UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202022
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-51845
____________________________________
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | | | | | | |
| Federally chartered corporation | | 56-6000442 |
| United States | | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1475 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, GA
(Address of principal executive offices)
30309
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 888-8000
_____________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| None | N/A | N/A |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Stock, par value $100
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days. x Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). x Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| | | | |
| Non-accelerated filer | x | | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
| | | | |
| | | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
SecuritiesIf securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | |
Title of each classAct, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.��☐ | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
None | N/A | N/A |
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
Registrant’s stock is not publicly traded and is only issued to members of the registrant. Such stock is issued and redeemed at par value, $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. As of June 30, 2020,2022, the aggregate par value of the stock held by current and former members of the registrant was $3,681,537,900.$3,442,243,700. As of February 28, 2021, 30,451,4992023, 56,846,339 total shares were outstanding, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock.stock.
Table of Contents
| | | | | | | | |
| PART I. | |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| PART II. | |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9 | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| Item 9C. | | |
| PART III. | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| PART IV. | |
| Item 15. | | |
| Item 16. | | |
| | |
| |
Important Notice About Information in this Annual Report
In this annual report on Form 10-K (Report), unless the context suggests otherwise, references to the “Bank” mean the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. “FHLBanks” means the 11 district Federal Home Loan Banks, including the Bank, and “FHLBank System” means the FHLBanks and the Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance (Office of Finance), as regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency). “FHLBank Act” means the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended.
The information contained in this Report is accurate only as of the date of this Report and as of the dates specified herein.
The product and service names used in this Report are the property of the Bank and, in some cases, the other FHLBanks. Where the context suggests otherwise, the products, services, and company names mentioned in this Report are the property of their respective owners.
Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This Report includes statements describing anticipated developments, projections, estimates, or future predictions of the Bank that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same regulations. These statements may use forward-looking terminology such as, but not limited to, “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “may,” “could,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “should,” “will,” ”likely,” or their negatives or other variations on these terms. The Bank cautions that, by their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks or uncertainties, including the risk factors set forth in Item 1A—Risk Factors and the risks set forth below. Accordingly, the Bank cautions that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements or could impact the extent to which a particular objective, projection, estimate, or prediction is realized. As a result, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Bank does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement herein or that may be made from time to time on its behalf.
Forward-looking statements in this report may include, among others, the Bank’s expectations for:
•the Bank’s business strategy and changes in operations, including, without limitation, product growth and change in product mix;
•future performance, including profitability, dividends, retained earnings, developments, or market forecasts;
•repurchases of stock in excess of a stockholder’s total stock investment requirement (excess stock);
•credit losses on advances and investments in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (MBS);
•balance sheet changes and components thereof, such as changes in advances balances and the size of the Bank’s portfolio of investments in mortgage assets;
•the Bank’s minimum retained earnings target;
•the interest rate environment in which the Bank does business;
•forward-looking accounting and financial statement effects; and
•those other factors identified and discussed in the Bank’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Actual results may differ from forward-looking statements for many reasons including, but not limited to:
•future economic and market conditions, including, for example, inflation and deflation, the timing and volume of market activity; general consumer confidence and spending habits; the strength of local economies in which the Bank or its members conducts its business; housing prices, employment rates, and interest-rate changes that affect the housing markets;
•changes in the demand for the Bank’s advances and other products and services resulting from changes in members’ deposit flows and credit demands, as well as from changes in other sources of funding and liquidity available to members;
•changes in the financial health of the Bank’s members;
•volatility of market prices, rates, and indices that could affect the value of collateral held by the Bank as security for the obligations of Bank members and counterparties to derivatives and similar agreements;
•the risk of changes in market interest rates and in interest-rate on the Bank’s interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities;
•uncertainties related to the phase-out of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest-rate benchmark;
•changes in various governmental monetary or fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and related industry practices and standards, or the application thereof;
•changes in the credit ratings of the U.S. government and/or the FHLBanks;
•political, national, and world events, including acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters, global pandemics or other catastrophic events, and legislative, regulatory, judicial, or other developments that affect the economy, the Bank’s market area, the Bank, its members, counterparties, its federal regulators, and/or investors in the consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks;
•competitive forces, including other sources of funding available to Bank members, and other entities borrowing funds in the capital markets;
•the ability to attract and retain skilled individuals, including qualified executive officers;
•the Bank’s ability to develop, implement, promote the efficient performance of, and support and safeguard, technology and information systems, including those provided by third-parties, sufficient to measure and effectively manage the risks of the Bank’s business without significant interruption;
•changes in investor demand for consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks and/or the terms of derivatives and similar agreements, including changes in investor preference and demand for certain terms of these instruments, which may be less attractive to the Bank, or which the Bank may be unable to offer;
•the Bank’s ability to introduce, support, and manage the growth of new products and services and to successfully manage the risks associated with those products and services;
•the Bank’s ability to successfully manage the credit and other risks associated with any new types of collateral securing advances;
•the availability from acceptable counterparties, upon acceptable terms, of swaps, options, and other derivative financial instruments of the types and in the quantities needed for investment funding and risk-management purposes;
•the uncertainty and costs of litigation, including litigation filed against one or more of the FHLBanks;
•membership changes, including changes resulting from mergers or changes in the principal place of business of Bank members, which could result in decreased advances or other business from such members;
•changes in the FHLBank Act or Finance Agency regulations that affect FHLBank operations and regulatory oversight or changes in other statutes or regulations applicable to the FHLBanks; and
•adverse developments or events affecting or involving one or more other FHLBanks or the FHLBank System in general.
These risk factors are not exhaustive. New risk factors may emerge from time to time. The Bank cannot predict such new risk factors nor can it assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by any forward-looking statements.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Overview
General. The Bank is a federally chartered corporation that was organized in 1932 and is one of 11 district FHLBanks. The FHLBanks, along with the Office of Finance, comprise the FHLBank System. The FHLBanks are U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) organized under the authority of the FHLBank Act. Each FHLBank operates as a separate entity within a defined geographic district and has its own management, employees, and board of directors. The Bank’s defined geographic district includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. The Bank is supervised and regulated by the Finance Agency, an independent federal agency in the executive branch of the United StatesU.S. government.
Cooperative. The Bank is a cooperative owned by member institutions that are required to meet certain eligibility criteria and purchase capital stock in the Bank as a condition of membership. Federally insured depository institutions, insurance companies, privately insured state-chartered credit unions, and community development financial institutions (CDFIs) with principal place of business located in the Bank’s defined geographic district and engaged in residential housing finance arecan be eligible to apply for membership. The Bank’s capital stock is not publicly traded and is owned entirely by current or former members and certain non-members that own the Bank’s capital stock as a result of a merger with or acquisition of a Bank member. The Bank’s membership totaled 824797 financial institutions, comprised of 456433 commercial banks, 236240 credit unions, 6352 savings institutions, 5659 insurance companies, and 13 CDFIs as of December 31, 2020.2022.
Business Model. As a cooperative, the Bank’s customers are also its owners. The Bank strategically focuses on positioning itself with its membership in a number of ways to enhance their total value in the cooperative by providing readily available, competitively priced funding to its member institutions, a potential return on investments, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services, including education opportunities on a range of topics.topics to its member institutions. The Bank serves the public by providing its member institutions with a source of liquidity, thereby enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community developments. The Bank primarily supports this mission by offering collateralized loans, known as advances, to its members.
The Bank’s primary source of funds is proceeds from the sale of FHLBank debt instruments to the public. These debt instruments, known as “consolidated obligations,” are the joint and several obligations of all the FHLBanks. Because of the FHLBanks’ GSE status, the FHLBanks are generally able to raise funds at favorable rates. The Bank’s cooperative ownership structure allows the Bank to pass along the benefit of these low funding rates to its members. The U.S. government does not guarantee the debt securities or other obligations of the Bank or the FHLBank System.
Business. The Bank manages its operations as one business segment. Management and the Bank’s board of directors review enterprise-wide financial information in order to make operating decisions and assess performance.
In 2015,Based on the applicable regulation, the mission of the Bank is to provide to their members and housing associates financial products and services, including but not limited to advances, that assist and enhance such members' and housing associates' financing of: (1) housing, including single-family and multi-family housing serving consumers at all income levels; and (2) community lending. As part of their mission, the FHLBanks serve as a reliable source of liquidity to their members throughout the economic cycle. The Finance Agency issued an Advisory Bulletin providing further guidance on FHLBank core mission achievement. The Advisory Bulletin provides that when developing its strategic business plan with respect to core mission, FHLBanks should consider the guidelines established in the Advisory Bulletin. Pursuant to the Advisory Bulletin, the Finance Agency will assess each FHLBank’s core mission achievement by evaluating its core mission asset ratio, calculated as the ratio of primary mission assets, which include advances and acquired member assets, to consolidated obligations. This ratio is calculated annually at year-end, using annual average par values. Based on this ratio, the Finance Agency has provided the following expectations and framework for each FHLBank’s strategic plan:
•when the ratio is at least 70 percent or higher, the strategic plan should include an assessment of the FHLBank’s prospects for maintaining this level;
•when the ratio is at least 55 percent but less than 70 percent, the strategic plan should explain the FHLBank’s plan to bring the ratio closer to the preferred ratio; and
•when the ratio is below 55 percent, the strategic plan should include an explanation of the circumstances that caused the ratio to be at that level and detailed plans to increase the ratio. If the FHLBank maintains a ratio below 55 percent over the course of several consecutive reviews, then the board of directors should consider possible strategic alternatives.
The Bank’s core mission activities primarily include the issuance of advances. The Bank’s core mission asset ratio was 65.872.2 percent and 70.963.3 percent as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
The decreaseBank’s mission activities also include the Bank’s Affordable Housing Program (AHP) which provides low to no cost funding to finance rental and for-sale housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Each FHLBank must set aside 10 percent of its income subject to assessment for AHP, or such additional prorated sums as may be required so that the aggregate annual contribution of the FHLBanks is not less than $100 million. The AHP program will be discussed in advances and compliance with regulatory liquidity guidance, which required the Bank to hold an additional amount of liquid assets, impacted this ratiomore detail in 2020. The Bank has developed a plan to bring its core mission asset ratio closer to the preferred ratio.Item 1. Business—Community Investment Services.
Under the FHLBank Act, the Bank is exempt from ordinary federal, state, and local taxation, except employment and real property taxes. It does not have any subsidiaries nor does it sponsor any off-balance sheet special purpose entities.
Products and Services
The Bank’s products and services include the following:
•Credit Products;
•Community Investment Services; and
•Cash Management and Other Services.
Credit Products
The credit products that the Bank offers to its members include advances and standby letters of credit.
Advances
Advances are the Bank’s primary product. Advances are fully secured loans made to members and eligible housing finance agencies, authorities, and organizations called “housing associates” (non-members that are approved mortgagees under Title II of the National Housing Act). The carrying value of the Bank’s outstanding advances was $52.2$109.6 billion and $97.2$45.4 billion as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, and advances represented 56.572.3 percent and 64.857.7 percent of total assets as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. Advances generated 68.169.6 percent, 65.568.3 percent, and 67.068.1 percent of total interest income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.
Advances serve as a funding source for the Bank’s members for a variety of conforming and nonconforming mortgages. Thus, advances support important housing markets, including those focused on low- and moderate-income households. For those members that choose to sell or securitize their mortgages, advances can supply interim funding.
Generally, member institutions use the Bank’s advances for one or more of the following purposes:
•providing funding for mortgages held in the member’s portfolio, including both conforming and nonconforming mortgages;
•providing temporary funding during the origination, packaging, and sale of mortgages into the secondary market;
•providing funding for commercial real estate loans;
•assisting with asset-liability management by matching the maturity and prepayment characteristics of mortgage loans or adjusting the sensitivity of the member’s balance sheet to interest-rate changes;
•providing a cost-effective alternative to meet contingent liquidity needs and adhere to liquidity management strategies; and
•providing funding for community investment and economic development.
Pursuant to statutory and regulatory requirements, the Bank may only make long-term advances to community financial institutions for the purpose of enabling a member to purchase or fund new or existing residential housing finance assets, which may include defined small business loans, small farm loans, small agri-businessagribusiness loans, and community development loans.loans, as defined by the applicable regulation. The Bank’s management indirectly monitors the purpose for which members use advances through limitations on eligible collateral as described below.
The Bank obtains a security interest in eligible collateral to secure a member’s advance prior to the time that the Bank originates or renews an advance. Eligible collateral is defined by the FHLBank Act, Finance Agency regulations, and the Bank’s credit and collateral policy. The Bank requires its borrowers to execute an advances and security agreement that establishes the Bank’s security interest in all collateral pledged by the borrower.borrower, thereby obtaining a security interest in eligible collateral to secure an advance prior to the time that the Bank originates or renews an advance. The Bank also perfects its security interest in collateral prior to making an advance to the borrower. As additional security for a member’s indebtedness, the Bank has a statutory and contractual lien on the member’s capital stock in the Bank. The Bank may also require additional or substitute collateral from a borrower, as provided in the FHLBank Act and the financing documents between the Bank and its borrowers.
The Bank’s management assesses member creditworthiness and financial condition, typically on a quarterly basis, to determine the term and maximum dollar amount of advances that the Bank will lend to a particular member. In addition, the Bank discounts eligible collateral and periodically revalues the collateral pledged by each member to secure its outstanding advances. The Bank has never experienced a credit loss on an advance.
The FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the Bank by any member of the Bank, or any affiliate of any such member, priority over the claims and rights of any party (including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar party having rights of a lien creditor), other than the claims and rights of a party that (1) would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law; and (2) is an actual bona fide purchaser for value or is an actual secured party whose security interest is perfected in accordance with applicable state law. Pursuant to its regulations, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has recognized the priority of an FHLBank’s security interest under the FHLBank Act and the right of an FHLBank to require delivery of collateral held by the FDIC, as receiver, for a failed depository institution. Most members provide the Bank with a blanket lien covering substantially all of the member’s real estate-related assets and their consent for the Bank to file a financing statement evidencing the blanket lien. Based on the blanket lien, the financing statementThe Bank requires delivery of cash and the statutory preferences,securities pledged to the Bank normally does not take controlas collateral. Delivery of loan collateral other than securities collateral,is also required when pledged by blanket lien borrowers. With respect to non-blanket lien borrowers (typically insurance companies, CDFIs, and housing associates),associates. For most bank and given the interaction with certain state insurance laws with the FHLBank Act, the Bank takescredit union members, delivery of all of those members’ pledged collateral.loan collateral is not required.
The Bank offers standard and customized advances to fit a variety of member needs. Generally, the Bank offers maturities as described below, but longer maturities are available, which are subject to a member’s financial condition and available funding. The Bank’s advances include, among other products, the following:
Adjustable- or variable-rate indexed advances. Adjustable- or variable-rate indexed advances include the following:
•Daily Rate Credit Advance (DRC Advance). The DRC Advance provides short-term funding with rate resets on a daily basis, similar to federal funds lines. The DRC Advance is available generally from one day to 12 months.
•Adjustable Rate Credit Advance (ARC Advance). The ARC Advance is an advance that floats to an index and provides intermediate and long-term funding with rate resets at specified intervals. The ARC Advance is available for a term generally of up to 10 years.
•Floating-to-Fixed Advance. This is an advance that floats to an index and changes to a predetermined fixed rate on a predetermined date prior to maturity. The Bank offers this product with a maturity generally of up to 15 years.
•Callable SOFR Floater. This is an advance that provides intermediate funding at a variable rate, tied to Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) with the option to repay the advance on specified dates with no prepayment fee. The call option may be Bermudan (quarterly) or European (one-time). The interest rate resets at periodic intervals, so pricing adjusts automatically to changing market conditions. Members can choose the advance term and rate reset period.
Fixed-rate advances. Fixed-rate advances include the following:
•Fixed Rate Credit Advance (FRC Advance). The FRC Advance offers fixed-rate funds with principal due at maturity generally from one month to 20 years. The Bank allows for the inclusion of interest-rate caps and/or floors in certain FRC Advances with terms of 12 months or greater and a par value of $1 million or more.
•Callable Advance. The callable advance is a fixed-rate advance with a fixed maturity and the option for the borrower to prepay the advance on an option exercise date(s) before maturity without a fee. The options can be Bermudan (periodically during the life of the advance) or European (one-time).European. The Bank offers this product with a maturity generally of up to 10 years with options generally from three months to 10 years.
•Expander Advance. The expander advance is a fixed-rate advance with a fixed maturity and an option by the borrower to increase the amount of the advance on a predetermined future date at a predetermined interest rate. The option may only be European. The Bank has established internal limits on the amount of such options that may be sold based upon which quarter they will mature. The Bank offers this product with a maturity generally of two years to 20 years with an option exercise date that can be set generally from one month to 10 years.
•Principal Reducing Credit Advance (PRC Advance). The PRC Advance is a fixed-rate advance with a final maturity generally of up to 20 years and predetermined principal reductions on specific dates. The reduction schedule is predetermined by the borrower and may be scheduled on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis. Amortization options include equal payments or structures similar to a mortgage.
Convertible advances. In a convertible advance, the Bank purchases an option from the borrower that allows the Bank to modify the interest rate on the advance from fixed to variable on certain specified dates. The Bank’s option can be Bermudan or European. The Bank offers this product with a maturity generally of up to 15 years with options generally from three months to 15 years.
Forward starting advances. With the forward starting advance, the borrower may enter into the terms of any structured advance, including the FRC Advance, ARC Advance, Expander Advance, or Floating-to-Fixed Advance, with a future settlement date. Interest accrues beginning on the settlement date. A termination fee applies if the borrower voluntarily terminates the advance prior to the settlement date.
The following table presents the par value of outstanding advances by product characteristics (dollars in millions). See Note 96—Advances to the Bank’s 20202022 audited financial statements for further information on the distinction between par value and carrying value of outstanding advances. | | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | Amount | | Percent of Total | | Amount | | Percent of Total | | Amount | | Percent of Total | | Amount | | Percent of Total |
| Adjustable or variable-rate indexed | | Adjustable or variable-rate indexed | $ | 60,144 | | | 54.52 | | | $ | 9,813 | | | 21.84 | |
Fixed rate (1) | Fixed rate (1) | $ | 33,816 | | | 66.77 | | | $ | 57,711 | | | 59.83 | | Fixed rate (1) | 48,533 | | | 44.00 | | | 29,288 | | | 65.19 | |
| Adjustable or variable-rate indexed | 10,678 | | | 21.09 | | | 33,412 | | | 34.64 | | |
| Convertible | Convertible | 5,316 | | | 10.50 | | | 4,261 | | | 4.42 | | Convertible | 1,266 | | | 1.15 | | | 5,307 | | | 11.81 | |
| Principal reducing credit | Principal reducing credit | 833 | | | 1.64 | | | 1,072 | | | 1.11 | | Principal reducing credit | 366 | | | 0.33 | | | 519 | | | 1.16 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 50,643 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 96,456 | | | 100.00 | | Total par value | $ | 110,309 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 44,927 | | | 100.00 | |
____________
(1) Includes convertible advances whose conversion options have expired.
The Bank establishes interest rates on advances using the Bank’s cost of funds on consolidated obligations and the interest-rate swap market. The Bank establishes an interest rate applicable to each type of advance each day and then adjusts those rates during the day to reflect changes in the cost of funds and interest rates.
The Bank includes prepayment fee provisions in most advance transactions. With respect to callable advances, prepayment fees apply to prepayments on dates other than option exercise dates. The Bank also offers variable-rate prepayable advances, in which prepayment fees apply to prepayments made on dates other than certain specified dates. As required by Finance Agency
regulations, the prepayment fee is intended to make the Bank financially indifferent to a borrower’s decision to prepay an advance before maturity or, with respect to a callable advance, on a date other than an option exercise date.
The following table presents information on the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers of advances (dollars in millions):
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| Institution | Institution | | State | | Advances
Par Value | | Percent of Total Advances | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) (1) | Institution | | State of Membership | | Advances
Par Value | | Percent of Total Advances | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) (1) |
| | Truist Bank | | Truist Bank | | North Carolina | | $ | 29,702 | | | 26.93 | | | 4.54 | |
| TIAA, FSB | TIAA, FSB | | Florida | | $ | 7,571 | | | 14.95 | | | 1.44 | | TIAA, FSB | | Florida | | 9,160 | | | 8.30 | | | 4.40 | |
| Bank of America, National Association | Bank of America, National Association | | North Carolina | | 7,507 | | | 14.83 | | | 0.28 | | Bank of America, National Association | | North Carolina | | 8,255 | | | 7.48 | | | 4.51 | |
| BankUnited, National Association | | BankUnited, National Association | | Florida | | 5,420 | | | 4.91 | | | 4.32 | |
| Navy Federal Credit Union | Navy Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 6,495 | | | 12.83 | | | 2.43 | | Navy Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 4,565 | | | 4.14 | | | 4.09 | |
| First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company | | First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company | | North Carolina | | 4,250 | | | 3.85 | | | 4.39 | |
| Brighthouse Life Insurance Company | | Brighthouse Life Insurance Company | | North Carolina | | 3,900 | | | 3.54 | | | 3.42 | |
| Synovus Bank | | Synovus Bank | | Georgia | | 3,875 | | | 3.51 | | | 4.62 | |
| Pentagon Federal Credit Union | Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 3,804 | | | 7.51 | | | 1.37 | | Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 3,823 | | | 3.47 | | | 4.56 | |
| Truist Bank | | North Carolina | | 3,455 | | | 6.82 | | | 1.45 | | |
| BankUnited, National Association | | Florida | | 3,121 | | | 6.16 | | | 0.46 | | |
| Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company | | Maryland | | 1,206 | | | 2.38 | | | 2.12 | | |
| City National Bank of Florida | City National Bank of Florida | | Florida | | 1,200 | | | 2.37 | | | 0.71 | | City National Bank of Florida | | Florida | | 2,525 | | | 2.29 | | | 4.30 | |
| Amerant Bank, National Association | | Florida | | 1,050 | | | 2.07 | | | 1.20 | | |
| Raymond James Bank, National Association | | Florida | | 850 | | | 1.68 | | | 0.38 | | |
| Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | | 36,259 | | | 71.60 | | | 1.25 | | Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | | 75,475 | | | 68.42 | | | 4.41 | |
| Subtotal (all other borrowers) | Subtotal (all other borrowers) | | 14,384 | | | 28.40 | | | 1.42 | | Subtotal (all other borrowers) | | 34,834 | | | 31.58 | | | 3.76 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | | $ | 50,643 | | | 100.00 | | | 1.30 | | Total par value | | $ | 110,309 | | | 100.00 | | | 4.20 | |
____________
(1) The average interest rate of the member’s advance portfolio weighted by each advance’s outstanding balance.
Standby Letters of Credit
The Bank issues irrevocable standby letters of credit on behalf of its members to support certain obligations of the members to third-party beneficiaries. Members may use standby letters of credit for residential housing financing and community lending or for liquidity and asset-liability management. In particular, members often use standby letters of credit as collateral for deposits from public sector entities. Standby letters of credit are generally available for nonrenewable terms of up to five years or for one-year terms that are renewable annually with a final expiration date of up to 10 years after issuance. The Bank requires members to fully collateralize the face amount of any standby letter of credit issued by the Bank during the term of the standby letter of credit. The Bank also charges members a fee based on the face amount of the standby letter of credit. If the Bank is required to make a payment for a beneficiary’s draw, the amount must be reimbursed by the member immediately or, subject to the Bank’s discretion, may be converted into an advance to the member. The Bank’s underwriting and collateral requirements for standby letters of credit are the same as they are for advances. Standby letters of credit are not currently subject to a specific activity-based capital stock purchase requirement.
The Bank has never experienced a credit loss related to a standby letter of credit reimbursement obligation. Unlike advances, standby letters of credit are accounted for as financial guarantees because a standby letter of credit may expire in accordance with its terms without being drawn upon by the beneficiary. The Bank had $16.0$9.0 billion and $32.5$7.7 billion of outstanding standby letters of credit as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
Advances and Standby Letters of Credit Combined
The following table presents information on the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers of advances and standby letters of credit combined (dollars in millions):
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| Institution | Institution | | State | | Advances Par Value and Standby Letters of Credit Balance | | Percent of Total Advances Par Value and Standby Letters of Credit | Institution | | State of Membership | | Advances Par Value and Standby Letters of Credit Balance | | Percent of Total Advances Par Value and Standby Letters of Credit |
| Truist Bank | | Truist Bank | | North Carolina | | $ | 29,702 | | | 24.89 | |
| TIAA, FSB | | TIAA, FSB | | Florida | | 9,160 | | | 7.67 | |
| Bank of America, National Association | Bank of America, National Association | | North Carolina | | $ | 10,615 | | | 15.92 | | Bank of America, National Association | | North Carolina | | 9,124 | | | 7.64 | |
| TIAA, FSB | | Florida | | 7,671 | | | 11.50 | | |
| BankUnited, National Association | | BankUnited, National Association | | Florida | | 6,020 | | | 5.04 | |
| First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company | | First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company | | North Carolina | | 5,700 | | | 4.78 | |
| Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 4,786 | | | 4.01 | |
| Navy Federal Credit Union | Navy Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 6,503 | | | 9.75 | | Navy Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 4,567 | | | 3.83 | |
| BBVA USA | | Alabama | | 6,499 | | | 9.75 | | |
| Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | Virginia | | 3,903 | | | 5.85 | | |
| Truist Bank | | North Carolina | | 3,482 | | | 5.22 | | |
| BankUnited, National Association | | Florida | | 3,121 | | | 4.68 | | |
| Synovus Bank | | Synovus Bank | | Georgia | | 3,919 | | | 3.28 | |
Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
| | Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
| | North Carolina | | 3,900 | | | 3.27 | |
| City National Bank of Florida | City National Bank of Florida | | Florida | | 1,780 | | | 2.67 | | City National Bank of Florida | | Florida | | 3,108 | | | 2.60 | |
| Cadence Bank, N.A. | | Georgia | | 1,421 | | | 2.13 | | |
| Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company | | Maryland | | 1,206 | | | 1.81 | | |
| Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | | 46,201 | | | 69.28 | | Subtotal (10 largest borrowers) | | 79,986 | | | 67.01 | |
| Subtotal (all other borrowers) | Subtotal (all other borrowers) | | 20,483 | | | 30.72 | | Subtotal (all other borrowers) | | 39,369 | | | 32.99 | |
| Total advances par value and standby letters of credit | Total advances par value and standby letters of credit | | $ | 66,684 | | | 100.00 | | Total advances par value and standby letters of credit | | $ | 119,355 | | | 100.00 | |
Community Investment Services
The Bank’s Affordable Housing Program (AHP)AHP provides no-cost or low-cost funds in the form of a direct subsidy or a subsidized advance to members to support the financing of rental and for-sale housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. The Bank offers the AHP General Fund and AHP Homeownership Set-aside programs. Additionally, the Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) program is offered to members in the form of a discounted advance program that supports projects that provide affordable housing and economic development benefiting those households. A description of each program is as follows:
•the AHP General Fund is offered annually through a competitive application process and provides funds for either new construction or rehabilitation rental or ownership real estate projects submitted through member financial institutions;
•the AHP Homeownership Set-aside program provides funds that can be used by homebuyers for down payment, closing costs, and other costs associated with the purchase, purchase/rehabilitation, or rehabilitation ifof homes for households at or below 80 percent of the area median income. The funds are available on a first-come, first-served basis through member financial institutions and available through the following distinct products: First-time Homebuyer, Community Partners, and Community Rebuild and Restore, and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Structured Partnership Product; andRestore;
•the CICA program consists of the Community Investment Program and the Economic Development Program, which both provide the Bank’s members with access to low-cost funding to create affordable rental and homeownership opportunities and to engage in commercial and economic development activities that benefit low- and moderate-income individuals and neighborhoods.neighborhoods; and
•the Heirs’ Property Prevention and Resolution Voluntary Grant program is available to organizations that presented pilot initiatives during the 2021 Funders’ Forum. Those organizations may apply for up to $100,000 to fund pilot programs designed to prevent and resolve issues of heirs’ property which is a barrier to the accumulation of generational wealth, leads to neighborhood blight, and is a pervasive issue that disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minority, low-wealth, and distressed urban and rural communities. In May 2022, the Bank's board of directors approved the Heirs' Property Prevention and Resolution Voluntary Grant program, allocating $1 million to be available for organizations that submitted pilot initiatives during 2021 “Heirs’ Property Prevention and Resolution Funders’ Forum” (Funders’ Forum).
Each FHLBank must set aside 10 percent of its income subject to assessment for AHP, or such additional prorated sums as may be required so that the aggregate annual contribution of the FHLBanks is not less than $100 million. The aggregate annual
contribution of the FHLBanks exceeded $100 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020. For purposes of the AHP calculation, each FHLBank’s income subject to assessment is defined as the individual FHLBank’s net income before assessments, plus interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The assessment for AHP is further discussed under the Taxation/Assessments heading below. The Bank’s AHP assessments were $28$21 million, $41$15 million, and $46$28 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
In December 2020,2022, the Board approved the Bank’s 2021 Targeted Community Lending Plan (TCLP) which provided an assessment of the community lending and housing related market conditions in the Bank’s district, the emerging trends arising from these conditions and the Bank’s strategic responseBank made a $5 million voluntary non-statutory contribution to these market conditions. The Bank’s strategic response is reflected via the goals, strategies, tactics and measures of success in three areas: products; services; and knowledge sharing. With respect to products, the TCLP addresses the AHP, CICA program, and voluntary programs. There are no new programs in the 2021 TCLP however, there are new application scoring criteria under the AHP General Fund; new products under the AHP Homeownership Set-Aside program; and an elimination of the Community Heroes voluntary program. The TCLP also includes the annual AHP allocation policy. With respect to Services, the TCLP continues the Bank’s focus on its CRA Center of Excellence; outreach to minority serving organizations, and leveraging the Bank’s products to enhance the capacity of shareholder CDFIs, low-income designated credit unions, and minority depository institutions.AHP.
Cash Management and Other Services
The Bank provides a variety of services to help members meet day-to-day cash management needs. These services include cash management services that support member advance activity, such as daily investment accounts, automated clearing house transactions, and custodial mortgage accounts. In addition to cash management services, the Bank provides other noncredit services, including wire transfer services and safekeeping services. These cash management, wire transfer, and safekeeping services do not generate material amounts of income and are performed primarily as ancillary services for the Bank’s members.
The Bank also acts as an intermediary to meet certain derivatives needs of its smaller members that have limited or no access to the capital markets. This service assists members with asset-liability management by giving them indirect access to the capital markets. These intermediary transactions involve the Bank entering into a derivative with a member and then entering into a mirror-image derivative with one of the Bank’s approved counterparties. The derivatives entered into by the Bank as a result of its intermediary activities do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are separately marked to fair value through earnings. The Bank attempts to earn income from this service sufficient to cover its operating expenses through the minor difference in rates on these mirror-image derivatives. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives is not material to the operating results of the Bank. The Bank may require both the member and the counterparty to post collateral for any market value exposure that may exist during the life of the transaction. The Bank has ceased offering intermediated swaps that contain a LIBOR leg, as the Bank transitions away from LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate.
Mortgage Loan Purchase Programs
The Bank’s mortgage loan purchase programs provided members an alternative to holding mortgage loans in a portfolio or selling them into the secondary market. Prior to 2008, the Bank purchased loans directly from member participating financial institutions (PFIs) through the Mortgage Partnership Finance® Program (MPF® Program), a program developed by FHLBank Chicago and the Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP), a program separately established by the Bank. The Bank ceased directly purchasing new mortgage assets under these mortgage programs in 2008. However, the Bank continues to support its existing MPP and MPF Program mortgage loan portfolios. The Bank may also acquire fixed-rate residential mortgage loans through participation in eligible mortgage loans purchased from other FHLBanks.
MPF Program
From time to time, the Bank had offered various products to members through the MPF Program. FHLBank Chicago, as the MPF provider, is responsible for providing transaction processing services, as well as developing and maintaining the underwriting criteria and program servicing guide. The Bank pays FHLBank Chicago a fee for providing these services. Conventional loans purchased from PFIs under the MPF Program are subject to varying levels of loss allocation and credit enhancement structures. Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-guaranteed loans are not subject to the credit enhancement obligations applicable to conventional loans under the MPF Program. The PFI may retain the right and responsibility for servicing the loans or sell the servicing rights, and the PFI may be required to repurchase a loan in the event of a breach of eligibility requirement or other warranty.
The Bank maintains a portfolio of mortgage loans that were historically purchased directly from PFIs and are recorded on the balance sheet. One of the Bank’s PFIs under the traditional MPF products, Truist Bank, was among the Bank’s top 10 borrowers as of December 31, 2020.2022.
Mortgage Partnership Finance® Program, “Mortgage Partnership Finance®”, and “MPF®” are registered trademarks of FHLBank Chicago.
MPP
The Bank’s MPP is independent of other FHLBanks’ mortgage loan programs. Therefore, the Bank hashad greater control over pricing, quality of customer service, relationships with any third-party service providers, and program changes. Certain benefits of greater Bank control include the Bank’s ability to control operating costs and to manage its regulatory relationship directly with the Finance Agency. There were no MPP PFIs that were among the Bank’s top 10 borrowers as of December 31, 2020.2022.
The MPF Program and MPP are authorized under applicable regulations. Regulatory interpretive guidance provides that an FHLBank may sell loans acquired through its mortgage loan purchase programs so long as it also sells the related credit enhancement obligation. The Bank currently is not selling loans it has acquired through these mortgage loan purchase
programs. The Bank maintains a portfolio of mortgage loans that were historically purchased directly from PFIs and are recorded on the balance sheet. The contractual maturity dates of some of the purchased loans extend out to 2047.
Investments
The Bank maintains a portfolio of investment securities and other investments for liquidity purposes to provide for the availability of funds to meet member credit needs and to provide additional earnings for the Bank. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank’s investment securities consist of MBS issued by GSEs or U.S. government agencies; securities issued by the U.S. government or U.S. government agencies; and state and local housing agency obligations. The Bank ceased purchasing private-label MBS in 2008 and in January 2020 the Bank sold its private-label residential MBS portfolio. The investment securities portfolio generally provides the Bank with higher returns than those available in other permissible investments. The Bank’s other investments may consist of interest-bearing deposits, overnight and term federal funds sold, and securities purchased under agreements to resell. U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. agency, and GSE securities were 60.461.9 percent and 53.955.7 percent of the Bank’s total investments as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, as discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition—Investments.Investments. Investments generated 30.930.1 percent, 34.029.5 percent, and 32.430.9 percent of total interest income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.
The Bank’s MBS investment practice is to purchase MBS from a group of Bank-approved dealers, which may include “primary dealers.” Primary dealers are banks and securities brokerages that trade in U.S. government securities with the Federal Reserve System. The Bank does not purchase MBS from its members, except in the case in which a member or its affiliate is on the Bank’s list of approved dealers. In all cases, the Bank bases its investment decisions on the relative rates of return of competing investments and does not consider whether an MBS is being purchased from or issued by a member or an affiliate of a member. The Bank’s MBS balance included a carrying value of $0 and $552 million of MBSdid not include any investments that were issued by one of the Bank’s members or an affiliate of a member as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, respectively. See Note 6—Available-for-sale Securities and Note 7—Held-to-maturity Securities to the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements for a tabular presentation of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities issued by members or affiliates of members.2021.
Finance Agency regulations prohibit an FHLBank from purchasing MBS and asset-backed securities if its investment in such securities exceeds 300 percent of the FHLBank’s previous month-end regulatory capital on the day it purchases the securities. Regulatory capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, the amount paid-in for Class A stock (if any), the amount of the Bank’s general allowance for losses (if any), and the amount of any other instruments identified in the capital plan and approved by the Finance Agency. For discussion regarding the Bank’s compliance with this regulatory requirement, refer to Item 7,7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations—Financial Condition—Investments—Financial Condition—Investments..
Funding Sources
Deposits
The FHLBank Act allows the Bank to accept deposits from its members, any institution for which it is providing correspondent services, other FHLBanks, or other governmental instrumentalities. Deposits provide some of the Bank’s funding resources while also giving members a low-risk earning asset that satisfies their regulatory liquidity requirements. The Bank had demand and overnight deposits of $1.8 billion and $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
To support its member deposits, the FHLBank Act requires the Bank to have an amount equal to or greater than the current deposits received from its members as a reserve. These reserves are required to be invested in obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, or advances with maturities not exceeding five years. The Bank had excess deposit reserves of $115.9 billion and $39.4 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Consolidated Obligations
Consolidated obligations, consisting of bonds and discount notes, are the joint and several obligations of the FHLBanks, backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Consolidated obligations are not obligations of the U.S. government, and the United StatesU.S. does not guarantee the consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance has responsibility for facilitating and executing the issuance of consolidated obligations for all the FHLBanks. It also services all outstanding debt. The Bank is primarily liable for its portion of consolidated obligations (i.e., those issued on its behalf); however, the Bank is also jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on consolidated obligations of all the FHLBanks. Pursuant to other arrangements to which the Bank is bound by, an FHLBank may also be required to make payment of principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation of any other FHLBank upon failure of such FHLBank to meet an obligation. If the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation issued on behalf of the Bank is not paid in full when due, the Bank may not pay any extraordinary expenses or pay dividends to, or redeem or repurchase shares of capital stock from, any member of the Bank. At any time, the Finance Agency may require any FHLBank to make principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation, whether or not the primary obligor FHLBank has defaulted on the payment of that obligation.
To the extent that an FHLBank makes any payment on a consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement from the noncomplying FHLBank. However, if the Finance Agency determines that the noncomplying FHLBank is unable to satisfy its obligations, the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liability among the remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank’s participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding or on any other basis the Finance Agency may determine.
Finance Agency regulations also state that the Bank must maintain the following types of assets that are free from any lien or pledge in an aggregate amount at least equal to the amount of the Bank’s portion of the consolidated obligations outstanding, provided that any assets that are subject to a lien or pledge for the benefit of the holders of any issue of consolidated obligations shall be treated as if they were assets free from any lien or pledge for purposes of this negative pledge requirement:
•cash;
•obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States;
•secured advances;
•mortgages that have any guaranty, insurance, or commitment from the United StatesU.S. or any agency of the United States;U.S.; and
•investments described in Section 16(a) of the FHLBank Act which, among other items, include securities that a fiduciary or trust fund may purchase under the laws of the state in which the FHLBank is located.
The Bank was in compliance with this Finance Agency regulation as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Consolidated obligations are issued with either fixed- or variable-rate coupon payment terms that may use a variety of indices, such as Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)SOFR and Overnight Index Swap (OIS). The Bank, working through the Office of Finance, is able to customize consolidated obligations to meet investor demands. Customized features can include different indices and embedded derivatives. The Bank offsets these customized features predominantly by derivatives to reduce the market risk associated with the consolidated obligations.
Consolidated Obligation Bonds. Consolidated obligation bonds satisfy longer-term funding requirements. Typically, the maturity of these securities ranges from one year to 10 years, but the maturity is not subject to any statutory or regulatory limit. Consolidated obligation bonds can be issued and distributed through negotiated or competitively bid transactions with approved underwriters or selling group members. The FHLBanks also use the TAP issue program for fixed-rate, noncallable bonds. Under this program, the FHLBanks offer debt obligations at specific maturities that may be reopened daily, generally during a three-month period through competitive auctions. The goal of the TAP program is to aggregate frequent smaller issues into a
larger bond issue that may have greater market liquidity.
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes. Through the Office of Finance, the FHLBanks also issue consolidated obligation discount notes to provide short-term funds for advances to members, for the Bank’s other investments, and for the Bank’s variable-rate and convertible advance programs. These securities have maturities up to 366 days and are offered daily through a consolidated obligation discount note selling group. Discount notes are issued at a discount and mature at par.
Certification and Reporting Obligations. Under Finance Agency regulations, before the end of each calendar quarter and before paying any dividends for that quarter, the president of the Bank must certify to the Finance Agency that, based upon known current facts and financial information, the Bank will remain in compliance with applicable liquidity requirements and will remain capable of making full and timely payments of all current obligations (which includes the Bank’s obligation to pay principal and interest on consolidated obligations issued on its behalf through the Office of Finance) coming due during the next quarter. The Bank is required to provide notice to the Finance Agency upon the occurrence of any of the following:
•the Bank is unable to provide the required certification;
•the Bank projects, at any time, that it will fail to comply with its liquidity requirements or will be unable to meet all of its current obligations due during the quarter;
•the Bank actually fails to comply with its liquidity requirements or to meet all of its current obligations due during the quarter; or
•the Bank negotiates to enter or enters into an agreement with one or more other FHLBanks to obtain financial assistance to meet its current obligations due during the quarter.
The Bank must file a consolidated obligation payment plan for Finance Agency approval upon the occurrence of any of the following:
•the Bank becomes a noncomplying FHLBank as a result of failing to provide a required certification related to liquidity requirements and ability to meet all current obligations;
•the Bank becomes a noncomplying FHLBank as a result of being required to provide notice to the Finance Agency of certain matters related to liquidity requirements or inability to meet current obligations; or
•the Finance Agency determines that the Bank will cease to be in compliance with its liquidity requirements or will lack the capacity to meet all of its current obligations due during the quarter.
Regulations permit a noncompliant FHLBank to continue to incur and pay normal operating expenses in the regular course of business. However, a noncompliant FHLBank may not incur or pay any extraordinary expenses, declare or pay dividends, or redeem any capital stock until the Finance Agency has approved the FHLBank’s consolidated obligation payment plan or inter-FHLBank assistance agreement or has ordered another remedy, and the noncompliant FHLBank has paid all its direct obligations.
Deposits
The FHLBank Act allows the Bank to accept deposits from its members, any institution for which it is providing correspondent services, other FHLBanks, or other governmental instrumentalities. Deposits provide some of the Bank’s funding resources while also giving members a low-risk earning asset that satisfies their regulatory liquidity requirements. The Bank had demand and overnight deposits of $2.0 billion and $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
To support its member deposits, the FHLBank Act requires the Bank to have an amount equal to or greater than the current deposits received from its members as a reserve. These reserves are required to be invested in obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, or advances with maturities not exceeding five years. The Bank had excess deposit reserves of $42.6 billion and $98.5 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Capital and Capital Rules
The Bank must comply with regulatory requirements for total regulatory capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital. To satisfy these capital requirements, the Bank maintains a capital plan. Each member’s minimum stock requirement is an amount equal to the sum of a “membership” stock component and an “activity-based” stock component under the capital plan. The FHLBank Act and applicable regulations require that the minimum stock requirement for members must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet its minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements. If necessary, the Bank may adjust the minimum stock requirement from time to time within the ranges established in the capital plan. Each member is required to comply promptly with any adjustment to the minimum stock requirement.
As of December 31, 2020,2022, the membership stock requirement was 0.090.05 percent (nine(five basis points) of the member’s total assets, subject to a cap of $15 million.
As of December 31, 2020,2022, the activity-based stock requirement was the sum of the following:
•4.25 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances; and
•8.00 percent of any outstanding targeted debt or equity investment (such as multifamily residential mortgage loan assets) sold by the member to the Bank on or after December 17, 2004.2004; and
On January 29, 2021, the board of directors approved an adjustment to the membership stock requirement to 0.05•0.10 percent (five(ten basis points) of the member’s total assets, and an adjustmentmembers’ outstanding standby letters of the cap to $16.20 million, as well as an adjustment to the activity-based stock requirement to 3.75 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances. These changes become effective March 19, 2021.credit.
In addition, the activity-based stock requirement may include a percentage of any outstanding balance of acquired member assets (such as residential mortgage loan assets), although this percentagewhich was set at zero as of December 31, 2020. The2022. Since the Bank did not have any multifamily residential mortgage loan assets purchased from members or other targeted debt or equity investments outstanding; therefore,outstanding, the 8.00 percent activity-basedtargeted debt or equity investment stock requirement was inapplicable as of December 31, 2020. Currently, the Bank does not have a capital stock requirement for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Bank has received regulatory communication relating to the inclusion of an activity stock requirement for standby letters of credit, the specific terms of which are being assessed by the Bank, and any such requirement will need to be included in an amended capital plan, which would require both approval of the Bank’s board of directors and the Finance Agency.2022.
Although applicable regulations allow the Bank to issue Class A stock, or Class B stock, or both in any combination, to its members, the Bank’s capital plan allows it to issue only Class B stock.
Derivatives
Finance Agency regulations and the Bank’s Risk Management Policy (RMP) establish guidelines for derivatives. These policies and regulations prohibit the trading or speculative use of these instruments and limit permissible credit risk arising from these instruments. The Bank enters into derivatives to manage the exposure to interest-rate risk inherent in otherwise unhedged assets and funding positions, to achieve the Bank’s risk management objectives, and to act as an intermediary between its members and counterparties. These derivatives consist of interest-rate swaps (including callable and putable swaps), swaptions, interest-rate cap and floor agreements, and forward contracts. Generally, the Bank uses derivatives in its overall interest-rate risk management to accomplish one or more of the following objectives:
•preserve a favorable interest-rate spread between the yield of an asset (e.g., an advance) and the cost of the related liability (e.g., the consolidated obligation bond used to fund the advance) by converting both fixed-rate instruments to a variable rate using interest-rate swaps;
•reduce funding costs by combining a derivative with a consolidated obligation because the cost of a combined funding structure can be lower than the cost of a comparable consolidated obligation bond;
•reduce the interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
•mitigate the adverse earnings effects of the shortening or lengthening of certain assets (e.g., mortgage assets) and liabilities;
•protect the value of existing asset or liability positions;
•manage embedded options in assets and liabilities; and
•achieve overall asset/liability management objectives.
The total notional amount of the Bank’s outstanding derivatives was $35.1$81.7 billion and $81.2$50.4 billion as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. The contractual or notional amount of a derivative is not a measure of the amount of credit risk from that transaction; rather, the notional amount serves as a basis for calculating periodic interest payments or cash flows.
The Bank may enter into derivatives concurrently with the issuance of consolidated obligations with embedded options. When issuing bonds, the Bank generally simultaneously enters into derivatives to, in effect, convert fixed-rate liabilities into variable-rate liabilities. The continued attractiveness of such debt depends on price relationships in both the bond and derivatives markets. If conditions in these markets change, the Bank may alter the types or terms of the bonds issued. Similarly, the Bank may enter into derivatives in conjunction with the origination of advances with embedded options. Issuing fixed-rate advances while simultaneously entering into derivatives, in effect, converts fixed-rate advances into variable-rate earning assets.
Competition
Advances. A number of factors affect demand for the Bank’s advances, including, but not limited to, the availability and cost of other sources of liquidity for the Bank’s members, such as demand deposits, brokered deposits, and the repurchase market. The Bank individually competes with other suppliers of secured and unsecured wholesale funding. Such other suppliers may include the U.S. government, investment banks, commercial banks, and in certain circumstances, other FHLBanks. Smaller members may have access to alternative funding sources through sales of securities under agreements to repurchase, while larger members may have access to all the alternatives listed above. Larger members also may have independent access to the national and global credit markets. The availability of alternative funding sources to members can significantly influence the demand for the Bank’s advances and can vary as a result of a number of factors, including market conditions, member liquidity levels, members’ creditworthiness, and availability of collateral.
Debt Issuance. The Bank competes with Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), other GSEs, and the U.S. Treasury, as well as corporate and supranational entities for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs or lesser amounts of debt issued at the same cost than otherwise would be the case. In addition, the availability and cost of funds raised through the issuance of certain types of unsecured debt may be affected adversely by regulatory initiatives that tend to reduce investments by certain depository institutions in unsecured debt with greater price volatility or interest-rate sensitivity than fixed-rate, fixed-maturity instruments of the same maturity. Further, a perceived or actual higher level of government support for other GSEs may increase demand for their debt securities relative to similar FHLBank securities.
Interest-rate Exchange Agreements. The sale of callable debt and the simultaneous execution of callable interest-rate swaps that mirror the debt have been important sources of competitive funding for the Bank. As such, the availability of markets for callable debt and interest-rate swaps may be an important determinant of the Bank’s relative cost of funds. There is considerable competition among high credit quality issuers in the markets for these instruments.
Regulatory Oversight, Audits, and Examinations
The Bank’s business is subject to extensive regulation and supervision. The laws and regulations to which the Bank is subject cover all key aspects of its business, and directly and indirectly affect the Bank’s product and service offerings, pricing, competitive position and strategic plan, relationship with members and third parties, capital structure, cash needs and uses, and information security. As discussed throughout this Report, such laws and regulations may have a significant effect on key drivers of the Bank’s results of operations, including, for example, the Bank’s capital and liquidity, product and service offerings, risk management, and costs of compliance.
The Finance Agency supervises and regulates the FHLBanks. The Finance Agency is responsible for ensuring that (1) the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner, including maintenance of adequate capital and internal controls; (2) the operations and activities of the FHLBanks foster liquid, efficient, competitive, and resilient national housing finance markets; (3) the FHLBanks comply with applicable laws and regulations; and (4) the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission through authorized activities that are consistent with the public interest. In this capacity, the Finance Agency issues regulations and policies that govern, among other things, the permissible activities, powers, investments, risk-management practices, and capital requirements of the FHLBanks, and the authorities and duties of FHLBank directors. The Finance Agency conducts annual, on-site examinations of the Bank, as well as periodic off-site reviews. In addition, the Bank must submit monthly financial information on the condition and results of operations of the Bank to the Finance Agency. The Bank is also subject to regulation by the SEC, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, (FinCEN), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The Government Corporation Control Act provides that, before a government corporation (which includes each of the FHLBanks) issues and offers obligations to the public, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe (1) the form, denomination, maturity, interest rate, and conditions of the obligations; (2) the time and manner in which issued; and (3) the selling price. Under the FHLBank Act, the Secretary of the Treasury has the authority, at his or her discretion, to purchase consolidated obligations up to an aggregate principal amount of $4.0 billion. No borrowings under this authority have been outstanding since 1977.
The Comptroller General has authority under the FHLBank Act to audit or examine the Finance Agency and the Bank and to decide the extent to which they fairly and effectively fulfill the purposes of the FHLBank Act. Furthermore, the Government Corporation Control Act provides that the Comptroller General may review any audit of the financial statements conducted by an independent registered public accounting firm. If the Comptroller General conducts such a review, he or she must report the results and provide his or her recommendations to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget, and the FHLBank in
question. The Comptroller General also may conduct his or her own audit of any financial statements of the Bank. The Bank was not reviewed or audited by the Comptroller General in 2022.
The Bank has an internal audit department; the Bank’s board of directors has an audit committee; and an independent registered public accounting firm audits the annual financial statements of the Bank. The independent registered public accounting firm conducts these audits following the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General. The Finance Agency receives the Bank’s Report and audited financial statements. The Bank must submit annual management reports to Congress, the President of the United States, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Comptroller General. These reports include audited financial statements, a statement of internal accounting and administrative control systems, and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements.
Available Information
The Bank’s website is located at www.fhlbatl.com. The content of the Bank’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Report or in any other report or document that the Bank files with the SEC, and any references to the Bank’s website are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Human Capital Resources
The Bank’s human capital is a significant contributor to the achievement of our strategic business objectives. In managing our human capital, the Bank focuses on its workforce profile and the various programs and philosophies described below.
Workforce Profile
The Bank’s workforce is primarily comprised of corporate employees, with the Bank’s principal operations in one location. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank had 322316 full-time and two3 part-time employees. As of December 31, 2020,2022, approximately 46.3
45.8 percent of the Bank’s workforce is female, 53.754.2 percent male, 53.150.2 percent non-minority and 46.949.8 percent minority. The Bank’s workforce is leanly staffed, and historically has included a number of longer-tenured employees. As of December 31, 2022, the average tenure of the Bank’s employees was 10.3 years. The Bank strives to both develop talent from within the organization and supplement with external hires. The Bank believes that developing talent internally results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes loyalty and commitment in the Bank’s employee base, which furthers its success, while adding new employees contributes to new ideas, continuous improvement, and the Bank’s goals of a diverse and inclusive workforce. As of December 31, 2020, the average tenure of the Bank’s employees was 11.5 years. There are no collective bargaining agreements with the Bank’s employees.
Total Rewards
The Bank seeks to attract, develop, engage, and retain a diverse group of talented employees to achieve its strategic business initiatives, enhance business performance and increase shareholder value. The Bank supports this objectiveBank’s Employer of Choice strategy is supported by sponsoring a combination, of compensation of talent management, benefits development, and employee wellness programs. Specifically, the Bank’s programs include:
•Cash based compensation -– base salary, performance based incentives, service awards, and spot bonus program;
•Benefits – retirement plan benefits, health insurance coverage, flexible spending accounts, life and AD&Daccidental death and dismemberment insurance, supplemental life insurance, and disability insurance;
•Wellness – onsite fitness center, employeeLearning and development programs –internal and external programs focused on coaching and leadership development, skills development, diversity, equity and inclusion-based learning, an educational assistance program health coaching and interactive education sessions;professional certification assistance;
•Culture and Community Support – internal groups with various opportunities for participation, communication, sharing, learning, community and cultural and inclusion initiatives;
•Work/Life balance – Time away from workinitiatives, community involvement including time off for vacation, sick, personal, holidays, voting, jury duty, bereavementa charitable contribution matching program and volunteer opportunities, parental and military leave and flexible work arrangements including remote working options;hours;
•
Development programs and training – Internal and external programs focused on leadership development, skills development, employee engagement, and the Bank’s EmployerTable of Choice strategyContents; educational assistance program and professional certification assistance; and•Succession planning – the Bank’s board of directors and leadership actively engage in succession planning, with defined plans for executive level positions and positions reporting directly to department leaders, as well as identified critical roles.roles;
•Work/Life balance – time away from work including time off for vacation, sick, personal, holidays, voting, jury duty and bereavement, parental and military leave and flexible work arrangements including a hybrid work model, reduced workweek and flexible schedules; and
•Wellness – onsite fitness center, employee assistance program, health coaching and interactive financial, physical and mental well-being education opportunities.
The Bank’s Performance Management program provides a framework for managing and developing employee performance including accomplishment of individual and team objectives.objectives within the Bank’s incentive compensation program. Annual ratings are based on established competencies and a consistent rating scale. The use of both a qualitative and quantitative rating scale allow managers to align pay and help differentiatediscuss performance and recognize high performers.
The Bank is committed to the health, safety and wellness of its employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank has implemented significant operating environment changes, safety protocols and procedures that it determined were in the best interest of the Bank’s employees and members, and which comply with government regulations. This includes having a significant portion of the Bank’s employees work remotely, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work.development.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Program
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) is a strategic business priority for the Bank. The Bank’s diversity and inclusionDE&I officer is a member of the senior management team, reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer and serves as a liaison to the board of directors. The Bank recognizes that diversity increases capacity for innovation and creativity and that equity and inclusion allows the Bank to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthens the Bank’s retention efforts. The Bank operationalizes its commitment through the development and execution of a three-year diversity, equity and inclusion strategic plan that includes quantifiable metrics to measure its successsuccess. The board and it reports regularly on itsmanagement monitor the Bank’s performance to management andagainst the board of directors.strategic plan goals via regular reporting. The BanksBank offers a range of opportunities for its employees to connect, and grow personally and professionally through its diversity and inclusionDE&I council and event planning groups. The Bank considers learning an important component of its diversity and inclusionDE&I strategy and regularly offers educational opportunities to its employees and evaluates inclusive behaviors as part of the Bank’s annual performance management and succession planning process. The Bank also incorporates diversity and inclusionDE&I as a key component of its incentive plan framework to ensurehelp organizational focus and accountability.
Environmental, Social, and Governance
Taxation/Assessments
The Bank is exempt from ordinary federal, state, and local taxation, except employment and real property taxes. However, each FHLBank must set aside 10 percent of their income subject to assessment for the AHP, or such additional prorated sums as may be required so that the aggregate annual contribution of the FHLBanks is not less than $100 million. The aggregate annual contribution of the FHLBanks exceeded $100 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020. For purposes of the AHP calculation, each FHLBank’s income subject to assessment is defined as the individual FHLBank’s net income before assessments, plus interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable capital stock. If an FHLBank experiences a net loss for a full year, the FHLBank would have no obligation to the AHP for that year since each FHLBank’s required annual AHP contribution is limited to its annual income subject to assessment. AHP assessments for the Bank were $28$21 million, $41$15 million, and $46$28 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The following discussion summarizes some of the more important risks that the Bank faces. This discussion is not exhaustive, and there may be other risks that the Bank faces, which are not described below. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information included in this Report, including, without limitation, in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the financial statementsFinancial Statements and notes,Supplemental Data, and “Special“Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-looking Statements.” The risks described below, if realized, could negatively impact the Bank’s business operations, financial condition, and future results of operations and, among other things, could result in the Bank’s inability to pay dividends on, and/or repurchase or redeem, its capital stock.
Business and Regulatory Risk
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact around the world, prompting federal, state, and relatedlocal governments and businesses to take unprecedented measures in response. These developments could increase many of the riskcertain risks faced by the Bank and adversely affect the Bank’s profitabilityresults of operations and financial condition.
The impact of widespread health emergencies may adversely impact the Bank’s results of operations, such as the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic, hasalong with the governmental and public action in response to date caused significant economicthe pandemic, have created uncertainty and financial volatility bothdisruptions in the U.S.overall economic environment. Government and around the world, and has led to a global recession. Many businesses in the Bank’s district and across the U.S. have, at times, been forced to suspend operations for an indefinite period of time in an attempt to slow the spread of the virus, and unemployment claims increased dramatically as more employers laid off workers. Ultimately, the significant slowdown in economic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could further reduce demand at our member institutions, which could impact members’ demand for our products and services. It could also lead to a devaluation of our assets and/or the collateral pledged by the Bank’s members to secure advances and other extensions of credit, or increase credit losses, including as a result of increased forbearances granted by the Bank’s members, all of which could have an adverse impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. As of the date of the filing of this Report, the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to evolve and are unknowable.
The Bank’s ability to obtain funds through the issuance of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets (including investor demand), such as the effects of any reduced liquidity in financial markets, which are beyond the Bank’s control. Volatility in the capital markets caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could impact demand for the Bank’s debt and the cost of the debt the Bank issues, which could impact the Bank’s liquidity and profitability. The Bank’s business and results of operations are affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. government, foreign governments and their agencies. The Federal Reserve Board’s policies directlymeasures aiming at increasing market liquidity contributed to a significant decrease in advance demand from Bank’s members during the initial years of the pandemic. More recently, supply chain disruptions caused by lockdowns and indirectly influencechanging consumer behaviors related to the yield onpandemic have contributed to an inflationary environmentin the Bank’s interest-earning assetsUnited States, creating market uncertainty regarding the Federal Reserve’s actions and the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities. In response to COVID-19, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered and has maintained the target range for federal funds at 0.00 percent to 0.25 percent. The outlook for 2021 and beyond is uncertain, and it is likely that the FOMC will keep interest rates low or even use negative interest rates if economic conditions warrant, each of which could affect the success of Bank’s asset and liability management activities and negatively affect the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
At this time, the Bank is in Phase 2 of its return to office plan, whereby approximately 75 percentfuture state of the Bank’s employees are working remotely.economy. The Bank cannot currently predict when its full employee base will be permittedcontinues to return to work in our offices. With mostmonitor the impact of the Bank’s employees working remotely, the Bank could face operational difficulties or disruptions that could impair its ability to conductthese increased risks and manage its business effectively. In addition, some, most or all of the Bank’s employees, executive management team, or board of directors could become infected with the COVID-19 virus which, depending upon the number and the severity of their cases, could similarly affect the Bank’s ability to conduct and manage its business effectively. Counterparties, vendors and other third parties upon which the Bank relies to conduct its business could be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic which could, in turn, lead to operational challenges for the Bank. These potential difficulties,
disruptions and challenges could increase the likelihood that the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations could be impacted.
Significant borrower defaults on loans made by the Bank’s members could occur as a result of reduced economic activity and these defaults could cause members to fail. The Bank could be adversely impacted by the reduction in business volume that would arise from the failure of one or more of the Bank’s members. Further, counterparty default, whether as a result of the operational or financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, could adversely impact the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (Pension Plan), a tax qualified defined benefit pension plan. A prolonged negative impact on the value of stocks and other asset classes in the Pension Plan due to the COVID-19 pandemic may result in a significant reduction to pension plan asset values and increased pension liability, requiring the Bank to increase its contribution amount, which could negatively impact the Bank’s profitability.
The Bank is subject to a complex body of laws and regulations, which could change or be applied in a manner detrimental to the Bank’s operations.
The FHLBanks are GSEs, organized under the authority of the FHLBank Act, and governed by federal laws and regulations as adopted and applied by the Finance Agency. Congress may amend the FHLBank Act or amend or adopt other statutes in ways that significantly affect the rights and obligations of the FHLBanks and the manner in which the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission and business operations. New or modified legislation enacted by Congress or regulatory requirements applied or imposed by the Finance Agency or other financial services regulators could have a negative effect on the Bank’s ability to conduct business or on the cost of doing business. For example, from time to time, there have been several legislative efforts and policy proposals regarding reform of the federal support of U.S. housing finance, specifically targeting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If implemented, these plans may also directly and indirectly impact other GSEs that support the U.S. housing market, including the FHLBanks. In addition, certain regulations affecting ourthe Bank’s members could impact the extent to which they can engage in business with the Bank.
Changes or inconsistency in statutory or regulatory requirements, or their application, could result in, among other things, an increase in the FHLBanks’ cost of funding and regulatory compliance; a change in membership or permissible business activities; additional liquidity and capital requirements; orrequirements (including whether a member meets required tangible capital levels to access advances); a decrease in the size, scope, or nature of the FHLBanks’ lending or investment activities, any of which could negatively impact the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
In 2022, the Finance Agency initiated a comprehensive review of the FHLBank System. This review is expected to culminate with a written report from the Finance Agency. Such report may include recommendations for statutory revisions, proposals for new or modified regulations, regulatory guidance under existing regulations, and/or other regulatory or supervisory actions consistent with the Finance Agency’s statutory authority.
The Bank cannot predict what regulations will be issued or revised, or which legislation will be enacted or repealed, and nor the effect of any such regulations or legislation on the Bank’s business operations and/or financial condition. Legislative, regulatory, or other changes could result in, for example, an increase in the Bank's cost of funding, a change in permissible business activities, changes in membership, limitations on advances made to members, an increase in the mandatory contribution to affordable housing or community development programs, or a decrease in the size, scope, or nature of the Bank's lending, investment, or mortgage-financing activities, any of which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Competition for advances and refinancing risk on short-term advances could have an adverse effect on earnings.
We operateThe Bank operates in a highly competitive environment. Advances are the Bank’s primary product offering and represented 56.572.3 percent of the Bank’s total assets for the year ended December 31, 2020.2022. Demand for advances is affected by, among other factors, the cost and availability of other sources of liquidity for the Bank’s members, including deposits. The Bank competes with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. Such other suppliers may include the United StatesU.S. government, investment banks, commercial banks and, in certain circumstances, other FHLBanks with which members have a relationship through affiliates. Large institutions may also have independent access to the national and global credit markets. From time to time, these alternative funding sources may offer more favorable terms on their loans than the Bank does on its advances. Any change made by the Bank in the pricing of its advances in an effort to effectively compete with these competitive funding sources may decrease the Bank’s profitability on advances, which could have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations, including dividend yields to members.
The prolonged low interest rate environment has resulted in a concentration of short-term advances. The Bank expects this short-term advance preference to continue during 2021. If members do not extend or renew these short-term advances as they come due, the Bank may experience a significant reduction in advances, which could have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. Advances due in one year or less comprised 46.1 percent of the Bank’s total advances outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
The Bank is exposed to risks because of customer concentration.
The Bank is subject to customer concentration risk as a result of the Bank’s reliance on a relatively small number of member institutions for a large portion of the Bank’s total advances and resulting interest income. The Bank’s largest borrowersborrower as of
December 31, 2020, were TIAA, FSB,2022, was Truist Bank, which accounted for $7.6$29.7 billion, or 15.0 percent, Bank of America, National Association, which accounted for $7.5 billion, or 14.8 percent, and Navy Federal Credit Union, which accounted for $6.5 billion, or 12.826.9 percent of the Bank’s total advances then outstanding. In addition, as of December 31, 2020,2022, 10 of the Bank’s member institutions (including TIAA, FSB;(which includes Truist Bank of America, National Association; and Navy Federal Credit Union)) collectively accounted for $36.3$75.5 billion, or 71.668.4 percent, of the Bank’s total advances then outstanding. The financial services industry continues to experience consolidation, including among the Bank’s members. If one or more of the Bank’s largest borrowers ceased membership, or if the Bank were to experience a decrease in the amount of business with one or more of its largest borrowers, whether as the result of a merger or other transaction, or as a result of market conditions, competition or otherwise, the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.
Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate may have an impact on the Bank’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
On July 27, 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, a regulator of financial services firms in the United Kingdom, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. Although the administrator of LIBOR has more recently expressed its intention to not cease publication of U.S. LIBOR rates for some tenors until June 30, 2023, there can be no assurance that LIBOR rates, of any particular currency or tenor, will continue to be published through any particular date.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee, which was convened by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in order to identify best practices for alternative reference rates, identify best practices for contract robustness, develop an adoption plan, and create an implementation plan with metrics of success and a timeline, has proposed the SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in April 2018. SOFR is intended to be a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. As noted throughout this Report, many of the Bank’s assets and liabilities were historically indexed to LIBOR. The Bank is evaluating the potential impact of and planning for the eventual replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including the probability of SOFR as the dominant replacement. In 2020, the Bank ceased entering into LIBOR financial transactions with maturities that extend beyond 2021. The market transition away from LIBOR may continue to be complicated and present uncertainties. While market and industry participants have worked to achieve consistency in the conventions for cash products and derivatives used to hedge them, they may not always align for legacy transactions. There can be no guarantee that alternatives may or may not be developed with additional complications. The Bank is not able to predict whether SOFR will become a widely accepted benchmark in place of LIBOR, or what the impact of a possible transition to SOFR or an alternate replacement will have on the Bank’s business, financial condition, or results of operations.
An increase in the percentage of AHP contributions that the Bank is required to make could decrease the Bank’s dividends payable to its members.
If the aggregate AHP contributions of the FHLBanks were to fall below $100 million, the Finance Agency would prorate the remaining sums among the FHLBanks, subject to certain conditions, as may be required to meet the minimum $100 million annual contribution. Increasing the Bank’s AHP contribution in such a scenario would reduce the Bank’s earnings and potentially reduce the dividend paid to members.
Liquidity Risk
The Bank’s funding depends upon its ability to regularly access the capital markets.
The Bank’s primary source of funds is from the sale of consolidated obligations in the capital markets, including the short-term discount note market. The Bank competes with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, other GSEs, and the U.S. Treasury, as well as corporate and supranational entities for funds raised through the issuance of consolidated obligations. The Bank’s ability to obtain funds through the sale of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets (including investor demand), such as the effects of any reduced liquidity in financial markets, which are beyond the Bank’s control. The failure to obtain such funds on terms and conditions favorable to the Bank could adversely impact the Bank’s ability to manage its future liquidity.
Compliance with regulatory contingency liquidity guidance could restrict investment activities and adversely impact net interest income.
Liquidity is necessary to satisfy members’ borrowing needs on a timely basis, repay maturing and called consolidated obligations, and meet other obligations and operating requirements. Many members rely on the Bank as a source of standby liquidity, so the Bank attempts to be in a position to meet member funding needs on a timely basis. The Bank complies with regulatory liquidity requirements, which are designed to provide sufficient liquidity and to protect against temporary disruptions in the capital markets that affect the FHLB System's access to funding. In 2018, theAdditionally, Finance Agency issued newincreased liquidity requirements into enable the Bank to provide advances and fund letters of credit for members during a separate regulatory directive. These liquidity requirements have requiredsustained capital markets disruption and which therefore may require the Bank to hold an additionalincreased amount of liquid assets, which could make it more challenging forhinder the BankBank’s ability to meetsmeet its core mission asset ratio, and could reduce the Bank’s ability to invest in higher-yielding assets and adversely impact net interest income.
Market Risk
Changes in interest rates could significantly affect the Bank’s earnings.
Like many financial institutions, the Bank realizes income primarily from the spread between interest earned on the Bank’s outstanding advances and investments and interest paid on the Bank’s borrowings and other liabilities. Although the Bank uses a number of measures to monitor and manage changes in interest rates, the Bank may experience “gaps” in the interest-rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities resulting from duration mismatches. The existence of gaps in interest-rate sensitivities means that either the Bank’s interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in interest rates than its interest-earning assets, or vice versa. In either case, if interest rates move contrary to the Bank’s position, any such gap could adversely affect the net present value of the Bank’s interest-sensitive assets and liabilities, which could negatively affect the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank’s businesses and results of operations are affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. government, foreign governments and their agencies. The Federal Reserve Board’s policies directly and indirectly influence the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could affect the success of the Bank’s asset and liability management activities and negatively affect the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Net Interest Income for further discussion of the Bank’s yield on assets and interest-rate spread.
The Bank relies upon derivative instruments to reduce its interest-rate risk associated with certain assets and liabilities on the Bank's balance sheet, including MBS and advances, and the Bank may be required to change its investment strategies and advance product offerings if it is not able to enter into effective derivative instruments on acceptable terms.
The Bank uses a significant amount of derivative instruments to attempt to reduce its interest-rate risk and mortgage prepayment risk. The Bank determines the nature and quantity of hedging transactions based on various factors, including market conditions and the expected volume and terms of advances. As a result, the Bank's effective use of these instruments depends on the ability of the Bank to determine the appropriate hedging positions in light of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and prevailing and anticipated market conditions. In addition, the effectiveness of the Bank's hedging strategy depends upon the Bank's ability to enter into these instruments with acceptable parties, upon terms satisfactory to the Bank, and in the quantities necessary to hedge the Bank's corresponding financial instruments.
Certain changes to statutory and regulatory requirements for derivative transactions, including rules that would subject non-cleared swaps to a mandatory two-way initial margin requirement, among other things, could adversely affect the liquidity and pricing of derivative transactions entered into by the Bank, making derivative trades more costly and less attractive as risk management tools. As of June 30, 2020, the Bank ceased swapping new transactions to LIBOR in accordance with the supervisory letter issued by the Finance Agency. Many of the Bank’s legacy derivative instruments are swapped to LIBOR-based rates and indices, and there can be no assurances that ongoing efforts to transition away from LIBOR, including the market’s adoption of alternative benchmarks and new contractual terms for legacy transactions, will not adversely affect the trading market or value of derivatives.
If the Bank is unable to manage its hedging positions properly or is unable to enter into hedging instruments upon acceptable terms, the Bank may be unable to manage its interest-rate and other risks or may be required to change its investment strategies and advance product offerings, which could affect the Bank's financial condition and results of operations.
Prepayment or refinancing of mortgage assets could affect earnings.
The Bank invests in MBS and has at times invested in whole mortgage loans. Changes in interest rates can significantly affect the prepayment patterns of these assets, and such prepayment patterns could affect the Bank’s earnings. In the Bank’s experience, it is difficult to hedge prepayment risk in mortgage loans. Therefore, prepayments of mortgage assets could have an adverse effect on the income of the Bank.
The Bank may not be able to pay dividends or to repurchase or redeem members’ capital stock consistent with past practice.
The Bank’s board of directors may declare dividends on the Bank’s capital stock, payable to members, from the Bank’s unrestricted retained earnings and current net earnings. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends and to repurchase or redeem capital stock is subject to compliance with statutory and regulatory liquidity and capital requirements. The Bank’s financial management policy addresses regulatory guidance issued to all FHLBanks regarding retained earnings. It requires the Bank to establish a target amount of retained earnings by considering factors such as forecasted income, mark-to-market adjustments on derivatives, and trading securities, market risk, operational risk, and credit risk, all of which may be influenced by events beyond the Bank’s control. The Bank’s capital plan addresses minimum regulatory capital requirements. Events such as changes in interest rates, collateral value, credit quality of members, changes to regulatory capital requirements, and any future credit losses, may affect the adequacy of the Bank’s retained earnings and may require the Bank to reduce its dividends, suspend dividends altogether, or limit capital stock repurchases and redemptions to achieve and maintain the targeted amount of retained earnings or regulatory capital requirements. These actions could cause a reduction in members’ demand for advances, or make it difficult for the Bank to retain existing members or to attract new members.
During 2020, in response to monetary and fiscal stimulus related to the global pandemic associated with COVID-19, market interest rates declined significantly. The decrease in market interest rates has impacted the Bank’s income on interest-earning assets and net income. Additionally, these stimulus actions have resulted in lower demand from the Bank’s members for advances, further impacting net income. The Bank expects that the current low market interest rate environment, as well as decreased advance demand, may continue into the foreseeable future which could decrease the Bank’s future net income. As such, the amount that the Bank pays as dividends could be impacted.
Credit Risk
The Bank’s exposure to credit risk could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank faces credit risk on advances, standby letters of credit, investments, derivatives, and mortgage loan assets. The Bank requires advances and standby letters of credit to be fully secured with collateral. The Bank evaluates the types of collateral pledged by the member and assigns a borrowing capacity to the collateral, based on the risk associated with that type of collateral. If the Bank has insufficient collateral before or after an event of payment default or failure of the member or the Bank is unable to liquidate the collateral for the value assigned to it in the event of a payment default or failure of a member, the Bank could experience a credit loss on advances or standby letters of credit, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank assumes secured and unsecured credit risk exposure associated with securities transactions, money market transactions, supplemental mortgage insurance agreements, and derivative contracts. The Bank routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. The insolvency or other inability of a significant counterparty to perform its obligations under a derivative contract or other agreement could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. The Bank’s credit risk may be exacerbated based on market movements that impact the value of the derivative or collateral positions, the failure of a counterparty to return collateral to the Bank, or when the collateral pledged to the Bank cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Bank. Any failure to properly perfect the Bank’s security interest in collateral or any disruption in the servicing of collateral in the event of a default could create credit losses for the Bank.
The Bank uses master derivative contracts that contain provisions that require the Bank to net the exposure under all transactions with a counterparty to one amount in order to calculate collateral requirements. Although the Bank attempts to monitor the creditworthiness of all counterparties, it is possible that the Bank may not be able to terminate the agreement with a foreign commercial bank before the counterparty would become subject to an insolvency proceeding.
The Bank is jointly and severally liable for payment of principal and interest on the consolidated obligations issued by the other FHLBanks.FHLBanks and for jointly maintaining a minimum aggregate amount of AHP contributions
Each of the FHLBanks relies upon the issuance of consolidated obligations as a primary source of funds. Consolidated obligations are the joint and several obligations of all of the FHLBanks, backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Accordingly, the Bank is jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the consolidated obligations issued by the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance.
ThePursuant to Finance Agency by regulation, an FHLBank may require any FHLBankbe required to make principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation, of another FHLBank, at any time, whether or nottime. Pursuant to other arrangements to which the Bank is bound by, an FHLBank that was the primary obligor has defaulted on themay be required to make payment of that obligation. The Finance Agency may allocate the liability among oneprincipal or more FHLBanks on a pro rata basis orinterest payments due on any consolidated obligation of any other basis the Finance Agency may determine.FHLBank upon failure of such FHLBank to meet an obligation. Accordingly, the Bank could incur significant liability beyond its primary obligation under consolidated obligations due to the failure of other FHLBanks to meet their obligations, which could negatively impact the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
If the aggregate AHP contributions of the FHLBanks were to fall below $100 million, the Finance Agency would prorate the remaining sums among the FHLBanks, subject to certain conditions, as may be required to meet the minimum $100 million annual contribution.
Changes in the Bank’s credit ratings may adversely affect the Bank’s ability to issue consolidated obligations on acceptable terms, and such changes may be outside the Bank’s control due to changes in the U.S. sovereign ratings.
As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank has an issuer credit rating of Aaa/P-1 by Moody's Investors Service (Moody’s) and AA+/A-1+ by Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (S&P). The consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks (consolidated bonds and consolidated discount notes) carry credit ratings of Aaa/P-1 by Moody’s and AA+/A-1+ by S&P. All ratings are with a stable outlook. Because of the FHLBanks’ GSE status, the credit ratings of the FHLBank System and the FHLBanks are directly influenced by the sovereign credit of the U.S., which is beyond the Bank’s control. Downgrades to the U.S. sovereign credit rating and outlook would likely result in downgrades in the credit ratings and outlook on the Bank and the consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks even though the consolidated obligations are not obligations of the United States. More recently, increased concerns on the potential failure by the U.S. to address its statutory debt ceiling in a timely manner and continued
uncertainty relating to the debt limit, have increased the possibility of potential credit-rating downgrades to the U.S. sovereign credit.
These ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies; therefore, the Bank may not be able to maintain these credit ratings. Negative ratings actions or negative guidance for the Bank, including as a consequence of U.S. debt levels, the U.S. fiscal budget process, orand other uncertainties may adversely affect the Bank’s cost of funds and ability to issue consolidated obligations or other financial instruments on acceptable terms, trigger additional collateral requirements under the Bank’s derivative contracts, and reduce the attractiveness of the Bank’s standby letters of credit. This could have a negative impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations, including the Bank’s ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.
Operational Risk
The financial models and the underlying assumptions used to value financial instruments and manage risk may differ materially from actual results.
The Bank makes significant use of business and financial models for managing risk. For example, the Bank uses models to measure and monitor exposures to various risks, including interest rate, prepayment, and other market risks, as well as credit risk. The Bank also uses models in determining the fair value of certain financial instruments when independent price quotations are not available or reliable. The degree of judgment in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. If market quotes are not available, fair values are based on discounted cash flows using market estimates of interest rates and volatility, dealer prices or prices of similar instruments. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions are based on the Bank’s best estimates for discount rates, prepayments, market volatility, and other factors. These assumptions may have a significant effect on the reported fair values of assets and liabilities, including derivatives, the related income and expense, and the expected future behavior of assets and liabilities.
While models used by the Bank to value instruments and measure risk exposures are subject to periodic validation by the Bank’s staff and independent parties, rapid changes in market conditions could impact the value of the Bank’s instruments, as well as the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. Models are inherently imperfect predictors of actual results because they are based on assumptions about future performance. Changes in any models or in any of the assumptions, judgments, or estimates used in the models may cause the results generated by the model to be materially different from actual results.
If the models are not reliable or the Bank does not use them appropriately, the Bank could make poor business decisions, including asset and liability management decisions, or other decisions, which could result in an adverse financial impact. Further, any strategies that the Bank employs to attempt to manage the risks associated with the use of models may not be effective.
The Bank relies heavily upon information systems and other technology. Any disruption or failure of the Bank’s information systems or other technology or those of critical vendors and third parties, such as the Federal Reserve Banks, could adversely impact the Bank’s business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Bank relies heavily upon information systems and other technology to conduct and manage its business. The Bank owns some of these systems and technology, and third parties own and provide to the Bank some of those systems and technology. The Bank’s information systems rely on certain critical vendors to provide technology solutions. Computer systems, software, and networks can be vulnerable to failures and interruptions, including as the result of any cyberattacks (e.g., breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code, and other events) or other breaches of technology security, that may derive from human error or malfeasance on the part of employees or third parties, other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, failure to implement key information technology initiatives, or accidental technological failure. At times, there may be an increased risk of cyberattacks as a result of geopolitical conflicts. These failures, interruptions, or cyberattacks could jeopardize the confidentiality or integrity of information, including personally identifiable information, result in fraudulent wire transfers, or otherwise interrupt the Bank’s ability to conduct and manage its business effectively, including, without limitation, its deposit account management, hedging activities, and advances activities. The Bank can make no assurance that it or its third-party vendors will be able to prevent, timely and adequately address, or mitigate the negative effects of any such failure, interruption, or cyberattack.
Like many financial institutions, the Bank has seen an increase in cyberattack attempts. For the Bank, these attempts have predominantly occurred through phishing, social engineering scams, and ransomware. The Bank’s operations rely on the availability and functioning of its main office and off-site backup facilities. The Bank devotes substantial resources and deploys preventative measures to secure the Bank’s systems, including firewalls, email security, and anti-virus solutions. These measures, or the Bank’s system redundancies and other continuity measures, may be ineffective or insufficient, and the Bank’s business continuity and disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. A failure or interruption in our business continuity, disaster recovery or certain information systems, or a cybersecurity event, could significantly harm the Bank’s reputation, its customer relations, risk management, and profitability, and could result in financial losses, legal and regulatory sanctions, increased costs, or other harm. While the Bank maintains insurance coverage that is intended to address certain aspects of data security risks, such insurance may be insufficient to cover all losses or types of claims that may arise. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the Bank may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance its layers of defense, to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities, or to comply with regulatory requirements.
Additionally, the Bank relies on the Office of Finance to facilitate the issuance and servicing of its consolidated obligations. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's operating systems as a result of breaches of technology security or cyberattacks could disrupt the Bank’s access to funds, and could significantly harm the Bank’s reputation, its customer relations, risk management, and profitability, and could result in financial losses, legal and regulatory sanctions, increased costs, or other harm.
The Bank’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, and risk management policies and procedures may be inadequate.
The Bank may fail to identify and manage risks related to a variety of aspects of its business, including operational risk, legal and compliance risk, interest-rate risk, liquidity risk, market risk, and credit risk. The Bank has adopted controls, procedures, policies, and systems to monitor and manage these risks. The Bank’s management cannot provide complete assurance that those controls, procedures, policies, and systems are adequate to identify and manage the risks inherent in the Bank’s business. In addition, because the Bank’s business continues to evolve, the Bank may fail to fully understand the implications of changes in the business, and therefore, it may fail to enhance the Bank’s risk governance framework to timely or adequately address those changes. Failed or inadequate controls and risk management practices could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
An economic downturn or natural disaster, including those resulting from climate change, in the Bank’s region could adversely affect the Bank’s profitability and financial condition.
Economic recession over a prolonged period or other unfavorable economic conditions in the Bank’s region (including on a state or local level) could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s business, including the demand for Bank products and services, and the value of the Bank’s collateral securing advances, investments, and mortgage loans held in portfolio. Moreover, adverse trends in employment levels, high inflation rates during a prolonged period which may significantly impact operational costs, geopolitical instability or conflicts (including the Russia and Ukraine war), trade disruptions, economic or other sanctions, or a sustained capital market correction could adversely affect overall economic conditions, and in turn result in adverse consequences in the Bank’s or its members’ businesses. If economic and market conditions deteriorate, the Bank’s financial condition, results of operation, ability to pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock could be adversely impacted.
Natural disasters, including those resulting from climate change, in the Bank’s region, could adversely affect the Bank’s operations, profitability and financial condition.
Portions of the Bank’s region also are subject to risks from hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, orwildfires and other natural disasters. The Bank’s region includes areas designated as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) which are deemed particularly vulnerable. Climate change contributes to the increasing unpredictability of major natural disasters, which could negatively affect the Bank’s ability to predict losses from such events.
These natural disasters including those resulting from climate change, could damage or dislocate the facilities or the underlying business of the Bank’s members, may damage or destroy collateral that members have pledged to secure advances or the mortgages the Bank holds for portfolio, create imbalances on insurance such as inadequate insurance, insurance shortfalls, premium increases, may impact to or the livelihood of borrowers of the Bank’s members, or otherwise could cause significant economic dislocation in the affected areas of the Bank’s region. Natural disasters could disrupt the Bank’s operations or the operations of third parties on which the Bank relies. Steps to address the risk of more frequent or severe weather events resulting from climate change could result in a potentially disruptive transition away from carbon-intense industries and create additional transitional risks and costs that include those to
adapt to new regulation to address climate change risks. Such a transition could negatively impact certain regions and regional economies, affecting the ability of borrowers in those industries or regions to pay their mortgage loans. Legal or regulatory responses to concerns about global climate change may lead to higher costs of compliance and increasing direct and indirect expenses and lending costs for the Bank’s members.
The loss of key personnel or difficulties recruiting and retaining qualified personnel, including as a result of executive compensation regulatory requirements, could adversely impact the Bank’s business and financial results.
The Bank relies on key personnel for many of its functions and has a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of its business. The Bank’s ability to attract and retain such personnel is important for it to conduct its operations and measure and maintain risk and financial controls. Additionally, the Bank must continue to recruit, retain and motivate a qualified and diverse pool of employees, both to maintain the Bank’s current business, including succession planning, and to execute its strategic initiatives. Like many organizations, the Bank has experienced increased competition in its recruitment and retention of employees. If the Bank is unable to recruit, retain and motivate such employees, its business and financial performance may be adversely affected.
Each FHLBank’s board of directors has the statutory authority and responsibility to select, employ and fix the compensation of its officers and employees in order to help ensure the hiring and retention of qualified staff. However, as the regulator of the FHLBanks, the Finance Agency has the authority to determine whether compensation paid to any executive officer is in its view not reasonable and comparable with compensation for employment in other similar businesses involving similar duties and responsibilities. Depending on how such authority is exercised, the Bank’s ability to hire and retain qualified executive officers could be adversely affected.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
The Bank owns approximately 235,514 square feet of office space at 1475 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The Bank occupies approximately 213,344220,017 square feet of this space and leases the remaining space to tenants. The Bank leases an off-site backup facilities comprising approximately 9,402 square feet for the Bank’s disaster recovery center.office space. The Bank also leases 2,993 square feet of office space located in Washington, D.C., which is shared with two other FHLBanks. The Bank’s management believes these facilities are well maintained and are adequate for the purposes for which they currently are used.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Bank ismay be subject to various legal proceedings and actions from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of those matters presently known to the Bank will have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
The Bank’s members own substantially all of the capital stock of the Bank. Former members and certain non-members, which own the Bank’s capital stock as a result of a merger or acquisition of the Bank’s member, own the remaining capital stock to support business transactions still carried on the Bank’s balance sheet. The Bank’s capital stock is not publicly traded or quoted, and there is no established marketplace for it, nor does the Bank expect a market to develop. The FHLBank Act and the Bank’s capital plan prohibit the trading of its capital stock, except in connection with merger or acquisition activity.
A member may request in writing that the Bank redeem its excess capital stock at par value. Excess capital stock is FHLBank capital stock not required to be held by the member to meet its minimum stock requirement under an FHLBank’s capital plan. Any such redemption request is subject to a five-year redemption period after the Bank receives the request, subject to certain regulatory requirements and to the satisfaction of any ongoing stock investment requirements applicable to the member. In addition, any member may withdraw from membership upon five years written notice to the Bank. Subject to the member’s satisfaction of any outstanding indebtedness and other statutory requirements, the Bank redeems the member’s capital stock at par value upon withdrawal from membership. The Bank, in its discretion, may repurchase shares held by a member in excess of its required stock holdings, subject to certain limitations and thresholds in the Bank’s capital plan. The par value of all capital stock is $100 per share, and the operating threshold for daily excess capital stock repurchases is $100 thousand. As of February 28, 2021,2023, the Bank had 828798 member and non-member shareholders and 3057 million shares of its capital stock outstanding (including mandatorily redeemable shares).
Finance Agency regulations prohibit any FHLBank from issuing dividends in the form of capital stock or otherwise issuing new excess capital stock if that FHLBank has excess capital stock greater than one percent of that FHLBank’s total assets or if issuing such dividends or new excess capital stock would cause that FHLBank to exceed the one percent excess capital stock limitation. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank’s excess capital stock did not exceed one percent of its total assets. Historically, the Bank has not issued dividends in the form of capital stock or issued new excess capital stock, and a member’s existing excess activity-based stock is applied to any activity-based stock requirements related to new advances.advances or standby letters of credit, as applicable.
Because only members, former members, and certain non-member institutions, not individuals, may own the Bank’s capital stock, the Bank has no equity compensation plans.
The Bank also issues standby letters of credit in the ordinary course of its business. From time to time, the Bank provides standby letters of credit to support members’ obligations, members’ standby letters of credit, or obligations issued to support unaffiliated, third-party offerings of notes, bonds, or other securities. The Bank issued $43.0$11.4 billion, $49.6$19.9 billion, and $39.2$43.0 billion in standby letters of credit in 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively. To the extent that these standby letters of credit are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, the issuance of the standby letter of credit by the Bank is exempt from registration pursuant to section 3(a)(2) thereof.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents selected historical financial data of the Bank and should be read in conjunction with the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements and related notes thereto and with Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included elsewhere in this Report. The following data, insofar as it relates to each of the years 2016 to 2020, have been derived from annual financial statements, including the statements of condition as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the related statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report. The financial information presented in the following table and in the financial statements included in this Report is not necessarily indicative of the financial condition or results of operations of any other interim or annual periods (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of or for the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Statements of Condition (as of year end) | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 92,295 | | | $ | 149,857 | | | $ | 154,476 | | | $ | 146,566 | | | $ | 138,671 | |
| Advances | 52,168 | | | 97,167 | | | 108,462 | | | 102,440 | | | 99,077 | |
Investments (1) | 36,380 | | | 50,617 | | | 44,309 | | | 40,378 | | | 36,510 | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 218 | | | 296 | | | 360 | | | 435 | | | 523 | |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | (1) | | | (1) | | | (1) | | | (1) | | | (1) | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | 1,998 | | | 1,492 | | | 1,176 | | | 1,177 | | | 1,118 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | |
Discount notes (2) | 25,385 | | | 52,134 | | | 66,025 | | | 50,139 | | | 41,292 | |
Bonds (2) | 59,379 | | | 88,503 | | | 79,114 | | | 87,523 | | | 88,647 | |
Total consolidated obligations, net (2) | 84,764 | | | 140,637 | | | 145,139 | | | 137,662 | | | 129,939 | |
| Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| Affordable Housing Program payable | 82 | | | 89 | | | 85 | | | 77 | | | 69 | |
| Capital stock - putable | 3,078 | | | 4,988 | | | 5,486 | | | 5,154 | | | 4,955 | |
| Retained earnings | 2,198 | | | 2,153 | | | 2,110 | | | 2,003 | | | 1,892 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (16) | | | 22 | | | 51 | | | 110 | | | 104 | |
| Total capital | 5,260 | | | 7,163 | | | 7,647 | | | 7,267 | | | 6,951 | |
| Statements of Income (for the year ended) | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (3) | 333 | | | 535 | | | 561 | | | 157 | | | 334 | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
| Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | — | | | (13) | | | (3) | | | (2) | | | (3) | |
| Net gains (losses) on trading securities | 4 | | | 3 | | | (1) | | | (5) | | | (30) | |
| Net realized gains from sale of investment securities | 85 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities | (6) | | | (4) | | | 29 | | | 341 | | | 119 | |
| Standby letters of credit fees | 19 | | | 24 | | | 25 | | | 26 | | | 28 | |
Other income (4) | 11 | | | 9 | | | 1 | | | 7 | | | (3) | |
| Noninterest expense | 163 | | | 146 | | | 150 | | | 136 | | | 137 | |
| Income before assessment | 283 | | | 408 | | | 462 | | | 388 | | | 309 | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 28 | | | 41 | | | 46 | | | 39 | | | 31 | |
| Net income | 255 | | | 367 | | | 416 | | | 349 | | | 278 | |
| Performance Ratios (%) | | | | | | | | | |
Return on equity (5) | 3.95 | | | 5.09 | | | 5.54 | | | 4.97 | | | 4.08 | |
Return on assets (6) | 0.19 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.27 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.20 | |
Net interest margin (7) | 0.26 | | | 0.36 | | | 0.37 | | | 0.11 | | | 0.24 | |
Regulatory capital ratio (as of year end) (8) | 5.72 | | | 4.77 | | | 4.92 | | | 4.88 | | | 4.94 | |
Equity to assets ratio (9) | 4.90 | | | 4.85 | | | 4.93 | | | 4.97 | | | 4.88 | |
Dividend payout ratio (10) | 93.86 | | | 88.25 | | | 74.12 | | | 68.40 | | | 81.08 | |
____________
(1) Investments consist of interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold, and securities classified as trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity.
(2) The amounts presented are the Bank’s primary obligations on consolidated obligations outstanding. The par value of the other FHLBanks’ outstanding consolidated obligations for which the Bank is jointly and severally liable was as follows (in millions):
| | | | | |
December 31, 2020 | $ | 662,051 | |
December 31, 2019 | 885,114 | |
December 31, 2018 | 886,081 | |
December 31, 2017 | 896,441 | |
December 31, 2016 | 859,361 | |
(3) The Bank adopted new accounting guidance related to derivatives and hedging activities effective January 1, 2019. The impact of this guidance changed the presentation of net interest income as described in Note 15—Derivatives and Hedging Activities to the Bank’s audited financial statements.
(4) Other income includes service fees and other items. For the year ended December 31, 2016, amount includes a $6 million loss on litigation settlements, net.
(5) Calculated as net income, divided by average total equity.
(6) Calculated as net income, divided by average total assets.
(7) Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
(8) Regulatory capital ratio is regulatory capital, which does not include accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as a percentage of total assets as of year end.
(9) Calculated as average total equity, divided by average total assets.
(10) Calculated as dividends declared during the year, divided by net income during the year.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis relates to the Bank’s financial condition as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. This section explains the changes in certain key items in the Bank’s financial statements from year to year, the primary factors driving those changes, the Bank’s risk management processes and results, known trends or uncertainties that the Bank believes may have a material effect on the Bank’s future performance, as well as how certain accounting principles affect the Bank’s financial statements. For a discussion on the comparison between the results of operations for the years ended 20192021 and 2018,2020, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are contained in the Bank’s 20192021 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020.3, 2022.
Executive Summary
Recent Market Conditions
The Bank’s overall results of operations are influenced by the economy and the financial markets. In particular, market conditions impact members’ demand for advances, and the Bank’s ability to maintain sufficient access to sources of funding at favorable costs. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted
Throughout 2022 and continuing into 2023, the financial markets throughout 2020. In light of these market conditions, the FOMC lowered and maintainedFederal Reserve Open Markets Committee (FOMC) raised the target range for the federal funds rate as part of 0.00the FOMC’s efforts to manage inflation. Most recently, on February 1, 2023, the FOMC raised the target range for the federal funds rate to 4.50 percent to 0.254.75 percent after taking into consideration recent economic indicators including the following: modest growth in spending and market interest ratesproduction, job gains in recent months, low unemployment rate, the continued at historically low levels. Additionally,global uncertainty caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine, and continued elevated inflation. The FOMC also announced it would continue to reduce holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency MBS, according to previously announced plans. These initiatives are consistent with the Federal Reserve continuedFOMC’s commitment to return inflation to its emergency actions, initiated in March 2020, to help facilitate liquidity and support stability in the capital markets. In particular, the Federal Reserve has continued to increase its provision of liquidity to the repurchase agreements and U.S. Treasury markets through open market operations. Additional fiscal stimulus through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and other measures has also led to increased liquidity and deposit levels at the Bank’s member institutions. As discussed below, these actions and market conditions reduced demand for the Bank’s advances during 2020. The Bank continued to meet its funding needs through December 31, 2020.2.00 percent objective.
Operating Status Update
As a financial institution,Even though the Bank is part of the nation’s critical infrastructure, has continually operated its business, and has continued to serve as a reliable source of funding for its members. The Bank continues to operate in Phase 2 of its return to office plan, pursuant to which approximately 25 percent of the Bank’s employees are working on-site. To date, the Bank has not experienced significant operational difficulties or disruptions, however the possibility exists, which could impair the Bank’s
ability to conduct and manage its business effectively. To date, no member of the Bank’s executive management team has been incapacitated or unable to perform duties. The Bank’s board of directors regularly reviews the Bank’s succession plan in the event of incapacitation of any executive team member.
Financial Condition
As of December 31, 2020, total assets were $92.3 billion, a decrease of $57.6 billion, or 38.4 percent, from December 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a $45.0 billion, or 46.3 percent, decrease in advances. Decreased demand for liquidity from the Bank’s members, caused by increased member deposits were the primary drivers of the decrease in advance balances.
As of December 31, 2020, total liabilities were $87.0 billion, a decrease of $55.7 billion, or 39.0 percent, from December 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a $55.9 billion, or 39.7 percent, decrease in consolidated obligations. Consolidated obligations are the principal funding source used by the Bank and the decrease in funding was driven by the decrease in advance demand.
As of December 31, 2020, total capital was $5.3 billion, a decrease of $1.9 billion, or 26.6 percent, from December 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the Bank’s subclass B2 activity-based capital stock resulting from a decrease in the total outstanding advances during the year.
Results of Operations
Net interest income was $333 million for 2020, a decrease of $202 million, or 37.8 percent, from net interest income of $535 million for 2019. During 2020, market interest rates declined significantly and have remained at historically low levels and the low market interest rates impacted the Bank’s income on interest-earning assets resulting in lower net interest income. Further, the additional market liquidity from the monetary and fiscal stimulus actions resulted in lower demand from the Bank’s members for advances.
The Bank recorded net income of $255 million for 2020, a decrease of $112 million, or 30.5 percent, from net income of $367 million for 2019. The decrease in net income was primarily due to lower net interest income, as described above. In addition, during 2020 the Bank made an additional voluntary $20 million retirement plan contribution which reduced net income. The decrease in net income was partially offset by an $85 million gain from the sale of the Bank’s private-label MBS investment portfolio during the first quarter of 2020.
One way in which the Bank analyzes its performance is by comparing its annualized return on equity (ROE) to three-month average LIBOR. The Bank has chosen to measure ROE as a spread to average three-month LIBOR because the Bank has significant assets and liabilities priced to average three-month LIBOR. The Bank’s ROE was 3.95 percent for 2020, compared to 5.09 percent for 2019. The decrease in ROE was primarily due to the decrease in net income during the year. ROE spread to average three-month LIBOR was 330 basis points for 2020, compared to 276 basis points for 2019. The increase in the ROE spread to three-month average LIBOR was primarily due to a decrease in three-month average LIBOR during 2020 compared to 2019. The Bank is currently planning for the eventual replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including the probability of SOFR as the dominant replacement. For comparative purposes, the Bank’s ROE spread to average SOFR was 359 basis points for 2020. Beginning in 2021, the Bank will begin using ROE spread to average SOFR in this analysis and cease using a LIBOR-based performance metric.
The Bank’s interest-rate spread was 22 basis points for 2020, compared to 25 basis points for 2019. The decrease in the Bank’s interest-rate spread was primarily due to the decrease in market interest rates which impacted interest income related to interest-earning assets more than the offsetting interest expense related to interest-bearing liabilities.
Business Outlook
The Bank’s business model is focused on enhancing the total value of the cooperative for its members by serving as their trusted advisor. The Bank focuses these efforts on offering readily available, competitively priced advances, a potential return on investment, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services. As part of the Bank’s cooperative structure, the Bank has chosen to operateoperates with narrow margins, passing on its low funding costs to members, which causes the Bank’s profitability to be sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The state of the economy is a significant component in determining the Bank’s overall business outlook as it impacts advance demand, asset and collateral values, member financial stability, funding costs, and many other facets of the Bank’s portfolio. External factors such as liquidity levels at member institutions, fiscal and monetary policies, performance of global economies, and regulatory changes could have a significant effect either positive or negative on the Bank’s financial performance.
Interest rates are also a significant factor on the Bank’s business outlook. As discussed throughout this Report, the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates during 2020 to historic lows. Changes in interest rates can impact the Bank’s interest rate risk management, profitability, and ROE. It can also impact member advance demand, as rate uncertainty can impact deposit levels at the Bank’s members.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and is expected to continue to influence these external factors and the financial markets. As discussed throughout this Report, the Federal Reserve has undertaken a number of emergency actions to increase market liquidity, which along withrecent market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in substantially higher deposit levels at member institutions. These higher deposit levels reduced member demand for new advances and gave rise to prepayments of existing advances, resulting in a significantly lowerhave favorably impacted profitability as advance balance as of December 31, 2020.The Bank expects that the current low market interest rate environment, as well as decreased advance demand, will continue into the foreseeable future, which reduced the Bank’s net income in 2020 and is expected to reduce the Bank’s net income for 2021. If the Bank experiences these lower levels of net income, the amount that the Bank pays as dividends could be impacted.
The Bank relies on access to the capital markets to meet its funding needs, and the Bank expects continued sufficient access to capital markets. Given the evolving and unknowable effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on these external factors, the Bank cannot predict the extent to which, and the duration of, the impact to the Bank’s future business performance and profitability due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A more detailed discussion of the risks to the Bank associated with the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed in Item 1A—Risk Factors.
Merger activity involving the Bank’s members can impact the Bank’s business outlook. As the financial industry continues to experience consolidation, our membership base may decrease, and our advance balance and other business could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the size of the financial institutions involved in the merger. While the Bank’s balance sheet is designed to expand and contract based upon advance demand, the Bank’s business could be affected by this merger activity, including as a result of a single event, such as the loss of a member’s business due to acquisition by a non-member.
Management continues to be focused and engaged on implementing an effective transition away from LIBOR. Many of the Bank’s assets and liabilities, and its derivative transactions, were historically indexed to LIBOR. There are complexities, risks and uncertainties involved with transitioning to alternative rates, and the transition involves considerable time and resources, all of which can impact the Bank’s business outlook.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the Bank’s total assets, total liabilities, and total capital as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | Change |
| 2022 | | | | 2021 | | | | Amount | | Percent |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | | | $ | 78,746 | | | | | $ | 72,876 | | | 92.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | 143,976 | | | | | 74,151 | | | | | 69,825 | | | 94.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total capital | 7,646 | | | | | 4,595 | | | | | 3,051 | | | 66.41 | |
•Total assets increased primarily due to a $64.2 billion, or 141.3 percent, increase in total advances, and a $9.1 billion, or 28.5 percent, increase in total investments. Increased demand for liquidity from the Bank’s members was the primary driver of the increase in advance balances.
•Total liabilities increased primarily due to a $69.8 billion, or 97.4 percent, increase in consolidated obligations as a result of increased funding and liquidity needs during the year.
•The increase in capital stock was primarily due to the increase in advances which resulted in an increase in activity based stock, as well as an increase to the minimum stock requirement factor from 3.75 percent to 4.25 percent for activity-based stock related to member’s outstanding par value of advances.
Results of Operations
The following table presents the Bank’s significant income items for the years presented and provides information regarding the changes during those years (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Change |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net interest income | $ | 327 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 333 | | | $ | 46 | | | 16.17 | | | $ | (52) | | | (15.51) | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | 1 | | | 65.16 | | | (1) | | | 27.30 | |
| Noninterest income | 16 | | | 15 | | | 113 | | | 1 | | | 10.51 | | | (98) | | | (86.68) | |
| Noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | | | (11) | | | (6.86) | | | (14) | | | (9.01) | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | | | 6 | | | 38.55 | | | (13) | | | (47.73) | |
| Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | 51 | | | 38.54 | | | $ | (122) | | | (47.73) | |
•Net interest income included $2 million and $59 million of advance prepayment fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
•After considering the impact of the decrease in advance prepayment fees, net interest income was favorably impacted by an increase in advance balances, partially offset by an increase in interest rates which impacted interest bearing-liabilities more than the increase in interest-earning assets.
•Average advance balances were $75.8 billion for 2022, compared to $47.9 billion for 2021.
The following table presents the Bank’s significant income ratios for the years presented. These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| | | | | | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| Return on average equity (ROE) | | | | | | | | 3.18 | % | | 2.79 | % | | 3.95 | % | | 0.39 | % | | (1.16) | % |
| Average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.64 | | | 0.04 | | | 0.36 | | | 1.60 | | | (0.32) | |
| ROE spread to average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.54 | | | 2.75 | | | 3.59 | | | (1.21) | | | (0.84) | |
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | | | | 0.16 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.22 | | | (0.18) | | | 0.12 | |
•The increase in ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to the increase in net income.
•The ROE spread to average daily SOFR for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, was impacted by the explanations provided above related to changes in ROE, offset by an increase in average daily SOFR.
•The decrease in the Bank’s interest-rate spread for the years ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to increases in interest rates that impacted the expense from interest-bearing liabilities more than the income from interest-earning assets and the decrease in advance prepayment fees.
Business Outlook
The Bank’s business model is focused on enhancing the total value of the cooperative for its members by serving as their trusted advisor. The Bank focuses these efforts on offering readily available, competitively priced advances, a potential return on investment, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services. As part of the Bank’s cooperative structure, the Bank has chosen to operate with narrow margins, passing on its low funding costs to members, which causes the Bank’s profitability to be sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The state of the economy is a significant component in determining the Bank’s overall business outlook as it impacts advance demand, asset and collateral values, member financial stability, funding costs, and many other facets of the Bank’s portfolio. External factors such as liquidity levels at member institutions, fiscal and monetary policies, performance of global economies, and regulatory changes could have a significant effect either positive or negative on the Bank’s financial performance.
Interest rates are also a significant factor on the Bank’s business outlook. Changes in interest rates can impact the Bank’s interest rate risk management, profitability, and ROE. It can also impact member advance demand, as rate uncertainty can impact deposit levels at the Bank’s members.
The COVID-19 pandemic, along with the governmental and public action in response to the pandemic, created uncertainty and disruptions in the overall economic environment. The government and the FOMC’s measures aimed at increasing market liquidity contributed to a significant decrease in advance demand from Bank’s members during the initial years of the pandemic until early 2022. More recently, global uncertainty caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, and increased inflation rates in the United States continue to generate uncertainty as to the pace of the economic recovery in the near future. New FOMC measures beginning in 2022 have been targeting a reduction in market liquidity to manage inflation. This reduction in overall market liquidity has resulted in an increased demand for the Bank’s advances.
Merger activity involving the Bank’s members can impact the Bank’s business outlook. As the financial industry continues to experience consolidation, our membership base may decrease, and our advance balance and other business could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the size of the financial institutions involved in the merger. While the Bank’s balance sheet is designed to expand and contract based upon advance demand, the Bank’s business could be affected by this merger activity, including as a result of a single event, such as the loss of a member’s business due to acquisition by a non-member.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the distribution of the Bank’s total assets, liabilities, and capital by major class as of the dates indicated (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | As of December 31, | | | As of December 31, | |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | Increase (Decrease) | | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Advances | Advances | $ | 52,168 | | | 56.52 | | | $ | 97,167 | | | 64.84 | | | $ | (44,999) | | | (46.31) | | Advances | $ | 109,595 | | | 72.28 | | | $ | 45,415 | | | 57.67 | | | $ | 64,180 | | | 141.32 | |
| Investment securities | Investment securities | 21,966 | | | 23.80 | | | 28,181 | | | 18.81 | | | (6,215) | | | (22.05) | | Investment securities | 25,339 | | | 16.71 | | | 17,713 | | | 22.49 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Other investments | Other investments | 14,414 | | | 15.62 | | | 22,436 | | | 14.97 | | | (8,022) | | | (35.76) | | Other investments | 15,563 | | | 10.27 | | | 14,108 | | | 17.92 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Mortgage loans, net | Mortgage loans, net | 218 | | | 0.24 | | | 296 | | | 0.20 | | | (78) | | | (26.33) | | Mortgage loans, net | 120 | | | 0.08 | | | 149 | | | 0.19 | | | (29) | | | (19.63) | |
| | Other assets | Other assets | 3,529 | | | 3.82 | | | 1,777 | | | 1.18 | | | 1,752 | | | 98.63 | | Other assets | 1,005 | | | 0.66 | | | 1,361 | | | 1.73 | | | (356) | | | (26.21) | |
| Total assets | Total assets | $ | 92,295 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 149,857 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | (57,562) | | | (38.41) | | Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 78,746 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 72,876 | | | 92.55 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | $ | 25,385 | | | 29.17 | | | $ | 52,134 | | | 36.53 | | | $ | (26,749) | | | (51.31) | | Discount notes | $ | 39,781 | | | 27.63 | | | $ | 25,506 | | | 34.40 | | | $ | 14,275 | | | 55.97 | |
| Bonds | Bonds | 59,379 | | | 68.22 | | | 88,503 | | | 62.02 | | | (29,124) | | | (32.91) | | Bonds | 101,729 | | | 70.66 | | | 46,186 | | | 62.29 | | | 55,543 | | | 120.26 | |
| Deposits | Deposits | 1,998 | | | 2.30 | | | 1,492 | | | 1.05 | | | 506 | | | 33.85 | | Deposits | 1,821 | | | 1.26 | | | 2,054 | | | 2.77 | | | (233) | | | (11.34) | |
| Other liabilities | Other liabilities | 273 | | | 0.31 | | | 565 | | | 0.40 | | | (292) | | | (51.53) | | Other liabilities | 645 | | | 0.45 | | | 405 | | | 0.54 | | | 240 | | | 59.37 | |
| Total liabilities | Total liabilities | $ | 87,035 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 142,694 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | (55,659) | | | (39.01) | | Total liabilities | $ | 143,976 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 74,151 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 69,825 | | | 94.17 | |
| Capital stock | Capital stock | $ | 3,078 | | | 58.53 | | | $ | 4,988 | | | 69.63 | | | $ | (1,910) | | | (38.28) | | Capital stock | $ | 5,397 | | | 70.58 | | | $ | 2,383 | | | 51.85 | | | $ | 3,014 | | | 126.51 | |
| Retained earnings | Retained earnings | 2,198 | | | 41.79 | | | 2,153 | | | 30.06 | | | 45 | | | 2.06 | | Retained earnings | 2,283 | | | 29.86 | | | 2,228 | | | 48.49 | | | 55 | | | 2.47 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (16) | | | (0.32) | | | 22 | | | 0.31 | | | (38) | | | (176.27) | | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (34) | | | (0.44) | | | (16) | | | (0.34) | | | (18) | | | 114.55 | |
| Total capital | Total capital | $ | 5,260 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 7,163 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | (1,903) | | | (26.57) | | Total capital | $ | 7,646 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 4,595 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 3,051 | | | 66.41 | |
Advances
The following table presents the Bank’s advances outstanding by year of maturity and the related weighted-average interest rate (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) |
| | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 23,326 | | | 0.48 | | | $ | 64,413 | | | 1.90 | |
| Due after one year through two years | 3,803 | | | 1.80 | | | 7,421 | | | 2.21 | |
| Due after two years through three years | 3,347 | | | 2.03 | | | 5,420 | | | 2.36 | |
| Due after three years through four years | 2,643 | | | 1.93 | | | 3,382 | | | 2.72 | |
| Due after four years through five years | 3,657 | | | 1.80 | | | 4,778 | | | 2.44 | |
| Due after five years | 13,867 | | | 2.12 | | | 11,042 | | | 2.61 | |
| Total par value | 50,643 | | | 1.30 | | | 96,456 | | | 2.09 | |
| Deferred prepayment fees | (55) | | | | | (9) | | | |
| Discount on AHP advances | (3) | | | | | (3) | | | |
Discount on EDGE (1) advances | (1) | | | | | (2) | | | |
| Hedging adjustments | 1,584 | | | | | 725 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 52,168 | | | | | $ | 97,167 | | | |
____________
(1) Economic Development and Growth Enhancement Program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) |
| | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 78,134 | | | 4.35 | | | $ | 21,819 | | | 0.29 | |
| Due after one year through two years | 12,981 | | | 4.25 | | | 3,247 | | | 1.20 | |
| Due after two years through three years | 7,982 | | | 3.79 | | | 2,236 | | | 1.83 | |
| Due after three years through four years | 4,033 | | | 3.86 | | | 3,145 | | | 1.51 | |
| Due after four years through five years | 2,427 | | | 3.31 | | | 3,047 | | | 2.21 | |
| Due after five years through 15 years | 4,750 | | | 3.07 | | | 10,920 | | | 1.65 | |
| Thereafter | 2 | | | 2.47 | | | 513 | | | 3.39 | |
| Total par value | 110,309 | | | 4.20 | | | 44,927 | | | 1.02 | |
| Deferred prepayment fees | 3 | | | | | (70) | | | |
| Discounts | (2) | | | | | (3) | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Hedging adjustments | (715) | | | | | 561 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 109,595 | | | | | $ | 45,415 | | | |
Total advances decreasedincreased by 46.3141.3 percent as of December 31, 2020,2022, compared to December 31, 2019. In response to the deteriorating market conditions in early 2020, the Federal Reserve implemented a number of asset purchase programs to provide additional liquidity to the financial markets. The additional market liquidity from monetary and fiscal stimulus actions resulted in increased deposits at the Bank’s members and lower demand for the Bank’s advances. The Bank expects that advance demand will continue at reduced levels.2021. A significant percentage of advances madeoriginated during 20202022 were short-term advances.
As of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, 78.82021, 45.5 percent and 64.678.1 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s advances were fixed rate. However, the Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of advances to convert the rates, in effect,
into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on LIBOR and SOFR. As of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, 63.22021, 34.5 percent and 46.759.6 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s fixed-rate advances were swapped, and 0.38 percent and 2.03 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s variable-rate advances, which contained optionality, were swapped. The majority of the Bank’s variable-rate advances were indexed to LIBORSOFR and SOFR. Beginning June 30, 2020, the Bank ceased issuing LIBOR-based advances and entering into LIBOR-based derivatives with maturities/termination dates beyond December 31, 2021.OIS. The Bank also offers variable-rate advances that may be tied to indices such as the federal funds rate, prime rate, or constant maturity swap rates.
The Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions had 71.668.4 percent of the Bank’s total advances outstanding as of December 31, 2020.2022. Further information regarding the Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions and breakdown of their individual advance balances as of December 31, 20202022 is contained in Item 1. Business—Credit Products—Advances.Advances. Management believes that the Bank holds sufficient collateral, on a member-specific basis, to secure the advances to all borrowers, including these 10 institutions, and the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.
Supplementary financial data on the Bank’s advances is set forth under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Information (Unaudited).
Investments
The following table presents more detailed information regarding investments held by the Bank (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | Amount | | Percent |
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | $ | 2,307 | | | $ | 4,556 | | | $ | (2,249) | | | (49.36) | |
| U. S. Treasury obligations | 1,500 | | | 1,499 | | | 1 | | | 0.07 | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | 295 | | | 89 | | | 206 | | | 232.43 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 7,283 | | | 8,642 | | | (1,359) | | | (15.73) | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 10,580 | | | 12,518 | | | (1,938) | | | (15.48) | |
| Private-label residential | — | | | 876 | | | (876) | | | (100.00) | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | 18,158 | | | 22,125 | | | (3,967) | | | (17.93) | |
| Total investment securities | 21,966 | | | 28,181 | | | (6,215) | | | (22.05) | |
| Other investments: | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits (1) | 1,644 | | | 3,810 | | | (2,166) | | | (56.85) | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 9,500 | | | 8,800 | | | 700 | | | 7.95 | |
Federal funds sold (2) | 3,270 | | | 9,826 | | | (6,556) | | | (66.72) | |
| Total other investments | 14,414 | | | 22,436 | | | (8,022) | | | (35.76) | |
| Total investments | $ | 36,380 | | | $ | 50,617 | | | $ | (14,237) | | | (28.13) | |
____________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| | Due in one year or less | | Due after one year through five years | | Due after five through 10 years | | Due after 10 years | | Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U. S. Treasury obligations | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | 98 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,713 | | | $ | 2,639 | | | $ | 74 | | | 2.81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 75 | | | 1,415 | | | 60 | | | — | | | 1,550 | | | 1,450 | | | 100 | | | 6.90 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 255 | | | 257 | | | 221 | | | 36 | | | 16.57 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 1 | | | 25 | | | 152 | | | 5,326 | | | 5,504 | | | 4,927 | | | 577 | | | 11.70 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 10 | | | 2,699 | | | 11,988 | | | 617 | | | 15,314 | | | 8,475 | | | 6,839 | | | 80.70 | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | 11 | | | 2,725 | | | 12,141 | | | 6,198 | | | 21,075 | | | 13,623 | | | 7,452 | | | 54.71 | |
| Total held-to-maturity securities | 86 | | | 4,141 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 22,626 | | | 15,074 | | | 7,552 | | | 50.10 | |
| Total investment securities | 2,701 | | | 4,239 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 25,339 | | | 17,713 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | 1,277 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,277 | | | 688 | | | 589 | | | 85.43 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,250 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,250 | | | 7,000 | | | (750) | | | (10.71) | |
Federal funds sold (1) | 8,036 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8,036 | | | 6,420 | | | 1,616 | | | 25.17 | |
| Total other investments | 15,563 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15,563 | | | 14,108 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Total investments | $ | 18,264 | | | $ | 4,239 | | | $ | 12,201 | | | $ | 6,198 | | | $ | 40,902 | | | $ | 31,821 | | | $ | 9,081 | | | 28.54 | |
Weighted-average yields on (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities | 1.89 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | 4.57 | % | | 2.96 | % | | 4.29 | % | | 4.19 | % | | | | | | | | |
_________ (1)Interest-bearing deposits includes a $431 million and $508 million business money market account with Truist Bank one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(2)Federal funds sold includes $180$190 million and $100$199 million with BankUnited, National Association, one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
The decrease inweighted average yields on available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities are calculated as the sum of each debt security using the period- end balances multiplied by the coupon rate adjusted by the impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, divided by the total investmentdebt securities was primarily due to the maturities and prepayments that occurred during 2020 and the sale of the Bank’s private-label residential mortgage backed securities portfolio which occurred in the first quarter of 2020. The amount held in other investments will vary each day based on the Bank’s liquidity needs as a result of advances demand, the earnings rates,applicable available-for-sale securities and the availability of high quality counterparties in the federal funds market.held-to-maturity securities portfolio.
The Finance Agency regulations prohibit an FHLBank from purchasing MBS and asset-backed securities if its investment in such securities would exceed 300 percent of the FHLBank’s previous month-end regulatory capital on the day it would purchase the securities. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, these investments were 344 percent and 309 percent of the Bank’s regulatory capital, respectively. These investments exceeded the 300 percent level due to a decrease in regulatory capital that resulted from a decrease in advances as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Bank was in compliance with this regulatory requirement at the time of its MBS purchases and was not required to sell any previously purchased MBS. However, the Bank is precluded from purchasing additional MBS until its MBS to regulatory capital declines below 300 percent.
Refer to Note 6—Available-for-sale Securities and Note 7—Held-to-maturity Securities to the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements for information on securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021, as these investments were 274 percent and 295 percent of the Bank’s regulatory capital, respectively. The increase in MBS as of
December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was due to an increase in regulatory capital which increased the Bank’s capacity to invest in MBS.
The amount held in other investments varies each day based on the Bank’s liquidity needs as a result of advances demand, the earnings rates, and the availability of high-quality counterparties in the federal funds market. The increase in other investments as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, is primarily due to the need to fund increased advance demand.
Mortgage Loans Held for PortfolioResults of Operations
The decrease in mortgage loans held for portfolio from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the maturity and prepayments of these assets during the year.
Members that sold mortgage loans to the Bank were located primarily in the southeastern United States; therefore, the Bank’s conventional mortgage loan portfolio was concentrated in that region as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The following table presents the percentage of unpaid principal balance of conventional residential mortgage loans held for portfolioBank’s significant income items for the five largest state concentrations.years presented and provides information regarding the changes during those years (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Change |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net interest income | $ | 327 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 333 | | | $ | 46 | | | 16.17 | | | $ | (52) | | | (15.51) | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | 1 | | | 65.16 | | | (1) | | | 27.30 | |
| Noninterest income | 16 | | | 15 | | | 113 | | | 1 | | | 10.51 | | | (98) | | | (86.68) | |
| Noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | | | (11) | | | (6.86) | | | (14) | | | (9.01) | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | | | 6 | | | 38.55 | | | (13) | | | (47.73) | |
| Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | 51 | | | 38.54 | | | $ | (122) | | | (47.73) | |
•Net interest income included $2 million and $59 million of advance prepayment fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Percent of Total | | Percent of Total |
| Florida | 22.98 | | | 22.36 | |
| South Carolina | 21.74 | | | 20.47 | |
| Virginia | 10.68 | | | 11.61 | |
| Georgia | 10.33 | | | 9.96 | |
| North Carolina | 8.33 | | | 8.13 | |
| All other | 25.94 | | | 27.47 | |
| Total | 100.00 | | | 100.00 | |
Supplementary financial data on•Average advance balances were $75.8 billion for 2022, compared to $47.9 billion for 2021.
The following table presents the Bank’s mortgage loans is set forth under Item 8, Financial Statementssignificant income ratios for the years presented. These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| | | | | | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| Return on average equity (ROE) | | | | | | | | 3.18 | % | | 2.79 | % | | 3.95 | % | | 0.39 | % | | (1.16) | % |
| Average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.64 | | | 0.04 | | | 0.36 | | | 1.60 | | | (0.32) | |
| ROE spread to average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.54 | | | 2.75 | | | 3.59 | | | (1.21) | | | (0.84) | |
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | | | | 0.16 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.22 | | | (0.18) | | | 0.12 | |
•The increase in ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to the increase in net income.
•The ROE spread to average daily SOFR for the years ended December 31, 2022 and Supplementary Data—Supplementary Financial Information (Unaudited).2021, was impacted by the explanations provided above related to changes in ROE, offset by an increase in average daily SOFR.
•The decrease in the Bank’s interest-rate spread for the years ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to increases in interest rates that impacted the expense from interest-bearing liabilities more than the income from interest-earning assets and the decrease in advance prepayment fees.
Consolidated ObligationsBusiness Outlook
The Bank’s business model is focused on enhancing the total value of the cooperative for its members by serving as their trusted advisor. The Bank fundsfocuses these efforts on offering readily available, competitively priced advances, a potential return on investment, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services. As part of the Bank’s cooperative structure, the Bank has chosen to operate with narrow margins, passing on its assets primarily throughlow funding costs to members, which causes the issuanceBank’s profitability to be sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The state of consolidated obligation bondsthe economy is a significant component in determining the Bank’s overall business outlook as it impacts advance demand, asset and consolidated obligation discount notes. collateral values, member financial stability, funding costs, and many other facets of the Bank’s portfolio. External factors such as liquidity levels at member institutions, fiscal and monetary policies, performance of global economies, and regulatory changes could have a significant effect either positive or negative on the Bank’s financial performance.
Interest rates are also a significant factor on the Bank’s business outlook. Changes in interest rates can impact the Bank’s interest rate risk management, profitability, and ROE. It can also impact member advance demand, as rate uncertainty can impact deposit levels at the Bank’s members.
The COVID-19 pandemic, along with the governmental and public action in response to the pandemic, created uncertainty and disruptions in the overall economic environment. The government and the FOMC’s measures aimed at increasing market liquidity contributed to a significant decrease in consolidated obligationsadvance demand from December 31, 2019Bank’s members during the initial years of the pandemic until early 2022. More recently, global uncertainty caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, and increased inflation rates in the United States continue to December 31, 2020 was primarilygenerate uncertainty as to the pace of the economic recovery in the near future. New FOMC measures beginning in 2022 have been targeting a reduction in market liquidity to manage inflation. This reduction in overall market liquidity has resulted in an increased demand for the Bank’s advances.
Merger activity involving the Bank’s members can impact the Bank’s business outlook. As the financial industry continues to experience consolidation, our membership base may decrease, and our advance balance and other business could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the size of the financial institutions involved in the merger. While the Bank’s balance sheet is designed to expand and contract based upon advance demand, the Bank’s business could be affected by this merger activity, including as a result of a single event, such as the decreaseloss of a member’s business due to acquisition by a non-member.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the distribution of the Bank’s total assets, liabilities, and capital by major class as of the dates indicated (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, | | | | |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Advances | $ | 109,595 | | | 72.28 | | | $ | 45,415 | | | 57.67 | | | $ | 64,180 | | | 141.32 | |
| Investment securities | 25,339 | | | 16.71 | | | 17,713 | | | 22.49 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Other investments | 15,563 | | | 10.27 | | | 14,108 | | | 17.92 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Mortgage loans, net | 120 | | | 0.08 | | | 149 | | | 0.19 | | | (29) | | | (19.63) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | 1,005 | | | 0.66 | | | 1,361 | | | 1.73 | | | (356) | | | (26.21) | |
| Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 78,746 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 72,876 | | | 92.55 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount notes | $ | 39,781 | | | 27.63 | | | $ | 25,506 | | | 34.40 | | | $ | 14,275 | | | 55.97 | |
| Bonds | 101,729 | | | 70.66 | | | 46,186 | | | 62.29 | | | 55,543 | | | 120.26 | |
| Deposits | 1,821 | | | 1.26 | | | 2,054 | | | 2.77 | | | (233) | | | (11.34) | |
| Other liabilities | 645 | | | 0.45 | | | 405 | | | 0.54 | | | 240 | | | 59.37 | |
| Total liabilities | $ | 143,976 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 74,151 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 69,825 | | | 94.17 | |
| Capital stock | $ | 5,397 | | | 70.58 | | | $ | 2,383 | | | 51.85 | | | $ | 3,014 | | | 126.51 | |
| Retained earnings | 2,283 | | | 29.86 | | | 2,228 | | | 48.49 | | | 55 | | | 2.47 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (34) | | | (0.44) | | | (16) | | | (0.34) | | | (18) | | | 114.55 | |
| Total capital | $ | 7,646 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 4,595 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 3,051 | | | 66.41 | |
Advances
The following table presents the Bank’s advances outstanding duringby year of maturity and the year. Consolidated obligation issuances financed 91.8 percent of the $92.3 billionrelated weighted-average interest rate (dollars in total assets as of December 31, 2020, a slight decrease from the financing ratio of 93.9millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) |
| | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 78,134 | | | 4.35 | | | $ | 21,819 | | | 0.29 | |
| Due after one year through two years | 12,981 | | | 4.25 | | | 3,247 | | | 1.20 | |
| Due after two years through three years | 7,982 | | | 3.79 | | | 2,236 | | | 1.83 | |
| Due after three years through four years | 4,033 | | | 3.86 | | | 3,145 | | | 1.51 | |
| Due after four years through five years | 2,427 | | | 3.31 | | | 3,047 | | | 2.21 | |
| Due after five years through 15 years | 4,750 | | | 3.07 | | | 10,920 | | | 1.65 | |
| Thereafter | 2 | | | 2.47 | | | 513 | | | 3.39 | |
| Total par value | 110,309 | | | 4.20 | | | 44,927 | | | 1.02 | |
| Deferred prepayment fees | 3 | | | | | (70) | | | |
| Discounts | (2) | | | | | (3) | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Hedging adjustments | (715) | | | | | 561 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 109,595 | | | | | $ | 45,415 | | | |
Total advances increased by 141.3 percent as of December 31, 2019.2022, compared to December 31, 2021. A significant percentage of advances originated during 2022 were short-term advances.
Consolidated obligations outstanding were primarily variable rate asAs of December 31, 20202022 and 2019. The2021, 45.5 percent and 78.1 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s advances were fixed rate. However, the Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of fixed-rate consolidated obligation bondsadvances to convert the interest rates, in effect,
into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on LIBOR and SOFR. As of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, 23.12021, 34.5 percent and 83.359.6 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s fixed-rate consolidated obligation bondsadvances were swapped. NoneThe majority of the Bank’s variable-rate consolidated obligation bondsadvances were swappedindexed to SOFR and OIS. The Bank also offers variable-rate advances that may be tied to indices such as the federal funds rate, prime rate, or constant maturity swap rates.
The Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions had 68.4 percent of the Bank’s total advances outstanding as of December 31, 20202022. Further information regarding the Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions and 2019. Asbreakdown of their individual advance balances as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, 4.42 percent and 33.9 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s fixed-rate consolidated obligation discount notes were swapped. Beginning June 30, 2020,2022 is contained in Item 1. Business—Credit Products—Advances. Management believes that the Bank ceased issuing LIBOR-based consolidated obligation bondsholds sufficient collateral, on a member-specific basis, to secure the advances to all borrowers, including these 10 institutions, and entering into LIBOR-based derivatives with maturities/termination dates beyond December 31, 2021. Supplementary financial datathe Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on the Bank’s short-term borrowings is set forth under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Supplementary Financial Information (Unaudited).these advances.
DepositsInvestments
The Bank offers demand and overnight deposit programs to members and qualifying non-members primarily as a liquidity management service. In addition, a member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds infollowing table presents more detailed information regarding investments held by the Bank that are collected(dollars in connectionmillions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| | Due in one year or less | | Due after one year through five years | | Due after five through 10 years | | Due after 10 years | | Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U. S. Treasury obligations | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | 98 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,713 | | | $ | 2,639 | | | $ | 74 | | | 2.81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 75 | | | 1,415 | | | 60 | | | — | | | 1,550 | | | 1,450 | | | 100 | | | 6.90 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 255 | | | 257 | | | 221 | | | 36 | | | 16.57 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 1 | | | 25 | | | 152 | | | 5,326 | | | 5,504 | | | 4,927 | | | 577 | | | 11.70 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 10 | | | 2,699 | | | 11,988 | | | 617 | | | 15,314 | | | 8,475 | | | 6,839 | | | 80.70 | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | 11 | | | 2,725 | | | 12,141 | | | 6,198 | | | 21,075 | | | 13,623 | | | 7,452 | | | 54.71 | |
| Total held-to-maturity securities | 86 | | | 4,141 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 22,626 | | | 15,074 | | | 7,552 | | | 50.10 | |
| Total investment securities | 2,701 | | | 4,239 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 25,339 | | | 17,713 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | 1,277 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,277 | | | 688 | | | 589 | | | 85.43 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,250 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,250 | | | 7,000 | | | (750) | | | (10.71) | |
Federal funds sold (1) | 8,036 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8,036 | | | 6,420 | | | 1,616 | | | 25.17 | |
| Total other investments | 15,563 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15,563 | | | 14,108 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Total investments | $ | 18,264 | | | $ | 4,239 | | | $ | 12,201 | | | $ | 6,198 | | | $ | 40,902 | | | $ | 31,821 | | | $ | 9,081 | | | 28.54 | |
Weighted-average yields on (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities | 1.89 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | 4.57 | % | | 2.96 | % | | 4.29 | % | | 4.19 | % | | | | | | | | |
_________(1)Federal funds sold includes $190 million and $199 million with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of those funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. For demand deposits, the Bank pays interest at the overnight rate. Most of these deposits represent member liquidity investments, which members may withdraw on demand. Therefore, the total account balanceBankUnited, National Association, one of the Bank’s deposits may fluctuate significantly. As a matter10 largest borrowers as of prudence, the Bank typically invests deposit funds in liquid short-term assets. Member loan demand, deposit flows,December 31, 2022 and liquidity management strategies influence the amount2021, respectively.
(2) The weighted average yields on available-for-sale securities and volatility of deposit balances carried with the Bank.
Capital
The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations specify that each FHLBank must meet certain minimum regulatory capital standards. The Bank must maintain (1) total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least four percent of its total assets; (2) leverage capital in an amount equal to at least five percent of its total assets; and (3) permanent capital in an amount equal to at least its regulatory risk-based capital requirement. Permanent capital is defined by the FHLBank Act and applicable regulationsheld-to-maturity securities are calculated as the sum of paid-in capital for Class B stock and retained earnings. Mandatorily redeemable capital stock is considered capital for regulatory purposes. These regulatory capital requirements, andeach debt security using the Bank’s compliance with these requirements, are presented in detail in Note 12—Capital and Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock to the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements.
Finance Agency regulations establish criteria for four capital classifications, based on the amount and type of capital held by an FHLBank, as follows:
•Adequately Capitalized - FHLBank meets or exceeds both risk-based and minimum capital requirements;
•Undercapitalized - FHLBank does not meet one or both of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements;
•Significantly Undercapitalized - FHLBank has less than 75 percent of one or both of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements; and
•Critically Undercapitalized - FHLBank total capital is two percent or less of total assets.
Under the regulations, the Director of the Finance Agency (Director) will make a capital classification for each FHLBank at least quarterly and notify the FHLBank in writing of any proposed action and provide an opportunity for the FHLBank to submit information relevant to such action. The Director is permitted to make discretionary classifications. An FHLBank must provide written notice to the Finance Agency within 10 days of any event or development that has caused or is likely to cause its permanent or total capital to fall below the level required to maintain its most recent capital classification or reclassification. In the event that an FHLBank is not adequately capitalized, the regulations delineate the types of prompt corrective actions that the Director may order, including submission of a capital restoration planperiod- end balances multiplied by the FHLBank and restrictions on its dividends, stock redemptions, executive compensation, new business activities, or any other actions the Director determines will ensure safe and sound operations and capital compliancecoupon rate adjusted by the FHLBank. On December 11, 2020,impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, divided by the Bank received notification fromtotal debt securities in the Director that, based on September 30, 2020 data, the Bank meets the definition of “adequately capitalized.”applicable available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities portfolio.
The Finance Agency issuedregulations prohibit an Advisory Bulletin providing for each FHLBank to maintain a ratio of at least twofrom purchasing MBS and asset-backed securities if its investment in such securities would exceed 300 percent of the FHLBank’s previous month-end regulatory capital stock to total assets, measured on a daily average basis at month end. As of December 31, 2020, the day it would purchase the securities. The Bank was in compliance with this ratio.
Allregulatory requirement as of the FHLBanks entered into a Capital Agreement, which is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. Under the Capital Agreement, each FHLBank allocates 20December 31, 2022 and 2021, as these investments were 274 percent of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the account balance equals at least oneand 295 percent of the FHLBank’s average balanceBank’s regulatory capital, respectively. The increase in MBS as of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. Restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends and are presented separately on the Statements of Condition.
Under the Bank’s financial management policy, the Bank targets to maintain (1) a capital-to-assets ratio of 4.50 percent to 5.00 percent; (2) a retained earnings account balance equal to the restricted retained earnings account balance, plus extremely stressed scenario losses; and (3) unrestricted retained earnings greater than the retained earnings target. Beginning in January 2021, the targeted capital-to-asset ratio was changed to 4.50 percent to 6.00 percent. The Bank believes that daily excess stock repurchases and consistent dividends give members greater certainty of a return of their principal or the receipt of a dividend, which in turn may have a positive impact on members’ appetite for advances. The Bank seeks to pay an amount of dividends each quarter that are consistent with an attractive rate of return on capital to its member shareholders relative to an established benchmark after providing for retained earnings as discussed above. Historically, the Bank’s dividend rate has increased with increases in LIBOR, while the spread between the dividend rate and LIBOR may shrink. Conversely, the dividend rate may decrease during periods of lower LIBOR, while the spread may increase. Beginning in 2021, the Bank anticipates it will begin using SOFR as the established benchmark for which it will calculate dividends. The Bank’s ability to maintain dividends depends on the Bank’s actual performance, its ability to maintain adequate retained earnings, other factors described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, and the discretion of the Bank’s board of directors. Information about dividends paid by the Bank during 2020, 2019, and 2018, is contained in Note 12—Capital and Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock to the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements.
December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was due to an increase in regulatory capital which increased the Bank’s capacity to invest in MBS.
The amount held in other investments varies each day based on the Bank’s liquidity needs as a result of advances demand, the earnings rates, and the availability of high-quality counterparties in the federal funds market. The increase in other investments as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, is primarily due to the need to fund increased advance demand.
Results of Operations
The following table presents the Bank’s significant income items for the years presented and provides information regarding the changes during those years (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Change |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net interest income | $ | 327 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 333 | | | $ | 46 | | | 16.17 | | | $ | (52) | | | (15.51) | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | 1 | | | 65.16 | | | (1) | | | 27.30 | |
| Noninterest income | 16 | | | 15 | | | 113 | | | 1 | | | 10.51 | | | (98) | | | (86.68) | |
| Noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | | | (11) | | | (6.86) | | | (14) | | | (9.01) | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | | | 6 | | | 38.55 | | | (13) | | | (47.73) | |
| Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | 51 | | | 38.54 | | | $ | (122) | | | (47.73) | |
•Net interest income included $2 million and $59 million of advance prepayment fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
•After considering the impact of the decrease in advance prepayment fees, net interest income was favorably impacted by an increase in advance balances, partially offset by an increase in interest rates which impacted interest bearing-liabilities more than the increase in interest-earning assets.
•Average advance balances were $75.8 billion for 2022, compared to $47.9 billion for 2021.
The following table presents the Bank’s significant income ratios for the years presented. These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| | | | | | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| Return on average equity (ROE) | | | | | | | | 3.18 | % | | 2.79 | % | | 3.95 | % | | 0.39 | % | | (1.16) | % |
| Average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.64 | | | 0.04 | | | 0.36 | | | 1.60 | | | (0.32) | |
| ROE spread to average daily SOFR | | | | | | | | 1.54 | | | 2.75 | | | 3.59 | | | (1.21) | | | (0.84) | |
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | | | | 0.16 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.22 | | | (0.18) | | | 0.12 | |
•The increase in ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to the increase in net income.
•The ROE spread to average daily SOFR for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, was impacted by the explanations provided above related to changes in ROE, offset by an increase in average daily SOFR.
•The decrease in the Bank’s interest-rate spread for the years ended December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was primarily due to increases in interest rates that impacted the expense from interest-bearing liabilities more than the income from interest-earning assets and the decrease in advance prepayment fees.
Business Outlook
The Bank’s business model is focused on enhancing the total value of the cooperative for its members by serving as their trusted advisor. The Bank focuses these efforts on offering readily available, competitively priced advances, a potential return on investment, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services. As part of the Bank’s cooperative structure, the Bank has chosen to operate with narrow margins, passing on its low funding costs to members, which causes the Bank’s profitability to be sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The state of the economy is a significant component in determining the Bank’s overall business outlook as it impacts advance demand, asset and collateral values, member financial stability, funding costs, and many other facets of the Bank’s portfolio. External factors such as liquidity levels at member institutions, fiscal and monetary policies, performance of global economies, and regulatory changes could have a significant effect either positive or negative on the Bank’s financial performance.
Interest rates are also a significant factor on the Bank’s business outlook. Changes in interest rates can impact the Bank’s interest rate risk management, profitability, and ROE. It can also impact member advance demand, as rate uncertainty can impact deposit levels at the Bank’s members.
The COVID-19 pandemic, along with the governmental and public action in response to the pandemic, created uncertainty and disruptions in the overall economic environment. The government and the FOMC’s measures aimed at increasing market liquidity contributed to a significant decrease in advance demand from Bank’s members during the initial years of the pandemic until early 2022. More recently, global uncertainty caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, and increased inflation rates in the United States continue to generate uncertainty as to the pace of the economic recovery in the near future. New FOMC measures beginning in 2022 have been targeting a reduction in market liquidity to manage inflation. This reduction in overall market liquidity has resulted in an increased demand for the Bank’s advances.
Merger activity involving the Bank’s members can impact the Bank’s business outlook. As the financial industry continues to experience consolidation, our membership base may decrease, and our advance balance and other business could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the size of the financial institutions involved in the merger. While the Bank’s balance sheet is designed to expand and contract based upon advance demand, the Bank’s business could be affected by this merger activity, including as a result of a single event, such as the loss of a member’s business due to acquisition by a non-member.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the distribution of the Bank’s total assets, liabilities, and capital by major class as of the dates indicated (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, | | | | |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent
of Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Advances | $ | 109,595 | | | 72.28 | | | $ | 45,415 | | | 57.67 | | | $ | 64,180 | | | 141.32 | |
| Investment securities | 25,339 | | | 16.71 | | | 17,713 | | | 22.49 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Other investments | 15,563 | | | 10.27 | | | 14,108 | | | 17.92 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Mortgage loans, net | 120 | | | 0.08 | | | 149 | | | 0.19 | | | (29) | | | (19.63) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | 1,005 | | | 0.66 | | | 1,361 | | | 1.73 | | | (356) | | | (26.21) | |
| Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 78,746 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 72,876 | | | 92.55 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount notes | $ | 39,781 | | | 27.63 | | | $ | 25,506 | | | 34.40 | | | $ | 14,275 | | | 55.97 | |
| Bonds | 101,729 | | | 70.66 | | | 46,186 | | | 62.29 | | | 55,543 | | | 120.26 | |
| Deposits | 1,821 | | | 1.26 | | | 2,054 | | | 2.77 | | | (233) | | | (11.34) | |
| Other liabilities | 645 | | | 0.45 | | | 405 | | | 0.54 | | | 240 | | | 59.37 | |
| Total liabilities | $ | 143,976 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 74,151 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 69,825 | | | 94.17 | |
| Capital stock | $ | 5,397 | | | 70.58 | | | $ | 2,383 | | | 51.85 | | | $ | 3,014 | | | 126.51 | |
| Retained earnings | 2,283 | | | 29.86 | | | 2,228 | | | 48.49 | | | 55 | | | 2.47 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (34) | | | (0.44) | | | (16) | | | (0.34) | | | (18) | | | 114.55 | |
| Total capital | $ | 7,646 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 4,595 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | 3,051 | | | 66.41 | |
Advances
The following table presents the Bank’s advances outstanding by year of maturity and the related weighted-average interest rate (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-average Interest Rate (%) |
| | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 78,134 | | | 4.35 | | | $ | 21,819 | | | 0.29 | |
| Due after one year through two years | 12,981 | | | 4.25 | | | 3,247 | | | 1.20 | |
| Due after two years through three years | 7,982 | | | 3.79 | | | 2,236 | | | 1.83 | |
| Due after three years through four years | 4,033 | | | 3.86 | | | 3,145 | | | 1.51 | |
| Due after four years through five years | 2,427 | | | 3.31 | | | 3,047 | | | 2.21 | |
| Due after five years through 15 years | 4,750 | | | 3.07 | | | 10,920 | | | 1.65 | |
| Thereafter | 2 | | | 2.47 | | | 513 | | | 3.39 | |
| Total par value | 110,309 | | | 4.20 | | | 44,927 | | | 1.02 | |
| Deferred prepayment fees | 3 | | | | | (70) | | | |
| Discounts | (2) | | | | | (3) | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Hedging adjustments | (715) | | | | | 561 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 109,595 | | | | | $ | 45,415 | | | |
Total advances increased by 141.3 percent as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021. A significant percentage of advances originated during 2022 were short-term advances.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, 45.5 percent and 78.1 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s advances were fixed rate. However, the Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of advances to convert the rates, in effect,
into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on SOFR. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, 34.5 percent and 59.6 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s fixed-rate advances were swapped. The majority of the Bank’s variable-rate advances were indexed to SOFR and OIS. The Bank also offers variable-rate advances that may be tied to indices such as the federal funds rate, prime rate, or constant maturity swap rates.
The Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions had 68.4 percent of the Bank’s total advances outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Further information regarding the Bank’s 10 largest borrowing member institutions and breakdown of their individual advance balances as of December 31, 2022 is contained in Item 1. Business—Credit Products—Advances. Management believes that the Bank holds sufficient collateral, on a member-specific basis, to secure the advances to all borrowers, including these 10 institutions, and the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.
Investments
The following table presents more detailed information regarding investments held by the Bank (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| | Due in one year or less | | Due after one year through five years | | Due after five through 10 years | | Due after 10 years | | Total | | Amount | | Percent |
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U. S. Treasury obligations | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | 98 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,713 | | | $ | 2,639 | | | $ | 74 | | | 2.81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 75 | | | 1,415 | | | 60 | | | — | | | 1,550 | | | 1,450 | | | 100 | | | 6.90 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 255 | | | 257 | | | 221 | | | 36 | | | 16.57 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 1 | | | 25 | | | 152 | | | 5,326 | | | 5,504 | | | 4,927 | | | 577 | | | 11.70 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 10 | | | 2,699 | | | 11,988 | | | 617 | | | 15,314 | | | 8,475 | | | 6,839 | | | 80.70 | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | 11 | | | 2,725 | | | 12,141 | | | 6,198 | | | 21,075 | | | 13,623 | | | 7,452 | | | 54.71 | |
| Total held-to-maturity securities | 86 | | | 4,141 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 22,626 | | | 15,074 | | | 7,552 | | | 50.10 | |
| Total investment securities | 2,701 | | | 4,239 | | | 12,201 | | | 6,198 | | | 25,339 | | | 17,713 | | | 7,626 | | | 43.06 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | 1,277 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,277 | | | 688 | | | 589 | | | 85.43 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,250 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,250 | | | 7,000 | | | (750) | | | (10.71) | |
Federal funds sold (1) | 8,036 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8,036 | | | 6,420 | | | 1,616 | | | 25.17 | |
| Total other investments | 15,563 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15,563 | | | 14,108 | | | 1,455 | | | 10.31 | |
| Total investments | $ | 18,264 | | | $ | 4,239 | | | $ | 12,201 | | | $ | 6,198 | | | $ | 40,902 | | | $ | 31,821 | | | $ | 9,081 | | | 28.54 | |
Weighted-average yields on (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities | 1.89 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | 4.57 | % | | 2.96 | % | | 4.29 | % | | 4.19 | % | | | | | | | | |
_________(1)Federal funds sold includes $190 million and $199 million with BankUnited, National Association, one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(2) The weighted average yields on available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities are calculated as the sum of each debt security using the period- end balances multiplied by the coupon rate adjusted by the impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, divided by the total debt securities in the applicable available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities portfolio.
The Finance Agency regulations prohibit an FHLBank from purchasing MBS and asset-backed securities if its investment in such securities would exceed 300 percent of the FHLBank’s previous month-end regulatory capital on the day it would purchase the securities. The Bank was in compliance with this regulatory requirement as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as these investments were 274 percent and 295 percent of the Bank’s regulatory capital, respectively. The increase in MBS as of
December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, was due to an increase in regulatory capital which increased the Bank’s capacity to invest in MBS.
The amount held in other investments varies each day based on the Bank’s liquidity needs as a result of advances demand, the earnings rates, and the availability of high-quality counterparties in the federal funds market. The increase in other investments as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, is primarily due to the need to fund increased advance demand.
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
The Bank purchased fixed-rate residential mortgage loans directly from PFIs and through participation in eligible mortgage loans from other FHLBanks. The decrease in mortgage loans held for portfolio from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022 was primarily due to the maturity and prepayments of these assets during the year.
The following table presents the Bank’s mortgage loans outstanding by redemption terms (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 8 | | | $ | 10 | |
| Due in one year through five years | 40 | | | 36 | |
| Due after five years through 15 years | 64 | | | 91 | |
| Thereafter | 8 | | | 13 | |
| Total unpaid principal balance | 120 | | | 150 | |
Other adjustment, net (1) | — | | | (1) | |
| Total mortgage loans held for portfolio | 120 | | | 149 | |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | — | | | — | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | $ | 120 | | | $ | 149 | |
____________(1) Consists of premiums, discounts, and hedging adjustments.
Members that sold mortgage loans to the Bank were located primarily in the southeastern United States; therefore, the Bank’s conventional mortgage loan portfolio was concentrated in that region as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The following table presents the percentage of unpaid principal balance of conventional residential mortgage loans held for portfolio for the five largest state concentrations.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Percent of Total | | Percent of Total |
| Florida | 22.52 | | | 23.14 | |
| South Carolina | 22.18 | | | 22.45 | |
| Virginia | 11.28 | | | 10.92 | |
| Georgia | 11.01 | | | 11.41 | |
| North Carolina | 7.85 | | | 8.47 | |
| All other | 25.16 | | | 23.61 | |
| Total | 100.00 | | | 100.00 | |
Deposits
The Bank offers demand and overnight deposit programs to members and qualifying non-members primarily as a liquidity management service. In addition, a member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds in the Bank that are collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of those funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. All the Bank’s deposits are uninsured. For demand deposits, the Bank pays interest at the overnight rate. Most of these deposits represent member liquidity investments, which members may withdraw on demand. Therefore, the total account balance of the Bank’s deposits may fluctuate significantly. As a matter of prudence, the Bank typically invests deposit funds in liquid short-term assets. Member loan demand, deposit flows, and liquidity management strategies influence the amount and volatility of deposit balances carried with the Bank.
Consolidated Obligations
The Bank funds its assets primarily through the issuance of consolidated obligation bonds and consolidated obligation discount notes. The increase in consolidated obligations from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022 was primarily a result of an increase in advances outstanding and increased liquidity needs during the year. Consolidated obligation issuances financed 93.3 percent of the $151.6 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2022, a slight increase from the financing ratio of 91.0 percent as of December 31, 2021.
The Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of fixed-rate consolidated obligation bonds to convert the interest rates, in effect, into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on SOFR. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, 91.9 percent and 83.8 percent, respectively, of the Bank’s fixed-rate consolidated obligation bonds were swapped. None of the Bank’s variable-rate consolidated obligation bonds were swapped as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. As of December 31, 2022, 28.7 percent of the Bank’s fixed-rate consolidated obligation discount notes were swapped and none of the Bank’s fixed-rate consolidated obligation discount notes were swapped as of December 31, 2021.
Capital
The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations specify that each FHLBank must meet certain minimum regulatory capital standards. The Bank must maintain (1) total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least four percent of its total assets; (2) leverage capital in an amount equal to at least five percent of its total assets; and (3) permanent capital in an amount equal to at least its regulatory risk-based capital requirement. Permanent capital is defined by the FHLBank Act and applicable regulations as the sum of paid-in capital for Class B stock and retained earnings. Mandatorily redeemable capital stock is considered capital for regulatory purposes. These regulatory capital requirements, and the Bank’s compliance with these requirements, are presented in detail in Note 10—Capital to the Bank’s 2022 audited financial statements. Finance Agency regulations establish criteria for four capital classifications, based on the amount and type of capital held by an FHLBank, as follows:
•Adequately Capitalized - FHLBank meets or exceeds both risk-based and minimum capital requirements;
•Undercapitalized - FHLBank does not meet one or both of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements;
•Significantly Undercapitalized - FHLBank has less than 75 percent of one or both of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements; and
•Critically Undercapitalized - FHLBank total capital is two percent or less of total assets.
The Director of the Finance Agency (Director) will make a capital classification for each FHLBank at least quarterly and notify the FHLBank in writing of any proposed action and provide an opportunity for the FHLBank to submit information relevant to such action. The Director is permitted to make discretionary reclassifications. An FHLBank must provide written notice to the Finance Agency within 10 days of any event or development that has caused or is likely to cause its permanent or total capital to fall below the level required to maintain its most recent capital classification or reclassification. In the event that an FHLBank is not adequately capitalized, the regulations delineate the types of prompt corrective actions that the Director may order, including submission of a capital restoration plan by the FHLBank and restrictions on its dividends, stock redemptions, executive compensation, new business activities, or any other actions the Director determines will ensure safe and sound operations and capital compliance by the FHLBank. On February 3, 2023, the Bank received notification from the Finance Agency that, based on December 31, 2022 data, it will recommend to the Director that the Bank meets the definition of "adequately capitalized.”
Each FHLBank is required to maintain a ratio of at least two percent of capital stock to total assets, measured on a daily average basis at month end. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank was in compliance with this ratio.
The Amended Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement (the Capital Agreement) provides that each FHLBank will, on a quarterly basis, contribute 20 percent of its net income to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations (excluding fair-value adjustments) for the calendar quarter. Restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends and are presented separately on the Statements of Condition.
Under the Bank’s financial management policy, the Bank targets were to maintain (1) a capital-to-assets ratio of 4.50 percent to 6.00 percent; (2) a retained earnings account balance equal to the restricted retained earnings account balance, plus extremely stressed scenario losses; and (3) unrestricted retained earnings greater than the retained earnings target. The Bank believes that
daily excess stock repurchases and consistent dividends give members greater certainty of a return of their principal or the receipt of a dividend, which in turn may have a positive impact on members’ appetite for advances. The Bank seeks to pay an amount of dividends each quarter that are consistent with an attractive rate of return on capital to its member shareholders relative to an established benchmark after providing for retained earnings as discussed above. Beginning in 2021, the Bank began using SOFR as the index for its dividend spreads. The Bank’s ability to maintain dividends depends on the Bank’s actual performance, its ability to maintain adequate retained earnings, other factors described in Item 1A. Risk Factors, and the discretion of the Bank’s board of directors. Information about dividends paid by the Bank during 2022, 2021, and 2020, is contained in Note 10—Capital to the Bank’s 2022 audited financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following is a discussion and analysis of the Bank’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022 and 2018.2021.
Net Income
The following table presents the Bank’s significant income items for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018,presented and provides information regarding the changes during those years (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net interest income | $ | 333 | | | $ | 535 | | | $ | 561 | | | $ | (202) | | | (37.76) | | | $ | (26) | | | (4.79) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Noninterest income | 113 | | | 19 | | | 51 | | | 94 | | | * | | (32) | | | (63.17) | |
| Noninterest expense | 163 | | | 146 | | | 150 | | | 17 | | | 11.64 | | | (4) | | | (2.58) | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 28 | | | 41 | | | 46 | | | (13) | | | (30.53) | | | (5) | | | (11.94) | |
| Net income | $ | 255 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 416 | | | $ | (112) | | | (30.53) | | | $ | (49) | | | (11.94) | |
____________
* Not meaningful | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Change |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net interest income | $ | 327 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 333 | | | $ | 46 | | | 16.17 | | | $ | (52) | | | (15.51) | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | 1 | | | 65.16 | | | (1) | | | 27.30 | |
| Noninterest income | 16 | | | 15 | | | 113 | | | 1 | | | 10.51 | | | (98) | | | (86.68) | |
| Noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | | | (11) | | | (6.86) | | | (14) | | | (9.01) | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | | | 6 | | | 38.55 | | | (13) | | | (47.73) | |
| Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | 51 | | | 38.54 | | | $ | (122) | | | (47.73) | |
Net Interest Income
The primary source of the Bank’s earnings is net interest income. Net interest income equals interest earned on assets (including member advances, mortgage loans, MBS held in portfolio, and other investments), less the interest expense incurred on liabilities (including consolidated obligations, deposits, and other borrowings). Also included in net interest income are miscellaneous related items such as prepayment fees, the amortization of debt issuance discounts, concession fees, and certain derivative instruments and hedging activities related adjustments.
The following table presents key components of net interest income for the years presented (in millions):
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Interest income: | Interest income: | | | | | | Interest income: | | | | | |
| Advances | Advances | $ | 870 | | | $ | 2,451 | | | $ | 2,227 | | Advances | $ | 1,748 | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 870 | |
| Investments | Investments | 394 | | | 1,271 | | | 1,075 | | Investments | 755 | | | 133 | | | 394 | |
| Mortgage loans | Mortgage loans | 13 | | | 18 | | | 21 | | Mortgage loans | 7 | | | 9 | | | 13 | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | | Loans to other FHLBanks | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total interest income | Total interest income | 1,277 | | | 3,740 | | | 3,323 | | Total interest income | 2,511 | | | 448 | | | 1,277 | |
| | Interest expense: | Interest expense: | | Interest expense: | |
| Consolidated obligations | Consolidated obligations | 939 | | | 3,179 | | | 2,743 | | Consolidated obligations | 2,150 | | | 167 | | | 939 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 5 | | | 26 | | | 19 | | Interest-bearing deposits | 34 | | | — | | | 5 | |
| | Total interest expense | Total interest expense | 944 | | | 3,205 | | | 2,762 | | Total interest expense | 2,184 | | | 167 | | | 944 | |
| Net interest income | Net interest income | $ | 333 | | | $ | 535 | | | $ | 561 | | Net interest income | $ | 327 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 333 | |
As discussed above, net interest income includes components of hedging activity. When hedging relationships qualify for hedge accounting, the interest components of the hedging derivatives will be reflected in interest income or expense. Beginning on January 1, 2019, the fairFair value gains and losses of derivatives and hedged items designated in fair value hedgehedging relationships are also recognized in interest income or interest expense. Prior to January 1, 2019, the portion of fair value gains and losses of derivatives and hedged items representing hedge ineffectiveness were recorded in noninterest income. When a hedging relationship is discontinued, the cumulative fair value adjustment on the hedged item will
be amortized into interest income or expense over the remaining life of the asset or liability. The impact of hedging on net interest income was a decrease of $285$211 million, $31$219 million, and $91$285 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.
Below are the primary factors that impacted net interest income and net income for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
•Net interest income included $2 million and $59 million of advance prepayment fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The decrease in net interest incomeAverage advance balances were $75.8 billion for 2020,2022, compared to 2019, was due to decreased advance balances, as well as lower interest rates. During 2020, market interest rates declined significantly and have remained as historically low levels and these low market interest rates further impacted the Bank’s income on interest-earning assets. As noted previously, during 2020, conditions in the financial markets have been impacted by the global pandemic associated with COVID-19. In response to these market conditions, the FOMC lowered the target range$47.9 billion for federal funds to 0.00 percent to 0.25 percent. Additionally, the
Federal Reserve implemented a number of asset purchase programs to provide additional liquidity to the financial markets. The additional market liquidity, as well as increased deposit levels at the Bank’s members, resulted in lower demand for Bank’s advances.
The following table presents spreads between the average yield on total interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 (dollars in millions). The interest-rate spread is affected by the inclusion or exclusion of net interest income or expense associated with the Bank’s derivatives. If the derivatives do not qualify for fair-value hedge accounting under GAAP, the interest income or expense associated with the derivatives is excluded from net interest income and from the calculation of interest-rate spread and is recorded in Noninterest income (loss) as “Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities.derivatives.” Amortization associated with some hedging-related basis adjustments is also reflected in net interest income, which affects interest-rate spread.
The Bank’s interest-rate spread was 16 basis points, 34 basis points, and 22 basis points 25 basis points,for 2022, 2021, and 28 basis points for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The decrease in interest-rate spread during 2020,for 2022, compared to 2019,2021, was primarily due to the decreaseincreases in interest raterates that impacted the earnings from interest-bearing assets more than the expense from interest-bearing liabilities.liabilities more than the income from interest-earning assets. The decrease in the interest-rate spread for 2022, compared to 2021, was also impacted by the decrease in advance prepayment fees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 (1) | | 2019 (1) | | 2018 (1) |
| | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) | | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) | | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits (2) | $ | 3,273 | | | $ | 17 | | | 0.54 | | | $ | 4,101 | | | $ | 93 | | | 2.27 | | | $ | 4,856 | | | $ | 101 | | | 2.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 8,248 | | | 32 | | | 0.39 | | | 5,528 | | | 118 | | | 2.13 | | | 2,410 | | | 46 | | | 1.92 | |
| Federal funds sold | 12,423 | | | 48 | | | 0.39 | | | 12,623 | | | 279 | | | 2.21 | | | 11,818 | | | 223 | | | 1.89 | |
Investment securities (3) | 24,850 | | | 297 | | | 1.19 | | | 26,521 | | | 781 | | | 2.95 | | | 26,067 | | | 705 | | | 2.71 | |
| Advances | 80,991 | | | 870 | | | 1.07 | | | 98,428 | | | 2,451 | | | 2.49 | | | 105,674 | | | 2,227 | | | 2.11 | |
Mortgage loans (4) | 260 | | | 13 | | | 4.90 | | | 329 | | | 18 | | | 5.46 | | | 396 | | | 21 | | | 5.28 | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | 1 | | | — | | | 0.09 | | | 12 | | | — | | | 2.54 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 1.59 | |
| Total interest-earning assets | 130,046 | | | 1,277 | | | 0.98 | | | 147,542 | | | 3,740 | | | 2.53 | | | 151,224 | | | 3,323 | | | 2.20 | |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | (1) | | | | | | | (1) | | | | | | | (1) | | | | | |
| Other assets | 1,626 | | | | | | | 1,153 | | | | | | | 1,131 | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 131,671 | | | | | | | $ | 148,694 | | | | | | | $ | 152,354 | | | | | |
| Liabilities and Capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits (5) | $ | 1,982 | | | 5 | | | 0.23 | | | $ | 1,307 | | | 26 | | | 2.03 | | | $ | 1,067 | | | 19 | | | 1.74 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount notes | 52,397 | | | 357 | | | 0.68 | | | 59,736 | | | 1,371 | | | 2.29 | | | 60,847 | | | 1,139 | | | 1.87 | |
| Bonds | 69,865 | | | 582 | | | 0.83 | | | 79,635 | | | 1,808 | | | 2.27 | | | 82,175 | | | 1,604 | | | 1.95 | |
| Other borrowings | 3 | | | — | | | 2.70 | | | 8 | | | — | | | 3.51 | | | 4 | | | — | | | 4.29 | |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 124,247 | | | 944 | | | 0.76 | | | 140,686 | | | 3,205 | | | 2.28 | | | 144,093 | | | 2,762 | | | 1.92 | |
| Other liabilities | 971 | | | | | | | 799 | | | | | | | 746 | | | | | |
| Total capital | 6,453 | | | | | | | 7,209 | | | | | | | 7,515 | | | | | |
| Total liabilities and capital | $ | 131,671 | | | | | | | $ | 148,694 | | | | | | | $ | 152,354 | | | | | |
| Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets | | | $ | 333 | | | 0.26 | | | | | $ | 535 | | | 0.36 | | | | | $ | 561 | | | 0.37 | |
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | 0.22 | | | | | | | 0.25 | | | | | | | 0.28 | |
| Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | 104.67 | | | | | | | 104.87 | | | | | | | 104.95 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) | | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) | | Average
Balance | | Interest | | Yield/
Rate
(%) |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits (1) | $ | 2,869 | | | $ | 62 | | | 2.17 | | | $ | 1,516 | | | $ | 2 | | | 0.12 | | | $ | 3,273 | | | $ | 17 | | | 0.54 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,940 | | | 143 | | | 2.06 | | | 3,966 | | | 2 | | | 0.07 | | | 8,248 | | | 32 | | | 0.39 | |
| Federal funds sold | 10,124 | | | 173 | | | 1.71 | | | 10,299 | | | 8 | | | 0.08 | | | 12,423 | | | 48 | | | 0.39 | |
Investment securities (2) | 19,752 | | | 377 | | | 1.91 | | | 18,305 | | | 121 | | | 0.66 | | | 24,850 | | | 297 | | | 1.19 | |
Advances (3) | 75,780 | | | 1,748 | | | 2.31 | | | 47,912 | | | 306 | | | 0.64 | | | 80,991 | | | 870 | | | 1.07 | |
Mortgage loans (4) | 132 | | | 7 | | | 5.17 | | | 179 | | | 9 | | | 5.37 | | | 260 | | | 13 | | | 4.90 | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | 28 | | | 1 | | | 2.67 | | | 2 | | | — | | | 0.07 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 0.09 | |
| Total interest-earning assets | 115,625 | | | 2,511 | | | 2.17 | | | 82,179 | | | 448 | | | 0.55 | | | 130,046 | | | 1,277 | | | 0.98 | |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | — | | | | | | | — | | | | | | | (1) | | | | | |
| Other assets | 825 | | | | | | | 1,113 | | | | | | | 1,626 | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 116,450 | | | | | | | $ | 83,292 | | | | | | | $ | 131,671 | | | | | |
| Liabilities and Capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits (5) | $ | 2,111 | | | 34 | | | 1.63 | | | $ | 2,456 | | | — | | | — | | | $ | 1,982 | | | 5 | | | 0.23 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount notes | 43,530 | | | 805 | | | 1.85 | | | 23,617 | | | 12 | | | 0.05 | | | 52,397 | | | 357 | | | 0.68 | |
| Bonds | 62,955 | | | 1,345 | | | 2.14 | | | 51,785 | | | 155 | | | 0.30 | | | 69,865 | | | 582 | | | 0.83 | |
| Other borrowings | 13 | | | — | | | 1.08 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 3.41 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 2.70 | |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 108,609 | | | 2,184 | | | 2.01 | | | 77,859 | | | 167 | | | 0.21 | | | 124,247 | | | 944 | | | 0.76 | |
| Other liabilities | 2,038 | | | | | | | 654 | | | | | | | 971 | | | | | |
| Total capital | 5,803 | | | | | | | 4,779 | | | | | | | 6,453 | | | | | |
| Total liabilities and capital | $ | 116,450 | | | | | | | $ | 83,292 | | | | | | | $ | 131,671 | | | | | |
| Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets | | | $ | 327 | | | 0.28 | | | | | $ | 281 | | | 0.34 | | | | | $ | 333 | | | 0.26 | |
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | 0.16 | | | | | | | 0.34 | | | | | | | 0.22 | |
| Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | 106.46 | | | | | | | 105.55 | | | | | | | 104.67 | |
____________
(1)For 2020 and 2019, interest amounts reported for advances and consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes include realized and unrealized gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships. Prior period interest amounts do not conform to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
(2)Includes amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral paid under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
(3)(2)Includes trading securities at fair value and available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
(3)Interest income and average yield include net prepayment fees on advances of $2 million, $59 million, and $60 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
(4)Nonperforming mortgage loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.
(5)Includes amounts recognized for the right to return cash collateral received under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
Net interest income for the years presented was affected by changes in average balances (volume change) and changes in average rates (rate change) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table presents the extent to which volume changes and rate changes affected the Bank’s interest income and interest expense (in millions). As presented in the table below and as discussed above, the overall changechanges in net interest income during 2020,2022, compared to 2019, was primarily2021, were due to lowerchanges in both average balances and interest rates.
| | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| | | Volume (1) | | Rate (1) | | Increase (Decrease) | | Volume (1) | | Rate (1) | | Increase (Decrease) | | Volume (1) | | Rate (1) | | Total Change | | Volume (1) | | Rate (1) | | Total Change |
| Increase (decrease) in interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in interest income: | | Change in interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | $ | (16) | | | $ | (60) | | | $ | (76) | | | $ | (17) | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | (8) | | Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 3 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 60 | | | $ | (6) | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | (15) | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 40 | | | (126) | | | (86) | | | 66 | | | 6 | | | 72 | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 4 | | | 137 | | | 141 | | | (11) | | | (19) | | | (30) | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | (4) | | | (227) | | | (231) | | | 16 | | | 40 | | | 56 | | Federal funds sold | — | | | 165 | | | 165 | | | (7) | | | (33) | | | (40) | |
| Investment securities | Investment securities | (46) | | | (438) | | | (484) | | | 13 | | | 63 | | | 76 | | Investment securities | 9 | | | 247 | | | 256 | | | (65) | | | (111) | | | (176) | |
| Advances | Advances | (376) | | | (1,205) | | | (1,581) | | | (160) | | | 384 | | | 224 | | Advances | 263 | | | 1,179 | | | 1,442 | | | (283) | | | (281) | | | (564) | |
| Mortgage loans | Mortgage loans | (3) | | | (2) | | | (5) | | | (4) | | | 1 | | | (3) | | Mortgage loans | (2) | | | — | | | (2) | | | (5) | | | 1 | | | (4) | |
| | Loans to other FHLBanks | | Loans to other FHLBanks | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Total | Total | (405) | | | (2,058) | | | (2,463) | | | (86) | | | 503 | | | 417 | | Total | 277 | | | 1,786 | | | 2,063 | | | (377) | | | (452) | | | (829) | |
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in interest expense: | | Change in interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 10 | | | (31) | | | (21) | | | 4 | | | 3 | | | 7 | | Interest-bearing deposits | — | | | 34 | | | 34 | | | 1 | | | (6) | | | (5) | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | Consolidated obligations, net: | | Consolidated obligations, net: | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | (151) | | | (863) | | | (1,014) | | | (21) | | | 253 | | | 232 | | Discount notes | 18 | | | 775 | | | 793 | | | (128) | | | (217) | | | (345) | |
| Bonds | Bonds | (199) | | | (1,027) | | | (1,226) | | | (51) | | | 255 | | | 204 | | Bonds | 41 | | | 1,149 | | | 1,190 | | | (123) | | | (304) | | | (427) | |
| | Total | Total | (340) | | | (1,921) | | | (2,261) | | | (68) | | | 511 | | | 443 | | Total | 59 | | | 1,958 | | | 2,017 | | | (250) | | | (527) | | | (777) | |
| Decrease in net interest income | $ | (65) | | | $ | (137) | | | $ | (202) | | | $ | (18) | | | $ | (8) | | | $ | (26) | | |
| Change in net interest income | | Change in net interest income | $ | 218 | | | $ | (172) | | | $ | 46 | | | $ | (127) | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | (52) | |
____________
(1)Volume change is calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the previous rate, while rate change is calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the previous volume. The rate/volume change, calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the change in volume, is allocated between volume change and rate change at the ratio each component bears to the absolute value of its total.
Derivatives and Hedging Activity
The following tables present the net effect of derivatives and hedging activity on the Bank’s results of operations for the years presented (in millions):
| | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| | | Advances | | Investments | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes | | | Total | | Advances | | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes | | | Total |
| Net interest income: | Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization or accretion of active hedging relationships | Amortization or accretion of active hedging relationships | $ | (56) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (58) | | Amortization or accretion of active hedging relationships | $ | (185) | | | | $ | (12) | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (197) | |
| Net changes in fair value hedges | Net changes in fair value hedges | 36 | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | | 38 | | Net changes in fair value hedges | 213 | | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | | 218 | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | (341) | | | — | | | 41 | | | 39 | | | | (261) | | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | (17) | | | | (187) | | | (32) | | | | (236) | |
Other (2) | Other (2) | (4) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | (4) | | Other (2) | 4 | | | | — | | | — | | | | 4 | |
| Total effect on net interest income | Total effect on net interest income | $ | (365) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 39 | | | | $ | (285) | | Total effect on net interest income | $ | 15 | | | | $ | (195) | | | $ | (31) | | | | $ | (211) | |
| Effect on noninterest income: | | Effect on noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | | Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | $ | — | | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 2 | |
| | Losses on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | $ | (2) | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (6) | | |
| Net gains on trading securities (3) | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | | 3 | | |
| Total effect on noninterest income | $ | (2) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (3) | | |
|
____________
(1)Represents interest income or expense on derivatives included in net interest income.
(2)Amount in “Other” includes the price alignment amount on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract.
(3)Includes only those gains or losses on trading securities or financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative “assigned;” therefore, this line item may not agree to the income statement.
| | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| | | Advances | | Investments | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | | Balance Sheet | | | Total | | Advances | | Investments | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | | Total |
| Net interest income: | Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | Net interest income: | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization or accretion of hedging activities | Amortization or accretion of hedging activities | $ | (28) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (28) | | Amortization or accretion of hedging activities | $ | (99) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (99) | |
| Net changes in fair value hedges | Net changes in fair value hedges | 11 | | | — | | | (2) | | | | — | | | | 9 | | Net changes in fair value hedges | 125 | | | — | | | (8) | | | | 117 | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | 21 | | | — | | | (32) | | | | — | | | | (11) | | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | (331) | | | — | | | 113 | | | | (218) | |
Other (2) | Other (2) | — | | | — | | | (1) | | | | — | | | | (1) | | Other (2) | (19) | | | — | | | — | | | | (19) | |
| Total effect on net interest income | Total effect on net interest income | $ | 4 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (35) | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (31) | | Total effect on net interest income | $ | (324) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 105 | | | | $ | (219) | |
| Effect on noninterest income: | | Effect on noninterest income: | | | | | | | | |
| | | Losses on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | — | | | (3) | | | — | | | | (1) | | | | (4) | | |
| Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | | Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 2 | |
| Net losses on trading securities (3) | Net losses on trading securities (3) | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3 | | Net losses on trading securities (3) | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | | (1) | |
| Total effect on noninterest income | Total effect on noninterest income | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | (1) | | | | $ | (1) | | Total effect on noninterest income | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1 | |
____________
(1)Represents interest income or expense on derivatives included in net interest income.
(2)Amount in “Other” includes the price alignment amount on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract.
(3)Includes only those gains or losses on trading securities or financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative “assigned;” therefore, this line item may not agree to the income statement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (1) | | |
| | Advances | | Investments | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes | | Balance Sheet | | Other(5) | | Total |
| Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization or accretion of hedging activities (2) | $ | (28) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (29) | |
Net interest settlements (3) | (20) | | | — | | | (40) | | | (2) | | | — | | | — | | | (62) | |
| Total effect on net interest income | $ | (48) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (41) | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (91) | |
| Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains (losses) on fair value hedges | $ | 32 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 32 | |
| Losses (gains) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | (1) | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Price alignment amount on derivatives | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4) | | | (4) | |
| Total net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities | 31 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | (1) | | | 1 | | | (4) | | | 29 | |
Net losses on trading securities (4) | — | | | (1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
| Total effect on noninterest income | $ | 31 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | 28 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| | Advances | | Investments | | Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds | | Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes | | | | | | Total |
| Effect on net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization or accretion of hedging activities | $ | (56) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | (58) | |
| Net changes in fair value hedges | 36 | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | | | | | 38 | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) | (341) | | | — | | | 41 | | | 39 | | | | | | | (261) | |
Other (2) | (4) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | (4) | |
| Total effect on net interest income | $ | (365) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 39 | | | | | | | $ | (285) | |
| Effect on noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Losses on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements | $ | (2) | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | (6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net gains on trading securities (3) | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | 3 | |
| Total effect on noninterest income | $ | (2) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | (3) | |
____________
(1)Beginning in 2019, amounts reported include realized and unrealized gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships as part of net interest income. Prior period amounts do not conform to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
(2)Represents the amortization or accretion of hedging fair value adjustments for both open and closed hedge positions.
(3)Represents interest income or expense on derivatives included in net interest income.
(4)(2)Amount in “Other” includes the price alignment amount on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract.
(3)Includes only those gains or losses on trading securities or financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative “assigned;” therefore, this line item may not agree to the income statement.
(5)Amount in “Other” includes the price alignment amount on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract.
Noninterest Income (Loss)
The following table presents the components of noninterest income (loss) for the years presented (dollars in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
| 2020 | | 2019(1) | | 2018(1) | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | $ | — | | | $ | (13) | | | $ | (3) | | | $ | 13 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | (10) | | | (291.12) | |
| Net gains (losses) on trading securities | 4 | | | 3 | | | (1) | | | 1 | | | 25.94 | | | 4 | | | 402.12 | |
| Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities | (6) | | | (4) | | | 29 | | | (2) | | | (49.13) | | | (33) | | | (114.53) | |
| Net realized gains from sale of investment securities | 85 | | | — | | | — | | | 85 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Standby letters of credit fees | 19 | | | 24 | | | 25 | | | (5) | | | (19.69) | | | (1) | | | (4.66) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | 11 | | | 9 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 28.34 | | | 8 | | | 498.69 | |
| Total noninterest income | $ | 113 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 94 | | | * | | $ | (32) | | | (63.17) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Change |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (losses) gains on investment securities | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 1 | | | 100.00 | | | $ | (90) | | | (100.95) | |
| Net gains (losses) on derivatives | 2 | | | 1 | | | (6) | | | 1 | | | 35.55 | | | 7 | | | 121.27 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Standby letters of credit fees | 8 | | | 11 | | | 19 | | | (3) | | | (27.33) | | | (8) | | | (42.75) | |
| Loss on litigation settlements, net | 4 | | | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | * | | — | | | — | |
| Other | 2 | | | 4 | | | 11 | | | (2) | | | (21.56) | | | (7) | | | (71.42) | |
| Total noninterest income | $ | 16 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 113 | | | $ | 1 | | | 10.51 | | | $ | (98) | | | (86.68) | |
____________
(1) For 2019, amounts reported exclude realized and unrealized gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships. Prior period amounts do not conform to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
* Not meaningful.
During the first quarter of 2020,2022, the Bank sold its entire private-label MBS portfolio. Proceeds from the sale totaled $921received a $4 million and resultednet litigation settlement related to certain investments in a realized gain of $85 million.LIBOR-based financial instruments claim.
Beginning on January 1, 2019, changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk for designated fair value hedges are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2019, for fair value hedges, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedge item) was recorded in noninterest income as net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities.
Noninterest Expense and AHP Assessment
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | | Increase (Decrease) |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 102 | | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | (16) | |
| Cost of quarters | 4 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | — | | | (1) | |
| Other operating expenses | 32 | | | 35 | | | 33 | | | (3) | | | 2 | |
| Total operating expenses | 138 | | | 116 | | | 131 | | | 22 | | | (15) | |
| Finance Agency and Office of Finance | 17 | | | 18 | | | 15 | | | (1) | | | 3 | |
| Other | 8 | | | 12 | | | 4 | | | (4) | | | 8 | |
| Total noninterest expense | 163 | | | 146 | | | 150 | | | 17 | | | (4) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 28 | | | 41 | | | 46 | | | (13) | | | (5) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total noninterest expense and AHP assessment | $ | 191 | | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 196 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | (9) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | | Change |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 vs. 2021 | | 2021 vs. 2020 |
| Noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 65 | | | $ | 80 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | (15) | | | $ | (22) | |
| Cost of quarters | 4 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | — | | | — | |
| Other operating expenses | 43 | | | 34 | | | 32 | | | 9 | | | 2 | |
| Total operating expenses | 112 | | | 118 | | | 138 | | | (6) | | | (20) | |
| Finance Agency and Office of Finance | 18 | | | 17 | | | 17 | | | 1 | | | — | |
| Affordable Housing Program non-statutory contribution | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | — | |
| Other | 3 | | | 14 | | | 8 | | | (11) | | | 6 | |
| Total noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | | | (11) | | | (14) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | | | 6 | | | (13) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total noninterest expense and AHP assessment | $ | 159 | | | $ | 164 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | (5) | | | $ | (27) | |
The increasedecrease in total noninterestcompensation and benefits expense for 2020,2022, compared to 2019,2021, was primarily due to a reduction in the Bank's net pension costs.
During 2022, the Bank making an additional $20made a $5 million retirement planvoluntary non-statutory contribution in January 2020, which was recorded in compensation and benefits expense,to its AHP.
The Bank records AHP assessment expense at a rate of 10 percent of income before assessment, excluding interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
Additional Financial Data.
The following table presents additional financial data for the last five fiscal years (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of or for the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Statements of Condition (as of year end) | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | $ | 78,746 | | | $ | 92,295 | | | $ | 149,857 | | | $ | 154,476 | |
| Advances | 109,595 | | | 45,415 | | | 52,168 | | | 97,167 | | | 108,462 | |
Investments (1) | 40,902 | | | 31,821 | | | 36,380 | | | 50,617 | | | 44,309 | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 120 | | | 149 | | | 218 | | | 296 | | | 360 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated obligations, net (2) | 141,510 | | | 71,692 | | | 84,764 | | | 140,637 | | | 145,139 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total capital stock Class B putable | 5,397 | | | 2,383 | | | 3,078 | | | 4,988 | | | 5,486 | |
| Retained earnings | 2,283 | | | 2,228 | | | 2,198 | | | 2,153 | | | 2,110 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (34) | | | (16) | | | (16) | | | 22 | | | 51 | |
| Total capital | 7,646 | | | 4,595 | | | 5,260 | | | 7,163 | | | 7,647 | |
| Statements of Income (for the year ended) | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (3) | 327 | | | 281 | | | 333 | | | 535 | | | 561 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Standby letters of credit fees | 8 | | | 11 | | | 19 | | | 24 | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 184 | | | 133 | | | 255 | | | 367 | | | 416 | |
| Performance Ratios (%) | | | | | | | | | |
Return on equity (4) | 3.18 | | | 2.79 | | | 3.95 | | | 5.09 | | | 5.54 | |
Return on assets (5) | 0.16 | | | 0.16 | | | 0.19 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.27 | |
Net interest margin (6) | 0.28 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.26 | | | 0.36 | | | 0.37 | |
| Interest-rate spread | 0.16 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.22 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.28 | |
Regulatory capital ratio (as of year end) (7) | 5.07 | | | 5.86 | | | 5.72 | | | 4.77 | | | 4.92 | |
Equity to assets ratio (8) | 4.98 | | | 5.74 | | | 4.90 | | | 4.85 | | | 4.93 | |
Dividend payout ratio (9) | 70.11 | | | 77.27 | | | 93.86 | | | 88.25 | | | 74.12 | |
____________
(1) Investments consist of interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold, and securities classified as trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity.
(2) The amounts presented are the Bank’s primary obligations on consolidated obligations outstanding. The par value of the other FHLBanks’ outstanding consolidated obligations for which the Bank is jointly and severally liable was as follows (in millions):
| | | | | |
| December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,037,537 | |
| December 31, 2021 | 580,909 | |
| December 31, 2020 | 662,051 | |
| December 31, 2019 | 885,114 | |
| December 31, 2018 | 886,081 | |
(3) Effective January 1, 2019, the Bank adopted new hedge accounting guidance that required interest amounts reported for advances, and consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes to include realized gains (losses) on hedged items and derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships.
(4) Calculated as net income, divided by average total equity.
(5) Calculated as net income, divided by average total assets.
(6) Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
(7) Regulatory capital ratio is regulatory capital, which does not include accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as a percentage of total assets as of year end.
(8) Calculated as average total equity, divided by average total assets.
(9) Calculated as dividends declared during the year, divided by net income during the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is necessary to satisfy members’ borrowing needs on a timely basis, repay maturing and called consolidated obligations, and meet other obligations and operating requirements. Many members rely on the Bank as a source of standby liquidity, so the Bank attempts to be in a position to meet member funding needs on a timely basis. The Bank is required to maintain liquidity in accordance with the FHLBank Act, Finance Agency regulations, and policies established by the Bank’s management and board of directors. In addition, the Finance Agency, at times, has issued guidance and expectations to the FHLBanks related to liquidity.
Sources of Liquidity. The Bank’s principal source of liquidity is consolidated obligation debt instruments. To provide additional liquidity, the Bank also may use other short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements
to repurchase, and loans from other FHLBanks. The Bank’s consolidated obligations are not obligations of the U.S. and are not guaranteed by either the U.S. or any government agency, but have historically received the same credit rating as the government bond credit rating of the United States. As a result, the Bank generally has comparatively stable access to funding through a diverse investor base at relatively favorable spreads to U.S. Treasury rates. The Bank’s income and liquidity would be adversely affected if it were not able to access the capital markets at competitive rates for an extended period.
The Bank’s short-term funding is generally driven by member advance demand and is achieved through the issuance of consolidated discount notes and short-term consolidated bonds. Access to short-term debt markets has been reliable because investors, driven by increased liquidity preferences and risk aversion, including the effects of recent SEC money market fund reform, have often sought the Bank’s short-term debt as an asset of choice.
The Bank is focused on maintaining an adequate liquidity balance and a funding balance between its financial assets and financial liabilities. The Bank monitors the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities and is committed to prudent risk management practices. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, the Bank considers contractual maturities of its financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e. estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations). External factors including Bank member borrowing needs, supply and demand in the debt markets, and other factors may also affect the liquidity balances and the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities.
Contingency plans are in place that prioritize the allocation of liquidity resources in the event of operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance. Under the FHLBank Act, the Secretary of Treasury has the authority, at his discretion, to purchase consolidated obligations up to an aggregate amount of $4.0 billion. No borrowings under this authority have been outstanding since 1977.
Liquidity Reserves for Deposits. Finance Agency regulations require the Bank to hold a total amount of cash, obligations of the U.S., andUnited States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, or advances with maturities of less thannot exceeding five years, in an amount not less than the amount of total member deposits. The Bank has complied with this requirement throughout 2020.2022.
Operational Liquidity. In order to ensure adequate operational liquidity (generally, the ready cash and borrowing capacity available to meet the Bank’s intra-dayintraday needs) each day, Bank policy establishes a daily liquidity target based upon member deposit levels and current day liability maturities and asset settlements. The Bank has met this liquidity requirement throughout 2020.2022.
Additional Liquidity Guidance. The Finance Agency issued an Advisory Bulletin on FHLBank liquidity (Liquidity Guidance AB) that communicates the Finance Agency’s expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity to enable the Bank to provide advances and standby letters of credit for members during a sustained capital market disruption, assuming no access to capital markets and assuming renewal of all maturing advances for a period of between ten to thirty calendar days. The Finance Agency periodically issues supervisory letters that identify thresholds for measures of liquidity within the established ranges set forth in the Liquidity Guidance AB.
The Liquidity Guidance AB’s measurements of liquidity include a cash flow scenario, on a daily basis, that projects forward the number of days for which the Bank should maintain positive cash balances assuming the renewal of all maturing advances and the maintenance of a liquidity reserve for outstanding letters of credit. The measurements of liquidity also include a funding gap measurement of the difference between assets and liabilities that are scheduled to mature during a specified period, expressed as a percentage of the Bank’s total assets to reduce the liquidity risks associated with a mismatch in asset and liability maturities, including an undue reliance on short-term debt funding, which may increase debt rollover risk. The Liquidity Guidance AB permits an FHLBank to temporarily decrease its liquidity position, in a safe and sound manner, below the stated regulatory levels, as necessary for providing unanticipated extensions of advances to members or draws on letters of credit to beneficiaries.
Since 2018, the Bank has increased the amount of liquid assets it holds to meet this guidance. The Bank has met this liquidity requirement as directed by the Finance Agency throughout 2020.2022.
Sources of Liquidity. The Bank’s principal source of liquidity is consolidated obligation debt instruments. To provide additional liquidity, the Bank also may use other short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and loans from other FHLBanks. The Bank’s consolidated obligations are not obligations of the United States and are not guaranteed by either the United States or any government agency, but have historically received the same credit rating as the government bond credit rating of the United States. As a result, the Bank generally has comparatively stable access to funding through a diverse investor base at relatively favorable spreads to U.S. Treasury rates. The Bank’s income and liquidity would be adversely affected if it were not able to access the capital markets at competitive rates for an extended period.
As discussed elsewhere in this Report, the COVID-19 pandemic continued to impact the financial markets during 2020. The Bank maintained continual access to funding and adapted its debt issuance to meet the needs of its members throughout 2020. The Bank relies on access to the capital markets to meet its funding needs, and the Bank expects continued sufficient access to capital markets.
The Bank’s short-term funding is generally driven by member demand and is achieved through the issuance of consolidated discount notes and short-term consolidated bonds. Access to short-term debt markets has been reliable because investors, driven by increased liquidity preferences and risk aversion, including the effects of money market fund reform, have often sought the Bank’s short-term debt as an asset of choice.
The Bank is focused on maintaining an adequate liquidity balance and a funding balance between its financial assets and financial liabilities and the FHLBanks work collectively to manage the system-wide liquidity and funding needs. Management and the FHLBanks jointly monitor the combined refinancing risk primarily by tracking the maturities of financial assets and financial liabilities. The Bank monitors the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities and is committed to prudent risk management practices. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, the Bank considers contractual maturities of its financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e. estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations). External factors including Bank member borrowing needs, supply and demand in the debt markets, and other factors may also affect the liquidity balances and the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities. See the notes to the Bank’s 2020 audited financial statements for more information regarding contractual maturities of certain of the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities.
Contingency plans are in place that prioritize the allocation of liquidity resources in the event of operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance. Under the FHLBank Act, the Secretary of Treasury has the authority, at his discretion, to
purchaseSummary of Cash Flows
The following table presents a summary of net cash provided by (used in) the Bank’s operating, investing, and financing activities (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | 1,487 | | | $ | 845 | | | $ | (441) | |
| Investing activities | (76,664) | | | 10,634 | | | 59,849 | |
| Financing activities | 74,439 | | | (13,505) | | | (57,414) | |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks | $ | (738) | | | $ | (2,026) | | | $ | 1,994 | |
Two primary drivers that can impact net operating cash flows are fluctuations in net income and net change in derivatives and hedging activities. The Bank recorded a net positive change of $1.1 billion in derivative and hedging activities for 2022 compared to a net positive change of $673 million in derivative and hedging activities in 2021. The change in derivative and hedging activities was primarily driven by the change in interest rates.
Net cash provided by investing activities fluctuate primarily based on advances and investing activities. The Bank originated $381.3 billion of advances and collected $315.8 billion of advances principal in 2022 compared to $82.1 billion and $87.9 billion, respectively, in 2021. The Bank purchased investment securities of $11.2 billion and received proceeds from principal collected of $3.4 billion in 2022 compared to $3.2 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively, in 2021. The Bank recorded a net change of negative $3.4 billion related to liquid investments in 2022 compared to a net change of positive $424 million in 2021.
Net cash used in financing activities fluctuate primarily based on the issuance and payments for maturing and retiring consolidated obligations. The Bank issued $876.4 billion in consolidated obligations upand paid $804.6 billion for maturing and retiring consolidated obligations in 2022, compared to an aggregate amount$635.0 billion and $647.7 billion, respectively, in 2021.
Anticipated Cash Expenditures
The following table presents the payment due date or expiration terms of $4.0 billion. No borrowings under this authority have been outstanding since 1977.the Bank’s significant anticipated cash expenditures as of December 31, 2022 (in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One year or less | | After one year
through three years | | After three years through
five years | | After five years | | Total |
Consolidated obligations(1) | $ | 102,413 | | | $ | 24,196 | | | $ | 14,836 | | | $ | 2,761 | | | $ | 144,206 | |
Pension and post-retirement contributions(2) | 3 | | | 4 | | | 10 | | 11 | | 28 |
| Total | $ | 102,416 | | | $ | 24,200 | | | $ | 14,846 | | | $ | 2,772 | | | $ | 144,234 | |
____________(1) Does not include contractual interest payments related to bonds. Total is based on contractual maturities; the actual timing of payments could be impacted by factors affecting redemption.
(2) Includes future funding contributions for the qualified pension plan and scheduled benefit payments for the nonqualified defined benefit plans and postretirement health benefit plan.
contractual obligations listed in the above table.
Off-balance Sheet Commitments
The Bank’s primary off-balance sheet commitments are as follows:
•the Bank’s joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations; and
•the Bank’s outstanding commitments arising from standby letters of credit.
Should an FHLBank be unable to satisfy its payment obligation under a consolidated obligation for which it is the primary obligor, any of the other FHLBanks, including the Bank, could be called upon to repay all or any part of such payment obligation, as determined or approved by the Finance Agency. As of December 31, 2020,2022, none of the other FHLBanks
defaulted on their consolidated obligations; the Finance Agency was not required to allocate any obligation among the FHLBanks; and no amount of the joint and several obligation was fixed. Accordingly, the Bank has not recognized a liability for its joint and several obligations related to other FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the FHLBanks had $746.8$1,181.7 billion in aggregate par value of consolidated obligations issued and outstanding, $84.7$144.2 billion of which was attributable to the Bank. No FHLBank has ever defaulted on its principal or interest payments under any consolidated obligation, and the Bank has never been required to make payments under any consolidated obligation as a result of the failure of another FHLBank to meet its obligations.
The Bank generally requires standby letters of credit to contain language permitting the Bank, upon annual renewal dates and prior notice to the beneficiary, to choose not to renew the standby letter of credit, which effectively terminates the standby letter of credit prior to its scheduled final expiration date. Based on the creditworthiness of the member applicant and appropriate additional fees, the Bank may issue standby letters of credit that have terms of longer than one year without annual renewals or that have no stated maturity and are subject to renewal on an annual basis.
Commitments to extend credit, including standby letters of credit, are agreements to lend. The Bank issues a standby letter of credit on behalf of a member in exchange for a fee. A member may use these standby letters of credit to facilitate a financing arrangement. Management regularly reviews its standby letter of credit pricing in light of several factors, including the Bank’s potential liquidity needs related to draws on its standby letters of credit. Based on management’s credit analyses and collateral requirements, the Bank doesdid not deem it necessary to have an allowance for credit losses for these unfunded standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2020.2022.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents the payment due dates or expiration terms of the Bank’s long-term contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2020 (in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One year or less | | After one year
through three years | | After three years
through five years | | After five years | | Total |
Consolidated obligations bonds(1) | $ | 43,788 | | | $ | 11,545 | | | $ | 2,809 | | | $ | 1,190 | | | $ | 59,332 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Pension and post-retirement contributions(2) | 23 | | | 22 | | | 11 | | | 10 | | | 66 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating leases | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Total | $ | 43,812 | | | $ | 11,568 | | | $ | 2,820 | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 59,400 | |
____________
(1) Does not include discount notes and contractual interest payments related to bonds. Total is based on contractual maturities; the actual timing of payments could be impacted by factors affecting redemption.
(2) Includes future funding contribution for the qualified pension plan and scheduled benefit payments for the nonqualified defined benefit plans.
Refer to the respective footnotes in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information on each of the contractual obligations and commitments listed in the above table.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Bank’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments and assumptions that affect the Bank’s reported results and disclosures. Several of the Bank’s accounting policies are inherently subject to valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments and are more critical than others to the Bank’s results. The Bank considers fair value measurements and derivatives and hedging activities to be critical accounting policies because they require management’s subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Management bases its judgments and estimates on current market conditions and industry practices, historical experience, changes in the business environment and other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions.
Fair Value Measurements
The Bank carries certain assets and liabilities, including investments classified as trading and available-for-sale and all derivatives, on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, representing an exit price.
Fair values play an important role in the valuation of certain assets, liabilities, and hedging transactions of the Bank. Fair values are based on quoted market prices or market-based prices, if such prices are available, even in situations in which trading volume may be low when compared with prior periods. If quoted market prices or market-based prices are not available, the Bank determines fair values based on valuation models that use discounted cash flows, using market estimates of interest rates and volatility.
Valuation models and their underlying assumptions are based on the best estimates of the Bank’s management with respect to:
•market indices (primarily LIBOR, SOFR and the OIS curve);
•discount rates;
•prepayments;
•market volatility; and
•other factors, including default and loss rates.
These assumptions, particularly estimates of market indices and discount rates, may have a significant effect on the reported fair values of assets and liabilities, including derivatives, and the income and expense related thereto. The use of different assumptions, as well as changes in market conditions, could result in a materially different net income and retained earnings. The assumptions used in the models are corroborated by and independently verified against market observable data where possible.
The Bank categorizes its financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level classification in accordance with GAAP. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency (observable or unobservable) of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Bank’s market assumptions. The Bank utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
Refer to Note 1614—Estimated Fair Values to the Bank’s 20202022 audited financial statements for further discussion regarding how the Bank measures financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
General
The Bank records all derivatives at fair value on the balance sheet with changes in fair value recognized in current-period earnings. The Bank designates derivatives as either fair-value hedging instruments or non-qualifying hedging instruments for which hedge accounting is not applied. The Bank has not entered into any cash-flow hedges as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. The Bank uses derivatives in its risk management program for the following purposes:
•conversion of a fixed rate to a variable rate;
•conversion of a variable rate with a fixed component to another variable rate; and
•macro hedging of balance sheet risks.
To qualify for hedge accounting, the Bank documents the following concurrently with the execution of each hedging relationship:
•the hedging strategy;
•identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged item;
•determination of the appropriate accounting designation;
•the method used for the determination of effectiveness for transactions qualifying for hedge accounting; and
•the method for recording ineffectiveness for hedging relationships.
The Bank also evaluates each debt issuance, advance made, and financial instrument purchased to determine whether the cash item contains embedded derivatives that meet the criteria for bifurcation. If, after evaluation, it is determined that an embedded derivative must be bifurcated, the Bank will measure the fair value of the embedded derivative.
Assessment of Hedge Effectiveness
An assessment must be made to determine the effectiveness of qualifying hedging relationships. To make such an assessment, the Bank may use either uses (1) the short-cut method; or (2) the long-haul method.
If the hedging instrument is a swap and meets specific criteria, the hedging relationship may qualify for the short-cut method of assessing effectiveness. The short-cut method allows for an assumption of no ineffectiveness, which means that the change in the fair value of the hedged item is assumed to be equal and offsetting to the change in fair value of the hedging instrument. For periods beginning after May 31, 2005, theThe Bank determined that it would no longerdoes not apply the short-cut method to new hedging relationships.
The long-haul method of effectiveness is used to assess effectiveness for hedging relationships that qualify for hedge accounting but do not meet the criteria for the use of the short-cut method. The long-haul method requires separate valuations
of both the hedged item and the hedging instrument. If the hedging relationship is determined to be highly effective, the change in fair value of the hedged item related to the designated risk is recognized in earnings together and in the same income statement line item with the change in fair value of the hedging instrument. If the hedging relationship is determined not to be highly effective, hedge accounting will either not be allowed or cease at that point. The Bank performs effectiveness testing on a monthly basis and uses statistical regression analysis techniques to determine whether a long-haul hedging relationship is highly effective.
Accounting for Ineffectiveness and Hedge De-designation
The Bank accounts for any ineffectiveness for all long-haul fair-value hedges using the dollar offset method. In the case of non-qualifying hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the Bank reports only the change in the fair value of the derivative. Both the net interest on the derivative and the fair value adjustments of a non-qualifying hedge are recorded in noninterest income (loss) as “Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities” on the Statements of Income. Beginning January 1, 2019, the Bank adopted new hedge accounting guidance, which, among other things, impacts the presentation of gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that are effective as, and that are designated and qualify as, a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk (including changes that reflect losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2019, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedged item) was recorded in noninterest income (loss) as “Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” on the Statements of Income.
The Bank may discontinue hedge accounting for a hedging transaction (de-designation) if it fails effectiveness testing or for other asset-liability-management reasons. The Bank also treats modifications to hedged items as a discontinuance of a hedging relationship. When a hedging relationship is discontinued, the Bank will cease marking the hedged item to fair value and will amortize the cumulative basis adjustment resulting from hedge accounting. The Bank reports related amortization as interest income or expense over the remaining life of the associated hedged item. The associated derivative will continue to be marked to fair value through earnings until it matures or is terminated.
Recently Issued andBut Not Yet Adopted Accounting GuidanceStandards
See Note 3—3—Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance to the Bank’s 20202022 audited financial statements for a discussion of recently issued andbut not yet adopted accounting guidance.standards.
Legislative and Regulatory Developments
The legislative and regulatory environment in which the Bank and its members operate continues to evolve as a result of regulations enacted pursuant to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act and the Dodd-Frank Act. The Bank’s business operations, funding costs, rights, obligations, and/or the environment in which the Bank carries out its housing finance and community lending mission are likely to continue to be significantly impacted by these changes. Significant regulatory actions and developments for the period covered by this report are summarized below.
Finance Agency FinalProposed SEC Rule on FHLBank Housing Goals Amendments. Climate-related Disclosures. On June 25, 2020,March 21, 2022, the Finance Agency publishedSEC proposed a new rule that would require the Bank to make specific climate-related disclosures in its periodic reports. The proposed rule would require the Bank to account for and disclose certain direct, indirect and third-party greenhouse gas emissions, provide additional disclosures of material impact of climate-change risks on its strategy, business model and outlook, disclose climate-event impacts, discuss board and management governance and oversight of climate-related risks, climate-change risk management framework considering both physical and transitional risks, and plans to reduce such risks, and provide and discuss climate-related financial impact metrics and expenditure metrics. The Bank is unable to predict when a rule will be finalized and the extent to which a final rule effective August 24, 2020, amendingwill apply or deviate from the FHLBank housing goals regulation. Enforcementproposal. Should the rule become final in its current form, the Bank anticipates a significant increase in its compliance costs given the complexity of the final rule will phase in over three years. The final rule replaces the four existing retrospective housing goals with a singlethese prospective mortgage purchase housing goal target in which 20 percent of Acquired Member Asset (AMA) mortgages purchased in a year must be comprised of loans to low-income or very low-income families, or to families in low-income areas. The final rule also establishes a separate small member participation housing goal with a target level in which 50 percent of the members selling AMA loans in a calendar year must be small members. The final rule provides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of the goals. The final rule also establishes that housing goals apply to each FHLBank that acquires any AMA mortgages during a year, eliminating the existing $2.5 billion volume threshold that previously triggered the application of housing goals for each FHLBank.obligations.
The Bank does not expect these changes to have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.
Finance Agency’s Planned Review and Analysis of the FHLBank System. On July 20, 2022, Finance Agency Final RuleDirector Sandra L. Thompson provided testimony to the U.S. House Committee on Stress Testing. On March 24, 2020,Financial Services, indicating that the Finance Agency publishedwould conduct a final rule, effective upon issuance, to amend its stress testing rule, consistent with section 401review and analysis of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,FHLBank System. As part of its review and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (EGRRCPA). The final rule (i) raises the minimum threshold for entities regulated byanalysis, the Finance Agency to conduct periodic stress testshas held a series of public listening sessions and regional roundtable discussions, and has requested written comments from $10 billion to $250 billion or morestakeholders. The review has been examining matters covering such areas as the FHLBanks’ adequate fulfillment of their mission and purpose in total consolidated assets; (ii) removesa changing marketplace; their organization, operational efficiency and effectiveness; their role in promoting affordable, sustainable, equitable, and resilient housing and community investment; their role in addressing the requirements for FHLBanks to conduct stress testing;unique needs of rural and (iii) removes the adverse scenario from the list of required scenarios. FHLBanks are currently excluded from this regulation because no FHLBank has total consolidated assets over $250 billion, but the Finance Agency reserved its discretion to require an FHLBank with total consolidated assets below the $250 billion threshold to conduct stress testing. These amendments alignfinancially vulnerable communities; member products, services, collateral requirements; and membership eligibility and requirements. The Bank anticipates that the Finance Agency’s stress testing rulereview and analysis will culminate in a written report. The report may involve recommendations for changes related to a number of areas such as the FHLBanks’ fulfillment of their mission, membership requirements, contributions to affordable housing and support to community investment and may lead to recommendations for statutory revisions, proposals for new or modified regulations, regulatory guidance under existing regulations, and/or other regulatory or supervisory actions consistent with rules adopted by other financial institution regulators that implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) stress testing requirements, as amended by EGRRCPA.Finance Agency’s statutory authority.
This rule eliminates these stress testing requirements for the Bank, unless the FinanceAmendment to FINRA Rule 4210: Margining of Covered Agency exercises its discretion to require stress testing in the future.
Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities. Transactions.On July 1, 2020,29, 2022, the OfficeFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) amended FINRA Rule 4210, extending the implementation date of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve Board (Federal Reserve), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Farm Credit Administration, and the Finance Agency (collectively, Prudential Banking Regulators) jointly published a final rule, effective August 31, 2020, amending regulations that established minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared swaps for covered swap entities under the jurisdiction of the Prudential Banking Regulators (Prudential Margin Rules). In addition to other changes, the final rule: (1) allows swaps entered into by a covered swap entity prior to an applicable compliance date to retain their legacy status and not become subject to the Prudential Margin Rules in the event that the legacy swaps are amended to replace an interbank offered rate (such as LIBOR) or other discontinued rate, or due to other technical amendments, notional reductions or portfolio compression exercises; (2) introduces a new Phase 6 compliance date for initial marginmargining requirements for covered swap entities and their counterparties with an average daily aggregate notional amount (AANA) of uncleared swaps of at least $8 billion; and (3) clarifies that initial margin (IM) trading documentation does not need to be executed prior toagency transactions from October 26, 2022 until April 24, 2023. On February 24, 2023, the parties becoming obligated to exchange IM.
OnIndustry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) further extended such implementation date from April 24, 2023 to October 25, 2023. Once the same date,margining requirements are effective, the Prudential Banking Regulators published an interim final rule, effective September 1, 2020, extending the IM compliance date for Phase 6 counterpartiesBank may be required to September 1, 2022. On November 9, 2020, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published a final rule extending the IM compliance date for Phase 6 counterparties to September 1, 2022, thereby aligning with the Prudential Banking Regulators.
Further, on January 5, 2021, the CFTC published a final rule, effective February 4, 2021,collateralize transactions that primarily amends the minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared swaps under the jurisdiction of the CFTC (CFTC Margin Rules) by requiringare covered entities to use a revised AANA calculation starting on September 1, 2022. The amendments, among other things, require entities subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction to calculate the AANA for uncleared swaps during March, April and May of the current year, based on an average of month-end dates, as opposed to the previous requirementagency transactions, which required the calculation of AANA during June, July and August of the prior year, based on daily calculations. Parties would continueinclude to be expected to exchange IM based on the AANA totals as of September 1 of the current year. These amendments align with the recommendation of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. Separately, on January 25, 2021, the CFTC published a final rule, effective February 24, 2021, that amends the CFTC Margin Rules to permit, among other changes, covered swap entities to maintain separate minimum transfer amounts (MTA) for IM and variation margin for each swap counterparty, provided the combined MTA does not exceed $500,000.
The Bank doesnot expect these rules to have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.
FDIC Brokered Deposits Restrictions. On January 22, 2021, the FDIC published a final rule, effective April 1, 2021, that amends its brokered deposits regulations that apply to less than well-capitalized insured depository institutions. The FDIC stated that the amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations and they establish a new framework for analyzing the deposit broker definition, which determines whether deposits placed through deposit placement arrangements qualify as brokered deposits. These deposit placement arrangements include those between insured depository institutions and third parties, such as financial technology companies, for a variety of business purposes, including access to deposits. The amendments to the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations, among other things, clarify what it means to be engaged in the business of facilitating the placement of deposits and expand the scope of the primary purpose exception. The rule amendments are expected to have the effect of narrowing the definition of deposit broker and excluding more deposits from treatment as brokered deposits. The amendments also establish an application and reporting process with respect to the primary purpose exception for businesses that do not meet one of several bright-line tests, and they affirm the FDIC’s position that the brokering of certificates of deposit constitutes deposit brokering.
This rule may have an effect on member demand for certain advances, but the Bank cannot predict the extent of the impact.announced transactions (TBAs). The Bank does not expect this rule to have a material effect on the Bank’sits financial condition or results of operations.
Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2020-01Final Rule Implementing the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act. On December 16, 2022, the Federal Home Loan Bank Risk ManagementReserve Board of AMA Risk Management.On January 31, 2020,Governors adopted a final rule that implements the Finance Agency released guidanceAdjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022. The rule, which went into effect on risk management of AMA. The guidance communicatesFebruary 27, 2023, establishes benchmark replacement rates based on SOFR for certain contracts, to apply after June 30, 2023 (the “LIBOR replacement date”). Generally, the Finance Agency’s expectations with respect to an FHLBank’s funding of its members through the purchase of eligible mortgage loans and includes expectations that an FHLBank will have board-established limits on AMA portfolios and management-established thresholds to serve as monitoring tools to manage AMA-related risk exposure. The guidancerule provides that Board-selected benchmark replacements will apply by operation of law to contracts governed by U.S. law which have the boardfollowing characteristics: (a) contain no fallback provisions; (b) contain fallback provisions but fail to specify either the fallback rate or the party that can determine the fallback rate; or (c) contain a fallback provision that identifies the party that can determine the fallback rate, but the determining party has failed to do so before (i) the LIBOR replacement date or (ii) the latest date to select a benchmark replacement according to the contract terms. For FHLBank advances, which have any of an FHLBank should ensure that the bank serves above characteristics, the final rule sets the replacement benchmark rate as a liquidity source for members, and an FHLBank should ensure that its portfolio limits do not resultthe Fallback Rate (SOFR) in the FHLBank’s acquisition of mortgages from smaller members being “crowded out” byISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol. For any other FHLBank contract with the acquisition of mortgages from larger members. The advisory bulletin containsabove characteristics, references to overnight LIBOR would be replaced with SOFR and one-, three-, six, or 12-month LIBOR will be replaced with 30-day Average SOFR, in each case, plus the expectation that the board of an FHLBank should set limits on the size and growth of portfolios and on acquisitions from a single participating financial institution. In addition, the guidance provides that the board of an FHLBank should consider concentration riskapplicable tenor spread adjustment specified in the areas of geographic area, high-balance loans, and in third-party loan originations.
LIBOR Act. The Bank does not expect this rule to have a material effect on the Bank’sits financial condition or results of operations.
LIBOR Transition
Finance Agency Supervisory Letter - Planning for LIBOR Phase-Out. On September 27, 2019, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter (LIBOR Supervisory Letter) to the FHLBanks that the Finance Agency stated is designed to ensure the FHLBanks will be able to identify and prudently manage the risks associated with the termination of LIBOR in a safe and sound manner. The LIBOR Supervisory Letter provided that the FHLBanks should, by March 31, 2020, cease entering into new LIBOR referenced financial assets, liabilities, and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021 for all product types except investments. With respect to investments, the FHLBanks were required, by December 31, 2019, to stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. These phase-out dates did not apply to collateral accepted by the FHLBanks. The LIBOR Supervisory Letter also directed the FHLBanks to update their pledged collateral
certification reporting requirements by March 31, 2020, in an effort to encourage members to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral maturing after December 31, 2021.
As a result of the market volatility experienced during 2020 due in part by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Finance Agency extended the FHLBanks’ authority to enter into LIBOR-based instruments that mature after December 31, 2021 from March 31, 2020 to June 30, 2020, except for investments and option embedded products. In addition, the Finance Agency extended the requirement to update pledged collateral certification reporting requirements from March 31, 2020, to September 30, 2020.
The Bank continues to evaluate the potential impact of the LIBOR Supervisory Letter and the related subsequent guidance on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations, but the Bank has begun changing its investment and hedging strategy and, may experience lower overall demand or increased costs for its advances, which in turn may negatively impact the future composition of the Bank’s balance sheet, capital stock levels, core mission asset ratio, net income and dividend.
LIBOR Transition – ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol and Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions. On October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), published a Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol). Both the Supplement and the Protocol took effect on January 25, 2021. On that date, all legacy bilateral derivative transactions subject to Protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference a covered Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR), including U.S. Dollar LIBOR, were effectively amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation. Both the Bank and its counterparty must have adhered to the Protocol in order to effectively amend legacy derivative contracts, otherwise the parties must bilaterally amend legacy covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) to address LIBOR fallbacks. The Protocol will remain open for adherence after the effective date. As of January 25, 2021, all new derivative contracts are subject to the relevant IBOR fallbacks set forth in the Supplement.
On October 21, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter to the FHLBanks that required each FHLBank to adhere to the Protocol by December 31, 2020, and to the extent necessary, to amend any bilateral agreements regarding the adoption of the Protocol by December 15, 2020.
The Bank adhered to the Protocol as of October 23, 2020, and all of the Bank’s counterparties have adhered to the Protocol. For a discussion of the potential impact of the LIBOR transition, refer to Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Management — Transition of LIBOR to an Alternative Reference Rate and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
COVID-19 Developments
Finance Agency Supervisory Letter – Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans as Collateral for FHLBank Advances. On April 23, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter (PPP Supervisory Letter) permitting the FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral for advances as “Agency Securities,” given the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 100 percent guarantee of the unpaid principal balance. On April 20, 2020, the SBA published its third interim final rule related to PPP loans, which explicitly waived certain regulatory requirements that must be satisfied before a member could pledge PPP loans to the FHLBanks as collateral. The PPP Supervisory Letter establishes a series of conditions under which the FHLBanks may accept PPP loans as collateral, which conditions focus on the financial condition of members, collateral discounts, and pledge dollar limits.
On December 27, 2020, the President signed into law an extension of the PPP until March 31, 2021. The April 23, 2020 Supervisory Letter from the Finance Agency allowing FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral remains in effect.
CARES Act
The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The $2.2 trillion package was the largest stimulus bill in U.S. history. The CARES Act is in addition to previous relief legislation passed by Congress in March 2020. The legislation provides the following:
•assistance to businesses, states, and municipalities;
•creates a loan program for small businesses, non-profits and physician practices that can be forgiven through employee retention incentives;
•provides the Treasury Secretary authority to make loans or loan guarantees to states, municipalities, and eligible businesses and loosens some regulations imposed through the Dodd-Frank Act;
•direct payments to eligible taxpayers and their families;
•expands eligibility for unemployment insurance and payment amounts; and
•includes mortgage forbearance provisions and a foreclosure moratorium.
Funding for the PPP, which was created by the CARES Act, was increased with the enactment of subsequent laws, most recently by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 27, 2020. While some provisions of the CARES Act have expired, others have been extended by regulatory and legislative action. Additional phases of the CARES Act or other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation may be enacted by Congress. The Bank continue to evaluate the potential impact of such legislation on its business, including its continued impact to the U.S. economy; impacts to mortgages held or serviced by the Bank’s members and that the Bank accept as collateral; and the impacts on the Bank’s MPP and MPF program.
Additional COVD-19 Presidential, Legislative and Regulatory Developments. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden (and before him, President Trump), through executive orders, governmental agencies, including the SEC, OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, CFTC and the Finance Agency, as well as state governments and agencies, have taken, and may continue to take, actions to provide various forms of relief from, and guidance regarding, the financial, operational, credit, market, and other effects of the pandemic, some of which may have a direct or indirect impact on us or the Bank’s members. Many of these actions are temporary in nature. The Bank continues to monitor these actions and guidance as they evolve and to evaluate their potential impact on the Bank.
Risk Management
The Bank’s lending, investment and funding activities, and use of derivative hedge instruments expose the Bank to a number of risks. A robust risk management framework aligns risk-taking activities with the Bank’s strategies and risk appetite. A risk management framework also balances risks and rewards. The Bank’s risk management framework consists of risk governance, risk appetite, and risk management policies.
The Bank’s board of directors and management recognize that risks are inherent to the Bank’s business model and that the process of establishing a risk appetite does not imply that the Bank seeks to mitigate or eliminate all risk. By defining and managing to a specific risk appetite, the board of directors and management ensure that there is a common understanding of the Bank’s desired risk profile, which enhances strategic and tactical decisions. Additionally, the Bank aspires to (1) sustain a corporate culture of transparency, integrity, and adherence to legal and ethical obligations;obligations: and (2) achieve and exceed best practices in governance, ethics, and compliance.
The Bank’s board of directors and management have established a risk appetite statement and risk metrics for controlling and escalating actions based on the following eight continuing objectives in 20202022 that represent the foundation of the Bank’s strategic and tactical planning:
•Capital Adequacy - maintain adequate levels of capital components (retained earnings and capital stock) that protect against the risks inherent onin the Bank’s balance sheetbusiness activities and provide sufficient resiliency to withstand potential stressed losses.
•Market Risk/Earnings - maintain an adequate ROE spread to average three-month LIBOR,produce a competitive return on equity, while providing attractive funding for advance products, consistent payment of dividends, reliable access to funding, and maintenance of retained earnings in excess of stressed retained earnings targets within a conservative risk management framework.
•Liquidity Risk - maintain sufficient liquidity and funding sources to allow the Bank to meet expected and unexpected obligations.
•Credit and Concentration Risk - avoid credit losses by managing credit and collateral risk exposures within acceptable parameters. Achieve this objective through data-driven analysis and counterparty-specific analysis (and when appropriate, perform shareholder-specific analysis), monitoring and verification, including new collateral policy expansions to ensure appropriate controls and that monitoring is consistent with managing existing credit and collateral risk exposures. Monitor through enhanced reporting any elevated risk concentrations, and when appropriate, manage and mitigate the increased risk.
•Governance/Compliance/Legal - compliancecomply fully with all applicable laws and regulations and manage otherall legal exposures.risk effectively and efficiently.
•Mission/Business Model - (1) deliver financial services and consistent access to affordable funds that arein the size, cost and structure shareholders desire, helping them to manage risk and extend credit in their communities, while achieving the
Bank’s affordable housing mission goals;goals and (2) provide value through the consistent payment of dividends and the repurchasing of excess stock.
•Operational Risk -(1) deliver an employee value proposition that allows the Bank to attract, retain, engage and develop staff to meet the evolving needs of our key stakeholders and effectively manage enterprise-wide risks. Manage the key risks associated with operational availability and resiliency of critical systems and services, the integrity and security of the Bank’sBank's information, and the alignment of technology investment with key business objectives through enterprise-wide risk management practices and governance based on industry standards; (2) deliver an employee value proposition that allows the Bank to build, retain, engage, and develop staff to meet the evolving needs of the Bank’s key stakeholders and effectively manage enterprise-wide risks; and (3) managestandards. Manage the key risks associated with cyber security threats.
•Reputation - recognize the importance of and advance positive awareness and perception of the Bank and its mission among key external stakeholders impacting the Bank’s ability to achieve its mission.
The board and management recognize that risk and risk producing events are dynamic and constantly being presented.ever-present. Accordingly, the Bank believes that reporting, analyzing and mitigating risks are paramount to successful corporate governance.
The RMPRisk Management Policy (RMP) also governs the Bank’s approach to managing the above risks. The Bank’s board of directors reviews the RMP annually and approves amendments to the RMP from time to time as necessary. To promote compliance with the RMP, the Bank has established internal management committees to provide oversight of these risks. The Bank produces a comprehensive risk assessment report on an annual basis that is reviewed by the board of directors. In addition to the established risk appetite and the RMP, the Bank is also subject to Finance Agency regulations and policies regarding risk management.
Transition of LIBOR to an Alternative Reference Rate
In July 2017,Pursuant to the March 5, 2021 United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021 it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. In response, the Federal Reserve Board(FCA) announcement, 1-week and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee to identify a set of alternative reference interest rates for possible use as market benchmarks. This committee has proposed SOFR as its recommended alternative to2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR ceased being provided by its administrator on December 31, 2021 and the Federal Reserve Bankremaining U.S. dollar LIBOR settings will cease being provided by an administrator or no longer be representative immediately after June 30, 2023. Although the FCA does not expect the remaining LIBOR tenors to become unrepresentative before June 30, 2023, there is no assurance that LIBOR, of New York began publishing SOFR rates in the second quarter of 2018. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intendedany particular currency or tenor, will continue to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities.published or be representative through any particular date.
Certain of the Bank’s assets and liabilities, and certain collateral pledged to the Bank, are indexed to LIBOR, with exposure extending past December 31, 2021.June 30, 2023. The Bank is currently evaluatingcontinues to evaluate and planningplan for the eventual replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including the probability of SOFR as the dominant replacement. replacement in the capital markets. On July 1, 2021, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter to the FHLBanks regarding its expectations regarding an FHLBank’s use of alternative rates other than SOFR. The Supervisory Letter provides guidance on considerations, such as volume of underlying transactions, credit sensitivity, modeling risk and others, that an FHLBank should take into account prior to employing an alternative reference rate.
In general, the transition away from LIBOR may result inpresent increased market risk, credit risk, operational risk and business risk for the Bank. The Bank has adopted a LIBOR transition plan, which outlines the Bank’s transition activities, including LIBOR exposure evaluation, risk management, legal, operational, systems and operations, shareholder and external communication and education, and other aspects of planning. The Bank has a LIBOR Steering Committee, which oversees the Bank’s transition away from LIBOR in accordance with the strategies and requirements put forth by senior management and regulatory guidance, providing periodic reports to the Bank’s executive management committee and board of directors.
As of December 31, 2019, the Bank ceased purchasing assets tied to LIBOR with a contractual maturity beyond December 31, 2021. In addition, beginning June 30, 2020, the Bank ceased entering into new LIBOR-based transactions involving advances, debt, derivatives, or other products with maturities beyond December 31, 2021. In preparation for this change and to help manage balance sheet exposure to LIBOR-indexed assets and liabilities with maturities beyond 2021, the Bank has begun updating its systems, participating in the issuance of SOFR-indexed consolidated bonds, issuing SOFR-linked advances, and swapping certain financial instruments to OIS and SOFR as an alternative interest rate hedging strategy for certain financial instruments. The pace of transition, however, is dependent on external factors, including market developments and demand. The Bank closely monitors and participates in industry activity related to LIBOR transition, including those of the Alternate Reference Rate Committee, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), and the derivative Clearinghouses. In October 2020, the Bank participated in the LCH Ltd. and CME Clearinghouses’ transition to SOFR discounting for cleared derivatives.
As part of the Bank’s risk LIBOR exposure evaluation and risk management, the Bank has developed an inventory of financial instruments impacted by the LIBOR transition and has worked to identify and update contracts that may require adding or adjusting the fallback language. The Bank has added or adjusted fallback language in all outstanding LIBOR-linked advance confirmations consolidated obligations and its credit and collateral policy to include fallback language addressing the discontinuation of LIBOR as a
benchmark rate. TheFurther, the Bank continuesand each of its counterparties has adhered to monitor the market-wide efforts to address fallback language related to derivatives and cash products. On October 23, 2020, ISDA launched the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the ISDA 2020 IBORLIBOR Fallbacks Protocol. The supplement and the amendments madeThis adherence by the protocol took effect on January 25, 2021. On that date,Bank and its counterparties amended all of the Bank’s legacy bilateral LIBOR-based derivative transactions subject to protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference covered IBORs, including US Dollar LIBOR, were amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBORLIBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’sLIBOR’s cessation. BothLIBOR-based agency MBS investment portfolio (i.e.: MBS securities with guaranteed principal and interest to be paid by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) will transition under rules established by the Bank and its relevant counterparty must have adheredFederal Reserve pursuant to the protocol in order to effectively amend legacy derivative contracts, otherwise the parties must bilaterally agree to include amended legacy contracts to address LIBOR fallbacks. The Bank has adhered to the protocoltransition legislation, as announced by Fannie Mae and as of the date of this Report, all of the Bank’s counterparties have also adhered to the protocol, covering all of the Bank’s portfolio of LIBOR-based uncleared derivatives that terminate after December 31, 2021.
The Bank updated its pledged collateral certification reporting requirements as of September 30, 2020 so that members may distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral maturing past December 31, 2021. The Bank intends to utilize this information in connection with its LIBOR exposure evaluation and risk management.
On December 4, 2020, the administrator of LIBOR issued a consultation on its intention to continue the publication of U.S. LIBOR rates for some tenors until June 30, 2023.Freddie Mac. The Bank continues to monitor these developments with respect to the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, the respective Federal Reserve Regulations that set
fallback provisions that will become effective on February 27, 2023 and will evaluate any changes to its transition planning.impact on the fallback language contained in the Bank’s remaining LIBOR exposure, including its investment portfolio.
The Bank has LIBOR exposure related to advances, investment securities, consolidated obligation bonds, and derivatives. The following tables present the Bank’s LIBOR-indexed variable-rate financial instruments and interest-rate swaps with LIBOR exposure (in millions).
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | | | | As of December 31, 2022 | |
| | Due/Terminates before or | | Due/Terminates after | | | | | Due/Terminates through | | Due/Terminates | | |
| | on December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2021 | | Total | | | | June 30, 2023 | | thereafter | | Total | |
| Assets with LIBOR exposure | Assets with LIBOR exposure | | | | | | | Assets with LIBOR exposure | | | | | | | |
Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | $ | 5,349 | | | $ | 1,742 | | | $ | 7,091 | | | Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 10 | | |
| Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount) | | | |
| Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount): | | Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount): | | | |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities | Non-mortgage-backed securities | 160 | | 900 | | 1,060 | | Non-mortgage-backed securities | | — | | 465 | | | 465 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | Mortgage-backed securities | 19 | | 15,611 | | 15,630 | | Mortgage-backed securities | | 10 | | 8,451 | | 8,461 | |
| Total investment securities | Total investment securities | 179 | | 16,511 | | 16,690 | | Total investment securities | | 10 | | 8,916 | | 8,926 | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg) | | | | | | | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg): | | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg): | | | | | | | |
| Cleared | Cleared | 1,647 | | 8,253 | | 9,900 | | Cleared | | 79 | | — | | 79 | |
| Uncleared | Uncleared | 99 | | 3,930 | | 4,029 | | Uncleared | | 22 | | 5 | | 27 | |
| Total interest-rate swaps | Total interest-rate swaps | 1,746 | | 12,183 | | 13,929 | | Total interest-rate swaps | | 101 | | 5 | | 106 | |
| Total principal/notional amount | Total principal/notional amount | $ | 7,274 | | | $ | 30,436 | | | $ | 37,710 | | | Total principal/notional amount | | $ | 116 | | | $ | 8,926 | | | $ | 9,042 | | |
| | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | | | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | | | |
| Consolidated bonds by contractual maturity (principal amount) | $ | 10,575 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,575 | | | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg) | | | |
| | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg): | | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg): | | | |
| Cleared | Cleared | 520 | | 263 | | 783 | | Cleared | | $ | 71 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 71 | | |
| Uncleared | 173 | | 113 | | 286 | | |
| Total interest-rate swaps | 693 | | 376 | | 1,069 | | |
| Total principal/notional amount | $ | 11,268 | | | $ | 376 | | | $ | 11,644 | | | |
| | ____________ | ____________ | | | | | | | ____________ | | | |
(1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. | | |
(1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. The LIBOR exposure on the $5 million advance that matures after June 30, 2023, is related to a cap. The last reset date for this advance is prior to June 30, 2023. | | (1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. The LIBOR exposure on the $5 million advance that matures after June 30, 2023, is related to a cap. The last reset date for this advance is prior to June 30, 2023. | |
| | | As of December 31, 2019 | | | As of December 31, 2021 |
| | Due/Terminates before or | | Due/Terminates after | | | | | Due/Terminates in | | Due/Terminates through | | Due/Terminates | |
| | on December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2021 | | Total | | | | 2022 | | June 30, 2023 | | thereafter | | Total |
| Assets with LIBOR exposure | Assets with LIBOR exposure | | | | | | Assets with LIBOR exposure | | | | | | | | | |
Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | $ | 24,828 | | | $ | 2,334 | | | $ | 27,162 | | Advance by redemption term (principal amount) (1) | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 830 | | | $ | 891 | |
| Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount) | | |
| Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount): | | Investment securities by contractual maturity (principal amount): | | |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities | Non-mortgage-backed securities | 1,312 | | | 900 | | | 2,212 | | Non-mortgage-backed securities | | | 435 | | | — | | 465 | | 900 |
| Mortgage-backed securities | Mortgage-backed securities | 20 | | | 20,631 | | | 20,651 | | Mortgage-backed securities | | | — | | | 23 | | 10,994 | | 11,017 |
| Total investment securities | Total investment securities | 1,332 | | | 21,531 | | | 22,863 | | Total investment securities | | | 435 | | | 23 | | | 11,459 | | | 11,917 | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg) | | | | | | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg): | | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (receive leg): | | | | | | | | | |
| Cleared | Cleared | 9,968 | | | 11,408 | | | 21,376 | | Cleared | | | 561 | | | 338 | | 3,332 | | 4,231 |
| Uncleared | Uncleared | 265 | | | 4,901 | | | 5,166 | | Uncleared | | | 88 | | | 23 | | 2,512 | | 2,623 |
| Total interest-rate swaps | Total interest-rate swaps | 10,233 | | | 16,309 | | | 26,542 | | Total interest-rate swaps | | | 649 | | | 361 | | | 5,844 | | | 6,854 | |
| Total principal/notional amount | Total principal/notional amount | $ | 36,393 | | | $ | 40,174 | | | $ | 76,567 | | Total principal/notional amount | | | $ | 1,140 | | | $ | 389 | | | $ | 18,133 | | | $ | 19,662 | |
| | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | | Liabilities with LIBOR exposure | | |
| Consolidated bonds by contractual maturity (principal amount) | $ | 42,820 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 42,820 | | |
| LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg) | | |
| | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg): | | LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps notional amount (pay leg): | | |
| Cleared | Cleared | 12,973 | | | 263 | | | 13,236 | | Cleared | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 263 | |
| Uncleared | Uncleared | 11,578 | | | 1,980 | | | 13,558 | | Uncleared | | | 28 | | | — | | — | | 28 |
| Total interest-rate swaps | 24,551 | | | 2,243 | | | 26,794 | | |
| Total principal/notional amount | $ | 67,371 | | | $ | 2,243 | | | $ | 69,614 | | |
| | Total notional amount | | Total notional amount | | | $ | 170 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 291 | |
| ____________ | ____________ | ____________ |
(1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. | |
1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. The LIBOR exposure on the $5 million advance that matures after June 30, 2023, is related to a cap. The last reset date for this advance is prior to June 30, 2023. | | 1) Includes all fixed-rate advances that have cap/floor optionality and excludes convertible advances. The LIBOR exposure on the $5 million advance that matures after June 30, 2023, is related to a cap. The last reset date for this advance is prior to June 30, 2023. |
In addition to LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps included in the above tables, the Bank has interest-rate caps and floors with LIBOR exposure. The estimated net fair value of these interest-rate caps and floors was not material as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The following table presents the notional amount of caps and floors with LIBOR exposure (in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Terminates before or on December 31, 2021 | | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 3,084 | |
| Terminates after December 31, 2021 | | 4,000 | | | 4,000 | |
Total (1) | | $ | 7,000 | | | $ | 7,084 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Terminates after June 30, 2023 | | 4,000 | | | 4,000 | |
____________ With respect to LIBOR-linked collateral that is pledged by members to secure their advances, the Bank has adopted a transition plan for such collateral. The elements of the plan include:
• (1)Readiness to modify haircuts promptly for affected LIBOR collateral in response to changing market conditions;
•Implementation of a monitoring process for liquidity of LIBOR collateral; and
•Implementation of a communication process to inform shareholders of any changes to valuation or haircuts for LIBOR collateral.
The estimated net fair value of these interest-rate caps and floors was less than $1 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.Bank monitors risks related to LIBOR-linked collateral, including any shareholders with concentrations in LIBOR-linked pledged collateral. The Bank ceased accepting newly originated LIBOR-linked collateral on January 1, 2022.
Market Risk
General
The Bank is exposed to market risk because changes in interest rates and spreads can have a direct effect on the value of the Bank’s assets and liabilities. As a result of the volume of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest-rate risk component of market risk has the greatest impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
Interest-rate risk represents the risk that the aggregate market value or estimated fair value of the Bank’s asset, liability, and derivative portfolios will decline as a result of interest-rate volatility or that net earnings will be affected significantly by interest-rate changes. Interest-rate risk can occur in a variety of forms including repricing risk, yield-curve risk, basis risk, and option risk. The Bank faces repricing risk whenever an asset and a liability reprice at different times and with different rates, resulting in interest-margin sensitivity to changes in market interest rates. Yield-curve risk reflects the possibility that changes in the shape of the yield curve may affect the market value of the Bank’s assets and liabilities differently because a liability used to fund an asset may be short-term, while the asset is long-term, or vice versa. Basis risk occurs when yields on assets and
costs on liabilities are based on different bases, such as LIBOR or SOFR versus the Bank’s cost of funds. Different bases can move at different rates or in different directions, which can cause erratic changes in revenues and expenses. Option risk is presented by the optionality that is embedded in some assets and liabilities. Mortgage assets represent the primary source of option risk.
The primary goal of the Bank’s interest-rate risk measurement and management efforts is to control the above risks through prudent asset-liability management strategies so that the Bank may provide members with dividends that are consistently competitive with existing market interest rates on alternative short-term and variable-rate investments. The Bank attempts to manage interest-rate risk exposure by using appropriate funding instruments and hedging strategies. Hedging may occur at the micro level, for one or more specifically identified transactions, or at the macro level. Management evaluates the Bank’s macro hedge position and funding strategies on a daily basis and makes adjustments as necessary.
The Bank measures its potential market risk exposure in a number of ways. These include asset, liability, and equity duration analyses; and earnings forecast scenario analyses that reflect repricing gaps. The Bank establishes tolerance limits for these financial metrics and uses internal models to measure each of these risk exposures at least monthly.
Use of Derivatives
The Bank enters into derivatives to reduce the interest-rate risk exposure inherent in otherwise unhedged assets and funding positions and attempts to do so in the most cost-efficient manner. The Bank does not engage in speculative trading of these instruments. The Bank’s derivative positions may include interest-rate swaps, options, swaptions, interest-rate cap and floor agreements, and forward contracts. These derivatives are used to adjust the effective maturity, repricing frequency, or option characteristics of financial instruments to achieve risk-management objectives. Within its risk management strategy, the Bank uses derivative financial instruments in the following two ways:
•As a fair-value hedge of an underlying financial instrument or a firm commitment. For example, the Bank uses derivatives to reduce the interest-rate net sensitivity of consolidated obligations, advances, and investments by, in effect, converting them to a short-term interest rate. The Bank also uses derivatives to manage embedded options in assets and liabilities and to hedge the market value of existing assets and liabilities. The Bank’s management reevaluates its hedging strategies from time to time and may change the hedging techniques used or adopt new strategies as deemed prudent.
•As an asset-liability management tool, for which hedge accounting is not applied (non-qualifying hedge). The Bank may enter into derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result, the Bank recognizes the change in fair value and interest income or expense of these derivatives in the “Noninterest income (loss)” section of the Statements of Income as “Net gains (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” with no offsetting fair-value adjustments of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment. Consequently, these transactions can introduce earnings volatility.
The following table presents the notional amounts of derivative financial instruments (in millions). The category “Fair value hedges” represents hedge strategies for which hedge accounting is achieved. The category “Non-qualifying hedges” represents hedge strategies for which the derivatives are not in designated hedging relationships that formally meet the hedge accounting requirements under GAAP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, |
| | | | | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Hedged Item / Hedging Instrument | | Hedging Objective | | Hedge
Accounting
Designation | | Notional Amount | | Notional Amount |
| Advances | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (without options) | | Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges | | $ | 3,855 | | | $ | 1,909 | |
| | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (with options) | | Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | 13,418 | | | 18,420 | |
| | | | |
| Pay fixed with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (non-callable) | | Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | 333 | | | 742 | |
| Pay variable with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (non-callable) | | Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | — | | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total | | 17,606 | | | 21,079 | |
| Investments | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap | | Converts the investment’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Non-qualifying
hedges | | 100 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | | | | | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (without options) | | Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges | | 6,246 | | | 788 | |
| | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (with options) | | Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the bond. | | Fair value
hedges | | 42,412 | | | 24,473 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total | | 48,658 | | | 25,261 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes | | | | | | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap | | Converts the discount note’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges
| | 11,309 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate cap or floor | | Protects against changes in income of certain assets due to changes in interest rates. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | 4,000 | | | 4,000 | |
| Pay variable, receive fixed interest rate swap | | Interest-rate swap not linked to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | 20 | | | 20 | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap | | Interest-rate swap not linked to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | 20 | | | 20 | |
| | | | Total | | 4,040 | | | 4,040 | |
| Intermediary Positions and Other | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap, and receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap | | To offset interest-rate swaps executed with members by executing interest-rate swaps with derivatives counterparties. | | Non-qualifying
hedges | | 23 | | | 24 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total notional amount | | | | | | $ | 81,736 | | | $ | 50,404 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, |
| | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Hedged Item / Hedging Instrument | | Hedging Objective | | Hedge
Accounting
Designation | | Notional Amount | | Notional Amount |
| Advances | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (without options) | | Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges | | $ | 2,306 | | | $ | 2,382 | |
| | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (with options) | | Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | 22,501 | | | 26,442 | |
| | | | |
| Pay fixed with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (non-callable) | | Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | 558 | | | 260 | |
| Pay variable with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (non-callable) | | Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges | | 41 | | | 43 | |
| Pay variable with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (callable) | | Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance. | | Fair value
hedges
| | — | | | 650 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total | | 25,406 | | | 29,777 | |
| Investments | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap | | Converts the investment’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Non-qualifying
hedges | | 56 | | | 56 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | | | | | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (without options) | | Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges | | 1,395 | | | 14,033 | |
| | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (with options) | | Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the bond. | | Fair value
hedges | | 85 | | | 12,240 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total | | 1,480 | | | 26,273 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes | | | | | | | | |
| Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap | | Converts the discount note’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Fair value
hedges
| | 1,115 | | | 17,587 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap | | Converts the asset or liability fixed rate to a variable-rate index. | | Non-qualifying
hedges | | 20 | | | 100 | |
| Pay variable, receive variable interest rate swap | | Interest-rate swap not linked to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | 20 | | | — | |
| Interest-rate cap or floor | | Protects against changes in income of certain assets due to changes in interest rates. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | 7,000 | | | 7,000 | |
| | | | Total | | 7,040 | | | 7,100 | |
| Intermediary Positions and Other | | | | | | | | |
| Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap, and receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap | | To offset interest-rate swaps executed with members by executing interest-rate swaps with derivatives counterparties. | | Non-qualifying
hedges | | 25 | | | 323 | |
| Interest-rate cap or floor | | To offset interest-rate caps or floors executed with members by executing interest-rate caps or floors with derivatives counterparties. | | Non-qualifying hedges | | — | | | 83 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total | | 25 | | | 406 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total notional amount | | | | | | $ | 35,122 | | | $ | 81,199 | |
Interest-rate Risk Exposure Measurement
The Bank measures interest-rate risk exposure by various methods. The primary methods used are (1) calculating the effective duration of assets, liabilities, and equity under various scenarios; and (2) calculating the theoretical market value of equity. Effective duration, normally expressed in years or months, measures the price sensitivity of the Bank’s interest-bearing assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. As effective duration lengthens, market-value changes become more sensitive to interest-rate changes. The Bank employs sophisticated modeling systems to measure effective duration.
Effective duration of equity aggregates the estimated sensitivity of market value for each of the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. Effective duration of equity is computed by taking the market value-weighted effective
duration of assets, less the market value-weighted effective duration of liabilities, and dividing the remainder by the market value of equity. Market value of equity is not indicative of the market value of the Bank as a going concern or the value of the Bank in a liquidation scenario. An effective duration gap is the measure of the difference between the estimated effective durations of portfolio assets and liabilities and summarizes the extent to which the estimated cash flows for assets and liabilities are matched, on average, over time and across interest-rate scenarios.
A positive effective duration of equity or a positive effective duration gap results when the effective duration of assets is greater than the effective duration of liabilities. A negative effective duration of equity or a negative effective duration gap results when the effective duration of assets is less than the effective duration of liabilities. A positive effective duration of equity or a positive effective duration gap generally indicates that the Bank has some exposure to interest-rate risk in a rising rate environment, and a negative effective duration of equity or a negative effective duration gap generally indicates some exposure to interest-rate risk in a declining interest-rate environment. Higher effective duration numbers, whether positive or negative, indicate greater volatility of market value of equity in response to changing interest rates.
Bank policy requires the Bank to maintain its effective duration of equity within a range of plus five years to minus five years, assuming current interest rates, and within a range of plus seven years to minus seven years, assuming an instantaneous parallel increase or decrease in market interest rates of 200 basis points.
The following table presents the Bank’s effective duration exposure measurements as calculated in accordance with Bank policy (in years).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points |
| Assets | 0.67 | | | 0.52 | | | 0.48 | | | 0.23 | | | 0.21 | | | 0.28 | |
| Liabilities | 0.34 | | | 0.30 | | | 0.27 | | | 0.21 | | | 0.20 | | | 0.18 | |
| Equity | 5.32 | | | 4.10 | | | 3.99 | | | 0.53 | | | 0.37 | | | 2.38 | |
| Effective duration gap | 0.33 | | | 0.22 | | | 0.21 | | | 0.02 | | | 0.01 | | | 0.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points |
| Assets | 0.17 | | | 0.17 | | | 0.19 | | | 0.53 | | | 0.37 | | | 0.39 | |
| Liabilities | 0.17 | | | 0.15 | | | 0.13 | | | 0.28 | | | 0.36 | | | 0.27 | |
| Equity | 0.15 | | | 0.63 | | | 1.42 | | | 4.17 | | | 0.54 | | | 2.38 | |
| Effective duration gap | — | | | 0.02 | | | 0.06 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.01 | | | 0.12 | |
___________
(1)The “down 200 basis points” scenarios shown above are considered to be “constrained shocks,” intended to prevent the possibility of negative interest rates when a designated low rate environment exists. The “constrained shock” scenario may not represent current expectations.
The main factor that impacted the increase in the Bank’s duration of equity during 2020 was the Bank’s MBS portfolio. The Bank’s MBS portfolio is primarily floating rate, but has embedded floors which prevent the coupon payments from going negative in a negative interest rate environment. In a negative rate environment, the embedded floors would cause the variable-rate MBS to function as fixed-rate instruments. As a result, of the embedded floors and the increased possibility of negative market interest rates and the market volatility, the duration of equity increased.
The Bank uses both sophisticated computer models and an experienced professional staff to measure the amount of interest-rate risk in the balance sheet, thus allowing management to monitor the risk against policy and regulatory limits. Management regularly reviews the major assumptions and methodologies used in the Bank’s models and will make adjustments to the Bank’s assumptions and methodologies in response to rapid changes in economic conditions.
The prepayment risk in both advances and investment assets can significantly affect the Bank’s effective duration of equity and effective duration gap. Current regulations require the Bank to mitigate advance prepayment risk by establishing prepayment fees that make the Bank financially indifferent to a borrower’s decision to prepay an advance that carries a rate above current market rates unless the advance contains explicit par value prepayment options. The Bank’sBank policy establishes these prepayment fees for advances
without embedded options are generally based on the present value of the difference between the rate on the prepaid advance and the current rate on an advance with an identical maturity date. Prepayment fees for advances that contain embedded options are generally based on the inverse of the market value of the derivative instrument that the Bank used to hedge the advance.fees.
The prepayment options embedded in mortgage loan and mortgage security assets may shorten or lengthen both the actual and expected cash flows when interest rates change. Current Finance Agency policies limit this source of interest-rate risk by limiting the types of MBS the Bank may own to those with defined estimated average life changes under specific interest-rate shock scenarios. These limits do not apply to mortgage loans purchased from members. The Bank typically hedges mortgage prepayment uncertainty by using callable debt as a funding source and by using interest-rate cap, floor, and swaption transactions. The Bank also uses derivatives to reduce effective duration and option risks for investment securities other than MBS. Effective duration and option risk exposures are measured on a regular basis for all investment assets under alternative rate scenarios.
The Bank also analyzes its interest-rate risk and market exposure by evaluating the theoretical market value of equity. The market value of equity represents the net result of the present value of future cash flows discounted to arrive at the theoretical market value of each balance sheet item. By using the discounted present value of future cash flows, the Bank is able to factor in the various maturities of assets and liabilities, similar to the effective duration analysis discussed above. The Bank determines the theoretical market value of assets and liabilities utilizing a Level 3 pricing approach asthat is more fully described in Note 16—14—Estimated Fair Values to the Bank’s 20202022 audited financial statements. The difference between the market value of total assets and the market value of total liabilities is the market value of equity. A more volatile market value of equity under
different shock scenarios tends to result in a higher effective duration of equity, indicating increased sensitivity to interest rate changes.
The following table presents the Bank’s market value of equity measurements as calculated in accordance with Bank policy (in millions).
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points | | Down 200 Basis
Points (1) | | Base Case | | Up 200 Basis Points |
| Assets | Assets | $ | 91,612 | | | $ | 90,868 | | | $ | 90,046 | | | $ | 149,996 | | | $ | 148,896 | | | $ | 148,146 | | Assets | $ | 151,146 | | | $ | 150,644 | | | $ | 150,096 | | | $ | 78,898 | | | $ | 78,173 | | | $ | 77,600 | |
| Liabilities | Liabilities | 85,617 | | | 85,482 | | | 84,996 | | | 142,301 | | | 141,858 | | | 141,313 | | Liabilities | 143,687 | | | 143,230 | | | 142,837 | | | 73,794 | | | 73,541 | | | 73,097 | |
| Equity | Equity | 5,995 | | | 5,386 | | | 5,050 | | | 7,695 | | | 7,038 | | | 6,833 | | Equity | 7,459 | | | 7,414 | | | 7,259 | | | 5,104 | | | 4,632 | | | 4,503 | |
________________
(1)The “down 200 basis points” scenarios shown above are considered to be “constrained shocks,” intended to prevent the possibility of negative interest rates when a designated low rate environment exists. The “constrained shock” scenario may not represent current expectations.
Under the Bank’s RMP, the Bank’s market value of equity must not decline by more than 15 percent, assuming an immediate, parallel, and sustained interest-rate shock of 200 basis points in either direction.
If effective duration of equity or market value of equity is approaching the boundaries of the Bank’s RMP ranges, management will initiate remedial action or review alternative strategies at the next meeting of the board of directors or appropriate committee thereof.
The scenarios above generally include numerous assumptions, including those related to changes in the balance sheet, interest rates, and prepayment trends. Such assumptions may change through time as a result of a host of factors, including changes in the balance sheet as well as the interest-rate environment. The modeling process is performed in a manner consistent with the Bank’s policies and procedures with results reviewed on an on-going basis by the Bank. While all of the above estimates are reflective of the general interest-rate sensitivity of the Bank, market conditions, the realized growth and remixing of the balance sheet, as well as the broader macroeconomic environment could all have a significant impact on the Bank’s assets, liabilities and equity.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Bank will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or meet the credit needs of its members and borrowers in a timely and cost-efficient manner. The Bank’s objective is to meet operational and member liquidity needs under all reasonable economic and operational situations. The Bank uses liquidity to absorb fluctuations in asset and liability balances and to provide an adequate reservoir of funding to support attractive and stable advance pricing. The Bank meets its liquidity needs from both asset and liability sources.
Credit Risk
The Bank faces credit risk primarily with respect to its advances, investments, derivatives, and mortgage loan assets.
Advances
Secured advances to member financial institutions account for the largest category of Bank assets; thus, advances are a major source of the Bank’s credit risk exposure. The Bank uses a risk-focused approach to credit and collateral underwriting. The Bank attempts to reduce credit risk on advances by monitoring the financial condition of borrowers and the quality and value of the assets that borrowers pledge as eligible collateral.
The Bank determines credit risk rating for its members by evaluating each institution’s overall financial health, taking into account the quality of assets, earnings, and capital position. Prior to September 15, 2020, theThe Bank assignedassigns each borrower that wasis an insured depository institution a credit risk rating from one to 10 according to the relative amount of credit risk that such borrower poses to the Bank (one being the least amount of credit risk and 10 the greatest amount of credit risk). The Bank assigned each borrower that was an insurance company a credit risk rating from 101 to 104 by utilizing an externalinternal model (101 being the least amount of credit risk and 104 the greatest amount of credit risk). The Bank assignedassigns each borrower that wasis an insurance company a credit risk rating from 101
to 104 by utilizing an external model. The Bank assigns each borrower that is not an insured depository institution or an insurance company (including housing associates, community development financial institutions,CDFIs, and corporate credit unions), a credit risk rating from 101 to 104 based on aan internal risk matrix developed for each entity type.
Beginning on September 15, 2020, the Bank no longer assigned each borrower that is an insured depository institution a credit risk rating from one to 10, and began assigning a credit risk rating from 101 to 104. In general, ratings of one through five in the previous rating system equates to a rating of 101 in the new ratings system, ratings of six through eight equates to a rating of 102, a rating of nine equates a rating of 103, and a rating of 10 equates to a rating of 104. The rating process for other borrowers remains unchanged.
In general, borrowers with the greatest amount of credit risk may have more restrictions on the types of collateral they may use to secure advances, may be required to maintain higher collateral maintenance levels and deliver loan collateral, may be restricted from obtaining further advances, and may face more stringent collateral reporting requirements. At times, based upon the Bank’s assessment of a borrower and its collateral, the Bank may place more restrictive requirements on a borrower than those generally applicable to borrowers with the same rating. Management and the board also monitor the Bank’s concentration in secured credit and standby letters of credit exposure to individual borrowers.
The following table presents the number of borrowers and the par value of advances outstanding to borrowers with the specified ratings as of the specified dates (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, 2020 |
| Rating | | | | | | Number of Borrowers | | Par Value of Outstanding Advances |
| 101 | | | | | | 298 | | $ | 37,713 | |
| 102 | | | | | | 32 | | 12,849 | |
| 103 | | | | | | 3 | | 35 | |
| 104 | | | | | | 3 | | 46 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | | | | 336 | | $ | 50,643 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| Rating | | | | | | Number of Borrowers | | Par Value of Outstanding Advances |
| 1 | | | | | | 96 | | $ | 2,387 | |
| 2 | | | | | | 62 | | 14,958 | |
| 3 | | | | | | 48 | | 10,287 | |
| 4 | | | | | | 91 | | 61,269 | |
| 5 | | | | | | 40 | | 4,695 | |
| 6 | | | | | | 7 | | 79 | |
| 7 | | | | | | 4 | | 31 | |
| 8 | | | | | | 1 | | 16 | |
| 9 | | | | | | 2 | | 12 | |
| 10 | | | | | | 3 | | 31 | |
| Subtotal(rating from 1 to 10) | | | | | | 354 | | 93,765 | |
| 101 | | | | | | 11 | | 2,359 | |
| 102 | | | | | | 3 | | 298 | |
| 103 | | | | | | 1 | | 19 | |
| 104 | | | | | | 1 | | 15 | |
| Subtotal(rating from 101 to 104) | | | | | | 16 | | 2,691 | |
| Total | | | | | | 370 | | $ | 96,456 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Rating | | Number of Borrowers | | Par Value of Outstanding Advances | | Number of Borrowers | | Par Value of Outstanding Advances |
| 101 | | 300 | | | $ | 101,663 | | | 243 | | $ | 42,946 | |
| 102 | | 48 | | | 8,370 | | | 20 | | 1,774 | |
| 103 | | 7 | | | 43 | | | 2 | | | 150 | |
| 104 | | 4 | | | 233 | | | 2 | | | 57 | |
| Unrated | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | |
| Total | | 359 | | | $ | 110,309 | | | 268 | | | $ | 44,927 | |
The Bank establishes a credit limit for each borrower. The credit limit is not a committed line of credit, but rather an indication of the borrower’s general borrowing capacity with the Bank. The Bank determines the credit limit in its sole and absolute discretion by evaluating a wide variety of factors that indicate the borrower’s overall creditworthiness. The credit limit is generally expressed as a percentage equal to the ratio of the borrower’s total liabilities to the Bank (including the face amount of outstanding standby letters of credit, the par value of outstanding advances, and the total exposure of the Bank to the borrower under any derivative contract) to the borrower’s total assets. Generally, borrowers are held to a credit limit of no more than 30 percent. However, the Bank’s board of directors, or a relevant committee thereof, may approve a higher limit at its discretion, and such borrowers may be subject to certain additional collateral reporting and maintenance requirements. Five borrowers have been approved for a credit limit higher than 30 percent, however, none of these borrowers exceeded the 30 percent credit limit as of December 31, 2022, and their total outstanding advance and standby letters of credit balance was $18.2$17.9 billion and $238$965 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020.2022.
The Bank obtains collateral on advances to protect against losses, but Finance Agency regulations permit the Bank to accept only certain types of collateral. Each borrower must maintain an amount of qualifying collateral that, when discounted to the lendable collateral value (LCV), is equal to at least 100 percent of the borrower’s outstanding par value of all advances and other liabilities from the Bank. The LCV is the value that the Bank assigns to each type of qualifying collateral for purposes of determining the amount of credit that such qualifying collateral will support. For each type of qualifying collateral, the Bank discounts the market value of the qualifying collateral to calculate the LCV. The Bank regularly reevaluates the appropriate level of discounting. The Bank had rights to collateral on a borrower-by-borrower basis with an estimated value equal to or greater than its outstanding extension of credit as of December 31, 20202022 and December 31, 2019.2021. The following table presents information about the types of collateral held for the Bank’s advances (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Par Value of Outstanding Advances | | LCV of Collateral Pledged by Members | | First Mortgage Collateral (%) | | Securities Collateral (%) | | Other Real Estate Related Collateral (%) |
| As of December 31, 2020 | $ | 50,643 | | | $ | 326,602 | | | 62.96 | | | 11.01 | | | 26.03 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | 96,456 | | | 348,964 | | | 66.00 | | | 8.32 | | | 25.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Par Value of
Outstanding
Advances | | LCV of Collateral Pledged by Members | | First Mortgage Collateral (%) | | Securities Collateral (%) | | Other Real
Estate Related Collateral (%) |
| As of December 31, 2022 | $ | 110,309 | | | $ | 331,253 | | | 63.13 | | | 14.13 | | | 22.74 | |
| As of December 31, 2021 | 44,927 | | | 299,844 | | | 63.09 | | | 12.52 | | | 24.39 | |
For purposes of determining each member’s LCV, the Bank estimates the current market value of all residential first mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, home equity loans, and lines of credit pledged as collateral based on information provided by the member on its loan portfolio or on individual loans through the regular collateral reporting process. The estimated market value is discounted to account for the (1) price volatility of loans, (2) model data uncertainty, and (3) estimated liquidation and servicing costs in the event of the member’s default. Market values, and thus LCVs, change monthly. The use of this market-based valuation methodology allows the Bank to establish its collateral discounts with greater precision and to
provide greater transparency with respect to the valuation of collateral pledged for advances and other credit products offered by the Bank.
The FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the Bank by any member of the Bank, or any affiliate of any such member, priority over the claims and rights of any party (including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar party having
rights of a lien creditor) other than the claims and rights of a party that (1) would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law; and (2) is an actual bona fide purchaser for value or is an actual secured party whose security interest is perfected in accordance with applicable state law.
In its history, the Bank has never experienced a credit loss on an advance. In consideration of this and the Bank’s policies and practices detailed above, the Bank has not established an allowance for credit losses on advances as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Investments
The Bank is subject to credit risk on unsecured investments such asconsisting of investment securities, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold. These investments are generally transacted with government agencies and large financial institutions that are considered to be of investment quality. The Finance Agency defines investment quality as a security with adequate financial backing, so that full and timely payment of principal and interest on such security is expected, and there is minimal risk that the timely payment of principal and interest would not occur because of adverse changes in economic and financial conditions during the projected life of the security.
In addition to Finance Agency regulations, the Bank has established guidelines approved by its board of directors regarding unsecured extensions of credit, with respect to term limits and eligible counterparties.
Finance Agency regulations prohibit the Bank from investing in any of the following securities:
•instruments, such as common stock, that represent an ownership interest in an entity, other than stock in small business investment companies, or certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities;
•instruments issued by non-United Statesnon-U.S. entities, other than those issued by United StatesU.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks;
•debt instruments that are not of investment quality, other than certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities and instruments that the Bank determined became less than investment quality because of developments or events that occurred after purchase by the Bank;
•whole mortgages or other whole loans, other than the following: (1) those acquired under the Bank’s mortgage purchase programs; (2) certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities; (3) certain marketable direct obligations of state, local, or tribal government units or agencies that are of investment quality; (4) MBS or asset-backed securities that are backed by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans; and (5) certain foreign housing loans that are authorized under section 12(b) of the FHLBank Act;
•interest-only or principal-only stripped MBS, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), collateralized debt obligations, and real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs);
•residual-interest or interest-accrual classes of CMOs and REMICs;
•fixed-rate or variable-rate MBS, CMOs, and REMICs that are at rates equal to their contractual cap on the trade date and that have average lives that vary by more than six years under an assumed instantaneous interest-rate change of 300 basis points; and
•non-U.S. dollar denominated securities.
Finance Agency regulations do not permit the Bank to rely exclusively on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) ratings with respect to its investments. The Bank is required to make a determination of whether a security is of investment quality based on its own documented analysis, which includes the NRSRO rating as one of the factors that is assessed to determine investment quality. The Bank monitors the financial condition of investment counterparties to ensure that they are in compliance with the Bank’s RMP and Finance Agency regulations. Unsecured credit exposure to any counterparty is limited by the credit quality and capital of the counterparty and by the capital of the Bank. On a regular basis, management produces financial monitoring reports detailing the financial condition of the Bank’s counterparties. These reports
are reviewed by the Bank’s board of directors. In addition to the Bank’s RMP and regulatory requirements, the Bank may limit or suspend overnight and term trading. Limiting or suspending counterparties limits the pool of available counterparties, shifts the geographical distribution of counterparty exposure, and may reduce the Bank’s overall investment opportunities.
The Bank only enters into investments with U.S. counterparties or U.S. branch offices of foreign banks that have been approved by the Bank through its internal approval process, but the Bank may still have exposure to foreign entities if a counterparty’s parent entity is located in another country. The following tables present the Bank’s gross exposure, by instrument type, according to the location of the parent company of the counterparty (in millions).
| | | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| | | Federal Funds Sold (1) | | Interest-bearing
Deposits (2) | | Net Derivative Exposure | | Total | | Federal Funds Sold | | Interest-bearing
Deposits | | Net Derivative Exposure (1) | | Total |
| Australia | Australia | $ | 970 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 970 | | Australia | $ | 1,295 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,295 | |
| | Canada | Canada | 400 | | | — | | | — | | | 400 | | Canada | 2,405 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,405 | |
| Finland | Finland | 250 | | | — | | | — | | | 250 | | Finland | 796 | | | — | | | — | | | 796 | |
| France | France | 200 | | | — | | | — | | | 200 | | France | 975 | | | — | | | — | | | 975 | |
| Germany | Germany | 970 | | | — | | | — | | | 970 | | Germany | 700 | | | — | | | — | | | 700 | |
| | Netherlands | | Netherlands | 300 | | | — | | | — | | | 300 | |
| | Sweden | 300 | | | — | | | — | | | 300 | | |
| | United States of America | United States of America | 180 | | | 1,644 | | | — | | | 1,824 | | United States of America | 1,565 | | | 1,277 | | | 16 | | | 2,858 | |
| Total | Total | $ | 3,270 | | | $ | 1,644 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,914 | | Total | $ | 8,036 | | | $ | 1,277 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 9,329 | |
(1)Federal funds sold includes $180 million with BankUnited, National Association, one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers as of December 31, 2020.
(2) Interest-bearing deposits include a $431 million business money market account with Truist Bank, one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2019 |
| | Federal Funds Sold (1) | | Interest-bearing Deposits (2) | | Net Derivative Exposure (3) | | Total |
| Australia | $ | 975 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 975 | |
| Austria | 500 | | | — | | | — | | | 500 | |
| Canada | 2,275 | | | — | | | 6 | | | 2,281 | |
| Finland | 1,150 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,150 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Germany | 1,250 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,250 | |
| Japan | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| Netherlands | 450 | | | — | | | — | | | 450 | |
| Norway | 1,495 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,495 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Switzerland | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| United States of America | 1,731 | | | 3,810 | | | 16 | | | 5,557 | |
| Total | $ | 9,826 | | | $ | 3,810 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 13,660 | |
____________
(1)Federal funds sold includes $100 million with BankUnited, National Association, one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers as of December 31, 2019.
(2)Interest-bearing deposits includes a $508 million business money market account with Truist Bank one of the Bank’s 10 largest borrowers, as of December 31, 2019.
(3) Amounts do not reflect collateral; see the table under Risk Management–Credit Risk–Derivatives below for a breakdown of the credit ratings of and the Bank’s credit exposure to derivative counterparties, including net exposure after collateral.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2021 |
| | Federal Funds Sold | | Interest-bearing Deposits | | | | Total |
| Australia | $ | 820 | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 820 | |
| Austria | 55 | | | — | | | | | 55 | |
| Canada | 2,315 | | | — | | | | | 2,315 | |
| Finland | 655 | | | — | | | | | 655 | |
| France | 376 | | | — | | | | | 376 | |
| Germany | 1,010 | | | — | | | | | 1,010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Netherlands | 790 | | | — | | | | | 790 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Sweden | 200 | | | — | | | | | 200 | |
| | | | | | | |
| United States of America | 199 | | | 688 | | | | | 887 | |
| Total | $ | 6,420 | | | $ | 688 | | | | | $ | 7,108 | |
The Bank experienced a decreasean increase in unsecured credit exposure in its investment portfolio related to non-U.S. government and non-U.S. government agency counterparties from $13.6to $9.3 billion as of December 31, 2019 to $4.92022 from $7.1 billion as of December 31, 2020.2021. As of December 31, 2022, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group (Australia), Credit Agricole CIB (France), and Landesbank Baden WuerttembergToronto Dominion Bank (Canada) each represented greater than 10 percent and collectively represented 39.535.1 percent of the total unsecured credit exposure to non-U.S. government or non-U.S. government agenciesagency counterparties.As of December 31, 2020,2022, total unsecured credit portfolio consisted primarily of federal funds sold with overnight maturities.
The Bank’s RMP permits the Bank to invest in U.S. agency (i.e., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae) obligations including the following: (1) CMOs and REMICS that are backed by such securities; and (2) other MBS, CMOs, and REMICS that are of sufficient investment quality, which typically have the highest ratings issued by S&P or Moody’s at the time of purchase. The private-label MBS purchased by the Bank originally attained their triple-A ratings through credit enhancements, which primarily consisted of the subordination of the claims of the other tranches of these securities. In addition to NRSRO ratings, the Bank considers a variety of credit quality factors when analyzing potential investments, such as collateral performance, marketability, asset class considerations, local and regional economic conditions, and the financial health of the underlying issuer.
The following tables presenttable presents information on the credit ratings of the Bank’s investments held as of December 31, 2020 and 20192022 (in millions), based on their credit ratings as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.2022. The credit ratings reflect the lowest long-term credit ratings as reported by an NRSRO.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2020 |
| Carrying Value (1) | | |
| Investment Grade | | | | |
| | AAA | | AA | | A | | BBB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total |
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | $ | — | | | $ | 2,307 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,307 | |
| U.S. Treasury obligations | — | | | 1,500 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,500 | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 295 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 295 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | — | | | 7,283 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,283 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 551 | | | 10,029 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,580 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | 551 | | | 17,607 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,158 | |
| Total investment securities | 551 | | | 21,415 | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 21,966 | |
| Other investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | — | | | 5 | | | 1,591 | | | 48 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,644 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | — | | | 1,000 | | | 4,500 | | | 4,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,500 | |
| Federal funds sold | — | | | 650 | | | 2,440 | | | 180 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,270 | |
| Total other investments | — | | | 1,655 | | | 8,531 | | | 4,228 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14,414 | |
| Total investments | $ | 551 | | | $ | 23,070 | | | $ | 8,531 | | | $ | 4,228 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 36,380 | |
| | | As of December 31, 2019 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| | Carrying Value (1) | | | Carrying Value | |
| | Investment Grade | | Below Investment Grade | | | | Investment Grade | | |
| | | AAA | | AA | | A | | BBB | | BB | | B | | CCC | | CC | | | D | | Unrated | | Total | | AAA | | AA | | A | | BBB | | | Total |
| Investment securities: | Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | $ | — | | | $ | 4,556 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,556 | | Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | $ | — | | | $ | 1,550 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 1,550 | |
| U.S. Treasury obligations | U.S. Treasury obligations | — | | | 1,499 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 1,499 | | U.S. Treasury obligations | — | | | 2,713 | | | — | | | — | | | | 2,713 | |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | State or local housing agency debt obligations | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | Mortgage-backed securities: | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 89 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 89 | | U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | — | | | 257 | | | — | | | — | | | | 257 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | Government-sponsored enterprises residential | — | | | 8,642 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 8,642 | | Government-sponsored enterprises residential | — | | | 5,504 | | | — | | | — | | | | 5,504 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 167 | | | 12,351 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 12,518 | | Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 544 | | | 14,770 | | | — | | | — | | | | 15,314 | |
| Private-label residential | — | | 14 | | 38 | | | 44 | | | 47 | | | 54 | | | 18 | | | 210 | | | 34 | | | | 48 | | | 383 | | | 876 | | |
| | Total mortgage-backed securities | Total mortgage-backed securities | 167 | | | 21,120 | | | 44 | | | 47 | | | 54 | | | 18 | | | 210 | | | 34 | | | | 48 | | | 383 | | | 22,125 | | Total mortgage-backed securities | 544 | | | 20,531 | | | — | | | — | | | | 21,075 | |
| Total investment securities | Total investment securities | 167 | | | 27,176 | | — | | 44 | | — | | 47 | | | 54 | | | 18 | | | 210 | | | 34 | | | | 48 | | | 383 | | | 28,181 | | Total investment securities | 544 | | | 24,795 | | | — | | | — | | | | 25,339 | |
| Other investments: | Other investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other investments: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | — | | | 939 | | | 2,222 | | | 649 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 3,810 | | Interest-bearing deposits | — | | | 3 | | | 1,225 | | | 49 | | | | 1,277 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | — | | | 1,800 | | | 4,250 | | | 2,750 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 8,800 | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | — | | | 6,250 | | | — | | | — | | | | 6,250 | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | — | | | 4,120 | | | 5,176 | | | 530 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 9,826 | | Federal funds sold | — | | | 796 | | | 6,875 | | | 365 | | | | 8,036 | |
| Total other investments | Total other investments | — | | | 6,859 | | | 11,648 | | | 3,929 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | 22,436 | | Total other investments | — | | | 7,049 | | | 8,100 | | | 414 | | | | 15,563 | |
| Total investments | Total investments | $ | 167 | | | $ | 34,035 | | | $ | 11,692 | | | $ | 3,976 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 210 | | | $ | 34 | | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 383 | | | $ | 50,617 | | Total investments | $ | 544 | | | $ | 31,844 | | | $ | 8,100 | | | $ | 414 | | | | $ | 40,902 | |
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered collateralized financing arrangements and effectively represent short-term loans transacted with counterparties that the Bank considers to be of investment quality. The terms of these loans are structured such that if the fair value of the underlying securities decreases below the fair value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is recognized in earnings.
Available-for-sale Securities
Available-for-sale securities are evaluated at the individual security level for impairment on a quarterly basis by comparing the security’s fair value to its amortized cost. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. Impairment exists when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position). In assessing whether a credit loss exists on an impaired security, the Bank considers whether there would be a shortfall in receiving all cash flows contractually due. In the case of U.S. obligations, they carry an explicit U.S. government guarantee and GSE securities are purchased under an assumption that the issuers’ obligation to pay principal and interest on those securities will be honored, taking into account their status as GSEs. Thus, the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero. When a shortfall is considered possible, the Bank compares the present value of cash flows to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows is less than amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the unrealized loss. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. If management intends to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before expected recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is written off and the amortized cost basis is written down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings. If management does not intend to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale and it is not more likely than not that management will be required to sell the debt security, then the credit portion of the difference is recognized as an allowance for credit losses and any remaining difference between the security’s fair value and amortized cost is recorded as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities within other comprehensive income (loss).
Held-to-maturity Securities
Held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense). The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the held-to-maturity security carrying value.
The Bank evaluates its held-to-maturity securities for impairment on a collective, or pooled basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. The Bank has not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 20202022 because the securities: (1) were all highly-rated and/or had short remaining terms to maturity, (2) had not experienced, nor did the Bank expect, any payment
default on the instruments and (3) in the case of U.S., government-sponsored enterprises, or other agency obligations, they carry an implicit or explicit U.S. government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero.zero, and (4) in the case of GSE securities, they are purchased under an assumption that the issuers’ obligation to pay principal and interest on those securities will be honored, taking into account their status as GSEs.
Derivatives
The Bank is subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to its derivative transactions. The amount of credit risk on derivatives depends on the extent to which netting procedures, collateral requirements, and other credit enhancements are used and are effective in mitigating the risk. The Bank manages credit risk through credit analysis, collateral management, and other credit enhancements. The Bank is also required to follow the requirements set forth by applicable regulations.
The Bank’s over-the-counter derivative transactions may either be (1) uncleared derivatives, which are executed bilaterally with a counterparty; or (2) cleared derivatives, which are cleared through a clearing agent with a Clearinghouse. Once a derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing by a Clearinghouse, the derivative transaction is novated, and the executing counterparty is replaced with the Clearinghouse as the counterparty.
For uncleared derivatives, the Bank is subject to nonperformance by counterparties. The Bank generally requires collateral on uncleared derivative transactions. A counterparty must deliver collateral to the Bank if the total market value of the Bank’s exposure to that counterparty rises above a specific trigger point. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, the Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its uncleared derivatives as of December 31, 2020.
Certain of the Bank’s uncleared derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Bank to post additional collateral with its counterparties if there is a deterioration in the Bank’s credit rating. If the Bank’s credit rating had been lowered from its current rating to the next lower rating, the Bank would have been required to deliver $3 million of collateral at fair value to its uncleared derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2020.2022.
If the counterparty has an NRSRO rating, the net exposure after collateral is treated as unsecured credit, consistent with the Bank’s RMP and Finance Agency regulations. If the counterparty does not have an NRSRO rating, the Bank requires collateral for the full amount of the exposure.
For cleared derivatives, the Bank is subject to credit risk due to nonperformance by the Clearinghouse and clearing agent. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, to the Clearinghouse, exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives mitigates credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties, and collateral is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. This does introduce, however, a risk of concentration among the limited number of Clearinghouses and clearing agents. The Bank actively monitors Clearinghouses and clearing agents. An annual review of the Bank’s Clearinghouses is performed, and the Bank also monitors its exposure to Clearinghouses on a monthly basis. The Bank currently utilized two approved Clearinghouses, CME Clearing and LCH Ltd. The Bank also monitors the clearing agents through its unsecured credit system, and the Bank subjects these clearing agents to the same limits as other bilateral derivative counterparties. The parent companies of the clearing agents are monitored through annual reviews, as well as through the Bank’s daily monitoring tools, which include reviewing equity triggers, debt triggers, and credit default swap spread triggers. In addition, exposures to the clearing agents are monitored daily on a swap counterparty report. The Bank currently has the following threetwo approved clearing agents: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,agents, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. The Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its cleared derivatives as of December 31, 2020.2022.
The contractual or notional amount of derivative transactions reflects the involvement of the Bank in the various classes of financial instruments; however, the Bank’s maximum credit risk with respect to derivative transactions, is the estimated cost of replacing the derivative transactions if there is default, less the value of any related collateral, including initial and variation margin. In determining maximum credit risk, the Bank considers accrued interest receivables and payables, as well as the netting requirements to net assets and liabilities.
The following tables present information on the credit ratings of, and the Bank’s credit exposure to, its derivative counterparties (in millions). The credit ratings reflect the lowest long-term credit rating by an NRSRO.
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| | Notional Amount | | Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral | | Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Other Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties | | Notional Amount | | Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral | | Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Other Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties |
| Non-member counterparties: | Non-member counterparties: | | | | | | | | | | | Non-member counterparties: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asset positions with credit exposure: | Asset positions with credit exposure: | | Asset positions with credit exposure: | |
| | Triple-B | | Triple-B | | $ | 10 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | | 393 | | | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | 3 | | Cleared derivatives | | 30,749 | | | 16 | | | 260 | | | — | | | 276 | |
| Liability positions with credit exposure: | Liability positions with credit exposure: | | Liability positions with credit exposure: | |
| Double-A | | 10 | | | (1) | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | |
| | Single-A | Single-A | | 4,061 | | | (67) | | | 70 | | | — | | | 3 | | Single-A | | 9,465 | | | (592) | | | 594 | | | — | | | 2 | |
| Triple-B | | 2,643 | | | (120) | | | 120 | | | — | | | — | | |
| | Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | | 20,429 | | | (11) | | | 395 | | | — | | | 384 | | Cleared derivatives | | 591 | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | | 27,536 | | | (199) | | | 589 | | | — | | | 390 | | Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | | 40,815 | | | (576) | | | 855 | | | — | | | 279 | |
Member institutions (1) | Member institutions (1) | | 12 | | | 1 | | | — | | | (1) | | | — | | Member institutions (1) | | 11 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Total | Total | | $ | 27,548 | | | $ | (198) | | | $ | 589 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 390 | | Total | | $ | 40,826 | | | $ | (576) | | | $ | 855 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 279 | |
____________
(1) Collateral held with respect to derivatives with member institutions when the Bank is acting as an intermediary represents the amount of eligible collateral physically held by or on behalf of the Bank or collateral assigned to the Bank, as evidenced by a written security agreement, and held by the member institution for the benefit of the Bank.
| | | As of December 31, 2019 | | As of December 31, 2021 |
| | Notional Amount | | Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral | | Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Other Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties | | Notional Amount | | Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral | | Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Other Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty | | Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties |
| Non-member counterparties: | Non-member counterparties: | | | | | | | | | Non-member counterparties: | | | | | | | | |
| Asset positions with credit exposure: | | |
| Double-A | | $ | 705 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (6) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | |
| Single-A | | 6,798 | | | 3 | | | (1) | | | — | | | 2 | | |
| | Cleared derivatives | | 23,766 | | | 15 | | | 336 | | | — | | | 351 | | |
| | Liability positions with credit exposure: | Liability positions with credit exposure: | | Liability positions with credit exposure: | |
| | Single-A | Single-A | | 5,189 | | | (165) | | | 169 | | | — | | | 4 | | Single-A | | $ | 10 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Triple-B | | 6,233 | | | (18) | | | 20 | | | — | | | 2 | | |
| | Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | | 31,425 | | | (1) | | | 18 | | | — | | | 17 | | Cleared derivatives | | 15,357 | | | (3) | | | 334 | | | — | | | 331 | |
| Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | | 74,116 | | | (160) | | | 536 | | | — | | | 376 | | Total derivative positions with non-member counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure | | 15,367 | | | (3) | | | 334 | | | — | | | 331 | |
Member institutions (1) | Member institutions (1) | | 141 | | | 4 | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | Member institutions (1) | | 12 | | | 1 | | | — | | | (1) | | | — | |
| Total | Total | | $ | 74,257 | | | $ | (156) | | | $ | 536 | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | 376 | | Total | | $ | 15,379 | | | $ | (2) | | | $ | 334 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 331 | |
____________
(1) Collateral held with respect to derivatives with member institutions when the Bank is acting as an intermediary represents the amount of eligible collateral physically held by or on behalf of the Bank or collateral assigned to the Bank, as evidenced by a written security agreement, and held by the member institution for the benefit of the Bank.
Mortgage Loan Programs
The Bank seeks to manage the credit risk associated with the MPP and the MPF Program by maintaining underwriting and eligibility standards and structuring possible losses into several layers to be shared with the PFIs.
Mortgage loans purchased under the MPP and MPF Program must comply with the underwriting and eligibility standards set forth in applicable MPP guidelines or MPF guidelines. In both MPP and MPF, the Bank and PFIs share the risk of losses on mortgage loans by structuring potential losses on conventional mortgage loans into layers with respect to each master commitment and in compliance with the applicable regulations governing the purchase of mortgage loans by the Bank.
The following table presents the Bank’s credit ratios for mortgage loans held for portfolio, along with each component of the ratio’s calculation (dollars in millions):
The | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Average mortgage loans held for portfolio outstanding during the year (1) | $ | 132 | | | $ | 180 |
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (1) | $ | 120 | | | $ | 150 |
Nonaccrual loans (1) | $ | 4 | | | $ | 6 |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans held for portfolio | $ | — | | | $ | — |
Net charge-offs
| $ | — | | | $ | — |
| | | |
| Ratios (%) | | | |
| Net charge-offs to average mortgage loans held for portfolio outstanding during the year | — | | | 0.05 | |
| Allowance for credit losses to mortgage loans held for portfolio | 0.02 | | | 0.09 | |
| Nonaccrual loans to mortgage loans held for portfolio | 3.66 | | | 4.30 | |
| Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans | 0.45 | | | 2.09 | |
____________
(1) Represents unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans was $219 million and $297 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans was $1 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.balance.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people or systems, or from external events. Operational risk for the Bank also includes reputation and legal risks associated with business practices or market conduct that the Bank may undertake. Operational risk inherently is greatest where transaction processes include numerous processing steps, require greater subjectivity, or are non-routine. The Bank operates in a complex business environment and is subject to numerous regulatory requirements.
The Bank identifies risk through daily operational monitoring, independent reviews, and the strategic planning and risk assessment programs that both consider the operational risk ramifications of the Bank’s business strategies and environment. The Bank has established comprehensive financial and operating policies and procedures to mitigate the likelihood of loss resulting from the identified operational risks. In addition, the Bank’s Operational Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing the Bank’s risk management policies, procedures, strategies, and activities related to operational risks, including overseeing the monitoring process and review of risk assessments. This oversight also includes compliance risk and reputational risk. The Bank effects related changes in processes, information systems, lines of communication, and other internal controls as deemed appropriate in response to identified or anticipated increases in operational risk.
The board of directors has an Enterprise Risk and Operations Committee (EROC) to advise and assist the board with respect to enterprise risk management, operations, information technology, and other related matters. In addition, the Bank’s internal Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) is responsible for the management and oversight of the Bank’s risk management programs and practices. Additionally, the Bank’s Internal Audit department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee of the Bank’s board of directors, regularly tests compliance with the policies and procedures related to managing operational risks.
Cyber-Related Risks. The efficiencies offered by information technology (IT) are necessary components of Bank operations. The IT architecture supports multiple operating systems, database structures, and virtualized servers to support business applications that are a mixture of vendor-licensed and in-house developed. Cyber-attacks are increasing globally across all business sectors and cyber attackers are finding more ways to penetrate organizations’ systems. Cybersecurity threats can result in damage to the Bank’s physical facilities, technology systems, and/or the Bank’s intangible assets. Successful attacks can have a financial, legal, and reputational impact on the Bank as well as disrupt the Bank’s ability to serve its shareholders.
The Bank’s board of directors, through EROC, oversees the major dimensions of the Bank’s information technology program including management of information systems to ensure alignment with the Bank’s strategic plan, risk management activities, and operational performance standards. In that role, EROC oversees the development, implementation and maintenance of the Bank’s information security program including recommending action to the board with respect to the Bank’s information security policy on an annual basis and reviewing reports on the effectiveness of the Bank’s information security program. The Bank’s internal ERC reviews and reports to the board on the risk exposures and risk appetites of the Bank, including those related to information technology. In addition, the Bank’s internal Information Technology Governance Committee oversees IT governance, including: IT risk management and IT operational performance, and the Bank’s internal Security Governance
Committee provides independent and integrated oversight of the information security program. Each of these committees provide information and make recommendations to the board, through the Bank’s executive management committee, regarding their respective oversight authority.
Business Risk
Business risk is the risk of an adverse effect on the Bank’s profitability resulting from external factors that may occur in both the short- and the long-term. Business risk includes political, strategic, reputation, and regulatory events that are beyond the Bank’s control. In particular, during 20202022 and continuing into 2021,2023, the Bank faces business risk, which may include changes in:
•the overall economy;
•the financial services industry or the Bank’s competitive environment; and
•legislation, regulation, or congressional scrutiny affecting the Bank or its members.
Cyclicality and Seasonality
The Bank’s business and the demand for advances from the Bank are generally not subject to the effects of cyclical or seasonal variations, although the Bank’s advance demand may vary based upon fluctuations of its members’ consumer credit liquidity needs.
Effects of Inflation
The majority of the Bank’s assets and liabilities are, and will continue to be, monetary in nature. Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction, or to the same extent, as the prices of goods and services, higher rates of inflation generally result in corresponding increases in interest rates. Inflation, coupled with increasing interest rates, generally has the following effects on the Bank:
•the cost of the Bank’s funds and operating overhead increases;
•the yield on variable-rate assets held by the Bank increases;
•the fair value of fixed-rate investments and mortgage loans held in portfolio decreases; and
•mortgage loan prepayment rates decrease and result in lower levels of mortgage loan refinance activity, which may result in the reduction of Bank advances to members as increased rates tend to slow home sales.
Conversely, lower rates of inflation or deflation have the opposite effects of the above on the Bank and its holdings.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the “FHLBank”) as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, 2021,and the relatedstatements of income, of comprehensive income, of capital, and of cash flowsfor each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2022, including the related notes (collectivelycollectively referred to as the “financial statements”).We also have audited the FHLBank’sFHLBank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the FHLBankas of December 31, 2020 2022and 2019, 2021, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20202022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the FHLBankmaintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The FHLBank’sFHLBank's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the FHLBank’s financial statements and on the FHLBank’sFHLBank's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the FHLBankin accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and, with respect to the financial statements, in accordance with the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A deficiencyin internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting.
We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be a material weakness as defined above.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Interest-Rate Related Derivatives and Hedged Items
As described in Notes 1513 and 1614 to the financial statements, the FHLBank uses derivatives to reduce funding costs and to manage its exposure to interest-rate risks, among other objectives. The total notional amount of derivatives as of December 31, 20202022 was $35$82 billion, of which 80%95% were designated as hedging instruments, and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20202022 was $391$279 million and $11$25 million, respectively. The fair values of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items are calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which utilizes market-observable inputs. The significant assumptions used in the model include discount rates, market indices, and market volatility.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in evaluating the discount rates, market indices, and market volatility assumptions used to fair value these derivatives and hedged items, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items, including controls over the model, data and assumptions. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent range of prices for a sample of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items and comparison of management’s estimate to the independently developed ranges. Developing the independent range of prices involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management and independently developing the discount rates, market indices, and market volatility assumptions.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 4, 2021 on our tests of the entity’scompliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, and other matters for the year ended December 31, 2020. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our compliance testing and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s compliance.
Atlanta, Georgia
March 4, 202110, 2023
We have served as the FHLBank’s auditor since 1990.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(In millions, except par value)
| | | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Assets | Assets | | | | Assets | | | |
| Cash and due from banks | Cash and due from banks | $ | 2,905 | | | $ | 911 | | Cash and due from banks | $ | 141 | | | $ | 879 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits (including deposits with other FHLBanks of $5 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019) | 1,644 | | | 3,810 | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits (including deposits with other FHLBanks of $3 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021) | | Interest-bearing deposits (including deposits with other FHLBanks of $3 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021) | 1,277 | | | 688 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 9,500 | | | 8,800 | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,250 | | | 7,000 | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | 3,270 | | | 9,826 | | Federal funds sold | 8,036 | | | 6,420 | |
| Investment securities: | Investment securities: | | Investment securities: | |
| Trading securities | 1,562 | | | 1,558 | | |
| Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $0 and $643 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) | 0 | | | 684 | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities (fair value of $20,489 and $25,903 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) | 20,404 | | | 25,939 | | |
| | Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $2,747 and $2,648 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively) | | Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $2,747 and $2,648 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively) | 2,713 | | | 2,639 | |
| Held-to-maturity securities (fair value of $22,140 and $15,099 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively) | | Held-to-maturity securities (fair value of $22,140 and $15,099 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively) | 22,626 | | | 15,074 | |
| Total investment securities | Total investment securities | 21,966 | | | 28,181 | | Total investment securities | 25,339 | | | 17,713 | |
| Advances | Advances | 52,168 | | | 97,167 | | Advances | 109,595 | | | 45,415 | |
| | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 218 | | | 296 | | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 120 | | | 149 | |
| | Accrued interest receivable | Accrued interest receivable | 88 | | | 259 | | Accrued interest receivable | 477 | | | 57 | |
| Derivative assets | Derivative assets | 391 | | | 380 | | Derivative assets | 279 | | | 331 | |
| | Other assets, net | Other assets, net | 145 | | | 227 | | Other assets, net | 108 | | | 94 | |
| Total assets | Total assets | $ | 92,295 | | | $ | 149,857 | | Total assets | $ | 151,622 | | | $ | 78,746 | |
| Liabilities | Liabilities | | | | Liabilities | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 1,998 | | | $ | 1,492 | | Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 1,821 | | | $ | 2,054 | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | Consolidated obligations, net: | | Consolidated obligations, net: | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | 25,385 | | | 52,134 | | Discount notes | 39,781 | | | 25,506 | |
| Bonds | Bonds | 59,379 | | | 88,503 | | Bonds | 101,729 | | | 46,186 | |
| Total consolidated obligations, net | Total consolidated obligations, net | 84,764 | | | 140,637 | | Total consolidated obligations, net | 141,510 | | | 71,692 | |
| Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 0 | | | 1 | | Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | — | | | 1 | |
| Accrued interest payable | Accrued interest payable | 45 | | | 212 | | Accrued interest payable | 481 | | | 72 | |
| Affordable Housing Program payable | Affordable Housing Program payable | 82 | | | 89 | | Affordable Housing Program payable | 59 | | | 61 | |
| Derivative liabilities | Derivative liabilities | 11 | | | 7 | | Derivative liabilities | 25 | | | 22 | |
| Other liabilities | Other liabilities | 135 | | | 256 | | Other liabilities | 80 | | | 249 | |
| Total liabilities | Total liabilities | 87,035 | | | 142,694 | | Total liabilities | 143,976 | | | 74,151 | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) | 0 | | 0 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) | | Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) | | | |
| Capital | Capital | | Capital | |
| Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding shares: | Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding shares: | | Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding shares: | |
| Subclass B1 issued and outstanding shares: 10 and 9 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | 943 | | | 899 | | |
| Subclass B2 issued and outstanding shares: 21 and 41 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | 2,135 | | | 4,089 | | |
| Subclass B1 issued and outstanding shares: 7,113,946 and 7,143,718 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | | Subclass B1 issued and outstanding shares: 7,113,946 and 7,143,718 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 711 | | | 715 | |
| Subclass B2 issued and outstanding shares: 46,760,652 and 16,681,827 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | | Subclass B2 issued and outstanding shares: 46,760,652 and 16,681,827 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 4,676 | | | 1,668 | |
| Subclass B3 issued and outstanding shares: 93,107 and 0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | | Subclass B3 issued and outstanding shares: 93,107 and 0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 10 | | | — | |
| Total capital stock Class B putable | Total capital stock Class B putable | 3,078 | | | 4,988 | | Total capital stock Class B putable | 5,397 | | | 2,383 | |
| Retained earnings: | Retained earnings: | | Retained earnings: | | | |
| Restricted | Restricted | 588 | | | 537 | | Restricted | 651 | | | 615 | |
| Unrestricted | Unrestricted | 1,610 | | | 1,616 | | Unrestricted | 1,632 | | | 1,613 | |
| Total retained earnings | Total retained earnings | 2,198 | | | 2,153 | | Total retained earnings | 2,283 | | | 2,228 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (16) | | | 22 | | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (34) | | | (16) | |
| Total capital | Total capital | 5,260 | | | 7,163 | | Total capital | 7,646 | | | 4,595 | |
| Total liabilities and capital | Total liabilities and capital | $ | 92,295 | | | $ | 149,857 | | Total liabilities and capital | $ | 151,622 | | | $ | 78,746 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions)
| | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Interest income | Interest income | | | | | | Interest income | | | | | |
| Advances | Advances | $ | 870 | | | $ | 2,451 | | | $ | 2,227 | | Advances | $ | 1,748 | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 870 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 17 | | | 93 | | | 101 | | Interest-bearing deposits | 62 | | | 2 | | | 17 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 32 | | | 118 | | | 46 | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 143 | | | 2 | | | 32 | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | 48 | | | 279 | | | 223 | | Federal funds sold | 173 | | | 8 | | | 48 | |
| Trading securities | Trading securities | 10 | | | 25 | | | 1 | | Trading securities | — | | | 1 | | | 10 | |
| Available-for-sale securities | Available-for-sale securities | 3 | | | 85 | | | 101 | | Available-for-sale securities | 26 | | | 2 | | | 3 | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | Held-to-maturity securities | 284 | | | 671 | | | 603 | | Held-to-maturity securities | 351 | | | 118 | | | 284 | |
| Mortgage loans | Mortgage loans | 13 | | | 18 | | | 21 | | Mortgage loans | 7 | | | 9 | | | 13 | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | | Loans to other FHLBanks | 1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total interest income | Total interest income | 1,277 | | | 3,740 | | | 3,323 | | Total interest income | 2,511 | | | 448 | | | 1,277 | |
| Interest expense | Interest expense | | | | | | Interest expense | | | | | |
| Consolidated obligations: | Consolidated obligations: | | Consolidated obligations: | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | 357 | | | 1,371 | | | 1,139 | | Discount notes | 805 | | | 12 | | | 357 | |
| Bonds | Bonds | 582 | | | 1,808 | | | 1,604 | | Bonds | 1,345 | | | 155 | | | 582 | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 5 | | | 26 | | | 19 | | Interest-bearing deposits | 34 | | | — | | | 5 | |
| | Total interest expense | Total interest expense | 944 | | | 3,205 | | | 2,762 | | Total interest expense | 2,184 | | | 167 | | | 944 | |
| Net interest income | Net interest income | 333 | | | 535 | | | 561 | | Net interest income | 327 | | | 281 | | | 333 | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | | Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | |
| Net interest income after reversal of provision for credit losses | | Net interest income after reversal of provision for credit losses | 327 | | | 282 | | | 333 | |
| Noninterest income (loss) | | Noninterest income (loss) | | | | | |
| | Noninterest income (loss) | | | | | | |
| Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | 0 | | | (13) | | | (3) | | |
| Net gains (losses) on trading securities | 4 | | | 3 | | | (1) | | |
| Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | 82 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Net realized gains from sale of held-to-maturity securities | 3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities | (6) | | | (4) | | | 29 | | |
| Net (losses) gains on investment securities | | Net (losses) gains on investment securities | — | | | (1) | | | 89 | |
| Net gains (losses) on derivatives | | Net gains (losses) on derivatives | 2 | | | 1 | | | (6) | |
| Standby letters of credit fees | Standby letters of credit fees | 19 | | | 24 | | | 25 | | Standby letters of credit fees | 8 | | | 11 | | | 19 | |
| Gain on litigation settlements, net | | Gain on litigation settlements, net | 4 | | | — | | | — | |
| Other | Other | 11 | | | 9 | | | 1 | | Other | 2 | | | 4 | | | 11 | |
| Total noninterest income | Total noninterest income | 113 | | | 19 | | | 51 | | Total noninterest income | 16 | | | 15 | | | 113 | |
| Noninterest expense | Noninterest expense | | | | | | Noninterest expense | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | Compensation and benefits | 102 | | | 77 | | | 93 | | Compensation and benefits | 65 | | | 80 | | | 102 | |
| Other operating expenses | Other operating expenses | 36 | | | 39 | | | 38 | | Other operating expenses | 47 | | | 38 | | | 36 | |
| Finance Agency | Finance Agency | 10 | | | 10 | | | 8 | | Finance Agency | 10 | | | 10 | | | 10 | |
| Office of Finance | Office of Finance | 7 | | | 8 | | | 7 | | Office of Finance | 8 | | | 7 | | | 7 | |
| Affordable Housing Program non-statutory contribution | | Affordable Housing Program non-statutory contribution | 5 | | | — | | | — | |
| Other | Other | 8 | | | 12 | | | 4 | | Other | 3 | | | 14 | | | 8 | |
| Total noninterest expense | Total noninterest expense | 163 | | | 146 | | | 150 | | Total noninterest expense | 138 | | | 149 | | | 163 | |
| Income before assessment | Income before assessment | 283 | | | 408 | | | 462 | | Income before assessment | 205 | | | 148 | | | 283 | |
| | Affordable Housing Program assessment | Affordable Housing Program assessment | 28 | | | 41 | | | 46 | | Affordable Housing Program assessment | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | |
| | Net income | Net income | $ | 255 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 416 | | Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
| | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net income | Net income | $ | 255 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 416 | | Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | |
| Other comprehensive loss: | Other comprehensive loss: | | Other comprehensive loss: | |
| | Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | | Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | (25) | | | (9) | | | — | |
| Reclassification of unrealized gains related to the sale of available-for-sale securities | Reclassification of unrealized gains related to the sale of available-for-sale securities | (41) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Reclassification of unrealized gains related to the sale of available-for-sale securities | — | | | — | | | (41) | |
| | Net noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for sale securities | 0 | | | (31) | | | (62) | | |
| | Pension and postretirement benefits | Pension and postretirement benefits | 3 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | Pension and postretirement benefits | 7 | | | 9 | | | 3 | |
| Total other comprehensive loss | Total other comprehensive loss | (38) | | | (29) | | | (59) | | Total other comprehensive loss | (18) | | | — | | | (38) | |
| Total comprehensive income | Total comprehensive income | $ | 217 | | | $ | 338 | | | $ | 357 | | Total comprehensive income | $ | 166 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 217 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
(In millions)
| | | | Capital Stock Class B Putable | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income | | Total Capital | | Capital Stock Class B Putable | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Total Capital |
| | | Shares | | Par Value | | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Total | | | Shares | | Par Value | | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Total | |
| Balance, December 31, 2017 | 52 | | | $ | 5,154 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 1,623 | | | $ | 2,003 | | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 7,267 | | |
| Issuance of capital stock | 110 | | | 11,074 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11,074 | | |
| Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (107) | | | (10,705) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (10,705) | | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 0 | | | (37) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (37) | | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | — | | | 83 | | | 333 | | | 416 | | | (59) | | | 357 | | |
| Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | — | | | (309) | | | (309) | | | — | | | (309) | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | 55 | | | 5,486 | | | 463 | | | 1,647 | | | 2,110 | | | 51 | | | 7,647 | | |
| Issuance of capital stock | 91 | | | 9,087 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,087 | | |
| Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (96) | | | (9,564) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9,564) | | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 0 | | | (21) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (21) | | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | — | | | 74 | | | 293 | | | 367 | | | (29) | | | 338 | | |
| Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | 0 | | | (324) | | | (324) | | | — | | | (324) | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | Balance, December 31, 2019 | 50 | | | 4,988 | | | 537 | | | 1,616 | | | 2,153 | | | 22 | | | 7,163 | | Balance, December 31, 2019 | 50 | | | $ | 4,988 | | | $ | 537 | | | $ | 1,616 | | | $ | 2,153 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 7,163 | |
| Issuance of capital stock | Issuance of capital stock | 51 | | | 5,078 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,078 | | Issuance of capital stock | 51 | | | 5,078 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,078 | |
| Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (70) | | | (6,966) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6,966) | | Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (70) | | | (6,966) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6,966) | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 0 | | | (22) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (22) | | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | — | | | (22) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (22) | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | Comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | — | | | 51 | | | 204 | | | 255 | | | (38) | | | 217 | | Comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | — | | | 51 | | | 204 | | | 255 | | | (38) | | | 217 | |
| Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | — | | | — | | | — | | | 29 | | | 29 | | | — | | | 29 | | Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | — | | | — | | | — | | | 29 | | | 29 | | | — | | | 29 | |
| Cash dividends on capital stock | Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | 0 | | | (239) | | | (239) | | | — | | | (239) | | Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | — | | | (239) | | | (239) | | | — | | | (239) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2020 | Balance, December 31, 2020 | 31 | | | $ | 3,078 | | | $ | 588 | | | $ | 1,610 | | | $ | 2,198 | | | $ | (16) | | | $ | 5,260 | | Balance, December 31, 2020 | 31 | | | 3,078 | | | 588 | | | 1,610 | | | 2,198 | | | (16) | | | 5,260 | |
| Issuance of capital stock | | Issuance of capital stock | 13 | | | 1,325 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,325 | |
| Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | | Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (20) | | | (1,993) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,993) | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | — | | | (27) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (27) | |
| Comprehensive income | | Comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | 27 | | | 106 | | | 133 | | | — | | | 133 | |
| Cash dividends on capital stock | | Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | — | | | (103) | | | (103) | | | — | | | (103) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | | Balance, December 31, 2021 | 24 | | | 2,383 | | | 615 | | | 1,613 | | | 2,228 | | | (16) | | | 4,595 | |
| Issuance of capital stock | | Issuance of capital stock | 94 | | | 9,420 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,420 | |
| Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | | Repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (64) | | | (6,367) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6,367) | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | — | | | (39) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (39) | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | | Comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | — | | | 36 | | | 148 | | | 184 | | | (18) | | | 166 | |
| | Cash dividends on capital stock | | Cash dividends on capital stock | — | | | — | | | — | | | (129) | | | (129) | | | — | | | (129) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | | Balance, December 31, 2022 | 54 | | | $ | 5,397 | | | $ | 651 | | | $ | 1,632 | | | $ | 2,283 | | | $ | (34) | | | $ | 7,646 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
| | | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Operating activities | Operating activities | | | | | | Operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | Net income | $ | 255 | | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 416 | | Net income | $ | 184 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 255 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (118) | | | (149) | | | 111 | | |
| | Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |
| Depreciation and amortization (accretion) | | Depreciation and amortization (accretion) | 266 | | | 4 | | | (118) | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | | Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | (1) | | | — | |
| Net change in derivative and hedging activities | Net change in derivative and hedging activities | (482) | | | (456) | | | 66 | | Net change in derivative and hedging activities | 1,066 | | | 673 | | | (482) | |
| Net change in fair value adjustment on trading securities | Net change in fair value adjustment on trading securities | (4) | | | (3) | | | 1 | | Net change in fair value adjustment on trading securities | — | | | 1 | | | (4) | |
| Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | 0 | | | 13 | | | 3 | | |
| | Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | (82) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | — | | | — | | | (82) | |
| Net realized gains from sale of held-to-maturity securities | Net realized gains from sale of held-to-maturity securities | (3) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Net realized gains from sale of held-to-maturity securities | — | | | — | | | (3) | |
| Net change in: | Net change in: | | Net change in: | |
| Accrued interest receivable | Accrued interest receivable | 171 | | | 36 | | | (87) | | Accrued interest receivable | (429) | | | 31 | | | 171 | |
| Other assets | Other assets | 83 | | | (29) | | | 11 | | Other assets | (5) | | | 50 | | | 83 | |
| Affordable Housing Program payable | Affordable Housing Program payable | (8) | | | 3 | | | 7 | | Affordable Housing Program payable | (3) | | | (23) | | | (8) | |
| Accrued interest payable | Accrued interest payable | (166) | | | 8 | | | 62 | | Accrued interest payable | 409 | | | 27 | | | (166) | |
| Other liabilities | Other liabilities | (87) | | | 10 | | | (11) | | Other liabilities | (1) | | | (50) | | | (87) | |
| Total adjustments | Total adjustments | (696) | | | (567) | | | 163 | | Total adjustments | 1,303 | | | 712 | | | (696) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (441) | | | (200) | | | 579 | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 1,487 | | | 845 | | | (441) | |
| Investing activities | Investing activities | | | | | | Investing activities | | | | | |
| Net change in: | Net change in: | | Net change in: | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,831 | | | 2,860 | | | (4,531) | | Interest-bearing deposits | (2,533) | | | 1,074 | | | 1,831 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | (700) | | | (5,050) | | | (1,250) | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 750 | | | 2,500 | | | (700) | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | 6,556 | | | (848) | | | 402 | | Federal funds sold | (1,616) | | | (3,150) | | | 6,556 | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | 0 | | | 500 | | | (300) | | |
| | Trading securities: | Trading securities: | | Trading securities: | |
| Proceeds from sale | | Proceeds from sale | — | | | 61 | | | — | |
| Proceeds from principal collected | | Proceeds from principal collected | — | | | 1,500 | | | — | |
| | Available-for-sale securities: | | Available-for-sale securities: | |
| Proceeds from sale | | Proceeds from sale | — | | | — | | | 726 | |
| | Purchases of long-term | Purchases of long-term | 0 | | | (1,499) | | | 0 | | Purchases of long-term | (98) | | | (2,647) | | | — | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | |
| Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities | 726 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Proceeds from principal collected | 0 | | | 188 | | | 236 | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | Held-to-maturity securities: | | Held-to-maturity securities: | |
| Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities | 195 | | | 0 | | 0 | |
| Proceeds from sale | | Proceeds from sale | — | | | — | | | 195 | |
| | Proceeds from principal collected | Proceeds from principal collected | 11,583 | | | 9,062 | | | 6,760 | | Proceeds from principal collected | 3,431 | | | 6,038 | | | 11,583 | |
| Purchases of long-term | Purchases of long-term | (6,280) | | | (11,087) | | | (5,479) | | Purchases of long-term | (11,150) | | | (556) | | | (6,280) | |
| Advances: | Advances: | | Advances: | |
| Proceeds from principal collected | Proceeds from principal collected | 241,287 | | | 363,655 | | | 415,626 | | Proceeds from principal collected | 315,836 | | | 87,878 | | | 241,287 | |
| Made | (195,421) | | | (351,691) | | | (421,793) | | |
| Originated | | Originated | (381,299) | | | (82,129) | | | (195,421) | |
| Mortgage loans: | Mortgage loans: | | Mortgage loans: | |
| Proceeds from principal collected | Proceeds from principal collected | 78 | | | 63 | | | 73 | | Proceeds from principal collected | 29 | | | 70 | | | 78 | |
| | Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets | Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Purchases of premises, equipment, and software | Purchases of premises, equipment, and software | (7) | | | (4) | | | (5) | | Purchases of premises, equipment, and software | (14) | | | (5) | | | (7) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 59,849 | | | 6,151 | | | (10,258) | | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (76,664) | | | 10,634 | | | 59,849 | |
|
| | | FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
(In millions)
| FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
(In millions)
| FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
(In millions)
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Financing activities | Financing activities | | | | | | Financing activities | | | | | |
| Net change in interest-bearing deposits | Net change in interest-bearing deposits | 480 | | | 332 | | | (26) | | Net change in interest-bearing deposits | (233) | | | 56 | | | 480 | |
| Net payments on derivatives containing a financing element | Net payments on derivatives containing a financing element | (5) | | | (3) | | | (5) | | Net payments on derivatives containing a financing element | (4) | | | (6) | | | (5) | |
| Proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations: | Proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations: | | Proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations: | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | 387,299 | | | 845,332 | | | 1,022,569 | | Discount notes | 785,489 | | | 594,148 | | | 387,299 | |
| Bonds | Bonds | 70,127 | | | 115,627 | | | 68,281 | | Bonds | 90,873 | | | 40,803 | | | 70,127 | |
| Payments for debt issuance costs | Payments for debt issuance costs | (8) | | | (10) | | | (12) | | Payments for debt issuance costs | (6) | | | (2) | | | (8) | |
| Payments for maturing and retiring consolidated obligations: | Payments for maturing and retiring consolidated obligations: | | Payments for maturing and retiring consolidated obligations: | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | (413,915) | | | (859,116) | | | (1,006,848) | | Discount notes | (771,446) | | | (594,018) | | | (413,915) | |
| Bonds | Bonds | (99,271) | | | (106,415) | | | (76,625) | | Bonds | (33,118) | | | (53,689) | | | (99,271) | |
| Proceeds from issuance of capital stock | Proceeds from issuance of capital stock | 5,078 | | | 9,087 | | | 11,074 | | Proceeds from issuance of capital stock | 9,420 | | | 1,325 | | | 5,078 | |
| Payments for repurchase/redemption of capital stock | Payments for repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (6,966) | | | (9,564) | | | (10,705) | | Payments for repurchase/redemption of capital stock | (6,367) | | | (1,993) | | | (6,966) | |
| Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock | Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock | (23) | | | (21) | | | (37) | | Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock | (40) | | | (26) | | | (23) | |
| Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | 29 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation | — | | | — | | | 29 | |
| Cash dividends paid | Cash dividends paid | (239) | | | (324) | | | (309) | | Cash dividends paid | (129) | | | (103) | | | (239) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (57,414) | | | (5,075) | | | 7,357 | | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks | 1,994 | | | 876 | | | (2,322) | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 74,439 | | | (13,505) | | | (57,414) | |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks | | Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks | (738) | | | (2,026) | | | 1,994 | |
| Cash and due from banks at beginning of the year | Cash and due from banks at beginning of the year | 911 | | | 35 | | | 2,357 | | Cash and due from banks at beginning of the year | 879 | | | 2,905 | | | 911 | |
| Cash and due from banks at end of the year | Cash and due from banks at end of the year | $ | 2,905 | | | $ | 911 | | | $ | 35 | | Cash and due from banks at end of the year | $ | 141 | | | $ | 879 | | | $ | 2,905 | |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for: | Cash paid for: | | Cash paid for: | |
| Interest | Interest | $ | 1,233 | | | $ | 3,294 | | | $ | 2,529 | | Interest | $ | 1,516 | | | $ | 146 | | | $ | 1,233 | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessments, net | Affordable Housing Program assessments, net | $ | 35 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 38 | | Affordable Housing Program assessments, net | $ | 28 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 35 | |
| Noncash investing and financing activities: | Noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | Noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | |
| Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | $ | 22 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 37 | | Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock | $ | 39 | | | $ | 27 | | | $ | 22 | |
| Held-to-maturity securities acquired with accrued liabilities | Held-to-maturity securities acquired with accrued liabilities | $ | 0 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 0 | | Held-to-maturity securities acquired with accrued liabilities | $ | — | | | $ | 162 | | | $ | — | |
| | Transfers of mortgage loans to real estate owned | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 2 | | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 1—Nature of Operations
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (Bank) is a federally chartered corporation and is one of 11 district Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). Each FHLBank operates as a separate entity within a defined geographic district and has its own management, employees, and board of directors. The Bank’s defined geographic district includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. The FHLBanks are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that were organized under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), to serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community developments. The primary function of the Bank is to provide readily available, competitively priced funding to its member institutions.
The Bank is a cooperative whose member institutions own substantially all of the capital stock of the Bank. Former members and certain non-members, which own the Bank’s capital stock as a result of a merger or acquisition of a member of the Bank, own the remaining capital stock to support business transactions still carried on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. All holders of the Bank’s capital stock are entitled to receive dividends on their capital stock, to the extent declared by the Bank’s board of directors.
Federally-insured depository institutions, insurance companies, privately-insured state-chartered credit unions, and community development financial institutions that are located in the Bank’s defined geographic district and engaged in residential housing finance are eligible to apply for membership. All members must purchase and hold capital stock of the Bank. A member’s stock requirement is based on the amount of its total assets, as well as the amount of certain of its business activities with the Bank. Housing associates (including state and local housing authorities) that meet certain statutory criteria may also borrow from the Bank. While they are eligible to borrow, housing associates are not members of the Bank and are not allowed to hold capital stock. The Bank does not havesponsor any special purpose entities or any other types of off-balance sheet conduits.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) is, an independent agency in the independent federal regulatorexecutive branch of the U.S. government, supervises and regulates the FHLBanks and is responsible for ensuring that the FHLBanks (1) operate in a safe and sound manner, including that they maintain adequate capital and internal controls; (2) foster liquid, efficient, competitive, and resilient national housing finance markets through their operations and activities; (3) comply with applicable laws and regulations; and (4) carry out their housing finance mission through authorized activities that are consistent with the public interest. The Finance Agency also establishes policies and regulations covering the operations of the FHLBanks.
The Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance (Office of Finance), a joint office of the FHLBanks, facilitates the issuance and servicing of the FHLBanks’ debt instruments, known as consolidated obligations, and prepares the combined quarterly and annual financial reports of the FHLBanks. As provided by the FHLBank Act and applicable regulations, the Bank’s consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. Consolidated obligations are the primary source of funds for the Bank in addition to deposits, other borrowings, and capital stock issued to members. The Bank primarily uses these funds to provide advances to members. The Bank also provides members and non-members with correspondent banking services, such as safekeeping, wire transfer, and cash management services.
Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires the Bank’s management to make subjective assumptions and estimates, which are based upon the information then available to the Bank and are inherently uncertain and subject to change. These assumptions and estimates may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
Estimated Fair Values. The estimated fair value amounts, recorded on the Statements of Condition and in the note disclosures for the periods presented, have been determined by the Bank using available market and other pertinent information and reflect the Bank’s best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any valuation technique. Therefore, these fair values may not be indicative of the amounts that would have been realized in market transactions at the reporting dates.
Financial Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements. The Bank has certain financial instruments, including derivative instruments and securities purchased under agreements to resell, that are subject to offset under master netting agreements or by operation of law. The Bank has elected to offset its derivative asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral received or
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
pledged, when it has the legal right of offset under these master agreements. The Bank does not have any offsetting liabilities related to its securities purchased under agreements to resell for the periods presented.
The net exposure for these financial instruments can change on a daily basis; therefore, there may be a delay between the time this exposure change is identified and additional collateral is requested, and the time when this collateral is received or pledged. There may be a delay for excess collateral to be returned. For derivative instruments, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset based on the terms of the individual master agreement between the Bank and its derivative counterparty. Additional information regarding these agreements is provided in Note 15—13—Derivatives and Hedging Activities.Activities. Based on the fair value of the related securities held as collateral, the securities purchased under agreements to resell were fully collateralized for the periods presented.
Adoption of Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments Accounting Guidance. Beginning on January 1, 2020, the Bank adopted, on a modified retrospective basis, new accounting guidance pertaining to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments that requires a financial asset or group of financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new guidance also requires credit losses relating to these financial instruments, as well as available-for-sale securities, to be recorded through the allowance for credit losses. Key changes as compared to prior accounting guidance are detailed below. Consistent with the modified retrospective method of adoption, the prior period has not been revised to conform to the new basis of accounting. Key changes to the accounting policies are detailed within this note.
Interest-bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold. Interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold provide short-term liquidity and are carried at amortized cost. Interest on interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold is accrued as earned and recorded in interest income on the Statements of Income. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. These investments are generally transacted with counterparties that have received a credit rating of triple-B or greater (investment grade) by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) including the following: Standard and Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), and Fitch Ratings. All of these investments were with counterparties rated investment grade as of December 31, 2020.2022 and 2021. These investments are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense).
The Bank uses the collateral maintenance provision practical expedient to evaluate potential credit losses related to securities purchased under agreements to resell. Consequently, a credit loss would be recognized if there is a collateral shortfall which the Bank does not believe the counterparty will replenish in accordance with its contractual terms. The credit loss would be limited to the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the investment’s amortized cost. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are short-term and are structured such that they are evaluated regularly to determine if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral (i.e., subject to collateral maintenance provisions). If so, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash, generally by the next business day. Based upon the collateral held as security and collateral maintenance provisions with its counterparties, the Bank determined that 0no allowance for credit losses was needed for its securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. The carrying value of securities purchased under agreements excludes accrued interest receivable that was not material as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Federal funds sold are unsecured loans that are generally transacted on an overnight term. All investments in interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold were repaid or expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019. NaN2021. No allowance for credit losses was recorded for these assets as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. The carrying values of interest-bearing deposits excludes accrued interest receivable that was not material as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The carrying values of federal funds sold excludes accrued interest receivable that was not material as of December 31, 20202022 and $10 as of December 31, 2019.2021.
InvestmentInvestments in Debt Securities. InvestmentThe Banks classifies investment securities thatas trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity at the Bank has both the abilitydate of acquisition. Purchases and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost, which is original cost netsales of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are computed using the contractual level-yield method (contractual interest method), adjusted for actual prepayments. The contractual interest method recognizes the income effects of premiums and discounts over the contractual life of the securities based on the actual behavior of the underlying assets, including
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
adjustments for actual prepayment activities, and reflects the contractual terms of the securities without regard to changes in estimated prepayments based on assumptions about future borrower behavior.
Held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit lossesrecorded on a pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense). The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. Prior to January 1, 2020, credit losses were recorded as a direct write-down of the held-to-maturity security carrying value.
The Bank’s held-to-maturity securities consist of U.S. agency obligations, government-sponsored enterprise debt obligations, state or local housing agency debt obligations, and MBS issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) that are backed by single-family or multifamily mortgage loans. The Bank only purchase securities considered investment quality. All of these investments were rated double-A, or above, by a NRSRO as of December 31, 2020, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security.
The Bank has not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2020 because the securities: (1) were all highly-rated and/or had short remaining terms to maturity, (2) had not experienced, nor did the Bank expect, any payment default on the instruments, and (3) in the case of U.S., government-sponsored enterprises, or other agency obligations, carry an implicit or explicit government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero.
The Bank classifies certain investmentinvestments in debt securities acquired for purposes of liquidity and asset-liability management as trading investments and carries these securities at their estimated fair value. The Bank does not participate in speculative trading practices in these investments and generally holds them until maturity, except to the extent management deems necessary to manage the Bank’s liquidity position. The Bank records changes in the fair value of these investments in noninterest income (loss) as “Net (losses) gains (losses) on tradinginvestment securities” on the Statements of Income, along with gains and losses on sales of investment securities using the specific identification method. The Bank does not have any investment securities classified as trading as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
The Bank classifies certain securities that are not held-to-maturity or trading as available-for-sale and carries these securities at their estimated fair value. The Bank records changes in the fair value of these investments in other comprehensive income.income (loss).
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
For available-for-sale securities in hedging relationships that qualify as fair value hedges, the Bank records the portion of the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in interest income on available-for-sale securities together with the related change in fair value of the derivative, and records the remainder of the change in the fair value of the investment in other comprehensive income (loss) as net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities.
For investments in debt securities classified as available-for-sale, the Bank evaluates an individual security for impairment on a quarterly basis by comparing the security’s fair value to its amortized cost. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. Impairment exists when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position). In assessing whether a credit loss exists on an impaired security, the Bank considers whether there would be a shortfall in receiving all cash flows contractually due. When a shortfall is considered possible, the Bank compares the present value of cash flows to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows is less than amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the unrealized loss. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. If management intends to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before expected recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is written off and the amortized cost basis is written down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings. If management does not intend to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale and it is not more likely than not that management will be required to sell the debt security, then the credit portion of the difference is recognized as an allowance for credit losses and any remaining difference between the security’s fair value and amortized cost is recorded as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities within other comprehensive income.income (loss).
For improvements in cash flows of available-for-sale securities, interest income follows the recognition pattern pursuant to the
impairment guidance in effect prior to January 1, 2020 and recoveries of amounts previously written off are recorded when
received. For improvements in impaired available-for-sale securities with an allowance for credit losses, recognized after the adoption of the new guidance, the allowance for credit losses associated with recoveries may be derecognized up to its full amount. Effective January 1, 2020, the net noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairment gains (losses)
The Bank has not established an allowance for credit losses on its available-for-sale securities was reclassifiedas of December 31, 2022 and 2021 because the securities carry an explicit government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero.
Investments in debt securities that the Bank has both the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost, which is original cost net unrealized gains (losses)of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on available-for-salethe Statements of Condition. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are computed using the contractual level-yield method (contractual interest method), adjusted for actual prepayments. The contractual interest method recognizes the income effects of premiums and discounts over the contractual life of the securities within other comprehensive income.based on the actual behavior of the underlying assets, including adjustments for actual prepayment activities, and reflects the contractual terms of the securities without regard to changes in estimated prepayments based on assumptions about future borrower behavior.
Held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense). The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.
The Bank’s held-to-maturity securities consist of GSE debt obligations, state or local housing agency debt obligations, and MBS issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) that are backed by single-family or multifamily mortgage loans. The Bank only purchase securities considered investment quality. All of these investments were rated double-A, or above, by a NRSRO as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security.
The Bank has not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, because the securities: (1) were all highly-rated and/or had short remaining terms to maturity, (2) had not experienced, nor did the Bank expect, any payment default on the instruments, and (3) in the case of U.S. obligations, they carry an explicit U.S. government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero, and (4) in the case of GSE securities, they are purchased under the assumption that the issuers’ obligation to pay principal and interest on those securities will be honored, taking into account their status as GSEs.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Other-than-temporary Impairment of Investment Securities. Beginning January 1, 2020, the Bank adopted new accounting guidance pertaining to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Prior to January 1, 2020, the Bank evaluated its individual available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities in unrealized loss positions for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. A security was considered impaired when its fair value was less than its amortized cost. The Bank considered an other-than-temporary impairment to have occurred under any of the following circumstances:
•the Bank had an intent to sell the impaired debt security;
•if, based on available evidence, the Bank believed it was more likely than not that it would be required to sell the impaired debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis; or
•the Bank did not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired debt security.
If either of the first two conditions above was met, the Bank recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment loss in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value as of the Statements of Condition date.
For securities in an unrealized loss position that meet neither of the first two conditions, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis to determine if it would recover the entire amortized cost basis of each of these securities. The present value of the cash flows expected to be collected was compared to the amortized cost basis of the debt security to determine whether a credit loss exists. If there was a credit loss (the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis of the debt security), the carrying value of the debt security was adjusted to its fair value. However, rather than recognizing the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value in earnings, only the amount of the impairment representing the credit loss (i.e., the credit component) was recognized in earnings, while the amount related to all other factors (i.e., the non-credit component) was recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss on a debt security was limited to the amount of that security’s unrealized losses.
For subsequent accounting of an other-than-temporarily impaired security, the Bank recorded an additional other-than-temporary impairment if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected was less than the amortized cost of the security. The total amount of this additional other-than-temporary impairment (both credit and non-credit component, if any) was determined as the difference between the security’s amortized cost, less the amount of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income prior to the determination of this additional other-than-temporary impairment, and its fair value. Any additional credit loss was limited to that security’s unrealized losses or the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value as of the Statements of Condition date. This additional credit loss, up to the amount in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the security, was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings. Any credit loss in excess of the related other comprehensive income was recorded as additional total other-than-temporary impairment loss and recognized in earnings.
For debt securities classified as available-for-sale, the Bank did not accrete the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income to the carrying value. Rather, subsequent related increases and decreases (if not an other-than-temporary impairment) in the fair value of available-for-sale securities were netted against the non-credit component of other-than-temporary impairment recognized previously in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Upon subsequent evaluation of a debt security where there is no additional other-than-temporary impairment, the Bank adjusted the accretable yield on a prospective basis if there was a significant increase in the security’s expected cash flows. As of the impairment measurement date, a new accretable yield was calculated for the impaired investment security. This adjusted yield was then used to calculate the interest income recognized over the remaining life of the security so as to match the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent significant increases in estimated cash flows change the accretable yield on a prospective basis.
Advances. The Bank reports advances (secured loans to members, former members, or housing associates) at amortized cost. Amortized cost is original cost net of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts (including discounts related to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) and Economic Development and Growth Enhancement Program (EDGE)), net deferred fees or costs, and fair value hedge adjustments. The Bank accretes the discounts on advances and amortizes the recognized unearned commitment fees and hedging adjustments to interest income using the contractual
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
interest method. The Bank records interest on advances to interest income as earned. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition.
In accordance with the new accounting guidance pertaining to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments, advancesAdvances are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense).
The Bank manages its credit exposure to advances through an integrated approach that includes (1) establishing a credit limit for each borrower; (2) an ongoing review of each borrower’s financial condition; and (3) collateral and lending policies to limit risk of loss, while balancing each borrower’s needs for a reliable source of funding. In addition, the Bank lends to financial institutions within its district and housing associates in accordance with federal statutes and Finance Agency regulations. Specifically, the Bank complies with the FHLBank Act, which requires the Bank to obtain sufficient collateral to fully secure advances. The estimated fair value of the collateral required to secure each borrower’s advances is calculated by applying discounts to the fair value or unpaid principal balance of the collateral, as applicable. The Bank accepts certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, deposits, and other real estate related assets as collateral. The Bank’s capital stock owned by its member borrower is also pledged as additional collateral. Collateral arrangements may vary depending upon borrower credit quality, financial condition and performance, borrowing capacity, and the Bank’s overall credit exposure to the borrower. The Bank can call for additional or substitute collateral to protect its security interest. The Bank believes that these policies effectively manage credit risk from advances.
Based upon the financial condition of the borrower, the Bank either allows a borrower to retain physical possession of the collateral pledged to it or requires the borrower to specifically assign the collateral to or place the collateral in physical possession of the Bank or its safekeeping agent. The Bank requires its borrowers to execute an advances and security agreement that establishes the Bank’s security interest in all collateral pledged by the borrower to the Bank. The Bank perfects its security interest in all pledged collateral. The FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the Bank by a borrower priority over the claims or rights of any other party (including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar party having rights of a lien creditor), except for claims or rights of a third party that (1) would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law, and (2) is an actual bona fide purchaser for value or is an actual secured party whose security interest is perfected in accordance with state law.
Using a risk-based approach and taking into consideration each borrower’s financial strength, the Bank considers the types and amounts of pledged collateral to be the primary indicator of credit quality on its advances. The Bank had rights to collateral on a borrower-by-borrower basis with an estimated value equal to or greater than its outstanding extensions of credit as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
The Bank continues to evaluate and make changes to its collateral policies, as necessary, based on current market conditions. No advance was past due, on nonaccrual status, or considered impaired as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. In addition, there were no troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) related to advances as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Based upon the collateral held as security, the Bank’s collateral policies, credit analysis, and the repayment history on advances, the Bank did not anticipateexpect any credit losses on advances as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. Accordingly, the Bank has not recorded any allowance for credit losses on advances as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Prepayment Fees. The Bank charges a borrower a prepayment fee when the borrower prepays certain advances before the original maturity date. The Bank records prepayment fees, net of basis adjustments related to hedging activities included in the carrying value of the advance as part of the advances line item in the interest income section of the Statements of Income. In cases in which there is a prepayment of an existing advance and a contemporaneous funding of a new advance, the Bank evaluates whether the new advance meets the accounting criteria to qualify as a modification of an existing advance or whether it constitutes a new advance. If the new advance qualifies as a modification of the existing advance, the hedging basis adjustments and the net prepayment fee on the prepaid advance are recorded in the carrying value of the modified advance and amortized over the life of the modified advance using the contractual interest method. This amortization is recorded in advance
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
interest income. If the Bank determines that the transaction does not qualify as a modification of an existing advance, it is treated as an advance termination with subsequent funding of a new advance, and the Bank records the net fees as prepayment fees on advances, which is included in the advances line item in the interest income section of the Statements of Income.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. The Bank classifies mortgage loans that it has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoff, as held for portfolio. These mortgage loans are reported at amortized cost, which is original cost, net of periodic principal repayments and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, fair value hedge adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments, and direct write-downs. Accrued interest receivable is recorded separately on the Statements of Condition. The Bank performs at least quarterly an assessment of its mortgage loans held for portfolio to estimate expected credit losses. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense).
The Bank defers and amortizes premiums and accretes discounts (1) paid to and received by the participating financial institutions (PFIs), and (2) mark-to-market basis adjustments on loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments, as interest income using the contractual interest method.
A mortgage loan is considered past due when the principal or interest payment is not received in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The Bank places a conventional mortgage loan on nonaccrual status whenif it is determined that either (1) the collection of the contractualinterest or principal is doubtful or (2) interest from the borroweror principal is past due for 90 days or more, past due.except when the loan is well-secured (e.g. through credit enhancement) and in the process of collection. When a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The Bank records cash payments received on nonaccrual loans as interest income and as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement. A loan on nonaccrual status may be restored to accrual status when the(1) none of its contractual principal and interest are less than 90 days past due.is due and unpaid, and the Bank expects repayment of the remaining contractual interest and principal, or (2) it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection. A government-guaranteed or -insured loan is not placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest is 90 days or more past due because of (1) the U.S. government guarantee or insurance on the loan, and (2) the contractual obligation of the loan servicer to repurchase the loan when certain criteria are met.
A mortgage loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement. Interest income is recognized in the same manner as nonaccrual loans.
Finance Agency regulations require that mortgage loans held in the Bank’s portfolios be credit enhanced. For conventional mortgage loans, PFIs retain a portion of the credit risk on the loans they sell to the Bank by providing credit enhancement either through a direct liability to pay credit losses up to a specified amount or through a contractual obligation to provide supplemental mortgage insurance. PFIs are paid a credit enhancement fee (CE Fee) for assuming credit risk, and in some instances, all or a portion of the CE Fee may be performance based. CE Fees are paid monthly based on the remaining unpaid principal balance of the loans in a master commitment. CE Fees are recorded as an offset to mortgage loan interest income. To the extent that the Bank experiences losses in a master commitment, it may be able to recapture CE Fees paid to the PFI to offset these losses.
At least quarterly, the Bank performs an assessment of its mortgage loans held for portfolio to estimate expected credit losses. The Bank measures expected credit losses on mortgage loans on a collective basis, pooling loans with similar risk characteristics. If a mortgage loan no longer shares risk characteristics with other loans, it is removed from the pool and evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis. When developing the allowance for credit losses, the Bank measures the estimated loss over the remaining life of a mortgage loan, which also considers how the Bank’s credit enhancements mitigate credit losses. If a loan was purchased at a discount, the discount does not offset the allowance for credit losses. The allowance excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, as the Bank writes off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income if a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status.
The Bank invested in government-guaranteed or -insured fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties. Government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans are mortgage loans guaranteed or insured by the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Federal Housing Administration. The servicer provides and maintains insurance or a guarantee from the applicable government agency. The servicer is responsible for compliance with all government agency requirements and for obtaining the benefit of the applicable insurance or guarantee with respect to defaulted government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans. Any losses incurred on these loans that are not recovered from the issuer or the guarantor are absorbed by the servicers. Therefore, the Bank only has credit risk for these loans if the servicer fails to pay for losses not covered by insurance
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
or guarantees.guarantees, but in such instance, the Bank would have recourse against the servicer for such failure. Based on the Bank’s assessment of its servicers and the collateral backing these loans, the Bank did not establish an allowance for credit losses for its government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loan portfolio as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Modified loans that are considered a TDR are evaluated individually for impairment. All other conventional residential mortgage loans are evaluated collectively for impairment. The allowance for conventional residential mortgage loans is
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
determined by an analysis (performed at least quarterly) that includes segregating the portfolio into various aging groups. For loans that are 60 days or less past due, the Bank calculates a loss severity, default rate, and the expected loss based on individual loan characteristics. For loans that are more than 60 days past due, the allowance is determined using an automated valuation model.
Modified loans that are considered a TDR are individually evaluated for impairment when determining the related allowance for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash shortfalls (i.e., loss severity rate) incurred as of the reporting date, as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) providing optional, temporary relief from accounting for certain loan modifications as TDRs was signed into law. Under the CARES Act, TDR relief is available to banks for loan modifications related to the adverse effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (COVID-related modifications) granted to borrowers that are current as of December 31, 2019. TDR relief applies to COVID-related modifications made from March 1, 2020, until the earlier of December 31, 2020, or 60 days following the termination of the national emergency declared by the President of the United States on March 13, 2020. On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, was signed into law, extending the applicable period to the earlier of January 1, 2022, or 60 days following the termination of the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020. The Bank has elected to apply the TDR relief provided by the CARES Act.
As such, all COVID-related modifications meeting the provisions of the CARES Act will be excluded from TDR classification and accounting. COVID-related modifications that do not meet the provisions of the CARES Act will continue to be assessed for TDR classification. Refer to Note 9—Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio for additional information.
A charge-off is recorded if it is estimated that the amortized cost and any applicable accrued interest in the loan will not be recovered. The Bank evaluates whether to record a charge-off on a conventional residential mortgage loan upon the occurrence of a confirming event. Once a loan is 180 days delinquent, the Bank classifies as a loss and charges off the portion of outstanding conventional residential mortgage loan balances in excess of the fair value of the underlying property, less costs to sell and adjusted for any available credit enhancements.
Real estate owned (REO) includes assets that have been received in satisfaction of debt through foreclosures. REO is initially recorded at fair value, less estimated selling costs and is subsequently carried at the lower of that amount or current fair value, less estimated selling costs. The Bank recognizes a charge-off to the allowance for credit losses if the fair value of the REO, less estimated selling costs is less than the recorded investment in the loan at the date of transfer from loans to REO. Any subsequent realized gains, realized or unrealized losses, and carrying costs are included in noninterest income (loss) on the Statements of Income. REO is recorded in “Other assets” on the Statements of Condition and was not material as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities. All derivatives are recognized on the Statements of Condition at their fair values and are reported as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities, net of cash collateral and accrued interest received from or pledged to clearing agents and/or counterparties. The fair values of derivatives are netted by the clearing agent and/or counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset and, if negative, they are classified as a liability. Cash flows associated with a derivative are reflected as cash flows from operating activities on the Statements of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be a financing derivative.
Derivatives not used for intermediary purposes are designated as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of (a) a recognized asset or liability or (b) an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair-value hedge); or (2) a non-qualifying hedge of an asset or liability for asset-liability management purposes. Beginning January 1, 2019, the Bank adopted new hedge accounting guidance, which, among other things, impacts the presentation of gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities for qualifying hedges. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that are effective as, and that are designated and qualify as, a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk (including changes that reflect losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2019, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedged item) was recorded in noninterest income (loss) as “Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities” on the Statements of Income. A non-qualifying hedge is a derivative hedging specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities, or firm commitments that is an acceptable hedging strategy under the Bank’s risk management program and Finance Agency regulatory requirements, but it does not qualify or
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
was not designated for fair value or cash flow hedge accounting. A non-qualifying hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability because only the change in fair value of the derivative is recorded and is not offset by corresponding changes in the fair value of the non-qualifying hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment, unless such asset, liability, or firm commitment is required to be accounted for at fair value through earnings. Both the net interest on the derivative and the fair value adjustments of a non-qualifying hedge are recorded in noninterest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” on the Statements of Income.
The derivatives used in intermediary activities do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are separately marked-to-market through earnings. These amounts are recorded in noninterest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” on the Statements of Income. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not significantly impact the Bank’s results of operations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The net settlement of interest receivables and payables related to derivatives designated as fair-value hedges are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or interest expense of the designated hedged item. The net settlement of interest receivables and payables related to intermediated derivatives for members and other non-qualifying hedges are recognized in noninterest income (loss) as “Net gains (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities”derivatives” on the Statements of Income.
The Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it determines that the derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of a hedged risk, including hedged items such as firm commitments; (2) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (4) the bank determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
When hedge accounting is discontinued due to the Bank’s determination that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge of an existing hedged item, or when the bank decides to cease the specific hedging activity, the Bank will either (1) terminate the derivative, or (2) continue to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, cease to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value, and amortize the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item using the level-yield method. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the Bank will carry the derivative at its fair value on the Statements of Condition, recognizing changes in the fair value of the derivative in current-period earnings.
The Bank may issue debt, make advances, or purchase financial instruments in which a derivative instrument may be “embedded.” Upon execution of these transactions, the Bank assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the advance, debt, or purchased financial instruments (i.e., the host contract) and whether a separate, non-embedded instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that (1) the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and (2) a separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and designated as a stand-alone derivative instrument pursuant to a non-qualifying hedge. However, if the entire contract (the host contract and the embedded derivative) is to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in current-period earnings (e.g., an investment security classified as “trading”), or if the Bank could not identify and measure reliably the embedded derivative for purposes of separating that derivative from its host contract, the entire contract would be carried on the Statements of Condition at fair value, and no portion of the contract could be designated as a hedging instrument.
Premises, Equipment, and Software. Premises, equipment, and the cost of purchased software and certain costs incurred in developing computer software for internal use are recorded in “Other assets” on the Statements of Condition. The Bank records these items at cost, less accumulated depreciation or amortization. The Bank computes depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. The estimated useful lives in years are generally as follows: automobiles and computer hardware—three; capitalized computer software cost—three; office equipment—eight; office furniture and building improvements—10; and building—40. The Bank amortizes leasehold improvements using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease. The Bank capitalizes improvements and expenses ordinary maintenance and repairs when incurred. Premises, equipment, and capital computer software cost and related depreciation and amortization expense were not material to the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations for the reported periods.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following tables present information on premises, equipment, and capitalized computer software cost.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Premises and Equipment | | Computer Software Cost |
| Gross carrying amount | $ | 93 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 64 | |
| Accumulated depreciation or amortization | (78) | | | (76) | | | (57) | | | (55) | |
| Net carrying amount | $ | 15 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Premises and equipment depreciation expense | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 4 | |
| Software amortization expense | | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | |
Deposits. The Bank offers demand and overnight deposits for members and qualifying non-members. A member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds in the Bank that were collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of such funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. The Bank records these items in “Interest-bearing deposits” on the Statements of Condition. The Bank pays interest on demand and overnight deposits based on a daily interest rate.
Consolidated Obligations. The Bank records consolidated obligations at amortized cost. Additionally, the Bank pays concessions to dealers in connection with the issuance of certain consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance prorates the concessions to the Bank based upon the percentage of the debt issued that is assumed by the Bank. The Bank records concessions paid on consolidated obligations as a direct deduction from their carrying amounts, consistent with the presentation of discounts on consolidated obligations. The Bank accretes discounts and amortizes premiums, as well as concessions and hedging basis adjustments on consolidated obligations, to interest expense using the contractual interest method over the contractual term of the corresponding consolidated obligation.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The Bank reclassifies stock that is subject to redemption from capital to a liability after a member submits a written redemption request, gives notice of intent to withdraw from membership, or attains non-member status through a merger or acquisition, charter termination, or involuntary termination from membership since the member’s shares will then meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Member shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and recorded as interest expense on the Statements of Income. The repurchase or redemption of these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments is recorded as cash outflows in the financing activities section of the Statements of Cash Flows.
If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the Bank will reclassify mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock no longer will be classified as interest expense.
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. The Bank evaluates its off-balance sheet credit exposure on a quarterly basis for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for expected credit losses on these off-balance sheet exposures is recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense).
The Bank monitors the creditworthiness of its standby letters of credit based on an evaluation of the member. In addition, standby letters of credit are fully collateralized from the time of issuance. The Bank has established parameters for the measurement, review, classification, and monitoring of credit risk related to these standby letters of credit that result in an internal credit rating, which focuses primarily on an institution’s overall financial health and takes into account the quality of assets, earnings, and capital position. In general, borrowers categorized into the highest risk rating category have more restrictions on the types of collateral that they may use to secure standby letters of credit, may be required to maintain higher collateral maintenance levels and deliver loan collateral, and may face more stringent collateral reporting requirements. Based on the Bank’s credit analyses and collateral requirements, the Bank does not deem it necessary to record any additional liability on the Statements of Condition for these commitments as of December 31, 20202022 or 2019.2021.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Restricted Retained Earnings. The Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended (Capital Agreement), provides that each FHLBank will, on a quarterly basis, allocate 20 percent of its net income to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least one percent of that FHLBank’s average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the calendar quarter. Additionally, the Capital Agreement provides that amounts in restricted retained earnings in excess of 150 percent of the Bank’s restricted retained earnings minimum (i.e., one percent of the Bank’s average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter) may be released from restricted retained earnings. Restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends and are presented separately on the Statement of Condition.
Finance Agency and Office of Finance Expenses. The Finance Agency allocates the FHLBanks’ portion of its expenses and working capital fund among the FHLBanks based on the ratio between each FHLBank’s minimum required regulatory capital and the aggregate minimum required regulatory capital of every FHLBank. Each FHLBank’s proportionate share of the Office of Finance’s operating and capital expenditures is calculated using a formula that is (1) two-thirds based upon each FHLBank’s share of total consolidated obligations outstanding, and (2) one-third based upon an equal pro rata allocation.
Affordable Housing Program. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP that provides subsidies to members to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low and low-to-moderate-income households. The Bank charges the required funding for AHP against earnings and establishes a corresponding liability. The Bank issues AHP advances at interest rates below the customary interest rate for non-subsidized advances. A discount on the AHP advance and charge against the AHP liability is recorded for the present value of the variation in the cash flow caused by the difference in the interest rate between the AHP advance rate and the Bank’s related cost of funds for comparable maturity funding. As an alternative, the Bank has the authority to make the AHP subsidy available to members as a grant. The discount on AHP advances is accreted to interest income on advances using the contractual interest method over the life of the advance.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 3—Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance
The following table provides a summary of accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board which may impactBoard’s recently issued accounting guidance not yet adopted by the Bank’s financial statements.Bank.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounting Standard Update (ASU) | | Description | | Effective Date | | Effect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters |
Disclosure Framework–Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
(ASU 2018-13) | | This guidance amends the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. | | January 1, 2020 | | The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations. |
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(ASU 2016-13) | | This guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects lifetime expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. | | January 1, 2020 | | The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations. |
Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, (ASU 2020-04), as amended by ASU 2021-01(ASU 2020-04) | | This guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. | | March 12, 2020 through December 31, 20222024 | | The Bank expects it may applybegan applying certain of the expedientsamendments related to contract modifications and exceptions providedhedging relationships beginning in the guidance; however, the Bank is still evaluatingthird quarter of 2022. The adoption of this guidance and has yet to apply any of its provisions. Therefore, the fulldid not have a material impact of adopting this guidance on the Bank’s financial condition andor results of operations has not yet been determined. During the fourth quarter of 2020. the Bank elected optional expedients available under ASU 2021-01 specific to discounting transition on a retrospective basis, which did not have a material impact.operations. |
Disclosure Framework–Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans
(ASU 2018-14)Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method (ASU 2022-01) | | This guidance amendsexpands the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.current single-layer hedging method to allow multiple hedged layers of a single closed portfolio. | | December 31, 2020
January 1, 2023 | | The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Bank’sBank's financial condition or results of operations. |
Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures
(ASU 2022-02) | | This guidance eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings by creditors that have adopted the current expected credit loss methodology while enhancing disclosure requirement for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. | | January 1, 2023 | | The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Bank's financial condition or results of operations. |
Note 4—Cash and Due from Banks
The Bank maintains a collected cash balance with a commercial bank, which is a member, in return for certain services, and the average collected cash balance was $11 and $8 for the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 2019, respectively.2021. There are no legal restrictions regarding the withdrawal of these funds.
Note 5—Investments in Debt Securities
Available-for-sale Securities
Major Security Type. The following table presents information on U.S. Treasury obligations that are classified as available-for-sale. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized Cost (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| As of December 31, 2022 | $ | 2,747 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (35) | | | $ | 2,713 | |
| As of December 31, 2021 | $ | 2,648 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | 2,639 | |
____________
(1) Amortized cost includes adjustments made to the cost basis for accretion, amortization, and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments, and excludes accrued interest receivable that was $10 and not material as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 5—Trading SecuritiesThe following table presents U.S. Treasury obligations that are classified as available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses. The unrealized losses are aggregated by the length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or More | | Total |
| | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses |
| As of December 31, 2022 | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,564 | | | $ | (35) | | | $ | 1,564 | | | $ | (35) | |
| As of December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,589 | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,589 | | | $ | (9) | |
Major Security Types.
The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated Fair Value | | Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated Fair Value |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 2,649 | | | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Due after one year through five years | 98 | | | 98 | | | 2,648 | | | 2,639 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 2,747 | | | $ | 2,713 | | | $ | 2,648 | | | $ | 2,639 | |
____________
(1) Amortized cost includes adjustments made to the cost basis for accretion, amortization, and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments, and excludes accrued interest receivable that was $10 and not material as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Interest-rate Payment Terms. The following table presents tradinginterest-rate payment terms for investment securities classified as available-for-sale securities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Fixed-rate | | $ | 1,697 | | | $ | 1,598 | |
| Variable-rate | | 1,050 | | | 1,050 | |
| Total amortized cost | | $ | 2,747 | | | $ | 2,648 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| U.S. Treasury obligations | $ | 1,500 | | | $ | 1,499 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 62 | | | 59 | |
| | | |
| Total | $ | 1,562 | | | $ | 1,558 | |
The following table presents net gains (losses) on trading securities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net gains (losses) on trading securities held at year end | $ | 4 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (1) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Note 6—Available-for-sale Securities Amortized cost includes adjustments made to the cost basis for accretion, amortization, and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments, and excludes accrued interest receivable that was $10 and not material as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
During 2020, the Bank sold all of its available-for-sale private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Proceeds from the sale of the available-for-sale private-label MBS totaled $726 which resulted in a net realized gain of $82 determined by the specific identification method. There were no sales during 20192022 and 2018.2021.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Held-to-maturity Securities
Major Security Type.Types. The following table presents information on private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that are classified as available-for-sale.held-to-maturity securities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized
Cost | | Other-than-temporary Impairment Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| As of December 31, 2020 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | $ | 643 | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Amortized Cost (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Amortized Cost (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 1,550 | | | 2 | | | (34) | | | 1,518 | | | 1,450 | | | 6 | | | (6) | | | 1,450 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | 257 | | | 2 | | | (23) | | | 236 | | | 221 | | | — | | | (3) | | | 218 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 5,504 | | | 1 | | | (166) | | | 5,339 | | | 4,927 | | | 43 | | | (9) | | | 4,961 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 15,314 | | | — | | | (268) | | | 15,046 | | | 8,475 | | | 19 | | | (25) | | | 8,469 | |
| Total | $ | 22,626�� | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (491) | | | $ | 22,140 | | | $ | 15,074 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | (43) | | | $ | 15,099 | |
____________
(1) Amounts represent the non-credit portionExcludes accrued interest receivable of an other-than-temporary impairment during the life$46 and $6 as of the security.December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Redemption Terms.The following table presents private-label residentialthe amortized cost and estimated fair value of held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity. MBS that are classifiednot presented by contractual maturity because their actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 75 | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 435 | | | $ | 435 | |
| Due after one year through five years | 1,416 | | | 1,384 | | | 856 | | | 853 | |
| Due after five years through 10 years | 60 | | | 60 | | | 100 | | | 101 | |
| Due after 10 years | — | | | — | | | 60 | | | 62 | |
| Total non-mortgage-backed securities | 1,551 | | | 1,519 | | | 1,451 | | | 1,451 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 21,075 | | | 20,621 | | | 13,623 | | | 13,648 | |
| Total | $ | 22,626 | | | $ | 22,140 | | | $ | 15,074 | | | $ | 15,099 | |
____________
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable of $46 and $6 as available-for-sale with unrealized losses. The unrealized losses are aggregated by the length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or More | | Total |
| | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized Losses | | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized Losses | | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized Losses |
| As of December 31, 2020 | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | 4 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 0 | | | 2 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (1) | | | 6 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | (1) | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Interest-rate Payment Terms.The following table presents interest-rate payment terms for investment securities classified as available-for-sale.held-to-maturity.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities: | | Non-mortgage-backed securities: | | | | |
| Fixed-rate | | Fixed-rate | | $ | 551 | | | $ | 551 | |
| Variable-rate | Variable-rate | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 617 | | Variable-rate | | 1,000 | | | 900 | |
| Total non-mortgage-backed securities | | Total non-mortgage-backed securities | | 1,551 | | | 1,451 | |
| | Mortgage-backed securities: | | Mortgage-backed securities: | |
| Fixed-rate | Fixed-rate | | 0 | | | 26 | | Fixed-rate | | 1,881 | | | 1,888 | |
| Total amortized cost | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 643 | | |
| Variable-rate | | Variable-rate | | 19,194 | | | 11,735 | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | | Total mortgage-backed securities | | 21,075 | | | 13,623 | |
Total amortized cost (1) | | Total amortized cost (1) | | $ | 22,626 | | | $ | 15,074 | |
The following table presents private-label residential MBS that are classified as available-for-sale and issued by members or affiliates of members, all of which have been issued by Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, NC.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized
Cost | | Other-than-temporary Impairment Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| As of December 31, 2020 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | $ | 456 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 487 | |
____________
(1) Amounts represent the non-credit portionExcludes accrued interest receivable of an other-than-temporary impairment during the life$46 and $6 as of the security.December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Note 7—Held-to-maturity Securities
During 2020, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, the Bank sold all of its held-to-maturity private-label MBS. The amortized cost of the held-to-maturity private-label MBS sold was $192. Proceeds from the sale of the held-to-maturity private-label MBS totaled $195, which resulted in a net realized gain of $3 determined by the specific identification method. For each of the held-to-maturity securities which were sold, the Bank had previously collected at least 85 percent of the principal outstanding at the time of acquisition due to prepayments or scheduled prepayments over the term of the security. As such, the sales were considered maturities for purposes of security classification. There were no sales of held-to-maturity securities during 20192022 and 2018.
Major Security Types. The following table presents held-to-maturity securities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Amortized Cost (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Amortized Cost (1) | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| State or local housing agency debt obligations | $ | 1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 2,245 | | | 6 | | | 0 | | | 2,251 | | | 4,497 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 4,504 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential | 295 | | | 2 | | | 0 | | | 297 | | | 89 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 89 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 7,283 | | | 62 | | | (6) | | | 7,339 | | | 8,642 | | | 20 | | | (29) | | | 8,633 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 10,580 | | | 31 | | | (10) | | | 10,601 | | | 12,518 | | | 0 | | | (34) | | | 12,484 | |
| Private-label residential | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 192 | | | 1 | | | (1) | | | 192 | |
| Total | $ | 20,404 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | (16) | | | $ | 20,489 | | | $ | 25,939 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | (64) | | | $ | 25,903 | |
____________
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable of $9 and $27 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
As required prior to the adoption of new accounting guidance for the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments, the following table presents held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and by the length of time that the individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2019 |
| | Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or More | | Total |
| | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Number of
Positions | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 5 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 0 | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 5 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | 96 | | | 2,504 | | | (4) | | | 54 | | | 2,336 | | | (25) | | | 150 | | | 4,840 | | | (29) | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | 45 | | | 7,993 | | | (13) | | | 50 | | | 3,976 | | | (21) | | | 95 | | | 11,969 | | | (34) | |
| Private-label residential | 15 | | | 62 | | | 0 | | | 19 | | | 65 | | | (1) | | | 34 | | | 127 | | | (1) | |
| Total | 161 | | | $ | 10,939 | | | $ | (17) | | | 123 | | | $ | 6,377 | | | $ | (47) | | | 284 | | | $ | 17,316 | | | $ | (64) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Amortized Cost (1) | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 245 | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 1,202 | | | $ | 1,203 | |
| Due after one year through five years | 1,740 | | | 1,742 | | | 3,035 | | | 3,037 | |
| Due after five years through 10 years | 201 | | | 204 | | | 201 | | | 204 | |
| Due after 10 years | 60 | | | 61 | | | 60 | | | 61 | |
| Total non-mortgage-backed securities | 2,246 | | | 2,252 | | | 4,498 | | | 4,505 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 18,158 | | | 18,237 | | | 21,441 | | | 21,398 | |
| Total | $ | 20,404 | | | $ | 20,489 | | | $ | 25,939 | | | $ | 25,903 | |
Significant Accounting Policies____________.
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable of $9 and $27 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Interest-rate Payment Terms. The following table presents interest-rate payment terms for investment securities classified as held-to-maturity.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Non-mortgage-backed securities: | | | | |
| Fixed-rate | | $ | 1,101 | | | $ | 2,151 | |
| Variable-rate | | 1,145 | | | 2,347 | |
| Total non-mortgage-backed securities | | 2,246 | | | 4,498 | |
| | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | |
| Fixed-rate | | 2,526 | | | 1,177 | |
| Variable-rate | | 15,632 | | | 20,264 | |
| Total mortgage-backed securities | | 18,158 | | | 21,441 | |
Total amortized cost (1) | | $ | 20,404 | | | $ | 25,939 | |
____________
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable of $9 and $27 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The following table presents private-label residential MBS that are classified as held-to-maturity and issued by members or affiliates of members, all of which have been issued by Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, NC.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized
Cost | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| As of December 31, 2020 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | $ | 65 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 65 | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 8—6—Advances
The Bank offeroffers a wide range of fixed- and variable-rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics, and optionality. Fixed-rate advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Variable-rate advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 20 years, where the interest rates reset periodically at a fixed spread to London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR), Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) or other specified indices.
Redemption Terms. The following table presents the Bank’s advances outstanding by redemption terms.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Due in one year or less | Due in one year or less | $ | 23,326 | | | $ | 64,413 | | Due in one year or less | $ | 78,134 | | | $ | 21,819 | |
| Due after one year through two years | Due after one year through two years | 3,803 | | | 7,421 | | Due after one year through two years | 12,981 | | | 3,247 | |
| Due after two years through three years | Due after two years through three years | 3,347 | | | 5,420 | | Due after two years through three years | 7,982 | | | 2,236 | |
| Due after three years through four years | Due after three years through four years | 2,643 | | | 3,382 | | Due after three years through four years | 4,033 | | | 3,145 | |
| Due after four years through five years | Due after four years through five years | 3,657 | | | 4,778 | | Due after four years through five years | 2,427 | | | 3,047 | |
| Due after five years | Due after five years | 13,867 | | | 11,042 | | Due after five years | 4,752 | | | 11,433 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | 50,643 | | | 96,456 | | Total par value | 110,309 | | | 44,927 | |
| Deferred prepayment fees | Deferred prepayment fees | (55) | | | (9) | | Deferred prepayment fees | 3 | | | (70) | |
| Discount on AHP advances | (3) | | | (3) | | |
| Discount on EDGE advances | (1) | | | (2) | | |
| Discounts | | Discounts | (2) | | | (3) | |
| Hedging adjustments | Hedging adjustments | 1,584 | | | 725 | | Hedging adjustments | (715) | | | 561 | |
| Total (1) | Total (1) | $ | 52,168 | | | $ | 97,167 | | Total (1) | $ | 109,595 | | | $ | 45,415 | |
___________
(1) Carrying amounts exclude accrued interest receivable of $77$418 and $214$50 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
The Bank offers callable advances to members that may be prepaid on prescribed dates (call dates) without incurring prepayment or termination fees. The Bank also offers prepayable advances, which are variable-rate advances that may be contractually prepaid by the borrower on specified dates without incurring prepayment or termination fees. Other advances may be prepaid only by paying a fee to the Bank, so the Bank is financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance. The Bank had callable and prepayable advances outstanding of $1,800$14,442 and $4,693$1,755 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
The following table presents advances by year of contractual maturity or next call date for callable advances.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Due or callable in one year or less | Due or callable in one year or less | $ | 25,106 | | | $ | 67,939 | | Due or callable in one year or less | $ | 88,759 | | | $ | 23,564 | |
| Due or callable after one year through two years | Due or callable after one year through two years | 3,768 | | | 6,451 | | Due or callable after one year through two years | 10,521 | | | 2,927 | |
| Due or callable after two years through three years | Due or callable after two years through three years | 3,027 | | | 4,613 | | Due or callable after two years through three years | 2,962 | | | 1,976 | |
| Due or callable after three years through four years | Due or callable after three years through four years | 2,383 | | | 3,067 | | Due or callable after three years through four years | 1,163 | | | 3,125 | |
| Due or callable after four years through five years | Due or callable after four years through five years | 3,637 | | | 4,517 | | Due or callable after four years through five years | 2,277 | | | 2,177 | |
| Due or callable after five years | Due or callable after five years | 12,722 | | | 9,869 | | Due or callable after five years | 4,627 | | | 11,158 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 50,643 | | | $ | 96,456 | | Total par value | $ | 110,309 | | | $ | 44,927 | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Convertible advances offered by the Bank allow the Bank to convert the fixed-rate advance to a variable-rate advance at the current market rate on certain specified dates. The Bank had convertible advances outstanding of $5,316$1,266 and $4,261$5,307 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. The following table presents advances by year of contractual maturity or, for convertible advances, next conversion date.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Due or convertible in one year or less | Due or convertible in one year or less | $ | 28,258 | | | $ | 68,520 | | Due or convertible in one year or less | $ | 79,317 | | | $ | 27,082 | |
| Due or convertible after one year through two years | Due or convertible after one year through two years | 4,142 | | | 7,437 | | Due or convertible after one year through two years | 12,994 | | | 3,271 | |
| Due or convertible after two years through three years | Due or convertible after two years through three years | 3,321 | | | 5,319 | | Due or convertible after two years through three years | 8,033 | | | 2,215 | |
| Due or convertible after three years through four years | Due or convertible after three years through four years | 2,612 | | | 3,342 | | Due or convertible after three years through four years | 4,012 | | | 3,137 | |
| Due or convertible after four years through five years | Due or convertible after four years through five years | 3,620 | | | 4,529 | | Due or convertible after four years through five years | 2,110 | | | 2,976 | |
| Due or convertible after five years | Due or convertible after five years | 8,690 | | | 7,309 | | Due or convertible after five years | 3,843 | | | 6,246 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 50,643 | | | $ | 96,456 | | Total par value | $ | 110,309 | | | $ | 44,927 | |
Interest-rate Payment Terms. The following table presents interest-rate payment terms for advances.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Fixed-rate: | Fixed-rate: | | | | Fixed-rate: | | | |
| Due in one year or less | Due in one year or less | $ | 15,304 | | | $ | 36,366 | | Due in one year or less | $ | 36,379 | | | $ | 14,715 | |
| Due after one year | Due after one year | 24,620 | | | 25,985 | | Due after one year | 13,786 | | | 20,391 | |
| Total fixed-rate | Total fixed-rate | 39,924 | | | 62,351 | | Total fixed-rate | 50,165 | | | 35,106 | |
| Variable-rate: | Variable-rate: | | | | Variable-rate: | | | |
| Due in one year or less | Due in one year or less | 8,022 | | | 28,047 | | Due in one year or less | 41,755 | | | 7,104 | |
| Due after one year | Due after one year | 2,697 | | | 6,058 | | Due after one year | 18,389 | | | 2,717 | |
| Total variable-rate | Total variable-rate | 10,719 | | | 34,105 | | Total variable-rate | 60,144 | | | 9,821 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 50,643 | | | $ | 96,456 | | Total par value | $ | 110,309 | | | $ | 44,927 | |
Advance Concentrations. The Bank’s advances are concentrated in commercial banks, credit unions, savings institutions, and credit unionsinsurance companies, and further is concentrated in certain larger borrowing relationships. The concentration of the Bank’s advances to its 10 largest borrowers was $36,259$75,475, or 68.4 percent of total advances, and $71,769$32,076, or 71.4 percent of total advances, as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, respectively. This concentration represented 71.6 percent and 74.4 percent of the total par value of advances outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019,2021, respectively.
For information related to the Bank’s credit risk on advances and allowance for credit losses, see Note 2—2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.Policies.
Note 9—7—Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
The Bank purchased fixed-rate residential mortgage loans directly from PFIs, who service and credit enhance the residential mortgage loans that they sold to the Bank. The Bank ceased purchasing these loans directly from PFIs in 2008. The Bank may also acquire fixed-rate residential mortgage loans through participation in eligible mortgage loans purchased from other FHLBanks.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information on mortgage loans held for portfolio by contractual maturity at the time of purchase.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Medium-term (15 years or less) | Medium-term (15 years or less) | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 5 | | Medium-term (15 years or less) | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 2 | |
| Long-term (greater than 15 years) | Long-term (greater than 15 years) | | 216 | | | 292 | | Long-term (greater than 15 years) | | 119 | | | 148 | |
| | Total unpaid principal balance | Total unpaid principal balance | | 219 | | | 297 | | Total unpaid principal balance | | 120 | | | 150 | |
| Premiums | | 1 | | | 1 | | |
| | Discounts | Discounts | | (1) | | | (1) | | Discounts | | — | | | (1) | |
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio (1) | Total mortgage loans held for portfolio (1) | | 219 | | | 297 | | Total mortgage loans held for portfolio (1) | | 120 | | | 149 | |
| Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | | (1) | | | (1) | | Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans | | — | | | — | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | | $ | 218 | | | $ | 296 | | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | | $ | 120 | | | $ | 149 | |
____________
(1) ExcludeExcludes accrued interest receivable of $1 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
The following table presents the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans held for portfolio by collateral or guarantee type.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Conventional mortgage loans | Conventional mortgage loans | | $ | 203 | | | $ | 278 | | Conventional mortgage loans | | $ | 109 | | | $ | 137 | |
| Government-guaranteed or insured mortgage loans | Government-guaranteed or insured mortgage loans | | 16 | | | 19 | | Government-guaranteed or insured mortgage loans | | 11 | | | 13 | |
| Total unpaid principal balance | Total unpaid principal balance | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 297 | | Total unpaid principal balance | | $ | 120 | | | $ | 150 | |
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses related to conventional residential mortgage loans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Provision for credit losses | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
As required by prior accounting guidance for determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, the following table presents the recorded investment in conventional residential mortgage loans by impairment methodology as of December 31, 2019. The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, hedging adjustments, and direct write-downs. The recorded investmentwhich is not net of any valuation allowance.material for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | As of December 31, 2019 |
Allowance for credit losses: | | | | |
| | | | |
Collectively evaluated for impairment | | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | |
Recorded investment: | | | | |
Individually evaluated for impairment | | | | $ | 8 | |
Collectively evaluated for impairment | | | | 271 | |
Total recorded investment | | | | $ | 279 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | | — | | | (1) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Balance, end of year | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Payment status is a key credit quality indicator for conventional mortgage loans and allows the Bank to monitor the migration of past due loans.borrower performance. Other delinquency statistics include, non-accrualnonaccrual loans and loans in process of foreclosure. The following tables present the payment status for conventional mortgage loans. Loans are grouped by loans originated in the most recent five years and those loans originated prior to the most recent five-year period.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | |
| | | Origination Year | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2016 | | Prior to 2016 | | Total | | | As of December 31, 2022(2) | | As of December 31,2021(3) |
Payment status, at amortized cost:(1)
| Payment status, at amortized cost:(1)
| | | | | | | Payment status, at amortized cost:(1)
| | |
| Past due 30-59 days | Past due 30-59 days | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 6 | | Past due 30-59 days | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
| Past due 60-89 days | Past due 60-89 days | | 0 | | | 2 | | | 2 | | Past due 60-89 days | | 1 | | | 1 |
| Past due 90 days or more | Past due 90 days or more | | 1 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | Past due 90 days or more | | 4 | | | 7 |
| Total past due mortgage loans | Total past due mortgage loans | | 1 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | Total past due mortgage loans | | 7 | | | 10 | |
| Current mortgage loans | Current mortgage loans | | 42 | | | 141 | | | 183 | | Current mortgage loans | | 102 | | | 126 |
| Total conventional mortgage loans | Total conventional mortgage loans | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 160 | | | $ | 203 | | Total conventional mortgage loans | | $ | 109 | | | $ | 136 | |
____________
(1) Amortized cost excludes accrued interest receivable of $1 as of December 31, 2020.2022 and 2021.
| | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2019 |
Payment status, at recorded investment:(1)
| |
Past due 30-59 days | $ | 8 | |
Past due 60-89 days | 2 | |
Past due 90 days or more | 6 | |
Total past due mortgage loans | 16 | |
Current mortgage loans | 263 | |
Total conventional mortgage loans | $ | 279 | |
____________
(1)(3) Recorded investment includes accrued interest receivable of $1 as of December 31, 2019.Represents conventional mortgage loans originated prior to 2017.
The following tables present the other delinquency statistics for all mortgage loans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2022 |
| Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans | | Government-guaranteed or Insured Residential Mortgage Loans | | Total |
| Other delinquency statistics, at amortized cost: | | | | | |
In process of foreclosure (1) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Seriously delinquent rate (2) | 4.01 | % | | 6.84 | % | | 4.26 | % |
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (3) | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status (4) | $ | 4 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2020 |
| Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans | | Government-guaranteed or Insured Residential Mortgage Loans | | Total |
| Other delinquency statistics, at amortized cost: | | | | | |
In process of foreclosure (1) | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Seriously delinquent rate (2) | 6.03 | % | | 8.10 | % | | 6.18 | % |
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (3) | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status (4) | $ | 12 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 12 | |
____________
(1) Includes mortgage loans where the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative, such as a pursuit of deed-in-lieu, has been reported.
(2) Mortgage loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure expressed as a percentage of the total mortgage loan portfolio segment.
(3) Mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(4) Represents mortgage loans with contractual principal or interest payments 90 days or more past due and not accruing interest. As of December 31, 2020, NaN of these conventional mortgage loans on non-accrual status had an associated allowance for credit losses.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | As of December 31, 2019 | | As of December 31, 2021 |
| | Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans | | Government-guaranteed or Insured Residential Mortgage Loans | | Total | | Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans | | Government-guaranteed or Insured Residential Mortgage Loans | | Total |
| Other delinquency statistics, at recorded investment: | Other delinquency statistics, at recorded investment: | | | | | | Other delinquency statistics, at recorded investment: | | | | | |
In process of foreclosure (1) | In process of foreclosure (1) | $ | 1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | In process of foreclosure (1) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Seriously delinquent rate (2) | Seriously delinquent rate (2) | 1.96 | % | | 0.39 | % | | 1.86 | % | Seriously delinquent rate (2) | 4.70 | % | | 6.26 | % | | 4.83 | % |
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (3) | Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (3) | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (3) | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status (4) | Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status (4) | $ | 5 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 5 | | Mortgage loans on nonaccrual status (4) | $ | 6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6 | |
____________
(1) Includes mortgage loans where the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative, such as a pursuit of deed-in-lieu, has been reported.
(2) Mortgage loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure expressed as a percentage of the total mortgage loan portfolio segment.
(3) Mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(4) Represents mortgage loans with contractual principal or interest payments 90 days or more past due and not accruing interest.
The Bank’s servicers may grant a forbearance period to borrowers who have requested forbearance based on COVID-19 related difficulties regardless of the status of the loan at the time of the request. The Bank continues to apply its accounting policy for past due loans and charge-offs to loans during the forbearance period unless there is a legal modification made to update the terms of the mortgage loan contract. The accrual status for loans under forbearance will be driven by the past due status of the loan.
As of December 31, 2020, there were $17 in unpaid principal balance2022 and 2021, none of conventional residential mortgage loans in a forbearance plan as a result of COVID-19, representing 7.60 percenton nonaccrual status had an associated allowance for credit losses because either these loans were previously charged off to the expected recoverable value or the fair value of the Bank’s mortgage loans held for portfolio. Ofunderlying collateral, including any credit enhancements, was greater than the conventional residential mortgage loans in a forbearance plan, $6 in unpaid principal balanceamortized cost of these conventional loans had a current payment status, $1 were 30 to 59 days past due, $1 were 60 to 89 days past due, and $9 were 90 days or more past due and in nonaccrual payment status.the loans.
A troubled debt restructuringTDR is considered to have occurred when a concession that would not have been considered otherwise is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties. The Bank has granted a concession when it does not expect to collect all amounts due under the original contract as a result of the restructuring. In the event the Bank grants a concession, the borrower’s monthly payment is restructured for a period of up to 36 months to try to achieve a target housing expense ratio of not more than 31.0 percent of their qualifying income. To restructure the loan, the outstanding principal balance is first re-amortized to reflect a principal and interest payment for a term not to exceed 40 years. This results in a balloon payment at the original maturity date of the loan as the maturity date and number of remaining monthly payments are not adjusted. If the 31.0 percent housing expense ratio is not achieved through re-amortization, the interest rate is reduced below the original note rate in 0.125 percent increments to a floor rate of 3.00 percent until the target 31.0 percent housing expense ratio is met. These reductions in principal and interest payments are for the temporary payment modification period of up to 36 months. Additionally, aA conventional residential mortgage loan in which the borrower filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and the bankruptcy court discharged the borrower’s obligation to the Bank is also considered a troubled debt restructuring. Troubled debt restructurings are evaluated individually for impairment.
Section 4013TDR. The amount of the CARES Act provides temporary relief from the accounting and reporting requirements for TDRs for certain loan modifications related to COVID-19. Specifically, the CARES Act provides that a qualifying financial institution may elect to suspend (1) the requirements under U.S. GAAP for certain loan modifications that would otherwise be categorized as a TDR, and (2) any determination that such loan modifications would be considered a TDR, including the related impairment for accounting purposes. Section 4013 of the CARES Act applies to any modification related to an economic hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, including an interest rate modification, a repayment plan, or any similar arrangement that defers or delays payment of principal or interest, that occurs during the period beginning on March 1, 2020 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2020 or the date that is 60 days after the declaration of the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic ends for a loan that was not more than 30 days past duematerial as of December 31, 2019. On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, was signed into law, extending the applicable period to the earlier of January 1, 2022 or 60 days following the termination of the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020. The Bank has elected to suspend TDR accounting for eligible modifications under Section 4013 of the CARES Act. The Bank had none of these modificationsand 2021.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
outstanding as of December 31, 2020. The recorded investment in mortgage loans classified as TDRs was $0 and $8 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Note 10—8—Consolidated Obligations
Consolidated obligations, consisting of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, are the joint and several obligations of the FHLBanks and are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks.
The Bank is primarily liable for its portion of consolidated obligations (i.e., those issued on its behalf) and also is jointly and severally liable with the other 10 FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all consolidated obligations of each of the FHLBanks. The Finance Agency, at its discretion, may require any FHLBank to make principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation, whether or not the consolidated obligation represents a primary liability of such FHLBank. Although it has never occurred, to the extent that an FHLBank makes any payment on a consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank that is primarily liable for such consolidated obligation, Finance Agency regulations provide that the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement from the noncomplying FHLBank for any payments made on its behalf and any other associated costs (including interest to be determined by the Finance Agency). However, if the Finance Agency determines that the noncomplying FHLBank is unable to satisfy its repayment obligations, the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liabilities of the noncomplying FHLBank among the remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank’s participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding. The Finance Agency reserves the right to allocate the outstanding liabilities for the consolidated obligations among the FHLBanks in any other manner it may determine to ensure that the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner. The par value of the FHLBanks’ outstanding consolidated obligations, including consolidated obligations issued by the Bank, was $746,772$1,181,743 and $1,025,895$652,862 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
Regulations require each FHLBank to maintain, in the aggregate, unpledged qualifying assets equal to that FHLBank’s consolidated obligations outstanding. Qualifying assets are defined as cash; secured advances; obligations of or fully guaranteed by the United States; mortgages guaranteed or insured by the United StatesU.S. or its agencies; participations, mortgages, or other securities of or issued by certain government-sponsored enterprises; and such securities as fiduciary and trust funds may invest in under the laws of the state in which the FHLBank is located. The Bank held unpledged qualifying assets of $91,760$151,236 and $149,251$78,321 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, compared to a book value of $84,764$141,510 and $140,637$71,692 in consolidated obligations as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
General Terms. Consolidated obligations are issued with either fixed- or variable-rate coupon payment terms and may use a variety of indices for interest-rate resets including the LIBOR, SOFR and others. To meet the expected specific needs of certain investors in consolidated obligations, both fixed- and variable-rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain certain features, which may result in complex coupon payment terms and call options. When such consolidated obligations are issued, the Bank generally enters into derivatives containing offsetting features that, in effect, convert the terms of the consolidated obligation bond to those of a simple variable-rate consolidated obligation bond.
These consolidated obligations, beyond having fixed-rate or simple variable-rate coupon payment terms, may also have the following broad term regarding either principal repayment or coupon payment terms:
Optional Principal Redemption Consolidated Obligation Bonds (callable bonds) that the Bank may redeem in whole or in part at its discretion on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the consolidated obligation bond offerings.
With respect to interest payments, consolidated obligation bonds may have the following term in addition to fixed-rate and simple variable-rate payment terms:
Step-up/down Consolidated Obligation Bonds have coupons at fixed rates for specified intervals over the lives of the consolidated obligation bonds. At the end of each specified interval, the coupon rate increases (or decreases) or steps up (or steps down). These consolidated obligation bond issues generally contain call provisions enabling the bonds to be called at the Bank’s discretion.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Interest-rate Payment Terms. The following table presents the Bank’s consolidated obligation bonds by interest-rate payment type.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Simple variable-rate | Simple variable-rate | $ | 52,935 | | | $ | 56,938 | | Simple variable-rate | $ | 51,525 | | | $ | 16,400 | |
| Fixed-rate | Fixed-rate | 6,322 | | | 30,810 | | Fixed-rate | 46,561 | | | 27,751 | |
| Step up/down | Step up/down | 75 | | | 735 | | Step up/down | 6,115 | | | 2,295 | |
| | Total par value | Total par value | $ | 59,332 | | | $ | 88,483 | | Total par value | $ | 104,201 | | | $ | 46,446 | |
Redemption Terms. The following table presents the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding by year of contractual maturity.
| | | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | Amount | | Weighted-
average
Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-
average
Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-
average
Interest Rate (%) | | Amount | | Weighted-
average
Interest Rate (%) |
| Due in one year or less | Due in one year or less | $ | 43,788 | | | 0.24 | | | $ | 79,699 | | | 1.75 | | Due in one year or less | $ | 62,408 | | | 4.13 | | | $ | 16,640 | | | 0.16 | |
| Due after one year through two years | Due after one year through two years | 11,205 | | | 0.25 | | | 4,426 | | | 1.90 | | Due after one year through two years | 14,210 | | | 1.43 | | | 2,110 | | | 0.55 | |
| Due after two years through three years | Due after two years through three years | 340 | | | 2.05 | | | 817 | | | 2.32 | | Due after two years through three years | 9,986 | | | 1.96 | | | 10,700 | | | 0.81 | |
| Due after three years through four years | Due after three years through four years | 1,719 | | | 2.33 | | | 546 | | | 2.84 | | Due after three years through four years | 8,701 | | | 1.20 | | | 4,720 | | | 0.67 | |
| Due after four years through five years | Due after four years through five years | 1,090 | | | 0.50 | | | 1,635 | | | 2.47 | | Due after four years through five years | 6,135 | | | 2.61 | | | 7,829 | | | 0.94 | |
| Due after five years | Due after five years | 1,190 | | | 3.76 | | | 1,360 | | | 3.54 | | Due after five years | 2,761 | | | 2.37 | | | 4,447 | | | 1.76 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | 59,332 | | | 0.40 | | | 88,483 | | | 1.82 | | Total par value | 104,201 | | | 3.17 | | | 46,446 | | | 0.67 | |
| Premiums | Premiums | 11 | | | 4 | | | Premiums | 8 | | | 10 | | |
| Discounts | Discounts | (20) | | | (20) | | | Discounts | (13) | | | (17) | | |
| Hedging adjustments | Hedging adjustments | 56 | | | 36 | | | Hedging adjustments | (2,467) | | | (253) | | |
| Total | Total | $ | 59,379 | | | $ | 88,503 | | | Total | $ | 101,729 | | | $ | 46,186 | | |
The following table presents the Bank’s consolidated obligation bonds outstanding by call feature.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Noncallable | Noncallable | $ | 59,247 | | | $ | 76,243 | | Noncallable | $ | 62,050 | | | $ | 22,053 | |
| Callable | Callable | 85 | | | 12,240 | | Callable | 42,151 | | | 24,393 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 59,332 | | | $ | 88,483 | | Total par value | $ | 104,201 | | | $ | 46,446 | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the Bank’s consolidated obligation bonds outstanding, by year of contractual maturity, or for callable consolidated obligation bonds, by next call date.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Due or callable in one year or less | Due or callable in one year or less | $ | 43,873 | | | $ | 81,624 | | Due or callable in one year or less | $ | 98,320 | | | $ | 40,712 | |
| Due or callable after one year through two years | Due or callable after one year through two years | 11,205 | | | 3,746 | | Due or callable after one year through two years | 2,610 | | | 1,778 | |
| Due or callable after two years through three years | Due or callable after two years through three years | 315 | | | 432 | | Due or callable after two years through three years | 1,330 | | | 1,674 | |
| Due or callable after three years through four years | Due or callable after three years through four years | 1,659 | | | 171 | | Due or callable after three years through four years | 587 | | | 1,090 | |
| Due or callable after four years through five years | Due or callable after four years through five years | 1,090 | | | 1,320 | | Due or callable after four years through five years | 133 | | | 3 | |
| Due or callable after five years | Due or callable after five years | 1,190 | | | 1,190 | | Due or callable after five years | 1,221 | | | 1,189 | |
| Total par value | Total par value | $ | 59,332 | | | $ | 88,483 | | Total par value | $ | 104,201 | | | $ | 46,446 | |
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes. Consolidated obligation discount notes are issued to raise short-term funds and have original contractual maturities of up to one year. These consolidated obligation discount notes are issued at less than their face amounts and redeemed at par value when they mature.
The following table presents the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation discount notes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Book Value | | Par Value | | Weighted-average
Interest Rate (%) |
| As of December 31, 2020 | $ | 25,385 | | | $ | 25,389 | | | 0.11 | |
| As of December 31, 2019 | $ | 52,134 | | | $ | 52,298 | | | 1.64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Book Value | | Par Value | | Weighted-average
Interest Rate (%) |
| As of December 31, 2022 | $ | 39,781 | | | $ | 40,005 | | | 4.00 | |
| As of December 31, 2021 | $ | 25,506 | | | $ | 25,507 | | | 0.04 | |
Note 11—9—Affordable Housing Program
Affordable Housing Program. Annually, each FHLBank must set aside 10 percent of its income subject to assessment for the AHP, or such additional prorated sums as may be required so that the aggregate annual contribution of the FHLBanks is not less than $100. For purposes of the AHP calculation, each FHLBank’s income subject to assessment is defined as the individual FHLBank’s net income before assessments, plus interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The Bank accrues this expense monthly based on its income subject to assessment. The Bank reduces the AHP liability as members use subsidies.
If the Bank experienced a net loss during a quarter but had income subject to assessment in subsequent quarters, it would be required to contribute additional amounts to meet its calculated annual obligation based on the Bank’s year-to-date income subject to assessment. If the Bank experienced a net loss for a full year, the Bank would have no obligation to the AHP for the year since each FHLBank’s required annual AHP contribution is limited to its annual income subject to assessment. If the aggregate of 10 percent of income subject to assessment for all FHLBanks was less than $100, each FHLBank would be required to contribute additional amounts so that the aggregate contribution of the FHLBanks equals the required $100. Each FHLBanks’ prorated contribution would be determined based on its income in relation to the income of all FHLBanks for the previous year. There was no shortfall in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, or 2018.2020. If an FHLBank finds that its required contributions are contributing to the financial instability of that FHLBank, it may apply to the Finance Agency for a temporary suspension of its contributions. No FHLBank made such an application in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, or 2018.2020. The Bank had outstanding principal in AHP-related advances of $16$10 and $19$12 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents a rollforward of the Bank’s AHP liability.
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Balance, beginning of year | Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 77 | | Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 89 | |
| AHP assessment | AHP assessment | | 28 | | | 41 | | | 46 | | AHP assessment | | 21 | | | 15 | | | 28 | |
| AHP non-statutory contribution | | AHP non-statutory contribution | | 5 | | | — | | | — | |
| Subsidy usage, net | Subsidy usage, net | | (35) | | | (37) | | | (38) | | Subsidy usage, net | | (28) | | | (36) | | | (35) | |
| Balance, end of year | Balance, end of year | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 85 | | Balance, end of year | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 82 | |
In 2022, the Bank made a $5 voluntary non-statutory contribution to its AHP.
Note 12—10—Capital
Capital. The Bank is subject to the following three regulatory capital requirements under its capital plan, the FHLBank Act, and Finance Agency regulations.
Risk-Based Capital. The Bank must maintain, at all times, permanent capital in an amount at least equal to the sum of its credit risk capital requirement, its market risk capital requirement, and its operational risk capital requirement, calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency. Permanent capital is defined by the FHLBank Act and regulations as the sum of retained earnings and the amounts paid-in for Class B stock.Only permanent capital satisfies the risk-based capital requirement.The Finance Agency may require the Bank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined.
Total Regulatory Capital. The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to maintain total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least four percent of total assets at all times. Total regulatory capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, the amounts paid-in for Class A stock (if any), the amount of the Bank’s general allowance for losses (if any), and the amount of any other instruments identified in the capital plan and approved by the Finance Agency. The Bank has not issued any Class A stock, has no general allowance for losses, and has no other instruments identified in the capital plan and approved by the Finance Agency; therefore, the Bank’s total regulatory capital is equal to its permanent capital as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. Total regulatory capital does not include accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
Leverage Capital. The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to maintain leverage capital in an amount equal to at least five percent of total assets at all times. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and all other components of total capital. Although mandatorily redeemable capital stock is not included in capital for financial reporting purposes, such outstanding stock is considered capital for determining compliance with these regulatory capital requirements.
The following table presents the Bank’s compliance with the Finance Agency’s regulatory capital rules and requirements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Required | | Actual | | Required | | Actual |
| Risk-based capital | $ | 801 | | | $ | 7,680 | | | $ | 814 | | | $ | 4,612 | |
| Total regulatory capital ratio | 4.00 | % | | 5.07 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 5.86 | % |
| Total regulatory capital | $ | 6,065 | | | $ | 7,680 | | | $ | 3,150 | | | $ | 4,612 | |
| Leverage capital ratio | 5.00 | % | | 7.60 | % | | 5.00 | % | | 8.79 | % |
| Leverage capital | $ | 7,581 | | | $ | 11,520 | | | $ | 3,937 | | | $ | 6,918 | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Bank’s Capital Plan provides for three subclasses of Class B stock, as follows:
•shares of subclass B1 capital stock are issued to meet the membership stock requirement under the capital plan;
•shares of subclass B2 capital stock are issued to meet the advances activity-based stock requirement under the capital plan; and
•shares of subclass B3 capital stock are issued to meet the standby letters of credit activity-based stock requirement under the capital plan.
Each subclass of Class B stock is issued, redeemed, and Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stockrepurchased at a par value of $100 per share. Member shares cannot be purchased or sold except between the Bank and its members at $100 per share par value. The minimum stock requirement for each member is the sum of the membership stock requirement and the activity-based stock requirements. The capital plan permits the Bank’s board of directors to set the membership and activity-based stock requirements within a range as set forth in the capital plan. Activity-based stock held by a member is that amount of subclass B2 or B3 capital stock that the member is required to own for as long as certain transactions between the Bank and the member remain outstanding. The manner in which the activity-based stock requirement is determined under the capital plan is set forth below.
Subclass B1 capital stock.As of December 31, 2022, the membership stock requirement was an amount of subclass B1 capital stock equal to 0.05 percent (five basis points) of the member’s total assets as of December 31, 2021, subject to a cap of $15. The membership stock requirement is recalculated using the member’s total assets as of the preceding calendar year-end at least annually by March 31.
Subclass B2 capital stock. The Bank’s board of directors approved an adjustment to the activity-based stock requirement from 3.75 percent to 4.25 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances. This change became effective as of December 5, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the advances activity-based stock requirement was an amount of subclass B2 capital stock equal to the sum of the following:
•4.25 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances; and
•8.00 percent of any outstanding targeted debt or equity investments (such as multifamily residential mortgage loan assets) sold by the member to the Bank on or after December 17, 2004, although none of these investments were outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
The advances activity-based stock requirement also may include a percentage of any outstanding balance of acquired member assets (such as residential mortgage loan assets) although this percentage was set at zero as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Subclass B3 capital stock. As of December 31, 2022, the standby letters of credit activity-based requirement was an amount equal to 0.10 percent (10 basis points) of members’ outstanding standby letters of credit. As of December 31, 2021, the standby letters of credit activity-based stock requirement was not yet in effect.
The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations require that the minimum stock requirement for members must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet its minimum regulatory capital requirement. Therefore, from time to time, the Bank’s board of directors may adjust the membership stock requirement and the activity-based stock requirement within specified ranges set forth in the capital plan. Any adjustment outside the ranges would require an amendment to the capital plan and Finance Agency approval. Each member is required to comply promptly with any adjustment to the minimum stock requirement. The FHLBank Act provides that the Bank may repurchase, at its sole discretion, any member’s capital stock investment that exceeds the required minimum amount (excess capital stock). Under certain circumstances, Finance Agency regulations limit the ability of the Bank to create member excess stock. The Bank may not pay dividends in the form of capital stock or issue excess capital stock to any member if the Bank’s excess capital stock exceeds one percent of its total assets or if the issuance of excess capital stock would cause the Bank’s excess capital stock to exceed one percent of its total assets. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Bank’s excess capital stock did not exceed one percent of its total assets.
A member may redeem its excess Class B capital stock at par value payable in cash five years after providing written notice to the Bank. The Bank, at its option, may repurchase a member’s excess capital stock before expiration of the five-year notice period. The Bank’s authority to redeem or repurchase capital stock is subject to a number of limitations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Under Finance Agency regulations, the Bank’s board of directors may, but is not required to, declare and pay non-cumulative dividends in cash or capital stock from unrestricted retained earnings and current earnings. All shares of capital stock share in any dividend without preference. Dividends are computed on the average daily balance of capital stock outstanding during the relevant time period. The Bank may not pay a dividend if the Bank is not in compliance with any of its regulatory capital requirements or if a payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its regulatory capital requirements.
The Bank declares and pays any dividends only after net income is calculated for the preceding quarter. The following table presents the Bank’s declared and paid quarterly cash dividends in 2022, 2021, and 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) | | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) | | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) |
| First quarter | | $ | 22 | | | 3.70 | | | $ | 30 | | | 3.72 | | | $ | 76 | | | 5.93 | |
| Second quarter | | 23 | | | 3.74 | | | 27 | | | 3.69 | | | 70 | | | 5.53 | |
| Third quarter | | 33 | | | 4.11 | | | 23 | | | 3.67 | | | 58 | | | 4.35 | |
| Fourth quarter | | 51 | | | 5.30 | | | 23 | | | 3.70 | | | 35 | | | 4.00 | |
| Total | | $ | 129 | | | 4.34 | | | $ | 103 | | | 3.70 | | | $ | 239 | | | 5.03 | |
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation. The Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 was enacted in August 1987, which, among other things, provided for the recapitalization of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation through a newly-chartered entity, the Financing Corporation (FICO). The capitalization of FICO was provided by capital distributions from the FHLBanks to FICO in exchange for FICO nonvoting capital stock. Capital distributions were made by the FHLBanks in 1987, 1988, and 1989 that aggregated to $680. Upon passage of Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, the FHLBanks’ previous investment in capital stock of FICO was determined to be non-redeemable and the FHLBanks charged-off their prior capital distributions to FICO directly against retained earnings.
Upon the dissolution of FICO which ultimately concluded in July 2020, FICO determined that excess funds aggregating to $200 were available for distribution to its stockholders, the FHLBanks. Specifically, the Bank’s partial recovery of prior capital distribution was $29 which was determined based on its share of the $680 originally contributed. This distribution of funds was received by the Bank in June 2020. The FHLBanks treated the receipt of these funds as a return of the FHLBanks’ investment in FICO capital stock, and therefore as a partial recovery of the prior capital distributions made by the FHLBanks to FICO in 1987, 1988, and 1989. These funds have been credited to unrestricted retained earnings.
Capital. The Bank is subject to the following 3 regulatory capital requirements under its capital plan, the FHLBank Act, and Finance Agency regulations.
Risk-Based Capital. The Bank must maintain, at all times, permanent capital in an amount at least equal to the sum of its credit risk capital requirement, its market risk capital requirement, and its operations risk capital requirement, calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency. Permanent capital is defined by the FHLBank Act and regulations as the sum of retained earnings and the amounts paid-in for Class B stock.Only permanent capital satisfies the risk-based capital requirement.The Finance Agency may require the Bank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined.
Total Regulatory Capital. The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to maintain total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least 4 percent of total assets at all times. Total regulatory capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, the amount paid-in for Class A stock (if any), the amount of the Bank’s general allowance for losses (if any), and the amount of any other instruments identified in the capital plan and approved by the Finance Agency. The Bank has not issued any Class A stock, has no general allowance for losses, and has no other instruments identified in the capital plan and approved by the Finance Agency; therefore, the Bank’s total regulatory capital is equal to its permanent capital as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. Total regulatory capital does not include accumulated other comprehensive income but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
Leverage Capital. The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to maintain leverage capital in an amount equal to at least 5 percent of total assets at all times. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and all other capital weighted 1.0 times. Although mandatorily redeemable capital stock is not included in capital for financial reporting purposes, such outstanding stock is considered capital for determining compliance with these regulatory capital requirements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the Bank’s compliance with the Finance Agency’s regulatory capital rules and requirements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Required | | Actual | | Required | | Actual |
| Risk-based capital | $ | 1,496 | | | $ | 5,276 | | | $ | 1,423 | | | $ | 7,142 | |
| Total regulatory capital ratio | 4.00 | % | | 5.72 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 4.77 | % |
| Total regulatory capital | $ | 3,692 | | | $ | 5,276 | | | $ | 5,994 | | | $ | 7,142 | |
| Leverage capital ratio | 5.00 | % | | 8.58 | % | | 5.00 | % | | 7.15 | % |
| Leverage capital | $ | 4,615 | | | $ | 7,914 | | | $ | 7,493 | | | $ | 10,713 | |
The Bank offers 2 subclasses of Class B stock, each of which is issued, redeemed, and repurchased at a par value of $100 per share. Member shares cannot be purchased or sold except between the Bank and its members at $100 per share par value. Shares of subclass B1 capital stock are issued to meet the membership stock requirement under the capital plan and shares of subclass B2 capital stock are issued to meet the activity-based stock requirement under the capital plan. Activity-based stock held by a member is that amount of subclass B2 capital stock that the member is required to own for as long as certain transactions between the Bank and the member remain outstanding. The manner in which the activity-based stock requirement is determined under the capital plan is set forth below.
The minimum stock requirement for each member is the sum of the membership stock requirement and the activity-based stock requirement. The capital plan permits the Bank’s board of directors to set the membership and activity-based stock requirements within a range as set forth in the capital plan. As of December 31, 2020, the membership stock requirement was an amount of subclass B1 capital stock equal to 0.09 percent (nine basis points) of the member’s total assets as of December 31, 2019, subject to a cap of $15. The membership stock requirement is recalculated using the member’s total assets as of the preceding calendar year-end at least annually by March 31. As of December 31, 2020, the activity-based stock requirement was an amount of subclass B2 capital stock equal to the sum of the following:
•4.25 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances; and
•8.00 percent of any outstanding targeted debt or equity investments (such as multifamily residential mortgage loan assets) sold by the member to the Bank on or after December 17, 2004.
The activity-based stock requirement also may include a percentage of any outstanding balance of acquired member assets (such as residential mortgage loan assets) although this percentage was set at 0 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations require that the minimum stock requirement for members must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet its minimum regulatory capital requirement. Therefore, from time to time, the Bank’s board of directors may adjust the membership stock requirement and the activity-based stock requirement within specified ranges set forth in the capital plan. Any adjustment outside the ranges would require an amendment to the capital plan and Finance Agency approval. Each member is required to comply promptly with any adjustment to the minimum stock requirement. The FHLBank Act provides that the Bank may repurchase, at its sole discretion, any member’s capital stock investment that exceeds the required minimum amount (excess capital stock). Under certain circumstances, Finance Agency regulations limit the ability of the Bank to create member excess stock. The Bank may not pay dividends in the form of capital stock or issue excess capital stock to any member if the Bank’s excess capital stock exceeds one percent of its total assets or if the issuance of excess capital stock would cause the Bank’s excess capital stock to exceed one percent of its total assets. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Bank’s excess capital stock did not exceed one percent of its total assets.
A member may redeem its excess Class B capital stock at par value payable in cash five years after providing written notice to the Bank. The Bank, at its option, may repurchase a member’s excess capital stock before expiration of the five-year notice period. The Bank’s authority to redeem or repurchase capital stock is subject to a number of limitations.
Under Finance Agency regulations, the Bank’s board of directors may, but is not required to, declare and pay non-cumulative dividends in cash or capital stock from unrestricted retained earnings and current earnings. All shares of capital stock share in any dividend without preference. Dividends are computed on the average daily balance of capital stock outstanding during the
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
relevant time period. The Bank may not pay a dividend if the Bank is not in compliance with any of its regulatory capital requirements or if a payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its regulatory capital requirements.
The Bank declares and pays any dividends only after net income is calculated for the preceding quarter. The following table presents the Bank’s declared and paid quarterly cash dividends in 2020, 2019, and 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) | | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) | | Amount | | Annualized Rate (%) |
| First quarter | | $ | 76 | | | 5.93 | | | $ | 85 | | | 6.47 | | | $ | 65 | | | 5.16 | |
| Second quarter | | 70 | | | 5.53 | | | 81 | | | 6.54 | | | 80 | | | 5.78 | |
| Third quarter | | 58 | | | 4.35 | | | 82 | | | 6.36 | | | 82 | | | 6.19 | |
| Fourth quarter | | 35 | | | 4.00 | | | 76 | | | 6.05 | | | 82 | | | 6.19 | |
| Total | | $ | 239 | | | 5.03 | | | $ | 324 | | | 6.36 | | | $ | 309 | | | 5.77 | |
The concentration of the Bank’s regulatory capital stock to its 10 largest shareholders was $1,683, or 54.7 percent, and $3,200, or 64.1 percent, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The following table presents the activity in mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Net reclassification from capital during the year | 22 | | | 21 | | | 37 | |
| Repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock | (23) | | | (21) | | | (37) | |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
As of December 31, 2020, the Bank’s outstanding mandatorily redeemable capital stock consisted of B1 membership stock and B2 activity-based stock. The Bank is not required to redeem activity-based stock until the later of the expiration of the redemption period, which is five years after notification is received, or until the activity no longer remains outstanding.
The following table presents the amount of mandatorily redeemable capital stock by year of redemption. The year of redemption in the table is the end of the five-year redemption period, or with respect to activity-based stock, the later of the expiration of the five-year redemption period or the activity’s maturity date.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Due after three years through four years | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
A member may cancel or revoke its written notice of redemption or its notice of withdrawal from membership at any time prior to the end of the five-year redemption period, subject to payment of a cancellation fee as set forth in the capital plan. If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the Bank will reclassify mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 13—11—Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeLoss
The following table presents the components comprising accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.loss.
| | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-sale Securities | | Noncredit Portion
of Other-than-
temporary
Impairment Losses on Available-for-
sale Securities | | Pension and
Postretirement
Benefits | | Total Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive (Loss) Income | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-sale Securities | | Noncredit Portion
of Other-than-
temporary
Impairment Losses on Available-for-
sale Securities | | Pension and
Postretirement
Benefits | | Total Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss |
| Balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | (24) | | | $ | 110 | | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | | |
| | Net change in fair value | 0 | | | (65) | | | 0 | | | (65) | | |
| Actuarial gain | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3 | | | 3 | | |
| | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income: | | |
| Noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses | 0 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 3 | | |
| | Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | 0 | | | (62) | | | 3 | | | $ | (59) | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | 0 | | | 72 | | | (21) | | | 51 | | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | | |
| | Net change in fair value | 0 | | | (44) | | | 0 | | | (44) | | |
| Actuarial loss | 0 | | | 0 | | | (4) | | | (4) | | |
| | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income: | | |
| Noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses | 0 | | | 13 | | | 0 | | | 13 | | |
Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | 0 | | 0 | | | 6 | | | 6 | | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | 0 | | | (31) | | | 2 | | | (29) | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | Balance, December 31, 2019 | 0 | | | 41 | | | (19) | | | 22 | | Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | ��� | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | (19) | | | $ | 22 | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | |
| Adoption of ASU 2016-13 as amended | Adoption of ASU 2016-13 as amended | 41 | | | (41) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Adoption of ASU 2016-13 as amended | 41 | | | (41) | | | — | | | — | |
| Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | 41 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 41 | | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | 41 | | | — | | | — | | | 41 | |
| Actuarial loss | Actuarial loss | 0 | | | 0 | | | (2) | | | (2) | | Actuarial loss | — | | | — | | | (2) | | | (2) | |
| | | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income: | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income: | | — | | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income: | |
| Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | (82) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (82) | | |
| Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | (82) | | | — | | | — | | | (82) | |
Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 5 | | Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | — | | | — | | | 5 | | | 5 | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | 0 | | | (41) | | | 3 | | | (38) | | Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | — | | | (41) | | | 3 | | | (38) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2020 | Balance, December 31, 2020 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (16) | | | $ | (16) | | Balance, December 31, 2020 | — | | | — | | | (16) | | | (16) | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | |
| | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | (9) | | | — | | | — | | | (9) | |
| | Actuarial loss | | Actuarial loss | — | | | — | | | (3) | | | (3) | |
| | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income: | | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income: | |
| Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | | Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | 12 | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | | Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (9) | | | — | | | 9 | | | — | |
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | | Balance, December 31, 2021 | (9) | | | — | | | (7) | | | (16) | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications: | |
| | Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | | Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | (25) | | | — | | | — | | | (25) | |
| Actuarial gain | | Actuarial gain | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | 6 | |
| | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income: | | Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income: | |
| Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | | Amortization of pension and postretirement (1) | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | | Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (25) | | | — | | | 7 | | | (18) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | | Balance, December 31, 2022 | $ | (34) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (34) | |
____________
(1) Included in Noninterest expense - Other on the Statements of Income.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 14—12—Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Bank participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (Pentegra Plan), a tax-qualified defined-benefit pension plan. The Pentegra Plan is treated as a multiemployer plan for accounting purposes but operates as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, certain multiemployer plan disclosures are not applicable to the Pentegra Plan. Under the Pentegra Plan, contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers because assets contributed by an employer are not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits only to employees of that employer. Also, in the event a participating employer is unable to meet its contribution requirements, the required contributions for the other participating employers could increase proportionately. The Pentegra Plan covers substantially all officers and employees of the Bank hired before March 1, 2011.
The Pentegra Plan operates on a fiscal year from July 1 through June 30. The Pentegra Plan files one Form 5500 on behalf of all employers who participate in the plan. The Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888, and the three-digit plan number is 333. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place at the Bank.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Pentegra Plan’s annual valuation process includes separately calculating the plan’s funded status and the funded status of each participating employer. The funded status is defined as the fair value of assets divided by the funding target (100 percent of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued at that date). As permitted by ERISA, the Pentegra Plan accepts contributions for the prior plan year up to eight and a half months after the asset valuation date. As a result, the fair value of assets at the valuation date (July 1) will increase by any subsequent contributions designated for the immediately preceding plan year ended June 30.
The most recent Form 5500 available for the Pentegra Plan is for the year ended June 30, 2019.2021. The contributions made by the Bank during 2020 and 20192022 were not more than five percent of the total contributions for each of the Pentegra Plan yearsyear ended June 30, 20192021, and 2018.contributions made during 2021 were not more than five percent of the total contributions for the Pentegra Plan year ended June 30, 2020.
The following table presents information on the net pension costs and funded status of the Pentegra Plan.
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefit expense for the year ended December 31 | Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefit expense for the year ended December 31 | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 24 | | Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefit expense for the year ended December 31 | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 31 | |
Pentegra Plan funded status as of July 1(1) | Pentegra Plan funded status as of July 1(1) | | 108.20 | % | | 108.62 | % | | 110.96 | % | Pentegra Plan funded status as of July 1(1) | | 118.87 | % | | 130.59 | % | | 108.50 | % |
| Bank’s funded status as of July 1 | Bank’s funded status as of July 1 | | 130.19 | % | | 119.41 | % | | 116.93 | % | Bank’s funded status as of July 1 | | 145.40 | % | | 157.71 | % | | 130.19 | % |
____________
(1) The Pentegra Plan’s funded status as of July 1 is preliminary and may increase because the plan’s participants are permitted to make contributions through March 15 of the following year (i.e. through March 15, 20212023 for the plan year ended June 30, 20202022 and through March 15, 20202022 for the plan year ended June 30, 2019)2021). Contributions made before the March 15th deadline may be credited to the plan for the plan year ended June 30 of the previous year and included in the final valuation as of July 1 of the year the plan ended. The final funded status as of July 1 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year July 1 through June 30 is filed. Form 5500 is due to be filed no later than April 2024 for the plan year July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 and April 2023 for the plan year July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. Form 5500 was filed in April 2022 for the plan year July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 and April 2021 for the plan year July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Form 5500 was filed in April 2020 for the plan year July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019.2021.
The Bank also participates in a qualified defined contribution plan. The Bank’s contribution to this plan is equal to a percentage of voluntary contributions, subject to certain limitations, plus contributions for all employees hired on or after March 1, 2011. The Bank contributed $3 to this plan during each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020.
The Bank offers a supplemental nonqualified defined contribution retirement plan to eligible executives. The Bank’s contribution to this plan is equal to a percentage of voluntary contributions. The Bank contributions to this plan were not material during each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020.
In addition, the Bank maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, available to Bank directors and officers at the senior vice president level and above, which is, in substance, an unfunded supplemental savings plan. The plan’s liability consists of the accumulated compensation deferrals and accrued earnings on those deferrals. The Bank’s minimum obligation from this plan was $6$4 and $5$6 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. Operating expense includes deferred compensation and accrued earnings that were not material for each of $1, $2, and $1 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018, respectively.2020.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Bank offers a supplemental nonqualified defined benefit pension plan to eligible executives and a postretirement health benefit plan to eligible retirees. There are no funded plan assets that have been designated to provide supplemental retirement plan or postretirement health benefits.
Amounts recognized in other liabilities (funded status) on the Statements of Condition for the Bank’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan and postretirement health benefit plan was $64$24 and $30 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021, respectively. The net periodic benefit costs recognized in “Compensation and benefits” on the Statements of Income for the Bank’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan and postretirement health benefit plan was $1, $2, and $1were not material for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, respectively.2020. The amount recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) related to pension and postretirement benefit plans on the Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Bank’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan and postretirement health benefit plan was income of $3, $2,$7, $9, and $3 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.
The financial amounts related to the Bank’s supplemental nonqualified defined benefit pension plan and postretirement health benefit plan are not material to the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 15—13—Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Nature of Business Activity
The Bank is exposed to interest-rate risk primarily from the effect of interest rate changes on its interest-earning assets and on its interest-bearing liabilities that finance these assets. To mitigate the risk of loss, the Bank has established policies and procedures, which include guidelines on the amount of exposure to interest rate changes that it is willing to accept. In addition, the Bank monitors the risk to its interest income, net interest margin, and average maturity of its interest-earning assets and funding sources. The goal of the Bank’s interest-rate risk management strategies is not to eliminate interest-rate risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits.
The Bank enters into derivatives to manage the interest-rate risk exposure that is inherent in its otherwise unhedged assets and funding sources, to achieve the Bank’s risk management objectives, and to act as an intermediary between its members and counterparties. Finance Agency regulations and the Bank’s risk management policy prohibit the trading or speculative use of these derivative instruments and limit credit risk arising from these instruments. The use of derivatives is an integral part of the Bank’s financial management strategy.
The most common ways in which the Bank uses derivatives are to:
•preserve a favorable interest-rate spread between the yield of an asset (e.g., an advance) and the cost of the related liability (e.g., the consolidated obligation bond used to fund the advance) by converting both fixed-rate instruments to a variable rate using interest-rate swaps;
•reduce funding costs by combining a derivative with a consolidated obligation because the cost of a combined funding structure can be lower than the cost of a comparable consolidated obligation bond;
•reduce the interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
•mitigate the adverse earnings effects from the shortening or lengthening of certain assets (e.g., mortgage assets) and liabilities;
•protect the value of existing asset or liability positions;
•manage embedded options in assets and liabilities; and
•achieve overall asset/liability management objectives.
Application of Derivatives
General. The Bank designates derivative instruments in the following three ways: (1) as a fair value hedge of an underlying financial instrument or a firm commitment; (2) as an intermediary transaction; or (3) as a non-qualifying hedge for purposes of asset or liability management.
The Bank reevaluates its hedging strategies from time to time and may change the hedging techniques it uses or adopt new strategies.
The Bank transacts most of its derivatives with counterparties that are large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute consolidated obligations. The Bank’s over-the-counter derivatives transactions may either be (1) uncleared derivatives, which are executed bilaterally with a counterparty; or (2) cleared derivatives, which are cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (clearing agent) with a Derivatives Clearing Organization (Clearinghouse).
Once a derivatives transaction has been accepted for clearing by a Clearinghouse, the derivatives transaction is novated, and the executing counterparty is replaced with the Clearinghouse as the counterparty. The Bank is not a derivatives dealer and does not trade derivatives for short-term profit.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Bank uses derivatives when they are considered to be the most cost-effective alternative to achieve the Bank’s long-term financial and risk management objectives. Accordingly, the Bank may enter into derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting (non-qualifying hedges).
Types of Derivatives
The Bank may use the following types of derivatives to reduce funding costs and to manage its exposure to interest-rate risks inherent in the normal course of business.
Interest-Rate Swaps. An interest-rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be exchanged and the manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. One of the simplest forms of an interest-rate swap involves the promise by one party to pay cash flows equivalent to the interest on a notional principal amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a given period of time. In return for this promise, this party receives cash flows equivalent to the interest on the same notional principal amount at a variable rate for the same period of time. The variable rate received or paid by the Bank in most derivative transaction agreements is LIBOR.SOFR or the overnight indexed swap rate.
Swaptions. A swaption is an option on a swap that gives the buyer the right to enter into a specified interest-rate swap at a certain time in the future. When used as a hedge, a swaption can protect the Bank against future interest rate changes when it is planning to lend or borrow funds in the future. The Bank may enter into both payer swaptions and receiver swaptions. A payer swaption is the option to make fixed interest payments at a later date, and a receiver swaption is the option to receive fixed interest payments at a later date.
Interest-Rate Cap and Floor Agreements. In an interest-rate cap agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or rate of an underlying variable rises above a certain threshold (or cap) price. In an interest-rate floor agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or rate of an underlying variable falls below a certain threshold (or floor) price. Caps may be used in conjunction with liabilities, and floors may be used in conjunction with assets. Caps and floors are designed to protect against the interest rate on a variable-rate asset or liability rising above or falling below a certain level.
Types of Hedged Items
At inception, the Bank documents all relationships between derivatives designated as hedging instruments and hedged items, its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions, and its method of assessing effectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges to (1) assets and liabilities on the Statements of Condition; or (2) firm commitments. The Bank also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and at least quarterly on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that it uses in hedging relationships have been effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain effective in future periods. The Bank uses regression analyses to assess the effectiveness of its hedges.
Advances. The Bank offers a variety of advance structures to meet members’ funding needs. These advances may have maturities of up to 30 years with variable or fixed rates and may include early termination features or options. The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and/or options characteristics of advances in order to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed- or a variable-rate advance with embedded options, the Bank simultaneously will execute a derivative with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. For example, the Bank may hedge a fixed-rate advance with an interest-rate swap in which the Bank pays a fixed-rate coupon and receives a variable-rate coupon, effectively converting the fixed-rate advance to a variable-rate advance. This type of hedge is typically treated as a fair-value hedge.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Mortgage Assets. The Bank has invested in mortgage assets. The prepayment options embedded in mortgage assets may shorten or lengthen the expected repayment of these investments, depending on changes in estimated prepayment speeds. The Bank manages the interest-rate and prepayment risk associated with mortgages through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank issues both callable and non-callable debt to achieve cash flow patterns and liability durations similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. The Bank may use derivatives to match the expected prepayment characteristics of the mortgages.
Options (interest-rate caps, interest-rate floors and/or options) also may be used to hedge prepayment risk on the mortgages. Many options are not identified to specific mortgages and therefore, do not receive fair-value or cash-flow hedge accounting treatment. The Bank also may purchase interest-rate caps and floors, swaptions, callable swaps, calls, and puts to minimize the prepayment risk embedded in the mortgage loans. Although these derivatives are valid non-qualifying hedges against the prepayment risk of the loans, they do not receive either fair-value or cash-flow hedge accounting. These derivatives are marked-to-market through earnings.
Consolidated Obligations. While consolidated obligations are the joint and several obligations of the FHLBanks, each FHLBank has consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. The Bank enters into derivatives to hedge the interest-rate risk associated with its specific debt issuances in conjunction with the associated interest-rate risk on advances. The Bank manages the risk arising from changing market prices and volatility of a consolidated obligation by matching the cash inflow on the derivative with the cash outflow on the consolidated obligation. For instance, in a typical transaction, fixed-rate consolidated obligations are issued for the Bank, and the Bank simultaneously enters into a matching derivative in which the counterparty pays fixed cash flows to the Bank designed to mirror cash outflows that the Bank pays on the consolidated obligation in timing and amount. The Bank pays a variable cash flow that closely matches the interest payments it receives on short-term or variable-rate advances. These transactions are typically treated as fair-value hedges. This intermediation between the capital and swap markets permits the Bank to raise funds at lower costs than otherwise would be available through the issuance of simple fixed-rate consolidated obligations in the capital markets.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Advances. The Bank offers a variety of advance structures to meet members’ funding needs. These advances may have maturities of up to 30 years with variable or fixed rates and may include early termination features or options. The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and/or options characteristics of advances in order to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed- or a variable-rate advance with embedded options, the Bank simultaneously will execute a derivative with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. For example, the Bank may hedge a fixed-rate advance with an interest-rate swap in which the Bank pays a fixed-rate coupon and receives a variable-rate coupon, effectively converting the fixed-rate advance to a variable-rate advance. This type of hedge is typically treated as a fair-value hedge.
Mortgage Assets. The Bank has invested in mortgage assets. The prepayment options embedded in mortgage assets may shorten or lengthen the expected repayment of these investments, depending on changes in estimated prepayment speeds. The Bank manages the interest-rate and prepayment risk associated with mortgages through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank issues both callable and non-callable debt to achieve cash flow patterns and liability durations similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. The Bank may use derivatives to match the expected prepayment characteristics of the mortgages.
Options (interest-rate caps, interest-rate floors and/or options) also may be used to hedge prepayment risk on the mortgages. Many options are not identified to specific mortgages and therefore, do not receive fair-value or cash-flow hedge accounting treatment. The Bank also may purchase interest-rate caps and floors, swaptions, callable swaps, calls, and puts to minimize the prepayment risk embedded in the mortgage loans. Although these derivatives are valid non-qualifying hedges against the prepayment risk of the loans, they do not receive either fair-value or cash-flow hedge accounting. These derivatives are marked-to-market through earnings.
Firm Commitments. Certain mortgage loan purchase commitments are considered derivatives. Mortgage purchase commitments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in current-period earnings. When the mortgage purchase commitment derivative settles, the current fair value of the commitment is included with the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.
The Bank also may enter into a fair value hedge of a firm commitment for a forward starting advance through the use of an interest-rate swap. In this case, the swap functions as the hedging instrument for both the firm commitment and the subsequent advance. The basis movement associated with the firm commitment is recorded as a basis adjustment of the advance at the time the commitment is terminated and the advance is issued. The basis adjustment is then amortized into interest income over the life of the advance using the level-yield method.
Investments. The Bank invests in MBS, U.S. agency obligations, certificates of deposit, and the taxable portion of state or local housing finance agency obligations. The interest-rate and prepayment risk associated with these investment securities are managed through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank may manage the prepayment and interest-rate risks by funding investment securities with consolidated obligations that have call features, by hedging the prepayment risk with caps or floors, or by adjusting the duration of the securities by using derivatives to modify the cash flows of the securities. Investment securities may be classified as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity.
The Bank also may manage the risk arising from changing market prices and volatility of investment securities classified as trading by entering into derivatives (non-qualifying hedges) that offset the changes in fair value of these securities.
Financial Statement Effect and Additional Financial Information
Derivative Notional Amounts. The notional amount of derivatives serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. However, the notional amount of derivatives represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the Bank to credit and market risk; the overall risk is much smaller. The risks of derivatives can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis that takes into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged, and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the notional amount, fair value of derivative instruments, and total derivative assets and liabilities. Total derivative assets and liabilities include the effect of netting adjustments and cash collateral. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and the related accrued interest.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Notional
Amount of Derivatives | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Notional
Amount of Derivatives | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Notional
Amount of Derivatives | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Notional
Amount of Derivatives | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities |
| Derivatives in hedging relationships: | Derivatives in hedging relationships: | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivatives in hedging relationships: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-rate swaps (1) | Interest-rate swaps (1) | $ | 28,001 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 502 | | | $ | 73,637 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 221 | | Interest-rate swaps (1) | $ | 77,673 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 2,506 | | | $ | 46,340 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 453 | |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-rate swaps (1) | Interest-rate swaps (1) | 121 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 478 | | | 5 | | | 1 | | Interest-rate swaps (1) | 63 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 64 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| | Interest-rate caps or floors | Interest-rate caps or floors | 7,000 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 7,084 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Interest-rate caps or floors | 4,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,000 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| | Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | 7,121 | | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 7,562 | | | 5 | | | 1 | | Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | 4,063 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 4,064 | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
| Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments | Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments | $ | 35,122 | | | 7 | | | 504 | | | $ | 81,199 | | | 76 | | | 222 | | Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments | $ | 81,736 | | | 47 | | | 2,507 | | | $ | 50,404 | | | 4 | | | 455 | |
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (2) | Netting adjustments and cash collateral (2) | | | 384 | | | (493) | | | | | 304 | | | (215) | | Netting adjustments and cash collateral (2) | | | 232 | | | (2,482) | | | | | 327 | | | (433) | |
| Derivative assets and derivative liabilities | Derivative assets and derivative liabilities | | $ | 391 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 7 | | Derivative assets and derivative liabilities | | $ | 279 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 331 | | | $ | 22 | |
___________
(1)Includes variation margin for daily settled contracts of $1,065negative $739 and $503positive $300 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
(2) Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents and/or counterparty. Cash collateral posted, including accrued interest, was $878$2,714 and $543$759 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. CashThe Bank did not receive any cash collateral, received, including accrued interest, was $0 and $25 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, respectively.2021.
As a result of adopting new accounting guidance related to derivatives and hedging activities, on January 1, 2019, changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk for designated fair value hedges are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2019, for fair value hedges, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedge item) was recorded in noninterest income as net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities.
The following tables present the net (losses) gains (losses) on fair value hedging relationships.
| | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| | Interest Income (Expense) | | Interest Income (Expense) |
| | Advances | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes | | Advances | | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes |
| Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 870 | | | $ | (582) | | | $ | (357) | | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 1,748 | | | | $ | (1,345) | | | $ | (805) | |
| Changes in fair value: | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | | |
| Hedged items | Hedged items | | $ | 922 | | | $ | (18) | | | $ | 0 | | Hedged items | | (1,105) | | | | 2,226 | | | 10 | |
| Derivatives | Derivatives | | (886) | | | 20 | | | 0 | | Derivatives | | 1,318 | | | | (2,222) | | | (9) | |
| Net changes in fair value | Net changes in fair value | | 36 | | | 2 | | | 0 | | Net changes in fair value | | 213 | | | | 4 | | | 1 | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | (341) | | | 41 | | | 39 | | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | (17) | | | | (187) | | | — | |
| Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | (56) | | | (2) | | | 0 | | Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | (185) | | | | (12) | | | (32) | |
| | Other | Other | | (4) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Other | | 4 | | | | — | | | — | |
| | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | $ | (365) | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 39 | | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | $ | 15 | | | | $ | (195) | | | $ | (31) | |
____________
(1) Represents interest income/expense on derivatives in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships. Net interest settlements on derivatives that are not in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships are reported in other income.
(2) Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| | Advances | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes | | Advances | | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | |
| Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 2,451 | | | $ | (1,808) | | | $ | (1,371) | | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 306 | | | | $ | (155) | | |
| Changes in fair value: | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | |
Hedged items (2) | Hedged items (2) | | $ | 693 | | | $ | (176) | | | $ | 0 | | Hedged items (2) | | $ | (905) | | | | $ | 309 | | |
| Derivatives | Derivatives | | (682) | | | 174 | | | 0 | | Derivatives | | 1,030 | | | | (317) | | |
| Net changes in fair value | Net changes in fair value | | 11 | | | (2) | | | 0 | | Net changes in fair value | | 125 | | | | (8) | | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | 21 | | | (32) | | | 0 | | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | (331) | | | | 113 | | |
| Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | (28) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | (99) | | | | — | | |
| Other | Other | | 0 | | | (1) | | | 0 | | Other | | (19) | | | | — | | |
| Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | $ | 4 | | | $ | (35) | | | $ | 0 | | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | $ | (324) | | | | $ | 105 | | |
____________
(1) Represents interest income/expense on derivatives in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships. Net interest settlements on derivatives that are not in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships are reported in other income.
(2) Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items.
| | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (1) | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| | Advances | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes | | Advances | | | Consolidated Obligation Bonds | | Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes |
| Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 2,227 | | | $ | (1,604) | | | $ | (1,139) | | Total interest income (expense) recorded in the Statements of Income | | $ | 870 | | | | $ | (582) | | | $ | (357) | |
| Changes in fair value: | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | | Changes in fair value: | | | | | | | |
Hedged items (2) | Hedged items (2) | | $ | (124) | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | (2) | | Hedged items (2) | | $ | 922 | | | | $ | (18) | | | $ | — | |
| Derivatives | Derivatives | | 156 | | | (58) | | | 1 | | Derivatives | | (886) | | | | 20 | | | — | |
| Net changes in fair value | Net changes in fair value | | 32 | | | 1 | | | (1) | | Net changes in fair value | | 36 | | | | 2 | | | — | |
| Net effect of derivatives on net interest income | | $ | (20) | | | $ | (40) | | | $ | (2) | | |
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | Net interest settlements on derivatives (1) (2) | | $ | (341) | | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 39 | |
| Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | Amortization/accretion of active hedging relationships | | (56) | | | | (2) | | | — | |
| Other | | Other | | (4) | | | | — | | | — | |
| Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | Total net interest income effect from fair value hedging relationships | | $ | (365) | | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 39 | |
____________
(1) Prior period amounts wereRepresents interest income/expense on derivatives in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships. Net interest settlements on derivatives that are not conformed to the new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships are reported in other income.
(2)Prior period amounts do not included amortization on Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items.
The following tables present the total basis adjustments on hedged items designated as fair value hedges and the related amortized cost of the hedged items.
| | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| Line Item in Statement of Conditions of Hedged Item | Line Item in Statement of Conditions of Hedged Item | | Amortized Cost of Hedged Asset or Liability (1) | | Basis Adjustments for Active Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost | | Basis Adjustments for Discontinued Hedging Relationships included in Amortized Cost | | Total Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments | Line Item in Statement of Conditions of Hedged Item | | Amortized Cost of Hedged Asset or Liability (1) | | Basis Adjustments for Active Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost | | Basis Adjustments for Discontinued Hedging Relationships included in Amortized Cost | | Total Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments |
| Advances | Advances | | $ | 25,380 | | | $ | 1,529 | | | $ | 55 | | | $ | 1,584 | | Advances | | $ | 18,533 | | | $ | (711) | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | (715) | |
| Available-for-sale Securities | | Available-for-sale Securities | | 100 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Consolidated obligations: | Consolidated obligations: | | Consolidated obligations: | |
| Bonds | Bonds | | 1,555 | | | 56 | | | 0 | | | 56 | | Bonds | | 48,521 | | | (2,461) | | | (6) | | | (2,467) | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | | 1,122 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Discount notes | | 11,475 | | | (10) | | | — | | | (10) | |
____________
(1) Includes only the portion of amortized cost representing the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2019 |
| Line Item in Statement of Conditions of Hedged Item | | Amortized Cost of Hedged Asset or Liability (1) | | Basis Adjustments for Active Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost | | Basis Adjustments for Discontinued Hedging Relationships included in Amortized Cost | | Total Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments |
| Advances | | $ | 29,984 | | | $ | 716 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 725 | |
| Consolidated obligations: | | | | | | | | |
| Bonds | | 26,348 | | | 36 | | | 0 | | | 36 | |
| Discount notes | | 17,742 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2021 |
| Line Item in Statement of Conditions of Hedged Item | | Amortized Cost of Hedged Asset or Liability (1) | | Basis Adjustments for Active Hedging Relationships Included in Amortized Cost | | Basis Adjustments for Discontinued Hedging Relationships included in Amortized Cost | | Total Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments |
| Advances | | $ | 21,293 | | | $ | 492 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 561 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated obligation Bonds | | 25,256 | | | (252) | | | (1) | | | (253) | |
| | | | | | | | |
____________
(1) Includes only the portion of amortized cost representing the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships.
The following table presents net gains (losses) gains related toon derivatives and hedging activities recorded in noninterest income on the Statements of Income. For fair value hedging relationships, the portion of net gains (losses) representing hedge ineffectiveness are recorded in noninterest income (loss) for periods prior to January 1, 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Derivatives and hedged items in fair value hedging relationships: | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate swaps | | N/A (1) | | N/A (1) | | $ | 32 | |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate swaps | | $ | (4) | | | $ | (3) | | | 1 | |
| Interest-rate caps or floors | | 0 | | | (1) | | | 0 | |
| Net interest settlements | | (2) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total net (losses) gains related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | (6) | | | (4) | | | 1 | |
Price alignment amount (2) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (4) | |
| Net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities | | $ | (6) | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | 29 | |
__________
(1) Not applicable due to new hedge accounting guidance adopted January 1, 2019.
(2) This amount is for derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate swaps | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (4) | |
| | | | | | |
| Net interest settlements | | 2 | | | — | | | (2) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on derivatives | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (6) | |
Managing Credit Risk on Derivatives
The Bank is subject to credit risk to its derivative transactions due to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties and manages this risk through credit analysis, collateral requirements, and adherence to the requirements set forth in its policies, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations, and Finance Agency regulations.
For uncleared derivatives, the degree of credit risk depends on the extent to which master netting arrangements are included in such contracts to mitigate the risk. The Bank requires collateral agreements with collateral delivery thresholds on all uncleared derivatives. Additionally, collateral related to derivatives with member institutions includes collateral assigned to the Bank, as evidenced by a written security agreement, and held by the member institution for the benefit of the Bank.
Certain of the Bank’s uncleared derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Bank to post additional collateral with its counterparties if there is deterioration in the Bank’s credit rating. If the Bank’s credit rating is lowered by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), the Bank may be required to deliver additional collateral on uncleared derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest) as of December 31, 2020 was $8, for which the Bank was not required to post collateral as of December 31, 2020. If the Bank’s credit ratings had been lowered from its current rating to the next lower rating, the Bank would have been required to deliver $3 of collateral at fair value to its uncleared derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2020.
For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse is the Bank’s counterparty. The Clearinghouse notifies the clearing agent of the required initial and variation margin, and the clearing agent notifies the Bank. The Bank utilizes two Clearinghouses for all cleared derivative transactions, CME Clearing and LCH Ltd. At both Clearinghouses, variation margin is characterized as daily settlement payments, and initial margin is considered cash collateral. Because the Bank is required to post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent to the Clearinghouse, it exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk if the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives is intended to mitigate credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties, and collateral/payments is posted daily through a clearing agent for changes in the fair value of cleared derivatives. The Bank has analyzed the enforceability of offsetting rights incorporated in its cleared derivative transactions and determined that the exercise of those offsetting rights by a non-defaulting party under these transactions should be upheld under applicable law upon an event of default, including a bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar proceeding involving the Clearinghouse or the Bank’s clearing agent, or both. Based on this analysis, the Bank presents a net derivative receivable or payable for all of its transactions through a particular clearing agent with a particular Clearinghouse.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Bank presents derivative instruments and the related cash collateral that is received or pledged, plus the associated accrued interest, on a net basis by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when it has met the netting requirements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments meeting or not meeting netting requirements, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities | | Derivative Assets | | Derivative Liabilities |
| Gross recognized amount: | Gross recognized amount: | | | | | | | | Gross recognized amount: | | | | | | | |
| Uncleared derivatives | Uncleared derivatives | $ | 6 | | | $ | 493 | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 219 | | Uncleared derivatives | $ | 21 | | | $ | 2,496 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 451 | |
| Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | 1 | | | 11 | | | 17 | | | 3 | | Cleared derivatives | 26 | | | 11 | | | — | | | 4 | |
| Total gross recognized amount | Total gross recognized amount | 7 | | | 504 | | | 76 | | | 222 | | Total gross recognized amount | 47 | | | 2,507 | | | 4 | | | 455 | |
| Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | | | | | | | | Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | | | | | | | |
| Uncleared derivatives | Uncleared derivatives | (2) | | | (482) | | | (47) | | | (212) | | Uncleared derivatives | (19) | | | (2,471) | | | (3) | | | (429) | |
| Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | 386 | | | (11) | | | 351 | | | (3) | | Cleared derivatives | 251 | | | (11) | | | 330 | | | (4) | |
| Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | 384 | | | (493) | | | 304 | | | (215) | | Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral: | 232 | | | (2,482) | | | 327 | | | (433) | |
| Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral: | Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral: | | | | | | | | Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral: | | | | | | | |
| Uncleared derivatives | Uncleared derivatives | 4 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 7 | | Uncleared derivatives | 2 | | | 25 | | | 1 | | | 22 | |
| Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | 387 | | | 0 | | | 368 | | | 0 | | Cleared derivatives | 277 | | | — | | | 330 | | | — | |
| Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral | Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral | 391 | | | 11 | | | 380 | | | 7 | | Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral | 279 | | | 25 | | | 331 | | | 22 | |
Non-cash collateral received or pledged not offset- cannot be sold or repledged: (1) | Non-cash collateral received or pledged not offset- cannot be sold or repledged: (1) | | | | | | | | Non-cash collateral received or pledged not offset- cannot be sold or repledged: (1) | | | | | | | |
| Uncleared derivatives | Uncleared derivatives | 1 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | Uncleared derivatives | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Cleared derivatives | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total cannot be sold or repledged (1) | Total cannot be sold or repledged (1) | 1 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | Total cannot be sold or repledged (1) | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net unsecured amounts: (1) | Net unsecured amounts: (1) | | | | | | | | Net unsecured amounts: (1) | | | | | | | |
| Uncleared derivatives | Uncleared derivatives | 3 | | | 11 | | | 8 | | | 7 | | Uncleared derivatives | 2 | | | 25 | | | 1 | | | 22 | |
| Cleared derivatives | Cleared derivatives | 387 | | | 0 | | | 368 | | | 0 | | Cleared derivatives | 277 | | | — | | | 330 | | | — | |
Total net unsecured amount (1) | Total net unsecured amount (1) | $ | 390 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 376 | | | $ | 7 | | Total net unsecured amount (1) | $ | 279 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 331 | | | $ | 22 | |
_______________
(1)The Bank hadBank’s net credit exposure of $3 and $6was not material as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019, respectively,2021, due to instances where the Bank’s pledged collateral to a counterparty exceeded the Bank’s net derivative liability position._________
Note 16—14—Estimated Fair Values
The Bank records trading securities, available-for-sale securities, derivative assets and liabilities, and grantor trust assets (publicly-traded mutual funds) at estimated fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined under GAAP as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. In general, the transaction price will equal the exit price and therefore, represents the fair value of the asset or liability at initial recognition. In determining whether a transaction price represents the fair value of the asset or liability at initial recognition, each reporting entity is required to consider factors specific to the transaction, the asset or liability, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, and market participants with whom the entity would transact in the market.
A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The inputs are evaluated, and an overall level for the fair value measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of how market-observablemarket observability of the fair value measurement isfor the asset or liability and defines the level of disclosure. In order to determine the fair value or the exit price, entities must determine the unit of account, highest and best use, principal market, and market participants. These determinations allow the reporting entity to define the inputs for fair value and level of hierarchy.
Outlined below is the application of the “fair value hierarchy” to the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. The Bank carried grantor trust assets at fair value hierarchy Level 1 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. The Bank carried tradingavailable-for-sale securities and derivatives at fair value hierarchy Level 2 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
Level 3 - unobservable inputs tofor the valuation methodologyasset or liability. Valuations are unobservable andderived from techniques that use significant toassumptions not observable in the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs are supported by limited market, activity and reflect the entity’s own assumptions.which include pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or similar techniques. The Bank carried available-for-sale securitiesdid not carry any financial assets or liabilities, measured on a recurring basis, at fair value hierarchy Level 3 as of December 31, 2019.2022 and 2021.
The Bank utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
For financial instruments carried at fair value, the Bank reviews the fair value hierarchy classification of financial assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. There were no such transfers during the periods presented.
Estimated Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis. The following tables present, for each fair value hierarchy level, the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis on its Statements of Condition.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2020 |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1) | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury obligations | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,500 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,500 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 0 | | | 62 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 62 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total trading securities | 0 | | | 1,562 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,562 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative assets: | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate related | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 384 | | | 391 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Grantor trust (included in Other assets) | 74 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 74 | |
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 74 | | | $ | 1,569 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 384 | | | $ | 2,027 | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate related | $ | 0 | | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (493) | | | $ | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 0 | | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (493) | | | $ | 11 | |
____________
(1) Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents and/or counterparty.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2019 |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1) | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury Obligations | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,499 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,499 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | 0 | | | 59 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 59 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total trading securities | 0 | | | 1,558 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,558 | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Private-label residential MBS | 0 | | | 0 | | | 684 | | | 0 | | | 684 | |
| Derivative assets: | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate related | 0 | | | 76 | | | 0 | | | 304 | | | 380 | |
| Grantor trust (included in Other assets) | 68 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 68 | |
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 68 | | | $ | 1,634 | | | $ | 684 | | | $ | 304 | | | $ | 2,690 | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate related | $ | 0 | | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (215) | | | $ | 7 | |
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 0 | | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (215) | | | $ | 7 | |
____________
(1) Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents and/or counterparty.
The following table presents a reconciliation of available-for-sale securities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 684 | | | $ | 865 | | | $ | 1,104 | |
Total (losses) gains realized and unrealized: (1) | | | | | |
| Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities | 82 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | 0 | | | (13) | | | (3) | |
| Included in other comprehensive income | (41) | | | (31) | | | (62) | |
| Accretion of credit losses in net interest income | 1 | | | 51 | | | 62 | |
| Sales | (726) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Settlements | 0 | | | (188) | | | (236) | |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 0 | | | $ | 684 | | | $ | 865 | |
____________
(1)Related to available-for-sale securities held at year end.
Described below are the Bank’s fair value measurement methodologies
applied for financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis on the
Statements of Condition and categorized within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investment securities. The Bank obtains prices from multiple designated third-party pricing vendors, when available, to estimate the fair value of its investment securities. The pricing vendors use various proprietary models to price investment securities. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources including, but not limited to, the following: benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data. Since many investment securities do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use available information as applicable, such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing to determine the prices for individual securities. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all investment securities valuations, which facilitates resolution of potentially erroneous prices identified by the Bank.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The Bank periodically conducts periodic reviews of its pricing vendors to confirm and further augment its understanding of the vendors’ pricing processes, methodologies, and control procedures for U.S. agency MBS.
The Bank’s valuation technique for estimating the fair value of its investment securities first requires the establishment of a “median” price for each security.
All prices that are within a specified tolerance threshold of the median price are included in the “cluster” of prices that are averaged to compute a “resultant” price. All prices that are outside the threshold (“outliers”)(outliers) are subject to further analysis (including, but not limited to, comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities, and/or non-binding dealer estimates) to determine if an outlier is a better estimate of fair value. If an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is determined to be a better estimate of fair value, then the outlier (or the other price as appropriate) is used as the final price rather than the resultant price. Alternatively, if the analysis does not provide evidence that an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is more representative of the fair value, and the resultant price is the best estimate, then the resultant price is used as the final price. In all cases, the final price is used to determine the fair value of the security.security
If all prices received for a security are outside the tolerance threshold level of the median price, then there is no resultant price, and the final price is determined by an evaluation of all outlier prices as described above.
Multiple third-party vendor prices were received for a majority of the Bank’s investment securities holdings, and the final prices for those securities were computed by averaging the prices received as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. Based on the Bank’s review of the pricing methods and controls employed by the third-party pricing vendors and the relative lack of dispersion among the vendor prices (or the Bank’s additional analysis in those instances in which there were outliers or significant yield variances), the Bank believes that its final prices are representative of the prices that would have been received if the assets had
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
been sold at the measurement date (i.e., exit prices) and further, that the fair value measurements are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy. Based on the lack of significant market activity for private-label MBS, the fair value measurement for those securities were classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Derivative assets and liabilities. The Bank calculates the fair values of interest-rate related derivatives using a discounted cash flow analysis which utilizes market-observable inputs. The significant assumptions used in this model are based on management’s best estimate of discount rates, market indices, and market volatility. The inputs for interest-rate related derivatives uses the SOFR swap curve for the discounting of cleared derivatives and the Overnight Index Swap curve for the discounting of collateralized derivatives.
Derivative instruments are transacted primarily in the institutional dealer market and priced with observable market assumptions at a mid-market valuation point. The Bank does not provide a credit valuation adjustment based on aggregate exposure by derivative counterparty when measuring the fair value of its derivatives. This is because the collateral provisions pertaining to the Bank’s derivatives should obviate the need to provide such a credit valuation adjustment. The fair values of the Bank’s derivatives take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements, where applicable, that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions and offset cash collateral with the same counterparty on a net basis. The Bank and each uncleared derivative counterparty have collateral thresholds that take into account both the Bank’s and the counterparty’s credit ratings. As a result of these practices and agreements, the Bank has concluded that the impact of the credit differential between the Bank and its derivative counterparties was mitigated to an immaterial level, and no further adjustments were deemed necessary to the recorded fair values of derivative assets and liabilities on the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Bank using available market information and the Bank’s best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to the Bank as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair values of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique or valuation methodology. For example, because an active secondary market does not exist for a portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, in certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change as economic and market factors and evaluation of those factors change. Therefore, these estimated fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in current market transactions although they do reflect the Bank’s judgment of how a market participant would estimate the fair value. The fair value tables presented below do not represent an estimate of the overall fair value of the Bank as a going concern, which would need to take into account future business opportunities and the net profitability of assets versus liabilities.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | | As of December 31, 2020 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Estimated Fair Value |
| | Carrying Value | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1) | | Carrying Value | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (2) |
| Assets: | Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and due from banks | Cash and due from banks | $ | 2,905 | | | $ | 2,905 | | | $ | 2,905 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | — | | Cash and due from banks | $ | 141 | | | $ | 141 | | | $ | 141 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,644 | | | 1,644 | | | 0 | | | 1,644 | | | 0 | | | — | | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,277 | | | 1,277 | | | — | | | 1,277 | | | | — | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 9,500 | | | 9,500 | | | 0 | | | 9,500 | | | 0 | | | — | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 6,250 | | | 6,250 | | | — | | | 6,250 | | | | — | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | 3,270 | | | 3,270 | | | 0 | | | 3,270 | | | 0 | | | — | | Federal funds sold | 8,036 | | | 8,036 | | | — | | | 8,036 | | | | — | |
| Trading securities | 1,562 | | | 1,562 | | | 0 | | | 1,562 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Available-for-sale securities (1) | | Available-for-sale securities (1) | 2,713 | | | 2,713 | | | — | | | 2,713 | | | | — | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | Held-to-maturity securities | 20,404 | | | 20,489 | | | 0 | | | 20,489 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Held-to-maturity securities | 22,626 | | | 22,140 | | | — | | | 22,140 | | | | — | |
| Advances | Advances | 52,168 | | | 52,610 | | | 0 | | | 52,610 | | | 0 | | | — | | Advances | 109,595 | | | 109,424 | | | — | | | 109,424 | | | | — | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 218 | | | 234 | | | 0 | | | 234 | | | 0 | | | — | | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 120 | | | 115 | | | — | | | 115 | | | | — | |
| | Accrued interest receivable | Accrued interest receivable | 88 | | | 88 | | | 0 | | | 88 | | | 0 | | | — | | Accrued interest receivable | 477 | | | 477 | | | — | | | 477 | | | | — | |
Derivative assets | Derivative assets | 391 | | | 391 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 384 | | Derivative assets | 279 | | | 279 | | | — | | | 47 | | | | 232 | |
Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | 74 | | | 74 | | | 74 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | — | | Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | 29 | | | 29 | | | 29 | | | — | | | | — | |
| Liabilities: | Liabilities: | | Liabilities: | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,998 | | | 1,998 | | | 0 | | | 1,998 | | | 0 | | | — | | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,821 | | | 1,821 | | | — | | | 1,821 | | | | — | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | Consolidated obligations, net: | | Consolidated obligations, net: | | | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | 25,385 | | | 25,387 | | | 0 | | | 25,387 | | | 0 | | | — | | Discount notes | 39,781 | | | 39,776 | | | — | | | 39,776 | | | | — | |
| Bonds | Bonds | 59,379 | | | 59,835 | | | 0 | | | 59,835 | | | 0 | | | — | | Bonds | 101,729 | | | 101,240 | | | — | | | 101,240 | | | | — | |
| Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| | Accrued interest payable | Accrued interest payable | 45 | | | 45 | | | 0 | | | 45 | | | 0 | | | — | | Accrued interest payable | 481 | | | 481 | | | — | | | 481 | | | | — | |
Derivative liabilities | Derivative liabilities | 11 | | | 11 | | | 0 | | | 504 | | | 0 | | | (493) | | Derivative liabilities | 25 | | | 25 | | | — | | | 2,507 | | | | (2,482) | |
____________
(1)Financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
(2) Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents and/or counterparty.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| | | | As of December 31, 2019 | | As of December 31, 2021 |
| | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Estimated Fair Value |
| | Carrying Value | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (1) | | Carrying Value | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral (2) |
| Assets: | Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and due from banks | Cash and due from banks | $ | 911 | | | $ | 911 | | | $ | 911 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | — | | Cash and due from banks | $ | 879 | | | $ | 879 | | | $ | 879 | | | $ | — | | | | $ | — | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 3,810 | | | 3,810 | | | 0 | | | 3,810 | | | 0 | | | — | | Interest-bearing deposits | 688 | | | 688 | | | — | | | 688 | | | | — | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 8,800 | | | 8,800 | | | 0 | | | 8,800 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Securities purchased under agreements to resell | 7,000 | | | 7,000 | | | — | | | 7,000 | | | | — | |
| Federal funds sold | Federal funds sold | 9,826 | | | 9,826 | | | 0 | | | 9,826 | | | 0 | | | — | | Federal funds sold | 6,420 | | | 6,420 | | | — | | | 6,420 | | | | — | |
| Trading securities | 1,558 | | | 1,558 | | | 0 | | | 1,558 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Available-for-sale securities | Available-for-sale securities | 684 | | | 684 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 684 | | | 0 | | Available-for-sale securities | 2,639 | | | 2,639 | | | — | | | 2,639 | | | | — | |
| Held-to-maturity securities | Held-to-maturity securities | 25,939 | | | 25,903 | | | 0 | | | 25,711 | | | 192 | | | 0 | | Held-to-maturity securities | 15,074 | | | 15,099 | | | — | | | 15,099 | | | | — | |
| Advances | Advances | 97,167 | | | 97,365 | | | 0 | | | 97,365 | | | 0 | | | — | | Advances | 45,415 | | | 45,635 | | | — | | | 45,635 | | | | — | |
| Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 296 | | | 324 | | | 0 | | | 324 | | | 0 | | | — | | Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net | 149 | | | 161 | | | — | | | 161 | | | | — | |
| | Accrued interest receivable | Accrued interest receivable | 259 | | | 259 | | | 0 | | | 259 | | | 0 | | | — | | Accrued interest receivable | 57 | | | 57 | | | — | | | 57 | | | | — | |
Derivative assets | Derivative assets | 380 | | | 380 | | | 0 | | | 76 | | | 0 | | | 304 | | Derivative assets | 331 | | | 331 | | | — | | | 4 | | | | 327 | |
Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | 68 | | | 68 | | | 68 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | — | | Grantor trust assets (included in Other assets) | 35 | | | 35 | | | 35 | | | — | | | | — | |
| Liabilities: | Liabilities: | | Liabilities: | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits | Interest-bearing deposits | 1,492 | | | 1,492 | | | 0 | | | 1,492 | | | 0 | | | — | | Interest-bearing deposits | 2,054 | | | 2,054 | | | — | | | 2,054 | | | | — | |
| Consolidated obligations, net: | Consolidated obligations, net: | | Consolidated obligations, net: | | | |
| Discount notes | Discount notes | 52,134 | | | 52,138 | | | 0 | | | 52,138 | | | 0 | | | — | | Discount notes | 25,506 | | | 25,506 | | | — | | | 25,506 | | | | — | |
Bonds | Bonds | 88,503 | | | 88,764 | | | 0 | | | 88,764 | | | 0 | | | — | | Bonds | 46,186 | | | 46,338 | | | — | | | 46,338 | | | | — | |
| Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Mandatorily redeemable capital stock | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | — | | | | — | |
| Accrued interest payable | Accrued interest payable | 212 | | | 212 | | | 0 | | | 212 | | | 0 | | | — | | Accrued interest payable | 72 | | | 72 | | | — | | | 72 | | | | — | |
Derivative liabilities | Derivative liabilities | 7 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 222 | | | 0 | | | (215) | | Derivative liabilities | 22 | | | 22 | | | — | | | 455 | | | | (433) | |
____________
(1)Financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
(2)Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the Bank to settle positive and negative positions, and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agents and/or counterparty.
Note 17—15—Commitments and Contingencies
Consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. At any time, the Finance Agency may require any FHLBank to make principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation, whether or not the primary obligor FHLBank has defaulted on the payment of that obligation. No FHLBank has ever had to assume or pay the consolidated obligation of another FHLBank.
The par value of the other FHLBanks’ outstanding consolidated obligations for which the Bank is jointly and severally liable was $662,051$1,037,537 and $885,114$580,909 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, exclusive of the Bank’s own outstanding consolidated obligations. None of the other FHLBanks defaulted on their consolidated obligations, the Finance Agency was not required to allocate any obligation among the FHLBanks, and no amount of the joint and several obligation was fixed as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. Accordingly, the Bank has not recognized a liability for its joint and several obligation related to the other FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the Bank’s outstanding commitments, which represent off-balance sheet obligations.
| | | As of December 31, | | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | Expire Within One Year | | Expire After One Year | | Total | | Expire Within One Year | | Expire After One Year | | Total | | Expire Within One Year | | Expire After One Year | | Total | | Expire Within One Year | | Expire After One Year | | Total |
Standby letters of credit (1) | Standby letters of credit (1) | | $ | 9,287 | | | $ | 6,754 | | | $ | 16,041 | | | $ | 8,532 | | | $ | 23,973 | | | $ | 32,505 | | Standby letters of credit (1) | | $ | 3,103 | | | $ | 5,943 | | | $ | 9,046 | | | $ | 3,757 | | | $ | 3,914 | | | $ | 7,671 | |
| Commitments to fund additional advances | Commitments to fund additional advances | | 10 | | | 107 | | | 117 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Commitments to fund additional advances | | 318 | | | — | | | 318 | | | 96 | | | 38 | | | 134 | |
Unsettled consolidated obligation bonds, at par (2) | Unsettled consolidated obligation bonds, at par (2) | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | Unsettled consolidated obligation bonds, at par (2) | | 5,277 | | | — | | | 5,277 | | | 80 | | | — | | | 80 | |
| Unsettled consolidated obligation discount notes, at par (2) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2,000 | | | 0 | | | 2,000 | | |
|
____________
(1)“Expire Within One Year” includes 1522 standby letters of credit for a total of $19$49 and 1319 standby letters of credit for a total of $36$15 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, which have no stated maturity date and are subject to renewal on an annual basis.
(2)Expiration is based on settlement period rather than underlying contractual maturity of consolidated obligations.
The Bank issues standby letters of credit on behalf of its members to support certain obligations of the members to third-party beneficiaries. Standby letters of credit may be offered to assist members and non-member housing associates in facilitating residential housing finance, community lending, and asset-liability management, and to provide liquidity. In particular, members often use standby letters of credit as collateral for deposits from federal and state government agencies. Standby letters of credit are executed for members for a fee. If the Bank is required to make a payment for a beneficiary's draw, the member either reimburses the Bank for the amount drawn or, subject to the Bank's discretion, the amount drawn may be converted into a collateralized advance to the member and will require a corresponding activity-based capital stock purchase. However, standby letters of credit usually expire without being drawn upon.
The carrying value of the guarantees related to standby letters of credit is recorded in “Other liabilities” on the Statements of Condition and amounted to $30$22 and $117$16 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
The Bank’s operating expenses include net rental costs of $1 for each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020. Lease agreements for Bank premises generally provide for increases in the basic rentals resulting from increases in property taxes and maintenance expenses. Such increases are not expected to have a material effect on the Bank’s results of operations.
The Bank is subject to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate, as of the date of the financial statements, that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.
Note 18—16—Transactions with Shareholders
The Bank is a cooperative whose member institutions own substantially all of the capital stock of the Bank. Former members and certain non-members, which own the Bank’s capital stock as a result of a merger or acquisition of a member of the Bank, own the remaining capital stock to support business transactions still carried on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. All holders of the Bank’s capital stock receive dividends on their investments to the extentas declared by the Bank’s board of directors. All advances are issued to members and eligible housing associates under the FHLBank Act, and mortgage loans held for portfolio were purchased from members. The Bank also maintains demand deposit accounts primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are related directly to advances and mortgage loans purchased. Transactions with any member that has an officer or director who is also a director of the Bank are subject to the same Bank policies as transactions with other members.
Related Parties. In accordance with GAAP, financial statements are required to disclose material related-party transactions other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, or other similar items that occur in the ordinary course of business. Under GAAP, related parties include owners of more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the Bank. Due to limits on member voting rights under the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations, no member owned more than 10 percent of the total voting interests. Therefore, the Bank had no such related party transactions required to be disclosed for the periods presented.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Shareholder Concentrations. The Bank considers shareholder concentration as members or non-members with regulatory capital stock outstanding in excess of 10 percent of the Bank’s total regulatory capital stock. The following tables present
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
transactions with shareholders whose holdings of regulatory capital stock exceed 10 percent of total regulatory capital stock outstanding.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2020 |
| Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Percent of Total Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Par Value of Advances | | Percent of Total Par Value of Advances | | Interest-bearing Deposits | | Percent of Total Interest-bearing Deposits |
| TIAA, FSB | 337 | | | 10.94 | | | 7,571 | | | 14.95 | | | $ | 1 | | | 0.07 | |
| Bank of America, National Association | 334 | | | 10.85 | | | 7,507 | | | 14.82 | | | 0 | | | 0.01 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2022 |
| Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Percent of Total Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Par Value of Advances | | Percent of Total Par Value of Advances | | Interest-bearing Deposits | | Percent of Total Interest-bearing Deposits |
| Truist Bank | $ | 1,277 | | | 23.67 | | | $ | 29,702 | | | 26.93 | | | $ | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2019 |
| Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Percent of Total Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Par Value of Advances | | Percent of Total Par Value of Advances | | Interest-bearing Deposits | | Percent of Total Interest-bearing Deposits |
| Truist Bank | $ | 760 | | | 15.24 | | | $ | 17,537 | | | 18.18 | | | $ | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2021 |
| Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Percent of Total Regulatory Capital Stock Outstanding | | Par Value of Advances | | Percent of Total Par Value of Advances | | Interest-bearing Deposits | | Percent of Total Interest-bearing Deposits |
| Bank of America, National Association | $ | 298 | | | 12.49 | | | $ | 7,506 | | | 16.71 | | | $ | — | | | 0.02 | |
| TIAA, FSB | 277 | | | 11.61 | | | 6,946 | | | 15.46 | | | 1 | | | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 19—17—Transactions with Other FHLBanks
The Bank’s activities with other FHLBanks are summarized below.
Loans to and Borrowings from Other FHLBanks. Occasionally, the Bank loans short-term funds to or borrows short-term funds from the other FHLBanks. There were 0no outstanding loans to or borrowings from the other FHLBanks as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. Interest income on loans to and interest expense on borrowings from the other FHLBanks were not material during each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 2018.2020.
The following table presents the cash flow activities for loans to and borrowings from other FHLBanks.
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Investing activities: | Investing activities: | | | | | | | Investing activities: | | | | | | |
| Loans to other FHLBanks | Loans to other FHLBanks | | $ | (500) | | | $ | (2,600) | | | $ | (1,000) | | Loans to other FHLBanks | | $ | (4,300) | | | $ | (780) | | | $ | (500) | |
| Principal collected on loans to other FHLBanks | Principal collected on loans to other FHLBanks | | 500 | | | 3,100 | | | 700 | | Principal collected on loans to other FHLBanks | | 4,300 | | | 780 | | | 500 | |
| Net change in loans to other FHLBanks | Net change in loans to other FHLBanks | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | (300) | | Net change in loans to other FHLBanks | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | Financing activities: | Financing activities: | | Financing activities: | |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | Proceeds from short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2,078 | | | $ | 660 | | Proceeds from short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | | $ | 4,080 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | — | |
| Payments of short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | Payments of short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | | 0 | | | (2,078) | | | (660) | | Payments of short-term borrowings from other FHLBanks | | (4,080) | | | (25) | | | — | |
| Net change in borrowings from other FHLBanks | Net change in borrowings from other FHLBanks | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | Net change in borrowings from other FHLBanks | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Mortgage Loan Purchases of Participation Interests from Other FHLBanks. In December 2016, the Bank agreed to purchase a 90 percent participating interest in a $100 master commitment of certain newly acquired mortgage loans from the FHLBank Indianapolis. The Bank’s outstanding balance related to these mortgage loans was $43$22 and $69$25 as of December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively.
Note 20—18— Subsequent Events
On January 29, 2021,26, 2023, the Bank’s board of directors approved a fourth quarter 2022 cash dividend for the fourth quarterat an annualized rate of 2020.6.37 percent. The Bank paid the fourth quarter 20202022 dividend on February 2, 2021,2023 in the amount of $30.$78.
On January 29, 2021, the Bank’s board of directors approved an adjustment to the membership stock requirement from 0.09
percent (nine basis points) to 0.05 percent (five basis points) of the member’s total assets, and an adjustment of the cap from $15 to $16.20, as well as an adjustment to the activity-based stock requirement from 4.25 percent to 3.75 percent of the member’s outstanding par value of advances. These changes become effective March 19, 2021. The Bank cannot estimate the
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
impact of these changes at this time.
Supplementary Financial Information (Unaudited)
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
The following tables present supplementary financial information for each quarter in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| Fourth Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Second Quarter | | First Quarter | | Total |
| Interest income | $ | 134 | | | $ | 188 | | | $ | 312 | | | $ | 643 | | | $ | 1,277 | |
| Interest expense | 65 | | | 99 | | | 222 | | | 558 | | | 944 | |
| Net interest income | 69 | | | 89 | | | 90 | | | 85 | | | 333 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Noninterest income | 5 | | | 9 | | | 6 | | | 93 | | | 113 | |
| Noninterest expense | 36 | | | 35 | | | 34 | | | 58 | | | 163 | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 3 | | | 7 | | | 6 | | | 12 | | | 28 | |
| Net income | $ | 35 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 108 | | | $ | 255 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Fourth Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Second Quarter | | First Quarter | | Total |
| Interest income | $ | 840 | | | $ | 913 | | | $ | 999 | | | $ | 988 | | | $ | 3,740 | |
| Interest expense | 699 | | | 795 | | | 867 | | | 844 | | | 3,205 | |
| Net interest income | 141 | | | 118 | | | 132 | | | 144 | | | 535 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Noninterest income | 3 | | | 5 | | | 4 | | | 7 | | | 19 | |
| Noninterest expense | 36 | | | 39 | | | 32 | | | 39 | | | 146 | |
| Affordable Housing Program assessment | 11 | | | 8 | | | 11 | | | 11 | | | 41 | |
| Net income | $ | 97 | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 367 | |
Investment Portfolio
The following table presents supplementary financial information on the Bank’s investments (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Due in one year or less | | Due after one year through five years | | Due after five through 10 years | | Due after 10 years | | Total |
| Interest-bearing deposits | | $ | 1,644 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,644 | | | $ | 3,810 | | | $ | 6,782 | |
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell | | 9,500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,500 | | | 8,800 | | | 3,750 | |
| Federal funds sold | | 3,270 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,270 | | | 9,826 | | | 8,978 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury obligations | | 1,500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,500 | | | 1,499 | | | — | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | | — | | | 62 | | | — | | | — | | | 62 | | | 59 | | | 55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total trading securities | | 1,500 | | | 62 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,562 | | | 1,558 | | | 55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Private-label residential MBS | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 684 | | | 865 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State and local housing agency debt obligations | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations | | 245 | | | 1,740 | | | 200 | | | 60 | | | 2,245 | | | 4,497 | | | 2,672 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. agency obligations- guaranteed residential | | — | | | 1 | | | 4 | | | 290 | | | 295 | | | 89 | | | 118 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises residential | | — | | | 32 | | | 42 | | | 7,209 | | | 7,283 | | | 8,642 | | | 9,304 | |
| Government-sponsored enterprises commercial | | 19 | | | 2,211 | | | 7,917 | | | 433 | | | 10,580 | | | 12,518 | | | 11,368 | |
| Private-label residential | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 192 | | | 416 | |
| Total held-to-maturity securities | | 264 | | | 3,984 | | | 8,164 | | | 7,992 | | | 20,404 | | | 25,939 | | | 23,879 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total investment securities | | 1,764 | | | 4,046 | | | 8,164 | | | 7,992 | | | 21,966 | | | 28,181 | | | 24,799 | |
| Total investments | | $ | 16,178 | | | $ | 4,046 | | | $ | 8,164 | | | $ | 7,992 | | | $ | 36,380 | | | $ | 50,617 | | | $ | 44,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Yield on trading securities | | 0.22 | % | | 2.64 | % | | — | | | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Yield on held-to-maturity securities | | 0.32 | % | | 0.49 | % | | 0.67 | % | | 0.96 | % | | | | | | |
| Yield on total investment securities | | 0.24 | % | | 0.52 | % | | 0.67 | % | | 0.96 | % | | | | | | |
The U.S. government and GSEs were the only issuers whose securities exceeded 10 percent of the Bank’s total capital at December 31, 2020.
Loan Portfolio
The following table presents the Bank’s outstanding domestic loans, nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest, and restructured loans (in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Advances | $ | 52,168 | | | $ | 97,167 | | | $ | 108,462 | | | $ | 102,440 | | | $ | 99,077 | |
| Real estate mortgages | $ | 219 | | | $ | 297 | | | $ | 361 | | | $ | 436 | | | $ | 524 | |
| Nonaccrual real estate mortgages, unpaid principal balance | $ | 12 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 11 | |
Real estate mortgages past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, unpaid principal balance (1) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Troubled debt restructurings, unpaid principal balance (not included above) (2) | $ | 5 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 10 | |
| Interest contractually due during the year | $ | 1 | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest actually received during the year | $ | — | | | | | | | | | |
___________
(1) Only government loans (e.g., FHA, VA) continue to accrue interest after 90 days or more delinquent.
(2) Represents troubled debt restructured loans that are still performing as of year end.
The Bank places a conventional mortgage loan on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest from the borrower is 90 days or more past due.
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
The following table presents the allowance for credit losses on domestic conventional residential mortgage loans (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 2 | |
| Reversal of provision for credit losses | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average loans outstanding during the year (in basis points) | 4 | | | — | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 2 | |
Short-term Borrowings
Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. The following table presents information regarding the Bank’s short-term borrowings (dollars in millions).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of and for the Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Consolidated obligation discount notes: | | | | | |
| Amount outstanding at the end of the year | $ | 25,385 | | | $ | 52,134 | | | $ | 66,025 | |
| Weighted average interest rate at the end of the year | 0.11 | % | | 1.64 | % | | 2.33 | % |
| Daily average outstanding for the year | $ | 52,397 | | | $ | 59,736 | | | $ | 60,847 | |
| Weighted average interest rate for the year | 0.68 | % | | 2.29 | % | | 1.87 | % |
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the year | $ | 97,698 | | | $ | 73,642 | | | $ | 70,108 | |
| | | | | |
| Consolidated obligation bonds: | | | | | |
| Amount outstanding at the end of the year | $ | 26,952 | | | $ | 64,675 | | | $ | 30,618 | |
| Weighted average interest rate at the end of the year | 0.16 | % | | 1.74 | % | | 2.33 | % |
| Daily average outstanding for the year | $ | 41,118 | | | $ | 43,592 | | | $ | 33,428 | |
| Weighted average interest rate for the year | 0.78 | % | | 2.19 | % | | 2.31 | % |
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the year | $ | 59,285 | | | $ | 70,983 | | | $ | 37,806 | |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Bank’s President and Chief Executive Officer and the Bank’s SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Certifying Officers) are responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its Certifying Officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank’s management, with the participation of the Certifying Officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Certifying Officers have concluded that the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(a)13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (1) is accumulated and communicated to the Bank’s management, including the Certifying Officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and (2) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.
In designing and evaluating the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Bank’s Certifying Officers recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Bank’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Bank, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Bank’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020.2022. In making this assessment, the Bank’s management utilized the criteria set forth by COSO inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based upon that evaluation, management has concluded that the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.2022.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The effectiveness of the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020,2022, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears within.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of 2020,2022, there were no changes in the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting that have affected materially, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors
The FHLBank Act provides that an FHLBank’s board of directors is to comprise 13 directors, or such other number as the Director of the Finance Agency determines appropriate. For 2020,2023, the Director has designated 14 directorships for the Bank, eight of which are member directorships and six of which are independent directorships. In 2022, the Bank’s board of directors was comprised of eight member directors and six independent directors.
All individuals serving as Bank directors must be United StatesU.S. citizens. At least a majority of the directors must be member directors and not less than two-fifths must be independent directors. Under the FHLBank Act, as amended by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, and Finance Agency regulations, the term of office of each director is four years, subject to certain adjustments to achieve a staggered board. Any director that has been elected to three consecutive full terms is not eligible for election to directorship for any term that begins within two years of the expiration of the third term.
The board of directors does not solicit proxies, nor are member institutions permitted to solicit or use proxies in order to cast their votes in an election. The Bank prepares and delivers a ballot to each member that was a member as of the record date.
Member Directors
Candidates for member directorships in a particular state are nominated by members in that state. FHLBank Boards are not permitted to nominate or elect member directors, except for vacant member directorships. Finance Agency regulations require that:
•a member directorship be held only by an officer or director of a member institution located within the Bank’s district;
•the member institution meet all minimum capital requirements established by its regulator(s); and
•the member institution be a member as of the record date established for the election of the member director.
The Bank is not permitted to establish additional eligibility criteria or qualifications for member directorships. With respect to member directors, under Finance Agency regulations, no director, officer, employee, attorney, or agent of the Bank (except in his/her personal capacity) may, directly or indirectly, support the nomination or election of a particular individual for a member directorship.
For each member director position to be filled, an eligible member in that state may cast one vote for each share of capital stock it was required to hold as of the record date, except that an eligible member’s votes for each member director position to be filled may not exceed the average number of shares of capital stock required to be held by all of the members in that state as of the record date.
The regulations permit, but do not require, the board of directors to conduct an annual assessment of the skills and experience possessed by the members of its board of directors as a whole and to determine whether the capabilities of the board would be enhanced through the addition of individuals with particular skills and experience. The Bank may identify those qualifications and so inform the members as part of its election notification process, but the Bank may not exclude a member director candidate from the election ballot on the basis of such qualifications. In 2020,2022, the board of directors conducted an assessment of its directors, but did not identify any particular qualifications as part of its 20202022 election notification process.
Independent Directors
Candidates for independent directorships are nominated by the Bank’s board of directors. Finance Agency regulations require that an independent directorship be held only by an individual:
•who is a bona fide resident of the Bank’s district;
•who is not a director, officer, or employee of a member institution or of any recipient of advances from the Bank; and
•who is not an officer of any FHLBank.
At least two of the independent directors must be public interest directors. Finance Agency regulations define a public interest independent director as someone having more than four years of experience representing consumer or community interests in banking services, credit needs, housing or consumer financial protection. The other independent directors must have experience in, or knowledge of, one or more of the following areas: auditing and
accounting, derivatives, financial management, organizational management, project development, risk management practices, and the law.
Any individual may submit an application form and request to be considered by the Bank to be an independent director candidate. Before nominating any individual for an independent directorship, other than for a public interest directorship, the Board must determine that the candidate’s knowledge or experience is commensurate with that needed to oversee a financial institution with a size and complexity that is comparable to the Bank’s. Finance Agency regulations require the board to consult with the Bank’s Affordable Housing Advisory Council with respect to the independent directorship candidates. Further, the Bank must submit information about independent directorship candidates to the Finance Agency for its review prior to their nomination. After the independent director candidates are nominated by the board, the candidates are then presented to the Bank’s membership for a district-wide vote. Finance Agency regulations permit the Bank’s directors, officers, attorneys, employees, agents, and Advisory Council members to support the candidacy of the board’s candidates for independent directorships.
For independent directorships, candidates are elected on a district-wide basis, withand the candidatecandidate(s) receiving the most votes beingis declared the winner. Candidates running unopposed must receive at least 20 percent of the number of votes eligible to be cast. If an unopposed candidate receives less than 20 percent of eligible votes, a new election must be conducted.
Board Vacancies
When the board has a vacancy, Finance Agency regulations require the board to elect a director to fill the vacancy by a majority vote of the remaining directors.
The Bank has determined that all directors meet the regulatory eligibility requirements for directors. Because of the laws and regulations governing member directorship elections that are described above, the Bank is not in a position to know what specific factors the Bank’s member institutions may consider in selecting member director candidates or electing member directors. For the Bank’s independent directors, the board considered the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills described in the biographical paragraphs provided below in determining to nominate that person as a director for the Bank. In addition, the board has at times considered the importance of maintaining a continuity of relevant knowledge, leadership and experience on the board and the diversity the candidate would bring to the board when making nominations.
The following table presents information regarding each of the Bank’s directors, and all persons nominated or chosen to become directors, as of the date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, each director has been engaged in the principal occupation described below for at least five years. No director has any family relationship with any other director or executive officer of the Bank.
| | Name | Name | | Age | | Director Since | | Expiration of Current Term
as Director | | Board Committees | Name | | Age | | Director Since | | Expiration of Current Term
as Director | | Board Committees |
Brian E. Argrett(1) | | 57 | | 2016 | | 12/31/2021 | | (12) | |
Travis Cosby, III(1) | | 62 | | 2014 | | 12/31/2021 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) | |
Eduardo J. Arriola(1) | | Eduardo J. Arriola(1) | | 50 | | 2022 | | 12/31/2026 | | (5)(8)(10)(11) |
Suzanne S. DeFerie(1) | Suzanne S. DeFerie(1) | | 63 | | 2015 | | 12/31/2024 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) | Suzanne S. DeFerie(1) | | 66 | | 2015 | | 12/31/2024 | | (12) |
R. Thornwell Dunlap, III(1) | R. Thornwell Dunlap, III(1) | | 63 | | 2016 | | 12/31/2023 | | (5)(6)(8)(10) | R. Thornwell Dunlap, III(1) | | 65 | | 2016 | | 12/31/2023 | | (13) |
William C. Handorf(2) | William C. Handorf(2) | | 76 | | 2007 | | 12/31/2023 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) | William C. Handorf(2) | | 78 | | 2007 | | 12/31/2023 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) |
Scott C. Harvard(1)(4) | Scott C. Harvard(1)(4) | | 66 | | 2017 | | 12/31/2024 | | (7)(8)(10)(11) | Scott C. Harvard(1)(4) | | 68 | | 2017 | | 12/31/2024 | | (6)(7)(8)(10) |
Jonathan Kislak(2) | | 72 | | 2008 | | 12/31/2022 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) | |
Kim C. Liddell(1) | Kim C. Liddell(1) | | 60 | | 2015 | | 12/31/2022 | | (6)(8)(9)(11) | Kim C. Liddell(1) | | 62 | | 2015 | | 12/31/2026 | | (6)(8)(9)(11) |
William L. Lusk, Jr.(1) | | William L. Lusk, Jr.(1) | | 54 | | 2022 | | 12/31/2025 | | (5)(7)(8)(9) |
Kathleen C. McKinney(2) | | Kathleen C. McKinney(2) | | 68 | | 2023 | | 12/31/2026 | | (5)(8)(9)(11) |
Brian P. McLaughlin(2)(3) | | Brian P. McLaughlin(2)(3) | | 49 | | 2022 | | 12/31/2025 | | (6)(8)(10)(11) |
Edwina L. Payne(2) | Edwina L. Payne(2) | | 57 | | 2021 | | 12/31/2024 | | (5)(7)(8)(10) | Edwina L. Payne(2) | | 59 | | 2021 | | 12/31/2024 | | (5)(7)(8)(10) |
Garrett S. Richter(1) | | 70 | | 2019 | | 12/31/2022 | | (6)(8)(10)(11) | |
John B. Rucker(2) | John B. Rucker(2) | | 69 | | 2017 | | 12/31/2023 | | (6)(8)(10)(11) | John B. Rucker(2) | | 71 | | 2017 | | 12/31/2023 | | (6)(8)(10)(11) |
Kim D. Saunders(2)(3) | Kim D. Saunders(2)(3) | | 60 | | 2021 | | 12/31/2024 | | (6)(8)(9)(11) | Kim D. Saunders(2)(3) | | 62 | | 2021 | | 12/31/2024 | | (5)(8)(9)(11) |
Robert L. Strickland, Jr.(2)(3)(4) | | 69 | | 2007 | | 12/31/2021 | | (6)(8)(10)(11) | |
James M. Stubbs(1) | | James M. Stubbs(1) | | 60 | | 2022 | | 12/31/2025 | | (6)(7)(8)(9) |
Richard A. Whaley(1) | Richard A. Whaley(1) | | 61 | | 2013 | | 12/31/2022 | | (13) | Richard A. Whaley(1) | | 63 | | 2013 | | 12/31/2026 | | (6)(7)(8)(10) |
____________
(1)Member Director
(2)Independent Director
(3)Public Interest Director
(4)Mr. Harvard previously served as a director from 2003-2012. Mr. Strickland previously served as a director from 2002-2004.
(5)Member of Audit Committee
(6)Member of Credit and Member Services Committee
(7)Member of Enterprise Risk and Operations Committee
(8)Member of Executive Committee
(9)Member of Finance Committee
(10)Member of Governance and Compensation Committee
(11)Member of Housing and Community Investment Committee
(12)Vice chairmanchair of Executive Committee and ex officio member of all board committees
(13)ChairmanChair of Executive Committee and ex officio member of all board committees
ChairmanChair of the board, Richard A. WhaleyR. Thornwell Dunlap, III , has served as president and chief executive officer of Countrybank since 1995 and chair of its holding company, TCB Corporation (TCB), since 2001. In his capacity as chair of TCB, Mr. Dunlap is a director of Citizens Bank of Americus in Americus, Georgia, since 2001. From 1989 to 2001, he served as market manager and commercial lender for Wachovia Bank. Mr. Whaley served as chairman of the Georgia Bankers Association from October 2010 to June 2012. Mr. Whaley also served as chairmanGreenwood Capital Associates, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm, owned by TCB. He is past chair of the South GeorgiaCarolina Banks Association and is a past chair of the Independent Banks of South Carolina. Mr. Dunlap is the past chair of Greenwood Partnership Alliance and served on the Piedmont Technical College Foundation from 2008 to 2010.Board of Directors. He has served on the Ten at the Top Board of Directors since 2009 and is a founding director. Mr. Dunlap is a member and past chair of the Greenwood Rotary Club. He currently serves as chairman of the Georgia Bankers Association Insurance Trust, Inc. and is a veteran of the U.S. Army. Mr. Whaley served as Chairman of the Council of FHLBanks in 2020. He currently serves as chairman of the Executive Committee and ex officio member of the other committees of the Bank’s board.
Vice chairman of the board, Brian E. Argrett has served as president, chief executive officer, and director of City First Bank of DC since 2011. Previously, Mr. Argrett was founder and managing partner of both Fulcrum Capital Group and Fulcrum Capital Partners, L.P. from 1992 to 2011. He served as president, chief executive officer, and director of Fulcrum Venture Capital Corporation, a federally licensed and regulated Small Business Investment Company, from 1992 to 2011. He currently serves as chairman of the boards of directors of City First Enterprises, a nonprofit bank holding company, and City First Foundation. Mr. Argrett also served as presidential appointee to the Community Development Advisory Board, former chairman of the Community Development Bankers Association, and director of the Washington DC Economic Partnership. From 2006-2009, Mr. Argrett served on the audit committee of First Federal Financial Corp. (NYSE- FED). He currently serves as vice chairmanchair of the Executive Committee and ex officio member of the other committees of the Bank’s board.
Travis Cosby, III has served as chairmanVice chair of the board, of First Community Bank of Central Alabama in Wetumpka, Alabama, since January 1, 2013, having previously served as president from 2001 to 2011 as well as chief executive officer from 2004 to 2012. He has over 30 years of banking experience and served in operations, lending, investment portfolio management, and funds management positions. He worked at Union Planters Bank from 1998 to 2001, achieving the title of city president, after rising to executive vice president during his tenure at First National Bank of Wetumpka from 1982 to 1998. From 1980 to 1982, Mr. Cosby worked at Jackson Thornton and Co., CPAs. He earned a B.S. in accounting from Auburn University, and became a certified public accountant in June 1982. Mr. Cosby is a past chairman and former Chairman’s Council member of the Alabama Bankers Association, Inc. He currently serves as chairman of the Audit Committee and vice chairman of the Enterprise Risk and Operations Committee of the Bank’s board.
Suzanne S. DeFerie has served as a member of the board of directors of First Bank, a subsidiary of First Bancorp in Southern Pines, North Carolina (NASDAQ-FBNC)(NASDAQ: FBNC) since October 1, 2017. She served as president and chief executive officer of Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. in Asheville, North Carolina, from 2008 and its holding company, ASB Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ-ASBB)(NASDAQ: ASBB), from 2011 until October 1, 2017, when the bank and holding company were acquired by First Bancorp. Ms. DeFerie also serves a member of the board of directors for First Bancorp. Prior to becoming president and chief executive officer of Asheville Savings Bank and ASB Bancorp, Inc., Ms. DeFerie was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Asheville Savings Bank for 16 years. She currently serves as chairmanvice chair of the FinanceExecutive Committee and vice chairmanex officio member of the Audit Committeeother committees of the Bank’s board.
R. Thornwell Dunlap, III
Eduardo J. (“Eddy”) Arriola has served as presidentExecutive Vice President and Market Executive of SeacoastBank since October 2022 when it acquired Apollo Bank. He was the founder, the chair of the board, and chief executive officer of Countybank since 1995Apollo Bank, a community bank in Miami focused on serving entrepreneurs, small businesses, family owned businesses, and chairman of its holding company, TCB Corporation (TCB), since 2001. In his capacityprofessionals. Mr. Arriola acted as chairman of TCB, Mr. Dunlap is a director of Greenwood Capital Associates, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm, owned by the TCB. He is the past chairmanchair of the South Carolina Bankers Associationboard and chief executive officer, until its acquisition by Seacoast Bank. He served two terms a board member of the Miami Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2017 to 2022 and is a past chairmanboard member of the Independent BanksFlorida Bankers Association and BankServ. Mr. Arriola served as an investor and member of South Carolina. Mr. Dunlapthe board of directors of Total Bank from 2002 to 2007, and prior to founding Apollo Bank in 2010, he was involved in several entrepreneurial businesses in the technology and business service industries. He is the past chairmanco-founder of Inktel, a 3,000 employee call center firm based in Miami, served as director of creative services for Avanti Case-Hoyt, a national graphic arts and printing firm, and served as a board member for gMed, a leading firm in the medical office automation space. Mr. Arriola has been a leader in matters involving international policy and commerce. He serves as the chair of the Greenwood Partnership Allianceboard of the Inter-American Foundation (IAF), an independent U.S. government agency created to support grassroots development in Latin America and the Caribbean. He was appointed to the IAF board by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 2012 and has continued in the role since then. Mr. Arriola has supported many local community programs and served on the Piedmont Technicalboard of several organizations. He received his bachelor of arts in history from Boston College Foundation Board of Directors. He has served on the Ten at the Top Board of Directors since 2009 and is a founding director. Mr. Dunlap is a member and past chairmangraduate of the Greenwood Rotary Club.Owner/President Management Program of Harvard Business School. He is also a nearly 20-year member of the Young President’s Organization. Mr. Arriola currently serves as chairmanvice chair of the Governance and Compensation Committee and vice chairman of the Credit and Member Services Committee of the Bank’s board.Committee.
William C. Handorf, Ph.D. has served as a professor of finance, banking and real estate at The George Washington University’s School of Business in Washington, D.C. since 1975. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Handorf served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Baltimore branch, including two years as chair. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Handorf served as a private citizen director of the FHLBanks Office of Finance. He is a disabled veteran having been wounded while serving as a First Lieutenant with the U.S. Army in Vietnam. Mr. Handorf currently serves as vice chairman of the Finance Committee of the Bank’s board. His experience in derivatives/hedging, affordable housing, large commercial banks, and information technology supported his nomination as an independent director. Mr. Handorf currently serves as chair of the Audit Committee of the Bank’s board.
Scott C. Harvard has served as president, chief executive officer and director of First National Corporation (OTC -(NASDAQ: FXNC) since 2011. He served as president, chief executive officer and director of First Bank from 2011 to 2015 and has served as chief executive officer and director of First Bank since 2015. He previously served as a director of the Bank from 2003 to 2012, serving as chairmanchair from 2007-2012. He also served on the Council of Federal Home Loan Banks. He is a director of Community Bankers Bank Financial Corp. and its subsidiary, Community Bankers Bank in Richmond, Virginia. Mr. Harvard served as president, chief executive officer and as a director of Shore Bank from 1985 to 2008 and as president, chief executive officer and director of its parent, Shore Financial Corporation, from 1997 to 2008. He served as executive vice president and director of Hampton Roads Bankshares from 2008 to 2009 and as a Vice Presidentvice president of Virginia Savings Bank from 2009 to 2011. He previously served on the board of the Virginia Association of Community Banks from 2012 to 2014 and as a member of the executive committee of the Virginia Bankers Association, previously serving as its chairman. He is a director of Community Bankers Bank Financial Corp and its subsidiary, Community Bankers Bankchair in Richmond, Virginia. He also served on the Council of Federal Home Loan Banks. Mr. Harvard has a served on numerous non-profit boards over his career2018-19, and currently serves onas a member of the boardsboard. He also serves as board chair of the Virginia Bankers Association Education Foundation. Mr. Harvard has served on numerous nonprofit boards over his career, including most recently the VBA EducationUnited Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley, Shenandoah Valley Westminster Canterbury and the Shenandoah Valley Westminster Canterbury Foundation, the Top of Virginia Chamber of Commerce, and the Shenandoah Valley Westminster Canterbury.Shrine Mont. Mr. Harvard currently serves as vice chairman of the Governance and Compensation Committee of the Bank’s board.
Jonathan Kislak has served as principal and chairman of the board of Antares Capital Corporation, a venture capital firm investing equity capital in expansion stage companies and management buyout opportunities, since 1999. From 1993 to 2005, Mr. Kislak served as president and chairman of the board of Kislak Financial Corporation, a community bank holding company in Miami, Florida. From 2013-2016, Mr. Kislak served on the board of directors and chair of the audit committee of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp. (NYSE - CHMI). He currently serves as chairman of
the Enterprise Risk and Operations Committee of the Bank’s board. Mr. Kislak’s experience in banking, audit, capital markets, mortgage markets and affordable housing supported his nomination as an independent director.
Kim C. Liddell has served as a director of BayVanguard Bank since October 31, 2020. He previously served as president and chief executive officer of 1880 Bank, formerly known as the National Bank of Cambridge, in Cambridge, Maryland, from 2010, and as chairmanchair of the board since April 2011, until its acquisition B ayVanguardBayVanguard Bank in October, 2020. From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Liddell served as chief operating officer and executive vice president of Cardinal Financial Corporation (CFNL) and Cardinal Bank. Mr. Liddell was a director of Delmarva Bancshares, Inc. from 2010 to 2020, until its sale to BVFL. Mr. Liddell has been a director of BVFL since 2020. Mr. Liddell also served as a board member of the Maryland Bankers Association from 2012 to 2020, Virginia Bankers Association’s Member Services, Inc., from 2006 to 2009, Junior Achievement of the National Capital Area, Business in Education Partnership with the Falls Church City Public Schools, Arlington County Chamber of Commerce, Celebrate Fairfax, Dorchester County Chamber of Commerce, and Leadership Fairfax. Mr. Liddell currently serves onFairfax and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council andCouncil. Mr. Liddell currently serves on the board of Dorchester General Hospital Foundation. Mr. Liddell currently serves as chairmanchair of the Finance Committee of the Bank’s board.
William L. (“Chip”) Lusk, Jr. has served as chief executive officer of the IDB Global Federal Credit Union since 2016. Prior to leading IDB Global, Mr. Lusk was chief operating officer and Memberchief financial officer for Georgia’s Own Credit Union from 2011 to 2015. From 1999 to 2011, he served as chief financial officer, executive vice president, and secretary of the board of First Security Group, Inc. (NASDQ: FSGI) and FSGBank, NA. From 1991 to 1999, he served in various roles, including vice president, controller, and director of strategic planning, for Pioneer Bancshares, Inc., an
SEC registrant, and Pioneer Bank. He is currently a member of the District of Columbia Financial Literacy Council and a member of the Finastra Phoenix Client Advisory Board. Previously, Mr. Lusk served on the DC Credit Union Foundation Board, Habitat for Humanity Board, the YoungLife Committee, the Episcopal Migration Ministries and the Rotary Club. Mr. Lusk currently serves as vice chair of the Audit Committee of the Bank’s board.
Kathleen C. McKinney is Senior Counsel, Public Finance, of Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. She has been an attorney with Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd since 1995 and was previously associated with the McNair Law firm from 1981 until 1995. She served as an independent director of the FHLBanks Office of Finance Board of Directors from 2010 until 2022. Ms. McKinney assists healthcare and educational institutions in mergers, acquisitions, expansions and affiliations, with a focus on addressing legal strategies for taxable and tax-exempt debt and other financing options. She has also been bond, issuers’, disclosure and underwriters’ counsel in revenue bond issues, resulting in $4 billion of capital investment in South Carolina in the past three years. She serves as bond counsel for many of South Carolina’s leading hospitals. Ms. McKinney also serves as bond counsel for colleges and universities, charter schools, foundations and continuing care retirement and life care projects. She has assisted in establishing best practices in corporate governance for public and nonprofit institutions. She is immediate past chair of Spartanburg Methodist College Board of Trustees and immediate past chair of the Woodlands at Furman and serves on the Endowment Committee of the Metropolitan Arts Council in Greenville. Ms. McKinney’s extensive legal and regulatory experience on financing transactions as well as her experience on board of directors of the Office of Finance for 12 years supported her nomination as an independent director. Ms. McKinney currently serves as vice chair of the Finance Committee of the Bank’s board of directors.
Brian P. McLaughlin has served as president of Enterprise Community Development, Inc. since 2019. Enterprise Community Development is headquartered in Baltimore, MD and is among the 10 largest nonprofit providers of affordable housing in the United States. In 2014 Mr. McLaughlin co-founded Lantian Development, Inc, a Maryland real estate investment and development firm, where he served as founding CEO and later as chief investment officer until his departure in 2019. Across his 25-year career, Mr. McLaughlin served in various technical and leadership roles in mission driven organizations seeking to expand housing and economic opportunity, including eight years in various roles at Fannie Mae (from 2000-2003 and again later from 2006-2011). From 2003-2006, Mr. McLaughlin was Assistant Secretary of the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development, where he led its division responsible for neighborhood revitalization programs and investment. He has served on the boards of Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore, the Fund for Educational Excellence, the Community Preservation and Development Corporation, and currently serves on the board of Northern Virginia Affordable Housing Alliance since 2022 and the Baltimore Branch Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond since 2022.Mr. McLaughlin’s expertise in the area of affordable housing, his breadth of experience and deep understanding of the inequities in the housing market, his regulatory and credit experience, as well as his experience with government sponsored enterprises, supported his nomination as an independent and public interest director. Mr. McLaughlin currently serves as vice chair of the Housing and Community Investment Committee of the Bank’s board.
Edwina L. Payneis a retired Chief Information Officer. She most recently served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Varsity Brands retiring in 2021. She served as Senior Vice President, Technology Strategy & Enterprise Portfolio, McKesson Corporation, from 2019-2020,2019 to 2020, in which she was responsible for the McKesson technology strategy, enterprise portfolio management, enterprise architecture, asset management and organization effectiveness functions for McKesson IT globally. Ms. Payne has served in numerous executive information technology leadership positions, including service as Chief Information Officer of Avanos Medical from 2017-20192017 to 2019 and Chief Information Officer for Zimmer Biomet and Zimmer Inc. from 2010-2016.2010 to 2016. Her experience includes broad global supply chain and life sciences environments, including global IT and supply chain leadership positions at Johnson and Johnson from 2003 to 2010 and Kellogg Company from 1986-1998,1986 to 1998, where her roles included assignments in Brazil and Mexico. Ms. Payne currently serves on the Industrial Advisory Board for Purdue University, School of Computer Technology and the Dean’s Council for Purdue University, College of Technology. In addition, she currently serves on the Marian University Technology Advisory Board, the Tech Alpharetta Board, and the Inspiredu Board in Atlanta. Ms. Payne was a Georgia CIO of the Year Finalist in 2018. Ms. Payne’s experience in audit, risk management, and information technology supported her nomination as an independent director.
Garrett S. Richter Ms. Payne currently serves as president and chief executive officer of First Florida Integrity Bank (FFIB), the successor to First National Bankvice chair of the Gulf Coast, which was founded in 2009. He also serves as a directorEnterprise Risk and president of TGR Financial, Inc., FFIB’s holding company. Prior to that, he served for one term in the Florida House of Representatives and two terms as a Florida State Senator, chairing the Senate Banking and InsuranceOperations Committee for four years. He was the President Pro Tempore of the Florida Senate from 2012-2016. From 1994 to 2005 he was President and CEO of First National Bank of Naples, a bank which he co-founded in 1989. Mr. Richter has also served as a commissioner on the Florida Ethics Commission. He is on the board of directors for the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, chairing the Public Policy Committee. He is a veteran of the U.S. Army, having served with the 75th Ranger Company in Vietnam in 1971.Bank’s board.
John B. Rucker has served as managing director of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (Stifel), an investment banking firm, since 2015, and manages Stifel’s affordable housing business. Mr. Rucker was a founding partner and managing director of Merchant Capital, L.L.C., a public finance investment banking firm, from 1987 to 2015, which was acquired by Stifel in 2015. He is also a registered municipal advisor. He was a member of Fannie Mae’s Southeast Regional Housing Advisory Council and Fannie Mae’s National Housing Impact Advisory Council in 2004 and 2005. He has also served on the board of directors of the National Housing & Rehabilitation Association since 2003. Mr. Rucker served on the Bank’s Affordable Housing Advisory Council from 2012 to 2016, serving as its vice chairmanchair from 2014 to 2015 and as its chairmanchair in 2016. He currentlyMr. Rucker also serves as chairmanon the board of the Housing and Community Investment Committee of the Bank’s board.CAHEC since 2022, an affordable housing tax-credit syndicator. Mr. Rucker’s experience in derivatives/hedging, affordable housing, large commercial banks, and information technology supported his nomination as an
independent director. Mr. Rucker currently serves as the chair of the Governance and Compensation Committee of the Bank’s board.
Kim D. Saunders hasis the Co-Founder and Co-Managing Director of Legacy Two Advisors (LTA). LTA, founded in 2016, is an investment management firm whose mission is to build generational wealth in communities of color. Previously, she served as President and CEO of the National Bankers Association (NBA) since 2018, having served2018-2021, including service as a director since 2013.2013-2021. The NBA is the premier trade association for the nation’s minority banks. Ms. Saunders also serves as the Co-Managing Director of the MDI Keeper’s Fund, L.P., which primarily provides Tier I capital to minority depository institutions. Previously, Ms. Saunders served in executive leadership roles in minority depository institutions and community development financial institutions, which are mission driven organizations that expand economic opportunity for underserved people and communities. These institutions are focused on serving community and consumer interests in banking services, credit needs, and housing, in areas that are usually economically distressed. From 2007-2014, Ms. Saunders served as Director, President and CEO of M&F Bancorp, Inc. &and Mechanics & Farmers Bank. Prior to that, she served as President and CEO, Consolidated Bank & Trust Company from 2003-2007, and Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, City First Bank of D.C. from 1998-2003. Ms. Saunders currently serves on Citibank’s NMTC Corporation-Community Development
Entity Advisory Board since 2019 and on the National Foundation for Credit Counseling Envisioning Home Ownership Housing Advisory Committee.Committee since 2019. From 2004-2006, she served on the Virginia Fair Housing Board and from 2009-2015 she served on the board of the United Way of the Greater Triangle. Ms. Saunder’sSaunders’ experience with MDIs and CDFIs, which are organizations that are typically focused on community and consumer interests in banking services, credit needs, and housing, in areas that are typically economically distressed, supported her nomination as aan independent and public interest director.
Robert L. Strickland, Jr. is executive director of the Alabama Housing Finance Authority, an independent public corporation dedicated to serving the housing needs of low- and moderate-income Alabamians, a position he has held since 1987. Mr. Strickland served as president of the National Council of State Housing Agencies for two terms. He has also served on the National Association of Home Builders Mortgage Finance Roundtable and as a member of Fannie Mae’s National Advisory Council. He Ms. Saunders currently serves as a director of the Alabama MultiFamily Loan Consortium. Mr. Strickland currently serves as vice chairmanchair of the Housing and Community Investment Committee of the Bank’s board. Mr. Strickland’s experience in affordable housing finance supported his nomination as a public interest director.
James M. (“Jimmy”) Stubbs has served as chief executive officer and director of River Bank & Trust since its formation in 2006, and as a director of its holding company, River Financial Corporation (OTC: RVRF), since 2006. Mr. Stubbs is the past chair of the Alabama Bankers Association from June 2020 to June 2021. He currently serves as a board member for the Business Council of Alabama, the Montgomery Area Committee of 100, the Montgomery Area Committee of the Arts, the Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce, and the YMCA of Montgomery Endowment Foundation. Mr. Stubbs is a Leadership Alabama Class of 2007 alumnus and a member of the River Region United Way’s Tocqueville Society and the Wetumpka Lions Club. He is a lifetime member of the Auburn Alumni Association and the Alabama Cattlemen’s Association. He graduated from Auburn University with a BS degree in 1985 and obtained an executive MBA degree from Troy University in 2005. He currently serves as vice chair of the Credit and Member Services Committee of the Bank’s board.
Richard A. Whaley has served as president, chief executive officer, and director of Citizens Bank of Americus in Americus, Georgia, since 2001. From 1989 to 2001, he served as market manager and commercial lender for Wachovia Bank. Mr. Whaley served as chair of the Georgia Bankers Association from October 2010 to June 2012. Mr. Whaley also served as chair of the South Georgia Technical College Foundation from 2008 to 2010. He currently serves as chair of the Georgia Bankers Association Insurance Trust, Inc. and is a veteran of the U.S. Army. Mr. Whaley served as Chair of the Council of FHLBanks in 2020. He currently serves as chair of the Credit and Member Services Committee of the Bank’s board.
Code of Conduct
The board has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to the Bank’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, in each case, who are employees of the Bank. The Code of Conduct is posted on the Who We Are - Investor Relations -Governance- Governance section of the Bank’s Internet website at http://corp.fhlbatl.com/who-we-are/investor-relations/. Any amendments to, or waivers under, the Bank’s Code of Conduct that are required to be disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s rules will be disclosed on the Bank’s website.
Director Independence, Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, and Audit Committee Financial Expert
General
The board of directors of the Bank is required to evaluate the independence of the directors ofas described under the BankIndependent Directors heading above, and under two distinct director independence standards. First, Finance Agency regulations establish independence criteria for directors who serve as members of the Bank’s Audit Committee. Second, SEC rules require that the Bank’s board of directors apply the independence criteria of a national securities exchange or automated quotation system in assessing the independence of its directors.
As of the date of this Report, the Bank has 14 directors, eight of whom are member directors and six of whom are independent directors.directors under Finance Agency Regulations. None of the Bank’s directors is an “inside” director. That is,
none of the Bank’s directors is a Bank employee or officer. Further, as the Bank’s capital stock may only be owned by members, former members, and certain non-members, the Bank’s directors cannot personally own stock or stock options in the Bank. However, each of the member directors is an officer or director of an institution that is a member of the Bank and that is encouraged to, and does, engage in transactions with the Bank on a regular basis.
Finance Agency Regulations Regarding Independence for Audit Committee composition
The Finance Agency’s director independence standards prohibit an individual from serving as a member of the Bank’s Audit Committee if he or she has one or more disqualifying relationships with the Bank or its management that would interfere with the exercise of that individual’s independent judgment. Disqualifying relationships considered by the board are: employment with the Bank at any time during the last five years; acceptance of compensation from the Bank other than for service as a director; being a consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter, or legal counsel for the Bank at any time within the last five years; and being an immediate family member of an individual who is or who has been within the past five years, a Bank executive officer. The board assesses the independence of each director under the Finance Agency’s independence standards, regardless of whether he or she serves on the Audit Committee. As of March 4, 2021,10, 2023, each of the Bank’s directors was independent under these criteria.
SEC Rules Regarding Independence
SEC rules require the Bank’s board of directors to adopt a standard of independence to evaluate its directors. The board has adopted the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to determine which of its directors are independent, including members of its Governance and Compensation Committee and Audit Committee, and whether the Bank’s Audit Committee’s financial experts are independent.
After applying the NYSE independence standards, the board determined that, as of March 4, 2021,10, 2023, directors Handorf, Kislak,McKinney, McLaughlin, Payne, and Rucker and Strickland,are each an independent director, were independent.director. Based upon the fact that each member director is a senior official of an institution that is a member of the Bank (and thus is an equity holder in the Bank), that each such institution may routinely engage in transactions with the Bank, and that such transactions occur frequently and are encouraged, the board determined that none of the member directors presently meets the independence criteria under the NYSE independence standards. Similarly, because Ms. Saunders is a general partner in a fund that may provide capital investments in Bank MDI members, who are able to transact business with the Bank, the board has determined that she would not meet the independence criteria under the NYSE independence standards after any such investment.
It is possible that under the NYSE objective criteria for independence (particularly the criterion regarding the amount of business conducted with the Bank by the director’s institution), a member director could meet the independence standard on a particular day. However, because the amount of business conducted by a member director’s institution may change frequently, and because the Bank generally desires to increase the amount of business it conducts with each member, the directors deemed it inappropriate to draw distinctions among the member directors based upon the amount of business conducted with the Bank by any director’s institution at a specific time. Similar reasoning applies to Ms. Saunders.
Compensation Committee
The board has a Governance and Compensation Committee, composed of directors Argrett, Dunlap, DeFerie, Rucker, Arriola, Harvard, McLaughlin, Payne Richter, Rucker, Strickland, and Whaley. As the Bank’s Governance and Compensation Committee may only recommend actions to the full board regarding governance practices and compensation and benefits programs, which the full board may approve or disapprove, the board assesses the independence of the full board under the NYSE’s standards for compensation committees. The board determined that, as of March 4, 2021,10, 2023, each of directors Handorf, Kislak,McKinney, McLaughlin, Payne, Rucker, and StricklandRucker was independent under the NYSE independence standards for compensation committee members, but for the reasons noted above, none of the member directors or Ms. Saunders was independent under such standards.
Audit Committee
The board has a standing Audit Committee, composed of directors Argrett, Cosby,Dunlap, DeFerie, Dunlap, Handorf, Kislak,Lusk, Arriola, McKinney, Payne and Whaley.Saunders. The board determined that, as of March 4, 2021,10, 2023, each of directors Handorf, KislakMcKinney and Payne was independent under the NYSE independence standards for audit committee members, but, for the reasons noted above, none of the member directors serving on the Audit Committee or Ms. Saunders was independent under such standards. The board also determined that each of directors Argrett, Cosby,DeFerie, Dunlap, DeFerie, Handorf, KislakLusk, Arriola, McKinney and WhaleySaunders is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the SEC rules.
The board also assesses the independence of the Audit Committee members under Section 10A (m)(3) of the Exchange Act. As of March 4, 2021,10, 2023, each of the Bank’s directors was independent under these criteria. As stated above, the board determined that each member of the Audit Committee was independent under the Finance Agency’s standards applicable to the Bank’s Audit Committee.
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
The directors are nominated and elected in accordance with applicable law and Finance Agency regulations. As required by applicable law, the chairmanchair and vice chairmanchair of the board are elected by a majority of all the directors of the Bank from among the directors of the Bank for two year terms, and since Bank officers may not serve as directors of the Bank, neither the board chairmanchair or vice chairmanchair position can be filled by the president and chief executive officer of the Bank.
The board of directors establishes the Bank’s risk management culture, including risk tolerances and risk management philosophies, by establishing its risk management system, overseeing its risk management activities, and adopting its risk appetite and RMP. The board reviews the risk appetite report on a quarterly basis and approves any changes as appropriate. The board receives regular updates on the Bank’s key risks including an independent risk assessment. The board reviews the RMP at least annually and approves any amendments to it as appropriate. For further discussion of the risk appetite and the RMP, please seeItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Risk Management.Management. The board works with management to align the Bank’s strategic activities and objectives within the parameters of the risk appetite framework and the RMP. The board utilizes committees as an integral part of overseeing risk management, including an audit committee, a credit and member services committee, an enterprise risk and operations committee, an executive committee, a finance committee, a governance and compensation committee, and a housing and community investment committee, with the following oversight responsibilities:
•Audit Committee oversees the Bank’s financial reporting process, system of internal control, audit process, policies and procedures for assessing and monitoring implementation of the strategic plan, and the Bank’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.
•Credit and Member Services Committee oversees the Bank’s credit and collateral policies and related programs, services, products and documentation, and the Bank’s credit and collateral risk management program, strategies, and activities.
•Enterprise Risk and Operations Committee oversees the Bank’s enterprise risk management functions, operations, information technology, cybersecurity and other related matters.
•Executive Committee exercises most of the powers of the board in the management and direction of the affairs of the Bank during the intervals between board meetings.
•Finance Committee oversees matters affecting the Bank’s financial performance, capital management and other related matters, including the Bank’s market and liquidity risk management program, strategies, and activities.
•Governance and Compensation Committee oversees the Bank’s governance practices, compensation and benefits programs, and other related matters.
•Housing and Community Investment Committee oversees the Bank’s housing and community investment policies, programs, and other relevant matters, including any other Bank products, services, and programs that may provide grants, subsidies, or other forms of assistance to support affordable housing and community economic development for low- and moderate-income individuals and communities.
The Bank’s internal management is overseen by the president and chief executive officer and delegated to other senior managers and internal management committees. The Bank has determined that this leadership structure is the most effective means of actively engaging the board of directors in risk management oversight while utilizing Bank management to implement and maintain sound risk management practices.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The board has a Governance and Compensation Committee that recommends actions to the full board regarding governance practices and compensation and benefits programs, which the full board of directors may approve or disapprove. None of the directors serving on the board in 20202022 has at any time been an officer or employee with the Bank. None of the Bank’s executive officers served during 20202022 or is serving on the board of directors or the compensation committee of any entity whose executive officers served on the Bank’s board of directors.
Executive Officers
The following table presents the names, ages, and titles of the executive officers of the Bank and all persons chosen to become executive officers as of the date of this Report. No executive officer has any family relationship with any other executive officer or director of the Bank.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Officer | | Age | | Title |
W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg | | 5762 | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 57 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Alp E. Can | | 4547 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer |
Reginald T. O’ShieldsK. Annette Hunter | | 5058 | | Executive Vice President and General Counsel,Director of Business Operations |
| Reginald T. O’Shields | | 52 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Compliance Officer |
| Jefrino Afonso | | 59 | | Senior Vice President and EthicsChief Information Officer |
| Joel C. Badger | | 5456 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Audit Officer |
| Scott M. Brennan | | 4446 | | Senior Vice President and Director of Sales |
Julia S. Brown | | 55 | | Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary |
| Sharon B. Cook | | 4244 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer |
Bryan Delong | | 57 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Arthur L. Fleming | | 6264 | | Senior Vice President and Director of Community Investment Services |
Melissa V. HoggattDawn Gehring | | 6050 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer |
Annette Hunter | | 56 | | Senior Vice President and Director of Business Operations |
Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 55 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Robert S. Kovach | | 57 | | Senior Vice President and Chief CreditHuman Resources Officer |
| Leslie H. Schreiner | | 5759 | | FirstSenior Vice President and Director ofChief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer |
| William T. Shaw | | 4951 | | Senior Vice President and Controller |
W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg was appointed presidenthas served as president and chief executive officer in December 2010. Previously,since May 28, 2021. He previously served as executive vice president and chief operating officer from November 2019 through November 2020, overseeing the Bank’s member sales and outreach, community investment services, accounting, financial reporting, financial operations management, investment and derivatives operations, treasury and information technology. He served as executive vice president and chief financial officer from April 2011 through October 2019. From 2007 through March 2011, he served as executive vice president and director of financial management since 2004, with responsibilitychief credit officer, overseeing collateral services, credit services, community investment services and mortgage program operations. Prior to that, Mr. Malmberg served as senior vice president responsible for sales, MPP sales,the Bank’s mortgage programs. He joined the Bank in 2001 as senior vice president, asset-liability management, liquidity management, other mission-related investments, customer systemsafter having served for five years as senior vice president, treasury, at FHLBank Chicago. Mr. Malmberg earned an M.B.A. from Rice University and operations,a B.A. from Trinity University.
Haig H. Kazazian, III has served as chief financial officer since 2019 and member education.promoted to executive vice president effective January 1, 2022, having previously served as senior vice president and treasurer since 2013. Mr. McMullanKazazian joined the Bank as a credit analyst in 19881992 and later earned promotions to assistant vice presidentmanager of national accounts and product Development in 1993, vice president2001, First Vice President in 1995, group vice president2005, manager of national accounts and capital markets trading in 1998,2009, and manager of treasury analysis and national accounts sales and trading in 2011, and senior vice president in 2001.2014. Mr. Kazazian oversees the Bank’s business operations, accounting services, member sales, trading and education, and treasury function. He currently serves as vice chairman of the board of directors of the FHLBanks’ Office of Finance. Mr. McMullan is a chartered financial analyst and earned an M.B.A. and a B.S.B.A. in financeeconomics, each from ClemsonEmory University. Mr. Kazazian was an M.B.A. Fellowship Recipient.
Alp E. Can has served as chief risk officer since 2017, directing the Bank's enterprise risk management function. Effective November 1,Since 2019, Mr. Can also oversees the Bank’s credit and collateral services and collateral risk management operations. Mr. Can was appointedhas served as executive vice president effective January 1, 2020, having served as senior vice president since 2018. He is responsible for overseeing enterprise-wide risk assessment and reporting functions, credit risk, financial risk modeling, as well as model validation efforts for the Bank. Mr. Can joined the Bank in 2005 as an asset liability analyst in the financial risk management and modeling department. He was promoted to first vice president and manager of financial risk modeling in 2013 and to director of enterprise risk management in 2014. Mr. Can earned a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Istanbul, and an M.S. in mathematical risk management and M.B.A.- Finance, each from Georgia State University.
K. Annette Hunter was promoted to executive vice president, effective on January 1, 2023. Prior to her promotion, she had served as senior vice president, director of business operations since November 1, 2019, and also served as senior vice president, director of accounting operations since 2006. Ms. Hunter was promoted in that role from first vice president to senior vice president in 2015. In that role, Ms. Hunter is responsible for the daily accounting operations of the derivatives, investments, consolidated obligations, advances, stock and purchased mortgage portfolios, as well as managing the operations of wires, safekeeping and shareholder support. Ms. Hunter joined the Bank in 2002 as manager of derivative and investment operations. Prior to joining the Bank, she served in various managerial accounting roles at Mirant Corporation, Louis Dreyfus Energy Corporation and Continental Hydraulic Hose. Ms. Hunter earned a B.S. in business administration from The Ohio State University and an M.B.A. from Kennesaw State University. She is a certified public accountant.
Reginald T. O’Shields was appointedhas served as chief legal and compliance officer since February 14, 2022, director of Enterprise Solutions effective November 1,enterprise solutions in 2019 and executive vice president effective January 1, 2020, having previously served as senior vice president and general counsel since 2011 and Chief Compliancechief compliance and Ethics Officerethics officer since 2018. Mr. O’Shields manages the delivery of legal services by the Bank’s legal department covering a wide variety of corporate, securities, finance, compliance and regulatory matters. In addition, he is responsible for overseeing all Bank programs related to strategic planning, human resources and administrative services, corporate communications, marketing, government and industry relations, and community investment services .services. Mr. O’Shields joined the Bank in 2003 as a senior attorney and earned promotions to assistant general counsel in 2005, associate general counsel in 2006 and deputy general counsel in 2007. He was named senior vice president, deputy general counsel and director of legal services in January 1, 2011. Before joining the Bank, Mr. O’Shields was in private legal practice with Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, LLP in Atlanta, Georgia, Haynsworth
Sinkler Boyd in Greenville, South Carolina, and Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett in New York, New York. Mr. O’Shields earned a J.D. from Vanderbilt University and a B.A. in economics from Furman University.
Jefrino Afonso joined the Bank as senior vice president, chief information officer on April 25, 2022. In this role, he oversees all aspects of the Bank’s information technology, including information security, infrastructure, operations, support center, telephony, software development, and enterprise architecture. Prior to joining the Bank, Afonso spent 16 years with Elavon, a division of US Bank, where he was responsible for various technology systems servicing internal and external customers. Previously, in 2005 Afonso worked as an independent mergers and acquisitions consultant for CompuCredit, a financial services provider, and was chief information officer/executive director for Associated Hygienic Products, a paper product manufacturing company, from 2001 to 2004. Afonso earned a B.S. in mathematics from St. Xavier’s College in Mumbai, India, and a B.S. in computer science from Loyola University in New Orleans.
Joel C. Badger was appointedhas served as chief audit officer effectivesince November 29 , 2019, andhaving been promoted from first vice president to senior vice president effective January 1, 2020. He gained audit responsibility for information technology in 2014 and has served as deputy chief audit officer since 2016. In thathis current role, he is responsible for providing an independent audit of the Bank by evaluating the internal control system and testing for compliance with internal policies and procedures as well as with applicable laws and directives from the Finance Agency. Mr. Badger reports directly to the audit committee of the board of directors. Mr. Badger joined the Bank in 2004 as Vice Presidentvice president and Senior Financial Risk Auditor,senior financial risk auditor, was promoted to Audit Directoraudit director of Capital Marketscapital markets in 2006 and First Vice Presidentfirst vice president in 2007. He gained audit responsibility for Information Technology in 2014 and has served as Deputy Chief Audit Officer since March of 2016.Mr. Badger earned a Master of Business Administration degreeM.B.A in Financefinance from Georgia State University and a Bachelor of ScienceB.S. degree in Managementmanagement with concentrations in Accountingaccounting and Economicseconomics from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Mr. Badger is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Investmentscertified public accountant, certified investments and Derivatives Auditor, Certified Internal Auditor, Certified Information Systems Auditor, Certifiedderivatives auditor, certified internal auditor, certified information systems auditor, certified in Riskrisk and Information Systems Control,information systems control, and a Certified Risk Management Auditor.certified risk management auditor. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Badger was with Branch Banking and Trust, Wachovia Bank, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Scott M. Brennan has served as director of sales since 2014, beinghaving been promoted from first vice president to senior vice president effective January 1, 2019. He joined the Bank in 2001 in the Bank’s member sales and trading department as a relationship manager, serving as senior relationship manager from 2006 to 2013, having been promoted from vice president to first vice president in 2014. Mr. Brennan earned a B.S. from Franklin and Marshall College.
Julia S. Brown serves as senior vice president and corporate secretary. The board of directors appointed Ms. Brown to serve as corporate secretary in 2011. Prior to her appointment as corporate secretary, she served as associate general counsel, assistant corporate secretary beginning in 2005, deputy general counsel, assistant corporate secretary beginning in 2007, and first vice president, deputy general counsel for governance beginning in 2009. Before joining the Bank in 2001 as a senior attorney, Ms. Brown practiced commercial real estate law with Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, LLP, in Atlanta, Georgia. She earned a B.S. in Spanish and anthropology from Wellesley College, summa cum laude, and her J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School.
Sharon B. Cook has served as chief marketing officer since 2015, having been promoted from first vice president to senior vice president effective January 1, 2020. Ms. Cook oversees the Bank’s corporate communications, marketing, and government and industry relations.relations and corporate strategic planning. Ms. Cook joined the bank in 2008 as a senior marketing communications manager. She was promoted to vice president, director of corporate communications in 2011. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Cook held leadership positions in retail banking for two Atlanta area credit unions, most recently as the vice president of marketing services for CDC Credit Union from 2002 to 2008. Ms. Cook earned an M.B.A. from Brenau University and a B.A. in Journalismjournalism and Mass Communicationsmass communications from Georgia State University.
Bryan Delong has served as senior vice president, chief human resources officer, since 2016, having previously served as director of human resources since 2008. Mr. Delong is responsible for executing the Bank’s human resources strategies to include: talent acquisition, total rewards, employee development, workforce diversity and inclusion, and human resources compliance. Mr. Delong also leads the Bank’s staff services and property management functions, which include facilities operations, tenant leasing, security, print and mail services, and procurement. A 27-year veteran of the Bank, Mr. Delong previously served as the assistant director of human resources with responsibility for managing the Bank’s compensation, benefits, human resources information systems, and employee development programs. Prior to joining the Bank in 1993, Mr. Delong worked at LOMA as a compensation consultant and AT&T as a training specialist. Mr. Delong holds an M.S. in industrial and organizational psychology from Radford University, an M.A. in human resources development from Georgia State University, and a B.A. in English from Earlham College. He holds a certification as a Professional in Human Resources.
Arthur L. Fleming has served as senior vice president, director of community investment services, since 2007, directing the Bank’s community investment, economic development, and affordable housing products and services, since 2007.services. Mr. Fleming has experience in a variety of financial services, legal, housing development, and academic roles. Before joining the Bank, Mr. Fleming was chief lending and investment officer for the Opportunity Finance Network, Inc., a national community development financial institution. He also served as the senior director for the southeast region and director of housing finance
for the Fannie Mae Foundation; the senior vice president, managing director of housing initiativesHousing Initiatives at GMAC; founder and executive director of the Community Financing Consortium, Inc; and an attorney/senior associate for the FAU/FIU Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems. Mr. Fleming earned
his undergraduate degree from Florida State University, and a master’s degreehis Master’s Degree in Urban and Regional Planning and has a J.D. from the University of Florida.
Melissa V. Hoggatt was appointed senior vice president and chief information officer effective April 20, 2019, having previously served as first vice president and interim chief information officer since December of 2018. Prior to that she was Director of Financial Operations Management from 2014. Ms. Hoggatt joined the Bank in 2012 as the Director of Community Investment Services Production and Compliance Operations. Ms. Hoggatt received a B.S. in Psychology from the University of Alabama and her Executive MBA from Georgia State University.
Annette Hunter was appointed director of business operations effective November 1, 2019, having previously served as director of accounting operations since 2006. In that role, Ms. Hunter is responsible for the daily accounting operations of the derivatives, investments, consolidated obligations, advances and purchased mortgage portfolios, as well as financial operations management. Ms. Hunter was promoted from first vice president to senior vice president in 2015. Ms. Hunter joined the Bank in 2002 as manager of derivative and investment operations. Prior to joining the Bank, she served in various managerial accounting roles at Mirant Corporation, Louis Dreyfus Energy Corporation and Continental Hydraulic Hose. Ms. Hunter earned a B.S. in Business Administration from The Ohio State University and an M.B.A. from Kennesaw State University. She is a certified public accountant.
Haig H. Kazazian, III was appointed chief financial officer effective November 1, 2019, having previously served as treasurer since 2013. Mr. Kazazian joined the Bank as a credit analyst in 1992 and earned promotions to manager of national accounts and product development in 2001, first vice president in 2005, manager of national accounts and capital markets trading in 2009, and manager of treasury analysis and national accounts sales and trading in 2011, and senior vice president in 2014. Mr. Kazazian oversees the Bank’s accounting operations and services, financial operations management, member sales, trading and education, and treasury function. He is a chartered financial analyst and earned an M.B.A. and a B.A. in economics, each from Emory University. Mr. Kazazian was an M.B.A. Fellowship Recipient.
Robert S. KovachDawn Gehring has served as senior vice president, chief credithuman resources officer since 2012, directing2021, having previously served as director of human resources since 2016. Ms. Gehring is responsible for executing the Bank’s credithuman resources strategies to include: talent acquisition, total rewards, employee development, workforce diversity and collateralinclusion, and human resources compliance. Ms. Gehring also leads the Bank’s staff services and collateral riskproperty management operations.functions, which include facilities operations, tenant leasing, security, print and mail services, and procurement. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Gehring served as vice president of global human resources for a multi-national service provider in 2010 as directorthe power and energy industry. In this role, she was a member of collateral services, Mr. Kovach servedthe Executive Leadership Team, and was compliance officer for the company, responsible for the strategic management of a variety of human resources functions. Ms. Gehring’s additional experience includes human resources roles with FHLBank Pittsburgh from 1996 to 2010, including director of collateral services, chief investment officer,in the manufacturing and director of internal audit. He also served as a field manager and a senior examiner for the Office of Thrift Supervision. Mr. Kovach holds a chartered financial analyst designation andconsumer products industries. Ms. Gehring earned a B.S. in chemistryB.A from Dickinson College.the University of Iowa.
Leslie H. Schreiner haswas promoted to senior vice president, chief diversity, equity, and inclusion officer, effective January 1, 2023, having served as first vice president, director of diversity and inclusion, since July 2018. She is responsible for the oversight and implementation of the Bank’s Diversitydiversity, equity and Inclusion Program.inclusion program. From 2016 to 2018, she served as Directordirector of Strategic Planningstrategic planning and Accounting Services,accounting services, responsible for the Bank’s strategic planning and budgeting process, business intelligence initiatives, as well as accounts payable, fixed assets and expense reimbursement. Ms. Schreiner joined the Bank in 2007 as Directordirector of Accounting Automationaccounting automation and Technical Compliance.technical compliance. Prior to joining the Bank, she held various senior accounting roles with Resources Global, Primis and Information America. Leslie earned a B.A. in Accountingaccounting from University of Georgia and M.B.A in Finance from Georgia State University. She is a certified public accountant, and certified diversity professional.professional and a certified diversity, equity and inclusion coach.
William T. Shaw has served as senior vice president, controller of the Bank since 2014, being promoted from first vice president to senior vice president effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Shaw joined the Bank in 2008 as the manager of accounting policy and was subsequently promoted to director of accounting policy and financial reporting. Mr. Shaw oversees the Bank’s accounting, financial reporting, accounting policy, budgeting, and derivatives hedge accounting. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Shaw served as assistant controller for First Charter Corporation, directorDirector of SEC reporting for Novelis Inc., manager of inspections with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and was a manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. He received his B.S. in accounting and master’s degreeMaster’s Degree in accountancy from Brigham Young University. He is also a certified public accountant.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This section describes and analyzes the Bank’s 20202022 compensation program for:
•the chief executive officer,officer;
•the chief financial officer,officer; and
•the three other most highly-compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2020, and
•one additional individual who served as an executive officer during 2020 but who was not serving as an executive officer on December 31, 2020.2022.
These executive officers are collectively referred to as the Bank’s “named executive officers.”
The Bank’s named executive officers during 20202022 are identified in the following table.
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Title |
W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Haig H. Kazazian III(1) | | SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Alp E. Can | | Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer |
Reginald T. O’ShieldsK. Annette Hunter(2)
| | Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer |
Robert S. Kovach | | Senior Vice President and Chief Credit OfficerDirector of Business Operations |
Kirk R. MalmbergReginald T. O’Shields(1)(3)
| | Former Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingLegal and Compliance Officer |
_________________
(1) Mr. Malmberg retiredKazazian was promoted to Executive Vice President as of January 1, 2022. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President.
(2) Ms. Hunter served as Senior Vice President during 2022. She was promoted to Executive Vice President effective as of January 1, 2023.
(3)Mr. O’Shields’ title was changed to Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Compliance Officer on November 30, 2020.February 14, 2022. His previous title was Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer.
Philosophy and Objectives
The Bank’s compensation philosophy and objectives are to attract, motivate, and retain high caliber financial services executives capable of achieving strategic business initiatives, enhancing business performance and increasing shareholder value. The Bank’s compensation program is designed to reward this performance and enhanced value and to offer competitive compensation elements that align its executives’ incentives with the interests of its members. To mitigate unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by executive management, the Bank’s incentive compensation plan contains overall Bank performance goals that are dependent on an aggregation of transactions throughout the Bank and that cannot be individually altered by executive management. The incentive compensation plan contains quantitative components that are evaluated by the board of directors. Additionally, the board of directors maintains discretionary authority over all incentive compensation awards, giving the board of directors the flexibility to review Bank performance throughout the year and to adjust incentive compensation accordingly.
Elements of Compensation
The Bank compensates its executive officers with a combination of base salary, incentive compensation, and benefits. The Bank is unable to offer equity-related compensation because it is a cooperative, and only member financial institutions may own its capital stock. Accordingly, the Bank offers other compensation elements, such as qualified and non-qualified defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, to motivate long-term performance and encourage retention. Because the Bank is exempt from federal taxes, the deductibility of compensation is not relevant to compensation plan design. The elements of the Bank’s compensation program for executive officers, and the objective of each compensation element, are described below.
Base salary. Base salary is established on the basis of the ongoing duties associated with managing a particular set of functions at the Bank and provides an amount of fixed compensation. Each executive’s base salary is also is used as a basis in calculating the executive’s annual incentive award opportunity, as described below.
Incentive compensation. The Bank provides an annual cash award opportunity under its Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) to executive officers based on the achievement of quantitative goals set and evaluated by the board of directors. To promote consistently high corporate performance on a long-term basis and enhance the retention of key senior executive officers,
payment of fifty percent of any ICP granted to a named executive officer is deferred and distributed over a three-year period, together with positive or negative returns (Deferred Incentive)Incentives).The named executive officers’ ICP awards and Deferred IncentiveIncentives are subject to adjustment or forfeiture in certain events as described below under “2020“2022 Weights and Awards-Incentive Compensation Plan Award Adjustment or Forfeiture.”
Benefits. The Bank provides retirement benefits to promote executive retention, and the executive officers are eligible to participate in the same benefit plans that are made available to other employees of the Bank, such as medical,health, group term life and long-term disability coverage. The Bank also provides limited perquisites to executive officers.
Executive Compensation Process
Board and committee consideration of executive compensation. The Bank’s board of directors establishes the Bank’s executive compensation philosophy and objectives and has final approval of any compensation decisions related to the Bank’s chief executive officer (CEO), all officers reporting directly to the CEO who are senior vice presidents or higher, and any officer determined to be a named executive officer in the prior year. The governance and compensation committee of the board of directors advises and assists the board and makes recommendations to the board relating to compensation of such officers.
The CEO reviews and recommends to the board the base salary of the officers who report directly to him and who are senior vice president and higher level officers. The CEO also determinesapproves the base salary of all other senior vice president officers (other than the chief audit officer and, as noted above, any officer determined to be a named executive officer the prior year)officer) within an overall budget approved by the board of directors.
Use of compensation consultant. The governance and compensation committee of the board of directors selected and engaged Willis Towers WatsonAon plc (“Aon”) to provide assistance in evaluating the Bank’s executive compensation programs for 2020. Willis Towers Watson reports2022. Aon reported directly to the committee and the board with respect to executive compensation.
Consideration of competitive compensation levels. The Bank’s executive compensation program is designed to be appropriately competitive with prevailing practices in the broader financial services industry, consistent with the Bank’s business and risk profile. As part of each compensation review process for 2022, the board considered base salary, targetbonus compensation, total cash compensation, long-term compensation and target total direct compensation at a peer group consisting of (1) the medianother FHLBanks (2) commercial banks with assets over $20 billion. In addition to the other FHLBanks, the Bank believes that the other institutions included in this peer group present a breadth and 75th percentiles at (1) FHLBankslevel of similar size and complexity based on total assets, advance activity, membership, and scope of operations that are generally comparable to the Bank. With respect to Mr. Malmberg and (2) certainMr. Kazazian, the board also considered an additional peer group of public proxy peers with assets between $10 billion and $20 billion. Generally, it is the Bank’s overall intent to provide executive officers with total direct compensation, comprised of base salary and targeted incentive opportunities, at or above the competitive market median for comparable commercial banks andpositions, recognizing other comparable financial services organizations. The companiesinstitutions provide equity awards that were included in the peer groups for 2020 are listed below in “Compensation Decisions in 2020 — Overview.” The board used this dataBank is unable to assess competitive levels ofprovide. However, when setting the compensation for the Bank’s executives, andthe board did not target any named executive officer’s compensation to a specific percentilequartile of such executive officer’s comparable position in the peer groups.
The board does not evaluate specifically the multiples by which a named executive officer’s cash compensation is greater than that of non-executive employees when setting executive compensation. The Bank is exempt from SEC proxy rules and certain compensation disclosure that is required in proxy statements and accordingly does not provide shareholder advisory “say on pay” votes regarding executive compensation.
Finance Agency oversight of executive compensation. Pursuant to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, the Director prohibits the FHLBanks from providing to any executive officer compensation that is not reasonable and comparable with compensation for employment in other similar businesses involving similar duties and responsibilities. FHLBanks may not transfer, disburse, or pay compensation to any executive officer, or enter into an agreement with such executive officer, without the approval of the Director. Pursuant to this authority and a Finance Agency final rule on executive compensation (12 CFR Part 1230), the FHLBanks are required to report to the Director all compensation actions relating to the president, the chief financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated officers at least 30 days in advance of any board decision with respect to those actions, and at least 60 days prior to entering into any written arrangement that provides incentive awards to any executive officer. At any time before an executive compensation action is taken, the Director may require an FHLBank to withhold any payment, transfer, or disbursement of compensation to an executive officer, or to place such compensation in an escrow account, or prohibit the action. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act also sets rules on permissible “golden parachute” payments and authorizes the Director to prohibit the Bank from making any “golden parachute”such payments to its officers, employees, and directors. The Director has the power to approve, disapprove, or modify the executive compensation of the FHLBanks.
In addition, Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2009-AB-02 established five principles for executive compensation by the FHLBanks and the Office of Finance:
•executive compensation must be reasonable and comparable to that offered to executives in similar positions at other comparable financial institutions;
•executive incentive compensation should be consistent with sound risk management and preservation of the par value of the FHLBank’s capital stock;
•a significant percentage of an executive’s incentive-based compensation should be tied to longer-term performance and outcome indicators;
•a significant percentage of an executive’s incentive-based compensation should be deferred and made contingent upon the FHLBank’s financial performance over several years; and
•the FHLBank’s board of directors should promote accountability and transparency in the process of setting compensation.
In 2020, theThe Finance Agency providedrequires that the FHLBanks further guidancemaintain a risk management program to supplement these principlesassess and manage potential risks relating to clarifymanagement’s performance goals, objectives, and reiterate certain of the statutory and regulatory provision. Under the capital classifications rules issued by thecompensation structure. The Finance Agency may prohibit or restrict a significantly undercapitalized FHLBank is prohibited from taking certain actions relating to the compensation of its executives, including paying any bonus to an executive officer or giving any salary increase toincreasing an executive officerofficer’s salary, without the prior written approval of the Director. The Bank was not undercapitalized during 2020.2022.
Compensation Decisions for 20202022
Overview
The board of directors bases its compensation decisions on both objective criteria related to the Bank’s performance and subjective criteria related to each executive’s performance. Among the various criteria the board considered in evaluating the named executive officers’ performance were:
•achievement of performance objectives for 20202022 as determined by the board;
•fulfillment of the Bank’s public policy mission;
•demonstration of leadership and vision for the Bank;
•implementation and maintenance of effective business strategies and operations, legal and regulatory compliance programs, risk management activities, and internal controls commensurate with the Bank’s size, scope, and complexity;
•establishment and maintenance of strong relationships between the Bank and its customers, shareholders, employees,
regulators, and other stakeholders; and
•the Bank’s 20202022 financial results.
As part of the compensation review process for compensation to be paid in 2022, the board engaged Aon in 2021 to provide competitive market compensation ranges for Messrs. Malmberg, Can, O’Shields and Kazazian and Ms. Hunter (the “Aon Study”). The Aon Study involved an analysis of total compensation for comparable positions at the following 116 institutions, each a commercial bank with assets over $20 billion, as well as the other FHLBanks.
| | | | | | | | |
•ABNAMRO | •Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond | •National Australia Bank |
•AIB | •Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco | •Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking |
•Ally Financial Inc. | •Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis | •NatWest |
•Ameris Bank | •Fifth Third Bank | •New York Community Bank |
•Arvest Bank | •First Citizens Bank - NC | •Nomura Securities |
•Associated Bank | •First National Bank of Omaha | •Nord/LB |
•Australia & New Zealand Banking Group | •First Republic Bank | •Northern Trust Corporation |
•Bank ABC | •First Tennessee Bank/ First Horizon | •OCBC Bank |
•Bank of America | •Freddie Mac | •OneMain Financial |
•Bank of New York Mellon | •Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta | •People's United Financial, Inc. |
•Bank of Nova Scotia | •Federal Reserve Bank of Boston | •PNC Bank |
•Bank of the West | •Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago | •Rabobank |
•BBVA Compass | •Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City | •Regions Financial Corporation |
•BMO Financial Group | •Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis | •Royal Bank of Canada |
•BNP Paribas | •Federal Reserve Bank of New York | •Sallie Mae |
•BOK Financial Corporation | •Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond | •Santander Bank, N.A. |
•Brown Brothers Harriman | •Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco | •Siemens Financial Services |
•Capital One | •Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis | •Signature Bank - NY |
•Charles Schwab & Co. | •Fifth Third Bank | •Societe Generale |
•CIBC World Markets | •First Citizens Bank - NC | •Standard Chartered Bank |
•CIT Group Inc. | •First National Bank of Omaha | •State Street Corporation |
•Citigroup | •First Republic Bank | •Sterling National Bank |
•Citizens Financial Group | •First Tennessee Bank/ First Horizon | •Sumitomo |
•City National Bank | •Freddie Mac | •SVB Financial Group |
•Comerica | •Frost Bank | •Synovus Financial Corporation |
•Commerce Bank | •Hancock Whitney Bank | •TD Securities |
•Commerzbank | •HSBC | •Texas Capital Bank |
•Commonwealth Bank of Australia | •Huntington Bancshares, Inc. | •Truist |
•Credit Agricole CIB | •ING | •U.S. Bancorp |
•Credit lndustriel et Commercial- N.Y. | •Intesa Sanpaolo | •UMB Financial Corporation |
•DNB Bank | •Investec Bank | •UniCredit Bank AG |
•East West Bancorp, Inc. | •Investors Bancorp, Inc. | •United Overseas Bank Group |
•Fannie Mae | •JP Morgan Chase | •Valley National Bancorp |
•Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta | •KBC Bank | •Webster Bank |
• Federal Reserve Bank of Boston | •KeyCorp | •Wells Fargo Bank |
•Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago | •Lloyds Banking Group | •Zions Bancorporation |
•Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City | •M&T Bank Corporation | |
•Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis | •Macquarie Bank | |
•Federal Reserve Bank of New York | •MUFG Bank, Ltd. | |
The value of retirement plans and other benefits were not specifically considered as part of the Aon study. To account for differences in the size and scope of the comparable positions included in the Aon Study, low quartile data (25th percentile), median data (50th percentile) or high quartile data (75th percentile) was selected for each of those jobs to develop a market composite comparison for each of the positions held by the applicable named executive officers. In the case of the other FHLBanks, executive to executive comparisons were made at the high quartile to account for the Bank’s size and scope. In the case of the commercial bank peers, divisional head comparisons were used to identify the jobs with the closest functional responsibilities to the applicable named executive officers, and executive comparisons were made at the median data. For purposes of the Bank’s comparative analysis, total direct compensation within +/- 15 percent of the median market composite compensation was considered to be within the competitive market range.
The Aon Study involved an analysis of total compensation for comparable positions at the 116 institutions listed above and the other FHLBanks. An additional peer group was considered at the following 40 institutions, public proxy peers with assets between $10 billion and $20 billion:
| | | | | |
•Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation | •Hope Bancorp, Inc. |
•Banner Corporation | •Independent Bank Corp. |
•Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | •Independent Bank Group, Inc. |
•Cadence Bancorporation | •International Bancshares Corporation |
•Cathay General Bancorp | •NBT Bancorp Inc. |
•Columbia Banking System, Inc. | •Northwest Bancshares, Inc. |
•Community Bank System, Inc. | •OceanFirst Financial Corp. |
•Customers Bancorp, Inc. | •Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. |
•CVB Financial Corp. | •Provident Financial Services, Inc. |
•Eagle Bancorp, Inc. | •Renasant Corporation |
•Eastern Bankshares, Inc. | •Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. |
•First Busey Corporation | •ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. |
•First Financial Bancorp. | •TFS Financial Corporation |
•First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | •TowneBank |
•First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. | •Trustmark Corporation |
•First Merchants Corporation | •United Community Banks, Inc. |
•Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | •Washington Federal, Inc. |
•Heartland Financial USA, Inc. | •WesBanco, Inc. |
•Home Bancshares, Inc. | •WSFS Financial Corporation |
Base Salary
In determiningsetting the base salary forsalaries of the named executive officers for 2022, the board considered data developed by Willis Towers Watson regardingtook into consideration the cash compensation provided by a combinationresults of three different groups:
(1) the following FHLBanks deemed to be of similar size and complexity based on total assets, advance activity, membership, and scope of operations (FHLB Peers):
| | | | | | | | |
•FHLBank Chicago
| | •FHLBank New York
|
•FHLBank Cincinnati
| | •FHLBank Pittsburgh
|
•FHLBank Des Moines
| | •FHLBank San Francisco
|
(2) the following commercial banks with assets between $20 billion and $65 billion, plus one additional commercial bank with assets of $70.8 billionAon Study, which showed that had historically been included in the commercial bank peer group (Commercial Bank Peers):
| | | | | | | | |
• Associated Banc-Corp | | • Popular |
• City National Bank | | • Iberia Bank |
• Comerica | | • People’s Bank |
• Commerce Bancshares | | • Synovus Financial Corporation |
• Cullen Frost Bankers | | • SVB Financial |
• First Citizens Bank | | • Webster Bank |
• Wintrust Financial Corporation | | • TCF Financial |
The median asset size for the Commercial Bank Peers was $33.2 billion.
(3) the following financial services organizations with assets generally between $20 billion and $65 billion, plus three additional financial services organizations with assets between $69.2 billion and $71.6 billion (Financial Service Peers):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| • Alliance Data Systems | | • People’s Bank |
| • Anthem | | • Popular |
| • Associated Banc-Corp | | • Progressive |
| • Centene | | • Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) |
| • City National Bank | | • SVB Financial |
| • CNO Financial | | • Synovus Financial Corporation |
| • Comerica | | • TCF Financial |
| • Commerce Bancshares | | • TD Ameritrade |
| • Cullen Frost Bankers | | • Unum |
| • First Citizens Bank | | • Visa |
| • Great American Insurance | | • Webster Bank |
| • Iberia Bank | | • Wintrust Financial Corporation |
The median asset size for the Financial Service Peers was $36.5 billion.
The board considered data from the FHLB Peers for each of the named executive officers. In addition, the board considered data from the Commercial Bank Peers for Messrs. McMullan, O’Shieldsthese executive’s base salary and Kazazian, and from the Financial Service Peers for Messrs. Malmberg, Kovach and Can.
According to the data provided to the board by Willis Towers Watson,
•Target total direct compensation for each of Mr. McMullan, Mr. Kazazian, and Mr. O’Shields wastargeted incentive opportunities were at or below the lower bound of the competitive market median target total direct compensation for both the FHLB Peershis or her position when compared with commercial Banks and the Commercial Bank Peers;
•Target total direct compensation for each of Mr. Can and Mr. Malmberg was below the median target total direct compensation for both the FHLB Peers and the Financial Service Peers; and
•Target total direct compensation for Mr. Kovach was above the median target total direct compensation for both the FHLB Peers and the Financial Service Peers.
comparable when compared with other Federal Home Loan Banks. After reviewing the Bank’s performance and the performance of each of the named executive officers during fiscal year 2019,2021, the board set:set the named executive officers’ salaries at the following amounts:
•Mr. McMullan’s base salary for 2020 at $950,000, which was an increase of 1.60 percent from 2019; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Base Salary | | Percent Change from 2021 |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | $910,000 | | 4.00 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 440,000 | | | 3.53 | |
Alp E. Can (1) | | 500,000 | | | 17.65 | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | 358,938 | | | 3.50 | |
| Reginald O'Shields | | 440,000 | | | 3.53 | |
_________________
•(1)Mr. Kazazian’s base salary for 2020 at $405,000, which was an increase of 10.66 percent from 2019;
•Mr. Can’s base salary for 2020January 1, 2022 to July 1, 2022 was set at $415,000,$440,000, which was an increase of 22.063.53 percent from 2019;
•December, 2021 and then Mr. O’Shield’s baseCan’s salary for 2020July 2, 2022 to December 31, 2022 was set at $415,000,which was an$500,000. Mr. Can’s total salary increase of 11.3317.65 percent from 2019;
•Mr. Kovach’s base salary for 2020 at $423,300, which2021 was an increase of 2.00 percent from 2019; and
•Mr. Malmberg’s base salary for 2020 at $615,000, which was an increase of 12.84 percent from 2019.determined to reflect retention efforts in a competitive labor market environment consistent with Bank’s compensation philosophy.
The board based these decisions, in part, on the following:
•Mr. Kazazian was promoted to Chief Financial Officer and assumed additional responsibilities related to the Bank’s accounting operations.
•Mr. O’Shields and Mr. Can were each promoted to Executive Vice President and assumed additional responsibilities for the Bank’s corporate communications and government relations, and credit and collateral functions, respectively.
•Mr. Malmberg was named Chief Operating Officer and assumed additional responsibilities related to the Bank’s sales and trading and community investment services operations.Business results generated during 2021;
Due to the cumulative impact of the leap year schedule, coupled with the Bank’s biweekly payroll processing schedule in 2020, all Bank employees were paid for 27 pay periods instead of the standard 26. Pay associated with all 27 pay periods is included in column (c) of the Summary Compensation Table.•Pension benefitsSafe and bonus earned in 2020 were calculated using base salary noted above.sound operations during 2021; and
•Comparable compensation provided at similar organizations, as reflected in the Aon Study.
Incentive Compensation
The following table presents the 20202022 award opportunities, as established by the board under the ICP, expressed as a percentage of base pay earnings during the year.
20202022 Award Opportunities
| | | Percent of Base Salary (%) | | Percent of Base Salary (%) |
| Title | Title | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | Title | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | President and Chief Executive Officer | | 50.00 | | 75.00 | | 100.00 | President and Chief Executive Officer | | 50.00 | | 75.00 | | 100.00 |
| Executive Vice Presidents | Executive Vice Presidents | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 | Executive Vice Presidents | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 | |
| | Senior Vice Presidents | Senior Vice Presidents | | 30.00 | | 50.00 | | 70.00 | Senior Vice Presidents | | 30.00 | | 50.00 | | 70.00 |
For 2020,2022, the board established threefour incentive goals under the ICP, which correlatecorrelated to the shareholder focus, and risk management performance and diversity, equity and inclusion priorities reflected in the Bank’s strategic plan. Each of these goals is described in more detail below. Awards for executive vice presidents and senior vice presidents also included individual and team goals. The board of directors established threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for each quantitative incentive goal. Each goal’s “target” performance level is consistent with the assumptions set forth in the Bank’s annual operating budget, forecasts, and strategic plan. The “threshold” and “maximum” performance levels are designed to reward partial attainment of the goal and performance beyond the forecasted levels, respectively. Factors considered in setting the various performance levels include management’s projections concerning economic conditions, interest rates, demand for advances products, and balance sheet structure.
In addition, to ensure continued focus on the Bank’s Diversity and Inclusion Plan, the 2020 ICP provides that annual incentive awards to the named executive officers may be reduced by up to 10 percent to the extent that the board of directors, in its sole
discretion, determines that certain Bank-wide activity goals related to workforce development, outreach to diverse vendors, and engagement with diverse shareholders have not been achieved.
The following tables provide the weights and awards for each performance target as a percentage of base salary that the board established for 2020.2022. A description of each of the performance metrics, and the performance against such metrics in 2020,2022, is provided following the tables.
20202022 Weights and Awards
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | President and Chief Executive Officer | | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
| (Mr. McMullan) | | | | Percent of Base Salary | |
| (Mr. Malmberg) | | (Mr. Malmberg) | | | | Percent of Base Salary |
| Goal | Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) | Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) |
| Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 34.00 | | 17.00 | | 25.50 | | 34.00 | Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 30.00 | | 15.00 | | 22.50 | | 30.00 |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 33.00 | | 16.50 | | 24.75 | | 33.00 | Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 30.00 | | 15.00 | | 22.50 | | 30.00 |
| Risk Management - ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBOR | | 33.00 | | 16.50 | | 24.75 | | 33.00 | |
| Shareholder Focus - ROE Spread to Average SOFR | | Shareholder Focus - ROE Spread to Average SOFR | | 30.00 | | 15.00 | | 22.50 | | 30.00 |
| Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | 10.00 | | 5.00 | | 7.50 | | 10.00 |
| Total (1) | | 100.00 | | 50.00 | | 75.00 | | 100.00 | |
| Total | | Total | | 100.00 | | 50.00 | | 75.00 | | 100.00 |
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | | |
| (Mr. Kazazian, III) | | Percent of Base Salary | |
| Executive Vice President | | Executive Vice President | | |
| (Mr. Kazazian and Mr. O’Shields) | | (Mr. Kazazian and Mr. O’Shields) | | Percent of Base Salary |
| Goal | Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) | Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) |
| Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 | Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 | Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 |
| Risk Management - ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBOR | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 | |
| Shareholder Focus - ROE Spread to Average SOFR | | Shareholder Focus - ROE Spread to Average SOFR | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 |
| Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | 10.00 | | 3.50 | | 6.00 | | 12.75 |
| Individual and Team Goals | Individual and Team Goals | | 25.00 | | 8.75 | | 15.00 | | 21.25 | Individual and Team Goals | | 15.00 | | 5.25 | | 9.00 | | 8.50 |
Total (1) | | 100.00 | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 | |
| Total | | Total | | 100.00 | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 |
| | Executive Vice President | | | |
| (Messrs. O’Shields and Malmberg) | | | | Percent of Base Salary | |
| Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) | |
| Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 34.00 | | 11.90 | | 20.40 | | 28.90 | |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 33.00 | | 11.55 | | 19.80 | | 28.05 | |
| Risk Management - ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBOR | | 33.00 | | 11.55 | | 19.80 | | 28.05 | |
| Total (1) | | 100.00 | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 | |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer | | | |
| (Mr. Can) | | Percent of Base Salary | |
| Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) | |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 40.00 | | 14.00 | | 24.00 | | 34.00 | |
| Individual and Team Goals | | 60.00 | | 21.00 | | 36.00 | | 51.00 | |
Total (1) | | 100.00 | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 | |
| | Senior Vice President | | | |
| (Mr. Kovach) | | | | Percent of Base Salary | |
| Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) | |
| Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 | |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 | |
| Risk Management - ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBOR | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 | |
| Individual and Team Goals | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 | |
| Total (1) | | 100.00 | | 30.00 | | 50.00 | | 70.00 | |
__________
(1) Total amount subject to up to 10 percent reduction to the extent that the board of directors determines that certain Bank-wide activity goals related to workforce development, outreach to diverse vendors, and engagement with diverse shareholders have not been achieved. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer | | | | | | | | |
| (Mr. Can) | | | | Percent of Base Salary |
| Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 40.00 | | 14.00 | | 24.00 | | 34.00 |
| Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | 10.00 | | 3.50 | | 6.00 | | 8.50 |
| Individual and Team Goals | | 50.00 | | 17.50 | | 30.00 | | 42.50 |
| Total | | 100.00 | | 35.00 | | 60.00 | | 85.00 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Senior Vice President | | | | | | | | |
| (Ms. Hunter) | | | | Percent of Base Salary |
| Goal | | Weight (%) | | Threshold (%) | | Target (%) | | Maximum (%) |
| Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 |
| Risk Management - Risk Appetite | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 |
| Shareholder Focus - ROE Spread to Average SOFR | | 25.00 | | 7.50 | | 12.50 | | 17.50 |
| Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | | 10.00 | | 3.00 | | 5.00 | | 7.00 |
| Individual and Team Goals | | 15.00 | | 4.50 | | 7.50 | | 10.50 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total | | 100.00 | | 30.00 | | 50.00 | | 70.00 |
The Shareholder Focus - Shareholder Activity goal measuresmeasured the average utilization of the Bank’s products and services by shareholders during 2020.2022. Performance under this measure was determined by calculating the total product utilization by shareholders as of December 31, 2020,2022, referred to as activity points, over the daily average number of shareholders for each business day of 2020.2022. The performance goals were2.395 2.00 (threshold), 2.5102.20 (target) and 2.6252.40 (maximum) activity points per shareholder.This goal was substantially the same for each named executive officer, with the exception of Mr. Can (who did not have this performance metric), and performance was determined on an overall Bank-wide basis. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank achieved a shareholder activity performance score of 2.5412.437 activity points per shareholder. Based on 20202022 performance, the board awarded between the target and maximum level for this goal.
The Risk Management - Risk Appetite goal involvesinvolved managing the Bank’s key risks at appropriate tolerance levels. Under this measure, the board and management defined the Bank’s key risks and the tolerance levels with respect to those risks. The Bank then scored each key risk based upon whether the Bank was satisfying the defined tolerance level. If the Bank was performing at or better than the defined tolerance level for all key risks, a risk appetite performance score of 100 was achieved. A deduction was applied to the risk appetite performance score for each key risk performing below the defined tolerance level. The amount that was deducted depended upon the extent of the underperformance. The performance goals were 85.0 percent risk appetite performance score (threshold), 95.0 percent risk appetite performance score (target), and 100 percent risk appetite performance score (maximum). This goal was substantially the same for each named executive officer, with the exception of Mr. Can (whose overall weighting for this goal was higher, consistent with his role as Chief Risk Officer), and performance was determined on an overall Bank-wide basis. As of December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank achieved a risk appetite performance score of 95.2495.93 percent. Based upon that score, the board awarded between the target and maximum level for this goal.
The Risk ManagementShareholder Focus - ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBORAverage SOFR performance goal relatesrelated to the Bank’s ROE amount in excess of average three-month LIBOR.SOFR. This performance measure reflects the Bank’s ability to pay quarterly dividends to its members and was established with a sliding scale so that the spread performance metrics become smaller as LIBORSOFR increases. The board of directors could reduce the award for this measure or increase the required ROE spread to LIBORaverage SOFR under certain economic scenarios.scenarios but those have not occurred during 2022. For 2020,2022, the performance goals were 32045 basis points (threshold), 33090 basis points (target), and 350115 basis points (maximum). This goal was substantially the same for each named executive officer, with the exception of Mr. Can (who did not have this performance metric), and performance was determined on an overall Bank-wide basis. In 2020,2022, the Bank’s ROE spread to average three-month LIBORSOFR was 357161 basis points. Based upon that calculation, the board awarded the maximum level for this goal.
The Diversity, Equity and Inclusion performance goal aligned with the Bank’s commitment to its diversity, equity and inclusion program and measured the Bank’s ability to operate in accordance with its board approved diversity, equity and inclusion strategy. This performance goal utilized the seven quantitative goals contained in the Bank’s 2022 diversity, equity and inclusion operational plan. These seven goals are in the areas of workforce, supplier, capital markets and partnership. Under this measure, the performance goals required achievement of three (threshold), four (target), or six (maximum) of the seven quantitative goals. In 2020,2022, five of these goals were achieved. Based on that achievement, the board awarded between the target and maximum level for this goal.
In 2022, the board of directors did not establish individual performance goals for the Messrs. McMullan, O’Shields, andMr. Malmberg.Individual goals for Mr. Can focused on LIBOR transition, diversity and inclusion, and data governance.Individual goals for Mr. Kazazian and Mr. Kovach focused on information technologyleadership initiatives, diversityMr. O’Shields focused on Environmental, Social and inclusion, LIBOR transition,Governance initiatives, Mr. Can focused on process improvement and data governance.risk management, and Ms. Hunter focused on leadership initiatives. Based upon performance in 2020,2022, Mr. Kazazian, Mr. Can, Ms. Hunter, and Mr. KovachO’Shields were awarded the maximum level for these goals.
The following table presents the final award level associated with each performance goal and total award amounts for each named executive officer.
20202022 Incentive Compensation Plan Awards
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Shareholder Activity (%) | | Risk Appetite (%) | | ROE Spread to 3-Month LIBOR (%) | | Individual/Team Goals (%) | | Total Award (%) of Base Salary | | Overall Award Level | | Total Calculated Award | | Deferred Incentive |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | 27.79 | | | 25.15 | | | 33.00 | | | — | | | 85.94 | | | Target-Max | $816,403 | | $408,202 |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 16.68 | | | 15.30 | | | 21.25 | | | 21.25 | | | 74.48 | | | Target-Max | 301,664 | | | 150,832 | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | | 22.69 | | | 20.20 | | | 28.05 | | | — | | | 70.94 | | | Target-Max | 294,390 | | | 147,195 | |
| Alp E. Can | | — | | | 24.48 | | | — | | | 51.00 | | | 75.48 | | | Target-Max | 313,242 | | | 156,621 | |
| Robert S. Kovach | | 13.85 | | | 12.74 | | | 17.50 | | | 17.50 | | | 61.59 | | | Target-Max | 260,701 | | | 130,351 | |
Kirk R. Malmberg (1) | | 22.69 | | | 20.20 | | | 28.05 | | | — | | | 70.94 | | | Target-Max | 412,774 | | | — | |
____________
(1) Mr. Malmberg retired on November 30, 2020 and in accordance with the terms of the Bank’s incentive compensation plan, his total calculated award was not subject to deferral. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Shareholder Activity (%) | | Risk Appetite (%) | | ROE Spread to average SOFR (%) | | Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (%) | | Individual/Team Goals (%) | | Total Award (%) of Base Salary | | Overall Award Level | | Total Calculated Award | | Deferred Incentive |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | 30.00 | | | 23.90 | | | 30.00 | | | 8.75 | | | N/A | | 92.65 | | | Target-Max | $ | 843,136 | | | $ | 421,568 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 21.25 | | | 16.17 | | | 21.25 | | | 7.25 | | | 12.75 | | | 78.67 | | | Target-Max | 346,143 | | | 173,071 | |
| Alp E. Can | | N/A | | 25.87 | | | N/A | | 7.25 | | | 42.50 | | | 75.62 | | | Target-Max | 355,418 | | | 177,709 | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | 17.50 | | | 13.43 | | | 17.50 | | | 6.00 | | | 10.50 | | | 64.93 | | | Target-Max | 233,076 | | | 116,538 | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | | 21.25 | | | 16.17 | | | 21.25 | | | 7.25 | | | 12.75 | | | 78.67 | | | Target-Max | 346,143 | | | 173,071 | |
The amount of incentive compensation earned by each of the named executive officers under the ICP, as shown in the “Total Calculated Award” column in the preceding table is reflected underincluded in the “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan” column in the Summary Compensation Table below.below, along with interest earned in 2022 on Deferred Incentives. For the Bank’s current named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Malmberg as noted above, the Deferred Incentive portion will be paid, together with positive or negative returns (equal to the Bank’s return on equity for the applicable year) over three years (2022-2024)(2024-2026) on the following schedule, subject to certain adjustment and forfeiture provisions discussed below:
Deferred Incentive Payout Schedule
| | | | | | | | |
| Payment Year | | Payment |
20222024 | | 1/3 of balance (± 1-year return) |
20232025 | | 1/2 of balance (± 2-year return) |
20242026 | | Remaining balance (± 3-year return) |
Incentive Compensation Plan Award Adjustment or Forfeiture. The named executive officers’ ICP awards and Deferred Incentive are subject to adjustment or forfeiture in certain events. Under the terms of the ICP, the board of directors has reserved the right to amend, modify or terminate the ICP, in whole or in part, and to increase, decrease, terminate without penalty or payment, or otherwise modify any ICP award, at any time for any reason or no reason.
The board of directors has the authority to (i) equitably adjust ICP performance measures for a particular year under the ICP to preserve the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available to the participants for any merger, consolidation, rights offering, separation, reorganization or liquidation or any other change in the capital structure of the Bank and (ii) adjust Earned Awards (as defined in the ICP) for both current and prior years if the board determines in good faith that the amounts of any Earned Awards were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria as defined in the ICP. The board may, in its sole discretion, decline to adjust the terms of any outstanding Award, as defined, if it determines that such adjustment would violate applicable law or result in adverse tax consequences to the participant or to the Bank.
If as of the time any payment of the Deferred Incentive otherwise would be due, the board of directors has made a good faith determination that the Bank has not achieved certain objective financial performance threshold measures relating tosuch as retained
earnings (net of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)), market value of equity/par value of capital stock, regulatory capital to assets ratio, and positive annual net income, as determined at the board’s discretion, the board may in its sole discretion elect to reduce or eliminate such payment of the Deferred Incentive.
No adjustments to ICP performance measures or Earned Awards were made for ICP awards, nor reductions or eliminations of payments of a Deferred Incentive were made to named executive officers in 2022.
If a named executive officer’s employment with the Bank terminates for any reason prior to payment of any earned incentive compensation, all remaining payments (including the Deferred Incentive) will be forfeited, subject to certain limited exceptions if the named executive officer dies, becomes disabled, or retires, with a combination of age and years of service to the Bank totaling at least 70.
Other Performance Bonuses
In September 2022, Mr. Kazazian received a one-time performance related discretionary bonus of $5,000 and Mr. Can received a one-time performance related discretionary bonus of $15,000. These amounts are included in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table below.
Retirement Benefits
The named executive officers are eligible to participate in certain tax-qualified and non-qualified defined benefit, defined contribution, and deferred compensation plans. These plans are described in more detail below in the sections entitled “Executive Compensation — Pension Benefits” and “— Deferred Compensation.”
The Bank’s retirement benefit plans are a vital component of the Bank’s retention strategy for executive officers, particularly because many other competing organizations provide executive officers with economic benefits based on equity interests in the employer, oftentimes in addition to similar retirement benefits. The Bank is unable to offer equity-related compensation because it is a cooperative, and only member financial institutions may own its capital stock.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
All named executive officers are eligible to participate in the benefit plans that are made available to all employees of the Bank including medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage, group term life and long-term disability insurance coverage, paid vacation, and sick leave. The named executive officers generally participate in these plans on the same basis and terms as all other employees.
The Bank offers the named executive officers a limited number of perquisites, including an annual physical examination, guest travel to certain business functions, business club memberships, and financial planning services. For Mr. McMullan,Malmberg, the Bank also provides an automobile allowance of up to $1,500 per month. Because perquisites generally are limited, the board does not specifically consider perquisites when reviewing total compensation for any of the named executive officers.
Employment Arrangements and Severance Benefits
Other than the specific contractual arrangements discussed below, all Bank employees are employed under an “at will” arrangement. Accordingly, an employee may resign employment at any time, and the Bank may terminate the employee’s employment at any time for any reason, with or without cause.
The board of directors may, in its discretion, provide severance benefits to an executive officer in the event of termination of his/her employment. In determining whether severance compensation is appropriate, the board of directors considers both the factors underlying the termination of employment and the employment history of the executive officer. The Bank does not provide a “gross up” benefit on taxes incurred with respect to any severance.
Employment Agreement. The Bank entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. McMullan,Malmberg, effective January 1, 2014April 20, 2021 (Employment Agreement). Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s employment with the Bank may be terminated by the Bank with or without “cause,” or by Mr. McMullanMalmberg with or without “good reason,” as defined in the Employment Agreement. Unless earlier terminated by either party as provided therein, the Employment Agreement hadhas an initial three-year term and will continue to extend automatically for subsequent one-year periods unless either party elects not to renew. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, the Bank provides Mr. McMullan with a $1,500 per month automobile allowance. Mr. McMullanMalmberg is entitled to participate in all incentive, savings, and retirement plans and programs available to senior executives of the Bank. The Employment Agreement also provides for certain severance benefits for Mr. McMullan,Malmberg separately from those under the Change in Control Severance Plan, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” This severance arrangement was an integral and necessary component of the Bank’s strategy to recruit Mr. McMullanMalmberg to the president and CEO position.
Change in Control Severance Plan. Effective January 1, 2017, the Bank adopted an Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (Severance Plan). The purpose of the Severance Plan is to facilitate the hiring and retention of senior executives capable of executing the Bank’s strategic priorities, to ensure their continued dedication to the Bank notwithstanding the possibility of a change in control, and to provide them with certain protection and benefits in the event of certain termination events following a
defined change in control of the Bank. The board has designated Messrs. McMullan, Malmberg, Kazazian, Can and O’Shields as eligible to participate in the Severance Plan. Ms. Hunter became eligible to participate in the Severance Plan as at January 1, 2023. The Severance Plan is discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Report of the Board of Directors
The board of directors of the Bank has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above with management, and based on such review and discussion, the board of directors has determined that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above should be included in the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The board of directors of the Bank has primary responsibility for establishing and determining the Bank’s compensation program. Therefore, this report is submitted by the full board ofall current directors who were serving during 2020.2022.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| | | | | | | | |
Richard A. Whaley, Chairman | | Brian Argrett, Vice Chairman |
Travis Cosby, III | | Jonathan Kislak |
Suzanne S. DeFerie | | Kim C. Liddell |
R. Thornwell Dunlap, III | | Garrett S. Richter |
William C. Handorf | | John B. Rucker |
Scott C. Harvard | | Robert L. Strickland, Jr. |
Retirement Benefits
ExecutiveThe named executive officers are eligible to participate in certain tax-qualified and non-qualified defined benefit, defined contribution, and deferred compensation plans. These plans are described in more detail below in the sections entitled “Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Tables Pension Benefits” and “— Deferred Compensation.”
The following table presentsBank’s retirement benefit plans are a summaryvital component of cashthe Bank’s retention strategy for executive officers, particularly because many other competing organizations provide executive officers with economic benefits based on equity interests in the employer, oftentimes in addition to similar retirement benefits. The Bank is unable to offer equity-related compensation because it is a cooperative, and other compensation earned by theonly member financial institutions may own its capital stock.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
All named executive officers forare eligible to participate in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. It is important to read this table, and the other tablesbenefit plans that follow, closely and in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The narratives following the tables and the footnotes accompanying each table are important parts of each table.
2020 Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal
Position
(a) | | Year
(b) | | Salary
(c) | | Bonus (d) (2) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (e) (3) | | Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (f) (4) | | All Other
Compensation (g) (5) | | Total
(h) |
W. Wesley McMullan
President and Chief Executive Officer | | 2020 | | $ | 986,538 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 848,874 | | | $ | 3,969,392 | | | $ | 85,994 | | | $ | 5,890,898 | |
| 2019 | | 935,000 | | | 100 | | | 822,604 | | | 4,404,577 | | | 79,758 | | | 6,242,039 | |
| 2018 | | 835,000 | | | 2,100 | | | 858,804 | | | 941,627 | | | 75,881 | | | 2,713,412 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | 2020 | | 420,577 | | | 100 | | | 311,041 | | | 1,820,000 | | | 25,571 | | | 2,577,289 | |
| 2019 | | 366,000 | | | 100 | | | 232,009 | | | 1,517,000 | | | 22,847 | | | 2,137,956 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reginald O'Shields Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer | | 2020 | | 430,962 | | | 100 | | | 303,934 | | | 1,200,000 | | | 29,144 | | | 1,964,140 | |
| 2019 | | 372,750 | | | 100 | | | 236,286 | | | 905,000 | | | 22,521 | | | 1,536,657 | |
| 2018 | | 355,000 | | | 21,600 | | | 256,716 | | | 135,000 | | | 23,168 | | | 791,484 | |
| Alp E. Can, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer | | 2020 | | 430,962 | | 1,600 | | | 320,814 | | | 301,000 | | | 68,783 | | | 1,123,159 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Robert S. Kovach Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer | | 2020 | | 439,581 | | | 1,100 | | | 271,483 | | | 454,000 | | | 27,754 | | | 1,193,918 | |
| 2019 | | 415,000 | | | 100 | | | 263,473 | | | 553,000 | | | 25,206 | | | 1,256,779 | |
| 2018 | | 405,000 | | | 100 | | | 293,004 | | | — | | | 25,996 | | | 724,100 | |
Kirk R. Malmberg Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (1) | | 2020 | | 581,885 | | 1,500 | | | 427,342 | | | 3,689,157 | | | 121,985 | | | 4,821,869 | |
| 2019 | | 545,000 | | | 100 | | | 394,920 | | | 1,949,176 | | | 37,052 | | | 2,926,248 | |
| 2018 | | 520,000 | | | 100 | | | 451,668 | | | 548,299 | | | 36,343 | | | 1,556,410 | |
__________
(1) Mr. Malmberg retired on November 30, 2020.
(2) The amounts in column (d) reflect an annual $100 employee appreciation bonus provided to all employees of the Bank. The Bank provides all employees of the Bank, including the named executive officers, a tax gross-up on this bonus, which amount is included in column (g). The 2020 bonus amount includes an award payment of $1,000 for Mr. Kovach and an award payment of $1,500 for Mr. Can under the Bank’s Service Award Program to recognize employees with five or more years of service. The 2020 bonus amount for Mr. Malmberg includes an award payment of $1,500 to recognize retirees under the Bank’s Service Award Program. The Service Award Program is administered by the Bank’s human resources department and ismade available to all employees of the Bank underincluding medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage, group term life and long-term disability insurance coverage, paid vacation, and sick leave. The named executive officers generally participate in these plans on the same generalbasis and terms as all other employees.
The Bank offers the named executive officers a limited number of perquisites, including an annual physical examination, guest travel to certain business functions, business club memberships, and conditions. To the extentfinancial planning services. For Mr. Malmberg, the Bank provided a gross-up on such awards, those amountsalso provides an automobile allowance of up to $1,500 per month. Because perquisites generally are included in column (g).
(3) The amounts in column (e) reflectlimited, the dollar value of all earningsboard does not specifically consider perquisites when reviewing total compensation for services performed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 pursuant to awards under the ICP, even though fifty percent of the ICP awards for each year were subject to mandatory deferral and distribution over three years. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2020 non-equity incentive compensation awards were subject to a 30-day review period and receipt of non-objection by the Finance Agency. The Bank received written non-objection from the Finance Agency on February 17, 2021. The amounts in column (e) also include the dollar value of all interest during each year earned on Deferred Incentive related to ICP awards for prior fiscal years, in the following amounts for 2020: $32,471 for Mr. McMullan, $9,377 for Mr. Kazazian, $9,544 for Mr. O’Shields, $7,572 for Mr. Can, $10,782 for Mr. Kovach and $14,568 for Mr. Malmberg.
(4) The amounts in column (f) reflect the sum of (i) the aggregate change in the actuarial present valueany of the named executive officer’s aggregate pensionofficers.
Employment Arrangements and Severance Benefits
Other than the specific contractual arrangements discussed below, all Bank employees are employed under an “at will” arrangement. Accordingly, an employee may resign employment at any time, and the Bank may terminate the employee’s employment at any time for any reason, with or without cause.
The board of directors may, in its discretion, provide severance benefits to an executive officer in the event of termination of his/her employment. In determining whether severance compensation is appropriate, the board of directors considers both the factors underlying the termination of employment and the employment history of the executive officer. The Bank does not provide a “gross up” benefit on taxes incurred with respect to any severance.
Employment Agreement. The Bank entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Malmberg, effective April 20, 2021 (Employment Agreement). Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Malmberg’s employment with the Bank may be terminated by the Bank with or without “cause,” or by Mr. Malmberg with or without “good reason,” as defined in the Employment Agreement. Unless earlier terminated by either party as provided therein, the Employment Agreement has an initial three-year term and will continue to extend automatically for subsequent one-year periods unless either party elects not to renew. Mr. Malmberg is entitled to participate in all incentive, savings, and retirement plans and programs available to senior executives of the Bank. The Employment Agreement also provides for certain severance benefits for Mr. Malmberg separately from those under the Change in Control Severance Plan, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” This severance arrangement was an integral and necessary component of the Bank’s Pension and Defined Benefit Equalization Plan (DBEP) during each fiscal year, computed as described in footnote (1)strategy to recruit Mr. Malmberg to the 2020 Pension Benefits table,president and (ii) all “above market” earnings earned under the Bank’s non-qualified DCPs. Under SEC rules, “above-market” earnings result when deferrals are credited with interest in excess of 120 percent of the Applicable Federal Rate. The 2020 above-market amounts for Mr. McMullan and Mr. Malmberg were $54,392 and $10,157, respectively. These plans are described in greater detail below under “Pension Benefits” and “Deferred Compensation.”CEO position.
(5) The amounts in column (g) for 2020 consist of the following amounts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Bank Contributions under the 401(k) Plan | | Matching contributions under the Bank’s non-qualified Defined Contribution Benefit Equalization Plan | | Perquisite (1) | | Tax Gross-ups (2) | | Other (3) | | Total |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | $ | 15,769 | | | $ | 43,423 | | | $ | 26,759 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 85,994 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 17,100 | | | 8,135 | | | 293 | | | 43 | | | — | | | 25,571 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | | 6,092 | | | 19,766 | | | 3,243 | | | 43 | | | — | | | 29,144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alp E. Can | | 17,100 | | | 49,951 | | | 1,043 | | | 689 | | | — | | | 68,783 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Robert S. Kovach | | 5,861 | | | 20,513 | | | 906 | | | 474 | | | — | | | 27,754 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | 8,515 | | | 26,398 | | | 3,637 | | | 646 | | | 82,789 | | | 121,985 | |
____________
(1) Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid by the Bank, and, with the exception of Mr. McMullan, the value of total perquisites for each named executive officer was less than $25,000. The Bank provided Mr. McMullan an $18,000 car allowance, $3,000 in matching contributions to the Bank’s Once For All charitable giving program and a $5,247 reimbursement for financial planning services. The remainder of perquisites for Mr. McMullan are attributable to the Bank’s payment of guest travel to certain business functions, certain activities at business functions and premiums for the Bank’s Business Travel Accident and Death and Dismemberment Policy. The Bank paid premiums for each named executive officer for the Bank’s Business Travel Accidental Death and Dismemberment Policy. The Bank provided Mr. Malmberg, Mr. O’Shields and Mr. Can matching contributions in the Bank’s Once For All charitable giving program. The Bank provided Mr. Kovach reimbursement for guest travel to certain business functions.
(2) The tax gross-up amounts represent withholding taxes on the $100 employee appreciation bonus provided to all employees of the Bank and on the awards to Messrs. Can, Kovach, and Malmberg issued under the Bank’s Service Award Program.
(3) This amount represents an annual leave cash-out payment to Mr. Malmberg upon his retirement.
AwardsReport of Incentive Compensation in 2020the Board of Directors
The following table provides information concerning each grantboard of an award to a named executive officerdirectors of the Bank has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above with management, and based on such review and discussion, the board of directors has determined that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above should be included in 2020 under the ICP.Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2020 GrantsThe board of Plan-Based Awards
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Name
(a) | | Threshold
(b) (1) | | Target
(c) (1) | | Maximum
(d) (1) |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | $ | 475,000 | | | $ | 712,500 | | | $ | 950,000 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 141,750 | | | 243,000 | | | 344,250 | |
| Reginald O'Shields | | 145,250 | | | 249,000 | | | 352,750 | |
| Alp E. Can | | 145,250 | | | 249,000 | | | 352,750 | |
| Robert S. Kovach | | 126,990 | | | 211,650 | | | 296,310 | |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | 215,250 | | | 369,000 | | | 522,750 | |
____________
(1) Columns (b-d) reflect threshold, target,directors of the Bank has primary responsibility for establishing and maximum payment opportunities underdetermining the Bank’s ICP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The actual amounts earned pursuant to the ICPcompensation program. Therefore, this report is submitted by all current directors who were serving during 2020 are reported under column (e) of the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. Fifty percent of the actual amount earned is subject to mandatory deferral. For information on these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”2022.
Retirement Benefits
The named executive officers are eligible to participate in certain tax-qualified and non-qualified defined benefit, defined contribution, and deferred compensation plans. These plans are described in more detail below in the sections entitled “Executive Compensation — Pension Benefits” and “— Deferred Compensation.”
The Bank’s retirement benefit plans are a vital component of the Bank’s retention strategy for executive officers, particularly because many other competing organizations provide executive officers with economic benefits based on equity interests in the employer, oftentimes in addition to similar retirement benefits. The Bank is unable to offer equity-related compensation because it is a cooperative, and only member financial institutions may own its capital stock.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
All named executive officers are eligible to participate in the benefit plans that are made available to all employees of the Bank including medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage, group term life and long-term disability insurance coverage, paid vacation, and sick leave. The named executive officers generally participate in these plans on the same basis and terms as all other employees.
The Bank offers the named executive officers a limited number of perquisites, including an annual physical examination, guest travel to certain business functions, business club memberships, and financial planning services. For Mr. Malmberg, the Bank also provides an automobile allowance of up to $1,500 per month. Because perquisites generally are limited, the board does not specifically consider perquisites when reviewing total compensation for any of the named executive officers.
Employment Arrangements and Severance Benefits
Other than the specific contractual arrangements discussed below, all Bank employees are employed under an “at will” arrangement. Accordingly, an employee may resign employment at any time, and the Bank may terminate the employee’s employment at any time for any reason, with or without cause.
The board of directors may, in its discretion, provide severance benefits to an executive officer in the event of termination of his/her employment. In determining whether severance compensation is appropriate, the board of directors considers both the factors underlying the termination of employment and the employment history of the executive officer. The Bank does not provide a “gross up” benefit on taxes incurred with respect to any severance.
Employment Agreement. The Bank entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Malmberg, effective April 20, 2021 (Employment Agreement). Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Malmberg’s employment with the Bank may be terminated by the Bank with or without “cause,” or by Mr. Malmberg with or without “good reason,” as defined in the Employment Agreement. Unless earlier terminated by either party as provided therein, the Employment Agreement has an initial three-year term and will continue to extend automatically for subsequent one-year periods unless either party elects not to renew. Mr. Malmberg is entitled to participate in all incentive, savings, and retirement plans and programs available to senior executives of the Bank. The Employment Agreement also provides for certain severance benefits for Mr. Malmberg separately from those under the Change in Control Severance Plan, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” This severance arrangement was an integral and necessary component of the Bank’s strategy to recruit Mr. Malmberg to the president and CEO position.
Change in Control Severance Plan. Effective January 1, 2017, the Bank adopted an Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (Severance Plan). The purpose of the Severance Plan is to facilitate the hiring and retention of senior executives capable of executing the Bank’s strategic priorities, to ensure their continued dedication to the Bank notwithstanding the possibility of a change in control, and to provide them with certain protection and benefits in the event of certain termination events following a defined change in control of the Bank. The board has designated Messrs. Malmberg, Kazazian, Can and O’Shields as eligible to participate in the Severance Plan. Ms. Hunter became eligible to participate in the Severance Plan as at January 1, 2023. The Severance Plan is discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Report of the Board of Directors
The board of directors of the Bank has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above with management, and based on such review and discussion, the board of directors has determined that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above should be included in the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The board of directors of the Bank has primary responsibility for establishing and determining the Bank’s compensation program. Therefore, this report is submitted by all current directors who were serving during 2022.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| | | | | | | | |
| R. Thornwell Dunlap, III, Chair | | Suzanne S. DeFerie, Vice Chair |
| Eduardo J. Arriola | | Edwina L. Payne |
| William C. Handorf | | John B. Rucker |
| Scott C. Harvard | | Kim D. Saunders |
| Kim C. Liddell | | James M. Stubbs |
| William L. Lusk, Jr. | | Richard A. Whaley |
| Brian P. McLaughlin | | |
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Tables
The following table presents a summary of cash and other compensation earned by the named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. It is important to read this table, and the other tables that follow, closely and in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The narratives following the tables and the footnotes accompanying each table are important parts of each table.
2022 Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal
Position
(a) | | Year
(b) | | Salary (c) | | Bonus (d) (2) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (e) (3) | | Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (f) (4) | | All Other
Compensation (g) (5) | | Total
(h) |
Kirk R. Malmberg
President and Chief Executive Officer | | 2022 | | $ | 910,000 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 849,961 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 243,870 | | | $ | 2,003,932 | |
| 2021 | | 525,000 | | | 2,100 | | | 429,462 | | | 307,917 | | | 118,330 | | | 1,382,809 | |
| 2020 | | 581,885 | | | 1,500 | | | 427,342 | | | 3,689,157 | | | 121,985 | | | 4,821,869 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | 2022 | | 440,000 | | | 7,100 | | | 355,301 | | | — | | | 30,352 | | | 832,753 | |
| 2021 | | 425,000 | | | 100 | | | 298,917 | | | — | | | 27,725 | | | 751,742 | |
| 2020 | | 420,577 | | | 100 | | | 311,041 | | | 1,820,000 | | | 25,571 | | | 2,577,289 | |
| Alp E. Can, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer | | 2022 | | 470,000 | | | 15,100 | | | 364,965 | | | — | | | 111,031 | | | 961,096 | |
| 2021 | | 425,000 | | | 100 | | | 312,010 | | | 19,000 | | | 79,691 | | | 835,801 | |
| 2020 | | 430,962 | | | 1,600 | | | 320,814 | | | 301,000 | | | 68,783 | | | 1,123,159 | |
K. Annette Hunter Senior Vice President and Director of Business Operations (1) | | 2022 | | 358,938 | | | 2,100 | | | 239,219 | | | — | | | 23,863 | | | 624,120 | |
| 2021 | | 346,800 | | | 32,060 | | | 182,066 | | | 50,000 | | | 21,894 | | | 632,820 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reginald O'Shields Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Compliance Officer | | 2022 | | 440,000 | | | 100 | | | 355,126 | | | — | | | 32,182 | | | 827,408 | |
| 2021 | | 425,000 | | | 100 | | | 291,401 | | | — | | | 29,743 | | | 746,244 | |
| 2020 | | 430,962 | | | 100 | | | 303,934 | | | 1,200,000 | | | 29,144 | | | 1,964,140 | |
__________
(1) Ms. Hunter was promoted to Executive Vice President and Director of Business Operations, effective as of January 1, 2023.
(2) The amounts in column (d) reflect an annual $100 employee appreciation bonus provided to all employees of the Bank. The Bank provides all employees of the Bank, including the named executive officers, a tax gross-up on this bonus, which amount is included in column (g). The 2022 bonus amount includes an award payment of $2,000 for Mr. Kazazian under the Bank’s Service Award Program to recognize employees with five or more years of service and a $5,000 performance bonus. Mr. Can received a performance bonus of $15,000. Ms. Hunter received an award payment of $2,000 under the Bank’s Service Award Program to recognize employees with five or more years of service.
(3) The amounts in column (e) reflect the dollar value of all earnings for services performed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 pursuant to awards under the ICP, even though fifty percent of the ICP awards for each year were subject to mandatory deferral and distribution over three years. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, payment of the 2022 non-equity incentive compensation awards was subject to a 30-day review period and receipt of non-objection by the Finance Agency. The Bank received written non-objection from the Finance Agency on February 14, 2023. The amounts in column (e) also include the dollar value of all interest during each year earned on Deferred Incentive related to ICP awards for prior fiscal years, in the following amounts for 2022: $6,825 for Mr. Malmberg, $9,158 for Mr. Kazazian, $9,547 for Mr. Can, $6,143 for Ms. Hunter, and $8,983 for Mr. O’Shields.
(4) The amounts in column (f) reflect the sum of (i) the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the named executive officer’s aggregate pension benefits under the Bank’s Pension and Defined Benefit Equalization Plan (DBEP) during each fiscal year, computed as described in footnote (1) to the 2022 Pension Benefits table, and (ii) all “above market” earnings earned under the Bank’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans. Under SEC rules, “above-market” earnings result when deferrals are credited with interest in excess of 120 percent of the Applicable Federal Rate. The 2022 above-market amount for Mr. Malmberg was $1. For Mr. Malmberg, Mr. Kazazian, Mr. Can , Ms. Hunter, and Mr. O’Shields the aggregate actuarial present value for pension benefits under the Bank’s Pension and DBEP Plans decreased by $257,406, $1,768,000, $422,000, $972,000, and $1,284,000, respectively. These plans are described in greater detail below under “Pension Benefits” and “Deferred Compensation.”
(5) The amounts in column (g) for 2022 consist of the following amounts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Bank Contributions under the 401(k) Plan | | Matching contributions under the Bank’s non-qualified Defined Contribution Benefit Equalization Plan | | Perquisite (1) | | Tax Gross-ups (2) | | Other | | Total |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | $ | 18,300 | | | $ | 206,646 | | | $ | 18,890 | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 243,870 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 18,300 | | | 8,100 | | | 3,019 | | | 933 | | | — | | | 30,352 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | |
| Alp E. Can | | 18,300 | | | 92,642 | | | 44 | | | 45 | | | — | | | 111,031 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | 8,283 | | | 13,253 | | | 1,321 | | | 1,006 | | | — | | | 23,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | | 8,123 | | | 18,277 | | | 5,735 | | | 47 | | | — | | | 32,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
____________
(1) Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid by the Bank, and the value of each perquisite for each executive was less than $25,000. The Bank paid premiums for each named executive officer for the Bank’s Business Travel Accidental Death and Dismemberment Policy. The Bank provided Mr. Malmberg an airline program membership, and a $1,500 per month car allowance. The Bank provided Mr. Kazazian, Ms. Hunter, and Mr. O’Shields reimbursement for certain activities at business functions. The Bank provided Mr. Kazazian and Mr. O’Shields reimbursement for guest travel to certain business functions and an airline program membership. The Bank provided Ms. Hunter, and Mr. O’Shields matching contributions in the Bank’s Once For All charitable giving program.
(2) The tax gross-up amounts represent withholding taxes on the $100 employee appreciation bonus provided to all employees of the
Awards of Incentive Compensation in 2022
The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award to a named executive officer in 2022 under the ICP.
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Name
(a) | | Threshold
(b) (1) | | Target
(c) (1) | | Maximum
(d) (1) |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | $ | 455,000 | | | $ | 682,500 | | | $ | 910,000 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 154,000 | | | 264,000 | | | 374,000 | |
| Alp E. Can | | 164,500 | | | 282,000 | | | 399,500 | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | 107,681 | | | 179,469 | | | 251,257 | |
| Reginald O'Shields | | 154,000 | | | 264,000 | | | 374,000 | |
____________
(1) Columns (b-d) reflect threshold, target, and maximum payment opportunities under the Bank’s ICP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The actual amounts earned pursuant to the ICP during 2022 are reported under column (e) of the 2022 Summary Compensation Table. Fifty percent of the actual amount earned is subject to mandatory deferral. For information on these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Retirement Benefits
Pension Benefits
The 20202022 Pension Benefits table below provides information with respect to the Pentegra Plan, which is the Bank’s tax-qualified pension plan (Pension Plan), and the Bank’s non-qualified Defined Benefit Equalization Plan (DBEP). The table shows the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2020,2022, for each of the named executive officers and the number of years of service credited to each named executive under each plan.
Pension Plan
The pension benefits payable under the Pension Plan are based on a pre-established defined benefit formula that provides for an annual retirement allowance and a retirement death benefit. A participant’s benefit in the plan vests upon completion of five years of service with the Bank, and the participant then may retire underpayout amount depends on the plan atdate of the timesparticipant’s retirement, as described below.
Employees hired before July 1, 2005
For participants hired on or before July 1, 2005, the Pension Plan generally provides an annual retirement allowance equal to 2.50 percent of the participant’s highest consecutive three-year average compensation for each year of credited service under the plan (not to exceed 30 years). Average compensation is defined as base salary and annual short-term incentive compensation.
For these participants, the standard retirement age is 65, with reduced early retirement benefits available at age 45. If the participant continues to work for the Bank until the sum of the participant’s age and years of service with the Bank equals at least 70, the annual benefit payable following retirement is reduced by 1.50 percent for each year that retirement precedes normal retirement age. If the participant terminates employment before the participant’s age and years of service with the Bank total 70, the annual benefit payable following retirement is reduced by six percent for each year between age 64 and 60, by four percent for each year between age 59 and 55, and by three percent for each year between age 54 and 45, in each case, that retirement precedes normal retirement age. For these participants, lump sum payments are available beginning at age 50.
Mr. McMullan, Mr. Kazazian, Mr. Can, and Mr. O’Shields and Ms. Hunter participate in the Pension Plan on these terms because they were hired before July 1, 2005. Each of them has attained eligibility for immediate early retirement. Mr. Malmberg also participatedparticipates in the Pension Plan on these terms and at a level consistent with his original date of hire. (Mr. Malmberg received a distribution from the Pension Plan following his retirement.
retirement in 2020; but he re-entered the Pension Plan when he was appointed CEO in 2021.)
Employees hired between July 1, 2005, and February 28, 2011
For participants hired between July 1, 2005, and February 28, 2011, the Pension Plan generally provides an annual retirement allowance equal to 1.50 percent of the participant’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation for each year of credited service under the plan (not to exceed 30 years). Average compensation is defined as base salary only. For these participants, the standard retirement age is 65, with reduced early retirement benefits available at age 55. If the participant terminates employment before reaching age 65, the annual benefit payable following retirement is reduced by six percent for each year between age 65 and 60, and by four percent for each year between age 60 and 55, in each case, that retirement precedes normal retirement age. For these participants, lump sumage. These payments are not available except for Mr. Kovach. Mr. Kovach, who was hired in 2010, participates in the Pension Plan under these terms, has attained eligibility for immediate early retirement and is eligible to receive a lump sum payment due to his prior service at FHLBank Pittsburgh.named executive officers.
Employees hired on or after March 1, 2011
The Pension Plan was closed to new participants effective March 1, 2011.
DBEP
Payments under the Pension Plan may be limited due to federal tax code limitations. The DBEP exists to restore those benefits that executives otherwise would forfeit due to these limitations. The DBEP operates using the same benefit formula and retirement eligibility provisions as described above under the Pension Plan. Because the DBEP is a non-qualified plan, the benefits received from this plan do not receive the same tax treatment and funding protection as the Pension Plan. Messrs. Kazazian, and O’Shields and Ms. Hunter participate in the DBEP.
All of the named executive officers participate in the DBEP, with the exception of Mr. Can, as a result of the 2018 DBEP amendment described below.
Death Benefits
Death benefits, which do not vary based on date of hire, also are available under the Pension Plan and the DBEP. If an employee dies while in active service, his/her beneficiary is entitled to a lump sum amount equal to the commuted value of 120 monthly retirement payments. If a former employee dies while in retirement, having elected the normal form of retirement benefits, his/her beneficiary also is entitled to a lump sum amount equal to the commuted value of 120 monthly retirement payments less payments received before the former employee died.
20202022 Pension Benefits
| Name
(a) | Name
(a) | | Plan Name
(b) | | Number of Years of
Credited Service
(c) | | Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (d) (1) | | Payments during last fiscal year
(e) | Name
(a) | | Plan Name
(b) | | Number of Years of
Credited Service
(c) | | Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (d) (1) | | Payments during last fiscal year
(e) |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | Pension Plan | | 30.00 | | $ | 2,657,000 | | | $ | — | | |
Kirk R. Malmberg (2) | | Kirk R. Malmberg (2) | | Pension Plan | | 25.58 | | $ | 2,316,000 | | | $ | 154,594 | |
| | DBEP | | 30.00 | | 17,838,000 | | | — | | | DBEP | | N/A | | — | | | — | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | Haig H. Kazazian, III | | Pension Plan | | 28.25 | | 2,514,000 | | | — | | Haig H. Kazazian, III | | Pension Plan | | 30.00 | | 1,976,000 | | | — | |
| | DBEP | | 28.28 | | 4,014,000 | | | — | | | DBEP | | 30.00 | | 2,658,000 | | | — | |
| Alp E. Can | | Alp E. Can | | Pension Plan | | 17.58 | | 705,000 | | | — | |
| | | DBEP | | N/A | | — | | | — | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | K. Annette Hunter | | Pension Plan | | 20.25 | | 1,435,000 | | | — | |
| | | DBEP | | 20.25 | | 1,312,000 | | | — | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | Reginald T. O'Shields | | Pension Plan | | 17.58 | | 1,395,000 | | | — | | Reginald T. O'Shields | | Pension Plan | | 19.58 | | 979,000 | | | — | |
| | DBEP | | 17.58 | | 2,395,000 | | | — | | | DBEP | | 19.58 | | 1,363,000 | | | — | |
| Alp E. Can | | Pension Plan | | 15.58 | | 1,108,000 | | | — | | |
| | — | | — | | | — | | |
Robert S. Kovach | | Pension Plan | | 30.00 | | 1,999,000 | | | — | | |
| | DBEP | | 30.00 | | 621,000 | | | — | | |
Kirk R. Malmberg (2) | | Pension Plan | | 23.92 | | 2,380,000 | | | — | | |
| | DBEP | | 23.92 | | 8,571,000 | | | — | | |
|
____________
(1) The “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” is the present value of the annual pension benefit that was earned as of December 31, 2020,2022, assuming retirement at age 65. Benefits under the Pension Plan were calculated using a 2.525.02 percent discount rate; a 1.264.93 percent discount rate was used to calculate benefits under the DBEP.
(2) In accordance with plan provisions, the years of credited service for Mr. Malmberg include 4.0 years credited for prior service earned while employed by FHLBank Chicago. The incremental value of this prior service, as valueddid not re-enter participation in the Bank’s DBEP using the methodology describedupon his appointment as CEO in note 1, is $1,441,000.2021.
Deferred Compensation
Each named executive officer of the Bank is eligible to participate in the Bank’s non-qualified, elective deferred compensation plan (DCP). Additionally, each named executive officer is also eligible to participate in the Bank’s consolidated non-qualified Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP). The BEP includes both a defined contribution component (DCBEP) described below and a defined benefit component (DBEP) described above. Directors are eligible to participate in the DCP but are not eligible to participate in the BEP.
The DCP permits a participant to defer all or a portion of his/her compensation, including base salary and awards under the ICP, and to select the method of determining the earnings on such deferred compensation, based on a range of mutual fund options designed to mirror the Bank’s 401(k) Plan. DCP participants also may select an interest crediting rate based on the Bank’s return on equity. Distributions from the DCP may be made either in a specific year, whether or not a participant’s employment has ended, or at a time that begins at or after the participant’s retirement or separation. Participants may elect to receive either a lump sum distribution or annual installment payments over periods ranging from two to five years. The Bank does not match contributions to the DCP. Mr. McMullan participated in the DCP for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Named executive officers are permitted to defer up to 40.0 percent of salary under the Bank’s 401(k) Plan and the DCBEP. The Bank matches the amount contributed by a participant up to six percent of base salary.
The DCBEP, like the 401(k) Plan, is self-directed and provides participants with a range of mutual fund options through the Vanguard Group. Participants earn a market rate of return based on the mutual funds selected. Distributions from the DCBEP
begin when a participant’s employment has ended. Participants may elect to receive either a lump sum distribution or annual installment payments over periods ranging from two to five years. These plans are designed to encourage additional voluntary savings and to offer a valuable financial planning tool. All Bank contributions to the DCBEP are subject to a two-year vesting period.
The board amended the BEP, effective January 1, 2018, to:
•provide that any executive hired or promoted to the level of senior vice president or higher after January 1, 2018 (“eligible executives”), will not be eligible to receive the defined benefit feature of the BEP;
•provide senior vice presidents hired or promoted after January 1, 2018 with a contribution equivalent to 10.0 percent of base pay offset by contributions to the 401(k) Plan; and
•provide senior vice presidents hired or promoted after January 1, 2018 with a contribution equivalent to 10.0 percent of incentive compensation.
The board amended the BEP, effective JanuaryApril 1, 2020,2021, to:
•provide that certain components in the formula used to calculate final benefits payable to the CEO under the BEP will be fixed, including applicable discount rates, mortality tables and final average pay, thereby mitigating expense volatility to the Bank and enhancing CEO retention
•provide for benefits under the defined contribution portiondefine a new category of the BEP for executives as eligible participants: those who were hired or promoted to the level ofchief executive vice president or higherofficer on or after JanuaryApril 1, 2017 who are accruing benefits under2021 and regardless of participation in the Bank’s qualified pension plan but who are not eligible to accrue benefits under the Bank’sBank's non-qualified defined benefitsbenefit equalization plan.The defined contribution portion of the BEP as amended:plan;
◦
•providesprovide eligible executives with a contribution equivalent to 12.014.0 percent of base pay offset by 6.0 percent matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan; and
◦
•providesprovide eligible executives with a contribution equivalent to 12.020.0 percent of incentive compensation.any bonuses paid in the current year.
The board further amended the BEP, effective July 2, 2022 to:
•define a new category of executives as eligible participants: those who occupy the chief risk officer role as of July, 2022 and regardless of participation in the Bank’s qualified pension plan but who are not eligible to accrue benefits under the Bank's non-qualified defined benefit equalization plan;
The following table presents compensation earned and deferred in 2020,2022, and earnings on, or distributions of, such amounts. In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown in the table do not include any amounts in respect of the 401(k) Plan.
2020
2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
(a) | | | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year
(b) (1) | | Bank
Contributions in Last Fiscal Year
(c) (2) | | Aggregate Earnings
In Last Fiscal Year
(d) (3) | | Aggregate
Withdrawals / Distributions
(e) | | Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal Year End
(f) (4) |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | | $ | 27,600 | | | $ | 206,646 | | | $ | (99,412) | | | $ | (463,497) | | | $ | 467,436 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | | — | | | 8,100 | | | (14,235) | | | — | | | 67,676 | |
| Alp E. Can | | | 7,700 | | | 92,642 | | | (52,586) | | | — | | | 289,637 | |
| K. Annette Hunter | | | 44,788 | | | 13,253 | | | (68,504) | | | — | | | 393,382 | |
| Reginald O'Shields | | | 61,000 | | | 18,277 | | | (254,909) | | | — | | | 928,187 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
(a) | | | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year
(b) (1) | | Bank
Contributions in Last Fiscal Year
(c) (2) | | Aggregate Earnings
In Last Fiscal Year
(d) (3) | | Aggregate
Withdrawals / Distributions
(e) | | Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal Year End
(f) (4) |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | | $ | 215,302 | | | $ | 43,423 | | | $ | 117,092 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,548,895 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | | — | | | 8,135 | | | 9,825 | | | — | | | 54,302 | |
| Reginald O'Shields | | | 66,692 | | | 19,765 | | | 195,863 | | | — | | | 899,850 | |
| Alp E. Can | | | 6,358 | | | 49,951 | | | 20,458 | | | — | | | 131,869 | |
| Robert S. Kovach | | | 105,874 | | | 20,514 | | | 233,883 | | | — | | | 1,996,828 | |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | | 90,377 | | | 26,397 | | | 443,856 | | | — | | | 2,391,151 | |
_____________________
(1) Amounts under column (b), if any, are included in salary reported for 20202022 in column (c) of the 20202022 Summary Compensation Table.
(2) Amounts under column (c), if any, are included in all other compensation amounts reported for 20202022 in column (g) of the 20202022 Summary Compensation Table.
(3) Amounts under column (d), if any, reflect actual market returns for mutual funds selected by participants and interest credit received underearnings on the Bank’s core economic income return on equity interest creditingfund over 120% applicable long term federal rate.
(4) To the extent that a participant was a named executive officer in prior years, executive and Bank contributions included in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column have been reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
McMullanMalmberg Employment Agreement
Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s Employment Agreement provides that upon the Bank’s termination of his employment for any reason other than “cause,” or upon Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s termination of his employment for “good reason,” the Bank will pay a total of one year’s base salary in effect at the date of termination in a lump sum within 30 days after Mr. McMullanMalmberg executes and delivers a general release of claims to the Bank, plus an amount equal to the amount that would have been payable pursuant to Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s incentive compensation award for the year in which the date of termination occurs, prorated based upon the number of days Mr. McMullanMalmberg was employed that year. The incentive compensation award is based on the Bank’s actual performance for the year in which termination occurs and is payable at the time such incentive compensation awards are paid to other senior executives. In addition, Mr. McMullanMalmberg is entitled to receive certain healthcare replacement costs and other amounts required to be paid or provided under any other Bank plan, program, policy or practice or contract or agreement.
Under Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s Employment Agreement, “cause” is defined to include include:
•Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s failure to perform substantially his duties;
•his engagement in illegal conduct or gross misconduct injurious to the Bank;
•a written request from the Finance Agency or any other regulatory agency or body requesting that the Bank terminate his employment;
•crimes involving a felony, fraud or other dishonest acts;
•certain other notices from or actions by the Finance Agency;
•his breach of fiduciary duty or breach of certain covenants in the Employment Agreement;
•his refusal to comply with a lawful directive from the ChairmanChair of the board of directors or from the board of directors; or
•his material breach of the Employment Agreement.
The Employment Agreement defines “good reason” to include include:
•a material diminution in Mr. McMullan’sMalmberg’s base salary or in his authority;
•the Bank requiring Mr. McMullanMalmberg to be based at any office or location other than in Atlanta, Georgia; or
•a material breach of the Employment Agreement by the Bank.
The following table presents information about potential payments to Mr. McMullanMalmberg under his Employment Agreement in the event his employment had terminated on December 31, 20202022 and a change in control of the Bank had not occurred. He is not entitled to any gross-up payments on taxes incurred with respect to any severance, whether under Section 280G of the tax code or otherwise.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Potential Payments upon Termination |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Termination | | Severance | | Medical, Dental, and Vision Insurance Benefits | | Pension Benefit Enhancements | | Other Perquisites | | Total |
| 2020 ICP Award | | Deferred Incentive for Prior Periods (1) | | Salary |
| Resignation without Good Reason | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Involuntary Termination For Cause | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Involuntary Termination Without Cause | | 816,403 | | | 855,103 | | | 950,000 | | | 38,619 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,660,125 | |
| Resignation For Good Reason | | 816,403 | | | 855,103 | | | 950,000 | | | 38,619 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,660,125 | |
____________
(1) Mr. McMullan has reached a combination of age and years of service to the Bank totaling at least 70. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Potential Payments upon Termination |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Termination | | Severance | | Medical, Dental, and Vision Insurance Benefits | | Pension Benefit Enhancements | | Other Perquisites | | Total |
| 2022 ICP Award | | Deferred Incentive for Prior Periods | | Salary |
| Resignation without Good Reason | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Involuntary Termination For Cause | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Involuntary Termination Without Cause | | 843,136 | | | 73,852 | | | 910,000 | | | 47,688 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,874,676 | |
| Resignation For Good Reason | | 843,136 | | | 73,852 | | | 910,000 | | | 47,688 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,874,676 | |
The other named executive officers are entitled to receive amounts earned during their terms of employment, regardless of the manner in which their employment terminated, on the same terms generally applicable to all employees of the Bank. These amounts include:
•Severance, if and as determined at the sole discretion of the board.
•Amounts accrued and vested through the Bank’s Pension Plan and the DBEP (the Bank’s qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans).
•Up to three months of incremental service under the Bank’s Pension Plan may be granted, in the sole discretion of the board, if an employee is provided with severance pay.
•Amounts accrued and vested through the 401(k) Plan and the DCBEP (the Bank’s qualified and non-qualified defined contribution plans) and amounts contributed and associated earnings under the Bank’s DCP.
•Accrued vacation and applicable retiree medical benefits and applicable retiree life insurance.
In the event of the death or disability of an employee, including a named executive officer, in conjunction with the benefits above, the employee or his/her beneficiary may receive benefits under the Bank’s disability plan or payments under the Bank’s life insurance plan, as appropriate. Named executive officers also are entitled to receive death benefit payments under the Pension Plan and the Excess Plan, as described under “Retirement Benefits—Death Benefits.”
Mr. Malmberg did not receive any severance payment or severance related crediting of incremental service under the Bank’s Pension Plan in connection with his retirement in November 2020.
Change in Control Severance Plan
Effective January 1, 2017, the Bank adopted an Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (Severance Plan).
Overview of the Severance Plan
The Severance Plan provides certain protection and benefits in the event of a Qualifying Termination (as defined below) following a Change in Control (as defined below). The Severance Plan applies to employees or officers who are designated by the Bank’s board of directors as participants. The Bank’s board has designated Messrs. McMullan, Malmberg, Kazazian, Can, O’Shields and O’ShieldsMs. Hunter as participants in the Severance Plan.
Qualifying Termination
“Qualifying Termination” means any separation, termination or other discontinuation of the employment relationship between the Bank and a participant, (A) by the Bank, other than for “cause” (as defined in the Severance Plan); or (B) by the participant, for “good reason” (as defined in the Severance Plan), but does not include a termination resulting from the participant’s death or disability.
The Severance Plan defines “cause” to include:
•the participant’s failure to perform substantially his/her duties;
•the participant’s engagement in illegal conduct or willful misconduct injurious to the Bank;
•the participant’s material violation of law or regulation or of the Bank’s written policies or guidelines;
•a written request from the Finance Agency requesting that the Bank terminate the participant’s employment;
•crimes involving a felony, fraud or other dishonest acts;
•certain other notices from or actions by the Finance Agency;
•the participant’s breach of fiduciary duty or breach of certain covenants in the Severance Plan; and
•the participant’s refusal to comply with a lawful directive from the CEO or the board of directors.
The Severance Plan defines “good reason” to include:
•a material diminution in the participant’s base salary or in his/her duties or authority;
•the Bank requiring the participant to be based at any office or location other than in Atlanta, Georgia; or
•a material breach of the Severance Plan by the Bank.
Under the terms of the Severance Plan, if there is a Qualifying Termination during the period beginning on the earliest of the date a definitive agreement or order for a Change in Control has been entered, or the effective date of a Change of Control as prescribed by the Finance Agency, and ending, in all cases, twenty-four (24) months following the effective date of the Change in Control, the participant becomes entitled to certain severance payments and benefits.
These payments and benefits include the following:
•The CEO would receive a cash payment equal to 2.5 times his/her annual base salary amount.
•An executive vice president would receive a cash payment equal to 1.75 times his/her annual base salary amount.
•Participants would receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the amount that would have been payable pursuant to the participant’s incentive compensation award for the year in which the date of a Qualifying Termination occurs, prorated based on the number of days the participant was employed that year.
•Participants would receive a lump sum cash payment for outplacement assistance in the amount of $7,500.
In addition, the CEO would receive a cash payment equivalent to 24 months of health continuation coverage, and executive vice presidents would receive a cash payment equivalent to 18 months of health continuation coverage.
The Severance Plan defines a “Change in Control” as:
•the merger, reorganization, or consolidation of the Bank with or into, or acquisition of the Bank by, another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity;
•the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Bank to another Federal Home Loan Bank or other entity; or
•a change in the composition of the Bank’s board that causes the combined number of member directors from the jurisdictions of Alabama, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia to cease to constitute a majority of the Bank’s directors; or
•the Bank’s liquidation or dissolution.
The payments described above are payable in a lump sum within sixty (60) days following the participant’s employment termination date, except the prorated incentive compensation award, which is payable at the time such incentive compensation awards are paid to other senior executives. All payments and benefits are conditioned on the executive having delivered an irrevocable general release of claims against the Bank before payment occurs. In addition, all payments and benefits remain subject to the Bank’s compliance with any applicable statutory and regulatory requirements relating to the payment of amounts under the Severance Plan. The Severance Plan requires that an individual execute a participation agreement to become a participant in the Severance Plan. Each of Messrs. McMullanMalmberg, Kazazian, Can, O’Shields, and MalmbergMs. Hunter have executed a participation agreement to become participants in the Severance Plan, effective January 1, 2017. Messrs. O’Shields and Can executed a participation agreement to become participants in the Severance Plan effective July 30, 2020.Plan.
The following table presents information about potential payments to Messrs. McMullan, Can and O’Shields under the Severance Plan in the event that a Change in Control had occurred and their employment had terminated due to a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2020.2022. None of Messrs. McMullan, Can or O’Shieldsthe participants would be entitled to any gross-up payments on taxes incurred with respect to any severance, whether under Section 280G of the tax code or otherwise. Mr. Malmberg’s retirement on November 30, 2020would not have constituted a Qualifying Termination under the Severance Plan.
| Potential Payments upon Qualified Termination Following a Change in Control(1) | Potential Payments upon Qualified Termination Following a Change in Control(1) | Potential Payments upon Qualified Termination Following a Change in Control(1) |
| | | 2020 ICP Award | | Separation Payment | | Medical, Dental, and Vision Insurance Benefits | | Outplacement Assistance | | Total | | 2022 ICP Award | | Separation Payment | | Medical, Dental, and Vision Insurance Benefits | | Outplacement Assistance | | Total |
| W. Wesley McMullan | | $ | 816,403 | | | $ | 2,375,000 | | | $ | 38,619 | | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 3,237,522 | | |
| Kirk R. Malmberg | | Kirk R. Malmberg | | $ | 843,136 | | | $ | 2,275,000 | | | $ | 47,688 | | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 3,173,324 | |
| Haig H. Kazazian, III | | Haig H. Kazazian, III | | 346,143 | | | 770,000 | | | 48,584 | | | 7,500 | | | 1,172,227 | |
| Alp E. Can | | Alp E. Can | | 355,418 | | | 875,000 | | | 15,751 | | | 7,500 | | | 1,253,669 | |
| Reginald T. O'Shields | Reginald T. O'Shields | | 294,390 | | | 726,250 | | | 41,438 | | | 7,500 | | | 1,069,578 | | Reginald T. O'Shields | | 346,143 | | | 770,000 | | | 48,484 | | | 7,500 | | | 1,172,127 | |
| Alp E. Can | | 313,242 | | | 726,250 | | | 13,430 | | | 7,500 | | | 1,060,422 | | |
____________
(1) Qualifying Termination means a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason. In order to receive severance under the Severance Plan, a Qualifying Termination must occur within 24 months following the effective date of a Change in Control. Mr. Kazazian became a participant in the Severance Plan effective January 14, 2022 and Ms. Hunter was not a participant in the Severance Plan in 2022, but became a participant effective January 1, 2023.
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule
The following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of the Bank’s president and CEO, Mr. McMullan,Malmberg, to the median of the annual total compensation of the Bank’s other employees. The Bank identified the median employee in 20192022 by examining the 20192022 base pay for all 314317 individuals, excluding the CEO, who were employed by the Bank on December 1, 20192022 (annualized for any permanent full- or part-time employees that were not employed by the Bank for all of 2019)2022). For 2020, the Bank determined to use the same median employee in its pay ratio calculation because there has not been a change in the Bank’s employee population or employee compensation arrangements that it believes would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure.The Bank calculated the annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology the Bank uses for its named executive officers as set forth in the 20202022 Summary Compensation Table included earlier in this Executive Compensation section of the Report.For the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, the Bank’s median employee total annual compensation was $234,761,$156,926, the CEO’s total annual compensation was $5,890,898;$2,003,932; and the ratio of CEO to median employee compensation was 25.112.77 to 1.
Under the SEC’s rules and guidance, there are numerous ways to determine the median employee for purposes of calculating the pay ratio, and companies may differ in the methods they use, including the employee population sampled, the elements of pay and benefits used, any assumptions made and the use of statistical sampling. In addition, no two companies have identical employee populations or compensation programs, and pay, benefits and retirement plans differ by country even within the same company. As such, the Bank’s pay ratio may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.
Director Compensation
The FHLBank Act provides that each FHLBank may pay its directors reasonable compensation for the time required of them, and their necessary expenses, in the performance of their duties, subject to approval by the Director. In accordance with the FHLBank Act, the Bank has adopted a policy governing the compensation and travel expense reimbursement provided to its directors. Under this policy, directors receive fees paid for attendance at each meeting of the board of directors and meeting of a committee of the board of directors, as further described below. These fees are subject to the annual caps established under the policy. Directors do not receive separate retainers.
Directors are reimbursed for reasonable Bank-related travel expenses in accordance with Bank policy. In specified instances, the Bank may reimburse a director for the transportation and other ordinary travel expenses of the director’s guest; in 2020,2022, these expenses totaled $9,340$48,644 in the aggregate.
During 2020,2022, directors received fees for attendance at each board and committee meeting as described below. The following table presents the annual compensation limits applied.
20202022 Annual Director Compensation Limits
| | | | | | | | |
| Title | | Amount |
ChairmanChair of the Board | | $ | 140,000 | |
Vice ChairmanChair of the Board | | 120,000 | |
ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee | | 115,000 | |
Other Committee ChairmenChair (excluding Audit and Executive) | | 110,000 | |
| All Other Directors | | 100,000 | |
Under the 20202022 Directors’ Compensation Policy, each director had an opportunity to receive a payment of approximately one-seventh of that director’s annual cap for attendance at no less than 75.0 percent of the board meeting and meetings of each committee of the board on which the director serves during each interim period. The first interim period began on December 10, 201913, 2021 and ended January 31, 202028, 2022 (the last day of the first scheduled in-person board meeting for 2020)2022). Each successive interim period began on the calendar day immediately following a scheduled board meeting through and including the day of the next scheduled board meeting, with the seventh interim period ending on December 13, 202011, 2022 after the seventh scheduled in-person board meeting. Under the policy, after the end of the seventh interim period and before the seventh payment was made, the governance and compensation committee of the board reviewedreviews the cumulative attendance and performance of each director during 2020the year and, in consultation with the chair of the board, may recommended to the board a reduction, elimination or increase in the final payment opportunity for each director. Nodirector, provided that no increase couldmay exceed the applicable annual compensation cap. No such adjustment was made for 2022.
The following table presents the cash and other compensation earned or paid by the Bank to the members of the board of directors for all services in all capacities during 2020.2022.
| | 2020 Director Compensation | |
| 2022 Director Compensation | | 2022 Director Compensation |
Name
| Name
| | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | | All Other Compensation | | Total
| Name
| | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | | All Other Compensation | | Total
|
| (a) | (a) | | (b) | | (c) (1) | | (d) | | (e) | (a) | | (b) | | (c) (1) | | (d) | | (e) |
| Richard A. Whaley | | 140,000 | | | 5,031 | | | * | | $ | 145,031 | | |
| Brian E. Argrett | | 110,000 | | | 2,161 | | | * | | 112,161 | | |
| Travis Cosby, III | | 115,000 | | | — | | | * | | 115,000 | | |
| Eduardo Arriola | | Eduardo Arriola | | $ | 85,714 | | | $ | 7 | | | * | | $ | 85,721 | |
| Suzanne S. DeFerie | Suzanne S. DeFerie | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | | Suzanne S. DeFerie | | 115,000 | | | — | | | * | | 115,000 | |
| R. Thornwell Dunlap, III | R. Thornwell Dunlap, III | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | | R. Thornwell Dunlap, III | | 120,000 | | | 44 | | | * | | 120,044 | |
| F. Gary Garczynski | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | |
| William C. Handorf | William C. Handorf | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | William C. Handorf | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | |
| Scott C. Harvard | Scott C. Harvard | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | Scott C. Harvard | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | |
| Jonathan Kislak | Jonathan Kislak | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | Jonathan Kislak | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | |
| LaSalle D. Leffall III | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | |
| Kim C. Liddell | Kim C. Liddell | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | | Kim C. Liddell | | 110,000 | | | — | | | * | | 110,000 | |
| Garrett S. Richter | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | | |
| William L. Lusk, Jr | | William L. Lusk, Jr | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | |
| Brian P. McLaughlin | | Brian P. McLaughlin | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | |
| Edwina L. Payne | | Edwina L. Payne | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | |
| John B. Rucker | John B. Rucker | | 110,000 | | | 8,586 | | | * | | 118,586 | | John B. Rucker | | 110,000 | | | 321 | | | * | | 110,321 | |
| Robert L. Strickland, Jr. | | 120,000 | | | — | | | * | | 120,000 | | |
| Kim D. Saunders | | Kim D. Saunders | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | |
| James M. Stubbs | | James M. Stubbs | | 100,000 | | | — | | | * | | 100,000 | |
| Richard A. Whaley | | Richard A. Whaley | | 140,000 | | | 845 | | | * | | 140,845 | |
____________
(1) Directors are eligible to participate in the Bank’s DCP. Directors Argrett, Rucker,Arriola, Dunlap and Whaley elected to defer compensation for 2020.2022. The amounts in column (c) represent “above market” earnings.earnings on deferred amounts.
* Director perquisites include premiums paid by the Bank for each director for the Bank’s Business Travel Accidental Death and Dismemberment Policy, guest travel, certain activities at business functions, and matching contributions under the Bank’s Once For All charitable giving program. For each director, the aggregate amount of such perquisites was less than $10,000.
In September 2020,January 2023, the board of directors approved the 20212023 Directors’ Compensation Policy which is similar to the 2020 policy, with the samedetermined new annual compensation limits applicable as the 2020 policy.of January 1, 2023.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The Bank is a cooperative whose members own substantially all of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank and elect the directors of the Bank. The voting right of members is generally limited to the election of the Bank’s board of directors. A member is eligible to vote for the number of open member director seats in the state in which its principal place of business is located, and all members are eligible to vote for the number of open independent director seats. Membership is voluntary, and a member must give notice of its intent to withdraw from membership. A member that withdraws from membership may not acquire shares of any FHLBank before the end of the five-year period beginning on the date of the completion of its divestiture of Bank stock.
The Bank does not offer any compensation plan under which equity securities of the Bank are authorized for issuance. The following table presents the ownership of the Bank’s capital stock, which is concentrated within the financial services industry and is stratified across various institution types (in millions).
| | | Commercial
Banks | | Credit
Unions | | Savings Institutions | | Insurance
Companies | | CDFIs | | Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock | | Total | | Commercial
Banks | | Credit
Unions | | Savings Institutions | | Insurance
Companies | | CDFIs | | Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock | | Total |
| December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2022 | $ | 3,395 | | | $ | 1,114 | | | $ | 433 | | | $ | 452 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,397 | |
| December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2021 | 1,094 | | | 704 | | | 317 | | | 265 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 2,384 | |
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,585 | | | $ | 846 | | | $ | 392 | | | $ | 250 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,078 | | December 31, 2020 | 1,585 | | | 846 | | | 392 | | | 250 | | | 5 | | | — | | | 3,078 | |
| December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2019 | 3,257 | | | 1,048 | | | 470 | | | 209 | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | 4,989 | | December 31, 2019 | 3,257 | | | 1,048 | | | 470 | | | 209 | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | 4,989 | |
| December 31, 2018 | December 31, 2018 | 3,656 | | | 1,167 | | | 469 | | | 191 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 5,487 | | December 31, 2018 | 3,656 | | | 1,167 | | | 469 | | | 191 | | | 3 | | | 1 | | | 5,487 | |
| December 31, 2017 | 3,346 | | | 1,233 | | | 445 | | | 128 | | | 2 | | | 1 | | | 5,155 | | |
| December 31, 2016 | 3,393 | | | 1,100 | | | 366 | | | 94 | | | 2 | | | 1 | | | 4,956 | | |
The following table presents information about those members that are beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of February 28, 2021.2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Address | | Number of Shares Owned | | Percent of
Total Capital Stock |
| TIAA, FSB | | 3,467,550 | | | 11.39 | |
| 501 Riverside Avenue - 12th Floor | | | | |
| Jacksonville, FL 32202 | | | | |
| Bank of America, National Association | | 3,340,663 | | | 10.97 | |
| 100 North Tryon Street | | | | |
| Charlotte, NC 28255 | | | | |
| Navy Federal Credit Union | | 2,910,375 | | | 9.56 | |
| 820 Follin Lane | | | | |
| Vienna, VA 22180 | | | | |
| Pentagon Federal Credit Union | | 1,767,124 | | | 5.80 | |
| 7940 Jones Branch Drive | | | | |
| McLean, VA 22102 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Address | | Number of Shares Owned | | Percent of
Total Capital Stock |
| Truist | | 14,685,852 | | | 25.83 | |
| 214 N Tryon Street | | | | |
| Charlotte, NC 28202 | | | | |
| | | | |
| Bank of America, National Association | | 7,491,885 | | | 13.18 | |
| 100 North Tryon Street | | | | |
| | | | |
| Charlotte, NC 28255 | | | | |
| TIAA, FSB | | 2,842,375 | | | 5.00 | |
| 301 West Bay Street | | | | |
| | | | |
| Jacksonville, FL 32202 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Additionally, member directors, which comprise a majority of the board of directors of the Bank, are officers or directors of member institutions that own the Bank’s capital stock. The following table presents these institutions as of February 28, 2021.2023.
| | Member Name | Member Name | | City, State | | Number of Shares Owned | | Percent of Total Capital Stock | Member Name | | City, State | | Number of Shares Owned | | Percent of Total Capital Stock |
| Seacoast National Bank | | Seacoast National Bank | | Stuart, FL | | 179,080 | | | 0.32 | |
| First Bank | First Bank | | Southern Pines, NC | | 58,552 | | | 0.19 | | First Bank | | Southern Pines, NC | | 150,327 | | | 0.26 | |
| First Florida Integrity Bank | | Naples, FL | | 14,185 | | | 0.05 | | |
| River Bank & Trust | | River Bank & Trust | | Prattville, AL | | 52,354 | | | 0.09 | |
| IDB Global Federal Credit Union | | IDB Global Federal Credit Union | | Washington, DC | | 30,178 | | | 0.05 | |
| BayVanguard Bank | BayVanguard Bank | | Baltimore, MD | | 8,549 | | | 0.03 | | BayVanguard Bank | | Baltimore, MD | | 18,268 | | | 0.03 | |
| First Bank | First Bank | | Strasburg, VA | | 8,175 | | | 0.03 | | First Bank | | Strasburg, VA | | 7,956 | | | 0.01 | |
| Citizens Bank of Americus | | Citizens Bank of Americus | | Americus, GA | | 4,439 | | | 0.01 | |
| Community Bankers' Bank | Community Bankers' Bank | | Midlothian, VA | | 7,411 | | | 0.02 | | Community Bankers' Bank | | Midlothian, VA | | 4,185 | | | 0.01 | |
| Citizens Bank of Americus | | Americus, GA | | 6,450 | | | 0.02 | | |
| City First Bank of D.C., National Association | | Washington, DC | | 4,784 | | | 0.02 | | |
| First Community Bank of Central Alabama | | Wetumpka, AL | | 4,402 | | | 0.01 | | |
| Countybank | Countybank | | Greenwood, SC | | 4,317 | | | 0.01 | | Countybank | | Greenwood, SC | | 4,005 | | | 0.01 | |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Because the Bank is a cooperative, capital stock ownership is a prerequisite for a member to transact any business with the Bank. The Bank’s member directors are officers or directors of member institutions. All directors and any member that holds five percent or more of the Bank’s voting securities are classified as related parties under SEC regulations. In the ordinary course of its business, the Bank may transact business with each of the members that has an officer or director serving as a director of the Bank and members that hold five percent or more of the Bank’s voting securities. All such transactions:
•have been made in the ordinary course of the Bank’s business;
•have been made subject to the same Bank policies as transactions with the Bank’s members generally; and
•in the opinion of management, do not involve more than the normal risk of collection or present other unfavorable features.
The Bank has adopted a written related person transaction policy, which requires the Governance and Compensation Committee of the board of directors to review and, if appropriate, to approve certain transactions between the Bank and any related person (as defined by applicable SEC regulations). Pursuant to the policy, the committee will review any transaction the Bank would be required to disclose in filings with the SEC in which the Bank is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had, has, or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The Bank has exemptive relief, pursuant to an SEC no-action letter and by law, from disclosing related person transactions that arise in the ordinary course of the Bank’s business. The committee may approve those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Bank and its shareholders.
In addition, the Bank has a written Code of Conduct applicable to all employees and a Code of Conduct and Ethics for Directors as well as other written policies and procedures that also may apply to or prohibit certain related person transactions.
Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The following table presents the aggregate PwC fees billed to (or accrued) toaccrued by) the Bank by PwC (in thousands).
| | | For the Years Ended December 31, | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Audit fees(1) | Audit fees(1) | $ | 836 | | | $ | 829 | | Audit fees(1) | $ | 964 | | | $ | 869 | |
Audit-related fees(2) | Audit-related fees(2) | 73 | | | 94 | | Audit-related fees(2) | 119 | | | 61 | |
All other fees(3) | All other fees(3) | 3 | | | 3 | | All other fees(3) | 54 | | | 3 | |
| Total fees | Total fees | $ | 912 | | | $ | 926 | | Total fees | $ | 1,137 | | | $ | 933 | |
____________
(1) Audit fees and expenses for the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 20192021 were for professional services rendered by PwC in connection with the Bank’s annual audits and quarterly reviews of the Bank’s financial statements.
(2) Audit-related fees and expenses for the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 20192021 were for certain FHLBank System assurance and related services, certain costsas well as fees related to PwC’s participation at conferences. Audit-related fees for the adoption of newly issued accounting guidance,year ended December 31, 2022 also includes costs related to the Bank’s implementation of a new data warehouse system, as well as fees related to PwC’s participation at conferences.Human Resource and Finance system.
(3) All other fees for the year ended December 31, 20202022 and 20192021 relate to the annual license for PwC’s accounting research software and disclosure checklist. All other fees for the year ended December 31, 2022 also includes fees incurred related to pre-implementation work related to a new Human Resource and Finance system.
The Bank paid additional fees to PwC in the form of assessments paid to the Office of Finance. The Bank is assessed its proportionate share of the costs of operating the Office of Finance, which includes the expenses associated with the annual audits of the combined financial statements of the FHLBanks. These assessments, which totaled $65,96467,785 and $67,405$58,430 in 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively, are not included in the table above.
The Bank is exempt from ordinary federal, state, and local taxation, except employment and real property taxes. No tax-related fees were paid to PwC during the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021.
The Audit Committee of the board of directors has adopted the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy (Pre-Approval Policy). In accordance with the Pre-Approval Policy and applicable law, the Audit Committee pre-approves audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and non-audit services to be provided by the Bank’s independent registered public accounting firm. The term of any pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval unless the Audit Committee specifically provides otherwise. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee reviews the list of specific services and projected fees for services to be provided for the next 12 months and pre-approves services as the Audit Committee deems necessary. Under the Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee has granted pre-approval authority to the Chairmanchair and the Vice-Chairmanvice chair of the Audit Committee, subject to limitation as set forth in the Pre-Approval Policy. The Chairmanchair or the Vice-Chairmanvice chair must report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. New services that have not been pre-approved by the Audit Committee that are in excess of the pre-approval fee level established by the Audit Committee must be presented to the entire Audit Committee for pre-approval. InFor the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 2019,2021, 100 percent of the audit fees, audit-related fees, and all other fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Financial Statements. The following financial statements of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, set forth in Item 8 above, are filed as part of this Report.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238 )
| | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | |
Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20202022 and 20192021 | |
Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 | |
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 | |
Statements of Capital Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 | |
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 | |
| Notes to Financial Statements | |
(b) Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are being filed with or incorporated by reference as a part of this Report:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Exhibit | | Dated Filed |
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 3.1 | | 10/26/12 |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 3.1 | | 10/31/19 |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 99.2 | | 8/5/11 |
| 4.2 | | | | 10-K | | 4.2 | | 3/5/20 |
| 10.1 | | | | 10-K | | 10.1 | | 3/8/18 |
| 10.2 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | 1/28/20 |
| 10.3 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | 1/9/09 |
| 10.4 | | | | 10-12G | | 10.5 | | 3/17/06 |
| 10.5 | | | | | | | | |
| 10.6 | | | | 10-K | | 10.8 | | 3/23/12 |
| 10.7 | | | | 10-K | | 10.6 | | 3/14/14 |
| 10.8 | | | | 10-K | | 10.7 | | 3/9/17 |
| 10.9 | | | | 10-K | | 10.8 | | 3/9/17 |
| 10.10 | | | | 8-K | | 99.1 | | 8/5/11 |
| 31.1 | | | | | | | | |
| 31.2 | | | | | | | | |
| 32.1 | | | | | | | | |
| 99.1 | | | | | | | | |
| 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document - The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document. + | | | | | | |
| 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.+ | | | | | | |
| 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.+ | | | | | | |
| 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.+ | | | | | | |
| 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.+ | | | | | | |
| 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.+ | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | * Denotes management contract or compensatory plan. | | | | | | |
| | + Furnished herewith. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Dated Filed |
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 10/26/12 |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 12/11/21 |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 10/8/21 |
| 4.2 | | | | | | |
| 10.1 | | | | 10-K | | 3/8/18 |
| 10.2 | | | | 8-K | | 1/28/20 |
| 10.3 | | | | 8-K/A | | 4/21/21 |
| 10.4 | | | | 8-K | | 8/24/22 |
| 10.5 | | | | 8-K | | 1/9/09 |
| 10.6 | | | | 10-12G | | 3/17/06 |
| 10.7 | | | | | | |
| 10.8 | | | | 10-Q | | 5/6/22 |
| 10.9 | | | | 8-K/A | | 4/21/21 |
| 10.10 | | | | 10-K | | 3/9/17 |
| 10.11 | | | | 10-K | | 3/9/17 |
| 10.12 | | | | 8-K | | 8/5/11 |
| 31.1 | | | | | | |
| 31.2 | | | | | | |
| 32.1 | | | | | | |
| 99.1 | | | | | | |
| 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document - The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document. + | | | | |
| 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.+ | | | | |
| 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.+ | | | | |
| 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.+ | | | | |
| 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.+ | | | | |
| 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.+ | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | * Denotes management contract or compensatory plan. | | | | |
| | + Furnished herewith. | | | | |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg |
| | Name: W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg |
| | Name: W. Wesley McMullanKirk R. Malmberg |
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Haig H. Kazazian III |
| | Name: Haig H. Kazazian III |
| | �� Title: SeniorExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ William T. Shaw |
| | Name: William T. Shaw |
| | Title: Senior Vice President |
| | and Controller |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Richard A. WhaleyR. Thornwell Dunlap, III |
| | Name: Richard A. WhaleyR. Thornwell Dunlap, III |
| | Title: Chair of the Board of Directors |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 2021 | By /s/ Brian E. Argrett
|
| | Name: Brian E. Argrett |
| | Title: Vice Chair of the Board of Directors |
| | |
Date: | March 4, 2021 | By /s/ Travis Cosby, III
|
| | Name: Travis Cosby, III |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Suzanne S. DeFerie |
| | Name: Suzanne S. DeFerie |
| | Title: DirectorVice Chair of the Board of Directors |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ R. Thornwell Dunlap, III/s/ Eduardo J. Arriola |
| | Name: Thornwell Dunlap, IIIEduardo J. Arriola |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ William C. Handorf |
| | Name: William C. Handorf |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Scott C. Harvard |
| | Name: Scott C. Harvard |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
Date: | March 4, 2021 | |
By /s/ Jonathan Kislak
| | Name: Jonathan Kislak |
| | Title: Director | | | |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Kim C. Liddell |
| | Name: Kim C. Liddell |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By/s/ William L. Lusk, Jr |
| | Name: EdwinaWilliam L. Payne*Lusk, Jr |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By _________________/s/ Garrett S. Richter |
| | Name: Garrett S. RichterKathleen C. McKinney* |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ John B. Rucker/s/ Brian P. McLaughlin |
| | Name: John B. RuckerBrian P. McLaughlin |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Edwina L. Payne |
| | Name: Edwina L. Payne |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 10, 2023 | By /s/ John B. Rucker |
| | Name: Kim D. Saunders*John B. Rucker |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 4, 202110, 2023 | By /s/ Robert L. Strickland, Jr.Kim D. Saunders |
| | Name: Robert L. Strickland, Jr.Kim D. Saunders |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | Ms. Payne and Ms. Saunders joined the board of directors effective January 1, 2021. Given the short time period between their election and the date of this report, these directors were not asked to sign this report.March 10, 2023 | By /s/ James M. Stubbs |
| | Name: James M. Stubbs |
| | Title: Director |
| | |
| Date: | March 10, 2023 | By /s/ Richard A. Whaley |
| | Name: Richard A. Whaley |
| | Title: Director |