UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________.
Commission File No. 000-51399
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Federally chartered corporation31-6000228
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
600 Atrium Two, P.O. Box 598,
Cincinnati,OH45201-0598
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
(513(513) 852-7500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Stock, par value $100 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d).
Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes    No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).     Yes    No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated Filer 
Accelerated Filer 
Non-accelerated FilerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes   No
The capital stock of the registrant is not listed on any securities exchange or quoted on any automated quotation system, only may be owned by members and former members and is transferable only at its par value of $100 per share. At June 30, 2019,2020, the aggregate par value of all Class B stock held by members and former members was $3,829,090,700.$3,832,160,000. As of February 29, 2020,28, 2021, the registrant had 32,572,32424,788,058 shares of capital stock outstanding, which included stock classified as mandatorily redeemable.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

Page 1 of



Table of Contents
PART I
PART I
Item 1.Business
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial Statements for the Years Ended 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018
Notes to Financial Statements
Supplemental Financial Data
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary
Signatures

2

Table of Contents
PART I


Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Information

This document contains forward-looking statements that describe the objectives, expectations, estimates, and assessments of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the FHLB). These statements use words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “may,” and “should.” By their nature, forward-looking statements relate to matters involving risks or uncertainties, some of which we may not be able to know, control, or completely manage. Actual future results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which we are able to realize an objective, expectation, estimate, or assessment. Some of the risks and uncertainties that could affect our forward-looking statements include the following:

the effects of economic, financial, credit, market, and member conditions on our financial condition and results of operations, including changes in economic growth, general liquidity conditions, inflation and deflation, interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, mortgage originations, prepayment activity, housing prices, asset delinquencies, and members' mergers and consolidations, deposit flows, liquidity needs, and loan demand;
the effects of economic, financial, credit, market, and member conditions on our financial condition and results of operations, including changes in economic growth, general liquidity conditions, inflation and deflation, interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, mortgage originations, prepayment activity, housing prices, asset delinquencies, and members' mergers and consolidations, deposit flows, liquidity needs, and loan demand;

political, national or world events, including acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters, pandemics, or other catastrophic events, and legislative, regulatory, government, judicial or other developments that could affect us, our members, our counterparties, other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) and other government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), and/or investors in the Federal Home Loan Bank System's (FHLBank System or System) unsecured debt securities, which are called Consolidated Obligations (or Obligations);
political, national or world events, including acts of war, civil unrest, terrorism, natural disasters, climate change, pandemics, including the current COVID-19 pandemic, or other catastrophic events, and legislative, regulatory, government, judicial or other developments that could affect us, our members, our counterparties, other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) and other government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), and/or investors in the Federal Home Loan Bank System's (FHLBank System or System) unsecured debt securities, which are called Consolidated Obligations (or Obligations);

competitive forces, including those related to other sources of funding available to members, to purchases of mortgage loans, and to our issuance of Consolidated Obligations;
competitive forces, including those related to other sources of funding available to members, to purchases of mortgage loans, and to our issuance of Consolidated Obligations;

the financial results and actions of other FHLBanks that could affect our ability, in relation to the FHLBank System's joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, to access the capital markets on favorable terms or preserve our profitability, or could alter the regulations and legislation to which we are subject;
the financial results and actions of other FHLBanks that could affect our ability, in relation to the FHLBank System's joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, to access the capital markets on favorable terms or preserve our profitability, or could alter the regulations and legislation to which we are subject;

changes in investor demand for Consolidated Obligations;
changes in investor demand for Consolidated Obligations;

the volatility of market prices, interest rates, credit quality, and other indices that could affect the value of investments and collateral we hold as security for member obligations and/or for counterparty obligations;
the volatility of market prices, interest rates, credit quality, and other indices that could affect the value of investments and collateral we hold as security for member obligations and/or for counterparty obligations;

uncertainties related to the expected phasing out of London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) that could impact our mortgage-backed security (MBS) investments, Advances, Consolidated Obligations, derivatives, and collateral;
uncertainties related to the expected phasing out of London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) that could impact our mortgage-backed security (MBS) investments, Advances, Consolidated Obligations, derivatives, and collateral;

the ability to attract and retain skilled management and other key employees;
the ability to attract and retain skilled management and other key employees;

the ability to develop, secure and support technology and information systems that effectively manage the risks we face (including cybersecurity risks);
the ability to develop, secure and support technology and information systems that effectively manage the risks we face (including cybersecurity risks);

the risk of loss arising from failures or interruptions in our ongoing business operations, internal controls, information systems or other operating technologies;
the risk of loss arising from failures or interruptions in our ongoing business operations, internal controls, information systems or other operating technologies;

the ability to successfully manage new products and services; and
the ability to successfully manage new products and services; and

the risk of loss arising from litigation filed against us or one or more other FHLBanks.
the risk of loss arising from litigation filed against us or one or more other FHLBanks.

We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this document.


3
Item 1.
Business.


Item 1.Business.


COMPANY INFORMATION

Company Background

The FHLB is a regional wholesale bank that serves the public interest by providing financial products and services to our members to fulfill a public-policy mission of supporting housing finance and community investment. We are part of the FHLBank System. Each of the 11 FHLBanks operates as a separate entity with its own stockholders, employees, Board of Directors, and business model. Our region, known as the Fifth District, comprises Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee.

The U.S. Congress chartered the FHLBank System in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932 (the FHLBank Act) as a GSE to help provide liquidity and credit to the U.S. housing market and support home ownership. Promoting home ownership is a long-standing central theme of U.S. government policy. The System has a critical public-policy role as important national liquidity providers to mortgage lenders, particularly during stressful conditions when private-sector liquidity often proves unreliable.

The FHLBanks are not government agencies and the U.S. government does not guarantee, directly or indirectly, the debt securities or other obligations of the FHLBank System. Rather, the FHLBanks are GSEs, which combine private sector ownership with public sector sponsorship. In addition, the FHLBanks are cooperative institutions, privately and wholly owned by stockholders who are also the primary customers.

The FHLBank System also includes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) and the Office of Finance. The Finance Agency is an independent agency in the executive branch of the U.S. government that regulates the FHLBanks, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the Office of Finance. The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks that facilitates the issuance and servicing of the FHLBank System's Consolidated Obligations.

All federally insured depository institutions, certain insurance companies, and community development financial institutions chartered in the Fifth District may voluntarily apply for membership in our FHLB. Applicants must satisfy membership requirements in accordance with statutes and Finance Agency regulations. These requirements deal primarily with home financing activities, satisfactory financial condition such that Advances may be made safely, and matters related to the regulatory, supervisory and management oversight of the applicant. By law, an institution is permitted to apply for membership in only one FHLBank, although a holding company may have memberships in more than one FHLBank through its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2020, we had 628 members.

The combination of public sponsorship and private ownership that drives our business model is reflected in the composition of our 18-member17-member Board of Directors, all of whom members elect. Ten directors are officers and/or directors of our member institutions, while the remaining directors are Independent directors who represent the public interest.

At December 31, 2019, we had 640 members, 233 full-time employees, and one part-time employee. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Our internet address is www.fhlbcin.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Mission and Corporate Objectives

Our mission is to provide member-stockholders with financial services and a competitive return on their capital investment to help them facilitate and expand housing finance and community investment and achieve their objectives for liquidity and asset liability management.

How We Achieve the Mission
We achieve our mission through a cooperative business model. We raise private-sector capital from member stockholders and issue low-cost high-quality debt in the global capital markets jointly with other FHLBanks. The capital and proceeds from debt issuance enable us to provide members services—primarily, access to liquidity via reliable, readily available, and low-cost sources of funding to support their business activities including affordable housing and community investment. Another

important member service is that we offer a program to purchase certain mortgage loans, which provides members liquidity and helps them reduce market risk. Additionally, we provide a competitive return on members' capital investment in our company.

4

Our ability to best perform our mission depends on having a membership base that is an essential component of the nation’s housing and mortgage finance systems. We focus closely on fulfilling our mission for members who are community financial institutions, who we believe typically rely more on us for access to liquidity and mortgage markets compared with larger members. At the same time, we value having large members who are active borrowers because they provide the System the ability to consistently issue large amounts of debt, which helps ensure the debt has a relatively low cost, benefiting all members.

The primary products we offer, which we call Mission Assets, are readily available low-cost loans called Advances, purchases of certain whole mortgage loans sold by qualifying members through the Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP), and Letters of Credit. We also offer affordable housing programs and related activities to support members in their efforts to assist very low-, low- and moderate-income households and their local communities. To a more limited extent, we also have several correspondent services that assist members in operational administration.

The primary way we obtain funding is through participation in the issuance of the FHLBank System's Consolidated Obligations in the global capital markets. Secondary sources of funding are capital and deposits we accept from our members. A critical component of the success of the FHLBank System is its ability to maintain a comparative advantage in funding, which due to its GSE status, confers an implied guarantee from the U.S. federal government, low risk operations, and joint and several liability across the 11 FHLBanks. We regularly issue Obligations with a wide range of maturities, structures, and amounts, and at relatively favorable spreads to benchmark market interest rates (such as U.S. Treasury securities, LIBOR, Federal funds effective, and the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)) compared with many other financial institutions.

Because we are a cooperative organization with some members using our products more heavily than others and members having different percentages of capital stock, we must achieve a balance in generating membership value from product prices and characteristics and paying a competitive dividend rate. We attempt to achieve this balance by pricing Mission Asset ActivityAssets at relatively narrow spreads over funding costs, compared with other financial institutions, while still achieving acceptable profitability. Our cooperative ownership structure and deep access to debt markets allow our business to be scalable and self-capitalizing without taking undue risks, diminishing capital adequacy, or jeopardizing profitability.

Our franchise value is derived from the synergies brought by the various components of our business model, including the public-policy mandate, GSE status, cooperative ownership structure, consistent ability to issue large amounts of debt at favorable funding costs, and mechanisms of providing housing finance liquidity through products and services to financial institutions rather than directly to homeowners.

Corporate Objectives
Our corporate objectives, listed below, are intended to promote housing finance among members and ensure our operations and governance are effective and efficient.
Mission Asset Activity: Implement strategies and tactics and effectively manage operations to promote members’ usage of Mission Assets and stand ready at all times to provide liquidity to members.
Stock Return: Earn adequate profitability so that members receive a competitive long-term dividend on their capital stock investment.
Housing and Community Investment Programs: Maintain effective housing and community investment programs and offer targeted voluntary assistance programs.
Safe and Sound Operations:Optimize our counterparty and deposit ratings, achieve an acceptable rating on annual examinations, and have an adequate amount and composition of capital.
Risk Management: Employ effective risk optimization management practices and maintain risk exposures at low to moderate levels.
Governance: Operate in accordance with effective corporate governance processes that emphasize compliance and consider the interest of all stakeholders (members, stockholders, employees, creditors, housing partners, and regulators).

5

Stock Return: Earn adequate profitability so that members receive a competitive long-term dividend on their capital stock investment.
Housing and Community Investment Programs: Maintain effective housing and community investment programs and offer targeted voluntary assistance programs.
Safe and Sound Operations:Optimize our counterparty and deposit ratings, achieve an acceptable rating on annual examinations, and have an adequate amount and composition of capital.
Risk Management: Employ effective risk optimization management practices and maintain risk exposures at low to moderate levels.
Governance: Operate in accordance with effective corporate governance processes that emphasize compliance and consider the interest of all stakeholders (members, stockholders, employees, creditors, housing partners, and regulators).


Business Activities

Mission Asset Activity
The following are our principal business activities with members:

We lend readily-available, competitively-priced, and fully-collateralized Advances.
We lend readily-available, competitively-priced, and fully-collateralized Advances.

We issue collateralized Letters of Credit.
We issue collateralized Letters of Credit.

We purchase qualifying residential mortgage loans through the MPP and hold them on our balance sheet.
We purchase qualifying residential mortgage loans through the MPP and hold them on our balance sheet.

Together, these product offerings constitute “Mission Asset Activity.” We refer to Advances and Letters of Credit as Credit Services.

Affordable Housing and Community Investment
In addition, through various Housing and Community Investment programs, we assist members in serving very low-, low-, and moderate-income households and community economic development. These programs provide Advances at below-market rates of interest, as well as direct grants.

Investments
To help us achieve our mission and corporate objectives, we invest in highly-rated debt instruments of financial institutions and the U.S. government and in mortgage-related securities. In practice, these investments normally include liquidity instruments and longer-term MBS, as permitted by Finance Agency regulation. Investments provide liquidity, help us manage market risk exposure, enhance earnings, and through the purchase of mortgage-related securities, support the housing market.

Sources of Earnings

Our major source of revenue is interest income earned on Advances, MPP loans, and investments.

Major items of expense are:

interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits to fund assets;
interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits to fund assets;

costs of providing below-market-cost Advances and direct grants and subsidies under the Affordable Housing Program; and
costs of providing below-market-cost Advances and direct grants and subsidies under the Affordable Housing Program; and

non-interest expenses.
non-interest expenses.

The largest component of earnings is net interest income, which equals interest income minus interest expense. We derive net interest income from the interest rate spread earned on assets versus funding costs and the use of financial leverage.earnings from funding assets with capital. Each of these can vary over time with changes in market conditions, including most importantly interest rates, business conditions and our risk management activities.

We believe members' capital investment is comparable to investing in adjustable-rate preferred equity instruments. Therefore, we structure our balance sheet risk exposures so that earnings tend to move in the same direction as changes in short-term market rates, which can help provide a degree of predictability for dividend returns.

Capital

Due to our cooperative structure, we obtain capital from members. Each member must own capital stock as a condition of membership and normally must acquire additional stock above the membership stock amount in order to gain access to Mission Assets. Acquiring capital in connection with growth in Mission Assets ensures that these assets are self-capitalizing. We issue, redeem, and repurchase capital stock only at its stated par value of $100 per share. By law, our stock is not publicly traded.

We also maintain an amount of capital to ensure we meet all of our regulatory and business requirements relating to capital adequacy and protection of creditors against losses. We hold retained earnings to protect members' stock investment against impairment risk and to help stabilize dividend payments when earnings may be volatile.

6


Tax Status

We are exempt from all federal, state, and local taxation other than real property taxes. Any cash dividends we issue are taxable to members and do not benefit from the corporate dividends received exclusion. Notes 1 and 1410 of the Notes to Financial Statements provide additional details regarding the assessment for the Affordable Housing Program.

Ratings of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations

The FHLBank System's comparative advantage in funding is acknowledged in its excellent credit ratings from nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs). Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) currently assigns, and historically has assigned, the System's Consolidated Obligations the highest ratings available: long-term debt is rated Aaa and short-term debt is rated P-1. It also assigns a Prime-1 short-term bond rating on each FHLBank. It affirmed these ratings in 20192020 and maintained a stable outlook. In 2019,2020, Standard & Poor's affirmed its issuer credit ratings on each FHLBank and its AA+ ratings on the System's senior debt and also maintained a stable outlook. The ratings closely follow the U.S. sovereign ratings from both agencies.

The agencies' rationales for their ratings of the System and our FHLB include the System's status as a GSE; the joint and several liability for Obligations; excellent overall asset quality; extremely strong capacity to meet commitments to pay timely principal and interest on debt; strong liquidity; conservative use of derivatives; adequate capitalization relative to our risk profile; a stable capital structure; and the fact that no FHLBank has ever defaulted on repayment of, or delayed return of principal or interest on, any Obligation.

A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. A rating organization may revise or withdraw its ratings at any time, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We cannot predict what future actions, if any, a rating organization may take regarding the System's or our ratings.

Regulatory Oversight

Our business is subject to extensive regulation and supervision. The laws and regulations to which we are subject cover all key aspects of our business, and directly and indirectly affect our product and service offerings, pricing, competitive position and strategic plan, relationship with members and third parties, capital structure, cash needs and uses, and information security. As discussed throughout this document, such laws and regulations can have a significant effect on key drivers of our results of operations, including, for example, our capital and liquidity, product and service offerings, risk management, and costs of compliance.

The Finance Agency is headed by a Director who has regulatory authority to promulgate regulationsover the FHLBanks and to make other decisions. The Finance Agency is charged with ensuring that each FHLBank carries out its housing and community development finance mission, remains adequately capitalized, operates in a safe and sound manner, and complies with Finance Agency regulations. The Finance Agency is headed by a Director who has authority to promulgate regulations and to make other decisions.

To carry out these responsibilities, the Finance Agency conducts on-site examinations of each FHLBank at least annually, as well as periodic on- and off-site reviews, and receives monthly information on each FHLBank's financial condition and operating results. While an individual FHLBank has substantial discretion in governance and operational structure, the Finance Agency maintains broad supervisory and regulatory authority. In addition, the Comptroller General has authority to audit or examine the Finance Agency and the FHLBanks, to decide the extent to which the FHLBanks fairly and effectively fulfill the purposes of the FHLBank Act, and to review any audit, or conduct its own audit, of the financial statements of an FHLBank.


BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We manage the development, resource allocation, product delivery, pricing, credit risk management, and operational administration of our Mission Asset Activity in two business segments: Traditional Member Finance and the MPP. Traditional Member Finance includes Credit Services, Housing and Community Investment, Investments, some correspondent and deposit services, and other financial products of the FHLB. See the “Segment Information” section of “Results of Operations” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1814 of the Notes to Financial Statements for more information on our business segments, including their results of operations.

7

Traditional Member Finance

Credit Services
Advances. Advances are competitively priced sources of funds available for members to help manage their asset/liability and liquidity needs. Advances can both complement and be alternatives to retail deposits, other wholesale funding sources, and corporate debt issuance. We strive to facilitate efficient, fast, and continuous member access to funds. In most cases, members can access funds on a same-day basis.


We price a variety of standard Advance programs every business day and several other standard programs on demand. We also offer customized, non-standard Advances. Having diverse programs gives members the flexibility to choose and customize their borrowings according to size, maturity, interest rate, interest rate index (for adjustable-rate coupons), interest rate options, and other features.

Repurchase based (REPO) Advances are short-term, fixed-rate instruments structured similarly to repurchase agreements from investment banks, with one principal difference. Members collateralize their REPO Advances through our normal collateralization process, instead of being required to pledge specific securities as would be required in a typical repurchase agreement. A majority of REPO Advances outstanding have overnight maturities.

Adjustable-rate Advances have interest rates typically priced off benchmark rate indices such as LIBORSOFR, or SOFR.historically LIBOR. Adjustable-rate Advances may be structured at the member's option as either prepayable with a fee or prepayable without a fee if the prepayment is made on a repricing date.

Regular Fixed-Rate Advances have terms of 3 months to 30 years, with interest normally paid monthly and principal repayment normally at maturity. Members may choose to purchase call options on these Advances, although in the last several years, balances with call options have been at or close to zero.

Putable Advances are fixed-rate Advances that provide us an option to terminate the Advance, usually after an initial “lockout” period. Most have long-term original maturities. Selling us these options enables members to secure lower rates on Putable Advances compared to Regular Fixed-Rate Advances with the same final maturity.

Mortgage-Related Advances are fixed-rate, amortizing Advances with final maturities of 5 to 30 years. Some of these Advances, at the choice of the member, provide members with prepayment options without fees.

We also offer various other Advance programs that have smaller outstanding balances.

Letters of Credit. Letters of Credit are collateralized contractual commitments we issue on a member's behalf to guarantee its performance to third parties. A Letter of Credit may obligate us to make direct payments to a third party, in which case it is treated as an Advance to the member. The most popular use of Letters of Credit is as collateral supporting public unit deposits, which are deposits held by governmental units at financial institutions. We normally earn fees on Letters of Credit based on the actual average amount of the Letters utilized, which generally is less than the notional amount issued.

How We Manage Risks of Credit Services. We manage market risk from Advances by funding them with Consolidated Obligations and interest rate swaps that have similar interest rate risk characteristics as the Advances. The net effect is that in practice we mitigate nearly all of the market risk exposure associated with Advances.

In addition, for many, but not all, Advance programs, Finance Agency regulations require us to charge members prepayment fees for early termination of principal when the early termination results in an economic loss to us. We determine prepayment fees using standard present-value calculations that make us economically indifferent to the prepayment. The prepayment fee equals the present value of the estimated profit that we would have earned over the remaining life of the prepaid Advance. If a member prepays principal on an Advance that we have hedged with an interest rate swap, we may also assess the member a fee to compensate us for the cost we incur in terminating the swap before its stated final maturity. Some Advance programs are structured as non-prepayable and may have additional restrictions in order to terminate.

We manage credit risk on Advances by requiring each member to supply us with a security interest in eligible collateral that in the aggregate has estimated value in excess of the total Advances and Letters of Credit. Collateral is comprised mostly of single-family loans,single- and multi-family residential loans, commercial real estate loans, home equity loans, government guaranteed loans and bond securities. The combination of conservative collateral policies and risk-based credit underwriting activities mitigates virtually all potential credit risk associated with Advances and Letters of Credit. We have never experienced a credit loss on
8

Advances, nor have we ever determined it necessary to establish a loan loss reserve for Advances. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes 8 and 10Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements haveprovide more detail on our credit risk management of member borrowings.

Housing and Community Investment
Our Housing and Community Investment Programs include the Affordable Housing Program and various housing and community economic development-related Advance and grant programs. We fund the Affordable Housing Program with an

accrual equal to 10 percent of our previous year's net earnings, mandated by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. See Note 1410 of the Notes to Financial Statements for a complete description of the Affordable Housing Program calculation.

The Affordable Housing Program provides funding for the development of affordable housing. The Program consists of a Competitive Program and a homeownership program called Welcome Home, which assists homebuyers with down payments and closing costs. Under the Competitive Program, we currently distribute funds in the form of grants to members that apply and successfully compete in an annual offering. Under Welcome Home, we make funds available beginning in March until they have been fully committed. For both programs, the income of qualifying individuals or households must be 80 percent or less of the area median income. We set aside up to 35 percent of the Affordable Housing Program accrual for Welcome Home and allocate the remainder to the Competitive Program.

Our Board of Directors also may allocate funds to voluntary housing programs. In 2019,2020, the Board re-authorized an additional $2.1$2.0 million to the Carol M. Peterson Housing Fund for use during the year. In January 2020, the Board authorized $2.0 million to this fund for use in 2020. These funds are primarily used as grants to pay for accessibility rehabilitation and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners. In 2012, the Board of Directors also established the Disaster Reconstruction Program, a voluntary housing program that provides grants for purchase or rehabilitation of a home within the Fifth District for residents that have suffered loss or damage to their primary residence as a result of a state or federally declared disaster. Since the program's inception, we have disbursed over $3.9$4.7 million to assist 275378 households. Furthermore, in support of our members during the COVID-19 pandemic, we created a new Advance program that offered Advances with terms up to six months at zero percent interest to members between May 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. These Advances supported COVID-19 related assistance made by all Fifth District members. In 2020, we issued a total of $183 million of these Advances of which $34 million remained outstanding at December 31, 2020.

Two other housing programs that fall outside the auspices of the Affordable Housing Program are the Community Investment Program and the Economic Development Program. Advances under the former program have rates equal to our cost of funds, while Advances under the latter program have rates equal to our cost of funds plus three basis points.reasonable administrative costs. Members use the Community Investment Program to serve housing needs of low- and moderate-income households and, under certain conditions, community economic development projects. The Economic Development Program is a discounted Advance program used to promote economic development and job creation and retention.

Investments
Types of Investments. A primary reason we hold investments is to carry sufficient asset liquidity. Permissible liquidity investments include Federal funds, certificates of deposit, bank notes, bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and debt securities issued by the U.S. government, its agencies, or other GSE's. The first five categories represent unsecured lending to private counterparties. We also may place deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. We are prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from investing (secured or unsecured) in financial investments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. Many liquidity investments have short-term maturities.

9

Subject to regulatory limitations on purchases of new LIBOR-based investments, we are also permitted by regulation to purchase the following other investments, which have longer original maturities than liquidity investments:

MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations (together, referred to as MBS) issued by GSEs or private issuers;
MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations (together, referred to as MBS) issued by GSEs, other U.S. government agencies or private issuers;

asset-backed securities collateralized by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans issued by GSEs or private issuers; and
asset-backed securities collateralized by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans issued by GSEs or private issuers; and

marketable direct obligations of certain government units and agencies (such as state housing finance agencies) that supply needed funding for housing or community lending and that do not exceed 20 percent of our regulatory capital.
marketable direct obligations of certain government units and agencies (such as state housing finance agencies) that supply needed funding for housing or community lending and that do not exceed 20 percent of our regulatory capital.

We have never purchased asset-backed securities and do not own any privately-issued MBS.

Per Finance Agency regulations, the total investment in MBS and asset-backed securities may not exceed on a book value basis, 300 percent of previous month-end regulatory capital on the day we purchase the securities. See the “Capital Resources” section below for the definition of regulatory capital.


Purposes of Having Investments. The investments portfolio helps achieve corporate objectives in the following ways:

Liquidity management. Liquidity investments support the ability to fund assets on a timely basis, especially Advances, and when it may be more difficult to issue new debt. These investments supply liquidity because we normally fund them with longer-term debt than asset maturities. We also may be able to obtain liquidity by selling certain investments for cash without a significant loss of value.

Earnings enhancement. The investments portfolio, especially MBS, assists with earning a competitive return on capital, and increasing funding for Housing and Community Investment programs. In addition, liquidity investments help stabilize earnings because they typically earn a relatively stable spread to the cost of debt issued to fund them.

Management of debt issuance. Maintaining a short-term liquidity investment portfolio can help us participate in attractively priced debt issuances, on an opportunistic basis. We can temporarily invest proceeds from debt issuances in short-term liquid assets and quickly access them to fund demand for Mission Asset Activity, rather than having debt issuances dictated solely by the timing of member demand.

Support of housing market. Investment in MBS and state housing finance agency bonds directly supports the residential mortgage market by providing capital and financing for mortgages.

. Liquidity investments support the ability to fund assets on a timely basis, especially Advances, and when it may be more difficult to issue new debt. These investments supply liquidity because we normally fund them with longer-term debt than asset maturities. We also may be able to obtain liquidity by selling certain investments for cash without a significant loss of value.

Earnings enhancement. The investments portfolio, especially MBS, assists with earning a competitive return on capital, and increasing funding for Housing and Community Investment programs. In addition, liquidity investments help stabilize earnings because they typically earn a relatively stable spread to the cost of debt issued to fund them.

Management of debt issuance. Maintaining a short-term liquidity investment portfolio can help us participate in attractively priced debt issuances, on an opportunistic basis. We can temporarily invest proceeds from debt issuances in short-term liquid assets and quickly access them to fund demand for Mission Asset Activity, rather than having debt issuances dictated solely by the timing of member demand.

Support of housing market. Investment in MBS and state housing finance agency bonds directly supports the residential mortgage market by providing capital and financing for mortgages.

How We Manage Risks of Investments. We strive to ensure our investment holdings have a moderate degree of market risk and limited credit risk, which tends to lower the returns we can expect to earn on these securities. We believe that a philosophy of purchasing investments with a high amount of market or credit risk would be inconsistent with our GSE status and corporate objectives.

Market risk associated with short-term investments tends to be minimal because of their short maturities and because we typically fund them with short-term Consolidated Obligations having similar maturities. We mitigate much of the market risk of MBS, which exists primarily from changes in mortgage prepayment speeds, by limiting their balances to 300 percent of regulatory capital and by funding them with a portfolio of long-term fixed-rate callable and non-callable Obligations,Obligations. Additionally, we mitigate much of the market risk of longer-term non-MBS securities, and a portion of our MBS, by managingusing interest rate swaps to effectively convert the fixed rate investments to adjustable-rate investments. We also manage the market risk exposure of the entire balance sheet within prudent policy limits.

Finance Agency regulations and internal policies also provide controls on market risk exposure by restricting the types of mortgage loans, MBS and other investments we can hold. These restrictions prohibit, among others, the purchase of interest only or principal only stripped MBS and MBS whose average life varies more than six years under a 300 basis points interest rate shock.

Our internal policies specify guidelines for, and relatively tight constraints on, the types and amounts of short-term investments we are permitted to hold and the maximum amount of credit risk exposure we are permitted to have with eligible counterparties. We are permitted to invest only in the instruments of counterparties with high credit ratings, and because of our conservative
10

investment policies and practices, we believe all of our investments have high credit quality. We have never had a credit loss or credit-related write down of any investment security.

Deposits
We provide a variety of deposit programs, including demand, overnight, term and Federal funds, which enable depositors to invest funds in short-term liquid assets. We accept deposits from members, other FHLBanks, any institution to which we offer correspondent services, and other government instrumentalities. The rates of interest we pay on deposits are subject to change daily based on comparable money market interest rates. The balances in deposit programs tend to vary positively with the amount of idle funds members have available to invest, as well as the level of short-term interest rates. Deposits have typically represented less than one to two percent of our funding sources in recent years.

Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP or Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio)

Description of the MPP
Types of Loans and Benefits. Finance Agency regulations permit FHLBanks to purchase and hold specified whole mortgage loans from their members, which offers members a competitive alternative to the traditional secondary mortgage market and directly supports housing finance. We account for MPP loans as mortgage loans held for portfolio. By selling mortgage loans to us, members can increase their balance sheet liquidity and lower interest rate and mortgage prepayment risks. The MPP particularly enables small- and medium-sized community-based financial institutions to use their existing relationship with us to participate more effectively in the secondary mortgage market.


We purchase two types of mortgage loans: qualifying conforming fixed-rate conventional 1-4 family residential mortgages and residential mortgages fully insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Members approved to sell us these loans are referred to as Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs).

A “conventional” mortgage refers to a non-government-guaranteed mortgage. A “conforming” mortgage refers to the maximum amount permissible to be lent as a regular prime (i.e., non-jumbo, non-subprime) mortgage. For 2020,2021, the Finance Agency established the conforming limit at $510,400$548,250 with loans originated in a limited number of high-cost cities and counties receiving higher conforming limits. We have elected not to purchase mortgages subject to these higher conforming limits.

Loan Purchase Process. A Master Commitment Contract is negotiated with each PFI, in which the PFI agrees to make a best efforts attempt to sell us a specific dollar amount of mortgage loans generally over a period of up to 12 months. We purchase loans pursuant to a Mandatory Delivery Contract, which is a legal commitment we make to purchase, and a PFI makes to deliver, a specified dollar amount of mortgage loans, with a forward settlement date, at a specified range of note rates and prices.

Shortly before delivering the loans that will fill the Mandatory Delivery Contract, the PFI must submit loan level detail including underwriting information. We apply procedures through an automated system designed to screen loans that do not comply with our policies. Our underwriting guidelines generally mirror those of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for conforming conventional loans, although our guidelines and pool composition requirements are more conservative in a number of ways in order to further limit credit risk exposure. PFIs are required to make certain representations and warranties against our underwriting guidelines on the loans they sell to us. If a PFI sells us a loan in breach of those representations and warranties, we have the contractual right to require the PFI to repurchase the loan.

How We Manage Risks of the MPP
Market Risk. We mitigate the MPP's market risk similarly to how we mitigate market risk from MBS.

Credit Risk - Conventional Mortgage Loans. A unique feature of the MPP is that it separates the various activities and risks associated with residential mortgage lending for conventional loans and allows these risks and activities to be taken on by different entities. We manage the market risk (including interest rate risk and prepayment risk) and liquidity risk. PFIs manage marketing, originating and, in most cases, servicing the loans. PFIs may either retain servicing or sell it to a qualified and approved third-party servicer (also referred to as a PFI). Because PFIs manage and bear most of the credit risk, they do not pay us a guarantee fee to transfer credit risk.

We manage credit risk exposure for conventional loans primarily through underwriting and pool composition requirements and by applying layered credit enhancements. These enhancements, which apply after a homeowner's equity is exhausted, include available primary mortgage insurance, the Lender Risk Account (discussed below), and Supplemental Mortgage Insurance. Supplemental Mortgage Insurance is applicable to loans acquired before February 2011 and was purchased by the PFI from one
11

of our approved third-party providers naming us as the beneficiary. These credit enhancements are designed to protect us against credit losses in scenarios of severe downward movements in housing prices and unfavorable changes in other factors that can affect loan delinquencies and defaults.

The Lender Risk Account is a key component of how we manage residual credit risk. It is a holdback of a portion of the initial purchase price. Starting after five years from the loan purchase date, we may return the holdback to PFIs if they manage credit risk to pre-defined acceptable levels of exposure on the loan pools they sell to us. Actual loan losses are deducted from the amount of the purchase-price holdback we return to the PFI. The Lender Risk Account provides PFIs with a strong incentive to sell us high quality performing mortgage loans.

Credit Risk - FHA Mortgage Loans. Because the FHA makes an explicit guarantee on FHA loans, we do not require any credit enhancements on these loans beyond primary mortgage insurance.

"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides more detail on how we manage market and credit risks for the MPP.


Earnings from the MPP
The MPP enhances long-term profitability on a risk-adjusted basis and augments the return on member stockholders' capital investment. We generate earnings in the MPP from monthly interest payments minus the cost of funding and the cost of hedging the MPP's interest rate risk. Interest income on each loan is computed as the mortgage note rate multiplied by the loan's principal balance:

minus servicing costs (0.25 percent for conventional loans and 0.44 percent for FHA loans);
minus the cost of Supplemental Mortgage Insurance (for applicable loans); and
adjusted for the amortization of purchase premiums or the accretion of purchase discounts and for the amortization or accretion of fair value adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments.
minus servicing costs (0.25 percent for conventional loans and 0.44 percent for FHA loans);
minus the cost of Supplemental Mortgage Insurance (for applicable loans); and
adjusted for the amortization of purchase premiums or the accretion of purchase discounts and for the amortization or accretion of fair value adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments.

For new loan purchases, we consider the cost of the Lender Risk Account when we set conventional loan prices and evaluate the MPP's potential return on investment. The pricing of each structure depends on a number of factors and is specific to the PFI and to the loan pool. We do not receive fees or income for retaining the risk of losses in excess of any credit enhancements.


FUNDING - CONSOLIDATED OBLIGATIONS

Our primary source of funding and hedging market risk exposure is through participation in the sale of Consolidated Obligation debt securities to global investors. Obligations are the joint and several obligations of all the FHLBanks, backed only by the financial resources of these institutions.

There are two types of Consolidated Obligations: Consolidated Bonds (Bonds) and Consolidated Discount Notes (Discount Notes).

We participate in the issuance of Bonds for three purposes:

to finance and hedge intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate Advances and mortgage assets;
to finance and hedge short-term, adjustable-rate Advances, and swapped Advances, typically by synthetically transforming fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate funding through the execution of interest rate swaps; and
to acquire liquidity investments.
to finance and hedge intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate Advances and mortgage assets;
to finance and hedge short-term, adjustable-rate Advances, and swapped Advances, typically by synthetically transforming fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate funding through the execution of interest rate swaps; and
to acquire liquidity investments.

Bonds may have fixed or adjustable rates of interest. Fixed-rate Bonds are either non-callable or callable. A callable Bond is one that we are able to redeem in whole or in part at our discretion on one or more predetermined call dates according to the Bond's offering notice. The maturity of Bonds typically ranges from one1 year to 20 years. Adjustable-rate Bonds use a benchmark market interest rate, typically LIBOR or SOFR, for interest rate resets. We do not participate in the issuance of range Bonds, zero coupon Bonds, or indexed principal redemption Bonds.

We use fixed-rate Bonds to fund longer-term fixed-rate Advances and longer-term fixed-rate mortgage assets, and use adjustable-rate Bonds to fund adjustable-rate Advances and certain longer-term fixed rate investments that have been swapped to an adjustable-rate.

12

We transact in interest rate swaps to synthetically convert some fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate terms. These are used to hedge adjustable-rate Advances.

We participate in the issuance of Discount Notes to fund short-term Advances, adjustable-rate Advances, putable Advances (which we normally swap to an adjustable-rate), liquidity investments, and a portion of longer-term fixed-rate assets. Discount Notes have maturities from one day to one year, with most of ours normally maturing within three months.

The mix of Obligations fluctuates in response to relative changes in short-term versus long-term assets, relative changes in fixed-rate versus adjustable-rate assets, decisions on market risk management (particularly the amount of funding of longer-term assets with short-term Obligations), and differences in relative costs of various Obligations.
Interest rates on Obligations are affected by a multitude of factors such as: overall economic and credit conditions; credit ratings of the FHLBank System; investor demand and preferences for our debt securities; the level of interest rates and the shape of the U.S. Treasury curve, and the SOFR swap curve or LIBOR swap curve; and the supply, volume, timing, and characteristics of debt issuances by the FHLBanks, other GSEs, and other highly rated issuers.


Finance Agency regulations govern the issuance of Obligations. An FHLBank may not issue individual debt securities without Finance Agency approval, and we have never done so. The Office of Finance services Obligations, prepares the FHLBank System's quarterly and annual combined financial statements, and serves as a source of information for the FHLBanks on capital market developments.

We have the primary liability for our portion of Obligations, i.e., those issued on our behalf for which we received the proceeds. However, we also are jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Obligations. If we do not pay the principal or interest in full when due on any Obligation issued on our FHLB's behalf, we are prohibited from paying dividends or redeeming or repurchasing shares of capital stock. If another FHLBank were unable to repay its participation in an Obligation for which it is the primary obligor, the Finance Agency could call on each of the other FHLBanks to repay all or part of the Obligation. The Finance Agency has never invoked this authority.


LIQUIDITY

Our business requires a substantial and continual amount of liquidity to satisfy financial obligations (primarily maturing Consolidated Obligations) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and to provide members access to timely Advance funding and mortgage loan sales in all financial environments. We obtain liquidity by issuing debt, holding short-term assets that mature before their associated funding, and having the ability to sell certain investments without significant accounting or economic consequences. Sources of asset liquidity include cash, maturing Advances, maturing investments, principal paydowns of mortgage assets, the ability to sell certain investments, and interest payments received. Uses of liquidity primarily include repayments of Obligations, issuances of new Advances, purchases of loans under the MPP, purchases of investments, and payments of interest.

Liquidity requirements are significant because Advance balances can be volatile, many have short-term maturities, and we strive to allow members to borrow Advances on the same day they request them. We regularly monitor liquidity risks and the investment and cash resources available to meet liquidity needs, as well as statutory and regulatory liquidity requirements.

Because Obligations have favorable credit ratings and because the FHLBank System is one of the largest sellers of debt in the worldwide capital markets, the System historically has been able to satisfy its liquidity needs through debt issuance across a wide range of structures at relatively favorable spreads to benchmark market interest rates, such as U.S. Treasury securities.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Requirements

Statutory and Regulatory Requirements

Under Finance Agency regulations, regulatory capital is composed of all capital stock (including stock classified as mandatorily redeemable), retained earnings, general loss allowances, and other amounts from sources the Finance Agency determines are available to absorb losses. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLB Act), permanent capital equals Class B stock plus retained earnings and is available to absorb financial losses.
13


Finance Agency regulations stipulate that we must comply with three limits on capital leverage and risk-based capital. These ensure a low amount of capital risk while providing for competitive profitability. We have always complied with these regulatory capital requirements.

We must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. This requirement historically has been closest to affecting our operations.
We must maintain at least a five percent minimum leverage ratio of capital divided by total assets, which includes a 1.5 weighting factor applicable to permanent capital. Because all of our Class B stock is permanent capital, this requirement is met automatically if we satisfy the four percent unweighted capital requirement.
We are subject to a risk-based capital rule in which we must hold an amount of "permanent" capital that exceeds the amount of exposure to market risk, credit risk, and operational risk. How we determine the amount of these risk exposures is stipulated by Finance Agency regulation. Permanent capital includes retained earnings and the regulatory amount of Class B capital stock.

We must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. This requirement historically has been closest to affecting our operations.
We must maintain at least a five percent minimum leverage ratio of capital divided by total assets, which includes a 1.5 weighting factor applicable to permanent capital. Because all of our Class B stock is permanent capital, this requirement is met automatically if we satisfy the four percent unweighted capital requirement.
We are subject to a risk-based capital rule in which we must hold an amount of "permanent" capital that exceeds the amount of exposure to market risk, credit risk, and operational risk. How we determine the amount of these risk exposures is stipulated by Finance Agency regulation. Permanent capital includes retained earnings and the regulatory amount of Class B capital stock.

In addition to the minimum capital requirements, the GLB Act and our Capital Plan promote the adequacy of our capital to absorb financial losses in three ways. These combine to give member stockholders a clear incentive to require us to minimize our risk profile:

the five-year redemption period for Class B stock;
the option we have to call on members to purchase additional capital if required to preserve safety and soundness; and
the limitations, described below, on our ability to honor requested redemptions of capital if we are at risk of not maintaining safe and sound operations.
the five-year redemption period for Class B stock;
the option we have to call on members to purchase additional capital if required to preserve safety and soundness; and
the limitations, described below, on our ability to honor requested redemptions of capital if we are at risk of not maintaining safe and sound operations.

In accordance with the GLB Act, our stock is also putable by members. There are statutory and regulatory restrictions on our obligation or right to redeem or repurchase outstanding stock, including, but not limited to, the following:

We may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, we would fail to satisfy any regulatory capital requirements. By law, we may not redeem any stock if we become undercapitalized.
We may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, we would fail to satisfy any regulatory capital requirements. By law, we may not redeem any stock if we become undercapitalized.

We may not redeem any capital stock without approval of the Finance Agency if either our Board of Directors or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred or are likely to incur losses resulting or expected to result in a charge against capital.
We may not redeem any capital stock without approval of the Finance Agency if either our Board of Directors or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred or are likely to incur losses resulting or expected to result in a charge against capital.

If we were to be liquidated, stockholders would be entitled to receive the par value of their capital stock after payment in full to our creditors. In addition, each stockholder would be entitled to any retained earnings in an amount proportional to the stockholder's share of the total shares of capital stock. In the event of a merger or consolidation of the FHLB, the Board of Directors would determine the rights and preferences of the FHLB's stockholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.

Capital Plan
Our Capital Plan ties the amount of each member's required capital stock to the amount of the member's assets and the amount and type of its Mission Asset Activity with us. The Capital Plan has the following basic characteristics:
14


We offer only one class of capital stock, Class B, which is generally redeemable upon a member's five-year advance written notice. We strive to manage capital risks to be able to safely and soundly satisfy redemption requests sooner than five years, although we may elect to wait up to five years (or longer under certain conditions).
We offer only one class of capital stock, Class B, which is generally redeemable upon a member's five-year advance written notice. We strive to manage capital risks to be able to safely and soundly satisfy redemption requests sooner than five years, although we may elect to wait up to five years (or longer under certain conditions).

We issue shares of capital stock as required for an institution to become a member or maintain membership (membership stock), as required for members to capitalize Mission Asset Activity (activity stock), and if we pay dividends in the form of additional shares of stock.
We issue shares of capital stock as required for an institution to become a member or maintain membership (membership stock), as required for members to capitalize Mission Asset Activity (activity stock), and if we pay dividends in the form of additional shares of stock.

We may, subject to the restrictions described above, repurchase certain capital stock (i.e., "excess" capital stock).
We may, subject to the restrictions described above, repurchase certain capital stock (i.e., "excess" capital stock).

The concept of “cooperative capital,” explained below, better aligns the interests of heavy users of our products with light users by enhancing the dividend return and providing a more stable base of capital.

We believe the Capital Plan enables us to efficiently increase and decrease capital stock needed to capitalize assets in response to changes in the membership base and demand for Mission Asset Activity. This enables us to maintain a prudent amount of financial leverage and consistently generate a competitive dividend return.

At December 31, 2019,2020, the amount of membership stock required for each member ranged from a minimum of $1,000 to a maximum of $30 million, with the amount within that range determined as a percentage of member assets. Separate from its membership stock, each member is required to purchase and hold activity stock to capitalize its Mission Asset Activity. For purposes of the Capital Plan, Mission Asset Activity includes the principal balance of Advances, guaranteed funds and rate Advance commitments, and the principal balance of loans and commitments in the MPP.MPP, and beginning January 1, 2021, the notional balance of Letters of Credit.


The FHLB must capitalize all Mission Asset Activity with capital stockits total assets at a rate of at least four percent. However, eachThe Capital Plan supports the memberships' stock component towards this overall requirement. Each member is permittedrequired to maintain an amount of activity stock within thea range of a minimum and maximum percentagespercentage for each type of Mission Asset Activity. The Capital Plan amendment that went into effect on January 1, 2021 changed the activity percentages and set these minimums and maximums to be equal. As a result, the current percentages are as follows:
Mission Asset Activity Minimum Activity Percentage Maximum Activity PercentageMission Asset ActivityMinimum Activity PercentageMaximum Activity Percentage
Advances    2%    4%Advances4.50%4.50%
Advance Commitments 2 4Advance Commitments4.504.50
MPP 0 4MPP3.003.00
Letters of CreditLetters of Credit0.100.10
If a member owns more stock than is needed to satisfy both its membership stock requirement and the maximum activity stock percentages for its Mission Asset Activity, we designate the remaining stock as the member's excess capital stock. The member may utilize its excess stock to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity.

IfPrior to 2021, if an individual member's excess stock reachesreached zero, the Capital Plan normally permitshad permitted us, with certain limits, to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity of that member with excess stock owned by other members at the maximum percentage rate. This feature, called “cooperative capital,” enablesenabled us to more effectively utilize our excess capital stock. The limitstock holdings. However, with the most recently amended Capital Plan, by setting the minimum and maximum activity requirements to how muchbe equal, members are no longer able to utilize this cooperative capital a member may use is currently set at $100 million. A member's use of cooperative capital reduces the ratio of its activity stock to its Mission Asset Activity for each type of Mission Asset Activity. When a member's ratio of activity stock to its Mission Asset Activity reaches the minimum activity stock percentage for all types of Mission Asset Activity, the member must capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity of a given type by purchasing capital stock at that asset type's minimum percentage rate, assuming availability of cooperative capital.marginal new business.

Retained Earnings

Purposes and Amount of Retained Earnings
Retained earnings are important to protect members' capital stock investment against the risk of impairment and to enhance our ability to pay stable and competitive dividends when earnings may be volatile. Impairment risk is the risk that members would have to write down the par value of their capital stock investment in our FHLB as a result of their analysis of ultimate recoverability. An extreme situation of earnings instability, in which other-than-temporary losses were experienced and expected for a period of time, could result in members determining that the value of their capital stock investment was impaired.

We have a policy that sets forth a range for theminimum amount of retained earnings we believe is needed to mitigate impairment risk and facilitate dividend stability in light of the risks we face. At December 31, 2019,2020, the minimum retained earnings requirement ranges from $200 million to $375was approximately $290 million, based on mitigating quantifiable risks under very stressed business and market scenarios to a 99
15

percent confidence level. At the end of 2019,2020, our retained earnings totaled $1,094 million.$1.3 billion. We believe the current amount of retained earnings is fully sufficient to protect our capital stock against impairment risk and to provide for dividend stability.

Joint Capital Agreement to Augment Retained Earnings
The FHLBanks entered into a Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement (the “Capital Agreement”) in February 2011. The Capital Agreement provides that each FHLBank will, on a quarterly basis, allocate quarterly at least 20 percent of its net income to a restricted retained earnings account (the “Account”). until the balance of the Account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding Consolidated Obligations for the calendar quarter. The Account is not available to be distributed as dividends except under certain limited circumstances. The Capital Agreement does not limit our ability to use retained earnings held outside of the Account to pay dividends. Although we have always maintained compliance with our capital requirements, we believe the Capital Agreement enhances risk mitigation by building a larger capital buffer over time to absorb unexpected losses, if any, that we may experience.


USE OF DERIVATIVES

Finance Agency regulations and our policies establish guidelines for the execution and use of derivative transactions. We are prohibited from trading in, or the speculative use of, derivatives and have limits on the amount of credit risk to which we may be exposed. Most of our derivatives activity involves interest rate swaps, some of which may include options. We account for all derivatives at fair value.


Similar to our participation in debt issuances, use of derivatives is integral to hedging market risk created by Advances, certain longer-term fixed-rate investments and mortgage assets, including commitments. Derivatives related to Advances most commonly hedge either:

below-market rates and/or the market risk exposure on Putable Advances, and certain other Advances, for which members have sold us options embedded within the Advances; or
below-market rates and/or the market risk exposure on Putable Advances, and certain other Advances, for which members have sold us options embedded within the Advances; or

Regular Fixed-Rate Advances when it may not be as advantageous to issue Obligations or when it may improve our market risk management.
Regular Fixed-Rate Advances when it may not be as advantageous to issue Obligations or when it may improve our market risk management.

The derivatives we transact related to investments hedge market risk exposure by effectively converting the fixed-rate investment to an adjustable-rate investment. The derivatives we transact related to mortgage assets primarily hedge interest rate risk and prepayment risk. Such derivatives include options on interest rates swaps (swaptions) and sales of to-be-announced MBS for forward settlement.

Derivatives transactions related to Bonds help us intermediate between the preference of capital market investors for intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate debt securities and the preference of our members for shorter-term or adjustable-rate Advances. We can satisfy the preferences of both groups by issuing long-term fixed-rate Bonds and entering into an interest rate swap that synthetically converts the Bonds to an adjustable-rate funding basis that matches up with the short-term and adjustable-rate Advances, thereby preserving a favorable interest rate spread.

We may also transact derivatives to reduce the repricing risk of Discount Notes that fund certain overnight and shorter-term assets.

16

Use of derivatives can result in a substantial amount of volatility of accounting and economic earnings. We strive to maintain a low amount of earnings volatility from realized gains and losses on derivatives. We accept a higher amount of earnings volatility from unrealized gains and losses on recording derivatives at fair values, to the extent our use of derivatives effectively hedge market risk exposure.


COMPETITION

Advances
Members' demand for our Advances is affected by, among other things, the cost of other sources of funding available, including our members' customer deposits. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured, including the federal government, commercial banks, investment banking divisions of commercial banks, brokered deposits and other FHLBanks when our members' affiliated institutions are members of other FHLBanks. In addition, competition is often more significant when originating Advances to larger members, which have greater access to the national and global capital markets.

Our ability to compete successfully with other suppliers of wholesale funding, including other FHLBanks, depends primarily on the total cost of our products to members, which include the rates we charge, earnings and dividend performance, collateral policies, capital stock requirements, product features and members' perceptions of our relative safety and soundness. In addition, our competitive environment continues to be impacted by the Federal Reserve's low interest-rate environment.environment and actions to provide liquidity in the financial markets. See Item 1A. Risk Factors below for further discussion.

Mortgage Purchase Program
The primary competitors for mortgage loans we purchase in the MPP are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), and other secondary mortgage market conduits. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in particular, have long-established and efficient programs and are the dominant purchasers of fixed-rate conventional mortgages. In addition, a number of private financial institutions have well-established securitization programs, although they may not currently be as active as they were historically. The MPP also competes with the Federal Reserve to the extent it purchases MBS and affects market prices and the availability of supply.

Debt Issuance
The FHLBank System primarily competes with the U.S. government and other GSEs for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs.



HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our human capital is a significant contributor to the success of our strategic business objectives. As such, we are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant operating environment changes, safety protocols and procedures that we determined were in the best interest of our employees and members, and which comply with government regulations. This includes having nearly all employees work remotely, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing any on-site work.

In managing human capital, we focus on our workforce profile and the various programs and philosophies described below.

Workforce Profile
Our workforce is primarily comprised of corporate employees, with one location of principal operations. As of December 31, 2020, we had 241 employees. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 37 percent of our workforce was female, 63 percent male, 85 percent non-minority and 15 percent minority. Our workforce is leanly staffed, and historically has included a number of longer-tenured employees. As of December 31, 2020, the average tenure of our employees was 10 years. We strive to both develop talent from within the organization and supplement with external hires. We believe that developing talent internally results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes loyalty and commitment in our employee base, which furthers our success. However, adding new employees contributes to new ideas, continuous improvement, and our goals of a diverse and inclusive workforce. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit.

Total Rewards
We seek to attract, develop and retain talented employees to achieve our strategic business initiatives, enhance business performance and provide members with financial services and a competitive return on their capital investment. We strive to
17

achieve this objective through a combination of development programs, benefits and employee wellness programs, and recognizing and rewarding performance. Specifically, our programs include:
Cash compensation – provides competitive salary, transportation and other cash subsidies, and performance based incentives.
Benefits – offers health insurance with a health savings account contribution, dental and vision insurance, life and AD&D insurance, supplemental life insurance, long-term disability insurance, employee assistance program, 401(k) retirement savings plan with employer match, and defined benefit pension benefits.
Recognition programs – sponsors peer-to-peer recognition program, department recognition program and company-wide recognition.
Work / life balance – provides flexible scheduling and time off programs for vacation, illness, personal, holiday, bereavement, jury duty, and paid leave programs for times when caring for a sick family member, bonding with a newborn or recovering from childbirth.
Culture – promotes the five core values of dependable, customer focused, inclusive, change oriented and results driven and encourages employee resource groups and other culture and inclusion initiatives.
Development programs and training – offers tuition assistance programs, internal educational and development opportunities, and fee reimbursement for external educational and development programs.
Management succession planning – assesses talent annually with our leadership and Board of Directors with, at a minimum, a defined plan for positions at Vice President and above.

Diversity and Inclusion Program
Diversity and inclusion is a strategic business priority. Our diversity and inclusion officer reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as a liaison to the Board of Directors, and is a member of the senior management strategy council. We recognize that diversity increases capacity for innovation and creativity and that inclusion allows us to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthen retention efforts. We operationalize our commitment through the development and execution of a three-year diversity and inclusion strategic plan that includes quantifiable metrics to measure its success. Our diversity and inclusion officer and team reports regularly on performance against the strategic plan to management and the Board of Directors. We offer a range of opportunities for our employees to connect, and grow personally and professionally through employee resource groups and community outreach. We consider learning an important component of our diversity and inclusion strategic plan and regularly offer educational opportunities to our employees. Employee job descriptions contain inclusive behavior expectations that increase with increasing responsibilities in the organization, and also are included as part of our annual performance management process.
18


Item 1A.    Risk Factors.        

The following are the most importantdiscussion summarizes risks and uncertainties we currently face. The realization of one or more of the risks could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition, safety and soundness, and, at the extreme, the viability of our business franchise. The effects could include reductions in Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings and dividends, and, at the extreme, impairment of our capital or an inability to participate in issuances of Consolidated Obligations. The risks identified below are not the only risks we face. Other risks not presently known or which we deem to be currently immaterial may also impact our business. Additionally, the risks identified may adversely affect our business in ways we do not expect or anticipate.

Economy.
BUSINESS AND REGULATORY RISK
An
A prolonged economic downturn could further lower Mission Asset Activity and profitability.

Member demand for Mission Asset Activity depends in large part on the general health of the economy and overall business conditions. Numerous external factors can affect our Mission Asset Activity and earnings including:

the general state and trends of the economy and financial institutions, especially in the Fifth District;
conditions in the financial, credit, mortgage, and housing markets;
interest rates;
competitive alternatives to our products, such as retail deposits and other sources of wholesale funding;
regulations affecting our members' liquidity requirements;
actions of the Federal Reserve to affect liquidity reserves of financial institutions and the money supply; and
the willingness and ability of financial institutions to expand lending.

A recessionarythe general state and trends of the economy and financial institutions, especially in the Fifth District;
conditions in the financial, credit, mortgage, and housing markets;
interest rates;
actions of the Federal Reserve to affect liquidity reserves of financial institutions and the money supply;
competitive alternatives to our products, such as retail deposits and other sources of wholesale funding;
regulations affecting our members' liquidity requirements;
the willingness and ability of financial institutions to expand lending; and
natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies (see the separate Risk Factor on the COVID-19 pandemic), terrorist attacks, civil unrest, or other unanticipated or catastrophic events could create economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties.

These external factors, some of which were experienced in 2020, are likely to have a more severe impact if a prolonged economic downturn is accompanied by significant changes in interest rates, stresses in the housing market, elevated competitive forces, or actual or potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment. Any of these factors, or a combination of factors, could adversely affect our business activities and results of operations and may lower the demand for Mission Asset Activity, decrease profitability, andultimately cause stockholders to request redemption of a portion of their capital or request withdrawal from membership (both referred to in this document as “request withdrawal of capital”). These unfavorable effects are more likely to occur and be more severe if a weak economy is accompanied by significant changes in interest rates, stresses in the housing market, elevated competitive forces, or actual or potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment.

In addition,For example, we believe overall Advance demand has been and continues to be unfavorably affected by the substantial amount of deposit-based liquidity provided to financial institutions through the monetary actions of the Federal Reserve and changes in our members' ability to manage their regulatory liquidity requirements. See the "Competition" risk factor for further discussion.

As noted above, our business and results of operations may be affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, including the Federal Reserve, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The Federal Reserve’s policies directlyfacilitate liquidity and indirectly influence the financial markets. For example, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) approved emergency reductions to the target range for the Federal funds rate in March 2020, in response to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and the potential negative impact on the U.S. economy. In addition, U.S. Treasury yields have declined in 2020, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield and fixed mortgage rates reaching record lows in March. Further adverse changessupport stability in the fixed-income markets, or further actionwhich in responseturn has generally led to this widespread health emergency could adversely affectsubstantial deposit growth for our financial condition, results of operations,members and ability to pay dividends. Refer todecreases in their demand for Advances. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information on recent market activity.

Competition.The competitive environment for our products could adversely affect business activities, including decreasing the level and utilization rates of Mission Asset Activity, earnings, and capitalization.

Our primary business is providing liquidity to our members by making Advances to, and purchasing mortgage loans from, our members. Members have access to alternative funding sources, including their customers' deposits and wholesale funding, which may offer more favorable terms than we offer, such as lower rates or more flexible credit or collateral standards. Some of our competitors are not subject to the same body of regulations applicable to us, which enables those competitors to offer products and terms that we are not able to offer. In addition, state and federal regulators’ perception of the stability and reliability of our Advances can also directly impact the amount of Advances used by members.


19

In connection with purchasing mortgage loans from our members, we face competition in the areas of customer service, purchase prices for the MPP loans and ancillary services such as automated underwriting and loan servicing options. Our primary competitors are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, government agencies such as Ginnie Mae, and other secondary mortgage market conduits. In addition, our members continue to face increased competition in mortgage origination competition from originatorsnon-bank financial institutions that are not eligible for FHLBank membership, which could reduce the amount of mortgage loans that members can make available to us to purchase.

Increased competition could decrease the amount of Advances and mortgage loans and narrow profitability, on those products, both of which could cause stockholders to request withdrawals of capital.capital and ultimately result in a failure to meet our capital adequacy requirements.

In addition, the FHLBank System's offerings of debt compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, other GSEs, and corporate, state, and sovereign entities, among others. Increases in the supply and types of competing debt products or other regulatory factors could adversely affect the System's ability to access funding or increase the cost of our debt issuance. Either of these effects could in turn adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of FHLB membership.

Business Concentration and Consolidation and Composition of the Financial Industry.Sharp reductions in Mission Asset Activity resulting from lower usage by large members, consolidation of large members, or continued shift in mortgage lending activities towards entities not eligible for FHLB membership could adversely impact our net income and dividends.

The amount of Mission Asset Activity and capital is concentrated among a small number of our large members. Additionally, the financial industry continues to consolidate and in recent years there has been a systemic trend of financial institutions that are currently ineligible for FHLB membership gaining an increasing market share, especially related to mortgage finance. However, the legislative and regulatory environment faced by the FHLBanks has not changed in response to this trend. Our members could decrease their Mission Asset Activity and the amount of their capital stock as a result of merger and acquisition activity or continued loss of market share to ineligible entities. At December 31, 2019,2020, one member, U.S. Bank, N.A., held nearly 30over 15 percent of our Advances and one member PFI, Union Savings Bank, accounted for over 30 percent of the outstanding MPP principal balance. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in Mission Asset Activity because we can undertake commensurate reductions in liability balances and capital and because of our relatively modest operating expenses. However, an extremely large and sustained reduction in Mission Asset Activity could affect our profitability and ability to pay competitive dividends, as well as, at the FHLBank System level, raise policy questions about the relevance of the FHLBank System in its traditional mission of supporting housing finance.

Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
GSE Reform.
In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021 it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. In response, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) to 1) develop a robust alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR and 2) develop a plan to encourage its use in derivatives and other transactions as appropriate. The ARRC has settled on the establishment of SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018 and since then, the market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk. As many of our assets and derivatives are indexed to LIBOR, we have developed and implemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and balance sheet management.

In September 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter providing LIBOR transition guidance. Under the supervisory letter, the FHLBanks were directed, by December 31, 2019, to cease purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021, and, by March 31, 2020, to no longer enter into any other new LIBOR
20

referenced financial assets, liabilities and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021. Except for investments and option embedded products, the ability to enter into new LIBOR referenced transactions was extended to June 30, 2020. As a result of the limitations introduced by the Finance Agency, we may experience less flexibility in our access to funding, higher funding costs, increased basis risk, lower overall demand or increased costs of Advances, and a lack of suitable investment alternatives. Accordingly, the composition of our balance sheet, capital stock level, primary mission assets ratio and net income may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the limitations within the supervisory letter may impact our ability to manage interest-rate risk, which may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

During the market transition away from LIBOR, LIBOR may experience increased volatility, and the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may also experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR. While market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop, the progress has been uneven and there can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely accepted and used across market segments and financial products in a timely manner or that any other alternative reference rate will be developed. Any disruption in the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR or another alternate reference rate could result in increased financial, operational, legal, reputational or compliance risks. We are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR may have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about the replacement of LIBOR.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related developments have created substantial economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties as well as significant operational changes, which could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic, and governmental and public actions taken in response (such as stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business closures), have reduced economic activity and created substantial uncertainty about the future economic environment. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the long-term effect that the COVID-19 pandemic may have and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the pandemic, including the depth of the economic downturn and the timing and shape of the economic recovery, is highly uncertain. This could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Prolonged periods of significant economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, may lead to an increased risk of credit losses, in particular due to decreases in the value of our mortgage loans held for portfolio or collateral securing our Advances or due to member financial difficulties or member failures, and may lead to an increased risk of counterparty defaults. The risk of credit losses may be exacerbated by a prolonged downturn in the residential and commercial real estate markets, including higher mortgage defaults or delinquencies due to rising unemployment and the effect of mortgage forbearance and other relief as well as financial difficulties or failures of mortgage servicers.

Additionally, a prolonged economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to further reduced demand for Advances. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, demand for Advances decreased significantly as a number of emergency actions taken by the Federal Reserve helped facilitate liquidity and support stability in the fixed-income markets and as members experienced substantial deposit growth. We believe that reduced demand for Advances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the near future.

Overall, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to, and may continue to cause, compression in our net interest income and net interest margin. To the extent interest rates continue to be low, or negative interest rates arise, our business and profitability may be further adversely affected.

Furthermore, stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business shutdowns as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to substantial changes in normal business practices, such as the implementation of widespread work-from-home arrangements for us, as well as many of our members, dealers, investors, and third-party service providers. These changes have increased the risk of operational errors, disruptions and failures, and cybersecurity breaches. It is uncertain when and in what manner normal business operations may return, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct and manage our business.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations will depend on many factors that remain highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including, but not limited to:
21

the duration, spread, and severity of the pandemic; additional fiscal stimulus and other measures taken in response to the pandemic; the actions taken to contain the pandemic, including the effectiveness of related vaccines and therapeutics; and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume.

Potential GSE reform could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

Due to our GSE status, the ultimate resolution to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could affect the FHLBanks. While there appears to be consensus that a permanent financial and political solution to the current conservatorship status should be implemented, which could include maintaining the current structure, no consensus has evolved to date around any of the various legislative proposals. Some policy proposals directed towards Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have included provisions applicable to the FHLBank System, such as limitations on Advances and portfolio investments. Other proposals have included broader changes in GSE mortgage finance, such as the FHLBank System being a greater participant in the secondary mortgage market, which could affect the FHLBank System's long-standing business model.

There are significant differences between the FHLBank System and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including the System's focus on lending as opposed to guaranteeing mortgages and its distinctive cooperative business model. GSE legislation could inadequately account for these differences. This could jeopardize the ability of the FHLBank System to continue operating effectively within its current business model, including by adversely changing the perceptions of the capital markets about the risk associated with the debt of housing GSEs. We cannot predict the effects on the System if GSE reform were to be enacted.


FHLB Regulatory Environment.Changes in the regulatory and legislative environment could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition to potential GSE reform, the legislative and regulatory environment in which the System operates continues to undergo change. Recently-promulgated and future legislative and regulatory actions could significantly affect our business model, financial condition, or results of operations. Legislative and regulatory actions have also raised our operating costs and imparted added uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. We are unable at this time to predict the ultimate effects the regulatory environment could have on the FHLBank System's business model, our members' view on the value of the FHLBank membership, or on our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements mandated by Finance Agency regulations and supervisory guidance and by our internal policies, or not being able to pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock, may lower demand for Mission Asset Activity, harm results of operations, and lower membership value.
Liquidity
To ensure safe and sound operations, we must hold a minimum amount of capital relative to our asset levels. We must also hold a sufficient amount of retained earnings to help protect members' capital stock investment against impairment risk. If our capital levels fall significantly, we may be unable to pay dividends or redeem and repurchase capital stock in a timely manner (or at all). Such events could adversely affect the value of membership including causing impairment in the value of members' capital investment in our company. Outcomes could be: reduced demand for Mission Asset Activity, decreased profitability, requests from members to redeem a portion of their capital or to withdraw from membership, or increased investors' perception of the riskiness of our FHLB.


MARKET AND LIQUIDITY RISK

Changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds (together referred to as market risk exposure or interest rate risk exposure) could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Exposure of earnings to unhedged changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds is one of our largest ongoing residual risks. We derive most of our income from the interest earned on assets less the interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits used to fund the assets. Spreads on our assets tend to be narrow compared to those of many other financial institutions due to our cooperative business model. Market Access.conditions, yield curve shape, competitive forces, and market risk exposure could cause these already narrow asset spreads to decline, which could substantially reduce our
22

profitability. A key spread relationship is that we tend to utilize Consolidated Discount Notes to fund a significant amount of assets that have adjustable-rates tied to a benchmark interest rate, such as LIBOR or SOFR. Because rates on Discount Notes do not perfectly correlate with other adjustable benchmark interest rates, a narrowing of this spread, for example from investors changing perceptions about the quality of our debt, could lower income and reduce balances of Mission Asset Activity.

We hedge mortgage assets with a combination of Consolidated Obligations and derivatives transactions. Interest rate movements can lower profitability in two primary ways: 1) directly due to their impact on earnings from cash flow mismatches between assets and liabilities; and 2) indirectly via their impact on prepayment speeds on our MBS investments and mortgages purchased under our MPP, which can unfavorably affect the cash flow mismatches. The effects on income can also include acceleration in the amortization of purchased premiums on mortgage assets.

Because it is normally cost-prohibitive to completely mitigate market risk exposure, a residual amount of market risk normally remains after incorporating risk management activities. Sharp increases or decreases in interest rates could adversely affect us and our stockholders by making dividend rates less competitive relative to the returns available to members on alternative investments.

In some extremely stressful scenarios, changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds could result in dividends being below stockholders' expectations for an extended period of time and/or market capitalization ratios falling below par which could indicate potential impairment of member stock. In such a situation, members could engage in less Mission Asset Activity and could request a withdrawal of capital. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about market risk exposure.

Impaired access to the capital markets for debt issuance could decrease the amount of Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings by raising debt costs and, at the extreme, prevent the System from meeting its financial obligations.

Our principal long-term source of funding, liquidity, and market risk management is through access on favorable terms to the capital markets for participation in the issuances of debt securities and execution of derivative transactions at prices and yields that are adequate to support our business model. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of Consolidated Obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, particularly the short-term capital markets, because we and the System normally have a large reliance on short-term funding. The System's strong debt ratings, the implicit U.S. government backing of our debt, strong investor demand for FHLBank System debt, and effective funding management are instrumental in ensuring satisfactory access to the capital markets.

We are exposed to liquidity risk if significant disruptions in the capital markets occur. Although the System was able to maintain access to the capital markets for debt issuances on acceptable terms during 2019,2020, there is no assurance this will continue to be the case. Future ability to effectively access the capital markets on acceptable terms could be adversely affected by external events (such as general economic and financial instabilities, political instability, wars, natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies)emergencies, civil unrest or other unanticipated or catastrophic events), deterioration in the perception of financial market participants about the financial strength of Consolidated Obligations, or downgrades to the System's credit ratings. The System could also be affected by the continued changes in the capital markets in response to financial regulations and by the joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, which exposes the System as a whole to events at individual FHLBanks. If access to capital markets were to be impaired for an extended period, the effect on our financial condition and results of operations could be material. At the extreme, the System's ability to achieve its mission and satisfy its financial obligations could be threatened.

Credit and Counterparty Risk.
CREDIT RISK

We are exposed to credit risk that, if realized, could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We believe we have a de minimis overall amount of residual credit risk exposure related to Credit Services, purchases of investments, and transactions in derivatives, and a minimal amount of credit risk exposure related to the MPP. However, we can make no assurances that credit losses could not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations in all scenarios. An extremely severe and prolonged economic downturn, especially if combined with continued significant disruptions in housing or mortgage markets, could result in credit losses on assets that could impair our financial condition or results
23


The FHLB is an asset-based lender for Advances and Letters of Credit. Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and we have a perfected first lien position on collateral. However, we do not have full information on the characteristics of, nor do we estimate current market values on, a large portion of collateral. This results in a degree of uncertainty as to the precise amount of over-collateralization.

Our MPP consists of mortgage loans considered to have high credit quality and conservative underwriting and loan characteristics with additional credit enhancements in place designed to protect us against credit losses. The result has been a minimal amount of credit losses historically.

Although Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and mortgage loans in the MPP are of high credit quality with various credit enhancements, credit risk could increase under a number adverse scenarios, such as damage or destruction of collateral that members pledge to secure Advances or mortgages that we hold in the MPP as a result of natural disasters, which may be caused by the effects of climate change or other catastrophic events. Significant declines in the value of collateral pledged to secure Advances could lead to greater exposure to credit losses in the MPP have historically been minimal, they could increase under adverse economic scenarios involvingevent of a member default. Additionally, significant and sustained reductions in home prices and sustained elevated levels of unemployment and other factors that influence delinquencies and defaults.defaults could increase the risk of credit losses in the MPP.

Some of our liquidity investments are unsecured, as are uncollateralized portions of certain derivatives. We make unsecured liquidity investments in and transact derivatives with highly rated, investment-grade institutions, have conservative limits on dollar and maturity exposure to each institution, and have strong credit underwriting practices. Failure of an investment or derivative counterparty with which we have a large unsecured position could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations. To the extent we engage in derivative transactions

required to be cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), we may be exposed to nonperformance from central clearinghouses and Futures Commission Merchants.

Financial institutions are increasingly inter-related as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. As a result, actual or potential defaults of one or more financial institutions could lead to market-wide disruptions making it difficult for us to find qualified counterparties for transactions.

Market Risk. Changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds (together referred to as market risk exposure or interest rate risk exposure) could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Exposure of earnings to unhedged changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds is one of our largest ongoing residual risks. We derive most of our income from the interest earned on assets less the interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits used to fund the assets. We hedge mortgage assets with a combination of Consolidated Obligations and derivatives transactions. Interest rate movements can lower profitability in two primary ways: 1) directly due to their impact on earnings from cash flow mismatches between assets and liabilities; and 2) indirectly via their impact on prepayment speeds on our MBS investments and mortgages purchased under our MPP, which can unfavorably affect the cash flow mismatches. The effects on income can also include acceleration in the amortization of purchased premiums on mortgage assets.

Because it is normally cost-prohibitive to completely mitigate market risk exposure, a residual amount of market risk normally remains after incorporating risk management activities. Sharp increases or decreases in interest rates could adversely affect us and our stockholders by making dividend rates less competitive relative to the returns available to members on alternative investments.

In some extremely stressful scenarios, changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds could result in dividends being below stockholders' expectations for an extended period of time and/or market capitalization ratios falling below par which could indicate potential impairment of member stock. In such a situation, members could engage in less Mission Asset Activity and could request a withdrawal of capital. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about market risk exposure.

Asset Profitability. Spreads on assets to funding costs may narrow because of changes in other risk factors such as the economy, interest rates, and competition, resulting in lower profitability.

Spreads on our assets tend to be narrow compared to those of many other financial institutions due to our cooperative business model. Market conditions, yield curve shape, competitive forces, and, as discussed above, market risk exposure could cause these already narrow asset spreads to decline, which could substantially reduce our profitability. A key spread relationship is that we tend to utilize Consolidated Discount Notes to fund a significant amount of assets that have adjustable-rates tied to a benchmark interest rate, such as LIBOR or SOFR. Because rates on Discount Notes do not perfectly correlate with other adjustable benchmark interest rates, a narrowing of this spread, for example from investors changing perceptions about the quality of our debt, could lower income and reduce balances of Mission Asset Activity.

Capital Adequacy. Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements mandated by Finance Agency regulations and supervisory guidance and by our internal policies, or not being able to pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock, may lower demand for Mission Asset Activity, harm results of operations, and lower membership value.

To ensure safe and sound operations, we must hold a minimum amount of capital relative to our asset levels. We must also hold a sufficient amount of retained earnings to help protect members' capital stock investment against impairment risk. If our capital levels fall significantly, we may be unable to pay dividends or redeem and repurchase capital stock in a timely manner (or at all). Such events could adversely affect the value of membership including causing impairment in the value of members' capital investment in our company. Outcomes could be reduced demand for Mission Asset Activity, decreased profitability, requests from members to redeem a portion of their capital or to withdraw from membership, or increased investors' perception of the riskiness of our FHLB.


LIBOR Replacement. Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021 it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. In response, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) to 1) develop a robust alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR and 2) develop a plan to encourage its use in derivatives and other transactions as appropriate. The ARRC has settled on the establishment of SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018. As of December 31, 2019, a portion of our assets and liabilities remain indexed to LIBOR. There is no assurance that LIBOR will continue to be generally accepted or used by the financial markets through 2021, even if LIBOR continues to be available.

In September 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter providing LIBOR transition guidance. Under the supervisory letter, the FHLBanks were directed, by December 31, 2019, to cease purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021, and, by March 31, 2020, to no longer enter into any other new LIBOR referenced financial assets, liabilities and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021. Except for investments and option embedded products, the ability to enter into new LIBOR referenced transactions has been extended to June 30, 2020. As a result of the limitations introduced by the Finance Agency, we may experience less flexibility in our access to funding, higher funding costs, lower overall demand or increased costs of Advances, and a lack of suitable investment alternatives. Accordingly, the composition of our balance sheet, capital stock level, primary mission assets ratio and net income may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the limitations within the supervisory letter may impact our ability to manage interest-rate risk, which may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

During the market transition away from LIBOR, LIBOR may experience increased volatility, and the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may also experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR. While market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop, there can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely accepted and used across market segments and financial products in a timely manner or that any other alternative reference rate will be developed. Any disruption in the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR or another alternate reference rate could result in increased financial, operational, legal, reputational or compliance risks. We are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR may have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about the replacement of LIBOR.

Exposure to Other FHLBanks.Financial difficulties at other FHLBanks could require us to provide financial assistance to another FHLBank, which could adversely affect our results of operations or our financial condition.

Each FHLBank has a joint and several liability for principal and interest payments on Consolidated Obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Although no FHLBank has ever defaulted on its principal or interest share of an Obligation, there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the case. Financial performance issues could require our FHLB to provide financial assistance to one or more other FHLBanks, for example, by making a payment on an Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank. Such assistance could adversely affect our financial condition, earnings, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Exposure to the Office of Finance.
OPERATIONAL RISK

Failures of the Office of Finance could disrupt the ability to conduct and manage our business.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of Consolidated Obligations, among other things. Pursuant to Finance Agency regulations, the Office of Finance, often in conjunction with the FHLBanks, has adopted policies and procedures for the purposes of facilitating and approving the issuance of Consolidation Obligations. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's services as a result of breaches, cyberattacks, or technological risks could negatively affect the business operations of each FHLBank, including disruptions to the FHLBanks' access to funding through the sale of Consolidated Obligations. Although the Office of Finance has business continuity and security incident response plans in place, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted or otherwise negatively affected if the Office of Finance was not able to perform its functions for a period of time.


24

Operational and Compliance Risks.Table of Contents
Failures or interruptions in our internal controls, compliance activities, information systems and other technologies, financial and business models, and third-party vendors could harm our financial condition, results of operations, reputation, and relations with members.


Control failures, including failures in our internal controls overAs a financial reporting as well as business interruptions with members and counterparties, could occur from human error, fraud, breakdowns in information and computer systems, errors or misuse of financial and business models and servicesinstitution, we employ (including third-party vendor services), lapses in operating processes, or natural or man-made disasters. If a significant control failure or business interruption were to occur, it could materially damage our financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to foresee, prevent, mitigate, reverse or repair the negative effects of such failures or interruptions.

We rely heavily on internal and third-party information systems and other technology to manage our business, including the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential borrower and otherfinancial information in computer systems and networks. For instance, due to our reliance on the book-entry system of the Federal Reserve Banks for debt issuance and servicing operations, we depend on them and their fiscal agent, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and one or more settlement agents to issue and make payments of principal and interest on Consolidated Obligations. Failures in information systems and other technologies could occur from human error, fraud, cyberattacks, errors or misuse of models and services we employ, lapses in operating processes, or natural or man-made disasters.

Computer systems, software and networks canmay be increasingly vulnerable to failures and interruptions includingfrom cyberattacks, which may include breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious or destructive code (such as ransomware) and other events against information owned by our company and customers. These failures and interruptions could jeopardize the confidentiality or integrity of information, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. Additionally, threats of cyber terrorism, external extremist parties, including state-sponsored actors, result in heightened risk exposure. The techniques used in cyber attacks change frequently and have grown increasingly sophisticated, and these attacks or ensuing security breaches could persist for an extended period of time before being detected. It could take considerable additional time for us to determine the scope, extent, amount, and type of information compromised. We can make no assurance that we will be able to prevent, timely and adequately address, or mitigate failures, interruptions, or cyberattacks in information systems and other technology. If we experience a failure, interruption, or cyberattack in any of these systems, we may be unable to effectively conduct or manage business activities, operating processes, and risk management, which could significantly harm customer relations, our reputation, and operating costs, potentially resulting in material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to foresee, prevent, mitigate, reverse or repair the negative effects of such failures, interruptions, cyberattacks, or cyber terrorism.
Personnel Risk.
Our financial condition and results of operations could suffer if we are unable to hire and retain skilled key personnel.


We rely on key personnel for many of our functions and have a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of our business. The success of our mission depends, in large part, on the ability to attract and retain key personnel. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate a qualified and diverse pool of employees, both to maintain our current business, and to execute strategic initiatives. Competition for qualified people or ineffective succession planning could affect the ability to hire or retain effective key personnel, thereby harming our financial condition and results of operations.


Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.        Properties.

Our primary offices are located in approximately 79,000 square feet of leased space in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio. We also maintain a leased, fully functioning, back-up facility in suburban Cincinnati. We believe that our facilities are in good condition, well maintained, and adequate for our current needs.

Item 3.        Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

25



PART II


Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

By law our stock is not publicly traded, and only our members (and former members with a withdrawal notice pending) may own our stock. The par value of our capital stock is $100 per share. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had 666649 member and former member stockholders and approximately 3427 million shares of capital stock outstanding, all of which were Class B Stock.

We paiddeclared quarterly cash dividends in 2020 and 2019 and 2018 as outlinedshown in the table below.
(Dollars in millions)            
  2019   2018
    Annualized       Annualized  
Quarter Amount Rate Form Quarter Amount Rate Form
First $65
 6.00% Cash First $61
 5.75% Cash
Second 58
 5.50
 Cash Second 62
 5.75
 Cash
Third 45
 4.50
 Cash Third 68
 6.00
 Cash
Fourth 37
 4.00
 Cash Fourth 65
 6.00
 Cash
Total $205
 5.05
   Total $256
 5.88
  
(Dollars in millions)
20202019
AnnualizedAnnualized
QuarterRateRate
First2.50 %6.00 %
Second2.50 5.50 
Third2.00 4.50 
Fourth2.00 4.00 
Total2.23 5.05 

Generally, the Board of Directors has discretion to declare or not declare dividends and to determine the rate of any dividend declared. Our policy states that dividends for a quarter are declared and paid from retained earnings after the close of a calendar quarter and are based on average stock balances for the then closed quarter. The Board of Directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by the financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings of the FHLB, and actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment including interest rates and the mortgage and credit markets. The dividend rate is generally referenced as a spread to average short-term interest rates experienced during the quarter to help assess a competitive level for our stockholders.

A Finance Agency rule prohibits us from issuing new excess capital stock to members, either by paying stock dividends or otherwise, if before or after the issuance the amount of member excess capital stock exceeds or would exceed one percent of the FHLB's assets. Excess capital stock for this regulatory purpose is calculated as the aggregate of capital stock owned that is in excess of all membership and Mission Asset Activity requirements (as defined in our Capital Plan). At December 31, 2019, we had excess capital stock outstanding totaling less than one percent of total assets.

We may not declare a dividend if, at the time, we are not in compliance with all of our capital requirements. We also may not declare or pay a dividend if, after distributing the dividend, we would fail to meet any of our capital requirements or if we determine that the dividend would create a safety and soundness issue for the FHLB. See Note 1511 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding our capital stock.



RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

From time to time, weWe provide Letters of Credit in the ordinary course of business to support members' obligations issued in support of unaffiliated, third-party offerings of notes, bonds or other securities. We provided $3$1 million and $12$3 million of such credit support during 20192020 and 2017.2019. We did not provide such credit support during 2018. To the extent that these Letters of Credit are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, their issuance is exempt from registration pursuant to section 3(a)(2) thereof.


26
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents selected Statement of Condition data, Statement of Income data and financial ratios for the five years ended December 31, 2019.2020.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)20202019201820172016
STATEMENT OF CONDITION DATA AT PERIOD END:
Total assets$65,296 $93,492 $99,203 $106,895 $104,635 
Advances25,362 47,370 54,822 69,918 69,882 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio9,549 11,236 10,502 9,682 9,150 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans (1)
— 
Investments (2)
27,041 34,389 33,614 27,058 25,334 
Consolidated Obligations, net:
Discount Notes27,500 49,084 46,944 46,211 44,690 
Bonds31,997 38,440 45,659 54,163 53,191 
Total Consolidated Obligations, net59,497 87,524 92,603 100,374 97,881 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock19 22 23 30 35 
Capital:
Capital stock - putable2,641 3,367 4,320 4,241 4,157 
Retained earnings1,304 1,094 1,023 940 834 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(15)(16)(13)(16)(13)
Total capital3,930 4,445 5,330 5,165 4,978 
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
Net interest income$406 $406 $499 $429 $363 
Non-interest income (loss)(7)(10)(37)(1)46 
Non-interest expense92 89 85 79 111 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 35 30 
Net income$276 $276 $339 $314 $268 
FINANCIAL RATIOS:
Dividend payout ratio (3)
30.3 %74.1 %75.6 %66.3 %63.9 %
Weighted average dividend rate (4)
2.23 5.05 5.88 5.00 4.00 
Return on average equity5.78 5.65 6.29 6.15 5.35 
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.25 
Net interest margin (5)
0.46 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.35 
Average equity to average assets5.39 5.04 5.11 5.00 4.76 
Regulatory capital ratio (6)
6.07 4.79 5.41 4.88 4.80 
Operating expenses to average assets (7)
0.080 0.070 0.063 0.060 0.061 
(1)The methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans changed on January 1, 2020 with the adoption of new accounting guidance on the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the prior periods have not been revised to conform to the new basis of accounting.
(2)Investments include interest-bearing deposits in banks, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.
(3)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared in the period as a percentage of net income.
(4)Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid divided by the average number of shares of capital stock eligible for dividends.
(5)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
(6)Regulatory capital ratio is period-end regulatory capital (capital stock, mandatorily redeemable capital stock and retained earnings) as a percentage of period-end total assets.
(7)Operating expenses comprise compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, which are included in non-interest expense.

27
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
STATEMENT OF CONDITION DATA AT PERIOD END:         
Total assets$93,492
 $99,203
 $106,895
 $104,635
 $118,756
Advances47,370
 54,822
 69,918
 69,882
 73,292
Mortgage loans held for portfolio11,236
 10,502
 9,682
 9,150
 7,954
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans1
 1
 1
 1
 2
Investments (1)
34,389
 33,614
 27,058
 25,334
 37,356
Consolidated Obligations, net:         
Discount Notes49,084
 46,944
 46,211
 44,690
 77,199
Bonds38,440
 45,659
 54,163
 53,191
 35,092
Total Consolidated Obligations, net87,524
 92,603
 100,374
 97,881
 112,291
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock22
 23
 30
 35
 38
Capital:         
Capital stock - putable3,367
 4,320
 4,241
 4,157
 4,429
Retained earnings1,094
 1,023
 940
 834
 737
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(16) (13) (16) (13) (13)
Total capital4,445
 5,330
 5,165
 4,978
 5,153
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:         
Net interest income$406
 $499
 $429
 $363
 $327
Non-interest income (loss)(10) (37) (1) 46
 30
Non-interest expense89
 85
 79
 111
 75
Affordable Housing Program assessments31
 38
 35
 30
 28
Net income$276
 $339
 $314
 $268
 $254
FINANCIAL RATIOS:         
Dividend payout ratio (2)
74.1% 75.6% 66.3% 63.9% 67.7%
Weighted average dividend rate (3)
5.05
 5.88
 5.00
 4.00
 4.00
Return on average equity5.65
 6.29
 6.15
 5.35
 5.04
Return on average assets0.28
 0.32
 0.31
 0.25
 0.24
Net interest margin (4)
0.42
 0.47
 0.42
 0.35
 0.31
Average equity to average assets5.04
 5.11
 5.00
 4.76
 4.78
Regulatory capital ratio (5)
4.79
 5.41
 4.88
 4.80
 4.38
Operating expenses to average assets (6)
0.070
 0.063
 0.060
 0.061
 0.054
(1)Investments include interest-bearing deposits in banks, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.
(2)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared in the period as a percentage of net income.
(3)Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid divided by the average number of shares of capital stock eligible for dividends.
(4)Net interest margin is net interest income before provision/(reversal) for credit losses as a percentage of average earning assets.
(5)Regulatory capital ratio is period-end regulatory capital (capital stock, mandatorily redeemable capital stock and retained earnings) as a percentage of period-end total assets.
(6)Operating expenses comprise compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, which are included in non-interest expense.


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

.

This discussion and analysis of the FHLB's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K.


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Financial Condition

Mission Asset ActivityRecent Developments
In
2019,
COVID-19 Pandemic
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has impacted communities and businesses worldwide, including those in the FHLB fulfilled itsFifth District. The effects of COVID-19 continue to evolve, and the full impact and duration of the virus are unknown. Despite the uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic, we continued to fulfill our mission byof providing robust access to a key source of readily available and competitively priced wholesale funding to its member financial institutions and supporting itsour commitment to affordable housing and community investment, while maintaining strong capital and paying stockholders a competitive dividend return on their capital investment.liquidity positions.

We have remained focused on the health and safety of our employees while maintaining full business operations. Employees are working from home with only a limited number of employees voluntarily working from our downtown Cincinnati location. Although there is no definitive date on when employees will return to the office, we have prepared health and safety policies and procedures to ensure our employees are able to return safely.

At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate impact of COVID-19 on our members, counterparties, vendors, and other third parties we rely upon to conduct our business. However, we continue to monitor the progression of COVID-19 and are committed to assisting members and their communities as impacts related to the pandemic continue to unfold.

Financial Condition

Mission Asset Activity
Mission Assets, which we define as Advances, Letters of Credit, and total MPP are the primary means by which we fulfill our mission with direct connections to members. We regularly monitor our balance sheet concentration of Mission Asset Activity. One measure we use to assess mission achievement is our Primary Mission Asset ratio, which measures the sum of average Advances and mortgage loans as a percentage of average Consolidated Obligations (adjusted for certain high-quality liquid assets, as permitted by regulation). In 2019,2020, the Primary Mission Asset ratio averaged slightly over 6975 percent, just belowwhich exceeded the Finance Agency's preferred ratio of 70 percent. In assessing overall mission achievement, we also consider supplemental sources of Mission Asset Activity, the most significant of which is Letters of Credit issued to members.

The following table summarizes our Mission Asset Activity.
Year Ended December 31,
 Ending BalancesAverage Balances
(In millions)2020201920202019
Mission Asset Activity:
Advances (principal)$25,007 $47,264 $42,917 $47,894 
MPP:  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (principal)9,316 10,981 10,995 10,499 
Mandatory Delivery Contracts (notional)137 936 338 516 
Total MPP9,453 11,917 11,333 11,015 
Letters of Credit (notional)28,812 16,205 20,141 15,150 
Total Mission Asset Activity$63,272 $75,386 $74,391 $74,059 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Ending Balances Average Balances
(In millions)2019 2018 2019 2018
Mission Asset Activity:       
Advances (principal)$47,264
 $54,872
 $47,894
 $65,593
Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP):       
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (principal)10,981
 10,272
 10,499
 9,743
Mandatory Delivery Contracts (notional)936
 146
 516
 287
Total MPP11,917
 10,418
 11,015
 10,030
Letters of Credit (notional)16,205
 14,847
 15,150
 14,619
Total Mission Asset Activity$75,386
 $80,137
 $74,059
 $90,242


At December 31, 2020, 64 percent of members held Mission Asset Activity, which was relatively stable compared to prior periods. The balance of Mission Asset Activity was $75.4$63.3 billion at December 31, 2019,2020, a decrease of $4.8$12.1 billion (six(16 percent) from year-end 2018,2019, which was primarily driven by lower Advance balances. Advance principal balances decreased $7.6 $22.3
28

billion (14(47 percent) from year-end 2018. Average Advance principal balances for 2019 declined $17.7 billion compared to 2018 primarily due to a reductionreduced borrowings by large-asset members as these members generally experienced an inflow of deposits on their balance sheets and increased access to other sources of liquidity in borrowingsthe financial markets. The decrease in the balance of Mission Asset Activity was partially offset by an increase of $12.6 billion (78 percent) in Letters of Credit balances from a few large-asset members.year-end 2019. The increase in Letters of Credit was due in part to members using Letters of Credit rather than securities to secure increased deposits from states and municipalities during the pandemic. We normally earn fees on Letters of Credit based on the actual average amount of the Letters utilized, which generally is less than the notional amount issued.

Average principal Advance balances for 2020 decreased only $5.0 billion (10 percent) compared to 2019 as Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the first quarter as the financial markets reacted to the pandemic. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the end of the third quarter of 2020. Advance balances are often volatile due to members' ability to quickly, normally on the same day, increase or decrease their amount of Advances. We believe providing members flexibility in their funding levels helps support their asset-liability management needs and is a key benefit of membership. At December 31, 2019, 67 percent of members held Mission Asset Activity, which was relatively stable compared to prior periods.

As in recent years, most members continued to have modestWe believe that reduced demand for Advance borrowings. Based onAdvances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the most-recently available figures, members funded an average of 2.7 percent of their assetsnear future. Our business is designed to support significant changes in asset levels without having to undergo material changes in staffing, operations, risk practices, or general resource needs. A key reason for this scalability is that our Capital Plan provides for additional capital when Advances grow and the opportunity for us to retire capital when Advances decline, thereby acting, along with Advances.our efficient operating expenses, to preserve competitive profitability.

The MPP principal balance rose $0.7fell $1.7 billion (seven(15 percent) from year-end 2018.2019. During 2019,2020, we purchased $2.6 billion of mortgage loans, while principal reductions totaled $1.9 billion.

of $4.3 billion reflected the significant increase in mortgage loan refinance activity in 2020.

Based on earnings in 2019,2020, we accrued $31 million for the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) pool of funds to be available to members in 2020.2021. In addition to the required AHP assessment, we continued ourprovided voluntary sponsorship of twothree other housing

programs which provide resourcesduring 2020. These programs provided funds to pay forcover accessibility rehabilitation and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners, funds for the replacement or repair of homes damaged or destroyed by natural disasters within the Fifth District, and to help members aid their communities following natural disasters.Advances at zero percent interest for COVID-19 related assistance.

Investments
The balance of investments at December 31, 20192020 was $34.4$27.0 billion, an increasea decrease of $0.8$7.3 billion (two percent) from year-end 2018.2019. At December 31, 2019,2020, investments included $13.5$9.7 billion of MBS and $20.9$17.3 billion of other investments, which consisted primarily of highly-rated short-term instruments and longer-term U.S. Treasury and GSE obligations held for liquidity. All of our MBS held at December 31, 20192020 were issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or a U.S. agency. The decline in the balance of investments at the end of 2020 was due to decreases in both MBS and liquidity investments. MBS balances declined due to an increase in prepayments of the underlying mortgages as a result of the low interest rate environment. Due to regulatory limitations regarding the purchase of MBS that reference LIBOR, we have not been able to fully replace the prepaid MBS with suitable alternatives. Liquidity investments decreased as we decided to hold more of our liquidity portfolio as deposits at the Federal Reserve at the end of 2020 in anticipation of volatile market conditions. At December 31, 2020, we held $3.0 billion in deposits at the Federal Reserve, which are reflected in cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition.

Investments averaged $37.8$32.9 billion in 2019, an increase2020, a decrease of $8.0$4.9 billion (27(13 percent) from year-end 2019. The decrease in average investments was primarily driven by the average balance during 2018. We increased investmentsdecrease in order to hold more asset liquidity, which we obtained primarily by purchasing U.S. Treasury obligations as part of our plan to manage the implementation of the Finance Agency's Advisory Bulletin on the maintenance of sufficient liquidity. In addition, liquidityMBS balances described above. Liquidity investments can vary significantly on a daily basis during times of volatility in Advance balances. We maintained a robust amount of asset liquidity throughout 20192020 across a variety of liquidity measures, as discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management."

Capital
Capital adequacy surpassed all minimum regulatory capital requirements in 2019.2020. The GAAP capital-to-assets ratio at December 31, 20192020 was 4.756.02 percent, while the regulatory capital-to-assets ratio was 4.796.07 percent. Both ratios exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. Regulatory capital includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock accounted for as a liability under GAAP. Both GAAP and regulatory capital both decreased $0.9$0.5 billion in 2019,2020, primarily due to ourthe repurchase of over $1.5$2.3 billion inof excess stock from members. These repurchasesand members' redemption of $0.6 billion of stock in 2020. The repurchase and redemption of capital stock were in responsepartially offset by members' purchases of capital stock to support Advance growth at the decrease in Advances in 2019.end of the first quarter. Retained earnings totaled $1.1$1.3 billion at December 31, 2019,2020, an increase of seven percent$0.2 billion (19 percent) from year-end 2018.2019, which is a higher growth rate relative to recent years. The decreasesincrease in GAAP and regulatory capital were partially offset by purchasesretained earnings was due in part to the lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020.
29


Results of Operations

Overall Results
The table below summarizes our results of operations.
 Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017
Net income$276
 $339
 $314
Affordable Housing Program assessments31
 38
 35
Return on average equity (ROE)5.65% 6.29% 6.15%
Return on average assets0.28
 0.32
 0.31
Weighted average dividend rate5.05
 5.88
 5.00
Average 3-month LIBOR2.33
 2.31
 1.26
ROE spread to 3-month LIBOR3.32
 3.98
 4.89
Dividend rate spread to 3-month LIBOR2.72
 3.57
 3.74

Net income in 2019 decreased $63 million (19 percent) compared to 2018. Net income was lower primarily due to a decline in spreads earned on Advances and a decrease in Advance balances. However, the lower net income was partially offset by increases in the fair values of certain derivatives and other financial instruments carried at fair value.

Despite the reduction in net income,Our earnings levels continued to represent competitive returns on stockholders' capital investment. ROE was higher than short-term rates in the periods presented above, while we maintained risk exposures in line with our appetite for a moderate risk profile. The spread between ROE and short-term rates, such as 3-month LIBOR, is a market benchmark we believe member stockholders actively use to assess the competitiveness of the return on their capital investment.

In December 2019, we paid stockholders a quarterly 4.00 percent annualized dividend rate on their capital investment in our company. The lower weighted average dividend rate in 2019 compared to 2018 was in part due to the decline in the interest rate environment over the last several quarters.

We believe that our operations and financial condition will continue to generate competitive profitability over time, reflectingreflect the combination of a stable business model and conservative management of risk. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in Mission Asset Activity because we can execute commensurate changes in liability and capital stock balances. Key factors that can cause significant periodic volatility in our profitability are changes in the level of interest rates, changes in spreads between benchmark interest rates and our short-term funding costs, recognition of net amortization due to accelerated prepayments of mortgage assets, and fair value adjustments related to the use of derivatives and the associated hedged items. The table below summarizes our results of operations.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)202020192018
Net income$276 $276 $339 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 
Return on average equity (ROE)5.78 %5.65 %6.29 %
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 
Weighted average dividend rate2.23 5.05 5.88 
Average short-term interest rates (1)
0.51 2.24 2.07 
ROE spread to average short-term interest rates5.27 3.41 4.22 
Dividend rate spread to average short-term interest rates1.72 2.81 3.81 
(1)     Average short-term interest rates consist of 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate.

The historically low interest rate environment in 2020 had a significant impact on earnings. Low long-term interest rates resulted in a higher volume of mortgage refinance activity, which led to elevated levels of mortgage loan repayments and related premium amortization. Additionally, short-term interest rates declined sharply in early 2020 and continued at low levels for the remainder of the year, which lowered the earnings generated from investing our capital. Despite these declines, 2020 net income benefited from gains on the sale of interest rate swaptions during the first quarter of 2020 as well as higher prepayment fees on Advances in 2020. We use swaptions to hedge market risk exposure associated with holding fixed-rate mortgage assets and may sell swaptions as interest rates change in order to offset actual and anticipated risks.

Earnings levels continued to represent competitive returns on stockholders' capital investment. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in assets because we can execute commensurate changes in liability and capital stock balances. ROE was higher than average short-term rates in the periods presented above, while we maintained risk exposures in line with our appetite for a moderate risk profile. The spread between ROE and average short-term rates, which we compute using 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate, is a market benchmark we believe member stockholders actively use to assess the competitiveness of the return on their capital investment.

In December 2020, we paid stockholders a quarterly dividend at a 2.00 percent annualized rate on their capital investment in our company, which is 1.84 percentage points above fourth quarter average short-term interest rates. The lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020 was due to the uncertainty surrounding the economic effects from the COVID-19 pandemic and its ultimate impact on our business and profitability, and to grow retained earnings to bolster the capital position going forward.

30

Effect of Interest Rate Environment
Trends in market interest rates and the resulting shapes of the market yield curves strongly influence the results of operations and profitability because of how they affect members' demand for Mission Asset Activity, spreads on assets, funding costs and decisions in managing the tradeoffs in our market risk/return profile. The following table presents key market interest rates (obtained from Bloomberg L.P.).
Year 2020Year 2019Year 2018
Year 2019 Year 2018 Year 2017 EndingAverageEndingAverageEndingAverage
Ending Average Ending Average Ending Average
Federal funds effective1.55% 2.16% 2.40% 1.83% 1.33% 1.00%Federal funds effective0.09 %0.37 %1.55 %2.16 %2.40 %1.83 %
SOFR1.55
 2.20
 3.00
 1.85
 1.47
 0.90
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)0.09 0.37 1.55 2.20 3.00 1.85 
3-month LIBOR1.91
 2.33
 2.81
 2.31
 1.69
 1.26
3-month LIBOR0.24 0.65 1.91 2.33 2.81 2.31 
2-year LIBOR1.70
 2.03
 2.66
 2.75
 2.08
 1.65
2-year LIBOR0.20 0.49 1.70 2.03 2.66 2.75 
10-year LIBOR1.90
 2.09
 2.71
 2.95
 2.40
 2.29
10-year LIBOR0.93 0.88 1.90 2.09 2.71 2.95 
2-year U.S. Treasury1.57
 1.97
 2.49
 2.52
 1.89
 1.39
2-year U.S. Treasury0.12 0.39 1.57 1.97 2.49 2.52 
10-year U.S. Treasury1.92
 2.14
 2.69
 2.91
 2.41
 2.33
10-year U.S. Treasury0.92 0.89 1.92 2.14 2.69 2.91 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.28
 2.52
 3.06
 3.20
 2.52
 2.40
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
0.65 1.17 2.28 2.52 3.06 3.20 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.71
 2.95
 3.51
 3.65
 3.00
 3.03
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.28 1.64 2.71 2.95 3.51 3.65 

 Year 2020 by Quarter - Average
 Quarter 1Quarter 2Quarter 3Quarter 4
Federal funds effective1.25 %0.06 %0.09 %0.09 %
SOFR1.25 0.05 0.09 0.09 
3-month LIBOR1.54 0.61 0.25 0.22 
2-year LIBOR1.18 0.32 0.22 0.23 
10-year LIBOR1.34 0.69 0.65 0.87 
2-year U.S. Treasury1.10 0.19 0.14 0.15 
10-year U.S. Treasury1.38 0.68 0.65 0.86 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.86 1.09 0.86 0.88 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.31 1.58 1.32 1.37 
(1)     Simple average of current coupon rates of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac par MBS indications.
 Year 2019 by Quarter - Average
 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
Federal funds effective2.40% 2.40% 2.19% 1.65%
SOFR2.44
 2.43
 2.26
 1.66
3-month LIBOR2.69
 2.51
 2.20
 1.93
2-year LIBOR2.62
 2.20
 1.70
 1.63
10-year LIBOR2.67
 2.30
 1.70
 1.72
2-year U.S. Treasury2.49
 2.13
 1.69
 1.59
10-year U.S. Treasury2.65
 2.33
 1.79
 1.79
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.97
 2.63
 2.22
 2.27
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
3.41
 3.07
 2.62
 2.70
(1)Simple average of current coupon rates of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac par MBS indications.

The target overnight Federal funds rate was in the range of zero to 0.25 percent at December 31, 2020, a decrease from the range of 1.50 to 1.75 percent at December 31, 2019, a decrease from the range of 2.25 to 2.50 percent at December 31, 2018. In March 2020, the Federal Reserve first decreased the target Federal funds2019. The low interest rate to a range of 1.00 to 1.25 percent and then subsequently decreased the target to a range of zero to 0.25 percent due toenvironment reflects the evolving risks to economic activity from the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19).COVID-19 pandemic.

Average overnightshort-term rates (i.e., federal funds effective and SOFR) were still approximately 0.35 percentage170 to 180 basis points higherlower in 20192020 compared to 2018, while average 3-month LIBOR was relatively flat2019 and average long-term rates decreased by approximately 0.65125 to 0.85 percentage135 basis points during that same period. The higherdecline in interest rates on overnight assets continued to benefitnegatively impacted income in 20192020 primarily because of the lower earnings generated by funding assets with interest-free capital. Both short-termfrom investing capital and long-term interest rates trended downward throughout the second halfincreased mortgage asset prepayments resulting in higher net amortization of 2019. By the end of 2019, the trend of higher short-term interest rates with lower long-term rates experienced in the first three quarters no longer existed. In addition, for much of 2019, the market yield curves were relatively flat, and at certain maturity points inverted, which lowered profitability.premiums on those assets.


Business Outlook and Risk Management

This section summarizes the business outlook and what we believe are our current major risk exposures. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a detailed discussion of certain factors that could affect our corporate objectives, financial condition, and results of operations. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" provides details on current risk exposures.

Recent Developments
Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19):The recent outbreak of COVID-19, which has now spread globally, including within the United States, has resulted in the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The effects of COVID-19 are rapidly evolving, and the full impact and duration of the virus are unknown. Managing COVID-19 has strained and is expected to severely tax healthcare systems and businesses worldwide. The effects of COVID-19 and the response to the virus have negatively impacted financial markets and overall economic conditions. We have employees who are not operationally critical working remotely, and have implemented a split location model for critical staff in our downtown Cincinnati location and our back-up facility.

Strategic/Business Risk
Advances: Our business is cyclical and Mission Asset Activity normally grows slowly or stabilizesdeclines in periods of moderate macro-economic growth,economic contraction, when financial institutions have ample liquidity, or when there is significant growth in the money supply. Other factors that constrain widespread demand for Advances are the low levels of interest rates and competitiveness of Advances relative to deposits and other sources of wholesale funding.

In the last several years, the percentage of assets that members funded with Advances has shown little variation, in the range of two to four percent. We may see a broad-based increase in Advance demand if one or more of the following occur: aggregate
31

Table of Contents
loan portfolios of our members grow quicker than aggregate deposits, interest rates begin to increase over time, or changes in Federal Reserve policy reduce other sources of liquidity available to members.

MPP: MPP balances are influenced by conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, the competitivenesscompetitiveness of prices we offer to purchase loans as well as program features, and activity from our largest sellers.

Our ongoing strategy for the MPP has two components: 1) increase the number of regular sellers and participants in the program; and 2) manage purchases and balances at a prudent level relative to capital and total assets to effectively manage market and credit risks consistent with our risk appetite.

Market Risk
During 2019,2020, as in 2018,2019, the market risk exposure to changing interest rates was moderate overall and well within policy limits. We believe that longer-term profitability would not become uncompetitive unless interest rates were to change quickly and significantly. In the short-term, profitability could become uncompetitive if long-term interest rates decrease more than 100in excess of 50 basis points leading to faster prepayments of mortgage assets, which would further accelerate the recognition of purchased premiums.

Capital Adequacy
We believe members place a high value on their capital investment in our company. Capital ratios at December 31, 2019,2020, and all throughout the year, exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. We believe the amount of retained earnings is sufficient to protect against members' impairment risk of their capital stock investment in the FHLB and to provide the opportunity to stabilize or increase future dividends. Our capital policies and Capital Plan also have safeguards to ensure we meet regulatory and prudential capital requirements.

Credit Risk
In 2019,2020, we continued to maintain a de minimis level of overall residual credit risk exposure from our Credit Services, investments, and derivative transactions. We believe policies and procedures related to credit underwriting, Advance collateral management, and transactions with investment and derivative counterparties continue to mitigate these risks. We have never experienced any credit losses, and we continue to have no loan loss reserves or impairment recorded for these instruments. Residual credit risk exposure in the mortgage loan portfolio was minimal. The allowance for credit losses in the MPP was stable during the year and was $1 million at December 31, 2019.

Liquidity Risk
Our liquidity position remained strong during 2019,2020, as did our overall ability to fund operations through the issuance of Consolidated Obligations at acceptable interest costs. Investor demand for FHLBank System debt continued to be robust. There

were no substantive stresses on market access or liquidity from external market and political events. Although we can make no assurances, we believe there is only a remote possibility of a liquidity or funding crisis in the System that could impair our ability to participate, on a cost-effective basis, in issuances of new debt, service outstanding debt, maintain adequate capital levels, or pay competitive dividends.

Regulatory and Legislative Risk and Significant Developments
General: The FHLBank System is subject to legislative and regulatory oversight. Legislative and regulatory actions applicable, directly or indirectly, to the FHLBank System in the last decade have increased uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. This is due primarily to the uncertainty around potential future GSE reform, and the evolution of mortgage financing moving towards financial institutions currently not eligible for FHLBank membership. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for more discussion. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of GSE reform and whether our membership base will be legislatively and regulatorily permitted to evolve in concert with the housing finance market.

LIBOR Replacement; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Brokered Deposits Restrictions:On January 22, 2021, the FDIC published a final rule, effective April 1, 2021, that amends its brokered deposits regulations that apply to less than well-capitalized insured depository institutions. The FDIC stated that the amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations and they establish a new framework for analyzing the deposit broker definition, which determines whether deposits placed through deposit placement arrangements qualify as brokered deposits. These deposit placement arrangements include those between insured depository institutions and third parties, such as financial technology companies, for a variety of business purposes, including access to deposits. The amendments to the FDIC's brokered deposit regulations, among other things, clarify what it means to be engaged in the business of facilitating the placement of deposits and expand the scope of the primary purpose exception. The rule amendments are expected to have the effect of narrowing the definition of deposit broker and excluding more deposits from treatment as brokered deposits. The amendments also establish an application and reporting
32

Table of Contents
process with respect to the primary purpose exception for businesses that do not meet one of several bright-line tests, and they affirm the FDIC’s position that the brokering of certificates of deposit constitutes deposit brokering.

This rule may have an effect on member demand for certain Advances, but we cannot predict the extent of the impact. We do not expect this rule to materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Housing Goals Amendments:On June 25, 2020, the Finance Agency published a final rule, effective August 24, 2020, amending the FHLBank housing goals regulation. Enforcement of the final rule will phase in over three years. The final rule eliminated the existing $2.5 billion volume threshold, such that all FHLBanks are subject to a new housing goal, regardless of their mortgage purchase volume. The new housing goal establishes one overall target level requiring 20 percent of an FHLBank's total mortgage purchases to be home-purchase mortgages for low- and very-low income families and low-income areas as well as refinancing mortgages for low-income families. The final rule also establishes a separate small member participation housing goal with a target level of 50 percent. The final rule provides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of the goals. We do not believe these changes will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Supervisory Letter:Letter - Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans as Collateral for FHLBank Advances:On April 23, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter (PPP Supervisory Letter) permitting the FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral for Advances as “Agency Securities,” given the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 100 percent guarantee of the unpaid principal balance. On April 20, 2020, the SBA's third interim final rule related to PPP loans was published. The rule explicitly waived certain regulatory requirements that must be satisfied before a member could pledge PPP loans to the FHLBanks as collateral. The PPP Supervisory Letter establishes a series of conditions under which the FHLBanks may accept PPP loans as collateral that focus on the financial condition of members, collateral discounts, and pledge dollar limits. On December 27, 2020, the President signed into law an extension of the PPP until March 21, 2021. The April 23, 2020 Supervisory Letter from the Finance Agency allowing us to accept PPP loans as collateral remains in effect.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act:The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The $2.2 trillion package was the largest stimulus bill in United States history. The CARES Act is in addition to previous relief legislation passed by Congress in March 2020. The legislation provides the following:
Assistance to businesses, states, and municipalities.
A loan program for small businesses, non-profits and physician practices that can be forgiven through employee retention incentives.
Treasury Secretary authority to make loans or loan guarantees to states, municipalities, and eligible businesses and loosens some regulations imposed through the Dodd-Frank Act.
Direct payments to eligible taxpayers and their families.
Expanded eligibility for unemployment insurance and payment amounts.
Mortgage forbearance provisions and a foreclosure moratorium.

Funding for the PPP, which was created by the CARES Act, was increased with the enactment of subsequent laws, most recently by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 27, 2020. Additional phases of the CARES Act or other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation may be enacted by Congress or other actions by the President, state governments, and governmental agencies. In connection with the foreclosure moratorium noted above, we have asked servicers of the mortgage loans we own to temporarily suspend all foreclosure sales and evictions, unless a home is vacant, in order to allow homeowners to stay in their homes during this period. We continue to monitor these actions and guidance as they evolve and to evaluate the potential impact to the U.S. economy; the impacts to mortgages held or serviced by our members that we accept as collateral; the impacts on our MPP portfolio; and the impacts to our overall business.

LIBOR Transition: We are planning for the replacement of LIBOR given the announcement that the LIBOR index is expectedFCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to be phased out by no later thansubmit rates for the endcalculation of 2021LIBOR and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's establishment ofYork has established SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR. In 2019, weLIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. The market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to participate in the FHLBank System's issuances ofdevelop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Bonds. At December 31, 2019, $10.9 billion (99 percent)Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk.

33

Table of Contents
As many of our adjustable-rate Consolidated Bonds wereassets and derivatives are still indexed to SOFR. We also continued to offer SOFR-linked AdvancesLIBOR, we have developed and began swapping certain instruments to adjustable-rates tied to SOFRimplemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and the overnight Federal funds effective rate in 2019. However, the majority of our variable-rate assets still remain indexed to LIBOR. Therefore, we are continuing to plan for the eventual replacement of our LIBOR-indexed instruments away from the LIBOR benchmark interest rate.balance sheet management. Part of our LIBOR transition plan includes havingour previously implemented fallback language for our LIBOR-indexed Advances and Consolidated Bonds in new and legacy contracts. As for our derivatives and investments that are tied to LIBOR, we are monitoring market-wide efforts to enhance fallback language for new activity and develop frameworks to address existing transactions. We are also evaluating the transition relief provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) concerning the accounting for contract modifications during the replacement of LIBOR.

On September 27, 2019,October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), published a Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol). Both the Supplement and the Protocol were effective on January 25, 2021. As of that date, all legacy bilateral derivatives transactions subject to Protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference a covered Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR), including U.S. dollar LIBOR, were effectively amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation. We have adhered to the Protocol and have worked with our counterparties, as necessary, to address over-the-counter derivative agreements referencing U.S. dollar LIBOR as a part of our LIBOR transition efforts.

The Finance Agency has also issued a Supervisory Letter - Planning for LIBOR Phase-Out (Supervisory Letter) to the FHLBanks that the Finance Agency stated issupervisory letters designed to ensure the FHLBanks will be able to identify and prudently manage the risks associated with the termination of LIBOR in a safe and sound manner. The Supervisory Letter provided thatAs of June 30, 2020, the FHLBanks should, by March 31, 2020,were required to cease entering into new LIBOR referencedLIBOR-based financial assets, liabilities, and derivatives with maturities beyondinstruments that mature after December 31, 2021, except for all product types except investments.investments and option embedded products. With respect to investments, the Supervisory LetterFinance Agency required the FHLBanks, by December 31, 2019, to stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. These phase-out dates dodid not apply to collateral accepted by the FHLBanks. The Supervisory Letter alsoAs directed by the Finance Agency, the FHLBanks to updatebegan requiring their pledged collateral certification reporting requirements by March 31, 2020 in an effort to encourage members to identifyreport levels of LIBOR-linked collateral maturing after December 31, 2021. The Finance Agency may permit certain exceptions to its Supervisory Letter because there may be LIBOR-linked products serving compelling mission, risk mitigating, and/or hedging purposes for the FHLBanks that do not currently have readily available alternatives.

As a result of the recent market conditions triggered in part by COVID-19, the FHLBanks' ability to enter into LIBOR-based instruments that mature after December 31, 2021 has been extended from March 31, 20202021. This will assist the FHLBanks in determining the level of member reliance on these assets to June 30, 2020, except for investmentssupport borrowings, make decisions about their future eligibility and option embedded products.the impact of any incremental haircuts and asset value deterioration on borrowing capacity.

We have Advances, investment securities Consolidated Bonds and derivatives with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. Each of these instruments are indexed to LIBOR settings that will no longer be provided after June 30, 2023, as noted above. The following table presents LIBOR-indexed Advances, investment securities Consolidated Bonds and derivatives by contractual maturity at December 31, 2019.2020.
(In millions)Maturing on or before June 30, 2023Maturing after June 30, 2023
LIBOR-Indexed Variable Rate Financial Instruments
Advances by redemption term$2,599 $3,012 
MBS by contractual maturity (1)
— 5,929 
Total principal amount$2,599 $8,941 
Derivatives, notional amount by termination date$9,339 $4,680 
(In millions)Maturing in 2020-2021 Maturing after 2021
LIBOR-Indexed Variable Rate Financial Instruments   
Advances by redemption term$6,906
 $3,524
MBS by contractual maturity (1)
266
 7,759
Consolidated Bonds by contractual maturity65
 
Total principal amount$7,237
 $11,283
Derivatives, notional amount by termination date$12,198
 $7,467
(1)MBS are presented by contractual maturity; however, their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

(1)MBS are presented by contractual maturity; however, their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

The market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR is expected to be gradual and complicated, including the possible development of term structures and credit adjustments to accommodate differences between LIBOR and SOFR. As such, we are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact of such a transition on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Acquired Member Assets Advisory Bulletin:Advisory Bulletin 2020-01 - Federal Home Loan Bank Risk Management of Acquired Member Assets (AMA). On January 31, 2020, the Finance Agency issued an Advisory Bulletin providing guidance on the risk management of acquired member assets, such as the MPP. The guidance includes expectations that an FHLBank will have Board-established limits on AMA portfolios and management-established thresholds to serve as monitoring tools to manage AMA-related risk exposure. The guidance provides that the board of an FHLBank should ensure that it serves as a liquidity source for members, while ensuring its portfolio limits do not result in the FHLBank’s acquisition of mortgages from smaller members being “crowded out” by the acquisition of mortgages from larger members. The Advisory Bulletin contains the expectation that the board of an FHLBank should set limits on the size and growth of portfolios and on acquisitions from a single participating financial institution. In addition, the guidance sets forth that the board of an FHLBank should consider concentration risk in the areas of geographic area, high-balance loans, and in third-party loan originations. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of this guidance, but currently do not expect it to materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.

34

Capital Stock Management Advisory Bulletin:Advisory Bulletin 2019-03 - Capital Stock Management. On August 14, 2019, the Finance Agency issued an Advisory Bulletin providing guidance that augments existing statutory and regulatory capital requirements to require each FHLBank to maintain at least a two percent ratioTable of capital stock to total assets. In February 2020, the Finance Agency began to consider the proportion of capital stock to assets, measured on a daily average basis at month end, when assessing each FHLBank’s capital management practices. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our capital management practices, financial condition, or results of operation.Contents

Final Rule on FHLBank Capital Requirements: On February 20, 2019, the Finance Agency published a final rule, effective January 1, 2020, that adopts, with amendments, the regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board (predecessor to the Finance Agency) (the Finance Board) pertaining to the capital requirements for the FHLBanks. The final rule carries over most of the prior Finance Board regulations without material change, but substantively revises the credit risk component of the risk-based capital requirement, as well as the limitations on extensions of unsecured credit. The main revisions remove requirements that we calculate credit risk capital charges and unsecured credit limits based on ratings issued by a NRSRO, and instead require that we establish and use our own internal rating methodology (which may include, but not solely rely on, NRSRO ratings). In addition, the rule imposes a new credit risk capital charge for cleared derivatives, revises the percentages used in the regulation’s tables to calculate credit risk capital charges for Advances and for non-mortgage assets and rescinds certain contingency liquidity requirements, as these requirements are now addressed in an Advisory Bulletin on FHLBank Liquidity Guidance issued by the Finance Agency in 2018. We do not expect this rule to materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.


ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Credit Services

Credit Activity and Advance Composition
The tablestable below showshows trends in Advance balances by major programs and in the notional amount of Letters of Credit.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Balance 
Percent(1)
 Balance 
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable Rate-Indexed:       Adjustable/Variable Rate-Indexed:    
LIBOR$10,430
 22% $28,740
 52%LIBOR$5,611 22 %$10,430 22 %
SOFR500
 1
 1,400
 3
SOFR118 500 
Other221
 1
 744
 1
Other82 — 221 
Total11,151
 24
 30,884
 56
Total5,811 23 11,151 24 
Fixed-Rate:       Fixed-Rate:    
Repurchase based (REPO)19,386
 41
 7,003
 13
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 19,386 41 
Regular Fixed-Rate11,476
 24
 10,972
 20
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 11,476 24 
Putable (2)
1,444
 3
 460
 1
Putable (2)
2,657 11 1,444 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,358
 5
 2,702
 5
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,358 
Other1,449
 3
 2,851
 5
Other1,151 1,449 
Total36,113
 76
 23,988
 44
Total19,196 77 36,113 76 
Total Advances Principal$47,264
 100% $54,872
 100%Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$47,264 100 %
       
Letters of Credit (notional)$16,205
   $14,847
  Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $16,205 
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020September 30, 2020June 30, 2020March 31, 2020
 Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable-Rate Indexed:  
LIBOR$5,611 22 %$5,846 22 %$21,071 44 %$28,889 36 %
SOFR118 116 — 116 — 2,000 
Other82 — 123 83 — 247 — 
Total5,811 23 6,085 23 21,270 44 31,136 39 
Fixed-Rate:  
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 3,896 15 8,978 18 28,058 35 
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 10,207 38 11,445 24 14,452 18 
Putable (2)
2,657 11 3,107 12 3,164 3,164 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,195 2,309 2,439 
Other1,151 1,158 1,241 680 
Total19,196 77 20,563 77 27,137 56 48,793 61 
Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$26,648 100 %$48,407 100 %$79,929 100 %
Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $23,011 $22,381 $15,785 
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019
 Balance 
Percent(1)
 Balance 
Percent(1)
 Balance 
Percent(1)
 Balance 
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable-Rate Indexed:               
LIBOR$10,430
 22% $13,604
 29% $16,127
 37% $20,462
 38%
SOFR500
 1
 1,050
 2
 1,050
 3
 1,400
 2
Other221
 1
 379
 1
 416
 1
 394
 1
Total11,151
 24
 15,033
 32
 17,593
 41
 22,256
 41
Fixed-Rate:               
REPO19,386
 41
 13,399
 29
 7,520
 17
 15,187
 28
Regular Fixed-Rate11,476
 24
 12,364
 27
 11,486
 27
 10,991
 20
Putable (2)
1,444
 3
 1,414
 3
 1,020
 3
 885
 1
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,358
 5
 2,583
 6
 2,646
 6
 2,753
 5
Other1,449
 3
 1,393
 3
 2,490
 6
 2,806
 5
Total36,113
 76
 31,153
 68
 25,162
 59
 32,622
 59
Total Advances Principal$47,264
 100% $46,186
 100% $42,755
 100% $54,878
 100%
                
Letters of Credit (notional)$16,205
   $16,090
   $15,697
   $13,812
  
(1)As a percentage of total Advances principal.    
(1)As a percentage of total Advances principal.    
(2)Excludes Putable Advances where the related put options have expired or where the Advance is indexed to a variable-rate. These Advances are classified based on their current terms.
(2)Excludes Putable Advances where the related put options have expired or where the Advance is indexed to a variable-rate. These Advances are classified based on their current terms.

Advance balances at December 31, 20192020 decreased 1447 percent compared to year-end 2018. Although a number of2019. Advance balances declined in 2020 as large-asset members increasedreduced their borrowings in 2019, aborrowings. The reduction in borrowings from onewas primarily driven by these members generally experiencing an inflow of our largest borrowers leddeposits on their balance sheets, while also having access to other liquidity sources as a result of certain government actions related to the net decreasepandemic. Despite the overall decline, Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the first quarter of 2020 as the financial markets reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic, and members
35

Table of Contents
turned to us for liquidity, primarily in the form of LIBOR and REPO Advances. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the end of 2020.


Advances. REPOs, which traditionally have the most volatile balances because a majority of them have overnight maturities, allow our members the most flexibility as their liquidity needs may change daily.

Housing and Community Investment
Our Housing and Community Investment Programs include the Affordable Housing Program and various housing and community economic development-related Advance Usageand grant programs. We fund the Affordable Housing Program with an accrual equal to 10 percent of our previous year's net earnings, mandated by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. See Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for a complete description of the Affordable Housing Program calculation.

The Affordable Housing Program provides funding for the development of affordable housing. The Program consists of a Competitive Program and a homeownership program called Welcome Home, which assists homebuyers with down payments and closing costs. Under the Competitive Program, we currently distribute funds in the form of grants to members that apply and successfully compete in an annual offering. Under Welcome Home, we make funds available beginning in March until they have been fully committed. For both programs, the income of qualifying individuals or households must be 80 percent or less of the area median income. We set aside up to 35 percent of the Affordable Housing Program accrual for Welcome Home and allocate the remainder to the Competitive Program.

Our Board of Directors also may allocate funds to voluntary housing programs. In 2020, the Board re-authorized an additional $2.0 million to the Carol M. Peterson Housing Fund for use during the year. These funds are primarily used as grants to pay for accessibility rehabilitation and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners. In 2012, the Board of Directors also established the Disaster Reconstruction Program, a voluntary housing program that provides grants for purchase or rehabilitation of a home within the Fifth District for residents that have suffered loss or damage to their primary residence as a result of a state or federally declared disaster. Since the program's inception, we have disbursed over $4.7 million to assist 378 households. Furthermore, in support of our members during the COVID-19 pandemic, we created a new Advance program that offered Advances with terms up to six months at zero percent interest to members between May 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. These Advances supported COVID-19 related assistance made by all Fifth District members. In 2020, we issued a total of $183 million of these Advances of which $34 million remained outstanding at December 31, 2020.

Two other housing programs that fall outside the auspices of the Affordable Housing Program are the Community Investment Program and the Economic Development Program. Advances under the former program have rates equal to our cost of funds, while Advances under the latter program have rates equal to our cost of funds plus reasonable administrative costs. Members use the Community Investment Program to serve housing needs of low- and moderate-income households and, under certain conditions, community economic development projects. The Economic Development Program is a discounted Advance program used to promote economic development and job creation and retention.

Investments
Types of Investments. A primary reason we hold investments is to carry sufficient asset liquidity. Permissible liquidity investments include Federal funds, certificates of deposit, bank notes, bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and debt securities issued by the U.S. government, its agencies, or other GSE's. The first five categories represent unsecured lending to private counterparties. We also may place deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. We are prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from investing (secured or unsecured) in financial investments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. Many liquidity investments have short-term maturities.

9

Table of Contents
Subject to regulatory limitations on purchases of new LIBOR-based investments, we are also permitted by regulation to purchase the following other investments, which have longer original maturities than liquidity investments:

MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations (together, referred to as MBS) issued by GSEs, other U.S. government agencies or private issuers;

asset-backed securities collateralized by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans issued by GSEs or private issuers; and

marketable direct obligations of certain government units and agencies (such as state housing finance agencies) that supply needed funding for housing or community lending and that do not exceed 20 percent of our regulatory capital.

We have never purchased asset-backed securities and do not own any privately-issued MBS.

Per Finance Agency regulations, the total investment in MBS and asset-backed securities may not exceed 300 percent of previous month-end regulatory capital on the day we purchase the securities. See the “Capital Resources” section below for the definition of regulatory capital.

Purposes of Having Investments. The investments portfolio helps achieve corporate objectives in the following ways:

Liquidity management. Liquidity investments support the ability to fund assets on a timely basis, especially Advances, and when it may be more difficult to issue new debt. These investments supply liquidity because we normally fund them with longer-term debt than asset maturities. We also may be able to obtain liquidity by selling certain investments for cash without a significant loss of value.

Earnings enhancement. The investments portfolio, especially MBS, assists with earning a competitive return on capital, and increasing funding for Housing and Community Investment programs. In addition, liquidity investments help stabilize earnings because they typically earn a relatively stable spread to the cost of debt issued to fund them.

Management of debt issuance. Maintaining a short-term liquidity investment portfolio can help us participate in attractively priced debt issuances, on an opportunistic basis. We can temporarily invest proceeds from debt issuances in short-term liquid assets and quickly access them to fund demand for Mission Asset Activity, rather than having debt issuances dictated solely by the timing of member demand.

Support of housing market. Investment in MBS and state housing finance agency bonds directly supports the residential mortgage market by providing capital and financing for mortgages.

How We Manage Risks of Investments. We strive to ensure our investment holdings have a moderate degree of market risk and limited credit risk, which tends to lower the returns we can expect to earn on these securities. We believe that a philosophy of purchasing investments with a high amount of market or credit risk would be inconsistent with our GSE status and corporate objectives.

Market risk associated with short-term investments tends to be minimal because of their short maturities and because we typically fund them with short-term Consolidated Obligations having similar maturities. We mitigate much of the market risk of MBS, which exists primarily from changes in mortgage prepayment speeds, by limiting their balances to 300 percent of regulatory capital and by funding them with a portfolio of long-term fixed-rate callable and non-callable Obligations. Additionally, we mitigate much of the market risk of longer-term non-MBS securities, and a portion of our MBS, by using interest rate swaps to effectively convert the fixed rate investments to adjustable-rate investments. We also manage the market risk exposure of the entire balance sheet within prudent policy limits.

Finance Agency regulations and internal policies also provide controls on market risk exposure by restricting the types of mortgage loans, MBS and other investments we can hold. These restrictions prohibit, among others, the purchase of interest only or principal only stripped MBS and MBS whose average life varies more than six years under a 300 basis points interest rate shock.

Our internal policies specify guidelines for, and relatively tight constraints on, the types and amounts of short-term investments we are permitted to hold and the maximum amount of credit risk exposure we are permitted to have with eligible counterparties. We are permitted to invest only in the instruments of counterparties with high credit ratings, and because of our conservative
10

Table of Contents
investment policies and practices, we believe all of our investments have high credit quality. We have never had a credit loss or credit-related write down of any investment security.

Deposits
We provide a variety of deposit programs, including demand, overnight, term and Federal funds, which enable depositors to invest funds in short-term liquid assets. We accept deposits from members, other FHLBanks, any institution to which we offer correspondent services, and other government instrumentalities. The rates of interest we pay on deposits are subject to change daily based on comparable money market interest rates. The balances in deposit programs tend to vary positively with the amount of idle funds members have available to invest, as well as the level of short-term interest rates. Deposits have typically represented one to two percent of our funding sources in recent years.

Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP or Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio)

Description of the MPP
Types of Loans and Benefits. Finance Agency regulations permit FHLBanks to purchase and hold specified whole mortgage loans from their members, which offers members a competitive alternative to the traditional secondary mortgage market and directly supports housing finance. We account for MPP loans as mortgage loans held for portfolio. By selling mortgage loans to us, members can increase their balance sheet liquidity and lower interest rate and mortgage prepayment risks. The MPP particularly enables small- and medium-sized community-based financial institutions to use their existing relationship with us to participate more effectively in the secondary mortgage market.

We purchase two types of mortgage loans: qualifying conforming fixed-rate conventional 1-4 family residential mortgages and residential mortgages fully insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Members approved to sell us these loans are referred to as Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs).

A “conventional” mortgage refers to a non-government-guaranteed mortgage. A “conforming” mortgage refers to the maximum amount permissible to be lent as a regular prime (i.e., non-jumbo, non-subprime) mortgage. For 2021, the Finance Agency established the conforming limit at $548,250 with loans originated in a limited number of high-cost cities and counties receiving higher conforming limits. We have elected not to purchase mortgages subject to these higher conforming limits.

Loan Purchase Process. A Master Commitment Contract is negotiated with each PFI, in which the PFI agrees to make a best efforts attempt to sell us a specific dollar amount of mortgage loans generally over a period of up to 12 months. We purchase loans pursuant to a Mandatory Delivery Contract, which is a legal commitment we make to purchase, and a PFI makes to deliver, a specified dollar amount of mortgage loans, with a forward settlement date, at a specified range of note rates and prices.

Shortly before delivering the loans that will fill the Mandatory Delivery Contract, the PFI must submit loan level detail including underwriting information. We apply procedures through an automated system designed to screen loans that do not comply with our policies. Our underwriting guidelines generally mirror those of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for conforming conventional loans, although our guidelines and pool composition requirements are more conservative in a number of ways in order to further limit credit risk exposure. PFIs are required to make certain representations and warranties against our underwriting guidelines on the loans they sell to us. If a PFI sells us a loan in breach of those representations and warranties, we have the contractual right to require the PFI to repurchase the loan.

How We Manage Risks of the MPP
Market Risk. We mitigate the MPP's market risk similarly to how we mitigate market risk from MBS.

Credit Risk - Conventional Mortgage Loans. A unique feature of the MPP is that it separates the various activities and risks associated with residential mortgage lending for conventional loans and allows these risks and activities to be taken on by different entities. We manage the market risk (including interest rate risk and prepayment risk) and liquidity risk. PFIs manage marketing, originating and, in most cases, servicing the loans. PFIs may either retain servicing or sell it to a qualified and approved third-party servicer (also referred to as a PFI). Because PFIs manage and bear most of the credit risk, they do not pay us a guarantee fee to transfer credit risk.

We manage credit risk exposure for conventional loans primarily through underwriting and pool composition requirements and by applying layered credit enhancements. These enhancements, which apply after a homeowner's equity is exhausted, include available primary mortgage insurance, the Lender Risk Account (discussed below), and Supplemental Mortgage Insurance. Supplemental Mortgage Insurance is applicable to loans acquired before February 2011 and was purchased by the PFI from one
11

Table of Contents
of our approved third-party providers naming us as the beneficiary. These credit enhancements are designed to protect us against credit losses in scenarios of severe downward movements in housing prices and unfavorable changes in other factors that can affect loan delinquencies and defaults.

The Lender Risk Account is a key component of how we manage residual credit risk. It is a holdback of a portion of the initial purchase price. Starting after five years from the loan purchase date, we may return the holdback to PFIs if they manage credit risk to pre-defined acceptable levels of exposure on the loan pools they sell to us. Actual loan losses are deducted from the amount of the purchase-price holdback we return to the PFI. The Lender Risk Account provides PFIs with a strong incentive to sell us high quality performing mortgage loans.

Credit Risk - FHA Mortgage Loans. Because the FHA makes an explicit guarantee on FHA loans, we do not require any credit enhancements on these loans beyond primary mortgage insurance.

"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides more detail on how we manage market and credit risks for the MPP.

Earnings from the MPP
The MPP enhances long-term profitability on a risk-adjusted basis and augments the return on member stockholders' capital investment. We generate earnings in the MPP from monthly interest payments minus the cost of funding and the cost of hedging the MPP's interest rate risk. Interest income on each loan is computed as the mortgage note rate multiplied by the loan's principal balance:

minus servicing costs (0.25 percent for conventional loans and 0.44 percent for FHA loans);
minus the cost of Supplemental Mortgage Insurance (for applicable loans); and
adjusted for the amortization of purchase premiums or the accretion of purchase discounts and for the amortization or accretion of fair value adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments.

For new loan purchases, we consider the cost of the Lender Risk Account when we set conventional loan prices and evaluate the MPP's potential return on investment. The pricing of each structure depends on a number of factors and is specific to the PFI and to the loan pool. We do not receive fees or income for retaining the risk of losses in excess of any credit enhancements.


FUNDING - CONSOLIDATED OBLIGATIONS

Our primary source of funding and hedging market risk exposure is through participation in the sale of Consolidated Obligation debt securities to global investors. Obligations are the joint and several obligations of all the FHLBanks, backed only by the financial resources of these institutions. There are two types of Consolidated Obligations: Consolidated Bonds (Bonds) and Consolidated Discount Notes (Discount Notes).

We participate in the issuance of Bonds for three purposes:

to finance and hedge intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate Advances and mortgage assets;
to finance and hedge short-term, adjustable-rate Advances, and swapped Advances, typically by synthetically transforming fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate funding through the execution of interest rate swaps; and
to acquire liquidity investments.

Bonds may have fixed or adjustable rates of interest. Fixed-rate Bonds are either non-callable or callable. A callable Bond is one that we are able to redeem in whole or in part at our discretion on one or more predetermined call dates according to the Bond's offering notice. The maturity of Bonds typically ranges from 1 year to 20 years. Adjustable-rate Bonds use a benchmark market interest rate, typically SOFR, for interest rate resets. We do not participate in the issuance of range Bonds, zero coupon Bonds, or indexed principal redemption Bonds.

We use fixed-rate Bonds to fund longer-term fixed-rate Advances and longer-term fixed-rate mortgage assets, and use adjustable-rate Bonds to fund adjustable-rate Advances and certain longer-term fixed rate investments that have been swapped to an adjustable-rate.

12

Table of Contents
We transact in interest rate swaps to synthetically convert some fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate terms. These are used to hedge adjustable-rate Advances.

We participate in the issuance of Discount Notes to fund short-term Advances, adjustable-rate Advances, putable Advances (which we normally swap to an adjustable-rate), liquidity investments, and a portion of longer-term fixed-rate assets. Discount Notes have maturities from one day to one year, with most of ours normally maturing within three months.

The mix of Obligations fluctuates in response to relative changes in short-term versus long-term assets, relative changes in fixed-rate versus adjustable-rate assets, decisions on market risk management (particularly the amount of funding of longer-term assets with short-term Obligations), and differences in relative costs of various Obligations.
Interest rates on Obligations are affected by a multitude of factors such as: overall economic and credit conditions; credit ratings of the FHLBank System; investor demand and preferences for our debt securities; the level of interest rates and the shape of the U.S. Treasury curve, the SOFR swap curve or LIBOR swap curve; and the supply, volume, timing, and characteristics of debt issuances by the FHLBanks, other GSEs, and other highly rated issuers.

Finance Agency regulations govern the issuance of Obligations. An FHLBank may not issue individual debt securities without Finance Agency approval, and we have never done so. The Office of Finance services Obligations, prepares the FHLBank System's quarterly and annual combined financial statements, and serves as a source of information for the FHLBanks on capital market developments.

We have the primary liability for our portion of Obligations, i.e., those issued on our behalf for which we received the proceeds. However, we also are jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Obligations. If we do not pay the principal or interest in full when due on any Obligation issued on our FHLB's behalf, we are prohibited from paying dividends or redeeming or repurchasing shares of capital stock. If another FHLBank were unable to repay its participation in an Obligation for which it is the primary obligor, the Finance Agency could call on each of the other FHLBanks to repay all or part of the Obligation. The Finance Agency has never invoked this authority.


LIQUIDITY

Our business requires a substantial and continual amount of liquidity to satisfy financial obligations (primarily maturing Consolidated Obligations) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and to provide members access to timely Advance funding and mortgage loan sales in all financial environments. We obtain liquidity by issuing debt, holding short-term assets that mature before their associated funding, and having the ability to sell certain investments without significant accounting or economic consequences. Sources of asset liquidity include cash, maturing Advances, maturing investments, principal paydowns of mortgage assets, the ability to sell certain investments, and interest payments received. Uses of liquidity primarily include repayments of Obligations, issuances of new Advances, purchases of loans under the MPP, purchases of investments, and payments of interest.

Liquidity requirements are significant because Advance balances can be volatile, many have short-term maturities, and we strive to allow members to borrow Advances on the same day they request them. We regularly monitor liquidity risks and the investment and cash resources available to meet liquidity needs, as well as statutory and regulatory liquidity requirements.

Because Obligations have favorable credit ratings and because the FHLBank System is one of the largest sellers of debt in the worldwide capital markets, the System historically has been able to satisfy its liquidity needs through debt issuance across a wide range of structures at relatively favorable spreads to benchmark market interest rates, such as U.S. Treasury securities.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Requirements

Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Under Finance Agency regulations, regulatory capital is composed of all capital stock (including stock classified as mandatorily redeemable), retained earnings, general loss allowances, and other amounts from sources the Finance Agency determines are available to absorb losses. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLB Act), permanent capital equals Class B stock plus retained earnings and is available to absorb financial losses.
13

Table of Contents

Finance Agency regulations stipulate that we must comply with three limits on capital leverage and risk-based capital. These ensure a low amount of capital risk while providing for competitive profitability. We have always complied with these regulatory capital requirements.

We must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. This requirement historically has been closest to affecting our operations.
We must maintain at least a five percent minimum leverage ratio of capital divided by total assets, which includes a 1.5 weighting factor applicable to permanent capital. Because all of our Class B stock is permanent capital, this requirement is met automatically if we satisfy the four percent unweighted capital requirement.
We are subject to a risk-based capital rule in which we must hold an amount of "permanent" capital that exceeds the amount of exposure to market risk, credit risk, and operational risk. How we determine the amount of these risk exposures is stipulated by Finance Agency regulation. Permanent capital includes retained earnings and the regulatory amount of Class B capital stock.

In addition to analyzing Advance balancesthe minimum capital requirements, the GLB Act and our Capital Plan promote the adequacy of our capital to absorb financial losses in three ways. These combine to give member stockholders a clear incentive to require us to minimize our risk profile:

the five-year redemption period for Class B stock;
the option we have to call on members to purchase additional capital if required to preserve safety and soundness; and
the limitations, described below, on our ability to honor requested redemptions of capital if we are at risk of not maintaining safe and sound operations.

In accordance with the GLB Act, our stock is also putable by dollar trends,members. There are statutory and regulatory restrictions on our obligation or right to redeem or repurchase outstanding stock, including, but not limited to, the following:

We may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, we monitorwould fail to satisfy any regulatory capital requirements. By law, we may not redeem any stock if we become undercapitalized.

We may not redeem any capital stock without approval of the degreeFinance Agency if either our Board of Directors or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred or are likely to which members use Advancesincur losses resulting or expected to fundresult in a charge against capital.

If we were to be liquidated, stockholders would be entitled to receive the par value of their balance sheets. The following table showscapital stock after payment in full to our creditors. In addition, each stockholder would be entitled to any retained earnings in an amount proportional to the unweighted, average ratiostockholder's share of the total shares of capital stock. In the event of a merger or consolidation of the FHLB, the Board of Directors would determine the rights and preferences of the FHLB's stockholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.

Capital Plan
Our Capital Plan ties the amount of each member's required capital stock to the amount of the member's assets and the amount and type of its Mission Asset Activity with us. The Capital Plan has the following basic characteristics:
14

Table of Contents

We offer only one class of capital stock, Class B, which is generally redeemable upon a member's five-year advance written notice. We strive to manage capital risks to be able to safely and soundly satisfy redemption requests sooner than five years, although we may elect to wait up to five years (or longer under certain conditions).

We issue shares of capital stock as required for an institution to become a member or maintain membership (membership stock), as required for members to capitalize Mission Asset Activity (activity stock), and if we pay dividends in the form of additional shares of stock.

We may, subject to the restrictions described above, repurchase certain capital stock (i.e., "excess" capital stock).

We believe the Capital Plan enables us to efficiently increase and decrease capital stock needed to capitalize assets in response to changes in the membership base and demand for Mission Asset Activity. This enables us to maintain a prudent amount of financial leverage and consistently generate a competitive dividend return.

At December 31, 2020, the amount of membership stock required for each member ranged from a minimum of $1,000 to a maximum of $30 million, with the amount within that range determined as a percentage of member assets. Separate from its membership stock, each member is required to purchase and hold activity stock to capitalize its Mission Asset Activity. For purposes of the Capital Plan, Mission Asset Activity includes the principal balance of Advances, guaranteed funds and rate Advance commitments, the principal balance of loans and commitments in the MPP, and beginning January 1, 2021, the notional balance of Letters of Credit.

The FHLB must capitalize its total assets at a rate of at least four percent. The Capital Plan supports the memberships' stock component towards this overall requirement. Each member is required to maintain an amount of activity stock within a range of a minimum and maximum percentage for each type of Mission Asset Activity. The Capital Plan amendment that went into effect on January 1, 2021 changed the activity percentages and set these minimums and maximums to be equal. As a result, the current percentages are as follows:
Mission Asset ActivityMinimum Activity PercentageMaximum Activity Percentage
Advances4.50%4.50%
Advance Commitments4.504.50
MPP3.003.00
Letters of Credit0.100.10
If a member owns more stock than is needed to satisfy both its most-recentlymembership stock requirement and the maximum activity stock percentages for its Mission Asset Activity, we designate the remaining stock as the member's excess capital stock. The member may utilize its excess stock to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity.

Prior to 2021, if an individual member's excess stock reached zero, the Capital Plan had permitted us, with certain limits, to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity of that member with excess stock owned by other members at the maximum percentage rate. This feature, called “cooperative capital,” enabled us to effectively utilize our excess capital stock holdings. However, with the most recently amended Capital Plan, by setting the minimum and maximum activity requirements to be equal, members are no longer able to utilize this cooperative capital for marginal new business.

Retained Earnings

Purposes and Amount of Retained Earnings
Retained earnings are important to protect members' capital stock investment against the risk of impairment and to enhance our ability to pay stable and competitive dividends when earnings may be volatile. Impairment risk is the risk that members would have to write down the par value of their capital stock investment in our FHLB as a result of their analysis of ultimate recoverability. An extreme situation of earnings instability, in which other-than-temporary losses were experienced and expected for a period of time, could result in members determining that the value of their capital stock investment was impaired.

We have a policy that sets forth a minimum amount of retained earnings we believe is needed to mitigate impairment risk and facilitate dividend stability in light of the risks we face. At December 31, 2020, the minimum retained earnings requirement was approximately $290 million, based on mitigating quantifiable risks under very stressed business and market scenarios to a 99
15

Table of Contents
percent confidence level. At the end of 2020, our retained earnings totaled $1.3 billion. We believe the current amount of retained earnings is fully sufficient to protect our capital stock against impairment risk and to provide for dividend stability.

Joint Capital Agreement to Augment Retained Earnings
The FHLBanks entered into a Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement (the “Capital Agreement”) in February 2011. The Capital Agreement provides that each FHLBank will, on a quarterly basis, allocate at least 20 percent of its net income to a restricted retained earnings account (the “Account”) until the balance of the Account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding Consolidated Obligations for the calendar quarter. The Account is not available figuresto be distributed as dividends except under certain limited circumstances. The Capital Agreement does not limit our ability to use retained earnings held outside of the Account to pay dividends. Although we have always maintained compliance with our capital requirements, we believe the Capital Agreement enhances risk mitigation by building a larger capital buffer over time to absorb unexpected losses, if any, that we may experience.


USE OF DERIVATIVES

Finance Agency regulations and our policies establish guidelines for totalthe execution and use of derivative transactions. We are prohibited from trading in, or the speculative use of, derivatives and have limits on the amount of credit risk to which we may be exposed. Most of our derivatives activity involves interest rate swaps, some of which may include options. We account for all derivatives at fair value.

Similar to our participation in debt issuances, use of derivatives is integral to hedging market risk created by Advances, certain longer-term fixed-rate investments and mortgage assets, including commitments. Derivatives related to Advances most commonly hedge either:

below-market rates and/or the market risk exposure on Putable Advances, and certain other Advances, for which members have sold us options embedded within the Advances; or

Regular Fixed-Rate Advances when it may not be as advantageous to issue Obligations or when it may improve our market risk management.

The derivatives we transact related to investments hedge market risk exposure by effectively converting the fixed-rate investment to an adjustable-rate investment. The derivatives we transact related to mortgage assets primarily hedge interest rate risk and prepayment risk. Such derivatives include options on interest rates swaps (swaptions) and sales of to-be-announced MBS for forward settlement.

Derivatives transactions related to Bonds help us intermediate between the preference of capital market investors for intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate debt securities and the preference of our members for shorter-term or adjustable-rate Advances. We can satisfy the preferences of both groups by issuing long-term fixed-rate Bonds and entering into an interest rate swap that synthetically converts the Bonds to an adjustable-rate funding basis that matches up with the short-term and adjustable-rate Advances, thereby preserving a favorable interest rate spread.

We may also transact derivatives to reduce the repricing risk of Discount Notes that fund certain overnight and shorter-term assets.

16

Table of Contents
 December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Average Advances-to-assets for members         
Assets less than $1.0 billion (542 members)2.55% 2.71% 2.67% 2.82% 3.05%
Assets over $1.0 billion (98 members)3.31
 3.87
 3.65
 3.67
 4.26
All members2.67
 2.88
 2.81
 2.94
 3.22
Use of derivatives can result in a substantial amount of volatility of accounting and economic earnings. We strive to maintain a low amount of earnings volatility from realized gains and losses on derivatives. We accept a higher amount of earnings volatility from unrealized gains and losses on recording derivatives at fair values, to the extent our use of derivatives effectively hedge market risk exposure.


COMPETITION

Advances
Members' demand for our Advances is affected by, among other things, the cost of other sources of funding available, including our members' customer deposits. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured, including the federal government, commercial banks, investment banking divisions of commercial banks, brokered deposits and other FHLBanks when our members' affiliated institutions are members of other FHLBanks. In addition, competition is often more significant when originating Advances to larger members, which have greater access to the national and global capital markets.

Our ability to compete successfully with other suppliers of wholesale funding, including other FHLBanks, depends primarily on the total cost of our products to members, which include the rates we charge, earnings and dividend performance, collateral policies, capital stock requirements, product features and members' perceptions of our relative safety and soundness. In addition, our competitive environment continues to be impacted by the Federal Reserve's low interest-rate environment and actions to provide liquidity in the financial markets. See Item 1A. Risk Factors below for further discussion.

Mortgage Purchase Program
The primary competitors for mortgage loans we purchase in the MPP are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), and other secondary mortgage market conduits. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in particular, have long-established and efficient programs and are the dominant purchasers of fixed-rate conventional mortgages. In addition, a number of private financial institutions have well-established securitization programs, although they may not currently be as active as they were historically. The MPP also competes with the Federal Reserve to the extent it purchases MBS and affects market prices and the availability of supply.

Debt Issuance
The FHLBank System primarily competes with the U.S. government and other GSEs for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs.


HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our human capital is a significant contributor to the success of our strategic business objectives. As such, we are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant operating environment changes, safety protocols and procedures that we determined were in the best interest of our employees and members, and which comply with government regulations. This includes having nearly all employees work remotely, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing any on-site work.

In managing human capital, we focus on our workforce profile and the various programs and philosophies described below.

Workforce Profile
Our workforce is primarily comprised of corporate employees, with one location of principal operations. As of December 31, 2020, we had 241 employees. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 37 percent of our workforce was female, 63 percent male, 85 percent non-minority and 15 percent minority. Our workforce is leanly staffed, and historically has included a number of longer-tenured employees. As of December 31, 2020, the average tenure of our employees was 10 years. We strive to both develop talent from within the organization and supplement with external hires. We believe that developing talent internally results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes loyalty and commitment in our employee base, which furthers our success. However, adding new employees contributes to new ideas, continuous improvement, and our goals of a diverse and inclusive workforce. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit.

Total Rewards
We seek to attract, develop and retain talented employees to achieve our strategic business initiatives, enhance business performance and provide members with financial services and a competitive return on their capital investment. We strive to
17

Table of Contents
achieve this objective through a combination of development programs, benefits and employee wellness programs, and recognizing and rewarding performance. Specifically, our programs include:
Cash compensation – provides competitive salary, transportation and other cash subsidies, and performance based incentives.
Benefits – offers health insurance with a health savings account contribution, dental and vision insurance, life and AD&D insurance, supplemental life insurance, long-term disability insurance, employee assistance program, 401(k) retirement savings plan with employer match, and defined benefit pension benefits.
Recognition programs – sponsors peer-to-peer recognition program, department recognition program and company-wide recognition.
Work / life balance – provides flexible scheduling and time off programs for vacation, illness, personal, holiday, bereavement, jury duty, and paid leave programs for times when caring for a sick family member, bonding with a newborn or recovering from childbirth.
Culture – promotes the five core values of dependable, customer focused, inclusive, change oriented and results driven and encourages employee resource groups and other culture and inclusion initiatives.
Development programs and training – offers tuition assistance programs, internal educational and development opportunities, and fee reimbursement for external educational and development programs.
Management succession planning – assesses talent annually with our leadership and Board of Directors with, at a minimum, a defined plan for positions at Vice President and above.

Diversity and Inclusion Program
Diversity and inclusion is a strategic business priority. Our diversity and inclusion officer reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as a liaison to the Board of Directors, and is a member of the senior management strategy council. We recognize that diversity increases capacity for innovation and creativity and that inclusion allows us to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthen retention efforts. We operationalize our commitment through the development and execution of a three-year diversity and inclusion strategic plan that includes quantifiable metrics to measure its success. Our diversity and inclusion officer and team reports regularly on performance against the strategic plan to management and the Board of Directors. We offer a range of opportunities for our employees to connect, and grow personally and professionally through employee resource groups and community outreach. We consider learning an important component of our diversity and inclusion strategic plan and regularly offer educational opportunities to our employees. Employee job descriptions contain inclusive behavior expectations that increase with increasing responsibilities in the organization, and also are included as part of our annual performance management process.
18

Table of Contents

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

The following discussion summarizes risks and uncertainties we currently face. The realization of one or more of the risks could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition, safety and soundness, and, at the extreme, the viability of our business franchise. The effects could include reductions in Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings and dividends, and, at the extreme, impairment of our capital or an inability to participate in issuances of Consolidated Obligations. The risks identified below are not the only risks we face. Other risks not presently known or which we deem to be currently immaterial may also impact our business. Additionally, the risks identified may adversely affect our business in ways we do not expect or anticipate.


BUSINESS AND REGULATORY RISK

A prolonged economic downturn could further lower Mission Asset Activity and profitability.

Member demand for Mission Asset Activity depends in large part on the general health of the economy and overall business conditions. Numerous external factors can affect our Mission Asset Activity and earnings including:

the general state and trends of the economy and financial institutions, especially in the Fifth District;
conditions in the financial, credit, mortgage, and housing markets;
interest rates;
actions of the Federal Reserve to affect liquidity reserves of financial institutions and the money supply;
competitive alternatives to our products, such as retail deposits and other sources of wholesale funding;
regulations affecting our members' liquidity requirements;
the willingness and ability of financial institutions to expand lending; and
natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies (see the separate Risk Factor on the COVID-19 pandemic), terrorist attacks, civil unrest, or other unanticipated or catastrophic events could create economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties.

These external factors, some of which were experienced in 2020, are likely to have a more severe impact if a prolonged economic downturn is accompanied by significant changes in interest rates, stresses in the housing market, elevated competitive forces, or actual or potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment. Any of these factors, or a combination of factors, could adversely affect our business activities and results of operations and may ultimately cause stockholders to request redemption of a portion of their capital or request withdrawal from membership (both referred to in this document as “request withdrawal of capital”).

For example, we believe overall Advance demand has been and continues to be unfavorably affected by the substantial amount of deposit-based liquidity provided to financial institutions through the monetary actions of the Federal Reserve and changes in our members' ability to manage their regulatory liquidity requirements. The Federal Reserve’s policies facilitate liquidity and support stability in the fixed-income markets, which in turn has generally led to substantial deposit growth for our members and decreases in their demand for Advances. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information on recent market activity.

The competitive environment for our products could adversely affect business activities, including decreasing the level and utilization rates of Mission Asset Activity, earnings, and capitalization.

Our primary business is providing liquidity to our members by making Advances to, and purchasing mortgage loans from, our members. Members have access to alternative funding sources, including their customers' deposits and wholesale funding, which may offer more favorable terms than we offer, such as lower rates or more flexible credit or collateral standards. Some of our competitors are not subject to the same body of regulations applicable to us, which enables those competitors to offer products and terms that we are not able to offer. In addition, state and federal regulators’ perception of the stability and reliability of our Advances can also directly impact the amount of Advances used by members.

19

Table of Contents
In connection with purchasing mortgage loans from our members, we face competition in the areas of customer service, purchase prices for the MPP loans and ancillary services such as automated underwriting and loan servicing options. Our primary competitors are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, government agencies such as Ginnie Mae, and other secondary mortgage market conduits. In addition, our members continue to face increased competition in mortgage origination from non-bank financial institutions that are not eligible for FHLBank membership, which could reduce the amount of mortgage loans that members can make available to us to purchase.

Increased competition could decrease the amount of Advances and mortgage loans and narrow profitability, both of which could cause stockholders to request withdrawals of capital and ultimately result in a failure to meet our capital adequacy requirements.

In addition, the FHLBank System's offerings of debt compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, other GSEs, and corporate, state, and sovereign entities, among others. Increases in the supply and types of competing debt products or other regulatory factors could adversely affect the System's ability to access funding or increase the cost of our debt issuance. Either of these effects could in turn adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of FHLB membership.

Sharp reductions in Mission Asset Activity resulting from lower usage by large members, consolidation of large members, or continued shift in mortgage lending activities towards entities not eligible for FHLB membership could adversely impact our net income and dividends.

The amount of Mission Asset Activity and capital is concentrated among a small number of our large members. Additionally, the financial industry continues to consolidate and in recent years there has been a systemic trend of financial institutions that are currently ineligible for FHLB membership gaining an increasing market share, especially related to mortgage finance. However, the legislative and regulatory environment faced by the FHLBanks has not changed in response to this trend. Our members could decrease their Mission Asset Activity and the amount of their capital stock as a result of merger and acquisition activity or continued loss of market share to ineligible entities. At December 31, 2020, one member, U.S. Bank, N.A., held over 15 percent of our Advances and one member PFI, Union Savings Bank, accounted for over 30 percent of the outstanding MPP principal balance. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in Mission Asset Activity because we can undertake commensurate reductions in liability balances and capital and because of our relatively modest operating expenses. However, an extremely large and sustained reduction in Mission Asset Activity could affect our profitability and ability to pay competitive dividends, as well as, at the FHLBank System level, raise policy questions about the relevance of the FHLBank System in its traditional mission of supporting housing finance.

Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021 it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. In response, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) to 1) develop a robust alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR and 2) develop a plan to encourage its use in derivatives and other transactions as appropriate. The ARRC has settled on the establishment of SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018 and since then, the market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk. As many of our assets and derivatives are indexed to LIBOR, we have developed and implemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and balance sheet management.

In September 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter providing LIBOR transition guidance. Under the supervisory letter, the FHLBanks were directed, by December 31, 2019, to cease purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021, and, by March 31, 2020, to no longer enter into any other new LIBOR
20

Table of Contents
referenced financial assets, liabilities and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021. Except for investments and option embedded products, the ability to enter into new LIBOR referenced transactions was extended to June 30, 2020. As a result of the limitations introduced by the Finance Agency, we may experience less flexibility in our access to funding, higher funding costs, increased basis risk, lower overall demand or increased costs of Advances, and a lack of suitable investment alternatives. Accordingly, the composition of our balance sheet, capital stock level, primary mission assets ratio and net income may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the limitations within the supervisory letter may impact our ability to manage interest-rate risk, which may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

During the market transition away from LIBOR, LIBOR may experience increased volatility, and the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may also experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR. While market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop, the progress has been uneven and there can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely accepted and used across market segments and financial products in a timely manner or that any other alternative reference rate will be developed. Any disruption in the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR or another alternate reference rate could result in increased financial, operational, legal, reputational or compliance risks. We are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR may have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about the replacement of LIBOR.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related developments have created substantial economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties as well as significant operational changes, which could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic, and governmental and public actions taken in response (such as stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business closures), have reduced economic activity and created substantial uncertainty about the future economic environment. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the long-term effect that the COVID-19 pandemic may have and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the pandemic, including the depth of the economic downturn and the timing and shape of the economic recovery, is highly uncertain. This could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Prolonged periods of significant economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, may lead to an increased risk of credit losses, in particular due to decreases in the value of our mortgage loans held for portfolio or collateral securing our Advances or due to member financial difficulties or member failures, and may lead to an increased risk of counterparty defaults. The risk of credit losses may be exacerbated by a prolonged downturn in the residential and commercial real estate markets, including higher mortgage defaults or delinquencies due to rising unemployment and the effect of mortgage forbearance and other relief as well as financial difficulties or failures of mortgage servicers.

Additionally, a prolonged economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to further reduced demand for Advances. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, demand for Advances decreased significantly as a number of emergency actions taken by the Federal Reserve helped facilitate liquidity and support stability in the fixed-income markets and as members experienced substantial deposit growth. We believe that reduced demand for Advances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the near future.

Overall, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to, and may continue to cause, compression in our net interest income and net interest margin. To the extent interest rates continue to be low, or negative interest rates arise, our business and profitability may be further adversely affected.

Furthermore, stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business shutdowns as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to substantial changes in normal business practices, such as the implementation of widespread work-from-home arrangements for us, as well as many of our members, dealers, investors, and third-party service providers. These changes have increased the risk of operational errors, disruptions and failures, and cybersecurity breaches. It is uncertain when and in what manner normal business operations may return, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct and manage our business.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations will depend on many factors that remain highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including, but not limited to:
21

Table of Contents
the duration, spread, and severity of the pandemic; additional fiscal stimulus and other measures taken in response to the pandemic; the actions taken to contain the pandemic, including the effectiveness of related vaccines and therapeutics; and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume.

Potential GSE reform could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

Due to our GSE status, the ultimate resolution to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could affect the FHLBanks. While there appears to be consensus that a permanent financial and political solution to the current conservatorship status should be implemented, which could include maintaining the current structure, no consensus has evolved to date around any of the various legislative proposals. Some policy proposals directed towards Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have included provisions applicable to the FHLBank System, such as limitations on Advances and portfolio investments. Other proposals have included broader changes in GSE mortgage finance, such as the FHLBank System being a greater participant in the secondary mortgage market, which could affect the FHLBank System's long-standing business model.

There are significant differences between the FHLBank System and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including the System's focus on lending as opposed to guaranteeing mortgages and its distinctive cooperative business model. GSE legislation could inadequately account for these differences. This could jeopardize the ability of the FHLBank System to continue operating effectively within its current business model, including by adversely changing the perceptions of the capital markets about the risk associated with the debt of housing GSEs. We cannot predict the effects on the System if GSE reform were to be enacted.

Changes in the regulatory and legislative environment could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition to potential GSE reform, the legislative and regulatory environment in which the System operates continues to undergo change. Recently-promulgated and future legislative and regulatory actions could significantly affect our business model, financial condition, or results of operations. Legislative and regulatory actions have also raised our operating costs and imparted added uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. We are unable at this time to predict the ultimate effects the regulatory environment could have on the FHLBank System's business model, our members' view on the value of the FHLBank membership, or on our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements mandated by Finance Agency regulations and supervisory guidance and by our internal policies, or not being able to pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock, may lower demand for Mission Asset Activity, harm results of operations, and lower membership value.

To ensure safe and sound operations, we must hold a minimum amount of capital relative to our asset levels. We must also hold a sufficient amount of retained earnings to help protect members' capital stock investment against impairment risk. If our capital levels fall significantly, we may be unable to pay dividends or redeem and repurchase capital stock in a timely manner (or at all). Such events could adversely affect the value of membership including causing impairment in the value of members' capital investment in our company. Outcomes could be: reduced demand for Mission Asset Activity, decreased profitability, requests from members to redeem a portion of their capital or to withdraw from membership, or increased investors' perception of the riskiness of our FHLB.


MARKET AND LIQUIDITY RISK

Changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds (together referred to as market risk exposure or interest rate risk exposure) could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Exposure of earnings to unhedged changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds is one of our largest ongoing residual risks. We derive most of our income from the interest earned on assets less the interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits used to fund the assets. Spreads on our assets tend to be narrow compared to those of many other financial institutions due to our cooperative business model. Market conditions, yield curve shape, competitive forces, and market risk exposure could cause these already narrow asset spreads to decline, which could substantially reduce our
22

Table of Contents
profitability. A key spread relationship is that we tend to utilize Consolidated Discount Notes to fund a significant amount of assets that have adjustable-rates tied to a benchmark interest rate, such as LIBOR or SOFR. Because rates on Discount Notes do not perfectly correlate with other adjustable benchmark interest rates, a narrowing of this spread, for example from investors changing perceptions about the quality of our debt, could lower income and reduce balances of Mission Asset Activity.

We hedge mortgage assets with a combination of Consolidated Obligations and derivatives transactions. Interest rate movements can lower profitability in two primary ways: 1) directly due to their impact on earnings from cash flow mismatches between assets and liabilities; and 2) indirectly via their impact on prepayment speeds on our MBS investments and mortgages purchased under our MPP, which can unfavorably affect the cash flow mismatches. The effects on income can also include acceleration in the amortization of purchased premiums on mortgage assets.

Because it is normally cost-prohibitive to completely mitigate market risk exposure, a residual amount of market risk normally remains after incorporating risk management activities. Sharp increases or decreases in interest rates could adversely affect us and our stockholders by making dividend rates less competitive relative to the returns available to members on alternative investments.

In some extremely stressful scenarios, changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds could result in dividends being below stockholders' expectations for an extended period of time and/or market capitalization ratios falling below par which could indicate potential impairment of member stock. In such a situation, members could engage in less Mission Asset Activity and could request a withdrawal of capital. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about market risk exposure.

Impaired access to the capital markets for debt issuance could decrease the amount of Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings by raising debt costs and, at the extreme, prevent the System from meeting its financial obligations.

Our principal long-term source of funding, liquidity, and market risk management is through access on favorable terms to the capital markets for participation in the issuances of debt securities and execution of derivative transactions at prices and yields that are adequate to support our business model. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of Consolidated Obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, particularly the short-term capital markets, because we and the System normally have a large reliance on short-term funding. The System's strong debt ratings, the implicit U.S. government backing of our debt, strong investor demand for FHLBank System debt, and effective funding management are instrumental in ensuring satisfactory access to the capital markets.

We are exposed to liquidity risk if significant disruptions in the capital markets occur. Although the System was able to maintain access to the capital markets for debt issuances on acceptable terms during 2020, there is no assurance this will continue to be the case. Future ability to effectively access the capital markets on acceptable terms could be adversely affected by external events (such as general economic and financial instabilities, political instability, wars, natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies, civil unrest or other unanticipated or catastrophic events), deterioration in the perception of financial market participants about the financial strength of Consolidated Obligations, or downgrades to the System's credit ratings. The System could also be affected by the continued changes in the capital markets in response to financial regulations and by the joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, which exposes the System as a whole to events at individual FHLBanks. If access to capital markets were to be impaired for an extended period, the effect on our financial condition and results of operations could be material. At the extreme, the System's ability to achieve its mission and satisfy its financial obligations could be threatened.


CREDIT RISK

We are exposed to credit risk that, if realized, could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We believe we have a de minimis overall amount of residual credit risk exposure related to Credit Services, purchases of investments, and transactions in derivatives, and a minimal amount of credit risk exposure related to the MPP. However, we can make no assurances that credit losses could not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations in all scenarios.
23

Table of Contents

The FHLB is an asset-based lender for Advances and Letters of Credit. Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and we have a perfected first lien position on collateral. However, we do not have full information on the characteristics of, nor do we estimate current market values on, a large portion of collateral. This results in a degree of uncertainty as to the precise amount of over-collateralization.

Our MPP consists of mortgage loans considered to have high credit quality and conservative underwriting and loan characteristics with additional credit enhancements in place designed to protect us against credit losses. The result has been a minimal amount of credit losses historically.

Although Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and mortgage loans in the MPP are of high credit quality with various credit enhancements, credit risk could increase under a number adverse scenarios, such as damage or destruction of collateral that members pledge to secure Advances or mortgages that we hold in the MPP as a result of natural disasters, which may be caused by the effects of climate change or other catastrophic events. Significant declines in the value of collateral pledged to secure Advances could lead to greater exposure to credit losses in the event of a member default. Additionally, significant and sustained reductions in home prices and sustained elevated levels of unemployment and other factors that influence delinquencies and defaults could increase the risk of credit losses in the MPP.

Some of our liquidity investments are unsecured, as are uncollateralized portions of certain derivatives. We make unsecured liquidity investments in and transact derivatives with highly rated, investment-grade institutions, have conservative limits on dollar and maturity exposure to each institution, and have strong credit underwriting practices. Failure of an investment or derivative counterparty with which we have a large unsecured position could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations. To the extent we engage in derivative transactions required to be cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), we may be exposed to nonperformance from central clearinghouses and Futures Commission Merchants.

Financial institutions are increasingly inter-related as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. As a result, actual or potential defaults of one or more financial institutions could lead to market-wide disruptions making it difficult for us to find qualified counterparties for transactions.

Financial difficulties at other FHLBanks could require us to provide financial assistance to another FHLBank, which could adversely affect our results of operations or our financial condition.

Each FHLBank has a joint and several liability for principal and interest payments on Consolidated Obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Although no FHLBank has ever defaulted on its principal or interest share of an Obligation, there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the case. Financial performance issues could require our FHLB to provide financial assistance to one or more other FHLBanks, for example, by making a payment on an Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank. Such assistance could adversely affect our financial condition, earnings, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock.


OPERATIONAL RISK

Failures of the Office of Finance could disrupt the ability to conduct and manage our business.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of Consolidated Obligations, among other things. Pursuant to Finance Agency regulations, the Office of Finance, often in conjunction with the FHLBanks, has adopted policies and procedures for the purposes of facilitating and approving the issuance of Consolidation Obligations. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's services as a result of breaches, cyberattacks, or technological risks could negatively affect the business operations of each FHLBank, including disruptions to the FHLBanks' access to funding through the sale of Consolidated Obligations. Although the Office of Finance has business continuity and security incident response plans in place, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted or otherwise negatively affected if the Office of Finance was not able to perform its functions for a period of time.

24

Table of Contents
Failures or interruptions in our information systems and other technologies, financial and business models, and third-party vendors could harm our financial condition, results of operations, reputation, and relations with members.

As a financial institution, we rely heavily on internal and third-party information systems and other technology to manage our business, including the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential borrower and financial information in computer systems and networks. For instance, due to our reliance on the book-entry system of the Federal Reserve Banks for debt issuance and servicing operations, we depend on them and their fiscal agent, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and one or more settlement agents to issue and make payments of principal and interest on Consolidated Obligations. Failures in information systems and other technologies could occur from human error, fraud, cyberattacks, errors or misuse of models and services we employ, lapses in operating processes, or natural or man-made disasters.

Computer systems, software and networks may be increasingly vulnerable to failures and interruptions from cyberattacks, which may include breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious or destructive code (such as ransomware) and other events against information owned by our company and customers. These failures and interruptions could jeopardize the confidentiality or integrity of information, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. Additionally, threats of cyber terrorism, external extremist parties, including state-sponsored actors, result in heightened risk exposure. The techniques used in cyber attacks change frequently and have grown increasingly sophisticated, and these attacks or ensuing security breaches could persist for an extended period of time before being detected. It could take considerable additional time for us to determine the scope, extent, amount, and type of information compromised. We can make no assurance that we will be able to prevent, timely and adequately address, or mitigate failures, interruptions, or cyberattacks in information systems and other technology. If we experience a failure, interruption, or cyberattack in any of these systems, we may be unable to effectively conduct or manage business activities, operating processes, and risk management, which could significantly harm customer relations, our reputation, and operating costs, potentially resulting in material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to foresee, prevent, mitigate, reverse or repair the negative effects of such failures, interruptions, cyberattacks, or cyber terrorism.

Our financial condition and results of operations could suffer if we are unable to hire and retain skilled key personnel.

We rely on key personnel for many of our functions and have a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of our business. The success of our mission depends, in large part, on the ability to attract and retain key personnel. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate a qualified and diverse pool of employees, both to maintain our current business, and to execute strategic initiatives. Competition for qualified people or ineffective succession planning could affect the ability to hire or retain effective key personnel, thereby harming our financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.Properties.

Our primary offices are located in approximately 79,000 square feet of leased space in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio. We also maintain a leased, fully functioning, back-up facility in suburban Cincinnati. We believe that our facilities are in good condition, well maintained, and adequate for our current needs.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.
25

Table of Contents

PART II


Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

By law our stock is not publicly traded, and only our members (and former members with a withdrawal notice pending) may own our stock. The par value of our capital stock is $100 per share. As of December 31, 2020, we had 649 member and former member stockholders and approximately 27 million shares of capital stock outstanding, all of which were Class B Stock.

We declared quarterly cash dividends in 2020 and 2019 as shown in the table below.
(Dollars in millions)
20202019
AnnualizedAnnualized
QuarterRateRate
First2.50 %6.00 %
Second2.50 5.50 
Third2.00 4.50 
Fourth2.00 4.00 
Total2.23 5.05 

Generally, the Board of Directors has discretion to declare or not declare dividends and to determine the rate of any dividend declared. Our policy states that dividends for a quarter are declared and paid from retained earnings after the close of a calendar quarter and are based on average stock balances for the then closed quarter. The Board of Directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by the financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings of the FHLB, and actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment including interest rates and the mortgage and credit markets. The dividend rate is generally referenced as a spread to average short-term interest rates experienced during the quarter to help assess a competitive level for our stockholders.

We may not declare a dividend if, at the time, we are not in compliance with all of our capital requirements. We also may not declare or pay a dividend if, after distributing the dividend, we would fail to meet any of our capital requirements or if we determine that the dividend would create a safety and soundness issue for the FHLB. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding our capital stock.


RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

We provide Letters of Credit in the ordinary course of business to support members' obligations issued in support of unaffiliated, third-party offerings of notes, bonds or other securities. We provided $1 million and $3 million of such credit support during 2020 and 2019. We did not provide such credit support during 2018. To the extent that these Letters of Credit are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, their issuance is exempt from registration pursuant to section 3(a)(2) thereof.

26

Table of Contents
Item 6.     Selected Financial Data.

The following table shows Advance usagepresents selected Statement of members by charter type.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Principal Amount of Advances Percent of Total Principal Amount of Advances Principal Amount of Advances Percent of Total Principal Amount of Advances
Commercial Banks$31,590
 67% $39,195
 71%
Savings Institutions5,689
 12
 5,424
 10
Credit Unions1,307
 3
 1,564
 3
Insurance Companies8,629
 18
 8,676
 16
Community Development Financial Institutions1
 
 1
 
Total member Advances47,216
 100
 54,860
 100
Former member borrowings48
 
 12
 
Total principal amount of Advances$47,264
 100% $54,872
 100%

The following tables present principal balancesCondition data, Statement of Income data and financial ratios for the five membersyears ended December 31, 2020.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)20202019201820172016
STATEMENT OF CONDITION DATA AT PERIOD END:
Total assets$65,296 $93,492 $99,203 $106,895 $104,635 
Advances25,362 47,370 54,822 69,918 69,882 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio9,549 11,236 10,502 9,682 9,150 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans (1)
— 
Investments (2)
27,041 34,389 33,614 27,058 25,334 
Consolidated Obligations, net:
Discount Notes27,500 49,084 46,944 46,211 44,690 
Bonds31,997 38,440 45,659 54,163 53,191 
Total Consolidated Obligations, net59,497 87,524 92,603 100,374 97,881 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock19 22 23 30 35 
Capital:
Capital stock - putable2,641 3,367 4,320 4,241 4,157 
Retained earnings1,304 1,094 1,023 940 834 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(15)(16)(13)(16)(13)
Total capital3,930 4,445 5,330 5,165 4,978 
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
Net interest income$406 $406 $499 $429 $363 
Non-interest income (loss)(7)(10)(37)(1)46 
Non-interest expense92 89 85 79 111 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 35 30 
Net income$276 $276 $339 $314 $268 
FINANCIAL RATIOS:
Dividend payout ratio (3)
30.3 %74.1 %75.6 %66.3 %63.9 %
Weighted average dividend rate (4)
2.23 5.05 5.88 5.00 4.00 
Return on average equity5.78 5.65 6.29 6.15 5.35 
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.25 
Net interest margin (5)
0.46 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.35 
Average equity to average assets5.39 5.04 5.11 5.00 4.76 
Regulatory capital ratio (6)
6.07 4.79 5.41 4.88 4.80 
Operating expenses to average assets (7)
0.080 0.070 0.063 0.060 0.061 
(1)The methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans changed on January 1, 2020 with the largest Advance borrowings.adoption of new accounting guidance on the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the prior periods have not been revised to conform to the new basis of accounting.
(2)Investments include interest-bearing deposits in banks, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.
(3)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared in the period as a percentage of net income.
(4)Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid divided by the average number of shares of capital stock eligible for dividends.
(5)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
(6)Regulatory capital ratio is period-end regulatory capital (capital stock, mandatorily redeemable capital stock and retained earnings) as a percentage of period-end total assets.
(7)Operating expenses comprise compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, which are included in non-interest expense.

27
(Dollars in millions)          
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Name Principal Amount of Advances Percent of Total Principal Amount of Advances Name Principal Amount of Advances Percent of Total Principal Amount of Advances
U.S. Bank, N.A. $13,874
 29% JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. $23,400
 43%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 4,500
 10
 U.S. Bank, N.A. 4,574
 8
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association 3,883
 8
 Third Federal Savings and Loan Association 3,727
 7
First Horizon Bank 2,200
 5
 Nationwide Life Insurance Company 2,510
 5
Pinnacle Bank 2,063
 4
 Pinnacle Bank 1,444
 3
Total of Top 5 $26,520
 56% Total of Top 5 $35,655
 66%

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Advance concentration ratios
This discussion and analysis of the FHLB's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K.


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Recent Developments

COVID-19 Pandemic
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has impacted communities and businesses worldwide, including those in the Fifth District. The effects of COVID-19 continue to evolve, and the full impact and duration of the virus are influencedunknown. Despite the uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic, we continued to fulfill our mission of providing robust access to a key source of readily available and generally similarcompetitively priced wholesale funding to concentration ratios of financial activity among our Fifth District financial institutions. We believe that having largemember financial institutions that actively useand supporting our Mission Assets augments the value of membershipcommitment to all members. For example, such activity improves our operating efficiency, increases our earnings and thereby contributions toaffordable housing and community investment, programs. This activity may enablewhile maintaining strong capital and liquidity positions.

We have remained focused on the health and safety of our employees while maintaining full business operations. Employees are working from home with only a limited number of employees voluntarily working from our downtown Cincinnati location. Although there is no definitive date on when employees will return to the office, we have prepared health and safety policies and procedures to ensure our employees are able to return safely.

At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate impact of COVID-19 on our members, counterparties, vendors, and other third parties we rely upon to conduct our business. However, we continue to monitor the progression of COVID-19 and are committed to assisting members and their communities as impacts related to the pandemic continue to unfold.

Financial Condition

Mission Asset Activity
Mission Assets, which we define as Advances, Letters of Credit, and total MPP are the primary means by which we fulfill our mission with direct connections to members. We regularly monitor our balance sheet concentration of Mission Asset Activity. One measure we use to assess mission achievement is our Primary Mission Asset ratio, which measures the sum of average Advances and mortgage loans as a percentage of average Consolidated Obligations (adjusted for certain high-quality liquid assets, as permitted by regulation). In 2020, the Primary Mission Asset ratio averaged 75 percent, which exceeded the Finance Agency's preferred ratio of 70 percent. In assessing overall mission achievement, we also consider supplemental sources of Mission Asset Activity, the most significant of which is Letters of Credit issued to members.

The following table summarizes our Mission Asset Activity.
Year Ended December 31,
 Ending BalancesAverage Balances
(In millions)2020201920202019
Mission Asset Activity:
Advances (principal)$25,007 $47,264 $42,917 $47,894 
MPP:  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (principal)9,316 10,981 10,995 10,499 
Mandatory Delivery Contracts (notional)137 936 338 516 
Total MPP9,453 11,917 11,333 11,015 
Letters of Credit (notional)28,812 16,205 20,141 15,150 
Total Mission Asset Activity$63,272 $75,386 $74,391 $74,059 

At December 31, 2020, 64 percent of members held Mission Asset Activity, which was relatively stable compared to prior periods. The balance of Mission Asset Activity was $63.3 billion at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $12.1 billion (16 percent) from year-end 2019, which was primarily driven by lower Advance balances. Advance principal balances decreased $22.3
28

Table of Contents
billion (47 percent) from year-end 2019 primarily due to reduced borrowings by large-asset members as these members generally experienced an inflow of deposits on their balance sheets and increased access to other sources of liquidity in the financial markets. The decrease in the balance of Mission Asset Activity was partially offset by an increase of $12.6 billion (78 percent) in Letters of Credit balances from year-end 2019. The increase in Letters of Credit was due in part to members using Letters of Credit rather than securities to secure increased deposits from states and municipalities during the pandemic. We normally earn fees on Letters of Credit based on the actual average amount of the Letters utilized, which generally is less than the notional amount issued.

Average principal Advance balances for 2020 decreased only $5.0 billion (10 percent) compared to 2019 as Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the first quarter as the financial markets reacted to the pandemic. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the end of the third quarter of 2020. Advance balances are often volatile due to members' ability to quickly, normally on the same day, increase or decrease their amount of Advances. We believe providing members flexibility in their funding levels helps support their asset-liability management needs and is a key benefit of membership.

We believe that reduced demand for Advances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the near future. Our business is designed to support significant changes in asset levels without having to undergo material changes in staffing, operations, risk practices, or general resource needs. A key reason for this scalability is that our Capital Plan provides for additional capital when Advances grow and the opportunity for us to obtainretire capital when Advances decline, thereby acting, along with our efficient operating expenses, to preserve competitive profitability.

The MPP principal balance fell $1.7 billion (15 percent) from year-end 2019. During 2020, we purchased $2.6 billion of mortgage loans, while principal reductions of $4.3 billion reflected the significant increase in mortgage loan refinance activity in 2020.

Based on earnings in 2020, we accrued $31 million for the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) pool of funds to be available to members in 2021. In addition to the required AHP assessment, we provided voluntary sponsorship of three other housing programs during 2020. These programs provided funds to cover accessibility and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners, funds for the replacement or repair of homes damaged or destroyed by natural disasters within the Fifth District, and Advances at zero percent interest for COVID-19 related assistance.

Investments
The balance of investments at December 31, 2020 was $27.0 billion, a decrease of $7.3 billion from year-end 2019. At December 31, 2020, investments included $9.7 billion of MBS and $17.3 billion of other investments, which consisted primarily of highly-rated short-term instruments and longer-term U.S. Treasury and GSE obligations held for liquidity. All of our MBS held at December 31, 2020 were issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or a U.S. agency. The decline in the balance of investments at the end of 2020 was due to decreases in both MBS and liquidity investments. MBS balances declined due to an increase in prepayments of the underlying mortgages as a result of the low interest rate environment. Due to regulatory limitations regarding the purchase of MBS that reference LIBOR, we have not been able to fully replace the prepaid MBS with suitable alternatives. Liquidity investments decreased as we decided to hold more favorableof our liquidity portfolio as deposits at the Federal Reserve at the end of 2020 in anticipation of volatile market conditions. At December 31, 2020, we held $3.0 billion in deposits at the Federal Reserve, which are reflected in cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition.

Investments averaged $32.9 billion in 2020, a decrease of $4.9 billion (13 percent) from year-end 2019. The decrease in average investments was primarily driven by the decrease in MBS balances described above. Liquidity investments can vary significantly on a daily basis during times of volatility in Advance balances. We maintained a robust amount of asset liquidity throughout 2020 across a variety of liquidity measures, as discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management."

Capital
Capital adequacy surpassed all minimum regulatory capital requirements in 2020. The GAAP capital-to-assets ratio at December 31, 2020 was 6.02 percent, while the regulatory capital-to-assets ratio was 6.07 percent. Both ratios exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. Regulatory capital includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock accounted for as a liability under GAAP. GAAP and regulatory capital both decreased $0.5 billion in 2020, primarily due to the repurchase of $2.3 billion of excess stock and members' redemption of $0.6 billion of stock in 2020. The repurchase and redemption of capital stock were partially offset by members' purchases of capital stock to support Advance growth at the end of the first quarter. Retained earnings totaled $1.3 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $0.2 billion (19 percent) from year-end 2019, which is a higher growth rate relative to recent years. The increase in retained earnings was due in part to the lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020.
29

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Overall Results
Our earnings reflect the combination of a stable business model and conservative management of risk. Key factors that can cause significant periodic volatility in our profitability are changes in the level of interest rates, changes in spreads between benchmark interest rates and our short-term funding costs, recognition of net amortization due to accelerated prepayments of mortgage assets, and fair value adjustments related to the use of derivatives and the associated hedged items. The table below summarizes our results of operations.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)202020192018
Net income$276 $276 $339 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 
Return on average equity (ROE)5.78 %5.65 %6.29 %
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 
Weighted average dividend rate2.23 5.05 5.88 
Average short-term interest rates (1)
0.51 2.24 2.07 
ROE spread to average short-term interest rates5.27 3.41 4.22 
Dividend rate spread to average short-term interest rates1.72 2.81 3.81 
(1)     Average short-term interest rates consist of 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate.

The historically low interest rate environment in 2020 had a significant impact on earnings. Low long-term interest rates resulted in a higher volume of mortgage refinance activity, which led to elevated levels of mortgage loan repayments and related premium amortization. Additionally, short-term interest rates declined sharply in early 2020 and continued at low levels for the remainder of the year, which lowered the earnings generated from investing our capital. Despite these declines, 2020 net income benefited from gains on the sale of interest rate swaptions during the first quarter of 2020 as well as higher prepayment fees on Advances in 2020. We use swaptions to hedge market risk exposure associated with holding fixed-rate mortgage assets and may sell swaptions as interest rates change in order to offset actual and anticipated risks.

Earnings levels continued to represent competitive returns on stockholders' capital investment. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in assets because we can execute commensurate changes in liability and capital stock balances. ROE was higher than average short-term rates in the periods presented above, while we maintained risk exposures in line with our appetite for a moderate risk profile. The spread between ROE and average short-term rates, which we compute using 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate, is a market benchmark we believe member stockholders actively use to assess the competitiveness of the return on their capital investment.

In December 2020, we paid stockholders a quarterly dividend at a 2.00 percent annualized rate on their capital investment in our company, which is 1.84 percentage points above fourth quarter average short-term interest rates. The lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020 was due to the uncertainty surrounding the economic effects from the COVID-19 pandemic and its ultimate impact on our business and profitability, and to grow retained earnings to bolster the capital position going forward.

30

Table of Contents
Effect of Interest Rate Environment
Trends in market interest rates and the resulting shapes of the market yield curves strongly influence the results of operations and profitability because of how they affect members' demand for Mission Asset Activity, spreads on assets, funding costs and helpsdecisions in managing the tradeoffs in our market risk/return profile. The following table presents key market interest rates (obtained from Bloomberg L.P.).
 Year 2020Year 2019Year 2018
 EndingAverageEndingAverageEndingAverage
Federal funds effective0.09 %0.37 %1.55 %2.16 %2.40 %1.83 %
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)0.09 0.37 1.55 2.20 3.00 1.85 
3-month LIBOR0.24 0.65 1.91 2.33 2.81 2.31 
2-year LIBOR0.20 0.49 1.70 2.03 2.66 2.75 
10-year LIBOR0.93 0.88 1.90 2.09 2.71 2.95 
2-year U.S. Treasury0.12 0.39 1.57 1.97 2.49 2.52 
10-year U.S. Treasury0.92 0.89 1.92 2.14 2.69 2.91 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
0.65 1.17 2.28 2.52 3.06 3.20 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.28 1.64 2.71 2.95 3.51 3.65 
 Year 2020 by Quarter - Average
 Quarter 1Quarter 2Quarter 3Quarter 4
Federal funds effective1.25 %0.06 %0.09 %0.09 %
SOFR1.25 0.05 0.09 0.09 
3-month LIBOR1.54 0.61 0.25 0.22 
2-year LIBOR1.18 0.32 0.22 0.23 
10-year LIBOR1.34 0.69 0.65 0.87 
2-year U.S. Treasury1.10 0.19 0.14 0.15 
10-year U.S. Treasury1.38 0.68 0.65 0.86 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.86 1.09 0.86 0.88 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.31 1.58 1.32 1.37 
(1)     Simple average of current coupon rates of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac par MBS indications.

The target overnight Federal funds rate was in the range of zero to 0.25 percent at December 31, 2020, a decrease from the range of 1.50 to 1.75 percent at December 31, 2019. The low interest rate environment reflects the evolving risks to economic activity from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Average short-term rates were approximately 170 to 180 basis points lower in 2020 compared to 2019 and average long-term rates decreased by approximately 125 to 135 basis points during that same period. The decline in interest rates negatively impacted income in 2020 primarily because of the lower earnings generated from investing capital and the increased mortgage asset prepayments resulting in higher net amortization of premiums on those assets.

Business Outlook and Risk Management

This section summarizes the business outlook and what we believe are our current major risk exposures. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a detailed discussion of certain factors that could affect our corporate objectives, financial condition, and results of operations. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" provides details on current risk exposures.

Strategic/Business Risk
Advances: Our business is cyclical and Mission Asset Activity normally declines in periods of economic contraction, when financial institutions have ample liquidity, or when there is significant growth in the money supply. Other factors that constrain widespread demand for Advances are the low levels of interest rates and competitiveness of Advances relative to deposits and other sources of wholesale funding.

In the last several years, the percentage of assets that members funded with Advances has shown little variation, in the range of two to four percent. We may see a broad-based increase in Advance demand if one or more of the following occur: aggregate
31

Table of Contents
loan portfolios of our members grow quicker than aggregate deposits, interest rates begin to increase over time, or changes in Federal Reserve policy reduce other sources of liquidity available to members.

MPP: MPP balances are influenced by conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, the competitiveness of prices we offer to purchase loans as well as program features, and activity from our largest sellers.

Our ongoing strategy for the MPP has two components: 1) increase the number of regular sellers and participants in the program; and 2) manage purchases and balances at a prudent level relative to capital and total assets to effectively manage market and credit risks consistent with our risk appetite.

Market Risk
During 2020, as in 2019, the market risk exposure to changing interest rates was moderate overall and well within policy limits. We believe that longer-term profitability would not become uncompetitive unless interest rates were to change quickly and significantly. In the short-term, profitability could become uncompetitive if long-term interest rates decrease in excess of 50 basis points leading to faster prepayments of mortgage assets, which would further accelerate the recognition of purchased premiums.

Capital Adequacy
We believe members place a high value on their capital investment in our company. Capital ratios at December 31, 2020, and all throughout the year, exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. We believe the amount of retained earnings is sufficient to protect against members' impairment risk of their capital stock investment in the FHLB and to provide the opportunity to stabilize or increase future dividends. Our capital policies and Capital Plan also have safeguards to ensure we meet regulatory and prudential capital requirements.

Credit Risk
In 2020, we continued to maintain a de minimis level of overall residual credit risk exposure from our Credit Services, investments, and derivative transactions. We believe policies and procedures related to credit underwriting, Advance collateral management, and transactions with investment and derivative counterparties continue to mitigate these risks. We have never experienced any credit losses, and we continue to have no loan loss reserves or impairment recorded for these instruments. Residual credit risk exposure in the mortgage loan portfolio was minimal.

Liquidity Risk
Our liquidity position remained strong during 2020, as did our overall ability to fund operations through the issuance of Consolidated Obligations at acceptable interest costs. Investor demand for FHLBank System debt continued to be robust. There were no substantive stresses on market access or liquidity from external market and political events. Although we can make no assurances, we believe there is only a remote possibility of a liquidity or funding crisis in the System that could impair our ability to participate, on a cost-effective basis, in issuances of new debt, service outstanding debt, maintain adequate capital levels, or pay competitive dividends.

Regulatory and Legislative Risk and Significant Developments
General: The FHLBank System is subject to legislative and regulatory oversight. Legislative and regulatory actions applicable, directly or indirectly, to the FHLBank System in the last decade have increased uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. This is due primarily to the uncertainty around potential future GSE reform, and the evolution of mortgage financing moving towards financial institutions currently not eligible for FHLBank membership. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for more discussion. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of GSE reform and whether our membership base will be legislatively and regulatorily permitted to evolve in concert with the housing finance market.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Brokered Deposits Restrictions:On January 22, 2021, the FDIC published a final rule, effective April 1, 2021, that amends its brokered deposits regulations that apply to less than well-capitalized insured depository institutions. The FDIC stated that the amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations and they establish a new framework for analyzing the deposit broker definition, which determines whether deposits placed through deposit placement arrangements qualify as brokered deposits. These deposit placement arrangements include those between insured depository institutions and third parties, such as financial technology companies, for a variety of business purposes, including access to deposits. The amendments to the FDIC's brokered deposit regulations, among other things, clarify what it means to be engaged in the business of facilitating the placement of deposits and expand the scope of the primary purpose exception. The rule amendments are expected to have the effect of narrowing the definition of deposit broker and excluding more deposits from treatment as brokered deposits. The amendments also establish an application and reporting
32

Table of Contents
process with respect to the primary purpose exception for businesses that do not meet one of several bright-line tests, and they affirm the FDIC’s position that the brokering of certificates of deposit constitutes deposit brokering.

This rule may have an effect on member demand for certain Advances, but we cannot predict the extent of the impact. We do not expect this rule to materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Housing Goals Amendments:On June 25, 2020, the Finance Agency published a final rule, effective August 24, 2020, amending the FHLBank housing goals regulation. Enforcement of the final rule will phase in over three years. The final rule eliminated the existing $2.5 billion volume threshold, such that all FHLBanks are subject to a new housing goal, regardless of their mortgage purchase volume. The new housing goal establishes one overall target level requiring 20 percent of an FHLBank's total mortgage purchases to be home-purchase mortgages for low- and very-low income families and low-income areas as well as refinancing mortgages for low-income families. The final rule also establishes a separate small member participation housing goal with a target level of 50 percent. The final rule provides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of the goals. We do not believe these changes will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Supervisory Letter - Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans as Collateral for FHLBank Advances:On April 23, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter (PPP Supervisory Letter) permitting the FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral for Advances as “Agency Securities,” given the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 100 percent guarantee of the unpaid principal balance. On April 20, 2020, the SBA's third interim final rule related to PPP loans was published. The rule explicitly waived certain regulatory requirements that must be satisfied before a member could pledge PPP loans to the FHLBanks as collateral. The PPP Supervisory Letter establishes a series of conditions under which the FHLBanks may accept PPP loans as collateral that focus on the financial condition of members, collateral discounts, and pledge dollar limits. On December 27, 2020, the President signed into law an extension of the PPP until March 21, 2021. The April 23, 2020 Supervisory Letter from the Finance Agency allowing us maintain competitively priced Mission Assets.to accept PPP loans as collateral remains in effect.


Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act:The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The $2.2 trillion package was the largest stimulus bill in United States history. The CARES Act is in addition to previous relief legislation passed by Congress in March 2020. The legislation provides the following:
Assistance to businesses, states, and municipalities.
A loan program for small businesses, non-profits and physician practices that can be forgiven through employee retention incentives.
Treasury Secretary authority to make loans or loan guarantees to states, municipalities, and eligible businesses and loosens some regulations imposed through the Dodd-Frank Act.
Direct payments to eligible taxpayers and their families.
Expanded eligibility for unemployment insurance and payment amounts.
Mortgage Loans Heldforbearance provisions and a foreclosure moratorium.

Funding for Portfolio (Mortgage Purchase Program,the PPP, which was created by the CARES Act, was increased with the enactment of subsequent laws, most recently by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 27, 2020. Additional phases of the CARES Act or MPP)other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation may be enacted by Congress or other actions by the President, state governments, and governmental agencies. In connection with the foreclosure moratorium noted above, we have asked servicers of the mortgage loans we own to temporarily suspend all foreclosure sales and evictions, unless a home is vacant, in order to allow homeowners to stay in their homes during this period. We continue to monitor these actions and guidance as they evolve and to evaluate the potential impact to the U.S. economy; the impacts to mortgages held or serviced by our members that we accept as collateral; the impacts on our MPP portfolio; and the impacts to our overall business.

LIBOR Transition:We are planning for the replacement of LIBOR given that the FCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has established SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. The market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk.

33

Table of Contents
As many of our assets and derivatives are still indexed to LIBOR, we have developed and implemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and balance sheet management. Part of our LIBOR transition plan includes our previously implemented fallback language for LIBOR-indexed Advances and Consolidated Bonds in new and legacy contracts. As for our investments that are tied to LIBOR, we are monitoring market-wide efforts to enhance fallback language for new activity and develop frameworks to address existing transactions.

On October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), published a Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol). Both the Supplement and the Protocol were effective on January 25, 2021. As of that date, all legacy bilateral derivatives transactions subject to Protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference a covered Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR), including U.S. dollar LIBOR, were effectively amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation. We have adhered to the Protocol and have worked with our counterparties, as necessary, to address over-the-counter derivative agreements referencing U.S. dollar LIBOR as a part of our LIBOR transition efforts.

The Finance Agency has also issued supervisory letters designed to ensure the FHLBanks will be able to identify and prudently manage the risks associated with the termination of LIBOR in a safe and sound manner. As of June 30, 2020, the FHLBanks were required to cease entering into new LIBOR-based financial instruments that mature after December 31, 2021, except for investments and option embedded products. With respect to investments, the Finance Agency required the FHLBanks, by December 31, 2019, to stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. These phase-out dates did not apply to collateral accepted by the FHLBanks. As directed by the Finance Agency, the FHLBanks began requiring their members to report levels of LIBOR-linked collateral that mature after December 31, 2021. This will assist the FHLBanks in determining the level of member reliance on these assets to support borrowings, make decisions about their future eligibility and the impact of any incremental haircuts and asset value deterioration on borrowing capacity.

We have Advances, investment securities and derivatives with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. Each of these instruments are indexed to LIBOR settings that will no longer be provided after June 30, 2023, as noted above. The following table presents LIBOR-indexed Advances, investment securities and derivatives by contractual maturity at December 31, 2020.
(In millions)Maturing on or before June 30, 2023Maturing after June 30, 2023
LIBOR-Indexed Variable Rate Financial Instruments
Advances by redemption term$2,599 $3,012 
MBS by contractual maturity (1)
— 5,929 
Total principal amount$2,599 $8,941 
Derivatives, notional amount by termination date$9,339 $4,680 
(1)MBS are presented by contractual maturity; however, their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

The market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR is gradual and complicated, including the possible development of term structures and credit adjustments to accommodate differences between LIBOR and SOFR. As such, we are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact of such a transition on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

34

Table of Contents
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Credit Services

Credit Activity and Advance Composition
The table below shows principal purchasestrends in Advance balances by major programs and reductions of loans in the MPP for eachnotional amount of Letters of Credit.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable Rate-Indexed:    
LIBOR$5,611 22 %$10,430 22 %
SOFR118 500 
Other82 — 221 
Total5,811 23 11,151 24 
Fixed-Rate:    
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 19,386 41 
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 11,476 24 
Putable (2)
2,657 11 1,444 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,358 
Other1,151 1,449 
Total19,196 77 36,113 76 
Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$47,264 100 %
Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $16,205 
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020September 30, 2020June 30, 2020March 31, 2020
 Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable-Rate Indexed:  
LIBOR$5,611 22 %$5,846 22 %$21,071 44 %$28,889 36 %
SOFR118 116 — 116 — 2,000 
Other82 — 123 83 — 247 — 
Total5,811 23 6,085 23 21,270 44 31,136 39 
Fixed-Rate:  
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 3,896 15 8,978 18 28,058 35 
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 10,207 38 11,445 24 14,452 18 
Putable (2)
2,657 11 3,107 12 3,164 3,164 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,195 2,309 2,439 
Other1,151 1,158 1,241 680 
Total19,196 77 20,563 77 27,137 56 48,793 61 
Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$26,648 100 %$48,407 100 %$79,929 100 %
Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $23,011 $22,381 $15,785 
(1)As a percentage of total Advances principal.    
(2)Excludes Putable Advances where the last two years.related put options have expired or where the Advance is indexed to a variable-rate. These Advances are classified based on their current terms.

(In millions)2019 2018
Balance, beginning of year$10,272
 $9,454
Principal purchases2,631
 1,936
Principal reductions(1,922) (1,118)
Balance, end of year$10,981
 $10,272

Although there were 78 active members participating in the MPPAdvance balances at December 31, 2019, approximately 622020 decreased 47 percent compared to year-end 2019. Advance balances declined in 2020 as large-asset members reduced their borrowings. The reduction in borrowings was primarily driven by these members generally experiencing an inflow of deposits on their balance sheets, while also having access to other liquidity sources as a result of certain government actions related to the pandemic. Despite the overall decline, Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the principal purchases in 2019 resulted from activityfirst quarter of our four largest sellers. All loans acquired in 2019 were conventional loans.

The following tables show2020 as the percentage of principal balances from Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) supplying five percent or more of total principalfinancial markets reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the percentage of principal balances from all other PFIs. As shown below, MPP activity is concentrated amongst a few members.members
35

Table of Contents
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018
 Principal % of Total  Principal % of Total
Union Savings Bank$3,574
 33% Union Savings Bank$3,449
 34%
Guardian Savings Bank FSB1,004
 9
 Guardian Savings Bank FSB987
 10
Firstbank714
 7
 All others5,836
 56
All others5,689
 51
     Total$10,272
 100%
Total$10,981
 100% 
   

We closely track the refinancing incentives of our mortgage assets (including loansturned to us for liquidity, primarily in the MPPform of LIBOR and MBS) becauseREPO Advances. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the option for homeowners to change their principal payments normally represents the largest portionend of our market risk exposure and can affect MPP balances. MPP principal paydowns in 2019 equated to a 14 percent annual constant prepayment rate, up from the eight percent rate for all of 2018. The reductions in mortgage rates that occurred in the first nine months of 2019 accelerated prepayment speeds in the second half of 2019. In the fourth quarter of 2019, mortgage rates were steady, remaining at historical low levels. As such, we expect the recent trend of faster prepayments to continue in 2020 unless mortgage rates rise.2020.

The MPP's composition of balances by loan type, original final maturity, and weighted-average mortgage note rate did not change materially in 2019. MPP yields earned in 2019, after consideration of funding and hedging costs, continued to offer favorable returns relative to their market and credit risk exposure.

Housing and Community Investment
Our Housing and Community Investment Programs include the Affordable Housing Program and various housing and community economic development-related Advance and grant programs. We fund the Affordable Housing Program with an accrual equal to 10 percent of our previous year's net earnings, mandated by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. See Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for a complete description of the Affordable Housing Program calculation.

The Affordable Housing Program provides funding for the development of affordable housing. The Program consists of a Competitive Program and a homeownership program called Welcome Home, which assists homebuyers with down payments and closing costs. Under the Competitive Program, we currently distribute funds in the form of grants to members that apply and successfully compete in an annual offering. Under Welcome Home, we make funds available beginning in March until they have been fully committed. For both programs, the income of qualifying individuals or households must be 80 percent or less of the area median income. We set aside up to 35 percent of the Affordable Housing Program accrual for Welcome Home and allocate the remainder to the Competitive Program.

Our Board of Directors also may allocate funds to voluntary housing programs. In 2020, the Board re-authorized an additional $2.0 million to the Carol M. Peterson Housing Fund for use during the year. These funds are primarily used as grants to pay for accessibility rehabilitation and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners. In 2012, the Board of Directors also established the Disaster Reconstruction Program, a voluntary housing program that provides grants for purchase or rehabilitation of a home within the Fifth District for residents that have suffered loss or damage to their primary residence as a result of a state or federally declared disaster. Since the program's inception, we have disbursed over $4.7 million to assist 378 households. Furthermore, in support of our members during the COVID-19 pandemic, we created a new Advance program that offered Advances with terms up to six months at zero percent interest to members between May 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. These Advances supported COVID-19 related assistance made by all Fifth District members. In 2020, we issued a total of $183 million of these Advances of which $34 million remained outstanding at December 31, 2020.

Two other housing programs that fall outside the auspices of the Affordable Housing Program are the Community Investment Program and the Economic Development Program. Advances under the former program have rates equal to our cost of funds, while Advances under the latter program have rates equal to our cost of funds plus reasonable administrative costs. Members use the Community Investment Program to serve housing needs of low- and moderate-income households and, under certain conditions, community economic development projects. The Economic Development Program is a discounted Advance program used to promote economic development and job creation and retention.

Investments
Types of Investments. A primary reason we hold investments is to carry sufficient asset liquidity. Permissible liquidity investments include Federal funds, certificates of deposit, bank notes, bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and debt securities issued by the U.S. government, its agencies, or other GSE's. The first five categories represent unsecured lending to private counterparties. We also may place deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. We are prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from investing (secured or unsecured) in financial investments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. Many liquidity investments have short-term maturities.

9

Table of Contents
Subject to regulatory limitations on purchases of new LIBOR-based investments, we are also permitted by regulation to purchase the following other investments, which have longer original maturities than liquidity investments:

MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations (together, referred to as MBS) issued by GSEs, other U.S. government agencies or private issuers;

asset-backed securities collateralized by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans issued by GSEs or private issuers; and

marketable direct obligations of certain government units and agencies (such as state housing finance agencies) that supply needed funding for housing or community lending and that do not exceed 20 percent of our regulatory capital.

We have never purchased asset-backed securities and do not own any privately-issued MBS.

Per Finance Agency regulations, the total investment in MBS and asset-backed securities may not exceed 300 percent of previous month-end regulatory capital on the day we purchase the securities. See the “Capital Resources” section below for the definition of regulatory capital.

Purposes of Having Investments. The investments portfolio helps achieve corporate objectives in the following ways:

Liquidity management. Liquidity investments support the ability to fund assets on a timely basis, especially Advances, and when it may be more difficult to issue new debt. These investments supply liquidity because we normally fund them with longer-term debt than asset maturities. We also may be able to obtain liquidity by selling certain investments for cash without a significant loss of value.

Earnings enhancement. The investments portfolio, especially MBS, assists with earning a competitive return on capital, and increasing funding for Housing and Community Investment programs. In addition, liquidity investments help stabilize earnings because they typically earn a relatively stable spread to the cost of debt issued to fund them.

Management of debt issuance. Maintaining a short-term liquidity investment portfolio can help us participate in attractively priced debt issuances, on an opportunistic basis. We can temporarily invest proceeds from debt issuances in short-term liquid assets and quickly access them to fund demand for Mission Asset Activity, rather than having debt issuances dictated solely by the timing of member demand.

Support of housing market. Investment in MBS and state housing finance agency bonds directly supports the residential mortgage market by providing capital and financing for mortgages.

How We Manage Risks of Investments. We strive to ensure our investment holdings have a moderate degree of market risk and limited credit risk, which tends to lower the returns we can expect to earn on these securities. We believe that a philosophy of purchasing investments with a high amount of market or credit risk would be inconsistent with our GSE status and corporate objectives.

Market risk associated with short-term investments tends to be minimal because of their short maturities and because we typically fund them with short-term Consolidated Obligations having similar maturities. We mitigate much of the market risk of MBS, which exists primarily from changes in mortgage prepayment speeds, by limiting their balances to 300 percent of regulatory capital and by funding them with a portfolio of long-term fixed-rate callable and non-callable Obligations. Additionally, we mitigate much of the market risk of longer-term non-MBS securities, and a portion of our MBS, by using interest rate swaps to effectively convert the fixed rate investments to adjustable-rate investments. We also manage the market risk exposure of the entire balance sheet within prudent policy limits.

Finance Agency regulations and internal policies also provide controls on market risk exposure by restricting the types of mortgage loans, MBS and other investments we can hold. These restrictions prohibit, among others, the purchase of interest only or principal only stripped MBS and MBS whose average life varies more than six years under a 300 basis points interest rate shock.

Our internal policies specify guidelines for, and relatively tight constraints on, the types and amounts of short-term investments we are permitted to hold and the maximum amount of credit risk exposure we are permitted to have with eligible counterparties. We are permitted to invest only in the instruments of counterparties with high credit ratings, and because of our conservative
10

Table of Contents
investment policies and practices, we believe all of our investments have high credit quality. We have never had a credit loss or credit-related write down of any investment security.

Deposits
We provide a variety of deposit programs, including demand, overnight, term and Federal funds, which enable depositors to invest funds in short-term liquid assets. We accept deposits from members, other FHLBanks, any institution to which we offer correspondent services, and other government instrumentalities. The rates of interest we pay on deposits are subject to change daily based on comparable money market interest rates. The balances in deposit programs tend to vary positively with the amount of idle funds members have available to invest, as well as the level of short-term interest rates. Deposits have typically represented one to two percent of our funding sources in recent years.

Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP or Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio)

Description of the MPP
Types of Loans and Benefits. Finance Agency regulations permit FHLBanks to purchase and hold specified whole mortgage loans from their members, which offers members a competitive alternative to the traditional secondary mortgage market and directly supports housing finance. We account for MPP loans as mortgage loans held for portfolio. By selling mortgage loans to us, members can increase their balance sheet liquidity and lower interest rate and mortgage prepayment risks. The MPP particularly enables small- and medium-sized community-based financial institutions to use their existing relationship with us to participate more effectively in the secondary mortgage market.

We purchase two types of mortgage loans: qualifying conforming fixed-rate conventional 1-4 family residential mortgages and residential mortgages fully insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Members approved to sell us these loans are referred to as Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs).

A “conventional” mortgage refers to a non-government-guaranteed mortgage. A “conforming” mortgage refers to the maximum amount permissible to be lent as a regular prime (i.e., non-jumbo, non-subprime) mortgage. For 2021, the Finance Agency established the conforming limit at $548,250 with loans originated in a limited number of high-cost cities and counties receiving higher conforming limits. We have elected not to purchase mortgages subject to these higher conforming limits.

Loan Purchase Process. A Master Commitment Contract is negotiated with each PFI, in which the PFI agrees to make a best efforts attempt to sell us a specific dollar amount of mortgage loans generally over a period of up to 12 months. We purchase loans pursuant to a Mandatory Delivery Contract, which is a legal commitment we make to purchase, and a PFI makes to deliver, a specified dollar amount of mortgage loans, with a forward settlement date, at a specified range of note rates and prices.

Shortly before delivering the loans that will fill the Mandatory Delivery Contract, the PFI must submit loan level detail including underwriting information. We apply procedures through an automated system designed to screen loans that do not comply with our policies. Our underwriting guidelines generally mirror those of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for conforming conventional loans, although our guidelines and pool composition requirements are more conservative in a number of ways in order to further limit credit risk exposure. PFIs are required to make certain representations and warranties against our underwriting guidelines on the loans they sell to us. If a PFI sells us a loan in breach of those representations and warranties, we have the contractual right to require the PFI to repurchase the loan.

How We Manage Risks of the MPP
Market Risk. We mitigate the MPP's market risk similarly to how we mitigate market risk from MBS.

Credit Risk - Conventional Mortgage Loans. A unique feature of the MPP is that it separates the various activities and risks associated with residential mortgage lending for conventional loans and allows these risks and activities to be taken on by different entities. We manage the market risk (including interest rate risk and prepayment risk) and liquidity risk. PFIs manage marketing, originating and, in most cases, servicing the loans. PFIs may either retain servicing or sell it to a qualified and approved third-party servicer (also referred to as a PFI). Because PFIs manage and bear most of the credit risk, they do not pay us a guarantee fee to transfer credit risk.

We manage credit risk exposure for conventional loans primarily through underwriting and pool composition requirements and by applying layered credit enhancements. These enhancements, which apply after a homeowner's equity is exhausted, include available primary mortgage insurance, the Lender Risk Account (discussed below), and Supplemental Mortgage Insurance. Supplemental Mortgage Insurance is applicable to loans acquired before February 2011 and was purchased by the PFI from one
11

Table of Contents
of our approved third-party providers naming us as the beneficiary. These credit enhancements are designed to protect us against credit losses in scenarios of severe downward movements in housing prices and unfavorable changes in other factors that can affect loan delinquencies and defaults.

The Lender Risk Account is a key component of how we manage residual credit risk. It is a holdback of a portion of the initial purchase price. Starting after five years from the loan purchase date, we may return the holdback to PFIs if they manage credit risk to pre-defined acceptable levels of exposure on the loan pools they sell to us. Actual loan losses are deducted from the amount of the purchase-price holdback we return to the PFI. The Lender Risk Account provides PFIs with a strong incentive to sell us high quality performing mortgage loans.

Credit Risk - FHA Mortgage Loans. Because the FHA makes an explicit guarantee on FHA loans, we do not require any credit enhancements on these loans beyond primary mortgage insurance.

"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides more detail on how we manage market and credit risks for the MPP.

Earnings from the MPP
The MPP enhances long-term profitability on a risk-adjusted basis and augments the return on member stockholders' capital investment. We generate earnings in the MPP from monthly interest payments minus the cost of funding and the cost of hedging the MPP's interest rate risk. Interest income on each loan is computed as the mortgage note rate multiplied by the loan's principal balance:

minus servicing costs (0.25 percent for conventional loans and 0.44 percent for FHA loans);
minus the cost of Supplemental Mortgage Insurance (for applicable loans); and
adjusted for the amortization of purchase premiums or the accretion of purchase discounts and for the amortization or accretion of fair value adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments.

For new loan purchases, we consider the cost of the Lender Risk Account when we set conventional loan prices and evaluate the MPP's potential return on investment. The pricing of each structure depends on a number of factors and is specific to the PFI and to the loan pool. We do not receive fees or income for retaining the risk of losses in excess of any credit enhancements.


FUNDING - CONSOLIDATED OBLIGATIONS

Our primary source of funding and hedging market risk exposure is through participation in the sale of Consolidated Obligation debt securities to global investors. Obligations are the joint and several obligations of all the FHLBanks, backed only by the financial resources of these institutions. There are two types of Consolidated Obligations: Consolidated Bonds (Bonds) and Consolidated Discount Notes (Discount Notes).

We participate in the issuance of Bonds for three purposes:

to finance and hedge intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate Advances and mortgage assets;
to finance and hedge short-term, adjustable-rate Advances, and swapped Advances, typically by synthetically transforming fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate funding through the execution of interest rate swaps; and
to acquire liquidity investments.

Bonds may have fixed or adjustable rates of interest. Fixed-rate Bonds are either non-callable or callable. A callable Bond is one that we are able to redeem in whole or in part at our discretion on one or more predetermined call dates according to the Bond's offering notice. The maturity of Bonds typically ranges from 1 year to 20 years. Adjustable-rate Bonds use a benchmark market interest rate, typically SOFR, for interest rate resets. We do not participate in the issuance of range Bonds, zero coupon Bonds, or indexed principal redemption Bonds.

We use fixed-rate Bonds to fund longer-term fixed-rate Advances and longer-term fixed-rate mortgage assets, and use adjustable-rate Bonds to fund adjustable-rate Advances and certain longer-term fixed rate investments that have been swapped to an adjustable-rate.

12

Table of Contents
We transact in interest rate swaps to synthetically convert some fixed-rate Bonds to adjustable-rate terms. These are used to hedge adjustable-rate Advances.

We participate in the issuance of Discount Notes to fund short-term Advances, adjustable-rate Advances, putable Advances (which we normally swap to an adjustable-rate), liquidity investments, and a portion of longer-term fixed-rate assets. Discount Notes have maturities from one day to one year, with most of ours normally maturing within three months.

The mix of Obligations fluctuates in response to relative changes in short-term versus long-term assets, relative changes in fixed-rate versus adjustable-rate assets, decisions on market risk management (particularly the amount of funding of longer-term assets with short-term Obligations), and differences in relative costs of various Obligations.
Interest rates on Obligations are affected by a multitude of factors such as: overall economic and credit conditions; credit ratings of the FHLBank System; investor demand and preferences for our debt securities; the level of interest rates and the shape of the U.S. Treasury curve, the SOFR swap curve or LIBOR swap curve; and the supply, volume, timing, and characteristics of debt issuances by the FHLBanks, other GSEs, and other highly rated issuers.

Finance Agency regulations govern the issuance of Obligations. An FHLBank may not issue individual debt securities without Finance Agency approval, and we have never done so. The Office of Finance services Obligations, prepares the FHLBank System's quarterly and annual combined financial statements, and serves as a source of information for the FHLBanks on capital market developments.

We have the primary liability for our portion of Obligations, i.e., those issued on our behalf for which we received the proceeds. However, we also are jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Obligations. If we do not pay the principal or interest in full when due on any Obligation issued on our FHLB's behalf, we are prohibited from paying dividends or redeeming or repurchasing shares of capital stock. If another FHLBank were unable to repay its participation in an Obligation for which it is the primary obligor, the Finance Agency could call on each of the other FHLBanks to repay all or part of the Obligation. The Finance Agency has never invoked this authority.


LIQUIDITY

Our business requires a substantial and continual amount of liquidity to satisfy financial obligations (primarily maturing Consolidated Obligations) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and to provide members access to timely Advance funding and mortgage loan sales in all financial environments. We obtain liquidity by issuing debt, holding short-term assets that mature before their associated funding, and having the ability to sell certain investments without significant accounting or economic consequences. Sources of asset liquidity include cash, maturing Advances, maturing investments, principal paydowns of mortgage assets, the ability to sell certain investments, and interest payments received. Uses of liquidity primarily include repayments of Obligations, issuances of new Advances, purchases of loans under the MPP, purchases of investments, and payments of interest.

Liquidity requirements are significant because Advance balances can be volatile, many have short-term maturities, and we strive to allow members to borrow Advances on the same day they request them. We regularly monitor liquidity risks and the investment and cash resources available to meet liquidity needs, as well as statutory and regulatory liquidity requirements.

Because Obligations have favorable credit ratings and because the FHLBank System is one of the largest sellers of debt in the worldwide capital markets, the System historically has been able to satisfy its liquidity needs through debt issuance across a wide range of structures at relatively favorable spreads to benchmark market interest rates, such as U.S. Treasury securities.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Requirements

Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Under Finance Agency regulations, regulatory capital is composed of all capital stock (including stock classified as mandatorily redeemable), retained earnings, general loss allowances, and other amounts from sources the Finance Agency determines are available to absorb losses. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLB Act), permanent capital equals Class B stock plus retained earnings and is available to absorb financial losses.
13

Table of Contents

Finance Agency regulations stipulate that we must comply with three limits on capital leverage and risk-based capital. These ensure a low amount of capital risk while providing for competitive profitability. We have always complied with these regulatory capital requirements.

We must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. This requirement historically has been closest to affecting our operations.
We must maintain at least a five percent minimum leverage ratio of capital divided by total assets, which includes a 1.5 weighting factor applicable to permanent capital. Because all of our Class B stock is permanent capital, this requirement is met automatically if we satisfy the four percent unweighted capital requirement.
We are subject to a risk-based capital rule in which we must hold an amount of "permanent" capital that exceeds the amount of exposure to market risk, credit risk, and operational risk. How we determine the amount of these risk exposures is stipulated by Finance Agency regulation. Permanent capital includes retained earnings and the regulatory amount of Class B capital stock.

In addition to the minimum capital requirements, the GLB Act and our Capital Plan promote the adequacy of our capital to absorb financial losses in three ways. These combine to give member stockholders a clear incentive to require us to minimize our risk profile:

the five-year redemption period for Class B stock;
the option we have to call on members to purchase additional capital if required to preserve safety and soundness; and
the limitations, described below, on our ability to honor requested redemptions of capital if we are at risk of not maintaining safe and sound operations.

In accordance with the GLB Act, our stock is also putable by members. There are statutory and regulatory restrictions on our obligation or right to redeem or repurchase outstanding stock, including, but not limited to, the following:

We may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, we would fail to satisfy any regulatory capital requirements. By law, we may not redeem any stock if we become undercapitalized.

We may not redeem any capital stock without approval of the Finance Agency if either our Board of Directors or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred or are likely to incur losses resulting or expected to result in a charge against capital.

If we were to be liquidated, stockholders would be entitled to receive the par value of their capital stock after payment in full to our creditors. In addition, each stockholder would be entitled to any retained earnings in an amount proportional to the stockholder's share of the total shares of capital stock. In the event of a merger or consolidation of the FHLB, the Board of Directors would determine the rights and preferences of the FHLB's stockholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.

Capital Plan
Our Capital Plan ties the amount of each member's required capital stock to the amount of the member's assets and the amount and type of its Mission Asset Activity with us. The Capital Plan has the following basic characteristics:
14

Table of Contents

We offer only one class of capital stock, Class B, which is generally redeemable upon a member's five-year advance written notice. We strive to manage capital risks to be able to safely and soundly satisfy redemption requests sooner than five years, although we may elect to wait up to five years (or longer under certain conditions).

We issue shares of capital stock as required for an institution to become a member or maintain membership (membership stock), as required for members to capitalize Mission Asset Activity (activity stock), and if we pay dividends in the form of additional shares of stock.

We may, subject to the restrictions described above, repurchase certain capital stock (i.e., "excess" capital stock).

We believe the Capital Plan enables us to efficiently increase and decrease capital stock needed to capitalize assets in response to changes in the membership base and demand for Mission Asset Activity. This enables us to maintain a prudent amount of financial leverage and consistently generate a competitive dividend return.

At December 31, 2020, the amount of membership stock required for each member ranged from a minimum of $1,000 to a maximum of $30 million, with the amount within that range determined as a percentage of member assets. Separate from its membership stock, each member is required to purchase and hold activity stock to capitalize its Mission Asset Activity. For purposes of the Capital Plan, Mission Asset Activity includes the principal balance of Advances, guaranteed funds and rate Advance commitments, the principal balance of loans and commitments in the MPP, and beginning January 1, 2021, the notional balance of Letters of Credit.

The FHLB must capitalize its total assets at a rate of at least four percent. The Capital Plan supports the memberships' stock component towards this overall requirement. Each member is required to maintain an amount of activity stock within a range of a minimum and maximum percentage for each type of Mission Asset Activity. The Capital Plan amendment that went into effect on January 1, 2021 changed the activity percentages and set these minimums and maximums to be equal. As a result, the current percentages are as follows:
Mission Asset ActivityMinimum Activity PercentageMaximum Activity Percentage
Advances4.50%4.50%
Advance Commitments4.504.50
MPP3.003.00
Letters of Credit0.100.10
If a member owns more stock than is needed to satisfy both its membership stock requirement and the maximum activity stock percentages for its Mission Asset Activity, we designate the remaining stock as the member's excess capital stock. The member may utilize its excess stock to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity.

Prior to 2021, if an individual member's excess stock reached zero, the Capital Plan had permitted us, with certain limits, to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity of that member with excess stock owned by other members at the maximum percentage rate. This feature, called “cooperative capital,” enabled us to effectively utilize our excess capital stock holdings. However, with the most recently amended Capital Plan, by setting the minimum and maximum activity requirements to be equal, members are no longer able to utilize this cooperative capital for marginal new business.

Retained Earnings

Purposes and Amount of Retained Earnings
Retained earnings are important to protect members' capital stock investment against the risk of impairment and to enhance our ability to pay stable and competitive dividends when earnings may be volatile. Impairment risk is the risk that members would have to write down the par value of their capital stock investment in our FHLB as a result of their analysis of ultimate recoverability. An extreme situation of earnings instability, in which other-than-temporary losses were experienced and expected for a period of time, could result in members determining that the value of their capital stock investment was impaired.

We have a policy that sets forth a minimum amount of retained earnings we believe is needed to mitigate impairment risk and facilitate dividend stability in light of the risks we face. At December 31, 2020, the minimum retained earnings requirement was approximately $290 million, based on mitigating quantifiable risks under very stressed business and market scenarios to a 99
15

Table of Contents
percent confidence level. At the end of 2020, our retained earnings totaled $1.3 billion. We believe the current amount of retained earnings is fully sufficient to protect our capital stock against impairment risk and to provide for dividend stability.

Joint Capital Agreement to Augment Retained Earnings
The FHLBanks entered into a Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement (the “Capital Agreement”) in February 2011. The Capital Agreement provides that each FHLBank will, on a quarterly basis, allocate at least 20 percent of its net income to a restricted retained earnings account (the “Account”) until the balance of the Account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding Consolidated Obligations for the calendar quarter. The Account is not available to be distributed as dividends except under certain limited circumstances. The Capital Agreement does not limit our ability to use retained earnings held outside of the Account to pay dividends. Although we have always maintained compliance with our capital requirements, we believe the Capital Agreement enhances risk mitigation by building a larger capital buffer over time to absorb unexpected losses, if any, that we may experience.


USE OF DERIVATIVES

Finance Agency regulations and our policies establish guidelines for the execution and use of derivative transactions. We are prohibited from trading in, or the speculative use of, derivatives and have limits on the amount of credit risk to which we may be exposed. Most of our derivatives activity involves interest rate swaps, some of which may include options. We account for all derivatives at fair value.

Similar to our participation in debt issuances, use of derivatives is integral to hedging market risk created by Advances, certain longer-term fixed-rate investments and mortgage assets, including commitments. Derivatives related to Advances most commonly hedge either:

below-market rates and/or the market risk exposure on Putable Advances, and certain other Advances, for which members have sold us options embedded within the Advances; or

Regular Fixed-Rate Advances when it may not be as advantageous to issue Obligations or when it may improve our market risk management.

The derivatives we transact related to investments hedge market risk exposure by effectively converting the fixed-rate investment to an adjustable-rate investment. The derivatives we transact related to mortgage assets primarily hedge interest rate risk and prepayment risk. Such derivatives include options on interest rates swaps (swaptions) and sales of to-be-announced MBS for forward settlement.

Derivatives transactions related to Bonds help us intermediate between the preference of capital market investors for intermediate- and long-term fixed-rate debt securities and the preference of our members for shorter-term or adjustable-rate Advances. We can satisfy the preferences of both groups by issuing long-term fixed-rate Bonds and entering into an interest rate swap that synthetically converts the Bonds to an adjustable-rate funding basis that matches up with the short-term and adjustable-rate Advances, thereby preserving a favorable interest rate spread.

We may also transact derivatives to reduce the repricing risk of Discount Notes that fund certain overnight and shorter-term assets.

16

Table of Contents
Use of derivatives can result in a substantial amount of volatility of accounting and economic earnings. We strive to maintain a low amount of earnings volatility from realized gains and losses on derivatives. We accept a higher amount of earnings volatility from unrealized gains and losses on recording derivatives at fair values, to the extent our use of derivatives effectively hedge market risk exposure.


COMPETITION

Advances
Members' demand for our Advances is affected by, among other things, the cost of other sources of funding available, including our members' customer deposits. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured, including the federal government, commercial banks, investment banking divisions of commercial banks, brokered deposits and other FHLBanks when our members' affiliated institutions are members of other FHLBanks. In addition, competition is often more significant when originating Advances to larger members, which have greater access to the national and global capital markets.

Our ability to compete successfully with other suppliers of wholesale funding, including other FHLBanks, depends primarily on the total cost of our products to members, which include the rates we charge, earnings and dividend performance, collateral policies, capital stock requirements, product features and members' perceptions of our relative safety and soundness. In addition, our competitive environment continues to be impacted by the Federal Reserve's low interest-rate environment and actions to provide liquidity in the financial markets. See Item 1A. Risk Factors below for further discussion.

Mortgage Purchase Program
The primary competitors for mortgage loans we purchase in the MPP are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), and other secondary mortgage market conduits. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in particular, have long-established and efficient programs and are the dominant purchasers of fixed-rate conventional mortgages. In addition, a number of private financial institutions have well-established securitization programs, although they may not currently be as active as they were historically. The MPP also competes with the Federal Reserve to the extent it purchases MBS and affects market prices and the availability of supply.

Debt Issuance
The FHLBank System primarily competes with the U.S. government and other GSEs for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs.


HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our human capital is a significant contributor to the success of our strategic business objectives. As such, we are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant operating environment changes, safety protocols and procedures that we determined were in the best interest of our employees and members, and which comply with government regulations. This includes having nearly all employees work remotely, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing any on-site work.

In managing human capital, we focus on our workforce profile and the various programs and philosophies described below.

Workforce Profile
Our workforce is primarily comprised of corporate employees, with one location of principal operations. As of December 31, 2020, we had 241 employees. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 37 percent of our workforce was female, 63 percent male, 85 percent non-minority and 15 percent minority. Our workforce is leanly staffed, and historically has included a number of longer-tenured employees. As of December 31, 2020, the average tenure of our employees was 10 years. We strive to both develop talent from within the organization and supplement with external hires. We believe that developing talent internally results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes loyalty and commitment in our employee base, which furthers our success. However, adding new employees contributes to new ideas, continuous improvement, and our goals of a diverse and inclusive workforce. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit.

Total Rewards
We seek to attract, develop and retain talented employees to achieve our strategic business initiatives, enhance business performance and provide members with financial services and a competitive return on their capital investment. We strive to
17

Table of Contents
achieve this objective through a combination of development programs, benefits and employee wellness programs, and recognizing and rewarding performance. Specifically, our programs include:
Cash compensation – provides competitive salary, transportation and other cash subsidies, and performance based incentives.
Benefits – offers health insurance with a health savings account contribution, dental and vision insurance, life and AD&D insurance, supplemental life insurance, long-term disability insurance, employee assistance program, 401(k) retirement savings plan with employer match, and defined benefit pension benefits.
Recognition programs – sponsors peer-to-peer recognition program, department recognition program and company-wide recognition.
Work / life balance – provides flexible scheduling and time off programs for vacation, illness, personal, holiday, bereavement, jury duty, and paid leave programs for times when caring for a sick family member, bonding with a newborn or recovering from childbirth.
Culture – promotes the five core values of dependable, customer focused, inclusive, change oriented and results driven and encourages employee resource groups and other culture and inclusion initiatives.
Development programs and training – offers tuition assistance programs, internal educational and development opportunities, and fee reimbursement for external educational and development programs.
Management succession planning – assesses talent annually with our leadership and Board of Directors with, at a minimum, a defined plan for positions at Vice President and above.

Diversity and Inclusion Program
Diversity and inclusion is a strategic business priority. Our diversity and inclusion officer reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as a liaison to the Board of Directors, and is a member of the senior management strategy council. We recognize that diversity increases capacity for innovation and creativity and that inclusion allows us to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthen retention efforts. We operationalize our commitment through the development and execution of a three-year diversity and inclusion strategic plan that includes quantifiable metrics to measure its success. Our diversity and inclusion officer and team reports regularly on performance against the strategic plan to management and the Board of Directors. We offer a range of opportunities for our employees to connect, and grow personally and professionally through employee resource groups and community outreach. We consider learning an important component of our diversity and inclusion strategic plan and regularly offer educational opportunities to our employees. Employee job descriptions contain inclusive behavior expectations that increase with increasing responsibilities in the organization, and also are included as part of our annual performance management process.
18

Table of Contents

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

The following discussion summarizes risks and uncertainties we currently face. The realization of one or more of the risks could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition, safety and soundness, and, at the extreme, the viability of our business franchise. The effects could include reductions in Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings and dividends, and, at the extreme, impairment of our capital or an inability to participate in issuances of Consolidated Obligations. The risks identified below are not the only risks we face. Other risks not presently known or which we deem to be currently immaterial may also impact our business. Additionally, the risks identified may adversely affect our business in ways we do not expect or anticipate.


BUSINESS AND REGULATORY RISK

A prolonged economic downturn could further lower Mission Asset Activity and profitability.

Member demand for Mission Asset Activity depends in large part on the general health of the economy and overall business conditions. Numerous external factors can affect our Mission Asset Activity and earnings including:

the general state and trends of the economy and financial institutions, especially in the Fifth District;
conditions in the financial, credit, mortgage, and housing markets;
interest rates;
actions of the Federal Reserve to affect liquidity reserves of financial institutions and the money supply;
competitive alternatives to our products, such as retail deposits and other sources of wholesale funding;
regulations affecting our members' liquidity requirements;
the willingness and ability of financial institutions to expand lending; and
natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies (see the separate Risk Factor on the COVID-19 pandemic), terrorist attacks, civil unrest, or other unanticipated or catastrophic events could create economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties.

These external factors, some of which were experienced in 2020, are likely to have a more severe impact if a prolonged economic downturn is accompanied by significant changes in interest rates, stresses in the housing market, elevated competitive forces, or actual or potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment. Any of these factors, or a combination of factors, could adversely affect our business activities and results of operations and may ultimately cause stockholders to request redemption of a portion of their capital or request withdrawal from membership (both referred to in this document as “request withdrawal of capital”).

For example, we believe overall Advance demand has been and continues to be unfavorably affected by the substantial amount of deposit-based liquidity provided to financial institutions through the monetary actions of the Federal Reserve and changes in our members' ability to manage their regulatory liquidity requirements. The Federal Reserve’s policies facilitate liquidity and support stability in the fixed-income markets, which in turn has generally led to substantial deposit growth for our members and decreases in their demand for Advances. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information on recent market activity.

The competitive environment for our products could adversely affect business activities, including decreasing the level and utilization rates of Mission Asset Activity, earnings, and capitalization.

Our primary business is providing liquidity to our members by making Advances to, and purchasing mortgage loans from, our members. Members have access to alternative funding sources, including their customers' deposits and wholesale funding, which may offer more favorable terms than we offer, such as lower rates or more flexible credit or collateral standards. Some of our competitors are not subject to the same body of regulations applicable to us, which enables those competitors to offer products and terms that we are not able to offer. In addition, state and federal regulators’ perception of the stability and reliability of our Advances can also directly impact the amount of Advances used by members.

19

Table of Contents
In connection with purchasing mortgage loans from our members, we face competition in the areas of customer service, purchase prices for the MPP loans and ancillary services such as automated underwriting and loan servicing options. Our primary competitors are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, government agencies such as Ginnie Mae, and other secondary mortgage market conduits. In addition, our members continue to face increased competition in mortgage origination from non-bank financial institutions that are not eligible for FHLBank membership, which could reduce the amount of mortgage loans that members can make available to us to purchase.

Increased competition could decrease the amount of Advances and mortgage loans and narrow profitability, both of which could cause stockholders to request withdrawals of capital and ultimately result in a failure to meet our capital adequacy requirements.

In addition, the FHLBank System's offerings of debt compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, other GSEs, and corporate, state, and sovereign entities, among others. Increases in the supply and types of competing debt products or other regulatory factors could adversely affect the System's ability to access funding or increase the cost of our debt issuance. Either of these effects could in turn adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of FHLB membership.

Sharp reductions in Mission Asset Activity resulting from lower usage by large members, consolidation of large members, or continued shift in mortgage lending activities towards entities not eligible for FHLB membership could adversely impact our net income and dividends.

The amount of Mission Asset Activity and capital is concentrated among a small number of our large members. Additionally, the financial industry continues to consolidate and in recent years there has been a systemic trend of financial institutions that are currently ineligible for FHLB membership gaining an increasing market share, especially related to mortgage finance. However, the legislative and regulatory environment faced by the FHLBanks has not changed in response to this trend. Our members could decrease their Mission Asset Activity and the amount of their capital stock as a result of merger and acquisition activity or continued loss of market share to ineligible entities. At December 31, 2020, one member, U.S. Bank, N.A., held over 15 percent of our Advances and one member PFI, Union Savings Bank, accounted for over 30 percent of the outstanding MPP principal balance. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in Mission Asset Activity because we can undertake commensurate reductions in liability balances and capital and because of our relatively modest operating expenses. However, an extremely large and sustained reduction in Mission Asset Activity could affect our profitability and ability to pay competitive dividends, as well as, at the FHLBank System level, raise policy questions about the relevance of the FHLBank System in its traditional mission of supporting housing finance.

Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021 it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. In response, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) to 1) develop a robust alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR and 2) develop a plan to encourage its use in derivatives and other transactions as appropriate. The ARRC has settled on the establishment of SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018 and since then, the market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk. As many of our assets and derivatives are indexed to LIBOR, we have developed and implemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and balance sheet management.

In September 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter providing LIBOR transition guidance. Under the supervisory letter, the FHLBanks were directed, by December 31, 2019, to cease purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021, and, by March 31, 2020, to no longer enter into any other new LIBOR
20

Table of Contents
referenced financial assets, liabilities and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021. Except for investments and option embedded products, the ability to enter into new LIBOR referenced transactions was extended to June 30, 2020. As a result of the limitations introduced by the Finance Agency, we may experience less flexibility in our access to funding, higher funding costs, increased basis risk, lower overall demand or increased costs of Advances, and a lack of suitable investment alternatives. Accordingly, the composition of our balance sheet, capital stock level, primary mission assets ratio and net income may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the limitations within the supervisory letter may impact our ability to manage interest-rate risk, which may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

During the market transition away from LIBOR, LIBOR may experience increased volatility, and the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may also experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR. While market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop, the progress has been uneven and there can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely accepted and used across market segments and financial products in a timely manner or that any other alternative reference rate will be developed. Any disruption in the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR or another alternate reference rate could result in increased financial, operational, legal, reputational or compliance risks. We are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact the market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR may have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Executive Overview" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about the replacement of LIBOR.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related developments have created substantial economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties as well as significant operational changes, which could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic, and governmental and public actions taken in response (such as stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business closures), have reduced economic activity and created substantial uncertainty about the future economic environment. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the long-term effect that the COVID-19 pandemic may have and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the pandemic, including the depth of the economic downturn and the timing and shape of the economic recovery, is highly uncertain. This could increase many of the risks we face and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Prolonged periods of significant economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, may lead to an increased risk of credit losses, in particular due to decreases in the value of our mortgage loans held for portfolio or collateral securing our Advances or due to member financial difficulties or member failures, and may lead to an increased risk of counterparty defaults. The risk of credit losses may be exacerbated by a prolonged downturn in the residential and commercial real estate markets, including higher mortgage defaults or delinquencies due to rising unemployment and the effect of mortgage forbearance and other relief as well as financial difficulties or failures of mortgage servicers.

Additionally, a prolonged economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to further reduced demand for Advances. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, demand for Advances decreased significantly as a number of emergency actions taken by the Federal Reserve helped facilitate liquidity and support stability in the fixed-income markets and as members experienced substantial deposit growth. We believe that reduced demand for Advances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the near future.

Overall, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to, and may continue to cause, compression in our net interest income and net interest margin. To the extent interest rates continue to be low, or negative interest rates arise, our business and profitability may be further adversely affected.

Furthermore, stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions, and business shutdowns as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to substantial changes in normal business practices, such as the implementation of widespread work-from-home arrangements for us, as well as many of our members, dealers, investors, and third-party service providers. These changes have increased the risk of operational errors, disruptions and failures, and cybersecurity breaches. It is uncertain when and in what manner normal business operations may return, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct and manage our business.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations will depend on many factors that remain highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including, but not limited to:
21

Table of Contents
the duration, spread, and severity of the pandemic; additional fiscal stimulus and other measures taken in response to the pandemic; the actions taken to contain the pandemic, including the effectiveness of related vaccines and therapeutics; and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume.

Potential GSE reform could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

Due to our GSE status, the ultimate resolution to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could affect the FHLBanks. While there appears to be consensus that a permanent financial and political solution to the current conservatorship status should be implemented, which could include maintaining the current structure, no consensus has evolved to date around any of the various legislative proposals. Some policy proposals directed towards Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have included provisions applicable to the FHLBank System, such as limitations on Advances and portfolio investments. Other proposals have included broader changes in GSE mortgage finance, such as the FHLBank System being a greater participant in the secondary mortgage market, which could affect the FHLBank System's long-standing business model.

There are significant differences between the FHLBank System and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including the System's focus on lending as opposed to guaranteeing mortgages and its distinctive cooperative business model. GSE legislation could inadequately account for these differences. This could jeopardize the ability of the FHLBank System to continue operating effectively within its current business model, including by adversely changing the perceptions of the capital markets about the risk associated with the debt of housing GSEs. We cannot predict the effects on the System if GSE reform were to be enacted.

Changes in the regulatory and legislative environment could unfavorably affect our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition to potential GSE reform, the legislative and regulatory environment in which the System operates continues to undergo change. Recently-promulgated and future legislative and regulatory actions could significantly affect our business model, financial condition, or results of operations. Legislative and regulatory actions have also raised our operating costs and imparted added uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. We are unable at this time to predict the ultimate effects the regulatory environment could have on the FHLBank System's business model, our members' view on the value of the FHLBank membership, or on our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements mandated by Finance Agency regulations and supervisory guidance and by our internal policies, or not being able to pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock, may lower demand for Mission Asset Activity, harm results of operations, and lower membership value.

To ensure safe and sound operations, we must hold a minimum amount of capital relative to our asset levels. We must also hold a sufficient amount of retained earnings to help protect members' capital stock investment against impairment risk. If our capital levels fall significantly, we may be unable to pay dividends or redeem and repurchase capital stock in a timely manner (or at all). Such events could adversely affect the value of membership including causing impairment in the value of members' capital investment in our company. Outcomes could be: reduced demand for Mission Asset Activity, decreased profitability, requests from members to redeem a portion of their capital or to withdraw from membership, or increased investors' perception of the riskiness of our FHLB.


MARKET AND LIQUIDITY RISK

Changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds (together referred to as market risk exposure or interest rate risk exposure) could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Exposure of earnings to unhedged changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment speeds is one of our largest ongoing residual risks. We derive most of our income from the interest earned on assets less the interest paid on Consolidated Obligations and deposits used to fund the assets. Spreads on our assets tend to be narrow compared to those of many other financial institutions due to our cooperative business model. Market conditions, yield curve shape, competitive forces, and market risk exposure could cause these already narrow asset spreads to decline, which could substantially reduce our
22

Table of Contents
profitability. A key spread relationship is that we tend to utilize Consolidated Discount Notes to fund a significant amount of assets that have adjustable-rates tied to a benchmark interest rate, such as LIBOR or SOFR. Because rates on Discount Notes do not perfectly correlate with other adjustable benchmark interest rates, a narrowing of this spread, for example from investors changing perceptions about the quality of our debt, could lower income and reduce balances of Mission Asset Activity.

We hedge mortgage assets with a combination of Consolidated Obligations and derivatives transactions. Interest rate movements can lower profitability in two primary ways: 1) directly due to their impact on earnings from cash flow mismatches between assets and liabilities; and 2) indirectly via their impact on prepayment speeds on our MBS investments and mortgages purchased under our MPP, which can unfavorably affect the cash flow mismatches. The effects on income can also include acceleration in the amortization of purchased premiums on mortgage assets.

Because it is normally cost-prohibitive to completely mitigate market risk exposure, a residual amount of market risk normally remains after incorporating risk management activities. Sharp increases or decreases in interest rates could adversely affect us and our stockholders by making dividend rates less competitive relative to the returns available to members on alternative investments.

In some extremely stressful scenarios, changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds could result in dividends being below stockholders' expectations for an extended period of time and/or market capitalization ratios falling below par which could indicate potential impairment of member stock. In such a situation, members could engage in less Mission Asset Activity and could request a withdrawal of capital. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information about market risk exposure.

Impaired access to the capital markets for debt issuance could decrease the amount of Mission Asset Activity, lower earnings by raising debt costs and, at the extreme, prevent the System from meeting its financial obligations.

Our principal long-term source of funding, liquidity, and market risk management is through access on favorable terms to the capital markets for participation in the issuances of debt securities and execution of derivative transactions at prices and yields that are adequate to support our business model. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of Consolidated Obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, particularly the short-term capital markets, because we and the System normally have a large reliance on short-term funding. The System's strong debt ratings, the implicit U.S. government backing of our debt, strong investor demand for FHLBank System debt, and effective funding management are instrumental in ensuring satisfactory access to the capital markets.

We are exposed to liquidity risk if significant disruptions in the capital markets occur. Although the System was able to maintain access to the capital markets for debt issuances on acceptable terms during 2020, there is no assurance this will continue to be the case. Future ability to effectively access the capital markets on acceptable terms could be adversely affected by external events (such as general economic and financial instabilities, political instability, wars, natural disasters, pandemics or other widespread health emergencies, civil unrest or other unanticipated or catastrophic events), deterioration in the perception of financial market participants about the financial strength of Consolidated Obligations, or downgrades to the System's credit ratings. The System could also be affected by the continued changes in the capital markets in response to financial regulations and by the joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, which exposes the System as a whole to events at individual FHLBanks. If access to capital markets were to be impaired for an extended period, the effect on our financial condition and results of operations could be material. At the extreme, the System's ability to achieve its mission and satisfy its financial obligations could be threatened.


CREDIT RISK

We are exposed to credit risk that, if realized, could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We believe we have a de minimis overall amount of residual credit risk exposure related to Credit Services, purchases of investments, and transactions in derivatives, and a minimal amount of credit risk exposure related to the MPP. However, we can make no assurances that credit losses could not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations in all scenarios.
23

Table of Contents

The FHLB is an asset-based lender for Advances and Letters of Credit. Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and we have a perfected first lien position on collateral. However, we do not have full information on the characteristics of, nor do we estimate current market values on, a large portion of collateral. This results in a degree of uncertainty as to the precise amount of over-collateralization.

Our MPP consists of mortgage loans considered to have high credit quality and conservative underwriting and loan characteristics with additional credit enhancements in place designed to protect us against credit losses. The result has been a minimal amount of credit losses historically.

Although Advances and Letters of Credit are over-collateralized and mortgage loans in the MPP are of high credit quality with various credit enhancements, credit risk could increase under a number adverse scenarios, such as damage or destruction of collateral that members pledge to secure Advances or mortgages that we hold in the MPP as a result of natural disasters, which may be caused by the effects of climate change or other catastrophic events. Significant declines in the value of collateral pledged to secure Advances could lead to greater exposure to credit losses in the event of a member default. Additionally, significant and sustained reductions in home prices and sustained elevated levels of unemployment and other factors that influence delinquencies and defaults could increase the risk of credit losses in the MPP.

Some of our liquidity investments are unsecured, as are uncollateralized portions of certain derivatives. We make unsecured liquidity investments in and transact derivatives with highly rated, investment-grade institutions, have conservative limits on dollar and maturity exposure to each institution, and have strong credit underwriting practices. Failure of an investment or derivative counterparty with which we have a large unsecured position could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations. To the extent we engage in derivative transactions required to be cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), we may be exposed to nonperformance from central clearinghouses and Futures Commission Merchants.

Financial institutions are increasingly inter-related as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. As a result, actual or potential defaults of one or more financial institutions could lead to market-wide disruptions making it difficult for us to find qualified counterparties for transactions.

Financial difficulties at other FHLBanks could require us to provide financial assistance to another FHLBank, which could adversely affect our results of operations or our financial condition.

Each FHLBank has a joint and several liability for principal and interest payments on Consolidated Obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Although no FHLBank has ever defaulted on its principal or interest share of an Obligation, there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the case. Financial performance issues could require our FHLB to provide financial assistance to one or more other FHLBanks, for example, by making a payment on an Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank. Such assistance could adversely affect our financial condition, earnings, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock.


OPERATIONAL RISK

Failures of the Office of Finance could disrupt the ability to conduct and manage our business.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of Consolidated Obligations, among other things. Pursuant to Finance Agency regulations, the Office of Finance, often in conjunction with the FHLBanks, has adopted policies and procedures for the purposes of facilitating and approving the issuance of Consolidation Obligations. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's services as a result of breaches, cyberattacks, or technological risks could negatively affect the business operations of each FHLBank, including disruptions to the FHLBanks' access to funding through the sale of Consolidated Obligations. Although the Office of Finance has business continuity and security incident response plans in place, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted or otherwise negatively affected if the Office of Finance was not able to perform its functions for a period of time.

24

Table of Contents
Failures or interruptions in our information systems and other technologies, financial and business models, and third-party vendors could harm our financial condition, results of operations, reputation, and relations with members.

As a financial institution, we rely heavily on internal and third-party information systems and other technology to manage our business, including the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential borrower and financial information in computer systems and networks. For instance, due to our reliance on the book-entry system of the Federal Reserve Banks for debt issuance and servicing operations, we depend on them and their fiscal agent, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and one or more settlement agents to issue and make payments of principal and interest on Consolidated Obligations. Failures in information systems and other technologies could occur from human error, fraud, cyberattacks, errors or misuse of models and services we employ, lapses in operating processes, or natural or man-made disasters.

Computer systems, software and networks may be increasingly vulnerable to failures and interruptions from cyberattacks, which may include breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious or destructive code (such as ransomware) and other events against information owned by our company and customers. These failures and interruptions could jeopardize the confidentiality or integrity of information, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. Additionally, threats of cyber terrorism, external extremist parties, including state-sponsored actors, result in heightened risk exposure. The techniques used in cyber attacks change frequently and have grown increasingly sophisticated, and these attacks or ensuing security breaches could persist for an extended period of time before being detected. It could take considerable additional time for us to determine the scope, extent, amount, and type of information compromised. We can make no assurance that we will be able to prevent, timely and adequately address, or mitigate failures, interruptions, or cyberattacks in information systems and other technology. If we experience a failure, interruption, or cyberattack in any of these systems, we may be unable to effectively conduct or manage business activities, operating processes, and risk management, which could significantly harm customer relations, our reputation, and operating costs, potentially resulting in material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to foresee, prevent, mitigate, reverse or repair the negative effects of such failures, interruptions, cyberattacks, or cyber terrorism.

Our financial condition and results of operations could suffer if we are unable to hire and retain skilled key personnel.

We rely on key personnel for many of our functions and have a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of our business. The success of our mission depends, in large part, on the ability to attract and retain key personnel. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate a qualified and diverse pool of employees, both to maintain our current business, and to execute strategic initiatives. Competition for qualified people or ineffective succession planning could affect the ability to hire or retain effective key personnel, thereby harming our financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.Properties.

Our primary offices are located in approximately 79,000 square feet of leased space in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio. We also maintain a leased, fully functioning, back-up facility in suburban Cincinnati. We believe that our facilities are in good condition, well maintained, and adequate for our current needs.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.
25

Table of Contents

PART II


Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

By law our stock is not publicly traded, and only our members (and former members with a withdrawal notice pending) may own our stock. The par value of our capital stock is $100 per share. As of December 31, 2020, we had 649 member and former member stockholders and approximately 27 million shares of capital stock outstanding, all of which were Class B Stock.

We declared quarterly cash dividends in 2020 and 2019 as shown in the table below.
(Dollars in millions)
20202019
AnnualizedAnnualized
QuarterRateRate
First2.50 %6.00 %
Second2.50 5.50 
Third2.00 4.50 
Fourth2.00 4.00 
Total2.23 5.05 

Generally, the Board of Directors has discretion to declare or not declare dividends and to determine the rate of any dividend declared. Our policy states that dividends for a quarter are declared and paid from retained earnings after the close of a calendar quarter and are based on average stock balances for the then closed quarter. The Board of Directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by the financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings of the FHLB, and actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment including interest rates and the mortgage and credit markets. The dividend rate is generally referenced as a spread to average short-term interest rates experienced during the quarter to help assess a competitive level for our stockholders.

We may not declare a dividend if, at the time, we are not in compliance with all of our capital requirements. We also may not declare or pay a dividend if, after distributing the dividend, we would fail to meet any of our capital requirements or if we determine that the dividend would create a safety and soundness issue for the FHLB. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding our capital stock.


RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

We provide Letters of Credit in the ordinary course of business to support members' obligations issued in support of unaffiliated, third-party offerings of notes, bonds or other securities. We provided $1 million and $3 million of such credit support during 2020 and 2019. We did not provide such credit support during 2018. To the extent that these Letters of Credit are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, their issuance is exempt from registration pursuant to section 3(a)(2) thereof.

26

Table of Contents
Item 6.     Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents selected Statement of Condition data, Statement of Income data and financial ratios for the five years ended December 31, 2020.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)20202019201820172016
STATEMENT OF CONDITION DATA AT PERIOD END:
Total assets$65,296 $93,492 $99,203 $106,895 $104,635 
Advances25,362 47,370 54,822 69,918 69,882 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio9,549 11,236 10,502 9,682 9,150 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans (1)
— 
Investments (2)
27,041 34,389 33,614 27,058 25,334 
Consolidated Obligations, net:
Discount Notes27,500 49,084 46,944 46,211 44,690 
Bonds31,997 38,440 45,659 54,163 53,191 
Total Consolidated Obligations, net59,497 87,524 92,603 100,374 97,881 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock19 22 23 30 35 
Capital:
Capital stock - putable2,641 3,367 4,320 4,241 4,157 
Retained earnings1,304 1,094 1,023 940 834 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(15)(16)(13)(16)(13)
Total capital3,930 4,445 5,330 5,165 4,978 
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
Net interest income$406 $406 $499 $429 $363 
Non-interest income (loss)(7)(10)(37)(1)46 
Non-interest expense92 89 85 79 111 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 35 30 
Net income$276 $276 $339 $314 $268 
FINANCIAL RATIOS:
Dividend payout ratio (3)
30.3 %74.1 %75.6 %66.3 %63.9 %
Weighted average dividend rate (4)
2.23 5.05 5.88 5.00 4.00 
Return on average equity5.78 5.65 6.29 6.15 5.35 
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.25 
Net interest margin (5)
0.46 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.35 
Average equity to average assets5.39 5.04 5.11 5.00 4.76 
Regulatory capital ratio (6)
6.07 4.79 5.41 4.88 4.80 
Operating expenses to average assets (7)
0.080 0.070 0.063 0.060 0.061 
(1)The methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans changed on January 1, 2020 with the adoption of new accounting guidance on the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the prior periods have not been revised to conform to the new basis of accounting.
(2)Investments include interest-bearing deposits in banks, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.
(3)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared in the period as a percentage of net income.
(4)Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid divided by the average number of shares of capital stock eligible for dividends.
(5)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
(6)Regulatory capital ratio is period-end regulatory capital (capital stock, mandatorily redeemable capital stock and retained earnings) as a percentage of period-end total assets.
(7)Operating expenses comprise compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, which are included in non-interest expense.

27

Table of Contents
Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This discussion and analysis of the FHLB's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K.


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Recent Developments

COVID-19 Pandemic
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has impacted communities and businesses worldwide, including those in the Fifth District. The effects of COVID-19 continue to evolve, and the full impact and duration of the virus are unknown. Despite the uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic, we continued to fulfill our mission of providing robust access to a key source of readily available and competitively priced wholesale funding to member financial institutions and supporting our commitment to affordable housing and community investment, while maintaining strong capital and liquidity positions.

We have remained focused on the health and safety of our employees while maintaining full business operations. Employees are working from home with only a limited number of employees voluntarily working from our downtown Cincinnati location. Although there is no definitive date on when employees will return to the office, we have prepared health and safety policies and procedures to ensure our employees are able to return safely.

At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate impact of COVID-19 on our members, counterparties, vendors, and other third parties we rely upon to conduct our business. However, we continue to monitor the progression of COVID-19 and are committed to assisting members and their communities as impacts related to the pandemic continue to unfold.

Financial Condition

Mission Asset Activity
Mission Assets, which we define as Advances, Letters of Credit, and total MPP are the primary means by which we fulfill our mission with direct connections to members. We regularly monitor our balance sheet concentration of Mission Asset Activity. One measure we use to assess mission achievement is our Primary Mission Asset ratio, which measures the sum of average Advances and mortgage loans as a percentage of average Consolidated Obligations (adjusted for certain high-quality liquid assets, as permitted by regulation). In 2020, the Primary Mission Asset ratio averaged 75 percent, which exceeded the Finance Agency's preferred ratio of 70 percent. In assessing overall mission achievement, we also consider supplemental sources of Mission Asset Activity, the most significant of which is Letters of Credit issued to members.

The following table summarizes our Mission Asset Activity.
Year Ended December 31,
 Ending BalancesAverage Balances
(In millions)2020201920202019
Mission Asset Activity:
Advances (principal)$25,007 $47,264 $42,917 $47,894 
MPP:  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (principal)9,316 10,981 10,995 10,499 
Mandatory Delivery Contracts (notional)137 936 338 516 
Total MPP9,453 11,917 11,333 11,015 
Letters of Credit (notional)28,812 16,205 20,141 15,150 
Total Mission Asset Activity$63,272 $75,386 $74,391 $74,059 

At December 31, 2020, 64 percent of members held Mission Asset Activity, which was relatively stable compared to prior periods. The balance of Mission Asset Activity was $63.3 billion at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $12.1 billion (16 percent) from year-end 2019, which was primarily driven by lower Advance balances. Advance principal balances decreased $22.3
28

Table of Contents
billion (47 percent) from year-end 2019 primarily due to reduced borrowings by large-asset members as these members generally experienced an inflow of deposits on their balance sheets and increased access to other sources of liquidity in the financial markets. The decrease in the balance of Mission Asset Activity was partially offset by an increase of $12.6 billion (78 percent) in Letters of Credit balances from year-end 2019. The increase in Letters of Credit was due in part to members using Letters of Credit rather than securities to secure increased deposits from states and municipalities during the pandemic. We normally earn fees on Letters of Credit based on the actual average amount of the Letters utilized, which generally is less than the notional amount issued.

Average principal Advance balances for 2020 decreased only $5.0 billion (10 percent) compared to 2019 as Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the first quarter as the financial markets reacted to the pandemic. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the end of the third quarter of 2020. Advance balances are often volatile due to members' ability to quickly, normally on the same day, increase or decrease their amount of Advances. We believe providing members flexibility in their funding levels helps support their asset-liability management needs and is a key benefit of membership.

We believe that reduced demand for Advances from many of our members will, or is likely to, continue in the near future. Our business is designed to support significant changes in asset levels without having to undergo material changes in staffing, operations, risk practices, or general resource needs. A key reason for this scalability is that our Capital Plan provides for additional capital when Advances grow and the opportunity for us to retire capital when Advances decline, thereby acting, along with our efficient operating expenses, to preserve competitive profitability.

The MPP principal balance fell $1.7 billion (15 percent) from year-end 2019. During 2020, we purchased $2.6 billion of mortgage loans, while principal reductions of $4.3 billion reflected the significant increase in mortgage loan refinance activity in 2020.

Based on earnings in 2020, we accrued $31 million for the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) pool of funds to be available to members in 2021. In addition to the required AHP assessment, we provided voluntary sponsorship of three other housing programs during 2020. These programs provided funds to cover accessibility and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners, funds for the replacement or repair of homes damaged or destroyed by natural disasters within the Fifth District, and Advances at zero percent interest for COVID-19 related assistance.

Investments
The balance of investments at December 31, 2020 was $27.0 billion, a decrease of $7.3 billion from year-end 2019. At December 31, 2020, investments included $9.7 billion of MBS and $17.3 billion of other investments, which consisted primarily of highly-rated short-term instruments and longer-term U.S. Treasury and GSE obligations held for liquidity. All of our MBS held at December 31, 2020 were issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or a U.S. agency. The decline in the balance of investments at the end of 2020 was due to decreases in both MBS and liquidity investments. MBS balances declined due to an increase in prepayments of the underlying mortgages as a result of the low interest rate environment. Due to regulatory limitations regarding the purchase of MBS that reference LIBOR, we have not been able to fully replace the prepaid MBS with suitable alternatives. Liquidity investments decreased as we decided to hold more of our liquidity portfolio as deposits at the Federal Reserve at the end of 2020 in anticipation of volatile market conditions. At December 31, 2020, we held $3.0 billion in deposits at the Federal Reserve, which are reflected in cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition.

Investments averaged $32.9 billion in 2020, a decrease of $4.9 billion (13 percent) from year-end 2019. The decrease in average investments was primarily driven by the decrease in MBS balances described above. Liquidity investments can vary significantly on a daily basis during times of volatility in Advance balances. We maintained a robust amount of asset liquidity throughout 2020 across a variety of liquidity measures, as discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management."

Capital
Capital adequacy surpassed all minimum regulatory capital requirements in 2020. The GAAP capital-to-assets ratio at December 31, 2020 was 6.02 percent, while the regulatory capital-to-assets ratio was 6.07 percent. Both ratios exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. Regulatory capital includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock accounted for as a liability under GAAP. GAAP and regulatory capital both decreased $0.5 billion in 2020, primarily due to the repurchase of $2.3 billion of excess stock and members' redemption of $0.6 billion of stock in 2020. The repurchase and redemption of capital stock were partially offset by members' purchases of capital stock to support Advance growth at the end of the first quarter. Retained earnings totaled $1.3 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $0.2 billion (19 percent) from year-end 2019, which is a higher growth rate relative to recent years. The increase in retained earnings was due in part to the lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020.
29

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Overall Results
Our earnings reflect the combination of a stable business model and conservative management of risk. Key factors that can cause significant periodic volatility in our profitability are changes in the level of interest rates, changes in spreads between benchmark interest rates and our short-term funding costs, recognition of net amortization due to accelerated prepayments of mortgage assets, and fair value adjustments related to the use of derivatives and the associated hedged items. The table below summarizes our results of operations.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)202020192018
Net income$276 $276 $339 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 31 38 
Return on average equity (ROE)5.78 %5.65 %6.29 %
Return on average assets0.31 0.28 0.32 
Weighted average dividend rate2.23 5.05 5.88 
Average short-term interest rates (1)
0.51 2.24 2.07 
ROE spread to average short-term interest rates5.27 3.41 4.22 
Dividend rate spread to average short-term interest rates1.72 2.81 3.81 
(1)     Average short-term interest rates consist of 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate.

The historically low interest rate environment in 2020 had a significant impact on earnings. Low long-term interest rates resulted in a higher volume of mortgage refinance activity, which led to elevated levels of mortgage loan repayments and related premium amortization. Additionally, short-term interest rates declined sharply in early 2020 and continued at low levels for the remainder of the year, which lowered the earnings generated from investing our capital. Despite these declines, 2020 net income benefited from gains on the sale of interest rate swaptions during the first quarter of 2020 as well as higher prepayment fees on Advances in 2020. We use swaptions to hedge market risk exposure associated with holding fixed-rate mortgage assets and may sell swaptions as interest rates change in order to offset actual and anticipated risks.

Earnings levels continued to represent competitive returns on stockholders' capital investment. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in assets because we can execute commensurate changes in liability and capital stock balances. ROE was higher than average short-term rates in the periods presented above, while we maintained risk exposures in line with our appetite for a moderate risk profile. The spread between ROE and average short-term rates, which we compute using 3-month LIBOR and the Federal funds effective rate, is a market benchmark we believe member stockholders actively use to assess the competitiveness of the return on their capital investment.

In December 2020, we paid stockholders a quarterly dividend at a 2.00 percent annualized rate on their capital investment in our company, which is 1.84 percentage points above fourth quarter average short-term interest rates. The lower weighted average dividend rate in 2020 was due to the uncertainty surrounding the economic effects from the COVID-19 pandemic and its ultimate impact on our business and profitability, and to grow retained earnings to bolster the capital position going forward.

30

Table of Contents
Effect of Interest Rate Environment
Trends in market interest rates and the resulting shapes of the market yield curves strongly influence the results of operations and profitability because of how they affect members' demand for Mission Asset Activity, spreads on assets, funding costs and decisions in managing the tradeoffs in our market risk/return profile. The following table presents key market interest rates (obtained from Bloomberg L.P.).
 Year 2020Year 2019Year 2018
 EndingAverageEndingAverageEndingAverage
Federal funds effective0.09 %0.37 %1.55 %2.16 %2.40 %1.83 %
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)0.09 0.37 1.55 2.20 3.00 1.85 
3-month LIBOR0.24 0.65 1.91 2.33 2.81 2.31 
2-year LIBOR0.20 0.49 1.70 2.03 2.66 2.75 
10-year LIBOR0.93 0.88 1.90 2.09 2.71 2.95 
2-year U.S. Treasury0.12 0.39 1.57 1.97 2.49 2.52 
10-year U.S. Treasury0.92 0.89 1.92 2.14 2.69 2.91 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
0.65 1.17 2.28 2.52 3.06 3.20 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.28 1.64 2.71 2.95 3.51 3.65 
 Year 2020 by Quarter - Average
 Quarter 1Quarter 2Quarter 3Quarter 4
Federal funds effective1.25 %0.06 %0.09 %0.09 %
SOFR1.25 0.05 0.09 0.09 
3-month LIBOR1.54 0.61 0.25 0.22 
2-year LIBOR1.18 0.32 0.22 0.23 
10-year LIBOR1.34 0.69 0.65 0.87 
2-year U.S. Treasury1.10 0.19 0.14 0.15 
10-year U.S. Treasury1.38 0.68 0.65 0.86 
15-year mortgage current coupon (1)
1.86 1.09 0.86 0.88 
30-year mortgage current coupon (1)
2.31 1.58 1.32 1.37 
(1)     Simple average of current coupon rates of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac par MBS indications.

The target overnight Federal funds rate was in the range of zero to 0.25 percent at December 31, 2020, a decrease from the range of 1.50 to 1.75 percent at December 31, 2019. The low interest rate environment reflects the evolving risks to economic activity from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Average short-term rates were approximately 170 to 180 basis points lower in 2020 compared to 2019 and average long-term rates decreased by approximately 125 to 135 basis points during that same period. The decline in interest rates negatively impacted income in 2020 primarily because of the lower earnings generated from investing capital and the increased mortgage asset prepayments resulting in higher net amortization of premiums on those assets.

Business Outlook and Risk Management

This section summarizes the business outlook and what we believe are our current major risk exposures. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a detailed discussion of certain factors that could affect our corporate objectives, financial condition, and results of operations. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management" provides details on current risk exposures.

Strategic/Business Risk
Advances: Our business is cyclical and Mission Asset Activity normally declines in periods of economic contraction, when financial institutions have ample liquidity, or when there is significant growth in the money supply. Other factors that constrain widespread demand for Advances are the low levels of interest rates and competitiveness of Advances relative to deposits and other sources of wholesale funding.

In the last several years, the percentage of assets that members funded with Advances has shown little variation, in the range of two to four percent. We may see a broad-based increase in Advance demand if one or more of the following occur: aggregate
31

Table of Contents
loan portfolios of our members grow quicker than aggregate deposits, interest rates begin to increase over time, or changes in Federal Reserve policy reduce other sources of liquidity available to members.

MPP: MPP balances are influenced by conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, the competitiveness of prices we offer to purchase loans as well as program features, and activity from our largest sellers.

Our ongoing strategy for the MPP has two components: 1) increase the number of regular sellers and participants in the program; and 2) manage purchases and balances at a prudent level relative to capital and total assets to effectively manage market and credit risks consistent with our risk appetite.

Market Risk
During 2020, as in 2019, the market risk exposure to changing interest rates was moderate overall and well within policy limits. We believe that longer-term profitability would not become uncompetitive unless interest rates were to change quickly and significantly. In the short-term, profitability could become uncompetitive if long-term interest rates decrease in excess of 50 basis points leading to faster prepayments of mortgage assets, which would further accelerate the recognition of purchased premiums.

Capital Adequacy
We believe members place a high value on their capital investment in our company. Capital ratios at December 31, 2020, and all throughout the year, exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. We believe the amount of retained earnings is sufficient to protect against members' impairment risk of their capital stock investment in the FHLB and to provide the opportunity to stabilize or increase future dividends. Our capital policies and Capital Plan also have safeguards to ensure we meet regulatory and prudential capital requirements.

Credit Risk
In 2020, we continued to maintain a de minimis level of overall residual credit risk exposure from our Credit Services, investments, and derivative transactions. We believe policies and procedures related to credit underwriting, Advance collateral management, and transactions with investment and derivative counterparties continue to mitigate these risks. We have never experienced any credit losses, and we continue to have no loan loss reserves or impairment recorded for these instruments. Residual credit risk exposure in the mortgage loan portfolio was minimal.

Liquidity Risk
Our liquidity position remained strong during 2020, as did our overall ability to fund operations through the issuance of Consolidated Obligations at acceptable interest costs. Investor demand for FHLBank System debt continued to be robust. There were no substantive stresses on market access or liquidity from external market and political events. Although we can make no assurances, we believe there is only a remote possibility of a liquidity or funding crisis in the System that could impair our ability to participate, on a cost-effective basis, in issuances of new debt, service outstanding debt, maintain adequate capital levels, or pay competitive dividends.

Regulatory and Legislative Risk and Significant Developments
General: The FHLBank System is subject to legislative and regulatory oversight. Legislative and regulatory actions applicable, directly or indirectly, to the FHLBank System in the last decade have increased uncertainty regarding the business model and membership base under which the FHLBanks may operate in the future. This is due primarily to the uncertainty around potential future GSE reform, and the evolution of mortgage financing moving towards financial institutions currently not eligible for FHLBank membership. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for more discussion. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of GSE reform and whether our membership base will be legislatively and regulatorily permitted to evolve in concert with the housing finance market.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Brokered Deposits Restrictions:On January 22, 2021, the FDIC published a final rule, effective April 1, 2021, that amends its brokered deposits regulations that apply to less than well-capitalized insured depository institutions. The FDIC stated that the amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations and they establish a new framework for analyzing the deposit broker definition, which determines whether deposits placed through deposit placement arrangements qualify as brokered deposits. These deposit placement arrangements include those between insured depository institutions and third parties, such as financial technology companies, for a variety of business purposes, including access to deposits. The amendments to the FDIC's brokered deposit regulations, among other things, clarify what it means to be engaged in the business of facilitating the placement of deposits and expand the scope of the primary purpose exception. The rule amendments are expected to have the effect of narrowing the definition of deposit broker and excluding more deposits from treatment as brokered deposits. The amendments also establish an application and reporting
32

Table of Contents
process with respect to the primary purpose exception for businesses that do not meet one of several bright-line tests, and they affirm the FDIC’s position that the brokering of certificates of deposit constitutes deposit brokering.

This rule may have an effect on member demand for certain Advances, but we cannot predict the extent of the impact. We do not expect this rule to materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Housing Goals Amendments:On June 25, 2020, the Finance Agency published a final rule, effective August 24, 2020, amending the FHLBank housing goals regulation. Enforcement of the final rule will phase in over three years. The final rule eliminated the existing $2.5 billion volume threshold, such that all FHLBanks are subject to a new housing goal, regardless of their mortgage purchase volume. The new housing goal establishes one overall target level requiring 20 percent of an FHLBank's total mortgage purchases to be home-purchase mortgages for low- and very-low income families and low-income areas as well as refinancing mortgages for low-income families. The final rule also establishes a separate small member participation housing goal with a target level of 50 percent. The final rule provides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of the goals. We do not believe these changes will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Supervisory Letter - Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans as Collateral for FHLBank Advances:On April 23, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter (PPP Supervisory Letter) permitting the FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral for Advances as “Agency Securities,” given the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 100 percent guarantee of the unpaid principal balance. On April 20, 2020, the SBA's third interim final rule related to PPP loans was published. The rule explicitly waived certain regulatory requirements that must be satisfied before a member could pledge PPP loans to the FHLBanks as collateral. The PPP Supervisory Letter establishes a series of conditions under which the FHLBanks may accept PPP loans as collateral that focus on the financial condition of members, collateral discounts, and pledge dollar limits. On December 27, 2020, the President signed into law an extension of the PPP until March 21, 2021. The April 23, 2020 Supervisory Letter from the Finance Agency allowing us to accept PPP loans as collateral remains in effect.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act:The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The $2.2 trillion package was the largest stimulus bill in United States history. The CARES Act is in addition to previous relief legislation passed by Congress in March 2020. The legislation provides the following:
Assistance to businesses, states, and municipalities.
A loan program for small businesses, non-profits and physician practices that can be forgiven through employee retention incentives.
Treasury Secretary authority to make loans or loan guarantees to states, municipalities, and eligible businesses and loosens some regulations imposed through the Dodd-Frank Act.
Direct payments to eligible taxpayers and their families.
Expanded eligibility for unemployment insurance and payment amounts.
Mortgage forbearance provisions and a foreclosure moratorium.

Funding for the PPP, which was created by the CARES Act, was increased with the enactment of subsequent laws, most recently by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 27, 2020. Additional phases of the CARES Act or other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation may be enacted by Congress or other actions by the President, state governments, and governmental agencies. In connection with the foreclosure moratorium noted above, we have asked servicers of the mortgage loans we own to temporarily suspend all foreclosure sales and evictions, unless a home is vacant, in order to allow homeowners to stay in their homes during this period. We continue to monitor these actions and guidance as they evolve and to evaluate the potential impact to the U.S. economy; the impacts to mortgages held or serviced by our members that we accept as collateral; the impacts on our MPP portfolio; and the impacts to our overall business.

LIBOR Transition:We are planning for the replacement of LIBOR given that the FCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has established SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings. The market activity in SOFR-linked financial instruments has continued to develop and we have offered SOFR-linked Consolidated Obligations and SOFR-linked Advances on an ongoing basis. In addition, a SOFR-based derivatives market has begun to emerge and we have begun to use SOFR-based derivatives to manage interest-rate risk.

33

Table of Contents
As many of our assets and derivatives are still indexed to LIBOR, we have developed and implemented a LIBOR transition plan, which addresses considerations such as LIBOR exposure, fallback language, operational preparedness, and balance sheet management. Part of our LIBOR transition plan includes our previously implemented fallback language for LIBOR-indexed Advances and Consolidated Bonds in new and legacy contracts. As for our investments that are tied to LIBOR, we are monitoring market-wide efforts to enhance fallback language for new activity and develop frameworks to address existing transactions.

On October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), published a Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol). Both the Supplement and the Protocol were effective on January 25, 2021. As of that date, all legacy bilateral derivatives transactions subject to Protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference a covered Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR), including U.S. dollar LIBOR, were effectively amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation. We have adhered to the Protocol and have worked with our counterparties, as necessary, to address over-the-counter derivative agreements referencing U.S. dollar LIBOR as a part of our LIBOR transition efforts.

The Finance Agency has also issued supervisory letters designed to ensure the FHLBanks will be able to identify and prudently manage the risks associated with the termination of LIBOR in a safe and sound manner. As of June 30, 2020, the FHLBanks were required to cease entering into new LIBOR-based financial instruments that mature after December 31, 2021, except for investments and option embedded products. With respect to investments, the Finance Agency required the FHLBanks, by December 31, 2019, to stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. These phase-out dates did not apply to collateral accepted by the FHLBanks. As directed by the Finance Agency, the FHLBanks began requiring their members to report levels of LIBOR-linked collateral that mature after December 31, 2021. This will assist the FHLBanks in determining the level of member reliance on these assets to support borrowings, make decisions about their future eligibility and the impact of any incremental haircuts and asset value deterioration on borrowing capacity.

We have Advances, investment securities and derivatives with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. Each of these instruments are indexed to LIBOR settings that will no longer be provided after June 30, 2023, as noted above. The following table presents LIBOR-indexed Advances, investment securities and derivatives by contractual maturity at December 31, 2020.
(In millions)Maturing on or before June 30, 2023Maturing after June 30, 2023
LIBOR-Indexed Variable Rate Financial Instruments
Advances by redemption term$2,599 $3,012 
MBS by contractual maturity (1)
— 5,929 
Total principal amount$2,599 $8,941 
Derivatives, notional amount by termination date$9,339 $4,680 
(1)MBS are presented by contractual maturity; however, their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

The market transition away from LIBOR towards SOFR is gradual and complicated, including the possible development of term structures and credit adjustments to accommodate differences between LIBOR and SOFR. As such, we are not currently able to predict the ultimate impact of such a transition on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

34

Table of Contents
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Credit Services

Credit Activity and Advance Composition
The table below shows trends in Advance balances by major programs and in the notional amount of Letters of Credit.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable Rate-Indexed:    
LIBOR$5,611 22 %$10,430 22 %
SOFR118 500 
Other82 — 221 
Total5,811 23 11,151 24 
Fixed-Rate:    
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 19,386 41 
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 11,476 24 
Putable (2)
2,657 11 1,444 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,358 
Other1,151 1,449 
Total19,196 77 36,113 76 
Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$47,264 100 %
Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $16,205 
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020September 30, 2020June 30, 2020March 31, 2020
 Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Balance
Percent(1)
Adjustable/Variable-Rate Indexed:  
LIBOR$5,611 22 %$5,846 22 %$21,071 44 %$28,889 36 %
SOFR118 116 — 116 — 2,000 
Other82 — 123 83 — 247 — 
Total5,811 23 6,085 23 21,270 44 31,136 39 
Fixed-Rate:  
Repurchase based (REPO)3,780 15 3,896 15 8,978 18 28,058 35 
Regular Fixed-Rate9,587 38 10,207 38 11,445 24 14,452 18 
Putable (2)
2,657 11 3,107 12 3,164 3,164 
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched2,021 2,195 2,309 2,439 
Other1,151 1,158 1,241 680 
Total19,196 77 20,563 77 27,137 56 48,793 61 
Total Advances Principal$25,007 100 %$26,648 100 %$48,407 100 %$79,929 100 %
Letters of Credit (notional)$28,812 $23,011 $22,381 $15,785 
(1)As a percentage of total Advances principal.    
(2)Excludes Putable Advances where the related put options have expired or where the Advance is indexed to a variable-rate. These Advances are classified based on their current terms.

Advance balances at December 31, 2020 decreased 47 percent compared to year-end 2019. Advance balances declined in 2020 as large-asset members reduced their borrowings. The reduction in borrowings was primarily driven by these members generally experiencing an inflow of deposits on their balance sheets, while also having access to other liquidity sources as a result of certain government actions related to the pandemic. Despite the overall decline, Advances spiked across our membership at the end of the first quarter of 2020 as the financial markets reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic, and members
35

Table of Contents
turned to us for liquidity, primarily in the form of LIBOR and REPO Advances. Most of these Advances matured or prepaid by the end of 2020.

Advance Usage
In addition to analyzing Advance balances by dollar trends, we monitor the degree to which members use Advances to fund their balance sheets. The following table shows the unweighted, average ratio of each member's Advance balance to its most-recently available figures for total assets.
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Average Advances-to-assets for members 
Assets less than $1.0 billion (514 members)1.99 %2.55 %
Assets over $1.0 billion (114 members)2.11 3.31 
All members2.01 2.67 

The following table shows Advance usage of members by charter type.

(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Principal Amount of AdvancesPercent of Total Principal Amount of AdvancesPrincipal Amount of AdvancesPercent of Total Principal Amount of Advances
Commercial Banks$9,530 38 %$31,590 67 %
Savings Institutions4,922 20 5,689 12 
Credit Unions1,344 1,307 
Insurance Companies9,201 37 8,629 18 
Community Development Financial Institutions— — — 
Total member Advances24,997 100 47,216 100 
Former member borrowings10 — 48 — 
Total principal amount of Advances$25,007 100 %$47,264 100 %

The following tables present principal balances for the five members with the largest Advance borrowings.
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
NamePrincipal Amount of AdvancesPercent of Total Principal Amount of Advances NamePrincipal Amount of AdvancesPercent of Total Principal Amount of Advances
U.S. Bank, N.A.$4,273 17 % U.S. Bank, N.A.$13,874 29 %
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,443 14  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.4,500 10 
Nationwide Life Insurance Company2,062  Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,883 
Protective Life Insurance Company1,955  First Horizon Bank2,200 
Western-Southern Life Assurance Co.1,344  Pinnacle Bank2,063 
Total of Top 5$13,077 52 % Total of Top 5$26,520 56 %

Advance concentration ratios are influenced by, and generally similar to, concentration ratios of financial activity among our Fifth District financial institutions. We believe that having large financial institutions that actively use our Mission Assets augments the value of membership to all members. For example, such activity improves our operating efficiency, increases our earnings and thereby contributions to housing and community investment programs. This activity may enable us to obtain more favorable funding costs, and helps us maintain competitively priced Mission Assets.

36

Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio (Mortgage Purchase Program, or MPP)

The table below shows principal purchases and reductions of loans in the MPP for each of the last two years.
(In millions)20202019
Balance, beginning of year$10,981 $10,272 
Principal purchases2,626 2,631 
Principal reductions(4,291)(1,922)
Balance, end of year$9,316 $10,981 

Although there were 82 active members participating in the MPP during 2020, approximately 50 percent of the principal purchases in 2020 resulted from activity of our seven largest sellers. All loans acquired in 2020 were conventional loans.

The following tables show the percentage of principal balances from Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) supplying five percent or more of total principal and the percentage of principal balances from all other PFIs. As shown below, MPP activity is concentrated amongst a few members.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
 Principal% of Total Principal% of Total
Union Savings Bank$2,826  30 % Union Savings Bank$3,574  33 %
Guardian Savings Bank FSB796   Guardian Savings Bank FSB1,004  
All others5,694 61 FirstBank714 
Total$9,316 100 %All others5,689 51 
Total$10,981 100 %

We closely track the refinancing incentives of our mortgage assets (including loans in the MPP and MBS) because the option for homeowners to change their principal payments normally represents the largest portion of our market risk exposure and can affect MPP balances. MPP principal paydowns increased in 2020 to a 30 percent annual constant prepayment rate, compared to the 14 percent rate for all of 2019, driven by reductions in mortgage rates. MPP yields on purchases in 2020, after consideration of funding and hedging costs, continued to offer favorable returns. However, MPP yields on existing portfolio balances, net of funding and hedging costs, have declined and are expected to remain at lower levels in the short-term due to the increased prepayment speeds noted above. Despite the lower yields on existing MPP balances, the metrics of portfolio return relative to their market and credit risks continue to indicate that the MPP has generated, and can be expected to continue to generate, a profitable long-term, risk-adjusted return.

Housing and Community Investment

In 2020, we accrued $31 million of earnings for the Affordable Housing Program, which will be awarded to members in 20202021 through either our competitive or Welcome Home programs. This amount represents a decrease of $7 million from 2018 due to the lower earnings in 2019.

Including funds available in 20192020 from previous years, we had $32$28 million available for the competitive Affordable Housing Program in 2019,2020, which we awarded to 5349 projects through a single competitive offering. In addition, we disbursed nearly $13over $11 million to 189178 members on behalf of 2,5192,206 homebuyers through the Welcome Home Program, which assists homebuyers with down payments and closing costs. In total, more than one-thirdapproximately 40 percent of members applied for funding under the two Affordable Housing Programs.

Additionally, in 2019,2020, our Board committed $2.1$2.0 million to the Carol M. Peterson Housing Fund, which helped 303332 homeowners, and continued its commitment to the $5 million Disaster Reconstruction Program. BothFurthermore, in support of our members during the COVID-19 pandemic, we created a new Advance program that offered Advances with terms up to six months at zero percent interest to members between May 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. These Advances supported COVID-19 related assistance made by all Fifth District members. In 2020, we issued a total of $183 million of these Advances of which $34 million remained outstanding at December 31, 2020. The Carol M. Peterson Housing Fund, Disaster Reconstruction Program and COVID-19 related Advances are all voluntary programs beyond the 10 percent of earnings that we are required by law to set aside for the Affordable Housing Program.

37

Table of Contents
Our activities to support affordable housing and economic development also include offering Advances through the Affordable Housing Program, Community Investment Program and Economic Development Program with below-market interest rates at or near funding costs. At the end of 2019,2020, Advance balances under these programs totaled $360$302 million.


Investments

The table below presents the ending and average balances of our investment portfolio.
(In millions)2020 2019
 Ending Balance Average Balance Ending Balance Average Balance
Liquidity investments$17,285  $20,548  $20,924  $22,525 
MBS9,756  11,864  13,465  15,029 
Other investments (1)
— 459 232 
Total investments$27,041 $32,871 $34,389 $37,786 
(In millions)2019 2018
 Ending Balance Average Balance Ending Balance Average Balance
Liquidity investments$20,924
 $22,525
 $17,858
 $13,989
MBS13,465
 15,029
 15,756
 15,741
Other investments (1)

 232
 
 64
Total investments$34,389
 $37,786
 $33,614
 $29,794
(1)The average balance includes the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.
(1)The average balance includes the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.

Liquidity investments are either short-term (primarily overnight), or longer-term, but can be easily sold and converted to cash. It is normal for liquidity investments to vary by up to several billion dollars on a daily basis. Liquidity investment levels can vary significantly based on changes in the amount of actual Advances, anticipated demand for Advances, liquidity needs, the availability of acceptable net spreads, and the number of eligible counterparties that meet our unsecured credit risk criteria.

The increasebalance of liquidity investments was lower at December 31, 2020 compared to year-end 2019 as we decided to hold more of our liquidity portfolio as deposits at the Federal Reserve in anticipation of volatile market conditions. At December 31, 2020, we held $3.0 billion in deposits at the Federal Reserve, which are reflected in cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition. The average balance of liquidity investments in 2020 and 2019 was driven by volatility in short-termwere ample and variable-rate Advance borrowings and the purchases ofrelatively stable as we continued to hold U.S. Treasury obligations to help meet new regulatory liquidity requirements that went into effect on March 31, 2019.requirements. Under the new regulatory requirements, liquidity includes certain high-quality liquid assets, which are defined as U.S. Treasury obligations with remaining maturities of 10 years or less held as trading securities or available-for-sale securities.

Our overarching strategy for balances of MBS is to keep holdings as close as possible to the regulatory maximum, subject to the availability of securities that we believe provide acceptable risk/return tradeoffs.maximum. Finance Agency regulations prohibit us from purchasing MBS if our investment in these securities exceeds three times regulatory capital on the day we intend to purchase the securities. The ratio of MBS to regulatory capital was 3.002.46 at December 31, 20192020. The MBS ratio was lower than normal primarily due to the decline in MBS balances given paydowns in the low interest rate environment and the regulatory limitations regarding the purchase of investments that reference LIBOR. Given these limitations, we have not been able to fully replace the prepaid MBS with suitable alternatives that we believe provide an acceptable risk/return tradeoff.
.

The balance of MBS at December 31, 20192020 consisted of $11.8$8.7 billion of securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (of which $7.8$5.9 billion were floating-rate securities), $0.3 billion of floating-rate securities issued by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and $1.4$1.0 billion of securities issued by Ginnie Mae (which are primarily fixed rate). At December 31, 2019, the floating-rate MBS issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the NCUA were indexed to LIBOR. As noted in the "Business Outlook and Risk Management" section of the "Executive Overview," on December 31, 2019, we stopped purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021.
The table below shows principal purchases and paydowns of our MBS for each of the last two years.
(In millions)MBS Principal
20202019
Balance, beginning of year$13,447 $15,734 
Principal purchases149 1,205 
Principal paydowns(3,851)(3,492)
Balance, end of year$9,745 $13,447 
(In millions)MBS Principal
 2019 2018
Balance, beginning of year$15,734
 $14,746
Principal purchases1,205
 3,839
Principal paydowns(3,492) (2,851)
Balance, end of year$13,447
 $15,734

MBS principal paydowns in 20192020 equated to a 2027 percent annual constant prepayment rate, up from the 1620 percent rate experienced in 2018.2019. The higher prepayment rate experienced in 20192020 is a result of the decline inhistorically low mortgage rates throughout the first three quartersrate environment.

38

Table of 2019.Contents


Consolidated Obligations

We fund variable-rate assets with Discount Notes (a portion of which aremay be swapped), adjustable-rate Bonds, and swapped fixed-rate Bonds because they give us the ability to effectively match the underlying rate reset periods embedded in these assets. The balances and composition of our Consolidated Obligations tend to fluctuate with changes in the balances and composition of our assets. In addition, changes in the amount and composition of our funding may be necessary from time to time to meet the days positive liquidity and asset/liability maturity funding gap requirements under the new regulatory liquidity guidance discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management."

The table below presents the ending and average balances of our participations in Consolidated Obligations.
(In millions)2020 2019
 Ending Balance Average Balance Ending Balance Average Balance
Discount Notes:       
Unswapped$27,503  $39,478  $36,776  $39,286 
Swapped— 3,843 12,401 5,291 
Total par Discount Notes27,503 43,321 49,177 44,577 
Other items (1)
(3) (37) (93) (95)
Total Discount Notes27,500  43,284  49,084  44,482 
Bonds:       
Unswapped fixed-rate18,940  21,288  22,420  24,423 
Unswapped adjustable-rate (2)
10,639  13,394  11,012  16,132 
Swapped fixed-rate2,372  3,547  4,949  5,310 
Total par Bonds31,951  38,229  38,381  45,865 
Other items (1)
46  68  59  44 
Total Bonds31,997  38,297  38,440  45,909 
Total Consolidated Obligations (3)
$59,497  $81,581  $87,524  $90,391 
(In millions)2019 2018
 Ending Balance Average Balance Ending Balance Average Balance
Discount Notes:       
Unswapped$36,776
 $39,286
 $47,071
 $49,273
Swapped12,401
 5,291
 
 
Total par Discount Notes49,177
 44,577
 47,071
 49,273
Other items (1)
(93) (95) (127) (88)
Total Discount Notes49,084
 44,482
 46,944
 49,185
Bonds:       
Unswapped fixed-rate22,420
 24,423
 25,982
 26,566
Unswapped adjustable-rate (2)
11,012
 16,132
 15,470
 16,967
Swapped fixed-rate4,949
 5,310
 4,195
 5,982
Total par Bonds38,381
 45,865
 45,647
 49,515
Other items (1)
59
 44
 12
 (13)
Total Bonds38,440
 45,909
 45,659
 49,502
Total Consolidated Obligations (3)
$87,524
 $90,391
 $92,603
 $98,687
(1)Includes unamortized premiums/discounts, fair value option valuation adjustments, hedging and other basis adjustments.
(1)Includes unamortized premiums/discounts, fair value option valuation adjustments, hedging and other basis adjustments.
(2)Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds are indexed to either LIBOR or SOFR. At December 31, 2019, 1 percent were indexed to LIBOR and 99 percent were indexed to SOFR. At December 31, 2018, 69 percent were indexed to LIBOR and 31 percent were indexed to SOFR.
(3)
(2)Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds are indexed to either LIBOR or SOFR. At December 31, 2020, 100 percent were indexed to SOFR. At December 31, 2019, 1 percent were indexed to LIBOR and 99 percent were indexed to SOFR.
(3)The 11 FHLBanks have joint and several liability for the par amount of all of the Consolidated Obligations issued on their behalves. The par amount of the outstanding Consolidated Obligations for all of the FHLBanks was (in millions) $746,772 and $1,025,895 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

$1,025,895 and $1,031,617 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The balances of Consolidated Obligations were relatively stable in the periods shown above with fluctuations resulting from changes in the balances of our assets. Beginning in the third quarter of 2019, we began swapping term Discount Notes to adjustable-rates tied to the overnight Federal funds effective rate in order to reduce the repricing riskending balance of Discount Notes being usedwas lower at December 31, 2020 compared to fund certain overnightyear-end 2019 due to the reduction in short-term and shorter-term assets.variable-rate Advances in the last three quarters of 2020. Additionally, given our preference to use unswapped Discount Notes and unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds in the current market environment, we had no swapped Discount Notes outstanding at December 31, 2020. The average balance of Discount Notes in 2020 was significantly higher compared to the balance at the end of 2020 due to the growth in short-term and variable-rate Advances across our membership at the end of the first quarter of 2020 as the financial markets reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The average balance of unswapped fixed-rate Bonds, which typically have initial maturities greater than one year, declined in 20192020 compared to 2018 driventhe average balance in part by the continued run-off and replacement2019 due to terminating higher coupon fixed-rate Bonds with embedded options as interest rates fell.

39

Table of fixed rate MBS with adjustable rate products that require adjustable rate funding along with expanded use of derivatives to mitigate the interest rate exposure associated with existing fixed rate mortgage assets.Contents

The following table shows the allocation on December 31, 20192020 of unswapped fixed-rate Bonds according to their final remaining maturity and next call date (for callable Bonds). We believe that the allocations of Bonds among these classifications provide effective mitigation of market risk exposure to both higher and lower interest rates.
(In millions)Year of MaturityYear of Next Call
 CallableNoncallableTotalCallable
Due in 1 year or less$— $5,797 $5,797 $4,292 
Due after 1 year through 2 years25 2,662 2,687 120 
Due after 2 years through 3 years936 2,363 3,299 — 
Due after 3 years through 4 years540 1,253 1,793 — 
Due after 4 years through 5 years1,182 728 1,910 — 
Thereafter1,729 1,725 3,454 — 
Total$4,412 $14,528 $18,940 $4,412 
(In millions)Year of Maturity Year of Next Call
 CallableNoncallableTotal Callable
Due in 1 year or less$876
$5,387
$6,263
 $5,038
Due after 1 year through 2 years1,203
3,247
4,450
 130
Due after 2 years through 3 years261
2,644
2,905
 19
Due after 3 years through 4 years780
2,343
3,123
 
Due after 4 years through 5 years287
1,253
1,540
 
Thereafter1,780
2,359
4,139
 
Total$5,187
$17,233
$22,420
 $5,187

Deposits

Total deposits with us are normally a relatively minor source of low-cost funding. Total interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 20192020 were $0.9$1.3 billion, an increase of $0.3$0.4 billion from year-end 2018.2019.

Derivatives Hedging Activity and Liquidity

Our use of derivatives is discussed in the "Effect of the Use of Derivatives on Net Interest Income" sectionand "Non-Interest Income (Loss)" sections in "Results of Operations." Liquidity is discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management.”

Capital Resources

The following tables present capital amounts and capital-to-assets ratios, on both a GAAP and regulatory basis. We consider the regulatory ratio to be a better representation of financial leverage than the GAAP ratio because, although the GAAP ratio treats mandatorily redeemable capital stock as a liability, it protects investors in our debt in the same manner as GAAP capital stock and retained earnings.
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2020 2019
Period End Average Period End Average
GAAP and Regulatory Capital
GAAP Capital Stock$2,641  $3,567  $3,367  $3,827 
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock19  55  22  25 
Regulatory Capital Stock2,660  3,622  3,389  3,852 
Retained Earnings1,304  1,228  1,094  1,069 
Regulatory Capital$3,964  $4,850  $4,483  $4,921 
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2019 2018
 Period End Average Period End Average
GAAP and Regulatory Capital       
GAAP Capital Stock$3,367
 $3,827
 $4,320
 $4,387
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock22
 25
 23
 30
Regulatory Capital Stock3,389
 3,852
 4,343
 4,417
Retained Earnings1,094
 1,069
 1,023
 1,025
Regulatory Capital$4,483
 $4,921
 $5,366
 $5,442
2020 2019
 Period EndAverage Period EndAverage
GAAP and Regulatory Capital-to-Assets Ratio
GAAP6.02 % 5.39 % 4.75 % 5.04 %
Regulatory (1)
6.07  5.47  4.79  5.08 
(1)    At all times, the FHLBanks must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio.

40

 2019 2018
 Period End Average Period End Average
GAAP and Regulatory Capital-to-Assets Ratio       
GAAP4.75% 5.04% 5.37% 5.11%
Regulatory (1)
4.79
 5.08
 5.41
 5.16
Table of Contents
(1)At all times, the FHLBanks must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio.


The following table presents the sources of change in regulatory capital stock balances in 20192020 and 2018.2019.

(In millions)2019 2018(In millions)20202019
Regulatory stock balance at beginning of year$4,343
 $4,271
Regulatory stock balance at beginning of year$3,389 $4,343 
Stock purchases:   Stock purchases:
Membership stock157
 25
Membership stock25 157 
Activity stock435
 413
Activity stock2,110 435 
Stock repurchases/redemptions:   Stock repurchases/redemptions:
Redemption of member excess
 (40)Redemption of member excess(558)— 
Repurchase of member excess(1,538) (297)Repurchase of member excess(2,300)(1,538)
Withdrawals(8) (29)Withdrawals(6)(8)
Regulatory stock balance at the end of the year$3,389
 $4,343
Regulatory stock balance at the end of the year$2,660 $3,389 

Members' purchases of capital stock in 2020 were primarily to support Advance growth at the end of the first quarter. However, the decrease in GAAP and regulatory capital balances was primarily due to our repurchase of excess capital stock as Advance balances subsequently declined.

The table below shows the amount of excess capital stock.

(In millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018(In millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Excess capital stock (Capital Plan definition)$37
 $1,015
Excess capital stock (Capital Plan definition)$228  $37 
Cooperative utilization of capital stock$781
 $558
Cooperative utilization of capital stock$380  $781 
Mission Asset Activity capitalized with cooperative capital stock$19,536
 $13,950
Mission Asset Activity capitalized with cooperative capital stock$9,499  $19,536 

A portion of our capital stock is excess, meaning it is not required as a condition to being a member and is not currently capitalizing Mission Asset Activity. Excess capital stock provides a base of capital to manage financial leverage at prudent levels, augments loss protections for bondholders, and may be used to capitalize a portion of growth in Mission Assets. Throughout 2019,At December 31, 2020, the amount of excess stock, as defined by our Capital Plan, was $228 million, an increase of $191 million from year-end 2019. The balance of excess stock grew as Advance balances decreased. In ordermany Advances matured or prepaid in the second and third quarters of 2020.

Prior to help manageJanuary 1, 2021, if an individual member's excess stock reached zero, our capital and financial performance, we repurchased over $1.5 billionCapital Plan had permitted us, with certain limits, to capitalize additional Mission Asset Activity of that member with excess stock owned by other members, which is reflected as cooperative utilization of capital stock in 2019. As a result, excess stock decreased $978 million from year-end 2018. The repurchase of excess stock also resulted in decreasesthe table above. Effective with the most recently amended Capital Plan, members are no longer able to GAAP and regulatoryuse this cooperative capital balances and the related capital-to-assets ratios.for marginal new business.

See the "Capital Adequacy" section in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” for discussion of our retained earnings.

Membership and Stockholders

In 2019,2020, we added 11seven new member stockholders and lost 1719 member stockholders, ending the year at 640628 member stockholders. The decline in membership during 20192020 was primarily attributable to intra-district merger activity.

In 2019,2020, there were no material changes in the allocation of membership by state, charter type, or asset size. At the end of 2019,2020, the composition of membership by state was Ohio with 301, Kentucky with 171,165, and Tennessee with 168.162.

41

The following table provides the number of member stockholders by charter type.

December 31, December 31,
2019 2018 20202019
Commercial Banks365
 374
Commercial Banks351 365 
Savings Institutions81
 83
Savings Institutions78 81 
Credit Unions136
 134
Credit Unions140 136 
Insurance Companies52
 48
Insurance Companies53 52 
Community Development Financial Institutions6
 7
Community Development Financial Institutions
Total640
 646
Total628 640 


The following table provides the ownership of capital stock by charter type.

(In millions)December 31,(In millions)December 31,
2019 2018 20202019
Commercial Banks$2,296
 $3,353
Commercial Banks$1,459 $2,296 
Savings Institutions365
 353
Savings Institutions398 365 
Credit Unions175
 176
Credit Unions179 175 
Insurance Companies530
 437
Insurance Companies604 530 
Community Development Financial Institutions1
 1
Community Development Financial Institutions
Total GAAP Capital Stock3,367
 4,320
Total GAAP Capital Stock2,641 3,367 
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock22
 23
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock19 22 
Total Regulatory Capital Stock$3,389
 $4,343
Total Regulatory Capital Stock$2,660 $3,389 

Credit union members hold relatively less stock than their membership proportion because they tend to be smaller than the average member and borrow less. Insurance company members hold relatively more stock than their membership proportion because they tend to be larger than the average member and borrow more.

The following table provides a summary of member stockholders by asset size.

December 31, December 31,
Member Asset Size (1)
2019 2018
Member Asset Size (1)
20202019
Up to $100 million162
 166
Up to $100 million147 162 
> $100 up to $500 million307
 319
> $100 up to $500 million297 307 
> $500 million up to $1 billion74
 72
> $500 million up to $1 billion70 74 
> $1 billion97
 89
> $1 billion114 97 
Total Member Stockholders640
 646
Total Member Stockholders628 640 
(1)The December 31 membership composition reflects members' assets as of the most-recently available figures for total assets.
(1)    The December 31 membership composition reflects members' assets as of the most-recently available figures for total assets.

Most members are smaller community financial institutions, with 7371 percent having assets up to $500 million. As noted elsewhere, having larger members is important to help achieve our mission objectives, including providing valuable products and services to all members.

42


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following tables and discussion provide information for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017a comparison of the results between 2020 and 2019. For a comparison of the results between 2019 and 2018. For a comparison of the results between 2018, and 2017, see Part II, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our 20182019 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Components of Earnings and Return on Equity

The following table is a summary income statement for the last three years. Each ROE percentage is computed by dividing income or expense for the category by the average amount of stockholders' equity for the period.

(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017
 Amount 
ROE (1)
 Amount 
ROE (1)
 Amount 
ROE (1)
Net interest income$406
 8.31 % $499
 9.24 % $429
 8.42 %
Provision for credit losses
 
 
 
 
 0.01
Net interest income after provision for credit losses406
 8.31
 499
 9.24
 429
 8.41
Non-interest income (loss):           
Net gains (losses) on investment securities210
 4.30
 7
 0.13
 
 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(178) (3.64) (41) (0.75) (24) (0.48)
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option(54) (1.10) (14) (0.26) 10
 0.20
Other non-interest income, net12
 0.23
 11
 0.20
 13
 0.25
Total non-interest income (loss)(10) (0.21) (37) (0.68) (1) (0.03)
Total income396
 8.10
 462
 8.56
 428
 8.38
Non-interest expense89
 1.82
 85
 1.57
 79
 1.54
Affordable Housing Program assessments31
 0.63
 38
 0.70
 35
 0.69
Net income$276
 5.65 % $339
 6.29 % $314
 6.15 %
(1)The ROE amounts have been computed using dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may produce nominally different results.

(Dollars in millions)202020192018
 Amount
ROE (1)
Amount
ROE (1)
Amount
ROE (1)
Net interest income$406 8.51 %$406 8.31 %$499 9.24 %
Non-interest income (loss):
Net gains (losses) on investment securities257 5.39 210 4.30 0.13 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(273)(5.72)(178)(3.64)(41)(0.75)
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option(7)(0.15)(54)(1.10)(14)(0.26)
Other non-interest income, net16 0.33 12 0.23 11 0.20 
Total non-interest income (loss)(7)(0.15)(10)(0.21)(37)(0.68)
Total income399 8.36 396 8.10 462 8.56 
Non-interest expense92 1.93 89 1.82 85 1.57 
Affordable Housing Program assessments31 0.65 31 0.63 38 0.70 
Net income$276 5.78 %$276 5.65 %$339 6.29 %

(1)The ROE amounts have been computed using dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may produce nominally different results.

Details on the individual factors contributing to the level and changes in profitability are explained in the sections below.

Net Interest Income
The largest component of net income is net interest income. Our principal goal in managing net interest income is to balance the trade-offs between maintaining a moderate market risk profile and ensuring profitability remains competitive. Effective risk/return management requires us to focus principally on the relationships among assets and liabilities that affect net interest income, rather than individual balance sheet and income statement accounts in isolation.

Our ROE normally is lower than that of many other financial institutions because of the cooperative wholesale business model that results in narrow spreads earned on our assets, the moderate overall risk profile, and the strategic objective to have a positive correlation of earnings to short-term interest rates.

43

Table of Contents
Components of Net Interest Income
We generate net interest income from the following two components:

Net interest rate spread. This component equals the balance of total earning assets multiplied by the difference between the book yield on interest-earning assets and the book cost of interest-bearing liabilities. It is composed of net (amortization)/accretion, prepayment fees on Advances, and all other earnings from interest-earning assets net of funding costs. The latter is the largest component and represents the coupon yields of interest-earning assets net of the coupon costs of interest-bearing liabilities.
Earnings from funding assets with capital (“earnings from capital”). Because of our relatively low net interest rate spread compared to other financial institutions, we have historically derived a substantial portion of net interest income from deploying interest-free capital in interest-earning assets. We deploy much of the capital in short-term and adjustable-rate assets in order to help ensure that ROE moves in the same direction as short-term interest rates and to help control market risk exposure.

This component equals the balance of total earning assets multiplied by the difference between the book yield on interest-earning assets and the book cost of interest-bearing liabilities. It is composed of net (amortization)/accretion, prepayment fees on Advances, and all other earnings from interest-earning assets net of funding costs. The latter is the largest component and represents the coupon yields of interest-earning assets net of the coupon costs of interest-bearing liabilities.
Earnings from funding assets with capital (“earnings from capital”). Because of our relatively low net interest rate spread compared to other financial institutions, we have historically derived a substantial portion of net interest income from deploying interest-free capital in interest-earning assets. We deploy much of the capital in short-term and adjustable-rate assets in order to help ensure that ROE moves in the same direction as short-term interest rates and to help control market risk exposure.

The following table shows selected components of net interest income. Reasons for the variance in net interest income between the periods are discussed below.

(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017(Dollars in millions)202020192018
Amount % of Earning Assets Amount % of Earning Assets Amount % of Earning Assets Amount% of Earning AssetsAmount% of Earning AssetsAmount% of Earning Assets
Components of net interest rate spread:           Components of net interest rate spread:
Net (amortization)/accretion (1) (2)
$(37) (0.04)% $(17) (0.02)% $(20) (0.02)%
Net (amortization)/accretion (1) (2)
$(115)(0.13)%$(37)(0.04)%$(17)(0.02)%
Prepayment fees on Advances, net (2)
8
 0.01
 1
 
 1
 
Prepayment fees on Advances, net (2)
34 0.04 0.01 — 
Other components of net interest rate spread317
 0.33
 407
 0.39
 382
 0.38
Other components of net interest rate spread441 0.50 317 0.33 407 0.39 
Total net interest rate spread288
 0.30
 391
 0.37
 363
 0.36
Total net interest rate spread360 0.41 288 0.30 391 0.37 
Earnings from funding assets with interest-free capital118
 0.12
 108
 0.10
 66
 0.06
Earnings from funding assets with interest-free capital46 0.05 118 0.12 108 0.10 
Total net interest income/net interest margin (3)
$406
 0.42 % $499
 0.47 % $429
 0.42 %
Total net interest income/net interest margin (3)
$406 0.46 %$406 0.42 %$499 0.47 %
(1)Includes monthly recognition of premiums and discounts paid on purchases of mortgage assets, premiums, discounts and concessions paid on Consolidated Obligations and other hedging basis adjustments.
(2)This component of net interest rate spread has been segregated to display its relative impact.
(3)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets.
(1)Includes monthly recognition of premiums and discounts paid on purchases of mortgage assets, premiums, discounts and concessions paid on Consolidated Obligations and other hedging basis adjustments.
(2)This component of net interest rate spread has been segregated to display its relative impact.
(3)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets.

Net Amortization/Accretion (generally referred to as "amortization"): While net amortization has been moderate over the past few years, it can become substantial and volatile whenvolatile. When mortgage rates decrease.decrease, premium amortization of mortgage assets generally increases, which reduces net interest income. Amortization in 2020 increased in 2019significantly compared to 20182019 primarily due to thea decline in mortgage rates, during the first three quarters of 2019, which led to accelerated prepayments of mortgage assets.assets in 2020.

Prepayment Fees on Advances: Fees for members' early repayment of certain Advances, which are included in net interest income, are designed to make us economically indifferent to whether members hold Advances to maturity or repay them before maturity. Although Advance prepayment fees can be significant,have been minimal in recent years, they were minimal throughout most of 2019 and all of 2018, reflecting a low amount of member prepayments of Advances. However, at the end of 2019, one member prepaid its Advances, which was the primary driver of the $8 milliongrew in 2020. The growth in Advance prepayment fees was due to the decline in 2019.interest rates and the U.S. government's actions to provide liquidity to support the economy.


Other Components of Net Interest Rate Spread: The total other components of net interest rate spread decreased $90increased $124 million in 20192020 compared to 2018.2019. The net decrease wasincreases were primarily due to the factors below.

20192020 Versus 20182019
Higher spreads on shorter-term and floating-rate asset balances-Favorable: Higher spreads on shorter-term and floating-rate assets improved net interest income by an estimated $175 million as the rates on the debt funding these assets declined. However, the increase in net interest income was substantially offset by lower non-interest income (loss) primarily due to an increase of $103 million in the net interest settlements being paid on related derivatives not receiving hedge accounting.
44

Lower spreads earned on MPP-Unfavorable: Lower spreads on mortgage assets decreased net interest income by an estimated $17 million. The lower spreads were driven by the decline in long-term interest rates, which accelerated the prepayments of higher-yielding mortgages.
Lower average balances of mortgage-backed securities-Unfavorable: The $3.2 billion decrease in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities lowered net interest income by an estimated $13 million.
Lower average Advance balances-Unfavorable: The $4.6 billion decrease in the average balance of Advances lowered net interest income by an estimated $10 million.
Unrealized losses on designated fair value hedges-Unfavorable: Net unrealized losses on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying fair value hedge relationships lowered net interest income by $10 million.

-Unfavorable: Lower spreads earned on certain Advances decreased net interest income by an estimated $54 million. The lower spreads were a result of a shift in composition of Advance balances to overnight and shorter-term Advances. However, the decrease in net interest income was partially offset by a decrease of $22 million in net interest payments on related derivatives not receiving hedge accounting, which was a benefit reflected in non-interest income (loss).
Lower average Advance balances-Unfavorable: The $17.5 billion decline in average Advance balances decreased net interest income by an estimated $37 million. The decline in average Advance balances was primarily due to the reduction in borrowings by a few large-asset members.
Lower spreads on mortgage assets balances-Unfavorable: Lower spreads on mortgage assets decreased net interest income by an estimated $10 million due to the falling interest rate environment.
Growth in average MPP balances-Favorable: The $0.8 billion increase in the average balance of mortgage loans held for portfolio improved net interest income by an estimated $9 million.
Growth in average liquidity investment balances-Favorable: The $8.7 billion increase in the average balance of non-mortgage investments improved net interest income by an estimated $8 million.
Gains (losses) on designated fair value hedges-Unfavorable: Net unrealized losses on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying fair value hedge relationships lowered net interest income by $6 million. Prior to 2019, unrealized gains (losses) on fair value hedge relationships were included in “Non-interest income (loss).” See below for further discussion of the adoption of new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019.

Earnings from Capital: Earnings from capital increased $10decreased $72 million in 20192020 compared to 20182019 primarily due to average overnightshort-term rates being approximately 0.35 percentagedeclining more than 170 basis points higher in 2019 compared to 2018. The higher earnings from capital was a benefit experienced in the first half of 2019 that began to dissipate in the second half of the year due to the actions taken byas the Federal Reserve responded to decrease short-term interest rates and the lower average capital balances.evolving risks to economic activity from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Average Balance Sheet and Rates
The following table providestables provide average balances and rates for major balance sheet accounts, which determine the changes in net interest rate spreads. Interest amounts and average rates are affected by our use of derivatives and the related accounting elections we make. In connection with the January 1, 2019, prospective adoption of the FASB's Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities standard, interest amounts reported for Advances, MBS, Other investments and Swapped Bonds include gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying fair value hedge relationships for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.


45

Table of Contents
In addition, the net interest settlements of interest receivables or payables associated with derivatives in a fair value hedge relationship are included in net interest income and interest rate spread. However, if the derivatives do not qualify for fair value hedge accounting, the related net interest settlements of interest receivables or payables are recorded in “Non-interest income (loss)” as Net“Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activitiesactivities” and therefore are excluded from the calculation of net interest rate spread. Amortization associated with some hedging-related basis adjustments is also reflected in net interest income, which affects interest rate spread.
(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017
 Average Balance Interest 
Average Rate (1)
 Average Balance Interest 
Average Rate (1)
 Average Balance Interest 
Average Rate (1)
Assets                 
Advances$47,968
 $1,204
 2.51% $65,491
 $1,409
 2.15% $67,656
 $905
 1.34%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (2)
10,739
 340
 3.17
 9,967
 321
 3.22
 9,447
 297
 3.14
Federal funds sold and securities
   purchased under resale agreements
13,142
 293
 2.23
 12,122
 228
 1.88
 9,184
 94
 1.02
Interest-bearing deposits in banks (3) (4) (5)
1,701
 38
 2.25
 1,843
 41
 2.22
 624
 6
 1.03
MBS15,029
 386
 2.57
 15,741
 380
 2.41
 14,710
 306
 2.08
Other investments (4)
7,914
 184
 2.33
 88
 2
 2.69
 33
 
 0.83
Loans to other FHLBanks3
 
 2.43
 1
 
 1.46
 
 
 
Total interest-earning assets96,496
 2,445
 2.54
 105,253
 2,381
 2.26
 101,654
 1,608
 1.58
Less: allowance for credit losses
   on mortgage loans
1
     1
     1
    
Other assets442
     288
     264
    
Total assets$96,937
     $105,540
     $101,917
    
Liabilities and Capital                 
Term deposits$49
 1
 2.41
 $77
 1
 1.78
 $76
 1
 0.72
Other interest-bearing deposits (5)
768
 15
 1.91
 747
 13
 1.69
 621
 4
 0.68
Discount Notes44,482
 989
 2.22
 49,185
 915
 1.86
 43,124
 385
 0.89
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds24,467
 558
 2.28
 26,618
 554
 2.08
 26,768
 527
 1.97
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds16,131
 371
 2.30
 16,967
 317
 1.87
 18,500
 185
 1.00
Swapped Bonds5,311
 104
 1.96
 5,917
 80
 1.36
 7,099
 75
 1.05
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock25
 1
 4.50
 30
 2
 6.00
 46
 2
 5.42
Other borrowings
 
 2.14
 
 
 1.81
 1
 
 1.17
Total interest-bearing liabilities91,233
 2,039
 2.24
 99,541
 1,882
 1.89
 96,235
 1,179
 1.22
Non-interest bearing deposits9
     4
     2
    
Other liabilities811
     599
     582
    
Total capital4,884
     5,396
     5,098
    
Total liabilities and capital$96,937
     $105,540
     $101,917
    
Net interest rate spread    0.30%     0.37%     0.36%
Net interest income and
   net interest margin (6)
  $406
 0.42%   $499
 0.47%   $429
 0.42%
Average interest-earning assets to
   interest-bearing liabilities
    105.77%     105.74%     105.63%
(Dollars in millions)202020192018
 Average BalanceInterest
Average Rate (1)
Average BalanceInterest
Average Rate (1)
Average Balance Interest 
Average Rate (1)
Assets:      
Advances$43,323 $469 1.08 %$47,968 $1,204 2.51 %$65,491 $1,409 2.15 %
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (2)
11,264 276 2.45 10,739 340 3.17 9,967 321 3.22 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements7,784 43 0.55 13,142 293 2.23 12,122 228 1.88 
Interest-bearing deposits in banks (3) (4) (5)
1,390 0.55 1,701 38 2.25 1,843 41 2.22 
MBS (4)
11,864 186 1.57 15,029 386 2.57 15,741 380 2.41 
Other investments (4)
11,832 265 2.24 7,914 184 2.33 88 2.69 
Loans to other FHLBanks— 1.22 — 2.43 — 1.46 
Total interest-earning assets87,462 1,247 1.43 96,496 2,445 2.54 105,253 2,381 2.26 
Less: allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans—    
Other assets1,248 442  288   
Total assets$88,710 $96,937   $105,540   
Liabilities and Capital:      
Term deposits$78 — 0.67 $49 2.41 $77 1.78 
Other interest-bearing deposits (5)
1,208 0.25 768 15 1.91 747 13 1.69 
Discount Notes43,284 295 0.68 44,482 989 2.22 49,185 915 1.86 
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds21,319 432 2.03 24,467 558 2.28 26,618 554 2.08 
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds13,394 53 0.40 16,131 371 2.30 16,967 317 1.87 
Swapped Bonds3,584 57 1.58 5,311 104 1.96 5,917 80 1.36 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock55 1.93 25 4.50 30 6.00 
Other borrowings— — — — 2.14 — — 1.81 
Total interest-bearing liabilities82,923 841 1.02 91,233 2,039 2.24 99,541 1,882 1.89 
Non-interest bearing deposits    
Other liabilities1,006 811   599   
Total capital4,779 4,884   5,396   
Total liabilities and capital$88,710 $96,937   $105,540   
Net interest rate spread0.41 % 0.30 %  0.37 %
Net interest income and net interest margin (6)
$406 0.46 % $406 0.42 % $499 0.47 %
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities105.48 %  105.77 %  105.74 %
(1)Amounts used to calculate average rates are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
(2)Non-accrual loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.
(3)Includes certificates of deposit that are classified as available-for-sale securities.
(4)Includes available-for-sale securities based on their amortized costs. The yield information does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity for available-for-sale securities.
(5)The average balance amounts include the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.
(6)Net interest margin is net interest income before provision for credit losses as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets.
(1)Amounts used to calculate average rates are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
(2)Non-accrual loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.
(3)Includes certificates of deposit that are classified as available-for-sale securities.
(4)Includes available-for-sale securities based on their amortized costs. The yield information does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity for available-for-sale securities.
(5)The average balance amounts include the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.
(6)Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets.
Rates on all of our short-term and adjustable-rateinterest-bearing assets and liabilities increaseddecreased in 20192020 compared to 20182019 due to the increasesdecline in interest rates. Average rates on short-term LIBORassets and the Federal funds target rate in the second halfliabilities declined more notably as they repriced quicker to lower rates.

46

Table of 2018 that persisted throughout the first two quarters of 2019. The decrease in net interest margin in 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily driven by lower spreads earned on certain Advances.Contents


Volume/Rate Analysis
Changes in both average balances (volume) and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, as shown in the following table.
(In millions)2020 over 20192019 over 2018
 
Volume (1)(3)
Rate (2)(3)
Total
Volume (1)(3)
Rate (2)(3)
Total
Increase (decrease) in interest income   
Advances$(107)$(628)$(735)$(416)$211 $(205)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio16 (80)(64)25 (6)19 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements(88)(162)(250)20 45 65 
Interest-bearing deposits in banks(6)(24)(30)(3)— (3)
MBS(70)(130)(200)(18)24 
Other investments88 (7)81 182 — 182 
Loans to other FHLBanks— — — — — — 
Total(167)(1,031)(1,198)(210)274 64 
Increase (decrease) in interest expense    
Term deposits— (1)(1)(1)— 
Other interest-bearing deposits(17)(12)— 
Discount Notes(26)(668)(694)(93)167 74 
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds(67)(59)(126)(47)51 
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds(54)(264)(318)(16)70 54 
Swapped Bonds(29)(18)(47)(9)33 24 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock(1)— — (1)(1)
Other borrowings— — — — — — 
Total(170)(1,028)(1,198)(166)323 157 
Increase (decrease) in net interest income$$(3)$— $(44)$(49)$(93)
(1)Volume changes are calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the prior year rate.
(2)Rate changes are calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the prior year average balance.
(3)Changes that are not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related, but rather are equally attributable to both volume and rate changes, have been allocated to the volume and rate categories based upon the proportion of the absolute value of the volume and rate changes.

47

(In millions)2019 over 2018 2018 over 2017
 
Volume (1)(3)
 
Rate (2)(3)
 Total 
Volume (1)(3)
 
Rate (2)(3)
 Total
Increase (decrease) in interest income           
Advances$(416) $211
 $(205) $(30) $534
 $504
Mortgage loans held for portfolio25
 (6) 19
 16
 8
 24
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements20
 45
 65
 37
 97
 134
Interest-bearing deposits in banks(3) 
 (3) 22
 13
 35
MBS(18) 24
 6
 23
 51
 74
Other investments182
 
 182
 1
 1
 2
Loans to other FHLBanks
 
 
 
 
 
Total(210) 274
 64
 69
 704
 773
Increase (decrease) in interest expense           
Term deposits(1) 1
 
 
 
 
Other interest-bearing deposits
 2
 2
 1
 8
 9
Discount Notes(93) 167
 74
 61
 469
 530
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds(47) 51
 4
 (3) 30
 27
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds(16) 70
 54
 (17) 149
 132
Swapped Bonds(9) 33
 24
 (14) 19
 5
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock
 (1) (1) 
 
 
Other borrowings
 
 
 
 
 
Total(166) 323
 157
 28
 675
 703
Increase (decrease) in net interest income$(44) $(49) $(93) $41
 $29
 $70
Table of Contents
(1)Volume changes are calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the prior year rate.
(2)Rate changes are calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the prior year average balance.
(3)Changes that are not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related, but rather are equally attributable to both volume and rate changes, have been allocated to the volume and rate categories based upon the proportion of the absolute value of the volume and rate changes.




Effect of the Use of Derivatives on Net Interest Income
The following table shows the impact on net interest income from the effect of derivatives and hedging activities. As noted above, for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying fair value hedge relationships are recorded in interest income or expense as a result of the January 1, 2019 prospective adoption of new hedge accounting guidance. In addition, for derivatives designated as a fair value hedge, the net interest settlements of interest receivables or payables related to such derivatives are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or expense of the designated hedged item. As such, beginning in 2019, all the effects on earnings of derivatives qualifying for fair value hedge accounting are reflected in net interest income. The effect on earnings from derivatives not receiving fair value hedge accounting is providedare reflected in non-interest income (loss). The following table shows the “Non-Interest Income (Loss)” section below.impact on net interest income from the effect of derivatives and hedging activities.

(In millions)(In millions)202020192018
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Advances:     Advances:
Amortization of hedging activities in net interest income$(1) $(1) $(2)Amortization of hedging activities in net interest income$(1)$(1)$(1)
Gains (losses) on designated fair value hedges(6) N/A
 N/A
Gains (losses) on designated fair value hedges(16)(6)N/A
Net interest settlements included in net interest income36
 24
 (18)Net interest settlements included in net interest income(91)36 24 
Investment securities:Investment securities:
Net interest settlements included in net interest incomeNet interest settlements included in net interest income(2)— 
Mortgage loans:     Mortgage loans:
Amortization of derivative fair value adjustments in net interest income(3) (1) (3)Amortization of derivative fair value adjustments in net interest income(12)(3)(1)
Consolidated Obligation Bonds:     Consolidated Obligation Bonds:
Net interest settlements included in net interest income2
 (3) (1)Net interest settlements included in net interest income(3)
Increase (decrease) to net interest income$28
 $19
 $(24)Increase (decrease) to net interest income$(120)$28 $19 

Most of our use of derivatives is to synthetically convert the fixed interest rates on certain Advances, investments and Consolidated Obligations to adjustable rates tied to an eligible benchmark rate (e.g., LIBOR, the Federal funds effective rate, or SOFR). The larger positivenegative net effect of derivatives on net interest income in 20192020 was primarily due to higherlower short-term benchmark interest rates in the first half of 20192020 compared to the same period of 2018,2019, which resulted in an increase in net interest settlements being paid, rather than received, on certain Advances where the fixed interest rates were converted to adjustable-coupon rates. As short-term rates began to decrease in the second half of 2019, the positive net effect of derivatives on net interest income was muted as the net interest settlements received on certain Advances declined in the last quarter of 2019. The fluctuation in earnings from the use of derivatives was acceptable because it enabled us to lower market risk exposure by matching actual cash flows between assets and liabilities more closely than would otherwise occur.
48

Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income (Loss)

Non-interest income (loss) consists of certain realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, derivatives activities, financial instruments held under the fair value option, and other non-interest earning activities. The following tables present the net effect of derivatives and hedging activities on non-interest income (loss). In connection with the January 1, 2019 prospective adoption of new hedge accounting guidance, gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in a qualifying fair value hedge relationship are no longer recorded in non-interest income (loss) for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. As such, beginning in 2019, the effects of derivatives and hedging activities on non-interest income relate only to derivatives not qualifying for fair value hedge accounting.


2020
(In millions)AdvancesInvestment SecuritiesMortgage LoansBondsDiscount Notes
Balance Sheet (1)
OtherTotal
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting$— $(242)$(10)$14 $— $91 $— $(147)
Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting— (172)— 23 22 — — (127)
Price alignment amount— — — — — — 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities— (414)(10)37 22 91 (273)
Gains (losses) on trading securities (2)
— 257 — — — — — 257 
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)
— — (9)— — (7)
Total net effect on non-interest income$$(157)$(10)$28 $23 $91 $$(23)

2019
(In millions)AdvancesInvestment SecuritiesMortgage LoansBondsDiscount Notes
Balance Sheet (1)
OtherTotal
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting$(2)$(194)$$54 $— $(19)$— $(157)
Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting— — (26)— — — (24)
Price alignment amount— — — — — — 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities— (194)28 — (19)(178)
Gains (losses) on trading securities (2)
— 210 — — — — — 210 
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)
— — — (53)(1)— — (54)
Total net effect on non-interest income$— $16 $$(25)$(1)$(19)$$(22)
 2019
(In millions)Advances Investment Securities Mortgage Loans Bonds Discount Notes 
Balance Sheet (1)
 Other Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities               
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting$(2) $(194) $4
 $54
 $
 $(19) $
 $(157)
Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting2
 
 
 (26) 
 
 
 (24)
Price alignment amount
 
 
 
 
 
 3
 3
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities
 (194) 4
 28
 
 (19) 3
 (178)
Gains (losses) on trading securities (2)

 210
 
 
 
 
 
 210
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)

 
 
 (53) (1) 
 
 (54)
Total net effect on non-interest income$
 $16
 $4
 $(25) $(1) $(19) $3
 $(22)
49

Table of Contents
20182018
(In millions)Advances Investment Securities Mortgage Loans Bonds 
Balance Sheet (1)
 Total(In millions)AdvancesInvestment SecuritiesMortgage LoansBonds
Balance Sheet (1)
Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities           Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Gains (losses) on fair value hedges$2
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2
Gains (losses) on fair value hedges$$— $— $— $— $
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting1
 (9) (1) 18
 (6) 3
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting(9)(1)18 (6)
Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting
 
 
 (46) 
 (46)Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting— — — (46)— (46)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities3
 (9) (1) (28) (6) (41)Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(9)(1)(28)(6)(41)
Gains (losses) on trading securities (2)

 7
 
 
 
 7
Gains (losses) on trading securities (2)
— — — — 
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)

 
 
 (14) 
 (14)
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)
— — — (14)— (14)
Total net effect on non-interest income$3
 $(2) $(1) $(42) $(6) $(48)Total net effect on non-interest income$$(2)$(1)$(42)$(6)$(48)
 2017
(In millions)Advances Mortgage Loans Bonds 
Balance Sheet (1)
 Other Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities           
Gains (losses) on fair value hedges$(1) $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting2
 4
 (6) (17) 
 (17)
Net interest settlements on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting(1) 
 (7) 
 
 (8)
Price alignment amount
 
 
 
 1
 1
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities
 4
 (12) (17) 1
 (24)
Gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option (3)

 
 10
 
 
 10
Total net effect on non-interest income$
 $4
 $(2) $(17) $1
 $(14)
(1)Balance sheet includes synthetic basis swaps and swaptions, which are not designated as hedging a specific financial instrument.
(1)Balance sheet includes swaptions, which are not designated as hedging a specific financial instrument.
(2)Includes only those gains (losses) on trading securities that have an assigned economic derivative; therefore, this line item may not agree to the Statement of Income.
(3)Includes only those gains or losses on financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative "assigned."
(2)Includes only those gains (losses) on trading securities that have an assigned economic derivative; therefore, this line item may not agree to the Statement of Income.
(3)Includes only those gains or losses on financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative "assigned."

The net amount of income volatility in derivatives and hedging activities was moderate and consistent with the close hedging relationships of our derivative transactions. Most of the volatility was a result of both unrealized fair value gains and losses on instruments we expect to hold to maturity and the costssale of utilizinginterest rate swaptions as interest rates fell to historically low levels during the first quarter of 2020. We use swaptions to hedge market risk exposure associated with

fixed-rate mortgage assets. Weassets and may sell swaptions as interest rates change in order to offset actual and anticipated risks associated with holding fixed-rate mortgage assets.

In 2019, we began purchasing U.S. Treasury obligations to help meet the new regulatory liquidity requirements. At December 31, 2019,2020, we held over $9.6$10.5 billion of fixed ratefixed-rate U.S. Treasury and GSE obligations and swapped them to a variable rate. These investments are classified as trading securities and are recorded at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in non-interest income (loss). There are a number of factors that affect the fair value of these securities, including changes in interest rates, the passage of time, and volatility. By hedging these trading securities, the gains or losses on these trading securities will generally be offset by the changes in fair value ofgains or losses on the associated interest rate swaps.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents non-interest expense and related financial ratios for each of the last three years.

(Dollars in millions)2020 20192018
Non-interest expense  
Compensation and benefits$50 $46 $46 
Other operating expense21 22 20 
Finance Agency
Office of Finance
Other
Total non-interest expense$92 $89 $85 

Our business is designed to support significant changes in asset levels without having to undergo material changes in staffing, operations, risk practices, or general resource needs. Accordingly, total non-interest expenses have remained stable with only minimal increases over the past several years.

50

(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017
Non-interest expense     
Compensation and benefits$46
 $46
 $42
Other operating expense22
 20
 19
Finance Agency7
 7
 7
Office of Finance5
 5
 4
Other9
 7
 7
Total non-interest expense$89
 $85
 $79
Average total assets$96,937
 $105,540
 $101,917
Average regulatory capital4,921
 5,442
 5,157
Total non-interest expense to average total assets (1)
0.09% 0.08% 0.08%
Total non-interest expense to average regulatory capital (1)
1.80
 1.56
 1.53

(1)Amounts used to calculate percentages are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
Total non-interest expense remained relatively stable in 2019 compared to 2018. The ratioTable of non-interest expense to average regulatory capital increased in 2019 compared to 2018 due to the lower average capital balance, which resulted from the repurchases of excess stock throughout the year.Contents

Analysis of Quarterly ROE

The following table summarizes the components of 2019's2020's quarterly ROE and provides quarterly ROE for 20182019 and 2017.2018.
 
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Total
Components of 2020 ROE:     
Net interest income:     
Other net interest income8.69 %11.74 %9.68 %10.33 %10.19 %
Net amortization(1.91)(1.98)(2.67)(3.22)(2.40)
Prepayment fees0.37 0.95 0.62 0.94 0.72 
Total net interest income7.15 10.71 7.63 8.05 8.51 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(25.60)(2.43)1.61 3.45 (5.72)
Other non-interest income (loss)28.27 1.36 (2.23)(4.95)5.57 
Total non-interest income (loss)2.67 (1.07)(0.62)(1.50)(0.15)
Total income9.82 9.64 7.01 6.55 8.36 
Total non-interest expense2.11 1.72 1.79 2.18 1.93 
Affordable Housing Program assessments0.77 0.80 0.52 0.44 0.65 
2020 ROE6.94 %7.12 %4.70 %3.93 %5.78 %
2019 ROE5.59 %5.09 %5.36 %6.64 %5.65 %
2018 ROE6.23 %6.15 %6.87 %5.90 %6.29 %
 
1st  Quarter
2nd  Quarter
3rd  Quarter
4th  Quarter
Total
Components of 2019 ROE:     
Net interest income:     
Other net interest income9.59 %8.32 %8.39 %9.21 %8.89 %
Net amortization(0.27)(0.61)(0.99)(1.21)(0.75)
Prepayment fees
0.01
0.06
0.66
0.17
Total net interest income9.32
7.72
7.46
8.66
8.31
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and
   hedging activities
(1.98)(12.06)(5.15)5.29
(3.64)
Other non-interest income (loss)0.58
11.85
5.52
(4.72)3.43
Total non-interest income (loss)(1.40)(0.21)0.37
0.57
(0.21)
Total income7.92
7.51
7.83
9.23
8.10
Total non-interest expense1.71
1.85
1.87
1.85
1.82
Affordable Housing Program assessments0.62
0.57
0.60
0.74
0.63
2019 ROE5.59 %5.09 %5.36 %6.64 %5.65 %
      
2018 ROE6.23 %6.15 %6.87 %5.90 %6.29 %
      
2017 ROE5.25 %6.94 %5.97 %6.42 %6.15 %

The volatility in quarterly ROE during 2019 and 20182020 was primarily driven by unrealized gainsthe impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and losses related to the net effect of derivatives and hedging activities.low interest rate environment. For example, ROE in the fourthfirst two quarters of 2020 was elevated given the sale of interest rate swaptions during the first quarter of 2019 was elevated2020 and given the increase in Advance activity at the end of the first quarter as comparedthe financial markets reacted to the first threeCOVID-19 pandemic, and members turned to us for liquidity. However, ROE decreased significantly in the last two quarters of 20192020 as a result of the higher volume of mortgage refinance activity, which led to elevated levels of mortgage loan repayments and mostrelated premium amortization. Additionally, the historically low short-term interest rates throughout 2020 lowered the earnings generated from investing our capital.

51

Table of 2018 primarily due to increases in the fair values of certain derivatives and other financial instruments carried at fair value and recognition of prepayment fees.Contents

Segment Information

Note 1814 of the Notes to Financial Statements presents information on our two operating business segments. We manage financial operations and market risk exposure primarily at the macro level, and within the context of the entire balance sheet, rather than exclusively at the level of individual segments. Under this approach, the market risk/return profile of each segment may not match, or possibly even have the same trends as, what would occur if we managed each segment on a stand-alone basis. The tables below summarize each segment's operating results for the periods shown.
(Dollars in millions)Traditional Member Finance MPP Total
2019     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses$309
 $97
 $406
Net income$206
 $70
 $276
Average assets$83,867
 $13,070
 $96,937
Assumed average capital allocation$4,226
 $658
 $4,884
Return on average assets (1)
0.25% 0.54% 0.28%
Return on average equity (1)
4.87% 10.71% 5.65%
      
2018     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses$390
 $109
 $499
Net income$255
 $84
 $339
Average assets$93,531
 $12,009
 $105,540
Assumed average capital allocation$4,781
 $615
 $5,396
Return on average assets (1)
0.27% 0.70% 0.32%
Return on average equity (1)
5.34% 13.65% 6.29%
      
2017     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses$335
 $94
 $429
Net income$243
 $71
 $314
Average assets$91,485
 $10,432
 $101,917
Assumed average capital allocation$4,576
 $522
 $5,098
Return on average assets (1)
0.27% 0.68% 0.31%
Return on average equity (1)
5.30% 13.60% 6.15%
(1)Amounts used to calculate returns are based on numbers in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
(Dollars in millions)Traditional Member Finance MPP Total
2020     
Net interest income$385  $21  $406 
Net income$221  $55  $276 
Average assets$77,090  $11,620  $88,710 
Assumed average capital allocation$4,149  $630  $4,779 
Return on average assets (1)
0.29 % 0.48 % 0.31 %
Return on average equity (1)
5.33 % 8.76 % 5.78 %
      
2019     
Net interest income$309  $97  $406 
Net income$206 $70 $276 
Average assets$83,867  $13,070  $96,937 
Assumed average capital allocation$4,226  $658  $4,884 
Return on average assets (1)
0.25 % 0.54 % 0.28 %
Return on average equity (1)
4.87 % 10.71 % 5.65 %
2018
Net interest income$390  $109  $499 
Net income$255 $84 $339 
Average assets$93,531  $12,009  $105,540 
Assumed average capital allocation$4,781  $615  $5,396 
Return on average assets (1)
0.27 % 0.70 % 0.32 %
Return on average equity (1)
5.34 % 13.65 % 6.29 %
(1)Amounts used to calculate returns are based on numbers in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.

Traditional Member Finance Segment
2019 Versus 2018:Net interest income decreasedincreased in 20192020 compared to 20182019 primarily due to lowerhigher spreads earned on certain Advances and lower average Advance balances. The decreaseliquidity investments as well as an increase in net income in 2019 compared to 2018 wasprepayment fees on Advances. However, these favorable factors were partially offset by increaseslower earnings from funding assets with interest-free capital and the decline in average MBS balances. Much of the fair value on certain derivatives and other financial instruments carried at fair value and lowerbenefits to net interest paymentsincome were offset by an increase in net interest settlements paid on certain derivatives.derivatives not receiving hedge accounting, which are recorded in non-interest income (loss).


MPP Segment
Compared to the Traditional Member Finance segment, the MPP segment can exhibit more earnings volatility relative to short-term interest rates and more credit risk exposure. However, the MPP segment also provides the opportunity to enhance risk-adjusted returns, which normally augments earnings. Although mortgage assets are the largest source of our market risk, we believe that we have historically managed this risk prudently and consistently with our risk appetite and corporate objectives. We also believe that these assets do not excessively elevate the balance sheet's overall market risk exposure.

52

Table of Contents
2019 Versus 2018:
The MPP continued to earn a substantial level of profitability compared to market interest rates, with a moderate amount of market risk and a minimal amount of credit risk. In 2019, the MPP averaged 13 percent of total average assets while accounting for 26 percent of earnings.
Net income decreased in 20192020 compared to 20182019 due to higher net amortization as a result of accelerated prepayments,and lower spreads earned on MPP assets due to fallingdriven by the low interest rates andrate environment. We expect the trend of higher net losses on derivatives and hedging activities.amortization to continue in the near future unless mortgage rates rise. The decrease in MPP's net income wasnegative factors were partially offset in 2020 by the growthsale of interest rate swaptions as rates fell to historically low levels in average MPP balances.the first quarter of 2020.



QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

We face various risks that could affect the ability to achieve our mission and corporate objectives. We generally categorize risks as: 1) business/strategic risk, 2) regulatory/legal risk, 3) market risk (also referred to as interest rate or prepayment risk), 4) credit risk, 5) funding/liquidity risk, and 6) operational risk. Our Board of Directors establishes objectives regarding risk philosophy, risk appetite, risk tolerances, and financial performance expectations. Market, capital adequacy, credit, liquidity, concentration, and operational risks are discussed below. Other risks are discussed throughout this report.

We strive to maintain a risk profile that ensures we operate safely and soundly, promotes prudent growth in Mission Asset Activity, consistently generates competitive earnings, and protects the par value of members' capital stock investment. We believe our business is financially sound and adequately capitalized on a risk-adjusted basis.

We practice this conservative risk philosophy in many ways:

We operate with moderate market risk and limited residual credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and capital impairment risk.
We operate with moderate market risk and limited residual credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and capital impairment risk.

We have a business objective to ensure competitive and relatively stable profitability.
We have a business objective to ensure competitive and relatively stable profitability.

We make conservative investment choices in terms of the types of investments we purchase and counterparties with which we engage.
We make conservative investment choices in terms of the types of investments we purchase and counterparties with which we engage.

We use derivatives to hedge assets and liabilities and to help reduce market risk exposure.
We use derivatives to hedge assets and liabilities and to help reduce market risk exposure.

We maintain a prudent amount of financial leverage.
We maintain a prudent amount of financial leverage.

We are judicious in instituting regular, district-wide repurchases of excess stock.
We are judicious in instituting regular, district-wide repurchases of excess stock.

We hold an amount of retained earnings that we believe will protect the par value of capital stock and provide for dividend stabilization.
We hold an amount of retained earnings that we believe will protect the par value of capital stock and provide for dividend stabilization.

We create a working and operating environment that emphasizes a stable employee base.
We create a working and operating environment that emphasizes a stable employee base.

We have numerous Board-adopted policies and processes that address risk management including risk appetite, tolerances, limits, guidelines, and regulatory compliance. Our cooperative business model, corporate objectives, capital structure, and regulatory oversight provide us clear incentives to minimize risk exposures. Our policies and operating practices are designed to limit risk exposures from ongoing operations in the following broad ways:

by anticipating potential business risks and developing appropriate responses;

by defining permissible lines of business;

by limiting the kinds of assets we are permitted to hold in terms of their credit risk exposure and the kinds of hedging and financing arrangements we are permitted to use;

by limiting the amount of market risk to which we are permitted to be exposed;


by anticipating potential business risks and developing appropriate responses;
by specifying very conservative tolerances for credit risk posed by Advances;

by specifying capital adequacy minimums; and
by defining permissible lines of business;

by requiring strict adherence to internal controls and operating procedures, adequate insurance coverage, and comprehensive Human Resources policies, procedures, and strategies.
by limiting the kinds of assets we are permitted to hold in terms of their credit risk exposure and the kinds of hedging and financing arrangements we are permitted to use;

by limiting the amount of market risk to which we are permitted to be exposed;

by specifying very conservative tolerances for credit risk posed by Advances;

53

Table of Contents
by specifying capital adequacy minimums; and

by requiring strict adherence to internal controls and operating procedures, adequate insurance coverage, and comprehensive Human Resources policies, procedures, and strategies.

Market Risk

Overview
Market risk exposure is the risk that profitability and the value of stockholders' capital investment may decrease and that profitability may become uncompetitive as a result of changes and volatility in the market environment and economy. Along with business/strategic risk, market risk is normally our largest residual risk.

Our risk appetite is to maintain market risk exposure in a low to moderate range while earning a competitive return on members' capital stock investment. There is normally a tradeoff between long-term market risk exposure and shorter-term exposure. Effective management of each component is important in order to attract and retain members and capital and to support Mission Asset Activity.

The primary challenges in managing market risk exposure arise from 1) the tradeoff between earning a competitive return and correlating profitability with short-term interest rates and 2) the market risk exposure of owning mortgage assets. Mortgage assets grant homeowners prepayment options that could adversely affect our financial performance when interest rates increase or decrease. We mitigate the market risk of mortgage assets primarily by funding them principally with a portfolio of long-term fixed-rate callable and non-callable Bonds. Secondarily, we use swaptions derivative transactions to a limited extent to mitigate the market risk of mortgage assets. The Bonds and swaptions provide expected cash flows that are similar to the cash flows expected from mortgage assets under a wide range of interest rate and prepayment environments. Because it is normally cost-prohibitive to completely mitigate mortgage prepayment risk, a residual amount of market risk remains after funding and hedging activities.

We analyze market risk using numerous analytical measures under a variety of interest rate and business scenarios, including stressed scenarios, and perform sensitivity analyses on the many variables that can affect market risk, using several market risk models from third-party software companies. These models employ rigorous valuation techniques for the optionality that exists in mortgage prepayments, call and put options, and caps/floors. We regularly assess the effects of different assumptions, techniques and methodologies on the measurements of market risk exposure, including comparisons to alternative models and information from brokers/dealers.

Policy Limits on Market Risk Exposure
We have six sets of policy limits regarding market risk exposure, which primarily measure long-term market risk exposure. We determine compliance with our policy limits at every month end or more frequently if market or business conditions change significantly or are volatile.

Market Value of Equity Sensitivity. The market value of equity for the entire balance sheet in two hypothetical interest rate scenarios (up 200 basis points and down 100 to 200 basis points from the current interest rate environment) must be between positive and negative 10 percent of the current balance sheet's market value of equity. The interest rate movements are “shocks,” defined as instantaneous, permanent, and parallel changes in interest rates in which every point on the yield curve is changed by the same amount. The size of the down shock varies with the level of long-term interest rates observed when measuring the risk.

Duration of Equity. The duration of equity for the entire balance sheet in the current (“base case”) interest rate environment must be between positive and negative five years and in the two interest rate shock scenarios (up 200 basis points and down 100 to 200 basis points from the current interest rate environment) must be between positive and negative six years.

Mortgage Assets Portfolio.The change in net market value of the mortgage assets portfolio as a percentage of the book value of portfolio assets must be between positive and negative three percent in each of the two interest rate shock scenarios. Net market value is defined as the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with no assumed capital allocation.


Market Value of Equity Sensitivity. The market value of equity for the entire balance sheet in two hypothetical interest rate scenarios (up 200 basis points and down 100 to 200 basis points from the current interest rate environment) must be between positive and negative 10 percent of the current balance sheet's market value of equity. The interest rate movements are “shocks,” defined as instantaneous, permanent, and parallel changes in interest rates in which every point on the yield curve is changed by the same amount. The size of the down shock varies with the level of long-term interest rates observed when measuring the risk.

Duration of Equity. The duration of equity for the entire balance sheet in the current (“base case”) interest rate environment must be between positive and negative five years and in the two interest rate shock scenarios (up 200 basis points and down 100 to 200 basis points from the current interest rate environment) must be between positive and negative six years.

Mortgage Assets Portfolio.The change in net market value of the mortgage assets portfolio as a percentage of the book value of portfolio assets must be between positive and negative three percent in each of the two interest rate shock scenarios. Net market value is defined as the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with no assumed capital allocation.

54

Market Capitalization. The market capitalization ratio (defined as the ratio of the market value of equity to the par value of regulatory stock) must be above 100 percent in the current rate environment and must be above 95 percent in each of the two interest rate shock scenarios.

Fixed Rate Mortgage Assets as a Multiple of Regulatory Capital. The amount of fixed mortgage assets must be less than five times the amount of regulatory capital.

MPP Assets as a Multiple of Regulatory Capital. The amount of MPP assets must be less than four times the amount of regulatory capital.

The market capitalization ratio (defined as the ratio of the market value of equity to the par value of regulatory stock) must be above 100 percent in the current rate environment and must be above 95 percent in each of the two interest rate shock scenarios.

Fixed Rate Mortgage Assets as a Multiple of Regulatory Capital. The amount of fixed mortgage assets must be less than six times the amount of regulatory capital.

MPP Assets as a Multiple of Regulatory Capital. The amount of MPP assets must be less than five times the amount of regulatory capital.

In addition, Finance Agency regulations and an internal policy provide controls on market risk exposure by restricting the types of mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and other investments we can hold. We also manage market risk exposure by charging members prepayment fees on many Advance programs where an early termination of an Advance would result in an economic loss to us.

In practice we carry a substantially smaller amount of market risk exposure by establishing a strategic management range that is well within policy limits.

Market Value of Equity and Duration of Equity - Entire Balance Sheet
Two key measures of long-term market risk exposure are the sensitivities of the market value of equity and the duration of equity to changes in interest rates and other variables, as presented in the following tables for various instantaneous and permanent interest rate shocks (in basis points). We compiled average results using data for each month end. Given the current level of rates, some down rate shocks are nonparallel scenarios, with short-term rates decreasing less than long-term rates such that no rate falls below zero.

Market Value of Equity
(Dollars in millions)Down 300 Down 200 Down 100 Flat Rates Up 100 Up 200 Up 300
Average Results             
2019 Full Year             
Market Value of Equity$4,545
 $4,580
 $4,652
 $4,729
 $4,674
 $4,586
 $4,528
% Change from Flat Case(3.9)% (3.1)% (1.6)% 
 (1.1)% (3.0)% (4.3)%
2018 Full Year             
Market Value of Equity$4,936
 $5,154
 $5,306
 $5,264
 $5,176
 $5,105
 $5,045
% Change from Flat Case(6.2)% (2.1)% 0.8 % 
 (1.7)% (3.0)% (4.2)%
Month-End Results             
December 31, 2019             
Market Value of Equity$4,257
 $4,262
 $4,236
 $4,372
 $4,313
 $4,213
 $4,144
% Change from Flat Case(2.6)% (2.5)% (3.1)% 
 (1.3)% (3.6)% (5.2)%
December 31, 2018             
Market Value of Equity$4,736
 $4,911
 $5,130
 $5,149
 $5,043
 $4,951
 $4,906
% Change from Flat Case(8.0)% (4.6)% (0.4)% 
 (2.1)% (3.8)% (4.7)%

(Dollars in millions)Down 300Down 200Down 100Flat RatesUp 100Up 200Up 300
Average Results       
2020 Full Year       
Market Value of Equity$4,541 $4,541 $4,547 $4,624 $4,723 $4,608 $4,466 
% Change from Flat Case(1.8)%(1.8)%(1.7)%— 2.1 %(0.3)%(3.4)%
2019 Full Year       
Market Value of Equity$4,545 $4,580 $4,652 $4,729 $4,674 $4,586 $4,528 
% Change from Flat Case(3.9)%(3.1)%(1.6)%— (1.1)%(3.0)%(4.3)%
Month-End Results
December 31, 2020
Market Value of Equity$3,765 $3,765 $3,791 $3,835 $3,893 $3,777 $3,676 
% Change from Flat Case(1.8)%(1.8)%(1.1)%— 1.5 %(1.5)%(4.2)%
December 31, 2019
Market Value of Equity$4,257 $4,262 $4,236 $4,372 $4,313 $4,213 $4,144 
% Change from Flat Case(2.6)%(2.5)%(3.1)%— (1.3)%(3.6)%(5.2)%
Duration of Equity
 
(In years)Down 300Down 200Down 100Flat RatesUp 100Up 200Up 300
Average Results       
2020 Full Year— — (0.9)(2.6)1.0 3.4 2.0 
2019 Full Year(0.8)(1.4)(1.7)(0.8)1.7 1.4 1.1 
Month-End Results       
December 31, 2020— (0.1)(1.4)(2.3)1.8 3.2 1.2 
December 31, 2019(0.1)0.6 (2.1)(1.2)2.0 1.7 1.4 
(In years)Down 300 Down 200 Down 100 Flat Rates Up 100 Up 200 Up 300
Average Results             
2019 Full Year(0.8) (1.4) (1.7) (0.8) 1.7
 1.4
 1.1
2018 Full Year(4.5) (4.7) (0.9) 1.7
 1.4
 1.2
 1.1
Month-End Results             
December 31, 2019(0.1) 0.6
 (2.1) (1.2) 2.0
 1.7
 1.4
December 31, 2018(3.8) (5.6) (2.5) 1.2
 2.0
 1.0
 0.6

The overall market risk exposure to changing interest rates was within policy limits during the periods presented. At December 31, 2019,2020, exposure to falling interest rates in the down 200 basis points and 300 basis pointsshock scenarios iswas muted as

some rates become floored at near zero rate levels. Exposure to moderate rising rate shocks decreased due to the reduction in all market rates that occurred during the first quarter of 2020. The duration of equity provides an estimate of the change in market value of equity for a 1.00 percentage point further change in interest rates from the rate shock level.
55

Table of Contents

Based on the totality of our risk analysis, we expect that profitability, defined as the level of ROE compared with short-term market rates, will remain competitive over the long term unless interest rates change by large amounts in a short period of time. Further declines in long-term interest rates could substantially decrease income in the near term (one to two years) before reverting over time to average levels. This temporary reduction in income would be driven by the acceleratedadditional recognition of mortgage asset premiums as the further incentive for borrowers to refinance results in faster than anticipated repayments of those mortgage assets. We believe that profitability would not become uncompetitive in a rising rate environment unless interest rates were to permanently increase in a short period of time by three percentage points or more and persist at the higher levels for a long period of time.

Market Risk Exposure of the Mortgage Assets Portfolio
The mortgage assets portfolio normally accounts for almost all market risk exposure because of prepayment volatility that we cannot completely hedge while maintaining sufficient net spreads. Sensitivities of the market value of equity allocated to the mortgage assets portfolio under interest rate shocks (in basis points) are shown below. The average mortgage assets portfolio had an assumed capital allocation of $1.3 billion in 20192020 based on the entire balance sheet's average regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. Average results shown in the table below are compiled using data for each month end. The market value sensitivities are one measure we use to analyze the portfolio's estimated market risk exposure.

% Change in Market Value of Equity-Mortgage Assets Portfolio
 Down 300Down 200Down 100Flat RatesUp 100Up 200Up 300
Average Results       
2020 Full Year(15.9)%(15.9)%(14.6)%— 11.9 %2.4 %(10.3)%
2019 Full Year(28.6)%(24.1)%(10.4)%— (2.4)%(8.3)%(11.7)%
Month-End Results       
December 31, 2020(15.3)%(15.3)%(11.3)%— 10.6 %3.9 %(1.7)%
December 31, 2019(17.7)%(17.2)%(12.5)%— (5.6)%(14.6)%(20.5)%
 Down 300 Down 200 Down 100 Flat Rates Up 100 Up 200 Up 300
Average Results             
2019 Full Year(28.6)% (24.1)% (10.4)%  (2.4)% (8.3)% (11.7)%
2018 Full Year(35.9)% (15.2)% 0.3 %  (4.3)% (7.4)% (10.0)%
Month-End Results             
December 31, 2019(17.7)% (17.2)% (12.5)%  (5.6)% (14.6)% (20.5)%
December 31, 2018(41.2)% (24.7)% (3.6)%  (7.0)% (13.2)% (15.9)%

The average risk exposure of the mortgage assets portfolio in 20192020 remained aligned with our preference to keep our exposure to market risk at a low to moderate level. The variances between periods shownprimarily reflect normal changes in the balance sheet composition and the impact of lower long-term interest rates observed in the second half of 2019.2020. These lower long-term interest rates resultresulted in reduced exposure to moderate rising rate shocks and muted exposure to falling rate shocks as they become floored when they reach near zero rate levels. We believe the mortgage asset portfolio will continue to provide an acceptable risk adjusted return consistent with our risk appetite philosophy.


56

Table of Contents
Use of Derivatives in Market Risk Management
A key component of hedging market risk exposure is the use of derivative transactions. The following table presents the notional amounts of the derivatives classified by how we designate the hedging relationship. The notional amount of derivatives at December 31, 2019 increased2020 decreased by $31.8$19.5 billion from the end of 2018,2019, primarily driven by actions taken in 2019due to reduce the repricing riskour use of termunswapped Discount Notes byand unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds rather than swapping them to variable rates and due to purchasesDiscount Notes in the current market environment.
(In millions) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Hedged Item/Hedging InstrumentHedging ObjectiveFair Value HedgeEconomic HedgeFair Value HedgeEconomic Hedge
Advances:
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.$7,409 $$7,449 $
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (with options)Converts the Advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the Advance.2,664 27 1,327 155 
Pay-float with embedded features, receive-float interest rate swap (callable)Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by offsetting embedded option risk in the Advance.— — 200 — 
Total Advances10,073 32 8,976 160 
Investment securities:
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the investment security's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.274 9,817 124 11,202 
Mortgage Loans:
Forward settlement agreementProtects against changes in market value of fixed-rate Mandatory Delivery Contracts resulting from changes in interest rates.— — — 849 
Consolidated Obligations Bonds:
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.131 2,241 — 4,709 
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (with options)Converts the Bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the Bond.— — 210 30 
Total Consolidated Obligations
Bonds
131 2,241 210 4,739 
Consolidated Discount Notes:
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Discount Note's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.— — — 12,401 
Balance Sheet:
Pay-float, receive-fixed interest-rate swapInterest-rate swap not linked to a specific asset, liability or forecasted transaction.— 589 — — 
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest-rate swapInterest-rate swap not linked to a specific asset, liability or forecasted transaction.— 589 — — 
Interest rate swaptionsProvides the option to enter into an interest rate swap to offset interest-rate or prepayment risk.— 2,175 — 6,000 
Total Balance Sheet— 3,353 — 6,000 
Stand-Alone Derivatives:
Mandatory Delivery ContractsExposure to fair-value risk associated with fixed rate mortgage purchase commitments.— 137 — 936 
Total $10,478 $15,580 $9,310 $36,287 
57

Table of fixed rate U.S. Treasury obligations throughout 2019 and swapping them to a variable rate.Contents
(In millions) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Hedged Item/Hedging InstrumentHedging ObjectiveFair Value HedgeEconomic Hedge Fair Value HedgeEconomic Hedge
Advances:      
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.$7,449
$5
 $5,408
$10
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (with options)Converts the Advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the Advance.1,327
155
 493
150
Pay-float with embedded features, receive-float interest rate swap (callable)Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by offsetting embedded option risk in the Advance.200

 

Total Advances 8,976
160
 5,901
160
Investment securities:      
Pay-fixed, receive-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the investment security's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.124
11,202
 52
222
Mortgage Loans:      
Forward settlement agreementProtects against changes in market value of fixed-rate Mandatory Delivery Contracts resulting from changes in interest rates.
849
 
131
Consolidated Obligations Bonds:      
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
4,709
 15
3,376
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (with options)Converts the Bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the Bond.210
30
 239
565
Total Consolidated Obligations
   Bonds
 210
4,739
 254
3,941
Consolidated Discount Notes:      
Receive-fixed, pay-float interest rate swap (without options)Converts the Discount Note's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
12,401
 

Balance Sheet:      
Interest rate swaptionsProvides the option to enter into an interest rate swap to offset interest-rate or prepayment risk.
6,000
 
3,000
Stand-Alone Derivatives:      
Mandatory Delivery ContractsExposure to fair-value risk associated with fixed rate mortgage purchase commitments.
936
 
146
Total $9,310
$36,287
 $6,207
$7,600

See Note 117 of the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information on how we use derivatives and the types of assets and liabilities hedged with derivatives.


Capital Adequacy

Retained Earnings
We must hold sufficient capital to protect against exposure to various risks, including market, credit, and operational. We regularly conduct a variety of measurements and assessments for capital adequacy. At December 31, 2019,2020, our capital management policy set forth a range of $200 million to $375approximately $290 million as the minimum amount of retained earnings we believe is necessary to mitigate impairment risk and to provide for dividend stability from factors that could cause earnings to be volatile.

risk.

The following table presents retained earnings.
(In millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018(In millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Unrestricted retained earnings$648
 $632
Unrestricted retained earnings$803 $648 
Restricted retained earnings (1)
446
 391
Restricted retained earnings (1)
501 446 
Total retained earnings$1,094
 $1,023
Total retained earnings$1,304 $1,094 
(1)Pursuant to the FHLBank System's Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement we are not permitted to distribute as dividends.
(1)     Pursuant to the FHLBank System's Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement we are not permitted to distribute as dividends.

As indicated in the table above, our current balance of retained earnings exceeds the policy range,minimum, which we expect will continue to be the case as we bolster capital adequacy over time by allocating a portion of earnings to the restricted retained earnings account.

Risk-Based Capital
The following table shows the amount of risk-based capital required based on Finance Agency prescribed measurements. By regulation, we are required to hold permanent capital at least equal to the amount of risk-based capital.
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Market risk-based capital$211 $264 
Credit risk-based capital204 367 
Operational risk-based capital124 190 
Total risk-based capital requirement539 821 
Total permanent capital3,964 4,483 
Excess permanent capital$3,425 $3,662 
Risk-based capital as a percent of permanent capital14 %18 %
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019 Monthly Average 2019 December 31, 2018
Market risk-based capital$264
 $249
 $327
Credit risk-based capital367
 377
 317
Operational risk-based capital190
 187
 194
Total risk-based capital requirement821
 813
 838
Total permanent capital4,483
 4,921
 5,366
Excess permanent capital$3,662
 $4,108
 $4,528
Risk-based capital as a percent of permanent capital18% 17% 16%

The risk-based capital requirement has historically not been a constraint on operations, and we do not use it to actively manage any of our risks. It has normally ranged from 10 to 20 percent of permanent capital. As noted in the "Business Outlook and Risk Management" section of the "Executive Overview," in 2019, the Finance Agency issued a revised risk-based capital calculation effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The revised calculation will not materially change the overall amount of risk-based capital required.

Dodd-Frank Stress Test
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, all FHLBanks are required to perform an annual stress test for capital adequacy. We completed and published the test in November 2019, based on our financial condition as of December 31, 2018 and the methodology prescribed by the Finance Agency. Capital adequacy was sufficient under all established scenarios to fully absorb losses under both adverse and severely adverse economic conditions.

In December 2019, the Finance Agency published a proposed rule amending its stress testing rule that, among other things, would raise the minimum threshold to conduct periodic stress tests to those regulated entities with consolidated assets of more than $250 billion, which otherwise eliminates the requirements for the FHLBanks to conduct stress tests.

Market Capitalization Ratios
We measure two sets of market capitalization ratios. One measures the market value of equity (i.e., total capital) relative to the par value of regulatory capital stock (which is GAAP capital stock and mandatorily redeemable capital stock). The other measures the market value of total capital relative to the book value of total capital, which includes all components of capital, and mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The measures provide a point-in-time indication of the FHLB's liquidation or

franchise value and can also serve as a measure of realized or potential market risk exposure. The down shocks used are either 100 or 200 basis points depending on the benchmark interest rate levels at the time.


58

Table of Contents
The following table presents the market value of equity to regulatory capital stock (excluding retained earnings) for several interest rate environments.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario129% 119%Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario144 %129 %
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Down Shock (1)
125
 113
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Down Shock (1)
143 125 
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Up Shock (2)
124
 114
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Up Shock (2)
142 124 
(1)Given the level of interest rates at the time, this scenario represents down shocks of 100 basis points at December 31, 2019 and 200 basis points at December 31, 2018.
(2)Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.
(1)    Represents a down shock of 100 basis points.
(2)    Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.

A base case value below 100 percent could indicate that, in the remote event of an immediate liquidation scenario involving redemption of all capital stock, capital stock may be returned to stockholders at a value below par. This could be due to experiencing risks that lower the market value of capital and/or to having an insufficient amount of retained earnings. In 2019,2020, the market capitalization ratios in the scenarios presented continued to be above our policy requirements. The base case ratio at December 31, 20192020 was well above 100 percent becauseand increased relative to year-end 2019. The increase was driven primarily by the growth in retained earnings, were 32which rose to 49 percent of regulatory capital stock, combined with declining stock balances and we maintainedstable market risk exposures at moderate levels.exposure.

The following table presents the market value of equity to the book value of total capital and mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario (1)
97 %98 %
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Down Shock (1)(2)
96 95 
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Up Shock (1)(3)
96 94 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario (1)
98% 96%
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Down Shock (1)(2)
95
 92
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Up Shock (1)(3)
94
 93
(1)    Capital includes total capital and mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
(1)Capital includes total capital and mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
(2)Given the level of interest rates at the time, this scenario represents down shocks of 100 basis points at December 31, 2019 and 200 basis points at December 31, 2018.
(3)Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.
(2)    Represents a down shock of 100 basis points.
(3)    Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.

A base-case value below 100 percent indicates that we have realized or could realize risks (especially market risk), such that the market value of total capital owned by stockholders is below the book value of total capital. The base-case ratio of 9897 percent at December 31, 20192020 indicates that the market value of total capital is $95$114 million below the book value of total capital. In a scenario in which interest rates increase 200 basis points, the market value of total capital would be $254$172 million below the book value of total capital. This indicates that in a liquidation scenario, stockholders would not receive the full sum of their total equity ownership in the FHLB. We believe the likelihood of a liquidation scenario is extremely remote; and therefore, we accept the risk of diluting equity ownership in such a scenario.

Credit Risk

Overview
Our business entails a significant amount of inherent credit risk exposure. We believe our risk management practices, discussed below, bring the amount ofminimize residual credit risk to a minimal level.levels. We have no loan loss reserves or impairment recorded for Credit Services, investments, and derivatives andor derivatives. We have a minimal amount of legacy credit risk exposure toin the MPP.

Credit Services
Overview: We have policies and practices to manage credit risk exposure from our secured lending activities, which include Advances and Letters of Credit. The objective of our credit risk management activities is to equalize risk exposure across members and counterparties to a zero level of expected losses,losses. This approach is consistent with our conservative risk management principles and desire to have no residual credit risk related to member borrowings.Advances and Letters of Credit.


Collateral: We require each member to provide a security interest in eligible collateral before it can undertake any secured borrowing. Eligible loan collateral includes single-family loans,types include the following: single- and multi-family loans,residential, home equity, loans and lines of credit, commercial real estate, bond securitiesgovernment guaranteed and farm real estate. Eligible security types include those that are government or agency backed, along with highly-rated private-label residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities. We have conservative
59

Table of Contents
eligibility criteria within each of the above asset types. The estimated value of pledged collateral is discounted in order to offset market, credit, and liquidity risks that may affect the collateral's realizable value in the event it must be liquidated. Over-collateralization by one member is not applied to another member. At December 31, 2019, our policy of over-collateralization resulted in2020, total collateral pledged of $364.8$399.0 billion to serve members'resulted in total borrowing capacity of $290.1$315.9 billion of which $63.5$53.8 billion was used to support outstanding Advances and Letters of Credit. Borrowers often pledge collateral in excess of their collateral requirement to demonstrate availableaccess to liquidity and to have the ability to borrow additional amounts in the future. TheOver-collateralization by one member is not applied to another member. As noted in the "Regulatory and Legislative Risk and Significant Developments" section of the "Executive Overview," in 2020, we began accepting government guaranteed loans as collateral in the form of Small Business Administration (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program loans. Otherwise, collateral composition remained relatively stable compared to the end of 2018.2019.

The table below shows the total collateral pledged collateral (unadjusted for Lendable Value Rates).by type.

December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
(Dollars in billions)  Percent of Total   Percent of Total(Dollars in billions)Percent of TotalPercent of Total
Collateral Amount Pledged Collateral Collateral Amount Pledged Collateral Collateral AmountPledged CollateralCollateral AmountPledged Collateral
Single family loans$208.9
 57% $204.6
 59%Single family loans$226.6 57 %$208.9 57 %
Multi-family loans68.4
 19
 60.1
 17
Multi-family loans60.0 15 68.4 19 
Commercial real estate46.3
 13
 43.3
 13
Commercial real estate loansCommercial real estate loans48.0 12 46.3 13 
Bond SecuritiesBond Securities26.1 11.3 
Home equity loans/lines of credit29.2
 8
 27.9
 8
Home equity loans/lines of credit25.2 29.2 
Bond Securities11.3
 3
 11.4
 3
Farm real estate0.7
 
 0.7
 
Government guaranteed loansGovernment guaranteed loans12.4 — — 
Farm real estate loansFarm real estate loans0.7 — 0.7 — 
Total$364.8
 100% $348.0
 100%Total$399.0 100 %$364.8 100 %

At December 31, 2019, 652020, 63 percent of collateral was related to residential mortgage lending in single-family loans and home equity loans/lines of credit.

We assign each member oneOur management of three levelscredit risk related to Advances and Letters of Credit includes risk-based variations in collateral status: Blanket, Listing,requirements, including discounts or Delivery. Assignment is based on a numberhaircuts, eligibility criteria, form of factors, including credit ratings, regulatory ratings, problem loan levels and stressed capitalization. Blanket collateral status, which we assign to approximately 88 percent of borrowers, is the least restrictive status and is available to lower-risk bank and credit union members. Approximately 63 percent of pledged collateral is under Blanket status. We monitorvaluation, custody arrangements, the level of eligibledetail in periodic reporting, and in blanket versus specific pledges, as discussed below.

Haircuts. We discount collateral values for purposes of determining borrowing capacity. These haircuts result in lendable values that are less than the amount of pledged under Blanket status using quarterly regulatory financial reports or periodic collateral “Certification” documents submitted by all significant borrowers.

Under Listing collateral status, a member provides us detailed information on specifically identified individual loans that meet certain minimum qualifications. Securitiescollateral. In general, higher discounts are applied to more risky forms of collateral and loanto collateral pledged by higher risk members.
Eligibility. The balances of loans and securities we lend against are subject to conservative eligibility criteria such that Advances and Letters of Credit are supported by high quality assets within each collateral type.
Custody. All pledged securities and loans pledged by higher risk members in Listing statusmust be delivered into our custody or that of a third-party custodian that we have engaged.
Blanket versus Specific Pledge. Except under limited circumstances, we require a member pledging loans under a blanket agreement to pledge all of their loans for a given collateral type.
Valuation. All members' securities collateral and individually listed loans are subject to a periodic market valuation process to establish the borrowing base. For loan collateral, this involves submission of extensive loan level information (on "Listings") to facilitate the valuation process. DeliveryAny member allowed to make a specific instead of a blanket pledge (non-depositories and certain highly-rated commercial banks) is the most restrictive collateral status, which we assignrequired to members experiencing significant financial difficulties, insurance companies, Community Development Financial Institutions and newly chartered institutions. We require borrowers in Delivery status to deliver into our custody securities and/or original notes, mortgages or deedssubmit this level of trust. Under any collateral status, members may elect to pledge bond securities, which we either hold in our custody or, less often, have third parties control on our behalf.reporting.

We use third-party services and internally run models to regularly estimate market values of collateral under Listing and Delivery status.individually listed loan collateral. Third-party services use various proprietary models to estimate market values. Assumptions may be made on factors that affect collateral value, such as market liquidity, discount rates, prepayments, liquidation and servicing costs in the event of a default and economic and market conditions. We have policies and procedures for evaluating the reasonableness of collateral valuations.

Borrowing Capacity/Lendable Value: We determine borrowing capacity against pledged collateral by applying collateral discounts, or haircuts, to the value of the collateral. These haircuts result in Lendable Value Rates (LVRs) that are less thanrepresent the amountpercent of pledged collateral.

collateral value net of the haircut. LVRs are determined by statistical analysis and management assumptions relating to historical price volatility, inherent credit risks, liquidation costs, and the current credit and economic environment. We apply LVR results to the estimated values
60

Table of Contents
of pledged assets. LVRs vary among pledged assets and members based on the member institution type, the financial strength of the member institution, the form of valuation, lien position, the issuer of bond collateral or the quality of securitized assets, the quality of the loan collateral as reflected in the manner in which it was underwritten, and the marketability of the pledged assets.


The table below indicates the range of lendable values remaining after the application of LVRs for each major collateral type pledged at December 31, 2019.2020.

Lending ValuesLendable Value Rates Applied to Collateral
Blanket Status:
Prime 1-4 family loans75-80%69-78%
Multi-family loans65-76%73-83%
Prime home equity loans/lines of credit41-81%44-74%
Commercial real estate loans72-84%73-83%
Farm real estate loans69-81%70-81%
Listing Status/Physical Delivery:
Cash/U.S. Government/U.S. Treasury/U.S. agency securities91-100%87-100%
U.S. agency residential MBS/collateralized mortgage obligations91-97%88-96%
U.S. agency commercial MBS/collateralized mortgage obligations78-91%
Private-label residential MBS66-92%62-89%
Private-label commercial MBS55-91%49-85%
Municipal securities79-95%75-94%
Small Business AdministrationSBA certificates92-95%87-93%
Prime 1-4 family loans75-86%72-85%
Multi-family loans69-80%74-87%
Prime home equity loans/lines of credit64-86%64-85%
Commercial real estate loans75-86%80-91%
Farm real estate loans75-82%67-88%
SBA Paycheck Protection Program loans10-90%

The ranges of lendable values exclude subprime residential loan collateral. Loans pledged by lower risk members for which we require only high level, summary reporting of eligible balances are generally discounted more heavily than loans on which we have detailed loan structure and underwriting information. For any form of loan collateral, additional credit risk based adjustments may be made to an individual member’s collateral that results in a lower lendable value than that indicated in the above table.

Subprime Loan Collateral: We have policies and processes to identify subprime residential mortgage loans pledged by members. We perform collateral reviews to estimate the volume of subprime loans pledged by members in blanket status. Depending on the quality of underwriting and administration, we may subject these loans to lower LVRs.
 
Internal Credit Ratings: We perform credit underwriting of our members and nonmember borrowersinstitutions and assign them an internal credit rating on a scale of one to seven, with a higher number representing a less favorable assessment of the institution's financial condition. These credit ratings are based on internal and third-party ratings models, credit analyses and consideration of credit ratings from independent credit rating organizations. Credit ratings are used in conjunction with other measures of credit risk in managing secured credit risk exposure.

A less favorable credit rating can cause us to 1) decrease the institution's borrowing capacity via lower LVRs, 2) require the institution to provide an increased level of detail on pledged collateral, 3) require it to deliver collateral into our custody, 4) prompt us to more closely and/or frequently monitor the institution, and/or 5) limit the institution's exposure through borrowing restrictions (e.g., maturity restrictions on new Advances or restrictions on borrowing capacity from higher risk collateral sources).


61

Table of Contents
The following tables show the distribution of internal credit ratings we assigned to member and nonmember borrowers,institutions, which we use to help manage credit risk exposure.
(Dollars in billions)      
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Borrowers   Borrowers
    Collateral-Based     Collateral-Based
Credit   Borrowing Credit   Borrowing
Rating Number Capacity Rating Number Capacity
1-3 485
 $276.3
 1-3 486
 $272.2
4 119
 12.6
 4 131
 11.0
5 37
 1.1
 5 26
 0.4
6 6
 0.1
 6 5
 0.1
7 5
 
 7 7
 
Total 652
 $290.1
 Total 655
 $283.7

(Dollars in billions)     
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
  Number Collateral-Based  Number Collateral-Based
Credit of BorrowingCredit of Borrowing
Rating InstitutionsCapacityRating InstitutionsCapacity
1-3 441  $282.6  1-3 485  $276.3 
4 141  31.7  4 119  12.6 
5 36  1.3  5 37  1.1 
6 13  0.3  6  0.1 
7  —  7  — 
Total 636  $315.9  Total 652  $290.1 

We consider membersinstitutions with credit ratings of "1" through "4" to be financially sound institutions.sound. At December 31, 2019,2020, only 48 borrowers (seven54 institutions (eight percent of the total) had credit ratings of "5" through "7," an increase of 10 borrowerssix compared to the end of 2018.2019. These membersinstitutions had $1.2$1.6 billion of borrowing capacity at December 31, 2019.2020. We believe the credit rating distribution continues to show a financially sound membership base.

Member Failures, Closures, and Receiverships: There were twono member failures in 2019. We had no outstanding exposure to these institutions and the failure of these members did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.2020.

MPP
Overview: The residual amount of credit risk exposure to loans in the MPP is minimal, based on the following factors:

various credit enhancements for conventional loans, which are designed to protect us against credit losses;
conservative underwriting and loan characteristics consistent with favorable expected credit performance;
a small overall amount of delinquencies and defaults when compared to national averages;
credit losses totaling $0.2 million in 2019 and $19.2 million since the introduction of the program in 2000, which represent an immaterial percentage of conventional loans' current unpaid principal balances at December 31, 2019 and of total purchases-to-date for the entire MPP; and
in addition to the low program-to-date credit losses, based on financial analysis, we believe that future credit losses will not harm capital adequacy and will not significantly affect profitability except under the most extreme and unlikely credit conditions.
various credit enhancements for conventional loans, which are designed to protect us against credit losses;
conservative underwriting and loan characteristics consistent with favorable expected credit performance;
a small overall amount of delinquencies and defaults when compared to national averages;
credit losses totaling $0.1 million in 2020 and $19.3 million since the introduction of the program in 2000, which represent an immaterial percentage of conventional loans' current unpaid principal balances at December 31, 2020 and of total purchases-to-date for the entire MPP; and
in addition to the low program-to-date credit losses, based on financial analysis, we believe that future credit losses will not harm capital adequacy and will not significantly affect profitability except under the most extreme and unlikely credit conditions.

Portfolio Loan Characteristics: The following table shows FICO® credit scores of homeowners at origination dates for the conventional loan portfolio.
FICO® Score (1)                    
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
< 620— % — %
620 to < 660—  — 
660 to < 700 
700 to < 74017  17 
>= 74077  77 
Weighted Average765  765 
FICO® Score (1)                    
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
< 620 % %
620 to < 660 
 
660 to < 700 6
 6
700 to < 740 17
 17
>= 740 77
 77
     
Weighted Average 765
 765
(1)Represents the FICO® score at origination.
(1)
Represents the FICO

® score at origination.

There was no change in the distribution of FICO® scores at origination in 20192020 compared to 2018.2019. The distribution of FICO® scores at origination is one indication of the portfolio's overall favorable credit quality. At December 31, 2019,2020, 77 percent of the

portfolio had scores at an excellent level of 740 or above and 94 percent had scores above 700, which is a threshold generally considered indicative of homeowners with good credit quality.

62

Table of Contents
The following tables show loan-to-value ratios for conventional loans based on values estimated at the origination dates and current values estimated at the noted periods. The estimated current ratios are based on original loan values, principal paydowns that have occurred since origination, and a third-party estimate of changes in historical home prices for the zip code in which each loan resides. Both measures are weighted by current unpaid principal.

 Based on Estimated Origination Value  Based On Estimated Current Value Based on Estimated Origination Value Based On Estimated Current Value
Loan-to-Value December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Loan-to-Value December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018Loan-to-ValueDecember 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Loan-to-ValueDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
<= 60% 13% 13% <= 60% 48% 40%<= 60%15 % 13 % <= 60% 60 % 48 %
> 60% to 70% 15
 14
 > 60% to 70% 26
 27
> 60% to 70%16  15  > 60% to 70% 28  26 
> 70% to 80% 58
 58
 > 70% to 80% 23
 27
> 70% to 80%55  58  > 70% to 80% 11  23 
> 80% to 90% 9
 9
 > 80% to 90% 3
 5
> 80% to 90%  > 80% to 90%  
> 90% 5
 6
 > 90% to 100% 
 1
> 90%  > 90% to 100% —  — 
     > 100% 
 
 > 100% —  — 
Weighted Average 74% 74% Weighted Average 59% 62%Weighted Average73 % 74 % Weighted Average 55 % 59 %

The levels of loan-to-value ratios are consistent with the portfolio's excellent credit quality. At December 31, 2019,2020, we estimated that threeone percent of loans have current loan-to-value ratios above 80 percent, compared to sixthree percent at the end of 2018.2019. The improvement in the 20192020 current loan-to-value ratios reflected the fourapproximately six percent average increase in housing prices nationwide during the year.

Based on the available data, we believe we have minimal exposure to loans in the MPP considered to have characteristics of “subprime” or “alternative/nontraditional” loans. Further, we do not knowingly purchase any loan that violates the terms of our Anti-Predatory Lending Policy.

The following table presents the geographical allocation based on the unpaid principal balance of conventional loans in the MPP.
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Ohio63 %Ohio60 %
Kentucky13 Kentucky13 
Indiana10 Indiana11 
TennesseeTennessee
MichiganMichigan
All others10 All others12 
Total100 %Total100 %
 December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018
Ohio60% Ohio61%
Kentucky13
 Kentucky13
Indiana11
 Indiana11
Tennessee3
 Tennessee3
Michigan1
 Michigan1
All others12
 All others11
Total100% Total100%

Credit Enhancements: Conventional mortgage loans are supported against credit losses by various combinations of primary mortgage insurance (PMI), supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) (for loans purchased before February 2011), and the Lender Risk Account (LRA). The LRA is a hold back of a portion of the initial purchase price to cover expected credit losses for a specific pool of loans. Starting after five years from the loan purchase date, we may return the hold back to PFIs if they manage credit risk to predefined acceptable levels of exposure on the loan pools they sell to us. As a result, some pools of loans may have sufficient credit enhancements to recapture all losses while other pools of loans may not. The LRA had balances of $233$246 million and $213$233 million at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. For more information, see Note 106 of the Notes to Financial Statements.


63

Table of Contents
Credit Performance: The table below provides an analysis of conventional loans delinquent or in the process of foreclosure, along with the national average serious delinquency rate.
Conventional Loan Delinquencies
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Early stage delinquencies - unpaid principal balance (1)
$49  $40 
Serious delinquencies - unpaid principal balance (2)
$64  $12 
Early stage delinquency rate (3)
0.5 %0.4 %
Serious delinquency rate (4)
0.7 % 0.1 %
National average serious delinquency rate (5)
3.7 % 1.3 %
 Conventional Loan Delinquencies
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Early stage delinquencies - unpaid principal balance (1)
$40
 $36
Serious delinquencies - unpaid principal balance (2)
$12
 $13
Early stage delinquency rate (3)
0.4% 0.4%
Serious delinquency rate (4)
0.1% 0.1%
National average serious delinquency rate (5)
1.3% 1.6%
(1)(1)Includes conventional loans 30 to 89 days delinquent and not in foreclosure.
(2)Includes conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported.
(3)Early stage delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.
(4)Serious delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.
(5)
National average number of fixed-rate prime and subprime conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure is based on the most recent national delinquency data available. The December 31, 2019 rate is based on September 30, 2019 data.

(2)Includes conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported.
(3)Early stage delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.
(4)Serious delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.
(5)National average number of fixed-rate prime and subprime conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure is based on the most recent national delinquency data available. The December 31, 2020 rate is based on September 30, 2020 data.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our mortgage loan servicers may grant a forbearance period to borrowers who have had COVID-19 related hardships such as illness, unemployment or loss of income when homeowners meet certain eligibility requirements. These forbearances do not alter the underlying terms of the loans, and loans not paid timely are considered past due. As a result, early stage and serious delinquencies increased in 2020. At December 31, 2020, $15 million and $51 million of conventional loans with an early stage and serious delinquency, respectively, were under a forbearance plan. Overall, the MPP has experienced a minimal amount of delinquencies, with the serious delinquency raterates continuing to be well below national averages.

We consider a high risk loan as having a current loan-to-value ratio above 100 percent. At December 31, 2020, we had a de minimis number of loans with a current loan-to-value ratio above 100 percent and none of them were seriously delinquent. Historically, high risk loans have experienced a minimal amount of serious delinquencies (i.e., delinquencies that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure). For example, of the $0.2 million of conventional principal balances with current estimated loan-to-values above 100 percent at December 31, 2019, none of them were seriously delinquent.delinquencies. We believe these data further support our view that the overall portfolio is comprised of high-quality, well-performing loans.

Credit Losses: The following table shows the effects of credit enhancements on the estimation of credit losses at the noted periods. Estimated incurred credit losses, after credit enhancements, are accounted for in the allowance for credit losslosses or as a charge off (i.e., a reduction to the principal of mortgage loans held for portfolio). Our methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans changed on January 1, 2020 with the adoption of new accounting guidance on the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the prior period has not been revised to conform to the new basis of accounting.

(In millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018(In millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Estimated incurred credit losses, before credit enhancements$4
 $4
Estimated credit losses, before credit enhancementsEstimated credit losses, before credit enhancements$$
Estimated amounts deemed recoverable by:   Estimated amounts deemed recoverable by:
Primary mortgage insurance
 (1)Primary mortgage insurance(1)— 
Supplemental mortgage insurance(2) (1)Supplemental mortgage insurance(1)(2)
Lender Risk Account(1) (1)Lender Risk Account(6)(1)
Estimated incurred credit losses, after credit enhancements$1
 $1
Estimated credit losses, after credit enhancementsEstimated credit losses, after credit enhancements$— $
The minimal amount of incurredestimated credit losses provides further evidence of the aggregateoverall health of the portfolio. CreditAs a result of adopting new accounting guidance, the estimated credit losses before credit enhancements increased at December 31, 2020 as our estimate now includes a forecast of housing prices, including the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Residual credit risk exposure depends on the actual and potential credit performance of the loans in each pool compared to the pool's equity (on individual loans) and credit enhancements, including PMI, the LRA, and SMI. WeOur available credit enhancements at December 31, 2020 were ample and able to cover the increase in estimated gross credit losses. In addition, we have assessed that we do not have any credit risk exposure to our PMI providers, and our estimation of credit exposure to SMI providers was not material at December 31, 2020 or 2019.

In addition to the
64

Table of Contents
Separate from our allowance for credit losses recorded,analysis, we regularly analyze potential rangesadverse scenarios of additional lifetime credit risk exposure for the loans in the MPP. Even under adverse macroeconomic scenarios, including the increased delinquencies as a result of COVID-19 related forbearances, we expect that further credit losses would not significantly decrease profitability.


Investments
Liquidity Investments: We purchase liquidity investments from counterparties that have a strong ability to repay principal and interest. LiquidityThese investments are either short-term, or longer-term, but can be easily converted to cash and may be unsecured, guaranteed or supported by the U.S. government, or secured (i.e., collateralized). For unsecured liquidity investments, we invest in the debt securities of highly rated, investment-grade institutions, have appropriate and conservative limits on dollar and maturity exposure to each institution, and have strong credit underwriting practices, including active monitoring of credit quality of our counterparties and of the environment in which they operate.

Our unsecured liquidity investments to a counterparty or group of affiliated counterparties are limited by Finance Agency regulations to maturities of no more than nine months and limited to a dollar amount based on a percentage of eligible regulatory capital (defined as the lessor of our regulatory capital or the eligible amount of a counterparty's Tier 1 capital). The permissible percentage ranges from one1 percent to 15 percent. Through December 31, 2019, the range was based on the counterparty's lowest long-term credit rating of its debt from an NRSRO. In addition, pursuant to a Finance Agency regulation, we complemented reliance on NRSRO ratings for unsecured investment activity by also considering internal credit risk analytics on unsecured counterparties. Effective January 1, 2020, the permissible range is solely based on consideration of the internal credit risk ratings of unsecured counterparties as required by the Finance Agency's final rule issued in 2019. We do not expect theThe dollar amount limits to our unsecured liquidity investment counterparties todid not change materially as a result of this new rule.

65

Table of Contents
The lowest long-term credit rating for a counterparty to which we are permitted to extend credit is double-B. However, we have generally invested funds only in those eligible institutions with long-term credit ratings of at least single-A. In addition, we restrict maturities, reduce dollar exposure, and avoid new investments with counterparties we deem to represent elevated credit risk. Furthermore, a portion of our total liquidity investments are with counterparties for which the investments are secured with collateral (secured resale agreements). We believe these investments present no credit risk exposure to us.

The following table presents the carrying value of liquidity investments outstanding in relation to the counterparties' lowest long-term credit ratings provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services. For resale agreements, the ratings shown are based on ratings of the associated collateral. Our internal ratings of these investments may differ from those obtained from Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services. The historical or current ratings displayed in this table should not be taken as an indication of future ratings.

(In millions)December 31, 2019(In millions)December 31, 2020
Long-Term RatingLong-Term Rating
AA A TotalAAATotal
Unsecured Liquidity Investments     Unsecured Liquidity Investments
Interest-bearing deposits$
 $550
 $550
Interest-bearing deposits$— $555 $555 
Federal funds sold1,023
 3,810
 4,833
Federal funds sold500 3,740 4,240 
Certificates of deposit500
 910
 1,410
Total unsecured liquidity investments1,523
 5,270
 6,793
Total unsecured liquidity investments500 4,295 4,795 
Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments     Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,349
 
 2,349
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,818 — 1,818 
U.S. Treasury obligations9,662
 
 9,662
U.S. Treasury obligations8,404 — 8,404 
GSE obligations2,120
 
 2,120
GSE obligations2,268 — 2,268 
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments14,131
 
 14,131
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments12,490 — 12,490 
Total liquidity investments$15,654
 $5,270
 $20,924
Total liquidity investments$12,990 $4,295 $17,285 
December 31, 2019
Long-Term Rating
AAATotal
Unsecured Liquidity Investments
Interest-bearing deposits$— $550 $550 
Federal funds sold1,023 3,810 4,833 
Certificates of deposit500 910 1,410 
Total unsecured liquidity investments1,523 5,270 6,793 
Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,349 — 2,349 
U.S. Treasury obligations9,662 — 9,662 
GSE obligations2,120 — 2,120 
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments14,131 — 14,131 
Total liquidity investments$15,654 $5,270 $20,924 
 December 31, 2018
 Long-Term Rating
 AA A Total
Unsecured Liquidity Investments     
Federal funds sold$5,640
 $5,153
 $10,793
Certificates of deposit800
 1,550
 2,350
Total unsecured liquidity investments6,440
 6,703
 13,143
Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments     
Securities purchased under agreements to resell4,402
 
 4,402
U.S. Treasury obligations36
 
 36
GSE obligations277
 
 277
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments4,715
 
 4,715
Total liquidity investments$11,155
 $6,703
 $17,858


During 2019, we increasedAt the end of 2020, our balance of liquidity investments primarily through the purchases of U.S. Treasury obligationsdecreased as we decided to hold more effectively meet the expanded regulatory liquidity requirements. In addition, a portion of our total liquidity investmentsportfolio as deposits at the Federal Reserve in anticipation of volatile market conditions. At December 31, 2020, we held $3.0 billion in deposits at the Federal Reserve, which are with counterparties for whichreflected in cash and due from banks on the investments are secured with collateral (secured resale agreements). We believe these investments present no credit risk exposure to us.Statements of Condition.

66


Table of Contents
The following table presents the lowest long-term credit ratings provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services of our unsecured investment credit exposuresexposure by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty's immediate parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. Our internal ratings of these investments may differ from those obtained from Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services. The historical or current ratings displayed in this table should not be taken as an indication of future ratings.

(In millions) December 31, 2019(In millions)December 31, 2020
 Counterparty Rating  Counterparty Rating
Domicile of Counterparty AA A TotalDomicile of CounterpartyAAATotal
Domestic $238
 $1,950
 $2,188
Domestic$— $755 $755 
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:      U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Canada 500
 360
 860
Canada250 1,920 2,170 
Switzerland 
 810
 810
Germany 
 800
 800
United Kingdom 
 800
 800
Australia 685
 
 685
Australia— 710 710 
Netherlands 
 550
 550
Netherlands— 710 710 
Norway 100
 
 100
FinlandFinland250 — 250 
FranceFrance— 200 200 
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks 1,285
 3,320
 4,605
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks500 3,540 4,040 
Total unsecured investment credit exposure $1,523
 $5,270
 $6,793
Total unsecured investment credit exposure$500 $4,295 $4,795 

The following table presents the remaining contractual maturity of our unsecured investment credit exposure by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty's immediate parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.

(In millions) December 31, 2019
Domicile of Counterparty Overnight Due 2 days through 30 days Due 31 days through 90 days Total
Domestic $2,188
 $
 $
 $2,188
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:        
Canada 250
 110
 500
 860
Switzerland 810
 
 
 810
Germany 
 800
 
 800
United Kingdom 800
 
 
 800
Australia 685
 
 
 685
Netherlands 550
 
 
 550
Norway 100
 
 
 100
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks 3,195
 910
 500
 4,605
Total unsecured investment credit exposure $5,383
 $910
 $500
 $6,793

(In millions)December 31, 2020
Domicile of CounterpartyOvernightTotal
Domestic$755 $755 
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Canada2,170 2,170 
Australia710 710 
Netherlands710 710 
Finland250 250 
France200 200 
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks4,040 4,040 
Total unsecured investment credit exposure$4,795 $4,795 

At December 31, 2019,2020, all of the $6.8$4.8 billion of unsecured investment exposure was to counterparties with holding companies domiciled in countries receiving either AAA or AA long-term sovereign ratings. Furthermore, we restrict a significant portion of unsecured lending to overnight maturities, which further limits risk exposure to these counterparties. By Finance Agency regulation, all counterparties exposed to non-U.S. countries are required to be domestic U.S. branches of foreign counterparties.


MBS:

GSE MBS
At December 31, 2019, $11.82020, $8.7 billion of MBS held were GSE securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which provide credit safeguards by guaranteeing either timely or ultimate payments of principal and interest. We believe that the conservatorships of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lower the chance that they would not be able to fulfill their credit guarantees and that the securities issued by these two GSEs are effectively government guaranteed. In addition, based on the data available to us and our purchase practices, we believe that most of the mortgage loans backing our GSE MBS are of high quality with acceptable credit performance.


67

Table of Contents
MBS Issued by Other Government Agencies
We also invest in MBS issued and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and the NCUA.Mae. These investments totaled $1.7$1.0 billion at December 31, 2019.2020. We believe that the strength of the issuers' guaranteesGinnie Mae's guarantee and backing by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government is sufficient to protect us against credit losses on these securities.

Derivatives
Credit Risk Exposure: We mitigate most of the credit risk exposure resulting from derivative transactions through collateralization or use of daily settled contracts. The table below presents the lowest long-term counterparty credit ratings provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services for derivative positions to which we had credit risk exposure at December 31, 2019. The historical or current ratings displayed in this table should not be taken as an indication of future ratings.2020.

(In millions)        (In millions) 
 Total Notional Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral Cash Collateral Pledged to (from) Counterparties Net Credit Exposure to CounterpartiesTotal NotionalNet Derivatives Fair Value Before CollateralCash Collateral Pledged to (from) CounterpartiesNet Credit Exposure to Counterparties
Nonmember counterparties:        Nonmember counterparties:
Asset positions with credit exposure:        Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:        
AA-rated $584
 $1
 $(1) $
A-rated 13
 
 
 
Total uncleared derivatives 597
 1
 (1) 
Cleared derivatives (1)
 29,785
 13
 242
 255
Cleared derivatives (1)
$464 $— $$
Liability positions with credit exposure:        Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:        
A-rated 2,170
 (4) 4
 
BBB-rated 2,520
 (38) 40
 2
Total uncleared derivatives 4,690
 (42) 44
 2
Cleared derivatives (1)
 6,104
 
 7
 7
Cleared derivatives (1)
20,591 (3)216 213 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties 41,176
 (28) 292
 264
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties21,055 (3)218 215 
Member institutions (2)
 814
 3
 
 3
Member institutions (2)
137 — 
Total $41,990
 $(25) $292
 $267
Total$21,192 $(2)$218 $216 
(1)Represents derivative transactions cleared with LCH Ltd. and CME Clearing, the FHLB's clearinghouses. LCH Ltd. is rated AA- by Standard & Poor's, and CME Clearing is not rated, but its parent company, CME Group Inc., is rated Aa3 by Moody's and AA- by Standard & Poor's.
(2)Represents Mandatory Delivery Contracts.

(1)Represents derivative transactions cleared with LCH Ltd. and CME Clearing, the FHLB's clearinghouses. LCH Ltd. is rated AA- by Standard & Poor's, and CME Clearing is not rated, but its parent company, CME Group Inc., is rated Aa3 by Moody's and AA- by Standard & Poor's.
(2)Represents Mandatory Delivery Contracts.

Our exposure to cleared derivatives is primarily associated with ourthe requirement to post initial margin through the clearing agent to the Derivatives Clearing Organizations. The amount ofWe pledge cash as collateral pledged asto satisfy this initial margin has increased from our use of cleared derivatives.requirement. However, the use of cleared derivatives mitigates credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties.

At December 31, 2019, the net exposure of2020, uncleared derivatives withhad no residual credit risk exposure was less than $3 million.exposure. If interest rates rise or the composition of our derivatives change resulting in an increase to our gross exposure to uncleared derivatives, the contractual collateral provisions in these derivatives would limit our net exposure to acceptable levels.

Although we cannot predict if we will realize credit risk losses from any of our derivatives counterparties, we believe that all of the counterparties will be able to continue making timely interest payments and, more generally, to continue to satisfy the terms and conditions of their derivative contracts with us. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had $491 million$0.4 billion of notional principal of interest rate swaps with one member, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which also had outstanding credit services with us. Due to the amount of market value collateralization, we had no outstanding credit exposure to this counterparty related to interest rate swaps outstanding.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity Overview
We strive to be in a liquidity position at all times to meet the borrowing needs of our members and to meet all current and future financial commitments. This objective is achieved by managing liquidity positions to maintain stable, reliable, and cost-effective sources of funds while taking into account market conditions, member demand, and the maturity profile of assets and liabilities. Our liquidity position complies with the FHLBank Act, Finance Agency regulations, and internal policies.
The FHLBank System's primary source of funds is the sale of Consolidated Obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of Consolidated Obligations at acceptable interest costs depends on the financial market's perception of the riskiness of the Obligations and on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, particularly the short-term
68

Table of Contents
capital markets. The System's favorable debt ratings, the implicit U.S. government backing of our debt, and our effective risk management practices are instrumental in ensuring stable and satisfactory access to the capital markets.

We believe our liquidity position, as well as that of the System, continued to be strong during 2019.2020, even in light of the temporary market disruptions earlier in the year caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our overall ability to effectively fund our operations through debt issuances remained sufficient. Investor demand for System debt was robust in 2019. Although we can make no assurances, we expect this2020, as investors preferred short-term, high-quality money market instruments amid the uncertainty in the financial markets due to continue to be the case.COVID-19 pandemic. We believe the possibility of a liquidity or funding crisis in the System that would impair our ability to participate, on a cost-effective basis, in issuances of debt, service outstanding debt, maintain adequate capitalization, or pay competitive dividends is remote.

The System works collectively to manage and monitor the System-wide liquidity and funding risks. Liquidity risk includes the risk that the System could have difficulty rolling over short-term Obligations when market conditions change, also called refinancing risk. The System has a large reliance on short-term funding; therefore, it has a sharp focus on managing liquidity risk to very low levels. As shown on the Statements of Cash Flows, in 2019,2020, our portion of the System's debt issuances totaled $823.2$275.3 billion for Discount Notes and $27.9$37.8 billion for Bonds. Access to short-term debt markets has been reliable because investors, driven by liquidity preferences and risk aversion, have sought the System’s short-term debt, which has resulted in strong demand for debt maturing in one year or less.

See the Notes to Financial Statements for more detailed information regarding maturities of certain financial assets and liabilities which are instrumental in determining the amount of liquidity risk. In addition to contractual maturities, other assumptions regarding cash flows such as estimated prepayments, embedded call optionality, and scheduled amortization are considered when managing liquidity risks.

Liquidity Management and Regulatory Requirements
We manage liquidity risk by ensuring compliance with our regulatory liquidity requirements and regularly monitoring other metrics.

In August 2018, theThe Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2018-07 Federal Home Loan Bank Liquidity Guidance (Liquidity AB). The Liquidity AB increasesestablishes the expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity without access to the capital markets for a specified number of days. The Liquidity AB rescindsdays, which was set as a period of between 10 to 30 calendar days in the 2009 liquidity guidance previously issued by the Finance Agency.base case. Under the new Liquidity AB, the calculation of liquidity is intended to provide additional assurance that we can continue to provide Advances

and Letters of Credit to members over an extended period without access to the capital markets. Under the new guidance,these expectations, all Advance maturities are assumed to renew, unless the Advances relate to former members who are ineligible to borrow new Advances.

As part The maintenance of the base case liquidity expectations, the Liquidity AB requires the FHLBanks to maintain sufficient liquidity foris intended to provide additional assurance that we can continue to provide Advances and Letters of Credit to members over an increasedextended period of between 10without access to 30 calendar days. Contemporaneously with the issuance of the Liquidity AB, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter that identifies initial thresholds for measures of liquidity.capital markets. As of December 31, 2019, we maintained a sufficient number of2020, our days of positive daily cash balances under the new guidance.were within these expectations.

The Liquidity ABFinance Agency also providedprovides guidance related to asset/liability maturity funding gap limits, which was implemented on December 31, 2018.limits. Funding gap metrics measure the difference between assets and liabilities that are scheduled to mature during a specified period of time and are expressed as a percentage of total assets. Although subject to change depending on conditions in the financial markets, the Liquidity AB provides guidance on maintaining appropriatecurrent regulatory requirement for funding gaps for three-month (-10is between -10 percent to -20 percent)percent for the three-month maturity horizon and one-year (-25is between -25 percent to -35 percent)percent for the one-year maturity horizons. The Finance Agency's supervisory letter set forth initial funding gap percentage limits.horizon. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we were operating within those limits.

We also meet operational and contingency liquidity requirements. We satisfy the operational liquidity requirement by both meeting a contingency liquidity requirement, discussed below, and because we are able to adequately access the capital markets to issue debt. In addition, we focus on maintaining an adequate liquidity balance and a funding balance between our financial assets and financial liabilities.

Contingency liquidity risk is the potential inability to meet liquidity needs because our access to the capital markets to issue Consolidated Obligations is restricted or suspended for a period of time due to a market disruption, operational failure, or real or perceived credit quality problems. We continued to hold an ample amount of liquidity reserves to protect against contingency liquidity risk. The following table presents the components of the contingency liquidity requirement.
(In millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Contingency Liquidity Requirement   
Total Contingency Liquidity Reserves (1)
$45,703
 $34,808
Total Requirement (2)
(26,182) (18,745)
Excess Contingency Liquidity Available$19,521
 $16,063

(1)Includes, among others, cash, overnight Federal funds, overnight deposits, self-liquidating term Federal funds, 95 percent of the market value of available-for-sale negotiable securities, and 75 percent of the market value of certain held-to-maturity obligations, including obligations of the United States, U.S. government agency obligations and MBS.

(2)Includes net liabilities maturing in the next seven business days, assets traded not yet settled, Advance commitments outstanding, Advances maturing in the next seven business days, and a three percent hypothetical increase in Advances.

To support our member deposits, we also must meet a statutory deposit reserve requirement. The sum of our investments in obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, and Advances with a final maturity not exceeding five years must equal or exceed the current amount of member deposits. The following table presents the components of this liquidity requirement.

(In millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Deposit Reserve Requirement
Total Eligible Deposit Reserves$37,185 $61,590 
Total Member Deposits(1,327)(942)
Excess Deposit Reserves$35,858 $60,648 
69

Table of Contents
(In millions)December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Deposit Reserve Requirement   
Total Eligible Deposit Reserves$61,590
 $66,643
Total Member Deposits(942) (664)
Excess Deposit Reserves$60,648
 $65,979


Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2019.2020. We believe that, as in the past, we will continue to have sufficient liquidity, including from access to the debt markets to issue Consolidated Obligations, to satisfy these obligations on a timely basis.
(In millions)< 1 year1 < 3 years3 < 5 years> 5 yearsTotal
Contractual Obligations     
Long-term debt (Bonds) - par (1)
$18,677 $6,117 $3,703 $3,454 $31,951 
Operating leases
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock12 19 
Commitments to fund mortgage loans137 — — — 137 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations43 55 
Total Contractual Obligations$18,830 $6,127 $3,712 $3,499 $32,168 
(1)Does not include Discount Notes and contractual interest payments related to Bonds. Total is based on contractual maturities; the actual timing of payments could be affected by factors affecting redemptions.
(In millions)< 1 year 1 < 3 years 3 < 5 years > 5 years Total
Contractual Obligations         
Long-term debt (Bonds) - par (1)
$18,260
 $11,318
 $4,664
 $4,139
 $38,381
Operating leases (include premises and equipment)1
 3
 2
 2
 8
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock15
 1
 5
 1
 22
Commitments to fund mortgage loans936
 
 
 
 936
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations3
 5
 4
 37
 49
Total Contractual Obligations$19,215
 $11,327
 $4,675
 $4,179
 $39,396

(1)Does not include Discount Notes and contractual interest payments related to Bonds. Total is based on contractual maturities; the actual timing of payments could be affected by factors affecting redemptions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table summarizes our off-balance sheet items at December 31, 2019.2020. For more information, see Note 2016 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(In millions)< 1 year1 < 3 years3 < 5 years> 5 yearsTotal
Off-balance sheet items (1)
     
Standby Letters of Credit$27,741 $984 $86 $$28,812 
Standby bond purchase agreements— 35 — — 35 
Consolidated Obligations traded, not yet settled322 — — — 322 
Total off-balance sheet items$28,063 $1,019 $86 $$29,169 
(1)Represents notional amount of off-balance sheet obligations.
(In millions)< 1 year 1 < 3 years 3 < 5 years > 5 years Total
Off-balance sheet items (1)
         
Standby Letters of Credit$15,143
 $993
 $68
 $1
 $16,205
Standby bond purchase agreements21
 55
 
 
 76
Total off-balance sheet items$15,164
 $1,048
 $68
 $1
 $16,281
(1)Represents notional amount of off-balance sheet obligations.

Member Concentration Risk

We regularly assess concentration risks from business activity. We believe that the concentration of Advance activity is consistent with our risk management philosophy, and the impact of borrower concentration on market risk, credit risk, and operational risk, after considering mitigating controls, is minimal.

Our business is designed to support significant changes in asset levels without having to undergo material changes in staffing, operations, risk practices, or general resource needs. A key reason for this scalability is that the Capital Plan provides for additional capital when Mission Assets grow and the opportunity for us to retire capital when Mission Assets decline, thereby acting, along with our efficient operating expenses, to preserve competitive profitability.
We believe the effect on credit risk exposure from borrower concentration is minimal because of our application of credit risk mitigations, the most important of which is over-collateralization of borrowings. In the remote possibility of failure of a member to whom we lent a large amount of Advances, combined with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's decision not to repay Advances, we would implement our member failure plan. Our member failure plan, which we test periodically, would liquidate collateral to recover losses from losing principal and interest on the Advance balances.

Advance concentration has a minimal effect on market risk exposure because Advances are largely funded by Consolidated Obligations and interest rate swaps that have similar interest rate characteristics. Furthermore, additional increases in Advance concentration would not materially affect capital adequacy because Advance growth is supported by new purchases of capital stock as required by the Capital Plan.

Operational Risks

Operational risk is defined as the risk of an unexpected loss resulting from human error, fraud, inability to enforce legal contracts, or deficiencies in internal controls or information systems. We mitigate operational risks through adherence to internal policies, conformance with entity level controls, and through an emphasis on the importance of risk management, as further discussed below. In addition, the Internal Audit Department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee of the Board

of Directors, regularly monitors and tests compliance with our policies, procedures and applicable regulatory requirements and best practices.requirements.

Internal Department Procedures and Controls
Each of our departments maintains and regularly reviews and enhances, as needed, a system of internal procedures and controls, including those that address proper segregation of duties. Each system is designed to prevent any one individual from
70

Table of Contents
processing the entirety of a transaction that affects member accounts, correspondent FHLB accounts or third-party servicers providing support to us. We review daily and periodic transaction activity reports in a timely manner to detect erroneous or fraudulent activity. Procedures and controls also are assessed on an enterprise-wide basis, independently from the business unit departments. We also are in compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Sections 302 and 404, which focus on the control environment over financial reporting.

Information Systems
We rely heavily upon internal and third-party information systems and other technology to conduct and manage our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Our computer systems, software and networks may be subjected to cyberattacks (e.g., breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events) that could jeopardize the confidentiality or integrity of such information, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations.
We mitigate the risk associated with cyberattacks through the implementation of multiple layers of security controls. Administrative, physical, and logical controls are in place for establishing, administering and actively monitoring system access, sensitive data, and system change. Additionally, separate groups within our organization and/or third parties validatetest the strength of our security controls and confirm that established policiesresponses, and procedures are adequately followed.recommend changes as needed to bolster resilience to security risks.
Disaster Recovery Provisions
We have a Business Resiliency Management Plan that provides us with the ability to maintain operations in various scenarios of business disruption. We review and update this plan periodically to ensure that it serves our changing operational needs and those of our members. WeIn case of business disruptions, we have an off-site facility in a suburb of Cincinnati, Ohio, which is kept ready for use and tested at least annually.annually, and employees are set up to work from home. We also have a back-up agreement in place with another FHLBank in the event that both of our Cincinnati-based facilities are inoperable.

Insurance Coverage
We have insurance coverage for cyber risks, employee fraud, forgery and wrongdoing, and Directors' and Officers' liability. This coverage primarily provides protection for claims alleging breach of duty, misappropriation of funds, neglect, acts of omission, employment practices, and fiduciary liability. We also have property, casualty, computer equipment, automobile, and various other types of other coverage as well.coverage.

Human Resources Policies and Procedures
The risks associated with our Human Resources function are categorized as either Employment Practices Risk or Human Capital Risk. Employment Practices Risk is the potential failure to properly administer our policies regarding employment practices and compensation and benefit programs for eligible staff and retirees, and the potential failure to observe and properly comply with federal, state and municipal laws and regulations. Human Capital Risk is the potential inability to attract and retain appropriate levels of qualified human resources to maintain efficient operations.

Comprehensive policies and procedures are in place to limit Employment Practices Risk. These are supported by an established internal control system that is routinely monitored and audited. With respect to Human Capital Risk, we strive to maintain a competitive salary and benefit structure, which is regularly reviewed and updated as appropriate to attract and retain qualified staff. In addition, we have a management succession plan that is reviewed and approved by our Board of Directors. See "Human Capital Resources" in Item 1. Business for further discussion.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Introduction

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities (if applicable), and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported periods. Although

management believes its judgments, estimates, and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ and other parties could arrive at different conclusions.

We have identified the following critical accounting policies that require management to make subjective or complex judgments about inherently uncertain matters. Our financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected under different conditions or different assumptions related to these accounting policies.
71

Table of Contents

Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activity

In accordance with Finance Agency regulations, we execute all derivatives to manage market risk exposure, not for speculation or solely for earnings enhancement. We record derivative instruments at their fair values on the Statements of Condition, and we record changes in these fair values in current period earnings. We strive to ensure that our use of derivatives maximizes the probability that they are highly effective in offsetting changes in the market values of the designated balance sheet instruments.

Fair Value Hedges
As indicated in the "Use of Derivatives in Market Risk Management" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management," we designate a portion of our derivatives as fair value hedges. Fair value hedge accounting permits the changes in fair values of the hedged risk in the hedged instruments to be recorded in the current period, thus offsetting partially or fully, the change in fair value of the derivatives. For derivatives accounted as fair value hedges, generally the hedged risk is designated to be changes in the eligible benchmark interest rate. The result is that there has been a relatively small amount of unrealized earnings volatility from hedging market risk with derivatives.

In order to determine if a derivative qualifies for fair value hedge accounting, we must assess how effective the derivative has been, and is expected to be, in hedging changes in the fair values of the risk being hedged. Each month we perform effectiveness testing using a consistently applied standard statistical methodology, regression analysis, which measures the degree of correlation and relationship between the changes in fair values of the derivative and hedged instrument. The results of the statistical measures must pass predefined threshold values to enable us to conclude that the changes in fair values of the derivative transaction have a close correlation with the changes in fair values of the hedged instrument. If any measure is outside of its respective tolerance, the hedge would no longer qualify for fair value hedge accounting. This means we must then record the fair value change of the derivative in current earnings without any offset in the fair value change of the related hedged instrument. Due to the intentional matching of terms between the derivative and the hedged instrument, we expect that failing an effectiveness test will be infrequent, which has been the case historically.

If a derivative/hedged instrument transaction fails effectiveness testing, it does not mean that the hedge relationship is no longer successful in achieving its intended economic purpose. For example, a Consolidated Obligation hedged with an interest rate swap creates adjustable-rate funding, which is used to match fund adjustable-rate and other short-term Advances. The hedge achieves the desired result (matching the net funding with the asset) because, economically, the Advance is part of the overall hedging strategy and the reason for engaging in the derivative transaction.

Each month, we compute fair values on all derivatives and related hedged instruments across a range of interest rate scenarios. For derivatives receiving long-haul fair value hedge accounting, the additional amount of earnings volatility under an assumption of stressed interest rate environments as of year-end 20192020 was in a range of positive $10negative $1 million to negative $6$8 million. This range is minimal compared to the notional principal amount.

Fair Value Option—Economic Hedge
We account for a portion of Advance and Bond-relatedConsolidated Obligation-related derivatives using an accounting election called "fair value option," which is included in the economic hedge category. An economic hedge under the fair value option does not require passing effectiveness testing to permit the derivative's fair market value to be offset with the market value of the hedged instrument, as is required under a fair value hedge. However, it records the fair market value of the hedged instrument at its full fair value instead of only the value related to the benchmark interest rate. The effect of electing full fair value is that the hedged instrument's market value includes the impact of changes in spreads between the designated benchmark interest rate and the interest rate index related to the hedged instrument, as well as other risk components, such as liquidity. Therefore, full fair value results in a different kind of unrealized earnings volatility, which could be higher or lower, compared to accounting under fair value hedge treatment.


Fair Values

We carry certain assets and liabilities on the Statement of Conditions at estimated fair value, including all derivatives, investments classified as available-for-sale and trading, and any financial instruments where we elected the fair value option. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Because our financial instruments generally do not have available quoted market prices, we determine fair values based on 1) our valuation models or 2) dealer indications, which may be based on the dealers' own valuation models and/or prices of similar instruments.

72

Table of Contents
Valuation models and their underlying assumptions are based on the best estimates of management with respect to discount rates, prepayments, market volatility, and other factors. These assumptions may have a significant effect on the reported fair values of assets and liabilities, and the income and expense related thereto. The use of different assumptions or changes in the models and assumptions, as well as changes in market conditions, could result in materially different net income and retained earnings.

We have control processes designed to ensure that fair value measurements are appropriate and reliable, that they are based on observable inputs wherever possible and that our valuation approaches and assumptions are reasonable and consistently applied. Where applicable, valuations are also compared to alternative external market data (e.g., quoted market prices, broker or dealer indications, pricing services and comparative analyses to similar instruments). For further discussion regarding how we measure financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, see Note 1915 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

We categorize each of our financial instruments carried at fair value into one of three levels in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy is based upon the transparency (observable or unobservable) of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources (Levels 1 and 2), while unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions of market variables (Level 3). Management utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Because items classified as Level 3 are valued using significant unobservable inputs, the process for determining the fair value of these items is generally more subjective and involves a high degree of management judgment and use of assumptions. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, all of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.


RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS

See Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and interpretations.



OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Income Statements (Quarter amounts are unaudited)

Summary income statements for each quarter within the last two years are provided in the tables below.
 2020
(In millions)
4th Quarter
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter
1st Quarter
Interest income$197 $239 $363 $447 
Interest expense116 146 214 365 
Net interest income81 93 149 82 
Non-interest income (loss)(15)(7)(15)31 
Non-interest expense26 29 35 33 
Net income$40 $57 $99 $80 
2019 2019
(In millions)
4th  Quarter
 
3rd  Quarter
 
2nd  Quarter
 
1st  Quarter
(In millions)
4th Quarter
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter
1st Quarter
Interest income$507
 $591
 $646
 $701
Interest income$507 $591 $646 $701 
Interest expense408
 504
 549
 579
Interest expense408 504 549 579 
Net interest income99
 87
 97
 122
Net interest income99 87 97 122 
Non-interest income (loss)6
 5
 (3) (18)Non-interest income (loss)(3)(18)
Non-interest expense29
 29
 30
 31
Non-interest expense29 29 30 31 
Net income$76
 $63
 $64
 $73
Net income$76 $63 $64 $73 
73

 2018
(In millions)
4th  Quarter
 
3rd  Quarter
 
2nd  Quarter
 
1st  Quarter
Interest income$665
 $598
 $594
 $524
Interest expense543
 468
 465
 406
Net interest income122
 130
 129
 118
Non-interest income (loss)(11) (9) (13) (4)
Non-interest expense31
 30
 31
 31
Net income$80
 $91
 $85
 $83
Table of Contents


Investments

Data on investments for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 are provided in the tables below.
(In millions)Carrying Value at December 31,
202020192018
Interest-bearing deposits$555 $550 $— 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,818 2,349 4,402 
Federal funds sold4,240 4,833 10,793 
Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations8,362 9,627 — 
GSE obligations2,126 1,988 224 
MBS:
U.S. obligation single-family MBS— — 
Total trading securities10,488 11,616 224 
Available-for-sale securities:
Certificates of deposit— 1,410 2,350 
GSE obligations142 132 53 
MBS:
GSE multi-family MBS150 — — 
Total available-for-sale securities292 1,542 2,403 
Held-to-maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations42 35 36 
MBS:   
U.S. obligation single-family MBS986 1,671 2,041 
GSE single-family MBS3,013 4,500 5,544 
GSE multi-family MBS5,607 7,293 8,171 
Total held-to-maturity securities9,648 13,499 15,792 
Total securities20,428 26,657 18,419 
Total investments$27,041 $34,389 $33,614 

74

(In millions)Carrying Value at December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Interest-bearing deposits$550
 $
 $
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,349
 4,402
 7,702
Federal funds sold4,833
 10,793
 3,650
Trading securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations9,627
 
 
GSE obligations1,988
 224
 
MBS:     
U.S. obligation single-family MBS1
 
 1
Total trading securities11,616
 224
 1
Available-for-sale securities:     
Certificates of deposit1,410
 2,350
 900
GSE obligations132
 53
 
Total available-for-sale securities1,542
 2,403
 900
Held-to-maturity securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations35
 36
 34
MBS:     
U.S. obligation single-family MBS1,671
 2,041
 2,484
GSE single-family MBS4,500
 5,544
 6,703
GSE multi-family MBS7,293
 8,171
 5,584
Total held-to-maturity securities13,499
 15,792
 14,805
Total securities26,657
 18,419
 15,706
Total investments$34,389
 $33,614
 $27,058
Table of Contents



As of December 31, 2019,2020, investments had the following maturity and yield characteristics.
(Dollars in millions)Due in one year or lessDue after one year through five yearsDue after five through 10 yearsDue after 10 yearsCarrying Value
Interest-bearing deposits$555 $— $— $— $555 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,818 — — — 1,818 
Federal funds sold4,240 — — — 4,240 
Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations2,205 6,157 — — 8,362 
GSE obligations— 162 1,674 290 2,126 
Total trading securities2,205 6,319 1,674 290 10,488 
Yield on trading securities1.95 %2.30 %2.59 %2.68 %
Available-for-sale securities:
GSE obligations$— $11 $117 $14 $142 
MBS(1):
GSE multi-family MBS— — 150 — 150 
Total available-for-sale securities— 11 267 14 292 
Yield on available-for sale securities— %3.28 %2.00 %3.09 %
Held-to-maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations$42 $— $— $— $42 
MBS(1):
U.S. obligation single-family MBS— — — 986 986 
GSE single-family MBS— 15 2,994 3,013 
GSE multi-family MBS— 1,041 4,392 174 5,607 
Total held-to-maturity securities42 1,056 4,396 4,154 9,648 
Yield on held-to-maturity securities0.15 %0.47 %0.62 %2.20 %
Total securities$2,247 $7,386 $6,337 $4,458 $20,428 
Total investments$8,860 $7,386 $6,337 $4,458 $27,041 
(Dollars in millions)Due in one year or lessDue after one year through five yearsDue after five through 10 yearsDue after 10 yearsCarrying Value
Interest-bearing deposits$550
$
$
$
$550
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,349



2,349
Federal funds sold4,833



4,833
Trading securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations1,396
8,231


9,627
GSE obligations
137
943
908
1,988
MBS(1):
     
U.S. obligation single-family MBS
1


1
Total trading securities1,396
8,369
943
908
11,616
Yield on trading securities1.82%2.21%2.67%2.53% 
Available-for-sale securities:     
Certificates of deposit$1,410
$
$
$
$1,410
GSE obligations

120
12
132
Total available-for-sale securities1,410

120
12
1,542
Yield on available-for sale securities1.99%%3.03%3.10% 
Held-to-maturity securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations$35
$
$
$
$35
MBS(1):
     
U.S. obligation single-family MBS266


1,405
1,671
GSE single-family MBS
14
16
4,470
4,500
GSE multi-family MBS
480
6,636
177
7,293
Total held-to-maturity securities301
494
6,652
6,052
13,499
Yield on held-to-maturity securities2.15%2.08%2.13%2.41% 
Total securities$3,107
$8,863
$7,715
$6,972
$26,657
Total investments$10,839
$8,863
$7,715
$6,972
$34,389
(1)MBS allocated based on contractual principal maturities assuming no prepayments.

(1)
MBS allocated based on contractual principal maturities assuming no prepayments.

As of December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB held securities of the following issuers with a carrying value greater than 10 percent of FHLB capital. The table includes GSEs, securities of the U.S. government, and government agencies and corporations, and privately issued certificatescorporations.
(In millions)TotalTotal
Name of IssuerCarrying ValueFair Value
United States Treasury$8,404 $8,404 
Fannie Mae6,291 6,352 
Freddie Mac3,988 4,030 
Government National Mortgage Association987 1,028 
Federal Farm Credit Banks660 660 
Other (1)
98 98 
Total investment securities$20,428 $20,572 
(1)     Includes issuers of deposit.securities that have a carrying value that is less than 10 percent of FHLB capital.

75

(In millions) Total Total
Name of Issuer Carrying Value Fair Value
United States Treasury $9,662
 $9,662
Fannie Mae 7,710
 7,710
Freddie Mac 5,504
 5,493
Government National Mortgage Association 1,405
 1,418
Federal Farm Credit Banks 610
 610
The Toronto-Dominion Bank 500
 500
Other (1)
 1,266
 1,266
Total investment securities $26,657
 $26,659
Table of Contents

(1)Includes issuers of securities that have a carrying value that is less than 10 percent of FHLB capital.


Loan Portfolio Analysis

The FHLB's outstanding loans, loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest, and allowance for credit loss information for the five years ended December 31 are shown below. The FHLB's interest and related shortfall on non-accrual loans and loans modified in troubled debt restructurings was not material during the years presented below.
(Dollars in millions)20202019201820172016
Domestic:     
Advances$25,362 $47,370 $54,822 $69,918 $69,882 
Real estate mortgages$9,549 $11,236 $10,502 $9,682 $9,150 
Real estate mortgages past due 90 days or more (including those in process of foreclosure) and still accruing interest, unpaid principal balance$64 $17 $19 $26 $33 
Non-accrual loans, unpaid principal balance (1)
$$$$$
Troubled debt restructurings, unpaid principal balance (not included above)$17 $12 $$$
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, beginning of year$$$$$
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change(1)— — — — 
Net charge-offs— — — — (1)
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, end of year$— $$$$
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period— %— %— %— %0.01 %
(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Domestic:         
Advances$47,370
 $54,822
 $69,918
 $69,882
 $73,292
Real estate mortgages$11,236
 $10,502
 $9,682
 $9,150
 $7,954
Real estate mortgages past due 90 days
   or more (including those in process of foreclosure)
   and still accruing interest, unpaid principal balance
$17
 $19
 $26
 $33
 $42
Non-accrual loans, unpaid principal balance (1)
$2
 $3
 $3
 $4
 $7
Troubled debt restructurings, unpaid principal balance (not included above)$12
 $9
 $9
 $8
 $8
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans,
   beginning of year
$1
 $1
 $1
 $2
 $5
Net charge-offs
 
 
 (1) (3)
Provision (reversal) for credit losses
 
 
 
 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans,
   end of year
$1
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $2
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
   average loans outstanding during the period
% % % 0.01% 0.04%
(1)    See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for an explanation of the FHLB's non-accrual policy.

(1)
See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for an explanation of the FHLB's non-accrual policy.

Other Borrowings

Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. The following is a summary of short-term borrowings exceeding 30 percent of total capital for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in millions)202020192018
Discount Notes 
Outstanding at year-end (book value)$27,500 $49,084 $46,944 
Weighted average rate at year-end (1) (2)
0.11 %1.56 %2.35 %
Daily average outstanding for the year (book value)$43,284 $44,482 $49,185 
Weighted average rate for the year (2)
0.68 %2.22 %1.86 %
Highest outstanding at any month-end (book value)$79,660 $62,567 $64,045 
Bonds (short-term)
Outstanding at year-end (principal amount)$11,676 $11,101 $14,728 
Weighted average rate at year-end (2) (3)
0.14 %1.60 %2.38 %
Daily average outstanding for the year (principal amount)$16,065 $15,595 $14,937 
Weighted average rate for the year (2) (3)
0.40 %2.27 %1.87 %
Highest outstanding at any month-end (principal amount)$23,649 $21,270 $19,438 
(1)     Represents an implied rate without consideration of concessions.
(2)     Amounts used to calculate weighted average rates for the year are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
(3)     Represents the effective coupon rate.

76

(Dollars in millions)2019 2018 2017
Discount Notes     
Outstanding at year-end (book value)$49,084
 $46,944
 $46,211
Weighted average rate at year-end (1) (2)
1.56% 2.35% 1.23%
Daily average outstanding for the year (book value)$44,482
 $49,185
 $43,124
Weighted average rate for the year (2)
2.22% 1.86% 0.89%
Highest outstanding at any month-end (book value)$62,567
 $64,045
 $51,762
Bonds (short-term)     
Outstanding at year-end (principal amount)$11,101
 $14,728
 $14,405
Weighted average rate at year-end (2) (3)
1.60% 2.38% 1.35%
Daily average outstanding for the year (principal amount)$15,595
 $14,937
 $10,359
Weighted average rate for the year (2) (3)
2.27% 1.87% 0.93%
Highest outstanding at any month-end (principal amount)$21,270
 $19,438
 $14,405
Table of Contents
(1)Represents an implied rate without consideration of concessions.
(2)Amounts used to calculate weighted average rates for the year are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon amounts in millions may not produce the same results.
(3)Represents the effective coupon rate.


Term Deposits

At December 31, 2019,2020, term deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more totaled $27,800,000.$123,675,000. The table below presents the maturities for term deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more:
(In millions)
By remaining maturity at December 31, 2019
3 months or less Over 3 months but within 6 months Over 6 months but within 12 months Over 12 months but within 24 months Total
Time certificates of deposit$13
 $1
 $2
 $12
 $28

(In millions)
By remaining maturity at December 31, 2020
3 months or lessOver 3 months but within 6 monthsOver 6 months but within 12 monthsOver 12 months but within 24 monthsTotal
Time certificates of deposit$65 $38 $19 $$124 
Ratios
 202020192018
Return on average assets0.31 %0.28 %0.32 %
Return on average equity5.78 5.65 6.29 
Average equity to average assets5.39 5.04 5.11 
Dividend payout ratio30.27 %74.06 %75.60 %
 2019 2018 2017
Return on average assets0.28% 0.32% 0.31%
Return on average equity5.65
 6.29
 6.15
Average equity to average assets5.04
 5.11
 5.00
Dividend payout ratio74.06% 75.60% 66.31%


Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information required under this Item is set forth in the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” caption at Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this filing.


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statements of condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the(the “FHLB”) as of December 31, 2019 2020and 2018, 2019,and the related statements of income, comprehensive income, capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020 including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).We also have audited the FHLB’sFHLB's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, thefinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the FHLB as of December 31, 2019 2020and 2018, 2019, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 2020in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the FHLB maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The FHLB’sFHLB's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the FHLB’sfinancial statements and on the FHLB’sFHLB's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the FHLB in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

77

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of thefinancial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of thefinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of thefinancial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

a2019pwcsignature.jpgCritical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation of Interest-Rate Derivatives and Hedged Items

As described in Notes 7 and 15 to the financial statements, the FHLB uses derivatives to manage interest-rate risk and reduce funding costs, among other risk management objectives. The total notional amount of derivatives as of December 31, 2020 was $26 billion, of which 40% were designated as hedging instruments, and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 was $216 million and $4 million, respectively. The fair values of interest-rate derivatives and hedged items are determined using the standard valuation technique of discounted cash flow analysis, which uses market-observable inputs, such as discount rate, forward interest rate, and volatility assumptions.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of interest-rate derivatives and hedged items is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in evaluating the discount rate, forward interest rate, and volatility assumptions used to fair value these derivatives and hedged items, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of interest-rate derivatives and hedged items, including controls over the method, data and assumptions. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent range of prices for a sample of interest rate derivatives and hedged items and comparison of management’s estimate to the independently developed ranges. Developing the independent range of prices involved testing the completeness
78

and accuracy of data provided by management and independently developing the discount rate, forward interest rate, and volatility assumptions.

fhlbcin-20201231_g1.jpg

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 19, 202018, 2021


We have served as the FHLB’s auditor since 1990.


79



FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(In thousands, except par value)December 31,(In thousands, except par value)December 31,
2019 2018 2020 2019
ASSETS   ASSETS   
Cash and due from banks (Note 3)$20,608
 $10,037
Cash and due from banks (Note 3)$2,984,073  $20,608 
Interest-bearing deposits550,160
 122
Interest-bearing deposits555,104  550,160 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,348,584
 4,402,208
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,818,268  2,348,584 
Federal funds sold4,833,000
 10,793,000
Federal funds sold4,240,000  4,833,000 
Investment securities:   
Trading securities (Note 4)11,615,693
 223,980
Available-for-sale securities (Note 5)1,542,185
 2,402,897
Held-to-maturity securities (includes $0 and $0 pledged as collateral at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, that may be repledged) (a) (Note 6)
13,499,319
 15,791,222
Investment securities: (Note 4)Investment securities: (Note 4)
Trading securitiesTrading securities10,488,124  11,615,693 
Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $286,869 and $1,541,815 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $286,869 and $1,541,815 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)291,587  1,542,185 
Held-to-maturity securities (includes $0 and $0 pledged as collateral at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, that may be repledged) (a)
Held-to-maturity securities (includes $0 and $0 pledged as collateral at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, that may be repledged) (a)
9,648,171  13,499,319 
Total investment securities26,657,197
 18,418,099
Total investment securities20,427,882 26,657,197 
Advances (includes $5,238 and $10,008 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) (Note 8)47,369,573
 54,822,252
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $711 and $840 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (Note 9 and Note 10)11,235,353
 10,500,917
Advances (includes $27,202 and $5,238 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) (Note 5)Advances (includes $27,202 and $5,238 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) (Note 5)25,362,003  47,369,573 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $248 and $711 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively (Note 6)Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $248 and $711 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively (Note 6)9,548,506  11,235,353 
Accrued interest receivable182,252
 169,982
Accrued interest receivable113,701  182,252 
Derivative assets (Note 11)267,165
 65,765
Other assets27,667
 20,191
Derivative assets (Note 7)Derivative assets (Note 7)215,888  267,165 
Other assets, netOther assets, net30,814  27,667 
TOTAL ASSETS$93,491,559
 $99,202,573
TOTAL ASSETS$65,296,239  $93,491,559 
LIABILITIES   LIABILITIES   
Deposits (Note 12)$951,296
 $669,016
Consolidated Obligations: (Note 13)   
Discount Notes (includes $12,386,974 and $0 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)49,084,219
 46,943,632
Bonds (includes $4,757,177 and $3,906,610 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)38,439,724
 45,659,138
Deposits (Note 8)Deposits (Note 8)$1,327,202  $951,296 
Consolidated Obligations: (Note 9)Consolidated Obligations: (Note 9) 
Discount Notes (includes $0 and $12,386,974 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)Discount Notes (includes $0 and $12,386,974 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)27,500,244  49,084,219 
Bonds (includes $2,262,388 and $4,757,177 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)Bonds (includes $2,262,388 and $4,757,177 at fair value under fair value option at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)31,996,311  38,439,724 
Total Consolidated Obligations87,523,943
 92,602,770
Total Consolidated Obligations59,496,555  87,523,943 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 15)21,669
 23,184
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 11)Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 11)19,454  21,669 
Accrued interest payable126,091
 147,337
Accrued interest payable77,521  126,091 
Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 14)115,295
 117,336
Derivative liabilities (Note 11)1,310
 4,586
Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 10)Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 10)110,772  115,295 
Derivative liabilities (Note 7)Derivative liabilities (Note 7)3,813  1,310 
Other liabilities307,499
 308,128
Other liabilities331,008  307,499 
Total liabilities89,047,103
 93,872,357
Total liabilities61,366,325  89,047,103 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

 

CAPITAL (Note 15)   
Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value); issued and outstanding shares: 33,664 shares at December 31, 2019 and 43,205 shares at December 31, 20183,366,428
 4,320,459
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)00
CAPITAL (Note 11)CAPITAL (Note 11) 
Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value); issued and outstanding shares: 26,409 shares at December 31, 2020 and 33,664 shares at December 31, 2019Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value); issued and outstanding shares: 26,409 shares at December 31, 2020 and 33,664 shares at December 31, 20192,640,863  3,366,428 
Retained earnings:   Retained earnings:
Unrestricted648,374
 631,971
Unrestricted802,715 648,374 
Restricted446,048
 390,829
Restricted501,321 446,048 
Total retained earnings1,094,422
 1,022,800
Total retained earnings1,304,036  1,094,422 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 16)(16,394) (13,043)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 12)Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 12)(14,985) (16,394)
Total capital4,444,456
 5,330,216
Total capital3,929,914  4,444,456 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL$93,491,559
 $99,202,573
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL$65,296,239  $93,491,559 
(a)
Fair values: $13,501,207
(a)Fair values: $9,792,136 and $13,501,207 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

$15,575,368 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

80

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017 2020 20192018
INTEREST INCOME:     INTEREST INCOME:   
Advances$1,195,128
 $1,407,702
 $903,620
Advances$434,815  $1,195,128 $1,407,702 
Prepayment fees on Advances, net8,421
 679
 1,351
Prepayment fees on Advances, net34,583  8,421 679 
Interest-bearing deposits13,453
 704
 181
Interest-bearing deposits4,467  13,453 704 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell64,336
 48,454
 23,340
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,124  64,336 48,454 
Federal funds sold228,761
 179,552
 70,287
Federal funds sold32,051  228,761 179,552 
Investment securities:     Investment securities:
Trading securities180,506
 1,535
 19
Trading securities263,847  180,506 1,535 
Available-for-sale securities27,691
 40,444
 6,228
Available-for-sale securities4,782  27,691 40,444 
Held-to-maturity securities386,526
 380,304
 306,204
Held-to-maturity securities186,363 386,526 380,304 
Total investment securities594,723
 422,283
 312,451
Total investment securities454,992 594,723 422,283 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio340,025
 321,328
 297,075
Mortgage loans held for portfolio275,600  340,025 321,328 
Loans to other FHLBanks70
 20
 
Loans to other FHLBanks60  70 20 
Total interest income2,444,917
 2,380,722
 1,608,305
Total interest income1,247,692  2,444,917 2,380,722 
INTEREST EXPENSE:     INTEREST EXPENSE:   
Consolidated Obligations:     Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes988,600
 915,032
 384,976
Discount Notes294,573  988,600 915,032 
Bonds1,033,508
 951,298
 786,922
Bonds541,996  1,033,508 951,298 
Total Consolidated Obligations2,022,108
 1,866,330
 1,171,898
Total Consolidated Obligations836,569 2,022,108 1,866,330 
Deposits15,861
 14,009
 4,738
Deposits3,525  15,861 14,009 
Loans from other FHLBanks3
 5
 10
Loans from other FHLBanks
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock1,113
 1,806
 2,514
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock1,068  1,113 1,806 
Other borrowings
 
 2
Total interest expense2,039,085
 1,882,150
 1,179,162
Total interest expense841,162  2,039,085 1,882,150 
NET INTEREST INCOME405,832
 498,572
 429,143
NET INTEREST INCOME406,530  405,832 498,572 
Provision for credit losses
 
 500
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES405,832
 498,572
 428,643
NON-INTEREST INCOME (LOSS):     NON-INTEREST INCOME (LOSS):   
Net gains (losses) on investment securities210,207
 7,086
 (6)Net gains (losses) on investment securities257,566 210,207 7,086 
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option(53,852) (14,184) 10,409
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option(7,293)(53,852)(14,184)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(177,912) (40,398) (24,464)Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities(273,253) (177,912)(40,398)
Standby Letters of Credit feesStandby Letters of Credit fees13,936 9,429 8,753 
Other, net11,338
 10,678
 12,824
Other, net1,976  1,909 1,925 
Total non-interest income (loss)(10,219) (36,818) (1,237)Total non-interest income (loss)(7,068) (10,219)(36,818)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:     NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:   
Compensation and benefits46,077
 46,317
 42,272
Compensation and benefits50,242  46,077 46,317 
Other operating expenses21,629
 20,019
 18,880
Other operating expenses20,901  21,629 20,019 
Finance Agency6,715
 6,389
 6,598
Finance Agency6,765  6,715 6,389 
Office of Finance4,930
 4,984
 4,484
Office of Finance5,119  4,930 4,984 
Other9,367
 7,010
 6,484
Other9,246  9,367 7,010 
Total non-interest expense88,718
 84,719
 78,718
Total non-interest expense92,273  88,718 84,719 
INCOME BEFORE ASSESSMENTS306,895
 377,035
 348,688
INCOME BEFORE ASSESSMENTS307,189  306,895 377,035 
Affordable Housing Program assessments30,801
 37,884
 35,120
Affordable Housing Program assessments30,826  30,801 37,884 
NET INCOME$276,094
 $339,151
 $313,568
NET INCOME$276,363  $276,094 $339,151 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

81

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income$276,363 $276,094 $339,151 
Other comprehensive income adjustments:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities4,348 480 14 
Pension and postretirement benefits(2,939)(3,831)3,603 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) adjustments1,409 (3,351)3,617 
Comprehensive income$277,772 $272,743 $342,768 
(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Net income$276,094
 $339,151
 $313,568
Other comprehensive income adjustments:     
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities480
 14
 (147)
Pension and postretirement benefits(3,831) 3,603
 (3,257)
Total other comprehensive income (loss) adjustments(3,351) 3,617
 (3,404)
Comprehensive income$272,743
 $342,768
 $310,164

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


82

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
(In thousands)Capital Stock
Class B - Putable
Retained EarningsAccumulated Other ComprehensiveTotal
 SharesPar ValueUnrestrictedRestrictedTotalLossCapital
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201742,411 $4,241,140 $617,034 $322,999 $940,033 $(16,660)$5,164,513 
Comprehensive income (loss)271,321 67,830 339,151 3,617 342,768 
Proceeds from sale of capital stock4,392 439,157 439,157 
Repurchase of capital stock(2,972)(297,252)(297,252)
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock(626)(62,586)(62,586)
Cash dividends on capital stock(256,384)(256,384)(256,384)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201843,205 4,320,459 631,971 390,829 1,022,800 (13,043)5,330,216 
Comprehensive income (loss)220,875 55,219 276,094 (3,351)272,743 
Proceeds from sale of capital stock5,918 591,762 591,762 
Repurchase of capital stock(15,386)(1,538,544)(1,538,544)
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock(73)(7,249)(7,249)
Cash dividends on capital stock(204,472)(204,472)(204,472)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201933,664 3,366,428 648,374 446,048 1,094,422 (16,394)4,444,456 
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change366 366 366 
Comprehensive income (loss)  221,090 55,273 276,363 1,409 277,772 
Proceeds from sale of capital stock21,351 2,135,091  2,135,091 
Repurchase of capital stock(23,000)(2,300,000)(2,300,000)
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock(5,606)(560,656) (560,656)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation16,533 16,533 16,533 
Cash dividends on capital stock  (83,648)(83,648) (83,648)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 202026,409 $2,640,863 $802,715 $501,321 $1,304,036 $(14,985)$3,929,914 
(In thousands)
Capital Stock
Class B - Putable
 Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Total
 Shares Par Value Unrestricted Restricted Total Loss Capital
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201641,569
 $4,156,944
 $574,122
 $260,285
 $834,407
 $(13,256) $4,978,095
Comprehensive income (loss)    250,854
 62,714
 313,568
 (3,404) 310,164
Proceeds from sale of capital stock3,547
 354,654
         354,654
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily
   redeemable capital stock
(2,705) (270,458)         (270,458)
Cash dividends on capital stock    (207,942)   (207,942)   (207,942)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201742,411
 4,241,140
 617,034
 322,999
 940,033
 (16,660) 5,164,513
Comprehensive income (loss)    271,321
 67,830
 339,151
 3,617
 342,768
Proceeds from sale of capital stock4,392
 439,157
         439,157
Repurchase of capital stock(2,972) (297,252)         (297,252)
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily
   redeemable capital stock
(626) (62,586)         (62,586)
Cash dividends on capital stock    (256,384)   (256,384)   (256,384)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201843,205
 4,320,459
 631,971
 390,829
 1,022,800
 (13,043) 5,330,216
Comprehensive income (loss) 
  
 220,875
 55,219
 276,094
 (3,351) 272,743
Proceeds from sale of capital stock5,918
 591,762
         591,762
Repurchase of capital stock(15,386) (1,538,544)         (1,538,544)
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily
   redeemable capital stock
(73) (7,249)         (7,249)
Cash dividends on capital stock    (204,472)   (204,472)   (204,472)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 201933,664
 $3,366,428
 $648,374
 $446,048
 $1,094,422
 $(16,394) $4,444,456

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

83


FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2020 20192018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:   
Net income$276,363  $276,094 $339,151 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization64,208  4,914 59,577 
Net change in derivative and hedging activities(123,345) (147,582)(4,706)
Net change in fair value adjustments on trading securities(257,566) (210,207)(7,086)
Net change in fair value adjustments on financial instruments held under fair value option7,293 53,852 14,184 
Other adjustments, net1,014  757 (10)
Net change in:  
Accrued interest receivable68,750  (12,408)(41,482)
Other assets(4,476) (1,517)1,651 
Accrued interest payable(54,159) (21,224)18,077 
Other liabilities16,062  19,520 25,792 
Total adjustments(282,219) (313,895)65,997 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(5,856) (37,801)405,148 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:   
Net change in:   
Interest-bearing deposits(87,411) (771,791)(7,089)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell530,316  2,053,624 3,299,721 
Federal funds sold593,000  5,960,000 (7,143,000)
Premises, software, and equipment(1,861) (2,460)(2,173)
Trading securities:   
Proceeds from maturities5,885,074  139 164 
Purchases(4,499,938)(11,181,646)(216,277)
Available-for-sale securities:   
Proceeds from maturities1,810,000  6,525,000 6,850,000 
Purchases(550,267)(5,673,500)(8,336,000)
Held-to-maturity securities:   
Proceeds from maturities3,919,706  3,561,188 2,917,912 
Purchases(75,604) (1,290,195)(4,065,023)
Advances:   
Repaid512,521,226  1,343,898,413 2,889,037,056 
Originated(490,263,028) (1,336,290,080)(2,873,930,828)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:   
Principal collected4,291,048  1,922,162 1,117,727 
Purchases(2,691,664) (2,691,654)(1,978,111)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities31,380,597  6,019,200 7,544,079 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
84

(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:     
Net income$276,094
 $339,151
 $313,568
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization4,914
 59,577
 57,973
Net change in derivative and hedging activities(147,582) (4,706) 6,927
Net change in fair value adjustments on trading securities(210,207) (7,086) 6
Net change in fair value adjustments on financial instruments held under fair value option53,852
 14,184
 (10,409)
Other adjustments757
 (10) 489
Net change in:     
Accrued interest receivable(12,408) (41,482) (18,701)
Other assets(1,517) 1,651
 23,686
Accrued interest payable(21,224) 18,077
 4,743
Other liabilities19,520
 25,792
 15,456
Total adjustments(313,895) 65,997
 80,170
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(37,801) 405,148
 393,738
      
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:     
Net change in:     
Interest-bearing deposits(771,791) (7,089) 46,981
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,053,624
 3,299,721
 (2,472,442)
Federal funds sold5,960,000
 (7,143,000) 607,000
Premises, software, and equipment(2,460) (2,173) (2,647)
Trading securities:     
Proceeds from maturities139
 164
 182
Purchases(11,181,646) (216,277) 
Available-for-sale securities:     
Proceeds from maturities6,525,000
 6,850,000
 2,350,000
Purchases(5,673,500) (8,336,000) (1,950,000)
Held-to-maturity securities:     
Proceeds from maturities3,561,188
 2,917,912
 2,484,142
Purchases(1,290,195) (4,065,023) (3,058,634)
Advances:     
Repaid1,343,898,413
 2,889,037,056
 2,366,633,884
Originated(1,336,290,080) (2,873,930,828) (2,366,705,248)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:     
Principal collected1,922,162
 1,117,727
 1,218,035
Purchases(2,691,654) (1,978,111) (1,788,156)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities6,019,200
 7,544,079
 (2,636,903)
      
      
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.    
      
      
(continued from previous page)
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
2020 20192018
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:   
Net change in deposits and pass-through reserves$371,585  $274,910 $28,225 
Net proceeds (payments) on derivative contracts with financing elements(10,764) (619)(1,107)
Net proceeds from issuance of Consolidated Obligations:   
Discount Notes275,314,658  823,242,543 552,603,900 
Bonds37,753,386  27,927,333 29,071,856 
Bonds transferred from other FHLBanks12,697 
Payments for maturing and retiring Consolidated Obligations:   
Discount Notes(296,851,576) (821,075,874)(551,919,437)
Bonds(44,193,670) (35,191,800)(37,565,265)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock2,135,091  591,762 439,157 
Payments for repurchase of capital stock(2,300,000)(1,538,544)(297,252)
Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(562,871) (8,764)(69,433)
Cash dividends paid(83,648) (204,472)(256,384)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation16,533 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(28,411,276) (5,970,828)(7,965,740)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks2,963,465  10,571 (16,513)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of the period20,608  10,037 26,550 
Cash and due from banks at end of the period$2,984,073  $20,608 $10,037 
Supplemental Disclosures:   
Interest paid$955,423  $2,116,628 $1,851,838 
Affordable Housing Program payments, net$35,349  $32,842 $30,425 


(continued from previous page)     
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(In thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
Net change in deposits and pass-through reserves$274,910
 $28,225
 $(99,633)
Net proceeds (payments) on derivative contracts with financing elements(619) (1,107) (4,210)
Net proceeds from issuance of Consolidated Obligations:     
Discount Notes823,242,543
 552,603,900
 449,775,543
Bonds27,927,333
 29,071,856
 27,080,080
Bonds transferred from other FHLBanks12,697
 
 
Payments for maturing and retiring Consolidated Obligations:     
Discount Notes(821,075,874) (551,919,437) (448,296,555)
Bonds(35,191,800) (37,565,265) (26,065,750)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock591,762
 439,157
 354,654
Payments for repurchase of capital stock(1,538,544) (297,252) 
Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(8,764) (69,433) (275,209)
Cash dividends paid(204,472) (256,384) (207,942)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(5,970,828) (7,965,740) 2,260,978
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks10,571
 (16,513) 17,813
Cash and due from banks at beginning of the period10,037
 26,550
 8,737
Cash and due from banks at end of the period$20,608
 $10,037
 $26,550
Supplemental Disclosures:     
Interest paid$2,116,628
 $1,851,838
 $1,157,662
Affordable Housing Program payments, net$32,842
 $30,425
 $30,126



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


85

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Background Information    

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the FHLB), a federally chartered corporation, is one of 11 District Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). The FHLBanks are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community development. The FHLB provides a readily available, competitively-priced source of funds to its member institutions. The FHLB is a cooperative whose member institutions own nearly all of the capital stock of the FHLB and may receive dividends on their investment to the extent declared by the FHLB's Board of Directors. Former members own the remaining capital stock to support business transactions still carried on the FHLB's Statements of Condition. Regulated financial depositories and insurance companies engaged in residential housing finance may apply for membership. Housing associates, including state and local housing authorities, may also borrow from the FHLB; while eligible to borrow, housing authorities are not members of the FHLB and, therefore, are not allowed to hold capital stock. A housing authority is eligible to utilize the Advance programs of the FHLB if it meets applicable statutory requirements. It must be a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development approved mortgagee and must also meet applicable mortgage lending, financial condition, as well as charter, inspection and supervision requirements.

All members must purchase stock in the FHLB. Members must own capital stock in the FHLB based on the amount of their total assets. Each member also may be required to purchase activity-based capital stock as it engages in certain business activities with the FHLB. As a result of these requirements, the FHLB conducts business with stockholders in the normal course of business. For financial statement purposes, the FHLB defines related parties as those members with more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the FHLB's outstanding capital stock. See Note 2218 for more information relating to transactions with stockholders.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) is the independent Federal regulator of the FHLBanks, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). The Finance Agency's stated mission is to ensure that the housing government-sponsored enterprises operate in a safe and sound manner so that they serve as a reliable source of liquidity and funding for housing finance and community investment.

Each FHLBank operates as a separate entity with its own management, employees, and board of directors. The FHLB does not have any special purpose entities or any other type of off-balance sheet conduits.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of the debt instruments of the FHLBanks, known as Consolidated Obligations, and to prepare combined quarterly and annual financial reports of all FHLBanks. As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (the FHLBank Act), or by Finance Agency regulation, the FHLBanks' Consolidated Obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks and are the primary source of funds for the FHLBanks. Deposits, other borrowings, and capital stock issued to members provide other funds. The FHLB primarily uses its funds to provide Advances to members and to purchase loans from members through its Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP). The FHLB also provides member institutions with correspondent services, such as wire transfer, security safekeeping, and settlement services.


Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The FHLB's accounting and financial reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

Significant Accounting Policies

Beginning January 1, 2020, the FHLB adopted new accounting guidance related to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments (the CECL accounting guidance), which requires a financial asset or group of financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new guidance also requires credit losses relating to these financial instruments and available-for-sale securities to be recorded through the allowance for credit losses. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the FHLB recorded an immaterial cumulative adjustment to the opening
86

balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2020, and the prior periods were not revised to conform to the new basis of accounting. Key changes from prior accounting guidance are detailed below.

Cash Flows. In the Statements of Cash Flows, the FHLB considers non-interest bearing cash and due from banks as cash and cash equivalents. Federal funds sold are not treated as cash equivalents for purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, but are instead treated as short-term investments and are reflected in the investing activities section of the Statements of Cash Flows.


Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the 2018 and 2017 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation as of December 31, 2019. Specifically, certain cash flow amounts in the prior period Statement of Cash Flows have been reclassified to reflect short-term investment securities purchases and proceeds on a gross, rather than net, basis.

Subsequent Events. The FHLB has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure through the issuance of these financial statements and believes there have been no material subsequent events requiring additional disclosure or recognition in these financial statements.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make subjective assumptions and estimates. These assumptions and estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Fair Values. Some of the FHLB's financial instruments lack an available trading market with prices characterized as those that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Therefore, the FHLB uses pricing services and/or internal models employing significant estimates and present value calculations when disclosing fair values. See Note 1915 for more information.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold. These investments provide short-term liquidity and are carried at cost.amortized cost; however, accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statement of Condition. Interest-bearing deposits include certificates of deposits (CDs) not meeting the definition of an investment security. The FHLB treats securities purchased under agreements to resell as short-term collateralized loans. Federal funds sold are unsecured loans that are generally transacted on an overnight term.

Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses if they are not expected to be repaid according to the relevant contractual terms. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses.The FHLB applies the collateral maintenance provision practical expedient, which are classified as assetsallows expected credit losses to be measured based on the Statements of Condition. Ifdifference between the marketfair value of the underlyingcollateral and the investment's amortized cost, for securities decrease belowpurchased under agreements to resell. The credit loss would be limited to the marketdifference between the fair value required asof the collateral and the investment’s amortized cost.

Prior to January 1, 2020, securities purchased under agreements to resell were evaluated for credit losses if there was a collateral shortfall which the FHLB did not believe the counterparty haswould replenish in accordance with the option to (1) place an equivalent amount of additional securities in safekeeping in the name of the FHLB or (2) remit an equivalent amount of cash. Federal funds sold consist of short-term, unsecured loans generally transacted with counterparties that are considered by the FHLB to be of investment quality.relevant contractual terms.


InvestmentDebt Securities. The FHLB classifies investment securities as trading, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at the date of acquisition. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis.

Trading. Securities classified as trading are acquired for liquidity purposes and asset/liability management and carried at fair value. The FHLB records changes in the fair value of these securities through othernon-interest income (loss) as a net gain or loss on trading securities. However,Finance Agency regulations and the FHLB does not participate inFHLB's risk management policies prohibit the speculative trading practicesof these instruments and holds these investments indefinitely as management periodically evaluates its liquidity needs.limit credit risk arising from them.

Available-for-Sale. Securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Generally, theThe change in fair value of available-for-sale securities is recorded in other comprehensive income as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities. Beginning January 1, 2019, the FHLB adopted new hedge accounting guidance, which, among other things, impacts the income statement presentation of gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges, including hedges on available-for-sale securities. For available-for-sale securities that have been hedged and qualify as a fair value hedge, the FHLB records the portion of the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in interest income on available-for-sale securities together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative, and records the remainder of the change in the fair value of the investment in other comprehensive income as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.

87

Prior to January 1, 2019, for available-for-sale securities that had been hedged and qualified as a fair value hedge, the FHLB recorded the portion of the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in non-interest income (loss) as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative, and recorded the remainder of the change in the fair value of the investment in other comprehensive income as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.

Additionally, beginning January 1, 2020, the FHLB adopted the CECL accounting guidance.For securities classified as available-for-sale, the FHLB evaluates an individual security for impairment on a quarterly basis by comparing the security’s fair value to its amortized cost. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. Impairment exists when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position). In assessing whether a credit loss exists on an impaired security, the FHLB considers whether there would be a shortfall in receiving all cash flows contractually due. When a shortfall is considered possible, the FHLB compares the present value of cash flows to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows is less than amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the unrealized loss. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.

If management intends to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before expected recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is written off and the amortized cost basis is written down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings as net gains (losses) on investment securities. If management does not intend to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale and it is not more likely than not that management will be required to sell the debt security, then the credit portion of the difference is recognized as an allowance for credit losses and any remaining difference between the security’s fair value and amortized cost is recorded to net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities within other comprehensive income (loss).

Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the available-for-sale security carrying value. As of December 31, 2019, the FHLB had not recorded any direct write-downs to the carrying value of its available-for-sale securities.

Held-to-Maturity. Securities that the FHLB has both the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost, representing the amount at which an investment is acquired adjusted fororiginal cost net of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition.

Certain changes in circumstances may cause the FHLB to change its intent to hold a security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. Thus, the sale or transfer of a held-to-maturity security due to certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness or changes in regulatory requirements, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. Other events that are isolated,

nonrecurring, and unusual for the FHLB that could not have been reasonably anticipated may cause the FHLB to sell or transfer a held-to-maturity security without necessarily calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity.

In addition, sales of held-to-maturity debt securities that meet either of the following two conditions may be considered as maturities for purposes of the classification of securities: (1) the sale occurs near enough to the security's maturity date (for example, within three months of maturity), or call date if exercise of the call is probable, that interest rate risk is substantially eliminated as a pricing factor and changes in market interest rates would not have a significant effect on the security's fair value, or (2) the sale of the security occurs after the FHLB has already collected a substantial portion (at least 85 percent) of the principal outstanding at acquisition due either to prepayments on the security or to scheduled payments on the security payable in equal installments (both principal and interest) over its term.

Beginning January 1, 2020, the FHLB adopted the CECL accounting guidance. Held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. An allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the held-to-maturity security carrying value. As of December 31, 2019, the FHLB had not recorded any direct write-downs to the carrying value of its held-to-maturity securities.

88

Premiums and Discounts. The FHLB amortizes purchased premiums and accretes purchased discounts on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity using the retrospective interest method (retrospective method). The retrospective method requires that the FHLB estimate prepayments over the estimated life of the securities and make a retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time that the FHLB changes the estimated life as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the securities. The FHLB uses nationally recognized third-party prepayment models to project estimated cash flows. Due to their short term nature, the FHLB amortizes premiums and accretes discounts on other investment categories with a term of one year or less using a straight-line methodology based on the contractual maturity of the securities. Analyses of the straight-line compared to the interest, or level-yield, methodology have been performed by the FHLB, and it has determined that the impact of the difference on the financial statements for each period reported, taken individually and as a whole, is not material.

Gains and Losses on Sales. The FHLB computes gains and losses on sales of investment securities using the specific identification method and includes these gains and losses in other income.

InvestmentDebt Securities - Other-than-Temporary Impairment. TheBeginning January 1, 2020, the FHLB evaluatesadopted the CECL accounting guidance. As a result, the accounting guidance related to other-than-temporary impairment accounting for investments was superseded as of that date.

Prior to January 1, 2020, the FHLB evaluated its individual available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. A security iswas considered impaired when its fair value iswas less than its amortized cost. The FHLB considersconsidered an other-than-temporary impairment to have occurred under any of the following conditions:


if the FHLB has an intent to sell the impaired debt security;
if, based on available evidence, the FHLB believes it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the impaired debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis; or
if the FHLB does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security.

if the FHLB had an intent to sell the impaired debt security;
Recognitionif, based on available evidence, the FHLB believed it was more likely than not that it would be required to sell the impaired debt security before the recovery of Other-than-Temporary Impairment.its amortized cost basis; or
if the FHLB did not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security.

If either of the first two conditions above iswas met, the FHLB recognizeswould have recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security's amortized cost basis and its fair value as of the Statement of Condition date. For securities in an unrealized loss position that dodid not meet either of the first two conditions, the entire loss position, or total other-than-temporary impairment, iswas evaluated to determine the extent and amount of credit loss.

Advances. The FHLB reportsrecords Advances (loans to members, former members or housing associates) either at amortized cost or at fair value when the fair value option ishas been elected. Advances carriedrecorded at amortized cost are reportedcarried at original cost net of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts (including discounts on Advances related to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP), as discussed below)Program), unearned commitment fees, and hedgingfair value hedge adjustments. The FHLB amortizes or accretes premiums and discounts, and recognizes unearned commitment fees and hedging adjustments on Advances to interest income using a level-yield methodology. Refundable fees are deferred untilFor Advances recorded at amortized cost, accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the commitment expires or untilStatements of Condition.

Beginning January 1, 2020, the Advance is made.FHLB adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The FHLB records interest on Advances to income as earned. For Advances carried at fair value, interest incomeamortized cost are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for credit losses is recognized based onrecorded with a corresponding adjustment to the contractual interest rate.provision (reversal) for credit losses. Prior to January 1, 2020, the FHLB evaluated Advances to determine if an allowance for credit losses was necessary if it was probable an impairment occurred in the FHLB’s Advance portfolio as of the Statement of Condition date and the amount of loss could be reasonably estimated.

Advance Modifications. In cases in which the FHLB funds a new Advance concurrent with or within a short period of time before or after the prepayment of an existing Advance by the same borrower, the FHLB evaluates whether the new Advance meets the accounting criteria to qualify as a modification of an existing Advance or whether it constitutes a new Advance. The FHLB compares the present value of cash flows on the new Advance to the present value of cash flows remaining on the existing Advance. If there is at least a 10 percent difference in the cash flows, or if the FHLB concludes the differences between the Advances are more than minor based on qualitative factors, the Advance is accounted for as a new Advance. In all other instances, the new Advance is accounted for as a modification.


Prepayment Fees. The FHLB charges a borrower a prepayment fee when the borrower prepays certain Advances before the original maturity. The recognition of prepayment fees is dependent on whether a new Advance was funded. If there were no new Advances funded, the FHLB records prepayment fees, net of basis adjustments related to hedging activities included in the
89

carrying value of the Advances, as “Prepayment fees on Advances, net” in the interest income section of the Statements of Income.

If a new Advance was funded, but does not qualify as a modification of a prepaid Advance, the prepaid Advance is treated as an Advance termination with subsequent funding of a new Advance and the fees on the prepaid Advance, net of related hedging adjustments, are recorded in interest income as “Prepayment fees on Advances, net.”

If a new Advance is funded and qualifies as a modification of the original Advance, the net prepayment fee is deferred, recorded in the basis of the modified Advance, and amortized/accreted using a level-yield methodology over the life of the modified Advance to Advance interest income. If the modified Advance is hedged and meets the hedge accounting requirements, the associated fair value gains or losses of the Advance and the prepayment fees are included in the basis of the modified Advance. Such gains or losses and prepayment fees are then amortized in interest income over the life of the modified Advance using a level-yield methodology.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. The FHLB classifies mortgageMortgage loans as held for portfolio and, accordingly, reports themare recorded at their principal amount outstandingamortized cost, which is original cost, net of unamortizedperiodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and hedging basis adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments.commitments, and direct write-downs. The FHLB has the intent and ability to hold these mortgage loans to maturity. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. An allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The FHLB does not purchase mortgage loans with credit deterioration present at the time of purchase.

Beginning January 1, 2020, the FHLB adopted the CECL accounting guidance. The FHLB performs a quarterly assessment of its mortgage loans held for portfolio to estimate expected credit losses. The FHLB measures expected credit losses on mortgage loans on a collective basis, pooling loans with similar risk characteristics. If a mortgage loan no longer shares risk characteristics with other loans, it is removed from the pool and evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis.

When developing the allowance for credit losses, the FHLB measures the expected loss over the estimated remaining life of a mortgage loan, which also considers how the FHLB’s credit enhancements mitigate credit losses. If a loan is purchased at a discount, the discount does not offset the allowance for credit losses. The FHLB includes estimates of expected recoveries within the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, as the FHLB writes off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income if a mortgage loan is placed on non-accrual status.

Prior to January 1, 2020, the FHLB recorded an allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans if it was probable an impairment occurred in the FHLB’s mortgage loans held for portfolio as of the Statement of Condition date and the amount of loss could be reasonably estimated. A loan was considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it was probable that an FHLB would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Premiums and Discounts. The FHLB defers and amortizes premiums and accretes discounts paid to and received by the FHLB's participating members (Participating Financial Institutions, or PFIs) and hedging basis adjustments, as interest income using the contractual interest method (contractual method).

Other Fees. The FHLB may receive non-origination fees, called pair-off fees. Pair-off fees represent a make-whole provision and are assessed when a member fails to deliver the quantity of loans committed to in a Mandatory Delivery Contract. Pair-off fees are recorded in other income.non-interest income (loss). A Mandatory Delivery Contract is a legal commitment the FHLB makes to purchase, and a PFI makes to deliver, a specified dollar amount of mortgage loans, with a forward settlement date, at a specified range of mortgage note rates and prices.

Allowance for Credit Losses.An allowance for credit losses is separately established for each identified portfolio segment, if it is probable that a loss triggering event has occurred in the FHLB's portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the FHLB will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. To the extent necessary, an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded as a liability. See Note 10 for details on each allowance methodology.

Portfolio Segments. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology for determining its allowance for credit losses. The FHLB has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses, where applicable, for (1) credit products (Advances, Letters of Credit and other extensions of credit to members) (2) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage loans held for portfolio; and (3) conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.

Classes of Financing Receivables. Classes of financing receivables generally are a disaggregation of a portfolio segment to the extent needed to understand the exposure to credit risk arising from these financing receivables. The FHLB determined that no further disaggregation of the portfolio segments identified above is needed as the credit risk arising from these financing receivables is assessed and measured by the FHLB at the portfolio segment level.

Collateral-dependent Loans. An impaired loan is considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property; that is, there is no other available and reliable source of repayment. A loan that is considered collateral-dependent is measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs, with any shortfall recognized as an allowance for loan loss or charged-off. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as non-accrual loans noted below.

Non-accrual Loans. The FHLB places a conventional mortgage loan on non-accrual status if it is determined that either (1) the collection of interest or principal is doubtful (e.g., when a related allowance for credit lossescharge-off is recorded on a loan considered to be a troubled debt restructuring as a result of the individual evaluation for impairment)loan), or (2) interest or principal is past due for 90 days or more, except when the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection (e.g., through credit enhancements

90

enhancements and with monthly remittances on a schedule/scheduled basis). Past due loans are those where the borrower has failed to make a full payment of principal and interest within one month of its due date. Loans with remittances on a schedule/scheduled basis means the FHLB receives monthly principal and interest payments from the servicer regardless of whether the mortgagee is making payments to the servicer. Loans with monthly remittances on an actual/actual basis are considered well-secured; however, servicers of actual/actual loanremittance types contractually do not advance principal and interest regardless of borrower creditworthiness. As a result, these loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become 90 days delinquent.

For those mortgage loans placed on non-accrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The FHLB records cash payments received on non-accrual loans first as interest income and then as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement, unless the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful. If the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful, cash payments received are applied first solely to principal until the remaining principal amount due is expected to be collected and then as a recovery of any charge-off, if applicable, followed by recording interest income. A loan on non-accrual status may be restored to accrual status when (1) none of its contractual principal and interest is due and unpaid, and the FHLB expects repayment of the remaining contractual interest and principal, or (2) it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection.

Charge-off Policy. A charge-off is recorded if it is estimated that the recorded investmentamortized cost and any applicable accrued interest in a loan will not be recovered. The FHLB evaluates whether to record a charge-off on a conventional mortgage loan upon the occurrence of a confirming event, such as notification of a claim against any of the credit enhancements. The FHLB also charges off the portion of outstanding conventional mortgage loan balances in excess of fair value of the underlying property, less cost to sell and adjusted for any available credit enhancements, for loans that are 180 days or more delinquent and/or certain loans thatwhere the borrower has filed for bankruptcy.

Premises, Software and Equipment, Net. Premises, software and equipment are included in other assets on the Statements of Condition. The FHLB records premises, software and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The FHLB computes depreciation on a straight-line methodology over the estimated useful lives of assets ranging from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease. The FHLB capitalizes improvements and major renewals but expenses ordinary maintenance and repairs when incurred. The FHLB capitalizes and amortizes the cost of computer software developed or obtained for internal use over future periods. In addition, the FHLB includes gains and losses on the disposal of premises, software and equipment in other non-interest income (loss) in the Statements of Income.

Premises, software and equipment were $8,399,000$7,905,000 and $8,190,000,$8,399,000, which was net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $31,106,000$33,439,000 and $29,007,000$31,106,000 as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, the depreciation and amortization expense for premises, software and equipment was $2,367,000, $2,257,000, $2,889,000, and $2,949,000,$2,889,000, respectively.

Leases. The FHLB leases office space and office equipment to run its business operations. Beginning January 1, 2019, the FHLB adopted new lease accounting guidance. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the FHLB included in the Statement of Condition $4,980,000 and $5,816,000 of operating lease right-of-use assets in other assets, as well asnet, and $5,500,000 and $6,417,000 of operating lease liabilities in other liabilities. The FHLB recognized operating lease costs in the other operating expenses line of the Statement of Income of $1,832,000 and $1,842,000 for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities. All derivatives are recognized on the Statements of Condition at their fair values and are reported as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities, net of cash collateral, and accrued interest from counterparties. The fair values of derivatives are netted by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset and, if negative, they are classified as a liability. Cash flows associated with derivativesa derivative are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the Statement of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be a financing derivative.

The FHLB utilizes two Derivative Clearing Organizations (Clearinghouses), for all cleared derivative transactions, LCH Ltd. and CME Clearing. At both Clearinghouses, variation margin is characterized as daily settlement payments and initial margin is considered cash collateral.

Derivative Designations. Each derivative is designated as one of the following:

1.a qualifying hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment (a "fair value" hedge); or
a.a qualifying hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment (a "fair value" hedge); or

2.a non-qualifying hedge (“economic hedge”) for asset/liability management purposes.

91

b.a non-qualifying hedge (“economic hedge”) for asset/liability management purposes.

Accounting for Fair Value Hedges. If hedging relationships meet certain criteria including, but not limited to, formal documentation of the hedging relationship and an expectation to be highly effective, they are eligible for fair value hedge accounting and the offsetting changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk may be recorded in earnings. The application of fair value hedge accounting generally requires the FHLB to evaluate the effectiveness of the hedging relationships at inception and on an ongoing basis and to calculate the changes in fair value of the derivatives and related hedged items independently. This is known as the “long-haul” method of accounting. Transactions that meet more stringent criteria qualify for the “shortcut” method of hedge accounting in which an assumption can be made that the change in fair value of a hedged item exactly offsets the change in value of the related derivative.

Derivatives are typically executed at the same time as the hedged item, and the FHLB designates the hedged item in a qualifying hedge relationship as of the trade date. In many hedging relationships, the FHLB may designate the hedging relationship upon its commitment to disburse an Advance, trade a Consolidated Obligation or purchase an investment security in which settlement occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. The FHLB records the changes in fair value of the derivative and the hedged item beginning on the trade date.

Beginning January 1, 2019, the FHLB adopted new hedge accounting guidance, which, among other things, impacts the presentation of gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated and qualifies as a fair value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item.

Prior to January 1, 2019, changes in the fair value of a derivative that was designated and qualified as a fair value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that were attributable to the hedged risk, were recorded in non-interest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities.”

Accounting for Economic Hedges. An economic hedge is defined as a derivative hedging specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities, or firm commitments that does not qualify, or was not designated, for hedge accounting, but is an acceptable hedging strategy under the FHLB's risk management program. These economic hedging strategies also comply with Finance Agency regulatory requirements prohibiting speculative hedge transactions. An economic hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability caused by the changes in fair value of the derivatives that are recorded in the FHLB's income but that are not offset by corresponding changes in the value of the economically hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments. As a result, theThe FHLB recognizes the net interest and the change in fair value of these derivatives in non-interest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities” with no offsetting fair value adjustments for the assets, liabilities, or firm commitments.activities.”

Accrued Interest Receivables and Payables.The difference between accruals of interest receivables and payables on derivatives that are designated as fair value hedge relationships is recognized as adjustments to the interest income or expense of the designated hedged item. The difference between accruals of interest receivables and payables on economic hedges are recognized in non-interest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities.”

Discontinuance of Hedge Accounting. The FHLB discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of a hedged item attributable to the hedged risk; (2) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; or (3) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the FHLB determines that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair value hedge of an existing hedged item, the FHLB continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, ceases to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value, and amortizes the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item using a level-yield methodology.

Embedded Derivatives. The FHLB may issue debt, make Advances, or purchase financial instruments in which a derivative instrument is “embedded.” Upon execution of these transactions, the FHLB assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the debt, Advance, debt, or purchased financial instrument (the host contract) and whether a separate, non-embedded instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When the FHLB determines that (1) the embedded derivative has economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract and (2) a separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and designated as a stand-alone derivative

92

instrument pursuant to an economic hedge. However, the entire contract is carried at fair value and no portion of the contract is designated as a hedging instrument if the entire contract (the host contract and the embedded derivative) is to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in current-period earnings (such as an investment security classified as “trading” as well as hybrid financial instruments that are selected for which the fair value option)option is elected), or if the FHLB cannot reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative for purposes of separating that derivative from its host contract.

Consolidated Obligations. Consolidated Obligations are recorded at amortized cost unless the FHLB has elected the fair value option, in which case the Consolidated Obligations are carried at fair value.

Concessions. Dealers receive concessions in connection with the issuance of certain Consolidated Obligations. The Office of Finance prorates the amount of the concession to the FHLB based upon the percentage of the debt issued that is assumed by the FHLB. Concessions paid on Consolidated Obligations designated under the fair value option are expensed as incurred in other non-interest expense. The FHLB records concessions paid on Consolidated Obligation Bonds not designated under the fair value option as a direct deduction from their carrying amounts, consistent with the presentation of discounts on Consolidated Obligations. The concessions are amortized, using a level-yield methodology, over the terms to maturity or the expected lives of the Consolidated Obligation Bonds. The amortization of those concessions is included in Consolidated Obligation Bond interest expense.

The FHLB charges to expense as incurred the concessions applicable to Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes because of the short maturities of these Notes. Analyses of expensing concessions as incurred compared to a level-yield methodology have been performed by the FHLB, and it has determined that the impact of the difference on the financial statements for each period reported, taken individually and as a whole, is not material.

Discounts and Premiums. The FHLB accretes the discounts and amortizes the premiums on Consolidated Obligation Bonds to interest expense using a level-yield methodology over the terms to maturity or estimated lives of the corresponding Consolidated Obligation Bonds. Due to their short-term nature, the FHLB expenses the discounts on Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes using a straight-line methodology over the term of the Discount Notes. Analyses of a straight-line compared to a level-yield methodology have been performed by the FHLB, and the FHLB has determined that the impact of the difference on the financial statements for each period reported, taken individually and as a whole, is not material.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. The FHLB evaluates its off-balance sheet credit exposures on a quarterly basis for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for expected credit losses on these off-balance sheet exposures is recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The FHLB reclassifies stock subject to redemption from equity to liability upon expiration of the “grace period” after a member provides written notice of redemption, gives notice of intent to withdraw from membership, or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or involuntary termination from membership, because the member's shares then meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reflected as interest expense in the Statements of Income. The repurchase or redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock is reflected as a cash outflow in the financing activities section of the Statements of Cash Flows.

If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the FHLB reclassifies the mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to equity. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

Restricted Retained Earnings. Under theThe Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended (Capital Agreement), provides that the FHLB contributeswill, on a quarterly basis, allocate 20 percent of its quarterly net income to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account,balance calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of the FHLB's average balance of outstanding Consolidated Obligations for the previouscalendar quarter. These restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends and are presented separately on the Statements of Condition.

Standby Letters of Credit. The FHLB records commitment fees for Standby Letters of Credit as deferred income when it receives the fees and accretes them using a straight-line methodology over the term of the Standby Letter of Credit. Based upon past experience, the FHLB's management believes that the likelihood of Standby Letters of Credit being drawn upon is remote.

Finance Agency Expenses. The FHLB funds its proportionate share of the costs of operating the Finance Agency. The portion of the Finance Agency's expenses and working capital fund paid by each FHLBank has been allocated based on each
93

FHLBank's pro rata share of total annual assessments (which are based on the ratio between each FHLBank's minimum required regulatory capital and the aggregate minimum required regulatory capital of every FHLBank).


Office of Finance Expenses. The FHLB is assessed for its proportionate share of the costs of operating the Office of Finance. Each FHLBank's proportionate share of Office of Finance operating and capital expenditures is calculated using a formula that is based upon the following components: (1) two-thirds based upon each FHLBank's share of total Consolidated Obligations outstanding and (2) one-third based upon an equal pro rata allocation.

Voluntary Housing Programs. The FHLB classifies amounts awarded under its voluntary housing programs as other non-interest expenses.

Affordable Housing Program (AHP). Assessments. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. The FHLB charges the required funding for AHP to earnings and establishes a liability. The AHP funds provide subsidies to members to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. The FHLB also issues AHP Advances at interest rates below the customary interest rate for non-subsidized Advances. When the FHLB makes an AHP Advance, the present value of the variation in the cash flow caused by the difference in the interest rate between the AHP Advance rate and the FHLB's related cost of funds for comparable maturity funding is charged against the AHP liability and recorded as a discount on the AHP Advance. As an alternative, the FHLB also has the authority to make the AHP subsidy available to members as a grant. The discount on AHP Advances is accreted to interest income on Advances using a level-yield methodology over the life of the Advance.



Note 2 - Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards and InterpretationsGuidance

Troubled Debt Restructuring Relief. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act providing optional, temporary relief from accounting for certain loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) was signed into law. Under the CARES Act, TDR relief is available to banks for loan modifications related to the adverse effects of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) granted to borrowers that were current as of December 31, 2019. TDR relief, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, applies to COVID-19 related modifications made from March 1, 2020, until the earlier of January 1, 2022, or 60 days following the termination of the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020. The FHLB elected to apply the TDR relief provided by the CARES Act.

Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.Reporting, as amended. On March 12, 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued temporary, optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The new guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The transactions primarily include (1) contract modifications, (2) hedging relationships, and (3) sale and/or transfer of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity. This guidance isbecame effective immediately for the FHLB, and the amendments may be applied prospectively through December 31, 2022. The FHLB is ineither elected or plans to elect the processmajority of evaluating the guidance,optional expedients and itsexceptions provided; however, the full effect on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows has not yet been determined.

Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. On August 29, 2018, In particular, during the FASB issued amended guidance that aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). This guidance became effective forfourth quarter of 2020, the FHLB forelected optional practical expedients specific to the interim and annual periods beginningdiscounting transition on January 1, 2020. The guidancea retrospective basis, which did not have a material impact on the FHLB’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.effect.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued amended guidance that modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans to improve disclosure effectiveness. This guidance becomesbecame effective for the annual periodsperiod ending after December 15, 2020 (December 31, 2020 for the FHLB) and will be applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. The FHLB does not intend to adoptadopted this guidance early.for the year ending December 31, 2020. The adoption of this guidance will affectaffected the FHLB's disclosures, but willdid not have any effect on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued amended guidance that modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements to improve disclosure effectiveness. This guidance became effective for the FHLB for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance will affect the FHLB's disclosures, but will not have any effect on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting of credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to immediately record the full amount of expected credit losses in their loan portfolios. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The guidance also requires, among other things, credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses and expanded disclosure requirements. The guidance became effective for the FHLB for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The guidance was applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance was effective. The adoption of this guidance did not result in an allowance for

credit losses for certain financial instruments including Advances, U.S. obligation/GSE investments, securities purchased under agreement to resell and other short-term investments given the specific terms, issuer guarantees, and/or collateralized/secured nature of the instruments. For mortgage loans held for portfolio, the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


Note 3 - Cash and Due from Banks

Cash and due from banks on the Statement of Condition includes cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, compensating balances, and amounts due from correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve Bank.

Compensating Balances. The FHLB maintains collected cash balances with commercial banks in return for certain services. These agreements contain no legal restrictions on the withdrawal of funds. The average collected cash balances for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were approximately $133,000$260,000 and $118,000.$133,000.
94


Pass-through Deposit Reserves. The FHLB acts as a pass-through correspondent for member institutions required to deposit reserves with the Federal Reserve Banks. There were 0 pass-through deposit reserves as of December 31, 2020. The amount shown as “Cash and due from banks” includes pass-through reserves deposited with Federal Reserve Banks of approximately $10,239,000 and $6,478,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.2019.


Note 4 - Investments

The FHLB makes short-term investments in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold and may make other investments in debt securities, which are classified as either trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold

The FHLB invests in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold to provide short-term liquidity. These investments are transacted with counterparties that have received a credit rating of single-A or greater by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). The FHLB’s internal ratings of these counterparties may differ from those issued by an NRSRO.

Federal funds sold are unsecured loans that are generally transacted on an overnight term. Finance Agency regulations include a limit on the amount of unsecured credit the FHLB may extend to a counterparty. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, all investments in interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold were repaid or expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms. NaN allowance for credit losses was recorded for these assets at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Carrying values of interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold exclude accrued interest receivable of (in thousands) $72 and $10 as of December 31, 2020, and $1,162 and $210 as of December 31, 2019.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell are short-term and are structured such that they are evaluated regularly to determine if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral (i.e., subject to collateral maintenance provisions). If so, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash, generally by the next business day. Based upon the collateral held as security and collateral maintenance provisions with counterparties, the FHLB determined that 0 allowance for credit losses was needed for its securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 2020 and 2019. The carrying value of securities purchased under agreements to resell excludes accrued interest receivable of (in thousands) $13 and $3,503 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Debt Securities

The FHLB invests in debt securities, which are classified as either trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. The FHLB is prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from purchasing certain higher-risk securities, such as equity securities and debt instruments that are not investment quality, other than certain investments targeted at low-income persons or communities and instruments that experienced credit deterioration after their purchase by the FHLB.

95

Trading Securities

Table 4.1 - Trading Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)
Fair ValueDecember 31, 2019 December 31, 2018Fair ValueDecember 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Non-MBS:   
Non-mortgage-backed securities (non-MBS):Non-mortgage-backed securities (non-MBS):
U.S. Treasury obligations$9,626,964
 $
U.S. Treasury obligations$8,362,211 $9,626,964 
GSE obligations1,988,259
 223,368
GSE obligations2,125,580  1,988,259 
Total non-MBS11,615,223
 223,368
Total non-MBS10,487,791 11,615,223 
MBS:   
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS):Mortgage-backed securities (MBS):   
U.S. obligation single-family MBS470
 612
U.S. obligation single-family MBS333  470 
Total$11,615,693
 $223,980
Total$10,488,124  $11,615,693 


Table 4.2 - Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Securities (in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Net gains (losses) on trading securities held at period end$268,392  $210,207 $7,086 
Net gains (losses) on trading securities matured during the period(10,826) 
Net gains (losses) on trading securities$257,566  $210,207 $7,086 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Net gains (losses) on trading securities held at period end$210,207
 $7,086
 $(6)
Net gains (losses) on trading securities$210,207
 $7,086
 $(6)




Note 5 - Available-for-Sale Securities

Table 5.14.3 - Available-for-Sale Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019
 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
Certificates of deposit$1,410,000
 $111
 $
 $1,410,111
GSE obligations131,815
 601
 (342) 132,074
Total$1,541,815
 $712
 $(342) $1,542,185
        
 December 31, 2018
 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
Certificates of deposit$2,350,000
 $71
 $(69) $2,350,002
GSE obligations53,007
 16
 (128) 52,895
Total$2,403,007
 $87
 $(197) $2,402,897

(1)Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion, amortization, and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments.

 December 31, 2020
 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Non-MBS:
GSE obligations$140,600 $1,802 $$142,402 
Total non-MBS140,600 1,802 142,402 
MBS:
GSE multi-family MBS146,269 2,916 149,185 
Total MBS146,269 2,916 149,185 
Total$286,869 $4,718 $$291,587 
 December 31, 2019
 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Certificates of deposit$1,410,000  $111  $$1,410,111 
GSE obligations131,815 601 (342)132,074 
Total$1,541,815 $712 $(342)$1,542,185 
Table 5.2 - Available-for-Sale Securities in a Continuous Unrealized Loss Position(1)Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion, amortization, and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments, and excludes accrued interest receivable of (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019
 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or more Total
 Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
GSE obligations$17,071
 $(126) $21,574
 $(216) $38,645
 $(342)
Total$17,071
 $(126) $21,574
 $(216) $38,645
 $(342)


All securities outstanding with gross unrealized losses $1,242 and $5,149 at December 31, 2018 were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months.2020 and 2019.

Table 5.3 - Available-for-Sale Securities by Contractual Maturity (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Year of Maturity
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
Due in 1 year or less$1,410,000
 $1,410,111
 $2,350,000
 $2,350,002
Due after 1 year through 5 years
 
 
 
Due after 5 years through 10 years119,771
 119,870
 48,999
 48,904
Due after 10 years12,044
 12,204
 4,008
 3,991
Total$1,541,815
 $1,542,185
 $2,403,007
 $2,402,897


96

Table of Contents
Table 5.4 - Interest Rate Payment Terms of Available-for-Sale Securities (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities:   
Fixed-rate$1,541,815
 $2,403,007


Realized Gains and Losses. The FHLB had 0 sales of securities out of its available-for-sale portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, or 2017.


Note 6 - Held-to-Maturity Securities

Table 6.1 - Held-to-Maturity Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019
 
Amortized Cost (1)
 
Gross Unrecognized Holding
Gains
 Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses Fair Value
Non-MBS:       
U.S. Treasury obligations$35,171
 $5
 $
 $35,176
Total non-MBS35,171
 5
 
 35,176
MBS:       
U.S. obligation single-family MBS1,670,783
 13,499
 (239) 1,684,043
GSE single-family MBS4,500,471
 40,386
 (24,072) 4,516,785
GSE multi-family MBS7,292,894
 54
 (27,745) 7,265,203
Total MBS13,464,148
 53,939
 (52,056) 13,466,031
Total$13,499,319
 $53,944
 $(52,056) $13,501,207
        
 December 31, 2018
 
Amortized Cost (1)
 
Gross Unrecognized Holding
Gains
 Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses Fair Value
Non-MBS:       
U.S. Treasury obligations$35,667
 $
 $(6) $35,661
Total non-MBS35,667
 
 (6) 35,661
MBS:       
U.S. obligation single-family MBS2,040,642
 540
 (47,463) 1,993,719
GSE single-family MBS5,543,524
 9,891
 (162,097) 5,391,318
GSE multi-family MBS8,171,389
 1,739
 (18,458) 8,154,670
Total MBS15,755,555
 12,170
 (228,018) 15,539,707
Total$15,791,222
 $12,170
 $(228,024) $15,575,368
(1)Carrying value equals amortized cost.

Table 6.2 - Net Purchased Premiums Included in the Amortized Cost of MBS Classified as Held-to-Maturity (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Premiums$32,071
 $42,299
Discounts(13,996) (19,730)
Net purchased premiums$18,075
 $22,569



Table 6.34.4 summarizes the held-to-maturityavailable-for-sale securities with unrealized losses, which are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. All securities outstanding at December 31, 2020 had gross unrealized gains.

Table 6.34.4 - Available-for-Sale Securities in a Continuous Unrealized Loss Position (in thousands)
December 31, 2019
Less than 12 Months12 Months or moreTotal
Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesFair ValueGross Unrealized LossesFair ValueGross Unrealized Losses
GSE obligations$17,071 $(126)$21,574 $(216)$38,645 $(342)
Total$17,071 $(126)$21,574 $(216)$38,645 $(342)

Table 4.5 - Available-for-Sale Securities by Contractual Maturity (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Year of MaturityAmortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Non-MBS:
Due in 1 year or less$ $ $1,410,000  $1,410,111 
Due after 1 year through 5 years11,248 11,309 
Due after 5 years through 10 years116,096 117,507 119,771 119,870 
Due after 10 years13,256 13,586 12,044 12,204 
Total non-MBS140,600 142,402 1,541,815 1,542,185 
MBS (1)
146,269 149,185 
Total$286,869 $291,587 $1,541,815 $1,542,185 
(1)MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Table 4.6 - Interest Rate Payment Terms of Available-for-Sale Securities (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Amortized cost of non-MBS:   
Fixed-rate$140,600  $1,541,815 
Total amortized cost of non-MBS140,600 1,541,815 
Amortized cost of MBS:
Fixed-rate146,269 
Total amortized cost of MBS146,269 
Total$286,869 $1,541,815 

The FHLB had 0 sales of securities out of its available-for-sale portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018.

97

Table of Contents
Held-to-Maturity Securities

Table 4.7 - Held-to-Maturity Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)
December 31, 2020
Amortized Cost (1)
Gross Unrecognized Holding
Gains
Gross Unrecognized Holding LossesFair Value
Non-MBS:
U.S. Treasury obligations$41,398 $$$41,399 
Total non-MBS41,398 41,399 
MBS:    
U.S. obligation single-family MBS986,399 41,218 1,027,617 
GSE single-family MBS3,013,326 105,657 (2)3,118,981 
GSE multi-family MBS5,607,048 5,146 (8,055)5,604,139 
Total MBS9,606,773 152,021 (8,057)9,750,737 
Total$9,648,171 $152,022 $(8,057)$9,792,136 
 
 December 31, 2019
 
Amortized Cost (1)
Gross Unrecognized Holding
Gains
Gross Unrecognized Holding LossesFair Value
Non-MBS:
U.S. Treasury obligations$35,171 $$$35,176 
Total non-MBS35,171 35,176 
MBS:   
U.S. obligation single-family MBS1,670,783 13,499 (239)1,684,043 
GSE single-family MBS4,500,471 40,386 (24,072)4,516,785 
GSE multi-family MBS7,292,894 54 (27,745)7,265,203 
Total MBS13,464,148 53,939 (52,056)13,466,031 
Total$13,499,319 $53,944 $(52,056)$13,501,207 
(1)Carrying value equals amortized cost. Amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion and amortization and excludes accrued interest receivable of (in thousands) $9,609 and $20,365 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

98

Table of Contents
Table 4.8 - Net Purchased Premiums Included in the Amortized Cost of MBS Classified as Held-to-Maturity (in thousands)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Premiums$18,299 $32,071 
Discounts(7,269)(13,996)
Net purchased premiums$11,030 $18,075 

As required prior to adoption of the CECL accounting standard, Table 4.9 presents the HTM securities with unrealized losses, which are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2019.

Table 4.9 - Held-to-Maturity Securities in a Continuous Unrealized Loss Position (in thousands)
December 31, 2019
Less than 12 Months12 Months or moreTotal
 Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesFair ValueGross Unrealized LossesFair ValueGross Unrealized Losses
MBS:  
U.S. obligation single-family MBS$148,586 $(239)$$$148,586 $(239)
GSE single-family MBS702,730 (2,682)1,921,576 (21,390)2,624,306 (24,072)
GSE multi-family MBS3,385,731 (7,704)3,735,950 (20,041)7,121,681 (27,745)
Total MBS$4,237,047 $(10,625)$5,657,526 $(41,431)$9,894,573 $(52,056)
 December 31, 2019
 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or more Total
 Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
MBS:           
U.S. obligation single-family MBS$148,586
 $(239) $
 $
 $148,586
 $(239)
GSE single-family MBS702,730
 (2,682) 1,921,576
 (21,390) 2,624,306
 (24,072)
GSE multi-family MBS3,385,731
 (7,704) 3,735,950
 (20,041) 7,121,681
 (27,745)
Total$4,237,047
 $(10,625) $5,657,526
 $(41,431) $9,894,573
 $(52,056)
            
 December 31, 2018
 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or more Total
 Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
Non-MBS:           
U.S. Treasury obligations$35,661
 $(6) $
 $
 $35,661
 $(6)
Total non-MBS35,661
 (6) 
 
 35,661
 (6)
MBS:           
U.S. obligation single-family MBS175,663
 (1,571) 1,526,835
 (45,892) 1,702,498
 (47,463)
GSE single-family MBS401,509
 (1,581) 3,859,608
 (160,516) 4,261,117
 (162,097)
GSE multi-family MBS5,976,323
 (18,185) 229,739
 (273) 6,206,062
 (18,458)
Total MBS6,553,495
 (21,337) 5,616,182
 (206,681) 12,169,677
 (228,018)
Total$6,589,156
 $(21,343) $5,616,182
 $(206,681) $12,205,338
 $(228,024)


Table 6.44.10 - Held-to-Maturity Securities by Contractual Maturity (in thousands)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Year of Maturity
Amortized Cost (1)
Fair Value
Amortized Cost (1)
Fair Value
Non-MBS:    
Due in 1 year or less$41,398 $41,399 $35,171 $35,176 
Due after 1 year through 5 years
Due after 5 years through 10 years
Due after 10 years
Total non-MBS41,398 41,399 35,171 35,176 
MBS (2)
9,606,773 9,750,737 13,464,148 13,466,031 
Total$9,648,171 $9,792,136 $13,499,319 $13,501,207 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Year of Maturity
Amortized Cost (1)
 Fair Value 
Amortized Cost (1)
 Fair Value
Non-MBS:       
Due in 1 year or less$35,171
 $35,176
 $35,667
 $35,661
Due after 1 year through 5 years
 
 
 
Due after 5 years through 10 years
 
 
 
Due after 10 years
 
 
 
Total non-MBS35,171
 35,176
 35,667
 35,661
MBS (2)
13,464,148
 13,466,031
 15,755,555
 15,539,707
Total$13,499,319
 $13,501,207
 $15,791,222
 $15,575,368
(1)Carrying value equals amortized cost.
(1)Carrying value equals amortized cost.
(2)MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

(2)MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Table 6.54.11 - Interest Rate Payment Terms of Held-to-Maturity Securities (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Amortized cost of non-MBS:   
Fixed-rate$41,398  $35,171 
Total amortized cost of non-MBS41,398  35,171 
Amortized cost of MBS:   
Fixed-rate3,677,199  5,438,532 
Variable-rate5,929,574  8,025,616 
Total amortized cost of MBS9,606,773  13,464,148 
Total$9,648,171  $13,499,319 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Amortized cost of non-MBS:   
Fixed-rate$35,171
 $35,667
Total amortized cost of non-MBS35,171
 35,667
Amortized cost of MBS:   
Fixed-rate5,438,532
 6,652,055
Variable-rate8,025,616
 9,103,500
Total amortized cost of MBS13,464,148
 15,755,555
Total$13,499,319
 $15,791,222


99

Table of Contents
Realized Gains and Losses.From time to time the FHLB may sell securities out of its held-to-maturity portfolio. These securities, generally, have less than 15 percent of the acquired principal outstanding at the time of the sale. These sales are considered maturities for the purposes of security classification. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, or 2017, the FHLB did not0t sell any held-to-maturity securities.


Note 7 -Allowance for Credit Losses and Other-than-Temporary Impairment Analysison Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities

The FHLB evaluates any of its individual available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities holdingsfor credit losses on a quarterly basis. The FHLB adopted new accounting guidance for the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments on January 1, 2020. Prior to the adoption of CECL accounting guidance, the FHLB evaluated these securities for other-than-temporary impairment. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

The FHLB’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are certificates of deposit, U.S. Treasury obligations, GSE obligations, and MBS issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) that are backed by single-family or multi-family mortgage loans. The FHLB only purchases securities considered investment quality. At December 31, 2020, all available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were rated single-A, or above, by an NRSRO, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security used by the FHLB. The FHLB’s internal ratings of these securities may differ from those obtained from an NRSRO.

The FHLB evaluates individual available-for-sale securities for impairment by comparing the security’s fair value to its amortized cost. Impairment may exist when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.

U.S. Obligations and GSE Investments

For its U.S. obligations and GSE investments (MBS and non-MBS), the FHLB has determined that the strength of the issuers' guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the FHLB from losses based on current expectations.position). At December 31, 2020, 0 available-for-sale securities were in an unrealized loss position. As a result, the FHLB determined that, as of 0 allowance for credit losses was recorded on these available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2019, all of the gross unrealized losses on these investments were temporary as the declines in market value of these securities were not attributable to credit quality. Furthermore, the FHLB does not intend to sell the investments,2020, and it is not more likely than not that the FHLB will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. As a result, the FHLB did not consider any of these investmentsavailable-for-sale securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 20192019.
.

The FHLB evaluates its held-to-maturity securities for impairment on a collective, or pooled basis, unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. As of December 31, 2020, the FHLB had 0t established an allowance for credit loss on any held-to-maturity securities because the securities: (1) were all highly-rated and/or had short remaining terms to maturity, (2) had not experienced, nor did not considerthe FHLB expect, any payment default on the instruments, and (3) in the case of its investmentsU.S., GSE, or other agency obligations, carry an implicit or explicit government guarantee such that the FHLB considered the risk of nonpayment to be zero. Using the prior accounting methodology of other-than-temporary impairment for credit impairment, none of the FHLB's held-to-maturity securities were other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 20182019.
.


Note 85 - Advances

The FHLB offers a wide range of fixed- and variable-rate Advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics and optionality. Fixed-rate Advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Variable-rate Advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 10 years, where the interest rates reset periodically at a fixed spread to a specified index. The following table presents Advance redemptions by contractual maturity, including index-amortizing Advances, which are presented according to their predetermined amortization schedules.


100


Table of Contents
Table 8.15.1 - Advances by Redemption Term (dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Redemption TermAmountWeighted Average Interest
Rate
AmountWeighted Average Interest
Rate
Due in 1 year or less$12,064,753 0.75 %$32,342,198 1.78 %
Due after 1 year through 2 years1,986,446 1.88 4,477,497 2.19 
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,445,139 2.15 1,996,647 2.30 
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,809,523 1.97 1,408,948 2.50 
Due after 4 years through 5 years2,361,604 1.02 1,765,323 2.08 
Thereafter5,339,932 1.34 5,273,531 2.35 
Total principal amount25,007,397 1.16 47,264,144 1.94 
Commitment fees(170) (281) 
Discount on Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Advances(2,053) (3,148) 
Premiums 1,221  
Discounts(2,046) (2,530) 
Hedging adjustments358,173  109,929  
Fair value option valuation adjustments and accrued interest702 238 
Total (1)
$25,362,003  $47,369,573  
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Redemption TermAmount 
Weighted Average Interest
Rate
 Amount 
Weighted Average Interest
Rate
Due in 1 year or less$32,342,198
 1.78% $38,592,494
 2.56%
Due after 1 year through 2 years4,477,497
 2.19
 6,461,276
 2.39
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,996,647
 2.30
 3,146,830
 2.30
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,408,948
 2.50
 1,145,118
 2.56
Due after 4 years through 5 years1,765,323
 2.08
 935,439
 2.76
Thereafter5,273,531
 2.35
 4,591,015
 2.98
Total principal amount47,264,144
 1.94
 54,872,172
 2.56
Commitment fees(281)   (456)  
Discount on Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Advances(3,148)   (4,386)  
Premiums1,221
   1,510
  
Discounts(2,530)   (3,090)  
Hedging adjustments109,929
   (43,506)  
Fair value option valuation adjustments and accrued interest238
   8
  
Total$47,369,573
   $54,822,252
  
(1)Carrying values exclude accrued interest receivable of (in thousands) $26,426 and $60,682 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.


The FHLB offers certain fixed and variable-rate Advances to members that may be prepaid on specified dates (call dates) without incurring prepayment or termination fees (callable Advances). If the call option is exercised, replacement funding may be available to members. Other Advances may only be prepaid subject to a prepayment fee paid to the FHLB that makes the FHLB financially indifferent to the prepayment of the Advance.

Table 8.25.2 - Advances by Redemption Term or Next Call Date (in thousands)
Redemption Term or Next Call DateDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Due in 1 year or less$15,375,354 $35,366,608 
Due after 1 year through 2 years1,716,058 4,982,222 
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,434,377 1,724,647 
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,785,672 1,381,718 
Due after 4 years through 5 years877,504 1,535,418 
Thereafter3,818,432 2,273,531 
Total principal amount$25,007,397 $47,264,144 
Redemption Term or Next Call DateDecember 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Due in 1 year or less$35,366,608
 $43,793,555
Due after 1 year through 2 years4,982,222
 4,338,117
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,724,647
 3,490,580
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,381,718
 753,716
Due after 4 years through 5 years1,535,418
 905,189
Thereafter2,273,531
 1,591,015
Total principal amount$47,264,144
 $54,872,172


The FHLB also offers putable Advances. With a putable Advance, the FHLB effectively purchases put options from the member that allows the FHLB to terminate the Advance at predetermined dates. The FHLB normally would exercise its put option when interest rates increase relative to contractual rates.


101

Table of Contents
Table 8.35.3 - Advances by Redemption Term or Next Put Date for Putable Advances (in thousands)
Redemption Term or Next Put DateDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Due in 1 year or less$14,407,003 $33,451,448 
Due after 1 year through 2 years2,146,446 4,777,497 
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,485,139 2,129,647 
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,855,273 1,238,948 
Due after 4 years through 5 years2,346,604 1,611,073 
Thereafter2,766,932 4,055,531 
Total principal amount$25,007,397 $47,264,144 
Redemption Term or Next Put DateDecember 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Due in 1 year or less$33,451,448
 $38,827,494
Due after 1 year through 2 years4,777,497
 6,611,276
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,129,647
 3,221,830
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,238,948
 1,145,118
Due after 4 years through 5 years1,611,073
 835,439
Thereafter4,055,531
 4,231,015
Total principal amount$47,264,144
 $54,872,172


Table 8.45.4 - Advances by Interest Rate Payment Terms (in thousands)                    
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Fixed-rate (1)
   
Due in one year or less$25,918,472
 $14,965,711
Due after one year10,194,636
 9,022,587
Total fixed-rate (1)
36,113,108
 23,988,298
Variable-rate (1)
   
Due in one year or less6,423,726
 23,626,783
Due after one year4,727,310
 7,257,091
Total variable-rate (1)
11,151,036
 30,883,874
Total principal amount$47,264,144
 $54,872,172
(1)Payment terms based on current interest rate terms, which reflect any option exercises or rate conversions that have occurred subsequent to the related Advance issuance.

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Fixed-rate (1)
Due in one year or less$9,681,997 $25,918,472 
Due after one year9,513,793 10,194,636 
Total fixed-rate (1)
19,195,790 36,113,108 
Variable-rate (1)
Due in one year or less2,382,756 6,423,726 
Due after one year3,428,851 4,727,310 
Total variable-rate (1)
5,811,607 11,151,036 
Total principal amount$25,007,397 $47,264,144 
(1)Payment terms based on current interest rate terms, which reflect any option exercises or rate conversions that have occurred subsequent to the related Advance Concentrations. issuance.

Credit Risk Exposure and Security Terms

The FHLB's Advances outstanding that were greater than or equal to $1.0 billion per borrower were $35.1 billion (74.2%) and $41.3 billion (75.3%) at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These Advances wereare made to 11 and 10 borrowers (members and former members) at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See Note 10 for information related to the FHLB's credit risk on Advances and allowance methodology for credit losses.

Table 8.5 - Borrowers Holding Five Percent or more of Total Advances, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB (dollars in millions)
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Principal % of Total Principal Amount of Advances  Principal % of Total Principal Amount of Advances
U.S. Bank, N.A.$13,874
 29% JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.$23,400
 43%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.4,500
 10
 U.S. Bank, N.A.4,574
 8
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,883
 8
 Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,727
 7
Total$22,257
 47% Total$31,701
 58%



Note 9 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

Total mortgage loans held for portfolio represent residential mortgage loans under the MPP that the FHLB's members originate, credit enhance, and then sell to the FHLB. The FHLB does not service any of these loans. The FHLB plans to retain its existing portfolio of mortgage loans.

Table 9.1 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Unpaid principal balance:   
Fixed rate medium-term single-family mortgage loans (1)
$773,575
 $933,340
Fixed rate long-term single-family mortgage loans10,207,367
 9,338,814
Total unpaid principal balance10,980,942
 10,272,154
Premiums241,356
 227,161
Discounts(2,166) (2,603)
Hedging basis adjustments (2)
15,932
 5,045
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio$11,236,064
 $10,501,757

(1)Medium-term is defined as a term of 15 years or less.
(2)Represents the unamortized balance of the mortgage purchase commitments' market values at the time of settlement. The market value of the commitment is included in the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.

Table 9.2 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio by Collateral/Guarantee Type (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Unpaid principal balance:   
Conventional mortgage loans$10,750,526
 $9,999,307
FHA mortgage loans230,416
 272,847
Total unpaid principal balance$10,980,942
 $10,272,154


Table 9.3 - Members, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB, and Former Members Selling Five Percent or more of Total Unpaid Principal (dollars in millions)
 December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018
 Principal % of Total  Principal % of Total
Union Savings Bank$3,574
 33% Union Savings Bank$3,449
 34%
Guardian Savings Bank FSB1,004
 9
 Guardian Savings Bank FSB987
 10
FirstBank714
 7
  

 




Note 10 - Allowance for Credit Losses

The FHLB has established an allowance methodology for each of the FHLB's portfolio segments: credit products (Advances, Letters of Credit and other extensions of credit to members); FHA mortgage loans held for portfolio; and conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.

Credit Products

member financial institutions. The FHLB manages its credit exposure to credit productsAdvances through an integrated approach that includes establishing a credit limit for each borrower and ongoing review of each borrower's financial condition, coupled with collateral and lending policies to limit risk of loss while balancing borrowers' needs for a reliable source of funding.

In addition, the FHLB lends to eligible borrowers in accordance with federal law and Finance Agency regulations, which require the FHLB to obtain sufficient collateral to fully secure credit products. Collateral eligible to secure new or renewed Advances includes:

one-to-four family and multi-family mortgage loans (delinquent for no more than 90 days) and securities representing such mortgages;
loans and securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any U.S. government agency (for example, mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae);
cash or deposits in the FHLB;
certain other collateral that is real estate-related, provided that the collateral has a readily ascertainable value and that the FHLB can perfect a security interest in it; and
certain qualifying securities representing undivided equity interests in eligible Advance collateral.

Residential mortgage loans are the principal form of collateral for Advances. The estimated value of the collateral required to secure each member's credit products is calculated by applying collateral discounts, or haircuts, to the value of the collateral. The FHLB accepts certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, deposits and other real estate related assets as collateral. In addition, community financial institutions are eligible to utilize expanded statutory collateral provisions for small business and agribusiness loans. The FHLB's capital stock owned by its member borrowers is also pledged as collateral. Collateral arrangements and a member’s borrowing capacity vary based on the financial condition and performance of the institution, the types of collateral pledged and the overall quality of those assets. The FHLB can also require additional or substitute collateral to protect its security interest. The FHLB also has policies and procedures for validating the reasonableness of its collateral valuations and makes changes to its collateral guidelines, as necessary, based on current market conditions. In addition, collateral verifications and reviews are performed by the FHLB based on the risk profile of the borrower. Management of the FHLB believes that these policies effectively manage the FHLB's credit risk from Advances.

102

Table of Contents


Members experiencing financial difficulties are subject to FHLB-performed “stress tests” of the impact of poorly performing assets on the member’s capital and loss reserve positions. Depending on the results of these tests and the level of over-collateralization, a member may be allowed to maintain pledged loan assets in its custody, may be required to deliver those loans into the custody of the FHLB or its agent, or may be required to provide details on those loans to facilitate an estimate of their fair value. The FHLB perfects its security interest in all pledged collateral. The FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the FHLB by a member priority over the claims or rights of any other party except for claims or rights of a third party that would otherwise be entitled to priority under applicable law and that are held by a bona fide purchaser for value or by a secured party holding a prior perfected security interest.

Using a risk-based approach, the FHLB considers the payment status, collateralization levels, and borrower's financial condition to be indicators of credit quality for its credit products. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the FHLB did 0t have any Advances that were past due, in non-accrual status or considered impaired. In addition, there were 0 troubled debt restructurings related to Advances of the FHLB during 2020 or 2019. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the FHLB had rights to collateral on a member-by-member basis with an estimated value in excess of its outstanding extensions of credit.


The FHLB evaluates and makes changes to its collateral guidelines, as necessary, based on current market conditions. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the FHLB did not have any Advances that were past due, in non-accrual status or impaired. In addition, there were no troubled debt restructurings related to credit products of the FHLB during 2019 or 2018.

The FHLB has not experienced any credit losses on Advances since it was founded in 1932. Based upon the collateral held as security, its credit extension and collateral policies and the repayment history on credit products,Advances, the FHLB did not recordexpect any credit losses on credit productsAdvances as of December 31, 2019 or 2018. Accordingly,2020 and, therefore, 0 allowance for credit losses on Advances was recorded. For the same reasons, the FHLB did not0t record any allowance for credit losses on Advances.Advances at December 31, 2019.


Advance Concentrations
At
The FHLB's Advances are concentrated in commercial banks, savings institutions, and insurance companies. Advance borrower concentrations can change significantly due to members' ability to quickly increase or decrease their amount of Advances based on their current funding needs.

Table 5.5 - Borrowers Holding Five Percent or more of Total Advances, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB (dollars in millions)
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
 Principal% of Total Principal Amount of Advances  Principal% of Total Principal Amount of Advances
U.S. Bank, N.A.$4,273 17 %U.S. Bank, N.A.$13,874 29 %
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,443 14 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.4,500 10 
Nationwide Life Insurance Company2,062 Third Federal Savings and Loan Association3,883 
Protective Life Insurance Company1,955 Total$22,257 47 %
Western-Southern Life Assurance Co.1,344 
Total$13,077 52 %


Note 6 - Mortgage Loans

Total mortgage loans held for portfolio represent residential mortgage loans under the Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP) that the FHLB's members originate, credit enhance, and then sell to the FHLB. The FHLB does not service any of these loans. The FHLB plans to retain its existing portfolio of mortgage loans.
103

Table of Contents

Table 6.1 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Fixed rate medium-term single-family mortgage loans (1)
$731,756 $773,575 
Fixed rate long-term single-family mortgage loans8,584,239 10,207,367 
Total unpaid principal balance9,315,995 10,980,942 
Premiums208,281 241,356 
Discounts(1,636)(2,166)
Hedging basis adjustments (2)
26,114 15,932 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio (3)
9,548,754 11,236,064 
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans(248)(711)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$9,548,506 $11,235,353 
(1)Medium-term is defined as a term of 15 years or less.
(2)Represents the unamortized balance of the mortgage purchase commitments' market values at the time of settlement. The market value of the commitment is included in the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.
(3)Excludes accrued interest receivable of (in thousands) $30,109 and $36,739 at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Table 6.2 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio by Collateral/Guarantee Type (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Conventional mortgage loans$9,133,942 $10,750,526 
FHA mortgage loans182,053 230,416 
Total unpaid principal balance$9,315,995 $10,980,942 

Table 6.3 - Members, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB, and Former Members Selling Five Percent or more of Total Unpaid Principal (dollars in millions)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
 Principal% of Total Principal% of Total
Union Savings Bank$2,826 30 %Union Savings Bank$3,574 33 %
Guardian Savings Bank FSB796 Guardian Savings Bank FSB1,004 
FirstBank714 

Credit Risk Exposure

The FHLB manages credit risk exposure for conventional mortgage loans primarily though conservative underwriting and purchasing loans with characteristics consistent with favorable expected credit performance and by applying various credit enhancements.

Credit Enhancements. The conventional mortgage loans under the MPP are supported by some combination of credit enhancements (primary mortgage insurance (PMI), supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) and the Lender Risk Account (LRA), including pooled LRA for those members participating in an aggregated MPP pool). These credit enhancements apply after a homeowner’s equity is exhausted. Beginning in February 2011, the FHLB discontinued the use of SMI for all new loan purchases and replaced it with expanded use of the LRA. The LRA is funded by the FHLB upfront as a portion of the purchase proceeds. The LRA is recorded in other liabilities in the Statement of Condition. Excess funds from the LRA are released to the member in accordance with the terms of the Master Commitment Contract, which is typically after five years, subject to performance of the related loan pool. The LRA established for a pool of loans is limited to only covering losses of that specific pool of loans. Because the FHA makes an explicit guarantee on FHA mortgage loans, the FHLB does not require any credit enhancements on these loans beyond primary mortgage insurance.

104

Table of Contents
Table 6.4 - Changes in the LRA (in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
LRA at beginning of year$233,476 $213,260 $200,745 
Additions28,795 29,558 24,784 
Claims(101)(113)(492)
Scheduled distributions(15,735)(9,229)(11,777)
LRA at end of period$246,435 $233,476 $213,260 

Mortgage Loans Forbearance Plans. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has caused economic strain on many home loan borrowers, the FHLB’s mortgage loan servicers may grant a forbearance period to borrowers who have had COVID-19 related hardships regardless of the payment status of the loan at the time of the request. Based on the most recent information received from mortgage servicers, as of December 31, 2020, there was approximately (in thousands) $77,207 in unpaid principal balance of conventional mortgage loans under a forbearance plan as a result of COVID-19, which represented one percent of conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.

Payment Status of Mortgage Loans. The key credit quality indicator for conventional mortgage loans is payment status, which allows the FHLB to monitor the migration of past due loans. Past due loans are those where the borrower has failed to make a full payment of principal and interest within one month of its due date. Although certain loans have been granted a forbearance period as noted above, there has been no change in the terms of the loan. Accordingly, when a borrower fails to make timely payments of principal and/or interest for loans under forbearance, they are considered past due. Table 6.5presents the payment status of conventional mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2020, (in thousands) $11,381 in unpaid principal balance of conventional loans under forbearance had a current payment status, (in thousands) $5,933 was 30 to 59 days past due, (in thousands) $9,190 was 60 to 89 days past due, and (in thousands) $50,703 was greater than 90 days past due.

Table 6.5 - Credit Quality Indicator of Conventional Mortgage Loans (in thousands)
December 31, 2020
Origination Year
Payment status, at amortized cost (1):
Prior to 20162016 to 2020Total
Past due 30-59 days$16,812 $19,036 $35,848 
Past due 60-89 days7,245 7,553 14,798 
Past due 90 days or more24,651 39,921 64,572 
Total past due mortgage loans48,708 66,510 115,218 
Current mortgage loans2,555,139 6,694,837 9,249,976 
Total conventional mortgage loans$2,603,847 $6,761,347 $9,365,194 
December 31, 2019
Payment status, at recorded investment (1):
Conventional Loans
Past due 30-59 days$35,416 
Past due 60-89 days5,572 
Past due 90 days or more12,421 
Total past due mortgage loans53,409 
Current mortgage loans10,985,818 
Total conventional mortgage loans$11,039,227 
(1)The recorded investment at December 31, 2019 includes accrued interest receivable whereas the amortized cost at December 31, 2020 excludes accrued interest receivable.

105

Table of Contents
Other delinquency statistics include loans in process of foreclosure, serious delinquency rates, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, and non-accrual loans. Table 6.6 presents other delinquency statistics of mortgage loans.

Table 6.6 - Other Delinquency Statistics (dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2020
Amortized Cost:Conventional MPP LoansFHA LoansTotal
In process of foreclosure (1)
$5,031 $617 $5,648 
Serious delinquency rate (2)
0.69 %3.28 %0.74 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (3)
$58,881 $5,961 $64,842 
Loans on non-accrual status$6,721 $$6,721 
December 31, 2019
Recorded Investment:Conventional MPP LoansFHA LoansTotal
In process of foreclosure (1)
$8,311 $2,515 $10,826 
Serious delinquency rate (2)
0.11 %2.49 %0.16 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (3)
$11,935 $5,805 $17,740 
Loans on non-accrual status$1,902 $$1,902 
(1)Includes loans where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported. During the year ended December 31, 2020, there were foreclosure moratoriums enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
(2)Loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure (including past due or current loans in the process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total loan portfolio class.
(3)Each conventional loan past due 90 days or more still accruing interest is on a schedule/scheduled monthly settlement basis and 2018,contains one or more credit enhancements. Loans that are well secured and in the process of collection as a result of remaining credit enhancements and schedule/scheduled settlement are not placed on non-accrual status.

The FHLB did 0t have any real estate owned at December 31, 2020 or 2019.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. A troubled debt restructuring is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties and that concession would not record any liabilityhave been considered otherwise. The FHLB's troubled debt restructurings primarily involve loans where an agreement permits the recapitalization of past due amounts up to reflect anthe original loan amount and certain loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The FHLB's amortized cost in modified loans considered troubled debt restructurings was (in thousands) $18,888 at December 31, 2020. The FHLB's recorded investment in loans considered troubled debt restructurings was (in thousands) $13,514 at December 31, 2019. As noted above, amortized cost excludes accrued interest receivable whereas recorded investment includes accrued interest receivable. The amount of troubled debt restructurings is not considered material to the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Evaluation of Credit Losses

The current methodology used to develop the allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures. See Note 20 for additional information on the FHLB's off-balance sheet credit exposure.mortgage loans is described below.

Mortgage Loans - FHA. Loans Held for Portfolio- FHA

The FHLB invests in fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties insured by the FHA. The FHLB expects to recover any losses from such loans from the FHA. Any losses from these loans that are not recovered from the FHA would be due to a claim rejection by the FHA and, as such, would be recoverable from the selling participating financial institutions. Therefore, the FHLB only has credit risk for these loans if the seller or servicer fails to pay for losses not covered by the FHA insurance. As a result, the FHLB did not establishrecord an allowance for credit losses on its FHA insured mortgage loans.loans at December 31, 2020. Furthermore, due to the insurance, none of these mortgage loans have been placed on non-accrual status.

106

Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans - Conventional MPP. Conventional loans are evaluated collectively when similar risk characteristics exist; loans that do not share risk characteristics with other pools are removed from the collective evaluation and evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis. For loans with similar risk characteristics, the FHLB determines the allowance for credit losses through analyses that include consideration of various loan portfolio and collateral-related characteristics, such as past performance, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of expected economic conditions. The FHLB uses a model that employs a variety of methods, such as projected cash flows to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the loans. This model relies on a number of inputs, such as both current and forecasted property values and interest rates as well as historical borrower behavior experience. The FHLB’s calculation of expected credit losses includes a forecast of home prices over the entire contractual terms of its conventional loans rather than a reversion to historical home price trends after an initial forecast period. The FHLB also incorporates associated credit enhancements to determine estimated expected credit losses.

If a loan is required to be evaluated on an individual basis, the FHLB estimates the present value of expected cash flows, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Certain conventional loans may be evaluated for credit losses by using the practical expedient for collateral dependent assets. A mortgage loan is considered collateral dependent if repayment is expected to be provided by the sale of the underlying property, that is, if it is considered likely that the borrower will default. The FHLB may estimate the fair value of this collateral by either applying an appropriate loss severity rate, using third-party estimates, or using a property valuation model. The expected credit loss of a collateral dependent mortgage loan is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. The FHLB will either reserve for these estimated losses or record a direct charge-off of the loan balance, if certain triggering criteria are met. Expected recoveries of prior charge-offs, if any, are included in the allowance for credit losses.

The FHLB also assesses other qualitative factors in its estimation of loan losses for the collectively evaluated population. This amount represents a subjective management judgment, based on facts and circumstances that exist as of the reporting date, which is intended to cover other expected losses that may not otherwise be captured in the methodology described above.

Prior to the adoption of the CECL accounting guidance, the methodology used to develop the allowance for credit losses for mortgage loans is described below.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - FHA. The FHLB's prior methodology for evaluating FHA loans for credit losses is consistent with the FHLB's current methodology described above. As a result, the FHLB did not establish an allowance for credit losses on its FHA insured mortgage loans at December 31, 2019.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - Conventional Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP)

MPP. The FHLB determinesdetermined the allowance for conventional loans through analyses that includeincluded consideration of various data observations such as past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral-related characteristics, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The measurement of the allowance for credit losses consistsconsisted of: (1) collectively evaluating homogeneous pools of residential mortgage loans; (2) reviewing specifically identified loans for impairment; and (3) considering other relevant qualitative factors.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans.Loans: The credit risk analysis of conventional loans evaluated collectively for impairment considersconsidered historical delinquency migration, appliesapplied estimated loss severities, and incorporatesincorporated the associated credit enhancements in order to determine the FHLB's best estimate of probable incurred losses at the reporting date. Migration analysis is a methodology for determining, through the FHLB's experience over a historical period, the rate of default on loans. The FHLB appliesapplied migration analysis to loans based on payment status categories such as current, 30, 60, and 90 days past due. The FHLB then estimatesestimated how many loans in these categories may migrate to a loss realization event and appliesapplied a current loss severity to estimate losses. The estimated losses arewere then reduced by the probable cash flows resulting from available credit enhancements. To properly determine the credit enhancements available to recover estimated losses, the FHLB performsperformed the credit risk analysis of all conventional mortgage loans at the individual Master Commitment Contract level. The Master Commitment Contract is an agreement with a member in which the member agrees to make a best efforts attempt to sell a specific dollar amount of loans to the FHLB, generally over a one-year period. Any credit enhancement cash flows that arewere projected and assessed as not probable of receipt dodid not reduce estimated losses.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans.Loans: Conventional mortgage loans that arewere considered troubled debt restructurings arewere specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The FHLB measuresmeasured impairment of these specifically identified loans by either estimating the present value of expected cash flows, estimating the loan's observable

market price, or estimating the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The FHLB removesremoved specifically identified loans evaluated for impairment from the collectively evaluated mortgage loan population.

107

Table of Contents
Qualitative Factors.Factors: The FHLB also assessesassessed other qualitative factors in its estimation of loan losses for the collectively evaluated population. This amount representsrepresented a subjective management judgment, based on facts and circumstances that existexisted as of the reporting date, which iswas intended to cover other incurred losses that may not otherwise behave been captured in the methodology described above.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Conventional Mortgage Loans. The FHLB established an allowance for credit losses on its conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio. The following tables presenttable presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses on conventional mortgage loans.

Table 6.7 - Allowance for Credit Losses on Conventional Mortgage Loans (in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance, beginning of period$711 $840 $1,190 
Adjustment for cumulative effect of accounting change(366)
Net charge offs(97)(129)(350)
Balance, end of period$248 $711 $840 

As required by prior accounting guidance for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, as well asTable 6.8 presents the recorded investment in mortgage loans by impairment methodology.methodology at December 31, 2019. The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan adjusted for accrued interest, unamortized premiums or discounts, hedging basis adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any allowance.

Table 10.1 - Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses on Conventional Mortgage Loans (in thousands)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Balance, beginning of period$840
 $1,190
 $1,142
Net charge offs(129) (350) (452)
Provision for credit losses
 
 500
Balance, end of period$711
 $840
 $1,190


Table 10.26.8 - Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment on Conventional Mortgage Loans by Impairment Methodology (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Allowance for credit losses:   
Collectively evaluated for impairment$711
 $840
Individually evaluated for impairment
 
Total allowance for credit losses$711
 $840
Recorded investment:   
Collectively evaluated for impairment$11,025,713
 $10,249,169
Individually evaluated for impairment13,514
 10,554
Total recorded investment$11,039,227
 $10,259,723


Credit Enhancements. The conventional mortgage loans under the MPP are supported by some combination of credit enhancements (primary mortgage insurance (PMI), supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) and the Lender Risk Account (LRA), including pooled LRA for those members participating in an aggregated MPP pool). The amount of credit enhancements needed to protect the FHLB against credit losses is determined through use of a third-party default model. These credit enhancements apply after a homeowner's equity is exhausted. Beginning in February 2011, the FHLB discontinued the use of SMI for all new loan purchases and replaced it with expanded use of the LRA. The LRA is funded by the FHLB as a portion of the purchase proceeds to cover expected losses. The LRA is recorded in other liabilities in the Statements of Condition. Excess funds over required balances are returned to the member in accordance with a step-down schedule that is established upon execution of a Master Commitment Contract, subject to performance of the related loan pool. The LRA established for a pool of loans is limited to only covering losses of that specific pool of loans.


Table 10.3 - Changes in the LRA (in thousands)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
LRA at beginning of year$213,260
 $200,745
 $187,684
Additions29,558
 24,784
 20,677
Claims(113) (492) (506)
Scheduled distributions(9,229) (11,777) (7,110)
LRA at end of period$233,476
 $213,260
 $200,745



Credit Quality Indicator and Other Delinquency Statistics. The key credit quality indicator for mortgage loans is payment status. Table 10.4 presents the recorded investment of mortgage loans based on payment status as well as other delinquency statistics.

Table 10.4 - Credit Quality Indicator and Other Delinquency Statistics of Mortgage Loans (dollars in thousands)
 December 31, 2019
Payment status:Conventional MPP Loans FHA Loans Total
Past due 30-59 days delinquent$35,416
 $13,903
 $49,319
Past due 60-89 days delinquent5,572
 3,052
 8,624
Past due 90 days or more delinquent12,421
 5,805
 18,226
Total past due53,409
 22,760
 76,169
Total current mortgage loans10,985,818
 210,732
 11,196,550
Total mortgage loans$11,039,227
 $233,492
 $11,272,719
Other delinquency statistics:     
In process of foreclosure, included above (1)
$8,311
 $2,515
 $10,826
Serious delinquency rate (2)
0.11% 2.49% 0.16%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (3)
$11,935
 $5,805
 $17,740
Loans on non-accrual status, included above$1,902
 $
 $1,902
      
 December 31, 2018
Payment status:Conventional MPP Loans FHA Loans Total
Past due 30-59 days delinquent$29,596
 $14,845
 $44,441
Past due 60-89 days delinquent7,175
 4,238
 11,413
Past due 90 days or more delinquent12,807
 7,210
 20,017
Total past due49,578
 26,293
 75,871
Total current mortgage loans10,210,145
 250,308
 10,460,453
Total mortgage loans$10,259,723
 $276,601
 $10,536,324
Other delinquency statistics:     
In process of foreclosure, included above (1)
$7,557
 $4,635
 $12,192
Serious delinquency rate (2)
0.13% 2.65% 0.19%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (3)
$11,773
 $7,210
 $18,983
Loans on non-accrual status, included above$2,535
 $
 $2,535
(1)Includes loans where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans dependent on their delinquency status.
(2)Loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure (including past due or current loans in the process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total loan portfolio class recorded investment amount.
(3)Each conventional loan past due 90 days or more still accruing interest is on a schedule/scheduled monthly settlement basis and contains one or more credit enhancements. Loans that are well secured and in the process of collection as a result of remaining credit enhancements and schedule/scheduled settlement are not placed on non-accrual status.

The FHLB did not have any real estate owned at December 31, 2019 or 2018.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. A troubled debt restructuring is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. The FHLB's troubled debt restructurings primarily involve loans where an agreement permits the recapitalization of past due amounts up to the original loan amount and certain loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. A loan considered a troubled debt restructuring is individually evaluated for impairment when determining its related allowance for credit losses. Credit losses are measured by estimating expected cash shortfalls incurred as of the reporting date.


The FHLB's recorded investment in modified loans considered troubled debt restructurings was (in thousands) $13,514 and $10,554 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The amount of troubled debt restructurings is not considered material to the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
December 31, 2019
Allowance for credit losses:
Collectively evaluated for impairment$711 
Individually evaluated for impairment
Total allowance for credit losses$711 
Recorded investment:
Collectively evaluated for impairment$11,025,713 
Individually evaluated for impairment13,514 
Total recorded investment$11,039,227 


Note 117 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Nature of Business Activity

The FHLB is exposed to interest rate risk primarily from the effect of interest rate changes on its interest-earning assets and on the interest-bearing liabilities that finance these assets. The goal of the FHLB's interest-rate risk management strategy is not to eliminate interest-rate risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits. To mitigate the risk of loss, the FHLB has established policies and procedures, which include guidelines on the amount of exposure to interest rate changes it is willing to accept. In addition, the FHLB monitors the risk to its interest income, net interest margin and average maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The FHLB uses derivatives when they are considered to be the most cost-effective alternative to achieve the FHLB's financial and risk management objectives.

The FHLB transacts its derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute Consolidated Obligations. Derivative transactions may be executed either with a counterparty, (uncleared derivatives)referred to as uncleared derivatives, or cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (i.e., clearing agent) with a Derivative Clearing Organization, (cleared derivatives).referred to as cleared derivatives. Once a derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing by a Derivative Clearing Organization (Clearinghouse), the executing counterparty is replaced with the Clearinghouse. The FHLB is not a derivative dealer and does not trade derivatives for short-term profit.

108

Table of Contents
Consistent with Finance Agency regulations, the FHLB enters into derivatives to manage the interest rate risk exposures inherent in otherwise unhedged assets and funding positions, to achieve the FHLB's risk management objectives and to act as an intermediary between its members and counterparties. The use of derivatives is an integral part of the FHLB's financial management strategy. However, Finance Agency regulations and the FHLB's financial management policy prohibit trading in, or the speculative use of, derivative instruments and limit credit risk arising from them.

The most common ways in which the FHLB uses derivatives are to:
reduce the interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
preserve a favorable interest rate spread between the yield of an asset (e.g., an Advance) and the cost of the related liability (e.g., the Consolidated Obligation used to fund the Advance);
manage embedded options in assets and liabilities;
reduce funding costs by combining a derivative with a Consolidated Obligation, as the cost of a combined funding structure can be lower than the cost of a comparable Consolidated Obligation; and
protect the value of existing asset or liability positions.
reduce the interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
preserve a favorable interest rate spread between the yield of an asset (e.g., an Advance) and the cost of the related liability (e.g., the Consolidated Obligation used to fund the Advance);
manage embedded options in assets and liabilities;
reduce funding costs by combining a derivative with a Consolidated Obligation, as the cost of a combined funding structure can be lower than the cost of a comparable Consolidated Obligation; and
protect the value of existing asset or liability positions.

Types of Derivatives

The FHLB primarily uses the following derivative instruments:

Interest rate swaps - An interest rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be exchanged and the manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. One of the simplest forms of an interest rate swap involves the promise by one party to pay cash flows equivalent to the interest on a notional principal amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a given period of time. In return for this promise, this party receives cash flows equivalent to the interest on the same notional principal amount at a variable-rate index for the same period of time. As of December 31, 2019,2020, the variable-ratevariable-rates transacted by the FHLB in its derivatives is either OIS, SOFR, or LIBOR.include the Federal Funds Overnight Index Swap (OIS), Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), and London InterBank Offering Rate (LIBOR).

Swaptions - A swaption is an option on a swap that gives the buyer the right to enter into a specified interest rate swap at a certain time in the future. The FHLB may enter into both payer swaptions and receiver swaptions. A payer swaption is the option to make fixed interest payments at a later date and a receiver swaption is the option to receive fixed interest payments at a later date.


Forwards Contracts - Forwards contracts gives the buyer the right to buy or sell a specific type of asset at a specific time at a given price. For example, certain mortgage purchase commitments entered into by the FHLB are considered derivatives. The FHLB may hedge these commitments by selling to-be-announced (TBA) mortgage-backed securities for forward settlement. A TBA represents a forward contract for the sale of mortgage-backed securities at a future agreed upon date for an established price.

Application of Derivatives

The FHLB documents at inception all relationships between derivatives designated as hedging instruments and the hedged items, its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions, and its method of assessing effectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges to assets and liabilities on the Statements of Condition.

The FHLB may use certain derivatives as fair value hedges of associated financial instruments. However, because the FHLB uses derivatives when they are considered to be the most cost-effective alternative to achieve the FHLB's financial and risk management objectives, it may enter into derivatives that do not necessarily qualify for hedge accounting (economic hedges). The FHLB re-evaluates its hedging strategies from time to time and may change the hedging techniques it uses or adopt new strategies.

109

Table of Contents
Types of Hedged Items

The types of assets and liabilities currently hedged with derivatives are:

Investments - The interest rate and prepayment risks associated with the FHLB's investment securities are managed through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The FHLB may manage the prepayment and interest rate risk by funding investment securities with Consolidated Obligations that have call features or by hedging these risks with interest rate swaps, caps or floors, or swaptions. The FHLB may also manage the risk arising from changing market prices and volatility of investment securities by entering into economic derivatives that generally offset the changes in fair value of the securities. Derivatives held by the FHLB that are associated with trading and held-to-maturity securities are designated as economic hedges, and derivatives specifically linked to individual available-for-sale securities may qualify as fair value hedges or be designated as economic hedges.

Advances - The FHLB offers a wide range of fixed- and variable-rate Advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics, and optionality. The FHLB may use derivatives to manage the repricing and/or option characteristics of Advances in order to more closely match the characteristics of the FHLB's funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed-rate Advance or a variable-rate Advance with embedded options, the FHLB may simultaneously execute a derivative with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the Advance. For example, the FHLB may hedge a fixed-rate Advance with an interest rate swap where the FHLB pays a fixed-rate and receives a variable-rate, effectively converting the fixed-rate Advance to a variable-rate Advance. These types of hedges are typically treated as fair value hedges.

When issuing a putable Advance, the FHLB effectively purchases a put option from the member that allows the FHLB to put or extinguish the fixed-rate Advance, which the FHLB normally would exercise when interest rates increase. The FHLB may hedge these Advances by entering into a cancelable derivative.

Mortgage Loans - The FHLB invests in fixed-rate mortgage loans. The prepayment options embedded in mortgage loans can result in extensions or contractions in the expected repayment of these investments, depending on changes in actual and estimated prepayment speeds. The FHLB may manage the interest rate and prepayment risks associated with mortgage loans through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The FHLB issues both callable and non-callable debt and prepayment linked Consolidated Obligations to achieve cash flow patterns and liability durations similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. The FHLB may purchase swaptions to minimize the prepayment risk embedded in mortgage loans. Although these derivatives are valid economic hedges against the prepayment risk of the loans, they are not specifically linked to individual loans and therefore do not receive fair value hedge accounting. These derivatives are marked-to-market through earnings.

Consolidated Obligations - The FHLB may enter into derivatives to hedge the interest rate risk associated with its debt issuances. The FHLB manages the risk arising from changing market prices and volatility of a Consolidated Obligation by matching the cash inflow on a derivative with the cash outflow on the Consolidated Obligation.

For example, fixed-rate Consolidated Obligations are issued and the FHLB may simultaneously enter into a matching interest rate swap in which the counterparty pays fixed cash flows to the FHLB designed to mirror in timing and amount the cash

outflows the FHLB pays on the Consolidated Obligation. The FHLB pays a variable cash flow that closely matches the interest payments it receives on short-term or variable-rate Advances. These transactions are treated as fair value hedges.

This strategy of issuing Consolidated Obligations while simultaneously entering into derivatives enables the FHLB to offer a wider range of attractively priced Advances to its members and may allow the FHLB to reduce its funding costs. The continued attractiveness of such debt depends on yield relationships between the FHLB's Consolidated Obligations and the derivative markets. If conditions in these markets change, the FHLB may alter the types or terms of the Consolidated Obligations.

Firm Commitments - Certain mortgage loan purchase commitments, such as mortgage delivery commitments, are considered derivatives. The FHLB may hedge these commitments by selling TBA mortgage-backed securities for forward settlement. The mortgage loan purchase commitment and the TBA used in the firm commitment hedging strategy are treated as an economic hedge and are marked-to-market through earnings. When the mortgage loan purchase commitment derivative settles, the current market value of the commitment is included in the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.

Financial Statement Effect and Additional Financial Information

The notional amount of derivatives serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. The notional amount reflects the FHLB's involvement in the various classes of financial instruments and represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the FHLB to credit and market risk; the overall risk is much smaller. The
110

Table of Contents
risks of derivatives only can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis that takes into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.


Table 11.17.1 summarizes the notional amount and fair value of derivative instruments and total derivative assets and liabilities. Total derivative assets and liabilities include the effect of netting adjustments and cash collateral. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and the related accrued interest.


Table 11.17.1 - Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (in thousands)
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020
Notional Amount of Derivatives Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities Notional Amount of DerivativesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:     Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:   
Interest rate swaps$9,310,089
 $7,227
 $53,641
Interest rate swaps$10,477,703 $272 $163,174 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Interest rate swaps28,501,469
 9,685
 363
Interest rate swaps13,267,539 691 2,563 
Interest rate swaptions6,000,000
 12,464
 
Interest rate swaptions2,175,000 713 
Forward rate agreements849,000
 21
 782
Mortgage delivery commitments936,269
 2,798
 64
Mortgage delivery commitments137,352 1,056 
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments36,286,738
 24,968
 1,209
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments15,579,891 2,460 2,563 
Total derivatives before adjustments$45,596,827
 32,195
 54,850
Total derivatives before adjustments$26,057,594 2,732 165,737 
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
  234,970
 (53,540)
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 213,156 (161,924)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities  $267,165
 $1,310
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities $215,888 $3,813 
     
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2019
Notional Amount of Derivatives Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities Notional Amount of DerivativesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:     Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:   
Interest rate swaps$6,207,278
 $2,393
 $16,810
Interest rate swaps$9,310,089 $7,227 $53,641 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps4,322,480
 3,311
 1,904
Interest rate swaps28,501,469 9,685 363 
Interest rate swaptions3,000,000
 15,911
 
Interest rate swaptions6,000,000 12,464 
Forward rate agreements131,000
 
 2,664
Forward rate agreements849,000 21 782 
Mortgage delivery commitments146,009
 1,726
 1
Mortgage delivery commitments936,269 2,798 64 
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments7,599,489
 20,948
 4,569
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments36,286,738 24,968 1,209 
Total derivatives before adjustments$13,806,767
 23,341
 21,379
Total derivatives before adjustments$45,596,827 32,195 54,850 
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
  42,424
 (16,793)
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 234,970 (53,540)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities  $65,765
 $4,586
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities $267,165 $1,310 
 
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. Cash collateral posted and related accrued interest was (in thousands) $293,148 and $71,246 at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Cash collateral received and related accrued interest was (in thousands) $4,638 and $12,029 at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral, including accrued interest, held or placed by the FHLB with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. Cash collateral posted, including accrued interest, was (in thousands) $375,390 and $293,148 at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Cash collateral received, including accrued interest, was (in thousands) $310 and $4,638 at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
In connection with
With the adoption of newthe hedge accounting guidance on January 1, 2019, changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk for designated fair value hedges are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item beginning on January 1, 2019.item. Prior to January 1, 2019, for designated fair value hedges, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedge item) was recorded in non-interest income (loss) as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities.

111

Table of Contents
Table 11.27.2 presents the impact of qualifying fair value hedging relationships on the Statements of Income as well as the total interest income (expense) by product.


Table 11.27.2 - Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships on the Statements of Income (in thousands)
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
AdvancesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesConsolidated Bonds
Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income$434,815 $4,782 $(541,996)
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships (1)
Interest income/expense:
Net interest settlements$(90,959)$(2,484)$1,652 
Gain (loss) on derivatives(263,046)(5,209)1,477 
Gain (loss) on hedged items247,059 4,826 (1,377)
Effect on net interest income$(106,946)$(2,867)$1,752 

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
 Advances Available-for-sale Securities Consolidated Bonds
Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income$1,195,128
 $27,691
 $(1,033,508)
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships on the Statements of Income (1)
     
Interest income/expense:     
Net interest settlements$36,052
 $(311) $1,637
Gain (loss) on derivatives(160,006) (6,402) 945
Gain (loss) on hedged items153,435
 6,307
 (905)
Effect on net interest income$29,481
 $(406) $1,677
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (2)
 Advances Available-for-sale securities Consolidated Bonds
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships on the Statements of Income (1)
     
Interest income/expense:     
Net interest settlements (3)
$24,006
 $(44) $(3,215)
Effect on net interest income$24,006
 $(44) $(3,215)
Non-interest income (loss):     
Gain (loss) on derivatives$(6,443) $(1,015) $2,758
Gain (loss) on hedged items8,517
 1,008
 (2,950)
Effect on non-interest income (loss)$2,074
 $(7) $(192)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
AdvancesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesConsolidated Bonds
Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income$1,195,128 $27,691 $(1,033,508)
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships (1)
Interest income/expense:
Net interest settlements$36,052 $(311)$1,637 
Gain (loss) on derivatives(160,006)(6,402)945 
Gain (loss) on hedged items153,435 6,307 (905)
Effect on net interest income$29,481 $(406)$1,677 
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 (2)
 Advances Consolidated Bonds
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships on the Statements of Income (1)
   
Interest income/expense:   
Net interest settlements (3)
$(17,907) $(1,101)
Effect on net interest income$(17,907) $(1,101)
Non-interest income (loss):   
Gain (loss) on derivatives$35,570
 $240
Gain (loss) on hedged items(36,152) 282
Effect on non-interest income (loss)$(582) $522

(1)Includes interest rate swaps.
(2)Prior period amounts were not conformed to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
(3)Excludes (amortization)/accretion on closed fair value hedge relationships of (in thousands) $(602) and $(2,131) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.


 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (2)
AdvancesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesConsolidated Bonds
Impact of Fair Value Hedging Relationships (1)
Interest income/expense:
Net interest settlements (3)
$24,006 $(44)$(3,215)
Effect on net interest income$24,006 $(44)$(3,215)
Non-interest income (loss):
Gain (loss) on derivatives$(6,443)$(1,015)$2,758 
Gain (loss) on hedged items8,517 1,008 (2,950)
Effect on non-interest income (loss)$2,074 $(7)$(192)
(1)     Includes interest rate swaps.
(2)    Prior period amounts were not conformed to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
(3)    Excludes (amortization)/accretion on closed fair value hedge relationships of (in thousands) $(602) for the year ended December 31, 2018.

112

Table of Contents
Table 11.37.3 presents the cumulative basis adjustments on hedged items designated as fair value hedges and the related amortized cost of the hedged items.

Table 11.37.3 - Cumulative Basis Adjustments for Fair Value Hedges (in thousands)
December 31, 2020
AdvancesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesConsolidated Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged asset or liability (1)
$10,483,218 $286,869 $132,852 
Fair value hedging adjustments
Basis adjustments for active hedging relationships included in amortized cost$356,624 $11,751 $2,086 
Basis adjustments for discontinued hedging relationships included in amortized cost1,549 389 
Total amount of fair value hedging basis adjustments$358,173 $12,140 $2,086 
December 31, 2019
AdvancesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesConsolidated Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged asset or liability (1)
$9,160,841 $131,814 $210,696 
Fair value hedging adjustments
Basis adjustments for active hedging relationships included in amortized cost$109,078 $7,314 $708 
Basis adjustments for discontinued hedging relationships included in amortized cost851 
Total amount of fair value hedging basis adjustments$109,929 $7,314 $708 
(1)     Includes only the portion of amortized cost representing the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships.

  December 31, 2019
Hedged Item 
Amortized Cost of Hedged Asset/ Liability (1)
 Basis Adjustment for Active Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost Basis Adjustments for Discontinued Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments
Advances $9,160,841
 $109,078
 $851
 $109,929
Available-for-sale securities 131,814
 7,314
 
 7,314
Consolidated Bonds 210,696
 708
 
 708
(1)Includes only the portion of amortized cost representing the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships.

Table 11.47.4 presents net gains (losses) related to derivatives and hedging activities recorded in non-interest income (loss). on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments. For fair value hedging relationships, the portion of net gains (losses) representing hedge ineffectiveness were recorded in non-interest income (loss) for periods prior to January 1, 2019.


Table 11.47.4 - Net Gains (Losses) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities Recorded in Non-interest Income (Loss) (in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate swapsN/AN/A$1,875 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps$(227,781)$(142,193)10,722 
Interest rate swaptions90,594 (19,019)(5,725)
Forward rate agreements(31,935)(10,619)4,446 
Net interest settlements(127,098)(24,363)(46,093)
Mortgage delivery commitments21,549 14,904 (5,349)
Total net gains (losses) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(274,671)(181,290)(41,999)
Price alignment amount (1)
1,418 3,378 (274)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities$(273,253)$(177,912)$(40,398)
(1)    This amount is for derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as a daily settled contract.

113

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging relationships:     
Interest rate swapsN/A
 $1,875
 $(60)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     
Economic hedges:     
Interest rate swaps$(142,193) 10,722
 (4,067)
Interest rate swaptions(19,019) (5,725) (17,016)
Forward rate agreements(10,619) 4,446
 (6,054)
Net interest settlements(24,363) (46,093) (8,298)
Mortgage delivery commitments14,904
 (5,349) 10,424
Total net gains (losses) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(181,290) (41,999) (25,011)
Price alignment amount (1)
3,378
 (274) 607
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities$(177,912) $(40,398) $(24,464)
Table of Contents
(1)This amount is for derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as a daily settled contract.

Credit Risk on Derivatives

The FHLB is subject to credit risk due to the risk of non-performance by counterparties to its derivative transactions, and manages credit risk through credit analysis, collateral requirements and adherence to the requirements set forth in its policies, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations, and Finance Agency regulations.

For uncleared derivatives, the degree of credit risk depends on the extent to which master netting arrangements are included in these contracts to mitigate the risk. The FHLB requires collateral agreements on its uncleared derivatives with the collateral delivery threshold set to zero.

For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse is the FHLB's counterparty. The Clearinghouse notifies the clearing agent of the required initial and variation margin and the clearing agent in turn notifies the FHLB. The FHLB utilizes two Clearinghouses for all cleared derivative transactions, LCH Ltd. and CME Clearing. At both Clearinghouses, variation margin is characterized

as daily settlement payments, while initial margin is considered to be collateral. The requirement that the FHLB post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, to the Clearinghouse, exposes the FHLB to credit risk if the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives is intended to mitigate credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and collateral/payments for changes in the value of cleared derivatives is posted daily through a clearing agent. On the Statements of Cash Flows, the variation margin cash payments, or daily settlement payments, are included in net change in derivative and hedging activities, as an operating activity.

For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse determines initial margin requirements and generally credit ratings are not factored into the initial margin. However, clearing agents may require additional initial margin to be posted based on credit considerations, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades. At December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB was not required to post additional initial margin by its clearing agents based on credit considerations.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities

The FHLB presents derivative instruments, related cash collateral received or pledged, and associated accrued interest, on a net basis by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when it has met the netting requirements.

The FHLB has analyzed the enforceability of offsetting rights incorporated in its cleared derivative transactions, and it expects that the exercise of those offsetting rights by a non-defaulting party under these transactions would be upheld under applicable law upon an event of default including bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar proceeding involving the Clearinghouse or the FHLB's clearing agent, or both. Based on this analysis, the FHLB presents a net derivative receivable or payable for all of its transactions through a particular clearing agent with a particular Clearinghouse.


114

Table of Contents
Table 11.57.5 presents separately the fair value of derivative instruments meeting or not meeting netting requirements, including the related collateral. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the FHLB did not receive or pledge any non-cash collateral. Any over-collateralization under an individual clearing agent and/or counterparty level is not included in the determination of the net unsecured amount.


Table 11.57.5 - Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities (in thousands)
 December 31, 2019
 Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements    
 Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral 
Derivative Instruments Not Meeting Netting Requirements (1)
 Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Assets:       
Uncleared$16,637
 $(13,903) $2,819
 $5,553
Cleared12,739
 248,873
 
 261,612
Total
 

 

 $267,165
Derivative Liabilities:       
Uncleared$53,533
 $(53,069) $846
 $1,310
Cleared471
 (471) 
 
Total
 

 

 $1,310
        
 December 31, 2018
 Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements    
 Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral 
Derivative Instruments Not Meeting Netting Requirements (1)
 Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Assets:       
Uncleared$20,284
 $(20,250) $1,726
 $1,760
Cleared1,331
 62,674
 
 64,005
Total
 
 
 $65,765
Derivative Liabilities:       
Uncleared$13,745
 $(11,824) $2,665
 $4,586
Cleared4,969
 (4,969) 
 
Total
 
 
 $4,586

(1)Represents mortgage delivery commitments and forward rate agreements that are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement.

December 31, 2020
Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements
Gross Recognized AmountGross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral
Derivative Instruments Not Meeting Netting Requirements (1)
Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Assets:
Uncleared$1,047 $(1,047)$1,056 $1,056 
Cleared629 214,203 214,832 
Total$215,888 
Derivative Liabilities:
Uncleared$161,633 $(157,820)$$3,813 
Cleared4,104 (4,104)
Total$3,813 
December 31, 2019
Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements
Gross Recognized AmountGross Amount of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral
Derivative Instruments Not Meeting Netting Requirements (1)
Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Assets:
Uncleared$16,637 $(13,903)$2,819 $5,553 
Cleared12,739 248,873 261,612 
Total$267,165 
Derivative Liabilities:
Uncleared$53,533 $(53,069)$846 $1,310 
Cleared471 (471)
Total$1,310 
(1)    Represents mortgage delivery commitments and forward rate agreements that are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement.


Note 128 - Deposits

The FHLB offers demand and overnight deposits to members and to qualifying nonmembers. In addition, the FHLB offers short-term interest-bearing deposit programs to members, and in certain cases, to qualifying nonmembers. A member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds collected in connection with the mortgage loans at the FHLB, pending disbursement of such funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. The FHLB classifies these funds as other interest-bearing deposits. Deposits classified as demand, overnight, and other pay interest based on a daily interest rate. Term deposits pay interest based on a fixed rate determined at the issuance of the deposit.

Certain financial institutions have agreed to maintain compensating balances in consideration for correspondent and other non-credit services. These balances are included in interest-bearing deposits on the accompanying financial statements. The compensating balances required to be held by the FHLB averaged (in thousands) $271,195 and $6,178 during 2020 and $8,343 during 2019 and 2018.2019.

115

Table of Contents

Non-interest bearing deposits represent funds for which the FHLB acts as a pass-through correspondent for member institutions required to deposit reserves with the Federal Reserve Banks.

Table 12.18.1 - Deposits (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Interest-bearing:   
Demand and overnight$1,190,508  $906,028 
Term123,675  27,850 
Other13,019  7,179 
Total interest-bearing1,327,202  941,057 
Non-interest bearing:   
Other 10,239 
Total non-interest bearing 10,239 
Total deposits$1,327,202  $951,296 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Interest-bearing:   
Demand and overnight$906,028
 $605,979
Term27,850
 51,600
Other7,179
 4,959
Total interest-bearing941,057
 662,538
Non-interest bearing:   
Other10,239
 6,478
Total non-interest bearing10,239
 6,478
Total deposits$951,296
 $669,016



Note 139 - Consolidated Obligations

Consolidated Obligations consist of Consolidated Bonds and Discount Notes. The FHLBanks issue Consolidated Obligations through the Office of Finance as their agent. In connection with each debt issuance, each FHLBank specifies the amount of debt it wants issued on its behalf. The Office of Finance tracks the amount of debt issued on behalf of each FHLBank. In addition, the FHLBank records as a liability its specific portion of Consolidated Obligations for which it is the primary obligor.

The Finance Agency and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury oversee the issuance of FHLBank debt through the Office of Finance. Consolidated Bonds may be issued to raise short-, intermediate-, and long-term funds for the FHLBanks and are not subject to any statutory or regulatory limits on maturity. Consolidated Discount Notes are issued primarily to raise short-term funds and have original maturities up to one year. These notes generally sell at less than their face amount and are redeemed at par value when they mature.

Although the FHLB is primarily liable for its portion of Consolidated Obligations, the FHLB is also jointly and severally liable with the other 10 FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Consolidated Obligations of each of the other FHLBanks. The Finance Agency, at its discretion, may require any FHLBank to make principal or interest payments due on any Consolidated Obligation whether or not the Consolidated Obligation represents a primary liability of such FHLBank. Although an FHLBank has never paid the principal or interest payments due on a Consolidated Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, if that event should occur, Finance Agency regulations provide that the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement from the FHLBank that is primarily liable for that Consolidated Obligation for any payments and other associated costs, including interest to be determined by the Finance Agency. If, however, that FHLBank is unable to satisfy its repayment obligations, the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liabilities of that FHLBank among the remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank's participation in all Consolidated Obligations outstanding or in any other manner it may determine to ensure that the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner.

116

Table of Contents


The par values of the 11 FHLBanks' outstanding Consolidated Obligations were approximately $1,025.9$746.8 billion and $1,031.6$1,025.9 billion at December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. Finance Agency regulations require the FHLB to maintain unpledged qualifying assets equal to its participation in the Consolidated Obligations outstanding. Qualifying assets are defined as cash; secured Advances; obligations of or fully guaranteed by the United States; and investments (i.e., obligations, participations or other instruments of or issued by Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae; mortgages,mortgage, obligations, or other securities which are or ever have been sold by Freddie Mac under the FHLBank Act;Mac; and such securities as fiduciary and trust funds may invest in under the laws of the state in which the FHLB is located.located). Any assets subject to a lien or pledge for the benefit of holders of any issue of Consolidated Obligations are treated as if they were free from lien or pledge for purposes of compliance with these regulations.

Table 13.19.1 - Consolidated Discount Notes Outstanding (dollars in thousands)
 Book Value Principal Amount 
Weighted Average Interest Rate (1)
December 31, 2020$27,500,244  $27,502,730  0.11 %
December 31, 2019$49,084,219  $49,176,985  1.56 %
 Book Value Principal Amount 
Weighted Average Interest Rate (1)
December 31, 2019$49,084,219
 $49,176,985
 1.56%
December 31, 2018$46,943,632
 $47,071,113
 2.35%
(1)Represents an implied rate without consideration of concessions.
(1)Represents an implied rate without consideration of concessions.

Table 13.29.2 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Original Contractual Maturity (dollars in thousands)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Year of Original Contractual MaturityAmountWeighted Average Interest Rate AmountWeighted Average Interest Rate
Due in 1 year or less$18,676,595 0.72 % $18,259,565 1.77 %
Due after 1 year through 2 years2,728,885 2.38  8,293,595 1.96 
Due after 2 years through 3 years3,388,120 2.09  3,024,885 2.41 
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,793,405 2.21  3,123,120 2.62 
Due after 4 years through 5 years1,910,000 1.45  1,540,405 2.73 
Thereafter3,454,000 2.39  4,139,000 2.97 
Total principal amount31,951,005 1.32  38,380,570 2.10 
Premiums43,235   64,604  
Discounts(21,403)  (24,335) 
Hedging adjustments2,086   708  
Fair value option valuation adjustment and accrued interest21,388 18,177 
Total$31,996,311   $38,439,724  
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Year of Original Contractual Maturity Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate
Due in 1 year or less $18,259,565
 1.77% $21,085,800
 2.20%
Due after 1 year through 2 years 8,293,595
 1.96
 6,998,565
 2.13
Due after 2 years through 3 years 3,024,885
 2.41
 6,829,595
 2.05
Due after 3 years through 4 years 3,123,120
 2.62
 2,958,620
 2.39
Due after 4 years through 5 years 1,540,405
 2.73
 3,248,975
 2.63
Thereafter 4,139,000
 2.97
 4,525,635
 2.94
Total principal amount 38,380,570
 2.10
 45,647,190
 2.29
Premiums 64,604
   75,809
  
Discounts (24,335)   (29,275)  
Hedging adjustments 708
   (196)  
Fair value option valuation adjustment and
   accrued interest
 18,177
   (34,390)  
Total $38,439,724
   $45,659,138
  


Consolidated Bonds outstanding were issued with either fixed-rate coupon payment terms or variable-rate coupon payment terms that are indexed to either LIBORthe SOFR or the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.LIBOR. To meet the expected specific needs of certain investors in Consolidated Obligations, both fixed-rate Bonds and variable-rate Bonds may contain features that result in complex coupon payment terms and call options. When these Consolidated Bonds are issued, the FHLB may enter into derivatives containing features that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the Consolidated Bonds.

Table 13.39.3 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Call Features (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Principal Amount of Consolidated Bonds:   
Non-callable$26,539,005  $32,953,570 
Callable5,412,000  5,427,000 
Total principal amount$31,951,005  $38,380,570 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Principal Amount of Consolidated Bonds:   
Non-callable$32,953,570
 $38,539,190
Callable5,427,000
 7,108,000
Total principal amount$38,380,570
 $45,647,190
117


Table of Contents


Table 13.49.4 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Original Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date (in thousands)
Year of Original Contractual Maturity or Next Call DateDecember 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Due in 1 year or less$22,968,595  $22,631,565 
Due after 1 year through 2 years2,823,885  7,130,595 
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,452,120  2,662,885 
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,253,405  2,343,120 
Due after 4 years through 5 years728,000  1,253,405 
Thereafter1,725,000  2,359,000 
Total principal amount$31,951,005  $38,380,570 
Year of Original Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Due in 1 year or less $22,631,565
 $27,173,800
Due after 1 year through 2 years 7,130,595
 5,773,565
Due after 2 years through 3 years 2,662,885
 5,060,595
Due after 3 years through 4 years 2,343,120
 2,470,620
Due after 4 years through 5 years 1,253,405
 2,231,975
Thereafter 2,359,000
 2,936,635
Total principal amount $38,380,570
 $45,647,190


Consolidated Bonds, beyond having fixed-rate or variable-rate interest-rate payment terms, may also have a step-up interest-rate payment type. Step-up bonds pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the Consolidated Bond. These Consolidated Bonds generally contain provisions enabling the FHLB to call the Consolidated Bonds at its option on the step-up dates.

Table 13.59.5 - Consolidated Bonds by Interest-rate Payment Type (in thousands)
 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Principal Amount of Consolidated Bonds:   
Fixed-rate$21,312,005  $27,368,570 
Variable-rate10,639,000 11,012,000 
Total principal amount$31,951,005 $38,380,570 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Principal Amount of Consolidated Bonds:   
Fixed-rate$27,368,570
 $29,837,190
Variable-rate11,012,000
 15,470,000
Step-up
 340,000
Total principal amount$38,380,570
 $45,647,190



Note 1410 - Affordable Housing Program (AHP)

The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish an AHP. Each FHLBank provides subsidies in the form of direct grants and below-market interest rate AHP Advances to members who use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Each FHLBank is required to contribute to its AHP the greater of 10 percent of its previous year's income subject to assessment, or the prorated sum required to ensure the aggregate contribution by the FHLBanks is no less than $100 million for each year. For purposes of the AHP calculation, income subject to assessment is defined as net income before assessments, plus interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The FHLB accrues AHP expense monthly based on its income subject to assessment. The FHLB reduces the AHP liability as members use subsidies.

If the FHLB experienced a net loss during a quarter, but still had income subject to assessment for the year, the FHLB's obligation to the AHP would be calculated based on the FHLB's year-to-date income subject to assessment. If the FHLB had income subject to assessment in subsequent quarters, it would be required to contribute additional amounts to meet its calculated annual obligation. If the FHLB experienced a net loss for a full year, the FHLB would have no obligation to the AHP for the year, because each FHLBank's required annual AHP contribution is limited to its annual income subject to assessment. If the aggregate 10 percent calculation described above was less than $100 million for the FHLBanks, each FHLBank would be required to contribute a prorated sum to ensure that the aggregate contributions by the FHLBanks equaled $100 million. The proration would be made on the basis of an FHLBank's income in relation to the income of all FHLBanks for the previous year.

There was no shortfall, as described above, in 2020, 2019, 2018, or 2017.2018. If an FHLBank finds that its required AHP obligations are contributing to its financial instability, it may apply to the Finance Agency for a temporary suspension of its contributions. The FHLB has never made such an application.


Table 14.110.1 - Analysis of AHP Liability (in thousands)
20202019
Balance at beginning of year$115,295 $117,336 
Assessments (current year additions)30,826 30,801 
Subsidy uses, net(35,349)(32,842)
Balance at end of year$110,772 $115,295 
 2019 2018
Balance at beginning of year$117,336
 $109,877
Assessments (current year additions)30,801
 37,884
Subsidy uses, net(32,842) (30,425)
Balance at end of year$115,295
 $117,336
118

Table of Contents



Note 11 - Capital
Note 15
- Capital

The FHLB is subject to three capital requirements under its Capital Plan and the Finance Agency rules and regulations. Regulatory capital does not include accumulated other comprehensive income, but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

1.
1.     Risk-based capital. The FHLB must maintain at all times permanent capital, defined as Class B stock and retained earnings, in an amount at least equal to the sum of its credit risk, market risk, and operations risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency.

2.     Total regulatory capital. The FHLB must maintain at all times a total regulatory capital-to-assets ratio of at least four percent. Total regulatory capital is the sum of permanent capital, Class A stock, any general loss allowance, if consistent with GAAP and not established for specific assets, and other amounts from sources determined by the Finance Agency as available to absorb losses.

3.     Leverage capital. The FHLB must maintain at all times a leverage capital-to-assets ratio of at least five percent. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and all other capital without a weighting factor.

The FHLB must maintain at all times permanent capital, defined as Class B stock and retained earnings, in an amount at least equal to the sum of its credit risk, market risk, and operations risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency.

2.
Total regulatory capital. The FHLB must maintain at all times a total regulatory capital-to-assets ratio of at least four percent. Total regulatory capital is the sum of permanent capital, Class A stock, any general loss allowance, if consistent with GAAP and not established for specific assets, and other amounts from sources determined by the Finance Agency as available to absorb losses.

3.
Leverage capital. The FHLB must maintain at all times a leverage capital-to-assets ratio of at least five percent. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and all other capital without a weighting factor.

The Finance Agency may require the FHLB to maintain greater permanent capital than is required based on Finance Agency rules and regulations.

At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the FHLB was in compliance with each of these capital requirements.

Table 15.111.1 - Capital Requirements (dollars in thousands)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Minimum RequirementActualMinimum RequirementActual
Risk-based capital$539,321 $3,964,353 $820,635 $4,482,519 
Capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)4.00 %6.07 %4.00 %4.79 %
Regulatory capital$2,611,850 $3,964,353 $3,739,662 $4,482,519 
Leverage capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)5.00 %9.11 %5.00 %7.19 %
Leverage capital$3,264,812 $5,946,530 $4,674,578 $6,723,779 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Minimum Requirement Actual Minimum Requirement Actual
Risk-based capital$820,635
 $4,482,519
 $837,666
 $5,366,443
Capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)4.00% 4.79% 4.00% 5.41%
Regulatory capital$3,739,662
 $4,482,519
 $3,968,103
 $5,366,443
Leverage capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)5.00% 7.19% 5.00% 8.11%
Leverage capital$4,674,578
 $6,723,779
 $4,960,129
 $8,049,665


The FHLB currently offers only Class B stock, which is issued and redeemed at a par value of $100 per share. Class B stock may be issued to meet membership and activity stock purchase requirements, to pay dividends, and to pay interest on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. Membership stock is required to become a member of and maintain membership in the FHLB. The membership stock requirement is based upon a percentage of the member's total assets. At December 31, 2019,2020, the membership stock requirement was determined within a declining range from 0.16 percent to 0.05 percent of each member's total assets, with a minimum of $1 thousand and a maximum of $30 million for each member. In addition to membership stock, a member may be required to hold activity stock to capitalize its Mission Asset Activity with the FHLB.

Mission Asset Activity includes Advances, certain funds and rate Advance commitments, Letters of Credit, and MPP activity that occurred after implementation of the Capital Plan on December 30, 2002. Members must maintain an activity stock balance at leastwithin a range of minimum and maximum activity stock capitalization percentages, which were set to equal each other as of January 1, 2021 and are as follows: 3.00 percent for MPP, 4.50 percent for Advances and Advance commitments, and 0.10 percent for Letters of Credit. During 2020 and 2019, members were required to themaintain minimum and maximum activity allocation percentage, which currently isstock capitalization percentages of 0 percent and 4.00 percent for the MPP and 22.00 percent and 4.00 percent for all other Mission

Asset Activity.Advances and Advance commitments. Prior to January 1, 2021, members were not required to capitalize Letters of Credit. If a member owns more than the maximumits required activity allocationstock percentage, which currently is 4 percent of all Mission Asset Activity, the additional stock is that member's excess stock. The FHLB's unrestricted excess stock is defined as total Class B stock minus membership stock, activity stock calculated at the maximum allocation percentage, shares reserved for exclusive use after a stock dividend, and shares subject to redemption and withdrawal notices. The FHLB's excess stock may normally be used by members to support a portion of their activity stock requirement as long as those members maintain at least their minimum activity stock allocation percentage.

119

Table of Contents
A member may request redemption of all or part of its Class B stock or may withdraw from membership by giving five years' advance written notice. When the FHLB repurchases capital stock, it must first repurchase shares for which a redemption or withdrawal notice's five-year redemption period or withdrawal period has expired. Since its Capital Plan was implemented, the FHLB has repurchased, at its discretion, all member shares subject to outstanding redemption notices prior to the expiration of the five-year redemption period.

Any member that has withdrawn from membership may not be readmitted to membership in any FHLBank until five years from the divestiture date for all capital stock that was held as a condition of membership, unless the institution has canceled its notice of withdrawal prior to the divestiture date. This restriction does not apply if the member is transferring its membership from one FHLBank to another on an uninterrupted basis.

Each class of FHLB stock is considered putable by the member and the FHLB may repurchase, in its sole discretion, any member's stock investments that exceed the required minimum amount. However, there are significant statutory and regulatory restrictions on the obligation to redeem, or right to repurchase, the outstanding stock. As a result, whether or not a member may have its capital stock in the FHLB repurchased (at the FHLB's discretion at any time before the end of the redemption period) or redeemed (at a member's request, completed at the end of a redemption period) will depend on whether the FHLB is in compliance with those restrictions.

The FHLB's retained earnings are owned proportionately by the current holders of Class B stock. The holders' interest in the retained earnings is realized at the time the FHLB periodically declares dividends or at such time as the FHLB is liquidated. The FHLB's Board of Directors may declare and pay dividends in either cash or capital stock, assuming the FHLB is in compliance with Finance Agency rules and regulations.

Restricted Retained Earnings. The Capital Agreement is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. The Capital Agreement provides that each FHLBank contributeswill, on a quarterly basis, allocate 20 percent of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding Consolidated Obligations for the previouscalendar quarter. These restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends but are available to absorb unexpected losses, if any, that an FHLBank may experience. At December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 the FHLB had (in thousands) $446,048$501,321 and $390,829$446,048 in restricted retained earnings.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The FHLB is a cooperative whose members own most of the FHLB's capital stock. Former members (including certain nonmembers that own the FHLB's capital stock as a result of a merger or acquisition, relocation, charter termination, or involuntary termination of an FHLB member) own the remaining capital stock to support business transactions still carried on the FHLB's Statements of Condition. Member shares cannot be purchased or sold except between the FHLB and its members at its $100 per share par value, as mandated by the FHLB's Capital Plan. The FHLB reclassifies stock subject to redemption from equity to liability upon expiration of the “grace period” after a member submits a written redemption request or withdrawal notice, or when the member attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, relocation, charter termination, or involuntary termination of membership. A member may cancel or revoke its written redemption request or its withdrawal notice prior to the end of the five-year redemption period. Under the FHLB's Capital Plan, there is a five calendar day “grace period” for revocation of a redemption request and a 30 calendar day “grace period” for revocation of a withdrawal notice during which the member may cancel the redemption request or withdrawal notice without a penalty or fee. The cancellation fee after the “grace period” is currently two percent of the requested amount in the first year and increases one percent a year until it reaches a maximum of six percent in the fifth year. The cancellation fee can be waived by the FHLB's Board of Directors for a bona fide business purpose.

Stock subject to a redemption or withdrawal notice that is within the “grace period” continues to be considered equity because there is no penalty or fee to retract these notices. Expiration of the “grace period” triggers the reclassification from equity to a liability (mandatorily redeemable capital stock) at fair value because after the “grace period” the penalty to retract these notices is considered substantive. If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the FHLB will reclassify mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to equity. Dividends related to capital stock classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reported as interest expense in the Statements of Income. For the years

ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018 dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock (in thousands) of $1,068, $1,113 $1,806 and $2,514$1,806 were recorded as interest expense.


120

Table of Contents
Table 15.211.2 - Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock Rollforward (in thousands)
202020192018
Balance, beginning of year$21,669 $23,184 $30,031 
Capital stock subject to mandatory redemption reclassified from equity560,779 8,269 68,185 
Capital stock previously subject to mandatory redemption reclassified to capital(123)(1,020)(5,599)
Repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(562,871)(8,764)(69,433)
Balance, end of year$19,454 $21,669 $23,184 
 201920182017
Balance, beginning of year$23,184
$30,031
$34,782
Capital stock subject to mandatory redemption reclassified from equity8,269
68,185
270,458
Capital stock previously subject to mandatory redemption reclassified to capital(1,020)(5,599)
Repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(8,764)(69,433)(275,209)
Balance, end of year$21,669
$23,184
$30,031


The number of stockholders holding the mandatorily redeemable capital stock was 24, 28 25 and 2625 at December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017.2018.

As of December 31, 20192020 there were no members or former members that had requested redemptions of capital stock whose stock had not been reclassified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock because the “grace periods” had not yet expired on these requests.

Table 15.311.3 shows the amount of mandatorily redeemable capital stock by contractual year of redemption. The year of redemption in the table is the end of the five-year redemption period. Consistent with the Capital Plan currently in effect, the FHLB is not required to redeem membership stock until five years after either (i) the membership is terminated or (ii) the FHLB receives notice of withdrawal. The FHLB is not required to redeem activity-based stock until the later of the expiration of the notice of redemption or until the activity to which the capital stock relates no longer remains outstanding. If activity-based stock becomes excess stock as a result of an activity no longer remaining outstanding, the FHLB may repurchase such shares, in its sole discretion, subject to the statutory and regulatory restrictions on capital stock redemption.

Table 15.311.3 - Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock by Contractual Year of Redemption (in thousands)

Contractual Year of RedemptionDecember 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Year 1$156  $371 
Year 2 1,124  298 
Year 32,167  1,129 
Year 4 391  2,955 
Year 5 3,142  1,931 
Thereafter (1)
650 650 
Past contractual redemption date due to remaining activity (2)
11,824 14,335 
Total$19,454  $21,669 
(1)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock resulting from a Finance Agency rule effective February 19, 2016, that made captive insurance companies ineligible for FHLB membership. Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLB members prior to September 12, 2014, had their membership terminated no later than February 19, 2021. The related mandatorily redeemable capital stock is not required to be redeemed until five years after the member's termination.
(2)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because there is activity outstanding to which the mandatorily redeemable capital stock relates.
121

Table of Contents
Contractual Year of Redemption December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Year 1 $371
 $1,633
Year 2  298
 371
Year 3 1,129
 357
Year 4  2,955
 1,209
Year 5  1,931
 3,553
Thereafter (1)
 650
 624
Past contractual redemption date due to remaining activity (2)
 14,335
 15,437
Total $21,669
 $23,184
(1)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock resulting from a Finance Agency rule effective February 19, 2016, that made captive insurance companies ineligible for FHLB membership. Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLB members prior to September 12, 2014, will have their membership terminated no later than February 19, 2021. Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLB members on or after September 12, 2014, had their membership terminated no later than February 19, 2017. The related mandatorily redeemable capital stock is not required to be redeemed until five years after the member's termination.
(2)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because there is activity outstanding to which the mandatorily redeemable capital stock relates.

Excess Capital Stock. Finance Agency regulations limit the ability of an FHLBank to create member excess stock under certain circumstances. The FHLB may not pay dividends in the form of capital stock or issue new excess stock to members if its excess stock exceeds one percent of its total assets or if the issuance of excess stock would cause the FHLB's excess stock to exceed one percent of its total assets. At December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB had excess capital stock outstanding totaling less than one percent of its total assets. At December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB was in compliance with the Finance Agency's excess stock rules.


Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation. The Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 was enacted in August 1987, which, among other things, provided for the recapitalization of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation through a newly-chartered entity, the Financing Corporation (FICO). The capitalization of FICO was provided by capital distributions from the FHLBanks to FICO in exchange for FICO nonvoting capital stock. Capital distributions were made by the FHLBanks in 1987, 1988 and 1989 that aggregated to $680 million. Upon passage of Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, the FHLBanks’ previous investment in capital stock of FICO was determined to be non-redeemable and the FHLBanks charged their prior capital distributions to FICO directly against retained earnings.

In accordance with the dissolution of FICO in 2020, FICO determined that excess funds aggregating to $200 million were available for distribution to its stockholders, the FHLBanks. Specifically, the FHLB’s partial recovery of prior capital distribution was $16.5 million, which was determined based on its share of the $680 million originally contributed. The FHLB treated the receipt of these funds as a return of the investment in FICO capital stock, and therefore as a partial recovery of the prior capital distributions made by the FHLBanks to FICO in 1987, 1988, and 1989. These funds have been credited to unrestricted retained earnings.
122

Table of Contents
Note 1612 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following tables summarize the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017.2018.

Table 16.112.1 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities Pension and postretirement benefits Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securitiesPension and postretirement benefitsTotal accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016$23
 $(13,279) $(13,256)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:     
Net unrealized gains (losses)(147) 
 (147)
Net actuarial gains (losses)
 (4,964) (4,964)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:     
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits
 1,707
 1,707
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)(147) (3,257) (3,404)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017(124) (16,536) (16,660)BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017$(124)$(16,536)$(16,660)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:     Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized gains (losses)14
 
 14
Net unrealized gains (losses)14 14 
Net actuarial gains (losses)
 1,403
 1,403
Net actuarial gains (losses)1,403 1,403 
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:     Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits
 2,200
 2,200
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits2,200 2,200 
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)14
 3,603
 3,617
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)14 3,603 3,617 
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018(110) (12,933) (13,043)BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018(110)(12,933)(13,043)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:     Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized gains (losses)480
 
 480
Net unrealized gains (losses)480 0480 
Net actuarial gains (losses)
 (5,665) (5,665)Net actuarial gains (losses)0(5,665)(5,665)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:     Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits
 1,834
 1,834
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits01,834 1,834 
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)480
 (3,831) (3,351)Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)480 (3,831)(3,351)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019$370
 $(16,764) $(16,394)BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019370 (16,764)(16,394)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized gains (losses)Net unrealized gains (losses)4,348 4,348 
Net actuarial gains (losses)Net actuarial gains (losses)(5,227)(5,227)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefitsAmortization - pension and postretirement benefits2,288 2,288 
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)4,348 (2,939)1,409 
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2020BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2020$4,718 $(19,703)$(14,985)


Note 1713 - Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

Qualified Defined Benefit Multi-employer Plan. The FHLB participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan), a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan is treated as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes, but operates as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, certain multi-employer plan disclosures, including the certified zone status, are not applicable to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan. Under the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan, contributions made by one participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers because assets contributed by an employer are not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits only to employees of that employer. Also, in the event a participating employer is unable to meet its contribution requirements, the required contributions for the other participating employers could increase proportionately. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan covers all officers and employees of the FHLB who meet certain eligibility requirements.

The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan operates on a plan year from July 1 through June 30. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan files one Form 5500 on behalf of all employers who participate in the plan. The Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the three-digit plan number is 333. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place at the FHLB.

123

Table of Contents

The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan's annual valuation process includes calculating the plan's funded status and separately calculating the funded status of each participating employer. The funded status is defined as the market value of assets divided by the funding target (100 percent of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued at that date). As permitted by ERISA, the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan accepts contributions for the prior plan year up to eight and a half months after the end of the prior plan year. As a result, the market value of assets at the valuation date (July 1) will increase by any subsequent contributions designated for the immediately preceding plan year ended June 30.

The most recent Form 5500 available for the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan is for the year ended June 30, 2018.2019. The FHLB did not contribute more than five percent of the total contributions to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for the plan years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The FHLB contributed more than five percent of the total contributions to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for the plan year ended June 30, 2016.

Table 17.113.1 - Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan Net Pension Cost and Funded Status (dollars in thousands)
202020192018
Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefit expense for the year ended December 31$6,429 $6,973 $8,988 
Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan funded status as of July 1108.20 %(a)108.62 %(b)110.96 %
FHLB's funded status as of July 1122.36 %125.76 %124.65 %
 2019 2018 2017
Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefit expense for
       the year ended December 31
$6,973
 $8,988
 $8,340
Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan funded status as of July 1108.59%
(a) 
110.96%
(b) 
111.75%
FHLB's funded status as of July 1125.76% 124.65% 124.35%
(a)    The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan's funded status as of July 1, 2020 is preliminary and may increase because the plan's participants were permitted to make contributions for the plan year ended June 30, 2020 through March 15, 2021. Contributions made on or before March 15, 2021, and designated for the plan year ended June 30, 2020, will be included in the final valuation as of July 1, 2020. The final funded status as of July 1, 2020 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 is filed (this Form 5500 is due to be filed no later than April 2022).
(b)    The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan's funded status as of July 1, 2019 is preliminary and may increase because the plan's participants were permitted to make contributions for the plan year ended June 30, 2019 through March 15, 2020. Contributions made on or before March 15, 2020, and designated for the plan year ended June 30, 2019, will be included in the final valuation as of July 1, 2019. The final funded status as of July 1, 2019 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 is filed (this Form 5500 is due to be filed no later than April 2021).

(a)The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan's funded status as of July 1, 2019 is preliminary and may increase because the plan's participants were permitted to make contributions for the plan year ended June 30, 2019 through March 15, 2020. Contributions made on or before March 15, 2020, and designated for the plan year ended June 30, 2019, will be included in the final valuation as of July 1, 2019. The final funded status as of July 1, 2019 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 is filed (this Form 5500 is due to be filed no later than April 2021).
(b)The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan's funded status as of July 1, 2018 is preliminary and may increase because the plan's participants were permitted to make contributions for the plan year ended June 30, 2018 through March 15, 2019. Contributions made on or before March 15, 2019, and designated for the plan year ended June 30, 2018, will be included in the final valuation as of July 1, 2018. The final funded status as of July 1, 2018 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 is filed (this Form 5500 is due to be filed no later than April 2020).

Qualified Defined Contribution Plan. The FHLB also participates in the PentegraFidelity Defined Contribution Plan, for Financial Institutions, a tax-qualified, defined contribution pension plan. The FHLB contributes a percentage of the participants' compensation by making a matching contribution equal to a percentage of voluntary employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. The FHLB contributed $1,437,000, $1,333,000, $1,249,000, and $1,191,000$1,249,000 in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, respectively. The FHLB's contributions are recorded as compensation and benefits expense in the Statements of Income.

NonqualifiedNon-qualified Supplemental Defined Benefit Retirement Plan (Defined Benefit Retirement Plan). The FHLB maintains a nonqualified,non-qualified, unfunded defined benefit plan. The plan ensures that participants receive the full amount of benefits to which they would have been entitled under the qualified defined benefit plan in the absence of limits on benefit levels imposed by the IRS. There are no funded plan assets. The FHLB has established a grantor trust, which is included in held-to-maturity securities on the Statements of Condition, to meet future benefit obligations and current payments to beneficiaries.

Postretirement Benefits Plan. The FHLB also sponsors a Postretirement Benefits Plan that includes health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. Future retirees are eligible for the postretirement benefits plan if they were hired prior to August 1, 1990, are age 55 or older, and their age plus years of continuous service at retirement are greater than or equal to 80. Spouses are covered subject to required contributions. There are no funded plan assets that have been designated to provide postretirement benefits.


124

Table of Contents
Table 17.213.2 presents the obligations and funding status of the FHLB's Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefits Plan. The benefit obligation represents projected benefit obligation for the nonqualified supplemental Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the Postretirement Benefits Plan.

Table 17.213.2 - Benefit Obligation, Fair Value of Plan Assets and Funded Status (in thousands)
 Defined Benefit Retirement PlanPostretirement Benefits Plan
Change in benefit obligation:2020201920202019
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$44,246 $38,687 $4,638 $4,481 
Service cost1,129 902 14 
Interest cost1,324 1,550 141 181 
Actuarial loss (gain)4,749 5,496 478 169 
Benefits paid(1,910)(2,389)(220)(207)
Benefit obligation at end of year49,538 44,246 5,046 4,638 
Change in plan assets:    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Employer contribution1,910 2,389 220 207 
Benefits paid(1,910)(2,389)(220)(207)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status at end of year$(49,538)$(44,246)$(5,046)$(4,638)
 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Postretirement Benefits Plan
Change in benefit obligation:20192018 20192018
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$38,687
$39,545
 $4,481
$4,795
Service cost902
1,129
 14
19
Interest cost1,550
1,353
 181
166
Actuarial loss (gain)5,496
(1,127) 169
(276)
Benefits paid(2,389)(2,213) (207)(223)
Benefit obligation at end of year44,246
38,687
 4,638
4,481
Change in plan assets:     
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

Employer contribution2,389
2,213
 207
223
Benefits paid(2,389)(2,213) (207)(223)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

Funded status at end of year$(44,246)$(38,687) $(4,638)$(4,481)


Amounts recognized in “Other liabilities” on the Statements of Condition for the FHLB's nonqualified supplemental Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefits Plan as of December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were (in thousands) $48,884$54,584 and $43,168.$48,884.

Table 17.313.3 - Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (in thousands)
 Defined Benefit Retirement PlanPostretirement
Benefits Plan
 2020201920202019
Net actuarial loss$18,901 $16,440 $802 $324 
 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan 
Postretirement
Benefits Plan
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Net actuarial loss$16,440
 $12,779
 $324
 $154


Table 17.413.4 - Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (in thousands)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 Defined Benefit
Retirement Plan
 Postretirement Benefits Plan
 202020192018 202020192018
Net Periodic Benefit Cost     
Service cost$1,129 $902 $1,129  $$14 $19 
Interest cost1,324 1,550 1,353  141 181 166 
Amortization of net loss2,288 1,834 2,200  
Net periodic benefit cost$4,741 $4,286 $4,682  $150 $195 $185 
Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income
Net loss (gain)$4,749 $5,496 $(1,127)$478 $169 $(276)
Amortization of net loss(2,288)(1,834)(2,200)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income2,461 3,662 (3,327)478 169 (276)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$7,202 $7,948 $1,355 $628 $364 $(91)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
Defined Benefit
Retirement Plan
 Postretirement Benefits Plan
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Net Periodic Benefit Cost           
Service cost$902
 $1,129
 $882
 $14
 $19
 $28
Interest cost1,550
 1,353
 1,367
 181
 166
 197
Amortization of net loss1,834
 2,200
 1,702
 
 
 5
Net periodic benefit cost$4,286
 $4,682
 $3,951
 $195
 $185
 $230
Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income           
Net loss (gain)$5,496
 $(1,127) $5,060
 $169
 $(276) $(96)
Amortization of net loss(1,834) (2,200) (1,702) 
 
 (5)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income3,662
 (3,327) 3,358
 169
 (276) (101)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and
   other comprehensive income
$7,948

$1,355

$7,309

$364

$(91)
$129


125


Table of Contents
For the Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and the Postretirement Benefits Plan, the related service cost is recorded as part of Non-Interest Expense - Compensation and Benefits on the Statements of Income. The non-service related components of interest cost and amortization of net loss are recorded as Non-Interest Expense - Other in the Statements of Income.

Table 17.5 presents the estimated net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year.

Table 17.5 - Amortization for Next Fiscal Year (in thousands)
 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Postretirement Benefits Plan
Net actuarial loss$2,254
 $


Table 17.613.5 presents the key assumptions used for the actuarial calculations to determine benefit obligations for the nonqualified supplemental Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefits Plan.

Table 17.613.5 - Benefit Obligation Key Assumptions
Defined Benefit Retirement PlanPostretirement Benefits Plan
 2020201920202019
Discount rate2.26 %3.06 %2.33 %3.12 %
Salary increases5.00 %5.00 %N/AN/A
 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Postretirement Benefits Plan
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Discount rate3.06% 4.10% 3.12% 4.15%
Salary increases5.00% 5.00% N/A
 N/A


Table 17.713.6 presents the key assumptions used for the actuarial calculations to determine net periodic benefit cost for the FHLB's Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefit Plan.

Table 17.713.6 - Net Periodic Benefit Cost Key Assumptions
Defined Benefit Retirement PlanPostretirement Benefits Plan
 202020192018202020192018
Discount rate3.06 %4.10 %3.45 %3.12 %4.15 %3.53 %
Salary increases5.00 %5.00 %5.00 %N/AN/AN/A
 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Postretirement Benefits Plan
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Discount rate4.10% 3.45% 3.91% 4.15% 3.53% 4.10%
Salary increases5.00% 5.00% 4.50% N/A
 N/A
 N/A


Table 17.813.7 - Postretirement Benefits Plan Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates
 20202019
Assumed for next year5.50 %6.00 %
Ultimate rate5.00 %5.00 %
Year that ultimate rate is reached20212021
 2019 2018
Assumed for next year6.00% 6.50%
Ultimate rate5.00% 5.00%
Year that ultimate rate is reached2021
 2021


The effect of a percentage point increase in the assumed health care trend rates would be an increase in net periodic postretirement benefit expense of $34,000 and in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) of $775,000. The effect of a percentage point decrease in the assumed health care trend rates would be a decrease in net periodic postretirement benefit expense of $27,000 and in APBO of $627,000.

The discount rates for the disclosures as of December 31, 20192020 were determined by using a discounted cash flow approach, which incorporates the timing of each expected future benefit payment. Estimated future benefit payments are based on each plan's census data, benefit formulas and provisions, and valuation assumptions reflecting the probability of decrement and survival. The present value of the future benefit payments is determined by using weighted average duration based interest rate yields from a variety of highly rated relevant corporate bond indices as of December 31, 2019,2020, and solving for the single discount rate that produces the same present value.


Table 17.913.8 presents the estimated future benefits payments reflecting expected future services for the years ended after December 31, 2019.2020.

Table 17.913.8 - Estimated Future Benefit Payments (in thousands)
YearsDefined Benefit Retirement PlanPostretirement Benefit Plan
2021$2,171 $237 
20222,316 239 
20231,839 241 
20241,861 240 
20252,012 246 
2026 - 203012,447 1,264 
Years Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Postretirement Benefit Plan
2020 $2,128
 $218
2021 2,260
 232
2022 2,389
 233
2023 1,882
 234
2024 1,874
 231
2025 - 2029 11,651
 1,213
126

Table of Contents



Note 1814 - Segment Information

The FHLB has identified 2 primary operating segments based on its method of internal reporting: Traditional Member Finance and the MPP. These segments reflect the FHLB's two primary Mission Asset Activities and the manner in which they are managed from the perspective of development, resource allocation, product delivery, pricing, credit risk and operational administration. The segments identify the principal ways the FHLB provides services to member stockholders. The FHLB, as an interest rate spread manager, considers a segment's net interest income, net interest rate spread and, ultimately, net income as the key factors in allocating resources. Resource allocation decisions are made by considering these profitability measures in the context of the historical, current and expected risk profile of each segment and the entire balance sheet, as well as current incremental profitability measures relative to the incremental market risk profile.

Overall financial performance and risk management are dynamically managed primarily at the level of, and within the context of, the entire balance sheet rather than at the level of individual business segments or product lines. Also, the FHLB hedges specific asset purchases and specific subportfolios in the context of the entire mortgage asset portfolio and the entire balance sheet. Under this holistic approach, the market risk/return profile of each business segment does not correspond, in general, to the performance that each segment would generate if it were completely managed on a separate basis, and it is not possible to accurately determine what the performance would be if the two business segments were managed on a stand-alone basis. Further, because financial and risk management is a dynamic process, the performance of a segment over a single identified period may not reflect the long-term expected or actual future trends for the segment.

The Traditional Member Finance segment includes products such as Advances and investments and the borrowing costs related to those assets. The FHLB assigns its investments to this segment primarily because they historically have been used to provide liquidity for Advances and to support the level and volatility of earnings from Advances. All interest rate swaps and a portion of swaptions, including their market value adjustments, are allocated to the Traditional Member Finance segment. The FHLB executed all of its interest rate swaps in its management of market risk for the Traditional Member Finance segment. The FHLB enters into swaptions to minimize the prepayment risk in its overall mortgage asset portfolio.

Income from the MPP is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on mortgage loans and the borrowing cost of Consolidated Obligations outstanding allocated to this segment at the time debt is issued. MPP income also includes the gains (losses) on derivatives associated with the MPP segment, comprising all mortgage delivery commitments and forward rate agreements and a portion of swaptions.

Both segments also earn income from investment of interest-free capital. Capital is allocated proportionate to each segment's average assets based on the total balance sheet's average capital-to-assets ratio. Expenses are allocated based on cost accounting techniques that include direct usage, time allocations and square footage of space used. AHP assessments are calculated using the current assessment rates based on the income before assessments for each segment.


127

Table of Contents
The following tables set forth the FHLB's financial performance by operating segment for the years ended December 31.

Table 18.114.1 - Financial Performance by Operating Segment (in thousands)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 Traditional Member
Finance
MPPTotal
2020   
Net interest income$385,127 $21,403 $406,530 
Non-interest income (loss)(58,701)51,633 (7,068)
Non-interest expense80,569 11,704 92,273 
Income before assessments245,857 61,332 307,189 
Affordable Housing Program assessments24,693 6,133 30,826 
Net income$221,164 $55,199 $276,363 
2019   
Net interest income$308,585 $97,247 $405,832 
Non-interest income (loss)(2,252)(7,967)(10,219)
Non-interest expense77,751 10,967 88,718 
Income before assessments228,582 78,313 306,895 
Affordable Housing Program assessments22,969 7,832 30,801 
Net income$205,613 $70,481 $276,094 
2018   
Net interest income$389,615 $108,957 $498,572 
Non-interest income (loss)(32,415)(4,403)(36,818)
Non-interest expense73,441 11,278 84,719 
Income before assessments283,759 93,276 377,035 
Affordable Housing Program assessments28,556 9,328 37,884 
Net income$255,203 $83,948 $339,151 

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 
Traditional Member
Finance
 MPP Total
2019     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses$308,585
 $97,247
 $405,832
Non-interest income (loss)(2,252) (7,967) (10,219)
Non-interest expense77,751
 10,967
 88,718
Income before assessments228,582
 78,313
 306,895
Affordable Housing Program assessments22,969
 7,832
 30,801
Net income$205,613
 $70,481
 $276,094
2018     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses$389,615
 $108,957
 $498,572
Non-interest income (loss)(32,415) (4,403) (36,818)
Non-interest expense73,441
 11,278
 84,719
Income before assessments283,759
 93,276
 377,035
Affordable Housing Program assessments28,556
 9,328
 37,884
Net income$255,203
 $83,948
 $339,151
2017     
Net interest income$334,383
 $94,760
 $429,143
Provision for credit losses
 500
 500
Net interest income after provision for credit losses334,383
 94,260
 428,643
Non-interest income (loss)2,979
 (4,216) (1,237)
Non-interest expense67,571
 11,147
 78,718
Income before assessments269,791
 78,897
 348,688
Affordable Housing Program assessments27,230
 7,890
 35,120
Net income$242,561
 $71,007
 $313,568


Table 18.214.2 - Asset Balances by Operating Segment (in thousands)
Assets
Traditional Member
Finance
MPPTotal
December 31, 2020$53,356,209 $11,940,030 $65,296,239 
December 31, 201981,064,206 12,427,353 93,491,559 
 Assets
 Traditional Member
Finance
 MPP Total
December 31, 2019$81,064,206
 $12,427,353
 $93,491,559
December 31, 201886,042,150
 13,160,423
 99,202,573



Note 1915 - Fair Value Disclosures

The fair value amounts recorded on the Statements of Condition and presented in the related note disclosures have been determined by the FHLB using available market information and the FHLB's best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price). The fair values reflect the FHLB's judgment of how a market participant would estimate the fair values.

Fair Value Hierarchy. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The inputs are evaluated and an overall level for the measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of how market observable the fair value measurement is. An entity must disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements are classified.


128

Table of Contents
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

Level 1 Inputs - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the reporting entity can access on the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.liability, which are supported by limited to no market activity and reflect the FHLB's own assumptions.

The FHLB reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications would be reported as transfers in/out at fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the changes occur. The FHLB did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities betweeninto or out of Level 3 of the fair value levelshierarchy during the years ended December 31, 20192020 or 2019.
2018.


Table 19.115.1 presents the net carrying value/carrying value, fair value, and fair value hierarchy of financial assets and liabilities of the FHLB. The FHLB records trading securities, available-for-sale securities, derivative assets, derivative liabilities, certain Advances and certain Consolidated Obligations at fair value on a recurring basis, and on occasion, certain mortgage loans held for portfolio on a nonrecurring basis. The FHLB records all other financial assets and liabilities at amortized cost. Refer to Table 19.215.2 for further details about the financial assets and liabilities held at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis.

129

Table of Contents
Table 19.115.1 - Fair Value Summary (in thousands)
December 31, 2020
Fair Value
Financial InstrumentsNet Carrying ValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Assets:  
Cash and due from banks$2,984,073 $2,984,073 $2,984,073 $$$— 
Interest-bearing deposits555,104 555,104 555,104 — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,818,268 1,818,268 1,818,268 — 
Federal funds sold4,240,000 4,240,000 4,240,000 — 
Trading securities10,488,124 10,488,124 10,488,124 — 
Available-for-sale securities291,587 291,587 291,587 — 
Held-to-maturity securities9,648,171 9,792,136 9,792,136 — 
Advances (2)
25,362,003 25,573,785 25,573,785 — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio9,548,506 9,861,802 9,798,019 63,783 — 
Accrued interest receivable113,701 113,701 113,701 — 
Derivative assets215,888 215,888 2,732 213,156 
Liabilities:  
Deposits1,327,202 1,327,267 1,327,267 — 
Consolidated Obligations: 
Discount Notes27,500,244 27,501,296 27,501,296 — 
Bonds (3)
31,996,311 32,785,647 32,785,647 — 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock19,454 19,454 19,454 — 
Accrued interest payable77,521 77,521 77,521 — 
Derivative liabilities3,813 3,813 165,737 (161,924)
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.
(2)Includes (in thousands) $27,202 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2020.
(3)Includes (in thousands) $2,262,388 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2020.

130

Table of Contents
 December 31, 2019
   Fair Value
Financial InstrumentsCarrying Value Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Assets:           
Cash and due from banks$20,608
 $20,608
 $20,608
 $
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits550,160
 550,160
 
 550,160
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,348,584
 2,348,607
 
 2,348,607
 
 
Federal funds sold4,833,000
 4,833,000
 
 4,833,000
 
 
Trading securities11,615,693
 11,615,693
 
 11,615,693
 
 
Available-for-sale securities1,542,185
 1,542,185
 
 1,542,185
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities13,499,319
 13,501,207
 
 13,501,207
 
 
Advances (2)
47,369,573
 47,458,028
 
 47,458,028
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net11,235,353
 11,437,180
 
 11,424,857
 12,323
 
Accrued interest receivable182,252
 182,252
 
 182,252
 
 
Derivative assets267,165
 267,165
 
 32,195
 
 234,970
Liabilities:           
Deposits951,296
 951,343
 
 951,343
 
 
Consolidated Obligations:           
Discount Notes (3)
49,084,219
 49,086,723
 
 49,086,723
 
 
Bonds (4)
38,439,724
 38,832,230
 
 38,832,230
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock21,669
 21,669
 21,669
 
 
 
Accrued interest payable126,091
 126,091
 
 126,091
 
 
Derivative liabilities1,310
 1,310
 
 54,850
 
 (53,540)
Other:           
Standby bond purchase agreements
 407
 
 407
 
 
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.
(2)
Includes (in thousands) $5,238 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.
(3)Includes (in thousands) $12,386,974 of Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.
(4)
Includes (in thousands) $4,757,177 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.

December 31, 2019
Fair Value
Financial InstrumentsCarrying ValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Assets:  
Cash and due from banks$20,608 $20,608 $20,608 $$$— 
Interest-bearing deposits550,160 550,160 550,160 — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,348,584 2,348,607 2,348,607 — 
Federal funds sold4,833,000 4,833,000 4,833,000 — 
Trading securities11,615,693 11,615,693 11,615,693 — 
Available-for-sale securities1,542,185 1,542,185 1,542,185 — 
Held-to-maturity securities13,499,319 13,501,207 13,501,207 — 
Advances (2)
47,369,573 47,458,028 47,458,028 — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio11,235,353 11,437,180 11,424,857 12,323 — 
Accrued interest receivable182,252 182,252 182,252 — 
Derivative assets267,165 267,165 32,195 234,970 
Liabilities:  
Deposits951,296 951,343 951,343 — 
Consolidated Obligations:  
Discount Notes (3)
49,084,219 49,086,723 49,086,723 — 
Bonds (4)
38,439,724 38,832,230 38,832,230 — 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock21,669 21,669 21,669 — 
Accrued interest payable126,091 126,091 126,091 — 
Derivative liabilities1,310 1,310 54,850 (53,540)

(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.

(2)Includes (in thousands) $5,238 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.
(3)Includes (in thousands) $12,386,974 of Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.
 December 31, 2018
   Fair Value
Financial InstrumentsCarrying Value Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Assets:           
Cash and due from banks$10,037
 $10,037
 $10,037
 $
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits122
 122
 
 122
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell4,402,208

4,402,237
 
 4,402,237
 
 
Federal funds sold10,793,000
 10,793,000
 
 10,793,000
 
 
Trading securities223,980
 223,980
 
 223,980
 
 
Available-for-sale securities2,402,897
 2,402,897
 
 2,402,897
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities15,791,222
 15,575,368
 
 15,575,368
 
 
Advances (2)
54,822,252
 54,736,645
 
 54,736,645
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,500,917
 10,329,982
 
 10,317,010
 12,972
 
Accrued interest receivable169,982
 169,982
 
 169,982
 
 
Derivative assets65,765
 65,765
 
 23,341
 
 42,424
Liabilities:           
Deposits669,016
 668,947
 
 668,947
 
 
Consolidated Obligations:           
Discount Notes46,943,632
 46,944,523
 
 46,944,523
 
 
Bonds (3)
45,659,138
 45,385,615
 
 45,385,615
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock23,184
 23,184
 23,184
 
 
 
Accrued interest payable147,337
 147,337
 
 147,337
 
 
Derivative liabilities4,586
 4,586
 
 21,379
 
 (16,793)
Other:           
Standby bond purchase agreements
 443
 
 443
 
 
(4)Includes (in thousands) $4,757,177 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2019.
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.
(2)
Includes (in thousands)

$10,008 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2018.
(3)
Includes (in thousands) $3,906,610 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2018.

Summary of Valuation Methodologies and Primary Inputs.

The valuation methodologies and primary inputs used to develop the measurement of fair value for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis in the Statement of Condition are listed below. The fair values and level within the fair value hierarchy of these assets and liabilities are reported in Table 19.2.15.2.

Investment securities – MBS: To value MBS holdings, the FHLB incorporates prices from multiple designated third-party pricing vendors, when available. The pricing vendors use various proprietary models to price MBS. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources including, but not limited to: benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and other market-related data. As many MBS do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use available information such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to determine the prices for individual securities. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all MBS valuations, which facilitates resolution of potentially erroneous prices identified by the FHLB. The FHLB has conducted reviews of multiple pricing vendors to confirm and further augment its understanding of the vendors' pricing processes, methodologies and control procedures for specific instruments.

The FHLB's valuation technique for estimating the fair values of MBS first requires the establishment of a “median” price for each security. All prices that are outside the threshold (“outliers”) are subject to further analysis (including, but not limited to,

131

Table of Contents
comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities, non-binding dealer estimates, and/or use of an internal model that is deemed most appropriate) to determine if an outlier is a better estimate of fair value. If an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is determined to be a better estimate of fair value, then the outlier (or the other price as appropriate) is used as the final price rather than the default price. Alternatively, if the analysis confirms that an outlier is in fact not representative of fair value and the default price is the best estimate, then the default price is used as the final price. In all cases, the final price is used to determine the fair value of the security.

If all prices received for a security are outside the tolerance threshold level of the median price, then there is no default price, and the final price is determined by an evaluation of all outlier prices as described above.

Multiple prices were received for substantially all of the FHLB's MBS holdings and the final prices for those securities were computed by averaging the prices received. Based on the FHLB's review of the pricing methods and controls employed by the third-party pricing vendors and the relative lack of dispersion among the vendor prices, the FHLB believes its final prices result in reasonable estimates of fair value and further that the fair value measurements are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy.

Investment securities – Non-MBS: To determine the estimated fair values of non-MBS investment securities, the FHLB can use either (a) an income approach based on a market-observable interest rate curve that may be adjusted for a spread, or (b) prices received from third-party pricing vendors. For its U.S. Treasury obligations, the FHLB determines the fair value using the income approach. The income approach uses indicative fair values derived from a discounted cash flow methodology. The FHLB uses the Treasury curve as the market-observable interest rate curve. For GSE obligations and certificates of deposit, the fair value is determined using prices received from third-party pricing vendors. For GSE obligations, the FHLB uses prices from multiple third-party pricing vendors. The pricing vendors' methodology and the FHLB's validation process is consistent with the MBS process described above. For certificates of deposit, the fair value is determined based on each security’s indicative fair value obtained from a third-party vendor. The FHLB performs several validation steps in order to verify the accuracy and reasonableness of the fair values obtained for certificates of deposit. These steps may include, but are not limited to, a detailed review of instruments with significant periodic price changes and a derived fair value from an option-adjusted discounted cash flow methodology using market-observed inputs for the interest rate environment and similar instruments.

Advances recorded under the fair value option: The FHLB determines the fair values of Advances recorded under the fair value option by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows from these Advances. The discount rates used in these calculations are the replacement rates for Advances with similar terms, as approximated either by adding an estimated current spread to the SOFR or LIBOR Swap Curve or by using current indicative market yields, as indicated by the FHLB's pricing methodologies for Advances with similar current terms. Advance pricing is determined based on the FHLB's rates on Consolidated Obligations. To determine the estimated fair value for Advances with optionality, market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current prices for similar options are also used. In accordance with Finance Agency regulations, Advances with a maturity and repricing period greater than six months require a prepayment fee sufficient to make the FHLB financially indifferent to the borrower's decision to prepay the Advances. Therefore, the fair value of Advances does not assume prepayment risk.

Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio: The estimated fair values of impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio on a non-recurring basis are based on property values obtained from a third-party pricing vendor.

Derivative assets/liabilities: The FHLB's derivative assets/liabilities generally consist of interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions, TBA MBS (forward rate agreements), and mortgage delivery commitments.

The FHLB's interest rate related derivatives (swaps and swaptions) are traded in the over-the-counter market. Therefore, the FHLB determines the fair value of each individual instrument using market value models that use readily observable market inputs as their basis (inputs that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources). The FHLB uses a mid-market pricing convention as a practical expedient for fair value measurements within a bid-ask spread. These models reflect the contractual terms, including the period to maturity, as well as the significant inputs noted below. The fair value determination uses the standard valuation technique of discounted cash flow analysis. The FHLB performs several validation steps to verify the reasonableness of the fair value output generated by the primary market value model. In addition to an annual model validation, the FHLB prepares a monthly reconciliation of the model's fair values to estimates of fair values provided by the derivative counterparties. The FHLB believes these processes provide a reasonable basis for it to place continued reliance on the derivative fair values generated by the model.


132

Table of Contents
The fair value of TBA MBS is based on independent indicative and/or quoted prices generated by market transactions involving comparable instruments. The FHLB determines the fair value of mortgage delivery commitments using market prices from the TBA/mortgage-backed security market or TBA/Ginnie Mae market and adjustments noted below.

The FHLB's discounted cash flow analysis uses market-observable inputs. Inputs, by class of derivative, are as follows:

Interest rate swaps and interest rate swaptions:
Discount rate assumption. OIS or SOFR Swap Curve;
Forward interest rate assumption. OIS, SOFR, or LIBOR Swap Curve; and
Volatility assumption. Market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options.
Discount rate assumption. OIS or SOFR Swap Curve;
Forward interest rate assumption. OIS, SOFR, or LIBOR Swap Curve; and
Volatility assumption. Market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options.

TBA MBS:
Market-based prices by coupon class and expected term until settlement.
Market-based prices by coupon class and expected term until settlement.

Mortgage delivery commitments:
TBA securities prices. Market-based prices by coupon class and expected term until settlement, adjusted to reflect the contractual terms of the mortgage delivery commitments. The adjustments to the market prices are market observable, or can be corroborated with observable market data.
TBA securities prices. Market-based prices by coupon class and expected term until settlement, adjusted to reflect the contractual terms of the mortgage delivery commitments. The adjustments to the market prices are market observable, or can be corroborated with observable market data.

The FHLB is subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to its derivative transactions. For uncleared derivatives, the degree of credit risk depends on the extent to which master netting arrangements are included in these contracts to mitigate the risk. The FHLB has evaluated the potential for the fair value of the instruments to be impacted by counterparty credit risk and has determined that no adjustments were significant or necessary to the overall fair value measurements.

The fair values of the FHLB's derivatives include accrued interest receivable/payable and related cash collateral. The estimated fair values of the accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral approximate their carrying values due to their short-term nature. Derivatives are presented on a net basis by counterparty when it has met the netting requirements. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset and if negative, they are classified as a liability.

Consolidated Obligations recorded under the fair value option: The FHLB determines the fair values of non-option-based Consolidated Obligation Bonds and all Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes recorded under the fair value option by calculating the present value of scheduled future cash flows. Inputs used to determine the fair value of these Consolidated Obligation Bonds and Discount Notes are the discount rates, which are estimated current market yields. For non-option-based Bonds and all Discount Notes, the market yields are either indicated by the Office of Finance for Consolidated Obligations with similar current terms or by a constructedthe SOFR swap curve for SOFR indexed Consolidated Obligations.

The FHLB determines the fair values of option-based Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option based on pricing received from designated third-party pricing vendors. The pricing vendors used apply various proprietary models to price these Consolidated Obligation Bonds. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources including, but not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data. Since many Consolidated Obligation Bonds do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use available information, as applicable, such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to determine the prices for individual Consolidated Obligation Bonds. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all valuations, which facilitates resolution of potentially erroneous prices identified by the FHLB.

When pricing vendors are used, the FHLB's valuation technique first requires the establishment of a “median” price for each Consolidated Obligation Bond. All prices that are outside the threshold (“outliers”) are subject to further analysis (including, but not limited to, comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities, non-binding dealer estimates, and/or use of an internal model that is deemed most appropriate) to determine if an outlier is a better estimate of fair value. If an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is determined to be a better estimate of fair value, then the outlier (or the other price as appropriate) is used as the final price rather than the default price. Alternatively, if the analysis confirms that an outlier is in fact not representative of fair value and the default price is the best estimate, then the default price is used as the final price. In all cases, the final price is used to determine the fair value of the security.

133

Table of Contents
If all prices received for a Consolidated Obligation Bond are outside the tolerance threshold level of the median price, then there is no default price, and the final price is determined by an evaluation of all outlier prices as described above.

Multiple vendor prices were received for the FHLB's Consolidated Obligation Bonds and the final prices for those bonds were computed by averaging the prices received. Based on the FHLB's review of the pricing methods and controls employed by the third-party pricing vendors and the relative lack of dispersion among the vendor prices, the FHLB believes its final prices result in reasonable estimates of fair value and that the fair value measurements are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy.

The FHLB has conducted reviews of its pricing vendors to confirm and further augment its understanding of the vendors' pricing processes, methodologies and control procedures for Consolidated Obligation Bonds.

Adjustments may be necessary to reflect the 11 FHLBanks' credit quality when valuing Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option. Due to the joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, the FHLB monitors its own creditworthiness and the creditworthiness of the other FHLBanks to determine whether any credit adjustments are necessary in its fair value measurement of Consolidated Obligation Bonds. No adjustments were considered necessary at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.

Subjectivity of estimates. Estimates of the fair values of financial assets and liabilities using the methods described above and other methods are highly subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters such as the amount and timing of future cash flows, prepayment speeds, interest rate volatility, distributions of future interest rates used to value options, and discount rates that appropriately reflect market and credit risks. The judgments also include the parameters, methods, and assumptions used in models to value the options. The use of different assumptions could have a material effect on the fair value estimates. Since these estimates are made as of a specific point in time, they are susceptible to material near term changes.

134


Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements.

Table 19.215.2 presents the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are recorded on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, by level within the fair value hierarchy. The FHLB records nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect partial write-downs on certain mortgage loans.


Table 19.215.2 - Fair Value Measurements (in thousands)
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020
 Total  Level 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets     
Trading securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations$8,362,211 $$8,362,211 $$— 
GSE obligations2,125,580 2,125,580 — 
U.S. obligation single-family MBS333 333 — 
Total trading securities10,488,124 10,488,124 — 
Available-for-sale securities:     
GSE obligations142,402 142,402 — 
GSE multi-family MBS149,185 149,185 — 
Total available-for-sale securities291,587 291,587 — 
Advances27,202 27,202 — 
Derivative assets:     
Interest rate related214,832 1,676 213,156 
Mortgage delivery commitments1,056 1,056 — 
Total derivative assets215,888 2,732 213,156 
Total assets at fair value$11,022,801 $$10,809,645 $$213,156 
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities     
Consolidated Obligation Bonds$2,262,388 $$2,262,388 $$— 
Derivative liabilities:     
Interest rate related3,813 165,737 (161,924)
Total derivative liabilities3,813 165,737 (161,924)
Total liabilities at fair value$2,266,201 $$2,428,125 $$(161,924)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets (2)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio$108 $$$108 
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.
(2)The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020.

135

Table of Contents
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
 Total   Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets         
Trading securities:         
U.S. Treasury obligations$9,626,964
 $
 $9,626,964
 $
 $
GSE obligations1,988,259
 
 1,988,259
 
 
U.S. obligation single-family MBS470
 
 470
 
 
Total trading securities11,615,693
 
 11,615,693
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:         
Certificates of deposit1,410,111
 
 1,410,111
 
 
GSE obligations132,074
 
 132,074
 
 
Total available-for-sale securities1,542,185
 
 1,542,185
 
 
Advances5,238
 
 5,238
 
 
Derivative assets:         
Interest rate related264,346
 
 29,376
 
 234,970
Forward rate agreements21
 
 21
 
 
Mortgage delivery commitments2,798
 
 2,798
 
 
Total derivative assets267,165
 
 32,195
 
 234,970
Total assets at fair value$13,430,281
 $
 $13,195,311
 $
 $234,970
          
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities         
Consolidated Obligations:         
Discount Notes$12,386,974
 $
 $12,386,974
 $
 $
Bonds4,757,177
 
 4,757,177
 
 
Total Consolidated Obligations17,144,151
 
 17,144,151
 
 
Derivative liabilities:         
Interest rate related464
 
 54,004
 
 (53,540)
Forward rate agreements782
 
 782
 
 
Mortgage delivery commitments64
 
 64
 
 
Total derivative liabilities1,310
 
 54,850
 
 (53,540)
Total liabilities at fair value$17,145,461
 $
 $17,199,001
 $
 $(53,540)
(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
 Total  Level 1Level 2Level 3
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets     
Trading securities:     
U.S. Treasury obligations$9,626,964 $$9,626,964 $$— 
GSE obligations1,988,259 1,988,259 — 
U.S. obligation single-family MBS470 470 — 
Total trading securities11,615,693 11,615,693 — 
Available-for-sale securities:     
Certificates of deposit1,410,111 1,410,111 — 
GSE obligations132,074 132,074 — 
Total available-for-sale securities1,542,185 1,542,185 — 
Advances5,238 5,238 — 
Derivative assets:     
Interest rate related264,346 29,376 234,970 
Forward rate agreements21 21 — 
Mortgage delivery commitments2,798 2,798 — 
Total derivative assets267,165 32,195 234,970 
Total assets at fair value$13,430,281 $$13,195,311 $$234,970 
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities     
Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes$12,386,974 $$12,386,974 $$— 
Bonds4,757,177 4,757,177 — 
Total Consolidated Obligations17,144,151 17,144,151 — 
Derivative liabilities:     
Interest rate related464 54,004 (53,540)
Forward rate agreements782 782 — 
Mortgage delivery commitments64 64 — 
Total derivative liabilities1,310 54,850 (53,540)
Total liabilities at fair value$17,145,461 $$17,199,001 $$(53,540)

(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.


 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
 Total   Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1)
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets         
Trading securities:         
GSE obligations$223,368
 $
 $223,368
 $
 $
U.S. obligation single-family MBS612
 
 612
 
 
Total trading securities223,980
 
 223,980
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:         
Certificates of deposit2,350,002
 
 2,350,002
 
 
GSE obligations52,895
 
 52,895
 
 
Total available-for-sale securities2,402,897
 
 2,402,897
 
 
Advances10,008
 
 10,008
 
 
Derivative assets:         
Interest rate related64,039
 
 21,615
 
 42,424
Mortgage delivery commitments1,726
 
 1,726
 
 
Total derivative assets65,765
 
 23,341
 
 42,424
Total assets at fair value$2,702,650
 $
 $2,660,226
 $
 $42,424
          
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities         
Consolidated Obligation Bonds$3,906,610
 $
 $3,906,610
 $
 $
Derivative liabilities:         
Interest rate related1,921
 
 18,714
 
 (16,793)
Forward rate agreements2,664
 
 2,664
 
 
Mortgage delivery commitments1
 
 1
 
 
Total derivative liabilities4,586
 
 21,379
 
 (16,793)
Total liabilities at fair value$3,911,196
 $
 $3,927,989
 $
 $(16,793)
          
Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets (2)
         
Mortgage loans held for portfolio$311
 $
 $
 $311
  

(1)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.
(2)The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Fair Value Option. The fair value option provides an irrevocable option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value. It requires a company to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which it has chosen to use fair value on the face of the Statements of Condition. Fair value is used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets, liabilities and commitments, with the changes in fair value recognized in net income. If elected, interest income and interest expense on Advances and Consolidated Obligations carried at fair value are recognized based solely on the contractual amount of interest due or unpaid. Any transaction fees or costs are immediately recognized into other non-interest income or other non-interest expense.

The FHLB has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments that either do not qualify for hedge accounting or may be at risk for not meeting hedge effectiveness requirements. These fair value elections were made primarily in an effort to

mitigate the potential income statement volatility that can arise from economic hedging relationships in which the carrying value of the hedged item is not adjusted for changes in fair value.

136

Table 19.3of Contents
Table 15.3 presents net gains (losses) recognized in earnings related to financial assets and liabilities in which the fair value option was elected during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.2018.


Table 19.315.3 – Fair Value Option - Financial Assets and Liabilities (in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
Net Gains (Losses) from Changes in Fair Value Recognized in Earnings202020192018
Advances$439 $238 $(4)
Consolidated Discount Notes1,060 (1,060)
Consolidated Bonds(8,792)(53,030)(14,180)
Total net gains (losses)$(7,293)$(53,852)$(14,184)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
Net Gains (Losses) from Changes in Fair Value Recognized in Earnings2019 2018 2017
Advances$238
 $(4) $(81)
Consolidated Discount Notes(1,060) 
 
Consolidated Bonds(53,030) (14,180) 10,490
Total net gains (losses)$(53,852) $(14,184) $10,409


For instruments recorded under the fair value option, the related contractual interest income and contractual interest expense are recorded as part of net interest income on the Statements of Income. The remaining changes in fair value for instruments in which the fair value option has been elected are recorded as “Net gains (losses) on financial instruments held under fair value option” in the Statements of Income, except for changes in fair value related to instrument specific credit risk, which are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Statement of Condition. The FHLB has determined that none of the remaining changes in fair value were related to instrument-specific credit risk for the years ended December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019. In determining that there has been 0 change in instrument-specific credit risk period to period, the FHLB primarily considered the following factors:

The FHLB is a federally chartered GSE, and as a result of this status, the FHLB’s Consolidated Obligations have historically received the same credit ratings as the government bond credit rating of the United States, even though they are not obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by the United States.

The FHLB is a federally chartered GSE, and as a result of this status, the FHLB’s Consolidated Obligations have historically received the same credit ratings as the government bond credit rating of the United States, even though they are not Obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by the United States.
The FHLB is jointly and severally liable with the other 10 FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Consolidated Obligations of each of the other FHLBanks.

The FHLB is jointly and severally liable with the other 10 FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all Consolidated Obligations of each of the other FHLBanks.

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate unpaid principal balance outstanding and the aggregate fair value for Advances and Consolidated Obligations for which the fair value option has been elected.

Table 19.415.4 – Aggregate Unpaid Balance and Aggregate Fair Value (in thousands)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Aggregate Unpaid Principal BalanceAggregate Fair ValueAggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal BalanceAggregate Unpaid Principal BalanceAggregate Fair ValueAggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance
Advances$26,500 $27,202 $702 $5,000 $5,238 $238 
Consolidated Discount Notes12,400,865 12,386,974 (13,891)
Consolidated Bonds2,241,000 2,262,388 21,388 4,739,000 4,757,177 18,177 

137
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance Aggregate Fair Value Aggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance Aggregate Fair Value Aggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance
Advances (1)
$5,000
 $5,238
 $238
 $10,000
 $10,008
 $8
Consolidated Discount Notes12,400,865
 12,386,974
 (13,891) 
 
 
Consolidated Bonds4,739,000
 4,757,177
 18,177
 3,941,000
 3,906,610
 (34,390)


Table of Contents
(1)At December 31, 2019 and 2018, none of the Advances were 90 days or more past due or had been placed on non-accrual status.



Note 2016 - Commitments and Contingencies


As previously described, Consolidated Obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability Finance Agency regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal and interest on Consolidated Obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. No FHLBank has ever been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any Consolidated Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank,

and as of December 31, 2019, and through the filing date of this report, the FHLB does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so.

The FHLB determined that it was not necessary to recognize a liability for the fair values of its joint and several obligation related to other FHLBanks' Consolidated ObligationsOff-Balance Sheet Commitments. Table 16.1 represents off-balance sheet commitments at December 31, 2019, 2018, or 2017.2020 and 2019. The jointFHLB has deemed it unnecessary to record any liabilities for credit losses on these commitments at December 31, 2020 and several obligations are mandated by Finance Agency regulations and are not the result of arms-length transactions among the FHLBanks. The FHLBanks have no control over the amount of the guaranty or the determination of how each FHLBank would perform under the joint and several obligation.

2019.

Table 20.116.1 - Off-Balance Sheet Commitments (in thousands)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Notional AmountExpire within one yearExpire after one yearTotalExpire within one yearExpire after one yearTotal
Standby Letters of Credit$27,741,220 $1,071,029 $28,812,249 $15,143,075 $1,062,105 $16,205,180 
Commitments for standby bond purchases35,030 35,030 20,360 55,150 75,510 
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans137,352 137,352 936,269 936,269 
Unsettled Consolidated Discount Notes, principal amount (1)
321,551 321,551 
(1)Expiration is based on settlement period rather than underlying contractual maturity of Consolidated Obligations.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Notional AmountExpire within one year Expire after one year Total Expire within one year Expire after one year Total
Standby Letters of Credit$15,143,075
 $1,062,105
 $16,205,180
 $14,578,925
 $268,395
 $14,847,320
Commitments for standby bond purchases20,360
 55,150
 75,510
 23,215
 54,820
 78,035
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans936,269
 
 936,269
 146,009
 
 146,009
Unsettled Consolidated Bonds, principal amount (1)

 
 
 92,000
 
 92,000
Unsettled Consolidated Discount Notes, principal amount (1)

 
 
 525,000
 
 525,000

(1)Expiration is based on settlement period rather than underlying contractual maturity of Consolidated Obligations.

Standby Letters of Credit.Credit: The FHLB issues Standby Letters of Credit on behalf of its members to support certain obligations of the members (or member's customer) to third-party beneficiaries. These Standby Letters of Credit are subject to the same collateralization and borrowing limits that are applicable to Advances. Standby Letters of Credit may be offered to assist members in facilitating residential housing finance, community lending, and asset-liability management, and to provide liquidity. In particular, members often use Standby Letters of Credit as collateral for deposits from federal and state government agencies. Standby Letters of Credit are executed for members for a fee. If the FHLB is required to make payment for a beneficiary's draw, the member either reimburses the FHLB for the amount drawn or, subject to the FHLB's discretion, the amount drawn may be converted into a collateralized Advance to the member. However, Standby Letters of Credit usually expire without being drawn upon. Standby Letters of Credit have original expiration periods of up to 18 years, currently expiring no later than 2034. Unearned fees and theThe carrying value of guarantees related to Standby Letters of Credit are recorded in other liabilities and amounted towere (in thousands) $5,170$8,675 and $3,331$5,170 at December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.

The FHLB monitors the creditworthiness of its members that have Standby Letters of Credit. In addition, Standby Letters of Credit are subject to the same collateralization and borrowing limits that apply to Advances and are fully collateralized at the time of issuance. As a result, the FHLB has deemed it unnecessary to record any additional liability on these commitments.

Standby Bond Purchase Agreements.Agreements: The FHLB has executed standby bond purchase agreements with 1 state housing authority whereby the FHLB, for a fee, agrees as a liquidity provider if required, to purchase and hold the authority's bonds until the designated marketing agent can find a suitable investor or the housing authority repurchases the bonds according to a schedule established by the standby agreement. Each standby agreement dictates the specific terms that would require the FHLB to purchase the bonds.bonds and typically allows the FHLB to terminate the agreement upon the occurrence of a default event of the issuer. The bond purchase commitments entered into by the FHLB have original expiration periods up to 6 years, currently no later than 2022,2023, although some are renewable at the option of the FHLB. During 20192020 and 2018,2019, the FHLB was not required to purchase any bonds under these agreements.

Commitments to Purchase Mortgage Loans.Loans: The FHLB enters into commitments that unconditionally obligate the FHLB to purchase mortgage loans. Commitments are generally for periods not to exceed 90 days. The delivery commitments are recorded as derivatives at their fair values.

Consolidated Obligations: As previously described, Consolidated Obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability Finance Agency regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal and interest on Consolidated Obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. No FHLBank has ever been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any Consolidated Obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2020, and through the filing date of this report, the FHLB does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so.

The FHLB determined that it was not necessary to recognize a liability for the fair values of its joint and several obligation related to other FHLBanks' Consolidated Obligations at December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018. The joint and several obligations are mandated by Finance Agency regulations and are not the result of arms-length transactions among the FHLBanks. The
138

Table of Contents
FHLBanks have no control over the amount of the guaranty or the determination of how each FHLBank would perform under the joint and several obligation.

Pledged Collateral. The FHLB may pledge securities, as collateral, related to derivatives. See Note 117 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information about the FHLB's pledged collateral and other credit-risk-related contingent features.

Legal Proceedings. From time to time, the FHLB is subject to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The FHLB would record an accrual for a loss contingency when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount could be

reasonably estimated. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any matters will have a material effect on the FHLB's financial condition or results of operations.


Note 2117 - Transactions with Other FHLBanks

The FHLB notes all transactions with other FHLBanks on the face of its financial statements. Occasionally, the FHLB loans short-term funds to and borrows short-term funds from other FHLBanks. These loans and borrowings are transacted at then current market rates when traded. There were no such loans or borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2020, 2019 2018, or 2017.2018. The following table details the average daily balance of lending and borrowing between the FHLB and other FHLBanks for the years ended December 31.

Table 21.117.1 - Lending and Borrowing Between the FHLB and Other FHLBanks (in thousands)
Average Daily Balances for the Years Ended December 31,
Average Daily Balances for the Years Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017 2020 20192018
Loans to other FHLBanks$2,877
 $1,370
 $14
Loans to other FHLBanks$4,918  $2,877 $1,370 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks137
 274
 959
Borrowings from other FHLBanks137  137 274 


In addition, the FHLB may, from time to time, assume the outstanding primary liability for Consolidated Obligations of another FHLBank (at then current market rates on the day when the transfer is traded) rather than issuing new debt for which the FHLB is the primary obligor. The FHLB then becomes the primary obligor on the transferred debt. There are no formal arrangements governing the transfer of Consolidated Obligations between the FHLBanks, and these transfers are not investments of one FHLBank in another FHLBank. Transferring debt at current market rates enables the FHLBank System to satisfy the debt issuance needs of individual FHLBanks without incurring the additional selling expenses (concession fees) associated with new debt. It also provides the transferring FHLBanks with outlets for extinguishing debt structures no longer required for their balance sheet management strategies.

There were 0 Consolidated Obligations transferred to the FHLB during the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019 the par amount of the liability on Consolidated Obligations transferred to the FHLB totaled (in thousands) $10,000. All such transfers were from the FHLBank of Boston. The net premiums associated with these transactions were (in thousands) $2,697 in 2019. There were 0 Consolidated Obligations transferred to the FHLB during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018, or 2017.2018. The FHLB had 0 Consolidated Obligations transferred to other FHLBanks during these periods.

139


Table of Contents
Note 2218 - Transactions with Stockholders

As a cooperative, the FHLB's capital stock is owned by its members, by former members that retain the stock as provided in the FHLB's Capital Plan and by nonmember institutions that have acquired members and must retain the stock to support Advances or other activities with the FHLB. All Advances are issued to members and all mortgage loans held for portfolio are purchased from members. The FHLB also maintains demand deposit accounts for members, primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to Advances and mortgage loan purchases. Additionally, the FHLB may enter into interest rate swaps with its stockholders. The FHLB may not invest in any equity securities issued by its stockholders and it has not purchased any MBS securitized by, or other direct long-term investments in, its stockholders.

For financial statement purposes, the FHLB defines related parties as those members with more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the FHLB capital stock outstanding. Federal statute prescribes the voting rights of members in the election of both Member and Independent directors. For Member directorships, the Finance Agency designates the number of Member directorships in a given year and an eligible voting member may vote only for candidates seeking election in its respective state. For Independent directors, the FHLB's Board of Directors nominates candidates to be placed on the ballot in an at-large election. For both Member and Independent director elections, a member is entitled to vote one share of required capital stock, subject to a statutory limitation, for each applicable directorship. Under this limitation, the total number of votes that a member may cast is limited to the average number of shares of the FHLB's capital stock that were required to be held by all members in that state as of the record date for voting. Nonmember stockholders are not eligible to vote in director elections. Due to these statutory limitations, no member owned more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the FHLB at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.


All transactions with stockholders are entered into in the ordinary course of business. Finance Agency regulations require the FHLB to offer the same pricing for Advances and other services to all members regardless of asset or transaction size, charter type, or geographic location. However, the FHLB may, in pricing its Advances, distinguish among members based upon its assessment of the credit and other risks to the FHLB of lending to any particular member or upon other reasonable criteria that may be applied equally to all members. The FHLB's policies and procedures require that such standards and criteria be applied consistently and without discrimination to all members applying for Advances.

Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions. In the ordinary course of its business, the FHLB provides products and services to members whose officers or directors serve as directors of the FHLB (Directors' Financial Institutions). Finance Agency regulations require that transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions be made on the same terms as those with any other member. The following table reflects balances with Directors' Financial Institutions for the items indicated below. The FHLB had no MBS or derivatives transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.
140

Table of Contents

Table 22.118.1 - Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions (dollars in millions)
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Balance
% of Total (1)
Balance
% of Total (1)
Advances$7,048 28.2 %$3,428 7.3 %
MPP159 1.7 122 1.1 
Regulatory capital stock467 17.6 176 5.2 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Balance 
% of Total (1)
 Balance 
% of Total (1)
Advances$3,428
 7.3% $3,424
 6.2%
MPP122
 1.1
 585
 5.7
Regulatory capital stock176
 5.2
 419
 9.6
(1)Percentage of total principal (Advances), unpaid principal balance (MPP), and regulatory capital stock.
(1)Percentage of total principal (Advances), unpaid principal balance (MPP), and regulatory capital stock.

Concentrations. The following table shows regulatory capital stock balances, outstanding Advance principal balances, and unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans held for portfolio of stockholders holding five percent or more of regulatory capital stock and includes any known affiliates that are members of the FHLB.

Table 22.218.2 - Stockholders Holding Five Percent or more of Regulatory Capital Stock (dollars in millions)
 Regulatory Capital Stock Advance MPP Unpaid
December 31, 2019Balance % of Total  Principal Principal Balance
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.$675
 20% $4,500
 $
U.S. Bank, N.A.485
 14
 13,874
 17
Regulatory Capital StockAdvanceMPP Unpaid
December 31, 2020Balance% of Total PrincipalPrincipal Balance
U.S. Bank, N.A.$288 11 %$4,273 $13 
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.163 
Third Federal Savings & Loan Association137 3,443 42 

Regulatory Capital StockAdvanceMPP Unpaid
December 31, 2019Balance% of TotalPrincipalPrincipal Balance
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.$675 20 %$4,500 $
U.S. Bank, N.A.485 14 13,874 17 
 Regulatory Capital Stock Advance MPP Unpaid
December 31, 2018Balance % of Total Principal Principal Balance
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.$1,085
 25% $23,400
 $
U.S. Bank, N.A.796
 18
 4,574
 19
The Huntington National Bank248
 6
 6
 486


Nonmember Affiliates. The FHLB has relationships with 3 nonmember affiliates, the Kentucky Housing Corporation, the Ohio Housing Finance Agency and the Tennessee Housing Development Agency. The FHLB had no investments in or borrowings to any of these nonmember affiliates at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019. The FHLB has executed standby bond purchase agreements with the Ohio Housing Finance Agency whereby the FHLB, for a fee, agrees as a liquidity provider if required, to purchase and hold the authority's bonds until the designated marketing agent can find a suitable investor or the housing authority repurchases the bond according to a schedule established by the standby agreement. For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the FHLB was not required to purchase any bonds under these agreements.



SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL DATA

Supplemental financial data required is set forth in the “Other Financial Information” caption at Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report.


Item 9.
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

.

There were no changes in or disagreements with our accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the two most recent fiscal years.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.


DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, these two officers each concluded that, as of
141

Table of Contents
December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is (1) accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of the FHLB is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The FHLB's internal control over financial reporting is designed by, or under the supervision of, the FHLB's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The FHLB's management assessed the effectiveness of the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2020. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management of the FHLB determined that, as of December 31, 2019,2020, the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

The effectiveness of the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192020 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 20192020 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information.
Item 9B.Other Information.

Not applicable.


PART III


Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.


NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

TheFor 2021, the Finance Agency has authorized us to have a total of 1817 directors: 10 Member directors and eightseven Independent directors. For 2020, an additional Independent director had been authorized. Two of our Independent directors are designated as Public Interest directors and all 1817 directors are elected by our members.

For both Member and Independent directorship elections, a member institution may cast one vote per seat or directorship up for election for each share of stock that the member was required to hold as of December 31 of the calendar year immediately preceding the election year. However, the number of votes that any member may cast for any one directorship cannot exceed the average number of shares of FHLB stock that were required to be held by all members located in its state. The election process is conducted by mail.electronically. Our Board of Directors does not solicit proxies nor is any member institution permitted to solicit proxies in an election.

142

Table of Contents
Finance Agency regulations also provide for two separate selection processes for Member and Independent director candidates.

Member director candidates are nominated by any officer or director of a member institution eligible to vote in the respective statewide election, including the candidate's own institution. After the FHLB determines that the candidate meets all Member director eligibility requirements per Finance Agency regulations, the candidate may run for election and the candidate's name is placed on the ballot.

Independent director candidates are self-nominated. Any individual may submit an Independent director application form to the FHLB and request to be considered for election. The FHLB reviews all application forms to determine that the individual satisfies the appropriate public interest or non-public interest Independent director eligibility requirements per Finance Agency regulations before forwarding the application form to the Board for review of the candidate's qualifications and skills. The Board then nominates an individual whose name will appear on the ballot after consultation with the Affordable Housing Advisory Council and after the nominee information has been submitted to the Finance Agency for review. As part of the nomination process, the Board may consider several factors including the individual's contributions and service on the Board, if a former or incumbent director, and the specific experience and qualifications of the candidate. The Board also considers diversity in nominating Independent directors and how the attributes of the candidate may add to the overall strength and skill set of the Board. These same factors are considered when the Board fills a Member or Independent director vacancy.



DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth certain information (ages as of March 1, 2020)2021) regarding each of our current directors.
NameAgeDirector SinceExpiration of Term as a DirectorIndependent or Member (State)
J. Lynn Anderson, Chair57
2017 (1)
12/31/24Independent (OH)
Grady P. Appleton73200712/31/21Independent (OH)
April Miller Boise52201912/31/22Independent (OH)
Brady T. Burt48201712/31/24Member (OH)
Greg W. Caudill62201412/31/21Member (KY)
Kristin H. Darby46202112/31/24Independent (TN)
James A. England, Vice Chair69201112/31/22Member (TN)
Robert T. Lameier68201612/31/23Member (OH)
Donald J. Mullineaux75201012/31/23Independent (KY)
Michael P. Pell57201912/31/22Member (OH)
Kathleen A. Rogers (2)
55202012/31/21Member (OH)
Charles J. Ruma79(2002-2004) 200712/31/23Independent (OH)
David E. Sartore60201412/31/21Member (KY)
William S. Stuard, Jr.66201112/31/22Member (TN)
Nancy E. Uridil69201512/31/22Independent (OH)
James J. Vance59201712/31/24Member (OH)
Jonathan D. Welty51202012/31/23Member (OH)
NameAgeDirector SinceExpiration of Term as a DirectorIndependent or Member (State)
J. Lynn Anderson56
2017 (1)
12/31/20Independent (OH)
Grady P. Appleton72200712/31/21Independent (OH)
April Miller Boise51201912/31/22Independent (OH)
Brady T. Burt47201712/31/20Member (OH)
Greg W. Caudill61201412/31/21Member (KY)
Leslie D. Dunn74200712/31/20Independent (OH)
James A. England, Vice Chair68201112/31/22Member (TN)
Robert T. Lameier67201612/31/23Member (OH)
Donald J. Mullineaux, Chair74201012/31/23Independent (KY)
Alvin J. Nance62200912/31/20Independent (TN)
Michael P. Pell56201912/31/22Member (OH)
Kathleen A. Rogers (2)
54202012/31/21Member (OH)
Charles J. Ruma78(2002-2004) 200712/31/23Independent (OH)
David E. Sartore59201412/31/21Member (KY)
William S. Stuard, Jr.65201112/31/22Member (TN)
Nancy E. Uridil68201512/31/22Independent (OH)
James J. Vance58201712/31/20Member (OH)
Jonathan D. Welty50202012/31/23Member (OH)
(1)Ms. Anderson, an Independent director beginning in 2017, also served as a Member director from 2012-2016.
(1)Ms. Anderson, an Independent director beginning in 2017, also served as a Member director from 2011-2016.
(2)Ms. Rogers was elected by the Board on November 21, 2019 to fill the Ohio Member director vacancy that resulted from the retirement of Director DuHamel. Ms. Rogers' term commenced on January 1, 2020 and will end on December 31, 2021 (what would have been the end of Director DuHamel's term).
(2)Ms. Rogers was elected by the Board on November 21, 2019 to fill an Ohio Member director vacancy. Ms. Rogers' term commenced on January 1, 2020 and will end on December 31, 2021 (what would have been the end of the unexpired term).

Member Directors

Finance Agency regulations govern the eligibility requirements for our Member directors. Each Member director, and each nominee to a Member directorship, must be a U.S. citizen and an officer or director of a member that: is located in the voting state to be represented by the Member directorship, was a member of the FHLB as of the record date, and meets all minimum capital requirements established by its appropriate Federal banking agency or state regulator.

143

Table of Contents
Generally, each Member director is nominated and elected by our members through an annual voting process administered by us. Any member that is entitled to vote in the election may nominate an eligible individual to fill each available Member directorship for its voting state, and all eligible nominees must be presented to the membership in the voting state. Our directors are not permitted to nominate or elect Member directors, except to fill a vacancy for the remainder of an unexpired term or to fill a vacancy for which no nominations were received. In accordance with Finance Agency regulations, except when acting in a personal capacity, no director, officer, attorney, employee or agent of the FHLB may communicate in any manner that he or she directly or indirectly, supports or opposes the nomination or election of a particular individual for a Member directorship or take any other action to influence the voting with respect to a particular individual. As a result, the FHLB is not in a position to know which factors its member institutions considered in nominating candidates for Member directorships or in voting to elect Member directors. However, if the Board takes action to fill a vacant Member directorship, facts considered in electing such director may be communicated to the FHLB.

Mr. Burt has been the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Park National Bank, Newark, Ohio, a subsidiary of Park National Corporation, since December 2012. He also serves as the Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Park National Corporation.


Mr. Caudill has beenserved on the Board of Directors of Farmers National Bank, Danville, Kentucky since 1996. Previously, Mr. Caudill was Chief Executive Officer of Farmers National Bank Danville, Kentucky sincefrom December 2002.2002 to December 2020. He also served as President of Farmers National Bank from December 2002 until April 2016.

Mr. England has been Chairman of Decatur County Bank, Decaturville, Tennessee since 1990. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of Decatur County Bank from 1990 to 2013.

Mr. Lameier has been President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Miami Savings Bank, Miamitown, Ohio since 1993.

Mr. Pell has been President and Chief Executive Officer of First State Bank, Winchester, Ohio since March 2006.

Ms. Rogers has been Executive Vice President, Director of Capital Stress Testing and Financial Systems of U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank, N.A., Cincinnati, Ohio since August 2016. She also served as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp from January 2015 to August 2016.

Mr. Sartore became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Field & Main Bank, Henderson, Kentucky in January 2015 when Ohio Valley Financial Group and BankTrust Financial merged to form Field & Main Bank. Previously, Mr. Sartore was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ohio Valley Financial Group since 1992.

Mr. Stuard has been Chairman of F&M Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee, since January 2016 and President and Chief Executive Officer of F&M Bank since January 1991.

Mr. Vance has been Senior Vice President and Co-Chief Investment Officer of Western-Southern Life Assurance Company and related subsidiaries (Cincinnati, Ohio) since October 2020. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Western-Southern Life Assurance Company and related subsidiaries (Cincinnati, Ohio) sincefrom March 2016. Previously, he served2016 to October 2020 and as Vice President and Treasurer of Western-Southern Life Assurance Company and related subsidiaries from 1999 to March 2016.

Mr. Welty has been President of Ohio Capital Finance Corporation (OCFC), Columbus, Ohio since August 2019 and Executive Vice President of Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing (OCCH), an affiliate of OCFC, since May 2000.November 2020. Prior to serving as President of OCFC, Mr. Welty served as Executive Director from January 2010 to August 2019.2019 and as Vice President of OCCH from May 2000 until November 2020.

Independent Directors

Finance Agency regulations also govern the eligibility requirements of our Independent directors. Each Independent director, and each nominee to an Independent directorship, must be a U.S. citizen and bona fide resident of our District. At least two of our Independent directors must be designated by our Board as public interest directors. Public interest Independent directors must have more than four years experience representing consumer or community interest in banking services, credit needs, housing, or consumer financial protections. All other Independent directors must have knowledge of or experience in one or more of the following areas: auditing and accounting; derivatives; financial management; organizational management; project development; risk management practices; and the law. Our Board of Directors nominates candidates for Independent
144

Table of Contents
directorships. Directors, officers, employees, attorneys, or agents of the FHLB are permitted to support directly or indirectly the nomination or election of a particular individual for an Independent directorship.

Ms. Anderson served as President of Nationwide Bank from November 2009 to March 2016. Prior to retiring, she served as Senior Vice President-Member Solutions Integration for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company from March 2016 to December 2016. Ms. Anderson is a Certified Public Accountant and has over 10 years of experience serving on the board of National Church Residences, a leading national non-profit provider of senior housing. Ms. Anderson's leadership positions within the banking and insurance industries contribute skills to the Board in the areas of auditing and accounting, operations and corporate governance. In addition, her non-profit housing experience provides public interest viewpoints that connect to the FHLB's mission.

Mr. Appleton was the President and Chief Executive Officer ofis retired from East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation (EANDC), where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2014 to January 2018. He also served as Executive Director of EANDC for more than 30 years. EANDC improves communities by providing quality and affordable housing, comprehensive homeownership services and economic development opportunities. Mr. Appleton's years of experience with EANDC bring insight to the Board that contributes to the FHLB's corporate objective of maximizing the effectiveness of contributions to Housing and Community Investment programs. Mr. Appleton also served as a member of the FHLB's Affordable Housing Advisory Council from 1997 until 2006.

Ms. Boise has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Eaton Corporation since January 2020. She was formerly the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary of Meritor Incorporated from August 2016 to

December 2019. Previously, Ms. Boise served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Head of Global Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Secretary of Avintiv Incorporated from March 2015 to December 2015. She also served as Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Privacy Officer of Veyance Technologies Incorporated from January 2011 to January 2015. Ms. Boise has 26over 25 years of legal experience and expertise leading corporate development and implementing strategic growth plans, while mitigating related risks. Her knowledge and background offers the Board valuable insight on the FHLB’s governance and risk management corporate objectives.

Ms. DunnDarby has been the Chief Information Officer of Envision Healthcare since November 2018. Previously, she was Senior Vice Presidentthe Chief Information Officer of Business Development, General CounselCancer Treatment Centers of America from April 2014 to November 2018. Ms. Darby is a Certified Public Accountant and Secretary of Cole National Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange listed retailer now owned by EssilorLuxottica, from September 1997 until October 2004. Prior to joining Cole, she had been a partner since 1985 inCertified Fraud Examiner and serves as the Business PracticeChair of the Jones Day law firm. She currently is engaged in various public and private company board activities and serves in leadership positions with a number of civic and philanthropic organizations. Ms. Dunn has servedNominating Committee on the Nashville Technology Council. Serving as a director of New York Community Bancorp, Inc. since September 2015 and serves on its Audit, Risk Assessment, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.technology leader at a large public organization, Ms. Dunn's experience as a director and senior officer of publicly held companies and as a law firm partner representing numerous publicly held companies brings perspective toDarby offers the Board regarding the FHLB's status as an SEC registrant, corporate governance matters,comprehensive knowledge on technology strategy and the Board's responsibility to oversee the FHLB's operations.operations, and digital and cyber security.

Dr. Mullineaux is the Emeritus duPont Endowed Chair in Banking and Financial Services in the Gatton College of Business and Economics at the University of Kentucky. He heldwas the duPont Endowed Chair from 1984 until 2014. Previously, he was on the staff of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, where he served as Senior Vice President and Director of Research from 1979 until 1984. He also served as a director of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation from 2005 until 2009. He has published numerous articles and lectured on a variety of banking topics, including risk management, financial markets and economics. He served as the Curriculum Director for the ABA's Stonier Graduate School of Banking from 2001 to 2016. Dr. Mullineaux brings knowledge and experience to the Board in areas vital to the operation of financial institutions in today's economy.

Mr. Nance
has been Chief Executive Officer of LHP Development LLC and LHP Management LLC since April 2015. Previously, he was Executive Director and the Chief Executive Officer of Knoxville's Community Development Corporation (KCDC) from 2000 to 2015. The KCDC is the public housing and redevelopment authority for the City of Knoxville and Knox County, which strives to improve Knoxville's neighborhoods and communities, including through providing quality affordable housing. Mr. Nance also served as Chairman of the Legislative Committee for the Tennessee Association of Housing and Redevelopment Authorities, which provides assistance and support to the state's public and affordable housing agencies. In addition, Mr. Nance served an eight-year term where he held the office of Vice Chairman on the Tennessee Housing Development Agency, the state's housing finance agency, which promotes the production of affordable housing for very low, low, and moderate, income individuals and families in the state. Mr. Nance also serves on the Board of Knoxville Habitat for Humanity. Mr. Nance's depth of experience with these organizations brings insight to the Board that contributes to the FHLB's corporate objective of maximizing the effectiveness of its contributions to Housing and Community Investment programs.

Mr. Ruma has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Virginia Homes Ltd.Davidson Phillips, Inc., a homebuilder, since 1975. He served on the board of the Ohio Housing Finance Agency (OHFA), the state's housing agency, from 2004 to 2009. OHFA helps Ohio's first-time homebuyers, renters, senior citizens, and others find quality, affordable housing that meets their needs. OHFA's programs also support developers and property managers of affordable housing throughout the state. Mr. Ruma's years of experience in the home building industry and with the OHFA bring insight to the Board that contributes to the FHLB's mission and corporate objectives.

Ms. Uridil is a retired global consumer packaged goods executive. She was the Senior Vice President of Global Operation for Moen Incorporated from September 2005 until March 2014. Ms. Uridil served on the Board of Directors of Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (Nasdaq: FLXS) from December 2010 to December 2019, where she served on the Compensation Committee and chaired the Nominations and Governance Committee. Ms. Uridil also served as a Senior Vice President of Estée Lauder Companies, from 2000 to 2005. In addition, Ms. Uridil served as a Senior Vice President of Mary Kay, Incorporated, from 1996 to 2000. Serving on executive teams for global businesses for more than 18 years, Ms. Uridil has extensive experience in strategy, expense and capital management, merger and acquisition integration and sourcing. Ms. Uridil's qualifications and insight provide valuable skills to the Board in the important areas of personnel, compensation, information technology and operations.



145


Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information (ages as of March 1, 2020)2021) regarding our executive officers.
NameAgePositionEmployee of the FHLB SinceNameAgePositionEmployee of the FHLB Since
Andrew S. Howell58President and Chief Executive Officer1989Andrew S. Howell59President and Chief Executive Officer1989
Stephen J. Sponaugle57Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer1992Stephen J. Sponaugle58Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer1992
R. Kyle Lawler62Executive Vice President-Chief Business Officer2000R. Kyle Lawler63Executive Vice President, Chief Business Officer2000
Roger B. Batsel48Executive Vice President-Chief Operating Officer2014Roger B. Batsel49Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer2014
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr.66Executive Vice President-Chief Risk and Compliance Officer2006
Damon v. Allen49Senior Vice President-Housing and Community Investment Officer1999Damon v. Allen50Senior Vice President, Housing and Community Investment Officer1999
J. Christopher Bates44Senior Vice President-Chief Accounting Officer2005J. Christopher Bates45Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer2005
David C. Eastland62Senior Vice President-Chief Credit Officer1999David C. Eastland63Senior Vice President, Chief Credit Officer1999
James C. FrondorfJames C. Frondorf43Senior Vice President, Assistant Chief Credit Officer2001
Tami L. Hendrickson59Senior Vice President-Treasurer2006Tami L. Hendrickson60Senior Vice President, Treasurer2006
Bridget C. Hoffman43Senior Vice President-General Counsel2018Bridget C. Hoffman44Senior Vice President, General Counsel2018
Reema Singh43Senior Vice President-Chief Audit Executive2018
Amy L. KonowAmy L. Konow46Senior Vice President, Chief Audit Executive2020
Daniel A. Tully42Senior Vice President-Assistant Chief Risk and Compliance Officer2006Daniel A. Tully43Senior Vice President, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer2006
                            
Mr. Howell became President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2012. Previously, he served as the Executive Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Operating Officer since January 2008.

Mr. Sponaugle became Executive Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Financial Officer in January 2018. Previously, he served as the Executive Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer since January 2017. Mr. Sponaugle also served as the FHLB's Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer from November 2015 to December 2016, and as Senior Vice President-Chief Risk Officer from January 2007 to October 2015.2016.

Mr. Lawler became Executive Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Business Officer in August 2012. Previously, he served as the Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Credit Officer since May 2007.

Mr. Batsel became Executive Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Operating Officer in January 2020. Previously, he served as the FHLB's Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Information and Operations Officer since July 2018. Mr. Batsel also served as the FHLB's Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Information Officer since January 2014.

Mr. Dooley became the Executive Vice President-Chief Risk and Compliance Officer in January 2018. Previously, he served as the FHLB's Senior Vice President-Internal Audit since January 2013.

Mr. Allen became Senior Vice President-HousingPresident, Housing and Community Investment Officer in January 2012. Previously, he served as the FHLB's Vice President and Community Investment Officer since July 2011.

Mr. Bates became Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Accounting Officer in January 2015. Previously, he served as the FHLB's Vice President-ControllerPresident, Controller since January 2013.

Mr. Eastland became the Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Credit Officer in January 2015. Prior to that, he served as the FHLB's Vice President-CreditPresident, Credit Risk Management since January 2002.

Mr. Frondorf became Senior Vice President, Assistant Chief Credit Officer in January 2021. Previously, he served as the FHLB’s First Vice President, Credit Services since January 2018. Mr. Frondorf also served as the FHLB’s Vice President, Credit Services since January 2014.

Ms. Hendrickson became Senior Vice President-TreasurerPresident, Treasurer in January 2015. Previously, she served as the FHLB's Vice President-TreasurerPresident, Treasurer since January 2010.

Ms. Hoffman became Senior Vice President-GeneralPresident, General Counsel in May 2018. Previously, she was a partner of the law firm Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP from January 2011 to May 2018.

Ms. SinghKonow became Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident, Chief Audit Executive in July 2019.2020. Previously, she served aswas the FHLB's FirstChief Financial Officer at Landrum & Brown, Inc. from November 2019 to June 2020 and the Vice President-Internal Audit since January 2018.President, Accounting and Finance from April 2018 to November 2019. Prior to that, she served as Managing Director, Internal AuditVice President, Operations - Financial Institutions Division at Protiviti, Inc.American Modern Insurance Group from October 2015November 2013 to JanuaryFebruary 2018. Ms. Singh also worked at Deloitte & Touche LLP from January 2001 to September 2015, with her last position being Senior Manager, Advisory and Risk Services.

146

Table of Contents

Mr. Tully became Senior Vice President-AssistantPresident, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer in April 2020. Previously, he served as the Senior Vice President, Assistant Chief Risk and Compliance Officer since January 2020. Previously,Prior to that, he served as the FHLB's First Vice President-AssistantPresident, Assistant Chief Risk and Compliance Officer since July 2018. Mr. Tully also served as the FHLB's First Vice President-FinancialPresident, Financial and Market Risk Analysis since January 2018 and as Vice President-FinancialPresident, Financial and Market Risk Analysis since 2014.

All officers are appointed annually by our Board of Directors.


AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Board of Directors has determined (1) that Ms. J. Lynn Anderson,Mr. Brady T. Burt, Chair of the Audit Committee, and Committee member Mr. David E. Sartore, have the relevant accounting and related financial management expertise, and therefore are qualified, to serve as the Audit Committee financial experts within the meaning of the regulations of the SEC and (2) that each is independent under SEC Rule 10A-3(b)(1). Ms. AndersonMr. Burt is a Certified Public Accountant and his experience has experienceprincipally been in the internal auditaccounting and finance disciplines within the financial industry, and is a Certified Public Accountant.has included managing various accounting functions. Mr. Sartore's experience has principally been in the accounting and finance disciplines within the financial industry and he is a Certified Public Accountant. For additional information regarding the independence of the directors of the FHLB, see Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

CODES OF ETHICS

The Board of Directors has adopted a “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” that applies to the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as well as all other executive officers. This policy serves to promote honest and ethical conduct, full, fair and accurate disclosure in the FHLB's reports to regulatory authorities and other public communications, and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The Code is posted on the FHLB's website (www.fhlbcin.com). If a waiver of any provision of the Code is granted to a covered officer, or if any amendment is made to the Code, information concerning the waiver or amendment will be posted on our website.

The Board of Directors has also adopted a “Standards of Conduct” policy that applies to all employees. The purpose of this policy is to promote a strong ethical climate that protects the FHLB against fraudulent activities and fosters an environment in which open communication is expected and protected.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.
Executive Compensation.
 
2019
2020 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
 
The following provides discussion and analysis regarding our compensation program for executive officers for 2019,2020, and in particular our Named Executive Officers. Named Executive Officers for 20192020 were: Andrew S. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO); Stephen J. Sponaugle, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; R. Kyle Lawler, Executive Vice President, Chief Business Officer; J. Gregory Dooley, Sr., Executive Vice President, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer and Roger B. Batsel, Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Operations Officer. Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Batsel was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Dooley has announced his retirement effective April 3, 2020.Officer and Tami L. Hendrickson, Senior Vice President, Treasurer.
 
Compensation Program Overview (Philosophy and Objectives)
 
Our Board of Directors (the Board) is responsible for determining the philosophy and objectives of the compensation program. The philosophy of the program is to provide a flexible and market-based approach to compensation that attracts, retains and motivates high performing, accomplished financial services executives who, by their individual and collective performance, achieve strategic business initiatives to fulfill our mission. The program is primarily designed to focus executives on increasing business with member institutions within established profitability and risk tolerance levels, while also encouraging teamwork.
 
We compensate executive officers using a combination of base salary, short-term and deferred incentive-based cash compensation, retirement benefits and modest fringe benefits. We believe the compensation program communicates short and long-term goals and standards of performance for our mission and key business objectives and appropriately motivates and

rewards executives commensurate with their contributions and achievements. The combination of base salary and short-term
147

Table of Contents
and deferred incentive pay creates a total compensation opportunity for executives who contribute to and influence strategic plans and who are primarily responsible for the strategic business plan, execution, and performance.

Oversight of the compensation program is the responsibility of the Board's Human Resources, Compensation and Inclusion Committee (the Committee). The Committee annually reviews the components of the compensation program to ensure it is consistent with and supports our mission, strategic business objectives, and short and long-term goals. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee may engage executive compensation consultants to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the program and in determining the appropriate mix of compensation provided to executive officers. Because individuals are not permitted to own our capital stock, all compensation is paid in cash and we have no equity compensation plans or arrangements.
 
The Committee recommends the CEO's annual compensation package to the Board, which is responsible for approving all compensation provided to the CEO. Additionally, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation program's budget for all officers, including the other Named Executive Officers, and submitting its recommendations to the Board for final approval.
 
Management Involvement - Executive Compensation
 
While the Board is ultimately responsible for determining the compensation of the CEO and all other executive officers, the CEO and the Human Resources department periodically advise the Committee regarding competitive and administrative issues affecting the compensation program. The CEO and the Human Resources department also present recommendations to the Committee regarding the compensation of all other executive officers, and administer programs approved by the Committee and the Board.
 
Finance Agency Oversight - Executive Compensation
 
The Director of the Finance Agency is required by regulation to prohibit an FHLBank from paying compensation to its executive officers that is not reasonable and comparable to that paid for employment in similar businesses involving similar duties and responsibilities. Finance Agency rules direct the FHLBanks to provide all compensation actions affecting their Named Executive Officers to the Finance Agency for review. Accordingly, following our Board's November 20192020 and January 20202021 meetings, we submitted the 20202021 base salaries as well as incentive payments earned for 20192020 for the Named Executive Officers to the Finance Agency. At this time, we do not expect the regulatory requirements to have a material impact on our executive compensation programs.
 
Use of Comparative Compensation Data
 
The compensation program aims to provide a market competitive compensation package when recruiting and retaining highly talented executives seeking stable, long-term employment. To this end, we gather compensation data from a wide variety of sources, including broad-based national and regional surveys, information on compensation programs at other FHLBanks, and formal and informal interactions with our compensation consultant. Our consultant, McLagan, is a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm specializing in the financial services industry. We also participate in multiple surveys including the annual McLagan Federal Home Loan Bank Custom Survey and the annual Federal Home Loan Bank System Key Position Compensation Survey. Both surveys contain executive and non-executive compensation information for various key positions across all FHLBanks. When determining the compensation program, the Committee and the CEO use compensation data collected from these sources to inform themselves regarding trends in compensation practices and as a comparison check against general market data (market check).
 
In setting 2020 and 2021 compensation, we primarily relied upon information from the McLagan Custom Survey. It encompasses information relating to 2019the prior year's compensation from mortgage banks, commercial financial institutions that typically had assets of less than $20 billion, and other FHLBanks. However, we believe the positions at other FHLBanks generally are more directly comparable to ours given the unique nature of the FHLBank System. The FHLBanks share the same public policy mission, interact routinely with each other, and share a common regulator and regulatory constraints, including the need for Finance Agency review of all compensation actions affecting executive officers. However, there are significant differences across the FHLBank System, including the sizes of the various FHLBanks, the complexity of their operations, their organizational and cost structures and the types of compensation packages offered. Thus, we do not and, as a practical matter could not, calculate compensation packages for our Named Executive Officers based solely on comparisons to the other FHLBanks.


148

Table of Contents
Compensation Program Approach
 
The Committee utilizes a balanced approach for delivering base salary, short-term incentive and deferred pay with our compensation program. The annual (short-term) incentive compensation component rewards all officers and staff for the achievement of the annual strategic business goals. The deferred compensation component is provided to certain officers, including the Named Executive Officers, for maintaining the value of our members' capital stock above a minimum threshold over a three-year period. The Committee has not established or assigned specific percentages to each element of the compensation program. Instead, the Committee strives to create a program that generally delivers a total compensation opportunity, i.e., base salary, annual and deferred incentive compensation and other benefits (including a retirement plan), to each executive officer that, when target performance goals are met, is at or near the median of the other FHLBanks and is generally consistent with the market check. However, individual elements of compensation as well as total compensation for individual executives may vary from the median due to an executive's tenure, experience and responsibilities.
 
While the competitiveness of the compensation program is an important factor for attracting and retaining executives, the Committee also reviews all elements of the program to ensure it is well designed and fiscally responsible from both a regulatory and corporate governance perspective.

Impact of Risk-Taking on Compensation Program
 
The Committee reviews the overall program to ensure the compensation of executive officers does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking that could threaten our long-term value. Strong risk management is an integral part of our culture. The Committee believes that base salary is a sufficient percentage of total compensation to discourage excessive risk-taking by executive officers. The Committee also believes the mix of incentive goals, which include risk-related metrics, does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking and achieves an appropriate balance of incentive for meeting short and long-term organizational goals. Moreover, the Committee and the Board retain the discretion to reduce or withhold incentive compensation payments if a determination is made that an executive has caused us to incur such a risk that could threaten our long-term value.
 

149

Table of Contents
Elements of Total Compensation Program
 
The following table summarizes all compensation to our Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.2018. Discussion of each component follows the table.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary(1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
Change in Pension Value & Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3)
All Other Compensation(4)
Total
Andrew S. Howell2020$947,115 $785,578 $3,225,000 $36,097 $4,993,790 
President and CEO2019939,615 779,698 3,457,000 37,044 5,213,357 
2018901,538 722,867 192,000 34,233 1,850,638 
Stephen J. Sponaugle2020442,475 292,190 1,435,000 17,100 2,186,765 
Executive Vice President-2019419,250 259,314 1,377,000 16,800 2,072,364 
Chief Financial Officer2018405,231 245,058 193,000 16,500 859,789 
R. Kyle Lawler2020467,423 304,168 994,000 17,100 1,782,691 
Executive Vice President-2019440,577 303,275 994,000 16,800 1,754,652 
Chief Business Officer2018424,250 284,925 170,000 16,500 895,675 
Roger B. Batsel2020368,000 230,116 131,000 17,100 746,216 
Executive Vice President-2019341,000 205,659 88,000 16,406 651,065 
Chief Operating Officer2018316,635 190,309 26,000 12,375 545,319 
Tami L. Hendrickson (5)
2020322,500 182,224 254,000 10,224 768,948 
Senior Vice President-
Treasurer
Name and Principal PositionYear 
Salary(1)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
 
Change in Pension Value & Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3)
 
All Other Compensation(4)
 Total
Andrew S. Howell2019 $939,615
 $779,698
 $3,457,000
 $37,044
 $5,213,357
President and CEO2018 901,538
 722,867
 192,000
 34,233
 1,850,638
 2017 854,808
 650,066
 2,149,000
 32,837
 3,686,711
            
Stephen J. Sponaugle2019 419,250
 259,314
 1,377,000
 16,800
 2,072,364
Executive Vice President-2018 405,231
 245,058
 193,000
 16,500
 859,789
Chief Financial Officer2017 368,750
 215,949
 777,000
 16,200
 1,377,899
            
R. Kyle Lawler2019 440,577
 303,275
 994,000
 16,800
 1,754,652
Executive Vice President-2018 424,250
 284,925
 170,000
 16,500
 895,675
Chief Business Officer2017 404,654
 255,349
 661,000
 16,200
 1,337,203
            
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr.2019 315,923
 208,325
 177,000
 16,754
 718,002
Executive Vice President-2018 307,518
 194,570
 103,000
 16,382
 621,470
Chief Risk and Compliance Officer2017 262,014
 176,729
 99,000
 16,200
 553,943
            
Roger B. Batsel2019 341,000
 205,659
 88,000
 16,406
 651,065
Executive Vice President-2018 316,635
 190,309
 26,000
 12,375
 545,319
Chief Operating Officer2017 295,000
 168,365
 38,000
 11,980
 513,345
(1)Includes excess accrued vacation benefits automatically paid in accordance with established policy (applicable to all employees), which for 2019 were as follows: Mr. Howell, $64,615; Mr. Sponaugle $9,750; Mr. Lawler, $15,577 and Mr. Dooley, $6,923.
(2)Amounts shown for 2019 reflect total payments pursuant to the current portion of the 2019 Incentive Plan and the deferred portion of the 2016 Incentive Plan (2017 - 2019 performance period), as follows.
(1)Includes excess accrued vacation benefits automatically paid in accordance with established policy (applicable to all employees), which for 2020 were as follows: Mr. Howell, $47,115; Mr. Sponaugle, $20,475; Mr. Lawler, $29,423 and Ms. Hendrickson, $7,500.
Name 2019 Incentive Plan (current incentive) 
2016 Incentive Plan
 (three-year deferred incentive)
 Total
Andrew S. Howell $375,896
 $403,802
 $779,698
Stephen J. Sponaugle 140,735
 118,579
 259,314
R. Kyle Lawler 146,062
 157,213
 303,275
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. 108,616
 99,709
 208,325
Roger B. Batsel 102,544
 103,115
 205,659
(2)Amounts shown for 2020 reflect total payments pursuant to the current portion of the 2020 Incentive Plan and the deferred portion of the 2017 Incentive Plan (2018 - 2020 performance period), as follows.
(3)Represents change in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits only, which is primarily dependent on changes in interest rates, years of benefit service and salary. See "Retirement Benefits" and "2019 Pension Benefits" for additional information.
(4)Amounts represent matching contributions to the qualified defined contribution pension plan in 2019. For Mr. Howell, 2019 also includes perquisites totaling $20,244, which consisted of personal use of an FHLB-owned vehicle, premiums for an Executive long-term disability plan, guest travel expenses and an airline program membership. The value of perquisites are based on the actual cash cost.
Name2020 Incentive Plan (current incentive)2017 Incentive Plan
(three-year deferred incentive)
Total
Andrew S. Howell$397,057 $388,521 $785,578 
Stephen J. Sponaugle148,941 143,249 292,190 
R. Kyle Lawler154,588 149,580 304,168 
Roger B. Batsel129,882 100,234 230,116 
Tami L. Hendrickson97,280 84,944 182,224 
(3)    Represents change in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits only, which is primarily dependent on changes in interest rates, years of benefit service and salary. See "Retirement Benefits" and "2020 Pension Benefits" for additional information.
(4)    Amounts represent matching contributions to the qualified defined contribution pension plan in 2020. For Mr. Howell, 2020 also includes perquisites totaling $18,997, which consisted of personal use of an FHLB-owned vehicle, premiums for an Executive long-term disability plan and an airline program membership. The value of perquisites are based on the actual cash cost.
(5)    Ms. Hendrickson's 2018 and 2019 compensation amounts are not included as she was not a Named Executive Officer in those years.

Salary
Base salary is both a key component of the total compensation program and a key factor when attracting and retaining executive talent. While base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are influenced by a number of factors, the Board generally targets the median of the competitive market. Other factors affecting an executive's base salary include length of time in position, relevant experience, individual achievement, and the size and scope of assigned responsibilities as compared to the responsibilities of other executives. Base salary increases traditionally take effect at the beginning of each calendar year and are granted after a review of the individual's performance and leadership contributions to the achievement of our annual business plan goals and strategic objectives.
 
Each of the current Named Executive Officers received a base salary increase at the beginning of 2019.2020. For each of the current Named Executive Officers other than the CEO, total salary increases, including merit, market, and promotional adjustments,

150

Table of Contents
ranged from 3.003.05 percent to 5.007.92 percent. These increases were based on the CEO's recommendation for each executive, which took into consideration market data, and an evaluation of each executive's annual performance. For Mr. Howell, directors provided feedback to the Chair, and the Committee recommended, and the Board subsequently approved a salary increase of 4.172.86 percent. In recommending and approving Mr. Howell's 20192020 increase, the Committee and Board took into consideration competitive market analysis and the directors' appraisals of his performance during the year.

In October 2019,2020, the Committee recommended and the Board approved a 4.703.00 percent salary increase pool for 20202021 for all employees, comprised of 3.201.75 percent for merit increases and 1.501.25 percent for market and promotional adjustments. UsingAlthough the same process as described above was used, the CEO recommended smaller percentage increases for the other Named Executive Officers and other members of senior management in light of the current economic conditions and expected business trends for 2021. As a result, in November 2019,2020, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the following 20202021 base salaries and percent increases for the Named Executive Officers: Mr. Howell, $900,000 (2.86 percent); Mr. Sponaugle, $422,000 (3.05$426,000 (0.95 percent); Mr. Lawler, $438,000 (3.06$442,000 (0.91 percent); Mr. Dooley, $315,000 (1.94Batsel, $373,000 (1.36 percent); and Mr. Batsel, $368,000 (7.92Ms. Hendrickson, $320,000 (1.59 percent). Mr. Howell declined the salary increase approved by the Committee. In JanuaryDecember 2020, we were informed that the Finance Agency had completed its review and did not object to the Board-approved compensation actions affecting the Named Executive Officers in 2020.2021.
 
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (Incentive Plan)
The Incentive Plan is a cash-based total incentive award that is divided into two equal parts: (1) a current incentive award, and (2) a three-year deferred incentive award. The current component of the Incentive Plan is awarded annually and designed to promote and reward higher levels of performance for accomplishing Board-approved annual goals. The long-term component of the Incentive Plan is a three-year deferred incentive award that is designed to promote safety and soundness and serve as an employment retention tool for executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers.

The Incentive Plan annual goals generally reflect desired financial, operational, risk and public mission objectives for the current and future fiscal years. Each goal is weighted reflecting its relative importance and potential impact on our mission and annual strategic business plan. Each goal is assigned a quantitative threshold, target and maximum level of performance. Each Named Executive Officer's award opportunity is based entirely on bank-wide performance. However, the Chief Risk and Compliance Officer's award opportunity is weighted 75 percent on bank-wide goals and 25 percent on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) specific goals, which are developed with the Risk Committee in order to provide incentive and maintain a level of independence for risk management initiatives.
 
When establishing the Incentive Plan goals and corresponding performance levels, the Board anticipates that we will successfully achieve a threshold level of performance nearly every year. The target level is aligned with expected performance and is anticipated to be reasonably achievable in a majority of plan years. The maximum level of performance reflects a graduated level of difficulty from the target performance level and is designed to require superior performance to achieve.
 
Each Named Executive Officer is assigned a total incentive award opportunity, stated as a percentage of base salary, which corresponds to the individual's level of organizational responsibility and ability to contribute to and influence overall performance. The total incentive award opportunity established for executives is designed to be comparable to incentive opportunities for executives with similar duties and responsibilities at other financial institutions, primarily other FHLBanks, and generally consistent with our market check. The Board believes the total incentive opportunity and plan design provide an appropriate, competitive reward to all officers, including the Named Executive Officers, commensurate with the achievement levels expected for the incentive goals.
 
The total incentive award earned is determined based on the actual achievement level for each goal in comparison with the performance levels established for that goal.

The total incentive award opportunities for the 20192020 plan year stated as a percentage of base salary were as follows:
 Incentive OpportunityIncentive Opportunity
Name Threshold Target MaximumNameThresholdTargetMaximum
Andrew S. Howell 50.0% 75.0% 100.0%Andrew S. Howell50.0 %75.0 %100.0 %
Stephen J. Sponaugle 40.0
 60.0
 80.0
Stephen J. Sponaugle40.0 60.0 80.0 
R. Kyle Lawler 40.0
 60.0
 80.0
R. Kyle Lawler40.0 60.0 80.0 
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. 40.0
 60.0
 80.0
Roger B. Batsel 35.0
 52.5
 70.0
Roger B. Batsel40.0 60.0 80.0 
Tami L. HendricksonTami L. Hendrickson35.0 52.5 70.0 
 
If actual performance falls below the threshold level of performance, no payment is made for that goal. If actual performance exceeds the maximum level, only the value assigned as the performance maximum is paid. When actual performance falls

between the assigned threshold, target and maximum performance levels, an interpolated achievement is calculated for that
151

Table of Contents
goal. The achievement for each goal is then multiplied by the corresponding incentive weight assigned to that goal and the results for each goal are summed to arrive at the final incentive award payable to the executive. No final awards (or payments) will be made to executives under the Incentive Plan if we receive the lowest "Composite Rating" during the most recent examination by the Finance Agency. Such a rating would indicate that we have been found to be operating in an unacceptable manner, that we exhibit serious deficiencies in corporate governance, risk management or financial condition and performance, or that we are in substantial noncompliance with laws, Finance Agency regulations or supervisory guidance.

Fifty percent of the total opportunity for the Incentive Plan is awarded in cash following the plan year (current incentive award) and 50 percent is mandatorily deferred for three years after the end of the Plan year (deferred incentive award). The deferred incentive awards earned from 20172018 - 20192020 were calculated based on the actual performance or achievement level for each deferred plan goal at the end of the three-year performance period, with interpolations made for results between achievement levels. The achievement level for each goal was then multiplied by the corresponding incentive weight assigned to that goal. The final value of the deferred award was adjusted based on the goal achievement level determined using separate performance measures over the 20172018 - 20192020 deferral period. For all Named Executive Officers, the final value of the deferred award was 75 percent for a Threshold level of achievement, 100 percent for a Target level of achievement, or 125 percent for a Maximum level of achievement. If a goal achievement level over the three-year deferral period was below the threshold, no payment would be made for that deferred goal.

In 2018, the Board established a new safety and soundness metric to determine if the deferred portion of the 2018 Incentive Plan and future plans will be awarded rather than using the calculation described above. The safety and soundness metric is tied to our market capitalization ratio defined as the market value of total capital divided by the par value of capital stock. The market capitalization ratio is measured as the simple average at 36 month ends in the three-year performance period using the base-case interest rate and business environment used in reports to the Board at each month end. If our market capitalization ratio is greater than 100 percent during the deferred performance period, the final value will be 100 percent of the deferred award plus interest based on the annual interest rates applicable to the qualified defined benefit plan.
Except as noted above with respect to exam ratings, the Board has ultimate authority over the Incentive Plan and may modify or terminate the Plan at any time or for any reason. The Board also has discretion to increase or decrease any Incentive Plan awards. In addition, payments under the Plan are subject to certain claw back provisions that allow us to recover any incentive paid to a participant based on achievement of financial or operational goals that subsequently are deemed to be inaccurate, misstated or misleading. The Board believes these claw back requirements serve as a deterrent to any manipulation of financial statements or performance metrics in a manner that would assure and/or increase an incentive payment.

20192020 Incentive Plan. For calendar year 2019,2020, the Board approved a total of six performance measures in the functional areas of Franchise Value Promotion, Mission Asset Activity and Stockholder Risk/Return. The mix of financial and non-financial goals measures performance across our mission and corporate objectives and is intended to discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Because we consider risk management to be an essential component in the achievement of our mission and corporate objectives, the goals below include a separate risk-related metric.

At its January 20202021 meeting, following certification of the 20192020 performance results and in accordance with those results, the Board authorized the distribution to the Named Executive Officers of the current awards shown in Note 2 to the Summary Compensation Table. For the 20192020 plan year, we cumulatively achieved approximately 8688 percent of the available maximum incentive opportunity. This was lowerhigher than the 8886 percent overall performance achieved for 20182019 primarily due to not meetingexceeding the target performance level for twofive of the six goals in 2019.2020.
152


Table of Contents
The following table presents the incentive weights, threshold, target and maximum performance levels, and the actual results achieved for the 20192020 Incentive Plan performance measures for all Named Executive Officers.

20192020 Incentive Plan Performance Levels and Results
(Dollars in thousands)         (Dollars in thousands)   
Incentive Weight Threshold Performance Target Performance Maximum Performance Results AchievedIncentive WeightThreshold PerformanceTarget PerformanceMaximum PerformanceResults Achieved
Franchise Value Promotion         Franchise Value Promotion
1) Mission Outreach10.0% 90
 100
 118
 121
1) Mission Outreach10.0 %90100120107
2) Mission Asset Participation10.0
 65% 72% 80% 80%2) Mission Asset Participation15.0 65 %72 %80 %76 %
Mission Asset Activity         Mission Asset Activity 
3) Average Advance Balances for Members with Assets of $50 billion or Less15.0
 $20,000,000
 $22,000,000
 $24,000,000
 $21,601,334
3) Average Advance Balances for Members with Assets of $50 billion or Less15.0 $19,500,000 $21,500,000 $23,500,000 $20,230,778 
4) Mortgage Purchase Program New Mandatory Delivery Commitments15.0
 1,500,000
 1,800,000
 2,200,000
 3,550,647
4) Mortgage Purchase Program New Mandatory Delivery Commitments15.0 1,500,000 1,800,000 2,200,000 1,972,266 
Stockholder Risk/Return         Stockholder Risk/Return   
5) Decline in Market Value of Equity25.0
 < 7%
 < 5%
 3% or less
 3.0%5) Decline in Market Value of Equity20.0 < 7%< 5%3% or less2.3 %
6) Profitability-Available Earnings vs. Average 3-month LIBOR Rate25.0
 275 bps
 350 bps
 400 bps
 310
6) Profitability-Available Earnings vs. Average Short-term Rates (3-month LIBOR and Federal funds effective)6) Profitability-Available Earnings vs. Average Short-term Rates (3-month LIBOR and Federal funds effective)25.0 15 bps125 bps225 bps356 bps
 
During 2019,2020, the Board, the Committee and the CEO periodically reviewed the Incentive Plan goals presented above to determine progress toward the goals. Although the Board and the CEO discussed various external factors that were affecting achievement of the performance measures, the Board did not take any actions to revise or change the Incentive Plan goals.

The 2019 incentive program for the Chief Risk and Compliance Officer was weighted 75 percent on bank-wide goals, shown above, and 25 percent on the ERM department goal, as follows:

Implement specific initiatives of the ERM program within the ERM Department.

Weight of Goal:
100 percent

Threshold:3 initiatives satisfactorily completed*
Target:4 initiatives satisfactorily completed*    
Maximum:5 initiatives satisfactorily completed*    

2019 Results Achieved:4.75 initiatives satisfactorily completed*

*Specific initiatives include efforts in: 1) leading a data integrity project; 2) credit and collateral model migration; 3) leveraging technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness of risk management; 4) MPP credit modeling initiative; and 5) enhancing certain risk management practices.

20202021 Incentive Plan. At its November 2019December 2020 meeting, the Board established the 20202021 Incentive Plan goals, the incentive weights and the performance measures corresponding to each Incentive Plan goal and award opportunity for the 20202021 Incentive Plan. After that meeting, the 20202021 Incentive Plan was sent to the Finance Agency and we received notification of the completion of their review and non-objection in January 2020.2021. The 20202021 Incentive Plan goals for our executives are set forth below.


20202021 Incentive Plan Goals
Franchise Value Promotion
Mission OutreachWeight:    10.0%
Mission Asset ParticipationWeight:    15.0%
Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan AchievementWeight:    5.0%
Mission Asset Activity
Average Advances Balances for Members with Assets of $50 billion or LessWeight:    15.0%
Community Financial Institutions Participation in the Mortgage Purchase Program New Mandatory Delivery CommitmentsWeight:    15.0%
Stockholder Risk/Return
Decline in Market Value of EquityWeight:    20.0%
Profitability - Available Earnings vs. Average Short-term Rates (3-month LIBOR and Federal funds effective)Weight:    25.0%20.0%

As reflected above, the Board decided to keep allfive of the 20202021 goals the same as those in 20192020 although the performance metrics and the weighting of two goalsone goal and some of the performance metric calculations have been adjusted. Within the Franchise Value Promotion category, a new goal was added related to the achievement of the diversity and inclusion strategic plan. Additionally, the Mission Asset Activity goal related to the MPP changed the focus to the volume of Mandatory Delivery Contracts from Community Financial Institution participants rather than all MPP participants. Finally, the Decline in Market Value of Equity goal will be calculated separately based on two interest rate shock scenarios, with each scenario weighted equally. In setting the performance measures for the 20202021 Incentive Plan, the Board reviewed the results against target for 20192020 and considered relevant aspects of our financial outlook for 20202021 including the impact of the anticipated low interest rate environment, market volatility and changesreduction in member funding needs and changes in the mortgage market that continue to affect Mission Asset Activity and
153

Table of Contents
profitability. The Board also considered opportunities to increase mission asset participation by members that are a focus for strategic initiatives. Additionally, in light of the planned LIBOR replacement at the end of 2021, the Board added a Federal funds component to the average interest rates used to benchmark profitability.

The Board also approved a separate ERM department goal for the Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, whose annual incentive is weighted 75 percent on bank-wide goals and 25 percent on the ERM goal.

2020 ERM Goal


Implement specific initiatives of the ERM program within the ERM Department.

Weight of Goal:100 percent

Threshold:3 initiatives satisfactorily completed*
Target:4 initiatives satisfactorily completed*    
Maximum:5 initiatives satisfactorily completed*

*Specific initiatives include efforts in: 1) implementing a data management project; 2) credit and collateral model development; 3) improving the risk dashboard reporting; 4) enhancing market risk measures; and 5) governance risk compliance initiatives.

Three-Year Deferred Incentive Awards. During 2019,2020, the Board, the Committee and the CEO periodically reviewed progress toward the deferred plan goals for each ongoing performance period. At its January 20202021 meeting, following certification of the performance results for the deferred portion of the 20162017 Incentive Plan (2017(2018 - 20192020 performance period) and in accordance with those results, the Board authorized the distribution of payments to eligible officers including the Named Executive Officers. Cumulatively, we achieved approximately 8992 percent of the available maximum incentive opportunity. The deferred payments for the 20172018 - 20192020 performance period are shown in Note 2 to the Summary Compensation Table.


The following table presents, for all Named Executive Officers, the incentive weights, threshold, target and maximum performance levels, and the actual results achieved for each of the goals in the deferred portion of the 20162017 Incentive Plan (2017(2018 - 20192020 performance period):
 Incentive WeightThreshold PerformanceTarget PerformanceMaximum PerformanceResults Achieved
Operating Efficiency:   
Ranking of Operating Efficiency Ratio in comparison to other FHLBanks25%
6th
4th
1st
1st
Market Capitalization Ratio:
Ratio of Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock25%100%105%110%121%
Advance Utilization Ratio:  
Ranking of average of each member's Advances-to-assets ratio multiplied by the average member borrower penetration ratio in comparison to other FHLBanks25%
7th
4th
1st
5th
Strategic Business Plan Achievement:
Percentage of Strategic Business Plan strategies achieved25%70%80%100%94%
 Incentive Weight Threshold Performance Target Performance Maximum Performance Results Achieved
Operating Efficiency:         
Ranking of Operating Efficiency Ratio in comparison to other FHLBanks20% 
6th
 
4th
 
1st 
 
1st
Earnings Volatility Adjusted Profitability:         
Ranking of monthly volatility adjusted return on average equity (ROE) spread to average 3-month LIBOR in comparison to other FHLBanks20% 
9th
 
6th
 
1st
 
6th
Market Capitalization Ratio:         
Ratio of Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock20% 95% 100% 110% 117%
Advance Utilization Ratio:         
Ranking of average of each member's Advances-to-assets ratio multiplied by the average member borrower penetration ratio in comparison to other FHLBanks20% 
7th
 
4th
 
1st
 
5th
Strategic Business Plan Achievement:         
Percentage of Strategic Business Plan strategies achieved20% 70% 80% 100% 93%

As described above, the deferred portion of the 20192020 Incentive Plan (2020(2021 - 20222023 performance period) is based on a safety and soundness metric tied to the market capitalization ratio as defined in the 20202021 Incentive Plan. If our market capitalization ratio is greater than 100 percent during the 20202021 - 20222023 performance period, the final value will be 100 percent of the deferred award plus interest based on the annual interest rates applicable to the qualified defined benefit plan.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Grants
The following table provides information on grants made under our Incentive Plans.
 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name
Grant Date (1)
ThresholdTargetMaximum
Andrew S. HowellDecember 17, 2020$450,000 $675,000 $900,000 
Stephen J. SponaugleDecember 17, 2020170,400 255,600 340,800 
R. Kyle LawlerDecember 17, 2020176,800 265,200 353,600 
Roger B. BatselDecember 17, 2020149,200 223,800 298,400 
Tami L. HendricksonDecember 17, 2020112,000 168,000 224,000 
    
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name 
Grant Date (1)
 Threshold Target Maximum
Andrew S. Howell November 21, 2019 $450,000
 $675,000
 $900,000
Stephen J. Sponaugle November 21, 2019 168,800
 253,200
 337,600
R. Kyle Lawler November 21, 2019 175,200
 262,800
 350,400
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. November 21, 2019 126,000
 189,000
 252,000
Roger B. Batsel November 21, 2019 147,200
 220,800
 294,400
(1)Awards granted on this date are for the 2021 Incentive Plan.
(1)Awards granted on this date are for the 2020 Incentive Plan.

Under the awards shown above, 50 percent of the estimated future payout will be awarded in cash following the Plan year. The other 50 percent of the estimated future payout will be mandatorily deferred for three years after the end of the Plan year. If we operate in a safe and sound manner according to the market capitalization ratio metric during the deferred performance period, the final value will be 100 percent of the deferred award plus interest based on the annual interest rates applicable to the qualified defined benefit plan. See the "Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (Incentive Plan)" section above for further detail.

154

Table of Contents
Retirement Benefits
We maintain a comprehensive retirement program for executive officers comprised of two qualified retirement plans (a defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan) and a non-qualified pension plan. For our qualified plans, we participate in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions and the PentegraFidelity Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions.

Plan. The non-qualified plan, the Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP), restores benefits that eligible highly compensated employees would have received were it not for Internal Revenue Service limitations on benefits from the defined benefit plan. Benefits under the BEP vest and are payable according to the corresponding provisions of the qualified plans.
 
The plans provide benefits based on a combination of an employee's tenure and annual compensation. As such, the benefits provided by the plans are one component of the total compensation opportunity for executive officers and, the Board believes, serve as valuable retention tools since retirement benefits increase as executives' tenure and compensation grow.
 
Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (Pentegra DB) is a funded tax-qualified plan that is maintained on a non-contributory basis, meaning, employee contributions are not required. Participants' pension benefits vest upon completion of five years of service. The pension benefits payable under the Pentegra DB plan are determined using a pre-established formula that provides a single life annuity payable monthly at age 65 or normal retirement.

The benefit formula for employees hired prior to January 1, 2006, which includes Messrs. Howell, Sponaugle, and Lawler, is 2.50 percent for each year of benefit service multiplied by the highest three-year average compensation. Compensation is defined as base salary, excess accrued vacation benefits and annual incentive compensation, and excludes any deferred incentive payments. In the event of retirement prior to attainment of age 65, a reduced pension benefit is payable under the plan, with payments commencing as early as age 45.

For employees who were hired after January 1, 2006, which includes Messrs. DooleyMr. Batsel and Batsel,Ms. Hendrickson, the current benefit formula is 1.25 percent for each year of benefit service multiplied by the highest five-year average compensation. Beginning in 2006 through the end of 2017, compensation was defined as base salary only and excluded all other forms of compensation. Beginning January 1, 2018, compensation is defined as base salary, excess accrued vacation benefits and annual incentive compensation, and excludes any deferred incentive payments. In addition, the current plan provides for a reduced pension benefit in the event of retirement prior to attainment of age 65 with payment commencing as early as age 55 if the participant has 10 years or more of service.

Effective July 1, 2021, the Pentegra DB plan design that applies to future benefits for all employees will be adjusted. The revised benefit formula is 1.25 percent for each year of benefit service multiplied by the highest five-year average compensation. The plan maintains the reduced benefit for those retiring before age 65 and extends early retirement eligibility for all employees to as early as age 45 with 10 years of service. To offset future benefit losses, employees hired prior to January 1, 2006 will receive a transitional service credit in the form of a contribution to their Defined Contribution account. The contribution will be equal to 10 percent of their eligible pension income up to the IRS maximum. The contribution will continue for five years. Employees must remain employed for the entire plan year to receive each contribution.

Lastly, the Pentegra DB plan provides certain actuarially equivalent forms of benefit payments other than a single life annuity, including a limited lump sum distribution option, which is available only to employees hired prior to FebruaryJanuary 1, 2006.
 
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Executive officers and other employees whose pay exceeds IRS pension limitations are eligible to participate in the Defined Benefit component of the Benefit Equalization Plan (DB/BEP), an unfunded, non-qualified pension plan that mirrors the Pentegra DB plan in all material respects. In determining whether a restoration of retirement benefits is due an eligible employee, the DB/BEP utilizes the identical benefit formula applicable to the Pentegra DB plan. In the event that the benefits payable from the Pentegra DB plan have been reduced or otherwise limited, the executive's lost benefits are payable under the terms of the DB/BEP. Because the DB/BEP is a non-qualified plan, the benefits received from this plan do not receive the same tax treatment and funding protection associated with the qualified plan.
 

155

Table of Contents
The following table provides the present value of benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers upon retirement at age 65 from the Pentegra DB plan and the DB/BEP, and is calculated in accordance with the formula currently in effect for specified years-of-service and remuneration for participating in both plans. Our pension benefits do not include any reduction for a participant's Social Security benefits.
 
20192020 Pension Benefits

Name Plan Name
Number of Years Credited Service (1)
Present Value (2) of Accumulated Benefits
Andrew S. HowellPentegra DB30.50 $2,991,000 
 DB/BEP30.50 13,771,000 
Stephen J. SponauglePentegra DB27.33 2,936,000 
 DB/BEP27.33 3,281,000 
R. Kyle LawlerPentegra DB19.50 2,439,000 
 DB/BEP19.50 2,743,000 
Roger B. BatselPentegra DB5.92 234,000 
 DB/BEP5.92 92,000 
Tami L. HendricksonPentegra DB13.92 703,000 
DB/BEP13.92 176,000 
(1)For pension plan purposes, the calculation of credited service begins upon completion of a required waiting period following the date of employment. Accordingly, the years shown are less than the executive's actual years of employment. Because IRS regulations generally prohibit the crediting of additional years of service under the qualified plan, such additional service also is precluded under the DB/BEP, which only restores those benefits lost under the qualified plan.
Name  Plan Name 
Number of Years Credited Service (1)
 
Present Value (2) of Accumulated Benefits
Andrew S. Howell Pentegra DB 29.50
 $2,630,000
  DB/BEP 29.50
 10,907,000
       
Stephen J. Sponaugle Pentegra DB 26.33
 2,485,000
  DB/BEP 26.33
 2,297,000
       
R. Kyle Lawler Pentegra DB 18.50
 2,027,000
  DB/BEP 18.50
 2,161,000
       
J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. Pentegra DB 12.33
 589,000
  DB/BEP 12.33
 123,000
       
Roger B. Batsel Pentegra DB 4.92
 156,000
  DB/BEP 4.92
 39,000
(2)See Note 13 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details regarding valuation assumptions.
(1)For pension plan purposes, the calculation of credited service begins upon completion of a required waiting period following the date of employment. Accordingly, the years shown are less than the executive's actual years of employment. Because IRS regulations generally prohibit the crediting of additional years of service under the qualified plan, such additional service also is precluded under the DB/BEP, which only restores those benefits lost under the qualified plan.
(2)See Note 17 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details regarding valuation assumptions.
 
Qualified Defined Contribution Plan. The PentegraOur Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions (Pentegra DC)(DC) is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan to which we make tenure-based matching contributions. Matching contributions begin immediately and subsequently increase based on length of employment to a maximum of six percent of eligible compensation. Eligible compensation in the Pentegra DC plan is defined as base salary and annual bonus (current incentive award) and excludes any deferred incentive awards.
 
Under the Pentegra DC plan, a participant may elect to contribute up to 75 percent of eligible compensation on either a before-tax or after-tax basis. The plan permits participants to self-direct investment elections into one or more investment funds. All returns are at the market rate of the related fund. Investment fund elections may be changed daily by the participants. A participant may withdraw vested account balances while employed, subject to certain plan limitations, which include those under IRS regulations. Participants also are permitted to revise their contribution/deferral election once each pay period. However, the revised election is only applicable to future earnings and may also be limited by IRS regulations.  

Fringe Benefits and Perquisites
Executive officers are eligible to participate in the traditional fringe benefit plans made available to all other employees, including participation in the retirement plans, medical, dental and vision insurance program and group term life and standard long term disability (LTD) insurance plans, as well as annual leave (i.e., vacation) and sick leave policies. Executives participate in our subsidized medical, dental and vision insurance and group term life and standard LTD insurance programs on the same basis and terms as all of our employees. However, executives are required to pay higher premiums for medical coverage. Executive officers also receive on-site parking at our expense.

During 2019,2020, the CEO was also provided with an FHLB-owned vehicle for his business and personal use, along with the operating expenses associated with the vehicle. An executive officer's personal use of an FHLB-owned vehicle, including use for the daily commute to and from work, is reported as a taxable fringe benefit. In addition to the standard LTD insurance plan provided to all employees, Named Executive Officers may elect to receive additional LTD coverage. The premiums the FHLB pays for the additional LTD coverage are considered a taxable fringe benefit. Additionally, with prior approval, our current Travel Policy permits a guest to accompany an executive officer on authorized business trips. Executive officers are reimbursed

for transportation and other related expenses associated with their guest's travel. Such reimbursements are reported as a taxable fringe benefit.

156

Table of Contents
The perquisites provided to an executive officer represent a small fraction of annual compensation. During 2019,2020, perquisites totaled $20,244$18,997 for Mr. Howell, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table. Perquisites did not individually or collectively exceed $10,000 for any other Named Executive Officers and are therefore excluded from the Summary Compensation Table.

Employment Arrangements and Severance Benefits
 
Pursuant to the FHLBank Act, all employees of the FHLB are “at will” employees. Accordingly, an employee may resign employment at any time and an employee's employment may be terminated at any time for any reason, with or without cause and with or without notice.

We have no employment agreements with any Named Executive Officer. Other than normal pension benefits and eligibility to participate in our retiree medical and life insurance programs (if hired prior to August 1, 1990), no perquisites, tax gross-ups or other special benefits are provided to our executive officers in the event of a resignation, retirement or other termination of employment. However, Named Executive Officers may receive certain benefits under our severance policy and Change in Control Plan, described below.
 
Severance Policy. We have a severance policy under which all employees may receive benefits in the event of termination of employment resulting from job elimination, substantial job modification, job relocation, or a planned reduction in staff. Under this policy, an executive officer is entitled to one month's pay for each year of continuous employment, rounded to the next whole year for partial years, with a minimum of one month and a maximum of six months' severance pay, as well as payment for all unused, accrued vacation benefits. At our discretion, executive officers and employees receiving benefits under this policy may also receive outplacement assistance as well as continuation of health insurance coverage on a limited basis.

Executive Change in Control Plan (Change in Control Plan). We have a Change in Control Plan that provides certain payments and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination within 24 months following a change in control. The purpose of the Change in Control Plan is to facilitate the hiring and retention of senior executives by providing them with certain protection and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination following a defined change in control. Change in control benefit payments are in lieu of, not in addition to, the severance benefit payments described above. The Change in Control Plan applies to officers as designated by the Board. Current designees are the CEO, all Executive Vice Presidents, and all Senior Vice Presidents.

Under the Change in Control Plan, a “qualifying termination” is defined as any separation, termination or other discontinuation of the employment relationship between the FHLB and a participant, (a) by the FHLB, other than for “cause” (as defined in the Change in Control Plan), death or disability; or (b) by the participant, for “good reason” (as defined in the Change in Control Plan).
“Change in Control” is defined under the Change in Control Plan as:
the merger, reorganization, or consolidation of the FHLB with or into, or acquisition of the FHLB by, another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity;
the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the FHLB to another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity;
a change in the composition of the board that causes the combined number of Member directors from the jurisdictions of Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee to cease to constitute a majority of the Bank’s directors; or
liquidation or dissolution.
the merger, reorganization, or consolidation of the FHLB with or into, or acquisition of the FHLB by, another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity;
the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the FHLB to another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity;
a change in the composition of the board that causes the combined number of Member directors from the jurisdictions of Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee to cease to constitute a majority of the Bank’s directors; or
liquidation or dissolution.
“Cause” is defined in the Change in Control Plan to include:
the participant’s failure to perform substantially his/her duties;
the participant’s engagement in illegal conduct or willful misconduct injurious to the FHLB;
the participant’s material violation of law or regulation or of the FHLB’s written policies or guidelines;
a written request from the Finance Agency requesting that the FHLB terminate the participant’s employment;

the participant’s failure to perform substantially his/her duties;
crimes involving a felony, fraud or other dishonest acts;
certain other notices from or actions by the Finance Agency;
the participant’s breach of fiduciary duty or breach of certain covenants in the Change in Control Plan; or
the participant’s refusal to comply with a lawful directive from the CEO or the Board of Directors.
the participant’s engagement in illegal conduct or willful misconduct injurious to the FHLB;
the participant’s material violation of law or regulation or of the FHLB’s written policies or guidelines;
a written request from the Finance Agency requesting that the FHLB terminate the participant’s employment;
crimes involving a felony, fraud or other dishonest acts;
certain other notices from or actions by the Finance Agency;
157

Table of Contents
the participant’s breach of fiduciary duty or breach of certain covenants in the Change in Control Plan; or
the participant’s refusal to comply with a lawful directive from the CEO or the Board of Directors.
“Good Reason” is defined in the Change in Control Plan to include:
a material diminution in the participant’s base salary or in his/her duties or authority;
the FHLB requiring the participant to be based at any office or location more than 100 miles from Cincinnati, Ohio; or
a material breach of the Change in Control Plan by the FHLB.
a material diminution in the participant’s base salary or in his/her duties or authority;
the FHLB requiring the participant to be based at any office or location more than 100 miles from Cincinnati, Ohio; or
a material breach of the Change in Control Plan by the FHLB.
In the event of a qualifying termination, the participant will receive a severance payment equal to a compensation multiplier times the sum of the participant's base salary plus target annual incentive amount for the year in which the Change in Control occurs. The CEO (Tier 1) is subject to a compensation multiplier of 2.50, Executive Vice Presidents (Tier 2) are subject to a compensation multiplier of 1.75 and Senior Vice Presidents (Tier 3) are subject to a compensation multiplier of 1.50. Participants will also receive a lump sum cash payment equal to accrued vacation benefits and the amount that would have been payable pursuant to the participant’s annual incentive compensation award for the year in which the date of a qualifying termination occurs based on actual performance, prorated based on the number of days the participant was employed that year. In addition, participants will receive a cash payment for outplacement assistance of $7,500 for Tier 1, $4,500 for Tier 2 and $2,500 for Tier 3, as well as the continuation of health care coverage for 24 months for Tier 1, 18 months for Tier 2 and 12 months for Tier 3.
The following table presents the total amounts that would be payable to our Named Executive Officers if their employment had terminated as of December 31, 2019.2020.

Total Potential Payment Upon Termination (1)
Separation EventAndrew S.
Howell
Stephen J. SponaugleR. Kyle
Lawler
Roger B.
Batsel
Tami L.
Hendrickson
Involuntary termination for Cause$— $— $— $— $— 
Voluntary resignation not due to a Change in Control or resignation without Good Reason due to a Change in Control (2)
83,077 42,200 55,592 11,128 36,346 
Involuntary termination without Cause not due to a Change in Control (3)
533,077 253,200 274,592 195,128 193,846 
Involuntary termination without Cause due to a Change in Control or resignation for Good Reason due to a Change in Control (4)
4,724,479 1,497,552 1,565,344 1,291,502 929,903 
(1)Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amounts of compensation and benefits provided upon the potential termination events, the actual amounts paid may be different than the estimates presented.
(2)Named Executive Officers would only receive payment for unused, accrued vacation.
(3)Named Executive Officers would receive payment for one month's pay for each year of continuous employment, rounded to the next whole year for partial years, subject to a six months' pay maximum, plus unused, accrued vacation.
(4)Named Executive Officers would receive payment as follows:
ComponentAndrew S. HowellStephen J. SponaugleR. Kyle
Lawler
Roger B.
Batsel
Tami L.
Hendrickson
Salary$2,250,000 $738,500 $766,500 $644,000 $472,500 
Incentive compensation1,687,500 443,100 459,900 386,400 248,062 
Other (a)
786,979 315,952 338,944 261,102 209,341 
Total$4,724,479 $1,497,552 $1,565,344 $1,291,502 $929,903 
(a)Includes accrued annual incentive compensation from the current year, accrued vacation benefits, outplacement assistance and health care coverage.

158
Separation Event 
Andrew S.
Howell
 Stephen J. Sponaugle 
R. Kyle
Lawler
 J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. 
Roger B.
Batsel
Involuntary termination for Cause $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Voluntary resignation not due to a Change in Control or resignation without Good Reason due to a Change in Control (2)
 80,769
 36,225
 45,769
 16,638
 3,758
Involuntary termination without Cause not due to a Change in Control (3)
 518,269
 240,975
 258,269
 171,138
 174,258
Involuntary termination without Cause due to a Change in Control or resignation for Good Reason due to a Change in Control (4)
 4,594,238
 1,449,221
 1,511,465
 1,087,934
 982,058
(1)Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amounts of compensation and benefits provided upon the potential termination events, the actual amounts paid may be different than the estimates presented.
(2)Named Executive Officers would only receive payment for unused, accrued vacation.
(3)Named Executive Officers would receive payment for one month's pay for each year of continuous employment, rounded to the next whole year for partial years, subject to a six months' pay maximum, plus unused, accrued vacation.
(4)Named Executive Officers would receive payment as follows:

Table of Contents
Component Andrew S. Howell Stephen J. Sponaugle 
R. Kyle
Lawler
 J. Gregory Dooley, Sr. 
Roger B.
Batsel
Salary $2,187,500
 $716,625
 $743,750
 $540,750
 $511,500
Incentive compensation 1,640,625
 429,975
 446,250
 324,450
 268,538
Other (a)
 766,113
 302,621
 321,465
 222,734
 202,020
Total $4,594,238
 $1,449,221
 $1,511,465
 $1,087,934
 $982,058
(a)Includes accrued annual incentive compensation from the current year, accrued vacation benefits, outplacement assistance and health care coverage.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
 
The Committee has furnished the following report for inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the 20192020 Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with the FHLB's management. Based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Donald J. Mullineaux (Chair)
Grady P. Appleton
Leslie D. Dunn
James A. England
Robert T. Lameier
Nancy E. Uridil


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
 
As required by Finance Agency regulations and the FHLBank Act, we have established a formal policy governing the compensation and travel reimbursement provided to our directors. The goal of the policy is to compensate Board members for work performed. Under our policy, compensation is comprised of per meeting fees, subject to an annual cap, and reimbursement for reasonable travel-related expenses. The fees are intended to compensate directors for time spent reviewing materials sent to them, preparing for meetings, participating in other activities and attending the meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

The annual maximum base fee did not change from 20192020 to 2020.2021. The following table sets forth the maximum base fees for 20192020 and 2020:2021:
20202021
Maximum Base FeesMaximum Base Fees
Chair$145,000 $145,000 
Vice Chair125,500 125,500 
Other members110,000 110,000 
 2019 2020
 Maximum Base Fees Maximum Base Fees
Chair$145,000
 $145,000
Vice Chair125,500
 125,500
Other members110,000
 110,000

In addition to the base fees, annual fees are paid to the Audit Committee Chair and Other Committee Chairs of $15,500 and $12,500, respectively. These fees are subject to certain attendance requirements.

During 2019,2020, total directors' fees and travel expenses incurred were $2,064,575$2,096,000 and $284,690,$18,259, respectively. For 2020, travel expenses were significantly lower than prior years given the travel restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and decision to hold most board meetings virtually.
 
With prior approval, our Travel Policy permits a guest to accompany a director on authorized business trips. We reimburse the transportation and other related expenses associated with the guest's travel, subject to certain limitations, which are reported as a taxable fringe benefit. During 2019,Given our shift to virtual meetings due to COVID-19, there were 13 directorswas only one director that received reimbursement for guest travel expenses.expenses in 2020. These expenses did not exceed $10,000 for any director and, therefore, are excluded from the Directors Compensation Table below.
 

159

Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the fees earned by each director for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020.
 
20192020 Directors Compensation Table
Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
J. Lynn Anderson $125,500
Grady P. Appleton 110,000
April Miller Boise 110,000
Brady T. Burt 110,000
Greg W. Caudill 110,000
Mark N. DuHamel (1)
 78,575
Leslie D. Dunn 122,500
James A. England, Vice Chair 125,500
Robert T. Lameier 110,000
Michael R. Melvin 110,000
Donald J. Mullineaux, Chair 145,000
Alvin J. Nance 110,000
Michael P. Pell 110,000
Charles J. Ruma 122,500
David E. Sartore 122,500
William S. Stuard, Jr. 122,500
Nancy E. Uridil 110,000
James J. Vance 110,000
Total $2,064,575
(1)NameMr. DuHamel resigned as a Member Director effective July 22, 2019.Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
J. Lynn Anderson$125,500 
Grady P. Appleton110,000 
April Miller Boise110,000 
Brady T. Burt110,000 
Greg W. Caudill110,000 
Leslie D. Dunn110,000 
James A. England, Vice Chair125,500 
Robert T. Lameier110,000 
Donald J. Mullineaux, Chair145,000 
Alvin J. Nance110,000 
Michael P. Pell110,000 
Kathleen A. Rogers110,000 
Charles J. Ruma122,500 
David E. Sartore122,500 
William S. Stuard, Jr.122,500 
Nancy E. Uridil122,500 
James J. Vance110,000 
Jonathan D. Welty110,000 
Total$2,096,000 

The following table summarizes the total number of board meetings and meetings of its designated committees held in 20182019 and 2019.2020.
 Number of Meetings Held
Meeting Type20192020
Board Meeting99
Audit Committee1011
Risk Committee86
Business and Operations Committee55
Governance66
Housing and Community Development Committee34
Human Resources, Compensation and Inclusion Committee76


160

  Number of Meetings Held
Meeting Type 2018 2019
Board Meeting 10 9
Audit Committee 11 10
Risk Committee 7 8
Business and Operations Committee 5 5
Governance 7 6
Housing and Community Development Committee 6 3
Human Resources, Compensation and Inclusion Committee 6 7
Table of Contents



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
 
The Committee is charged with responsibility for the FHLB's compensation policies and programs. None of the 20192020 or 20202021 Committee members are or previously were officers or employees of the FHLB. Additionally, none of the FHLB's executive officers served or serve on the board of directors or the compensation committee of any entity whose executive officers served on the Committee or Board of Directors. This Committee was and is composed of the following members:
20202021
Donald J. Mullineaux (Chair)Donald J. Mullineaux (Chair)
Grady P. AppletonGrady P. Appleton
Leslie D. DunnJames A. England
James A. EnglandRobert T. Lameier
Robert T. LameierNancy E. Uridil
Nancy E. Uridil
2019 2020
Donald J. Mullineaux (Chair) Donald J. Mullineaux (Chair)
Grady P. Appleton Grady P. Appleton
Leslie D. Dunn Leslie D. Dunn
James A. England James A. England
Michael R. Melvin Robert T. Lameier
Nancy E. Uridil Nancy E. Uridil



PAY RATIO

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, information about the 20192020 total compensation for our median employee and the President and CEO, Mr. Howell, is as follows:

the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than the CEO) was $127,256; and
the annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $5,213,357
the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than the CEO) was $127,947; and
the annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $4,993,790.

.

Based on this information, for 2019,2020, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 4139 to 1.

The median employee was identified in 2017. To identify the median employee, we compared the compensation of all full-time and part-time employees who were employed as of November 3, 2017.December 15, 2020. We annualized the compensation of employees who were hired in 20172020 but did not work for us the entire fiscal year. This compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all employees, included base salary, overtime pay and incentive compensation that was all payable in cash.
We have updatedAfter we identified our median employee, we combined all of the medianelements of such employee's compensation for 2019,in 2020, which includes base salary, excess accrued vacation benefits, incentive compensation, matching contributions to the qualified defined contribution pension plan, and the value of such employee’s pension benefits. The value of the median employee's pension benefits represents only the change in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits, which is primarily dependent on changes in interest rates, years of benefit service and salary. With respect to the annual total compensation of the CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 20192020 Summary Compensation Table.


Item 12.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

.

We have one class of capital stock, Class B Stock, all of which is owned by our current and former member institutions. Individuals, including directors and officers of the FHLB, are not permitted to own our capital stock. Therefore, we have no equity compensation plans.

The following table lists institutions holding five percent or more of outstanding capital stock at February 29, 202028, 2021 and includes any known affiliates that are members of the FHLB:
(Dollars in thousands)    
  CapitalPercent of TotalNumber
NameAddressStockCapital Stockof Shares
U.S. Bank, N.A.425 Walnut Street Cincinnati, OH 45202$227,143 %2,271,432 
Third Federal Savings & Loan Association7007 Broadway Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105162,783 1,627,826 
161

(Dollars in thousands)    
  CapitalPercent of TotalNumber
NameAddressStockCapital Stockof Shares
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.1111 Polaris Parkway
Columbus, OH 43240
$583,490
18%5,834,898
U.S. Bank, N.A.425 Walnut Street Cincinnati, OH 45202454,581
14
4,545,811
Table of Contents

The following table lists capital stock outstanding as of February 29, 202028, 2021 held by member institutions that have an officer or director who serves as a director of the FHLB:     
(Dollars in thousands)   
  CapitalPercent of Total
NameAddressStockCapital Stock
U.S. Bank, N.A.425 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
$227,143 9.2 %
Western & Southern Financial Group (1)
400 Broadway Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
178,743 7.2 
The Park National Bank50 North Third Street
Newark, OH 43058
17,807 0.7 
F&M Bank50 Franklin Street
Clarksville, TN 37040
4,998 0.2 
Farmers National Bank304 West Main Street
Danville, KY 40422
2,274 0.1 
Field & Main Bank140 North Main Street
Henderson, KY 42420
2,258 0.1 
First State Bank19230 State Route 136
Winchester, OH 45697
1,617 0.1 
Miami Savings Bank8008 Ferry Street
Miamitown, OH 45041
876 0.0 
Decatur County Bank56 North Pleasant Street
Decaturville, TN 38329
646 0.0 
Ohio Capital Finance Corporation88 East Broad Street, Suite 1800
Columbus, OH 43215
155 0.0 
(1)    Includes five subsidiaries (Western-Southern Life Assurance Co., Integrity Life Insurance Company, Lafayette Life Insurance Company, Columbus Life Insurance Company and National Integrity Life Insurance Company), which are FHLB members.
(Dollars in thousands)   
  CapitalPercent of Total
NameAddressStockCapital Stock
U.S. Bank, N.A.425 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
$454,581
14.0%
Western & Southern Financial Group (1)
400 Broadway Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
132,076
4.1
The Park National Bank50 North Third Street
Newark, OH 43058
28,844
0.9
F&M Bank50 Franklin Street
Clarksville, TN 37040
4,998
0.2
Farmers National Bank304 West Main Street
Danville, KY 40422
2,274
0.1
Field & Main Bank140 North Main Street
Henderson, KY 42420
2,030
0.1
First State Bank19230 State Route 136
Winchester, OH 45697
1,281
0.0
Miami Savings Bank8008 Ferry Street
Miamitown, OH 45041
789
0.0
Decatur County Bank56 North Pleasant Street
Decaturville, TN 38329
646
0.0
Ohio Capital Finance Corporation88 East Broad Street, Suite 1800
Columbus, OH 43215
155
0.0
(1)Includes five subsidiaries (Western-Southern Life Assurance Co., Integrity Life Insurance Company, Lafayette Life Insurance Company, Columbus Life Insurance Company and National Integrity Life Insurance Company), which are FHLB members.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Because we are a cooperative, capital stock ownership is a prerequisite to transacting any business with us. Transactions with our stockholders are part of the ordinary course of - and are essential to the purpose of - our business.

Our capital stock is not permitted to be publicly traded and is not listed on any stock exchange. Therefore, we are not governed by stock exchange rules relating to director independence. If we were so governed, arguably none of our industry directors, who

are elected by our members, would be deemed independent because all are directors and/or officers of members that do business with us. Messrs. Appleton, Mullineaux Nance and Ruma and Mses. Anderson, Boise, DunnDarby and Uridil, our eightseven non-industry directors, have no material transactions, relationships or arrangements with the FHLB other than in their capacity as directors. Therefore, our Board of Directors has determined that each of them is independent under the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

The Finance Agency director independence standards specify independence criteria for members of our Audit Committee. Under these criteria, all of our directors serving on the Audit Committee are independent.


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

See Note 2218 of the Notes to Financial Statements for information on transactions with stockholders, including information on transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions and concentrations of business, and transactions with nonmember affiliates, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

See also “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in Item 11. Executive Compensation.

162

Review and Approval of Related Persons Transactions. Ordinary course transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions and with members holding five percent or more of our capital stock are reviewed and approved by our management in the normal course of events so as to assure compliance with Finance Agency regulations.

As required by Finance Agency regulations, we have a written conflict of interest policy. This policy requires directors (1) to disclose to the Board of Directors any known personal financial interests that they, their immediate family members or their business associates have in any matter to be considered by the Board and in any other matter in which another person or entity does or proposes to do business with the FHLB and (2) to recuse themselves from considering or voting on any such matter. The scope of the Finance Agency's conflict of interest regulation (available at www.fhfa.gov) and our conflict of interest policy (posted on our website at www.fhlbcin.com) is similar, although not identical, to the scope of the SEC's requirements governing transactions with related persons. In 2007, our Board of Directors adopted a written related person transaction policy that is intended to close any gaps between Finance Agency and SEC requirements. The policy includes procedures for identifying, approving and reporting related person transactions as defined by the SEC. One of the tools that we used to monitor non-ordinary course transactions and other relationships with our directors and executive officers is an annual questionnaire that uses the New York Stock Exchange criteria for independence. Finally, our Insider Trading Policy provides that any request for redemption of excess stock (except for de minimis amounts) held by a Director's Financial Institution must be approved by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee of the Board.

We believe these policies are effective in bringing to the attention of management and the Board any non-ordinary course transactions that require Board review and approval and that all such transactions since January 1, 20192020 have been so reviewed and approved.



Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the FHLB for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 by its independent registered public accounting firm, PwC:
 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)December 31,
 2019 2018
Audit fees$733
 $721
Audit-related fees89
 70
Tax fees
 
All other fees2
 3
Total fees$824
 $794

 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)December 31,
 20202019
Audit fees$745 $733 
Audit-related fees98 89 
Tax fees— — 
All other fees
Total fees$845 $824 
Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of the FHLB's financial statements.

Audit-related fees were for assurance and services related to the performance of the audit and review of the FHLB's financial statements and primarily consisted of accounting consultations and fees related to participation in and presentations at conferences.

The FHLB is exempt from all federal, state and local income taxation. Therefore, no fees were paid for tax services during the years presented.

All other fees were for the annual license of accounting research software and a disclosure compliance checklist.

The Audit Committee approves the annual engagement letter for the FHLB's audit. In evaluating the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers a number of factors, such as:
PwC's independence and process for maintaining independence;
PwC's historical and recent performance on the FHLB's audit, including the results of an internal survey of PwC service and quality with the FHLB and the FHLBank System;
external data related to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audit quality inspection reports on PwC; and
the appropriateness of PwC's audit fees.

PwC's independence and process for maintaining independence;
PwC's historical and recent performance on the FHLB's audit, including the results of an internal survey of PwC service and quality with the FHLB and the FHLBank System;
external data related to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audit quality inspection reports on PwC; and
the appropriateness of PwC's audit fees.
163

The Audit Committee also establishes a fixed dollar limit for other recurring annual accounting related consultations, which include the FHLB's share of FHLBank System-related accounting issues. The status of these services is periodically reviewed by the Audit Committee throughout the year with any increase in these services requiring pre-approval. All other services provided by the independent accounting firm are specifically approved by the Audit Committee in advance of commitment.

The FHLB paid additional fees to PwC in the form of assessments paid to the Office of Finance. The FHLB is assessed its proportionate share of the costs of operating the Office of Finance, which includes the expenses associated with the annual audits of the combined financial statements of the FHLBanks. These assessments, which totaled $49,000 and $48,000 in 2020 and $49,000 in 2019, and 2018, respectively, are not included in the table above.


PART IV


Item 15.
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)Financial Statements. The following financial statements of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, set forth in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data above, are filed as a part of this registration statement.

.

(a)
Financial Statements. The following financial statements of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, set forth in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data above, are filed as a part of this registration statement.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20192020 and 20182019
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018
Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018
Notes to Financial Statements

(b)Exhibits.
(b)
Exhibits.
164


10.1010.11Form 8-K, filed
July 30, 2009
10.1110.12Form 10-K, filed March 16, 2017
10.1210.13Form 10-K, filed March 21, 2019
10.1310.14Form 10-Q, filed November 9, 2017
24
24Filed Herewith
31.1Filed Herewith
31.2Filed Herewith
32Furnished Herewith
99.1
99.1Furnished Herewith
99.2Furnished Herewith
101.INSXBRL Instance DocumentThe instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentFiled Herewith
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentFiled Herewith
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentFiled Herewith
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentFiled Herewith
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentFiled Herewith
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)Filed Herewith
(1)Numbers coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
(2)Indicates management compensation plan or arrangement.

(1)Numbers coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
(2)Indicates management compensation plan or arrangement.
165


Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.

Item 16.    Form 10-K Summary.

None.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of the 19th18th day of March 2020.2021.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Andrew S. Howell
Andrew S. Howell
President and Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ Andrew S. Howell
Andrew S. Howell
President and Chief Executive Officer

SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, hereby appoint Andrew S. Howell and Stephen J. Sponaugle, or either of them, our true and lawful attorneys and agents to do any and all acts and things in our names and on our behalves, in our capacities indicated below, which said attorneys and agents, or either of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable said registrant to comply with the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2020, including, without limitation, power and authority to sign for us, or any of us, in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Report and any and all amendments to the Report, and we hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents, or each of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of the 19th18th day of March 2020.2021.

SignaturesTitle
 /s/ Andrew S. HowellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew S. Howell(principal executive officer)
 /s/ Stephen J. SponaugleExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Stephen J. Sponaugle(principal financial officer)
 /s/ J. Christopher BatesSenior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
J. Christopher Bates(principal accounting officer)
 /s/ J. Lynn AndersonDirector (Chair)
J. Lynn Anderson, Chair
SignaturesTitle
 /s/ Andrew S. HowellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew S. Howell(principal executive officer)
 /s/ Stephen J. SponaugleExecutive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
Stephen J. Sponaugle(principal financial officer)
 /s/ J. Christopher BatesSenior Vice President-Chief Accounting Officer
J. Christopher Bates(principal accounting officer)
 /s/ J. Lynn AndersonDirector
J. Lynn Anderson
 /s/ Grady P. AppletonDirector
Grady P. Appleton
 /s/ April Miller BoiseDirector
April Miller Boise
 /s/ Brady T. BurtDirector
Brady T. Burt
 /s/ Greg W. CaudillDirector
Greg W. Caudill

 /s/ Leslie D. DunnBrady T. BurtDirector
Leslie D. DunnBrady T. Burt
166

SignaturesTitle
 /s/ Greg W. CaudillDirector
Greg W. Caudill
/s/ Kristin H. DarbyDirector
Kristin H. Darby
/s/ James A. EnglandDirector (Vice Chair)
James A. England
 /s//s/ Robert T. LameierDirector
Robert T. Lameier
 /s//s/ Donald J. MullineauxDirector (Chair)
Donald J. Mullineaux
 /s/ Alvin J. NanceDirector
Alvin J. Nance
 /s//s/ Michael P. PellDirector
Michael P. Pell
 /s//s/ Kathleen A. RogersDirector
Kathleen A. Rogers
 /s//s/ Charles J. RumaDirector
Charles J. Ruma
 /s//s/ David E. SartoreDirector
David E. Sartore
 /s//s/ William S. Stuard, Jr.Director
William S. Stuard, Jr.
 /s//s/ Nancy E. UridilDirector
Nancy E. Uridil
 /s//s/ James J. VanceDirector
James J. Vance
 /s//s/ Jonathan D. WeltyDirector
Jonathan D. Welty




164
167