Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________________________________________________
FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-51398
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Federally chartered corporation of the United States94-6000630
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. employer identification number)
333 Bush Street, Suite 2700
San Francisco,CA94104
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Federally chartered corporation94-6000630
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
600 California Street
San Francisco, CA
94108
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
(415) 616-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Stock, par value $100
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days.    x  Yes     o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filer
x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    o Yes    x  No
Registrant's capital stock is not publicly traded and is only issued to members of the registrant. Such capital stock is issued and redeemed at par value, $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. At June 30, 2017,2021, the aggregate par value of the capital stock held by shareholders of the registrant was approximately $3,091$2,272 million. At February 28, 2018,2022, the total shares of capital stock outstanding, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, totaled 37,340,430.21,080,505.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.



Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
20172021 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of Contents
PART I
PART I.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3
Item 4
PART II.II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III.Item 9C.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV.IV
Item 15.


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.Item 16.BUSINESS
Form 10-K Summary
SIGNATURES



Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
At the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank)(Bank, we, our, us), our purpose is to enhance the availability of credit for residential mortgages and economic development by providing a readily available, competitively priced source of funds for housing and community lenders. We are a wholesale bank—we link our customers to the global capital markets and seek to manage our own liquidity and interest rate risk management so that funds are available when our customers need them. By providing needed liquidity and financial risk management tools, our credit programs enhance competition in the mortgage market and benefit homebuyers and communities.

We are one of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) that serve the United States as part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.System (FHLBank System). Each FHLBank operates as a separate federally chartered corporation with its own board of directors, management, and employees. The FHLBanks were organized under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), and are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). The FHLBanks are not government agencies and do not receive financial support from taxpayers. The U.S. government does not guarantee, directly or indirectly, the debt securities or other obligations of the Bank or the FHLBank System. The FHLBanks are regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), an independent federal agency.

We have a cooperative ownership structure. To access our products and services, a financial institution must be approved for membership and purchase capital stock in the Bank. The member'smember’s capital stock requirement is generally based on its use of Bankour products, subject to a minimum asset-based membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having ready access to the Bank as a reliable source of competitively priced funds. BankOur capital stock is issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. It is not publicly traded.

Our members may include federally insured and regulated financial depositories, regulated insurance companies that are engaged in residential housing finance, community development financial institutions (CDFIs) that have been certified by the CDFI Fund of the U.S. Treasury Department, and privately insured, state-chartered credit unions. Financial depositories may include commercial banks, credit unions, industrial loan companies, and savings institutions. CDFIs may include community development loan funds, community development venture capital funds, and privately insured, state-chartered credit unions. All members have atheir principal place of business located in Arizona, California, or Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of the FHLBank System. Our members range in asset size from $6$12 million to over $198 billion in assets.

$208 billion.
Our primary business is providing competitively priced, collateralized loans, known as advances, to our members and certain qualifying housing associates. Advances may be fixed or adjustable rate, with terms ranging from one day to 30 years. We accept a wide range of collateral types, some of which cannot be readily pledged elsewhere or readily securitized. Members use their access to advances to support their mortgage loan portfolios, lower their funding costs, facilitate asset-liability and liquidity management, reduce on-balance sheet liquidity, offer a wider range of mortgage products to their customers, and improve profitability.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had advances and capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, outstanding to the following types of institutions:


1


Table of Contents


Advances
(Dollars in millions)Total Number of InstitutionsCapital Stock OutstandingNumber of InstitutionsPar Value of Advances Outstanding
Commercial banks138 $1,024 54 $10,306 
Savings institutions84 540 
Credit unions153 838 44 4,807 
Industrial loan companies26 
Insurance companies22 107 942 
Community development financial institutions113 
Total member institutions331 2,061 116 16,734 
Housing associates eligible to borrow— — — 
Other nonmember institutions(1)
124 
Total336 $2,064 118 $16,858 
     Advances
(Dollars in millions)Total Number of Institutions
 Capital Stock Outstanding
 Number of Institutions
 Par Value of Advances Outstanding
Commercial banks164
 $1,764
 88
 $43,045
Savings institutions11
 520
 7
 15,885
Credit unions134
 913
 40
 6,664
Industrial loan companies3
 2
 3
 42
Insurance companies9
 40
 2
 214
Community development financial institutions6
 4
 4
 78
Total member institutions327
 3,243
 144
 65,928
Housing associates eligible to borrow2
 
 1
 107
Other nonmember institutions(1)
7
 309
 5
 11,451
Total336
 $3,552
 150
 $77,486

(1)Nonmember institutions may be former members or may have acquired the advances and capital stock of a former member. Capital stock held by nonmember shareholders is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock, a liability. Nonmember shareholders with advances outstanding are required to meet the Bank's(1)    Nonmember institutions may be former members or may have acquired the advances and capital stock of a former member. Capital stock held by nonmember shareholders is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock, a liability. Nonmember shareholders with advances outstanding are required to meet our applicable credit, collateral, and capital stock requirements, including requirements regarding creditworthiness and collateral borrowing capacity. Nonmembers (including former members and member successors) are not eligible to borrow new advances from the Bank or renew existing advances as they mature.

To fund their operations, the FHLBanks issue debt in the form of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes (jointly referred to as consolidated obligations) through the FHLBanks’ Office of Finance, the fiscal agent for the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations on behalf of the FHLBanks. Because the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations are rated Aaa/P-1 by Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) and AA+/A-1+ by S&P Global Ratings (S&P) and because of the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ GSE status, the FHLBanks are generally able to raise funds at rates that are typically at a small to moderate spread above U.S. Treasury security yields. Our cooperative ownership structure allows us to pass along the benefit of these low funding rates to our members.

Members also benefit from our affordable housing and economic development programs, which provide grants and below-market-rate loans that support members’ involvement in creating affordable housing and revitalizing communities.

Our Business Model

Our cooperative ownership structure has led us to develop a business model that is different from that of a typical financial services firm. Our business model is based on the premise that we maintain a balance between our objective to promote housing, homeownership, and community and economic development through our activities with members and our objective to provide a return on the private capital provided by our members through their investment in the Bank'sour capital stock. We achieve this balance by delivering low-cost credit to help our members meet the credit needs of their communities while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank's capital stock.stock, maintaining safety and soundness.

As a cooperatively owned wholesale bank, weWe require our members to purchase our capital stock to support their activities with the Bank. We leverage this capital stock and the Bank’sour retained earnings by using our GSE status to borrow funds in the capital markets at rates that are generally at a small to moderate spread above U.S. Treasury security yields.relatively favorable rates. We lend these funds to our members at rates that are competitive with the cost of most wholesale borrowing alternatives available to our largest members.

We may also invest in residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS) up to the regulatory policy limit of three times regulatory capital, which is composed of retained earnings and capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock. Our MBS investments include agency-issued MBS that are guaranteed through the direct obligation of or are supported by the U.S. government and private-label residential MBS (PLRMBS) that were AAA-rated at the time of purchase. We also have a portfolio of residential mortgage loans purchased from members. Earnings on these MBS investments and mortgage assets have historically providedloans provide us with the financial flexibility to continue providing cost-effective

2


Table of Contents

credit and liquidity to our members. While the mortgage assets we hold are intended to increase our earnings, they also modestly increase our credit and interest rate risk. We consider the Finance Agency’s core mission achievement guidance when making investment decisions. The Finance Agency will assess annually each FHLBank’s core mission achievement by determining the ratio of primary mission assets, which is calculated as the

2

Table of Contents

average par balances of advances and mortgage loans acquired from members, to the average par balance of consolidated obligations less the average par balance of our U.S. Treasury security obligations with a maturity no greater than ten years. The Finance Agency’s expectation is that each FHLBank’s core mission asset ratio is at least 70% or higher. Our core mission asset ratio was 64.4% and 70.7% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As we target meeting the core mission asset ratio of 70%, we may be limited in the purchase of new MBS.
Additional information about our investments is provided in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments.”

Our financial strategies are designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our member base and our members' credit needs change. Our capital increases when members are required to purchase additional capital stock as they increase their advances borrowings, and it contracts when we repurchase excess capital stock from members as their advances decline. As a result of these strategies, we have been able to achieve our mission by meeting member credit needs and maintaining our strong regulatory capitaladequately capitalized position, while paying dividends (including dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock) and repurchasing and redeeming excess capital stock. Throughout 2017, the Bank continued to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock. Additional informationInformation regarding the Bank’sour dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.”

Products and Services

Advances. We offer our members and housing associates a wide array of fixed and adjustable rate loans, called advances, that are secured with maturities ranging from one day to 30 years.eligible mortgage loans and other collateral. Our advance products are designed to help members and housing associates compete effectively in their markets and meet the credit needs of their communities. For members and housing associates that choose to retain the mortgage loans they originate as assets (portfolio lenders), advances serve as a funding source for a variety of conforming and nonconforming mortgage loans, including multifamily mortgage loans. As a result, advances support an array of housing market segments, including those focused on low- and moderate-income households. For members or housing associates that sell or securitize mortgage loans and other assets, advances can provide interim funding.

Our credit products also help members and housing associates with their asset-liability management. Members and housing associates can use a wide range of advance types, with different maturities and payment characteristics, to match the characteristics of their assets and reduce their interest rate risk. We offer advances that are callable at the member's or housing associate’s option and advances with embedded option features (such as caps and floors), which can reduce the interest rate risk associated with holding fixed rate mortgage loans and adjustable rate mortgage loans with interest rate caps in the member's portfolio.

We offer both standard and customized advance structures. Standard advances include fixed and adjustable rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, and payment characteristics. Fixed rate advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Adjustable rate advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 10 years, with the interest rates resetting periodically at a fixed spread to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or to anothera specified index. Customized advances may include:
advances with non-standard indices;
advances with embedded option features (such as interest rate caps, floors, and call and put options);
amortizing advances; and
advances with partialfull prepayment symmetry. (Partial(Full prepayment symmetry is a product feature under which the Bankwe may charge a prepayment fee or pay a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, if the advance is prepaid.)

For each customized advance, we typically execute a derivative to enable us to offset the customized features embedded in the advance.

We manage the credit risk of advances and other credit products by setting the credit and collateral terms available to individual members and housing associates based on their creditworthiness and the quality and value of the assets

3


Table of Contents


they pledge as collateral. We also have procedures to assess the mortgage loan quality and documentation standards of institutions that pledge mortgage loan collateral. In addition, we have collateral policies and restricted lending procedures in place to help manage our exposure to institutions that experience difficulty in meeting their capital requirements or other standards of creditworthiness. These credit and collateral policies balance our dual goals of meeting the needs of members and housing associates as a reliable source of liquidity and mitigating credit risk by adjusting credit and collateral terms in view of changes in member creditworthiness.

All advances must be fully collateralized. To secure advances, borrowers may pledge one- to four-family first lien residential mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, MBS, U.S. government and agency securities, deposits in the Bank, and certain other real estate-related collateral, such as commercial real estate loans and second lien residential mortgage loans. We may also accept small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) as eligible collateral from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as a type of collateral that we may accept from community financial institutions. The Housing Act defined community financial institutions as depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with average total assets over the preceding three-year period of $1 billion or less, to be adjusted for inflation annually by the Finance Agency. The average total asset cap for 2017 was $1,148 million.

Pursuant to our lending agreements with our borrowers, including members, housing associates, and nonmember institutions with credit outstanding, we limit extensions of credit to a borrower to a percentage of the market value or unpaid principal balance of the borrower’s pledged collateral, known as the borrowing capacity. The borrowing capacity percentage varies according to several factors, including the charter type of the institution, the collateral type, the value assigned to the collateral, the results of our collateral field review of the borrower’s collateral, the pledging method used for loan collateral (specific identification or blanket lien), the amount of loan data provided (detailed or summary reporting), the data reporting frequency (monthly or quarterly), the borrower’s financial strength and condition, and any institution-specific collateral risks. Under the terms of our lending agreements, the aggregate borrowing capacity of a borrower’s pledged eligible collateral must meet or exceed the total amount of the borrower’s outstanding advances, other extensions of credit, and certain other borrower obligations and liabilities. We monitor each borrower’s aggregate borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis, by comparing the institution's borrowing capacity to its obligations to us.

In addition, the total amount of advances made available to each member or housing associate may be limited by the financing availability assigned by the Bank, which is generally expressed as a percentage of the member’s or housing associate’s assets. The amount of financing availability is generally determined by the creditworthiness of the member or housing associate.

We regularly review and adjust our lending parameters in light of changing market conditions, both negative and positive, and periodically adjust the maximum borrowing capacity of certain collateral types. When necessary, we require additional collateral to fully secure advances.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, our credit analyses of our borrowers' financial condition, and our credit extension and collateral policies, we expect to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the advances. Therefore, no allowance for losses on advances was deemed necessary by the Bank in 2017. We have never experienced any credit losses on advances.

When a borrower prepays an advance prior to its original maturity, we may charge the borrower a prepayment fee, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, at the time the advance is prepaid. For an advance with partial prepayment symmetry, we may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the member a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances at the time the advance is prepaid. Our prepayment fee policy is designed to recover at least the net economic costs, if any, associated with the reinvestment of the advance prepayment proceeds or the cost to terminate the funding associated with the prepaid advance, which generally enables us to be financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance.

4


Table of Contents


Because of the funding alternatives available to our largest borrowers, we establish advances prices that take into account the cost of alternative market choices available to our largest members each day.day, along with our costs of conducting business and our profitability. We offer the same advances prices to all members and housing associates each day, which means that all members and housing associates benefit from this pricing strategy. In addition, if further price concessions are negotiated with any member or housing associate to reflect market conditions on a given day, those price concessions are also made available to all members and housing associates for the same product with the same terms on the same day.

Standby Letters of Credit. We issue standby letters of credit to support certain obligations of members to third parties. Members may use standby letters of credit issued by the Bank to facilitate residential housing finance and community lending, to achieve liquidity and asset-liability management goals, to secure certain state and local agency deposits, and to provide credit support to certain tax-exempt bonds. Our underwriting and collateral requirements for standby letters of credit are generally the same as our underwriting and collateral requirements for advances but may differ in cases where member creditworthiness is impaired.

Investments. We invest in high-quality non-MBS investments to facilitate our role as a cost-effective provider of credit and liquidity to members and to enhance the Bank'sour earnings. We have adopted credit policies and exposure limits for investments that support liquidity and diversification of risk. These policies restrict the amounts and terms of our investments according to our own capital position as well as the capital and creditworthiness of the individual counterparties, with different unsecured credit limit policies for members and nonmembers. When we execute non-MBS investments with members, we may give consideration to their secured credit availability with the Bank and our advances price levels.

We may invest in short-term unsecured interest-bearing deposits, Federal funds sold, negotiable certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. We may also invest in U.S. Treasury obligations as well as short-term secured transactions, such as U.S. Treasury resale agreements. Our investments also include bonds issued by the Federal Farm Credit Banks, all of which are rated Aaa by Moody’s and AA+ by S&P. In addition, we may invest in housing finance agency bonds issued by housing finance agencies located in Arizona, California, and Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of the FHLBank System. These bonds are federally taxable mortgage revenue bonds, collateralized by pools of first lien residential mortgage loans and credit-enhanced by bond insurance. The bonds we hold are issued by the California Housing Finance Agency.

In addition, our investments include PLRMBS, all of which were AAA-rated at the time of purchase, and agency residential MBS, which are guaranteed through the direct obligation of, or are supported by, the U.S. government.government, and PLRMBS. Some of these PLRMBS were issued by and/or purchased from members, former members, or their respective affiliates. We execute all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. The Bank hasWe have not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of 2008.

Additional information about our investments and OTTI charges associated with our PLRMBS is provided in “Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 74Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.Investments.

Mortgage Loans. Under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program, the Bank may purchasewe purchased from members, for itsour own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) under the MPF Government product. In addition, the Bank may facilitatewe facilitated the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgageproduct. When members sold loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product;Xtra product, the loans were sold to a third-party investor and were not recorded on our Statements of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage

5


Table of Contents

loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product.Condition. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance,” “MPF,” and “MPF Xtra” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

The Bank has approved 23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in On December 17, 2020, we announced that we would no longer offer new commitments to directly purchase, or to facilitate the MPF Program in 2013. We previously purchased conventional conforming fixed rate residentialpurchase of, mortgage loans from participating financial institutions from May 2002our members. On March 31, 2021, we closed all remaining open commitments to October 2006. Thepurchase mortgage loans for our own portfolio under the MPF Program allows us to further serveOriginal product, and by June 30, 2021, we no longer facilitated the needspurchase of our members by offering them a competitive alternative secondary market channel for their mortgage originations. Theloans under the MPF Government and MPF Government MBS products also allow us to offer members a new mechanism to help low- and moderate-income homeowners and first-time homebuyers.Xtra product.

4

Table of Contents

Affordable Housing Program. Through our Affordable Housing Program (AHP), we provide subsidies to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Each year, to fund the AHP, we set aside 10% of theour current year'syear’s net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP), to be awarded in the following year. Since 1990, we have awarded $1.0approximately $1.2 billion in AHP subsidies to support the purchase, development, or rehabilitation of approximately 132,000 affordable homes.

145,500 housing units.
We allocate at least 65% of our annual AHP subsidy to our competitive AHP, under which applications for specific owner-occupied and rental housing projects are submitted by members and are evaluated and scored by the Bank in an annual competitive process. All subsidies for the competitive AHP are funded to affordable housing sponsors or developers through our members in the form of direct subsidies or subsidized advances.

We allocate the remainder of our annual AHP subsidy, up to 35%, to our two homeownership set-aside programs, the Individual Development and Empowerment Account Program and the Workforce Initiative Subsidy for Homeownership Program.programs. Under these programs, members reserve funds from the Bank to be used as matching grants for eligible first-time homebuyers.

Access to Housing and Economic Assistance for Development (AHEAD) Program. AHEAD Program grants, funded annually at the discretion of our Boardboard of Directors,directors, provide funding for targeted economic development projects and non-AHP-eligible housing initiatives that create or preserve jobs, deliver social services, training, or education programs, or provide other services and programs that benefit low- and moderate-income communities. AHEAD Program applications are submitted by members working with local community groups, and awards are based on project eligibility and evaluation of the applications. In 2017, the Bank2021, we awarded $1.5 million in AHEAD Program grants, and since 2004, we have awarded $20.5 million in AHEAD program grants.

Discounted Credit Programs. We offer members two discounted credit programs available in the form of advances and standby letters of credit. Members may use the Community Investment Program to fund mortgages for low- and moderate-income households, to finance first-time homebuyer programs, to create and maintain affordable housing, and to support other eligible lending activities related to housing or economic development for low- and moderate-income families. Members may use the Advances for Community Enterprise (ACE) Program to fund projects and activities that create or retain jobs or provide services or other benefits for low- and moderate-income people and communities. Members may also use ACE Program funds to support eligible community lending and economic development, including small business, community facilities, and public works projects.

Funding Sources

We obtain most of our funds from the sale of the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ debt instruments (consolidated obligations), which consist of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes. The consolidated obligations are issued through the Office of Finance using authorized securities dealers and are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The regulations provide a

6


Table of Contents

general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2016 – Commitments and Contingencies.” We have never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2017, and through the date of this report, we do not believe that it is probable that we will be asked to do so.

The Bank’sOur status as a GSE is critical to maintaining its access to the capital markets. Although consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks and are not guaranteed by the U.S. government, the capital markets have traditionally treated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as comparablea close alternative to federal agency debt, providing the FHLBanks with access to funding at relatively favorable rates. As of December 31, 2017,2021, S&P rated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations AA+/A-1+, and Moody’s rated them Aaa/P-1. As of December 31, 2017,2021, S&P assigned each of the FHLBanks a long-term credit rating of AA+ with a stable outlook, and Moody's
5

Table of Contents

assigned each of the FHLBanks a long-term credit rating of Aaa with a stable outlook. Changes in the long-term credit ratings of individual FHLBanks do not necessarily affect the credit rating of the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the FHLBanks. Rating agencies may change or withdraw a rating from time to time because of various factors, including operating results or actions taken, business developments, or changes in their opinion regarding, among other factors, the general outlook for a particular industry or the economy.

Regulations govern the issuance of debt on behalf of the FHLBanks and related activities. All new debt is jointly issued by the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance, which serves as their fiscal agent in accordance with the FHLBank Act and applicable regulations. Pursuant to these regulations, the Office of Finance, often in conjunction with the FHLBanks, has adopted policies and procedures for consolidated obligations that may be issued by the FHLBanks. The policies and procedures relate to the frequency and timing of issuance, issue size, minimum denomination, selling concessions, underwriter qualifications and selection, currency of issuance, interest rate change or conversion features, call or put features, principal amortization features, and selection of clearing organizations and outside counsel. The Office of Finance has responsibility for facilitating and approving the issuance of the consolidated obligations in accordance with these policies and procedures. In addition, the Office of Finance has the authority to redirect, limit, or prohibit the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ requests to issue consolidated obligations that are otherwise allowed by its policies and procedures if it determines that its action is consistent with: (i) the regulatory requirement that consolidated obligations be issued efficiently and at the lowest all-in cost over time, consistent with prudent risk management practices, prudent debt parameters, short- and long-term market conditions, and the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ status as GSEs; (ii) maintaining reliable access to the short-term and long-term capital markets; and (iii) positioning the issuance of debt to take advantage of current and future capital markets opportunities. The authority of the Office of Finance to redirect, limit, or prohibit the Bank'sour requests for issuance of consolidated obligations has never adversely affected the Bank'sour ability to finance its operations. The Office of Finance also services all outstanding FHLBank debt, serves as a source of information for the FHLBanks on developments in the capital markets, and prepares the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ quarterly and annual combined financial reports. In addition, it administers the Resolution Funding Corporation, and the Financing Corporation, two corporations established by Congress in the 1980s1989 to provide funding for the resolution and disposition of insolvent savings institutions.

Consolidated Obligation Bonds. Consolidated obligations are generally issued with either fixed rate payment terms or adjustable rate payment terms, which use a variety of indicesthe Secured Overnight Financing Rate for interest rate resets, including LIBOR.resets. In addition, to meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed rate and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain certain embedded features, which may result in call options and complex coupon payment terms. In general, when such consolidated obligation bonds are issued for which the Bank iswe are the primary obligor, we simultaneously enter into interest rate exchange agreements containing offsetting features to, in effect, convert the terms of the bond to the terms of a simple adjustable rate bond (tied to an index, such as those listed above).bond. Typically, the maturities of these securitiesconsolidated obligation bonds range from 6 months to 15 years, but the maturities are not subject to any statutory or regulatory limit. Consolidated obligation bonds may be issued and distributed daily through negotiated or competitively bid transactions with approved underwriters or selling group members.

7


Table of Contents

We receive 100% of the net proceeds of a bond issued through direct negotiation with underwriters of debt when we are the only FHLBank involved in the negotiation. In these cases, the Bank iswe are the sole primary obligor on the consolidated obligation bond. When the Bankwe and one or more other FHLBanks jointly negotiate the issuance of a bond directly with underwriters, we receive the portion of the proceeds of the bond agreed upon with the other FHLBank(s); in those cases, the Bank iswe are the primary obligor for a pro rata portion of the bond, including all customized features and terms, based on the proceeds received.

We may also request specific amounts of specific consolidated obligation bonds to be offered by the Office of Finance for sale in a competitive auction conducted with the underwriters in a bond selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of those same bonds to be offered for sale for their benefit in the same auction. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the bonds issued in a competitive auction depending on: (i) the amounts of and costs for the consolidated obligation bonds bid by underwriters; (ii) the maximum costs we or other FHLBanks participating in the same issue, if any, are willing to pay for the bonds; and (iii) guidelines for the allocation of bond proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

6

Table of Contents

Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes. The FHLBanks also issue consolidated obligation discount notes with maturities ranging from one day to one year, which may be offered daily through a consolidated obligation discount note selling group and through other authorized underwriters. Discount notes are issued at a discount and mature at par.

On a daily basis, we may request specific amounts of discount notes with specific maturity dates to be offered by the Office of Finance at a specific cost for sale to underwriters in the discount note selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of discount notes with the same maturities to be offered for sale for their benefit the same day. The Office of Finance commits to issue discount notes on behalf of the participating FHLBanks when underwriters in the selling group submit orders for the specific discount notes offered for sale. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the discount notes issued through this sales process depending on: (i) the maximum costs we or other FHLBanks participating in the same discount note issuance, if any, are willing to pay for the discount notes; (ii) the order amounts for the discount notes submitted by underwriters; and (iii) guidelines for the allocation of discount note proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

Twice weekly, we may also request specific amounts of discount notes with fixed terms to maturity ranging from 4 to 26 weeks to be offered by the Office of Finance for sale in a competitive auction conducted with underwriters in the discount note selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of those same discount notes to be offered for sale for their benefit in the same auction. The discount notes offered for sale in a competitive auction are not subject to a limit on the maximum costs the FHLBanks are willing to pay. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the discount notes issued in a competitive auction depending on: (i) the amounts of and costs for the discount notes bid by underwriters and (ii) guidelines for the allocation of discount note proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

Debt Investor Base. The FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations have traditionally had a diversified funding base of domestic and foreign investors. Purchasers of the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations include fund managers, commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, foreign central banks, state and local governments, and retail investors. These purchasers are also diversified geographically, with a significant portion of investors historically located in the United States, Europe, and Asia.

Segment Information

We use an analysis of the Bank’sour financial results based on the financial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to the operations of these two business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes interest income and expensesexpense associated with net settlements from economic hedges that

8


Table of Contents

are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” in other income/(loss), excludes interest income and expense associated with changes in fair value from fair value hedges that are recorded in the same line as the earning effect of the hedged item, and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI charges on our PLRMBS or other expenses andAHP assessments isare not included in the segment reporting analysis but isare incorporated into our overall assessment of financial performance.

The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging instruments, liquidity and other non-MBS investments associated with our role as a liquidity provider, and capital stock. Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on all assets associated with the business activity in this segment and the cost of funding those activities, including the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements, and from earnings on invested capital.

attributed to our capital stock and retained earnings.
The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the MPF Program, the consolidated obligations specifically identified as funding those assets, and the related hedging instruments. Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on the
7

Table of Contents

MBS and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets. This includes the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements and net accretion of related income, which is a result of improvement in expected cash flows on certain PLRMBS that were other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS,prior to January 1, 2020, less the provision for credit losses on mortgage loans.

loans and MBS.
Additional information about business segments is provided in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Segment Information” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1713 – Segment Information.”

Use of Interest Rate Exchange Agreements

We use interest rate exchange agreements, also known as derivatives, in the ordinary course of business as part of our risk management and funding strategies to reduce funding costs and interest rate risk inherent in the ordinary course of business.and lower funding costs. The types of derivatives we may use include interest rate swaps (including callable, putable, and basis swaps); swaptions; and interest rate cap and floor agreements.

The regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks and the Bank'sour Risk Management Policy establish standards and guidelines for our use of derivatives. These regulationsstandards and guidelines prohibit trading in derivatives for profit and any other speculative purposes and limit the amount of credit risk allowable from derivative counterparties.

We primarily use derivatives to manage our exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates. The goal of our market risk management strategy is not to eliminate market risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits that are consistent with the financial strategies approved by the Boardboard of Directors.directors. One key way we manage market risk is to acquire and maintain a portfolio of assets and liabilities, which, together with their associated derivatives, are conservativelygenerally matched with respect to the expected repricingsrepricing of the assets and the liabilities. We may also use derivatives to adjust the effective repricing frequency or option characteristics ofembedded in certain financial instruments (such as advances and consolidated obligations) to achieve our risk management objectives.

We measure the Bank’sour market risk at the enterprisetotal Bank level, as well as on a portfolio basis, taking into account all financial instruments. The market risk of the derivatives and the hedged items is included in the measurement of our various market risk measures. The Bank’sOur low interest ratemarket risk profile reflects our conservative asset-liability mix, which is supported by integrated use of derivatives in our daily financial management.

Additional information about our interest rate exchange agreements is provided in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Market Risk – Total Bank Market Risk – Interest Rate Exchange Agreements” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1814 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”


9


Table of Contents

Capital

From its enactment in 1932, the FHLBank Act provided for a subscription-based capital structure for the FHLBanks. The amount of capital stock that each FHLBank issued was determined by a statutory formula establishing how much FHLBank capital stock each member was required to purchase. With the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, Congress replaced the statutory subscription-based member capital stock purchase formula with requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital for the FHLBanks and required the FHLBanks to develop new capital plans to replace the previous statutory structure.

We implemented ourOur capital plan on April 1, 2004.has been amended over time to accommodate changes in our business model and financial strategies. The capital plan bases the stock purchase requirement on the level of activity a member has with the Bank, subject to a minimum membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having access to the Bank as a funding source. With the approval of the Boardour board of Directors,directors, we may adjust these requirements from time to time within the ranges established in the capital plan. Any changes to our capital plan must be approved by our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and the Finance Agency.
8

Table of Contents
Bank
Our capital stock cannot be publicly traded, and under the capital plan, may be issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased only at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. Under the capital plan, a member'smember’s capital stock will be redeemed by the Bank upon five years'years’ notice from the member, subject to certain conditions. In addition, we have the discretion to repurchase excess capital stock from members.

Dividends and Retained Earnings. The Bank’sOur Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) summarizes the Bank’sour capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices with respect to restricted retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock.

As required by the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, the Framework is reviewed at least annually by the Bank’s Boardour board of Directors.directors. The Boardboard of Directorsdirectors may amend the Framework from time to time. In January 2017, theThe Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to include the Bank’sincludes a dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate are at the discretion of the Bank’s Boardour board of Directors,directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration. The Bank’sOur historical dividend rates and the dividend philosophy are not indicative of future dividend declarations. The Bank’sOur dividend policy may be revised or eliminated in the future, and there can be no assurance as to future dividends.

In accordance with the Framework, the Bank retainswe retain certain amounts in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available for dividends in the current dividend period, and maintainsmaintain an amount of total retained earnings at least equal to its required retained earnings as described in the Framework. The BankWe may be restricted from paying dividends if itthe Bank is not in compliance with any of itsour minimum capital requirements or if payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of itsour minimum capital requirements. In addition, the Bankwe may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligation has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, or, under certain circumstances, if the Bank failswe fail to satisfy certain liquidity requirements under applicable regulations.

The regulatory liquidity requirements state that each FHLBank must: (i) maintain eligible high quality assets (advances with a maturity not exceeding five years, U.S. Treasury securities investments, and deposits in banks or trust companies) in an amount equal to or greater than the deposits received from members, and (ii) hold contingent liquidity in an amount sufficient to meet its liquidity needs for at least five business days without access to the consolidated obligations markets. At December 31, 2017, advances maturing within five years totaled $76.6 billion, significantly in excess of the $281 million of member deposits on that date. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, the Bank held estimated total sources of funds in an amount that would have allowed the Bank to meet its liquidity needs for more than five consecutive business days without issuing new consolidated obligations, subject to certain conditions. For more information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Liquidity Risk.”

10


Table of Contents

The Bank’sOur Risk Management Policy limits the payment of dividends based on the ratio of the Bank’sour estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is less than 100% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)Federal funds effective rate for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and if this ratio is less than 70%, the Bankwe would be restricted from paying a dividend. For more information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Market Risk.”

Restricted Retained Earnings – The Bank’sOur Framework assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period. Priorperiod, and maintains an amount of total retained earnings at least equal to July 2017,our required retained earnings as described in the Bank’s FrameworkFramework. As determined using our methodology, the required level of total retained earnings had three categoriesranged from $1.5 billion to $2.9 billion during 2020 and 2021. The methodology may be revised from time to time, and the required level of required retained earnings under the methodology may change due to updating data and assumptions used in the methodology. In January 2022, the required level of retained earnings was increased from $1.5 billion to $1.7 billion. We satisfy our retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount)earnings (i.e., andamounts related to the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE(JCE) Agreement). In 2011, and unrestricted retained earnings. Our retained earnings requirement may be changed at any time. The board of directors periodically reviews the FHLBanks entered into aretained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate.
The JCE Agreement is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank by allocating a portion of each FHLBank’s earnings to a separate retained earnings account at that FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to allocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of the account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least 1% of that FHLBank’sFHLBank's average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previouscalendar quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends. UnderWith the Framework, the Bank’s required amount ofdecline in consolidated obligations outstanding in 2020, we ceased contributions to restricted retained earnings was determined usingin the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined usingfourth quarter of 2020, in accordance with the Bank’s methodology, from July 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’sJCE Agreement; and no further allocations of net income into restricted retained earnings are required until such time as the allocation requirement was $2,000, and from January 2017 to July 2017,exceeds the Bank’sbalance of
9

Table of Contents

restricted retained earnings. Additionally, the JCE Agreement provides that amounts in restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.

In July 2017, the Bank’s Boardin excess of Directors approved the transfer150% of all amounts classified asour restricted retained earnings other than the amounts related to the JCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change related to the transfer, the Bank’s Boardminimum (i.e., 1% of Directors amended the Framework to eliminate twoour total consolidated obligations calculated as of the categorieslast day of each calendar quarter) may be released from restricted retained earnings (Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the Bank’s retained earnings methodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance, and business growth. In January 2018, the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of total retained earnings of $2,500. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCE Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

The Bank’s retained earnings requirement may be changed at any time. The Board of Directors periodically reviews the retained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate.

Dividend Payments – Finance Agency rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. There is no requirement that the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

In addition, Finance Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess
capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’sour capital plan. Additional information about our capital, including dividends and retained earnings, is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.”


11


Table of Contents

Competition

Demand for Bankour advances is affected by many factors, including the availability and cost of other sources of funding for members, including retail and brokered deposits. We also compete with our members' other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. These suppliers may include securities dealers, commercial banks, and other FHLBanks for members with affiliated institutions that are members of other FHLBanks.

Under the FHLBank Act and regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, affiliated institutions in different FHLBank districts may be members of different FHLBanks. Members may have access to alternative funding sources through sales of securities under agreements to resell. Some members, particularly larger members, may have access to many more funding alternatives, including independent access to the national and global credit markets. The availability of alternative funding sources for members can significantly influence the demand for our advances and can vary as a result of many factors, including market conditions, members' creditworthiness, members' strategic objectives, and the availability of collateral.

Our ability to compete successfully for the advances business of our members depends primarily on our advances prices, ability to fund advances through the issuance of consolidated obligations at competitive rates, credit and collateral terms, prepayment terms, product features such as embedded option features, ability to meet members' specific requests on a timely basis, capital stock requirements, retained earnings policy, excess capital stock repurchase policies, and dividends.

In addition, the FHLBanks compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs, as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities, for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs or lower amounts of debt issued at the same cost.

Regulatory Oversight, Audits, and Examinations

The FHLBanks are supervised and regulated by the Finance Agency, an independent agency in the executive branch of the U.S. government. The Finance Agency is also responsible for supervising and regulating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Finance Agency is supported entirely by assessments from the FHLBanks, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. With respect to the FHLBanks, the Finance Agency is charged with ensuring that the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets, and operate in a safe and sound manner. The Finance Agency also establishes regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Finance Agency has broad supervisory authority over the FHLBanks, including, but not limited to, the power to suspend or remove any entity-affiliated party (including any director, officer, or employee) of an FHLBank who violates certain laws or commits certain other acts; to issue and serve a notice of charges upon an FHLBank or any entity-affiliated party; to obtain a cease and desist order, or a temporary cease and desist order, to stop or prevent any unsafe or unsound practice or violation of law, order, rule, regulation, or condition imposed in writing; to issue civil money penalties against an FHLBank or an entity-affiliated party; to require an FHLBank to take certain actions, or refrain from certain actions, under the prompt corrective action provisions that authorize or require the Finance Agency to take certain supervisory actions, including the appointment of a conservator or receiver for an FHLBank under certain conditions; and to require any one or more of the FHLBanks to repay the primary obligations of another FHLBank on outstanding consolidated obligations.

Pursuant to the Housing Act, the Finance Agency exercises prompt corrective action authority over the FHLBanks. The Capital Classification and Prompt Corrective Action rule establishes the criteria for each of the following capital classifications for the FHLBanks specified in the Housing Act: adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Under the rule, unless the Finance Agency has reclassified an FHLBank based on factors other than its capital levels, an FHLBank is adequately capitalized if it has sufficient total and permanent capital to meet or exceed both its risk-based and minimum capital requirements;

12


Table of Contents

is undercapitalized if it fails to meet one or more of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements, but is not significantly undercapitalized; is significantly undercapitalized if its total or permanent capital is less than 75% of what is required to meet any of its requirements, but it is not critically undercapitalized; and is critically undercapitalized if its total capital is equal to or less than 2% of its total assets.

By letter dated December 11, 2017, the Director of the Finance Agency notified the Bank that, based on September 30, 2017, financial information, the Bank met the definition of adequately capitalized under the Finance Agency's Capital Classification and Prompt Corrective Action rule.

The Housing Act and Finance Agency regulations govern capital distributions by an FHLBank, which include cash dividends, capital stock dividends, capital stock repurchases, or any transaction in which the FHLBank purchases or retires any instrument included in its capital. Under the Housing Act and Finance Agency regulations, an FHLBank may not make a capital distribution if after doing so it would not be adequately capitalized or would be reclassified to a lower capital classification, or if such distribution violates any statutory or regulatory restriction, and, in the case of a significantly undercapitalized FHLBank, an FHLBank may not make any capital distribution without approval from the Director of the Finance Agency.

To assess the safety and soundness of the Bank, the Finance Agency conducts an annual on-site examination of the Bank and other periodic reviews of its financial operations. In addition, we are required to submit information on our financial condition and results of operations each month to the Finance Agency.

Finance Agency regulations require that the Bank’s strategic business plan describe how our business activities will achieve our mission, consistent with the Finance Agency’s core mission assets (CMA) guidance. The Finance Agency will assess annually each FHLBank’s core mission achievement by determining the ratio of primary mission assets, which includes the average par balances of advances and mortgage loans acquired from members, to the average par balance of consolidated obligations. Our core mission activities primarily include the issuance of advances. In addition, we acquire member assets through the MPF program. The Bank’s CMA ratio was 74.06% for the year ended December 31, 2017, which exceeded the Finance Agency’s recommended minimum ratio of 70%.

The Bank’s capital stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Section 12(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) and, as a result, we are required to comply with the disclosure and
10

Table of Contents

reporting requirements of the 1934 Act and to file annual, quarterly, and current reports with the SEC, as well as meet other SEC requirements.

Our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has an audit committee, and we have an internal audit department. An independent registered public accounting firm audits our annual financial statements. The independent registered public accounting firm conducts these audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Like other federally chartered corporations, the FHLBanks are subject to general congressional oversight. Each FHLBank must submit annual management reports to Congress, the President, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Comptroller General. These reports include a statement of financial condition, a statement of operations, a statement of cash flows, a statement of internal accounting and administrative control systems, and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been given regulatory authority over derivative transactions pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the FHLBanks are subject to the rules promulgated by the CFTC with respect to their derivatives activities. These rules affect all aspects of the Bank’sour derivatives activities by establishing requirements relating to derivatives recordkeeping and reporting, clearing, execution, and margining of uncleared derivative transactions.

The Comptroller General has authority under the FHLBank Act to audit or examine the Finance Agency and the FHLBanks and to determine the extent to which they fairly and effectively fulfill the purposes of the FHLBank Act.

13


Table of Contents

Furthermore, the Government Corporations Control Act provides that the Comptroller General may review any audit of the financial statements conducted by an independent registered public accounting firm. If the Comptroller General conducts such a review, then he or she must report the results and provide his or her recommendations to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget, and the relevant FHLBank. The Comptroller General may also conduct his or her own audit of any financial statements of an FHLBank.

The U.S. Treasury, or a permitted designee, is authorized under the combined provisions of the Government Corporations Control Act and the FHLBank Act to prescribe: the form, denomination, maturity, interest rate, and conditions to which FHLBank debt will be subject; the way and time FHLBank debt is issued; and the price for which FHLBank debt will be sold. The U.S. Treasury may purchase FHLBank debt up to an aggregate principal amount of $4.0 billion pursuant to the standards and terms of the FHLBank Act.

Human Capital Resources
AllOur human capital significantly contributes to the Bank’s success in achieving strategic business objectives. In managing our human capital, we focus on our workforce profile and the various programs and philosophies described below.
Workforce Profile – Our workforce is primarily comprised of corporate employees, with our principal operations centralized in one location. As of December 31, 2021, we had 297 employees. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 43.8% of our workforce identify as female, 55.9% identify as male, and 0.3% declined to state a gender. Approximately 66.3% of our workforce identify as an ethnic minority, and 1.0% declined to state an ethnicity. As of December 31, 2021, the average tenure of our employees was 8.4 years. Our overall turnover rate for 2021 was 13.1%. We strive to both develop talent within the organization and to supplement our talent pool with external hires. We believe that developing internal talent results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes engagement and commitment among our employees, which advances and broadens the overall success of the FHLBanks' financial institution membersorganization. Attracting new talent contributes to fresh perspectives, new ideas, continuous improvement, and our goal of supporting a diverse and inclusive workforce. There are subjectno collective bargaining agreements with our employees.
Total Rewards – To achieve our strategic business initiatives and enhance business performance, we seek to attract, develop, and retain talented employees. We accomplish this through a combination of development programs and benefits, and by recognizing and rewarding performance. Specifically, our programs include:
Cash compensation that includes a competitive base salary and performance-based incentives;
Benefits:
11

Table of Contents

Health insurance, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, supplemental life insurance, 401(k) retirement savings plan with employer match, pension benefits, healthcare concierge;
Wellness program, including a wellness reimbursement, employee assistance program, and interactive education sessions;
Time away from work, including time off for vacation, illness, federal or state lawsholidays, and regulations,volunteer opportunities;
Culture: includes employee resource groups, various cultural diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and a mentorship program;
Work/Life balance: includes paid salary continuation for short-term disability, parental, military, and bereavement leave, and jury duty;
Development programs and training: leadership development, competency knowledge center learning modules, tuition reimbursement program, internal and external educational and development opportunities, relevant to employees’ job responsibilities; and
Management succession planning: our board of directors and leadership actively engage in management succession planning, with a review of our senior management team at least annually.
Our performance management framework includes goal setting and an annual performance review process. Overall annual ratings are calibrated across the leadership team, with base salary and incentive recommendations differentiated based upon employee contributions and overall performance.
We are committed to the health, safety, and wellness of our employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented significant changes to these laws or regulations orour operating environment, safety protocols, and procedures that we determined were in the best interest of our employees and members, and in compliance with government regulations. This includes ensuring all employees are able to related policies might adversely or favorably affectwork remotely when needed and implementing additional safety measures for employees to perform critical on-site work.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Program – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is a strategic business priority for the businessBank. Our Chief Diversity Officer is a member of the FHLBanks.senior management team, reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer, and serves as a liaison to the board of directors. We recognize that diversity increases our capacity for innovation and creativity and that inclusion allows us to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthens our retention efforts. We operationalize our commitment through the development and execution of a three-year DEI Strategic Plan that includes quantifiable metrics to measure its success, and we report regularly on these metrics to management and the board of directors. Additionally, we offer a range of opportunities for our employees to connect and grow personally and professionally through our Enterprise Diversity Committee, Workforce DEI Plan, and employee resource groups. We consider learning an important component of our DEI Strategic Plan and regularly offer educational opportunities to our employees and evaluate inclusive behaviors as part of our annual performance management process.

Available Information

The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains all electronically filed or furnishedSEC reports, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments. On our website at www.fhlbsf.com, we provide a link to the page on the SEC website that lists all of these reports. These reports may also be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. (Further information about the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained at 1-800-SEC-0330.) In addition, we provide direct links from our website to our annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q on the SEC website as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing the reports to the SEC. (Note: The website addresses of the SEC and the Bank have been included as inactive textual references only. Information on those websites is not part of this report.)


Employees
12


Table of Contents
We had 287 employees at December 31, 2017. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

ITEM 1A.ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

The following discussion summarizes certain of the risks and uncertainties that the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank)(Bank, we, our, us) faces. The list is not exhaustive and there may be other risks and uncertainties that are not described below that may also affect our business. Any of these risks or uncertainties, if realized, could negatively affect our financial condition or results of operations or limit our ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Market, Financial, and Economic Risks
Economic weaknessNatural disasters, pandemics, terrorist attacks, or other catastrophic events could adversely affect our operations, business activities, results of operations, and financial condition.
Natural disasters, widespread public health emergencies (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), terrorist attacks, civil unrest, or other unanticipated or catastrophic events could create economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties, which may lead to reduced demand for advances and an increased risk of credit losses for the Bank and may adversely affect its cost of funding or access to funding. While it is difficult to predict the future demand for advances, advances may remain at reduced levels or decline further if the level of liquidity in the financial markets and deposit levels at members remain elevated or if another economic downturn occurs. These events may also lead to operational difficulties that could adversely affect the businessability of manythe Bank and the Office of our membersFinance to conduct and manage their businesses. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business activities and results of operations.

Our businessIn particular, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the credit markets in which the Bank operates, and resultsthe decline in interest rates has adversely affected the fair values of operations are sensitive to conditionsour assets, the valuation of collateral, and our net income and capital. Despite significant improvements in the housingoverall U.S. economy since the initial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, uncertainty remains around the pace of the recovery going forward, given concerns about virus resurgence from variants, vaccine distribution and mortgage markets, as well as general businessvaccination rates, inflation, and supply chain disruptions. In addition, because of changing economic and market conditions affecting our investments, we may be required to recognize further impairments on securities held, which may result in additional provision for credit losses or write-downs on private label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) or reduced comprehensive income, depending on the classification of the investment. A prolonged COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have adverse effects on our profitability and financial condition. Market volatility and economic conditions. While economic conditions improved and credit standards eased in 2017, geopolitical instability, trade disruptions, orstress during a sustained capital market correction could weaken consumer and business confidence and depress personal consumption and business investment. These factors could, in turn, adversely affect overall economic and housing market conditions. If economic and housing market conditions deteriorate, the Bank’s business and results of operations could be adversely affected.


14


Table of Contents

Adverse trends in the mortgage lending sector, including declines in housing prices or deterioration in loan performance trends, could trigger a reduction in the value of collateral pledged to the Bank to secure member credit and in the fair value of the Bank’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) investments.

Changing economic conditions may slow or reverse home price appreciation experienced since 2012 and negatively affect the Bank’s MBS and mortgage loan portfolios, adversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Gains in home price appreciation were led, in part, by highly accommodative global monetary policy and an improving employment market. However, there can be no assurance that these conditions will continue. The rebound in developed market economies may lead global central banks to pull back from negative nominal and real rates. GSE reform could substantially raise the cost of secondary market mortgage financing. Recent tax changes have reduced the tax incentive for home ownership slightly. A significant decline in housing prices could adversely affect the Bank’s private-label residential MBS (PLRMBS) and mortgage loan portfolio, whichprolonged COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our access to the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations,debt markets and potentially affect our liquidity. Our decision to have all employees work remotely in accordance with local “stay-at-home” orders may create additional cyber-security risks and operational challenges that could affect our ability to pay dividends,conduct business or increase the risk of operational incidents and abilityerrors. In addition, we rely on vendors and other third parties to redeemperform certain critical services, and if one of our critical vendors or repurchase capital stock.

third parties experiences a significant failure or interruption to their business because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may be unable to effectively conduct and manage our business. The outlook remains uncertain, and although the Federal Reserve has indicated its expectations for increasing the target range for the Effective Federal Funds Rate starting in 2022, there is a possibility that if the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates low or if negative interest rates emerge, this could significantly affect our business and profitability.
Market uncertainty and volatility may adversely affect our business, profitability, or results of operations.

Adverse conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, or GSE restructuring that weakens the government’s commitment to encourage home ownershiphomeownership as a pillar of financial security, could result in a decrease in the availability of credit and liquidity within the mortgage industry, causing disruptions in the operations of mortgage originators, including some of our members. We continue to be subject to potential adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, and ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock should economic conditions significantly deteriorate.

13

Table of Contents

Weaknesses in the housing and mortgage markets may undermine the need for wholesale funding and have a negative impact on the demand for advances.

Recent changesA reduction in tax law that reduced the tax advantages to home ownership may reduce mortgage lending ator mortgage assets held by member institutions and may reduce their demand for wholesale funding. This could result in a decline in advance levels and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in or limits on our ability to access the capital markets could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our primary source of funds is the sale of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System consolidated obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, such as investor demand and liquidity in the financial markets. The sale of FHLBank System consolidated obligations can also be influenced by factors other than conditions in the capital markets, including legislative and regulatory developments and government programs and policies that affect the relative attractiveness of FHLBank System consolidated obligations. In addition, the level of dealer participation and support also affect liquidity in the agency debt markets. Based on these factors, wethe availability of funds may not be able to obtainbecome limited or terms may become less acceptable. If funding on acceptable terms. If we cannot access funding on acceptableor terms when needed,are significantly adversely affected, our ability to support and continue our operations could be adversely affected, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Limitations on the payment of dividends and repurchase of excess capital stock may adversely affect the attractiveness to members of the Bank's business model.

Our business model is based on the premise that we maintain a balance between our objective to promote housing, homeownership, and community and economic development through our activities with members and our objective to provide a return on the private capital provided by our members. We achieve this balance by delivering low-cost

15


Table of Contents

credit to help our members meet the credit needs of their communities while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank’s capital stock. Our financial strategies are designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our member base and our members' credit needs change. Our capital increases when members are required to purchase additional capital stock as they increase their advances, and it contracts when we repurchase excess capital stock from members as their advances decline. In addition, the Bank manages its retained earnings to ensure compliance with regulatory capital requirements in the event of significant growth in member business. As a result of these strategies, we have historically been able to achieve our mission by meeting member credit needs and maintaining our strong regulatory capital position while paying dividends (including dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock) and repurchasing and redeeming excess capital stock. Limitations on the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock may diminish the value of membership from the perspective of a member.

Changes in the credit ratings on FHLBank System consolidated obligations may adversely affect the cost of consolidated obligations.

FHLBank System consolidated obligations are rated Aaa/P-1 with a stable outlook by Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and AA+/A-1+ with a stable outlook by S&P Global Ratings (S&P). Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports. Because all of the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, negative developments at any FHLBank may affect these credit ratings or result in the issuance of a negative report regardless of our own financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because of the FHLBanks' GSE status, the credit ratings of the FHLBank System and the FHLBanks are generally constrained by the long-term sovereign credit rating of the United States, and any downgrade in that sovereign credit rating may result in a corresponding downgrade to the credit ratings of FHLBank System consolidated obligations. Any adverse rating change or negative report may adversely affect our cost of funds and the FHLBanks' ability to issue consolidated obligations on acceptable terms, which could also adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations or limit our ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Changes in federal fiscal and monetary policy could adversely affect our business or results of operations.

Our business and results of operations are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The Federal Reserve Board's policies directly and indirectly influence the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We realize income primarily from the spread between interest earned on our outstanding advances and investments and interest paid on our consolidated obligations and other liabilities. Although we use various methods and procedures to monitor and manage our exposure to changes in interest rates, we may experience instances when our interest-bearing liabilities will be significantly more sensitive to changes in interest rates than our interest-earning assets, or vice versa. In either case, interest rate movements contrary to our position could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. Moreover, the impact of changes in interest rates on mortgage-related assets can be exacerbated by prepayment risks, which areprepayments, with the risk that the assets will be refinanced by the obligor in low interest rate environments and the risk that the assets will remain outstanding longer than expected at below-market yields when interest rates increase.

Volatile market conditions increase the risk that our financial models will produce unreliable results.

We use market-based inputs in the financial models that we use to inform our operational decisions and to derive estimates for use in our financial reporting processes. While model inputs based on economic conditions and expectations are regularly evaluated and adjusted to changing conditions, sudden significant changes in these conditions may increase the risk that our models could produce unreliable results or estimates that vary widely or prove to be inaccurate.
Changes to and replacement of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Financial services regulators and industry groups, including the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association have evaluated and are continuing to evaluate the phase-out of LIBOR. The ARRC has settled on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasuries repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018.
16
14


Table of Contents


On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced the dates that panel bank submissions for all LIBOR settings will cease, after which representative LIBOR rates will no longer be available. The FCA confirmed that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative:
immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of all sterling, euro, Swiss franc, and Japanese yen settings, and the 1-week and 2-month US dollar settings; and
immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar settings.
Because we generally are not permitted to continue to use instruments that reference LIBOR for hedging and risk-mitigating purposes, we have had to alter our hedging strategies and interest rate risk management. While the full effects of these adjustments remain to be seen, they may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
During the third quarter of 2018, several market participants began issuing variable rate debt securities indexed to SOFR. In November 2018, the FHLBank System offered its first SOFR-indexed consolidated obligation, and we began offering SOFR-indexed advances. During 2019, we began to use derivatives indexed to SOFR to hedge interest rate risk. We have developed and are implementing a LIBOR Phase Out Transition Plan, to address LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, balance sheet management, and other related issues. Given the large volume of LIBOR-based mortgages and other LIBOR-based financial instruments in the marketplace, the basis adjustment to the replacement floating rate will receive extraordinary scrutiny. Whether the net impact will be positive or negative cannot yet be ascertained. The infrastructure changes necessary to manage the transition away from LIBOR in the markets, and corresponding adjustments to our systems, could be disruptive. We are planning for the eventual replacement of our LIBOR-indexed instruments and expect SOFR to be the dominant replacement. However, while demand for SOFR-indexed consolidated obligations has gained momentum, a robust demand for SOFR-indexed advances has yet to develop. Among other factors, demand for SOFR-indexed financial instruments will continue to depend upon market participants’ preference for SOFR over any other alternative reference rate. In addition, while market activity in SOFR-indexed financial instruments has continued to develop, the progress has been uneven and there can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely accepted and used across market segments and financial products in a timely manner, and any other alternative reference rate may or may not be developed. Any disruption in the market transition towards SOFR or another alternate reference rate could result in increased financial, operational, legal, or reputational risks. The impact of LIBOR transition on our business, financial condition, and results of operations cannot be ascertained at this time.
Our exposure to credit risk could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We assume secured and unsecured credit risk associated with the risk that a borrower or counterparty could default, and we could suffer a loss if we were not able to fully recover amounts owed to us on a timely basis. In addition, we have exposure to credit risk because the market value of an obligation may decline as a result of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the obligor or the credit quality of a security instrument. We have a high concentration of credit risk exposure to financial institutions. Significant credit losses could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

15

Table of Contents

We depend on institutional counterparties to provide credit obligations that are critical to our business. Defaults by one or more of these institutional counterparties on their obligations to the Bank could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We face the risk that one or more of our institutional counterparties may fail to fulfill contractual obligations to us. The primary exposures to institutional counterparty risk are with unsecured investment counterparties, derivative counterparties, mortgage servicers that service the loans we hold as collateral for advances, and third-party providers of supplemental or primary mortgage insurance for mortgage loans purchased under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program. A default by a counterparty could result in losses to the Bank if our credit exposure to the counterparty was under-collateralized or our credit obligations to the counterparty were over-collateralized, and could also adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations efficiently and at cost-effective rates, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance” and “MPF” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

We rely on derivative transactions to reduce our market risk and funding costs, and changes in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of our derivative counterparties or changes in the legislation or the regulations affecting how derivatives are transacted may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions on acceptable terms.

Our financial strategies are highly dependent on our ability to enter into derivative transactions on acceptable terms to reduce our market risk and funding costs. We currently have a long-term credit rating of Aaa with a stable outlook from Moody's and AA+ with a stable outlook from S&P. All of our derivative counterparties or guarantors currently have investment grade long-term credit ratings from Moody's and S&P. Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports, or other factors may raise questions regarding the creditworthiness of a counterparty, which may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions with acceptable counterparties on satisfactory terms in the quantities necessary to manage our interest rate risk and funding costs effectively. Changes in legislation or regulations affecting how derivatives are transacted may also adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions with acceptable counterparties on satisfactory terms. Any of these changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Insufficient collateral protection could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We require that all outstanding advances be fully collateralized. In addition, for mortgage loans that we purchase under the MPF Program, we require that the participating financial institutions fully collateralize the outstanding credit enhancement obligations not covered through the purchase of supplemental mortgage insurance. We evaluate the types of collateral pledged by borrowers and participating financial institutions and assign borrowing capacities to the collateral based on the risks associated with each type of collateral. If we have insufficient collateral before or after an event of payment default by the borrower, or we are unable to liquidate the collateral for the value we assigned to it in the event of a payment default by a borrower, we could experience a credit loss on advances, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

17



WeUnder certain extreme stress conditions, we may not be able to meet our obligations as they come due or meet the credit and liquidity needs of our members in a timely and cost-effective manner.

We seek to be in a position to meet our members'members’ credit and liquidity needs and pay our obligations without maintaining excessive holdings of low-yielding liquid investments or having to incur unnecessarily high borrowing costs. In addition, we maintain a contingency liquidity plan designed to enable us to meet our obligations and the credit and liquidity needs of members in the event of operational disruptions or short-term disruptions in the capital markets. OurUnder certain extreme stress conditions, our efforts to manage our liquidity position, including our contingency liquidity plan, may not enable us to meet our obligations and the credit and liquidity needs of our members, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Business and Strategic Risks
Limitations on the payment of dividends and repurchase of excess capital stock may adversely affect the attractiveness of our business model to members.
Our business model is based on the premise that we maintain a balance between our objective to promote housing, homeownership, and community and economic development through our activities with members and our objective to provide a return on the private capital provided by our members. We achieve this balance by delivering low-cost credit to help our members meet the credit needs of their communities while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in our capital stock. Our financial strategies are designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our member base and our members’ credit needs change. In addition, we manage our retained earnings to ensure compliance with regulatory capital requirements in the event of significant growth in member business or in the event of significant Bank financial distress. As a result of these strategies, we have historically been able to achieve our mission by meeting member credit needs and maintaining
16

Table of Contents

our adequately capitalized position while paying dividends (including dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock) and repurchasing and redeeming excess capital stock. Limitations on the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock may diminish the value of membership from the perspective of a member.
Changes in the credit ratings on FHLBank System consolidated obligations may adversely affect the cost of consolidated obligations.
FHLBank System consolidated obligations are rated AA+/A-1+ with a stable outlook by S&P Global Ratings and Aaa/P-1 with a stable outlook by Moody’s Investors Service. Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports. Because all of the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, negative developments at any FHLBank may affect these credit ratings or result in the issuance of a negative report regardless of our own financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because of the FHLBanks’ GSE status, the credit ratings of the FHLBank System and the FHLBanks are generally constrained by the long-term sovereign credit rating of the United States, and any downgrade in that sovereign credit rating may result in a corresponding downgrade to the credit ratings of FHLBank System consolidated obligations. Any adverse rating change or negative report may adversely affect our cost of funds and the FHLBanks’ ability to issue consolidated obligations on acceptable terms, which could also adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations or limit our ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
We face competition for advances and access to funding, which could adversely affect our business.

Our primary business is making advances to our members. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured, including investment banks, commercial banks, the Federal Reserve Banks, and, in certain circumstances, other FHLBanks. Our members may have access to alternative funding sources, including independent access to deposits, along with the national and global credit markets. These alternative funding sources may offer more favorable terms than we do on our advances, including more flexible credit or collateral standards. In addition, many of our competitors are not subject to the same regulations as the FHLBanks, which may enable those competitors to offer products and terms that we are not able to offer.

The FHLBanks also compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs, as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities, for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs or lower amounts of debt issued at the same cost. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to access funding, reduce the amount of funding available to us, or increase the cost of funding available to us. Any of these results could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our efforts to makeLowering advances pricing attractive to our members may affect earnings.

A decision to lower advances prices to maintain or gain volume or increase the benefits to borrowing members could result in lower earnings, which could adversely affect the dividends on our capital stock.

If the Bank’sour activity stock requirement is below the Bank’sour regulatory capital requirements, a significant increase in business growth may require the Bank to increase its activity stock requirement in the future.

An activity stock requirement that is below the Bank’sour regulatory capital requirement requires the Bank to maintain a certain level of retained earnings for capital compliance and business growth. Depending on the level of the Bank’sour retained earnings and business growth and the Bank’sour capital management strategies, the Bankwe may be required to increase itsour activity stock requirement in the future.

17

Table of Contents

We have a high concentration of advances and capital with fivecertain institutions and their affiliates, and a loss or change of business activities with any of these institutions could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We have a high concentration of advances and capital with fivecertain institutions and their affiliates. All of the institutions may prepay or repay advances as they come due. If no other advances or investments are made to replace the prepaid and repaid advances of these institutions, it would result in a significant reduction of our total assets. During 2021, mergers and acquisitions have been announced involving certain of the Bank’s members, including some of the Bank’s largest borrowers. If other advances are not made to replace the advances of these members, the Bank’s total advances may be significantly reduced. The reduction in advances could result in a reduction of capital as the Bank repurchases the resulting excess capital stock, at the Bank’sour discretion, or redeems the excess capital stock after the expiration of the relevant five-year redemption period. TheSuch a reduction in assets and capital could reduce the Bank’sour net income.


18



The timing and magnitude of the impact of a reduction in the amount of advances to these institutions would depend on a number of factors, including:
the amount and period of time over which the advances are prepaid or repaid,
the amount and timing of any corresponding decreases in capital stock,
the profitability of the advances,
the amount and profitability of our investments,
the extent to which consolidated obligations mature as the advances are prepaid or repaid, and
our ability to extinguish consolidated obligations or transfer them to other FHLBanks and the associated costs of extinguishing or transferring the consolidated obligations.

Additional information regarding concentration risk is set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 85 – Advances – Credit and Concentration Risk.”

AThe lack of long-term growth or a material and prolonged decline in advances could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

If members continueThe Bank’s ability to experience high levels of liquidity, we could experience decreasessustainably fulfill its mission and achieve business objectives, including our ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock, is influenced by the long-term growth in members’ use of Bankmembership and advances. Also, nonmembers (including former members and member successors) are not eligible to borrow new advances from the Bank or renew existing advances as they mature. Although the Bank’sour business model is designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our members’ credit needs change, a lack of long-term growth in membership and advances or a prolonged material decline in advances could affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

A prolonged decline and lack of mortgage-backed securities purchases could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
Volatile market conditions increaseThe primary source of the riskBank’s earnings is interest income, which includes the net accretion of related income from improvement in expected cash flows on certain PLRMBS that our financial models will produce unreliable results.

We use market-based information as inputswere other-than-temporarily-impaired prior to our financial models, which we useJanuary 1, 2020. At the time these securities mature, the Bank may not be able to inform our operational decisions andreplace these securities with other mortgage-backed securities with the same or better yields, or be limited in the purchase of other mortgage-backed securities due to, derive estimates for use in our financial reporting processes. While model inputs basedamong other things, regulatory guidance on economic conditions and expectations are regularly evaluated and adjusted to changing conditions, sudden significant changes in these conditions may increase the risk that our models could produce unreliable results or estimates that vary widely or prove to be inaccurate.

Bank’s core mission assets.
We may become liable for all or a portion of the consolidated obligations for which other FHLBanks are the primary obligors.

As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), and regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) to require any FHLBank to repay all or any portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor, whether or not the other FHLBank has defaulted in the payment of those obligations and even though the FHLBank making the repayment received none of the proceeds from the issuance of the obligations. The likelihood of triggering the Bank'sour joint and several liability obligation depends on many factors, including the financial condition and financial performance of the other FHLBanks. If we are required by the Finance Agency to repay the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor, our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock could be adversely affected.

18

Table of Contents

If the Bank or any other FHLBank has not paid the principal or interest due on all consolidated obligations, we may not be able to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase any shares of our capital stock.

If the principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, we may not be able to pay dividends on our capital stock or redeem or repurchase any shares of our capital stock. If another FHLBank defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest on any consolidated obligations, the

19



regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks provide that the Finance Agency may allocate outstanding principal and interest payments among one or more of the remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis or any other basis the Finance Agency may determine. Our ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock could be affected not only by our own financial condition, but also by the financial condition of one or more of the other FHLBanks.

We are affected by federal laws and regulations, which could change or be applied in a manner detrimental to our operations.

The FHLBanks are GSEs, organized under the authority of and governed by the FHLBank Act, and, as such, are also governed by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 and other federal laws and regulations. From time to time, Congress has amended the FHLBank Act and adopted other legislation in ways that have significantly affected the FHLBanks and the manner in which the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission and business operations. New or modified legislation enacted by Congress or regulations or policies of the Finance Agency could have a negative effect on our ability to conduct business or on our cost of doing business. In addition, new or modified legislation or regulations governing our members may affect our ability to conduct business or our cost of doing business with our members. Because of the recent change in the leadership of the U.S. government administration, there are additional uncertainties in the legislative and regulatory environment as well.

Changes in statutory or regulatory requirements or policies or in their application could result in changes in, among other things, the FHLBanks' cost of funds, capital requirements, accounting policies, liquidity management, debt issuance, permissible business activities, and the size, scope, and nature of the FHLBanks' lending, investment, and mortgage purchase program activities. These changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock. In addition, given the Bank's relationship with other FHLBanks, we could be affected by events other than another FHLBank's default on a consolidated obligation. Events that affect other FHLBanks, such as member failures or capital deficiencies at another FHLBank, could lead the Finance Agency to require or request that an FHLBank provide capital or other assistance to another FHLBank, purchase assets from another FHLBank, or impose other forms of resolution affecting one or more of the other FHLBanks. If the Bank were called upon by the Finance Agency to take any of these steps, it could affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We could change our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members.

We maycould change our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members from time to time, including, without limitation, policies, programs, and agreements affecting the availability of and conditions for access to our advances and other credit products, the Affordable Housing Program (AHP), dividends, the repurchase of capital stock, and other programs, products, and services. These changes could cause our members to obtain financing from alternative sources, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. In addition, changes to our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members could adversely affect the value of membership from the perspective of a member.

The failure of the FHLBanks to set aside, in the aggregate, at least $100 million annually for the AHP could result in an increase in our AHP contribution, which could adversely affect our results of operations or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. Annually, the FHLBanks are required to set aside, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 million or 10% of their current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP) for their AHPs. If the FHLBanks do not make the minimum $100 million annual AHP contribution in a given year, we could be required to contribute more than 10% of our current year’s net earnings to the AHP. An increase in our

20



AHP contribution could adversely affect our results of operations or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our members are governed by federal and state laws and regulations, which could change in a manner detrimental to their ability or motivation to invest in the Bank or to use our products and services.

Most of our members are highly regulated financial institutions, and the regulatory environment affecting members could change in a manner that would negatively affect their ability or motivation to acquire or own our capital stock or use our products and services. Statutory or regulatory changes that make it less attractive to hold our capital stock or use our products and services could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Changes in the status, regulation, and perception of the housing GSEs or in policies and programs relating to the housing GSEs may adversely affect our business activities, future advances balances, the cost of debt issuance, or future dividend payments.

Changes in the status of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the next phases of their conservatorships may result in higher funding costs for the FHLBanks, which could negatively affect our business and financial condition. In addition, negative news articles, industry reports, and other announcements pertaining to GSEs, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and any of the FHLBanks, could create pressure on all GSE debt pricing, as investors may perceive their debt instruments as bearing increased risk.

As a result of these factors, the FHLBank System may have to pay higher rates on consolidated obligations to make them attractive to investors. If we maintain our current approach to pricing advances, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread (the difference between the interest rate received on advances and the interest rate paid on consolidated obligations) and cause our advances to be less profitable. If we increase the price of our advances to avoid a decrease in the net interest spread, the advances may be less attractive to our members, and our outstanding advances balances may decrease. In addition, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread on other interest-earning assets. As a result, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Operational Risks
We rely heavily on information systems and other technology. A failure, interruption, or security breach, including events caused by cyber attacks,cyberattacks, of our information systems or those of critical vendors and third parties, such as the Federal Reserve Banks, could disrupt the Bank’sour business or adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or reputation.

We rely heavily on our information systems, and other technology to conduct and manage our business, and we rely on vendors, and other third parties to perform certain critical services.conduct and manage our business. If we or one of our critical vendors experiencesexperience a failure, interruption, or security breach in any information systems or other technology, including events caused by cyber attacks,cyberattacks, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business effectively. In addition, such a failure, interruption, or security breach could result in significant losses, a loss of personal and confidential information, or reputational damage. Cyberattacks, in particular those on financial institutions and financial market infrastructures, have become more frequent, sophisticated, and difficult to detect or prevent. In the event of a breach resulting in loss of data, such as personally identifiable information or other such data protected by data privacy or other laws, we may be liable for damages, fines, and penalties for such losses under applicable regulatory frameworks despite not being able to limit our liability or damages in the event of such a loss. In addition, significant initiatives undertaken by the Bank to replace information systems or other technology infrastructures may subject the Bank to a temporary risk of failure or interruption while the Bank iswe are in the process of implementing these new systems or technology infrastructures. Although we have implemented a business continuity plan, we may not be able to prevent, timelyswiftly and adequately address, or
19

Table of Contents

otherwise mitigate the negative effects of any failure, interruption, or interruption.breach. Any failure, interruption, or interruptionbreach could adversely affect our member business, member relations, risk management, reputation, or profitability, which could then negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

The inability to attract and retain skilled key personnel could adversely affect the business and operations of the Bank.

21



the Bank.
Restrictions on the redemption, repurchase, or transfer of the Bank'sour capital stock could significantly reduce the liquidity of our shareholders’ capital stock investment.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, Finance Agency regulations, and our capital plan, our capital stock must be redeemed upon the expiration of the relevant five-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions. Capital stock may become subject to redemption following a five-year redemption period after a member provides a written redemption notice to the Bank; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity. Only capital stock that is not required to meet the membership capital stock requirement of a member or nonmember shareholder or to support a member or nonmember shareholder's outstanding activity with the Bank (excess capital stock) may be redeemed at the end of the redemption period. In addition, we may elect to repurchase some or all of the excess capital stock of a shareholder at any time at our sole discretion.

There is no guarantee, however, that we will be able to redeem capital stock held by a shareholder even at the end of the redemption period or to repurchase excess capital stock. If the redemption or repurchase of the capital stock would cause us to fail to meet our minimum regulatory capital requirements or cause the shareholder to fail to maintain its minimum investment requirement, then the redemption or repurchase is prohibited by Finance Agency regulations and our capital plan. In addition, since our capital stock may only be owned by our members (or, under certain circumstances, former members and certain successor institutions), and our capital plan requires our approval before a member or nonmember shareholder may transfer any of its capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder, we cannot provide assurance that a member or nonmember shareholder would be allowed to transfer any excess capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder at any time.

Regulatory Risks
Changes toin federal fiscal and replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest ratemonetary policy could adversely affect our business or results of operations.
Our business and results of operations are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The Federal Reserve Board’s policies directly and indirectly influence the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
20

Table of Contents

We rely on derivative transactions to reduce our market risk and funding costs, and changes in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of our derivative counterparties, or changes in the legislation or the regulations affecting derivatives, may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions on cost-effective terms.
Our financial strategies are highly dependent on our ability to enter into derivative transactions on acceptable terms to reduce our market risk and funding costs. Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports, which may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions on satisfactory terms in the quantities necessary to manage our interest rate risk and funding costs effectively. Changes in legislation or regulations affecting derivatives may also adversely affect our ability to enter into derivative transactions with acceptable counterparties on satisfactory terms. Any of these changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
We are affected by federal laws and regulations that could change or be applied in a manner detrimental to our operations.
The FHLBanks are GSEs, organized under the authority of and governed by the FHLBank Act, and, as such, are also governed by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 and other federal laws and regulations. From time to time, Congress has amended the FHLBank Act and amended or enacted other legislation in ways that have significantly affected the FHLBanks and the manner in which the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission and business operations. Recently, legislative proposals are being considered that may require the FHLBanks to increase the percentage of their annual earnings devoted to their affordable housing programs than is currently required by law. New or modified legislation enacted by Congress and regulations or policies implemented by the Finance Agency could have a negative effect on our ability to conduct business or on our cost of doing business. In addition, new or modified legislation or regulations governing our members may affect our ability to conduct business or our cost of doing business with our members.
Changes in statutory or regulatory requirements or policies, or in their application, could result in changes in, among other things, the FHLBanks’ cost of funds, capital requirements, accounting policies, liquidity management, debt issuance, derivative hedging activities, permissible business activities, additional contributions to the Bank’s AHP, and the size, scope, and nature of the FHLBanks’ lending, investment, and mortgage purchase program activities. These changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock. In addition, given the Bank’s relationship with other FHLBanks, events other than another FHLBank’s default on a consolidated obligation can affect us. Events that affect other FHLBanks, such as member failures or capital deficiencies at another FHLBank, could lead the Finance Agency to require or request that one FHLBank provide capital or other assistance to another FHLBank, purchase assets from another FHLBank, or impose other forms of resolution affecting one or more of the other FHLBanks. If we were called upon by the Finance Agency to take any of these steps, it could affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
Our members are governed by federal and state laws and regulations that could change in a manner detrimental to their ability or motivation to invest in the Bank or to use our products and services.
Most of our members are highly regulated financial institutions, and the regulatory environment in which our members operate could change in a manner that would negatively affect their ability or motivation to acquire or own our capital stock or use our products and services. Statutory or regulatory changes that make it less attractive to hold our capital stock or use our products and services could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
21

Table of Contents

Changes in the status, regulation, and perception of the housing GSEs or in policies and programs relating to the housing GSEs may adversely affect our business activities, future advances balances, the cost of debt issuance, or future dividend payments.
Changes in the status of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the next phases of their conservatorships may result in higher funding costs for the FHLBanks, which could negatively affect our business and financial condition. In addition, negative news articles, industry reports, and other announcements pertaining to GSEs, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and any of the FHLBanks, could create pressure on all GSE debt pricing, as investors may perceive that their debt instruments bear increased risk.
As a result of these factors, the FHLBank System may have to pay higher rates on consolidated obligations to make them attractive to investors. If we maintain our current approach to pricing advances, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread (the difference between the interest rate received on advances and the interest rate paid on consolidated obligations) and cause our advances to be less profitable. If we increase the price of our advances to avoid a decrease in the net interest spread, the advances may be less attractive to our members, and our outstanding advances balances may decrease. In addition, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread on other interest-earning assets. As a result, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
General Risk Factors
Economic weakness could adversely affect the business of many of our members and of our business and results of operations.
Our business and results of operations are sensitive to conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, as well as general business and economic conditions. Geopolitical instability, trade disruptions, or a sustained capital market correction could weaken consumer and business confidence and depress personal consumption and business investment. These factors could, in turn, adversely affect overall economic and housing market conditions. If economic and housing market conditions deteriorate, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Significant climate change events could adversely affect the members and business of our Bank, and failure to meet investor or other stakeholder expectations regarding climate change and other environmental matters may damage the reputation of the Bank.
The region where we operate is subject to natural disasters, including risks from floods, wild fires, drought, and other natural disasters. Climate change is increasing the frequency, intensity, and duration of these events, which could destroy or damage Bank facilities or member properties, including collateral that members have pledged to secure advances or mortgages, disrupt the business of the Bank or our members, increase the probability of power or other outages, negatively affect the livelihood of our members, or otherwise cause significant economic dislocation in disaster-affected regions. Any of these situations may adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations.operations of the Bank.

22

Table of Contents
In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the U.K., stated that they will plan for a phase out of regulatory oversight of LIBOR interest rate indices. The FCA has indicated they will support the LIBOR indices through 2021 to allow for an orderly transition to an alternative reference rate. Other financial services
There is increasing focus from investors, policymakers, regulators, and industry groups,other stakeholders on climate change. Enhanced governmental, regulatory, and societal attention to climate change, including the International Swapsexpanding mandatory and Derivatives Associationvoluntary reporting, diligence, and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, are evaluating the possible phase-out of LIBOR and the development of alternate interest rate indices or reference rates,disclosure on topics such as climate change, carbon emissions, water usage, waste management, and risk oversight, could expand the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. Manynature, scope, and complexity of matters that we are required to control, assess, and report. These issues and rapidly changing laws, regulations, policies, interpretations, and expectations may increase the cost of compliance and internal risk management programs for the Bank and alter the environment in which we do business, which could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank's assetsBank. In addition, the shift toward a lower-carbon economy, driven by policy regulations, low-carbon technology advancement, consumer sentiment, or liability risks, may negatively affect the Bank’s or our members’ business models, asset valuations, and liabilities are indexed to LIBOR. Given the large volume of LIBOR-based mortgages and financial instruments, the basis adjustment to the replacement floating rate will receive extraordinary scrutiny, but whether the net impact is positive or negative cannot yet be ascertained. The infrastructure necessary to manage hedging in the alternative reference rate still needs to be built out, and the transition in the markets, and adjustments in Bank systems, could be disruptive.operating costs.

ITEM 1B.ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) maintains its principal offices in leased premises totaling 109,00896,139 square feet of space at 600 California Street in San Francisco, California, and 580 California333 Bush Street in San Francisco, California. The Bank also leases other offices totaling 9,8586,808 square feet of space at 1155 15th Street NW in Washington, D.C., as well as off-site business continuity facilities located in Rancho Cordova, California. The Bank believes these facilities are adequate for the purposes for which they are currently used and are well maintained.


22



ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) may be subject to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business.

In 2010, the Bank filed two complaints in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco (San Francisco Superior Court), relating to the purchase of private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS). The Bank sought rescission and asserted claims for and violations of the California Corporate Securities Act and common law rescission of contract. In January 2017, the Bank entered into a settlement agreement with a defendant for an amount of $119 million (after netting certain legal fees and expenses). The Bank has settled or entered into settlement agreements with all the defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation.

After consultation with legal counsel, the Bank is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations or that are otherwise material to the Bank.


ITEM 4.
ITEM 4.        MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

23

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATIONII


ITEM 5.
ITEM 5.        MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) has a cooperative ownership structure. The members and certain nonmembers own all the capital stock of the Bank, the majority of the directors of the Bank are officers or directors of members, and the directors are elected by members (or selected by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to fill mid-term vacancies). There is no established marketplace for the Bank'sBank’s capital stock. The Bank’s capital stock is not publicly traded. The Bank issues only one class of capital stock, Class B stock, which, under the Bank’s capital plan, may be redeemed at par value, $100 per share, upon five years’ notice from the member to the Bank, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the satisfaction of any ongoing capital stock investment requirements applying to the member.

At the Bank’s discretion and at any time, the Bank may repurchase shares held by a member in excess of the member’s required capital stock holdings. The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) summarizes the Bank’s capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices with respect to restricted retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock. In January 2017, theThe Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to include the Bank’sincludes a dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate are at the discretion of the Bank’s Boardboard of Directors,directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration. The Bank’s historical dividend rates and the dividend philosophy are not indicative of future dividend declarations. The Bank’s dividend policy may be revised or eliminated in the future and there can be no assurance as to future dividends. For information on the Bank’s policies and practices with respect to dividend payments, see “Part I. Financial Information, Item 1. Business – Capital – Dividends and Retained Earnings,” which is herein incorporated by reference.

The information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements is set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital.” At February 28, 2018,2022, the Bank had 34,245,25521,050,637 shares of Class B stock held by 334330 members and 3,095,17529,868 shares of Class B stock held by 72 nonmembers. Class B stock held by nonmembers is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.


23



Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) rules state that FHLBanksFederal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings, and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. In addition, Finance Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan.

There is no requirement that the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Bank’s dividend rates declared (annualized) and amounts paid during the respective periods indicated are listed in the table below; the rates and amounts are not indicative of dividends to be paid in the future.

 2017 2016
 Amount of Cash Dividends   Amount of Cash Dividends  
(Dollars in millions)
Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

 Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

First quarter$54
 $11
 9.08% $45
 $10
 7.99%
Second quarter41
 7
 7.00
 49
 12
 8.90
Third quarter44
 7
 7.00
 52
 11
 9.17
Fourth quarter(2)
48
 7
 7.00
 138
 27
 22.51

(1)Reflects the annualized rate paid on all of the Bank's average capital stock outstanding regardless of its classification for reporting purposes as either capital stock or mandatorily redeemable capital stock (a liability), based on the par value of $100 per share.
(2)In the fourth quarter of 2016, the amount includes a special dividend at an annualized rate of 13.57%, totaling $100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Additional information regarding the Bank’s dividends is set forth in “Item 1. Business” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital.”




ITEM 6.[RESERVED]
24


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following selected financial data of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

(Dollars in millions)2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Selected Statement of Condition Data at Yearend         
Total Assets$123,385
 $91,941
 $85,698
 $75,807
 $85,774
Advances77,382
 49,845
 50,919
 38,986
 44,395
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio, Net2,076
 826
 655
 708
 905
Investments(1)
43,570
 40,986
 32,275
 31,949
 35,260
Consolidated Obligations:(2)
         
Bonds85,063
 50,224
 51,827
 47,045
 53,207
Discount Notes30,440
 33,506
 27,647
 21,811
 24,194
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock309
 457
 488
 719
 2,071
Capital Stock —Class B —Putable3,243
 2,370
 2,253
 3,278
 3,460
Unrestricted Retained Earnings2,670
 888
 610
 294
 317
Restricted Retained Earnings575
 2,168
 2,018
 2,065
 2,077
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (AOCI)318
 111
 15
 56
 (145)
Total Capital6,806
 5,537
 4,896
 5,693
 5,709
Selected Operating Results for the Year         
Net Interest Income$567
 $471
 $477
 $539
 $482
Provision for/(Reversal of) Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans
 
 1
 
 (1)
Other Income/(Loss)78
 485
 388
 (154) 5
Other Expense224
 158
 148
 144
 128
Assessments45
 86
 78
 36
 52
Net Income/(Loss)$376
 $712
 $638
 $205
 $308
Selected Other Data for the Year         
Net Interest Margin(3)
0.55% 0.52% 0.57% 0.64% 0.56%
Operating Expenses as a Percent of Average Assets0.14
 0.16
 0.16
 0.16
 0.13
Return on Average Assets0.36
 0.77
 0.76
 0.24
 0.35
Return on Average Equity6.21
 13.63
 11.68
 3.58
 5.36
Annualized Dividend Rate7.50
 12.33
 12.39
 7.02
 3.99
Dividend Payout Ratio(4)
49.59
 39.98
 57.81
 117.29
 52.29
Average Equity to Average Assets Ratio5.82
 5.68
 6.52
 6.75
 6.55
Selected Other Data at Yearend         
Regulatory Capital Ratio(5)
5.51
 6.40
 6.26
 8.38
 9.24
Duration Gap (in months)1
 1
 1
 
 1

(1)
Investments consist of interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.
(2)
As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended, or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all of the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The Bank has never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2017, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of all FHLBanks at the dates indicated was as follows:


25


Table of Contents

Yearend
Par Value
(In millions)

2017$1,034,260
2016989,311
2015905,202
2014847,175
2013766,837

(3)Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(4)This ratio is calculated as dividends per share divided by net income per share.
(5)This ratio is calculated as regulatory capital divided by total assets. Regulatory capital includes retained earnings, Class B capital stock, and mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability), but excludes AOCI.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including statements describing the objectives, projections, estimates, or predictions of the future of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) or the Federal Home Loan Bank System (FHLBank System), are “forward-looking statements.” These statements may use forward-looking terms, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “probable,” “plan,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “possible,” or their negatives or other variations on these terms, and include statements related to, among others, gains and losses on derivatives, plans to pay dividends and redeem or repurchase excess capital stock, future other-than-temporary impairmentcredit losses, future classification of securities, and reform legislation. The Bank cautions that by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk or uncertainty that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a particular objective, projection, estimate, or prediction is realized. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:
changes in economic and market conditions, including conditions in the mortgage, housing, and capital markets;
the volatility of market prices, rates, and indices;
the timing and volume of market activity;
natural disasters (including those resulting from significant climate change), widespread health emergencies (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), terrorist attacks, civil unrest, or other unanticipated or catastrophic events;
changes to, and replacement of, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark interest rate, and the use and acceptance of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) and any alternative reference rate;
political events, including legislative, regulatory, judicial, or other developments that affect the Bank, its members, counterparties, or investors in the consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks), such as the impact of any government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) legislative reforms, changes in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), changes in applicable sections of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, or changes in other statutes or regulations applicable to the FHLBanks;
changes in the Bank’s capital structure and composition;
the ability of the Bank to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
membership changes, including changes resulting from mergers or changes in the principal place of business of Bank members;
the soundness of other financial institutions, including Bank members, nonmember borrowers, other counterparties, and the other FHLBanks;
changes in Bank members’ demand for Bank advances;
changes in the value or liquidity of collateral underlying advances to Bank members or nonmember borrowers or collateral pledged by the Bank’s derivative counterparties;
changes in the fair value and economic value of, impairments of, and risks associated with the Bank’s investments in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) or other assets and the related credit enhancement protections;
changes in the Bank’s ability or intent to hold MBS and mortgage loans to maturity;
competitive forces, including the availability of other sources of funding for Bank members;
the willingness of the Bank’s members to do business with the Bank;
changes in investor demand for consolidated obligations (including the terms of consolidated obligations) and/or the terms of interest rate exchange or similar agreements;

26


Table of Contents

the impact of any changes and developments in FHLBank System-wide debt issuance and governance practices;
the ability of each of the other FHLBanks to repay the principal and interest on consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor and with respect to which the Bank has joint and several liability;
changes in key Bank personnel;
25

Table of Contents
technology changes and enhancements, and the Bank’s ability to develop and support technology and information systems sufficient to manage the risks of the Bank’s business effectively;effectively (including cyber-security risks); and
changes in the FHLBanks’ long-term credit ratings.

Readers of this report should not rely solely on the forward-looking statements and should consider all risks and uncertainties addressed throughout this report, as well as those discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.Factors.”

Overview

The Bank serves eligible financial institutions in Arizona, California and Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of the FHLBank System. The Bank’s primary business is providing competitively priced, collateralized loans, known as advances, to its member institutions and certain qualifying housing associates. The Bank's principal source of funds is debt issued in the capital markets. All 11 FHLBanks issue debt in the form of consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance as their agent, and all 11 FHLBanks are jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all consolidated obligations.

The Bank experienced strong earnings in 2017. Net income for the year2021 was $376$287 million, compared with net income of $712$335 million for 2016. The $3362020. Net income declined $48 million decrease inrelative to 2020 net income, primarily reflectedreflecting a $391reduction of $109 million decrease in gains on settlements relating toother income/(loss) that was partially offset by an improvement in credit losses of $32 million and an increase in net interest income of $17 million.
The $109 million reduction in other income/(loss) for 2021 was primarily a result of the Bank's private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) litigation. The decreasereceipt of disgorgement proceeds in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action, in the amount of $85 million, in the third quarter of 2020, and an increase in net income also reflected voluntary charitable contributionsfair value losses of $60$22 million made by the Bank during 2017 for the Quality Jobs Fund, a donor-advised fund established to support quality job growthassociated with derivatives and small business expansion, as well as voluntary contributions of $7 million to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) to offset the impact on the AHP assessment of the expense related to the charitable contributions.

financial instruments carried at fair value.
The $96$17 million increase in net interest income for 2017 relative to2021 primarily reflected lower funding costs, an improvement of $46 million in retrospective adjustment of the prior year reflected highereffective yields on mortgage loans and related delivery commitments, and an increase of $30 million in net gains on designated fair value hedges. These increases in net interest income were partially offset by a decline in average balancesinterest-earning assets. Additionally, the Bank recorded a reversal of interest-earning assets, combinedcredit losses of $6 million for 2021, primarily associated with higher spreads on those assets, and lower dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock, which arecertain private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) classified as interest expense.available-for-sale (AFS), which largely resulted from improved credit performance and a more optimistic economic outlook. This reversal of credit losses for 2021 compares with a provision for credit losses of $26 million for 2020 associated with certain PLRMBS classified as AFS, which primarily resulted from a significant decline in fair values in the first quarter of 2020.

Retained earnings grew to $3.2At December 31, 2021, total assets were $54.1 billion, a decrease of $14.5 billion from $68.6 billion at December 31, 2017, from $3.12020. Advances decreased by $14.0 billion, to $17.0 billion at December 31, 2016, and the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.50%, totaling $219 million, including $187 million in dividends on capital stock and $32 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock during 2017.

During 2017, total assets increased $31.5 billion, to $123.42021, from $31.0 billion at December 31, 2017,2020, as demand for advances remained muted in response to substantial market liquidity resulting from $91.9the ongoing economic and financial market impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including government intervention. In addition, mortgage loans held for portfolio decreased by $0.9 billion, to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2016, primarily reflecting an increase in period end advance balances, which increased to $77.42021, from $1.9 billion at December 31, 2017, from $49.82020, because the Bank ceased purchasing new mortgage loans for its own portfolio on March 31, 2021. These decreases to total assets were partially offset by an increase in total investments of $0.6 billion, to $35.8 billion at December 31, 2016. In addition, investments increased $2.6 billion, to $43.62021, from $35.2 billion at December 31, 2017, from $41.02020. The increase in investments primarily reflected an increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell of $8.3 billion at December 31, 2016, primarily reflectingand an increase in Federal funds sold.sold of $3.5 billion, which were partially offset by a reduction in U.S. Treasury securities of $8.5 billion as the Bank continued to manage its liquidity. A decrease of $2.8 billion in MBS also partially offset the other increases in investments balances.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) increased by $207$101 million during 2017, 2021, to $318$331 million at December 31, 2017,2021, from$111 $230 million at December 31, 2016,2020, primarily as a resultreflecting higher fair values of improvement in the fair value of PLRMBSMBS classified as available-for-sale.AFS.

On February 21, 2018,16, 2022, the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the average capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 20172021 at an annualized rate of 7.00%. The dividend6.00% that will total $59 million, including $6 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock that will be reflected as interest expense in$35 million. The quarterly dividend rate is consistent with the first quarterBank's dividend philosophy of 2018.endeavoring to pay a quarterly dividend at a rate between 5% and 7% annualized. The Bank recorded the dividend on February 21, 2018,16, 2022, and the Bank expects to pay the dividend on or about March 15, 2018.


27


Table of Contents

10, 2022.
As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank was in compliancecomplied with all of its regulatory capital requirements. The Bank’s total regulatory capital ratio was 5.5%10.9%, exceeding the 4.0% requirement. The Bank had $6.8$5.9 billion in permanent capital, exceeding its risk-based capital requirement of $2.0$1.1 billion.

26

The Bank plans to repurchase the surplus capital stock
Table of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 16, 2018. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum capital stock requirement.Contents

The Bank will continue to monitor theits financial condition, of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of totalfinancial performance, its capital to par value of capital stock, itsposition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets,market conditions, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock in future quarters.

Hurricanes HarveyAs previously disclosed, legislation has been introduced in both the U.S. Senate and Irma. During 2017, two significant hurricanes struck the southeastern coastHouse of Representatives that, if enacted in its proposed form, would require that the FHLBanks set aside a higher percentage of earnings for their affordable housing and community investment programs than is currently required under the existing law. Senate bill S. 1684, Federal Home Loan Banks’ Mission Implementation Act, and the related House bill, H.R. 3323, would require the FHLBanks to set aside 20% of net income for their affordable housing program and 10% of net income for a newly created economic development program. As part of the United States. On August 25, 2017, Hurricane Harvey made landfall near Corpus Christi, Texas, causingsubsequent Congressional budget reconciliation process, a legislative proposal is under consideration for the FHLBanks to set aside 15% of net income for their affordable housing program. The FHLBanks have had discussions with members of Congress and their staffs about the proposal to increase the AHP set aside percentage and continue to closely monitor any such proposals and developments.
COVID-19 Pandemic Impact. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the financial markets and created substantial damageuncertainty about future economic activity and floodingthe Bank’s operating environment. In response, the federal government and the Federal Reserve used their full range of tools to southeastern Texas, includingsupport the Houston metropolitan area. On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall oneconomy. The emergency measures taken by the Florida mainland near Marco Island, Florida. Hurricane Irma then moved northward through Floridafederal government and into Georgia, causingthe Federal Reserve helped facilitate liquidity and support stability in fixed income markets but contributed to the significant damagereduction in demand for advances from members. The Bank continued to property in Florida, Georgia, and certain other southeastern states.
meet its funding needs throughout 2021.
The Bank transitioned to remote work in mid-March 2020 and continued to operate effectively with employees working remotely throughout 2021. The Bank has analyzedassessed the potential impactremote work environment and has taken measures to mitigate cyber-security risks and operational challenges that damage related to Hurricanes Irma and Harvey might have oncould affect the Bank’s advances, lettersability to conduct business or increase the risk of credit, mortgage loans,operational incidents and PLRMBS securities. Based onerrors. Possible adverse impacts as a result of the information currently available,Bank’s workforce working remotely may include, but are not limited to, increased risk of operational incidents, cyber-security threats, and operational challenges that could affect the Bank’s ability to conduct business or increase the risk of operational errors.
To reduce the risk of the operational impact of the pandemic, the Bank does not expectmaintains a Board-approved Business Continuity Management Program, along with a Crisis Management Plan and Business Continuity Plans (BCPs), that are updated and tested annually. The Bank’s BCPs provide procedures to ensure personnel safety and welfare, to safeguard the potential losses resultingBank’s assets (including physical property and information), and to permit the continued operations of the Bank in the event of a short-term disruption or long-term catastrophic event. The Bank’s BCPs contain operating procedures for all critical processes and identify resources and staff necessary to continue operations based on business-defined recovery time objectives and communication requirements for internal and external stakeholders.
The full duration and impact of the pandemic and subsequent governmental and public actions remain uncertain. Demand for advances may continue to remain low or decrease because of the impact of government stimulus on member liquidity, Federal Reserve Board policies (including lower interest rates set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)), and reduced member asset activity. The Bank believes that lower demand from the hurricanesBank’s members for advances will have a material effectlikely continue into the foreseeable future.
Management will continue to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the Bank’s financial condition or resultsand operations, including the Bank’s liquidity, advance levels, funding spreads, and workforce effectiveness.
27

Table of operations. The Bank continues to evaluate the impact of the hurricanes on its mortgage loans held for portfolio and PLRMBS investments. If additional information becomes available indicating that any of these assets have been impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Bank will record appropriate reserves at that time. Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of 20172021 and 20162020

Net Interest Income. The primary source of the Bank’s earnings is net interest income, which is the interest earned on advances, mortgage loans, and investments. This includesinvestments, including net accretion of related income which is a result offrom improvement in expected cash flows on certain PLRMBS that were other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS,prior to January 1, 2020, less interest paid on consolidated obligations, deposits, mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and other borrowings. The Average Balance Sheets tablestable that follow presentfollows presents the average balances of interest-earning asset categories and the sources that funded those interest-earning assets (liabilities and capital) for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, together with the related interest income and expense. TheyIt also presentpresents the average rates on total interest-earning assets and the average costs of total funding sources.


28


Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheets
 20212020
(Dollars in millions)Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits$1,194 $0.14 %$3,077 $15 0.49 %
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,437 0.07 4,745 20 0.43 
Federal funds sold6,417 0.08 4,672 17 0.37 
Trading securities:
MBS— 2.19 — 3.13 
Other investments2,943 61 2.08 3,979 83 2.09 
AFS securities:(1)
MBS(2)(3)
9,861 216 2.19 10,686 213 1.99 
Other investments(3)
1,766 0.22 4,845 30 0.61 
HTM securities:(1)
MBS3,957 43 1.09 6,226 109 1.75 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio1,361 42 3.10 2,807 34 1.19 
Advances(4)
28,492 224 0.79 52,834 598 1.13 
Total interest-earning assets57,430 598 1.04 93,874 1,119 1.19 
Other assets(4)(5)
941 — 317 — 
Total Assets$58,371 $598 $94,191 $1,119 
Liabilities and Capital
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Consolidated obligations:
Bonds(3)
$29,085 $62 0.21 %$64,144 $437 0.68 %
Discount notes21,262 13 0.06 22,137 169 0.76 
Deposits and other borrowings1,089 0.08 828 0.29 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock— 5.38 62 8.90 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks— — 0.07 — 8.41 
Total interest-bearing liabilities51,440 76 0.15 87,172 614 0.70 
Other liabilities(4)
508 — 718 — 
Total Liabilities51,948 76 87,890 614 
Total Capital6,422 — 6,301 — 
Total Liabilities and Capital$58,370 $76 $94,191 $614 
Net Interest Income$522 $505 
Net Interest Spread(6)
0.89 %0.49 %
Net Interest Margin(7)
0.91 %0.54 %
Interest-earning Assets/Interest-bearing Liabilities111.64 %107.69 %
(1)The average balances of AFS securities and HTM securities are reflected at amortized cost. As a result, the average rates do not reflect changes in fair value or non-credit-related losses.
Average Balance Sheets
            
 2017 2016
(Dollars in millions)
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

Assets           
Interest-earning assets:           
Interest-bearing deposits$727
 $8
 1.05% $603
 $2
 0.38%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,008
 9
 0.93
 3,120
 12
 0.37
Federal funds sold10,871
 115
 1.06
 7,010
 29
 0.41
Trading securities:           
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS)7
 
 2.24
 9
 
 1.91
Other investments1,338
 17
 1.23
 1,537
 10
 0.61
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities:(1)
           
MBS(2)
3,890
 239
 6.14
 4,839
 262
 5.42
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities:(1)
           
MBS12,679
 274
 2.16
 10,756
 247
 2.30
Other investments915
 11
 1.22
 466
 4
 0.90
Mortgage loans held for portfolio1,402
 52
 3.74
 662
 30
 4.50
Advances(3)
70,169
 875
 1.25
 62,168
 482
 0.78
Loans to other FHLBanks7
 
 1.11
 3
 
 0.40
Total interest-earning assets103,013
 1,600
 1.55
 91,173
 1,078
 1.18
Other assets(4)(5)
964
 
   768
 
  
Total Assets$103,977
 $1,600
   $91,941
 $1,078
  
Liabilities and Capital           
Interest-bearing liabilities:           
Consolidated obligations:           
Bonds(3)
$62,905
 $713
 1.13% $51,606
 $410
 0.79%
Discount notes33,657
 285
 0.85
 33,504
 136
 0.41
Deposits and other borrowings258
 3
 0.96
 342
 1
 0.19
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock387
 32
 8.30
 494
 60
 12.25
Borrowings from other FHLBanks8
 
 0.57
 13
 
 0.46
Total interest-bearing liabilities97,215
 1,033
 1.06
 85,959
 607
 0.71
Other liabilities(4)
709
 
   756
 
  
Total Liabilities97,924
 1,033
   86,715
 607
  
Total Capital6,053
 
   5,226
 
  
Total Liabilities and Capital$103,977
 $1,033
   $91,941
 $607
  
Net Interest Income  $567
     $471
  
Net Interest Spread(6)
    0.49%     0.47%
Net Interest Margin(7)
    0.55%     0.52%
Interest-earning Assets/Interest-bearing Liabilities105.96%     106.07%    
(2)Interest income on AFS securities includes accretion of yield adjustments on other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (resulting from improvement in expected cash flows) recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020, totaling $51 million and $59 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

(1)The average balances of AFS securities and HTM securities are reflected at amortized cost. As a result, the average rates do not reflect changes in fair value or non-credit-related OTTI losses.
(2)Interest income on AFS securities includes accretion of yield adjustments on other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (resulting from improvement in expected cash flows) totaling $69 million and $81 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(3)Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements, as follows:





29


Table of Contents

(3)Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements, as follows:
2021
(In millions)AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation BondsTotal
(Amortization)/accretion of hedging activities$(22)$(108)$— $(130)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedged items11 — 13 
Net interest settlements on derivatives(195)(76)65 (206)
Total net interest income/(expense)$(215)$(173)$65 $(323)
 2017 2016
(In millions)
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

Advances$1
 $(27) $(26) $(1) $(55) $(56)
Consolidated obligation bonds(1) 27
 26
 4
 180
 184
2020
(In millions)AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation BondsTotal
(Amortization)/accretion of hedging activities$(5)$(50)$— $(55)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedged items(3)(14)— (17)
Net interest settlements on derivatives(297)(174)23 (448)
Total net interest income/(expense)$(305)$(238)$23 $(520)

(4)Includes forward settling transactions and valuation adjustments for certain cash items.
(4)Includes forward settling transactions and valuation adjustments for certain cash items.
(5)Includes non-credit-related OTTI losses on AFS and HTM securities.
(6)Net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)Net interest margin is net interest income (annualized) divided by average interest-earning assets.

(5)Includes non-credit-related OTTI losses on HTM securities.
(6)Net interest spread is calculated as the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
Net interest income in 20172021 was $567$522 million, a 20%3% increase from $471$505 million in 2016.2020. The following table details the changes in interest income and interest expense for 20172021 compared to 2016.2020. Changes in both volume and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread, and net interest margin.

Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2021 Compared to 2020
 Increase/
(Decrease)
Attributable to Changes in(1)
(In millions)Average VolumeAverage Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits$(13)$(6)$(7)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(19)(9)(10)
Federal funds sold(12)(17)
Trading securities: Other investments(22)(22)— 
AFS securities:
MBS(2)
(17)20 
Other investments(2)
(26)(13)(13)
HTM securities: MBS(66)(32)(34)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio(24)32 
Advances(2)
(374)(225)(149)
Total interest-earning assets(521)(343)(178)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Consolidated obligations:
Bonds(2)
(375)(166)(209)
Discount notes(156)(7)(149)
Deposits and other borrowings(2)(3)
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock(5)(4)(1)
Total interest-bearing liabilities(538)(176)(362)
Net interest income$17 $(167)$184 
(1)Combined rate/volume variances, a third element of the calculation, are allocated to the rate and volume variances based on their relative sizes.
(2)Interest income/expense and average rates include the interest effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements.
30

Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2017 Compared to 2016
      
 
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
(In millions) Average Volume
 Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:     
Interest-bearing deposits$6
 $1
 $5
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(3) (12) 9
Federal funds sold86
 22
 64
Trading securities: Other investments7
 (1) 8
AFS securities:     
MBS(23) (55) 32
HTM securities:     
MBS27
 42
 (15)
Other investments7
 5
 2
Mortgage loans held for portfolio22
 28
 (6)
Advances(2) 
393
 69
 324
Total interest-earning assets522
 99
 423
Interest-bearing liabilities:     
Consolidated obligations:     
Bonds(2)
303
 103
 200
Discount notes149
 1
 148
Deposits and other borrowings2
 
 2
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock(28) (11) (17)
Total interest-bearing liabilities426
 93
 333
Net interest income$96
 $6
 $90
Table of Contents

(1)Combined rate/volume variances, a third element of the calculation, are allocated to the rate and volume variances based on their relative sizes.
(2)Interest income/expense and average rates include the interest effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements.

The net interest margin was 5591 basis points for 2017, 32021, 37 basis points higher than the net interest margin for 2016,2020, which was 5254 basis points. The net interest spread was 4989 basis points for 2017, 22021, 40 basis pointspoint higher than the net interest spread for 2016,2020, which was 4749 basis points. These increases were primarily due to higher average balancesa result of interest-earning assets, combined with higher spreadslower funding costs, an improvement in retrospective adjustment of the effective yields on those assets.

mortgage loans and related delivery commitments, and an increase in net gains on designated fair value hedges.
For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020, the Bank updates its estimate of future estimated cash flows on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairmentcredit loss on the security, any improvement in expected cash flowsthe yield of the security is adjusted on a prospective basis and accreted into interest income.income based on the expected cash flows. As a result of improvements in the estimated cash flows of

30



securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the net accretion of yield adjustmentsincome is likely to continue to be a positive source of net interest income in future periods. (See “Item 7. Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Fair Values – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for Investment Securities”Amortization of Premiums and Accretion of Discounts and Credit Losses Previously Recorded Prior to the Adoption of New Accounting Guidance Related to the Measurement of Credit Losses on MBS and Mortgage Loans” for further information.)

Member demand for wholesale funding from the Bank can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, including economic and market conditions, competition from other wholesale funding sources, member deposit inflows and outflows, the activity level of the primary and secondary mortgage markets, and strategic decisions made by individual member institutions. As a result, Bank asset levels and operating results may vary significantly from period to period.

Other Income/(Loss). The following table presents the components of “Other Income/(Loss)” for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.
Other Income/(Loss)
(In millions)20212020
Other Income/(Loss):
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)
$(57)$15 
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(54)85 
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives37 (152)
Gain on disgorgement settlement— 85 
Standby letters of credit fees16 20 
Other, net
Total Other Income/(Loss)$(50)$59 
Other Income/(Loss)
  
(In millions)2017
 2016
Other Income/(Loss):   
Total OTTI loss$(10) $(26)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI(6) 10
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(16) (16)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)

 4
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(31) (40)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities(14) 9
Gains on litigation settlements, net119
 510
Other20
 18
Total Other Income/(Loss)$78
 $485

(1)The net gain/(loss) on trading securities that were economically hedged totaled $1$(57) million and $1$15 million in 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss, Credit-Related – Each quarter, the Bank updates its OTTI analysis to reflect current housing market conditions, changes in anticipated housing market conditions, observed and anticipated borrower behavior, and updated information on the loans supporting the Bank’s PLRMBS.

Additional information about the OTTI loss is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option – The following table presents the net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.
Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option
(In millions)20212020
Advances$(62)$85 
Consolidated obligation bonds— 
Total$(54)$85 
Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option
    
(In millions)2017
 2016
Advances$(31) $(27)
Consolidated obligation bonds
 (13)
Total$(31) $(40)


31


Table of Contents

Under the fair value option, the Bank elected to carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. In general, transactions elected for the fair value option are in economic hedge relationships. Gains or losses on these transactions are generally offset by losses or gains on the derivatives that economically hedge these instruments.

The net gains/(losses) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option were primarily driven by the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the actual terms on the advances and consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

Additional information about advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1915 – Fair Value.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities Under the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities, the Bank is required to carry all of its derivative instruments on the StatementStatements of Condition at fair value. If derivatives meet the hedging criteria, including effectiveness measures, the carrying value of the underlying hedged instruments may also be adjusted to reflect changes in the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged so that some or all of the unrealized gain or loss recognized on the derivative is offset by a corresponding unrealized loss or gain on the underlying hedged instrument. The unrealized gain or loss on the “ineffective” portion of all hedges, which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item or the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction, is recognized in current period earnings. In addition, certainCertain derivatives are associated with assets or liabilities but do not qualify as fair value hedges under the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These economic hedges are recorded on the StatementStatements of Condition at fair value with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings without any offsetting unrealized lossgain or gainloss from the associated asset or liability.

The following table shows the accounting classification of economic hedges and the categories of hedged items that contributed to the gains and losses on derivatives and hedged items that were recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives” in 2021 and 2020.
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives
2021 Compared to 2020
(In millions)20212020
Hedged ItemGain/(Loss) on Economic
Hedges
Income/
(Expense) on Economic
Hedges
TotalGain/(Loss) on Economic
Hedges
Income/
(Expense) on Economic
Hedges
Total
Advances:
Elected for fair value option$90 $(38)$52 $(67)$(37)$(104)
Not elected for fair value option(8)(3)27 (28)(1)
Consolidated obligation bonds:
Elected for fair value option(5)(4)— 
Not elected for fair value option(11)(8)(1)
Consolidated obligation discount notes:
Not elected for fair value option(2)(1)21 20 
Non-MBS investments:
Not elected for fair value option39 (40)(1)(31)(50)(81)
Mortgage delivery commitment:
Not elected for fair value option— — — — 
Price alignment amount(1)
— — — — 
Total$108 $(71)$37 $(69)$(83)$(152)
(1)This amount relates to derivatives and hedging activities” in 2017 and 2016.for which variation margin on cleared derivatives is characterized as a daily settled contract.

Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2017 Compared to 2016
                
(In millions)2017 2016
 Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

  
Hedged Item
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Advances:               
Elected for fair value option$
 $33
 $(23) $10
 $
 $44
 $(43) $1
Not elected for fair value option(3) (6) 1
 (8) 1
 (9) 3
 (5)
Consolidated obligation bonds:               
Elected for fair value option
 
 3
 3
 
 (1) 13
 12
Not elected for fair value option2
 (14) 8
 (4) (3) (18) 23
 2
Consolidated obligation discount notes:               
Not elected for fair value option
 (5) (29) (34) 
 23
 (28) (5)
MBS:               
Not elected for fair value option
 (5) 
 (5) 
 
 
 
Non-MBS investments:               
Not elected for fair value option
 
 
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Mortgage delivery commitment:               
Not elected for fair value option
 24
 
 24
 
 5
 
 5
Total$(1) $27
 $(40) $(14) $(2) $43
 $(32) $9


32



During 2017,2021, net lossesgains on derivatives and hedging activities totaled $14$37 million compared to net gainslosses of $9$152 million in 2016.2020. These amounts included expense of $40$71 million and expense of $32$83 million resulting from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges in 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. Excluding the impact of income or expense from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges, the net gains or losses on fair value and economic hedges were primarily associated with the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors during the period.

32

The ongoing impact
Table of these valuation adjustments on the Bank cannot be predicted and the effects of these valuation adjustments may lead to significant volatility in future earnings, including earnings available for dividends.Contents

Additional information about derivatives and hedging activities is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1814 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

GainsGain on Litigation Settlements, Netdisgorgement settlementDuring 2017 and 2016,gains relating to settlements with certain defendants2020, the Bank received disgorgement proceeds in the amount of $85 million in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action. The Bank had no gains on disgorgement settlements during 2021.
Other Expense. Other expenses totaled $159 million in 2021 compared to $165 million in 2020. The $6 million decrease in other expense primarily resulted from $3 million in matching grant programs the Bank provided in 2020 to partner with members providing assistance to their communities in response to the challenges brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic and a $2 million improvement in the net periodic benefit cost associated with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) totaled $119 million and $510 million, respectively.defined benefit plans in 2021.

Other Expense. Other expenses were $224 million in 2017 compared to $158 million in 2016, primarily reflecting voluntary charitable contributions for the Quality Jobs Fund in 2017.

Quality Jobs Fund Expenseand Other In the first quarter of 2017, the Board of Directors approved an allocation of $100 million for the Quality Jobs Fund, a donor-advised fund established to support quality jobs growth and small business expansion to be funded by the Bank in incremental amounts over the next two year period. During 2017, the Bank made voluntary charitable contributions of $60 million for the Quality Jobs Fund, as well as voluntary contributions of $7 million to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) to offset the impact on the AHP assessment of the charitable contribution expense.

Affordable Housing Program. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. Each FHLBank’s AHP provides subsidies to members, whichwho use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

To fund the AHP, the FHLBanks must set aside, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 million or 10% of the current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP). To the extent that the aggregate 10% calculation is less than $100 million, the FHLBank Act requires that each FHLBank contribute such prorated sums as may be required to ensure that the aggregate contribution of the FHLBanks equals $100 million. The proration would be made on the basis of the income of the FHLBanks for the previous year. In the aggregate, the FHLBanks set aside $384$201 million and $392$315 million for their AHPs in 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively, and there was no AHP shortfall in anyeither of those years.

The Bank’s total AHP assessments equaled $45$32 million in 2017, compared to $862021 and $38 million in 2016. The decrease in the AHP assessments reflected lower earnings in 2017.2020.

Return on Average Equity.Return on average equity (ROE) was 6.21% in 2017,4.46% for 2021, compared to 13.63% in 2016.5.32% for 2020. The decrease primarily reflected lower net income for 2021, which decreased 14%, from $335 million in 2017,2020 to $287 million in 2021, and thean increase in average equity from $5.2$6.3 billion for 2016in 2020 to $6.1$6.4 billion for 2017.in 2021.

Dividends and Retained Earnings. In 2017,2021, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.50%5.74%, totaling $219$135 million, including $187$135 million in dividends on capital stock and $32 milliona de minimis amount in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. In 2016,2020, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 12.33%5.53%, totaling $344$164 million, including $284$159 million in dividends on capital stock and $60$5 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends paid in 2016 included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of

33



$100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

The Bank paid these dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

On February 21, 2018, the Bank’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 2017 at an annualized rate of 7.00% totaling $59 million, including $53 million in dividends on capital stock and $6 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The Bank recorded the quarterly dividend on February 21, 2018. The Bank expects to pay the quarterly dividend on March 15, 2018. Dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock will be recognized as interest expense in the first quarter of 2018.

The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period. Prior to July 2017, the Bank’s Framework had three categories of restricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount), and the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE Agreement). Under the Framework, the Bank’s required amount of restricted retained earnings was determined using the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, from July 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,000, and from January 2017 to July 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.

In July 2017, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved the transfer of all amounts classified as restricted retained earnings, other than the amounts related to the JCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change related to the transfer, the Bank’s Board of Directors amended the Framework to eliminate two of the categories of restricted retained earnings (Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the Bank’s retained earnings methodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance, and business growth. In January 2018, the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of total retained earnings of $2,500. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCE Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

Retained earnings related to the JCE Agreement totaled $575 million and $500 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additional restricted retained earnings totaled $1.7 billion at December 31, 2016. Total restricted retained earnings were $575 million and $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends in future quarters.

For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings”Earnings,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital,” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.”

ComparisonFor a comparison of 20162020 and 2015

Net Interest Income. The Average Balance Sheets tables that follow present the average balances2019 results of interest-earning asset categories and the sources that funded those interest-earning assets (liabilities and capital) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, together with the related interest income and expense. They also present the average rates on total interest-earning assets and the average costs of total funding sources.

34



Average Balance Sheets
            
 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

Assets           
Interest-earning assets:           
Interest-bearing deposits$603
 $2
 0.38% $719
 $
 0.01%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell3,120
 12
 0.37
 2,513
 3
 0.10
Federal funds sold7,010
 29
 0.41
 6,847
 9
 0.13
Trading securities:           
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS)9
 
 1.91
 10
 
 1.68
Other investments1,537
 10
 0.61
 2,439
 5
 0.21
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities:(1)
           
MBS(2)
4,839
 262
 5.42
 5,809
 264
 4.54
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities:(1)
           
MBS10,756
 247
 2.30
 11,783
 292
 2.48
Other investments466
 4
 0.90
 297
 1
 0.51
Mortgage loans held for portfolio662
 30
 4.50
 675
 33
 4.91
Advances(3)
62,168
 482
 0.78
 51,899
 299
 0.58
Loans to other FHLBanks3
 
 0.40
 5
 
 0.11
Total interest-earning assets91,173
 1,078
 1.18
 82,996
 906
 1.09
Other assets(4)(5)
768
 
   829
 
  
Total Assets$91,941
 $1,078
   $83,825
 $906
  
Liabilities and Capital           
Interest-bearing liabilities:           
Consolidated obligations:           
Bonds(3)
$51,606
 $410
 0.79% $47,481
 $317
 0.67%
Discount notes33,504
 136
 0.41
 28,853
 46
 0.16
Deposits and other borrowings342
 1
 0.19
 1,107
 1
 0.05
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock494
 60
 12.25
 421
 65
 15.49
Borrowings from other FHLBanks13
 
 0.46
 15
 
 0.11
Total interest-bearing liabilities85,959
 607
 0.71
 77,877
 429
 0.55
Other liabilities(4)
756
 
   485
 
  
Total Liabilities86,715
 607
   78,362
 429
  
Total Capital5,226
 
   5,463
 
  
Total Liabilities and Capital$91,941
 $607
   $83,825
 $429
  
Net Interest Income  $471
     $477
  
Net Interest Spread(6)
    0.47%     0.54%
Net Interest Margin(7)
    0.52%     0.57%
Interest-earning Assets/Interest-bearing Liabilities106.07%     106.57%    

(1)The average balances of AFS securities and HTM securities are reflected at amortized cost. As a result, the average rates do not reflect changes in fair value or non-credit-related OTTI losses.
(2)Interest income on AFS securities includes accretion of yield adjustments on other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (resulting from improvement in expected cash flows) totaling $81 million and $74 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(3)Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements, as follows:





35



 2016 2015
(In millions)
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

Advances$(1) $(55) $(56) $(2) $(106) $(108)
Consolidated obligation bonds4
 180
 184
 5
 257
 262

(4)Includes forward settling transactions and valuation adjustments for certain cash items.
(5)Includes non-credit-related OTTI losses on AFS and HTM securities.
(6)Net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)Net interest margin is net interest income (annualized) divided by average interest-earning assets.

Net interest income in 2016 was $471 million, a 1% decrease from $477 million in 2015. The following table details the changes in interest income and interest expense for 2016 compared to 2015. Changes in both volume and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread, and net interest margin.

Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2016 Compared to 2015
      
 
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
(In millions) Average Volume
 Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:     
Interest-bearing deposits$2
 $
 $2
Securities purchased under agreements to resell9
 1
 8
Federal funds sold20
 
 20
Trading securities: Other investments5
 (2) 7
AFS securities:     
MBS(2) (48) 46
HTM securities:     
MBS(45) (25) (20)
Other investments3
 1
 2
Mortgage loans held for portfolio(3) (1) (2)
Advances(2) 
183
 66
 117
Total interest-earning assets172
 (8) 180
Interest-bearing liabilities:     
Consolidated obligations:     
Bonds(2)
93
 29
 64
Discount notes90
 9
 81
Deposits and other borrowings


 (1) 1
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock(5) 10
 (15)
Total interest-bearing liabilities178
 47
 131
Net interest income$(6) $(55) $49

(1)Combined rate/volume variances, a third element of the calculation, are allocated to the rate and volume variances based on their relative sizes.
(2)Interest income/expense and average rates include the interest effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements.

Net interest income included $5 million of advance prepayment fees in 2016 compared to $8 million in 2015.

The net interest margin was 52 basis points for 2016, 5 basis points lower than the net interest margin for 2015, which was 57 basis points. The net interest spread was 47 basis points for 2016, 7 basis points lower than the net interest spread for 2015, which was 54 basis points. These decreases were primarily due to lower average balances of mortgage-related assets, partially offset by lower dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock, which are classified as interest expense.

36




Member demand for wholesale funding from the Bank can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, including economic and market conditions, competition from other wholesale funding sources, member deposit inflows and outflows, the activity level of the primary and secondary mortgage markets, and strategic decisions made by individual member institutions. As a result, Bank asset levels and operating results may vary significantly from period to period.

Other Income/(Loss). The following table presents the components of “Other Income/(Loss)” for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Other Income/(Loss)
    
(In millions)2016
 2015
Other Income/(Loss):   
Total OTTI loss$(26) $(31)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI10
 16
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(16) (15)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)

4
 (2)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(40) (50)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities9
 (16)
Gains on litigation settlements, net510
 459
Other18
 12
Total Other Income/(Loss)$485
 $388

(1) The net gain/(loss) on trading securities that were economically hedged totaled $1 million and a de minimis amount in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss, Credit-Related – Each quarter, the Bank updates its OTTI analysis to reflect current housing market conditions, changes in anticipated housing market conditions, observed and anticipated borrower behavior, and updated information on the loans supporting the Bank’s PLRMBS.

Additional information about the OTTI loss is provided in “Management’soperations, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option – The following table presents the net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option
    
(In millions)2016
 2015
Advances$(27) $(31)
Consolidated obligation bonds(13) (19)
Total$(40) $(50)

Under the fair value option, the Bank elected to carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. In general, transactions elected for the fair value option are in economic hedge relationships. Gains or losses on these transactions are generally offset by losses or gains on the derivatives that economically hedge these instruments.

The net gains/(losses) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option were primarily driven by the effectsResults of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and

37



other market factors relative to the actual terms on the advances and consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

Additional information about advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19 – Fair Value.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities – Under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, the Bank is required to carry all of its derivative instruments on the Statement of Condition at fair value. If derivatives meet the hedging criteria, including effectiveness measures, the carrying value of the underlying hedged instruments may also be adjusted to reflect changesOperations” in the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged so that some or all of the unrealized gain or loss recognized on the derivative is offset by a corresponding unrealized loss or gain on the underlying hedged instrument. The unrealized gain or loss on the “ineffective” portion of all hedges, which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item or the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction, is recognized in current period earnings. In addition, certain derivatives are associated with assets or liabilities but do not qualify as fair value hedges under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These economic hedges are recorded on the Statement of Condition at fair value with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings without any offsetting unrealized loss or gain from the associated asset or liability.Bank’s 2020 Form 10-K.

The following table shows the accounting classification of hedges and the categories of hedged items that contributed to the gains and losses on derivatives and hedged items that were recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in 2016 and 2015.
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2016 Compared to 2015
                
(In millions)2016 2015
 Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

  
Hedged Item
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Advances:               
Elected for fair value option$
 $44
 $(43) $1
 $
 $19
 $(73) $(54)
Not elected for fair value option1
 (9) 3
 (5) (1) 1
 1
 1
Consolidated obligation bonds:               
Elected for fair value option
 (1) 13
 12
 
 8
 49
 57
Not elected for fair value option(3) (18) 23
 2
 (9) (19) 35
 7
Consolidated obligation discount notes:               
Not elected for fair value option
 23
 (28) (5) 
 4
 (30) (26)
MBS:               
Not elected for fair value option
 
 
 
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Non-MBS investments:               
Not elected for fair value option
 (1) 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Mortgage delivery commitment:               
Not elected for fair value option
 5
 
 5
 
 2
 
 2
Total$(2) $43
 $(32) $9
 $(10) $12
 $(18) $(16)

During 2016, net gains on derivatives and hedging activities totaled $9 million compared to net losses of $16 million in 2015. These amounts included expense of $32 million and expense of $18 million resulting from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges in 2016 and 2015, respectively. Excluding the impact of income or expense from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges, the net gains or losses on fair value and economic hedges were primarily associated with the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors during the period.


38



The ongoing impact of these valuation adjustments on the Bank cannot be predicted and the effects of these valuation adjustments may lead to significant volatility in future earnings, including earnings available for dividends.

Additional information about derivatives and hedging activities is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Gains on Litigation Settlements, Net – During 2016 and 2015,gains relating to settlements with certain defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) totaled $510 million and $459 million, respectively.

Other Expense. Other expenses were $158 million in 2016 compared to $148 million in 2015, reflecting higher compensation and benefits and operating expenses in 2016.

Affordable Housing Program. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. Each FHLBank’s AHP provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

The Bank’s total AHP assessments equaled $86 million in 2016, compared to $78 million in 2015. The increase in the AHP assessments reflected higher earnings in 2016.

Return on Average Equity. Return on average equity (ROE) was 13.63% in 2016, compared to 11.68% in 2015. The increase primarily reflected higher net income in 2016, and the decrease in average equity from $5.5 billion for 2015 to $5.2 billion for 2016.

Dividends and Retained Earnings. In 2016, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 12.33%, totaling $344 million, including $284 million in dividends on capital stock and $60 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of $100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. In 2015, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 12.39%, totaling $434 million, including $369 million in dividends on capital stock and $65 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of $145 million, including $120 million in dividends on capital stock and $25 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

The Bank paid these dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

Retained earnings related to valuation adjustments totaled $18 million and $10 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Retained earnings related to the JCE Agreement totaled $500 million and $358 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Restricted retained earnings for loss protection and capital compliance were $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2016.

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends in future quarters.

For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.”

39



Financial Condition

Total assets were $123.4$54.1 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, compared to $91.9$68.6 billion at December 31, 2016.2020. Advances increaseddecreased by $27.6$14.0 billion, or 55%45%, to $77.4 billion at December 31, 2017, from $49.8 billion at December 31, 2016. MBS increased by $0.8 billion, or 5%, to $17.8 billion at December 31, 2017, from $17.0 billion at December 31, 2016.2021, from $31.0 billion at December 31,
33

2020. MBS investments decreased by $2.8 billion, or 18%, to $13.0 billion at December 31, 2021, from $15.8 billion at December 31, 2020. Average total assets were $104.0$58.4 billion for 2017,2021, a 13% increase compared to $91.938% decrease from $94.2 billion for 2016.2020. Average advances were $70.2$28.5 billion for 2017,2021, a 13% increase46% decrease from $62.2$52.8 billion for 2016.2020. Average MBS investments were $16.6$13.8 billion for 2017, a 6% increase2021, an 18% decrease from $15.6$16.9 billion for 2016.

2020.
Advances outstanding at December 31, 2017,2021, included net unrealized lossesgains of $104$169 million, of which $88$103 million represented unrealized lossesgains on advances hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and $16$66 million represented unrealized lossesgains on economically hedged advances that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. Advances outstanding at December 31, 2016,2020, included unrealized lossesgains of $12$639 million, of which $22$509 million represented unrealized lossesgains on advances hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and $10$130 million represented unrealized gains on economically hedged advances that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The overall increasechange in the net unrealized lossesgains on the hedged advances and advances carried at fair value from December 31, 2016,2020, to December 31, 2017,2021, was primarily attributable to the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the terms on the Bank’s advances during the period.

Total liabilities were $116.6$47.9 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase2021, a decrease of $30.2$14.5 billion from $86.4$62.4 billion at December 31, 2016,2020, primarily reflecting a $31.8$13.9 billion increasedecrease in consolidated obligations outstanding to $115.5$46.7 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $83.7$60.6 billion at December 31, 2016, partially offset by a $1.3 billion decrease in borrowings from other FHLBanks.2020. Average total liabilities were $97.9$51.9 billion for 2017,2021, a 13% increase41% decrease compared to $86.7$87.9 billion for 2016.2020. Average consolidated obligations were $96.6$50.3 billion for 20172021 and $85.1$86.3 billion for 2016.

2020.
Consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 2017,2021, included unrealized gains of $37$139 million on consolidated obligation bonds hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and unrealized gains of $6 million on economically hedged consolidated obligation bonds that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. Consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 2016,2020, included unrealized losses of $6$13 million on consolidated obligation bonds hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and unrealized gainslosses of $8$1 million on economically hedged consolidated obligation bonds that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The increasechange in the net unrealized gains on the hedged consolidated obligation bonds and on the consolidated obligation bonds carried at fair value from December 31, 2016,2020, to December 31, 2017,2021, were primarily attributable to the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the actual terms on the Bank'sBank’s consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The Bank has never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2017,2021, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $1,034.3$652.9 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, and $989.3$746.8 billion at December 31, 2016.

2020.
On August 29, 2017,5, 2021, S&P Global Ratings (S&P) affirmed the long-term issuer credit ratings on all of the FHLBanks at AA+. The outlook for all ratings remained stable.

On November 14, 2017,July 28, 2021, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) affirmed the Aaa long-term ratings of the FHLBank System. The outlook for all ratings remained stable.

40




Changes in the long-term credit ratings of individual FHLBanks do not necessarily affect the credit rating of the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the FHLBanks. Rating agencies may change or withdraw a rating from time to time because of various factors, including operating results or actions taken, business developments, or
34

changes in their opinion regarding, among other factors, the general outlook for a particular industry or the economy.

Certain Bank assets and derivatives are indexed to LIBOR. The Bank recognizes that the impending discontinuation of LIBOR presents risks and challenges that could have an impact on the Bank’s business. For information about the risks to the Bank from discontinuation of LIBOR, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Accordingly, the Bank has established the LIBOR Transition Working Group, led by the Chief Financial Officer, and developed a LIBOR Phase Out Transition Plan (Transition Plan). Among other things, the Transition Plan identifies key strategies to manage and mitigate the risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR: (i) execute hedging strategies that permit alternative reference rates, including SOFR, (ii) transact SOFR-indexed advances and bonds, (iii) where practicable, implement improved fallback provisions for the discontinuation of LIBOR in new and legacy contracts, and (iv) where practicable, terminate LIBOR derivatives with maturities after June 30, 2023, and replace them with SOFR derivatives. In addition, the Transition Plan prohibits new LIBOR transactions, consistent with the limits set by the Finance Agency’s Supervisory Letter issued on September 27, 2019. The Transition Plan states that the Bank’s Asset and Liability Management Committee has primary responsibility for driving the transition from LIBOR to SOFR and that the Bank’s Business Development Committee is responsible for advance product development to facilitate our members’ transition from LIBOR to an alternative index.
On October 21, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter to the FHLBanks that required each FHLBank to adhere to the Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol) by December 31, 2020, and, to the extent necessary, to amend any bilateral agreements regarding the adoption of the Protocol by December 15, 2020. On October 23, 2020, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) launched the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) and the ISDA 2020 Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Protocol. Both the Supplement and the Protocol took effect on January 25, 2021. As part of its LIBOR transition efforts, the Bank and all of its uncleared derivatives counterparties have adhered to the Protocol. On January 25, 2021, all of the Bank’s outstanding legacy bilateral derivative transactions that referenced a covered IBOR, including U.S. dollar LIBOR, were amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation.
On March 5, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) further announced that LIBOR will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings.
Although the FCA does not believe,expect LIBOR to become unrepresentative before the applicable cessation date and intends to consult on requiring the administrator of LIBOR to continue publishing LIBOR of certain currencies and tenors on a non-representative, synthetic basis for a period after the applicable cessation date, there is no assurance that LIBOR, of any particular currency or tenor, will continue to be published or be representative through any particular date. The FCA’s announcements constitutes an index cessation event under the Protocol and Supplement, and as a result, the fallbacks spread adjustment for each tenor was fixed as of the date of this report, that it is probable thatthe announcement.
At December 31, 2021, the Bank had no exposure to LIBOR settings that ceased immediately after December 31, 2021.
The following tables present LIBOR-indexed variable rate financial instruments for LIBOR tenors that cease or will no longer be requiredrepresentative immediately after June 30, 2023, by due date or termination date at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
35

LIBOR-Indexed Financial Instruments
(In millions)
December 31, 2021
Due/Terminates in 2022Due/Terminates through June 30, 2023Due/Terminates thereafterTotal
Assets indexed to LIBOR:
Par value of advances by redemption term$250 $— $10 $260 
Unpaid principal balance of investment securities by contractual maturity
MBS(1)
— 12 4,098 4,110 
Total securities
Notional amount of receive leg LIBOR interest rate swaps by termination date
Cleared517 309 562 1,388 
Uncleared112 23 10 145 
Total$879 $344 $4,680 $5,903 
Notional amount of pay leg LIBOR interest rate swaps by termination date
Cleared$210 $52 $40 $302 
Uncleared35 — — 35 
Total$245 $52 $40 $337 
December 31, 2020
Due/Terminates in 2021Due/Terminates in 2022Due/Terminates through June 30, 2023Due/Terminates thereafterTotal
Assets indexed to LIBOR:
Par value of advances by redemption term$100 $250 $— $10 $360 
Unpaid principal balance of investment securities by contractual maturity
MBS(1)
— 98 5,645 5,744 
Notional amount of receive leg LIBOR interest rate swaps by termination date
Cleared6,852 887 369 798 8,906 
Uncleared213 112 22 394 741 
Total$7,165 $1,250 $489 $6,847 $15,751 
Liabilities indexed to LIBOR:
Par value of consolidated obligation bonds by contractual maturity$6,798 $— $— $— $6,798 
Notional amount of pay leg LIBOR interest rate swaps by termination date
Cleared1,523 559 100 28 2,210 
Uncleared238 35 — 95 368 
Total$8,559 $594 $100 $123 $9,376 
(1)Certain MBS with multiple indices where LIBOR is the majority index are included in this amount.
36

As of December 31, 2021, interest rate caps and floors indexed to repay any principal orLIBOR totaling $550 million were due to terminate after June 30, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, interest associated with consolidated obligations for whichrate caps and floors indexed to LIBOR totaling $230 million were due to terminate in 2021 and totaling $550 million were due to terminate after June 30, 2023.
Market activity in SOFR-indexed financial instruments continues to increase. During 2021 and in total, the Bank is nothas issued $1.1 billion and $102.3 billion, respectively, in SOFR-indexed consolidated obligation bonds. The table below presents the primary obligor.par value of variable rate consolidated obligation bonds by interest rate index at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Variable Rate Consolidated Obligation Bonds by Interest Rate Index
(In millions)Amount Outstanding
Interest Rate Index20212020
LIBOR$— $6,798 
SOFR5,575 30,915 
Total par value$5,575 $37,713 
For more information on LIBOR-indexed advances, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition Segment Information Advances-Related Business.” For more information on LIBOR-indexed investments and derivatives, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Risk Management.”
Segment Information

The Bank uses an analysis of financial results based on the financial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to the operations of these two business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges that are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivativesderivatives” in other income/(loss), excludes interest income and expense associated with changes in fair value of the derivative hedging activities”instrument and the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk for designated fair value hedges that are recorded in othernet interest income, and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI losses on the Bank’s PLRMBS, other expenses, andAHP assessments isare not included in the segment reporting analysis but isare incorporated into the Bank’s overall assessment of financial performance. For a reconciliation of the Bank’s operating segment adjusted net interest income to the Bank’s total net interest income, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1713 – Segment Information.”

Advances-Related Business. The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging instruments, liquidity and other non-MBS investments associated with the Bank’s role as a liquidity provider, and capital. Assets associated with this segment increased $29.4decreased $10.8 billion to $103.4$40.1 billion (84%(74% of total assets) at December 31, 2017,2021, from $74.0$50.9 billion (81%(74% of total assets) at December 31, 2016.

2020.
Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on advances and non-MBS investments and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding these assets, including the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements, and from earnings on capital.attributed to the Bank’s capital stock and retained earnings.

Adjusted net interest income for this segment was $234$198 million in 2017, an increase2021, a decrease of $80$69 million, or 52%26%, compared to $154$267 million in 2016. The increase2020, which was primarily due to an improvement inlower balances and profit spreads of advances and higher balances on advances-related assets and higher earnings from an increase in spreads on non-MBS investments, partially offset by lower earnings from advance prepayment fees.

other credit products. Adjusted net interest income for this segment represented 42%, 31%,43% and 31%56% of total adjusted net interest income for 2017, 2016,2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

Members and nonmember borrowers prepaid $8.5 billion of advances in 2017 compared to $3.5 billion in 2016. Interest income was increased by net prepayment fees of $1 million in 2017 and $5 million in 2016.

Advances – The par value of advances outstanding increaseddecreased by $27.7$13.4 billion, or 56%44%, to $77.5$16.9 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $49.8$30.3 billion at December 31, 2016.2020. Average advances outstanding were $70.2$28.5 billion in 2017,for
37

2021, a 13% increase46% decrease from $62.2$52.8 billion in 2016.for 2020. Outstanding balances of advances may significantly increase and decrease from period to period because of a member’s liquidity and financial strategies.strategies; therefore, yearend balances may vary significantly from average balances for the year.

As of December 31, 2017, advancesAdvances outstanding to the Bank’s top five borrowers and their affiliates increaseddecreased by $16.0$10.6 billion and advances outstanding to the Bank’s other borrowers increased by $11.7 billion. Advances to the top five borrowers increased to $48.4$8.9 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $32.4$19.5 billion at December 31, 2016. (See

41



“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 8 – Advances – Credit and Concentration Risk” for further information.)

During the fourth quarter of 2017, Charles Schwab Bank increased itsBank’s total advances balance from $5.0 billion as of September 30, 2017 to $15.0 billion as of December 31, 2017. If the advances outstanding to Charles Schwab Bank (and the other top five borrowers) with contractual maturities of one year or less are repaid as they come due and no other advances are made to replace them, the Bank’s assets would decrease significantly in 2018. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, JPMorgan Chase had $11.4 billion in advances outstanding, of which a significant portion is expected to be redeemed during 2018. Because JPMorgan Chase is not a member of the Bank, it is not able to borrow new advances from the Bank or replace outstanding advances as they are repaid or prepaid.2021. (See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 85 – Advances – Redemption Terms”Concentration Risk” for further information.)

If First Republic Bank continues to prepay advances or does not renew advances that come due, and if no other advances are made to replace these advances, the Bank’s total advances may be significantly reduced in subsequent quarters. In addition, it was announced on September 21, 2021, that U.S. Bancorp entered into an agreement to acquire Union Bank. U.S. Bancorp is not a member of the Bank. If Union Bank is no longer a member of the Bank or any successor to Union Bank does not become a member of the Bank, and if no other advances are made to replace Union Bank’s outstanding advances, the Bank’s total advances may be significantly reduced due to the loss of a significant member. Other acquisitions have been announced or completed involving large regional financial institutions in the Bank’s district, which potentially reduce the opportunity to grow advances from these large regional financial institutions. Advances outstanding to the Bank’s other borrowers decreased by $2.8 billion. The $27.7$13.4 billion increasedecrease in advances outstanding primarily reflected a $20.5$12.6 billion increasedecrease in fixed rate advances and a $4.9$1.1 billion increasedecrease in adjustable rate advances, partially offset by a $2.3$0.3 billion increase in variable rate advances.

The Bank has a significant long-term funding arrangement with a borrower that had, in prior periods, significantly contributed to the level of outstanding advances and may significantly contribute to the level of outstanding advances in the future; however, there can be no assurance that any advances will be made under this arrangement.
The components of the advances portfolio at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, are presented in the following table.
Advances Portfolio by Product Type
20212020
(Dollars in millions)Par ValuePercentage of Total Par ValuePar ValuePercentage of Total Par Value
Adjustable – LIBOR$250 %$250 %
Adjustable – SOFR, callable at borrower’s option— — 1,100 
Subtotal adjustable rate advances250 1,350 
Fixed4,765 28 6,108 20 
Fixed – amortizing69 — 126 — 
Fixed – with PPS(1)
1,406 1,687 
Fixed – with FPS(1)
8,957 54 19,919 66 
Fixed – with caps and PPS(1)
10 — 110 — 
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option with FPS(1)
70 — — — 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option200 200 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option with PPS(1)
20 — 20 — 
Subtotal fixed rate advances15,497 92 28,170 92 
Daily variable rate1,111 818 
Total par value$16,858 100 %$30,338 100 %
(1)Partial prepayment symmetry (PPS) and full prepayment symmetry (FPS) are product features under which the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid. Any prepayment credit on an advance with PPS would be limited to the lesser of 10% of the par value of the advance or the gain recognized on the termination of the associated interest rate swap, which may also include a similar contractual gain limitation.
The types of advances by redemption term at December 31, 2021 and 2020, are presented in the following table.
38

Advances Portfolio by Product Type
        
 2017 2016
(Dollar in millions)Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
 Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
Adjustable – LIBOR$6,957
 9% $3,232
 6%
Adjustable – LIBOR, callable at borrower’s option16,495
 21
 15,396
 31
Adjustable – LIBOR, with caps and/or floors and PPS(1)
83
 
 30
 
Adjustable – Other Indices2
 
 2
 
Subtotal adjustable rate advances23,537
 30
 18,660
 37
Fixed38,242
 50
 20,448
 42
Fixed – amortizing210
 
 214
 
Fixed – with PPS(1)
4,035
 5
 3,060
 6
Fixed – with caps and PPS(1)
425
 1
 375
 1
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option1,802
 2
 2
 
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option with PPS(1)
75
 
 107
 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option
 
 50
 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option with PPS(1)

 
 75
 
Subtotal fixed rate advances44,789
 58
 24,331
 49
Daily variable rate9,160
 12
 6,866
 14
Total par value$77,486
 100% $49,857
 100%
Types of Advances by Redemption Term
20212020
(Dollars in millions)Par ValuePercentage of Total Par ValuePar ValuePercentage of Total Par Value
Fixed:
Within 1 year$2,741 17 %$11,002 36 %
After 1 year through 3 years5,770 34 9,326 31 
After 3 years through 5 years5,671 34 5,966 19 
After 5 years through 15 years946 1,500 
Thereafter10 — 30 — 
Subtotal fixed rate advances15,138 91 27,824 91 
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option:
After 1 year through 3 years50 — — — 
After 5 years through 15 years20 — — — 
Subtotal fixed – callable at borrower’s option advances70 — — — 
Fixed – putable:
After 5 years through 15 years220 220 
Subtotal fixed rate – putable advances220 220 
Fixed – amortizing:
Within 1 year27 — 42 — 
After 1 year through 3 years16 — 44 — 
After 3 years through 5 years10 — 16 — 
After 5 years through 15 years16 — 24 — 
Subtotal fixed – amortizing advances69 — 126 — 
Adjustable and variable:
Within 1 year1,361 818 
After 1 year through 3 years— — 250 
Subtotal adjustable and variable rate advances1,361 1,068 
Adjustable – callable at borrower’s option:
After 1 year through 3 years— — 1,100 
Subtotal adjustable – callable at borrower’s option advances— — 1,100 
Total par value$16,858 100 %$30,338 100 %

The following table presents the par value of LIBOR-indexed advances for LIBOR tenors that cease or will no longer be representative immediately after June 30, 2023, by redemption term at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(1)Partial prepayment symmetry (PPS) is a product feature under which the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid. Any prepayment credit on an advance with PPS would be limited to the lesser of 10% of the par value of the advance or the gain recognized on the termination of the associated interest rate swap, which may also include a similar contractual gain limitation.

LIBOR-Indexed Advances by Redemption Term
(In millions)Par Value
Redemption Term20212020
Due in 2021$— $100 
Due in 2022250 250 
Due after June 30, 2023(1)
10 10 
Total LIBOR-Indexed Advances(2)
$260 $360 
(1)For more information on the Bank’s Transition Plan, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition.”
(2)Total LIBOR-indexed advances include fixed rate advances with caps and PPS.
39

For a discussion of advances credit risk, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Advances.”

Non-MBS Investments The Bank’s non-MBS investment portfolio consists of financial instruments that are used primarily to facilitate the Bank’s role as a cost-effective provider of credit and liquidity to members and to support the operations of the Bank. The Bank’s total non-MBS investment portfolio was $25.7$22.7 billion and $23.9$19.4 billion as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The increase in the total size of the non-MBS investment portfolio

42



reflects higher balances of Federal funds sold, partially offset by lower balances of primarily reflected an increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell agencyand Federal funds sold, that was partially offset by a decrease in U.S. Treasury securities, and certificates of deposit.as the Bank continued to manage its liquidity.

Interest rate payment terms for non-MBS investments classified as HTMtrading and AFS at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, are detailed in the following table:
Non-MBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment Terms
(In millions)20212020
Fair value of fixed rate trading securities$250 $4,257 
Amortized cost of AFS securities503 4,980 
Non-MBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment Terms
    
(In millions)2017
 2016
Amortized cost of HTM securities other than MBS:   
Fixed rate$500

$1,350
Adjustable rate187

225
Total$687

$1,575

Borrowings – Total liabilities (primarily consolidated obligations) funding the advances-related business increaseddecreased to $96.6$33.8 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $68.5$44.7 billion at December 31, 2016.2020. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2016 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

To meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain embedded call options or other features that result in complex coupon payment terms. When these types of consolidated obligation bonds are issued on behalf of the Bank, typically the Bank simultaneouslytypically enters into interest rate exchange agreements with features that offset the complex features of the bonds and, in effect,to convert the bonds to adjustable rate instruments. For example, the Bank usesmay issue fixed rate callable bonds that are typically offset withand simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreementsagreement with call features thatto offset the call options embedded in the callable bonds. This combined financing structure enables the Bank to meet its funding needs at costs not generally attainable solely through the issuance of comparable term non-callable debt.

At December 31, 2017,2021, the notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the advances-related business totaled $95.5$48.0 billion,, of which $44.3$15.8 billion were hedging advances, $50.4$24.3 billion were hedging consolidated obligations, $0.8$0.8 billion were economically hedging trading securities,non-MBS investments, and $14 million$7.1 billion were offsetting derivatives. At December 31, 2016,2020, the notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the advances-related business totaled $59.4$67.4 billion,, of which $18.7$28.5 billion were hedging advances, $39.9$20.7 billion were hedging consolidated obligations, $0.7$7.1 billion were economically hedging trading securities,non-MBS investments, and $0.1$11.1 billion were offsetting derivatives. The hedges associated with advances and consolidated obligations were primarily used to convert the fixed rate cash flows of the advances and consolidated obligations to adjustable rate cash flows or to manage the interest rate sensitivity and net repricing gaps of assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements.

FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, along with similar debt securities issued by other GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are generally referred to as agency debt. The costs of debt issued by the FHLBanks and the other GSEs generally rise and fall with increases and decreases in general market interest rates.

On March 15, 2020, the FOMC lowered the Federal funds rate, to a target range of 0.00% to 0.25%, noting that the COVID-19 pandemic had harmed communities and disrupted economic activity in many countries, including the United States. In the weeks before and after the early March 2020 Federal funds target rate cut, interest rates declined significantly. Since the end of the first quarter of 2020, financial conditions have improved, in part because of the monetary and fiscal stimulus measures taken, and the Bank continues to be able to meet its funding needs. In its November 2021 meeting, the FOMC decided to maintain the target range of the Federal funds rate at 0.00% to
40

0.25% and continue its purchasing of Treasury securities and agency MBS. However, the FOMC stated that it will begin reducing the monthly pace of its asset purchases beginning in November 2021 and that, while similar reductions in the pace of purchases are likely each month, it is prepared to adjust the pace of purchases if warranted by changes in the economic outlook. The FOMC has also indicated its expectations for increasing the target range for the Effective Federal Funds Rate starting in 2022. The following table presents a comparison of selected market interest rates as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016. All selected market interest rates increased in 2017 compared to the prior yearend.2020.

Selected Market Interest Rates
Market Instrument20212020
Federal Reserve target range for overnight Federal funds0.00-0.25%0.00-0.25%
Secured Overnight Financing Rate0.05 0.07 
3-month Treasury bill0.04 0.06 
2-year Treasury note0.73 0.12 
5-year Treasury note1.26 0.36 

43



Selected Market Interest Rates
      
Market Instrument2017 2016
Federal Reserve target range for overnight Federal funds1.25-1.50
% 0.50-0.75
%
3-month Treasury bill1.36
  0.50
 
3-month LIBOR1.69
  1.00
 
2-year Treasury note1.89
  1.19
 
5-year Treasury note2.21
  1.93
 

The following table presents a comparison of the average issuance cost of FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes converted to LIBOR-indexed liabilities through interest rate swaps in 2017 and 2016. The average issuance cost relative to LIBOR of bonds improved while the average issuance cost of discount notes deteriorated in 2017 compared to 2016.

 
Spread to LIBOR of Average Cost of
Consolidated Obligations for the Twelve Months Ended
(In basis points)December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Consolidated obligation bonds–21.6 –14.8
Consolidated obligation discount notes (one month and greater)–26.1 –30.5

Mortgage-Related Business. The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the Mortgage Partnership Finance (MPF)Finance® (MPF®) Program, and the related financing and hedging instruments. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance,” “MPF,” and “MPF Xtra” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.) Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on the MBS investments and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets, including the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements.

At December 31, 2017, assets Assets associated with this segment were $20.0$14.1 billion (16% (26% of total assets), an increase of $2.1 billion from $17.9 billion at December 31, 2016 (19%2021, and $17.8 billion at December 31, 2020 (26% of total assets).

Adjusted net interest income for this segment was $325$258 million in 2017, a decrease2021, an increase of $13$50 million,, or 4%24%, from $338$208 million in 2016. The decrease2020. This increase was primarily a result of higher spreads from lower funding costs, an improvement in adjusted net interest income was due to lower spreadsretrospective adjustment of the effective yields on interest-earning assets, primarily causedmortgage loans and related delivery commitments, and a reversal of prior period expected credit losses, partially offset by lower spreads on new investments, andearnings from lower accretion-related income, which more than offset the impact of higher average balances of MBS investments and mortgage loans.

mortgage-related products. Adjusted net interest income for this segment represented 58%, 69%,57% and 69%44% of total adjusted net interest income for 2017, 2016,2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

MBS Investments – The Bank’s MBS portfolio was $17.8$13.0 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, compared with $17.0$15.8 billion at December 31, 2016.2020. During 2017,2021, the Bank’s MBS portfolio increased primarily because of $4.9decreased with $2.4 billion in new MBS investments,principal repayments and a $0.4 billion decrease in basis adjustments, partially offset by $4.1$0.1 billion in principal repayments.of fair value gains. Average MBS investments were $16.6$13.8 billion in 2017, an increase2021, a decrease of $1.0$3.1 billion from $15.6$16.9 billion in 2016.2020. For a discussion of the composition of the Bank’s MBS portfolio and the Bank’s OTTI analysis of that portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataCredit RiskNote 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.Investments.

Intermediate-term and long-term fixed rate MBS investments are subject to prepayment risk, and intermediate-term and long-term adjustable rate MBS investments are also subject to interest rate cap risk. The Bank has managed these risks predominately by purchasing intermediate-term fixed rate MBS (rather than long-term fixed rate MBS), funding the fixed rate MBS with a mix of non-callable and callable debt, and using interest rate exchange agreements with interest rate risk characteristics similar to callable debt. The Bank has purchased interest rate caps to hedge some of the interest rate cap risk associated with the long-term adjustable rate MBS investments.

44




Interest rate payment terms for MBS securitiesinvestments classified as trading, AFS, and held-to-maturity (HTM) at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, are shown in the following table:
41

MBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment TermsMBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment TermsMBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment Terms
   
(In millions)2017
 2016
(In millions)20212020
Amortized cost of MBS:   
Passthrough securities:   
Fair value of trading securities:Fair value of trading securities:
Adjustable rateAdjustable rate$$
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities$$
Amortized cost of AFS securities:Amortized cost of AFS securities:
Fixed rate$26
 $84
Fixed rate$8,423 $9,050 
Adjustable rate2,406
 1,414
Adjustable rate1,083 1,426 
Subtotal2,432
 1,498
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Total AFS securitiesTotal AFS securities$9,506 $10,476 
Amortized cost of HTM securities:Amortized cost of HTM securities:
Fixed rate4,738
 6,427
Fixed rate$403 $1,013 
Adjustable rate10,325
 8,989
Adjustable rate2,808 4,068 
Subtotal15,063
 15,416
Total$17,495
 $16,914
Total HTM securitiesTotal HTM securities$3,211 $5,081 

Certain MBS classified as fixed rate passthrough securities and fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations have an initial fixed interest rate that subsequently converts to an adjustable interest rate on a specified date as follows:
(In millions)2017
 2016
Passthrough securities:   
Converts in 1 year or less$
 $48
Converts after 1 year through 5 years24
 32
Total$24
 $80
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Converts in 1 year or less$
 $91
Total$
 $91

MPF Program – Under the MPF Program, the Bank may purchasepurchased from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product andproduct. Participating members originated or purchased mortgage loans, insured bycredit-enhanced them and sold them to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed byBank, and generally retained the Departmentservicing of Veterans Affairs (VA) under the MPF Government product.loans. In addition, the Bank may facilitatefacilitated the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBSXtra® product. When members sell mortgagesold loans under the MPF Xtra MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products,product, the loans arewere sold to a third-party investor and arewere not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition.

From May 2002 through October 2006, Unlike with conventional MPF products held for portfolio, participating members are not required to provide credit enhancement and do not receive credit enhancement fees under the MPF Xtra product. On December 17, 2020, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rateannounced that it would no longer offer new commitments to directly purchase, or to facilitate the purchase of, mortgage loans from its participating financial institutionsmembers. On March 31, 2021, the Bank closed all remaining open commitments to purchase mortgage loans for its own portfolio under the MPF Original product, and MPF Plus products. Participating members originated or purchasedby June 30, 2021, the Bank no longer facilitated the purchase of mortgage loans credit-enhanced them and sold them tounder the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans.MPF Xtra product.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, all mortgage loans purchased by the Bank under the MPF Program were qualifying conventional conforming fixed rate, first lien mortgage loans with fully amortizing loan terms of up to 30 years. A conventional loan is one that is not insured by the federal government or any of its agencies. Conforming loan size, which is established annually as required by Finance Agency regulations, may not exceed the loan limits set by the Finance Agency each year. All MPF loans are secured by owner-occupied, one- to four-unit residential properties or single-unit second homes.

45




The MPF Servicing Guide establishes the MPF Program requirements for loan servicing and servicer eligibility. At the time the Bank purchases loans under the MPF Program, the member selling the loans makes representations that all mortgage loans it delivers to the Bank have the characteristics of an investment quality mortgage. An investment quality mortgage is a loan that is made to a borrower from whom repayment of the debt can be expected, is adequately secured by real property, and was originated and is being serviced in accordance with the MPF Origination Guide and MPF Servicing Guide or an approved waiver.

The FHLBank of Chicago, which developed the MPF Program, establishes the minimum eligibility standards for members to participate in the program, the structure of the MPF products, and the standard eligibility criteria for the loans; establishes pricing and manages the delivery mechanism for the loans; publishes and maintains the MPF Origination Guide and the MPF Servicing Guide; and provides operational support for the program. In addition, the FHLBank of Chicago acts as master servicer and as master custodian for the MPF loans held by the Bank and is compensated for these services through fees paid by the Bank. The FHLBank of Chicago is obligated to provide operational support to the Bank for all loans purchased until those loans are fully repaid.

As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had approved 23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in 2013. The Bank purchased $1.4 billion in eligible loans under the MPF Original product during 2017.

Mortgage loan balances increaseddecreased to $2.1$1.0 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $0.8$1.9 billion at December 31, 2016, an increase2020, a decrease of $1.3$0.9 billion. Average mortgage loans were $1.4 billion in 2017, an increase2021, a decrease of $0.7$1.4 billion from $0.7$2.8 billion in 2016.2020.

At December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Bank held conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans purchased under one of two MPF products, MPF Plus or MPF Original, which are described in greater detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – MPF Program.” Mortgage loan balances at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, were as follows:

42

Table of Contents
Mortgage Loan Balances by MPF Product TypeMortgage Loan Balances by MPF Product TypeMortgage Loan Balances by MPF Product Type
   
(In millions)2017
 2016
(In millions)20212020
MPF Plus$267
 $354
MPF Plus$106 $139 
MPF Original1,738
 460
MPF Original848 1,767 
Subtotal2,005
 814
Subtotal954 1,906 
Unamortized premiums76
 18
Unamortized premiums28 35 
Unamortized discounts(5) (6)Unamortized discounts(1)(2)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio2,076
 826
Mortgage loans held for portfolio981 1,939 
Less: Allowance for credit losses
 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(1)(4)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$2,076
 $826
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$980 $1,935 

Mortgage loan balances by redemption term at December 31, 2021, were as follows:
Mortgage Loan Balances by Redemption Term
(In millions)2021
Within 1 year$30 
After 1 year through 5 years130 
After 5 years through 15 years354 
Thereafter440 
Total unpaid principal balance$954 
The following table presents the balances of loans wholly owned by the Bank and loans with allocated participation interests that were outstanding as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. Only the FHLBank of Chicago owned participation interests in any of the Bank’s MPF loans.


46


Table of Contents

Balances Outstanding on Mortgage LoansBalances Outstanding on Mortgage LoansBalances Outstanding on Mortgage Loans
   
(Dollars in millions)2017
 2016
(Dollars in millions)20212020
Outstanding amounts wholly owned by the Bank$1,916
 $688
Outstanding amounts wholly owned by the Bank$921 $1,862 
Outstanding amounts with participation interests by FHLBank:   Outstanding amounts with participation interests by FHLBank:
San Francisco89
 126
San Francisco34 44 
Chicago62
 84
Chicago25 32 
Total$2,067
 $898
Total$980 $1,938 
Number of loans outstanding:   Number of loans outstanding:
Number of outstanding loans wholly owned by the Bank5,797
 3,671
Number of outstanding loans wholly owned by the Bank3,011 5,097 
Number of outstanding loans participated2,203
 3,180
Number of outstanding loans participated719 866 
Total number of loans outstanding8,000
 6,851
Total number of loans outstanding3,730 5,963 
Under the Bank’s agreement with the FHLBank of Chicago, the credit risk is shared pro rata between the two FHLBanks according to: (i) their respective ownership of the loans in each master commitment for MPF Plus and (ii) their respective participation shares of the first loss account for the master commitment for MPF Original.

The Bank is responsible for credit oversight of the participating financial institution, which consists of monitoring the financial condition of the participating financial institution on a quarterly basisinstitution’s internal credit quality rating produced by the Bank’s credit model and holding collateral to secure the participating financial institution’s outstanding credit enhancement obligations. Monitoring of the participating financial institution’s financial condition includes an evaluation of its capital, assets, management, earnings, and liquidity.

The Bank performs periodic reviews of its mortgage loan portfolio to identify probable credit losses in the portfolio and to determine the likelihood of collection on the loans in the portfolio. For more information on the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of
43

Table of Contents
Significant Accounting Policies,” “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 6 – Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – MPF Program” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses – Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program.”

The Bank manages the interest rate risk and prepayment risk of the mortgage loans by funding these assets with callable and non-callable debt, by entering into certain interest rate swaps, and by limiting the size of the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio.

Borrowings – Total consolidated obligations funding the mortgage-related business increased $2.1decreased $3.7 billion to $20.0$14.1 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $17.9$17.8 billion at December 31, 2016, paralleling the increase in MBS investments.2020. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2016 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

The notional amount of interest rate exchange agreementsderivative instruments associated with the mortgage-related business totaled $4.1$15.6 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, of which $2.6$8.0 billion were associated with MBS and $7.6 billion were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolio. The notional amount of derivative instruments associated with the mortgage-related business totaled $11.2 billion at December 31, 2020, of which $8.3 billion were associated with MBS, $2.5 billion were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolio, and $1.5$0.4 billion were associated with MBS. The notional amountoffsetting derivatives.
For information on the Bank’s management of interest rate exchange agreements associated withrisk and market risk related to the mortgage-related business totaled $5.6 billion at December 31, 2016,segment, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of which $3.4 billion were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolioFinancial Condition and $2.2 billion were associated with MBS.Results of Operations – Risk Management – Market Risk.”






47


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Bank’s financial strategies are designed to enable the Bank to expand and contract its assets, liabilities, and capital as membership composition and member credit needs change. The Bank’s liquidity and capital resources are designed to support its financial strategies. The Bank’s primary source of liquidity is its access to the debt capital markets through consolidated obligation issuance, which is described in “Item 1. Business – Funding Sources.” The Bank’s status as a GSE is critical to maintaining its access to the capital markets. Although consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks and are not guaranteed by the U.S. government, the capital markets have traditionally treated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as comparable to federal agency debt, providing the FHLBanks with access to funding at relatively favorable rates. The maintenance of the Bank’s capital resources is governed by its capital plan.

Liquidity

The Bank strivesseeks to maintain the liquidity necessary to repay maturing consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor, meet other obligations and commitments, and meet expected and unexpected member credit demands. The Bank monitors its financial position in order to maintain ready access to sufficient liquidavailable funds to meet normal transaction requirements, take advantage of appropriate investment opportunities, and covermanage unforeseen liquidity demands.

The Bank’s ability to expand as member credit needs increase is based, in part, on the capital stock requirements for advances. A member is required to maintain sufficient capital stock to support its advances activity with the Bank. Unless a member already has sufficient excess capital stock, it must increase its capital stock investment in the Bank as its balance of outstanding advances increases. Under the Bank’s Capital Plan, the Bank may also require a member to purchase activity-based stock for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank. The activity-based capital stock requirement is currently 2.7% for outstanding advances and 0.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, while the Bank’s minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio requirement is currently 4.0%; therefore, the Bank maintains a certain required level of retained earnings to support capital compliance and business growth. For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.” Because the Bank’s capital plan does not provide for the issuance of Class A stock (non-permanent capital that is redeemable upon six months’ notice), regulatory capital for the Bank is composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes), and excludes AOCI.

The Bank is also able to contract its balance sheet as borrowers’ credit needs decrease. As changing borrower credit
needs result in reduced advances, borrowers will have capital stock in excess of the amount required by the Bank’s
capital plan. The Bank’s capital plan allows the Bank to repurchase a borrower’s excess capital stock, at the Bank’s
discretion. The Framework sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplusincluding mandatorily redeemable capital stock, of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion, and subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the Bank’s Risk Management Policy, Capital Plan, and capital plan limitations.the Framework. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement.

The Bank may also allow its consolidated obligations to mature without replacement or repurchase and retire outstanding consolidated obligations, allowing its balance sheet to contract.

The Bank maintained its strong regulatory capital position while repurchasing $414 million and $812 million in excess capital stock during 2017 and 2016, respectively, and redeeming $75 million and $28 million in mandatorily redeemable capital stock in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total excess capital stock was $493 million as of December 31, 2017, compared to $488 million as of December 31, 2016.


48


Table of Contents

The Bank is not able to predict future trends in member credit needs since they are driven by complex interactions among a number of factors, including members’ mortgage loan growth, other asset portfolio growth, deposit growth, and the attractiveness of advances compared to other wholesale borrowing alternatives. The Bank regularly monitors current trends and anticipates future debt issuance needs with the objective of being prepared to fund its members’ credit needs and appropriate investment opportunities.

44

Table of Contents
Short-term liquidity management practices are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Liquidity Risk.” The Bank manages its liquidity needs to enable it to meet all of its contractual obligations on a timely basis, to support its members’ daily liquidity needs, and to pay operating expenditures as they come due. At December 31, 2021, the Bank’s contractual obligations on operating leases were $44 million due through 2026 and $43 million due thereafter.
The Bank maintains contingency liquidity plans to meet its obligations and the liquidity needs of members in the event of short-term operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance or short-term disruptions of the capital markets. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s guarantees and other commitments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations.” For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2016 – Commitments and Contingencies.” Additional information with respect to the Bank’s consolidated obligations is presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 8 – Consolidated Obligations” and “Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

Capital

The Bank may repurchase some or allIn addition, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 11 – Capital” includes a discussion of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, including any excessthe Bank’s mandatorily redeemable capital stock, atand “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 12 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans” includes a discussion of the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutoryretirement plans and regulatory requirements. related expenses and commitments.
The Bank enters into derivative financial instruments, which create contractual obligations, as part of the Bank’s market risk management. “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 14 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities” includes additional information regarding derivative financial instruments.
Capital
The Bank’s ability to expand as member credit needs increase is based, in part, on the capital stock requirements for advances. A member is required to maintain sufficient capital stock to support its advances activity with the Bank. Unless a member already has sufficient excess capital stock, it must giveincrease its capital stock investment in the shareholder 15 days’ written notice; however,Bank as its balance of outstanding advances increases. Under the shareholder may waive this notice period. TheBank’s capital plan, the Bank may also require a member to purchase activity-based stock for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank. The activity-based capital stock requirement is currently 2.7% for outstanding advances, 0.1% of notional balances for outstanding letters of credit, and 0.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank. The Bank’s minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio requirement is currently 4.0%; therefore, the Bank maintains a certain required level of retained earnings to support capital compliance and business growth. For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 11 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.” Because the Bank’s capital plan does not provide for the issuance of Class A stock (non-permanent capital that is redeemable upon six months’ notice), regulatory capital for the Bank is composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes), and excludes AOCI.
Retained Earnings – The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period, and maintains an amount of total retained earnings at least equal to its required retained earnings as described in the Framework. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, the required level of total retained earnings had ranged from $1.5 billion to $2.9 billion during 2020 and 2021. The methodology may be revised from time to time, and the required level of required retained earnings under the methodology may change due to updating data and assumptions used in the methodology. In January 2022, the required level of retained earnings was increased from $1.5 billion to $1.7 billion. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE) Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings. The Bank’s retained earnings requirement may be changed at any time. The board of directors periodically reviews the retained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate.
45

Table of Contents
The JCE Agreement is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to allocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of the account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least 1% of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the calendar quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends. With the decline in consolidated obligations outstanding in 2020, the Bank ceased contributions to restricted retained earnings in the fourth quarter of 2020, in accordance with the JCE Agreement; and no further allocations of net income into restricted retained earnings are required until such time as the allocation requirement exceeds the balance of restricted retained earnings. Additionally, the JCE Agreement provides that amounts in restricted retained earnings in excess of 150% of the Bank’s restricted retained earnings minimum (i.e., 1% of the Bank’s total consolidated obligations calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter) may be released from restricted retained earnings. As a result of the Bank exceeding this threshold, the Bank reclassified $53 million from restricted retained earnings to unrestricted retained earnings during 2021. Total restricted retained earnings were $708 million and $761 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Excess Capital Stock – The Bank’s practice is to repurchase the surplus capital stock of all of a member'smembers and the excess capital stock atof all former members on a member’s request, atdaily schedule. The Bank calculates the Bank’s discretion, subjectamount of stock to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. Excessbe repurchased each business day based on the shareholder’s capital stock is defined as any capitaloutstanding after all stock holdings in excess of a shareholder'stransactions are completed for the day, ensuring that each member and former member would continue to meet its minimum capital stock requirement as established byafter the Bank’s capital plan.

repurchase. The Bank may change this practice at any time.
A member may schedule redemption of its excess capital stock following a five-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions, by providing a written redemption notice to the Bank. Capital stock may also become subject to redemption following a five-year redemption period after a member gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination, or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member’s Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity. Capital stock required to meet a withdrawing member’s membership capital stock requirement may only be redeemed at the end of the five-year redemption period, subject to statutory and regulatory limits and other conditions.

On a quarterly basis, the Bank determines whether it will repurchase excess capital stock. The Bank maintained its strong regulatory capital positionremained adequately capitalized while repurchasing $414 million$1.6 billion and $812 million$1.6 billion in excess capital stock during 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

The Bank's Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion and subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the Bank’s Risk Management Policy and capital plan limitations. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement, and excess capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of a shareholder’s minimum stock requirement. In addition, at the Bank’s discretion, all of the excess stock held by a member may be repurchased upon request of the member, subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. In accordance with the Framework, each quarter Bank management evaluates and determines the amount of capital stock to be repurchased in that quarter, if any, giving consideration to certain capital metrics and capital management objectives and strategies, and subject to the requirements and limitations listed above. At least 15 calendar days before any repurchase, the Bank will notify shareholders of its intention to repurchase capital stock and of the scheduled repurchase date. On the scheduled

49


Table of Contents

repurchase date, the Bank will calculate the amount of stock to be repurchased to ensure that each member and former nonmember shareholder will continue to meet its minimum stock requirement after the repurchase.

In accordance with its practice, the Bank plans to repurchase the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 16, 2018.

The Bank is required to redeem any mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is in excess of a former member’s minimum stock requirement on or after the expiration of the five-year redemption date. During 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Bank redeemed $75$1 million and $28 million, respectively,a de minimis amount in mandatorily redeemable capital stock, for which the five-year redemption period had expired, at its $100 par value. The stock was redeemed on the scheduled redemption dates or, for stock that was not excess stock on its scheduled redemption date because of outstanding activity with the Bank, on the first available repurchase date after the stock was no longer required to support outstanding activity with the Bank.

Total excess capital stock was $120 million as of December 31, 2021, compared to $161 million as of December 31, 2020.
The Bank will continue to monitor theits financial condition, of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of totalfinancial performance, its capital to par value of capital stock, itsposition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets,market conditions, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the repurchase of excess capital stock in future quarters.

Excess capital stock totaled $493 million as of December 31, 2017, which included surplus capital stock of $317 million. Excess capital stock totaled $488 million as of December 31, 2016, which included surplus capital stock of $325 million.

Provisions of the Bank’s capital plan are more fully discussed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital.”


46

Table of Contents
Regulatory Capital Requirements

Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act), the Director of the Finance Agency is responsible for setting the risk-based capital standards for the FHLBanks. The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations specifygoverning the operations of the FHLBanks require that each FHLBankthe Bank’s minimum capital stock requirement for shareholders must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet certain minimumits regulatory requirements for total capital, standards.leverage capital, and risk-based capital. The Bank must maintain: (i) total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least 4% of its total assets, (ii) leverage capital in an amount equal to at least 5% of its total assets, and (iii) permanent capital in an amount that is greater than or equal to its risk-based capital requirement.
The Finance Agency requires each FHLBank to maintain a ratio of at least 2% of capital stock to total assets in order to help preserve the cooperative structure incentives that encourage members to remain fully engaged in the oversight of their investment in the FHLBank. The Finance Agency will consider the proportion of capital stock to assets, measured on a daily average basis at monthend, when assessing each FHLBank’s capital management practices. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank complied with this capital guidance.
Because the Bank issues only Class B stock, regulatory capital and permanent capital for the Bank are both composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes). Regulatory capital and permanent capital do not include AOCI. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, weighted by a 1.5 multiplier, plus non-permanent capital.
The risk-based capital requirement is equal to the sum of the Bank’s credit risk, market risk, and operationsoperational risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency. The Finance Agency may require an FHLBank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined.

The following table shows the Bank’s compliance with the Finance Agency’s capital requirements at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. The Bank’s risk-based capital requirement decreased to $2.0$1.1 billion at December 31, 2017,2021, from $2.2$1.4 billion at December 31, 2016.  
2020.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
        
 2017 2016
(Dollars in millions)Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
Risk-based capital$2,023
 $6,797
 $2,241
 $5,883
Total regulatory capital4,935
 6,797
 3,678
 5,883
Total regulatory capital ratio4.00% 5.51% 4.00% 6.40%
Leverage capital$6,169
 $10,195
 $4,597
 $8,825
Leverage ratio5.00% 8.26% 5.00% 9.60%

50


Table of Contents


The Bank repurchased $414 million in excess capital stock during 2017. As a result of changes in the Bank’s capital plan in 2015 that reduced the activity-based capital stock requirement to 2.7% for outstanding advances and 0.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, both capital stock and retained earnings are required to support regulatory capital compliance.

Regulatory Capital Requirements
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in millions)RequiredActualRequiredActual
Risk-based capital$1,054 $5,896 $1,404 $5,966 
Total regulatory capital$2,165 $5,896 $2,745 $5,966 
Total regulatory capital ratio4.00 %10.89 %4.00 %8.69 %
Leverage capital$2,706 $8,844 $3,432 $8,949 
Leverage ratio5.00 %16.34 %5.00 %13.04 %
The Bank’s capital requirements are more fully discussed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1511 – Capital.”

Risk Management

The Bank has an integrated corporate governance and internal control framework designed to support effective management of the Bank’s business activities and the risks inherent in these activities. As part of this framework, the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has adopted a Risk Governance Policy that outlines the key roles and responsibilities of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and management and sets forth how the Bank is organized to achieve its risk management objectives, including the implementation of the Bank’s strategic objectives, risk management strategies, corporate governance, and standards of conduct. The policy also establishes the Bank’s risk governance organizational structure and identifies the general roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors and management in establishing risk management policies, procedures, and guidelines; in overseeing the enterprise risk profile; and in implementing enterprise risk management processes and business strategies. The policy establishes an independent risk oversight function to identify, assess, measure, monitor, and report on the enterprise risk profile and risk management capabilities of the Bank.

47

Table of Contents
The Bank’s Risk Appetite Framework establishes a standardized process whereby the Bank’s risk managementappetite is articulated and established, and adherence to the Bank’s risk appetite is monitored by the risk oversight function and reported to the board.Additionally, the Risk Appetite Framework links risk-taking and risk-mitigating activities to the achievement of the Bank’s strategic objectives and helps bring forth key metrics within the Bank to enable better risk insights and decision making. The framework includes athe Bank’s risk appetite statement, risk policies,statements and related proceduresqualitative statements and guidelinesquantitative risk metrics and tolerances, as established by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and performed by management to addressmonitor and manage risk. These include both enterprise-wide risk policies and related procedures and guidelines.

accordingly.
The Risk Management Policy establishes risk limits, guidelines, and standards for creditthe Bank’s management of financial risk (credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operationsand mortgage asset risk), operational risk (people, process, and systems risk), strategic risk, and businessregulatory and compliance risk in accordance with Finance Agency regulations and consideration of industry leading practices, the risk profiletolerances established by the Boardboard of Directors,directors, and other applicable guidelines in connection with the Bank’s overall risk management. The Member Products Policy, which applies to products offered to members and housing associates (nonmember mortgagees approved under Title II of the National Housing Act, to which the Bank is permitted to make advances under the FHLBank Act), addresses the credit risk of secured credit by establishing credit underwriting criteria, appropriate collateralization levels, and collateral valuation methodologies. The Bank also establishes polices for capital management and compliance risk management.

BusinessStrategic Risk

BusinessStrategic risk is defined as the possibility of an adverse impact on the Bank’s ability to fulfill its mission and to meet ongoing business and profitability objectives resultingthat results from external factors that may occur in both the shortshort- and long term.long-term. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, continued financial services industry consolidation; changes in the membership base and in member demand for Bank products; the concentration of borrowing among members; the introduction of new competing products and services; increased inter-FHLBank and non-FHLBank competition; andor significant adverse changes to the effectiveness and competitiveness of the Bank’s products, services, or business model associated with regulatory and legislative changes.
The identification of businessstrategic risks is an integral part of the Bank’s annual planning process, and the Bank’s strategic plan identifies initiatives and plans to address these risks.

OperationsOperational Risk

OperationsOperational risk is defined as the risk of loss to the Bank resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, resources, and systems, and from external events. The Bank’s operationsoperational risk is controlled through a system of

51


Table of Contents

internal controls designed to minimize the risk of operational losses. Also, theThe Bank has established and annually tests its business continuity plan under various business disruption scenarios involvingthat would involve offsite recovery and the testingan assessment of the Bank’s availability and integrity of its operations and information systems. In addition, an ongoing internal audit function audits significant risk areas to evaluate the Bank’s internal controls.

Regulatory and Compliance Risk
Regulatory and compliance risk is defined as noncompliance with laws, rules, regulations, agreements, prescribed practices, and ethical standards, including noncompliance with employee-related regulations. Regulatory and compliance risk tolerances determined by the board of directors are outlined in the Risk Appetite Framework. The board of director's objective is to manage and mitigate the impact of noncompliance with all regulations and laws applicable to the Bank. Additionally, the Bank will put in place the necessary processes, controls, and frameworks to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. This includes, but is not limited to, directing resources to compliance programs to train personnel and increase awareness of those regulatory areas that pose the highest level of risk to the Bank.
Financial Risk
Financial risk is defined as the variance of the company’s financial position or ability to operate due to investment decisions and financial risk management practices specifically related to capital, credit, market (including hedging and funding), mortgage asset, and liquidity risks. Subsequent sections of this document outline the definitions and management of various risk components of the Bank’s financial risk tolerances, as determined by the board of directors.
48

Table of Contents
Concentration Risk

Concentration risk for the Bank is defined as the exposure to loss arising from a disproportionately large number of financial transactions with a limited number of individual customers or counterparties.

Advances. The following tables present the concentration in advances and the interest income (before the impact of interest rate exchange agreements associated with advances) from the advances to the Bank’s top five borrowers and their affiliates at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Concentration of Advances and Interest Income from Advances
Top Five Borrowers and Their Affiliates
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2021
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances
First Republic Bank$3,700 22 %$115 28 %
MUFG Union Bank, National Association2,050 12 103 25 
First Technology Federal Credit Union(2)
1,819 11 28 
Luther Burbank Savings(2)
752 14 
Pacific Premier Bank550 — — 
Subtotal8,871 53 260 64 
Others7,987 47 147 36 
Total par value$16,858 100 %$407 100 %
December 31, 2020
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances
First Republic Bank$11,755 39 %$254 29 %
MUFG Union Bank, National Association4,575 15 173 20 
First Technology Federal Credit Union(2)
1,292 43 
CIT Bank, National Association1,100 23 
Luther Burbank Savings(2)
807 21 
Subtotal19,529 64 514 59 
Others10,809 36 353 41 
Total par value$30,338 100 %$867 100 %
Concentration of Advances and Interest Income from Advances
Top Five Borrowers and Their Affiliates
        
(Dollars in millions)       
December 31, 2017
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding

 Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)

 Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Charles Schwab Bank$15,000
 19% $40
 5%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
11,363
 15
 174
 19
First Republic Bank8,400
 11
 112
 12
MUFG Union Bank, National Association7,250
 9
 48
 5
Bank of the West6,409
 8
 87
 10
     Subtotal48,422
 62
 461
 51
Others29,064
 38
 438
 49
Total par value$77,486
 100% $899
 100%
(1)    Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.

December 31, 2016       
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
$14,807
 30% $119
 23%
Bank of the West7,305
 14
 49
 9
First Republic Bank5,900
 12
 70
 13
CIT Bank, N.A.2,411
 5
 28
 5
Star One Credit Union2,024
 4
 27
 5
     Subtotal32,447
 65
 293
 55
Others17,410
 35
 240
 45
Total par value$49,857
 100% $533
 100%

(1)Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.
(2)Nonmember institution.

(2)    An officer or director of the member was a Bank director.
Because of this concentration in advances, the Bank may perform more frequent credit and collateral reviews for some of these institutions, including more frequent analysis of detailed data on pledged loan collateral to assess the credit quality and risk-based valuation of the loans. The Bank also analyzes the implications for its financial

52


Table of Contents

management and profitability if it were to lose the advances business of one or more of these institutions or if the advances outstanding to one or more of these institutions were not replaced when repaid.

If these institutions were to prepay the advances (subject to the Bank’s limitations on the amount of advances prepayments from a single borrower in a day or a month) or repay the advances as they came due and no other advances were made to replace them, the Bank’s assets would decrease significantly and income could be adversely affected. In addition, because JPMorgan Chase is not a member
49

Table of the Bank, it is not able to borrow new advances from the Bank or replace outstanding advances as they are repaid or prepaid, so a decrease in advances outstanding to JPMorgan Chase, if they are not replaced with advances to other members or other assets, will result in lower total assets and may result in lower net income for the Bank.Contents
affected. The timing and magnitude of the impact would depend on a number of factors, including: (i) the amount of advances prepaid or repaid and the period over which the advances were prepaid or repaid, (ii) the amount and timing of any decreases in capital, (iii) the profitability of the advances, (iv) the size and profitability of the Bank’s investments, (v) the extent to which debt matured as the advances were prepaid or repaid, and (vi) the ability of the Bank to extinguish debt or transfer it to other FHLBanks and the costs to extinguish or transfer the debt. As discussed in “Item 1. Business – Our Business Model,” the Bank’s financial strategies are designed to enable it to expand and contract its assets, liabilities, and capital in view of changes in membership composition and member credit needs while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank’s capital stock.needs. Under the Bank’s capital plan, the Bank may repurchase all of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, including any excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements.

MPF Program. The Bank had the following concentration in MPF loans with institutions whose outstanding total of mortgage loans sold to the Bank represented 10% or more of the Bank’s total outstanding mortgage loans at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Concentration of Mortgage Loans
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2021
Name of InstitutionMortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding
Fremont Bank$344 36 %641 17 %
Bank of Hope128 13 321 
Community First Credit Union122 13 370 10 
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
101 11 1,369 37 
Logix Federal Credit Union99 10 333 
Subtotal794 83 3,034 82 
Others160 17 696 18 
Total$954 100 %3,730 100 %
December 31, 2020
Name of InstitutionMortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding
Fremont Bank$878 46 %1,581 27 %
Bank of Hope240 13 574 10 
Logix Federal Credit Union224 12 664 11 
Subtotal1,342 71 2,819 48 
Others564 29 3,144 52 
Total$1,906 100 %5,963 100 %
Concentration of Mortgage Loans
        
(Dollars in millions)       
December 31, 2017       
Name of Institution
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

Fremont Bank$1,145
 57% 2,121
 27%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
249
 12
 3,244
 40
Subtotal1,394
 69
 5,365
 67
Others611
 31
 2,635
 33
Total$2,005
 100% 8,000
 100%
December 31, 2016       
Name of Institution
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
$323
 40% 4,065
 59%
Bank of Hope(2)
132
 16
 319
 5
Fremont Bank99
 12
 211
 3
Kinecta Federal Credit Union90
 11
 167
 3
Subtotal644
 79
 4,762
 70
Others170
 21
 2,089
 30
Total$814
 100% 6,851
 100%

(1)(1)    Nonmember institution.
(2)Effective July 29, 2016, Wilshire Bank merged with and into BBCN Bank, which was renamed Bank of Hope.


53


Table of Contents

Members that sellsold mortgage loans to the Bank through the MPF Program make representations and warranties that the loans comply with the MPF underwriting guidelines. In the event a mortgage loan does not comply with the MPF underwriting guidelines, the Bank’s agreement with the participating financial institution provides that the institution is required to repurchase the loan as a result of the breach of the institution’s representations and warranties. The Bank may, at its discretion, choose to retain the loan if the Bank determines that the noncompliance can be cured or mitigated through additional contract assurances from the institution or any successor. In addition, most participating financial institutions have retained the servicing on the mortgage loans purchased by the Bank, and the servicing obligation of any former participating financial institution is held by the successor or another Bank-approved financial institution. The FHLBank of Chicago (the MPF Provider and master servicer) has contracted with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, to monitor the servicing performed by all
50

Table of Contents
participating financial institutions and successors, including Bank of Hope; Fremont Bank; Community First Credit Union; JPMorgan Chase Bank, of Hope, Fremont Bank,National Association; and KinectaLogix Federal Credit Union. The Bank obtains a Type II Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 18 service auditor's report to confirm the effectiveness of the MPF Provider's controls over the services it provides to the Bank, including its monitoring of the participating financial institutions’ servicing. The FHLBank of Chicago outsourced a portion of its infrastructure controls to a third party, and the SSAE No. 18 service auditor’s report addresses the effectiveness of certain controls performed by the third party. The Bank has the right to transfer the servicing at any time, without paying the participating financial institution or any successor a servicing termination fee, in the event a participating financial institution or any successor does not meet the MPF servicing requirements. The Bank may also transfer servicing without cause subject to a servicing transfer fee payable to the participating financial institution or any successor.

Investments. The following table presents the portfolio concentration in the Bank’s investment portfolios at December 31, 2017 and 2016, with U.S. government corporation and GSE issuers and other issuers (at the time of purchase), whose aggregate carrying values representedCapital Stock. No institution held 10% or more of the Bank’s capital (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock). The amounts include securities issued by the issuer’s holding company, along with its affiliated companies. The Bank’s investment portfolio includes securities classified as trading, AFS, and HTM, and other assets such as securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest-bearing deposits, and Federal funds sold.

Investments: Portfolio Concentration

 2017 2016
(In millions)
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Non-MBS:       
Certificates of deposit       
Toronto Dominion Bank$
 $
 $600
 $600
Other(1)
500
 500
 750
 750
Total Certificates of deposit500
 500
 1,350
 1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:       
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds187
 178
 225
 207
GSEs:       
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds1,158
 1,158
 2,058
 2,058
Total non-MBS1,845
 1,836
 3,633
 3,615
MBS:       
Other U.S. obligations:       
Ginnie Mae757
 757
 959
 963
GSEs:       
Freddie Mac6,690
 6,687
 4,349
 4,356
Fannie Mae5,731
 5,759
 6,095
 6,127
Total GSEs12,421
 12,446
 10,444
 10,483

54


Table of Contents

Investments: Portfolio Concentration (continued)

 2017 2016
(In millions)
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

PLRMBS:       
Bank of America Corporation
 
 550
 548
Bear Stearns Companies Inc.
 
 528
 528
Countrywide Financial Corporation665
 665
 802
 801
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.697
 705
 802
 811
Lehman Brothers Inc.701
 701
 919
 916
UBS AG
 
 529
 526
Other(1)
2,591
 2,591
 1,516
 1,505
Total PLRMBS4,654
 4,662
 5,646
 5,635
Total MBS17,832
 17,865
 17,049
 17,081
Total securities19,677
 19,701
 20,682
 20,696
Securities purchased under agreements to resell:
       
Daiwa Capital Markets America, Inc.1,500
 1,500
 
 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York7,250
 7,250
 15,500
 15,500
HSBC Securities (USA), Inc.1,000
 1,000
 
 
Nomura Securities International, Inc.2,000
 2,000
 
 
Total Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 11,750
 15,500
 15,500
Federal funds sold:       
Australia & New Zealand Bank Group1,725
 1,725
 1,033
 1,033
The Bank of New York Mellon1,033
 1,033
 
 
Bank of Nova Scotia1,100
 1,100
 688
 688
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ1,108
 1,108
 
 
Nordea Bank Finland1,000
 1,000
 
 
Rabobank Nederland804
 804
 
 
Societe Generale
 
 688
 688
Other(1)
4,258
 4,259
 1,805
 1,805
Total Federal funds sold11,028
 11,029
 4,214
 4,214
Interest-bearing deposits       
Citibank, N.A.1,075
 1,075
 590
 590
Other(1)
40
 40
 
 
Total interest-bearing deposits1,115
 1,115
 590
 590
Total investments$43,570
 $43,595
 $40,986
 $41,000

(1)Includes issuers of securities that have a carrying value that is less than 10% of total Bank capital (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock).

Many of the Bank’s members and their affiliates are extensively involved in residential mortgage finance. Accordingly, members or their affiliates may be involved in the sale of MBS to the Bank or in the origination or securitization of the mortgage loans backing the MBS purchased by the Bank.

Capital Stock. The following table presents the concentration inoutstanding capital stock, as of December 31, 2021. First Republic Bank held by institutions whose capital stock ownership represented 10%$354 million, or more16%, of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of December 31, 20172020. No other institution held 10% or 2016.more of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2020.


55


Table of Contents

 2017 2016
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Charles Schwab Bank$405
 11% $81
 3%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
307
 9
 400
 14
Subtotal712
 20
 481
 17
Others2,840
 80
 2,346
 83
Total$3,552
 100% $2,827
 100%

(1)The capital stock held by this nonmember institution is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Derivative Counterparties. The following table presents the concentration in derivatives with derivative counterparties whose outstanding notional balances represented 10% or more of the Bank’s total notional amount of derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Concentration of Derivative Counterparties
(Dollars in millions)20212020
Derivative Counterparty
Credit  
Rating(1)  
Notional
Amount
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount
Credit  
Rating(1)  
Notional
Amount
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount
Uncleared
OthersAt least BBB$18,381 29 %At least BBB$7,227 %
Subtotal uncleared18,381 29 7,227 
Cleared
LCH Ltd(2)
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCA— — A28,977 37 
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLCA33,268 52 A42,440 54 
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLCA11,967 19 A— — 
Subtotal cleared45,235 71 71,417 91 
Total(3)
$63,616 100 %$78,644 100 %
(1)The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) or S&P Global Ratings (S&P) ratings. 
Concentration of Derivative Counterparties
            
(Dollars in millions)2017 2016
Derivative Counterparty
Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

 
Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

Uncleared           
OthersAt least BBB $13,900
 14% At least BBB $10,032
 15%
Subtotal uncleared  13,900
 14
   10,032
 15
Cleared           
LCH Ltd(2)
           
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCA 54,371
 55
 A 30,548
 47
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLCA 31,322
 31
 A 20,994
 33
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
 
 
 BBB 3,482
 5
Subtotal cleared  85,693
 86
   55,024
 85
Total(3)
  $99,593
 100%   $65,056
 100%
(2)London Clearing House (LCH) Ltd is the Bank’s counterparty for all of its cleared swaps and was rated AA- with a Stable CreditWatch by S&P at December 31, 2021 and 2020. For purposes of clearing swaps with LCH Ltd, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC are the Bank’s clearing agents.

(1)The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) or S&P Global Ratings (S&P) ratings. 
(2)London Clearing House (LCH) Ltd is the Bank’s counterparty for all of its cleared swaps. For purposes of clearing swaps with LCH Ltd, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC are the Bank’s clearing agents, and Deutsche Bank Securities Incorporated was one of the Bank’s clearing agents until March 2017. LCH Ltd’s parent, LCH Group Holdings Limited, was rated A+ by S&P. On May 31, 2017, S&P lowered the rating to A and withdrew the rating at LCH Group Holdings Limited’s request. LCH Ltd’s ultimate parent, London Stock Exchange Group, plc., is rated A3 by Moody’s and A- by S&P.
(3)Total notional amount at December 31, 2017 and 2016, does not include $16 million and $13 million of mortgage delivery commitments with members, respectively.

(3)Total notional amount at December 31, 2020, does not include $1 million of mortgage delivery commitments with members.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Bank will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or meet the credit needs of its members and eligible nonmember borrowers in a timely and cost-effective manner. The Bank is required to maintain liquidity for operating needs and for contingency purposes in accordance with Finance Agency regulations and guidelines and with the Bank'sBank’s own Risk Management Policy. The Bank strives to maintain the liquidity necessary to repay maturing consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor, meet other obligations and commitments, and meet expected and unexpected member credit demands. The Bank monitors its financial position in order to maintain ready access to sufficient liquid funds to meet normal transaction requirements, take advantage of appropriate investment opportunities, and cover unforeseen liquidity demands.


56


Table of Contents

The Bank generally manages operational, contingent, and structural liquidityrefinancing risks using a portfolio of cash and short-term investments and access to the debt capital markets. In addition, the Bank maintains alternate sources of funds, detailed in its contingent liquidityfunding plan, which also includes an explanation of how sources of funds may be allocated under stressed market conditions, such as short-term operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance or short-term disruptions in the debt capital markets. The Bank maintains short-term, high-quality money market investments and government and agency securities in amounts that may average up to three times the Bank’s capital as a primary source
51

Table of funds to satisfy these requirements and objectives.Contents

The Bank has a regulatory contingent liquidity requirement to maintain at least 5 business days of liquidity to enable it to meet its obligations without issuance of new consolidated obligations. In addition, the Finance Agency has established base case liquidity guidelinesthatrequire each FHLBank to maintain sufficient on-balance sheet liquidity in an amount at least equal to its anticipated cash outflows, for two different scenarios. Both scenarios assumeassuming no new consolidated obligation issuance, renewal of all maturing advances, a specified percentage drawdown on letters of credit balances, and no reliance on repurchase agreements and permit the sale of certain existingTreasury investments as determined bya source of funds. The Finance Agency’s guidance provides that base case liquidity should generally be maintained for 10 to 30 days. The Bank actively monitors and manages refinancing risk. Finance Agency guidance specifies tolerance levels related to the size of each FHLBank’s funding gaps to measure refinancing risk as the difference between assets and liabilities that are scheduled to mature during a specified period, expressed as a percentage of total assets. The guidance limits three-month and one-year funding gaps between the range of –10% to –20% and –25% to –35%, respectively. Funding gaps are measured at monthend, using the average ratio for the three most recent monthends. The Bank is also required to perform an annual liquidity stress test and to report the results to the Finance Agency. The two scenarios differ only in the treatment of maturing advances. One scenario assumes that the Bank does not renew any maturing advances. For this scenario, the Bank must have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for 15 calendar days. The second scenario requires the Bank to renew maturing advances for certain members based on specific criteria established by the Finance Agency. For this scenario, the Bank must have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for 5 calendar days.

In addition to the regulatory contingent liquidity requirement and the Finance Agency’s guidelines on contingent liquidity, the Bank models its cash commitments and expected cash flows on a daily basis to determine its projected liquidity position. If a market or operational disruption occurred that prevented the issuance of new consolidated obligations, the Bank could meet its obligations by: (i) allowing short-term liquid investments to mature, (ii) using eligible securities as collateral for repurchase agreement borrowings, and (iii) if necessary, allowing advances to mature without renewal. In addition, the Bank may be able to borrow on a short-term unsecured basis from other financial institutions (Federal funds purchased) or other FHLBanks (inter-FHLBank borrowings).

The Bank actively monitorsAs of December 31, 2021 and manages structural liquidity risks, which2020, the Bank defines as maturity mismatches greater than 90 days for sources and uses of funds, of the advances business segment. Structural liquidity maturity mismatches are identified using maturity gap analysis and valuation sensitivity metrics that quantify the risk associated with the Bank’s structural liquidity position.

The following table shows the Bank’s principal financial obligations due, estimatedheld total sources of funds availablein an amount that would have allowed the Bank to meet thoseits liquidity needs without issuing new consolidated obligations andfor over ten days, in accordance with the net difference between funds available and funds needed forFinance Agency guidance. In addition, the 5-business-day period followingBank’s funding gap positions as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.

Principal Financial Obligations Due and Funds Available for Selected Period
    
 As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016
(In millions)5 Business Days 5 Business Days
Obligations due:   
Demand deposits$299
 $184
Loans from other FHLBanks
 1,345
Discount note and bond maturities and expected exercises of bond call options3,950
 2,412
Subtotal obligations due4,249
 3,941
Sources of available funds:   
Maturing investments21,613
 19,175
Available cash27
 1
Proceeds from scheduled settlements of discount notes and bonds635
 1,346
Maturing advances and scheduled prepayments7,854
 7,121
Subtotal sources of available funds30,129
 27,643
Net funds available$25,880
 $23,702

57


Table of Contents


2020, were within the tolerance levels provided by the Finance Agency guidance.
In addition, Section 11(i) of the FHLBank Act authorizes the U.S. Treasury to purchase certain obligations issued by the FHLBanks aggregating not more than $4.0 billion under certain conditions. There were no such purchases by the U.S. Treasury during the two-year period ended December 31, 2017.2021.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is defined as the risk that the market value, or estimated fair value if market value is not available, of an obligation will decline as a result of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the obligor. The Bank further refines the definition of credit risk as the risk that a secured or unsecured borrower is unable to meet its financial obligations and the Bank is inadequately protected by the liquidation value of collateral, if any, which could result in a credit loss to the Bank.

Advances. The Bank manages the credit risk of advances and other credit products by setting the credit and collateral terms available to individual members and housing associates based on their creditworthiness and on the quality and value of the assets they pledge as collateral. The Bank also has procedures to assess the mortgage loan quality and documentation standards of institutions that pledge mortgage loan collateral. In addition, the Bank has collateral policies and restricted lending procedures in place to help manage its exposure to institutions that experience difficulty in meeting their capital requirements or other standards of creditworthiness. These credit and collateral policies balance the Bank’s dual goals of meeting the needs of members and housing associates as a reliable source of liquidity and mitigating credit risk by adjusting credit and collateral terms in view of deterioration in creditworthiness. The Bank has never experienced a credit loss on an advance.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a member or housing associate based on the institution’s creditworthiness and eligible collateral pledged in accordance with the Bank’s credit and collateral policies and regulatory requirements. The Bank may review and change the maximum amount and maximum term at any time. The maximum amount a member or housing associate may borrow is also limited by the amount and type of collateral pledged because all advances must be fully collateralized.

To identify the credit strength of each borrower and potential borrower, other than insurance companies, community development financial institutions (CDFIs), and housing associates, the Bank assigns each member and each nonmember borrower an internal credit quality rating from one to ten, with one as the highest credit quality rating.
52

Table of Contents
These ratings are based on results from the Bank’s credit model, which considers financial, regulatory, and other qualitative information, including regulatory examination reports. The internal ratings are reviewed on an ongoing basis using current available information and are revised, if necessary, to reflect the institution’s current financial position. Credit and collateral terms may be adjusted based on the results of this credit analysis.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to an insurance company based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers the member's financial and regulatory standing and other qualitative information deemed relevant by the Bank. This evaluation results in the assignment of an internal credit quality rating from one to ten, with one as the highest credit quality rating. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual member while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks associated with insurance companies, including risks related to the resolution process for insurance companies, which is significantly different from the resolution processes established for the Bank’s insured depository members.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a CDFI based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers information from the CDFI’s audited annual financial statements, supplemented by additional information deemed relevant by the Bank. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual member while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks of CDFIs, which do not file quarterly regulatory financial reports and are not subject to the same inspection and regulation requirements as the Bank’s insured depository members.


58


Table of Contents

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a housing associate based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers the housing associate’s financial and regulatory standing and other qualitative information deemed relevant by the Bank. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual housing associate while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks of housing associates, which do not file quarterly regulatory financial reports and are not subject to the same inspection and regulation requirements as the Bank’s insured depository members.

The Bank underwrites and actively monitors the financial condition and performance of all borrowers to determine and periodically assess creditworthiness. The Bank uses, to the extent available, financial information provided by the borrower, quarterly financial reports filed by borrowers with their primary regulators, regulatory examination reports and known regulatory enforcement actions, and public information. In determining creditworthiness, the Bank considers available examination findings, performance trends and forward-looking information, the borrower's business model, changes in risk profile, capital adequacy, asset quality, profitability, interest rate risk, supervisory history, the results of periodic collateral field reviews conducted by the Bank, the risk profile of the collateral, and the amount of eligible collateral on the borrower's balance sheet.

In accordance with the FHLBank Act, borrowers may pledge the following eligible assets to secure advances: one- to four-family
one-to-four-family first lien residential mortgage loans; multifamily mortgage loans; MBS;
securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies, including without limitation MBS backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae;
cash or deposits in the Bank; and
certain other real estate-related collateral, such as certain privately issued mortgage-backed securities, multifamily loans, commercial real estate loans, and second lien residential mortgage loans or home equity loans. The Bank may also accept loans; and
small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions.
The Housing Act defined community financial institutions as depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with average total assets over the preceding three-year period of $1 billion or less, to be adjusted for inflation annually by the Finance Agency. The average total asset cap for 20172021 was $1,148$1,239 million.

Under the Bank’s written lending agreements with its borrowers, its credit and collateral policies, and applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, the Bank has the right to take a variety of actions to address credit and collateral concerns, including calling for the borrower to pledge additional or substitute collateral (including ineligible collateral) at any time that advances are outstanding to the borrower, and requiring the delivery of all pledged collateral. In addition, if a borrower fails to repay any advance or is otherwise in default on its obligations to the Bank, the Bank may foreclose on and liquidate the borrower’s collateral and apply the proceeds toward repayment of the borrower’s obligations to the Bank. The Bank’s collateral policies are designed to address changes in the value of collateral and the risks and costs relating to foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, and the Bank periodically adjusts the amount it is willing to lend against various types of collateral to reflect these factors. Market conditions, the volume and condition of the borrower’s collateral at the time of liquidation, and other factors could affect the amount of proceeds the Bank is able to realize from liquidating a borrower’s collateral. In addition, the Bank could sell collateral over an extended period of time, rather than liquidating it immediately, and the Bank would have the right to receive principal and interest payments made on the collateral it continued to hold and apply those proceeds toward repayment of the borrower’s obligations to the Bank.

The Bank perfects its security interest in securities collateral by taking delivery of all securities at the time they are pledged. The Bank perfects its security interest in loan collateral by filing a UCC-1Uniform Commercial Code-1 financing statement for each borrower that pledges loans. The Bank may also require delivery of loan collateral under certain conditions (for example, from a newly formed institution or when a borrower's creditworthiness deteriorates below a certain level). In addition, the FHLBank Act provides that any security interest granted to the Bank by any member or member affiliate has priority over the claims and rights of any other party, including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar entity that has the rights of a lien creditor, unless these claims and rights would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law or are held by bona fide purchasers for value or by parties that have actual perfected security interests.

5953


Table of Contents


Pursuant to the Bank’s lending agreements with its borrowers, the Bank limits extensions of credit to individual borrowers to a percentage of the market value or unpaid principal balance of the borrower’s pledged collateral, known as the borrowing capacity.capacity, which the Bank can change from time to time. The borrowing capacity percentage varies according to several factors, including the charter type of the institution, the collateral type, the value assigned to the collateral, the results of the Bank’s collateral field review of the borrower’s collateral, the pledging method used for loan collateral (specific identification or blanket lien), the amount of loan data provided (detailed or summary reporting), the data reporting frequency (monthly or quarterly), the borrower’s financial strength and condition, and any institution-specific collateral risks. Under the terms of the Bank’s lending agreements, the aggregate borrowing capacity of a borrower’s pledged eligible collateral must meet or exceed the total amount of the borrower’s outstanding advances, other extensions of credit, and certain other borrower obligations and liabilities. The Bank monitors each borrower’s aggregate borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis by comparing the institution’s borrowing capacity to its obligations to the Bank.

In addition, the total amount of advances made available to each member or housing associate may be limited by the financing availability assigned by the Bank, which is generally expressed as a percentage of the member’s or housing associate’s assets.assets, which the Bank can change from time to time. The amount of financing availability is generally determined by the creditworthiness of the member or housing associate.

When a nonmember financial institution acquires some or all of the assets and liabilities of a member, including outstanding advances and Bank capital stock, the Bank may allow the advances to remain outstanding, at its discretion. The nonmember borrower is required to meet the Bank’s applicable credit, collateral, and capital stock requirements, including requirements regarding creditworthiness and collateral borrowing capacity.

The following tables present a summary of the status of the credit outstanding and overall collateral borrowing capacity of the Bank’s member and nonmember borrowers as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016. During 2017, the Bank’s internal credit ratings stayed the same or improved for the majority of members and nonmember borrowers.2020.
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Credit Quality Rating
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2021

All Members and
Nonmembers
Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
   
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
NumberNumber
Credit
Outstanding(1)
TotalUsed
1-3260 127 $26,398 $213,172 12 %
4-664 32 7,158 33,733 21 
7-1020 37 54 
Subtotal327 161 33,576 246,942 14 
CDFIs112 135 83 
Housing associates— — — — 
Total336 168 $33,688 $247,077 14 %
54
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Credit Quality Rating
          
(Dollars in millions)         
December 31, 2017         
  
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
       
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
1-3265
 155
 $84,257
 $240,247
 35%
4-658
 25
 9,255
 22,005
 42
7-104
 1
 
 25
 
Subtotal327
 181
 93,512
 262,277
 36
CDFIs6
 4
 78
 99
 79
Housing associates2
 1
 107
 112
 96
Total335
 186
 $93,697
 $262,488
 36%

60


Table of Contents

December 31, 2020
 All Members and
Nonmembers
Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
   
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
NumberNumber
Credit
Outstanding(1)
TotalUsed
1-3236 164 $37,225 $188,637 20 %
4-695 59 12,508 50,199 25 
7-1032 34 94 
Subtotal335 225 49,765 238,870 21 
CDFIs103 116 89 
Housing associates— — — — 
Total344 232 $49,868 $238,986 21 %
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
December 31, 2016         
 
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
       
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
1-3266
 155
 $55,290
 $181,405
 30%
4-662
 28
 9,662
 22,606
 43
7-103
 2
 17
 46
 37
Subtotal331
 185
 64,969
 204,057
 32
CDFIs6
 3
 60
 82
 73
Housing associates2
 1
 10
 16
 63
Total339
 189
 $65,039
 $204,155
 32%
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.

Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Unused Borrowing Capacity
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2021
Unused Borrowing CapacityNumber of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding
Credit
Outstanding(1)
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)
0% – 10%$467 $512 
11% – 25%895 1,079 
26% – 50%15 1,837 3,032 
More than 50%140 30,489 242,454 
Total168 $33,688 $247,077 
December 31, 2020
Unused Borrowing CapacityNumber of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding
Credit
Outstanding(1)
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)
0% – 10%18 $1,417 $1,511 
11% – 25%116 137 
26% – 50%27 9,858 18,210 
More than 50%184 38,477 219,128 
Total232 $49,868 $238,986 
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Unused Borrowing Capacity
      
(Dollars in millions)     
December 31, 2017     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%4
 $160
 $169
11% – 25%4
 553
 672
26% – 50%35
 33,571
 54,487
More than 50%143
 59,413
 207,160
Total186
 $93,697
 $262,488
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
December 31, 2016     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%2
 $26
 $27
11% – 25%9
 1,791
 2,261
26% – 50%30
 33,096
 52,503
More than 50%148
 30,126
 149,364
Total189
 $65,039
 $204,155
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.

(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.
Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the advances. Therefore, no allowance for credit losses on advances is deemed necessary by the Bank. The Bank has never experienced any credit losses on advances.

Securities pledged as collateral are assigned borrowing capacities that reflect the securities’ pricing volatilitymarket valuations and market liquidityliquidation risks. Securities are delivered to the Bank’s custodian when they are pledged. The Bank prices securities collateral on a daily basis or twice a month, depending on the availability and reliability of external pricing sources. Securities that are normally priced twice a month may be priced more frequently in volatile market conditions. The Bank benchmarks the borrowing capacities for securities collateral to the market on a periodic basis and may review and change the borrowing capacity for any security type at any time. As of December 31, 2017, the

61



borrowing capacities assigned to U.S. Treasury and agency securities ranged from 75% to 98% of their market value. The borrowing capacities assigned to private-label MBS, which must be rated AAA or AA when initially pledged, generally ranged from 65% to 85% of their market value, depending on the underlying collateral (residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, or commercial real estate loans), the rating, and the subordination structure of the respective securities.

The following table presents the securities collateral pledged by all members and by nonmembers with credit outstanding at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.
55

Table of Contents
Composition of Securities Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
Composition of Securities Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
Composition of Securities Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
       
(In millions)2017 2016(In millions)20212020
Securities Type with Current Credit RatingsCurrent Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

 Current Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

Securities Type with Current Credit RatingsCurrent ParBorrowing
Capacity
Current ParBorrowing
Capacity
U.S. Treasury (bills, notes, bonds)$1,946
 $1,875
 $2,377
 $2,315
U.S. Treasury (bills, notes, bonds)$659 $631 $195 $190 
Agency (notes, subordinated debt, structured notes, indexed amortization notes, and Small Business Administration pools)3,135
 3,019
 3,147
 3,063
Agency (notes, subordinated debt, structured notes, indexed amortization notes, and Small Business Administration pools)4,192 3,978 4,236 4,120 
Agency pools and collateralized mortgage obligations34,182
 32,755
 8,986
 8,559
Agency pools and collateralized mortgage obligations17,571 16,553 16,399 15,758 
PLRMBS – publicly registered investment-grade-rated senior tranches
 
 1
 
Private-label commercial MBS – publicly registered investment-grade-rated senior tranches3
 2
 
 
Private-label commercial MBS – publicly registered investment-grade-rated senior tranches
PLRMBS – private placement investment-grade-rated senior tranches68
 51
 83
 62
Municipal Bonds – investment-grade-rated55
 49
 61
 55
PLRMBS – private label investment-grade-rated senior tranchesPLRMBS – private label investment-grade-rated senior tranches311 194 18 12 
Term deposits with the BankTerm deposits with the Bank18 18 16 16 
Total$39,389
 $37,751
 $14,655
 $14,054
Total$22,755 $21,377 $20,867 $20,099 
With respect to loan collateral, most borrowers may choose to pledge loan collateral by specific identification or under a blanket lien. Insurance companies, CDFIs, and housing associates are required to pledge loan collateral by specific identification with monthly reporting. All other borrowers pledging by specific identification must provide a detailed listing of all the loans pledged to the Bank on a monthly basis. With a blanket lien, a borrower generally pledges the following loan types, whether or not the individual loans are eligible to receive borrowing capacity: all loans secured by real estate; all loans made for commercial, corporate, or business purposes; and all participations in these loans. Borrowers pledging under a blanket lien may provide a detailed listing of loans or may use a summary reporting method.

The Bank may require certain borrowers to deliver pledged loan collateral to the Bank for one or more reasons, including the following: the borrower is a de novo institution (chartered within the last three years), an insurance company, a CDFI, or a housing associate; the Bank is concerned about the borrower’s creditworthiness; or the Bank is concerned about the maintenance of its collateral or the priority of its security interest. With the exception of insurance companies, CDFIs, and housing associates, borrowers required to deliver loan collateral must pledge those loans under a blanket lien with detailed reporting.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, of the loan collateral pledged to the Bank, 24%15% was pledged by 2722 institutions by specific identification, 52%55% was pledged by 121115 institutions under a blanket lien with detailed reporting, and 24%30% was pledged by 126129 institutions under a blanket lien with summary reporting.

The Bank monitors each borrower’s borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis. The borrowing capacities for loan collateral reflect the assignedvalue of the collateral and a margin for the costs and risks of liquidation. The Bank reviews the margins for loan collateral regularly and may adjust them at any time as market conditions change.


62



The Bank assigns a value to loan collateral using one of two methods. For mortgage loans that are reported to the Bank with detailed information on the individual loans, the Bank uses third-party pricing vendors to price all the loans on a quarterly basis. The third-party vendors use proprietary analytical tools to calculate the value of each loan. The vendors model the future performance of each individual loan and generate the monthly cash flows given the current loan characteristics and applying specific market assumptions. The value of each loan is determined based on the present value of those cash flows after being discounted by the current market yields commonly used by buyers of these types of loans. The current market yields are derived by the third-party pricing vendors from prevailing conditions in the secondary market. For mortgage loans pledged under a blanket lien with summary reporting, the Bank establishes a standard market value for each collateral type based on quarterly pricing results.

For each borrower that pledges loan collateral, the Bank conducts loan collateral field reviews once every six months or every one, two, or three years, depending on the risk profile of the borrower and the types of collateral pledged by the borrower. During the borrower's collateral field review, the Bank examines a statistical sample of the borrower's pledged loans to validate loan ownership, confirm the existence of the critical legal documents, identify documentation and servicing deficiencies, and verify eligibility. Based on any loan defects identified in the pool of sample loans, the Bank determines the applicable non-credit secondary market discounts. The Bank also sends the sample loans to a third-party pricing vendor for valuation of the financial and credit-related attributes of the loans. The Bank adjusts the borrower's borrowing capacity for each collateral type in its pledged portfolio based on the pricing of the field review sample loans and the non-credit secondary market discounts identified in the field review.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank’s maximum borrowing capacities as a percentage of the assigned market value of mortgage loan collateral pledged under a blanket lien with detailed reporting were as follows: 90%85% for first lien residential mortgage loans, 88%81% for multifamily mortgage loans, 88%81% for commercial mortgage loans, and 77%70% for second lien residential mortgage loans. The maximum borrowing capacity for small business, small agribusiness, and small farm loans was 50% of the unpaid principal balance, although most of these loans are pledged under blanket lien with summary reporting, with a maximum borrowing capacity of 25%. The highest borrowing capacities are available to borrowers that pledge under a blanket lien with detailed reporting because the detailed loan information allows the Bank to assess the value of the collateral more precisely and because additional collateral is pledged under the blanket lien that may not receive borrowing capacity but may be liquidated to repay advances in the event of default. The Bank may review and change the maximum borrowing capacity for any type of loan collateral at any time.

The following table below presents the mortgage loan collateral pledged by all members and by nonmembers with credit outstanding at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.
2020.
56
Composition of Loan Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
        
(In millions)2017 2016
Loan Type
Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

 
Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

First lien residential mortgage loans$162,740
 $138,937
 $124,257
 $107,775
Second lien residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit22,440
 12,500
 23,238
 13,302
Multifamily mortgage loans26,143
 20,098
 23,191
 19,082
Commercial mortgage loans68,703
 48,759
 62,586
 44,802
Loan participations(1)
4,793
 3,487
 5,450
 4,375
Small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans3,830
 956
 3,016
 765
Other2
 
 
 
Total$288,651
 $224,737
 $241,738
 $190,101


63



(1)The unpaid principal balance for loan participations is 100% of the outstanding loan amount. The borrowing capacity for loan participations is based on the participated amount pledged to the Bank.

Composition of Loan Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
(In millions)20212020
Loan TypeUnpaid Principal
Balance
Borrowing
Capacity
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Borrowing
Capacity
First lien residential mortgage loans$175,319 $140,994 $167,058 $131,671 
Second lien residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit13,659 6,653 15,349 6,441 
Multifamily mortgage loans41,239 28,517 43,324 28,376 
Commercial mortgage loans73,750 48,394 78,886 48,637 
Loan participations(1)
1,064 383 3,783 2,591 
Small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans3,157 759 4,820 1,171 
Total$308,188 $225,700 $313,220 $218,887 
(1)The unpaid principal balance for loan participations is 100% of the outstanding loan amount. The borrowing capacity for loan participations is based on the participated amount pledged to the Bank.
The Bank holds a security interest in subprime residential mortgage loans pledged as collateral. Subprime loans are defined as loans with a borrower FICO score of 660 or less at origination, or if the original FICO score is not available, as loans with a current borrower FICO score of 660 or less. At December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the unpaid principal balance of these loans totaled $9$5 billion and $9$5 billion, respectively. The Bank reviews and assigns borrowing capacities to subprime mortgage loans as it does for all other types of loan collateral, taking into account the known credit attributes in the pricing of the loans. All advances, including those made to borrowers pledging subprime mortgage loans, are required to be fully collateralized. The Bank limits the amount of borrowing capacity that may be supported by subprime collateral.


MPF Program. Under the MPF Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA-insured or VA-guaranteed mortgage loans under the MPF Government product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra product and of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had approved 23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in 2013.

From May 2002 through October 2006, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from its participating financial institutions members under the MPF Original and MPF Plus products. Participating members originated or purchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhanced them and sold them to the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans. Unlike conventional MPF products held for portfolio, under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, MPF Government, and MPF Government MBS products, participating financial institutions are not required to provide credit enhancement and do not receive credit enhancement fees. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition.

The Bank and any participating financial institution share in the credit risk of the loans sold by that institution under the MPF Original and MPF Plus products as specified in a master agreement. As of December 31, 2017,2021, loans purchased under the MPF Program generally had a credit risk exposure at the time of purchase that, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, would be expected from an equivalent investment rated AA if purchased prior to April 2017, or rated BBB if purchased since April 2017, taking into consideration the credit risk sharing structure mandated by the Finance Agency’s acquired member assets (AMA) regulation. The MPF Program structures potential credit losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each pool of loans purchased by the Bank under a single master commitment, as follows:

(1)The first layer of protection against loss is the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
1.The first layer of protection against loss is the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
2.The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with an initial loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
3.
(2)The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with an initial loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
(3)Losses that exceed the liquidation value of the real property and any primary mortgage insurance, up to an agreed-upon amount called the first loss account for each master commitment, are incurred by the Bank.
4.Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to an agreed-upon amount called the “credit enhancement amount,” are covered by the participating financial institution's credit enhancement obligation at the time losses are incurred.
5.Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution's remaining credit enhancement for the master commitment, if any, are incurred by the Bank.


64



The first loss account provided by the Bank is a memorandum account, a record-keeping mechanism the Bank uses to track the amount of potential expected losses for which it is liable on each master commitment (before the participating financial institution's credit enhancement is used to cover losses).

As of December 31, 2017, the credit enhancement amount for each master commitment, together with any primary mortgage insurance coverage, was sized to limitare incurred by the Bank’s credit lossesBank.
(4)Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to those that would be expected on an equivalent investment with a long-term credit rating of AA for loans purchased prior to April 2017 and BBB for loans purchased thereafter, as determinedagreed-upon amount called the “credit enhancement amount,” are covered by the MPF Program methodology. By requiringparticipating financial institution's credit enhancement inobligation at the amount determined by the MPF Program methodology, the Bank expects to have the same probability of incurring credittime losses are incurred.
(5)Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution's remaining credit enhancement obligation onfor the master commitment, if any, are incurred by the Bank.
The Bank performs a quarterly assessment of its mortgage loans purchased under any master commitment as an investor would have of incurringheld for portfolio to estimate expected credit losses. An allowance for credit losses on an equivalent investmentis recorded with a corresponding long-term credit rating.

Before delivering loans for purchase under the MPF Program, each participating financial institution submits data on the individual loansadjustment to the FHLBank of Chicago, which calculates the loan levelprovision for/(reversal of) credit enhancement needed.losses. The rating agency model used considers many characteristics, such as loan-to-value ratio, property type, loan purpose, borrower credit scores, level of loan documentation, and loan term, to determine the loan level credit enhancement. The resulting credit enhancement amount for each loan purchased is accumulated under a master commitment to establish a pool level credit enhancement amount for the master commitment.

The Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio currently consists of mortgage loans purchased under two MPF products: MPF Original and MPF Plus, which differ from each other in the way the amount of the first loss account is determined, the options available for covering the participating financial institution's credit enhancement obligation, and the fee structure for the credit enhancement fees.

Under MPF Original, the first loss account accumulates over the life of the master commitment. Each month, the outstanding aggregate principal balance of the loans at monthend is multiplied by an agreed-upon percentage (typically 4 basis points per annum), and that amount is added to the first loss account. As credit and special hazard losses are realized that are not covered by the liquidation value of the real property or primary mortgage insurance, they are first charged to the Bank with a corresponding reduction of the first loss account for that master commitment up to the amount accumulated in the first loss account at that time. Over time, the first loss account may cover themeasures expected credit losses on mortgage loans on a master commitment, although losses that are greater than expected or that occur earlyloan-level basis, factoring in the life ofcredit enhancement structure at the master commitment could exceed the amount accumulated in the first loss account. In that case, the excess losses would be charged next to the member's credit enhancement to the extent available. For each master commitment, the Bank considers the credit performance, credit enhancement levels, and the nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) rating equivalent as determined under the MPF Program methodology, in the determination of its risk-based capital requirements, and the credit performance, collateral protection, and availability of credit enhancement in the evaluation of appropriate loan loss allowances.

level.
The aggregate first loss account for all participating financial institutions for MPF Original totaled $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

The participating financial institution’s credit enhancement obligation under MPF Original must be collateralized by the participating financial institution in the same way that advances from the Bank are collateralized, as described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysisfollowing table presents a rollforward of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Advances.”For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution a credit enhancement fee, typically 10 basis points per annum, calculated on the unpaid principal balance of the loans in the master commitment. A participating financial institution may elect to receive credit enhancement fees monthly over the life of the loans or in an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time the loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. In both cases, the Bank charges credit enhancement fees to interest income, which

65



effectively reduces the overall yield earned on the loans purchased by the Bank. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees that are paid monthly totaling $0.5 million in 2017, $0.2 million in 2016, and $0.1 million in 2015 for MPF Original loans.

Under MPF Plus, the first loss account is equal to a specified percentage of the scheduled principal balance of loans in the pool as of the sale date of each loan. The percentage of the first loss account was negotiated for each master commitment. The participating financial institution provides credit enhancement for loans sold to the Bank under MPF Plus by maintaining a supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) policy that equals its credit enhancement obligation. The amount of required credit enhancement is recalculated annually. Because the MPF Plus product provides that the requirement may only be reduced (and not increased), the SMI coverage could be reduced as a result of the annual recalculation of the required credit enhancement.

Typically, the amount of the first loss account is equal to the deductible on the SMI policy. However, the SMI policy does not cover special hazard losses or credit losses on loans with a loan-to-value ratio below a certain percentage (usually 50%). As a result, credit losses on loans not covered by the SMI policy and special hazard losses may reduce the amount of the first loss account without reducing the deductible on the SMI policy. If the deductible on the SMI policy has not been met and the pool incurs credit losses that exceed the amount of the first loss account, those losses will be allocated to the Bank until the SMI policy deductible has been met. Once the deductible has been met, the SMI policy will cover credit losses on loans covered by the policy up to the maximum loss coverage provided by the policy. If the SMI provider's claims-paying ability rating falls below a specified level, the participating financial institution has six months to either replace the SMI policy or assume the credit enhancement obligation and fully collateralize the obligation; otherwise the Bank may choose not to pay the participating financial institution its performance-based credit enhancement fee. Finally, the Bank will absorb credit losses that exceed the maximum loss coverage of the SMI policy (or the substitute credit enhancement provided by the participating financial institution), all credit losses on loans not covered by the policy, and all special hazard losses, if any.

Three of the six master commitments (totaling $0.3 billion) continue to rely on SMI coverage for a portion of their credit enhancement obligation, which is provided by two SMI companies and totals $9.4 million after the deductible. The claims-paying ability ratings of these two SMI companies are below the AA rating required for the program; one is rated BB+ and the other is rated BBB-. The participating financial institutions associated with the relevant master commitments have chosen to forego their performance-based credit enhancement fees rather than assume the credit enhancement obligation. The largest of the commitments (totaling$0.2 billion) did not achieve AA credit equivalency, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, solely because the SMI company was rated BB+.

At December 31, 2017, the deductibles under the SMI policies totaled approximately 35% of the participating financial institutions’ credit enhancement obligation on MPF Plus loans. At December 31, 2016, the deductibles under the SMI policies totaled approximately 35% of the participating financial institutions’ credit enhancement obligation on MPF Plus loans. None of the SMI was provided by participating financial institutions or their affiliates at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The first loss account for MPF Plus for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was as follows:

First Loss Account for MPF Plus
      
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$8
 $9
 $10
Losses incurred in excess of liquidation value of the real property securing the loan and primary mortgage insurance
 (1) (1)
Balance, end of the period$8
 $8
 $9


66



Under MPF Plus, the Bank pays the participating financial institution a credit enhancement fee that is divided into a fixed credit enhancement fee and a performance-based credit enhancement fee. The fixed credit enhancement fee is paid each month beginning with the month after each loan delivery. The performance-based credit enhancement fee accrues monthly beginning with the month after each loan delivery and is paid to the member beginning 12 months later. Performance-based credit enhancement fees payable to the member are reduced by an amount equal to loan losses, up to the full amount of the first loss account established for each master commitment. If losses up to the full amount of the first loss account, net of previously withheld performance-based credit enhancement fees, exceed the credit enhancement fee payable in any period, the excess will be carried forward and applied against future performance-based credit enhancement fees. Because loans in the MPF Plus program have experienced a high rate of voluntary prepayments, causing the current balance of each respective master commitment to be significantly reduced since purchase, it is possible that the remaining loans will not generate enough performance-based credit enhancement fees over the remaining life of each master commitment to enable the Bank to collect performance-based credit enhancement fees equal to the full amount of the first loss account established for each MPF Plus master commitment. The amount of performance-based credit enhancement fees expected to be accrued in the future is uncertain and highly dependent on the future rate of principal prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees totaling $0.2 million in 2017, $0.3 million in 2016, and $0.3 million in 2015 for MPF Plus loans. The Bank’s liability for performance-based credit enhancement fees for MPF Plus was de minimis at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The Bank provides for a loss allowance, net of the credit enhancement, for any impaired loans and for the estimates of other probable losses, and the Bank has policies and procedures in place to monitor the credit risk. The Bank bases the allowance for credit losses foron the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio on its estimate of probable credit losses in the portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank implemented the accounting requirements of regulatory Advisory Bulletin 2012-02. As a result, for any mortgage loans that are more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, this excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy, loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur. As a result of these charge-offs, the corresponding Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans, which had previously provided for most of these expected losses, was reduced accordingly.

Mortgage Loans Evaluated at the Individual Master Commitment Level – The credit risk analysis of all conventional MPF loans is performed at the individual master commitment level to determine the credit enhancements available to recover losses on MPF loans under each individual master commitment.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans – Certain conventional mortgage loans, primarily impaired mortgage loans that are considered collateral-dependent, may be specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The estimated credit losses on impaired collateral-dependent loans may be separately determined because sufficient information exists to make a reasonable estimate of the inherent loss on those loans on an individual loan basis. The Bank estimates the fair value of collateral using real estate broker price opinions or automated valuation models based on property characteristics as well as recent market sales and current listings. The resulting incurred loss, if any, is equal to the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans – The credit risk analysis of conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment considers loan pool-specific attribute data, applies estimated loss severities, and considers the associated credit enhancements to determine the Bank's best estimate of probable incurred losses. The analysis includes estimating projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of all available information, including prepayment speeds, default rates, and loss severity of the mortgage loans based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics; expected housing price changes; and interest rate assumptions. In performing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Bank develops its best estimate of the cash flows

67



expected to be collected using a third-party model to project prepayments, default rates, and loss severities based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the mortgage loans, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. The assumptions used as inputs to the model, including the forecast of future housing price changes, are consistent with assumptions used for the Bank's evaluation of its PLRMBS for OTTI.

The Bank performs periodic reviews of its mortgage loan portfolio to identify the probable credit losses in the portfolioyear ended December 31, 2021 and to determine the likelihood of collection on the loans in the portfolio. The overall allowance is determined by an analysis that includes consideration of observable data such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, collectability of credit enhancements from members or from mortgage insurers, and prevailing economic conditions, taking into account the credit enhancement provided by the member under the terms of each master commitment.

2020. The amounts of charge-offs and recoveries of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were de minimis during the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016. Net charge-offs of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were $2 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

The continued decline in the estimated allowance for credit losses during 2017 is primarily due to a decline in the balance of the seasoned portion of mortgage loans, originated between 2002 and 2006, as well as a decline in serious delinquencies in mortgage loans purchased subsequent to 2013 and continuing improvements in the economy and the housing market.

The allowance for credit losses and recorded investment by impairment methodology for individually and collectively evaluated impaired loans are as follows:

2020.
57
(In millions)2017
 2016
Allowance for credit losses, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$
 $
Total allowance for credit losses$
 $
Recorded investment, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$9
 $12
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,078
 818
Total recorded investment$2,087
 $830

The recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment are as follows:

 2017 2016
(In millions)Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
With no related allowance$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $
With an allowance
 
 
 
 
 
Total$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $

The average recorded investment on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

(In millions)2017
 2016
With no related allowance$10
 $12
With an allowance
 
Total$10
  $12

68




For the three MPF Plus master commitments that still rely on SMI for a portion of their credit enhancement obligation, the external ratings of the SMI providers have declined since the loans were purchased. Because the relevant participating financial institutions have elected not to assume the credit enhancement obligations as their own, the Bank has discontinued paying the associated performance-based credit enhancement fees, in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements. Formerly, upon a realized loss, the Bank would have withheld credit enhancement fees up to the amount of the SMI deductible to offset the loss. Because these fees are no longer owed to the participating financial institutions, they cannot be withheld to offset a loss. Instead, the Bank is accounting for the performance-based credit enhancement fees as income and has now begun to directly recognize the potential loan losses in the related loan loss allowance account.

(in millions)20212020
Balance, beginning of the period$$— 
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change— 
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses(3)
Balance, end of the period$$
For more information on how the Bank determines its estimated allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses – Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 106AllowanceMortgage Loans Held for Credit Losses.Portfolio.

The following tables present the payment status for mortgage loans and other delinquency statistics for the Bank’s mortgage loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
A mortgage
December 31, 2021
Origination Year
Payment Status2017 to 2021Prior to 2017
Amortized Cost(1)
30 – 59 days delinquent$$$
60 – 89 days delinquent
90 days or more delinquent26 10 36 
Total past due34 14 48 
Total current loans729 204 933 
Total MPF$763 $218 $981 
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$
Nonaccrual loans(3)
$36 
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(4)
3.64 %
December 31, 2020
Origination Year
Payment Status2016 to 2020Prior to 2016
Amortized Cost(1)
30 – 59 days delinquent$20 $$22 
60 – 89 days delinquent
90 days or more delinquent95 104 
Total past due120 13 133 
Total current loans1,628 178 1,806 
Total MPF(5)
$1,748 $191 $1,939 
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$
Nonaccrual loans(3)
$104 
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(4)
5.34 %
(1)    The amortized cost in a loan is consideredthe unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs.
(2)    Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to be impaired when itforeclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)    At December 31, 2021 and 2020, $21 and $62, respectively, of mortgage loans on nonaccrual status did not have an associated allowance for credit losses because these loans were either previously charged off to the expected recoverable value or the fair value of the underlying collateral, including any credit enhancements, is reportedgreater than the amortized cost of the loans.
(4)    Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, thatin the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according toprocess of foreclosure as a percentage of the contractual termsrecorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.
(5)    The amortized costs of the mortgage loan agreement.

loans by origination year in the 2016 to 2020 column and prior to 2016 column that were previously disclosed in the “Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio” note were incorrectly presented as of December 31, 2020, in the Bank’s 2020 Form 10-K. The following table presents information on delinquentamortized costs of the mortgage loans by origination year as of December 31, 20172020, have been corrected. The total amortized costs presented for each period were properly disclosed. These revisions had no effect on the Bank’s total assets, net interest income, or net income for all affected periods.
58

For 2021 and 2016.

Mortgage Loan Delinquencies
    
 2017

2016
(Dollars in millions)
Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

30 – 59 days delinquent$8
 $7
60 – 89 days delinquent2
 3
90 days or more delinquent12
 15
Total past due22
 25
Total current loans2,065
 805
Total mortgage loans$2,087
 $830
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$3
 $5
Nonaccrual loans$12
 $15
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(3)
0.59% 1.79%

(1)The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(2)Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure as a percentage of the recorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.

For 2017, 2016, and 2015,2020, the interest on nonaccrual loans that was contractually due and recognized in income was as follows:


69



Interest on Nonaccrual Loans
      
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
Interest contractually due on nonaccrual loans during the period$1
 $1
 $1
Interest recognized in income for nonaccrual loans during the period
 
 
Shortfall$1
 $1
 $1

immaterial. Delinquencies amounted to 1.11%4.84% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio as of December 31, 2017,2021, and 3.12%6.84% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio as of December 31, 2016. 2020.
The decline in the delinquency percentage was due to the purchase of new loans in 2017 as well as declining delinquencies during 2017. The weighted average age offollowing table presents risk elements and credit ratios for the Bank’s MPF portfolio was 36 months as of mortgage loans at December 31, 2017,2021 and 87 months as2020. The amount of December 31, 2016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficultiescharge-offs and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. An MPF loan considered a TDR is individually evaluated for impairment when determining its relatedrecoveries of allowance for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash flow shortfalls incurred as oflosses on the reporting date as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates, if applicable.

The Bank’s TDRs of MPF loans primarily involve modifying the borrower's monthly payment for a period of up to 36 months to reflect a housing expense ratio that is no more than 31% of the borrower's qualifying monthly income. The outstanding principal balance is re-amortized to reflect a principal and interest payment for a term not to exceed 40 years from the original note date and a housing expense ratio not to exceed 31%. This would result in a balloon payment at the original maturity date of themortgage loan because the maturity date and number of remaining monthly payments are not adjusted. If the 31% ratio is still not achieved through re-amortization, the interest rate is reduced in 0.125% increments below the original note rate, to a floor rate of 3%, resulting in reduced principal and interest payments,portfolio were de minimis for the temporary payment modification period of up to 36 months, until the 31% housing expense ratio is met.

The recorded investment of the Bank’s nonperforming MPFloans classified as TDRs totaled $3 million as ofyears ended December 31, 2017,2021 and $3 million as of December 31, 2016. During 2017 and 2016, the difference between the pre- and post-modification recorded investment in TDRs that occurred during the year was de minimis. None of the MPF loans classified as TDRs within the previous 12 months experienced a payment default.2020.

Unpaid Principal Balance20212020
Average loans outstanding during the period$1,329 $2,749 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio$954 $1,906 
Nonaccrual loans$35 $102 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans held for portfolio$$
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period0.06 %0.02 %
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to mortgage loans held for portfolio0.10 %0.21 %
Ratio of nonaccrual loans to mortgage loans held for portfolio3.62 %5.33 %
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans2.64 %4.02 %

At December 31, 2017, the Bank’s other assets included $1 million of real estate owned (REO) resulting from the foreclosure of 11 mortgage loans held by the Bank. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s other assets included $1 million of REO resulting from the foreclosure of 12 mortgage loans held by the Bank.

Investments. The Bank has adopted credit policies and exposure limits for investments that promote risk limitation, diversification, and liquidity. These policies determine eligible counterparties and restrict the amounts and terms of the Bank’s investments with any given counterparty according to the Bank’s own capital position as well as the capital and creditworthiness of the counterparty.

The Bank monitors its investments for substantive changes in relevant market conditions and any declines in fair value. For securities in an unrealized loss position because of factors other than movements in interest rates, such as widening of mortgage asset spreads, the Bank considers whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security by comparing the best estimateexpectations of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the Bank’s best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the difference is considered the credit loss.

When the fair value of an individual investment security falls below its amortized cost, the Bank evaluates whether an allowance for credit losses is necessary on the decline is other than temporary.security. The Bank recognizes an OTTIallowance for credit losses when it determines that it will be unable to

70



recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security and the fair value of the investment security is less than its amortized cost. The Bank considers its intent to hold the security and whether it is more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining cost basis, and other factors. The Bank generally views changes in the fair value of the securities caused by movements in interest rates to be temporary.

The following tables presenttable presents the Bank’s investment credit exposure at the dates indicated,December 31, 2021, based on the lowest of the long-term credit ratings provided by Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch Ratings (Fitch) ratings.

59
Investment Credit Exposure
              
(In millions)             
December 31, 2017             
  Carrying Value
 
Credit Rating(1)
    
Investment TypeAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Non-MBS             
Certificates of deposit$
 $
 $500
 $
 $
 $
 $500
Housing finance agency bonds:             
CalHFA bonds
 
 187
 
 
 
 187
GSEs:             
FFCB bonds
 1,158
 
 
 
 
 1,158
Total non-MBS
 1,158
 687
 
 
 
 1,845
MBS:             
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:             
Ginnie Mae
 757
 
 
 
 
 757
GSEs – single-family:             
Freddie Mac
 2,039
 
 
 
 
 2,039
Fannie Mae(2)

 3,588
 7
 
 5
 
 3,600
Subtotal
 5,627
 7
 
 5
 
 5,639
GSEs – multifamily:             
Freddie Mac
 4,651
 
 
 
 
 4,651
Fannie Mae
 2,131
 
 
 
 
 2,131
Subtotal

6,782









6,782
Total GSEs
 12,409
 7
 
 5
 
 12,421
PLRMBS:             
Prime
 
 12
 200
 642
 31
 885
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 834
 
 834
Alt-A, other2
 13
 12
 57
 2,549
 302
 2,935
Total PLRMBS2
 13
 24
 257
 4,025
 333
 4,654
Total MBS2
 13,179
 31
 257
 4,030
 333
 17,832
Total securities2
 14,337
 718
 257
 4,030
 333
 19,677
Interest-bearing deposits
 40
 1,075
 
 
 
 1,115
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 11,750
 
 
 
 
 11,750
Federal funds sold(3)

 5,283
 5,745
 
 
 
 11,028
Total investments$2
 $31,410
 $7,538
 $257
 $4,030
 $333
 $43,570



71



Investment Credit Exposure
(In millions)
December 31, 2021
Carrying Value
 
Credit Rating(1)
Investment TypeAAAAAABBBBelow Investment GradeUnratedTotal
U.S. obligations – Treasury securities$— $754 $— $— $— $— $754 
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:
Ginnie Mae— 115 — — — — 115 
GSEs – single-family:
Freddie Mac— 207 — — — — 207 
Fannie Mae(2)
793 — — 804 
Subtotal1,000 — — 1,011 
GSEs – multifamily:
Freddie Mac— 1,988 — — — — 1,988 
Fannie Mae— 8,102 — — — — 8,102 
Subtotal— 10,090 — — — — 10,090 
Total GSEs11,090 — — 11,101 
PLRMBS:
Prime— 16 21 37 119 92 285 
Alt-A— 20 34 36 952 498 1,540 
Total PLRMBS— 36 55 73 1,071 590 1,825 
Total MBS11,241 59 73 1,073 590 13,041 
Total securities11,995 59 73 1,073 590 13,795 
Interest-bearing deposits— — 1,125 — — — 1,125 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell— 14,500 1,000 — — — 15,500 
Federal funds sold— 1,400 3,948 — — — 5,348 
Total investments$$27,895 $6,132 $73 $1,073 $590 $35,768 
(1)Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.
(In millions)             
December 31, 2016             
  Carrying Value
 
Credit Rating(1)
   
Investment TypeAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Non-MBS             
Certificates of deposit$
 $600
 $750
 $
 $
 $
 $1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:            
CalHFA bonds
 
 225
 
 
 
 225
GSEs:             
FFCB bonds
 2,058
 
 
 
 
 2,058
Total non-MBS
 2,658
 975
 
 
 
 3,633
MBS:             
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:             
Ginnie Mae
 959
 
 
 
 
 959
GSEs – single-family:             
Freddie Mac
 2,793
 
 
 
 
 2,793
Fannie Mae(2)

 5,020
 10
 
 7
 
 5,037
Subtotal
 7,813
 10
 
 7
 
 7,830
GSEs – multifamily:             
Freddie Mac
 1,556
 
 
 
 
 1,556
Fannie Mae
 1,058
 
 
 
 
 1,058
Subtotal
 2,614
 
 
 
 
 2,614
Total GSEs
 10,427
 10
 
 7
 
 10,444
PLRMBS:             
Prime
 1
 1
 295
 842
 2
 1,141
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 897
 
 897
Alt-A, other5
 15
 17
 128
 3,440
 3
 3,608
Total PLRMBS5
 16
 18
 423
 5,179
 5
 5,646
Total MBS5
 11,402
 28
 423
 5,186
 5
 17,049
Total securities5
 14,060
 1,003
 423
 5,186
 5
 20,682
Interest-bearing deposits
 
 590
 
 
 
 590
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 15,500
 
 
 
 
 15,500
Federal funds sold(3)

 1,576
 2,585
 53
 
 
 4,214
Total investments$5
 $31,136
 $4,178
 $476
 $5,186
 $5
 $40,986

(1)Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.
(2)The Bank has one security guaranteed by Fannie Mae but rated D by S&P because of extraordinary expenses incurred during bankruptcy of the security's sponsor.
(3)Includes $225 million and $130 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, in Federal funds sold to a member counterparty determined by the Bank to have an internal credit rating equivalent to an AA rating.

(2)The Bank has one security guaranteed by Fannie Mae but rated BB at December 31, 2021, by S&P because of extraordinary expenses incurred during bankruptcy of the security's sponsor.
For all securities in its AFS and HTM portfolios, for Federal funds sold, and for securities purchased under agreements to resell, the Bank does not intend to sell any security and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

The Bank invests in short-term unsecured interest-bearing deposits, short-term unsecured Federal funds sold, and securities purchased under agreements to resell and negotiable certificates of deposit with member and nonmember counterparties, all of which are highly rated.

Bank policies set forth the creditworthiness requirements for member and nonmember counterparties for unsecured credit. All Federal funds counterparties (members and nonmembers) must be federally insured financial institutions or domestic branches of foreign commercial banks. The general unsecured credit policy limits are as follows:

7260



December 31, 2021
Unsecured Credit Policy Limits
Unsecured Credit Limit Amount
(Lower of Percentage of Bank Capital
or Percentage of Counterparty Capital)
Finance Agency
Credit Rating(1)
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Outstanding Term(2)
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Total Outstanding
Maximum
Investment
Term (Months)
Member counterpartyFHFA 115 %30 %
FHFA 214 28 
FHFA 318 
FHFA 4— Overnight
Nonmember counterpartyFHFA 115 30 
FHFA 214 28 
FHFA 318 
Unsecured Credit Policy Limits
        
   
Unsecured Credit Limit Amount
(Lower of Percentage of Bank Capital
or Percentage of Counterparty Capital)
  
 
Long-Term
Credit Rating(1)
 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Outstanding Term(2)

 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Total Outstanding

 
Maximum
Investment
Term (Months)

Member counterpartyAAA 15% 30% 3
 AA 14
 28
 3
 A 9
 18
 3
 BBB 
 6
 Overnight
Nonmember counterpartyAAA 15
 30
 3
 AA 14
 28
 3
 A 9
 18
 3

(1) Long-term creditFinance Agency ratings are based on the lowest of Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. The Bank also uses other similar standards, such as the
Bank’smapped to equivalent internal credit quality ratings on a rating scale of FHFA 1 through FHFA 7, reflecting progressively lower credit quality. The Bank uses internal credit quality ratings to determine maximum limits to members and nonmembers. If a member is not rated by an NRSRO, theThe Bank will
determine the applicablecounterparty’s credit rating by using the Bank’sprimary sources such as external ratings, other credit quality rating and may provide overnight unsecured credit to that member.fixed income research, company reports, and market-based indications.
(2)Term limit applies to unsecured extensions of credit excluding Federal funds transactions with a maturity of one day or less and Federal funds subject to a
continuing contract.

The Bank’s unsecured investment credit limits and terms for member counterparties may be less restrictive than for nonmember counterparties because the Bank has access to more information about members to assist in evaluating the member counterparty credit risk.

The Bank actively monitors its credit exposures and the credit quality of its counterparties, including an assessment of each counterparty’s financial performance, capital adequacy, likelihood of parental or sovereign support, and the current market perceptions of the counterparties. The Bank may also consider general macroeconomic and market conditions and political stability when establishing limits on unsecured investments with U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. As a result of deteriorating financial condition or concerns about adverse economic or market developments, the Bank may reduce limits or terms on unsecured investments or suspend a counterparty.

Finance Agency regulations limit the amount of unsecured credit that an individual FHLBank may extend to a single counterparty. This limit is calculated with reference to a percentage of either the FHLBank’s or the counterparty’s capital and to the counterparty’s overall credit rating. Under these regulations, the lesser of the FHLBank’s total regulatory capital or the counterparty’s Tier 1 capital is multiplied by a percentage specified in the regulation. The percentages used to determine the maximum amount of term extensions of unsecured credit range from 1% to 15%, depending on the counterparty’s overall credit rating. Term extensions of unsecured credit include on-balance sheet transactions, off-balance sheet commitments, and derivative transactions, but exclude overnight Federal funds sales, even if subject to a continuing contract. (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Derivative Counterparties” for additional information related to derivatives exposure.)

Finance Agency regulations also permit the FHLBanks to extend additional unsecured credit to the same single counterparty for overnight sales of Federal funds, even if subject to a continuing contract. However, an FHLBank’s total unsecured credit to a single counterparty (total term plus additional overnight Federal funds unsecured credit) may not exceed twice the regulatory limit for term exposures (2% to 30% of the lesser of the FHLBank’s total regulatory capital or the counterparty’s Tier 1 capital, based on the counterparty’s overall credit rating). In addition, the FHLBanks are prohibited by Finance Agency regulation from investing in financial instruments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.

Under Finance Agency regulations, the total amount of unsecured credit that an FHLBank may extend to a group of affiliated counterparties for term extensions of unsecured credit and overnight Federal funds sales, combined, may

73



not exceed 30% of the FHLBank’s total capital. These limits on affiliated counterparty groups are in addition to the limits on extensions of unsecured credit applicable to any single counterparty within the affiliated group.

The following table presents the unsecured credit exposure with counterparties by investment type at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.
61

Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Investment TypeUnsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Investment TypeUnsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Investment Type
   
Carrying Value(1)

Carrying Value(1)
(In millions)2017
 2016
(In millions)20212020
Interest-bearing deposits$1,115
 $590
Interest-bearing deposits$1,125 $1,077 
Certificates of deposit500
 1,350
Federal funds sold11,028
 4,214
Federal funds sold5,348 1,880 
Total$12,643
 $6,154
Total$6,473 $2,957 

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(1)Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The following table presents the credit ratings of the unsecured investment credit exposures presented by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty’s parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks, based on the lowest of the credit ratings provided by Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. This table does not reflect the foreign sovereign government’s credit rating. At December 31, 2017, 42% of the carrying value of unsecured investments held by the Bank were rated AA, and 76%2021, 83% of the Bank’s total unsecured investments were to U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.

Ratings of Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Domicile of Counterparty
      
(In millions)     
December 31, 2017     
  
Carrying Value(1)
 
Credit Rating(2)
 
Domicile of CounterpartyAA
 A
 Total
Domestic(3)
$1,298
 $1,763
 $3,061
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks
 
 
Total domestic and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks1,298
 1,763
 3,061
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:     
Australia1,975
 
 1,975
Austria
 650
 650
Canada550
 1,350
 1,900
France
 100
 100
Japan
 1,608
 1,608
Netherlands
 804
 804
Norway
 345
 345
Singapore500
 
 500
Sweden1,000
 
 1,000
Switzerland
 500
 500
United Kingdom
 200
 200
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks4,025
 5,557
 9,582
Total unsecured credit exposure$5,323
 $7,320
 $12,643

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2017.
(2)
Does not reflect changes in ratings, outlook, or watch status occurring after December 31, 2017. These ratings represent the lowest rating available for each unsecured investment owned by the Bank, based on the ratings provided by Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. The Bank’s internal rating may differ from this rating.

74



(3)Includes $225 million at December 31, 2017, in Federal funds sold to a member counterparty determined by the Bank to have an internal credit rating equivalent to an AA rating.

The following table presents the contractual maturity At December 31, 2021, all of the Bank’s unsecured investment credit exposure by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty’s parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. At December 31, 2017, 76% of the carrying value of unsecured investments held by the Bank had overnight maturities.
Ratings of Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Domicile of Counterparty
(In millions)
December 31, 2021
Carrying Value(1)
 
Credit Rating(2)
Domicile of CounterpartyAAATotal
Domestic$— $1,125 $1,125 
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Australia— 1,430 1,430 
Canada1,400 1,400 2,800 
Germany— 400 400 
Netherlands— 718 718 
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks1,400 3,948 5,348 
Total unsecured credit exposure$1,400 $5,073 $6,473 
Contractual Maturity of Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Domicile of Counterparty
        
(In millions)       
December 31, 2017       
  
Carrying Value(1)
Domicile of CounterpartyOvernight
 Due 2 Days Through 30 Days
 Due 31 Days Through 90 Days
 Total
Domestic$3,061
 $
 $
 $3,061
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks
 
 
 
Total domestic and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks3,061
 
 
 3,061
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:       
Australia1,225
 300
 450
 1,975
Austria400
 
 250
 650
Canada1,400
 
 500
 1,900
France100
 
 
 100
Japan1,108
 
 500
 1,608
Netherlands804
 
 
 804
Norway345
 
 
 345
Singapore
 
 500
 500
Sweden1,000
 
 
 1,000
Switzerland
 
 500
 500
United Kingdom200
 
 
 200
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks6,582
 300
 2,700
 9,582
Total unsecured credit exposure$9,643
 $300
 $2,700
 $12,643
(1)Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2021.

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2017.

The Bank’s investments may also include housing finance agency bonds issued by housing finance agencies located(2)Does not reflect changes in Arizona, California, and Nevada,ratings, outlook, or watch status occurring after December 31, 2021. These ratings represent the three states that make up the Bank’s district. These bonds are federally taxable mortgage revenue bonds, collateralized by pools of first lien residential mortgage loans and credit-enhanced by bond insurance. The bonds heldlowest rating available for each unsecured investment owned by the Bank, are issuedbased on the ratings provided by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) and insured by either National Public Financial Guarantee (formerly MBIA Insurance Corporation), or Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation (formerly Financial Security Assurance Incorporated). At December 31, 2017, all of the bonds were rated at least A by Fitch, Moody’s, or S&P.

For the&P. The Bank’s investments in housing finance agency bonds, which were issued by CalHFA, the gross unrealized losses were mainly due to an illiquid market, credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investments to be valued at a discount to their acquisition cost. The Bank independently modeled cash flows for the underlying collateral, using assumptions for default rates and loss severity that a market participant would deem reasonable, and concluded that the available credit support within the CalHFA structure more than offset the projected underlying collateral losses. The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on the CalHFA bonds are temporary because the underlying collateral and credit enhancements were sufficient to protect the Bankinternal rating may differ from losses. As a

75



result, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. If conditions in the housing and mortgage markets and general business and economic conditions deteriorate, the fair value of the CalHFA bonds may decline further and the Bank may experience OTTI in future periods.

this rating.
The Bank’s MBS investments include PLRMBS, all of which were AAA-rated at the time of purchase, and
agency residential MBS, which are backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. Some of the PLRMBS were issued by and/or purchased from members, former members, or their affiliates. The Bank has investment credit limits and terms for these investments that do not differ for members and nonmembers. Regulatory policy limits total MBS investments, including unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and net charge-offs, to three times the Bank’s regulatory capital at the time of purchase. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank’s MBS portfolio was 257%206% of Bank regulatory capital (as determined in accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks). The Bank has not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of 2008.

The Bank executes all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. When the Bank executes non-MBS investments with members, the Bank may give consideration to their secured credit availability and the Bank’s advances price levels.

At December 31, 2017,2021, PLRMBS representing 20%11% of the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS portfolio were labeled Alt-A by the issuer. These PLRMBS are generally collateralized by mortgage loans that are considered less risky than subprime loans but more risky than prime loans. These loans are generally made to borrowers with credit
62

scores that are high enough to qualify for a prime mortgage loan, but the loans may not meet standard underwriting guidelines for documentation requirements, property type, or loan-to-value ratios.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank’s investment in MBS had gross unrealized losses totaling $77$8 million,, most $6 million of which were related to PLRMBS. These gross unrealized losses were primarily due to illiquidity in the MBS market and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their amortized cost.

For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Bank determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017,2021, all of the gross unrealized losses on its agency MBS are temporary.

To assess whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its PLRMBS, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for all of its PLRMBS as of December 31, 2017, using two third-party models. The FHLBanks’ OTTI Committee developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 5.0% to an increase of 12.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2017. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from an increase of 2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.

The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined reflects a best-estimate scenario and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

In addition to evaluating its PLRMBS under a base case (or best estimate) scenario, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for each of these securities under a more adverse housing price scenario. This more adverse scenario was primarily based on a short-term housing price forecast that was five percentage points below the base case forecast, followed by a recovery path with annual rates of housing price growth that were 33.0% lower than the base case.

The following table shows the base case scenario and what the credit-related OTTI loss would have been under the more adverse housing price scenario at December 31, 2017:

76



OTTI Analysis Under Base Case and Adverse Case Scenarios
            
 Housing Price Scenario
 Base Case Adverse Case
(Dollars in millions)
Number of
Securities

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Number of
Securities

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:           
Alt-A, other5
 $144
 $(1) 8
 $186
 $(2)
Total5
 $144
 $(1) 8
 $186
 $(2)

(1)
Amounts are for the three months ended December 31, 2017.

For more information on the Bank’s OTTI analysis and reviews, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

The following table presents the ratings of the Bank’s PLRMBS as of December 31, 2017, by collateral type at origination and by year of securitization.

Unpaid Principal Balance of PLRMBS by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
              
(In millions)             
December 31, 2017            
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 
Credit Rating(1) 
   
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Prime             
2008$
 $
 $
 $
 $110
 $
 $110
2007
 
 
 
 244
 34
 278
2006
 
 
 
 26
 
 26
2005
 
 
 14
 34
 
 48
2004 and earlier
 
 12
 186
 264
 2
 464
Total Prime
 
 12
 200
 678
 36
 926
Alt-A, option ARM             
2007
 
 
 
 686
 
 686
2006
 
 
 
 130
 
 130
2005
 
 
 
 136
 
 136
Total Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 952
 
 952
Alt-A, other             
2008
 
 
 
 76
 
 76
2007
 
 
 
 740
 196
 936
2006
 
 
 
 282
 101
 383
2005
 2
 
 
 1,421
 48
 1,471
2004 and earlier2
 12
 12
 56
 281
 6
 369
Total Alt-A, other2
 14
 12
 56
 2,800
 351
 3,235
Total par value$2
 $14
 $24
 $256
 $4,430
 $387
 $5,113

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lowest of Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.

77



The following table presents the ratings of the Bank’s other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS at December 31, 2017, by collateral type at origination and by year of securitization.
Unpaid Principal Balance of Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS
by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
        
(In millions)       
December 31, 2017       
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 
Credit Rating(1)
    
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationAA
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Prime       
2008$
 $102
 $
 $102
2007
 210
 34
 244
2006
 10
 
 10
2005
 16
 
 16
2004 and earlier
 33
 
 33
Total Prime
 371
 34
 405
Alt-A, option ARM       
2007
 687
 
 687
2006
 130
 
 130
2005
 136
 
 136
Total Alt-A, option ARM
 953
 
 953
Alt-A, other       
2008
 76
 
 76
2007
 734
 196
 930
2006
 282
 101
 383
2005
 1,421
 48
 1,469
2004 and earlier3
 126
 4
 133
Total Alt-A, other3
 2,639
 349
 2,991
Total par value$3
 $3,963
 $383
 $4,349

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lowest of Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.

For the Bank’s PLRMBS, the following table shows the amortized cost, estimated fair value, credit- and non-credit-related OTTI, performance of the underlying collateral based on the classification at the time of origination, and credit enhancement statistics by type of collateral and year of securitization. Credit enhancement is defined as the percentage of subordinated tranches and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security, expressed as a percentage of the underlying collateral balance. The credit enhancement figures include the additional credit enhancement required by the Bank (above the amounts required for an AAA rating by the credit rating agencies) for selected securities starting in late 2004, and for all securities starting in late 2005. The calculated weighted averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS in each category shown. The classification (prime or Alt-A) is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the security, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.


78



PLRMBS Credit Characteristics
                  
(Dollars in millions)                 
December 31, 2017               
             
Underlying Collateral Performance and
Credit Enhancement Statistics
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of Securitization
Amortized
Cost

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses(2)

 
Estimated
Fair
Value

 
Total
OTTI(1)

 
Non-
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Weighted
Average
60+ Days
Collateral
Delinquency
Rate

 
Original
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

 
Current
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

Prime                 
2008$94
 $
 $106
 $
 $
 $
 13.06% 30.00% 10.32%
2007230
 (3) 239
 (1) 
 (1) 14.27
 22.91
 2.18
200623
 
 25
 
 
 
 13.08
 12.28
 4.36
200546
 
 48
 
 
 
 10.39
 11.88
 15.64
2004 and earlier463
 (3) 466
 
 
 
 6.91
 4.50
 13.80
Total Prime856
 (6) 884
 (1) 
 (1) 10.20
 13.64
 9.73
Alt-A, option ARM                 
2007566
 (9) 621
 
 
 
 19.98
 44.22
 13.52
200698
 
 119
 
 
 
 16.38
 44.91
 3.85
200550
 (1) 94
 
 
 
 16.28
 22.82
 5.12
Total Alt-A, option ARM714
 (10) 834
 
 
 
 18.96
 41.26
 11.00
Alt-A, other                 
200873
 
 74
 
 
 
 6.56
 31.80
 21.88
2007793
 (14) 834
 (8) (3) (11) 18.35
 26.95
 8.63
2006273
 
 335
 
 
 
 17.67
 18.44
 0.58
20051,249
 (15) 1,330
 (1) (3) (4) 12.14
 14.44
 4.03
2004 and earlier365
 (2) 371
 
 
 
 9.88
 8.27
 19.13
Total Alt-A, other2,753
 (31) 2,944
 (9) (6) (15) 14.20
 18.24
 7.09
Total$4,323
 $(47) $4,662
 $(10) $(6) $(16) 14.36% 21.70% 8.30%

(1)Amounts are for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(2) Represents total gross unrealized losses, including non-credit-related other-than-temporary impairment recognized in AOCI. The unpaid principal
balance of Prime, Alt-A, option ARM, and Alt-A, other in a gross unrealized loss position was $221 million, $176 million, and $643 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017, and the amortized cost of Prime, Alt-A, option ARM, and Alt-A, other in a gross unrealized loss position was $221 million, $154 million, and $589 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017.

The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used to determine potential OTTI credit losses in the Bank’s PLRMBS portfolio at December 31, 2017.


79



Significant Inputs to OTTI Credit Analysis for All PLRMBS
        
December 31, 2017       
 Significant Inputs Current
 Prepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit Enhancement
Year of SecuritizationWeighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average %
Prime       
200815.9 9.4 32.4 15.1
200712.3 3.1 20.1 8.8
200613.2 3.0 22.4 6.8
200519.6 4.6 19.7 12.8
2004 and earlier19.8 3.0 21.2 12.9
Total Prime18.1 4.8 24.2 13.1
Alt-A, option ARM       
20078.4 33.5 42.1 13.5
20067.7 34.8 37.5 3.9
20058.6 23.9 35.2 5.1
Total Alt-A, option ARM8.3 32.3 40.5 11.0
Alt-A, other       
200712.4 22.7 38.6 4.2
200611.1 24.1 38.0 7.2
200514.6 18.5 34.7 4.3
2004 and earlier18.1 10.2 30.6 19.5
Total Alt-A, other13.8 19.7 35.8 6.6
Total13.3 20.0 35.2 8.3

Credit enhancement is defined as the subordinated tranches and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will generally absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security, expressed as a percentage of the underlying collateral balance. The calculated averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS investments in each category shown. The classification (prime or Alt-A) is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the security, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.

The following table presents the fair value of the Bank’s PLRMBS as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance by collateral type at origination and year of securitization.


80



Fair Value of PLRMBS as a Percentage of Unpaid Principal Balance by Year of Securitization
          
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationDecember 31,
2017

 September 30,
2017

 June 30,
2017

 March 31,
2017

 December 31,
2016

Prime         
200896.89% 96.60% 92.68% 92.93% 92.87%
200786.40
 86.17
 83.80
 84.87
 83.93
200693.86
 93.98
 93.21
 92.25
 92.38
2005100.58
 100.02
 99.55
 99.44
 98.97
2004 and earlier100.47
 100.21
 99.70
 99.09
 98.68
Weighted average of all Prime95.65
 95.44
 94.14
 94.15
 93.71
Alt-A, option ARM         
200790.43
 90.00
 87.34
 83.66
 83.05
200691.66
 89.62
 86.82
 83.04
 80.76
200568.99
 65.67
 62.10
 57.79
 57.58
Weighted average of all Alt-A, option ARM87.53
 86.46
 83.66
 79.82
 79.05
Alt-A, other         
200897.22
 96.70
 94.73
 93.62
 93.31
200789.07
 88.80
 87.38
 86.49
 85.88
200687.40
 87.02
 85.55
 83.63
 82.57
200590.44
 90.35
 88.96
 87.31
 87.11
2004 and earlier100.47
 100.21
 99.54
 99.10
 98.51
Weighted average of all Alt-A, other90.98
 90.80
 89.60
 88.33
 87.86
Weighted average of all PLRMBS91.18% 90.84% 89.36% 87.89% 87.40%

The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, the gross unrealized losses on the PLRMBS that have not had an OTTI loss are primarily due to illiquidity in the PLRMBS market and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their amortized cost. The Bank does not intend to sell these securities, it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, and the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on these securities are temporary. The Bank will continue to monitor and analyze the performance of these securities to assess the likelihood of the recovery of the entire amortized cost basis of these securities as of each balance sheet date.

If conditions in the housing and mortgage markets and general business and economic conditions deteriorate, the fair value of MBS may decline further, and the Bank may experience OTTI ofcredit losses on additional PLRMBS in future periods, as well as further impairment of PLRMBS that were identified as other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017.prior to January 1, 2020. Additional future credit-related OTTIcredit losses could adversely affect the Bank’s earnings and retained earnings and its ability to pay dividends and repurchase capital stock. The Bank cannot predict whether it will be required to record additional credit-related OTTIan allowance for credit losses on its PLRMBS in the future.

Derivative Counterparties. The Bank has alsoexposure to investment securities with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. The following tables present the unpaid principal balance of adjustable rate investment securities by interest rate index and the unpaid principal balance of LIBOR-indexed investments for LIBOR tenors that cease or will no longer be representative immediately after June 30, 2023, by redemption term at December 31, 2021 and 2020. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” for more information on the LIBOR transition and on SOFR as an alternative market benchmark.
Adjustable Rate Investment Securities by Interest Rate Index
(In millions)MBS
Interest Rate IndexDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
LIBOR(1)
$4,110 $5,744 
Constant maturity Treasury64 101 
Other— 
Total adjustable rate investment securities(2)
$4,174 $5,846 
LIBOR-Indexed Investment Securities by Redemption Term
(In millions)MBS
Redemption TermDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Due in 2022$— $
Due through June 30, 202312 98 
Due thereafter(2)
4,098 5,645 
Total LIBOR-Indexed investment securities$4,110 $5,744 
(1)Certain MBS with multiple indices where LIBOR is the majority index are included in this amount.
(2)For more information on the Bank’s Transition Plan, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition.”

Derivative Counterparties. The Bank has adopted credit policies and exposure limits for uncleared derivatives counterparty credit exposure. Over-the-counter derivativesInterest rate exchange agreements may be either entered into directly withuncleared or cleared at a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or executed either with an executing dealer or on a swap execution facility and then cleared through a futures commission merchant (clearing agent) with a derivatives clearing organization (cleared derivatives).clearinghouse.

Uncleared Derivatives. Derivatives –The Bank selects only highly rated derivative dealers and major banks (derivative dealer counterparties) that meet the Bank’s eligibility criteria to act as counterparties for its uncleared derivative activities.
63

In addition, for all uncleared derivative transactions, the Bank has entered into master netting agreements and bilateral credit support agreements with all activeits derivative dealer counterparties that provide for delivery of

81



collateral at specified levels margin to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. Under these policies and agreements, the amount of unsecured credit exposure to an individual derivative dealer counterparty is set at zero (subject to a minimum transfer amount). All credit exposure from derivative transactions entered into by the Bank with member counterparties that are not derivative dealers (including interest rate swaps, caps, and floors), for which the Bank serves as an intermediary, must be fully secured by eligible collateral, and all such derivative transactions are subject to both the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement and a master netting agreement.

The Bank is subject to the risk of potential nonperformance by the counterparties toits counterparty in a derivative agreements.transaction. A counterparty generally must deliver collateralor return margin to the Bank if the total market value of the Bank’sunsecured exposure to that counterparty rises above a specific trigger point. Currently, all ofexceeds the Bank’s active uncleared derivative counterparties have a zero threshold.minimum transfer amount. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, the Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its uncleared derivative transactions with counterparties as of December 31, 2017.2021.

Cleared Derivatives. TheDerivatives – In a cleared derivatives transaction, the Bank is subject to nonperformance by the derivativesclearinghouse and its futures commission merchant or clearing organizations (clearinghouses) and clearing agents.agent. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through thea clearing agent to the clearinghouse exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event thatif the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. However, theThe use of cleared derivatives mitigates the Bank’sa clearinghouse, or central counterparty, lowers overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterpartiesit employs standard valuation and initial and variation margin processes and is specifically designed to withstand remote but plausible counterparty default credit events. Variation margin is posted dailyor collected for changes in the value of the portfolio, and initial margin is posted for changes in risk profile of the portfolio. Because of an increase in market values of cleared derivatives throughduring 2021, there was an increase in variation margin collected on cleared derivatives that resulted in an increase in net cash provided by operating activities reported on the Statements of Cash Flows. Because of a clearing agent.decline in market values of cleared derivatives during 2020, there was an increase in variation margin posted on cleared derivatives that resulted in an increase in net cash used in operating activities reported on the Statements of Cash Flows. The Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its cleared derivatives as of December 31, 2017.

The following table presents the Bank’s credit exposure to its derivative dealer counterparties at the dates indicated.
Credit Exposure to Derivative Dealer Counterparties
          
(In millions)         
December 31, 2017         
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Asset positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
A$4,879
 $7
 $(5) $
 $2
Cleared derivatives(2)
85,692
 83
 (2) 
 81
Liability positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
AA300
 (1) 1
 
 
A638
 
 
 
 
BBB1,641
 (1) 1
 
 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties93,150
 88
 (5) 
 83
Member institutions(3)
16
 
 
 
 
Total93,166
 $88
 $(5) $
 $83
Derivative positions without credit exposure6,443
        
Total notional$99,609
        


82



December 31, 2016         
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Asset positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
A$2,872
 $9
 $(6) $
 $3
BBB826
 2
 (1) 
 1
Cleared derivatives(2)
55,024
 54
 8
 
 62
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties58,722
 65
 1
 
 66
Member institutions(3)
13
 
 
 
 
Total58,735
 $65
 $1
 $
 $66
Derivative positions without credit exposure6,334
        
Total notional$65,069
        

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody's or S&P ratings.
(2)Represents derivative transactions cleared with LCH Ltd, the Bank’s clearinghouse, which is not rated. LCH Ltd’s parent, LCH Group Holdings Limited, was rated A+ by S&P. On May 31, 2017, S&P lowered the rating to A and withdrew the rating at LCH Group Holdings Limited’s request. LCH Ltd’s ultimate parent, London Stock Exchange Group, plc., is rated A3 by Moody’s and A- by S&P.
(3)Member institutions include mortgage delivery commitments with members.

2021.
The increase or decrease in the credit exposure net of cash collateral, from one period to the next, may be affected by changes in several variables, such as the size and composition of the portfolio, market values of derivatives, and accrued interest.

Based on the master netting arrangements, its credit analyses, and the collateral requirements in place with each counterparty, the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on its derivative agreements.

The following tables present the Bank’s credit exposure to its derivative dealer counterparties at the dates indicated.
Credit Exposure to Derivative Dealer Counterparties
(In millions)
December 31, 2021
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional AmountNet Fair Value of Derivatives Before CollateralCash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty
Noncash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties
Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives
A$1,500 $$(9)$— $— 
Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives
A42 (1)— — 
Cleared derivatives(2)
45,235 (7)15 252 260 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties46,777 $$$252 $260 
Derivative positions without credit exposure16,839 
Total notional$63,616 
64

December 31, 2020
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional AmountNet Fair Value of Derivatives Before CollateralCash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties
Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives
A$91 $$(3)$— $— 
Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives
A101 (4)— — 
Cleared derivatives(2)
71,417 (12)13 379 380 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties71,609 (13)14 379 380 
Member institutions(3)
— — — — 
Total71,610 $(13)$14 $379 $380 
Derivative positions without credit exposure7,035 
Total notional$78,645 
(1)The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody's or S&P ratings.
(2)Represents derivative transactions cleared with LCH Ltd, the Bank’s clearinghouse, which was rated AA- with a Stable CreditWatch by S&P at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(3)Member institutions include mortgage delivery commitments with members.
The Bank primarily executes overnight index swap (OIS) derivatives indexed to SOFR and the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR) to manage interest rate risk. The following table presents the notional amount of interest rate swaps by interest rate index broken out by the pay or receive leg at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
LIBOR-Indexed Interest Rate Swaps by Interest Rate Index
(In millions)20212020
Interest Rate IndexPay LegReceive LegPay LegReceive Leg
Fixed$25,846 $37,220 $47,425 $24,640 
LIBOR337 1,533 2,578 9,647 
SOFR35,887 22,526 20,481 32,609 
OIS - EFFR996 1,787 7,380 10,968 
Total notional amount$63,066 $63,066 $77,864 $77,864 
The following tables present the notional amount of interest rate swaps with LIBOR exposure for LIBOR tenors that cease or will no longer be representative immediately after June 30, 2023, by termination date broken out by the pay or receive leg and further bifurcated by cleared and uncleared derivative transactions at December 31, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2021, interest rate caps and floors indexed to LIBOR totaling $550 million were due to terminate after June 30, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, interest rate caps and floors indexed to LIBOR totaling $230 million were due to terminate in 2021 and totaling $550 million were due to terminate after June 30, 2023. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” for more information on the LIBOR transition and on SOFR as an alternative market benchmark.
65

LIBOR-Indexed Interest Rate Swaps by Termination Date
(In millions)
December 31, 2021
Pay LegReceive Leg
Termination DateClearedUnclearedClearedUncleared
Terminates in 2022$210 $35 $517 $112 
Terminates through June 30, 202352 — 309 23 
Terminates thereafter(1)
40 — 562 10 
Total Notional Amount$302 $35 $1,388 $145 
December 31, 2020
Pay LegReceive Leg
Termination DateClearedUnclearedClearedUncleared
Terminates in 2021$1,523 $238 $6,852 $213 
Terminates in 2022559 35 887 112 
Terminates through June 30, 2023100 — 369 22 
Terminates thereafter(1)
28 95 798 394 
Total Notional Amount$2,210 $368 $8,906 $741 
(1)For more information on the Bank’s Transition Plan, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition.”

Market Risk


Market risk is defined as the risk to the Bank'sBank’s market value of capital and future earnings (excluding the impact of any cumulative net gains or losses on derivatives and associated hedged items and on financial instruments carried at fair value) as a result of movements in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors (market rate factors). This profile reflects the Bank’s objective of maintaining a conservative asset-liability mix and its commitment to providing value to its members through products and dividends without subjecting their investments in Bank capital stock to significant market risk.

The Bank’s Risk Management PolicyAppetite Framework includes a market risk management objective aimed at maintaining a relatively low adverse exposure of the market value of capital and future earnings (excluding the impact of any cumulative net gains or losses on derivatives and associated hedged items and on financial instruments carried at fair value) to changes in market rate factors. See “Total Bank Market Risk” below.

Market risk identification and measurement are primarily accomplished through market value of capital sensitivity analyses and projected earnings and adjusted return on capital sensitivity analyses. The Risk Management PolicyAppetite Framework approved by the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors establishes market risk policy limits and market risk measurement standards at the total Bank level as well as at the business segment level. Additional guidelines approved by the Bank’s Enterprise Risk Committee apply to the Bank’s two business segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business. These guidelines provide limits that are monitored at the segment level and are consistent with the Bank’s policy limits.Risk Appetite Framework. Market risk is managed for each business segment on a daily basis, as discussed below in “Segment Market Risk.” Compliance with Bank policieslimits and guidelines is reviewed by the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors on a regular basis, along with a corrective action plan if applicable.



8366



Total Bank Market Risk

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity – The Bank uses market value of capital sensitivity (the interest rate sensitivity of the net fair value of all assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements) as an important measure of the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates.

The Bank’s market value of capital sensitivity policyrisk limits for the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous parallel shift of a plus or minus 100-basis-point change in interest rates from current rates (base case) tois no worse than –4.0% ofa 3.0% change in the estimated market value of capital. In addition, the policyrisk limits for the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous plus or minus 100-basis-point change in interest rates measured from interest rates that are 200 basis points above or below the base case tois no worse than –6.0%4.0% of the estimated market value of capital. In the case where a market risk sensitivity compliance metric cannot be estimated with a parallel shift in interest rates because of prevailing low interest rates, the sensitivity metric is not reported. The Bank’s measured market value of capital sensitivity was within the policy limits as of December 31, 2017.

2021.
To determine the Bank’s estimated risk sensitivities to interest rates for the market value of capital sensitivity, the Bank uses a third-party proprietary asset and liability system to calculate estimated market values under alternative interest rate scenarios. The system analyzes all of the Bank’s financial instruments, including derivatives, on a transaction-level basis using sophisticated valuation models with consistent and appropriate behavioral assumptions and current position data. The system also includes a third-party mortgage prepayment model.

At least annually, the Bank reexamines the major assumptions and methodologies used in the model, including interest rate curves, spreads for discounting, and mortgage prepayment assumptions. The Bank also compares the mortgage prepayment assumptions in the third-party model to other sources, including actual mortgage prepayment history.

The following table below presents the sensitivity of the market value of capital (the market value of all of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and associated interest rate exchange agreements, with mortgage assets valued using market spreads implied by current market prices) to changes in interest rates. The table presents the estimated percentage change in the Bank’s market value of capital that would be expected to result from changes in interest rates under different interest rate scenarios, using market spread assumptions.

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
+200 basis-point change above current rates–2.3%–3.0%
+100 basis-point change above current rates–0.9–1.3
–100 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+0.5+4.9
–200 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+4.9+5.2
(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates
     
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
2017 2016 
+200 basis-point change above current rates–3.8%–4.3%
+100 basis-point change above current rates–1.7 –2.0 
–100 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+2.0 +2.5 
–200 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+5.0 +6.3 

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)
Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.

(2)Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative rates.
The Bank’s estimates of the sensitivity of the market value of capital to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2017,2021, are comparable towith the estimates as of December 31, 2016. LIBOR interest rates as2020, with the exception of December 31, 2017, were 71 basis points higher for the 1-year term, 28 basis points higher for the 5-year term,declining 100 basis-point rate scenario. The increase in intermediate and 6 basis points higher for the 10-year term. Becauselong-term interest rates in the decliningfirst quarter of 2021 resulted in a larger absolute down 100 basis-point rate scenarios are limitedshock relative to non-negative interestyearend. Interest rates andcontinue to remain at historically low levels, ranging from 5 basis points for the current interest rate environments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were low,one-month Treasury bill to 150 basis points for the interest rates in the declining rate scenarios may not decrease to the same extent that the interest rates in the rising rate scenarios can increase.


84



ten-year Treasury note.
The Bank'sBank’s Risk Management Policy provides guidelines for the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock based on the ratio of the Bank'sBank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock. If
67

this ratio at the end of any quarter is: (i) less than 100% but greater than or equal to 90%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month LIBORFederal funds effective rate for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and any excess capital stock repurchases would not exceed $500 million (subject to certain conditions); (ii) less than 90% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend and any excess capital stock repurchases would be subject to the same limitations and conditions as in (i) above, except that any excess capital stock repurchases would not exceed 4% of the Bank'sBank’s outstanding capital stock as of the repurchase date; and (iii) less than 70%, the Bank would not pay a dividend, not repurchase excess capital stock (but continue to redeem excess capital stock as provided in the Bank's Capital Plan)Bank’s capital plan), limit the acquisition of certain assets, and review the Bank'sBank’s risk policies. A decision by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to declare or not declare any dividend or repurchase any excess capital stock is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks. The ratio of the Bank'sBank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock was 207%310% as of December 31, 2017.2021.

Adjusted Return on Capital – The adjusted return on capital is a measure used by the Bank to assess financial performance. The adjusted return on capital is based on current period economic earnings that exclude the effects of unrealized net gains or losses resulting from the Bank’s derivatives and associated hedged items and from financial instruments carried at fair value, which will generally reverse through changes in future valuations and settlements of contractual interest cash flows over the remaining contractual terms to maturity or by the call or put date of the assets and liabilities held under the fair value option, hedged assets and liabilities, and derivatives.Economic earnings also exclude the interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the 20% of net income allocated to the Bank’s restricted retained earnings account in accordance with the FHLBanks’ JCE Agreement. Economic earnings exclude these amounts in order to more accurately reflect the amount of earnings that may be available to be paid as dividends to shareholders.

stock.
The Bank limitsBank’s Risk Appetite Framework incorporates a limit on the sensitivity of projected financial performance through a Board of Directors policy limit onto projected adverse changes in the adjusted return on capital. The Bank’s adjusted return on capital sensitivity policy limitslimit to the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous parallel shift of a plus or minus 200-basis-point change in interest rates from current rates (base case) to no worse than –120 basis points from the base case projected adjusted return on capital. Given the current low interest rate environment, in the downward shift interest rates were limited to non-negative rates. With the indicated interest rate shifts, the adjusted return on capital for the projected 12-month horizon would be expected to decrease by 2827 basis points in the –200 basis pointsbasis-points scenario, well within the policy limit of –120 basis points.

Duration Gap – Duration gap is the difference between the estimated durations (market value sensitivity) of assets and liabilities (including the impact of interest rate exchange agreements) and reflects the extent to which estimated maturity and repricing cash flows for assets and liabilities are matched. The Bank monitors duration gap analysis at the total Bank level and does not have a policyrisk limit. The Bank’s duration
Total Bank Duration Gap Analysis
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020

Amount
(In millions)
Duration Gap(1)
(In months)
Amount
(In millions)
Duration Gap(1)
(In months)
Assets$54,121 $68,634 
Liabilities47,897 62,440 
Net$6,224 — $6,194 
(1)Duration gap was one month at December 31, 2017, and one month at December 31, 2016.values include the impact of interest rate exchange agreements.

Total Bank Duration Gap Analysis
        
 2017 2016
  
Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)
(In months)

 
Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)(2)
(In months) 

Assets$123,385
 4
 $91,941
 6
Liabilities116,579
 3
 86,404
 5
Net$6,806
 1
 $5,537
 1

(1)Duration gap values include the impact of interest rate exchange agreements.
(2)
Because of the low interest rate environment, the duration gap is estimated using an instantaneous, one-sided parallel change upward of 100 basis points from base case interest rates.


85



Segment Market Risk. The financial performance and interest rate risks of each business segment are managed within prescribed guidelines and policy limits.

Advances-Related Business – Interest rate risk arises from the advances-related business primarily through the use of shareholder-contributed capital and retained earnings to fund fixed rate investments of targeted amounts and maturities. In general, advances result in very little net interest rate risk for the Bank because most fixed rate advances with original maturities greater than three months and all advances with embedded options are
68

simultaneously hedged with an interest rate swap or option with terms offsettingto offset the advance. The interest rate swap or option generally is maintained as a hedge for the life of the advance. These hedged advances effectively create a pool of variable rate assets, which, in combination with the strategy of raising debt swapped to variable rate liabilities, creates an advances portfolio with low net interest rate risk.

Money market investments used for liquidity management generally have maturities of one month or less. In addition, to increase the Bank’s liquidity position, the Bank invests in non-MBS agencyTreasury securities, generally with terms of less than three years. These fixed rate investments may beare swapped to variable rate or fixed rate, and the interest rate risk resulting from the fixed rate coupon is hedged with an interest rate swap or fixed rate debt.

investments.
The interest rate risk in the advances-related business is primarily associated with the Bank’s strategy for investing capital (capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and retained earnings). The Bank’s strategy is generally to invest 50% of capital in short-term investments (maturities of three months or less) and 50% in intermediate-term investments (a laddered portfolio of investments with maturities of up to four years). However, this strategy may be altered from time to time depending on market conditions. The strategy to invest 50% of capital in short-term assets is intended to mitigate the market value of capital risks associated with the potential repurchase or redemption of excess capital stock. Excess capital stock usually results from a decline in a borrower’s outstanding advances or by a membership termination. Under the Bank’s capital plan, capital stock, when repurchased or redeemed, is required to be repurchased or redeemed at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. The strategy to invest 50% of capital in a laddered portfolio of investments with short to intermediate maturities is intended to take advantage of the higher earnings available from a generally positively sloped yield curve, when intermediate-term investments generally have higher yields than short-term investments.

The Bank updates the repricing and maturity gaps for actual asset, liability, and derivative transactions that occur in the advances-related segment each day. The Bank regularly compares the targeted repricing and maturity gaps to the actual repricing and maturity gaps to identify rebalancing needs for the targeted gaps. On a weekly basis, the Bank evaluates the projected impact of expected maturities and scheduled repricingsrepricing of assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements on the interest rate risk of the advances-related segment. The analyses are prepared under base case and alternate interest rate scenarios to assess the effect of options embedded in the advances, related financing, and hedges. These analyses are also used to measure and manage potential reinvestment risk (when the remaining term of advances is shorter than the remaining term of the financing) and potential refinancing risk (when the remaining term of advances is longer than the remaining term of the financing).

Because of the short-term and variable rate nature of the assets, liabilities, and derivatives of the advances-related business, the Bank’s interest rate risk guidelines address the amounts of net assets that are expected to mature or reprice in a given period. The market value sensitivity analyses and net interest income simulations are also used to identify and measure risk and variances to the target interest rate risk exposure in the advances-related segment.

Mortgage-Related Business– The Bank’s mortgage assets include MBS, most of which are classified as held-to-maturity (HTM)HTM or available-for-sale (AFS),AFS, with a small amount classified as trading, and mortgage loans held for portfolio purchased under the MPF Program. The Bank is exposed to interest rate risk from the mortgage-related business because the principal cash flows of the mortgage assets and the liabilities that fund them are not exactly matched through time and across all possible interest rate scenarios, given the impacteffect of mortgage prepayments and the existence of interest rate caps on certain adjustable rate MBS.


The Bank manages the interest rate risk and market risk of the mortgage-related segment through its investment in low-risk assets and selected funding and hedging strategies. The total carrying value of MBS and mortgage loans at December 31, 2021, was $14.0 billion, including $13.0 billion in MBS and $1.0 billion in mortgage loans. The total carrying value of MBS and mortgage loans at December 31, 2020, was $17.7 billion, including $15.8 billion in MBS and $1.9 billion in mortgage loans. Floating rate securities, and fixed rate multifamily securities that have been converted to floating rate through the use of interest rate swaps, were $12.2 billion, or 87%, of MBS and mortgage loans at December 31, 2021, and $14.2 billion, or 80%, of MBS and mortgage loans at December 31, 2020. Intermediate and long-term fixed rate assets, whose interest rate and market risks have been partially offset through the use of fixed rate callable debt, fixed rate non-callable debt, and certain interest rate swaps, were $1.8
86
69



Historically, the Bank purchased a mixbillion, or 13%, of intermediate-term fixed rateMBS and adjustable rate MBS. The last purchasemortgage loans, at December 31, 2021, and $3.5 billion, or 20%, of a fixed rate MBS was in March 2014. Since March 2014, all MBS purchases were agency adjustable rate MBS. MPFand mortgage loans that have been acquired are medium- or long-term fixed rate mortgage assets. This results in a mortgage portfolio that has a diversified set of interest rate risk attributes.

at December 31, 2020.
The estimated market risk of the mortgage-related business is managed both at the time an asset is purchased and on an ongoing basis for the total portfolio. At the time of purchase (for all significant mortgage asset acquisitions), the Bank analyzes the estimated earnings sensitivity and estimated market value sensitivity, taking into consideration the estimated mortgage prepayment sensitivity of the mortgage assets and anticipated funding and hedging activities under various interest rate scenarios. The related funding and hedging transactions are executed at or close to the time of purchase of a mortgage asset.

At least monthly, the Bank reviews the estimated market risk profile of the entire portfolio of mortgage assets and related funding and hedging transactions. The Bank then considers rebalancing strategies to modify the estimated mortgage portfolio market risk profile. Periodically, the Bank performs more in-depth analyses, which include an analysis of the impacts of non-parallel shifts in the yield curve and assessments of the impacts of unanticipated mortgage prepayment behavior. Based on these analyses, the Bank may take actions to rebalance the mortgage portfolio’s market risk profile. These rebalancing strategies may include entering into new funding and hedging transactions, forgoing or modifying certain funding or hedging transactions normally executed with new mortgage purchases, or terminating certain funding and hedging transactions for the mortgage asset portfolio.

The Bank manages the estimated interest rate risk associated with mortgage assets, including mortgage prepayment risk, through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank may obtain funding through callable and non-callable FHLBank System debt and may execute derivative transactions to achieve principal cash flow patterns and market value sensitivities for the liabilities and derivatives that provide a significant offset to the interest rate and mortgage prepayment risks associated with the mortgage assets. Debt issued to finance mortgage assets may be fixed rate debt, callable fixed rate debt, adjustable rate debt, or callable adjustable rate debt. Derivatives may be used as temporary hedges of anticipated debt issuance or long-term hedges of debt used to finance the mortgage assets. The derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk of fixed rate mortgage assets generally may be callable and non-callable pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Derivatives may also be used to offset the interest rate cap risk embedded in adjustable rate MBS.

As discussed above in “Total Bank Market Risk Market Value of Capital Sensitivity”Sensitivity,” the Bank uses market value of capital sensitivity as a primary market value metric for measuring the Bank’s exposure to interest rates. The Bank’s interest rate risk policieslimits and guidelines for the mortgage-related business address the market value of capital sensitivity of the assets, liabilities, and derivatives of the mortgage-related business.

The following table presents results of the estimated market value of capital sensitivity analysis attributable to the mortgage-related business as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
20212020
+200 basis-point change–0.5%–1.3%
+100 basis-point change–0.1–0.4
–100 basis-point change(2)
–0.2+2.8
–200 basis-point change(2)
+2.6+2.9
(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in Interest Rates
     
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
2017 2016 
+200 basis-point change–1.7%–2.2%
+100 basis-point change–0.7 –1.0 
–100 basis-point change(2)
+1.1 +1.3 
–200 basis-point change(2)
+3.2 +3.8 
(2)Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative rates.

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)
Interest ratesThe explanations for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.


87



For the mortgage-related business, thechanges in Bank’s estimates of the sensitivity of the market value of capital to changes in interest rates as ofattributable to the mortgage-related business from December 31, 2017,2020, to December 31, 2021, are comparablethe
70

same as the explanations for the sensitivity of the market value of capital attributable to all of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and associated interest rate exchange agreements.

For a discussion of risk factors related to the estimates as of December 31, 2016. LIBOR interest rates as of December 31, 2017, were 71 basis points higher for the 1-year term, 28 basis points higher for the 5-year term, and 6 basis points higher for the 10-year term. Because interest rates in the declining rate scenarios are limited to non-negative interest rates and the current interest rate environments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were low, the interest rates in the declining rate scenarios may not decrease to the same extent that the interest rates in the rising rate scenarios can increase.COVID-19 pandemic, see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”


Interest Rate Exchange Agreements

A derivative transaction or interest rate exchange agreement is a financial contract whose fair value is generally derived from changes in the value of an underlying asset or liability. The Bank uses interest rate swaps; interest rate cap and floor agreements; and callable and putable interest rate swaps (collectively, interest rate exchange agreements) to manage its exposure to market risks inherent in its ordinary course of business, including its lending, investment, and funding activities.

The Bank uses interest rate exchange agreements to implement the following hedging strategies for addressing market risk:
To convert fixed rate advances to adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to fixed interest rates.
To convert certain adjustable rate indexed advances to other adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to basis risk.
To convert fixed rate consolidated obligations to adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to fixed interest rates. (A combined structure of the callable derivative and callable debt instrument is usually lower in cost than a comparable adjustable rate debt instrument, allowing the Bank to reduce its funding costs.)
To convert certain adjustable rate indexed consolidated obligations to other adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to basis risk.
To reduce the interest rate sensitivity and modify the repricing frequency of assets and liabilities.
To obtain callable fixed rate equivalent funding by entering into a callable pay-fixed interest rate swap in connection with the issuance of a short-term discount note. The callable fixed rate equivalent funding is used to reduce the Bank’s exposure to prepayment of mortgage assets.
To offset an embedded option in an advance.


The following table summarizes the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements by type of hedged item, hedging instrument, associated hedging strategy, accounting designation as specified under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and notional amount as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.


2020.
88
71



Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
(In millions)  Notional Amount
Hedging InstrumentHedging StrategyHedge Designation20212020
Hedged Item: Advances    
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rateFair Value Hedge$9,983 $21,502 
Received fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swapAdjustable rate advance converted to a fixed rate
Economic Hedge(1)
1,905 1,800 
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rate
Economic Hedge(1)
2,221 3,124 
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap; swap may be callable at the Bank’s option or putable at the counterparty’s optionFixed rate advance (with or without an embedded cap) converted to an adjustable rate; advance and swap may be callable or putable; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option
Economic Hedge(1)
1,716 2,027 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
  5,842 6,951 
Total  15,825 28,453 
Hedged Item: Non-Callable Bonds   
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rateFair Value Hedge2,169 2,915 
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate
Economic Hedge(1)
30 30 
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; matched to non-callable bond accounted for under the fair value option
Economic Hedge(1)
— 80 
Basis swapFixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond previously converted to an adjustable rate index, converted to another adjustable rate index to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps
Economic Hedge(1)
— 5,733 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
  30 5,843 
Total  2,199 8,758 
Hedged Item: Callable Bonds
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s optionFixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callableFair Value Hedge11,413 180 
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s optionFixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable
Economic Hedge(1)
765 750 
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s optionFixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable; matched to callable bond accounted for under the fair value option
Economic Hedge(1)
618 — 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
1,383 750 
Total12,796 930 
72
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
         
(In millions)     Notional Amount
Hedging Instrument Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation 2017
 2016
Hedged Item: Advances        
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge $16,713
 $11,880
Basis swap  Adjustable rate advance converted to another adjustable rate index to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps  
Economic Hedge(1)
 2
 2
Received fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap Adjustable rate advance converted to a fixed rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,972
 1,432
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 19,401
 1,681
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap; swap may be callable at the Bank’s option or putable at the counterparty’s option Fixed rate advance (with or without an embedded cap) converted to an adjustable rate; advance and swap may be callable or putable; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 6,163
 3,677
Interest rate cap or floor Interest rate cap or floor embedded in an adjustable rate advance; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 83
 30
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
     27,621
 6,822
Total     44,334
 18,702
Hedged Item: Non-Callable Bonds        
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge 5,373
 8,371
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,106
 6,550
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; matched to non-callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 90
 590
Basis swap Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond previously converted to an adjustable rate index, converted to another adjustable rate index to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 7,050
 500
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 4,620
 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
     12,866
 7,640
Total     18,239
 16,011


89



Interest Rate Exchange Agreements (continued)
(In millions)  Notional Amount
Hedging InstrumentHedging StrategyHedge Designation20212020
Hedged Item: Discount Notes  
Pay fixed, receive adjustable callable interest rate swapDiscount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate callable debt that offsets the prepayment risk of mortgage assets
Economic Hedge(1)
50 100 
Basis swap or receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swapDiscount note converted to short-term adjustable rate to hedge repricing gaps
Economic Hedge(1)
16,755 13,192 
Pay fixed, receive adjustable non-callable interest rate swapDiscount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate non-callable debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets
Economic Hedge(1)
100 250 
Total  16,905 13,542 
Hedged Item: Investment Securities  
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate investment securities converted to an adjustable rateFair Value Hedge7,961 10,463 
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swapFixed rate investment securities converted to an adjustable rate
Economic Hedge(1)
250 4,200 
Interest rate capInterest rate cap used to offset cap risk embedded in floating rate investment securities
Economic Hedge(1)
550 780 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
800 4,980 
Total8,761 15,443 
Hedged Item: Offsetting Derivatives 
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap and receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swapInterest rate swap used to offset the economic effect of interest rate swap that is no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations
Economic Hedge(1)
7,130 11,518 
Total  7,130 11,518 
Stand-Alone Derivatives
Mortgage delivery commitmentsN/AN/A— 
Total— 
Total Notional Amount $63,616 $78,645 
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements (continued)
         
(In millions)     Notional Amount
Hedging Instrument Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation 2017
 2016
Hedged Item: Callable Bonds        
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable Fair Value Hedge 2,184
 490
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable 
Economic Hedge(1)
 3,357
 685
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable; matched to callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 865
 950
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
     4,222
 1,635
Total     6,406
 2,125
Hedged Item: Discount Notes        
Pay fixed, receive adjustable callable interest rate swap Discount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate callable debt that offsets the prepayment risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,535
 1,535
Basis swap or receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap Discount note converted to short-term adjustable rate to hedge repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 26,435
 23,244
Pay fixed, receive adjustable non-callable interest rate swap Discount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate non-callable debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 400
 450
Total     28,370
 25,229
Hedged Item: Trading Securities        
Basis swap Basis swap hedging adjustable rate Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds 
Economic Hedge(1)
 750
 750
Interest rate cap Interest rate cap used to offset cap risk embedded in floating rate MBS 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,480
 2,150
Total     2,230
 2,900
Hedged Item: Intermediary Positions and Offsetting Derivatives      
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap and receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap Interest rate swap used to offset the economic effect of interest rate swap that is no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations 
Economic Hedge(1)
 14
 89
Total     14
 89
Stand-Alone Derivatives        
Mortgage delivery commitments N/A N/A 16
 13
Total     16
 13
Total Notional Amount     $99,609
 $65,069

(1)Economic hedges are derivatives that are matched to balance sheet instruments or other derivatives that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

(1)Economic hedges are derivatives that are matched to balance sheet instruments or other derivatives that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Although the Bank uses interest rate exchange agreements to achieve the specific financial objectives described above, certain transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting (economic hedges). An economic hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability caused by changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are recorded in the Bank’s income but are not offset by corresponding changes in the value of the economically hedged assets and liabilities. Finance Agency regulations and the Bank’s Risk Management Policy prohibit the speculative use of interest rate exchange agreements, and the Bank does not trade derivatives for profit.


90



It is the Bank’s policy to use interest rate exchange agreements only to reduce the market risk exposures inherent in the otherwise unhedged asset and funding positions of the Bank and to achieve other financial objectives of the Bank, such as obtaining low-cost funding for advances and mortgage assets. The primary objective of the financial management practices of the Bank is to preserve and enhance the long-term economic performance and risk management of the Bank. In accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, reported net income and other comprehensive income will likely exhibit period-to-period volatility, which may be significant.

The following tables categorize the notional amounts and estimated fair values of the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements, unrealized gains and losses from the related hedged items, and estimated fair value gains and losses from financial instruments carried at fair value by type of accounting treatment and product as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.


73
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
Notional Amounts and Estimated Fair Values

         
December 31, 2017         
(In millions)
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Fair value hedges:         
Advances$16,713
 $85
 $(88) $
 $(3)
Non-callable bonds5,373
 (23) 24
 
 1
Callable bonds2,184
 (12) 13
 
 1
Subtotal24,270
 50
 (51) 
 (1)
Not qualifying for hedge accounting:        
Advances27,621
 27
 
 (28) (1)
Non-callable bonds12,866
 
 
 (1) (1)
Callable bonds4,222
 (29) 
 10
 (19)
Discount notes28,370
 23
 
 
 23
FFCB bonds750
 (1) 
 
 (1)
MBS1,480
 1
 
 
 1
Mortgage delivery commitments16
 
 
 
 
Offsetting derivatives14
 
 
 
 
Subtotal75,339
 21
 
 (19) 2
Total excluding accrued interest99,609
 71
 (51) (19) 1
Accrued interest
 18
 (15) 9
 12
Total$99,609
 $89
 $(66) $(10) $13


91



December 31, 2016         
(In millions)
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Fair value hedges:         
Advances$11,880
 $23
 $(22) $
 $1
Non-callable bonds8,371
 7
 (8) 
 (1)
Callable bonds490
 (1) 2
 
 1
Subtotal20,741
 29
 (28) 
 1
Not qualifying for hedge accounting:        
Advances6,822
 
 
 2
 2
Non-callable bonds7,640
 
 
 (1) (1)
Callable bonds1,635
 (16) 
 10
 (6)
Discount notes25,229
 29
 
 
 29
FFCB bonds750
 (1) 
 
 (1)
MBS2,150
 6
 
 
 6
Mortgage delivery commitments13
 
 
 
 
Offsetting derivatives89
 
 
 
 
Subtotal44,328
 18
 
 11
 29
Total excluding accrued interest65,069
 47
 (28) 11
 30
Accrued interest
 12
 (10) 6
 8
Total$65,069
 $59
 $(38) $17
 $38

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if applicable, and the reported amounts of income, expenses, gains, and losses during the reporting period. Changes in these judgments, estimates, and assumptions could potentially affect the Bank’s financial position and results of operations significantly. Although the Bank believes these judgments, estimates, and assumptions to be reasonably accurate, actual results may differ.

The Bank has identified the following accounting policies and estimates as critical because they require the Bank to make subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies and estimates are: estimating the allowance for credit losses on the advances and mortgage loan portfolios;
accounting for derivatives;
estimating fair values of investments classified as trading and AFS, derivatives and associated hedged items carried at fair value in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and associated hedging activities, and financial instruments carried at fair value under the fair value option, option;
and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment for investment securities; and
estimating the prepayment speeds on MBS and mortgage loans for the accounting of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts and credit losses previously recorded prior to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to the measurement of credit losses on MBS and mortgage loans.
These policies and the judgments, estimates, and assumptions are also described in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”


92



Allowance for Credit Losses

The Bank has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses, where applicable, for:
advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of credit, collectively referred to as “credit products,”
MPF loans held for portfolio,
term securities purchased under agreements to resell, and
term Federal funds sold.

The allowance for credit losses for credit products and mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Program represents the Bank’s estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in these two portfolios. Determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because the Bank’s evaluation of the adequacy of the provision is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of estimated future cash flows, estimated losses based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends, all of which are subject to change. The Bank’s assumptions and judgments in estimating its allowance for credit losses are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Credit Products. In determining the allowance for credit losses on credit products, the Bank evaluates its exposure to credit loss taking into consideration: (i) the Bank's judgment as to the creditworthiness of the borrowers to which the Bank lends funds, and (ii) review and valuation of the collateral pledged by borrowers.

The Bank has policies and procedures in place to manage its credit risk on credit products. These include:
Monitoring the creditworthiness and financial condition of the borrowers.
Assessing the quality and value of collateral pledged by borrowers to secure advances.
Establishing borrowing capacities based on collateral value and type for each borrower, including assessment of margin requirements based on factors such as the cost to liquidate and inherent risk exposure based on collateral type.
Evaluating historical loss experience.

The Bank is required by the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations to obtain sufficient collateral on credit products and to accept only certain collateral for credit products, such as one- to four-family first lien residential mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, MBS, U.S. government and agency securities, deposits in the Bank, and certain other real estate-related collateral, such as commercial real estate loans and second lien residential mortgage loans. The Bank may also accept small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) as eligible collateral from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing Act added secured loans for community development activities as a type of collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions.

At December 31, 2017, the Bank had $77.4 billion of advances outstanding and collateral pledged with an estimated borrowing capacity of $262.5 billion. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $49.8 billion of advances outstanding and collateral pledged with an estimated borrowing capacity of $204.2 billion.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies as of December 31, 2017, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Therefore, no allowance for losses on credit products was deemed necessary by the Bank. The Bank has never experienced a credit loss on any of its credit products.

Significant changes to any of the factors described above could materially affect the Bank’s allowance for losses on credit products. For example, the Bank’s current assumptions about the financial strength of any borrower may change because of various circumstances, such as new information becoming available regarding the borrower’s financial strength or changes in the national or regional economy. New information may cause the Bank to: place a

93



borrower on credit watch, require the borrower to pledge additional collateral, require the borrower to deliver collateral, adjust the borrowing capacity of the borrower's collateral, require prepayment of the credit products, or provide for losses on the credit products.

Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program. In determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, the Bank evaluates its exposure to credit loss taking into consideration: (i) the Bank’s judgment as to the eligibility of participating financial institutions to continue to service and credit-enhance the loans sold to the Bank, (ii) evaluation of credit exposure on purchased loans, (iii) valuation of available credit enhancements, and (iv) estimation of loss exposure and historical loss experience.

The Bank has policies and procedures in place to manage its credit risk. These include:
Monitoring the creditworthiness and financial condition of the institutions that sold the mortgage loans to the Bank or their successors (both considered to be participating financial institutions) and their ability to meet servicing obligations.
Determining required credit enhancements to be provided by participating financial institutions and assessing the availability of other credit enhancements.
Estimating loss exposure and historical loss experience to establish an adequate level of allowance for credit losses.

The Bank maintains an allowance for credit losses, net of credit enhancements, on mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Program at levels that it believes to be adequate to absorb estimated losses identified and inherent in the total mortgage portfolio. Setting the level of allowance for credit losses requires significant judgment and regular evaluation by the Bank. Many factors, including delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, collectability of credit enhancements from institutions or from mortgage insurers, and prevailing economic conditions, are important in estimating mortgage loan losses, taking into account the available credit enhancement. The use of different estimates or assumptions as well as changes in external factors could produce materially different allowance levels.

The Bank calculates its estimated allowance for credit losses for MPF Original and MPF Plus loans as described below.

The Bank has a process in place for monitoring and identifying loans that are deemed impaired. The Bank also uses a credit model to estimate credit losses. A loan is considered impaired when it is reported 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans The Bank evaluates the allowance for credit losses on MPF mortgage loans based on two components. The first component applies to each individual loan that is specifically identified as impaired. The Bank evaluates the exposure on these loans by considering the first layer of loss protection (the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan) and the availability and collectability of credit enhancements under the terms of each master commitment, and then records a provision for credit losses. For this component, the Bank established a de minimis allowance for credit losses for MPF Original loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. For MPF Plus loans, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The second component applies to loans that are not specifically identified as impaired and is based on the Bank’s estimate of probable credit losses on those loans as of the financial statement date. The Bank evaluates the credit loss exposure on a loan pool basis considering various observable data, such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The Bank also considers the availability and collectability of credit enhancements from participating financial institutions or from mortgage insurers under the terms of each master commitment. For this component, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses for MPF Original loans totaling de minimis amounts

94



as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for MPF Plus loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Significant changes in any of the factors described above could materially affect the Bank’s allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans. In addition, as the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio ages and becomes sufficiently seasoned and additional loss history is obtained, the Bank may have to adjust its methods of estimating its allowance for credit losses and make additional provisions for credit losses in the future.

Term Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered collateralized financing arrangements and effectively represent short-term loans to counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, which are classified as assets in the Statements of Condition. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank by third-party custodians approved by the Bank. In accordance with the terms of these loans, if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is charged to earnings. The Bank did not have any term securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Term Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, and these investments are evaluated for purposes of an allowance for credit losses if the investment is not paid when due. All investments in Federal funds sold as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were repaid or are expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms.

Accounting for Derivatives

Accounting for derivatives includes the following assumptions and estimates by the Bank: (i) assessing whether the hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting, (ii) assessing whether an embedded derivative should be bifurcated, (iii) calculating the estimated effectiveness of the hedging relationship, (iv) evaluating exposure associated with counterparty credit risk, and (v) estimating the fair value of the derivatives (which is discussed in “Fair Values” below). The Bank’s assumptions and judgments include subjective calculations and estimates based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and could be materially different based on different assumptions, calculations, and estimates.

For additional discussion of the Bank’s accounting for derivatives, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 18“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 14 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Assessment of Effectiveness. Highly effective hedging relationships that use interest rate swaps as the hedging instrument and that meet certain criteria under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities may qualify for the “short-cut” method of assessing effectiveness. The short-cut method allows the Bank to make the assumption of no ineffectiveness, which means that the change in fair value of the hedged item can be assumed to be equal to the change in fair value of the derivative. No further evaluation of effectiveness is performed for these hedging relationships unless a critical term is changed. Included in these hedging relationships may be hedged items for which the settlement of the hedged item occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. The Bank defines market settlement conventions to be 5 business days or less for advances and 30 calendar days, using a next business day convention, for consolidated obligations. The Bank designates the hedged item in a qualifying hedging relationship as of its trade date. Although the hedged item will not be recognized in the financial statements until the settlement date, in certain circumstances when the fair value of the hedging instrument is zero on the trade date, the Bank believes that it meets a condition that allows the use of the short-cut method. The Bank then records the changes in fair value of the derivative and the hedged item beginning on the trade date.


95
74



For a hedging relationship that does not qualify for the short-cut method, the Bank measures its effectiveness using the “long-haul” method, in which the change in fair value of the hedged item must be measured separately from the change in fair value of the derivative. The Bank designs effectiveness testing criteria based on its knowledge of the hedged item and hedging instrument that were employed to create the hedging relationship. The Bank uses regression analyses or other statistical analyses to evaluate effectiveness results, which must fall within established tolerances. Effectiveness testing is performed at inception and on at least a quarterly basis for both prospective considerations and retrospective evaluations.

Hedge Discontinuance.When a hedging relationship fails the effectiveness test, the Bank immediately discontinues hedge accounting for that relationship. In addition, the Bank discontinues hedge accounting when it is no longer probable that a forecasted transaction will occur in the original expected time period and when a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the required criteria of a firm commitment. The Bank treats modifications of hedged items (such as a reduction in par value, change in maturity date, or change in strike rates) as a termination of a hedge relationship.

Accounting for Hedge Ineffectiveness. The Bank quantifies and records in other income the ineffective portion of its hedging relationships. Ineffectiveness for fair value hedging relationships is calculated as the difference between the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item. Ineffectiveness for anticipatory hedge relationships is recorded when the change in the forecasted fair value of the hedging instrument exceeds the change in the fair value of the anticipated hedged item.

Credit Risk for Counterparties.The Bank is subject to credit risk as a result of potential nonperformance by counterparties to the derivative agreements. All uncleared derivatives with counterparties that are members of the Bank and that are not derivative dealers, in which the Bank serves as an intermediary, are fully secured by eligible collateral and are subject to both the Bank'sBank’s Advances and Security Agreement and a master netting agreement. For all derivative dealer counterparties, the Bank selects only highly rated derivative dealers and major banks that meet the Bank's eligibility requirements. In addition, the Bank enters into master netting agreements and bilateral security agreements with all active derivative dealer and major bank counterparties that provide for delivery of collateral at specified levels tied to counterparty credit rating to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. The Bank makes judgments on each counterparty’s creditworthiness and estimates of collateral values in analyzing its credit risk for nonperformance by counterparties. In addition, the Bank is subject to nonperformance by the clearinghouse(s) and clearing agents. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent to the clearinghouse exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. However, the use of cleared derivatives mitigates the Bank’s overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and variation margin is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. See additional discussion of credit exposure to derivatives counterparties in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Derivative Counterparties.”

Fair Values

Fair Value Measurements. Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP, and stipulates disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting pronouncements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The Bank uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments for certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is a market-based measurement, and the price used to measure fair value is an exit price considered from the perspective of the market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability.


96



This guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation technique used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quotedQuoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active markets.market that the reporting entity can access on the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which
75

the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 – Inputs toother than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the valuation methodologyasset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets andor liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets andthat are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly(e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Valuations are supported by littlederived from techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, which include pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or no market activity or by the Bank’s own assumptions.

similar techniques.
A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The use of fair value to measure the Bank'sBank’s financial instruments is fundamental to the Bank'sBank’s financial statements and is a critical accounting estimate because a significant portion of the Bank'sBank’s assets and liabilities are carried at fair value.

The following assets and liabilities, including those for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2017:2021:
Trading securities
AFS securities
Certain advances
Derivative assets and liabilities
Certain consolidated obligation bonds
Certain other assets

In general, these items carried at fair value are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are valued primarily using inputs that are observable in the marketplace or can be substantially derived from observable market data.

The total notional amount of derivatives as of December 31, 2021, was $64 billion, of which 50% were designated as hedging instruments, and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021, was $8 million and $5 million, respectively. The fair values of interest rate-related derivatives and hedged items are estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow models that use market-observable inputs, such as swap rates and volatility assumptions.
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustment in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).circumstances. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank measured its REO and certain impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio on a nonrecurring basis at Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Bank monitors and evaluates the inputs into its fair value measurements to ensure that the asset or liability is properly categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Because items classified as Level 3 are generally based on unobservable inputs, the process to determine the fair value of such items is generally more subjective and involves a higher degree of judgment and assumptions by the Bank.

The Bank employs internal control processes to validate the fair value of its financial instruments. These control processes are designed to ensure that the fair value measurements used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable market-based inputs are not available, the control
76

processes are designed to ensure that the valuation approach used is appropriate and consistently applied and that the assumptions and judgments made are reasonable. The Bank’s control processes provide for segregation of duties and oversight of the fair value methodologies and valuations by the Bank. Valuation models are regularly reviewed by the Bank and are subject to an independent model validation process. Any changes to the valuation methodology or the models are also reviewed to confirm that the changes are appropriate.

97




The assumptions and judgments applied by the Bank may have a significant effect on its estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions as well as changes in market conditions could have a material effect on the Bank’s results of operations or financial condition. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1915 – Fair Value” for further information regarding the fair value measurement guidance (including the classification within the fair value hierarchy) and the summary of valuation methodologies and primary inputs used to measure fair value for all the Bank’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value.
The Bank continues to refine its valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent. While the Bank believes that its valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a materially different estimate of fair value as of the reporting date. These fair values may not represent the actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of yearend or that will be realized in the future. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique or valuation methodology.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for Investment Securities. A security is considered impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. For impaired debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether: (i) it has the intent to sell the debt security; (ii) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis of the security; or (iii) it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired debt security. If any of these conditions is met, an OTTI on the security must be recognized.

With respect to any debt security, a credit loss is defined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. If a credit loss exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), the carrying value of the debt security is adjusted to its fair value. However, instead of recognizing the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value in earnings, only the amount of the impairment representing the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the amount of non-credit-related impairment is recognized in AOCI. The total OTTI is presented in the Statements of Income with an offset for the amount of the total OTTI that is recognized in AOCI. This presentation provides additional information about the amounts that the entity does not expect to collect related to a debt security. The credit loss on a debt security is limited to the amount of that security's unrealized losses.

For subsequent accounting of other-than-temporarily impaired securities, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the Bank records an additional OTTI. The amount of total OTTI for a security that was previously impaired is calculated as the difference between its amortized cost less the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI prior to the determination of OTTI and its fair value. For an other-than-temporarily impaired security that was previously impaired and has subsequently incurred an additional OTTI related to credit loss (limited to that security's unrealized losses), this additional credit-related OTTI, up to the amount in AOCI, would be reclassified out of non-credit-related OTTI in AOCI and charged to earnings. Any credit loss in excess of the related AOCI is charged to earnings.

Subsequent related increases and decreases (if not an OTTI) in the fair value of AFS securities will be netted against the non-credit component of OTTI previously recognized in AOCI.

For securities classified as HTM, the OTTI recognized in AOCI is accreted to the carrying value of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security is subsequently sold or there are additional decreases in cash flows expected to be collected). For securities classified as AFS, the Bank does not accrete the OTTI recognized in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities is fair value.


98



For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank recognizes accretion or amortization of OTTI credit charges along with the net interest income associated with the securities’ effective yield in net interest income in the Statement of Income. The total accretion or amortization associated with OTTI credit charges was $93 million, $101 million, and $82 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Bank updates its estimate of future expected cash flows for previously other-than-temporarily impaired securities on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairment on the security, any improvement in expected cash flows is accreted into interest income. This accretion, included in the total accretion or amortization amounts above, totaled $69 million, $81 million, and $74 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017, on a cumulative basis, the Bank had recognized $1.5 billion in credit-related OTTI in its Statements of Income. Each reporting period, these losses were based on the Bank’s then-current best estimates of lifetime losses on each security determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. As housing prices, mortgage credit conditions, and other key inputs into the Bank’s OTTI assumptions and estimates have improved, the Bank has seen significant increases in expected cash flows on previously other-than-temporarily-impaired securities. Based on the Bank’s current assumptions and estimates, the Bank’s estimate of lifetime losses on its other-than-temporarily-impaired securities as of December 31, 2017, is $829 million. As a result of the improvements in expected cash flows and resulting decreases in estimated lifetime losses, the Bank has recognized significant amounts of accretion-related income since 2015. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank estimates that it will accrete approximately $335 million of additional interest income associated with the reduction in OTTI losses over the life of the securities. This estimate of accretion of additional interest income is a forward-looking statement. The Bank updates its estimates on an ongoing basis, and actual results may differ materially from the Bank’s current estimation.

The Bank closely monitors the performance of its investment securities classified as AFS or HTM on at least a quarterly basis to evaluate its exposure to the risk of loss on these investments in order to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary.

Each FHLBank is responsible for making its own determination of impairment and of the reasonableness of the assumptions, inputs, and methodologies used and for performing the required present value calculations using appropriate historical cost bases and yields. FHLBanks that hold the same private-label MBS are required to consult with one another to ensure that any decision that a commonly held private-label MBS is other-than-temporarily impaired, including the determination of fair value and the credit loss component of the unrealized loss, is consistent among those FHLBanks.

In performing the cash flow analysis for each security, the Bank uses two third-party models. The first model projects prepayments, default rates, and loss severities on the underlying collateral based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the loans underlying the Bank's securities, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. Another significant input to the first model is the forecast of future housing price changes for the relevant states and CBSAs, which are based on an assessment of the regional housing markets. CBSA refers collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. As currently defined, a CBSA must contain at least one urban area with a population of 10,000 or more people. The FHLBanks’ OTTI Committee developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 5.0% to an increase of 12.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2017. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from an increase of 2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.

The month-by-month projections of future loan performance derived from the first model, which reflect projected prepayments, default rates, and loss severities, are then input into a second model that allocates the projected loan level cash flows and losses to the various security classes in each securitization structure in accordance with the structure's prescribed cash flow and loss allocation rules. When the credit enhancement for the senior securities in a securitization is derived from the presence of subordinated securities, losses are generally allocated first to the

99



subordinated securities until their principal balance is reduced to zero. The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined based on the model approach described above reflects a best-estimate scenario and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

At each quarter end, the Bank compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected on its PLRMBS to the amortized cost basis of the securities to determine whether a credit loss exists. For the Bank's variable rate and hybrid PLRMBS, the Bank uses the effective interest rate derived from a variable rate index (for example, the one-month LIBOR) plus the contractual spread, plus or minus a fixed spread adjustment when there is an existing discount or premium on the security. As the implied forward rates of the index change over time, the effective interest rates derived from that index will also change over time. The Bank then uses the effective interest rate for the security prior to impairment for determining the present value of the future estimated cash flows. For all securities, including securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank updates its estimate of future estimated cash flows on a quarterly basis.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Bank recorded a credit-related OTTI charge of $16 million, $16 million, and $15 million, respectively.

Because there is a risk that the Bank may record additional material OTTI charges in future periods, the Bank's earnings and retained earnings and its ability to pay dividends and repurchase excess capital stock could be adversely affected in future periods.

Additional information about OTTI charges associated with the Bank’s PLRMBS is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Amortization of Premiums and Accretion of Discounts and Credit Losses Previously Recorded Prior to the Adoption of New Accounting Guidance Related to the Measurement of Credit Losses on MBS and Purchased Mortgage Loans

When the Bank purchases MBS and mortgage loans, it does not necessarily pay the seller the par value of the MBS or the exact amount of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. If the Bank pays more than the par value or the unpaid principal balance, purchasing the asset at a premium, the premium reduces the yield the Bank recognizes on the asset below the coupon rate. Conversely, if the Bank pays less than the par value or the unpaid principal balance, purchasing the asset at a discount, the discount increases the yield above the coupon rate.

The Bank amortizes premiums and accretes discounts from the acquisition dates of the MBS and mortgage loans. The Bank applies the level-yield method on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the MBS and purchased mortgage loans for which prepayments reasonably can be expected and estimated. This method requires a retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time the Bank changes the estimated life as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the securities. Use of the retrospective method may increase volatility of reported earnings during periods of changing interest rates, and the use of different estimates or assumptions as well as changes in external factors could produce significantly different results.

For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank recognizes accretion or amortization of credit losses previously recorded prior to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to the measurement of credit losses along with the net interest income associated with the securities’ effective yield in net interest income in the Statements of Income. For securities classified as HTM, the previously recorded credit losses in AOCI are accreted to the carrying value of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security is subsequently sold or there are additional decreases in cash flows expected to be collected). For securities classified as AFS, the Bank does not accrete the previously recorded credit losses in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities is fair value. The total accretion or amortization associated with the previously recorded credit losses was $70 million and $70 million, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Bank updates its estimate of future expected cash flows for previously other-than-temporarily impaired securities on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairment on the security, any improvement in expected cash flows is accreted into interest income. This accretion, included in the total accretion or amortization amounts above, totaled $51 million and $59 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
77

As a result of the improvements in expected cash flows and resulting decreases in estimated lifetime losses, the Bank has recognized significant amounts of accretion-related income since 2015. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank estimates that it will accrete approximately $139 million of additional interest income associated with the reduction in previously recorded credit losses over the life of the securities. The net accretion of income is likely to continue to be a positive source of net interest income in future periods until the associated MBS mature. Expected maturities of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the underlying obligations. This estimate of accretion of additional interest income and effect on future interest income is a forward-looking statement. The Bank updates its estimates on an ongoing basis, and actual results may differ materially from the Bank’s current estimation.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance and Interpretations

See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2 – Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance” for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and interpretations.


Recent Developments

There are no recent developments for the fourth quarter 2017of 2021 that are expected to have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations or that are otherwise material to the Bank.

100



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Commitments

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Commitments

In accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, each FHLBank, including the Bank, is jointly and severally liable for the FHLBank System’s consolidated obligations issued under Section 11(a) of the FHLBank Act, and in accordance with the FHLBank Act, each FHLBank, including the Bank, is jointly and severally liable for consolidated obligations issued under Section 11(c) of the FHLBank Act. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor.

The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $1,034.3 billion at December 31, 2017, and $989.3 billion at December 31, 2016. The par value of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligations was $115.6 billion at December 31, 2017, and $83.7 billion at December 31, 2016. The Bank had committed to the issuance of $729 million and $1.5 billion in consolidated obligations at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In addition, in the ordinary course of business, the Bank engages in financial transactions that, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, are not recorded on the Bank’s Statement of Condition or may be recorded on the Bank’s Statement of Condition in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transactions. For example, the Bank routinely enters into commitments to extend advances and issues standby letters of credit. These commitments and standby letters of credit may represent future cash requirements of the Bank, although the standby letters of credit usually expire without being drawn upon. Standby letters of credit are subject to the same underwriting and collateral requirements as advances made by the Bank. At December 31, 2017, the Bank had $1 million in advance commitments and $16.2 billion in standby letters of credit outstanding. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $6 million in advance commitments and $15.2 billion in standby letters of credit outstanding.

For additional information, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Bank’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017, except for obligations associated with short-term discount notes. Additional information with respect to the Bank’s consolidated obligations is presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 12 – Consolidated Obligations” and “Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

In addition, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital” includes a discussion of the Bank’s mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 16 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans” includes a discussion of the Bank’s pension and retirement expenses and commitments.

The Bank enters into derivative financial instruments, which create contractual obligations, as part of the Bank’s market risk management. “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities” includes additional information regarding derivative financial instruments.


101



Contractual Obligations
          
(In millions)         
December 31, 2017         
 Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations< 1 Year
 1 to < 3 Years
 3 to < 5 Years
 ≥ 5 Years
 Total
Long-term debt$69,734
 $9,246
 $4,052
 $2,076
 $85,108
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock
 306
 
 3
 309
Capital leases2
 4
 3
 
 9
Operating leases5
 6
 
 
 11
Pension and post-retirement contributions3
 5
 7
 15
 30
Commitments to fund/purchase mortgage loans16
 
 
 
 16
Total contractual obligations$69,760
 $9,567
 $4,062
 $2,094
 $85,483

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Risk Management – Market Risk.”

78
102




ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


103
79





Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Bank's financial reporting. The Bank’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There are inherent limitations in the ability of internal control over financial reporting to provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. These inherent limitations include the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, however, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, although not eliminate, this risk.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Bank'sBank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2021. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The effectiveness of the Bank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Bank's independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report appearing on the following page, which expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Bank'sBank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2021.



104
80



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and Shareholders of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco:

Francisco
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statements of condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the “FHLBank”) as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the related statements of income, comprehensive income, capital accounts and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the FHLBank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the FHLBank as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the FHLBank maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The FHLBank’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the FHLBank’s financial statements and on the FHLBank’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the FHLBank in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,

105



accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
81

assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Interest Rate-Related Derivatives and Hedged Items
As described in Notes 14 and 15 to the financial statements, the FHLBank uses derivatives to reduce funding costs and to manage its exposure to interest rate risks. The total notional amount of derivatives as of December 31, 2021 was $64 billion, of which 50% were designated as hedging instruments, and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021 was $8 million and $5 million, respectively. The fair values of interest rate-related derivatives and hedged items are estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow models that use market-observable inputs, such as swap rates and volatility assumptions.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of interest rate-related derivatives and hedged items is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in evaluating the swap rates and volatility assumptions used to fair value these derivatives and hedged items, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of interest rate-related derivatives and hedged items, including controls over the models, data, and assumptions. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent range of prices for a sample of interest rate-related derivatives and hedged items and comparison of management’s estimate to the independently developed ranges. Developing the independent range of prices involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management and independently developing the swap rates and volatility assumptions.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 9, 2018

4, 2022
We have served as the FHLBank’s auditor since 1990.



106
82




Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Condition


(In millions-except par value)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Assets:
Cash and due from banks$55 $174 
Interest-bearing deposits1,125 1,078 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell15,500 7,250 
Federal funds sold5,348 1,880 
Trading securities(a)
252 4,260 
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities, net of allowance for credit losses of $17 and $21, respectively (amortized cost of $10,009 and $15,456, respectively)(b)
10,332 15,679 
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities (fair values were $3,235 and $5,115, respectively)(a)
3,211 5,081 
Advances (includes $1,772 and $2,147 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)17,027 30,976 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $1 and $4, respectively980 1,935 
Accrued interest receivable45 82 
Derivative assets, net
Other assets238 236 
Total Assets$54,121 $68,634 
Liabilities:
Deposits$769 $887 
Consolidated obligations:
Bonds (includes $627 and $111 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)22,716 44,408 
Discount notes23,987 16,213 
Total consolidated obligations46,703 60,621 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock
Accrued interest payable33 24 
Affordable Housing Program (AHP) payable115 120 
Derivative liabilities, net12 
Other liabilities269 774 
Total Liabilities47,897 62,440 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)00
Capital:
Capital stock—Class B—Putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding:
21 shares and 23 shares, respectively2,061 2,284 
Unrestricted retained earnings3,124 2,919 
Restricted retained earnings708 761 
Total Retained Earnings3,832 3,680 
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI)331 230 
Total Capital6,224 6,194 
Total Liabilities and Capital$54,121 $68,634 
(In millions-except par value)December 31,
2017

 December 31,
2016

Assets:   
Cash and due from banks$31
 $2
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 590
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 15,500
Federal funds sold11,028
 4,214
Trading securities(a)
1,164
 2,066
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities(a)
3,833
 4,489
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities (fair values were $14,704 and $14,141, respectively)(a)
14,680
 14,127
Advances (includes $6,431 and $3,719 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)77,382
 49,845
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $0 and $0, respectively2,076
 826
Accrued interest receivable119
 79
Premises, software, and equipment, net29
 33
Derivative assets, net83
 66
Other assets95
 104
Total Assets$123,385
 $91,941
Liabilities:   
Deposits$281
 $169
Consolidated obligations:   
Bonds (includes $949 and $1,507 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)85,063
 50,224
Discount notes30,440
 33,506
Total consolidated obligations115,503
 83,730
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock309
 457
Borrowings from other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks)
 1,345
Accrued interest payable116
 67
Affordable Housing Program (AHP) payable204
 205
Derivative liabilities, net1
 2
Other liabilities165
 429
Total Liabilities116,579
 86,404
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 20)


Capital:   
Capital stock—Class B—Putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding:   
32 shares and 24 shares, respectively3,243
 2,370
Unrestricted retained earnings2,670
 888
Restricted retained earnings575
 2,168
Total Retained Earnings3,245
 3,056
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI)318
 111
Total Capital6,806
 5,537
Total Liabilities and Capital$123,385
 $91,941
(a)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, NaN of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged.

(a)At December 31, 2017 and 2016, none of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged.

(b)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, $252 and $379, respectively, of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

83
107



Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Income


For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
(In millions)202120202019
Interest Income:     Interest Income:
Advances$874
 $477
 $291
Advances$193 $565 $1,674 
Prepayment fees on advances, net1
 5
 8
Prepayment fees on advances, net31 33 
Interest-bearing deposits8
 2
 
Interest-bearing deposits15 51 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell9
 12
 3
Securities purchased under agreements to resell20 174 
Federal funds sold115
 29
 9
Federal funds sold17 114 
Trading securities17
 10
 5
Trading securities61 83 15 
AFS securities239
 262
 264
AFS securities220 243 394 
HTM securities285
 251
 293
HTM securities43 109 270 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio52
 30
 33
Mortgage loans held for portfolio42 34 87 
Total Interest Income1,600
 1,078
 906
Total Interest Income598 1,119 2,782 
Interest Expense:     Interest Expense:
Consolidated obligations:     Consolidated obligations:
Bonds713
 410
 317
Bonds62 437 1,631 
Discount notes285
 136
 46
Discount notes13 169 599 
Deposits3
 1
 1
Deposits
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock32
 60
 65
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock— 14 
Total Interest Expense1,033
 607
 429
Total Interest Expense76 614 2,251 
Net Interest Income567
 471
 477
Net Interest Income522 505 531 
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 
 1
Net Interest Income After Mortgage Loan Loss Provision567
 471
 476
Provision for/(reversal of) credit lossesProvision for/(reversal of) credit losses(6)26 — 
Net Interest Income After Provision for/(Reversal of) Credit LossesNet Interest Income After Provision for/(Reversal of) Credit Losses528 479 531 
Other Income/(Loss):     Other Income/(Loss):
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) loss(10) (26) (31)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI(6) 10
 16
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(16) (16) (15)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities
 4
 (2)Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(57)15 (2)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(31) (40) (50)Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(54)85 101 
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities(14) 9
 (16)
Gains on litigation settlements, net119
 510
 459
Other20
 18
 12
Net gain/(loss) on derivativesNet gain/(loss) on derivatives37 (152)(92)
Gain on disgorgement settlementGain on disgorgement settlement— 85 — 
Standby letters of credit feesStandby letters of credit fees16 20 19 
Other, netOther, net(5)
Total Other Income/(Loss)78
 485
 388
Total Other Income/(Loss)(50)59 21 
Other Expense:     Other Expense:
Compensation and benefits76
 74
 67
Compensation and benefits93 88 84 
Other operating expense70
 74
 71
Other operating expense54 60 73 
Federal Housing Finance Agency6
 6
 6
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Office of Finance5
 4
 4
Office of Finance
Quality Jobs Fund expense60
 
 
Quality Jobs Fund expense— — 15 
Other7
 
 
Other, netOther, net(1)
Total Other Expense224
 158
 148
Total Other Expense159 165 187 
Income/(Loss) Before Assessment421
 798
 716
Income/(Loss) Before Assessment319 373 365 
AHP Assessment45
 86
 78
AHP Assessment32 38 38 
Net Income/(Loss)$376
 $712
 $638
Net Income/(Loss)$287 $335 $327 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


108
84



Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Comprehensive Income


 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
Net Income/(Loss)$376
 $712
 $638
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss):     
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits3
 (2) (2)
Net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on AFS securities:     
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred from HTM securities
 
 (1)
Net change in fair value of other-than-temporarily impaired securities195
 103
 (29)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)6
 (10) (15)
Total net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on AFS securities201
 93
 (45)
Net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on HTM securities:     
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)
 
 (1)
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss3
 5
 6
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred to AFS securities
 
 1
Total net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on HTM securities3
 5
 6
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)207
 96
 (41)
Total Comprehensive Income/(Loss)$583
 $808
 $597

For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202120202019
Net Income/(Loss)$287 $335 $327 
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss):
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities96 (45)53 
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits— 
Net non-credit-related gain/(loss) on AFS securities— — (19)
Net non-credit-related gain/(loss) on HTM securities— 
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)101 (44)39 
Total Comprehensive Income/(Loss)$388 $291 $366 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


109
85



Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Capital Accounts

Capital Stock
Class B—Putable
 Retained Earnings   
Total
Capital

Capital Stock
Class B—Putable
Retained EarningsTotal
Capital
(In millions)Shares
 Par Value
 Restricted
 Unrestricted
 Total
 AOCI
 (In millions)SharesPar ValueRestrictedUnrestrictedTotalAOCI
Balance, December 31, 201433
 $3,278
 $2,065
 $294
 $2,359
 $56
 $5,693
Balance, December 31, 2018Balance, December 31, 201829 $2,949 $647 $2,699 $3,346 $235 $6,530 
Comprehensive income/(loss)Comprehensive income/(loss)66 261 327 39 366 
Issuance of capital stockIssuance of capital stock12 1,186 1,186 
Repurchase of capital stockRepurchase of capital stock(11)(1,129)(1,129)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, netCapital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net— (6)(6)
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (7.00%)Cash dividends paid on capital stock (7.00%)(206)(206)(206)
Balance, December 31, 2019Balance, December 31, 201930 $3,000 $713 $2,754 $3,467 $274 $6,741 
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting changeAdjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change(3)(3)(3)
Comprehensive income/(loss)Comprehensive income/(loss)48 287 335 (44)291 
Issuance of capital stockIssuance of capital stock789 789 
Repurchase of capital stockRepurchase of capital stock(15)(1,465)(1,465)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, netCapital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net— (40)(40)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing CorporationPartial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation40 40 40 
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (5.53%)Cash dividends paid on capital stock (5.53%)(159)(159)(159)
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 202023 $2,284 $761 $2,919 $3,680 $230 $6,194 
Comprehensive income/(loss)    103
 535
 638
 (41) 597
Comprehensive income/(loss)— 287 287 101 388 
Issuance of capital stock8
 829
         829
Issuance of capital stock14 1,409 1,409 
Repurchase of capital stock(14) (1,439)         (1,439)Repurchase of capital stock(16)(1,607)(1,607)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(4) (415)         (415)Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net— (25)(25)
Transfers from restricted retained earnings    (150) 150
 
   
Transfers from restricted retained earnings(53)53 — — 
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (12.39%)      (369) (369)   (369)
Balance, December 31, 201523
 $2,253
 $2,018
 $610
 $2,628
 $15
 $4,896
Comprehensive income/(loss)    150
 562
 712
 96
 808
Issuance of capital stock9
 926
         926
Repurchase of capital stock(7) (753)         (753)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(1) (56)         (56)
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (12.33%)      (284) (284)   (284)
Balance, December 31, 201624
 $2,370
 $2,168
 $888
 $3,056
 $111
 $5,537
Comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 178
 198
 376
 207
 583
Issuance of capital stock12
 1,214
 
 
   
 1,214
Repurchase of capital stock(4) (339) 
 
   
 (339)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net
 (2) 

 

   

 (2)
Transfers from restricted retained earnings
 

 (1,771) 1,771
 
 
 
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (7.50%)
 

 
 (187) (187) 
 (187)
Balance, December 31, 201732
 $3,243
 $575
 $2,670
 $3,245
 $318
 $6,806
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (5.74%)Cash dividends paid on capital stock (5.74%)(135)(135)(135)
Balance, December 31, 2021Balance, December 31, 202121 $2,061 $708 $3,124 $3,832 $331 $6,224 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

86
110




Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income/(Loss)$287 $335 $327 
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization/(accretion)79 35 (53)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses(6)26 — 
Change in net fair value of trading securities57 (15)
Change in net fair value adjustment on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option54 (85)(101)
Change in net derivatives and hedging activities531 (1,073)(319)
Other adjustments, net23 
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable39 62 (3)
Other assets(12)(19)(23)
Accrued interest payable(140)
Other liabilities(4)(34)(5)
Total adjustments754 (1,235)(478)
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities1,041 (900)(151)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net change in:
Interest-bearing deposits(52)1,497 165 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(8,250)(250)300 
Federal funds sold(3,468)1,682 283 
Trading securities:
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns3,951 656 
Purchases— (2,480)(1,763)
AFS securities:
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns8,797 2,853 616 
Purchases(4,275)(2,025)(8,739)
HTM securities:
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns1,868 2,466 3,549 
Advances:
Repaid257,403 494,273 1,258,362 
Originated(243,923)(459,523)(1,249,955)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:
Principal collected958 1,777 968 
Purchases(7)(463)(1,253)
Other investing activities, net— (3)(38)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities13,002 39,805 3,151 
87
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net Income/(Loss)$376
 $712
 $638
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization(62) (82) (80)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 
 1
Change in net fair value of trading securities
 (4) 2
Change in net fair value adjustment on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option31
 40
 50
Change in net derivatives and hedging activities(8) (24) (33)
Net OTTI loss, credit-related16
 16
 15
Net change in:     
Accrued interest receivable(45) (22) 16
Other assets6
 (21) (9)
Accrued interest payable50
 (17) (20)
Other liabilities(22) (16) 109
Total adjustments(34) (130) 51
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities342
 582
 689
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Net change in:     
Interest-bearing deposits(514) 294
 (404)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell3,750
 (5,500) (9,000)
Federal funds sold(6,814) 412
 2,877
Premises, software, and equipment(12) (13) (12)
Trading securities:     
Proceeds from maturities of long-term902
 277
 2,339
Purchases of long-term
 (1,155) 
AFS securities:     
Proceeds from maturities of long-term933
 1,104
 996
HTM securities:     
Net (increase)/decrease in short-term850
 (1,350) 
Proceeds from maturities of long-term3,240
 2,927
 2,746
Purchases of long-term(4,901) (4,639) 
Advances:     
Repaid1,575,597
 1,414,120
 1,057,469
Originated(1,603,226) (1,413,136) (1,069,480)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:     
Principal collected184
 175
 184
Purchases(1,413) (343) (131)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets3
 3
 4
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities(31,421) (6,824) (12,412)



111




Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
(In millions)202120202019
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net change in deposits and other financing activities114
 (923) 262
Net change in deposits and other financing activities(20)375 256 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks(1,345) 1,345
 
Net change in borrowings from other Federal Home Loan BanksNet change in borrowings from other Federal Home Loan Banks— — (250)
Net (payments)/proceeds on derivative contracts with financing elements
 9
 17
Net (payments)/proceeds on derivative contracts with financing elements(35)(167)82 
Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:     Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:
Bonds80,506
 40,041
 38,935
Bonds17,888 54,657 75,458 
Discount notes165,408
 136,608
 106,536
Discount notes78,977 111,474 144,800 
Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations: 
   Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations:
Bonds(45,622)
(41,514) (33,968)Bonds(39,417)(81,633)(76,433)
Discount notes(168,491)
(130,761) (100,717)Discount notes(71,198)(122,584)(146,564)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock1,214

926
 829
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock1,409 789 1,186 
Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(150)
(87) (646)Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(24)(176)(95)
Payments for repurchase of capital stock(339) (753) (1,439)Payments for repurchase of capital stock(1,607)(1,465)(1,129)
Cash dividends paid(187)
(284) (369)Cash dividends paid(135)(159)(206)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing CorporationPartial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation— 40 — 
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities31,108

4,607
 9,440
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities(14,162)(38,849)(2,895)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks29

(1,635) (2,283)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks(119)56 105 
Cash and due from banks at beginning of the period2
 1,637
 3,920
Cash and due from banks at beginning of the period174 118 13 
Cash and due from banks at end of the period$31

$2
 $1,637
Cash and due from banks at end of the period$55 $174 $118 
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:
Interest paid$990
 $578
 $412
Interest paid$94 $753 $2,289 
AHP payments53
 53
 53
AHP payments37 70 70 
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:     Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Transfers of mortgage loans to real estate owned1
 1
 2
Transfers of other-than-temporarily impaired HTM securities to AFS securities
 
 15
Transfers of HTM securities to AFS securitiesTransfers of HTM securities to AFS securities
Transfers of capital stock to mandatorily redeemable capital stock2
 56
 415
Transfers of capital stock to mandatorily redeemable capital stock25 40 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

88
112


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements






(Dollars in millions except per share amounts)


Background Information


The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank), a federally chartered corporation exempt from ordinary federal, state, and local taxation except real property taxes, is one of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). The FHLBanks are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community development by providing a readily available, competitively priced source of funds to their member institutions. Each FHLBank is operated as a separate entity with its own management, employees, and board of directors. The Bank does not have any special purpose entities or any other type of off-balance sheet conduits. The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure. Regulated financial depositories and insurance companies engaged in residential housing finance, with principal places of business located in Arizona, California, and Nevada, are eligible to apply for membership. In addition, authorized community development financial institutions are eligible to be members of the Bank. All members are required to purchase capital stock in the Bank. State and local housing authorities that meet certain statutory criteria may also borrow from the Bank. While eligible to borrow, these housing authorities are not members of the Bank, and, as such, are not required to hold capital stock. To access the Bank'sBank’s products and services, a financial institution must be approved for membership and purchase capital stock in the Bank. The member's capital stock requirement is generally based on its use of Bank products, subject to a minimum asset-based membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having ready access to the Bank as a reliable source of competitively priced funds. Bank capital stock is issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. It is not publicly traded. All shareholders may receive dividends on their capital stock, to the extent declared by the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directors.directors.


The Bank conducts business with members in the ordinary course of business. See Note 2117 – Transactions with Certain Members, Certain Nonmembers, and Other FHLBanks for more information.


The Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), an independent federal agency in the executive branch of the United States government, supervises and regulates the FHLBanks and the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ Office of Finance.


The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks that facilitates the issuance and servicing of the debt instruments (consolidated obligations) of the FHLBanks and prepares the combined quarterly and annual financial reports of the FHLBanks.


The primary source of funds for the FHLBanks is the proceeds from the sale to the public of the FHLBanks'FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance using authorized securities dealers. As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. Other funds are provided by deposits, other borrowings, and the issuance of capital stock to members. The Bank primarily uses these funds to provide advances to members.


Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates, and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income, expenses, gains, and losses during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates include estimating the allowance for credit losses on the advances and mortgage loan portfolios; include:
89

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




accounting for derivatives;
estimating fair values of investments classified as trading and available-for-sale (AFS), derivatives and associated hedged items carried at fair value in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and associated hedging activities, and financial instruments carried at fair value under the fair value option, and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) for investmentoption;

and
113


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



securities; and estimating the prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage loans for the accounting of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts and credit losses previously recorded prior to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to the measurement of credit losses on MBS and mortgage loans.
Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Estimated Fair Values. Many of the Bank'sBank’s financial instruments lack an available liquid trading market as characterized by frequent exchange transactions between a willing buyer and willing seller. Therefore, the Bank uses financial models employing significant assumptions and present value calculations for the purpose of determining estimated fair values. Thus, the fair values may not represent the actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of yearend or that will be realized in the future.

Fair values for certain financial instruments are based on quoted prices, market rates, or replacement rates for similar financial instruments as of the last business day of the year. The estimated fair values of the Bank'sBank’s financial instruments and related assumptions are detailed in Note 1915 – Fair Value.

Interest-bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell. Resell, and Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold. These investments provide short-term liquidity and are carried at cost. The Bank invests in Federal Funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality. Interest-bearing deposits include interest-bearing deposits in banks not meeting the definition of a security. Interest income on these investments is accrued as earned and recorded in interest income on the Statements of Income. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition.
These investments are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If applicable, an allowance for credit loss is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for/(reversal of) credit losses. The Bank treats securities purchased under agreements to resell as collateralized financing arrangements because they effectively represent short-term loans to counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, which are classified as assets in the Statements of Condition. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank by third-party custodians approved by the Bank. In accordance with the terms of these loans, if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreementConsequently, a credit loss would be recognized if there is a collateral shortfall which the Bank does not believe the counterparty will replenish in accordance with its contractual terms. The credit loss would be limited to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost ofinvestment’s cost.
See Note 4 – Investments for details on the agreement is chargedallowance methodologies relating to earnings.

Federal Funds Sold. These investments provide short-term liquidityinterest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and are carried at cost. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality.sold.

Interest-bearing Deposits. This investment provides short-term liquidity and is carried at cost. Interest-bearing deposits includeinterest-bearing deposits in banks not meeting the definition of a security. Interest income on interest-bearing deposits is accrued as earned and recorded in interest income on the Statements of Income.

Investment Securities. The Bank classifies investments as trading, available-for-sale (AFS),AFS, or held-to-maturity (HTM) at the date of acquisition. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis.

The Bank classifies certain investments as trading. These securities are held for liquidity purposes and carried at fair value with changes in the fair value of these investments recorded in other income.income/(loss). The Bank does not participate in speculative trading practices and holds these investments indefinitely as the Bank periodically evaluates its liquidity needs.

90

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The Bank classifies certain securities as AFS and carries these securities at their fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).

HTM securities are carried at cost, adjusted for periodic principal repayments;repayments, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts;discounts, and previous OTTIcredit loss recognized in net income and AOCI.AOCI recorded prior to January 1, 2020. The Bank classifies these investments as HTM securities because the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities until maturity.

Certain changes in circumstances may cause the Bank to change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. Thus, the sale or transfer of an HTM security because of certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness or changes in regulatory requirements, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. Other events that are isolated, nonrecurring, and unusual for the Bank

114


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



that could not have been reasonably anticipated may cause the Bank to sell or transfer an HTM security without necessarily calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity. In addition, sales of debt securities that meet either of the following two conditions may be considered as maturities for purposes of the classification of securities: (i) the sale occurs near enough to its maturity date (or call date if exercise of the call is probable) that interest rate risk is substantially eliminated as a pricing factor and changes in market interest rates would not have a significant effect on the security's fair value, or (ii) the sale occurs after the Bank has already collected a substantial portion (at least 85%) of the principal outstanding at acquisition because of prepayments on the debt security or scheduled payments on a debt security payable in equal installments (both principal and interest) over its term.

The Bank calculates the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts on investments using the level-yield method on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the securities. This method requires a retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time the Bank changes the estimated life as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the securities. The Bank uses nationally recognized, market-based, third-party prepayment models to project estimated lives.

On a quarterly basis, the Bank evaluates its individual AFS and HTM investment securities in an unrealized loss position for OTTI.impairment. A security is considered impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. For impaired debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether: (i) it has the intent to sell the debt security; (ii) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis of the security; or (iii) it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired debt security. If any of these conditions is met, an OTTI on the security must be recognized.

With respect to any debt security, a credit loss is defined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. If a credit loss exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying valueprovision for/(reversal of) credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the debtunrealized loss. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.
If management intends to sell an impaired security classified as AFS, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before expected recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is adjusted to its fair value. However, instead of recognizing the entire difference betweenwritten off and the amortized cost basis andis written down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings onlyas net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities. If management does not intend to sell an impaired security classified as AFS and it is not more likely than not that management will be required to sell the amountdebt security, then the credit portion of the impairment representing the credit lossdifference is recognized in earnings, whileas an allowance for credit losses and any remaining difference between the amount of non-credit-related impairmentsecurity’s fair value and amortized cost is recognized in AOCI. The total OTTI is presented in the Statements of Income with an offset for the amountrecorded to net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities within other comprehensive income/(loss).
Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the total OTTI that is recognized in AOCI. This presentation provides additional information about the amounts that the entity does not expect to collect related to a debt security. The credit loss on a debtAFS security is limited to the amount of that security's unrealized losses.

For subsequent accounting of other-than-temporarily impaired securities, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the Bank records an additional OTTI. The amount of total OTTI for a security that was previously impaired is calculated as the difference between its amortized cost less the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI prior to the determination of OTTI and its faircarrying value. For an other-than-temporarily impaired security that was previously impaired and has subsequently incurred an additional OTTI related to credit loss (limited to that security's unrealized losses), this additional credit-related OTTI, up to the amountimprovements in AOCI, would be reclassified out of non-credit-related OTTI in AOCI and charged to earnings. Any credit loss in excess of the related AOCI is charged to earnings.

Subsequent related increases and decreases (if not an OTTI) in the fair valuecash flows of AFS securities, will be netted againstinterest income follows the non-credit component of OTTI previously recognized in AOCI.

For securities classified as HTM, the OTTI recognized in AOCI is accretedrecognition pattern pursuant to the carrying valueimpairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020, and recoveries of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security is subsequently sold or thereamounts previously written off are additional decreases in cash flows expected to be collected). For securities classified as AFS, the Bank does not accrete the OTTI recognized in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities is fair value.

115
91


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







recorded when received. AFS securities with a credit loss recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020, continue to follow the prior accounting until maturity or disposition. For improvements in impaired AFS securities with an allowance for credit losses recognized after the adoption of the new guidance, the allowance for credit losses associated with recoveries may be derecognized up to its full amount. Effective January 1, 2020, the net non-credit-related other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) gain/(loss) on AFS securities was reclassified to net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities within other comprehensive income/(loss).

For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired,On a quarterly basis, the Bank updatesevaluates its estimate of future estimated cash flowsHTM investment securities for expected credit losses on a regular basis.pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If therenecessary, an allowance for credit losses is no additional impairmentrecorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for/(reversal of) credit losses. Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the HTM security carrying value. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the security, any improvement in expected cash flows is accreted into interest income in the Statements of Income.Condition. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.

For improvements in HTM securities impaired prior to January 1, 2020, interest income continues to follow the recognition pattern pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020, and recoveries of amounts previously written off are recorded when received. For improvements in impaired HTM securities with an allowance for credit losses recognized after the adoption of the new guidance, the allowance for credit losses associated with recoveries may be derecognized up to its full amount.
See Note 4 – Investments for details on the allowance methodologies relating to AFS and HTM securities.
Financial Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements. The Bank presents certain financial instruments, including derivative instruments and securities purchased under agreements to resell, on a net basis when they have a legal right of offset and all other requirements for netting are met (collectively referred to as the netting requirements). The Bank has elected to offset its derivative asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral received or pledged, when the netting requirements are met. The Bank did not have any offsetting liabilities related to its securities purchased under agreements to resell for the periods presented.

The net exposure for these financial instruments can change on a daily basis; therefore, there may be a delay between the time this exposure change is identified and additional collateral is requested, and the time this collateral is received or pledged. Likewise, there may be a delay for excess collateral to be returned. For derivative instruments that meet the netting requirements, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset. Additional information regarding these agreements is provided in Note 1814 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities. Based on the fair value of the related collateral held, the securities purchased under agreements to resell were fully collateralized for the periods presented.

Variable Interest Entities. The Bank’s investments in variable interest entities (VIEs) are limited to private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS). On an ongoing basis, the Bank performs a quarterly evaluation
to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary in any VIE. The Bank evaluated its investments in VIEs as of December 31, 2017,2021, to determine whether it is a primary beneficiary of any of these investments. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate a VIE. The Bank determined that consolidation accounting is not required because the Bank is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs for the periods presented. The Bank does not have the power to significantly affect the economic performance of any of these investments because it does not act as a key decision maker nor does it have the unilateral ability to replace a key decision maker. In addition, the Bank does not design, sponsor, transfer, service, or provide credit or liquidity support in any of its investments in VIEs. The Bank’s maximum loss exposure for these investments is limited to the carrying value.

Advances. The Bank reports advances (loans to members, former members or their successors or housing associates) either at amortized cost or at fair value when the fair value option is elected. Advances carried at amortized cost are reported net of premiums, discounts (including discounts related to the Affordable Housing
92

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Program), and hedging adjustments. The Bank amortizes premiums and accretes discounts and recognizes hedging adjustments resulting from the discontinuation of a hedging relationship to interest income using a level-yield methodology. Interest on advances is credited to income as earned. For advances carried at fair value, the Bank recognizes contractual interest in interest income. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. The advances carried at amortized cost are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for/(reversal of) credit losses.

See Note 5 – Advances for details on the allowance methodologies relating to advances.
Advance Modifications. In cases in which the Bank funds an advance concurrent with or within a short period of time before or after the prepayment of a previous advance to the same member, the Bank evaluates whetherat market rates, the subsequent advance meets the accounting criteria to qualifyis accounted for as a new advance. The Bank does not issue advances at non-market rates. If a member makes a request for a modification ofto an existing advance, or whether it constitutes a new advance. Thethe Bank compares the present value of the cash flows on the subsequentmodified advance to the present value of the cash flows remaining on the previousoriginal advance. If there is at leastless than a 10% difference in the present value of the cash flows or if the Bank concludes that the difference between the advances is not more than minor based on a qualitative assessment of the modifications made to the previous advance's contractual terms, then the subsequent advance is accounted for as a new advance. In all other instances,modification. Modification requests with a difference in cash flows that is more than minor are not accepted by the subsequent advance is accounted for as a modification.Bank.

Prepayment Fees. When a borrower prepays certain advances prior to the original maturity, the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee. For certain advances with full or partial prepayment symmetry, the Bank may charge the

116


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid.

The Bank no longer offers advances with partial prepayment symmetry.
For prepaid advances that are hedged and meet the hedge accounting requirements, the Bank terminates the hedging relationship upon prepayment and records the associated fair value gains and losses, adjusted for the prepayment fees, in interest income. If a new advance represents a modification of an original hedged advance, the fair value gains or losses on the advance and the prepayment fees are included in the carrying amount of the modified advance, and gains or losses and prepayment fees are amortized in interest income over the life of the modified advance using the level-yield method. If the modified advance is also hedged and the hedge meets the hedge accounting requirements, the modified advance is marked to fair value after the modification, and subsequent fair value changes are recorded in other income.interest income on advances. If the prepayment represents an extinguishment of the original hedged advance, the prepayment fee and any fair value gain or loss are immediately recognized in interest income.

For prepaid advances that are not hedged or that are hedged but do not meet the hedge accounting requirements, the Bank records prepayment fees in interest income unless the Bank determines that the new advance represents a modification of the original advance. If the new advance represents a modification of the original advance, the prepayment fee on the original advance is deferred, recorded in the basis of the modified advance, and amortized over the life of the modified advance using the level-yield method. This amortization is recorded in interest income.

Mortgage Loans Held infor Portfolio. Under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program, the Bank may purchasepurchased from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate residential mortgage loans under the MPF Original product andproduct. In addition, the Bank facilitated the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from its participating members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF GovernmentXtra® product. When members sold loans under the MPF Xtra product, the loans were sold to a third-party investor and were not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance”Finance,” “MPF,” and “MPF”“MPF Xtra” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.) On December 17, 2020, the Bank announced that it would no longer offer new commitments to directly purchase, or to facilitate the purchase of, mortgage loans from its members. On March 31, 2021, the Bank closed all
93

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




remaining open commitments to purchase mortgage loans for its own portfolio under the MPF Original product, and by June 30, 2021, the Bank no longer facilitated the purchase of mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra product.
Participating members originateoriginated or purchasepurchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhancecredit-enhanced them and sellsold them to the Bank, and generally retainretained the servicing of the loans. Unlike conventional MPF products held for portfolio, participating members are not required to provide credit enhancement and do not receive credit enhancement fees under the MPF Xtra product. The Bank manages the interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and liquidity risk of each loan in its portfolio. The Bank and the participating financial institution (either the original participating member that sold the loans to the Bank or a successor to that member) share in the credit risk of the loans by structuring potential losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each master commitment, as follows:
(1)The first layer of protection against loss is the Bank assumingliquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
(2)The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
(3)Losses that exceed the liquidation value of the real property and any primary mortgage insurance, up to an agreed-upon amount called the first loss account for each master commitment, are incurred by the Bank.
(4)Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to an agreed-upon amount called the credit enhancement amount, are covered by the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement obligation limited byat the time losses are incurred.
(5)Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution assuminginstitution’s remaining credit losses in excess ofenhancement for the first loss account, up tomaster commitment, if any, are incurred by the amountBank.
Under the MPF Program, the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement protection consists of the credit enhancement amount, which may be a direct obligation specified inof the master agreement.participating financial institution or may be a supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) policy paid for by the participating financial institution, and may include a contingent performance-based credit enhancement fee payable to the participating financial institution. The participating financial institution is required to pledge collateral to secure any portion of its credit enhancement amount that is a direct obligation. The amount of the credit enhancement is calculated so that any Bank credit losses (excluding special hazard losses) in excess of the first loss account are limited to those that would be expected from an equivalent investment with a long-term credit rating of AA for loans purchased prior to April 2017 and BBB for loans purchased thereafter, as determined by the MPF Program methodology.

In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. (“MPF Xtra” is a registered trademark of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution or any successor a credit enhancement fee, typically 10 basis points per annum, which is calculated on the remaining unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. Depending on the specific MPF product, all or a portion of the credit enhancement fee is typically paid monthly beginning with the month after each delivery of loans. The MPF Original product provides participating financial institutions the option to receive credit enhancement fees on a monthly basisover the life of the loans or inas an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. The MPF Plus product provides for a performance-based credit enhancement fee, which accrues

117


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



monthly, beginning with the month after each delivery of loans, and is paid to the participating financial institution beginning 12 months later. The performance-based credit enhancement fee will be reduced by an amount equivalent to loan losses up to the amount of the first loss account established for each master commitment. The participating financial institutions obtain supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI)SMI to cover their credit enhancement obligations under this product. If the SMI provider's claims-paying ability rating falls below a specified level, the participating financial institution has six months to either replace the SMI policy or assume the credit enhancement obligation and fully collateralize the obligation; otherwise the Bank may choose not to pay the participating financial institution its performance-based credit enhancement fee.

The Bank classifies mortgage loans as held for investmentportfolio and, accordingly, reports them at their principal amount outstanding net of unamortized premiums, unamortized credit enhancement fees paid as a lump sum at the time loans are purchased, discounts, and unrealized gains and losses from loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments. The Bank defers and amortizes these amounts as interest income using the level-yield method on a
94

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




retrospective basis over the estimated life of the related mortgage loan. Actual prepayment experience and estimates of future principal prepayments are used in calculating the estimated life of the mortgage loans. The Bank aggregates the mortgage loans by similar characteristics (type, maturity, noteinterest rate, and acquisition date) in determining prepayment estimates. A retrospective adjustment is required each time the Bank changes the estimated amounts as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the assets. The Bank uses nationally recognized, market-based, third-party prepayment models to project estimated lives.

The Bank recordsperforms a quarterly assessment of its mortgage loans held for portfolio to estimate expected credit enhancement fees as a reduction to interest income.

Allowance for Credit Losses. losses. An allowance for credit losses is recorded with a valuation allowance separately established for each identified portfolio segment, if it is probable that impairment has occurredcorresponding adjustment to the provision for/(reversal of) credit losses. The Bank measures expected credit losses on mortgage loans on a loan-level basis, factoring in the Bank's portfolio as ofcredit enhancement structure at the Statements of Condition date andmaster commitment level.
When developing the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent necessary, an allowance for credit losses, for off-balance sheetthe Bank measures the estimated loss over the remaining life of a mortgage loan, which also considers how the Bank’s credit exposures is recorded as a liability.

Portfolio Segments.A portfolio segment is defined asenhancements mitigate credit losses. The Bank includes estimates of expected recoveries within the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses. The Bank has developed and documentedIf a systematic methodology for determining anloan is purchased at a discount, the discount does not offset the allowance for credit losses for each applicable portfolio segment.

See Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses for more information.

Impairment Methodologylosses. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on Mortgage Loans. Athe Statements of Condition. The allowance excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, as the Bank writes off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income if a mortgage loan is considered impaired when, basedplaced on current informationnonaccrual status.
A past due loan is one where the borrower has failed to make a scheduled full payment of principal and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amountsinterest within 30 days of its due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

Loans that are on non-accrual status and that are considered collateral-dependent are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. Loans are considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, that is, there is no other available and reliable source of repayment. Collateral-dependent loans are impaired if the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated selling costs is insufficient to recover the unpaid principal balance on the loan. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as interest income on non-accrual loans noted below.

date. The Bank places a mortgage loan on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest from the participating financial institution is reported 90 days or more past due or when the loan is in foreclosure. Loans that are on nonaccrual status and that are considered collateral-dependent are measured for credit losses based on the fair value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. Loans are considered collateral-dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be substantially through the sale of the underlying collateral; that is, if it is considered likely that the borrower will default and there is no credit enhancement to offset losses under the master commitment, or the collectability or availability of credit enhancement is deemed to be uncertain. Collateral-dependent loans are credit deteriorated if the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated selling costs is insufficient to recover the unpaid principal balance on the loan.
When a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The Bank records cash payments received on nonaccrual loans first as interest income and then as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement, unless the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful. If the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful, then cash payments received would be applied first solely to principal until the remaining principal amount due is

118


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



expected to be collected and then as a recovery of any charge-off, if applicable, followed by recording interest income. A loan on non-accrualnonaccrual status may be restored to accrual when (1) none of its contractual principal and interest is due and unpaid, and the Bank expects repayment of the remaining contractual interest and principal, or (2) it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection.
Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. An MPF loan considered a TDR that shares similar risk characteristics with other loans is evaluated for credit losses on a collective basis. TDRs that do not share risk characteristics with other loans are individually evaluated for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash flow shortfalls incurred as of the reporting date, as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates, if applicable.
For anyall mortgage loans that are more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less costcosts to sell, thisthe excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy,period.
95

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The Bank does not purchase mortgage loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur.

Real Estate Owned. Real estate owned (REO) includes assets that have been received in satisfaction of debt through foreclosures. REO is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs and is subsequently carriedwith credit deterioration present at the lowertime of that amount or current fair value less estimated selling costs. The Bank recognizes a charge-off topurchase. See Note 6 – Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio for details on the allowance for credit losses if the fair value of the REO less estimated selling costs is less than the recorded investment in the loan at the date of transfer from loansmethodologies relating to REO. Any subsequent realized gains, realized or unrealized losses, and carrying costs are included in other non-interest expense in the Statements of Income. REO is recorded in “Other assets” in the Statements of Condition. At December 31, 2017, the Bank’s other assets included $1 of REO resulting from foreclosure of 11 mortgage loans held by the Bank. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s other assets included $1 of REO resulting from foreclosure of 12 mortgage loans held by the Bank.loans.

Other Fees. Letter of credit fees are recorded as other incomeincome/(loss) over the term of the letter of credit.

Derivatives.Derivatives and Hedging Activities. All derivatives are recognized on the Statements of Condition at their fair value. The Bank has elected to reportvalues and are reported as either derivative assets andor derivative liabilities, net of cash collateral, including initial and variation margin, and accrued interest received from or pledged to futures commission merchants (clearing agents)clearing agents or counterparties. The fair values of derivatives are netted by clearing agent or counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset, and if negative, they are classified as a liability. Cash flows associated with derivatives are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the Statements of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be a financing derivative.

The Bank uses London Clearing House (LCH) Ltd for all cleared derivative transactions. The rulebook of LCH Ltd characterizes variation margin as daily settlement payments, and initial margin is considered cash collateral.
Each derivative is designated as one of the following:
(1)a qualifying hedge of the change in fair value of (i) a recognized asset or liability or (ii) an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge);
(2)a qualifying hedge of (i) a forecasted transaction or (ii) the variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in connection with a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge);
(3)a non-qualifying hedge of an asset or liability for asset-liability management purposes or of certain advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option (an economic hedge); or
(4)a non-qualifying hedge of another derivative (an intermediation hedge) that is offered as a product to members or used to offset other derivatives with nonmember counterparties.

(1)a qualifying hedge of the change in fair value of (i) a recognized asset or liability or (ii) an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge); or
(2)a non-qualifying hedge of an asset or liability for asset-liability management purposes or of certain advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option (an economic hedge).
If hedging relationships meet certain criteria, including but not limited to formal documentation of the hedging relationship and an expectation to be hedge effective, they are eligible for hedge accounting, and the offsetting changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk may be recorded in earnings. The application of hedge accounting generally requires the Bank to evaluate the effectiveness of the hedging relationships at inception and on an ongoing basis and to calculate the changes in fair value of the derivatives and the related hedged items independently. This is known as the “long-haul”long-haul method of hedge accounting. Transactions that meet certain criteria qualify for the “short-cut”short-cut method of hedge accounting, in which an assumption can be made that the change in the fair value of a hedged item, because of changes in the benchmark rate, exactly offsets the change in the value of the related derivative. Under the shortcutshort-cut method, the entire change in fair value of the interest rate swap is considered to be effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged asset or liability.

119


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Derivatives are typically executed at the same time as the hedged item, and the Bank designates the hedged item in a qualifying hedge relationship as of the trade date. In many hedging relationships, the Bank may designate the hedging relationship upon its commitment to disburse an advance or trade a consolidated obligation in which settlement occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. The Bank records the changes in the fair value of the derivatives and the hedged item beginning on the trade date.

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a fair value hedge and is designated as a fair value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability (hedged item) that are attributable to the hedged risk (including changes that reflect lossesgains or gainslosses on firm commitments), are recorded in othernet interest income in the same line as “Net gain/(loss)the earnings effect of the hedged item. Net gains and losses on derivatives and hedging activities.”

Changesactivities for qualifying hedges recorded in thenet interest income include unrealized and realized gains and losses, which include net interest settlements. For AFS securities that have been hedged and qualify as a fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a cash flow hedge, and is designated as a cash flow hedge, to the extent thatBank records the hedge is effective, are recorded in AOCI, a componentportion of capital, until earnings are affected by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged transaction (until the periodic recognition of interest on a variable rate asset or liability is recorded in earnings).

For both fair value and cash flow hedges, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in interest income together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative, differs fromand records the remainder of the change in the fair value of the hedged item orinvestment in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) as “Net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities.” The Bank hedges the variability in thebenchmark risk component of cash flows in a fair value hedge.
96

Changes in the fair value of a derivative designated as an economic hedge or an intermediation hedge are recorded in current period earnings with no fair value adjustment to an asset or liability. An economic hedge is defined as a derivative hedging certain advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option, or hedging specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities, or firm commitments, that does not qualify or was not designated for fair value or cash flow hedge accounting, but is an acceptable hedging strategy under the Bank's risk management program. These economic hedging strategies also comply with Finance Agency regulatory requirements prohibiting speculative hedge transactions. An economic hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability caused by the changes in fair value of the derivatives that are recorded in the Bank's income but are not offset by corresponding changes in the value of the economically hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments. The derivatives used in intermediary activities do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are separately marked to market through earnings. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not significantly affect the operating results of the Bank. Changes in the fair value of these non-qualifying hedges are recorded in other incomeincome/(loss) as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.derivatives.” In addition, the net settlements associated with these non-qualifying hedges are recorded in other incomeincome/(loss) as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.derivatives.” Cash flows associated with these stand-alone derivatives are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the Statements of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be designated as a financing derivative.

The net settlements of interest receivables and payables on derivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or interest expense of the designated underlying hedged item. The net settlements of interest receivables and payables on intermediated derivatives for members and other economic hedges are recognized in other incomeincome/(loss) as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.derivatives.

The Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it determines that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (ii) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; (v) it determines that

120


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate; (vi) a critical term on the hedged item changes; or (vi)(vii) it decides to use the derivative to offset changes in the fair value of other derivatives or instruments carried at fair value.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Bank either terminates the derivative or continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, ceases to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value, and amortizes the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item using a level-yield methodology.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the Bank determines that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge of an existing hedged item, the Bank continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value and reclassifies the AOCI adjustment into earnings when earnings are affected by the existing hedged item (the original forecasted transaction).

Under limited circumstances, when the Bank discontinues cash flow hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period, or within the following two months, but it is probable the transaction will still occur in the future, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in AOCI and is recognized in earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within the following two months, the gains and losses that were recorded in AOCI are recognized immediately in earnings.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, the Bank continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, removing from the Statements of Condition any asset or liability that was recorded to recognize the firm commitment and recording it as a gain or loss in current period earnings.

The Bank may be the primary obligor on consolidated obligations and may make advances in which derivative instruments are embedded. Upon execution of these transactions, the Bank assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the advance or debt (the host contract) and whether a separate, non-embedded instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that: (i) the embedded derivative has economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and (ii) a separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and designated as a stand-alone derivative instrument equivalent to an economic hedge. However, the entire contract is carried on the Statements of Condition at fair value and no portion of the contract is designated as a hedging instrument if the entire contract (the host contract and the embedded derivative) is to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in current period earnings (such as an investment security classified as trading, as well as hybrid financial instruments that are eligible for the fair value option), or if the Bank cannot
97

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative for purposes of separating the derivative from its host contract.

Premises, Software, and Equipment. Premises, software, and equipment are included in Other Assets on the Statement of Condition. The Bank records premises, software, and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.The Bank'sAt December 31, 2021 and 2020, premises, software, and equipment were $32 and $39, respectively, which was net of accumulated depreciation and amortization related to premises, software, and equipment totaledof $74 and $61 at December 31, 2017 and 2016,$76, respectively. Improvements and major renewals are capitalized; ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets ranging from 3 to 10 years, and leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Depreciation and amortization expense was $16$7 for 2017, $122021, $7 for 2016,2020, and $8$9 for 2015.2019.


121


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The cost of computer software developed or obtained for internal use is capitalized and depreciated over future periods. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank had $10 and $17 in unamortized computer software costs respectively. Depreciation of computer software costs charged to expense was $9, $8, and $6 in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Consolidated Obligations. Consolidated obligations are recorded at amortized cost unless the Bank has elected the fair value option, in which case the consolidated obligations are carried at fair value.

Concessions on Consolidated Obligations. Concessions are paid to dealers in connection with the issuance of consolidated obligations for which the Bank is the primary obligor. The amount of the concession is allocated to the Bank by the Office of Finance based on the percentage of the debt issued for which the Bank is the primary obligor. Concessions paid on consolidated obligations designated under the fair value option are expensed as incurred in non-interestother expense. Concessions paid on consolidated obligations not designated under the fair value option are deferred and amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the remaining contractual life or on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the consolidated obligations. Amortization of concessions is included in consolidated obligation interest expense and totaled $6,$5, $13, and $7,$11, in 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

Discounts and Premiums on Consolidated Obligations. The discounts on consolidated obligation discount notes for which the Bank is the primary obligor are amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the term to maturity. The discounts and premiums on consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank is the primary obligor are amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the remaining contractual life or on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the consolidated obligation bonds.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The Bank reclassifies the capital stock subject to redemption from capital to a liability after a member provides the Bank with a written notice of redemption; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity, resulting in the member's shares then meeting the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reflected as interest expense in the Statements of Income. The repayment of these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments (by repurchase or redemption of the shares) is reflected as a financing cash outflow in the Statements of Cash Flows once settled. See Note 1511 – Capital for more information.

If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal or if the Bank allows the transfer of mandatorily redeemable capital stock to a member, the Bank reclassifies mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. The Bank evaluates its off-balance sheet credit exposures on a quarterly basis for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for expected credit losses on these off-balance sheet exposures is recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for/(reversal of) credit losses. See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies for details on the allowance methodologies relating to off-balance sheet credit exposure.
98

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Finance Agency Expenses. The FHLBanks fund a portion of the costs of operating the Finance Agency, and each FHLBank is assessed a proportionate share of those costs. The Finance Agency allocates its expenses and working capital fund among the FHLBanks based on the ratio between each FHLBank's minimum required regulatory capital and the aggregate minimum required regulatory capital of all the FHLBanks.

Office of Finance Expenses. Each FHLBank is assessed a proportionate share of the cost of operating the Office of Finance, which facilitates the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance allocates its operating and capital expenditures among the FHLBanks as follows: (1) two-thirds of the assessment is based on each FHLBank'sFHLBank’s share of total consolidated obligations outstanding, and (2) one-third of the assessment is based on an equal pro rata allocation.

Affordable Housing Program. As more fully discussed in Note 139 – Affordable Housing Program, the FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an Affordable Housing Program (AHP). The Bank charges the

122


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



required funding for the AHP to earnings and establishes a liability. The AHP funds provide subsidies to members to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

GainsGain on Litigation Settlements, Net. Litigation settlement gains, netDisgorgement Settlement. During the third quarter of related legal expenses,2020, the Bank received disgorgement proceeds in the amount of $85 in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action. Disgorgement proceeds are recorded in Other Income/(Loss)other income/(loss) in “Gains“Gain on litigation settlements, net”disgorgement settlement” in the Statements of Income. A litigation settlement gain isDisgorgement proceeds are considered realized and recorded when the Bank receives cash or assets that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash or claims to cash. In addition, a litigation settlement gain is considered realizable and recordedcash, when the Bank enters into a signed agreement that is not subject to appeal, where the counterparty has the ability to pay, and the amount to be received can be reasonably estimated. Prior to being realized or realizable, the Bank considers potential litigation settlement gains to be gain contingencies, and therefore they are not recorded in the Statements of Income. The related legal expenses are contingent-based fees and are only incurred and recorded upon a litigation settlement gain.

Note 2 — Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance

Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. On August 28, 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)The following table provides a summary of recently issued amended guidance to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results ofaccounting standards that may have an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. This guidance requires that, for fair value hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness must be recorded in other comprehensive income. In addition, the amendments include certain targeted improvements to the assessment of hedge effectiveness and permit, among other things, the following:
Measurement of the change in fair value of the hedged item on the basis of the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows determined at hedge inception.
Measurement of the hedged item in a partial-term fair value hedge of interest rate risk by assuming the hedged item has a term that reflects only the designated cash flows being hedged.
Consideration only of how changes in the benchmark interest rate affect a decision to settle a prepayable instrument before its scheduled maturity in calculating the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to interest rate risk.
For a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk of a variable-rate financial instrument, an entity could designate as the hedged risk the variability in cash flows attributable to the contractually specified interest rate.

This guidance becomes effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. The Bank does not intend to adopt this guidance early. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance, and its effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and financial statement disclosures has not yet been determined.statements.

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. On March 30, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. This guidance affects all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities that have an amortized cost basis in excess of the amount that is repayable by the issuer at the earliest call date (that is, at a premium). This guidance is effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance should be applied using a modified retrospective method through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


Accounting Standards Update (ASU)DescriptionEffective DateEffect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, as amended (ASU 2020-04)This guidance provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The new guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. These transactions include:
• contract modifications,
• hedging relationships, and
• sale or transfer of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity (HTM).
This guidance is effective immediately for the Bank, and the Bank may elect to apply the amendments prospectively through December 31, 2022.The Bank has assessed the guidance and has elected some of the optional expedients and exceptions provided. In particular, during the fourth quarter of 2020, the Bank elected optional expedients specific to the discounting transition for cleared derivative transactions on a retrospective basis, which did not have a material effect. Additionally, the Bank elected optional expedients related to the discounting transition for uncleared derivative transactions on a prospective basis during 2021, which did not have a material effect.

123
99


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)






Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The amendments require that employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the Statements of Income. This guidance became effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018, and was adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the Statements of Income. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and financial statement disclosures.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the Statements of Cash Flows. This guidance is intended to reduce existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the Statements of Cash Flows. This guidance became effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting for credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to measure expected credit losses based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate under the circumstances. In addition, under the new guidance, a financial asset, or a group of financial assets, is required to be measured at its amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected over the contractual term of the financial assets. Among other things, the guidance also requires:
The Statement of Income to reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period.
The entities to determine the allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination that are measured at amortized cost basis in a similar manner to other financial assets measured at amortized cost basis. The initial allowance for credit losses is required to be added to the purchase price.
Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. The amendments limit the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost.
Public entities to further disaggregate the current disclosure of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables by the year of origination (i.e., vintage).

The guidance is effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. Early application is permitted as of the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance should be applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In addition, the entities are required to use a prospective transition approach for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination and for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The Bank does not intend to adopt the guidance early. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance and expects the adoption of the guidance may result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses given the requirement to assess losses for the entire estimated life of the financial asset, including an allowance for debt securities. The effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows will depend on the composition of financial assets held by the Bank at the adoption date, as well as on economic conditions and forecasts at that time.


124


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. On March 14, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The guidance requires entities to apply only the four-step decision sequence when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise a call (put) option is related to interest rates or credit risks. This guidance became effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. On March 10, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under U.S. GAAP does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. This guidance became effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The amendments provide entities with the option to apply the guidance using either a prospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, retrospectively applied to all derivative instruments that meet the specific conditions. The Bank elected to early adopt the guidance prospectively on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Recognition of Lease Assets and Lease Liabilities. On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the Statements of Condition and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. In particular, this guidance requires a lessee of operating or finance leases to recognize on the Statements of Condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Under previous U.S. GAAP, a lessee was not required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases on the Statements of Condition. While this guidance does not fundamentally change lessor accounting, some changes have been made to align that guidance with the lessee guidance and other areas within U.S. GAAP.

The guidance becomes effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, and early application is permitted. The guidance requires lessors and lessees to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements using a modified retrospective approach. The Bank does not intend to adopt this guidance early. Upon adoption, the Bank expects to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of recording right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for its existing leases on the Statements of Condition. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance, but its effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows is not expected to be material.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance on certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Requires equity investments (with certain exceptions) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income;
Requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments;
Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the Statement of Condition or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements;

125


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Eliminates the requirement for public entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the Statement of Condition.

The guidance became effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance affected the Bank’s disclosures. However, the requirement to present the instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income did not have any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers. On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued its guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. This guidance outlines a comprehensive model for recognizing revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. In addition, this guidance amends the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of non-financial assets that are not in a contract with a customer. This guidance applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of certain other standards, such as financial instruments, certain guarantees, insurance contracts, and lease contracts.

The guidance provides entities with the option of using either of the following adoption methods: a full retrospective method, applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented; or a modified retrospective method, with the cumulative effect of retrospectively applying this guidance recognized at the date of initial application.

On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued an amendment to defer the effective date of the guidance issued in May 2014 by one year. In 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued additional amendments to clarify certain aspects of the new revenue guidance. However, the amendments do not change the core principle in the new revenue standard. The guidance became effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Given that the majority of the Bank’s financial instruments and other contractual rights that generate revenue are covered by other accounting guidance under U.S. GAAP, the effect of this guidance on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows was not material.

Note 3 — Cash and Due from Banks


Cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, and amounts due from correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve Bank are included in Cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition.


Cash and due from banks includes certain compensating balances, wherethe Bank maintains collected cash balances with commercial banks in consideration for certain services. There are no legal restrictions under these agreements on the withdrawal of these funds. The average collected cash balances were approximately $30$85 for 20172021 and $44$134 for 2016.2020.

Note 4 — Investments

The Bank makes short-term investments in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold, and may make other investments in debt securities, which are classified as trading, AFS, or HTM.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold to provide short-term liquidity. These investments are generally transacted with counterparties that have received an investment grade credit rating of BBB or greater by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). At December 31, 2021 and 2020, NaN of these investments were with counterparties rated below BBB nor with unrated counterparties. These may differ from any internal ratings of the investments by the Bank, if applicable.
Federal funds sold are unsecured loans that are generally transacted on an overnight term. Finance Agency regulations include a limit on the amount of unsecured credit the Bank may extend to a counterparty. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, all investments in interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold were repaid or expected to be repaid according to the relevant contractual terms. NaN allowance for credit losses was recorded for these assets at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Carrying values of interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold exclude de minimis amounts of accrued interest receivable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Based upon the collateral held as security and collateral maintenance provisions with its counterparties, the Bank determined that 0 allowance for credit losses was needed for its securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The carrying value of securities purchased under agreements excludes de minimis amounts of accrued interest receivable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Debt Securities
The Bank invests in debt securities, which are classified as either trading, AFS, or HTM. Within these investments, the Bank is primarily subject to credit risk related to PLRMBS that are supported by underlying mortgage loans. The Bank is prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from purchasing certain higher risk securities, such as equity securities and debt instruments that are not investment quality at time of purchase.
126
100


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







Note 4 — Trading Securities

Securities. The estimated fair value of trading securities as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, was as follows:

20212020
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$250 $4,257 
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
Total$252 $4,260 
 December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) – Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds$1,158
 $2,058
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae6
 8
Total$1,164
 $2,066

The net gain/(loss) on trading securities was $(57), $15, and $(2) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, of which $(6), $15, and $(2) related to unrealized gain/(loss) on trading securities was de minimis, $4, and $(2) for the years ended held at December 31, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016, and 2015,2019, respectively. These amounts represent the changes in the fair value of the securities during the reported periods.

Note 5 — Available-for-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale (AFS)Securities. AFS securities by major security type as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, were as follows:
December 31, 2021

Amortized
Cost(1)
Allowance for Credit LossesGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated Fair Value
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$503 $— $$— $504 
MBS:
Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) – multifamily:
Freddie Mac787 — 24 — 811 
Fannie Mae7,269 — 140 — 7,409 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – multifamily8,056 — 164 — 8,220 
PLRMBS:
Prime134 (1)12 — 145 
Alt-A1,316 (16)167 (4)1,463 
Subtotal PLRMBS1,450 (17)179 (4)1,608 
Total MBS9,506 (17)343 (4)9,828 
Total$10,009 $(17)$344 $(4)$10,332 
101

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Amortized
Cost(1)
Allowance for Credit LossesGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated Fair Value
December 31, 2017         
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
U.S. obligations – Treasury securities:U.S. obligations – Treasury securities:
U.S. Treasury notesU.S. Treasury notes$2,980 $— $$— $2,983 
U.S. Treasury billsU.S. Treasury bills2,000 — — — 2,000 
Total U.S. obligations – Treasury securitiesTotal U.S. obligations – Treasury securities4,980 — — 4,983 
MBS:MBS:
GSEs – multifamily:GSEs – multifamily:
Freddie MacFreddie Mac833 — 18 — 851 
Fannie MaeFannie Mae7,744 — 72 (6)7,810 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – multifamilySubtotal MBS – GSEs – multifamily8,577 — 90 (6)8,661 
PLRMBS:         PLRMBS:
Prime$335
 $
 $29
 $
 $364
Prime174 (1)— 182 
Alt-A, option ARM714
 (10) 130
 
 834
Alt-A, other2,447
 (23) 211
 
 2,635
Alt-AAlt-A1,725 (20)168 (20)1,853 
Subtotal PLRMBSSubtotal PLRMBS1,899 (21)177 (20)2,035 
Total MBSTotal MBS10,476 (21)267 (26)10,696 
Total$3,496
 $(33) $370
 $
 $3,833
Total$15,456 $(21)$270 $(26)$15,679 

December 31, 2016         
 
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
PLRMBS:         
Prime$413
 $(1) $22
 $
 $434
Alt-A, option ARM853
 (31) 77
 (2) 897
Alt-A, other3,087
 (82) 154
 (1) 3,158
Total$4,353
 $(114) $253
 $(3) $4,489

(1)
Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings.

Expected maturities(1)    Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, net charge-offs, and valuation adjustments for hedging activities, and excludes accrued interest receivable of PLRMBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers generally have the right to prepay the underlying obligations without prepayment fees.

At $29 and $46 at December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, respectively.
At December 31, 2021, the amortized cost of the Bank’s PLRMBSMBS classified as AFS included premiums of $59, discounts of $41, and credit-related OTTI of $801.$405 for AFS securities with an OTTI recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020. At December 31, 2016,2020, the amortized cost of the Bank’s PLRMBSMBS classified as AFS included premiums of $65, discounts of $47, and credit-related OTTI of $941.$486 for AFS securities with an OTTI recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020.

The following table summarizestables summarize the AFS securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. Total unrealized losses in the following table will not agree to total gross unrealized losses in the table above. The unrealized losses in the following table also include non-credit-related

December 31, 2021
 Less Than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
 Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
PLRMBS:
Prime$— $— $$— $$— 
Alt-A19 — 146 165 
Total$19 $— $152 $$171 $
127
102


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







December 31, 2020
Less Than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$501 $— $— $— $501 $— 
MBS – GSEs – multifamily – Fannie Mae731 222 — 953 
PLRMBS:
Prime— — 11 — 
Alt-A151 168 13 319 20 
Subtotal PLRMBS155 175 13 330 20 
Total$1,387 $13 $397 $13 $1,784 $26 
OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. For OTTI analysisRedemption Terms. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of AFS securities, see Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.

December 31, 2017           
  
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
  
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

PLRMBS:           
Prime$
 $
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 144
 10
 144
 10
Alt-A, other5
 
 356
 23
 361
 23
Total$5
 $
 $511
 $33
 $516
 $33
December 31, 2016     
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

PLRMBS:           
Prime$
 $
 $14
 $1
 $14
 $1
Alt-A, option ARM14
 
 249
 33
 263
 33
Alt-A, other57
 
 1,048
 83
 1,105
 83
Total$71
 $
 $1,311
 $117
 $1,382
 $117

As indicated in the tables above,non-MBS investments by contractual maturity (based on contractual final principal payment) and of MBS as of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, are shown below. Expected maturities of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the Bank’s investments classified as AFS had unrealized losses relatedright to PLRMBS, which were primarily due to illiquidity incall or prepay the PLRMBS market and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their amortized cost.obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

December 31, 2021
Year of Contractual MaturityAmortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value
AFS securities other than MBS – Due in 1 year or less$503 $504 
MBS9,506 9,828 
Total$10,009 $10,332 
See Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis for information on the transfers of securities between the AFS portfolio and the HTM portfolio.
December 31, 2020
Year of Contractual MaturityAmortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value
AFS securities other than MBS:
Due in 1 year or less$4,469 $4,470 
Due after 1 year through 5 years511 513 
Subtotal4,980 4,983 
MBS10,476 10,696 
Total$15,456 $15,679 



128


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 6 — Held-to-Maturity Securities

Securities. The Bank classifies the following securities as HTM because the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity:
103
December 31, 2017           
  
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Certificates of deposit$500
 $
 $500
 $
 $
 $500
Housing finance agency bonds:           
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds187
 
 187
 
 (9) 178
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae751
 
 751
 1
 (1) 751
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac2,039
 
 2,039
 12
 (15) 2,036
Fannie Mae3,600
 
 3,600
 34
 (8) 3,626
Subtotal GSEs – single-family5,639
 
 5,639
 46
 (23) 5,662
GSEs – multifamily:

           
Freddie Mac4,651
 
 4,651
 6
 (6) 4,651
Fannie Mae2,131
 
 2,131
 2
 
 2,133
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily
6,782
 
 6,782
 8
 (6) 6,784
Subtotal GSEs12,421
 
 12,421
 54
 (29) 12,446
PLRMBS:           
Prime521
 
 521
 5
 (6) 520
Alt-A, other306
 (6) 300
 11
 (2) 309
Subtotal PLRMBS827
 (6) 821
 16
 (8) 829
Total MBS13,999
 (6) 13,993
 71
 (38) 14,026
Total$14,686
 $(6) $14,680
 $71
 $(47) $14,704

129


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







December 31, 2021

Amortized
Cost(1)
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains(2)
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses(2)
Estimated
Fair Value
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – single-family:
Ginnie Mae$113 $$— $115 
MBS – GSEs – single-family:
Freddie Mac207 — 211 
Fannie Mae804 12 (1)815 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – single-family1,011 16 (1)1,026 
MBS – GSEs – multifamily:
Freddie Mac1,177 — 1,181 
Fannie Mae693 (1)693 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – multifamily1,870 (1)1,874 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs2,881 21 (2)2,900 
PLRMBS:
Prime140 (1)140 
Alt-A77 (1)80 
Subtotal PLRMBS217 (2)220 
Total$3,211 $28 $(4)$3,235 
December 31, 2020

Amortized
Cost(1)
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains(2)
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses(2)
Estimated
Fair Value
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – single-family:
Ginnie Mae$261 $$— $268 
MBS – GSEs – single-family:
Freddie Mac511 11 — 522 
Fannie Mae1,229 21 (1)1,249 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – single-family1,740 32 (1)1,771 
MBS – GSEs – multifamily:
Freddie Mac1,844 (2)1,844 
Fannie Mae945 — (1)944 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs – multifamily2,789 (3)2,788 
Subtotal MBS – GSEs4,529 34 (4)4,559 
PLRMBS:
Prime185 — (4)181 
Alt-A106 (2)107 
Subtotal PLRMBS291 (6)288 
Total$5,081 $44 $(10)$5,115 
December 31, 2016           
  
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Certificates of deposit$1,350
 $
 $1,350
 $
 $
 $1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:           
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds225
 
 225
 
 (18) 207
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:      ��    
Ginnie Mae951
 
 951
 5
 (1) 955
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac2,793
 
 2,793
 23
 (15) 2,801
Fannie Mae5,037
 
 5,037
 47
 (14) 5,070
Subtotal GSEs – single-family7,830
 
 7,830
 70
 (29) 7,871
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,556
 
 1,556
 
 (1) 1,555
Fannie Mae1,058
 
 1,058
 
 (1) 1,057
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily2,614
 
 2,614
 
 (2) 2,612
Subtotal GSEs10,444
 
 10,444
 70
 (31) 10,483
PLRMBS:           
Prime707
 
 707
 2
 (15) 694
Alt-A, other459
 (9) 450
 11
 (9) 452
Subtotal PLRMBS1,166
 (9) 1,157
 13
 (24) 1,146
Total MBS12,561
 (9) 12,552
 88
 (56) 12,584
Total$14,136

$(9)
$14,127

$88

$(74)
$14,141

(1)Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings. The carrying value of HTM securities represents amortized cost after adjustment for non-credit-related OTTI recognized in AOCI.

At(1)    Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and net charge offs, and excludes accrued interest receivable of $2 and $5 at December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)    Gross unrecognized gains/(losses) represent the amortized costdifference between estimated fair value and net carrying value.
Expected maturities of the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $19, discounts of $24, and credit-related OTTI of $7. At December 31, 2016,will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the amortized cost ofright to call or prepay the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $29, discounts of $34, and credit-related OTTI of $8.

The following tables summarize the HTM securitiesunderlying obligations with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. Total unrealized losses in the following table will not agree to the total gross unrecognized holding losses in the table above. The unrealized losses in the following table also include non-credit-related OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. For OTTI analysis of HTM securities, see Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.


or without call or prepayment fees.
130
104


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







At December 31, 2021, the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $3, discounts of $4, and credit-related OTTI of $6 for HTM securities with an OTTI recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020. At December 31, 2020, the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $5, discounts of $6, and credit-related OTTI of $6 for HTM securities with an OTTI recognized pursuant to the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS and HTM Securities. The following table presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses on investment securities associated with PLRMBS classified as AFS for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Bank recorded no allowance for credit losses associated with HTM securities during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Under the previous accounting methodology of security impairment, the Bank recognized credit-related net OTTI loss of $11 during the year ended December 31, 2019.
20212020
Balance, beginning of the period$21 $— 
(Charge-offs)/recoveries(1)(4)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses(3)25 
Balance, end of the period$17 $21 
To evaluate investment securities for credit loss at December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank employed the following methodologies, based on the type of security.
AFS and HTM Securities (Excluding PLRMBS) – The Bank’s AFS and HTM securities are principally U.S. obligations and MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae that are backed by single-family or multifamily mortgage loans. The Bank only purchases securities considered investment quality. Excluding PLRMBS investments, at December 31, 2021 and 2020, substantially all of AFS securities and HTM securities, based on amortized cost, were rated A, or above, by an NRSRO, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security. These may differ from any internal ratings of the securities by the Bank, if applicable.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, certain of the Bank’s AFS securities were in an unrealized loss position. These losses are considered temporary as the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis on these AFS investment securities and neither intends to sell these securities nor considers it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of each security's remaining amortized cost basis. Further, the Bank has not experienced any payment defaults on the instruments. In addition, substantially all of these securities carry an implicit or explicit government guarantee. As a result, no allowance for credit losses was recorded on these AFS securities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank had not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its HTM securities because the securities: (i) were all highly rated or had short remaining terms to maturity, (ii) had not experienced, nor did the Bank expect, any payment default on the instruments, and (iii) in the case of GSE or other U.S. obligations, carry an implicit or explicit government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero.
105
December 31, 2017           
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Housing finance agency bonds:           
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $178
 $9
 $178
 $9
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae406
 1
 
 
 406
 1
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac895
 9
 323
 6
 1,218
 15
Fannie Mae702
 4
 205
 4
 907
 8
Subtotal GSEs – single-family1,597
 13
 528
 10
 2,125
 23
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,058
 6
 
 
 1,058
 6
Fannie Mae456
 
 
 
 456
 
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily

1,514
 6
 
 
 1,514
 6
Subtotal GSEs3,111
 19
 528
 10
 3,639
 29
PLRMBS:           
Prime2
 
 202
 6
 204
 6
Alt-A, other15
 
 191
 8
 206
 8
Subtotal PLRMBS17
 
 393
 14
 410
 14
Total MBS3,534
 20
 921
 24
 4,455
 44
Total$3,534
 $20
 $1,099
 $33
 $4,633
 $53
December 31, 2016           
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Housing finance agency bonds:           
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $193
 $18
 $193
 $18
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae190
 1
 
 
 190
 1
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac1,498
 15
 3
 
 1,501
 15
Fannie Mae2,665
 12
 96
 2
 2,761
 14
Subtotal GSEs – single-family4,163
 27
 99
 2
 4,262
 29
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,007
 1
 
 
 1,007
 1
Fannie Mae387
 1
 
 
 387
 1
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily1,394
 2
 
 
 1,394
 2
Subtotal GSEs5,557
 29
 99
 2
 5,656
 31
PLRMBS:           
Prime1
 
 517
 15
 518
 15
Alt-A, other
 
 452
 18
 452
 18
Subtotal PLRMBS1
 
 969
 33
 970
 33
Total MBS5,748
 30
 1,068
 35
 6,816
 65
Total$5,748
 $30
 $1,261
 $53
 $7,009
 $83

131


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







Private-Label Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities – The Bank also holds investments in PLRMBS. The Bank has not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of 2008. However, many of these securities have subsequently experienced significant credit deterioration. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately 5% and 6%, respectively, of PLRMBS (AFS and HTM combined, based on amortized cost) were rated A, or above, by an NRSRO; and the remaining securities were either rated less than A, or were unrated. To determine whether an allowance for credit loss is necessary on these securities, the Bank uses cash flow analyses. For certain PLRMBS where underlying collateral data is not available, alternative procedures as determined by the Bank are used to assess these securities for credit loss measurement.

As indicated inAt each quarter end, the tables above,Bank compares the Bank’s investments classified as HTM had unrealized losses on CalHFA bonds and MBS. The unrealized losses associated withpresent value of the CalHFA bonds were mainly due to an illiquid market, credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investmentscash flows expected to be valued at a discountcollected on its PLRMBS, using the effective interest rate, to their acquisition cost. For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of thesethe securities because to determine whether a credit loss exists. The expected credit losses are measured using:
expected housing price changes;
expected interest rate assumptions;
the Bank determined thatremaining payment terms for the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. The unrealized losses associated with the PLRMBS were primarily due to illiquidity in the PLRMBS marketsecurity;
expected default rates based on underlying loan-level borrower and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their amortized cost.characteristics;

Redemption Terms. The amortized cost, carrying value, and estimated fair value of non-MBS securities by contractual maturity (based on contractual final principal payment) and of MBS as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, are shown below. Expected maturities of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers generally have the right to prepay the underlying obligations without prepayment fees.

December 31, 2017     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due in 1 year or less$500
 $500
 $500
Due after 5 years through 10 years12
 12
 12
Due after 10 years175
 175
 166
Subtotal687
 687
 678
MBS13,999
 13,993
 14,026
Total$14,686
 $14,680
 $14,704
December 31, 2016     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due in 1 year or less$1,350
 $1,350
 $1,350
Due after 5 years through 10 years35
 35
 34
Due after 10 years190
 190
 173
Subtotal1,575
 1,575
 1,557
MBS12,561
 12,552
 12,584
Total$14,136
 $14,127
 $14,141

(1)Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings. The carrying value of HTM securities represents amortized cost after adjustment for non-credit-related OTTI recognized in AOCI.

See Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis for informationloss severities on the transfers of securities between the AFS portfolio and the HTM portfolio.

Note 7 — Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis

On a quarterly basis, the Bank evaluates its individual AFS and HTM investment securities in an unrealized loss position for OTTI.

PLRMBS. To assess whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of itscollateral supporting each unique PLRMBS the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for all of its PLRMBS as of December 31, 2017, using two third-party models. The OTTI Governance Committee of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) developed a short-term housing price

132


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 5.0% to an increase of 12.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2017. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from an increase of 2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics; and

prepayment speeds based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics.
The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in these assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined reflects a best-estimate scenariomanagement’s expectations and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

At each quarter end, the Bank compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected on its PLRMBS to the amortized cost basis of the securities to determine whether a credit loss exists. The Bank then uses the effective interest rate for the security prior to impairment for determining the present value of the future estimated cash flows.

horizons.
For all the PLRMBS in its AFS and HTM portfolios, the Bank does not intend to sell any security and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

For securities determinedwith an OTTI recognized pursuant to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017the impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020 (securities for which the Bank determined that it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis), the following table presents a summarymeasurement of the fair value of PLRMBS classified as Level 3 as of December 31, 2021, use significant inputs used in measuringthat include the amountweighted average percentage based on unpaid principal balance of creditprepayment rates, 11.6%; default rates, 7.5%; and loss recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2017, andseverities, 54.9%. The weighted average percentage based on unpaid principal balance of the related current credit enhancement for the Bank.

December 31, 2017       
 Significant Inputs for Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS Current
 Prepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit Enhancement
Year of Securitization
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
Alt-A, other       
200710.4 29.5 39.4 0.7
200610.8 20.2 39.2 25.0
200513.5 17.8 34.6 2.9
2004 and earlier14.0 1.7 31.4 9.3
Total Alt-A, other11.5 23.4 37.8 7.5
Total11.5 23.4 37.8 7.5

(1) Weighted average percentage is based on unpaid principal balance.

these securities was 8.3% as of December 31, 2021.
Credit enhancement is defined as the percentage of subordinated tranches, excess spread, and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will generally absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security. The calculated averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS investments in each category shown. The classification is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the CUSIP, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.

The following table presents the credit-related OTTI, which istotal net accretion recognized in earnings,interest income associated with PLRMBS that were other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2020, totaled $70, $70, and $78 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019, respectively. Accretion of yield adjustments resulting from improvement of expected cash flows that are recognized over the remaining life of the securities total $51, $59, and $61 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

133


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$1,183
 $1,255
 $1,314
Additional charges on securities for which OTTI was previously recognized(1)
16
 16
 15
Securities matured during the period(2)
(1) (7) 
Accretion of yield adjustments resulting from improvement of expected cash flows that are recognized over the remaining life of the securities(3)
(69) (81) (74)
Balance, end of the period$1,129
 $1,183
 $1,255

(1)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, “securities for which OTTI was previously recognized” represents all securities that were also other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
(2)Represents reductions related to securities having reached final maturity during the period, which therefore are no longer held by the Bank at the end of the period.
(3)
The total net accretion/(amortization) associated with other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (amount recognized in interest income) totaled $93, $101, and $82 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Changes in circumstances may causeIn general, the Bank to change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. The sale or transfer of an HTM security because of certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuers’ creditworthiness, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. In addition, other events that are isolated, nonrecurring, or unusual for the Bank that could not have been reasonably anticipated may cause the Bank to sell or transfer an HTM security without necessarily calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity.

The Bank electedelects to transfer any PLRMBS that incurred a credit-related OTTI chargecredit loss during the applicable period from the Bank’s held-to-maturityHTM portfolio to its available-for-saleAFS portfolio at their fair values. The Bank recognized an OTTIa credit loss on these held-to-maturityHTM PLRMBS, which the Bank believes is evidence of a significant decline in the issuers’ creditworthiness.credit quality of the underlying collateral. The decline in the issuers’ creditworthinesscredit quality of the underlying collateral is the basis for the transfers to the available-for-saleAFS portfolio. These transfers allow the Bank the option to sell these securities prior to maturity in view of changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, or other factors, while recognizing the Bank’s intent to hold these securities for an indefinite period of time. The Bank does not intend to sell its other-than-temporarily impaired securities and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

The Bank did not transfer any PLRMBS from its HTM portfolio to its AFS portfolio during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The following tables present the Bank’s AFS and HTM PLRMBS that incurred OTTI losses anytime during the life of the securities at December 31, 2017 and 2016, by loan collateral type:

106
December 31, 2017             
 Available-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:             
Prime$405
 $335
 $364
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alt-A, option ARM953
 714
 834
 
 
 
 
Alt-A, other2,927
 2,447
 2,635
 64
 59
 53
 63
Total$4,285
 $3,496
 $3,833
 $64
 $59
 $53
 $63


134


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







securities for an indefinite period of time. The Bank transferred PLRMBS from its HTM portfolio to its AFS portfolio with an amortized cost and fair value of $2, $3, and $1 in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
December 31, 2016             
 Available-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:             
Prime$498
 $413
 $434
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alt-A, option ARM1,134
 853
 897
 
 
 
 
Alt-A, other3,650
 3,087
 3,158
 93
 88
 79
 91
Total$5,282
 $4,353
 $4,489
 $93
 $88
 $79
 $91

For the Bank’s PLRMBS, that were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017, the Bank has experienced net unrealizedrecorded a reversal of credit losses of $3 in 2021, primarily resulting from lower default rates as well as improved projected credit performance in part related to a more optimistic economic outlook because of the monetary and fiscal stimulus measures taken by the U.S. government. The Bank recorded a provision for credit losses on its PLRMBS portfolio of $25 in 2020, primarily resulting from declines in fair value in March 2020 as a result of disruptions in the financial markets combined with illiquidity in the PLRMBS market and marketdecreased expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their amortized cost. The Bank does not intend to sell these securities, it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, and the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on these PLRMBS are temporary. These securities were included in the securities that the Bank reviewed and analyzed for OTTI as discussed above, and the analyses performed indicated that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired.


All Other Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Investments. For the Bank’s investments in housing finance agency bonds, which were issued by CalHFA, the gross unrealized losses were mainly due to an illiquid market, credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investments to be valued at a discount to their acquisition cost. The Bank independently modeled cash flows for the underlying collateral, using assumptions for default rates and loss severity that a market participant would deem reasonable, and concluded that the available credit support within the CalHFA structure more than offset the projected underlying collateral losses. The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on the bonds are temporary because the underlying collateral and credit enhancements were sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Bank determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on its agency MBS are temporary.

Note 85 — Advances

The Bank offers a wide range of fixed and adjustable rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics, and option features. Fixed rate advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Adjustable rate advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 10 years, with the interest rates resetting periodically at a fixed spread to LIBOR or to anothera specified index.

Redemption Terms. The Bank had advances outstanding, excluding overdrawn demand deposit accounts, at interest rates ranging from 0.79% to 8.57% at December 31, 2017, and 0.43%0.13% to 8.57% at December 31, 2016,2021, and 0.00% to 8.57% at December 31, 2020, as summarized below.

 20212020
Redemption Term
Amount
Outstanding(1)
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Amount
Outstanding(1)
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Within 1 year$4,129 0.85 %$11,862 1.65 %
After 1 year through 2 years2,744 1.52 6,399 1.61 
After 2 years through 3 years3,092 1.59 4,321 2.10 
After 3 years through 4 years2,618 1.31 2,704 1.79 
After 4 years through 5 years3,063 1.90 3,278 1.26 
After 5 years1,212 2.12 1,774 1.79 
Total par value16,858 1.45 %30,338 1.68 %
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities103 509 
Valuation adjustments under fair value option66 130 
Unamortized discounts— (1)
Total$17,027 $30,976 
135(1)Carrying amounts exclude accrued interest receivable of $5 and $6 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017 2016
Contractual Maturity
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Within 1 year$46,403
 1.46% $22,902
 0.78%
After 1 year through 2 years16,287
 1.61
 7,608
 1.36
After 2 years through 3 years5,423
 1.73
 9,410
 1.22
After 3 years through 4 years6,719
 1.69
 2,083
 1.39
After 4 years through 5 years1,741
 2.10
 6,423
 1.24
After 5 years913
 3.13
 1,431
 2.60
Total par value77,486
 1.57% 49,857
 1.09%
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities(88)   (22)  
Valuation adjustments under fair value option(16)   10
  
Total$77,382
   $49,845
  

Many of the Bank’s advances are prepayable at the borrower’s option. However, when advances are prepaid, the borrower is generally charged a prepayment fee intended to make the Bank financially indifferent to the prepayment. In addition, for certain advances with full or partial prepayment symmetry, the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid. The Bank had advances with full prepayment symmetry outstanding totaling $9,027 at December 31, 2021, and $19,919 at December 31, 2020. The Bank had advances with partial prepayment symmetry outstanding totaling $4,619$1,436 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $3,647$1,817 at December 31, 2016.2020. Some advances may be repaid on pertinent call dates without prepayment fees (callable advances). The Bank had callable advances outstanding totaling $18,373$70 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $15,505$1,100 at December 31, 2016.2020.

The Bank’sBank had putable advances totaling $220 at December 31, 20172021, and 2016, included $0 and $125 of putable advances, respectively.$220 at December 31, 2020. At the Bank’s discretion, the Bank may terminate these advances on predetermined exercise dates and offer replacement
107

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




funding at prevailing market rates, subject to certain conditions. The Bank would typically exercise such termination rights when interest rates increase relative to contractual rates.

The following table summarizes advances at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by the earlier of the year of contractual maturityredemption term or next call date for callable advances and by the earlier of the year of contractual maturityredemption term or next put date for putable advances.
Earlier of Redemption
Term or Next Call Date
Earlier of Redemption
Term or Next Put Date
2021202020212020
Within 1 year$4,199 $12,962 $4,349 $12,082 
After 1 year through 2 years2,744 5,299 2,744 6,399 
After 2 years through 3 years3,042 4,321 3,092 4,321 
After 3 years through 4 years2,618 2,704 2,618 2,704 
After 4 years through 5 years3,063 3,278 3,063 3,278 
After 5 years1,192 1,774 992 1,554 
Total par value$16,858 $30,338 $16,858 $30,338 
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Put Date
 2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
Within 1 year$52,624
 $25,784
 $46,403
 $22,927
After 1 year through 2 years12,593
 11,078
 16,287
 7,583
After 2 years through 3 years7,973
 4,465
 5,423
 9,410
After 3 years through 4 years1,719
 5,782
 6,719
 2,083
After 4 years through 5 years1,729
 1,421
 1,741
 6,423
After 5 years848
 1,327
 913
 1,431
Total par value$77,486
 $49,857
 $77,486
 $49,857

Credit and Concentration Risk. The following tables present the concentration in advances to the top five borrowers and their affiliates at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. The tables also present the interest income from
these advances before the impact of interest rate exchange agreements associated with these advances for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

December 31, 2021
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances
First Republic Bank$3,700 22 %$115 28 %
MUFG Union Bank, National Association2,050 12 103 25 
First Technology Federal Credit Union(2)
1,819 11 28 
Luther Burbank Savings(2)
752 14 
Pacific Premier Bank550 ��� — 
Subtotal8,871 53 260 64 
Others7,987 47 147 36 
Total par value$16,858 100 %$407 100 %
136
108


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







December 31, 2020
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances
First Republic Bank$11,755 39 %$254 29 %
MUFG Union Bank, National Association4,575 15 173 20 
First Technology Federal Credit Union(2)
1,292 43 
CIT Bank, National Association1,100 23 
Luther Burbank Savings(2)
807 21 
     Subtotal19,529 64 514 59 
Others10,809 36 353 41 
Total par value$30,338 100 %$867 100 %

(1)    Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.
December 31, 2017
Name of BorrowerAdvances
Outstanding

 Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)

 Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Charles Schwab Bank$15,000
 19% $40
 5%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
11,363
 15
 174
 19
First Republic Bank8,400
 11
 112
 12
MUFG Union Bank, National Association7,250
 9
 48
 5
Bank of the West6,409
 8
 87
 10
     Subtotal48,422
 62
 461
 51
Others29,064
 38
 438
 49
Total par value$77,486
 100% $899
 100%

December 31, 2016
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
$14,807
 30% $119
 23%
Bank of the West7,305
 14
 49
 9
First Republic Bank5,900
 12
 70
 13
CIT Bank, N.A.2,411
 5
 28
 5
Star One Credit Union2,024
 4
 27
 5
     Subtotal32,447
 65
 293
 55
Others17,410
 35
 240
 45
Total par value$49,857
 100% $533
 100%

(1)Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.
(2)Nonmember institution.

(2)    An officer or director of the member was a Bank director.
The Bank held a security interest in collateral from each of the top five advances borrowers and their affiliates sufficient to support their respective advances outstanding, and the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.

For informationCredit Risk Exposure and Security Terms. The Bank manages its credit exposure related to the Bank’sadvances through an integrated approach that generally provides for a credit risk on advanceslimit to be established for each borrower, includes an ongoing review of each borrower’s financial condition, and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for advances at December 31, 2017is coupled with conservative collateral and 2016, are detailed below:

137


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Noteslending policies to Financial Statements (continued)



  
2017
 2016
Par value of advances:   
Fixed rate:   
Due within 1 year$31,767
 $13,486
Due after 1 year13,022
 10,845
Total fixed rate44,789
 24,331
Adjustable rate:   
Due within 1 year14,636
 9,416
Due after 1 year18,061
 16,110
Total adjustable rate32,697
 25,526
Total par value$77,486
 $49,857

The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and options characteristics of advances to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed or variable rate advance with embedded options, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. The combination of the advance and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates a variable rate asset. This type of hedge relationship receives fair value option accounting treatment. In addition, for certain advances for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the advance. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations generally do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment. For more information, see Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 19 – Fair Value.

The Bank did not have any advances with embedded features that met the requirements to separate the embedded feature from the host contract and designate the embedded feature as a stand-alone derivative at December 31, 2017 or 2016. The Bank has generally elected to account for certain advances with embedded features under the fair value option, and these advances are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. For more information, see Note 19 – Fair Value.

Prepayment Fees, Net. The Bank charges borrowers prepayment fees or pays borrowers prepayment credits when the principal on certain advances is paid prior to original maturity. The Bank records prepayment fees net of any associated fair value adjustments related to prepaid advances that were hedged. The net amount of prepayment fees is reflected as interest income in the Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, as follows:

 2017
 2016
 2015
Prepayment fees received$1
 $6
 $28
Fair value adjustments
 (1) (20)
Net$1
 $5
 $8
Advance principal prepaid$8,469
 $3,459
 $2,229

Note 9 — Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

Under the MPF® Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and mortgage loans insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the Department of VA under the MPF Government product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage

138


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had approved 23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in 2013.

From May 2002 through October 2006, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from its participating financial institutions under the MPF Original and MPF Plus products. Participating members originated or purchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhanced them and sold them to the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans.

The following table presents information as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, on mortgage loans, all of which are secured by one- to four-unit residential properties and single-unit second homes.

  
2017
 2016
Fixed rate medium-term mortgage loans$32
 $55
Fixed rate long-term mortgage loans1,973
 759
Subtotal2,005
 814
Unamortized premiums76
 18
Unamortized discounts(5) (6)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio2,076
 826
Less: Allowance for credit losses
 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$2,076
 $826

Medium-term loans have original contractual terms of 15 years or less, and long-term loans have contractual terms of more than 15 years.

The participating financial institution and the Bank sharelimit the risk of credit losses on conventional MPF loan products by structuring potential losses on conventional MPF loansloss while taking into layers with respect to each master commitment. After any primary mortgage insurance,account borrowers’ needs for a reliable funding source.
In addition, the Bank is obligated to incur the first layer or portion of credit losses not absorbed by the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan. Under the MPF Program, the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement protection consists of the credit enhancement amount, which may be a direct obligation of the participating financial institution or may be a supplemental mortgage insurance policy paid for by the participating financial institution, and may include a contingent performance-based credit enhancement fee payable to the participating financial institution. The participating financial institution is required to pledge collateral to secure any portion of its credit enhancement amount that is a direct obligation.

For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution or any successor a credit enhancement fee, typically 10 basis points per annum, which is calculated on the remaining unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. A participating financial institution may elect to receive the credit enhancement fees monthly over the life of the loans or as an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. The Bank records credit enhancement fees as a reduction to interest income. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees totaling $1 million in 2017 and de minimis amounts in 2016 and 2015.

For information related to the Bank’s credit risk on mortgage loans and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses.




139


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 10 — Allowance for Credit Losses

An allowance for credit losses is a valuation allowance separately established for each identified portfolio segment, if it is probable that impairment has occurred in the Bank's portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent necessary, an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded as a liability.

Portfolio Segments.A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses. The Bank has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses for each of the following portfolio segments:
advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of credit, collectively referred to as “credit products,”
MPF loans held for portfolio,
term securities purchased under agreements to resell, and
term Federal funds sold.

Classes of Financing Receivables.Classes of financing receivables generally are a disaggregation of a portfolio segment to the extent needed to understand the exposure to credit risk arising from these financing receivables. The Bank determined that no further disaggregation of the portfolio segments identified above is needed because the credit risk arising from these financing receivables is assessed and measured by the Bank at the portfolio segment level.

Credit Products. The Bank lends to member financial institutions that have atheir principal place of business in Arizona, California, or Nevada. Under the FHLBank Act,Nevada, in accordance with federal law and Finance Agency regulations. Specifically, the Bank is required to obtain sufficient collateral for credit products to protect the Bank from credit losses. Collateral eligible tofully secure credit products includes up to the member’s total credit limit. Borrowers may pledge the following eligible assets to secure advances:
one-to-four-family first lien residential mortgage loans;
securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies, including without limitation MBS backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae;
cash or deposits in the Bank;
certain investmentother real estate-related collateral, such as certain privately issued mortgage-backed securities, multifamily loans, commercial real estate loans, and second lien residential mortgage loans cash or deposits with the Bank,home equity loans; and other eligible real estate-related assets. The capital stock of the Bank owned by each borrowing member is pledged as additional collateral for the member's indebtedness to the Bank. The Bank may also accept secured
small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and securities representing a whole interest in such secured loans, as collateralvehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) from members that are community financial institutions.
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions. In addition, the Bank has advances outstanding to former members and member successors, which are also subject to thesethe security terms.

terms above. The Bank requires each borrowing member to execute a written Advances and Security Agreement, which describes the lending relationship between the Bank and the borrower. At December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Bank had a perfected security interest in collateral pledged by each borrowing member, or by the member's affiliate on behalf of the member, and by each nonmember borrower, with an estimated value in excess of the outstanding credit products for that borrower. Based on the financial condition of the borrower, the Bank may either (i) allow the borrower or the pledging affiliate to retain physical possession of loan collateral pledged to the Bank, provided that the borrower or the pledging affiliate agrees to hold the collateral for the benefit of the Bank, or (ii) require the borrower or the pledging affiliate to deliver physical possession of loan collateral to the Bank or its custodial agent.
109

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




All securities collateral is required to be delivered to the Bank'sBank’s custodial agent. All loan collateral pledged to the Bank is subject to a UCC-1Uniform Commercial Code-1 financing statement.

Section 10(e) of the FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the Bank by a member or any affiliate of the member or any nonmember borrower priority over claims or rights of any other party, except claims or rights that (i) would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law and (ii) are held by bona fide purchasers for value or secured parties with perfected security interests.

The Bank classifies as impaired any advance with respect to which it is probable that all principal and interest due will not be collected according to its contractual terms. Impaired advances are valued using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the advance's effective interest rate, the advance's observable market price

140


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



or, if collateral-dependent, the fair value of the advance's underlying collateral. When an advance is classified as impaired, the accrual of interest is discontinued and unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Advances do not return to accrual status until they are brought current with respect to both principal and interest and until the future principal payments are no longer in doubt. No advances were classified as impaired during the periods presented.

The Bank manages its credit exposure related to credit products through an integrated approach that generally provides for a credit limit to be established for each borrower, includes an ongoing review of each borrower’s financial condition, and is coupled with conservative collateral and lending policies to limit the risk of loss while taking into account borrowers’ needs for a reliable funding source. At December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, none of the Bank’s credit products were past due or on nonaccrual status, or considered impaired.status. There were no troubled debt restructurings related to credit products during December 31, 2017 and 2016.

2021 or 2020.
Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, repayment history on advances, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies as of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Therefore, no allowance for losses on credit productsadvances was deemed necessary by the Bank.Bank as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for advances at December 31, 2021 and 2020, are detailed below:
20212020
Par value of advances:
Fixed rate:
Due within 1 year$2,768 $11,044 
Due after 1 year12,729 17,126 
Total fixed rate15,497 28,170 
Adjustable rate:
Due within 1 year1,361 818 
Due after 1 year— 1,350 
Total adjustable rate1,361 2,168 
Total par value$16,858 $30,338 
The Bank did not have any advances with embedded features that met the requirements to separate the embedded feature from the host contract and designate the embedded feature as a stand-alone derivative at December 31, 2021 or 2020. The Bank has never experiencedgenerally elected to account for certain advances with embedded features under the fair value option, and these advances are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. For more information, see Note 14 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 15 – Fair Value.
Prepayment Fees, Net. The Bank charges borrowers prepayment fees or pays borrowers prepayment credits when the principal on certain advances is paid prior to original maturity. The Bank records prepayment fees net of any credit losses on its credit products.associated fair value adjustments related to prepaid advances that were hedged. The net amount of prepayment fees is reflected in the Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, as follows:

202120202019
Prepayment fees received/(paid)$47 $142 $
Fair value adjustments(16)(109)(6)
Net$31 $33 $
Advance principal prepaid$9,929 $26,741 $6,760 
No member institutions were placed into receivership during 2017 or from January 1, 2018
110

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to February 28, 2018.Financial Statements (continued)





Note 6 — Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio.Portfolio
The following table presents information as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, on mortgage loans, all of which are secured by one- to four-unit residential properties and single-unit second homes.

20212020
Fixed rate medium-term mortgage loans$18 $27 
Fixed rate long-term mortgage loans936 1,879 
Subtotal954 1,906 
Unamortized premiums28 35 
Unamortized discounts(1)(2)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio(1)
981 1,939 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(1)(4)
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$980 $1,935 
(1)Excludes accrued interest receivable of $6 and $10 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Medium-term loans have original contractual terms of 15 years or less, and long-term loans have contractual terms of more than 15 years.
Payment Status of Mortgage Loans. Payment status is the key credit quality indicator for conventional mortgage loans and allows the Bank to monitor the migration of past due loans. A mortgagepast due loan is consideredone where the borrower has failed to be impaired when itmake a scheduled full payment of principal and interest within 30 days of its due date. Other delinquency statistics include nonaccrual loans and loans in process of foreclosure. The following tables present the payment status for mortgage loans and other delinquency statistics for the Bank’s mortgage loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
111

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




December 31, 2021
Origination Year
Payment Status2017 to 2021Prior to 2017
Amortized Cost(1)
30 – 59 days delinquent$$$
60 – 89 days delinquent
90 days or more delinquent26 10 36 
Total past due34 14 48 
Total current loans729 204 933 
Total MPF$763 $218 $981 
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$
Nonaccrual loans(3)
$36 
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(4)
3.64 %
December 31, 2020
Origination Year
Payment Status2016 to 2020Prior to 2016
Amortized Cost(1)
30 – 59 days delinquent$20 $$22 
60 – 89 days delinquent
90 days or more delinquent95 104 
Total past due120 13 133 
Total current loans1,628 178 1,806 
Total MPF(5)
$1,748 $191 $1,939 
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$
Nonaccrual loans(3)
$104 
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(4)
5.34 %
(1)    The amortized cost in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs.
(2)    Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)    At December 31, 2021 and 2020, $21 and $62, respectively, of mortgage loans on nonaccrual status did not have an associated allowance for credit losses because these loans were either previously charged off to the expected recoverable value or the fair value of the underlying collateral, including any credit enhancements, is greater than the amortized cost of the loans.
(4)    Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, thatin the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according toprocess of foreclosure as a percentage of the contractual termsrecorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.
(5)    The amortized costs of the mortgage loans by origination year in the 2016 to 2020 column and prior to 2016 column that were previously disclosed in the “Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio” note were incorrectly presented as of December 31, 2020, in the Bank’s 2020 Form 10-K. The amortized costs of the mortgage loans by origination year as of December 31, 2020, have been corrected. The total amortized costs presented for each period were properly disclosed. These revisions had no effect on the Bank’s total assets, net interest income, or net income for all affected periods.
Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans. MPF loans are evaluated on a loan-level basis for expected credit losses, factoring in the credit enhancement structure at the master commitment level. The Bank determines its allowances for credit losses on MPF loans through analyses that include consideration of various loan agreement.

Loansportfolio and collateral related characteristics, such as past performance, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of expected economic conditions. The Bank uses models that areemploy a variety of methods, such as projected cash flows, to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the loans. These models rely on nonaccrual statusa number of inputs, such as current and that are considered collateral-dependent are measuredforecasted property values and interest rates as well as historical borrower behavior experience. At December 31, 2021, the Bank’s reasonable and supportable forecast of housing prices expects, on average, for impairmentprices to appreciate 8.4% over a one-year forecast horizon before reverting to long-term housing price appreciation rates of 3.3% after five additional years in the forecast based on historical averages. At December 31, 2020, the fair valueBank’s reasonable and supportable forecast of housing prices expects, on average, for prices to appreciate 2.3% over a one-year forecast horizon before reverting to long-term housing price appreciation rates of 3.8% over a
112

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




three-year forecast horizon based on historical averages. The Bank also incorporates associated credit enhancements, if any, to determine its estimate of expected credit losses.
Certain MPF loans may be evaluated for credit losses by the underlying property less estimated selling costs. Loans areBank using the practical expedient for collateral-dependent assets. A mortgage loan is considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, that is, if it is considered likely that the borrower will default and there is no credit enhancement to offset losses under the master commitment, or the collectability or availability of credit enhancement is deemed to be uncertain. Collateral-dependent loans are impaired ifdefault. The Bank may estimate the fair value of the underlyingthis collateral less estimated selling costs is insufficient to recover the unpaid principal balance on the loan. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as interest income on nonaccrual loans, as noted below.
by applying an appropriate loss severity rate or using third-party estimates or property valuation models. The Bank placesexpected credit loss of a collateral-dependent mortgage loan on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest from the participating financial institution is reported 90 days or more past due or when the loan is in foreclosure. When a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The Bank records cash payments received on nonaccrual loans first as interest income and then as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement, unless the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful.
The following table presents information on delinquent mortgage loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.


141


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017
 2016
 
Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

30 – 59 days delinquent$8
 $7
60 – 89 days delinquent2
 3
90 days or more delinquent12
 15
Total past due22
 25
Total current loans2,065
 805
Total mortgage loans$2,087
 $830
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$3
 $5
Nonaccrual loans$12
 $15
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(3)
0.59% 1.79%

(1)The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(2)Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure as a percentage of the recorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.

Mortgage Loans Evaluated at the Individual Master Commitment Level – The credit risk analysis of all conventional MPF loans is performed at the individual master commitment level to determine the credit enhancements available to recover losses on MPF loans under each individual master commitment.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans – Certain conventional mortgage loans, primarily impaired mortgage loans that are considered collateral-dependent, may be specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The estimated credit losses on impaired collateral-dependent loans may be separately determined because sufficient information exists to make a reasonable estimate of the inherent loss on those loans on an individual loan basis. The Bank estimates the fair value of collateral using real estate broker price opinions or automated valuation models (AVMs) based on property characteristics as well as recent market sales and current listings. The resulting incurred loss, if any, is equal to the difference between the carrying valueamortized cost of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. The Bank will either reserve for these estimated losses or record a direct charge-off of the loan balance, if certain triggering criteria are met. Expected recoveries of prior charge-offs, if any, are included in the allowance for credit loss.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans The following table presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit risk analysis of conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment considerslosses on the mortgage loan pool-specific attribute data, applies estimated loss severities, and considers the associated credit enhancements to determine the Bank's best estimate of probable incurred losses. The analysis includes estimating projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of all available information, including prepayment speeds, default rates, and loss severityportfolio for the mortgage loans based on underlying loan-level borroweryears ended December 31, 2021 and loan characteristics; expected housing price changes; and interest rate assumptions. In performing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Bank develops its best estimate of the cash flows expected to be collected using a third-party model to project prepayments, default rates, and loss severities based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the mortgage loans, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates.2020. The assumptions used as inputs to the model, including the forecast of future housing price changes, are consistent with assumptions used for the Bank's evaluation of its PLRMBS for OTTI.

The amountsamount of charge-offs and recoveries of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were de minimis duringfor the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016. Net charge-offs of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were $2 during the year ended December 31, 2015.2019.

For the Years Ended
20212020
Balance, beginning of the period$$— 
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change— 
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses(3)
Balance, end of the period$$


142


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The allowance for credit losses and recorded investment by impairment methodology for individually and collectively evaluated impaired loans are as follows:
(In millions)2017
 2016
Allowance for credit losses, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$
 $
Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
Total allowance for credit losses$
 $
Recorded investment, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$9
 $12
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,078
 818
Total recorded investment$2,087
 $830

The recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment are as follows:
 2017 2016
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
With no related allowance$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $
With an allowance
 
 
 
 
 
Total$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $

The average recorded investment on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:
 2017
 2016
With no related allowance$10
 $12
With an allowance
 
Total$10
 $12

The Bank and any participating financial institution share in the credit risk of the loans sold by that institution as specified in a master agreement. Loans purchased under the MPF Program generally had a credit risk exposure at the time of purchase that, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, would be expected from an equivalent investment rated AA if purchased prior to April 2017, or rated BBB if purchased since April 2017, taking into consideration the credit risk sharing structure mandated by the Finance Agency’s acquired member assets (AMA) regulation. The MPF Program structures potential credit losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each pool of loans purchased by the Bank under a single master commitment, as follows:

1.The first layer of protection against loss is the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
2.
The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
3.Losses that exceed the liquidation value of the real property and any primary mortgage insurance, up to an agreed-upon amount called the first loss account for each master commitment, are incurred by the Bank.
4.Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to an agreed-upon amount called the credit enhancement amount, are covered by the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement obligation at the time losses are incurred.
5.Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution’s remaining credit enhancement for the master commitment, if any, are incurred by the Bank.

The Bank calculates its estimated allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Original and MPF Plus products as described below. Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank implemented the accounting

143


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



requirements of regulatory Advisory Bulletin 2012-02. As a result, for any mortgage loans that areFor more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, this excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy, loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur. As a result of these charge-offs, corresponding Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans, which had previously provided for most of these expected losses, was reduced accordingly.

Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans The Bank evaluates the allowance for credit losses on MPF mortgage loans based on two components. The first component applies to each individual loan that is specifically identified as impaired. The Bank evaluates the exposure on these loans by considering the first layer of loss protection (the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan) and the availability and collectability of credit enhancements under the terms of each master commitment and records a provision for credit losses. For this component, the Bank established a de minimis allowance for credit losses for MPF Original and MPF Plus loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The second component applies to loans that are not specifically identified as impaired and is based on the Bank’s estimate of probable credit losses on those loans as of the financial statement date. The Bank evaluates the credit loss exposure on a loan pool basis considering various observable data, such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The Bank also considers the availability and collectability of credit enhancements from participating financial institutions or from mortgage insurers under the terms of each master commitment. For this component, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses for MPF Original and MPF Plus loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor for economic or legal reasonsinformation related to the debtor’s financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. An MPF loan considered a TDR is individually evaluatedBank’s accounting policies for impairment when determining its related allowancemortgage loans held for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash flow shortfalls incurred asportfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of the reporting date as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates, if applicable.Significant Accounting Policies.


The recorded investment of the Bank's nonperforming MPFloans classified as TDRs totaled $3 as of December 31, 2017, and $3 as of December 31, 2016. During 2017 and 2016, the difference between the pre- and post-modification recorded investment in TDRs that occurred during the year was de minimis. None of the MPF loans classified as TDRs within the previous 12 months experienced a payment default.

Term Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, and these investments are evaluated for purposes of an allowance for credit losses only if the investment is not paid when due. All investments in Federal funds sold as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were repaid or are expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms.

Note 117 — Deposits

The Bank maintains demand deposit accounts that are directly related to the extension of credit to members and offers short-term deposit programs to members and qualifying nonmembers. In addition, a member that services mortgage loans may deposit in the Bank funds collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of these funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. The Bank classifies these types of deposits as non-interest-bearing deposits.



144


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Deposits as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were as follows:
 2017
 2016
Interest-bearing deposits:   
Demand and overnight$263
 $167
Total interest-bearing deposits263
 167
Non-interest-bearing deposits18
 2
Total$281
 $169

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Deposits classified as demand, overnight, and other pay interest based on a daily interest rate. Term deposits pay interest based on a fixed rate determined at the issuance of the deposit. Interest
Deposits and interest rate payment terms for deposits at as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016, are detailed in the following table:2020, were as follows:

20212020
Amount
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Amount
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Interest-bearing deposits:
Adjustable rate$722 0.01 %$732 0.01 %
Fixed rate18 0.01 16 0.01 
Total interest-bearing deposits740 748 
Non-interest-bearing deposits29 139 
Total$769 $887 

113
 2017 2016
 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Interest-bearing deposit – Adjustable rate$263
 1.10% $167
 0.01%
Non-interest-bearing deposits18
   2
  
Total$281
   $169
  


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Note 128 — Consolidated Obligations

Consolidated obligations, consisting of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, are jointly issued by the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance, which serves as the FHLBanks’ agent. As provided by the FHLBank Act or by regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. For a discussion of the joint and several liability regulation, see Note 2016 – Commitments and Contingencies. In connection with each issuance of consolidated obligations, each FHLBank specifies the type, term, and amount of debt it requests to have issued on its behalf. The Office of Finance tracks the amount of debt issued on behalf of each FHLBank. In addition, the Bank separately tracks and records as a liability its specific portion of the consolidated obligations issued and is the primary obligor for that portion of the consolidated obligations issued. The Finance Agency and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury have oversight over the issuance of FHLBank debt through the Office of Finance.

Consolidated obligation bonds may be issued to raise short-, intermediate-, and long-term funds for the FHLBanks. The maturity of consolidated obligation bonds generally ranges from 6 months to 15 years, but the maturity is not subject to any statutory or regulatory limits. Consolidated obligation discount notes are primarily used to raise short-term funds. These notes are issued at less than their face amount and redeemed at par value when they mature.

The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $1,034,260$652,862 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $989,311$746,772 at December 31, 2016.2020. Regulations require the FHLBanks to maintain, for the benefit of investors in consolidated obligations, in the aggregate, unpledged qualifying assets in an amount equal to the consolidated obligations outstanding. Qualifying assets are defined as cash; secured advances; assets with an assessment or credit rating at least equivalent to the current assessment or credit rating of the consolidated obligations; obligations, participations, mortgages, or other securities of or issued by the United States or an agency of the United States; and such securities as fiduciary and trust funds may invest in under the laws of the state in which the FHLBank is located. Any assets subject to a lien or pledge for the benefit of holders of any issue of consolidated obligations are treated as if they were free from lien or pledge for the purposes of compliance with these regulations. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank had qualifying assets totaling $123,177,$53,623, and the Bank'sBank’s participation in consolidated obligations outstanding was $115,503.$46,703.


145


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



General Terms. Consolidated obligations are generally issued with either fixed rate payment terms or adjustable rate payment terms. In addition, to meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed rate and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain certain embedded features, such as call options and complex coupon payment terms. In general, when such consolidated obligation bonds are issued for which the Bank is the primary obligor, the Bank simultaneously enters into interest rate exchange agreements containing offsetting features to, in effect, convert the terms of the bond to the terms of a simple adjustable rate bond.

In addition to having fixed rate or simple adjustable rate coupon payment terms, consolidated obligations may, for example, include:
Callable bonds, which the Bank may call in whole or in part at its option on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Step-up callable bonds, which pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank'sBank’s option on the step-up dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Step-down callable bonds, which pay interest at decreasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank'sBank’s option on the step-down dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Conversion callable bonds, which have coupon rates that convert from fixed to adjustable or from adjustable to fixed on predetermined dates and can generally be called at the Bank’s option on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the bond offerings; and
114

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Range bonds, which have coupons at fixed or variable rates and pay the fixed or variable rate as long as a reference rate is within an established range, but generally pay zero percent or a minimal interest rate if the specified reference rate is outside the established range.

Redemption Terms. The following is a summary of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

 20212020
Contractual MaturityAmount
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Amount
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Within 1 year$7,349 0.18 %$34,542 0.23 %
After 1 year through 2 years1,757 0.67 6,923 0.21 
After 2 years through 3 years4,230 0.63 751 1.00 
After 3 years through 4 years1,855 0.72 677 0.67 
After 4 years through 5 years5,368 0.89 185 0.82 
After 5 years2,303 1.42 1,311 2.24 
Total par value22,862 0.64 %44,389 0.31 %
Unamortized premiums10 
Unamortized discounts(4)(5)
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities(139)13 
Fair value option valuation adjustments(6)
Total$22,716 $44,408 
 2017 2016
Contractual Maturity
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Within 1 year$69,734
 1.33% $33,879
 0.82%
After 1 year through 2 years6,461
 1.42
 10,597
 0.99
After 2 years through 3 years2,785
 1.74
 1,318
 1.32
After 3 years through 4 years2,058
 1.78
 1,055
 1.84
After 4 years through 5 years1,994
 2.15
 1,350
 1.59
After 5 years2,076
 2.80
 2,021
 2.42
Total par value85,108
 1.41% 50,220
 0.98%
Unamortized premiums9
   15
  
Unamortized discounts(11)   (9)  
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities(37)   6
  
Fair value option valuation adjustments(6)   (8)  
Total$85,063
   $50,224
  

The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding includes callable bonds of $9,612$14,620 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $4,670$3,140 at December 31, 2016.2020. When a callable bond for which the Bank is the primary obligor is issued, the Bank may simultaneously enter into an interest rate swap (in which(wherein the Bank pays a variable rate and receives a fixed rate) with a call feature that mirrors the call option embedded in the bond (a sold callable swap). The Bank had notional amounts of interest rate exchange agreements hedging callable bonds of $6,406$12,796 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $2,125$930 at December 31, 2016.2020. The combined sold callable swaps and callable bonds enable

146


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the Bank to meet its funding needs at lower costs not otherwise directly attainable solely through the issuance ofrelative to similar tenor non-callable debt, while effectively converting the Bank’s net payment to an adjustable rate.

The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, was as follows:
2017
 2016
20212020
Par value of consolidated obligation bonds:   Par value of consolidated obligation bonds:
Non-callable$75,496
 $45,550
Non-callable$8,242 $41,249 
Callable9,612
 4,670
Callable14,620 3,140 
Total par value$85,108
 $50,220
Total par value$22,862 $44,389 

The following is a summary of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next call date.
115

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
2017
 2016
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
20212020
Within 1 year$78,606
 $38,099
Within 1 year$21,770 $36,667 
After 1 year through 2 years5,326
 10,747
After 1 year through 2 years969 7,228 
After 2 years through 3 years935
 743
After 2 years through 3 years72 396 
After 3 years through 4 years85
 455
After 3 years through 4 years— 47 
After 4 years through 5 years55
 85
After 4 years through 5 years— 
After 5 years101
 91
After 5 years48 51 
Total par value$85,108
 $50,220
Total par value$22,862 $44,389 
Consolidated obligation discount notes are consolidated obligations issued to raise short-term funds. These notes are issued at less than their face value and redeemed at par value when they mature. The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation discount notes, all of which are due within one year, was as follows:
 20212020
 Amount
Outstanding
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)
Amount
Outstanding
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)
Par value$23,989 0.04 %$16,217 0.12 %
Unamortized discounts(2)(4)
Total$23,987 $16,213 
 2017 2016
 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)

Par value$30,494
 1.24% $33,529
 0.46%
Unamortized discounts(54)   (23)  
Total$30,440
   $33,506
  

(1)Represents yield to maturity excluding concession fees.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for consolidated obligations at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, are detailed in the following table.


20212020
Par value of consolidated obligations:
Bonds:
Fixed rate$16,654 $6,632 
Adjustable rate5,575 37,712 
Step-up633 45 
Total bonds, par value22,862 44,389 
Discount notes, par value23,989 16,217 
Total consolidated obligations, par value$46,851 $60,606 
147


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



  
2017
 2016
Par value of consolidated obligations:   
Bonds:   
Fixed rate$17,967
 $15,960
Adjustable rate66,276
 33,435
Step-up565
 515
Step-down200
 200
Fixed rate that converts to adjustable rate
 10
Range bonds100
 100
Total bonds, par value85,108
 50,220
Discount notes, par value30,494
 33,529
Total consolidated obligations, par value$115,602
 $83,749

Consolidated obligation bonds may be structured to meet the Bank's or the investors' needs. Common structures include fixed rate bonds with or without call options and adjustable rate bonds with or without embedded options. In general, when bonds are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the consolidated obligation bond. This combination of the consolidated obligation bond and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates an adjustable rate bond. The cost of this funding combination is generally lower than the cost that would be available through the issuance of an adjustable rate bond alone. These transactions generally receive fair value hedge accounting treatment. In addition, when certain consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank has elected the fair value option are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the consolidated obligation bond. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations generally do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment. For more information, see Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 19 – Fair Value.

The Bank did not have any bonds with embedded features that met the requirements to separate the embedded feature from the host contract and designate the embedded feature as a stand-alone derivative at December 31, 20172021 or 2016.2020. The Bank has generally elected to account for certain bonds with embedded features under the fair value option, and these bonds are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. For more information, see Note 1914 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 15 – Fair Value.


Note 139 — Affordable Housing Program


The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish an Affordable Housing Program (AHP).AHP. Each FHLBank provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Annually, the FHLBanks must set aside for their AHPs, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 or 10% of the current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for AHP).


116

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The Bank accrues its AHP assessment monthly based on its net earnings. If the Bank experienced a net loss during a quarter but still had net earnings for the year, the Bank'sBank’s obligation to the AHP would be calculated based on the Bank'sBank’s year-to-date net earnings. If the Bank had net earnings in subsequent quarters, it would be required to contribute additional amounts to meet its calculated annual obligation. If the Bank experienced a net loss for a full year, the amount of the AHP liability would be equal to zero, since each FHLBank'sFHLBank’s required annual AHP contribution is limited to its annual net earnings. However, if the result of the aggregate 10% calculation is less than $100 for the FHLBanks combined, then the FHLBank Act requires that each FHLBank contribute such prorated sums as may be required to ensure that the aggregate contribution of the FHLBanks equals $100. The proration would be made on the basis of an FHLBank'sFHLBank’s income in relation to the income of all the FHLBanks for the previous

148


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



year. There was no AHP shortfall, as described above, in 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, or 2015.2019. If an FHLBank finds that its required AHP assessments are contributing to the financial instability of that FHLBank, it may apply to the Finance Agency for a temporary suspension of its contributions. The Bank did not make such an application in 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, or 2015.2019.


The Bank'sBank’s total AHP assessments equaled $45, $86,$32, $38, and $78$38 during 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. These amounts were charged to earnings each year and recognized as a liability. As subsidies are disbursed, the AHP liability is reduced. The AHP liability was as follows:

202120202019
Balance, beginning of the period$120 $152 $182 
AHP assessments32 38 38 
AHP voluntary contributions— — 
AHP grant payments(37)(70)(70)
Balance, end of the period$115 $120 $152 
 2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$205
 $172
 $147
AHP assessments45
 86
 78
AHP voluntary contributions7
 
 
AHP grant payments(53) (53) (53)
Balance, end of the period$204
 $205
 $172


All subsidies were distributed in the form of direct grants in 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019.



149
117


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







Note 1410 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

The following table summarizes the changes in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015:2019:

Net Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on AFS SecuritiesNet Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on AFS SecuritiesNet Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on HTM SecuritiesPension and Postretirement BenefitsTotal
AOCI
Balance, December 31, 2018$(32)$287 $(3)$(17)$235 
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(6)— (6)
Net change in fair value53 (16)37 
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI— 
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)53 (19)39 
Balance, December 31, 2019$21 $268 $(1)$(14)$274 
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:
Net change in fair value(45)— (45)
Accretion of non-credit loss
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)(45)— — (44)
Adoption of ASU 2016-13, as amended(1)
268 (268)— — — 
Balance, December 31, 2020$244 $— $— $(14)$230 
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits
Net change in fair value96 — 96 
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)96 — — 101 
Balance, December 31, 2021$340 $— $— $(9)$331 
(1)    With the adoption of changes to accounting standards on measurement of credit losses for financial instruments on January 1, 2020, OTTI assessment was replaced with an evaluation for an allowance for credit loss (see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information).

Note 11 — Capital
 Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on AFS Securities
 Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on HTM Securities
 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
 Total
AOCI

Balance, December 31, 2014$88
 $(20) $(12) 56
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    (2) (2)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(18) (1)   (19)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred(1) 1
   
Net change in fair value(29)     (29)
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  6
   6
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI3
 
   3
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)(45) 6
 (2) (41)
Balance, December 31, 2015$43
 $(14) $(14) 15
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    (2) (2)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(17) 
   (17)
Net change in fair value103
     103
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  5
   5
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI7
 
   7
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)93
 5
 (2) 96
Balance, December 31, 2016$136
 $(9) $(16) $111
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    3
 3
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(4) 
   (4)
Net change in fair value195
     195
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  3
   3
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI10
 
   10
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)201
 3
 3
 207
Balance, December 31, 2017$337
 $(6) $(13) $318

Note 15 — Capital

Capital Requirements.The Bank issues only one class of capital stock, Class B stock, with a par value of one hundred dollars$100 per share, which may be redeemed (subject to certain conditions) upon five years' notice by the member to the Bank. In addition, at its discretion, under certain conditions, the Bank may repurchase excess capital stock at any time. (See “Excess Capital Stock” below for more information.) The capital stock may be issued, redeemed, and repurchased only at its stated par value, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank may only redeem or repurchase capital stock from a shareholder if, following the redemption or repurchase,

150


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the shareholder will continue to meet its minimum capital stock requirement and the Bank will continue to meet its regulatory requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital.

Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the Director of the Finance Agency is responsible for setting the risk-based capital standards for the FHLBanks. The FHLBank Act and regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks require that the Bank’s minimum capital stock requirement for shareholders must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet its regulatory requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital. The Bank must maintain: (i) total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least 4% of its total assets, (ii)
118

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




leverage capital in an amount equal to at least 5% of its total assets, and (iii) permanent capital in an amount that is greater than or equal to its risk-based capital requirement.
The Finance Agency requires each FHLBank to maintain a ratio of at least 2% of capital stock to total assets in order to help preserve the cooperative structure incentives that encourage members to remain fully engaged in the oversight of their investment in the FHLBank. The Finance Agency will consider the proportion of capital stock to assets, measured on a daily average basis at monthend, when assessing each FHLBank’s capital management practices. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank complied with this capital guidance.
Because the Bank issues only Class B stock, regulatory capital and permanent capital for the Bank are both composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes). Regulatory capital and permanent capital do not include AOCI. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, weighted by a 1.5 multiplier, plus non-permanent capital.

The risk-based capital requirement is equal to the sum of the Bank’s credit risk, market risk, and operationsoperational risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency. The Finance Agency may require an FHLBank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined.

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Bank was in compliancecomplied with these capital rules and requirements as shown in the following table.
2017 201620212020
Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
RequiredActualRequiredActual
Risk-based capital$2,023
 $6,797
 $2,241
 $5,883
Risk-based capital$1,054 $5,896 $1,404 $5,966 
Total regulatory capital$4,935
 $6,797
 $3,678
 $5,883
Total regulatory capital$2,165 $5,896 $2,745 $5,966 
Total regulatory capital ratio4.00% 5.51% 4.00% 6.40%Total regulatory capital ratio4.00 %10.89 %4.00 %8.69 %
Leverage capital$6,169
 $10,195
 $4,597
 $8,825
Leverage capital$2,706 $8,844 $3,432 $8,949 
Leverage ratio5.00% 8.26% 5.00% 9.60%Leverage ratio5.00 %16.34 %5.00 %13.04 %
The Bank'sBank’s capital plan requires each member to own capital stock in an amount equal to the greater of its membership capital stock requirement or its activity-based capital stock requirement. The Bank may adjust these requirements from time to time within limits established in the capital plan. Any changes to the capital plan must be approved by the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors and the Finance Agency.

A member's membership capital stock requirement is 1.0% of its membership asset value. The membership capital stock requirement for a member is capped at $15. The Bank may adjust the membership capital stock requirement for all members within a range of 0.5% to 1.5% of a member's membership asset value and may adjust the cap for all members within an authorized range of $10 to $50. A member's membership asset value is determined by multiplying the amount of the member's membership assets by the applicable membership asset factors. Membership assets are generally defined as assets (other than Bank capital stock) of a type that could qualify as collateral to secure a member's indebtedness to the Bank under applicable law, whether or not the assets are pledged to the Bank or accepted by the Bank as eligible collateral. The membership asset factors were initially based on the typical borrowing capacity percentages generally assigned by the Bank to the same types of assets when pledged to the Bank (although the factors may differ from the actual borrowing capacities, if any, assigned to particular assets pledged by a specific member at any point in time).

A member's activity-based capital stock requirement is the sum of 2.7% of the member's outstanding advances, plus 0.1% of notional balances for outstanding letters of credit, plus 0.0% of any portion of any mortgage loan purchased and held by the Bank. The Bank may adjust the activity-based capital stock requirement for all members within a
119

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




range of 2.0% to 5.0% of the member's outstanding advances, a range of 0.1% to 1.0% of the member’s outstanding letters of credit, and a range of 0.0% to 5.0% of any portion of any mortgage loan purchased and held by the Bank.

151


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Any member may withdraw from membership and, subject to certain statutory and regulatory restrictions, have its capital stock redeemed after giving the required notice. Members that withdraw from membership may not reapply for membership for five years, in accordance with Finance Agency rules.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The Bank reclassifies the capital stock subject to redemption from capital to a liability after a member provides the Bank with a written notice of redemption; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity, resulting in the member's shares then meeting the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reflected as interest expense in the Statements of Income. The repayment of these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments (by repurchase or redemption of the shares) is reflected as a financing cash outflow in the Statements of Cash Flows once settled.

The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure under which members, former members, and certain other nonmembers own the Bank'sBank’s capital stock. Former members and certain other nonmembers are required to maintain their investment in the Bank's capital stock until their outstanding transactions are paid off or until their capital stock is redeemed following the relevant five-year redemption period for capital stock or is repurchased by the Bank, in accordance with the Bank's capital requirements. Capital stock cannot be issued, repurchased, redeemed, or transferred except between the Bank and its members (or their affiliates and successors) at the capital stock's par value of one hundred dollars$100 per share. If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal or if the Bank allows the transfer of mandatorily redeemable capital stock to a member, the Bank reclassifies mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

The Bank will not redeem or repurchase capital stock required to meet the minimum capital stock requirement until five years after the member's membership is terminated or after the Bank receives notice of the member's withdrawal, and the Bank will redeem or repurchase only the amounts that are in excess of the capital stock required to support activity (advances and mortgage loans) that may remain outstanding after the five-year redemption period has expired. In both cases, the Bank will only redeem or repurchase capital stock if certain statutory and regulatory conditions are met. In accordance with the Bank'sBank’s current practice, if activity-based capital stock becomes excess capital stock because an activity no longer remains outstanding, the Bank may repurchase the excess activity-based capital stock at its discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory conditions, on a scheduled quarterly basis.conditions.

The Bank had mandatorily redeemable capital stock totaling $309$3 outstanding to seven3 institutions at December 31, 2017,2021, and $457$2 outstanding to sixthree institutions at December 31, 2016.2020. The change in mandatorily redeemable capital stock for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, was as follows:
 2017
 2016
 2015
Balance at the beginning of the period$457
 $488
 $719
Reclassified from/(to) capital during the period(1)
2
 56
 415
Redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(75) (28) (53)
Repurchase of excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock(75) (59) (593)
Balance at the end of the period$309
 $457
 $488

(1)The Bank reclassified $403 of capital stock to mandatorily redeemable capital stock (a liability) on September 1, 2015, as a result of the merger of JPMorgan B&T with an into JPMorgan Chase, a nonmember of the Bank.

 202120202019
Balance at the beginning of the period$$138 $227 
Reclassified from/(to) capital during the period25 40 
Repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(24)(176)(95)
Balance at the end of the period$$$138 
Cash dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock were recorded as interest expense in theof a de minimis amount, of $32, $60,$5, and $65$14 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

The following table presents mandatorily redeemable capital stock amounts by contractual redemption period at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Contractual Redemption Period20212020
After 4 years through 5 years$$— 
Past contractual redemption date because of remaining activity(1)
Total$$
(1)    Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because of outstanding activity.
152
120


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)








The following table presents mandatorily redeemable capital stock amounts by contractual redemption period at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Contractual Redemption Period2017
 2016
After 2 years through 3 years$306
 $
After 3 years through 4 years
 379
Past contractual redemption date because of remaining activity(1)
3
 78
Total$309
 $457

(1)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because of outstanding activity.

A member may cancel its notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal from membership by providing written notice to the Bank prior to the end of the relevant five-year redemption period or the membership termination date. If the Bank receives the notice of cancellation within 30 months following the notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the member is charged a fee equal to fifty cents multiplied by the number of shares of capital stock affected. If the Bank receives the notice of cancellation more than 30 months following the notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal (or if the Bank does not redeem the member's capital stock because following the redemption the member would fail to meet its minimum capital stock requirement), the member is charged a fee equal to one dollar multiplied by the number of shares of capital stock affected. In certain cases, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors may waive a cancellation fee for bona fide business purposes.

The Bank'sBank’s capital stock is considered putable by the shareholder. There are significant statutory and regulatory restrictions on the Bank'sBank’s obligation or ability to redeem outstanding capital stock, which include the following:
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, the Bank would fail to meet its minimum capital requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital. All of the Bank'sBank’s capital stock immediately becomes nonredeemable if the Bank fails to meet its minimum capital requirements.
The Bank may not be able to redeem any capital stock if either its Boardboard of Directorsdirectors or the Finance Agency determines that it has incurred or is likely to incur losses resulting in or expected to result in a charge against capital that would have any of the following effects: cause the Bank not to comply with its regulatory capital requirements, result in negative retained earnings, or otherwise create an unsafe and unsound condition at the Bank.
In addition to being able to prohibit capital stock redemptions, the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors has a right to call for additional capital stock purchases by its members, as a condition of continuing membership, as needed for the Bank to satisfy its statutory and regulatory capital requirements.
If, during the period between receipt of a capital stock redemption notice and the actual redemption (a period that could last indefinitely), the Bank becomes insolvent and is either liquidated or merged with another FHLBank, the redemption value of the capital stock will be established either through the liquidation or the merger process. If the Bank is liquidated, after satisfaction of the Bank'sBank’s obligations to creditors and to the extent funds are then available, each shareholder will be entitled to receive the par value of its capital stock as well as any retained earnings in an amount proportional to the shareholder's share of the total shares of capital stock, subject to any limitations that may be imposed by the Finance Agency. In the event of a merger or consolidation, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors will determine the rights and preferences of the Bank's shareholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations issued by the Office of Finance has not been paid in full.
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the Bank fails to provide the Finance Agency with the quarterly certification required by Finance Agency rules prior to declaring or paying dividends for a quarter.
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the Bank is unable to provide the required quarterly certification, projects that it will fail to comply with statutory or regulatory liquidity requirements or will be unable to fully meet all of its obligations on a timely basis, actually fails to satisfy these requirements or

153


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



obligations, or negotiates to enter or enters into an agreement with another FHLBank to obtain financial assistance to meet its current obligations.

Mandatorily redeemable capital stock is considered capital for determining the Bank's compliance with its regulatory capital requirements. Based on Finance Agency interpretation, the classification of certain shares of the Bank'sBank’s capital stock as mandatorily redeemable does not affect the definition of total capital for purposes of: determining the Bank'sBank’s compliance with its regulatory capital requirements, calculating its mortgage-backed securities investment authority (300% of total capital), calculating its unsecured credit exposure to other GSEs (limited to 100% of total capital), or calculating its unsecured credit limits to other counterparties (various percentages of total capital depending on the rating of the counterparty).

121

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework. By Finance Agency regulation, dividends may be paid only out of current net earnings or previously retained earnings. As required by the Finance Agency, the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) summarizes the Bank’s capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices, with respect to retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock.The Bank may be restricted from paying dividends if the Bank is not in compliance with any of its minimum capital requirements or if payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its minimum capital requirements. In addition, the Bank may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, or, under certain circumstances, if the Bank fails to satisfy certain liquidity requirements under applicable Finance Agency regulations.

The Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors reviews the Framework at least annually and may amend the Framework from time to time. In January 2017, theThe Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to includeincludes a dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%, which was intended to be considered by the Bank’s Board of Directors beginning with the Bank’s second quarter 2017 dividend declaration.. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate areis at the discretion of the Bank’s Boardboard of Directors,directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration.

The Board may also revise or eliminate the dividend policy in the future. The Bank’s historical dividend rates and the dividend philosophy are not indicative of future dividend declarations.
The Bank’s Risk Management Policy limits the payment of dividends if the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock falls below certain levels. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is less than 100% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month LIBORFederal funds effective rate for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and if this ratio is less than 70%, the Bank would be restricted from paying a dividend. The ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock was 207%310% as of December 31, 2017.

2021.
In addition, the Bank monitors theits financial condition, of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of totalfinancial performance, its capital to par value of capital stock, itsposition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets,market conditions, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock each quarter.in future quarters.

Retained Earnings – The Bank’s Framework assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period, and maintains an amount of total retained earnings at least equal to its required retained earnings as described in the Framework. Prior to July 2017, the Bank’s Framework had three categories of restricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount), and the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE Agreement). Under the Framework, the Bank’s required amount of restricted retained earnings was determined using the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, from July 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,000, and from January 2017 to July 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.


154


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



In July 2017, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved the transfer of all amounts classified as restricted retained earnings, other than the amounts related to the JCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change related to the transfer, the Bank’s Board of Directors amended the Framework to eliminate two of the categories of restricted retained earnings (Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the Bank’s retained earnings methodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance,had ranged from $1,500 to $2,900 during 2020 and business growth. In January 2018,2021. The methodology may be revised from time to time, and the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of totalrequired retained earnings under the methodology may change due to updating data and assumptions used in the methodology. In January 2022, the required level of $2,500.retained earnings was increased from $1,500 to $1,728. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCEJoint Capital Enhancement (JCE) Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

The Bank’s retained earnings requirement may be changed at any time. The Boardboard of Directorsdirectors periodically reviews the retained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate.

The JCE Agreement is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to allocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of the account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least 1% of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previouscalendar quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends.

The following tables summarize With the activity relateddecline in consolidated obligations outstanding in 2020, the Bank ceased contributions to restricted retained earnings forin the years ended fourth quarter of 2020, in accordance with the JCE Agreement, and no further allocations of net income into restricted retained earnings are required until such time as the allocation requirement exceeds the balance of restricted retained earnings. Additionally, the JCE Agreement provides that amounts in restricted retained earnings in excess of 150% of the Bank’s restricted retained earnings minimum (i.e., 1% of the Bank’s total consolidated obligations calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter) may be released from restricted
122

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




retained earnings. As a result of the Bank exceeding this threshold, the Bank reclassified $53 from restricted retained earnings to unrestricted retained earnings during 2021. The Bank’s restricted retained earnings totaled $708 and $761 at December 31, 20172021 and 2016:2020, respectively. The Bank’s unrestricted retained earnings totaled $3,124 and $2,919 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
   Restricted Retained Earnings Related to:  
 Unrestricted Retained Earnings
 Valuation Adjustments
 Other
 Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement
 Total Restricted Retained Earnings
 Total Retained Earnings
Balance, December 31, 2015$610
 $10
 $1,650
 $358
 $2,018
 $2,628
Net income562
 8
 
 142
 150
 712
Cash dividends on capital stock(284)       

 (284)
Balance, December 31, 2016$888
 $18
 $1,650
 $500
 $2,168
 $3,056
Net income198
 3
 100
 75
 178
 376
Cash dividends on capital stock(187)       

 (187)
Transfers from restricted retained earnings1,771
 (21) (1,750) 
 (1,771) 
Balance, December 31, 2017$2,670
 $
 $
 $575
 $575
 $3,245

Dividend Payments – Finance Agency rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. There is no requirement that the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

In addition, Finance Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess
capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan. AsExcess capital stock totaled $120, or 0.22% of total assets as of December 31, 2017, the Bank’s excess2021. Excess capital stock totaled $493,$161, or 0.40%0.23% of total assets.

assets as of December 31, 2020.
In 2017,2021, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.50%5.74%, totaling $219,$135, including $187$135 in dividends on capital stock and $32a de minimis amount in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. In 2016,2020, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 12.33%5.53%, totaling $344,$164, including $284$159 in dividends on capital stock and $60$5 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends paid in 2016 included four quarterly dividends and a special

155


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



dividend in the amount of $100, including $83 on capital stock and $17 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

For the periods referenced above, the Bank paid dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

On February 21, 2018,16, 2022, the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 20172021 at an annualized rate of 7.00%6.00%, totaling $59, including $53 in dividends on capital stock and $6 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.$35. The Bank recorded the dividend on February 21, 2018. The Bank16, 2022, and expects to pay the dividend on March 15, 2018. Dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock will be recognized as interest expense in the first quarter of 2018.10, 2022.

Excess Capital Stock – The Bank’s capital plan provides that the Bank may repurchase some or all of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, including any excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank must give the shareholder 15 days’ written notice; however, the shareholder may waive this notice period. The Bank may also repurchase all of a member’s excess capital stock at a member’s request, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. A shareholder’s excess capital stock is defined as any capital stock holdings in excess of the shareholder’s minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan. The Bank’s practice is to repurchase the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all former members on a daily schedule. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement. The Bank calculates the amount of stock to be repurchased each business day based on the shareholder’s capital stock outstanding after all stock transactions are completed for the day, ensuring that each member and former member would continue to meet its minimum capital stock requirement after the repurchase. The Bank may change this practice at any time. The Bank repurchased $414$1,630 and $812$1,641 in excess capital stock during 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

The Bank is required to redeem any mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is in excess of a former member’s minimum stock requirement on or after the expiration of the five-year redemption date. During 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Bank redeemed $75$1 and $28,a de minimis amount, respectively, in mandatorily redeemable capital stock, for which the five-year redemption period had expired, at its $100 par value.value per share. The stock was redeemed on the scheduled redemption dates or, for stock that was not excess stock on its scheduled redemption date because of outstanding activity with the Bank, on the first available repurchase date after the stock was no longer required to support outstanding activity with the Bank.

The Framework sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion and subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the Bank’s Risk Management Policy and capital plan limitations. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement. In addition, at the Bank’s discretion, all of the excess stock held by a member may be repurchased upon request of a member, subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. In accordance with the Framework, each quarter Bank management evaluates and determines the amount of capital stock to be repurchased in that quarter, if any, giving consideration to certain capital metrics and capital management objectives and strategies, and subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. At least 15 calendar days before any repurchase, the Bank will notify shareholders of its intention to repurchase capital stock and of the scheduled repurchase date. On the scheduled repurchase date, the Bank will calculate the amount of stock to be repurchased to ensure that each member and nonmember shareholder will continue to meet its minimum stock requirement after the repurchase.

On February 21, 2018, the Bank announced that it plans to repurchase the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 16, 2018.

Excess capital stock totaled $493 as of December 31, 2017, which included surplus capital stock of $317. Excess capital stock totaled $488 as of December 31, 2016, which included surplus capital stock of $325.


156123


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







Concentration. The following table presents No institution held 10% or more of the concentration inBank’s outstanding capital stock, as of December 31, 2021. First Republic Bank held by institutions whose capital stock ownership represented 10%$354, or more16%, of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of December 31, 20172020. No other institution held 10% or 2016.more of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2020.

 2017 2016
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Charles Schwab Bank$405
 11% $81
 3%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
307
 9
 400
 14
Subtotal712
 20
 481
 17
Others2,840
 80
 2,346
 83
Total$3,552
 100% $2,827
 100%

(1)The capital stock held by this nonmember institution is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Note 1612 — Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans


Defined Benefit Plans

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan. The Bank provides retirement benefits through a Bank-sponsored Cash Balance Plan, a qualified defined benefit plan. The Cash Balance Plan is provided to all employees who have completed six months of Bank service. Under the plan, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, each eligible Bank employee accruesaccrued benefits annually equal to 6% of the employee's annual compensation, plus 6% interest on the benefits accrued to the employee through the prior yearend. The Cash Balance Plan is funded through a qualified trust established by the Bank.

Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans. The Bank sponsors the following non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans:
Benefit Equalization Plan, a non-qualified retirement plan restoring benefits offered under the Cash Balance Plan that are limited by laws governing the plan. See below for further discussion of the defined contribution portion of the Benefit Equalization Plan.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP),a non-qualified unfunded retirement benefit plan available to the Bank's eligible senior officers, which generally provides a service-linked supplemental cash balance annual contribution credit to SERP participants and an annual interest credit of 6% on the benefits accrued to the SERP participants through the prior yearend.
Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified retirement plan available to all eligible Bank officers,employees, which provides make-up pensionretirement benefits that would have been earned under the Cash Balance Plan had the compensation not been deferred. The make-up benefits vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Cash Balance Plan. See below for further discussion of the defined contribution portion of the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Postretirement Health Benefit Plan. The Bank provides a postretirement health benefit plan to employees hired before January 1, 2003. The Bank's costs are capped at 1998 health care premium amounts. As a result, changesthat meet certain eligibility criteria. Changes in health care cost trend rates will not have noa material effect on the Bank's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or service and interest costs.

costs because benefit plan premiums are generally paid by the retirees.
The following table summarizespresents the changesfair value of plan assets as well as the funded status that is recognized in other assets/(liabilities) in the benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded statusStatements of Condition for the defined benefit Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan for the years endedat December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

20212020
Cash Balance
Plan
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit PlanCash Balance
Plan
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Fair value of plan assets$93 $— $— $86 $— $— 
Funded status12 (17)(2)(21)(2)

Amounts recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2021 and 2020, consist of:
157
124


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Change in benefit obligation           
Benefit obligation, beginning of the period$51
 $21
 $2
 $46
 $24
 $2
Service cost3
 2
 
 3
 1
 
Interest cost2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
Actuarial (gain)/loss2
 
 
 2
 1
 
Settlements
 (3) 
 
 (6) 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Benefit obligation, end of the period57
 21
 2
 51
 21
 2
Change in plan assets           
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of the period53
 
 
 43
 
 
Actual return on plan assets9
 
 
 3
 
 
Settlements
 (3) 
 
 (6) 
Employer contributions2
 3
 
 8
 6
 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of the period63
 
 
 53
 
 
Funded status at the end of the period$6
 $(21) $(2) $2
 $(21) $(2)

Amounts recognized in the Statements of Condition at December 31, 2017 and 2016, consist of:

 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Other assets/(liabilities)$6
 $(21) $(2) $2
 $(21) $(2)

Amounts recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2017 and 2016, consist of:

 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net loss/(gain)$11
 $3
 $(1) $14
 $3
 $(1)

20212020
Cash Balance
Plan
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit PlanCash Balance
Plan
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net loss/(gain)$$$(1)$14 $$(1)
The following table presents information for pensionretirement plans with assets in excess of benefit obligations and for pensionretirement plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.


158


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017 2016
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Projected benefit obligation$57
 $21
 $2
 $51
 $21
 $2
Accumulated benefit obligation56
 20
 2
 50
 21
 2
Fair value of plan assets63
 
 
 53
 
 

Components of the net periodic benefit costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, were as follows:

 2017 2016 2015
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net periodic benefit cost/(income)                 
Service cost$3
 $2
 $
 $3
 $1
 $
 $3
 $1
 $
Interest cost2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
 2
 1
 
Expected return on plan assets(4) 
 
 (3) 
 
 (3) 
 
Amortization of net loss/(gain)1
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
 (1)
Settlement loss
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost2
 3
 
 2
 3
 
 2
 3
 (1)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income                 
Net loss/(gain)(2) 
 
 3
 1
 
 3
 (1) 
Amortization of net loss/(gain)(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
 
 (1) 1
Prior service cost recognized due to settlement loss
 
 
 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income(3)



 2
 
 
 3
 (2) 1
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$(1) $3
 $
 $4
 $3
 $
 $5
 $1
 $

The amounts in AOCI expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in 2018 are de minimis.
Weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at December 31, 2017 and 2016, for the Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan were as follows:

 2017 2016
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 
Post-
retirement
Health
Benefit
Plan

 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Discount rate3.25% 3.25% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 4.00%
Rate of salary increase3.00% through 2018, 4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2018, 4.00% thereafter
 
 3.00% through 2017
4.00% thereafter

 3.00% through 2017
4.00% thereafter

 


159


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, for the Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan were as follows:

 2017 2016 2015
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Discount rate3.50% 3.50% 4.00% 3.75% 3.75% 4.00% 3.50% 3.50% 3.75%
Rate of salary increase3.00% through 2017, 4.00% thereafter 3.00% through 2017, 4.00% thereafter 
 3.00% through 2016 4.00% thereafter 3.00% through 2016 4.00% thereafter 
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 
Expected return on plan assets7.75% 
 
 7.75% 
 
 8.00% 
 

20212020
Cash Balance PlanNon-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit PlanCash Balance PlanNon-Qualified Defined Benefit PlansPost-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Projected benefit obligation$81 $17 $$79 $21 $
Accumulated benefit obligation81 16 78 20 
Fair value of plan assets93 — — 86 — — 
The Bank uses a discount rate to determine the present value of its future benefit obligations. The discount rate was determined based on the CitigroupFinancial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) Pension Discount Curve at the measurement date. The CitigroupFTSE Pension Discount Curve is a yield curve that reflects the market-observed yields for high-quality fixed income securities for each maturity. The projected benefit payments for each year from the plan are discounted using the spot rates on the yield curve to derive a single equivalent discount rate. The discount rate is reset annually on the measurement date.

The expected return ondiscount rate used to determine the benefit obligations for the Cash Balance Plan and non-qualified defined benefit plans was 2.25% for 2021 and 1.75% for 2020. The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligations for the post-retirement health benefit plan assets was determined based on: (i) the historical returns2.50% for each asset class, (ii) the expected future long-term returns2021 and 2.25% for these asset classes, and (iii) the plan's target asset allocation.

2020.
The table below presents the fair values of the Cash Balance Plan's assets as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by asset category. See Note 1915 – Fair Value for further information regarding the three levels of fair value measurement.

20212020
Fair Value Measurement Using:Fair Value Measurement Using:
Asset CategoryLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Cash and cash equivalents$$— $— $$$— $— $
Equity mutual funds58 — — 58 55 — — 55 
Fixed income mutual funds27 — — 27 23 — — 23 
Real estate mutual funds— — — — 
Other mutual funds— — — — 
Total$93 $— $— $93 $86 $— $— $86 
 2017 2016
 Fair Value Measurement Using:   Fair Value Measurement Using:  
Asset CategoryLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
 $
 $1
 $1
 $
 $
 $1
Equity mutual funds40
 
 
 40
 32
 
 
 32
Fixed income mutual funds18
 
 
 18
 16
 
 
 16
Real estate mutual funds2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
 2
Other mutual funds2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
 2
Total$63
 $
 $
 $63
 $53
 $
 $
 $53

The Cash Balance Plan is administered by the Bank's Retirement Committee, which establishes the plan's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives. The Retirement Committee has adopted a strategic asset allocation based on a stable distribution of assets among major asset classes. These asset classes include domestic large-, mid-, and small-capitalization equity investments; international equity investments; real return investments; and fixed income investments. The Retirement Committee has set the Cash Balance Plan's target allocation percentages for a mix of 60% equity, 10% real return, and 30% fixed income. The Retirement Committee reviews the performance of the Cash Balance Plan on a regular basis.

The Cash Balance Plan's weighted average asset allocation at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by asset category was as follows:

160125


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)








Asset Category2017
 2016
Asset Category20212020
Cash and cash equivalents2% 3%Cash and cash equivalents%%
Equity mutual funds63
 61
Equity mutual funds63 64 
Fixed income mutual funds28
 29
Fixed income mutual funds29 27 
Real estate mutual funds4
 4
Real estate mutual funds
Other mutual funds3
 3
Other mutual funds
Total100% 100%Total100 %100 %
The Bank contributed $2made 0 contributions in 20172021 and expects to contribute $3 in 20182022 to the Cash Balance Plan. The Bank contributed $3$6 in 20172021 and expects to contribute a de minimis amount$1 in 20182022 to the non-qualified defined benefit plans and postretirement health benefit plan.

The following are the estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate:

Year
Cash Balance
Plan

 
Non-Qualified
Defined Benefit
Plans

 
Postretirement
Health Benefit
Plan

2018$4
 $
 $
20194
 5
 
20204
 
 
20214
 1
 
202216
 6
 
2023 – 202720
 14
 1

YearCash Balance
Plan
Non-Qualified
Defined Benefit
Plans
Postretirement
Health Benefit
Plan
2022$$$— 
2023— 
2024— 
2025— 
202628 — 
2027 – 203123 
Defined Contribution Plans

Retirement Savings Plan. The Bank sponsors a qualified defined contribution retirement 401(k) savings plan, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco Savings Plan (Savings Plan). Contributions to the Savings Plan consist of elective participant contributions of up to 20%75% of each participant's base compensation and a Bank matching contribution of up to 6% of each participant's base compensation. The Bank contributed approximately $2, $2,$3, $3, and $2 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

Benefit Equalization Plan. The Bank sponsors a non-qualified retirement plan restoring benefits offered under the Savings Plan that have been limited by laws governing the plan. Contributions made during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, were de minimis.

Deferred Compensation Plan. The Bank maintains a deferred compensation plan that is available to all eligible Bank officers.employees. The defined contribution portion of the plan is comprisedconsists of two components: (i) officeremployee or director deferral of current compensation, and (ii) make-up matching contributions for officersemployees that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the compensation not been deferred. The make-up benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan liability consists of the accumulated compensation deferrals and accrued earnings on the deferrals, as well as the make-up matching contributions and any accrued earnings on the contributions. The Bank'sBank’s obligation for this plan at December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, was $44, $37,$64, $57, and $35,$49, respectively.

Incentive Compensation Plans

The Bank provides incentive compensation plans for many of its employees, including senior officers. Other liabilities include $13$14 and $13$17 for incentive compensation at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.


161
126


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







Note 1713 — Segment Information

The Bank uses an analysis of financial results based on the financial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to the operations of these two2 business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges that are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” in other income/(loss), excludes interest income and expense associated with changes in fair value from fair value hedges that are recorded in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item, and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI losses on the Bank’s PLRMBS, other expenses, andAHP assessments isare not included in the segment reporting analysis but isare incorporated into the Bank’s overall assessment of financial performance.

The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging
instruments, other non-MBS investments associated with the Bank'sBank’s role as a liquidity provider, and capital.
Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield
on all assets associated with the business activities in this segment and the cost of funding those activities, including
the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements, and from earnings on invested capital.

attributed to the Bank’s capital stock and retained earnings.
The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the MPF Program,
the consolidated obligations specifically identified as funding those assets, and related hedging instruments.
Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield
on the MBS and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets. This includes the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements and net accretion related income, which is a result of improvement in expected cash flows on certain other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS that were other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2020, less the provision for credit losses on mortgage loans.loans and MBS.

The following table presents the Bank’s adjusted net interest income by operating segment and reconciles total adjusted net interest income to income before the AHP assessment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019.
127
 
Advances-
Related
Business

 
Mortgage-
Related
Business(1)

 
Adjusted
Net
Interest
Income

 
Amortization
of Basis
Adjustments(2)

 

Income/(Expense)
on Economic
Hedges(3)

 
Interest
Expense on
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital
Stock(4)

 
Net
Interest
Income After Mortgage Loan Loss Provision

 
Other
Income/
(Loss)

 
Other
Expense

 
Income
Before AHP
Assessment

2017$234
 $325
 $559
 $
 $(40) $32
 $567
 $78
 $224
 $421
2016154
 338
 492
 (7) (32) 60
 471
 485
 158
 798
2015155
 351
 506
 (17) (18) 65
 476
 388
 148
 716

(1)The mortgage-related business includes total accretion or amortization associated with other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS, which are recognized in interest income, totaled $93, $101, and $82 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The mortgage-related business does not include credit-related OTTI losses of $16, $16, and $15 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Represents amortization of amounts deferred for adjusted net interest income purposes only, in accordance with the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.
(3)
The Bank includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges in adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its two operating segments. For financial reporting purposes, the Bank does not include these amounts in net interest income in the Statements of Income, but instead records them in other income in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.”
(4)
The Bank excludes interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock from adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its two operating segments.

The following table presents total assets by operating segment at December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

162


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







 
Advances-
Related
Business(1)
Mortgage-
Related
Business(2)
Adjusted
Net
Interest
Income(1)
Amortization of Basis
Adjustments and (Gain)/Loss on Fair Value Hedges(1)(3)

Income/(Expense)
on Economic
Hedges(4)
Interest
Expense on
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital
Stock(5)
Net
Interest
Income After Provision for/(Reversal of) Credit Losses
Other
Income/
(Loss)
Other
Expense
Income/(Loss)
Before AHP
Assessment
2021$198 $258 $456 $(1)$(71)$— $528 $(50)$159 $319 
2020267 208 475 74 (83)479 59 165 373 
2019312 256 568 39 (16)14 531 21 187 365 
(1)    Amounts have been corrected to properly disclose the classification of amortization of basis adjustments and certain fees on prepaid advances within adjusted net interest income of the advances-related business segment and within amortization of basis adjustments. The Bank previously disclosed in “Note 10 - Segment Information” in the Bank’s 2020 Form 10-K adjusted net interest income totaling $455 and $563 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. These amounts should have been disclosed as $475 and $568, respectively. These revisions had no effect on total assets, net interest income, or net income of the Bank reported for all affected periods.
(2)    The mortgage-related business includes total accretion or amortization associated with other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS, which are recognized in interest income, totaled $70, $70, and $78 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 respectively. The mortgage-related business includes a provision for/(reversal of) credit losses totaled $(6) and $26 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The mortgage-related business does not include credit-related net OTTI loss of $11 for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3)    Represents amortization of amounts deferred for adjusted net interest income purposes only and changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk for designated fair value hedges recorded in net interest income.
(4)    The Bank includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges in adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its 2 operating segments. For financial reporting purposes, the Bank does not include these amounts in net interest income in the Statements of Income, but instead records them in other income/(loss) in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives.”
(5)    The Bank excludes interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock from adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its 2 operating segments.
The following table presents total assets by operating segment at December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.

Advances-
Related Business
Mortgage-
Related Business
Total
Assets
December 31, 2021$40,064 $14,057 $54,121 
December 31, 202050,876 17,758 68,634 
December 31, 201985,709 21,133 106,842 

  
Advances-
Related Business

 
Mortgage-
Related Business

 
Total
Assets

2017$103,426
 $19,959
 $123,385
201674,018
 17,923
 91,941
201569,047
 16,651
 85,698

Note 1814 — Derivatives and Hedging Activities

General. The Bank may enter into interest rate swaps (including callable, putable, and basis swaps); and cap and floor agreements (collectively, interest rate exchange agreements or derivatives). Most of the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements are executed in conjunction with the origination of advances or the issuance of consolidated obligation bondsobligations to create variable rate structures. The interest rate exchange agreements are generally executed at the same time the advances and bondsconsolidated obligations are transacted and generally have the same maturity dates as the related advances and bonds.hedged instrument. The Bank transacts most of its derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute consolidated obligations. Over-the-counter derivativesDerivatives may be either uncleared or cleared. In an uncleared derivative transaction, the Bank’s counterparty is the executing bank or broker-dealer. In a cleared derivative transaction, the Bank may execute the transaction either directly with thean executing bank or broker-dealer, either on or onoff a swap execution facility, but in either case, the Bank’s counterparty is a derivatives clearing organization or clearinghouse(clearinghouse) once the derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing. The Bank is not a derivatives dealer and does not trade derivatives for short-term profit.

Additional uses of interest rate exchange agreements include: (i) offsetting embedded features in assets and liabilities, (ii) hedging anticipated issuance of debt, (iii) matching against consolidated obligation discount notes or bonds to create the equivalent of callable or non-callable fixed rate debt, (iv) modifying the repricing frequency of assets and liabilities, (v) matching against certain advances and consolidated obligations for which the Bank elected the fair value option, and (vi) exactly offsetting other derivatives cleared at a derivatives clearing organization.clearinghouse. The Bank’s use of interest rate
128

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




exchange agreements results in one of the following classifications: (i) a fair value hedge of an underlying financial instrument or (ii) an economic hedge of assets, or liabilities, or (iii) an intermediary transaction for members.

other derivatives.
The Bank primarily uses the following derivativeinterest rate exchange agreement instruments:

Interest Rate Swaps – An interest rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be paid and the manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. One of the simplest forms of an interest rate swap involves the promise by one party to pay cash flows equivalent to the interest on a notional principal amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a given period of time. In return for this promise, the party receives cash flows equivalent to the interest on the same notional principal amount at a variable rate for the same period of time. The variable rate received or paid by the Bank in most interest rate exchange agreements is either indexed to LIBORbased on a daily repricing index, such as SOFR or to the overnight index swapeffective Fed Funds rate.

Interest Rate Caps and Floors – In a cap agreement, additional cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable rate rises above a certain threshold (or cap) price. In a floor agreement, additional cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable rate falls below a certain threshold (or floor) price. Caps and floors may be used in conjunction with assets or liabilities. In general, caps and floors are designed as protection against the interest rate on a variable rate asset or liability rising above or falling below a certain level.

Hedging Activities. The Bank documents at inception all relationships between derivatives designated as hedging instruments and hedged items, its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions, and its method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Derivatives designated as fair value hedges may be transacted to hedge: (i) assets and liabilities on the Statement of Condition, (ii) firm commitments, or (iii) forecasted transactions. The Bank also formally assesses (both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the hedging

163


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



derivatives have been effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain effective hedges in future periods. The Bank typically uses regression analyses or other statistical analyses to assess the effectiveness of its hedges. When it is determined that a derivative has not been or is not expected to be effective as a hedge, the Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

The Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (ii) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; (v) it determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate; or (vi) it decides to use the derivative to offset changes in the fair value of other derivatives or instruments carried at fair value.

The Bank may have the following types of hedged items:

InvestmentsThe Bank may invest in U.S. Treasury and agency obligations as well as agency MBS, and the taxable portion of highly rated state or local housing finance agency obligations.MBS. In the past, the Bank has also invested in PLRMBS rated AAA at the time of acquisition. The interest rate and prepayment risk associated with these investment securities is managed through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank may manage prepayment risk and interest rate risk by funding investment securities with consolidated obligations that have call features or by hedging the prepayment risk with a combination of consolidated obligations and callable swaps. The Bank may execute callable swaps in conjunction with the issuance of certain liabilities to create funding that is economically equivalent to fixed rate callable debt. Although these derivatives are economic hedges against prepayment risk and are designated to individual liabilities, they do not receive either fair value or cash flow hedge accounting treatment. Investment securities may be classified as trading, AFS, or HTM.

The Bank may also manage the risk arising from changing market prices or cash flows of investment securities classified as trading or AFS by entering into interest rate exchange agreements (economic hedges) that offset the changes in fair value or cash flows of the securities. TheHedge relationships that involve trading securities are designated as economic hedges, while hedge relationships that involve AFS securities are designated as fair value hedges. For trading securities that have been designated as an economic hedge, the market value changes of both the trading securities and the associated interest rate exchange agreements are included in other incomeincome/(loss) in the Statements of Income.

129

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




For AFS securities that have been hedged and qualify as a fair value hedge, the Bank records the portion of the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in interest income together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative, and records the remainder of the change in the fair value of the investment in AOCI as “Net unrealized gain/(loss) on AFS securities.”
Advances The Bank offers a wide range of advances structures to meet members’ funding needs. These advances may have maturities up to 30 years with fixed or adjustable rates and may include early termination features or options. The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and options characteristics of advances to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed rate advance, fixed rate advance with embedded options, or a variable rate advance with embedded options, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and any embedded options in the advance. The combination of the advance and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates a variable rate asset.

In addition, for certain Fixed rate advances for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, the Bank will simultaneously executewithout options that are offset with an interest rate exchange agreement are generally treated as fair value hedges. Advances with terms thatembedded options are recorded using the fair value option and are economically offset the terms of the advance.hedged using interest rate exchange agreements.

Mortgage LoansThe Bank’s investment portfolio includes fixed rate mortgage loans. The prepayment options embedded in mortgage loans can result in extensions or contractions in the expected repayment of these investments, depending on changes in estimated prepayment speeds. The Bank manages the interest rate risk and prepayment risk associated with fixed rate mortgage loans through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank uses both callable and non-callable debt to achieve cash flow patterns and market value sensitivities for liabilities similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. Net income could be reduced if the Bank replaces prepaid mortgage loans with lower-yielding assets and the Bank’s higher funding costs are not reduced accordingly.


164


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank executesmay execute callable swaps in conjunction with the issuance of certainshort-term or adjustable rate consolidated obligations to create funding that is economically equivalent to fixed rate callable bonds. Although these derivatives areThis type of hedge is treated as an economic hedges against the prepayment risk of specific loan pools and are referenced to individual liabilities, they do not receive either fair value or cash flow hedge accounting treatment.hedge.

Consolidated Obligations – Consolidated obligation bonds may be structured to meet the Bank’s or the investors’ needs. Common structures include fixed rate bonds with or without call options and adjustable rate bonds with or without embedded options. In general, when bonds are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the consolidated obligation bond. This combination of the consolidated obligation bond and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates an adjustable rate bond. The cost of this funding combination is generally lower than the cost that would be available through the issuance of an adjustable rate bond alone. These transactions generally receive fair value hedge accounting treatment.

When the Bank issues consolidated obligation discount notes, it may also simultaneously enter into an interest rate exchange agreement to convert the fixed rate discount note to an adjustable rate discount note. This type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge.

In addition, when certain consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank has elected the fair value option are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the consolidated obligation bond. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment.

Intermediation and Offsetting Derivatives As an additional service to its members, the Bank has in the past entered into offsetting interest rate exchange agreements, acting as an intermediary between offsetting derivative transactions with members and other counterparties. This intermediation allows members indirect access to the derivatives market. The Bank also enters into derivatives to offset the economic effect of other derivatives that are no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations. Neither type of offsettingOffsetting derivatives receivesdo not receive hedge accounting treatment and both are separately marked to market through earnings. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not significantly affect the operating results of the Bank.

The notional principal of the interest rate exchange agreements associated with derivatives with members or offsetting derivatives with other counterparties was $14 and $89, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The notional amount of an interest rate exchange agreement serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. However, the notional amount of derivatives represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the Bank to credit risk and market risk. The risks of derivatives can
130

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis by taking into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged, and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.

For more information related to the Bank’s accounting policies for derivatives, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The following table summarizes the notional amount and fair value of derivative instruments, including the effect of netting adjustments and cash collateral as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and related accrued interest.

 20212020
 Notional
Amount of
Derivatives
Derivative
Assets
Derivative
Liabilities
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives
Derivative
Assets
Derivative
Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps$31,526 $223 $148 $35,060 $88 $128 
Total31,526 223 148 35,060 88 128 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps31,540 21 42,804 16 
Interest rate caps and floors550 — — 780 — — 
Mortgage delivery commitments— — — — — 
Total32,090 21 43,585 16 
Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments$63,616 225 169 $78,645 92 144 
Netting adjustments and cash collateral(1)
(217)(164)(89)(132)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities$$$$12 

(1)    Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral, including accrued interest, held or placed with the same clearing agents or counterparty. Cash collateral posted, including accrued interest, was $77 and $72 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Cash collateral received, including accrued interest, was $130 and $30 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The following tables present, by type of hedged item, the gains and losses on fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the Bank’s Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
2021
Interest Income/(Expense)
AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation Bonds
Total interest income/(expense) presented in the Statements of Income$193 $220 $(62)
Gain/(loss) on fair value hedging relationships
Derivatives(1)
$175 $309 $(87)
Hedged items(368)(374)152 
Net gain/(loss) on fair value hedging relationships(193)(65)65 
Net amortization of gain on discontinued fair value hedging relationships(22)(108)— 
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities recorded in net interest income$(215)$(173)$65 
165
131


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







2020
Interest Income/(Expense)
AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation Bonds
Total interest income/(expense) presented in the Statements of Income$565 $243 $(437)
Gain/(loss) on fair value hedging relationships
Derivatives(1)
$(687)$(866)$27 
Hedged items387 678 (4)
Net gain/(loss) on fair value hedging relationships(300)(188)23 
Net amortization of gain on discontinued fair value hedging relationships(5)(50)— 
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities recorded in net interest income$(305)$(238)$23 
2019
Interest Income/(Expense)
AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation Bonds
Total interest income/(expense) presented in the Statements of Income$1,674 $394 $(1,631)
Gain/(loss) on fair value hedging relationships
Derivatives(1)
$(225)$(377)$41 
Hedged items240 341 (57)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities recorded in net interest income$15 $(36)$(16)
 2017 2016
 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps$24,270
 $92
 $27
 $20,741
 $67
 $32
Total24,270
 92
 27
 20,741
 67
 32
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps73,760
 81
 57
 42,135
 67
 49
Interest rate caps and floors1,563
 1
 1
 2,180
 6
 
Mortgage delivery commitments16
 
 
 13
 
 
Total75,339
 82
 58
 44,328
 73
 49
Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments$99,609
 174
 85
 $65,069
 140
 81
Netting adjustments and cash collateral(1)
  (91) (84)   (74) (79)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities  $83
 $1
   $66
 $2
(1)Includes net interest settlements.

(1)
Amounts include the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral and related accrued interest, where the netting requirements have been met. Cash collateral posted and related accrued interest was $10 and $22 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash collateral received and related accrued interest was $18 and $16 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table presents the cumulative basis adjustments on hedged items designated as fair value hedges and the related amortized cost of the hedged items as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
20212020
AdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation BondsAdvancesAFS SecuritiesConsolidated Obligation Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged asset/(liability)(1)
$13,613 $8,559 $(13,557)$23,605 $11,557 $(3,645)
Fair value hedging basis adjustments:
Active hedging relationships included in amortized cost$(15)$(329)$139 $477 $43 $(13)
Discontinued hedging relationships included in amortized cost118 901 — 32 1,016 — 
Total amount of fair value hedging basis adjustments$103 $572 $139 $509 $1,059 $(13)
(1)Includes only the portion of amortized cost representing the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships.
The following table presents the components of net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities as presented in the Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019.
132
 2017
 2016
 2015
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:     
Interest rate swaps$(1) $(2) $(10)
Total net gain/(loss) related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness(1) (2) (10)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     
Economic hedges:     
Interest rate swaps8
 39
 13
Interest rate caps and floors(5) (1) (3)
Net settlements(40) (32) (18)
Mortgage delivery commitments24
 5
 2
Total net gain/(loss) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(13) 11
 (6)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities$(14) $9
 $(16)

The following tables present, by type of hedged item, the gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the Bank’s net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.




166


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







 202120202019
Derivatives not designated as hedging instrumentsGain/(Loss)Gain/(Loss)Gain/(Loss)
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps$108 $(73)$(79)
Interest rate caps and floors— — (2)
Net settlements(71)(83)(16)
Mortgage delivery commitments— 
Total net gain/(loss) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments37 (153)(93)
Price alignment amount(1)
— 
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives$37 $(152)$(92)
(1)This amount relates to derivatives for which variation margin on cleared derivatives is characterized as a daily settled contract.
Hedged Item Type
Gain/(Loss)
on Derivatives

 Gain /(Loss) on Hedged Item
 
Net Fair
Value Hedge
Ineffectiveness

 
Effect of
Derivatives on
Net Interest Income(1)

Year ended December 31, 2017:       
Advances$63
 $(66) $(3) $(27)
Consolidated obligation bonds(41) 43
 2
 27
Total$22
 $(23) $(1) $
Year ended December 31, 2016:       
Advances$63
 $(62) $1
 $(55)
Consolidated obligation bonds(135) 132
 (3) 180
Total$(72) $70
 $(2) $125
Year ended December 31, 2015:       
Advances$19
 $(20) $(1) $(106)
Consolidated obligation bonds(170) 161
 (9) 257
Total$(151) $141
 $(10) $151

(1)
The net interest on derivatives in fair value hedge relationships is presented in the interest income/expense line item of the respective hedged item.

Credit Risk – Risk. The Bank is subject to credit risk as a result offrom potential nonperformance by counterparties to the interest rate exchange agreements. All of the Bank’s agreements governing uncleared derivative transactions contain master netting provisions to help mitigate the credit risk exposure to each counterparty. The Bank manages counterparty credit risk through credit analyses and collateral requirements and by following the requirements of the Bank’s risk management policies, credit guidelines, and Finance Agency and other regulations. The Bank also requires credit support agreements on all uncleared derivatives.

For cleared derivatives, the clearinghouse is the Bank’s counterparty. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through a clearing agent to the clearinghouse exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event thatif the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives, however, mitigates the Bank’sa clearinghouse, or central counterparty, lowers overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterpartiesit employs standard valuation and initial and variation margin processes and is specifically designed to withstand remote but plausible counterparty default credit events. Variation margin is posted dailyor collected for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent.the portfolio, and initial margin is posted for changes in risk profile of the portfolio. The Bank has analyzed the enforceability of offsetting rights applicable to its cleared derivative transactions and determined that the exercise of those offsetting rights by a non-defaulting party under these transactions should be upheld under applicable bankruptcy law and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rules in the event of a clearinghouse or clearing agent insolvency and under applicable clearinghouse rules upon a non-insolvency-based event of default of the clearinghouse or clearing agent. Based on this analysis, the Bank presents a net derivative receivable or payable for all of its transactions through a particular clearing agent with a particular clearinghouse.

Based on the Bank’s credit analyses and the collateral requirements, the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on its derivative transactions.

The Bank’s agreements for uncleared derivative transactions contain provisions that link the Bank’s credit rating from Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings to various rights and obligations. Certain of these derivative agreements provide that, if the Bank’s long-term debt rating falls below a specified rating (ranging from A3/A- to Baa3/BBB-), the Bank’s counterparty would have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate all of its outstanding derivative transactions with the Bank; the Bank’s agreements with its clearing agents for cleared derivative transactions have similar provisions with respect to the debt rating of FHLBank System consolidated bonds. If this occurs, the Bank may choose to enter into replacement hedges, either by transferring the existing transactions to another counterparty or entering into new replacement transactions, based on prevailing market rates. The aggregate fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that were

167


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



in a net derivative liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest) at December 31, 2017,2021, was $6,$64, for which the Bank had posted cash collateral of $6$62 in the ordinary course of business.

The Bank may present derivative instruments, related cash collateral received or pledged, and associated accrued interest by clearing agent or by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met.

133

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The following table presentstables present separately the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities that have met the netting requirements, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

2021
Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements
Amount RecognizedGross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash CollateralTotal Derivative Assets and Total Derivative LiabilitiesNoncash Collateral Not Offset That
 Can Be Sold or Repledged
Net Amount
Derivative Assets
Uncleared$224 $(224)$— $— $— 
Cleared(252)260 
Total$$260 
Derivative Liabilities
Uncleared$161 $(156)$$— $
Cleared(8)— — — 
Total$$
2020
Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements
Amount RecognizedGross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash CollateralTotal Derivative Assets and Total Derivative LiabilitiesNoncash Collateral Not Offset That
 Can Be Sold or Repledged
Net Amount
Derivative Assets
Uncleared$85 $(85)$— $— $— 
Cleared(4)(379)382 
Total$$382 
Derivative Liabilities
Uncleared$124 $(114)$10 $— $10 
Cleared20 (18)— 
Total$12 $12 

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements   Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements  
 Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amounts of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amounts of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
            
Derivative Assets           
Uncleared$35
 $(33) $2
 $41
 $(37) $4
Cleared139
 (58) 81
 99
 (37) 62
Total    $83
     $66
Derivative Liabilities           
Uncleared$29
 $(28) $1
 $37
 $(35) $2
Cleared56
 (56) 
 44
 (44) 
Total    $1
     $2

Note 1915 — Fair Value

The following fair value amounts have been determined by the Bank using available market information and the Bank’s best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to the Bank at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique or valuation methodology. For example, because an active secondary market does not exist for a portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, in certain cases fair values cannot be precisely quantified or verified and may change as economic and market factors and evaluation of those factors change. The Bank continues to refine its valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent. While the Bank believes that its valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a materially different estimate of fair value as of the reporting date. U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price). Therefore, the fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in current market transactions, although they do reflect the Bank’s judgment as to how a market participant would estimate the fair values. The fair value summary table does not represent an
134

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




estimate of the overall market value of the Bank as a going concern, which would take into account future business opportunities and the net profitability of total assets and liabilities.

The following tables present the net carrying value or carrying value, as applicable, the estimated fair value, and the fair value hierarchy level of the Bank’s financial instruments at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020. The Bank records trading securities, AFS securities, derivative assets, derivative liabilities, certain advances, certain consolidated obligations, and certain other assets at fair value on a recurring basis, and on occasion certain mortgage loans held for portfolio and certain other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The Bank records all other financial assets and liabilities at amortized cost. Refer to the following tables for further details about the financial assets and liabilities held at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis.


2021
Carrying
Value(1)
Estimated Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral(2)
Assets
Cash and due from banks$55 $55 $55 $— $— $— 
Interest-bearing deposits1,125 1,125 1,125 — — — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell15,500 15,500 — 15,500 — — 
Federal funds sold5,348 5,348 — 5,348 — — 
Trading securities252 252 — 252 — — 
AFS securities10,332 10,332 — 8,724 1,608 — 
HTM securities3,211 3,235 — 3,015 220 — 
Advances17,027 17,072 — 17,072 — — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans980 981 — 981 — — 
Accrued interest receivable45 45 — 45 — — 
Derivative assets, net(2)
— 225 — (217)
Other assets(3)
25 25 25 — — — 
Liabilities
Deposits769 769 — 769 — — 
Consolidated obligations:
Bonds22,716 22,635 — 22,635 — — 
Discount notes23,987 23,986 — 23,986 — — 
Total consolidated obligations46,703 46,621 — 46,621 — — 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock— — — 
Accrued interest payable33 33 — 33 — — 
Derivative liabilities, net(2)
— 169 — (164)
168
135


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







2020
Carrying
Value(1)
Estimated Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral(2)
Assets
Cash and due from banks$174 $174 $174 $— $— $— 
Interest-bearing deposits1,078 1,078 1,078 — — — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell7,250 7,250 — 7,250 — — 
Federal funds sold1,880 1,880 — 1,880 — — 
Trading securities4,260 4,260 — 4,260 — — 
AFS securities15,679 15,679 — 13,644 2,035 — 
HTM securities5,081 5,115 — 4,827 288 — 
Advances30,976 31,166 — 31,166 — — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans1,935 1,941 — 1,941 — — 
Accrued interest receivable82 82 — 82 — — 
Derivative assets, net(2)
— 92 — (89)
Other assets(3)
22 22 22 — — — 
Liabilities
Deposits887 887 — 887 — — 
Consolidated obligations:
Bonds44,408 44,457 — 44,457 — — 
Discount notes16,213 16,214 — 16,214 — — 
Total consolidated obligations60,621 60,671 — 60,671 — — 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock— — — 
Accrued interest payable24 24 — 24 — — 
Derivative liabilities, net(2)
12 12 — 144 — (132)
(1)    For certain financial instruments, the amounts represent net carrying value, which includes an allowance for credit losses.
 December 31, 2017
  
Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Assets           
Cash and due from banks$31
 $31

$31

$
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 1,115
 1,115
 
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 11,750
 
 11,750
 
 
Federal funds sold11,028
 11,029
 
 11,029
 
 
Trading securities1,164
 1,164
 
 1,164
 
 
AFS securities3,833
 3,833
 
 
 3,833
 
HTM securities14,680
 14,704
 
 13,697
 1,007
 
Advances77,382
 77,437
 
 77,437
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans2,076
 2,075
 
 2,075
 
 
Accrued interest receivable119
 119
 
 119
 
 
Derivative assets, net(1)
83
 83
 
 174
 
 (91)
Other assets(2)
9
 9
 9
 
 
 
Liabilities           
Deposits281
 281
 
 281
 
 
Consolidated obligations:           
Bonds85,063
 84,938
 
 84,938
 
 
Discount notes30,440
 30,437
 
 30,437
 
 
Total consolidated obligations115,503
 115,375
 
 115,375
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock309
 309

309


 
 
Accrued interest payable116

116



116
 
 
Derivative liabilities, net(1)
1
 1
 
 85
 
 (84)
Other           
Standby letters of credit19
 19



19
 
 
(2)    Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents or counterparty.

(3)    Represents publicly traded mutual funds held in a grantor trust.

169


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 December 31, 2016
 
Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Assets           
Cash and due from banks$2
 $2
 $2
 $
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits590
 590
 590
 
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell15,500
 15,500
 
 15,500
 
 
Federal funds sold4,214
 4,214
 
 4,214
 
 
Trading securities2,066
 2,066
 
 2,066
 
 
AFS securities4,489
 4,489
 
 
 4,489
 
HTM securities14,127
 14,141
 
 12,788
 1,353
 
Advances49,845
 49,921
 
 49,921
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans826
 845
 
 845
 
 
Accrued interest receivable79
 79
 
 79
 
 
Derivative assets, net(1)
66
 66
 
 140
 
 (74)
Other assets(2)
11
 11
 11
 
 
 
Liabilities           
Deposits169
 169
 
 169
 
 
Consolidated obligations:           
Bonds50,224
 50,188
 
 50,188
 
 
Discount notes33,506
 33,505
 
 33,505
 
 
Total consolidated obligations83,730
 83,693
 
 83,693
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock457
 457
 457
 
 
 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks1,345
 1,345
 
 1,345
 
 
Accrued interest payable67
 67
 
 67
 
 
Derivative liabilities, net(1)
2
 2
 
 81
 
 (79)
Other           
Standby letters of credit24
 24
 
 24
 
 

(1)
Amounts include the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral and related accrued interest, where the netting requirements have been met.
(2)Represents publicly traded mutual funds held in a grantor trust.

Fair Value Hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the fair value methodologies and valuation techniques as well as the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. The inputs are evaluated and an overall level for the fair value measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of market observability of the fair value measurement for the asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). An entity must disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements are classified for all financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring or non-recurring basis.

The application of the fair value hierarchy to the Bank’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are carried at fair value either on a recurring or non-recurring basis is as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the reporting entity can access on the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must
136

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for

170


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Valuations are derived from techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, which include pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or similar techniques.
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following assets and liabilities, including those for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2017:2021:
Trading securities
AFS securities
Certain advances
Derivative assets and liabilities
Certain consolidated obligation bonds
Certain other assets

For instruments carried at fair value, the Bank reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in or out as of the beginning of the quarter in which the changes occur. For the periods presented, the Bank did not have any reclassifications for transfers in or out of level 3 of the fair value hierarchy levels.hierarchy.

Summary of Valuation Methodologies and Primary Inputs.

Cash The valuation methodologies and Due from BanksThe estimatedprimary inputs used to develop the measurement of fair value equals the carrying value.

Federal Funds Soldfor assets and Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell – The estimatedliabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis in the Statements of overnight Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell approximates the carrying value. The estimated fair value of term Federal funds sold and term securities purchased under agreements to resell has been determined by calculating the present value of expected cash flows for the instruments and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable. The discount rates used in these calculationsCondition are the replacement rates for comparable instruments with similar terms.listed below.
Interest-Bearing Deposits The fair value of deposits is generally equal to the carrying value of the deposits because the deposits are primarily overnight deposits or due on demand. The Bank determines the fair values of term deposits by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows from the deposits and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable. The discount rates used in these calculations are the cost of deposits with similar terms.

Investment Securities MBS – To value its MBS, the Bank obtains prices from multiple designated third-party pricing vendors when available. The pricing vendors use various proprietary models to price these securities. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources including, but not limited to: benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, prices on benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data. Since many securities do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use available information as applicable, such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing, to determine the prices for individual securities. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all security valuations, which facilitates resolution of price discrepancies identified by the Bank.

At least annually, the Bank conducts reviews of the multiple pricing vendors to update and confirm its understanding of the vendors’ pricing processes, methodologies, and control procedures.


171


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank’s valuation technique for estimating the fair values of its MBS first requires the establishment of a median vendor price for each security. If three3 prices are received, the middle price is the median price; if two2 prices are received, the average of the two prices is the median price; and if one1 price is received, it is the median price (and also the default fair value) subject to additional validation. All vendor prices that are within a specified tolerance threshold of the median price are included in the cluster of vendor prices that are averaged to establish a default fair value. All vendor prices that are outside the threshold (outliers) are subject to further analysis including, but not limited to, comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities and/or dealer estimates, or use of internal model prices, which are deemed to be reflective of all relevant facts and circumstances that a market participant would consider. Such analysis is also applied in those limited instances
137

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




where no third-party vendor price or only one third-party vendor price is available in order to arrive at an estimated fair value. If an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is determined to be a better estimate of fair value, then the outlier (or the other price, as appropriate) is used as the fair value rather than the default fair value. If, instead, the analysis confirms that an outlier is (or outliers are) not representative of fair value and the default fair value is the best estimate, then the default fair value is used as the fair value.

If all vendor prices received for a security are outside the tolerance threshold level of the median price, then there is no default fair value, and the fair value is determined by an evaluation of all outlier prices (or the other prices, as appropriate) as described above.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, multiple vendor prices were received for most of the Bank’s MBS, and the fair value estimates for most of those securities were determined in accordance with the Bank’s valuation technique based on these vendor prices. Based on the Bank’s reviews of the pricing methods employed by the third-party pricing vendors and the relative lack of dispersion among the vendor prices (or, in those instances in which there were outliers, the Bank’s additional analyses), the Bank believes that its fair value estimates are reasonable and that the fair value measurements are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy. Based on limited market liquidity for PLRMBS, the fair value measurements for these securities were classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Investment Securities FFCB Bonds and CalHFA Bonds Non-MBS The Bank estimatesTo determine the estimated fair values of these securitiesnon-MBS investments, the Bank uses a market approach using prices from third-party pricing vendors, generally consistent with the methodology described abovemethodologies for Investment Securities – MBS.MBS. The Bank believes that its methodologies result in fair values that are reasonable and similar in all material respects based on the nature of the financial instruments being measured.

Advances Recorded Under the Fair Value Option Because quoted prices are not available for advances, the fair values are measured using model-based valuation techniques (such as calculating the present value of future cash flows and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable).

The Bank’s primary inputs for measuring the fair value of advances recorded under the fair value option are market-based consolidated obligation yield curve (CO Curve) inputs obtained from the Office of Finance. The CO Curve is then adjusted to reflect the rates on replacement advances with similar terms and collateral. These spread adjustments are not market-observable and are evaluated for significance in the overall fair value measurement and the fair value hierarchy level of the advance. The Bank obtains market-observable inputs for complex advances.advances recorded under the fair value option. These inputs may include volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew). The discount rates used in these calculations are the replacement advance rates for advances with similar terms. Pursuant to the Finance Agency’s advances regulation, advances with an original term to maturity or repricing period greater than six months generally require a prepayment fee sufficient to make the Bank financially indifferent to the borrower’s decision to prepay the advances. The Bank determined that no adjustment is required to the fair value measurement of advances for prepayment fees. In addition, theThe Bank also did not adjust its fair value measurement of advances recorded under the fair value option for creditworthiness primarily because advances were fully collateralized.


Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio – The estimated fair value for seasoned mortgage loans represents modeled prices based on observable market prices for seasoned agency mortgage-backed passthrough securities adjusted for differences in coupon, average loan rate, credit, and cash flow remittance between the Bank’s mortgage loans and

172


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the referenced instruments, while the estimated fair value for newly originated mortgage loans represents modeled prices based on MPF commitment rates. Market prices are highly dependent on the underlying prepayment assumptions. Changes in the prepayment speeds often have a material effect on the fair value estimates. These underlying prepayment assumptions are susceptible to material changes in the near term because they are made at a specific point in time.

Loans to and from Other FHLBanks Because these are overnight transactions, the estimated fair value approximates the recorded carrying value.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable – The estimated fair value approximates the carrying value of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable.

Other Assets – The estimated fair value of grantor trust assets is based on quoted market prices.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities In general, derivative instruments transacted and held by the Bank for risk management activities are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. These derivatives are interest rate-related. For these derivatives, the Bank measures fair value using internally developed discounted cash flow models that use market-observable inputs, such as the overnight index swap (OIS) curverates and volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew), adjusted for counterparty credit risk, as necessary.

138

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The Bank is subject to credit risk because of the risk of potential nonperformance by its derivative counterparties. To mitigate this risk, the Bank executes uncleared derivative transactions only with highly rated derivative dealers and major banks (derivative dealer counterparties) that meet the Bank’s eligibility criteria. In addition, the Bank has entered into master netting agreements and bilateral credit support agreements with all active derivative dealer counterparties that provide for delivery of collateral at specified levels to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. Under these policies and agreements, the amount of unsecured credit exposure to an individual derivative dealer counterparty is either (i) limited to an absolute dollar credit exposure limit according to the counterparty’s long-term debt or deposit credit rating, as determined by rating agencies or (ii) set at zero (subject to a minimum transfer amount). The Bank clears its cleared derivative transactions only through clearing agents that meet the Bank’s eligibility requirements, and the Bank’s credit exposure to the clearinghouse is secured by variation margin received from the clearinghouse. All credit exposure from derivative transactions entered into by the Bank with member counterparties that are not derivative dealers must be fully secured by eligible collateral. The Bank evaluated the potential for the fair value of the instruments to be affected by counterparty credit risk and determined that no adjustments to the overall fair value measurements were required.

The fair values of the derivative assets and liabilities include accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral remitted to/received from counterparties. The estimated fair values of the accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. The fair values of derivatives that met the netting requirements are presented on a net basis. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset and, if negative, they are classified as a liability.

Deposits The fair value of deposits is generally equal to the carrying value of the deposits because the deposits are primarily overnight deposits or due on demand. The Bank determines the fair values of term deposits by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows from the deposits and reducing the amount for accrued interest payable. The discount rates used in these calculations are the cost of deposits with similar terms.

Consolidated Obligations Recorded Under the Fair Value Option Because quoted prices in active markets are not generally available for identical liabilities, the Bank measures fair values using internally developed models that use primarily market-observable inputs. The Bank’s primary input for measuring the fair value of consolidated obligation bonds is a market-based CO Curve obtained from the Office of Finance. The Office of Finance constructs the CO Curve using the Treasury

173


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



yield curve as a base curve, which is adjusted by indicative consolidated obligation spreads obtained from market-observable sources. These market indications are generally derived from pricing indications from dealers, historical pricing relationships, and market activity for similar liabilities, such as recent GSE issuances or secondary market activity. For consolidated obligation bonds with embedded options, the Bank also obtains market-observable inputs, such as volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew).

Adjustments may be necessary to reflect the Bank’s credit quality or the credit quality of the FHLBank System when valuing consolidated obligation bonds measured at fair value. The Bank monitors its own creditworthiness and the creditworthiness of the other FHLBanks and the FHLBank System to determine whether any adjustments are necessary for creditworthiness in its fair value measurement of consolidated obligation bonds. The credit ratings of the FHLBank System and any changes to the credit ratings are the basis for the Bank to determine whether the fair values of consolidated obligations recorded under the fair value option have been significantly affected during the reporting period by changes in the instrument-specific credit risk.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock The estimated fair value of capital stock subject to mandatory redemption is generally at par value as indicated by contemporaneous purchases, redemptions, and repurchases at par value. Fair value includes estimated dividends earned at the time of reclassification from capital to liabilities, until such amount is paid, and any subsequently declared capital stock dividend. The Bank’s capital stock can only be acquired by members at par value and redeemed or repurchased at par value, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank’s capital stock is not traded, and no market mechanism exists for the exchange of Bank capital stock outside the cooperative ownership structure.

Commitments – The estimated fair value of standby letters of credit is based on the present value of fees currently charged for similar agreements and is recorded in other liabilities. The estimated fair value of off-balance sheet fixed rate commitments to fund advances and commitments to issue consolidated obligations takes into account the difference between current and committed interest rates.

Subjectivity of Estimates Related to Fair Values of Financial Instruments. Estimates of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the methodologies described above are subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters, such as the amount and timing of future cash flows, prepayment speed assumptions, expected interest rate volatility, methods to determine possible distributions of future interest rates used to value options, and the selection of discount rates that appropriately reflect market and credit risks. Changes in these judgments often have a material effect on the fair value estimates.

139

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Fair Value Measurements. The following tables below present the fair value of assets and liabilities, which are recorded on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by level within the fair value hierarchy.



December 31, 2021
Fair Value Measurement Using:
Netting Adjustments
 and Cash Collateral(1)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:
Trading securities:
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$— $250 $— $— $250 
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae— — — 
Total trading securities— 252 — — 252 
AFS securities:
U.S. obligations – Treasury securities— 504 — — 504 
MBS:
GSEs – multifamily— 8,220 — — 8,220 
PLRMBS— — 1,608 — 1,608 
Subtotal MBS— 8,220 1,608 — 9,828 
Total AFS securities— 8,724 1,608 — 10,332 
Advances(2)
— 1,772 — — 1,772 
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related— 225 — (217)
Other assets25 — — — 25 
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$25 $10,973 $1,608 $(217)$12,389 
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$— $627 $— $— $627 
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related— 169 — (164)
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$— $796 $— $(164)$632 
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$— $— $23 $— $23 
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$— $— $23 $— $23 
174
140


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)







December 31, 2020
Fair Value Measurement Using:
Netting Adjustments
 and Cash Collateral(1)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:
Trading securities:
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$— $4,257 $— $— $4,257 
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae— — — 
Total trading securities— 4,260 — — 4,260 
AFS securities:
U.S. obligations – Treasury securities— 4,983 — — 4,983 
MBS:
GSEs – multifamily— 8,661 — — 8,661 
PLRMBS— — 2,035 — 2,035 
Subtotal MBS— 8,661 2,035 — 10,696 
Total AFS securities— 13,644 2,035 — 15,679 
Advances(2)
— 2,147 — — 2,147 
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related— 92 — (89)
Other assets22 — — — 22 
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$22 $20,143 $2,035 $(89)$22,111 
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$— $111 $— $— $111 
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related— 144 — (132)12 
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$— $255 $— $(132)$123 
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$— $— $18 $— $18 
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$— $— $18 $— $18 
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the Bank, with the same clearing agents or counterparty.
December 31, 2017         
 Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:         
Trading securities:         
GSEs – FFCB bonds$
 $1,158
 $
 $
 $1,158
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 6
 
 
 6
Total trading securities
 1,164
 
 
 1,164
AFS securities:         
PLRMBS
 
 3,833
 
 3,833
Total AFS securities
 
 3,833
 
 3,833
Advances(2)

 6,431
 
 
 6,431
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related
 174
 
 (91) 83
Other assets9
 
 
 
 9
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$9
 $7,769
 $3,833
 $(91) $11,520
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:         
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$
 $949
 $
 $
 $949
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related
 85
 
 (84) 1
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$
 $1,034
 $
 $(84) $950
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)
         
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$
 $
 $3
 $
 $3
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$
 $
 $3
 $
 $3
(2)Represents advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

(3)Represents consolidated obligation bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(4)The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
December 31, 2016         
 Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:         
Trading securities:         
GSEs – FFCB bonds$
 $2,058
 $
 $
 $2,058
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 8
 
 
 8
Total trading securities
 2,066
 
 ��
 2,066
AFS securities:         
PLRMBS
 
 4,489
 
 4,489
Total AFS securities
 
 4,489
 
 4,489
Advances(2)

 3,719
 
 
 3,719
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related
 140
 
 (74) 66
Other assets11
 
 
 
 11
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$11
 $5,925
 $4,489
 $(74) $10,351
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:         
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$
 $1,507
 $
 $
 $1,507
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related
 81
 
 (79) 2
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$
 $1,588
 $
 $(79) $1,509
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)
         
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$
 $
 $5
 $
 $5
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$
 $
 $5
 $
 $5

(1)Amounts represent the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral, where the netting requirements have been met.

175


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



(2)
Represents advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(3)
Represents consolidated obligation bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(4)
The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The following tables presenttable presents a reconciliation of the Bank’s AFS PLRMBS that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019.

141

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




2017
 2016
 2015
202120202019
Balance, beginning of the period$4,489
 $5,414
 $6,371
Balance, beginning of the period$2,035 $2,597 $3,157 
Total gain/(loss) realized and unrealized included in:     Total gain/(loss) realized and unrealized included in:
Interest income92
 102
 83
Interest income69 70 78 
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(16) (16) (15)
Unrealized gain/(loss) of other-than-temporarily impaired securities included in AOCI195
 103
 (29)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)6
 (10) (15)
(Provision for)/reversal of credit losses(Provision for)/reversal of credit losses(25)— 
Other income, netOther income, net— — (14)
Unrealized gain/(loss) included in AOCIUnrealized gain/(loss) included in AOCI18 (111)(16)
Settlements(933) (1,104) (996)Settlements(519)(499)(609)
Transfers of HTM securities to AFS securities
 
 15
Transfers of HTM securities to AFS securities
Balance, end of the period$3,833
 $4,489
 $5,414
Balance, end of the period$1,608 $2,035 $2,597 
Total amount of gain/(loss) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the period$75
 $84
 $68
Total amount of unrealized gain/(loss) for the period included in AOCI relating to assets held at the end of the periodTotal amount of unrealized gain/(loss) for the period included in AOCI relating to assets held at the end of the period$19 $(111)$(16)
Total amount of gain/(loss) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets held at the end of the periodTotal amount of gain/(loss) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets held at the end of the period$71 $45 $62 

Fair Value Option. The fair value option provides an entity with an irrevocable option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value. It requires an entity to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the entity has chosen to use fair value on the face of the Statements of Condition. Fair value is used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets, liabilities, and commitments, with the changes in fair value recognized in net income. Interest income and interest expense on advances and consolidated bonds carried at fair value are recognized solely on the contractual amount of interest due or unpaid. Any transaction fees or costs are immediately recognized in non-interest incomeother income/(loss) or non-interestother expense.

The Bank elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments as follows:
Adjustable rate advances with embedded options (excluding callcaps and put options)floors;
Callable fixed rate advancesadvances;
Putable fixed rate advancesadvances;
Putable fixed rate advances with embedded options
Fixed rate advances with partial prepayment symmetrysymmetry;
Callable or non-callable capped floaterfloating rate consolidated obligation bonds with embedded caps;
Convertible consolidated obligation bondsbonds;
Adjustable or fixed rate range accrual consolidated obligation bondsbonds;
Ratchet consolidated obligation bondsbonds;
Adjustable rate advances indexed to non-LIBORcertain indices such as the Prime Rate, U.S. Treasury bill, and Effective Federal funds effective rateFunds Rate;
Adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds indexed to non-LIBORcertain indices such aslike the Prime Rate and U.S. Treasury billbill;
Step-up callable bonds, which pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank'sBank’s option on the step-up dates according to the terms of the bond offerings; and
Step-down callable bonds, which pay interest at decreasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank'sBank’s option on the step-down dates


176


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the bond offerings.
The Bank has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments to assist in mitigating potential earnings volatility that can arise from economic hedging relationships in which the carrying value of the hedged item is not adjusted for changes in fair value. The potential earnings volatility associated with usingrecording fair value changes of only for the hedging derivative is the Bank’s primary reason for electing the fair value option for financial assets and liabilities that do not qualify for hedge accounting or that have not previously met or may be at risk for not meeting the hedge effectiveness requirements.

142

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The following tables summarizetable summarizes the activity related to financial assets and liabilities for which the Bank elected the fair value option during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015:2019:
2017 2016 2015202120202019
Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

AdvancesConsolidated
Obligation Bonds
AdvancesConsolidated
Obligation Bonds
AdvancesConsolidated
Obligation Bonds
Balance, beginning of the period$3,719
 $1,507
 $3,677
 $4,233
 $5,137
 $6,717
Balance, beginning of the period$2,147 $111 $4,370 $337 $5,133 $2,019 
New transactions elected for fair value option3,657
 1,185
 947
 685
 1,018
 2,585
New transactions elected for fair value option670 723 7,070 — 2,324 — 
Maturities and terminations(918) (1,745) (878) (3,420) (2,442) (5,083)Maturities and terminations(982)(200)(9,373)(225)(3,200)(1,688)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and net (gain)/loss on consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(31) 
 (27) 13
 (31) 19
Net gain/(loss) on advances and net (gain)/loss on consolidated obligation bonds from changes in fair value recognized in earningsNet gain/(loss) on advances and net (gain)/loss on consolidated obligation bonds from changes in fair value recognized in earnings(62)(8)85 — 116 15 
Change in accrued interest4
 2
 
 (4) (5) (5)Change in accrued interest(1)(5)(1)(3)(9)
Balance, end of the period$6,431
 $949
 $3,719
 $1,507
 $3,677
 $4,233
Balance, end of the period$1,772 $627 $2,147 $111 $4,370 $337 
For instruments for which the fair value option has been elected, the related contractual interest income and contractual interest expense are recorded as part of net interest income on the Statements of Income. The remaining changes in fair value for instruments for which the fair value option has been elected are recorded as net gains/ (losses) on financial instruments held under the fair value option in the Statements of Income. The change in fair value does not include changes in instrument-specific credit risk. For advances and consolidated obligations recorded under the fair value option, the Bank determined that no adjustmentsnone of the remaining changes in fair value were related to the fair values of these instruments for instrument-specific credit risk were necessary for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019. In determining that there has been no change in instrument-specific credit risk period to period, the Bank primarily considered the following factors:

The Bank is a federally chartered GSE, and as a result of this status, the consolidated obligations have historically received the same credit ratings as the government bond credit rating of the United States, even though they are not obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by the United States.
The Bank is jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all consolidated obligations of each of the FHLBanks.

The following table presents the difference between the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding and aggregate fair value of advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option at December 31, 20172021 and 2016:2020:

20212020
Principal BalanceFair ValueFair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance
Principal BalanceFair ValueFair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance
Advances(1)
$1,706 $1,772 $66 $2,017 $2,147 $130 
Consolidated obligation bonds633 627 (6)110 111 
(1)    At December 31, 2021 and 2020, none of these advances were 90 days or more past due or had been placed on nonaccrual status.
 2017 2016
 Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

 Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

Advances(1)
$6,447
 $6,431
 $(16) $3,709
 $3,719
 $10
Consolidated obligation bonds955
 949
 (6) 1,515
 1,507
 (8)

(1)
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, none of these advances were 90 days or more past due or had been placed on nonaccrual status.

Note 2016 — Commitments and Contingencies

As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The regulations provide a general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. The Bank has

177


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2017,2021, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is
143

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




probable that it will be asked to do so.

The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $1,034,260$652,862 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $989,311$746,772 at December 31, 2016.2020. The par value of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligations was $115,602$46,851 at December 31, 2017,2021, and $83,749$60,606 at December 31, 2016.

2020.
The joint and several liability regulation provides a general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay its participation in the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. In accordance with this regulation, the president of each FHLBank is required to provide a quarterly certification that, among other things, the FHLBank will remain capable of making full and timely payment of all its current obligations, including direct obligations.

In addition, the regulation requires that an FHLBank must provide written notice to the Finance Agency if at any time the FHLBank is unable to provide the quarterly certification; projects that it will be unable to fully meet all of its current obligations, including direct obligations, on a timely basis during the quarter; or negotiates or enters into an agreement with another FHLBank for financial assistance to meet its obligations. If an FHLBank gives any one of these notices (other than in a case of a temporary interruption in the FHLBank'sFHLBank’s debt servicing operations resulting from an external event such as a natural disaster or a power failure), it must promptly file a consolidated obligations payment plan for Finance Agency approval specifying the measures the FHLBank will undertake to make full and timely payments of all its current obligations.

Notwithstanding any other provisions in the regulation, the regulation provides that the Finance Agency in its discretion may at any time order any FHLBank to make any principal or interest payment due on any consolidated obligation. To the extent an FHLBank makes any payment on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement from the FHLBank that is the primary obligor, which will have a corresponding obligation to reimburse the FHLBank for the payment and associated costs, including interest.

The regulation also provides that the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liability of an FHLBank for consolidated obligations among the other FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank'sFHLBank’s participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding or in any other manner it may determine to ensure that the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner.

Off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, were as follows:
20212020
Expire Within
One Year
Expire After
One Year
TotalExpire Within
One Year
Expire After
One Year
Total
Standby letters of credit outstanding$11,842 $4,848 $16,690 $14,838 $4,551 $19,389 
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans— — — — 
 2017 2016
 
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
 
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
Standby letters of credit outstanding$12,910
 $3,240
 $16,150
 $11,094
 $4,066
 $15,160
Commitments to fund additional advances1
 
 1
 5
 1
 6
Commitments to issue consolidated obligation discount notes, par134
 
 134
 846
 
 846
Commitments to issue consolidated obligation bonds, par595
 
 595
 655
 
 655
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans16
 
 16
 13
 
 13

Standby letters of credit are generally issued for a fee on behalf of members to support their obligations to third parties. If the Bank is required to make a payment for a beneficiary’s drawing under a letter of credit, the amount is immediately due and payable by the member to the Bank and is charged to the member’s demand deposit account with the Bank. TheAt December 31, 2021, the original terms of these standby letters of credit range from 143 days to 15 years,, including a final expiration in 2032.2036. The Bank monitors the creditworthiness of members that have standby letters of credit. The

178


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



value of the Bank’s obligations related to standby letters of credit is recorded in other liabilities and amounted to $19$34 and $36 at December 31, 2017,2021 and $24 at December 31, 2016.2020, respectively. Standby letters of credit are fully collateralized at the time of issuance. Based on the Bank’s credit analyses of members’ financial condition and collateral requirements, the Bank deemed it unnecessary to record any additional liability for credit losses on the letters of credit outstanding or other off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

CommitmentsThere were 0 commitments to fund advances totaled $1at December 31, 2017,2021 and $6 at December 31, 2016.2020. Advances funded under advance commitments are fully collateralized at the time of funding (see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses). Based on the Bank’s credit analysesfunding.
144

Federal Home Loan Bank deemed it unnecessaryof San Francisco
Notes to record any additional liability on the advance commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.Financial Statements (continued)





The Bank may enterhad previously entered into commitments that unconditionally obligateobligated it to purchase mortgage loans from its members. Commitments are generally for periods not exceeding 60 days. Delivery commitments are recorded at fair value as derivative assets or derivative liabilities in the Statements of Condition.

The Bank executes over-the-counterhas pledged securities as collateral related to its cleared and uncleared interest rate exchange agreements with major banks and derivative entities affiliated with broker-dealers and has executed uncleared interest rate exchange agreements in the past with the Bank’s members. The Bank enters into master agreements with netting provisions and into bilateral credit support agreements with all active derivative dealer counterparties. All member counterparty master agreements, excluding those with derivative dealers, are subject to the terms of the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement with members, and all member counterparties (except for those that are derivative dealers) must fully collateralize the Bank’s net credit exposure. For cleared derivatives, the clearinghouse is the Bank’s counterparty, and the Bank has clearing agreements with clearing agents that provide for delivery of initial margin to, and exchange of variation margin with, the clearinghouse.derivatives. See Note 1814 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information about the Bank’s pledged collateral and other credit-risk-relatedcredit risk-related contingent features.

The Bank charged operating expenses for net rental and related costs As of approximately $7, $6, and $5 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, the Bank had pledged total collateral of $329, including securities with a carrying value of $252, all of which may be repledged, and 2015, respectively. Future minimum rentals at cash collateral, including accrued interest, of $77 to counterparties and the clearinghouse that had market risk exposure to the Bank related to derivatives. As of December 31, 2017, were as follows:

YearEquipment Capital Leases
 Premises Operating Leases
2018$2
 $5
20192
 4
20202
 2
20212
 
20221
 
Total$9
 $11

Lease agreements for2020, the Bank premises generally provide for increases inhad pledged total collateral of $451, including securities with a carrying value of $379, all of which may be repledged, and cash collateral, including accrued interest, of $72 to counterparties and the basic rentals resulting from increases in property taxes and maintenance expenses. Such increases are not expectedclearinghouse that had market risk exposure to have a material effect on the Bank's financial condition or results of operations.

Bank related to derivatives.
The Bank may be subject to various pending legal proceedings that may arise in the ordinary course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, the Bank does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Other commitments and contingencies are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 85 – Advances, Note 96 – Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio, Note 128 – Consolidated Obligations, Note 139

179


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Affordable Housing Program, Note 1511 – Capital, Note 1612 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans, and Note 1814 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

Note 2117 — Transactions with Certain Members, Certain Nonmembers, and Other FHLBanks

Transactions with Members and Nonmembers.The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure under which current member institutions, certain former members, and certain other nonmembers own the capital stock of the Bank. Former members and nonmembers that have outstanding transactions with the Bank are required to maintain their investment in the Bank'sBank’s capital stock until their outstanding transactions mature or are paid off or until their capital stock is redeemed following the five-year redemption period for capital stock or is repurchased by the Bank, in accordance with the Bank'sBank’s capital requirements. (For further information on concentration risk, see Note 1511 – Capital and Note 85Advances).Advances.)

Under the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations, each member eligible to vote is entitled to cast by ballot one vote for each share of stock that it was required to hold as of the record date, which is December 31, of the year prior to each election, subject to the limitation that no member may cast more votes than the average number of shares of the Bank’s stock that are required to be held by all members located in such member's state. All transactions with members, nonmembers, and their affiliates are entered into in the ordinary course of business. As of and for the three-year period ending ended December 31, 2017,2021, no shareholder owned 10% or more of the total voting interests in the Bank because of this statutory limit on members' voting rights.

All advances are made to members, and all mortgage loans held for portfolio were purchased from members. The Bank also maintains deposit accounts for members, certain former members, and certain other nonmembers primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to advances and mortgage loan purchases. All transactions with members and their affiliates are entered into in the ordinary course of business.

The Bank may invest in Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits, commercial paper, and MBS and executes derivative transactions with members or their affiliates. The Bank purchases MBS through securities brokers or dealers and executes all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. When the Bank executes non-MBS investments with a member, the Bank may give consideration to the member’s secured credit and the Bank'sBank’s advances pricing. pricing
145

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




As an additional service to its members, the Bank has in the past entered into offsetting interest rate exchange agreements, acting as an intermediary between exactly offsetting derivative transactions with members and other counterparties. These transactions were executed at market rates.

The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to establish an AHP. TheThrough the AHP, the Bank provides subsidies to members, whichwho use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Only Bank members, along with their nonmember AHP project sponsors, may submit AHP applications. All AHP subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

The FHLBank Act also requires the Bank to establish a Community Investment Program (CIP) and authorizes the Bank to offer additional Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) programs. Under these programs, the Bank provides subsidies in the form of grants and below-market interest rate advances to members or standby letters of credit forto members for community lending and economic development projects. Only Bank members may submit applications for CICA subsidies. All CICA subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

In instances where the member has an officer or director serving on the Bank’s Boardboard of Directors,directors, all of the aforementioned transactions with the member are subject to the same eligibility and credit criteria, as well as the same conditions, as comparable transactions with all other members, in accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks. The following tables set forth information at the dates and for the periods indicated with respect to transactions with members that have an officer or director serving on the Bank’s Boardboard of Directors.directors.

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Assets:
Advances$3,107 $2,650 
Accrued interest receivable
Liabilities:
Deposits$34 $27 
Capital:
Capital Stock$117 $103 
180
For the Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Interest Income – Advances$51 $75 $87 


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



  
December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
Assets:   
Advances$3,072
 $3,756
Mortgage loans held for portfolio13
 17
Accrued interest receivable5
 4
Liabilities:   
Deposits$3
 $3
Capital:   
Capital Stock$126
 $129

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017
 2016
 2015
Interest Income:     
Advances$41
 $35
 $35
Mortgage loans held for portfolio1
 1
 1

Transactions with Other FHLBanks. The Bank may occasionally enter into transactions with other FHLBanks. These transactions are summarized below.

Deposits with other FHLBanks. The Bank may, from time to time, maintain deposits with other FHLBanks. Deposits with other FHLBanks totaled a de minimis amountsamount and $1 at December 31, 20172021 and 2016, which2020, respectively, and were recorded as “Interest-bearing deposits” in the Statements of Condition in the Cash and due from banks line item.Condition.

Overnight Funds. The Bank may borrow or lend unsecured overnight funds from or to other FHLBanks. All such transactions are at current market rates. Interest income and interest expense related to these transactions with other FHLBanks are included in other interest income and interest expense from other borrowings in the Statements of Income. Balances outstanding at period end with other FHLBanks, if any, are identified in the Bank’s financial statements. During 2021, the Bank extended 0 overnight loans to other FHLBanks. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015,2019, the Bank extended overnight loans to other FHLBanks for $1,505, $505,$925 and $1,805$1,450, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019 the Bank borrowed $240, $2,490,$140, $895, and $4,812$2,245, respectively, from other
146

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




FHLBanks. The impact to net interest income related to these transactions was de minimis in any periodfor all periods in this report.

MPF Mortgage Loans. The Bank pays a transaction servicesmembership fee to the FHLBank of Chicago for its participation in the MPF program. ThisProgram and a transaction services fee that is assessed monthly and is based on the amount of mortgage loans in which the Bank invested and which remain outstanding on its Statements of Condition. For the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016,2019, the Bank recorded $1, $2, and $1,$3, respectively, in MPF membership fee expense and transaction services fee expense to the FHLBank of Chicago, which waswere recorded in the Statements of Income as other expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank recorded de minimis amounts in MPF transaction services fee expense to the FHLBank of Chicago.

In addition, the Bank receives a counterparty fee from the FHLBank of Chicago for facilitating the sale of loans under the MPF program. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank recorded a de minimis amount in MPF counterparty fee income from the FHLBank of Chicago, which was recorded in the Statements of Income as other income. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank had no MPF counterparty fee income from the FHLBank of Chicago.

Consolidated Obligations. The Bank may, from time to time, transfer to or assume from another FHLBank the outstanding primary liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank did not transfer any debt to other FHLBanks or assume any debt from other FHLBanks.


181


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Transactions with the Office of Finance. The Bank’s proportionate share of the cost of operating the Office of Finance is identified in the Statements of Income.


Note 2218 — Other


The table below discloses the categories included in other operating expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015.2019.

202120202019
Professional and contract services$28 $36 $38 
Travel— — 
Occupancy11 11 15 
Equipment
Other10 
Total$54 $60 $73 

 2017
 2016
 2015
Professional and contract services$39
 $47
 $50
Travel2
 2
 2
Occupancy7
 6
 5
Equipment16
 13
 10
Other6
 6
 4
Total$70
 $74
 $71

Note 2319 — Subsequent Events

One of the Bank’s PLRMBS investments is held within a trust that has been the subject of litigation by the trustee since 2012. Upon final resolution of the litigation, to which the Bank was not a party, the trustee was required to transmit settlement proceeds to the trust. As a result of the distribution of the settlement proceeds in January 2022 to the beneficial owners of the securities in the trust, including the Bank, the Bank recorded settlement proceeds of $28 as income and also recognized a reduction of the principal balance of the PLRMBS of $53 in January 2022. Additionally, upon resolution of the trustee litigation and distribution of the Bank’s share of the settlement proceeds, a triggering event occurred causing the Bank to pay one of the defendants in a settled PLRMBS litigation a previously recorded liability of $41 in the first quarter of 2022.
There were no other material subsequent events identified, subsequent to December 31, 2017,2021, until the time of the Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

147


182



Supplementary Financial Data (Unaudited)

Supplementary financial data for each full quarter in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, are included in the following tables (dollars in millions except per share amounts).

 Three Months Ended
 December 31, 2017
 September 30, 2017
 
June 30,
 2017

 
March 31,
2017

Interest income$485
 $434
 $366
 $315
Interest expense342
 288
 222
 181
Net interest income143
 146
 144
 134
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 
 
 
Other income/(loss)(14) (4) (16) 112
Other expense54
 51
 39
 80
Assessments8
 10
 9
 18
Net income/(loss)$67
 $81
 $80
 $148
Dividends declared per share$1.76
 $1.75
 $1.73
 $2.28
Annualized dividend rate7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 9.08%



 Three Months Ended
 December 31, 2016
 September 30, 2016
 
June 30,
 2016

 
March 31,
2016

Interest income$283
 $274
 $265
 $256
Interest expense175
 151
 148
 133
Net interest income108
 123
 117
 123
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 
 
 
Other income/(loss)82
 241
 (9) 171
Other expense46
 39
 37
 36
Assessments17
 34
 8
 27
Net income/(loss)$127
 $291
 $63
 $231
Dividends declared per share(1)
$5.66
 $2.28
 $2.21
 $2.01
Annualized dividend rate(1)
22.51% 9.17% 8.90% 7.99%

(1)In the fourth quarter of 2016, the amount of dividends declared per share includes a special dividend of $3.41 at an annualized dividend rate of 13.57%.


183



Investments

Supplementary financial data on the carrying values of the Bank’s investments as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, are included in the tables below.

(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
Trading securities:     
U.S. government corporations and GSEs – FFCB bonds$1,158
 $2,058
 $1,424
MBS:
    
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae6
 8
 9
Total trading securities1,164
 2,066
 1,433
AFS securities:

    
MBS:
    
PLRMBS3,833
 4,489
 5,414
Total AFS securities3,833
 4,489
 5,414
HTM securities:
    
Certificates of deposits500
 1,350
 
States and political subdivisions:
    
Housing finance agency bonds – CalHFA bonds187
 225
 275
U.S. government corporations and GSEs:
    
MBS:
    
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae751
 951
 1,227
GSEs:
    
Freddie Mac6,690
 4,349
 3,677
Fannie Mae5,731
 6,095
 4,136
PLRMBS821
 1,157
 1,487
Total HTM securities14,680
 14,127
 10,802
Total securities19,677
 20,682
 17,649
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 15,500
 10,000
Federal funds sold11,028
 4,214
 4,626
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 590
 
Total investments$43,570
 $40,986
 $32,275
















184



As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank’s investments had the following maturity (based on contractual final principal payment) and yield characteristics.
(Dollars in millions)Within One YearAfter One Year But
Within Five Years
After Five Years But
Within Ten Years
After Ten YearsCarrying Value
AFS securities:
U.S. obligations – Treasury notes$504 $— $— $— $504 
MBS:
GSEs multifamily:
Freddie Mac— — 652 159 811 
Fannie Mae— — 6,750 659 7,409 
Subtotal GSEs multifamily— — 7,402 818 8,220 
PLRMBS— — 1,608 1,608 
Total AFS securities$504 $— $7,402 $2,426 $10,332 
Yield on AFS securities(1)
1.87 %— %3.23 %6.2 %3.83 %
HTM securities:
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations – single-family – Ginnie Mae$— $— $— $113 $113 
GSEs single-family:
Freddie Mac— — 206 207 
Fannie Mae— — 12 792 804 
Subtotal GSEs single-family— — 13 998 1,011 
GSEs multifamily:
Freddie Mac— 481 696 — 1,177 
Fannie Mae— 219 474 — 693 
Subtotal GSEs multifamily— 700 1,170 — 1,870 
PLRMBS— 14 202 217 
Total HTM securities$— $701 $1,197 $1,313 $3,211 
Yield on HTM securities(1)
— %0.49 %0.53 %1.7 %1.00 %
(Dollars in millions)Within One Year
 
After One Year But
Within Five Years

 
After Five Years But
Within Ten Years

 After Ten Years
 Carrying Value
Trading securities:         
U.S. government corporations and GSEs – FFCB bonds$500
 $658
 $
 $
 $1,158
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 1
 5
 
 6
Total trading securities500
 659

5



1,164
Yield on trading securities1.45% 1.61% 2.52% % 1.55%
AFS securities:         
MBS:         
PLRMBS
 
 
 3,833
 3,833
Total AFS securities
 
 
 3,833
 3,833
Yield on AFS securities% % % 6.54% 6.54%
HTM securities:         
Certificates of deposits500
 
 
 
 500
States and political subdivisions:         
Housing finance agency bonds – CalHFA bonds
 
 12
 175
 187
U.S. government corporations and GSEs:         
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – single-family – Ginnie Mae
 
 
 751
 751
GSEs single-family:         
Freddie Mac
 1
 3
 2,035
 2,039
Fannie Mae
 2
 6
 3,592
 3,600
Subtotal GSEs single-family
 3
 9
 5,627
 5,639
GSEs multifamily:         
Freddie Mac
 
 4,651
 
 4,651
Fannie Mae
 
 2,131
 
 2,131
Subtotal GSEs multifamily
 
 6,782
 
 6,782
PLRMBS
 
 10
 811
 821
Total HTM securities500

3

6,813

7,364
 14,680
Yield on HTM securities1.49% 5.79% 1.79% 2.52% 2.15%
Total securities1,000

662

6,818

11,197

19,677
Yield on total securities1.47% 1.63% 1.79% 3.81% 2.90%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 
 
 
 11,750
Federal funds sold11,028
 
 
 
 11,028
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 
 
 
 1,115
Total investments$24,893

$662

$6,818

$11,197

$43,570



(1)    The weighted average yields on AFS and HTM securities are calculated as the sum of each debt security using the period end balances multiplied by the coupon rate adjusted by the impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, divided by the total debt securities in the applicable HTM or AFS portfolio. The result is then multiplied by 100 to express it as a percentage.
185
148



Deposits
Mortgage Loan Data

All Bank deposits are uninsured. The unpaid principalaverage balances of delinquent mortgage loans forinterest-bearing demand and overnight deposits were $925, $799, and $314, and the past five yearsweighted average interest rates paid on demand and overnight deposits were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
30 - 59 days delinquent$8
 $7
 $10
 $12
 $14
60 - 89 days delinquent2
 3
 5
 5
 7
90 days or more delinquent12
 15
 18
 22
 27
Total past due22
 25
 33
 39
 48
Total current loans1,983
 789
 620
 674
 865
Total mortgage loans$2,005
 $814
 $653
 $713
 $913
In process of foreclosure, included above(1)
$3
 $5
 $7
 $11
 $15
Nonaccrual loans$12
 $15
 $18
 $22
 $27
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
 $
 $
 $
Delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding1.11% 3.12% 5.05% 5.47% 5.26%
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(2)
0.61% 1.83% 2.79% 3.13% 3.00%

(1)
Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(2)Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance of total mortgage loans outstanding.

The allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio was as follows:

(Dollars in millions)2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Balance, beginning of the period$
 $
 $1
 $2
 $3
(Charge-offs)/recoveries
 
 (2) (1) 
Provision for/(recovery of) credit losses
 
 1
 
 (1)
Balance, end of the period$
 $
 $
 $1
 $2
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period% (0.03)% (0.24)% (0.05)% (0.07)%

For the past five years, the interest on nonaccrual loans that was contractually due0.01%, 0.16%, and recognized in income was as follows:

Interest on Nonaccrual Loans
          
(In millions)2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Interest contractually due on nonaccrual loans during the period$1
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $1
Interest recognized in income for nonaccrual loans during the period
 
 
 
 
Shortfall$1
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $1

186



Geographic Concentration of Mortgage Loans(1)

 December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
California86.39% 66.07%
Arizona1.52
 2.80
New York1.33
 4.19
Illinois1.16
 3.68
Texas1.07
 1.18
All others(2)
8.53
 22.08
Total100.00% 100.00%

(1)Percentages calculated based on the unpaid principal balance at the end of each period.
(2)None of the remaining states represented more than 0.78% and 2.34% of the portfolio at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Short-Term Borrowings
Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. The following is a summary of short-term borrowings for1.85% during the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2019. The average balances of term deposits were $25, $14, and $1, and the weighted average interest rates paid on term deposits were 0.01%, 20160.02%, and 2015:1.85% during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.

Term deposits totaling $18 and $16 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, mature in three months or less.
Selected Financial Data and Financial Ratios
The following selected financial data of the Bank should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.
202120202019
Selected Other Data for the Year
Net Interest Margin(1)
0.91 %0.54 %0.50 %
Return on Average Assets0.49 0.36 0.31 
Return on Average Equity4.46 5.32 4.92 
Annualized Dividend Rate5.74 5.53 7.00 
Dividend Payout Ratio(2)
46.95 47.39 63.19 
Average Equity to Average Assets Ratio11.00 6.69 6.21 
Selected Other Data at Yearend
Regulatory Capital Ratio(3)
10.89 8.69 6.18 
Duration Gap (in months)— 
(1)    Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(2)    This ratio is calculated as dividends per share divided by net income per share.
(3)    This ratio is calculated as regulatory capital divided by total assets. Regulatory capital includes retained earnings, Class B capital stock, and mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability), but excludes AOCI.
 Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes 
Consolidated Obligation Bonds With Original
Maturities of One Year or Less
(Dollars in millions)2017
 2016
 2015
 2017
 2016
 2015
Outstanding at end of the period$30,440
 $33,506
 $27,647
 $46,047
 $19,190
 $18,273
Weighted average rate at end of the period1.24% 0.46% 0.25% 1.23% 0.67% 0.25%
Daily average outstanding for the period$33,657
 $33,504
 $28,853
 $25,927
 $18,536
 $11,085
Weighted average rate for the period0.85% 0.41% 0.16% 0.94% 0.53% 0.17%
Highest outstanding at any monthend$38,632
 $42,244
 $33,859
 $46,047
 $22,913
 $18,273

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.


ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The senior management of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports that it files or submits under the 1934 Act is accumulated and communicated to the Bank’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Bank’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Bank’s management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of controls and procedures.


187149



Management of the Bank has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures with the participation of the president and chief executive officer and seniorexecutive vice president and chief financial officer as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Bank’s president and chief executive officer and seniorexecutive vice president and chief financial officer have concluded that the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the 1934 Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Bank'sBank’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directors,directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Bank;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Bank are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Bank; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

During the three months ended December 31, 2017,2021, there were no changes in the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting. For management’s assessment of the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting, refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

Consolidated Obligations

The Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures for accumulating and communicating information in compliance with the Bank’s disclosure and financial reporting requirements relating to the joint and several liability for the consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). Because the FHLBanks are independently managed and operated, the Bank’s management relies on information that is provided or disseminated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), the Office of Finance, and the other FHLBanks, as well as on published FHLBank credit ratings, in determining whether the joint and several liability regulation is reasonably likely to result in a direct obligation for the Bank or whether it is reasonably possible that the Bank will accrue a direct liability.

The Bank’s management also relies on the operation of the joint and several liability regulation. The joint and several liability regulation requires that each FHLBank file with the Finance Agency a quarterly certification that it will remain capable of making full and timely payment of all of its current obligations, including direct obligations, coming due during the next quarter. In addition, if an FHLBank cannot make such a certification or if it projects that it may be unable to meet its current obligations during the next quarter on a timely basis, it must file a notice with the Finance Agency. Under the joint and several liability regulation, the Finance Agency may order any FHLBank to make principal and interest payments on any consolidated obligations of any other FHLBank, or allocate the outstanding liability of an FHLBank among all remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank’s participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding or on any other basis.



188
150



ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Bank. Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (the Loan Rule) prohibits an accounting firm, such as PwC, from having certain financial relationships with its audit clients and affiliated entities. Specifically, the Loan Rule, in relevant part, provides that an accounting firm generally would not be independent if it or a covered person in the firm received a loan from a lender that is a “record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the audit client’s equity securities.” A covered person in the firm includes personnel on the audit engagement team, personnel in the chain of command, partners and managers who provide ten or more hours of non-audit services to the audit client, and partners in the office where the lead engagement partner practices in connection with the client.Litigation Proceeds
PwC has advised the Bank that PwC covered persons had lending relationships with two Bank shareholders (referred to below as the “Lenders”) that owned more than ten percentOne of the Bank’s capital stock during 2017. Underprivate-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) investments is held within a trust that has been the Loan Rule, these lending relationships could call into question PwC’s independence with respectsubject of litigation by the trustee since 2012. Upon final resolution of the litigation, to which the Bank was not a party, the trustee was required to transmit settlement proceeds to the Bank. The Bank is providing this disclosure to explaintrust. As a result of the facts and circumstances, as well as PwC’s anddistribution of the Audit Committee’s conclusions, concerning PwC’s objectivity and impartiality with respectsettlement proceeds in January 2022 to the auditbeneficial owners of the Bank.
PwC advisedsecurities in the Audit Committeetrust, including the Bank, the Bank recorded settlement proceeds of $28 million as income and also recognized a reduction of the Bank that it believes that based on its analysis, PwC remains objective and impartial despite matters that may ultimately be determined to be inconsistent with the criteria set out in the rules and regulationsprincipal balance of the SEC related to the Loan Rule, and therefore believes that it can continue to serve as the Bank’s independent registered public accounting firm. PwC also advised the Audit Committee that it believes thatPLRMBS of $53 million in light of its analysis, a reasonable investor possessing all the facts regarding the lending relationships described above and PwC audit relationships would conclude that PwC is able to exhibit the requisite objectivity and impartiality to report on the financial statementsJanuary 2022. Additionally, upon resolution of the Bank as the independent registered public accounting firm. PwC has advised the Audit Committee that their viewstrustee litigation and conclusions are based in part on the following considerations:
the features of the holdings of the more than 10% shareholders, such as limited voting rights, demonstrate that their ownership of Bank capital stock does not call into question PwC’s objectivity and impartiality;
the covered persons do not play an active role in the conduct of the audit;
PwC professionals are required to disclose any relationships that may raise issues about objectivity, confidentiality, independence, conflicts of interest, or favoritism; and
the lead audit partner has no reason to believe that the Lenders have made any attempt to influence the conductdistribution of the Bank’s audit or the objectivity and impartiality of any member of Pw C’s audit engagement team.
In addition, PwC identified no aspectsshare of the lending relationships involvingsettlement proceeds, a triggering event occurred causing the covered persons thatBank to pay one of the defendants in a settled PLRMBS litigation a previously recorded liability of $41 million in the first quarter of 2022.
Executive Incentive Plan for 2022
On February 11, 2022, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) informed the Bank of its non-objection to the board of directors-approved 2022 performance goals, qualifiers, and award scales under the Bank's Executive Incentive Plan (EIP). The EIP is an incentive plan established by the board of directors for senior executive officers (excluding the chief audit executive) under which participants are eligible to receive an annual total incentive award (Annual Award) for the achievement of performance goals for designated performance periods.
Under the EIP, any Annual Award for the 2022 performance period would impact PwC’s objectivityvest in two parts: 50% of the Annual Award (Year-End Award) would vest on the last day of 2022 subject to, among other things, the achievement of the 2022 performance goals and impartiality.2022 qualifiers and the participant receiving a satisfactory performance rating for the 2022 performance period; and the remaining 50% of the Annual Award would vest at the end of a 3-year deferral period (Deferred Award) subject to, among other things, the satisfaction of the 2022 qualifiers and the participant receiving a satisfactory performance rating for the 3-year deferral period.

Performance goals and qualifiers are the factors established annually by the board of directors for each performance period and taken into consideration in determining the amount of an Annual Award. Under the EIP, the 2022 performance period goals for the Year-End Award and Deferred Award are as follows: Business and Financial; Risk Management; Community Investment; and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and People.
The Bank’s Audit Committee evaluated2022 qualifiers under the EIP are: (i) no submission of material information providedto a regulatory or a reporting agency is significantly past due; (ii) the Bank makes sufficient progress, as determined by PwC regarding the Loan RuleBoard, in the timely remediation of significant examination, monitoring, and other supervisory findings; (iii) no material risk management deficiency exists at the Bank; (iv) no operational errors or omissions result in light of thismaterial revisions to the financial results, information assessed PwC’ssubmitted to the Finance Agency, or data used to determine incentive payouts; and (v) the Bank has sufficient capital to pay dividends and the ability to perform an objectiverepurchase member stock.
For 2022, the achievement levels are: Minimum (the minimum level of performance that must be achieved for any awards to be paid); Meets (performance that is expected under the Bank’s EIP); and impartial audit, including considerationMaximum (a most optimistic level of performance that substantially exceeds expected performance). If the ownership structure of the Bank, the limited voting rightstotal weighted achievement level of the Bank’s members,performance goals and individual goals is between Minimum and Maximum, the compositionrange of Annual Awards for the Bank’s Boardparticipants (other than the chief executive officer) as a percentage of Director’s. In additionbase salary would be 40% to 85%, and for the considerations listed above, the Audit Committee considered the following:chief executive officer, 50% to 100%.
as of December 31, 2017, and as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, no officer or director of the Lenders served on the Bank’s Board of Directors;
only one of the Lenders will be eligible to vote in 2018, and only in the at-large independent directorship election; and
the Lenders are subject to the same terms and conditions for conducting business with the Bank as any other borrower.ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within PwC’s audit engagement has not been impaired.


Not applicable.
189
151



PART III.III


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (Board) of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is composed of member directors and nonmember independent directors. Each year the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) designates the total number of director positions for the Bank for the following year. Member director positions are allocated to each of the three states in the Bank'sBank’s district. The allocation is based on the number of shares of capital stock required to be held by the members in each of the three states as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year (the record date), with at least one member director position allocated to each state and at least three member director positions allocated to California. Of the eight member director positions designated by the Finance Agency for 20172021 and 2018,2022, one was allocated to Arizona, six were allocated to California, and one was allocated to Nevada. The nonmember independent director positions on the Board must be at least two-fifths of the number of member director positions and at least two of them must be public interest director positions. The Finance Agency designated seven nonmember independent director positions for 20172021 and 2018,2022, two of which were public interest director positions.

The Bank holds elections each year for the director positions with terms ending at yearend, with new terms beginning the following January 1. For member director positions, members located in the relevant states as of the record date are eligible to participate in the election for the state in which they are located. For nonmember independent director positions, all members located in the district as of the record date are eligible to participate in the election. For each director position to be filled, an eligible institution may cast one vote for each share of capital stock it was required to hold as of the record date (according to the requirements of the Bank'sBank’s capital plan), except that an eligible institution's votes for each director position to be filled may not exceed the average number of shares of capital stock required to be held by all of the members in that state as of the record date. In the case of an election to fill more than one member director position for a state, an eligible institution may not cumulate or divide its block of eligible votes. Interim vacancies in director positions are filled by the Board. The Board does not solicit proxies, nor are eligible institutions permitted to solicit or use proxies to cast their votes in an election.

Candidates for member director positions are not nominated by the Bank'sBank’s Board. As provided for in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), member director candidates are nominated by the institutions eligible to participate in the election in the relevant state. Candidates for nonmember independent director positions are nominated by the Board, following consultation with the Bank'sBank’s Affordable Housing Advisory Council, and are reviewed by the Finance Agency. The Bank'sBank’s Governance Committee performs certain functions that are similar to the functions of a nominating committee with respect to the nomination of nonmember independent directors. If only one individual is nominated by the Board for each open nonmember independent director position, that individual must receive at least 20% of the eligible votes to be declared elected; and if two or more individuals are nominated by the Board for any single open nonmember independent director position, the individual receiving the highest number of votes cast in the election must be declared elected by the Bank.

Each member director must be a citizen of the United States and must be an officer or director of a member of the Bank (located in the state to which the director position has been allocated) that meets all minimum capital requirements established by the member's appropriate Federal banking agency or appropriate state regulator. There are no other eligibility or qualification requirements in the FHLBank Act or the regulations governing the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) for member directors. Each nonmember independent director must be a United States citizen and must maintain a principal residence in a state in the Bank’s district (or own or lease a residence in the district and be employed in the district). In addition, the individual may not be an officer of any FHLBank or a director, officer, or employee of any member of the Bank or of any recipient of advances from the Bank. Each nonmember independent director who serves as a public interest director must have more than four years of personal experience in representing consumer or community interests in banking services, credit needs, housing, or financial consumer protection. Each nonmember independent director other than a public interest director must have knowledge of, or experience in, financial management, auditing or accounting, risk management practices, derivatives, project development, organizational management, or law.

190152




The term for each director position is four years (unless a shorter term is assigned by the Finance Agency for staggering purposes), and directors are subject to a limit on the number of consecutive terms they may serve. A director elected to three consecutive full terms on the Board is not eligible for election to a term that begins earlier than two years after the expiration of the third consecutive term. On an annual basis, the Bank'sBank’s Board performs a Board assessment that includes consideration of the directors' backgrounds, experience, expertise, Board service, and other factors. Also on an annual basis, each director certifies to the Bank that he or she continues to meet all applicable statutory and regulatory eligibility and qualification requirements. In connection with the election or appointment of a nonmember independent director, the nonmember independent director completes an application form providing information to demonstrate his or her eligibility and qualifications to serve on the Board. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, nothing has come to the attention of the Board or management to indicate that any of the current Board members do not continue to possess the necessary experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills expected of the directors to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board, as described in each director's biography below.

Information regarding the current directors and executive officers of the Bank is provided below. There are no family relationships among the directors or executive officers of the Bank. The Bank'sBank’s Code of Conduct for Senior Officers, which applies to the president, andexecutive vice presidents, certain senior vice presidents, and such other employees serving in a financial reporting oversight role as determined from time to time by the chief financial officer, and any amendments or waivers to the code are disclosed on the Bank'sBank’s website located at www.fhlbsf.com.

The charter of the Audit Committee of the Bank'sBank’s Board is available on the Bank'sBank’s website at www.fhlbsf.com.

Board of Directors

The following table sets forth information (ages as of February 28, 2018)2022) regarding each of the Bank'sBank’s directors.

NameAgeDirector
Since
Expiration of
Current Term
Simone Lagomarsino, Chair(1)(8)
60 20132024
F. Daniel Siciliano, Vice Chair(2)(6)
51 20172024
David Adame(2)(6)
58 20222025
Banafsheh Akhlaghi(2)(7)
53 20222025
Jeffrey K. Ball(3)(8)
57 20182024
Marangal (Marito) Domingo(1)(7)(9)
61 20182025
Lori R. Gay(2)
59 20212024
Melinda Guzman(2)(7)(9)
58 20092023
Matthew Hendricksen(4)(7)(9)
42 20202023
Shruti Miyashiro(1)(6)(8)
51 20202023
Kevin Murray(2)
61 20082023
Joan Opp(1)(6)(8)
55 20182025
Brian M. Riley(5)(6)
57 20152022
Scott C. Syphax(2)(7)(9)
58 20022022
Virginia A. Varela(1)
62 20192022
(1)    Elected by the Bank’s California members eligible to vote.
(2)    Elected as a nonmember independent director by the Bank members eligible to vote. Ms. Guzman also served as an appointive director from April 19, 2007, to December 31, 2008. With the enactment of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 on July 30, 2008, the director positions previously appointed by the Federal Housing Finance Board (appointive director positions) became known as nonmember independent director positions, and the method for filling these positions was changed to election by the Bank members eligible to vote.
(3)    Mr. Ball was elected by the Bank’s California members eligible to vote, for a four-year term beginning January 1, 2021. Previously, Mr. Ball was selected by the Board to fill a vacant California member director position and served from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020.    
(4)    Elected by the Bank’s Nevada members eligible to vote.
(5)    Elected by the Bank’s Arizona members eligible to vote.
(6)    Member of the Audit Committee in 2022.
(7)    Member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in 2022.
(8)    Member of the Audit Committee in 2021. Former director John F. Luikart was also on the Audit Committee in 2021.
(9)    Member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in 2021. Former director John T. Wasley was also on the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in 2021.
153
NameAge
 
Director
Since
 
Expiration of
Current Term
John F. (Jack) Luikart, Chair(1)(8)
68
 2007 2021
Brian M. Riley, Vice Chair(2)(6)(8)
53
 2015 2018
Jeffrey K. Ball(3)(6)
53
 2018 2020
Bradley W. Beal(4)(7)(9)
64
 2014 2019
Craig G. Blunden(5)
70
 2012 2019
Marangal (Marito) Domingo(5)
57
 2018 2021
Melinda Guzman(1)(7)
54
 2009 2019
Simone Lagomarsino(5)(6)(8)(9)
56
 2013 2020
Kevin Murray(1)
57
 2008 2019
Robert F. Nielsen(1)
71
 2009 2020
Joan Opp(5)(6)(7)
51
 2018 2021
John F. Robinson(5)(8)(9)
71
 2011 2018
F. Daniel Siciliano(1)(6)(9)
47
 2017 2020
Scott C. Syphax(1)(7)(8)(9)
54
 2002 2018
John T. Wasley(1)(7)(8)(9)
56
 2007 2021

(1)Elected as a nonmember independent director by the Bank members eligible to vote. Ms. Guzman also served as an appointive director from April 19, 2007, to December 31, 2008. Mr. Nielsen also served as an appointive director from April 19, 2007, to December 31, 2008, and from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Wasley also served as an appointive director from 2003 to 2005. With the enactment of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 on July 30, 2008, the director positions previously appointed by the Federal Housing Finance Board (appointive director positions) became known as nonmember independent director positions, and the method for filling these positions was changed to election by the Bank members eligible to vote.
(2)Elected by the Bank’s Arizona members eligible to vote.
(3)Mr. Ball was selected by the Board to fill a vacant California member director position effective January 1, 2018.    
(4)Mr. Beal was declared elected by the Board as a Nevada director, for a four-year term beginning January 1, 2016. Previously, Mr. Beal was selected by the Board to fill the vacant Nevada director position and served from May 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015.
(5)Elected by the Bank's California members eligible to vote. Mr. Blunden also served as a California director from January 28, 1999, to December 31, 2006. Mr. Robinson also served as a California director from January 1, 2004, to September 11, 2005, and as a Nevada director from January 25, 2007, to October 9, 2008.

191



(6)Member of the Audit Committee in 2018.
(7)Member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in 2018.
(8)Member of the Audit Committee in 2017. Former director Richard A. Heldebrant served on the Audit Committee in 2017.
(9)Member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee in 2017.

The Board has determined that Ms. LagomarsinoOpp is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. The Bank is required by SEC rules to disclose whether Ms. LagomarsinoOpp is independent and is required to use a definition of independence from a national securities exchange or national securities association. The Bank has elected to use the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) definition of independence, and under that definition, Ms. LagomarsinoOpp is independent. In addition, Ms. LagomarsinoOpp is independent according to the rules governing the FHLBanks applicable to members of the audit committees of the boards of directors of the FHLBanks and the independence rules under Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

John F. (Jack) Luikart,Simone Lagomarsino, Chair

John F. (Jack) LuikartSimone Lagomarsino, 60, has been president of Bethany Advisors LLC, San Francisco, California, since February 2007. He has also been a trustee of four asbestos trusts, including the Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, since 2004 and a board member of Wells Fargo Real Estate Investment Trust and Ohio Wesleyan University since 2014. He was senior advisor to the CEO of Red Capital Group from July 2011 to July 2012 and was chairman of Wedbush Securities Inc., Los Angeles, California, from 2006 to 2010. Previously, he was president and chief operating officer of Tucker Anthony Sutro from 2001 to 2002 and chairman and chief executive officer of Sutro & Co.Luther Burbank Corporation, and its subsidiary Luther Burbank Savings, Santa Rosa, California, since January 2019, and a director since November 2018. She is also currently, and has been since 2019, on the board of Hannon Armstrong, a real estate investment trust that provides capital to leading companies in the energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other sustainable infrastructure markets. Beginning in January of 2022, she joined the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco head office. Previously, she was a director of Pacific Premier Bank, Irvine, California, and its holding company, Pacific Premier Bancorp, from 1996April 2017 through November 2018. Ms. Lagomarsino has also been the president and chief executive officer of Western Bankers Association (formerly California Bankers Association) beginning in April 2017 through December 2018. Prior to 2002. He joined Sutro & Co. in 1988 asthat she was chief executive viceofficer and a director of Heritage Oaks Bank and president of capital marketsHeritage Oaks Bancorp, Paso Robles, California, from September 2011, until its merger with Pacific Premier Bank and becamePacific Premier Bancorp in April 2017. Prior to that, Ms. Lagomarsino was president and chief executive officer of Kinecta Federal Credit Union from June 2006 through January 2010. She is a financial services professional with more than 30 years of experience in 1990. Mr. Luikart's positionsexecutive positions. Ms. Lagomarsino’s current position as director orthe principal executive officer of investment banking firms (or their affiliates)a Bank member, her previous director and executive officer positions with other financial institutions, and her involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Lagomarsino’s qualifications to serve on the Bank’s Board.
F. Daniel Siciliano, Vice Chair
F. Daniel Siciliano, 51, is a Stanford Law School fellow (CodeX) and co-founder of Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance. He has previously served as professor of the practice of law, faculty director of the Rock Center for Corporate Governance, and associate dean for executive education and special programs at Stanford Law School, Stanford, California. Mr. Siciliano is currently president and CEO of Nikki, Inc, a fintech start-up that helps individuals and companies access and deploy capital to optimize returns in previously inefficient markets. Mr. Siciliano is the chair of the board of both the American Immigration Council and the Silicon Valley Directors’ Exchange, and serves on the board and as chair of audit for the Latino Corporate Directors Education Foundation. As of 2011, he has been an advisory board member and visiting professor for the Corporate Governance Center and Law School of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Previously, he was co-founder, chief executive officer, and executive chair of LawLogix Group, Inc., a privately held software technology company from 2000 to October 2015. Mr. Siciliano’s current and previous positions as a law professor and director at Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance; his previous experience in investment management, capital markets, corporate finance, securitization, and mortgage financeas an executive officer of a software technology company; and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Luikart'sSiciliano’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

David Adame
Brian M. Riley, Vice Chair

Brian M. RileyDavid Adame has been the president and chief executive officer of Mohave State Bank, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, since March 2009. He has also served as director, president, and chief executive officer of State Bank Corp., the holding company for Mohave State Bank, since March 2009. He was the chief financial officer of Mohave State Bank from April 2008 to March 2009. Prior to that, he was chief executive officer of Harbor Bank and Trust, a financial institution in organization in Southport, Connecticut. Mr. Riley has over 30 years of experience in banking including serving as president and chief executive officer of PriVest Bank, Costa Mesa, California,Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC), one of the nation’s largest community development corporations since 2015. Mr. Adame served as chief operating officer and holding otherchief financial officer from 2008 to 2015, before taking on the position of president and chief executive positions with Provident Savings Bank, Riverside, California, and Metro Commerce Bank, San Rafael, California.officer. Previously, Mr. Riley isAdame was vice president of Arizona operations for McCormack Baron & Salazar, responsible for
154

overseeing the firm’s role in Henson Village, a HOPE VI project in Phoenix. He served as senior deputy director of Fannie Mae’s Arizona partnership office from 1997 to 2003. Prior to that, he worked at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (then called Bank One Arizona) for eight years. Mr. Adame previously served on the Arizona Bankers Association.Bank’s Affordable Housing Advisory Council from 2016 to 2021. Mr. Riley’sAdame's current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member,an affordable housing and community services provider; his previous executive positions with other financial institutions,experience in representing community interests in housing, health and human services, education, economic development, and advocacy, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management financial reporting, and financial management,skills, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Riley’sAdame’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Banafsheh Akhlaghi
Banafsheh Akhlaghi is president and CEO of Akhlaghi Law, Mill Valley, California, an international private law practice founded in 2010. She has over 20 years of experience as founder of a civil rights nonprofit, consultant to the United Nations, and Regional Director with Amnesty International. Her expertise includes Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Risk Management, Legal and Business Strategy, Diversity & Inclusion, and Public Policy. She has been a member since 2010 and was previously chair of, the Legal Services Trust Fund Commission of the State Bar of California, focusing on legal advocacy for underserved and underrepresented populations and homelessness prevention. Ms. Akhlaghi’s current position as a principal in a law firm, her expertise in governance and risk management, and her management skills, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Akhlaghi’s qualifications to serve on the Bank’s Board.
Jeffrey (Jeff) K. Ball

Jeffrey (Jeff) K. Ball has been president, chief executive officer and a directoris the founder of Friendly Hills Bank, Whittier, California, since it was founded in September 2006.and is currently the vice chair and audit committee chair of Friendly Hills Bank and its parent company, Friendly Hills Bancorp. Mr. Ball is also president and chief executive officer of the Orange County Business Council, which is a 501(c)(6) advocacy organization whose mission is to advocate for business, working with government and academia, to enhance economic prosperity and quality of life for all of the region through economic growth and private-public partnerships. Prior to that he was an Executive Vice President with Far East National Bank in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Ball was the president and chief executive officer of Friendly Hills Bank from 2006 through 2021. He is also currently on the board of Data Center Inc., a bank technology company based in Hutchinson, Kansas, where he also serves as chair of the audit committee. Mr. Ball is a director and executivemember of the membership committee member for the American Bankers Association where he previously was a member of the executive committee and chairs their Government Relations Council.board of directors and served as chair of the government relations council administrative committee, of which he remains a member. He is a past chair of the CaliforniaWestern Bankers Association, where he servespreviously served on the board of directors and chairs its Federal Government Relations Committee. Mr. Ball isas chair of the federal government relations committee. He was the lead petitioner for the establishment of the Kinetic Academy Charter School in Huntington Beach, California, where he currently serves as board vice chair. He also serves by appointment on the boardLegal Services Trust Fund of directorsthe State Bar of California for which he previously served as co-chair. Mr. Ball’s current position as a director and audit committee chair for Data Center, Inc.,of a Bank member, audit committee chair of a financial technology company, serving banks and credit unions. He is also the founder and current Board Chair of Kinetic Academy, a K-8 California public charter school, which includesprevious executive positions with financial education in its core curriculum. Mr. Ball’s current

192



position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member, his current position and experience as a board member and audit committee chairman of a financial technology company,institutions, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Ball’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Bradley W. Beal

Bradley W. Beal has been a director of One Nevada Credit Union, Las Vegas, Nevada, since September 2017. He also served as president and chief executive officer of One Nevada Credit Union from February 1990 to March 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Beal was senior vice president operations, Nevada Federal Credit Union (now One Nevada Credit Union) since 1987, and prior to that, president of Nevada State Employees Federal Credit Union, Carson City, Nevada. Mr. Beal is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Nevada CPA Society, and a former board member and chairman of the National Association of Federal Credit Unions. Mr. Beal's current position as a director of a Bank member, and his previous position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Beal's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Craig G. Blunden

Craig G. Blunden has been chairman and chief executive officer of Provident Savings Bank and Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., Riverside, California, since 1991 and 1996, respectively. Mr. Blunden served as president of Provident Savings Bank and Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., from 1991 to June 2011 and from 1996 to June 2011, respectively. He previously served on the Bank's Board from 1999 to 2006. He is currently on the board of directors of the Western Bankers Association. Mr. Blunden is a past chairman of the Western League of Savings Institutions and served on the Thrift Institutions Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve System for two years. Mr. Blunden's current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member and its holding company and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Blunden's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Marangal (Marito) Domingo

Marangal (Marito) Domingo has been the chief investment officer and chief credit officer ofjoined First Technology Federal Credit Union, Mountain View,San Jose, California, sincein March 2013.2013, and currently serves as chief financial officer and chief credit officer. Prior to that, he was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Pacific Trust Bank from 2011 to 2012. Mr. Domingo has over 20 years of experience in banking, including serving as chief financial officer for Doral Bank, senior vice president of finance offor Treasury Bank, chief executive officer of Downey Savings, head of capital markets for Washington Mutual Bank, and treasurer for American Savings. He has also served on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Residential Board of Governors and as a member of the board of directors for the National Equity Fund (affordable housing), Greater Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, and the Beaverton Education Foundation.Foundation, and SMART Reading. Mr. Domingo’s current position as an executive officer of a Bank member, his previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal
155

controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Domingo’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Lori R. Gay
Lori R. Gay has been president and chief executive officer of Neighborhood Housing Services of Los Angeles County (NHS) since 1990. NHS serves as a community development financial institution and full service real estate firm. Ms. Gay has served on numerous boards of directors, including the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Los Angeles Branch, the California Organized Investment Network, and the California Housing Finance Agency. Ms. Gay’s current position as the principal executive officer of an affordable homeownership services provider responsible for reaching families with financial counseling and affordable lending and redevelopment services and her management skills, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Gay’s qualifications to serve as a public interest director on the Bank’s Board.
Melinda Guzman

Melinda Guzman has been a chief executive officer of Melinda Guzman Professional Corporation, Sacramento, California, since 2009. She was a partner with Freeman & Guzman, LLP, a law firm in Sacramento, California, from 1999 to 2015. Prior to that, she was a partner with Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, LLP, also a law firm in Sacramento. Ms. Guzman's practice focuses on tort, labor, insurance, and commercial matters. She

193



previously served on the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors from April 2007 through December 2008. Ms. Guzman's involvement and experience in representing community and consumer interests with respect to banking services, in credit needs, in housing and consumer financial protections, and in corporate governance, as indicated by her background, and her management skills derived from her various legislative appointments and her service from 2002 to 2003 as chair of the Nehemiah Corporation of America (a community development corporation), her service from 2001 to 2004 as chairman of the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and her service with other community-based organizations support Ms. Guzman's qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Matthew Hendricksen
Simone LagomarsinoMatthew Hendricksen joined Employers Insurance Company of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, and the Employers Insurance Group, Inc., in May 2012, and currently serves as senior vice president Treasury and Investments. Prior to that, he was a portfolio manager at AIG from 2003 to 2012. During his 18-year career, Mr. Hendricksen has specialized in investments, derivatives, risk management, and insurance regulations. Mr. Hendricksen’s current position as an officer of a Bank member and his involvement in and knowledge of finance, accounting, internal controls, risk management, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Hendricksen’s qualifications to serve on the Bank’s Board.

Shruti Miyashiro
Simone LagomarsinoShruti Miyashiro has been a director of Pacific Premier Bank, Irvine, California, and its holding company, Pacific Premier Bancorp since April 2017. Ms. Lagomarsino has also been the president and chief executive officer of the Western Bankers Association (formerlyOrange County’s Credit Union, Santa Ana, California Bankers Association) since April 2017.2007. Prior to that, she was chief executive officer and a director of Heritage Oaks Bank and president of Heritage Oaks Bancorp, Paso Robles, California, from September 2011, until its merger with Pacific Premier Bank in April 2017. She also held the position of president of Heritage Oaks Bank from January 2012 through December 2014. Prior to that, Ms. Lagomarsino was president and chief executive officer of KinectaPasadena Federal Credit Union, from June 2006 through January 2010.and Orange County Group, Inc., which provided wealth management to consumers. Ms. Miyashiro has over 20 years of multi-faceted executive level roles leading branches, lending, collections, human resources, enterprise risk management, facilities, and digital banking. She is currently serving on the board of Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., a technology provider to financial services professional with more than 30 yearsinstitutions. She has also been appointed to the State of experience in executive positions.California’s Department of Business Oversight Credit Union Advisory Committee. Ms. Lagomarsino'sMiyashiro’s current position as a directorthe principal executive officer of a Bank member, her previous executive positions as chief executive officer or chief financial officer of Bank members orwith other financial institutions, and her involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Lagomarsino'sMiyashiro’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

156

Kevin Murray

Kevin Murray has been a principal in The Murray Group, a legal and consulting firm, since its founding in December 2006. Since May 2011, Mr. Murray has served as the president and chief executive officer of the Weingart Center Association. Mr. Murray was senior vice president of the William Morris Agency, Beverly Hills, California, from January 2007 to June 2009, working primarily in the company's corporate consulting division. Mr. Murray served as a California State Senator from December 1998 until November 2006, and as a California State Assembly member from December 1994 until November 1998. Prior to serving in the California State Legislature, Mr. Murray practiced law. Mr. Murray's involvement in legislative matters relating to, among other things, the banking and insurance industries, his experience in law and corporate governance practices, and his management skills, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Murray's qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Robert F. Nielsen

Robert F. Nielsen has been president of Shelter Properties, Inc., a real estate development and management company based in Reno, Nevada, since 1979. Mr. Nielsen is a member of the National Association of Home Builders and was its chairman in 2011. He is also a past chairman of the State of Nevada Housing Division Advisory Committee. He previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 1999 to 2001 and from April 2007 through December 2008. Mr. Nielsen's involvement and experience in representing community interests in affordable housing development and his management skills, as indicated by his background, and his role with the Affordable Housing Resource Council (a former nonprofit organization designed to provide technical assistance in affordable housing) and the Neighborhood Development Collaborative (owner and manager of affordable housing rental properties) support Mr. Nielsen's qualifications to serve as a public interest director on the Bank's Board. Mr. Nielsen is a principal shareholder and president of IDN1 Inc., which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit property in Reno, Nevada. This property is owned by Northwest Partners, L.P., whose general partners are Santorini Corp., IDN1 Inc., and Community Services Agency Development Corporation, a nonprofit corporation under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). Northwest Partners, L.P., filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on November 17, 2011. A plan of reorganization was confirmed by the court on February 25, 2013. Mr. Nielsen is also a managing member of Karen Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability

194



company, which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit property in Las Vegas, Nevada. This property was owned by Karen Partners, L.P., whose general partners are Karen Partners, LLC, and Community Services Agency Development Corporation. Karen Partners, L.P., filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on December 19, 2011. On November 26, 2012, the automatic stay was rescinded, and this property was foreclosed upon on December 19, 2012. Mr. Nielsen is also a manager of Ridge Seniors, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit program in Henderson, Nevada. This property is owned by Ridge Partners L.P., whose general partners are Ridge Seniors, LLC, and Silver Sage Manor, Inc. On March 15, 2012, Ridge Partners L.P. filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. A plan of reorganization was confirmed by the court on December 5, 2013. Mr. Nielsen is also principal shareholder and president of SUP III, Inc., which is a general partner in a multifamily tax credit property in Las Vegas, Nevada. This property was owned by East Freemont II L.P., whose general partners are SUP III, Inc., and SPE 2, LLC. East Freemont II L.P. filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on June 21, 2012. The automatic stay was rescinded and this property was foreclosed upon on October 21, 2013.

Joan C. Opp

Joan C. Opp has been the president and chief executive officer of Stanford Federal Credit Union, Palo Alto, California, since May 2010. From February 2002 to April 2010, she was executive vice president and chief financial officer for Texas Trust Credit Union overseeing accounting, information technology, marketing and business services, as well as three credit union service organizations. Prior to that, Ms. Opp, a Certified Public Accountant, was a partner with the CPA firm of Clifton Gunderson, LLP, and is a Certified Public Accountant.LLP. Ms. Opp serves on the board of directors of CO-OP Financial. Ms. Opp’s current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member, her previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and her involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Opp’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Brian M. Riley
John F. Robinson

John F. RobinsonBrian M. Riley has been a director of Silicon ValleyOxford Life Insurance Company, Phoenix, Arizona, since November 2019. He has also been the president and chief executive officer of Foothills Bank (SVB)(a division of Glacier Bank, Kalispell, Montana) since March 2020. Previously, Mr. Riley was the president and chief executive officer of State Bank of Arizona (formerly Mohave State Bank), Santa Clara,Lake Havasu City, Arizona, from March 2009 to February 2020. He also served as director, president, and chief executive officer of State Bank Corp., the holding company for State Bank of Arizona, from March 2009 to February 2020. Mr. Riley has also served as a director of Clearinghouse CDFI, Lake Forest, California, since August 2018. He was the chief financial officer of Mohave State Bank from April 2008 to March 2009. Prior to that, he was chief executive officer of Harbor Bank and Trust, a financial institution in Southport, Connecticut. Mr. Riley has over 30 years of experience in banking, including serving as president and chief executive officer of PriVest Bank, Costa Mesa, California, and its holding company, SVB Financial Group, since July 2010. He chairs the SVB board’s audit committeeother executive positions with Provident Savings Bank, Riverside, California, and Metro Commerce Bank, San Rafael, California. Mr. Riley is a chartered financial analyst. From 2002 to 2008, he was executive vice president of Washington Mutual Bank. From 1987 to 2002, he served in several senior bank regulatory roles, including Deputy Comptrollerdirector of the Currency for the Western District and Assistant Director for Policy and Western Region Director for the Office of Thrift Supervision.Arizona Bankers Association. Mr. Robinson previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 2004 to 2005 and 2007 to 2008. From 2002 to 2013, he was a member of the national board and executive board for Operation HOPE, an international nonprofit organization focused on financial literacy and empowerment. Mr. Robinson'sRiley’s current position as the director of a Bank member, previous positions as an executive officera director of a Bank member and a senior bank regulator,principal executive officer of a financial institution, his previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Robinson'sRiley’s qualifications to serve on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

F. Daniel Siciliano

F. Daniel Siciliano is the co-founder of Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance and is the current co-director of the Rock Center’s Directors’ College. He has previously served as professor of the practice of law, faculty director of the Rock Center for Corporate Governance, and associate dean for executive education and special programs at Stanford Law School, Stanford, California. Mr. Siciliano is currently the chair of the board of trustees of the American Immigration Council and Co-Chair of the We Robot Conference on AI, Robotics, and Public Policy. As of 2011, he has been an advisory board member and visiting professor for the Corporate Governance Center and Law School of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Previously, he was co-founder, chief executive officer, and executive chairman of LawLogix Group, Inc., a privately held software technology company from 2000 to October 2015. Mr. Siciliano’s current and previous positions as a law professor and director

195



at Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance, his previous experience as an executive officer of a software technology company; and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management as indicated by his background, support Mr. Siciliano’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Scott C. Syphax

Scott C. Syphax has been the CEO of Syphax Strategic Inc., a management consulting and business development firm focused on the real estate development, healthcare, and community finance sector,sectors, since February 2017 and2017. Mr. Syphax has also served on the board of the ProAssurance Insurance Corporation since 2021. Mr. Syphax served as chairman of Nehemiah Corporation of America, a community development corporation in Sacramento, California, since 2011.from 2011 to 2019. He previously held the position of chief executive officer of Nehemiah Corporation of America and its affiliates from 2001 to 2017, and was president from 2001 through June 2015.2017. Mr. Syphax has also beenserved as a board member of the Board of DirectorsSacramento Regional Community Foundation since 2016, and served as a director on the board of the Greenlining Institute since 2017.from 2016 to 2019. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Syphax was a manager of public affairs for Eli Lilly & Company. He was vice chair of the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors from January 2010 through January 2012. Mr. Syphax's involvement and
157

experience in representing community interests in housing and his management skills, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Syphax's qualifications to serve as a public interest director on the Bank'sBank’s Board.

Virginia A. Varela
John T. Wasley

John T. WasleyVirginia A. Varela has been an officer of SoFi Bank, National Association (SoFi) and president of the Golden Pacific Bank division of SoFi, based in Sacramento, California, since February 22, 2022, when SoFi, Inc., a consultant with Spencer Stuart, a global retainedfinancial technology firm, acquired Golden Pacific Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary Golden Pacific Bank. Previously, Ms. Varela was the president and chief executive search firm, in their Los Angeles, California office, since 2017.officer of Golden Pacific Bancorp and Golden Pacific Bank from November 2013 to February 2022. Prior to that, heMs. Varela was a managing partner with Caldwell Partners, Los Angeles, California, from 2013 to 2017, and was a managing partner with Heidrick & Struggles, Los Angeles, Californiachief operating officer of Bank of the Orient from June 20052012 to 2013. Mr. Wasley joined Heidrick & StrugglesAugust 2013; chief executive officer, president, and a director of Bank of Rio Vista from December 2010 to July 2012; and president, chief operating officer, and a director of San Luis Trust Bank from September 2009 to November 2010. Ms. Varela has more than 30 years of experience within the banking industry, both as a partner in 2001. Previously, he was ancommunity bank executive director with Russell Reynolds Associates and as a former regulator. She has served as senior vice president of People'sexaminer for the Federal Reserve Bank of California. He previously served onSan Francisco and as assistant regional director in the Bank's BoardWashington, D.C., headquarters of Directors from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Wasley'sthe Office of Thrift Supervision. Ms. Varela currently serves as a director of the Western Bankers Association. Ms. Varela’s current position as an officer of a Bank member, her previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and her involvement in and knowledge of human resources, compensation practices, and corporate governance, practices,finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and hisfinancial management, skills, as indicated by hisher background, above, along with his previous position as an executive officer of a financial institution with which Mr. Wasley had involvement in or knowledge of corporate governance practices, bank relations, financial operations, treasury functions, and financial management, support Mr. Wasley'sMs. Varela’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Executive Officers

Teresa Bryce Bazemore
J. Gregory Seibly

J. Gregory Seibly, 54,Teresa Bryce Bazemore, 62, is currently serving as president and chief executive officer. She has beenheld the position of president and chief executive officer since May 2016.March 2021. Prior to joining the Bank, heMs. Bazemore served as the president of consumer banking at Umpqua BankRadian Guaranty from itsJuly 2008 until her retirement in April 2014 merger with Sterling2017, where she oversaw the strategic planning, business development, and operations of the mortgage insurance business line. Prior to being appointed as the president of Radian Guaranty, Ms. Bazemore served as executive vice president, general counsel, and corporate secretary from October 2006 to July 2008, and added the role of chief risk officer of Radian Group in February 2007. Before joining the Radian Group, Ms. Bazemore was the vice president, general counsel, and secretary for Nexstar Financial Corporation, (Sterling) untilfrom June 2000 to May 2016. From October 20092006, and before that she was the general counsel of the mortgage banking line of business at Bank of America from March 1997 to April 2014, heMay 2000. Following her retirement from Radian Guaranty, Ms. Bazemore served as president and chief executive officer of Sterling and as a member of the board of directors. Before joining Sterling in 2007, he was presidentdirectors of U.S. Bank –FHLBank of Pittsburgh from August 2017 until March 2019, when she relocated to California. With 30 yearsIn addition, Ms. Bazemore currently is a member of industry experience, Mr. Seibly has also held executive-level positions in commercial banking at Wells Fargo Bank and in healthcare finance at Bank of America. He currently serves on the board of directors of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., and the Pacific Coast Bankers School.T. Rowe Price Funds where she serves as the audit committee chair. She previously served as a member of the board of directors of Chimera Investment Corporation from November 2017 to February 2021. Ms. Bazemore is also the founder of Bazemore Consulting, LLC. Professional appointments she has held include: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Economic Advisory Council, Fannie Mae National Advisory Council, and Consumer Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve.

Joseph E. Amato
Elena Andreadakis

Elena Andreadakis, 56,Joseph E. Amato, 63, is currently serving as executive vice president and chief financial officer. He has beenheld the position of executive vice president and chief financial officer since May 13, 2021. Mr. Amato joined the Bank as executive vice president and senior financial officer on October 9, 2020, and served as the Bank’s interim chief financial officer from January 4, 2021, until his appointment as the Bank’s chief financial officer. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Amato was chief financial officer at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines from May 2016 to June 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Amato served in various capacities at Freddie Mac from 2001 until 2016, most recently serving as senior vice president chief administrative officer since March 2017. Previously, Ms. Andreadakis wasand CFO, investments and financial planning.
158

Arlene Coyle
Arlene Coyle, 49, is currently serving as senior vice president and chief audit executive. She has held the position of chief audit executive since May 2019. Ms. Coyle joined the Bank in February 2016 as assistant vice president, internal audit, and was promoted to vice president in February 2017. Ms. Coyle has over 20 years of internal audit and regulatory experience in the financial services industry. Before joining the Bank, she worked at TIAA in their Internal Audit function. Prior to TIAA, she worked as a bank examiner for the Federal Reserve System, supporting community and regional banks. She has a Certification in Risk Management Assurance and is a Certified Internal Auditor, a Certified Financial Services Auditor, and a Certified Diversity Professional.
Kwame Fields
Kwame Fields, 46, is currently serving as senior vice president, chief information security officer, and chief diversity officer. Mr. Fields has held the positions of chief information security officer since December 2017 and chief diversity officer since July 2021. Previously, he was acting chief diversity officer from May 2011July 2020 to March 2017.July 2021. Mr. Fields has over 25 years of information security and risk management experience across multiple industries. Prior to joining the Bank, shehe was a senior vice president at Fidelity Investments,E*TRADE, where shehe had worked since 1992. She most recently2014. He led the servicetechnology and program management group for Fidelity's enterprise infrastructure organization.security oversight and governance organization and was a principal in the creation of their diversity and inclusion council. Prior to that, Ms. AndreadakisMr. Fields held a number of other senior-level businessmanagement roles and information technologyoversight positions with responsibility for managing a wide range of systemsinformation security, business continuity, information technology risk management, and diversity initiatives. Mr. Fields is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional and a Certified Diversity Professional.
Kelly Gear
Kelly Gear, 48, is currently serving as senior vice president, chief of staff and corporate services. She has held the position of chief of staff and corporate services since January 2022. Ms. Gear joined the Bank in August 2011 as vice president of IT planning and program services. Ms. Gear has over 25 years of management consulting and organizational leadership experience across highly regulated industries, including financial services, pharmaceuticals, and aerospace and defense. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Gear served on several executive committees overseeing large-scale global business initiatives.

196



transformations and strategic initiatives for PricewaterhouseCoopers and Johns Manville, a Berkshire Hathaway company. She is Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and a Certified Diversity Professional.
Kevin A. Gong

Kevin A. Gong, 58, has been62, is currently serving as senior vice president and chief corporate securities counsel. He has held the position of chief corporate securities counsel since April 2005. Mr. Gong joined the Bank in 1997 as vice president and associate general counsel. He has previous experience as a senior attorney with the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an attorney in private practice, and as an attorney with the SEC in both the Division of Corporation Finance and the Division of Market Regulation.

Anne Segrest McCulloch
Janet (Jan) Homan

Janet (Jan) Homan, 58,Anne Segrest McCulloch, 63, is currently serving as executive vice president, chief legal officer, and corporate secretary. She has beenheld the positions of chief legal officer and corporate secretary since November 2021. She provides legal counsel to the Bank’s management and board of directors on legal and regulatory matters affecting the development and execution of the Bank’s business strategies, policies, and practices. She also directs and manages the Bank’s legal staff, outside counsel, and public affairs team. Ms. McCulloch is a seasoned financial services and housing industry executive and regulatory attorney. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. McCulloch was president and chief executive office of Housing Partnership Equity Trust from April 2017 through November 17, 2021. Previously, she held several senior positions in the housing sector, including senior vice president, credit and housing access, for Fannie Mae through March 2017. She is currently the chair of the National Housing Conference.
159

Maxine Moir
Maxine Moir, 51, is currently serving as senior vice president and chief human resources officer. She has held the position of chief human resources officer since February 2017.2020. Previously, Ms. HomanMoir was also the Bank’s officesenior vice president and director of minority and women inclusion officerhuman resources from FebruaryJuly 2017 to June 2017.February 2020. Prior to joining the Bank, sheMs. Moir served as head of human resources of MACH Energy from 2007 to 2015. From 2000 to 2007, Ms. Homan served as seniordirector, global human resources business partner, and principalat BlackRock, where she provided human resources support for the iShares business. Her experience also includes 17 years of Barclays Global Investor, and from 1991 to 2000 she was senior vice president, personnelprogressively more complex human resources executive forresponsibilities at Bank of America.America, where she led regional and national teams. Ms. Moir holds a Senior Certified Professional credential from the Society of Human Resources Management.

Michael Rich
Kenneth C. Miller

Kenneth C. Miller, 65, has beenMichael Rich, 52, is currently serving as senior vice president and chief financialinformation officer. He has held the position of chief information officer since August 2011. Previously,January 2022. Mr. Miller was senior vice president, financial risk management and strategic planning, from 2001 to August 2011. Mr. MillerRich joined the Bank in July 19942011 as vice president, financial risk management. Previously, Mr. Miller held the position of senior vice president, asset liability management, at First Nationwide Bank.

Lawrence H. Parks

Lawrence H. Parks, 56, has been senior vice president, external, legislative, and regulatory affairs since March 2017. Previously, he was senior vice president, external and legislative affairs, from 1997 to March 2017.
Mr. Parks had previous experience at the U.S. Department of Commerce as senior policy advisor to the Secretary, with the Mortgage Bankers Association as associate legislative counsel/director, and with the U.S. Senate Banking Committee as legislative counsel.

Patricia M. Remch

Patricia M. Remch, 65, has been senior vice president, sales, marketing, and business development since March 2017. Previously, Ms. Remch was senior vice president, sales and marketing, from August 2011 to March 2017, and was senior vice president, mortgage finance sales and product development, from February 2005 to August 2011. She joined the Bank as an economist in 1982, was promoted to capital markets specialist, and became vice president, sales manager, in 1998.

Suzanne Titus-Johnson

Suzanne Titus-Johnson, 60, has been senior vice president and general counsel since April 2005, and she has also served as corporate secretary since October 2007. Ms. Titus-Johnson joined the Bank as a staff attorney in 1986, was promoted to assistant vice president and associate general counsel in 1992, to vice president and associate general counsel in 1997, and to vice president and assistant general counsel in 2003.

Stephen P. Traynor

Stephen P. Traynor, 61, has been senior vice president, chief banking officer since March 2017. Previously, Mr. Traynor was senior vice president, member financial services and community investment, from July 2004 to March 2017. He joined the Bank in 1995 as assistant treasurersolution delivery, and was promoted to senior vice president, sales and marketing,chief technology officer in October 1999. Before joining the2017. Mr. Rich has spent over 30 years in financial services technology, starting his career at Montgomery Securities which became part of Bank Mr. Traynor held vice president positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. and at Homestead Savingsof America via acquisition in the areas1998. At Bank of mortgage banking, fixed income securities, derivatives,America, he served as a managing director in various technology leadership roles for global markets, enterprise architecture, and capital markets.management.

Gregory A. Ward
197



Lisa Violet

Lisa Violet, 49, has been seniorGregory A. Ward, 52, is currently serving as executive vice president and chief risk officer. He has held the position of chief risk officer since April 2017. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Violet was theMay 2019. Previously, Mr. Ward served as chief audit executive at Hitachi Data Systems from 2014July 2017 to 2017.April 2019. Prior to her tenure at Hitachi Data Systems, she served in a number of senior positions in the banking industry, at institutions including Wells Fargo & Company and MUFG Union Bank, and was chief risk officer at the Bank of the Orient. Ms. Violet is a Chartered Accountant.

Gregory A. Ward

Gregory A. Ward, 48, has been senior vice president,his position as chief audit executive, since July 2017. Previously, Mr. Ward wasserved as senior vice president and director, internal audit, from January 2017 to July 2017. He joined the Bank in November 2013 as vice president, internal audit, and was promoted to deputy director in June 2016. Before joining the Bank, he worked with Ernst & Young LLP for 12 years in its Financial Services Advisory Practice. Prior to his tenure at Ernst & Young, Mr. Ward worked in the captive insurance industry in Bermuda and for Price Waterhouse in the United Kingdom in its external audit practice. He is a Chartered Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor, Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist, and Project Management Professional.
Anthony T. Wong
Anthony T. Wong, 56, is currently serving as executive vice president and chief banking officer. He has held the position of chief banking officer since April 2020. Previously, Mr. Wong was senior vice president, member financial services, and chief marketing officer. He joined the Bank in 1995 and has held various positions with increasing responsibilities during his tenure. Prior to joining the Bank, he worked in the capital markets group at Wells Fargo Nikko Investment Advisors. He is a Certified Mortgage Banker, Accredited Mortgage Professional, and Certified Internal Auditor.Diversity Professional.


ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section provides information on the compensation program of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) for our named executive officers for 2017.2021. Our named executive officers for 2021 are individuals who served as our principal executive officers,officer(s), our principal financial officer,officer(s), and our other three most highly compensated executive officers.

160

Compensation and Human Resources Committee

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (Compensation Committee) of the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors (Board) is responsible for, among other things, reviewing and making recommendations to the full Board regarding compensation and incentive plan awards for the Bank'sBank’s eligible senior executive officers (the president and each executive vice president, and any senior vice presidents, other than the Chief Audit Executive, for whom compensation is established by the Audit Committee)president as of December 31, 2018). The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding compensation for the directors. For 2018,2022 and 2021, the Compensation Committee consists of five members of the Board. In 2017, the Compensation Committee consisted of six members of the Board. The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a Board-approved charter and may rely on the assistance, advice, and recommendations of the Bank'sBank’s management and other advisors and may refer specific matters to other committees of the Board. In addition, the Risk Committee of the Board is responsible for oversight of the Bank'sBank’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including overseeing an annual executive incentive compensation risk assessment of the Bank'sBank’s compensation policies and practices for the Bank's employees.

Bank’s senior executive officers.
Certain members of senior management assist the Compensation Committee in its responsibilities by providing compensation and performance information regarding our executive officers.

With respect to the compensation of the named executive officers of a Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) requires that an FHLBank provide the Finance Agency with copies of all materials related to the compensation decisions of the FHLBank's board of directorsFHLBank’s Board for its review prior to the compensation decisions taking effect.

The Finance Agency’s Advisory Bulletin 2009-AB-02 outlines several principles for sound incentive compensation practices to which the FHLBanks are expected to adhere in setting executive compensation policies and practices. The Finance Agency’s rule setting forth requirements and processes with respect to compensation provided to certain executive officers by FHLBanks and the Office of Finance addresses the authority of the Finance Agency Director to approve, disapprove, prohibit, or withhold the compensation of certain executive officers of the FHLBanks and the Office of Finance.Finance executive officers. The rule also addresses the Director’s authority to approve, in advance, agreements or

198



contracts of certain executive officers that provide compensation in connection with termination of employment. The rule prohibits an FHLBank or the Office of Finance from paying compensation to certain executive officers that is not reasonable and comparable to compensation paid by similar businesses for similar duties and responsibilities.

In this regard, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter in December 2020 that outlines 3 points of guidance related to the Finance Agency’s perspective on FHLBank executive compensation and is intended to provide greater clarity about the factors FHFA considers relevant in making compensation-related determinations.
Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and Executive Compensation Program

The Bank has a Board-approved Executive Compensation Philosophy that forms the basis of our executive compensation program. In accordance with our Executive Compensation Philosophy, we believe that to attract and retain outstanding executives we must be able to provide an executive compensation package that is competitive and appropriately motivates and rewards the executive officers who make contributions of special importance to the success of the Bank'sBank’s business. Our executive compensation program provides total remuneration, which includes base salary, short- and long-term cash incentive compensation, and retirement benefits.

The Bank'sBank’s Executive Compensation Philosophy states that total compensation is intended to align the interests of the executives and key employees with the short-term and long-term interests of the Bank,Bank; to ensure an appropriate level of competitiveness within the marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent,talent; and to encourage the executives and other key employees to remain employed withby the Bank. The Bank'sBank’s Executive Compensation Philosophy provides that total remuneration (base salary, short- and long-term cash incentives, and retirement benefits) is also intended to motivate executives to deliver exceptional performance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

Total Compensation is Intended to Reward ContributionContributions to the Bank'sBank’s Corporate Goals and Performance Targets and Achievement of Individual Performance Goals. We have structured our executive compensation program to
161

reward contributions by executives in support of the Bank'sBank’s corporate goals and performance targets, including those set forth in the Bank'sBank’s strategic plan, and achievement of individual performance goals. In addition to base salary, our cash incentive compensation plans create an award program for executives who contribute to and influence the achievement of the Bank'sBank’s mission and other key objectives contained in the Bank'sBank’s strategic plans, and who are responsible for the Bank'sBank’s performance. The Bank'sBank’s overall executive compensation programs reward sustained performance through the balanced use of short- and long-term incentives, which represent a substantial portion of pay at-risk,pay-at-risk, and through competitive retirement benefits, which promote the alignment of executive and Bank interests over the long term.

Beginning with 2017, the Board replaced the Bank’s traditional short- and long-term executive incentive plans as part of the Bank’s overall compensation program and effectively combined short-term and long-term executive incentive programs into one omnibus incentive plan for all senior executive officers (the Executive Incentive Plan, “EIP”). See “Executive Incentive Plan” below for a discussion of the EIP for 2017. For information regarding the Bank’s traditional short-term executive incentive plans (e.g., the 2016 President’s Incentive Plan and the 2016 Executive Incentive Plan) and traditional long-term executive incentive plan (e.g., the 2016 Executive Performance Unit Plan), see the discussion in “Item 11. Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Short-Term Cash Incentive Plans: President's Incentive Plan and Executive Incentive Plan” and “Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan” in the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Each Year, the Bank Establishes Specific Corporate Goals Consistent with the Bank'sBank’s Strategic Plan. For 2017,2021, the Board adopted four corporate goals: the Risk Management goal, the Franchise Enhancement goal, the Community Investment goal, and the Organizational Health/Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) goal.

For 2017, theThe Risk Management goal focusedcomprised three components: (i) Credit and Collateral Risk Management– Improve Underwriting Efficiency, Quality, and Frameworks; (ii) Operational Risk Management – Enhance Framework and Coverage; and (iii)LIBOR – Execute London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) Transition Plan (Transition Plan).
The credit and collateral risk management goal component was intended to strengthen the Bank’s credit and collateral management through a focus on risk frameworks, systems, methodologies, and process efficiencies that enable the Bank to continue to be a strong and reliable funding partner for its members during the current operating environment (including the challenges introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic).
The operational risk management goal component was intended to strengthen the Bank’s “Operational Risk Management” framework and coverage to help reinforce the Bank’s commitment to overall “safety and soundness” and heightened regulatory expectations, and to evolve activities to align with industry-leading practices. This goal included developing a multi-year Operational Risk Assessment Plan that will help align risk identification, quantification, and treatment activities across all business units. In anticipation of increasing regulatory expectations related to data management, the Bank was to benchmark current practices against a data management maturity model and identify, and begin remediation of, any areas of improvement.
The LIBOR goal component was to execute the Bank’s LIBOR Transition Plan. This goal reflected components in the Transition Plan that are “must do” requirements and those that are designed to best position the Bank for the future. To continue to execute the LIBOR transition plan and prepare for the cessation of LIBOR, the Bank must be prepared to meet regulatory expectations and ensure the full protection of collateral supporting the Bank’s advances. Under the Transition Plan, any remaining LIBOR exposure on the Bank’s Technology Resiliency initiative withbalance sheet requires active management to either eliminate the objective of implementing critical business process applicationsLIBOR exposure, where appropriate, or to integrate and mitigating certain physical location risks. In addition, the Risk Management goal focused management on business continuity and crisis management by continuing to enhance the Bank’s recovery resilience by further maturing the enterprise crisis management framework through increased crisis team member preparedness, along with continued integration of the Bank’soperationalize new fallback provisions into existing systems, particularly for derivatives.

199



information services disaster recovery and information security incident response protocols to ensure a cohesive recovery.

The Franchise Enhancement goal for 2017 had three components. 2021 comprised four goal components: (i) Financial Performance – Adjusted Return on Capital (AROC) Spread; (ii) Operating Efficiency – Operating Expense Management; (iii) Member Business – Advances and Letters of Credit Volume; and (iv) Talent – Talent Development and Return to Office (RTO) Strategy.
The first was a financial performance goal component measuring the adjusted return on capital spread to a designated benchmark. This goal component recognized that among the many attributes of Bank membership, an adequate financial return on the private capital that members contribute to the cooperative is important to the members as shareholders. The weighting of this goal acknowledged that the return on members’ capital investment is only one of many aspects of the value of membership. The financial performance goal component was expressed as a target adjusted return on capitalpercentage of AROC spread, (AROCS), which is the adjusted return on capital less the benchmark yield on capital. This goal componentThe Meets level of achievement of 2.40% AROC spread was based on the 20172021 base case financial plan. Achievement ofprojections from the Meets (100% of target) level of 3.06% AROCS required2021-2023 Strategic Plan, which was designed to be reasonably challenging to accomplish, andwould require that the Bank:
price advances such that balances are maintained without diluting financial return;
generate $280$224 million in spread earnings from the Bank’s portfolio of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage loans; and
162

manage operating costs within 20172021 budget levels while continuing to meet all strategic and operating objectives.

ThisIn recognition of the anticipated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economic and financial markets environment in 2021 and reduced opportunities to improve financial performance to above base case plan projected levels through new MBS investments, this goal component was designed to be reasonably challenging to accomplish because, among other things, it required the Bank to generate pre-assessment net income (excluding the impact of other-than-temporary impairment charges and gains on litigation settlements) significantly higher than 2017 projections to reach and exceed the target levels.accomplish. Given the limited options the Bank has to increasehad for increasing earnings in 2021 while staying within the Bank’s mission and risk tolerances, the achievement of levels above the target level represented significant stretch objectives.

The secondFor the operating efficiency goal component, of the Franchise Enhancement goalpurpose was to implementcreate incentives to operate at or below the Bank’s operating cost efficiency initiative, which required the Bank to perform analyses and develop preliminary objectives and operational plans leading to improved operating efficiency and meaningful and sustainable long-term annual run-rateapproved 2021 operating expense reductions, relativebudget and to communicate the 2016importance of cost management and operating expense budget.

efficiency.
The third component of the 2017 Franchise Enhancement goal was designed to focus management on member business by: (i) achievingand measure how well the Bank maintained and increased the volume of advances and letters of credit targeted volumes;outstanding to members, which is a key to enhancing the Bank’s member business franchise and (ii) increasing member engagement.fulfilling the Bank’s mission. The Board set the target achievement levels for the targeted volumes of advances and letters of credit volumes based on various assumptions, such as economic forecasts, member information, potential member business, historical goal performance, industry trends and events, and current market environment and conditions, such that the relative difficulty of achieving the target levelvolume levels was commensurate with extending credit to members in a safe and sound manner.

The fourth component of the Franchise Enhancement goal was designed to focus management on talent development and the Bank’s RTO strategy. This would enhance the Bank’s succession planning process, further develop the Bank’s talent pipeline, and establish the Bank’s RTO framework to ensure the Bank is fully prepared and ready, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, to support re-opening the office(s) when appropriate and necessary.
Consistent with the Bank'sBank’s public policy purposes,purpose, the Community Investment goal for 2017 focused management on meeting the Bank'sBank’s objective to make availableof making advances and credit programs that promote and assist housing and community economic development activities andavailable to provide resources and assistance to membersmembers. Achievement in achieving their community lending goals. These efforts both complement and constitute elementsthis area is a key element of the Bank's core businessBank’s mission objectives, and mission endeavors. The Community Investmentthe participation of Bank members is critical. This goal for 2017 included achievement levels forfor: (i) the number of members that used an advance or letter of credit under the Community Investment Program (CIP) or Advances for Community Enterprise (ACE) Program and (ii) the number of members that participatedreceived an award in the Access to Housing and Economic Assistance for Development (AHEAD) Program during 2017.

2021.
The Organizational Health/DiversityBank’s DEI goal supports the Bank’s three-year DEI Strategic Plan. The purpose of the goal was to provide an anchor for the organization to focus internal- and Inclusionexternal-facing DEI activities. The goal recognizedfor the year was to use the Bank’s employees, resources, and partnerships to positively impact the homeownership and wealth gap in underrepresented communities that organizational healthhas been found to be rooted in the limited access to financial planning and culture play an important rolehomeownership tools available in maximizingminority communities. The goal demonstrates the long-term performanceBank’s commitment to a diverse workforce by including target ranges for diverse representation and successis in alignment with human resource practices at the Bank that ensure diverse representation and is intended to underscore the importance of the work force diversity targets for the Bank and enhance the supplier diversity initiatives in 2021. The Bank believes that promoting diversity and inclusion is integral to achieving this objective. This goal specifically recognized that placingthese efforts will serve as a high value on the individual skills, talents, ideas, viewpoints, and experiences ofcatalyst for an increase in employee engagement with the Bank’s team members helps the Bank gain a broader perspective when it comesefforts to meeting the diverseadvance racial equity in homeownership and changing needs of our members and the communities the Bank serves and that promoting vendor and supplier diversity at all levels of the Bank directly contributes to the Bank’s mission of fostering strong and vibrant communities through economic development opportunities. For 2017, this goal focused the Bank on: providing diversity and inclusion training to all employees, developing and implementing a formal supplier diversity program, presenting a “Leadership Series” for key groups of women and mwealth building.

200



inorities in Bank leadership positions (Women in Leadership Series and Minorities in Leadership Series), and developing and implementing a formal minority, women, and disabled internship program.

Each Year, the Bank Establishes Individual Goals for Executives Consistent with the Bank'sBank’s Strategic Plan. The individual performance goals established for executive officers are generally based on the Bank's strategic planBank’s Strategic Plan and reflect the strategic objectives that will enable the Bank to successfully achieve its mission. The Bank’s 2021 strategic objectives for 2017 were intended to: strengthen(i) maximize the Bank's financialvalue of membership by providing a best-in-class, all-in value of membership; (ii) foster an exceptional workplace by cultivating a great place to work where diverse backgrounds are valued and member services franchise; reduceteam members are inspired to do their best work in support of the Bank’s core operating expenses relative to the 2016 Budgetmission; (iii) develop a more fully resilient and flexible Bank that can adapt to a sustainablehybrid work future that includes both working in the office and scale-appropriate levelworking from home while retaining and enhancingcontinuing to support the Bank’s ability to efficiently and effectively deliver value to members, manage risks, and satisfy compliance obligations; promote and enhance the effectivenesschanging needs of the Bank’s Affordable Housing Program and Community Investment Programs; strengthen the Bank’s organizational effectiveness by enhancing the Bank’s working environment and advancing diversity and inclusion; and position the Bankas a proactive thought-leader for members and the FHLBank System.communities; and (iv) strengthen communities by providing members with financial resources and technical expertise to promote affordable housing and economic development.

163

The Bank'sBank’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plans were Designed to Calculate Executive Officers' Achievement Levels on a Weighted Basis to Ensure a Proper Balance in Achieving the Bank'sBank’s Mission in a Safe and Sound Manner. With respect to each of the named executive officers for 2017,2021, the achievement levels of each of the four Bank corporate goals (the Risk Management goal, the Franchise Enhancement goal, the Community Investment goal, and the Organizational Health/Diversity and InclusionDEI goal) were weighted for each officer type (president, executive vice president, senior vice president, and senior vice president and chief risk officer) based on their respective roles and areas of oversight. The four Bank corporate goals were weighted at 90%80% in the aggregate andwith the individual goal weighted at 10%20% of the total weighted achievement level for each officer.

See “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan” below for the individual corporate goal weights.
The weightings of the Bank'sBank’s corporate goals were approved by the Board and were designed to appropriately focus senior management on accomplishing the Bank'sBank’s mission and strategic plan. See “Executive Incentive Plan” below for a discussion of the relative weights given to corporate goals and individual goals for each component of the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) for 20172021 for the named executive officers.

Our Executive Compensation Program is Designed to Enable the Bank to Compete for Highly Qualified Executive Talent. Our members are best served when we attract and retain talented executives with competitive and fair compensation packages. In 2017, our objective was to create an executive compensation program that delivered2021, the Bank evaluated total compensation packages that generally fellremuneration around the median (50th percentile)50th percentile of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent, which may includeincluding regional and community banks and diversified financial institutions, while maintaining an appropriate alignment with the practices of other FHLBanks.

The Compensation Committee recognized that comparing our compensation practices to a group of other financial services and banking firms that are similar in total assets presents some challenges because of the special nature of our business and our cooperative ownership structure. We believe that the executive roles of our named executive officers are somewhat comparable to those in the comparison group, although the Bank may have a narrower business focus.

Our named executive officers are required to have the same depth of knowledge and experience that is required by comparable financial services and banking firms require, but, unlike some of these comparable companies with multiple lines of business, our lines of business are limited. For example, in certain areas of the Bank our focus is more like that of a specific subsidiary, division, or business unit of comparable financial institutions with multiple lines of business.

For purposes of developing comparative compensation information, the companies with comparable positions were financial services and banking firms with similarsimilarities with regard to business sophistication and complexity. In supporting compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee uses and considers compensation information about the comparable positions at these companies. Each element of compensation may vary somewhat above or below the market median offor the related comparisons.positions in the comparison groups. Furthermore, compensation levels for individual levelspositions may also be adjusted to recognize

201



additional factors, such as regional salary differences, recruitment or retention, special duties or responsibilities, sustained performance results, leadership succession planning, and/orand internal equity considerations.

Since 2014, the Compensation Committee has engaged McLagan Partners, Inc. (McLagan), a leading global management consulting firm providing consulting and benchmarking services for the financial services industry, for the purpose of providing the Compensation Committee with annual competitive market compensation reference and comparative information. During 2017, McLagan also provided advice to the Compensation Committee on amendments to the Bank’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and on director compensation. McLagan does not currently provide any other services to the Bank. In September 2017,2021, McLagan assessed the Bank’s competitive market position with respect to its executive compensation program. McLagan used market data collected from its compensation surveys and publicly available proxy data. McLagan used standardized peer group data from three groups: commercial banks with incumbents located in metro San Francisco and metro New York; metro Federal Home Loan Banks (Atlanta, Chicago, and New York);the other FHLBanks; and public proxy peers with assets between $10 billion and $20 billion. When comparing Bank executives usingwith those at commercial banks, specific job positionsthe closest comparable roles/realistic employment opportunities were used. When comparing Bank executives to executive roles at other Federal Home Loan Banks,FHLBanks, overall functional heads were used. When using the $10 billion to $20 billion peer group a directfor comparison, of top paid executivesactual functional roles or salary rank was made regardless of position.used. The Compensation Committee used the McLagan market data as a reference point for evaluating 20172021 executive compensation levels and to check and compare the reasonableness and appropriateness of the levels of compensation provided to our senior executives.

164

Allocation of Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation and Long-Term Cash Incentive Compensation. Our objective is to compensate our senior executives, including our named executive officers, with a balanced combination of base salary and short- and long-term cash incentive compensation.

We believe that a balanced approach in delivering short- and long-term cash incentive compensation is most appropriate for the Bank because we believe our executives should be focused on achievement of both short- and long-term goals. Consistent with the Bank'sBank’s three-year strategic plans and its Executive Compensation Philosophy, long-term cash incentive compensation helps provide a competitive total cash compensation package and enhances the Bank'sBank’s ability to attract and retain key executives.

The Bank’s short-term cash incentive compensation component of the EIP rewards the named executive officers and other executive officers for the Bank'sBank’s achievement of its annual corporate goals and performance targets and for the officer's achievement of his or her individual goals. The Bank’s long-term cash incentive compensation rewards the named executive officers and other executive officers for the Bank's achievementcomponent of its goals and performance targets over a three-year period.

Beginning in 2017 under the EIP we restructured the traditional long-term cash incentive component of our compensation program to tieties long-term cash incentive rewards to the sustainability of goal achievements over a long-term period, rather than to the achievement of goals over a prospective three-year period. This change was madestructure is designed to promote the Bank’s long-term health by deterring behavior or inappropriate risk-taking that could lead to material financial loss at the Bank. This approach and design for long-term compensation is consistent with developing practices to better recognize risk outcomes in incentive-based compensation decision making and to better balance risk and reward.

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary Compensation

Base salary compensation is a key component of the Bank'sBank’s executive compensation program and helps the Bank successfully attract and retain executive talent. Base salary for the named executive officers is based on a combination of factors, including comparative salary information from industry salary surveys that include the financial institutions in the Bank'sBank’s peer groups. Other factors include the named executive officer's relevant experience and accomplishments and level of responsibility at the Bank and perceived market competition for

202



executives with comparable levels of experience. The Board considers any base salary adjustments for the named executive officers, ateffective as of the beginning of each year, based on the individual's performance and contributions to the Bank'sBank’s achievements or to help more appropriately align total remuneration with comparable positions in the financial services marketplace.

Base salary adjustments for the named executive officers are subject to review and non-objection from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. For the base salaries of the current named executive officers, see the discussion in “Compensation Tables – Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – At Will Employees,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.
Executive Incentive Plan

Beginning with 2017, theThe Board adopted the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP),EIP, which provides for an annual total incentive award (Annual Award) for a one-year performance period.period, beginning with 2017. Fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award is earned and vested after the last day of the one-year performance period (Year-End Award). The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award is deferred for a three-year performance period (Deferred Award). The EIP also provides for a one-time incentive award to address a payment gap in long-term executive incentive compensation in 2020 for the performance period from 2017-2019 (Gap Year Award), which arises because of the discontinuation in 2017 of the Bank’s traditional long-term executive incentive plan. The EIP replaces the Bank’s traditional short-term and long-term executive incentive plans as part of the Bank’s overall compensation program and effectively combines short-term and long-term executive incentive programs into one omnibus incentive plan for all senior executive officers.

The EIP is designed to attract and retain senior executive officers and to motivate and focus their efforts on achieving the Bank’s business plan and accomplishing its goals and objectives while maintaining the safety and soundness of the Bank. The EIP is a cash-based incentive plan that provides award opportunities based on achievement of performance goals and the satisfaction of certain qualifiers. The EIP is for the Bank's senior executive officers (specifically for 2017, the president, executive vice president, and each senior vice president, excluding the Chief Audit Executive, who participates in the Bank's Audit Executive Incentive Plan).
The deferral component of the EIP ties long-term cash incentive rewards to the sustainability of goal achievements over a three-year period, which is intended to, among other things, promote the Bank’s long-term health by deterring behavior or inappropriate risk-taking that could lead to material financial loss to the Bank. Under the Deferred Award provisions of the EIP, payment of fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Award is deferred for a three-year period, during which payment is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain “qualifiers” (discussed
165

below) that recognize the risk outcomes of executive decision making. Deferred Awards may be reduced or subject to forfeiture if qualifiers are not met during the Deferral Performance Period (defined below).

The EIP provides that the Board will establish award levels prior to each of the performance periods for the total Annual AwardsAward, the Year-End Award and the Deferred Awards.Award. A performance period for an Annualthe Year-End Award, is the one-calendar-year period over which fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award can be earned and vested i.e., the Year-End Award, (Annual Performance Period). The related Deferred Award can vest at completion of the following the three-calendar-year performance period (Deferral Performance Period). For the Gap Year Award, the performance period is the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2019 (Gap Year Performance Period).

Performance goals and qualifiers are the factors established by the Board for each performance period and are taken into consideration in determining the amount of an award. TheUnder the EIP for 2021, the Board will define “Threshold,defined “Minimum,” “Meets,” “Exceeds,” and “Far Exceeds”“Maximum” achievement levels for each performance goal to determine the amount of the award. The Board may adjust the performance goals and qualifiers for any performance period to ensure the purposes of the EIP are served. The EIP provides that in determining the appropriate performance goals and qualifiers the Board will, among other things: balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage participants to expose the Bank to imprudent risks; make such a determination in a manner designed to ensure that a participant’s overall compensation is balanced and not excessive in amount and that the awards are consistent with the Bank’s policies regarding compensation arrangements; and monitor the success of the performance goals and qualifiers, taking into account weighting established in prior years and making appropriate adjustments in the future, as needed, so that payments appropriately incentivize participants, appropriately reflect risk, and align with regulatory guidance.


203



Under the EIP for 2017,2021, the Board established 20172021 performance goals for the Annual Award, which, are the:as discussed above, were the Risk Management goal, Franchise Enhancement goal, Community Investment goal, and Organizational Health/Diversity and InclusionDEI goal.

For the 20172021 performance goals, the following table shows the goal weights for different categories of officers.the senior executive officers eligible to participate in the EIP (including the named executive officers and the chief risk officer).
 CEO/EVP/SVPs SVP, Chief Risk Officer
 Corporate Goal Weight
 Goal Weight (includes individual goals)
 Corporate Goal Weight
 Goal Weight (includes individual goals)
IndividualN/A
 10.0% N/A
 10.0%
Risk Management20.0% 18.0% 50.0% 45.0%
Franchise Enhancement40.0% 36.0% 30.0% 27.0%
Community Investment20.0% 18.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Organizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion20.0% 18.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

For the Gap Year Award, executives are rewarded for the achievement of performance goals over a three-year performance period like the Bank’s traditional long-term cash incentive plans (i.e., the Bank’s Executive Performance Unit Plan or EPUP). For the Gap Year Award, the Gap Year Performance Period is from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The Gap Year Award performance goals, which are weighted and measured based on a 3-year average, relate to the (AROCS) and risk management.

The following table shows the performance goals and goal weights for the Gap Year Award.
GoalsGoal Weight
 Threshold
 Meets (Target)
 Exceeds
 Far Exceeds
AROCS Goal (3-Year Average Spread Over Benchmark)30% 2.18% 2.43% 2.68% 2.93%
Risk Management70% Based on the 3-year average of the actual Risk Management goal achievement levels
for 2017, 2018, and 2019

Senior Executive OfficersChief Risk Officer
Corporate Goal WeightGoal Weight (includes individual goals)Corporate Goal WeightGoal Weight (includes individual goals)
IndividualN/A20.0 %N/A20.0 %
Risk Management30.0 %24.0 %50.0 %40.0 %
Franchise Enhancement40.0 %32.0 %25.0 %20.0 %
Community Investment15.0 %12.0 %10.0 %8.0 %
DEI15.0 %12.0 %15.0 %12.0 %
Total100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
For the EIP for 2017,2021, performance goal measures range from 75% of target (threshold)(Minimum) to 150% of target (far exceeds)(Maximum).

The target achievement levels in the EIP for 20172021 were designed to reward senior executive officers for achievement of the Bank'sBank’s corporate goals and objectives as described above, based on a target level of achievement for all corporate goals and the officer's individual goal(s). The exceeds and far exceedsMaximum achievement levels werelevel was designed to reward senior executive officers when the Bank and the individual officer achievements far exceed the target level. The exceedsMaximum achievement level is an optimistic achievement level relative to the target level, and the far exceeds achievement level as the most optimistic achievement level based on reasonable business, market, and economic assumptions and conditions.

The performance goal measures and plan design were intended to appropriately motivate and reward the Bank’s senior executive officers based on the total achievement of all goals, taking into account each senior executive officer’s role in the Bank'sBank’s performance. Setting the performance goal measure ranges based on a percentage of base salary for 20172021 is intended to be consistent with our Executive Compensation Philosophy of deliveringevaluating total cash compensation at target levels generally remunerationaround the median (5050th percentile) percentile of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent.

166

The total incentive awards under the EIP, i.e., the Annual Awards, are determined by multiplying the percentage of achievement for each goal by the respective performance goal weights to arrive at each participating officer's total weighted achievement level. Each participating officer's total weighted achievement level is then used to determine each participating officer's cash incentive compensation award under the EIP.


204



The following table shows the total incentive award opportunitieslevels for the Annual Awards and the allocation of the Annual Award opportunities between the Year-End Awards and the Deferred Awards for 2017.

 
Annual Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 
Year-End Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 
Deferred Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
CEO/EVP/SVPs40%80%96%100% 20%40%48%50% 20%40%48%50%

The following table shows2021 under the total incentive award opportunitiesEIP for the Gap Year Award.eligible senior executive officers.

 Long-Term Incentive Award as a % of Compensation (Base Salary effective February 1, 2017)
PositionThreshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
CEO/EVP/SVPs20%40%48%50%

Total Annual Award as % of Base SalaryYear-End Award as % of Base SalaryDeferred Award as % of Base Salary
TitleMinimumMeetsMaximumMinimumMeetsMaximumMinimumMeetsMaximum
CEO50.0 %80.0 %100.0 %25.0 %40.0 %50.0 %25.0 %40.0 %50.0 %
EVP/SVP40.0 %65.0 %85.0 %20.0 %32.5 %42.5 %20.0 %32.5 %42.5 %
Fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award, i.e., the Year-End Award, will become vested on the last day of the Annual Performance Period (as mentioned above), and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award that is treated as the Deferred Award will become vested on the last day of the Deferral Performance Period, provided that the Board determines that the performance goals for the Annual Award are achieved and the qualifiers for the Annual Performance Period are satisfied;satisfied and, with respect to the Deferred Award only, that the qualifiers for the Deferral Performance Period are satisfied. The Gap Year Award will become vested over a three-year Gap Year Performance Period (i.e., beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2019), to the extent the Board determines the performance goals for the Gap Year Award are achieved and the qualifiers are satisfied.

Vesting of any award is subject to the participant receiving a satisfactory performance rating and being actively employed on the last day of the relevant performance period, except in certain cases, such as termination because of death or disability, retirement, reduction in force, department reorganization, or substantial job modification, or termination for “Good Reason”Good Reason or without “Cause.”Cause, and subject to certain conditions being met. In the case of termination of employment because of death or disability, the EIP provides that a Deferred Award will be treated as fully vested as of the date of termination and the relevant pro rata portion of the Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be treated as vested for that portion of the relevant performance period based on the assumption that the Bank would have achieved the applicable performance goals at the target level and satisfied the qualifiers for the relevant performance period. In all such other such cases of termination of employment (referenced above), and subject to certain conditions being met, the EIP provides that a Deferred Award will be treated as fully vested as of the date of termination of employment and the relevant pro rata portion of the Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be treated as vested for that portion of the relevant performance period to the extent determined by the Board determined that the applicable performance goals are achieved and the qualifiers are satisfied.

If a “Change in Control” (as defined in the EIP) occurs prior to the date of vesting of an award, then an Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be paid on a pro rata basis based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the applicable performance goals at the target level and satisfied the qualifiers for the relevant performance period, while any Deferred Award will be treated as vested effective as of the date of the Change in Control.

The following are the performance qualifiers for 20172021 for any awards under the EIP: (i) no submission of material information to a regulatory or a reporting agency is significantly past due; (ii) the Bank makes sufficient progress, as determined by the Board, in the timely remediation of significant examination, monitoring, and other supervisory findings; (iii) no material risk management deficiency exists at the Bank; (iv) no operational errors or omissions result in material revisions to the financial results, information submitted to the Finance Agency, or data used to determine incentive payouts; and (v) the Bank has sufficient capital to pay dividends and the ability to repurchase or redeem capital stock.

The EIP provides that awards may be reduced, eliminated, or forfeited in certain circumstances. Under the EIP, the Board may reduce or eliminate any award not yet paid if the Board finds that a serious, material safety and

205



soundness issue or a serious, material risk management deficiency exists at the Bank, or if: (i) errors or omissions result in material revisions to the Bank’s financial results, information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting
167

agency, or information used to determine incentive compensation payouts; (ii) information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency is untimely; or, (iii) the Bank does not make appropriate progress, as determined by the Board, in the timely remediation of examination, monitoring, or other supervisory findings and matters requiring attention.

In addition, if the Bank realizes actual losses during the Deferral Performance Period, or other measures or aspects of performance related to the annual Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period are realized that would have caused a reduction in the amount of the final award (i.e., the amount of the earned and vested award that, after any adjustments, is approved by the Board for payment)Annual Award and Deferred Award) calculated for the Annual Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period, then the remaining amount of the final award to be paid at the end of the Deferral Performance Period may be reduced to reflect this additional information. Furthermore, if a participant breaches the terms of a non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreement with the Bank executed as a condition to participating in the EIP, all of the participant’s unpaid vested and unvested awards may be forfeited.

Finally, if during the most recent examination of the Bank by the Finance Agency, the Finance Agency identifies an unsafe or unsound practice or condition that is material to the financial operation of the Bank within the participant’s area(s) of responsibility, and such unsafe or unsound practice or condition is not subsequently resolved to the satisfaction of the Board, then all or a portion of a participant’s unpaid award (vested and unvested) may be forfeited as determined in the sole discretion of the Board. Any future payments for a vested award will cease, and the Bank will have no further obligation to make such payments.

The amount of any award will be determined at the sole discretion of the Board. If the qualifiers are satisfied, an annual compounding interest rate of 6% is applied to any Deferred Awards. Awards, if any, under the EIP are to be paid in accordance with the terms of the EIP following Board approval and completion of any required regulatory review.

The EIP for 2021 also includes a “cap” on the total incentive award payout for any particular year where the sum of the Year-End Award plus the Deferred Award vesting after three years and the interest earned on such Deferred Award does not exceed the senior executive officers’ base salary for that calendar year.
The amount of any earned and vested Annual Award Deferred Award, or Gap YearDeferred Award may be modified at the Board’s discretion to account for performance that is not captured in the relevant performance goals and qualifiers. The Board, in its discretion, may also consider “extraordinary occurrences”“Extraordinary Occurrences” when assessing performance results and determining any of the awards. “Extraordinary Occurrences” mean those events that, in the opinion and discretion of the Board, are outside the significant influence of the participant or the Bank and are likely to have a significant unanticipated effect, whether positive or negative, on the Bank’s operating or financial results.

The EIP for 2021 also provides that the Board may apply a “multiplier” to an individual’s Annual Award to account for individual performance not captured in his or her individual performance goals, positive or negative, but not to result in an award level below Minimum or above Maximum.
For additional information regarding awards granted under the EIP for 2017,2021, see the discussion in “Compensation Tables – Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive PaymentsCompensation and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.

Traditional Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan

The Bank’s traditional long-term cash incentive plan is the Executive Performance Unit Plan (EPUP). For 2017, the 2015 EPUP for the performance period 2015 through 2017 and the 2016 EPUP for the performance period 2016 through 2018 were in effect. For 2018, the 2016 EPUP remains in effect. As discussed above, beginning in 2017, the Bank discontinued offering its traditional long-term executive incentive plan (i.e., the EPUPs) and instead included the long-term cash incentive component of the Bank’s compensation program in the EIP.

The EPUPs were designed to reward our senior executives who are substantially responsible for the Bank's overall long-term performance and who significantly contribute to and influence the Bank's long-term goal achievements, which directly support the Bank's three-year strategic plans. The purpose of the EPUP was also to attract and retain outstanding executives as part of a competitive total compensation program.


206



The EPUP awards are based on the total weighted achievement level of the three-year average achievement levels of two annual Bank corporate goals during the relevant three-year performance period based on a scale of 0% to 150%, with 100% as the target achievement level. The Bank's corporate goals for the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs include the adjusted return on capital spread goal (weighted at 30%) and the Risk Management goal (weighted at 70%).

The 2016 and 2015 EPUPs identified specific adjusted return on capital spread goal targets for each achievement level and provide that the adjusted return on capital spread goal achievement levels will be based on a comparison of the actual three-year average results with the three-year projected results from the Bank's 2016 and 2015 Strategic Plans, respectively. They also provide that the Risk Management goal achievement levels will be based on the three-year average of the actual Risk Management goal achievement levels under each of the three annual executive incentive plans in effect during the performance period, and will be measured at the end of the performance period.

To calculate an EPUP award, the total weighted achievement level for the two Bank corporate goals is multiplied by the officer's target award percentage (the range of awards as a percentage of base salary, discussed below), which is then multiplied by the officer's base salary in the first year of the three-year performance period.

For the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs, total weighted achievement levels range from 75% of target (threshold) to 150% of target (far exceeds), and the awards as a percentage of base salary for the president, executive vice president, and senior vice presidents, based on the total weighted achievement level of Bank goals, are as follows: achievement level 150% of target: 50% of base salary; achievement level 125% of target: 48% of base salary; achievement level 100% of target: 40% of base salary; and achievement level 75% of target: 20% of base salary.

Under the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs, performance below the aggregate threshold achievement level normally will not result in an incentive award. The Board has discretion to modify any and all goal achievement levels, award determinations, and incentive payments to account for matters not specifically addressed in the plan. Under the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs, incentive compensation reductions may be made in, but are not limited to, the following circumstances: (i) if errors or omissions result in material revisions to the Bank's financial results, information submitted to a regulatory or reporting agency, or information used to determine incentive compensation payouts; (ii) if information submitted to a regulatory or reporting agency is untimely; or (iii) if the Bank does not make appropriate progress in the timely remediation of examination, monitoring, or other supervisory findings and matters requiring attention.

The actual achievement of Bank goals for the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs is subject to adjustment for changes in financial strategies or policies, any significant change in Bank membership, and other factors determined by the Board.

The 2016 and 2015 EPUPs provide that the impacts of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges are excluded from the adjusted return on capital spread goal target, but the impacts of actual credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges are included in the adjusted return on capital spread goal performance measurement, and the impacts of dividend benchmark variances-to-plan are excluded from the adjusted return on capital spread goal performance measurement.

The potential target award ranges as a percentage of base salary are intended to be consistent with delivering total compensation packages at target levels generally around the median (50th percentile) of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent.

The awards under the EPUPs are designed to be based in large part on the executive's ability to affect the Bank's long-term performance. For additional information, see discussion in “Compensation Tables – Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.


207



The EPUPs provide that executive officers whose Bank employment is terminated because of voluntary normal retirement, disability, or death may receive a prorated award. In January 2017, the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs were amended to allow a pro rata portion of any award to be paid upon termination of employment during the relevant performance period due to: (a) “Retirement;” (b) a termination by participant for “Good Reason;” (c) a termination by the Bank without “Cause" due to the elimination of an individual job or position; (d) the elimination of one or more jobs or positions as a result of a reduction in force or department reorganization; or (e) a substantial job modification resulting in the incumbent being, in the judgment of the Bank, unqualified for or unable to perform the revised job. A pro rata portion of a plan award may be paid for the portion of the relevant performance period during which the participant was employed to the extent determined by the Board that the applicable performance metrics are satisfied. The amendments also provide that if a participant incurs a termination of employment during a performance period due to death or disability, a plan award will be paid for the portion of the relevant performance period during which the participant was employed based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the “Meets” achievement level for the relevant performance period. The amendments further provide that if a “Change in Control” of the Bank occurs prior to the payment date of a plan award, then a final award will be paid on a prorated basis based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the performance metrics at the “Meets” achievement level for the relevant performance period. The terms “Retirement,” “Good Reason,” “Meets” and “Change in Control” all have the meanings set forth in the EIP.

Except for payments in the case of death, disability or change in control, any awards are paid following Board approval after the end of the three-year performance period and any required regulatory review period.

Savings Plan

The Bank'sBank’s Savings 401(k) Plan (Savings Plan) is a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) retirement benefit plan that is available to all eligible employees, including the named executive officers. Each eligible employee may contribute between 2% and 20%75% of base salary to the Savings Plan. For employees who have completed six months of service, the Bank matches a portion of the employee's contribution (50% for employees with less than three years of service, 75% for employees with at least three years of service but less than five years of service, and 100% for employees following five years of service), up to a maximum of 6% of base salary. Employees are always fully vested in employer matching contributions at all times.

contributions.
For 2017,2021, the maximum annual before-tax employee contribution to the Savings Plan was limited to $18,000$19,500 (or $24,000$26,000 for participants age 50 and over), and nonot more than $270,000$290,000 of an employee’s annual compensation could be taken into account in computing anthe employee's benefits under the Savings Plan.

168

Cash Balance Plan and the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund

WeThe Bank began offering benefits under the Cash Balance Plan on January 1, 1996. The Cash Balance Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that covers employees who have completed a minimum of six months of service, including the named executive officers. Each year, eligible employees accrue benefits equal to 6% of their total annual compensation (which includes base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation) plus interest equal to 6% of their account balances accrued through the prior year, referred to as the annual benefit component of the Cash Balance Plan. For 2017,2021, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) limited the amount of annual compensation that could be considered in calculating an employee's benefits under the Cash Balance Plan to $270,000.

$290,000.
The benefits under the Cash Balance Plan annual benefit component are fully vested after an employee completes three years of service. Vested amounts are generally payable in a lump sum or as an annuity when the employee leaves the Bank.

Prior to offering benefits under the Cash Balance Plan, wethe Bank participated in the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund (FIRF). The FIRF is a multiple-employer tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. WeThe Bank withdrew from the FIRF on December 31, 1995.


208



When wethe Bank withdrew from the FIRF, benefits earned under the FIRF as of December 31, 1995, were fully vested and the value of those benefits was then frozen. As of December 31, 1995, the FIRF calculated each participant's FIRF benefit based on the participant's then-highest three consecutive years' average pay multiplied by the participant's years of service multiplied by 2%, referred to as the frozen FIRF benefit. Upon retirement, participants will be eligible to receive their frozen FIRF benefits.

In addition, to preserve some of the value of the participant's frozen FIRF benefit, we maintainthe Bank maintains the ratio of each participant's frozen FIRF age 65 annuity to the participant's highest three consecutive years' average pay as of December 31, 1995 (annuity ratio), which we referthe Bank refers to as the net transition benefit component of the Cash Balance Plan. Upon retirement, each participant with a frozen FIRF benefit will receive a net transition benefit under the Cash Balance Plan that equals his or her highest three consecutive years' average pay at retirement multiplied by his or her annuity ratio minus the frozen FIRF benefit.

Benefit Equalization Plan

The Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP) is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified plan that is designed to restore retirement benefits lost under the Savings Plan and Cash Balance Plan because of compensation and benefits limitations imposed on the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan under the IRC.

Annual compensation is determined based on the definition of compensation provided in the respective tax-qualified plans. Participation in the BEP is available to all employees, including the named executive officers, whose benefits under the tax-qualified plans are restricted because of the IRC limitations discussed above.

An employee's benefits that would have been credited under the Cash Balance Plan but for the limitations imposed on the plan under the IRC are credited as Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits under the BEP and the credits accrue interest at an annual rate of 6% until distributed. Each year, employees may also elect to defer compensation earned over the IRC compensation limits to the BEP. For each year that a participant makes deferrals to the BEP, if the amount of the Bank'sBank’s matching contribution to a participant's account under the Savings Plan is limited because of the IRC compensation limitations, then the Bank will credit to the participant's BEP account an amount equal to the lost matching contribution (up to a maximum of 6% of base salary in the aggregate) under the Savings Plan (participant deferrals and Bank matching contributions are referred to herein as Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits). The make-up benefits under the BEP vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan.

Effective January 1, 2005, in response to IRC Section 409A, wethe Bank froze the then-existing BEP (now referred to as the Original BEP) and implemented a new BEP conforming to IRC Section 409A and applicable notices and
169

regulations, which changed the participant election process relating to the time and form of benefit payments (referred to herein as the New BEP).

Under the New BEP, a participant's Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits are payable in the form of a lump sum, single life annuity, 50% survivor annuity, or 75% survivor annuity upon termination of employment, a set date or age after termination of employment, becoming disabled after termination of employment, or death. Under the New BEP, a participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits are payable in a lump sum or two to ten annual installments, and payments may commence at termination of employment, retirement, disability, death, or a specific date after termination of employment. For participants and former participants in the SERP (including the named executive officers), Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits may be payable in equal installments for a period of ten years, or a lump sum payment of one-half of the account balance with the remaining half paid pursuant to a schedule of equal annual installment payments for a period of ten years. In addition, a participant's elections with respect to the time and form of benefit payments are irrevocable unless the election is made 12 months prior to the scheduled distribution date and the new scheduled distribution date is delayed at least five years. If a participant does not elect the time or form of payment, his or her distribution will be a lump sum at termination of employment.

Under the Original BEP, a participant's Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits are paid in a single life annuity commencing at the later of age 65 or termination of employment, unless the participant elects an optional time and form of payment. The optional forms of payment are a lump sum or any other optional form then permitted under the Cash Balance Plan. Under the Original BEP, a participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits are payable in a

209



lump sum or two to ten installments upon retirement, termination of employment, death, or a specific date after termination of employment. Also, a participant can change the time and form of payment for the Supplemental Cash Balance Benefit at any time, but if the election provides for payment prior to age 65, then payment will not be made until 12 months after the date the Bank receives the new written election unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment. Similarly, a participant may elect at any time to change the payout schedule of one or more of the participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefit accounts, provided that no payments will be made according to the new election until 12 months after the date the Bank receives the new written election, unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment.

Participants arePrior to 2020, participants were permitted to make up to five separate payout elections (a payout date and form of payment) with respect to the Supplemental BEP Savings Benefit under the Original BEP and under the New BEP. Beginning in 2020, participants are permitted each calendar year to elect a different time and form of distribution for deferrals made in that calendar year.

Notwithstanding a participant’s election of a form of payment, the Bank may instead, in its sole discretion, pay a participant’s entire account balance in a single lump sum payment, so long as the participant’s account balance is less than the applicable dollar limit under IRC Section 402(g), which in 2021 is $19,500.Such payment is known as a limited cashout and applies to a participant’s Supplemental Cash Balance Benefit and Supplemental BEP Savings Benefit, including excess contributions and matching contributions.
Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP) is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan, consisting of three components for employees: (1) employee deferral of current compensation; (2) make-up matching contributions that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the base salary compensation not been deferred; and (3) make-up pensionretirement benefits that would have been earned under the Cash Balance Plan had any amount of total annual compensation (base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation) not been deferred. See discussion in “Compensation Tables – Narrative to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.”

ThePrior to 2020, the DCP iswas available only to all officers of the Bank, including the named executive officers. Beginning in 2020, the DCP was made available to all Bank employees. Directors are also able to defer their director fees under the DCP. The make-up benefits for employee participants under the DCP vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan.

170

Effective January 1, 2005, in response to IRC Section 409A, wethe Bank froze the then-existing DCP (now referred to as the Original DCP) and implemented a new DCP, conforming to IRC Section 409A, which changed the participant election process related to the time and form of benefit payments (referred to herein as the New DCP).

Under the New DCP, participants' make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits are payable in the form of a lump sum, single life annuity, 50% survivor annuity, or 75% survivor annuity upon termination of employment, a set date or age after termination of employment, becoming disabled after termination of employment, or death. If a participant does not elect a time or form of payment, the benefit is paid in a lump sum upon termination of employment. However, if the participant elects to receive his or her distribution at death and survives to the later of age 70½ or termination of employment, the benefit is paid upon the later of the two events in the form of a lump sum. Only a single time and form of distribution may be elected with respect to both the make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits under the New DCP and the make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits under the New BEP.

A participant's deferred compensation and the Bank'sBank’s make-up Savings Plan matching contributions credited under the New DCP (including earnings on such amounts) are payable in a lump sum or two to ten annual installments, and payments may commence at termination of employment, retirement, disability, death, or a specific date no earlier than one year from the end of the deferral period. Participant elections with respect to the time and form of Savings Plan-related benefit payments from the New DCP are irrevocable unless the election is made 12 months prior to the scheduled distribution date and the new scheduled distribution date is delayed at least five years. If a participant does not elect the time or form of payment, his or her distribution will be a lump sum at termination of employment.

For participant-deferred compensation and make-up Bank matching contributions credited under the Original DCP, a participant may elect at any time to change the payout schedule of one or more of the participant's accounts, provided that no payments will be made according to the new election until 12 months after the date the Bank

210



receives the new written election, unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment.

Participants arePrior to 2020, participants were permitted to make up to five separate payout elections (a payout date and form of payment) under each of the New DCP and the Original DCP for distribution of participant deferrals and Bank matching contribution credits. Beginning in 2020, participants are permitted each calendar year to elect a different time and form of distribution for deferrals made in that calendar year.

Notwithstanding a participant’s election of a form of payment, the Bank may instead, in its sole discretion, pay a participant’s entire account balance in a single lump sum payment, so long as the participant’s account balance is less than the applicable dollar limit under IRC Section 402(g), which in 2021 is $19,500.Such payment is known as a limited cashout and applies to a participant’s make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits, including participant deferrals and the Bank’s contributions.
Under the Original DCP, participants' make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits are payable in the same form and at the same time as the participants' related benefits under the Cash Balance Plan.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Effective January 1, 2003, wethe Bank began providing a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) to the Bank'sBank’s eligible senior executive officers, including the named executive officers.officers (other than Mr. Amato). This plan is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified retirement benefit plan that provides a cash balance stylebalance-style benefit to the Bank'sBank’s senior executive officers (including the named executive officers) that is in addition to the tax-qualified benefits under the Cash Balance Plan.

The SERP supplements the Cash Balance Plan benefits to provide a competitive postretirement compensation package that is intended to help the Bank attract and retain key senior executive officers who are critical to the success of the Bank.

171

Benefits under the SERP are based on total annual compensation (base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation, including any deferrals under the Savings Plan, BEP, or DCP) and years of credited service as presented in the table below. In addition, participantsbelow for years prior to 2018.
Years of Credited Service
(As Defined in the Plan)
Amount of Contribution for President (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)Amount of Contribution for Other Participants (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
Fewer than 1010 %%
10 or more but less than 1515 %12 %
15 or more20 %16 %
Participants accrue annual interest equal to 6% of balances accrued through the prior yearend. In addition, SERP benefits are limited to the extent that any participant's total pension retirement income exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the participant's final average pay. Final average pay is defined as a participant's highest average annual compensation during any three consecutive years during which he or she is a participant in the SERP. Annual benefits accrued under the SERP for any plan year that commenced before January 1, 2018, vest at the earlier of three years after they are earned, five years of employment with the Bank from the date the senior executive officer became a participant in the SERP, or when the participant reaches age 62.

Years of Credited Service
(As Defined in the Plan)
Amount of Contribution for President (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
 Amount of Contribution for Other Participants (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
Fewer than 1010% 8%
10 or more but less than 1515% 12%
15 or more20% 16%

The normal form and time of payment of benefits under the SERP is a lump sum upon the earlier of termination of employment, disability, or death. Upon a timely election, a participant may elect optional forms of payment to commence after termination of employment as specified in the plan.

No benefits are paid under the SERP ifIf a participant's employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the plan). In January 2018, the SERP was amended to provide that in the event of termination for cause,, only the unvested portion of the participant’s SERP account would be forfeited.

The SERP was also amended in January 2018 to, revise: (1)among other things, revise Schedule A to the SERP to provide that beginning with 2018, the amounts of the contribution (Contribution Credit) to be credited to the account of a participant covered by Schedule A to the SERP will be 20% of a participant’s total annual compensation for fewer than five years of credited service (Credited Service) and 25% of a participant’s total annual compensation for five years or more of Credited Service; and (2)Service. The SERP was further amended in 2021 to add Schedule CD to the SERP to provide that beginning with 2018, the amounts of the Contribution Credit to be credited to the account of a participant in Schedule CD will be 25% of a participant’s total annual compensation for fewer than five years of Credited Service and 35% of a participant’s total annual compensation for five years or more of Credited Service. Annual benefits accrued under the SERP for any plan year

211



commencing after January 1, 2018, will vest at the earlier of five years of employment with the Bank from the date the senior executive officer became a participant in the SERP, or when the participant reaches age 62. The Bank’s eligible senior executive officers, including the named executive officers, are participants in Schedule A and the president and chief executive officer is a participant in Schedule C. AtD. See the same time, the SERP was also amended to provide the Board with discretionary authority for approving special contribution credits (Special Contribution Credits), which are additional credits to a participant’s account in an amount that may not exceed the participant’s target annualized compensation plus target Deferred Award and Gap Year Award under the EIP and any other long-term incentive compensation (the “pay limitation”) for the applicable calendar year. At any time, no more than three Special Contribution Credits may be approved for a single participant, and the pay limitation for each participant is adjusted annually for annual increases in the participant’s target compensation and long-term incentive pay. The Special Contribution Credits are not subject to the SERP’s total retirement income limitation described above.table below.

Years of Credited Service
(As Defined in the Plan)
Amount of Contribution for Former President (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)Amount of Contribution for Other Participants (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
Fewer than 525 %20 %
5 or more35 %25 %
Other Elements of Compensation

We provideThe Bank provides to all employees, including the named executive officers, health, dental, and vision insurance and an employee assistance program for the employees and their spouses/partners and children, for which we paythe Bank pays approximately 80% of the premiums and the employee pays approximately 20%. In addition, we providethe Bank provides long-term disability and basic life insurance coverage to all employees at no cost to the employees.

172

The Bank makes available limited retiree health carehealthcare benefits for eligible employees who retire from the Bank. To be classified as a Bank retiree eligible to enroll for retiree health carehealthcare benefits, a Bank employee must be 55 years of age with a minimum of 10 years of Bank service on the date that his or her employment with the Bank terminates.

Perquisites

On occasion, the Bank may pay for resort activities for employees, including our named executive officers, in connection with business-related meetings; and in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses/partners accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The president and chief executive officer receives use of a designated building parking space. Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid to the provider of the perquisites.

212173



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (Compensation Committee) acts as the compensation committee on behalf of the Bank's Board of Directors.Bank’s Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Based on the Compensation Committee's review of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the discussions the Compensation Committee has had with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual report on Form 10-K, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Compensation and Human Resources Committee
John T. Wasley,Scott C. Syphax, Chair
Bradley W. Beal,Matthew Hendricksen, Vice Chair
Banafsheh Akhlaghi
Marangal Domingo
Melinda Guzman
Joan C. Opp
Scott C. Syphax

213174



COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table
(In whole dollars)
Name and Principal PositionYearSalaryBonus
Non-Equity
Incentive
Compensation(1)
Non-Equity
LTIP Payout(2)
Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation(3)
All Other(4)(5)
Compensation
Total
Teresa Bazemore(6)
2021$696,023 $100,000 (7)$662,500 $— $205,378 $160,950 (8)$1,824,851 
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Stephen P. Traynor(9)
2021401,147 568,082 (10)321,658 — 499,426 500,827 (11)2,291,140 
Former Acting President2020470,000 — 487,746 — 344,850 39,439 1,342,035 
and Chief Executive Officer2019453,404 — 221,250 200,700 382,894 38,211 1,296,459 
Joseph Amato(12)
2021319,178 175,000 (13)260,600 — 96,122 31,590 882,490 
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth C. Miller(14)
202191,042 — 48,917 — 14,175 661 154,795 
Former Executive Vice2020495,000 — 522,715 — 466,648 24,504 1,508,867 
President and Chief2019494,714 — 238,500 231,000 432,414 37,228 1,433,856 
Chief Financial Officer
Elena Andreadakis(15)
2021495,000 35,400 (16)432,967 — 255,559 42,095 1,261,021 
Former Executive Vice2020470,000 — 490,425 — 370,918 41,180 1,372,523 
President and Chief2019452,500 — 221,250 188,500 338,259 47,249 1,247,758 
Administrative Officer
Greg Ward(17)
2021460,000 — 421,983 — 270,113 27,789 1,179,885 
Executive Vice President2020415,000 100,000 (18)427,218 — 486,728 35,372 1,464,318 
and Chief Risk Officer
Tony Wong(19)
2021373,309 253,700 (20)— 118,726 27,309 773,044 
Executive Vice President
and Chief Banking Officer
(1)The amounts for 2021 reflect the total Annual Awards under the EIP for 2021 for services performed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. The amounts for 2020 reflect the total Annual Awards under the EIP for 2020 for services performed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Awards are earned and vested after the last day of the one-year performance period, i.e., the Year-End Award. The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Awards are deferred for a three-year performance period, i.e., the Deferred Award. Any payout of the Deferred Awards under the EIP for 2021 is subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements and qualifiers, and completion of regulatory review. The amounts for 2021 and 2020 also reflect interest for the vested Deferred Awards under the EIP for 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the total Annual Award for 2021 under the EIP for 2021, see the discussion in “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Compensation and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts.”
(2)The amounts for 2019 represent the GAP Year Awards under the EIP for 2017. For a discussion of the Gap Year Awards included for 2019 under the EIP for 2017, see “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan” in Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the “Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards” table in the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(3)Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each of the named executive officers' accumulated benefits under the Bank’s qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans (Cash Balance Plan; [frozen FIRF, if applicable]; restored benefits under the Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP); make-up retirement benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP); and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan). There are no above-market or preferential earnings on the named executive officers' DCP accounts.
(4)Includes perquisites and premiums for disability and life insurance paid by the Bank. On occasion, the Bank pays for resort activities for employees in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings; and, in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid to the provider of the perquisites. The value of some perquisites is not reasonably quantifiable but is known to be de minimis.
(5)Includes the Bank’s matching contributions under the Savings Plan and the Bank’s restored and make-up matching amounts credited under the BEP and DCP.
(6)Ms. Bazemore became president and chief executive officer effective March 15, 2021.
(7)Represents payment of a sign-on payment in accordance with Ms. Bazemore’s employment agreement.
175
Summary Compensation Table
             
(In whole dollars)            
Name and Principal PositionYear Salary
 
Bonus (1)

Non-Equity
Incentive
Payment(2)

Non-Equity
LTIP Payout(3)

Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation(4)

 
All Other(5)(6)
Compensation

 Total
J. Gregory Seibly(7)
2017 $850,000
 $300,000
$418,900
$217,800
$590,814
 $29,149
 $2,406,663
President and2016 506,665
 
297,600
99,100
335,768
 447,105
(8) 
1,686,238
Chief Executive Officer            
             
Lisa B. MacMillen(9)
2017 188,541
(10) 

67,150
197,900

(11) 
567,813
(12) 
1,021,404
Executive Vice President and2016 557,200
 
275,200
262,800
193,400
 39,893
 1,328,493
Chief Operating Officer2015 546,300
 22,763
270,100
256,300
49,211
 40,295
 1,184,969
            

Kenneth C. Miller2017 466,533
 
229,900
214,900
293,857
 37,017
 1,242,207
Senior Vice President and2016 458,100
 
227,200
214,000
236,083
 37,239
 1,172,622
Chief Financial Officer2015 444,800
 18,533
219,900
208,600
202,885
 35,534
 1,130,252
            

Lawrence H. Parks2017 484,605
(13) 

227,850
213,000
322,988
 34,047
 1,282,490
Senior Vice President,2016 478,009
(14) 

225,200
212,100
169,090
 33,601
 1,118,000
External and Legislative Affairs2015 461,376
(15) 
18,367
217,900
206,800
184,575
 32,703
 1,121,721
            

Suzanne Titus-Johnson2017 454,337
(16) 

204,250
190,900
382,333
 33,063
 1,264,883
Senior Vice President and2016 422,653
(17) 

201,900
190,100
233,358
 33,092
 1,081,103
General Counsel and2015 395,100
 116,463
195,300
185,300
122,730
 31,914
 1,046,807
Corporate Secretary            
            

Stephen P. Traynor(18)
2017 419,292
 
199,700
190,400
255,726
 32,952
 1,098,070
Senior Vice President and           

Chief Banking Officer           


(1)The amount for Mr. Seibly in 2017 represents payment of a sign-on bonus in accordance with his employment agreement. The amounts in 2015 represent a Board-approved special award, consisting of an amount equal to one additional semi-monthly paycheck for all Bank employees to recognize Bankwide teamwork and its contribution to the Bank’s exceptional overall performance in 2015. In addition, the amount for Ms. Titus-Johnson in 2015 represents a $100,000 discretionary cash incentive compensation award under the 2015 EIP.
(2)Represents the Year-End Awards in 2017 earned and vested under the EIP for 2017, awards in 2016 earned under the 2016 President’s Incentive Plan and 2016 Executive Incentive Plan, and awards earned in 2015 under the 2015 Executive Incentive Plan. For the Year-End Awards in 2017 under the EIP for 2017, see the discussion in “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts.”
(3)Represents awards earned under the 2015, 2014, and 2013 EPUPs. For the awards in 2017 under the 2015 EPUP, see the discussion in “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts.”
(4)Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each of the named executive officers' accumulated benefits under the Bank's qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans (Cash Balance Plan; frozen FIRF, if applicable; restored pension benefit under the Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP); make-up pension benefit under the Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP); and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)). There are no above-market or preferential earnings on the named executive officers' DCP accounts.
(5)Includes perquisites and premiums for disability and life insurance paid by the Bank. On occasion, the Bank pays for resort activities for employees in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings; and, in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid to the provider of the perquisites. The value of some perquisites is not reasonably quantifiable, but is known to be de minimis.
(6)Includes the Bank’s matching contributions under the Savings Plan and the Bank’s restored and make-up matching amounts credited under the BEP and DCP.
(7)Mr. Seibly became president and chief executive officer effective May 12, 2016.
(8)Of this amount, $224,791 represents reimbursement of relocation costs to Mr. Seibly, and $217,135 represents the related tax gross-ups to Mr. Seibly.
(9)Ms. MacMillen served as chief operating officer until March 31, 2017.
(10)Of this amount, $49,241 represents a vacation cash-out payment.

214



(11)In accordance with SEC rules, negative changes in pension value are not included in this table. The negative change in pension value for Ms. MacMillen is $188,233 which primarily results from payments from the BEP, DCP and the SERP.
(12)Of this amount, $557,200 represents a severance payment.
(13)Of this amount, $22,264 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(14)Of this amount, $24,009 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(15)Of this amount, $20,576 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(16)Of this amount, $39,912 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(17)Of this amount, $15,653 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(18)Mr. Traynor who previously served as Senior Vice President, Member Financial Services and Community Investment, became Chief Banking Officer in March 2017.

(8)Of this amount, $112,903 represents reimbursement of relocation costs to Ms. Bazemore.
(9)Mr. Traynor served as acting president and chief executive officer until March 14, 2021, and retired from the Bank effective October 1, 2021.
Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
            
(In whole dollars)      
Estimated Payout Ranges(1)
NameEIP for 2017 Plan Period Payout Date Threshold
 Target
 Maximum
J. Gregory Seibly

Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 $170,000
 $340,000
 $425,000
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 170,000
 340,000
 425,000
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 170,000
 340,000
 425,000
Lisa B. MacMillen(2)
Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 27,478
 54,957
 68,696
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 27,478
 54,957
 68,696
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 9,159
 18,319
 22,899
Kenneth C. MillerYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
Lawrence H. ParksYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
Suzanne Titus-JohnsonYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
Stephen P. TraynorYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 81,180
 162,360
 202,950
 Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 81,180
 162,360
 202,950
 Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 81,180
 162,360
 202,950
(10)Represents payment of a special award of $568,082 for serving as acting president and chief executive officer.

(11)Of this amount, $470,000 represents payment of a severance payment.
(1)The estimated payouts for the 2017 Year-End Awards represent 50% of the Annual Award under the EIP for 2017 that could have been earned by the respective executive officers for 2017. Actual amounts of the Year-End Awards earned and vested under the EIP for 2017 are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Estimated payouts for the Deferred Awards represent 50% of the Annual Award under the EIP for 2017 that could be vested by the respective executive officers at the end of the three-year deferral performance period. Estimated payouts for the Gap Year Award under the EIP are what could be earned at the end of the three-year performance period and are calculated using the base salaries in effect at the beginning of the three-year performance period. Any Gap Year Award is subject to the achievement of performance goals and satisfaction of certain qualifiers, and any Deferred Award under the EIP is subject to the satisfaction of certain qualifiers. Both of the Deferred Award and Gap Year Award are payable following the completion of regulatory review. See discussion in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan.”
(2)Year-End Awards, Deferred Awards, and Gap Year Awards, if any, for Ms. MacMillen are prorated.

(12)Mr. Amato became the interim chief financial officer effective January 5, 2021, and the chief financial officer effective May 13, 2021.
(13)Represents a payment of a special award in recognition of his service as interim chief financial officer.
(14)Mr. Miller retired from the Bank as chief financial officer effective January 4, 2021.
(15)Ms. Andreadakis retired from the Bank as chief administrative officer effective January 3, 2022.
(16)Represents a discretionary 2021 performance award.
(17)Mr. Ward, who previously served as chief audit executive, became chief risk officer in May 2019.
(18)This amount represents a discretionary cash incentive compensation award.
(19)Mr. Wong, who previously served as chief marketing officer and acting chief banking officer, was appointed chief banking officer in May 2021.
(20)In addition to the Annual Award under the EIP for 2021 prorated, the amount includes a prorated award earned by Mr. Wong in the amount of $42,600 under the Bank’s Team Member Incentive Plan earned prior to Mr. Wong becoming eligible for the EIP for 2021 in May 2021.
Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
(In whole dollars)
Estimated Payout Ranges(1)
NameEIP for 2021Plan PeriodPayout DateThresholdTargetMaximum
Teresa BazemoreYear-End Award2021February 2022$175,000 $280,000 $350,000 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 2025175,000 280,000 350,000 
Stephen P. TraynorYear-End Award2021February 202270,550 114,650 149,950 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 202570,550 114,650 149,950 
Joseph AmatoYear-End Award2021February 202263,850 103,750 135,650 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 202563,850 103,750 135,650 
Kenneth C. MillerYear-End Award2021February 20221,100 1,750 2,300 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 20251,100 1,750 2,300 
Elena AndreadakisYear-End Award2021February 202299,000 160,900 210,400 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 202599,000 160,900 210,400 
Greg WardYear-End Award2021February 202292,000 149,500 195,500 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 202592,000 149,500 195,500 
Tony WongYear-End Award2021February 202254,350 88,350 115,550 
Deferred Award2022-2024February 202554,350 88,350 115,550 
(1)The estimated payouts for the Year-End Award and the Deferred Award each represent 50% of the total Annual Awards under the EIP for 2021 that could have been earned by the respective executive officers for 2021, which has been prorated based on the executive officer’s period of eligibility to participate in the EIP during 2021. Actual amounts of both the Year-End Award and Deferred Award under the EIP for 2021 for each named executive officer are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Any payout of the Deferred Awards under the EIP for 2021 is subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements and qualifiers, and completion of regulatory review. See the discussion in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan.”
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table

At Will Employees

All employees of the Bank are “at will” employees, including the named executive officers. The named executive officers may resign at any time, and the Bank may terminate their employment at any time, for any reason or no reason, with or without cause and with or without notice.

The 20172021 annual base salaries as of December 31, 2017,2021, for the current2021 named executive officers who served as of December 31, 2021, were as follows: J. Gregory Seibly, $850,000;Teresa Bryce Bazemore, $875,000; Stephen P. Traynor (retired), $470,000; Kenneth C. Miller $467,300; Lawrence H. Parks, $463,100; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $415,100;(retired), $495,000; Joseph Amato, $500,000; Elena Andreadakis (retired), $495,000; Greg Ward, $460,000; and Stephen P. Traynor, $423,151. For 2018, the base salaries of the current named executive officers areTony Wong, $405,000.

215



as follows: J. Gregory Seibly, $900,000; Kenneth C. Miller, $481,319; Lawrence H. Parks, $476,993; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $427,553; and Stephen P. Traynor, $435,846.

Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy. The Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy (Senior Officers' Policy) is applicable to the president, executive vice president,presidents (other than Mr. Amato), and any senior vice presidents.president as of December 31, 2018, who are defined in the Senior Officers’ Policy as “Corporate Senior Officer.” The Senior
176

Officers' Policy provides severance benefits in the event that the employee's employment is terminated because the employee's job or position is eliminated or because the job or position is substantially modified so that the employee is no longer qualified or cannot perform the revised job. For these officers, severance under the Senior Officers' Policy is equal to the greater of (i) 12 weeks of the officer's base salary, or (ii) the sum of three weeks of the officer's base salary, plus three weeks of the officer's base salary for each full year of service and three weeks of base salary prorated for each partial year of service at the Bank to a maximum of 52 weeks of base salary. The Senior Officers' Policy also provides one month of continued health and life insurance benefits and, at the Bank'sBank’s discretion, outplacement assistance.

The Senior Officers' Policy provides that in the event a senior vice presidentCorporate Senior Officer is involuntarily terminated without “Cause” under certain circumstances or voluntarily terminated with “Good Reason” (as defined by the Senior Officers' Policy) in connection with a Change in Control, upon the Bank'sBank’s timely receipt of a separation agreement and release, these executive officers will receive severance pay in a lump sum equal to one year of base salary.

In addition, under the Senior Officers' Policy, in the event of a qualifying termination in connection with a Change in Control, each senior vice presidentCorporate Senior Officer will be entitled to continued health and life insurance coverage under the Bank'sBank’s group health and life insurance policies, at the Bank'sBank’s expense, for a period of 12 months immediately following the effective date of separation. However, the Bank will immediately cease paying such premiums prior to the end of the 12-month period if the executive officer accepts employment with another employer that provides comparable benefits in terms of cost and scope of coverage during the 12-month period. If the Bank is not in compliance with any applicable regulatory capital or regulatory leverage requirement or if any of the payments required to be made to senior vice presidentsa Corporate Senior Officer pursuant to the Senior Officers' Policy would cause the Bank to fall below such applicable regulatory requirements, such payment will be delayed until the Bank achieves compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.

The Senior Officers' Policy also provides that, in the event the former executive vice president experienced a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control, severance and benefits would have been payable pursuant to a Change in Control Severance Agreement, described below.

The Board believes that the level of severance benefits for each named executive officer who is a Senior Corporate Officer under the Senior Officers’ Policy is appropriate because it is reasonable to believe that finding a comparable position at another institution at a comparable compensation level could take up to one year, and possibly longer, depending on the economic environment at the time, and that the distraction of this uncertainty may have a detrimental impact on the executive's performance. If the employment of any of the current2021 named executive officers who are eligible under the Senior Officers’ Policy currently serving had been terminated on December 31, 2017,2021, because the employee's job or position had been eliminated or because the job or position had been substantially modified so that the employee was no longer qualified or could not perform the revised job, the approximate value of the severance benefits payable to the executive (subject to Finance Agency regulatory review) applying the Senior Officers’ Policy would have been as follows: J. Gregory Seibly, $199,273; Kenneth C. Miller, $470,465; Lawrence H. Parks, $464,242; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $418,255;Greg Ward, $243,433; and Stephen P. Traynor, $426,289.Tony Wong, $405,310.

Employment Agreements and Arrangements
Change in Control Agreement.Bazemore Employment Agreement. The Board had approved a Change in Control Severance Agreement for the former executive vice president and chief operating officer, Lisa B. MacMillen. This agreement provided for a severance payment and continued benefits if the executive terminated her employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in the agreement) in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined in the agreement) of the Bank. In particular, she would have been entitled to receive, in lieu of any severance benefits to which the executive may otherwise be entitled under any severance plan or program of the Bank, the following: (i) the executive's fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination (together with all other amounts and benefits to which the executive was entitled under any benefit plan or practice of the Bank other than the Bank's Senior Officers' Policy); (ii) severance

216



pay in an amount equal to the sum of two times the executive's annual base salary plus two times the executive's “Annual Incentive Amounts” (as defined in the agreement); (iii) continued health and life insurance coverage for up to 180 days after the first anniversary of the date of termination of the executive's employment (or if earlier, the date the executive accepts employment from an employer with comparable benefits); and (iv) executive-level outplacement services at the Bank's expense, not to exceed $25,000.

Employment Agreement. In April 2016, the Bank entered into an employment agreement with Mr. SeiblyTeresa Bryce Bazemore dated February 19, 2021, with an initial term of three years and one-year terms thereafter, unless terminated at any time by either the Bank or Mr. Seibly.Ms. Bazemore. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. SeiblyMs. Bazemore will initially receivedreceive a base annual salary of $800,000$875,000 and a sign-on payment of $600,000 to$100,000 paid in the following installments: $50,000 shall be received in two equal installments withinpaid 30 days from the start of eachher employment, and $50,000 shall be paid six months from the start of the first and second anniversaries of Mr. Seibly’sher employment, start date, andwhich installments are subject to clawbackclawbacks in certain circumstances. The base annual salary is subject to review at the Board’s discretion.
The employment agreement provides for a severance payment equal to (i) two times his “Base Salary”her Salary (as defined in hisher employment agreement); and (ii) two times his “Annualher Annual Incentive Amounts”Amounts (as defined in hisher employment agreement) and continued benefits if Mr. Seibly’sMs. Bazemore’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a “ChangeChange in Control”Control (as defined in hisher employment agreement) of the Bank. Had Mr. Seibly’ sMs. Bazemore’s employment been terminated in connection with a Change in Control on December 31, 2017,2021, the approximate value of the benefits payable to Ms. Bazemore would have been $2,145,439, excluding amounts of any outplacement services, payable to Mr. Seibly would have been $2,561,241.services.

177

Mr. Seibly isMs. Bazemore will also be eligible to participate in the Bank’s various executive incentive and employee benefit plans, including the Bank’s SERP, 2016 President’sExecutive Incentive Plan (EIP) and the 2014-2016, 2015-2017, and 2016-2018 EPUPs.Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). Under Mr. Seibly’sMs. Bazemore’s employment agreement, the years of credited service and the amount of Bank annual contribution credits under the SERP prior to its amendment effective January 2018, werewill be as follows: 10%25% of total annual compensation for less than 45 years of credited service; 15%service and 35% of total annual compensation for 4 or more years but less than 9 years of credited service; and 20% of total annual compensation for 95 or more years of credited service. In addition, Mr. Seibly’sUnder Ms. Bazemore’s employment agreement, provides that hethe Bank will receive a supplemental SERP contribution credit in the amount of $600,000, to be credited in three equal installments over two years, with the first installment credited at the time his employment began and the second and third installments credited on the first and second anniversaries of his employment commencement, respectively. These supplemental SERP contribution credits will vest immediately when credited. Mr. Seibly’s employment agreement also provides forprovide reimbursement of hisher relocation costcosts up to $250,000 and payment to the appropriate taxing authorities of up to $220,000 of any relocation tax obligations.

$250,000.
The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Seibly’sMs. Bazemore’s employment is terminated due to the expiration of the initial three-year term and the Board decidesdecided not to extend hisher employment for any additional term, Mr. Seibly shallMs. Bazemore would be entitled to all Accrued Benefits (as defined in her employment agreement) and to receive a severance payment equal to twelve (12) months of base salary and a pro-rata portion of the president’s incentive planEIP award for the year in which the termination occurs; and, all Deferred Awards will be treated as fully vested (Severance Payment).
The employment agreement further provides that if Ms. Bazemore was terminated without Cause (as defined in her employment agreement) or if she terminated her employment for Good Reason (as defined in her employment agreement) at any time, Ms. Bazemore would be entitled to receive severance payments equal to the Severance Payment and all Accrued Benefits. Had Ms. Bazemore been terminated under these circumstances on December 31, 2021, the approximate value of the benefits, payable to Ms. Bazemore, excluding amounts of any Accrued Benefits, would have been $205,489.
Amato Employment Agreement. The Bank entered into an employment agreement with Joseph Amato dated October 7, 2020, for an initial term of six (6) months (Initial Term) and six (6) automatic extensions of one-month terms thereafter (each referred to as an Automatic One Month Extension Term). Mr. SeiblyAmato’s employment agreement provided that Mr. Amato receive a base annual salary of $500,000 and a sign-on payment of $50,000, which is subject to a repayment if Mr. Amato’s employment is terminated without “Cause”for Cause or Without Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment agreement. Additionally, Mr. Amato’s employment agreement provided that he would be eligible for a fully discretionary Special Award of up to $300,000 to be received in two parts in recognition of his service as Interim CFO and based on his performance in connection with his duties and responsibilities as the Bank’s principal financial officer. The first 50% of the Special Award ($150,000) shall be paid at the end of the Initial Term and eligibility for up to the second 50% of the Special Award ($150,000) shall accrue on a pro rata basis over the course of any subsequent Automatic One Month Extension Term.
The employment agreement also provided that Mr. Amato acknowledges and agrees that notwithstanding any terms to the contrary in the Bank’s Executive Incentive Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, and Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy, such plans and policy would not apply to him in connection with his employment under the employment contract; and the Special Award is in lieu of any and all payments or rights that might otherwise have been available to him under such plans and policy.
On July 7, 2021, the Bank entered into an amendment to Mr. Amato’s employment agreement (Amendment No. 1) to extend the term of his employment to March 31, 2023, and, effective May 13, 2021, to serve as the Bank’s chief financial officer (CFO) for the extended term (Second Term). In connection with the extension of Mr. Amato’s term of employment, Mr. Amato served for one Automatic One Month Extension Term. Amendment No. 1 provides an option to mutually elect to extend his Second Term for another year, until March 31, 2024 (Mutual Extension).
Amendment No. 1 provides that Mr. Amato will be eligible for a second special award of up to $354,835 in recognition of his service as the Bank’s CFO (Second Special Award). Unless Mr. Amato is terminated for Cause or resigns without Good Reason prior to March 31, 2022, he will be eligible for up to the first 50% of the Second Special Award ($177,418), which shall accrue and, if approved by the Bank’s President and Chief Executive Officer, will be paid as soon as administratively practicable following March 31, 2022. Eligibility for up to the second 50% of the Second Special Award ($177,417) shall accrue and, if approved by the Bank’s President and Chief Executive Officer, will be paid as soon as administratively practicable following March 31, 2023, unless Mr. Amato is terminated for Cause or resigns without Good Reason prior to such date.
178

Beginning with the Second Term, i.e., May 13, 2021, Mr. Amato will also be eligible to participate in the Bank’s Executive Incentive Plan (EIP). For the Second Term, Mr. Amato continues to acknowledge that the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy will not apply to him during the Second Term or any Mutual Extension.
Amendment No. 1 also provides that, upon the expiration of the Second Term or any Mutual Extension, Mr. Amato shall be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the EIP Annual Award (defined in the EIP to include both the short-term incentive component and the long-term incentive component) as set forth in the Bank’s EIP, which will be treated as vested, on a pro rata basis for the performance period of the year when the expiration of his employment agreement occurs, and any Deferred Awards (as defined in the EIP) will be treated as fully vested, all of which is to be paid out as and when due in accordance with the EIP (Severance Payment).
If Mr. Amato’s employment is terminated at any time by the Bank without Cause or if he terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in his employment agreement) any time during the initial three-year term,Good Reason, then Mr. SeiblyAmato shall be entitled to receive severance paymentsan amount equal to:to his remaining salary, as well as all Accrued Benefits. In addition, Mr. Amato will be entitled to any earned but unpaid amount of the fully discretionary Second Special Award on a pro rata basis for the period up to the date the termination occurs and shall be entitled to receive the Severance Payment; all “Accrued Benefits” (as defined in his employment agreement); and all unpaid sign-on benefits.Payment. Had Mr. SeiblyAmato been terminated his employment under these circumstances on December 31, 2017,2021, the approximate value of the benefits, payable to Mr. Seibly,Amato, excluding amounts of any Accrued Benefits, would have been $1,568,900. In$120,169.
Traynor Special Award Memorandum. Beginning March 1, 2020, Stephen P. Traynor, who was serving as the eventBank’s executive vice president and chief banking officer, became the Bank’s acting president and chief executive officer. Pursuant to the compensation arrangement relating to Mr. Seibly receivesTraynor’s service as acting president and chief executive officer, Mr. Traynor would accrue a special award at a rate of $45,833.33 per month (in addition to his base salary), beginning March 1, 2020, and continuing through the last business day prior to the date on which a permanent chief executive officer commences employment at the Bank (the CEO Employment Date). The accrual amount would be pro-rated for any severance benefits underpartial month of service by Mr. Traynor as acting president and chief executive officer. Mr. Traynor would receive the Senior Officers’ Policy, any severance paymentsspecial award in two equal installments: the first as soon as administratively feasible following the CEO Employment Date and the second as soon as administratively feasible following the 60th calendar day following the CEO Employment Date. To be eligible to receive the award, Mr. Traynor must have continued his service as the acting president and chief executive officer through the CEO Employment Date, for the first installment, and continued his employment with the Bank through the 60th calendar day following the CEO Employment Date, for the second installment, except in certain termination events as follows: in a performance-based termination, termination for “cause,” or a voluntary termination, all unpaid portions of the special award would be forfeited; and in an involuntary termination (other than a performance-based termination or for “cause”), death, or long-term disability, all accrued and unpaid portions of the special award would be payable toas soon as administratively feasible. On February 23, 2021, the Bank announced the appointment of Teresa Bryce Bazemore as the Bank’s president and chief executive officer, effective March 15, 2021, and Mr. Seibly under his employment agreement shall be reduced by such severance benefits received under the Senior Officers’ Policy.

Traynor was paid a special award of $568,082.
Non-Equity Incentive PaymentsCompensation and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts

For 2017, J. Gregory Seibly,2021, Ms. Bazemore, as president and chief executive officer, was awarded a Year-Endan Annual Award under the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP)EIP of $418,900. Mr. Seibly’s$662,500 (prorated based upon Ms. Bazemore’s EIP eligibility date). Ms. Bazemore’s award was based on the Bank's 2017Bank’s 2021 overall achievement level of: 138%of 139.5%, which comprised the following achievement levels for the Bank’s four corporate goals: 145% for the Risk Management goal; 144%136.8% for the Franchise Enhancement goal; 150.0%150% for the Community Investment goal; and 125% for the Organizational Health/Diversity and InclusionDEI goal, and his 2017along with her 2021 achievement level for hisher individual goal.

217



Based on the achievement levels for the Bank'sBank’s four corporate goals and the achievement levels of the other 2021 named executive officers for their respective individual goals, the following Year-EndAnnual Awards under the EIP for 20172021 were made: Lisa B. MacMillen, $67,150 (prorated from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2017);awarded: Stephen Traynor (retired), $281,000; Joseph Amato, $260,600; Kenneth C. Miller $229,900; Lawrence H. Parks, $227,850; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $204,250;(retired), $4,200; Elena Andreadakis (retired), $394,200; Greg Ward, $391,000; and Stephen P.Tony Wong, $211,100. The awards for Messrs. Traynor $199,700.and Miller were prorated based on their respective retirement dates. The awards for Messrs. Amato and Wong were prorated based on their respective EIP eligibility dates.

179

The total Annual Award for each named executive officer represents the amount for their Year-End award amounts above reflectAward and the amount for their Deferred Award, each of which is fifty percent (50%) of the totaltheir Annual AwardsAward approved by the Board under the EIP for 2017.2021. The payment of the other fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Award, i.e., thetheir Deferred Award is deferred for the three-year performance period and is subject to applicable requirements and qualifiers as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.

The following table shows the two components of the total Annual Awards for the named executive officers approved by the Board under the EIP for 2017.2021.

(In whole dollars)EIP for 2021
Named Executive Officers
Year-End Awards(1)
Deferred Awards(2)
Annual Awards
Teresa Bazemore$331,250 $331,250 $662,500 
Stephen P. Traynor (retired)140,500 140,500 281,000 
Joseph Amato130,300 130,300 260,600 
Kenneth C. Miller (retired)2,100 2,100 4,200 
Elena Andreadakis (retired)197,100 197,100 394,200 
Greg Ward195,500 195,500 391,000 
Tony Wong(3)
105,550 105,550 211,100 
Total$2,204,600 
(1)The Year-End Award is 50 percent of the total Annual Award and is included in the Summary Compensation Table. The awards for Ms. Bazemore and Messrs. Amato and Wong were prorated based on their respective EIP eligibility dates. The awards for Messrs. Traynor and Miller were prorated based on their respective retirement dates.
 EIP for 2017
Named Executive Officers
Yearend Awards(1)

 
Deferred Awards(2)

 Annual Awards
J. Gregory Seibly$418,900
 $418,900
 $837,800
Lisa B. MacMillen(3)
67,150
 67,150
 134,300
Kenneth C. Miller229,900
 229,900
 459,800
Lawrence H. Parks227,850
 227,850
 455,700
Suzanne Titus-Johnson204,250
 204,250
 408,500
Stephen P. Traynor199,700
 199,700
 399,400
Total    $2,695,500
(2)The Deferred Award is 50 percent of the total Annual Award and remains subject to the satisfaction of applicable qualifiers and will not be paid until 2025. The Deferred Awards are also subject to modification and forfeiture under the terms of the EIP. The awards for Ms. Bazemore and Messrs. Amato and Wong were prorated based on their respective EIP eligibility dates. The awards for Messrs. Traynor and Miller were prorated based on their respective retirement dates.

(1)The Year-End Award is 50 percent of the Annual Award and included in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)The Deferred Award is 50 percent of the Annual Award and remain subject to the satisfaction of applicable qualifiers and will not be paid until 2021. The Deferred Awards are also subject to modification and forfeiture under the terms of the EIP.
(3)Ms. MacMillen’s awards are prorated.

(3)In addition to the Annual Award under the EIP for 2021 prorated, Mr. Wong received a prorated award of $42,600 under the Bank’s Team Member Incentive Plan earned prior to Mr. Wong becoming eligible for the EIP for 2021 in May 2021.
In reviewing the Bank's 2017Bank’s 2021 performance, the Board recognized the acting president’s leadership and the other named executive officers' management in addressing risk management, business, financial, operational efficiency, and regulatory challenges and issues, while achieving all performance goals and objectives at a very high level. With respect to Mr. Seiblylevel and during a period of a global pandemic. The Board recognized Ms. Bazemore’s achievements and her efforts, in particular, the Board recognized the president’s achievements with respect to his effortsleading through a significant leadership transition, creating and implementing a hybrid work program in connection with enhancing constituent relations, the commitment to safe and sound practices, financial management practices, and employee engagement. Last, the Board acknowledged the president’s efforts in creating a Bank culture committed to operational and financial efficiency and effectiveness.

The Risk Management goal, which consistedanticipation of two goal components (technology resiliency and business continuity/crisis management), was measured at an aggregate achievement level of 138%. In determining the level of achievement for the first component, the Board recognized management's accomplishments and achievements in migrating the Bank’s environment to the new data centersRTO, and efforts in rolling outensuring the Bank’s end-user computing modernization initiativestability and accessibility for members during continued capital markets uncertainty. Additionally, Ms. Bazemore engaged the Bank’s workforce through a period of extended remote work and in a saferesponse to external environmental factors, such as community and sound manner. school closures and social justice issues.
With respect to the second goal component, achievement was based on management enhancing the Bank’s recovery resilience by further maturing the Bank’s enterprise crisis management framework through increased crisis team member preparedness, along with continued integration of Information Services Disaster Recovery and Information Security incident response protocols to ensure a cohesive recovery. In particular, the Board recognized the Bank’s level of achievement through completion of crisis management team exercises and cyber response team exercises.

The Bank's Franchise Enhancement goal, which consisted of three goal components, was measured at an aggregate achievement level of 144%.the credit and collateral risk management goal component of the Risk Management goal, management successfully developed enhancements to the risk management framework to better manage and mitigate the risks associated with expanded eligible collateral types. Management also successfully designed and developed a new depository member credit model to improve model accuracy and predictability of failures. The Board recognizedBank’s insurance company member credit and collateral framework was also enhanced and expanded. Management also implemented a new platform for the Bank'scredit risk rating process, including workflows and approvals, for members and counterparties.
With respect to the achievement level of the operational risk management goal component of the Risk Management goal, management successfully implemented revisions to the Bank’s operational risk management and IT risk management frameworks to introduce enhanced policies and procedures, more formalized governance structures, and improved risk monitoring. Management also completed risk assessments and taxonomy realignments for key Bank programs and surpassed its Operational Risk Assessment plan objectives. Other achievements under this goal
180

resulted in an assessment of the Bank’s Data Management Maturity Model and identification of related enhancement opportunities.
To support the achievement level of the LIBOR transition goal component of the Risk Management goal, management successfully implemented the ability to adjust collateral margin and valuation adjustments for LIBOR collateral. Management also enhanced the Bank’s financial performanceforecasting process to assess the impact of LIBOR fallback provision alternatives on projected earnings. Other achievements under this goal resulted in 2017 forManagement assessing the Bank’s LIBOR derivatives position and implementing the approved strategy to mitigate exposure.
To support the achievement level of the financial performance goal component (which excludedof the impact of other-than-temporary impairment charges, litigation settlements gains, and contributions made in connection withFranchise Enhancement goal, the Bank’s Quality Jobs Initiative), andfull year AROC spread was 3.88.
To support the

218



achievements relating to the Bank’s operating cost efficiency and the member business goal components. With respect to the financial performance goal component, the adjusted return on capital spread goal target achievement level for 2017 was 3.06% and the Bank achieved a spread of 3.95% (net of adjustments). For the operating cost efficiency goal component of the Bank took several organizational actions to reduce run-rateFranchise Enhancement goal, full year operating expenses and improve organizational and operational efficiency, including significant restructuring of the Bank’s leadership team and reporting structurewere $147 million.
With respect to broaden leadership span-of-control and sharpen role clarity. Regarding the member business goal component of the Board notedFranchise Enhancement goal, which measured how well the Bank maintained and increased the volume of advances and letters of credit outstanding to members, the Bank’s achievements in slowing the paceaverage daily balance for advances and letters of advances runoff as well as increasing the usecredit for 2021 was $28.1 billion and $16.1 billion, respectively, for a total of Bank credit$44.2 billion.
With respect to help offset maturing advances to large and former members; and the Bank’s implementation of a program to elevate and expand the level of contact with members and prospective members, which has helped promote the Bank as a valued business partner.

The Board further noted the Bank's strong performance on its Community Investment goal, which was measured at an achievement level of 150.0% for 2017. The Bank far exceeded the Community Investment goal, focused on the number of members using the CIP and ACE Program or participating in the AHEAD Program.

The Organizational Health and Diversity/Inclusion goal was measured at an achievement level of 125%. The Board notedthat used the Bank’s achievements in workforce and supplier diversity training and the development and implementation of a supplier program, and successfully planning and holding diversity events and activities during 2017.community investment products far exceeded 2021 goal targets.

For the 2015 EPUP, covering the three-year period 2015 through 2017, long-term cash incentive compensation awardsWith respect to the named executive officers were based on the achievement levelsDEI goal, management met certain deliverables in creating additional opportunities to increase spend with suppliers from underrepresented communities, increasing employee volunteerism related to financial literacy in minority or underrepresented communities, and developing a strategic plan for the Bank's adjusted return on capital spread goal and Risk Management goal overBank to address the three-year performance period from 2015 through 2017. The overall achievement level for the goals over this period was 147%, reflecting the effectBlack homeownership gap.














181


The awards approved by the Board under the 2015 EPUP were as follows: J. Gregory Seibly, $217,800 (prorated); Lisa B. MacMillen, $197,900 (prorated); Kenneth C. Miller, $214,900; Lawrence H. Parks, $213,000; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $190,900; and Stephen P. Traynor, $190,400.

Pension Benefits Table

The following table provides the present value of accumulated pensionretirement and pension-related benefits payable as of December 31, 2017,2021, to each of the named executive officers upon the normal retirement age of 65 under the Bank'sBank’s qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans.

(In whole dollars)
NamePlan NameYears of
Credited
Service
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(1)
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
Teresa BazemoreCash Balance Plan0.250 $12,801 $— 
Financial Institutions Retirement FundN/A— — 
Benefit Equalization Plan0.250 1,604 — 
Deferred Compensation Plan0.250 — — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
0.750 190,973 — 
Stephen P. Traynor (retired)Cash Balance Plan26.000 793,803 — 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund0.250 5,876 — 
Benefit Equalization Plan26.000 322,681 (31,347)
Deferred Compensation Plan26.000 288,889 — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
18.750 — (2,580,466)
Joseph AmatoCash Balance Plan0.667 17,573 — 
Financial Institutions Retirement FundN/A— — 
Benefit Equalization Plan0.667 5,325 — 
Deferred Compensation Plan0.667 — — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(3)
N/A— — 
Kenneth C. Miller (retired)Cash Balance Plan25.917 — (775,987)
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund0.917 — (25,949)
Benefit Equalization Plan25.917 — (592,158)
Deferred Compensation Plan25.917 — (27,713)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
18.000 — (2,443,173)
Elena Andreadakis (retired)Cash Balance Plan10.083 250,656 — 
Financial Institutions Retirement FundN/A— — 
Benefit Equalization Plan10.083 220,128 — 
Deferred Compensation Plan10.083 53,062 — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
10.583 1,321,070 — 
Greg WardCash Balance Plan7.667 233,763 — 
Financial Institutions Retirement FundN/A— — 
Benefit Equalization Plan7.667 150,241 — 
Deferred Compensation Plan7.667 — — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
5.000 1,027,029 — 
Tony WongCash Balance Plan26.250 880,661 — 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund0.250 2,289 — 
Benefit Equalization Plan26.250 116,419 — 
Deferred Compensation Plan26.250 20,459 — 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
0.667 95,216 — 

(1)For purposes of this table, the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2021 (measured December 31, 2021) was calculated using a discount rate of 2.25%, which is consistent with the assumptions used in the Bank’s financial statements. Actual benefit payments under each plan may
219
182



differ based on the applicable discount rate under the terms of the relevant plan. The Bank withdrew from the FIRF, a multiple-employer tax-qualified defined benefit plan, on December 31, 1995. Prior to the Bank withdrawing from the FIRF, the following named executive officers were participants in the plan: Mr. Traynor, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Wong. Amounts under the BEP and the DCP represent the present value of only the pension-related benefits accumulated for the named executive officer.

(2)For the purposes of this table, the years of credited service for the SERP represent the years of participation since the inception of the SERP in 2003 or the first year in which the participant initially became active in the SERP. For purposes of determining the amount of Bank contribution in the SERP table, the years of credited service are defined in the SERP.
(In whole dollars)       
NamePlan Name 
Years of
Credited
Service

 
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(1)

 
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

J. Gregory Seibly

Cash Balance Plan 1.083
 $26,660
 $
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 1.083
 93,654
 
 Deferred Compensation Plan 1.083
 
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 1.583
 806,268
 
        
Lisa B. MacMillen(3)
Cash Balance Plan 30.667
 713,941
 
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.417
 143,256
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 30.667
 
 642,885
 Deferred Compensation Plan 30.667
 775,067
 136,823
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 14.250
 
 871,249
        
Kenneth C. MillerCash Balance Plan 22.917
 600,318
 
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 0.917
 26,244
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 22.917
 434,932
 
 Deferred Compensation Plan 22.917
 22,315
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,507,771
 
        
Lawrence H. ParksCash Balance Plan 20.333
 630,000
 
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 20.333
 535,462
 
 Deferred Compensation Plan 20.333
 127,836
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,695,835
 
        
Suzanne Titus-JohnsonCash Balance Plan 31.333
 918,724
 
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.333
 150,373
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 31.333
 890,021
 
 Deferred Compensation Plan 31.333
 150,200
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.750
 1,162,157
 
        
Stephen P. TraynorCash Balance Plan 22.250
 610,143
 
 Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 0.250
 5,412
 
 Benefit Equalization Plan 22.250
 238,107
 
 Deferred Compensation Plan 22.250
 161,619
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,524,867
 

(1)For purposes of this table, the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2017 (measured December 31, 2017) was calculated using a discount rate of 3.25%, which is consistent with the assumptions used in the Bank's financial statements. Actual benefit payments under each plan may differ based on the applicable discount rate under the terms of the relevant plan. The Bank withdrew from the FIRF, a multiple-employer tax-qualified defined benefit plan, on December 31, 1995. Amounts under the BEP and the DCP represent the present value of only the pension-related benefits accumulated for the named executive officer.
(2)For the purposes of this table, the years of credited service for the SERP represent the years of participation since the inception of the SERP in 2003 or the first year in which the participant initially became active in the SERP. For purposes of determining the amount of Bank contribution in the SERP table, the years of credited service are defined in the SERP.
(3)Ms. MacMillen served as chief operating officer until March 31, 2017.


220



(3)In accordance with Mr. Amato’s employment agreement, the SERP will not apply to him while he is employed under his employment agreement.
Narrative to Pension Benefits Table

For information regarding the plans in the table, see the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Cash Balance Plan and the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund,” “Benefit Equalization Plan,” “Deferred Compensation Plan,” and “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.” The valuation method and material assumptions used in quantifying the present value of the current accrued benefits in the table are consistent with the assumptions used in the Bank'sBank’s financial statements. See the discussion in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1612 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans.”

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table reflects the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan balances as of December 31, 2017,2021, for the named executive officers.

(In whole dollars)
Name and Principal PositionLast Fiscal YearBeginning of
Year Balance
2021 Executive Contributions(1)
2021 Bank
Contributions(2)
Aggregate
Earnings/
(Losses)
Aggregate
(Withdrawals)/
Distributions
Yearend 2021
Aggregate Balance(3)
Teresa Bazemore2021$— $— $— $— $— $— 
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Stephen P. Traynor20214,248,518 656,572 12,419 295,733 (299,236)4,914,006 
Former Acting President and
Chief Executive Officer
Joseph Amato2021— — — — — — 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth C. Miller2021— — — — — — 
Former Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial
Officer
Elena Andreadakis2021736,569 201,600 12,096 96,063 — 1,046,328 
Former Executive Vice
President and Chief
Administrative Officer
Greg Ward2021— — — — — — 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
Tony Wong2021— — — — — — 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Banking Officer
183
(In whole dollars)             
Name and Principal PositionLast Fiscal Year 
Beginning of
Year Balance

 
2017 Executive Contributions(1)

 
2017 Bank
Contributions(2)

 
Aggregate
Earnings/
(Losses)
in 2017

 
Aggregate
(Withdrawals)/
Distributions
in 2017

 
Yearend 2017
Aggregate Balance(3)

J. Gregory Seibly

2017 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
President and             
Chief Executive Officer             
              
Lisa B. MacMillen2017 5,762,930
 515,037
 
 920,785
 
 7,198,752
Executive Vice President and             
Chief Operating Officer             
              
Kenneth C. Miller2017 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Vice President and             
Chief Financial Officer             
              
Lawrence H. Parks2017 560,029
 102,000
 6,120
 417


 668,566
Senior Vice President,             
External and Legislative Affairs             
              
Suzanne Titus-Johnson2017 132,590
 216,190
 
 52,147
 
 400,927
Senior Vice President and             
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary             
              
Stephen P. Traynor2017 2,291,417
 479,700
 7,200
 279,631
 (87,321) 2,970,627
Senior Vice President and             
Chief Banking Officer             

(1)The 2017 executive contributions made by Ms. MacMillen and Ms. Titus-Johnson are included in the "Non-Equity Incentive Payment" and "Non-Equity LTIP Payout" columns in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT); the 2017 executive contributions made by Mr. Parks are included in the "Salary" column for 2017 in the SCT; and the 2017 executive contributions for Mr. Traynor include $120,000 reported in the “Salary” column for 2017 in the SCT.
(2)Represents make-up Bank matching contributions lost under the Savings Plan as a result of deferring compensation. The 2017 Bank contribution made to Mr. Parks and Mr. Traynor are included in the “All Other Compensation" column for 2017 in the SCT.
(3)The yearend 2017 aggregate balance for Mr. Parks includes $96,000 and $90,000 reported in the "Salary" Column for 2016 and 2015 in the SCT, respectively, and includes $5,760 and $5,400 reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for 2016 and 2015 in the SCT, respectively. The yearend 2017 aggregate balance for Ms. Titus-Johnson includes $120,000 in the "Salary" column for 2016 in the SCT, and includes $7,200 reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for 2016 in the SCT. The yearend 2017 aggregate balance for Ms. MacMillen includes $260,000 and $244,666 reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Payment” and “Non-Equity LTIP Payout” columns, respectively, for 2016 in the SCT.


221



(1)The 2021 executive contributions made by Ms. Andreadakis are included in the "Salary" column in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT); and the 2021 executive contributions for Mr. Traynor are included in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Payment” columns in the SCT.
(2)Represents make-up Bank matching contributions lost under the Savings Plan as a result of deferring compensation. The 2021 Bank contributions made to Ms. Andreadakis and Mr. Traynor are included in the “All Other Compensation" column for 2021 in the SCT.
(3)The yearend aggregate balance for Ms. Andreadakis includes $201,600 reported in the "Salary" column for 2021 in the SCT and includes $12,096 reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for 2021 in the SCT. The yearend 2021 aggregate balance for Mr. Traynor includes $206,980 reported in the "Salary" column for 2021 in the SCT and includes $12,419 reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for 2021 in the SCT.
Narrative to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table presents information about our Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP),DCP, which is designed to allow Bank officers to defer up to 100% of base salary and short- and long-term incentive cash compensation awards, as applicable. Directors may also participate in the DCP to defer up to 100% of their director fees.

In addition, since one of the factors involved in determining benefits under the Bank's Savings Plan is an officer's annual base salary compensation, this table also presents make-up matching contributions that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the annual base salary compensation not been deferred.

The Bank'sBank’s matching contribution under the Savings Plan is calculated based on the basis of an officer's base salary after deferring base salary compensation under the DCP. As a result, an officer who defers base salary compensation forgoes the Bank'sBank’s matching contribution on the portion of compensation that is deferred. To compensate for this, the Bank makes a contribution credit to the officer's DCP balance to restore the benefit under the Savings Plan that would otherwise be lost as a result of deferring base salary compensation.

compensation, and these “make up matching contributions” are also reflected in the table.
Participants may direct the investments of deferred amounts into core mutual funds or into a brokerage account. Participants may change these investment directions at any time. All investment earnings accumulate to the benefit of the participants on a tax-deferred basis. Brokerage fees relating to purchases and sales are charged against the value of the participant's deferred balance in the plan. The Bank pays all set-up and annual account administration fees.

Income taxes are deferred until a participant receives payment of funds from the plan. Participants may elect payouts in a lump sum or over a payout period from 2 to 10 years. A participant may change any previously elected payment schedule by submitting a written election. Any written election to change the payment schedule must be made at least 12 months prior to the original payout date, and the new payout date, in most cases, must be at least 5 years from the original payout date.




222
184



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, the ratio of the Bank’s chief executive officer’s total compensation for 20172021 to the Bank’s median of the annual total compensation for 20172021 of all our employees, except the chief executive officer (Median Employee) is 12.86:1.9.76:1. For total compensation for the Bank’s chief executive officer and the Median Employee, wethe Bank used the same elements of compensation presented in the Summary Compensation Table and calculated total compensation in the same manner total compensation is calculated for the Summary Compensation Table for both employees, which includes among other things,employees. The calculation also included amounts attributable to the change in pension value, which will vary among employees based upon their tenure at the Bank. For 2017,2021, the total annualized compensation of the Median Employee was $187,108,$227,182, and the total annualized compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Total Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table,chief executive officer was $2,406,663.$2,217,809.

WeThe Bank identified the Median Employee by calculating the 20172021 total compensation (using the same elements of compensation in the Summary Compensation Table and in the same manner total compensation is calculated for the Summary Compensation Table) for each of the employees who were employed by the Bank on December 31, 2017,2021 and ranking the 20172021 total compensation for all such employees (a list of 285296 employees) from lowest to highest, excluding the chief executive officer. The employees in the calculation included all full-time and part-time employees, and wethe Bank annualized compensation for all such employees.

For 2021, the Bank had two non-concurrent principal executive officers. As previously disclosed, Mr. Traynor served as the Bank’s executive vice president, chief business officer until he began serving as the Bank’s acting president and chief executive officer in 2020. Mr. Traynor served as the acting president and chief executive officer until the Bank appointed Ms. Bazemore as the Bank’s president and chief executive officer, effective March 15, 2021. Since Mr. Traynor received payment of a special award above his normal compensation for his service as acting president and chief executive officer and Ms. Bazemore became the Bank’s president and chief executive officer effective in the first quarter 2021, the Bank has elected to use Ms. Bazemore’s annualized 2021 total compensation for the chief executive officer pay ratio disclosure, rather than to combine the 2021 total compensation of the two principal executive officers who served in 2021.

223
185



DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We provide our directors with compensation for the performance of their duties as members of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and for the amount of time spent on the Bank’s business.

Director Compensation Table
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
  
(In whole dollars) 
Name of Directors serving during 2017Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash

Douglas H. (Tad) Lowrey(1)
$125,000
Melinda Guzman(2)
120,000
Bradley W. Beal105,000
Craig G. Blunden95,000
Steven R. Gardner(3)
95,000
Richard A. Heldebrant(4)
105,000
Simone Lagomarsino110,000
John F. Luikart105,000
Kevin Murray110,000
Robert F. Nielsen95,000
Brian M. Riley105,000
John F. Robinson105,000
F. Daniel Siciliano95,000
Scott C. Syphax105,000
John T. Wasley105,000
Total$1,580,000

Director Compensation Table
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
(1)Mr. Lowrey served as Chair during 2017. Mr. Lowrey’s term as director expired December 31, 2017.
(In whole dollars)
(2)Name of Directors serving during 2021Ms. Guzman served as Vice Chair during 2017.Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
F. Daniel Siciliano(1)(2)
$140,000 
Simone Lagomarsino(3)
Mr. Gardner’s term as director expired December 31, 2017.
135,000 
(4)Jeffrey K. BallMr. Heldebrant resigned as director from the Board effective December 31, 2017, upon his retirement from Star One Credit Union.120,000 
Marangal L. Domingo(2)
120,000 
Melinda Guzman120,000 
Lori Gay115,000 
Matthew Hendricksen115,000 
John F. Luikart(2)(4)
120,000 
Shruti Miyashiro115,000 
Kevin Murray120,000 
Joan C. Opp(2)
125,000 
Brian M. Riley(2)
117,917 
Scott C. Syphax120,000 
Virginia A. Varela120,000 
John T. Wasley(2)(4)
115,000 
Total$1,817,917 

(1)Mr. Siciliano served as Chair during 2021 and is serving as Vice Chair for 2022.
(2)The Bank offers a matching gift program to all employees and directors whereby the Bank will match charitable donations to eligible nonprofits up to $1,000. For the year ended 2021, the Bank made $1,000 matching contributions on behalf of directors Domingo, Luikart, Opp, Riley, Siciliano, and Wasley.
(3)Ms. Lagomarsino served as Vice Chair during 2021 and is serving as Chair for 2022.
(4)Messrs. Luikart and Wasley’s terms as directors expired on December 31, 2021.
On occasion, the Bank pays for resort activities for directors in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings, and, in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses accompanying directors to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The value of these perquisites areis considered de minimis and not included in the table above.

The Boardboard of Directorsdirectors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy for 2017 (20172021 (2021 Directors Compensation Policy) provided the directors with compensation for the performance of their duties as members of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and the amount of time spent on official Bank business, as set forth below.




224186



(In whole dollars)     (In whole dollars)
Position
Maximum Annual
Service Fee

 
Maximum Annual
 Meeting Fees

 
Total
Maximum Annual
Compensation

PositionMaximum Annual
Service Fee
Maximum Annual
 Meeting Fees
Total
Maximum Annual
Compensation
Chair$77,500
 $47,500
 $125,000
Chair$90,000 $50,000 $140,000 
Vice Chair72,500
 47,500
 120,000
Vice Chair85,000 50,000 135,000 
Audit and Risk Committee Chairs62,500
 47,500
 110,000
Audit and Risk Committee Chairs75,000 50,000 125,000 
All Other Committee Chairs57,500
 47,500
 105,000
All Other Committee Chairs70,000 50,000 120,000 
Directors on Audit Committee52,500
 47,500
 100,000
Other Directors47,500
 47,500
 95,000
Other Directors65,000 50,000 115,000 
Under the 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy, service fees for the above positions were paid for serving as a director during and between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board. The maximum annual service fee was prorated and paid with the meeting fee, if applicable, at the conclusion of each two-month service period on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (monthend February, April, June, August, October, and December). In addition, each director received a fee of $9,500$10,000 for attending any portion of five of the six regularly scheduled two-day Board meetings, subject to the annual maximum of $47,500.

$50,000.
The 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy provided that a director could receive a meeting fee for participation in one regularly scheduled Board meeting by telephone. No other fee was paid for participation in meetings of the Board or committees by telephone or participation in other Bank or FHLBank System activities. The president of the Bank was authorized to interpret the 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy, as necessary, according to applicable statutory, regulatory, and policy limits.

Under the 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy, the final prorated service fee was to be withheld if a director did not attend at least 75% of all regular and special meetings of the Board and the director's assigned committees for the year, or if the Board determined a director had consistently demonstrated a lack of engagement and participation in meetings attended. In addition, the meeting fee attendance requirement provided that a director would receive a meeting fee only if he or she attended the regular Board meeting, as well as at least one assigned committee meeting during the Board's regularly scheduled two-day meetings.

Under the 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy, the Bank reimbursed directors for necessary and reasonable travel, subsistence, and other related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their official duties, which may have included participation in meetings or activities for which no fee was paid.

For expense reimbursement purposes, directors' official duties included:
Meetings of the Board and Board committees,
Meetings requested by the Finance Agency and FHLBank System committees,
Meetings of the Council of FHLBanks and its committees,
Meetings of the Bank'sBank’s Affordable Housing Advisory Council,
Events attended on behalf of the Bank when requested by the president in consultation with the chair,
Other events attended on behalf of the Bank with the prior approval of the chair,
Director education events attended with the prior approval of the chair, and
National Association of Corporate Directors Annual Meeting.

The 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy also provides that directors may receive up to an additional $1,500 in compensation in the form of expense reimbursement for meals and travel for a spouse or significant other.

The 2021 Directors Compensation Policy also provides that directors are provided the opportunity to participate in the Bank’s Charitable Contribution Matching Gift Program.
The Board adopted a Boardboard of Directorsdirectors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy for 2018,2022, which is substantially similar to the 20172021 Directors Compensation Policy, except that themeeting fees increased to $11,000 and maximum total service fees were increased by $10,000 for all director positions on the Board, including Board Chair and Vice Chair, all committee chairs, and all other directors, such that the total maximum compensation for 2018 was increased by $10,000 for all

2022 are as provided in the table below.
225
187



(In whole dollars)
PositionMaximum Annual
Service Fee
Maximum Annual
 Meeting Fees
Total
Maximum Annual
Compensation
Chair$95,000 $55,000 $150,000 
Vice Chair81,500 55,000 136,500 
Audit, Compensation and HR Committee, and Risk Committee Chairs77,500 55,000 132,500 
All Other Committee Chairs75,000 55,000 130,000 
Other Directors68,000 55,000 123,000 

directors. Director fees were increased to more closely align with relevant market benchmarks for director compensation and trends at other FHLBanks.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information about those stockholders that are beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of February 28, 2018.2022.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Charles Schwab Bank4,050,000
 10.8%
2360 Corporate Circle   
Henderson, NV 89074   
    
MUFG Union Bank, NA3,240,000
 8.7
400 California Street   
San Francisco, CA 94104   
    
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
3,068,088
 8.2
1111 Polaris Parkway   
Columbus, OH 43240   
    
First Republic Bank2,848,500
 7.6
111 Pine Street   
San Francisco, CA 94111   
    
Bank of the West2,331,550
 6.2
180 Montgomery Street   
San Francisco, CA 94104   
Total15,538,138
 41.5%

(1)Nonmember institution.

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares Held
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
First Republic Bank1,150,991 5.5 %
111 Pine Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
MUFG Union Bank, National Association1,133,750 5.4 
445 South Figueroa Street, 9th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Total2,284,741 10.9 %
The following table sets forth information about those members (or their holding companies) with officers or directors serving as directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco as of February 28, 2018.2022.

Director NameName of InstitutionCityStateNumber of
Shares Held
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
Jeffrey K. BallFriendly Hills BankWhittierCA9,931 — %
Marangal (Marito) DomingoFirst Technology Federal Credit UnionSan JoseCA576,630 2.7 
Matthew HendricksenEmployers Insurance Company of NevadaRenoNV3,781 — 
Matthew HendricksenEmployers Assurance CompanyRenoNV13,104 0.1 
Matthew HendricksenEmployers Compensation Insurance CompanyRenoNV17,795 0.1 
Matthew HendricksenEmployers Preferred Insurance CompanyRenoNV21,753 0.1 
Simone LagomarsinoLuther Burbank SavingsSanta RosaCA226,346 1.1 
Shruti MiyashiroOrange County's Credit UnionSanta AnaCA85,700 0.4 
Joan C. OppStanford Federal Credit UnionPalo AltoCA150,000 0.7 
Brian M. RileyClearinghouse CDFILake ForestCA23,322 0.1 
Brian M. RileyOxford Life Insurance CompanyPhoenixAZ39,984 0.2 
Virginia A. VarelaSoFi Bank, National Association (formerly Golden Pacific Bank, National Association)San FranciscoCA6,731 — 
Total1,175,077 5.5 %
188
Director NameName of Institution City State 
Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Jeffrey K. BallFriendly Hills Bank Whittier CA 8,346
 %
Bradley W. BealOne Nevada Credit Union Las Vegas NV 14,561
 
Craig G. BlundenProvident Savings Bank Riverside CA 81,078
 0.2
Marangal (Marito) DomingoFirst Technology Federal Credit Union Mountain View CA 667,316
 1.8
Simone LagomarsinoPacific Premier Bank Irvine CA 172,500
 0.5
Joan C. OppStanford Federal Credit Union Palo Alto CA 142,616
 0.4
Brian M. RileyMohave State Bank Lake Havasu City AZ 29,674
 0.1
John F. RobinsonSilicon Valley Bank Santa Clara CA 189,000
 0.5
Total      1,305,091
 3.5%

226




ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Capital stock ownership is a prerequisite to transacting any member business with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank). The members, former members, and certain other nonmembers own all the capital stock of the Bank, the majority of the directors of the Bank are officers or directors of members, and the Bank conducts its advances and purchased mortgage loan business almost exclusively with members or member successors. The Bank extends credit in the ordinary course of business to members with officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank and to members owning more than 5% of the Bank'sBank’s capital stock (5% shareholders) on market terms that are no more favorable to them than the terms of comparable transactions with other members. In addition, the Bank may transact short-term investments, Federal funds sold, and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) with members and their affiliates that have officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or with 5% shareholders. All investments are market rate transactions, and all MBS are purchased through securities brokers or dealers. The Bank may also be the primary obligor on debt issued in the form of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System consolidated obligations using underwriters and dealers, and may enter into interest rate exchange agreements with counterparties, that may be affiliates of Bank members with officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or affiliates of members and nonmembers owning more than 5% of the Bank'sBank’s capital stock, which are transactions in the ordinary course of the Bank'sBank’s business and are market rate transactions.

The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to establish an Affordable Housing Program (AHP). The Bank provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Only Bank members, along with their nonmember AHP project sponsors, may submit AHP applications. All AHP subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

The FHLBank Act also requires the Bank to establish a Community Investment Program (CIP) and authorizes the Bank to offer additional Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) programs. Under these programs, the Bank provides subsidies in the form of grants and below-market interest rate advances or standby letters of credit to members for community lending and economic development projects. Only Bank members may submit applications for these credit program subsidies. All CICA subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

In instances where an AHP or CICA transaction involves a member that owns more than 5% of the Bank'sBank’s capital stock (or an affiliate of such a member), a member with an officer or director who is a director of the Bank, or an entity with an executive officer, director, controlling shareholder, or general partner who serves as a director of the Bank (and that has a direct or indirect interest in the subsidy), the transaction is subject to the same eligibility and other program criteria and requirements as all other comparable transactions and to the regulations governing the operations of the relevant program.

The Bank may also use members that have officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or 5% shareholders or their affiliates as securities custodians and derivative dealer counterparties. These financial relationships are conducted in the ordinary course of business on terms and conditions similar to those that would be available for comparable services if provided by unaffiliated entities.

The Bank does not have a written policy to have the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (Board) review, approve, or ratify transactions with members that are outside the ordinary course of business because such transactions rarely occur. However, it has been the Bank'sBank’s practice to report to the Board all transactions between the Bank and its members that are outside the ordinary course of business, and, on a case-by-case basis, seek Board approval or ratification.







227189



Director Independence

General

Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Bank is required to identify directors who are independent, and members of the Board'sBoard’s Audit Committee and Compensation and Human Resources Committee and any committee performing similar functions to a nominating committee who are not independent, using the independence definition of a national securities exchange or automated quotation system. The Bank'sBank’s capital stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or automated quotation system, and the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors is not subject to the independence requirement of any such exchange or automated quotation system. The Bank is subject to the independence standards for directors serving on the Bank'sBank’s Audit Committee set forth in the rules of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), and looks to the Finance Agency independence standards to determine independence for all directors, whether or not they serve on the Audit Committee. In addition, for purposes of compliance with the SEC'sSEC’s disclosure rules only, the Board has evaluated director independence using the definition of independence articulated in the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ).

In addition to the independence rules and standards above, the FHLBanks are required to comply with the rules issued by the SEC under Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which includes a substantive independence rule prohibiting a director from being a member of the Audit Committee if he or she, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Audit Committee, the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directors,directors, or any other Board committee, accepts any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Bank or is an “affiliated person” of the Bank as defined by the SEC rules (the person controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Bank).

Director Independence under the Finance Agency Regulations

The Finance Agency director independence rule provides that a director is sufficiently independent to serve as a member of the Bank'sBank’s Audit Committee if that director does not have a disqualifying relationship with the Bank or its management that would interfere with the exercise of that director'sdirector’s independent judgment. Disqualifying relationships under the Finance Agency independence standards include, but are not limited to: (i) employment with the Bank at any time during the last five years; (ii) acceptance of compensation from the Bank other than for service as a director; (iii) being a consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter, or legal counsel for the Bank at any time within the last five years; and (iv) being an immediate family member of an individual who is or who has been a Bank executive officer within the past five years.

Although the Finance Agency'sAgency’s independence standard only applies by regulation to members of the Bank'sBank’s Audit Committee, the Bank'sBank’s Board looks to this standard for purposes of determining independence of all Bank directors.

The independence standard imposed on the Audit Committee under the Finance Agency regulations takes into account the fact that the Bank was created by Congress; the Bank has a cooperative ownership structure; the Bank is statutorily required to have member directors who are either an officer or director of a Bank member; the Bank was created to provide its members with products and services; and the Bank's BoardBank’s board of Directorsdirectors is statutorily required to administer the affairs of the Bank fairly and impartially and without discrimination in favor of or against any member borrower. The Finance Agency'sAgency’s independence standards do not include as a disqualifying relationship any business relationships between a director'sdirector’s member institution and the Bank. Consistent with the rule, the Bank'sBank’s Board does not believe that the statutorily prescribed business relationships between a director'sdirector’s member institution and the Bank interfere with the director'sdirector’s exercise of his or her independent judgment. The national securities exchanges'exchanges’ independence definition, including those of the NASDAQ, do not generally take into account the cooperative nature of the Bank. Accordingly, the Bank'sBank’s Board believes that the appropriate standard for measuring director independence is the Finance Agency'sAgency’s independence standards.

Applying the Finance Agency independence standards, the Board has determined that all directors who served in 20172021 were, and all current directors are, independent.

228190



Director Independence under the NASDAQ Rules

If the Bank uses the NASDAQ standard for purposes of complying with the SEC disclosure rules, the Board must make an affirmative determination that the director does not have a relationship with the Bank that would impair his or her independence.“Independent director” under the NASDAQ rules means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer'sissuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

In addition, the NASDAQ rules set forth seven relationships that automatically preclude a determination of director independence. Among other things, a director is not considered to be independent if the director is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Bank made, or from which the Bank received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient'srecipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000 (the payment and revenue relationship test), whichever is more. This particular relationship is referred to below as the payments/revenues relationship.

Using the NASDAQ rules, the Board affirmatively determined that in its opinion Mr. Adame, Ms. Akhlaghi, Ms. Gay, Ms. Guzman, Mr. Luikart, Mr. Murray, Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Siciliano, Mr. Syphax, and Mr. Wasley,Syphax, who are current nonmember directors and are not employed by and do not serve as a director of any member institution, are independent and, to the extent they served as nonmember directors in 2017,2021, were independent in 20172021 under the NASDAQ rules because they have no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities.

Using the NASDAQ rules, the following former non-member directors who served in 2021 were considered independent by the Board because they had no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors: Mr. Luikart and Mr. Wasley.
Using the NASDAQ rules, the Board affirmatively determined that in its opinion the following current member directors are independent and, to the extent they served as member directors in 2017,2021, were independent in 20172021 under the NASDAQ rules because they have no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors: Mr. Ball, Mr. Beal, Mr. Blunden, Mr. Domingo,Hendricksen, Ms. Lagomarsino, Ms. Miyashiro, Ms. Opp, Mr. Riley, and Mr. Robinson.

Ms. Varela.
In making these determinations, the Board recognized that during their directorships the member directors were employed by or served as a director of a member institution that may have conducted business with the Bank in the ordinary course of the Bank'sBank’s and the member institution’s respective businesses. The Board determined that these ordinary course customer relationships with the member institutions that had or have member directors on the Board would not interfere with the member directors'directors’ exercise of independent judgment or their independence from management under the NASDAQ rules. This determination is based on the fact that the Bank was created by Congress, the Bank has a cooperative ownership structure, the Bank is statutorily required to have member directors who are either an officer or director of a Bank member, the Bank was created to provide its members with products and services, and the Board is statutorily required to administer the affairs of the Bank fairly and impartially and without discrimination in favor of or against any member borrower.

Audit Committee Independence

The Board has an Audit Committee. Under the Finance Agency'sAgency’s independence standards and NASDAQ rules, all Audit Committee members who served in 20172021 were independent and all current Audit Committee members are independent.

All Audit Committee members who served in 20172021 and all current Audit Committee members met the substantive independence rules under Section 10A(m) of the 1934 Act.


229191



Compensation and Human Resources Committee Independence

The Board has a Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Using the Finance Agency'sAgency’s director independence standards, and under the NASDAQ rules, all Compensation and Human Resources Committee members who served in 20172021 were independent, and all current Compensation and Human Resources Committee members are independent.

Under the NASDAQ rules, to be considered an independent compensation committee member, a director must meet the definition under the general NASDAQ independence rules, and the board of directors must affirmatively determine the independence of any director who will serve on the company’s compensation committee and must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether such a director has a relationship to the company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member. Relevant factors must include the source of compensation of directors, including any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee paid by the company to the directors and whether the director is affiliated with the company.

Using the NASDAQ rules, the following current director serving on the Compensation and Human Resources Committee is not considered independent because his member institution exceeded the limits of the payment and revenue relationship test in 2021: Mr. Domingo.
Governance Committee

The Board has a Governance Committee that performs certain functions that are similar to those of a nominating committee with respect to the nomination of nonmember independent directors. Using the Finance Agency’s director independence standards, all Governance Committee members who served in 20172021 were independent and all current Governance Committee members are independent.


ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by its external accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

(In millions)20212020
Audit fees$1.3 $1.3 
All other fees— — 
Total$1.3 $1.3 
(In millions)2017
 2016
Audit fees$1.0
 $1.0
All other fees
 
Total$1.0
 $1.0

Audit Fees. Audit fees during 20172021 and 20162020 were for professional services rendered in connection with the audits of the Bank'sBank’s annual financial statements, the review of the Bank'sBank’s quarterly financial statements included in each Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the audit of the Bank'sBank’s internal control over financial reporting.

All Other Fees. All other fees for 20172021 and 20162020 were for consulting and advisory services. The Bank is exempt from all federal, state, and local taxation, and no tax consulting fees were paid during 20172021 and 2016.

2020.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations implementing the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC rules), all audit, audit-related, and non-audit services proposed to be performed by the Bank'sBank’s independent auditor must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee to ensure that they do not impair the auditor'sauditor’s independence. The SEC rules require that proposed services either be specifically pre-approved on a case-by-case basis (specific pre-approval services) or be pre-approved without case-by-case review under policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee that are detailed as to the particular service and do not delegate Audit Committee responsibilities to management (general pre-approval services).

192

The Bank'sBank’s Audit Committee has adopted a policy, the Independent Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy (Policy), setting forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the Bank's

230



Bank’s independent auditor may be approved. Under the Policy, unless services to be provided by the independent auditor have received general pre-approval, they require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding the pre-approved maximum fee amounts set forth in the appendices to the Policy will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

The Policy is designed to be detailed as to the particular services that may be provided by the independent auditor and to provide for the Audit Committee to be informed of each service provided by the independent auditor. The Policy is also intended to ensure that the Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibilities in connection with the approval of services to be provided by the independent auditor.

For both specific pre-approval and general pre-approval of services, the Audit Committee considers whether the proposed services are consistent with the SEC rules on auditor independence and whether the provision of the services by the independent auditor would impair the independent auditor'sauditor’s independence. The Audit Committee also considers (i) whether the independent auditor is positioned to provide effective and efficient services, given its familiarity with the Bank'sBank’s business, management, culture, accounting systems, risk profile, and other factors, and (ii) whether having the independent auditor provide the service may enhance the Bank'sBank’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The Audit Committee also considers the total amounts of fees for audit, audit-related, and non-audit services for a given calendar year in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may choose to determine, for a particular calendar year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit and audit-related services and the total amount of fees for permissible non-audit services.

The Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves the services that may be provided by the independent auditor during a given calendar year without specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has delegated to its chair and vice chair individually specific pre-approval authority for additional audit or audit-related services to be provided by the independent auditor, provided that the estimated fee for each type of proposed service does not exceed $50,000 and the total aggregated fees for all services pre-approved by each individual under this delegated authority do not exceed $100,000 in a calendar year. The chair or vice chair, as the case may be, is required to report to the Audit Committee any services pre-approved under the delegated authority.

In 20172021 and 2016,2020, 100% of the audit-related fees and all other fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.



193

PART IV.IV


ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1)Financial Statements

(a) (1)Financial Statements
The financial statements included as part of this Form 10-K are identified in the Index to Audited Financial Statements appearing in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated in this Item 15 by reference.10-K.


(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
(2)Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.


(b)Exhibits
Exhibit No.Description

Organization Certificate and resolutions relating to the organization of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

231




Bylaws of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, as amended and restated on January 26, 201825, 2022

Description of Registered Securities
Capital Plan, as amended and restated effective April 1, 2015, and updated August 3, 2015, to reflect adjustments to activity-based stock requirements,December 14, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14.2 to the Bank'sBank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 201612, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 20182022

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, effective November 5, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2019 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, effective May 15, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
Form of Senior Officer Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Form of Senior Officer Indemnification Agreement, effective June 9, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
Memorandum dated May 12, 2020 between the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Stephen Traynor for Special Award for Service as Acting President and Chief Executive Officer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398) (that supersedes the Memorandum Agreement dated May 12, 2020 between the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Stephen Traynor for Special Award for Service as Acting President and Chief Executive Officer filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2020 (Commission File No. 000-51398))
Employment Agreement by and among the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and John Gregory Seibly,Joseph E. Amato, dated April 26, 2016,October 7, 2020, as amended July 7, 2021. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Bank's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2016 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Change in Control Severance Agreement for Lisa B. MacMillen, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2011July 9, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
194


Employment Agreement by and among the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Teresa Bryce Bazemore, dated February 19, 2021, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
Board Resolution for 20182022 Board of Directors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy

Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 29, 2019; Appendices I-III, as approved December 23, 2016 and2016; Appendix IV, as approved December 1, 20172017; Appendix V, as approved December 7, 2018; and Appendix VI, as approved January 31, 2020; Appendix VII, as approved May 28, 2021; and Appendix VIII, as approved December 10, 2021

2016Supplemental Executive Performance UnitRetirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 29, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1310.10 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 201712, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

2016 Executive Performance Unit Plan Summary Description, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

2015 Executive Performance Unit Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

2015 Executive Performance Unit Plan Summary Description, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2018

Executive Benefit Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Original Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Deferred Compensation Plan, Amendedas amended and Restated Effectiverestated effective January 1, 2009,2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Bank's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy, as amended and restated on August 14, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1610.10 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 20146, 2020 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy, as amended and restated on July 30, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2021 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
Amended and Restated Federal Home Loan Bank P&I Funding and Contingency Plan Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, by and among the Office of Finance and each of the Federal Home Loan Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended August 5, 2011, with the other 11 Federal Home Loan Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

232




Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges – December 31, 2017

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Audit Committee Report
101
Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Bank's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, is formatted in XBRL interactive data files: (i) Statements of Condition at December 31, 2017 and 2016; (ii) Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015; (iii) Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015; (iv) Statements of Capital Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015; (v) Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015; and (vi) Notes to Financial Statements.

Audit Committee Report
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - The report containedinstance document does not appear in Exhibit 99.1 is being furnished and willthe interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File - The cover page interactive data file does not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofappear in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.


++     The report contained in Exhibit 99.1 is being furnished and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
233
195



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 9, 2018.4, 2022.
 
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
FEDERAL HOME LOAN /S/ TERESA B. BANK OF SAN FRANCISCOAZEMORE
/S/ J. GREGORY SEIBLY

J. Gregory Seibly
Teresa B. Bazemore
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 20184, 2022

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 9, 2018.4, 2022.
 
/S/ J. GREGORY SEIBLY

TERESA B. BAZEMORE
J. Gregory SeiblyTeresa B. Bazemore
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)
/S/ KENNETH C. MILLERJOSEPH E. AMATO
Kenneth C. Miller
SeniorJoseph E. Amato
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial officerofficer)
/S/ KITTY PAYNE
Kitty Payne
Senior Vice President
and Controller
(
Principal accounting officer)
/S/ JOHN F.SIMONE LUIKART  AGOMARSINO
John F. Luikart
Simone Lagomarsino
Chair of the Board of Directors
/S/ BRIAN M. RILEYF. DANIEL SICILIANO
Brian M. Riley
F. Daniel Siciliano
Vice Chair of the Board of Directors
/S/ JEFFREY K. BALL
Jeffrey K. Ball
Director
/S/ BRADLEY W. BEAL
Bradley W. Beal
Director
/S/ CRAIG G. BLUNDEN
Craig G. Blunden Director
/S/ MARANGAL I. DOMINGO
Marangal I. Domingo
Director

234



/S/ MELINDA GUZMANDAVID ADAME
David Adame
Director
Melinda Guzman
Director/S/ BANAFSHEH AKHLAGHI
Banafsheh Akhlaghi
Director
/S/ SIMONE LAGOMARSINOJEFFREY K. BALL
Jeffrey K. Ball
Director
196

Simone Lagomarsino
Director/S/ MARANGAL I. DOMINGO
Marangal I. Domingo
Director
/S/ KEVIN MURRAYLORI R. GAY
Lori R. Gay
Director
Kevin Murray
Director/S/ MELINDA GUZMAN
Melinda Guzman
Director
/S/ ROBERT F. NIELSENMATTHEW HENDRICKSEN
Matthew Hendricksen
Director
Robert F. Nielsen
Director/S/ SHRUTI MIYASHIRO
Shruti Miyashiro
Director
/S/ JOAN C. OPPKEVIN MURRAY
Kevin Murray
Director
/S/ JOAN C. OPP
Joan C. Opp

Director
/S/ JOHN F.BRIAN M. ROBINSONILEY
Brian M. Riley
Director
John F. Robinson
Director/S/ SCOTT C. SYPHAX
Scott C. Syphax
 Director
/S/ F. DANIEL SICILIANOVIRGINIA A. VARELA
F. Daniel Siciliano
Virginia A. Varela
Director
/S/ SCOTT C. SYPHAX 
Scott C. Syphax
 Director
/S/ JOHN T. WASLEY
John T. Wasley
Director


235

197