
Cost of equipment sales720
 702
 18
 3%
Selling, general and administrative733
 518
 215
 42%
Total comprehensive income (loss)60
 (38) 98
 258%

The increases in Service revenues, Cost of equipment sales and Selling, general and administrative were primarily the result of an increase in activity of the non-guarantor subsidiary that provides device insurance, primarily driven by growth in our customer base. All other results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are substantially similar to our consolidated results of operations. See Note 15 – Guarantor Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Performance Measures


In managing our business and assessing financial performance, we supplement the information provided by our financial statements with other operating or statistical data and non-GAAP financial measures. These operating and financial measures are utilized by our management to evaluate our operating performance and, in certain cases, our ability to meet liquidity requirements. Although companies in the wireless industry may not define each of these measures in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures facilitate comparisons with other companies in the wireless industry on key operating and financial measures.



Total Customers


A customer is generally defined as a SIM cardnumber with a unique T-Mobile identity numberidentifier which is associated with an account that generates revenue. Branded customers generally include customers that are qualified either for postpaid service utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS or mobile broadbandother connected devices (including tablets)which includes tablets and SyncUp DRIVE™, where they generally pay after receiving service, or prepaid service, where they generally pay in advance. Our branded prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile. Wholesale customers include M2M and MVNO customers that operate on our network but are managed by wholesale partners.


Starting with the three months ended March 31, 2020, we plan to discontinue reporting wholesale customers and instead focus on branded customers and wholesale revenues, which we consider more relevant than the number of wholesale customers given the expansion of M2M and IoT products.

On July 18, 2019, we entered into an agreement whereby certain T-Mobile branded prepaid products will now be offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner. Upon the effective date, the agreement resulted in a base adjustment to reduce branded prepaid customers by 616,000, as we no longer actively support the branded product offering. Prospectively, new customer activity associated with these products is recorded within wholesale customers and revenue for these customers is recorded within Wholesale revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The following table sets forth the number of ending customers:
As of December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in thousands)201920182017# Change% Change# Change% Change
Customers, end of period
Branded postpaid phone customers40,345  37,224  34,114  3,121  %3,110  %
Branded postpaid other customers6,689  5,295  3,933  1,394  26 %1,362  35 %
Total branded postpaid customers47,034  42,519  38,047  4,515  11 %4,472  12 %
Branded prepaid customers (1)
20,860  21,137  20,668  (277) (1)%469  %
Total branded customers67,894  63,656  58,715  4,238  %4,941  %
Wholesale customers (1)
18,152  15,995  13,870  2,157  13 %2,125  15 %
Total customers, end of period86,046  79,651  72,585  6,395  %7,066  10 %
Adjustment to branded prepaid customers (1)
(616) —  —  (616) NM—  — %
(1) On July 18, 2019, we entered into an agreement whereby certain T-Mobile branded prepaid products will now be offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner. As a result, we included a base adjustment in Q3 2019 to reduce branded prepaid customers by 616,000. Prospectively, new customer activity associated with these products is recorded within wholesale customers.

Branded Customers

Total branded customers increased 4,238,000, or 7%, primarily from:

Higher branded postpaid phone customers driven by the growing success of new customer segments and rate plans such as Unlimited 55+, Military, Business and Essentials and continued growth in existing and Greenfield markets, along with promotional activities and lower churn; and
Higher branded postpaid other customers, primarily due to strength in additions from other connected devices; partially offset by
Lower branded prepaid customers driven primarily by a reduction of 616,000 customers resulting from a base adjustment for certain T-Mobile branded prepaid products now being offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner, partially offset by the continued success of our prepaid brands due to promotional activities and rate plan offers.
38

 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 31, 2014 % Change 2016 Versus 2015 % Change 2015 Versus 2014
(in thousands)  
Customers, end of period         
Branded postpaid phone customers31,297
 29,355
 25,844
 7% 14%
Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers3,130
 2,340
 1,341
 34% 74%
Total branded postpaid customers34,427
 31,695
 27,185
 9% 17%
Branded prepaid customers19,813
 17,631
 16,316
 12% 8%
Total branded customers54,240
 49,326
 43,501
 10% 13%
Wholesale customers17,215
 13,956
 11,517
 23% 21%
Total customers, end of period71,455
 63,282
 55,018
 13% 15%
Wholesale


Wholesale customers increased 2,157,000, or 13%, primarily due to the continued success of our M2M and MVNO partnerships.

Net Customer Additions

The following table sets forth the number of net customer additions:
Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in thousands)201920182017# Change% Change# Change% Change
Net customer additions
Branded postpaid phone customers3,121  3,097  2,817  24  %280  10 %
Branded postpaid other customers1,394  1,362  803  32  %559  70 %
Total branded postpaid customers4,515  4,459  3,620  56  %839  23 %
Branded prepaid customers (1)
339  460  855  (121) (26)%(395) (46)%
Total branded customers4,854  4,919  4,475  (65) (1)%444  10 %
Wholesale customers (1)
2,157  2,125  1,183  32  %942  80 %
Total net customer additions7,011  7,044  5,658  (33) — %1,386  24 %
 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014# Change % Change # Change % Change
Net customer additions             
Branded postpaid phone customers3,307
 3,511
 4,047
 (204) (6)% (536) (13)%
Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers790
 999
 839
 (209) (21)% 160
 19 %
Total branded postpaid customers4,097
 4,510
 4,886
 (413) (9)% (376) (8)%
Branded prepaid customers2,508
 1,315
 1,244
 1,193
 91 % 71
 6 %
Total branded customers6,605
 5,825
 6,130
 780
 13 % (305) (5)%
Wholesale customers1,568
 2,439
 2,204
 (871) (36)% 235
 11 %
Total net customer additions8,173
 8,264
 8,334
 (91) (1)% (70) (1)%
Transfer from branded postpaid phone customers(1,365) 
 
 (1,365) 100 % 
  %
Transfer from branded prepaid customers(326) 
 
 (326) 100 % 
  %
Transfer to wholesale customers1,691
 
 
 1,691
 100 % 
  %

The(1) On July 18, 2019, we entered into an agreement whereby certain T-Mobile branded prepaid products will now be offered and distributed by a current MVNO Transaction resultedpartner. As a result, we included a base adjustment in a transfer of 1,365,000 branded postpaid phone customers and 326,000Q3 2019 to reduce branded prepaid customers toby 616,000. Prospectively, new customer activity associated with these products is recorded within wholesale customers on September 1, 2016. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, net customer additions for these customers are included within Wholesale customers. Ending customers as of December 31, 2016 reflect the transfers in connection with the MVNO Transaction.


Branded Customers


Total branded net customer additions increased 780,000,decreased 65,000, or 13%1%, in 2016 primarily from:


HigherLower branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to the successimpact of our MetroPCS brand, continued growthcompetitor promotional activities in new markets and distribution expansion,the marketplace, partially offset by an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating tolower churn; partially offset by
Higher branded postpaid plans; partially offset by
Lower branded postpaid mobile broadbandother net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations resultingadditions from churn on a growing branded postpaid mobile broadband customer base,other connected devices, partially offset by higher grossdeactivations from a growing customer additions;base; and
LowerHigher branded postpaid phone net customer additions primarily due to lower gross customer additions from higher deactivations on a growing customer base, partially offset by lower churn as well as an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans as well as the optimization of our third-party distribution channels.churn.

Total branded net customer additions decreased 305,000, or 5%, in 2015 primarily from:

Lower branded postpaid phone net customer additions primarily due to lower gross customer additions in 2015, compared to 2014, which included the introduction of Un-carrier 4.0 Contract Freedom and certain attractive family rate plan promotions, partially offset by approximately 765,000 qualified branded prepaid customers upgrading to branded postpaid plans in 2015, compared to approximately 420,000 in 2014; partially offset by
Higher branded postpaid mobile broadband net customer additions primarily due to higher gross customer additions driven by promotions for mobile broadband devices, partially offset by higher deactivations resulting from the discontinuation of certain promotional pricing for mobile broadband services and ongoing competitive activity in the marketplace; and
Higher branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to higher gross customer additions driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities and continued growth in new markets, partially offset by approximately 765,000 qualified branded prepaid customers upgrading to branded postpaid plans in 2015, compared to approximately 420,000 in 2014.


Wholesale

Wholesale net customer additions decreased 871,000, or 36%, in 2016 primarily due to higher MVNO deactivations from certain MVNO partners. Going forward, we expect wholesale net customer additions to be significantly lower in 2017, as our MVNO partners deemphasize Lifeline in favor of higher ARPU customer categories.


Wholesale net customer additions increased 235,000,32,000, or 11%2%, in 2015 primarily due to higher additions from the continued success of our M2M and MVNO gross customer additions, partially offset by higher MVNO deactivations.partnerships.


Customers Per Account


Customers per account is calculated by dividing the number of branded postpaid customers as of the end of the period by the number of branded postpaid accounts as of the end of the period. An account may include branded postpaid phone customers and mobile broadband customers.branded postpaid other customers which includes wearables, DIGITS, and other connected devices such as tablets and SyncUp DRIVE™. We believe branded postpaid customers per account provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate our branded postpaid customer base on abase.

The following table sets forth the branded postpaid customers per account basis.account:
As of December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
201920182017# Change% Change# Change% Change
Branded postpaid customers per account3.13  3.03  2.93  0.10  %0.10  %
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 31, 2014 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
   # Change % Change # Change % Change
Branded postpaid customers per account2.86
 2.54
 2.36
 0.32
 13% 0.18
 8%


Branded postpaid customers per account increased in 2016 and 20153% primarily duefrom continued growth of customers on promotionsnew customer segments and rate plans such as Unlimited 55+, Military, Business and Essentials, promotional activities targeting families and increased penetrationthe continued success of mobile broadband devices. Inother connected devices and wearables, specifically tablets and the Apple Watch.

39

Starting with the three months ended March 31, 2020, we plan to report Average Revenue per Postpaid Account or Postpaid ARPA, in addition to our existing ARPU metrics, reflecting the increase in 2016 was impact by the MVNO Transaction.increasing importance of non-phone devices to our customers. We also plan to discontinue reporting branded postpaid customers per account.


Churn


Churn represents the number of customers whose service was disconnected as a percentage of the average number of customers during the specified period. The number of customers whose service was disconnected is presented net of customers that subsequently have their service restored within a certain period of time. We believe that churn provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate customer retention and loyalty.
 Year Ended December 31, Bps Change 2016 Versus 2015 Bps Change 2015 Versus 2014
2016 2015 2014 
Branded postpaid phone churn1.30% 1.39% 1.58% -9 bps -19 bps
Branded prepaid churn3.88% 4.45% 4.76% -57 bps -31 bps


The following table sets forth the churn:
Year Ended December 31,Bps Change 2019 Versus 2018Bps Change 2018 Versus 2017
201920182017
Branded postpaid phone churn0.89 %1.01 %1.18 %-12 bps-17 bps
Branded prepaid churn3.82 %3.96 %4.04 %-14 bps-8 bps

Branded postpaid phone churn decreased 912 basis points, in 2016 primarily from:

The MVNO Transaction as the customers transferred had a higher rate of churn; and
Increasedfrom increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, industry-leading customer service and the overall value of our offerings in the marketplace.offerings.



Branded postpaid phoneprepaid churn decreased 1914 basis points, in 2015 primarily from increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality customer service and the overall valuecontinued success of our offerings in the marketplace, resulting in increased customer satisfactionprepaid brands due to promotional activities and loyalty.rate plan offers.

Branded prepaid churn decreased 57 basis points in 2016 primarily from:

A decrease in certain customers, which have a higher rate of branded prepaid churn;
Strong performance of the MetroPCS brand; and
A methodology change in the third quarter of 2015 as discussed below.

Branded prepaid churn decreased 31 basis points in 2015 primarily from a methodology change during 2015 that had no impact on our reported branded prepaid ending customers or net customer additions, but resulted in computationally lower gross customer additions and deactivations. Revision of prior periods was not practicable because certain historical data was no longer available.


Average Revenue Per User Average Billings Per User


ARPU represents the average monthly service revenue earned from customers. We believe ARPU provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to assess and evaluate our service revenue realization per customer and assist in forecasting our future service revenues generated from our customer base. Branded postpaid phone ARPU excludes mobile broadbandBranded postpaid other customers and related revenues.revenues which includes wearables, DIGITS and other connected devices such as tablets and SyncUp DRIVE™.

Average Billings Per User (“ABPU”) represents the average monthly customer billings, including monthly lease revenues and EIP billings before securitization, per customer. We believe branded postpaid ABPU provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate average branded postpaid customer billings as it is indicative of estimated cash collections, including device financing payments, from our customers each month.


The following tables illustratetable illustrates the calculation of our operating measuresmeasure ARPU and ABPU and reconcile these measuresreconciles this measure to the related service revenues:
(in millions, except average number of customers and ARPU)Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Calculation of Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU
Branded postpaid service revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  $1,811  %$1,414  %
Less: Branded postpaid other revenues(1,344) (1,117) (1,077) (227) 20 %(40) %
Branded postpaid phone service revenues$21,329  $19,745  $18,371  $1,584  %$1,374  %
Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid phone customers (in thousands) and number of months in period38,602  35,458  32,596  3,144  %2,862  %
Branded postpaid phone ARPU$46.04  $46.40  $46.97  $(0.36) (1)%$(0.57) (1)%
Calculation of Branded Prepaid ARPU
Branded prepaid service revenues$9,543  $9,598  $9,380  $(55) (1)%$218  %
Divided by: Average number of branded prepaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period20,955  20,761  20,204  194  %557  %
Branded prepaid ARPU$37.95  $38.53  $38.69  $(0.58) (2)%$(0.16) — %

40

(in millions, except average number of customers, ARPU and ABPU)Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
2016 2015 2014 # Change % Change # Change % Change
Calculation of Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU             
Branded postpaid service revenues$18,138
 $16,383
 $14,392
 $1,755
 11 % $1,991
 14 %
Less: Branded postpaid mobile broadband revenues(773) (588) (261) (185) 31 % (327) 125 %
Branded postpaid phone service revenues$17,365
 $15,795
 $14,131
 $1,570
 10 % $1,664
 12 %
Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid phone customers (in thousands) and number of months in period30,484
 27,604
 23,817
 2,880
 10 % 3,787
 16 %
Branded postpaid phone ARPU$47.47
 $47.68
 $49.44
 $(0.21) NM
 $(1.76) (4)%
              
Calculation of Branded Postpaid ABPU             
Branded postpaid service revenues$18,138
 $16,383
 $14,392
 $1,755
 11 % $1,991
 14 %
EIP billings5,432
 5,494
 3,596
 (62) (1)% 1,898
 53 %
Lease revenues1,416
 224
 
 1,192
 532 % 224
 100 %
Total billings for branded postpaid customers$24,986
 $22,101
 $17,988
 $2,885
 13 % $4,113
 23 %
Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period33,184
 29,341
 24,683
 3,843
 13 % 4,658
 19 %
Branded postpaid ABPU$62.75
 $62.77
 $60.73
 $(0.02) NM
 $2.04
 3 %
              
Calculation of Branded Prepaid ARPU             
Branded prepaid service revenues$8,553
 $7,553
 $6,986
 $1,000
 13 % $567
 8 %
Divided by: Average number of branded prepaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period18,797
 16,704
 15,691
 2,093
 13 % 1,013
 6 %
Branded prepaid ARPU$37.92
 $37.68
 $37.10
 $0.24
 1 % $0.58
 2 %
Table of Contents
NM - Not Meaningful

Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU:ARPU


Branded postpaid phone ARPU decreased $0.21, in 2016$0.36, or 1%, primarily from:due to:


Decreases due to anAn increase in promotional activities, including the non-cash net revenue deferralongoing growth in our Netflix offering, which totaled $0.54 for Data Stash;the year ended December 31, 2019, and decreased branded postpaid phone ARPU by $0.19 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018;
A reduction in regulatory program revenues from the continued adoption of tax inclusive plans; and
A reduction in certain non-recurring charges; partially offset by
Higher premium services revenue; and
The growing success of new customer segments and rate plans.

We expect Branded postpaid phone ARPU in full-year 2020 to be generally stable compared to full-year 2019 within a range of plus 1% to minus 1%.

Branded Prepaid ARPU

Branded prepaid ARPU decreased $0.58, or 2%, primarily due to:

Dilution from promotional activities;activity; and
Growth in our Amazon Prime offering - included as a benefit with certain Metro by T-Mobile unlimited rate plans as of the fourth quarter of 2018 - which impacted branded prepaid ARPU by $0.39 for the year ended December 31, 2019, and decreased branded prepaid ARPU by $0.36 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018; partially offset by
Higher data attach rates;
The positive impact from our T-Mobile ONE rate plans;
The transferremoval of certain branded prepaid customers as part of theassociated with products now offered and distributed by a current MVNO transactionpartner as those customers had lower ARPU;ARPU.
Continued growth of our insurance programs; and
Higher regulatory program revenues.

We are making an accounting change in 2017 to include imputed interest associated with EIP receivables in Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, which will be excluded from branded postpaid phone ARPU.

Branded postpaid phone ARPU decreased $1.76, or 4%, in 2015 primarily from:

Dilution from the continued growth of customers on Simple Choice plans and promotions targeting families; partially offset by
An increase in regulatory program revenues.

Branded Postpaid ABPU:

Branded postpaid ABPU decreased $0.02 in 2016 primarily from:

Lower EIP billings due to the impact of our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015;
Lower branded postpaid phone ARPU, as described above;
Dilution from increased penetration of mobile broadband devices; partially offset by
An increase in lease revenues.

Branded postpaid ABPU increased $2.04, or 3%, in 2015 primarily from:

Growth in devices financed by customers through the EIP and JUMP! on Demand programs; partially offset by
Lower branded postpaid phone ARPU, as described above.

Branded Prepaid ARPU:

Branded prepaid ARPU increased $0.24, or 1%, in 2016 primarily from:

A decrease in certain customers that had lower average branded prepaid ARPU, as well as higher data attach rates; partially offset by
Dilution from growth of customers on rate plan promotions.

Branded prepaid ARPU increased $0.58, or 2%, in 2015 primarily from:

An increase in the mix of branded prepaid customers choosing plans with more data, which generate a higher ARPU; partially offset by
Dilution from growth of customers on rate plan promotions.

Adjusted EBITDA


Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interestInterest expense, net of Interest income, Income tax expense, Depreciation and amortization, non-cash Stock-based compensation and certain income and expenses not reflective of T-Mobile’sour operating performance.

Net income margin represents Net income divided by Service revenues. Adjusted EBITDA margin represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by Service revenues.


Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management to monitor the financial performance of our operations. We use Adjusted EBITDA internally as a metricmeasure to evaluate and compensate our personnel and management for their performance, and as a benchmark to evaluate our operating performance in comparison to our competitors. Management believes analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate overall operating performance and facilitate comparisons with other wireless communications services companies because it is indicative of our ongoing operating performance and trends by excluding the impact of interest expense from financing, non-cash depreciation and amortization from capital investments, non-cash stock-based compensation, network decommissioning costs and costs related to the Transactions, as they are not indicative of our ongoing operating performance, andas well as certain other nonrecurring income and expenses. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for income from operations, net income or any other measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP.U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).


41

The following table illustrates the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to Net income, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:
Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  $580  20 %$(1,648) (36)%
Adjustments:
Interest expense727  835  1,111  (108) (13)%(276) (25)%
Interest expense to affiliates408  522  560  (114) (22)%(38) (7)%
Interest income(24) (19) (17) (5) 26 %(2) 12 %
Other expense, net 54  73  (46) (85)%(19) (26)%
Income tax expense (benefit)1,135  1,029  (1,375) 106  10 %2,404  (175)%
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  413  %421  %
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  130  %502  %
Stock-based compensation (1)
423  389  307  34  %82  27 %
Merger-related costs620  196  —  424  216 %196  NM  
Other, net (2)
 18  34  (16) (89)%(16) (47)%
Adjusted EBITDA$13,383  $12,398  $11,213  $985  %$1,185  11 %
Net income margin (Net income divided by service revenues)10 %%15 %100 bps-600 bps
Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by service revenues)39 %39 %37 %— bps200 bps
 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
(in millions)2016 2015 2014 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Net income$1,460
 $733
 $247
 $727
 99 % $486
 197%
Adjustments:             
Interest expense1,418
 1,085
 1,073
 333
 31 % 12
 1%
Interest expense to affiliates312
 411
 278
 (99) (24)% 133
 48%
Interest income(261) (420) (359) 159
 (38)% (61) 17%
Other expense, net6
 11
 11
 (5) (45)% 
 %
Income tax expense867
 245
 166
 622
 254 % 79
 48%
Operating income3,802
 2,065
 1,416
 1,737
 84 % 649
 46%
Depreciation and amortization6,243
 4,688
 4,412
 1,555
 33 % 276
 6%
Cost of MetroPCS business combination104
 376
 299
 (272) (72)% 77
 26%
Stock-based compensation (1)
235
 222
 211
 13
 6 % 11
 5%
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses (1)

 
 (720) 
 NM
 720
 NM
Other, net (1)
7
 42
 18
 (35) (83)% 24
 NM
Adjusted EBITDA$10,391
 $7,393
 $5,636
 $2,998
 41 % $1,757
 31%
Net income margin (Net income divided by service revenues)5% 3% 1%   200 bps
   200 bps
Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by service revenues)37% 30% 25%   700 bps
   500 bps
(1)Stock-based compensation includes payroll tax impacts and may not agree to stock-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, certain stock-based compensation expenses associated with the Transactions have been included in Merger-related costs.
NM - Not Meaningful
(1)
Stock-based compensation includes payroll tax impacts and may not agree to stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses may not agree to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income primarily due to certain routine operating activities, such as routine spectrum license exchanges that would be expected to reoccur, and are therefore included in Adjusted EBITDA. (2)Other, net may not agree to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income primarily due to certain non-routine operating activities, such as other special items that would not be expected to reoccur, and are therefore excluded in Adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $3.0 billion, or 41%, in 2016 primarily from:

Increased branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and the ongoing success of our promotional activities;
Higher gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $672 million; gains on disposal were $835 million in 2016 compared to $163 million in 2015;
Lower losses on equipment in 2016 primarily due to an increase in lease revenues resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the second quarter of 2015. Additionally, the costs of leased devices, which are capitalized and depreciated over the lease term, are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. In connection with JUMP! On Demand, we had lease revenues of $1.4 billion in 2016, and depreciation expense of $1.5 billion related to leased wireless devices in 2016; and
Focused cost control and synergies realized from the MetroPCS business combination, primarily in cost of services; partially offset by

Higher selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to strategic investments to support our growing customer base, including higher employee-related costs, higher commissions driven by an increase in branded customer additions and higher promotional costs.

We are making an accounting change in 2017 to include imputed interest associated with EIP receivables in Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, which will primarily due to certain non-routine operating activities, such as other special items that would not be includedexpected to reoccur or are not reflective of T-Mobile’s ongoing operating performance, and are therefore excluded in Adjusted EBITDA. The impact from this accounting change is expected to be approximately $0.2 to $0.3 billion in 2017.


Adjusted EBITDA increased $1.8 billion,$985 million, or 31%8%, in 2015 primarily from:

Increased branded postpaid and prepaid revenues driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and the ongoing success of our promotional activities;
Focused cost control and synergies realized from the MetroPCS business combination, especially in cost of services;
Lower losses on equipment in 2015 primarily due to an increase in leaseto:

Higher service revenues, which are recognized over the lease term, resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand at the endas further discussed above; and
The positive impact of the second quarternew lease standard of 2015. Additionally, the costs of leased devices, which are capitalized and depreciated over the lease term, are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. In connection with JUMP! On Demand, we had lease revenues of $224 million in 2015, and depreciation expense of $312 million related to leased wireless devices in 2015;approximately $195 million; partially offset by
Higher selling,Selling, general and administrative expenses.expenses, excluding Merger-related costs;

Higher Cost of services expenses; and
The impact from hurricane-related reimbursements, net of costs, of $158 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant impacts from hurricanes for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The impact from commission costs capitalized and amortized beginning upon the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, reduced Adjusted EBITDA by $337 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to year ended December 31, 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations, proceeds from issuance of long-term debt capitaland common stock, financing leases, common and preferred stock, the sale of certain receivables, financing arrangements of vendor payables which effectively extend payment terms and ansecured and unsecured revolving credit facilityfacilities with Deutsche Telekom.DT. Upon consummation of the Transactions, we will incur substantial third-party indebtedness which will increase our future financial commitments, including aggregate interest payments on higher total indebtedness, and may adversely impact our liquidity. Further, the incurrence of additional indebtedness may inhibit our ability to incur new debt under the terms governing our existing and future indebtedness, which may make it more difficult for us to incur new debt in the future to finance our business strategy.


42

Cash Flows


The following is an analysisa condensed schedule of our year-to-date cash flows:flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,925  75 %$68  %
Net cash used in investing activities(4,125) (579) (6,745) (3,546) 612 %6,166  (91)%
Net cash used in financing activities(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 962  (29)%(1,969) 144 %
 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
(in millions)2016 2015 2014 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,135
 $5,414
 $4,146
 $721
 13 % $1,268
 31%
Net cash used in investing activities(5,680) (9,560) (7,246) 3,880
 (41)% (2,314) 32%
Net cash provided by financing activities463
 3,413
 2,524
 (2,950) (86)% 889
 35%


Operating Activities


CashNet cash provided by operating activities increased $721 million,$2.9 billion, or 13%75%, in 2016 primarily from:


$727 million increase in Net income;
$1.4A $2.0 billion increase in net non-cash income and expenses included in Net income primarily due to changes in Depreciation and amortization, Deferred income tax expense and Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses; partially offset by
$1.4 billion increasedecrease in net cash outflows from changes in working capital, primarily due to changes inlower use from Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1.9 billion as well as the change in Equipment installment plan receivables, including inflows from the sale of certain EIP receivables, partially offset by the change in Inventories. Net cash used for Accounts payable and accrued liabilities was $1.2 billion in 2016 as compared to net cash provided by Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $693 million in 2015. Net cash proceeds from the sale of EIP and service receivables was $536 million in 2016 as compared to $884 million in 2015.

Cash provided by operating activities increased $1.3 billion, or 31%, in 2015 primarily from:

$486 million increase in Net income;
$1.3 billion increase in net non-cash income and expenses included in Net income primarily due to changes in Depreciation and amortization, Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses and Deferred income tax expense; partially offset by

$509 million increase in net cash outflows from changes in working capital primarily due to changes in Inventories,receivable, Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and Equipment installment plan receivables, including inflowspartially offset by higher use from Inventories; and
A $951 million increase in Net income and net non-cash adjustments to Net income.

With the saleadoption of certain EIP receivables.the new lease standard, changes in Operating lease right-of-use assets and Short and long-term operating lease liabilities are now presented in Changes in operating assets and liabilities. The net impact of changes in these accounts decreased Net cash provided by operating activities by $235 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.


Investing Activities


CashNet cash used in investing activities decreased $3.9increased $3.5 billion, or 41%, in 2016, to a612%. The use of $5.7 billioncash for the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily from:


$4.76.4 billion forin Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest, primarily driven by growth in network build as we continued deployment of $142low band spectrum, including 600 MHz, and launched our nationwide 5G network;
$967 million primarily related to the build out of our 4G LTE network;
$4.0 billion forin Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including a $2.2 billion deposit madedeposits; and
$632 million in Net cash related to a third party in connection with a potential asset purchase;derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements, see Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information; partially offset by
$3.03.9 billion in Sales of short-term investments.

Cash used in investing activities increased $2.3 billion, or 32%, in 2015, to a use of $9.6 billion primarily from:

$4.7 billion for Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $246 million primarilyProceeds related to the build out of our 4G LTE network;beneficial interests in securitization transactions.
$1.9 billion for Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets and
$3.0 billion in Purchases of short-term investments.


Financing Activities


Cash provided byNet cash used in financing activities decreased $3.0$1.0 billion, or 86%, in 2016 to an inflow29%. The use of $463 millioncash for the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily from:


$997 million Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt; partially offset by
$205798 million for Repayments of capitalfinancing lease obligations;
obligations;
$150775 million for Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net; andequipment;
$121600 million for Repayments of long-term debt; and
$156 million for Tax withholdings on share-based awards.
awards.

Activity under the revolving credit facility included borrowing and full repayment of $2.3 billion, for a net of $0 impact.
Cash provided by financing activities increased $889 million, or 35%, in 2015 to inflow of $3.4 billion primarily from:

$4.0 billion Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt; partially offset by
$564 million for Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net.

Cash and Cash Equivalents


As of December 31, 2016,2019, our Cash and cash equivalents were $5.5 billion.$1.5 billion compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2018.


Free Cash Flow


Free Cash Flow represents netNet cash provided by operating activities less payments for purchasesPurchases of property and equipment.equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash
43

payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs. Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management, investors and analysts of T-Mobile’sour financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.


The followingIn 2019, we sold tower sites for proceeds of $38 million which are included in Proceeds from sales of tower sites within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As these proceeds were from the sale of fixed assets and are used by management to assess cash available for capital expenditures during the year, we determined the proceeds are relevant for the calculation of Free Cash Flow and included them in the table below. Other proceeds from the sale of fixed assets for the periods presented are not significant. We have presented the impact of the sales in the table below, which illustrates the calculation of Free Cash Flow and reconciles Free Cash Flow to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:measure.

Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Net cash provided by operating activitiesNet cash provided by operating activities$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,925  75 %$68  %
Cash purchases of property and equipmentCash purchases of property and equipment(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) (850) 15 %(304) %
Proceeds from sales of tower sitesProceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  38  NM  —  NM  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactionsProceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  (1,530) (28)%1,087  25 %
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costsCash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 184  (87)%(24) 13 %
Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow$4,319  $3,552  $2,725  $767  22 %$827  30 %
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Versus 2015 2015 Versus 2014
(in millions)2016 2015 2014 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,135
 $5,414
 $4,146
 $721
 13 % $1,268
 31 %
Cash purchases of property and equipment(4,702) (4,724) (4,317) 22
  % (407) 9 %
Free Cash Flow$1,433
 $690
 $(171) $743
 108 % $861
 (504)%



Free Cash Flow increased $743$767 million, in 2016 and increased $861 million for 2015or 22%, primarily from:


Higher netNet cash provided by operating activities, as described above; and
Lower purchases of propertyCash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; partially offset by
Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; and equipment from the build-out of our 4G LTE network in 2016, as described above. In 2015, purchases of property and equipment were higher compared to 2014 from the build-out of our 4G LTE network, as described above.
Higher Cash purchases of property and equipment, includesincluding capitalized interest of $142 million, $246$473 million and $64$362 million for 2016, 2015the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2014,2018, respectively.

Free Cash Flow includes $442 million and $86 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Debt

Borrowing Capacity and Debt Financing

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our total debt was $27.8and financing lease liabilities were $27.3 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $27.4$24.9 billion was classified as long-term debt. Significant debt-related activity during 2016 included:


In March 2016, T-Mobile USA,Effective April 28, 2019, we redeemed $600 million aggregate principal amount of our DT Senior Reset Notes. The notes were redeemed at a subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc., and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”), our majority stockholder, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sellredemption price equal to Deutsche Telekom $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “5.300% Senior Notes”) for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 billion. As amended in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 5.300% Senior Notes on or prior to May 5, 2017, the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche Telekom for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration104.666% of the extended commitments.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA issued $1.0 billion of public 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to $1.35 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 and (iii) entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to an additional $650 million of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.

The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $1.35 billion purchase agreement will be approximately 103.316% of the outstanding principal balanceamount of the notes issued. As amended(plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon) and were paid on April 29, 2019. The redemption premium was $28 million and was included in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 6.000% Senior Notes under the $1.35 billion purchase agreement onOther expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and in Cash payments for debt prepayment or prior to May 5, 2017 or elects to issue less than $1.35 billiondebt extinguishment costs in our Consolidated Statements of 6.000% Senior Notes, any unused portionCash Flows.

Certain components of the commitment underreset features were required to be bifurcated from the purchase agreement terminatesDT Senior Reset Notes and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekomwere separately accounted for as embedded derivatives. The write-off of embedded derivatives upon redemption resulted in a gain of $11 million, which was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) relatedNotes to the transaction. In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche TelekomConsolidated Financial Statements for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration of the extended commitments.further information.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, in which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to an additional $650 million of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.  The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $650 million purchase agreement will be approximately 104.047% of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. As amended in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 6.000% Senior Notes under the $650 million purchase agreement on or prior to May 5, 2017 or elects to issue less than $650 million Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction.  In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche Telekom for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration of the extended commitments.


We have entered into uncommitted capital lease facilities with certain partners, which provide us with the ability to enter into capital leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2016, we have committed to $1.3 billion of capital leases under these capital lease facilities, of which $799 million was executed during the year ended December 31, 2016. We expect to enter into up to an additional $900 million in capital lease commitments during 2017.

In December 2016, we terminated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom. In addition, T-Mobile USA entered intomaintain a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche TelekomDT which is comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion senior

secured revolving credit agreement. In December 2019, we amended the terms of the revolving credit facility with DT to extend the maturity date to December 29, 2022. As of December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.


In January 2017, T-Mobile USA borrowed $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”) with Deutsche Telekom to refinance $1.98 billion of outstanding secured term loans under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt. The loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches on January 31, 2017 (i) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and will mature on November 9, 2022 and (ii) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% and will mature on January 31, 2024. The Incremental Term Loan Facility increases Deutsche Telekom’s incremental term loan commitment provided to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016 from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provides to T-Mobile USA an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment. See Note 14 – Subsequent Events
We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding balances.

44

We maintain vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we utilized $800 million and repaid $775 million under the vendor financing arrangements. Invoices subject to extended payment terms have various due dates through the first quarter of 2020. Payments on vendor financing agreements are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2019, there were $25 million in outstanding borrowings under the vendor financing agreements which were included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, there was no outstanding balance.

Consents on Debt

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018, we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain of our existing debt and certain existing debt of our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a financing matters agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to the incurrence by
T-Mobile USA of secured debt in connection with and after the consummation of the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Commitment Letter

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we expect to incur certain fees payable to the financial institutions, including certain financing fees on the secured term loan commitment. If the Merger closes, we will incur additional details.fees for the financial institutions structuring and providing the commitments and certain take-out fees associated with the issuance of permanent secured bond debt in lieu of the secured bridge loan. In total, we may incur up to approximately $340 million in fees associated with the Commitment Letter. We began incurring certain Commitment Letter fees on November 1, 2019, which were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There were $12 million of fees accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity

We couldmay seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2017,2020, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions and future FCC spectrum license auctions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months.months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt.debt and stock purchases.


In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In November 2019, we extended the mandatory termination date on our interest rate lock derivatives to June 3, 2020. In December 2019, we made net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaling $632 million, which included variation margin transfers to (or from) such derivative counterparties based on daily market movements. These collateral transfers are included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheetsand inNet cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The interest rate lock derivatives will be settled upon the earlier of the issuance of fixed-rate debt or the current mandatory termination date. Upon settlement of the interest rate lock derivatives, we will receive, or make, a cash payment in the amount of the fair value of the cash flow hedge as of the settlement date. We expect our existing sources of liquidity to be sufficient to meet the requirements of the interest rate lock derivatives.
45

We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment.


The indentures and credit facilities governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to:to incur more debt;debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock;stock, make certain investments;investments, repurchase stock;stock, create liens or other encumbrances;encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates;affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries;subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to the Parent. However, the Issuer is allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2016.2019.


Financing Lease Facilities

We have entered into uncommitted financing lease facilities with certain partners, which provide us with the ability to enter into financing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2019, we have committed to $3.9 billion of financing leases under these financing lease facilities, of which $898 million was executed during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Capital Expenditures


Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses and the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to our network transformation, including the build outbuild-out of 700our network to utilize our 600 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses.licenses and the deployment of 5G. We expect cash capital expenditures forpurchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of approximately $400 million, to be in the range$5.9 to $6.2 billion and cash purchases of $4.8 billionproperty and equipment, excluding capitalized interest, to $5.1be $5.5 to $5.8 billion in 2017, excluding capitalized interest.2020. This includes expenditures for 600 MHz and 5G deployment. This does not include property and equipment obtained through capitalfinancing lease agreements, vendor financing agreements, leased wireless devices transferred from inventory or any additional purchases of spectrum licenses. Similar

Share Repurchases

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to 2016, cash capital expenditures will be front-end loaded$1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program was completed on April 29, 2018.

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in 2017 duethe total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our common stock through the year ending December 31, 2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the Transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no repurchases of our common stock under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018. See Note 12 - Repurchases of Common Stock of the Notes to the completion of the 700 MHz A-Block build-out.Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


In particular,Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we are participatingdo not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the FCC broadcast incentive auctionforeseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
46

Table of low-band 600 MHz spectrum licenses that is currently in-progress. If we win spectrum in the auction, we may incur substantial additional expenditures for the purchase price and to gain access to such spectrum. Any such amounts would be funded primarily through cash on hand and borrowings. As a result, our level of debt could increase.Contents


Contractual Obligations


The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 20162019 and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
(in millions)Less Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years4 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 YearsTotal
Long-term debt (1)
$—  $5,500  $7,300  $12,200  $25,000  
Interest on long-term debt1,282  2,365  1,796  1,163  6,606  
Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest1,013  1,147  172  115  2,447  
Tower obligations (2)
160  321  320  467  1,268  
Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest2,754  4,894  3,523  3,797  14,968  
Purchase obligations (3)
3,603  3,263  1,597  1,387  9,850  
Total contractual obligations$8,812  $17,490  $14,708  $19,129  $60,139  
(in millions)Less Than 1 Year 1 - 3 Years 4 - 5 Years More Than 5 Years Total
Long-term debt (1)
$20
 $3,040
 $7,790
 $15,330
 $26,180
Interest on long-term debt1,679
 3,270
 2,568
 1,925
 9,442
Capital lease obligations, including interest390
 669
 350
 214
 1,623
Tower obligations (2)
184
 368
 370
 1,164
 2,086
Operating leases (3)
2,417
 3,950
 2,613
 2,188
 11,168
Purchase obligations (4)
2,011
 1,818
 1,330
 960
 6,119
Network decommissioning (5)
112
 176
 83
 48
 419
Total contractual obligations$6,813
 $13,291
 $15,104
 $21,829
 $57,037
(1)
Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, capital lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements. See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)
Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(3)
As of December 31, 2016, we have updated the future minimum lease payments for all cell site leases presented above to include only payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only as they represent the payments which we cannot avoid at our option and also corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases. This update had the effect of reducing our operating lease commitments included in the table above by $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2016. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(4)
T-Mobile calculated the minimum obligation for certain agreements to purchase goods or services based on termination fees that can be paid to exit the contract. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due in less than one year, as this is the earliest T-Mobile could exit these contracts. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2016 under normal business purposes. See Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
(5)Represents future undiscounted cash flows related to decommissioned MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant cell sites as of December 31, 2016.

(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, financing lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements. See Note 8 – Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2019 under normal business purposes. See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities excluding network decommissioning, have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absence of historical trending to be used as a predictor of such payments. In addition, because dividends on preferred stock are subject to approval by our Board of Directors, amounts are not included in the preceding table unless such authorization has occurred and the dividend has not been paid. See Note 1317 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.


The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase handsets and accessories,lease spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, programmingmarketing sponsorship agreements and network services, and marketing activities, which will be used or soldother items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent T-Mobile’sour entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which T-Mobile iswe are contractually committed. Where T-Mobile iswe are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether it takeswe take delivery, T-Mobile haswe have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. Additionally, included within purchase obligations are amounts for theThe acquisition of spectrum licenses which areis subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.


In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Balances related to the cash flow hedges have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the amount and timing of settlements. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Related Party Transactions

We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing. See Note 17 - Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.

47

As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2019, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with DT. We have relied upon DT for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.

DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: MTN Irancell, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2019, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.

In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


In 2015, we entered into an arrangement,We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis through November 2017 as an additional source of liquidity. In June 2016, the arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to $1.3 billion with a scheduled expiration date in November 2017. In 2014, we entered into an arrangement, as amended, to sell certainand service accounts receivable on a revolving basis through March 2017 as an additionala source of liquidity. In November 2016, the arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to $950 million with a scheduled expiration date in March 2018. As of December 31, 2016, T-Mobile2019, we derecognized net receivables of $2.5$2.6 billion upon sale through these arrangements. See Note 34 – Sales of Certain Receivablesof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Related-Party Transactions

In March 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 billion.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to $1.35 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024. The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $1.35 billion purchase agreement will be approximately 103.316% of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to $650 million of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024. The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $650 million purchase agreement will be approximately 104.047% of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.

The purchase agreements were amended in October 2016, see Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2016, we terminated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom. In addition, T-Mobile USA entered into a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion senior secured revolving credit agreement. As of December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

In January 2017, T-Mobile USA borrowed $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”) with Deutsche Telekom to refinance $1.98 billion of outstanding secured term loans under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt. The loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches on January 31, 2017 (i) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and will mature on November 9, 2022 and (ii) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% and will mature on January 31, 2024. The Incremental Term Loan Facility increases Deutsche Telekom’s incremental term loan commitment provided to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016 from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provides to T-Mobile USA an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment. See Note 14 – Subsequent Events of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


We also have related party transactions associated with Deutsche Telekom or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing. See Note 13 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).  Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.  Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.

As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates in 2016 that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with Deutsche Telekom. We have relied upon Deutsche Telekom for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.

Deutsche Telekom, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Gostaresh Ertebatat Taliya, Irancell Telecommunications Services Company (“MTN Irancell”), Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In

2016, gross revenues of all Deutsche Telekom affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic with Iran were less than $1.0 million and estimated net profits were less than $1.0 million.

In addition, Deutsche Telekom, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, operating a fixed line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities in 2016 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that Deutsche Telekom intends to continue these activities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition and results as they require thethat we use of estimates and assumptions whichthat may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial statements and accompanying notes.results. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.


TheseEight of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates are inherently subject to judgmentuncertain and actualbecause it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.

Leases

We adopted the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 and recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded.

Significant Judgments:

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights. Identification of a lease may require significant judgment.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent will no longer be presented separately.

48

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to new leases in determining the expected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

49

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 15 - Leases of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Revenue Recognition

We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances,” below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances”, below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.

50

Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 - Revenue From Contracts with Customers of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Allowances


We maintain an allowance for estimatedcredit losses, which is management’s estimate of such losses inherent in theour receivables portfolio, comprised of accounts receivable and EIP receivable portfolios. When determiningsegments. Changes in the allowance we considerfor credit losses and, therefore, in related provision for credit losses (“bad debt expense”) can materially affect earnings. Credit risk characteristics are assessed for each receivable segment. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the allowance for credit losses, management considers a number of factors, including receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and current collection trends, aging of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factorsconditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions.

Credit collection risks are assessed for each type of receivable, such as EIP receivables, based upon historical and expected write-offs, net of recoveries, and an analysis While our methodology attributes portions of the aged receivable balances with reserves generally increasing asallowance to specific portfolio segments, the receivable ages. entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Management also considers an amount that represents management’s judgment of risks inherent in the process and assumptions used in establishing the allowance for credit losses, including process risk and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.

To the extent that actual loss experience differs significantly from historical trends or assumptions, the requiredappropriate allowance amountslevels for realized credit losses could differ from the estimate. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.


We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments over a period of up to 2436 months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. Receivables held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables and record thereceivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the present valuerecorded amount of the EIP receivables and their faceunpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement and recorded as a direct reduction to the carrying value with a corresponding reduction to equipment revenues.in transaction price. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the amount of expectedestimated credit lossesrisk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate valuationcredit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Interest incomeOther revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income.


Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivablesreceivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.


Total imputed discountDeferred Purchase Price Assets

In connection with the sales of certain service and allowances asEIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates and credit worthiness, dilutions and recoveries. See Note 4 – Sales of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was approximately 8.0% and 8.2%, respectively,Certain Receivables of the total amountNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

51

Table of gross accounts receivable, including EIP receivables.Contents

Depreciation


Depreciation commences once assets have been placed in service. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to T-Mobile,us, which is generally shorter than the lease term.term and considers expected losses. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property, plant and equipment. These studies take into accountconsider actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution and expected loss of leased wireless devices.evolution. When these factors indicate that an asset’sthe useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book values are depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining

estimated useful life. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 45 – Property and Equipment of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding depreciation of assets, including management’s underlying estimates of useful lives.


Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment


We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate thatsuch assets might be impaired.


We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether itif the quantitative impairment test is more likely than not the fair value of the single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the singlea reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill is tested for impairment based onallocated to that reporting unit.

We employed a two-step test. Inqualitative approach to assess the first step, we compare thewireless reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The fair value of thewireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying aggregate fair value.


InWe employed a quantitative approach to assess the second step, we determine the fair values of all of the assets and liabilities of theLayer3 reporting unit, including those that currently may not be recorded.unit. The excess of the fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit overis determined using an income approach, which is based on estimated discounted future cash flows.

We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the sumreporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:

Expected cash flows underlying the Layer3 business plan for the periods 2020 through 2024, which took into account estimates of subscribers for TVision services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures.
Cash flows beyond 2024 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain.
We used a discount rate of 32% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.

The estimated fair value of allthe Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 3% as of those assets and liabilities representsDecember 31, 2019. Delays in the impliednational launch of TVision services or cash flows that do not meet our projections could result in a goodwill amount. Ifimpairment of Layer3 in the implied fairfuture. The carrying value of the goodwill is lower thanassociated with the carrying amountLayer3 reporting unit was $218 million as of goodwill, then an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.December 31, 2019.


52

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with theour management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset group is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset group is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset group.asset. If the carrying amount of spectrum licenses exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.  We estimate theestimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield approach,methodology, which is an income approach, that estimatesto estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield approachmethodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses). The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield approachmethodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield approachmethodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.


The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues, EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and the long-term growth rate. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant AccountingPolicies and Note 56 – Goodwill, Spectrum LicensesLicense Transactions and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding our annual impairment test and impairment charges.


Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.

We are exposed to changes in interest rates on our Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, our majority stockholder. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in the fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for 30-day LIBOR rates of positive 150 and negative 50 basis points. In cases where the debt is redeemable and the fair value calculation results in a liability greater than the cost to replace the debt, the maximum liability is assumed to
53

be no greater than the current cost to redeem the debt. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our Incremental Term Loan Facility, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:

Carrying AmountFair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+150 Basis Point Shift-50 Basis Point Shift
LIBOR plus 1.50% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022$2,000  $2,000  $1,966  $2,000  
LIBOR plus 1.75% Senior Secured Term Loan due 20242,000  2,000  1,956  2,000  

We are exposed to changes in the benchmark interest rate associated with our interest rate lock derivatives. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for eight and 10-year LIBOR swap rates of positive 200 and negative 100 basis points. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our interest rate lock derivatives, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:
Fair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+200 Basis Point Shift-100 Basis Point Shift
Interest rate lock derivatives$(1,170) $410  $(2,077) 





































54

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Changes in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues in 2018.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
55

company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Adoption of Leases Standard

As described in Notes 1 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the new accounting standard on Leases, on January 1, 2019, by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. As a result, among other adjustments, the Company recognized operating lease right-of-use assets of $9,251 million and operating lease liabilities of $11,364 million on the balance sheet on the date of adoption. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying amounts of operating and finance lease right-of-use assets were $10,933 million and $2,715 million respectively and operating and finance lease liabilities were $12,826 million and $2,303 million respectively. The Company recorded $3,406 million of lease expense during the year. Management also reassessed the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites to determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. This reassessment resulted in (i) assets relating to 6,200 tower sites transferred pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement continuing to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks; (ii) a sale being recognized for 1,400 tower sites sold that were not associated with the master prepaid lease. Upon adoption, the Company derecognized its existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the adoption of the lease standard is a critical audit matter are (i) there was significant judgment by management in applying the lease standard to a large volume of leases in the company’s lease portfolio; (ii) implementation of new lease accounting systems resulted in material changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) significant judgment in the application of the standard relating to sale-leaseback accounting. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the implementation of new lease accounting systems and management’s significant judgments, including the assessment of the previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites. The audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from the procedures.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the adoption of the new standard on the Company’s various lease portfolios, including those associated with previously failed sale-leaseback transactions and testing of controls over the implementation and functionality of the new lease accounting systems. The procedures also included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of management’s identification of the leases in the Company’s lease portfolios and evaluating the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management to identify contractual terms in lease arrangements that impact the determination of the right-of-use asset and lease liability amount recognized. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist with the evaluation of previous failed sales-leaseback tower sites.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 6, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.



56

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions, except share and per share amounts)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,528  $1,203  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $61 and $671,888  1,769  
Equipment installment plan receivables, net2,600  2,538  
Accounts receivable from affiliates20  11  
Inventory964  1,084  
Other current assets2,305  1,676  
Total current assets9,305  8,281  
Property and equipment, net21,984  23,359  
Operating lease right-of-use assets10,933  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets2,715  —  
Goodwill1,930  1,901  
Spectrum licenses36,465  35,559  
Other intangible assets, net115  198  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
Other assets1,891  1,623  
Total assets$86,921  $72,468  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$6,746  $7,741  
Payables to affiliates187  200  
Short-term debt25  841  
Deferred revenue631  698  
Short-term operating lease liabilities2,287  —  
Short-term financing lease liabilities957  —  
Other current liabilities1,673  787  
Total current liabilities12,506  10,267  
Long-term debt10,958  12,124  
Long-term debt to affiliates13,986  14,582  
Tower obligations2,236  2,557  
Deferred tax liabilities5,607  4,472  
Operating lease liabilities10,539  —  
Financing lease liabilities1,346  —  
Deferred rent expense—  2,781  
Other long-term liabilities954  967  
Total long-term liabilities45,626  37,483  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders' equity
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 858,418,615 and 851,675,119 shares issued, 856,905,400 and 850,180,317 shares outstanding—  —  
Additional paid-in capital38,498  38,010  
Treasury stock, at cost,1,513,215 and 1,494,802 shares issued(8) (6) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(868) (332) 
Accumulated deficit(8,833) (12,954) 
Total stockholders' equity28,789  24,718  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$86,921  $72,468  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
57

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)201920182017
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  
Branded prepaid revenues9,543  9,598  9,380  
Wholesale revenues1,279  1,183  1,102  
Roaming and other service revenues499  349  230  
Total service revenues33,994  31,992  30,160  
Equipment revenues9,840  10,009  9,375  
Other revenues1,164  1,309  1,069  
Total revenues44,998  43,310  40,604  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below6,622  6,307  6,100  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below11,899  12,047  11,608  
Selling, general and administrative14,139  13,161  12,259  
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Total operating expenses39,276  38,001  35,716  
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense(727) (835) (1,111) 
Interest expense to affiliates(408) (522) (560) 
Interest income24  19  17  
Other expense, net(8) (54) (73) 
Total other expense, net(1,119) (1,392) (1,727) 
Income before income taxes4,603  3,917  3,161  
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,135) (1,029) 1,375  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,481  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $0, $0, and $2—  —   
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax effect of $(187), $(115), and $0(536) (332) —  
Other comprehensive (loss) income(536) (332)  
Total comprehensive income$2,932  $2,556  $4,543  
Earnings per share
Basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
58

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Operating activities
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Stock-based compensation expense495  424  306  
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1,091  980  (1,404) 
Bad debt expense307  297  388  
Losses from sales of receivables130  157  299  
Deferred rent expense—  26  76  
Losses on redemption of debt19  122  86  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable(3,709) (4,617) (3,931) 
Equipment installment plan receivables(1,015) (1,598) (1,812) 
Inventories(617) (201) (844) 
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,896  —  —  
Other current and long-term assets(144) (181) (575) 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities17  (867) 1,079  
Short and long-term operating lease liabilities(2,131) —  —  
Other current and long-term liabilities144  (69) (233) 
Other, net257  52  111  
Net cash provided by operating activities6,824  3,899  3,831  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $473, $362 and $136(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(967) (127) (5,828) 
Proceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  
Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements(632) —  —  
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired(31) (338) —  
Other, net(18) 21   
Net cash used in investing activities(4,125) (579) (6,745) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt—  2,494  10,480  
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility2,340  6,265  2,910  
Repayments of revolving credit facility(2,340) (6,265) (2,910) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations(798) (700) (486) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net(775) (300) (300) 
Repayments of long-term debt(600) (3,349) (10,230) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (1,071) (427) 
Tax withholdings on share-based awards(156) (146) (166) 
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 
Other, net(17) (52)  
Net cash used in financing activities(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents325  (16) (4,281) 
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period1,203  1,219  5,500  
End of period$1,528  $1,203  $1,219  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized$1,128  $1,525  $2,028  
Operating lease payments (1)
2,783  —  —  
Income tax payments88  51  31  
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Non-cash beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized receivables$6,509  $4,972  $4,063  
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment(935) 65  313  
Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment1,006  1,011  1,131  
Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory(267) (326) (742) 
Short-term debt assumed for financing of property and equipment800  291  292  
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations3,621  —  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations1,041  885  887  
(1)On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires certain supplemental cash flow disclosures. Where these disclosures or a comparable figure were not required under the former lease standard, we have not retrospectively presented historical amounts. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional details.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
59

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(in millions, except shares)Preferred Stock OutstandingCommon Stock OutstandingTreasury Shares at CostPar Value and Additional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAccumulated DeficitTotal Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of December 31, 201620,000,000  826,357,331  $(1) $38,846  $ $(20,610) $18,236  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  4,536  4,536  
Other comprehensive income—  —  —  —   —   
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  344  —  —  344  
Exercise of stock options—  450,493  —  19  —  —  19  
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  1,832,043  —  82  —  —  82  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  8,338,271  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,754,721) —  (166) —  —  (166) 
Mandatory conversion of preferred shares to common shares(20,000,000) 32,237,983  —  —  —  —  —  
Repurchases of common stock—  (7,010,889) —  (444) —  —  (444) 
Transfer RSU to NQDC plan—  (43,860) (3)  —  —  —  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  —  (55) —  —  (55) 
Balance as of December 31, 2017—  859,406,651  (4) 38,629   (16,074) 22,559  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  2,888  2,888  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (332) —  (332) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  473  —  —  473  
Exercise of stock options—  187,965  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,011,794  —  103  —  —  103  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  7,448,148  —  —  —  —  —  
Issuance of restricted stock awards—  225,799  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,321,827) —  (146) —  —  (146) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (16,738,758) —  (1,054) —  —  (1,054) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (39,455) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  (8) 232  224  
Balance as of December 31, 2018—  850,180,317  (6) 38,010  (332) (12,954) 24,718  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  3,468  3,468  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (536) —  (536) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  517  —  —  517  
Exercise of stock options—  85,083  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,091,650  —  124  —  —  124  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  6,685,950  —  —  —  —  —  
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards—  (24,682) —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,094,555) —  (156) —  —  (156) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (18,363) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  —  653  653  
Balance as of December 31, 2019—  856,905,400  $(8) $38,498  $(868) $(8,833) $28,789  
(1)Prior year Retained Earnings represents the impact of the adoption of new accounting standards on beginning Accumulated Deficit and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

60

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


61

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro™ by T-Mobile ("Metro by T-Mobile"), in the United States (“U.S.”), Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. All of our revenues were earned in, and all of our long-lived assets are located in, the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We provide mobile communications services primarily using our 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network and our newly deployed 5G technology network. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tablets and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”) and leasing through JUMP! On Demand™. Additionally, we provide reinsurance for handset insurance policies and extended warranty contracts offered to our mobile communications customers.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the balances and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We operate as a single operating segment.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. See “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year” below.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase.

Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts currently due from customers, other carriers and third-party retail channels. Accounts receivable not held for sale are reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for credit losses. Accounts receivable held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. We have an arrangement to sell the majority of service accounts receivable on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.

We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and certain other purchases in installments typically over a period of 24, but up to 36, months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the recorded amount of the EIP receivables and their unpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations in the arrangement and recorded as a reduction in transaction price in Total service revenues and Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate credit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is
62

amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

Total imputed discount and allowances were approximately 7.0% and 8.1% of the total amount of gross accounts receivable, including EIP receivables, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The current portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables, net and the long-term portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have an arrangement to sell certain EIP receivables on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses and determine its appropriateness through an established process that assesses the losses inherent in our receivables portfolio. We develop and document our allowance methodology at the portfolio segment level - accounts receivable portfolio and EIP receivable portfolio segments. While we attribute portions of the allowance to our respective accounts receivable and EIP portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Our process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique risk characteristics of our accounts receivable and EIP receivable portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, losses are estimated collectively for groups of receivables with similar characteristics. Our allowance levels are influenced by receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of wireless devices and accessories, which are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using standard cost which approximates average cost. Shipping and handling costs paid to wireless device and accessories vendors, and costs to refurbish used devices recovered through our device upgrade programs are included in the standard cost of inventory. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We record inventory write-downs to net realizable value for obsolete and slow-moving items based on inventory turnover trends and historical experience.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. All of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communications systems include assets to operate our wireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the retirement of long-lived assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into account actual usage, physical wear
63

and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.

JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to 1 time per month. To date, all of our leased devices were classified as operating leases. At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from inventory to property and equipment. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of incentives, are generally recognized over the lease term. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value with any write-down recognized asCost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Costs of major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures which do not enhance or extend the asset’s useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Construction costs, labor and overhead incurred in the expansion or enhancement of our wireless network are capitalized. Capitalization commences with pre-construction period administrative and technical activities, which includes obtaining leases, zoning approvals and building permits, and ceases at the point at which the asset is ready for its intended use. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. Capitalized interest is reported as a reduction in interest expense and depreciated over the useful life of the related assets.

We record an asset retirement obligation for the fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.

We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.

Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists are amortized using the sum-of-the-years'-digits method over the expected period in which the relationship is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The remaining finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.

Spectrum Licenses

Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.

64

At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment and transferred at their carrying value, net of any impairment, to assets held for sale included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valued at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the spectrum licenses obtained, book value of the spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain and included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the book value of the assets transferred or exchanged.

Impairment

We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

Guarantee LiabilitiesConsolidated Balance Sheets


In 2013,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,528  $1,203  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $61 and $671,888  1,769  
Equipment installment plan receivables, net2,600  2,538  
Accounts receivable from affiliates20  11  
Inventory964  1,084  
Other current assets2,305  1,676  
Total current assets9,305  8,281  
Property and equipment, net21,984  23,359  
Operating lease right-of-use assets10,933  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets2,715  —  
Goodwill1,930  1,901  
Spectrum licenses36,465  35,559  
Other intangible assets, net115  198  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
Other assets1,891  1,623  
Total assets$86,921  $72,468  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$6,746  $7,741  
Payables to affiliates187  200  
Short-term debt25  841  
Deferred revenue631  698  
Short-term operating lease liabilities2,287  —  
Short-term financing lease liabilities957  —  
Other current liabilities1,673  787  
Total current liabilities12,506  10,267  
Long-term debt10,958  12,124  
Long-term debt to affiliates13,986  14,582  
Tower obligations2,236  2,557  
Deferred tax liabilities5,607  4,472  
Operating lease liabilities10,539  —  
Financing lease liabilities1,346  —  
Deferred rent expense—  2,781  
Other long-term liabilities954  967  
Total long-term liabilities45,626  37,483  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders' equity
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 858,418,615 and 851,675,119 shares issued, 856,905,400 and 850,180,317 shares outstanding—  —  
Additional paid-in capital38,498  38,010  
Treasury stock, at cost,1,513,215 and 1,494,802 shares issued(8) (6) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(868) (332) 
Accumulated deficit(8,833) (12,954) 
Total stockholders' equity28,789  24,718  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$86,921  $72,468  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
57

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)201920182017
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  
Branded prepaid revenues9,543  9,598  9,380  
Wholesale revenues1,279  1,183  1,102  
Roaming and other service revenues499  349  230  
Total service revenues33,994  31,992  30,160  
Equipment revenues9,840  10,009  9,375  
Other revenues1,164  1,309  1,069  
Total revenues44,998  43,310  40,604  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below6,622  6,307  6,100  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below11,899  12,047  11,608  
Selling, general and administrative14,139  13,161  12,259  
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Total operating expenses39,276  38,001  35,716  
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense(727) (835) (1,111) 
Interest expense to affiliates(408) (522) (560) 
Interest income24  19  17  
Other expense, net(8) (54) (73) 
Total other expense, net(1,119) (1,392) (1,727) 
Income before income taxes4,603  3,917  3,161  
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,135) (1,029) 1,375  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,481  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $0, $0, and $2—  —   
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax effect of $(187), $(115), and $0(536) (332) —  
Other comprehensive (loss) income(536) (332)  
Total comprehensive income$2,932  $2,556  $4,543  
Earnings per share
Basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
58

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Operating activities
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Stock-based compensation expense495  424  306  
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1,091  980  (1,404) 
Bad debt expense307  297  388  
Losses from sales of receivables130  157  299  
Deferred rent expense—  26  76  
Losses on redemption of debt19  122  86  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable(3,709) (4,617) (3,931) 
Equipment installment plan receivables(1,015) (1,598) (1,812) 
Inventories(617) (201) (844) 
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,896  —  —  
Other current and long-term assets(144) (181) (575) 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities17  (867) 1,079  
Short and long-term operating lease liabilities(2,131) —  —  
Other current and long-term liabilities144  (69) (233) 
Other, net257  52  111  
Net cash provided by operating activities6,824  3,899  3,831  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $473, $362 and $136(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(967) (127) (5,828) 
Proceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  
Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements(632) —  —  
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired(31) (338) —  
Other, net(18) 21   
Net cash used in investing activities(4,125) (579) (6,745) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt—  2,494  10,480  
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility2,340  6,265  2,910  
Repayments of revolving credit facility(2,340) (6,265) (2,910) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations(798) (700) (486) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net(775) (300) (300) 
Repayments of long-term debt(600) (3,349) (10,230) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (1,071) (427) 
Tax withholdings on share-based awards(156) (146) (166) 
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 
Other, net(17) (52)  
Net cash used in financing activities(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents325  (16) (4,281) 
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period1,203  1,219  5,500  
End of period$1,528  $1,203  $1,219  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized$1,128  $1,525  $2,028  
Operating lease payments (1)
2,783  —  —  
Income tax payments88  51  31  
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Non-cash beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized receivables$6,509  $4,972  $4,063  
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment(935) 65  313  
Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment1,006  1,011  1,131  
Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory(267) (326) (742) 
Short-term debt assumed for financing of property and equipment800  291  292  
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations3,621  —  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations1,041  885  887  
(1)On January 1, 2019, we introducedadopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires certain supplemental cash flow disclosures. Where these disclosures or a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phonecomparable figure were not required under the former lease standard, we have not retrospectively presented historical amounts. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional details.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
59

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(in millions, except shares)Preferred Stock OutstandingCommon Stock OutstandingTreasury Shares at CostPar Value and Additional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAccumulated DeficitTotal Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of December 31, 201620,000,000  826,357,331  $(1) $38,846  $ $(20,610) $18,236  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  4,536  4,536  
Other comprehensive income—  —  —  —   —   
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  344  —  —  344  
Exercise of stock options—  450,493  —  19  —  —  19  
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  1,832,043  —  82  —  —  82  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  8,338,271  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,754,721) —  (166) —  —  (166) 
Mandatory conversion of preferred shares to common shares(20,000,000) 32,237,983  —  —  —  —  —  
Repurchases of common stock—  (7,010,889) —  (444) —  —  (444) 
Transfer RSU to NQDC plan—  (43,860) (3)  —  —  —  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  —  (55) —  —  (55) 
Balance as of December 31, 2017—  859,406,651  (4) 38,629   (16,074) 22,559  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  2,888  2,888  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (332) —  (332) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  473  —  —  473  
Exercise of stock options—  187,965  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,011,794  —  103  —  —  103  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  7,448,148  —  —  —  —  —  
Issuance of restricted stock awards—  225,799  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,321,827) —  (146) —  —  (146) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (16,738,758) —  (1,054) —  —  (1,054) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (39,455) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  (8) 232  224  
Balance as of December 31, 2018—  850,180,317  (6) 38,010  (332) (12,954) 24,718  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  3,468  3,468  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (536) —  (536) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  517  —  —  517  
Exercise of stock options—  85,083  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,091,650  —  124  —  —  124  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  6,685,950  —  —  —  —  —  
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards—  (24,682) —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,094,555) —  (156) —  —  (156) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (18,363) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  —  653  653  
Balance as of December 31, 2019—  856,905,400  $(8) $38,498  $(868) $(8,833) $28,789  
(1)Prior year Retained Earnings represents the impact of the adoption of new accounting standards on beginning Accumulated Deficit and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

60

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


61

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

T-Mobile US, Inc. (“JUMP!T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro™ by T-Mobile ("Metro by T-Mobile"), in the United States (“U.S.”), Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. All of our revenues were earned in, and all of our long-lived assets are located in, the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We provide mobile communications services primarily using our 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network and our newly deployed 5G technology network. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tablets and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”) and leasing through JUMP! On Demand™. Additionally, we provide reinsurance for handset insurance policies and extended warranty contracts offered to our mobile communications customers.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the balances and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in rightwe exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to upgrade their device. Participating customers must financebe the purchase of a device on an EIPprimary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treatedbeen eliminated in consolidation. We operate as a single multiple-elementoperating segment.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. See “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year” below.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase.

Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts currently due from customers, other carriers and third-party retail channels. Accounts receivable not held for sale are reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for credit losses. Accounts receivable held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. We have an arrangement to sell the majority of service accounts receivable on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.

We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and certain other purchases in installments typically over a period of 24, but up to 36, months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the recorded amount of the EIP receivables and their unpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations in the arrangement and recorded as a reduction in transaction price in Total service revenues and Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate credit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is
62

amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

Total imputed discount and allowances were approximately 7.0% and 8.1% of the total amount of gross accounts receivable, including EIP receivables, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The current portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables, net and the long-term portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have an arrangement to sell certain EIP receivables on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses and determine its appropriateness through an established process that assesses the losses inherent in our receivables portfolio. We develop and document our allowance methodology at the portfolio segment level - accounts receivable portfolio and EIP receivable portfolio segments. While we attribute portions of the allowance to our respective accounts receivable and EIP portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Our process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique risk characteristics of our accounts receivable and EIP receivable portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, losses are estimated collectively for groups of receivables with similar characteristics. Our allowance levels are influenced by receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of wireless devices and accessories, which are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using standard cost which approximates average cost. Shipping and handling costs paid to wireless device and accessories vendors, and costs to refurbish used devices recovered through our device upgrade programs are included in the standard cost of inventory. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We record inventory write-downs to net realizable value for obsolete and slow-moving items based on inventory turnover trends and historical experience.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. All of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when enteredevents or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communications systems include assets to operate our wireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the retirement of long-lived assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into ataccount actual usage, physical wear
63

and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or near the same time. Upon qualifying related lease term.

JUMP! program upgrades, the customers’ remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible usedOn Demand allows customers to lease a device in good working conditionover a period of up to 18 months and purchaseupgrade it for a new device up to 1 time per month. To date, all of our leased devices were classified as operating leases. At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from inventory to property and equipment. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, onwhich is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of incentives, are generally recognized over the lease term. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value with any write-down recognized asCost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Costs of major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures which do not enhance or extend the asset’s useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Construction costs, labor and overhead incurred in the expansion or enhancement of our wireless network are capitalized. Capitalization commences with pre-construction period administrative and technical activities, which includes obtaining leases, zoning approvals and building permits, and ceases at the point at which the asset is ready for its intended use. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. Capitalized interest is reported as a new EIP.reduction in interest expense and depreciated over the useful life of the related assets.


For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we defer and recognize a liability,We record an asset retirement obligation for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of legal obligations associated with the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guaranteeretirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is valued basedaccreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on various economicwhich our network infrastructure and customer behavioral assumptions,administrative assets are located.

We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.

Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists are amortized using the sum-of-the-years'-digits method over the expected period in which requires judgment, including estimating the customer'srelationship is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The remaining EIP balance at trade-in,finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the expectedstraight-line method.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.

Spectrum Licenses

Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the used device at trade-in,spectrum licenses and the probabilitycosts to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and timingat a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of trade-in. When customers upgradeour spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.

64

At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment and transferred at their device,carrying value, net of any impairment, to assets held for sale included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valued at fair value and the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.

Rent Expense

Mostspectrum licenses obtained, book value of the leasesspectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain and included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our tower sites have fixed rent escalations which provide for periodic increases in the amountConsolidated Statements of rent payable over time. We calculate straight-line rent expense for eachComprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of these leasesspectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the fixed non-cancellable termtransaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the book value of the lease plus all periods, if any, for which failure to renewassets transferred or exchanged.

Impairment

We assess the lease imposes a penalty on us in such amount that a renewal appears, at lease inception or significant modification, to be reasonably assured. We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably assured of being exercised, including the continued maturationcarrying value of our network nationwide, technological advances withingoodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the telecommunications industry andquantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the availability of alternative sites. We make significant assumptions at lease inception in determining and assessing the factors that constitute a “penalty.” In doing so, we primarily consider costs incurred in acquiring and developing new sites, the useful life of site improvements and equipment costs, future economic conditions and the extent to which improvements in wireless technologies can be incorporated into a currentqualitative assessment of whether an economic compulsion will exist in the future to renew a lease.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is maintained against deferred tax assets whenindicates it is more likely than not that some portion or allthe fair value of the deferred tax assets will2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not be realized. The ultimate realizationexceed the total amount of a deferred tax asset dependsgoodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on the ability to generate sufficient taxable incomean aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.overall business at a national level. We consider many factors when determining whethermay elect to first perform a valuation allowance is needed, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future income, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expectedqualitative assessment to be taken in a tax return. We assessdetermine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.


To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assessed the risk of a change in the fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change of positive 150 and negative 50 basis points. As of December 31, 2016, the change in the fair value of our Senior Secured Term Loans,an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:
 Carrying Amount Fair Value Fair Value Assuming
(in millions)  +150 Basis Point Shift -50 Basis Point Shift
Senior Secured Term Loans$1,980
 $2,005
 $1,864
 $2,055



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and ofdiscounted cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiariesat December 31, 2016and December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2016in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordanceassociated with the standards ofintangible asset, to estimate the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and performprice at which an orderly transaction to sell the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whetherasset would take place between market participants at the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.measurement date under current market conditions.


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 14, 2017


T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Balance SheetsCash and Cash Equivalents


As of December 31, 2019, our Cash and cash equivalents were $1.5 billion compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2018.

Free Cash Flow

Free Cash Flow represents Net cash provided by operating activities less payments for Purchases of property and equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash
43

(in millions, except share and per share amounts)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Assets   
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$5,500
 $4,582
Short-term investments
 2,998
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $102 and $1161,896
 1,788
Equipment installment plan receivables, net1,930
 2,378
Accounts receivable from affiliates40
 36
Inventories1,111
 1,295
Asset purchase deposit2,203
 
Other current assets1,537
 1,813
Total current assets14,217
 14,890
Property and equipment, net20,943
 20,000
Goodwill1,683
 1,683
Spectrum licenses27,014
 23,955
Other intangible assets, net376
 594
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net984
 847
Other assets674
 444
Total assets$65,891
 $62,413
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   
Current liabilities   
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$7,152
 $8,084
Payables to affiliates125
 135
Short-term debt354
 182
Deferred revenue986
 717
Other current liabilities405
 410
Total current liabilities9,022
 9,528
Long-term debt21,832
 20,461
Long-term debt to affiliates5,600
 5,600
Tower obligations2,621
 2,658
Deferred tax liabilities4,938
 4,061
Deferred rent expense2,616
 2,481
Other long-term liabilities1,026
 1,067
Total long-term liabilities38,633
 36,328
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

Stockholders' equity   
5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock Series A, par value $0.00001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,000,000 and 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding; $1,000 and $1,000 aggregate liquidation value
 
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 827,768,818 and 819,773,724 shares issued, 826,357,331 and 818,391,219 shares outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital38,846
 38,666
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,411,487 and 1,382,505 shares issued(1) 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1
 (1)
Accumulated deficit(20,610) (22,108)
Total stockholders' equity18,236
 16,557
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$65,891
 $62,413
payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs. Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management, investors and analysts of our financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.


In 2019, we sold tower sites for proceeds of $38 million which are included in Proceeds from sales of tower sites within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As these proceeds were from the sale of fixed assets and are used by management to assess cash available for capital expenditures during the year, we determined the proceeds are relevant for the calculation of Free Cash Flow and included them in the table below. Other proceeds from the sale of fixed assets for the periods presented are not significant. We have presented the impact of the sales in the table below, which illustrates the calculation of Free Cash Flow and reconciles Free Cash Flow to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,925  75 %$68  %
Cash purchases of property and equipment(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) (850) 15 %(304) %
Proceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  38  NM  —  NM  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  (1,530) (28)%1,087  25 %
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 184  (87)%(24) 13 %
Free Cash Flow$4,319  $3,552  $2,725  $767  22 %$827  30 %

Free Cash Flow increased $767 million, or 22%, primarily from:

Higher Net cash provided by operating activities, as described above; and
Lower Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; partially offset by
Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; and
Higher Cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $473 million and $362 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Free Cash Flow includes $442 million and $86 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Borrowing Capacity and Debt Financing

As of December 31, 2019, our total debt and financing lease liabilities were $27.3 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $24.9 billion was classified as long-term debt.

Effective April 28, 2019, we redeemed $600 million aggregate principal amount of our DT Senior Reset Notes. The accompanying notes are an integral partwere redeemed at a redemption price equal to 104.666% of these consolidated financial statements.

T-Mobile US, Inc.
the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon) and were paid on April 29, 2019. The redemption premium was $28 million and was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)2016 2015 2014
Revenues     
Branded postpaid revenues$18,138
 $16,383
 $14,392
Branded prepaid revenues8,553
 7,553
 6,986
Wholesale revenues903
 692
 731
Roaming and other service revenues250
 193
 266
Total service revenues27,844
 24,821
 22,375
Equipment revenues8,727
 6,718
 6,789
Other revenues671
 514
 400
Total revenues37,242
 32,053
 29,564
Operating expenses     
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below5,731
 5,554
 5,788
Cost of equipment sales10,819
 9,344
 9,621
Selling, general and administrative11,378
 10,189
 8,863
Depreciation and amortization6,243
 4,688
 4,412
Cost of MetroPCS business combination104
 376
 299
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses(835) (163) (840)
Other, net
 
 5
Total operating expenses33,440
 29,988
 28,148
Operating income3,802
 2,065
 1,416
Other income (expense)     
Interest expense(1,418) (1,085) (1,073)
Interest expense to affiliates(312) (411) (278)
Interest income261
 420
 359
Other expense, net(6) (11) (11)
Total other expense, net(1,475) (1,087) (1,003)
Income before income taxes2,327
 978
 413
Income tax expense(867) (245) (166)
Net income1,460
 733
 247
Dividends on preferred stock(55) (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,405
 $678
 $247
      
Net income$1,460
 $733
 $247
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax     
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $1, $(1) and $(1)2
 (2) (2)
Other comprehensive income (loss)2
 (2) (2)
Total comprehensive income$1,462
 $731
 $245
Earnings per share     
Basic$1.71
 $0.83
 $0.31
Diluted$1.69
 $0.82
 $0.30
Weighted average shares outstanding     
Basic822,470,275
 812,994,028
 805,284,712
Diluted833,054,545
 822,617,938
 815,922,258

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

T-Mobile US, Inc.
and in Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Operating activities     
Net income$1,460
 $733
 $247
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities     
Depreciation and amortization6,243
 4,688
 4,412
Stock-based compensation expense235
 201
 196
Deferred income tax expense914
 256
 122
Bad debt expense477
 547
 444
Losses from sales of receivables228
 204
 179
Deferred rent expense121
 167
 225
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses(835) (163) (840)
Change in embedded derivatives(25) 148
 (18)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities     
Accounts receivable(603) (259) (90)
Equipment installment plan receivables97
 1,089
 (2,429)
Inventories(802) (2,495) (499)
Deferred purchase price from sales of receivables(270) (185) (204)
Other current and long-term assets(133) (217) (328)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1,201) 693
 2,395
Other current and long-term liabilities158
 22
 312
Other, net71
 (15) 22
Net cash provided by operating activities6,135
 5,414
 4,146
Investing activities     
Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $142, $246 and $64(4,702) (4,724) (4,317)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(3,968) (1,935) (2,900)
Purchases of short-term investments
 (2,997) 
Sales of short-term investments2,998
 
 
Other, net(8) 96
 (29)
Net cash used in investing activities(5,680) (9,560) (7,246)
Financing activities     
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt997
 3,979
 2,993
Proceeds from tower obligations
 140
 
Repayments of capital lease obligations(205) (57) (19)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net(150) (564) (418)
Repayments of long-term debt(20) 
 (1,000)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options29
 47
 27
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
 
 982
Tax withholdings on share-based awards(121) (156) (73)
Dividends on preferred stock(55) (55) 
Other, net(12) 79
 32
Net cash provided by financing activities463
 3,413
 2,524
Change in cash and cash equivalents918
 (733) (576)
Cash and cash equivalents     
Beginning of period4,582
 5,315
 5,891
End of period$5,500
 $4,582
 $5,315
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information     
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized$1,681
 $1,298
 $1,367
Income tax payments25
 54
 36
Changes in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment285
 46
 402
Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment1,588
 2,451
 
Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory(602) (166) 
Issuance of short-term debt for financing of property and equipment150
 500
 256
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations799
 470
 77
Certain components of the reset features were required to be bifurcated from the DT Senior Reset Notes and were separately accounted for as embedded derivatives. The accompanying notes are an integral partwrite-off of these consolidated financial statements.

T-Mobile US, Inc.
embedded derivatives upon redemption resulted in a gain of $11 million, which was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in millions, except shares)Preferred Stock Outstanding Common Stock Outstanding Treasury Shares at Cost Par Value and Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) Accumulated Deficit Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 801,879,804
 $
 $37,330
 $3
 $(23,088) $14,245
Net income
 
 
 
 
 247
 247
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Issuance of preferred stock20,000,000
 
 
 982
 
 
 982
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 196
 
 
 196
Exercise of stock options
 1,496,365
 
 27
 
 
 27
Issuance of vested restricted stock units
 6,296,107
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards
 (2,203,673) 
 (73) 
 
 (73)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
 
 
 34
 
 
 34
Other
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
Balance as of December 31, 201420,000,000
 807,468,603
 
 38,503
 1
 (22,841) 15,663
Net income
 
 
 
 
 733
 733
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 227
 
 
 227
Exercise of stock options
 2,381,650
 
 47
 
 
 47
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan
 761,085
 
 21
 
 
 21
Issuance of vested restricted stock units
 11,956,345
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options
 (4,176,464) 
 (156) 
 
 (156)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
 
 
 79
 
 
 79
Dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 (55) 
 
 (55)
Balance as of December 31, 201520,000,000
 818,391,219
 
 38,666
 (1) (22,108) 16,557
Net income
 
 
 
 
 1,460
 1,460
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 2
 
 2
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 264
 
 
 264
Exercise of stock options
 982,904
 
 29
 
 
 29
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan
 1,905,534
 
 63
 
 
 63
Issuance of vested restricted stock units
 7,712,463
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options
 (2,605,807) 
 (122) 
 
 (122)
Transfer RSU to NQDC plan
 (28,982) (1) 1
 
 
 
Dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 (55) 
 
 (55)
Prior year Retained Earnings (Note 1)
 
 
 
 
 38
 38
Balance as of December 31, 201620,000,000
 826,357,331
 $(1) $38,846
 $1
 $(20,610) $18,236

The accompanying notes are an integral partComprehensive Income. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of these consolidated financial statements.


T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index forthe Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


We maintain a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with DT which is comprised of a $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and a $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. In December 2019, we amended the terms of the revolving credit facility with DT to extend the maturity date to December 29, 2022. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding balances.

44

We maintain vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we utilized $800 million and repaid $775 million under the vendor financing arrangements. Invoices subject to extended payment terms have various due dates through the first quarter of 2020. Payments on vendor financing agreements are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2019, there were $25 million in outstanding borrowings under the vendor financing agreements which were included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, there was no outstanding balance.



Consents on Debt

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018, we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain of our existing debt and certain existing debt of our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile US, Inc.USA entered into a financing matters agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to the incurrence by
T-Mobile USA of secured debt in connection with and after the consummation of the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


Commitment Letter

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we expect to incur certain fees payable to the financial institutions, including certain financing fees on the secured term loan commitment. If the Merger closes, we will incur additional fees for the financial institutions structuring and providing the commitments and certain take-out fees associated with the issuance of permanent secured bond debt in lieu of the secured bridge loan. In total, we may incur up to approximately $340 million in fees associated with the Commitment Letter. We began incurring certain Commitment Letter fees on November 1, 2019, which were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There were $12 million of fees accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity

We may seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2020, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt and stock purchases.

In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In November 2019, we extended the mandatory termination date on our interest rate lock derivatives to June 3, 2020. In December 2019, we made net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaling $632 million, which included variation margin transfers to (or from) such derivative counterparties based on daily market movements. These collateral transfers are included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheetsand inNet cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The interest rate lock derivatives will be settled upon the earlier of the issuance of fixed-rate debt or the current mandatory termination date. Upon settlement of the interest rate lock derivatives, we will receive, or make, a cash payment in the amount of the fair value of the cash flow hedge as of the settlement date. We expect our existing sources of liquidity to be sufficient to meet the requirements of the interest rate lock derivatives.
45

We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment.

The indentures and credit facilities governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to incur more debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock, make certain investments, repurchase stock, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to the Parent. However, the Issuer is allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2019.

Financing Lease Facilities

We have entered into uncommitted financing lease facilities with certain partners, which provide us with the ability to enter into financing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2019, we have committed to $3.9 billion of financing leases under these financing lease facilities, of which $898 million was executed during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Capital Expenditures

Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses and the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to our network transformation, including the build-out of our network to utilize our 600 MHz spectrum licenses and the deployment of 5G. We expect cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of approximately $400 million, to be $5.9 to $6.2 billion and cash purchases of property and equipment, excluding capitalized interest, to be $5.5 to $5.8 billion in 2020. This includes expenditures for 600 MHz and 5G deployment. This does not include property and equipment obtained through financing lease agreements, vendor financing agreements, leased wireless devices transferred from inventory or any additional purchases of spectrum licenses.

Share Repurchases

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program was completed on April 29, 2018.

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our common stock through the year ending December 31, 2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the Transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no repurchases of our common stock under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018. See Note 12 - Repurchases of Common Stock of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
46

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 2019 and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
(in millions)Less Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years4 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 YearsTotal
Long-term debt (1)
$—  $5,500  $7,300  $12,200  $25,000  
Interest on long-term debt1,282  2,365  1,796  1,163  6,606  
Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest1,013  1,147  172  115  2,447  
Tower obligations (2)
160  321  320  467  1,268  
Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest2,754  4,894  3,523  3,797  14,968  
Purchase obligations (3)
3,603  3,263  1,597  1,387  9,850  
Total contractual obligations$8,812  $17,490  $14,708  $19,129  $60,139  
(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, financing lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements. See Note 8 – Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2019 under normal business purposes. See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absence of historical trending to be used as a predictor of such payments. See Note 17 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase and lease spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. Where we are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether we take delivery, we have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. The acquisition of spectrum licenses is subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.

In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Balances related to the cash flow hedges have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the amount and timing of settlements. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Related Party Transactions

We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing. See Note 17 - Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.

47

As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2019, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with DT. We have relied upon DT for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.

DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: MTN Irancell, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2019, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.

In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable and service accounts receivable on a revolving basis as a source of liquidity. As of December 31, 2019, we derecognized net receivables of $2.6 billion upon sale through these arrangements. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Eight of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.

Leases

We adopted the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 and recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded.

Significant Judgments:

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights. Identification of a lease may require significant judgment.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent will no longer be presented separately.

48

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to new leases in determining the expected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

49

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 15 - Leases of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Revenue Recognition

We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances,” below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances”, below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.

50

Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 - Revenue From Contracts with Customers of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Allowances

We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is management’s estimate of such losses inherent in our receivables portfolio, comprised of accounts receivable and EIP receivable segments. Changes in the allowance for credit losses and, therefore, in related provision for credit losses (“bad debt expense”) can materially affect earnings. Credit risk characteristics are assessed for each receivable segment. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the allowance for credit losses, management considers a number of factors, including receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions. While our methodology attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments, the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Management also considers an amount that represents management’s judgment of risks inherent in the process and assumptions used in establishing the allowance for credit losses, including process risk and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.

To the extent that actual loss experience differs significantly from historical trends or assumptions, the appropriate allowance levels for realized credit losses could differ from the estimate. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.

We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments over a period of up to 36 months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. Receivables held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the recorded amount of the EIP receivables and their unpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement and recorded as a reduction in transaction price. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate credit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

Deferred Purchase Price Assets

In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates and credit worthiness, dilutions and recoveries. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

51

Depreciation

Depreciation commences once assets have been placed in service. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property, plant and equipment. These studies consider actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate that the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book values are depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5 – Property and Equipment of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding depreciation of assets, including management’s underlying estimates of useful lives.


DescriptionEvaluation of BusinessGoodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment


We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We employed a qualitative approach to assess the wireless reporting unit. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying aggregate fair value.

We employed a quantitative approach to assess the Layer3 reporting unit. The fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit is determined using an income approach, which is based on estimated discounted future cash flows.

We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:

Expected cash flows underlying the Layer3 business plan for the periods 2020 through 2024, which took into account estimates of subscribers for TVision services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures.
Cash flows beyond 2024 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain.
We used a discount rate of 32% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.

The estimated fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 3% as of December 31, 2019. Delays in the national launch of TVision services or cash flows that do not meet our projections could result in a goodwill impairment of Layer3 in the future. The carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Layer3 reporting unit was $218 million as of December 31, 2019.

52

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield methodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses). The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield methodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield methodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.

The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues, EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and the long-term growth rate. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant AccountingPolicies and Note 6 – Goodwill, Spectrum License Transactions and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our annual impairment test and impairment charges.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.

We are exposed to changes in interest rates on our Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, our majority stockholder. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in the fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for 30-day LIBOR rates of positive 150 and negative 50 basis points. In cases where the debt is redeemable and the fair value calculation results in a liability greater than the cost to replace the debt, the maximum liability is assumed to
53

be no greater than the current cost to redeem the debt. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our Incremental Term Loan Facility, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:

Carrying AmountFair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+150 Basis Point Shift-50 Basis Point Shift
LIBOR plus 1.50% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022$2,000  $2,000  $1,966  $2,000  
LIBOR plus 1.75% Senior Secured Term Loan due 20242,000  2,000  1,956  2,000  

We are exposed to changes in the benchmark interest rate associated with our interest rate lock derivatives. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for eight and 10-year LIBOR swap rates of positive 200 and negative 100 basis points. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our interest rate lock derivatives, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:
Fair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+200 Basis Point Shift-100 Basis Point Shift
Interest rate lock derivatives$(1,170) $410  $(2,077) 





































54

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” orand its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the “Company”related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”), together. We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and MetroPCS,accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”), Puerto Ricoof America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Changes in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues in 2018.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. Virgin Islands. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We provide mobile communications services primarily using 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) technology. Weconducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tabletsincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale,significant estimates made by management, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”)evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and leasing through JUMP On Demand™. Additionally,testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide reinsurancea reasonable basis for handset insuranceour opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and extended warranty contracts offeredprocedures that (i) pertain to our mobile communications customers.the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the

55

Basiscompany; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of Presentationunauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements includethat was communicated or required to be communicated to the balancesaudit committee and resultsthat (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of operations of T-Mobile andcritical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated subsidiaries. We operatefinancial statements, taken as a single operating segment. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) wherewhole, and we are deemednot, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Adoption of Leases Standard

As described in Notes 1 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the new accounting standard on Leases, on January 1, 2019, by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. As a result, among other adjustments, the Company recognized operating lease right-of-use assets of $9,251 million and operating lease liabilities of $11,364 million on the balance sheet on the date of adoption. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying amounts of operating and finance lease right-of-use assets were $10,933 million and $2,715 million respectively and operating and finance lease liabilities were $12,826 million and $2,303 million respectively. The Company recorded $3,406 million of lease expense during the year. Management also reassessed the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites to determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. This reassessment resulted in (i) assets relating to 6,200 tower sites transferred pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement continuing to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks; (ii) a sale being recognized for 1,400 tower sites sold that were not associated with the primary beneficiarymaster prepaid lease. Upon adoption, the Company derecognized its existing long-term financial obligation and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactionsthe tower-related property and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites.


Certain prior year amountsThe principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentationlease standard is a critical audit matter are (i) there was significant judgment by management in applying the lease standard to a large volume of Debt Issuance Costs,” have been reclassified to conformleases in the company’s lease portfolio; (ii) implementation of new lease accounting systems resulted in material changes to the current presentation. See “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted DuringCompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) significant judgment in the Current Year” below.application of the standard relating to sale-leaseback accounting. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the implementation of new lease accounting systems and management’s significant judgments, including the assessment of the previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites. The audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from the procedures.


Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the adoption of the new standard on the Company’s various lease portfolios, including those associated with previously failed sale-leaseback transactions and testing of controls over the implementation and functionality of the new lease accounting systems. The preparationprocedures also included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of financial statementsmanagement’s identification of the leases in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires ourthe Company’s lease portfolios and evaluating the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management to make estimatesidentify contractual terms in lease arrangements that impact the determination of the right-of-use asset and assumptions which affectlease liability amount recognized. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist with the financial statements and accompanying notes. Examples include service revenues earned but not yet billed, service revenues billed but not yet earned, relative selling prices, allowances for uncollectible accounts and sales returns, discounts for imputed interest on EIP receivables, guarantee liabilities, losses incurred but not yet reported, tax liabilities, deferred income taxes including valuation allowances, useful livesevaluation of long-lived assets, cost estimates of asset retirement obligations, residual values on leased handsets, reasonably assured renewal terms for operating leases, stock-based compensation forfeiture rates, and fair value measurements related to goodwill, spectrum licenses, intangible assets, and derivative financial instruments. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable underprevious failed sales-leaseback tower sites.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 6, 2020

We have served as the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from those estimates.Company’s auditor since 2001.




56

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cash and Cash Equivalents


As of December 31, 2019, our Cash and cash equivalents were $1.5 billion compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2018.

Free Cash Flow

Free Cash Flow represents Net cash provided by operating activities less payments for Purchases of property and equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash
43

payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs. Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management, investors and analysts of our financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.

In 2019, we sold tower sites for proceeds of $38 million which are included in Proceeds from sales of tower sites within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As these proceeds were from the sale of fixed assets and are used by management to assess cash available for capital expenditures during the year, we determined the proceeds are relevant for the calculation of Free Cash Flow and included them in the table below. Other proceeds from the sale of fixed assets for the periods presented are not significant. We have presented the impact of the sales in the table below, which illustrates the calculation of Free Cash Flow and reconciles Free Cash Flow to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Year Ended December 31,2019 Versus 20182018 Versus 2017
(in millions)201920182017$ Change% Change$ Change% Change
Net cash provided by operating activities$6,824  $3,899  $3,831  $2,925  75 %$68  %
Cash purchases of property and equipment(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) (850) 15 %(304) %
Proceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  38  NM  —  NM  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  (1,530) (28)%1,087  25 %
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 184  (87)%(24) 13 %
Free Cash Flow$4,319  $3,552  $2,725  $767  22 %$827  30 %

Free Cash Flow increased $767 million, or 22%, primarily from:

Higher Net cash provided by operating activities, as described above; and
Lower Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; partially offset by
Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; and
Higher Cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $473 million and $362 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Free Cash Flow includes $442 million and $86 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Borrowing Capacity and Debt Financing

As of December 31, 2019, our total debt and financing lease liabilities were $27.3 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $24.9 billion was classified as long-term debt.

Effective April 28, 2019, we redeemed $600 million aggregate principal amount of our DT Senior Reset Notes. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 104.666% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon) and were paid on April 29, 2019. The redemption premium was $28 million and was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and in Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Certain components of the reset features were required to be bifurcated from the DT Senior Reset Notes and were separately accounted for as embedded derivatives. The write-off of embedded derivatives upon redemption resulted in a gain of $11 million, which was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

We maintain a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with DT which is comprised of a $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and a $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. In December 2019, we amended the terms of the revolving credit facility with DT to extend the maturity date to December 29, 2022. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no outstanding balances.

44

We maintain vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we utilized $800 million and repaid $775 million under the vendor financing arrangements. Invoices subject to extended payment terms have various due dates through the first quarter of 2020. Payments on vendor financing agreements are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2019, there were $25 million in outstanding borrowings under the vendor financing agreements which were included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, there was no outstanding balance.

Consents on Debt

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018, we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain of our existing debt and certain existing debt of our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a financing matters agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to the incurrence by
T-Mobile USA of secured debt in connection with and after the consummation of the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Commitment Letter

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we expect to incur certain fees payable to the financial institutions, including certain financing fees on the secured term loan commitment. If the Merger closes, we will incur additional fees for the financial institutions structuring and providing the commitments and certain take-out fees associated with the issuance of permanent secured bond debt in lieu of the secured bridge loan. In total, we may incur up to approximately $340 million in fees associated with the Commitment Letter. We began incurring certain Commitment Letter fees on November 1, 2019, which were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There were $12 million of fees accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity

We may seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2020, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt and stock purchases.

In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In November 2019, we extended the mandatory termination date on our interest rate lock derivatives to June 3, 2020. In December 2019, we made net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaling $632 million, which included variation margin transfers to (or from) such derivative counterparties based on daily market movements. These collateral transfers are included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheetsand inNet cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The interest rate lock derivatives will be settled upon the earlier of the issuance of fixed-rate debt or the current mandatory termination date. Upon settlement of the interest rate lock derivatives, we will receive, or make, a cash payment in the amount of the fair value of the cash flow hedge as of the settlement date. We expect our existing sources of liquidity to be sufficient to meet the requirements of the interest rate lock derivatives.
45

We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment.

The indentures and credit facilities governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to incur more debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock, make certain investments, repurchase stock, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to the Parent. However, the Issuer is allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2019.

Financing Lease Facilities

We have entered into uncommitted financing lease facilities with certain partners, which provide us with the ability to enter into financing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2019, we have committed to $3.9 billion of financing leases under these financing lease facilities, of which $898 million was executed during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Capital Expenditures

Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses and the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to our network transformation, including the build-out of our network to utilize our 600 MHz spectrum licenses and the deployment of 5G. We expect cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of approximately $400 million, to be $5.9 to $6.2 billion and cash purchases of property and equipment, excluding capitalized interest, to be $5.5 to $5.8 billion in 2020. This includes expenditures for 600 MHz and 5G deployment. This does not include property and equipment obtained through financing lease agreements, vendor financing agreements, leased wireless devices transferred from inventory or any additional purchases of spectrum licenses.

Share Repurchases

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program was completed on April 29, 2018.

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our common stock through the year ending December 31, 2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the Transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no repurchases of our common stock under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018. See Note 12 - Repurchases of Common Stock of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
46

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 2019 and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
(in millions)Less Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years4 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 YearsTotal
Long-term debt (1)
$—  $5,500  $7,300  $12,200  $25,000  
Interest on long-term debt1,282  2,365  1,796  1,163  6,606  
Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest1,013  1,147  172  115  2,447  
Tower obligations (2)
160  321  320  467  1,268  
Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest2,754  4,894  3,523  3,797  14,968  
Purchase obligations (3)
3,603  3,263  1,597  1,387  9,850  
Total contractual obligations$8,812  $17,490  $14,708  $19,129  $60,139  
(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, financing lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements. See Note 8 – Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2019 under normal business purposes. See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absence of historical trending to be used as a predictor of such payments. See Note 17 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase and lease spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. Where we are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether we take delivery, we have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. The acquisition of spectrum licenses is subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.

In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Balances related to the cash flow hedges have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the amount and timing of settlements. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Related Party Transactions

We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing. See Note 17 - Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.

47

As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2019, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with DT. We have relied upon DT for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.

DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: MTN Irancell, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2019, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.

In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable and service accounts receivable on a revolving basis as a source of liquidity. As of December 31, 2019, we derecognized net receivables of $2.6 billion upon sale through these arrangements. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Eight of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.

Leases

We adopted the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 and recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded.

Significant Judgments:

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights. Identification of a lease may require significant judgment.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent will no longer be presented separately.

48

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to new leases in determining the expected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

49

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 15 - Leases of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Revenue Recognition

We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances,” below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Allowances”, below, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.

50

Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment.

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 - Revenue From Contracts with Customers of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Allowances

We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is management’s estimate of such losses inherent in our receivables portfolio, comprised of accounts receivable and EIP receivable segments. Changes in the allowance for credit losses and, therefore, in related provision for credit losses (“bad debt expense”) can materially affect earnings. Credit risk characteristics are assessed for each receivable segment. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the allowance for credit losses, management considers a number of factors, including receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions. While our methodology attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments, the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Management also considers an amount that represents management’s judgment of risks inherent in the process and assumptions used in establishing the allowance for credit losses, including process risk and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.

To the extent that actual loss experience differs significantly from historical trends or assumptions, the appropriate allowance levels for realized credit losses could differ from the estimate. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.

We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments over a period of up to 36 months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. Receivables held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the recorded amount of the EIP receivables and their unpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement and recorded as a reduction in transaction price. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate credit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

Deferred Purchase Price Assets

In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates and credit worthiness, dilutions and recoveries. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

51

Depreciation

Depreciation commences once assets have been placed in service. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property, plant and equipment. These studies consider actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate that the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book values are depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5 – Property and Equipment of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding depreciation of assets, including management’s underlying estimates of useful lives.

Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment

We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We employed a qualitative approach to assess the wireless reporting unit. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying aggregate fair value.

We employed a quantitative approach to assess the Layer3 reporting unit. The fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit is determined using an income approach, which is based on estimated discounted future cash flows.

We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:

Expected cash flows underlying the Layer3 business plan for the periods 2020 through 2024, which took into account estimates of subscribers for TVision services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures.
Cash flows beyond 2024 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain.
We used a discount rate of 32% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.

The estimated fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 3% as of December 31, 2019. Delays in the national launch of TVision services or cash flows that do not meet our projections could result in a goodwill impairment of Layer3 in the future. The carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Layer3 reporting unit was $218 million as of December 31, 2019.

52

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield methodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses). The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield methodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield methodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.

The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues, EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and the long-term growth rate. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant AccountingPolicies and Note 6 – Goodwill, Spectrum License Transactions and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our annual impairment test and impairment charges.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.

We are exposed to changes in interest rates on our Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, our majority stockholder. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in the fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for 30-day LIBOR rates of positive 150 and negative 50 basis points. In cases where the debt is redeemable and the fair value calculation results in a liability greater than the cost to replace the debt, the maximum liability is assumed to
53

be no greater than the current cost to redeem the debt. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our Incremental Term Loan Facility, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:

Carrying AmountFair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+150 Basis Point Shift-50 Basis Point Shift
LIBOR plus 1.50% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022$2,000  $2,000  $1,966  $2,000  
LIBOR plus 1.75% Senior Secured Term Loan due 20242,000  2,000  1,956  2,000  

We are exposed to changes in the benchmark interest rate associated with our interest rate lock derivatives. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, we selected hypothetical changes in market rates that are expected to reflect reasonably possible near-term changes in those rates. We assessed the risk of a change in fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change for eight and 10-year LIBOR swap rates of positive 200 and negative 100 basis points. As of December 31, 2019, the change in the fair value of our interest rate lock derivatives, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:
Fair ValueFair Value Assuming
(in millions)+200 Basis Point Shift-100 Basis Point Shift
Interest rate lock derivatives$(1,170) $410  $(2,077) 





































54

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Changes in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues in 2018.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
55

company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Adoption of Leases Standard

As described in Notes 1 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the new accounting standard on Leases, on January 1, 2019, by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. As a result, among other adjustments, the Company recognized operating lease right-of-use assets of $9,251 million and operating lease liabilities of $11,364 million on the balance sheet on the date of adoption. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying amounts of operating and finance lease right-of-use assets were $10,933 million and $2,715 million respectively and operating and finance lease liabilities were $12,826 million and $2,303 million respectively. The Company recorded $3,406 million of lease expense during the year. Management also reassessed the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites to determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. This reassessment resulted in (i) assets relating to 6,200 tower sites transferred pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement continuing to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks; (ii) a sale being recognized for 1,400 tower sites sold that were not associated with the master prepaid lease. Upon adoption, the Company derecognized its existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the adoption of the lease standard is a critical audit matter are (i) there was significant judgment by management in applying the lease standard to a large volume of leases in the company’s lease portfolio; (ii) implementation of new lease accounting systems resulted in material changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) significant judgment in the application of the standard relating to sale-leaseback accounting. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the implementation of new lease accounting systems and management’s significant judgments, including the assessment of the previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites. The audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from the procedures.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the adoption of the new standard on the Company’s various lease portfolios, including those associated with previously failed sale-leaseback transactions and testing of controls over the implementation and functionality of the new lease accounting systems. The procedures also included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of management’s identification of the leases in the Company’s lease portfolios and evaluating the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management to identify contractual terms in lease arrangements that impact the determination of the right-of-use asset and lease liability amount recognized. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist with the evaluation of previous failed sales-leaseback tower sites.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 6, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.



56

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions, except share and per share amounts)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,528  $1,203  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $61 and $671,888  1,769  
Equipment installment plan receivables, net2,600  2,538  
Accounts receivable from affiliates20  11  
Inventory964  1,084  
Other current assets2,305  1,676  
Total current assets9,305  8,281  
Property and equipment, net21,984  23,359  
Operating lease right-of-use assets10,933  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets2,715  —  
Goodwill1,930  1,901  
Spectrum licenses36,465  35,559  
Other intangible assets, net115  198  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
Other assets1,891  1,623  
Total assets$86,921  $72,468  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$6,746  $7,741  
Payables to affiliates187  200  
Short-term debt25  841  
Deferred revenue631  698  
Short-term operating lease liabilities2,287  —  
Short-term financing lease liabilities957  —  
Other current liabilities1,673  787  
Total current liabilities12,506  10,267  
Long-term debt10,958  12,124  
Long-term debt to affiliates13,986  14,582  
Tower obligations2,236  2,557  
Deferred tax liabilities5,607  4,472  
Operating lease liabilities10,539  —  
Financing lease liabilities1,346  —  
Deferred rent expense—  2,781  
Other long-term liabilities954  967  
Total long-term liabilities45,626  37,483  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders' equity
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 858,418,615 and 851,675,119 shares issued, 856,905,400 and 850,180,317 shares outstanding—  —  
Additional paid-in capital38,498  38,010  
Treasury stock, at cost,1,513,215 and 1,494,802 shares issued(8) (6) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(868) (332) 
Accumulated deficit(8,833) (12,954) 
Total stockholders' equity28,789  24,718  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$86,921  $72,468  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
57

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)201920182017
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  
Branded prepaid revenues9,543  9,598  9,380  
Wholesale revenues1,279  1,183  1,102  
Roaming and other service revenues499  349  230  
Total service revenues33,994  31,992  30,160  
Equipment revenues9,840  10,009  9,375  
Other revenues1,164  1,309  1,069  
Total revenues44,998  43,310  40,604  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below6,622  6,307  6,100  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below11,899  12,047  11,608  
Selling, general and administrative14,139  13,161  12,259  
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Total operating expenses39,276  38,001  35,716  
Operating income5,722  5,309  4,888  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense(727) (835) (1,111) 
Interest expense to affiliates(408) (522) (560) 
Interest income24  19  17  
Other expense, net(8) (54) (73) 
Total other expense, net(1,119) (1,392) (1,727) 
Income before income taxes4,603  3,917  3,161  
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,135) (1,029) 1,375  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,481  
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $0, $0, and $2—  —   
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax effect of $(187), $(115), and $0(536) (332) —  
Other comprehensive (loss) income(536) (332)  
Total comprehensive income$2,932  $2,556  $4,543  
Earnings per share
Basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
58

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Operating activities
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization6,616  6,486  5,984  
Stock-based compensation expense495  424  306  
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1,091  980  (1,404) 
Bad debt expense307  297  388  
Losses from sales of receivables130  157  299  
Deferred rent expense—  26  76  
Losses on redemption of debt19  122  86  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable(3,709) (4,617) (3,931) 
Equipment installment plan receivables(1,015) (1,598) (1,812) 
Inventories(617) (201) (844) 
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,896  —  —  
Other current and long-term assets(144) (181) (575) 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities17  (867) 1,079  
Short and long-term operating lease liabilities(2,131) —  —  
Other current and long-term liabilities144  (69) (233) 
Other, net257  52  111  
Net cash provided by operating activities6,824  3,899  3,831  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $473, $362 and $136(6,391) (5,541) (5,237) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits(967) (127) (5,828) 
Proceeds from sales of tower sites38  —  —  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions3,876  5,406  4,319  
Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements(632) —  —  
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired(31) (338) —  
Other, net(18) 21   
Net cash used in investing activities(4,125) (579) (6,745) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt—  2,494  10,480  
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility2,340  6,265  2,910  
Repayments of revolving credit facility(2,340) (6,265) (2,910) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations(798) (700) (486) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net(775) (300) (300) 
Repayments of long-term debt(600) (3,349) (10,230) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (1,071) (427) 
Tax withholdings on share-based awards(156) (146) (166) 
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs(28) (212) (188) 
Other, net(17) (52)  
Net cash used in financing activities(2,374) (3,336) (1,367) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents325  (16) (4,281) 
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period1,203  1,219  5,500  
End of period$1,528  $1,203  $1,219  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized$1,128  $1,525  $2,028  
Operating lease payments (1)
2,783  —  —  
Income tax payments88  51  31  
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Non-cash beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized receivables$6,509  $4,972  $4,063  
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment(935) 65  313  
Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment1,006  1,011  1,131  
Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory(267) (326) (742) 
Short-term debt assumed for financing of property and equipment800  291  292  
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations3,621  —  —  
Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations1,041  885  887  
(1)On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires certain supplemental cash flow disclosures. Where these disclosures or a comparable figure were not required under the former lease standard, we have not retrospectively presented historical amounts. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional details.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
59

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(in millions, except shares)Preferred Stock OutstandingCommon Stock OutstandingTreasury Shares at CostPar Value and Additional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAccumulated DeficitTotal Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of December 31, 201620,000,000  826,357,331  $(1) $38,846  $ $(20,610) $18,236  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  4,536  4,536  
Other comprehensive income—  —  —  —   —   
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  344  —  —  344  
Exercise of stock options—  450,493  —  19  —  —  19  
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  1,832,043  —  82  —  —  82  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  8,338,271  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,754,721) —  (166) —  —  (166) 
Mandatory conversion of preferred shares to common shares(20,000,000) 32,237,983  —  —  —  —  —  
Repurchases of common stock—  (7,010,889) —  (444) —  —  (444) 
Transfer RSU to NQDC plan—  (43,860) (3)  —  —  —  
Dividends on preferred stock—  —  —  (55) —  —  (55) 
Balance as of December 31, 2017—  859,406,651  (4) 38,629   (16,074) 22,559  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  2,888  2,888  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (332) —  (332) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  473  —  —  473  
Exercise of stock options—  187,965  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,011,794  —  103  —  —  103  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  7,448,148  —  —  —  —  —  
Issuance of restricted stock awards—  225,799  —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,321,827) —  (146) —  —  (146) 
Repurchases of common stock—  (16,738,758) —  (1,054) —  —  (1,054) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (39,455) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  (8) 232  224  
Balance as of December 31, 2018—  850,180,317  (6) 38,010  (332) (12,954) 24,718  
Net income—  —  —  —  —  3,468  3,468  
Other comprehensive loss—  —  —  —  (536) —  (536) 
Stock-based compensation—  —  —  517  —  —  517  
Exercise of stock options—  85,083  —   —  —   
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan—  2,091,650  —  124  —  —  124  
Issuance of vested restricted stock units—  6,685,950  —  —  —  —  —  
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards—  (24,682) —  —  —  —  —  
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options—  (2,094,555) —  (156) —  —  (156) 
Transfer RSU from NQDC plan—  (18,363) (2)  —  —  —  
Prior year Retained Earnings(1)
—  —  —  —  —  653  653  
Balance as of December 31, 2019—  856,905,400  $(8) $38,498  $(868) $(8,833) $28,789  
(1)Prior year Retained Earnings represents the impact of the adoption of new accounting standards on beginning Accumulated Deficit and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

60

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


61

T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro™ by T-Mobile ("Metro by T-Mobile"), in the United States (“U.S.”), Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. All of our revenues were earned in, and all of our long-lived assets are located in, the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We provide mobile communications services primarily using our 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network and our newly deployed 5G technology network. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tablets and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”) and leasing through JUMP! On Demand™. Additionally, we provide reinsurance for handset insurance policies and extended warranty contracts offered to our mobile communications customers.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the balances and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We operate as a single operating segment.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. See “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year” below.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase.


Short-Term InvestmentsReceivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Our short-term investments consist of U.S. Treasury securities classified as available for sale, which are stated at fair value and have remaining maturities of more than three months at the date of purchase. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, on available for sale securities are reported as net increases and decreases to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), a component of stockholders' equity, until realized. The estimated fair values of our short-term investments are based on quoted market prices as of the end of the reporting period. The U.S. Treasury securities reported as of December 31, 2015 matured during 2016.

We review our available-for-sale securities for impairment on a quarterly basis or more often if a potential loss-triggering event occurs. If there has been a decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis, we assess whether the impairment is other-than-temporary by considering, among other factors, the reason for the decline in fair value, our intent to sell the security, whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis and whether we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If we determine the impairment is other-than-temporary, we record a charge to Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.


Accounts Receivable and Allowances


Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts billed and currently due from customers, other carriers and third-party retail channels (“dealers”), as well as revenues earned but not yet billed at the end of each period.channels. Accounts receivable not held for sale are reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for credit losses. Accounts receivable held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. We have an arrangement to sell the majority of service accounts receivable on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets. We maintain an allowance for estimated losses inherent in the accounts receivable portfolio based on a number of factors, including historical experience and current collection trends, aging of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.


Equipment Installment Plan Receivables

We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and certain other purchases in installments typically over a period of 24, but up to 2436, months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reported in the balance sheetour Consolidated Balance Sheets at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs, allowance for credit losses and unamortized discounts. Accounts receivable held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the EIP term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIP receivables and record thereceivables. The EIP receivables are recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the present valuerecorded amount of the EIP receivables and their faceunpaid principal balance (i.e., the contractual amount due from the customer) results in a discount which is allocated to the performance obligations in the arrangement and recorded as a direct reduction to the carrying value with a corresponding reduction to equipmentin transaction price in Total service revenues and Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income. We determine the imputed discount rate based primarily on current market interest rates and the amount of expectedestimated credit lossesrisk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate valuationcredit loss allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows resulting from credit risk are included in the initial present value measurement of the receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is
62

amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Interest incomeOther revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income.


Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.  The allowance is based on a number of factors, including collection experience, aging

Total imputed discount and allowances were approximately 7.0% and 8.1% of the total amount of gross accounts receivable, including EIP receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer basereceivables, at December 31, 2019 and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date. Equipment sales not reasonably assured to be collectible are recorded on a cash basis as payments are received.2018, respectively.


The current portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables, net and the long-term portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets. We have an arrangement to sell certain EIP receivables on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.


We maintain an allowance for credit losses and determine its appropriateness through an established process that assesses the losses inherent in our receivables portfolio. We develop and document our allowance methodology at the portfolio segment level - accounts receivable portfolio and EIP receivable portfolio segments. While we attribute portions of the allowance to our respective accounts receivable and EIP portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.

Our process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique risk characteristics of our accounts receivable and EIP receivable portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, losses are estimated collectively for groups of receivables with similar characteristics. Our allowance levels are influenced by receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as macro-economic conditions.

Inventories


Inventories consist primarily of wireless devices and accessories, which are valued at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is determined using standard cost which approximates average cost. Shipping and handling costs paid to wireless device and accessories vendors, and costs to refurbish used devices recovered through our device upgrade programs are included in the standard cost of inventory. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We record inventory write-downs to net realizable value for obsolete and slow-moving items based on inventory turnover trends and historical experience.


Long-Lived Assets


Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. All of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.


Property and Equipment


Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communicationcommunications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communicationcommunications systems include assets to operate our wireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the retirement of long-lived assets and capital leases.assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.


Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of usefuldepreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into account actual usage, physical wear
63

and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.


In 2015, we introduced JUMP! On Demand which allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new onedevice up to three times in a 12 month period.1 time per month. To date, all of our leased devices were classified as operating leases by considering critical elements of the lease arrangement such as the lease term and the economic life, fair value and residual value of the device.leases. At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from inventory to property and equipment. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term.term and considers expected losses. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of incentives, are generally recognized over the lease term. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value with any write-down to market recognized asCost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income.


Costs of major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures which do not enhance or extend the asset’s useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Construction costs, labor and overhead incurred in the expansion or enhancement of our wireless network are capitalized. Capitalization commences with pre-construction period administrative and technical activities, which includes obtaining leases, zoning approvals and building permits, and ceases at the point at which the asset is ready for its intended use. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. Capitalized interest is reported as a reduction in interest expense and depreciated over the useful life of the related assets.

Future obligations related to capital leases are included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Depreciation of assets held under capital leases is included in Depreciation and amortization expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.


We record an asset retirement obligation for the fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.


We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.


Other Intangible Assets


Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists are amortized using the sum-of-the-years-digitssum-of-the-years'-digits method over the expected period in which the relationship is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The remaining finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.


Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets


Goodwill


Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.


Spectrum Licenses


Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communicationcommunications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.


64

At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment and transferred at their carrying value, net of any impairment, to assets held for sale included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valued at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the spectrum licenses obtained, book value of the spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain and included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the book value of the assets transferred or exchanged.


Impairment


We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.


WeWhen assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether itif the quantitative impairment test is more likely than not the fair value of the single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the single2 reporting unitunits, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is testedwe perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for impairment based on a two-step test. In the first step, we compareamount by which the fair value ofcarrying amount exceeds the reporting unit tounit’s fair value; however, the carrying value. The fair value ofloss recognized would not exceed the reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the second step is performed. In the second step, we determine the fair values of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including those that may not be currently recorded. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the sum of the fair value of all of those assets and liabilities represents the implied goodwill amount. If the implied fair valuetotal amount of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.allocated to that reporting unit.


We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset group is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset group is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset group.asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield approach,methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.



Guarantee Liabilities


We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. ParticipatingUpon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treated as a single multiple-elementan arrangement with multiple performance obligations when entered into at or near the same time. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.


For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we defer and recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. We assess our guarantee liability at each reporting date to determine if facts and circumstances would indicate the incurrence of an incremental contingent liability is probable and if so, reasonably estimable. The recognition and subsequent adjustments of the contingent guarantee liability as a result of these assessments are recorded as adjustments to revenue. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.


Fair Value Measurements


We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three tierthree-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:


Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.


65

Level 1        Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2        Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3        Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.


The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts receivable from affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value, net of unamortized discount and allowance for credit losses. There were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value, based on quoted market prices or rates for the same or similar instruments, or internal valuation models.


Derivative Financial Instruments


Derivative financial instruments primarily relate to embedded derivatives for certain components of the reset feature of the Senior Reset Notes to affiliates, which are required to be bifurcatedrecognized as either assets or liabilities and are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheetsmeasured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in Interest expense to affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We do not enter intouse derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.


For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as liabilities.

Revenue Recognition (effective January 1, 2018)


We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. We offer our wireless services and devices toOur contracts with customers through bundled arrangements, which may be comprised of multiple contracts entered into with a customer at or near the same time. In recognizing revenue, we assess such agreements as a single bundled arrangement that may involve multiple deliverables,performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and allocated revenuewe allocate the transaction price between each deliverableperformance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

66

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the relative selling pricesexpected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each deliverable oncontract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a standalone basis.significant input to our expected value methodology.



In June 2016, we introduced #GetThanked, which offers eligible customersSales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the following free promotional items as part of their T-Mobile service:

T-Mobile stock - A share of T-Mobile stocksell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to eligible new (through December 31, 2016) or existing (as of June 6, 2016) customers. Shares issued to customers under this promotion are purchased by an independent third-party broker in the open market on behalf of eligible customers. The associated cost, which is paid by T-Mobile, is recordeddealer as a reductionreimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of service revenue for existing customers and as a reductionto recognize from the sales of equipment revenueto indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for new customers in our Consolidated Statementscontracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of Comprehensive Income. Through December 31, 2016, existing eligible customers can also receive a sharegood or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of T-Mobile stock (subject to a maximum of 100 shares in a calendar year) for every new active account they refer, purchased by the third-party broker and paid for by T-Mobile. The cost of shares issued under this refer-a-friend program are included in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income;
impairment may require significant judgment.

Weekly surprise items - Each Tuesday, eligible customers who download the T-Mobile Tuesday app are informed about and can redeem products and services offered by participating business partners. The associated cost is included in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; and

In-flight Wi-Fi - A full hour of in-flight Wi-Fi free to eligible customers on their smartphone on all Gogo-equipped domestic flights. The associated cost, which is paid by T-Mobile, is included in Cost of services in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.


Wireless Services Revenue


We generate our wireless serviceservices revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value added services to customers, such as handset insurance services. Service revenuescontracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid and are recognized when theprepaid. Generally, service is rendered and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenues that are not reasonably assured to be collectible are recorded on a cash basis as payments are received. The recognition of prepaid revenue is deferred untilrecognized as we satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered or the prepaid balance expires. Incentives givenrendered.

Consideration payable to customers are recordeda customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to revenue. We recognize service revenues for Data Stash plans when such services are delivered and the data is consumed, or at time of forfeiture or expiration.  Revenues relating to unused data that is carried over to the following month are deferred and valued based on their relative standalone selling price. Revenue is recorded gross for arrangements involving the resale of third-party services where we are considered the primary obligor and is recorded net of associated costs incurred for services whereby we are not considered the primary obligor.dealers.


Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers.customers and are included in Cost of services. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues and cost of services in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we recorded approximately $409$93 million, $334$161 million and $349$258 million, respectively, of USF and other fees on a gross basis.


We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

Equipment Revenues


We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. Device and accessory sales revenues are generally recognizedFor performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the products aredevice or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We defer a portionhave elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of equipment revenues and costthe related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of equipment sales for expectedassessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.

We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Generally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an EIP with a term of more than one year, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a
67

significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of a performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for that performance obligation will be one year or less.

In addition, for customers who enroll in our JUMP! program, we recognize a liability based on the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See EIP Receivables section“Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.


In addition, for customers enrolled in JUMP!, we separate the JUMP! trade-in right from the multiple element arrangement at its fair value and defer the portion of revenue which represents the fair value of the trade-in right. See Guarantee Liabilities section above for further information. In 2015, we introduced JUMP! On Demand which allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade their leased wireless deviceit for a new onedevice up to three times in a 12 month period. Leasedone time per month. To date, all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease elements and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The residual valueLease revenues on contracts not probable of purchased leased devices is recorded as equipment revenuescollection are limited to the amount of payments received. See “Property and cost of equipment sales. See Property and Equipment sectionEquipment” above for further information.



Contract Balances
Rent Expense

Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.

For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified as separate performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.

A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the identifiable performance obligations.

Contract assets are included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contract Modifications

Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.

Contract Costs

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate officesincur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and dedicated transportation lines, someamortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. asset relates.

We recognize rent expenseamortize deferred costs incurred to obtain service contracts on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably assured at the inception of the lease. We consider several factorsinitial contract and anticipated renewal contracts to which the costs relate, currently 24 months for postpaid service contracts. However, we have elected the practical expedient permitting expensing of costs to obtain a contract when the expected amortization period is one year or less for prepaid service contracts.

Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.

68

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably assured of being exercised, includingour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances withinyear ended December 31, 2017 for more discussion regarding the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.accounting policies that governed revenue recognition prior to January 1, 2018.


Advertising Expense


We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion $1.6and $1.8 billion, and $1.4 billion, respectively.


Income Taxes


Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.


We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance onfor the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.


Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges and available-for-sale securities. This is reported in AOCIAccumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.


Stock-Based Compensation


Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PSUsPRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule.schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.


Earnings Per Share


Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method, and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock in December 2017, potentially dilutive common shares included mandatory convertible preferred stock (“preferred stock”), calculated using the if-converted method. See Note 14 - Earnings Per Share for further information.


Variable Interest Entities


VIEs are entities whichthat lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors whichthat do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE's assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets.


69

The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated.


In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.


Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year


Leases

In MarchFebruary 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock CompensationASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,842), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for shared-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. We elected to adopt this standard effective as of January 1, 2016. The impacts on our consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this standard are as follows:

Consolidated Balance Sheets - A $38 million decrease to the January 1, 2016 Accumulated deficit balance from the recognition, on a modified retrospective basis, of all previously unrecognized income tax attributes related to share-based payments;

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - On a prospective basis, all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to share-based payments will be recognized through Income tax expense. Prior period amounts were not adjusted; and

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - On a prospective basis, as permitted, excess tax benefits related to share-based payments will be presented as operating activities. Prior period amounts were not adjusted.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The standard requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. We adopted this new guidance in the first quarter of 2016 and applied the changes retrospectively. The implementation of this standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The standard requires us to assess our ability to continue as a going concern each interim and annual reporting period and provide certain disclosures if there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, including management’s plan to alleviate the substantial doubt. We adopted this new guidance in the fourth quarter of 2016. The implementation of this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), and has since modified the standard with several ASU’s.

ASUs (collectively, the “new lease standard”). The new lease standard requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes the: identification of the contract; identification of the performance obligations; determination of the transaction price; allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.

The standard becomeswas effective for us, beginningand we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption with the original effective date for periods beginning January 1, 2017 is permitted.  2019.

We plan to adoptadopted the standard when it becomes effective for us beginning January 1, 2018.

The guidance permits two methods ofby recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption the full retrospective method applying the standard to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective methoddate with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. application and as a result did not restate the prior periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The new lease standard also allows entities to apply certainprovides for a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We did not elect the “package of practical expedients” and as a result reassessed under the new lease standard our prior accounting conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We elected to use hindsight for determining the reasonably certain lease term. We did not elect the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as it is not applicable to us.

The new lease standard provides practical expedients and policy elections for an entity’s ongoing accounting. Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements whereby we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption, which includes the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for existing short-term leases at their discretion.transition. We currently anticipate adoptinghave also applied this election to all active leases at transition.

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard usinginclude the modified retrospective methodfollowing:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent, which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent are no longer presented separately.

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change
70

in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a cumulative catch up adjustmentrisk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and providing additional disclosures comparing resultsare excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to previous rules.

We continue to evaluatenew leases in determining the impactexpected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight, our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

71

Including the impacts from a change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites, the cumulative effect of initially applying the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 is as follows:
January 1, 2019
(in millions)Beginning BalanceCumulative Effect AdjustmentBeginning Balance, As Adjusted
Assets
Other current assets$1,676  $(78) $1,598  
Property and equipment, net23,359  (2,339) 21,020  
Operating lease right-of-use assets—  9,251  9,251  
Financing lease right-of-use assets—  2,271  2,271  
Other intangible assets, net198  (12) 186  
Other assets1,623  (71) 1,552  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities7,741  (65) 7,676  
Other current liabilities787  28  815  
Short-term and long-term debt12,965  (2,015) 10,950  
Tower obligations2,557  (345) 2,212  
Deferred tax liabilities4,472  231  4,703  
Deferred rent expense2,781  (2,781) —  
Short-term and long-term operating lease liabilities—  11,364  11,364  
Short-term and long-term financing lease liabilities—  2,016  2,016  
Other long-term liabilities967  (64) 903  
Accumulated deficit(12,954) 653  (12,301) 

Including the impacts from the change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and the change in presentation on the income statement of the 6,200 tower sites for which a sale did not occur, the cumulative effects of initially applying the new lease standard for the year ended December 31, 2019 are estimated as follows:

The aggregate impact is a decrease in Other revenues of $185 million, a decrease in Total operating expenses of $380 million, a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million and an increase to Net income of $175 million.

The impact on our consolidated financial statements but anticipate thisConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows is a decrease in Net cash provided by operating activities of $10 millionand a decrease in Net cash used in financing activities of $10 million.

For arrangements where we are the lessor, including arrangements to lease devices to our service customers, the adoption of the new lease standard willdid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. While westatements as these leases are continuingclassified as operating leases.

Device lease payments are presented as Equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognition of equipment revenue on lease contracts that are determined to assess all potential impactsnot be probable of the standard, we currently believe the most significant impacts may include the following items:

Whether our EIP contracts contain a significant financing component, whichcollection is similarlimited to our current practice of imputing interest, and would similarly impact the amount of revenue recognizedpayments received. We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the consideration in the contract all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from Inventory to Property and equipment, net. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net, are recorded as Inventory and are valued at the timelower of an EIP sale and whethercost or not a portion of the revenue ismarket with any write-down to market recognized as interest rather thanCost of equipment revenue.sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
As we currently expense contract acquisition costs and believe that the requirement to defer incremental contract acquisition costs and recognize them over the term of the initial contract and anticipated renewal contracts to which the costs relate will have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.
Whether bill credits earned over time result in extended service contracts, which would impact the allocation and timing of revenue between service revenue and equipment revenue.
Overall, with the exception of the aforementioned impacts, weWe do not expect that the new standard will result in a substantive change to the method of allocation of contract revenues between various services and equipment, nor to the timing of when revenues are recognizedhave any leasing transactions with related parties. See Note 15 - Leases for most of our service contracts.further information.


We are still in the process of evaluating these impacts, and our initial assessment may change as we continue to refine our systems, process and assumptions.

We are in the process of implementinghave implemented significant new revenuelease accounting systems, processes and internal controls over revenue recognition which will ultimatelylease accounting to assist us in the application of the new lease standard.


In February 2016,

72

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most leases. The income statement recognition is similar to existing lease accounting and isoperating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease classification.  The standard requires lesseespayments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and lessors to classify most leases using principles similar to existing lease accounting, but eliminatesrenewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the “bright line” classification tests.  For lessors,continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the standard modifies the classification criteriatelecommunications industry and the accountingavailability of alternative sites.

We have financing leases for sales-typecertain network equipment. The financing leases do not have renewal options and direct financing leases. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2019 and will require recognizing and measuring leasescontain a bargain purchase option at the beginningend of the earliest period presented usinglease. We recognize a modified retrospective approach. Early adoptionright-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense for our financing leases is permitted. We are currently evaluatingcomprised of the standardamortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the timing of adoption but expect that it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.effective interest method.


Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.Instruments,and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard will become effective for us beginning on January 1, 2020, and will requirerequires a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach).

We will adopt the new credit loss standard on January 1, 2020, and plan to recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures whereas we currently recognize credit losses only when it is probable that they have been incurred. We will also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, excluding consideration of any unamortized discount on those receivables resulting from the imputation of interest. We currently offset our estimate of incurred losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model and are refining the inputs including the forward-looking loss indicators. The estimated impact of the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio as of December 31, 2019, would be an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $85 million to $95 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $22 million to $25 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $63 million to $70 million.

Cloud Computing Arrangements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. We will adopt the standard on a prospective basis beginning on the effective date of January 1, 2020. Upon adoption of the standard, implementation costs are capitalized in the period incurred, which will result in an increase to Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These capitalized amounts will be amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement to Cost of services or Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income based on the nature of the hosting arrangement. The impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements is dependent on the nature and composition of the hosting arrangements entered into subsequent to adoption.

73

Income Taxes

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." The standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted for us as of January 1, 2019.at any time. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and the timing of adoption.

In August 2016,
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement(including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.”  The standard provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows, including beneficial interests in securitization, which would impact the presentation of the deferred purchase price from sales of receivables.  The standard is intended to reduce current diversity in practice.  The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will require a retrospective approach.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statementsCertified Public Accountants, and the timing of adoption. 

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” The standard requires that the income tax impact of intra-entity salesSecurities and transfers of property, except for

inventory, be recognized when the transfer occurs. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will require any deferred taxes not yet recognized on intra-entity transfers to be recorded to retained earnings under a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the standard, but expect that it willExchange Commission (the “SEC”) did not have, or are not expected to have, a materialsignificant impact on our consolidated financial statements.present or future Consolidated Financial Statements.


Note 2 – Business Combinations

Proposed Sprint Transactions

On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement to merge with Sprint in an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock (the “Merger”). The combined company will be named “T-Mobile” and, as a result of the Merger, is expected to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation and increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries. Neither T-Mobile nor Sprint on its own could generate comparable benefits to consumers.

The Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”) have been approved by the boards of directors of T-Mobile and Sprint and the required approvals of the stockholders of each of T-Mobile and Sprint have been obtained. Immediately following the Merger, it is anticipated that Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) and SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) will hold, directly or indirectly, on a fully diluted basis, approximately 41.5% and 27.2%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders, based on closing share prices and certain other assumptions as of December 31, 2019.

In November 2016,connection with the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statemententry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). The funding of the debt facilities provided for in the Commitment Letter is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, including consummation of the Merger. The proceeds of the debt financing provided for in the Commitment Letter will be used to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing working capital needs of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, certain amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the "Consent Solicitation Statement"), we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. There were 0 consent payments accrued as of December 31, 2019.

Under the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, Sprint may be required to reimburse us for 33% of the consent, bank, and other fees we paid or accrued, which totaled $18 million as of December 31, 2019. There were 0 reimbursements accrued as of December 31, 2019. Sprint also obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of Sprint and its subsidiaries. In connection with receiving the requisite consents, Sprint made upfront payments to third-party note holders and related bank fees of $242 million. Under the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, we may also be required to reimburse Sprint for 67% of the upfront consent and related bank fees it paid, which totaled $162 million as of December 31, 2019. There were 0 fees accrued as of December 31, 2019.

74

We recognized Merger-related costs of $620 million and $196 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs generally included consulting and legal fees and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Payments for Merger-related costs were $442 million and $86 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and were recognized within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.”  Flows.

The standard requires entitiesBusiness Combination Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Sprint and us. If we terminate the Business Combination Agreement in connection with a failure to includesatisfy the closing condition related to specified minimum credit ratings for the combined company on the closing date of the Merger (after giving effect to the Merger) from at least two of the three credit rating agencies, then in their cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemedcertain circumstances, we may be required to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The ASU does not define the terms “restricted cash” and “restricted cash equivalents.” The standard will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted.  We are currently evaluating the standard, but expect that it will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.”  The standard eliminates the requirement to measure the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all assets and liabilities within that unit (“the Step 2 test”) from the goodwill impairment test.  Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized inpay Sprint an amount equal to $600 million.

On June 18, 2018, we filed a Public Interest Statement and applications for approval of the Merger with the FCC. On July 18, 2018, the FCC issued a Public Notice formally accepting our applications and establishing a period for public comment. On May 20, 2019, to facilitate the FCC’s review and approval of the FCC license transfers associated with the proposed Merger, we and Sprint filed with the FCC a written ex parte presentation (the “Presentation”) relating to the proposed Merger. The Presentation included proposed commitments from us and Sprint. The FCC approved the Merger on November 5, 2019.

On June 11, 2019, a number of state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against us, DT, Sprint, and SoftBank in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that excess, limited by the amountMerger, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of goodwill inthe Clayton Act and so should be enjoined. After it was filed, several additional states joined the lawsuit. Of the states that reporting unit.  The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2020joined the lawsuit, two have subsequently withdrawn from the suit having resolved their concerns with the Merger. We believe the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, and must be applied to any annual or interim goodwill impairment assessmentshave defended the case vigorously. Trial concluded after that date.  Early adoption is permitted.two weeks of witness testimony and presentation of document evidence. We are now waiting for the trial court’s ruling. On November 25, 2019, individual consumers filed a similar lawsuit in the Northern District of California. That case has been stayed pending the outcome of the New York litigation.

On July 26, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Sprint and DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”). We and Sprint are collectively referred to as the “Sellers.” Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH will acquire Sprint’s prepaid wireless business, currently evaluatingoperated under the standard, but expect that itBoost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shenandoah Telecommunications Company and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), including customer accounts, inventory, contracts, intellectual property and certain other specified assets (the “Prepaid Business”), and will notassume certain related liabilities (the “Prepaid Transaction”). DISH will pay the Sellers $1.4 billion for the Prepaid Business, subject to a working capital adjustment. The consummation of the Prepaid Transaction is subject to the consummation of the Merger and other customary closing conditions.

At the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, the Sellers and DISH will enter into (i) a License Purchase Agreement pursuant to which (a) the Sellers will sell certain 800 MHz spectrum licenses held by Sprint to DISH for a total of approximately $3.6 billion in a transaction to be completed, subject to certain additional closing conditions, following an application for FCC approval to be filed three years following the closing of the Merger and (b) the Sellers will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Equipment Installment Plan Receivables

We offer certain retail customers the option to paylease back from DISH, as needed, a portion of the spectrum sold for their devices and accessoriesan additional two years following the closing of the spectrum sale transaction, (ii) a Transition Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of transition services to DISH in installments overconnection with the Prepaid Business for a period of up to 24 months usingthree years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, (iii) a Master Network Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of network services to customers of the Prepaid Business for a period of up to seven years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, and (iv) an EIP.Option to Acquire Tower and Retail Assets offering DISH the option to acquire certain decommissioned towers and retail locations from the Sellers, subject to obtaining all necessary third-party consents, for a period of up to five years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction.


On July 26, 2019, in connection with the entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement, we and the other parties to the Business Combination Agreement entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Business Combination Agreement. The following table summarizesAmendment extended the EIP receivables:Outside Date (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) to November 1, 2019, or, if the Marketing Period (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) had started and was in effect at such date, then January 2, 2020. Because the Transactions were not completed by the Outside Date, each of T-Mobile and Sprint currently has the right to terminate the Business Combination Agreement or the terms may be amended.

On July 26, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) filed a complaint and a proposed final judgment (the “Proposed Consent Decree”) agreed to by us, DT, Sprint, SoftBank and DISH with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
75

(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
EIP receivables, gross$3,230
 $3,558
Unamortized imputed discount(195) (185)
EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount3,035
 3,373
Allowance for credit losses(121) (148)
EIP receivables, net$2,914
 $3,225

   
Classified on the balance sheet as:   
Equipment installment plan receivables, net$1,930
 $2,378
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net984
 847
EIP receivables, net$2,914
 $3,225
The Proposed Consent Decree would fully resolve DOJ’s investigation into the Merger and would require the parties to, among other things, carry out the divestitures to be made pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement described above upon closing of the Merger. The Proposed Consent Decree is subject to judicial approval.

The consummation of the Merger remains subject to certain closing conditions. We use a proprietary credit scoring model that measuresexpect the credit qualityMerger will be permitted to close in early 2020.

Note 3 – Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Our portfolio of a customer at the timereceivables is comprised of application for mobile communications2 portfolio segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables. Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service plan characteristics. leased device receivables, other carriers and third-party retail channels.

Based upon customer credit profiles, we classify the EIP receivables segment into the credit categories2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower delinquency risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher delinquency risk. Subprime customersCustomers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.


EIP receivables for which invoices have not yet been generated forTo determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer are classifiedusing several factors, such as Unbilled. EIP receivables for which invoices have been generated but which are not past the contractual due date are classified as Billed – Current. EIP receivables for which invoices have been generatedcredit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and the payment is past the contractual due date are classified as Billed – Past Due.service and device plan characteristics.



The balance and aging offollowing table summarizes the EIP receivables, on a gross basis byincluding imputed discounts and related allowance for credit category were as follows:losses:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
EIP receivables, gross$4,582  $4,534  
Unamortized imputed discount(299) (330) 
EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount4,283  4,204  
Allowance for credit losses(100) (119) 
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Equipment installment plan receivables, net$2,600  $2,538  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions)Prime Subprime Total Prime Subprime Total
Unbilled$1,343
 $1,686
 $3,029
 $1,593
 $1,698
 $3,291
Billed – Current51
 77
 128
 77
 91
 168
Billed – Past Due25
 48
 73
 37
 62
 99
EIP receivables, gross$1,419
 $1,811
 $3,230
 $1,707
 $1,851
 $3,558


The increase in subprime EIP receivables as a percentageTo determine the appropriate level of total EIP receivables is primarily due to the EIP sale arrangement funding increase during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 in the unamortized imputed discount and allowance for credit losses, we consider a number of credit quality factors, including historical credit losses and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, aging of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions.

We write off account balances forif collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.

For EIP receivables, was as follows:subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated incurred losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Imputed discount and allowance for credit losses, beginning of year$333
 $448
Bad debt expense250
 365
Write-offs, net of recoveries(277) (333)
Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables186
 (84)
Impacts from sales of EIP receivables(176) (63)
Imputed discount and allowance for credit losses, end of year$316
 $333


The EIP receivables had weighted average effective imputed interest rates of 9.0%8.8% and 8.8%10.0% as of December 31, 20162019, and 2015,2018, respectively.


76

Activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivables segments were as follows:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
(in millions)Accounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotal
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period$67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  $102  $316  $418  
Bad debt expense77  230  307  69  228  297  104  284  388  
Write-offs, net of recoveries(83) (249) (332) (88) (240) (328) (120) (273) (393) 
Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivablesN/A  136  136  N/A  250  250  N/A  252  252  
Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivablesN/A  (167) (167) N/A  (185) (185) N/A  (183) (183) 
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period$61  $399  $460  $67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  

Management considers the aging of receivables to be an important credit indicator. The following table provides delinquency status for the unpaid principal balance for receivables within the EIP portfolio segment, which we actively monitor as part of our current credit risk management practices and policies:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)PrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, grossPrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, gross
Current - 30 days past due$2,384  $2,108  $4,492  $1,987  $2,446  $4,433  
31 - 60 days past due13  28  41  15  32  47  
61 - 90 days past due 17  24   19  25  
More than 90 days past due 18  25   22  29  
Total receivables, gross$2,411  $2,171  $4,582  $2,015  $2,519  $4,534  

Note 34 – Sales of Certain Receivables


We have entered into transactions to sell certain service and EIP accounts receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, are described below.


Sales of Service ReceivablesAccounts Receivable


Overview of the Transaction


In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivablesreceivable on a revolving basis with a maximum funding commitment of $750 million (the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement is $950 million. In November 2016,February 2019, the service receivable sale arrangement was amended to increaseextend the maximum funding commitment to $950 million with a scheduled expiration date, inas well as certain third-party credit support under the arrangement, to March 2018.2021. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $907$924 million and $750$774 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.


In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivablesreceivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”),VIE, and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.


77

Variable Interest Entity


We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entitiesentity and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we

are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not consolidated intoincluded in our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consists primarily of the deferred purchase price and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$350  $339  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities25  59  
Other current liabilities342  149  
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Other current assets$207
 $206
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities17
 
Other current liabilities129
 73


Sales of EIP Receivables


Overview of the Transaction


In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivablesreceivable on a revolving basis with a maximum funding commitment of $800 million (the “EIP sale arrangement”). In June 2016,The maximum funding commitment of the EIP sale arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment tois $1.3 billion, with aand the scheduled expiration date inis November 2017. 2020.

As of both December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.2 billion and $800 million, respectively.$1.3 billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of customer EIP balances, which require monthly customer payments for up to 24 months.


In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly-owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity for which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.


Variable Interest Entity


We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in the EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to the EIP BRE. Accordingly, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary, and include the balances and results of operations of the EIP BRE in our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, (primarilywhich consists primarily of the deferred purchase price)price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to the EIP BRE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$344  $321  
Other assets89  88  
Other long-term liabilities18  22  

78

(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Other current assets$371
 $164
Other assets83
 44
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 14
Other long-term liabilities4
 3

In addition, the EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of the EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in the EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of the EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.



Sales of ReceivablesOther Intangible Assets


Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists are amortized using the sum-of-the-years'-digits method over the expected period in which the relationship is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The transfers of service receivablesremaining finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.

Goodwill and EIP receivables to the non-consolidated entities are accounted for as sales of financial assets. Once identified for sale, the receivable is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Upon sale, we derecognize the net carrying amountIndefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill consists of the receivables. We recognize the net cash proceeds in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The proceeds are netexcess of the deferred purchase price consisting of a receivable fromover the purchasers that entitles us to certain collections on the receivables. We recognize the collection of the deferred purchase price in Net cash provided by operating activities as it is dependent on collection of the customer receivables and is not subject to significant interest rate risk. The deferred purchase price represents a financial asset that is primarily tied to the creditworthiness of the customers and which can be settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment, due to default by the customers on the underlying receivables. We elected, at inception, to measure the deferred purchase price at fair value with changes in fair value included in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.

Spectrum Licenses

Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the deferred purchase price is determined based on a discounted cash flow modelspectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which uses primarily unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), including customer default rates. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, our deferred purchase price related to the sales of service receivables and EIP receivables was $659 million and $389 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the impacts of the sale of certain service receivables and EIP receivables in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Derecognized net service receivables and EIP receivables$2,502
 $1,850
Other current assets578
 370
of which, deferred purchase price576
 345
Other long-term assets83
 44
of which, deferred purchase price83
 44
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities17
 14
Other current liabilities129
 73
Other long-term liabilities4
 3
Net cash proceeds since inception2,030
 1,494
Of which:   
Net cash proceeds during the year-to-date period536
 884
Net cash proceeds funded by reinvested collections1,494
 610

We recognized losses from sales of receivables of $228 million, $204 million and $179 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These losses from sales of receivables were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Losses from sales of receivables include adjustments to the receivables’ fair values and changes in fair value of the deferred purchase price.

Continuing Involvement

Pursuant to the sale arrangements described above, we have continuing involvementprovide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service receivables and EIP receivables we sell as we service the receivables andareas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are required to repurchase certain receivables, including ineligible receivables, aged receivables and receivables where write-off is imminent. We continue to service the customers and their related receivables, including facilitating customer payment collection, in exchangeissued for a monthly servicing fee. Asfixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen years, the receivables are sold onFCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a revolving basis, the customer payment collections on sold receivables maynominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be reinvested in new receivable sales. While servicing the receivables, we apply the same policies and proceduresable to the sold receivables as we applymeet all requirements necessary to our owned receivables, and we continue to maintain normal relationships with our customers. Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, under certain circumstances, we are required to deposit cash or replacement EIP receivables primarily for contracts terminated by customers under our JUMP! Program.

In addition, we have continuing involvement with the sold receivables as we may be responsible for absorbing additional credit losses pursuant to the sale arrangements. Our maximum exposure to loss related to the involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables sold under the sale arrangements was $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2016. The maximum exposure to loss, which is a required disclosure under GAAP, represents an estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances whereby we would not receive the deferred purchase price portion of the contractual proceeds

withheld by the purchasers and would also be required to repurchase the maximum amount of receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements without consideration for any recovery.  As we believe the probability of these circumstances occurring is remote, the maximum exposure to loss is not an indicationsecure renewal of our expected loss.

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

The components of property and equipment were as follows:
(in millions)Useful Lives December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Buildings and equipmentUp to 40 years $1,657
 $1,900
Wireless communications systemsUp to 20 years 29,272
 27,063
Leasehold improvementsUp to 12 years 1,068
 1,003
Capitalized softwareUp to 7 years 8,488
 8,524
Leased wireless devicesUp to 18 months 2,624
 2,236
Construction in progress  2,613
 2,466
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (24,779) (23,192)
Property and equipment, net  $20,943
 $20,000

Wireless communication systems include capital lease agreements for network equipment with varying expiration terms through 2030. Capital lease assets and accumulated amortization were $1.6 billion and $300 million, and $839 million and $117 million, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We capitalize interest associated withspectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. We recognized capitalized interest of $142 million, $230 million and $81 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The components of leased wireless devices under our JUMP! On Demand program were as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Leased wireless devices, gross$2,624
 $2,236
Accumulated depreciation(1,193) (263)
Leased wireless devices, net$1,431
 $1,973

Future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Year Ending December 31, 
2017$710
201892
Total$802

Depreciation expense relating to property and equipment was $6.0 billion, $4.4 billion and $4.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 included $1.5 billion and $312 million, respectively, related to leased wireless devices.

For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recorded additional depreciation expense of $101 million, $85 million and $242 million, respectively, as a result of adjustments to useful lives of network equipment expectedour spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.

64

At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment and transferred at their carrying value, net of any impairment, to assets held for sale included in connection with our network transformation and decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network and redundant network cell sites.

Asset retirement obligations are primarily for certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrativeOther current assets are located.

Activity in our asset retirement obligations was as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of year$483
 $390
Liabilities incurred50
 19
Liabilities settled(67) (130)
Accretion expense24
 17
Changes in estimated cash flows49
 187
Asset retirement obligations, end of year$539
 $483
    
Classified on the balance sheet as:   
Other current liabilities$16
 $41
Other long-term liabilities523
 442
Asset retirement obligations$539
 $483

The corresponding assets, netConsolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of accumulated depreciation, related to asset retirement obligations were $258 million and $241 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we settled asset retirement obligations in connection with the decommissioning of certain cell sites. Due to new information gained throughout 2015, primarily from decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network cell sites, we reassessed the expected cash flows related to its asset retirement obligations for all remaining T-Mobile network cell sites.  As a result, we recorded asset retirement obligations and corresponding assets in the fourth quarter of 2015 to reflect the change in estimated cash flows.

Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

There were no changes in carrying values of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Spectrum Licenses

The following table summarizes our spectrum license activity:
(in millions)December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Spectrum licenses, beginning of year$23,955
 $21,955
Spectrum license acquisitions3,334
 2,615
Spectrum licenses transferred to held for sale(324) (727)
Costs to clear spectrum49
 112
Spectrum licenses, end of year$27,014
 $23,955

We had the following spectrum license transactions during 2016:

We closed on the agreement with AT&T Inc. for the acquisition and exchange of certain spectrum licenses.or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, duringspectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valued at fair value and the first quarterdifference between the fair value of 2016, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fairobtained, book value of approximately $1.2 billionthe spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain of $636 millionand included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the book value of the assets transferred or exchanged.


Impairment

We closed on agreements with multiple third parties forassess the purchasecarrying value of our goodwill and exchange of certainother indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for $1.3 billionpotential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in cash.  Upon closingcircumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the transactions,2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we recordedperform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

Guarantee Liabilities

We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treated as an arrangement with multiple performance obligations when entered into at or near the same time. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.

For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.

Fair Value Measurements

We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:


65

Level 1        Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2        Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3        Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts receivable from affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value, net of unamortized discount and allowance for credit losses. There were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value, based on quoted market prices or rates for the same or similar instruments, or internal valuation models.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as liabilities.

Revenue Recognition (effective January 1, 2018)

We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

66

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated fair values totaling approximately $1.7 billioncredit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.

Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized gainsas well as assessing the indicators of $199 millionimpairment may require significant judgment.

Wireless Services Revenue

We generate our wireless services revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value added services to customers, such as handset insurance services. Service contracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid. Generally, service revenue is recognized as we satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered.

Consideration payable to a customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to dealers.

Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers and are included in Gains on disposalCost of spectrum licensesservices. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded approximately $93 million, $161 million and $258 million, respectively, of USF fees on a gross basis.


We closedhave made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

Equipment Revenues

We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. For performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the device or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We have elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of assessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.

We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Generally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an agreementEIP with a third partyterm of more than one year, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a
67

significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of certain spectrum licenses covering approximately 11 million peoplea performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for approximately $420 million duringthat performance obligation will be one year or less.

In addition, for customers who enroll in our JUMP! program, we recognize a liability based on the fourth quarterestimated fair value of 2016.the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See “Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.



We entered into an agreement withJUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a third partydevice over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. To date, all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease elements and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the exchangerelative standalone selling price of certain spectrum licenses, which is expected to closeeach performance obligation in the first halfcontract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease revenues on contracts not probable of 2017. Our spectrum licensescollection are limited to be transferredthe amount of payments received. See “Property and Equipment” above for further information.

Contract Balances

Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.

For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified as partseparate performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.

A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the exchange transaction were reclassified asidentifiable performance obligations.

Contract assets held for sale and wereare included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance SheetsSheets.

Contract Modifications

Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.

Contract Costs

We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and amortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates.

We amortize deferred costs incurred to obtain service contracts on a straight-line basis over the term of the initial contract and anticipated renewal contracts to which the costs relate, currently 24 months for postpaid service contracts. However, we have elected the practical expedient permitting expensing of costs to obtain a contract when the expected amortization period is one year or less for prepaid service contracts.

Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.

68

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for more discussion regarding the accounting policies that governed revenue recognition prior to January 1, 2018.

Advertising Expense

We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges and available-for-sale securities. This is reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at their carryingfair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of $86stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method, and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock in December 2017, potentially dilutive common shares included mandatory convertible preferred stock calculated using the if-converted method. See Note 14 - Earnings Per Share for further information.

Variable Interest Entities

VIEs are entities that lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE's assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets.

69

The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated.

In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new lease standard”). The new lease standard was effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2019.

We adopted the standard by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application and as a result did not restate the prior periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The new lease standard provides for a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We did not elect the “package of practical expedients” and as a result reassessed under the new lease standard our prior accounting conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We elected to use hindsight for determining the reasonably certain lease term. We did not elect the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as it is not applicable to us.

The new lease standard provides practical expedients and policy elections for an entity’s ongoing accounting. Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements whereby we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption, which includes the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for existing short-term leases at transition. We have also applied this election to all active leases at transition.

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent, which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent are no longer presented separately.

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change
70

in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to new leases in determining the expected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight, our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

71

Including the impacts from a change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites, the cumulative effect of initially applying the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 is as follows:
January 1, 2019
(in millions)Beginning BalanceCumulative Effect AdjustmentBeginning Balance, As Adjusted
Assets
Other current assets$1,676  $(78) $1,598  
Property and equipment, net23,359  (2,339) 21,020  
Operating lease right-of-use assets—  9,251  9,251  
Financing lease right-of-use assets—  2,271  2,271  
Other intangible assets, net198  (12) 186  
Other assets1,623  (71) 1,552  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities7,741  (65) 7,676  
Other current liabilities787  28  815  
Short-term and long-term debt12,965  (2,015) 10,950  
Tower obligations2,557  (345) 2,212  
Deferred tax liabilities4,472  231  4,703  
Deferred rent expense2,781  (2,781) —  
Short-term and long-term operating lease liabilities—  11,364  11,364  
Short-term and long-term financing lease liabilities—  2,016  2,016  
Other long-term liabilities967  (64) 903  
Accumulated deficit(12,954) 653  (12,301) 

Including the impacts from the change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and the change in presentation on the income statement of the 6,200 tower sites for which a sale did not occur, the cumulative effects of initially applying the new lease standard for the year ended December 31, 2019 are estimated as follows:

The aggregate impact is a decrease in Other revenues of $185 million, a decrease in Total operating expenses of $380 million, a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million and an increase to Net income of $175 million.

The impact on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is a decrease in Net cash provided by operating activities of $10 millionand a decrease in Net cash used in financing activities of $10 million.

For arrangements where we are the lessor, including arrangements to lease devices to our service customers, the adoption of the new lease standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements as these leases are classified as operating leases.

Device lease payments are presented as Equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognition of equipment revenue on lease contracts that are determined to not be probable of collection is limited to the amount of payments received. We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the consideration in the contract all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from Inventory to Property and equipment, net. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net, are recorded as Inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or market with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

We do not have any leasing transactions with related parties. See Note 15 - Leases for further information.

We have implemented significant new lease accounting systems, processes and internal controls over lease accounting to assist us in the application of the new lease standard.



72

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.

We have financing leases for certain network equipment. The financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense for our financing leases is comprised of the amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the effective interest method.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard will become effective for us beginning on January 1, 2020, and requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach).

We will adopt the new credit loss standard on January 1, 2020, and plan to recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures whereas we currently recognize credit losses only when it is probable that they have been incurred. We will also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, excluding consideration of any unamortized discount on those receivables resulting from the imputation of interest. We currently offset our estimate of incurred losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model and are refining the inputs including the forward-looking loss indicators. The estimated impact of the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio as of December 31, 2019, would be an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $85 million to $95 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $22 million to $25 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $63 million to $70 million.

Cloud Computing Arrangements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. We will adopt the standard on a prospective basis beginning on the effective date of January 1, 2020. Upon adoption of the standard, implementation costs are capitalized in the period incurred, which will result in an increase to Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These capitalized amounts will be amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement to Cost of services or Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income based on the nature of the hosting arrangement. The impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements is dependent on the nature and composition of the hosting arrangements entered into subsequent to adoption.

73

Income Taxes

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." The standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted for us at any time. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and the timing of adoption.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) did not have, or are not expected to have, a significant impact on our present or future Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2 – Business Combinations

Proposed Sprint Transactions

On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement to merge with Sprint in an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock (the “Merger”). The combined company will be named “T-Mobile” and, as a result of the Merger, is expected to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation and increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries. Neither T-Mobile nor Sprint on its own could generate comparable benefits to consumers.

The Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”) have been approved by the boards of directors of T-Mobile and Sprint and the required approvals of the stockholders of each of T-Mobile and Sprint have been obtained. Immediately following the Merger, it is anticipated that Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) and SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) will hold, directly or indirectly, on a fully diluted basis, approximately 41.5% and 27.2%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders, based on closing share prices and certain other assumptions as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). The funding of the debt facilities provided for in the Commitment Letter is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, including consummation of the Merger. The proceeds of the debt financing provided for in the Commitment Letter will be used to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing working capital needs of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, certain amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the "Consent Solicitation Statement"), we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. There were 0 consent payments accrued as of December 31, 2019.

Under the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, Sprint may be required to reimburse us for 33% of the consent, bank, and other fees we paid or accrued, which totaled $18 million as of December 31, 2016.

We had2019. There were 0 reimbursements accrued as of December 31, 2019. Sprint also obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of Sprint and its subsidiaries. In connection with receiving the following spectrum license transactions during 2015:

Upon conclusionrequisite consents, Sprint made upfront payments to third-party note holders and related bank fees of $242 million. Under the terms of the 2014 Advanced Wireless Services (“AWS”) auction,Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, we were awarded AWS spectrum licenses covering approximately 97 million peoplemay also be required to reimburse Sprint for an aggregate bid price of approximately $1.8 billion.

We closed on the agreement with Verizon Communications Inc. for the exchange of certain spectrum licenses. Upon closing67% of the transaction, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of $311 millionupfront consent and recognized a non-cash gain of $139 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

We closed on agreements with multiple third parties for the purchase and exchange of certain spectrum licenses for $459 million in cash.  Upon closing of the transactions, we recorded spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair values totaling approximately $530 million and recognized gains of $24 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

We entered into multiple agreements with third parties for the exchange of certain spectrum licenses. Our spectrum licenses to be transferred as part of the exchange transaction were reclassified as assets held for sale and were included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at their carrying value of $554related bank fees it paid, which totaled $162 million as of December 31, 2015.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Impairment Assessments

Our impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets (spectrum licenses) resulted in no impairment2019. There were 0 fees accrued as of December 31, 20162019.

74

We recognized Merger-related costs of $620 million and 2015.$196 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs generally included consulting and legal fees and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Payments for Merger-related costs were $442 million and $86 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and were recognized within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.


The Business Combination Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Sprint and us. If we terminate the Business Combination Agreement in connection with a failure to satisfy the closing condition related to specified minimum credit ratings for the combined company on the closing date of the Merger (after giving effect to the Merger) from at least two of the three credit rating agencies, then in certain circumstances, we may be required to pay Sprint an amount equal to $600 million.

On June 18, 2018, we filed a Public Interest Statement and applications for approval of the Merger with the FCC. On July 18, 2018, the FCC issued a Public Notice formally accepting our applications and establishing a period for public comment. On May 20, 2019, to facilitate the FCC’s review and approval of the FCC license transfers associated with the proposed Merger, we and Sprint filed with the FCC a written ex parte presentation (the “Presentation”) relating to the proposed Merger. The Presentation included proposed commitments from us and Sprint. The FCC approved the Merger on November 5, 2019.

On June 11, 2019, a number of state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against us, DT, Sprint, and SoftBank in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Merger, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and so should be enjoined. After it was filed, several additional states joined the lawsuit. Of the states that joined the lawsuit, two have subsequently withdrawn from the suit having resolved their concerns with the Merger. We believe the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, and have defended the case vigorously. Trial concluded after two weeks of witness testimony and presentation of document evidence. We are now waiting for the trial court’s ruling. On November 25, 2019, individual consumers filed a similar lawsuit in the Northern District of California. That case has been stayed pending the outcome of the New York litigation.

On July 26, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Sprint and DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”). We and Sprint are collectively referred to as the “Sellers.” Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH will acquire Sprint’s prepaid wireless business, currently operated under the Boost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shenandoah Telecommunications Company and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), including customer accounts, inventory, contracts, intellectual property and certain other specified assets (the “Prepaid Business”), and will assume certain related liabilities (the “Prepaid Transaction”). DISH will pay the Sellers $1.4 billion for the Prepaid Business, subject to a working capital adjustment. The consummation of the Prepaid Transaction is subject to the consummation of the Merger and other customary closing conditions.

At the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, the Sellers and DISH will enter into (i) a License Purchase Agreement pursuant to which (a) the Sellers will sell certain 800 MHz spectrum licenses held by Sprint to DISH for a total of approximately $3.6 billion in a transaction to be completed, subject to certain additional closing conditions, following an application for FCC approval to be filed three years following the closing of the Merger and (b) the Sellers will have the option to lease back from DISH, as needed, a portion of the spectrum sold for an additional two years following the closing of the spectrum sale transaction, (ii) a Transition Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of transition services to DISH in connection with the Prepaid Business for a period of up to three years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, (iii) a Master Network Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of network services to customers of the Prepaid Business for a period of up to seven years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, and (iv) an Option to Acquire Tower and Retail Assets offering DISH the option to acquire certain decommissioned towers and retail locations from the Sellers, subject to obtaining all necessary third-party consents, for a period of up to five years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction.

On July 26, 2019, in connection with the entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement, we and the other parties to the Business Combination Agreement entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Business Combination Agreement. The Amendment extended the Outside Date (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) to November 1, 2019, or, if the Marketing Period (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) had started and was in effect at such date, then January 2, 2020. Because the Transactions were not completed by the Outside Date, each of T-Mobile and Sprint currently has the right to terminate the Business Combination Agreement or the terms may be amended.

On July 26, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) filed a complaint and a proposed final judgment (the “Proposed Consent Decree”) agreed to by us, DT, Sprint, SoftBank and DISH with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
75

The Proposed Consent Decree would fully resolve DOJ’s investigation into the Merger and would require the parties to, among other things, carry out the divestitures to be made pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement described above upon closing of the Merger. The Proposed Consent Decree is subject to judicial approval.

The consummation of the Merger remains subject to certain closing conditions. We expect the Merger will be permitted to close in early 2020.

Note 3 – Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Our portfolio of receivables is comprised of 2 portfolio segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables. Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service and leased device receivables, other carriers and third-party retail channels.

Based upon customer credit profiles, we classify the EIP receivables segment into 2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower delinquency risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher delinquency risk. Customers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.

To determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service and device plan characteristics.

The following table summarizes the EIP receivables, including imputed discounts and related allowance for credit losses:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
EIP receivables, gross$4,582  $4,534  
Unamortized imputed discount(299) (330) 
EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount4,283  4,204  
Allowance for credit losses(100) (119) 
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Equipment installment plan receivables, net$2,600  $2,538  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  

To determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, we consider a number of credit quality factors, including historical credit losses and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, aging of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions.

We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.

For EIP receivables, subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated incurred losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

The EIP receivables had weighted average effective imputed interest rates of 8.8% and 10.0% as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

76

Activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivables segments were as follows:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
(in millions)Accounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotal
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period$67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  $102  $316  $418  
Bad debt expense77  230  307  69  228  297  104  284  388  
Write-offs, net of recoveries(83) (249) (332) (88) (240) (328) (120) (273) (393) 
Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivablesN/A  136  136  N/A  250  250  N/A  252  252  
Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivablesN/A  (167) (167) N/A  (185) (185) N/A  (183) (183) 
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period$61  $399  $460  $67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  

Management considers the aging of receivables to be an important credit indicator. The following table provides delinquency status for the unpaid principal balance for receivables within the EIP portfolio segment, which we actively monitor as part of our current credit risk management practices and policies:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)PrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, grossPrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, gross
Current - 30 days past due$2,384  $2,108  $4,492  $1,987  $2,446  $4,433  
31 - 60 days past due13  28  41  15  32  47  
61 - 90 days past due 17  24   19  25  
More than 90 days past due 18  25   22  29  
Total receivables, gross$2,411  $2,171  $4,582  $2,015  $2,519  $4,534  

Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables

We have entered into transactions to sell certain service and EIP receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our Consolidated Financial Statements, are described below.

Sales of Service Accounts Receivable

Overview of the Transaction

In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement is $950 million. In February 2019, the service receivable sale arrangement was amended to extend the scheduled expiration date, as well as certain third-party credit support under the arrangement, to March 2021. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $924 million and $774 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.

In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a VIE, and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.

77

Variable Interest Entity

We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entity and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consists primarily of the deferred purchase price and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$350  $339  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities25  59  
Other current liabilities342  149  

Sales of EIP Receivables

Overview of the Transaction

In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “EIP sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the EIP sale arrangement is $1.3 billion, and the scheduled expiration date is November 2020.

As of both December 31, 2019 and 2018, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.3 billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis.

In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly-owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity for which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.

Variable Interest Entity

We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in the EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to the EIP BRE. Accordingly, we include the balances and results of operations of the EIP BRE in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consists primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to the EIP BRE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$344  $321  
Other assets89  88  
Other long-term liabilities18  22  

78

In addition, the EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of the EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in the EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of the EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.

Other Intangible Assets


Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists are amortized using the sum-of-the-years'-digits method over the expected period in which the relationship is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The components ofremaining finite-lived intangible assets were as follows:are amortized using the straight-line method.

 Useful Lives December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) Gross
Amount
 Accumulated Amortization Net
Amount
 Gross
Amount
 Accumulated Amortization Net
Amount
Customer listsUp to 6 years $1,104
 $(894) $210
 $1,104
 $(719) $385
Trademarks and patentsUp to 12 years 303
 (156) 147
 300
 (115) 185
OtherUp to 28 years 50
 (31) 19
 51
 (27) 24
Other intangible assets  $1,457
 $(1,081) $376
 $1,455
 $(861) $594
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets


Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $220 million, $276 million and $333 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.Goodwill


The estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization are summarized below:
(in millions)Estimated Future Amortization
Year Ending December 31, 
2017$163
2018104
201952
202034
202114
Thereafter9
Total$376


Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Embedded Derivative Instruments

In connection with the business combination with MetroPCS, we issued senior reset notes to Deutsche Telekom. The interest rates were adjusted at the reset dates to rates defined in the applicable supplemental indentures to manage interest rate risk related to the senior reset notes. We determined certain componentsGoodwill consists of the reset feature are required to be bifurcated fromexcess of the senior reset notes and separately accounted for as embedded derivative instruments. As of December 31, 2015, one embedded derivative related topurchase price over the 5.950% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023 was subject to interest rate volatility. In April 2016, the interest rate related to the 5.950% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023 was adjusted from 5.950% to 9.332%. See Note 7 – Debt for further information. As of December 31, 2016, there were no embedded derivatives subject to interest rate volatility related to the Senior Reset Notes to affiliates.

The fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our embedded derivatives was2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.

Spectrum Licenses

Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined using a lattice-based valuation model by determiningthere are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.

64

At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment and transferred at their carrying value, net of any impairment, to assets held for sale included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valued at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the senior reset notes withspectrum licenses obtained, book value of the spectrum licenses transferred and withoutcash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain and included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the embedded derivatives included. Thetransaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the book value of the assets transferred or exchanged.

Impairment

We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.

When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the senior reset notes2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the embedded derivatives utilizes the contractual term of each senior reset note, reset rates calculated based on the spread between specified yield curves and the yield curve on certain T-Mobile long-term debt adjusted pursuantoverall business at a national level. We may elect to the applicable supplemental indentures and interest rate volatility. Interest rate volatility isfirst perform a significant unobservable input (Level 3) asqualitative assessment to determine whether it is derived based on weighted risk-free rate volatility and credit spread volatility. Significant increasesmore likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or decreases inif the weighting of risk-free volatility and credit spread volatility, in isolation, would result in a higher or lowerqualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the embedded derivatives. The embedded derivatives were classified as Level 3 inintangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of embedded derivative instruments by balance sheet location and level were as follows:
 December 31, 2016
(in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Other long-term liabilities$
 $
 $118
 $118

 December 31, 2015
(in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Other long-term liabilities$
 $
 $143
 $143

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) activity related to embedded derivatives instruments recognized in Interest expense to affiliates:
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Embedded derivatives$25
 $(148) $18

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The carrying amounts and fair values of our short-term investments and long-term debt included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
 Level within the Fair Value Hierarchy December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in millions) Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
Assets:         
Short-term investments1 $
 $
 $2,998
 $2,998
Deferred purchase price assets3 659
 659
 389
 389
Liabilities:         
Senior Notes to third parties1 $18,600
 $19,584
 $17,600
 $18,098
Senior Reset Notes to affiliates2 5,600
 5,955
 5,600
 6,072
Senior Secured Term Loans2 1,980
 2,005
 2,000
 1,990
Guarantee Liabilities3 135
 135
 163
 163


Short-term Investments

The fair value of our short-term investments as of December 31, 2015, which consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. We did not have any short-term investments as of December 31, 2016.

Long-term Debt

The fair value of our Senior Notes to third parties was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Theestimated fair value of the Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates was determined based on a discounted cash flow approach using quoted prices of instruments with similar terms and maturities and an estimate for our standalone credit risk. Accordingly, our Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Although we have determinedintangible asset. If the estimated fair values using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment was required in interpreting market data to developvalue of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value estimates forusing the Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates. The fair value estimates wereGreenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on information available as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. As such, our estimates are not necessarily indicative ofdiscounted cash flows associated with the amount we could realize in aintangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market exchange.conditions.


Deferred Purchase Price Assets

In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates. See Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables.

Guarantee Liabilities


OurWe offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treated as an arrangement with multiple performance obligations when entered into at or near the same time. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.

For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liabilities wereliability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, period, volumesand the probability and timing of trade-in,trade-in. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of handsets tradedthe returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.

Fair Value Measurements

We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:


65

Level 1        Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2        Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3        Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts receivable from affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value, net of unamortized discount and allowance for credit losses. There were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value, based on quoted market prices or rates for the same or similar instruments, or internal valuation models.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as liabilities.

Revenue Recognition (effective January 1, 2018)

We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.

Significant Judgments

The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:

Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.

The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.

Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.

66

For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses”, above, for more discussion on how we assess credit risk.

Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.

Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.

The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.

For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment.

Wireless Services Revenue

We generate our wireless services revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value added services to customers, such as handset insurance services. Service contracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid. Generally, service revenue is recognized as we satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered.

Consideration payable to a customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to dealers.

Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers and are included in Cost of services. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded approximately $93 million, $161 million and $258 million, respectively, of USF fees on a gross basis.

We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

Equipment Revenues

We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. For performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the device or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We have elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of assessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.

We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Generally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an EIP with a term of more than one year, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a
67

significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of a performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for that performance obligation will be one year or less.

In addition, for customers who enroll in our JUMP! program, we recognize a liability based on the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See “Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.

JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. To date, all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease elements and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease revenues on contracts not probable of collection are limited to the amount of payments received. See “Property and Equipment” above for further information.

Contract Balances

Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.

For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified as separate performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.

A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the identifiable performance obligations.

Contract assets are included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contract Modifications

Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.

Contract Costs

We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and amortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates.

We amortize deferred costs incurred to obtain service contracts on a straight-line basis over the term of the initial contract and anticipated renewal contracts to which the costs relate, currently 24 months for postpaid service contracts. However, we have elected the practical expedient permitting expensing of costs to obtain a contract when the expected amortization period is one year or less for prepaid service contracts.

Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.

68

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for more discussion regarding the accounting policies that governed revenue recognition prior to January 1, 2018.

Advertising Expense

We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges and available-for-sale securities. This is reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method, and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock in December 2017, potentially dilutive common shares included mandatory convertible preferred stock calculated using the if-converted method. See Note 14 - Earnings Per Share for further information.

Variable Interest Entities

VIEs are entities that lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE's assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets.

69

The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated.

In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new lease standard”). The new lease standard was effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2019.

We adopted the standard by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application and as a result did not restate the prior periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The new lease standard provides for a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We did not elect the “package of practical expedients” and as a result reassessed under the new lease standard our prior accounting conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We elected to use hindsight for determining the reasonably certain lease term. We did not elect the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as it is not applicable to us.

The new lease standard provides practical expedients and policy elections for an entity’s ongoing accounting. Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements whereby we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption, which includes the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for existing short-term leases at transition. We have also applied this election to all active leases at transition.

The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following:

In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease, we consider factors such as if we have obtained or transferred substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity, if we can or if we have transferred the ability to direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor has substantive substitution rights.

We recognized right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases that have not previously been recorded. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as prepaid rent and deferred rent, which we remeasured at adoption due to the application of hindsight to our lease term estimates. Deferred and prepaid rent are no longer presented separately.

Capital lease assets previously included within Property and equipment, net were reclassified to financing lease right-of-use assets, and capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” have been renamed to align with the new terminology presented in the new lease standard; “Repayment of capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Repayments of financing lease obligations” and “Assets acquired under capital lease obligations” is now presented as “Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.” In the “Operating Activities” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and “Short and long-term operating lease liabilities” which represent the change
70

in the operating lease asset and liability, respectively. Additionally, in the “Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information” section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows we have added “Operating lease payments,” and in the “Noncash investing and financing activities” section we have added “Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations.”

In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.

Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation was incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We elected the use of hindsight whereby we applied current lease term assumptions that are applied to new leases in determining the expected lease term period for all cell sites. Upon adoption of the new lease standard and application of hindsight, our expected lease term has shortened to reflect payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only. This assessment corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases and aligns with the payments that have been disclosed as lease commitments in prior years. As a result, the average remaining lease term for cell sites has decreased from approximately nine to five years based on lease contracts in effect at transition on January 1, 2019. The aggregate impact of using hindsight is an estimated decrease in Total operating expenses of $240 million in fiscal year 2019.

We were also required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks of certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. Determining whether the transfer of control criteria has been met requires significant judgement.

We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the 6,200 tower sites transferred to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) pursuant to a master prepaid lease arrangement; therefore, these sites will continue to be accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks.

We concluded that a sale should be recognized for the 900 tower sites transferred to CCI pursuant to the sale of a subsidiary and for the 500 tower sites transferred to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”). Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for the leaseback of the tower sites. The impacts from the change in accounting conclusion are primarily a decrease in Other revenues of $44 million and a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million in fiscal year 2019.

Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under the new lease standard. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under the former lease standard.

71

Including the impacts from a change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites, the cumulative effect of initially applying the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 is as follows:
January 1, 2019
(in millions)Beginning BalanceCumulative Effect AdjustmentBeginning Balance, As Adjusted
Assets
Other current assets$1,676  $(78) $1,598  
Property and equipment, net23,359  (2,339) 21,020  
Operating lease right-of-use assets—  9,251  9,251  
Financing lease right-of-use assets—  2,271  2,271  
Other intangible assets, net198  (12) 186  
Other assets1,623  (71) 1,552  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities7,741  (65) 7,676  
Other current liabilities787  28  815  
Short-term and long-term debt12,965  (2,015) 10,950  
Tower obligations2,557  (345) 2,212  
Deferred tax liabilities4,472  231  4,703  
Deferred rent expense2,781  (2,781) —  
Short-term and long-term operating lease liabilities—  11,364  11,364  
Short-term and long-term financing lease liabilities—  2,016  2,016  
Other long-term liabilities967  (64) 903  
Accumulated deficit(12,954) 653  (12,301) 

Including the impacts from the change in the accounting conclusion on the 1,400 previously failed sale-leaseback tower sites and the change in presentation on the income statement of the 6,200 tower sites for which a sale did not occur, the cumulative effects of initially applying the new lease standard for the year ended December 31, 2019 are estimated as follows:

The aggregate impact is a decrease in Other revenues of $185 million, a decrease in Total operating expenses of $380 million, a decrease in Interest expense of $34 million and an increase to Net income of $175 million.

The impact on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is a decrease in Net cash provided by operating activities of $10 millionand a decrease in Net cash used in financing activities of $10 million.

For arrangements where we are the lessor, including arrangements to lease devices to our service customers, the adoption of the new lease standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements as these leases are classified as operating leases.

Device lease payments are presented as Equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognition of equipment revenue on lease contracts that are determined to not be probable of collection is limited to the amount of payments received. We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the consideration in the contract all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).

At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from Inventory to Property and equipment, net. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net, are recorded as Inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or market with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

We do not have any leasing transactions with related parties. See Note 15 - Leases for further information.

We have implemented significant new lease accounting systems, processes and internal controls over lease accounting to assist us in the application of the new lease standard.



72

Lease Expense

We have operating leases for cell sites, retail locations, corporate offices and dedicated transportation lines, some of which have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.

We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites.

We have financing leases for certain network equipment. The financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. Lease expense for our financing leases is comprised of the amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the effective interest method.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard will become effective for us beginning on January 1, 2020, and requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach).

We will adopt the new credit loss standard on January 1, 2020, and plan to recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures whereas we currently recognize credit losses only when it is probable that they have been incurred. We will also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, excluding consideration of any unamortized discount on those receivables resulting from the imputation of interest. We currently offset our estimate of incurred losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model and are refining the inputs including the forward-looking loss indicators. The estimated impact of the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio as of December 31, 2019, would be an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $85 million to $95 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $22 million to $25 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $63 million to $70 million.

Cloud Computing Arrangements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. We will adopt the standard on a prospective basis beginning on the effective date of January 1, 2020. Upon adoption of the standard, implementation costs are capitalized in the period incurred, which will result in an increase to Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These capitalized amounts will be amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement to Cost of services or Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income based on the nature of the hosting arrangement. The impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements is dependent on the nature and composition of the hosting arrangements entered into subsequent to adoption.

73

Income Taxes

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." The standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted for us at any time. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and the timing of adoption.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) did not have, or are not expected to have, a significant impact on our present or future Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2 – Business Combinations

Proposed Sprint Transactions

On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement to merge with Sprint in an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock (the “Merger”). The combined company will be named “T-Mobile” and, as a result of the Merger, is expected to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation and increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries. Neither T-Mobile nor Sprint on its own could generate comparable benefits to consumers.

The Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”) have been approved by the boards of directors of T-Mobile and Sprint and the required approvals of the stockholders of each of T-Mobile and Sprint have been obtained. Immediately following the Merger, it is anticipated that Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) and SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) will hold, directly or indirectly, on a fully diluted basis, approximately 41.5% and 27.2%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders, based on closing share prices and certain other assumptions as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). The funding of the debt facilities provided for in the Commitment Letter is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, including consummation of the Merger. The proceeds of the debt financing provided for in the Commitment Letter will be used to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing working capital needs of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, certain amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. There was no payment accrued as of December 31, 2019. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the "Consent Solicitation Statement"), we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. If the Merger is consummated, we will make payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. There were 0 consent payments accrued as of December 31, 2019.

Under the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, Sprint may be required to reimburse us for 33% of the consent, bank, and other fees we paid or accrued, which totaled $18 million as of December 31, 2019. There were 0 reimbursements accrued as of December 31, 2019. Sprint also obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to certain existing debt of Sprint and its subsidiaries. In connection with receiving the requisite consents, Sprint made upfront payments to third-party note holders and related bank fees of $242 million. Under the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, if the Business Combination Agreement is terminated, we may also be required to reimburse Sprint for 67% of the upfront consent and related bank fees it paid, which totaled $162 million as of December 31, 2019. There were 0 fees accrued as of December 31, 2019.

74

We recognized Merger-related costs of $620 million and $196 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs generally included consulting and legal fees and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Payments for Merger-related costs were $442 million and $86 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and were recognized within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Business Combination Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Sprint and us. If we terminate the Business Combination Agreement in connection with a failure to satisfy the closing condition related to specified minimum credit ratings for the combined company on the closing date of the Merger (after giving effect to the Merger) from at least two of the three credit rating agencies, then in certain circumstances, we may be required to pay Sprint an amount equal to $600 million.

On June 18, 2018, we filed a Public Interest Statement and applications for approval of the Merger with the FCC. On July 18, 2018, the FCC issued a Public Notice formally accepting our applications and establishing a period for public comment. On May 20, 2019, to facilitate the FCC’s review and approval of the FCC license transfers associated with the proposed Merger, we and Sprint filed with the FCC a written ex parte presentation (the “Presentation”) relating to the proposed Merger. The Presentation included proposed commitments from us and Sprint. The FCC approved the Merger on November 5, 2019.

On June 11, 2019, a number of state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against us, DT, Sprint, and SoftBank in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Merger, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and so should be enjoined. After it was filed, several additional states joined the lawsuit. Of the states that joined the lawsuit, two have subsequently withdrawn from the suit having resolved their concerns with the Merger. We believe the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, and have defended the case vigorously. Trial concluded after two weeks of witness testimony and presentation of document evidence. We are now waiting for the trial court’s ruling. On November 25, 2019, individual consumers filed a similar lawsuit in the Northern District of California. That case has been stayed pending the outcome of the New York litigation.

On July 26, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Sprint and DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”). We and Sprint are collectively referred to as the “Sellers.” Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH will acquire Sprint’s prepaid wireless business, currently operated under the Boost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shenandoah Telecommunications Company and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), including customer accounts, inventory, contracts, intellectual property and certain other specified assets (the “Prepaid Business”), and will assume certain related liabilities (the “Prepaid Transaction”). DISH will pay the Sellers $1.4 billion for the Prepaid Business, subject to a working capital adjustment. The consummation of the Prepaid Transaction is subject to the consummation of the Merger and other customary closing conditions.

At the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, the Sellers and DISH will enter into (i) a License Purchase Agreement pursuant to which (a) the Sellers will sell certain 800 MHz spectrum licenses held by Sprint to DISH for a total of approximately $3.6 billion in a transaction to be completed, subject to certain additional closing conditions, following an application for FCC approval to be filed three years following the closing of the Merger and (b) the Sellers will have the option to lease back from DISH, as needed, a portion of the spectrum sold for an additional two years following the closing of the spectrum sale transaction, (ii) a Transition Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of transition services to DISH in connection with the Prepaid Business for a period of up to three years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, (iii) a Master Network Services Agreement providing for the Sellers’ provision of network services to customers of the Prepaid Business for a period of up to seven years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, and (iv) an Option to Acquire Tower and Retail Assets offering DISH the option to acquire certain decommissioned towers and retail locations from the Sellers, subject to obtaining all necessary third-party consents, for a period of up to five years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction.

On July 26, 2019, in connection with the entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement, we and the other parties to the Business Combination Agreement entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Business Combination Agreement. The Amendment extended the Outside Date (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) to November 1, 2019, or, if the Marketing Period (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) had started and was in effect at such date, then January 2, 2020. Because the Transactions were not completed by the Outside Date, each of T-Mobile and Sprint currently has the right to terminate the Business Combination Agreement or the terms may be amended.

On July 26, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) filed a complaint and a proposed final judgment (the “Proposed Consent Decree”) agreed to by us, DT, Sprint, SoftBank and DISH with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
75

The Proposed Consent Decree would fully resolve DOJ’s investigation into the Merger and would require the parties to, among other things, carry out the divestitures to be made pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement described above upon closing of the Merger. The Proposed Consent Decree is subject to judicial approval.

The consummation of the Merger remains subject to certain closing conditions. We expect the Merger will be permitted to close in early 2020.

Note 3 – Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Our portfolio of receivables is comprised of 2 portfolio segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables. Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service and leased device receivables, other carriers and third-party retail channels.

Based upon customer credit profiles, we classify the EIP receivables segment into 2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower delinquency risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher delinquency risk. Customers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.

To determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service and device plan characteristics.

The following table summarizes the EIP receivables, including imputed discounts and related allowance for credit losses:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
EIP receivables, gross$4,582  $4,534  
Unamortized imputed discount(299) (330) 
EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount4,283  4,204  
Allowance for credit losses(100) (119) 
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Equipment installment plan receivables, net$2,600  $2,538  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net1,583  1,547  
EIP receivables, net$4,183  $4,085  

To determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, we consider a number of credit quality factors, including historical credit losses and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, aging of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions.

We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on factors such as customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.

For EIP receivables, subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated incurred losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.

The EIP receivables had weighted average effective imputed interest rates of 8.8% and 10.0% as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

76

Activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivables segments were as follows:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
(in millions)Accounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotalAccounts Receivable AllowanceEIP Receivables AllowanceTotal
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period$67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  $102  $316  $418  
Bad debt expense77  230  307  69  228  297  104  284  388  
Write-offs, net of recoveries(83) (249) (332) (88) (240) (328) (120) (273) (393) 
Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivablesN/A  136  136  N/A  250  250  N/A  252  252  
Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivablesN/A  (167) (167) N/A  (185) (185) N/A  (183) (183) 
Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period$61  $399  $460  $67  $449  $516  $86  $396  $482  

Management considers the aging of receivables to be an important credit indicator. The following table provides delinquency status for the unpaid principal balance for receivables within the EIP portfolio segment, which we actively monitor as part of our current credit risk management practices and policies:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)PrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, grossPrimeSubprimeTotal EIP Receivables, gross
Current - 30 days past due$2,384  $2,108  $4,492  $1,987  $2,446  $4,433  
31 - 60 days past due13  28  41  15  32  47  
61 - 90 days past due 17  24   19  25  
More than 90 days past due 18  25   22  29  
Total receivables, gross$2,411  $2,171  $4,582  $2,015  $2,519  $4,534  

Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables

We have entered into transactions to sell certain service and EIP receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our Consolidated Financial Statements, are described below.

Sales of Service Accounts Receivable

Overview of the Transaction

In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement is $950 million. In February 2019, the service receivable sale arrangement was amended to extend the scheduled expiration date, as well as certain third-party credit support under the arrangement, to March 2021. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $924 million and $774 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.

In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a VIE, and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.

77

Variable Interest Entity

We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entity and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consists primarily of the deferred purchase price and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$350  $339  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities25  59  
Other current liabilities342  149  

Sales of EIP Receivables

Overview of the Transaction

In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “EIP sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the EIP sale arrangement is $1.3 billion, and the scheduled expiration date is November 2020.

As of both December 31, 2019 and 2018, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.3 billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis.

In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly-owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity for which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.

Variable Interest Entity

We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in the EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to the EIP BRE. Accordingly, we include the balances and results of operations of the EIP BRE in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consists primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to the EIP BRE:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Other current assets$344  $321  
Other assets89  88  
Other long-term liabilities18  22  

78

In addition, the EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of the EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in the EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of the EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.

Sales of Receivables

The transfers of service receivables and EIP receivables to the non-consolidated entities are accounted for as sales of financial assets. Once identified for sale, the receivable is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Upon sale, we derecognize the net carrying amount of the receivables.

We recognize the cash proceeds received upon sale in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We recognize proceeds net of the deferred purchase price, consisting of a receivable from the purchasers that entitles us to certain collections on the receivables. We recognize the collection of the deferred purchase price in Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions.

The deferred purchase price represents a financial asset that is primarily tied to the creditworthiness of the customers and which can be settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment, due to default by the customers on the underlying receivables. We elected, at inception, to measure the deferred purchase price at fair value with changes in fair value included in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The fair value of the deferred purchase price is determined based on a discounted cash flow model which uses primarily unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), including customer default rates. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, our deferred purchase price related to the sales of service receivables and EIP receivables was $781 million and $746 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the impact of the sale of certain service receivables and EIP receivables in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Derecognized net service receivables and EIP receivables$2,584  $2,577  
Other current assets694  660  
of which, deferred purchase price692  658  
Other long-term assets89  88  
of which, deferred purchase price89  88  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities25  59  
Other current liabilities342  149  
Other long-term liabilities18  22  
Net cash proceeds since inception1,944  1,879  
Of which:
Change in net cash proceeds during the year-to-date period65  (179) 
Net cash proceeds funded by reinvested collections1,879  2,058  

We recognized losses from sales of receivables, including adjustments to the receivables’ fair values and changes in fair value of the deferred purchase price, of $130 million, $157 million and $299 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Continuing Involvement

Pursuant to the sale arrangements described above, we have continuing involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables we sell as we service the receivables and are required to repurchase certain receivables, including ineligible receivables, aged receivables and receivables where write-off is imminent. We continue to service the customers and their related receivables, including facilitating customer payment collection, in exchange for a monthly servicing fee. As the receivables are sold on a revolving basis, the customer payment collections on sold receivables may be reinvested in new receivable sales. While servicing the receivables, we apply the same policies and procedures to the sold receivables as we apply to our owned receivables, and we continue to maintain normal relationships with our customers. Pursuant to the EIP sale
79

arrangement, under certain circumstances, we are required to deposit cash or replacement EIP receivables primarily for contracts terminated by customers under our JUMP! Program.

In addition, we have continuing involvement with the sold receivables as we may be responsible for absorbing additional credit losses pursuant to the sale arrangements. Our maximum exposure to loss related to the involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables sold under the sale arrangements was $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2019. The maximum exposure to loss, which is a required disclosure under U.S. GAAP, represents an estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances whereby we would not receive the deferred purchase price portion of the contractual proceeds withheld by the purchasers and would also be required to repurchase the maximum amount of receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements without consideration for any recovery. We believe the probability of these circumstances occurring is remote and the maximum exposure to loss is not an indication of our expected loss.

Note 5 – Property and Equipment

The components of property and equipment were as follows:
(in millions)Useful LivesDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Buildings and equipmentUp to 40 years$2,587  $2,428  
Wireless communications systemsUp to 20 years34,353  35,282  
Leasehold improvementsUp to 12 years1,345  1,299  
Capitalized softwareUp to 10 years12,705  11,712  
Leased wireless devicesUp to 18 months1,139  1,159  
Construction in progress2,973  2,776  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(33,118) (31,297) 
Property and equipment, net$21,984  $23,359  

We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment and spectrum intangible assets. We recognized capitalized interest of $473 million, $362 million and $136 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In December 2019, we sold 168 T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites to an unrelated third party in exchange for net proceeds of $38 million which are included in Proceeds from sales of tower sites within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. A gain of $13 million was recognized as a reduction in Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We lease back space at certain of the sold tower sites for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals.

Total depreciation expense relating to property and equipment was $6.0 billion, $6.4 billion and $5.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Included in the total depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $543 million, $940 million and $1.0 billion, respectively, related to leased wireless devices.

Asset retirement obligations are primarily for certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
Activity in our asset retirement obligations was as follows:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of year$609  $562  
Liabilities incurred35  26  
Liabilities settled(2) (9) 
Accretion expense32  30  
Changes in estimated cash flows(15) —  
Asset retirement obligations, end of year$659  $609  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Other long-term liabilities$659  $609  

The corresponding assets, net of accumulated depreciation, related to asset retirement obligations were $159 million and $194 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

80

Note 6 – Goodwill, Spectrum License Transactions and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:
(in millions)Goodwill
Historical goodwill$12,449 
Goodwill from acquisition of Layer3 TV218 
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2018(10,766)
Balance as of December 31, 20181,901 
Goodwill from acquisition in 201929 
Balance as of December 31, 2019$1,930 
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2019$(10,766)

In July 2019, we completed our acquisition of a mobile marketing company, for cash consideration of $32 million. Upon closing of the transaction, the acquired company became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary to T-Mobile. We recorded Goodwill of approximately $29 million, calculated as the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of net assets acquired. The acquired goodwill was allocated to our wireless reporting unit and will be tested for impairment at this level.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The financial results from the acquisition closing date through December 31, 2019 were not material to our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The acquisition was not material to our prior period consolidated results on a pro forma basis.

Spectrum Licenses

The following table summarizes our spectrum license activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(in millions)20192018
Spectrum licenses, beginning of year$35,559  $35,366  
Spectrum license acquisitions857  138  
Spectrum licenses transferred to held for sale—  (1) 
Costs to clear spectrum49  56  
Spectrum licenses, end of year$36,465  $35,559  

The following is a summary of significant spectrum transactions for the year ended December 31, 2019:

In June 2019, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 2,211 licenses in the 24 GHz and 28 GHz spectrum auctions for an aggregate price of $842 million.

At the inception of the 28 GHz spectrum auction in October 2018, we deposited $20 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of the 28 GHz spectrum auction in February 2019, we made an additional payment of $19 million for the purchase price of licenses won in the auction.

At the inception of the 24 GHz spectrum auction in February 2019, we deposited $147 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of the 24 GHz spectrum auction in June 2019, we made an additional payment of $656 million for the purchase price of licenses won in the auction.

The licenses are included in Spectrum licenses as of December 31, 2019, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash payments to acquire spectrum licenses and payments for costs to clear spectrum are included in Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The following is a summary of significant spectrum transactions for the year ended December 31, 2018:

We recorded spectrum licenses received as part of our acquisition of the remaining equity interest in Iowa Wireless Services, LLC, at their estimated fair value of approximately $87 million.

81

We closed on multiple spectrum purchase agreements in which we acquired total spectrum licenses of approximately $50 million for cash consideration.

In 2018, we signed a reciprocal long-term lease arrangement with Sprint in which both parties have the right to use a portion of spectrum owned by the other party. This executory agreement does not qualify as an acquisition of spectrum licenses, and we have not capitalized amounts related to the lease. The reciprocal long-term lease is a distinct transaction from the Merger.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Impairment Assessments

Our impairment assessment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets (spectrum licenses) resulted in 0 impairment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Other Intangible Assets

The components of Other intangible assets were as follows:
Useful LivesDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)Gross AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet AmountGross AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Amount
Customer listsUp to 6 years$1,104  $(1,104) $—  $1,104  $(1,086) $18  
Trademarks and patentsUp to 19 years323  (258) 65  312  (225) 87  
OtherUp to 28 years100  (50) 50  149  (56) 93  
Other intangible assets$1,527  $(1,412) $115  $1,565  $(1,367) $198  

Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $82 million, $124 million and $163 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization are summarized below:
(in millions)Estimated Future Amortization
Year Ending December 31,
2020$83  
202114  
2022 
2023 
2024 
Thereafter 
Total$115  

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements

The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts receivable from affiliates, Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, borrowings under vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers, and borrowings under our revolving credit facility with DT, our majority stockholder, approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Interest rate lock derivatives
Periodically, we use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, such as interest rate risk. We designated certain derivatives as hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (cash flow hedge) to help minimize significant, unplanned fluctuations in cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
We record interest rate lock derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value that is derived primarily from observable market data, including yield curves. Interest rate lock derivatives were classified as Level 2 in the fair value
82

hierarchy. Cash flows associated with qualifying hedge derivative instruments are presented in the same category on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the item being hedged.
In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion and $447 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, no amounts were accrued or amortized into Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Aggregate changes in fair value, net of tax, of $868 million and $332 million are presented in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
In November 2019, we extended the mandatory termination date on our interest rate lock derivatives to June 3, 2020. In December 2019, we made net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaling $632 million, which included variation margin transfers to (or from) such derivative counterparties based on daily market movements. These collateral transfers are included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheetsand inNet cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.The interest rate lock derivatives will be settled upon the earlier of the issuance of fixed-rate debt or the mandatory termination date. Upon settlement of the interest rate lock derivatives, we will receive, or make, a cash payment in the amount of the fair value of the cash flow hedge as of the settlement date.
Embedded derivatives
In connection with our business combination with MetroPCS, we issued senior reset notes to DT. We determined certain components of the reset feature are required to be bifurcated from the senior reset notes and separately accounted for as embedded derivative instruments.
The interest rates on our senior reset notes to DT were adjusted at the reset dates to rates defined in the applicable supplemental indentures to manage interest rate risk related to the senior reset notes. Our embedded derivatives are recorded at fair value primarily based on unobservable inputs and were classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for 2019 and 2018.

Effective April 28, 2019, we redeemed $600 million aggregate principal amount of our 9.332% Senior Reset Notes due 2023 held by DT. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 104.666% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon) and were paid on April 29, 2019. The write-off of embedded derivatives upon redemption of the DT Senior Reset Notes resulted in a gain of $11 million and is included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The fair value of embedded derivative instruments was $19 million as of December 31, 2018, and is included in Other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recognized $8 million, $29 million and $52 million from the gain activity related to embedded derivatives instruments in Interest expense to affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Deferred Purchase Price Assets

In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.

The carrying amounts and fair values of our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
Level within the Fair Value HierarchyDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)Carrying AmountFair ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
Assets:
Deferred purchase price assets3$781  $781  $746  $746  

Long-term Debt

The fair value of our Senior Notes to third parties was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of our Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates were determined based on a discounted cash flow approach using market interest rates of instruments with similar terms and maturities and an estimate for our standalone credit risk.
83

Accordingly, our Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates were classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Although we have determined the estimated fair values using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment was required in interpreting market data to develop fair value estimates for the Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates. The fair value estimates were based on information available as of December 31, 2019, and 2018. As such, our estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange.

The carrying amounts and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
Level within the Fair Value HierarchyDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
(in millions)Carrying AmountFair ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
Liabilities:
Senior Notes to third parties1$10,958  $11,479  $10,950  $10,945  
Senior Notes to affiliates29,986  10,366  9,984  9,802  
Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates24,000  4,000  4,000  3,976  
Senior Reset Notes to affiliates2—  —  598  640  

Guarantee Liabilities

We offer a device trade-in program, JUMP!, which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee, incorporating the expected probability and timing of handset upgrade and the estimated fair value of the handset which is returned. Accordingly, our guarantee liabilities were classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. Guarantee liabilities are included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The carrying amounts of our guarantee liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were $62 million and $73 million as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

The total estimated remaining gross EIP receivable balances of all enrolled handset upgrade program customers, which are the remaining EIP amounts underlying the JUMP! guarantee, including EIP receivables that have been sold, was $2.1$3.0 billion as of December 31, 2016.2019. This is not an indication of our expected loss exposure as it does not consider the expected fair value of the used handset or the probability and timing of the trade-in.























84

Note 78 – Debt


Debt was as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
5.300% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021$2,000  $2,000  
4.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20221,000  1,000  
4.000% Senior Notes due 2022500  500  
Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2022  2,000  2,000  
6.000% Senior Notes due 20231,300  1,300  
9.332% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023—  600  
6.000% Senior Notes due 20241,000  1,000  
6.500% Senior Notes due 20241,000  1,000  
6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20241,350  1,350  
6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024650  650  
Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2024  2,000  2,000  
5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20251,250  1,250  
5.125% Senior Notes due 2025500  500  
6.375% Senior Notes due 20251,700  1,700  
6.500% Senior Notes due 20262,000  2,000  
4.500% Senior Notes due 20261,000  1,000  
4.500% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20261,000  1,000  
5.375% Senior Notes due 2027500  500  
5.375% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20271,250  1,250  
4.750% Senior Notes due 20281,500  1,500  
4.750% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20281,500  1,500  
Capital leases (1)
—  2,015  
Unamortized premium on debt to affiliates  43  52  
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes to affiliates  (53) (64) 
Financing arrangements for property and equipment  25  —  
Debt issuance costs and consent fees  (46) (56) 
Total debt  24,969  27,547  
Less: Current portion of capital leases  —  841  
Less: Financing arrangements for property and equipment  25  —  
Total long-term debt  $24,944  $26,706  
Classified on the balance sheet as:  
Long-term debt  $10,958  $12,124  
Long-term debt to affiliates  13,986  14,582  
Total long-term debt  $24,944  $26,706  
(1)Capital lease liabilities previously included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt were reclassified to Financing lease liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional details.


85

(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
5.250% Senior Notes due 2018$500
 $500
6.288% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 20191,250
 1,250
6.464% Senior Notes due 20191,250
 1,250
6.366% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 20201,250
 1,250
6.542% Senior Notes due 20201,250
 1,250
6.625% Senior Notes due 20201,000
 1,000
6.250% Senior Notes due 20211,750
 1,750
6.633% Senior Notes due 20211,250
 1,250
8.097% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 20211,250
 1,250
6.125% Senior Notes due 20221,000
 1,000
6.731% Senior Notes due 20221,250
 1,250
8.195% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 20221,250
 1,250
6.000% Senior Notes due 20231,300
 1,300
6.625% Senior Notes due 20231,750
 1,750
6.836% Senior Notes due 2023600
 600
9.332% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023600
 600
6.000% Senior Notes due 20241,000
 
6.500% Senior Notes due 20241,000
 1,000
6.375% Senior Notes due 20251,700
 1,700
6.500% Senior Notes due 20262,000
 2,000
Senior Secured Term Loans1,980
 2,000
Capital leases1,425
 826
Unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment212
 250
Unamortized discount on Senior Secured Term Loans(8) (10)
Debt issuance cost(23) (23)
Total debt27,786
 26,243
Less: Current portion of Senior Secured Term Loans20
 20
Less: Current portion of capital leases334
 162
Total long-term debt$27,432
 $26,061
    
Classified on the balance sheet as:   
Long-term debt$21,832
 $20,461
Long-term debt to affiliates5,600
 5,600
Total long-term debt$27,432
 $26,061
Debt to Affiliates


Long-term DebtDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, we made the following note redemption:

(in millions)Principal Amount
Write -off of Embedded Derivatives (1)
Other (2)
Redemption
Date
Redemption Price
9.332% Senior Notes due 2023$600  $11  $28  April 28, 2019104.6660 %
(1)Certain components of the reset features were required to be bifurcated from the DT Senior Reset Notes and separately accounted for as embedded derivative instruments. The write-off of embedded derivatives upon redemption resulted in a gain and is included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and in Losses on redemption of debt within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
(2)Cash for the premium portion of the redemption price set forth in the indenture governing the DT Senior Reset Notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest on the DT Senior Reset Notes. The redemption premium was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and in Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Incremental Term Loan Facility

In March 2016, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), a subsidiary2018, we amended the terms of T-Mobile US, Inc., and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”), our majority stockholder, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “5.300% Senior Notes”) for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 billion. As amended in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 5.300% Senior Notes on or prior to May 5, 2017, the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As of December 31, 2016, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant. In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche Telekom for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration of the extended commitments, which is not expected to be significant.

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $1.0 billion of public 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024, (ii) entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue

and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to $1.35 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 and (iii) entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell up to an additional $650 million of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.  

The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $1.35 billion purchase agreement will be approximately 103.316% of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. As amended in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 6.000% Senior Notes under the $1.35 billion purchase agreement on or prior to May 5, 2017 or elects to issue less than $1.35 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As of December 31, 2016, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant. In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche Telekom for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration of the extended commitments, which is not expected to be significant.

The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the $650 million purchase agreement will be approximately 104.047% of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. As amended in October 2016, if T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the 6.000% Senior Notes under the $650 million purchase agreement on or prior to May 5, 2017 or elects to issue less than $650 million of 6.000% Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As of December 31, 2016, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant. In addition, T-Mobile USA is required to reimburse Deutsche Telekom for its cost of hedging arrangements related to the extension for the duration of the extended commitments, which is not expected to be significant.

In January 2017, T-Mobile USA borrowed $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”) with Deutsche Telekom to refinance $1.98DT, our majority stockholder. Following this amendment, the applicable margin payable on LIBOR indexed loans is 1.50% under the $2.0 billion of outstanding secured term loans under itsIncremental Term Loan Credit Agreement datedFacility maturing on November 9, 2015, with2022 and 1.75% under the remaining net proceeds from the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt.$2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility maturing on January 31, 2024. The loans underamendment also modified the Incremental Term Loan Facility to update certain covenants and other provisions to make them substantially consistent, subject to certain additional carve outs, with our most recently issued public notes. NaN issuance fees were drawnincurred related to this debt facility for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Commitment Letter

In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”), with certain financial institutions named therein that have committed to provide up to $30.0 billion in two tranchessecured and unsecured debt financing, including a $4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility, a $7.0 billion secured term loan facility, and a $19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility. On September 6, 2019, T-Mobile USA amended and restated the Commitment Letter which (i) reduced the commitments under the secured term loan facility from $7.0 billion to $4.0 billionand (ii) extended the commitments thereunder through May 1, 2020. The funding of the debt facilities provided for in the Commitment Letter is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, including consummation of the Merger. The proceeds of the debt financing provided for in the Commitment Letter will be used to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing working capital needs of the combined company.

In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we expect to incur certain fees payable to the financial institutions, including certain financing fees on January 31, 2017 (i) $2.0 billionthe secured term loan commitment. If the Merger closes, we will incur additional fees for the financial institutions structuring and providing the commitments and certain take-out fees associated with the issuance of which will bear interest at a rate equalpermanent secured bond debt in lieu of the secured bridge loan. In total, we may incur up to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and will matureapproximately $340 million in fees associated with the Commitment Letter. We began incurring certain Commitment Letter fees on November 9, 20221, 2019, which were recognized in Selling, general and (ii) $2.0 billionadministrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of which will bear interest atComprehensive Income. There were $12 million of fees accrued as of December 31, 2019.

Financing Matters Agreement

Pursuant to the Financing Matters Agreement, DT agreed, among other things, to consent to the incurrence by T-Mobile USA of secured debt in connection with and after the consummation of the Merger, and to provide a rate equallock up on sales thereby as to a per annum ratecertain senior notes of LIBOR plus a marginT-Mobile USA held thereby. In addition, T-Mobile USA agreed, among other things, to repay and terminate, upon closing of 2.25% and will mature on January 31, 2024. Thethe Merger, the Incremental Term Loan Facility increases Deutsche Telekom’s incremental term loan commitment provided toand the revolving credit facility of T-Mobile USA which are provided by DT, as well as $2.0 billion of T-Mobile USA’s 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 and $2.0 billion of T-Mobile USA’s 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024. In addition, T-Mobile USA and DT agreed, upon closing of the Merger, to amend the $1.25 billion of T-Mobile USA’s 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 and $1.25 billion of T-Mobile USA’s 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 to change the maturity dates thereof to April 15, 2021 and April 15, 2022, respectively (the “2025 and 2027 Amendments”). In connection with receiving the requisite consents, we made upfront payments to DT of $7 million during the second quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt to affiliates in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In accordance with the consents received from DT, on December 20, 2018, T-Mobile USA, the guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, executed and delivered the 38th supplemental indenture to
86

the Indenture, pursuant to which, with respect to certain T-Mobile USA Senior Notes held by DT, the Proposed Amendments (as defined below under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated“Consents on Debt to Third Parties”) and the 2025 and 2027 Amendments will become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, we will make additional payments for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. There were 0 additional payments accrued as of December 29, 201631, 2019 and 2018.

Consents on Debt to Third Parties

On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement, we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to our Senior Notes to third parties in connection with the Business Combination Agreement. Pursuant to the Consent Solicitation Statement, third-party note holders agreed, among other things, to consent to increasing the amount of Secured Indebtedness under Credit Facilities that can be incurred from $660 million to $2.0the greater of $9.0 billion and provides150% of Consolidated Cash Flow to T-Mobile USAthe greater of $9.0 billion and an additional $2.0 billion incrementalamount that would not cause the Secured Debt to Cash Flow Ratio (calculated net of cash and cash equivalents) to exceed 2.00x (the “Ratio Secured Debt Proposed Amendments”) and in each case as such capitalized term loan commitment. See Note 14 – Subsequent Eventsis defined in the Indenture. In connection with receiving the requisite consents for further information.the Ratio Secured Debt Proposed Amendments, we made upfront payments to third-party note holders of $17 million during the second quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These upfront payments increased the effective interest rate of the related debt.


In addition, note holders agreed, among other things, to allow certain entities related to Sprint’s existing spectrum securitization notes program (“Existing Sprint Spectrum Program”) to be non-guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that the principal amount of the spectrum notes issued and outstanding under the Existing Sprint Spectrum Program does not exceed $7.0 billion and that the principal amount of such spectrum notes reduces the amount available under the Credit Facilities ratio basket, and to revise the definition of GAAP to mean generally accepted accounting principles in effect from time to time, unless the Company elects to “freeze” GAAP as of any date, and to exclude the effect of the changes in the accounting treatment of lease obligations (the “Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Proposed Amendments,” and together with the Ratio Secured Debt Proposed Amendments, the “Proposed Amendments”). In connection with receiving the requisite consents for the Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Proposed Amendments, we made upfront payments to third-party note holders of $14 million during the second quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These upfront payments increased the effective interest rate of the related debt.

In connection with obtaining the requisite consents, on May 20, 2018, T-Mobile USA, the guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, executed and delivered the 37th supplemental indenture to the new debt issued,Indenture, pursuant to which, with respect to each of the Notes, the Proposed Amendments will become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.

We paid third-party bank fees associated with obtaining the requisite consents related to the Proposed Amendments of $6 million during the second quarter of 2018, which we recognized as Selling, general and purchase commitmentsadministrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. If the Merger is consummated, we will make additional payments to third-party note holders for requisite consents related to the Ratio Secured Debt Proposed Amendments of up to $54 million and additional payments to third-party note holders for requisite consents related to the Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Proposed Amendments of up to $41 million. There were 0 payments accrued as of December 31, 2019.

Financing Arrangements

We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Telekom,Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the supplemental indentures governingfinancing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. The interest rate on the Senior Resetfinancing arrangement is determined based on LIBOR plus a specified margin per the arrangement. Obligations under the financing arrangement are included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 0 outstanding balances.

We maintain vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we utilized $800 million and repaid $775 million under the vendor financing arrangements. Invoices subject to extended payment terms have various due dates through the first quarter of 2020. Payments on vendor financing agreements are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2019, there was $25 million in outstanding borrowings under the vendor financing agreements which were included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, there was 0 outstanding balance.

87

Revolving Credit Facility

We maintain a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with DT which is comprised of a $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and a $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. In December 2019, we amended the terms of the revolving credit facility with DT to extend the maturity date to December 29, 2022.

The proceeds and borrowings from the revolving credit facility are presented in Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility and Repayments of revolving credit facility within Net cash used in financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 0 outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Standby Letters of Credit

For the purposes of securing our obligations to provide handset insurance services, we maintain an agreement for standby letters of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan Chase”). For purposes of securing our general purpose obligations, we maintain a letter of credit reimbursement agreement with Deutsche Bank.

The following table summarizes the outstanding standby letters of credit under each agreement:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
JP Morgan Chase$20  $20  
Deutsche Bank93  66  
Total outstanding balance$113  $86  

Note 9 – Tower Obligations

In 2012, we conveyed to CCI the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 7,100 T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites in exchange for net proceeds of $2.5 billion (the “2012 Tower Transaction”). Rights to approximately 6,200 of the tower sites were transferred to CCI via a master prepaid lease with site lease terms ranging from 23 to 37 years (“CCI Lease Sites”), while the remaining tower sites were sold to CCI (“CCI Sales Sites”). CCI has fixed-price purchase options for the adjustmentCCI Lease Sites totaling approximately $2.0 billion, exercisable at the end of the lease term. We lease back space at certain tower sites for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.

In 2015, we conveyed to PTI the exclusive right to manage and operate certain T-Mobile-owned wireless communications tower sites (“PTI Sales Sites”) in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $140 million (the “2015 Tower Transaction”). Rights to approximately 150 of the tower sites remain operated by PTI under a management agreement. We lease back space at certain tower sites for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.

Assets and liabilities associated with the operation of the tower sites were transferred to special purpose entities (“SPEs”). Assets included ground lease agreements or deeds for the land on which the towers are situated, the towers themselves and existing subleasing agreements with other mobile network operator tenants, who lease space at the tower sites. Liabilities included the obligation to pay ground lease rentals, property taxes and other executory costs. Upon closing of the 2012 Tower Transaction, CCI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPE containing CCI Sales Sites and an option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites at the end of their respective lease terms and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites. Upon closing of the 2015 Tower Transaction, PTI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPEs containing PTI Sales Sites and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites.

We determined the SPEs containing the CCI Lease Sites (“Lease Site SPEs”) are VIEs as our equity investment lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. These activities include managing tenants and underlying ground leases, performing repair and maintenance on the towers, the obligation to absorb expected losses and the right to receive the expected future residual returns from the purchase option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites. As we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary and do not have a controlling financial interest ratesin the Lease Site SPEs, the balances and operating results of the Lease Site SPEs are not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Due to our continuing involvement with the tower sites, we previously determined that we were precluded from applying sale-leaseback accounting. We recorded long-term financial obligations in the amount of the net proceeds received and recognized interest on the tower obligations at a rate of approximately 8% for the 2012 Tower Transaction and 5% for the 2015 Tower Transaction using the effective interest method. The tower obligations are increased by interest expense and amortized through
88

contractual leaseback payments made by us to CCI or PTI and through net cash flows generated and retained by CCI or PTI from operation of the tower sites. The principal payments on the tower obligations are included in Other, net within Net cash used in financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Our historical tower site asset costs are reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated.

Upon adoption of the new leasing standard we were required to reassess the previously failed sale-leasebacks and determine whether the transfer of the assets to the tower operator under the arrangement met the transfer of control criteria in the revenue standard and whether a sale should be recognized. We concluded that a sale has not occurred for the CCI Lease Sites and these sites continue to be accounted for as a failed sale-leaseback. We concluded that a sale had occurred for the CCI Sales Sites and the PTI Sales Sites and therefore we derecognized our existing long-term financial obligation and the tower-related property and equipment associated with these sites as part of the cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2019. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

The following table summarizes the balances of the failed sale-leasebacks in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Property and equipment, net$198  $329  
Tower obligations2,236  2,557  

Future minimum payments related to the tower obligations are approximately $160 million for the year ending December 31, 2020, $321 million in total for the years ending December 31, 2021 and 2022, $320 million in total for years ending December 31, 2023 and 2024, and $467 million in total for years thereafter.

We are contingently liable for future ground lease payments through the remaining term of the CCI Lease Sites. These contingent obligations are not included in Operating lease liabilities as any amount due is contractually owed by CCI based on the subleasing arrangement.

Note 10 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Disaggregation of Revenue

We provide wireless communications services to three primary categories of customers:

Branded postpaid customers generally include customers who are qualified to pay after receiving wireless communications services utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS, or other connected devices which includes tablets and SyncUP DRIVE™;
Branded prepaid customers generally include customers who pay for wireless communications services in advance. Our branded prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile; and
Wholesale customers include Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and Mobile Virtual Network Operator (“MVNO”) customers that operate on our network but are managed by wholesale partners.

Branded postpaid service revenues, including branded postpaid phone revenues and branded postpaid other revenues, were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Branded postpaid service revenues
Branded postpaid phone revenues$21,329  $19,745  $18,371  
Branded postpaid other revenues1,344  1,117  1,077  
Total branded postpaid service revenues$22,673  $20,862  $19,448  

We operate as a single operating segment. The balances presented within each revenue line item in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income represent categories of revenue from contracts with customers disaggregated by type of product and service. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value added services to customers, such as handset insurance services. Revenue generated from the lease of mobile communication devices is included within Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

89

Equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices$599  $692  $877  

Contract Balances

The opening and closing balances of our contract asset and contract liability balances from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, were as follows:
(in millions)Contract AssetsContract Liabilities
Balance as of December 31, 2018$51  $645  
Balance as of December 31, 201963  560  
Change$12  $(85) 

Contract assets primarily represent revenue recognized for equipment sales with promotional bill credits offered to customers that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract. The change in the contract asset balance includes customer activity related to new promotions, offset by billings on existing contracts and impairment which is recognized as bad debt expense. The current portion of our Contract Assets of approximately $50 million and $51 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, was included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contract liabilities are recorded when fees are collected, or we have an unconditional right to consideration (a receivable) in advance of delivery of goods or services. The change in contract liabilities is primarily related to the migration of customers to unlimited rate plans. Contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, include the following:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)20192018
Amounts included in the beginning of year contract liability balance$643  $710  

Remaining Performance Obligations

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining service performance obligations for branded postpaid contracts with promotional bill credits that result in an extended service contract is $237 million. We expect to recognize this revenue as service is provided over the extended contract term in the next 24 months.

Certain of our wholesale, roaming and other service contracts include variable consideration based on usage. This variable consideration has been excluded from the disclosure of remaining performance obligations. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of the contractual minimum consideration for wholesale, roaming and other service contracts is $1.3 billion, $894 million and $791 million for 2020, 2021 and 2022 and beyond, respectively. These contracts have a remaining duration ranging from less than one year to ten years.

Information about remaining performance obligations that are part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less have been excluded from the above, which primarily consists of monthly service contracts.

Contract Costs

The total balance of deferred incremental costs to obtain contracts was $906 million and $644 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Deferred contract costs incurred to obtain postpaid service contracts are amortized over a period of 24 months. The amortization period is monitored to reflect any significant change in assumptions. Amortization of deferred contract costs is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and was $604 million and $267 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The deferred contract cost asset is assessed for impairment on a periodic basis. There were 0 impairment losses recognized on deferred contract cost assets for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.


90

Note 11 – Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans

Under our 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"), we are authorized to issue up to 82 million shares of our common stock. Under the Incentive Plan, we can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants, advisors and non-employee directors. As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 19 million shares of common stock available for future grants under the Incentive Plan.

We grant RSUs to eligible employees, key executives and certain non-employee directors and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to eligible key executives. RSUs entitle the grantee to receive shares of our common stock upon vesting (with vesting generally occurring annually over a three year period), subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. PRSUs entitle the holder to receive shares of our common stock at various reset datesthe end of a performance period of generally up to ratesthree years if the applicable performance goals are achieved and generally subject to continued service through the applicable performance period. The number of shares ultimately received by the holder of PRSUs is dependent on our business performance against the specified performance goal(s) over a pre-established performance period. We also maintain an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”), under which eligible employees can purchase our common stock at a discounted price.

Stock-based compensation expense and related income tax benefits were as follows:
(in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Stock-based compensation expense$495  $424  $306  
Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation$92  $81  $73  
Weighted average fair value per stock award granted$73.25  $61.52  $60.21  
Unrecognized compensation expense$515  $547  $445  
Weighted average period to be recognized (years)1.61.81.9
Fair value of stock awards vested$512  $471  $503  

Stock Awards

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
(in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts)Number of Units or AwardsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Nonvested, December 31, 201811,010,635  $57.66  1.0$700  
Granted6,099,719  73.13  
Vested(5,862,128) 55.52  
Forfeited(745,015) 65.87  
Nonvested, December 31, 201910,503,211  67.31  0.9824  

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
(in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts)Number of Units or AwardsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Nonvested, December 31, 20183,851,554  $64.03  1.6$245  
Granted1,046,792  73.98  
Vested(1,006,404) 52.47  
Forfeited(88,403) 62.02  
Nonvested, December 31, 20193,803,539  69.78  1.0300  
PRSUs included in the table above are shown at target. Share payout can range from 0% to 200% based on different performance outcomes.

Payment of the underlying shares in connection with the vesting of stock awards generally triggers a tax obligation for the employee, which is required to be remitted to the relevant tax authorities. We have agreed to withhold shares of common stock otherwise issuable under the award to cover certain of these tax obligations, with the net shares issued to the employee accounted for as outstanding common stock. We withheld 2,094,555 and 2,321,827 shares of common stock to cover tax
91

obligations associated with the payment of shares upon vesting of stock awards and remitted cash of $156 million and $146 million to the appropriate tax authorities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Our ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of our shares of common stock at a discounted price, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount. Employees can purchase stock at a 15% discount applied to the closing stock price on the first or last day of the six-month offering period, whichever price is lower. The number of shares issued under our ESPP was 2,091,650 and 2,011,794 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the number of securities remaining available for future sale and issuance under the ESPP was 1,397,894.

Our ESPP provides for an annual increase in the aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for sale and authorized for issuance thereunder as of the first day of each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2016) equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”). For fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that no such increase in shares of our common stock was necessary. However, an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock were automatically added to the ESPP share reserve as of January 1, 2020.

Stock Options

Stock options outstanding relate to the Metro Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended and Restated Metro Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, and the Layer3 TV, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan (collectively, the “Stock Option Plans”). No new awards have been or may be granted under the Stock Option Plans.

The following activity occurred under the Stock Option Plans:
SharesWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Outstanding at December 31, 2018284,811  $14.58  3.8
Exercised(85,083) 15.94  
Expired/canceled(4,786) 22.75  
Outstanding at December 31, 2019194,942  13.80  2.9
Exercisable at December 31, 2019180,966  13.48  2.6

Stock options exercised under the Stock Option Plans generated proceeds of approximately $1 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Employee Retirement Savings Plan

We sponsor a retirement savings plan for the majority of our employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and similar plans. The plans allow employees to contribute a portion of their pretax and post-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. The plans provide that we match a percentage of employee contributions up to certain limits. Employer matching contributions were $119 million, $102 million and $87 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 12 – Repurchases of Common Stock

2017 Stock Repurchase Program

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program completed on April 29, 2018.

92

The following table summarizes information regarding repurchases of our common stock under the 2017 Stock Repurchase Program:

(In millions, except shares and per share price)
Year ended December 31,Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Purchase Price
201816,738,758  $62.96  $1,054  
20177,010,889  63.34  444  
23,749,647  63.07  $1,498  

2018 Stock Repurchase Program

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and for up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our common stock through the year ending December 31, 2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no repurchases of our common stock under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018.

Under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable supplemental indenture.  legal requirements. The specific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other considerations. The 2018 Stock Repurchase Program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. Repurchased shares are retired.

Stock Purchases by Affiliate

In April 2016, the first quarter of 2018, DT, our majority stockholder and an affiliated purchaser, purchased 3.3 million additional shares of our common stock at an aggregate market value of $200 million in the public market or from other parties, in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. There were 0 purchases in the remainder of 2018 and in 2019. We did not receive proceeds from these purchases.

Note 13 – Income Taxes

Our sources of Income before income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
U.S.$4,557  $3,686  $3,274  
Puerto Rico46  231  (113) 
Income before income taxes$4,603  $3,917  $3,161  

93

Income tax (expense) benefit is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Current tax benefit (expense)
Federal$24  $39  $—  
State(70) (63) (28) 
Puerto Rico (25) (1) 
Total current tax expense(44) (49) (29) 
Deferred tax benefit (expense)
Federal(954) (750) 1,182  
State(125) (160) 173  
Puerto Rico(12) (70) 49  
Total deferred tax (expense) benefit(1,091) (980) 1,404  
Total income tax (expense) benefit$(1,135) $(1,029) $1,375  

The reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %35.0 %
Effect of law and rate changes0.4  1.9  (68.9) 
Change in valuation allowance(1.8) (1.6) (11.4) 
State taxes, net of federal benefit5.1  4.8  4.8  
Equity-based compensation(0.6) (0.6) (2.4) 
Puerto Rico taxes, net of federal benefit0.3  2.4  (1.5) 
Permanent differences1.2  1.3  0.5  
Federal tax credits, net of reserves(0.8) (2.9) 0.3  
Other, net(0.1) —  0.1  
Effective income tax rate24.7 %26.3 %(43.5)%

Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, tax effected, are as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
Deferred tax assets
Loss carryforwards$823  $1,526  
Deferred rents—  784  
Lease liability3,403  —  
Reserves and accruals659  668  
Federal and state tax credits331  340  
Other903  620  
Deferred tax assets, gross6,119  3,938  
Valuation allowance(129) (210) 
Deferred tax assets, net5,990  3,728  
Deferred tax liabilities
Spectrum licenses5,902  5,494  
Property and equipment2,506  2,434  
Lease right-of-use assets2,881  —  
Other intangible assets19  40  
Other289  232  
Total deferred tax liabilities11,597  8,200  
Net deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  

94

As of December 31, 2019, we have tax effected net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $470 million for federal income tax purposes and $710 million for state income tax purposes, expiring through 2039. Federal NOLs and certain state NOLs generated in and after 2018 do not expire. As of December 31, 2019, our tax effected federal and state NOL carryforwards for financial reporting purposes were approximately $138 million and $282 million, respectively, less than our NOL carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes, due to unrecognized tax benefits of the same amount. The unrecognized tax benefit amounts exclude indirect tax effects of $63 million in other jurisdictions.

As of December 31, 2019, we have available Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of $23 million. The AMT credits will be fully recovered by 2021. We also have research and development and foreign tax credit carryforwards with a combined value of $347 million for federal income tax purposes, which begin to expire in 2020.

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, our valuation allowance was $129 million, $210 million and $273 million, respectively. The change from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 primarily related to a reduction in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions resulting from legal entity reorganizations. The change from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018 primarily related to a reduction in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions from a change in tax status of certain subsidiaries. We will continue to monitor positive and negative evidence related to the utilization of the remaining deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance continues to be provided. It is possible that our valuation allowance may change within the next twelve months.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and in Puerto Rico. We are currently under examination by various states. Management does not believe the resolution of any of the audits will result in a material change to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The IRS has concluded its audits of our federal tax returns through the 2013 tax year; however, NOL and other carryforwards for certain audited periods remain open for examination. We are generally closed to U.S. federal, state and Puerto Rico examination for years prior to 2000.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$462  $412  $410  
Gross (decreases) increases to tax positions in prior periods(7)  (10) 
Gross increases due to current period business acquisitions—  10  —  
Gross increases to current period tax positions59  34  12  
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$514  $462  $412  

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had $367 million and $315 million, respectively, in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our annual effective tax rate. Penalties and interest on income tax assessments are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and Interest expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are insignificant.

95

Note 14 – Earnings Per Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)201920182017
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic3,468  2,888  4,481  
Add: Dividends related to mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  55  
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Effect of dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards9,289,760  8,546,022  9,200,873  
Mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  30,736,504  
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  
Earnings per share - basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Earnings per share - diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Potentially dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards16,359  148,422  33,980  

As of December 31, 2019, we had authorized 100 million shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share. There was 0 preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share if to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

96

Note 15 - Leases

Leases (Topic 842) Disclosures

Lessee

We are lessee for non-cancelable operating and financing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores and office facilities with contractual terms that generally extend through 2029. The majority of cell site leases have an initial non-cancelable term of five to ten years with several renewal options that can extend the lease term from five to thirty-five years. In addition, we have financing leases for network equipment that generally have a non-cancelable lease term of two to five years; the financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease.

The components of lease expense were as follows:
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating lease expense$2,558 
Financing lease expense:
Amortization of right-of-use assets523 
Interest on lease liabilities82 
Total financing lease expense605 
Variable lease expense243 
Total lease expense$3,406 

Information relating to the lease term and discount rate is as follows:
December 31, 2019
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years)
Operating leases6
Financing leases3
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases4.8 %
Financing leases4.0 %

Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:
(in millions)Operating LeasesFinance Leases
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$2,754  $1,013  
20212,583  733  
20222,311  414  
20231,908  101  
20241,615  71  
Thereafter3,797  115  
Total lease payments14,968  2,447  
Less imputed interest2,142  144  
Total$12,826  $2,303  

Interest payments for financing leases for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $82 million.

As of December 31, 2019, we have additional operating leases for cell sites and commercial properties that have not yet commenced with future lease payments of approximately $341 million.

As of December 31, 2019, we were contingently liable for future ground lease payments related to the tower obligations. These contingent obligations are not included in the above table as the amounts owed are contractually owed by CCI based on the $600 million of Senior Resetsubleasing arrangement. See Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.

97

Lessor

JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. The purchase price at the expiration of the lease is established at lease commencement and reflects the estimated residual value of the device, which reflects the estimated fair value of the underlying asset at the end of the lease term. The JUMP! On Demand leases do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Leased wireless devices are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The components of leased wireless devices under our JUMP! On Demand program were as follows:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Leased wireless devices, gross$1,139  $1,159  
Accumulated depreciation(407) (622) 
Leased wireless devices, net$732  $537  

For equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices, see Note 10 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$417  
202199  
Total$516  

Leases (Topic 840) Disclosures

On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new lease standard using a modified-retrospective approach by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application and did not restate the prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements continue to be in accordance with the former lease standard, Topic 840 Leases. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

Operating Leases

Under the previous lease standard, we had non-cancelable operating leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores and office facilities. As of December 31, 2018, these leases had contractual terms expiring through 2028, with the majority of cell site leases having an initial non-cancelable term of five to ten years with several renewal options. In addition, we had operating leases for dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms through 2027.

Our commitments under leases existing as of December 31, 2018 were approximately $2.7 billion for the year ending December 31, 2019, $4.7 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021, $3.3 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023 and $3.8 billion in total for years thereafter.

Total rent expense under operating leases, including dedicated transportation lines, was adjusted from 5.950%$3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, and was classified as Cost of services and Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

98


Lessor

As of December 31, 2018, the future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Year Ended December 31,
2019$419  
202059  
Total$478  

Capital LeasesEmployee Stock Purchase Plan


Capital lease agreements relateOur ESPP allows eligible employees to network and IT equipment with varying expiration terms through 2030. Future minimum payments required under capital leases, including interest, over their remaining terms are summarized below:
(in millions)Future Minimum Payments
Year Ending December 31, 
2017$390
2018354
2019315
2020200
2021150
Thereafter214
Total$1,623
Interest included$198


Financing Arrangements

We maintain a handset financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG (“Deutsche Bank”), which allows forcontribute up to $108 million in borrowings.  Under15% of their eligible earnings toward the handset financing arrangement, wesemi-annual purchase of our shares of common stock at a discounted price, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount. Employees can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payablepurchase stock at a 15% discount applied to certain handset vendors.  The interest ratethe closing stock price on the handset financing arrangementfirst or last day of the six-month offering period, whichever price is determined based on LIBOR plus a specified margin perlower. The number of shares issued under our ESPP was 2,091,650 and 2,011,794 for the arrangement.  Obligations under the handset financing arrangement are included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  In 2016years ended December 31, 2019 and 2015, we utilized and repaid $100 million under the financing arrangement.2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the number of securities remaining available for future sale and issuance under the ESPP was 1,397,894.

Our ESPP provides for an annual increase in the aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for sale and authorized for issuance thereunder as of the first day of each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2016) equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”). For fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that no such increase in shares of our common stock was necessary. However, an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock were automatically added to the ESPP share reserve as of January 1, 2020.

Stock Options

Stock options outstanding relate to the Metro Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended and 2015, there wasRestated Metro Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, and the Layer3 TV, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan (collectively, the “Stock Option Plans”). No new awards have been or may be granted under the Stock Option Plans.

The following activity occurred under the Stock Option Plans:
SharesWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Outstanding at December 31, 2018284,811  $14.58  3.8
Exercised(85,083) 15.94  
Expired/canceled(4,786) 22.75  
Outstanding at December 31, 2019194,942  13.80  2.9
Exercisable at December 31, 2019180,966  13.48  2.6

Stock options exercised under the Stock Option Plans generated proceeds of approximately $1 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Employee Retirement Savings Plan

We sponsor a retirement savings plan for the majority of our employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and similar plans. The plans allow employees to contribute a portion of their pretax and post-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. The plans provide that we match a percentage of employee contributions up to certain limits. Employer matching contributions were $119 million, $102 million and $87 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 12 – Repurchases of Common Stock

2017 Stock Repurchase Program

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program completed on April 29, 2018.

92

The following table summarizes information regarding repurchases of our common stock under the 2017 Stock Repurchase Program:

(In millions, except shares and per share price)
Year ended December 31,Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Purchase Price
201816,738,758  $62.96  $1,054  
20177,010,889  63.34  444  
23,749,647  63.07  $1,498  

2018 Stock Repurchase Program

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and for up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our common stock through the year ending December 31, 2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no outstanding balance.repurchases of our common stock under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018.


We maintain vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we2018 Stock Repurchase Program, repurchases can obtain extended financing terms.be made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The interestspecific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other considerations. The 2018 Stock Repurchase Program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. Repurchased shares are retired.

Stock Purchases by Affiliate

In the first quarter of 2018, DT, our majority stockholder and an affiliated purchaser, purchased 3.3 million additional shares of our common stock at an aggregate market value of $200 million in the public market or from other parties, in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. There were 0 purchases in the remainder of 2018 and in 2019. We did not receive proceeds from these purchases.

Note 13 – Income Taxes

Our sources of Income before income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
U.S.$4,557  $3,686  $3,274  
Puerto Rico46  231  (113) 
Income before income taxes$4,603  $3,917  $3,161  

93

Income tax (expense) benefit is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Current tax benefit (expense)
Federal$24  $39  $—  
State(70) (63) (28) 
Puerto Rico (25) (1) 
Total current tax expense(44) (49) (29) 
Deferred tax benefit (expense)
Federal(954) (750) 1,182  
State(125) (160) 173  
Puerto Rico(12) (70) 49  
Total deferred tax (expense) benefit(1,091) (980) 1,404  
Total income tax (expense) benefit$(1,135) $(1,029) $1,375  

The reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate onand our effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %35.0 %
Effect of law and rate changes0.4  1.9  (68.9) 
Change in valuation allowance(1.8) (1.6) (11.4) 
State taxes, net of federal benefit5.1  4.8  4.8  
Equity-based compensation(0.6) (0.6) (2.4) 
Puerto Rico taxes, net of federal benefit0.3  2.4  (1.5) 
Permanent differences1.2  1.3  0.5  
Federal tax credits, net of reserves(0.8) (2.9) 0.3  
Other, net(0.1) —  0.1  
Effective income tax rate24.7 %26.3 %(43.5)%

Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, tax effected, are as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
Deferred tax assets
Loss carryforwards$823  $1,526  
Deferred rents—  784  
Lease liability3,403  —  
Reserves and accruals659  668  
Federal and state tax credits331  340  
Other903  620  
Deferred tax assets, gross6,119  3,938  
Valuation allowance(129) (210) 
Deferred tax assets, net5,990  3,728  
Deferred tax liabilities
Spectrum licenses5,902  5,494  
Property and equipment2,506  2,434  
Lease right-of-use assets2,881  —  
Other intangible assets19  40  
Other289  232  
Total deferred tax liabilities11,597  8,200  
Net deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  

94

As of December 31, 20162019, we have tax effected net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $470 million for federal income tax purposes and 2015, there was no outstanding balance.

Revolving Credit Facility$710 million for state income tax purposes, expiring through 2039. Federal NOLs and Standby Letters of Credit

We had an unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which allowed for up to $500 millioncertain state NOLs generated in borrowings. In December 2016, we terminated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom.and after 2018 do not expire. As of December 31, 2016, there2019, our tax effected federal and state NOL carryforwards for financial reporting purposes were no outstanding borrowings outstanding under this facility.approximately $138 million and $282 million, respectively, less than our NOL carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes, due to unrecognized tax benefits of the same amount. The unrecognized tax benefit amounts exclude indirect tax effects of $63 million in other jurisdictions.


In December 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. The applicable margin for the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 2.00% to 3.25% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. The applicable margin for the Secured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 1.00% to 1.75% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. As of December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under2019, we have available Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of $23 million. The AMT credits will be fully recovered by 2021. We also have research and development and foreign tax credit carryforwards with a combined value of $347 million for federal income tax purposes, which begin to expire in 2020.

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, our valuation allowance was $129 million, $210 million and $273 million, respectively. The change from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 primarily related to a reduction in the revolving credit facility.

Forvaluation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions resulting from legal entity reorganizations. The change from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018 primarily related to a reduction in the purposesvaluation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions from a change in tax status of securing our obligationscertain subsidiaries. We will continue to provide handset insurance services, we maintain an agreement for standby letters of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan Chase”). For purposes of securing our general purpose obligations, we maintain a letter of credit reimbursement agreement with Deutsche Bank.

The following table summarizesmonitor positive and negative evidence related to the outstanding standby letters of credit under each agreement:
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
JP Morgan Chase$20
 $36
Deutsche Bank54
 54
Total outstanding balance$74
 $90

Note 8 – Tower Obligations

In 2012, we conveyed to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 7,100 T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites (“CCI Tower Sites”) in exchange for net proceeds of $2.5 billion (“2012 Tower Transaction”). Rights to approximately 6,200utilization of the towerremaining deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance continues to be provided. It is possible that our valuation allowance may change within the next twelve months.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and in Puerto Rico. We are currently under examination by various states. Management does not believe the resolution of any of the audits will result in a material change to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The IRS has concluded its audits of our federal tax returns through the 2013 tax year; however, NOL and other carryforwards for certain audited periods remain open for examination. We are generally closed to U.S. federal, state and Puerto Rico examination for years prior to 2000.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$462  $412  $410  
Gross (decreases) increases to tax positions in prior periods(7)  (10) 
Gross increases due to current period business acquisitions—  10  —  
Gross increases to current period tax positions59  34  12  
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$514  $462  $412  

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had $367 million and $315 million, respectively, in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our annual effective tax rate. Penalties and interest on income tax assessments are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and Interest expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are insignificant.

95

Note 14 – Earnings Per Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)201920182017
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic3,468  2,888  4,481  
Add: Dividends related to mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  55  
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Effect of dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards9,289,760  8,546,022  9,200,873  
Mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  30,736,504  
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  
Earnings per share - basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Earnings per share - diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Potentially dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards16,359  148,422  33,980  

As of December 31, 2019, we had authorized 100 million shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share. There was 0 preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share if to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

96

Note 15 - Leases

Leases (Topic 842) Disclosures

Lessee

We are lessee for non-cancelable operating and financing leases for cell sites, were transferredswitch sites, retail stores and office facilities with contractual terms that generally extend through 2029. The majority of cell site leases have an initial non-cancelable term of five to CCI viaten years with several renewal options that can extend the lease term from five to thirty-five years. In addition, we have financing leases for network equipment that generally have a Master Prepaid Lease with sitenon-cancelable lease terms ranging from 23term of two to 37 years (“CCI Lease Sites”), whilefive years; the remaining tower sites were sold to CCI (“CCI Sales Sites”). CCI has fixed-pricefinancing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase options for these towers totaling approximately $2.0 billion, based on the estimated fair market valueoption at the end of the lease.

The components of lease term. Weexpense were as follows:
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating lease expense$2,558 
Financing lease expense:
Amortization of right-of-use assets523 
Interest on lease liabilities82 
Total financing lease expense605 
Variable lease expense243 
Total lease expense$3,406 

Information relating to the lease back space at certain tower sitesterm and discount rate is as follows:
December 31, 2019
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years)
Operating leases6
Financing leases3
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases4.8 %
Financing leases4.0 %

Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:
(in millions)Operating LeasesFinance Leases
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$2,754  $1,013  
20212,583  733  
20222,311  414  
20231,908  101  
20241,615  71  
Thereafter3,797  115  
Total lease payments14,968  2,447  
Less imputed interest2,142  144  
Total$12,826  $2,303  

Interest payments for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.financing leases for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $82 million.


In 2015, we conveyed to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”) the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 600 T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites (“PTI Tower Sites”) in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $140 million (“2015 Tower Transaction”). As of December 31, 2016, rights to approximately 200 of the tower2019, we have additional operating leases for cell sites remain operated by PTI under a management agreement (“PTI Managed Sites”). Weand commercial properties that have not yet commenced with future lease back space at certain tower sites for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.

Assets and liabilities associated with the operation of certain of the tower sites were transferred to SPEs. Assets included ground lease agreements or deeds for the land on which the towers are situated, the towers themselves and existing subleasing agreements with other mobile network operator tenants, who lease space at the tower sites. Liabilities included the obligation

to pay ground lease rentals, property taxes and other executory costs. Upon closing of the 2012 Tower Transaction, CCI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPEs containing CCI Sales Sites and an option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites at the end of their respective lease terms and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites. Upon closing of the 2015 Tower Transaction, PTI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPEs containing PTI Sales Sites and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites.

We determined the SPEs containing the CCI Lease Sites (“Lease Site SPEs”) are VIEs as the Company's equity investment lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. These activities include managing tenants and underlying ground leases, performing repair and maintenance on the towers, the obligation to absorb expected losses and the right to receive the expected future residual returns from the purchase option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites. As we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary and do not have a controlling financial interest in the Lease Site SPEs, the results of the Lease Site SPEs are not consolidated into our consolidated financial statements.
Due to our continuing involvement with the tower sites, we determined that we were precluded from applying sale-leaseback accounting. We recorded long-term financial obligations in the amount of the net proceeds received and recognized interest on the tower obligations at a ratepayments of approximately 8% for the 2012 Tower Transaction and 3% for the 2015 Tower Transaction using the effective interest method. The tower obligations are increased by interest expense and amortized through contractual leaseback payments made by us to CCI or PTI and through estimated future net cash flows generated and retained by CCI or PTI from operation$341 million.

As of the tower sites. Our historical tower site asset costs continue to be reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated.

The following table summarizes the impacts to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Property and equipment, net$485
 $601
Tower obligations2,621
 2,658

Future minimum payments related to the tower obligations are summarized below:
(in millions)Future Minimum Payments
Year Ending December 31, 
2017$184
2018184
2019184
2020185
2021185
Thereafter1,164
Total$2,086

We areDecember 31, 2019, we were contingently liable for future ground lease payments throughrelated to the remaining term of the CCI Lease Sites.tower obligations. These contingent obligations are not included in the above table as any amount due isthe amounts owed are contractually owed by CCI based on the subleasing arrangement. See Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies9 - Tower Obligations for further information.


97

Note 9 – Employee CompensationLessor

JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of 18 months and Benefit Plans

Under our 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), we are authorized to issueupgrade it for a new device up to 63 million sharesone time per month. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. The purchase price at the expiration of the lease is established at lease commencement and reflects the estimated residual value of the device, which reflects the estimated fair value of the underlying asset at the end of the lease term. The JUMP! On Demand leases do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Leased wireless devices are included in Property and equipment, net in our common stock. Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The components of leased wireless devices under our JUMP! On Demand program were as follows:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Leased wireless devices, gross$1,139  $1,159  
Accumulated depreciation(407) (622) 
Leased wireless devices, net$732  $537  

For equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices, see Note 10 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$417  
202199  
Total$516  

Leases (Topic 840) Disclosures

On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new lease standard using a modified-retrospective approach by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application and did not restate the prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements continue to be in accordance with the former lease standard, Topic 840 Leases. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

Operating Leases

Under the Incentive Plan,previous lease standard, we can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”),had non-cancelable operating leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants, advisors and non-employee directors.office facilities. As of December 31, 2016, there2018, these leases had contractual terms expiring through 2028, with the majority of cell site leases having an initial non-cancelable term of five to ten years with several renewal options. In addition, we had operating leases for dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms through 2027.

Our commitments under leases existing as of December 31, 2018 were 22 million sharesapproximately $2.7 billion for the year ending December 31, 2019, $4.7 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021, $3.3 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023 and $3.8 billion in total for years thereafter.

Total rent expense under operating leases, including dedicated transportation lines, was $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, and was classified as Cost of common stock availableservices and Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

98

Lessor

As of December 31, 2018, the future grants underminimum payments expected to be received over the Incentive Plan.

We grant RSUslease term related to eligible employees and certain non-employee directors and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to eligible key executives. RSUs entitle the grantee to receive shares of our common stockleased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of a vesting period of generally up to 3 years, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. PRSUs entitle the holder to receive shares of our common stock at the end of a vesting period of generally up to 3 years if the applicable performance goalslease term, are achieved and generally subject to continued employment through the vesting period. The number of shares ultimatelysummarized below:

(in millions)Total
Year Ended December 31,
2019$419  
202059  
Total$478  
received by the holder of PRSUs is dependent on our business performance against the specified performance goal(s) over a pre-established performance period. We also maintain an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”), under which eligible employees can purchase our common stock at a discounted price.

Stock-based compensation expense and related income tax benefits were as follows:
(in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
Stock-based compensation expense$235
 $201
 $196
Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation80
 71
 73
Realized excess tax benefit
 79
 34
Weighted average fair value per stock award granted45.07
 35.56
 28.52
Unrecognized compensation expense389
 327
 271
Weighted average period to be recognized (years)2.0
 2.0
 1.9
Fair value of stock awards vested354
 445
 209

Stock Awards

RSU and PRSU Awards

The following activity occurred under the RSU and PRSU awards:
(in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts)Number of Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Nonvested, December 31, 201516,334,271
 $29.95
 1.2 $639
Granted8,431,980
 45.07
    
Vested(7,712,463) 28.33
    
Forfeited(1,338,397) 34.42
    
Nonvested, December 31, 201615,715,391
 $37.93
 1.1 $904

Payment of the underlying shares in connection with the vesting of stock awards generally triggers a tax obligation for the employee, which is required to be remitted to the relevant tax authorities. We have agreed to withhold stock otherwise issuable under the award to cover certain of these tax obligations, with the net shares issued to the employee accounted for as outstanding common stock. We withheld 2,605,807 and 4,176,464 shares of stock to cover tax obligations associated with the payment of shares upon vesting of stock awards and remitted cash of $121 million and $156 million to the appropriate tax authorities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan


Our ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of our shares of common stock at a discounted price, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount. Employees can purchase stock at a 15% discount applied to the closing stock price on the first or last day of the six month-month offering period, whichever price is lower. The number of shares issued under our ESPP was 1,905,5342,091,650 and 761,0852,011,794 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the number of securities remaining available for future sale and issuance under the ESPP was 1,397,894.

Our ESPP provides for an annual increase in the aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for sale and authorized for issuance thereunder as of the first day of each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2016) equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”). For fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively.through 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that no such increase in shares of our common stock was necessary. However, an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock were automatically added to the ESPP share reserve as of January 1, 2020.


Stock Options


PriorStock options outstanding relate to the business combination, MetroPCS had established the MetroPCSMetro Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended and Restated MetroPCSMetro Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, and the Second Amended and Restated 1995Layer3 TV, Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (“Predecessor(collectively, the “Stock Option Plans”). Following stockholder approval of the Incentive Plan, noNo new awards have been or may be granted under the PredecessorStock Option Plans.



The following activity occurred under the PredecessorStock Option Plans:
SharesWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Outstanding at December 31, 2018284,811  $14.58  3.8
Exercised(85,083) 15.94  
Expired/canceled(4,786) 22.75  
Outstanding at December 31, 2019194,942  13.80  2.9
Exercisable at December 31, 2019180,966  13.48  2.6
 Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 20151,824,354
 $30.50
 2.7
Exercised(982,904) 29.34
  
Expired(7,519) 44.21
  
Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2016833,931
 $31.75
 2.3


Stock options exercised under the PredecessorStock Option Plans generated proceeds of approximately $29$1 million and $47$3 million for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


Employee Retirement Savings Plan


We sponsor a retirement savings plan for the majority of our employees under sectionSection 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and similar plans. The plans allow employees to contribute a portion of their pretax and post-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. The plans provide that we match a percentage of employee contributions up to certain limits. Employer matching contributions were $83$119 million, $73$102 million and $66$87 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Legacy Long Term Incentive Plan

Note 12 – Repurchases of Common Stock
Prior
2017 Stock Repurchase Program

On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program completed on April 29, 2018.

92

The following table summarizes information regarding repurchases of our common stock under the 2017 Stock Repurchase Program:

(In millions, except shares and per share price)
Year ended December 31,Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Purchase Price
201816,738,758  $62.96  $1,054  
20177,010,889  63.34  444  
23,749,647  63.07  $1,498  

2018 Stock Repurchase Program

On April 27, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the total stock repurchase program to $9.0 billion, consisting of the $1.5 billion in repurchases previously completed and for up to an additional $7.5 billion of repurchases of our long-term business strategy. As ofcommon stock through the year ending December 31, 2016, there2020 (the "2018 Stock Repurchase Program"). The additional $7.5 billion repurchase authorization is contingent upon the termination of the Business Combination Agreement and the abandonment of the transactions contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement. There were no LTIP awards outstanding and no new awards are expected to be grantedrepurchases of our common stock under the LTIP.2018 Stock Repurchase Program in 2019 or 2018.


Compensation expense reported within operating expenses relatedUnder the 2018 Stock Repurchase Program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The specific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other considerations. The 2018 Stock Repurchase Program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our LTIPdiscretion. Repurchased shares are retired.

Stock Purchases by Affiliate

In the first quarter of 2018, DT, our majority stockholder and payments to participants related toan affiliated purchaser, purchased 3.3 million additional shares of our LTIPcommon stock at an aggregate market value of $200 million in the public market or from other parties, in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. There were as follows:0 purchases in the remainder of 2018 and in 2019. We did not receive proceeds from these purchases.

(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
Compensation expense$
 $27
 $44
Payments52
 57
 60

Note 1013 – Income Taxes


Our sources of Income before income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
U.S.$4,557  $3,686  $3,274  
Puerto Rico46  231  (113) 
Income before income taxes$4,603  $3,917  $3,161  

93

 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
U.S.$2,286
 $898
 $347
Puerto Rico41
 80
 66
Income before income taxes$2,327
 $978
 $413


Income tax expense(expense) benefit is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Current tax benefit (expense)
Federal$24  $39  $—  
State(70) (63) (28) 
Puerto Rico (25) (1) 
Total current tax expense(44) (49) (29) 
Deferred tax benefit (expense)
Federal(954) (750) 1,182  
State(125) (160) 173  
Puerto Rico(12) (70) 49  
Total deferred tax (expense) benefit(1,091) (980) 1,404  
Total income tax (expense) benefit$(1,135) $(1,029) $1,375  
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Current tax expense (benefit)     
Federal$(66) $(30) $
State29
 2
 6
Puerto Rico(10) 17
 38
Total current tax expense (benefit)(47) (11) 44
Deferred tax expense (benefit)     
Federal804
 281
 79
State96
 (37) 40
Puerto Rico14
 12
 3
Total deferred tax expense914
 256
 122
Total income tax expense$867
 $245
 $166


The reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %35.0 %
Effect of law and rate changes0.4  1.9  (68.9) 
Change in valuation allowance(1.8) (1.6) (11.4) 
State taxes, net of federal benefit5.1  4.8  4.8  
Equity-based compensation(0.6) (0.6) (2.4) 
Puerto Rico taxes, net of federal benefit0.3  2.4  (1.5) 
Permanent differences1.2  1.3  0.5  
Federal tax credits, net of reserves(0.8) (2.9) 0.3  
Other, net(0.1) —  0.1  
Effective income tax rate24.7 %26.3 %(43.5)%
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Federal statutory income tax rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State taxes, net of federal benefit4.0
 (1.1) (8.8)
Puerto Rico taxes, net of federal benefit
 3.3
 5.0
Change in valuation allowance1.0
 (3.2) 18.8
Permanent differences0.6
 1.6
 1.4
Federal tax credits, net of reserves(0.5) (9.5) (10.6)
Equity-based compensation(2.2) 
 
Other, net(0.6) (1.0) (0.6)
Effective income tax rate37.3 % 25.1 % 40.2 %


Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, tax effected, are as follows:
(in millions)December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
Deferred tax assets
Loss carryforwards$823  $1,526  
Deferred rents—  784  
Lease liability3,403  —  
Reserves and accruals659  668  
Federal and state tax credits331  340  
Other903  620  
Deferred tax assets, gross6,119  3,938  
Valuation allowance(129) (210) 
Deferred tax assets, net5,990  3,728  
Deferred tax liabilities
Spectrum licenses5,902  5,494  
Property and equipment2,506  2,434  
Lease right-of-use assets2,881  —  
Other intangible assets19  40  
Other289  232  
Total deferred tax liabilities11,597  8,200  
Net deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Deferred tax liabilities$5,607  $4,472  

94

(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Deferred tax assets   
Loss carryforwards$1,442
 $1,997
Deferred rents1,153
 1,136
Reserves and accruals1,058
 928
Federal and state tax credits284
 349
Debt fair market value adjustment83
 97
Other430
 317
Deferred tax assets, gross4,450
 4,824
Valuation allowance(573) (583)
Deferred tax assets, net3,877
 4,241
Deferred tax liabilities   
Spectrum licenses6,952
 6,174
Property and equipment1,732
 1,950
Other intangible assets119
 178
Other12
 
Total deferred tax liabilities8,815
 8,302
Net deferred tax liabilities$4,938
 $4,061
    
Classified on the balance sheet as:   
Deferred tax liabilities$4,938
 $4,061


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we have tax effected net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards tax effected, of $1.1 billion$470 million for federal income tax purposes and $689$710 million for state income tax purposes, expiring through 2036.2039. Federal NOLs and certain state NOLs generated in and after 2018 do not expire. As of December 31, 2016,2019, our tax effected federal and state NOL carryforwards for financial reporting purposes were approximately $204$138 million and $167$282 million, respectively, tax effected, less than our NOL carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes, due to unrecognized tax benefits of the same amount. The unrecognized tax benefit amounts exclude indirect tax effects of $63 million in other jurisdictions.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we have available Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of $89 million, which may$23 million. The AMT credits will be used to reduce regular federal income taxes and have no expiration.fully recovered by 2021. We also have research and development and foreign tax credit carryforwards with a combined value of $174$347 million for federal income tax purposes, which begin to expire in 2018.2020.


As of December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, our valuation allowance was $573$129 million, $210 million and $583$273 million, respectively. The change from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 primarily related to a reduction in the valuation allowance of $10 million isagainst deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions resulting from legal entity reorganizations. The change from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018 primarily related to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 and the related release of a $33 millionreduction in the valuation allowance on stock option deductions includedagainst deferred tax assets in NOL carryforwards, partially offset by 2016 activitycertain state jurisdictions from a change in tax status of certain subsidiaries. We will continue to monitor positive and negative evidence related to statethe utilization of the remaining deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance exists. Based on recent earnings in certain jurisdictions, sufficient positive evidencecontinues to be provided. It is possible that our valuation allowance may existchange within the next twelve months such that we may release a portion of our valuation allowance.months.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and in Puerto Rico. We are currently under examination by various states. Management does not believe the resolution of any of the audits will result in a material change to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The IRS has concluded its audits of our federal tax returns through the 2013 tax year,year; however, NOL and other carryforwards for certain audited periods remain open for examination. We are generally closed to U.S. federal, state and Puerto Rico examination for years prior to 1998.2000.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014(in millions)201920182017
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$411
 $388
 $178
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$462  $412  $410  
Gross decreases to tax positions in prior periods(5) (112) (52)
Gross (decreases) increases to tax positions in prior periodsGross (decreases) increases to tax positions in prior periods(7)  (10) 
Gross increases due to current period business acquisitionsGross increases due to current period business acquisitions—  10  —  
Gross increases to current period tax positions4
 135
 262
Gross increases to current period tax positions59  34  12  
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$410
 $411
 $388
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$514  $462  $412  


As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we had $168$367 million and $163$315 million, respectively, in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our annual effective tax rate. Penalties and interest on income tax assessments are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and Interest expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income. The accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are insignificant.



95

Note 1114 – Earnings Per Share


The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)201920182017
Net income$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic3,468  2,888  4,481  
Add: Dividends related to mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  55  
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,468  $2,888  $4,536  
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic854,143,751  849,744,152  831,850,073  
Effect of dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards9,289,760  8,546,022  9,200,873  
Mandatory convertible preferred stock—  —  30,736,504  
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted863,433,511  858,290,174  871,787,450  
Earnings per share - basic$4.06  $3.40  $5.39  
Earnings per share - diluted$4.02  $3.36  $5.20  
Potentially dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards16,359  148,422  33,980  
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)2016 2015 2014
Net income$1,460
 $733
 $247
Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock(55) (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted$1,405
 $678
 $247
      
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic822,470,275
 812,994,028
 805,284,712
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards10,584,270
 9,623,910
 8,893,887
Mandatory convertible preferred stock
 
 1,743,659
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted833,054,545
 822,617,938
 815,922,258
      
Earnings per share - basic$1.71
 $0.83
 $0.31
Earnings per share - diluted$1.69
 $0.82
 $0.30
      
Potentially dilutive securities:     
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards3,528,683
 4,842,370
 1,426,331
Mandatory convertible preferred stock32,237,266
 32,237,266
 


As of December 31, 2019, we had authorized 100 million shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share. There was 0 preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share if to do so would have been anti-dilutive.


96

Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies15 - Leases


CommitmentsLeases (Topic 842) Disclosures


Operating Leases and Purchase CommitmentsLessee


Future minimum paymentsWe are lessee for non-cancelable operating leases and purchase commitments are summarized below:
(in millions)Operating Leases Purchase Commitments
Year Ending December 31,   
2017$2,417
 $2,011
20182,118
 977
20191,832
 841
20201,511
 704
20211,102
 626
Thereafter2,188
 960
Total$11,168
 $6,119

Operating Leases

We have operatingfinancing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores and office facilities with contractual terms expiringthat generally extend through 2026.

2029. The majority of cell site leases have an initial non-cancelable term of five years to ten years with several renewal options. Historically, our assessmentoptions that can extend the lease term from five to thirty-five years. In addition, we have financing leases for network equipment that generally have a non-cancelable lease term of cell site lease terms includedtwo to five years; the financing leases do not have renewal options on certain cell siteand contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease.

The components of lease expense were as follows:
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating lease expense$2,558 
Financing lease expense:
Amortization of right-of-use assets523 
Interest on lease liabilities82 
Total financing lease expense605 
Variable lease expense243 
Total lease expense$3,406 

Information relating to the lease term and discount rate is as follows:
December 31, 2019
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years)
Operating leases6
Financing leases3
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases4.8 %
Financing leases4.0 %

Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:
(in millions)Operating LeasesFinance Leases
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$2,754  $1,013  
20212,583  733  
20222,311  414  
20231,908  101  
20241,615  71  
Thereafter3,797  115  
Total lease payments14,968  2,447  
Less imputed interest2,142  144  
Total$12,826  $2,303  

Interest payments for financing leases whichfor the year ended December 31, 2019, were reasonably assured of exercise and we had included such renewal options in the future minimum lease payments presented in the Operating Lease and Purchase Commitments table, above. $82 million.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we have updated the future minimum lease payments for all cell site leases presented above to include only payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term as they represent the payments which we cannot avoid at our option and also correspond to our lease term assessment for new leases. This update had the effect of reducing our contractual operating lease commitments included in the table above by $4.6

billion as of December 31, 2016.

In addition, we haveadditional operating leases for dedicated transportation linescell sites and commercial properties that have not yet commenced with varying expiration terms through 2026.future lease payments of approximately $341 million.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we were contingently liable for future ground lease payments related to the tower obligations. These contingent obligations are not included in the above table as the amounts dueowed are contractually owed by CCI based on the subleasing arrangement. See Note 8 –9 - Tower Obligations for further information.


97

Lessor

JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. The purchase price at the expiration of the lease is established at lease commencement and reflects the estimated residual value of the device, which reflects the estimated fair value of the underlying asset at the end of the lease term. The JUMP! On Demand leases do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Leased wireless devices are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The components of leased wireless devices under our JUMP! On Demand program were as follows:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Leased wireless devices, gross$1,139  $1,159  
Accumulated depreciation(407) (622) 
Leased wireless devices, net$732  $537  

For equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices, see Note 10 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Twelve Months Ending December 31,
2020$417  
202199  
Total$516  

Leases (Topic 840) Disclosures

On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new lease standard using a modified-retrospective approach by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application and did not restate the prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, prior periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements continue to be in accordance with the former lease standard, Topic 840 Leases. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.

Operating Leases

Under the previous lease standard, we had non-cancelable operating leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores and office facilities. As of December 31, 2018, these leases had contractual terms expiring through 2028, with the majority of cell site leases having an initial non-cancelable term of five to ten years with several renewal options. In addition, we had operating leases for dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms through 2027.

Our commitments under leases existing as of December 31, 2018 were approximately $2.7 billion for the year ending December 31, 2019, $4.7 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021, $3.3 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023 and $3.8 billion in total for years thereafter.

Total rent expense under operating leases, including dedicated transportation lines, was $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.0 billion for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, and 2014, respectively, and iswas classified as Cost of services and Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income.


98

Lessor

As of December 31, 2018, the future minimum payments expected to be received over the lease term related to the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease term, are summarized below:
(in millions)Total
Year Ended December 31,
2019$419  
202059  
Total$478  

Capital Leases

Within property and equipment, wireless communications systems include capital lease agreements for network equipment with varying expiration terms through 2033. Capital lease assets and accumulated amortization were $3.1 billion and $867 million as of December 31, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, the future minimum payments required under capital leases, including interest and maintenance, over their remaining terms are summarized below:
(in millions)Future Minimum Payments
Year Ended December 31,
2019$909  
2020631  
2021389  
2022102  
202366  
Thereafter106  
Total$2,203  
Included in Total
Interest$143  
Maintenance45  

Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments


We have commitments for non-dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms that generally extend through 2028.2035. In addition, we have commitments to purchase and lease spectrum licenses, handsets,wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business, with various terms through 2028.2043. These amounts are not reflective of our entire anticipated purchases under the related agreements but are determined based on the non-cancelable quantities or termination amounts to which we are contractually obligated.


Related-Party CommitmentsOur purchase commitments are approximately $3.6 billion for the year ending December 31, 2020, $3.3 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2021 and 2022, $1.6 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2023 and 2024 and $1.4 billion in total for the years thereafter.


In 2016,2018, we signed a reciprocal long-term spectrum lease with Sprint. The lease includes an offsetting amount to be received from Sprint for the lease of our spectrum. Lease payments began in the fourth quarter of 2018. The minimum commitment under this lease as of December 31, 2019, is $481 million and is included in the purchase obligations above. The reciprocal long-term lease is a distinct transaction from the Merger.

Under the previous lease standard certain of our network backhaul arrangements were accounted for as operating leases. Obligations under these agreements were included within our operating lease commitments as of December 31, 2018.

99

These agreements no longer qualify as leases under the new lease standard. Our commitments under these agreements as of December 31, 2019, were approximately $164 million for the year ending December 31, 2020, $267 million in total for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, $171 million in total for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, and $196 million in total for years thereafter. The commitments under these agreements are included in the purchase commitments above.

Interest rate lock derivatives
We have entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. These interest rate lock derivatives were designated as cash flow hedges to reduce variability in cash flows due to changes in interest payments attributable to increases or decreases in the benchmark interest rate during the period leading up to the probable issuance of fixed-rate debt. The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives as of December 31, 2019, was a liability of $1.2 billion and is included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements for further information.

Renewable Energy Purchase Agreements
In April 2019, T-Mobile USA entered into three purchase agreements with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom certain Senior Notes. The purchase agreements were amended in October 2016. See Note 7 – Debt for further information.

In January 2017, T-Mobile USA borrowed $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facilityRenewable Energy Purchase Agreement (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”REPA”) with Deutsche Telekoma third party that is based on the expected operation of a solar photovoltaic electrical generation facility located in Texas and will remain in effect until the fifteenth anniversary of the facility’s entry into commercial operation. Commercial operation of the facility is expected to refinance $1.98 billionoccur in July 2021. The REPA consists of outstanding secured term loansan energy forward agreement that is net settled based on energy prices and the energy output generated by the facility. We have determined that the REPA does not meet the definition of a derivative because the expected energy output of the facility may not be reliably estimated (the arrangement lacks a notional amount). The REPA does not contain any unconditional purchase obligations because amounts under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceedsagreement are not fixed and determinable. Our participation in the REPA did not require an upfront investment or capital commitment. We do not control the activities that most significantly impact the energy-generating facility, nor do we direct the use of, or receive specific energy output from, the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt. The loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches on January 31, 2017 (i) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and will mature on November 9, 2022 and (ii) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% and will mature on January 31, 2024. The Incremental Term Loan Facility increases Deutsche Telekom’s incremental term loan commitment provided to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016 from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provides to T-Mobile USA an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment. See Note 14 – Subsequent Events for further information.facility.

In December 2016, T-Mobile USA also entered into a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion senior secured revolving credit agreement. As of December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. See Note 7 – Debt for further information.


Contingencies and Litigation


Litigation Matters

On June 11, 2019, a number of state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against us, DT, Sprint, and SoftBank in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Merger, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and so should be enjoined. The trial concluded after two weeks of witness testimony and presentation of document evidence. We are now waiting for the trial court’s ruling. See Note 2 – Business Combinationsfor further information.

In addition to the litigation associated with the Transactions discussed above, we are involved in various lawsuits and disputes, claims, government agency investigations and enforcement actions, and other proceedings (“Litigation Matters”) that arise in the ordinary course of business, which include numerous court actions alleging that we are infringing various patents. Virtually allclaims of the patent infringement cases(most of which are broughtasserted by non-practicing entities primarily seeking monetary damages), class actions, and effectively seek only monetary damages, although they occasionally seek injunctive relief as well.proceedings to enforce FCC rules and regulations. The Litigation Matters described above have progressed to various stages and some of them may proceed to trial, arbitration, hearing or other adjudication that could include an awardresult in fines, penalties, or awards of monetary or injunctive relief in the coming 12 months if they are not otherwise resolved. We have established an accrual with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, which is reflected in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements but that we dois not consider,considered to be, individually or in the aggregate, material. An accrual is established when we believe it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. For other matters, where we have not determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we have not recorded an accrual due to various factors typical in contested proceedings, including but not limited to:to uncertainty concerning legal theories and their resolution by courts or regulators;regulators, uncertain damage theories and demands;demands, and a less than fully developed factual record. While we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, an unfavorable outcome of some or all of these proceedings could have a material adverse impact on results of operations or cash flows for a particular period. This

assessment is based on our current understanding of relevant facts and circumstances. As such, our view of these matters is subject to inherent uncertainties and may change in the future.


100

Note 1317 – Additional Financial Information


Supplemental Consolidated Balance Sheets Information


Allowances and Imputed Discount

The following table summarizes the changes in allowances and unamortized imputed discount related to our current accounts receivables and EIP receivables:
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Allowances, beginning of year$264
 $199
 $169
Bad debt expense477
 547
 444
Write-offs, net of recoveries(518) (482) (414)
Allowances, end of year$223
 $264
 $199
      
Imputed discount, beginning of year$159
 $271
 $212
Additions362
 310
 380
Interest income(248) (414) (355)
Cancellations and other(47) (78) (92)
Impacts from sales of EIP receivables(152) (55) 
Transfer from long-term100
 125
 126
Imputed discount, end of year$174
 $159
 $271

The following table summarizes the changes in unamortized imputed discount related to our long-term EIP receivables:
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Imputed discount, beginning of year$26
 $61
 $64
Additions134
 111
 141
Cancellations and other(15) (13) (18)
Impacts from sales of EIP receivables(24) (8) 
Transfer to current(100) (125) (126)
Imputed discount, end of year$21
 $26
 $61

See Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables on sales of EIP receivables and Note 2 – Equipment Installment Plan Receivables on EIP receivables and related unamortized imputed discount and allowance for credit losses for further information.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities


Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are summarized as follows:
(in millions)December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Accounts payable$4,322  $5,487  
Payroll and related benefits802  709  
Property and other taxes, including payroll682  642  
Interest227  227  
Commissions251  243  
Network decommissioning—  65  
Toll and interconnect156  157  
Advertising127  76  
Other179  135  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$6,746  $7,741  
(in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Accounts payable$5,163
 $6,137
Payroll and related benefits559
 521
Property and other taxes, including payroll525
 494
Interest423
 371
Commissions159
 190
Network decommissioning101
 117
Toll and interconnect85
 68
Advertising44
 77
Other93
 109
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$7,152
 $8,084



Book overdrafts included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities were $356$463 million and $501$630 million as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

Other

In June 2016, we made a refundable deposit of $2.2 billion to a third party in connection with a potential asset purchase. The deposit is included in Asset purchase deposit in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During the quarter ended and subsequent to September 30, 2016, a handset Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) announced recalls on certain of its smartphone devices. As a result, we recorded no revenue associated with the device sales to customers and impaired the devices to their net realizable value. The OEM has agreed to reimburse T-Mobile, as such, we have recorded an amount due from the OEM as an offset to the loss recorded in Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and a reduction to Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Information


Related Party Transactions


We have related party transactions associated with Deutsche TelekomDT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, which are included in the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


The following table summarizes the impact of significant transactions with Deutsche TelekomDT or its affiliates included in operatingOperating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income:Income:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)201920182017
Discount related to roaming expenses$(9) $—  $—  
Fees incurred for use of the T-Mobile brand88  84  79  
Expenses for telecommunications and IT services—  —  12  
International long distance agreement39  36  55  
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2016 2015 2014
Discount related to roaming expenses$(15) $(21) $(61)
Fees incurred for use of the T-Mobile brand74
 65
 60
Expenses for telecommunications and IT services25
 23
 24
International long distance agreement60
 
 


We have an agreement with Deutsche TelekomDT for the reimbursement of certain administrative expenses, which were $11 million and $2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015, respectively. There were no reimbursements for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.


Supplemental Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity Information

Preferred Stock

In 2014, we completed a public offering of 20 million shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock for net proceeds of $982 million. Dividends on the preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when and if declared by our board of directors at an annual rate of 5.5%. The dividends may be paid in cash, shares of common stock, subject to certain limitations, or any combination of cash and shares of common stock.

Unless converted earlier, each share of preferred stock will convert automatically on December 15, 2017 into between 1.6119 and 1.9342 shares of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, depending on the applicable market value of the common stock. At any time, the preferred shares may be converted, in whole or in part, at the minimum conversion rate of 1.6119 shares of common stock, except during a fundamental change conversion period. In addition, holders may be entitled to shares based on the amount of accumulated and unpaid dividends. If certain fundamental changes involving the Company occur, the preferred stock may be converted into common shares at the applicable conversion rate, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, and holders will also be entitled to a make-whole amount. The preferred stock ranks senior with respect to liquidation preference and dividend rights to common stock. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, winding-up or dissolution of the Company, each holder of preferred stock will be entitled to receive a liquidation preference in the amount of $50 per share, plus an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends, after satisfaction of liabilities to our creditors and before any distribution or payment is made to any holders of common stock. The preferred stock is not redeemable.


Note 14 – Subsequent Events

In January 2017, we delivered a notice of redemption on $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of our 6.625% Senior Notes due 2020.  The notes were redeemed on February 10, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 102.208% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon).

In January 2017, T-Mobile USA borrowed $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”) with Deutsche Telekom to refinance $1.98 billion of outstanding secured term loans under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt. The loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches on January 31, 2017 (i) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and will mature on November 9, 2022 and (ii) $2.0 billion of which will bear interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% and will mature on January 31, 2024. The Incremental Term Loan Facility increases Deutsche Telekom’s incremental term loan commitment provided to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016 from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provides to T-Mobile USA an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment.

In February 2017, we delivered a notice of redemption on $500 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.250% Senior Notes due 2018.  The notes will be redeemed on March 6, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 101.313% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon).

Note 1518 – Guarantor Financial Information


Pursuant to the applicable indentures and supplemental indentures, the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties excluding Senior Secured Term Loans and capital leases, issued by T-Mobile USA (“Issuer”) is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by T-Mobile (“Parent”) and certain of the Issuer’s 100% owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”).

In April 2016, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued $1.0 billion of public 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.


The guarantees of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are subject to release in limited circumstances only upon the occurrence of certain customary conditions. The indentures and credit facilities governing the long-term debt contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to:to incur more debt;debt, pay dividends and make distributions;distributions, make certain investments;investments, repurchase stock;stock, create liens or other encumbrances;encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates;affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries;subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and the supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of the indentures and the supplemental indentures.


101

On October 23, 2018, SLMA LLC was formed as a limited liability company in Delaware to serve as an escrow subsidiary to facilitate the contemplated issuance of notes by Parent in connection with the Transactions. SLMA LLC is an indirect, 100% owned finance subsidiary of Parent, as such term is used in Rule 3-10(b) of Regulation S-X, and has been designated as an unrestricted subsidiary under the Issuer’s existing debt securities. Any debt securities that may be issued from time to time by SLMA LLC will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Parent.

In 2019, certain Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries became Guarantor Subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Presented below is the condensed consolidating financial information as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2016
102

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets           
Cash and cash equivalents$358
 $2,733
 $2,342
 $67
 $
 $5,500
Accounts receivable, net
 
 1,675
 221
 
 1,896
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
 
 1,930
 
 
 1,930
Accounts receivable from affiliates
 
 40
 
 
 40
Inventories
 
 1,111
 
 
 1,111
Asset purchase deposit
 
 2,203
 
 
 2,203
Other current assets
 
 972
 565
 
 1,537
Total current assets358
 2,733
 10,273
 853
 
 14,217
Property and equipment, net (1)

 
 20,568
 375
 
 20,943
Goodwill
 
 1,683
 
 
 1,683
Spectrum licenses
 
 27,014
 
 
 27,014
Other intangible assets, net
 
 376
 
 
 376
Investments in subsidiaries, net17,682
 35,095
 
 
 (52,777) 
Intercompany receivables196
 6,826
 
 
 (7,022) 
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
 
 984
 
 
 984
Other assets
 7
 600
 262
 (195) 674
Total assets$18,236
 $44,661
 $61,498
 $1,490
 $(59,994) $65,891
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity           
Current liabilities           
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$
 $423
 $6,474
 $255
 $
 $7,152
Payables to affiliates
 79
 46
 
 
 125
Short-term debt
 20
 334
 
 
 354
Deferred revenue
 
 986
 
 
 986
Other current liabilities
 
 258
 147
 
 405
Total current liabilities
 522
 8,098
 402
 
 9,022
Long-term debt
 20,741
 1,091
 
 
 21,832
Long-term debt to affiliates
 5,600
 
 
 
 5,600
Tower obligations (1)

 
 400
 2,221
 
 2,621
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 5,133
 
 (195) 4,938
Deferred rent expense
 
 2,616
 
 
 2,616
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net
 
 568
 
 (568) 
Intercompany payables
 
 6,785
 237
 (7,022) 
Other long-term liabilities
 116
 906
 4
 
 1,026
 Total long-term liabilities
 26,457
 17,499
 2,462
 (7,785) 38,633
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)18,236
 17,682
 35,901
 (1,374) (52,209) 18,236
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$18,236
 $44,661
 $61,498
 $1,490
 $(59,994) $65,891

(1)
Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations for further information.



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 20152019
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1,350  $172  $—  $1,528  
Accounts receivable, net—  —  1,616  272  —  1,888  
Equipment installment plan receivables, net—  —  2,600  —  —  2,600  
Accounts receivable from affiliates—  —  20  —  —  20  
Inventory—  —  964  —  —  964  
Other current assets—  646  975  684  —  2,305  
Total current assets 647  7,525  1,128  —  9,305  
Property and equipment, net (1)
—  —  21,790  194  —  21,984  
Operating lease right-of-use assets—  —  10,933  —  —  10,933  
Financing lease right-of-use assets—  —  2,715  —  —  2,715  
Goodwill—  —  1,930  —  —  1,930  
Spectrum licenses—  —  36,465  —  —  36,465  
Other intangible assets, net—  —  115  —  —  115  
Investments in subsidiaries, net28,898  51,306  —  —  (80,204) —  
Intercompany receivables and note receivables—  3,464  —  —  (3,464) —  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net—  —  1,583  —  —  1,583  
Other assets—  18  1,797  239  (163) 1,891  
Total assets$28,903  $55,435  $84,853  $1,561  $(83,831) $86,921  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$—  $252  $6,236  $258  $—  $6,746  
Payables to affiliates—  145  42  —  —  187  
Short-term debt—  25  —  —  —  25  
Deferred revenue—  —  631  —  —  631  
Short-term operating lease liabilities—  —  2,287  —  —  2,287  
Short-term financing lease liabilities—  —  957  —  —  957  
Other current liabilities—  1,171  139  363  —  1,673  
Total current liabilities—  1,593  10,292  621  —  12,506  
Long-term debt—  10,958  —  —  —  10,958  
Long-term debt to affiliates—  13,986  —  —  —  13,986  
Tower obligations (1)
—  —  75  2,161  —  2,236  
Deferred tax liabilities—  —  5,770  —  (163) 5,607  
Operating lease liabilities—  —  10,539  —  —  10,539  
Financing lease liabilities—  —  1,346  —  —  1,346  
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net—  —  864  —  (864) —  
Intercompany payables and debt114  —  2,968  382  (3,464) —  
Other long-term liabilities—  —  937  17  —  954  
Total long-term liabilities114  24,944  22,499  2,560  (4,491) 45,626  
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)28,789  28,898  52,062  (1,620) (79,340) 28,789  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$28,903  $55,435  $84,853  $1,561  $(83,831) $86,921  
(1)Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations for further information.

103

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets           
Cash and cash equivalents$378
 $1,767
 $2,364
 $73
 $
 $4,582
Short-term investments
 1,999
 999
 
 
 2,998
Accounts receivable, net
 
 1,574
 214
 
 1,788
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
 
 2,378
 
 
 2,378
Accounts receivable from affiliates
 
 36
 
 
 36
Inventories
 
 1,295
 
 
 1,295
Other current assets
 
 1,413
 400
 
 1,813
Total current assets378
 3,766
 10,059
 687
 
 14,890
Property and equipment, net (1)

 
 19,546
 454
 
 20,000
Goodwill
 
 1,683
 
 
 1,683
Spectrum licenses
 
 23,955
 
 
 23,955
Other intangible assets, net
 
 594
 
 
 594
Investments in subsidiaries, net16,184
 32,280
 
 
 (48,464) 
Intercompany receivables
 6,130
 
 
 (6,130) 
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
 
 847
 
 
 847
Other assets
 5
 387
 219
 (167) 444
Total assets$16,562
 $42,181
 $57,071
 $1,360
 $(54,761) $62,413
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity           
Current liabilities           
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$
 $368
 $7,496
 $220
 $
 $8,084
Payables to affiliates
 70
 65
 
 
 135
Short-term debt
 20
 162
 
 
 182
Deferred revenue
 
 717
 
 
 717
Other current liabilities
 
 327
 83
 
 410
Total current liabilities
 458
 8,767
 303
 
 9,528
Long-term debt
 19,797
 664
 
 
 20,461
Long-term debt to affiliates
 5,600
 
 
 
 5,600
Tower obligations (1)

 
 411
 2,247
 
 2,658
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 4,228
 
 (167) 4,061
Deferred rent expense
 
 2,481
 
 
 2,481
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net
 
 628
 
 (628) 
Intercompany payables5
 
 5,959
 166
 (6,130) 
Other long-term liabilities
 142
 922
 3
 
 1,067
 Total long-term liabilities5
 25,539
 15,293
 2,416
 (6,925) 36,328
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)16,557
 16,184
 33,011
 (1,359) (47,836) 16,557
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$16,562
 $42,181
 $57,071
 $1,360
 $(54,761) $62,413
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information

December 31, 2018
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents  $ $ $1,082  $118  $—  $1,203  
Accounts receivable, net  —  —  1,510  259  —  1,769  
Equipment installment plan receivables, net  —  —  2,538  —  —  2,538  
Accounts receivable from affiliates  —  —  11  —  —  11  
Inventory  —  —  1,084  —  —  1,084  
Other current assets  —  —  1,032  644  —  1,676  
Total current assets  7,257  1,021  —  8,281  
Property and equipment, net (1)
—  —  23,113  246  —  23,359  
Goodwill—  —  1,901  —  —  1,901  
Spectrum licenses—  —  35,559  —  —  35,559  
Other intangible assets, net—  —  198  —  —  198  
Investments in subsidiaries, net25,314  46,516  —  —  (71,830) —  
Intercompany receivables and note receivables—  5,174  —  —  (5,174) —  
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net—  —  1,547  —  —  1,547  
Other assets—   1,540  217  (141) 1,623  
Total assets$25,316  $51,698  $71,115  $1,484  $(77,145) $72,468  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$—  $228  $7,263  $250  $—  $7,741  
Payables to affiliates—  157  43  —  —  200  
Short-term debt—  —  841  —  —  841  
Deferred revenue—  —  698  —  —  698  
Other current liabilities—  447  164  176  —  787  
Total current liabilities—  832  9,009  426  —  10,267  
Long-term debt—  10,950  1,174  —  —  12,124  
Long-term debt to affiliates—  14,582  —  —  —  14,582  
Tower obligations (1)
—  —  384  2,173  —  2,557  
Deferred tax liabilities—  —  4,613  —  (141) 4,472  
Deferred rent expense—  —  2,781  —  —  2,781  
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net—  —  676  —  (676) —  
Intercompany payables and debt598  —  4,258  318  (5,174) —  
Other long-term liabilities—  20  926  21  —  967  
Total long-term liabilities598  25,552  14,812  2,512  (5,991) 37,483  
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)24,718  25,314  47,294  (1,454) (71,154) 24,718  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$25,316  $51,698  $71,115  $1,484  $(77,145) $72,468  
(1)Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations for further information.
(1)
Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations for further information.







104

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 20162019
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Revenues
Service revenues$—  $—  $32,268  $3,003  $(1,277) $33,994  
Equipment revenues—  —  10,053   (216) 9,840  
Other revenues—  19  1,109  203  (167) 1,164  
Total revenues—  19  43,430  3,209  (1,660) 44,998  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  6,733  —  (111) 6,622  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  10,908  1,207  (216) 11,899  
Selling, general and administrative—  16  14,467  989  (1,333) 14,139  
Depreciation and amortization—  —  6,564  52  —  6,616  
Total operating expense—  16  38,672  2,248  (1,660) 39,276  
Operating income—   4,758  961  —  5,722  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense—  (454) (88) (185) —  (727) 
Interest expense to affiliates—  (409) (20) —  21  (408) 
Interest income—  22  20   (21) 24  
Other (expense) income, net—  (13)  (1) —  (8) 
Total other expense, net—  (854) (82) (183) —  (1,119) 
Income (loss) before income taxes—  (851) 4,676  778  —  4,603  
Income tax expense—  —  (965) (170) —  (1,135) 
Earnings of subsidiaries3,468  4,319  31  —  (7,818) —  
Net income$3,468  $3,468  $3,742  $608  $(7,818) $3,468  
Net income$3,468  $3,468  $3,742  $608  $(7,818) $3,468  
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(536) (536) 186  —  350  (536) 
Total comprehensive income$2,932  $2,932  $3,928  $608  $(7,468) $2,932  

105

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Revenues           
Service revenues$
 $
 $26,613
 $2,023
 $(792) $27,844
Equipment revenues
 
 9,145
 
 (418) 8,727
Other revenues
 3
 491
 195
 (18) 671
Total revenues
 3
 36,249
 2,218
 (1,228) 37,242
Operating expenses           
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
 
 5,707
 24
 
 5,731
Cost of equipment sales
 
 10,209
 1,027
 (417) 10,819
Selling, general and administrative
 
 11,321
 868
 (811) 11,378
Depreciation and amortization
 
 6,165
 78
 
 6,243
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
 
 104
 
 
 104
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
 
 (835) 
 
 (835)
Total operating expenses
 
 32,671
 1,997
 (1,228) 33,440
Operating income
 3
 3,578
 221
 
 3,802
Other income (expense)           
Interest expense
 (1,147) (82) (189) 
 (1,418)
Interest expense to affiliates
 (312) 
 
 
 (312)
Interest income
 31
 230
 
 
 261
Other income (expense), net
 2
 (8) 
 
 (6)
Total other income (expense), net
 (1,426) 140
 (189) 
 (1,475)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (1,423) 3,718
 32
 
 2,327
Income tax expense
 
 (857) (10) 
 (867)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries1,460
 2,883
 (17) 
 (4,326) 
Net income1,460
 1,460
 2,844
 22
 (4,326) 1,460
Dividends on preferred stock(55) 
 
 
 
 (55)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,405
 $1,460
 $2,844
 $22
 $(4,326) $1,405
            
Net Income$1,460
 $1,460
 $2,844
 $22
 $(4,326) $1,460
Other comprehensive income, net of tax           
Other comprehensive income, net of tax2
 2
 2
 2
 (6) 2
Total comprehensive income$1,462
 $1,462
 $2,846
 $24
 $(4,332) $1,462


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 20152018
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Revenues
Service revenues$—  $—  $30,637  $2,333  $(978) $31,992  
Equipment revenues—  —  10,209   (201) 10,009  
Other revenues—  29  1,113  228  (61) 1,309  
Total revenues—  29  41,959  2,562  (1,240) 43,310  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  6,283  24  —  6,307  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  11,239  1,010  (202) 12,047  
Selling, general and administrative—  11  13,296  892  (1,038) 13,161  
Depreciation and amortization—  —  6,422  64  —  6,486  
Total operating expenses—  11  37,240  1,990  (1,240) 38,001  
Operating income—  18  4,719  572  —  5,309  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense—  (528) (114) (193) —  (835) 
Interest expense to affiliates—  (522) (21) —  21  (522) 
Interest income—  23  16   (21) 19  
Other (expense) income, net—  (87) 33  —  —  (54) 
Total other expense, net—  (1,114) (86) (192) —  (1,392) 
Income (loss) before income taxes—  (1,096) 4,633  380  —  3,917  
Income tax expense—  —  (950) (79) —  (1,029) 
Earnings of subsidiaries2,888  3,984  32  —  (6,904) —  
Net income$2,888  $2,888  $3,715  $301  $(6,904) $2,888  
Net income$2,888  $2,888  $3,715  $301  $(6,904) $2,888  
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(332) (332) 116  —  216  (332) 
Total comprehensive income$2,556  $2,556  $3,831  $301  $(6,688) $2,556  

106

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Revenues           
Service revenues$
 $
 $23,748
 $1,669
 $(596) $24,821
Equipment revenues
 
 7,148
 
 (430) 6,718
Other revenues
 1
 356
 171
 (14) 514
Total revenues
 1
 31,252
 1,840
 (1,040) 32,053
Operating expenses           
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
 
 5,530
 24
 
 5,554
Cost of equipment sales
 
 9,055
 720
 (431) 9,344
Selling, general and administrative
 
 10,065
 733
 (609) 10,189
Depreciation and amortization
 
 4,605
 83
 
 4,688
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
 
 376
 
 
 376
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
 
 (163) 
 
 (163)
Total operating expenses
 
 29,468
 1,560
 (1,040) 29,988
Operating income
 1
 1,784
 280
 
 2,065
Other income (expense)           
Interest expense
 (847) (50) (188) 
 (1,085)
Interest expense to affiliates
 (411) 
 
 
 (411)
Interest income
 2
 418
 
 
 420
Other expense, net
 (10) 
 (1) 
 (11)
Total other income (expense), net
 (1,266) 368
 (189) 
 (1,087)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (1,265) 2,152
 91
 
 978
Income tax expense
 
 (214) (31) 
 (245)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries733
 1,998
 (48) 
 (2,683) 
Net income733
 733
 1,890
 60
 (2,683) 733
Dividends on preferred stock(55) 
 
 
 
 (55)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$678
 $733
 $1,890
 $60
 $(2,683) $678
            
Net income$733
 $733
 $1,890
 $60
 $(2,683) $733
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax           
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(2) (2) (2) 
 4
 (2)
Total comprehensive income$731
 $731
 $1,888
 $60
 $(2,679) $731


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 20142017
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Revenues
Service revenues$—  $—  $28,894  $2,113  $(847) $30,160  
Equipment revenues—  —  9,620  —  (245) 9,375  
Other revenues—   879  212  (25) 1,069  
Total revenues—   39,393  2,325  (1,117) 40,604  
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  6,076  24  —  6,100  
Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below—  —  10,849  1,003  (244) 11,608  
Selling, general and administrative—  —  12,276  856  (873) 12,259  
Depreciation and amortization—  —  5,914  70  —  5,984  
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses—  —  (235) —  —  (235) 
Total operating expenses—  —  34,880  1,953  (1,117) 35,716  
Operating income—   4,513  372  —  4,888  
Other income (expense)
Interest expense—  (811) (109) (191) —  (1,111) 
Interest expense to affiliates—  (560) (23) —  23  (560) 
Interest income 29  10  —  (23) 17  
Other income (expense), net—  (88) 16  (1) —  (73) 
Total other income (expense), net (1,430) (106) (192) —  (1,727) 
Income (loss) before income taxes (1,427) 4,407  180  —  3,161  
Income tax expense (benefit)—  —  1,527  (152) —  1,375  
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries4,535  5,962  (57) —  (10,440) —  
Net income4,536  4,535  5,877  28  (10,440) 4,536  
Dividends on preferred stock(55) —  —  —  —  (55) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$4,481  $4,535  $5,877  $28  $(10,440) $4,481  
Net income$4,536  $4,535  $5,877  $28  $(10,440) $4,536  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax   —  (14)  
Total comprehensive income$4,543  $4,542  $5,884  $28  $(10,454) $4,543  


















107

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Revenues           
Service revenues$
 $
 $21,483
 $1,302
 $(410) $22,375
Equipment revenues
 
 7,319
 
 (530) 6,789
Other revenues
 
 270
 140
 (10) 400
Total revenues
 
 29,072
 1,442
 (950) 29,564
Operating expenses           
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
 
 5,767
 21
 
 5,788
Cost of equipment sales
 
 9,491
 702
 (572) 9,621
Selling, general and administrative
 
 8,723
 518
 (378) 8,863
Depreciation and amortization
 
 4,330
 82
 
 4,412
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
 
 299
 
 
 299
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
 
 (840) 
 
 (840)
Other, net
 
 5
 
 
 5
Total operating expenses
 
 27,775
 1,323
 (950) 28,148
Operating income
 
 1,297
 119
 
 1,416
Other income (expense)           
Interest expense
 (838) (55) (180) 
 (1,073)
Interest expense to affiliates
 (278) 
 
 
 (278)
Interest income
 
 359
 
 
 359
Other income (expense), net
 (15) 4
 
 
 (11)
Total other income (expense), net
 (1,131) 308
 (180) 
 (1,003)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (1,131) 1,605
 (61) 
 413
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 (189) 23
 
 (166)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries247
 1,278
 (54) 
 (1,471) 
Net income (loss)$247
 $147
 $1,362
 $(38) $(1,471) $247
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax           
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(2) (2) (2) 
 4
 (2)
Total comprehensive income (loss)$245
 $145
 $1,360
 $(38) $(1,467) $245




Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Year Ended December 31, 20162019
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Operating activities
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$—  $(752) $11,338  $(3,207) $(555) $6,824  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment—  —  (6,391) —  —  (6,391) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits—  —  (967) —  —  (967) 
Proceeds from sales of tower sites—  —  38  —  —  38  
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions—  —  37  3,839  —  3,876  
Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements—  (632) —  —  —  (632) 
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired—  (32)  —  —  (31) 
Other, net—  (12) (6) —  —  (18) 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities—  (676) (7,288) 3,839  —  (4,125) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility, net—  2,340  —  —  —  2,340  
Repayments of revolving credit facility—  —  (2,340) —  —  (2,340) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations—  —  (798) —  —  (798) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net—  —  (775) —  —  (775) 
Repayments of long-term debt—  —  (600) —  —  (600) 
Intercompany advances, net (912) 934  (23) —  —  
Tax withholdings on share-based awards—  —  (156) —  —  (156) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs—  —  (28) —  —  (28) 
Intercompany dividend paid—  —  —  (555) 555  —  
Other, net —  (19) —  —  (17) 
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities 1,428  (3,782) (578) 555  (2,374) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents —  268  54  —  325  
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period  1,082  118  —  1,203  
End of period$ $ $1,350  $172  $—  $1,528  

108

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Operating activities           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$6
 $(2,031) $8,166
 $104
 $(110) $6,135
            
Investing activities           
Purchases of property and equipment
 
 (4,702) 
 
 (4,702)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
 
 (3,968) 
 
 (3,968)
Sales of short-term investments
 2,000
 998
 
 
 2,998
Other, net
 
 (8) 
 
 (8)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 2,000
 (7,680) 
 
 (5,680)
            
Financing activities           
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 997
 
 
 
 997
Repayments of capital lease obligations
 
 (205) 
 
 (205)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
 
 (150) 
 
 (150)
Repayments of long-term debt
 
 (20) 
 
 (20)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options29
 
 
 
 
 29
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
 
 (121) 
 
 (121)
Intercompany dividend paid
 
 
 (110) 110
 
Dividends on preferred stock(55) 
 
 
 
 (55)
Other, net
 
 (12) 
 
 (12)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(26) 997
 (508) (110) 110
 463
Change in cash and cash equivalents(20) 966
 (22) (6) 
 918
Cash and cash equivalents           
Beginning of period378
 1,767
 2,364
 73
 
 4,582
End of period$358
 $2,733
 $2,342
 $67
 $
 $5,500


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Year Ended December 31, 20152018
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Operating activities
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$—  $(1,254) $10,414  $(5,041) $(220) $3,899  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment—  —  (5,536) (5) —  (5,541) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits—  —  (127) —  —  (127) 
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions—  —  53  5,353  —  5,406  
Acquisition of companies, net of cash—  —  (338) —  —  (338) 
Equity investment in subsidiary—  —  (43) —  43  —  
Other, net—  (7) 28  —  —  21  
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities—  (7) (5,963) 5,348  43  (579) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt—  2,494  —  —  —  2,494  
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility, net—  6,265  —  —  —  6,265  
Repayments of revolving credit facility—  —  (6,265) —  —  (6,265) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations—  —  (700) —  —  (700) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net—  —  (300) —  —  (300) 
Repayments of long-term debt—  —  (3,349) —  —  (3,349) 
Repurchases of common stock(1,071) —  —  —  —  (1,071) 
Intercompany advances, net995  (7,498) 6,530  (27) —  —  
Equity investment from parent—  —  43  —  (43) —  
Tax withholdings on share-based awards—  —  (146) —  —  (146) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs—  —  (212) —  —  (212) 
Intercompany dividend paid—  —  —  (220) 220  —  
Other, net —  (56) —  —  (52) 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(72) 1,261  (4,455) (247) 177  (3,336) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents(72) —  (4) 60  —  (16) 
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period74   1,086  58  —  1,219  
End of period$ $ $1,082  $118  $—  $1,203  

















109

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Operating activities           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(1) $(4,504) $9,940
 $154
 $(175) $5,414
            
Investing activities           
Purchases of property and equipment
 
 (4,724) 
 
��(4,724)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
 
 (1,935) 
 
 (1,935)
Purchases of short-term investments
 (1,999) (998) 
 
 (2,997)
Investment in subsidiaries(1,905) 
 
 
 1,905
 
Other, net
 
 96
 
 
 96
Net cash used in investing activities(1,905) (1,999) (7,561) 
 1,905
 (9,560)
            
Financing activities           
Proceeds from capital contribution
 1,905
 
 
 (1,905) 
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 3,979
 
 
 
 3,979
Proceeds from tower obligations
 140
 
 
 
 140
Repayments of capital lease obligations
 
 (57) 
 
 (57)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
 
 (564) 
 
 (564)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options47
 
 
 
 
 47
Intercompany dividend paid
 
 
 (175) 175
 
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
 
 (156) 
 
 (156)
Dividends on preferred stock(41) 
 (14) 
 
 (55)
Other, net
 
 79
 
 
 79
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities6
 6,024
 (712) (175) (1,730) 3,413
Change in cash and cash equivalents(1,900) (479) 1,667
 (21) 
 (733)
Cash and cash equivalents           
Beginning of period2,278
 2,246
 697
 94
 
 5,315
End of period$378
 $1,767
 $2,364
 $73
 $
 $4,582



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Year Ended December 31, 20142017
(in millions)ParentIssuerGuarantor SubsidiariesNon-Guarantor SubsidiariesConsolidating and Eliminating AdjustmentsConsolidated
Operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$ $(1,613) $9,761  $(4,218) $(100) $3,831  
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment—  —  (5,237) —  —  (5,237) 
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits—  —  (5,828) —  —  (5,828) 
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions—  —  43  4,276  —  4,319  
Equity investment in subsidiary(308) —  —  —  308  —  
Other, net—  —   —  —   
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(308) —  (11,021) 4,276  308  (6,745) 
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt—  10,480  —  —  —  10,480  
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility, net—  2,910  —  —  —  2,910  
Repayments of revolving credit facility—  —  (2,910) —  —  (2,910) 
Repayments of financing lease obligations—  —  (486) —  —  (486) 
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net—  —  (300) —  —  (300) 
Repayments of long-term debt—  —  (10,230) —  —  (10,230) 
Repurchases of common stock(427) —  —  —  —  (427) 
Intercompany advances, net484  (14,817) 14,300  33  —  —  
Equity investment from parent—  308  —  —  (308) —  
Tax withholdings on share-based awards—  —  (166) —  —  (166) 
Dividends on preferred stock(55) —  —  —  —  (55) 
Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs—  —  (188) —  —  (188) 
Intercompany dividend paid—  —  —  (100) 100  —  
Other, net21  —  (16) —  —   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities23  (1,119)  (67) (208) (1,367) 
Change in cash and cash equivalents(284) (2,732) (1,256) (9) —  (4,281) 
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period358  2,733  2,342  67  —  5,500  
End of period$74  $ $1,086  $58  $—  $1,219  
















110

(in millions)Parent Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments Consolidated
Operating activities           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$9
 $(5,145) $9,364
 $18
 $(100) $4,146
            
Investing activities           
Purchases of property and equipment
 
 (4,317) 
 
 (4,317)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
 
 (2,900) 
 
 (2,900)
Investment in subsidiaries(1,700) 
 
 
 1,700
 
Other, net
 
 (29) 
 
 (29)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,700) 
 (7,246) 
 1,700
 (7,246)
            
Financing activities           
Proceeds from capital contribution
 1,700
 
 
 (1,700) 
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 2,993
 
 
 
 2,993
Repayments of capital lease obligations
 
 (19) 
 
 (19)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
 
 (418) 
 
 (418)
Repayments of long-term debt
 
 (1,000) 
 
 (1,000)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options27
 
 
 
 
 27
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock982
 
 
 
 
 982
Intercompany dividend paid
 
 
 (100) 100
 
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
 
 (73) 
 
 (73)
Other, net
 
 32
 
 
 32
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,009
 4,693
 (1,478) (100) (1,600) 2,524
Change in cash and cash equivalents(682) (452) 640
 (82) 
 (576)
Cash and cash equivalents           
Beginning of period2,960
 2,698
 57
 176
 
 5,891
End of period$2,278
 $2,246
 $697
 $94
 $
 $5,315



Supplementary Data


Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth QuarterFull Year
2019
Total revenues$11,080  $10,979  $11,061  $11,878  $44,998  
Operating income1,476  1,541  1,471  1,234  5,722  
Net income908  939  870  751  3,468  
Net income attributable to common stockholders908  939  870  751  3,468  
Earnings per share
Basic$1.07  $1.10  $1.02  $0.88  $4.06  
Diluted$1.06  $1.09  $1.01  $0.87  $4.02  
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic851,223,498  854,368,443  854,578,241  856,294,467  854,143,751  
Diluted858,643,481  860,135,593  862,690,751  864,158,739  863,433,511  
2018
Total revenues$10,455  $10,571  $10,839  $11,445  $43,310  
Operating income1,282  1,450  1,440  1,137  5,309  
Net income671  782  795  640  2,888  
Net income attributable to common stockholders671  782  795  640  2,888  
Earnings per share
Basic$0.78  $0.92  $0.94  $0.75  $3.40  
Diluted$0.78  $0.92  $0.93  $0.75  $3.36  
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic855,222,664  847,660,488  847,087,120  849,102,785  849,744,152  
Diluted862,244,084  852,040,670  853,852,764  856,344,347  858,290,174  
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Full Year
2016         
Total revenues$8,599
 $9,222
 $9,246
 $10,175
 $37,242
Operating income1,103
 768
 989
 942
 3,802
Net income479
 225
 366
 390
 1,460
Dividends on preferred stock(14) (14) (13) (14) (55)
Net income attributable to common stockholders465
 211
 353
 376
 1,405
Earnings per share         
Basic$0.57
 $0.26
 $0.43
 $0.46
 $1.71
Diluted$0.56
 $0.25
 $0.42
 $0.45
 $1.69
Weighted average shares outstanding         
Basic819,431,761
 822,434,490
 822,998,697
 824,982,734
 822,470,275
Diluted859,382,827
 829,752,956
 832,257,819
 867,262,400
 833,054,545
Net income includes:         
Cost of MetroPCS business combination$36
 $59
 $15
 $(6) $104
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses(636) 
 (199) 
 (835)
2015         
Total revenues$7,778
 $8,179
 $7,849
 $8,247
 $32,053
Operating income117
 597
 513
 838
 2,065
Net income (loss)(63) 361
 138
 297
 733
Dividends on preferred stock(14) (14) (13) (14) (55)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders(77) 347
 125
 283
 678
Earnings (loss) per share         
Basic$(0.09) $0.43
 $0.15
 $0.35
 $0.83
Diluted$(0.09) $0.42
 $0.15
 $0.34
 $0.82
Weighted average shares outstanding         
Basic808,605,526
 811,605,031
 815,069,272
 816,585,782
 812,994,028
Diluted808,605,526
 821,122,537
 822,017,220
 824,716,119
 822,617,938
Net income (loss) includes:         
Cost of MetroPCS business combination$128
 $34
 $193
 $21
 $376
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
 (23) (1) (139) (163)


Earnings (loss) per share is computed independently for each quarter and the sum of the quarters may not equal earnings (loss) per share for the full year.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Principal Financial Officer,principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and

procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report.Form 10-K.


The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, to this Form 10-K.


111

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


ThereBeginning January 1, 2019, we adopted the new lease standard and implemented significant new lease accounting systems, processes and internal controls over lease accounting to assist us in the application of the new lease standard. Other than as discussed above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.


Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions;transactions, providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;principles, providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with management authorization;authorization, and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.


Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.


The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report herein.


Item 9B. Other Information


None.


PART III. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


We maintain a code of ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, and Controller, which is a “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. This code is publicly available on our website at investor.t-mobile.com. If we make any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies on our website at investor.t-mobile.com or in a periodic reportCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.


The remaining information required by this item, including information about our Directors, Executive Officers and Audit Committee, iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.pursuant to Regulation 14A or be included in an amendment to this Report.



Item 11. Executive Compensation


The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.


112

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services


The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.


PART IV.


Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules


(a) Documents filed as a part of this Form 10-K:10-K


1. Financial Statements


The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K:


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


2. Financial Statement Schedules


All other schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.


3. Exhibits


See the Exhibit Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page“Item 16. Form 10-K Summary” of this Form 10-K.


Item 16. Form 10–K Summary


None.



SIGNATURES
113


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
2.18-K10/3/20122.1  
2.28-K12/7/20122.1  
2.38-K4/15/20132.1  
2.48-K04/30/20182.1
2.58-K7/26/20192.2
2.68-K7/26/20192.1
3.18-K5/2/20133.1  
3.28-K5/2/20133.2  
3.38-K10/11/20193.1  
3.48-K12/15/20143.1  
3.5

8-K2/22/20183.1  
4.18-K5/2/20134.1
4.28-K5/2/20134.12  
4.38-K11/22/20134.1  
4.48-K11/22/20134.2  
4.510-Q10/28/20144.3  
114

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
4.68-K9/5/20144.1  
4.78-K9/5/20144.2  
4.810-Q10/27/20154.3  
4.98-K11/5/20154.1  
4.108-K4/1/20164.1  
4.118-K3/16/20174.1  
4.128-K3/16/20174.2  
4.138-K3/16/20174.3  
4.148-K4/28/20174.1  
4.158-K4/28/20174.2  
4.168-K4/28/20174.3  
4.178-K5/9/20174.1  
115

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
4.188-K5/9/20174.2  
4.198-K1/25/20184.1  
4.208-K1/25/20184.2  
4.218-K5/2/20134.13  
4.2210-Q5/1/20184.5
4.238-K5/4/20184.1
4.248-K5/4/20184.2
4.258-K5/21/20184.1
4.268-K12/21/20184.1  
4.2710-K2/7/20194.41
4.2810-Q10/28/20194.1  
4.29X
10.110-Q8/8/201310.1  
10.210-Q8/8/201310.2  
10.310-K2/7/201910.3
116

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.410-Q8/8/201310.3  
10.510-Q8/8/201310.4  
10.610-Q8/8/201310.5  
10.7

10-K2/7/201910.7
10.810-Q8/8/201310.6  
10.910-Q8/8/201310.7  
10.1010-K2/7/201910.10
10.1110-K2/7/201910.11
10.1210-Q8/8/201310.8  
117

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.138-K5/2/201310.1  
10.1410-Q8/8/201310.10  
10.158-K5/2/201310.2  
10.1610-Q7/26/201910.5  
10.178-K3/4/201410.1  
10.1810-K2/19/201510.55  
10.1910-Q4/28/201510.5  
10.208-K3/4/201410.2  
10.2110-K2/19/201510.56  
10.2210-Q4/28/201510.6  
10.2310-K2/14/201710.33  
10.2410-Q7/20/201710.1  
10.258-K3/4/201910.1  
10.268-K11/12/201510.1  
118

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.2710-Q4/24/201710.3  
10.2810-Q4/24/201710.4  
10.2910-Q4/24/201710.5  
10.308-K7/27/201710.1  
10.318-K3/30/201810.1  
10.328-K12/30/201610.3  
10.338-K1/25/201710.1  
10.34

10-Q10/30/201810.2  
10.3510-Q10/30/201810.1  
10.3610-K2/7/201910.45  
119

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.378-K3/7/20161.1  
10.388-K11/2/201610.1  
10.398-K4/26/20161.1  
10.408-K11/2/201610.2  
10.418-K4/29/20161.1  
10.428-K11/2/201610.3  
10.438-K3/16/201710.1  
10.448-K1/25/201810.1  
10.458-K12/30/201610.1  
10.468-K3/30/201810.3  
10.478-K12/30/201610.2  
10.488-K3/30/201810.2  
10.49*S-1/A2/27/2007 10.1(a)
10.50*Schedule 14A4/19/2010 Annex A
10.51*10-Q8/9/201010.2  
10.52*10-Q10/30/201210.1  
120

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.53*10-K3/1/2013 10.9(a)
10.54*10-K2/29/201210.12 
10.55*10-K2/8/201810.69
10.56*

10-Q5/1/201810.12 
10.57*10-Q10/28/201910.1 
10.58*X
10.59*10-Q4/24/201710.7 
10.60*10-Q5/1/201810.10 
10.61*X
10.62*10-Q7/26/201910.1
10.63*10-Q7/26/201910.2
10.64*10-Q7/26/201910.3
10.65*X
10.66*10-Q5/1/201810.9
10.67*10-K2/8/201810.76
10.68*10-K2/25/201410.39 
10.69*

10-K2/7/201910.75
10.70*8-K10/25/201310.1 
10.71*10-Q8/8/201310.20 
10.72*Schedule 14A4/26/2018Annex A 
10.73*10-Q8/8/201310.21 
10.74*X
10.75*8-K6/4/201310.2 
121

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.76*X
10.77*X
10.78*S-82/19/201599.1  
10.79*10-Q7/26/201910.4  
10.80*8-K04/30/201810.1  
10.818-K9/9/201910.1  
10.828-K04/30/201810.3  
21.1X
23.1X
24.1
31.1X
31.2X
32.1**X
32.2**X
101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.X
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.X
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.X
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.X
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.X
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).


*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Furnished herein.


122

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


T-MOBILE US, INC.
February 14, 20176, 2020/s/ John J. Legere
John J. Legere
President and
Chief Executive Officer


POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John J. Legere, and J. Braxton Carter and David A. Miller, and each or eitherany of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments or supplements (including post-effective amendments) to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 14, 2017.6, 2020.


SignatureTitle
/s/ John J. LegerePresident and Chief Executive Officer and
John J. LegereDirector (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ J. Braxton CarterExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
J. Braxton Carter(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Peter OsvaldikSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting
Peter OsvaldikOfficer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Timotheus HöttgesChairman of the Board
Timotheus Höttges

/s/ W. Michael BarnesDirector
W. Michael Barnes

/s/ Thomas DannenfeldtDirector
Thomas Dannenfeldt

/s/ Srikant DatarDirector
Srikant Datar

/s/ Lawrence H. GuffeyDirector
Lawrence H. Guffey

/s/ Bruno JacobfeuerbornDirector
Bruno Jacobfeuerborn

/s/ Raphael KüblerDirector
Raphael Kübler

/s/ Thorsten LangheimDirector
Thorsten Langheim

/s/ Teresa A. TaylorDirector
Teresa A. Taylor

/s/ Kelvin R. WestbrookDirector
Kelvin R. Westbrook


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
2.1 Business Combination Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012, by and among MetroPCS Communications, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG, T-Mobile Zwischenholding GMBH, T-Mobile Global Holding GMBH and T-Mobile USA, Inc. 8-K 10/3/2012 2.1 
2.2 Consent Solicitation Letter Agreement, dated December 5, 2012, by and among MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG, amending Exhibit G to the Business Combination Agreement. 8-K 12/7/2012 2.1 
2.3 Amendment No. 1 to the Business Combination Agreement by and among Deutsche Telekom AG, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH, T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH and MetroPCS Communications, Inc., dated April 14, 2013. 8-K 4/15/2013 2.1 
3.1 Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. 8-K 5/2/2013 3.1 
3.2 Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws. 8-K 5/2/2013 3.2 
3.3 Certificate of Designation of 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, of T-Mobile US, Inc., dated December 12, 2014. 8-K 12/15/2014 3.1 
4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007, between MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, which includes the form of Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights as Exhibit C. 8-K 3/30/2007 4.1 
4.2 Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012 between MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent. 8-K 10/3/2012 4.1 
4.3 Indenture, dated September 21, 2010, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a trustee. 8-K 9/21/2010 4.1 
4.4 First Supplemental Indenture, dated September 21, 2010, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 9/21/2010 4.2 
4.5 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 17, 2010, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 11/17/2010 4.1 
4.6 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 23, 2010, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-K 3/1/2011  10.19(d) 
4.7 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 23, 2010, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-K 3/1/2011 10.19(e) 
4.8 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2012, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 12/17/2012 4.1 
4.9 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2012, among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 12/17/2012 4.2 
4.10 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.15 
4.11 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-Q 8/8/2013 4.19 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
4.12 Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 11, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-Q 10/28/2014 4.2 
4.13 Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-Q 10/27/2015 4.2 
4.14 Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 11, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. 10-Q 10/24/2016 4.1 
4.15 Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2013, by and among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 3/22/2013 4.1 
4.16 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2013, by and among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 3/22/2013 4.2 
4.17 Form of 6.250% Senior Notes due 2021. 8-K 3/22/2013 4.3 
4.18 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2013, by and among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 3/22/2013 4.4 
4.19 Form of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2023. 8-K 3/22/2013 4.5 
4.20 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 29, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 8/8/2013 4.17 
4.21 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.16 
4.22 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 8/8/2013 4.20 
4.23 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 11, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/28/2014 4.1 
4.24 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/27/2015 4.1 
4.25 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/24/2016 4.20 
4.26 Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.10 
4.27 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.2 
4.28 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.3 
4.29 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.4 
4.30 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.5 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
4.31 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.6 
4.32 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.7 
4.33 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.8 
4.34 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.9 
4.35 Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.10 
4.36 Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.11 
4.37 Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2013 among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.12 
4.38 Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 8/8/2013 4.18 
4.39 Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 21, 2013, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the Form of 5.250% Senior Note due 2018. 8-K 8/22/2013 4.1 
4.40 Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2013, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the Form of 6.125% Senior Note due 2022. 8-K 11/22/2013 4.1 
4.41 Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2013, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the Form of 6.500% Senior Note due 2024. 8-K 11/22/2013 4.2 
4.42 Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 11, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/28/2014 4.3 
4.43 Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 5, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the Form of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2023. 8-K 9/5/2014 4.1 
4.44 Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 5, 2014, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the Form of 6.375% Senior Notes due 2025. 8-K 9/5/2014 4.2 
4.45 Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/27/2015 4.3 
4.46 Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 5, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, including the Form of 6.500% Senior Notes due 2026. 8-K 11/5/2015 4.1 
4.47 Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 5, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, including the Form of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024. 8-K 4/1/2016 4.1 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
4.48 Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. 10-Q 10/24/2016 4.3 
4.49 Noteholder Agreement dated as of April 28, 2013, by and between Deutsche Telekom AG and T-Mobile USA, Inc. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.13 
10.1 Master Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., Crown Castle International Corp., and certain T-Mobile and Crown subsidiaries. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.1 
10.2 Amendment No. 1, to Master Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, among Crown Castle International Corp., and certain T-Mobile and Crown subsidiaries. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.2 
10.3 Master Prepaid Lease, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among T-Mobile USA Tower LLC, T-Mobile West Tower LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.3 
10.4 MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.4 
10.5 First Amendment to MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.5 
10.6 Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013  10.6 
10.7 First Amendment to Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.7 
10.8 Management Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Property Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA Tower LLC, T-Mobile West Tower LLC, CCTMO LLC, T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.8 
10.9 Stockholder’s Agreement dated as of April 30, 2013 by and between MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 5/2/2013  10.1 
10.10 Waiver of Required Approval Under Section 3.6(a) of the Stockholder's Agreement, dated August 7, 2013, between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG. 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.10 
10.11 License Agreement dated as of April 30, 2013 by and between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 5/2/2013 10.2 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
10.12 Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., as Borrower, Deutsche Telekom AG, as Lender, the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 8-K 5/2/2013 4.14 
10.13 Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 15, 2013, to the Credit Agreement, dated May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., each of the Subsidiaries signatory thereto, Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 8-K 11/20/2013 10.1 
10.14 Amendment No. 2, dated as of September 3, 2014, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 8-K 9/5/2014 10.1 
10.15 Amendment No. 3, dated as of November 2, 2015, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as Administrative Agent. 8-K 11/5/2015 10.2 
10.16 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2013, by and among MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., the Initial Guarantors (as defined therein), and Deutsche Bank Securities, as representative of the Initial Purchasers (as defined therein). 8-K 3/22/2013 10.1 
10.17 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2013, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as Initial Purchaser (as defined therein). 8-K 8/21/2013 10.1 
10.18 License Exchange Agreement, dated January 5, 2014, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile License LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, Athens Cellular, Inc. and Verizon Wireless of the East LP. 8-K 1/6/2014 10.1 
10.19 License Purchase Agreement, dated January 5, 2014, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile License LLC and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless. 8-K 1/6/2014 10.2 
10.20 Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2014, among T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. 8-K 3/4/2014 10.1 
10.21 Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2014, between T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as purchaser. 8-K 3/4/2014 10.2 
10.22 Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2014, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. 8-K 3/4/2014 10.3 
10.23 Omnibus Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement and Fee Letter, dated as of April 11, 2014, by and among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent and a bank purchaser, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor, and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as a bank purchaser. 10-Q 5/1/2014 10.7 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
10.24 Second Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 12, 2014, by and among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent and a bank purchaser, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer and T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor. 10-Q 7/31/2014 10.2 
10.25 Third Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2014, by and among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent and a bank purchaser, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer and T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor. 10-Q 10/28/2014 10.2 
10.26 Fourth Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2014, by and among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent and a bank purchaser, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer and T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor. 10-K 2/19/2015 10.54 
10.27 Joinder and First Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2014, among Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. 10-K 2/19/2015 10.55 
10.28 First Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2014, between T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as purchaser. 10-K 2/19/2015 10.56 
10.29 November 2016 Amended and Restated Guarantee Facility Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2016, among T-Mobile US, Inc., as the company, T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as the funding seller, and KfW IPEX-Bank GmbH, as the bank. 
 
 
 X
10.30 Fifth Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2015, by and among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent and a bank purchaser, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer and T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor. 10-Q 4/28/2015 10.4 
10.31 Joinder and Second Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2015, among SunCom Wireless Operating Company, LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. 10-Q 4/28/2015 10.5 
10.32 Second Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2015, by and among T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as purchaser. 10-Q 4/28/2015 10.6 
10.33 Third Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as purchaser. 
 
 
 X

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
10.34 October 2015 Amendment to the Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2015, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. 8-K 11/5/2015 10.1 
10.35 First Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Düsseldorf Branch, as bank collections agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T- Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. 10-Q 7/27/2016 10.5 
10.36 Second Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2016, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as bank collection agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. 8-K 12/6/2016 10.1 
10.37 Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent. 8-K 11/12/2015 10.1 
10.38 Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2015, by and between T-Mobile Financial LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as purchaser. 8-K 11/20/2015 10.1 
10.39 First Amendment to the Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2016, by and between T-Mobile Financial LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as purchaser. 10-Q 4/26/2016 10.3 
10.40 Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and between T-Mobile Financial LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as purchaser. 8-K 6/8/2016 10.1 
10.41 First Amendment, dated as of December 23, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and between T-Mobile Financial LLC, as seller, and T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as purchaser. 
 
 
 X
10.42 Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2015, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto from time to time. 8-K 11/20/2015 10.2 
10.43 Omnibus First Amendment to the Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement and Administrative Agent Fee Letter, dated as of March 18, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, individually and as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions form time to time party thereto. 10-Q 4/26/2016 10.2 
10.44 Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto from time to time. 8-K 6/8/2016 10.2 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
10.45 First Amendment, dated as of July 27, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. 10-Q 10/24/2016 10.1 
10.46 Second Amendment, dated as of October 31, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. 
 
 
 X
10.47 Third Amendment, dated as of December 23, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. 
 
 
 X
10.48 Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2016, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantor party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 3/7/2016 1.1 
10.49 Amendment No. 1 to Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2016, to Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 11/2/2016 10.1 
10.50 Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2016, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantor party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 4/26/2016 1.1 
10.51 Amendment No. 1 to Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2016, to Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 11/2/2016 10.2 
10.52 Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2016, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantor party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 4/29/2016 1.1 
10.53 Amendment No. 1 to Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2016, to Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Telekom AG. 8-K 11/2/2016 10.3 
10.54 Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2016, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time party thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Telekom AG, as administrative agent. 8-K 12/30/2016 10.1 
10.55 Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2016, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time party thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Telekom AG, as administrative agent. 8-K 12/30/2016 10.2 
10.56 First Incremental Facility Amendment, dated as of December 29, 2016, to the Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent. 8-K 12/30/2016 10.3 

    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit No. Exhibit Description Form Date of First Filing Exhibit Number Filed Herein
10.57 Second Incremental Facility Amendment, dated as of January 25, 2017, to the Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, as amended by that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent. 8-K 1/25/2017 10.1 
10.58* Amended and Restated MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. S-1/A 2/27/2007  10.1(a) 
10.59* MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. Schedule 14A 4/19/2010  Annex A 
10.60* Form Change in Control Agreement for MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 10-Q 8/9/2010 10.2 
10.61* Form Change in Control Agreement Amendment for MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 10-Q 10/30/2012 10.1 
10.62* MetroPCS Communications, Inc. Employee Non-qualified Stock Option Award Agreement relating to the MetroPCS Communications, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. 10-K 3/1/2013  10.9(a) 
10.63* MetroPCS Communications, Inc. Non-Employee Director Non-qualified Stock Option Award Agreement relating to the MetroPCS Communications, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. 10-K 3/1/2013  10.9(b) 
10.64* Form Amendment to the MetroPCS Communications, Inc. Notice of Grant of Stock Option relating to the Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan of MetroPCS, Inc. 10-Q 8/9/2010 10.5 
10.65* Form MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement. 10-K 2/29/2012 10.12 
10.66* Form MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement. 10-K 3/1/2013  10.12(b) 
10.67* Employment Agreement of J. Braxton Carter dated as of January 25, 2013. 8-K 5/2/2013 10.3 
10.68* Employment Agreement of Thomas C. Keys dated as of January 25, 2013. 8-K 5/2/2013 10.4 
10.69* Employment Agreement of John J. Legere dated as of September 22, 2012. 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.17 
10.70* Amendment to Employment Agreement of John J. Legere dated as of October 23, 2013. 10-K 2/25/2014 10.35 
10.71* Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between T-Mobile US, Inc. and John J. Legere, dated as of February 25, 2015. 8-K 2/26/2015 10.1 
10.72* T-Mobile US, Inc. Compensation Term Sheet for Michael Sievert Effective as of February 13, 2015. 10-Q 4/28/2015 10.3 
10.73* Form of Indemnification Agreement. 8-K 5/2/2013 10.6 
10.74* T-Mobile US, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Executive Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014). 10-K 2/25/2014 10.39 
10.75* T-Mobile US, Inc. Executive Continuity Plan as Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014. 8-K 10/25/2013 10.1 
10.76* T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on August 7, 2013). 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.20 
10.77* T-Mobile USA, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan. 10-Q 8/8/2013 10.21 

SignatureIncorporated by ReferenceTitle
Exhibit No.Exhibit DescriptionFormDate of First FilingExhibit NumberFiled Herein
10.78*/s/ John J. LegereAnnual Incentive Award Notice under the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.10-K2/25/201410.45
10.79*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.8-K6/4/201310.2
10.80*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Time-Vesting) for Executive Officers under the T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.10-Q8/8/201310.24
10.81*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Performance-Vesting) for Executive Officers under the T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.10-Q8/8/201310.25
10.82*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Performance-Vesting) with Deferral Option for Executive Officers under the T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.10-K2/19/201510.43
10.83*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Time-Vesting) with Deferral Option for Executive Officers under the T-Mobile US, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.10-K2/19/201510.44
10.84*T-Mobile US, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.S-82/19/201599.1
10.85*Amended Director Compensation Program effective as of May 1, 2013 (amended June 4, 2014 and further amended on June 1, 2015 and June 16, 2016).10-Q7/27/201610.6
12.1Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.


X
21.1Subsidiaries of Registrant.


X
23.1Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.


X
24.1Power of Attorney, pursuant to which amendments to this Form 10-K may be filed (included on the signature page contained in Part IV of the Form 10-K).


X
31.1Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



Xand
31.2John J. LegereCertifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



X
32.1**Certification of ChiefDirector (Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




101.INSXBRL Instance Document.


X
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.


X
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.


X
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.


X
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.


X
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.


XOfficer)

*/s/ G. Michael SievertIndicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.President and Chief Operating Officer
**G. Michael SievertFurnished herein.Director



/s/ J. Braxton CarterExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
J. Braxton Carter(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Peter OsvaldikSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting
Peter OsvaldikOfficer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Timotheus HöttgesChairman of the Board
Timotheus Höttges

/s/ Srikant DatarDirector
Srikant Datar


107
123

/s/ Lawrence H. GuffeyDirector
Lawrence H. Guffey

/s/ Christian P. IllekDirector
Christian P. Illek

/s/ Srini GopalanDirector
Srini Gopalan

/s/ Bruno JacobfeuerbornDirector
Bruno Jacobfeuerborn

/s/ Raphael KüblerDirector
Raphael Kübler

/s/ Thorsten LangheimDirector
Thorsten Langheim

/s/ Teresa A. TaylorDirector
Teresa A. Taylor

/s/ Kelvin R. WestbrookDirector
Kelvin R. Westbrook