UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from____________ to___________
Commission file number 000-29462
WORLD HEALTH ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
| Delaware | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
777 Flagler Dr, Suite 800
511 Avenue of the Americas #705
West Palm Beach, Florida
New York, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)
10011
(Zip Code)
Issuers telephone number:(212) 444 1019
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.0007 Per Share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o [ ] No þ
[X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o [ ] No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ [X] No o
[ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
[X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer | ||
| Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o [ ] No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stockcommon equity held by nonaffiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference towas approximately $12,569,644 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing bidsale price of its Common Stock as reported on the NQB Pink Sheets on March 11, 2011: $2,204,670 Needsreported for such date. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director, and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be conformed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of April 15, 2013, the Registrant had 19,789,407,996 outstanding shares of its common stock, $0.0007 par value.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o [ ] No þ
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
NonePlease see that the correct boxes are checked on the two previous pages.
PART I
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.’s, (f/k/a Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“APPI”)), (“we” “us” “our” the Companys“Company” or “WHEH”) audited financial statements and notes thereto and Item 6 included herein. In connection with, and because the Company desires to take advantage of, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by, or on its behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the CompanysCompany’s control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change.
These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or on the CompanysCompany’s behalf. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as "may"“may”, "anticipate"“anticipate”, "intend"“intend”, "could"“could”, "estimate"“estimate”, or "continue"“continue” or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
On January 16, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity of World Health Energy, Inc. (“WHE”), a Delaware corporation pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Securities Purchase Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the "Agreement"“Agreement”) dated as of January 9, 2007 by and among WHEH, WHE and the stockholders of WHE. Pursuant to the Agreement, APPI agreed to issue 55,000,000 shares of its common stock par value $0.0007 per share (the "Shares") to Edwin Zhao and David Miedzygorski, the soletwo stockholders of WHE as follows: (i) 5,000,000 Shares at Closing and (ii) 50,000,000 Shares within 3 days of the filing of an amendment to WHEH's Articles of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State to either (A) increase the Company's authorized Common Stock to at least 930,000,000 (a " Capitalization Increase ") or (B) to effectuate a reverse split of the Company's Common Stock (the " Reverse Split "). If the Company effects a Reverse Split prior to any Capitalization Increase, the Remaining Shares due Selling Stockholders shall be proportionately reduced to give effect to the Reverse Split.
In 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of GNE-India from GNE-Cyprus.GNE-Cyprus,a company partially owned and operated by a stockholder of the Company. This agreement callscalled for the Company to issue 18,000,000,00018,001,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In the fall ofDuring 2010, the Company issued 2,447,994,016 of these shares, with the remaining 15,553,005,984 shares to be issued once the Company increasesincreased its authorized from 4,500,000,000shares to some amount above 21,000,000,000.
Business of World Health Energy
WHE is aan emerging energy, developmental stage company, with limited operations to date. World Health Energy Inc. ("WHE") is an emerging energy company. The primary objective of the businessWHE is to produce and market high-quality, low-cost B100 biodiesel with a view towards creating energy independence. In addition to the production of biodiesel, the Company willplans to design and manufacture biodiesel production plants in varying capacities to meet the demand of the market,market; thereby, providing much needed complementary renewable energy solutions to the international biodiesel communities. The Company hopes to develop strategic alliances and partnerships with proposed leased and owned facilities and make resale arrangements with international energy suppliers. World Health EnergyWHE intends to align itself with strategic partners to service local and global distributors and corporations seeking lower rates, high quality biodiesel and biodiesel manufacturing plants. WHE intendsplants and to enter into cooperative agreements with farming communities and local governments.
WHE intends to establish biodiesel production operations and to acquire alliances, partnerships and joint ventures with other like mindedlike-minded parties interested in biodiesel technology. WHE also plans to offer leadership models, marketing support services and financial support to our acquired alliances, partnerships and joint ventures and to service them for fees and percentages of the operations.
WHE’s primary marketing objective will be to utilize existing, well-established distribution channels in each of the markets it enters, and train the local channel partners in the features and cost benefits of World Health Energy'sWHE’s products and services. The companyCompany will support this strategy with cooperative print marketing programs, web site information services, and direct sales efforts through resellers.
Biodiesel technology although used in Europe for twenty years is a pioneering technology in North America and Asia. World Health Energy'sWHE’s main competitors in the future may arise from the larger oil distribution operation companies (i.e. Exxon, Shell, PetroCanada,PetroCanada), and the new private companies that are also gearing to capitalize from the explosion of biodiesel growth. Most of these companies will have far greater capital resources than WHE. If we are to stay competitive, we must be able to offer the products on a cost competitive basis and provide superior customer service.
WHE has targeted a community in northwest Florida to introduce its first product. Further development of this operation will be first subject to entering into a long term land lease program, which will enable us to install our first bio-fuel facility.
WHE believes that it will require a minimum of $700,000 to commence commercial operations. Significant additional sums will be required to implement the WHE business plan. There is currently no existing commitment for any type of funding, nor can there be any assurance that funding will be available at any time in the future. Without adequate funding, it is unlikely that WHE will be able to commence commercial operations .
Our Products
The Company currently has no products that contain irritating preservatives and additives.
Employees
As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had a total of fivetwo employees, one of whom was full time, whilst the rest of whom wereother was part time..time. We also employed 1 consultanttwo consultants, as of December 31, 2011,2012, who waswere involved in business development and financing activities. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we have not entered into a collective bargaining agreement with any union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good. This paragraph needs to be updated,
Available Information
Information regarding the Company'sCompany’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports, are available to the public from the SEC's Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”)website at http://www.sec.gov as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any document that the Company files with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC'sSEC’s public reference room located at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.
Risk Factors
You should consider each of the following risk factors and any other information set forth in this Form 10-K and the other Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),SEC, including the Company’s financial statements and related notes, in evaluating the Company’s business and prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones that impact on the Company’s operations and business. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company, or that the Company currently considers immaterial, may also impair its business or operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company’s business and financial condition, results or prospects could be harmed.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY’S PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS
The Company lacks meaningful operating history and will require substantial capital if it is to be successful. We will require additional funds for our operations.
At December 31, 2011,2012, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $226,602.$361,295. We will require significant cash in order to implement any acquisitions. No assurances can be given that the Company will be able to obtain the necessary funding during this time to make any acquisitions. The inability to raise additional funds will have a material adverse affecteffect on the Company’s business, plan of operation and prospects. Acquisitions may be made with cash or our securities or a combination of cash and securities. To the extent that we require cash, we may have to borrow the funds or sell equity securities. The issuance of equity, if available, would result in dilution to our stockholders. We have no commitments from any financing source and we may not be able to raise any cash necessary to complete an acquisition. If we fail to make any acquisitions, our future growth may be limited. If we make any acquisitions, they may disrupt or have a negative impact on our business.
The terms on which we may raise additional capital may result in significant dilution and may impair our stock price. Because of our cash position, our stock price and our immediate cash requirements, it is difficult for us to raise capital for any acquisition. We cannot assure yoube assured that we will be able to get financing on any terms, and, if we are able to raise funds, it may be necessary for us to sell our securities at a price that is at a significant discount from the market price and on other terms which may be disadvantageous to us. In connection with any such financing, we may be required to provide registration rights to the investors and pay damages to the investor in the event that the registration statement is not filed or declared effective by specified dates. The price and terms of any financing which would be available to us could result in both the issuance of a significant number of shares and significant downward pressure on our stock price.
The Company’s officers and directors may have conflicts of interest in that they are and may become affiliated with other companies. In addition, the Company’s officers do not devote full time attention to the Company’s
The loss of key members of our senior management team could adversely affect the execution of our business strategy and our financial results.
We believe that the successful execution of our business strategy and our ability to build upon the restructuring we have undertaken depends on the continued employment of our CEO, Mr. Lieberman, and key employees from World Health.WHE. If Mr. Lieberman or any members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our financial results and our business could be materially adversely affected.
We have had little success with our current business operations and there can be no assurance that our new business venture will be successful.
We will continue to operate our current business until and unless we secure sufficient financing for World Health Energy. World Health EnergyWHE. As WHE is a developmental stage company. Therecompany, there can be no assurance that World Health EnergyWHE will be able to successfully implement its planned business model. While its officers have significant experience in the field, without proper financing and/or government grants, it is highly unlikely that World Health EnergyWHE will be able to implement its business plan.
In addition, WHE faces intense competition from larger, better capitalized companies
We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures in the absence of which, shareholdersstockholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
Recent Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or The NasdaqNASDAQ Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges and NasdaqNASDAQ are those that address board of directors'directors’ independence, audit committee oversight, and the adoption of a code of ethics. While our board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, we have not yet adopted any of these corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not yet listed on a national securities exchange or Nasdaq,NASDAQ, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, shareholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of audit, nominating and compensation committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.
Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws may delay or prevent take-over which may not be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which include when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt. In addition, certain provisions of the Florida Statutes also may be deemed to have certain anti-takeover effects, which include that control of shares acquired in excess of certain specified thresholds will not possess any voting rights unless these voting rights are approved by a majority of a corporation'scorporation’s disinterested stockholders. In addition, our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 2,500,0000 shares are issued and outstanding as of April 15, 2013, with such rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our board of directors, of which 0 (is this correct?) shares of Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding as of March15, 2012.directors. Our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. As a result, our board of directors can issue such stock to investors who support our management and give effective control of our business to our management.
We may be exposed to potential risks relating to our internal controls over financial reporting and our ability to have those controls attested to by our independent auditors.
Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock
The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock and has no plans to do so in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to retain earnings, if any, to develop and expand its business.
“Penny stock” rules may make buying or selling the common stock difficult and severely limit their market and liquidity.
Trading in the Company’s common stock is subject to certain regulations adopted by the SEC commonly known as the “Penny Stock Rules”. The Company’s common stock qualifies as penny stock and is covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell the Company’s common stock in the market.
The “Penny Stock” rulesStock Rules” govern how broker/dealers can deal with their clients and “penny stock”. For sales of the Company’s common stock, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination and receive from clients a written agreement prior to making a sale. The additional burdens imposed upon broker/dealers by the “penny stock” rules may discourage broker/dealers from effecting transactions in the Company’s common stock, which could severely limit its market price and liquidity. This could prevent investors from reselling Echo common stock and may cause the price of the common stock to decline.
Although publicly traded, the Company’s common stock has substantially less liquidity than the average trading market for a stock quoted on other national exchanges, and our price may fluctuate dramatically in the future.
Although the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the OTCQX, the trading market in the common stock has substantially less liquidity than the average trading market for companies quoted on other national stock exchanges. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Due to limited trading volume, the market price of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to the Company’s performance. General market price declines or overall market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.
On October 28, 2011, the National Securities Clearing Corporation exited positions in WHE common stock from the Continuous Net Settlement System (CNS). This “chill” on the common stock may hamper trading liquidity in WHE.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company’s current executive offices are at 777 Flagler Dr, Suite 800, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401.511 Avenue of the Americas #705, New York, NY 10011. The property consists of approximately 100 square feet of finished office space. We pay no rent or other fees for the use of the mailing address as these offices are used virtually full-time by other businesses of our shareholder. We believe that the foregoing space is adequate to meet our current needs and anticipate moving our offices during the next twelve (12) months if we are able to execute our business plan.
| 5 |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not involved currently in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations except as set forth below, nor is the Company aware of any pending or threatened litigation.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of our shareholders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, covered by this report.
PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
(a) Market Information. Information
Our common stock, par value $0.0007 per share (the "Common Stock"“Common Stock”) was trading on the OTC QB market under the symbol "WHEN"“WHEN”. Prior thereto, our stock was traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “APPI”. Our common stock is traded sporadically and no established liquid trading market currently exists therefore.
The following table represents the range of the high and low price for our Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board for each fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012 and 2011. These Quotations represent prices between dealers, may not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
| Year 2012 | High | Low | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.0026 | $ | 0.0009 | ||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 0.0016 | $ | 0.0003 | ||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 0.0008 | $ | 0.0001 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.0004 | $ | 0.0001 | ||||
| Year 2011 | High | Low | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.003 | $ | 0.0019 | ||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 0.0046 | $ | 0.0014 | ||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 0.0015 | $ | 0.0004 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.0028 | $ | 0.0005 | ||||
| Year 2010 | High | Low | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.005 | $ | 0.0012 | ||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 0.003 | $ | 0.0012 | ||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 0.002 | $ | 0.0013 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.006 | $ | 0.0013 | ||||
Transfer Agent
Our transfer agent is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 17 Battery Place, New York, NY 1000410004. Their telephone number is (212) 509-4000.
(b) Holders. Holders
As of December 31, 2011,2012, there were approximately fourfive hundred forty (440)(500) holders of record of our common stock, which excludes those shareholders holding stock in street name. Correct?
(c) Dividend Policy. Policy
We have not declared or paid cash dividends or made distributions in the past, and we do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends or make distributions in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain and reinvest future earnings, if any, to finance our operations.
(d) Equity Compensation Plans. In January 2007, we did authorize the issuance of up to 70,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to a Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the Company.
We currently have no equity compensation plans.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
In 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of GNE-India from GNE-Cyprus. This agreement callscalled for the Company to issue 18,000,000,00018,001,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In the fall ofDuring 2010, the Company issued 2,447,994,016 of these shares, with the remaining 15,552,005,98415,553,005,984 shares to be issued once the Company increases its authorized from 4,500,000,000shares to some amount above 21,000,000,000.
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and the accompanying notes appearing subsequently under the caption "Financial“Financial Statements."
This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements and from historical results of operations. Among the risks and uncertainties which could cause such a difference are those relating to our dependence upon certain key personnel, our ability to manage our growth, our success in implementing the business strategy, our success in arranging financing where required, and the risk of economic and market factors affecting us or our customers. Many of such risk factors are beyond the control of the Company and its management.
Management has not been satisfied with the results of its operations in the field of our current endeavors. Due to limited capital resources, it has not been able to properly promote or advertise its products. Moreover, even with increased brand awareness, competition in the field remains intense. As a result the Company is pursuing other business opportunities and has acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of World Health. Assuming the Company can raise sufficient finances, the Company will focus its attention on the operations on World Health. In the interim, it will continue with its current operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011were $0 as compared to $0 for the year endedDecember 31, 2010.
Operating Expenses and Charges
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 20112012 were $48,428,812 as$134,905 compared to $115,415for$111,539 for the year ended December 31, 2010.2011. This increase was primarily due to the impairment of goodwill during the year ($48,317,273)
We recorded a net operating loss for 20112012 of $48,428,812 as$134,905 compared to $115,415$111,539 for 2010.2011.
| 7 |
Net Income/Loss and Net Income/Loss Per Share
Our net income/loss and net income/loss per share was $48,428,812 loss and $0.01 for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to $115,415 income$134,905 and $0.00 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 20112012, we had current and total assets of $212$0 compared to current and total assets of $212 as compared to current assets of $0 and total assets of $48,317,273 as of December 31, 2010.2011. We had current liabilities of $226,602$361,295 as compared to $114,851.
At December 31, 2011,2012, we had working capital deficiency of $226,390$361,295 as compared with a working capital deficiency of $114,851$226,390 at December 31, 2010.
If we need to obtain capital, no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain this capital on acceptable terms, if at all. In such an event, this may have a materially adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. If the need arises, we may attempt to obtain funding through the use of various types of short term funding, loans or working capital financing arrangements from banks or financial institutions.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. We have stockholders equitydeficit of $226,390$361,295 and a working capital deficiency of $226,390$361,295 at December 31, 20112012 and net loss from operations of $48,428,812$134,905 and $115,415,$111,539, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010.2011. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates.Estimates The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates
Start-Up Costs. CostsCosts of start-up activities, including organization costs, are expensed as incurred, in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 98-5.
Net loss per shareThe Company has adopted FASBASC 260-10-50,Earnings Per Share, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic lossearnings per weighted average common share excludesincludes no dilution and is computed by dividing the net income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding duringfor the period. The Company applies StatementDiluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" (FAS 123).
Fair value of financial instruments. instrumentsThe carrying values of cash and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Financial Statement PresentationThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our financial statements have been examined to the extent indicated in their reports by Accell Audit & Compliance, P.A. and Hamilton, PC for the years ended December 31, 200102012 and 2009,2011, respectively, and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP and pursuant to Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and are included herein, on Page F-1 hereof in response to Part F/S of this Form 10-K.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Report of Independent | 11 | |||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-1 | |||
| F-2 | ||||
| Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit | F-3 | |||
| Consolidated Statements of | Cash Flows | F-4 | ||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-5 | |||
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited the adjustments described in Note 4 that were applied to the restate the 2011 and 2010 financial statements to correct an error. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the 2011 financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2011 or 2010 financial statements taken as a whole.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 5, the Company has incurred net losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception. These factors, and the need for additional financing in order for the Company to meet its business plans, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
| /s/ Accell Audit & Compliance, PA |
Tampa, Florida
April 15, 2013
4868 West Gandy Boulevard ● Tampa, Florida 33611 ● 813. 440.6380
| 10 |
Hamilton PC
2121 S. Oneida St., Suite 312
Denver, CO80224
P: (303) 548-8072
F: (888) 466-4216
ed@hamiltonpccpa.com
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.
West Palm Beach, Florida
We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments for the correction of the error described in Note 4, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc., as of December 31, 2011, and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2011.2011 (the 2011 financial statements before the effects of the adjustments described in Note 4 are not presented herein). These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, except for the error described in Note 4, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2011, and 2010, and the result of its operations and its cash flows for the two yearsyear in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the adjustments for the correction of the error described in Note 4 and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by Accell Audit & Compliance, P.A.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that World Health Energy Holdings, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, World Health Energy Holdings, Inc suffered recurring losses from operations which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management'sManagement’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 7. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Hamilton, PC
| /s/ Hamilton, PC |
Denver, Colorado
April 1, 2012
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSHEETS
| Restated | ||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | - | $ | 212 | ||||
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | ||||||||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 4,353 | 4,353 | ||||||
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | 4,353 | 4,353 | ||||||
| - | - | |||||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | - | $ | 212 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 76,453 | $ | 45,188 | ||||
| Due to related parties | 284,842 | 181,414 | ||||||
| 361,295 | 226,602 | |||||||
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | - | 21,600 | ||||||
| STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $0.0007 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; 2,500,000 issued and outstanding | 1,750 | 1,750 | ||||||
| Common stock, $0.0007 par value, 110,000,000,000 and 4,500,000,000 shares authorized and 19,789,407,996 and 4,257,994,016 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively | 13,852,585 | 2,965,481 | ||||||
| Additional paid in capital | 11,433,491 | 22,298,995 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (25,649,121 | ) | (25,514,216 | ) | ||||
| (361,295 | ) | (247,990 | ) | |||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | $ | - | $ | 212 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
| * | See Note 4 |
| F-1 |
December 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
| Cash | 212 | - | ||||||
| 212 | - | |||||||
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: | ||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 4,353 | 4,353 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation | 4,353 | 4,353 | ||||||
| - | - | |||||||
| OTHER ASSETS: | ||||||||
| Investments in affiliates | - | 331,335 | ||||||
| Due from affiliates | - | 155,938 | ||||||
| Goodwill | - | 47,830,000 | ||||||
| - | 48,317,273 | |||||||
| TOTAL ASSETS: | 212 | 48,317,273 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | 36,888 | 30,901 | ||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 8,300 | 8,300 | ||||||
| Related parties | 58,000 | 12,000 | ||||||
| Due to affiliates | 121,791 | 62,027 | ||||||
| Stockholder loans payable | 1,623 | 1,623 | ||||||
| 226,602 | 114,851 | |||||||
| EQUITY: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $0.0007 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; | ||||||||
| 5,000,000 issued and outstanding | 3,500 | 3,500 | ||||||
| Common stock, $0.0007 par value, authorized 4,500,000,000 shares; | ||||||||
| 4,257,994,016 issued and outstanding | 2,980,596 | 2,980,596 | ||||||
| Common shares remaining to be issued for acquisition | 41,352,783 | 41,352,783 | ||||||
| Additional paid in capital | 28,780,947 | 28,780,947 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (73,344,216 | ) | (24,915,404 | ) | ||||
| Total equity (deficit) | (226,390 | ) | 48,202,422 | |||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | 212 | 48,317,273 | ||||||
WORLD HEALTH ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| For the Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | Restated December 31, 2011 | |||||||
| REVENUE | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| COST OF SALES | - | - | ||||||
| GROSS MARGIN | - | - | ||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| General and administrative | 83,343 | 82,245 | ||||||
| Professional fees | 51,562 | 29,294 | ||||||
| Total expenses | 134,905 | 111,539 | ||||||
| NET LOSS | $ | 134,905 | $ | 111,539 | ||||
| LOSS PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
| NUMBER OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | 18,087,335,231 | 4,257,994,016 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
| * | See Note 4 |
| F-2 |
For the Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| REVENUE | - | - | ||||||
| COST OF SALES | - | - | ||||||
| GROSS MARGIN | - | - | ||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| General and administrative | 82,245 | 76,215 | ||||||
| Professional fees | 29,294 | 39,200 | ||||||
| Impairment of goodwill | 48,317,273 | - | ||||||
| Total expenses | 48,428,812 | 115,415 | ||||||
| LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | 48,428,812 | 115,415 | ||||||
| LOSS PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES | 0.01 | - | ||||||
| NUMBER OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | 4,257,994,016 | 2,427,028,629 | ||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT
| Number of | Number of | Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares- | Preferred | Shares- | Common | Paid-in | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred | Stock | Common | Stock | Capital | Deficit | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 | 2,500,000 | $ | 1,750 | 4,236,402,012 | $ | 2,965,481 | $ | 22,298,995 | $ | (25,402,677 | ) | $ | (136,451 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | (111,539 | ) | (111,539 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2011 | 2,500,000 | 1,750 | 4,236,402,012 | 2,965,481 | 22,298,995 | (25,514,216 | ) | (247,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for acquisition | - | - | 15,553,005,984 | 10,887,104 | (10,865,504 | ) | - | 21,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | (134,905 | ) | (134,905 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | 2,500,000 | $ | 1,750 | 19,789,407,996 | $ | 13,852,585 | $ | 11,433,491 | $ | (25,649,121 | ) | $ | (361,295 | ) | ||||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
| * | See Note 4 |
| F-3 |
Number of Shares | Common Stoke | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulate Deficit | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Beginning Balance, January 1, 2006 | 798,157,996 | 558,711 | 14,681,548 | (22,792,391 | ) | (7,552,132 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | 52,000,000 | 36,400 | 196,400 | 0 | 232,800 | |||||||||||||||
| Adjust to record transfer as stk based compensation | 0 | 0 | 7,072,005 | 0 | 7,072,005 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for cash | 25,000,000 | 17,500 | 32,500 | 0 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Net loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,575,613 | ) | (1,575,613 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2006 | 875,157,996 | 612,611 | 21,982,453 | (24,368,004 | ) | (1,772,940 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Shares issued for debt late payment penalty | 6,000,000 | 4,200 | 33,600 | 0 | 37,800 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for acquisition | 5,000,000 | 3,500 | 26,500 | 0 | 30,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | 51,000,000 | 35,700 | 234,000 | 0 | 269,700 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares deemed not yet issued but accrued to be issued | (57,157,996 | ) | (40,011 | ) | (113,285 | ) | 0 | (153,296 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | (835,204 | ) | (835,204 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2007 | 880,000,000 | 616,000 | 22,163,268 | (25,203,208 | ) | (2,420,440 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | (16,351 | ) | (16,351 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2008 | 880,000,000 | 616,000 | 22,163,268 | (25,219,559 | ) | (2,436,791 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Shares issued to settle accrued expenses | 85,000,000 | 59,500 | 25,500 | 0 | 85,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued to complete acquisition | 50,000,000 | 35,000 | 265,000 | 0 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued to settle A/P and expenses | 95,000,000 | 66,500 | 62,010 | 0 | 128,510 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued to settle lawsuit and A/P | 125,000,000 | 87,500 | 452,938 | 0 | 540,438 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares issued to settle accd salary, loans &expenses | 575,000,000 | 402,500 | 1,016,610 | 0 | 1,415,610 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 419,570 | 419,570 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2009 | 1,810,000,000 | 1,267,000 | 23,985,326 | (24,799,989 | ) | 452,337 | ||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for acquisition | 2,447,994,016 | 1,716,596 | 4,795,620 | 0 | 6,512,216 | |||||||||||||||
| Net loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | (115,415 | ) | (115,415 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Ending Balance, December 31, 2010 | 4,257,994,016 | 2,983,596 | 28,780,946 | (24,915,404 | ) | 6,849,138 | ||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | - | (48,428,812 | ) | (48,428,812 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Ending Balance, December 31, 2011 | 4,257,994,016 | 2,983,596 | 28,780,946 | (73,344,216 | ) | (41,579,674 | ) | |||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| For the Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | Restated December 31, 2011 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (134,905 | ) | $ | (111,539 | ) | ||
| Changes in: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 31,265 | 5,987 | ||||||
| Due to related parties | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||||||
| Net cash from operating activities | (79,640 | ) | (81,552 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Advances from related parties | 79,428 | 81,764 | ||||||
| Change in cash | (212 | ) | 212 | |||||
| Cash, beginning of year | 212 | - | ||||||
| Cash, end of year | $ | - | $ | 212 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
| * | See Note 4 |
| F-4 |
Consolidated | ||||||||
For the Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | (48,428,812 | ) | (115,415 | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net profit to net cash | ||||||||
provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill | 47,830,000 | |||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities | ||||||||
| Decrease in due from affiliates | 155,938 | 32,000 | ||||||
| Increase in accounts payable | 5,987 | 19,765 | ||||||
| Increase in related parties | 46,000 | - | ||||||
| Decrease in Investment in subsidiaries | 331,335 | - | ||||||
Net cash used for operating activities | (59,552 | ) | (63,650 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of fixed assets | - | - | ||||||
Net cash (used for) investing activities | - | - | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from loan from affiliate | 59,764 | 62,027 | ||||||
| Proceeds from stockholders loans | - | 1,623 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | - | 63,650 | ||||||
| (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | 212 | - | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | - | - | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 212 | - | ||||||
| Non-cash Financing Activities | ||||||||
| Common stock issued for acquisition | - | 6,509,216 | ||||||
NOTES TO THECONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Nature of Business
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc., ("WHEH" (“WHEH”), (f/k/a Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), and its majority owned subsidiaries, Amazing Nutritionals, Inc. ("Amazing") acquired in January 2004, and Mazal Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Mazal") acquired in December 2004. On June 6, 2005, WHEH entered into a stock exchange agreement with AKID Corporation ("AKID") to exchange 7,000,000 shares of Mazal's common stock held by APPI for 20,000,000 shares of AKID common stock. AKID also acquired 3,130,000 shares of Mazal's outstanding shares from the remaining Mazal stockholders in exchange for 6,180,000 shares of its common stock. In connection with the merger, Mazal became a wholly owned subsidiary, of AKID. Prior to the merger, AKID was a non-operating "shell" corporation. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the merger of a private operating company, Mazal Plant Pharmaceuticals,World Health Energy, Inc. into a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal net assets, AKID, is considered a capital transaction. At the time of the merger, the officers and directors of AKID resigned and were replaced with the officers and directors of Mazal. For Financial Statement presentation, the merger has been reflected in the Financial Statements as though it occurred on December 31, 2004. In October 2005, AKID filed a name change to Mazal Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. During 2006, as a result of the Company transferring shares of Mazal common stock to the Company's stockholders' in payment of debt, Mazal ceased to be a subsidiary. As a result of shares of stock issued by Amazing, the Company no longer holds a majority interest.
The Company’s corporate offices wereare located in New York City, and now are in West Palm Beach, Florida. In April 2008, the Company changed its name from Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to World Health Energy, Inc., pursuant to the January 2007 reorganization.
(2) Basis of Presentation
The accompanyingconsolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
(3) Significant Accounting Policies
a) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
b) Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2011 consolidated financial statement presentation have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation. The reclassifications have no impact on the total stockholders’ deficit.
c) Loss per share
The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Policies (continued)
d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2010.
e) Office Equipment and Depreciation
Office equipment is stated at cost and iswas depreciated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets which isof three years. Routine maintenance, repairs and replacement costs are expensed as incurred and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. When office equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in operations.
f) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeded the fair value of the assets.
g) Revenue Recognition
The Company has the authority to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0007 per share, which may be divided into series andrecognizes revenue on arrangements in accordance with the preferences, limitations and relative rights determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2011, 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock shares were issued and outstanding. The Company is authorized to issue 4,500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0007. As of December 31, 2011, 4,257,994,016 shares of common stock shares were issued and outstanding. At June 30, 2009, 880,000,000 shares were issued and outstanding. In April 2008, the Company increased the authorized common stock from 880,000,000 to 4,500,000,000, par value of $0.0007.
h) Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Additionally, the recognition of future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, is required to the Company's attorneyextent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in considerationthe years in which the assets and liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of accrued legal services,a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
In the event the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting bases and the Company authorized the issuance of 17,000,000 shares of its common stock under an S-8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission at $0.0047 per share for services rendered.
The Company income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities. Generally, the next several years, and continually evaluate new circumstances surrounding the future realizationstatute of such assets. The difference between income taxes and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax ratelimitations related to the loss beforeCompany’s federal and state income taxestax return is duethree years from the date of filing. The state impact of any federal changes for prior years remains subject to an increaseexamination for a period up to five years after formal notification to the states.
Management has evaluated tax positions in the deferredaccordance with FASB ASC 740,Income Taxes, and has not identified any significant tax asset valuation allowance. The valuation allowance at September 30, 2011 and 2010 is 100%.
i) Subsequent Events
In accordance with FASB ASC 855,Subsequent Events, the Company retained himevaluated subsequent events through April 15, 2013, the date the financial statements were available for issue.
(4) Prior Period Restatements
The Company restated its consolidated financial statements as a consultant. His current consultant's agreement dated June 10, 1999, providesof and for monthly consulting fees of $9,000, reimbursement of all direct expenses incurred while providing services to the Company, and a five year option to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. These options expired in June 2004. No shares of common stock were issued to this consultant for services in 2007 or 2006. During 2006, the Company transferred shares of Mazal and Amazon Biotech, Inc. ("Amazon") common stock held for investment to the consultant in payment in the amount of $207,900. The balance due the related party consultant at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $47,000 and $47,000, respectively. CJ Lieberman also entered into an employment agreement with Mazal. The agreement had a monthly base of $4,000 which was increased to $5,500 and has additional incentive clauses for payment in Mazal common stock and salary increases. The agreement expired December 10, 2006. Salary expense amounted to $10,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
During 2010, the Company originally valued Goodwill associated with the purchase of GNE-India at $47,830,000, with $1,716,596 and $4,795,620 being recorded in stockholders’ deficit as common stock and additional paid-in capital, respectively, for a consulting agreement with Dr. Bielory whereby under the termsnet capital transaction of $6,512,216. In addition, during 2010, $41,352,783 was recorded in stockholders’ deficit as common shares remaining to be issued for acquisition. According to the agreement, the Company is requiredreceived $25,000 in cash and intangible assets which management believes to pay Dr. Bielory certain monthly amounts, some contingenthave had no value on the Company achieving specifieddate of acquisition. The restated financial statements for 2010 have $1,713,596 and $(1,710,196) being recorded in stockholders’ deficit as common stock and additional paid-in capital, respectively, for a net profit levels. capital transaction of $3,400. In addition, the $41,352,783 recorded in stockholders’ deficit as common shares remaining to be issued for acquisition was restated to be $21,600 and shown on the balance sheet between liabilities and equity.
During 2004,2011, the Company paid down $20,000originally recorded an impairment of goodwill for $48,317,273, which included the Goodwill originally recorded on the acquisition of GNE-India of $47,830,000, as well as investments in affiliates of $331,335 and a due from affiliate balance of $155,938. Management has restated the 2011 financial statements to remove this impairment charge as the impairment of goodwill was no longer applicable. In addition, the affiliates associated with the other two balances were not viable entities as of December 31, 2010 and should have been impaired and written off as bad debt prior to 2011; therefore, management restated the 2010 consolidated financial statements to reflect an impairment change on the investment in affiliates of $331,335 and bad debt expense of $155,938.
The total impact on the December 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements was an increase of the liability duenet loss from $115,415 to Dr. Bielory by issuing 2,000,000 shares$602,688, a decrease in total assets from $48,317,273 to $0, a decrease of the common stock. Atstock remaining to be issued for acquisition from $41,352,783 to $21,600 shown as commitments and contingencies on the balance sheet, an increase in the accumulated deficit from $24,915,404 to $25,402,677 and a decrease in additional paid-in capital from $28,780,947 to $22,298,995. The total impact on the December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements was a decrease of the net loss from $48,428,812 to $111,539, a decrease of the common stock remaining to be issued for acquisition from $41,352,783 to $21,600 shown as commitments and 2010contingencies on the balance due was $0, which was settled bysheet, an decrease in the issuance of 26,700,084 shares of common stock.
(5) Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company'sCompany’s financial position and operating results raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern, as reflected by the net losslosses of approximately $73,344,216$25,649,121 accumulated through December 31, 2011.2012. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Management is presently seeking to raise permanent equity capital in the capital markets to eliminate negative working capital and provide working capital. Failure to raise equity capital or secure some other form of long-term debt arrangement will cause the Company to further increase its negative working capital deficit and could result in the Company having to curtail or cease operations. Additionally, even if the Company does raise sufficient capital to support its operating expenses and generate revenues, there can be no assurances that the revenue will be sufficient to enable it to develop business to a level where it will generate profits and cash flows from operations.
(6) Commitments and Contingencies
As of December 31, 2011, the Company maintainedhad $21,600 in unpaid consideration from the agreement with GNE-Cyprus described in Note 7. This consideration was to be paid in the form of shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2011, the Company did not have enough of its corporate officecommon stock authorized in New York pursuantorder to an operating lease which expired March 31, 2008 and called for monthly lease payments of $2,445 from April 2007 through March 2008, plus 35% ofissue the floors electricity cost and $100 per month May to September for air conditioning. remaining 15,553,005,984 common shares under the agreement.
(7) Stockholders’ Deficit
In 2010, the Company relocated its corporate office to West Palm Beach, FL, and subleases space on an informal month to month lease at a rate of $100 per month.
On December 27, 2011, the resultsCompany increased its number of the impairment evaluation indicated that the full amount of the $47,830,000 reported as goodwill should be considered impaired. Management considers the Company as a wholeauthorized common shares to be the reporting unit for the goodwill evaluation. A present value of cash flows model, using Level 3 (significant unobservable) market inputs was used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit
(8) Income Taxes
The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the provision for income taxes as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
| Income tax at federal statutory rate | (34.00 | )% | ||
| State tax, net of federal effect | (3.96 | )% | ||
| 37.96 | % | |||
| Valuation allowance | (37.96 | )% | ||
| Effective rate | 0.00 | % |
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s only significant deferred income tax asset was a cumulative estimated net tax operating loss of approximately $26 million that is available to completeoffset future taxable income, if any, in future periods, subject to expiration and other limitations imposed by the GNe India WHEN asset purchaseInternal Revenue Service. Management has considered the Company’s operating losses incurred to date and believes that a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets is required as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.
(9) Related Parties
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $1,623 included in Due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that is due to a stockholder. The amount is non-interest bearing and due upon demand.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $55,564 and $14,545, respectively, in Due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that is due to a stockholder for amounts paid to certain vendors for services rendered. The amounts are non-interest bearing and due upon demand.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $79,297 and $40,888, respectively, included in Due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that is due to a stockholder and consultant of the Company for services rendered as a business advisor and for amounts paid to certain vendors for services rendered. The amounts are non-interest bearing and due upon demand.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $52,000 and $28,000, respectively, included in Due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that is due to a stockholder and consultant of the Company for services rendered as the Chief Executive Officer or the Company. The amounts are non-interest bearing and due upon demand.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $96,358 included in Due to related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that is due to a stockholder. The amount is non-interest bearing and due upon demand.
The Company leases office space in Jerusalem, Israel from a stockholder who is also a consultant for the company. The lease is a month-to-month agreement of June 2010.for 4,822.
| F-9 |
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Management of the Company with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s Board of Directors, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2011.
(b)Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. It should be noted that the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that the Company’s internal controls will necessarily prevent all errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules if the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fourth quarter of 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
| 12 |
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(a) Set forth below are the names, ages, positions, with the Company and business experiences of the executive officers and directors of the Company.
| Name | Age | Position(s) with Company | ||
| President, CEO, Director | ||||
| CFO |
Business Experience
David Lieberman has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 1, 1996, and as a member of its Board of Directors since June 1996. Since 1991, he has worked in the offices of the Chief Rabbi of Bnai Brak, Israel. He also serves as a consultant for Osem Industries, Inc., an international food conglomerate located in Israel.
Jason Lurie has a degree in economics and business administrationpsychology from Hebrew University.The University of Michigan. Mr. KosmanLurie has a professional background,experience at both the start-up level as well as working forat Fortune 100 Company The Liberty Mutual Group. He served in the treasuryCombat Engineers Corps of the Israeli Ministry of Education and for the budget department of the City of Jerusalem.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We presently do not have an audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, an executive committee of our board of directors, stock plan committee or any other committees. However, our board of directors may establish various committees during the current fiscal year.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors receive no cash compensation.
Terms of Office
Our directors are appointed for one-year terms to hold office until the next annual general meeting of the holders of our Common Stock or until removed from office in accordance with our by-laws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by our board of directors.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
Except as indicated above, no event listed in Sub-paragraphs (1) through (4) of Subparagraph (d) of Item 401 of Regulation S-X, has occurred with respect to any of our present executive officers or directors or any nominee for director during the past five years which is material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of such director or officer. Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For companies registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were not complied with on a timely basis for the period which this report relates.
Code of Ethics
We adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We undertake to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.
Conflicts of Interest
None of our officers will devote more than a portion of his time to our affairs. There will be occasions when the time requirements of our business conflict with the demands of the officers other business and investment activities. Such conflicts may require that we attempt to employ additional personnel. There is no assurance that the services of such persons will be available or that they can be obtained upon terms favorable to us.
Our officers, directors and principal shareholders may actively negotiate for the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction, if any. In the event that such a transaction occurs, it is anticipated that a substantial premium may be paid by the purchaser in conjunction with any sale of shares by our officers, directors and principal shareholders made as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. The fact that a substantial premium may be paid to members of our management to acquire their shares creates a conflict of interest for them and may compromise their state law fiduciary duties to the our other shareholders. In making any such sale, members of Company management may consider their own personal pecuniary benefit rather than the best interests of the Company and the Company'sCompany’s other shareholders, and the other shareholders are not expected to be afforded the opportunity to approve or consent to any particular buy-out transaction involving shares held by members of Company management.
It is not currently anticipated that any salary, consulting fee, or finder’s fee shall be paid to any of our directors or executive officers, or to any other affiliate of us except as described under Executive Compensation below. Although management has no current plans to cause us to do so, it is possible that we may enter into an agreement with an acquisition candidate requiring the sale of all or a portion of the Common Stock held by our current stockholders to the
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table shows all the cash compensation paid by the Company, as well as certain other compensation paid or accrued, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 through 20112012 to the Company’s President and highest paid executive officers. No restricted stock awards, long-term incentive plan payouts or other types of compensation, other than compensation identified in the chart below, were paid to these executive officers during these fiscal years
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS
NAME AND YEAR SALARY BONUS OTHER RESTRICTED SECURITIEISSECURITIES LTIP ALL
POSITION ANNUAL STOCK AWARDS UNDERLYING PAYOUTS
COMPENSATION OPTIONS/SARS
D Liberman
| 2012 | $ | 24,000 | ||
| 2011 | $ | 24,000 | ||
| 2010 | $ | 10,000 |
Compensation of Directors
We have no standard arrangements for compensating our board of directors for their attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors.
Bonuses and Deferred Compensation
We do not have any bonus, deferred compensation or retirement plan. Such plans may be adopted by us at such time as deemed reasonable by our board of directors. We do not have a compensation committee,committee; all decisions regarding compensation are determined by our board of directors.
Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights.
We do not currently have a Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Rights Plan. No stock options or stock appreciation rights were awarded during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,2012, or the period ending on the date of this Report.
Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangement
There are no compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from us, with respect to any person named in cash compensation set out above which would in any way result in payments to any such person because of his resignation, retirement, or other termination of such person'sperson’s employment with us or our subsidiaries, or any change in control of us, or a change in the person'sperson’s responsibilities following a changing in control.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2011,2012, information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) persons known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares, (ii) each director, (iii) each executive officer and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Title of
Name and Address Class Number Percent (1)
David Lieberman Common 262,000,000 3.05255,000,000 1.28 %
CJ Lieberman Common 130,000,000 6.151,577,774,3157.97 %
Total Common 392,000,000 9.201,832,774,3159.26 %
(1) Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person'sperson’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on December 31, 2011.2012. As of December 31, 2011,2012, there were 4,257,994,01619,789,407,996 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2011,2012, with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our common stock is authorized for issuance, aggregated as follows:
| (i) | all compensation plans previously approved by security holders; and |
| (ii) | all compensation plans not previously approved by security holders: |
None.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Except as described below, none of the following persons has any direct or indirect material interest in any transaction to which we are a party during the past two years, or in any proposed transaction to which the Company is proposed to be a party:
(A) any director or officer;
(B) any proposed nominee for election as a director;
(C) any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our common stock; or
(D) any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same house as such person or who is a director or officer of any parent or subsidiary.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
| Audit Fees | Audit-Related Fees | Tax Fees | All Other Fees | ||||||
| 2011 | $ | 17,000 | none | none | none | ||||
| 2010 | $ | 17,000 | none | none | none | ||||
| 2009 | $ | 0 | none | none | none | ||||
| 2008 | $ | 0 | none | none | none | ||||
| Audit Fees | Audit-Related Fees | Tax Fees | All Other Fees | ||||||||||
| 2012 | $ | 10,500 | None | None | None | ||||||||
| 2011 | $ | 17,000 | None | None | None | ||||||||
| 2010 | $ | 17,000 | None | None | None | ||||||||
We have no formal audit committee. However, our entire Board of Directors (the "Board"“Board”) is our defacto audit committee. In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Board obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and us that might bear on the auditors'auditors’ independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, "Independence“Independence Discussions with Audit Committees."” The Board discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence, including fees for non-audit services, and satisfied itself as to the auditors'auditors’ independence. The Board also discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of its internal controls. The Board reviewed with the independent auditors their management letter on internal controls.
The Board discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all matters required to be discussed by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, "Communication“Communication with Audit Committees"Committees”. The Board reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 20112012 with management and the independent auditors.
Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Company'sCompany’s financial statements and the independent auditors have the responsibility for the examination of those statements. Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with the independent auditors and management, the Board of Directors approved the Company'sCompany’s audited consolidated financial statements and recommended that they be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) The exhibits required to be filed herewith by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, as described in the following index of exhibits, are incorporated herein by reference, as follows:
| Exhibit No. | Description | |
| 31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
| 31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
| 32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
| 32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
* Filed herewith
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on our behalf and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| World Health Energy Holdings, Inc. | |||
| (Registrant) | |||
| Date: | By: | /s/ | |
| President, CEO, Director | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ | President, CEO, Director | |||
| David Lieberman |