UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 
 
FORM 10-K 
 
 
(Mark One)
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019
Or 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                  to                 
Commission file number 001-35817 
 
 
CANCER GENETICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
 
 
 
Delaware 04-3462475
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
201 Route 17 North 2nd Floor
Rutherford, NJ 07070
(201) 528-9200
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) 
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per shareCGIX NASDAQ Capital Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
 
 

Indicate by check if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes:  ¨    No:  ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes:  ý    No:  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website; if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes:  ý    No:  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form  10-K.  ý
Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):Act.
 
Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer 
¨  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
ý
  Smaller reporting company ý
Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes:  ¨    No:  ý

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $27$8.0 million on June 30, 2016,2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price of $1.99$4.80 on that date.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of March 1, 2017:May 28, 2020: 
Class Number of Shares
Common Stock, $.0001 par value 18,935,5942,107,598

Documents incorporated by reference

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.None.



TABLE OF CONTENTS 
PART I 1.   1.  
 1A.   1A.  
 1B.   1B.  
 2.   2.  
 3.   3.  
 4.   4.  
PART II 5.   5.  
 6.   6.  
 7.   7.  
 7A.   7A.  
 8.   8.  
 9.   9.  
 9A.   9A.  
 9B.   9B.  
PART III 10.   10.  
 11.   11.  
 12.   12.  
 13.   13.  
 14.   14.  
PART IV 15.   15.  
 16.   16.  

EXPLANATORY NOTE

As previously disclosed on Cancer Genetics, Inc.’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 30, 2020, the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 Annual Report”) was delayed due to circumstances related to the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) and its impact on the Company’s operations. In particular, COVID-19 has caused severe disruptions in critical personnel’s transportation and limited access to the Company’s facilities in Rutherford, New Jersey (just outside of Manhattan) negatively impacting the ability of its staff and professional advisors to perform their various functions. This has, in turn, delayed the Company’s ability to complete its audit and prepare the 2019 Annual Report. The Company relied on the SEC’s Order Under Section 36 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Modifying Exemptions From the Reporting and Proxy Delivery Requirements for Public Companies, dated March 4, 2020 and amended March 25, 2020 (Release Nos. 34-88318 and 34-88465), to delay the filing of the 2019 Annual Report.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential,” or the negative of those terms, and similar expressions and comparable terminology intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect ourthe Company's current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties including those set forth below and under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent ourthe Company's estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K and, except as required by law, we undertakethe Company undertakes no obligation to update or review publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. You should read this annual report on Form 10-K and the documents referenced in this annual report on Form 10-K and filed as exhibits completely and with the understanding that ourthe Company's actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualifythe Company expects. The Company qualifies all of ourits forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:
 
ourthe Company's ability to adapt its business for future developments in light of the global outbreak of the novel coronavirus, which continues to rapidly evolve;
the Company's ability to achieve profitability by increasing sales of our laboratory teststhe Company's preclinical CRO services focused on oncology and services and to continually develop and commercialize novel and innovative diagnostic tests and services for cancer patients;immuno-oncology;
ourthe Company's ability to raise additional capital to repay its indebtedness and meet ourits liquidity needs;
our ability to clinically validate our pipeline of genomic microarray tests currently in development;
ourthe Company's ability to execute on ourits marketing and sales strategy for our genomic testsits preclinical research services and gain acceptance of our testsits services in the market;
ourthe Company's ability to develop new tests and keep pace with rapidly advancing market and scientific developments;
ourthe Company's ability to satisfy U.S. (including FDA) and international regulatory requirements with respect to our testsits services;
the Company's ability to maintain its present customer base and obtain new customers;
competition from preclinical CRO services companies, many of which are newmuch larger than the Company in terms of employee base, revenues and still evolving;overall number of customers and related market share;
our ability to obtain reimbursement from governmental and other third-party payors for our tests and services;
competition from clinical laboratory services companies, diagnostic tests currently available or new tests that may emerge;
ourthe Company's ability to maintain ourthe Company's clinical and research collaborations and enter into new collaboration agreements with highly regarded organizations in the cancer field of oncology so that, among other things, we havethe Company has access to thought leaders in the fieldadvanced preclinical and to a robust number of samples to validate our tests;
our reliance on a limited number of customers and our ability to maintain our present customer base and obtain new customers;translational science;
potential product liability or intellectual property infringement claims;
our reliance on a limited number of suppliers for components for our tests;
ourthe Company's dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply or manufacture our tests;it with instruments and specialized supplies;
ourthe Company's ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of scientists, clinicians, sales personnel and other key personnel with extensive experience in oncology and immuno-oncology, who are in short supply;
ourthe Company's ability to obtain or maintain patents or other appropriate protection for the intellectual property in ourits proprietary tests and services;
ourthe Company's ability to effectively manage its international businesses in Australia, Europe and China, including the expansion of its customer base and volume of new contracts in these markets;
the Company's dependency on the intellectual property licensed to usthe Company or possessed by third parties; and
our ability to expand our relationships with leading distributors and medical facilities in emerging markets;
ourthe Company's ability to adequately support future growth.

PART I
Item 1.Business.

The share numbers throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect a 1-for-30 reverse stock split that the Company effected October 24, 2019.

Overview

We areCancer Genetics, Inc. (the "Company") supports the efforts of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries to develop innovative new drug therapies. Until the closing of the Business Disposals (as defined below) in July 2019, the Company was an emerging leader in the field ofenabling precision medicine enablingin oncology by providing multi-disciplinary diagnostic and data solutions, facilitating individualized therapies inthrough the field of oncology through ourCompany's diagnostic products andtests, services and molecular markers. We develop, commercializeFollowing the Business Disposals, the Company currently has an extensive set of anti-tumor referenced data based on predictive xenograft and syngeneic tumor models from the acquisition of vivoPharm, Pty Ltd. (“vivoPharm”) in 2017, to provide molecular-Discovery Services such as contract research services, focused primarily on unique specialized studies to guide drug discovery and biomarker-based testsdevelopment programs in the oncology and services that enable physicians to personalize the clinical management of each individual patient by providing genomic information to better diagnose, monitor and inform cancer treatment and that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged in oncology trials to better select candidate populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing information regarding genomic factors influencing subject responses to therapeutics. We have a comprehensive, disease-focused oncology testing portfolio. Ourimmuno-oncology fields. The Company's tests and techniques target a wide range of cancers,indications, covering nineall ten of the top ten cancers in prevalence in the United States, with additional unique capabilities offered by ourits FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test for identifying difficult to diagnose tumor types or poorly differentiated metastatic disease.

Our visionThe Company offers preclinical services such as predictive tumor models, human orthotopic xenografts and syngeneic immuno-oncology relevant tumor models in its Hershey, PA facility, and is to become the oncology diagnostics partner for pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinicians by participatinga leader in the entire care continuum from bench to bedside. We believefield of immuno-oncology preclinical services in the oncology industryUnited States. This service is undergoing a rapid evolutionsupplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its approach to diagnostic, prognosticthe Company's Australian-based facilities in Clayton, VIC, and treatment outcomes (theranostic) testing, embracing precision medicine and individualized testing as a means to drive higher standards of patient treatment and disease management. Similarly, pharmaceutical and biotech companies are increasingly working with precision diagnostic and molecular technology providers such as CGI to provide molecular profiles on clinical trial participants. These profiles may help identify biomarker and genomic variations that may be responsible for differing responses to oncology therapies, thereby increasing the efficiency of trials while lowering costs. We believe tailored and combination therapies can revolutionize oncology care through molecular- and biomarker-based testing services, enabling physicians and researchers to target the factors that make each patient and disease unique.Gilles Plains, SA (effective in February 2020).

We believe the next wave in cancer management will bring together testing capabilities for germline, or inherited mutations,Historical Business and somatic mutations that arise in tissues over the course of a lifetime. We have created a unique position in the industry by providing both targeted somatic analysis of tumor sample cells alongside germline analysis of an individual's non-cancerous cells' molecular profile as we attempt to continue achieving milestones in precision medicine.Key Strategic Divestitures

Cancer is genetically-drivenThe Company was founded in 1999 to conduct critical research and constitutes a diverse classdevelopment of diseases with various causes, each characterized by uncontrollable cell growth. Many cancers are becoming increasingly understood at a molecular level and it is possible to attribute specific cancers to identifiable genetic changes in unhealthy cells. Cancer cells contain modified genetic material compared to normal human cells. Common genetic abnormalities correlated toinnovative diagnostic tests for the benefit of helping physicians treat complicated cancer include gains or losses of genetic material on specific chromosomal regions (loci) or changes in specific genes (mutations) that ultimately result in detrimental cellular changes followed by cancerous or pre-cancerous conditions. Understanding the differences in these molecular changes helps clinicians to identify and stratify different forms of cancer in order to optimize patient treatment and patient management. Therefore, understanding and analysis of cancer at the molecular level is not only useful for diagnostic purposes, but we also believe it can play an important role in prognosis and disease management. We believe technology that can apply predictive information has the potential to dramatically improve treatment outcomescases for patients living with cancer. Our molecular-blood-borne disease. Upon becoming a publicly-traded company through an initial public offering in 2013, the Company completed a series of acquisitions which expanded the footprint of the business globally, and biomarker-basedenlarged the Company's capabilities to offer unique diagnostic tests for cancer aimand services to remove subjectivity from the diagnostic phase, and add prognostic information, thus enabling personalized treatments based on cancer analysis at its most basic level.

Our business is based on demand for molecular- and biomarker-based diagnostic services from three main sectors, including cancer centers and hospitals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and extended the research community. CliniciansCompany's development and oncologistspatient care expertise to solid tumor cancers. Until the consummation of the Business Disposals (as defined below) in cancer centersJuly 2019, the Company was an emerging leader in enabling precision medicine in oncology by providing multi-disciplinary diagnostic and hospitals seek testing since these methods often produce higher valuedata solutions, facilitating individualized therapies through the Company's diagnostic tests, services and more accurate cancer diagnostic information than traditional analytical methods. Ourmolecular markers.

The Company utilized relatively the same proprietary and disease-focusednonproprietary diagnostic tests, aim to provide actionable information that can guide patient management decisions, potentially resulting in decreased costs for care providerslaboratory developed tests (LDTs) and patients while streamlining therapy selection. Our services are also sought by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in designing and running clinical trials to determine the value and efficacy of oncology treatments and therapeutics. We believe trial participants' likelihood of experiencing either favorable or adverse responses to the trial treatment may be influenced or dependent on genomic factors. Our testing services may increase trial efficiency, subject safety and trial success rates. Our services are also sought by researchers and research groups seeking to identify biomarkers and develop methods for diagnostic technologies and tests for disease. We aggressively pursue the strategy of trying to demonstrate increased value and efficacy with payors who are trying to contain costs and academic collaborators seeking to develop new insights and cures.

Our market strategy is organized to align with the three aforementioned industry segments. We utilize relatively the same

technologies across eachall of these businessesits service offerings to deliver results-oriented information which we believe is or will become important to cancer treatment and patient management. OurThe Company's portfolio primarily included comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarrays, gene expression tests, addressnext generation sequencing (NGS) panels, and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes. The Company provided testing services from its Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (“CLIA”) - certified and College of American Pathologists (“CAP”) - accredited laboratories in Rutherford, NJ and Raleigh, NC.

BioServe Biotechnologies

On April 26, 2018, the limitationsCompany sold its India subsidiary, BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited (“BioServe”) to Reprocell, Inc., for $1.8 million.

siParadigm, Inc.

On July 5, 2019, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Clinical Agreement”) by and among the Company and siParadigm, LLC (“siParadigm”), pursuant to which the Company sold to siParadigm certain assets associated with the Company’s clinical laboratory business (the “Clinical Business,” and such assets, the “Designated Assets”) and agreed to cease operating the Clinical Business. The Designated Assets include intellectual property, equipment and customer lists associated with the Clinical Business, and for a period the Company was providing certain transitional services to siParadigm pursuant to the Clinical Agreement. The cash consideration paid by siParadigm at closing was approximately $747 thousand, which includes approximately $45 thousand for certain equipment plus a $1.0 million advance payment of traditional cancer diagnostic approaches,the Earn-Out (as defined below), less approximately $177 thousand of supplier invoices paid directly by siParadigm, an adjustment of $11 thousand and transaction

costs of approximately $110 thousand. The Earn-Out, to be paid over the 24 months post-closing, is based on fees for all tests performed by siParadigm for the Company’s clinical customers during the 12-month period following the closing (the “Earn-Out”). The Clinical Business sale (together with the BioPharma Disposal, defined below, the “Business Disposals”) was completed on July 8, 2019.

Interpace Biosciences, Inc.

On July 15, 2019, the Company entered into a secured creditor asset purchase agreement (the “BioPharma Agreement”) by and among the Company, Gentris, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”), Interpace Biosciences, Inc. (formerly known as Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.) (“IDXG”) and a newly-formed subsidiary of IDXG, Interpace BioPharma, Inc. (“Buyer”). The BioPharma Agreement provided for a consensual private foreclosure sale by PFG of all assets relating to the Company’s BioPharma Business, including reliancethe lease agreements to its CLIA certified and CAP accredited laboratories in Rutherford, NJ and Raleigh, NC (as defined in the BioPharma Agreement) to Buyer (the “BioPharma Disposal”). The BioPharma Disposal was consummated on human inspectionJuly 15, 2019.

Pursuant to the BioPharma Agreement, Buyer purchased from PFG certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of specimensthe Company relating to the BioPharma Business, providing as gross consideration $23.5 million, less certain closing adjustments totaling $2.0 million, of which $7.7 million was paid in the form of a promissory note issued by Buyer to the Company (the “Excess Consideration Note”) and interpretationthe remainder was paid to PFG in cash. PFG utilized the cash proceeds to satisfy the outstanding balances of clinical measurements,the Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) asset-based revolving line of credit (“ABL”) and inter-institutional variability. Our suite of clinical and biopharma services aimthe $6.0 million term note to remove subjectivity from diagnoses and additionally provide information that may influence treatment selection that cannot be obtained from anatomic pathology and staining techniques alone. We believe the level of personalized treatment required to optimize a patient's treatment regimenPFG (“PFG Term Note”), and to maximize clinical trial success rates may be significantly improved throughsatisfy certain transaction expenses. The balance of approximately $2.3 million  was delivered to the useCompany along with the Excess Consideration Note. The Excess Consideration Note which required interest-only quarterly payments at a rate of molecular-6% per year, was settled on October 24, 2019 for $6.0 million, including interest of $24 thousand. The Buyer withheld from the settlement of the Excess Consideration Note approximately $775 thousand for a net worth adjustment (assets less liabilities) of the BioPharma business (“Net Worth”), $153 thousand to secure collection of certain older accounts receivable of the Company purchased by Buyer (“AR Holdback”) and biomarker-based cancer characterization.an additional $735 thousand as security for indemnification obligations of the Company for any breaches of certain limited warranties and covenants of the Company and other specified items, subject to agreed-upon caps, baskets and survival periods as set forth in the BioPharma Agreement (“Indemnification Holdback”). The Company received the full amounts of the AR Holdback and the Indemnification Holdback in April and May 2020, respectively.

The following table lists our market strategyCompany and Buyer also entered into a transition services agreement (the “TSA”) pursuant to which the Company and Buyer are providing certain services to each other to accommodate the transition of the BioPharma Business to Buyer. In particular, the Company agreed to provide to Buyer, among other things, certain personnel services, payroll processing, administration services and benefit administration services (collectively, the “Payroll and Benefits Services”), for a period not to exceed six months from July 15, 2019, subject to the terms and conditions of the TSA, in exchange for payment or reimbursement, as applicable, by customer category:Buyer for the costs related thereto, including salaries and benefits for certain of the Company’s BioPharma employees during the transition period. The Company continues to provide the Payroll and Benefits Services under the TSA with respect to a limited number of employees. In addition, the Buyer is reimbursing the Company, in part, for the salaries and benefits of John A. Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Glenn Miles, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

Customer CategoryTypes of CustomersNature of Services
Clinical Services
• Hospitals
• Cancer Centers
• Clinics
Clinical services provide information on diagnosis, prognosis and predicting treatment outcomes (theranosis) of cancers to guide patient management.
Biopharma Services• Pharmaceutical and Biotech companies performing clinical trialsBiopharma services provide companies with customized solutions for patient stratification and treatment selection through an extensive suite of molecular- and biomarker-based testing services, customized assay development and trial design consultation.
Discovery Services
• Pharmaceutical and Biotech companies
• Academic Institutions
• Government-Sponsored Research Institutions
Discovery services provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new molecular-based biomarkers for disease.
The Business Disposals have been classified as discontinuing operations in conformity with US GAAP. Accordingly, BioServe, BioPharma and Clinical operations and balances have been reported as discontinuing operations and removed from all financial disclosures of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

In 2016, we generated approximately 57%Continuing Operations

With the acquisition of our revenue from BiopharmavivoPharm on August 15, 2017, the Company enhanced its Discovery Services approximately 39% from Clinical Servicescapabilities. The Company is currently executing a strategy of partnering with pharmaceutical and approximately 4% from Discovery Services. In 2015, we generated approximately 64%biotech companies, academic institutions and governmental research centers as oncology diagnostic specialists by supporting therapeutic discovery. The Company's customers are increasingly attracted to working with it on preclinical development of our revenue from Biopharma Services, approximately 31% from Clinical Servicesbiomarker detection methods, response to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and approximately 5% from Discovery Services.early prediction of clinical outcomes which is supported by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems as a unique service offering in the immuno-oncology space.

WevivoPharm is a contract research organization (“CRO”) that specializes in planning and conducting unique, specialized studies to guide drug discovery and development programs with a concentration in oncology and immuno-oncology. These studies range from early compound selection to developing comprehensive sets of utilizein vitro and in vivo data, as needed for FDA Investigational New Drug (“IND”) applications. vivoPharm has developed industry recognized capabilities in early phase development and discovery, especially in immuno-oncology models, tumor micro-environment studies, specialized pharmacology services, and

PDx (patient derived xenograft) model studies that support basic discovery, preclinical and phase 1 clinical trials. vivoPharm’s studies have been utilized to support over 250 IND submissions to date across a range of therapeutic indications, including lymphomas, leukemia, GI-cancers, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and other non-cancer rare diseases. vivoPharm is presently serving over 50 biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies across four continents in over 100 studies and trials with highly specialized development, clinical and preclinical research. Over the past 15 years, vivoPharm has also generated an extensive library of human xenograft and syngeneic tumor models, including subcutaneous, orthotopic and metastatic models. vivoPharm offers services in assessment of safety, toxicology and bioanalytic services for small and bio-molecules.

The Company continues to leverage vivoPharm’s international presence to access global market opportunities. vivoPharm’s headquarters in Australia specializes in safety and toxicology studies, including mammalian, genetic and in vitro, along with bioanalytical services including immune-analytical capabilities. The Company operates from multiple locations in Victoria and South Australia. vivoPharm’s U.S.-based laboratory, located at the Hershey Center for Applied Research in Hershey, Pennsylvania, primarily focuses on screening and efficacy testing for a wide range of pharmaceutical and chemical products. The third location, in Munich, Germany, hosts project management and marketing personnel.

Strategy

The Company's market strategy is to focus on pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and academic and governmental research facilities, developing innovative new drug discoveries. The Company's Discovery Services include preclinical anti-tumor efficacy, GLP compliant toxicity studies and small molecular and biologics analytical services, and the Company provides the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify and to develop new compounds and molecular-based biomarkers for diagnostics and therapeutics.

The Company offers preclinical services such as predictive tumor models, human orthotopic xenografts and syngeneic immuno-oncology relevant tumor models in its Hershey, PA facility and continues to work toward being a leader in the field of immuno-oncology preclinical services in the United States. This service is supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its Australian-based facilities in Clayton, VIC and Gilles Plains, SA.

In 2019, until the Business Disposals, the Company utilized relatively the same proprietary and nonproprietary molecular diagnostic tests and technologies across all of ourits service offerings outside of Discovery Services to deliver results-oriented information important to cancer treatment and patient management. OurThe Company's portfolio primarily includesincluded comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarrays, gene expression tests, next generation sequencing (NGS) panels, and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes. We provide ourThe Company provided its testing services from ourits Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (“CLIA”) - certified and College of American Pathologists (“CAP”) - accredited laboratories in Rutherford, NJ Los Angeles, CA, and Raleigh, NC, as well as our NABL and GMP-certified laboratories in Hyderabad, India and Shanghai, China.NC.

Market Overview

United States Clinical Oncology Market Overview

Despite many advances in the treatment of cancer, it remains one of the greatest areas of unmet medical need. In 2015,2019, the World Health Organization attributed 8.89.6 million deaths (16% of all deaths) worldwideglobally to cancer-related causes, and projects that over the next two decades the number of new cancer, cases will rise to approximately 23 million by the year 2032.which is about 1 in 6 deaths. Within the United States, cancer is the second most common cause of death, exceeded only by heart disease, accounting for nearly one out of every four deaths. The incidenceAgency for Healthcare Research and deaths caused byQuality estimated that the majordirect medical treatment costs of cancer categories are staggering. The following table published by The American Cancer Society shows estimated new cases and deaths in 2016 in the United States for selected major2015 were $80.2 billion. The incidence, deaths and economic loss caused by cancer types:


Cancer Type Estimated New Cases For 2016 Estimated Deaths For 2016
Breast............................ 249,260
 40,890
Cervical......................... 12,990
 4,120
Colorectal...................... 134,490
 49,190
Endometrial................... 60,050
 10,470
Kidney........................... 62,700
 14,240
Leukemia...................... 60,140
 24,400
Lung.............................. 224,390
 158,080
Melanoma..................... 76,380
 10,130
Multiple Myeloma........ 28,170
 11,500
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas................... 72,580
 20,150
Ovarian......................... 22,280
 14,240
Pancreatic...................... 53,070
 41,780
Prostate......................... 180,890
 26,120
are staggering. I
n the United States in 2020, it is expected that in total there will be approximately 1.8 million new cancer cases diagnosed, which is the equivalent of approximately 4,950 new cases each day, according to the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) 2019 data.

United States and International Clinical Trials Market Overview

The global clinical trials market size is expected to reach USD $69.8 billion by 2027, exhibiting a 5.1% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during the forecast period, according to a February 2020 report published by Grand View Research, Inc. The United States is currently a world leader in biopharmaceutical research and development and manufacturing. In Fiscal Year 2016,2020, the National Cancer Institute received a budget of $5.21$6.44 billion, an increase of $260.5$297 million over FY 2015,2019, to issue grants to address health care disparities, support research, with a targeted investment in enhanced and conduct oncology clinical trials.early detection of disease through the analysis of circulating biomarkers using minimally invasive methods, as well as a focused investment in cancer prevention and treatment including research on new vaccines to prevent cancer-causing infections and investigational immuno-oncology drugs and drug combinations. The Pharmaceutical Research and ManufacturesManufacturers of America (PhRMA) reports that the average cost to develop a drug, including trial

failures, can be as high as $2.6 billion and the approval process from development to market may be as long as 15 years. According to the National Cancer Institute, since the 1990s, cancer death rates in the United States have declined 23%, and approximately 83% of life expectancy increases in cancer patients are due to new treatments and oncology medications.

Outside of the United States, growth in the pharmaceuticals and clinical trials market is continuing, and trials are increasingly becoming more complex. Growth in the European pharma market is anticipated to be driven largely by the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France and Italy. The size of this market is expected to grow 25% between 2017 and 2022, accounting for nearly 70% of the European pharma market by 2022.

While oncology drugs have the potential to be among the most personalized therapeutics, oncology clinical trials continuevery few successfully make it to have some of the poorest approval rates.market. The application of pharmacogenomics to oncology clinical trials enables researchers to better predict differences, initially driven by data derived in drug response, efficacy and toxicity among trial participants, as well as to optimize treatment regimens based on these differences. According to IMS Health, it is estimated that by 2020, half of all pharmaceutical sales in the United States will be from specialty drugs, a category of drugs including oncology treatments tailored to patients’ genomic profiles. A study by Grand Market Research places the oncology market at 34% of revenue for molecular diagnostics services in 2013, with the pharmacogenomics market following closely at 26.3%. Pharmacogenomics is the study of genetic analysis based on a patient's response to a particular therapy or drug. We believepreclinical research. The Company believes a growing demand for faster development of personalized medicines and more effective clinical trials are growth drivers of this market.

India Clinical Oncologymarket, and Biopharma Market Overviewits core expertise is preclinical efficacy, toxicity and bioanalytical services.

IndiaMore specific to the Company's targeted markets around the world, according to Market Insight Reports (October 2019) the global oncology-based in-vivo CRO market was valued at over $799 million in 2018 and is projected to reach $1.47 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 7.9% from 2019 to 2026. has a growingThe major factors contributing to the growth of this market for molecular diagnostics and oncology services. According to a report published by Ernst and Young, approximately 1.1 million new casesinclude the rising incidence of cancer were officially reported,cases worldwide, the rise in the geriatric population, the increasing number of specific therapies in the oncology pipeline and as many as 2.2 million new cases were estimated,the presence of large numbers of pipeline drugs. The number of late-stage pipeline therapies rose from 711 in India2017 to 849 in 2015. In those cancer types for which we provide diagnostic2018, representing an increase of 19%, and prognostic proprietary tests and services, incidences are also predicted to rise steadily over the next decade even whileuse of oncology-based in-vivo CRO helps in deriving the population is expected to experience a decrease in population growth rate. Gynecological cancers account for approximately 12% of the total cancer incidence among the Indian population, and 30% of the cancer incidence among women. Furthermore, 70-80% of cancers in India are first detected in advanced or terminal stages, indicating an important opportunity in this market for DNA-based oncology diagnostic tools that can provide early-stage information to guide treatment resulting in greater survival rates.

It is estimated by the India Brand Equity Foundation that the Indian biotech and pharmaceutical markets are expected to experience over a 30% increase in compound annual growth rate by 2025 due to favorable business conditions and increasing government expenditures in these sectors. The biopharmaceutical services segment accountednovel therapies for the largest share of sector growth in 2013diagnosis, prevention, and 2014, accounting for approximately 64% of total revenues, and experienced the highest growth rate in this period, with an approximately 18% compound annual growth rate. Over the next decade, growth in this industry is anticipatedtreatment to come largely from India’s strong position in biosimilar and molecular diagnostics, as well as from personalized medicine. The Indian government has been increasing spending on the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors through 5-year budget allocation plans aimed at research and development as well as health care.

China Clinicalpatients. Oncology and Biopharma Market Overview

The Chinese biopharma market is currently the third largest pharma market globally, after the United States and Japan. With more than one fifth of the world's population, China is an important market for pharmaceutical and biotech products and China's minister of health has pledged that the country will spend an additional $11.8 billion to advance biotech innovation from 2015 to 2020 in its 13th five-year plan. Cancer is one of the leading public health problemsmost studied indication areas, as per the statistics available from government agencies around the world. Other factors that are playing a key role in China, representing approximately 25%driving growth in the oncology-based in-vivo CRO business include greater federal funding for research studies and increasing research expertise in the industry.

The Company has a particularly strong set of experiences working in the preclinical area of checkpoint inhibitors and specifically immunotherapies. Drug development is continuing to attract biotech companies transforming scientific innovation into practice-changing cancer drugs, thereby driving demand for the Company's services. When considering druggable targets within the different immuno-oncology drug classes, T cell immunomodulators and cell therapies had the largest increase in new targets in the past 2 years, which suggests that more innovation is going into these drug classes than the other IO drug classes. Overall, active drugs in development has grown from 2,030 to 3,876, a 91% increase in just 2 years, resulting in more than 3,400 active clinical trials evaluating such agents, 66% of all deathsactive immuno-oncology drugs in urban areas and 21% in rural areas. Over the past 30 years, the risk factors for cancer in China have been increasing, including an aging population, decreased environmental conditions and westernization of diet and lifestyle. Our Shanghai laboratory performs clinical trials services for biotech and pharmaceutical companies in China, where governmental regulations prevent human samples from being exported from the country.development.

Our The Company'sStrategy

We areWith the Business Disposal transactions completed in 2018 and 2019, the Company is now focused on delivering our comprehensive cancer profiling and state of the art molecular diagnostic capabilitiesits pre-clinical CRO services to a diverse group of oncology market participants, including:
Biotechnology
biotechnology companies;
Pharmaceuticalpharmaceutical companies;
Cancer centers;
Community hospitals;governmental agencies; and
Researchacademic research centers

All of theseThese participants require biomarker-based assessmentsyngeneic and xenograft tumor models to support the development of cancernovel biomarkers and biomarker-based informationincreasing technological expertise to collect key data sets for their clinical trials, understand and manage the patient, their cancertherapeutic development and design customized therapy choices. We believeThe Company believes that our integratedits approach to testing combined with our ability to rapidly translate research insights about the genetics and molecular mechanisms of cancer into the clinical settingresearch community will improve patient treatment decision-making, and will become a key componentlead to innovative products being developed, particularly in the standardarea of care for personalized cancer treatment. Our approach is to develop and commercialize proprietary molecular and biomarker-based tests and services to enable us to provide a full service solution to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of targeted cancers and to better predict differences in drug response, efficacy and toxicity among clinical trial participants, as well as to optimize treatment regimens based on these differences.immuno-oncology therapies. To achieve this, we intendand in order of its focus and priority, the Company intends to:

Leverage ourits specialized, disease-focused genomic and molecular knowledge, insights and proprietaryservice portfolio to secure additional collaborations or partnerships with leading biotech and pharmaceutical companies and clinical research organizations. Oncology drugs haveorganizations through its vivoPharm business. This will deepen its relationships with its existing clients and expand its unique portfolio of Discovery Service offerings in the potential to be amongUnited States, Europe, Australia and the most personalized of therapeutics, and yet oncology trials have onerest of the worst approval success rates. In an effortworld.  Biotech and Pharmaceutical companies engaged in the identification of therapeutic targets and novel oncology and immuno-oncology treatments often require support in trial design, assay development, preclinical research and clinical research and trial management. vivoPharm’s suite of oncology-focused services, including proprietary tumor models, enables the Company to improve the outcome of these trials,increase its market share in drug identification, drug rescue and more rapidly advance targeted therapeutics, the biotechnologydrug repurposing studies. The Company believes vivoPharm’s capabilities provide it with opportunities to deepen its relationships with existing customers through additional discovery and pharmaceutical community is increasingly looking to companies like us that have both proprietary disease insights and comprehensive testing services as they move toward biomarker-based therapeutics. We believe our comprehensive, disease-focused testing portfolio, which covers 9 of the 10 most prevalent solid and hematological cancers positions us to help the biotech and pharmaceutical community with clinical trials and companion diagnostic development in areas of our core expertise. downstream molecular work.

Leverage our expanded clinicalits growing preclinical business to leverage sales force and our relationships with global central laboratories to expand our customer base. We believe that our joint clinical sales force is among the largest oncology-focused clinical sales groupsits former biopharma business in the molecular diagnostics field.U.S., Europe and Australia, to provide its integrated service offerings. By leveraging ourThe Company believes that by combining the efforts of its business development teams inside of its existing and prospective Discovery clients, which entail many biopharma companies, the Company can leverage its capabilities from preclinical development of biomarker detection methods, responses to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and early prediction of clinical outcomes, supported by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and biopharma sales force in the United States, along with our relationships with international central laboratories and clinical research organizations, we are ablesyngeneic tumor test systems, to target our sales and marketing effortshelp drive its access to meet the needs of an expanding and diverse customer segment. In mid-2015 and 2016, we entered into a strategic alliance with the laboratory services group of ICON plc, and with BARC Global Central Laboratory, a division of Cerba HealthCare, each a global contract research organization (“CRO”), which we are leveraging to expand our biopharma customer base.support other translational oncology initiatives.

Continue ourits focus on translational oncology and drive innovation and cost efficiency in diagnostics by continuing to develop next generation sequencing offerings independently and through our joint venturecollaborations with Mayo Clinic.academic and cancer research centers and other key opinion leaders and their organizations. Translational oncology refers to ourthe focus on bringing novel research insights that characterize cancer at the genomic level directly and rapidly into the clinical setting with the overall goal of improving value to patients and providers in the treatment and management of disease. We believeThe Company believes that continuing to develop ourits existing platforms and next generation sequencing panelstumor models will enable significant growth and efficiencies within ourits business. We will continue to develop next generation sequencing panels independently as well as leverage our joint venture with Mayo Clinic to advance this diagnostic technology.


WorkEngage key strategic partners in the U.S. and abroad to leverage its remaining intellectual property portfolio and unique capabilities to grow its revenue. The Company entered into a strategic partnership in China to license its Tissue of Origin® test in that region; the Company announced a supply agreement with health care providersAgilent Technologies to expand the distribution of its proprietary FHACT probe internationally, and payorsthe Company entered into a partnership with Cellaria in the U.S. to demonstrate the valuecharacterize Cellaria’s pipeline of our testing in providing cost efficientcommercial and accountable care. We seekcustom-developed biopharma products to increase market access by entering into contracts with key payors, cost management organizationscreate innovative models that provide detailed, and insurance providers andpatient-specific, assessment of response to secure additional coverage for FHACT®, TOO® and Focus::NGS® panels.therapy.

Continue to aggressively manage ourits cost structure. We areThe Company is focused on aggressively managing ourits operating costs while continuing to seek additional revenue growth opportunities. We areThe Company is implementing measures to streamline costs across ourits laboratory facilities, including integrating administrative functions across our US and Indiaits global operations, and implementing a cloud-based laboratory management system across all of its sites, along with key financial enterprise resource planning and human resource systems that enable greater efficiency.

OurThe Company's Service Offerings

OurPrior to the Business Disposals, the Company's business iswas based on demand for molecular- and biomarker-based characterization of cancers from three main sectors: (1) biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, (2) cancer centers and hospitals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and(3) the research community. Clinicians and oncologists in cancer centers and hospitals seek molecular-based testing since these methods often produce higher value and more accurate cancer diagnostic information than traditional analytical methods. Our proprietary and disease-focused tests aim to provide actionable information that can guide patient management decisions, potentially resulting in decreased costs for care providers and patients while streamlining therapy selection. OurWith the Company's continued focus on the preclinical market, its services are alsoprimarily sought by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in designing and runningpreparing to run clinical trials, for their value and efficacy in oncology and immuno-oncology treatments and therapeutics. We believeThe Company believes trial participants' likelihood of experiencing either favorable or adverse responses to the trial treatment can be determined first by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems, and in early development through biomarker testing,identification and development, thereby increasing trial efficiency, participant safety and trial success rates. OurBiotechnology and pharmaceutical companies also seek the Company's services in preclinical trial design and drug development, in order to effectively and efficiently select those therapeutic candidates most likely to progress to clinical treatment options. The Company's services are also sought by researchers and research groups seeking to identify biomarkers and panels and develop methods for diagnostic technologies and tests for disease. We aggressively pursue the strategy of trying to demonstrate increased value and efficacy with payors who are trying to contain costs and academic collaborators seeking to develop new insights and cures.

OurDiscovery Services

Through its acquisition of vivoPharm in 2017, the Company offers proprietary preclinical test systems valued by the pharmaceutical industry, biotechnology companies and academic research centers. In particular, the Company's preclinical development of biomarker detection methods, response to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and early prediction of clinical outcome is supported by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems. vivoPharm specializes in conducting studies tailored to guide drug development, starting from compound libraries and ending with a comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo data and reports, as needed for Investigational New Drug filing. vivoPharm operates in AAALAC accredited and GLP-compliant audited facilities. The Company provides its preclinical services, with a focus on efficacy models, from its Hershey, PA facility for the U.S. and European markets, and supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its Australia-based facility in Clayton, VIC and Gilles Plains, SA (effective in February 2020).

The Company's Discovery Services provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new molecular- and biomarker-based indicators for disease and to determine the pharmacogenomics, toxicity and efficacy of potential therapeutic candidate compounds. Discovery Services offered include development of both xenograft and syngeneic animal models,

toxicology and genetic toxicology services, pharmacology testing, pathology services, and validation of biomarkers for diseases including cancers. The Company also provides consulting, guidance and preparation of samples and clinical trial design. The Company believes the ability to analyze variations in biomarkers, tumor cells and compounds, and to interpret results into meaningful predictors of disease or indicators of therapeutic success is essential to discovering new molecular markers for cancer, new therapeutics, and targets for therapies.

Retained Tests

The Company continues to own a portfolio of proprietary disease-focused tests, which are currently available for licensing to the biopharma industry and diagnostic companies. The Company currently has a U.S. based diagnostic laboratory company offering its FHACT test domestically and a Chinese laboratory company preparing to offer its Tissue of Origin test in China.

HPV-Associated Cancers

HPV-associated cancers, including cervical, anal, and head and neck cancers, are caused by infection with high-risk variants of human papillomavirus (HPV), and are responsible for approximately 4% of all cancer diagnoses worldwide. Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among women. According to the National Institutes of Health, while there are more than 100 types of HPV, approximately 15 types are considered to be cancer-causing, with only 2 strains being responsible for 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. Cervical cancer may be detected by traditional methods, including Pap smears and liquid cytology, where cervical cells obtained by Pap smear are observed by a pathologist, or by HPV typing, which identifies the strain of HPV virus presently infecting the patient. Neither of these techniques is able to identify the likelihood of the HPV-infection’s developing into cancerous or precancerous lesions. According to the National Cancer Institute, about 50 million Pap smear tests to detect HPV are performed in the United States each year. It is estimated that approximately 2 million patients have abnormal Pap smear test results and are referred for biopsy/colposcopy as a result of such tests. However, only approximately 12,000 of these patients will develop cervical cancer. It is believed that early detection of HPV-associated cancers and lesions most likely to progress to cancer could eliminate unnecessary biopsies/colposcopies and thereby reduce health care costs.

The Company's Proprietary Tests for HPV-Associated Cancers

TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
FHACT®
•     HPV-Associated Cancers
-    Cervical Cancer
-    Anal Cancer
-    Head & Neck Cancers
•     FHACT® is the Company's proprietary, 4-color FISH-based DNA probe designed to identify aberrations in four important chromosomal regions that have been implicated in cancers associated with infection by the human papilloma virus (HPV): cervical, anal and oropharyngeal.
•     FHACT® is designed to determine copy number changes of four particular genomic regions by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). These regions of DNA give specific information about the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer, in particular the stage and subtype of disease.
•     FHACT® is designed to enable earlier detection of abnormal cells and can identify the additional genomicbiomarkers that allow for the prediction of cancer progression.
•     FHACT® is designed to leverage the same Pap smear sample taken from the patient during routine screening, thus reducing the burden on the patient while delivering greater information to the clinician.
•     The Company offers an application of FHACT® as an LDT for cervical cancer and are developing applications for additional cancer targets.
•     The Company has obtained CE marking for FHACT®, which allows the Company to market the test in the European Economic Area.


Solid Tissue Cancers

The term “solid tumors” encompasses abnormal masses of cells that do not include fluid areas (e.g. blood) or cysts. Solid tumors are composed of abnormal cell growths that originate in organs or soft tissue and are normally named after the types of cells that form them. Examples of solid tumors include breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer and melanoma. Solid tumors may be benign (not cancerous) or malignant (cancerous) and may spread from their primary tissue of origin to other locations in the body (metastasis). There are over 200 individual chemotherapeutic drugs available for combating solid tumor cancers. Selection of an appropriate course of treatment for a patient may depend on identification of the gene mutation or mutations present in their particular cancer and on determining the cancer’s tissue of origin. Metastatic tumors with an uncertain primary site can be a difficult clinical problem. In tens of thousands of oncology patients every year, no confident diagnosis is ever issued, making standard-of-care treatment impossible.

The Company's Proprietary Tests for Solid Tissue Cancers

TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
Tissue of Origin®
•     Solid Tissue Cancers
-    Thyroid
-    Breast
-    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
-    Gastric
-    Pancreas
-    Colorectal
-    Liver
-    Bladder
-    Kidney
-    Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
-    Melanoma
-    Ovarian
-    Sarcoma
-    Testicular Germ Cell
-    Prostate
•     Tissue of Origin® (TOO®) is FDA-cleared, Medicare-reimbursed, and provides extensive analytical and clinical validation for statistically significant improvement in accuracy over other methods.
•     TOO® is a gene expression test that is used to identify the origin in cancer cases that are metastatic and/or poorly differentiated and unable to be typed by traditional testing methods.
•     TOO® increases diagnostic accuracy and confidence in site-specific treatment decisions, and leads to a change in patient treatment based on results 65% of the time it is used.
•     TOO® assesses 2,000 genes, covering 15 of the most common tumor types and 90% of all solid tumors.
•     In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company acquired the TOO® test through its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Response Genetics, Inc.

Tissue of Origin® Test. The Company continues to own and maintain its FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test, or TOO®, a gene expression test that is indicated when there is clinical uncertainty about a poorly differentiated or undifferentiated, or a metastatic tumor where the primary tissue of cancer development is unknown. The Tissue of Origin® test the Company believes is currently the only FDA-cleared test of its kind on the market, strategyand can determine the most likely tissue of origin of a patient tumor sample from the fifteen most common tumor types - including thyroid, breast, pancreas, colon, ovarian and prostate - which account for ninety percent of all incidences of solid tissue tumors, by measuring the expression levels of 2,000 individual genes. TOO® is organized to alignsupported by extensive analytical and clinical validation data from robust, multi-center clinical studies. The Company believes TOO® can reduce the need for repeated testing, examinations, imaging and biopsy procedures by providing clinicians with the three aforementioned industry segments. We utilize relativelyprimary tissue type with greater certainty than traditional diagnostic techniques. This in turn empowers physicians to select the same proprietary tests, non-proprietary test and technologies across eachcorrect type of these businesses to deliver results-oriented information important to cancer treatment and patient management.earlier in the course of the patient’s therapy.

Discontinued Services

Biopharma Services

Until the Business Disposals, the Company's Biopharma Services included laboratory and testing services performed for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in clinical trials. The Company's focus was on providing these clients with oncology specific and non-oncology genetic testing services for phase I-IV trials along with critical support of ancillary services. These services included: biorepository, clinical trial logistics, clinical trial design, bioinformatics analysis, customized assay development. DNA and RNA extraction and purification, genotyping, gene expression and biomarker analyses. The Company

also sought to apply its expertise in laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”) to assist in developing and commercializing drug-specific companion diagnostics. The Company established business relationships with key instrument manufacturers to support their platforms in the market, and to drive acceptance among biopharmaceutical sponsors developing innovative immuno-oncology therapies.

In addition to the tests and services the Company provided to biotech and pharmaceutical companies, the Company developed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels focused on pharmacogenomics and oncology that will inform researchers of trial subjects' drug sensitivities.

The Company also utilized its laboratories to provide clinical trial services to biotech and pharmaceutical companies and clinical research organizations to improve the efficiency and economic viability of clinical trials. The Company's clinical trials services leveraged its knowledge of clinical oncology and molecular diagnostics and its laboratories’ fully integrated capabilities.

From a laboratory infrastructure standpoint, the Company possessed capabilities in histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, cytogenetics and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), as well as sophisticated molecular analysis techniques, including next generation sequencing. This allowed for comprehensive esoteric testing within one lab enterprise, with a CAP-accredited biorepository serving as a central hub for specimen tracking. Using this approach, the Company was able to support demanding clinical trial protocols requiring multiple assays and techniques aimed at capturing data on multiple biomarkers. The Company's suite of available testing platforms allowed for highly customized clinical trial design which was supported by a dedicated group of development scientists and technical personnel.

The Company also provided genetic testing for drug metabolism to aid biotech and pharmaceutical companies identify subjects' likely responses to treatment, allowing these companies to conduct more efficient and safer clinical trials. The Company believes pharmacogenomics drug metabolism testing helps deliver the promise of personalized medicine by enabling researchers to tailor therapies in development to differences in patients' genomic profiles.

ClinicalDiscovery Services

We provide ourThrough its acquisition of vivoPharm in 2017, the Company offers proprietary testspreclinical test systems valued by the pharmaceutical industry, biotechnology companies and services, alongacademic research centers. In particular, the Company's preclinical development of biomarker detection methods, response to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and early prediction of clinical outcome is supported by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems. vivoPharm specializes in conducting studies tailored to guide drug development, starting from compound libraries and ending with a comprehensive rangeset of non-proprietary oncology-focusedin vitro and in vivo data and reports, as needed for Investigational New Drug filing. vivoPharm operates in AAALAC accredited and GLP-compliant audited facilities. The Company provides its preclinical services, with a focus on efficacy models, from its Hershey, PA facility for the U.S. and European markets, and supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its Australia-based facility in Clayton, VIC and Gilles Plains, SA (effective in February 2020).

The Company's Discovery Services provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new molecular- and biomarker-based indicators for disease and to determine the pharmacogenomics, toxicity and efficacy of potential therapeutic candidate compounds. Discovery Services offered include development of both xenograft and syngeneic animal models,

toxicology and genetic toxicology services, pharmacology testing, pathology services, and validation of biomarkers for diseases including cancers. The Company also provides consulting, guidance and preparation of samples and clinical trial design. The Company believes the ability to analyze variations in biomarkers, tumor cells and compounds, and to interpret results into meaningful predictors of disease or indicators of therapeutic success is essential to discovering new molecular markers for cancer, new therapeutics, and targets for therapies.

Retained Tests

The Company continues to own a portfolio of proprietary disease-focused tests, and laboratory services, to oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician offices. Our proprietary tests target cancers thatwhich are difficult to prognose and predict treatment outcomes through currently available mainstream techniques. We utilize an expansive rangefor licensing to the biopharma industry and diagnostic companies. The Company currently has a U.S. based diagnostic laboratory company offering its FHACT test domestically and a Chinese laboratory company preparing to offer its Tissue of non-proprietaryOrigin test and technologies to provide a comprehensive profile for each patient we serve. Clinical testing is available through anatomic pathology, flow cytometry, karotype, FISH, liquid biopsy and molecular diagnostics (including next generation sequencing and gene expression panels).in China.

Our comprehensive oncology-focused testing servicesHPV-Associated Cancers

HPV-associated cancers, including cervical, anal, and head and neck cancers, are caused by infection with high-risk variants of human papillomavirus (HPV), and are responsible for approximately 4% of all cancer diagnoses worldwide. Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among women. According to the National Institutes of Health, while there are utilizedmore than 100 types of HPV, approximately 15 types are considered to be cancer-causing, with only 2 strains being responsible for 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. Cervical cancer may be detected by traditional methods, including Pap smears and liquid cytology, where cervical cells obtained by Pap smear are observed by a pathologist, or by HPV typing, which identifies the strain of HPV virus presently infecting the patient. Neither of these techniques is able to identify the likelihood of the HPV-infection’s developing into cancerous or precancerous lesions. According to the National Cancer Institute, about 50 million Pap smear tests to detect HPV are performed in the diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment outcomes (theranosis) of cancerUnited States each year. It is estimated that approximately 2 million patients have abnormal Pap smear test results and are growing rapidlyreferred for biopsy/colposcopy as clinicians demand more precisea result of such tests. However, only approximately 12,000 of these patients will develop cervical cancer. It is believed that early detection of HPV-associated cancers and more comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of their patients. We believe our abilitylesions most likely to rapidly translate research insights about the geneticsprogress to cancer could eliminate unnecessary biopsies/colposcopies and molecular mechanisms of cancer into the clinical setting will improve patient treatment and management and that this approach can become a key component in the standard ofthereby reduce health care for personalized cancer treatment. We utilize highly skilled scientists, pathologists and hematologists in our laboratories, with 46% of individuals holding advanced degrees. These individuals assist our customers in integrating and technically assessing the testing results for their patients.costs.

We believe that our proprietary tests provide superior diagnostic and prognostic values than other currently available tests and services. For example, prior to the introduction of MatBA®, the assessment of the gain or loss on only four chromosomal regions and potentially one gene mutation was available to clinicians when testingThe Company's Proprietary Tests for and stratifying a CLL patient. MatBA® improves on this by identifying information on a total of twenty chromosomal regions, providing more valuable diagnostic data and critical information about the risk of progression and overall prognosis of the patient. For particular cases, patient results indicating a “favorable outcome” that would have been reported to the clinician was determined by MatBA® to be inaccurate, leading to a change in the prognosis and consequently decision-making by the clinician regarding the management of these patients.HPV-Associated Cancers

TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
FHACT®
•     HPV-Associated Cancers
-    Cervical Cancer
-    Anal Cancer
-    Head & Neck Cancers
•     FHACT® is the Company's proprietary, 4-color FISH-based DNA probe designed to identify aberrations in four important chromosomal regions that have been implicated in cancers associated with infection by the human papilloma virus (HPV): cervical, anal and oropharyngeal.
•     FHACT® is designed to determine copy number changes of four particular genomic regions by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). These regions of DNA give specific information about the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer, in particular the stage and subtype of disease.
•     FHACT® is designed to enable earlier detection of abnormal cells and can identify the additional genomicbiomarkers that allow for the prediction of cancer progression.
•     FHACT® is designed to leverage the same Pap smear sample taken from the patient during routine screening, thus reducing the burden on the patient while delivering greater information to the clinician.
•     The Company offers an application of FHACT® as an LDT for cervical cancer and are developing applications for additional cancer targets.
•     The Company has obtained CE marking for FHACT®, which allows the Company to market the test in the European Economic Area.


Our clinical services strategy is focused on direct salesSolid Tissue Cancers

The term “solid tumors” encompasses abnormal masses of cells that do not include fluid areas (e.g. blood) or cysts. Solid tumors are composed of abnormal cell growths that originate in organs or soft tissue and are normally named after the types of cells that form them. Examples of solid tumors include breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer and melanoma. Solid tumors may be benign (not cancerous) or malignant (cancerous) and may spread from their primary tissue of origin to oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician officesother locations in the United States,body (metastasis). There are over 200 individual chemotherapeutic drugs available for combating solid tumor cancers. Selection of an appropriate course of treatment for a patient may depend on identification of the gene mutation or mutations present in their particular cancer and expanding our relationshipson determining the cancer’s tissue of origin. Metastatic tumors with leading distributors and medical facilities in emerging markets. As partan uncertain primary site can be a difficult clinical problem. In tens of our market strategy for our clinical services, we offer the branded testing programs described below.thousands of oncology patients every year, no confident diagnosis is ever issued, making standard-of-care treatment impossible.

CompleteTM Program. Our CompleteTM program is our branded program offering a unique suite of common and proprietary tests that assist clinicians in determining the best treatment options to improve patient outcomes. Each CompleteTM program integrates the latest diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers across multiple testing methodologies. We offer Complete testingThe Company's Proprietary Tests for a number of hematological cancers and solid tumors, including AML, CLL, DLBCL, MDS, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), colorectal, lung and breast cancers.Solid Tissue Cancers

Expand DXTM/Technical-Only Testing.According to the American Hospital Association, there are nearly 5,000 community hospitals in the United States. Community hospitals represent a large target market for our genomictests and services because approximately 85% of cancer patients in the United States are initially diagnosed in such hospitals as reported to the National Cancer Database. Our Expand DXTM/Technical-Only Testing program is a partnership initiative offered by us to help community-based hospitals expand their clinical services. By partnering with us community-based hospitals and pathology labs have cost-effective access to advanced testing technologies and specialized testing capabilities and deep experience in hematological and solid-tumor oncology diagnostics of our clinical reference laboratories in New Jersey and California. Through this program, clinicians can send patient specimens to our laboratories, where the technical component of the testing is performed, and then access the test results through an online portal in order to perform the professional component and provide a diagnosis. We believe our Expand DXTM/Technical-Only Testing program will enable community hospitals and pathology laboratories to optimize and expand their oncology services to better serve their cancer patients and reduce costs associated with cancer care.
TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
Tissue of Origin®
•     Solid Tissue Cancers
-    Thyroid
-    Breast
-    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
-    Gastric
-    Pancreas
-    Colorectal
-    Liver
-    Bladder
-    Kidney
-    Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
-    Melanoma
-    Ovarian
-    Sarcoma
-    Testicular Germ Cell
-    Prostate
•     Tissue of Origin® (TOO®) is FDA-cleared, Medicare-reimbursed, and provides extensive analytical and clinical validation for statistically significant improvement in accuracy over other methods.
•     TOO® is a gene expression test that is used to identify the origin in cancer cases that are metastatic and/or poorly differentiated and unable to be typed by traditional testing methods.
•     TOO® increases diagnostic accuracy and confidence in site-specific treatment decisions, and leads to a change in patient treatment based on results 65% of the time it is used.
•     TOO® assesses 2,000 genes, covering 15 of the most common tumor types and 90% of all solid tumors.
•     In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company acquired the TOO® test through its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Response Genetics, Inc.

Tissue of Origin® Test.Test Our. The Company continues to own and maintain its FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test, or TOO®, is a gene expression test that is indicated when there is clinical uncertainty about a poorly differentiated or undifferentiated, or a metastatic tumor where the primary tissue of cancer development is unknown. The Tissue of Origin® test we believethe Company believes is currently the only FDA-cleared test of its kind on the market, and can determine the most likely tissue of origin of a patient tumor sample from the fifteen most common tumor types - including thyroid, breast, pancreas, colon, ovarian and prostate - which account for ninety percent of all incidences of solid tissue tumors, by measuring the expression levels of 2,000 individual genes. TOO® is supported by extensive analytical and clinical validation data from robust, multi-center clinical studies. We believeThe Company believes TOO® can reduce the need for repeated testing, examinations, imaging and biopsy procedures by providing clinicians with the primary tissue type with greater certainty than traditional diagnostic techniques. This in turn empowers physicians to select the correct type of treatment earlier in the course of the patient’s therapy.

In addition, we have developed the SummationTM Report which, we believe, provides an integrated view of a patient's test results and diagnosis in a user-friendly, visually appealing format for clinicians. Our pathologists and laboratory directors prepare these SummationTM Reports based on the clinical information and diagnosis provided by our laboratory professionals. All of our testing technologies are integrated into a Summation Report to allow oncologists to efficiently arrive at a definitive diagnosis and drive complete and effective decisions.Discontinued Services

Biopharma Services

Until the Business Disposals, the Company's Biopharma services includeServices included laboratory and testing services performed for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in clinical trials. Our biopharma servicesThe Company's focus was on providing pharmaceutical companiesthese clients with oncology specific and non-oncology genetic testing services for phase I-IV trials along with critical support of ancillary services. These services include:included: biorepository, clinical trial logistics, clinical trial design, bioinformatics analysis, customized assay development. DNA and RNA extraction and purification, genotyping, gene expression and biomarker analyses. We The Company

also seeksought to apply ourits expertise in LDTslaboratory developed tests (“LDTs”) to assist in developing and commercializing drug-specific companion diagnostics.

Industry research has shown many promising drugs have produced disappointing results in clinical trials. For example, a study by Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto estimated that 85% of the phase III trials testing new therapies for solid tumors studied over a five-year period failed The Company established business relationships with key instrument manufacturers to meetsupport their primary endpoint. Given such a high failure rate of oncology drugs, combined with constrained budgets for biotech and pharmaceutical companies, there is a significant need for drug developers to utilize molecular diagnostics to decrease these failure rates. For specific molecular-targeted therapeutics, the identification of appropriate biomarkers indicative of disease type or prognosis may help to optimize clinical trial patient selection and increase trial success rates by helping clinicians identify patients that are most likely to benefit from a therapy based on their individual genomic profile.


Our Select One® offering was created specifically to help the biopharmaceutical community with clinical trials and companion diagnostic development in areas of our core expertise. We believe that oncology drugs have the potential to be among the most personalized of therapeutics, and yet oncology clinical trials continue to have some of the poorest approval rates. In an effort to improve the outcome of these trials, and more rapidly advanced targeted therapeutics, the biotechnology and pharmaceutical community is increasingly looking to companies that have both proprietary disease insights and comprehensive testing services as they move toward biomarker-based therapeutics.

The United States National Institutes of Health reported over 95,000 clinical trials were being conductedplatforms in the United States as of March 2017,market, and over 15,000 of these trials were actively recruiting participants for studies with oncology pharmaceuticals or biologics. Molecular- and biomarker-based testing services have been altering the clinical trials landscape by providing biotech and pharmaceutical companies with information about trial subjects' genetic profiles that may be able to inform researchers whether or not a subject will benefit from the trial drug or will experience adverse effects. Streamlined subject selection and stratification, and tailored therapies selected to maximally benefit each group of subjects may increase the number of trials that result in approved therapies and make conducting clinical trials more efficient and less costly for biotech and pharmaceutical companies. In 2016, 22 new drugs were approved by the FDA, and over a quarter of these drugs were oncology-focused, highlighting the potential value of incorporating genomic information into oncology clinical trial design.drive acceptance among biopharmaceutical sponsors developing innovative immuno-oncology therapies.

In addition to the tests and services the Company provided to biotech and pharmaceutical companies, we are developing NGSthe Company developed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels focused on pharmacogenomics and oncology that will inform researchers of trial subjects' drug sensitivities.

We provide the following services to biotech and pharmaceutical companies and researchers conducting clinical trials:

Genotyping and Pharmacogenomics Testing Services

Over 400 genotyping assays including drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters and receptors.

Over 19 validated gene expression assays.

Testing for the FDA's Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Biomarkers in Drug Labels recommended panel.

Loss of heterozygosity and copy number detection assays.

WeThe Company also utilize ourutilized its laboratories to provide clinical trial services to biotech and pharmaceutical companies and clinical research organizations to improve the efficiency and economic viability of clinical trials. OurThe Company's clinical trials services leverage ourleveraged its knowledge of clinical oncology and molecular diagnostics and ourits laboratories’ fully integrated capabilities. Our Select One® program integrates clinical information into

From a laboratory infrastructure standpoint, the drug discovery processCompany possessed capabilities in orderhistology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, cytogenetics and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), as well as sophisticated molecular analysis techniques, including next generation sequencing. This allowed for comprehensive esoteric testing within one lab enterprise, with a CAP-accredited biorepository serving as a central hub for specimen tracking. Using this approach, the Company was able to provide customized solutions for patient stratification and treatment. By utilizing biomarkers, we intend to optimize thesupport demanding clinical trial patient selection. This may result in an improved success rateprotocols requiring multiple assays and techniques aimed at capturing data on multiple biomarkers. The Company's suite of theavailable testing platforms allowed for highly customized clinical trial design which was supported by a dedicated group of development scientists and may eventually help biotech and pharmaceutical companies to select patients that are most likely to benefit from a therapy based on their genetic profile. We believe we are one of only a few laboratories with the capability to combine somatic and germline mutational analyses in clinical trials.technical personnel.

Our Select One® clinical trial services are aimed at developing customizable tests and techniques utilizing our proprietary tests and laboratory services to provide enhanced genetic signature analysis and more comprehensive understanding of complex diseases at earlier stages. We leverage our knowledge of clinical oncology and molecular diagnostics and provide access to our genomic database and assay development capabilities for the development and validation of companion diagnostics. This potentially enables companies to reduce the costs associated with development by determining earlier in the development process if they should proceed with additional clinical studies. We have been chosen by 8 of the top 10 biotech and pharmaceutical companies including Gilead Sciences Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, and H3 Bio (a division of Eisai) to provide clinical trial services and molecular profiling for patient selection and monitoring. Additionally, through our services we gain further insights into disease progression and the latest drug development that we can incorporate into our proprietary tests and services.

WeThe Company also provideprovided genetic testing for drug metabolism to aid biotech and pharmaceutical companies identify subjects' likely responses to treatment, allowing these companies to conduct more efficient and safer clinical trials. We believeThe Company believes pharmacogenomics drug metabolism testing helps deliver the promise of personalized medicine by enabling researchers to tailor therapies in development to differences in patients' genomic profiles.

Discovery Services

Through its acquisition of vivoPharm in 2017, the Company offers proprietary preclinical test systems valued by the pharmaceutical industry, biotechnology companies and academic research centers. In particular, the Company's preclinical development of biomarker detection methods, response to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and early prediction of clinical outcome is supported by its extended portfolio of orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems. vivoPharm specializes in conducting studies tailored to guide drug development, starting from compound libraries and ending with a comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo data and reports, as needed for Investigational New Drug filing. vivoPharm operates in AAALAC accredited and GLP-compliant audited facilities. The Company provides its preclinical services, with a focus on efficacy models, from its Hershey, PA facility for the U.S. and European markets, and supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its Australia-based facility in Clayton, VIC and Gilles Plains, SA (effective in February 2020).

Our discovery servicesThe Company's Discovery Services provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new molecular- and biomarker-based indicators for disease.disease and to determine the pharmacogenomics, toxicity and efficacy of potential therapeutic candidate compounds. Discovery Services offered include development of both xenograft and syngeneic animal models,

toxicology and genetic toxicology services, we offer includepharmacology testing, pathology services, and validation of biomarkers for diseases including cancers, from which tests for diagnosis or prognosis may be established. Wecancers. The Company also provideprovides consulting, guidance and preparation of samples and clinical trial design. We believeThe Company believes the ability to analyze variations in biomarkers, tumor cells and compounds, and to interpret these changesresults into meaningful predictors of disease or indicators of diagnosistherapeutic success is essential to discovering new molecular markers for cancer, new therapeutics, and targets for therapies.

Our Disease-Focused Testing PortfolioRetained Tests

Our disease-focused testing portfolio includes ourThe Company continues to own a portfolio of proprietary disease-focused tests, along withwhich are currently available for licensing to the biopharma industry and diagnostic companies. The Company currently has a comprehensive range of non-proprietary oncology-focused testsU.S. based diagnostic laboratory company offering its FHACT test domestically and a Chinese laboratory services. We have a comprehensive oncology testing portfolio, spanning nine of the ten most prevalent solid and hematological cancers, including the FDA-cleared test for tumors of unknown origin, our FDA-clearedcompany preparing to offer its Tissue of Origin®, or TOO® test. With the exception of the TOO®Origin test we offer our proprietary tests in the United States as laboratory-developed tests, or LDTs, and internationally as CE-marked in vitro diagnostic medical devices. The non-proprietary testing services we offer are focused in part on the specific oncology categories where we are developing our proprietary tests. We believe that there is significant synergy in developing and marketing a complete set of tests and services that are disease-focused and delivering those tests and services in a comprehensive manner to help guide and inform treatment decisions. The insights that we develop in delivering non-proprietary services are often leveraged in the development of our proprietary programs and in the validation of our proprietary programs.

Our proprietary tests are molecular- and biomarker-based genomic tests: microarrays, probes, gene expression panels, liquid biopsy and next generation sequencing. Each is directed at identifying specific genetic aberrations in cancer cells that serve as markers for diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis. We offer microarrays, next generation sequencing, gene expression and FISH probes because each serves a unique diagnostic or prognostic function. FISH- based tests, or probes, offer great sensitivity while microarrays provide a more comprehensive analysis of the cancer genome, NGS panels offer a method of detecting mutations or chromosomal aberrations of lesser frequency while gene expression can identify which genes are affected when the cancer type is unknown, and liquid biopsy techniques provide a method of isolating and detecting rare cells, such as tumor cells, circulating in a patient's blood, enabling a less invasive approach than tissue biopsy to obtain cells for additional biomarker analysis through one or more of the aforementioned tests. The tables below list and describes our proprietary tests that target hematologic cancers, HPV-associated cancers, solid tumors, hereditary cancers and immune-oncology biomarkers.

Hematological Cancers

As a group, hematologic cancers (cancers of the blood, bone marrow or lymph nodes) display significant clinical, pathologic and genetic complexity. Traditionally, diagnosis relies mostly on pathologic examination, flow cytometry and detection of only a few genetic markers. Importantly, the clinical course of the six main subtypes of these neoplasms ranges from indolent (follicular lymphoma) to aggressive (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma), or mixed (chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, or CLL/SLL). Most risk-stratification for treatment decisions were traditionally based on clinical features of the disease. Few molecular prognostic biomarkers were utilized in a clinical setting. There remains an unmet medical need for robust biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, theranosis and overall patient management in B-cell cancers. Given the higher frequency of these malignancies in the United States than in other countries due to relativelylong lifespans and an aging population, we expect significant clinical demand for our tests and services that are focused on hematological cancers.

Our Proprietary Tests for Hematological Cancers
TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages

Focus::NGS®
Focus::CLL™
Focus::Myeloid™
Focus::Lymphoma™

•     Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
•     Myeloid Cancers
-    Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
-    Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
-    Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)
•     B-Cell Lymphomas
•     Focus::NGSTM is our family of next generation sequencing tests developed for the analysis of genomic alterations to determine, guide and inform diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis of particular hematological cancers and solid tumors.
•     Next generation sequencing performs massively parallel sequencing, which is able to detect biomarker mutations and aberrations that are present at very low levels and which may be missed by other, less sensitive methodologies.
•     Our proprietary Focus::CLL™ panel is the only NGS test for CLL that assesses 7 genes in a single test, providing clinically relevant data for prognosis, disease management and treatment selection, and is available both for routine clinical patient diagnosis and management, as well as for patient stratification in clinical trials for CLL or SLL.
•     Our proprietary Focus::Myeloid™ panel is designed to target 54 genes, and we believe it will provide important prognostic information for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as diagnostic and prognostic information for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN)
•     Our proprietary Focus::Lymphoma™ panel enables the targeted sequencing of 220 genes and has the ability to customize reporting that provides clinically actionable information to determine treatment options for patients with various forms of B-Cell Lymphomas.

MatBA®
•     Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
•     Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL)
•     Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
•     Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
•     Follicular Lymphoma (FL)
•     MatBA® is the first targeted oligonucleotide-based microarray we developed for the analysis of genomic alterations to determine prognosis and theranosis in mature B-cell neoplasms.
•     MatBA® is designed to detect genomic copy number changes in mature B-cell neoplasms either solely or in a unique combination, relying on the comparative genomic hybridization of fluorescently differentially-labeled normal DNA and DNA extracted from the cancer specimen (array-CGH).
•     MatBA® was custom-designed to represent 80 regions of the human genome which have diagnostic and/or prognostic value in one or more of the mature B-cell neoplasm subtypes.
•     Unlike other technologies such as FISH, array-CGH using MatBA® simultaneously permits the detection of genomic gains and losses at multiple locations on a chromosome (loci) that characterize the mature B-cell neoplasm subtypes.
•     MatBA® can be routinely applied to the study of a range of specimen types including blood and bone marrow and FFPE biopsy specimens, which are often the only specimen available for analysis of FL, DLBCL and MCL.
China.

HPV-Associated Cancers

HPV-associated cancers, including cervical, anal, and head and neck cancers, are caused by infection with high-risk variants of human papillomavirus (HPV), and are responsible for approximately 4% of all cancer diagnoses worldwide. Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among women. According to the National Institutes of Health, while there are more than 100 types of HPV, approximately 15 types are considered to be cancer-causing, with only 2 strains being responsible for 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. Cervical cancer may be detected by traditional methods, including Pap smears and liquid cytology, where cervical cells obtained by Pap smear are observed by a pathologist, or by HPV typing, which identifies the strain of HPV virus presently infecting the patient. Neither of these techniques is able to identify the likelihood of the HPV-infection’s developing into cancerous or precancerous lesions. According to the National Cancer Institute, about 50 million Pap smear tests to detect HPV are performed in the United States each year. It is estimated that approximately 2 million patients have abnormal Pap smear test results and are referred for biopsy/colposcopy as a result of such tests. However, only approximately 12,000 of these patients will develop cervical cancer. It is believed that early detection of HPV-associated cancers and lesions most likely to progress to cancer could eliminate unnecessary biopsies/colposcopies and thereby reduce health care costs.

OurThe Company's Proprietary Tests for HPV-Associated Cancers


TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
FHACT®
•     HPV-Associated Cancers
-    Cervical Cancer
-    Anal Cancer
-    Head & Neck Cancers
•     FHACT® FHACT® is ourthe Company's proprietary, 4-color FISH-based DNA probe designed to identify aberrations in four important chromosomal regions that have been implicated in cancers associated with infection by the human papilloma virus (HPV): cervical, anal and oropharyngeal.
•     FHACT® FHACT® is designed to determine copy number changes of four particular genomic regions by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). These regions of DNA give specific information about the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer, in particular the stage and subtype of disease.
•     FHACT® is FHACT® is designed to enable earlier detection of abnormal cells and can identify the additional genomic biomarkers that allow for the prediction of cancer progression.
•     FHACT® is FHACT® is designed to leverage the same Pap smear sample taken from the patient during routine screening, thus reducing the burden on the patient while delivering greater information to the clinician.
•     The Company We currently offeroffers an application of FHACT® as an LDT for cervical cancer and are developing applications for additional cancer targets.
•     The Company We havehas obtained CE marking for FHACT®, which allows usthe Company to market the test in the European Economic Area.


Solid Tissue Cancers

The term “solid tumors” encompasses abnormal masses of cells that do not include fluid areas (e.g. blood) or cysts. Solid tumors are composed of abnormal cell growths that originate in organs or soft tissue and are normally named after the types of cells that form them. Examples of solid tumors include breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer and melanoma. Solid tumors may be benign (not cancerous) or malignant (cancerous) and may spread from their primary tissue of origin to other locations in the body (metastasis). There are over 200 individual chemotherapeutic drugs available for combattingcombating solid tumor cancers. Selection of an appropriate course of treatment for a patient may depend on identification of the gene mutation or mutations present in their particular cancer and on determining the cancer’s tissue of origin. Metastatic tumors with an uncertain primary site can be a difficult clinical problem. In tens of thousands of oncology patients every year, no confident diagnosis is ever issued, making standard-of-care treatment impossible.

OurThe Company's Proprietary Tests for Solid Tissue Cancers














TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
Tissue of Origin®
•     Solid Tissue Cancers
-    Thyroid
-    Breast
-    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
-    Gastric
-    Pancreas
-    Colorectal
-    Liver
-    Bladder
-    Kidney
-    Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
-    Melanoma
-    Ovarian
-    Sarcoma
-    Testicular Germ Cell
-    Prostate
•     Tissue of Origin® (TOO®) is FDA-cleared, Medicare-approved,Medicare-reimbursed, and provides extensive analytical and clinical validation for statistically significant improvement in accuracy over other methods.
•     TOO® is a gene expression test that is used to identify the origin in cancer cases that are metastatic and/or poorly differentiated and unable to be typed by traditional testing methods.
•     TOO® increases diagnostic accuracy and confidence in site-specific treatment decisions, and leads to a change in patient treatment based on results 65% of the time it is used.
•     TOO® assesses 2,000 genes, covering 15 of the most common tumor types and 90% of all solid tumors.
•     In the fourth quarter of 2015, wethe Company acquired the TOO® test through ourits acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Response Genetics, Inc.
•     TOO® is FDA-cleared, Medicare-reimbursed, and provides extensive analytical and clinical validation for statistically significant improvement in accuracy over other methods.
Focus::Oncomine™
•     Solid Tissue Cancers
-    Lung
-    Colorectal
-    Melanoma
-    Breast
-    Bladder
-    Thyroid
•     Focus::Oncomine™is one test in our family of next generation sequencing tests developed for the analysis of genomic alterations to determine, guide and inform diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis of solid tumors.
•     Next generation sequencing performs massively parallel sequencing, which is able to detect biomarker mutations and aberrations that are present at very low levels and which may be missed by other, less sensitive methodologies.
•     Focus::Oncomine™ is designed to cover hotspot mutations of 35 unique genes in various different types of solid tumors, allowing for the detection of 989 hotspot variants, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), with a very low input DNA material.
•     Focus::Oncomine™ is designed to detect hotspot mutations that have clinical utility in prognosis or diagnosis or therapeutic implications in various solid tumors.
•     The biomarkers included in Focus::Oncomine™ were selected based on information in the Oncomine Knowledgebase, which compiles genomic information from clinical trials, and were confirmed with industry-leading pharmaceutical partners. The results of the assay should be interpreted in the context of available clinical, pathologic, and laboratory information.

Focus::Renal™•     Kidney
•     Focus::Renal™Tissue of Origin® Test. The Company continues to own and maintain its FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test, or TOO®, a highly-sensitive NGS panel, detects mutations of 76 renal cancer-related genes, as well as genome-wide copy number changes, and critical single nucleotide variants (SNVs), all in a single test, that enable precision diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection for renal cancer patients.
•     Focus::Renal™ is the only NGS panel to simultaneously detect genome-wide copy number changes, SNP genotypes along with mutations in 76 renal cancer-related genes, covering relevant drug pathways.
•     Focus::Renal™ can be performed on a wide variety of patient specimen types, such as needle biopsies, fine-needle aspirates, and resected specimens using both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and fresh/fresh-frozen specimens, including the ones with minimal starting material.
•     Focus::Renal™ was developed by CGI in collaboration with leading cancer centers and academic institutions, including MSKCC, Cleveland Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Center at University of Utah, and University Hospital of Paris.
UroGenRA®
•     Kidney
-    Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC)
-    Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma (chrRCC)
-    Papillary Renal Carcinoma (pRCC)
-    Oncocytoma (OC)
•     Prostate
•     Bladder
•     UroGenRA® has 101 regions of the human genome represented, and these regions can be used for gain/loss evaluation in urogenital neoplasms including kidney, prostate and bladder.
•     UroGenRA®-Kidney Array-CGH provides genomic diagnostic information to assist routine histology in the subtyping of ccRCC, chrRCC and OC from either core needle biopsies or resected specimens.
•     UroGenRA®-Kidney assesses 16 genomic regions that have diagnostic significance in the four main renal cortical neoplasm subtypes.
•     UroGenRA®-Kidney can use DNA from either core needle biopsies or resected specimens, provided as fresh frozen tissue.
•     Result from UroGenRA®-Kidney are analyzed using our proprietary algorithm KidneyPath™ to classify specimens as normal, undetermined, or into one of the four main renal cortical neoplasm subtypes.

Hereditary Cancers

Hereditary cancer syndromes are inherited conditions in which an individual has a greater than normal lifetime risk of developing certain typesgene expression test that is indicated when there is clinical uncertainty about a poorly differentiated or undifferentiated, or a metastatic tumor where the primary tissue of cancer development is unknown. The Tissue of Origin® test the Company believes is currently the only FDA-cleared test of its kind on the market, and are caused by gene mutations that are passedcan determine the most likely tissue of origin of a patient tumor sample from parents to children. In a family with a hereditary cancer syndrome, one or morethe fifteen most common tumor types of cancers may be present in several family members, may develop at an early age, or one person may develop more than one type of cancer. Hereditary cancer syndromes are estimated to- including thyroid, breast, pancreas, colon, ovarian and prostate - which account for up to 10%ninety percent of all cancer diagnoses inincidences of solid tissue tumors, by measuring the United States. Many of the gene mutations that cause hereditary cancers have been identified, and genetic testing may identify whether an individual’s cancer is due to one of these inherited genes. Genetic testing for family members who have not been diagnosed with cancer can also reveal whether they are at an increased risk for developing hereditary cancers.

Our Proprietary Hereditary Cancer Test

TestTargeted CancersTechnology & Advantages
Focus::HERSite™
•     Breast
•     Ovarian
•     Focus::HERSite™is one test in our family of next generation sequencing tests developed for the analysis of genomic alterations to determine, guide and inform diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis of some of the most prevalent hereditary cancers.
•     Next generation sequencing performs massively parallel sequencing, which is able to detect biomarker mutations and aberrations that are present at very low levels and which may be missed by other, less sensitive methodologies.
•     Focus::HERSite™ analyzes the 16 most common genes associated with breast and ovarian cancers and provide comprehensive coverage of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
•     Focus::HERSite™ sequences 16 genes associated with an increased lifetime risk of cancer in a single reaction.
•     Mutations in these genes are typically single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions or deletions, and like BRCA 1/2, the increased cancer risk is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, meaning that one inherited gene is sufficient to cause disease.
•     Sequencing these genes in a given patient increases the clinical sensitivity for overall increase in breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Immuno-Oncology Testing

Immuno-oncology encompasses a method of cancer treatment that harnesses the power of a patient’s own immune system to combat cancer growth and development. Abnormal cells are ordinarily destroyed by the body’s immune system before these cells are able to proliferate and develop into a tumor. In some cancers, abnormal cells have developed mutations allowing them to avoid the body’s natural defenses and these cells are not destroyed by the immune system. Immuno-oncology aims to either activate the immune system to recognize and destroy these cancer cells, or to turn off the mechanisms cancer cells develop than enable them to avoid detection by the immune system, thereby permitting the immune system to recognize and eliminate them. The Cancer Research Institute reports that although there are 6 approved immuno-oncology therapies approved for patient treatment, and there are over 150 clinical trials focused on developing immuno-oncology treatments.

We believe immuno-oncology is rapidly increasing in clinical practice and presents a unique market opportunity when combined with precision testing and traditional and combination oncology therapies. In early 2016, we launched a comprehensive immuno-oncology testing portfolio for use in clinical trials, translational research, and therapy selection for patients. This portfolio is available for clinical trials, patient care, and translational research utilizing multiple technological platforms through our New Jersey and California facilities. Our portfolio of immuno-oncology tests includes immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based tests that can detect novel biomarkers like PD-1 and PD-L1 and flow cytometry-based tests and panels that can assess immune response against cancers by evaluating subsets of immunomodulatory and effector cells. We also offer an NGS-based targeted RNA sequencing test that can measure expression levels of drug targets, tumor infiltrate composition,2,000 individual genes. TOO® is supported by extensive analytical and total immune cell composition. Manyclinical validation data from robust, multi-center clinical studies. The Company believes TOO® can reduce the need for repeated testing, examinations, imaging and biopsy procedures by providing clinicians with the primary tissue type with greater certainty than traditional diagnostic techniques. This in turn empowers physicians to select the correct type of these assays are also available for clinical use and are CLIA- and New York State-approved.treatment earlier in the course of the patient’s therapy.

Discontinued Services

Biopharma Services

Until the Business Disposals, the Company's Biopharma Services included laboratory and testing services performed for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in clinical trials. The Company's focus was on providing these clients with oncology specific and non-oncology genetic testing services for phase I-IV trials along with critical support of ancillary services. These services included: biorepository, clinical trial logistics, clinical trial design, bioinformatics analysis, customized assay development. DNA and RNA extraction and purification, genotyping, gene expression and biomarker analyses. The Company

also sought to apply its expertise in laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”) to assist in developing and commercializing drug-specific companion diagnostics. The Company established business relationships with key instrument manufacturers to support their platforms in the market, and to drive acceptance among biopharmaceutical sponsors developing innovative immuno-oncology therapies.

In addition to the tests and services the Company provided to biotech and pharmaceutical companies, the Company developed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels focused on pharmacogenomics and oncology that will inform researchers of trial subjects' drug sensitivities.

The Company also utilized its laboratories to provide clinical trial services to biotech and pharmaceutical companies and clinical research organizations to improve the efficiency and economic viability of clinical trials. The Company's clinical trials services leveraged its knowledge of clinical oncology and molecular diagnostics and its laboratories’ fully integrated capabilities.

From a laboratory infrastructure standpoint, the Company possessed capabilities in histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, cytogenetics and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), as well as sophisticated molecular analysis techniques, including next generation sequencing. This allowed for comprehensive esoteric testing within one lab enterprise, with a CAP-accredited biorepository serving as a central hub for specimen tracking. Using this approach, the Company was able to support demanding clinical trial protocols requiring multiple assays and techniques aimed at capturing data on multiple biomarkers. The Company's suite of available testing platforms allowed for highly customized clinical trial design which was supported by a dedicated group of development scientists and technical personnel.

The Company also provided genetic testing for drug metabolism to aid biotech and pharmaceutical companies identify subjects' likely responses to treatment, allowing these companies to conduct more efficient and safer clinical trials. The Company believes pharmacogenomics drug metabolism testing helps deliver the promise of personalized medicine by enabling researchers to tailor therapies in development to differences in patients' genomic profiles.

Clinical Services

Until the Business Disposals, the Company provided its oncology and immuno-oncology tests and services to oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician offices. The Company's portfolio contains proprietary tests to target cancers that are difficult to prognose and predict treatment outcomes through currently available mainstream techniques. The Company utilized an expansive range of non-proprietary tests and technologies to provide a comprehensive profile for each patient it serves. Clinical testing was available through anatomic pathology, flow cytometry, karotype, FISH, liquid biopsy and molecular diagnostics (including next generation sequencing and gene expression panels).

Sales and Marketing

OurThe Company's sales and marketing efforts consist of both direct and indirect efforts, with the majority of efforts focused on direct sales in both the United States, Europe and India.Australia. The table below summarizes our sales approach by geographyCompany collaborates with preclinical development teams at pharmaceutical and customer segment:

United StatesClinical Sales
-

-

-

Collaborate with leading research universities and institutions that enable the validation of our new tests.
Work with community-based cancer centers that need a reliable and collaborative partner for cancer testing.
Build relationships with individual thought leaders in oncology, hematology and pathology to deliver services that provide value to their patients.
Biopharma Sales
-

-

Collaborate with scientific development teams at pharmaceutical companies on studies involving translational medicine and genotyping.
Build relationships in the research and development segment to identify partners with a need for biomarker discovery studies.
IndiaClinical Sales
-

-

Develop relationships with oncologists, corporate hospitals and reference labs, as well as with physicians in local clinics.
Engage the population of oncology patients in India, where a majority of oncology drugs are paid for out-of-pocket.
Biopharma & Discovery Sales
-

-

Work with academic and research institutions for validation of our tests in the Indian population.
Collaborate with scientific development teams at biotech and pharmaceutical companies and government agencies on studies involving tests and services.
ChinaBiopharma Sales
-

Leverage US-based companies conducting clinical trials with a component of those trials occurring in China.
biotech companies on studies involving tumor models and therapeutic candidate compound testing.

OurThe Company's U.S. and European business development and sales force professionals have scientific backgrounds in hematology, pathology, and laboratory services, andwith many years of experience in biopharmaceutical and clinical oncology sales, esoteric laboratory sales from leading biopharmaceutical, pharmaceutical or specialty reference laboratory companies. WeThe Company currently havehas a team of 93 business development and sales professionals in the United States and 3 in India. We support our sales force with clinical specialists who bring deep domain knowledge in the design and use of our tests and services.Europe.

In addition to our direct sales force, we entered into agreements with the Laboratory Services group of ICON plc, the global CRO (Nasdaq:ICLR), and BARC Global Laboratories (a part of Cerba Healthcare) to work together to offer biotech and pharmaceutical customers a comprehensive, integrated and efficient solution for laboratory testing for global oncology trials from Phase I through Phase IV. Through our joint service offerings with ICON and BARC, we can provide biotech and pharmaceutical customers with access to combined expertise ranging from complex, oncology-focused molecular and biomarker-based testing to core central laboratory analysis, project and data management and sample logistics on a global basis.

WeThe Company also promote our tests andpromotes its services through marketing channels commonly used by the biopharma and pharmaceutical industries, such as internet, medical meetings and broad-based publication of ourits scientific and economic data. In addition, we providethe Company provides easy-to-access information to ourits customers over the internet through dedicated websites. OurThe Company's customers value easily accessible information in order to quickly review patient or study information.

Research and Development Collaborations

We formally and informally collaborate with leading oncology centers and community-based hospitals to develop our proprietary diagnostic tests, and we work closely with leading cancer researchers at these institutions to develop proprietary tests tailored to their needs and specifications. Additionally, many of these centers have obtained Specialized Programs of Research Excellence status, as designated by the National Cancer Institute. Our collaborations with these centers give us access to large datasets of information that we use to develop our proprietary tests.

Below is a summary of our active key collaborations. In certain cases we have formal written agreements with collaborators and in other cases we have no written agreement with our collaborators or only informal written arrangements.

Collaborating InstitutionPrinciple Investigator(s)Focus of Collaboration
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New York
Dr. Kanti Rai
Dr. Nicholas Chiorazzi
Clinical validation of biomarkers and signatures for CLL diagnosis and therapeutic response
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Dr. Jeremy DurackEvaluation of FISH-based and CHG-array tests
National Cancer Institute, Maryland
Dr. Nicolas WentzensenEvaluation of FHACT®
Kamineni Hospital, Hyderabad, India
Dr. Annie HassanEvaluation of FHACT®
Columbia University, New York
Dr. Azra Raza
Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee
Identification of genomic biomarkers for myeloid cancers
Apollo Hospitals, India
Evaluation of FHACT®
Keck Medicine of University of Southern California, California
Dr. Imran SiddiqiIdentification and evaluation of genomic biomarkers for lymphomas and other B cell malignancies
University of Southern California, California, & HTG Molecular, Arizona
Dr. Pamela WardMicroRNA whole transcription assay validation
University of Southern California, California, & HTG Molecular, Arizona
Dr. Heinz-Josef Lenz and Dr. Yu Sunakawa

Gene expression analysis using an immuno-oncology panel for measurement of response to immune therapy

Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétriere, Paris
Analyze the variability of genomic alterations in renal cancer

Huntsman Cancer Center Institute, University of Utah, Utah
Dr. Neeraj AgarwalEvaluation of biomarkers for kidney cancer diagnosis and therapeutic response and liquid biopsy assay development
Huntsman Cancer Center Institute, University of Utah, Utah and Pfizer
Validation of biomarkers to predict Stutent response and liquid biopsy assay development
Moffitt Cancer Center, Florida
Dr. Anna GiulianoEvaluation of FHACT® for oral cancer
University of Virginia School of Medicine, Virginia, & HTG Molecular, Arizona
Evaluation of genomic signatures in immune response
Yale UniversityDr. Brian ShuchEvaluation of biomarkers in NGS Focus::Renal™ to stratify and monitor patients

Competition

With respect to our clinical services, our principal competition comes from existing mainstream diagnostic methodsThe largest competitors in the global preclinical CRO market are companies like Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC (US), MD Biosciences (US)., IQVIA (US), PAREXEL International Corporation (US), Envigo (US), Charles River (US), ICON PLC (Dublin), PRA Health Sciences (US), Medpace (US), Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (US), WuXi AppTec (China) and laboratories that pathologists and oncologists use and have used for many years or decades. It may be difficult to changeEurofins Scientific (Luxembourg). The players operating in the methods or behavior of the referring pathologists and oncologists to incorporate our molecular diagnostic testing inglobal preclinical CRO market are focusing on product unveilings, along with intensifying their practices. In addition, companies offering capital equipment and kits or reagents to local pathology laboratories represent another source of potential competition. These kits are used directlyglobal presence by the pathologist, which can facilitate adoption.entering untouched markets.

We also face competition from companies that currently offer or are developing products to profile genes, gene expression or protein biomarkers in various cancers. Precision medicine is a new area of science, and we cannot predict what tests others will develop that may compete with or provide results superior to the results we are able to achieve with the tests we develop. Our competitors include public companies such as NeoGenomics, Inc. (including recently acquired Clarient), Quest Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., bioTheranostics, Inc., Genomic Health, Inc.,

Myriad Genetics Inc., and Foundation Medicine, Inc., Invitae Corp., and many private companies. We expect that pharmaceutical and biotech companies will increasingly focus attention and resources on the personalized diagnostic sector as the potential and prevalence increases for molecularly targeted oncology therapies approved by FDA along with companion diagnostics. With respect to our clinical laboratory business we face competition from companies such as Genoptix Medical Laboratory, NeoGenomics, Inc., Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (a division of Opko), LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics and Invitae Corp.

Additionally, projectsProjects related to the molecular mechanisms driving cancer development have received increased government funding, both in the United States and internationally. The National Cancer Institutes'sInstitutes' Cancer Moonshot is anticipated to increase both patient awareness and federal government funding for research and clinical trials. The Federal Government has committed $1.8 billion over a 7 year period to fund the 21st Century Cures Act. As more information regarding cancer genomics and biomarkers becomes available to the public, we anticipatethe Company anticipates that more products aimed at identifying targeted treatment options will be developed and that these products may compete with ours. In addition, competitors may develop their own versions of our tests in countries where we did not apply for patents or where our patents have not issued and compete with us in those countries, including encouraging the use of their test by physicians or patients in other countries.its products.

Third-Party Suppliers

We maintain control, validationThe Company currently relies on third-party suppliers for its specialized research and quality assurance over our NGS panels, DNA microarraysscientific instrumentation and probes. Our microarraysrelated supplies of reagents, tumor cell lines, and NGS panels are designed in our facility by our scientists and technicians using state ofother inventory for it to successfully perform its CRO services for its customers. In addition, the art genomic mapping and analysis software. The specifications for our NGS panels are sent to Thermo Fisher Scientific (Ion Torrent) and Illumina for final manufacturing. Our NGS panels are manufactured under strict quality control and compliance. Upon manufacturing our custom, proprietary NGS panels, they are shipped back to our Rutherford facility for testing and acceptance.

We also currently relyCompany relies on contracted manufacturers and collaborative partners to produce materials necessary for ourits FHACT® and FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test. We plantests. The Company plans to continue to rely on these manufacturers and collaborative partners to manufacture these materials, including those materials required for use in our FDA-cleared TOO® test.materials. The Company does not believe a short-term disruption from any one of these suppliers would have a material effect on its business, nor has the Company experienced any disruptions due to COVID-19.

Patents and Proprietary Technology

Our business developsThe Company has proprietary tests that enable oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician offices to properly diagnose and inform cancer treatment. We relyThe Company relies on a combination of patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, trade secrets, industry know-how, as well as various contractual arrangements, in order to protect the proprietary aspects of ourits technology. The Company may also license its technology to others. The Company believes that no single patent, technology, trademark, intellectual property asset or license is material to its business as a whole.

OurUntil the Business Disposals, the Company's patent portfolio consistsconsisted of 4920 issued U.S. patents, several5 pending U.S. applications, and 175more than 40 foreign patents. We have a disease-focused portfolioMost of patents. Ourthis intellectual property was transferred to those parties the Company entered into to complete the Business Disposals. The Company's key remaining patents currently include:

Hematological cancers. We haveThe Company has two U.S. patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,580,713 and 8,557,747), as well as patents in the EU, India and Canada directed to MatBA®, a microarray for detecting (and distinguishing) particular types of mature B cell neoplasms present in typical non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. These patents and foreign application cover ourthe Company's trademarked MatBA® microarray and are directed to both the microarray itself as well as associated methodologies designed to detect the particular type of mature B cell neoplasm present in a patient. These patents and foreign application also cover the use of computer-assisted means to facilitate and expedite that detection process. The MatBA® microarray patents issued from the first of ourthe Company's family of applications in the microarray space. The term of these patents runs through 2030.

Solid Tumors. We have 13 U.S. patents, including (U.S. Patent Nos. 7,049,059, 7,560,543, 7,732,144, 8,586,311, 8,026,062, 6,956,111, 6,905,821, 7,005,278, 6,686,155, 7,138,507, as well as numerous foreign patents, including patents in Australia, Canada, China and Japan. These patents relate to certain aspects of the gene expression technology used in our solid tumor tests. The solid tumor markers covered by these patents include thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), excision repair gene CC1 (ERCC1), glutathione-s transferase pi (GST-p), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2/neu gene, though our patents are not directed to all aspects of expression of such markers. The term of these patents runs through 2023.

We haveCompany has four U.S. patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,977,506, 8,321,137, 7,747,547 and 8,473,217) covering ourits Tissue of Origin® Test. These patents are directed at systems and methods for detecting biological features in solid tumors. The term of these patents run through 2030.


Urogenital cancers. We have two U.S. patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,603,948 and 8,716,193) and one EU patent. These patents directed to a novel, highly sensitive and specific probe panel which detects the type of renal cortical neoplasm present in a biopsy sample. These patents cover a probe that permits diagnosis of the predominant subtypes of renal cortical neoplasms without the use of invasive methods and provides a molecular cytogenetic method for detecting and analyzing the type of renal cortical neoplasm present in a renal biopsy sample. The term of these patents runs through 2027. We also have two patent applications for methods and tools for the diagnosis of female gynecological cancers and precancers (US Patent Application No. 61/581,350) and methods and tools for the diagnosis and prognosis of urogenital cancers (US Patent Application No. 61/765,678).

HPV-Associated Cancers. We haveThe Company has three U.S. patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 9,157,129, 8,865,882 and 8,883,414) and an EU patent. These patentsthat cover methods for detecting HPV-associated cancers used in ourits FHACT® test. The term of these patents run through 2031.

FISH Probes. We haveThe Company has two patents covering ourits FISH probes. These patents cover probes and methodologies designed to detect and analyze particular chromosomal translocations (genetic lesions) associated with a wide range of cancers using a technique known as FISH and serve as the backbone for several of ourits other pending patent applications, which are more specifically geared towards other probes (and methodologies). The term of these patents run through 2022.

In addition to patents, we hold sixteenUntil the Business Disposals, the Company held twenty-six U.S. registered trademarks, including a federal registration for the term “CGI” as well as three U.S. trademark applications and one foreign trademark registration for certain of ourits proprietary tests and services. Our strategic useThe Company transferred the ownership of distinctivethese trademarks has garnered increased name recognition and brand awareness for our tests and services withinto the industry.

Through our clinical laboratories, we provide several clinical services that utilize our proprietary trade secrets. In particular, we maintain trade secrets with respect to specimen accessioning, sample preparation, and certain aspects of cytogenetic analysis. All of our trade secrets are kept under strict confidence, and we take all reasonable steps, including the use of non-disclosure agreements and confidentiality agreements, to ensure that our confidential information is not unlawfully disseminated. We also conduct training sessions on the importance of maintaining and protecting trade secrets with our scientific staff and laboratory directors and supervisors.

In addition to our proprietary intellectual property, we exclusively license from University of Southern California, or USC, the use of extraction methodologies and related technologies used in our solid tumor tests, which have been patented in the United States and a number of other jurisdictions, including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Mexico, The Netherlands, Norway, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Currently, this exclusive license includes seven United States patents claiming methods related to this technology. Our USC licensed patents are scheduled to expire between December 2019 and December 2020.

We also entered into nonexclusive licenses with the National Cancer Institute for the use of its intellectual property relatingBuyer, subject to a 3q marker and with Stanford University for use and development of a diagnostic assay and predictive model that has been granted two patents for the stratification and risk prediction for DLBCL patients. Under the terms of theroyalty-free license we are permitted to use the National Cancer Institute’s proprietarysuch intellectual property for use in our patent pending FHACT® DNA probe,six months after following the closing, and subject to its right to request an additional six months, which request has been made. The Company also owns the trademark for the vivoPharm trade name, which is directed to the diagnosis and prognosis of certain HPV-associated cancers.primary revenue-generating business unit.

Operations and Production Facilities

We work with electronic medical records providers
As a preclinical oncology contract research organization (CRO), the Company's leased facilities are built to facilitate seamless communication between our clinical laboratorieshouse immunocompromised animals and specialized models. They incorporate surgical suites, gowning rooms, and holding rooms. In order to ensure an environment of utmost sterility, while also minimizing the oncologist or pathologistworkload by negating dependency on cage-wash infrastructure, the Company relies on its landlords and licensors to manage the vivarium’s at the test ordering site. Currently, we have the ability to integrate with electronic medical record systems, as we have already done with MDL, an electronic medical record provider. We do this integration through utilizing HL7 interfaces, which are standard in health care information technology systems. We currently employ HL7its animal facilities. This allows for its integration with a revenue cycle management company, XIFIN, as well as with its electronic medical records partners such as MDL. The usemore investment of the HL7 interface allows systems written in different languagestime and running on different platforms to be able to talk to each other through the use of an abstracted data layer. This means that we do not have to spend significant extra time designing and developing common communications protocols when integrating with other electronichealth records systems or billing systems providers.energy into scientific endeavors.

When a customer obtains a specimen from a patient for oncology testing, he or she will complete a requisition form (either by hand or electronically, or via electronic medical records technology), and package the specimen for shipment to us. Once we receive the specimen at our laboratory and we enter all pertinent information about the specimen into our clinical laboratory information system, one of our laboratory professionals prepares the specimen for diagnosis. The prepared specimen is sent to

one of our pathologists or medical directors who is experienced in making the diagnosis requested by the referring oncologist or pathologist.

After diagnosis, our pathologist uses our laboratory information systems to prepare a comprehensive report, which includes any relevant images associated with the specimen. Our clinical reporting portal, cgireports.com, allows a referring oncologist or pathologist to access his/her test results in real time in a secure HIPAA compliant manner. The reports are generated in industry standard PDF formats which allows for high definition color images to be reproduced clearly. This portal has been fully operational at our facilities since 2011.

In most cases we provide both the technical analysis and professional diagnosis, although we also fulfill requests from oncologists and pathologists for only one service or the other. If an oncologist or pathologist at the hospital, cancer center, reference laboratory or physician office requires only the analysis, we prepare the data and then return it to the referring oncologist or pathologist for assessment and diagnosis.

Quality Assurance

We are committed to providing reliable and accurate diagnostic services to our customers. Accurate specimen identification, timely communication of diagnoses, and prompt correction of errors, is critical. We monitor and improve our performance through a variety of methods, including performance improvement indicators, proficiency testing (CAP and New York State), external audits and satisfaction surveys. All quality concerns and incidents are subject to root cause analysis and our procedures are put through annual evaluation to ensure that we are providing the best services possible to our patients and customers. Protection of patient results from misuse and improper access is imperative and thus electronic and paper results are guarded via password- protection and identification cards.

We have established a comprehensive Quality Assurance and Management Program for our laboratories designed to drive accurate and timely test results and to ensure the consistent high quality of our testing services. The Quality Assurance and Management Program documents the quality assurance/performance improvement plans and policies and the laboratory quality assurance and quality control procedures that are necessary to ensure that we offer the highest quality of diagnostic testing services. This program is designed to satisfy all the requirements necessary for local and state licensures applicable to our business, including requirements from the New Jersey Health Department, the California Department of Health and the New York Department of Health Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program, and accreditation for clinical diagnostic laboratories by CAP. We follow the policies and procedures for patient and employee safety, hazardous waste disposal and fire codes stated in the general laboratory procedure manual. We believe that all pertinent regulations of CLIA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), Environmental Protection Agency and FDA are satisfied by following the established guidelines and procedures of our Quality Assurance and Management Program.

In addition to the compulsory proficiency programs and external inspections required by CMS and other regulatory agencies, we have developed a variety of internal systems and procedures to emphasize, monitor and continuously improve the quality of our operations. We maintain internal quality controls by routinely processing specimens with known diagnoses in parallel with patient specimens. We also have an extensive, internally administered program of specimen proficiency testing, in which our laboratory staff are blinded to the results.

We participate in numerous externally administered quality surveillance programs and our laboratories are accredited by CAP. The CAP accreditation program involves both unannounced on-site inspections of our laboratories and our participation in CAP’s ongoing proficiency testing program. CAP is an independent, non- governmental organization of board-certified pathologists that accredits laboratories nationwide on a voluntary basis and that has been recognized by CMS as an accreditation organization to inspect laboratories to determine adherence to the CLIA standards. Successful participation in CAP’s proficiency testing program satisfies the CLIA requirement for participation in proficiency testing programs administered by an external source.

Each of our facilities maintains its own quality assurance processes, which are coordinated across sites to maintain consistency in standard operating procedures, employee training and safety manuals.

Third-Party Payor Reimbursement

Depending onUntil the billing arrangement and applicable law, we areBusiness Disposals, the Company was reimbursed for clinical services by:by third-party payors that provideprovided coverage to the patient, such as an insurance company, managed care organization or a governmental payor program;program or from physicians or other authorized parties (such as hospitals or independent laboratories) that orderordered testing serviceservices or otherwise refer the services to us;the Company or directly from the patient. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we derived approximately 20% of our total

revenue from private insurance, including managed care organizations and other health care insurance providers, 14% from Medicare, and 5% from other health care facilities, including hospitals.

Where there is a coverage policy, contract or agreement in place, we bill the third-party payor, the hospital or referring laboratory as well as the patient (for deductibles and coinsurance or copayments, where applicable) in accordance with the policy or contractual terms. Where there is no coverage policy, contract or agreement in place, we pursue reimbursement on behalf of each patient on a case-by-case basis and rely on applicable billing standards to guide our claims. In addition, we have implemented a new patient financial assistance program (CGI MAP Program) that complies with Federal guidelines.

We are reimbursed for three categories of tests: (1) genetic and molecular testing; (2) anatomic pathology and IHC and (3) general immunology and flow cytometry. Reimbursement under the Medicare program for the diagnostic services that we offer is based on either the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) or Medicare Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS), each of which in turn is subject to geographic adjustments and is updated annually. Medical services provided to Medicare beneficiaries that require a degree of physician supervision or other involvement, such as pathology tests, are generally reimbursed under the Medicare PFS, whereas clinical diagnostic laboratory tests are generally reimbursed under the CLFS. Most of the services that we provide are for genetic and molecular testing, which are reimbursed as clinical diagnostic laboratory tests.

Medicare fee schedule amounts for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests are established for each billing code, or CPT code. In addition, for its laboratory fee schedule, Medicare also sets a cap on the amount that it will pay for any individual test. This cap, usually referred to as the National Limitation Amount, is set at a percentage of the median of all the contractor fee schedule amounts for each billing code. In the past, Congress has lowered the percentage of the median used to calculate the National Limitation Amount in order to achieve budget savings. Currently, the National Limitation Amount ceiling is set at 74% of the median for established tests and 100% of the median for certain new tests that were not previously reimbursed. In billing Medicare for clinical laboratory services, we are required to accept, as payment in full, the lowest of our actual charge, the fee schedule amount for the state or local geographical area or the National Limitation Amount. There is currently no copayment or deductible required for tests paid under the CLFS, although Congress periodically has considered implementing such a requirement.

In addition, Congress routinely lowers or eliminates the update factor that would otherwise apply to the applicable CLFS payment. For example, under the health care reform legislation, passed in 2010, payments under the CLFS are reduced by 1.75% through 2015 and, in addition, a productivity adjustment, further reducing payment rates is also imposed. In addition, in February 2012, Congress passed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, which required that the CLFS be “rebased” by -2%. As a result of these changes, for 2015 the CLFS was reduced by -.25%.

Further, in 2014, Congress passed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act or PAMA which also makes significant changes in the way the Medicare will pay for laboratory services. Under PAMA and the final rule, which was issued on June 17, 2016, certain laboratories (including our laboratories that provide clinical services) are required to report the amount that they are paid by private payors for each test beginning in January 2017. CMS will use this data to calculate a weighted median for each test. That new price is to become effective on January 1, 2018, although any resulting reductions will be phased in over time. This data reporting process will be repeated every three years for most tests, although price data for Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (ADLTs) will be reported every year. It is possible that some of our tests could be considered ADLTs, which will require us to report prices annually. In addition, we may also be required to obtain a code from CMS or an entity that it designates for our tests that have not previously had a code. Although CMS was also required to issue a Final Rule implementing PAMA by June 30, 2015, it did not issue a final rule until June 17, 2016. As a result of this delay, many of the statutory deadlines will not be met. It is not known at this time how the implementation of PAMA will affect our reimbursement.

Certain of our tests are paid under the Medicare PFS, rather than the CLFS. Tests paid for under the PFS are based on “relative value units” established for each service. These RVUs are then multiplied by a conversion factor to arrive at a monetary amount. Each year, CMS calculates an update to this conversion factor based on a formula included in the Medicare law, referred to as the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Formula. When it is applied, this SGR formula often would require a decrease in reimbursement unless Congress acts to overturn this result. As a result, Congress consistently passes legislation to prevent implementation of significant cuts that would otherwise be effective. For 2014, CMS had projected the reimbursement cut resulting from the SGR formula would be approximately 20 percent, unless Congress acted to prevent the reduction. On December 18, 2013, Congress passed legislation that enacted a 0.5 percent increase in the conversion factor, which was effective until March 31, 2014. On April 1, 2014, President Obama signed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, or PAMA. PAMA extended the 0.5 percent increase through March 31, 2015 and made other changes to laboratory reimbursement discussed above.


On April 16, 2015, President Obama signed the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which had previously been passed by both houses of Congress. MACRA repealed the provisions related to the Medicare SGR formula and implements a new physician payment system that is designed to reward the quality of care. In addition, it extends the current Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rates through June 2015, and then increases them by 0.5 percent for the remainder of 2015. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the rates will be increased annually by 0.5 percent, through 2019. For 2020 through 2025 payments will be frozen, although payment will be adjusted to account for performance on certain quality metrics under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment Systems (MIPS) or to reflect physician participation in alternative payment models (APMs). For 2026 and subsequent years, qualified APM participants receive an annual 0.75% update on Medicare physician payment rates, while those not participating receive a 0.25% annual payment update, plus any applicable MIPS-based payment adjustments. It is too early to determine how these changes may impact our business.

Medicare also has policies that may limit when we can bill directly for our services and when we must instead bill another provider, such as a hospital. When the testing that we perform is done on a specimen that was collected while the patient was in the hospital, as either an inpatient or outpatient, we may be required to bill the hospital for some of our services, rather than the Medicare program, depending on whether or not the service was ordered more than 14 days after the patient’s discharge from the hospital. These requirements are complex and time- consuming and, depending on what they require, may affect our ability to collect for our services.

Our reimbursement rates from private third-party payors can vary based on whether we are considered to be an “in-network” provider, a participating provider, a covered provider or an “out-of-network” provider. These definitions can vary from insurance company to insurance company, but we are generally considered an “out of network” or non- participating provider in the vast majority of our cases. It is not unusual for a company that offers highly specialized or unique testing to be an “out of network” provider. An “in-network” provider usually has a contracted arrangement with the insurance company or benefits provider. This contract governs, among other things, service-level agreements and reimbursement rates. In certain instances an insurance company may negotiate an “in-network” rate for our testing rather than pay the typical “out-of-network” rate. An “in-network” provider usually has rates that are lower per test than those that are “out-of-network”, and that rate is based on the laboratory fee schedule. The discount rate varies based on the insurance company, the testing type and the often times the specifics of the patient’s insurance plan.

We have contracts with commercial insurance carriers that provide access to certain of our tests. When a test is covered as part of these contracts it is paid at the rate stated in the contract. The Company also has preferred provider agreements and when a claim is processed through one of these organizations, reimbursement is based on usual and customary fees in the specific geography with a discount applied.

In addition, as part of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (“MCTRJCA”), signed into law by President Obama on February 22, 2012, Congress eliminated the special billing rule that had allowed laboratories to bill Medicare for the technical component of certain pathology services furnished to patients of qualifying hospitals. Effective July 1, 2012, independent laboratories, like our laboratories, are required to bill the hospital, rather than the Medicare Program, for the technical component of these services in most instances.

Billing Codes for Third-Party Payor Reimbursement

CPT codes are the main data code set used by physicians, hospitals, laboratories and other health care professionals to report separately-payable clinical laboratory tests for reimbursement purposes. The CPT coding system is maintained and updated on an annual basis by the American Medical Association. Although there is no specific code to report microarrays for oncology, such as our MatBA®-CLL, there are existing codes that describe all of the steps in our MatBA®-CLL testing process. We currently use a combination of different codes to describe the various steps in our testing process. Many of the CPT codes used to bill for molecular pathology tests such as ours have been significantly revised by the CPT Code Editorial Panel. These new codes replace the more general “stacking” codes that were previously used to bill for these services with more test-specific codes, which became effective January 2013. In the CY 2013 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, which was issued in November 2012, CMS stated that it had determined it would pay for the new codes as clinical laboratory tests, which are payable on the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS). CMS also stated that it planned to “gapfill” the new codes; that is, it will ask the contractors to determine a reasonable price for the new codes. This process was completed in 2013, and these tests are now paid for under the new "gapfilled" rates.

Among the new codes that were created by CPT were a specific subset of codes called Multi-analyte Assays with Algorithmic Analysis (MAAAs). These tests typically use an algorithm applied to certain specific components to arrive at a score that is used to predict a particular clinical outcome. CMS recently stated that it will not issue a categorical determination for all MAAA tests, but will consider each individual test that is classified by the CPT as a MAAA on its own merits. On September 25, 2015, CMS

released its Preliminary Determinations for new CPT codes effective in 2016, including several new MAAA CPT codes. CMS had proposed "crosswalking" these codes to an unrelated test, resulting in a significant cut in their reimbursement. However, on November 17, 2015, CMS reversed its policy and directed that the tests be gapfilled by the local contractors. It is expected that when PAMA is fully implemented, many of these MAAA codes will be considered and reimbursed as ADLTs. For 2016, none of our revenue is derived from tests that may be considered MAAAs.

As of January 1, 2014 we are utilizing the “Not Otherwise Classified” (NOC) codes when billing for some of our MAAAtests. The reimbursement policies for the NOC codes vary from payor to payor with regard to specific tests and many of the payors have followed suit. This extends our revenue cycle for these particular tests, where the normal timeframe for reimbursement of a claim is approximately 45-90 days. These tests can take upwards of a year to be reimbursed. There can be no guarantees that Medicare and other payors will establish positive or adequate coverage policies or reimbursement rates in the future. We are moving forward with plans to obtain billing codes for our tests. A specific code for our tests, however, does not assure an adequate coverage policy or reimbursement rate. Please see the section entitled “Legislative and Regulatory Changes Impacting Clinical Laboratory Tests” for further discussion of certain legislative and regulatory changes to these billing codes and the impact on our business.

On October 30, 2015, CMS issued the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule for 2016, which set out policies that were effective January 2016. Among those policy changes are reductions in the payments for flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, two types of tests that we frequently perform. CMS has also stated that certain of these same tests may be considered "misvalued" which means they could be subject to additional scrutiny in the future. The 2017 Physician Fee Schedule Final rule reduced reimbursement rates for flow cytometry by approximately 19%. However, CMS did not finalize its proposal to combine flow cytometry codes 88184 and 88185 into one code. At this time, we are still assessing the potential impact of these changes.

Coverage and Reimbursement for Our Proprietary Tests

We have been able to receive reimbursement for our tests from some payors based on their established policies, including major commercial third-party payors.

The current landscape with payors is generally as follows:

Commercial Third-party Payors and Patient Pay. Where there is a coverage policy in place, we bill the payor and the patient in accordance with the established policy. Where there is no coverage policy in place, we pursue reimbursement on behalf of each patient on a case-by-case basis. Our efforts in obtaining reimbursement based on individual claims, including pursuing appeals or reconsiderations of claims denials, take a substantial amount of time, and bills may not be paid for many months, if at all. Furthermore, if a third-party payor denies coverage after final appeal, payment may not be received at all. We are working to decrease risks of nonpayment by implementing a revenue cycle management system. Third party payors are still establishing payment policies for panel-based tests.

Medicare and Medicaid. We believe that as much as 30% to 40% of our future market for our tests may be derived from patients covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

We cannot predict whether, or under what circumstances, payors will reimburse our proprietary tests. Payment amounts can also vary across individual policies. Denial of coverage by payors, or reimbursement at inadequate levels, would have a material adverse impact on market acceptance of our tests.

Legislative and Regulatory Changes Impacting Clinical Laboratory Tests

From time to time, Congress has revised the Medicare statute and the formulas it establishes for both the Medicare Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS) and the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). The payment amounts under the Medicare fee schedules are important not only for our reimbursement under Medicare, but also because the schedule often is used as a basis for establishing the payment amounts set by other third party payors. For example, state Medicaid programs are prohibited from paying more than the Medicare fee schedule limit for clinical laboratory services furnished to Medicaid recipients.

Under the statutory formula for clinical laboratory fee schedule amounts, increases are made annually based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as of June 30 for the previous twelve-month period. From 2004 through 2008, Congress eliminated the CPI-U update in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. In addition, for years 2009 through 2013, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (“MIPPA”) mandated a 0.5% cut to the CPI-U. Accordingly, the update for 2009 was reduced to 4.5% and negative 1.9% for 2010. In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which, among other things, imposed additional cuts to the Medicare reimbursement for clinical laboratories. The ACA replaced the 0.5% cut enacted by MIPPA with a “productivity

adjustment” that reduced the CPI-U update in payments for clinical laboratory tests. In 2011, the productivity adjustment was -1.2%. In addition, the ACA includes a separate 1.75% reduction in the CPI-U update for clinical laboratories for the years 2011 through 2015. On February 22, 2012, President Obama signed the MCTRJCA, which mandated an additional change in reimbursement for clinical laboratory services payments. This legislation requires CMS to reduce the Medicare clinical laboratory fee schedule by 2% in 2013, which in turn will serve as a base for 2014 and subsequent years. Based on the changes required by ACA and MCTRJCA, payment for clinical laboratory services were reduced by approximately 0.25% for 2015.

With respect to our diagnostic services for which we are reimbursed under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, because of the statutory formula, the “Sustainable Growth Rate” (SGR), the rates would have decreased for the past several years if Congress failed to intervene. In the past, when the application of the statutory formula resulted in lower payment, Congress has passed interim legislation to prevent the reductions. On November 1, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services(CMS) issued its 2013 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule (the “Final Rule”). In the Final Rule, CMS called for a reduction of approximately 26.5% in the 2013 conversion factor that is used to calculate physician reimbursement. However, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which was signed into law on January 2, 2013, prevented this proposed reduction and kept the existing reimbursement rate in effect until December 31, 2013.

For 2014, CMS projected the cut would be about 24%, unless Congress acted. However, on December 18, 2013, Congress passed legislation that enacted a 0.5% update in the conversion factor, which will be effective until March 31, 2014.  On April 1, 2014, President Obama signed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, or PAMA. PAMA extended the 0.5 percent increase through March 31, 2015 and made other changes to laboratory reimbursement discussed below. As discussed above, on April 16, 2015, President Obama signed MACRA, which will replace the SGR process with an alternative payment system.

In addition to the reductions described above, our Medicare payments under both the CLFS and the PFS are also subject to an additional 2% reduction, as a result of “sequestration.” Payments are reduced automatically because the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was created by congress in 2011, was unable to agree on a set of deficit reduction recommendations for Congress to vote on. The reduction is scheduled to continue until 2025.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately 14% and 10%, respectively, of our total revenues are derived from Medicare generally and any changes to the physician fee schedule that result in a decrease in payment could adversely impact our revenues and results of operations.

In addition, periodically CMS also changes its payment policies related to laboratory reimbursement in ways that could have an impact on the revenues of the Company. For example, in 2013 Final Rule, CMS included a reduction of certain relative value units and geographic adjustment factors used to determine reimbursement for a number of commonly used pathology codes, including CPT codes 88300, 88302, 88304, and 88305. In particular, the 2013 Final Rule implemented a cut of approximately 33% in the global billing code for 88305 and a 52% cut in the Technical Component of that code. These codes describe services that we must perform in connection with our tests and we bill for these codes in connection with the services that we provide. In the 2013 Final Rule, CMS also announced how it intended to set prices for the new molecular diagnostic tests, for which the American Medical Association had adopted over 100 new codes. In that Rule, CMS announced it intended to continue to pay for the new molecular codes on the CLFS rather than move them to the Physician Fee Schedule, as some stakeholders had urged. It would then request that the Medicare Administrative Contractors “gapfill” the new codes and set an appropriate price for them. That “gapfilling” process took place over 2013 and CMS announced the new prices for these codes in September, 2013. The median of the prices set by the contractors became the new prices for these codes, effective January 1, 2014.

In the Proposed Physician Fee Schedule Rule for 2014, issued on July 8, 2013, CMS made two proposals that could affect laboratory reimbursement. First, CMS made a proposal to change how it calculates the RVUs used to calculate payments under the PFS. Under this proposal, where a service was paid at a lower rate in the hospital based on the hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) than it is under the PFS, CMS proposed to reduce the RVUs for that service in order to equalize the payment between the two systems. This change, if implemented, would have resulted in approximately a 25% cut in aggregate payments to independent laboratories. In the Final Physician Rule for 2014, however, CMS chose not to implement this proposal, although it stated that it would develop a revised proposal in the future. At this point, it is impossible to know what the impact of such a proposal might be on the Company, were it to be proposed again and finalized.

In addition, in the 2014 Proposed Rule, CMS also noted that payments for many codes paid under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule have not been revised to reflect technological advances that have occurred since the CLFS was first developed in 1984. CMS therefore proposed that it would begin to review all codes on the CLFS and adjust them to reflect technological changes, a process that it expected would take about five years. However, in April of 2014, Congress passed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA), which eliminated CMS’s authority to implement its plan to adjust payments based on technological advances. CMS has since stated it will not implement this proposal.

In PAMA, Congress also changed the way the Medicare will pay for clinical laboratory services. Under PAMA, certain laboratories will be required to report the amount that they are paid by third party payors for each test beginning in January 2016. CMS will use this data to calculate a weighted median for each test. That new price will become effective on January 1, 2018, although reductions will be phased in over time. This data reporting process will be repeated every three years for most tests, although laboratories that offer Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (“ADLTs”) will have to report private payor rates for those tests every year. A test that meets the definition of an ADLT does not automatically become one under PAMA; rather, the laboratory offering the test voluntarily applies for ADLT designation for such a test. It is possible that some of our tests could be considered ADLTs, and if we applied for ADLT designation for such tests, we would be required to report prices for those tests annually. In addition, we may also be required to obtain a code from CMS or an entity that it designates for our tests that have not previously had a unique code. It is not known at this time how these changes will affect our reimbursement. As noted above, because of CMS’s delay in issuing a Final Rule implementing these requirements, not all of the statutory deadlines will be met.

CMS made several other changes in recent Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rules that impact our business. In the CY 2015 rule, CMS implemented a policy that bundles payment for the examination of 10 or more prostate biopsies for an individual patient, rather than paying separately for each individual procedure as had been done previously. This will result in a significant reduction in reimbursement on each of these procedures. That year it also developed new prices for Immunohistochemistry procedures, based on new CPT codes that were developed to describe the procedures. In the CY 2016 final rule, CMS finalized standard times for certain pathology clinical labor tasks, and in the CY 2017 final rule, it said it may adopt standard times for other pathology labor tasks in the future. In 2014, CMS also implemented an edit under its National Correct Coding Initiative, under which it will pay only for a single unit of service when we perform a FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) test. As many FISH tests require two or more probes, this change will also reduce the reimbursement received by the Company.

Further, with respect to the Medicare Program, Congress has proposed on several occasions to impose a 20% coinsurance on patients for clinical laboratory tests reimbursed under CLFS, which would require us to bill patients for these amounts. Because of the relatively low reimbursement for many clinical laboratory tests, in the event that Congress ever were to enact such legislation, the cost of billing and collecting for these services would often exceed the amount actually received from the patient and effectively increase our costs of billing and collecting.

Finally, some of our Medicare claims may be subject to policies issued by Palmetto GBA, the current Medicare Administrative Contractor for North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. In 2013, Palmetto issued a Local Coverage Determination that affects coverage, coding and billing of many molecular diagnostic tests. Under this Local Coverage Determination, Palmetto will not cover any molecular diagnostic tests, including our tests, unless the test is expressly included in a National Coverage Determination issued by CMS or a Local Coverage Determination or coverage article issued by Palmetto. Currently, laboratory providers may submit coverage determination requests to Palmetto for consideration and apply for a unique billing code for each test (which is a separate process from the coverage determination). In the event that a non-coverage determination is issued, the laboratory must wait six months following the determination to submit a new request. In addition, effective May 1, 2012, Palmetto implemented the Molecular Diagnostic Services Program (“MolDx”), under which, among other things, a laboratory must use a newly-assigned unique test identifier when submitting a claim for a molecular test. These unique test identifiers enable Palmetto to measure utilization and apply coverage determinations. Denial of coverage by Palmetto, or reimbursement at inadequate levels, would have a material adverse impact on market acceptance of our tests. Certain other Medicare contractors are also following the policies adopted by Palmetto for molecular diagnostic tests.

Governmental Regulations

ClinicalThe Company's Pennsylvania and Australia research laboratory facilities comply with Good Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988Practices (“GLP”) to the extent required by the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency, USDA, Organization for Economic Co-operation and State Regulation

AsDevelopment (OECD), as well as other international regulatory agencies. Furthermore, the Company's early-stage discovery work, which is not subject to GLP standards, is typically carried out under a diagnostic service provider, wequality management system or internally developed quality systems. The Company's facilities are required to hold certain federal, stateregularly inspected by U.S. and local licenses, certificationsother regulatory compliance monitoring authorities, its clients' quality assurance departments, and permits to conduct our business. As to federal certifications, in 1988, Congress passedits own internal quality assessment program. The Company is also accredited by AAALAC International, a private, nonprofit organization that promotes the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (“CLIA”) establishing quality standards for all laboratories testing to ensure the accuracy, reliability and timeliness of patient test results regardless of where the test was performed. Our U.S.-based laboratories are CLIA accredited. Under CLIA, a laboratory is defined as any facility which performs laboratory testing on specimens derived from humans for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention orhumane treatment of disease, or the impairment of, oranimals in science through voluntary accreditation and assessment of health. CLIA also requires that we hold a certificate applicableprograms. The Company volunteers to the type of work we perform and comply with certain standards. CLIA further regulates virtually all clinical laboratories by requiring they be accredited by the federal government and comply with various operational, personnel, facilities administration, quality and proficiency requirements intended to ensure that their clinical laboratory testing services are accurate, reliable and timely. CLIA compliance and accreditation is also a prerequisite to be eligible to bill for services provided to governmental payor program beneficiaries. CLIA is user-fee funded. Therefore, all costs of administering the program must be covered by the regulated facilities, including certification and survey costs.

We are subject to survey and inspection every two years to assess compliance with program standards, and may be subject to additional unannounced inspections. Laboratories performing high complexity testing are required to meet more stringent requirements than laboratories performing less complex tests. In addition, a laboratory like ours that is certified as “high complexity” under CLIA may obtain analyte specific reagents, which are used as the basis for diagnostic tests that are developed and validated for use in examinations the laboratory performs itself known as laboratory-developed tests (“LDTs”).

In addition to CLIA requirements, we participate in the oversightAAALAC’s program of the College of American Pathologists (“CAP”). Under CMS requirements, accreditation by CAP is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of CLIA. Therefore, because we are accredited by CAP, we are deemeddemonstrate its commitment to also comply with CLIA. CLIA also provides that a state may adopt laboratory regulations that are more stringent than those under federal law,responsible animal care and a number of states have implemented their own more stringent laboratory regulatory schemes. State laws may require that laboratory personnel meet certain qualifications, specify certain quality controls, or prescribe record maintenance requirements.

Asuse, in addition to state laws, our clinical operations at our Rutherford and Los Angeles laboratories are required to meet certain state laboratory licensing and other requirements, which in some areas are more stringent than CLIA. Our laboratories are required hold the required licenses and accreditations obtained from the applicable state agencies in which we operate. State clinical laboratory laws generally require that laboratories and/or laboratory personnel meet certain qualifications. State clinical laboratory laws also generally require laboratories to specify certain quality assurance metrics and to maintain certain records. Several states, including Rhode Island, Florida, Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania, require that clinical laboratories hold licenses to test specimens from patients residing in those states, even though the laboratory is not located in such state. From time to time, other states may require out of state laboratories to obtain licensure in order to accept specimens from the state. If we identify any other state with such requirements or if we are contacted by any other state advising us of such requirements, we intend to follow instructions from the state regulators as to how we should comply with such requirements. In addition, the New York Department of Health separately approves certain LDTs offered in New York State. The Company has obtained the requisite approvals for its LDTs.

Our Rutherford laboratory is licensed and in good standing under the State Departments of Health standards for New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, California, Florida and Maryland . Our Los Angeles laboratory is licensed and in good standing in California, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Florida and Maryland. If we are found to be out of compliance with applicablelocal, state statutory or regulatory standards we may be subject to suspension, restriction or revocation of our laboratory license or assessed civil money penalties. A noncompliant laboratory may also be found guilty of a misdemeanor under applicable state laws. A finding of noncompliance, therefore, may result in harm to our business.and federal laws that regulate animal research.

FDA

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulates the sale or distribution, in interstate commerce, of medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), including in vitro diagnostic test kits, reagents and instruments used to perform diagnostic testing. SuchCertain of such devices must undergo pre-marketpremarket review by FDA prior to commercialization unless the device is of a type exempted from such review by statute or pursuant to FDA’s exercise of enforcement discretion. FDA, to date, has not exercised its authority to actively regulate the development and use of LDTs, such as oursthe Company's, as medical devices and therefore we dothe Company does not believe that ourits LDTs currently require pre-marketpremarket clearance or approval.

Section 1143 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, signed by the President on July 9, 2012, requires FDA to notify Congress at least 60 days prior to issuing a draft or final guidance regulating LDTS and provide details of the anticipated action. On July 31, 2014, FDA notified Congress pursuant to the FDASIA that it intended to issue draft Guidances that would regulate LDTs. On October 3, 2014, the FDA issued two separate draft guidances: “Framework for Regulatory Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)” (“The Framework Draft Guidance”) and “FDA Notification and Medical Device Reporting for Laboratory Developed Tests” (the “Notification Draft Guidance.”). In the Framework Draft Guidance, FDA states that after the Guidances are finalized, it no longer would exercise enforcement discretion with respect to most LDTs and instead would, regulate them in a risk-based manner consistent with the existing classification of medical devices.

The Framework Draft Guidance states that within six months after the Guidances were finalized, all laboratories would be required to give notice to the FDA and provide basic information concerning the nature of the LDTs offered. The FDA then would begin a phased-in review of the LDTs available, based on the risk associated with the tests. For the highest risk LDTs, which the FDA classifies as Class III devices, the Framework Draft Guidance stated that the FDA would begin to require premarket review within 12 months after the Guidance was finalized. Other high risk LDTs would be reviewed over the next four years and then lower risk tests (Class II tests) would be reviewed in the following four to nine years. The Framework Draft Guidance stated that FDA expected to issue a separate Guidance describing the criteria for its risk-based classification 18-24 months after the Guidances were finalized.

On November 18, 2016, the FDA stated that it would not be issuing final guidance on regulation of LDTs and, instead, it would outline its view of an appropriate risk-based approach to LDTs. On January 13, 2017, the FDA released a “Discussion Paper on Laboratory Developed Tests” that synthesizes the feedback that the agency received from various stakeholders on FDA regulation of LDTs “with the hope that it advances public discussion on LDT oversight.” The FDA stated in the introduction to the discussion paper: “The synthesis does not represent the formal thinking of the FDA, nor is it enforceable…This document does not represent a final version of the LDT draft guidance documents that were published in 2014.” Rather, its purpose is to allow for further public discussion and to give Congress a chance to develop a legislative solution. The discussion paper sets forth a prospective oversight framework that would focus on new and significantly modified high- and moderate-risk LDTs and under which LDTs marketed before the effective date of the framework would not be expected to comply with most or all FDA regulatory requirements. Also exempt would be low-risk LDTs, LDTs for rare diseases, and others. Premarket review would be phased in over four years, and those tests introduced between the framework’s effective date and their phase-in date could continue to be offered for clinical use during the period of premarket review. FDA would expand its third-party premarket review program to include LDTs and coordinate with and leverage existing programs, such as New York State’s Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program and the programs run by organizations run by CLIA to accredit laboratories.

As the 115th Congress gets underway, a number of Congressional committees reportedly are working with various stakeholders to consider different approaches to regulation of LDTs. It is unclear at this time whether those committees and stakeholders can reach consensus around an approach and develop legislation and whether Congress would pass any such legislation.

We are monitoring developments in Congress, and in the meantime, we maintain our CLIA accreditation, which permits the use of LDTs for diagnostics purposes.

In addition to the Draft Guidances discussed above, the FDA has taken other actions that could have an impact on our business. In 2013, FDA issued Final Guidance for industry regarding appropriate labeling and distribution practices for in vitro diagnostic products intended for research or investigational use only. FDA’s guidance cautions that labeling or distribution practices that conflict with research or investigational use (e.g., use in clinical diagnostic applications) could subject products shipped with research or investigational use labeling to all applicable requirements of the FDCA as well as enforcement action. As a result of this guidance from the FDA, component suppliers for our LDTs may no longer be willing to distribute components to our clinical laboratory. If this were to occur, we could not produce our LDTs.

On August 6, 2014, the FDA also issued its Final Guidance on In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Devices. According to the Guidance, companion diagnostic devices are in vitro diagnostic devices that provide information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product. The Guidance notes that in most circumstances, FDA expects to approve or clear a companion diagnostic device and its corresponding therapeutic product contemporaneously, based on the label of the therapeutic product. If it were determined that our tests qualified as Diagnostic Devices then we might be required to file for either a 510(k) or a PMA, depending on the nature of the particular test.

Post-market Regulation

OurThe Company's Tissue of Origin® test obtained clearance under section 510(k) of the FDC Act.FDCA. After a device, such as ourits Tissue of Origin® test, is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous and pervasive regulatory requirements continue to apply.

apply once the test is marketed, including FDA’s current good manufacturing practice requirements. Since the Company does not offer its FDA-approved product in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) the Company is not currently subject to post-market regulation in the EEA or any member state. The FDA has broad regulatory compliance and enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that a company has failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:

warning letters, untitled letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of products;

operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;

withdrawingreconsideration of 510(k) clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted;

refusal to grant export approvals for products; and/or


criminal prosecution.


In addition, FDA could publicly issue a safety notice related to ourthe Company's test or request updates to ourits product labeling, including the addition of warnings, precautions, or contraindications.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”)

Under the administrative simplification provisions of HIPAA, as amended by the HITECH Act, the United States Department of Health and Human Services has issued regulations which establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic health care transactions and protecting the privacy and security of Protected Health Information used or disclosed by health care providers and other covered entities. For further discussion of HIPAA and the impact on ourthe Company's business, see the section entitled “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We areits Business-The Company is required to comply with laws governing the transmission, security and privacy of health information that require significant compliance costs, and any failure to comply with these laws could result in material criminal and civil penalties.”

European General Data Protection Regulation

The collection and use of personal health data in the European Union had previously been governed by the provisions of the Data Protection Directive, which has been replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation (“GRPR”) which became effective on May 25, 2018 While the Data Protection Directive did not apply to organizations based outside the EU, the GDPR has expanded its reach to include any business, regardless of its location, that provides goods or services to residents in the EU. This expansion would incorporate the Company's clinical trial activities in EU members states. The GDPR imposes strict requirements on controllers and processors of personal data, including special protections for “sensitive information” which includes health and genetic information of data subjects residing in the EU. GDPR grants individuals the opportunity to object to the processing of their personal information, allows them to request deletion of personal information in certain circumstances, and provides the individual with an express right to seek legal remedies in the event the individual believes his or her rights have been violated. Further, the GDPR imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the United States or other regions that have not been deemed to offer “adequate” privacy protections. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR and the related national data protection laws of the European Union Member States, which may deviate slightly from the GDPR, may result in fines of up to 4% of global revenues, or € 20,000,000, whichever is greater. As a result of the implementation of the GDPR, the Company may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring compliance with the new data protection rules.

The Company's research activities in the EU are currently limited to non-human preclinical studies, and as such, the Company does not collect, store, maintain, process, or transmit any Personal Data (as that term is defined under the GDPR) of trial subjects. However, since the Company currently has three employees located in the EU, its processing and transfer for employee Personal Data is subject to GDPR requirements. The Company has implemented a privacy and security program that is designed to adhere to the requirements of the GDPR in order to protect employee Personal Data, and in the event the Company progresses to research or clinical trials involving humans, to protect participant Personal Data. However, there is significant uncertainty related to the manner in which data protection authorities will seek to enforce compliance with GDPR. For example, it is not clear if the authorities will conduct random audits of companies doing business in the EU, or if the authorities will wait for complaints to be filed by individuals who claim their rights have been violated. Enforcement uncertainty and the costs associated with ensuring GDPR compliance be onerous and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. As a result, the Company cannot predict the impact of the GDPR regulations on its current or future business, either in the US or the EU.

Federal, State and Foreign Fraud and Abuse Laws

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any health care item or service reimbursable under a governmental payor program. The definition of “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including gifts, discounts, credit arrangements, payments of cash, waivers of co-payments, ownership interests and providing anything at less than its fair market value. Recognizing that the Anti-Kickback Statute is broad and may technically prohibit many innocuous or beneficial arrangements within the health care industry, the Department of Health and Human Services has issued a series of regulatory “safe harbors.” These safe harbor regulations set forth certain provisions, which, if met, will assure health care providers and other parties that they will not be prosecuted under the federal Anti- Kickback Statute. Although full compliance with these provisions ensures against prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit within a specific safe harbor does not necessarily mean that the transaction or arrangement is illegal or that prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute will be pursued. For further discussion of the impact of federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws and regulations on ourthe Company's business, see the section entitled “Risk

Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We areits Business-The Company is subject to federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we arethe Company is unable to fully comply with such laws.”

In addition to the administrative simplification regulations discussed above, HIPAA also created two new federal crimes: health care fraud and false statements relating to health care matters. The health care fraud statute prohibits knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from governmental payor programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The false statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from governmental payor programs.

Finally, another development affecting the health care industry is the increased enforcement of the federal False Claims Act and, in particular, actions brought pursuant to the False Claims Act’s “whistleblower” or “qui tam” provisions. The False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity that, among other things, knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal governmental payor program. The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act allow a private individual to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has defrauded the federal government by submitting a false claim to the federal government and permit such individuals to share in any amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement. In addition, various states have enacted false claim laws analogous to the federal False Claims Act, although many of these state laws apply where a claim is submitted to any third-party payor and not merely a governmental payor program. When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties ranging from $10,781approximately $11 thousand to $21,563$22 thousand for each false claim violation that occurred after November 2, 2015.January 15, 2018. (Those whose false claims violations that occurred before November 2, 2015January 15, 2018 could be liable for treble damages plus lower civil penalties ranging from $5,000 to $11,000 per violation.monetary penalties.)

Additionally, in Europe various countries have adopted anti-bribery laws providing for severe consequences, in the form of criminal penalties and/or significant fines, for individuals and/or companies committing a bribery offence.offense. Violations of these anti-bribery laws, or allegations of such violations, could have a negative impact on ourthe Company's business, results of operations and reputation. For instance, in the United Kingdom, under the new Bribery Act 2010, which went into effect in July 2011, a bribery occurs when a

person offers, gives or promises to give a financial or other advantage to induce or reward another individual to improperly perform certain functions or activities, including any function of a public nature. Bribery of foreign public officials also falls within the scope of the Bribery Act 2010. Under the new regime, an individual found in violation of the Bribery Act of 2010 faces imprisonment of up to 10 years. In addition, the individual can be subject to an unlimited fine, as can commercial organizations for failure to prevent bribery.

Physician Referral Prohibitions

Under a federal law directed at “self-referral,” commonly known as the “Stark Law,” there are prohibitions, with certain exceptions, on Medicare and Medicaid payments for laboratory tests referred by physicians who personally, or through a family member, have an investment or ownership interest in, or a compensation arrangement with, the clinical laboratory performing the tests. A person who engages in a scheme to circumvent the Stark Law’s referral prohibition may be fined up to $100,000 for each such arrangement or scheme. In addition, any person who presents or causes to be presented a claim to the Medicare or Medicaid programs in violation of the Stark Law is subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $15,000 per bill submission, an assessment of up to three times the amount claimed and possible exclusion from participation in federal governmental payor programs. Bills submitted in violation of the Stark Law may not be paid by Medicare or Medicaid, and any person collecting any amounts with respect to any such prohibited bill is obligated to refund such amounts. Many states have comparable laws that are not limited to Medicare and Medicaid referrals.

We are also subject to California’s Physician Ownership and Referral Act, or PORA as well as other state laws with self-referral restrictions.

Both the Stark Law and PORA contain an exception for referrals made by physicians who hold investment interests in a publicly traded company that has stockholders’ equity exceeding $75 million at the end of its most recent fiscal year or on average during the previous three fiscal years, and which satisfies certain other requirements. In addition, both the Stark Law and PORA contain an exception for compensation paid to a physician for personal services rendered by the physician. Following our acquisition of Response Genetics in the fourth quarter of 2015, we have compensation arrangements with a number of physicians for personal services, such as speaking engagements and specimen tissue preparation. These arrangements were structured with terms intended to comply with the requirements of the personal services exception to Stark Law and PORA.

However, we cannot be certain that regulators would find these arrangements to be in compliance with Stark Law, PORA or similar state laws. If we are deemed to not be in compliance by the applicable regulators, we would be required to refund any payments we receive pursuant to a referral prohibited by these laws to the patient, the payor or the Medicare program, as applicable.

Corporate Practice of Medicine

NumerousApproximately thirty (30) states have enacted laws prohibiting business corporations, such as us,the Company, from practicing medicine and employing or engaging physicians to practice medicine, generally referred to as the prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine. These laws, which vary among the states that have enacted them, are designed to prevent interference in the medical decision-making process by anyone who is not a licensed physician. Violation of these laws may result in civil or criminal fines, as well as sanctions imposed against usthe Company and/or the professional through licensure proceedings.

Other Regulatory Requirements

OurThe Company's laboratory is subject to federal, state and local regulations relating to the handling and disposal of regulated medical waste, hazardous waste and biohazardous waste, including chemical, biological agents and compounds, blood and bone marrow samples and other human tissue. Typically, we usethe Company uses outside vendors who are contractually obligated to comply with applicable laws and regulations to dispose of such waste. These vendors are licensed or otherwise qualified to handle and dispose of such waste.

OSHA has established extensive requirements relating to workplace safety for health care employers, including requirements to develop and implement programs to protect workers from exposure to blood-borne pathogens by preventing or minimizing any exposure through needle stick or similar penetrating injuries.

Segment and Geographical Information

WeThe Company operateoperates in one reportable business segment and derive revenue from multiple countries, with 96%80% and 95%67% of its continuing operations revenue coming from the United States in fiscal year 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, we2019, the Company had a total of 142approximately 110 full-time employees, and 13 part-timeon January 1, 2020 approximately 75 employees were transferred to IDXG pursuant to the terms of the TSA. The Company therefore retained approximately 35 full time employees, with 133 employees in sales and marketing, 86business development, 27 employees in researchclinical services and development and laboratory operations, 29 employees in quality assurance, client project and data management and logistics and 275 employees in general and administrative. None of ourits employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider ourthe Company considers its employee relations to be good.

Corporate and Available Information

We wereThe Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 8, 1999. On July 16, 2014, wethe Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Gentris Corporation ("Gentris"(“Gentris”), a laboratory specializing in pharmacogenomics profiling for therapeutic development, companion diagnostics and clinical trials. On August 18, 2014 we entered into two agreements by which we acquired BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“BioServe”), a premier genomics services provider serving both the research and clinical markets in India, and as a result of the acquisition, BioServe became a subsidiary of ours. On October 9, 2015, Cancer Geneticsthe Company acquired substantially all the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Response Genetics, Inc. ("Response Genetics") in connection with Response Genetics' filing of a chapter 11 petition for bankruptcy in

On August 18, 2014 the Delaware Bankruptcy Court for approximately $12.9 million, comprised of $7.5 million, in cash, and 788,584 sharesCompany acquired BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“BioServe”). On April 26, 2018, the Company sold BioServe to Reprocell, Inc.

On August 15, 2017, the Company purchased all of the Company's commonoutstanding stock of vivoPharm, with its principal place of business in Victoria, Australia.

On July 5, 2019, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with siParadigm, LLC, pursuant to which the Company sold to siParadigm certain assets associated with the common stock being valued at $5.4 million.Company's clinical laboratory business and agreed to cease operating the Clinical Business. On July 15, 2019, the Company entered into commercial agreements with the Company's senior lenders to divest all of the assets relating to the BioPharma Business.

OurThe Company's principal executive offices are located at 201 Route 17 North, 2nd Floor, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070. OurThe Company's telephone number is (201) 528-9200 and ourthe corporate website address is www.cancergenetics.com. We include ourwww.cancergenetics.com. The Company included the website address in this annual report on Form 10-K only as an inactive textual reference and dodoes not intend it to be an active link to ourthe Company website. The information on ourthe website is not incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K.

This annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as other documents we filethe Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), are available free of charge through the Investors section of ourthe Company website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The public can obtain documents that we filethe Company files with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

This report includes the following trademarks, service marks and trade names owned by us:the Company: MatBA®, UroGenRA®, FHACT®, FReCaD™, Expand Dx™, Summation™, Select One®, DLBCL Complete™, Cervixcyte™, Leuka™, CGI®, CLL Complete®, Focus::NGS™, Focus::Myeloid™, Focus::CLL™, Tissue of Origin®, TOO®, Powered by CGI™ and Empowering Personal Cancer Treatment®. These trademarks, service marks and trade names are the property of Cancer Genetics, Inc. and its affiliates.



Item 1A.Risk Factors.

An investment in the Company's common stock involves a high degree of risk including the risk of a loss of your entire investment. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information contained in this report and the other Company reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The risks set forth below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties may exist that could also adversely affect the Company's business, operations and financial condition. If any of the following risks actually materialize, the Company's business, financial condition and/or operations could suffer. In such event, the value of the Company's common stock could decline, and you could lose all or a substantial portion of the money that you pay for the Company's common stock.

Risks Relating to Ourthe Company's Financial Condition and Capital Requirements

We haveThe Company has a history of net losses; we expectthe Company expects to incur net losses in the future, and wethe Company may never achieve sustained profitability.

We haveThe Company has historically incurred substantial net losses. WeThe Company incurred losses of $15.8$6.7 million and $20.2$20.4 million for fiscal years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. From ourthe Company's inception in April 1999 through December 31, 2016, we2019, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $114.0$164.4 million. We expectThe Company expects losses to continue, principallyonly to the extent that the business does not outpace the public company-related expenses, such as a result oflegal and audit fees and director’s and officer’s liability insurance, and the potential for ongoing research and development expenses and increased sales and marketing costs.losses associated with operating the Discovery Services business. These losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our working capital, total assets and stockholders'stockholders’ equity. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with our research, developmentthe Company's revenue growth and commercialization efforts, we arecosts associated with being a public company, the Company is unable to predict when wethe Company will become profitable, and wethe Company may never become profitable. Even if we dothe Company does achieve profitability, wethe Company may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. OurThe Company's inability to achieve and then maintain profitability would negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

WeThe Company's recurring losses from operations have raised substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

At December 31, 2019, the Company's history of losses required management to assess its ability to continue operating as a going concern, according to ASC 205-40, Going Concern. Even after the Business Disposals, the Company does not project that cash at December 31, 2019 will be sufficient to fund normal operations for the twelve months from the issuance of these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on reduced losses and improved future cash flows. Alternatively, the Company may needbe required to raise additional equity or debt capital, or consummate other strategic transactions. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to fund our existing operations, to develop, validate and commercialize new tests and technologies, to expand our operations and to repay indebtedness.

We may need to raise additional financing to fund our operations, to develop, validate and commercialize new tests and technologies, to expand our operations and to repay indebtedness. At December 31, 2016, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $9.5 million. Net cash used in operating activities was $17.9 million and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

On March 22, 2017, we restructured our debt with Silicon Valley Bank, by repaying the outstanding term loan and entering intocontinue as a new two year $6.0 million asset-based revolving line of credit agreement. We concurrently entered into a new $6.0 million term loan agreement with Partners for Growth, which, on the day of closing, increased our indebtedness from $4.4 million to $6.0 million and, increased our available cash by $1.6 million. We will be able to borrow up to $6.0 million on the revolver, based on a formula tied to eligible accounts receivable, which will increase our indebtedness dollar for dollar. In connection with such debt restructuring we issued warrants to such lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common stock.

We believe that our current cash and availability under our revolving line of credit will support operations for at least 12 months from the date of this report. Wegoing concern. The Company can provide no assurancesassurance that anythese actions will be successful or that additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company's ability to satisfy claims of all when needed. Our forecastits creditors in full is uncertain.

While in connection with the closing of the periodBioPharma Disposal, the SVB ABL and the PFG Term Note were terminated, and all related liens were released, the Company remains liable to various unsecured creditors, including in the amount of time through which our$100 thousand due to NovellusDx, Ltd. (“NDX”) as of the date of this Form 10-K, in connection with its October 2019 NDX Settlement Agreement, and the principal amount of $1.3 million, plus interest due to Atlas Sciences, LLC pursuant to its one-year October 2019 unsecured note. At December 31, 2019, other than those of discontinuing operations, the Company had an aggregate of $5.7 million of current financial resourcesliabilities and $6.3 million in total liabilities. This is compared to current assets other than those of discontinuing operations of $7.1 million, as of December 31, 2019. However, at December 31, 2019, the Company has an additional $1.2 million of liabilities associated with discontinuing operations that will be adequatefunded primarily from the Company's continuing operations. No assurances can be given that the Company will be able to support our operations andpay such unsecured creditors in full or that claims will not be asserted in addition to the costs to support our general and administrative, sales and marketing and research and development activitiesamounts which the Company believes it is liable for at this time.

The Company’s additional sources of funds are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties.
uncertain.

Additional financing may be
The Company has three sources of potential cash receipts following the Business Disposals, with only the third, the proceeds from the Discovery Business, being material. First, as part of the sale of equity or convertible or other debt securitiesthe Clinical Business to siParadigm, the Company is receiving earn-out payments based on the revenues of siParadigm from the former customers of the Company’s Clinical Services business. Such earn-out payments are based on revenues generated in a public or private offering,the 12 months following the closing of the sale of the Clinical Services business, and are to be paid over 24 months following such sale. While the Company received net payments of approximately $156 thousand from an additional or new credit facility orsiParadigm in the July through December 2019 period, the monthly payments from a strategic partnership coupled with an investment in us or a combinationsiParadigm have decreased since the end of forms. We continue to evaluate our operationsthe third quarter of 2019, and take steps to improve our operating cash flow. We can provide no assurances can be given with respect to the amount and timing of any further payments. Second, the Company is attempting to collect on certain accounts receivable it owns that our current actions will be successfulwere not sold to siParadigm or that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all, when needed. Furthermore, certain provisions of the securities purchase agreements we entered into in May 2016 and September 2016, may limit our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, including a prohibition on entering into variable rate transactions, such as an equity line, while the 5-year warrants issued in May and September 2016 remain outstanding, and rights of the investors to participate in future financings in anIDXG. The net amount of upsuch accounts receivable expected to 50%be collected as of such financing. Our failure to raise additional capital and in sufficient amounts when needed may significantly impact our ability to operate our business. For further discussion of our liquidity requirements, see the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources-Capital Resources and Expenditure Requirements.”December 31, 2019 was approximately $71 thousand.

We also may needThird, the Company continues to raise capitalown its Discovery Business through its vivoPharm subsidiary. For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2019, the Company had a net loss from continuing operations of $6.9 million, had cash used in continuing operations of $3.2 million and $7.3 million in revenues from the Discovery Business. No assurances can be given as to expand our business to meet our long-term business objectives, including to:
increase our saleswhether the Company will ever be profitable, and marketing efforts to drive market adoption and address competitive developments;
fund development, validation and marketing efforts of current and future tests;
comply with current and evolving regulatory requirements;
further expand our clinical laboratory operations;
expand our technologies into other types of cancer;
acquire, license or invest in technologies;

acquire or invest in complementary businesses or assets; and
finance capital expenditures and general and administrative expenses.

Our present and future funding requirements and our forecast ofthere are substantial doubts about the period of time through which our current financial resources will be adequate to support our operations will depend on many factors, including:
our ability to achieve revenue growth;
ourCompany's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. If the Company is not able to improve our operational efficiency;
our ability to developremediate the material weakness and obtain approvals for our new diagnostic testsotherwise maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, the reliability of its financial reporting, investor confidence in the Company and the costs associated withvalue of its common stock could be adversely affected.

As a public company, the Company is required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such researchinternal controls. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("Section 404"), requires that the Company evaluate and development activities;determine the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and provide a management report on internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
our ability
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to execute on our marketingcontrols over accounting for foreign currency exchange rate. As a result, a non-cash adjustment had to be recorded to correct the error identified during the 2019 audit procedures. In addition, the Company identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to controls over accounting for the fair value of an investment held by the Company. As a result, a non-cash adjustment had to be recorded to correct the error identified during the 2019 audit procedures. The Company has begun the process of implementing changes to its internal control over financial reporting to remediate the control deficiencies that gave rise to the material weakness, including further improvements in its processes and sales strategyanalyses that support the accounting for our tests and gain acceptanceforeign currency exchanges. The Company expects this deficiency to be corrected by the end of our teststhe second quarter of 2020.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company identified a continued material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to controls over accounting for uncollectible Clinical Services revenue. This material weakness in the market;
our abilityCompany's revenue and cash receipts process continued in 2018 as remediation efforts were not adequate. As a result, additional amounts had to obtain adequate reimbursement from governmentalbe recorded as bad debt expense for older balances. Based on a change in financial leadership in late November 2018, the Company has demonstrated a commitment to remediate the material weakness in a timely fashion. The Company had noted the need for additional corporate accounting and other third-party payors for our testsfinancial personnel, supplemented by external resources as appropriate, with the requisite skill and services;
technical expertise. This deficiency was ultimately corrected by the costs, scope, progress, results, timing and outcomesdisposal of the clinical trialsClinical Business in July 2019.

If the Company's steps are insufficient to successfully remediate the material weaknesses and otherwise establish and maintain an effective system of our diagnostic tests;
internal control over financial reporting, the costsreliability of operating and enhancing our laboratory facilities;
its financial reporting, investor confidence in the costs of additional general and administrative personnel;
the timing ofCompany and the costs involvedvalue of its common stock could be materially and adversely affected. Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for the Company to provide reliable and timely financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to reasonably detect and prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in regulatory compliance, particularlytheir implementation could cause the Company to fail to meet its reporting obligations. For as long as the Company is a “smaller reporting company” under the U.S. securities laws, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting could detect problems that management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting could lead to financial statement restatements and require the Company to incur the expense of remediation.


Moreover, the Company does not expect that disclosure controls or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Failure of its control systems to prevent error or fraud could materially adversely impact the regulations relatingCompany.

The Company’s business operations are more limited than prior to laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”) change;
the timingsale of its Clinical Services business and costs involved in regulatory compliance, particularly if the regulations relating the PPACA (Patient Protectionsale of its BioPharma Services business, and Affordable Care Act) change;
thus the costs of maintaining expandingitself as a publicly traded corporation are proportionally higher as a percentage of total revenue and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, including potential litigation costs and liabilities;
will be more burdensome to the effect of competing technological and market developments;
costs related to international expansion; and
our ability to secure financing and the amount thereof.

The various ways we could raise additional capital carry potential risks. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to our stockholders could result. Any equity securities issued also could provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we raise funds by issuing debt securities, those debt securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. The terms of debt securities issued or borrowings pursuant to a credit agreement could impose significant restrictions on our operations and increase our interest expense. If we raise funds through collaborations and licensing arrangements, we might be required to relinquish significant rights to our technologies or tests, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Additional equity or debt financing might not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. If we cannot secure additional funding when needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more research and development programs or sales and marketing initiatives. In addition, we may have to work with a partner on one or more of our development programs, which could lower the economic value of those programs to us.

Our outstanding warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of shares of our common stockCompany going forward.

As a public company, the Company has incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of March 22, 2017, we had issuedthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the other rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and the rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq. Compliance with the various reporting and other requirements applicable to public companies requires considerable time and attention of management. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules of the SEC and national securities exchanges have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls. Management and other personnel are devoting and will continue to need to devote a substantial amount of time and money to these compliance obligations. The board may view these costs to be disproportionately expensive when viewed in light of the Company's reduced revenues and overall operations following the Business Disposals.

As a result, the board of directors may elect to pursue a strategic transaction to attempt to expand the business and create additional value for shareholders, or in light of the time, costs and uncertainties inherent in seeking such a strategic transaction, and the costs in remaining as a public company, the Company's board may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation of the Company. If the Company's board of directors were to approve and recommend, and the Company's stockholders were to approve, a dissolution and liquidation of the Company, the Company would be required under Delaware corporate law to pay the Company's outstanding warrantsobligations, as well as to purchase 7,475,961 sharesmake reasonable provision for contingent and unknown obligations, prior to making any distributions in liquidation to the Company's stockholders. The Company's commitments and contingent liabilities may include severance obligations related to the recent asset sales. As a result of ourthis requirement, a portion of the Company's assets may need to be reserved pending the resolution of such obligations. If a dissolution and liquidation were pursued, the board of directors, in consultation with its advisors, would need to evaluate these matters and make a determination about a reasonable amount to reserve. Accordingly, holders of the Company's common stock atcould lose all or a weighted-average exercise pricesignificant portion of $4.61 per share,their investment in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company.

Management may have conflicts of interest.

Current management of the Company, principally its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Company, including warrantsplanning for the future direction of the Company after the Business Disposals. Such officers may enter into consulting agreements with Buyer (and, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, siParadigm) and have been assisting in the transition of the Clinical Business and BioPharma Business to purchase 2,869,801 sharessiParadigm and IDXG, as applicable. It is possible that the dual roles will create conflicts of our common stock at a price of $2.25 per share and warrants to purchase 443,262 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.82 per share. We also have outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 2,532,734 shares of our common stock. The sale, or even the possibility of sale, and the uncertaintyinterest for such officers with respect to allocation of their time and otherwise. No assurance can be given that the timing of any sales,officers of the shares underlying these securities, particularlyCompany will have sufficient time and resources to properly direct the warrants, could have an adverse effect onfuture operations of the market priceCompany, or that other conflicts of our common stock and on our ability to obtain future financing at prices we deem satisfactory, or at all. If and to what extent these warrants and/or options are exercised, you may experience dilution to your holdings.interest in their dual roles will not arise.

Risks Relating to Ourthe Company's Business and Strategy

If we arethe Company is unable to increase sales, of our laboratory tests and services or to successfully develop and commercialize other proprietary tests, ourthe Company revenues will be insufficient for us to achieve profitability.

WeThe Company currently derivederives substantially all of our revenues from ourtesting services, laboratory testing services. We have only recently begun offering our proprietary Focus::NGS® panels through our CLIA-certified, CAP-accreditedservices and state licensed laboratories. We are in varying stages of research and development for other diagnostic tests that we may offer.


In recent years, we also have begun to provide our Biopharma Services. BiopharmaCRO at the premarket stage. Discovery Services are services that include proprietary preclinical test systems supporting clinical diagnostic and tests provided toprognostic offerings at early stages, supporting the pharmaceutical and biotechindustry, biotechnology companies and clinicalacademic research organizations in connection with phase I, phase II or phase III studies forcenters. In particular, the Company's preclinical development of therapeutic drugs. The naturebiomarker detection methods, response to immuno-oncology directed novel treatments and early prediction of these servicesclinical outcome is that they tend to come in relatively large projects but episodically, rather than providing steady sourcessupported by the Company's extended portfolio of revenues.orthotopic, xenografts and syngeneic tumor test systems. It is unclear at this stage of our development whether wethe Company will be able to maintain and grow the number of pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations who will avail themselves of our services, or how regular a flow of drug development projects we will be able to obtain from existing customers.the Company's services.

If we arethe Company is unable to increase sales of our laboratory tests and services, or to successfully develop, validate and commercialize other diagnostic tests, wethe Company will not produce sufficient revenues to become profitable.

If pathologists
The Company's business is subject to risks arising from epidemic diseases, such as the recent global outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus.

The recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, which has been declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic, has spread across the globe and oncologists decideis impacting worldwide economic activity. A pandemic, including COVID-19 or other public health epidemic, poses the risk that the Company or its employees, contractors, suppliers, courier delivery services and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities for an indefinite period of time, including due to spread of the disease within these groups or due to shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. While it is not possible at this time to estimate the impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company's business, the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation measures have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on global economic conditions which could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and financial condition, including impairing the ability to raise capital when needed.

The continued spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken by the governments of countries affected could disrupt the supply chain of material needed for the Company's Discovery Services and could delay future projects from commencing due to COVID-19 related impacts on the demand for Company services and therefore have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Company's corporate and accounting functions are located in New Jersey and are currently subject to a shelter-in-place mandate. The Company's U.S. based preclinical laboratory is located in Pennsylvania and is subject to a stay-at-home order, our diagnostic tests and/and many customers worldwide are similarly impacted. As a healthcare provider, the Company is allowed to remain open in compliance with the shelter-in-place and stay-at-home mandates and continue to provide critical services in the development of new therapies and the fight against cancer. The Company is still providing Discovery Services, and has yet to experience a slowdown in project work as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the future of many projects may be delayed. The global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve, and the extent to which COVID-19 may impact business, results of operations and financial position will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease.

If pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations decide not to use our diagnostic tests andthe Company's preclinical CRO services in connection with their clinical trials, wethe Company may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to sustain ourthe Company's business.

To generate demand for our Clinical Services, we will need to educate oncologists and pathologists on the clinical utility, benefits and value of each type of test we provide through published papers, presentations at scientific conferences and one-on-one education sessions by members of our sales force. In addition, we will need to assure oncologists and pathologists of our ability to obtain and maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. To generate demand for our Biopharma Services andits Discovery Services, we needthe Company needs to educate pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations on the utility of ourthe Company's tests and services to improve the outcomes of clinical trials for new oncology drugs and more rapidly advance targeted therapies through the clinical development process through published papers, presentations at scientific conferences and one-on-one education sessions by members of ourthe Company's sales force. WeThe Company may need to hire additional commercial, scientific, technical and other personnel to support this process. If wethe Company cannot convince medical practitioners, pharmaceutical and biotech companies or clinical research organizations to order ourits diagnostic tests or other future tests we develop, wethe Company develops, the Company will likely be unable to create demand for our tests in sufficient volume for usit to achieve sustained profitability.

OurThe potential loss or delay of the Company's large contracts or of multiple contracts could adversely affect results.

Most of the Company's Discovery Services customers can terminate the contracts upon 30 to 90 days’ notice. These customers may delay, terminate or reduce the scope of the contracts for a variety of reasons beyond the Company's control, including but not limited to:

decisions to forego or terminate a particular clinical trial;
lack of available financing, budgetary limits or changing priorities;
failure of products being tested to satisfy safety requirements or efficacy criteria;
unexpected or undesired clinical results for products; or
shift of business to a competitor or internal resources.

As a result, contract terminations, delays and alterations are a possible outcome in the Company's Discovery Services business. In the event of termination, the contracts often provide for fees for winding down the project, but these fees may not be sufficient for the Company to maintain margins, and termination may result in lower resource utilization rates. In addition, the Company may not realize the full benefits of the backlog of contractually committed services if customers cancel, delay or reduce their commitments under the Company's contracts with them, which may occur if, among other things, a customer decides to shift its

business to a competitor or revoke the Company's status as a preferred provider. Thus, the loss or delay of a large contract or the loss or delay of multiple contracts could adversely affect Company revenues and profitability. The Company believes the risk of loss or delay of multiple contracts potentially has greater effect where the Company is party to broader partnering arrangements with global biopharmaceutical companies.

The Company's quarterly operating results may be subject to significant fluctuations and may be difficult to forecast.

In recent years, we have been expanding our Biopharma Services business. The nature of these services is that they tend to come in relatively large projects but episodically, rather than providing steady sources of revenues. The timing, size and duration of ourthe Company's contracts with pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations depend on the size, pace and duration of such customer'scustomer’s clinical trial, over which we havethe Company has no control and sometimes limited visibility. In addition, our expense levels are based, in part, on expectation of future revenue levels. A shortfall in expected revenue could, therefore, result in a disproportionate decrease in ourthe Company's net income. As a result, our quarterly operating results may be subject to significant fluctuations and may be difficult to forecast.

The commercial success of our Clinical Services business could be compromised if third-party payors, including insurance companies, managed care organizations and Medicare, do not provide coverage and reimbursement, breach, rescind or modify their contracts or reimbursement policies or delay payments for our molecular diagnostic tests.

Pathologists and oncologists may not order our molecular diagnostic tests unless third-party payors, such as insurance companies, managed care organizations and government payors, such as Medicare and Medicaid, pay a substantial portion of the test price. Coverage and reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend on a number of factors, including a payor's determination that tests using our technologies are:

not experimental or investigational;
medically necessary;
appropriate for the specific patient;
cost-effective;
supported by peer-reviewed publications; and
included in clinical practice guidelines.

Uncertainty surrounds third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of any test incorporating new technology, including tests developed using our NGS panels. Technology assessments of new medical tests and devices conducted by research centers and other entities may be disseminated to interested parties for informational purposes. Third-party payors and health care providers may use such technology assessments as grounds to deny coverage for a test or procedure.


Because each payor generally determines for its own enrollees or insured patients whether to cover or otherwise establish a policy to reimburse our diagnostic tests, seeking payor approvals is a time-consuming and costly process. We cannot be certain that coverage for our tests will be provided in the future by additional third-party payors or that existing contracts, agreements or policy decisions or reimbursement levels will remain in place or be fulfilled under existing terms and provisions. If we cannot obtain coverage and reimbursement from private and governmental payors such as Medicare and Medicaid for our current tests, or new tests or test enhancements that we may develop in the future, our ability to generate revenues from our clinical services could be limited, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Further, we have experienced in the past, and will likely experience in the future, delays and temporary interruptions in the receipt of payments from third-party payors due to missing documentation and other issues, which could cause delay in collecting our revenue.

If we are unable to successfully validate our laboratory tests and services, we will not be able to increase revenues.

Pathologists and oncologists may not order our proprietary tests, and third-party payors may not reimburse for our tests, unless we are able to provide compelling evidence that the tests are useful to patient treatment and produce actionable information with respect to the diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis of the various cancers on which our work is focused. In addition, pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations may not order our proprietary tests unless we are able to provide compelling evidence that such tests improve the outcomes of clinical trials for new oncology drugs and allow pharmaceutical and biotech companies to more rapidly advance targeted therapeutics. While we have validated all of the tests that we currently offer, we believe that we will need to finance and successfully complete additional and more powerful studies, and then effectively disseminate the results of those studies, to drive widespread adoption of our tests and thereby increase our revenues.
If the market for our tests andthe Company's services does not experience significant growth or if our tests and services do not achieve broad acceptance, our operations will suffer.

WeThe Company cannot accurately predict the future growth rate or the size of the market for our tests andthe Company's services. The expansion of this market depends on a number of factors, such as:

the results of clinical trials;
the cost, performance and reliability of our tests andthe Company's services, and the tests and services offered by competitors;

customers' perceptions regarding the benefits of our tests andthe Company's services;

customers' satisfaction with our tests andthe Company's services; and

marketing efforts and publicity regarding our tests andthe Company's services.

The Company's financial results may be adversely affected if it underprices contracts, overruns cost estimates or fails to receive approval for or experience delays in documenting change orders.

Most of the Discovery Services contracts are either fee for service contracts or fixed-fee contracts. The Company's past financial results have been, and future financial results may be, adversely impacted if the Company initially underprices contracts or otherwise overrun cost estimates and is unable to successfully negotiate a change order. Change orders can occur when the scope of work the Company performs needs to be modified from that originally contemplated by the contract with the customer and are typically treated as new projects. Modifications can occur, for example, when there is a change in a key clinical trial assumption or parameter or a significant change in timing. Where the Company is not successful in converting out-of-scope work into change orders under current contracts, the Company bears the cost of the additional work. Such underpricing, significant cost overruns or delay in documentation of change orders could have a material adverse effect on business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

If wethe Company fails to perform the services in accordance with contractual requirements, regulatory standards and ethical considerations, the Company could be subject to significant costs or liability and the Company's reputation could be harmed.

In connection with the Discovery Services business, the Company contracts with biopharmaceutical companies to provide specialized services to assist them in planning and conducting unique, specialized studies to guide drug discovery and development programs with a concentration in oncology and immuno-oncology. The Company's services include monitoring clinical trials, data and laboratory analysis, electronic data capture and other related services. Such services are complex and subject to contractual requirements, regulatory standards and ethical considerations. If the Company fails to perform the services in accordance with these requirements, regulatory agencies may take action against the Company for failure to comply with applicable regulations governing clinical trials. Customers may also bring claims against the Company for breach of contractual obligations. Any such action could have a material adverse effect on results of operations, financial condition and reputation.

Such consequences could arise if, among other things, the following occur:

Improper performance of the Company's services. The performance of clinical development services is complex and time-consuming. For example, the Company may make mistakes in conducting a clinical trial that could negatively impact or obviate the usefulness of the clinical trial or cause the results of the clinical trial to be reported improperly. If the clinical trial results are compromised, the Company could be subject to significant costs or liability, which could have an adverse impact on the ability to perform services. As examples:

non-compliance generally could result in the termination of ongoing clinical trials or sales and marketing projects or the disqualification of data for submission to regulatory authorities;

compromise of data from a particular clinical trial, such as failure to verify that informed consent was obtained from patients, could require the Company to repeat the clinical trial under the terms of the contract at no further cost to the customer, but at a substantial cost to the Company; and

breach of a contractual term could result in liability for damages or termination of the contract.

While the Company endeavors to contractually limit exposure to such risks, improper performance of the Company's services could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, damage reputation and result in the cancellation of current contracts by or failure to obtain future contracts from the affected customer or other customers.

Investigation of customers. From time to time, one or more of the Company's customers are audited or investigated by regulatory authorities or enforcement agencies with respect to regulatory compliance of their clinical trials, programs or the marketing and sale of their drugs. There is a risk that either the Company's customers or regulatory authorities could claim that the Company performed services improperly or that the Company is responsible for clinical trial or program compliance. If the Company's customers or regulatory authorities make such claims against the Company and prove them, the Company could be subject to damages, fines or penalties. In addition, negative publicity regarding regulatory compliance of customers’ clinical trials, programs or drugs could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and reputation.

Business or economic disruptions or global health concerns could seriously harm the Company's development efforts and increase costs and expenses.

Broad-based business or economic disruptions could adversely affect the Company's business and ongoing or planned research and development activities of customers. For example, in December 2019 an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus originated in Wuhan, China and has since spread to a number of other countries, including the United States. To date, this outbreak has already resulted in extended shutdowns of certain businesses in the Wuhan region and has had ripple effects to businesses around the world. Global health concerns, such as coronavirus, could also result in social, economic, and labor instability in the countries in which the Company or Company customers operate. The Company cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if the Company or any of its customers, suppliers, regulators and other third parties with whom the Company conducts business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, the ability to conduct business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively impacted. It is also possible that global health concerns such as this one could disproportionately impact the healthcare-related facilities in which Company customers conduct studies, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operation and financial condition.

If the Company is unable to manage growth in our business, our prospects may be limited and ourthe Company's future results of operations may be adversely affected.

We intendThe Company intends to continue with our research and development activities, our sales and marketing programs and other activities as needed to meet future demand. Any significant expansion may strain our managerial, financial and other resources. If we arethe Company is unable to manage such growth, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. WeThe Company will need to improve continually ourthe operations, financial and other internal systems to manage its growth effectively, and any failure to do so may lead to inefficiencies and redundancies, and result in reduced growth prospects and diminished operational results.

Our business depends on our ability to successfully commercialize novel cancer diagnostic tests and services, which is time consuming and complex, and our development efforts may fail.

Our current business strategy focuses on discovering, developing and commercializing molecular, genomic and genetic diagnostic tests and services. We believe the success of our business depends on our ability to fully validate and commercialize our existing diagnostic tests and services and to develop and commercialize new diagnostic tests. We have multiple tests we are currently offering and in development, but research, development and commercialization of diagnostic tests is time-consuming, uncertain and complex.

Tests we currently offer in our laboratory, or any additional technologies that we may develop, may not succeed in reliably diagnosing or predicting the recurrence of cancers with the sensitivity and specificity necessary to be clinically useful, and thus may not succeed commercially. In addition, prior to or an in continuing in conjunction with commercializing our diagnostic tests, we must undertake time-consuming and costly development activities, including clinical studies, and obtain regulatory

clearance or approval, which may be denied. This development process involves a high degree of risk, substantial expenditures and will occur over several years. Our development efforts may fail for many reasons, including:
failure of the tests at the research or development stage;
difficulty in accessing archival tissue samples, especially tissue samples with known clinical results; or
lack of sufficient clinical validation data to support the effectiveness of the test.

Tests that appear promising in early development may fail to be validated in subsequent studies, and even if we achieve positive results, we may ultimately fail to obtain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals. There is substantial risk that our research and development projects will not result in commercial tests, and that success in early clinical trials will not be replicated in later studies. At any point, we may abandon development of a test or be required to expend considerable resources repeating clinical trials, which would adversely impact the timing for generating potential revenues from that test. In addition, as we develop tests, we will have to make significant investments in research, development and marketing resources. If a clinical validation study of a particular test then fails to demonstrate the outlined goals of the study, we might choose to abandon the development of that test. Further, our ability to develop and launch diagnostic tests will likely depend on our receipt of additional funding. If our discovery and development programs yield fewer commercial tests than we expect, we may be unable to execute our business plan, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

WeThe Company may acquire other businesses or form joint ventures or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute ourits stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt or cause usthe Company to incur significant expense.

As part of ourthe Company's business strategy, wethe Company may pursue other mergers or acquisitions of businesses and assets. We also may pursue strategic alliances and joint ventures that leverage our core technology and industry experience to expand our offerings or distribution. For example, wethe Company acquired vivoPharm in 2017, Response Genetics, Inc. in 2015 and Gentris Corporation in 2014, and we entered into a joint venture in May 2013 with Mayo Foundation for Education and Research. We haveThe Company subsequently shut down Response Genetics operations in California and moved them to New Jersey and North Carolina and in February 2020 completed the commitments thereby ending the need for the Company's joint venture with Mayo. The Company also purchased a business in India in August 2014 which was sold in April 2018. The Company also sold the Clinical Business and BioPharma Business in two transactions in July 2019 (the “Business Disposals”). The Company has developed experience with acquiring other companies and forming strategic alliances and joint ventures. WeThe Company may not be able to find suitable partners or merger or acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete such transactions on favorable terms, if at all. If we makethe Company makes any acquisitions, we

the Company may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could assume unknown or contingent liabilities. Any future acquisitions also could result in significant write-offs or the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Integration of an acquired company also may disrupt ongoing operations and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. WeThe Company may experience losses related to investments in other companies, which could have a material negative effect on ourthe results of operations. WeThe Company may not identify or complete these transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, technology license, strategic alliance or joint venture.

To finance any mergers or acquisitions, or joint ventures, wethe Company may choose to issue shares of our common stock as consideration, which would dilute the ownership of ourits stockholders. If the price of ourthe Company's common stock is low or volatile, wethe Company may not be able to acquire other companies or fund a joint venture project using our stock as consideration. Alternatively, it may be necessary for usthe Company to raise additional funds for acquisitions through public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us,the Company, or at all.

We conduct business in a heavily regulated industry, and if we are unable to obtain regulatory clearance or approvals in the United States, if we experience delays in receiving clearance or approvals, or if we do not gain acceptance from other laboratories of any cleared or approved diagnostic tests at their facilities, our growth strategy may not be successful.

We currently offer our proprietary tests in conjunction with our comprehensive panel of laboratory services in our CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited laboratory. Because we currently offer these tests and services solely for use within our laboratory, we believe we may market the tests as laboratory developed tests (LDTs), which are tests designed, manufactured and used within a single laboratory. Although the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has statutory authority to assure that medical devices, including LDTs, are safe and effective for their intended uses, the FDA has generally exercised its enforcement discretion and not enforced applicable regulations with respect to LDTs. Specifically, under current FDA enforcement policies and guidance, LDTs generally do not require FDA premarket clearance or approval before commercialization, and we have marketed our LDTs on that basis. While we believe that we are currently in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations as historically enforced by the FDA, we cannot assure you that the FDA will agree with our determination, and a determination that we have violated these laws and regulations, or a public announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations, could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.


If we were to offer our tests through third-party laboratories, these tests would most likely not be subject to the FDA's current exercise of enforcement discretion over LDTs, and would be subject to the applicable medical device regulations. For example, these tests could become subject to the FDA's requirements for premarket review. Unless an exemption applies, generally, before a new medical device or a new use for a medical device may be sold or distributed in the United States, the medical device must receive either FDA clearance of a 510(k) pre-market notification or pre-market approval. As a result, before we can market or distribute our tests in the United States for use by other clinical testing laboratories, we must first obtain pre-market clearance or pre-market approval from FDA. We have not yet applied for clearance or approval from FDA, and would need to complete additional validations before we are ready to apply. We believe it would likely take two years or more to conduct the studies and trials necessary to obtain approval from FDA to commercially launch any of our proprietary products outside of our clinical laboratory. Once we do apply, we may not receive FDA clearance or approval for the commercial use of our tests on a timely basis, or at all. If we are unable to obtain clearance or approval or if clinical diagnostic laboratories do not accept our tests, our ability to grow our business by deploying our tests could be compromised.

The Federal Food and Drug Administration may impose additional regulatory obligations and costs upon our business.

On October 3, 2014 the FDA issued two draft guidance documents regarding its intent to modify its policy of enforcement discretion and increase oversight over LDTs. The two draft guidance documents are entitled “Framework for Regulatory Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)” (the “Framework Draft Guidance”) and “FDA Notification and Medical Device Reporting for Laboratory Developed Test (LDTs)" (the "Notification Draft Guidance”). In the Framework Draft Guidance, FDA stated that after the Guidances are finalized, it no longer would exercise enforcement discretion with respect to most LDTs and instead would regulate them in a risk-based manner consistent with the existing classification of medical devices. The Framework Draft Guidance stated that within six months after the Guidances were finalized, all laboratories would be required to give notice to the FDA and provide basic information concerning the nature of the LDTs offered. The FDA then would begin a phased-in review of the LDTs available, based on the risk associated with the tests. For the highest risk LDTs, which the FDA classifies as Class III devices, the Framework Draft Guidance stated that the FDA would begin to require premarket review within 12 months after the Guidance was finalized. Other high risk LDTs would be reviewed over the next four years and then lower risk tests (Class II tests) would be reviewed in the following four to nine years. The Framework Draft Guidance stated that FDA expected to issue a separate Guidance describing the criteria for its risk-based classification 18-24 months after the Guidances were finalized.

On November 18, 2016, the FDA stated that it would not be issuing final guidance on regulation of LDTs and, instead, it would outline its view of an appropriate risk-based approach to LDTs. On January 13, 2017, the FDA released a “Discussion Paper on Laboratory Developed Tests” that synthesizes the feedback that the agency received from various stakeholders on FDA regulation of LDTs “with the hope that it advances public discussion on LDT oversight.” The FDA stated in the introduction to the discussion paper: “The synthesis does not represent the formal thinking of the FDA, nor is it enforceable…This document does not represent a final version of the LDT draft guidance documents that were published in 2014.” Rather, its purpose is to allow for further public discussion and to give Congress a chance to develop a legislative solution. As the 115th Congress gets underway, a number of Congressional committees reportedly are working with various stakeholders to consider different approaches to regulation of LDTs. It is unclear at this time whether those committees and stakeholders can reach consensus around an approach and develop legislation and whether Congress would pass any such legislation.

If we and our tests become subject to FDA's enforcement of its medical device regulations with respect to LDTs, we may be subject to significant and onerous regulatory obligations. See section entitled “Risk Factors-Regulatory Risks Relating to Our Business-If the FDA regulates LDTs as proposed, then it would classify LDTs according to the current system used to regulate medical devices. Under that system, there are three different classes of medical devices, with the requirements becoming more stringent depending on the Class.”

If we are unable to execute our marketing strategy for our tests and our tests are unable to gain acceptance in the market, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to sustain our business.

Although we believe that our tests represent promising commercial opportunities, our tests may never gain significant acceptance in the marketplace and therefore may never generate substantial revenue or profits for us. We need to continue to develop a market for our tests through physician education and awareness programs. Gaining acceptance in medical communities requires that we perform additional studies after validating the efficacy of our tests and services for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, and that we obtain acceptance of the results of those studies using our tests for publication in leading peer-reviewed medical journals. The results of any studies are always uncertain and even if we believe such studies demonstrate the value of our tests, they process of publication in leading medical journals is subject to a peer review process and peer reviewers may not consider the results of our studies sufficiently novel or worthy of publication. Failure to have our

studies published in peer-reviewed journals would limit the adoption of our tests. Our ability to successfully market the tests that we may develop will depend on numerous factors, including:
whether health care providers believe our diagnostic tests provide clinical utility;
whether the medical community accepts that our diagnostic tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific to be meaningful in patient care and treatment decisions; and
whether health insurers, government health programs and other third-party payors will cover and pay for our diagnostic tests and, if so, whether they will adequately reimburse us.

Failure to achieve widespread market acceptance of our diagnostic tests would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our agreement with Mayo Clinic may not proceed successfully.

In November 2011, we entered into an affiliation agreement with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, subsequently amended. Under the agreement, we formed a joint venture in May 2013 to focus on developing oncology diagnostic services and tests utilizing next generation sequencing. We have made $2.0 million in capital contributions to that joint venture through December 31, 2016. We estimate additional capital contributions by us of up to $4.0 million may be required over the next two years, subject to the joint venture achieving certain operational milestones. The operation of the joint venture may also divert management time from operating our business. No assurances can be given that we will be able to fully fund our obligations under the joint venture agreement, or that, even if funded, the joint venture will ever achieve the research, development and commercial objectives currently contemplated by the parties, such as the discovery and commercialization of new diagnostic tests utilizing next-generation sequencing. If the development efforts of the joint venture do not result in commercially successful tests or services, it will have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we cannot develop tests to keep pace with rapid advances in technology, medicine and science, our operating results and competitive position could be harmed.

In recent years, there have been numerous advances in technologies relating to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. There are several new cancer drugs under development that may increase patient survival time. There have also been advances in methods used to analyze very large amounts of genomic information. We must continuously develop new tests and enhance our existing tests to keep pace with evolving standards of care. Our existing tests could become obsolete unless we continually innovate and expand them to demonstrate benefit in patients treated with new therapies. New cancer therapies typically have only a few years of clinical data associated with them, which limits our ability to perform clinical studies and correlate sets of genes to a new treatment's effectiveness. If we cannot adequately demonstrate the applicability of our tests to new treatments, sales of our tests and services could decline, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our tests do not continue to perform as expected, our operating results, reputation and business will suffer.

Our success depends on the market's confidence that we can continue to provide reliable, high-quality diagnostic tests. We believe that our customers are likely to be particularly sensitive to test defects and errors. As a result, the failure of our tests or services to perform as expected would significantly impair our reputation and the public image of our tests and services, and we may be subject to legal claims arising from any defects or errors.

There is a scarcity of experienced professionals in ourthe Company's industry. If we arethe Company is not able to retain and recruit personnel with the requisite technical skills, wethe Company may be unable to successfully execute ourthe business strategy.

The specialized nature of ourthe Company's industry results in an inherent scarcity of experienced personnel in the field. OurThe Company's future success depends upon ourthe ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel (including medical, scientific, technical, commercial, business, regulatory and administrative personnel) necessary to support our anticipated growth, develop our business and perform certain contractual obligations. Given the scarcity of professionals with the scientific knowledge that we requirethe Company requires and the competition for qualified personnel among life science businesses, wethe Company may not succeed in attracting or retaining the personnel we requirerequired to continue and grow our operations. The loss of a key employee, the failure of a key employee to perform in his or her current position or ourthe Company's inability to attract and retain skilled employees could result in ourthe inability to continue to grow ourthe Company's business or to implement our business strategy.

The loss or transition of any member of the Company's senior management team or the inability to attract and retain highly skilled scientists, clinicians, and salespeople could adversely affect Company business.

OurThe Company's success depends on the skills, experience, and performance of key members of the senior management team. The individual and collective efforts of these employees will be important as the Company continues to develop tests and services, and as the Company expands commercial activities. The loss or incapacity of existing members of the senior management team could adversely affect operations if the Company experiences difficulties in hiring qualified successors.

The complexity inherent in integrating a new key member of the senior management team with existing senior management may limit the effectiveness of any such successor or otherwise adversely affect the Company's business. Leadership transitions can be inherently difficult to manage and may cause uncertainty or a disruption to business or may increase the likelihood of turnover of other key officers and employees. Specifically, a leadership transition in the commercial team may cause uncertainty about or a disruption to the Company's commercial organization, which may impact the ability to achieve sales and revenue targets.

The Company's inability to attract, hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified sales professionals would hamper ourthe ability to increase demand for our tests,the Company's services and to expand geographically and to successfully commercialize any other diagnostic tests or products we may develop.geographically.

OurThe Company's success in selling our clinical laboratory services, biopharma services, discovery services, diagnostic tests and any other tests or products that we are able to develop willDiscovery Services could require usthe Company to expand ourthe sales force in the United States and internationally by recruiting additional sales representatives with extensive experience in oncology and close relationships with medical oncologists, surgeons, pathologists and other hospital personnel, as well as pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinical research organizations.the Company's field. To achieve ourthe Company's marketing and sales goals, wethe Company will need to continue to expand our sales and commercial infrastructure. Sales professionals with the necessary technical and business qualifications are in high demand, and there is a risk that wethe Company may be unable to attract, hire and retain the number of sales professionals with the right qualifications, scientific backgrounds and relationships with decision-makers at potential customers needed to achieve our sales goals. WeThe Company may face competition from other companies in ourthe industry, some of whom are much larger than usthe Company and who can pay greater compensation and benefits than wethe Company can, in seeking to attract and retain qualified sales and marketing employees. If we arethe Company is unable to hire and retain qualified sales and marketing personnel, our business will suffer.

We have indebtedness with restrictive covenants that limit our ability to obtain additional debt financing and that requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, our ability to fund operations, and react to changes in our business.

As of March 22, 2017, we had no indebtedness for borrowed money under our new credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank and $6.0 million under our new term loan with Partners for Growth due on March 22, 2020. However, we do expect to borrow underIf the new credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank to fund our future working capital requirements, which debt will be due on March 22, 2019. We are required to comply with certain financial covenants and restricts us from, among other things, paying cash dividends, incurring debt and entering into certain transactions without the prior consent of the lenders. Repayments of amounts borrowed under the credit facility may be accelerated if an event of default occurs, which includes, among other things, a violation of such financial covenants and negative covenants. Our debt and related covenants could limit our ability to satisfy our obligations, limit our ability to operate our business and impair our competitive position. For example, it could:

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, reducing the availability of our cash flow from operations to fund working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry;
place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors that may have proportionately less debt; and
increase our cost of borrowing.
If ourCompany's laboratory facilities become damaged or inoperable, or we arethe Company is required to vacate any facility, ourthe ability to provide services and pursue our research and development efforts may be jeopardized.

WeThe Company currently derivederives substantially all of our revenues from our laboratory testingpreclinical services. We do not have any clinical reference laboratory facilities outside of our facilities in Rutherford, New Jersey, Morrisville, North Carolina, Hyderabad, India and Los Angeles, California. OurThe Company's facilities and equipment could be harmed or rendered inoperable by natural or man-made disasters, including fire, flooding and power outages, which may render

it difficult or impossible for usthe Company to perform our tests or provide laboratory services for some period of time. The inability to perform our testsservices or the backlog of testsprojects that could develop if any of ourthe Company's facilities is inoperable for even a short period of time may result in the loss of customers or harm to ourthe Company's reputation or relationships with key researchers, collaborators, and wecustomers, and the Company may be unable to regain those customers or repair ourthe Company's reputation in the future. Furthermore, ourthe Company's facilities and the equipment we useused to perform our research and development work could be costly and time-consuming to repair or replace.

Additionally, a key component of our research and development process involves using biological samples and the resulting data sets and medical histories, as the basis for our diagnostic test development. In some cases, these samples are difficult to obtain. If the parts of our laboratory facilities where we store these biological samples are damaged or compromised, our ability to pursue our research and development projects, as well as our reputation, could be jeopardized. We carry insurance for damage to our property and the disruption of our business, but this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses and may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

Further, if any of our laboratories became inoperable we may not be able to license or transfer our proprietary technology to a third-party, with established state licensure and CLIA certification under the scope of which our diagnostic tests could be

performed following validation and other required procedures, to perform the tests. Even if we find a third-party with such qualifications to perform our tests, such party may not be willing to perform the tests for us on commercially reasonable terms. Moreover, we believe our tests are currently subject to an exercise of enforcement discretion by the FDA because the tests are considered LDTs. If we are required to find a third-party laboratory to conduct our testing services, we believe the FDA would consider our tests to be medical devices that are no longer subject to its exercise of enforcement discretion for LDTs. In that case, we may be required to obtain premarket clearance or approval prior to offering our tests, which would be time-consuming and costly and could result in delays in our ability to sell or offer our tests.

If weCompany cannot compete successfully with our competitors, wethe Company may be unable to increase or sustain our revenues or achieve and sustain profitability.

We face competition from mainstream diagnostic methods that pathologists and oncologists use and have used for many years. It may be difficult to change the methods or behavior of the referring pathologists and oncologists to incorporate our molecular diagnostic testing in their practices. We believe that we can introduce our diagnostic tests successfully due to their clinical utility and the desire of pathologists and oncologists to find solutions for more accurate diagnosis, prognosis and personalized treatment options for cancer patients.
We also faceThe Company faces competition from companies that currently offer or are developing animal models for tumors and that have capabilities in toxicology and pharmacology testing. The competitors in the Company's Discovery Services business include Covance, Champions Oncology, Crown BioScience (recently acquired by JSR Life Sciences), Eurofins Scientific, Charles River, Jackson Labs and Explora Biolabs.

The Company's competitors may succeed in selling their products to profile genes, gene expression or protein biomarkers in various cancers. Precision medicine is a new area of science, and we cannot predict what tests others will develop that may compete with or provide results superior to the results we are able to achieve with the tests we develop. Our competitors include public companies such as Abbott Laboratories, Inc., bioTheranostics, Inc., Foundation Medicine, Inc., Genomic Health, Inc., Invitae Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Myriad Genetics Inc., Nant Health, NeoGenomics, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., and many private companies. We expect that pharmaceutical and biotech companies will increasingly focus attentioncustomers more effectively than the Company sells products.  In addition, academic institutions, hospitals, governmental agencies, and resources on the personalized diagnostic sector as the potentialother public and prevalence increases for molecularly targeted oncology therapies approved by FDA along with companion diagnostics.
With respect to our clinical laboratory business we face competition from companies such as Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. (a division of Opko), Genoptix Medical Laboratory, Invitae Corp., LabCorp, NeoGenomics, Inc.,private research organizations also may conduct similar research, seek patent protection, and Quest Diagnostics.
Many of our present and potential competitors have widespread brand recognition and substantially greater financial and technical resources and development, production and marketing capabilities than we do. Others may develop lower-priced, less complex testsand commercially introduce competing products or technologies on their own or through joint ventures. If one or more of the Company's competitors succeeds in developing similar technologies and products that payors, pathologists and oncologists could view as functionally equivalent to our tests, which could force us to lowerare more effective or successful than any of those that the list priceCompany currently sells or will develop, results of our tests and impact our operating margins and our ability to achieve profitability. In addition, technological innovations that result in the creation of enhanced diagnostic tools may enable other clinical laboratories, hospitals, physicians or medical providers to provide specialized diagnostic services similar to ours in a more patient-friendly, efficient or cost-effective manner than is currently possible. If we cannot compete successfully against current or future competitors, we mayoperations will be unable to increase market acceptance and sales of our tests, which could prevent us from increasing or sustaining our revenues or achieving or sustaining profitability.significantly adversely affected.

A small number of test ordering sitescustomers account for most of the sales of our tests andthe Company's services. If any of these sites orderscustomers require fewer testsservices from usthe Company for any reason, our revenues could decline.

Due to the early stage nature of ourthe Company's business and ourthe limited sales and marketing activities to date, we havethe Company has historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of test ordering sites,customers, although the test ordering sitescustomers that generate a significant portion of ourCompany revenue may change from period to period. Our test ordering sitesThe Company's customers are largely hospitals, cancer centers, reference laboratories and physician offices, as well as pharmaceutical and biotech companies as part of a clinical trial. Oncologists and pathologists at these sites order the tests on behalf of the needs of their oncology patients or as part of a clinical trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical and biotech company in which the patient is being enrolled. The top five test ordering clients during 2016 and 2015 accounted for 31% and 49%, respectively, of our testing volumes, with 6% and 18%, respectively, of the test volume coming from community hospitals. During the year ended December 31, 2016, one Biopharma client2019, three customers accounted for approximately 16%61% of our revenue.the Company's consolidated revenue from continuing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2015 one Biopharma client2018, three customers accounted for approximately 19%53% of our revenue.the Company's consolidated revenue from continuing operations. As a healthcare provider, the Company is still providing Discovery Services and has yet to experience a slowdown in its project work; however, the future of many projects may be delayed. The Company continues to vigilantly monitor the situation with its primary focus on the health and safety of its employees and clients.

If we fail to perform our Biopharma services in accordance with contractual and regulatory requirements, and ethical considerations, we could be subject to significant costs or liability.

Through our Biopharma services offering, we contract with pharmaceutical and biotech companies to perform a wide range of services to assist them in bringing new therapeutics to market. Our services include monitoring clinical trials, data and laboratory analysis, clinical trial design consulting, data capture and other related services. Such services are complex and

subject to contractual requirements, regulatory standards and ethical considerations. For example, we are subject to regulation by the FDA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities relating to our activities in conducting pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. If we fail to perform our services in accordance with these requirements, regulatory authorities may take action against us or our customers. Such actions may include failure of such regulatory authority to grant marketing approval of our customers’ products, imposition of holds or delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, rejection of data collected, laboratory license revocation, product recalls, operational restrictions, civil or criminal penalties or prosecutions, damages or fines. Any such action could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses to develop and market our diagnostic tests, which could make it difficult for us to achieve and sustain profitability.

In recent years, we have incurred significant costs in connection with the development of our diagnostic tests. For the year ended December 31, 2016, our research and development expenses were $6.0 million, which was 22% of our revenue and our sales and marketing expenses were $4.7 million, which was 17% of revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our research and development expenses were $5.5 million, which was 30% of our net revenue and our sales and marketing expenses were $5.3 million, which was 29% of revenue. We expect our expenses to continue to increase, in absolute dollars, for the foreseeable future as we seek to expand the clinical utility of our diagnostic tests, drive adoption of and reimbursement for our diagnostic tests and develop new tests. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenues in order to achieve sustained profitability.

We depend on certain collaborations with third parties for the supply of certain tissue samples and biological materials that we use in our research and development efforts. If the costs of such collaborations increase or our third party collaborators terminate their relationship with us, our business may be materially harmed.

Under standard clinical practice in the United States, tumor biopsies removed from patients are chemically preserved, embedded in paraffin wax and stored. Our clinical development relies on our ability to access these archived tumor biopsy samples, as well as information pertaining to their associated clinical outcomes. Other companies often compete with us for access. Additionally, the process of negotiating access to archived samples is lengthy, because it typically involves numerous parties and approvals to resolve complex issues such as usage rights, institutional review board approval, privacy rights, publication rights, intellectual property ownership and research parameters.

We have collaborative relationships with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, the National Cancer Institute, the Cleveland Clinic and other institutions who provide us with tissue samples and other biological materials that we use in developing and validating our tests. We do not have any written arrangement with certain third party collaborators, and in many of the cases in which the arrangements are in writing, our collaborative relationships are terminable on 30 days' notice or less. If one or more collaborators terminate their relationship with us, we will need to identify other third parties to provide us with tissue samples and biological materials, which could result in a delay in our research and development activities and negatively affect our business.
We currently rely on a limited number of suppliers for the reagents and chemistry related to our NGS panels. Any problems, such as disruption of the supply chain or lack of visibility, experienced by these suppliers could result in a delay or interruption in the supply of our NGS panels to us until the problem is cured or until we locate and qualify an alternative source of supply.

The design of our NGS panels is currently optimized using certain reagents and chemistry, which we have incorporated into our processes, equipment and protocols. We currently purchase these components from a limited number of suppliers. If one or more of these suppliers were to delay or stop producing the required reagents, or if the prices charged us were to increase significantly, we would need to identify another supplier and optimize our NGS panels using new reagents. We could experience delays in performing the NGS panels while finding other acceptable suppliers, which could impact our results of operations.

If we were sued for product liability or professional liability, we could face substantial liabilities that exceed our resources.

The marketing, sale and use of our tests could lead to the filing of product liability claims were someone to allege that our tests failed to perform as designed. We may also be subject to liability for errors in the test results we provide to pathologists and oncologists or for a misunderstanding of, or inappropriate reliance upon, the information we provide. A product liability or professional liability claim could result in substantial damages and be costly and time-consuming for us to defend.


Although we believe that our existing product and professional liability insurance is adequate, our insurance may not fully protect us from the financial impact of defending against product liability or professional liability claims. Any product liability or professional liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, could increase our insurance rates or prevent us from securing insurance coverage in the future. Additionally, any product liability lawsuit could damage our reputation, result in the recall of our tests, or cause current clinical partners to terminate existing agreements and potential clinical partners to seek other partners, any of which could impact our results of operations.

If we useCompany uses biological and hazardous materials in a manner that causes injury, wethe Company could be liable for damages.

OurThe Company's activities currently require the controlled use of potentially harmful biological materials and hazardous materials and chemicals. WeThe Company cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury to employees or third parties from the use, storage, handling or disposal of these materials. In the event of contamination or injury, wethe Company could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed ourthe Company's resources or any applicable insurance coverage wethe Company may have. Additionally, we arethe Company is subject to, on an ongoing basis, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations may become significant and could have a material adverse effect on ourthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In the event of an accident or if wethe Company otherwise failfails to comply with applicable regulations, wethe Company could lose our permits or approvals or be held liable for damages or penalized with fines.

If we cannot support demand for our tests, including successfully managingThe Company's Discovery Services customers face intense competition from lower cost generic products, which may lower the evolution of our technology and manufacturing platforms, our business could suffer.amount that they spend on the Company's services.

As our test volume grows, we will needThe Company's Discovery Services customers face increasing competition from lower cost generic products, which in turn may affect their ability to increase our testing capacity, implement increases in scalepursue research and related processing, customer service, billing, collectiondevelopment activities with the Company. In the United States, EU and systems process improvements and expand our internal quality assurance program and technologyJapan, political pressure to support testingreduce spending on a larger scale. We will also need additional certified laboratory scientistsprescription drugs has led to legislation and other scientificmeasures which encourages the use of generic products. In addition, proposals emerge from time to time in the United States and technical personnelother countries for legislation to process these additional tests. Any increasesfurther encourage the early and rapid approval of generic drugs. Loss of patent protection for a product typically is followed promptly by generic substitutes, reducing customers’ sales of that product and their overall profitability. Availability of generic substitutes for the Company's customers’ drugs may adversely affect their results of operations and cash flow, which in scale, related improvementsturn may mean that they would not have surplus capital to invest in research and quality assurancedevelopment and drug commercialization, including in the Company's

services. If competition from generic products impacts customers’ finances such that they decide to curtail the Company's services, revenues may not be successfully implementeddecline and appropriate personnel may not be available. As additional tests are commercialized, we will need to bring new equipment on line, implement new systems, technology, controls and procedures and hire personnel with different qualifications. Failure to implement necessary procedures or to hire the necessary personnelthis could result in a higher cost of processing or an inability to meet market demand. We cannot assure you that we will be able to perform tests on a timely basis at a level consistent with demand, that our efforts to scale our commercial operations will not negatively affect the quality of our test results or that we will respond successfully to the growing complexity of our testing operations. If we encounter difficulty meeting market demand or quality standards for our tests, our reputation could be harmed and our future prospects and business could suffer, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.the Company's business.

We dependThe Company depends on our information technology and telecommunications systems, and any failure of these systems could harm ourthe Company's business.

We dependThe Company depends on information technology and telecommunications systems for significant aspects of our operations. In addition, our third-party billing and collections provider depends upon telecommunications and data systems provided by outside vendors and information we provide on a regular basis. These information technology and telecommunications systems support a variety of functions, including test processing, sample tracking, quality control, customer service and support, billing, and reimbursement, research and development activities and our general and administrative activities. Information technology and telecommunications systems are vulnerable to damage from a variety of sources, including telecommunications or network failures, malicious human acts and natural disasters. Moreover, despite network security and back-up measures, some of ourthe Company's servers are potentially vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems. Despite the precautionary measures we have taken to prevent unanticipated problems that could affect our information technology and telecommunications systems, failures or significant downtime of our information technology or telecommunications systems or those used by our third-party service providers could prevent us from processing tests, providing test results to pathologists, oncologists, billing payors, processing reimbursement appeals, handling patient or physician inquiries, conducting research and development activities and managing the administrative aspects of our business. Any disruption or loss of information technology or telecommunications systems on which critical aspects of ourthe Company's operations depend could have an adverse effect on our business.

Security breaches, loss of data, and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business or prevent us from accessing critical information and expose us to fines, penalties, liability, and adverse effects to our business and our reputation.


In the ordinary course of our business, we and our third-party billing and collections provider collect and store sensitive data, including legally protected health information, personally identifiable information, intellectual property, and proprietary business information owned or controlled by ourselves or our customers, payors, and pharmaceutical and biotech partners. The secure processing, storage, maintenance, and transmission of this critical information is vital to our operations and business strategy, and we devote significant resources to protecting such information. Although we take measures to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access or disclosure, our information technology and infrastructure, and that of our third-party billing and collections provider, may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or viruses or breached due to employee error, malfeasance, or other disruptions. Any such breach or interruption could compromise our networks, and the information stored there could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Any such improper access or disclosure, or loss of information could require us to provide notice to the affected individuals, the press, and regulatory bodies, result in legal claims or proceedings, liability, fines and penalties under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”), their implementing regulations, and similar state laws. Unauthorized access, loss, or dissemination could also disrupt our operations, including our ability to conduct our analyses, provide test results, bill payors or patients, process claims and appeals, provide customer assistance services, conduct research and development activities, collect, process, and prepare company financial information, provide information about our products and other patient and physician education and outreach efforts through our website, manage the administrative aspects of our business, and damage our reputation, any of which could adversely affect our business.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) may impose penalties on a covered entity, such as us, for a failure to comply with a requirement of HIPAA. Penalties will vary significantly depending on factors such as the date of the violation, whether the covered entity knew or should have known of the failure to comply, or whether the covered entity's failure to comply was due to willful neglect. These penalties include civil monetary penalties of $100 to $50,000 per violation, up to an annual, per violation cap of $1,500,000. A single breach incident can result in violations of multiple standards, resulting in possible penalties potentially in excess of $1,500,000. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase to $100,000 and up to five years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses, and to $250,000 and up to 10 years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm. The U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for criminal prosecutions under HIPAA.

HIPAA authorizes state attorneys general to file suit under HIPAA on behalf of state residents. Courts can award damages, costs and attorneys' fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue us in civil court for HIPAA violations, its standards have been used as the basis for a duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of Protected Health Information.

In addition, HIPAA mandates that the Secretary of HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of HIPAA covered entities for compliance with the HIPAA privacy and security regulations. It also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of breaches of unsecured Protected Health Information may receive a percentage of the Civil Monetary Penalty fine paid by the violator.
HIPAA further requires covered entities to notify affected individuals "without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach" if their unsecured Protected Health Information is subject to an unauthorized access, use or disclosure. If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS and local media without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public website. If a breach affects fewer than 500 individuals, the covered entity must log it and notify HHS at least annually.

In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer, health-related, and data protection laws in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere are often uncertain, contradictory, and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. If so, this could result in government-imposed fines or orders requiring that we change our practices, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, these privacy regulations may differ from country to country, and may vary based on whether testing is performed in the United States or in the local country. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices and compliance procedures in a manner adverse to our business.

Regulatory Risks Relating to Our Business

Changes in health care law, regulations and policy may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,Company's results of operations may be adversely affected if the Company fails to realize the full value of goodwill and cash flows.intangible assets.

In March 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama signedThe Company assesses the Patient Protectionrealizable condition of indefinite-lived intangible assets and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Caregoodwill annually and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, “PPACA”), which makes a number of substantialconducts an interim evaluation whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as operating losses or a significant decline in earnings associated with the way health care is financed by both governmental and private insurers. Among other things,acquired business or asset, indicate that these assets may be impaired. The Company's ability to realize the PPACA:

Requires each medical device manufacturer to pay a sales tax equal to 2.3%value of the price for which such manufacturer sells its medical devices, beginning in 2013. This tax may apply to some or all of our current productsgoodwill and products which are in development.
Mandates a reduction in payments for clinical laboratory services paid underindefinite-lived intangible assets will depend on the Medicare Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (“CLFS”) of 1.75% for the years 2011 through 2015. In addition, a productivity adjustment is made to the fee schedule payment amount. These changes in payments apply to some or allfuture cash flows of the clinical laboratory test services we furnishbusinesses the Company has acquired, which in turn depend in part on how well the Company has integrated these businesses into the Company's own business. If the Company is not able to Medicare beneficiaries.
Establishes an Independent Payment Advisory Board to reducerealize the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending. The Independent Payment Advisory Board has broad discretion to propose policies, which may have a negative impact on payment rates for services, including clinical laboratory services, beginning in 2016, and for hospital services beginning in 2020.

Although some of these provisions may negatively impact payment rates for clinical laboratory services, the PPACA also extends coverage to approximately 32 million previously uninsured people, which may result in an increase in the demand for our tests and services. The mandatory purchase of insurance has been strenuously opposed by a number of state governors, resulting in lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of certain provisionsvalue of the PPACA. On June 28, 2012,goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the health care reform law, with the exception of certain provisions dealing with the expansion of Medicaid coverage under the law. While most of the law's provisions went into effect in 2013 and 2014, Congress has proposed a number of legislative initiatives, including possible repeal of the PPACA. On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in King v. Burwell, which allows the federal government to continue to extend tax subsidies to those individuals who purchased coverage through federal exchanges, in addition to the exchanges established by individual states.

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of PPACA. In January 2017, Congress voted to adopt a budget resolution for fiscal year 2017, or the Budget Resolution, that authorizes the implementation of legislation that would repeal portions of PPACA. The Budget Resolution is not a law; however, it is widely viewed as the first step toward the passage of legislation that would repeal certain aspects of PPACA. Further, on January 20, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under PPACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of PPACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Congress also could consider subsequent legislation to replace elements of PPACA that are repealed. Because of the continued uncertainty about the implementation of PPACA, including the potential for further legal challenges or repeal of PPACA, we cannot quantify or predict with any certainty the likely impact of the PPACA or its repeal on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, on January 30, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order, applicable to all executive agencies, including FDA, that requires that for each notice of proposed rulemaking or final regulation to be issued in fiscal year 2017, the agency shall identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed, unless prohibited by law. These requirements are referred to as the “two-for-one” provisions. We cannot predict what impact the “two-for-one” provisions may have on our business.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the PPACA was enacted. On August 2, 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things, creates the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend proposals in spending reductions to Congress. The Joint Select Committee did not achieve a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, triggering the legislation's automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, starting in 2013. This 2% sequester was recently extended through 2024.

In addition, on February 22, 2012, President Obama signed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (“MCTRJCA”), which, among other things, mandated an additional change in Medicare reimbursement for clinical laboratory services. This legislation requires a rebasing of the Medicare CLFS to effect a 2% reduction in payment rates otherwise determined for 2013. This will serve as a base for 2014 and subsequent years. As a result of the changes mandated by PPACA and MCTRJCA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) projects laboratory services for 2015 will be reduced by approximately 0.25%.


Further, in 2014, Congress passed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act or PAMA which also makes significant changes in the way the Medicare will pay for laboratory services. Under PAMA and its implementing regulations, certain laboratories are required to report the amount that they are paid by third party payors for each test beginning in January 2017. CMS will use this data to calculate a weighted median for each test. That new price is supposed to effective on January 1, 2018, although any resulting reductions in excess of 10% will be phased in over time. This data reporting process will be repeated every three years for most tests, although laboratories offering Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (ADLTs) will have to report private payor data on those tests annually. It is possible that some of our tests may qualify as Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests, which will require us to submit pricing annually for those tests. In addition, under PAMA, we alsoCompany may be required to obtain new unique codes from CMS or any entity it designates, for our tests that do not currently have unique codes. If PAMAincur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized goodwill impairment of $2.9 million after considering the effects of the Business Disposals and declines in stock price. Such impairment charges could materially and adversely affect the Company's operating results in a significant reduction in the prices for our tests, it could have a significant impact on our revenues and it is not known at this time how the implementation of PAMA will affect our reimbursement.financial condition.

Certain of our laboratory servicesThe Company's operations are paid undersubject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, with which compliance may be costly.

The Company's business is subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and, under the current statutory formula, the rates for these services are updated annually. For the past several years, the applicationprotection of the statutory formula would have resulted in substantial payment reductions if Congress failedenvironment, worker health and safety and the use, management, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. Failure to intervene. In the past, Congress passed interim legislation to prevent the decreases. On April 16, 2015, President Obama signed the Medicarecomply with these laws and CHIP Reauthorization Act (“MACRA”), which had previously been passed by both houses of Congress. MACRA repealed the provisions related to the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula and implements a new physician payment system that is designed to reward the quality of care. In addition, it extends the current Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rates through June 2015, and then increases them by 0.5%t for the remainder of 2015. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the rates will be increased annually by 0.5%, through 2019. For 2020 through 2025 payments will be frozen, although payment will be adjusted to account for performance on certain quality metrics under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment Systems (“MIPS”) or to reflect physician participation in alternative payment models (“APMs”). For 2026 and subsequent years, qualified APM participants receive an annual 0.75% update on Medicare physician payment rates, while those not participating receive a 0.25% annual payment update, plus any applicable MIPS-based payment adjustments. At this time, it is too early to determine how these changes may impact our business beyond 2015. It is unclear what impact, if any, MACRA will have on our business and operating results, but any resulting decrease in paymentregulations may result in reduced demandsubstantial fines, penalties or other sanctions. In addition, environmental laws and regulations could require the Company to pay for our services, whichenvironmental remediation and response costs, or subject the Company to third party claims for personal injury, natural resource or property damage, relating to environmental contamination. Liability may be imposed whether or not the Company knew of, or were responsible for, such environmental contamination. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of compliance with environmental, health and safety regulatory requirements or of remediating contamination could materially adversely impact our revenues andaffect the Company's business, assets or results of operations.

On November 2, 2016, CMS issued its Final Physician Fee Schedule Rule for 2017, which set out policies that were effective January 2017. Among those policy changes are reductions in the payments for flow cytometry by approximately 19% and an increase in the professional component of immunohistochemistry by approximately 9%, two types of tests that we frequently perform. At this time, we are still assessing the potential impact of these changes.

In addition, many of the Current Procedure Terminology (“CPT”) procedure codes that we use to bill our tests were revised by the AMA, effective January 1, 2013. In the Final Physician Fee Schedule Rule for 2013, CMS announced that it has decided to keep the new molecular codes on the CLFS, rather than move themIntellectual Property Risks Relating to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule as some stakeholders had urged. CMS also announced that for 2013 it would price the new codes using a "gapfilling" process by which it will refer the codes to the Medicare contractors to allow them to determine an appropriate price. Those prices were determined and became effective January 1, 2014. In addition, CMS also stated that it would not recognize certain of the new codes for Multi-Analyte Assays with Algorithmic Assays (“MAAAs”) because it does not believe they qualify as clinical laboratory tests. However, more recently, it has determined that the individual contractors may determine whether to pay for MAAA tests on a case by case basis. On September 25, 2015, CMS released its Preliminary Determinations for new CPT codes effective in 2016, including several new MAAA CPT codes. CMS had proposed "crosswalking" these codes to an unrelated test, resulting in a significant cut in their reimbursement. However, on November 17, 2015, CMS reversed its policy and directed that the tests be gapfilled by the local contracts. It is expected that when PAMA is fully implemented, many of the MAAA codes could qualify to be reimbursed as Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (“ADLTs”), although it is unclear whether laboratories offering such tests voluntarily will apply for the ADLT designation for those tests. There can be no guarantees that Medicare and other payors will establish positive or adequate coverage policies or reimbursement rates.

We cannot predict whether future health care initiatives will be implemented at the federal or state level, or how any future legislation or regulation may affect us. The taxes imposed by the new federal legislation and the expansion of government's role in the U.S. health care industry as well as changes to the reimbursement amounts paid by payors for our products or our medical procedure volumes may reduce our profits and have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, Congress has proposed on several occasions to impose a 20% coinsurance on patients for clinical laboratory tests reimbursed under the CLFS, which would require us to bill patients for these amounts. Because of the relatively low reimbursement for many clinical laboratory tests, in the event that Congress were to ever enact such legislation, the cost of billing and collecting for these services would often exceed the amount actually received from the patient and effectively increase our costs of billing and collecting.

We depend on Medicare and a limited number of private payors for a significant portion of our revenues and if these or other payors stop providing reimbursement or decrease the amount of reimbursement for our tests, our revenues could decline.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we derived approximately 20% of our total revenue from private insurance, including managed care organizations and other health care insurance providers, 14% from Medicare and 5% from other health care facilities billed directly. Medicare and other third-party payors may withdraw their coverage policies or cancel their contracts with us at any time, review and adjust the rate of reimbursement or stop paying for our tests altogether, which would reduce our total revenues.

Payors have increased their efforts to control the cost, utilization and delivery of health care services. In the past, measures have been undertaken to reduce payment rates for and decrease utilization of the clinical laboratory industry generally. Because of the cost-trimming trends, third-party payors that currently cover and provide reimbursement for our tests may suspend, revoke or discontinue coverage at any time, or may reduce the reimbursement rates payable to us. Any such action could have a negative impact on our revenues, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, we are currently considered a “non-contracting provider” by a number of private third-party payors because we have not entered into a specific contract to provide our specialized diagnostic services to their insured patients at specified rates of reimbursement. If we were to become a contracting provider in the future, the amount of overall reimbursement we receive is likely to decrease because we will be reimbursed less money per test performed at a contracted rate than at a non-contracted rate, which could have a negative impact on our revenues. Further, we typically are unable to collect payments from patients beyond that which is paid by their insurance and will continue to experience lost revenue as a result.

Because of certain Medicare billing rules, we may not receive reimbursement for all tests provided to Medicare patients.

Under current Medicare billing rules, claims for our tests performed on Medicare beneficiaries who were hospital inpatients when the tumor tissue samples were obtained and whose tests were ordered less than 14 days from discharge must be incorporated in the payment that the hospital receives for the inpatient services provided. Accordingly, we must bill individual hospitals for tests performed on Medicare beneficiaries during these timeframes in order to receive payment for our tests. Because we generally do not have a written agreement in place with these hospitals that purchase these tests, we may not be paid for our tests or may have to pursue payment from the hospital on a case-by-case basis. In addition, until 2012, we were permitted to bill globally for certain anatomic pathology services we furnished to certain hospitals, i.e. we billed both the technical component and the professional component to Medicare. As part of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Congress terminated the special provision for "grandfathered" hospitals as of July 1, 2012. Therefore, as of that date we were required to bill all hospitals for the technical component of all anatomic pathology services we furnish to their patients, which may be difficult and/or costly for us.

Further, the Medicare Administrative Contractors who process claims for Medicare also can impose their own rules related to coverage and payment for laboratory services provided in their jurisdiction. In 2013, Palmetto GBA, the Medicare Administrative Contractor for North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia, announced a comprehensive new billing policy and a coverage policy applicable to molecular diagnostic tests, such as ours. Under coverage policy, Palmetto will deny payment for molecular diagnostic tests, unless it has issued a positive coverage determination for the test. Other Medicare contractors are also adopting policies similar to Palmetto's. If any of our tests are subject to the Palmetto policy and/or the Palmetto policy is adopted by other contractors that process claims with hospitals or laboratories that purchase and bill for our tests, our business could be adversely impacted.

Complying with numerous regulations pertaining to our business is an expensive and time-consuming process, and any failure to comply could result in substantial penalties.

We are subject to CLIA, a federal law regulating clinical laboratories that perform testing on specimens derived from humans for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of disease. Our clinical laboratory must be certified under CLIA in order for us to perform testing on human specimens. In addition, our proprietary tests must also be recognized as part of our accredited programs under CLIA so that we can offer them in our laboratory. CLIA is intended to ensure the quality and reliability of clinical laboratories in the United States by mandating specific standards in the areas of personnel qualifications, administration, and participation in proficiency testing, patient test management, quality control, quality assurance and inspections. We have a current certificate under CLIA to perform high complexity testing and our laboratory is accredited by CAP, one of six CLIA-approved accreditation organizations. To renew this certificate, we are

subject to survey and inspection every two years. Moreover, CLIA inspectors may make periodic inspections of our clinical reference laboratory outside of the renewal process.
The law also requires us to maintain a state laboratory license to conduct testing in that state. Our laboratory is located in New Jersey and must have a New Jersey state license; as we expand our geographic focus, we may need to obtain laboratory licenses from additional states. New Jersey laws establish standards for day-to-day operation of our clinical reference laboratory, including the training and skills required of personnel and quality control. In addition, several other states require that we hold licenses to test specimens from patients in those states. Other states may have similar requirements or may adopt similar requirements in the future. Finally, we may be subject to regulation in foreign jurisdictions as we seek to expand international distribution of our tests.
If we were to lose our CLIA certification, CAP accreditation or New Jersey laboratory license, whether as a result of a revocation, suspension or limitation, we would no longer be able to offer our tests, which would limit our revenues and harm our business. If we were to lose our license in other states where we are required to hold licenses, we would not be able to test specimens from those states.

If FDA were to begin requiring approval or clearance of our tests, we could incur substantial costs and time delays associated with meeting requirements for pre-market clearance or approval or we could experience decreased demand for, or reimbursement of, our tests.

Although FDA maintains that it has authority to regulate the development and use of LDTs, such as ours, as medical devices, it has not exercised its authority with respect to most LDTs as a matter of enforcement discretion. FDA does not generally extend its enforcement discretion to reagents or software provided by third parties and used to perform LDTs, and therefore these products must typically comply with FDA medical device regulations, which are wide-ranging and govern, among other things: product design and development, product testing, product labeling, product storage, pre-market clearance or approval, advertising and promotion and product sales and distribution.

We believe that our proprietary tests, as utilized in our laboratory testing, are LDTs. As a result, we believe that pursuant to FDA's current policies and guidance that FDA does not require that we obtain regulatory clearances or approvals for our LDTs. The container we provide for collection and transport of tumor samples from a pathology laboratory to our clinical reference laboratory may be a medical device subject to FDA's enforcement of its medical device regulations but we believe it is currently exempt from pre-market review by FDA. While we believe that we are currently in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that FDA or other regulatory agencies would agree with our determination, and a determination that we have violated these laws, or a public announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations of these laws, could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
Moreover, FDA guidance and policy pertaining to diagnostic testing is continuing to evolve and is subject to ongoing review and revision. A significant change in any of the laws, regulations or policies may require us to change our business model in order to maintain regulatory compliance. At various times since 2006, FDA has issued guidance documents or announced draft guidance regarding initiatives that may require varying levels of FDA oversight of our tests. For example, in June 2010, FDA announced a public meeting to discuss the agency's oversight of LDTs prompted by the increased complexity of LDTs and their increasingly important role in clinical decision-making and disease management, particularly in the context of personalized medicine. FDA indicated that it was considering a risk-based application of oversight to LDTs and that, following public input and discussion, it might issue separate draft guidance on the regulation of LDTs, which ultimately could require that we seek and obtain either pre-market clearance or approval of LDTs, depending upon the risk-based approach FDA adopts. The public meeting was held in July 2010 and further public comments were submitted to FDA through September 2010. Section 1143 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, signed by the U.S. President on July 9, 2012, required FDA to notify U.S. Congress at least 60 days prior to issuing a draft or final guidance regulating LDTs and provide details of the anticipated action.

On July 31, 2014, FDA notified Congress pursuant to the FDASIA that it intended to issue draft Guidances that would modify its policy of enforcement discretion with respect to LDTs and begin to enforce the applicable medical device regulations with respect to such products and tests. On October 3, 2014, the FDA issued two separate draft guidances: “Framework for Regulatory Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)” (“The Framework Draft Guidance”) and “FDA Notification and Medical Device Reporting for Laboratory Developed Tests” (the “Notification Draft Guidance”). In the Framework Draft Guidance, FDA stated that after the Guidances are finalized, it no longer would exercise enforcement discretion with respect to most LDTs and instead would regulate them in a risk-based manner consistent with the existing classification of medical devices. The Framework Draft Guidance stated that within six months after the Guidances were finalized, all laboratories would be required to give notice to the FDA and provide basic information concerning the nature of the LDTs offered. The

FDA then would begin a phased-in review of the LDTs available, based on the risk associated with the tests. For the highest risk LDTs, which the FDA classifies as Class III devices, the Framework Draft Guidance stated that the FDA would begin to require premarket review within 12 months after the Guidance was finalized. Other high risk LDTs would be reviewed over the next four years and then lower risk tests (Class II tests) would be reviewed in the following four to nine years. The Framework Draft Guidance stated that FDA expected to issue a separate Guidance describing the criteria for its risk-based classification 18-24 months after the Guidances were finalized.

On November 18, 2016, the FDA stated that it would not be issuing final guidance on regulation of LDTs and, instead, it would outline its view of an appropriate risk-based approach to LDTs. On January 13, 2017, the FDA released a “Discussion Paper on Laboratory Developed Tests” that synthesizes the feedback that the agency received from various stakeholders on FDA regulation of LDTs “with the hope that it advances public discussion on LDT oversight.” The FDA stated in the introduction to the discussion paper: “The synthesis does not represent the formal thinking of the FDA, nor is it enforceable…This document does not represent a final version of the LDT draft guidance documents that were published in 2014.” Rather, its purpose is to allow for further public discussion and to give Congress a chance to develop a legislative solution. As the 115th Congress gets underway, a number of Congressional committees reportedly are working with various stakeholders to consider different approaches to regulation of LDTs. It is unclear at this time whether those committees and stakeholders can reach consensus around an approach and develop legislation and whether Congress would pass any such legislation.

If the FDA regulates LDTs as proposed, then it would classify LDTs according to the current system used to regulate medical devices. Under that system, there are three different classes of medical devices, with the requirements becoming more stringent depending on the Class.
We cannot provide any assurance that FDA regulation, including pre-market review, will not be required in the future for our tests, whether through guidance issued by FDA, new enforcement policies adopted by FDA or new legislation enacted by Congress. We believe it is possible that legislation will be enacted into law or guidance could be issued by FDA, which may result in increased regulatory burdens for us to continue to offer our tests or to develop and introduce new tests. Given the attention Congress continues to give to these issues, legislation affecting this area may be enacted into law and may result in increased regulatory burdens on us as we continue to offer our tests and to develop and introduce new tests.
In addition, the former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services requested that its Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society make recommendations about the oversight of genetic testing. A final report was published in April 2008. If the report's recommendations for increased oversight of genetic testing were to result in further regulatory burdens, they could negatively affect our business and delay the commercialization of tests in development.

A FDA requirement that LDTs undergo premarket review could negatively affect our business until such review is completed and clearance or approval to market is obtained. FDA could require that we stop selling our tests pending pre-market clearance or approval. If FDA allows our tests to remain on the market but there is uncertainty about our tests, if they are labeled investigational by FDA or if labeling claims FDA allows us to make are very limited, orders or reimbursement may decline. The regulatory approval process may involve, among other things, successfully completing additional clinical trials and making a 510(k) submission, or filing a PMA application with FDA. If FDA requires pre-market review, our tests may not be cleared or approved on a timely basis, if at all. We may also decide voluntarily to pursue FDA pre-market review of our tests if we determine that doing so would be appropriate.

Additionally, should future regulatory actions affect any of the reagents we obtain from vendors and use in conducting our tests, our business could be adversely affected in the form of increased costs of testing or delays, limits or prohibitions on the purchase of reagents necessary to perform our testing.

If we were required to conduct additional clinical trials prior to continuing to offer our proprietary tests or any other tests that we may develop as LDTs, those trials could lead to delays or failure to obtain necessary regulatory approval, which could cause significant delays in commercializing any future products and harm our ability to achieve sustained profitability.

If the FDA decides to require that we obtain clearance or approvals to commercialize our proprietary tests, we may be required to conduct additional clinical testing prior to submitting a 510(k) premarket notification or PMA application for commercial sales. In addition, as part of our long-term strategy we plan to seek FDA clearance or approval so we can sell our proprietary tests outside our laboratory; however, we need to conduct additional clinical validation activities on our proprietary tests before we can submit an application for FDA approval or clearance. Clinical trials must be conducted in compliance with FDA regulations or FDA may take enforcement action or reject the data. The data collected from these clinical trials may ultimately be used to support market clearance or approval for our tests. Once commenced, we believe it would likely take two years or

more to conduct the studies and trials necessary to obtain clearance or approval from FDA to commercially launch any of our proprietary tests outside of our clinical laboratory. Even if our clinical trials are completed as planned, we cannot be certain that their results will support our test claims or that FDA or foreign authorities will agree with our conclusions regarding our test results. Success in early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the later trials will replicate the results of prior trials and studies. If we are required to conduct clinical trials, whether using prospectively acquired samples or archival samples, delays in the commencement or completion of clinical testing could significantly increase our test development costs, delay commercialization, and interrupt sales of our current products and tests. Many of the factors that may cause or lead to a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to delay or denial of regulatory clearance or approval. The commencement of clinical trials may be delayed due to insufficient patient enrollment, which is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites and the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial. Moreover, the clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our tests are effective for the proposed indicated uses, which could cause us to abandon a test candidate and may delay development of other tests.
We may find it necessary to engage contract research organizations to perform data collection and analysis and other aspects of our clinical trials, which might increase the cost and complexity of our trials. We may also depend on clinical investigators, medical institutions and contract research organizations to perform the trials properly. If these parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if the quality, completeness or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or for other reasons, our clinical trials may have to be extended, delayed or terminated. Many of these factors would be beyond our control. We may not be able to enter into replacement arrangements without undue delays or considerable expenditures. If there are delays in testing or approvals as a result of the failure to perform by third parties, our research and development costs would increase, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory clearance or approval for our tests. In addition, we may not be able to establish or maintain relationships with these parties on favorable terms, if at all. Each of these outcomes would harm our ability to market our tests or to achieve sustained profitability.

We are subject to federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.

We are subject to health care fraud and abuse regulation and enforcement by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. These health care laws and regulations include, for example:

the federal Anti-kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase order or recommendation of, any item or services for which payment may be made under a federal health care program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
the federal physician self-referral prohibition, commonly known as the Stark Law, which prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to providers of "designated health services" with whom the physician or a member of the physician's immediate family has an ownership interest or compensation arrangement, unless a statutory or regulatory exception applies;
HIPAA, which established federal crimes for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program or making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services;
the federal civil monetary penalties law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration, including waivers of co-payments and deductible amounts (or any part thereof), to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary's decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;
federal false claims laws, which, prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent; and
state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers.

Further, the PPACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes.

Company's Business

The PPACA, among other things, also imposed new reporting requirements on manufacturers of certain devices, drugs and biologics for certain payments and transfers of value by them and in some cases their distributors to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Failure to submit required information timely, completely and accurately for all payments, transfers of value and ownership or investment interests may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year (or up to an aggregate of $1.0 million per year for “knowing failures”). Manufacturers must submit reports by the 90th day of each calendar year. Any failure to comply with these reporting requirements could result in significant fines and penalties. Because we manufacture our own LDTs solely for use by or within our own laboratory, we believe that we are exempt from these reporting requirements. We cannot assure you, however, that the government will agree with our determination, and a determination that we have violated these laws and regulations, or a public announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations, could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

We have adopted policies and procedures designed to comply with these laws, including policies and procedures relating to financial arrangements between us and physicians who refer patients to us. In the ordinary course of our business, we conduct internal reviews of our compliance with these laws. Our compliance is also subject to governmental review. The government alleged that we engaged in improper billing practices in the past and we may be the subject of such allegations in the future as the growth of our business and sales organization may increase the potential of violating these laws or our internal policies and procedures. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws and regulations is further increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations.

Any action brought against us for violation of these laws or regulations, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws and regulations, we may be subject to any applicable penalty associated with the violation, including civil and criminal penalties, damages and fines, and/or exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medi-Cal or other state or federal health care programs, we could be required to refund payments received by us, and we could be required to curtail or cease our operations. Any of the foregoing consequences could seriously harm our business and our financial results.

We are required to comply with laws governing the transmission, security and privacy of health information that require significant compliance costs, and any failure to comply with these laws could result in material criminal and civil penalties.

Under the administrative simplification provisions of HIPAA, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued regulations which establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic health care transactions and protecting the privacy and security of Protected Health Information used or disclosed by health care providers and other covered entities. Three principal regulations with which we are currently required to comply have been issued in final form under HIPAA: privacy regulations, security regulations and standards for electronic transactions.

The privacy regulations cover the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information by health care providers. It also sets forth certain rights that an individual has with respect to his or her Protected Health Information maintained by a health care provider, including the right to access or amend certain records containing Protected Health Information or to request restrictions on the use or disclosure of Protected Health Information. We have implemented policies, procedures and standards in an effort to comply appropriately with the final HIPAA security regulations, which establish requirements for safeguarding the confidentiality, integrity and availability of Protected Health Information, which is electronically transmitted or electronically stored. The HIPAA privacy and security regulations establish a uniform federal "floor" and do not supersede state laws that are more stringent or provide individuals with greater rights with respect to the privacy or security of, and access to, their records containing Protected Health Information. As a result, we are required to comply with both HIPAA privacy regulations and varying state privacy and security laws. Moreover, HITECH, among other things, established certain health information security breach notification requirements. Under HIPAA, a covered entity must notify any individual "without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach" if their unsecured Protected Health Information is subject to an unauthorized access, use or disclosure. If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS and local media without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public website. If a breach affects fewer than 500 individuals, the covered entity must log it and notify HHS at least annually.

These laws contain significant fines and other penalties for wrongful use or disclosure of Protected Health Information. We have implemented practices and procedures to meet the requirements of the HIPAA privacy regulations and state privacy laws. In addition, we are in the process of taking necessary steps to comply with HIPAA's standards for electronic transactions, which establish standards for common health care transactions. Given the complexity of the HIPAA, HITECH and state privacy restrictions, the possibility that the regulations may change, and the fact that the regulations are subject to changing and

potentially conflicting interpretation, our ability to comply with the HIPAA, HITECH and state privacy requirements is uncertain and the costs of compliance are significant. To the extent that we submit electronic health care claims and payment transactions that do not comply with the electronic data transmission standards established under HIPAA and HITECH, payments to us may be delayed or denied. Additionally, the costs of complying with any changes to the HIPAA, HITECH and state privacy restrictions may have a negative impact on our operations. We could be subject to criminal penalties and civil sanctions for failing to comply with the HIPAA, HITECH and state privacy restrictions, which could result in the incurrence of significant monetary penalties. For further discussion of HIPAA and the impact on our business, see the section entitled "Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business and Strategy-Security breaches, loss of data, and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business or prevent us from accessing critical information and expose us to fines, penalties, liability, and adverse effects to our business and our reputation."

Intellectual Property Risks Related to Our Business

OurCompany's rights to use technologies licensed from third parties are not within ourthe Company's control, and wethe Company may not be able to sell our products if we lose ourthe Company loses existing rights or cannot obtain new rights on reasonable terms.

OurThe Company's ability to market certain of our tests and services, domestically and/or internationally, is in part derived from licenses to intellectual property which is owned by third parties. As such, wethe Company may not be able to continue selling our tests and services if we lose ourthe Company loses existing licensed rights or sell new tests and services if wethe Company cannot obtain such licensed rights on reasonable terms. In particular, we currently in-license a biomarker from the National Cancer Institute used in our FHACT probe. Further, we may also need to license other technologies to commercialize future products. As may be expected, ourthe Company's business may suffer if (i) these licenses terminate; (ii) if the licensors fail to abide by the terms of the license, properly maintain the licensed intellectual property or fail to prevent infringement of such intellectual property by third parties; (iii) if the licensed patents or other intellectual property rights are found to be invalid or (iv) if we arethe Company is unable to enter into necessary licenses on reasonable terms or at all. In return for the use of a third-party'sthird-party’s technology, wethe Company may agree to pay the licensor royalties based on sales of our products as well as other fees. Such royalties and fees are a component of cost of product revenues and will impact the margins on ourthe Company's tests.

Our collaborators may assert ownership or commercial rights to inventions we develop from our use ofIf the biological materials they provide to us.

We rely on certain collaborators to provide us with tissue samples and biological materials that we use to develop our tests. In some cases we have written agreements with collaborators that may require us to negotiate ownership and commercial rights with the collaborator if our use of such collaborator's materials results in an invention. Other agreements may limit our use of those materials to research/not for profit use. In other cases, we may not have written agreements, or the written agreements we have may not clearly deal with intellectual property rights. If we cannot successfully negotiate sufficient ownership and commercial rights to the inventions that result from our use of a collaborator's materials where required, or if disputes otherwise arise with respect to the intellectual property developed with the use of a collaborator's samples, we may be limited in our ability to capitalize on the market potential of these inventions.

The U.S. government may have "march-in rights" to certain of our probe related intellectual property.

Because federal grant monies were used in support of the research and development activities that resulted in our two issued U.S. patents, the federal government retains what are referred to as "march-in rights" to these patents. In particular, the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health, each of which administered grant monies to us, technically retain the right to require us, under certain specific circumstances, to grant the U.S. government either a nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive license to the patented invention in any field of use, upon terms that are reasonable for a particular situation. Circumstances that trigger march-in rights include, for example, failure to take, within a reasonable time, effective steps to achieve practical application of the invention in a field of use, failure to satisfy the health and safety needs of the public, and failure to meet requirements of public use specified by federal regulations. The National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health can elect to exercise these march-in rights on their own initiative or at the request of a third-party.

If we areCompany is unable to maintain intellectual property protection, our competitive position could be harmed.
 
OurThe Company's ability to protect our proprietary discoveries and technologies affects ourthe Company's ability to compete and to achieve sustained profitability. Currently, we relythe Company relies on a combination of U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, copyrights, trademarks and trademark applications,

confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, material transfer agreements, licenses, work-for-hire agreements and invention assignment agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. WeThe Company also maintainmaintains as trade secrets certain company know-how and technological innovations designed to provide usthe Company with a competitive advantage in the

marketplace. Currently, including both U.S. and foreign patent applications, we havethe Company has only two issued U.S. patents and twelve pending patent applications relating to various aspects of ourthe Company's technology. While wethe Company does not currently intend to pursue additional patent applications, it is possible that our pending patent applications and any future applications may not result in issued patents. Even if patents are issued, third parties may independently develop similar or competing technology that avoids ourthe Company's patents. Further, wethe Company cannot be certain that the steps wethat have been taken will prevent the misappropriation of ourthe Company's trade secrets and other confidential information and technology, particularly in foreign countries where we dothe Company does not have intellectual property rights.

From time to time the U.S. Supreme Court, other federal courts, the U.S. Congress or the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) may change the standards of patentability. Any such changes could have a negative impact on our business. For instance, on October 30, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision that methods or processes cannot be patented unless they are tied to a machine or involve a physical transformation. The U.S. Supreme Court later reversed that decision in Bilski v. Kappos, finding that the "machine-or-transformation" test is not the only test for determining patent eligibility. The Court, however, declined to specify how and when processes are patentable. Most recently, on March 20, 2012, in the case Mayo v. Prometheus, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's application of Bilski and invalidated a patent focused on a diagnostic process because the patent claim embodied a law of nature. On July 3, 2012, the USPTO issued its Interim Guidelines for Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis of Process Claims Involving Laws of Nature in view of the Prometheus decision. It remains to be seen how these guidelines play out in the actual prosecution of diagnostic claims. Similarly, it remains to be seen lower courts will interpret the Prometheus decision. Some aspects of our technology involve processes that may be subject to this evolving standard, and we cannot guarantee that any of our pending process claims will be patentable as a result of such evolving standards.
The U.S. Supreme Court's June 14, 2013 decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad will likely have an impact on the entire biotechnology industry. Specifically, the case involved certain of Myriad Genetics, Inc.'s U.S. patents related to the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Plaintiffs asserted that the breast cancer genes were not patentable subject matter. The Supreme Court unanimously held that the isolated form of naturally occurring DNA molecules does not rise to the level of patent-eligible subject matter. But the Court also held that claims directed to complementary DNA (cDNA) molecules were patent-eligible because cDNA is not naturally occurring. The Supreme Court focused on the informational content of the isolated DNA and determined that the information contained in the isolated DNA molecule was not markedly different from that naturally found in the human chromosome. Yet, in holding isolated cDNA molecules patent-eligible, the Court recognized the differences between human chromosomal DNA and the corresponding cDNA. Because the non-coding regions of naturally occurring chromosomal DNA have been removed in cDNA, the Court accepted that cDNA is not a product of nature and, therefore, is patent-eligible subject matter.

It does not appear that the Supreme Court's ruling in Myriad will adversely affect our current patent portfolio which, unlike the claims at issue in Myriad, centers on algorithmic methods associating chromosomal markers to specific clinical end-points. Nevertheless, we of course need to remain mindful that this is an evolving area of law.

In addition, on February 5, 2010, the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society voted to approve a report entitled “Gene Patents and Licensing Practices and Their Impact on Patient Access to Genetic Tests.” That report defines "patent claims on genes" broadly to include claims to isolated nucleic acid molecules as well as methods of detecting particular sequences or mutations. The report also contains six recommendations, including the creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes, or for anyone using the patent-protected genes in the pursuit of research. The report also recommended that the Secretary should explore, identify and implement mechanisms that will encourage more voluntary adherence to current guidelines that promote nonexclusive in-licensing of diagnostic genetic and genomic technologies. It is unclear whether the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will act upon these recommendations, or if the recommendations would result in a change in law or process that could negatively impact our patent portfolio or future research and development efforts.

WeCompany may become involved in lawsuits or other proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights, which could be time-consuming and costly to defend, and could result in our loss of significant rights and the assessment of treble damages.

From time to time wethe Company may face intellectual property infringement (or misappropriation) claims from third parties. Some of these claims may lead to litigation. The outcome of any such litigation can never be guaranteed, and an adverse outcome could affect usthe Company negatively. For example, were a third-party to succeed on an infringement claim against us, wethe Company, the Company may be required to pay substantial damages (including up to treble damages if such infringement were found to be willful). In addition, wethe Company could face an injunction, barring usthe Company from conducting the allegedly infringing activity. The outcome of the litigation could require usthe Company to enter into a license agreement which may not be pursuant to acceptable or commercially reasonable or practical terms or which

may not be available at all. It is also possible that an adverse finding of infringement against usthe Company may require usthe Company to dedicate substantial resources and time in developing non-infringing alternatives, which may or may not be possible. In the case of diagnostic tests, wethe Company would also need to include non-infringing technologies which would require usthe Company to re-validate our tests. Any such re-validation, in addition to being costly and time consuming, may be unsuccessful.

Furthermore, wethe Company may initiate claims to assert or defend our own intellectual property against third parties. Any intellectual property litigation, irrespective of whether we arethe Company is the plaintiff or the defendant, and regardless of the outcome, is expensive and time-consuming, and could divert our management'smanagement’s attention from ourthe Company's business and negatively affect our operating results or financial condition. WeThe Company may not be able to prevent, alone or with ourthird-party collaborators or suppliers, misappropriation of ourthe Company's proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. In addition, interference proceedings brought by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents and patent applications or those of ourthe Company's current or future collaborators.collaborators, suppliers or customers.

Finally, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of ourthe Company's confidential and proprietary information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial condition.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our technologies in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement rights are not as strong as those in the United States. These products may compete with our technologies in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued patents and our patent claims or other intellectual rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Risks Relating to ourthe Company's International Operations

International expansion of ourthe Company's business exposes usthe Company to business, regulatory, political, operational, financial and economic risks associated with doing business outside of the United States.

OurThe Company's business strategy incorporates international expansion, including our recent acquisitions which have provided us with facilities in India and China,Australia, and the possibility of establishing and maintaining clinician marketing and education capabilities in other locations outside of the United States and expanding our relationships with distributorsbiopharmaceutical, academic and manufacturers.governmental research organizations. Doing business internationally involves a number of risks, including:

multiple, conflicting and changing laws and regulations such as tax and transfer pricing laws, export and import restrictions, employment laws, regulatory requirements and other governmental approvals, permits and licenses;

being subject to additional privacy and cybersecurity laws, including the Australian Privacy Act of 1988;


failure by usthe Company or our distributors to obtain regulatory approvals for the sale or use of our tests in various countries, including failure to achieve "CE Marking"“CE Marking”, a conformity mark which is required to market in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the European Economic Area and which is broadly accepted in other international markets;

difficulties in managing foreign operations;
complexities associated with managing multiple payor-reimbursement regimes or self-pay systems;

logistics and regulations associated with shipping tissue samples, including infrastructure conditions and transportation delays;
limits on our ability to penetrate international markets if our diagnostic tests cannot be processed by an appropriately qualified local laboratory;
financial risks, such as longer payment cycles, difficulty enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable and exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;

reduced protection for intellectual property rights;

natural disasters, political and economic instability, including wars, terrorism and political unrest, outbreak of disease, boycotts, curtailment of trade and other business restrictions; and

failure to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, including its books and records provisions and its anti-bribery provisions, by maintaining accurate information and control over sales and distributors'distributors’ activities.

Any of these risks, if encountered, could significantly harm our future international expansion and operations and, consequently, have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our operations are subject to risks associated with emerging markets, including China and India.

Emerging markets are a significant focus of our growth strategy. The developing nature of these markets presents several risks, including deterioration of social, political, labor, or economic conditions in a country or region, and difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations. Perceived risks associated with investing in emerging markets such as China and India, or a general disruption in the development of such markets could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

A portion of our assets and operations are located in China and we are subject to regulatory, economic, political and other uncertainties in China.

The Chinese government has the ability to exercise significant influence and control over our operations in China. In recent years, the Chinese government has implemented measures for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of corporate governance practices in business enterprises. However, many productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. In addition, the government continues to play a significant role in regulating industrial development by imposing business regulations. It also exercises significant control over the country's economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

There can be no assurance that China's economic, political or legal systems will not develop in a way that becomes detrimental to our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our activities may be materially and adversely affected by changes in China's economic and social conditions and by changes in the policies of the government, such as measures to control inflation, changes in the rates or method of taxation and the imposition of additional restrictions on currency conversion.

Additional factors that we may experience in connection with having operations in China or other foreign countries that may adversely affect our business and results of operations include:

our inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any material agreements;
Chinese restrictions on foreign investment that could impair our ability to conduct our business or acquire or contract with other entities in the future;
restrictions on currency exchange that may limit our ability to use cash flow most effectively or to repatriate our investment;
fluctuations in currency values;
cultural, language and managerial differences that may reduce our overall performance; and
political instability.

A portion of our assets and operations are located in India and we are subject to regulatory, economic, political and other uncertainties in India.

Our Indian subsidiary serves both the research and clinical markets and is based in Hyderabad, India. In the past, the Indian economy has experienced many of the problems that commonly confront the economies of developing countries, including high inflation, erratic gross domestic product growth and shortages of foreign exchange. The Indian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment

to particular industries, and Indian government actions concerning the economy could have a material adverse effect on private sector entities like us.

India has experienced significant economic growth over the last several years, but faces major challenges in sustaining that growth in the years ahead. These challenges include the need for substantial infrastructure development. India has also recently experienced civil unrest and terrorism and has been involved in conflicts with neighboring countries. In recent years, there have been military confrontations between India and Pakistan that have occurred in the region of Kashmir and along the India-Pakistan border. If India becomes engaged in armed hostilities, particularly if these hostilities are protracted or involve the threat of or use of weapons of mass destruction, it is likely that our operations would be materially adversely affected.

Our financial performance may be adversely affected by general economic conditions and economic and fiscal policy in India, including changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates and taxation policies, as well as social stability and political, economic or diplomatic developments affecting India in the future.

OurCompany's operating results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and restrictions on the deployment of cash across our global operations.

Although we report ourthe Company reports operating results in U.S. dollars, a portion of ourthe Company's revenues and expenses are or will be denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.dollar, particularly in Australia and Europe. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can have a number of adverse effects on us.the Company. Because ourthe Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, wethe Company must translate revenues, expenses and income, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. Therefore, changes in the value of the U.S. dollar against other currencies will affect our revenues, income from operations, other income (expense), net and the value of balance sheet items originally denominated in other currencies. There is no guarantee that ourthe Company's financial results will not be adversely affected by currency exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, in some countries wethe Company could be subject to strict restrictions on the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies, which could limit ourthe Company's ability to use these funds across ourits global operations.

WeThe Company could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other worldwide anti-bribery laws.

The FCPA and anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or other commercial advantage. OurThe Company's policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, which often carry substantial penalties, including criminal and civil fines, potential loss of export licenses, possible suspension of the ability to do business with the federal government, denial of government reimbursement for products and exclusion from participation in government health care programs. WeThe Company may operate in jurisdictions such as India and China that have experienced governmental and private sector corruption to some degree, and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with certain local customs and practices. WeThe Company cannot assure that ourthe internal control policies and procedures always will protect usthe Company from reckless or other inappropriate acts committed by our affiliates, employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's business, financial position and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Ourthe Company's Common Stock

The price of ourthe Company's common stock has been and could remain volatile, and the market price of our common stock may decrease.

The market price of ourthe Company's common stock has historically experienced and may continue to experience significant volatility. From January 20142015 through December 31, 2016,March 27, 2020, the market price of ourthe Company's common stock has fluctuated from a high of $20.00$382.50 per share in the firstthird quarter of 2014,2015, to a low of $1.10$2.00 per share in the fourth quarter of 2016.2019. Market prices for securities of development-stage life sciences companies have historically been particularly volatile. The factors that may cause the market price of ourthe Company's common stock to fluctuate include, but are not limited to:
 

progress, or lack of progress, in developing and commercializing ourthe Company's proprietary tests;
favorable or unfavorable decisions about our tests or services from government regulators, insurance companies or other third-party payors;
ourthe Company's ability to recruit and retain qualified regulatory and research and development personnel;
changes in investors' and securities analysts' perception of the business risks and conditions of our business;
changes in our relationship with key collaborators;collaborators, suppliers, customers and third parties;
changes in the market valuation or earnings of our competitors or companies viewed as similar to us;

the Company;
changes in key personnel;
depth of the trading market in ourthe Company's common stock;
changes in ourthe Company's capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
the granting or exercise of employee stock options or other equity awards;
realization of any of the risks described under this section titled “Risk Factors”; and
general market and economic conditions.

In addition, the equity markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for the securities of newly public companies for a number of reasons, including reasons that may be unrelated to our business or operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may result in a material decline in the market price of ourthe Company's common stock and you may not be able to sell your shares at prices you deem acceptable. In the past, following periods of volatility in the equity markets, securities class action lawsuits have been instituted against public companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us,the Company, could result in substantial cost and the diversion of management attention.

Our stockholders may be diluted by exercises of outstanding options and warrants.

As of March 22, 2017 we had outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 2,532,734 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $7.85 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 7,475,961 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.61 per share. The exercise of such outstanding options and warrants will result in dilution of the value of our shares.

Reports published by securities or industry analysts, including projections in those reports that exceed our actual results, could adversely affect ourthe Company's common stock price and trading volume.

Securities research analysts establish and publish their own periodic projections for ourthe Company's business. These projections may vary widely from one another and may not accurately predict the results wethe Company actually achieve. Ourachieves. The Company's stock price may decline if ourthe actual results do not match securities research analysts'analysts’ projections. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who writes reports on usthe Company downgrades ourthe Company's stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about ourthe Company's business, our stock price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our companythe Company or fails to publish reports on usthe Company regularly, ourthe Company's stock price or trading volume could decline. While we expectthe Company expects securities research analyst coverage, if no securities or industry analysts begin to cover us,the Company, the trading price for ourthe Company's stock and the trading volume could be adversely affected.

Our directors and executive officers have substantial influence over us and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.

Our directors and executive officers, together with their affiliates, in the aggregate beneficially own approximately 22.3% of our outstanding common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding on December 31, 2016. These stockholders, acting together, haveThe Company is incurring significant influence over the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, have significant influence over our management and affairs. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might harm the market price of our common stock by:
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control;
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and any decision on our part to comply only with certain reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and, for as long as we continue to be an “emerging growth company,” we intend to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as discussed below, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.0 billion or more; (ii) December 31, 2018, which is the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the completion of our initial public offering; (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; and (iv) the date on which

we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC. We have irrevocably chosen to "opt out" of the extended transition periods available under the JOBS Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. We intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved, and if we do take advantage of these exemptions, we cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any choices to take advantage of these reduced disclosure obligations, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We are incurring significantly increased costs and devotedevotes substantial management time as a result of operating as a public company particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.

As a public company, and particularly after we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” we arethe Company is incurring significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company and which may increase after we are no longer an "emerging growth company."expenses. For example, in addition to being required to comply with certain requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will bethe Company is required to comply with certain requirements of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. We expectThe Company expects that compliance with these requirements will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time consuming and costly. In addition, we expectthe Company expects that our management and other personnel will continue to need to divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time to these public company requirements.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintainthe Company maintains effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, wethe Company must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” provided that we are not then stillif the Company loses status as a “smaller reporting company,” wethe Company will be required to have ourthe Company's independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. OurThe Company's compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as applicable, requires usthe Company to incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. WeThe Company currently dodoes not have an internal audit group, and wethe Company will need to continue to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. If wethe Company or ourthe independent registered public accounting firm identify deficiencies in ourthe Company's internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of ourthe Company's stock could decline and wethe Company could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NASDAQ, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

OurThe Company's ability to successfully implement ourthe Company's business plan and maintain compliance with Section 404, as applicable, requires usthe Company to be able to prepare timely and accurate financial statements. We expectThe Company expects that wethe Company will need to continue to improve existing, and implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls

to manage ourthe Company's business effectively. Any delay in the implementation of, or disruption in the transition to, new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, may cause our operations to suffer and wethe Company may be unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective and to obtain an unqualified report on internal controls from ourthe Company's auditors as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we failthe Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, wethe Company may not be able to accurately report our financial results, and current and potential stockholders may lose confidence in ourthe Company's financial reporting. This, in turn, could have an adverse impact on trading prices for ourthe Company's common stock, and could adversely affect ourthe Company's ability to access the capital markets.

Anti-takeover provisions of ourthe Company's certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law could make an acquisition of us,the Company, which may be beneficial to ourthe Company's stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by ourthe Company's stockholders to replace or remove the current members of ourthe board and management.

Certain provisions of ourthe Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change of control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. Furthermore, these provisions could prevent or frustrate attempts by ourthe Company's stockholders to replace or remove members of ourthe board of directors. These provisions also could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for ourthe Company's common stock, thereby depressing the market price of ourthe Company's common stock. Stockholders who wish to participate in these transactions may not have the opportunity to do so. These provisions, among other things:
 

allowauthorize the authorized number of directors to be changed only by resolution of our board of directors;
authorize our board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock, the rights of which will be determined at the discretion of the board of directors and that, if issued, could operate as a "poison pill"“poison pill” to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer to prevent an acquisition that ourthe board of directors does not approve;

establish advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations to ourthe board of directors or for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings; and

limit who may call a stockholder meeting.

In addition, we arethe Company is governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, which may, unless certain criteria are met, prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of the voting rights on ourthe Company's common stock, from merging or combining with usthe Company for a prescribed period of time.

Because we dothe Company does not expect to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future, you must rely on appreciation of ourthe Company's common stock price for any return on your investment. Even if we changethe Company changes that policy, wethe Company may be restricted from paying dividends on ourthe Company's common stock.

We doThe Company does not intend to pay cash dividends on shares of our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of ourthe board of directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial performance, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors ourthe board of directors deems relevant. Accordingly, you will have to rely on capital appreciation, if any, to earn a return on your investment in ourthe Company's common stock. Investors seeking cash dividends in the foreseeable future should not purchase ourthe Company's common stock.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

Our ability to utilize our federal net operating loss, carryforwards and federal tax credits are limited under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The limitations apply since we have experienced an “ownership change,” as defined by Section 382, as a result of the Company's securities offerings. Generally, an ownership change occurs if the percentage of the value of the stock that is owned by one or more direct or indirect “five percent shareholders” changes by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage at any time during the applicable testing period (typically three years). Since we have experienced an “ownership change”, our NOL carryforwards and federal tax credits are subject to limitations as to our ability to utilize them to offset taxable income and related income taxes. In addition, future changes in our stock ownership, which may be outside of our control, may trigger further “ownership changes” which would further limit their utilization. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset United States federal taxable income and related income taxes are subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us.

Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of The NASDAQ Capital Market could result in a de-listing of our common stock.

If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of The NASDAQ Capital Market, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, NASDAQ may take steps to de-list our common stock. Such a de-listing would likely have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock when you wish to do so. In the event of a de-listing, we would take actions to restore our compliance with NASDAQ's listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the NASDAQ minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with NASDAQ listing requirements.


Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.Properties

As of December 31, 2016, we2019, the Company had a leaseleases for approximately 17,9005,800 square feet of officein Hershey, Pennsylvania and laboratory space1,959 square feet in Rutherford, New Jersey, 24,900Bundoora, Australia and a license to use 994 square feet of laboratory space locatedfacilities in Research Triangle Park (RTP) in Morrisville, North Carolina,

10,000 square feet of laboratory space in Hyderabad, India, 2,700 square feet of laboratory space in Shanghai, China and approximately 19,100 square feet of laboratory space in Los Angeles, California. WeClayton, Australia. The lease agreements have escalating lease agreements for both our New Jerseypayments and North Carolina spaces which expire in November 2020 and July 2021, respectively, and the license agreement has a flat license fee subject to Consumer Price Index-based adjustment and expires in October 2024.

In 2020, the Company began leasing a laboratory in Gilles Plains, SA and an administrative office in Modbury, SA. These leases expire in January 2023 and February 2018 and May 2020,2023, respectively. We also have a lease agreement for our California space which expires on December 31, 2017.
 

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

In the normal courseOn April 5, 2018 and April 12, 2018, purported stockholders of business, the Company filed nearly identical putative class action lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, against the Company, Panna L. Sharma, John A. Roberts, and Igor Gitelman, captioned Ben Phetteplace v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-05612 and Ruo Fen Zhang v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-06353, respectively. The complaints alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 based on allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's business, operational, and financial results. The lawsuits sought, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in connection with purchases of the Company's stock between March 23, 2017 and April 2, 2018, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On August 28, 2018, the Court consolidated the two actions in one action captioned In re Cancer Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation (the “Securities Litigation”) and appointed shareholder Randy Clark as the lead plaintiff. On October 30, 2018, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, adding Edward Sitar as a defendant and seeking, among other things, compensatory damages in connection with purchases of CGI stock between March 10, 2016 and April 2, 2018. On December 31, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim. The Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss during the oral argument and on February 25, 2020, the Court issued a written order dismissing the case with prejudice. The Lead Plaintiff has not appealed the dismissal.

In addition, on June 1, 2018, September 20, 2018, and September 25, 2018, purported stockholders of the Company filed nearly identical derivative lawsuits on behalf of the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company (as a nominal defendant) and current and former members of the Company’s Board of Directors and current and former officers of the Company. The three cases are captioned: Bell v. Sharma et al., No. 2:18-cv-10009-CCC-MF, McNeece v. Pappajohn et al., No. 2:18-cv-14093, and Workman v. Pappajohn, et al., No. 2:18-cv-14259 (the “Derivative Litigation”). The complaints allege claims for breach of fiduciary duty, violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (premised upon alleged omissions in the Company’s 2017 proxy statement), and unjust enrichment, and allege that the individual defendants failed to implement and maintain adequate controls, which resulted in ineffective disclosure controls and procedures, and conspired to conceal this alleged failure. The lawsuits seek, among other things, damages and/or restitution to the Company, appropriate equitable relief to remedy the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On November 9, 2018, the Court in the Bell v. Sharma action entered a stipulation filed by the parties staying the Bell action until the Securities Litigation is dismissed, with prejudice, and all appeals have been exhausted; or the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Securities Litigation is denied in whole or in part; or either of the parties in the Bell action gives 30 days’ notice that they no longer consent to the stay. On December 10, 2018, the parties in the McNeece action filed a stipulation that is substantially identical to the Bell stipulation. On February 1, 2019, the Court in the Workman action granted a stipulation that is substantially identical to the Bell stipulation. On May 15, 2020, the plaintiff’s in the Workman action filed a notice of voluntary dismissal to the original action. The plaintiff’s in the McNeece action sent an identical notice that they intend to file a similar notice of voluntary dismissal to their original action. Based upon the above dismissal of the securities class action litigation, the Company anticipates the plaintiffs in the remaining derivative lawsuit may be involved involuntarily dismiss their action as well. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the Derivative Litigation and therefore cannot estimate possible losses or ranges of losses, if any. The Company is expensing legal proceedings or threatened legal proceedings. We are not party to any legal proceedings or aware of any threatened legal proceedings which are expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.costs associated with the loss contingency as incurred.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices of ourCompany's common stock trades on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

  High Low
4th Quarter 2016
 $1.98
 $1.10
3rd Quarter 2016
 $2.73
 $1.72
2nd Quarter 2016
 $2.93
 $1.82
1st Quarter 2016
 $3.38
 $1.90
     
4th Quarter 2015
 $8.51
 $2.75
3rd Quarter 2015
 $12.75
 $7.57
2nd Quarter 2015
 $12.22
 $7.57
1st Quarter 2015
 $9.76
 $6.55
Market under the symbol “CGIX.”

Holders

As of December 31, 2016, we2019, the Company had approximately 9535 holders of record of ourthe Company's common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of ourthe transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of ourthe Company's common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust, 17 Battery Place, 8th Floor, New York, New York, 10004.

Dividends

We haveThe Company has never declared dividends on ourthe Company's equity securities, and currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of ourthe Company's common stock in the foreseeable future. We expectThe Company expects to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of ourthe Company's business. OurThe Company's loan agreements prohibit usthe Company from paying cash dividends on ourthe Company's common stock and the terms of any future loan agreement we enteragreements the Company enters into or any debt securities wethe Company may issue are likely to contain similar restrictions on the payment of dividends. Subject to the foregoing, the payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of ourthe board of directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our overall financial condition and any other factors deemed relevant by ourthe board of directors.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 regarding shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans, including our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) as well as shares issued outside of these plans.
  Equity Compensation Plan Information  
Plan Category 
(a)
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
and rights(1)
 
(b)
Weighted Average
exercise price of
outstanding options
and rights
 
(c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plan
(excluding securities
referenced in column (a))
  
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2) 2,162,073
 $9.07
 1,211,609
 (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (4) 36,000
 $10.00
 
   
Total 2,198,073
 $9.09
 1,211,609
  
 __________________________________

(1)Does not include any restricted stock as such shares are already reflected in our outstanding shares.
(2)Consists of the 2008 Plan and the 2011 Plan.
(3)Includes securities available for future issuance under the 2008 Plan and the 2011 Plan.
(4)These options were issued to one of our current board members in connection with consulting services.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

The selected financial data set forth below as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for the years then ended has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We derived the consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Not applicable.

The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and other financial information included herein. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
  (in thousands, expect per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:          
Revenue $27,049
 $18,040
 $10,199
 $6,610
 $4,302
Cost of revenues 17,104
 14,098
 8,453
 4,925
 3,929
Gross profit (loss) 9,945
 3,942
 1,746
 1,685
 373
Operating expenses:          
Research and development 5,967
 5,483
 4,622
 2,190
 2,112
General and administrative 16,034
 14,567
 12,369
 6,115
 4,503
Sales and marketing 4,668
 5,269
 3,964
 1,842
 1,399
Total operating expenses 26,669
 25,319
 20,955
 10,147
 8,014
Loss from operations (16,724) (21,377) (19,209) (8,462) (7,641)
Other income (expense):          
Interest expense (454) (344) (473) (2,388) (4,701)
Interest income 23
 49
 74
 30
 
Change in fair value of warrant liability 1,525
 35
 417
 4,633
 7,538
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable 152
 269
 198
 
 
Loss on debt and warrant restructuring 
 
 
 
 (1,862)
Other expense (325) 
 
 (6,850) 
Total other income (expense) 921
 9
 216
 (4,575) 975
Loss before income taxes (15,803) (21,368) (18,993) (13,037) (6,666)
Income tax (benefit) 
 (1,184) (2,350) (664) 
Net (loss) $(15,803) $(20,184) $(16,643) $(12,373) $(6,666)
Basic net (loss) per share $(1.00) $(1.96) $(1.76) $(2.65) $(4.97)
Diluted net (loss) per share $(1.00) $(1.96) $(1.80) $(3.64) $(10.55)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 15,861
 10,298
 9,449
 4,665
 1,342
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 15,861
 10,299
 9,462
 4,676
 1,346
           
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: (in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents $9,502
 $19,459
 $25,554
 $49,460
 $820
Working capital (deficit) 12,378
 18,333
 27,389
 43,272
 (9,612)
Total assets 42,434
 48,884
 47,105
 55,157
 8,952
Debt, excluding current portion 2,654
 4,642
 6,000
 
 8,441
Accumulated deficit (113,954) (98,151) (77,967) (61,325) (48,935)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) $25,624
 $33,017
 $34,554
 $45,463
 $(23,981)

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As used herein, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms, refer“Company” refers to Cancer Genetics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Cancer Genetics Italia, S.r.l., Gentris, LLC, and BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited,vivoPharm Pty, Ltd., except as expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help facilitate an understanding of ourthe Company's financial condition and ourits historical results of operations for the periods presented. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this annual report on Form10-K.Form 10-K. This MD&A may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. For a discussion on forward-looking statements, see the information set forth in the Introductory Note to this Annual Report under the caption “Forward Looking Statements”, which information is incorporated herein by reference. The share numbers in the following discussion reflect a 1-for-30 reverse stock split that the Company effected October 24, 2019.

Overview

We areThe Company is focused on supporting the efforts of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries to develop innovative new drug therapies. Until the closing of the Business Disposals (as defined below) in July 2019, the Company was an emerging leader in enabling precision medicine in oncology by providing multi-disciplinary diagnostic and data solutions, facilitating individualized therapies through the Company's diagnostic tests, services and molecular markers. Following the Business Disposals, the Company currently has an extensive set of anti-tumor referenced data based on predictive xenograft and syngeneic tumor models from the acquisition of vivoPharm, Pty Ltd. (“vivoPharm”) in 2017, to provide Discovery Services such as contract research services, focused primarily on unique specialized studies to guide drug discovery and development programs in the oncology and immuno-oncology fields.

The Company offers preclinical services such as predictive tumor models, human orthotopic xenografts and syngeneic immuno-oncology relevant tumor models in its U.S. operations, and is a leader in the field of precision medicine, enabling individualized therapiesimmuno-oncology preclinical services for its global customers. This service is supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in the fieldCompany's Australia-based operations.

Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $3.2 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of oncology through our diagnostic products$3.9 million at December 31, 2019, an increase of $3.7 million from December 31, 2018. The Company has working capital from continuing operations at December 31, 2019 of $1.4 million. In addition, the Company has $1.2 million of liabilities associated with its discontinuing operations that will be funded primarily from its continuing operations.

The Company does not project that cash at December 31, 2019 will be sufficient to fund normal operations for the twelve months from the issuance of these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on reduced losses and improved future cash flows. Alternatively, the Company may be required to raise additional equity or debt capital, or consummate other strategic transactions. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company can provide no assurance that these actions will be successful or that additional sources of financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Business Disposals - Discontinuing Operations

BioServe Biotechnologies

On April 26, 2018, the Company sold its India subsidiary, BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited (“BioServe”) to Reprocell, Inc., for $1.8 million.

siParadigm, Inc.

On July 5, 2019, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Clinical Agreement”) by and among the Company and siParadigm, LLC (“siParadigm”), pursuant to which the Company sold to siParadigm certain assets associated with the Company’s clinical laboratory business (the “Clinical Business,” and such assets, the “Designated Assets”) and agreed to cease operating the Clinical Business. The Designated Assets include intellectual property, equipment and customer lists associated with the Clinical Business, and for a period the Company was providing certain transitional services to siParadigm pursuant to the Clinical Agreement. The cash consideration paid by siParadigm at closing was $747 thousand, which includes $45 thousand for certain equipment plus a $1.0 million advance payment of the Earn-Out (as defined below), less $177 thousand of supplier invoices paid directly by siParadigm, an adjustment of $11 thousand and transaction costs of $110 thousand. The Earn-Out, to be paid over

the 24 months post-closing, is based on fees for all tests performed by siParadigm for the Company’s clinical customers during the 12-month period following the closing (the “Earn-Out”). The Clinical Business sale (together with the BioPharma Disposal defined below, the “Business Disposals”) was completed on July 8, 2019.

Interpace Biosciences, Inc.

On July 15, 2019, the Company entered into a secured creditor asset purchase agreement (the “BioPharma Agreement”) by and among the Company, Gentris, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”), Interpace Biosciences, Inc. (“IDXG”) and a newly-formed subsidiary of IDXG, Interpace BioPharma, Inc. (“Buyer”). The BioPharma Agreement provided for a consensual private foreclosure sale by PFG of all assets relating to the Company’s BioPharma Business (as defined in the BioPharma Agreement) to Buyer (the “BioPharma Disposal”). The BioPharma Disposal was consummated on July 15, 2019.

Pursuant to the BioPharma Agreement, Buyer purchased from PFG certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Company relating to the BioPharma Business, providing as gross consideration $23.5 million, less certain closing adjustments totaling $2.0 million, of which $7.7 million was settled in the form of a promissory note issued by Buyer to the Company (the “Excess Consideration Note”) and the remainder was paid to PFG in cash. PFG utilized the cash proceeds to satisfy the outstanding balances of the Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) asset-based revolving line of credit (“ABL”) and the $6.0 million term note to PFG (“PFG Term Note”), and to satisfy certain transaction expenses. The balance of $2.3 million was delivered to the Company in addition to the Excess Consideration Note. The Excess Consideration Note which required interest-only quarterly payments at a rate of 6% per year, was settled on October 24, 2019 for $6.0 million, including interest of $24 thousand. The Buyer withheld from the settlement of the Excess Consideration Note $775 thousand for a net worth adjustment (assets less liabilities) of the BioPharma business (“Net Worth”), $153 thousand to secure collection of certain older accounts receivable of the Company purchased by Buyer (“AR Holdback”) and an additional $735 thousand as security for indemnification obligations of the Company for any breaches of certain limited warranties and covenants of the Company and other specified items, subject to agreed-upon caps, baskets and survival periods as set forth in the BioPharma Agreement (“Indemnification Holdback”). The Company received the full amounts of the AR Holdback and the Indemnification Holdback in April and May 2020, respectively.

The Company and Buyer also entered into a transition services agreement (the “TSA”) pursuant to which the Company and Buyer are providing certain services to each other to accommodate the transition of the BioPharma Business to Buyer. In particular, the Company agreed to provide to Buyer, among other things, certain personnel services, payroll processing, administration services and molecular markers. We develop, commercializebenefit administration services (collectively, the “Payroll and provide molecular-Benefits Services”), for a period not to exceed six months from July 15, 2019, subject to the terms and biomarker-based tests and services that enable physicians to personalize the clinical management of each individual patient by providing genomic information to better diagnose, monitor and inform cancer treatment and that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged in oncology trials to better select candidate populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing information regarding genomic factors influencing subject responses to therapeutics. We have a comprehensive, disease-focused oncology testing portfolio. Our tests and techniques target a wide range of cancers, covering nineconditions of the top ten cancersTSA, in prevalenceexchange for payment or reimbursement, as applicable, by Buyer for the costs related thereto, including salaries and benefits for certain of the Company’s BioPharma employees during the transition period. The Company continues to provide the Payroll and Benefits Services under the TSA with respect to a limited number of employees. In addition, the Buyer is reimbursing the Company, in part, for the salaries and benefits of John A. Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Glenn Miles, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

The above business disposals have been classified as discontinuing operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States with additional unique capabilities offered by our FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test for identifying difficultAmerica. Accordingly, the operations and balances of BioServe and the Company's BioPharma and Clinical operations have been reported as discontinuing operations. Unless otherwise indicated, information in the MD&A relates to diagnose tumor types or poorly differentiated metastatic disease.continuing operations.

Our vision is to become the oncology diagnostics partner for pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinicians by participating in the entire care continuum from bench to bedside. We believe the oncology industry is undergoing a rapid evolution in its approach to diagnostic, prognostic and theranostic testing, embracing precision medicine and individualized testing as a means to drive higher standards of patient treatment and disease management. Similarly, pharmaceutical and biotech companies are increasingly working with precision diagnostic and molecular technology providers such as CGI to provide molecular profiles on clinical trial participants. These profiles may help identify biomarker and genomic variations that may be responsible for differing responses to oncology therapies, thereby increasing the efficiency of trials while lowering costs. We believe tailored and combination therapies can revolutionize oncology care through molecular- and biomarker-based testing services, enabling physicians and researchers to target the factors that make each patient and disease unique.2019 Offerings

Our services are performed at our state-of-the-art laboratories located in New Jersey, North Carolina, California, Shanghai (China), In January 2019, the Company closed two public offerings and Hyderabad, India. Our laboratories comply with the highest regulatory standards as appropriateissued an aggregate of 952 thousand shares of common stock for the services they deliver including CLIA, CAP, NY State, California State$5.4 million, net of expenses and NABL (India)discounts of $1.1 million. Our services are built on a foundation of world-class scientific knowledge and intellectual property in solid and blood-borne cancers, as well as strong academic relationships with major cancer centers such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Mayo Clinic, and the National Cancer Institute.

The Company also issuedOur clinical offerings include our portfolio of proprietary tests targeting hematological, urogenital and HPV-associated cancers, 67 thousand warrants to its underwriters in conjunction with ancillary non-proprietary tests. Our proprietary tests target cancers that are difficult to prognose and predict treatment outcomes through currently available mainstream techniques. We provide our proprietary tests and services, along with a comprehensive range of non-proprietary oncology-focused tests and laboratory services, to oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician offices, as well as biotech and pharmaceutical companies to support their clinical trials. Our proprietary tests are based principally on our expertise in specific cancer types, test development methodologies and proprietary algorithms correlating genetic events with disease specific information. Our portfolio primarily includes comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarrays and next generation sequencing (NGS) panels, gene expression tests, and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.these offerings.

The non-proprietary testing services we offer are focused in part on specific oncology categories where we are developing our proprietary tests. We believe that there is significant synergy in developing and marketing a complete set of tests and services that are disease focused and delivering those tests and services in a comprehensive mannerNote Payable to help with treatment decisions. The insight that we develop in delivering the non-proprietary services are often leveraged in the development of our proprietary programs and now increasingly in the validation of our proprietary programs, such as MatBA and Focus::NGS.Atlas Sciences, LLC


We expect to continue to incur material losses for the near future. We incurred losses of $15.8 million and $20.2 million for fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $114.0 million. 

Acquisitions

On October 9, 2015, we acquired substantially all21, 2019, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Atlas Sciences, LLC (“Atlas Sciences”), an affiliate of the assets of Response Genetics, Inc.Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (“Response Genetics”Iliad”), now referred to as CGI West, with its principal place of business in California, for aggregate$1.3 million (“Note Payable”). The Company received consideration of approximately $12.9 million.
$1.3 million, reflecting an original issue discount of $88 thousand and expenses payable by the Company of $10 thousand. The Note Payable has a 12-month term and bears interest at 10% per annum. The proceeds from the Note Payable were utilized to partially repay the Convertible Note (see Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Key Factors Affecting ourthe Company's Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Our overall long-term growth planThe Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, vivoPharm, provides proprietary preclinical oncology and immuno-oncology services, offering integrated services in different disease areas to the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. vivoPharm is predicated on our abilitya leader in orthotopic and metastases tumor models. The Company provides all services including toxicology testing and bioanalytical analysis to developGLP. vivoPharm specializes in conducting studies tailored to guide drug development, starting from compound libraries and commercialize our proprietary tests, penetrate the Pharmaceuticalending with a comprehensive set of in vitro and Biotechnology (Biopharma) community to achieve more revenue supporting clinical trialsin vivo data and develop and penetrate the Indian market. Our proprietary tests include CGH microarrays, NGS panels, gene expression tests and DNA FISH probes. We continue to develop additional proprietary tests. To facilitate market adoption of our proprietary tests, we anticipate having to successfully complete additional studies with clinical samples and publish our results in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Ourreports, as needed for Investigational New Drug (IND) filing.

The Company's ability to complete such studies is dependent upon ourits ability to leverage ourits collaborative relationships with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and leading institutions to facilitate ourits research and obtain data for ourits quality assurance and test validation efforts.

We believeThe Company believes that the factors discussed in the following paragraphs have had and are expected to continue to have a material impact on ourits results of operations and financial condition.

Revenues from Continuing Operations

Our revenue is primarily generated through our Clinical Services and Biopharma Services. Clinical Services can be billed to Medicare, another third party insurer orRevenue from the referring community hospital or other healthcare facility or patients in accordance with state and federal law. Biopharma Services are billed to the customer directly. While we have agreements with our Biopharma clients, volumes from these clients are subject to the progression and continuation of the clinical trials which can impact testing volume. We also derive limited revenue fromCompany's Discovery Services which arecomes from preclinical oncology and immuno-oncology services providedoffered to its biotechnology and pharmaceutical customers.  The Company is a leader in the development of neworthotopic and metastases tumor models and offer whole body imaging, in addition to toxicology testing assays and methods.bioanalytical analysis. Discovery Services are billed directlydesigned to the customer.specialize in conducting studies tailored to guide drug development, starting from compound libraries and ending with a comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo data and reports, as needed for Investigational New Drug (IND) filing.

We have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of test ordering sites, although the test ordering sites that generate a significant portion of our revenue have changed from period to period. Test ordering sites account for all of our Clinical Services revenue along with a portion of the Biopharma Services revenue. Our test ordering sites are hospitals, cancer centers, reference laboratories, physician offices, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Oncologists and pathologists at these sites order the tests on behalf of the needs of their oncology patients or as part of a clinical trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company in which the patient is being enrolled.

The top five test ordering clients during 2016 and 2015 accounted for 31% and 49%, respectively, of our testing volumes, with 6% and 18%, respectively, of the test volume coming from community hospitals. During the year ended December 31, 2016, one Biopharma client2019, three customers accounted for approximately 16%61% of our revenue.the consolidated revenue from continuing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2015 one Biopharma client2018, three customers accounted for approximately 19%53% of our revenue. The loss of our largest client would materially adversely affect our results of operations, however the loss of any other test ordering client would not materially adversely affect our results ofconsolidated revenue from continuing operations.

We receive revenue for our Clinical Services from Medicare, other insurance carriers and other healthcare facilities.  Some of our customers choose, generally at the beginning of our relationship, to pay for laboratory services directly as opposed to having patients (or their insurers) pay for those services and providing us with the patients’ insurance information.  A hospital may elect to be a direct bill customer and pay our bills directly, or may provide us with patient information so that their patients pay our bills, in which case we generally expect payment from their private insurance carrier or Medicare. In a few instances, we have arrangements where a hospital may have two accounts with us, so that certain tests are billed directly to the hospital, and certain tests are billed to and paid by a patient’s insurer. The billing arrangements generally are dictated by our customers and in accordance with state and federal law.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, Medicare accounted for approximately 14% of our total revenue, other insurance accounted for approximately 20% of our total revenue and other healthcare facilities accounted for 5% of our total revenue. On average, we generate less revenue per test from other healthcare facilities billed directly, than from other insurance payors. 

Cost of Revenues from Continuing Operations

OurThe Company's cost of revenues consists principally of internal personnel costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, laboratory consumables, shipping costs, overhead and other direct expenses, such as specimen procurement and third partythird-party validation studies. We are pursuingThe Company continues to pursue various strategies to reduce and control ourits cost of revenues, including automating ourthe Company's processes through more efficient technology and attempting to negotiate improved terms with ourits suppliers. In 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Response Genetics in California. Overall, with three acquisitions completed, we have made significant progress with integrating our resources and services and leveraging enterprise wide purchasing power to gain supplier discounts, in an effort to reduce costs. We will continue to assess other possible advantages to help us improve our cost structure.

Operating Expenses from Continuing Operations

We classify ourThe Company classifies its operating expenses into threefive categories: research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative. Ouradministrative, impairment of goodwill and merger costs. The Company's operating expenses principally consist of personnel costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, outside services, laboratory consumables and overhead, development costs, marketing program costs and legal and accounting fees.

Research and Development Expenses. We incur researchResearch and development expenses principally in connection with our effortsfrom continuing operations relate to develop our proprietary tests. Our primary research and development expenses consistthe Company's allocation of direct personnel costs, laboratory equipment and consumables and overhead expenses. In 2013, we entered into alosses from its joint venture with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, with a focus on developing oncology diagnostic services and tests utilizing next generation sequencing. These efforts continued throughout 2015 and 2016. All research and development expenses are charged to operationsResearch. The Company was in the periods they are incurred.process of winding down the joint venture during 2019, and the joint venture was dissolved in February 2020.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist principally of personnel-related expenses, professional fees, such as legal, accounting and business consultants, occupancy costs, bad debt and other general expenses. We have incurred increases in our general and administrative expenses and anticipate further increases as we expand our business operations.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. OurThe Company's sales and marketing expenses consist principally of personnel and related overhead costs for our salesits business development team and their support personnel, travel and entertainment expenses, and other selling costs including sales collaterals and trade shows. We expect ourThe Company expects its sales and marketing expenses to increaseremain relatively flat as we expand into new geographiesit continues to operate and add new clinical tests and services.grow its Discovery Services business.

SeasonalityImpairment of Goodwill: During 2019, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2.9 million after considering the effects of the Business Disposals and declines in its stock price.  If the Company is not successful in executing its strategic business plans, there may be further impairments in the future.

Our business experiences decreased demand during spring vacation season, summer monthsMerger Costs. In the pursuit of various strategic options for the Company, legal and other professional costs are incurred while evaluating, negotiating, executing and implementing merger and acquisition alternatives.


Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. In addition, as the Company is located in New Jersey, the Company is currently under a shelter-in-place mandate and many of its customers worldwide are similarly impacted. The global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve, and the December holiday season when patientsextent to which COVID-19 may impact the Company's business will depend on future developments, which are less likelyhighly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to visit theircontain and treat the disease. As a healthcare provider, the Company is still providing Discovery Services and has yet to experience a slowdown in its project work, however, the future of many projects may be delayed. The Company continues to vigilantly monitor the situation with its primary focus on the health care providers. We expect this trend in seasonality to continue for the foreseeable future.and safety of its employees and clients.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

The following table sets forth certain information concerning ourthe Company's results of continuing operations for the periods shown:

shown (in thousands): 
 Year Ended December 31, Change Year Ended December 31, Change
 2016 2015 $ % 2019 2018 $ %
(dollars in thousands)        
        
Revenue $27,049
 $18,040
 $9,009
 50 % $7,305
 $4,932
 $2,373
 48 %
Cost of revenues 17,104
 14,098
 3,006
 21 % 3,701
 3,090
 611
 20 %
Research and development expenses 5,967
 5,483
 484
 9 %
General and administrative expenses 16,034
 14,567
 1,467
 10 %
Sales and marketing expenses 4,668
 5,269
 (601) -11 %
Total operating loss $(16,724) $(21,377) $4,653
 -22 %
Interest (expense) (431) (295) (136) 46 %
Research and development 
 154
 (154) -100 %
General and administrative 5,171
 6,716
 (1,545) -23 %
Sales and marketing 1,146
 1,197
 (51) -4 %
Impairment of goodwill 2,873
 
 2,873
 N/A
Merger costs 117
 1,464
 (1,347) -92 %
Loss from continuing operations (5,703) (7,689) 1,986
 -26 %
Interest expense, net (1,329) (298) (1,031) 346 %
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable 4
 136
 (132) -97 %
Change in fair value of other derivatives 86
 (86) 172
 -200 %
Change in fair value of warrant liability 1,525
 35
 1,490
 4,257 % 70
 3,732
 (3,662) -98 %
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable 152
 269
 (117) -43 %
Change in fair value of siParadigm Earn-Out (935) 
 (935) N/A
Change in fair value of Excess Consideration Note 93
 
 93
 N/A
Gain on troubled debt restructuring 258
 
 258
 N/A
Other expense (325) 
 (325) N/A
 59
 
 59
 N/A
Loss before income taxes (15,803) (21,368) 5,565
 -26 % (7,397) (4,205) (3,192) 76 %
Income tax benefit 
 1,184
 (1,184) -100 % 512
 
 512
 N/A
Net loss $(15,803) $(20,184) $4,381
 -22 %
Net loss from continuing operations $(6,885) $(4,205) $(2,680) 64 %

RevenueNon-GAAP Financial Information

In addition to disclosing financial results in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the table below contains non-GAAP financial measures that the Company believes are helpful in understanding and comparing its past financial performance and its future results, and are reflected as "Adjusted EBITDA." The breakdownCompany uses Adjusted EBITDA to normalize its operations. The Company defined adjusted EBITDA as earnings before (1) net interest expense, (2) taxes, (3) depreciation and amortization, (4) non-cash stock-based compensation, (5) goodwill impairment, (7) gain on troubled debt restructuring and (6) changes in fair value of our revenue is as follows:various assets and liabilities that are remeasured on a recurring basis. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations from these results should be carefully evaluated. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide useful information about the Company’s core operating results and cash flow performance and thus are appropriate to enhance the overall understanding of the Company’s past financial performance and its prospects for the future. The non-GAAP financial measures are included in the table below.

Reconciliation from GAAP to Non-GAAP Results (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, Change
 2016 2015    
(dollars in thousands)$ % $ % $ %
Biopharma Services15,321
 57% 11,564
 64% 3,757
 32%
Clinical Services10,651
 39% 5,651
 31% 5,000
 88%
Discovery Services1,077
 4% 825
 5% 252
 31%
Total Revenue27,049
 100% 18,040
 100% 9,009
 50%
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Reconciliation of net loss from continuing operations:    
Net loss from continuing operations $(6,885) $(4,205)
Adjustments:    
Interest expense, net 1,329
 298
Depreciation 159
 310
Amortization 454
 491
Stock-based compensation 263
 530
Impairment of goodwill 2,873
 
Merger costs 117
 1,464
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable (4) (136)
Change in fair value of other derivatives (86) 86
Change in fair value of warrant liability (70) (3,732)
Change in fair value of siParadigm Earn-Out 935
 
Change in fair value of Excess Consideration Note (93) 
Gain on troubled debt restructuring (258) 
Income tax benefit (512) 
Adjusted EBITDA (loss) from continuing operations $(1,778) $(4,894)

Adjusted EBITDA loss from continuing operations decreased 64% to $1.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, from an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $4.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Revenue from Continuing Operations

Revenue from continuing operations increased 50%48%, or $9.0$2.4 million, to $27.0$7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, from $18.0$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, principally due to a full year of operations at CGI West, whose revenue accounted for $6.5 million ofan increase in the increase. The remaining increase was driven by additional clinical trial studies, as we execute on a growing number of signed contracts with pharmaceuticalclinical studies conducted in the Company's U.S. operations from sponsors based in the U.S. and biotechnology companies, andEurope, which resulted in a higher volume of active projects as the demand for its CRO services continued growth of our Discovery Services. Our average revenue (excluding probe revenue) per test decreased to $421 per test forincrease throughout the year ended December 31, 2016 from $532 per test for the year ended December 31, 2015, principally due to the increased volume from our CGI West facility at lower average revenue per test. Overall test volumes increased by 142% from 19,996 tests for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 48,427 tests for the year ended December 31, 2016.year.

RevenueCost of Revenues from Biopharma ServicesContinuing Operations

Cost of revenues from continuing operations increased 32%20%, or $3.8 million,$611 thousand, to $15.3$3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, from $11.6$3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, principally due to additional clinical trial studies performed at our New Jersey location which accounted for $2.9 millionincreased usage of lab supplies of $431 thousand, outsourced labor of $124 thousand and payroll costs and benefits of $110 thousand required to support the increase and a full year of operations at CGI West, which accounted for $1.6 million of the increase. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in Biopharma Services revenue of $0.7 million at our North Carolina location as we continuerevenue. Gross margin increased from 37% to leverage a multi-site strategy utilizing our diverse portfolio of diagnostic tests and medical and clinical staff expertise across our enterprise. Revenue from Clinical Services customers increased 88%, or $5.0 million, to $10.7 million for49% during the year ended December 31, 2016, from $5.7 million for2019. The increase in gross margin was caused by gaining operating leverage over the year ended December 31, 2015, principally due to a full year ofCompany's fixed costs associated with its laboratory operations at CGI West, which accounted for $4.9 million of the increase. Revenue from Discovery Servicesand personnel as its revenue increased $0.3 million, to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, representing 4% of total revenue.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues increased 21%, or $3.0 million, to $17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, principally due to the following: increased costs of $3.8 millionincrementally higher than its related to a full year of

operations at CGI West, and lab supplies expenses increased by $0.3 million or 7% as a result of higher test volumes. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in compensation of $1.1 million due to decreased headcounts and our focus on integrating prior acquisitions, executing on enterprise-wide purchasing programs and controlling direct labor costs.

Operating Expenses from Continuing Operations

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased 9%, or $0.5 million,from continuing operations decreased $154 thousand due to $6.0 million forwinding down the year ended December 31, 2016, from $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Research and development costs increased by $1.6 million, as we added scientific, medical and clinical expertise to our R&D initiatives from our staff at CGI West, and related supplies costs increased by $0.2 million, or 18%, as a result of an increase in R&D activities across the enterprise. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our share of the loss from Oncospire, our joint venture with the Mayo Clinic, of $0.6 million, or 90%,Foundation for Medical Education and a reduction in non-cash stock-based compensation of $0.2 million, or 61%. We also reduced collaboration costs by $0.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the proximity to reaching commercialization of a developed test with our joint venture partner Mayo Clinic.Research.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased 10%from continuing operations decreased 23%, or $1.5 million to $16.0$5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, from $14.6$6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018 primarily due to decreased legal costs of $1.2 million and decreased costs of other professional services of $557 thousand as a result of negotiating fee arrangements with certain vendors. The increaseCompany also had a $207 thousand reduction in director fees primarily relates toas a result of the costdirectors waiving past due compensation of operating CGI West$263 thousand in exchange for stock options valued at $54 thousand. Other causes for the decline include reduced stock-based compensation expense of $251 thousand and a full year, which increased general and administrative costs by $2.5 million. This increase was partially offset by a$237 thousand decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation of $0.6 million, or 30%,NASDAQ and a reduction in travel and entertainment costs of $0.3 million, or 66%.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 11%, or $0.6 million, to $4.7 million fortransfer agent fees during the year ended December 31, 2016, from $5.3 million for2019. These reductions were offset, in part, by an increase

in salaries and bonuses of $302 thousand, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $149 thousand and increases in software and other office supplies of $88 thousand and $87 thousand, respectively.

Impairment of Goodwill. During the year ended December 31, 2015, principally due to2019, the following: compensation costs decreased by $0.8Company recorded impairment of goodwill of $2.9 million or 21%, as a resultafter considering the effects of decreased headcounts, along with a $0.1 million decreasethe Business Disposals and declines in advertising and trade show expenses, a $0.1 million decrease in consulting fees and a $0.1 million decrease in travel and entertainment as a result of our efforts to cut costs. These decreases were offset partially by increased costs associated with operating CGI West for a full year of $0.6 millionits stock price.

Interest Income and Expense

Interest expense increased 46%, or $0.1 million, to $0.4 million forMerger Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2016, from $0.32019, the Company recognized $117 thousand of merger costs associated with the Business Disposals, as compared to $1.5 million forduring the year ended December 31, 2015, principally2018 related to its failed merger with NovellusDx, Ltd. (“NDX”).

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense from continuing operations increased by $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to two financing agreements that were only in place for a portion of the higheryear ended December 31, 2018. The Company incurred $571 thousand of interest rate relatedon the Convertible Note and the Advance from NDX (defined below) during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $175 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company also amortized $1.1 million of debt discounts on these two agreements during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $517 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company entered into a standstill agreement with Iliad during the first quarter of 2019, which resulted in $202 thousand of additional fees. Later the Company entered into a second standstill agreement that reduced the conversion price on a portion of the Convertible Note, resulting in $547 thousand of additional interest. In June 2019, the Company defaulted on the Convertible Note, creating a 15% increase in the outstanding balance at the date of default, which totaled $409 thousand. The Company allocated $1.5 million and $389 thousand of this interest to discontinuing operations during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The interest expense was refinanced in May 2015.partially offset by interest income received from the Excess Consideration Note of $107 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

Changes in fair value of some of ourthe Company's common stock warrants may impact ourits results.  Accounting rules require usthe Company to record certain of ourits warrants as a liability, measure the fair value of these warrants each quarter and record changes in that value in earnings. As a result of a decrease in our stock price, weThe Company recognized non-cash income of $1.5$70 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to non-cash income of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, as compared to non-cash incomea result of $35,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.fluctuations in its stock price. In the future, if ourthe its stock price increases, wethe Company would record a non-cash charge as a result of changes in the fair value of ourits common stock warrants. Consequently, wethe Company may be exposed to non-cash charges, or weit may record non-cash income, as a result of this warrant exposure in future periods.

Change in Fair Value of Acquisition Note PayablesiParadigm Earn-Out

The changesiParadigm Earn-Out relates to the disposal of the Company's Clinical Business in July 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a $935 thousand loss due to the decrease in fair value of the acquisition note payable resultedsiParadigm Earn-Out due to the loss of several significant Clinical Business customers in $0.2 millionthe latter part of 2019.

Change in non-cash income forFair Value of Excess Consideration Note

The Excess Consideration Note relates to the disposal of its Biopharma Business in July 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared2019, the Company recognized a $93 thousand gain due to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Theincrease in fair value of the note, representing partExcess Consideration Note due to changes in the expected settlement of the purchase price for BioServe, decreased as a consequence of a decrease in our stock price.AR Holdback and the Indemnification Holdback.

Other ExpenseGain on Troubled Debt Restructuring

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we incurred $325,0002019, the Company recognized a $258 thousand gain on troubled debt restructuring related to a settlement agreement reached with NDX (“NDX Settlement Agreement”) covering $1.5 million in funds advanced to the Company prior to the failed merger in 2018 (“Advance from NDX”). The NDX Settlement Agreement required the Company to repay $1.1 million of expense resultingprincipal and interest on the Advance from NDX. Upon receipt of these payments, the issuanceAdvance from NDX was reduced to $450 thousand. The remaining amount due is interest-free and payable in monthly installments of derivative warrants as part of the 2016 Offerings.$50 thousand, which began in November 2019.

Income TaxesTax Benefit

In November 2015, we received $1.2On April 4, 2019, the Company sold $11.6 million from salesof gross State of New Jersey NOLs relating to the 2017 tax year as well as $72 thousand of state NOL's and research and development tax credits. No NOL's or research and development tax credits were soldThe sale resulted in the net receipt by the Company of $512 thousand. The Company did not sell any NOLs during 2018. The Company's effective rate for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016.

2019 and 2018 was 7.1% and 0.0%, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Liquidity

OurThe primary sources of the Company's liquidity have been cash collections from customers, funds generated from our debt financings and equity financings. In addition, we have generated funds from the following sources: (i) cash collections from customersfinancings, and (ii) cash received from sale of state NOL’s.the Business Disposals. The Company expects to continue generating additional cash from its customers in the future and from its Business Disposals for a limited time until the Earn-Out is paid as discussed below.

During November 2015, we received $1.2January 2019, the Company closed two public offerings and issued an aggregate of 952 thousand shares of common stock for $5.4 million, from salesnet of expenses and discounts of $1.1 million. In October 2019, the Company issued the Note Payable to Atlas Sciences for $1.3 million, net of discounts, which was remitted directly to Iliad to satisfy a portion of the Convertible Note balance. The Company also sold $11.6 million of gross State of New Jersey NOL’s relating to the 2017 tax year as well as $72 thousand of state NOL’s and research and development tax credits.

In general, our primary usescredits in April 2019. The sale resulted in the net receipt by the Company of cash are providing for operating expenses, working capital purposes and servicing debt. On January 28, 2016, the Line of Credit was amended with SVB, and we are no longer able to draw on the Line of Credit until, as of December 31, 2016, we raise approximately $2.5 million of additional equity. On March 22, 2017, we restructured our debt with Silicon Valley Bank, by repaying the outstanding term loan and entering into a new two year $6.0 million asset-based revolving line of credit agreement. We concurrently entered into a new $6.0 million term loan agreement with Partners for Growth, which, on the day of closing, increased our indebtedness from $4.4 million to $6.0 million and increased our available cash by $1.6 million. We will be able to borrow up to $6.0 million on the revolver, based on a formula tied to eligible accounts receivable, which will increase our indebtedness dollar for dollar. In connection with such debt restructuring we issued warrants to such lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common stock.

Our largest source of operating cash flow is cash collections from our customers.

Offerings$512 thousand.

In July 2015, we sold 2,800 shares2019, the Company completed two business disposals, resulting in an aggregate of common stock$9.0 million of net cash proceeds at the time of closing; however, $1.0 million of the funds received is an advance from siParadigm that resultedis being deducted from the Earn-Out amounts due during the period. At December 31, 2019. the estimated future Earn-Out payments from siParadigm, net of the remaining balance of the advance, were $285 thousand, which are expected to be collected in net proceedsvariable monthly payments through July 2021; the monthly payment amount is based on the number of tests performed by siParadigm for the Company's former Clinical Services' customers. At December 31, 2019, the Company also holds a note receivable from IDXG (the Excess Consideration Note) for $888 thousand. The balance at December 31, 2019 represents the AR Holdback of $153 thousand and the Indemnification Holdback of $735 thousand, which were due to the Company of $34,000 through our sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.on January 15, 2020 and were received in full in April and May 2020, respectively.

On November 12, 2015, we sold 3,000,000 shares of common stock with warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a combined public offering price of $4.00 per share and warrant resulting in gross proceeds of $12.0 million ($10.3 million of net proceeds after offering expenses and underwriting discounts). The underwriters also received 450,000 warrants pursuant to the partial exerciseprimary uses of the over-allotment option.Company's liquidity have been cash used to fund the Company's operations, as detailed in the cash flows section below, as well as cash used to repay the Company's lenders. During 2019, the Company settled the Convertible Note owed to Iliad and significantly reduced the amount of its Advance from NDX. The warrants haveNote Payable to Atlas Sciences matures in October 2020; furthermore, Atlas Sciences is entitled to demand monthly redemptions of up to $300 thousand beginning in April 2020. The Company is also required to remit monthly installments of $50 thousand to NDX until the Advance from NDX is repaid. Subsequent to year-end, an exercise price of $5.00, became fully-exercisable at issuance and expireadditional $250 thousand was repaid on November 12, 2020.the Advance from NDX.

On May 25, 2016, we sold 2,467,820 shares of common stock in a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,233,910 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement. These offerings resulted in gross proceeds of $5 million. We sold 2,150,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,075,000 shares of common stock to certain institutional investorsAt December 31, 2019, the Company does not project that cash at a combined offering price of $2.00 per common share, and our Chairman of the Board, John Pappajohn, purchased 317,820 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 158,910 shares of common stock at a combined offering price of $2.2025 per common share. In addition, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 123,391 shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrantsDecember 31, 2019 will be initially exercisable commencing sixsufficient to fund normal operations for the twelve months from the issuance date at an exercise price equalof these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company's ability to $2.25 per share of common stock. The warrants are exercisablecontinue as a going concern is dependent on reduced losses and improved future cash flows. Alternatively, the Company may be required to raise additional equity or debt capital, or consummate other strategic transactions. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for five years from the initial exercise date.

On September 14, 2016, we sold 2,750,000 shares of common stock in a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,375,000 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement at a combined price of $2.00 per common share. These offerings resulted in gross proceeds of $5.5 million. In addition, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 137,500 shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership restrictions, the warrants will be initially exercisable sixnext twelve months from the issuance date at an exercise price of $2.25 per share of common stock.these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date.

Credit Facility

On May 7, 2015, we entered into a new debt financing facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) to refinance the Company’s cash collateralized loan from Wells Fargo and toCompany can provide an additional working capital line of credit. The SVB credit facility provides for a $6.0 million term note (“Term Note”) and a revolving line of credit (“Line of Credit”) for an amount not to exceed the lesser of (i) $4.0 million or (ii) an amount equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. The Term Note requires monthly principal payments of approximately $167,000 plus interest through maturity on April 1, 2019. The interest rate of the Term Note is the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 2%, with a floor of 5.25% (5.75% at December 31, 2016) and an additional deferred interest payment of $180,000no assurance that these actions will be due upon maturity. The Linesuccessful or that additional sources of Credit requires monthly interest-only payments

of the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.5% (5.25%financing will be available on favorable terms, if at December 31, 2016) and matures on May 7, 2017. The new loan agreement requires maintenance of certain financial ratios and grants SVB a first security interest in substantially all Company assets (other than our intellectual property). Pursuant to the new loan agreement, we are no longer required to maintain restricted cash accounts. At December 31, 2016, the principal balance of the Term Note was $4.7 million and the principal balance of the Line of Credit was $0. Pursuant to the amendment dated January 28, 2016, we are restricted from using the Line of Credit until, as of December 31, 2016, $2.5 million of additional equity is raised.

On March 22, 2017, we restructured our debt with Silicon Valley Bank, by repaying the outstanding term loan and entering into a new two year asset-based revolving line of credit agreement. The new SVB credit facility provides for an asset-based line of credit (“ABL”) for an amount not to exceed the lesser of $6.0 million or 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of 50% of the net collectable value of 3rd party accounts receivable or three (3) times the average monthly collection amount of 3rd party accounts receivable over the previous quarter. The ABL requires monthly interest payments of the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.5% (5.5% at March 22, 2017) and matures on March 22, 2019.

We concurrently entered into a new $6.0 million term loan agreement with Partners for Growth (“PFG”). The term note is an interest only loan with the full principal and any outstanding interest due at maturity on March 22, 2020. The interest rate of the term note is 11.5% per annum, and may reduce to 11.0% in 2018 based on achieving certain financial milestones set forth by PFG. In connection with such debt restructuring we issued 7 year warrants to such lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.82 per share.all.

Cash Flows from Continuing Operations

OurThe Company's net cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities from continuing operations for the periods below were as follows:follows (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2019 2018
(in thousands)    
Cash provided by (used in):    
    
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations:    
Operating activities $(17,851) $(13,599) $(3,239) $(3,201)
Investing activities (609) (2,640) (28) (17)
Financing activities 8,503
 10,144
 3,420
 3,957
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(9,957) $(6,095)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (17) (59)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations $136
 $680

WeThe Company had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $9.5$4.2 million and $511 thousand at December 31, 20162019 and $19.5 million at December 31, 2015.2018, respectively.

The $10.0 million decrease$136 thousand increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations was principally the result of $5.4 million received in the 2019 Offerings, net of expenses. These receipts were offset, in part, by $3.2 million of net cash used to fund operations, $1.0 million used to settle the remainder of the Convertible Note with Iliad, and $892 thousand of payments on the Advance from NDX.

The $680 thousand increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 was2018, principally resulted from proceeds of $2.5 million and $1.5 million from the result of using $17.9 million ofConvertible Note and Advance from NDX, respectively, offset, in part, by net cash used in operations investing $0.5 million in fixed assets and repaying $1.3 million of debt, offset by $10.0 million in net proceeds from the 2016 Offerings.

The $6.1 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2015 was principally the result of the use of $13.6 million of net cash in operations, purchasing substantially all of assets of Response Genetics for $7.5 million (plus stock), and investing $1.0 million in fixed assets, offset by the $6.0 million decrease in restricted cash and the $10.3 million in net proceeds from the 2015 Offering.$3.2 million.

Cash Used in Operating Activities from Continuing Operations

NetDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $17.9$3.2 million, forconsisting of net loss from continuing operations of $6.9 million, positive non-cash adjustments of $5.4 million and additional uses of cash relating to changes in working capital items of $1.7 million. Changes in cash flows from working capital items were primarily driven by a net increase in other current assets of $279 thousand, a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue of $1.3 million, and a decrease in obligations under operating leases of $189 thousand. These uses of cash were partially offset by a net decrease in accounts receivable of $81 thousand.

During the year ended December 31, 2016. We2018, cash used $12.2in operating activities from continuing operations was $3.2 million, inconsisting of net loss from continuing operations of $4.2 million, negative non-cash adjustments of $2.0 million and additional cash provided relating to run our core operations, including losses from operations and $0.3 millionchanges in cash paid for interest. We incurred additional uses of cash when adjusting for working capital items as follows: a net increaseof $3.0 million. Cash flows from changes in accounts receivable of $5.9 million and a combined increase in other current and non-current assets of $0.1 million. All of these uses of cashworking capital items were partially offsetprimarily driven by a net increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue of $0.4 million.$2.9 million and a net reduction in accounts receivable of $296 thousand. These cash flows were offset by an increase in other current assets of $87 thousand and other non-current assets of $49 thousand.

Cash Provided by Investing Activities from Continuing Operations

Net cash used in operatingcontinuing investing activities was $13.6$28 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019, relating to purchases of fixed assets.

Net cash used in continuing investing activities was $17 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018, relating to purchases of fixed assets.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities from Continuing Operations

Net cash provided by continuing financing activities was $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. We used $15.72019 and principally resulted from net proceeds received from the 2019 Offerings of $5.4 million, offset, in net cash to run our core operations, which included $0.2 million in cash paid for interest. We incurred additional usespart, by principal payments of cash when adjusting for working capital items as follows: a net increase in accounts receivable of $1.7 million; an increase in other current assets of $0.4$1.0 million and an increase in other assets of $0.1 million. All of these uses of cash were partially offset by a net

increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue of $3.1 million$892 thousand on the Convertible Note and the receiptAdvance from NDX, respectively, as well as $72 thousand of $1.2 million from the sale of state NOL carryforwards and research and development credits in November 2015.

Cash Used in Investing Activitiespayments on finance leases.

Net cash used in investingprovided by continuing financing activities was $0.6$4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20162018 and principally resulted from the purchaseproceeds of fixed assets for $0.5$2.5 million and patent costs of $0.1 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $2.6$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and principally resulted from the purchase of substantially all assets of Response Genetics for $7.5 million, plus stock,Convertible Note and the purchase of fixed assets for $1.0 million, offset by the $6.0 million decrease in restricted cash resultingAdvance from refinancing our debt in May 2015.

Cash Used/Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 principally due to the 2016 Offerings, which resulted in $10.0 million in net proceeds, offset by the repayment of $1.3 million in indebtedness and capital lease payments of $0.1 million.

Net cash used in financing activities was $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 principally due to the 2015 Offering, which resulted in $10.3 million in net proceeds, offset by capital lease payments of $0.1 million and equity issuance costs of $0.1 million.NDX, respectively.

Capital Resources Acquisitions and Expenditure Requirements

We expectThe Company expects to continue to incur material operating losses in the future. Itfuture, as the costs of being public have significant effect on losses that keep the Company from being profitable. The Company expects losses to continue, only to the extent that the business does not outpace the public company-related expenses, such as legal and audit fees and director’s and officer’s liability insurance. These losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on the Company's working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with its revenue growth and costs associated with being a public company, the Company is unable to predict when it will become profitable, and it may take several years,never become profitable. Even if ever,the Company does achieve profitability, it may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. The Company's inability to achieve positive operationaland then maintain profitability would negatively affect its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Weflows. As a result, it may need to raise additional capital to fund ourits current operations, to repay certain outstanding indebtedness and to fund expansion of ourits business to meet ourits long-term business objectives through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, borrowings or strategic partnerships coupled with an investment in our companythe Company or a combination thereof. If we raisethe Company raises additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt securities, or other debt securities, these securities could be secured and could have rights senior to those of ourits common stock. In addition, any new debt incurred by the Company could impose covenants that restrict ourits operations and increase ourits interest expense. The issuance of any new equity securities will also dilute the interest of our current stockholders. Given the risks associated with our business, including our unprofitable operating history and our ability to develop additional proprietary tests, additional capital may not be available when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we will need to curb our expansion plans or limit our research and development activities, which would have a material adverse impact on our business prospects and results of operations.

We believeIn October 2019, the Company settled the Convertible Note owed to Iliad and now owes $1.3 million in principal amount to Atlas Sciences under a new unsecured note due in October 2020. The Company also owes an aggregate of $350 thousand to NDX as of December 31, 2019 pursuant to the NDX Settlement Agreement, which is payable in monthly installments of $50 thousand. The Company has no material capital commitments outside of its existing debt arrangements.

Even after the Business Disposals, the Company does not project that our current cash at December 31, 2019 will supportbe sufficient to fund normal operations for at least the next 12twelve months from the dateissuance of this report. Wethese financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on reduced losses and improved future cash flows. Alternatively, the Company may be required to explore opportunities forraise additional equity or debt financing, and we are taking stepscapital, or consummate other strategic transactions. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to improve our operating cash flow. Wecontinue as a going concern for the next twelve months from the issuance of these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company can provide no assurancesassurance that our currentthese actions will be successful or that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all, when needed. Ourall. The Company made this assessment in light of the expected impact of COVID 19.

The Company's forecast of the period of time through which ourits current financial resources will be adequate to support ourits operations and the costs to support our general and administrative, sales and marketing and research and development activities are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties.

Management believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, taken together with the net proceeds of the  debt financing completed in March 2017, will be sufficient to fund the Company's operations for at least the next twelve months after filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We expect our operating expenses to increase as we continue investing in sales and marketing, research and development and other general and administrative expenses.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our current financial resources will be adequate to support our operations and our expected operating expenses are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could vary materially and negatively as a result of a number of factors, including:
 
ourthe Company's ability to adapt its business for future developments in light of the global outbreak of the novel coronavirus, which continues to rapidly evolve;
the Company's ability to achieve revenue growthprofitability by increasing sales of the Company's preclinical CRO services focused on oncology and profitability;immuno-oncology;
the costs for funding the operations we recently acquired;
ourCompany's ability to improve efficiency of billingraise additional capital to repay its indebtedness and collection processes;meet its liquidity needs;
our ability to obtain approvals for our new diagnostic tests;

ourthe Company's ability to execute on ourits marketing and sales strategy for our testsits preclinical research services and gain acceptance of our testsits services in the market;
ourthe Company's ability to keep pace with rapidly advancing market and scientific developments;
the Company's ability to satisfy U.S. (including FDA) and international regulatory requirements with respect to its services;
the Company's ability to maintain its present customer base and obtain new customers;
competition from preclinical CRO services companies, many of which are much larger than the Company in terms of employee base, revenues and overall number of customers and related market share;
the Company's ability to maintain the Company's clinical and research collaborations and enter into new collaboration agreements with highly regarded organizations in the field of oncology so that, among other things, the Company has access to thought leaders in advanced preclinical and translational science;
potential product liability or intellectual property infringement claims;
the Company's dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply it with instruments and specialized supplies;
the Company's ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of scientists, clinicians, sales personnel and other key personnel with extensive experience in oncology and immuno-oncology, who are in short supply;
the Company's ability to obtain adequate reimbursement from governmental andor maintain patents or other third-party payorsappropriate protection for ourthe intellectual property in its proprietary tests and services;
the costs, scope, progress, results, timing and outcomes of the clinical trials of our tests;
the costs of operating and enhancing our laboratory facilities;
ourCompany's ability to succeed with our cost control initiative;effectively manage its international businesses in Australia, Europe and China, including the expansion of its customer base and volume of new contracts in these markets;
the timing ofCompany's dependency on the intellectual property licensed to the Company or possessed by third parties; and the costs involved in regulatory compliance, particularly if the regulations change;
the costs of maintaining, expanding and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, including potential litigation costs and liabilities;
ourCompany's ability to manage the costs of manufacturing our tests;
our rate of progress in, and cost of research and development activities associated with, products in research and early development;
the effect of competing technological and market developments;
costs related to expansion;
our ability to secure financing and the amount thereof;adequately support future growth; and
other risks discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

We expectThe consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 were prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates that our operating expensesthe Company will be able to realize assets and capital expenditures will increasedischarge liabilities in the future as we expand ournormal course of business. We planAccordingly, they do not give effect to increase our sales and marketing headcountadjustments that would be necessary should the Company be required to promote our new clinical tests and services andliquidate its assets.  The ability of the Company to expand into new geographiesmeet its obligations, and to continue our research and development expenditures associated with performing work with research collaborators, to expand our pipeline and to perform work associated with our research collaborations. For example, in 2011 we entered into an affiliation agreement to formas a joint venture with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research pursuant to which we made an initial $1.0 million capital contribution in October 2013 and $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2014. We may make additional capital contributions of up to $4.0 million, subject to the joint venture entity’s achievement of certain operational milestones. Until we can generate a sufficient amount of revenues to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations.


Subject togoing concern is dependent upon the availability of future financing, we may use significant cash to fund acquisitions. On October 9, 2015, we acquired substantially allfunding and the continued growth in revenues.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the assets of Response Genetics for aggregate consideration of approximately $12.9 million consisting of $7.5 million in cash and our common stock valued at approximately $5.4 million.these uncertainties.

Future Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects a summary of ourthe Company's estimates of future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016.2019. The information in the table reflects future unconditional payments and is based on the terms of the relevant agreements, appropriate classification of items under U.S. GAAP as currently in effect and certain assumptions, such as the interest rate on ourthe Company's variable debt that was in effect as of December 31, 2016.2019. Future events could cause actual payments to differ from these amounts.
 Payments Due by Period Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 years Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 years
(dollars in thousands)                    
Principal and interest under notes payable and lines of credit $4,991
 $2,216
 $2,775
 $
 $
Capital Lease obligations, including interest, for equipment 549
 136
 243
 170
 
Operating lease obligations relating to corporate headquarters and clinical laboratories 2,783
 1,712
 896
 175
 
Principal and interest on unsecured debt $1,789
 $1,789
 $
 $
 $
Finance lease obligations, including interest, for equipment 209
 84
 80
 45
 
Operating lease obligations relating to administrative offices and laboratories 220
 209
 11
 
 
Total $8,323
 $4,064
 $3,914
 $345
 $
 $2,218
 $2,082
 $91
 $45
 $

Income Taxes

Over the past several years we havethe Company has generated operating losses in all jurisdictions in which weit may be subject to income taxes. As a result, we havethe Company has accumulated significant net operating losses and other deferred tax assets. Because of ourthe Company's history of losses and the uncertainty as to the realization of those deferred tax assets, a full valuation allowance has been recognized. We doThe Company does not

expect to report a benefit related to the deferred tax assets until we haveit has a history of earnings, if ever, that would support the realization of ourits deferred tax assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since inception, we havethe Company has not engaged in any off balanceoff-balance sheet activities as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgment and Estimates

OurThe Company's management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on ourits consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires usmanagement to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate ourthe Company evaluates its estimates based on historical experience and makemakes various assumptions, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, which form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we have chosen to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

The notes to ourthe Company's audited consolidated financial statements contain a summary of ourits significant accounting policies. We considerManagement considers the following accounting policies critical to the understanding of the results of ourthe Company's operations:
 
Revenue recognition;
Accounts receivable and bad debts;
Stock-based compensation; and
Warrant liability.liabilities and other derivatives;
Stock-based compensation;
Income taxes; and
Impairment of intangibles and long-lived assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The notes to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements contain a summary of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A.Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We haveThe Company has exposure to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates, and risk associated with how we invest ourit invests its cash.

Foreign Exchange Risk

We conductThe Company conducts business in foreign markets through ourits subsidiary in India (BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited) and in Italy through our subsidiary (Cancer Genetics Italia, S.r.l.Australia (vivoPharm Pty Ltd.). For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, approximately 4%20% and 5%33%, respectively, of ourthe Company's continuing revenues were earned outside the United States and collected in local currency. We areThe Company is subject to risk for exchange rate fluctuations between such local currencies and the United States dollar and the subsequent translation of the Indian RupeeAustralia Dollar or Euro to United States dollars. WeThe Company currently dodoes not hedge currency risk. The translation adjustments for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were not significant.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2016, we had interest rate risk primarily related to borrowings of $4.7 million on the term note with Silicon Valley Bank (“Silicon Valley Line”). Borrowings under the Silicon Valley term note bear interest at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 2%, with a floor of 5.25% (5.75% at December 31, 2016). If interest rates increased by 1.0%, interest expense in 2017 on our current borrowings would increase by approximately $37,000.

Investment of Cash


We invest ourThe Company invests its cash primarily in money market funds. Because of the short-term nature of these investments, we dothe Company does not believe we haveit has material exposure due to market risk. The impact to ourthe Company's financial position and results of operations from likely changes in interest rates is not material.


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Report December 31, 20162019
 
   
  
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss
  
  
  
  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholdersof
Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Cancer Genetics, Inc. and subsidiaries(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss,changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph - Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 2, the Company has minimal working capital, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Retrospective Adjustments
We also have audited the adjustments to the financial statements as of December 31, 2018 and for the year then ended. ended to retrospectively apply the change in accounting for the reverse stock split and discontinued operations, as described in Note 1. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2018 financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2018 financial statements taken as a whole.

Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of the guidance in ASC Topic 842, Leases (“Topic 842”), as amended, effective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audit included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

Our audit also includesincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

Houston, Texas
May 29, 2020





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cancer Genetics, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, except for effects of the adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we been engaged to audit the Company’s restatement for discontinued operations and a reverse stock-split, as described below, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Restatement for 2019 transactions requiring retrospective accounting treatment in 2018 financial statements
We were not engaged to audit the restatement of the 2018 financial statements and disclosures for discontinued operations and a reverse stock-split, as discussed in Note 1 to the 2019 financial statements.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying 2018 financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the 2018 financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses, and has an accumulated deficit and negative cash flows from operations. The Company is also in violation of certain debt covenants. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2 to the 2018 financial statements. The 2018 financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3 to the 2018 financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for recognizing revenue effective January 1, 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Except as discussed above, we conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cancer Genetics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ RSM US LLP
We served as the Company's auditor from 2010 to 2019.

New York, New York
March 23, 2017April 15, 2019



CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value)
 December 31, December 31,
 2016 2015 2019 2018
ASSETS        
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash and cash equivalents $9,502
 $19,459
 $3,880
 $161
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of 2016 $1,387; 2015 $664 11,748
 6,621
Restricted cash 350
 
Accounts receivable 696
 777
Earn-Out from siParadigm, current portion 747
 
Excess Consideration Note 888
 
Other current assets 2,174
 2,118
 546
 267
Current assets of discontinuing operations 71
 23,250
Total current assets 23,424
 28,198
 7,178
 24,455
FIXED ASSETS, net of accumulated depreciation 4,738
 6,069
 558
 558
OTHER ASSETS        
Operating lease right-of-use assets 94
 
Restricted cash 300
 300
 
 350
Earn-Out from siParadigm, less current portion 356
 
Patents and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization 1,503
 1,727
 2,895
 3,349
Investment in joint venture 268
 341
 92
 92
Goodwill 12,029
 12,029
 3,090
 5,963
Other 172
 220
 641
 639
Total other assets 14,272
 14,617
 7,168
 10,393
Total Assets $42,434
 $48,884
 $14,904
 $35,406
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $8,148
 $7,579
 $2,072
 $4,598
Obligations under capital leases, current portion 109
 122
Obligations under operating leases, current portion 193
 
Obligations under finance leases, current portion 68
 45
Deferred revenue 789
 831
 1,217
 1,214
Bank term note, current portion 2,000
 1,333
Convertible note, net 
 2,481
Note payable, net 1,277
 
Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd., net 350
 535
Advance from siParadigm, current portion 566
 
Other derivatives 
 86
Current liabilities of discontinuing operations 1,229
 19,189
Total current liabilities 11,046
 9,865
 6,972
 28,148
Bank term note 2,654
 4,642
Obligations under capital leases 374
 276
Obligations under operating leases, less current portion 10
 
Obligations under finance leases, less current portion 107
 54
Advance from siParadigm, less current portion 252
 
Deferred rent payable and other 290
 315
 
 154
Warrant liability 2,018
 17
 178
 248
Deferred revenue, long-term 428
 752
Total Liabilities 16,810
 15,867
 7,519
 28,604
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, authorized 9,764 shares $0.0001 par value, none issued 
 
 
 
Common stock, authorized 100,000 shares, $0.0001 par value, 18,936 and 13,652 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively 2
 1
Additional paid-in capital 139,576
 131,167
Accumulated deficit (113,954) (98,151)
Total Stockholders’ Equity 25,624
 33,017
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $42,434
 $48,884
Common stock, authorized 100,000 shares, $0.0001 par value, 2,104 and 924 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively 
 

Additional paid-in capital 171,783
 164,458
Accumulated other comprehensive income 26
 60
Accumulated deficit (164,424) (157,716)
Total Stockholders’ Equity 7,385
 6,802
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $14,904
 $35,406

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Revenue $27,049
 $18,040
 $7,305
 $4,932
Cost of revenues 17,104
 14,098
 3,701
 3,090
Gross profit 9,945
 3,942
 3,604
 1,842
Operating expenses:        
Research and development 5,967
 5,483
 
 154
General and administrative 16,034
 14,567
 5,171
 6,716
Sales and marketing 4,668
 5,269
 1,146
 1,197
Impairment of goodwill 2,873
 
Merger costs 117
 1,464
Total operating expenses 26,669
 25,319
 9,307
 9,531
Loss from operations (16,724) (21,377)
Loss from continuing operations (5,703) (7,689)
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense (454) (344) (1,437) (319)
Interest income 23
 49
 108
 21
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable 4
 136
Change in fair value of other derivatives 86
 (86)
Change in fair value of warrant liability 1,525
 35
 70
 3,732
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable 152
 269
Other expense (325) 
Change in fair value of siParadigm Earn-Out (935) 
Change in fair value of Excess Consideration Note 93
 
Gain on troubled debt restructuring 258
 
Other income 59
 
Total other income (expense) 921
 9
 (1,694) 3,484
Loss before income taxes (15,803) (21,368) (7,397) (4,205)
Income tax (benefit) 
 (1,184)
Net (loss) $(15,803) $(20,184)
Basic net (loss) per share $(1.00) $(1.96)
Diluted net (loss) per share $(1.00) $(1.96)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 15,861
 10,298
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 15,861
 10,299
Income tax benefit 512
 
Loss from continuing operations (6,885) (4,205)
Income (loss) from discontinuing operations (including gain on disposal of businesses of $8,370 during the year ended December 31, 2019 and loss on disposal of business of $78 during the year ended December 31, 2018) 177
 (16,168)
Net loss (6,708) (20,373)
Foreign currency translation loss (34) (9)
Comprehensive loss $(6,742) $(20,382)
    
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations $(3.57) $(4.62)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinuing operations 0.09
 (17.77)
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(3.48) $(22.39)
    
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding 1,928
 910
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018
(in thousands)
  Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated
Deficit
 Total
  Shares Amount 
Balance, December 31, 2014 9,821
 1
 112,520
 (77,967) 34,554
Stock based compensation - employees 35
 
 2,558
 
 2,558
Stock based compensation - non-employees 
 
 276
 
 276
Exercise of warrants 
 
 1
 
 1
Exercise of options 4
 
 23
 
 23
Issuance of stock - Cantor Sales Agreement 3
 
 34
 
 34
Issuance of stock - acquisition of Response Genetics 789
 
 5,436
 
 5,436
Issuance of stock with warrants in 2015 Offering 3,000
 
 10,319
 
 10,319
Net loss 
 
 
 (20,184) (20,184)
Balance, December 31, 2015 13,652
 1
 131,167
 (98,151) 33,017
Stock based compensation—employees 16
 
 1,978
 
 1,978
Stock based compensation—non-employees 
 
 38
 
 38
Issuance of stock - consultant 50
 
 75
 
 75
Issuance of stock in 2016 Offerings 5,218
 1
 6,318
 
 6,319
Net loss 
 
 
 (15,803) (15,803)
Balance, December 31, 2016 18,936
 $2
 $139,576
 $(113,954) $25,624
  Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Accumulated
Deficit
 Total
  Shares Amount 
Balance, December 31, 2017 925
 $
 $161,530
 $69
 $(134,834) $26,765
Stock based compensation - employees (1) 
 921
 
 
 921
Fair value of warrants reclassified from liabilities to equity 
 
 423
 
 
 423
Modification of 2017 Debt warrants 
 
 83
 
 
 83
Beneficial conversion feature on Convertible Note 
 
 328
 
 
 328
Beneficial conversion feature on Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd. 
 
 1,173
 
 
 1,173
Transition adjustment for adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 
 
 
 
 (2,509) (2,509)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation 
 
 
 (9) 
 (9)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 (20,373) (20,373)
Balance, December 31, 2018 924
 
 164,458
 60
 (157,716) 6,802
Stock based compensation—employees 
 
 370
 
 
 370
Issuance of common stock with warrants for cash - 2019 Offerings, net of expenses and discounts 952
 
 5,412
 
 
 5,412
Issuance of common stock - Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. conversions and exchanges 225
 
 962
 
 
 962
Increase in fair value of embedded conversion option 
 
 547
 
 
 547
Fractional shares settlement (2) 
 (5) 
 
 (5)
Issuance of common stock to vendor 5
 
 39
 
 
 39
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation 
 
 
 (34) 
 (34)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 (6,708) (6,708)
Balance, December 31, 2019 2,104
 $
 $171,783
 $26
 $(164,424) $7,385

See Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
  Years Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net loss $(6,708) $(20,373)
Loss (income) from discontinuing operations (177) 16,168
Net loss from continuing operations (6,885) (4,205)
     
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:    
Depreciation 159
 310
Amortization 454
 491
Stock-based compensation 263
 530
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets 144
 
Change in fair value of warrant liability, acquisition note payable and other derivatives (160) (3,782)
Amortization of discount of debt and debt issuance costs 497
 226
Issuance of common stock to vendor 39
 
Interest added to Convertible Note 268
 
Modification of 2017 Debt warrants 
 83
Loss in equity-method investment 
 154
Change in fair value of siParadigm Earn-Out 935
 
Change in fair value of Excess Consideration note (93) 
Gain on troubled debt restructuring (258) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 256
 
Goodwill impairment 2,873
 
Change in working capital components:    
Accounts receivable 81
 296
Other current assets (279) (87)
Other non-current assets (2) (49)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue (1,342) 2,880
Obligations under operating leases (189) 
Deferred rent payable and other 
 (48)
Net cash used in operating activities, continuing operations (3,239) (3,201)
Net cash used in operating activities, discontinuing operations (5,421) (9,351)
Net cash used in operating activities (8,660) (12,552)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Purchase of fixed assets (28) (17)
Net cash used in investing activities, continuing operations (28) (17)
Net cash provided by investing activities, discontinuing operations 9,119
 1,101
Net cash provided by investing activities 9,091
 1,084
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Principal payments on obligations under finance leases (72) (43)
Proceeds from offerings of common stock, net of certain offering costs 5,412
 
Proceeds from Convertible Note 
 2,500
Principal payments on Convertible Note (1,023) 
Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd. 
 1,500
Principal payments on Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd. (892) 
Fractional shares settlement paid in cash (5) 
Net cash provided by financing activities, continuing operations 3,420
 3,957
Net cash used in financing activities, discontinuing operations (115) (1,810)
Net cash provided by financing activities 3,305
 2,147
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (17) (59)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
 3,719
 (9,380)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH    
Beginning 511
 9,891
Ending $4,230
 $511
  Years Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net loss $(15,803) $(20,184)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:    
Depreciation 2,032
 1,503
Amortization 343
 159
Provision for bad debts 723
 413
Stock-based compensation 2,016
 2,834
Stock issued for consulting services 75
 
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable (152) 269
Change in fair value of Gentris contingent consideration 
 (207)
Change in fair value of warrant liability (1,525) (35)
Amortization of loan guarantee, financing fees and debt issuance costs 12
 8
Loss in equity-method investment 73
 707
Change in working capital components:    
Accounts receivable (5,850) (1,662)
Other current assets (56) (384)
Other non-current assets (69) (101)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue 355
 3,114
Deferred rent and other (25) (33)
Net cash (used in) operating activities (17,851) (13,599)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Purchase of fixed assets (490) (1,008)
Decrease in restricted cash 
 6,000
Patent costs (119) (137)
Cash used in acquisition of Response Genetics 
 (7,495)
Net cash (used in) investing activities (609) (2,640)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Principal payments on capital lease obligations (126) (83)
Payment of equity issuance costs 
 (117)
Proceeds from public offerings of equity, net of offering costs 9,962
 10,353
Proceeds from warrant exercises 
 1
Proceeds from option exercises 
 23
Payment of debt issuance costs 
 (33)
Principal payments on notes payable (1,333) 
Net cash provided by financing activities 8,503
 10,144
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 (9,957) (6,095)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS    
Beginning 19,459
 25,554
Ending $9,502
 $19,459
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE    
Cash paid for interest $333
 $240
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH    
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Fixed assets acquired through capital lease arrangements $211
 $
Value of shares issued as partial consideration to purchase Response Genetics 
 5,436
Net tangible assets acquired via acquisition 
 2,843
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED    
CASH TO THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS:    
Cash and cash equivalents $3,880
 $161
Restricted cash 350
 350
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH $4,230
 $511
     
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE    
Cash paid for interest $1,501
 $1,271
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH    
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Fixed assets acquired through finance lease arrangements $145
 $75
Conversion of debt and accrued interest into common stock 350
 
Increase in fair value of conversion option 547
 
Exchanges of principal on Convertible Note for common stock 612
 
Partial pay-off of Convertible Note through note payable to Atlas Sciences, LLC 1,250
 
Fair value of warrants reclassified from liabilities to equity 
 423
Beneficial conversion feature on Convertible Note 
 328
Beneficial conversion feature on Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd. 
 1,173
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization, Description of Business, Reverse Stock Split, Business Disposals and Offerings

We areCancer Genetics, Inc. (the "Company") supports the efforts of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries to develop innovative new drug therapies. Until the closing of the Business Disposals (as defined below) in July 2019, the Company was an emerging leader in the field ofenabling precision medicine enablingin oncology by providing multi-disciplinary diagnostic and data solutions, facilitating individualized therapies in the field of oncology through ourits diagnostic products andtests, services and molecular markers. We develop, commercializeFollowing the Business Disposals described below, the Company currently has an extensive set of anti-tumor referenced data based on predictive xenograft and syngeneic tumor models from the acquisition of vivoPharm, Pty Ltd. (“vivoPharm”) in 2017, to provide molecular-Discovery Services such as contract research services, focused primarily on unique specialized studies to guide drug discovery and biomarker-based tests and services that enable physicians to personalize the clinical management of each individual patient by providing genomic information to better diagnose, monitor and inform cancer treatment and that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged in oncology trials to better select candidate populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing information regarding genomic factors influencing subject responses to therapeutics. We have a comprehensive, disease-focused oncology testing portfolio. Our tests and techniques target a wide range of cancers, covering nine of the top ten cancers in prevalencedevelopment programs in the United States, with additional unique capabilities offered by our FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test for identifying difficult to diagnose tumor types or poorly differentiated metastatic disease.oncology and immuno-oncology fields.

We wereThe Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 8, 1999 and, haveuntil the Business Disposals, had offices and state-of-the-art laboratories located in California, New Jersey and North Carolina Shanghai (China), and Hyderabad (India). Ourtoday continues to have laboratories comply with the highest regulatory standards as appropriate for thein Pennsylvania and Australia. The Company’s corporate headquarters are in Rutherford, New Jersey. The Company offers preclinical services they deliver including CLIA, CAP, NY State, California State and NABL (India). Our services are built on a foundation of world-class scientific knowledge and intellectual property in solid and blood-borne cancers, as well as strong academic relationships with major cancer centers such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Mayo Clinic,predictive tumor models, human orthotopic xenografts and syngeneic immuno-oncology relevant tumor models in its Hershey PA facility, and is a leader in the National Cancer Institute.field of immuno-oncology preclinical services in the United States. This service is supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in its Australian-based facilities in Clayton, VIC. Beginning in February 2020, the Company also has a laboratory in Gilles Plains, SA.
2015 Offering
Reverse Stock Split

On October 24, 2019, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation and effected a 30-for-1 reverse stock split of its common stock. All shares and per share information referenced throughout the consolidated financial statements and footnotes have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

Business Disposals - Discontinuing Operations

Sale of India Subsidiary

On April 26, 2018, the Company sold its India subsidiary, BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited (“BioServe”) to Reprocell, Inc., for $1.9 million, including $1.6 million in cash at closing and up to an additional $300 thousand, which was contingent upon the India subsidiary meeting a specified revenue target through August 31, 2018. The contingent consideration was reduced to $213 thousand and received in November 12, 2015, we2018.

The BioServe disposal resulted in the following (in thousands):


Consideration received: 
Cash received at closing$1,600
Contingent consideration received213
 $1,813
  
Net assets sold: 
Accounts receivable, net$365
Other current assets229
Fixed assets, net608
Goodwill735
Other noncurrent assets98
Cash transferred at closing49
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue(180)
Deferred rent and other(13)
 $1,891
  
Loss on disposal of BioServe$(78)

Interpace Biosciences, Inc.

On July 15, 2019, the Company entered into a secured creditor asset purchase agreement (the “BioPharma Agreement”) by and among the Company, Gentris, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”), Interpace Biosciences, Inc. (“IDXG”) and a newly-formed subsidiary of IDXG, Interpace BioPharma, Inc. (“Buyer”). The BioPharma Agreement provided for a consensual private foreclosure sale by PFG of all assets relating to the Company’s BioPharma Business (as defined in the BioPharma Agreement) to Buyer (the “BioPharma Disposal”).

Pursuant to the BioPharma Agreement, Buyer purchased from PFG certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Company relating to the BioPharma Business, providing as gross consideration $23.5 million, less certain closing adjustments totaling $2.0 million, of which $7.7 million was settled in the form of a promissory note issued by Buyer to the Company (the “Excess Consideration Note”) and the remainder was paid to PFG in cash. PFG utilized the cash proceeds to satisfy the outstanding balances of the Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) asset-based revolving line of credit (“ABL”) and the $6.0 million term note to PFG (“PFG Term Note”), and to satisfy certain transaction expenses. The balance of $2.3 million was delivered to the Company in addition to the Excess Consideration Note.

The following is a reconciliation of the original gross sales price to the consideration received (in thousands):

Original sales price: 
Gross sales price$23,500
Adjustments to sales price: 
Transaction costs(1,525)
Working capital adjustments(2,705)
Payment of other expenses(171)
Total adjustments to sales price(4,401)
Consideration received$19,099

The BioPharma Disposal resulted in the following (in thousands):


Consideration received: 
Cash received at closing$2,258
Fair value of Excess Consideration Note6,795
Repayment of ABL and accrued interest2,906
Repayment of Term Note and accrued interest6,250
Repayment of certain accounts payable and accrued expenses890
Net sales price$19,099
  
Net assets sold: 
Accounts receivable$4,271
Other current assets1,142
Fixed assets2,998
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,969
Patents and other intangible assets42
Goodwill10,106
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(4,970)
Obligations under operating leases(2,110)
Obligations under finance leases(451)
Deferred revenue(1,046)
 $11,951
  
Gain on disposal of BioPharma Business$7,148

The Excess Consideration Note, which required interest-only quarterly payments at a rate of 6% per year, was settled on October 24, 2019 for $6.0 million, including interest of $24 thousand. The Buyer withheld from the settlement of the Excess Consideration Note $775 thousand for a net worth adjustment (assets less liabilities) of the BioPharma business (“Net Worth”), $153 thousand to secure collection of certain older accounts receivable of the Company purchased by Buyer (“AR Holdback”) and an additional $735 thousand as security for indemnification obligations of the Company for any breaches of certain limited warranties and covenants of the Company and other specified items (“Indemnification Holdback”). The Company received the full amounts of the AR Holdback and the Indemnification Holdback in April and May 2020, respectively. The fair value of the Excess Consideration Note was $888 thousand at December 31, 2019.

The Company and Buyer also entered into a transition services agreement (the “TSA”) pursuant to which the Company and Buyer are providing certain services to each other to accommodate the transition of the BioPharma Business to Buyer. In particular, the Company agreed to provide to Buyer, among other things, certain personnel services, payroll processing, administration services and benefit administration services (collectively, the “Payroll and Benefits Services”), for a reasonable period commencing July 15, 2019, subject to the terms and conditions of the TSA, in exchange for payment or reimbursement, as applicable, by Buyer for the costs related thereto, including salaries and benefits for certain of the Company’s BioPharma employees during the transition period. The Company continues to provide the Payroll and Benefits Services under the TSA with respect to a limited number of employees. Such shared services amounted to $186 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, the Buyer is reimbursing the Company, in part, for the salaries and benefits of John A. Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Glenn Miles, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Such salaries and benefits amounted to $188 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019. Through the terms and conditions of the TSA described above, the net amount due to the Buyer is $92 thousand at December 31, 2019 for collections on behalf of the Buyer.
In connection with the closing of the BioPharma Disposal, the SVB ABL and the PFG Term Note were terminated, and all related liens were released.

siParadigm, Inc.

On July 5, 2019, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Clinical Agreement”) by and among the Company and siParadigm, LLC (“siParadigm”), pursuant to which the Company sold 3,000,000to siParadigm, certain assets associated with the Company’s clinical laboratory business (the “Clinical Business,” and such assets, the “Designated Assets”), and agreed to cease

operating its Clinical Business. The Designated Assets include intellectual property, equipment and customer lists associated with the Clinical Business, and for a period of time the Company was providing certain transitional services to siParadigm pursuant to the Clinical Agreement. The cash consideration paid by siParadigm at closing was $747 thousand, which includes $45 thousand for certain equipment plus a $1.0 million advance payment of the Earn-Out (as defined below), less $177 thousand of supplier invoices paid directly by siParadigm, an adjustment of $11 thousand and transaction costs of $110 thousand. The Clinical Business sale (together with the sale of BioServe and the BioPharma Disposal, the “Business Disposals”) was completed on July 8, 2019.

The Clinical Business disposal resulted in the following (in thousands):

Consideration received: 
Cash received at closing$747
Fair value of Earn-Out from siParadigm2,376
Advance from siParadigm received in cash(1,000)
 $2,123
  
Net assets sold: 
Goodwill$1,188
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(287)
 $901
  
Gain on disposal of Clinical Business$1,222

The Earn-Out, to be paid over the 24 months post-closing, is based on fees for all tests performed by siParadigm for the Company’s clinical customers during the 12-month period following the closing (the “Earn-Out”). siParadigm withholds a set percentage from each monthly earn-out payment remitted to the Company as repayment of the Advance from siParadigm. The percentage withheld was 25% for earn-out payments for July through September 2019; siParadigm began withholding 75% from the earn-out payments for October 2019 and will continue withholding 75% each month until the Advance from siParadigm is paid in full. At December 31, 2019, the fair value of the current and long-term portion of the Earn-Out from siParadigm was $747 thousand and $356 thousand, respectively. In addition, the current and long-term portion of the Advance from siParadigm was $566 thousand and $252 thousand, respectively.

Under the Clinical Agreement, the Company agreed to certain non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, including that it will cease performing certain clinical tests and will not solicit or seek business from certain of its customers (other than for the Company’s other lines of business) for a period of three years following the closing date.

The Business Disposals have been classified as discontinuing operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the operations and balances of BioServe and the Company's BioPharma and Clinical operations have been reported as discontinuing operations and removed from all financial disclosures of continuing operations. As permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20, the Company elected to allocate $1.5 million and $389 thousand of interest expense from the Convertible Note to Iliad and Advance from NDX to discontinuing operations during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The interest was allocated based on the ratio of net assets sold less debt required to be paid as a result of the disposal to the Company's net assets (prior to the disposal) plus the consolidated debt not repaid as a result of the disposal. Unless otherwise indicated, information in these notes to consolidated financial statements relates to continuing operations.

2019 Offerings

On January 9, 2019, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“H.C. Wainwright”), relating to an underwritten public offering of 445 thousand shares of its common stock withfor $6.75 per share. The Company received proceeds from the offering of $2.4 million, net of expenses and discounts of $563 thousand. The Company also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a combined public offering price of $4.00 per share and warrant resulting in gross proceeds of $12.0 million ($10.3 million of net proceeds after offering expenses and underwriting discounts). The underwriters also received 450,000 warrants pursuant to the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. The warrants have an exercise price of $5.00, became fully-exercisable at issuance and expire on November 12, 2020. All references to the sales of common stock with warrants mentioned in this paragraph are referred to as the “2015 Offering.”

2016 Offerings

May Offering

On May 25, 2016, we sold 2,467,820 shares of common stock in a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,233,910 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement. These offerings resulted in gross proceeds of $5 million. We sold 2,150,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,075,00031 thousand shares of common stock to certain institutional investors at a combined offering price of $2.00 per common share, and our Chairman of the Board, John Pappajohn, purchased 317,820 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 158,910 shares of common stock at a combined offering price of $2.2025 per common share. In addition, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 123,391 shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants were initially exercisable commencing six months from the issuance date at an exercise price equal to $2.25 per share of common stock.H.C. Wainwright in connection with this offering. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date. All references todate of issuance at a per share price of $7.43. The warrants had a fair value of $168 thousand on the salesdate of common stock with warrants mentionedissuance and are classified as equity in this paragraph, along with the September Offering below, are referred to as the “2016 Offerings.”Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

September Offering

On September 14, 2016, we sold 2,750,000January 26, 2019, the Company issued 507 thousand shares of common stock inat a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,375,000 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement at a combined price of $2.00$6.90 per common share. These offerings resulted in grossThe Company received proceeds from the offering of $5.5 million. In addition, we$3.0 million, net of expenses and discounts of $525 thousand. The Company also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 137,50036 thousand shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership restrictions, the warrants will be initially exercisable six months from the issuance date at an exercise price of $2.25 per share of common stock.underwriter, H.C. Wainwright, in connection with this offering. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date. All references todate of issuance at a per share price of $7.59. The warrants had a fair value of $183 thousand on the salesdate of common stock with warrants mentionedissuance and are classified as equity in this paragraph, along with the May Offering above, areCompany's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The January 9, 2019 and January 26, 2019 offerings will be referred to collectively as the “2016“2019 Offerings.” As disclosed in Note 20, certain of the Company's directors and executive officers purchased shares in the 2019 Offerings at the public offering price.

Note 2. Going Concern

At December 31, 2019, the Company's history of losses required management to assess its ability to continue operating as a going concern, according to ASC 205-40, Going Concern. Even after the disposal of its BioPharma Business and Clinical Business discussed in Note 1, the Company does not project that cash at December 31, 2019 will be sufficient to fund normal operations for the twelve months from the issuance of these financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on reduced losses and improved future cash flows. Alternatively, the Company may be required to raise additional equity or debt capital, or consummate other strategic transactions. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company can provide no assurance that these actions will be successful or that additional sources of financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. In addition, as the Company is located in New Jersey, it is currently under a shelter-in-place mandate and many of its customers worldwide are similarly impacted. The global outbreak of the COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve, and the extent to which the COVID-19 may impact the Company's business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease. As a healthcare provider, the Company is still providing Discovery Services and has yet to experience a slowdown in its project work, however, the future of many projects may be delayed. The Company continues to vigilantly monitor the situation with its primary focus on the health and safety of its employees and clients.

Note 3. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation: We prepare ourThe Company prepares its financial statements on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Segment reporting: Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete information is used by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. We view ourThe Company views its operations and manage ourmanages its business in one operating segment, which is the business of developing and selling diagnostic tests and services.
Liquidity and going concern: At December 31, 2016, our cash position and history of losses required management to asses our ability to continue operating as a going concern, according to FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). Management evaluated the history and operational losses to have a material effect on our ability to continue as a going concern, unless we take actions to alleviate those conditions. Our primary sources of liquidity have been funds generated from our debt financings and equity financings. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, we were able to restructure our senior debt with our lender and secure additional debt capital with another lender to increase our cash positon and have available funds to operate, and we completed the sale of State of New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards in early 2017 (Note 20 Subsequent Events). We have reduced, and plan to continue reducing, our operating expenses, and expect to grow our revenue in 2017 and beyond, and have also increased our cash collections from our customers and third-party payors and plan to continue to improve our cash collection results.
Management believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, taken together with the net proceeds of the debt financing completed in March 2017, will be sufficient to fund the Company's operations for at least the next twelve months after filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Principles of consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cancer Genetics, Inc. and our wholly ownedits wholly-owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Foreign currency: The Company translates the financial statements of its foreign subsidiaries, which have a functional currency in the respective country’s local currency, to U.S. dollars using month-end exchange rates for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates for revenue, costs and expenses. Translation gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are included within the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.
Use of estimates and assumptions: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported

amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include, among others, realization of amounts billed, realization of long-lived assets, realization of intangible assets, accruals for litigation and registration payments, assumptions used to value stock options, warrants and goodwill and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions.associated with the Business Disposals. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Risks and uncertainties: We operateThe Company operates in an industry that is subject to intense competition, government regulation and rapid technological change. Ourthe Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial, operational, technological, regulatory, foreign operations, and other risks, including the potential risk of business failure.
Cash and cash equivalents: Highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. Financial instruments which potentially subject usthe Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. We maintainThe Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with high-credit quality financial institutions. At times, such amounts may exceed insured limits. We haveThe Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we arebelieves it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on ourits cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted cash: Represents cash held at financial institutions which wethe Company may not withdraw and which collateralizes certain of ourthe Company's financial commitments. All of ourthe Company's restricted cash is invested in interest bearing certificates of deposit. OurAt December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company's restricted cash collateralizes a $300,000$350 thousand letter of credit in favor of ourits former landlord, pursuant to the terms of the lease for ourits former Rutherford facility. The letter of credit was released on May 20, 2020.

Revenue recognition: The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605,606. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 as well as SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, for its Biopharmaan adjustment to the balance of accumulated deficit on January 1, 2018. The transition adjustment resulted in a net reduction to the opening balance of accumulated deficit of $2.5 million on January 1, 2018 and increased deferred revenue associated with the former BioPharma Business and Discovery Services by $1.9 million and ASC 954-605, Health Care Entities, Revenue Recognition$600 thousand, respectively, due to a change in the Company's policies for its Clinical Services. These standards generally require that four basic criteria must be met beforerecognized revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. In determining whether the price is fixed or determinable, we consider payment limits imposed by insurance carriers andfor performance obligations fulfilled over time.

Medicare, andRevenue is recorded at the amount expected to be collected, which includes implicit price concessions. Performance obligations are satisfied over time and as study data is transmitted to the customer. Revenue from the Company's Discovery Services is recognized using the time elapsed method and at a point in time as the Company delivers study results to the customers. As results are delivered, the invoices are generated based on contractual rates. Some contracts have prepayments prior to services being rendered that are recorded as deferred revenue. The Company records deferred revenues (contract liabilities) when cash payments are received or due in advance of revenue recorded takes into account the historical percentage of revenue we have collected for each type of test for each payor category. Periodically, an adjustment is made to Clinical Services revenue to record differences between our anticipated cash receipts from third parties, such as insurance carriers and Medicare and actual receipts from such payors. For the periods presented, such adjustments were not significant. For some Clinical Service and Biopharma customers billed directly, revenue is recorded based upon the contractually agreed upon fee schedule. When assessing collectability, we consider whether we have sufficient payment history to reliably estimate a payor’s individual payment patterns. Weits performance, including amounts which are refundable. The Company's customer arrangements do not billcontain any significant financing component.

Discovery Services frequently take time to complete under their respective contacts. These times vary depending on specific contract arrangements including the length of the study and how samples are delivered to the Company for processing. However, the duration of performance obligations for Discovery Services is less than one year.

The Company excludes from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes that it collects from customers for shippingthat are assessed by governmental authorities and handling fees, other than reimbursement of such expenses we incurare both imposed on behalf of our Biopharma clients, and we do not collect any sales or other taxes from customers.concurrent with specific revenue-producing transactions.
Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable are carried at net realizable value, which is the original invoice amount less an estimate for contractual adjustments, discounts and doubtful receivables, the amounts of which are determined by an analysis of individual accounts. OurThe Company's policy for assessing the collectability of receivables is dependent upon the major payor source of the underlying revenue. For Biopharma and Discovery clients,The Company performs an assessment of credit worthiness is performed prior to initial engagement and is reassessedreassesses it periodically. If deemed necessary, an allowance is established on receivables from direct bill clients. For Clinical Services clients, we record revenues and related receivables when the testing process is complete and the results are reported. Revenue is recorded at the expected price, taking into account the patient's ability to pay, as well as anticipated discounts, adjustments and/or contractual allowances, as applicable. After reasonable collection efforts are exhausted, amounts deemed to be uncollectible are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Since the Company only recognizes revenue to the extent it expects to collect such amounts, bad debt expense related to receivables from patient service revenue is recorded in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recorded when received.
Deferred revenue: Payments received in advance of services rendered are recorded as deferred revenue and are subsequently recognized as revenue in the period in which the services are performed.
Fixed assets: Fixed assets consist of diagnostic equipment and furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements.fixtures. Fixed assets are carried at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from five to seventwelve years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements using the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred while improvements are capitalized. Upon sale, retirement or disposal of fixed assets, the accounts are relieved of the cost and the related accumulated depreciation with any gain or loss recorded to the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These computations utilize judgments and assumptions inherent in ourthe Company's estimate of future cash flows to determine recoverability of these assets. If ourthe Company's assumptions about these assets were to change as a result of events or circumstances, wethe Company may be required to record an impairment loss. No impairment loss was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Goodwill: Goodwill resulted from the purchases of Gentris Corporation (“Gentris”) and BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“BioServe”) in 2014 and the purchase of Response Genetics, Inc. (“Response Genetics”)vivoPharm in 2015, as described in Note 16.2017. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, we arethe Company is required to test goodwill for impairment and adjust for impairment losses, if any, at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is likely impairment has occurred. OurThe Company's annual goodwill impairment testing date is October 1 of each year.year using a market approach. No such losses were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized impairment of goodwill of $2.9 million.
Goodwill (in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2018 and 2017 $5,963
Impairment of goodwill (2,873)
Balance, December 31, 2019 $3,090
Equity investment: The Company has an equity investment that does not have a readily determinable market value, with a cost basis of $200 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018. This investment is measured at cost, less impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in ordinary transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Changes in the fair value of the investment are recorded as net appreciation in fair value of investment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the equity investment was $200 thousand and is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. No net appreciation or depreciation in fair value of investment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018, as there were no observable price changes in the stock.
Goodwill (in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $3,187
Purchased through acquisition of Response Genetics 8,842
Balance, December 31, 2015 and 2016 $12,029
Loan guarantee and financingFinancing fees: Loan guarantee fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the guarantee. Financing fees are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt. Debt is recorded net of unamortized debt issuance costs.
Warrant liability: We have issued certain warrants which contain an exercise price adjustment feature in the event we issue additional equity instruments at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrant. We have alsoThe Company issued warrants containingduring the 2016 Offerings and the 2017 Offering that contain a contingent net cash settlement feature. The warrantsfeature, which are described herein as derivative warrants. We account forThe Company also issued warrants that were subject to a 20% reduction if the Company achieved certain financial milestones as part of its 2017 debt refinancing; these derivative warrants were reclassified as liabilities.equity during 2018 when the number of shares issuable under the agreement became fixed.
Derivative warrants are recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and as such, we estimatethe Company estimated the fair value of these warrants using the binomial lattice, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo valuation pricing modelmodels with the assumptions as follows: The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the warrant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield

curve. The expected life of the warrants is based upon the contractual life of the warrants. Prior to 2016, volatility was estimated based on an average of the historical volatilities of the common stock of four entities with characteristics similar to those of the Company. Effective January 1, 2016, we began usingThe Company uses the historical volatility of ourits common stock. We usedstock and the closing price of ourits shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
We computeThe Company computes the fair value of the warrant liability at each reporting period and the change in the fair value is recorded as non-cash expense or non-cash income. The key component in the value of the warrant liability is ourthe Company's stock price, which is subject to significant fluctuation and is not under ourthe Company's control. The resulting effect on ourthe Company's net income (loss)loss is therefore subject to significant fluctuation and will continue to be so until the warrants are exercised, amended or expire. Assuming all other fair value inputs remain constant, wethe Company will record non-cash expense when the stock price increases and non-cash income when the stock price decreases.
Derivative liabilities: The Company evaluates its debt and equity issuances to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives requiring separate recognition in the Company’s financial statements. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability and the change in fair value is recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated results of operations. In circumstances where there are multiple embedded instruments that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-

current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within twelve months of the balance sheet date.
When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption and are recorded as interest expense in the consolidated results of operations.
Income taxes: Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Deferred income taxes are also recognized for net operating loss (“NOLs”) carryforwards that are available to offset future taxable income and research and development credits.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We haveThe Company has established a full valuation allowance on ourits deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018; therefore, we havethe Company has not recognized any deferred tax benefit or expense in the periods presented. However, the sale of state NOLs and research and development credits are included in current income tax benefit during the period of the sale.
ASC 740, Income Taxes, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740 provides that a tax benefit from uncertain tax positions may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized. ASC 740 also provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. At December 31, 20162019 and 2015 we2018 the Company had no uncertain tax positions.positions, and the Company does not expect any changes with regards to uncertain tax positions during the year ending December 31, 2020.
OurThe Company's policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. There is no accrual for interest or penalties on our consolidated balance sheetsthe Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20162019 or 2015,2018, and we havethe Company has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and Other Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 20162019 or 2018.
The Company's major taxing jurisdictions are the United States, Australia and New Jersey. The Company's tax years for 2015 through 2018 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. Generally, as of December 31, 2019, the Company is no longer subject to federal and state examinations by tax authorities for years before 2015. In Australia, the Company's tax returns are subject to examination for five years from the date of filing. However, to the extent allowed by law, the tax authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses or tax credits were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the amount of the net operating loss or credit carryforward.
Patents and other intangible assets: We accountThe Company accounts for intangible assets under ASC 350-30. Patents consisting of legal fees incurred are initially recorded at cost. We haveThe Company has also acquired patents that are initially recorded at fair value. Patents are amortized over the useful lives of the assets, which range from seven to ten years, using the straight-line method. Certain patents are in the legal application process and therefore are not currently being amortized. We reviewThe Company reviews the carrying value of patents at the end of each reporting period. Based upon ourthe Company's review, there werewas no patent impairmentsimpairment related to continuing operations in 20162019 or 2015.2018.
Other intangible assets consist of software acquired with Response Genetics,vivoPharm’s customer list and trade name, which are all amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range from three to fiveof ten years.

Research and development: Research and development costs are associated with service and product development include direct costs of payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation and supplies and anthe Company's allocation of indirect costs including rent, utilities, depreciation and repairs and maintenance.loss from its joint venture described in Note 19. All research and development costs are expensed as they are incurred.
Stock-based compensation: Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values on the grant date. We estimateThe Company estimates the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods using the straight-line method. See additional information in Note 12.14.

All issuances of stock options or other issuances of equity instruments to employees as the consideration for services received by usthe Company are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instrument issued.
We account for stock-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees. Under ASC 505-50, we determine the fair value of the warrants or stock-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is

more reliably measurable. Stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees are recorded in expense and additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity (deficit) over the applicable service periods based on the fair value of the awards or consideration received at the vesting date.
Fair value of financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their estimated fair values due to the short termshort-term maturities of those financial instruments. The fair value of warrants recorded as derivative liabilities, contingent consideration andthe note payable to VenturEast, the Earn-Out from siParadigm, and the Excess Consideration Note are described in Notes 1416 and 15.17.
Joint venture accounted for under the equity method: The Company records its joint venture investment following the equity method of accounting, reflecting its initial investment in the joint venture and its share of the joint venture’s net earnings or losses and distributions. The Company’s share of the joint venture’s net loss was approximately $73,000 in 2016$0 and $707,000 in 2015$154 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and is included in research and development expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss. The Company has a net receivable due from the joint venture of approximately $10,000$10 thousand at both December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, which is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See additional information in Note 18.19.
Subsequent events: We haveThe Company has evaluated potential subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.issued within our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Adopted Accounting PronouncementsStandards

: In February 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)guidance codified in ASC 842, Leases, which providessupersedes the guidance for accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, the Company will be requiredin former ASC 840, Leases, to recognize theincrease transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.

balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements (with the exception of short-term leases). In May 2014,July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), requiring an entityAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-11 to the existing transition guidance that allows entities to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the amountopening balance of revenue to which it expectsaccumulated deficit in the period of adoption. Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842 using this new transition guidance. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be entitledreported under the accounting standard in effect for those periods.
The Company has elected to use the package of practical expedients, which allows it to not (1) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are considered or contain leases; (2) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (3) reassess the initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which permits entities to use hindsight in determining the lease term and assessing impairment.
The most significant impact of adopting ASC 842 is related to the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease obligations for operating leases. The Company's accounting for finance leases remains substantially unchanged. The adoption of ASC 842 had no impact on the Company's consolidated statements of operations or total cash flows from operations.
The cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company's consolidated January 1, 2019 balance sheet for the transferadoption of promised goods or services to customers. As issued and amended, ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a full retrospective or retrospective with cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. Early adoption is permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company believes its Biopharma Service revenue could be affected by the new standard. The Company is presently evaluating its Biopharma Service contacts for multiple elements and variable consideration provisions that may affect the timing of revenue recognition subsequent to ASU 2014-09's adoption. The Company expects to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach, which involves applying the new standard to all contracts initiated on or after the effective date and recording an adjustment to opening equity for pre-existing contracts that have remaining obligationsASC 842 was as of the effective date.follows (in thousands):
  As of December 31, 2018 Adjustment for Adoption of ASC 842 As of January 1, 2019
ASSETS      
Current assets of discontinuing operations $23,250
 $2,327
 $25,577
Operating lease right-of-use assets 
 238
 238
  $23,250
 $2,565
 $25,815
LIABILITIES      
Current liabilities of discontinuing operations $19,189
 $2,327
 $21,516
Deferred rent payable and other 154
 (154) 
Obligations under operating leases, current portion 
 204
 204
Obligations under operating leases, less current portion 
 188
 188
  $19,343
 $2,565
 $21,908

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) “Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The updated standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on statement of cash flow presentation for eight specific cash flow issues where diversity in practice exists. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statements of cash flows. The updated standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. We do not expect ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): “SimplifyingSimplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment,” which removes the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill

impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The Company adopted this standard July 1, 2019. Because the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, isthe Company did not have to fair value all of its assets and liabilities to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. Instead the Company impaired goodwill for the difference between the fair value of the Company and the book value of the Company’s stockholders’ equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The standard will become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December

15, 2019, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is permitted and applied prospectively. We docurrently evaluating whether it will early adopt. The guidance is not expect ASU 2017-04expected to have a material impact to our financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): “Restricted Cash,” clarifying the treatment of restricted cash accounts on the statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 indicates that restricted cash accounts should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of year and end of year total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on theCompany's consolidated financial statements.
Earnings (loss) per share: Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the numerator is adjusted for the change in fair value of the warrant liability (only if dilutive) and the denominator is increased to include the number of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. For all periods presented, all common stock equivalents outstanding were anti-dilutive.
Basic net loss and diluted net loss per share data were computed as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
  2016 2015
Numerator:    
Net (loss) for basic earnings per share $(15,803) $(20,184)
Less change in fair value of warrant liability 
 35
Net (loss) for diluted earnings per share $(15,803) $(20,219)
Denominator:    
Weighted-average basic common shares outstanding 15,861
 10,298
Assumed conversion of dilutive securities:    
Common stock purchase warrants 
 1
Potentially dilutive common shares 
 1
Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted-average shares 15,861
 10,299
Basic net loss per share $(1.00) $(1.96)
Diluted net loss per share $(1.00) $(1.96)

The following table summarizes potentially dilutive adjustments to the weighted average number of common shares which were excluded from the calculation (in thousands):
  2016 2015
Common stock purchase warrants 7,033
 4,372
Stock options 2,198
 1,961
Restricted shares of common stock 80
 121
  9,311
 6,454

Note 3. Revenue and Accounts Receivable

Revenue by service type for each of the years ended December 31 is comprised of the following (in thousands):
  2016 2015
Biopharma Services $15,321
 $11,564
Clinical Services 10,651
 5,651
Discovery Services 1,077
 825
  $27,049
 $18,040

The table above includes approximately $2,085,000 of biopharma services revenue and approximately $6,190,000 of clinical services revenue from our acquisition of Response Genetics for the year ended December 31, 2016. The table above includes approximately $486,000 of biopharma services revenue and approximately $1,265,000 of clinical services revenue from our acquisition of Response Genetics for the period October 9, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
Accounts receivable by service type at December 31, 2016 and 2015 consists of the following (in thousands):
  2016 2015
Biopharma Services $3,683
 $3,238
Clinical Services 8,972
 3,733
Discovery Services 480
 314
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,387) (664)
  $11,748
 $6,621

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2014 $251
Additions to allowance for doubtful accounts 413
Balance, December 31, 2015 664
Additions to allowance for doubtful accounts 723
Balance, December 31, 2016 $1,387
  2019 2018
Common stock purchase warrants 279
 336
Stock options 64
 100
Restricted shares of common stock 
 1
Convertible note 
 103
Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd. 
 85
  343
 625

Revenue for Biopharma Services are customized solutions for patient stratification and treatment selection through an extensive suite of DNA-based testing services. Biopharma Services are billedReclassifications: Certain items in the prior year consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Clinical Services are tests performedconform to provide information on diagnosis, prognosis and theranosis of cancers to guide patient management. Clinical Services tests can be billed to Medicare, another third party insurer or the referring community hospital or other healthcare facility. Discovery Services are services that provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new DNA-based biomarkers for disease. The breakdown of our Clinical Services revenue (as a percent of total revenue) is as follows:

  2016 2015
Medicare 14% 10%
Other insurers 20% 12%
Other healthcare facilities 5% 9%
Total Clinical Services 39% 31%
We have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of test ordering sites. Test ordering sites account for all of our Clinical Services revenue. Our test ordering sites are largely hospitals, cancer centers, reference laboratories, physician offices and biopharmaceutical companies. Oncologists and pathologists at these sites order the tests on behalf of the needs of their oncology patients or as part of a clinical trial sponsored by a biopharmaceutical company in which the patient is being enrolled. We generally do not have formal, long-term written agreements with such test ordering sites, and, as a result, we may lose a significant test ordering site at any time.
The top five test ordering clients during 2016 and 2015 accounted for 31% and 49%, respectively, of our testing volumes, with 6% and 18%, respectively, of the test volume coming from community hospitals. During the year ended December 31, 2016, one Biopharma client accounted for approximately 16% of our revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2015, one Biopharma client accounted for approximately 19% of our revenue.current presentation.

Note 4. Discontinuing Operations

As described in Note 1, the Company sold its India subsidiary, BioServe, in April 2018 and its BioPharma Business and Clinical Business in July 2019. In conjunction with the BioPharma Disposal, the Company repaid its debt to SVB and PFG. The Company elected to allocate $1.5 million and $389 thousand of interest expense from the Convertible Note to Iliad and Advance from NDX to discontinuing operations during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Summarized results of the Company's consolidated discontinuing operations are as follows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Revenue$10,066
 $22,538
Cost of revenues7,554
 15,634
Gross profit2,512
 6,904
Operating expenses:   
Research and development937
 2,334
General and administrative4,675
 12,468
Sales and marketing1,527
 4,071
Restructuring costs194
 2,320
Transaction costs560
 
Impairment of patents and other intangible assets601
 
Total operating expenses8,494
 21,193
Loss from discontinuing operations(5,982) (14,289)
Other income (expense):   
Interest expense(2,211) (1,801)
Gain on disposal of Clinical Business1,222
 
Gain on disposal of BioPharma Business7,148
 
Loss on disposal of BioServe
 (78)
Total other income (expense)6,159
 (1,879)
Net income (loss) from discontinuing operations$177
 $(16,168)

Consolidated carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities from discontinuing operations were as follows as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 2019 2018
Current assets of discontinuing operations:   
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,536 in 2019; $3,462 in 2018$71
 $6,261
Other current assets
 1,542
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation
 3,498
Patents and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
 655
Goodwill
 11,294
Current assets of discontinuing operations$71
 $23,250
    
Current liabilities of discontinuing operations   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$1,137
 $8,470
Due to Interpace Biosciences, Inc.92
 
Obligations under finance leases
 610
Deferred revenue
 1,337
Line of credit
 2,621
Term note
 6,000
Deferred rent payable and other
 151
Current liabilities of discontinuing operations$1,229
 $19,189

Cash flows used in discontinuing operations consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):


  Years Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Income (loss) from discontinuing operations $177
 $(16,168)
     
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from discontinuing operations to net cash used in operating activities, discontinuing operations    
Depreciation 542
 1,292
Amortization 613
 21
Provision for bad debts 1,074
 2,514
Stock-based compensation 107
 391
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets 358
 
Amortization of discount of debt and debt issuance costs 601
 291
Interest added to Convertible Note 343
 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets and sale of India subsidiary 
 204
Loss on extinguishment of debt 328
 
Gain on disposal of Clinical business (1,222) 
Gain on disposal of BioPharma business (7,148) 
Change in working capital components:    
Accounts receivable 845
 745
Other current assets 398
 417
Other non-current assets 2
 50
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue (2,163) 886
Obligations under operating leases (217) 
Deferred rent payable and other (151) 6
Due to IDXG 92
 
Net cash used in operating activities, discontinuing operations $(5,421) $(9,351)

Note 5. Revenue

The Company has remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 of $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Deferred revenue of $40 thousand from December 31, 2018 was recognized as revenue in 2019. Remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2019 of approximately $800 thousand are expected to be recognized as revenue in 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, three customers accounted for approximately 61% of the Company's consolidated revenue from continuing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2018, three customers accounted for approximately 53% of the Company's consolidated revenue from continuing operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, approximately 24% and 33%, respectively, of the Company's continuing operations revenue was earned outside the United States and collected in local currency.

Note 6. Other Current Assets

At December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands): 

 2016 2015 2019 2018
Inventory $146
 $133
Lab supplies $77
 $
Prepaid expenses 2,028
 1,985
 469
 267
 $2,174
 $2,118
 $546
 $267


Note 5.7. Lease Commitments

We lease ourOperating Leases

The Company leases its laboratory, research facility and administrative office space under various operating leases. We have approximately 17,900 square feet ofFollowing the Business Disposals, the Company assigned its office and laboratory spaceleases in Rutherford,North Carolina and New Jersey 24,900to Buyer. At December 31, 2019, the Company has approximately 5,800 square feet in Morrisville, North Carolina, 19,100Hershey, Pennsylvania and 1,959 square feet in Los Angeles, California, 10,000 square feet in Hyderabad, India and 2,700 square feet in Shanghai, China. We haveBundoora, Australia. The Company has escalating lease agreements for both our New Jerseyits Pennsylvania and North CarolinaAustralia spaces, which expire January 2018in November 2020 and May 2020,June 2021, respectively. These leases require monthly rent with periodic rent increases that vary from $1 to $2 per square foot of the rented premises per year.increases. The difference between minimum rent and straight-line rent iswas recorded as deferred rent payable.payable until the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, as described in Note 1. The terms of ourthe Company's former New Jersey lease requirerequired that a $300,000$350 thousand security deposit for the facility be held in a stand by letter of credit in favor of the landlord (see Note 7)9). In addition, under the assignment of leases related to the Company's New Jersey headquarters, the Buyer became obligated to replace the $350 thousand letter of credit held by the New Jersey landlord and secured by the Company's cash collateral in August 2019; however, the letter of credit was not replaced until April 2020. The cash collateral was released on May 20, 2020.

We acquired officeThe Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, obligations under operating leases, current portion, and obligations under operating leases, less current portion on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.

ROU assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease obligations represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease obligations are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company's incremental borrowing rate was determined by adjusting its secured borrowing interest rate for the longer-term nature of its leases. The Company's variable lease payments primarily consist of maintenance and other operating expenses from its real estate leases. Variable lease payments are excluded from the ROU assets and lease liabilities and are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives incurred. The Company's lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected to account for these lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. The Company is also electing not to apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases of twelve months or less and instead will recognize lease payments as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The components of operating and finance lease expense were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2019 for continuing operations (in thousands):

Finance lease cost:  
Amortization of right-of use assets $35
Interest on lease liabilities 13
Operating lease cost 220
Short-term lease cost 109
Variable lease cost 55
  $432

Supplemental cash flow related to operating leases of the Company's continuing operations was as follows for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

Cash paid amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:  
Operating cash flows used for operating leases $220


The Company did not enter into any significant operating leases during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Finance Leases

The Company also leases scientific equipment under long termvarious finance leases, which have been capitalized at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Finance leases are included in fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and obligations under finance leases. The equipment under these capitalfinance leases had a cost of $916,600$302 thousand and accumulated depreciation of $279,788,$84 thousand, as of December 31, 2016.2019.

Minimum future lease payments under all capitalfinance and operating leases as of December 31, 20162019 are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Capital
Leases
 
Operating
Leases
 Total 
Finance
Leases
 
Operating
Leases
 Total
December 31,            
2017 $136
 $1,712
 $1,848
2018 130
 513
 643
2019 113
 383
 496
2020 102
 175
 277
 $84
 $209
 $293
2021 68
 
 68
 44
 11
 55
Thereafter 
 
 
2022 36
 
 36
2023 36
 
 36
2024 9
 
 9
Total minimum lease payments $549
 $2,783
 $3,332
 209
 220
 429
Less amount representing interest 66
     34
 17
 51
Present value of net minimum obligations 483
     175
 203
 378
Less current obligation under capital lease 109
    
Long-term obligation under capital lease $374
    
Less current obligation under finance and operating leases 68
 193
 261
Long-term obligation under finance and operating leases $107
 $10
 $117

Rent expenseOther supplemental information related to operating and finance leases of the Company's continuing operations was as follows at December 31, 2019:

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
Operating leases0.99
Finance leases3.35
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leases7.98%
Finance leases8.21%

Note 8. Financing

Convertible Note

On July 17, 2018, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (“Iliad”), with an initial principal amount of $2.6 million (“Convertible Note”). The Company received consideration of $2.5 million, reflecting an original issue discount of $100 thousand and expenses payable by the Company of $25 thousand. The Convertible Note had an 18-month term and carried interest at 10% per annum. The note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $24.00 per share upon 5 trading days’ notice, subject to certain adjustments (standard dilution) and ownership limitations specified in the Convertible Note and resulted in a beneficial conversion feature discount of $328 thousand at inception.

Iliad could redeem any portion of the Convertible Note, at any time after six months from the issue date upon 5 trading days’ notice, subject to a maximum monthly redemption amount of $650 thousand, with the Company having the option to pay such redemptions in cash, the Company’s common stock at the Conversion Price, or by a combination thereof, subject to certain conditions, including that the stock price is $30.00 per share or higher. At maturity, the Company could pay the outstanding balance in cash, the Company’s common stock at the Conversion Price, or by a combination thereof, subject to certain conditions. The

Convertible Note provided that in the event of default, the lender may, at its option, elect to increase the outstanding balance applying the default effect (defined as outstanding balance at date of default multiplied by 15% plus outstanding amount) by providing written notice to the Company. In addition, the interest rate increases to 22% upon default. The default effect and default interest rate provisions qualified as embedded derivatives with an estimated fair value of $55 thousand at December 31, 2018.

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a standstill agreement with Iliad, which among other things, provided that Iliad would not seek to redeem any portion of the Convertible Note prior to April 15, 2019 and, as consideration for the standstill, increased the outstanding balance of the note by $202 thousand. In May 2019, Iliad agreed to a second standstill until May 31, 2019. As consideration, the conversion price was reduced to $6.82 for $1.3 million of the balance of the Convertible Note; the remainder was still convertible at $24.00. The reduction in the conversion price increased the fair value of the embedded conversion option by $547 thousand. The future cash flows of the Convertible Note changed by more than 10% as a result of the second standstill, so the Company amortized the remaining debt discount and debt issuance costs of $37 thousand, resulting in a loss on debt extinguishment of $584 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019, of which $328 thousand was allocated to discontinuing operations. Loss on debt extinguishment allocated to continuing operations was recorded in interest expense.

As of June 20, 2019, the Company was in default on the Convertible Note. The Convertible Note began accruing interest at the default rate and the outstanding balance was increased by the default effect ($409 thousand) upon the notice of default.

In May 2019, Iliad converted $350 thousand of the Convertible Note into an aggregate of 51 thousand shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $6.82 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 174 thousand shares of common stock to Iliad in exchange for the return of $612 thousand of principal amounts due under the Convertible Note using the exchange date fair market value of the Company's common stock. In October 2019, the Convertible Note was settled for $2.7 million, in cash, including accrued interest of $439 thousand. Of this settlement, $1.3 million was paid directly by Atlas Sciences, LLC ("Atlas Sciences") through the issuance of a new note payable to Atlas Sciences described below.

The Convertible Note was the general unsecured obligation of the Company. At December 31, 2019, the Convertible Note had a balance of $0. At December 31, 2018, the Convertible Note had a balance of $2.5 million, net of discounts and unamortized debt issuance costs of $136 thousand and $8 thousand, respectively. The effective interest rate during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, was approximately $1.770% and 40%. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $420 thousand and $347 thousand, respectively, of contractual interest and amortization of the beneficial conversion feature. In addition, the Company incurred $40 thousand of amortization of other debt discounts and issuance costs, $202 thousand of standstill fees, $409 thousand of default penalties, and $547 thousand of additional cost related to reducing the conversion price on a portion of the debt during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company incurred $85 thousand of amortization of other debt discounts and issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Advance from NovellusDx, Ltd.

On September 18, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (“Merger Agreement”) with NovellusDx, Ltd. (“NDX”). In connection with signing the Merger Agreement, NDX loaned the Company $1.5 million. Interest originally accrued on the outstanding balance at 10.75% per annum (“Advance from NDX”), and the advance was to mature upon the earlier of March 31, 2019 or the date on which the Merger Agreement was terminated in accordance with its terms (or ninety days thereafter in the case of certain causes for termination). Upon certain events of default, NDX would be able to convert all, but not less than all, of the outstanding balance into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $18.18 per share, which qualified as a contingent beneficial conversion feature that would only be recognized if a default occurred.

On December 15, 2018, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement. As a result, the Advance from NDX, plus interest thereon, became due and payable on March 15, 2019, and the interest rate was increased to 21% due to an event of default. As a result of the default, the Company recognized the beneficial conversion feature discount of $1.2 million. The default interest rate provision qualified as an embedded derivative with an estimated fair value of $31 thousand at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the Credit Agreement was $1.5 million, which is presented net of the unamortized beneficial conversion feature of $965 thousand in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to the NDX Settlement Agreement, defined in the next paragraph, the effective interest rate on the Advance from NDX was 81% and 69% during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company recognized $1.2 million and $1.1$261 thousand of interest and amortization of the beneficial conversion feature during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of these amounts, $637 thousand and $147 thousand are included in discontinued operations.

On October 21, 2019, the Company and NDX entered into a settlement agreement (“NDX Settlement Agreement”). The NDX Settlement Agreement required the Company to pay $100 thousand on the date of execution and $1.0 million upon receipt of proceeds from the Excess Consideration Note. The $1.0 million payment was made in October 2019. As a result of such payment,

pursuant to the NDX Settlement Agreement, the balance of the Advance from NDX was reduced from $708 thousand to $450 thousand and each party released the other from all claims under the original credit agreement and the Merger Agreement. The remaining amount due is to be paid in nine monthly payments of $50 thousand commencing in November 2019. If the Company fails to make any of the required monthly payments, NDX may convert all, but not less than all, of the amounts then owing into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $4.50 per share. The NDX Settlement Agreement adjusted the interest rate of the obligation to 0%. The Company recognized a gain on troubled debt restructuring relating to the NDX Settlement Agreement of $258 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019. The gain was the difference between the book value of the debt at settlement and the future payments due.

The Advance from NDX is the general unsecured obligation of the Company. At December 31, 2019, the Advance from NDX had a principal balance of $350 thousand.

Note Payable, Net

On October 21, 2019, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Atlas Sciences, an affiliate of Iliad, for $1.3 million (“Note Payable”). The Company received consideration of $1.3 million, reflecting an original issue discount of $88 thousand and expenses payable by the Company of $10 thousand. The Note Payable has a 12-month term and bears interest at 10% per annum. The proceeds from the Note Payable were utilized to partially repay the Convertible Note. Atlas Sciences may redeem any portion of the note, at any time after six months from the issuance date upon three business days' notice, subject to a monthly maximum redemption amount of $300 thousand. The Company may prepay the Note Payable at any time without penalty. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, Atlas Sciences can elect to adjust the interest rate to 22% per annum and/or apply the default effect, which increases the outstanding balance of the Note Payable by 15% on the date of default. At December 31, 2019, the Note Payable had a principal balance of $1.3 million, which is presented net of discounts and unamortized debt issuance costs of $64 thousand and $7 thousand, respectively.

All of the Company's debt matures in 2020.

Note 6. Bank Term Note and Line9. Letter of Credit

On May 7, 2015, we entered intoThe Company maintains a debt financing facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) to refinance the Company’s cash collateralized loan from Wells Fargo and to provide an additional working capital line of credit. The SVB credit facility provides for a $6.0 million term note (“Term Note”) and a revolving line of credit (“Line of Credit”) for an amount not to exceed the lesser of (i) $4.0 million or (ii) an amount equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. The Term Note requires interest-only payments through April 30, 2016 and beginning May 1, 2016, monthly principal payments of approximately$167,000 will be required plus interest through maturity on April 1, 2019. The interest rate of the Term Note is the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 2%, with a floor of 5.25% (5.75% and 5.50% at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively) and an additional deferred interest payment of $180,000 will be due upon maturity. The Line of Credit requires monthly interest-only payments of the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.5% (5.25% and 5.00% at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively) and matures on May 7, 2017. The loan agreement requires maintenance of certain financial ratios and grants SVB a first security interest in substantially all Company assets (other than our intellectual property). At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the principal balance of the Term Note was $4,666,667 and $6,000,000, respectively, and the principal balance of the Line of Credit was $0. On January 28, 2016, the Line of Credit was amended with SVB and as of December 31, 2016, we were no longer able to draw on the Line of Credit until we raised approximately $2.5 million of additional equity. The Term Loan and Line of Credit were subsequently paid, see Note 20 Subsequent Events.

The following is a summary of long-term debt as of December 31 (in thousands):


  2016 2015
Term note, principal balance $4,667
 $6,000
Less unamortized debt issuance costs 13
 25
Term note, net 4,654
 5,975
Less current maturities 2,000
 1,333
Long-term portion $2,654
 $4,642

Principal maturities of the Term Note as of December 31, 2016 are as follows: 2017 - $2,000,000; 2018 - $2,000,000; 2019 - $666,667.

Note 7. Letter of Credit
We maintain a $300,000$350 thousand letter of credit in favor of ourits former landlord pursuant to the terms of the lease for ourits Rutherford facility. At December 31, 20162019 and 2018, the letter of credit was fully secured by the restricted cash disclosed on ourthe Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. In addition, under the assignment of leases related to the Company's New Jersey headquarters, the Buyer became obligated to replace a $350 thousand letter of credit held by the New Jersey landlord and secured by the Company's cash collateral in August 2019; however, the letter of credit was not replaced until April 2020. The cash collateral was released on May 20, 2020.

Note 8.10. Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are summarized by major classifications as follows (in thousands):

 2016 2015 2019 2018
Equipment $9,094
 $8,442
 $1,000
 $842
Furniture and fixtures 1,068
 1,083
 53
 52
Leasehold improvements 932
 932
 11,094
 10,457
 1,053
 894
Less accumulated depreciation (6,356) (4,388) (495) (336)
Net fixed assets $4,738
 $6,069
 $558
 $558

Depreciation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $159 thousand and $310 thousand, respectively.
The fixed assets in the table above include foreign currency translation adjustments that were de minimus during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Note 9.11. Patents and Other Intangible Assets

Patents and other intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 20162019 and 2015:2018:
     
     Weighted-Average
     Weighted-Average     Remaining
 (in thousands) (in thousands) Amortization (in thousands) (in thousands) Amortization
 2016 2015 Period 2019 2018 Period
Patents $843
 $724
 10 years $981
 $981
 3 years
Patents - Response Genetics acquisition 800
 800
 7 years
Software - Response Genetics acquisition 446
 446
 2 years
Customer list 2,738
 2,738
 8 years
Trade name 477
 477
 8 years
 2,089
 1,970
  4,196
 4,196
 
Less accumulated amortization (586) (243)  (1,301) (847) 
Net patent and other intangible assets $1,503
 $1,727
  $2,895
 $3,349
 
The customer list and trade name in the table above include foreign currency translation adjustments that were de minimus during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Amortization expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $454 thousand and $491 thousand, respectively. Future amortization expense for legally approved patents (excluding patent applications in progress of approximately $444,000 as of December 31, 2016) and other intangible assets, is estimated as follows (in thousands):

2017$289
2018200
2019153
2020145
2021139
2022 and thereafter133
Total$1,059
2020$465
2021465
2022424
2023344
2024337
Thereafter860
Total$2,895

Note 10.12. Income Taxes

Loss from continuing and discontinuing operations before income tax provision (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):

  For the Year Ended December 31
  2019 2018
United States $(5,619) $(19,793)
Foreign (1,601) (580)
Total $(7,220) $(20,373)

The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing and discontinuing operations consisted of the following (in thousands):


  For the Year Ended December 31
  2019 2018
Current:    
State $(512) $
     
Deferred:    
Federal $687
 $(4,112)
State 766
 12
Foreign (167) 52
  1,286
 (4,048)
Change in valuation allowance (1,286) 4,048
Total deferred $
 $
     
Total $(512) $

The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing and discontinuing operations for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 differs from the approximate amount of income tax benefit determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pre-tax loss, due to the following:
 
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Amount
(in thousands)
 % of
Pretax
Loss
 Amount
(in thousands)
 % of
Pretax
Loss
 Amount
(in thousands)
 % of
Pretax
Loss
 Amount
(in thousands)
 % of
Pretax
Loss
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate $(5,531) 35.0 % $(7,479) 35.0 % $(1,516) 21.0 % $(4,278) 21.0 %
State tax provision, net of federal tax benefit (777) 4.9 % (878) 4.1 % 223
 (3.1)% 226
 (1.1)%
Tax credits (342) 2.2 % (232) 1.1 % 136
 (1.9)% (60) 0.3 %
Stock based compensation 206
 (1.3)% 201
 (0.9)% 997
 (13.8)% 211
 (1.0)%
Derivative warrants (534) 3.4 % (12) 0.1 % (30) 0.4 % (766) 3.7 %
Investor consideration 
  % (110) 0.5 %
Change in valuation allowance 7,459
 (47.2)% 6,617
 (31.0)% (1,286) 17.8 % 4,048
 (19.9)%
Goodwill impairment 604
 (8.4)% 
  %
Foreign operations 251
 (1.6)% 283
 (1.3)% 109
 (1.5)% 508
 (2.5)%
Gain on sale of businesses 246
 (3.4)% 
  %
Other (732) 4.6 % 426
 (2.1)% 5
  % 111
 (0.5)%
Income tax (benefit) provision $
  % $(1,184) 5.5 % $(512) 7.1 % $
  %
During November 2015, we
On April 4, 2019, the Company sold $15,990,475 of gross State of New Jersey net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards relating to the 2013 and 2014 tax years as well as $289,978 of research and development tax credits, resulting in the receipt of $1,183,564, net of expenses. On February 22, 2017, we sold $18,177,059$11.6 million of gross State of New Jersey NOL’s relating to the 2014 and 20152017 tax yearsyear as well as $167,572$72 thousand of state research and development tax credits, resulting in the receipt of approximately $950,000,$512 thousand, net of expenses.
We transferred the NOL carryforwards through the Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program sponsored by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority.
Approximate deferred taxes consist of the following components as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 

 2016 2015 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $32,273
 $25,085
 $26,317
 $25,999
Accruals and reserves 1,829
 1,100
 3,014
 4,328
Non-qualified stock options 3,882
 3,357
Stock based compensation 75
 1,020
Research and development tax credits 1,331
 989
 1,800
 1,936
Derivative warrant liability 26
 26
 17
 17
Investment in joint venture 250
 251
 161
 162
Goodwill 
 283
Fixed assets 
 78
Other 8
 6
 6
 6
Total deferred tax assets 39,599
 31,175
 31,390
 33,468
Less valuation allowance (38,634) (31,175) (30,497) (31,783)
Net deferred tax assets 965
 
 893
 1,685
Deferred tax liabilities        
Fixed assets (401) 
 (132) (352)
Goodwill and intangible assets (564) 
 (761) (1,333)
Net deferred taxes $
 $
 $
 $

Due to a history of losses we havethe Company has generated since inception, we believethe Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018. Therefore, we havethe Company has recorded a full valuation allowance on ourits deferred tax assets. WeAs a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the federal net operating losses incurred after 2017 will have an indefinite carryforward. At December 31, 2019, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $87$117.5 million, as of which $98.9 million could expire over time, beginning in 2027, if not used. At December 31, 2016. The2019, the Company has $2.7 million of Australian net operating loss carryforwards will begin toand $18.2 million of New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2019, the Company also had $1.8 million of federal research and development tax credits, which expire in 2027.varying amounts between the years 2020 and 2038. Utilization of these carryforwards is subject to limitation due to ownership changes that may delay the utilization of a portion of the carryforwards.

Note 11.13. Capital Stock

Cantor Sales Agreement

In July 2015, we sold 2,800 shares of common stock that resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $34,000.

2015 Offering2019 Offerings

On November 12, 2015, we sold 3,000,000January 9, 2019, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with H.C. Wainwright, relating to an underwritten public offering of 445 thousand shares of the Company's common stock with warrants to purchase an aggregatefor $6.75 per share. The Company received proceeds from the offering of 3,000,000$2.4 million, net of expenses and discounts of $563 thousand.

On January 26, 2019, the Company issued 507 thousand shares of common stock at a combined public offering price of $4.00$6.90 per share and warrant resulting in grossshare. The Company received proceeds from the offering of $12.0$3.0 million, ($10.3 millionnet of net proceeds after offering expenses and underwriting discounts). The underwriters also received 450,000 warrants pursuant to the partial exercisediscounts of $525 thousand.

Conversions and Exchanges of Debt into Common Stock

In May 2019, Iliad converted $350 thousand of the over-allotment option. The warrants haveConvertible Note into an exerciseaggregate of 51 thousand shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $5.00, became fully-exercisable at issuance and expire on November 12, 2020.$6.82 per share.

2016 Offerings

May Offering

On May 25, 2016, we sold 2,467,820 shares of common stock in a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,233,910 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement. These offerings resulted in gross proceeds of $5 million. We sold 2,150,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,075,000During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 174 thousand shares of common stock to certain institutional investors at a combined offering priceIliad in exchange for the return of $2.00 per common share, and our Chairman$612 thousand of principal amounts due under the Convertible Note using the exchange date fair market value of the Board, John Pappajohn, purchased 317,820 shares ofCompany's common stock and warrantsstock.

Stock Issued to purchase 158,910 shares of common stock at a combined offering price of $2.2025 per common share. In addition, weVendor

On December 4, 2019, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 123,3915 thousand shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants were initially exercisable commencing six months from the issuance date at an exercise price equal to $2.25 per share of common stock. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date.

September Offering

On September 14, 2016, we sold 2,750,000 shares of common stock in a public offering and warrants to purchase 1,375,000 shares of common stock in a concurrent private placement at a combined price of $2.00 per common share. These offerings resulted in gross proceeds of $5.5 million. In addition, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 137,500 shares of common stock to the placement agent. Subject to certain ownership restrictions, the warrants will be initially exercisable six months from the issuance date at an exercise price of $2.25 per share of common stock. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date.

Stock Issued to Consultant

On October 24, 2016, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock to Maxim, LLC (“Maxim”)vendor at a value of $1.50$7.86 per common share, inusing the exchange for consulting services.date fair market value of the Company's common stock.

Preferred Stock

We areThe Company is currently authorized to issue up to 9,764,0009.8 million shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, no shares of preferred stock were outstanding.

Note 12.14. Stock-Based Compensation

We haveThe Company has two equity incentive plans: the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”, and together with the 2008 Plan, the “Stock Option Plans”). The Stock Option Plans are meant to provide additional incentive to officers, employees and consultants to remain in ourthe Company's employment. Options granted are generally exercisable for up to 10 years.

The Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Plan on June 30, 2011 and reserved 350,000105 thousand shares of common stock for issuance, under the 2011 Plan. On May 22, 2014, May 14, 2015 and on October 11, 2016, the stockholders voted to increase the number of shares reserved by the plan to 2,000,000, 2,650,000, and 3,150,000 shares of common stock, respectively, under several types of equity awards including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and other awards defined in the 2011 Plan. At December 31, 2019, 33 thousand shares remain available for future awards under the 2011 Plan.
 
The Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Plan on April 29, 2008 and reserved 251,47518 thousand shares of common stock for issuance underissuance. Effective April 9, 2018, the plan. OnCompany is no longer able to issue options from the 2008 Plan. Prior to April 1, 2010,9, 2018, the stockholders voted to increase the number of shares reserved by the plan to 550,000. We areCompany was authorized to issue incentive stock options or non-statutory stock options to eligible participants, as defined in the 2008 Plan.

We have alsoAt December 31, 2019, the Company has 1 thousand options outstanding that were issued 48,000 options outside of the Stock Option Plans.

At December 31, 2016, 1,097,355 shares remain available for future awards under the 2011 Plan and 114,254 shares remain available for future awards under the 2008 Plan.
As of December 31, 2016,2019, no stock appreciation rights and 293,00012 thousand shares of restricted stock had been awarded under the Stock Option Plans.

On July 23, 2019, the Company issued 3 thousand stock options to each of its five non-employee directors. The options will vest in equal monthly installments over twelve months and have an exercise price of $4.50 per share. On January 2, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 20 thousand stock options to two executives, as discussed in Note 20. The options will vest in equal monthly installments over twelve months and have an exercise price of $5.53 per share and a grant date fair value of $4.45 per share.
A summary of employee and non-employee stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 for both continuing and discontinuing employees is as follows:


  Options Outstanding 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
  
Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding January 1, 2015 1,839
 $10.58
 8.49 $618
Granted 312
 9.77
    
Exercised (4) 5.37
    
Cancelled or expired (186) 9.69
    
Outstanding December 31, 2015 1,961
 $10.55
 7.68 $
Granted 417
 1.95
    
Cancelled or expired (180) 8.44
    
Outstanding December 31, 2016 2,198
 $9.09
 7.04 $
Exercisable, December 31, 2016 1,343
 $10.18
 6.13 $
  Options Outstanding 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  
Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding January 1, 2018 95
 $210.00
 6.96 $4
Granted 29
 25.20
    
Cancelled or expired (24) 142.20
    
Outstanding December 31, 2018 100
 173.10
 5.70 $
Granted 20
 5.89
    
Cancelled or expired (56) 182.37
    
Outstanding December 31, 2019 64
 $113.63
 7.48 $24
Exercisable, December 31, 2019 40
 $170.52
 6.63 $10

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair value of ourthe Company's common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options. No options were exercised duringDuring the yearyears ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we received $23,480 from the exercise of options.2019 and 2018, no options were exercised.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted to employees was $2,971,371,$177 thousand for continuing operations, which we expectthe Company expects to recognize over the next 2.32.18 years.
As of December 31, 2016, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted to non-employees was $19,500, which we expect to recognize over the next 1.0 years.
The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model for stock-based compensation expense requires usthe Company to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the fair value of our common stock, the expected term (the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of ourthe Company's common stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. We also estimateThe Company records forfeitures of unvested stock options. To the extent actual forfeitures differ from the estimates, the difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised.options when they occur. No compensation cost is recorded for options that do not vest. We useDue to significant changes in the Company's business, the Company used the simplified calculation of expected life described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, and volatility is based on an averagethe historical volatility of the historical volatilities of theCompany's common stock of three entities with characteristics similar to those of the Company.stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. We useThe Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero, as we doit does not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Expected forfeitures are assumed to be zero due to the plan design which has monthly vesting after an initial cliff vesting period.

The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted to continuing and discontinuing employees during the periods presented: 
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
Volatility 73.86% 60.69%
Risk free interest rate 1.25% 1.63%
Dividend yield 
 
Term (years) 5.93
 6.13
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period $1.26
 $5.54
In October 2013, we issued 10,000 options to a non-employee with an exercise price of $15.39. In May 2014, we issued 200,000 options to a Director, with an exercise price of $15.89. See Note 19 for additional information. The following table
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Volatility 93.86% 77.79%
Risk free interest rate 1.95% 2.88%
Dividend yield 
 
Term (years) 5.44
 6.45
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period $4.32
 $17.70

presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options reaching their measurement date for non-employees during the periods presented:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
Volatility 74.08% 70.38%
Risk free interest rate 1.64% 2.10%
Dividend yield 
 
Term (years) 7.76
 8.73
Restricted stock awards have been granted to employees, directors and consultants as compensation for services. At December 31, 2016,2019, there was $400,575 ofno unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted to employees; we expect to recognize the cost over 1.8 years.stock.

The following table summarizes the activities for ourthe Company's non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015:2018 for both continuing and discontinuing employees:


    Non-vested Restricted Stock Awards
    Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2015   133
 $8.14
Granted   48
 9.50
Vested   (47) 9.09
Forfeited/cancelled   (13) 9.03
Non-vested at December 31, 2015   121
 $8.25
Granted   18
 1.81
Vested   (57) 8.99
Forfeited/cancelled   (2) 9.02
Non-vested at December 31, 2016   80
 $6.30
    Non-vested Restricted Stock Awards
    Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2018   3
 $126.30
Vested   (1) 100.80
Forfeited/cancelled   (1) 203.10
Non-vested at December 31, 2018   1
 102.82
Vested   (1) 102.82
Non-vested at December 31, 2019   
 $

The TSA with Buyer described in Note 1 included the continued employment of individuals who will transfer to Buyer no later than six months from the closing of the transaction. Stock-based compensation related to these employees is included in discontinuing operations. The following table presents the effects of stock-based compensation related to stock option and restricted stock awards to employees and non-employees on ourthe Company's continuing operations included in its Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss during the periods presented (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
Cost of revenues $290
 $233
Research and development 172
 360
General and administrative 1,446
 2,106
Sales and marketing 108
 135
Total stock-based compensation $2,016
 $2,834
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Cost of revenues $16
 $16
General and administrative 247
 514
Total stock-based compensation related to continuing operations $263
 $530

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized $107 thousand and $391 thousand, respectively, of stock-based compensation related to discontinuing operations.


Note 13.15. Warrants
Prior to 2015, we issued certain warrants containing an exercise price adjustment (identified as Financing and Series B Pref. Stock under the heading “derivative” in the table below). For these warrants, in the event new equity instruments were issued at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrant, the exercise price would be adjusted to the new equity instruments issued (price adjustment feature). These warrants were initially recorded as a warrant liability, with any subsequent change in their fair value recognized in earnings until the warrants were exercised, amended or expired. At December 31, 2015, 60,200 of these warrants were outstanding. At December 31, 2016, all of these warrants had either been exercised or expired. During 2016 weand 2017, the Company issued warrants containing a contingent net cash settlement feature (identified as 2016 Offerings and 2017 Offering, respectively, under the heading “derivative” in the table below). These warrants are recorded as a warrant liability, and all subsequent changes in their fair value are recognized in earnings until they are exercised, amended or expired.
A significant During 2017, the Company also issued warrants that were subject to a 20% reduction if the Company achieved certain financial milestones as part of its debt refinancing in March 2017 (identified as 2017 Debt in the table below). These warrants were recorded as a warrant liability, and all subsequent changes in their fair value were recognized in earnings until April 2, 2018, when the number of our warrants are held by Mr. Pappajohn, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and stockholder. See Note 19 for additional details on these warrants.

On April 1, 2015, 19,138 warrants expired unexercised.

On November 12, 2015, the Company issued 3,000,000 warrants in conjunction with the 2015 Offering and an additional 450,000 warrants pursuant to the underwriter’s partial exercise of the over-allotment option. The warrants have an exercise price of $5.00 per share and will expire November 12, 2020. See Note 11. We have evaluated the terms and conditions of warrants issued with the 2015 Offering and determined the warrants should be included in equity and are not required to be reported as a liability.

On November 12, 2015, the exercise price of 75,215 warrants were adjusted from $10.00 per common share to $4.00 per common share due to 2015 Offering and the exercise price adjustment feature in certain warrants.

On November 18, 2015, 14,665 warrants expired unexercised and the Company received $1,400 from a warrant holder who exercised warrants to purchase 350 shares of common stock at $4.00issuable upon exercise of the warrants became fixed. On June 30, 2018, the 2017 Debt warrants were modified to adjust the exercise price from $84.60 per share to $27.60 per share.

On December 9, 2015, 120,000 warrants held by Mr. Pappajohn expired unexercised.

On February 21, 2016 and March 23, 2016, 200 and 70,000 warrants expired unexercised, respectively.

On May 25, 2016, we issued 1,357,301June 8, 2019, warrants to purchase 123 thousand shares of ourthe Company's common stock, referred to below as part of our May Offering. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants will be initially exercisable commencing six months from the issuance date at an exercise price equal to $2.25 per share of common stock. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date. These warrants contain a contingent net cash settlement feature and are part of the 2016 Offerings derivative warrants in the table below.2017 Offering, expired.

On June 30, 2016, 86,533 warrants held by Mr. Pappajohn expired unexercised.

On September 14, 2016, weIn January 2019, the Company issued 1,512,500 warrants to purchase shares31 thousand and 36 thousand shares of ourits common stock as part of our September Offering. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the warrants will be initially exercisable commencing six months from the issuance date at an exercise price equal to $2.25$7.43 and $7.59 per share, of common stock. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the initial exercise date. These warrants also contain a contingent net cash settlement feature and are part of the 2016respectively, in conjunction with its 2019 Offerings derivative warrantsdescribed in the table below.Note 1.

On December 1, 2016 and December 21, 2016, 37,000 and 75,294 warrants held by Mr. Pappajohn expired unexercised, respectively.



The following table summarizes the warrant activity for the years ending December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands except exercise price): 

Issued With / For Exercise
Price
 Warrants
Outstanding
January 1,
2015
 2015
Warrants
Issued
 2015 Offering Adjustments (B) 2015
Warrants
Expired
 Warrants
Outstanding
December 31,
2015
 2016
Warrants
Issued
 2016
Warrants
Expired
 Warrants
Outstanding
December 31,
2016
 Exercise
Price
 Warrants
Outstanding
January 1,
2018
 Transfer Between Derivative Warrants and Non-Derivative Warrants Warrants
Outstanding
December 31,
2018
 2019
Warrants
Issued
 2019
Warrants
Expired
 Warrants
Outstanding
December 31,
2019
Non-Derivative Warrants:                                
Financing $10.00
 243
 
 
 
 243
 
 
 243
 $300.00
 8
 
 8
 
 
 8
Financing 15.00
 436
 
 
 
 436
 
 (75) 361
 450.00
 9
 
 9
 
 
 9
Debt Guarantee 15.00
 353
 
 
 (120) 233
 
 (124) 109
Consulting 10.00
 29
 
 
 (19) 10
 
 (10) 
2015 Offering 5.00
 
 3,450
 
 
 3,450
 
 
 3,450
 150.00
 115
 
 115
 
 
 115
2017 Debt 27.60
A 
 15
 15
 
 
 15
2019 Offering 7.43
 
 
 
 31
 
 31
2019 Offering 7.59
 
 
 
 35
 
 35
 $6.42
D 1,061
 3,450
 
 (139) 4,372
 
 (209) 4,163
 115.54
C 132
 15
 147
 66
 
 213
Derivative Warrants:                                
Financing 4.00
A 
 
 60
 
 60
 
 (60) 
Financing 10.00
A 60
 
 (60) 
 
 
 
 
Series B Pref. Stock 4.00
A 
 
 15
 (15) 
 
 
 
Series B Pref. Stock 10.00
A 15
 
 (15) 
 
 
 
 
2016 Offerings 2.25
C 
 
 
 
 
 2,870
 
 2,870
 67.50
B 66
 
 66
 
 

 66
2017 Debt 27.60
A 15
 (15) 
 
 
 
2017 Offering 70.50
B 117
 
 117
 
 (117) 
2017 Offering 75.00
B 6
 
 6
 
 (6) 
 $2.25
D 75
 
 
 (15) 60
 2,870
 (60) 2,870
 67.50
C 204
 (15) 189
 
 (123) 66
 $4.72
D 1,136
 3,450
 
 (154) 4,432
 2,870
 (269) 7,033
 $104.18
C 336
 
 336
 66
 (123) 279
________________________
AThese warrants arewere subject to fair value accounting and contain anuntil the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants became fixed on April 2, 2018. Effective June 30, 2018, the exercise price adjustment feature.was reduced from $84.60 per share to $27.60 per share. See Note 14.16.
BOn November 12, 2015 the Company completed the 2015 Offering and the exercise price of certain derivative warrants were adjusted to $4.00.
CThese warrants are subject to fair value accounting and contain a contingent net cash settlement feature. See Note 14.16.
DCWeighted average exercise prices are as of December 31, 2016.2019.


Note 14.16. Fair Value of Warrants

The derivative warrants issued as part of the 2016 Offerings are valued using a probability-weighted Binomial model, while the derivative warrants issued as part of the 2017 Debt refinancing were valued using a Monte Carlo model. The derivative warrants issued in conjunction with the 2017 Offering were valued using a Black-Scholes model. The following tables summarize the assumptions used in computing the fair value of derivative warrants subject to fair value accounting at the date of issue at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, and the fair value of derivative warrants reclassified to equity during the years then ended.
  
Series B Exercised During the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Exercise Price $4.00
Expected life (years) 0.01
Expected volatility 12.33%
Risk-free interest rate 0.07%
Expected dividend yield 0.00%
 As of December 31, As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018
Financing 2015
Exercise Price $4.00
2016 Offerings As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018
Exercise price 
Expected life (years) 0.23
 2.08
 3.08
Expected volatility 70.82% 150.69% 100.51%
Risk-free interest rate 0.16% 1.58% 2.46%
Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

 Issued During the Year Ended December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2016 Reclassified to Equity During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
2016 Offerings 
Exercise Price $2.25
 2.25
2017 Debt Reclassified to Equity During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Exercise price 
Expected life (years) 5.50
 5.06
 5.97
Expected volatility 74.36% 72.82% 73.40%
Risk-free interest rate 1.30% 1.93% 2.55%
Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

  As of December 31, 2018
2017 Offering 
Exercise price $70.80
Expected life (years) 0.44
Expected volatility 172.5%
Risk-free interest rate 2.56%
Expected dividend yield 0.00%
The assumed ranges of Company stock pricesprice used in computing the warrant fair value for warrants issuedreclassified to equity during the year is as follows: in 2016, $1.35—$2.14; in 2015, $3.30—$11.76.2018 was $49.50. In determining the fair value of warrants issuedoutstanding at each reporting date, the assumed Company stock price was $1.35$5.96 and $3.30$7.20 (the closing price on the NASDAQ Capital Market) at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018, respectively.
The following table summarizes the derivative warrant activity subject to fair value accounting for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):

  Issued with 2016 Offerings Issued with
Series B
Preferred
Stock
 Issued For
Financing
 Total
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of January 1, 2015 
 8
 44
 52
Change in fair value of warrants 
 (8) (27) (35)
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2015 
 
 17
 17
Fair value of warrants issued 3,526
 
 
 3,526
Change in fair value of warrants (1,508) 
 (17) (1,525)
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2016 $2,018
 $
 $
 $2,018
  Issued with 2016 Offerings Issued with 2017 Debt Issued with 2017 Offering Total
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of January 1, 2018 $1,929
 $501
 $1,973
 $4,403
Fair value of warrants reclassified to equity 
 (423) 
 (423)
Change in fair value of warrants (1,704) (78) (1,950) (3,732)
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2018 225
 
 23
 248
Change in fair value of warrants (47) 
 (23) (70)
Fair value of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2019 $178
 $
 $
 $178

Note 15.17. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect ourthe Company's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, the Topic establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that give the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we havethe Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect ourthe Company's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands):
 
 2016 2019
 Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:        
Earn-Out from siParadigm $1,103
 $
 $
 $1,103
 $1,103
 $
 $
 $1,103
        
Liabilities:        
Warrant liability $2,018
 
 
 $2,018
 $178
 $
 $
 $178
Notes payable 114
 
 
 114
 16
 
 
 16
 $2,132
 
 
 $2,132
 $194
 $
 $
 $194
        
 2015
 Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Warrant liability $17
 
 
 $17
Notes payable 266
 
 
 266
 $283
 
 
 $283


  2018
  Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Liabilities:        
Warrant liability $248
 $
 $
 $248
Notes payable 20
 
 
 20
Other derivatives 86
 
 
 86
  $354
 $
 $
 $354
At December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, the warrant liability consists of stock warrants issued as part of the 2016 Offerings that contain contingent redemption features. At December 31, 2015,2018, the warrant liability consistsalso included warrants issued as part of stock warrants we issuedthe 2017 Offering that contain an exercise price adjustment feature.contained contingent redemption features until they expired in June 2019. In accordance with derivative accounting for warrants, wethe Company calculated the fair value of warrants and the assumptions used are described in Note 14,16, “Fair Value of Warrants.” Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the change in fair value of the warrant liability are included in other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a note payable to VenturEast from a prior acquisition. The valueultimate repayment of the Gentris contingent consideration was determined using a discounted cash flow of the expected payments required by the purchase agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2015 we recognized a gain of $207,000 due to settling the contingent consideration for $86,400.
The ultimate payment to VenturEastnote will be the value of 84,2783 thousand shares of common stock at the time of payment. The value of the note payable to VenturEast was determined using the fair value of ourthe Company's common stock less a discount for credit risk.at the reporting date. During the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, we2018, the Company recognized a gaingains of $152,000$4 thousand and $269,000,$136 thousand, respectively, due to the decreasechanges in value of the note.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the change in fair value of the Gentris contingent consideration are included in general and administrative expense, while realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the VenturEast note are included in other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss. In January 2020, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with VenturEast, which is described in Note 21.
A table summarizingAt December 31, 2019, the activityCompany had an earn-out receivable from siParadigm that is based on tests performed by siParadigm for the derivative warrant liability which is measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs is presentedCompany's former Clinical Business customers between July 5, 2019 and July 4, 2020, as discussed in Note 14. 1. The value of the earn-out is based on actual tests performed through December 31, 2019 and the Company's estimate of tests to be performed through the remainder of the earn-out period.
The following table summarizes the activity of the notes payable to VenturEast, the Earn-Out from siParadigm, and Gentris contingent considerationderivative warrants, which were measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (in thousands):
  Note Payable Gentris Contingent
  to VenturEast Consideration
Fair value at January 1, 2015 $535
 $293
Change in fair value (269) (207)
Settlement of liability 
 (86)
Fair value at December 31, 2015 $266
 $
Change in fair value (152) 
Fair value at December 31, 2016 $114
 $

Note 16. Acquisition of Response Genetics

On October 9, 2015, we acquired substantially all the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Response Genetics, with its principal place of business in California, in a transaction valued at approximately $12.9 million, comprised of $7.5 million in cash and 788,584 shares of the Company’s common stock, with the common stock being valued at $5.4 million.
Response Genetics was a life sciences company engaged in the research and development of clinical diagnostic tests for cancer. Response Genetics generated revenues primarily from sales of its ResponseDX® diagnostic tests, which Response Genetics launched in 2008, and by providing clinical trial testing services to pharmaceutical companies.

The transaction is being accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations in accordance with GAAP. Under this method, the total consideration transferred to consummate the acquisition is being allocated to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition. The acquisition method of accounting requires extensive use of estimates and judgments to allocate the consideration transferred to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of a trained workforce in place and expected synergies from new lines of business. Goodwill recorded in conjunction with the acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. Business transactions expense of approximately $890,000 incurred in connection with the acquisition was expensed as incurred.

The final allocation of the purchase price of the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of October 9, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):


 Amount
Accounts receivable$344
Prepaid expenses and other current assets561
Fixed assets2,254
Intangible assets1,246
Goodwill8,842
Current liabilities(194)
Obligations under capital lease(122)
Total purchase price$12,931

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 include the operations of Response Genetics from October 9, 2015 with revenues of approximately $1,751,000. The net loss of Response Genetics cannot be determined, as its operations were integrated with Cancer Genetics.

Note 17. Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability or disposition thereof is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
  Assets Liabilities
  Earn-Out      
  from Note Payable Warrant Other
  siParadigm to VenturEast Liability Derivatives
Fair value at January 1, 2018 $
 $156
 $4,403
 $
Change in fair value 
 (136) (3,732) 
Fair value of warrants reclassified to equity 
 
 (423) 
Fair value of certain default provisions 
 
 
 86
Fair value at December 31, 2018 
 20
 248
 86
Fair value at issuance 2,376
 
 
 
Receipts received during the period (338) 
 
 
Fair value of certain default provisions 
 
 
 
Change in fair value (935) (4) (70) (86)
Fair value at December 31, 2019 $1,103
 $16
 $178
 $

Note 18. Contingencies

On April 5, 2018 and April 12, 2018, purported stockholders of the Company filed nearly identical putative class action lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, against the Company, Panna L. Sharma, John A. Roberts, and Igor Gitelman,

captioned Ben Phetteplace v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-05612 and Ruo Fen Zhang v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-06353, respectively. The complaints alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 based on allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's business, operational, and financial results. The lawsuits sought, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in connection with purchases of the Company's stock between March 23, 2017 and April 2, 2018, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On August 28, 2018, the Court consolidated the two actions in one action captioned In re Cancer Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation (the “Securities Litigation”) and appointed shareholder Randy Clark as the lead plaintiff. On October 30, 2018, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, adding Edward Sitar as a defendant and seeking, among other things, compensatory damages in connection with purchases of CGI stock between March 10, 2016 and April 2, 2018. On December 31, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim. The Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss during the oral argument and on February 25, 2020, the Court issued a written order dismissing the case with prejudice. The Lead Plaintiff has not appealed the dismissal.

In addition, on June 1, 2018, September 20, 2018, and September 25, 2018, purported stockholders of the Company filed nearly identical derivative lawsuits on behalf of the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company (as a nominal defendant) and current and former members of the Company’s Board of Directors and current and former officers of the Company. The three cases are captioned: Bell v. Sharma et al., No. 2:18-cv-10009-CCC-MF, McNeece v. Pappajohn et al., No. 2:18-cv-14093, and Workman v. Pappajohn, et al., No. 2:18-cv-14259 (the “Derivative Litigation”). The complaints allege claims for breach of fiduciary duty, violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (premised upon alleged omissions in the Company’s 2017 proxy statement), and unjust enrichment, and allege that the individual defendants failed to implement and maintain adequate controls, which resulted in ineffective disclosure controls and procedures, and conspired to conceal this alleged failure. The lawsuits seek, among other things, damages and/or restitution to the Company, appropriate equitable relief to remedy the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On November 9, 2018, the Court in the Bell v. Sharma action entered a stipulation filed by the parties staying the Bell action until the Securities Litigation is dismissed, with prejudice, and all appeals have been exhausted; or the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Securities Litigation is denied in whole or in part; or either of the parties in the Bell action gives 30 days’ notice that they no longer consent to the stay. On December 10, 2018, the parties in the McNeece action filed a stipulation that is substantially identical to the Bell stipulation. On February 1, 2019, the Court in the Workman action granted a stipulation that is substantially identical to the Bell stipulation. On May 15, 2020, the plaintiff’s in the Workman action filed a notice of voluntary dismissal to the original action. The plaintiff’s in the McNeece action sent an identical notice that they intend to file a similar notice of voluntary dismissal to their original action.Based upon the above dismissal of the securities class action litigation, the Company anticipates the plaintiffs in the remaining derivative lawsuit may voluntarily dismiss their action as well. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the Derivative Litigation and therefore cannot estimate possible losses or ranges of losses, if any. The Company is expensing legal costs associated with the loss contingency as incurred.

Note 19. Joint Venture Agreement

In November 2011, wethe Company entered into an affiliation agreement with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”), subsequently amended. Under the agreement, wethe Company formed a joint venture with Mayo in May 2013 to focus on developing oncology diagnostic services and tests utilizing next generation sequencing. The joint venture is a limited liability company, with each party initially holding fifty percent of the issued and outstanding membership interests of the new entity (the “JV”). In exchange for ourits membership interest in the JV, wethe Company made an initial capital contribution of $1.0 million in October 2013. In addition, wethe Company issued 10,00010 thousand shares of ourits common stock to Mayo pursuant to ourthe affiliation agreement and recorded an expense of approximately $175,000. We$175 thousand. The Company also recorded additional expense of approximately $231,000$231 thousand during the fourth quarter of 2013 related to shares issued to Mayo in November of 2011 as the JV achieved certain performance milestones. In the third quarter of 2014 wethe Company made an additional $1.0 million capital contribution.

The agreement also requires aggregate total capital contributions by usthe Company of up to an additional $4.0 million. The timing of the remaining installments iswas subject to the JV's achievement of certain operational milestones agreed upon by the board of governors of the JV. In exchange for its membership interest, Mayo’s capital contribution will take the form of cash, staff, services, hardware and software resources, laboratory space and instrumentation, the fair market value of which will be approximately equal to $6.0 million. Mayo’s continued contribution will also be conditioned upon the JV’s achievement of certain milestones. During 2018, the Company received a cash distribution from the JV of $150 thousand. The JV was dissolved effective February 14, 2020, and the dissolution terms include an estimated final cash distribution from the JV to the Company of $89 thousand, to be paid as soon as practicable. The Company received the first payment of $36 thousand in April 2020, which is consistent with the dissolution terms.

The joint venture is considered a variable interest entity under ASC 810-10, but we arethe Company is not the primary beneficiary as we doit does not have the power to direct the activities of the joint venture that most significantly impact its performance. Our The Company's

evaluation of ability to impact performance is based on ourits equal board membership and voting rights and day to day management functions which are performed by the Mayo personnel.

Note 19.20. Related Party Transactions

John Pappajohn, a member of the Board of Directors and stockholder,The Company had personally guaranteed our revolving line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank through March 31, 2014. As consideration for his guarantee, as well as each of the eight extensions of this facility through March 31, 2014, Mr. Pappajohn received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,051,506 shares of common stock of which Mr. Pappajohn assigned warrants to purchase 284,000 shares of common stock to certain third parties. Through December 31, 2016, warrants to purchase 440,113 shares of common stock have been exercised by Mr. Pappajohn and 476,867 warrants to purchase common stock have expired. After adjustment pursuant to the terms of the warrants in conjunction with our IPO, the number of these warrants outstanding retained by Mr. Pappajohn was 108,778 at $15.00 per share on December 31, 2016.

In addition, John Pappajohn also had loaned us an aggregate of $6,750,000 (all of which was converted into 675,000 shares of common stock at the IPO price of $10.00 per share). In connection with these loans, Mr. Pappajohn received warrants to purchase

an aggregate of 202,630 shares of common stock. After adjustment pursuant to the terms of the warrants in conjunction with our IPO, the number of warrants outstanding was 360,785 at $15.00 per share at December 31, 2016.

Effective January 6, 2014, the board of directors appointed John Pappajohn to serve as the Chairman of the Board, a position previously held by Dr. Raju S.K. Chaganti. As compensation for serving as the Chairman of the Board, the Company will pay Mr. Pappajohn $100,000 per year and granted to Mr. Pappajohn 25,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock, and options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The options have a term of ten years from the date on which they were granted. The restricted stock and the options each vest in two equal installments on the one year anniversary and the two year anniversary of the date on which Mr. Pappajohn became the Chairman of the Board.

We have a consulting agreement with Equity Dynamics, Inc. (“EDI”), an entity controlled by John Pappajohn, the former Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective April 1, 2014 through August 31, 2018, pursuant to which EDI receivesreceived a monthly fee of $10,000. We$10 thousand. The Company expensed $120,000 annually$80 thousand for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152018 related to this agreement. At December 31, 20162019 and 2015, we owed EDI $50,0002018, the Company had accrued liabilities of $0 and $0, respectively.$70 thousand, respectively, for unpaid fees to EDI.

Pursuant to a consulting and advisory agreement that endedAt December 31, 2016, Dr. Chaganti received $5,000 per month for providing consulting2019 and technical support services. Total expenses for each2018, John Pappajohn had 18 thousand warrants outstanding to purchase shares of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $60,000. Pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, Dr. Chaganti received an option to purchase 200,000 shares of ourCompany's common stock at a purchaseweighted-average exercise price of $15.89$280.14 per share vesting over a period of four years. Total non-cash stock-based compensation recognized under this consulting agreement for the years ended December 31, 2016share.

Various executives, directors and 2015 was $37,625 and $239,375, respectively. Also pursuant to the consulting agreement, Dr. Chaganti assigned to us all rights to any inventions which he may invent during the course of rendering consulting services to us. In exchange for this assignment, if the USPTO issues a patent for an invention on which Dr. Chaganti is listedformer directors purchased shares as an inventor, we are required to pay Dr. Chaganti (i) a one-time payment of $50,000 and (ii)1% of any net revenues we receive from any licensed salespart of the invention. In February 2015, we paid Dr. Chaganti $150,000, which was recognized as an expense in 2014 when three additional patents were issued.

2019 Offerings at the public offering price. On November 12, 2015,January 14, 2019, John Pappajohn, ChairmanJohn Roberts, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Geoffrey Harris, a Director, purchased 33 thousand shares, 3 thousand shares and 3 thousand shares, respectively, at the public offering price of $6.75 per share. On January 31, 2019, John Pappajohn, John Roberts, Edmund Cannon, a Director, and M. Glenn Miles, the Board and Edward Sitar, our formerCompany's Chief Financial Officer, purchased 100,00033 thousand shares, 6 thousand shares, 1 thousand shares and 5,000,5 thousand shares, respectively, at the public offering price of shares$6.90 per share.

On July 23, 2019, the Company issued 3 thousand stock options to each of commonits five non-employee directors. The options will vest in equal monthly installments over the next twelve months and have an exercise price of $4.50 per share. The directors have waived their rights to any claim for past due director compensation of $263 thousand as a condition of these option grants.

On January 2, 2020, the Company issued 10 thousand stock options each to M. Glenn Miles and Ralf Brandt, the Company's President of Discovery & Early Development Services. The options will vest in equal monthly installments over twelve months and have an exercise price of $5.53 per share.

Note 21. Subsequent Events

Settlement Agreement with warrantsVenturEast

In January 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with VenturEast, discussed in Note 17, to purchase 100,000satisfy the Company’s outstanding liability, which resulted in the Company issuing 3 thousand restricted shares of common stock, and 5,000 sharesmaking two lump sum payments of common stock, respectively,$50 thousand each for a total cash settlement of $100 thousand.

Dissolution of Joint Venture

The Company dissolved its joint venture with Mayo in the 2015 Offering describedFebruary 2020, as discussed in Note 11.19, and the dissolution terms include an estimated final cash distribution from the JV to the Company of $89 thousand to be paid as soon as practicable. The Company received the first payment of $36 thousand in April 2020, which is consistent with dissolution terms.

Stock Option Grants

On May 25, 2016, Mr. Pappajohn purchased 317,820 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 158,910 shares of common stock inJanuary 2, 2020, the May Offering described in Note 11.

Note 20. Subsequent Events

On February 22, 2017, we sold $18,177,059 of gross State of New Jersey NOL's and $167,572 of state research and development tax credits, resulting in the receipt of approximately $950,000, net of expenses.

On March 22, 2017, we restructured our debt with SVB, by repaying the outstanding term loan, which was scheduled to mature in May 2017, and entered into a new two year asset-based revolving line of credit agreement. The new SVB credit facility provides for an asset-based line of credit (“ABL”) for an amount not to exceed the lesser of (a) $6.0 million or (b) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of 50% of the net collectable value of third party accounts receivable or three (3) times the average monthly collection amount of third party accounts receivable over the previous quarter. The ABL requires monthly interest payments at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.5% (5.5% at March 22, 2017) and matures on March 22, 2019. We paid to SVB a $30,000 commitment fee at closing and will pay a fee of 0.25% per year on the average unused portion of the ABL.

We concurrently entered into a new three year $6.0 million term loan agreement (“Term Note”) with Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”). The Term Note is an interest only loan with the full principal and any outstanding interest due at maturity on March 22, 2020. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of 11.5% per annum, with the possibility of reducing to 11.0% in 2018 based on achieving certain financial milestones set forth by PFG. We may prepay the Term Note in whole or part at any time without penalty. We paid PFG, a commitment fee of $120,000 at closing.

Both loan agreements require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum adjusted EBITDA and minimum revenue covenants, and restrict us from, among other things, paying cash dividends, incurring debt and entering into certain transactions without the prior consent of the lenders. Repayment of amounts borrowed under the new loan agreements may be accelerated if an event of default occurs, which includes, among other things, a violation of such financial covenants and negative covenants.


Our obligations to SVB under the ABL facility are secured by a first priority security interest on substantially all of our assets, and our obligations under the Term Note to PFG are secured by a second priority security interest subordinated to the SVB lien.

In connection with the Term Note, weCompany issued seven year warrants to the lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common20 thousand stock atoptions to two executives, as discussed in Note 20. The options will vest in equal monthly installments over twelve months and have an exercise price of $2.82$5.53 per share and a grant date fair value of $4.45 per share.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. In addition, as the Company is located in New Jersey, it is currently under a shelter-in-place mandate and many of its customers worldwide are similarly impacted. The numberglobal outbreak of sharesthe COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve, and the extent to which the COVID-19 may impact the Company's business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease. As a healthcare provider, the Company is still providing Discovery Services and has yet to experience a

slowdown in its project work, however, the future of many projects may be reduced by 20% subjectdelayed. The Company continues to us achieving certain financial milestones set forth by PFG.vigilantly monitor the situation with its primary focus on the health and safety of its employees and clients.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We
The Company evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of ourits principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourits disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as amended) as of December 31, 2016,2019, the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer have concluded that ourthe Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at December 31, 2016.2019. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usthe Company in the reports that we fileit files or submitsubmits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and were operating in an effective manner for the period covered by this report, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or the person performing similar functions as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
 
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of ourthe Company's management and directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because of declines in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. . In making this assessment, ourthe Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).

BasedIn connection with this assessment, the Company reports the material weakness, as described below, in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement for the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of the material weakness described below, and based on management’s assessment, as of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.not effective:

Accounting for foreign currency exchange rate: The Company’s accounting for foreign currency exchange rates requires that the Company make certain adjustments on its subsidiary ledgers to record certain transactions denominated in a foreign currency in transactions between its U.S. and Australian subsidiaries. Although management does perform overall review of its intercompany transactions between its foreign locations, the controls designed to identify material misstatements did not operate at a sufficient

level of precision to prevent or detect such errors in its determination of these transactions. Management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness at December 31, 2019.

Accounting for the Company’s investments: The Company’s accounting for the fair value of an investment accounted for under the cost method requires the Company to adjust the fair value of such investments if there is an observable price change in the investment. The Company recorded an increase in the fair value of an investment accounted for under the cost method based on an “observable price change,” however, the Company could not provide underlying supporting evidence of the price change during the 2019 audit procedures, and, therefore, had insufficient evidence to record an increase in the investment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Remediation plan and procedures: Management is committed to remediating the material weaknesses. The Company began the process of implementing changes to its internal control over financial reporting to remediate the control deficiencies that gave rise to the material weaknesses, including further improvements in processes and analyses that support the recording of foreign currency exchanges and the fair value of investments. In 2020, management plans to include additional journal entry review procedures to enhance its remediation efforts.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There
By December 31, 2019, the Company's clinical services business had been sold to siParadigm, LLC. The Company's previously noted material weakness over the accounting for uncollectible clinical services revenue was remediated with this transaction.

Other than the previously disclosed material weaknesses, specifically identified for 2018 and 2019 above, there were no changes in ourthe Company's internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information.

Credit FacilitiesNot applicable.

On March 22, 2017, we restructured our debt with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), by repaying the outstanding term loan, which was scheduled to mature in May 2017, and entered into a new two year asset-based revolving line of credit agreement. The new SVB credit facility provides for an asset-based line of credit (“the ABL”) in an amount not to exceed the lesser of (a) $6.0 million or (b) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of 50% of the net collectable value of third party accounts receivable or three (3) times the average monthly collection amount of third party accounts receivable over the previous quarter. The ABL requires monthly interest payments at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.5% (5.5% at March 22, 2017), an annual commitment fee of 0.25% and matures on March 22, 2019. We paid to SVB a $30,000 commitment fee at closing and will pay a fee of 0.25% per year on the average unused portion of the ABL.

We concurrently entered into a new three year $6.0 million term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”). The Term Loan is an interest only loan with the full principal and any outstanding interest due at maturity on March 22, 2020. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of 11.5% per annum, with the possibility of reducing to 11.0% in 2018 based on achieving certain financial milestones set forth by PFG. We may prepay the Term Loan in whole or part at any time without penalty. We paid PFG, a commitment fee of $120,000 at closing.

Both loan agreements require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum adjusted EBITDA and minimum revenue covenants, and restrict us from, among other things, paying cash dividends, incurring debt and entering into certain transactions without the prior consent of the lenders. Repayment of amounts borrowed under the new loan agreements may be accelerated if an event of default occurs, which includes, among other things, a violation of such financial covenants and negative covenants.

Our obligations to SVB under the ABL facility are secured by a first priority security interest on substantially all of our assets, and our obligations under the Term Loan to PFG are secured by a second priority security interest subordinated to the SVB lien.

In connection with such term loan, we issued seven year warrants to the lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.82 per share. The number of shares may be reduced by 20% subject to us achieving certain financial milestones set forth by PFG. The issuance of the warrants and the underlying warrant shares will be exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act or 1933.

The above description of the terms of the loan agreements and the warrant is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the loan agreements and warrant, which are being filed as Exhibits 10.81, 10.82 and 10.83 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein.

Dr. Shaknovich

Dr. Rita Shaknovich, our Medical Director and Vice President of Hematopathology Services since 2015, will change her status with the Company effective Monday March 27, 2017 from a full time employee to a part-time, independent consultant, so that she can return to academic research.  As a part-time consultant, she will continue to serve as our Group Medical Director, an executive officer position, and as the co-chair of our Clinical Advisory Board.  Dr. Shaknovich’s employment agreement will be terminated by mutual consent without severance, and as a consultant she will be compensated on an hourly basis for her services to the Company.​​


PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors

The following table sets forth certain information about the current directors of the Company. Directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.
Directors Age Year First
Became Director
Geoffrey Harris (Chairman of the Board) 58 2014
Edmund Cannon 75 2005
Raju S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D. 87 1999
Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D. 75 2012
Howard McLeod 54 2014

Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of the individuals currently serving as the Company's directors, based on information furnished to the Company by such individuals.

Geoffrey Harris

Geoffrey Harris is the chairman of the Company's Board and is a managing partner of c7 Advisors (a money management and healthcare advisory firm) since April 2014. From 2011 to 2014 he served as a managing director and co-head of the healthcare investment banking group at Cantor Fitzgerald, and from 2009-2011, he held a similar position at Gleacher & Company. Mr. Harris is also currently on the board of directors of Telemynd, Inc. (formerly known as MYnd Analytics), a data analysis company focused on improving mental health care; PointRight Inc., a privately-held software company; and MoleSafe, Inc., a privately-held company focused on the early detection of melanoma. Mr. Harris graduated from MIT’s Sloan School of Management with an MS in Finance Management.

Edmund Cannon

Edmund Cannon is a member of the Company's Board and is founder and President of the Clinical Research Center of Cape Cod since 2003, which specializes in finding institutional review board approved, consented specimens for the diagnostics and pharmaceutical industries, and in setting up studies to support FDA submissions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Previously, Mr. Cannon was a marketing and operations consultant for Franey Medical Labs. Mr. Cannon also formerly had the most national sales for Pharmacia Diagnostics Inc., and was a vice president and co-founder of Alletess, Inc. Mr. Canon has a degree from Boston State College and attended a Master’s program at Providence College.

Raju S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D., FACMG.

Dr. Chaganti is the Company's founder and has served on the Company's Board since the Company’s inception. Dr. Chaganti is an internationally recognized leader in cancer cytogenetics and molecular genetics. He is an inventor on 10 patents issued by the US patent office, 3 from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center KCC and 7 from Cancer Genetics, Inc, all related to cancer gene discovery and cancer genetic analysis. Dr. Chaganti was the incumbent of the William E. Snee Chair at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, where he was the faculty of the Department of Medicine and Cell Biology Program until he retired in July 2017, and is retired Emeritus Member and Professor. He is a Professor at the Gernster Sloan- Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and at Weill-Cornell Graduate School of Medicinal Sciences, New York, New York. He was the chief of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center’s cytogenetics service, which he established in 1976 as one of the earliest genetically based cancer diagnostic services in the country.

Dr. Chaganti received a Ph.D. in biology (genetics) from Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and completed his post-doctoral training at the Medical Research Council of Great Britain. Additionally, he completed a sabbatical in the Department of Tumor Biology at Karolinska Institute Stockholm, focusing on experimental murine tumorigenesis and immunology. He has published extensively in genetics with a bibliography of over 380 entries comprising peer reviewed research articles, book chapters, and books. Dr. Chaganti is American Board of Medical Genetics certified in medical genetics, with a subspecialty in clinical cytogenetics. He is also a Founding Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics.

Howard McLeod, Pharm.D.

Dr. McLeod is a member of the Company's Board and is the Medical Director, Precision Medicine for the Geriatric Oncology Consortium and a Professor at the USF Taneja College of Pharmacy. Until February 2020, he was Chair of the Department of Individualized Cancer Management and Medical Director of the DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute at the Moffitt Cancer Center and previously a Senior Member of the Moffitt Cancer Center’s Division of Population Sciences. He also chaired the Department of Individualized Cancer Management at Moffitt. He joined Moffitt Cancer Center in September 2013. Prior to joining the Moffitt Cancer Center, Dr. McLeod was a Founding Director of the University of North Carolina Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy since 2006. Dr. McLeod also held the prestigious title of Fred Eshelman Distinguished Professor at the UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy from 2006 to 2013. Dr. McLeod has published over 500 peer-reviewed papers on pharmacogenomics, applied therapeutics and clinical pharmacology. He had served as Chief Scientific Advisor and a member of the board of directors of Gentris Corporation before its acquisition by the Company in July 2014.

Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D.

Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D., is a member of the Company's Board and also serves as the Emeritus Edmond and Marion Guggenheim Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Emeritus Professor of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics at Mayo Medical School and the director of the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine. He has served in other positions of leadership at the Mayo Clinic since 1989, including on the Mayo Clinic Board of Trustees, from 1992 to 2009, and on the Mayo Clinic Board of Governors, from 1999 to 2006. He also previously held several other teaching positions at the Mayo Medical School since 1975. Dr. Prendergast has served for the National Institute of Health on numerous study section review groups; as a charter member of the Board of Advisors for the Division of Research Grants, now the Center for Scientific Review; the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council; and the Board of Scientific Advisors of the National Cancer Institute. He held a Presidential Commission for service on the National Cancer Advisory Board. Dr. Prendergast also has served in numerous other advisory roles for the National Institute of Health and the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, and he is a member of the board of directors of the Translational Genomics Research Institute and the Infectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI). Dr. Prendergast served on the board of directors of Eli Lilly & Co., and on its science and technology and public policy and compliance committees, from 1995 to 2017. He also served on the board of directors for DemeRx, Inc., a private, biotechnology drug development company from 2010 to 2012, and Ativa Medical Corporation, a private, diagnostic technology company from 2012 to 2015. Dr. Prendergast obtained his medical degree with honors from the University of West Indies and attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, earning an M.A. degree in physiology. He obtained his Ph.D. in Biochemistry at the University of Minnesota.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information about the current executive officers of the Company:

Executive OfficersAgePosition and Office
John A. Roberts61President and Chief Executive Officer
Ralf Brandt53President, Discovery & Early Development Sciences
Glenn Miles54Chief Financial Officer

Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of the individuals currently serving as the Company's executive officers, based on information furnished to the Company by such individuals.

John A. Roberts

On April 30, 2018, Mr. Roberts was appointed as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior to that, Mr. Roberts had been the Company's interim Chief Executive Officer since February 2, 2018. Mr. Roberts had previously served as the Company's Chief Operating Officer since July 11, 2016. Prior to joining us, from August 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, Mr. Roberts served as the Chief Financial Officer for VirMedica, Inc., an innovative technology solutions company that provides an end-to-end platform that enables specialty drug manufacturers and pharmacies to optimize product commercialization and management. Prior to VirMedica, from August 1, 2011 to July 31, 2015, Mr. Roberts was the Chief Financial and Administrative Officer for AdvantEdge Healthcare Solutions, a global healthcare analytics and services organization. Prior to that, Mr. Roberts was the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for InfoLogix, Inc., a publicly-traded healthcare-centric mobile software and solutions provider.

He has also held CFO roles at leading public medical device and healthcare services firms including Clarient, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of diagnostic laboratory services and Daou Systems, Inc., a publicly-traded healthcare IT software development and services firm. In addition, he has held key senior executive roles with MEDecision, Inc., HealthOnline, Inc. and the Center for Health Information. Mr. Roberts earned a Bachelor of Science and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Maine. He is a member of the Board of Directors and Immediate Past Chair for the Drug Information Association, a global neutral forum enabling drug developers and regulators access to education and collaboration. Mr. Roberts has also served on the Board of Directors of Cohere-Med Inc., a clinical analytics company, from February 2020 to present.

Ralf Brandt, PhD
Dr. Ralf Brandt, PhD was appointed as the Company's President of Discovery & Early Development Services following the Company's acquisition of vivoPharm Pty Ltd in August 2017. Dr. Brandt co-founded vivoPharm Pty Ltd in 2003 and served as its Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director until August 2017. Previously he was employed at research positions at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MD, USA and at Schering AG, Germany. He led the Tumour Biology program at Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland and established several transgenic mouse lines developing tumors under the control of oncogenes. He serves as a Member of the Scientific Advisory Board at Receptor Inc. in Toronto Canada. Dr. Brandt serves as a Member of Scientific Advisory Board at Propanc Health Group Corporation at Propanc Health Group Corporation. He received his Licence (BSc in Biochemistry and Animal Physiology) in 1986 and his PhD (in Biochemistry) in 1991 from the Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Glenn Miles
Mr. Miles was appointed as the Company's Chief Financial Officer in November 2018. Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Miles served the Company as a financial and accounting consultant since July 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Miles served as President and CFO of Catalytic Consulting LLC, a management advisory firm specializing in finance, accounting and operations, since 2015. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Miles conducted research and engaged in thought leadership and panel discussions, focusing on finance in the healthcare and non-profit industries. From 2009 to 2013, Mr. Miles served as the Biopharma Controller for Developed Europe, Latin America and US Oncology at Pfizer. Prior to joining Pfizer, Mr. Miles served as Vice President - Global Expense Control and Analysis - Non-Personnel Expense at Lehman Brothers from 2006 to 2008. Prior to joining Lehman Brothers, Mr. Miles served in various finance and accounting roles with increasing responsibility at AT&T Mobility (formerly Cingular Wireless and BellSouth Mobility) from 1994 to 2006. Early in his career, Mr. Miles worked as an accountant at Grant Thornton (and a regional subscriber firm, Aldridge, Borden & Company, P.C.) from 1987 to 1994. Mr. Miles holds an MBA from Mercer University and a Bachelor of Science from the University of Alabama in Accounting. Mr. Miles is trained in Lean Six Sigma (Green Belt), is a CPA, and a member of FEI, AICPA, ACHE & HFMA.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors and executive, officers, and persons who are beneficial owners of more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These persons are required by this item will be contained inSEC regulations to furnish the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual MeetingCompany with copies of Stockholders, which we anticipate will beall Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon the Company’s review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to the Company, the Company believes that all of its directors, executive officers and any other applicable stockholders timely filed no later than 120 days afterall reports required by Section 16(a) of the end of ourExchange Act during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019, except that Form 4s for each of Howard McLeod, Edmund Cannon, Raju Chaganti, Geoffrey Harris and Franklyn Prendergast (filed August 21, 2019) with respect to option grants that took place on July 23, 2019 were not timely filed, and except as indicated above were filed on August 19, 2019.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to its directors, officers and employees. The purpose of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is incorporated hereinto deter wrongdoing and to provide guidance to the Company’s directors, officers and employees to help them recognize and deal with ethical issues, to provide mechanisms to report unethical or illegal conduct and to contribute positively to the Company’s culture of honesty and accountability. The Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is publicly available on the Company's website at www.cancergenetics.com. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grants any waiver, including any implicit waiver from a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to its directors or executive officers, the Company will disclose the nature of such amendments or waiver on its website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

Audit Committee

The Board has established an Audit Committee currently consisting of Mr. Harris, Mr. Cannon and Dr. Prendergast. The Audit Committee’s primary functions are to oversee and review: the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and other financial information furnished by reference herein.the Company, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the Company’s systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the independent auditor’s engagement, qualifications, performance, compensation and independence, related party transactions, and compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the applicable rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Board has determined that each Audit Committee member has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the Committee. The Board determined that Mr. Harris is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and the applicable rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Company's Board has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which is available for viewing at www.cancergenetics.com.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Table
The information requiredfollowing table shows the compensation awarded to or earned by this item will be containedeach person serving as the Company’s principal executive officer during fiscal year 2019, the Company’s two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2019 and up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that such individuals were not serving as an executive officer as of December 31, 2019. The persons listed in the Proxy Statementfollowing table are referred to herein as the “named executive officers.”

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($) (1)
 Option
Awards
($) (1)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total ($)
John A. Roberts 2019 $267,885
(3)$
 $
 $
 $1,142
(4) $269,027
Chief Executive Officer and President (2) 2018 $331,154
 $
 $
 $220,754
 $1,188
(4) $553,096
Ralf Brandt 2019 $340,981
 $98,490
 $
 $
 $
  $439,471
President, Discovery & Early Development Services 2018 $330,000
 $
 $
 $92,964
 $
  $422,964
M. Glenn Miles 2019 $207,111
(6)$
 $
 $
 $
  $207,111
Chief Financial Officer (5) 2018 $247,266
 $
 $
 $20,992
 $
  $268,258
______________________
(1)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for grants made in 2019 and 2018 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This calculation does not give effect to any estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting, but assumes that the executive will perform the requisite service for the award to vest in full. The assumptions used in valuing options are described in Note 14 to the Company’s financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)John A. Roberts was hired as the Company's Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance and Secretary on July 11, 2016. He was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer effective February 2, 2018. He was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on April 30, 2018.
(3)Represents Mr. Robert's gross salary of $350,000 less reimbursements of $82,115 received from Interpace Biosciences, Inc. ("IDXG") pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement ("TSA") and the disposal of the Company's biopharma services business ("Biopharma Disposal") discussed in Note 1 to the Company's financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)Consists of group term life insurance benefits.
(5)M. Glenn Miles was appointed as the Company's Chief Financial Officer effective November 26, 2018. Mr. Miles’ salary for 2018 includes $224,189 in fees charged by his consulting firm, Catalytic Consulting, LLC, for Financial Leadership services from July 2018 until his employment as Chief Financial Officer. His compensation under the consulting arrangement had been based on a blended weekly / hourly rate.

(6)Represents Mr. Miles' gross salary of $300,000 less reimbursements of $92,889 received from IDXG pursuant to the TSA and the Biopharma Disposal discussed in Note 1 to the Company's financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Employment Agreements
The material terms of each named executive officer’s employment agreement or arrangement are described below.
John A. Roberts
The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Roberts effective as of July 11, 2016 (“Roberts Agreement”). The Roberts Agreement provides for, ouramong other things: (i) an annual base salary of $300,000, or such greater amount as may be determined by the Board, (ii) eligibility for an annual cash bonus of up to 35% of base salary, and (iii) the following post-termination benefits: (a) any performance bonus plan, then in effect, pro rata for his period of actual employment during the year, payable at the regular bonus payment time but only if other employees are then paid their bonus amounts, and continuation of medical/dental, disability and life benefits for a period of six months following termination of employment pursuant to certain events, and (b) monthly payments equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for a period of six months in the event his employment is terminated without “cause” or Mr. Roberts resigns for “good reason” not in connection with a “change of control”, (c) monthly payment equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for a period of twelve months in the event his employment is terminated due to illness, injury or disability or (d) a lump sum payment equal to twelve months of his then base salary plus an amount equal to the prior year bonus in the event his employment is terminated for any reason within twelve months following a change of control. The Roberts Agreement further provides that Mr. Roberts will not engage in competitive activity for a period of twelve months following termination of employment. The Roberts Agreement has an initial term of July 11, 2016 through July 10, 2017, Annual Meetingand automatically renews for additional one-year terms.
On May 10, 2018, the Board of Stockholders, which we anticipateDirectors increased Mr. Roberts’ salary to $350,000 per year and approved an award of 11,666 options to purchase common stock to Mr. Roberts, with the vesting of such options subject to satisfaction of certain performance conditions consistent with the Company’s current business plan and time vesting.
Ralf Brandt
The Company entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Brandt effective as of August 15, 2017 (“Brandt Agreement”). The Brandt Agreement provides for, among other things: (i) an annual base salary of $330,000, (ii) eligibility for an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of base salary, (iii) a one-time grant of a stock option to purchase 3,333 shares of common stock, vesting in equal quarterly increments over a two-year period beginning October 1, 2017, (iv) a one-time grant of 1,000 shares of restricted stock, vesting in equal annual increments over a three-year period beginning October 1, 2017, and the following post-termination benefits: (a) any bonus earned under any performance bonus plan then in effect, pro rata for his period of actual employment during the year, payable at the regular bonus payment time but only if other employees are then paid their bonus amounts, (b) monthly payments equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for a period of for three months in the event of his death or resignation other than for “good reason”, (c) monthly payment equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for a period of four months in the event his employment is terminated due to illness, injury or disability, (d) monthly payments equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for the greater of six months or the remainder of his initial two-year employment period in the event his employment is terminated without “cause” or Dr. Brandt resigns for “good reason” not in connection with a “change of control”, (e) a lump sum payment equal to his base salary immediately prior to such termination for the greater of six months or the remainder of his initial two-year employment period in the event his employment is terminated for any reason within twelve months following a “change of control”. The Brandt Agreement further provides that Dr. Brandt will be filed no laternot engage in competitive activity for a period lasting the greater of six months or the remainder of his initial two-year employment period. The Brandt Agreement has an initial term of August 15, 2017 to August 14, 2019, and automatically renews for additional one-year terms.
Glenn Miles
The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Miles effective as of November 26, 2018 (“Miles Agreement”). The Miles Agreement provides for, among other things: (i) an annual base salary of $300,000, (ii) eligibility for an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of base salary, (iii) a one-time grant of a stock option to purchase 3,333 shares of common stock, vesting in equal monthly increments over a two-year period beginning November 26, 2019 and (iv) in the event the Company terminates Mr. Miles’ employment at its option, other than 120 days after the enddue to any failure to substantially perform duties, 6 months of our fiscal year endedseverance or separation pay.

The Miles Agreement has an initial term of November 26, 2018 to November 26, 2019, and automatically renews for additional one-year terms.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth certain information, on an award-by-award basis, concerning unexercised options to purchase common stock, restricted shares of common stock and common stock that has not yet vested for each named executive officer and outstanding as of December 31, 2019.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END - 2019
  Option Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
John A. Roberts 3,333
(1) 667
(1) $60.00
 7/11/2026
  708
(2) 292
(2) $75.00
 2/22/2027
           
Ralf Brandt 3,333
(3) 
(3) $93.00
 8/15/2027
  1,583
(4) 3,417
(4) $26.70
 5/10/2028
           
M. Glenn Miles 722
(5) 2,611
(5) $9.00
 11/26/2028
______________________
(1)83 options vested on July 11, 2016. The remaining options vest in 15 equal quarterly installments of 250 options commencing October 11, 2016 and 167 options vesting on July 11, 2020.
(2)Options vest in 48 equal monthly installments of 21 options commencing one month after the grant date.
(3)Options vest in 8 equal quarterly installments of 417 options, commencing on October 1, 2017.
(4)20% of the options vest one year after the grant date, with the remaining options vesting in equal monthly installments of 83 over the next 48 months.
(5)20% of the options vest one year after the grant date, with the remaining options vesting in equal monthly installments of 56 over the next 48 months.

Director Compensation
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
In July 2019, the Company amended its director compensation policy. The Company's amended director compensation policy provides for the following cash compensation to its non-employee directors:

each non-employee director receives a monthly retainer fee, paid in advance, of $2,500;
the Company's chairman of the board receives an additional monthly retainer fee of $2,500;
the chairman of the Company's audit committee receives a monthly retainer fee of $1,000;
other audit committee members and compensation committee members receive a quarterly retainer fee of $1,000; and
each non-employee director receives a meeting fee of $250 for each teleconference or $750 for each in-person meeting (exclusive of all travel related reimbursement).

This policy provides for the following equity compensation to the Company's non-employee directors:

each non-employee director receives a one-time 3,333 share stock option at fair market value on the date of grant, vesting monthly in 12 equal installments over 12 months.
On July 23, 2019, in connection with the adoption of the amended director compensation policy, the Company granted each non-employee director options to purchase 3,333 shares of common stock.
The Company also reimburses non-employee directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.

Except as set forth in the table below, the non-employee directors did not receive any cash or equity compensation during 2019:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
            
Name Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash ($)
 Stock
Awards
($) (1)
 Option
Awards
($) (1)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total ($)
Geoffrey Harris (2) $36,750
 $
 $10,773
 $
  $47,523
Edmund Cannon (3) $19,750
 $
 $10,773
 $
  $30,523
Raju S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D. (4) $15,250
 $
 $10,773
 $
  $26,023
Howard McLeod (4) $17,250
 $
 $10,773
 $
  $28,023
Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D. (3) $19,500
 $
 $10,773
 $
  $30,273
______________________
(1)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for grants made in 2019 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This calculation does not give effect to any estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting, but assumes that the executive will perform the requisite service for the award to vest in full. The assumptions used in valuing options are described in Note 14 to the Company’s financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)Excludes $33,750 of past due compensation for the period October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 that was waived in July 2019.
(3)Excludes $30,000 of past due compensation for the period October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 that was waived in July 2019.
(4)Excludes $22,500 of past due compensation for the period October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 that was waived in July 2019.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is incorporated by reference herein.currently composed of the following two non-employee directors: Mr. Cannon and Dr. Prendergast. None of these Compensation Committee members was an officer or employee of the Company during the year. No Compensation Committee interlocks between the Company and another entity existed.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information requiredas of April 23, 2020 with respect to the beneficial ownership of common stock of the Company by this item will be containedthe following: (i) each of the Company’s current directors; (ii) each of the named executive officers; (iii) all of the current executive officers and directors as a group; and (iv) each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.
For purposes of the following table, beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the applicable SEC rules and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Except as otherwise noted in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meetingfootnotes to the table, the Company believes that each person or entity named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Stockholders, which we anticipate will be filed no later than 120the Company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by that person or entity (or shares such power with his or her spouse). Under the SEC’s rules, shares of the Company’s common stock issuable under options that are exercisable on or within 60 days after April 23, 2020 (“Presently Exercisable Options”) are deemed outstanding and therefore included in the endnumber of our fiscal year endedshares reported as beneficially owned by a person or entity named in the table and are used to compute the percentage of the common stock beneficially owned by that person or entity. These shares are not, however, deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the common stock beneficially owned by any other person or entity.
The percentage of the common stock beneficially owned by each person or entity named in the following table is based on 2,107,598 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of April 23, 2020 plus any shares issuable upon exercise of Presently Exercisable Options held by such person or entity.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner* Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
 Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned
Named Executive Officers, Executive Officers and Directors:     
Raju S.K. Chaganti, Ph.D. 23,990
(1) 1.1%
Edmund Cannon 6,672
(2) **
Dr. Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D. 5,293
(3) **
Geoffrey Harris 8,359
(4) **
Howard McLeod 4,560
(4) **
John A. Roberts 14,565
(5) **
Ralf Brandt 66,304
(6) 3.1%
M. Glenn Miles 10,166
(7) **
All current executive officers and directors as a group (8 persons) 139,909
  6.5%
      
5% Holders     
Renaissance Technologies, LLC 168,032
(8) 8.0%
______________________
(*)
Unless otherwise indicated, the address is c/o Cancer Genetics, Inc., 201 Route 17 North, 2nd Floor, Rutherford, New Jersey, 07070.
(**)Less than 1%.
(1)Includes 11,811 shares of common stock underlying options held by Dr. Raju Chaganti exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Also, includes 2,000 shares of common stock owned by Chaganti LLC, 3,260 shares of common stock owned by his wife, Dr. Seeta Chaganti, and 2,783 shares of common stock held by grantor retained annuity trusts of which Dr. Raju Chaganti and his wife are co-trustees and/or recipients. Excludes 555 shares of common stock underlying options held by Dr. Raju Chaganti not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(2)Includes 4,611 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 555 shares of common stock underlying options not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(3)Includes 4,877 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 555 shares of common stock underlying options not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.    
(4)Includes 4,111 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 555 shares of common stock underlying options not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(5)Includes 4,645 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 354 shares of common stock underlying options not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(6)Includes 55,722 shares of common stock owned through the Brandt Family Trust. Includes 9,582 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 8,750 shares of common stock underlying options that are not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(7)Includes 5,166 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before June 21, 2020. Excludes 8,167 shares of common stock underlying options not exercisable on or before June 21, 2020.
(8)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, consists of 168,032 shares of common stock held by Renaissance Technologies, LLC, under its holding company Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation. The principal business address of the beneficial owners is 800 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20162019 regarding shares of the Company's common stock that may be issued under the Company's existing equity compensation plans, including its 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and is incorporated by reference herein.its 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) as well as shares issued outside of these plans.


  Equity Compensation Plan Information  
Plan Category 
(a)
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
and rights (1)
 
(b)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
and rights
 
(c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plan
(excluding securities
referenced in column (a))
  
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2) 63,160
 $110.09
 32,606
 (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (4) 1,200
 $300.00
 
   
Total 64,360
 $113.63
 32,606
  

(1)Does not include any restricted stock as such shares are already reflected in the Company's outstanding shares.
(2)Consists of the 2008 Plan and the 2011 Plan.
(3)Includes securities available for future issuance under the 2011 Plan. Effective April 9, 2018, the Company is no longer able to issue options from the 2008 Plan.
(4)These options were issued to one of the Company's current board members in connection with consulting services.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this item
Other than compensation arrangements for named executive officers and directors, the Company describes below each transaction and series of similar transactions, since the beginning of fiscal year 2019, to which the Company were a party or will be containeda party, in which:

the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of the smaller reporting company’s total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years; and
any of the Company's directors, nominees for director, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of the Company's common stock, or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Compensation arrangements for the Company's named executive officers and directors are described in the Proxy Statementsection entitled “Executive Compensation”.

2019 Offerings
On January 9, 2019, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“H.C. Wainwright”), relating to an underwritten public offering of 445 thousand shares of its common stock for our 2017 Annual Meeting$6.75 per share. The Company received proceeds from the offering of Stockholders,$2.4 million, net of expenses and discounts of $563 thousand. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 31 thousand shares of common stock to H.C. Wainwright in connection with this offering. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the date of issuance at a per share price of $7.43. John Pappajohn, John Roberts, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Geoffrey Harris, a Director, purchased 33 thousand shares, 3 thousand shares and 3 thousand shares, respectively, at the public offering price of $6.75 per share.
On January 26, 2019, the Company issued 507 thousand shares of common stock at a public offering price of $6.90 per share. The Company received proceeds from the offering of $3.0 million, net of expenses and discounts of $525 thousand. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 36 thousand shares of common stock to the underwriter, H.C. Wainwright, in connection with this offering. The warrants are exercisable for five years from the date of issuance at a per share price of $7.59. John Pappajohn, John Roberts, Edmund Cannon, a Director, and M. Glenn Miles, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, purchased 33 thousand shares, 6 thousand shares, 1 thousand shares and 5 thousand shares, respectively, at the public offering price of $6.90 per share.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and executive officers. These agreements will require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding

against them as to which we anticipate willthey could be filedindemnified. The Company also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with its future directors and executive officers.
Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
The Company adopted a policy that its executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of the Company's common stock, any members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons and any firms, corporations or other entities in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest (collectively, “related parties”) are not permitted to enter into a transaction with the Company without the prior consent of the Company's board of directors acting through the audit committee or, in certain circumstances, the chairman of the audit committee. Any request for the Company to enter into a transaction with a related party, in which such related party would have a direct or indirect interest in the transaction, must first be presented to the Company's audit committee, or in certain circumstances the chairman of the Company's audit committee, for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting any such proposal, the Company's audit committee is to consider the material facts of the transaction, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no laterless favorable than 120 days afterterms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the endsame or similar circumstances, the extent of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016the benefits to us, the availability of other sources of comparable products or services and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.

Director Independence

The Company is incorporatedcurrently managed by reference herein.a five-member board of directors. All of the Company’s current directors are “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The informationfollowing table summarizes the fees for professional services rendered by Marcum LLP (second quarter of 2019 and forward) and RSM US LLP (2018 through first quarter of 2019), the Company's independent registered public accounting firms, for each of the respective last two fiscal years:

Fee Category 2019 2018
Audit Fees $597,764
 $500,535
Audit-Related Fees 85,225
 8,200
Tax Fees 63,000
 14,700
Total Fees $745,989
 $523,435
     
Audit Fees
Represents fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and reviews of the Company’s quarterly interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees

Fees related to review of registration statements, acquisition due diligence and statutory audits.

Tax Fees

Tax fees are associated with tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning and tax preparation services.

The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all auditing services and the terms thereof and non-audit services (other than non-audit services prohibited under Section 10A(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or the applicable rules of the SEC or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) to be provided to the Company by the independent auditor. However, the pre-approval requirement may be waived with respect to the provision of non-audit services for the Company if the “de minimis” provisions of Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act are satisfied.


The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees, and all other fees as described above is compatible with maintaining RSM US LLP and Marcum, LLP's independence and has determined that such services for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were compatible. All such services were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act to the extent that rule was applicable.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing the audit financial statements with management, discussing with the independent registered public accountants the matters required by this item willPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301 Communications with Audit Committees, receiving written disclosures from the independent registered public accountants required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussing with the independent registered public accountants their independence, and recommending to the Board that the audit financial statements be containedincluded in the Proxy Statement for our 2017Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we anticipate will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and is incorporated by reference herein.

Report on Form 10-K.

PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements. The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) Exhibits. Reference is made to the Exhibit Index. The exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this annual report on Form 10-K and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.

None.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
       
    
Cancer Genetics, Inc.
(Registrant)
    
Date: March 23, 2017/s/ Panna L. Sharma
Panna L. Sharma
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
duly authorized signatory)
Date: March 23, 2017May 29, 2020     /s/ John A. Roberts
      John A. Roberts
      
President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer and
Executive Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)Executive Officer and duly authorized signatory)
    
Date: March 23, 2017May 29, 2020     /s/ Igor GitelmanM. Glenn Miles
      Igor GitelmanM. Glenn Miles
      
Chief AccountingFinancial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Panna Sharma and John A. Roberts and M. Glenn Miles, and each of them, his true and lawful agent, proxy and attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to (i) act on, sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission any and all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K together with all schedules and exhibits thereto, (ii) act on, sign and file such certificates, instruments, agreements and other documents as may be necessary or appropriate in connection therewith and, (iii) take any and all actions which may be necessary or appropriate to be done, as fully for all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that such agent, proxy and attorney-in-fact or any of his substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this annual report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
     
Signature  Title Date
   
/s/ Panna L. SharmaPresident, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMarch 23, 2017
Panna L. Sharma(Principal Executive Officer)
     
/s/ John A. Roberts  President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
John A. Roberts (Principal FinancialExecutive Officer) 
     
/s/ Igor GitelmanM. Glenn Miles Chief AccountingFinancial Officer March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Igor GitelmanM. Glenn Miles (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ John PappajohnGeoffrey Harris  Chairman of the Board of Directors March 23, 2017
John Pappajohn
/s/ Geoffrey HarrisDirectorMarch 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Geoffrey Harris    
   
/s/ Edmund Cannon Director March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Edmund Cannon    
     
/s/ Howard McLeod  Director March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Howard McLeod    
/s/ Michael J. WelshDirectorMarch 23, 2017
Michael J. Welsh
    
/s/ Raju S. K. Chaganti  Director March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Raju S. K. Chaganti, Ph.D.    
   
/s/ Franklyn G. Prendergast  Director March 23, 2017May 29, 2020
Franklyn G. Prendergast, M.D., Ph.D.    
   

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 

Exhibit
No.
  Description
  
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1  Third
  
3.2  
  
4.1  
  
4.2  Form of Short Form Cashless Exercise Warrant, filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.3Form of Medium Form Warrant, filed as Exhibit 4.10 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.4Form of Long Form Warrant, filed as Exhibit 4.11 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.5Form of Bridge Financing Warrant issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to John Pappajohn, NNJCA Capital, LLC, Pecora and Company and DAM Holdings, LLC, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.6Form of Modified Bridge Warrant issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to John Pappajohn and Mark Oman, filed as Exhibit 10.50 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.7
  
4.84.3 Asset Purchase Agreement, by and among Cancer Genetics, Inc., Gentris, LLC and Gentris Corporation, dated July 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
4.9
   
4.104.4 
   
4.114.5 
4.6
   
4.124.7 
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11

Exhibit
No.
Description
4.12
4.13
4.14*
4.15
   
10.1  
  
10.2  
  
10.3  
  
10.4  
  
10.5  Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Compensation Plan, dated May 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
10.6
  
10.710.6  
 †

Exhibit
No.
Description
  
10.8Medical Director Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Lan Wang, M.D., dated October 9, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
 
10.910.7  Consulting Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and R.S.K. Chaganti, dated September 15, 2010, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10Employment Agreement, between Panna Sharma and Cancer Genetics, Inc., effective as of April 1, 2010, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11Employment Agreement, between Jane Houldsworth El Naggar, Ph.D. and Cancer Genetics, Inc., effective as of January 1, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12
10.13Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated April 29, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14Security Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated April 29, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.22 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15First Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated July 7, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.16Second Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated March 30, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17Third Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated July 2, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference
10.18Fourth Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated October 21, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.19Fifth Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated July 29, 2010, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.20Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and DAM Holdings, LLC, dated March 23, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.28 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.21Inter-creditor Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc., John Pappajohn and DAM Holdings, LLC, dated March 23, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.22General Business Security Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and DAM Holdings, LLC, dated March 23, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.30 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.23Promissory Note, issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to DAM Holdings, LLC, dated March 23, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.31 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.24Sixth Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated June 6, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to Form S-1 filed on December 30, 2011 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.25Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among Cancer Genetics, Inc., John Pappajohn, Pecora and Company and NNJCA Capital, LLC dated February 13, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
No.
Description
   
10.2610.8  Form of Promissory Note issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to John Pappajohn, filed as Exhibit 10.34 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.27Form of Promissory Note issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to NNJCA Capital, LLC and Pecora and Company, filed as Exhibit 10.35 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.28Inter-Creditor Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc., John Pappajohn, DAM Holdings, LLC, Pecora and Company, NNJCA Capital, LLC and Equity Dynamics, Inc., dated February 13, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.37 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.29Seventh Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated February 15, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.38 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.30Amendment to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and DAM Holdings, LLC, dated March 9, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to Form S-1/A filed on March 13, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.31
  
10.3210.9  Consulting Agreement with Equity Dynamics, Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.38 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.33
  
10.3410.10  Letter of Credit from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated April 19, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.46 to Form S-1/A filed on April 30, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.35Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and John Pappajohn, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to Form S-1/A filed on May 7, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.36
  
10.3710.11  Restated Credit Agreement, between Mark Oman and John Pappajohn and Cancer Genetics, Inc., dated October 17, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.51 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.38Form of Restated Promissory Note issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to John Pappajohn and Mark Oman, filed as Exhibit 10.52 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.39
10.40Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Pecora, filed as Exhibit 10.55 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.41Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and NNJCA Capital, LLC, filed as Exhibit 10.56 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.42Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and DAM Holdings, Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.57 to Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.43Eighth Addendum to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated October 18, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.58 to Form S-1/A filed on November 16, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.44Credit Agreement between John Pappajohn and Cancer Genetics, Inc. dated December 4, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Form S-1/A filed on December 14, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
No.
Description
10.45Promissory Note issued by Cancer Genetics, Inc. to John Pappajohn dated December 4, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.60 to Form S-1/A filed on December 14, 2012 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
   
10.4610.12  
  
10.4710.13  Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and John Pappajohn dated February 11, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.63 to Form S-1/A filed on February 12, 2013 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.48Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and John Pappajohn (on behalf of his spouse) dated February 13, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.64 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2013 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.49Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and NNJCA Capital, LLC dated as of February 13, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.65 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2013 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.50Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and DAM Holdings, LLC dated February 13, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.66 to Form S-1/A filed on February 14, 2013 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.51Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and R.S.K. Chaganti, dated February 13, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.67 to Form S-1/A filed on March 4, 2013 (File No. 333-178836) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.52
  
10.5310.14  
  
10.5410.15  
  
10.5510.16  
  
10.5610.17  
  
10.57Letter Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Andrew L. Pecora, effective February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
 
10.58Consulting Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and R.S.K. Chaganti, dated February 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-k for the year ended December 31, 2013).
10.59Employment Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Edward J. Sitar, dated March 17, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
10.60Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated April 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.61Revolving Line of Credit Note, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated April 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.62Consulting Agreement, between Cancer Genetics Inc. and Equity Dynamics, dated November 6, 2014 and effective as of April 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).



Exhibit
No.
  Description
  
10.6310.18 Security Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated November 12, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.64First Amendment to Credit Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated November 12, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.65Loan and Security Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, dated May 7, 2015.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.66Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement By and Between Response Genetics, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, and Cancer Genetics., a Delaware Corporation, dated as of August 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2015).
10.67
10.68Employment Agreement between Dr. Shaknovich and Cancer Genetics, Inc., effective as of July 1, 2015.(incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2015).
10.69
Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement, dated July 15, 2015, by and between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 16, 2015).
   
10.7010.19 
   
10.7110.20 
   
10.7210.21 
   
10.7310.22 Consent and First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank, dated January 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.73 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 10, 2016).
10.74
   
10.7510.23 Engagement Letter between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Rothman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, dated as of May 19, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2016).
10.76
   
10.7710.24 
   
10.7810.25 
   
10.7910.26 Engagement Letter between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Rothman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, dated as of September 8, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2016).
10.80
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
   

10.81*
Exhibit
No.
  Amended and restated loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank dated as of March 22, 2017.Description
   
10.82*10.36 Loan
   
10.83*10.37 
   
10.84*10.38 Release,
   
21.1*10.39 
10.40
21.1
  
23.1* 
23.2*
  
24.1 
   
31.1* 
  
31.2* 
  
32.1** 
  
32.2** 
  
101* 
The following financial statements from this annual report on Form 10-K of Cancer Genetics, Inc. for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 2016,2019, filed on March 23, 2017,April 28, 2020, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*Filed herewith.
**Furnished herewith.
Indicates a management contract or compensation plan, contract or arrangement.


11396