UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
2008
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission file number 001-14691
WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware95-3980449

(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)
 95-3980449
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
40 West 57th Street10019

New York, NY
(Zip Code)

(Address of principal executive offices)
 10019
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 641-2000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
   
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock ExchangeNone
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yesþo Nooþ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filero                   Accelerated filerþ                  Non-accelerated filero             Smaller reporting companyo
                                               (Do
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filerþNon-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyo
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
The aggregate market value of Commoncommon stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $507.7 million$107,300 based on the last reported sales price of the registrant’s Commoncommon stock on June 29, 200730, 2008 and assuming solely for the purpose of this calculation that all directors and officers of the registrant are “affiliates.” The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of January 31, 2008, 87,118,088February 28, 2009, 101,258,642 shares (excluding treasury shares) of Commoncommon stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding and 291,722 shares of Class B Stock,stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2008our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders (which will be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s 20072008 fiscal year end) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
 
 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTE 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 3.2
Exhibit 10.46
Exhibit 10.48
Exhibit 10.49
Exhibit 10.50
Exhibit 10.51
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 23
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2


PART I
Item 1. Business
In this report, “Westwood One,” “Company,” “registrant,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Westwood One, Inc.
General
We supplyprovide radio and television stations with programming information services and programming.other content. We are one of the largest domestic outsource provideroutsourced providers of traffic reporting services and one of the nation’s largest radio networks, producing and distributing national news, sports, talk, music and special event programs, in addition to local news, sports, weather, video news and other information programming. We deliver content to over 5,000 radio and television stations in the U.S.
We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of :10 second, :15 second, :30 second and :60 second commercial airtime to advertisers. We obtain the commercial airtime we sell to advertisers from radio and television affiliates, or other distribution partners, in exchange for the programming, or information services it providesand other content that we provide to them. We often provide such affiliates with cash compensation to obtain additional commercial airtime in order to supplement the commercial airtime we receive from providing programming and information services by providing affiliates with compensation to obtain additional commercial airtime.them. That commercial airtime is sold to local/regional advertisers (typically :10 second and :15 second commercial airtime) and to national advertisers (typically :30 or :60 second commercial airtime). By purchasing commercial airtime from us, advertisers are able to have their prerecorded and live commercial messages broadcast on radio and television stations and websites throughout the United States, reaching demographically defined listening audiences.
We provideOur business is organized in two primary divisions: Metro/Traffic and Network. Our Metro/Traffic Division provides local traffic, news, sports and weather information broadcast reports to 2,300 radio and television affiliates in over 9583 of the top 100 Metro Survey Area markets (referred to herein as “MSA markets”) in the United States. We also offerOur Network Division offers radio stations traditional news services, including CBS Radio news, and CNN Radio news and NBC News Radio, in addition to weekday and weekend news, sports and entertainment features and programs. These programs include: major sporting events, including the National Football League, NCAA football and basketball games, the National Hockey League, the Masters and the Olympics, live personality intensive talk shows, live concert broadcasts, countdown shows, music and interview programs and exclusive satellite simulcasts with cable networks.
We continue to develop alternative revenue streams generally by leveraging our existing resources and creating new distribution channels for our extensive content. WeFor instance, we provide programming to satellite radio services services to complimentary distribution channels,and data for digital map and automotive navigation systems,systems.
On October 2, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with CBS Radio documenting a long-term arrangement through March 31, 2017. The closing under such agreement occurred on March 3, 2008 and for distribution into all electronic mediums.
Until recently,on such date, the Management Agreement and CBS Representation Agreement terminated. From 1994 to 2008, we were managed for fourteen years by CBS Radio Inc. (“CBS Radio”; previously known as Infinity Broadcasting Corporation (“Infinity”)), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBS Corporation, pursuant to a management agreement between CBS Radio (then Infinity) and us which was scheduled to expire on March 31, 2009 (the “Management Agreement”). On October 2, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with CBS Radio documenting a long-term arrangement through March 31, 2017. The closing under such agreement occurred on March 3, 2008 and on such date, the Management Agreement and CBS Representation Agreement terminated. As part of the new arrangement, CBS Radio agreed to broadcast our commercial inventory for ourboth the Network and Metro/Traffic and Information divisions through March 31, 2017 in exchange for certain programming and/or cash compensation. In addition, certain existing agreements between CBS Radio and us, including the News Programming Agreement, the Technical Services Agreement and the Trademark License Agreement were amended and restated through March 31, 2017.
Industry Background
Radio Broadcasting
There are approximately 11,00011,682 commercial radio stations in the United States.

-2-


A radio station selects a style of programming (“format”) to attract a target listening audience and thereby attracts advertisers that are targeting that audience demographic. There are many formats from which a station may select, including news, talk, sports and various types of music and entertainment programming.

- 2 -


A radio station has two principal ways of effectively competing for revenue. First, it can differentiate itself in its local market by selecting and successfully executing a format targeted at a particular audience, thus enabling advertisers to place their commercial messages on stations aimed at audiences with certain demographic characteristics. A station can also broadcast special programming, syndicated shows, sporting events or national news products, such as those supplied by us, that are generally not available to its competitors within its format. National programming broadcast on an exclusive geographica limited distribution basis can help differentiate a station within its market, and thereby enable a station to increase its audience and advertising revenue.
In addition to the traditional “terrestrial” radio stations, new technologies and services have entered the marketplace. Currently, there areSirius XM Radio Inc. is a number of satellite-based broadcastersbroadcaster with programming very similar to traditional radio. Additionally, the radio industry has begun to roll out HD “High Definition” channels which may effectively increasedouble the number of radio stations in the United States.
Radio Advertising
Radio advertising timeis a cost-effective form of advertising that can be purchased on a local, regional or national basis. Local and regional purchases allow an advertiser to choose a geographic market for the broadcast of commercial messages. Local and regional purchases are typically best suited for an advertiser whose business or ad campaign is in a specific geographic area. Advertising purchased from a national radio network allows an advertiser to target its commercial messages to a specific demographic audience, nationally, onof a cost-efficient basis.national audience. In addition, an advertiser can choose to emphasize its message in a certain market or markets by supplementing a national purchase with local and/or regional purchases.
To plan its estimated network audience delivery and demographic composition, specific historical measurement information is available to advertisers from independent rating services such as Arbitron and their RADAR rating service. The rating service provides historical demographic information such as the age and gender composition of the listening audiences. Consequently, advertisers can predict that their advertisements are being heard by their target listening audience.
In addition to targeting and reaching defined audiences, our products provide creative marketing opportunities, including endorsements by trusted personalities, product integration, association with high quality and desirable blue chip programming and on-location sponsorship opportunities at cost effective rates.
Business Strategy/Services
Our business strategy is to provide for the programming needs ofour radio stations by supplying to radio stationsand television affiliates with programs and services that individual stationsthey may not be able to produce on their own on a cost effective basis. We offer radio stationslocal traffic, news, sports and newsweather information, as well as a wide selection of regularly scheduled and special event syndicated programming. The information and programs are produced by us and, therefore, the stationsour affiliates typically have virtually no production costs. With respect to our programs, each program is offered for broadcast by us exclusively to one station in its geographic market, which assists the station in competing for audience share in its local marketplace. In addition, except for news programming, our programs contain available commercial airtime that the stationsaffiliates may sell to local advertisers. We typically distribute promotional announcements to the stationsaffiliates and occasionally placesplace advertisements in trade and consumer publications to further promote the upcoming broadcast of its programs.
We expanded ourOur robust local and national product offerings in 1996 to include providing local traffic, news, sports and weather programming to radio stations and other media outlets in selected cities across the United States. This expansion gave ouroffering allows advertisers the ability to easily supplement their national purchases with local and regional purchases from us. It also allowedallows us to develop relationships with local and regional advertisers.

-3-


We enter into affiliation arrangements with radio and television stations which require the affiliate to provide us with a specific number of commercial positions which it aggregates by similar day and time periods and resellsthat we are able to itsresell to our advertisers. Some affiliation agreements also require a station to broadcast our programs and to use a portion of the program’s commercial slots to air our advertisers’ national advertisements and any related promotional spots.
Affiliation arrangements specify the number of times and the approximate daypart each program and advertisement may be broadcast. We require that each station complete and promptly return to us an affidavit (proof-of-performance) that verifies the time of each broadcast. Affiliation agreements generally run for a period of at least one year and are automatically renewable for subsequent periods. We have agreements with over 5,000 radio stations, and 170 television stations, many of which havewho carry more than one arrangement.program or product.

- 3 -


We have personnel responsible for stationaffiliate sales and marketing itsour programs to radio and television stations. Our staff develops and maintains close, professional relationships with radio and television station personnel to provide them with quickcomprehensive programming assistance.
Local Network Division
We produce and distribute regularly scheduled and special syndicated programs, including exclusive live concerts, music and interview shows, national music countdowns, lifestyle short features, news broadcasts, talk programs, sporting events and sports features.
We control most aspects of the production of our programs, and accordingly, are able to customize our programs to respond to current and/or changing listening preferences. We produce regularly scheduled short-form programs (typically five minutes or less) and long-form programs (typically 60 minutes or longer). Typically, the short-form programs are produced at our in-house facilities located in Culver City, California, and New York, New York. The long-form programs include shows produced primarily at our in-house production facilities and recordings of live concert performances and sports events made on location.
We also produce and distribute special event syndicated programs. In 2008, we produced and distributed numerous special event programs, including exclusive radio broadcasts of The GRAMMY Awards, the Academy of Country Music Awards, MTV Music Awards and the BET Awards, among others.
We obtain most of the programming for our concert series by recording live concert performances of prominent recording artists. The agreements with these artists often provide the exclusive right to broadcast the concerts worldwide over the radio (whether live or pre-recorded) for a specified period of time. We may also obtain interviews with the recording artist and retain a copy of the recording of the concert and the interview for use in our radio programs and as additions to our extensive tape library. The agreements provide the artist with master recordings of their concerts and nationwide exposure on affiliated radio stations. In certain of these cases, the artists may receive compensation.
Our syndicated programs are primarily produced at our in-house production facilities. We determine the content and style of a program based on the target audience we wish to reach. We assign a producer, writer, narrator or host, interviewer and other personnel to record and produce the programs. Because we control the production process, we can refine the programs’ content to respond to the needs of our affiliated stations and national advertisers. In addition, we can tailor program content in response to current and anticipated audience demand. We use copy-splitting technology where appropriate to differentiate content on a regional or local basis.
We believe that our tape library is a valuable resource for use in future programming and revenue generating capabilities. The library contains previously broadcast programs, thousands of live concert performances; over 19,000 artist interviews; daily news programs; sports and entertainment features; Capitol Hill hearings and other special events. New programs can be created and developed at a low cost by excerpting material from the library.
Metro/Traffic and Information ProgrammingDivision
Through our Metro/Traffic and Information Division, we provide traffic reports and local news, weather and sports information programming to radio and television affiliates.affiliates and their websites.
We gather traffic and other data utilizing our information-gathering infrastructure, which includes aircraft (helicopters and airplanes), broadcast-quality remote camera systems positioned at strategically located fixed positions and on aircraft, mobile units and wireless systems, and by accessing various government-based traffic tracking systems. We also gather information from various third-party news and information services. The information is processed, converted into broadcast copy and entered into our computer systems by our local writers and producers. This permits us to easily re-sell the information to third parties for distribution through the internet, wireless devices or personal digital assistants (“PDAs”) and various other distribution channels. Our professional announcers read the customized reports on the air. Our information reports (including the length of report,and content of report, specific geographic coverage area, time of broadcast, number of reports aired per day and broadcaster’s style, etc.)style) are customized to meet each individual affiliate’s requirements. We typically work closely with the program directors, news directors and general managers of our affiliates to ensure that our services meet the affiliates’ goals and standards. We and the affiliates jointly select the on-air talent to ensure that each on-air talent’s style is appropriate for the station’s format. Our on-air talent often becomes integral “personalities” on such affiliate stations as a result of their significant on-air presence and interaction with the stations’ on-air personnel. In order to realize operating efficiencies, we endeavor to utilize our professional on-air talent on multiple affiliate stations within a particular market.

- 4 -


We believe that our extensive fleet of aircraft and other information-gathering technology and broadcast equipment have allowedcoupled with our recently executed exclusive license and service agreement with TrafficLand allow us to provide high quality programming enablingthat enables us to retain andcontinue to expand our affiliate base. In the aggregate, we utilize approximately: 7761 helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft; 2015 mobile units; 3025 airborne camera systems; 182 fixed-position proprietary cameras; 6536 broadcast studios and approximately 1,5001,000 broadcasters and producers. We also maintain a staff of computer programmers and graphics experts to supply customized graphics and other visual programming elements to television station affiliates. In addition, our operation centers and broadcast studios have sophisticated computer technology, video and broadcast equipment and cellular and wireless technology, which enables our on-air talent to deliver reports to our affiliates. The infrastructure and resources dedicated to a specific market by us are determined by the size of the market, the number of affiliates we serve in the market and the type of services being provided. We believe our long-standing and continued investment in incident data and traffic gathering infrastructure differentiates us from our competitors.
We generally do not require our affiliates to identify us as the supplier of our information reports. This provides our affiliates with a high degree of customization and flexibility, as each affiliate has the right to present the information reports provided by us as if the affiliate had generated the reports with its own resources.

-4-


As a result of our extensive network of operations and talent, we regularly report breaking and important news stories and provide our affiliates with live coverage of these stories. We are able to customize and personalize our reports of breaking stories using our individual affiliates’ call letters from the scene of news events as we did when providing live airborne coverage of the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and Hurricane Katrina. By using our news helicopters, we feed live video to television affiliates around the country. Moreover, by leveraging our infrastructure, the same reporters provide live customized airborne reports for our radio affiliates via our Metro Source service, which is described below. We believe that we are the only radio network news organization that has local studio operations that cover in excess of 90 markets and that is able to provide customized reports to these markets.
Metro Source, an information service available to subscribing affiliates, is an information system and digital audio workstation that allows our news affiliates to receive via satellite and view, write, edit and report the latest news, features and show preparation material. With this product, we provide continuously updated and breaking news, weather, sports, business and entertainment information to our affiliate stations which have subscribed to the service. Information and content for Metro Source is primarily generated from our staff of news bureau chiefs, state correspondents and professional news writers and reporters.
Local, regional and national news and information stories are fed to our national news operations center in Phoenix, Arizona where the information is verified, edited, produced and disseminated via satellite to our internal Metro Source workstations located in each of our operations centers and to workstations located at affiliate radio stations nationwide. Metro Source includes proprietary software that allows for customizing reports and editing in both audio and text formats. The benefit to stations is that Metro Source allows them to substantially reduce time and cost from the news gathering and editing process at the station level, while providing greater volume and quality news and information coverage from a single source.
Television Programming Services
We supply Television Traffic Services (“MetroTV Services”) to over 190 television stations. Similar to our radio programming services, we supply our MetroTV Services customized information reports which are generally delivered on air by our reporters to our television station affiliates. In addition, we supply customized graphics and other visual programming elements to our television station affiliates.
We utilize live studio cameras in order to enable our traffic reporters to provide our Video News Services on television from our local broadcast studios. In addition, we provide Video News Services from our aircraft and fixed-position based camera systems. The Video News Services include: (i) live video coverage from strategically located fixed-position camera systems; (ii) live video news feeds from our aircraft; and (iii) full-service, 24 hours per day/7 days per week video coverage from our camera crews using broadcast quality camera equipment and news vehicles.
SmartRoute Systems
SmartRoute (“SRS”), whose operating assets werewe acquired by us in 2000, develops non-broadcast traffic information. SRS develops innovative techniques for gathering local traffic and transportation information, as well as new methods of distributing such information to the public. We are currently working with several public and private entities across the United States to improve dissemination of traffic and transportation information. SRS revenue is not presently a significant source of revenue to us.
Through SRS,We supply Television Traffic Services (“MetroTV Services”) to over 170 television stations. Similar to our radio programming services, we collect, organize and distribute a database of advanced travelersupply our MetroTV Services customized information reports which are generally delivered on air by our reporters to automobiles, homes and offices through various electronic media and telecommunications. We deliver our information under the SRS brand name.television station affiliates. In addition, we have participated in a number of Federalsupply customized graphics and State funded Intelligent Transportation System projects, including various operational 511 Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”), advanced web sites, and combined advanced traveler and transit information systems for Massachusetts, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Missouri and New Jersey Departments of Transportation. SRS also operates Traffic Management Centers for Jacksonville, Florida; Massachusetts; South East Florida; and New Jersey Departments of Transportation.
We have been working with a variety of private companiesother visual programming elements to deploy commercial products and services involving traveler information. These relationships allow for the provision of information on a personalized basis through numerous delivery mechanisms, including the internet, paging, FM subcarrier, traditional cellular and newly-developed and evolving wireless systems. Information can be delivered to a wide array of devices including pagers, computers, and in-vehicle navigation and information systems. In particular, we have been aggressively working to expand our “Real-Traffic” product line primarily by adding real-time traffic information on the internet.television station affiliates.

 

-5-- 5 -


National Radio Programming
We produce and distribute regularly scheduled and special syndicated programs, including exclusiveutilize live concerts, music and interview shows, national music countdowns, lifestyle short features, news broadcasts, talk programs, sporting events and sports features.
We control most aspects of the production ofstudio cameras in order to enable our programs, and accordingly, are abletraffic reporters to customizeprovide our programs to respond to current and/or changing listening preferences. We produce regularly scheduled short-form programs (typically five minutes or less) and long-form programs (typically 60 minutes or longer). Typically, the short-form programs are produced atVideo News Services on television from our in-house facilities located in Culver City, California, and New York, New York. The long-form programs include shows produced primarily at our in-house production facilities and recordings of live concert performances and sports events made on location.
We also produce and distribute special event syndicated programs. In 2007, we produced and distributed numerous special event programs, including exclusive radio broadcasts of The GRAMMY Awards, the Academy of Country Music Awards, MTV Music Awards and the BET Awards, among others.
We obtain most of the programming for our concert series by recording live concert performances of prominent recording artists. The agreements with these artists often provide the exclusive right tolocal broadcast the concerts worldwide over the radio (whether live or pre-recorded) for a specified period of time. We may also obtain interviews with the recording artist and retain a copy of the recording of the concert and the interview for use in our radio programs and as additions to our extensive tape library. The agreements provide the artist with master recordings of their concerts and nationwide exposure on affiliated radio stations. In certain of these cases, the artists may receive compensation.
Our syndicated programs are primarily produced at our in-house production facilities. We determine the content and style of a program based on the target audience we wish to reach. We assign a producer, writer, narrator or host, interviewer and other personnel to record and produce the programs. Because we control the production process, we can refine the programs’ content to respond to the needs of our affiliated stations and national advertisers.studios. In addition, we can tailor program contentprovide Video News Services from our aircraft and fixed-position based camera systems. The Video News Services include: (1) live video coverage from strategically located fixed-position camera systems; (2) live video news feeds from our aircraft; and (3) full-service, 24 hours per day/7 days per week video coverage from our camera crews using broadcast quality camera equipment and news vehicles.
TrafficLand
On December 22, 2008, Metro Networks Communications, Inc. (Metro) and TrafficLand entered into a License and Services Agreement which provides us with a three-year license to market and distribute TrafficLand services and products. Concurrent with the execution of the License Agreement, Westwood One, Inc. (Metro’s parent), TLAC, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westwood formed for such purpose) and TrafficLand entered into an option agreement granting us the right to acquire 100% of the stock of TrafficLand pursuant to the terms of a Merger Agreement which the parties have negotiated and placed in responseescrow. As a result of payments previously made under the License Agreement, we have the right to current and anticipated audience demand.
We believe thatcause the Merger Agreement to be released from escrow at any time on or prior to April 15, 2009, at which time the Merger Agreement is deemed “executed”. The release of the Merger Agreement does not guarantee the merger will close, as such agreement contains closing conditions, including the consent of our tape library is a valuable resource for use in future programming and revenue generating capabilities. The library contains previously broadcast programs, thousandslenders. Upon consummation of live concert performances; over 16,000 artist interviews; daily news programs; sports and entertainment features; Capitol Hill hearings and other special events. New programs can be created and developed at a low cost by excerpting material from the library.closing of the merger, the License Agreement would terminate. Costs of $800 associated with this transaction have been expensed as of December 31, 2008.
Advertising Sales and Marketing
We package our radio commercial airtime on a network basis, covering all affiliates in relevant markets, either locally, regionally or nationally. This packaged airtime typically appeals to advertisers seeking a broad demographic reach. Because we generally sell our commercial airtime on a network basis rather than station-by-station, we generally do not compete for advertising dollars with individual local radio station affiliates. We believe that this is a key factor in maintaining our affiliate relationships. We package our television commercial airtime on a local, regional and national network basis. We have developed a separate sales force to sell our television commercial airtime and to optimize the efforts of our national internal structure of sales representatives. Our advertising sales force is comprised of approximately 130125 sales representatives and sales managers, who are part of a larger sales workforce.managers.
In mostmany of the markets in which the Metro/Traffic and Information Division conducts operations, we maintain an advertising sales office as part of our operations center. Our advertising sales force is able to sell available commercial airtime in any and all of our markets in addition to selling such airtime in each local market, which we believe affords our sales representatives an advantage over certain competitors. For example, an airline advertiser can purchase sponsorship advertising packages in multiple markets from our local sales representative in the city in which the airline is headquartered.

-6-


Our typical radio advertisement for traffic, news, sports and weather information programming consists of an opening announcement and a ten-second or fifteen-second commercial message presented immediately prior to, in the middle of, or immediately following a regularly scheduled information report. Because we have numerous radio station affiliates in each of our markets (averaging approximately 25 affiliates per market in our top 50 markets), we believe that our traffic and information broadcasts reach more people, more often, in a higher impact manner than can be achieved using any other advertising medium. We combine our commercial airtime into multiple “sponsorship” packages which we sell as an information sponsorship package to advertisers throughout our networks on a local, regional or national basis, primarily during morning and afternoon drive periods.
We believe that the positioning of advertisements within or adjacent to our information reports appeals to advertisers because the advertisers’ messages are broadcast along with regularly scheduled programming during peak morning and afternoon drive times when a majority of the radio audience is listening. Radio advertisements broadcast during these times typically generate premium rates. Moreover, surveys commissioned by us demonstrate that because our customized information reports are related to topics of significant interest to listeners, listeners often seek out our information reports. Since advertisers’ messages are embedded in our information reports, such messages have a high degree of impact on listeners and generally will not be “pre-empted” (i.e., moved by the radio station to another time slot). Most of ourWe offer advertisements that are read live by our on-air talent, providing our advertisers with the added benefit of an implied endorsement for their product.product, as well as pre-recorded.

- 6 -


Our Network Division provides national advertisers with a cost-effective way to communicate their commercial messages to large listening audiences nationwide through purchases of commercial airtime in our national radio networks and programs. An advertiser can obtain both frequency (number of exposures to the target audience) and reach (size of listening audience) by purchasing advertising time from us. By purchasing time in networks or programs directed to different formats, advertisers can be assured of obtaining high market penetration and visibility as their commercial messages will be broadcast on several stations in the same market at the same time. On occasion, we support our national sponsors with promotional announcements and advertisements in trade and consumer publications. This support promotes the upcoming broadcasts of our programs and is designed to increase the advertisers’ target listening audience.
In most cases, we provide our MetroTV Services to television stations in exchange for thirty-second commercial airtime that we package and sell on a national basis. The amount and placement of the commercial airtime that we receive from television stations varies by market and the type of service provided by us. As we have provided enhanced television video services, we have been able to acquire more valuable commercial airtime. We believe that it offers advertisers significant benefits because, unlike traditional television networks, we often deliver more than one station in major markets and advertisers may select specific markets.
We have established a morning TV news network for our advertisers’ commercials to air during local news programming and local news breaks in most dayparts. Because we have affiliated a large number of network television stations in major markets, our morning news network delivers a significant national household rating in an efficient and compelling local news environment. As we continue to expand our service offerings for local television affiliates, we plan to create additional news networks to leverage our television news gathering infrastructure.
Competition
In the MSA markets in which we operate, we compete for advertising revenue with local print and other forms of communications media, including magazines, local radio, outdoor advertising, network radio and network television advertising, transit advertising, direct response advertising, yellow page directories, internet/new media and point-of-sale advertising. Although we are significantly larger than the next largest provider of traffic and local information services, there are several multi-market operations providing local radio and television programming services in various markets. Furthermore, in recent history, the radio industry has experienced a significant increase in the number of shorter-duration commercial inventory. Also, the consolidation of the radio industry has created opportunities for large radio groups, such as Clear Channel Communications, CBS Radio, ABC and Citadel and other station owners to gather information on their own.

-7-


In marketing our programs to national advertisers, we directly compete with other radio networks as well as with independent radio syndication producers and distributors. As a result of consolidation in the radio industry, companies owning large groups of stations have begun to create competing networks that have resulted in additional competition for local, regional and network radio advertising expenditures. In addition, we compete for advertising revenue with network television, cable television, print and other forms of communications media. We believe that the quality of our programming and the strength of our stationaffiliate relations and advertising sales forces enable us to compete effectively with other forms of communication media. We market our programs to radio stations, including affiliates of other radio networks that we believe will have the largest and most desirable listening audience for each of our programs. We often have different programs airing on a number of stations in the same geographic market at the same time. We believe that in comparison with any other independent radio syndication producer and distributor or radio network we have a more diversified selection of programming from which national advertisers and radio stations may choose. In addition, we both produce and distribute programs, thereby enabling us to respond more effectively to the demands of advertisers and radio stations.
The increase in the number of program formats has led to increased competition among local radio stations for audience. As stations attempt to differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive environment, their demand for quality programming available from outside programming sources increases. This demand has been intensified by high operating and production costs at local radio stations and increased competition for local advertising revenue.

- 7 -


Government Regulation
Radio broadcasting and station ownership are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). As a producer and distributor of radio programs and information services, we are generally not subject to regulation by the FCC. The Traffic and Information Division utilizes FCC regulated two-way radio frequencies pursuant to licenses issued by the FCC.
Employees
On December 31, 2007,2008, we had approximately 2,0001,671 employees, including 672583 part-time employees. In addition, we maintain continuing relationships with numerous independent writers, program hosts, technical personnel and producers. Approximately 570470 of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe relations with our employees, unions and independent contractors are satisfactory.
Available Information
We are a Delaware corporation, having re-incorporated in Delaware on June 21, 1985. Our current and periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including amendments to those reports, may be obtained through our internet website atwww.westwoodone.com, from us in print upon request or from the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these reports with the SEC. Additionally, any reports or information that we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, Washington, DC. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates.
Cautionary Statement regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report on Form 10-K, including “Item 1A—Risk Factors” and “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Financial Condition,” contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements we make or others make on our behalf. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These statements are not based on historical fact but rather are based on management’s views and assumptions concerning future events and results at the time the statements are made. No assurances can be given that management’s expectations will come to pass. There may be additional risks, uncertainties and factors that we do not currently view as material or that are not necessarily known. Any forward-looking statements included in this document are only made as of the date of this document and we do not have any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

-8-


Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our Commoncommon stock is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described below could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of our Common stock.operations.

- 8 -


Risks Related to Our Business
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we failed to pay our most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect of the existing $150,000 of ten-year Senior Notes due November 30, 2012 and $50,000 of seven-year Senior Notes due November 30, 2009 (the foregoing, the “Senior Notes”) and were not in compliance with our maximum leverage ratio covenant at December 31, 2008. Both of these events constitute a separate default under the existing Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility (collectively the “Facility”) and the Senior Notes. In addition, on February 27, 2009, our outstanding Facility matured and became due and payable in its entirety. We did not pay such amount, which also constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. As a result management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. While we have agreed in principle on terms to refinance our outstanding debt with our lenders, there can be no assurance that we will consummate the refinancing transaction. While the parties are working towards execution of definitive documentation, if we are unable to reach a definitive agreement, we would not be able to continue as a going concern and could potentially be forced to seek relief through a filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
An Event of Default has occurred under the terms of our Facility and our Senior Notes. While we have an agreement in principle on terms to refinance all of our debt, there can be no assurance that we will close the refinancing or that the lenders under the Facility and our Senior Notes will not seek to exercise remedies that may be available to them prior to such closing, which would have a material and adverse effect on our business.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we failed to pay our most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect of the existing Senior Notes and were not in compliance with our maximum leverage ratio covenant at December 31, 2008. Both of these events constitute a separate default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. In addition, on February 27, 2009, our outstanding Facility matured and became due and payable in its entirety. We did not pay such amount, which also constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. If we are unable to negotiate definitive documentation with our lenders, entities managed by The Gores Group, LLC, (together with its affiliates, “Gores”) and a new third party lender, or if our lenders decide for any reason to exercise available remedies under the Facility and the Senior Notes, in the absence of obtaining approximately $47,000 in additional capital to satisfy such payments and our obtaining a waiver of our 4.0 to 1.0 debt leverage covenant (which we anticipate violating upon delivery of our audited financial statements as described elsewhere in this report), we will not be able to make such payments and could be forced to seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws.
Our Operating Incomeoperating income has declined since 2002. We may not be able to reverse this trend particularly in the current economic environment or reduce costs sufficiently to offset anticipated declines in revenue.
Since 2002, our Operating Incomeoperating income has declined from approximately $166 million$180,000 to $63 million,an operating loss of $(438,041) ($19,430 exclusive of goodwill impairment charges of $430,126, restructuring charges of $14,100 and special charges of $13,245), with the most significant decline $144 million to $63 million, occurring in the past two years (exclusive of goodwill impairment charges).three years. In addition, our 2006 and 2008 results were adversely affected by a $516 million goodwill impairment charge. We cannot provide any assurances thatcharges of approximately $516,000 and $430,000, respectively. Given the current economic climate, it is possible our operating income will continue to decline. Historically, we will behave been able to reverse this trendreduce expenses to partially mitigate the impact of declining Operating Income the decline in our revenue and its effect on operating income. However, given the extensive restructuring of the Metro/Traffic division from 61 offices into 13 hubs (announced in Q3 of 2008 and anticipated to be completed by the end of Q2 of 2009), our ability to implement further significant cost reductions without negatively affecting our revenue is somewhat limited, and may make it difficult for us to mitigate the impact of further declines in revenue.
The global credit market disruptions and economic slowdown which significantly worsened in the third quarter of 2008 have created a difficult and uncertain environment across all industries and there is no immediate sign of a recovery.
The recent credit market disruptions and economic contraction in the United States and globally have been severe, creating an economic environment unseen in recent history. Aside from the decline in consumer spending as described below, many of our clients could face their own difficulties in obtaining necessary financing to fund their ordinary course business operations. Given the economic downturn and the tight credit markets, many advertisers are reducing their ad budgets and/or that we will not have future impairment or other charges that adversely affect Operating Income. negotiating reductions in rates, each of which has impacted our financial results. Depending on the severity of the economic downturn and the pace of recovery, our operating results could continue to be negatively impacted.

- 9 -


Even if we are initially successful in reversingcomplete the downward trend, we may not be able to sustainrefinancing, the improvement on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to reverse the downward trend in Operating Income will negatively affect the market pricecost of our Common stock,indebtedness is expected to increase substantially, which, when combined with our recent performance of declining revenue, will affect our liquidity and could limit our ability to access capital marketsimplement our business plan and could result in a violation of a loan covenant.
Our business may not grow in the futurerespond competitively.
Since 2004, our revenue has declined from $562 millionapproximately $562,000 to $451 million.$404,000. This decrease in revenue has been attributable to a decline in audience and in the quality and quantity of commercial inventory on both a local/regional and a national basis, increased competition, a decline in a number of customer accounts and a substantial reduction in sales persons and an increase in competition.persons. Our strategy to growincrease revenue is dependent on, among other things, our ability to reverse thethese declines in audience, we have experienced, improve our affiliate base, hire additional sales persons and managers, modernize our distribution system and expand our product offerings to other distribution platforms, all of which, to varying degrees, require additional capital. While we have reached an agreement in principle with our lenders and Gores on the terms of a refinancing, which we anticipate will requireprovide us with access to an infusionadditional $35,000 in capital, we cannot be certain the completion of capital, which as discussed belowsuch refinancing will occur. If the refinancing is presently limited and could be further constrained in the future. Our ability to implement this strategy will also depend on a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, including the general economy, the perception by advertisers and clientscompleted, we anticipate that we offer an effective way of reaching their targeted demographic group, and our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and management. We cannot predict at this time to what degree, if any, we will be able to implement our growth strategy successfully.
We may not be able to obtain future capital on terms favorable to us, which could have negative consequencesannual interest payments on our businessdebt will increase from approximately $12,000 to $19,000; $7,000 of this interest may be paid in kind (PIK).
As a result If the economy continues to stall and advertisers continue to maintain reduced budgets which do not recover in 2009, notwithstanding the closing of the deterioration in our operating performance, we amended our senior loan agreement in October 2006 and again in January and February 2008 with a syndicate of banks, increasing the total debt ratio covenant from 3.50 to 1 (effective after March 31, 2008) to 4.00 to 1. Further declines in our operating performance may cause us to seek further amendments to the covenants under our existing senior loan agreement and the Senior Notes or to seek to replace the senior loan agreement, which matures on February 28, 2009, and/or our Senior Notes, in their entirety. Our ability and timing to obtain, if needed, additional amendments or additional financing, or to refinance our existing debt may be impacted by factors outside our control. Additionally any refinancing, of our Senior Notes will likely require the payment to our note holders of an amount greater than the principal amount of the Senior Notes due to a make-whole requirement in the Note Purchase Agreement. The amount of such make- whole payment will continue to increase if interest rates continue to decline, and conversely will decrease as interest rates rise.

-9-


While we recently announced the execution of a purchase agreement with Gores Radio Holdings, LLC (together with certain related entities, “Gores”), an entity managed by The Gores Group, LLC, where they agreed to purchase between $50.0-$75.0 million of 7.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants, the issuance of such preferred stock and warrants is subject to approval by our shareholders. While certain officers and directors executed a voting agreement agreeing to vote in favor of such transaction, holders of a majority of Company Common stock must approve the transaction. If our shareholders do not approve the issues of the preferred stock and warrants, we may be required to obtain additional capital on terms that may be less favorable than the Gores preferred stock/warrants transaction. Furthermore, additional financing may not be available when we need it or, if available, financing may not be on terms favorable to us or to our shareholders. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay the implementation or reduce the scope of our growth strategy, which could adversely affectbusiness plan and our business. If financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be unableability to develop or enhance our services or programs. In addition,programs could be curtailed. Without additional revenue and/or capital, we may be unable to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures. Also, if we are unablepressures, such as M&A opportunities or securing rights to refinancemarquee or repay our debt at maturity, itpopular programming. If any of the foregoing should occur, this could have a material and adverse effect on our business continuity, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.business.
Our revenue and income could further decline as a result ofif the general economy and industry-specific economic trends,broadcast industry do not improve and declines ineven more so if the economy and industry worsen, and consumer spending remains constrained or is further restricted.
Our revenue is largely based on advertisers seeking to stimulate consumer spending. In recent months, consumer confidence has eroded significantly amid the national and global economic slowdown, increased unemployment and layoffs and the general belief that the U.S. has entered a recession, which many now believe to be a sustained recession and/or contraction. Advertising expenditures and consumer spending tend to decline during recessionary periods and may also decline at other times. Prolonged weaknessthey have done so in this economy, as advertising budgets in the economy may causeretail, automotive and financial services industries have softened. More recently, advertisers (and the agencies that represent them), faced with their own reduced budgets and sales levels, have put increased pressure on advertising rates, in some cases, requesting broad percentage discounts on ad buys, demanding increased levels of inventory and re-negotiating booked orders. Reductions in advertising expenditures and declines in ad rates have affected our customers to reduce or cancel orders of airtime. This also may lead to price pressures. Accordingly, our revenue and operating margins could further decline during a general economic downturn.revenues.
Our audiencebusiness is subject to increased competition resulting from new entrants into our business, consolidated companies and revenue may decline as a resultnew technology/platforms, each of programming changes made by our affiliated stations.
While we provide programmingwhich has the potential to all major radio station groups, we have affiliation agreements with most of CBS Radio’s owned and operated radio stations which, in the aggregate, provide us with a significant portion of the audience and/or commercial inventory that we sell to advertisers. In addition, we are the exclusive provider of the CBS News product and have purchased several other pieces of programming from CBS and its affiliates. Since 2006 we have experienced a material decline in the amount of audience and quantity and quality of commercial inventory delivered by the CBS Radio owned and operated radio stations. Reasons for the decline included: (1) the cancellation of key national programming and the loss of CBS’ Howard Stern; (2) the sale of CBS radio stations; and (3) the reduction of commercial inventory levels, including certain RADAR inventory, provided to us under affiliation agreements. At this time, it is unclear whether this decline is permanent. To the extent the decline is permanent, our operating performance would be materially adversely impacted.
Competition may adversely affect our business and cause our stock price to declinebusiness..
We compete in a highly competitive business. Our radio programming competes for audiences and advertising revenue directly with radio and television stations and other syndicated programming, as well as with such other media such as newspapers, magazines, cable television, outdoor advertising and direct mail. Audiencemail and more increasingly with digital media. We may experience increased audience fragmentation caused by the proliferation of new media platforms. Additionally, audience ratings and performance-based revenue arrangements are subject to change and any adverse change in a particular geographic area could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to attract not only advertisers in that region, but national advertisers as well. Increased competition, in part, has resulted in reduced market share, and could result in lower audience levels, advertising revenue and ultimately lower cash flow. In addition, to those described above, future operations are further subject to manythe following factors which could have an adverse effect upon our financial performance. These factors include:
  advertiser spending patterns, including the notion that orders are being placed in close proximity to air, limitingthe time such ads are broadcast, which could affect spending patterns and limit visibility of demand;demand for our products;
 
  the level of competition for advertising dollars, including by new entrants into the radio advertising sales market, including Google;dollars;
 
  new competitors or existing competitors with expanded resources, including as a result of consolidation (as described below), NAVTEQ’s purchase of Traffic.com or the proposed merger between XM Satellite Radioconsolidation; and Sirius Satellite Radio;

-10-


  lower than anticipated market acceptance of new or existing products;
technological changes and innovations;
fluctuations in programming costs;
shifts in population and other demographics;
changes in labor conditions; and
changes in governmental regulations and policies and actions of federal and state regulatory bodies.products.

- 10 -


Although we believe that our radio programming will be able to compete effectively and will continue to attract audiences and advertisers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively, regain our market share and increase or maintain or increase theour current audience ratings and advertising revenue. To the extent we experience a decline in audience for our programs or the cost of programming continues to increase (or in some cases cannot be reduced in connection with the new economic environment), we might be unable to retain the rights to popular programs and advertisers’ willingness to purchase our advertising could be further reduced.
Gores Radio Holdings, LLC exercises significant influence and control over our management and affairs.
In connection with the investment made by Gores, Gores is entitled to designate three (3) directors to our 11-person Board of Directors and nominate an independent director to the Board. Additionally, for as long as Gores holds 50% of the 7.50% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) issued to it on June 19, 2008 (as it does presently), we cannot take certain enumerated actions without Gores’ consent. Such actions include: issuing capital stock; merging or consolidating with another company on or prior to December 19, 2013; selling assets with a fair market value of $25,000 or more; increasing the size of the Board; adopting an annual budget or materially deviating from the approved budget, making capital expenditures in excess of $15,000; or amending our charter or bylaws. To the extent Gores and our management have different viewpoints regarding the desirability or efficacy of taking certain actions in the future, our ability to enact changes we may believe necessary or appropriate could be compromised and the operations of the business could be negatively affected. Shares owned by Gores currently represent approximately 32.7% of the voting power of the Company. Accordingly, Gores would exercise substantial influence on the outcome of most any matter submitted to a vote of our shareholders. The refinancing described elsewhere in this annual report contemplates that Gores will acquire a controlling interest in us and take control of the Board upon consummation of the refinancing.
Continued consolidation in the radio broadcast industry could adversely affect our operating results.
The radio broadcasting industry has continued to experience significant change, including as a result of a significant amount of consolidation in recent years, and increased business transactions by key players in the radio industry (e.g.,Clear Channel, Citadel, ABC and CBS Radio). In connection therewith, certain major station groups have: (1) modified overall amounts of commercial inventory broadcast on their radio stations,stations; (2) experienced significant declines in audienceaudience; and (3) increased their supply of shorter duration advertisements which is directly competitive to us. To the extent similar initiatives are adopted by other major station groups, this could adversely impact the amount of commercial inventory made available to us or increase the cost of such commercial inventory at the time of renewal of existing affiliate agreements. Additionally, if the size and financial resources of certain station groups continue to increase, the station groups may be able to develop their own programming as a substitute to that offered by us or, alternatively, they could seek to obtain programming from our competitors. Any such occurrences, or merely the threat of such occurrences, could adversely affect our ability to negotiate favorable terms with our station affiliates, to attract audiences and to attract advertisers, which could adversely affectadvertisers. If we do not succeed in these efforts, our operating results. In addition, changes in U.S. financial and equity markets, including market disruptions and significant interest rate fluctuations,results could impede our access to, or increase the cost of, external financing for our operations and investments.be adversely affected.
We may be required to recognize further impairment charges.
On an annual basis and upon the occurrence of certain events, we are required to perform impairment tests on our identified intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, which testing could impact the value of our business. SignificantAt December 31, 2008, we determined that our goodwill was impaired and unanticipatedrecorded an impairment charge of $224,073, which is in addition to the impairment change of $206,053 taken on June 30, 2008. The remaining book value of our goodwill at December 31, 2008 is $33,988. Unanticipated differences to our forecasted operational results and cash flows could require a provision for further impairment that could substantiallysignificantly affect our reported earnings in a period of such change. In addition since we operate in one segment, further declines in our stock price may also result in a future impairment charge.

- 11 -


Risks Relating to Our Common stockStock
Our stock priceWe have has been volatile, is likelydelisted from the New York Stock Exchange and do not have immediate plans to list on an alternate exchange.
Since November 24, 2008, our common stock ceased to be traded on the NYSE, which has affected the liquidity of our common stock. On March 16, 2009, we were delisted from the NYSE and at this time, we do not have any immediate plans to list on an alternate exchange such as Nasdaq or Amex, which means our common stock will continue to be volatile,lightly traded and could continue to decline.
The price of our Common stock has been, and is likely to continue toliquidity may be volatile. In addition,negatively affected for the stock market in general, and companies in the broadcasting space, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have been disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Broad market and industry factors may continue to negatively affect the market price of our Common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.
Our stock price may also continue to fluctuate significantly as a result of other factors, some or all of which are beyond our control, including:
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results;
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance or changes in financial estimates of securities analysts;
success or failure in our operating and growth strategies; and
realization of any of the risks described in these risk factors.

-11-


foreseeable future.
The foregoing list of factors that may affect future performance and the accuracy of forward-looking statements included in the factors above are illustrative, but by no means all-inclusive or exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
This item is not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
We own three buildings in Culver City, California: (1) a 10,000 square-foot building which contains administrative, sales and marketing; (2) a 10,000 square-foot building which contains our two traffic and news reporting divisions, MetroMetro/Traffic Networks and Shadow Broadcast Services; and (3) a 6,500 square-foot building which contains our production facilities. In addition, we lease operation centers/broadcast studios and marketing and administrative offices across the United States consisting of over 300,000290,000 square feet in the aggregate, pursuant to the terms of various lease agreements.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current level of operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On September 12, 2006, Mark Randall, derivatively on behalf of Westwood One, Inc., filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, against us and certain of our current and former directors and certain former executive officers. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment in connection with the granting of certain options to our former directors and executives. Plaintiff seeks judgment against the individual defendants in favor of us for an unstated amount of damages, disgorgement of the options which are the subject of the suit (and any proceeds from the exercise of those options and subsequent sale of the underlying stock) and equitable relief. Subsequently, on December 15, 2006, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint which asserts claims against certain of our former directors and executives who were not named in the initial complaint filed in September 2006 and dismisses claims against other former directors and executives named in the initial complaint. On March 2, 2007, we filed a motion to dismiss the suit. On April 23, 2007, Plaintiff filed its response to our motion to dismiss. On May 14, 2007, we filed our reply in furtherance of its motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. On August 3, 2007, the Court granted such motion to dismiss and denied Plaintiff’s request for leave to replead and file a further amended complaint. On September 20, 2007, Plaintiff appealed the Court’s dismissal of its complaint and moved for “renewal” under CPLR 2221(e). Oral argument on Plaintiff’s motion for renewal occurred on October 31, 2007. On April 22, 2008, Plaintiff withdrew its motion for renewal, without prejudice to renew.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.

 

-12-- 12 -


PART II
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
On January 31, 2008,February 24, 2009, there were approximately 300350 holders of record of our Commoncommon stock, several of which represent “street accounts” of securities brokers. Based upon the number of proxies requested by brokers in conjunction with our annual meeting of shareholders held on February 12, 2008,2009, we estimate that the total number of beneficial holders of our Commoncommon stock exceeds 9,500.6,800.
Since December 15, 1998, our Commoncommon stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WON”. The following table sets forth the range of high and low last sales prices on the NYSE for the Commoncommon stock for the calendar quarters indicated. On November 24, 2008 we were suspended from trading on the NYSE and on March 16, 2009 we were delisted.
         
2007 High  Low 
First Quarter $7.24  $6.15 
Second Quarter  8.16   6.48 
Third Quarter  7.17   2.32 
Fourth Quarter  3.00   1.83 
                
2006 High Low 
 High Low 
2008
 
First Quarter $16.58 $10.85  $2.16 $1.51 
Second Quarter 11.00 7.43  2.28 1.05 
Third Quarter 7.94 6.44  1.42 0.49 
Fourth Quarter 8.40 6.50  0.41 0.02 
 
2007
 
First Quarter $7.24 $6.17 
Second Quarter 8.16 6.48 
Third Quarter 7.17 2.32 
Fourth Quarter 3.00 1.83 
The last sales price for our Commoncommon stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2008February 27, 2009 was $1.58.
On February 2, 2006, April 18, 2006 and August 7, 2006, the Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $.10 per share for each issued and outstanding share of Common stock and $.08 per share for each issued and outstanding share of Class B stock. On November 7, 2006 and March 6, 2007, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.02 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Common stock and $0.016 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Class B stock.$0.06.
The payment of dividends is prohibited by the terms of our credit facility, as amended in 2008,Facility, and accordingly, we do not plan on paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
There is no established public trading market for our Class B Stock.stock. However, the Class B Stockstock is convertible to Commoncommon stock on a share-for-share basis. On January 31, 2008,February 28, 2009, there were two holders of record of our Class B Stock.stock.

 

-13-- 13 -


Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table contains information as of December 31, 20072008 regarding our equity compensation plans as well as regarding warrants issued to CBS Radio under the Management Agreement:plans.
                        
 Number of securities  Number of securities 
 remaining available for  remaining available for 
 future issuance under  Number of securities to be Weighted average future issuance under 
 Number of securities to be equity compensation  issued upon exercise of exercise price of equity compensation 
 issued upon exercise of Weighted average exercise plans excluding  outstanding options, outstanding options, plus excluding 
 outstanding options, price of outstanding options, securities reflected in  warrants and rights warrants and rights securities reflected in 
Plan Category warrants and rights warrants and rights Column (a)  (a) (b) Column (a) 
 (a) (b) (c)  (in thousands)     
 (in thousands) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders          
Options (1) 3,888 $21.86  (2) 7,000 $7.52  (3)
Warrants (3) 3,000 51.67 N/A 
Warrants (2) 10,000 6.00 N/A 
Restricted Stock Units 230 N/A  (2) 1,216 N/A  (3)
Restricted Stock 950 N/A  (2) 364 N/A  (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders        
      
 
Total 8,068  18,580 
      
(1) Options included herein were granted or are available for grant as part of our 1989 and 1999 stock option plans and/or 2005 Equity Compensation plan (the “2005 Plan”) that were approved by our shareholders. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves periodic option grants to executive officers and other employees based on their contributions to our operations. Among other things, the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for the granting of restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). A maximum of 9,200 shares of our Commoncommon stock is authorized for the issuance of awards under the 2005 Plan. Pursuant to the 2005 Plan beginning onsince May 19, 2005, the date of our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders, outside directors have automatically receivereceived a grant of RSUs equal to $100 in value on the date of each of our annual meeting of shareholders. In 2007, the Company did not hold an annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, the Company’s directors received their annual award of RSUs equal to $100 in value in July 2007, instead of February 12, 2008 when the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders was held. Any newly appointed outside director will receive an initial grant of RSUs equal to $150 in value on the date such director is appointed to our Board. Recipients of RSUs are entitled to receive dividend equivalents on the RSUs (subject to vesting) when and if we pay a cash dividend on our Commoncommon stock. RSUs awarded to outside directors vest over a three-year period in equal one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of the grant, subject to the director’s continued service with us. Directors’ RSUs vest automatically, in full, upon a change in control or upon their retirement, as defined in the 2005 Plan. RSUs are payable to outside directors in shares of our Commoncommon stock. For a more complete description of the provisions of the 2005 Plan, refer to our proxy statement in which the 2005 Plan and a summary thereof are included as exhibits, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2005.
 
(2) Warrants included herein were granted to Gores in conjunction with the Series A Preferred Stock. On June 19, 2008, we completed a $75,000 private placement of the Series A Preferred Stick with an initial conversion price of $3.00 per share and four-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,000 shares of our common stock in three approximately equal tranches with exercise prices of $5.00, $6.00 and $7.00 per share, respectively, to Gores Radio Holdings, LLC.
(3)A maximum of 9,200 shares of Commoncommon stock is authorized for issuance of equity compensation awards under the 2005 Plan. Options, RSUs and restricted stock are deducted from this authorized total, with grants of RSUs, restricted stock, and related dividend equivalents being deducted at the rate of three shares for every one share granted. At December 31, 2007, there were approximately 3,998 authorized shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2005 Plan and 4,382 shares remaining available for future issuance under the 1999 Plan.

-14-


(3)Warrants included herein were granted to CBS Radio in conjunction with the Management Agreement, and were approved by our shareholders on May 29, 2002. Of the seven warrants issued to CBS Radio, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000 shares of Common stock had an exercise price of $43.11 and $48.36, respectively, and were to become exercisable: (A) if the average price of our Common stock reaches a price of $64.67 and $77.38, respectively, for at least 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days for any period throughout the ten year term of the warrants or (B) upon our termination of the Management Agreement under certain circumstances as described in the terms of such warrants. Of the remaining five warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500 shares of Common stock, the exercise price for each of the five warrants was equal to $38.87, $44.70, $51.40, $59.11, and $67.98, respectively. The five warrants had a term of 10 years (only if they became exercisable) and became exercisable on January 2, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively. However, in order for the warrants to become exercisable, the average price of our Common stock for each of the 15 trading days prior to January 2 of such year (commencing on January 2, 2005 with respect to the first 500 warrant tranche and each January 2 thereafter for each of the remaining four warrants) had to be at least equal to both the exercise price of the warrant and 120% of the corresponding prior year 15 day trading average. In the case of the $38.87, $44.70, $51.40 and $59.11 warrants, our average stock price for the 15 trading days prior to January 2 of the respective year did not equal or exceed the required prices, and accordingly, they did not become exercisable. All warrants outstanding as of the closing date of the Master Agreement were cancelled.
The performance graph below compares the performance of our Commoncommon stock to the Dow Jones US Total Market Index and the Dow Jones US Media Index for the last five calendar years. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in our Commoncommon stock and each index on December 31, 2002.2003.

- 14 -


The following tables set forth the closing price of our Commoncommon stock at the end of each of the last five years.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Westwood One, Inc., The Dow Jones US Index
And The Dow Jones US Media Index
*$100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
                                        
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 
Westwood One, Inc.
 91.57 72.08 44.32 19.90 5.63  78.72 48.40 21.73 6.14 0.17 
Dow Jones US Total Market Index
 130.75 146.45 155.72 179.96 190.77  112.01 119.10 137.64 145.91 91.69 
Dow Jones US Media Industry Index
 131.32 133.52 118.20 149.46 130.63  101.68 90.01 113.82 99.47 58.55 
Westwood One Closing Stock Price
 $34.21 $26.93 $16.30 $7.06 $1.99  26.93 16.30 7.06 1.99 0.06 

 

-15-- 15 -


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
                 
              Approximate Dollar 
          Total Number of  Value of Shares that 
          Shares Purchased as  May Yet Be Purchased 
          Part of Publicly  Under the Plans or 
  Number of Shares  Average Price Paid  Announced Plans or  Programs 
Period Purchased in Period  Per Share  Programs  (A) (B) 
10/1/07 – 10/31/07  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
11/1/07 – 11/30/07  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
12/1/07 – 12/31/07  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
 
                 
              Approximate Dollar 
          Total Number of  Value of Shares that 
          Shares Purchased as  May Yet Be Purchased 
          Part of Publicly  Under the Plans or 
  Number of Shares  Average Price Paid  Announced Plans or  Program 
Period Purchased in Period  Per Share  Programs  (A) (B) 
                 
10/1/08 – 10/31/08  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
11/1/08 – 11/30/08  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
12/1/08 – 12/31/08  0   n/a   21,001  $290,490 
(A) Represents remaining authorization from the additional $250,000 repurchase authorization approved on February 24, 2004 and the additional $300,000 authorization approved on April 29, 2005. Our existing stock purchase program was publicly announced on September 23, 1999.
 
(B) Our Board of Directors has suspended all future stock repurchases under the aforementioned plans for the foreseeable future.
On January 3, 2008, 2 shares of Companyour common stock were withheld from the vested portion of a 2006 equity compensation award to Peter Kosann our then Chief Executive Officer, in order to satisfy taxes payable by Mr. Kosann in connection with the 10 shares of such award that vested on January 3, 2008. On such date, the closing stock price of our common stock was $1.94 per share.

- 16 -


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
                     
(In thousands except per share data) 2007  2006  2005 (1)  2004(1)  2003 (1) 
OPERATING RESULTS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31:
                    
Net Revenue $451,384  $512,085  $557,830  $562,246  $539,226 
                     
Operating and Corporate Costs, Excluding Depreciation and Amortization, Goodwill Impairment and Special Changes  363,611   409,814   393,026   392,693   371,206 
                     
Goodwill Impairment     515,916          
                     
Depreciation and Amortization  19,840   20,756   20,826   18,429   11,513 
                     
Special Changes  4,626   1,579          
                     
Operating (Loss) Income  63,307   (435,980)  143,978   151,124   156,507 
                     
Net (Loss) Income $24,368  $(469,453) $77,886  $86,955  $91,983 
                     
(Loss) Income Per Basic Share                    
Common stock $0.28  $(5.46) $0.86  $0.90  $0.91 

-16-


                     
(In thousands except per share data) 2007  2006  2005 (1)  2004(1)  2003 (1) 
Class B stock $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $  $ 
(Loss) Income Per Diluted Share                    
Common stock $0.28  $(5.46) $0.85  $0.88  $0.86 
Class B stock $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $  $ 
                     
Dividends Declared                    
Common stock $0.02  $0.32  $0.30  $  $ 
Class B stock $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $  $ 
BALANCE SHEET DATA AT DECEMBER 31:
                    
Current Assets $138,154  $149,222  $172,245  $174,346  $165,495 
Working Capital  47,294   29,313   72,094   93,005   86,484 
Total Assets  669,757   696,701   1,239,646   1,262,495   1,280,737 
Long-Term Debt  345,244   366,860   427,514   359,439   300,366 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  227,631   202,931   704,029   800,709   859,704 
 
(In thousands except per share data)
                     
  2008  2007  2006  2005(1)  2004(1) 
                     
OPERATING RESULTS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31:
                    
                     
Revenue $404,416  $451,384  $512,085  $557,830  $562,246 
                     
Operating and Corporate Costs, Excluding Depreciation and Amortization, Goodwill Impairment and Special Changes  373,934   363,611   409,814   393,026   392,693 
                     
Goodwill Impairment  430,126      515,916       
                     
Depreciation and Amortization  11,052   19,840   20,756   20,826   18,429 
                     
Restructuring Charges  14,100             
                     
Special Charges  13,245   4,626   1,579       
                     
Operating (Loss) Income  (438,041)  63,307   (435,980)  143,978   151,124 
                     
Net (Loss) Income  (427,563)  24,368   (469,453)  77,886   86,955 
                     
(Loss) Income Per Basic Share                    
Common stock $(4.39) $0.28  $(5.46) $0.86  $0.90 
Class B stock $  $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $ 
                     
(Loss) Income Per Diluted Share                    
Common stock $(4.39) $0.28  $(5.46) $0.85  $0.88 
Class B stock $  $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $ 
                     
Dividends Declared (2)                    
Common stock $  $0.02  $0.32  $0.30  $ 
Class B stock $  $0.02  $0.26  $0.24  $ 
                     
BALANCE SHEET DATA AT DECEMBER 31:
                    
Current Assets $119,468  $138,154  $149,222  $172,245  $174,346 
Working Capital / (Deficit) (3)  (208,034)  47,294   29,313   72,094   93,005 
Total Assets  205,088   669,757   696,701   1,239,646   1,262,495 
Long-Term Debt (3)     345,244   366,860   427,514   359,439 
Total Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity  (203,145)  227,631   202,931   704,029   800,709 
 
(1) Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) utilizing the modified retrospective transition alternative. Accordingly, results for years prior to 2006 have been restated to reflect stock basedstock-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123R.
 
(2) No cash dividend was paid on our Commoncommon stock or Class B stock during 2003 and 2004.in 2004 or 2008. In 2005, our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.10 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Commoncommon stock and $0.08 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Class B stock on each of April 29, 2005, August 3, 2005 and November 2, 2005. In 2006, our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.10 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Commoncommon stock and $0.08 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Class B stock on each of February 2, 2006, April 18, 2006 and August 7, 2006. Our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.02 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Commoncommon stock and $0.016 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Class B stock on November 7, 2006. Our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.02 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Common Stockcommon stock and $0.016 per share for every issued and outstanding share of Class B stock on March 6, 2007. The payment of dividends is prohibited by the terms of our credit facility, as amended in 2008,Facility, and accordingly, we do not plan on paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
(3)On November 30, 2008, we failed to make the interest payment on our outstanding indebtedness which constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. Accordingly, $249,053 of debt previously considered long-term has been re-classified as short-term debt, which decreased working capital from $41,019 to ($208,034).

 

-17-- 17 -


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(in thousands except for share and per share amounts)
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Westwood One is a provider of analog and digital content, including news, sports, weather, traffic, video newsprogramming, information services and other informationcontent to the radio, TV and on-line industries.digital sectors. We are one of the largest domestic outsourceoutsourced providers of traffic reporting services and one of the nation’s largest radio networks, producing and distributing national news, sports, music, talk music and special evententertainment programs, features and live events, in addition to local news, sports, weather, video news and other information programming. We deliver our content to over 5,000 radio and television stations in the U.S. The commercial airtime that we sell to our advertisers is acquired from radio and television affiliates in exchange for our programming, content, information, and in certain circumstances, cash compensation.
In November 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors established a Strategic Review Committee comprised of independent directors to evaluate means by which we might be able to enhance shareholder value. The Committee’s principal task was to modify and extend our various agreements with CBS Radio and its affiliates, including the Management Agreement and programming and distribution agreements with CBS Radio. On October 2, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with CBS Radio (the Master Agreement) documenting a long-term arrangement through March 31, 2017. As part of the new arrangement which was approved by our shareholders on February 12, 2008, certain CBS Radio stations will broadcast our local/regional and national commercial inventory through March 31, 2017 in exchange for certain programming and/or cash compensation. As part of the new arrangement, the News Programming Agreement, the Technical Services Agreement and the Trademark License Agreement were amended and extended through March 31, 2017. The new arrangement became effective on March 3, 2008.
The new arrangement with CBS Radio is particularly important to us, as in recent years, the radio broadcasting industry has experienced a significant amount of consolidation. As a result, certain major radio station groups, including Clear Channel Communications and CBS Radio, have emerged as powerful forces in the industry. While we provide programming to all major radio station groups, our extended affiliation agreements with most of CBS Radio’s owned and operated radio stations provides us with a significant portion of the audience that we sell to advertisers.
We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of :10 second, :15 second, :30 second and :60 second commercial airtime to advertisers. Our advertisers who target local/regional audiences generally find the most effective method is to purchase shorter duration :10 second advertisements, which are principally correlated to traffic and information related programming and content. Our advertisers who target national audiences generally find the most cost effective method is to purchase longer :30 or :60 second advertisements, which are principally correlated to news, talk, sports and music and entertainment related programming and content. A growing number of advertisers purchase both local/regional and national airtime. Our goal is to maximize the yield of our available commercial airtime to optimize revenue.
In managing our business, we develop programming and exploit our commercial airtime by concurrently taking into consideration the demands of our advertisers on both a market specific and national basis, the demandsinputs of the owners and management of our radio station affiliates, and the demandsinputs of our programming partners and talent. Our continued success and prospects for growth are dependent upon our ability to manage these factors in a cost effective manner and to adapt our information and entertainment programming to different distribution platforms. Our results may also be impacted by overall economic conditions, trends in demand for radio related advertising, competition, and risks inherent in our customer base, including customer attrition and our ability to generate new business opportunities to offset any attrition.

-18-


There are a variety of factors that influence our revenue on a periodic basis including but not limited to: (i)(1) economic conditions and the relative strength or weakness in the United States economy; (ii)(2) advertiser spending patterns and the timing of the broadcasting of our programming, principally the seasonal nature of sports programming; (iii)(3) advertiser demand on a local/regional or national basis for radio related advertising products; (iv)(4) increases or decreases in our portfolio of program offerings and related audiences, including changes in the demographic composition of our audience base; (v)(5) increases or decreases in the size of our advertiser sales force; and (vi)(6) competitive and alternative programs and advertising mediums, including, but not limited to, radio.
Our ability to specifically isolate the relative historical aggregate impact of price and volume is not practical as commercial airtime is sold and managed on an order-by-order basis. It should be noted, however, that we closely monitor advertiser commitments for the current calendar year, with particular emphasis placed on a prospective three-month period. We take the following factors, among others, into account when pricing commercial airtime: (i) the dollar value, length and breadth of the order; (ii) the desired reach and audience demographic; (iii) the quantity of commercial airtime available for the desired demographic requested by the advertiser for sale at the time their order is negotiated; and (iv) the proximity of the date of the order placement to the desired broadcast date of the commercial airtime. Our commercial airtime is perishable, and accordingly, our revenue is significantly impacted by the commercial airtime available at the time we enter into an arrangement with an advertiser. Our ability to specifically isolate the relative historical aggregate impact of price and volume is not practical as commercial airtime is sold and managed on an order-by-order basis. We closely monitor advertiser commitments for the current calendar year, with particular emphasis placed on the annual upfront process and a prospective three-month period. We take the following factors, among others, into account when pricing commercial airtime: (1) the dollar value, length and breadth of the order; (2) the desired reach and audience demographic; (3) the quantity of commercial airtime available for the desired demographic requested by the advertiser for sale at the time their order is negotiated; and (4) the proximity of the date of the order placement to the desired broadcast date of the commercial airtime
Our national revenue has been trending downward for the last several years due principally to reductions in national audience levels as part of planned cost reductions and lower clearance and audience levels of our affiliated stations. Our local/regional revenue has been trending downward due principally to increased competition, reductions in our local/regional sales force, combined with an increase in the amount of :10 second inventory being sold by radio stations. Recently, our operating performance has also been affected by the weakness in the United States economy and advertiser demand for radio related advertising products.

- 18 -


The principal components of our operating expenses are programming, production and distribution costs (including affiliate compensation and broadcast rights fees), selling expenses including commissions, promotional expenses and bad debt expenses, depreciation and amortization, and corporate general and administrative expenses. Corporate general and administrative expenses are primarily comprised of costs associated with the Management Agreement (which terminated on March 3, 2008), corporate accounting, legal and administrative personnel costs, and other administrative expenses, including those associated with corporate governance matters. Special charges include one-time expenses associated with the renegotiation of the CBS agreements, the Gores investment, re-financing costs and severance associated with senior management changes (i.e. our CEO and CFO).re-engineering expenses.
We consider our operating cost structure to be predominatelylargely fixed in nature, and as a result, we believe we need several months lead time to make significant modification to our cost structure to react to what we view are more than temporary increases or decreases in advertiser demand. This point isbecomes important in predicting our performance in periods when advertiser revenue is increasing or decreasing. In periods where advertiser revenue is increasing, the fixed nature of a substantial portion of our costs means that operating income will grow faster than the related growth in revenue. Conversely, in a period of declining revenue, operating income will decrease by a greater percentage than the decline in revenue because of the lead time needed to reduce our operating cost structure. Furthermore, ifIf we perceive a decline in revenue to be temporary, we may choose not to reduce our fixed costs, or may even increase our fixed costs, so as to not limit our future growth potential when the advertising marketplace rebounds. We carefully consider matters such as credit and commercial inventory risks, among others, in assessing arrangements with our programming and distribution partners. In those circumstances where we function as the principal in the transaction, the revenue and associated operating costs are presented on a gross basis in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In those circumstances where we function as an agent or sales representative, our effective commission is presented within revenue with no corresponding operating expenses. Although no individual relationship is significant, you should consider the relative mix of such arrangements is significant when evaluating operating margin and/or increases and decreases in operating expenses.
We engaged consultants for the most part to assist us in determining the most cost effective manner to gather and disseminate traffic information to our constituents. As a result, we announced a Metro/Traffic re-engineering initiative that was implemented in the last half of 2008. We expect to incur ongoing costs related to this re-engineering initiative and accordingly recorded charges of $10,598 in the third quarter and $3,502 in the fourth quarter of 2008, respectively.
On October 2, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with CBS Radio documenting a long-term arrangement through March 31, 2017. As part of the new arrangement which was approved by our shareholders on February 12, 2008, closed on March 3, 2008,CBS Radio agreed to broadcast certain of our commercial inventory for our Network and Metro/Traffic and information division through March 31, 2017 in exchange for certain programming and/or cash compensation. If CBS Radio chooses to divest its radio stations to third parties, with certain exceptions CBS Radio is required to assign such station’s agreements to the new owner or air our commercial inventory on a comparable station they continue to own. As part of the new arrangement, certain existing agreements between us and CBS Radio, including the News Programming Agreement, the Technical Services Agreement and the Trademark License Agreement were amended and restated and extended through March 31, 2017. Under the new arrangement, CBS Radio agreed to assign to us all of its right, title and interest in and to the warrants to purchase common stock outstanding under prior agreements. These warrants were cancelled and retired on March 3, 2008.
The new arrangement with CBS Radio is particularly important to us, as in recent years, the radio broadcasting industry has experienced a significant amount of consolidation. As a result, certain major radio station groups, including Clear Channel Communications and CBS Radio, have emerged as powerful forces in the industry. While we provide programming to all major radio station groups, our extended affiliation agreements with most of CBS Radio’s owned and operated radio stations provide us with a significant portion of the audience that we sell to advertisers.

- 19 -


When CBS Radio discontinued Howard Stern’s radio program in 2006, the audience delivered by the stationsaffiliates that used to broadcast the program declined significantly. SomeMany of our affiliation agreements with CBS Radio did not allow us to reduce the compensation those stations were paid as a result of delivering a lower audience. Additionally, certain CBS Radio stations broadcast fewer commercials than in prior periods. These items contributed to a significant decline in our national audience delivery to advertisers. Our new arrangement with CBS (which became effective on March 3, 2008), mitigates both of these circumstances going forward by adjusting affiliate compensation up and/or down as a result of changes in audience levels. In addition, the arrangement provides CBS Radio with financial incentives to clearbroadcast substantially all of our commercial inventory (referred to as “clearance”) in accordance with their contract terms and with significant penalties for not complying with the contractual terms of our arrangement. We believe that CBS Radio has taken and will continue to take the necessary steps to stabilize and increase the audience reached by its stations. It should be noted however, that even as CBS takes steps to increase its compliance with our affiliation agreements, our operating costs will increase before we will be able to increase prices for the larger audience we will deliver, which was and may result incontinue to be a short-termcontribution to the decline in our operating income.

-19-


Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Revenue
We established a new organizational structure in 2008 pursuant to which we manage and report our business in two operating segments: Network and Metro/Traffic. Our Network Division produces and distributes regularly scheduled and special syndicated programs, including exclusive live concerts, music and interview shows, national music countdowns, lifestyle short features, news broadcasts, talk programs, sporting events and sports features. Our Metro/Traffic Division provides traffic reports and local news, weather and sports information programming to radio and television affiliates and their websites. We evaluate segment performance based on segment revenue and segment operating (loss)/income. Administrative functions such as finance, human resources and information systems are centralized. However, where applicable, portions of the administrative function costs are allocated between the operating segments. The operating segments do not share programming or report distribution. Operating costs are captured discretely within each segment. Our accounts receivable and property, plant and equipment are captured and reported discretely within each operating segment.
Revenue presented by type of commercial advertisementoperating segment is as follows for the years ending December 31:
                         
  2007  2006  2005 
  $  % of Total  $  % of Total  $  % of Total 
Local/Regional $232,446   51% $265,768   52% $300,560   54%
National  218,938   49%  246,317   48%  257,270   46%
                   
Total (1) $451,384   100% $512,085   100% $557,830   100%
                   
 
                         
  2008  2007  2006 
  $  % of Total  $  % of Total  $  % of Total 
                         
Metro $194,884   48% $232,446   51% $265,768   52%
Network  209,532   52%  218,938   49%  246,317   48%
                   
Total (1) $404,416   100% $451,384   100% $512,085   100%
                   
(1) As described above, we currently aggregate revenue data based on the type of commercial airtime sold. You should consider that aoperating segment. A number of advertisers purchase both local/regional and national commercial airtime when evaluating the relative revenue generated on a local/regional versus national basis.in both segments. Our objective is to optimize total revenue from those advertisers.
RevenueFor the year ended December 31, 2008 (“2008”) revenue decreased $46,968, or 10.4%, from $451,384 to $404,416 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“2007”) revenue decreased $60,701, or 11.9%, to $451,384 from $512,085 for the year ended December 31, 2006 (“2006”), and decreased $45,745, or 8.2%, from $557,830 for the year ended December 31, 2005 (“2005”). The decreases weredecrease in 2008 was principally attributable to the current economic downturn. Revenue in 2008 and 2007 was also affected by increased competition, lower audience levels and a reduction in our sales force and increased competition.force.
Local/RegionalFor 2008 Metro/Traffic revenue decreased to $194,884, a decline of 16.2%, from $232,446 in 2007 decreased $33,322, or 12.5%, to $232,446 fromand $265,768 in 2006, a decline of 12.5%. The 2008 decrease is primarily due to the current economic downturn, a weak local advertising marketplace primarily in the automotive, financial services and decreased $34,792, or 11.6%,retail categories, increased competition and a continued reduction in 2006 from $300,560 in 2005.:10 second inventory units available to sell. The 2007 decrease was principally attributable to a 15% reduction in our sales force from 2006, a reduction in :10 second inventory units to sell as a result of the closure of several second-tier traffic markets in mid to late 2006 and canceling several representation and affiliation agreements (representing an approximately 18% decrease in inventory units from June 30, 2006 to December 31, 2007), and increased :10 second inventory being sold by radio stations. The decrease in 2006 was principally attributable to reduced demand for our :10 second commercial airtime, increased competition, and a 23% reduction in our sales force. The reduced demand was experienced in virtually allmost markets and all advertiser categories.

- 20 -


National
For 2008 Network revenue inwas $209,532, compared to $218,938 for 2007, decreased $27,379, or 11.1%, to $218,938a 4.3% decline, and from $246,317 in 2006, a decline of 11.1%. The decline in 2008 is primarily the result of the general decline in advertising spending, which started to contract mid-year and decreased $10,953, or 4.3%, in 2006which accelerated during the fourth quarter of 2008. Our performance was also impacted by lower revenues from $257,270 in 2005.our RADAR inventory and lower barter revenue. The decrease in 2007 nationalNetwork revenue was principally attributable to an approximate 23% reduction in our quarterly gross impressions from RADAR rated network inventory (news programming inventory) resultingwhich resulted from our affiliates experiencing audience declines, lower clearance levels by certain CBS Radio stations and planned reductions in affiliate compensation, the cancellation of certain programs (approximately $5,500), and the non-recurrence of revenue attributable to the 2006 Winter Olympic games (approximately $5,700), partially offset by revenue generated from new program launches (approximately $6,000). Excluding the effect of the non-recurrence of revenue attributable to the 2006 Winter Olympics, national revenue would have declined approximately 8.9%. The decrease in 2006 was primarily a result of decreases in revenue attributable to news, talk and music programming, partially offset by non-recurring revenue attributable to the broadcast of the 2006 Winter Olympic games and higher revenue from sports programs (approximately $6,900). Excluding the effect of the revenue from the 2006 Winter Olympics, national revenue in 2006 would have decreased approximately 6.6%.
We expect our revenue for the year ending December 31, 2008 (“2008”) to increase compared with 2007, primarily as a result of launching new programs, making select investments to increase our RADAR audiences, investing in a new distribution system that will allow us to split advertiser commercial copy, and the hiring of additional sales persons and management personnel.

-20-


Expenses
Operating costs
Operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 were as follows:
                                                
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 $ % of total $ % of total $ % of total  $ % of Total $ % of Total $ % of Total 
Programming, production and distribution expenses $274,645  78% $301,562  76% $279,364  73% $293,740  81% $274,645  78% $301,562  76%
Selling expenses 34,237  10% 46,814  12% 52,089  14% 34,343  10% 34,237  10% 46,814  12%
Stock-based compensation 5,386  2% 6,345  2% 6,721  2% 5,443  2% 5,386  2% 6,345  2%
Other operating expenses 36,172  10% 40,475  10% 40,824  11% 26,966  7% 36,172  10% 40,475  10%
                          
 $350,440  100% $395.196  100% $378,998  100% $360,492  100% $350,440  100% $395,196  100%
                          
Operating costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 increased $10,052, or 2.9%, to $360,492 from $350,440 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 due to increased station compensation and salary costs, which were partially offset by the elimination of management fees as a result of the new CBS arrangement. Operating costs in 2007 decreased $44,756, or 11.3%, to $350,440 from $395,196 in 2006,2006.
Expenses for programming, production and increased $16,198, or 4.3%,distribution were $293,740 for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $19,095 from $274,645 for the same period ending December 31, 2007. The increase relates to an increase in 2006 from $378,998 in 2005.station compensation costs primarily related to the CBS arrangement. Programming, production and distribution expenses in 2007 decreased $26,917 or 8.9% to $274,645 from $301,562 in 2006 and increased $22,198 or 7.9% in 2006 from $279,364 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease is principally attributable to the cancellation of certain programming contracts (approximately $15,000), the non-recurrence of costs associated with the 2006 Winter Olympics and lower payroll and rent costs associated with closing certain traffic information gathering marketsoperation centers (approximately $9,000). The 2006 increase
Selling expenses in programming, production and distribution expenses are principally attributable2008 remained relatively flat at $34,343 as compared to increases$34,237 in existing and new program offerings, and as a result of costs associated with the 2006 Winter Olympics.
2007. Selling expenses in 2007 decreased $12,577, or 26.9%, to $34,237 from $46,814 in 2006 and decreased $5,275, or 10.1%, in 2006 from $52,089 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease was principally attributable to a reduction in sales staff and commissions ($7,800)$(7,800) and a decrease in bad debt expense of approximately ($2,200)$(2,200).
Other operating expenses in 2008 declined by $9,206, or 25.5%, to $26,966 from $36,172 in 2007, the majority of which is the elimination of the CBS management fee. The 2006 decrease was principally attributablein other operating expenses also reflects the Metro/Traffic re-engineering program and other cost reductions, which led to a reductiondeclines in sales staffMetro/Traffic-related personnel, facilities and commissions.
aviation costs. Other operating expenses in 2007 decreased $4,303, or 10.6%, to $36,172 from $40,475 in 2006 and decreased $349, or 0.9%, in 2006 from $40,824 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease was principally attributable to reduction in personnel costs.

- 21 -


We currently anticipate that operating costs will increase in 2008 compared with 2007 due to increased clearance levels by CBS Radio as part of the new arrangement that became effective March 3, 2008, additional investments in new program offerings, increasing RADAR audience levels, hiring additional sales and management personnel, and increases in personnel compensation.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization in 2008 decreased $8,788, or 44.3%, to $11,052 primarily as a result of the cancellation of the CBS warrants. In 2007, depreciation and amortization decreased $916, or 4.4%, to $19,840 from $20,756 in 2006, and decreased nominally in 2006 from $20,826 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease is principally attributable to certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
We anticipate that depreciationCorporate General and amortization will decreaseAdministrative Expenses
Corporate general and administrative expenses in 2008 compared withincreased slightly to $13,442 from $13,171 in 2007, a $271, or 2.1%, increase. The increase reflects an increase in salary and wages and stock-based compensation offset by a reduction in legal fees and the CBS management fee. In 2007, corporate general and administrative expenses decreased $1,447, or 9.9%, to $13,171 from $14,618 in 2006. The 2007 decrease was principally as a result of canceling the warrants issuedattributable to CBS Radio as part of the Management Agreement.reduced stock-based compensation and lower corporate governance costs, partially offset by increased personnel costs.
Goodwill Impairment
On an annual basis and upon the occurrence of certain interim triggering events, we are required to perform impairment tests on our identified intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, which testing could impact the value of our business.
Prior to 2008, we operated as a single reportable operating segment: the sale of commercial airtime. As part of our re-engineering initiative, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we installed separate management for the Network and Metro/Traffic divisions providing discrete financial information and management oversight. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”), we have determined that each division is an operating segment. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business which is one level below the operating segment. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments and impairment has been tested at this level.
We employ an independent firm specializing in valuation services to assist us in determining the fair value of the reporting units and goodwill. In connection with the 2008 testing, we have determined that using a discounted cash flow model was the best calculation of our fair value. In prior periods, the fair value was calculated on a consistently applied weighted average basis using a discounted cash flow model and the quoted market price of our common stock.
In 2008, we determined that our goodwill was impaired and recorded impairment charges totaling $430,126 ($206,053 in the second quarter and $224,073 in the fourth quarter). The remaining value of our goodwill is $33,988.
In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing for 2007, we determined our goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2007. The conclusion that our fair value was greater than our carrying value at December 31, 2007 was based upon management’s best estimates including a valuation study that was prepared by an independent firm specializing in valuation services using our operational forecasts. The fair value was calculated on a consistently applied weighted average basis using a discounted cash flow model and the quoted market price of our Common stock. While the analysis at December 31, 2007, on a weighted average basis indicates no impairment, the value based solely on the quoted market price of our Common stock, without consideration of a control premium, was less than our carrying value. While not an element of our valuation approach, we believe that application of a control premium to our quoted market stock value would further support the absence of an impairment. If actual results differ from our operational forecasts, or if the discount rate used in our calculation increases, or if our stock price continues to decline, an impairment may be required to be recorded in the future.

-21-


In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing for 2006, based on a similar approach as applied in 2007, we determined our goodwill was impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of $515,916. The goodwill impairment, the majority of which was not deductible for income tax purposes, was primarily due to our declining operating performance and the reduced valuation multiples in the radio industry. If actual results differ from our operational forecasts, or if the discount rate used in our calculation increases, an impairment may be required to be recorded in the future.

- 22 -


Corporate General and Administrative ExpensesRestructuring Charges
Corporate generalIn connection with the re-engineering of our traffic operations and administrative expensesother cost reductions, which included the consolidation of leased offices, staff reductions and the elimination of underperforming programming, and was implemented to a significant degree in 2007 decreased $1,447, or 9.9%, to $13,171 from $14,618the last half of 2008, we recorded $14,100 in 2006, and increased $590, or 4.2%, in 2006 from $14,028 in 2005. Exclusive of stock-based compensation expense of $4,220, $5,924, and $4,965 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, corporate general and administrative expenses in 2007 increased $257, or 3%, to $8,951 from $8,694 in 2006, and decreased $369, or 4.1%, in 2006 from $9,063 in 2005. The 2007 increase was principally attributable to increased personnel costs, partially offset by lower corporate governance costs. The 2006 decrease was primarily attributable to lower personnel costs slightly offset by higher compensation to CBS Radio.
restructuring charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. We anticipate further charges of approximately $9,700 as additional phases of the original traffic re-engineering and other programs are implemented and finalized in the second quarter of 2009. The total restructuring charges for the traffic re-engineering and other cost savings programs are projected to be approximately $23,800. In addition, we have introduced and will complete new cost reduction programs in 2009. As these programs are implemented, we anticipate that corporate generalwe will incur new incremental costs for severance of approximately $6,000 and administrative expenses in 2008contract terminations of $3,100. In total, we estimate we will increase as a resultrecord aggregate restructuring charges of planned staffing increases.approximately $32,900, consisting of: (1) $15,500 of severance, relocation and other employee related costs; (2) $7,400 of facility consolidation and related costs; and (3) $10,000 of contract termination costs.
Special Charges
We incurred costs aggregating $13,245, $4,626 and $1,579 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,respectively. Special charges for 2008 were primarily related to a $5,000 payment to CBS Radio as a result of the new arrangement with CBS Radio, legal and advisor costs associated with the new arrangement, consulting costs attributable to our Metro/Traffic re-engineering initiative, re-financing transaction costs and costs related to the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock to Gores. The 2007 and 2006 charges relate to the negotiation of a new long-term arrangement with CBS Radio and for severance obligations related to executive officer changes.
Operating Income (Loss)
We incurred an operating loss of $(438,041) in 2008. Absent the goodwill impairment charge of $430,126, we incurred an operating loss of $(7,915) in 2008 as compared to operating income of $63,307 in 2007, a decline of $71,222. The decline for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 reflects a $46,968 decrease in revenue and an increase in costs due to restructuring charges for the closedown of facilities in connection with the Metro/Traffic re-engineering initiative, accrued severance payments, increased personnel costs and costs associated with the new CBS agreement. Operating income in 2007 increased $499,287 to $63,307 from an operating loss of ($435,980)$(435,980) in 2006, and decreased $579,958 in 2006 from operating income of $143,978 in 2005.2006. Excluding the 2006 impairment charge, operating income in 2007 decreased $16,629, or 20.8%, to $63,307 from $79,936 in 2006, and decreased $64,042, or 44.5% in 2006 from $143,978 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease was attributable to lower revenue, partially offset by a reduction in operating costs. The 2006 decrease was principally attributable to lower revenue and higher operating costs.
We currently anticipate that operating income will increase in 2008 compared to 2007 principally as a result of lower depreciation and amortization and special charges.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in 2008 decreased $6,975 from $23,626 in 2007 to $16,651 in 2008 reflecting the decrease in the amount of outstanding debt. Interest expense in 2007 decreased $1,964, or 7.7%, to $23,626 from $25,590 in 2006, and increased $7,275, or 39.7%, in 2006 from $18,315 in 2005.2006. The 2007 decrease was principally attributable to lower average borrowings under our credit facility andFacility, partially offset by an increase in interest rates, higher amortization of deferred debt costs as a result of amending the facilityFacility in 2006, and a payment to terminate one of our fixed to floating interest rate swap agreements on our $150,000 Note. Our weighted average interest rate was 6.5% in 2008 and 6.3% in 2007 compared with 5.9% in 2006. The increase in 2006 was attributable to higher outstanding borrowings under our credit facility and higher average interest rates, as our average interest rate increased to 5.9% from 4.3% in 2005.2007.
In January and February 2008, we amended our credit facilityFacility to increase our leverage ratio and eliminate a provision that deemed the termination of the CBS Radio management agreement an event of default. As a result, our interest rate under the amended agreement for the Facility was increased to LIBOR + 175 basis points from LIBOR + 125 basis points. Additionally, sinceIf the refinancing is completed, we anticipate that annual interest payments on our credit facility matures at the end of February 2009, wedebt will needincrease from approximately $12,000 to refinance the credit facility prior to such date. Based on the significant reduction in our Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (referred to as EBITDA) over the past two years, we expect our interest rate to further increase as part of any new debt arrangement.$19,000.

-22-


Other Income
Other income was $12,369, $411, and $926 in 2008, 2007, and $1,440 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Other income in 2008 was principally due to a gain of $12,420 on the sale of securities in the third quarter and in 2007, was principally attributable to interest earned on our invested cash balances. In 2006, in addition to interest income, we received $529 in connection with a recapitalization transaction of our investee, POP Radio, LP (“POP Radio”). In 2005, we sold a building in Culver City, California, recognizing a pre-tax gain on sale of $1,022.

- 23 -


Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax expense in 2008 decreased $30,484, or 193.9%, to $(14,760) from $15,724 in 2007, the result of a portion of the goodwill impairment charge recorded during the year being tax deductible. Income tax expense in 2007 increased $6,915, or 78.5%, to $15,724 from $8,809 in 2006, and decreased $40,408, or 82.1%, in 2006 from $49,217 in 2005.2006. In 2007,2008, our effective income tax rate was 39.2%3.3%. The effective 2008 income tax rate was impacted by the 2008 goodwill impairment charge being substantially non-deductible for tax purposes. The 2007 effective income tax rate benefited from a change in New York State tax law on our deferred tax balance (approximately $100). The 2006 income tax provision was impacted by the 2006 goodwill impairment and related deferred tax attributes. Our effective tax rate in 2005 was 38.7%.
We expect our effective income tax rate in 2008 to be approximately 39%.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income in 2007 increased $493,8212008 decreased $451,931 to a loss of $(427,563) $(4.39) per basic common share and $(4.39) per diluted common share, from net income of $24,368 ($0.28 per basic and diluted common share and $0.02 per basic and diluted Class B share) fromin 2007. This compares with a net loss of $(469,453) ($469,453) (($5.46)(5.46) per basic and diluted Commoncommon share and $0.26$(0.26) per basic and diluted Class B share) in 2006, and decreased $547,339 in 2006 from net income of $77,886 ($0.86 per basic Common share and $0.85 per diluted Common share and $0.24 per basic and diluted Class B share) in 2005.2006.
Weighted-Average Shares
Weighted-average shares outstanding for purposes of computing basic net income (loss) per Commoncommon share were 98,015, 86,112, and 86,013 in 2008, 2007 and 90,714 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The decrease in 2006 from 2005 was primarily attributable to Common Stock repurchases partially offset by additional share issuances as a result of stock option exercises. Weighted-average shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted net income (loss) per Commoncommon share were 98,307, 86,426, and 86,013 in 2008, 2007, and 91,519 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. As a result of incurring a net loss in 2008 and 2006, basis and diluted weighted-average Common shares outstanding are equivalent, as common stock equivalents from stock options, unvested restricted stock and warrants would be anti-dilutive.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We continually monitor and project our anticipated cash requirements, which include working capital needs, capital expenditures and principal and interest payments on our indebtedness and potential acquisitions. Our recentExcept for the non-payment of our interest and debt maturity described below, our funding requirements have been financed through cash flow from operations, the issuance of long-term debt and the issuance of long-term debt.$100,000 of common stock and Series A Preferred Stock to Gores in March and June of 2008, respectively.
At December 31, 2007,2008, our principal sources of liquidity were our cash and cash equivalents of $6,187$6,437 and available borrowings under our bank credit facility.Facility. As previously disclosed and as discussed elsewhere in this report, on February 27, 2009, our outstanding indebtedness under our Facility, which totals approximately $41,000, matured and became due and payable in its entirety. Additionally, we did not make our most recent interest payment to our noteholders on November 30, 2008. The non-payment of such amounts constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes, respectively. We believe thatare presently unable to meet our outstanding debt obligations, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Absent negotiating and executing definitive documentation with various lenders and Gores, obtaining approximately $47,000 in additional capital to satisfy our outstanding debt payments and obtaining a waiver of our 4.0 to 1 debt leverage covenant (which we anticipate violating upon delivery of our audited financial statements as described elsewhere in this report), our sources of liquidity are adequateinadequate to fund immediate and ongoing operating requirements in the next twelve months,months. We currently have an agreement in principle on terms to refinance all of our debt (described in more detail below), however, our bank facility matures in February 2009. Accordingly, we must refinance our bank facility, develop new funding sources and/or raise additional capital. While we reasonably believethere can be no assurance that we will close the refinancing or that the lenders under our Facility and our Senior Notes will not seek to exercise remedies that may be ableavailable to refinance, identify new funding sources, and/or raise additional capital, if we cannot, we may not be ablethem prior to repay the facility upon maturity.such closing. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our shareholders may experience significant dilution. Furthermore, additional financing may not be available when we need it or, if available, financing may not be on terms favorable to us or to our shareholders. If financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may beare unable to developconsummate the refinancing or enhance our services or programs. In addition,the lenders choose to exercise the remedies available to them, we maywould be unable to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures. In addition, if our operating results continue to decline more than anticipated, it may cause usforced to seek a waiver or further amendments to our debt covenants. In these circumstances, if we cannot obtain a waiver or an amendment, our debt would be payable on demand from our lenders.the protection of bankruptcy laws. Any of these events could have a material and adverse effect on our business, continuity, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
As currently contemplated, we expect the refinancing will result in our having the following debt: a new series of $117,500 senior secured notes maturing on July 15, 2012; a new $15,000 unsecured revolver and a new $20,000 unsecured subordinated term loan. Each of the foregoing will have new debt and financial covenants.

 

-23-- 24 -


At December 31, 2007,2008, we had an unsecured five-year $120,000 term loan and a five-year $125,000$75,000 revolving credit facility (referredFacility (collectively referred to in this sectionreport as theour “Facility”), both of which mature inmatured on February 2009. At December 31, 2007, we had available borrowings of approximately $44,000 under our Facility.28, 2009 and currently remain unpaid and outstanding as described above. Interest on the Facility is payable at the prime rate plus an applicable margin of up to 0.25%0.75% or LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 1.25%1.75%, at our option.option and since February 27, 2009, has increased by an additional 2 percentage points (the default rate). The Facility contains covenants, among others, related to dividends, liens, indebtedness, capital expenditures and restricted payments, as defined, interest coverage and leverage ratios. WeIn 2002, we issued the Senior Notes through a private placement comprised of: $150,000 of ten-year Senior Notes due November 30, 2012 (interest at a fixed rate of 5.26%) and $50,000 of seven-year Senior Notes due November 30, 2009 (interest at a fixed rate of 4.64%). The Senior Notes contain covenants, among others, relating to dividends, liens, indebtedness, capital expenditures, and interest coverage and leverage ratios. As discussed above, we failed to make our last interest payment of approximately $5,000 on December 1, 2008 (the foregoing,first business day after November 30, 2008). Since such date, interest on the “Senior Notes”)outstanding amount has increased by an additional 2 percentage points (the default rate). In addition,December 2008, we havesold a ten-year fixed to floating interest rate swap agreement covering $25,000 notional value of our outstanding $150,000 Senior Notes and a seven-year fixed to floating interest rate swap agreement covering $25,000 notional value of our outstanding $50,000 Senior Notes. Both swaps are at three-month LIBOR plus 0.8%. The Senior Notes contain covenants, among others, relating to dividends, liens, indebtedness, capital expenditures, and interest coverage and leverage ratios.
In December 2008, we amended the Facility to, among other things: (i) provide security to our lenders (including holders of our Senior Notes), (ii) reduce the amount of the revolving credit facility to $75,000, (iii) increase the applicable margin on LIBOR loans to 1.75% and on prime rate loans to ..75%, (iv) change the leverage ratio covenant to 4.0 times Annualized Consolidated Operating Cash Flow throughterminated the remaining terminterest rate swaps, resulting in cash proceeds of the Facility, (v) eliminate the provision that deemed$2,150, which has been classified as a financing cash inflow in our Statement of Cash Flows. The resulting gain of $2,150 from the termination of the Management Agreement as an event of default and (vi) include covenants prohibitingderivative contracts is being amortized over the payment of dividends and restricted payments. In addition, we and the advisors to the Strategic Review Committeelife of the Board are actively evaluating options to refinance all or a portion of our existing debt and to obtain additional equity. To that end, we announced that on March 3, 2008, we sold 7,143 shares of Common stock to Gores Radio Holdings LLC (“Gores”) for an aggregate purchase price of $12,500, and we have an option to sell Gores an additional 7,143 shares of Common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $12,500 which we exercised on March 10, 2008 (it is currently anticipated such sale will close on or before March 24, 2008) and to sell between $50,000 and $75,000 of a 7.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with warrants to Gores. The sale and issuance of preferred stock and warrants to Gores is subject to shareholder approval.debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2008 was $2,038 whereas net cash provided by operating activities in 2007 was $27,901, which reflects a decrease of $25,863 or 92.7%. In 2007, net cash provided by operating activities decreased $76,350 or 73.2%, to $27,901$27,091 from $104,251 in 2006,2006. The decreases in 2008 and decreased $14,039, or 11.9%, in 2006 from $118,290 in 2005. The decrease in 2007 waswere principally attributable to a decline in net income (after excluding the 20062008 goodwill impairment charge) and changes in working capital. In 2007, we reduced the amount of time payables and accrued expenses were outstanding, while in 2008 and 2006, we extended the time accounts payable and accrued expenses were outstanding.
We recently announced that we reached an agreement in principle with our lenders to refinance all of our outstanding were extended, resultingindebtedness (including the Facility and the Senior Notes). As set forth in a net usenon-binding term sheet negotiated among the parties, our lenders would exchange all of workingtheir existing indebtedness in us (approximately $241,000 in aggregate principal amount plus unpaid interest of $5,900) for: (1) $117,500 aggregate principal amount of new senior secured notes (the “New Senior Notes”), maturing July 15, 2012; (2) 25% of our common stock; and (3) a one-time cash payment of $25,000. The New Senior Notes would bear interest at 15% per annum payable 10% in cash and 5% in-kind (which would be added to principal quarterly in order to accrue interest but would not be payable until maturity). The New Senior Notes would be prepayable, at any time, in whole or in part without premium or penalty and would contain certain representations and warranties, covenants and events of default. In addition, we would be subject to certain financial covenants, including limitations on capital expenditures and a maximum senior secured leverage test. The New Senior Notes would be guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and would be secured by a first priority lien in substantially all of $62,248.our assets and those of our domestic subsidiaries. Gores has agreed to purchase the debt held by those lenders who do not wish to participate in the New Senior Notes at a discount and any debt purchased by Gores would be exchanged along with the other debt for the same consideration of New Senior Notes, common stock and cash, as described above. In connection with the foregoing, we believe that we will also obtain: (1) a new $15,000 revolving facility on a senior unsecured basis; and (2) a new $20,000 unsecured term loan subordinated to the New Senior Notes and the new revolver. Each of the new revolver and the new term loan would mature on July 15, 2012 and would be guaranteed by Gores. We anticipate that borrowings under the new revolver and the new term loan would bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 4.5% with a minimum LIBOR base of 2.5%.
The refinancing also contemplates that Gores would purchase $25,000 in shares of 8% convertible preferred stock that would: (1) have a $25,000 initial liquidation preference; (2) entitle holders thereof to receive dividends at a rate of 8% per annum; and (3) rankpari passuwith the Series A Preferred Stock currently held by Gores. Gores’ new convertible preferred stock, together with its Series A Preferred Stock, would manditorily convert into 72.5% of our common stock at the time the amendments to our charter (as contemplated by the refinancing transaction) are approved. Subject to certain limitations, Gores’ new convertible preferred stock would participate with the common stock on an as-converted basis with respect to voting, in all dividends and distributions, and upon liquidation. At the closing of the refinancing, Gores would take control of us and our Board.

- 25 -


The foregoing description of the refinancing represents an agreement in principle on the terms of the refinancing. No assurance can be given that we, our existing lenders, the new institutional lender (of the new revolver and new term loan) and Gores will negotiate and execute definitive documentation, that the definitive documentation will reflect the terms contained in the previously agreed upon term sheets and/or that any of the contemplated transactions will occur at all.
In 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, we spent $7,313, $5,849, $5,880, and $4,524,$5,880, respectively, for capital expenditures. Our business does not presently require, and we do not expect in the future to require, significant cash outlays for capital expenditures. However, as a result of a planned investment in a new distribution system, our 2008 capital expenditures are expected to be approximately double the amount spent in 2007.2008 were primarily for copy-splitting and pre-record technologies, IT hardware replacements and TV graphics packages and camera upgrades.
In 2008 we did not pay dividends to our shareholders. In 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, we paid dividends to our shareholders in the amount of $1,663 $27,640 and $27,032,$27,640, respectively. In May 2007, the Board of Directors elected to discontinue the payment of a dividend and does not plan to declare dividends for the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends is also prohibited by the terms of our Facility.
In 20062008 and 2005,2007, we did not purchase any shares of our common stock. In 2006, we purchased approximately 750 (2006) and 8,015 (2005) shares of our Commoncommon stock, at a total cost of $11,044 and $160,604, respectively.$11,044. While we arewere authorized to repurchase up to $290,490 of our Commoncommon stock at December 31, 2007,2008, we did not take such action and do not plan on repurchasing any additional shares for the foreseeable future. Such repurchases are also prohibited by the terms of our Facility.

-24-


Investments
TrafficLand
On December 22, 2008, Metro Networks Communications, Inc. (Metro) and TrafficLand entered into a License and Services Agreement which provides us with a three-year license to market and distribute TrafficLand services and products. Concurrent with the execution of the License Agreement, Westwood One, Inc. (Metro’s parent), TLAC, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westwood formed for such purpose) and TrafficLand entered into an option agreement granting us the right to acquire 100% of the stock of TrafficLand pursuant to the terms of a Merger Agreement which the parties have negotiated and placed in escrow. As a result of payments previously made under the License Agreement, we have the right to cause the Merger Agreement to be released from escrow at any time on or prior to April 15, 2009, at which time the Merger Agreement is deemed “executed”. The release of the Merger Agreement does not guarantee the merger will close, as such agreement contains closing conditions, including the consent of our lenders. Upon consummation of the closing of the merger, the License Agreement would terminate. Costs of $800 associated with this transaction have been expensed as of December 31, 2008.
GTN
On March 29, 2006, our cost method investment in The Australia Traffic Network Pty Limited (“ATN”) was converted to 1,540 shares of common stock of Global Traffic Network, Inc. (“GTN”) in connection with the initial public offering of GTN on that date. The investment in GTN valued at $10,042 at December 31, 2007,was sold during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and we received proceeds of approximately $12,741 and realized a gain of $12,420. Such gain is classifiedincluded as an available for sale security and included in other assetsa component of Other Income/(Loss) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the unrealized gain asStatement of December 31, 2007 is included in unrealized gain on available for sale securities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.Operations.
GTN is the parent company of ATN, and also of Canadian Traffic Network ULC (“CTN”) from whom we purchased a senior secured note in an aggregate principal amount of $2,000 in November 2005. This note was included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet on December 31, 2005. On September 7, 2006, CTN repaid this note in full.POP Radio
On October 28, 2005, we became a limited partner of POP Radio, LP (“POP Radio”) pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement dated as of the same date. As part of the transaction, effective January 1, 2006, we became the exclusive sales representative of the majority of advertising on the POP Radio network for five years, until December 31, 2010, unless earlier terminated by the express terms of the sales representative agreement. We hold a 20% limited partnership interest in POP Radio. No additional capital contributions are required by any of the limited partners. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method. The initial investment balance wasde minimis, and our equity in earnings of POP Radio through December 31, 2008 wasde minimis.

- 26 -


On September 29, 2006, we, along with the other limited partners of POP Radio, we elected to participate in a recapitalization transaction negotiated by POP Radio with Alta Communications, Inc. (“Alta”), in return for which we received $529 on November 13, 2006 which was recorded within Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, if and when Alta elects to exercise warrants it received in connection with the transaction, our limited partnership interest in POP Radio will decrease from 20% to 6%.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table lists our future contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2007:2008:
                    
 Payments due by Period 
                     Total <1 year 1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years >5 years 
 Payments due by Period  
Contractual Obligations (1) Total <1 year 1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years >5 years  
 
Long-term Debt (2) $402,459 $19,586 $217,223 $165,650  
Debt $260,005 $260,005 $ $ $ 
Capital Lease Obligations 3,520 960 1,920 640   2,560 960 1,600   
Operating Leases 43,092 6.750 12,254 9,425 14,663  50,840 9,007 11,820 11,015 18,998 
Other Long-term Obligations 225,760 106,583 84,189 31,388 3,600 
Other Long-term Obligations (2) 669,623 108,442 176,639 148,004 236,538 
           
            
Total Contractual Obligations $674,831 $133,879 $315,586 $207,103 $18,263  $983,028 $378,414 $190,059 $159,019 $255,536 
                      
(1) The above table excludes our FINFin 48 reserves and deferred tax liabilities as the future cash flows are uncertain as of December 31, 2007.2008.
 
(2) Includes the estimated net interest payments on fixed and variable rate debt and related interest rate swaps.debt. Estimated interest payments on floating rate instruments are computed using our interest rate as of December 31, 2007,2008, and borrowings outstanding are assumed to remain at current levels.
We have long-term noncancelable operating lease commitments for office space and equipment and capital leases for satellite transponders.
Included in Other Long-term Obligations enumerated in the table above, are various contractual agreements to pay for talent, broadcast rights, research and various related party arrangements, including $43,273$575,902 of payments due under the new CBS Master Agreement and the previous Management Agreement. As discussed in more fully discusseddetail below, on October 2, 2007, we entered into a new Master Agreement with CBS Radio (whichwhich closed on March 3, 2008).2008. As a result of the new arrangement with CBS Radio, total contractual obligations included in the above table will increase by $545,907be $575,902 ($23,509 <63,832 within 1 year; $107,879$133,790 1-3 years; $123,919$141,742 3-5 years; and, $290,600 >$236,538 beyond 5 years).

-25-


Related Parties
Periods Prior to Closing of Master Agreement with CBS ClosingRadio which occurred on March 3, 2008
CBS Radio holds approximately 16,000 shares of our Commoncommon stock and prior to March 3, 2008, provided ongoing management services to us under the terms of the Management Agreement. In return for receiving services under the Management Agreement, we compensatedpaid CBS Radio via an annual base fee and provided CBS Radio the opportunity to earn an incentive bonus if we exceeded pre-determined targeted cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005,we paid CBS Radio earned cash compensationa base fee of $610, $3,394, and $3,273, and $2,853, respectively,respectively; however, no incentive bonus was paid to CBS Radio in such years as targeted cash flow levels were not achieved during such periods. On March 3, 2008, the Management Agreement terminated.
Prior to March 3, 2008, we and CBS Radio were also parties to a Representation Agreement (which included a News Programming Agreement, a Trademark License Agreement and a Technical Services Agreement) to operate what was referred to as the CBS Radio Network. In addition to the Management Agreement and Representation Agreement described above, we also entered into other transactions with CBS Radio and its affiliates, of CBS Radio, including Viacom, in the normal course of business, including affiliation agreements with many of CBS Radio’s radio stations and agreements with CBS Radio and its affiliates for programming rights. Prior to its termination, the Management Agreement provided that all transactions between us and CBS Radio or its affiliates, other than the Management Agreement and Representation Agreement which agreements were ratified by our shareholders, musthad to be on a basis that is at least as favorable to us as if the transaction were entered into with an independent third party. In addition, subject to specified exceptions, the Management Agreement required that all agreements between us, on the one hand, and CBS Radio or any of its affiliates, on the other hand, were to be approved by the independent members of our Board of Directors.

- 27 -


During 2007,2008, we incurred expenses aggregating approximately $66,633$73,049 for the Representation Agreement, affiliation agreements and the purchase of programming rights from CBS Radio and its affiliates ($75,514(such amounts were $66,633 in 20062007 and $78,388$75,514 in 2005)2006). The description and amounts regarding related party transactions set forth in this report, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes, also reflect transactions between us and Viacom. Viacom is an affiliate of CBS Radio, as National Amusements, Inc. beneficially owns a majority of the voting powers of all classes of common stock of each of CBS Corporation and Viacom.
In addition to the base fee and incentive compensation described above, we granted to CBS Radio seven fully vested and nonforfeitable warrants to purchase 4,500 shares of our Commoncommon stock (comprised of two warrants to purchase 1,000 Common shares per warrant and five warrants to purchase 500 Common shares per warrant). As of December 31, 2007, 1,500 of these warrants were cancelled as our Commoncommon stock did not reach the specified price targets necessary for the warrants to become exercisable. On March 3, 2008, all warrants issued to CBS Radio were cancelled in accordance with the terms of the Master Agreement.
Overview of New Relationship with CBS
As described elsewhere in this report, on March 3, 2008, we and CBS Radio closed the arrangement described in the Master Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2007, by and between us and CBS Radio. On such date, the Master Agreement terminated and our Representation Agreement with CBS Radio was replaced by an Amended and Restated News Programming Agreement, an Amended and Restated License Agreement and an Amended and Restated Technical Services Agreement. At the closing, we and CBS Radio entered into various agreements in substantially the form set forth as exhibits to the Master Agreement, including the following: (1) Amended and Restated News Programming Agreement,Agreement; (2) Amended and Restated Trademark License Agreement,Agreement; (3) Amended and Restated Technical Services Agreement,Agreement; (4) Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue,Sue; (5) Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement,Agreement; (6) Lease for 524 W. 57th Street,Street; (7) Lease for 2020 M Street,Street; (8) Sublease for 2000 M Street,Street; (9) Westwood One Affiliation Agreements for certain CBS Radio owned and operated stations (“CBS Stations”); and (10) Metro Networks Affiliation Agreements for CBS Stations (documents 9 and 10, the “Station Agreements” and documents 1-10 collectively, the “New Transaction Documents”). These agreements were discussed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2007 and included as part of a definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on December 21, 2007. The closing under the Master Agreement was described in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2008 and the New Transaction Documents were included as exhibits to such filing. For convenience, aA brief description of certain provisions of the New Transaction Documents are set forth below,was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, however, for a complete description of terms, please refer to the documents named above and the terms of the actual agreement themselves. The following summary is not complete and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the New Transaction Documents.

-26-


Termination of Existing Agreements
As a result of the Management Agreement having terminated on March 3, 2008, we will employ our own CEO going forward and CBS Radio will no longer reimburse us for the costs related to our CFO. In addition, Mr. Berger, a CBS Radio employee who previously served on our Board of Directors, resigned on March 3, 2008. Going forward, the $15,000 in compensation previously paid to CBS Radio under the Representation Agreement as well as $1,300 of the management fee previously paid to CBS Radio under the Management Agreement will be paid directly to the Stations as compensation under the new Station Agreements, which agreements will replace all existing affiliation agreements as described in more detail below. Under the terms of the Master Agreement, the maximum potential affiliate compensation payable to CBS Radio for broadcasting our commercials increased by $16,300. In addition, under the agreement, CBS Radio may earn an annual incentive bonus of up to $4,000 based on the percentage of commercial inventory its stations broadcast as described below.
New Long Term Distribution Relationship—Station Agreements
We and CBS Radio entered into Station Agreements that document and extend through March 31, 2017 our current distribution of network news, local traffic and news programming, to CBS Stations through affiliation agreements and existing rights to, and levels of commercial inventory for, CBS Stations (also referred to as “Stations” below). The Station Agreements contain significant differences from the previous affiliation agreements, some of which are highlighted below.
Expiration date of all Station Agreements is extended through March 31, 2017, continuing the provision of commercial inventory and related rights for a period that extends eight years beyond the original expiration date of the Management Agreement.
All compensation under Westwood One Affiliation Agreements adjusts either up or down for changes in audience levels (Network only) on Stations (subject to a 3% threshold), as opposed to many of the previous affiliation agreements, under which we paid fixed compensation regardless of fluctuations in audience levels.
Compensation under Westwood One Affiliation Agreements also uniformly adjusts either up or down for commercial clearance, including when clearance is affected by preemption of commercials outside the parameters specified in the agreements. For example, Station compensation is subject topro ratadownward adjustment for commercial clearance between 100% and 90%, compensation is reduced significantly for clearance below 90%, and no compensation whatsoever is paid to a Station if it broadcasts 75% or less of the commercial inventory. Many of the existing affiliation agreements are subject to less punitive penalties as commercial clearance levels decrease.
We may exercise a termination right with respect to a Westwood One Affiliation Agreement and collect liquidated damages from CBS Radio if the applicable CBS Radio Station fails to achieve commercial clearance of at least 75% for a prolonged period of time as described in the agreements. In general, the previous affiliation agreements did not have liquidated damages clauses.
The Station Agreements set forth terms that apply when Stations are sold by CBS Radio, unlike the previous affiliation agreements. For the first 35 Stations sold by CBS Radio, CBS Radio is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to assign the applicable Station Agreements to the buyer for the term of the Station Agreements. If the buyer does not assume the Station Agreements, the Station Agreements may be terminated, however, the commercial inventory must be reallocated by CBS Radio to achieve “Substantially Equivalent Distribution” (as such term is defined in the Station Agreements) among the remaining Stations still owned by CBS Radio for the term of the Station Agreements. In respect of any Station sold by CBS Radio after the first 35 Stations, CBS Radio must cause the buyer to either: (i) assume the Station Agreement for a term extending through the later of December 31, 2014 and the fifth anniversary of the closing of such Station sale (but not beyond March 31, 2017) or (ii) reallocate the inventory to achieve Substantially Equivalent Distribution.

-27-


Under the Station Agreements, Metro Networks Communications, Inc., one of our subsidiaries will be the exclusive source of traffic information on CBS Stations’ analog and HD1 signals, subject to certain exceptions provided in the Station Agreements.
Under the proposed CBS Radio transactions, we will pay CBS Radio a maximum annual bonus of $4,000 for commercial clearance under the Westwood One Affiliation Agreements of 95% or higher and no bonus will be earned by CBS Radio if clearances are below 90%.
Framework for New Relationship—Master Agreement
The Master Agreement was executed by CBS Radio and us on October 2, 2007 and became effective on March 3, 2008 (the “Effective Date”). It provides a legal framework for the proposed new relationship between CBS Radio and us. The Master Agreement itself has certain significant provisions, which in some cases apply to other New Transaction Documents, in part as described below. Certain key terms of the Master Agreement are as follows:
Extends certain existing non-competition and non-solicitation agreements between CBS Radio and us included in the now-terminated Management Agreement through March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and sets forth the terms and conditions relating to CBS Radio’s ability to sell ten second sponsorships adjacent to traffic reports through March 31, 2010.
Extends our previously-existing right of first refusal to syndicate certain CBS Radio programming through March 31, 2017.
Extends certain existing programming agreements between CBS Radio and us through the earlier of their current termination date and March 31, 2017.
Provides for the cancellation of all warrants and related registration rights held by CBS.
As discussed above, provides for a maximum annual bonus of $4,000 payable to CBS Radio for commercial clearance of 95% or higher and no annual bonus payable to CBS Radio if clearances are below 90%.
Provides for a $2,000 payment from CBS Radio to us if commercial clearance in 2008 for CBS’ top ten markets is less than 93.75%.
Provides us with a limited right to defer up to $4,000 in payments to CBS Radio on two occasions during the first two years from the Effective Date.
Provides for new registration rights for CBS Radio’s existing shares of Company Common stock.
Provides for certain confidentiality obligations and related covenants in the event of a change of control where a CBS Radio competitor acquires us or a significant portion of our assets.
Includes termination and cross termination provisions, which are substantially similar to the other New Transaction Documents. These termination and cross termination provisions generally provide, among other things, that:
1.termination for a payment-related dispute pursuant to the provisions of the Master Agreement is not allowed if the amount in dispute is deposited in escrow;

-28-


2.disputes are to be resolved through formal arbitration and the arbitrator shall take into account other appropriate remedies short of termination in deciding whether termination is appropriate;
3.all other New Transaction Documents (except for the Mutual Release as described below) shall terminate if the Master Agreement is terminated (including any termination of the Master Agreement by either CBS or us, as the non-breaching party, in the event that 15% or more of the Station Agreements measured by revenue or number are terminated or if an arbitrator terminates for material breach all or substantially all of the Station Agreements in any two markets where CBS Radio owns at least four Stations), subject to certain exceptions.
Extension of Existing Arrangements with Respect to News Programming, Trademarks and Use of Employees, Equipment and Broadcasting Facilities
As part of the closing under the Master Agreement, we and CBS Radio amended and restated the News Programming Agreement, the Trademark License Agreement and the Technical Services Agreement (“TSA”) and entered into related leases with respect to certain facilities. The changes to these existing agreements and the new leases generally extend certain of our existing rights through March 31, 2017 and, particularly with respect to the TSA and related leases, memorialize in writing certain past practices and occupancy arrangements. Some of the significant provisions of these agreements are summarized below. The terms of the foregoing agreements have the following terms:
Extend the News Programming Agreement, Trademark License Agreement and TSA through March 31, 2017.
Provide us with certain exclusive rights to CBS Radio news programming, and non-exclusive rights to certain CBS Radio trademarks, for domestic AM/FM terrestrial radio broadcast (including HD1 and HD2 channels) in the English language and related simulcast by live internet streaming.
Set a fixed annual news programming fee (with fixed annual escalator) related to CBS Radio news programming.
Limit the assignability of certain CBS Radio trademarks unless pursuant to a concurrent assignment of the Amended and Restated News Programming Agreement.
Clarify and update existing practices related to employees, facilities and equipment at the CBS Radio Broadcast Center located at 524 W. 57th Street in New York City.
Include leases of the facilities at 524 W. 57th Street in New York City and 2020 M Street in Washington D.C. through March 31, 2017, and a sublease of the facilities at 2000 M Street in Washington, D.C. through December 30, 2012.
Provide for post-termination transition periods at the CBS Radio Broadcast Center in the event we are required to vacate the facility.
Release of Claims
As a condition to agreeing to extend our relationship with CBS Radio through March 31, 2017, each party was required to release all potential claims it had or may have against the other party pursuant to a Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue (the “Mutual Release”). The Mutual Release provides for, subject to certain limited exceptions, a mutual release by CBS Radio and the controlled affiliates of CBS Corporation, on the one hand, and our affiliates, on the other hand, of all potential pre-existing claims against the other party.

-29-


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, and other contingencies. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity.
Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when earned, which occurs at the time commercial advertisements are broadcast. Payments received in advance are deferred until earned and such amounts are included as a component of Deferred Revenue in the accompanying Balance Sheet.

- 28 -


We consider matters such as credit and inventory risks, among others, in assessing arrangements with itsour programming and distribution partners. In those circumstances where we function as the principal in the transaction, the revenue and associated operating costs are presented on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations. In those circumstances where we function as an agent or sales representative, our effective commission is presented within Revenue with no corresponding operating expenses.
Barter transactions represent the exchange of commercial announcements for programming rights, merchandise or services. These transactions are recorded at the fair market value of the commercial announcements relinquished, or the fair value of the merchandise and services received. A wide range of factors could materially affect the fair market value of commercial airtime sold in future periods (See the section entitled “Cautionary Statement regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1 and Item 1A “Risk Factors”), which would require us to increase or decrease the amount of assets and liabilities and related revenue and expenses recorded from prospective barter transactions. Revenue is recognized on barter transactions when the advertisements are broadcast. Expenses are recorded when the merchandise or service is utilized.
Program Rights Program rights are stated at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or net realizable value. Program rights and the related liabilities are recorded when the license period begins and the program is available for use, and are charged to expense when the event is broadcast.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the residualexcess of cost over fair value remaining after ascribing estimated fair values to an acquisition’s tangible and intangibleof net assets and liabilities.of businesses acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS 142”) “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the value assigned to goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is not amortized to expense, but rather the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount on at least an annual basis to determine if there is a potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill and intangible assets is less than their carrying value.
Prior to 2008, we operated as a single reportable operating segment: the sale of commercial time. As part of our re-engineering initiative commenced in the fourth quarter of 2008, we installed separate management for the Network and Metro/Traffic divisions providing discreet financial information and management oversight. Accordingly, we have determined that each division is an operating segment. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business which is one level below the operating segment. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments and impairment has been tested at this level.
In order to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities a company may use various methods including discounted cash flows, excess earnings, profit split and income methods. Utilization of any of these methods requires that a company make important assumptions and judgments about future operating results, cash flows, discount rates, and the probability of various scenarios, as well as the proportional contribution of various assets to results and other judgmental allocations. We determineIn 2008 we determined that using a discounted cash flow model was the best evaluation of the fair value of our two reporting units. In prior periods, we evaluated the fair value of our reporting unit by using thebased on a weighted average of 75% from a discounted cash flow modelapproach and 25% from the quoted market pricesprice of itsour stock. The discounted cash flow method relies
On an annual basis and upon the occurrence of certain interim triggering events, we are required to perform impairment tests on our forecasted operating resultsidentified intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, which contain estimatestesting could impact the value of our business. In 2008, we determined that our goodwill was impaired and judgments. In arriving at these estimatesrecorded impairment charges totaling $430,126 ($206,053 in the second quarter and judgments$224,073 in the fourth quarter). The remaining value of our goodwill is approximately $33,988.
Intangible assets subject to amortization primarily consist of affiliation agreements that were acquired in prior years. Such affiliate contacts, when aggregated, create a nationwide audience that is sold to national advertisers. The intangible asset values assigned to the affiliate agreements for each acquisition were determined based upon the expected discounted aggregate cash flows to be derived over the life of the affiliate relationship. The method of amortizing the intangible asset values reflects, based upon our historical experience, an accelerated rate of attrition in the affiliate base over the expected life of the affiliate relationships. Accordingly, we consider internal budgets and strategic plans,amortize the value assigned to affiliate agreements on an accelerated basis (period ranging from 4 to 20 years with a weighted-average amortization period of approximately 8 years) consistent with the pattern of cash flows which are expected long term growth rates, andto be derived. We review the potential effectsrecoverability of possible external factors and market conditions. If actual future conditionsour finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or events differ from our estimates, or if our stock price continues to decline, an additional impairment charge may be necessary to reducecircumstances indicate that the carrying valueamount of goodwill, which charge couldan asset may not be materialrecoverable. Recoverability is assessed by comparison to our resultsassociated undiscounted cash flows. No impairment of operations.intangible assets has been identified in any period presented.

 

-30-- 29 -


Allowance for doubtful accounts We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses which may result from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We base our allowance on the likelihood of recoverability of accounts receivable by aging category, based on past experience and taking into account current collection trends that are expected to continue. If economic or specific industry trends worsen beyond our estimates, weit would be requirednecessary to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts. Alternatively, if trends improve beyond our estimates, we would be required to decrease our allowance for doubtful accounts. Our estimates are reviewed periodically, and adjustments are reflected through bad debt expense in the period they become known. Our bad debt expense was nominal in 2007, $2,323, or 0.5% of revenue, in 2006, $2,035, or 0.4% of revenue, in 2005. Changes in our bad debt experience can materially affect our results of operations. Our allowance for bad debts requires us to consider anticipated collection trends and requires a high degree of judgment. In addition, as fully described herein, our results in any reporting period could be impacted by a relatively few but significant bad debts.
Estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets We estimate the useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in order to determine the amount of depreciation and amortization expense to be recorded during any reporting period. The useful lives, which are disclosed in Note 1- “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the consolidated financial statements, are estimated at the time the asset is acquired and are based on historical experience with similar assets as well as taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. If technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated or in a different form than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods. Alternately, these types of technological changes could result in the recognition of an impairment charge to reflect the write-down in value of the asset.
We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets and finite-lived identifiable intangible assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. Our intangible asset balance is not material ($3,443 at December 31, 2007), and the evaluation of intangible assets requires that we make important assumptions and judgments about future operating results and cash flows as well as discount rates. In estimating future operating results and cash flows, we consider internal budgets and strategic plans, expected long term growth rates, and the effects of external factors and market conditions. If actual future operating results and cash flows or external conditions differ from our judgments, or if changes in assumed discount rates are made, an impairment charge may be necessary to reduce the carrying value of intangible assets, which charge could be material to our results of operations in the year it is recorded.
Valuation of stock options and warrantsFor purposes of computing the value of stock options and warrants, various valuation methods and assumptions can be used. The selection of a different valuation method or use of different assumptions may result in a value that is significantly different from that computed by us. In certain circumstances, usually depending on the complexity of the calculation, we may employ the services of a valuation expert. Additionally, a change in the estimated rate of forfeitures may result in a significant change in stock-based compensation expense for a given period. For further information on assumptions used refer to Note 9 — “Equity-Based Compensation” to the consolidated financial statements. In 2007, we changed our estimated rate of forfeitures based on past experience, which as a result had the effect of reducing stock-based compensation expense by $372, in the current period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting Future Results
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 (“FSP 157-3”) “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” FSP 157-3 clarifies the applications of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active, and addresses application issues such as the use of internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market information when the market is not active, and the use of market quotes when assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 157. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We will include the relevant disclosures in our financial statements beginning with the first quarter of 2009.
In February 2008, FSP 157-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” was issued. FSP 157-1 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2 “Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157” (FSP 157-2), also issued in February 2008, deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operation.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest acquired and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008, and will be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

- 30 -


In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any non-controlling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition of fair value to be applied to US GAAP guidance that requires the use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 wasis effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007;2007, except for certain non-financial assets where the effective date will be January 1, 2009. TheOur adoption of SFAS No. 157 isdid not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), which provides a fair value measurement option for eligible financial assets and liabilities.  Under SFAS No. 159, an entity is permitted to elect to apply fair value accounting to a single eligible item, subject to certain exceptions, without electing it for other identical items.  Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be included in earnings. The fair value option established by this Statement is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. This standard reduces the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and mitigates volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007 which is January 1, 2008.  We will adopt the provisions of this Statement beginning in fiscal 2008. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on our consolidated financial statements, but do not presently anticipate it will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

-31-


In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008, and will be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 141R on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates using financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments (fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements) for the purpose of hedging specific exposures and hold all derivatives for purposes other than trading. All derivative financial instruments held reduce the risk of the underlying hedged item and are designated at inception as hedges with respect to the underlying hedged item. Hedges of fair value exposure are entered into in order to hedge the fair value of a recognized asset, liability or a firm commitment.
In order to achieve a desired proportion of variable and fixed rate debt, in December 2002, we entered into a seven-year interest rate swap agreement covering $25,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowing to effectively float the majority of the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 74 basis points, and two ten-yearten year interest rate swap agreements covering $75,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowing to effectively float the majority of the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. In total, the swaps initially covered $100,000, which representsrepresented 50% of the notional amount of Senior Unsecured Notes.
These swap transactions allow us to benefit from short-term declines in interest rates while having the long-term stability on the other 50% of the Senior Notes of fairly low fixed rates. In November 2007, we cancelled one of the ten-year swap agreements covering $50,000 notional value, by paying the counter-party $576. The instruments meet all of the criteria of a fair-value hedge.hedge and are classified in the same category as the item being hedged in the accompanying balance sheet. We have the appropriate documentation, including the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, identification of the hedginghedged instrument, the hedgedhedge item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness offsets the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value or variabilityvalue. In December 2008, we terminated the remaining interest rate swaps, resulting in cash flows attributable toproceeds of $2,150, which has been classified as a financing cash inflow in our Statement of Cash Flows. The resulting gain of $2,150 from the hedged risk. In November 2007, an interest rate swap agreement covering $50,000 notional valuetermination of its outstanding borrowing was cancelled at a costthe derivative contracts is being amortized over the life of approximately $576.the debt.
With respect to the borrowings pursuant to the Facility, the interest rate on the borrowings was based on the prime rate plus an applicable margin of up to .25%, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 1.25%, as we chose. On January 11, 2008, the Facility was amended, and as a result, the applicable margins increased to 0.75% and 1.75% respectively. Historically, we have typically chosen the LIBOR option with a three month maturity. Every .25% change in interest rates has the effect of increasing or decreasing our annual interest expense by $5 for every $2,000 of outstanding debt. As of December 31, 2008, we had $41,000 outstanding under the Facility and as of December 31, 2007, we had $145,000 outstanding under the Facility.
We continually monitor our positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions that are counterparties to our financial instruments, and do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties.
Our receivables do not represent a significant concentration of credit risk due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we operate.

 

-32-- 31 -


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements and the related notes and schedules were prepared by and are the responsibility of management. The financial statements and related notes were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts based upon management’s best estimates and judgments. All financial information in this annual report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
We maintain internal accounting control systems and related policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and properly recorded, and that accounting records may be relied upon for the preparation of consolidated financial statements and other financial information. The design, monitoring, and revision of internal accounting control systems involve, among other things, management’s judgment with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of specific control measures.
Our consolidated financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who have expressed their opinion with respect to the presentation of these statements.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised solely of directors who are independent under NYSE rules and regulations, meets periodically with the independent auditors, as well as with management, to review accounting, auditing, internal accounting controls and financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, is also responsible for retaining our independent accountants. The independent accountants have full and free access to the Audit Committee with and without management’s presence. Further, as a result of changes in the listing standards for the New York Stock Exchange and as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, membersMembers of the Audit Committee are required to meet stringent independence standards and at least one member must have financial expertise. All of our Audit Committee members satisfy the independence standards and the Audit Committee also has at least one member with financial expertise. As described elsewhere in this report, we were delisted from the NYSE on March 16, 2009. Accordingly, we are no longer subject to the rules and regulations of the NYSE, including those related to independence of directors. At this time, no changes to the Board have been made, but it is contemplated that in connection with the refinancing described in more detail in this report, that Gores will take control of the Board at the closing of the refinancing and that certain changes in directors will be made at that time.
The consolidated financial statements and the related notes and schedules are indexed on page F-1 of this report, and attached hereto as pages F-1 through F-28F-35 and by this reference incorporated herein.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20072008 (the “Evaluation”). Based upon the Evaluation, our Chief Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective as of December 31, 20072008 in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that it fileswe file or submitssubmit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

-33-- 32 -


Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework. Management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20072008 and concluded that it is effective as of such date.
The effectiveness of the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.

 

-34-- 33 -


PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in its definitive proxy statement for its 20082009 annual meeting of shareholders that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10; provided, however, that such information shall not be incorporated herein:
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Additionally, we have submitted to the NYSE a certificationinformation required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by our Chief Executive Officer that asmeans of January 2, 2008, hean amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not aware of any violation bymailed to shareholders and filed with the CompanySecurities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards.registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in its definitive proxy statement for its 20082009 annual meeting of shareholders that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 11;10; provided, however, that such information shall not be incorporated herein:
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 11 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in its definitive proxy statement for its 20082009 annual meeting of shareholders that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 12;10; provided, however, that such information shall not be incorporated herein:
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 12 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

-35-- 34 -


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in its definitive proxy statement for its 20082009 annual meeting of shareholders that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 13;10; provided, however, that such information shall not be incorporated herein:
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 13 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in its definitive proxy statement for its 20082009 annual meeting of shareholders that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 14;10; provided, however, that such information shall not be incorporated herein:
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 14 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
if the information that is responsive to the information required with respect to this Item 10 is provided by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the filing of such definitive proxy statement; or
if such proxy statement is not mailed to shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, in which case the registrant will provide such information by means of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

-36-- 35 -


PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report on Form 10-K
 1,2.
1, 2. Financial statements and schedules to be filed hereunder are indexed on page F-1 hereof.
 
 3. Exhibits
   
EXHIBIT  
NUMBER (A) DESCRIPTION
 
 3.1
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed on October 25, 2002.with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. (14)
3.2 Bylaws of Registrant as currently in effect. (6)+
4.1 Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, between Registrant and the noteholders parties thereto. (15)
4.1.1 First Amendment, dated as of February 28, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, by and between Registrant and the noteholders parties thereto. (34)
10.1 Employment Agreement, dated April 29, 1998, between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz. (8) *
10.2 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated October 27, 2003, between Registrant and
Norman J. Pattiz. (16) *
10.2.1 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated November 28, 2005, between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz (7) *
10.2.2 Amendment No. 3, effective January 8, 2008, to the employment agreement by and between Registrant and Norman Pattiz (30)*
10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Registrant and its directors and executive officers. (1)
10.4 Credit Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank as Administrative Agent. (16)
10.4.1 Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 31, 2006, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (23)
10.4.2 Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 11, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (26)
10.4.3 Amendment No. 3, dated as of February 25, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (13)
10.5 Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 24, 1987, between Registrant and National Broadcasting Company, Inc. (2)
10.6 Agreement and Plan of Merger among Registrant, Copter Acquisition Corp. and Metro Networks, Inc. dated June 1, 1999 (9)
10.7 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan Merger, dated as of August 20, 1999, by and among Registrant, Copter Acquisition Corp. and Metro Networks, Inc. (10)
10.8 Employment Agreement, effective May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Paul Gregrey, as amended by Amendment 1 to Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2006. (35) *
10.8.1 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated May 4, 2007, between Registrant and
Paul Gregrey (27)*
10.9 Employment Agreement, effective October 16, 2004, between Registrant and David Hillman, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2006. (28)*
10.9.1 Amendment No. 2 to the Employment Agreement, effective July 10, 2007, between Registrant and David Hillman. (29)*
10.10 Registrant Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. (22) *
10.11 Amendment to Registrant Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 25, 2005 (19) *
10.12 Registrant 1989 Stock Incentive Plan. (3) *
10.13 Amendments to Registrant’s Amended 1989 Stock Incentive Plan. (4) (5) *

-37-


 10.14 
EXHIBIT
NUMBER (A)DESCRIPTION
10.14 Leases, dated August 9, 1999, between Lefrak SBN LP and Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. and between Infinity and Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. relating to New York, New York offices. (11)

- 36 -


EXHIBIT
NUMBER (A)DESCRIPTION
10.15 Form of Stock Option Agreement under Registrant’s Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. (17) *
10.16 Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Andrew Zaref. (18) *
10.16.1 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2006, between Registrant and Andrew Zaref (24) *
10.17 Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (19) *
10.18 Form Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for outside directors (20) *
10.19 Form Stock Option Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for directors. (21) *
10.20 Form Stock Option Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non-director participants. (21) *
10.21 Form Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non- directornon-director participants. (20)*
10.22 Form Restricted Stock Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non-director participants. (20) *
10.23 Employment Agreement, effective as of July 16, 2007, by and between Registrant and Gary Yusko. (29)*
10.24 Master Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2007, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (31)
10.25 Employment Agreement, effective as of January 8, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.26 Consent Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2008, made by and among CBS Radio Inc., Registrant, and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.27 Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.28 Letter Agreement, dated February 25, 2008, by and between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz (32)*
10.29 Purchase Agreement, dated February 25, 2008, between Registrant and Gores Radio Holdings, LLC. (32)
10.30 Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 3, 2008, between Registrant and Gores Radio Holdings,
LLC. (33)
10.31 Intercreditor and Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2008, by and among Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, the financial institutions that hold the Notes and The Bank of New York, as Collateral Trustee (34)
10.32 Shared Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2008, by and among Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and The Bank of New York, as Collateral Trustee (34)
10.33 Shared Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated as of February 28, 2008, by Registrant, to First American Title Insurance Company, as Trustee, for the benefit of The Bank of New York, as Beneficiary (34)
10.34 Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.35 Amended and Restated News Programming Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.36 Amended and Restated Technical Services Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.37 Amended and Restated Trademark License Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.38 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.39 Lease for 524 W. 57th Street, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Broadcasting Inc. (33)
10.40 Form Westwood One Affiliation Agreement, dated February 29, 2008, between Westwood One, Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of its affiliate, Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. and CBS Radio Inc., on its behalf and on behalf of certain CBS Radio stations (33)
10.41 Form Metro Affiliation Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2008, by and between Metro Networks Communications, Limited Partnership, and CBS Radio Inc., on its behalf and on behalf of certain CBS Radio stations (33)
10.42Employment Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2008, between Registrant and Steven Kalin. (6) *
10.43Employment Agreement, effective as of September 17, 2008, by and between Registrant and Roderick M. Sherwood, III. (36)*

 

-38-- 37 -


   
EXHIBIT  
NUMBER (A) DESCRIPTION
 
10.44  Employment Agreement, effective as of October 20, 2008, by and between Registrant and Gary Schonfeld (37)*
10.45Separation Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse (38)*
10.46Separation Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2008, by and between Registrant and Paul Gregrey *+
10.47License and Services Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between Metro Networks Communications, Inc. and TrafficLand, Inc. (39)
10.48Employment Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2008, between Registrant and Andrew Hersam. *+
10.49
Employment Agreement, effective as of April 14, 2008, by and between Registrant and Jonathan Marshall. *+
10.50Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement for senior executives, amending terms in a manner intended to address Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended *+
10.51Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between the Registrant and Steven Kalin, amending terms in a manner intended to address Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended *+
21 List of Subsidiaries. +
23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. +
31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. +
31.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. +
32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. ***
32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ***
 
 
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan
 
+ Filed herewith.
 
*** Furnished herewith.
 
(A) The Company agreesWe agree to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.
 
(1) Filed as part of Registrant’s September 25, 1986 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(2) Filed an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 4, 1987 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(3) Filed as part of Registrant’s March 27, 1992 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(4) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s July 20, 1994 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s April 29, 1996 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annualquarterly report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended December 31, 1994June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(7) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(8) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(9) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(10) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(11) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(12) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(13) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2008 (filed on February 29, 2008) and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(14) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20022008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(15) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(16) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

- 38 -


 
(17) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(18) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(19) Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K, dated May 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(20) Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report of Form 8-K dated March 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(21) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(22) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s April 30, 1999 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(23) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

-39-


(24) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(25) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(26) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(27) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(28) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(29) Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated July 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(30) Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated January 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(31) Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(32) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2008 (filed on February 27, 2008) and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(33) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(34) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(35) Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(36)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(37)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 24, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(38)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(39)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

-40-- 39 -


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
 
Date: March 14, 200830, 2009 By:  /S/ GARY J. YUSKORODERICK M. SHERWOOD III   
  Gary J. YuskoRoderick M. Sherwood III  
  President and Chief Financial Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
     
Signature Title Date
     
/S/ THOMAS F.X. BEUSSE
Thomas F.X. BeusseRODERICK M. SHERWOOD III
 Director, President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 March 14, 200830, 2009
Roderick M. Sherwood III
    
/S/ GARY J. YUSKO
Gary J. Yusko
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)March 14, 2008
     
/S/ NORMAN J. PATTIZ
Norman J. Pattiz
 Chairman of the Board of Directors March 14, 200830, 2009
Norman J. Pattiz
     
/S/ ALBERT CARNESALE
Albert Carnesale
 Director March 10, 200830, 2009
Albert Carnesale
     
/S/ DAVID L. DENNIS
David L. Dennis
 Director March 14, 200830, 2009
David L. Dennis
    
/S/ GERALD GREENBERG
Gerald Greenberg
DirectorMarch 9, 2008
     
/S/ GRANT F. LITTLE, III
Grant F. Little, III
 Director March 14, 200827, 2009
Grant F. Little, III
     
/S/ H MELVIN MING
H. Melvin Ming
 Director March 14, 200830, 2009
H. Melvin Ming
     
/S/ JOSEPH B. SMITH
Joseph B. Smith
 Director March 14, 200827, 2009
Joseph B. Smith
/S/ IAN WEINGARTENDirectorMarch 27, 2009
Ian Weingarten
/S/ SCOTT HONOURDirectorMarch 30, 2009
Scott Honour
/S/ MARK STONEDirectorMarch 30, 2009
Mark Stone
/S/ EMANUEL NUNEZDirectorMarch 30, 2009
Emanuel Nunez
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(D) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT.
No annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders as of the date of this report.

 

-41-- 40 -


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
     
  Page 
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
    
     
  F-2 
2007  F-3 
2006  F-4 
2006  F-5 
2007  F-6 
  F-7 
     
2. Financial Statement Schedule:
    
     
  F-28
F-35 
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, the required information is immaterial, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

F-1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Westwood One, Inc:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westwood One, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20072008 and December 31, 2006,2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20072008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying indexpresents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 1, Basis of Presentation, Going Concern and Management Plans to the consolidated financial statements, the Company failed to pay its most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect to its Senior Notes, was not in compliance with its maximum leverage ratio covenant for the quarter ending December 31, 2008 and also failed to repay its Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility upon maturity on February 27, 2009. Each of these events constitutes a separate default under the Company’s agreements with its lenders. The occurrence of these defaults allow the lenders to exercise their rights and remedies as defined under the respective agreements, including acceleration of the maturity of the related obligations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii)(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 14, 200830, 2009

 

F-2


WESTWOODWESTOOD ONE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SHEET
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
                
 December 31 December 31,  December 31, December 31, 
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
 
ASSETS
  
CURRENT ASSETS:  
Cash and cash equivalents $6,187 $11,528  $6,437 $6,187 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,602 (2007) and $4,387 (2006) 108,271 115,505 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,632 (2008) and $3,602 (2007) 94,273 108,271 
Warrants, current portion 9,706 9,706   9,706 
Prepaid and other assets 13,990 12,483  18,758 13,990 
          
 
Total Current Assets 138,154 149,222  119,468 138,154 
  
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET 33,012 37,353 
GOODWILL 464,114 464,114 
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET 3,443 4,225 
OTHER ASSETS 31,034 41,787 
Property and equipment, net 30,417 33,012 
Goodwill 33,988 464,114 
Intangible assets, net 2,660 3,443 
Deferred tax asset 14,220 12,916 
Other assets 4,335 18,118 
          
TOTAL ASSETS $669,757 $696,701  $205,088 $669,757 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:  
Accounts payable $17,378 $35,425  $27,807 $17,378 
Amounts payable to related parties 30,859 26,344  22,680 30,859 
Deferred revenue 5,815 8,150  2,397 5,815 
Income taxes payable 7,246 6,149   7,246 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 29,562 43,841  25,565 29,562 
Current maturity of long-term debt 249,053  
          
Total Current Liabilities 90,860 119,909  327,502 90,860 
  
LONG-TERM DEBT 345,244 366,860 
OTHER LIABILITIES 6,022 7,001 
Long-term debt  345,244 
Other liabilities 6,993 6,022 
          
TOTAL LIABILITIES 442,126 493,770  334,495 442,126 
          
  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
Preferred stock: authorized 10,000 shares, none outstanding   
Common stock, $.01 par value: authorized, 300,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 87,105 (2007) and 86,311 (2006) 872 860 
Class B stock, $.01 par value: authorized, 3,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 292 (2007 and 2006) 3 3 
Commitments and Contingencies 
Redeemable preferred stock: $.01 par value, authorized: 10,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 75 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock; liquidation preference $1,000 per share, plus accumulated dividends 73,738  
     
 
SHAREHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
 
Common stock, $.01 par value: authorized: 300,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 101,253 (2008) and 87,105 (2007) 1,013 872 
Class B stock, $ .01 par value: authorized: 3,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 292 (2008 and 2007) 3 3 
Additional paid-in capital 290,786 291,851  293,120 290,786 
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities 5,955 4,570 
Net unrealized gain 267 5,955 
Accumulated deficit  (69,985)  (94,353)  (497,548)  (69,985)
          
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 227,631 202,931 
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
  (203,145) 227,631 
          
  
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $669,757 $696,701 
TOTAL LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 $205,088 $669,757 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-3


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
        
NET REVENUE $451,384 $512,085 $557,830  $404,416 $451,384 $512,085 
              
Operating Costs (includes related party expenses of $73,049, $66,633 and $75,514 respectively) 360,492 350,440 395,196 
Depreciation and Amortization (includes related party warrant amortization of $1,618, $9,706 and $9,706 respectively) 11,052 19,840 20,756 
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses (includes related party expenses of $610, $3,394 and $3,273, respectively) 13,442 13,171 14,618 
Goodwill Impairment 430,126  515,916 
Restructuring Charges 14,100   
Special Charges (includes related party expenses of $5,000, $0 and $0, respectively) 13,245 4,626 1,579 
        
Operating Costs (includes related party expenses of $66,633, $75,514 and $78,388, respectively) 350,440 395,196 378,998 
 
Depreciation and Amortization (includes related party warrant amortization of $9,706, $9,706 and $9,706, respectively) 19,840 20,756 20,826 
 
Goodwill Impairment  515,916  
 
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses (includes related party expenses of $3,394, $3,273 and $2,853, respectively) 13,171 14,618 14,028 
 
Special Charges 4,626 1,579  
        842,457 388,077 948,065 
 388,077 948,065 413,852        
        
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME 63,307  (435,980) 143,978   (438,041) 63,307  (435,980)
Interest Expense 23,626 25,590 18,315  16,651 23,626 25,590 
Other Income  (411)  (926)  (1,440)  (12,369)  (411)  (926)
              
 
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 40,092  (460,644) 127,103 
INCOME TAXES 15,724 8,809 49,217 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX  (442,323) 40,092  (460,644)
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE  (14,760) 15,724 8,809 
              
  
NET (LOSS) INCOME $24,368 $(469,453) $77,886  $(427,563) $24,368 $(469,453)
              
NET (LOSS) INCOME attributable to Common Shareholders
 $(427,563) $24,368 $(469,453)
        
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: 
 
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE 
COMMON STOCK  
BASIC $0.28 $(5.46) $0.86  $(4.39) $0.28 $(5.46)
              
DILUTED $0.28 $(5.46) $0.85  $(4.39) $0.28 $(5.46)
       
        
CLASS B STOCK  
BASIC $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
              
DILUTED $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
              
  
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:  
COMMON STOCK  
BASIC 86,112 86,013 90,714  98,015 86,112 86,013 
              
DILUTED 86,426 86,013 91,519  98,015 86,426 86,013 
              
 
CLASS B STOCK  
BASIC 292 292 292  292 292 292 
              
DILUTED 292 292 292  292 292 292 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-4


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
(In thousands)
                                                                   
 Unrealized      Unrealized     
 Additional Gain on Total Other  (Accumulated Gain on Total   
 Common Stock Class B Stock Paid-in Retained Available for Treasury Stock Shareholders’ Comprehensive  Additional Deficit) Available Share- Compre- 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Sale Securities Shares Amount Equity Income Loss  Common Stock Class B Stock Paid-in Retained for Sale Treasury Stock holders’ hensive 
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Securities Shares Amount Equity Income (Loss) 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004 (restated) 94,354 $944 292 $3 $447,876 $351,886 $ $ $ $800,709 $ 
Net income for 2005      77,886    77,886 77,886 
Equity based compensation     11,686     11,686  
Issuance of common stock under equity based compensation plans 335 3   1,371     1,374  
Excess windfall (shortfall) benefits on stock option exercises     861     861  
Cancellations of vested equity grants      (851)      (851)  
Cash dividend paid       (27,032)     (27,032)  
Purchase of treasury stock         (8,015)  (160,604)  (160,604)  
Retirement of treasury stock  (8,015)  (80)    (160,524)   8,015 160,604   
                       
 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005 (restated) 86,674 $867 292 $3 $300,419 $402,740 $  $ $704,029 $77,886 
   
Balance as of December 31, 2005
 86,674 $867 292 $3 $300,419 $402,740 $  $ $704,029 
Net loss for 2006       (469,453)     (469,453)  (469,453)       (469,453)     (469,453)  (469,453)
Comprehensive income       4,570   4,570 4,570        4,570   4,570 4,570 
Equity based compensation     12,269     12,269       12,269     12,269  
Issuance of common stock under equity based compensation plans 387 4   388     392  
Issuance common stock under equity based compensation plans 387 4   388     392  
Excess windfall (shortfall) benefits on stock option exercises      (131)      (131)        (131)      (131)  
Cancellations of vested equity grants      (10,351)      (10,351)        (10,351)      (10,351)  
Cancellation of warrants     290     290       290     290  
Cash dividend paid       (27,640)     (27,640)         (27,640)     (27,640)  
Purchase of treasury stock         (750)  (11,044)  (11,044)           (750)  (11,044)  (11,044)  
Retirement of treasury stock  (750)  (7)    (11,037)   750 11,044     (750)  (7)    (11,037)   750 11,044   
                                              
 
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 86,311 $864 292 $3 $291,847 $(94,353) $4,570  $ $202,931 $(464,883)
   
Balance as of December 31, 2006
 86,311 $864 292 $3 $291,847 $(94,353) $4,570  $ $202,931 $(464,883)
 
Net income for 2007      24,368    24,368 24,368       24,368    24,368 24,368 
Comprehensive income       1,385   1,385 1,385        1,385   1,385 1,385 
Equity based compensation     9,606     9,606       9,606     9,606  
Issuance of common stock under equity based compensation plans 794 8    (344)      (336)  
Issuance common stock under equity based compensation plans 794 8    (344)      (336)  
Cancellations of vested equity grants      (7,099)      (7,099)        (7,099)      (7,099)  
Cancellation of warrants      (1,561)      (1,561)        (1,561)      (1,561)  
Cash dividend paid      (1,663)     (1,663)        (1,663)      (1,663)  
                                              
Balance as of December 31, 2007
 87,105 $872 292 $3 $290,786 $(69,985) $5,955  $ $227,631 $25,753 
Net loss for 2008       (427,563)     (427,563)  (427,563)
Comprehensive income        (5,688)    (5,688)  (5,688)
Equity based compensation     5,443     5,443  
Issuance common stock under equity based compensation plans 110 1    (1,727)      (1,726)  
Issuance of common stock 14,038 140   22,471     22,611  
Issuance of warrants     440     440  
Cancellations of vested equity grants      (4,722)      (4,722)  
Cancellation of warrants      (19,571)      (19,571)  
                        
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 87,105 $872 292 $3 $290,786 $(69,985) $5,955  $ $227,631 $25,753 
                       
Balance as of December 31, 2008
 101,253 $1,013 292 $3 $293,120 $(497,548) $267  $ $(203,145) $(433,251)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-5


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
            
 Twelve Months Ended             
 December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:  
Net income $24,368 $(469,453) $77,886 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Net (loss) income $(427,563) $24,368 $(469,453)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Depreciation and amortization 19,840 20,756 20,826  11,052 19,840 20,756 
Goodwill Impairment  515,916   430,126  515,916 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment 1,257   
Deferred taxes  (6,480)  (20,546)  (7,451)  (13,907)  (6,480)  (20,546)
Non-cash stock compensation 9,606 12,269 11,686  5,443 9,606 12,269 
Gain on sale of property    (1,022)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other 481 359 393 
Gain on sale of marketable securities  (12,420)   
Amortization of deferred financing costs 1,674 481 359 
       
         (4,338) 47,815 59,301 
 47,815 59,301 102,318  
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable 7,234 17,278 6,830 
Prepaid and other assets  (990) 6,367  (6,787)
Deferred revenue  (2,335)  (936)  (5,172)
Income taxes payable and prepaid income taxes 1,097  (15,724) 16,376 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities  (29,435) 32,813 3,807 
Amounts payable to related parties 4,515 5,152 918 
Decrease in Accounts receivable 13,998 7,234 17,278 
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid and other assets  (2,515)  (990) 6,367 
(Decrease) in Deferred revenue  (3,418)  (2,335)  (936)
(Decrease) Increase in Income taxes payable  (7,246) 1,097  (15,724)
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 13,736  (29,435) 32,813 
(Decrease) Increase in Amounts payable to related parties  (8,179) 4,515 5,152 
              
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 27,901 104,251 118,290  2,038 27,901 104,251 
              
  
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:  
Capital expenditures  (5,849)  (5,880)  (4,524)  (7,313)  (5,849)  (5,880)
Proceeds from sale of property   2,244 
Purchase of loan receivable    (2,000)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 12,741   
Collection of loan receivable  2,000     2,000 
Acquisition of companies and other  75  (181)   75 
              
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (5,849)  (3,805)  (4,461)
Net Cash Provided (Used) In Investing Activities
 5,428  (5,849)  (3,805)
              
  
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:  
Issuance of common stock under equity based compensation plans  392 3,055 
Borrowings under bank and other long-term obligations   70,000 
Issuance of common stock 22,760  392 
Issuance of series A convertible preferred stock and warrants 74,168   
Debt repayments and payments of capital lease obligations  (25,730)  (60,685)  (642)  (104,737)  (25,730)  (60,685)
Termination of swap contracts 2,150   
Dividend payments  (1,663)  (27,640)  (27,032)   (1,663)  (27,640)
Repurchase of common stock   (11,044)  (160,604)    (11,044)
Deferred financing costs   (352)    (1,556)   (352)
Excess windfall tax benefits from stock option exercises  12 861    12 
              
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities  (27,393)  (99,317)  (114,362)  (7,216)  (27,393)  (99,317)
              
  
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (5,341) 1,129  (533)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 250  (5,341) 1,129 
  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 11,528 10,399 10,932  6,187 11,528 10,399 
              
  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $6,187 $11,528 $10,399  $6,437 $6,187 $11,528 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-6


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
NOTE 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Nature of Business
In this report, “Westwood One,” “Company,” “registrant,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Westwood One, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) isWe are a provider of analog and digital content, including news, sports, weather, traffic, video newsprogramming, information services and other informationcontent to the radio, TV and on-line industries. The Company isdigital sectors. We are one of the largest domestic outsource providerproviders of traffic reporting services and one of the nation’s largest radio network,networks, producing and distributing national news, sports, talk, music and special event programs, in addition to local news, sports, weather, video news and other information programming. We deliver our content to over 5,000 radio and television stations in the U.S. The commercial airtime that we sell to our advertisers is acquired from radio and television affiliates in exchange for our programming, content, information, and in certain circumstances, cash compensation.
From 1994 to 2008, Westwood One was managed by CBS Radio, Inc. (“CBS Radio”, previously known as Infinity Broadcasting Corporation (“Infinity”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBS Corporation, pursuant to a management agreement between the Companyus and CBS Radio (then Infinity) which was scheduled to expire on March 31, 2009 (the “Management Agreement”)). On October 2, 2007, the Companywe entered into a new arrangement with CBS Radio that was approved by shareholders on February 12, 2008 and became effective on March 3, 2008, on2008. On such date, the Management Agreement terminated. See Note 2 “Related Party Transactions” for additional information with respect to the new arrangement.
Basis of Presentation, Going Concern and Management Plans
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. We have incurred significant declines in operating results since 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we failed to pay our most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect of the existing Senior Notes and were not in compliance with our maximum leverage ratio covenant under the existing Facility and the Senior Notes at December 31, 2008. Both of these events constitute a separate default under the existing Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility (collectively the “Facility”) and the Senior Notes. In addition, on February 27, 2009, our outstanding Facility matured and became due and payable in its entirety. We did not pay such amount, which also constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. Our lenders have not sought to exercise remedies that may be available to them under applicable law or their respective existing debt agreements. The parties are currently working on negotiating definitive documentation relating to a refinancing of all of our outstanding indebtedness (approximately $247,000, including unpaid interest see Note 6), however, there can be no assurance that the parties will consummate the refinancing or that the lenders will not seek to exercise remedies that may be available to them prior to any such consummation. If we are unable to consummate the refinancing or the lenders choose to exercise the remedies available to them, we would be forced to seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws. Any of these events would have a material and adverse effect on us and accordingly, currently raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
As currently contemplated, we expect the refinancing will result in our having the following debt: a new series of secured notes of $117,500 maturing on July 15, 2012; a new $15,000 senior unsecured revolver and a new $20,000 unsecured subordinated term loan. Each of the foregoing will have new debt and financial covenants.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority and wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Geographic and Segment Information
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” requires disclosure of financial and descriptive information about reportable operating segments, revenue by products or services, and revenue and assets by geographic areas. The Company has determined that it operatesWe established a new organizational structure in a single reportablethe fourth quarter of 2008, pursuant to which we manage and report our business in two operating segment: the sale of commercial airtime. The Company identifies segmentssegments: Network and Metro/Traffic. We evaluated performance based on segment operating (loss) income. Administrative functions such as finance, human resources and information systems are centralized. However, where applicable, portions of the Company’s organization under one management group. The Company’s operations are managed as one unit and resourcesadministrative function costs are allocated without regard to separate functions.between the operating segments. The operating segments do not share programming or report distribution.

F-7


Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when earned, which occurs at the time commercial advertisements are broadcast. Payments received in advance are deferred until earned and such amounts are included as a component of Deferred Revenue in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
The Company considersWe considered matters such as credit and inventory risks, among others, in assessing arrangements with itsour programming and distribution partners. In those circumstances where the Company functionswe function as the principal in the transaction, the revenue and associated operating costs are presented on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations. In those circumstances where the Company functionswe function as an agent or sales representative, the Company’sour effective commission is presented within Revenue with no corresponding operating expenses.
Barter transactions represent the exchange of commercial announcements for programming rights, merchandise or services. These transactions are recorded at the fair market value of the commercial announcements relinquished, or the fair value of the merchandise and services received. A wide range of factors could materially affect the fair market value of commercial airtime sold in future periods (See the section entitled “Cautionary Statement regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1 and Item 1A “Risk Factors”), which would require us to increase or decrease the amount of assets and liabilities and related revenue and expenses recorded from prospective barter transactions.
Revenue is recognized on barter transactions when the advertisements are broadcast. Expenses are recorded when the merchandise or service is utilized. Barter revenue of $13,152, $15,854 $22,923 and $20,200$22,923 has been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively, and barter expenses of $12,740, $16,116 $19,433 and $17,038$19,433 have been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively.

F-7


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Equity-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adoptedWe account for equity based compensation under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R eliminated the alternative set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” allowing companies to use the intrinsic value method of accounting and required which requires that companies record expense for stock compensation on a fair value based method. In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company elected to utilize the modified retrospective transition alternative and has, therefore, previously restated all periods prior to January 1, 2006 reflect stock compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123R.
Depreciation
Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
   
Buildings 40 years
Leasehold Improvements Shorter of life or lease term
Recording, broadcasting and studio equipment 5 – 10 years
Furniture and equipment and other 3 – 10 years
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management continually evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets and the valuation of such, barter inventory, fair value of stock options granted, forfeiture rate of equity based compensation grants, income taxes and valuation allowances on such and other contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

F-8


Cash Equivalents
The Company considersWe consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintainsWe maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses which may result from the inability of itsour customers to make required payments. The Company bases itsWe base our allowance on the likelihood of recoverability of accounts receivable by aging category, based on past experience and taking into account current collection trends that are expected to continue. If economic or specific industry trends worsen beyond the Company’sour estimates, itwe would be required to increase itsour allowance for doubtful accounts. Alternatively, if trends improve beyond itsour estimates, itwe would be required to decrease itsour allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company’sOur estimates are reviewed periodically, and adjustments are reflected through bad debt expense in the period they become known. Changes in the Company’sour bad debt experience can materially affect the Company’sour results of operations. The Company’sOur allowance for bad debts requires itus to consider anticipated collection trends and requires a high degree of judgment. In addition, as fully described herein, the Company’sour results in any reporting period could be impacted by relatively few but significant bad debts.

F-8


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Program Rights
Program rights are stated at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or net realizable value. Program rights and the related liabilities are recorded when the license period begins and the program is available for use, and are charged to expense when the event is broadcast.
Financial Instruments
The Company usesWe use derivative financial instruments (fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements) for the purpose of hedging specific exposures and holdshold all derivatives for purposes other than trading. All derivative financial instruments held reduce the risk of the underlying hedged item and are designated at inception as hedges with respect to the underlying hedged item. Hedges of fair value exposure are entered into in order to hedge the fair value of a recognized asset, liability or a firm commitment. Derivative contracts are entered into with major creditworthy institutions to minimize the risk of credit loss and are structured to be 100% effective. The Company hasIn 2007, we had designated the interest rate swaps as a fair value hedge. Accordingly pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, the fair value of the swaps arewere included in other current assets (liabilities) on the consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying value of the underlying debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006.2007. In December 2008 we terminated the remaining interest rate swaps, resulting in cash proceeds of $2,150, which has been classified as a financing cash inflow in our Statement of Cash Flows. The resulting gain of $2,150 from the termination of the derivative contracts is being amortized over the life of the debt.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS 142”) “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the value assigned to goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is not amortized to expense, but rather the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount on at least an annual basis to determine if there is a potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill and intangible assets is less than their carrying value. The Company
Prior to 2008, we operated as a single reportable operating segment: the sale of commercial time. As part of our re-engineering initiative implemented in the second half of 2008, we installed separate management for the Network and Metro/Traffic divisions providing discrete financial information and management oversight. Accordingly, we have determined that each division is an operating segment. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business which is one level below the operating segment. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments and impairment has been tested at this level.

F-9


In order to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities a company may use various methods including discounted cash flows, excess earnings, profit split and income methods. Utilization of any of these methods requires that a company make important assumptions and judgments about future operating results, cash flows, discount rates, and the probability of various scenarios, as well as the proportional contribution of various assets to results and other judgmental allocations. In conjunction with the change to two reporting units, we determined that using the discounted cash flow model in its entirety to be the best evaluation of the fair value of our two reporting units. In prior periods, we evaluated the fair value of itsour one reporting unit based on a weighted average of seventy-five percent from a discounted cash flow approach and twenty-five percent from the quoted market price of our stock.
On an annual basis and upon the Company’s stock at December 31, 2007. This approach is consistentoccurrence of certain events, we are required to perform impairment tests on our identified intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, which testing could impact the approach applied in prior years. The analysis at December 31, 2007, indicates that the fair value of our business. In 2008, we determined that our goodwill was impaired and recorded impairment charges totaling $430,126 ($206,053 in the reporting unit issecond quarter and $224,073 in excessthe fourth quarter as a result of the carryingour annual impairment test). The remaining value of the reporting unit and accordingly no impairment exists.our goodwill is approximately $33,988.
Intangible assets subject to amortization primarily consist of affiliation agreements that were acquired in prior years. Such affiliate contracts, when aggregated, create a nationwide audience that is sold to national advertisers. The intangible asset values assigned to the affiliate agreements for each acquisition were determined based upon the expected discounted aggregate cash flows to be derived over the life of the affiliate relationship. The method of amortizing the intangible asset values reflects, based upon the Company’sour historical experience, an accelerated rate of attrition in the affiliate base over the expected life of the affiliate relationships. Accordingly, the Company amortizeswe amortized the value assigned to affiliate agreements on an accelerated basis (periods ranging from 4 to 20 years with a weighted-average amortization period of approximately 8 years) consistent with the pattern of cash flows which are expected to be derived. The Company reviewsWe review the recoverability of itsour finite-lived intangible assets for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by comparison to associated undiscounted cash flows. No impairment of intangible assets has been identified in any period presented.
Income Taxes
The Company usesWe use the asset and liability method of financial accounting and reporting for income taxes required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under SFAS 109, deferred income taxes reflect the tax impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for tax purposes.

F-9


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Effective January 1, 2007, the Companywe adopted FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” which resulted in no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company classifiesWe classified interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109 and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with this Interpretationinterpretation is a two-step process. The first step is recognition, in which the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements.
We determined, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax asset will be realized. We have experienced a long history of taxable income which would enable us to carryback any potential future net operating losses and taxable temporary differences that can be used as a source of income. As such, no valuation allowance was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. We will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance at each future reporting period.

F-10


Earnings per Share
We have outstanding two classes of common stock (common stock and Class B stock) and a class of preferred stock (7.50% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, referred to herein as the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Both the Class B stock and the Series A Preferred Stock are convertible to common stock. With respect to dividend rights, the common stock is entitled to cash dividends of at least ten percent higher than those declared and paid on our Class B stock, and the Series A Preferred Stock is also entitled to dividends as discussed in Note 3 The Series A Preferred Stock is therefore considered a participating security requiring use of the “two-class” method for the computation of basic net income (loss) per share in accordance with EITF 03-06. Losses are not allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock in the computation of basic earnings per share as the Series A Preferred Stock is not obligated to share in losses. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the “if-converted” method.
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes all dilutionthe effect of common stock equivalents and is calculatedcomputed using the “two-class” computation method, which divides the sum of distributed earnings to common and Class B stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to Common stockholders and Series A Preferred stockholders on a pro rata basis, after Series A Preferred Stock dividends, by the weighted average number of Common shares of common stock outstanding induring the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that would occurcould result if all dilutive financial instruments which may be exchanged for equity securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted to Commoninto common stock.
Earnings Diluted earnings per common share is calculated, utilizingassumes the “two-class”exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method by dividingand the sumconversion of distributed earnings to Common and Class B shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to Common shareholders by the weighted average number of Common shares outstanding during the period. In applying the “two-class” method, undistributed earnings are allocated to Common shares and Class B stock in accordance withand Series A Preferred Stock using the cash dividend provisions of the Company’s articles of incorporation. Such provisions provide that payment of a cash dividend to holders of Common shares does not necessitate a dividend payment to holders of Class B stock. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-06, the Company has allocated all undistributed earnings to Common shareholders in the calculations of net income per share.“if-converted” method.

F-11


The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s Commonour shares of common stock and Class B sharesstock outstanding for calculating basic and diluted net (loss) income per share:
                        
 Year ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
  
Net Income (Loss)
 $24,368 $(469,453) $77,886 
Net (Losses) Income
 $(427,563) $24,368 $(469,453)
Less: Accumulated Preferred Stock dividends  (3,081)   
Less: distributed earnings to Common shareholders 1,658 27,565 26,962   1,658 27,565 
Less: distributed earnings to Class B shareholders 5 75 70   5 75 
              
Undistributed earnings $22,705 $(497,093) $50,854  $(430,644) $22,705 $(497,093)
              
  
Earnings — Common stock
  
Basic
  
Distributed earnings to Common shareholders $1,658 $27,565 $26,962  $ $1,658 $27,565 
Undistributed earnings allocated to Common shareholders 22,705  (497,093) 50,854   (430,644) 22,705  (497,093)
              
Total Earnings — Common stock, basic
 $24,363 $(469,528) $77,816  $(430,644) $24,363 $(469,528)
              
  
Diluted
  
Distributed earnings to Common shareholders $1,658 $27,565 $26,962  $ $1,658 $27,565 
Distributed earnings to Class B shareholders 5  70   5  
Undistributed earnings allocated to Common shareholders 22,705  (497,093) 50,854   (430,644) 22,705  (497,093)
              
Total Earnings — Common stock, diluted
 $24,368 $(469,528) $77,886  $(430,644) $24,368 $(469,528)
              
  
Weighted average Common shares outstanding, basic
 86,112 86,013 90,714  98,015 86,112 86,013 
Share-based compensation 22  513   22  
Warrants        
Weighted average Class B shares 292 292  292 292 292 
              
Weighted average Common shares outstanding, diluted
 86,426 86,013 91,519  98,307 86,426 86,305 
              
 
(Loss) Earnings per Common share, basic
 
Distributed earnings, basic $ $0.02 $0.32 
Undistributed earnings — basic  (4.39) 0.26  (5.78)
       
Total
 $(4.39) $0.28 $(5.46)
       
 
(Loss) Earnings per Common share, diluted
 
Distributed earnings, diluted $ $0.02 $0.32 
Undistributed earnings — diluted  (4.39) 0.26  (5.78)
       
Total
 $(4.39) $0.28 $(5.46)
       
 
Earnings per share — Class B Stock
 
Basic
 
Distributed earnings to Class B shareholders $ $5 $75 
Undistributed earnings allocated to Class B shareholders    
       
Total Earnings — Class B Stock, basic
 $ $5 $75 
       
 
Diluted
 
Distributed earnings to Class B shareholders $ $5 $75 
Undistributed earnings allocated to Class B shareholders    
       
Total Earnings — Class B Stock, diluted
 $ $5 $75 
       

 

F-10F-12


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
                        
 Year ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005 
 
Earnings per Common share, basic
 
Distributed earnings, basic $0.02 $0.32 $0.30 
Undistributed earnings — basic 0.26  (5.78) 0.56 
       
 
Total
 $0.28 $(5.46) $0.86 
       
Earnings per Common share, diluted
 
Distributed earnings, diluted $0.02 $0.32 $0.29 
Undistributed earnings — diluted 0.26  (5.78) 0.56 
       
Total $0.28 $(5.46) $0.85 
       
 
Earnings per share — Class B Stock
 
Basic
 
Distributed earnings to Class B shareholders $5 $75 $70 
Undistributed earnings allocated to Class B shareholders    
       
Total Earnings per share — Class B Stock, basic
 $5 $75 $70 
       
 
Diluted
 
Distributed Earnings to Class B shareholders 5 75 70 
Undistributed earnings allocated to Class B shareholders    
       
Total Earnings — Class B Stock, diluted
 $5 $75 $70 
        2008 2007 2006 
  
Weighted average Class B shares outstanding, basic
 292 292 292  292 292 292 
Share-based compensation        
Warrants       
              
Weighted average Class B shares outstanding, diluted
 292 292 292  292 292 292 
              
  
Earnings per Class B share, basic
  
Distributed earnings, basic $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
Undistributed earnings — basic        
              
Total
 $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
              
 
Earnings per Class B share, diluted
  
Distributed earnings, diluted $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
Undistributed earnings — diluted        
              
Total
 $0.02 $0.26 $0.24  $ $0.02 $0.26 
              
Common equivalent shares are excluded in periods in which they are anti-dilutive. The following options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and warrants (see Note 2 — “Related Party Transactions” for more information) were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the combined exercise price, unamortized fair value, and excess tax benefits were greater than the average market price of the Company’s Commonour common stock for the years presented:
                        
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Options 6,426 6,993 8,003  7,000 6,426 6,993 
Restricted Stock 971 326   364 971 326 
Restricted Stock Units 203 226 101  1,216 203 226 
Warrants 3,000 3,500 4,000  10,000 3,000 3,500 
The per share exercise prices of the options excluded were $0.05-$38.34 in 2008, $1.87-$38.34 in 2007 and $9.13-$38.34 in 2006 and $20.50-$38.34 in 2005.2006. The per share exercise prices of the warrants excluded were $5-$7 in 2008, and $43.11-$67.98 in 2007 2006 and 2005.

F-11


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
2006.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007,October 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “TheFSP 157-3 (“FSP 157-3”) “Determining the Fair Value Optionof a Financial Asset When the Market for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendmentThat Asset Is Not Active.” FSP 157-3 clarifies the applications of FASB No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), which provides157 in a market that is not active, and addresses application issues such as the use of internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market information when the market is not active, and the use of market quotes when assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 157 (defined below). The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or the fair value measurement option for eligiblevalues of our financial assets and liabilities. Under
In February 2008, FSP 157-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” was issued. FSP 157-1 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 159, an entity is permitted to elect to apply fair value accounting to a single eligible item, subject to certain exceptions, without electing it for other identical items. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which157. FSP 157-2 “Partial Deferral of the fair value option has been elected will be includedEffective Date of Statement 157” (FSP 157-2), also issued in earnings. The fair value option established byFebruary 2008, deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 159 is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. This standard reduces the complexity in accounting157 for financial instruments and mitigates volatility in earnings caused by measuring relatedall non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s firstto fiscal yearyears beginning after November 15, 2007 which for the Company is January 1, 2008. The Company will adopt the provisionsimplementation of SFAS No. 159 beginning in fiscal 2008. Managementthis standard is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but does not presently anticipate it willanticipated to have a material effectimpact on itsour consolidated financial position orand results of operations.operation.
In September 2006, the FASB issued “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition of fair value to be applied to US GAAP guidance that requires the use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for certain non-financial assets where the effective date will be January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impactOur adoption of adopting SFAS No. 157 but doesdid not presently expect that it will have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

F-13


In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We will include the relevant disclosures in our financial statements beginning with the first quarter of 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in itsour financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008, and will be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Management2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent (sometimes called “minority interests”) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any non-controlling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any,effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements.
Reclassifications and Revisions
In 2008, we recorded various adjustments related to prior periods including a reduction of the adoptionstock-based compensation expense of SFAS 141R on our consolidated results$1,225, an increase to salary expense to record unused vacation time of operations$1,107, a write-off of fixed assets of $705 and financial condition.
The Company adopted the following accounting standards in fiscal 2007, nonean unrealized gain of which had a material effect on our consolidated results of operations during such period or financial condition at the end of such period:
SFAS No. 154, “Accounting for Changes and Error Corrections”;
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”;
FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Account for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, and interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.
Reclassification$665.
Certain amounts reported in prior years2006 have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Revenue from certain contracts were previously recorded net of expenses paid to third party partners. The Company hasIn 2007, we had determined that itwe should be recording the related revenue and expense gross in itsour statement of operations. Accordingly, revenue and operating costs for 2006 were increased by $18,089. In addition, a portion of a health care cost credit previously reflected entirely within corporate general and administrative expenses has been reclassified to operating costs. As a result, operating costs for 2006 decreased and corporate general and administrative expenses increased by $1,413.
We conducted an analysis of the impact of such errors and adjustments on various line items of our financial statements and concluded that such errors and adjustments are not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 2008, and did not have any impact on any key trend or indicator of us, including our debt covenants. Accordingly, we determined the adjustments described above are not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements for 2008 or for any prior period’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, we have not restated any prior period amounts.
NOTE 2 — Related Party Transactions:
CBS Radio
On March 3, 2008, we closed on the Master Agreement entered into on October 2, 2007 with CBS Radio, holdswhich documents a long-term agreement through March 31, 2017. As part of the new agreement, CBS Radio agreed to broadcast certain of our local/regional and national commercial inventory through March 31, 2017 in exchange for certain programming and/or cash compensation. Additionally, the News Programming Agreement, the Technical Services Agreement and the Trademark License Agreement were amended and restated and extended through March 31, 2017. The previous Management Agreement and Representation Agreement were cancelled on March 3, 2008 and $16,300 of compensation previously paid to CBS Radio under those agreements were added to the maximum potential compensation CBS Radio could earn pursuant to its station affiliation with us. In addition, all warrants previously granted to CBS Radio were cancelled on March 3, 2008.

F-14


CBS Radio owns 16,000 shares of our common equity position in the Companystock and hasprior to March 3, 2008 provided ongoing management services to the Companyus under the terms of the Management Agreement. As payment for services received under the previous Management Agreement, the Company compensateswe compensated CBS Radio via an annual base fee and providesprovided CBS Radio the opportunity to earn an incentive bonus if the Company exceedswe exceeded pre-determined targeted cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005,we paid CBS Radio earned cash compensationa base fee of $610, $3,394 $3,273 and $2,853,$3,273, respectively. No incentive bonus was paid to CBS Radio in such years as targeted cash flow levels were not achieved during such periods.

F-12


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Additionally, the Companywe granted to CBS Radio seven fully vested and non-forfeitable warrants to purchase 4,500 shares of the Company’s Commonour common stock in the aggregate (comprised of two warrants to purchase 1,000 shares of Commoncommon stock per warrant and five warrants to purchase 500 shares of Commoncommon stock per warrant). Of the seven warrants issued, two 1,000 share warrants had an exercise price of $43.11 and $48.36, respectively, and become exercisable: (A) if the average price of the Company’s Commonour common stock reaches a price of $64.67 and $77.38, respectively, for at least 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days for any period throughout the ten year term of the warrants or (B) upon the termination of the Management Agreement by the Companyus in certain circumstances as described in the terms of such warrants.
The exercise prices for the five remaining warrants were equal to $38.87, $44.70, $51.40, $59.11 and $67.98, respectively. These warrants each had a term of 10 years (only if they become exercisable) and becomewere exercisable on January 2, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, subject to a trading price condition. The trading price condition specifiesspecified that the average price of the Company’s Commonour common stock for each of the 15 trading days prior to January 2 of the applicable year (commencing on January 2, 2005 with respect to the first 500 warrant tranche and each January 2 thereafter for each of the remaining four warrants) must be equal to at least both the exercise price of the warrant and 120% of the corresponding prior year 15 day trading average. The Company’sOur stock price did not equal or exceed the predetermined levels with respect to the 2005, 2006, 2007 and 20072008 warrants, and therefore, the warrants did not becomenever became exercisable. In connection with the cancellation of these warrants, the Companyon March 3, 2008 we reduced the related deferred tax asset, resulting in a reduction of additional paid in capital of $4,854.$9,056.
In connection with the May 2002 issuance of warrants to CBS Radio for management services to be provided to the Company in the future, the CompanyMay 2002, we originally reflected the fair value of the warrant issuance of $48,530 as a component of Other Assets with a corresponding increase to Additional Paid in Capital in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Upon commencement of the term of the service period to which the warrants relate (April 1, 2004), the Companywe commenced amortizing the cost of the warrants ratably over the five-year service period. At December 31, 2007, the unamortized value of the May 2002 warrants was $12,132, of which $9,706 was included as a component of Prepaid and Other Assets and $2,426 was included as a component of Other Assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Related Amortization Expense was $1,618 in 2008 and $9,706 in 2007 2006, and 2005.2006.
In addition to the Management Agreement described above, the Companywe also entered into other transactions with CBS Radio and affiliates of CBS Radio, including Viacom, in the normal course of business. Such arrangements include a Representation Agreement (including a related news programming agreement, a license agreement and a technical services agreement with an affiliate of CBS Radio — collectively referred to as the “Representation Agreement”) to operate the CBS Radio Networks, affiliation agreements with many of CBS Radio’s owned and operated radio stations and the purchase of programming rights from CBS Radio and affiliates of CBS Radio. The Management Agreement providesprovided that all transactions between the Companyus and CBS Radio or its affiliates, other than the Management Agreement and Representation Agreement which were ratified by the Company’sour shareholders, must be on a basis that is at least as favorable to the Companyus as if the transactions were entered into with an independent third party. In addition, subject to specified exceptions, all agreements between the Companyus and CBS Radio or any of its affiliates must be approved by the Company’sour Board of Directors.

F-15


The Company
We incurred the following expenses relating toas a result of transactions with CBS Radio or its affiliates forin the following years:
             
Nature 2007  2006  2005 
             
Representation Agreement $27,319  $27,142  $25,699 
Programming and Affiliations  39,314   48,372   52,689 
Management Agreement (excluding warrant amortization)  3,394   3,273   2,853 
Warrant Amortization  9,706   9,706   9,706 
          
  $79,733  $88,493  $90,947 
          

F-13


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Representation Agreement $15,440  $27,319  $27,142 
Programming and Affiliations  57,609   39,314   48,372 
Management Agreement
(excluding warrant amortization)
  610   3,394   3,273 
Warrant Amortization  1,618   9,706   9,706 
Payment upon closing of Master Agreement  5,000       
          
  $80,277  $79,733  $88,493 
          
Expenses incurred for the Representation Agreement and programming and affiliate arrangements are included as a component of Operating Costs in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. Expenses incurred for the Management Agreement (excluding warrant amortization) and amortization of the warrants granted to CBS Radio under the Management Agreement are(through March 3, 2008) were included as a component of Corporate, General and Administrative Expenses and Depreciation and Amortization, respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. The description and amounts regarding related party transactions set forth in these consolidated financial statements and related notes also reflect transactions between the Companyus and Viacom. Viacom is an affiliate of CBS Radio, as National Amusements, Inc. beneficially owns a majority of the voting powers of all classes of common stock of each of CBS Corporation and Viacom.
On October 2, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with CBSPOP Radio through March 31, 2017. As part of the new agreement which was approved by our shareholders on February 12, 2008, CBS Radio agreed to broadcast certain of the Company’s local/regional and national commercial inventory through March 31, 2017 in exchange for certain programming and/or cash compensation. Additionally, the News Programming Agreement, the Technical Services Agreement and the Trademark License Agreement were amended and restated and extended through March 31, 2017. The Management and Representation Agreements were cancelled on the effective date and $16,300 of compensation previously paid to CBS Radio under those agreements were added to the maximum potential compensation CBS Radio could earn pursuant to its station affiliation with the Company. In addition, all warrants previously granted to CBS Radio were cancelled. The new arrangement became effective on March 3, 2008.
The CompanyWe also hashave a related party relationship, including a sales representation agreement, with itsour investee, POP Radio, L.P., which is described in Note 5 —“Investments— “Acquisitions and Note Receivable.Investments.
NOTE 3 — Property and Equipment:
                
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and is summarized as follows at: 
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and is summarized as follows: 
Land, buildings and improvements $12,188 $12,278  $11,999 $12,188 
Recording, broadcasting and studio equipment 71,090 77,927  75,907 71,090 
Furniture and equipment and other 19,274 11,641 
Furniture, equipment and other 18,445 19,274 
          
 102,552 101,846  $106,351 $102,552 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization 69,540 64,493  75,934 69,540 
          
Property and equipment, net $33,012 $37,353  $30,417 $33,012 
          
Depreciation expense was $8,652, $9,134 $9,693 and $9,412$9,693 for the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. In 2001, the Companywe entered into a Capital Leasecapital lease for satellite transponders totaling $6,723. Accumulated amortization related to the Capital Leasecapital lease was $4,258$4,949 and $3,586$4,258 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively.
In December 2005, the Company sold property with a net book value of $1,222 resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,022. This pre-tax gain has been included in Other Income in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.
NOTE 4 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets:
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), the value assigned to goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is not amortized to expense, but rather the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount on at least an annual basis to determine if there is a potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill and intangible assets is less than their carrying value.

F-16


Prior to the fourth quarter 2008, we operated as a single reportable operating segment: the sale of commercial time. As part of our Metro/Traffic re-engineering initiative implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008, we installed separate management for the Network and Metro/Traffic divisions providing discreet financial information and management oversight. Accordingly, we have determined that each division is an operating segment. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business which is one level below the operating segment. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments and impairment has been tested at this level.
In the fourth quarter 2008, in conjunction with the change to two reporting units, we determined that solely using the income approach was the best evaluation of the fair value of our two reporting units. In prior periods, we evaluated the fair value of our reporting unit based on a weighted average of the income approach (75% weight) and the quoted market price of our stock (25% weight).
In 2008, we determined that our goodwill was impaired and recorded impairment charges totaling $430,126 ($206,053 in the second quarter and $224,073 in the fourth quarter). The remaining value of our goodwill is $33,988.
In using the income approach to test goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2008, we made the following assumptions: (a) the discount rate was 14%; (b) market growth rates were based upon management’s estimates of future performance and (c) terminal growth rates were in the 2% to 3% range. The discount rate reflects the volatility of our operating performance and our common stock. The market growth rates and operating performance estimates reflect the current general economic pressures impacting both the national and a number of local economies, and specifically, national and local advertising revenues in the markets in which our affiliates operate.
Earlier in 2008, as a result of a continued decline in our operating performance and stock price, caused in part by reduced valuation multiples in the radio industry, we determined a triggering event had occurred and as a result performed an interim test to determine if our goodwill was impaired at June 30, 2008. The interim test resulted in an impairment of goodwill and accordingly, we recorded a non-cash charge of $206,053. The majority of the goodwill impairment charge is not deductible for income tax purposes.
In connection with itsthe income approach portion of the goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2008, we used the following assumptions: (a) the discount rate was 12%; (b) market growth rates that were based upon management’s estimates of future performance of our operations and (c) terminal growth rates were in the 2% to 3% range. The discount rate reflects the volatility of our operating performance and our common stock. The market growth rates and operating performance estimates used reflected the general economic pressures impacting both the national and a number of local economies, and specifically, national and local advertising revenues in the markets in which our affiliates operate as of June 30, 2008.
Determining the fair value of our reporting units requires our management to make a number of judgments about assumptions and estimates that are highly subjective and that are based on unobservable inputs. The actual results may differ from these assumptions and estimates; and it is possible that such differences could have a material impact on our financial statements. In addition to the various inputs (i.e. market growth, discount rates) that we use to calculate the fair value of our reporting units, we evaluate the reasonableness of our assumptions by comparing the total fair value of all our reporting units to our total market capitalization; and by comparing the fair value of our reporting units to recent or proposed transactions.
As noted above, we are required under SFAS 142 to test our goodwill on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that these assets might be impaired. As a result, if the current economic trends continue and the credit and capital markets continue to be disrupted, it is possible that we may record further impairments in 2009.
In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing for 2007, the Companywe determined its goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2007. The conclusion that the fair value of the Company was greater than its carrying value at December 31, 2007 was based upon management’s best estimates including a valuation study that was prepared by an independent firm specializing in valuation services using the Company’s operational forecasts. The fair value was calculated on a consistently applied weighted average basis using a discounted cash flow model and the quoted market price of the Company’s stock.

F-14


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
In connection with its annual goodwill impairment testing forFor the year ended December 31, 2006, the Companywe determined there was an impairment of goodwill and recorded a non-cash charge of $515,916. The goodwill impairment, the majority of which is not deductible for income tax purposes, was primarily due to our declining operating performance in fiscal 2006 and the reduced valuation multiples in the radio industry.

F-17


The 2006 impairment charge reflects the amount by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the residual value (or implied fair value of goodwill) remaining after ascribing fair values to the Company’s tangible and intangible assets. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. As a result, the Company allocated the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the Company as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of the goodwill.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 20062007 are as follows:
         
  2007  2006 
         
Balance at January 1, $464,114  $982,219 
Pre-acquisition contingencies related to Income taxes and other     (2,189)
Impairment     (515,916)
       
  $464,114  $464,114 
       
         
  2008  2007 
         
Balance as of January 1, $464,114  $464,114 
Impairment (Metro/Traffic)  (303,703)   
Impairment (Network)  (126,423)   
       
Balance as of December 31,
 $33,988  $464,114 
       
At December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, the gross value of the Company’sour amortizable intangible assets was approximately $28,380, with accumulated amortization of approximately $24,937$25,720 and $24,155,$24,937, respectively. Amortization expense was $782,$783, $783 and $1,170$783 for the yearyears ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively. The Company’sWe estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangibles for fiscal year 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2012 are $783,2013 will be $783, $734, $634, $134 and $134, respectively.
NOTE 5 — InvestmentsAcquisitions and Note Receivable:Investments:
On December 22, 2008, we entered into a License and Services Agreement with TrafficLand which provides us with a three-year license to market and distribute TrafficLand services and products. Concurrent with the execution of the License Agreement, we entered into an option agreement with TrafficLand granting us the right to acquire 100% of the stock of TrafficLand pursuant to the terms of a merger agreement which the parties have negotiated and placed in escrow. Specifically, if we pay the first $3,000 of fees under the License Agreement on or before February 20, 2009, we will have the right to cause the merger agreement to be released from escrow at any time between that payment date and March 31, 2009. Since we have made the minimum Payments required under the License Agreement, we may elect on our own to exercise our option to have the Merger Agreement released from escrow on or prior to April 15, 2009, at which time the Merger Agreement would have been deemed “executed”. The release of the Merger Agreement does not require that we close the merger, which remains subject to additional closing conditions, including the consent of our lenders. Upon consummation of the closing of the merger, the License Agreement would terminate. Costs of $800 associated with this transition have been expensed as of December 31, 2008.
As TrafficLand qualifies as a variable interest entity, we considered qualitative and quantitative factors to determine if we are the primary beneficiary pursuant to FIN 46(R) of this variable interest entity. In connection with the TrafficLand arrangement, as of December 31, 2008 we do not hold an equity interest or a debt interest in the variable interest entity, and we did not absorb a majority of the expected losses or residual returns. Therefore we do not qualify as the primary beneficiary and, accordingly, we have not consolidated this entity.
On March 29, 2006, the Company’sour cost method investment in The Australia Traffic Network Pty Limited (“ATN”) was converted to 1,540 shares of Commoncommon stock of Global Traffic Network, Inc. (“GTN”) in connection with the initial public offering of GTN on that date. The investment in GTN valued at $10,042 at December 31, 2007,was sold during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and we received proceeds of approximately $12,741 and realized a gain of $12,420. Such gain is classifiedincluded as an available for sale security and included in other assetsa component of Other Income/(Loss) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the unrealized gain asStatement of December 31, 2007 is included in unrealized gain on available for sale securities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.Operations.
On October 28, 2005, the Companywe became a limited partner of POP Radio, LP (“POP Radio”) pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement dated as of the same date. As part of the transaction, effective January 1, 2006, the Companywe became the exclusive sales representative of the majority of advertising on the POP Radio network for five years, until December 31, 2010, unless earlier terminated by the express terms of the sales representative agreement. The Company holdsWe hold a 20% limited partnership interest in POP Radio. No additional capital contributions are required by any of the limited partners. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method. The initial investment balance wasde minimis, and the Company’sour equity in earnings of POP Radio through December 31, 20072008 wasde minimis.
On September 29, 2006, the Company,we, along with the other limited partners of POP Radio, elected to participate in a recapitalization transaction negotiated by POP Radio with Alta Communications, Inc. (“Alta”), in return for which the Companywe received $529 on November 13, 2006 which was recorded within Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, if and when Alta elects to exercise warrants it received in connection with the transaction, the Company’sour limited partnership interest in POP Radio will decrease from 20% to 6%.

 

F-15F-18


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
NOTE 6 — Debt:
Long-term debt consists of the following at:
         
  December 31, 
  2007  2006 
Revolving Credit Facility/Term Loan $145,000  $170,000 
4.64% Senior Unsecured Notes due on November 30, 2009  50,000   50,000 
5.26% Senior Unsecured Notes due on November 30, 2012  150,000   150,000 
Fair market value of Swap .  244   (3,140)
       
         
  $345,244  $366,860 
       
         
  2008  2007 
         
Revolving Credit Facility/Term Loan $41,000  $145,000 
4.64% Senior Notes
due on November 30, 2009
  51,475   50,000 
5.26% Senior Notes
due on November 30, 2012
  154,503   150,000 
Deferred derivative gain  2,075     
Fair market value of Swap     244 
       
  $249,053  $345,244 
       
On October 31, 2006 the Companywe amended itsour existing senior loan agreement with a syndicate of banks led by JP Morgan Chase Bank and Bank of America. The facility,Facility, as amended, is comprised of an unsecured five-year $120,000 term loan and a five-year $150,000 revolving credit facility which was automatically reduced to $125,000 effective September 28, 2007 (collectively the “Facility”).2007. In connection with the original closing of the Facility on March 3, 2004, the Companywe borrowed the full amount of the term loan, the proceeds of which were used to repay the outstanding borrowings under a prior facility. Interest on the Facility is variable and is payable at a maximum of the prime rate plus an applicable margin of up to .25% or LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 1.25%, at the Company’sour option. The applicable margin is determined by the Company’sour Total Debt Ratio, as defined in the underlying agreements. The Facility contains covenants relating to dividends, liens, indebtedness, capital expenditures and restricted payments, as defined, interest coverage and leverage ratios.
On December 3, 2002 the Companywe issued, through a private placement, $150,000 of ten year Senior Notes due November 30, 2012 (interest at a fixed rate of 5.26%) and $50,000 of seven year Senior Notes due November 30, 2009 (interest at a fixed rate of 4.64%, collectively referred to as “Senior Notes” or “Notes”). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in May and November. The Notes, which arewere unsecured, contain covenants relating to leverage and interest coverage ratios that are identical to those contained in the Company’sour Facility. The Notes may be prepaid at the option of the Companyus upon proper notice and by paying principal, interest and an early payment penalty.
In addition, the Companywe entered into a seven-year interest rate swap agreement covering $25,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowings under the Senior Notes to effectively float the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 74 basis points and two ten-year interest rate swap agreements covering $75,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowings under the Senior Notes to effectively float the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. In total, the swaps covered $100,000 which represented 50% of the notional amount of Senior Notes. In November 2007, one of the ten-year interest rate swap agreements covering $50,000 nationalnotional value was cancelled, resulting in a payment of $576 to the counter-party. In December 2008, we terminated the remaining interest rate swaps, resulting in cash proceeds of $2,150, which has been classified as a financing cash inflow in our Statement of Cash Flows. The resulting gain of $2,150 from the termination of the derivative contracts is being amortized over the life of the debt.
AtOn December 31, 2007, the Companywe had available borrowings under the Facility, subject to the restrictions of the Company’sour covenants, of approximately $44,000. Additionally, at December 31, 2007, the Companywe had borrowed $145,000 under the Facility at a weighted-average interest rate of 6.8% (including the applicable margin of LIBOR plus 1.125%). As of December 31, 2006, the Company had borrowed $170,000 under the Facility at a weighted-average interest rate of 6.3% (including applicable margin).

F-16


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
The aggregate maturities of debt for the next five years and thereafter, pursuant to the Company’s debt agreements as in effect at December 31, 2007, are as follows (excludes market value adjustments):
     
Year    
2008   
2009 $195,000 
2010   
2011   
2012  150,000 
    
  $345,000 
    
The Company’s bank facility matures in February 2009. Accordingly, the Company must refinance its bank facility, develop new funding sources and/or raise additional capital. If the Company is unable to refinance, identify new funding sources and/or raise additional capital, it may not be able to repay the facility upon maturity. In addition, if the Company’s operating results continue to decline, it may cause the Company to seek a waiver or further amendments to their debt covenants. If we are unable to refinance or repay our debt at maturity, it could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s business continuity, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Effective February 28, 2008 (with the exception of clause (v) which was effective March 3, 2008), the Companywe amended the Facility to: (i)(1) provide security to our lenders (including holders of our Notes), (ii); (2) reduce the amount of the revolving credit facility to $75,000, (iii)$75,000; (3) increase the applicable margin on LIBOR loans to 1.75% and on prime rate loans to 0.75%, (iv); (4) change the allowable Total Debt Ratio to 4.0 times itsour Annualized Consolidated Operating Cash Flow through the remaining term of the Facility, (v)Facility; (5) eliminate the provision that deemed the termination of the CBS Radio Management Agreement an event of defaultdefault; and (vi)(6) include covenants prohibiting the payment of dividends and restricted payments. As noted above, as a result of providing the banks in the Facility with a security interest in our assets, the note holders were also provided with security pursuant to the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.

F-19


As discussed in Note 1, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we failed to pay our most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect of the existing Senior Notes and were not in compliance with our maximum leverage ratio covenant at December 31, 2008. Both of these events constitute a separate default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. In addition, on February 27, 2009, our outstanding Facility matured and became due and payable in its entirety. We did not pay such amount, which also constitutes an event of default under the Facility and the Senior Notes. Our lenders have not sought to exercise remedies that may be available to them under applicable law or their respective existing debt agreements. The parties are currently working towards a refinancing of all of our outstanding indebtedness (approximately $247,000), however, there can be no assurance that the parties will consummate the refinancing or that our lenders will not seek to exercise remedies that may be available to them prior to any such consummation. Accordingly, the debt is classified as current in the accompanying financial statements. The total debt obligation included in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 includes unpaid interest due in respect to the existing Senior Notes of $5,900.
On March 3, 2009, we reached a non-binding agreement in principle with our existing lenders to refinance all of our outstanding indebtedness (see Note 20 — Subsequent Events). The closing of these transactions remain subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation by us, our existing lenders, a new institutional lender and Gores, and customary closing conditions (antitrust regulatory approval was received on March 20, 2009). No assurance can be given that any of these parties will execute definitive documentation or that any of the contemplated transactions will occur at all. Failure to reach an agreement would have a material and adverse effect on us and, accordingly, raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The aggregate maturities of debt for the next four years and thereafter, pursuant to our debt agreements including unpaid interest as in effect at December 31, 2008, are as follows (excludes market value adjustments):
     
Year    
2009 $246,978 
2010   
2011   
2012   
    
  $246,978 
    
NOTE 7 — Financial Instruments:
Interest Rate Risk Management
In order to achieve a desired proportion of variable and fixed rate debt, the Companywe entered into a seven yearseven-year interest rate swap agreement covering $25,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowing to effectively float the majority of the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 74 basis points and two ten year interest rate swap agreements covering $75,000 notional value of itsour outstanding borrowing to effectively float majority of the interest rate at three-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. In total, the swaps initially covered $100,000, which represented 50% of the notional amount of senior unsecured notes.Senior Notes. These swap transactions allow the Companyus to benefit from short-term declines in interest rates while having the long-term stability of the other 50% of Senior Notes of fairly low fixed rates. In November 2007, the Companywe cancelled one of the ten yearten-year swap agreements covering $50,000 notional value, by paying the counter-party $576. The instruments meet all of the criteria of a fair-value hedge and are classified in the same category as the item being hedged in the accompanying balance sheet. The Company hasWe have the appropriate documentation, including the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, identification of the hedged instrument, the hedge item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness offsets the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value. In December 2008, we terminated the remaining interest rate swaps, resulting in cash proceeds of $2,150, which has been classified as a financing cash inflow in our Statement of Cash Flows. The resulting gain of $2,150 from the termination of the derivative contracts is being amortized over the life of the debt.
At December 31, 2007, prior to the Companyunwinding of the swaps as described above, we had the following interest rate swaps:
                 
  Interest Rate 
Maturity Dates Notional Principal Amount  Paid (1)  Received  Variable Rate Index 
November 2009 $25,000   5.08   3.91  3 Month LIBOR
November 2012 $25,000   5.08   4.41  3 Month LIBOR
(1) The interest rate paid at December 31, 2006 was 5.37%.

F-20


The estimated fair valuesvalue of the Company’sour interest rate swaps at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $244 and $3,140 respectively and werewas $244. This balance was included in other assets or accrued expenses, respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

F-17


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’sOur financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, borrowings and interest rate contracts. At December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. TheIn 2008, the estimated fair values of the borrowings were valued based on the current agreement in principle related to the refinancing as discussed in more detail in Note 20 — Subsequent Events. In 2007, the estimated fair values of other financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures, determined based on broker quotes or quoted market pricesquotes or rates for the same or similar instruments, and the related carrying amounts are as follows:
                                
 December 31, 2007 December 31, 2006  December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair  Carrying Fair Carrying Fair 
 Amount Value Amount Value  Amount Value Amount Value 
  
Borrowings (Short and Long Term) $345,000 $345,732 $370,000 $366,860  249,053 158,100 345,000 345,732 
  
Risk management contracts:  
Interest rate swaps 244 244  (3,140)  (3,140)   244 244 
 
Series A Preferred Stock 75,000 50,000   
Credit Concentrations
The CompanyWe continually monitors itsmonitor our positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions that are counterparties to itsour financial instruments, and doesdo not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
The Company’sOur receivables do not represent a significant concentration of credit risk at December 31, 2007,2008, due to the widebroad variety of customers and markets in which the Company operates.we operate.
NOTE 8 — Fair Value Measurements:
SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflect a company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs). In accordance with SFAS No. 157, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

F-21


SFAS No. 157 requires the use of observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for, at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008. These amounts are included in the Other Assets in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
             
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:            
Investments $433  $  $ 
          
 
Total Assets $433  $  $ 
          
NOTE 9 — Shareholders’ Equity:Equity and Series A Preferred Stock:
TheOur authorized capital stock of the Company consists of Commoncommon stock, Class B Stockstock and Series A Preferred Stock. CommonOur common stock is entitled to one vote per share while Class B Stockstock is entitled to 50 votes per share. Class B Stockstock is convertible to Commoncommon stock on a share-for-share basis.
The Company’sIn 2005, our Board of Directors has approved plansauthorized us to purchaserepurchase shares of the Company’s Commoncommon stock to enhance shareholder value. The CompanyWe did not purchase any shares in 2008 or 2007.
In 2006, the Company purchased 750 shares for approximately $11,044, and in 2005 purchased 8,015 shares for approximately $160,604. At December 31,May 2007, the Company had authorizationBoard of Directors elected to repurchase up to $290,490discontinue the payment of its Common Stock, however the Company does not plan on repurchasing any additional share in the foreseeable future.
a dividend. On March 6, 2007, the Company’sour Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.02 for each issued and outstanding share of Commoncommon stock and $0.016 for each issued and outstanding share of Class B stock. In May 2007, the Board of Directors elected to discontinue the payment of a dividend. The Company doesDividends were not plan on declaring dividends for the foreseeable future.declared in 2008.
On February 2, April 18,March 3, 2008 and August 7, 2006,March 24, 2008, we announced the Company’s Boardclosing of Directors declared cash dividendsthe sale and issuance of $0.10 for each issued and outstanding share7,143 shares (14,286 shares in the aggregate) of Commonour common stock and $0.08to Gores Radio Holdings, LLC (together with certain related entities, “Gores”), an entity managed by The Gores Group, LLC at a price of $1.75 per share for each issued and outstanding sharean aggregate purchase amount of Class B stock. On November 7, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.02 for each issued and outstanding share of Common stock and $0.016 for each issued and outstanding share of Class B stock.$25,000.
On April 29, August 3, and November 2, 2005,June 19, 2008, we completed a $75,000 private placement of the Company’s BoardSeries A Preferred Stock with an initial conversion price of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.10$3.00 per share for each issued and outstanding sharefour-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of Common10,000 shares of our common stock in three approximately equal tranches with exercise prices of $5.00, $6.00 and $0.08$7.00 per share, respectively, to Gores Radio Holdings, LLC.
The holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends at a rate of 7.5% per annum, compounded quarterly, which are accrued daily and added to the liquidation preference (initially equal to $1,000 per share, plus accrued dividends). We may redeem the Series A Preferred Stock in whole or in part four years and six months after the original date of issuance. Thereafter, if the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding on the fifth anniversary of the original date of issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 15.0% per annum. If the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding on the 66th month anniversary of the original issue date, the liquidation preference increases by 50%. In addition to the dividends specified above, if dividends are declared or paid by us on the common stock, then such dividends shall be declared and paid on the Series A Preferred Stock on a pro rata basis. As such the Series A Preferred Stock is considered a participating security as defined in SFAS No. 128 — Earnings Per Share.
The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holders, at any time and from time to time, into a number of shares of common stock equal to the Liquidation Preference divided by the conversion price (initially, $3.00 per share, subject to adjustment for each issued and outstandingstock dividends, subdivisions, reclassifications, combinations or similar type events). After December 20, 2010, we may cause the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock if the per share closing price of Class B stock.common stock equals or exceeds $4.00 for 60 trading days in any 90 trading day period or if we sell $50,000 or more of our common stock to a third party at a price per share equal to or greater than $4.00.

 

F-18F-22


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(The Series A Preferred Stock was issued with a deemed liquidation clause that provides that the security becomes redeemable at the election of the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the event of a consolidation or merger by us, as defined, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. In thousands except per share amounts)
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) D-98, the Series A Preferred Stock is required to be classified as mezzanine equity because a change of our control could occur without our approval and thus redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock is not solely under our control. In addition, as it is not probable the Series A Preferred Stock will become redeemable; we have not adjusted the initial carrying amount of the Series A Preferred Stock to its redemption amount or accreted the 7.5% cumulative dividend at the balance sheet date. Through December 31, 2008, the Series A Preferred Stock accumulated dividends were $3,081 and as a result, the Liquidation Preference as defined was $78,081 at December 31, 2008.
The warrants had a fair value of $440 on the date of issuance. The proceeds from the sale were allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and warrants based upon their relative fair values at the date of issuance. Accordingly, the fair value of the warrants is included in Additional Paid-in Capital.
On March 16, 2009, we were delisted from the NYSE and at this time, we do not have any immediate plans to list on an alternate exchange such as Nasdaq or Amex, which means our common stock will continue to be lightly traded.
NOTE 910 — Equity-Based Compensation:
Equity Compensation Plans
The CompanyWe established stock option plans in 1989 (the “1989 Plan”) and 1999 (the “1999 Plan”) which provide for the granting ofallow us to grant options to directors, officers and key employees to purchase Company Commonour common stock at its market value on the date the options are granted. Under the 1989 Plan, 12,600 shares were reserved for grant through March 1999. The 1989 Plan expired, but certain grants made under the 1989 Plan remain outstanding at December 31, 2007.2008. On September 22, 1999, the shareholders ratified the 1999 Plan, which authorized theus to grant of up to 8,000 shares of Commoncommon stock. Options granted under the 1999 Plan generally become exercisable after one year in 33% to 20% increments per year and expire within ten years from the date of grant.
On May 19, 2005, the Board modified the 1999 Plan by deleting the provisions of the 1999 Plan that provided for a mandatory annual grant of 10 stock options to outside directors. Also, on May 19, 2005, theour shareholders of the Company approved the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”). Among other things, the 2005 Plan provides for the granting ofallows us to grant restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of the Company. A. When it was adopted, a maximum of 9,200 shares of Commoncommon stock of the Company iswas authorized for the issuance of awards under the 2005 Plan.
Beginning on May 19, 2005, outside directors automatically receive a grant of RSUs equal to $100 in value on the date of each Company annual meeting of shareholders. Newly appointed outside directors receive an initial grant of RSUs equal to $150 in value on the date such director is appointed to the Company’sour Board. SuchThese awards are governed by the 2005 Plan.
Options and restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan generally vest in 25%, 33% or 50% increments per year, commencing on the anniversary date of each grant, and options expire within ten years from the date of grant. RSUs awarded to directors generally vest over a three-year period in equal one-third33% increments per year. Directors’ RSUs vest automatically, in full, upon a change in control or upon their retirement, as defined in the 2005 Plan. RSUs are payable in newly issued shares of the Company’s Commonour common stock. Recipients of restricted stock and RSUs are entitled to receive dividend equivalents (subject to vesting) when and if the Company payswe pay a cash dividend on its Commonour common stock. Such dividend equivalents are payable, in newly issued shares of Commoncommon stock, only upon the vesting of the related restricted shares.
Restricted stock has the same cash dividend and voting rights as other Commoncommon stock and, once issued, is considered to be currently issued and outstanding.outstanding (even when unvested). Restricted stock and RSUs have dividend equivalent rights equal to the cash dividend paid on Commoncommon stock. RSUs do not have the voting rights of Commoncommon stock, and the shares underlying the RSUs are not considered to be issued and outstanding.
At December 31, 2007, there were 3,998 shares available for grant under the 2005 Plan and 4,382 shares available for grant under the 1999 Plan. No shares may be issued under the 1999 Plan after March 31, 2009.
Adoption of SFAS 123R
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for equity-based compensation under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB 25 and the related Interpretations, as permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.” No share based compensation expense was recognized in the Statement of Operations as all option grants had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying Common stock on the date of grant and the number of shares was fixed, except for a non-cash stock compensation charge of $400 recorded in 2005 in connection with the grant of RSUs to certain individuals.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R eliminated the alternative set forth in APB 25 allowing companies to use the intrinsic value method of accounting and required that companies record expense for stock compensation on a fair value based method. In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company elected to utilize the modified retrospective transition alternative and has, therefore, restated all prior periods to reflect stock compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123R. As a result, income before income taxes and net income in 2005 were reduced by $11,286 and $6,797, respectively.outstanding until they vest.

 

F-19F-23


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires that cash flows resulting from tax deductions that are in excess of the compensation costs recognized for those options (known as Windfall Tax Benefits) be classified as financing cash flows.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2007, 2006 and 2005:2008:
                                
 2007 2006 2005  2008 
 Weighted Weighted Weighted  Weighted 
 Average Average Average  Average 
 Exercise Exercise Exercise  Exercise 
 Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price  Shares Price 
Outstanding, beginning of year 6,086 $23.84 7,788 $25.07 7,996 $24.90  3,888 $21.86 
Granted 361 $5.82 806 $13.98 624 $20.25  6,588 $1.36 
Exercised    (45) $8.54  (334) $9.13    
Cancelled, forfeited or expired  (2,559) $24.31  (2,463) $24.78  (498) $26.98   (3,476) $11.76 
          
  
Outstanding, end of year 3,888 $21.86 6,086 $23.84 7,788 $25.07  7,000 $7.52 
          
At December 31, 20072008, there were 2,7461,743 vested and exercisable options with a weighted average exercise price of $24.00,$24.28, aggregate intrinsic value of $0, and weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.13.60 years. Additionally, at December 31, 2007, 1,4562008, 4,655 options were expected to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $16.48,$2.05, and weighted average remaining term of 5.908.64 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of these options was $3.$0. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, was $0, $74,$0, and $3,445$74, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’sour closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal 20072008 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2007.2008. This amount changeschanged based on the fair market value of the Company’s Commonour common stock.
As of December 31, 2007,2008, there was $7,312$3,573 of unearned compensation cost related to stock options granted under theall three of our equity compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.691.48 years. Total compensation expense in 2007, 2006 and 2005 related to stock options was $2,662, $6,835 and $10,170 in 2008, 2007 and $11,2862006 respectively. Of that expense, $2,502, $3,933 $5,651 and $6,721,$5,651, respectively, was included in operating costs in the Statement of Operations and $160, $2,902, $4,519, and $4,565,$4,519, respectively, was included in Corporate,corporate, general and administrative expense in the Statement of Operations.
In 2007, the Company increased its estimated forfeiture rate based on past experience which, as a result,second quarter of 2008, we determined we had the effect of reducingincorrectly continued to expense stock-based equity compensation for certain directors and officers who had resigned. We determined that this error was not significant to any prior period results and accordingly reduced non-cash, stock-based compensation expense by $372 in 2007.

F-20


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
$1,496.
The aggregate estimated fair value of options vesting was $5,976$2,360 during the year ended December 31, 2007.2008. The weighted average fair value of the options granted was $2.39$0.52,$5.372.39 and $5.90$5.37 during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. The estimated fair value of options granted was measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
Risk-Free Interest Rate  4.52%  4.53%  4.0%  2.64%  4.52%  4.53%
Expected Term 5.7 6.2 4.9  4.8 5.7 6.2 
Expected Volatility  40.12%  45.05%  28.97%  55.99%  40.12%  45.05%
Expected Dividend Yield  0.79%  2.80%  1.16%  0.00%  0.79%  2.80%
The risk-free interest rate for periods within the life of the option is based on a blend of U.S. Treasury bond rates. Beginning with options granted after January 1, 2006, the expected term assumption has been calculated using the “shortcut method” as permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.based on historical data. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Companywe set the expected term equal to the applicable vesting period. The expected volatility assumption used by the Companyus is based on the historical volatility of the Company’sour stock. The dividend yield represents the expected dividends on the Companyour common stock for the expected term of the option.

F-24


Additional information related to options outstanding at December 31, 2007,2008, segregated by grant price range, is summarized below:
             
          Remaining 
      Weighted  Weighted 
      Average  Average 
  Number of  Exercise  Contractual 
  Options  Price  Life (In Years) 
Options Outstanding at Exercise Price Ranges of:            
$1.87-$6.17  203  $5.54   9.19 
$6.57-$9.88  53   7.29   8.87 
$10.09-$19.93  1,258   15.31   4.70 
$20.25-$26.96  1,190   21.32   5.38 
$30.19-$38.34  1,184   32.75   4.53 
            
   3,888  $21.86   5.14 
            

F-21


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
             
          Remaining 
      Weighted  Weighted 
      Average  Average 
  Number of  Exercise  Contractual 
  Options  Price  Life (In Years) 
Options Outstanding at Exercise Price of:            
$0.00 – $1.87  3,878  $0.96   8.75 
$1.87 – $6.16  1,166   2.14   9.16 
$6.37 – $9.88  28   6.63   7.90 
$10.09 – $19.93  495   15.35   4.43 
$20.25 – $26.96  733   21.28   3.93 
$30.19 – $38.34  700   32.72   3.43 
          
   7,000  $7.50   7.47 
Restricted Stock
The Company hasWe have awarded restricted shares of Commonrestricted stock to certain key employees. The awards have restriction periods tied solely to employment and vest over periods ranging from 2 to 4 years. The cost of these restricted stock awards, calculated as the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant, net of estimated forfeitures, is expensed ratably over the vesting period. There were no restricted shares granted in 2005.
The following table summarized the restricted stock activity for 2007 and 2006:2008:
                        
 2007 2006  2008 
 Weighted Avg Weighted Avg  Weighted Avg 
 Grant Date Grant Date  Grant Date 
 Fair Value Fair Value  Fair Value 
 Shares Per Share Shares Per Share  Shares Per Share 
  
Unvested, beginning of year 326 $13.06 0 $0.00  950 $7.56 
Granted 880 $6.16 353 $13.15  41 $0.63 
Converted to Common Stock  (76) $13.28 0 $0.00 
Coverted to Common Stock  (363) $6.65 
Forfeited  (180) $8.27  (27) $14.16   (264) $7.67 
        
  
Unvested, end of year 950 $8.62 326 $13.06  364 $7.55 
        
As of December 31, 2007,2008, there was $4,511$2,173 of unearned compensation cost related to restricted stock grants. The unearned compensation is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.061.11 years. Total compensation expense recognized in 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to restricted stock is $2,162 ($1,772 included in operating costs and $390 in corporate, general and administrative expense), $1,921 ($1,453 included in operating costs and $468 in corporate, general and administrative expense) and $795 ($694 included in operating costs and $101 in corporate, general and administrative expense), respectively.
RSUs
The Company hasWe have awarded RSUs to Board members and certain key executives, which vest over three and four years, respectively. The cost of the RSUs, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, net of estimated forfeitures, is expensed ratably over the vesting period, or period to retirement eligibility (in the case of directors) if shorter.

F-25


The following table summarizes RSU activity for 2007, 2006 and 2005:2008:
        
                         2008 
 2007 2006 2005  Weighted Avg 
 Weighted Avg Weighted Avg Weighted Avg  Grant Date 
 Grant Date Grant Date Grant Date  Fair Value 
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value  Shares Per Share 
 Shares Per Share Shares Per Share Shares Per Share  
Outstanding, beginning of year 226 $13.06 101 $18.07 0 $0.00  230 $9.15 
Granted 115 $5.63 189 $11.89 105 $18.15  1,093 $0.69 
Dividend equivalents 1 $6.87 8 $8.27 1 $19.41   
Converted to Common stock  (71) $12.40  (28) $16.15 
Coverted to Common Stock  (107) $8.52 
Forfeited  (41) $15.12  (44) $16.64  (5) $16.64   
          
  
Outstanding, end of year 230 $9.15 226 $13.06 101 $18.07  1,216 $1.60 
            
  
Vested, end of year 18 15 0  31 
          
  
Unvested, end of year 212 211 101  1,185 
          
As of December 31, 2007,2008, there was $879$1,010 of unearned compensation cost. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.571.67 years. Total compensation expense recognized related to RSUs in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $618, $850 and 2005 was $850, $1,304, and $400, respectively. These costs are included in Corporate, Generalcorporate, general and Administrativeadministrative expense in the accompanying Statement of Operations.
NOTE 11 — Other Income/(Loss):
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold marketable securities for total proceeds of approximately $12,741 and realized a gain of $12,420. Such gain is included as a component of other income/(loss) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
NOTE 12 — Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Comprehensive income (loss) reflects the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive net income (loss) represents net income or loss adjusted for net unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities. Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
             
Net (Loss) Income $(427,563) $24,368  $(469,453)
             
Unrealized gain on marketable securities net effect of income taxes  6,732   1,385   4,570 
             
Adjustment for gains included in net income  (12,420)       
          
             
Comprehensive (Loss) Income $(433,251) $25,753  $(464,883)
          

 

F-22F-26


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
NOTE 1013 — Income Taxes:
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
        
Current  
Federal $18,466 $26,304 $48,682  $(1,220) $18,466 $26,304 
State 3,738 3,588 7,988  367 3,738 3,588 
              
 $22,204 $29,892 $56,670  $(853) $22,204 $29,892 
              
  
Deferred  
Federal  (5,542)  (18,537)  (6,421)  (11,790)  (5,542)  (18,537)
State  (938)  (2,546)  (1,030)  (2,117)  (938)  (2,546)
              
  (6,480)  (21,083)  (7,451)  (13,907)  (6,480)  (21,083)
              
Income Tax Expense $15,724 $8,809 $49,219 
Income (Benefit) Tax Expense $(14,760) $15,724 $8,809 
              
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities on the Company’sour balance sheet and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’sour deferred tax assets and liabilities follow:
        
         2008 2007 
 2007 2006  
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Property and equipment $2,404 $4,122  $5,076 $2,404 
Investment 3,709 2,876  166 3,709 
Other 488 227  295 488 
          
Total deferred tax liabilities $6,601 $7,225  $5,537 $6,601 
          
Deferred tax assets:  
Goodwill, intangibles and other 6,673 6,249  6,487 6,673 
Allowance for doubtful accounts 1,321 1,665  1,379 1,321 
Deferred Compensation 1,443 1,509  1,444 1,443 
Equity Based Compensation 11,401 15,057  8,460 11,401 
Accrued expenses and other  237  4,016  
          
Total deferred tax assets $20,838 $24,717  $21,786 $20,838 
          
Net deferred tax assets $14,237 $17,492  $16,249 $14,237 
          
  
Net deferred tax asset — current $1,321 $1,666  $2,029 $1,321 
          
Net deferred tax asset — long term $12,916 $15,826  $14,220 $12,916 
          
We determined, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax asset will be realized. We have experienced a long history of taxable income which would enable us to carryback any potential future net operating losses and taxable temporary differences that can be used as a source of income. As such, no valuation allowance was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. We will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance at each future reporting period.
The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’sour effective income tax rate is as follows:
            
 Year Ended December 31, 
             2008 2007 2006 
 2007 2006 2005  
Federal statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
State taxes net of federal benefit 3.3  (0.2) 3.5  0.3 3.3  (0.2)
Non-deductible portion of goodwill Impairment   (36.6)    (31.8)   (36.6)
Other 0.9  (0.1) 0.2   (0.2) 0.9  (0.1)
              
Effective tax rate  39.2%  (1.9%)  38.7%  3.3%  32.2%  (1.9%)
              

F-27


The 2008 effective income tax rate was impacted by the 2008 goodwill impairment charge being substantially non-deductible for tax purposes. The 2007 effective income tax rate benefited from a change in New York State tax law on our deferred tax balance (approximately $100). The 2006 income tax provision was impacted by the 2006 goodwill impairment and related deferred tax attributes.
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, $0, $0 and 2005, $0, $12, and $861, respectively, of windfall tax benefits attributable to employee stock exercises were allocated to shareholders’ equity.
The CompanyWe adopted FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” effective January 1, 2007 that resulted in no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. At December 31, 2007, the Company2008, we had $6,470$6,402 of unrecognized tax benefits. The Company classifiesWe classified interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The Company recorded $1,440As of interest expense in its Statement of Operations. The total amountDecember 31, 2007, we had $2,105 of accrued interest and penalties. The accrued interest and penalties onincreased to $2,510 at December 31, 2007 was $2,105.

F-23


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
2008. For the year-ended December 31, 2008, we recognized in our consolidated statement of earnings $405 of interest and penalties.
    
 Unrecognized     
 Tax Benefits  Unrecognized Tax Benefit 
Balance at January 1, 2007 $7,513  $7,513 
Additions for current year tax positions   119 
Additions for prior year tax positions 119 
Settlements  (456)
Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations  (706)
   
Balance at December 31, 2007 $6,470 
   
Additions for tax positions 533 
Settlements  (456)  (444)
Reductions related to expiration of statue of limitations  (706)  (157)
      
Balance at December 31, 2007 $6,470 
Balance at December 31, 2008 $6,402 
      
The Company believesWe believe it is reasonably possible that a reduction in a range of $5,600 to $5,800 ofwithin the next twelve months, the entire unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months as a result of projected audit settlements. balance will reverse.
Substantially all of the Company’sour unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
With few exceptions, the Company isWe are no longer subject to U.S. federal income examinations for years before 2005.
With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to state and local or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.
During 2008 we reported a federal net operating loss of approximately $2,700, for which we intend to prepare a Federal carryback claim. Accordingly, we have recorded an income tax receivable of $900. The states in which we operate generally do not permit the carryback of net operating losses. As a result, we must carry any related 2008 state net operating losses forward to be applied against future taxable income. We have recorded a deferred tax years 2003benefit of approximately $100 to reflect the expected utilization of these states and forward remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.local net operating losses in future periods.

F-28


NOTE 1114 — Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company hasWe have various non-cancelable, long-term operating leases for office space and equipment. In addition, the Company iswe are committed under various contractual agreements to pay for talent, broadcast rights, research, the CBS Radio Representation Agreementnews and the Management Agreement with CBS Radio.other services. The approximate aggregate future minimum obligations under such operating leases and contractual agreements for the five years after December 31, 20072008 and thereafter, are set forth below:
                 
  Leases       
Year Capital  Operating  Other  Total 
2008 $960  $6,750  $106,583  $114,293 
2009  960   6,794   53,546   61,300 
2010  960   5,461   30,643   37,064 
2011  640   5,008   21,955   27,603 
2012  0   4,417   9,433   13,850 
Thereafter  0   14,663   3,600   18,263 
             
  $3,520  $43,093  $225,760  $272,373 
             
The present value of net minimum payments under capital leases was $3,124 at December 31, 2007.
                 
  Leases       
Year Capital  Operating  Other  Total 
                 
2009  960   9,007   108,442   118,409 
2010  960   6,175   91,724   98,859 
2011  640   5,645   84,915   91,200 
2012     5,546   76,089   81,635 
2013     5,469   71,915   77,384 
Thereafter     18,998   236,538   255,536 
             
   2,560   50,840   669,623   723,023 
Rent expense charged to operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $10,686, $8,523 and 2005 was $8,523, $9,295, and $8,957, respectively.
Included in Other“Other” in the table above is $72,648$575,902 of commitments due to CBS Radio and its affiliates pursuant to variousthe agreements as described in Note 2 — “Related Party Transactions”.

F-24


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
The table does not include amounts payable to CBS Radio pursuant to the new agreement that became effective on March 3, 2008. If such amounts were included, the total contractual obligations would increase by $545,907.
NOTE 1215 — Supplemental Cash Flow and Other Information:
Supplemental information on cash flows, is summarized as follows:
            
             Year Ended December 31, 
 Year Ended December 31,  2008 2007 2006 
 2007 2006 2005  
Cash paid for:  
Interest $24,239 $24,642 $17,134  $10,146 $24,239 $24,642 
Income Taxes 21,814 44,676 39,432  10,179 21,814 44,676 
NOTE 1316 — Restructuring Charges:
In the third quarter of 2008, we announced a plan to restructure the traffic operations of the Metro/Traffic operating segment and to take actions to address underperforming programming and to implement other cost reductions. The modifications to the traffic business are part of a series of reengineering initiatives identified by management to improve the operating and financial performance in the near term, while setting the foundation for profitable long-term growth. In connection with the re-engineering of our traffic operations and other cost reductions, which included the consolidation of leased offices, staff reductions and the elimination of underperforming programming, and was implemented to a significant degree in the last half of 2008, we recorded $14,100 in restructuring charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. We anticipate further charges of approximately $9,700 as additional phases of the original traffic re-engineering and other programs are implemented and finalized in the second quarter of 2009. The total restructuring charges for the traffic re-engineering and other cost savings programs are projected to be approximately $23,800. In addition, we have introduced and will complete new cost reduction programs in 2009. As these programs are implemented, we anticipate that we will incur new incremental costs for severance of approximately $6,000 and contract terminations of $3,100. In total, we estimate we will record aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $32,900, consisting of: (1) $15,500 of severance, relocation and other employee related costs; (2) $7,400 of facility consolidation and related costs; and (3) $10,000 of contract termination costs.
Restructuring charges have been recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for the Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” and SFAS No. 88, “Employer’s Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefit”. We account for one-time termination benefits, contract terminations, asset write-offs, and/or costs to terminate lease obligations less assumed sublease income in accordance with SFAS No. 146, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with restructuring activities. Under SFAS No. 146, we establish a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity, including severance and lease termination obligations and other related costs, when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date that we commit to an exit plan.

F-29


In determining the charges related to the restructuring, we had to make estimates related to the expenses associated with the restructuring. These estimates may vary from actual costs depending, in part, upon factors that may be beyond our control. We will continue to review the status of our restructuring obligations on a quarterly basis and, if appropriate, record changes to these obligations based on management’s most current estimates.
The restructuring charges identified in the Consolidated Statement of Operations are comprised of the following:
                 
  Severance  Facilities Consolidation  Contract    
Restructuring Liability Termination Cost  Related Costs  Termination  Total 
                 
Charges  6,765   831   6,504   14,100 
Payments  (3,487)  (41)  (1,108)  (4,636)
Non-Cash utilization  (80)      (1,600)  (1,680)
             
                 
Balance at December 31, 2008  3,198   790   3,796   7,784 
             
NOTE 17 — Special Charges:
During 2008, we incurred costs relating to the negotiation of a new long-term arrangement with CBS Radio, legal and professional expenses attributable to negotiations relating to refinancing our debt, and consultancy expenses associated with developing a cost savings and re-engineering initiative designed to improve our traffic information and reporting operations. We incurred costs aggregating $4,626 and $1,579 in 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the negotiation of a new long-term arrangement with CBS Radio and for severance obligations related to executive officer changes.
The special charges identified on the Consolidated Statement of Operations are comprised of the following:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
             
Professional and other fees related to the new CBS agreements, $6,624  $3,626  $1,579 
Gores Investment and debt refinancing  5,000       
             
Closing Payment to CBS related to the new CBS agreements     1,000    
             
Severance obligations related to executive officer changes  1,621       
          
             
Re-engineering expenses $13,245  $4,626  $1,579 
          

F-30


NOTE 18 — Segment Information:
We established a new organizational structure in the fourth quarter of 2008, pursuant to which, we manage and report our business in two operating segments: Network and Metro/Traffic. We evaluated segment performance based on segment revenue and segment operating (loss)/income. Administrative functions such as finance, human resources and information systems are centralized. However, where applicable, portions of the administrative function costs are allocated between the operating segments. The operating segments do not share programming or report distribution. In the event any materials and/or services are provided to one operating segment by the other, the transaction is valued at fair market value. Operating costs and total assets are captured discretely within each segment.
Previously reported results of operations are presented to reflect these changes. Revenue, segment operating (loss)/income, depreciation, unusual items, capital expenditures and identifiable assets at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, are summarized below according to these segments. This change did not impact the total consolidated results of operations. We continue to report certain administrative activities under corporate. We are domiciled in the United States with limited international operations comprising less than one percent of our revenue. No one customer represented more than 10% of our consolidated revenue.
Our Network Division produces and distributes regularly scheduled and special syndicated programs, including exclusive live concerts, music and interview shows, national music countdowns, lifestyle short features, news broadcasts, talk programs, sporting events and sports features.
Our Metro/Traffic Division provides traffic reports and local news, weather and sports information programming to radio and television affiliates and their websites.

F-31


             
  Year Ended December 31, 
Net Revenue 2008  2007  2006 
Network $209,532  $218,939  $246,317 
Metro/Traffic  194,884   232,445   265,768 
          
Total Net Revenue $404,416  $451,384  $512,085 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
Segment Operating (Loss) Income 2008  2007  2006 
Network $14,562  $30,943  $38,192 
Metro/Traffic  24,577   64,033   73,173 
          
Total Segment Operating Income $39,139  $94,976  $111,365 
Corporate Expenses  (19,709)  (27,043)  (29,850)
Restructuring and Special Charges  (27,345)  (4,626)  (1,579)
Goodwill Impairment  (430,126)     (515,916)
          
Operating (Loss) Income $(438,041) $63,307  $(435,980)
Interest Expense  (16,651)  (23,626)  (25,590)
Other Income  12,369   411   926 
          
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes $(442,323) $40,092  $(460,644)
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
Depreciation and Amortization 2008  2007  2006 
Network $3,139  $3,152  $3,571 
Metro/Traffic  6,120   6,955   7,453 
Corporate  1,793   9,732   9,733 
          
Total Depreciation and Amortization $11,052  $19,839  $20,757 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
Assets 2008  2007  2006 
Network $92,109  $218,276  $217,700 
Metro/Traffic  80,079   399,144   417,817 
Corporate  32,900   52,337   61,186 
          
Total Assets $205,088  $669,757  $696,703 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
Capital Expenditures 2008  2007  2006 
Network $5,634  $1,800  $751 
Metro/Traffic  1,538   4,042   4,059 
Corporate  141   7   1,071 
          
Total Capital Expenditures $7,313  $5,849  $5,881 
          

F-32


NOTE 19 — Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited):
The following is a tabulation of the unaudited quarterly results of operations. The quarterly results are presented for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
                     
  First  Second  Third  Fourth  For the 
  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Year 
                     
2008                    
                     
Net revenue $106,627  $100,372  $96,299  $101,118  $404,416 
Operating (loss)  (3,000)  (195,609)  (7,555)  (231,877)  (438,041)
Net (loss)  (5,338)  (199,744)  (10)  (222,471)  (427,563)
Net (loss) per share:                    
Basic                    
Common Stock  (0.06)  (1.98)  (0.01)  (2.22)  (4.39)
Class B Stock               
Diluted                    
Common Stock  (0.06)  (1.98)  (0.01)  (2.22)  (4.39)
Class B Stock               
                     
2007                    
                     
Net revenue $113,959  $111,025  $108,083  $118,317  $451,384 
Operating Income  7,262   16,618   19,686   19,741   63,307 
Net income  715   6,897   8,452   8,304   24,368 
Net income per share:                    
Basic                    
Common Stock  0.01   0.08   0.10   0.10   0.28 
Class B Stock  0.02            0.02 
Diluted                    
Common Stock  0.01   0.08   0.10   0.10   0.28 
Class B Stock  0.02            0.02 
In the fourth quarter of 2008 we recorded net adjustments of approximately $2,391 of expense for unused vacation time, a write-off of fixed assets and other miscellaneous items related to other periods. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a decrease to our operating loss of approximately $1,496 for an adjustment to stock-based compensation.
In the third quarter and second quarter of 2007, we recorded net adjustments of approximately $1,000 that had the effect of increasing net income, and 2006.net adjustments of approximately $1,000 that had the effect of reducing net income, respectively. These adjustments were primarily comprised of the reversal of expense accruals offset by predominantly billing/revenue adjustments in the third quarter and overaccruals in the second quarter. In the fourth quarter, we recorded an adjustment of approximately $500 that had the effect of increasing net income related to an error in calculating our health care accrual in the fourth quarter, with no impact on the full year results.
(In thousands, except per share data)We do not believe these adjustments are material to our Consolidated Financial Statements in any quarter or year of any prior period’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, we have not restated any prior period amounts.
                     
  First  Second  Third  Fourth  For the 
  Quarter  Quarter (2)  Quarter (2)  Quarter (2)  Year 
2007                    
Net revenue $113,959  $111,025  $108,083  $118,317  $451,384 
Operating income  7,262   16,618   19,686   19,741   63,307 
Net income  715   6,897   8,452   8,304   24,368 
Net income per share:                    
Basic                    
Common stock  0.01   0.08   0.10   0.10   0.28 
Class B Stock  0.02            0.02 
Diluted                    
Common stock  0.01   0.08   0.10   0.10   0.28 
Class B Stock  0.02            0.02 
2006                    
Net revenue $125,027  $134,461  $118,485  $134,112  $512,085 
Operating (loss) income  (140)  26,717   23,836   (486,393)(1)  (435,980)
Net (loss) income  (3,527)  12,170   10,484   (488,580)  (469,453)
Net (loss) income per share:                    
Basic                    
Common stock  (0.04)  0.14   0.12   (5.68)  (5.46)
Class B Stock  0.08   0.08   0.08   0.02   0.26 
Diluted                    
Common stock  (0.04)  0.14   0.12   (5.68)  (5.46)
Class B Stock  0.08   0.08   0.08   0.02   0.26 
(1)The Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $515,916 in the fourth quarter of 2006.
(2)In the third quarter and second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded net adjustments of approximately $1,000 that had the effect of increasing net income and net adjustments of approximately $1,000 that had the effect of reducing net income, respectively. These adjustments were primarily comprised of the reversal of expense accruals offset by predominantly billing/revenue adjustments in the third quarter and overaccruals in the second quarter. In the fourth quarter, the Company recorded an adjustment of approximately $500 that had the effect of increasing net income related to an error in calculating the Company’s health care accrual. It had no impact on the full year results. The Company does not believe these adjustments are material to its Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, any of the quarters in 2007 or any prior period’s consolidated financial statements. As a result, the Company has not restated any prior period amounts.

 

F-25F-33


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
NOTE 1420 — Subsequent Events:
On March 3, 2008,February 27, 2009, the Company closeddebt outstanding under our Facility matured and became due and payable in its entirety (See Note 6 — Debt). We have not paid such amount, which constitutes an event of default under the transactions contemplated by the Master Agreement dated October 2, 2007 between the Company and CBS Radio. See Note 2 “Related Party Transaction” for a descriptioncredit agreement. In addition, we failed to pay our most recent semi-annual interest payment due in respect of the MasterSenior Notes, which constitutes an event of default under the Note Purchase Agreement and all warrants previously issued to CBS Radio were cancelled on that date.for the Senior Notes.
On March 3, 2008,2009, we reached an agreement in principle with our existing lenders to refinance all of our outstanding indebtedness (approximately $241,000 in principal amount plus unpaid interest) in exchange for: (1) $25,000 in cash; (2) a series of new senior secured notes in an expected aggregate principal amount of $117,500; and (3) 25% of our pro forma common stock. The new notes are expected to mature on July 15, 2012.
As part of the Company announcedrefinancing, it is contemplated that Gores will purchase for cash $25,000 of new preferred stock and guarantee or otherwise provide credit support for a $20,000 unsecured subordinated term loan and a $15,000 senior unsecured revolver. The term loan and revolver are expected to be provided by a new institutional lender and to be used to finance working capital and other general corporate purposes. Upon consummation of the refinancing, after converting its existing Series A Preferred Stock and the new preferred stock it purchases as part of the refinancing, Gores will own approximately 72.5% of our pro forma common stock and acquire control of Westwood One. As a result of the contemplated transactions, existing common stockholders would own approximately 2.5% of our pro forma common stock.
The terms described above and the closing of the salerefinancing transaction remains subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation by us, our existing lenders, the new institutional lender and issuanceGores, and customary closing conditions (antitrust regulatory approval was received on March 20, 2009). No assurance can be given that any of 7,143 shares of Company Common stock to Gores Radio Holdings, LLC (together with certain related entities, “Gores”), an entity managed by The Gores Group, LLC, at a price of $1.75 per share for an aggregate purchase amount of $12.500. At the Company’s option, Gores has agreed to purchase: (i) up to an additional 7,143 shares of common stock at $1.75 per share and (ii) between $50,000 and $75,000 of 7.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with an initial conversion price of $3.00 per share and Warrants (issued in three tranches) to purchase up to 10,000 shares of Company Common stock, such Warrants to be exercisable at $5.00/share, $6.00/share and $7.00/share, respectively. The issuancethese parties will execute definitive documentation or that any of the Preferred Stock iscontemplated transactions will occur at all. The refinancing and the Gores investment are contemplated to occur concurrently with one another and, subject to obtaining shareholder approval. On March 10, 2008, the Company notified Gores that it was exercising its optionforegoing, are anticipated to issue and to sell Gores an additional 7,143 shares of Common stock at $1.75 per share (it is currently anticipated such sale will close on or before March 24, 2008).
On January 11, 2008 and February 25, 2008, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3, respectively (the “Facility Amendments”) to the Facility, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Westwood One, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, as amended, restated or supplemented. Under the terms of the Facility Amendments and the Security Documents (as such term is defined in Amendment No. 2), the Company and each of its subsidiaries pledged and granted a security interest in all of such parties’ assets to the Collateral Trustee, for the benefit of the Lenders and the holders of the Company’s Notes.
Most provisions of the Facility Amendments became effective on February 28, 2008, however, the CBS-related provisions became effective on March 3, 2008.
On February 28, 2008, the following changes to the Facility, among others, became effective (capitalized terms used below but not defined have the meaning set forthoccur in the Facility):
The Total Debt Ratio covenant will remain at 4.00 to 1 through February 28, 2009;
the Revolving Credit Commitments were reduced from $125 million to $75 million;
a Mandatory Prepayments covenant was added which provides that twenty percent (20%) of net cash proceeds from any Equity Issuance will be used to prepay the Loans outstanding under the Facility and upon payment in full of the Term Loans and the termination of the Term Loan Commitments, applied to permanently reduce the Revolving Credit Commitments;
the general basket permitting the payment of dividends and stock repurchases in an amount of up to $36 million was eliminated from the Restricted Payments covenant; and
the Company’s ability to make: (i) $5 million in new Investments (not consisting of Company stock) in Unrestricted Subsidiaries; (ii) loans to officers and directors and (iii) purchases of capital stock of commercial radio businesses were each eliminated from the Investments, Loans and Advances covenant.
On March 3, 2008, the provision deeming terminationsecond quarter of the Management Agreement an event of default and all references to Infinity, INI, the Management Agreement and Management Fees were deleted from the Credit Agreement.2009.

 

F-26F-34


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Amounts outstanding under the Facility will bear interest at a variable interest rate at a maximum of: (x) the prime rate plus an applicable margin of 0.75% or (y) LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.75%, at the Company’s option. Except as expressly provided in the Credit Agreement Amendments, all provisions of the Facility remain unmodified and continue in full force and effect.
On February 28, 2008, the Company and the holders of the Notes entered into a First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, by and between the Company and the Noteholders. Capitalized terms used but not defined below have the meaning set forth in the First Amendment.
The First Amendment, among other things, added certain provisions to the Note Purchase Agreement relating to the grant of a security interest in the Collateral and to Amendment No. 2 to the Facility (described above). The First Amendment also eliminates the restriction on modifying the Management Agreement set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement.

F-27


WESTWOOD ONE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
                                
 Balance at Additions Deductions Balance at  Balance at Additions Deductions Balance at 
 Beginning of Charged to Costs Write-offs and End of  Beginning of Charged to Costs Write-offs and End of 
 Period And Expenses Other Adjustments Period  Period And Expenses Other Adjustments Period 
  
2008 $3,602 $439 $(409) $3,632 
 
2007 $4,387 $139 $(924) $3,602  $4,387 $139 $(924) $3,602 
  
2006 $2,797 $2,323 $(733) $4,387  $2,797 $2,323 $(733) $4,387 
 
2005 $2,566 $2,031 $(1,800) $2,797 

 

F-28F-35


EXHIBIT INDEX
   
ExhibitEXHIBIT  
No.NUMBER (A) DescriptionDESCRIPTION
3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. (14)
3.2Bylaws of Registrant as currently in effect. +
4.1Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, between Registrant and the noteholders parties thereto. (15)
4.1.1First Amendment, dated as of February 28, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, by and between Registrant and the noteholders parties thereto. (34)
10.1Employment Agreement, dated April 29, 1998, between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz. (8) *
10.2Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated October 27, 2003, between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz. (16) *
10.2.1Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated November 28, 2005, between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz (7) *
10.2.2Amendment No. 3, effective January 8, 2008, to the employment agreement by and between Registrant and Norman Pattiz (30)*
10.3Form of Indemnification Agreement between Registrant and its directors and executive officers. (1)
10.4Credit Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank as Administrative Agent. (16)
10.4.1Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 31, 2006, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (23)
10.4.2Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 11, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (26)
10.4.3Amendment No. 3, dated as of February 25, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2004, between Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, the Lenders parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (13)
10.5Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 24, 1987, between Registrant and National Broadcasting Company, Inc. (2)
10.6Agreement and Plan of Merger among Registrant, Copter Acquisition Corp. and Metro Networks, Inc. dated June 1, 1999 (9)
10.7Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan Merger, dated as of August 20, 1999, by and among Registrant, Copter Acquisition Corp. and Metro Networks, Inc. (10)
10.8Employment Agreement, effective May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Paul Gregrey, as amended by Amendment 1 to Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2006. (35) *
10.8.1Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated May 4, 2007, between Registrant and Paul Gregrey (27)*
10.9Employment Agreement, effective October 16, 2004, between Registrant and David Hillman, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2006. (28)*
10.9.1Amendment No. 2 to the Employment Agreement, effective July 10, 2007, between Registrant and David Hillman. (29)*
10.10Registrant Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. (22) *
10.11Amendment to Registrant Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 25, 2005 (19) *
10.12Registrant 1989 Stock Incentive Plan. (3) *
10.13Amendments to Registrant’s Amended 1989 Stock Incentive Plan. (4) (5) *
10.14Leases, dated August 9, 1999, between Lefrak SBN LP and Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. and between Infinity and Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. relating to New York, New York offices. (11)
10.15Form of Stock Option Agreement under Registrant’s Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. (17) *
10.16Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Andrew Zaref. (18) *
10.16.1Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2006, between Registrant and Andrew Zaref (24) *
10.17Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (19) *
10.18Form Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for outside directors (20) *
10.19Form Stock Option Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for directors. (21) *

- 41 -


EXHIBIT
NUMBER (A)DESCRIPTION
10.20Form Stock Option Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non-director participants. (21) *
10.21Form Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non-director participants. (20)*
10.22Form Restricted Stock Agreement under Registrant 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for non-director participants. (20) *
10.23Employment Agreement, effective as of July 16, 2007, by and between Registrant and Gary Yusko. (29)*
10.24Master Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2007, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (31)
10.25Employment Agreement, effective as of January 8, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.26Consent Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2008, made by and among CBS Radio Inc., Registrant, and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.27Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse. (30)*
10.28Letter Agreement, dated February 25, 2008, by and between Registrant and Norman J. Pattiz (32)*
10.29Purchase Agreement, dated February 25, 2008, between Registrant and Gores Radio Holdings, LLC. (32)
10.30Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 3, 2008, between Registrant and Gores Radio Holdings, LLC. (33)
10.31Intercreditor and Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2008, by and among Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, the financial institutions that hold the Notes and The Bank of New York, as Collateral Trustee (34)
10.32Shared Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2008, by and among Registrant, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and The Bank of New York, as Collateral Trustee (34)
10.33Shared Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated as of February 28, 2008, by Registrant, to First American Title Insurance Company, as Trustee, for the benefit of The Bank of New York, as Beneficiary (34)
10.34Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.35Amended and Restated News Programming Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.36Amended and Restated Technical Services Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.37Amended and Restated Trademark License Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.38Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Radio Inc. (33)
10.39Lease for 524 W. 57th Street, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between Registrant and CBS Broadcasting Inc. (33)
10.40Form Westwood One Affiliation Agreement, dated February 29, 2008, between Westwood One, Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of its affiliate, Westwood One Radio Networks, Inc. and CBS Radio Inc., on its behalf and on behalf of certain CBS Radio stations (33)
10.41Form Metro Affiliation Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2008, by and between Metro Networks Communications, Limited Partnership, and CBS Radio Inc., on its behalf and on behalf of certain CBS Radio stations (33)
10.42Employment Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2008, between Registrant and Steven Kalin. (6) *
10.43Employment Agreement, effective as of September 17, 2008, by and between Registrant and Roderick M. Sherwood, III. (36)*
10.44Employment Agreement, effective as of October 20, 2008, by and between Registrant and Gary Schonfeld (37)*
10.45Separation Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2008, by and between Registrant and Thomas F.X. Beusse (38)*
10.46Separation Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2008, by and between Registrant and Paul Gregrey *+
10.47License and Services Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between Metro Networks Communications, Inc. and TrafficLand, Inc. (39)
10.48Employment Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2008, between Registrant and Andrew Hersam. *+

- 42 -


EXHIBIT
NUMBER (A)DESCRIPTION
10.49
Employment Agreement, effective as of April 14, 2008, by and between Registrant and Jonathan Marshall. *+
10.50Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement for senior executives, amending terms in a manner intended to address Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended *+
10.51Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, by and between the Registrant and Steven Kalin, amending terms in a manner intended to address Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended *+
21 List of Subsidiaries. +
23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. +
31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. +
31.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. +
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. **
32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ***
32.2Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ***
 
*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan
+ Filed herewith.
 
*** Furnished herewith.
(A)We agree to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.
(1)Filed as part of Registrant’s September 25, 1986 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)Filed an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 4, 1987 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)Filed as part of Registrant’s March 27, 1992 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s July 20, 1994 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s April 29, 1996 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2008 (filed on February 29, 2008) and incorporated herein by reference.
(14)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(15)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
(16)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
(17)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
(18)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
(19)Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K, dated May 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

- 43 -


(20)Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report of Form 8-K dated March 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(21)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(22)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s April 30, 1999 proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference.
(23)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(24)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(25)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(26)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(27)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(28)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(29)Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated July 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(30)Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated January 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(31)Filed as an exhibit to Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(32)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2008 (filed on February 27, 2008) and incorporated herein by reference.
(33)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(34)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(35)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(36)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(37)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 24, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(38)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(39)Filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

- 44 -