UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082009

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 001-33720


HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 33-1135689
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) 
Identification No.) 

One Capital City Plaza
33503280 Peachtree Road, Suite 1600600
Atlanta, Georgia 3032630305
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(404) 364-5823
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act).
Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o  No x

 
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes xNo o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and smaller“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o  No x

At March 30, 2009, 53,698,29231, 2010, 5,369,785 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were outstanding.  The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by nonaffiliates as of June 30, 2008,2009, was $70,617,793.$5,307,715.
 


Documents incorporated by reference: 
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.


 
 

 

Table of Contents

  Page
   
   
1
67
1718
1718
1718
1718
   
   
1819
1920
2021
2833
2934
5569
5569
5569
   
   
5671
6171
6671
6971
72
   
   
73
   
74
   
75
 

 
 

 


PART I

Forward-looking information

Our disclosure and analysis in this report concerning our operations, cash flows and financial position, including, in particular, the likelihood of our success in expanding our business and our assumptions regarding the regulatory environment and international markets, include forward-looking statements.  Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements.  Although these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that are described more fully in this report in the section titled “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors”.Factors.”  These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this filing and are not intended to give any assurance as to future results.  As a result, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors, except as required by applicable securities laws.


ITEM 1.1.  BUSINESS
 
Overview
 
HSW International, Inc. (“HSW International”HSWI” or the "Company") is an online publishing company that develops and operates Internet businesses focused on providing consumers in the world’s digital economies with locally relevant, high quality information, and ways to connectprovides web platform services that support traditional web publishing combined with each other.social media.  Our international websites published under the HowStuffWorks brand provide readers in China and Brazil with thousands of articles about how the world around them works, serving as destinations for credible, easy-to-understand reference information.  HSW International is the exclusive licensee in China and Brazil for the digital publication of translated content from HowStuffWorks.com, a subsidiary of Discovery Communications, Inc.,’s HowStuffWorks.com, and in China for the digital publication of translated content from World Book Inc., publisherspublisher of World Book Encyclopedia.  Our DailyStrength brand, which was acquired on November 26, 2008, helps hundredsco-founding and continuing development of thousandsthe Sharecare web platforms will create a highly searchable social Q&A healthcare platform organizing and answering the questions of readers share informationhealth, in partnership with Harpo Productions, Sony Pictures Television, Discovery Communications, Jeff Arnold, and support on www.dailystrength.org, a comprehensive health-related social media website.  The acquisition of DailyStrength was completed in part to diversify our business and to publish another product which offers insight on highly relevant topics.Dr. Mehmet Oz.  We generate revenue primarily through the sale of online advertising on our websites.websites and through service fees charged to clients for web platform development and operation services.  We were incorporated in Delaware in March 2006.  Our headquarters are located at One Capital City Plaza, 33503280 Peachtree Road, Suite 1600,600, Atlanta, Georgia  30326.30305.

Recent Developments

Sharecare Transactions

On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with Sharecare, Inc.  (the "Sharecare Transactions"), which was established as a venture between: Dr. Mehmet Oz, a leading cardiac surgeon, health expert and host of “The Dr. Oz Show”; HARPO Productions, producer of “The Oprah Winfrey Show”; Discovery Communications, the world’s largest non-fiction media company; Jeff Arnold, WebMD founder and Discovery Communications’ Chief of Global Digital Strategy; Sony Pictures Television; and HSWI.  Sharecare was created to build a web-based platform that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing a vast array of the questions of health and providing multiple answers from experts, organizations, publishers, and caregivers representing various points of view.

As a result of these transactions, the Company received an equity stake in Sharecare, sold substantially all of the assets of its DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare, agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare, and received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for HSWI's own businesses.  As of March 31, 2010, HSWI owns approximately 18% of Sharecare and has representation on its board of directors.  Our relationship with Sharecare is considered a related party.  Further information about Sharecare is available at http://sharecare.com.


Reverse Stock Split

On February 16, 2010, the Company conducted a reverse split of its common stock, par value $0.001, at a ratio of 10-for-1 (the "Reverse Split"), at which time each share of common stock issued and outstanding was automatically reclassified as and converted into one-tenth of a share of common stock.  All outstanding share amounts included in this document have been retroactively restated to reflect this 10-for-1 Reverse Split.  For comparability purposes, all references to HSWI stock within this document has been adjusted to reflect the effects of the Reverse Split, except where otherwise indicated.

The Reverse Split was approved by HSWI's board of directors on February 3, 2010, and authorized by the Company's shareholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting.  The board of directors believes that the Reverse Split was appropriate in order to maintain continued listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market.  NASDAQ requires that if the closing bid price of shares of our common stock is less than $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days the closing bid price must be $1.00 per share or higher for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days during the 180 calendar days following notification by NASDAQ.  Otherwise, NASDAQ would begin procedures to delist our common stock from trading on the NASDAQ Global Market.  The Reverse Split successfully resulted in our common stock achieving the level necessary to satisfy the $1.00 minimum bid continued listing requirement, and NASDAQ notified HSWI that we regained compliance with continued listing standards.  However, we cannot predict whether the market price of our common stock will remain equal to or in excess of $1.00 as the market price is determined by investors' trades, and may be affected by other factors in addition to the number of shares outstanding, such as our future performance and the overall performance of the stock markets.

Each stockholder’s percentage ownership in the Company and proportional voting power remained unchanged by the Reverse Split, except for those adjustments resulting from shareholders receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares.  In connection with the Reverse Split, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s capital stock was reduced accordingly by a ratio of 10-for-1.

Management

On September 28, 2009, Gregory Swayne was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of HSWI.  Mr. Swayne had been the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2007, and succeeded Henry N. Adorno, who retired from the Company after two years of serving as the Company's principal executive officer.  Prior to joining HSW International in 2006, Mr. Swayne led HowStuffWorks, Inc. as President and Chief Operating Officer and was the co-founder and President of publicly-listed A.D.A.M., Inc., a provider of health information services and benefit management solutions.  Mr. Swayne was elected to the board of directors of HSWI on December 17, 2009, and the board subsequently appointed him to be its Chairman.

Products and Services

ComoTudoFunciona – HowStuffWorks Brazil

We enteredComoTudoFunciona (http://www.hsw.com.br) is Brazil's online source for credible, unbiased and easy-to-understand explanations of how the Brazilian online publishing marketworld actually works.  The Portuguese-language site is the exclusive digital publisher in Brazil of translated and localized content from the leading Discovery Communications brand HowStuffWorks, and is published from HSWI's São Paulo offices.  ComoTudoFunciona was established in March 2007, with the launchand as of our website ComoTudoFunciona (http://hsw.com.br), utilizing the exclusively licensed HowStuffWorks digital content.  At December 31, 2008, we2009, had published approximately 5,500over 6,200 articles that were either (i) articles from the HowStuffWorks content database translated from English to Portuguese, or (ii) originally created content.content or translated and localized from HowStuffWorks.  We are continuing the development of our business strategy in Brazil as we focus on expansion by (i) adding original proprietary digital content designed to meet the information needs of the Brazilian online community, (ii) expanding the amount of translated content from HowStuffWorks, and (iii) refining local marketing and business development strategies.

BoWenWang – HowStuffWorks China

In June 2008, we entered China’s online publishing market utilizing a combination of the contributed assets from HowStuffWorks with the benefit of our predecessor INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses.  Our Beijing-based website BoWenWang (http://www.bowenwang.com.cn) initially launchedis an information and reference website that provides China with encyclopedic knowledge and easy-to-understand explanations of how the world works.  The website is published from Beijing in the Chinese language.  Launched in June 2008, BoWenWang features a combination of HowStuffWorks content translated from English to Chinese and original content createdauthored by ourthe Company, translated and localized articles from the leading Discovery Communications brand HowStuffWorks, and content from World Book, Inc.

BoWenWang is the exclusive digital publisher in China division, including several hundred articles about the Beijing Olympics.of translated HowStuffWorks content.  In September 2008, we entered into an exclusive content partnership with World Book, Inc. to dramatically increase the amount of content published on BoWenWang.  In 2009, World Book will createcreated thousands of original Chinese-language articles providing information on allmany branches of knowledge,
2

including arts, sciences, history, technology, mathematics, sports, and recreation, exclusively for our Chinese website.  At December 31, 2008,2009, we had published approximately 4,400almost 11,000 articles in China.
1


DailyStrength

In November 2008, we acquired Daily Strength, Inc. (“DS”), publisher of the health social networking website DailyStrength (http://www.dailystrength.org).Now owned by Sharecare, DailyStrength.org offers content authored by medical professionals based on current topics, support groups, a treatment directory with definitions, private messaging, one-on-one chat forumsmessage boards and personal goal trackers, and primarily serves English-speaking territories such as the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.  The medical panel of professionals contributes articles and journals providing insight to a number of topics relevant to the DSDailyStrength user group and communities.  Additionally, DSDailyStrength offers users and members the opportunity to launch a communitycommunities for a groupgroups of like-minded individuals regarding a topictopics of personal significance using best-of-breedleading community tools to interact.

On October 30, 2009, we sold substantially all of the assets of DailyStrength to Sharecare as part of the Sharecare Transactions.  We now provide services to Sharecare for the DailyStrength website as described below.  In addition, we own a minority equity position in Sharecare.

Web Platform Services

DS was founded in 2006 by Internet veterans with more than 20 yearsIn 2009, we established Web Platform Services as a new line of experience conceiving, building,business and running communitiesoperating segment, to capitalize on the Company's web including Yahoo, GeoCities, Facebookpublishing and more.  DS hosts more than 500 communities focusedsocial media expertise, and core competency of developing and operating web platforms and Internet businesses.  This segment of our business offers these services to other companies, allowing them to leverage HSWI's established and proven technology platform and web publishing knowledge in the design, development, and operations of their own Internet businesses.

We entered into an agreement with our first client, Sharecare, on issues suchOctober 30, 2009, to design, develop, launch and operate Sharecare's Web 3.0 platform, which will combine traditional web publishing with social media.  As part of this relationship, HSWI received a license to use this Web 3.0 platform for certain of its own businesses.

We developed, launched, and began operating Ask Dr. Oz (http://ask.doctoroz.com) in September 2009 for Sharecare as weight loss, divorce, parenting and illnesses.the first website of our Web Platform Services business.  Ask Dr. Oz is part of The Dr. Oz Show website, the online component to the syndicated television show of the same name.  We intend to expand our Web Platform Services to additional clients in the coming year.

Our History
 
HSW International was formed onin March 14, 2006 as a wholly owned subsidiary of HowStuffWorks, Inc. in order to (i) develop businesses using exclusive digital publishing rights to HowStuffWorks’ content for the countries of China and Brazil, and (ii) effect the merger with INTAC International, Inc. merger (the “INTAC Merger”).  We completed the INTAC Merger in 2007 to assist in the development of our digital content database exclusively licensed from HowStuffWorks by (i) accelerating our obtaining Internet licenses in China for launching our Internet platform, (ii) obtaining INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies to accelerate the growth of our Internet platforms in China, and (iii) providing additional cash flow from INTAC’s established businesses.  These established businesses included services related to wireless telephone training and the development and sale of educational software delivered to customers in China (“INTAC(the “INTAC Legacy Businesses”).  As discussed below, we subsequently sold these legacy businesses were subsequently disposed.businesses.

Our initial focus wasWe initially focused on the online publishing of localized, translated Chinese and Brazilian editions of the HowStuffWorks Internet site,HowStuffWorks.com, utilizing strategies based on those employed by HowStuffWorks, Inc., as tailored to the needs of each localized market. 

In November 2008, we acquired Daily Strength,DailyStrength, Inc. (“DS”), publisher of the health social networking website DailyStrength (http://www.dailystrength.org).  Our, which was included in our social media segment.  The acquisition of DS allowsallowed us to further leverage our web publishing infrastructure, provides us with an opportunity to diversify our initial focus on the emerging economies, and enter the healthcare digital market.  The online healthcare marketopportunity then arose to participate in the United States has matured over the past 10 yearsfounding of Sharecare, and now representsin October 2009 we acquired an equity position in Sharecare, became its development partner, and sold substantially all assets of our DailyStrength business.  As a significant market for online advertising.  Whileresult, social media is no longer an operating segment of HSWI.  The sale of DailyStrength to Sharecare allowed us to become a part of a business that we believe will be significantly larger than DailyStrength alone could achieve, and reduced HSWI's expenses as DailyStrength was not then profitable.  As the global economic credit market hasenvironment remains tenuous and we continue to have lowered expectations for near-term growth in the emerging economies, we believe our diversification into the world’s largest online advertising economy – the United States – provides greater access to digital revenues.

3

HSW International established a new web platform services line of business in 2009, to provide highly customized services and web platforms to other companies seeking cost effective solutions for innovative content-focused websites.  We have licensed certain rights to use the Web 3.0 platform we are developing for Sharecare, allowing us to create new opportunities in the United States and other markets, and we intend to enter into relationships to design, develop, and operate the web platforms for other companies.  Web Platform Services was created to leverage HSWI's expertise in online publishing and provide a source of profitable revenue for the Company.

The INTAC Merger

The INTAC Merger and related transactions were consummated pursuant to a merger agreement dated April 20, 2006, as amended January 29, 2007.  On October 2, 2007, we completed the INTAC Merger and related transactions pursuant to which:

·  HowStuffWorks contributed to us in exchange for shares of our common stock, perpetual, fully paid up, royalty-free, exclusive digital publishing rights to HowStuffWorks’ existing content for the countries of China and Brazil which we are translating and localizing into the predominant languages of China and Brazil.
·  A wholly owned subsidiary of ours was merged into INTAC, with INTAC surviving as our wholly owned subsidiary,Our common stock became publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HSWI,” and holdersshareholders of INTAC common stock, then trading on NASDAQ under the symbol "INTN," received one shareshares of our common stockHSWI in exchange for each of their shares of INTAC common stock.INTAC.
·  Certain investors (referred to in this report as American investors)Investors purchased or agreed to purchase shares of our common stock having an aggregate value of approximately $39.4 million, of which $22.5 million and $16.9 million (both before expenses) were received in October 2007, and January and February 2008, respectively.  Shelf registration statements covering the resale of these shares were subsequently filed.
·  Our stock became publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HSWI” in connection with the INTAC Merger.  Prior to the INTAC Merger, INTAC’s common stock was traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “INTN”.


2



·  In connection with and as a condition of the INTAC Merger, INTAC sold its wireless handset and prepaid calling cards distribution businesses (“distribution companies”), to an entity controlled by Wei Zhou, CEO, director and significant stockholder of INTAC prior to the INTAC Merger and a member of our Board of Directors from October 2007 to December 2007, in exchange for 3.0 million shares of our common stock held by Mr. Zhou.  The 3.0 million shares of our common stock were recorded as treasury shares valued at cost as determined by a third party valuation.million.

OnIn connection with the INTAC Merger, on January 31 and February 1, 2008, also in connection with the INTAC Merger, certainadditional investors (referred to in this report as the European investors) purchased $5.8 million, before expenses, of our common stock and $11 million of our shares held as treasury stock, respectively, for a price per share of $3.68.  In this transaction, we issued approximately 1.6 million shares of our common stock and sold 3.0 million treasury shares in the aggregate to the European investors.respectively.

 
Our Relationship with Discovery Communications, Inc.
 
Following the grantHowStuffWorks' contribution of digital publishing rights from HowStuffWorks to us, HowStuffWorks merged with Discovery Communications, Inc. (“Discovery”) on December 17, 2007 (the “Discovery Merger”), and became a wholly owned subsidiary of Discovery.  The following summarizes the material agreements between the parties.HowStuffWorks and us:

·  We hold a perpetual, fully paid, royalty-free, sublicensable exclusive license to certain of the content published on HowStuffWorks.com in local languages and the HowStuffWorks brand for Brazil and China.
·  HowStuffWorks provides to us new and updated content published on HowStuffWorks.com, upon our request and pursuant to the same license terms.
·  We have the right to an exclusive license for the HowStuffWorks trademarks for our Brazil and China websites that display the HowStuffWorks content.
·  We hold a perpetual, fully paid up, royalty-free, sublicensable license to the software code for HowStuffWorks’ content management platform.
·  HowStuffWorks has the right to designate three members of our Board of Directors and the chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee.  Additionally, to the extent that HowStuffWorks owns any shares of our common stock in excess of 45% of the outstanding shares, HowStuffWorks is required to vote such excess shares in the exact proportion to the vote of our other shareholders.  HowStuffWorks may vote in its discretion its shares of our common stock up to and including 45% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of any applicable record date.

The merger agreement between Discovery and HowStuffWorks provided that payment to the former HowStuffWorks shareholders for a significant portion of its ownership of our common stock would not be paid at the October 2007 closing of the transaction, but instead willwould be available to be paid in three semi-annual installments.  The installments during a period which beganwere planned to begin in October 2008.2008; however, no payment has occurred as of December 31, 2009.  Such payments will be in the form of cash or shares of HSWI stock now held by HowStuffWorks.  Accordingly, the amount of shares of our common stock Discovery indirectly owned by Discoveryowns in the future may fall or rise due to a combination of the potential distributions pursuant to the terms of the Discovery merger or our exercise of the options to publish HowStuffWorks content in local languages in Russia and India.  All of our rights to publish HowStuffWorks content will remain effective regardless of the number of shares owned by HowStuffWorks in the future.Merger.  At December 31, 2008,2009, Discovery, through its wholly owned subsidiary HowStuffWorks, owned approximately 42.8%43% of our outstanding common stock, and had not made any share distributions of our common stock to former HowStuffWorks shareholders.stock. 

Sale of the INTAC Legacy Businesses and Related Transactions
 
Due to an increased focus of our management and resources on our primary Internet publishing business, a change of control in our majority ownership leading to further refinement in our strategies, and an under-performance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses after the INTAC Merger, in early 2008 we decided to dispose ofsell those businesses.  The INTAC Legacy Businesses were comprised of two lines of business unrelated to our core Internet platform businesses.

We decided that it was critical that all our current resources be fully focused on expanding our Brazilian Internet platform and the June 2008 launch of our Chinese Internet platform.  Although we believe we benefited in the short-term from INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses, this refined strategic focus did not allow us the time required to realize the expected long-term synergies, embodied in our acquired INTAC goodwill, from INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies.  In addition, we were provided with and acted on an opportunity to sell the INTAC Legacy Businesses for approximately their stand-alone appraised value, and through simultaneous sale of the treasury stock received, generate significant additional cash to invest into our core Internet businesses.
 
34


In February and March 2008, we sold the INTAC Legacy Businesses to an entity owned by Mr. Zhou.Wei Zhou, former CEO of INTAC and member of our board of directors for part of 2007.  We funded the businesses with $4.3 million of cash, net of disposition expenses, and received 5.0 million500,000 shares of our stock in exchange. As of December 31, 2008, all of HSWI’s assets were in our core Internet business and the sole assets we retained from the INTAC Merger were the Internet licenses intangible asset we used to enter the Chinese markets in June 2008.

On February 15, 2008, we entered into a stock purchase agreement where we agreed to sell, and two qualified institutional buyers agreed to purchase, the 5.0 million500,000 shares of our common stock received from the INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition at a purchase price of $3.68$36.80 per share.  We simultaneously sold 5.0 million500,000 shares to institutional buyers in a private placement raising $18.4 million additional cash.

Sales & Support
 
We have sales teamsoperations in Brazil and the United StatesChina to service advertisers and customers for our businesses.  We conduct sales for the websites in Brazil, China and the U.S. through a direct sales force, as well as strategic relationships with companies that can represent our advertising inventory.  We are implementing the same model in China.
 
Marketing
 
The primary business model for our websites is the sale ofto sell advertising, sponsorships and related products and services.  By focusing on providing high-quality web properties to end users in Brazil, China and the United States, we aim to establish a user base attractive to advertisers.  We primarily sell advertising based on the quantity of views delivered to advertisers or the success of various advertising-related metrics.
 
Much of our marketing effort is in fostering word-of-mouth momentum by providing high-quality products and services and using public relations efforts.  Additionally, we enter into relationships with existinglocal businesses to provide awareness of and traffic to our products and services.  We also engage in advertising designed to inform potential users and customers about our products and services.  We have not yet commenced any marketing for our web platform services.
 
Competition
 
The online publishing business is highly competitive.  We encounter significant competition in each market in which we offer our products and services.  Our competitors include (i) national Internet portals in China such as Baidu, NetEase.com, Shanda Interactive Entertainment, Sina, sohu.com and tom.com;tom.com, and (ii) national websites in Brazil such as Terra and UOL; and health social media websites like MedHelp.com and trusera.com,UOL, all of which compete with us for online advertising revenue and end users.

Our web platform services business provides services that relate to the design, development and operation of websites for Sharecare.  We currently have an exclusive services contract with Sharecare that expires in June 2010.  Although we believe this contract will likely be renewed, we may be subject to competition from other website service providers.  We are likely to be subject to competition from other website service providers in seeking to acquire other clients for this business.  Website service providers vary in their offerings and are highly competitive due to the nature of the industry.

Intellectual Property

We rely upon patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in various jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary assets and brand.  We do not own any patent or copyright registrations.  We hold various trademarks for our brands, and we have additional applications pending.
 
A number of threats exist to our intellectual property rights.  Effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we intend to distribute products and services.  Additionally, it may be time consuming and costly for us to protect our intellectual property, and even then such steps may not be sufficient or effective.


4



Government Regulation
 
Our operations in China and Brazil are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet.  Laws and regulations are being debated and considered for adoption in these countries and others throughout the world in areas relating to user privacy, freedom of expression, content, advertising, information security and intellectual property rights.
 
5

Additionally, the Internet infrastructures in China and Brazil are subject to regulatory control and, in the case of China, ownership by the Chinese government.  The People’s Republic of China, or PRC, regulates its Internet sector by enacting legislation or issuing regulations regarding the legality of foreign investment in the PRC Internet sector and the existence and enforcement of content restrictions on the Internet.  We believe that our current ownership structure and localized content complies with PRC laws and regulations.  There are, however, substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement of PRC Internet laws and regulations.  Accordingly, it is possible that the PRC government will ultimately take a view contrary to ours.
 
The PRC Ministry of Information Industry (“MII”), the Chinese governmental agency that regulates the Internet in China, has stated that the activities of Internet content providers are subject to regulation by various PRC government authorities, depending on the specific activities conducted by the Internet content provider.  Various government authorities have stated publicly that they are in the process of preparing new laws and regulations that will govern these activities.  The areas of regulation include, among others, online advertising, online news reporting, online publishing, online securities trading, online community, online video, and the provision of industry specificindustry-specific (e.g., pharmaceutical-related) information over the Internet.  Other aspects of our online operations may be subject to regulation in the future.
 
The MII also promulgated a directive, effective January 31, 2008, providing that online videos can only be broadcast or streamed by state-owned or controlled companies.  Subsequent interpretation was provided to exclude certain websites that existed prior to the directive.  This directive may prevent our Chinese website from displaying online videos, which could have a material effect on the business.
 
Because our services are accessible worldwide, certain foreign jurisdictions may claim that we are required to comply with their laws, even where we have no local entity, employees or infrastructure.  This could also be detrimental to our business.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had 7066 employees located inin: Atlanta, Georgia, USA; São Paulo, Brazil; and California, USA; Brazil andBeijing, China.
 
Seasonality

We expect our business to be affected by seasonal fluctuations in Internet usage and traditional retail seasonality.  Internet usage generally slows during the summer months, and online shopping and related advertising typically increases in the fourth quarter of each year.  These seasonal trends will likely cause fluctuations in quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequential revenue growth rates.
 
Available informationInformation
 
Our website address is www.hswinternational.com.www.hswinternational.com.  Information on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and should not be considered a part of this report.  We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

 
56

 

ITEM 1A.1A.  RISK FACTORS




·  successfully commercialize and monetize the contributed and acquired assets;
·  successfully attract advertisers for our websites and clients for our web platform services;
·  continue to raise additional working capital, the lack of which would likely have a significant negative impact on our long term business plan and our ability to take advantage of our strategic alliances and to successfully execute our expansion plan;
·  manage our expense structure as a U.S. public company including, without limitation, compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act;
·  manage the anticipated rise in operating expenses;
·  manage and implement successfully new business strategies including, if applicable, new strategies resulting from the Discovery Merger and the accompanying changes to the agreements between HowStuffWorks and us;strategies;
·  adapt and successfully execute our evolving and unpredictable business model, with which we will have only limited experience;
·  establish and take advantage of contacts and strategic relationships;
·  adapt to our potential diversification into other industries and geographic regions;
·  manage and adapt to rapidly changing and expanding operations;
·  implement and improve operational, financial and management systems and processes;
·  respond effectively to competitive developments;
·  attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; and
·  manage each of the other risks set forth in this report.

We may not have sufficient liquidity to support the time required for our business to fully develop.

The Company is in the process of launchingdeveloping Internet businesses, in three different markets, including publishing businesses in two emerging markets.markets and a web services business.  We currently operate at a loss and with a substantial negative cash flow from operations.  While we believe that our cash resources on hand are sufficient to fund these businesses for less than 24a period of at least 12 months, our cash resources are not sufficient to fund these businesses for an extended period beyond that unless revenues increase significantly or we find other sources of capital, neither of which can be assured.  Our management and directors continually evaluate our progress and likelihood of success in each of our markets, and our ability to raise additional capital, against the relative value of our resources and other opportunities.  Accordingly, we might decide to suspend our activities in one or more of our markets in order to focus our limited resources in the other(s). 
We may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our business or to exploit opportunities.


We may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.  If required, we may attempt to raise such additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements.  There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
6



We may not succeed in marketing and monetizing our assets to potential customers or developing strategic partnerships for the distribution of our products and services.

Our plans to market and monetize our assets in the Chinese and Brazilian online markets through the Internet are new and unproven.  Moreover, we will have limited experience in determining the pricing of the products and services that we plan to develop.  Because we have never marketed or sold these products and services, we may not be successful in establishing a customer base or strategic
7

partnerships for the distribution of our products and services.  If we are not successful in developing, releasing and marketing these products and services on a profitable basis, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
 
We do not have significant experience in the Brazilian and Chinese marketplaces.  Additionally, we may not have the resources available to simultaneously develop operations in China and Brazil.  Accordingly, there may be a delay in developing such operations or we might decide not to pursue these markets, which could affect our business plan and results of operations.

In addition, any delay in developing our operations in Brazil and China may impact our decision to exercise our option to acquire the exclusive digital publishing rights for the content in India and Russia.  The option expires in May 2009 and our failure to exercise such option may have an adverse affect on our ability to expand our international operations, which could affect our business plan and results of operations.  Exercise of this option requires our issuing additional shares to HowStuffWorks and we will consider the cost of the option and the opportunities of the specific market when considering whether or not to exercise each option. At this time we have made no determination concerning whether these options will be exercised.

The growth we seek is rare.difficult to achieve and will place significant strain on our resources.

Substantial future growth will be required in order for us to realize our business objectives.  Growth of this magnitude is rare.  To the extent we are capable of growing our business as necessary, we expect that such growth will place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources.  We must manage our growth, if any, through appropriate systems and controls in each of these areas.  We must also establish, train and manage a larger work force.  If we do not manage the growth of our business effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We face intense competition, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The online publishing market isand web platform services markets are highly competitive.  We encounter significant competition across our business lines and in each market in which we offer our products and services.  In the online publishing market, we expect that our competitors will include (i) national Internet portals in China such as Baidu, NetEase.com, Shanda Interactive Entertainment, Sina, sohu.com and tom.com;tom.com, and (ii) national websites in Brazil such as Terra and UOL; and health information websites in the U.S. like MedHelp.com and trusera.com,UOL, all of which will compete with us for online advertising revenue and end users.  Many of our competitors have more experience, resources and website visitors than us.  In the web platform services market, many of our competitors have been providing similar services for an extended period of time, and have developed established brands, reputations, offerings, and client bases.  Many of our web platform services competitors have more experience and resources than we do.

The sale of INTAC’s Legacy Businesses, leaving our strategic focus on the online publishing, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

INTAC’s wireless handset distribution business accounted for approximately 95% of its total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, and approximately 92% of its total revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.  We sold the INTAC Legacy Businesses in February 2008 which eliminates future revenues from the INTAC Merger.  All future revenue will be derived from online publishing market and other future business strategies.  There is no guarantee that we will be able to offset the sale of the wireless handset distribution business and the INTAC Legacy Businesses through comparable growth in our online publishing businesses.
Resales of our common stock and additional obligations to issue our common stock may cause the market price of our stock to fall.
 
We have registered for resale an aggregate of 33,634,1923,363,419 shares of our common stock held by INTAC affiliates, HowStuffWorks and investors that participated in our equity financings, although HowStuffWorks agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer one-third of its shares until October 2008, one-third of its shares until April 2009 and one-third of its shares until October 2009.those investors could resell that stock.  In addition, we granted HowStuffWorks holds a warrant to purchase 500,000 (250,000 of which are now expired)25,000 shares of our common stock.  The issuance of these new shares and the resale of additional shares of our common stock could depress the market price for our common stock.

7

Various factors could negatively affect the market price or market for our common stockstock.
 
The market for and price of our common stock could be affected by the following factors:
 
·  general market and economic conditions;
·  our common stock has been thinly traded; and 
·  minimal third party research is available regarding our company.

Additionally, the terms of the Discovery mergerMerger provided that payment to HowStuffWorks shareholders for a significant portion of HowStuffWorks’ ownership of our common stock would not be paid at the October 2007 closing of the transaction and instead will be paidare  payable to HowStuffWorks’ former shareholders in three semi-annual installments.  The installments beginning on or aboutwere planned to begin in October 2008.2008; however, the shareholder representative has not authorized payment as of December 31, 2009.  Such payments will be in the form of cash or shares of HSWI stock now held by HowStuffWorks.  Accordingly, the amount of shares of our common stock indirectly owned by Discovery owns in the future may fall or rise due to a combination of the potential distributions pursuant to the terms of the Discovery merger or our exercise of the options to publish HowStuffWorks content in local languages in Russia and India.reasons.  All of our rights to publish HowStuffWorks content will remain effective regardless of the number of shares owned by HowStuffWorks owns in the future.  If Discovery and HowStuffWorks’ former shareholders’ representative elect to distribute shares of our common stock to former HowStuffWorks shareholders, a significant number of shares may be sold by such shareholders relative to the daily market trading volumes for our common stock.  While we intend to take reasonable measures aimed to ensure that any such potential sales are not disruptive to the market for our common stock, we cannot be certain as to the outcome.

These factors may similarlycould also affect our common stock, and may have the effect of depressingdepress the market price for our common stock or limitinglimit the market for resale of our common stock.
8


We might not be able to remain listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market.

In September 2009, we received a notice from The NASDAQ Stock Market indicating that we no longer complied with the continued listing requirement that our shares of common stock maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00.  In response, we conducted the Reverse Split and regained compliance with continued listing standards.  However, our common stock might not remain equal to or in excess of the $1.00 minimum closing bid for a substantial period of time.  The market price of our common stock is also based on other factors outside of our control.

In March 2010, the Company received a notice from The NASDAQ Stock Market indicating that it no longer complies with the requirements of NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5450(b)(1)(C) for continued listing on The NASDAQ Global Market.  The rule requires that the publicly held shares of the Company, which is calculated by subtracting all shares held by officers, directors or beneficial owners of 10% or more of the total shares outstanding, maintain a minimum market value of $5,000,000.  The Company has 180 calendar days, or until September 27, 2010, in which to regain compliance with the listing requirement by having the market value of its publicly held shares close at $5,000,000 or more for ten consecutive business days.  If the Company does not regain compliance prior to the expiration of the 180-day grace period, NASDAQ will provide written notice that the Company’s common stock is subject to delisting.  Alternatively, the Company may transfer its listing to The NASDAQ Capital Market, provided that it satisfies the requirements for continued listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.
If the bid price for our shares of common stock falls below $1.00 again, if the market value of our publicly held shares remains below $5,000,000, or if we do not meet other continued listing requirements of NASDAQ, our common stock may be delisted.

Our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent all possible errors that could occur.  Internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objective will be met.

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be satisfied.  Internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are designed to give a reasonable assurance that they are effective to achieve their objectives.  We cannot provide absolute assurance that all of our possible future control issues will be detected.  These inherent limitations include the possibility that judgments in our decision making can be faulty, and that isolated breakdowns can occur because of simple human error or mistake.  The design of our system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed absolutely in achieving our stated goals under all potential future or unforeseeable conditions.  Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error could occur and not be detected.

We may have additional tax liabilities if tax positions we have taken in prior years are challenged.

We and our subsidiaries are subject to taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions.  We believed that our tax returns appropriately reflected our tax liability when those tax returns were filed.  However, applicable tax authorities may challenge our tax positions may be challenged by the applicable tax authorities.positions.  Any successful challenge to one or more of our prior tax positions could result in a material tax liability to us or to one or more of our subsidiaries, including INTAC, for one or more prior years.


8



The state of the Internet infrastructure in China and Brazil may limit our growth.

We rely on the Internet for certain aspects of our business, including the publication of content online and our Internet portals.  The Internet infrastructures in China and Brazil are not well developed and are subject to regulatory control and, in the case of China, ownership by the Chinese government.  The cost of Internet access is high relative to the average income in China.  Failure to further develop these infrastructures could limit our ability to grow.  Alternatively, as these infrastructures improve and Internet use increases, we may not be able to scale our systems proportionately.  Our reliance on these infrastructures will make us vulnerable to disruptions or failures in service, without sufficient access to alternative networks and services.  Such disruptions or failures could reduce our user satisfaction.  Should these risks be realized, our ability to increase revenues and profitability would be impaired.

Our operations are vulnerable to natural disasters and other events.

While we believe we have adequate backup systems in place, we could still experience system failures and electrical outages from time to time in the future, which could disrupt our operations.  All of our servers and routers are currently hosted in a single location, a Tier 4 data center.  We do not have a documented disaster recovery plan in the event of damage from fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes,flood, typhoon,
9

earthquake, power loss, and telecommunications failures,failure, break ins andin or similar events.  If any of the foregoing occurs, we may experience a temporary system shutdown.  If there is significant disruption or damage to the data center hosting our web servers, our ability to provide access to our websites would be interrupted.  We do not carry any business interruption insurance.  Although we carry property insurance, our coverage may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses, particularly with respect to loss of business and reputation that may occur.

Our network operations may be vulnerable to hacking, viruses and other disruptions, which may make our products and services less attractive and reliable.

Internet usage of our products could decline if any well publicized compromise of our security occurs.  “Hacking” involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems or to cause intentional malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment.  Hackers, if successful, could misappropriate proprietary information or cause disruptions in our service.  We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect our website against hackers.  We cannot assure you that any measures we may take will be effective.  In addition, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could expose us to a material risk of loss or litigation and possible liability, as well as materially damage our reputation and decrease our user traffic.

Unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties, and the expenses incurred in protecting our intellectual property rights, may adversely affect our business.

We regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual property as critical to our success.  Unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties may adversely affect our business and reputation.  We rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements with our employees, customers, business partners and others to protect our intellectual property rights.  Despite our precautions, it is possible for third parties to obtain and use our intellectual property without authorization.  Furthermore, the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property in Internet related industries are uncertain and still evolving.  In particular, the laws of the PRC, Brazil and certain other countries are uncertain or do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.  Moreover, litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others.  Future litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources.

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which may force us to incur substantial legal expenses and, if determined adversely against us, materially disrupt our business.

We cannot be certain that our products and services will not infringe valid patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights held by third parties.  We may in the future be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of our business.  In particular, if we are found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be enjoined from using such intellectual property, and may incur licensing fees or be forced to develop alternatives.  We may incur substantial expenses in defending against these third party infringement claims, regardless of their merit.  Successful infringement claims against us may result in substantial monetary liability or may materially disrupt the conduct of our business.


9



Our sublicensed content is subject to the terms and conditions of agreements between HowStuffWorks and third parties.

Under the terms of our contribution agreements, HowStuffWorks transferred and contributed to us all rights, but only those rights, whichthat belong to and are held by HowStuffWorks pursuant to third-party licenses.  Some of those licenses, including those with Publications International, Inc., contain restrictions on the use of such content and termination provisions for breaches of the license agreements.  Accordingly, a breach of any third party license by HowStuffWorks may cause us to lose our license with such third party, which could have a material adverse effect on the implementation of our business plan, value of our content offering and results of our operations.

A slowdown or other adverse developments in the PRC or Brazil economy may materially and adversely affect our customers, demand for our services and our business.

Although the PRC economy has grown significantly in recent years, we cannot assure you that such growth will continue and weWe may be sensitive to a slowdown in economic growth or other adverse changes in the PRC and Brazil economies.  This is particularly true in light of current financial and economic uncertainties.  In response to adverse economic developments, companies may reducehave reduced spending on marketing and advertising.  As a result, a slowdown in overall economic growth, an economic downturn or
10

recession or other adverse economic developments in China or Brazil may materially reduce the demand for our services and materially and adversely affect our business.

PRC laws and regulations related to the PRC Internet sector are unclear and will likely change in the near future.  If we are found to be in violation of current or future PRC laws or regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties.

The PRC regulates its Internet sector by making pronouncements or enacting regulations regarding the legality of foreign investment in the PRC Internet sector and the existence and enforcement of content restrictions on the Internet.  There are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation of current PRC Internet laws and regulations, including those discussed below.

The PRC enacted regulations applying to Internet related services and telecommunications related activities.  While many aspects of these regulations remain unclear, they purport to limit and require licensing of various aspects of the provision of Internet information services.  The Ministry of Information Industry, or MII, has also stated that the activities of Internet content providers are subject to regulation by various PRC government authorities, depending on the specific activities conducted by the Internet content provider.  Various government authorities have stated publicly that they are in the process of preparing new laws and regulations that will govern these activities.  The areas of regulation currently include online advertising, online news reporting, online publishing, online securities trading and the provision of industry specific (e.g., drug related) information over the Internet.  Other aspects of our online operations may be subject to regulation in the future.


The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws and regulations, the directives of the MII and the possible new laws or regulations have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, PRC Internet companies, including us.  Accordingly, it is possible that the relevant PRC authorities could, at any time, assert that any portion or all of our ownership structure and business violate existing or future PRC laws, regulations or policies.  It is also possible that the new laws or regulations governing the PRC Internet sector that have been adopted or may be adopted in the future will prohibit or restrict foreign investment in, or other aspects of, any of our proposed businesses and operations.  In addition, these new laws and regulations may be retroactively applied to us.


10



If we are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, the relevant PRC authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violation, including, without limitation, the following:

·  levying fines;
·  confiscating our income;
·  revoking our business licenses;
·  
pursuing criminal sanctions against our business and personnel;
·  shutting down our servers and/or blocking our websites;
·  requiring us to restructure our ownership structure or operations; and
·  requiring us to discontinue any portion or all of our Internet business.
Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A 2006 regulation establishes more complex procedures in the PRC for acquisitions conducted by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions.

In August 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies - the PRC Ministry of Commerce, or the MOC, the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Chinese State Administration for Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, jointly adopted the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, which became effective in September 2006.  Among other things, the new regulations established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requiring in some instances that the MOC be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise.  We may grow
11

our business in part by directly acquiring complementary businesses in China.  Complying with the requirements of the new regulations could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOC, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

We face risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, particularly in the PRC.

Our business could be adversely affected by outbreaks of avian influenza, SARS or other widespread diseases.  Many users of our Websites, especially in China, access the Internet at public cafes.  Any prolonged recurrence of avian influenza, SARS or other widespread disease in China could prompt the government to restrict people’s movements, limit gathering in public places, or otherwise prevent our users from accessing Internet cafes.  If our users cannot access Internet cafes, or we are unable to staff our office in China, our business operations could be materially affected.  We have not adopted any written preventive measures or contingency plans to combat any future outbreak of avian influenza, SARS or any other epidemic.

We may incur substantial administrative and staffing cost due to the PRC’s new labor contract law.

In 2007 the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China enacted the Labor Contract Law, which became effective in January 2008.  The Labor Contract Law’s goal is to improve job security and to protect the rights and interests of employees.  In order to fully comply with the legal requirements under the Labor Contract Law, we may incur substantial administrative and staffing cost, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

The online advertising markets in China and Brazil are still developing, and present risk to our revenues to be generated from our online publishing business using the contributed assets.

OurWe expect our online publishing businesses in China and Brazil are expected to derive significant revenue from online advertisements.  The online advertising markets in China and Brazil are still developing, and future growth and expansion of these markets is uncertain.  If these online advertising markets do not grow at expected rates, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

Our international operations subject us to other significant risks including unpredictable governmental regulation in China and Brazil.

Our international operations expose us to a wide variety of other risks including increased credit risks, customs duties, import quotas and other trade restrictions, potentially greater inflationary pressures, and the risk of failure or material interruption of wireless systems and services.  Changes may occur in foreign trade and investment laws in the territories and countries where we will operate.  U.S. laws and regulations relating to investment and trade in foreign countries could also change to our detriment.  Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profits.  We are subject to risk of political instability and trade sanctions within China.

China has traditionally been a closed market with strict political controls.  As China shifts to a market economy, growing economic and social freedoms may conflict with the more restrictive political and governmental policies.  In addition, democratic countries throughout the world have, from time to time, attempted to use economic and other sanctions to achieve political or social change in other countries.  Each of these factors could result in economic sanctions, economic instability, the disruption of trading and war within China and the Asia Pacific Rim, any of which could result in our inability to conduct business operations in China.  Because we expect a substantial amount of our business is expected to be within China in the long term, the disruption of distribution channels into China would have material and adverse consequences to our business.

In the past, the Brazilian government has intervened in the Brazilian economy and occasionally made drastic changes in economic policy.  The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and affect other policies have included high interest rates, wage and price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on exports, among other actions.  Our business, financial condition, revenues, results of operations, prospects and the market price of our securities may be adversely affected by changes in Brazilian government policies, as well as general economic factors, including:

·  currency fluctuations;
·  exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad, such as those that were briefly imposed on such remittances (including dividends) in 1989 and in the beginning of 1990;
12

·  inflation;
·  price instability;
·  energy policy;
·  interest rate increases;
·  liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;
·  changes in tax policy; and
·  other political, domestic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
11


Also, the President of Brazil has considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions that relate to the Brazilian economy and, consequently, affect the operations and financial performance of businesses operating in Brazil.  We have no control over, and cannot predict what policies or actions the Brazilian government may take in the future.

Further risks relating to international operations include, but are not restricted to, unexpected changes in legal and regulatory requirements, changes in tariffs, exchange rates and other barriers, political and economic instability, possible effects of war and acts of terrorism, difficulties in accountaccounts receivable collection,collections, difficulties in managing distributors or representatives, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, difficulties in protecting our intellectual property overseas, seasonality of sales and potentially adverse tax consequences.  Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profits.

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively.
 
Some of our operating expenses are denominated in Chinese Renminbi.Renminbi.  Currently, we may purchase foreign exchange for settlement of “current account transactions” without the approval of the Chinese State Administration for Foreign Exchange, or SAFE.  We may also retain foreign exchange in our current account (subject to a ceiling approved by the SAFE) to satisfy foreign exchange liabilities or to pay dividends.  However, the relevant PRC governmental authorities may limit or eliminate our ability to purchase and retain foreign currencies in the future.

Additionally, some of our revenues and operating expenses are denominated in Brazilian Reais.  Brazilian law allows the Brazilian government to impose restrictions on the conversion of the Real into foreign currencies and on the remittance to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil.  The government may impose such restrictions whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are reasons to foresee a serious imbalance.  The Brazilian government last imposed remittance restrictions for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990.  The likelihood that the Brazilian government would impose such restrictions again may dependdepends on the extent of Brazil’s foreign currency reserves, the availability of foreign currency in the foreign exchange markets on the date a payment is due, the size of Brazil’s debt service burden relative to the economy as a whole, Brazil’s policy toward the International Monetary Fund and other factors.

Since a significant amount of our revenues will be denominated in Renminbi, existing and future restrictions on the exchange of Renminbi to other currencies may limit our ability to use revenue generated in Renminbi to fund our business activities outside China, if any, or expenditures denominated in foreign currencies.  Similarly, in the event that a significant amount of our revenues are denominated in Reais, any future restrictions on the exchange of Reais for other currencies or the remittance to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil may limit our ability to use revenue generated in Reais to fund our business activities outside Brazil, or expenditures denominated in foreign currencies.

We are subject to risks of currency fluctuations and exchange restrictions.

Currency fluctuations, devaluations and exchange restrictions may adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.  In some countries, local currencies mayare not be readily converted into Euros or U.S. dollars (or other “hard currencies”) or mayare only be converted at government controlled rates, and, in some countries, the transfer of hard currencies offshore has been restricted from time to time.  Very limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.  To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.  While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure, if at all.  Our revenues as expressed in our U.S. dollar financial statements will decline in value if Renminbi or Reais depreciate relative to the U.S. dollar.  In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into U.S. dollars or by Brazilian exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Reais into U.S. dollars.


 
1213

 


Regulation and censorship of information collection and distribution in China may adversely affect our business.

China has enacted regulations governing Internet access and the distribution of news and other information.  Furthermore, the Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party has been given the responsibility to censor news published in China to ensure, supervise and control a particular political ideology.  In addition, the MII has published implementing regulations that subject online information providers to potential liability for content included on their portals and the actions of subscribers and others using their systems, including liability for violation of PRC laws prohibiting the distribution of content deemed to be socially destabilizing.  Because many PRC laws, regulations and legal requirements with regard to the Internet are relatively new and untested, their interpretation and enforcement may involve significant uncertainty.  In addition, the PRC legal system is a civil law system in which decided legal cases have limited binding force as legal precedents.  As a result, in many cases it is difficult to determine the type of content that maywill result in liability for a website operator.

Periodically, the Ministry of Public Security has stopped the distribution over the Internet of information which it believes to be socially destabilizing.  The Ministry of Public Security has the authority to cause any local Internet service provider to block any website maintained outside China at its sole discretion.  If the PRC government were to take action to limit or eliminate the distribution of information through our portals or to limit or regulate current or future applications available to users of our portals, our business would be adversely affected.

The State Secrecy Bureau, which is directly responsible for the protection of state secrets of all PRC government and Chinese Communist Party organizations, is authorized to block any website it deems to be leaking state secrets or failing to meet the relevant regulations relating to the protection of state secrets in the distribution of online information.  Under the applicable regulations, we maycould be held liable for any content transmitted on our portal.  Furthermore, where the transmitted content clearly violates the laws of the PRC, we will be required to delete it, and where the transmitted content is considered suspicious, we are required to report such content.  We must also undergo computer security inspections, and if we fail to implement the relevant safeguards against security breaches, our operations in the PRC maycould be shut down.

Although the PRC has several laws and regulations relating to the use of the Internet, addressing personal privacy in use of the Internet and the freedom of communications, the PRC government does not restrict online service providers in the collection, transmission and commercial use of personal information or data.  Personal data is protected from unlawful use by general statutes and by any contractual arrangement between the user and the service provider.


Potential additional Chinese regulation could affect our business in China.

The Ministry of Information Industry, the Chinese governmental agency whichthat regulates the Internet in China, promulgated a directive effective January 31, 2008, providing that online videos can only be broadcast or streamed by state-owned or controlled companies.  Subsequently, the Ministry of Information Industry acted to provide exceptions for certain non-state-owned or controlled companies.  While it is possible that our Chinese website would not be permitted to display online videos, which could have a material effect on the content provided on such website, it is not yet clear what, if any, effect this regulation has upon our business in China.


13



Political and economic policies of the PRC government could affect our business.

A significant portion of our business, assets and operations are located in China and a significant portion of our future revenues are expected to be derived from our operations in China.  Accordingly, our business could be adversely affected by changes in political, economic or social conditions in China, adjustments in PRC government policies or changes in laws and regulations.

The economy of China differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in a number of respects, including:

·  structure;
14

·  level of government involvement;
·  level of development;
·  level of capital reinvestment;
·  growth rate;
·  control of foreign exchange; and
·  methods of allocating resources.

Since 1949, China has been primarily a planned economy subject to a system of macroeconomic management.  Although the Chinese government still owns a significant portion of the productive assets in China, economic reform policies since the late 1970s have emphasized decentralization, autonomous enterprises and the utilization of market mechanisms.  We cannot predict what effects the economic reform and macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese government may have on our business or results of operations.

The PRC legal system embodies uncertainties which could limit the legal protections available to us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes.  Unlike common law systems, it is a system in which decided legal cases have little precedential value.  In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general.  We are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in mainland China.  However, these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively recent, and their interpretation and enforcement involve uncertainties.  These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to us and other foreign investors.  In addition, we cannot predict the effect of future developments in the PRC legal system, particularly with regard to the Internet, our ownership structure and currency exchange, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, or the preemption of local regulations by national laws.

It may be difficult to enforce any civil judgments against us or our board of directors or officers, because in the future a significant portion of our assets could be located outside of the United States.

Although the combined company is incorporated in the State of Delaware, in the future a substantial portion of our assets could be located in Brazil and the PRC.  As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce outside the United States any actions brought against us in the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or of the securities laws of any state of the United States.  In addition, certain of our directors and officers and all or a substantial portion of their assets may be located outside the United States (principally in Brazil and the PRC).  As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon those directors and officers, or to enforce against them or us judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or of the securities laws of any state of the United States.  There is doubt as to the enforceability in Brazil and the PRC, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of civil liabilities predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States or the securities laws of any state of the United States.


14



If we are not able to attract and retain key management and consultants, we may not successfully integrate the contributed assets into our historical business or achieve our other business objectives.

We will depend upon our senior management and consultants for our business success.  Key members of the senior team include Jeff Arnold, a consultant and our current Chairman of the Board.  Our consulting agreement with Mr. Arnold, which commenced in 2006, runs through May 31, 2009.  The loss of the service of any of the key members of our senior management may significantly delay or prevent the integration of the contributed assets and other business objectives.  Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, consultants and advisors will be critical to our success.  We may not be unableable to attract and retain these individuals, and our failure to do so would adversely affect our business.

The concentration of our stock ownership will likely limit your ability to influence corporate matters.
 
HowStuffWorks, a subsidiary of Discovery, beneficially owns a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock and entered into a stockholders agreement.  The stockholders agreement entitles HowStuffWorks to designate nominees to our boardBoard of directors.Directors.  Furthermore, Jeff Arnold, our current Chairmana member of the Board, is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of HowStuffWorks,Global Digital Strategy for Discovery, and another member of our Boardboard, Michael Cascone, is Chief Operating Officer of Directors is President-DigitalDiscovery’s Digital Media and Business Development of its parent company, Discovery.business unit which includes HowStuffWorks.  As a result, HowStuffWorksDiscovery has the ability to influence our management and affairs and determine the outcome of matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors, amendments to the charter, approval of equity-based employee compensation plans and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.  The
15

interests of Discovery and its affiliates may materially conflict with the interests of other shareholders.  For as long as they exert a controlling influence over our business affairs, they will have the ability to cause us to take actions that may be adverse to the interests of other shareholders or inconsistent with other shareholders’ investment objectives.

The concentration of our stock ownership, as well as our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Amended and Restated Bylaws, stockholders agreement and Delaware law contain provisions that may make our acquisition more difficult without the approval of our board of directors, which could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving our change of control.

As of March 30,December 31, 2009, HowStuffWorksDiscovery owned approximately 43% of our outstanding shares of common stock.stock through its HowStuffWorks subsidiary.  As a result, it will be difficult for our other stockholders to approve a takeover of us without the cooperation of HowStuffWorks.Discovery.

Furthermore, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain certain anti-takeover provisions, including but not limited to the following provisions:

·  only our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may call special meetings of our stockholders;
·  our stockholders may take action only at a meeting of our stockholders and not by written consent;
·  
·  SEC Rule 14a-8 requires that we receive notice of stockholder proposals at least 120 days prior to the date of our proxy statement for the previous year’s annual meeting or we do not have to include them in our proxy materials; and
·  for stockholder proposals not requested to be included in our proxy materials under Rule 14a-8, we require advance notice for stockholder proposals of not less than 60 nor more than 90 days prior to a meeting at which stockholder proposals mayfor the proposal to be introduced.introduced and considered.

In addition, the stockholders agreement gives HowStuffWorks the right to designate nominees to our boardBoard of directors.Directors.

These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change of control of us.  These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to cause us to take other corporate actions you may desire.

Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may also delay, defer or prevent a change in control that our stockholders might consider to be in their best interest.  We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits “business combinations” between a publicly-held Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder,” which is generally defined as a stockholder who becomes a beneficial owner of 15% or more of a Delaware corporation’s voting stock for a three-year period following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder.  Section 203 could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us that our stockholders might consider to be in their best interest.


15



Acquisitions, business combinations and other transactions present integration risk and may have negative consequences for our business and our stockholders.
 
The process of integrating acquired businesses like DailyStrength, into our existing operations may result in unforeseen difficulties and liabilities and may require a disproportionate amount of resources and management attention.  Difficulties that we may encounter in integrating the operations of acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.  Moreover, we may not realize any of the anticipated benefits of an acquisition and integration costs may exceed anticipated amounts.  We may enter into joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar arrangements with third parties.  These transactions may result in changes in the nature and scope of our operations and changes in our financial condition.  Financing for these transactions may come from cash on hand, proceeds from the issuance of additional common stock or proceeds from debt financing.

The issuance of additional equity or debt securities could:

·  cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders at the time of the issuance;
·  cause substantial dilution of our earnings per share;
·  subject us to the risks associated with increased leverage;
·  subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
·  adversely affect the prevailing market price for our outstanding securities.
 
We may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our business or to exploit opportunities.

16

We may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.  If required, we may attempt to raise such additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements.  There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.

We face competition from other social media companies.

We face competition for our DailyStrength website from other social media companies, including start-ups as well as developed companies that are enhancing or developing social media technologies.  Also, we may compete with companies that provide health-focused websites because these companies, like us, are trying to sell advertising for health content on the Internet.  Among the social media and health-focused website companies, there are a number of large, established competitors with significantly greater employees and cash resources than we have.  We expect that some of these companies will increasingly use their resources to compete against us in a variety of ways, including by making acquisitions, investing more aggressively in research and development, and competing more aggressively for advertisers and users.  If our competitors are successful in providing similar or better social media destinations for health, we could experience a decline in user traffic.  Any such decline could negatively affect our revenues and growth opportunities.

We may not be able to successfully grow and monetize our social media business.

Formidable growth of users and revenue is required for our DailyStrength social media business to generate sufficient revenue to cover operating costs.  If we fail to maintain and enhance the “DailyStrength” brand, if we are unable to attract sufficient users for our DailyStrength website, or if we incur excessive expenses in these efforts, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.

We generate revenue on our revenue almost entirelyinternational sites from advertising, and the reduction in spending by or loss of advertisers could seriously harm our business.

We generated the majority of our revenues in 2008 and 2009 from our advertisers.  The global financial crisis continues to have a negative effect on the demand for advertising in general, including online advertising.  Economic uncertainty has had and might continue to have a direct impact on our revenue as orders for online advertising have declined and our typical advertiser is spending less per order than in the prior year.  We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of the current economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery generally or in the online advertising market.  If the economy or markets in which we operate continue to worsen, our business, financial condition and results of operations will likely be materially and adversely affected.  Our advertisers can generally terminate their contracts with us at any time.  Advertisers will not continue to do business with us if their investment in advertising with us does not generate sales leads, and ultimately customers, or if we do not deliver their advertisements in an appropriate and effective manner.  If we are unable to be competitive and provide value to our advertisers, they may stop placing ads with us, which would negatively harm our revenues and business.  In addition, expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns.  Any decreases in or delays in advertising spending due to general economic conditions could reduce our revenues or negatively impact our ability to grow our revenues.

Our investment in Sharecare’s equity securities involves a substantial degree of risk.

Our investment in Sharecare’s equity securities is illiquid and might fail to appreciate and might decline in value or become worthless.  Our Sharecare equity securities likely will not pay current dividends, and our ability to realize a return on our investment, as well as to recover our investment, will be dependent on the success of Sharecare.  Sharecare is a recently-formed company with no history of operations.  Its prospects must be considered in light of the many risks, uncertainties, expenses, delays and difficulties encountered by companies in their early stages of development.  Moreover, Sharecare operates in the highly competitive internet industry and might not achieve profitability or consumer acceptance in the near-term, if ever.

Even if Sharecare is successful, our ability to realize the value of our investment might be limited.  Because it is a private company, there is no public market for Sharecare’s securities, and the Sharecare securities are subject to restrictions on resale that might prevent us from selling these securities during periods in which it would be advantageous to do so.  As a result, we might have to wait for a liquidity event, such as a public offering or the sale of Sharecare, to realize the value of our investment, if any.  It is likely to take a significant amount of time before a liquidity event occurs.

Sharecare may need to raise additional capital, and our equity position in Sharecare may be diluted if Sharecare issues additional equity, options, or warrants.  If Sharecare makes a capital call of its existing equity holders, our position may be diluted if we choose not to contribute additional capital.

Two of our stockholders also have substantial Sharecare investments, and potential conflicts of interests could harm us.

Jeff Arnold, a member of the Board of Directors, and Chief of Global Digital Strategy for Discovery, the parent company of HowStuffWorks, together with Discovery beneficially own over 40% of our common stock.  Both Mr. Arnold and Discovery own significant interests in Sharecare and serve on the board of directors of Sharecare, and Mr. Arnold is also Chairman and Chief Architect of Sharecare.  As a result, Mr. Arnold and Discovery have the ability to significantly influence and manage the affairs of both HSWI and Sharecare and determine the outcome of matters submitted for approval to stockholders of each company.  If HSWI and Sharecare’s interests diverge, there is a risk that Mr. Arnold or Discovery will favor actions by Sharecare that are adverse to HSWI.  Additionally, as a member of our board of directors, Mr. Arnold’s ownership interest in Sharecare will disqualify him from some
 
1617

 
deliberations of our board.  Michael Cascone, a member of our board of directors, is Chief Operating Officer of Discovery’s Digital Media business unit.  As a member of our board, Mr. Cascone’s position with Discovery will disqualify him from some deliberations of our board.  If HSWI and Sharecare’s interests diverge, there is a risk that Mr. Cascone will favor actions by Sharecare that are adverse to HSWI.

Our new web platform services line of business may not prove to be profitable.

We recently began a new line of business to offer web platform services to other companies.  We currently have one customer for these services, Sharecare, and our agreement with Sharecare expires in June 2010.  Although we believe Sharecare will renew the agreement, Sharecare may decide not to do so or we may be unable to reach agreement on terms for renewal.  We intend to offer web platform services to other customers, but we have limited sales, marketing and other resources and may not be successful in obtaining those customers.  Because Sharecare is a related party, the pricing and other terms included in the current agreement may not be indicative of the terms we can successfully obtain in arms-length transactions with other customers.  We have limited experience in this line of business, and will be subject to competition with companies with greater resources and experience.  Due to these factors, we may be unable to achieve profitability in this new line of business.

Our services agreement with Sharecare will soon expire, and we might not be able to negotiate a new agreement on as favorable terms, if at all.

We currently provide web development, design and management services to Sharecare under a services agreement.  This agreement will expire in June 2010 unless the Company and Sharecare agree to extend the term or enter into a new services agreement.  If neither occurs, Sharecare may extend the term for up to six months to transition the services performed by the Company for Sharecare to a new service provider.  We are in the process of negotiating a new services agreement with Sharecare but might not be able to reach an agreement on as favorable terms as the existing services agreement, if at all.  If we are unable to reach an agreement, we will lose a significant portion of our revenue.


ITEM 1B.1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS




No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2008.



 
1718

 

PART II
 
Our common stock has been traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HSWI” since October 2, 2007, and INTAC traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “INTN” prior to that time.2007.  The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our and INTAC’s common stock, as reported per the appropriateNASDAQ Global market.  Stock prices, as presented below, have been retroactively restated to reflect HSWI’s February 2010 10-for-1 reverse stock split.  See Note 11, “Stockholders Equity” of the financial statements.

 High  Low 
Year ended December 31, 2007      
First Quarter $8.92  $5.65 
Second Quarter 8.00  6.50 
Third Quarter 11.48  5.00 
Fourth Quarter 11.25  4.18 
       High  Low 
Year ended December 31, 2008             
First Quarter $6.23  $3.20  $62.30  $32.00 
Second Quarter 5.30  2.61   53.00   26.10 
Third Quarter 3.90  2.05   39.00   20.50 
Fourth Quarter 2.74  0.15   27.40   1.50 
        
Year ended December 31, 2009        
First Quarter $4.70  $0.80 
Second Quarter  4.70   1.50 
Third Quarter  6.80   1.90 
Fourth Quarter  5.10   2.70 



Holders of Record

As of March 30, 2009,31, 2010, the last sale price of our common stock on NASDAQ Global Market was $0.15$1.54 per share.  As of March 30, 2009,31, 2010, there were approximately 25 stockholders of record.

Dividend Policy

We have neither paid nor declared dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.  Any earnings that we may realize will be returned to finance our growth.


 
1819

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA





 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
            
Operating revenue $457,006  $147,535  $2,259,816  $457,006 
Cost of services  987,266   1,242,252   2,869,509   987,266 
Gross loss (530,260) (1,094,717)  (609,693)  (530,260)
Operating expenses  23,751,913   13,768,471   11,351,787   23,751,913 
Loss from operations (24,282,173) (14,863,188)  (11,961,480)  (24,282,173)
Other income 515,238  11,842 
Other income (loss)  209,661   515,238 
Deferred income tax benefit  1,962,500      688,630   1,962,500 
Loss in equity investment, net of tax  (818,087)   
Loss from continuing operations (21,804,435) (14,851,346)  (11,881,276)  (21,804,435)
Loss from discontinued operations  (133,526)  (24,687,959)     (133,526)
Net loss $(21,937,961) $(39,539,305) $(11,881,276) $(21,937,961)
                
Per share data:                
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations $(0.41) $(1.29)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations     (2.13)
Basic and diluted loss per share $(0.41) $(3.42)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted  52,941,525   11,544,818 
Basic loss per share from continuing operations $(2.22) $(4.12)
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations     (0.03)
Basic loss per share $(2.22) $(4.15)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic  5,361,767   5,294,152 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
            
Cash and cash equivalents $18,020,159  $3,476,673  $8,724,546  $18,020,159 
Goodwill and other intangibles 5,799,066  10,021,476   985,989   5,799,066 
Total assets 26,309,653  34,745,160   15,899,679   26,309,653 
Total liabilities 1,833,231  9,834,723   1,483,139   1,833,231 
Stockholders’ equity 24,476,422  24,910,437   14,416,540   24,476,422 

 
1920

 

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this report.  The discussion in this report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.  The cautionary statements made in this report should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this report.  Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here.


Business Overview and Recent Events

HSW International, Inc. (“HSWI”) is an online publishing company that develops and operates Internet businesses focused on providing consumers in the world’s digital economies with locally relevant, high quality information, and ways to connectprovides web platform services that support traditional web publishing combined with each other.social media.  Our international websites published under the HowStuffWorks brand provide readers in China and Brazil with thousands of articles about how the world around them works, serving as destinations for credible, easy-to-understand reference information.  HSW International is the exclusive licensee in China and Brazil for the digital publication of translated content from HowStuffWorks.com, a subsidiary of Discovery Communications, Inc.,’s HowStuffWorks.com, and in China for the digital publication of translated content from World Book Inc., publisher of World Book Encyclopedia.  Our DailyStrength business, which was acquired on November 26, 2008, helps hundredsco-founding and continuing development of thousandsSharecare will create a highly searchable social Q&A healthcare platform organizing and answering the questions of readers share informationhealth, in partnership with Harpo Productions, Sony Pictures Television, Discovery Communications, Jeff Arnold, and support on www.dailystrength.org, a comprehensive health-related social media website.  The acquisition of DailyStrength was completedDr. Mehmet Oz.  Sony Pictures Television became an investor in part to diversify our businessSharecare shortly after the initial transactions among Sharecare, Harpo Productions, Discovery Communications, HSW International, Mr. Arnold, and to publish another product which offers insight on highly relevant topics.Dr. Oz.  We generate revenue primarily through the sale of online advertising on our websites.websites and through service fees charged to clients for web platform development and operation services.  We were incorporated in Delaware in March 2006.  Our headquarters are located at One Capital City Plaza, 33503280 Peachtree Road, Suite 1600,600, Atlanta, Georgia  30326.30305.
In October 2009 the Company entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with Sharecare, Inc.  Sharecare is a venture among Dr. Mehmet Oz, a leading cardiac surgeon, health expert and host of “The Dr. Oz Show”; HARPO Productions, producer of “The Oprah Winfrey Show”; Discovery Communications, the world’s largest non-fiction media company; Jeff Arnold, WebMD founder and Discovery Communications’ Chief of Global Digital Strategy; Sony Pictures Television; and HSWI.  Sharecare was founded to develop and build a web platform that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing all of the questions of health and providing multiple answers representing different points of view.  As a result of these transactions, we received an equity stake in Sharecare (20% initially, approximately 18% as of March 31, 2010, as a result of subsequent sales of equity by Sharecare to third parties), sold substantially all of the assets of our DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare, agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare and received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for our own businesses.  Additionally, we issued a promissory note to Sharecare for $1.0 million, all of which was offset by services we provided to Sharecare and the promissory note is now paid in full and cancelled.  Finally, Sharecare assumed the potential earn-out payment of up to $3.525 million under the merger agreement by which the Company acquired DailyStrength.  We generated revenue of approximately $1.9 million over the last half of 2009 as a result of performing services for Sharecare.


Business Trends

A portion of our business consists of websites we recently established or acquired.  We expect that our business should grow as these websites achieve greater awareness within their markets, resulting in increased usage against which we can sell advertising.  While significant online advertising markets exist in the United States and Brazil, we believe it will take additional time for meaningful online advertisement rates to develop in China.  A recent addition to our service offering includes web platform services.  We currently have one customer for our web platform services business and intend to continue prudent investments in building this business for serving multiple customers.

Our Brazilian website ComoTudoFunciona, which launched in March 2007, is our most mature business.  The number of page views for ComoTudoFunciona has increased by 50% during the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  Additionally, the number of unique visitors to the website has increased by 47% for the same periods.  Year-over-year growth in page views and time spentunique visitors was 29% and 35%, respectively.

21

Our Chinese website BoWenWang launched in June 2008, and results show usage development consistent with a recently-launched website.  Unlike in Brazil, where we established our website with significant promotional commitments from one of the country’s largest Internet portals, BoWenWang launched with a focus on organic traffic development.  This contributed to initial usage trending below that in Brazil, though the overall traffic in China has now surpassed Brazil.  We believe that by focusing on developing business relationships to further the exposure of the website, we should be able to continue to grow usage but are cautious on the revenue outlook since the current economic environment in China and the rate of development of its Internet advertising market has been slower to develop than originally forecasted.

The number of page views for BoWenWang increased 312% during 2009 compared to the six months ended 2008.  Additionally, the number of unique visitors to the website increased 53% for the same period.  We expect to see growth in the number of users and page views, which we believe should result in increased revenues for our Web sites indicates volume of traffic to our sitesChinese website.

Both seasonal fluctuations in Internet usage and traditional retail seasonality have affected, and are key non-financial metrics we monitor, because they can influencelikely to continue to affect, our advertising revenue ratesbusiness.  Internet usage generally slows during the summer months, and expenditures by advertisers typically increase in the fourth quarter of each year.  These seasonal trends have caused and will likely continue to cause, fluctuations in our overall advertising revenue.  We also monitor overall Internet advertising trends as indicators of our performance.  Because data on Brazil and China is limited, we watch U.S. trends as a proxy, although trends might vary country-by-country.quarterly results.

The advertising market declined overall declined in 2008 and 2009 due to the global economic slowdown.downturn.  This decline affected online advertising expenditures as well.  The result for uswell, and has beenresulted in lower revenue for our business than expected, evenexpected.  The economic environment might cause advertisers to continue to reduce the amount they spend on online advertising, which could negatively affect the growth rate of our revenues.  The international economic challenges contributed to the impairment charge we took as of December 31, 2009 for the intangible asset of the licenses to operate in Brazil.China.  If operating results deteriorate or do not improve, or if unfavorable changes occur in other economic factors used to estimate fair values, we might incur additional non-cash impairment charges to our intangible assets in the future.

In this tough economy,Given our investments and progress in building our infrastructure and developing our personnel over the past years, in 2009 we began offering web platform services to other companies seeking cost effective solutions for developing and operating innovative websites.  Our newest business leverages our existing expertise in innovative web platform design and development, including our own websites in Brazil and China as well as the Web 3.0 platform we are cautious regardingdeveloping, and our ability to support and service web platforms and applications.

Recognizing the difficulty of the economic environment, we have further reduced certain operating expenses and have cut costs in the fourth quarter of 2009 tofor fiscal year 2010 in an attempt to better align our spending with our expectations for growth within each product line.growth.  We acquired DailyStrengthcontinue to invest in November 2008building what we believe are the necessary employee and accordingly have added related operating expensessystems infrastructures required to manage our 2009 budget. Since then, we have implemented cost-cutting measures in our headcount and third-party and other professional services to better align our operating costs with our revised growth expectations and partially offset the additional charges related to DailyStrength.  As described above, we expect challenges in our revenue growth and margins for 2009.  As a result,develop and promote our products and services.  Additionally, we closely monitor our cash status and our progress and likelihoodplan to maintain an awareness of success in eachthe alignment of our markets.  Accordingly,costs and revenues, and make operating adjustments as we might decidebelieve necessary to suspend our activities in one or more of our markets in order to focus our limited resources in the other(s).best position HSW International for success.

The INTAC Merger

We completed the INTAC Merger on October 2, 2007 to assist in the development of our digital content database exclusively licensed from HowStuffWorks by (i) accelerating our obtaining Internet licenses in China for launching our Internet platform, (ii) obtaining INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies to accelerate the growth of our Internet platforms in China, and (iii) providing additional cash flow from INTAC’s established businesses.  These established businesses included services related to wireless telephone training and the development and sale of educational software delivered to customers in China (“INTAC Legacy Businesses”).  As discussed below, the INTAC Legacy Businesses were subsequently disposed.

Prior to the consummation of the merger with INTAC, we had only limited assets and operations incident to our formation and in preparation for the merger with INTAC and subsequent business.

20

In conjunction with the INTAC Merger:

·  HowStuffWorks contributed exclusive digital publishing rights to HowStuffWorks’ content for China and Brazil;
·  our stock became publicly traded on the NASDQ Global Market under the symbol “HSWI”; and
·  certain investors contributed $39.4 million (before expenses).

As more fully discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report to Form 10-K, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price of $47.9 million resulted in approximately $29.0 million of goodwill primarily from our expectations that we could utilize INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies to accelerate the growth of our Internet platforms in China.  However, as discussed below, we disposed of the entire INTAC Legacy Businesses on February 29, 2008.

Business Development

On November 26, 2008, we acquired DailyStrengthIn October 2009 the Company joined with Dr. Mehmet Oz, Harpo Productions, Discovery Communications, Sony Pictures Television and Jeff Arnold to diversify our business.  This acquisition provides us with a footprintform Sharecare, Inc., which is developing an innovative healthcare platform for consumers to ask, learn and act on the questions of health.

HSW International and the other co-founders of Sharecare each hold minority equity positions in the UScompany.  Additionally, HSW International has entered into a service agreement with Sharecare to develop the company’s next generation platform and website, leveraging HSWI’s expertise in online content platforms.  As part of the transaction, HSW International sold its DailyStrength business to Sharecare.  We originally acquired the DailyStrength assets to enter the healthcare digital market in the US.  Our October transactions with Sharecare provided us the possibility of being a part of a far larger opportunity within the online healthcare media industry.  We believe the DailyStrength assets complement the Sharecare web platform, and we believe this addition is synergisticexpect that operational collaborations will emerge in managing the web assets under one entity.  We expect that operating both web properties together will provide greater benefit and valuation to the Sharecare entity and eventually to our existing technology.investment in the Sharecare venture.  As part of our strategic operating purpose of entering the venture, we provide services to Sharecare as well as ongoing support and development services to the DailyStrength website and other Sharecare web platforms.  The DailyStrength acquisition extendsSharecare website will be a highly searchable social Question & Answer platform, backed by a comprehensive information architecture that creates and organizes the questions of health.  HSW International’s proven publishingInternational and the other founders received a license to use this platform with social networking applicationsto develop businesses in other content categories.

22

HSW International developed and communities.  DailyStrength hosts more than 500 communities focused on issues such as weight loss, divorce, parenting and illnesses. Userslaunched Sharecare’s initial Q&A content located at http://ask.doctoroz.com, which features a subset of the site both readinitial questions and interact with high-quality, reference information. The site features health journals, discussion forums, virtual hugs, member-created groups,answers from Sharecare and treatment reviews plus uniqueits content provided on a daily basis by physicians and other health professionals.partners.


Our Operations

ComoTudoFunciona – HowStuffWorks Brazil

We enteredComoTudoFunciona (http://hsw.com.br) is Brazil's online source for credible, unbiased and easy-to-understand explanations of how the Brazilian online publishing marketworld actually works.  The Portuguese-language site is the exclusive digital publisher in Brazil of translated and localized content from the leading Discovery Communications brand HowStuffWorks, and is published from HSWI's São Paulo offices.  ComoTudoFunciona was established in March 2007.  At2007, and as of December 31, 2008, we2009, had approximately 5,500published over 6,200 articles that were either (i) articles from the HowStuffWorks content database translated from English to Portuguese, or (ii) originally created content.  The web site address is http://hsw.com.br/.content or translated and localized from HowStuffWorks.  We are continuing the development of our business strategy in Brazil as we continue to expandfocus on expansion by (i) adding original proprietary digital content designed to meet the information needs of the Brazilian online community, (ii) expanding the amount of translated content from HowStuffWorks, and (iii) refining local marketing and business development strategies.  We recognized approximately $405,000$178,000 and $148,000$405,000 of revenue from Brazil during the yearstwelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  The decrease in Brazil revenue is due to sales to affiliates recorded during 2008 that did not recur in 2009.  Results of operations are included in the digital online publishing reporting segment.
BoWenWang – HowStuffWorks China

BoWenWang (http://www.bowenwang.com.cn) is an information and 2007, respectively.reference website that provides China with encyclopedic knowledge and easy-to-understand explanations of how the world works.  The website is published from Beijing in the Chinese language.  Launched in June 2008, BoWenWang features a combination of original content authored by the Company, translated and localized articles from the leading Discovery Communications brand HowStuffWorks, and content from World Book, Inc.

In June 2008, we entered China’s online publishing market utilizing a combinationBoWenWang is the exclusive digital publisher in China of the contributed assets fromtranslated HowStuffWorks with the benefit of INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses.content.  In September 2008, we announcedentered into an exclusive content partnership with World Book, Inc. to dramatically increase the amount of content published on BoWenWang.  In 2009, World Book will createcreated thousands of original Chinese-language articles providing information on allmany branches of knowledge, including arts, sciences, history, technology, mathematics, sports, and recreation, exclusively for HSW International's Beijing-based website, BoWenWang (http://www.bowenwang.com.cn/).our Chinese website.  At December 31, 2008,2009, we had approximately 4,400 articles.published almost 11,000 articles in China.

WeRevenue generated from the operations based in China was approximately $19,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.  No revenue was generated from the operations based in China during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.  Results of operations are developing our business strategy for DailyStrength with emphasis on expanding its offerings,included in addition to integrating the best of DailyStrength’s social media technologies into HSW International’s webdigital online publishing platform.reporting segment.


DailyStrength

Now owned by Sharecare, DailyStrength.org offers content authored by medical professionals based on current topics, support groups, a treatment directory with definitions, private messaging, one-on-one chat forumsmessage boards and personal goal trackers, and primarily serves English speakingEnglish-speaking territories such as the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.  The medical panel of professionals contributes articles and journals providing insight to a number of topics relevant to the DSDailyStrength user group and communities.  Additionally, DailyStrength offers users and its user group create onlinemembers the opportunity to launch communities and supportfor groups of like-minded individuals regarding topics of personal significance using leading community tools to interact.

On October 30, 2009, we sold substantially all of the assets of DailyStrength to Sharecare as part of the Sharecare Transactions.  As a result, DailyStrength is no longer an operating segment of our Company.  Instead, we provide services to help people copeSharecare for the DailyStrength website under the Letter Agreement for Services described below.  In addition, we own a minority investment in Sharecare, as further discussed below.  Results of operations for DailyStrength through October 2009 are included in the social media reporting segment.
23

Investment in Sharecare – a related party
On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with Sharecare, Inc.  (the "Sharecare Transactions"), which was established as a venture among: Dr. Mehmet Oz, a leading cardiac surgeon, health stressexpert and host of “The Dr. Oz Show”; HARPO Productions, producer of “The Oprah Winfrey Show”; Discovery Communications, the world’s largest non-fiction media company; Jeff Arnold, WebMD founder and Discovery Communications’ Chief of Global Digital Strategy; and HSWI.  Sharecare was created to build a web-based platform that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing a vast array of the questions of health and providing multiple answers from experts, organizations, publishers, and caregivers representing various points of view.

As a result of these transactions, the Company:
·  Entered into a subscription agreement for the purchase of 125,000 shares of common stock of Sharecare, representing 20% ownership of Sharecare at the time of purchase;
·  Sold substantially all of the assets of its DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare;
·  Agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare; and
·  Received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for HSWI's own businesses. 

Additionally, the Company issued a promissory note for $1 million to Sharecare, all of which has been satisfied by services the Company provided to Sharecare during 2009.  Finally, Sharecare assumed the potential earn-out payment of up to $3.525 million under the merger agreement by which the Company acquired DailyStrength.  
Jeff Arnold, a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors, is the Chairman and Chief Architect and a significant stockholder of Sharecare.  Additionally, Discovery Communications, Inc., HSWI’s largest stockholder, is a significant stockholder of Sharecare.  HSWI’s Board of Directors established a Special Committee consisting of three independent directors without any interests in Sharecare to evaluate and recommend the terms of these transactions to the Board.  The Special Committee engaged a third party financial advisor to provide a fairness opinion on the totality of the transactions.
Web Platform Services

In October 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement for Services with Sharecare pursuant to which the Company agreed to perform services related to the design, development, hosting and related services necessary to launch and operate the Sharecare website through our direct activities and management of third party vendors.  Sharecare agreed to pay us for the fully burdened cost of our personnel dedicated to the services and other challengescosts incurred in providing the services plus a fixed monthly management fee for services performed since July 1, 2009.  Although we performed services for Sharecare during the third quarter of modern life – issues that people2009, we were not able to recognize the world over face daily.associated revenue until the effective date of the services agreement, October 30, 2009.  Therefore, the revenue recognized during the Company’s fourth quarter represents six months of revenue related to services rendered before and after the effective date of the services agreement.  This agreement will expire on June 30, 2010, unless the Company and Sharecare agree to extend the term or enter into a new services agreement.

The majority of our revenue recognized in 2009 resulted from the services we performed for Sharecare.  Additionally, the revenue recognized in the fourth quarter of 2009 reflects services rendered since July 1, 2009.


Sale of the INTAC Legacy Businesses (Discontinued Operations) and Related Transactions

Due to an increased focus of our management and resources on our primary Internet publishing business, a change of control in our majority ownership leading to further refinement in our strategies, and an under performanceunder-performance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses after the INTAC Merger, in early 2008 we decided to dispose of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.those businesses.  The INTAC Legacy Businesses were comprised of two lines of business which were both unrelated to our core Internet platform businesses.


21



We had originally estimated when deciding to acquireIn February and March 2008, we sold the INTAC Legacy Businesses that, in addition to accelerating our obtaining Internet licenses in China for launching our Internet platform, INTAC would provide us (i) further knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies to accelerate the growth of our Internet platforms in China, and (ii) additional cash flow from its established businesses.  Following the underperformance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses in the fourth quarter of 2007, that resulted in short-term negative cash flow from these operations of $1.1 million, and a change-in-control of our business through the acquisition of our largest shareholder, HowStuffWorks, by Discovery, we reconsidered the potential risk of excessive short-term consumption of cash and management resources by our acquired non-core INTAC Legacy Businesses and refined our strategic direction.

We decided that it was critical that all our current resources be fully focused on expanding our Brazilian platform and the June 2008 launch of our Chinese Internet platform.  Although we believe we have benefited in the short-term from INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses, this refined strategic focus did not allow us the time required to realize the expected long-term synergies, embodied in our acquired INTAC goodwill, from INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies.  In addition, we were provided with and acted on an opportunity to sell the unrelated INTAC Legacy Businesses for approximately their stand-alone appraised value, and through simultaneous sale of the treasury stock received, generate significant additional cash resources for investing into our core Internet businesses.

At December 31, 2007, we recognized a loss of $24.7 million related to the February 29, 2008, INTAC legacy disposition and has been recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a loss of $133,526, which has been recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  All the goodwill resulting from the INTAC acquisition was included in the INTAC Legacy Businesses when we determined the potential write off, because such operations had not been integrated with our online publishing segment prior to our decision to dispose of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.

On February 29, 2008, we completed the sale of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.  The INTAC Legacy Businesses were sold to China Trend Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation that isentity owned by Mr.Wei Zhou, CEO, director and significant stockholdershareholder of INTAC prior to the INTAC Merger in October 2007.  Mr. Zhou was alsoand a member of our board of directors from October 2007 to Decemberin 2007.  In accordanceWe funded the businesses with the share purchase agreement with China Trend Holdings, we were to receive 5.0$4.3 million of our common shares owned by Mr. Zhou.  In addition, as a condition to the February 29, 2008, INTAC Legacy Businessescash, net of disposition the INTAC Legacy Businesses were to include $4.5 million in cash at closing.

At the February 29, 2008, INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition, weexpenses, and received only 4.55.0 million shares of our common stock from Mr. Zhou and accordingly, we only funded the INTAC Legacy Businesses with $2.7 million in cash.  Mr. Zhou delivered his additional 0.5 million shares of our common stock to us on March 26, 2008, and on March 31, 2008, we released another $1.6 million in cash to the INTAC Legacy Businesses ($1.8 million for the stock received net of an estimated $0.2 million withheld for disposition expenses).  As of December 31, 2008, all of HSWI’s assets were in our core Internet businesses and the sole asset we retained from the INTAC Merger is the Internet licenses intangible we used to enter the Chinese markets in June 2008.exchange. 

24

On February 15, 2008, we entered into a stock purchase agreement where we agreed to sell, and two qualified institutional buyers agreed to purchase, the 5.0 million shares of our common stock received from the INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition at a purchase price of $3.68$36.80 per share.  Simultaneously with the February 29, 2008 disposition, weWe simultaneously sold the 4.5an additional 500,000 shares to institutional buyers in a private placement raising $18.4 million shares we received to the institutional buyers.  Subsequently on March 26, 2008, we sold the additional 0.5 million shares from Mr. Zhou to the institutional buyers.cash.


 
22

 


Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 20082009, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20072008

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20082009, and 2007.2008.  As discussed in Notes 1,Note 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, HSWI merged with INTAC International Inc. on October 2, 2007, and the INTAC Legacy Businesses were subsequently disposed on February 29, 2008.  Following the disposition, the sole asset we retained from INTAC is the indefinite-lived Internet Licenses intangible asset and no revenue was realized from this asset in 2008 or 2007.asset.  INTAC’s results of operations have been recorded within discontinued operations for both years presented.2008.

HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Operating revenue      
Digital online publishing
 $234,144  $147,535 
Sales to affiliates
  222,862    
Total revenue
  457,006   147,535 
         
Cost of services  987,266   1,242,252 
         
Gross margin  (530,260)  (1,094,717)
         
Operating expenses        
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based
        
compensation expense of $4,787,756 and $7,203,738
        
in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
  15,678,365   13,710,723 
Licenses to operate in China impairment
  7,850,000    
Depreciation and amortization
  223,548   57,748 
Total operating expenses
  23,751,913   13,768,471 
         
Loss from continuing operations before other income        
(expense) and income taxes
  (24,282,173)  (14,863,188)
         
Other income (expense)        
Interest income
  515,238   51,754 
Interest expense
     (39,912)
Total other income (expense)
  515,238   11,842 
         
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (23,766,935)  (14,851,346)
         
Deferred income tax benefit  1,962,500    
         
Loss from continuing operations  (21,804,435)  (14,851,346)
         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes  (133,526)  (24,687,959)
         
Net loss $(21,937,961) $(39,539,305)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  52,941,525   11,544,818 
         
Net loss per basic and diluted shares $(0.41) $(3.42)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Operating revenue      
Digital online publishing $196,942  $182,054 
Social media  194,458   52,090 
Web platform services from affiliates  1,868,416    
Sales to affiliates     222,862 
        Total revenue
  2,259,816   457,006 
         
Cost of services  2,869,509   987,266 
         
Gross margin  (609,693)  (530,260)
         
Operating expenses        
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based        
    compensation expense of $1,780,168 and $4,787,756
        
    in 2009 and 2008, respectively)
  10,136,353   15,678,365 
Gain on sale of DailyStrength  (404,094)   
Impairment loss  1,180,440   7,850,000 
Depreciation and amortization  439,088   223,548 
        Total operating expenses
  11,351,787   23,751,913 
         
Loss from continuing operations        
   (11,961,480)  (24,282,173)
         
Non-operating income        
Interest income  50,515   515,238 
Other income  159,146    
        Total non-operating income
  209,661   515,238 
         
Loss before income taxes and  (11,751,819)  (23,766,935)
equity in loss of equity-method investment        
         
Income tax benefit  688,630   1,962,500 
Equity in loss of equity-method  investment, net of taxes  (818,087)   
         
         
Loss from continuing operations  (11,881,276)  (21,804,435)
         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes     (133,526)
         
Net loss $(11,881,276) $(21,937,961)
         
Basic weighted average shares outstanding (a)  5,361,767   5,294,152 
         

 
2325

 


Basic loss per share (a)        
  Loss from continuing operations  (2.22)  (4.12)
  Loss from discontinued operations     (0.03)
Net loss per share
 
 $(2.22) $(4.15)
(a)  All outstanding share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect HSWI’s February 2010 10-for-1 reverse stock split.  See Note 11, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

Revenues

RevenueWe generate the majority of our revenues from our web platform services segment based on our service agreement with Sharecare, which were approximately $1.9 million for the yearssix month period ended December 31, 20082009.  Our digital online publishing segment is comprised of our international website businesses based in Brazil and 2007 of approximately $405,000 and $148,000, respectively, was generated inChina.  In Brazil, where we launched our website in March 2007.2007, we generated revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008 of approximately $­­­178,000 and $405,000, respectively.  For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, approximately 86%63% of revenue was generated from paid-for-impression advertising and 14%37% was generated from pay-per-performance ads.  DailyStrength contributed approximately $52,000 ofIn China, we generated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008.2009, of approximately $19,000.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 35% of revenue was generated from paid-for-impression advertising, 23% was generated from pay-per-performance ads and 42% was generated from sponsorship advertising.  There was no China digital online publishing revenue duringin 2008 or 2007 as the website in China was launched in June 2008.  Based on current usage and trends, we expect advertising revenue to grow slightly in 2010.  Our social media segment is represented by the DailyStrength website and contributed approximately $194,000 and $52,000 of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively.  Similarly to 2009,  we expect the web platform services segment to continue to be our primary source of revenue during 2010.


Cost of Services

Cost of services includes the ongoing third-party costs to acquire original content, translate and localize and enhance articlescontent from English to Portuguese and Mandarin Chinese, as well as costs incurred to acquire original articles written bysupport our web platform services including labor, content and third parties.  Portuguese article translationparty platform support services. These costs totaled $777,000were $2.9 million and $719,000 and Chinese translation costs totaled $194,000 and $523,000$1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Operations – Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Our total selling, general and administrative expenses increased(“SG&A”) decreased by $2.0$5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20082009 as compared to 2007.2008.  The increasedecrease is primarily attributable to increasedthe cost reduction of approximately $600,000 resulting from the consolidation of certain administrative functions that lead to a reduction of headcount combined with a change in the classification of certain SG&A costs of establishing our operations related todirectly associated with performing the Brazil website, and launching the China website, as well as additionalweb platform services.  These costs incurred for compliance and operation as a public company.  The increases over 2007 are primarily comprised of $1.8 million in personnel costs, $2.1 million in professional fees related to operating as a public company, as well as continued investmentwere included in our platform and technology and $0.5 million associated with directors and officers insurance costs.  The increase is partially offset byCost of Services classification described above.  Additionally we experienced$2.4$3.0 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 20082009, as compared to 2007 (see Note 10 to Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report to Form 10-K).2008.  Stock-based compensation expense is a non-cash item, and in 20082009 totaled $4.8$1.8 million.  This amount was based primarily onThe decrease in stock-based compensation expense year-over-year reflects vesting during the year2009 of options at exercise prices at the lower end of options ranging from $6.50$3.85 per share to $7.10$71.00 per share, reflecting our higher stock price in earlier periods when the options were granted.  Professional fees decreased by approximately $700,000 as costs related to the INTAC disposition were recorded in 2008.

Gain on Sale of DailyStrength

On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into a series of transactions to form Sharecare, a venture established to build a web-based platform that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing a vast array of the questions of health and providing multiple answers from experts, organizations, publishers, and caregivers representing various points of view.  The DailyStrength website offers content authored by medical professionals based on current topics, support groups, a treatment directory with definitions, private messaging, message boards and personal goal trackers.

On October 30, 2009, we sold substantially all of the assets of DailyStrength to Sharecare under the Sharecare Transactions.  GAAP guidance under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810 defines this transaction as a deconsolidation and requires a mathematical computation of a gain or loss
26

related to the deconsolidation based on the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the fair value of consideration received.  Accordingly, we recognized a gain of approximately $400,000 on the sale of the DailyStrength assets to Sharecare.
Impairment Loss

WeAs a result of our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, we recorded anindefinite-lived intangible asset impairment chargecharges of $1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the licenses to operate in China.  The most significant change to the prior year valuation was a downward revision to projected cash flows due to declines in the Company’s projected sales in China from its previous projections.  We continue to expect to receive operational benefits from the licenses to operate in China as these licenses are essential to our ongoing business in China.  Accordingly, we continue to carry an intangible asset of approximately $970,000 after the impairment charges.  We have experienced positive trends regarding traffic patterns to our China website and expect that further growth in visitors and recurring visits will provide a basis for our website to generate more revenue than experienced in the amount of $7.9 million (see Note 6).prior year.
Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $216,000 due to increased amortization expense in 2009 for the DailyStrength intangible assets because we purchased the assets in November 2008.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased by approximately $465,000 due to decreased cash balances combined with decreases in interest rates available.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) increased approximately $503,000$159,146 for the year ended December 31, 20082009 as compared to 2007.2008.  The increase in interestother income reflects an increase in cash on hand resulting from the sale of our stock to certain institutional investorsearly termination fee paid by an advertising customer during our first quarter.  The decrease in interest expense is due to full payment on an affiliated party loan during the fourth quarter of 2007.2009.

Deferred Income Tax Benefit

We recorded a $2.0 million$688,630 tax benefit related to the impairment charge against the licenses to operate in China intangible asset.asset and the contribution of the DailyStrength assets to Sharecare.


Loss in Equity Investment

We account for our investment in Sharecare under the equity method of accounting.  During 2009, we recognized a loss in the equity investment of $818,087, net of taxes.

 
2427

 


Discontinued Operations – INTAC Legacy Businesses

The discussion that follows relates to the INTAC Legacy Businesses results of operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.2008.  Revenue was for services related to wireless telephone training and the development and sale of educational software in China.  The $0.5 million$500,000 loss from discontinued operations in 2008 was reduced by a $0.4 million$400,000 gain upon final disposition onin February 29, 2008.  The $24.7 million loss from discontinued operations in 2007 was primarily due to a goodwill write off of approximately $22.5 million related to the February 29, 2008 disposition of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.

 Years Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008  2007  2008 
         
Revenues $38,849  $198,627  $38,849 
Loss from discontinued operations (before income taxes) (133,526) (24,687,959)  (133,526)
Loss from discontinued operations $(133,526) $(24,687,959) $(133,526)


As discussed above and more fully in NotesNote 2 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the INTAC goodwill write off is the result of the subsequent sale of the INTAC Legacy Businesses onin February 29, 2008.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

The global financial downturn continues to have a negative effect on the demand for advertising in general, including online advertising.  Economic uncertainty has had and might continue to have a direct impact on our revenue as orders for online advertising have declined and our typical advertiser is spending less per order than in the prior year.  Also, our businesses in Brazil and China, which we launched in the past few years, are still in a development stage as the related websites continue to build towards a critical mass of traffic volume.  In consideration of projected market conditions and near-term revenue expectations, we consolidated certain administrative functions at the end of our fourth quarters of 2008 and 2009 to reduce headcount and better align our costs with our 2009 strategic initiatives which resulted in cost reductions.  We consistently monitor our cash position to make adjustments as we believe necessary to maintain our operational objectives of funding ongoing operations and continuing to make technological investments in our websites and their respective brands.

We expect to continue to expend significant resources in expanding and gaining market share for our Internetinternet platforms in Brazil and China, and to develop our healthcare social networking strategy, including up-front expendituresadditional investments to create or acquire content.  These expendituresWe currently do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures.  Our anticipated investments will be made in the respective markets based on our success and anticipated market conditions and trends.  We expect that most of these expendituresinvestments will be paid or under commitment before we begin to realize significant revenues.  Additionally, in the normal course of business, we continue to explore various business initiatives that may lead to additional sources of revenue and growth.  We believe that our current cash balance, andcombined with our expected cash generated from future operations will beand recently implemented cost reduction measures, should provide sufficient cash to fund operations for longer thanat least the next twelve months.  IfHowever, if cash on hand and generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, we may be required tomight implement further cost reduction strategies, sell additional equity or obtain bankdebt financing to fund further development and attain profitability.  There is no assurance that such financing will be available or that we will be able to complete financing on satisfactory terms, if at all.all, or that we will achieve profitability.

We expect that our recently announced service agreement with Sharecare will generate revenues for our company.  However, as Sharecare is a newly formed entity and the service agreement expires in June 2010, there can be no assurance that the amounts generated will be sufficient to cover our liquidity needs for the long-term.

Cash and cash equivalents was $8.7 million at December 31, 2009, compared to $18.0 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2007.2008.  The increasedecrease in cash is primarily attributable to the saleuse of our stock during the first quarter of 2008.cash to fund operations.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, our cumulative losses were $74.2$85.7 million, which included non-cash expenses of $21.8$23.5 million for stock-based compensation, $22.5 million goodwill write-off related to the February 29, 2008 INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition, and an impairment charge of $5.9 million, net of tax.$7.9 million.  We used a significant amount of the $21.0 million net proceeds from the October 2, 2007, sale of stock to pay transaction costs, to pay off advances from HowStuffWorks, and to fund operations.  As previously disclosed, in the first quarter of 2008, we received an additional $33.4 million before expenses from the sale of our stock.

28


Cash flows from operations used in operating activities

Our net cash used in continuing operating activities during 2008 increased2009 decreased by $4.3$2.7 million compared to the prior year.  The increasedecrease in cash used was due to increased funding requirements to support our operationscost cutting measures we implemented in Brazil and China while building and maintaining our technology infrastructure.2009.  Net cash used in discontinued operating activities was $0.5 million and $5.1 million$500,000 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.2008.


Cash used in investing activities

During the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, net cash used in investing activities was $130,000 compared to $8.5 million compared to $0.6 million in 2007.  Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2008 reflects $4.5 million of cash used in conjunction with the sale of our INTAC Legacy Businesses, $3.2 million of cash used to acquire DailyStrength, as well as the purchases of property and equipment.2008.


 
25

 


Cash flows from financing activities

For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, there was no net cash provided by financing activities was approximatelyversus $35.2 million versus $16.5 million for 2007.2008.  The significant increase in 2008difference is a direct result of the proceeds we received from the sale of our common stock during the first quarter.quarter of 2008.


Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  We believe that of our significant accounting policies, revenue recognition, stock-based compensation and long-lived assets including goodwill and other intangible assets may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.


Revenue Recognition

OnlineWe recognize online publishing revenue is generally recognized as visitors are exposed to or react to advertisements on our website.  Revenue is generatedWe generate revenue from advertising in the form of sponsored links and image ads.  This includes both pay-per-performance ads and paid-for-impression advertising.  In the pay-per-performance model, we earn revenue based on the number of clicks associated with such ad; in the paid-for-impression model (sponsorships), revenue is derived from the display of ads.

We recognize web platform services revenue at the time services are performed.  All of our services revenue is related to the design, development, hosting and other services required to launch and operate the Sharecare, DailyStrength and Ask Dr. Oz websites through our direct activities and management of third party vendors.  Our services agreement with Sharecare was effective October 30, 2009.  We began providing services to Sharecare in anticipation of this agreement in July 2009; however, we only began recognizing revenue in our fourth quarter of 2009 once the services agreement became effective.  The Sharecare-related revenue is classified within our web platform services segment.

We recognize revenue when the service has been provided, and the other criteria set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, Revenue Recognition, have been met; namely, the fees we charge are fixed or determinable, we and our advertisers understand the specific nature and terms of the agreed-upon transactions and the collectability is reasonably assured.


Stock-Based Compensation

Under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan adopted April 13, 2006 (the “Plan”), HSWI authorized 8,000,000800,000 shares for grant as part of a long term incentive plan to attract, retain and motivate its eligible executives, employees, officers, directors and consultants.  Options to purchase common stock under the Plan have been granted to our officers and employees with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.  Additionally in 2008, we granted restricted shares were granted to certain members of
29

our Board of Directors and executives at the fair market value on the grant date.  As of December 31, 2008,2009, no options had been exercised under the Plan.

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R)Codification ASC 718, which requires us to recognize expense related to the fair value of our stock-based compensation awards.

SFAS 123(R)ASC 718 requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of the stock based awards.  We have elected to use the Black-Scholes options pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options on the dates of grant, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.ASC 718.  We measure stock-based compensation based on the fair values of all stock-based awards on the dates of grant, and recognize stock-based compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting periods.  Stock-based compensation expense was $4.8$1.8 million and $7.2$4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20082009, and 2007,2008, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets Including Goodwill
Impairment of Property and Other Intangible AssetsEquipment

We review propertyProperty and equipment and amortizable intangible assetsis tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that theits carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Such events include significant adverse changes in the business climate, the impact of significant customer losses, unanticipated current period operating or cash flow losses, forecasted continuing losses or a current expectation that an asset group will be disposed of before the end of its useful life.  Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to future net cash flows the assets are expected to generate.  The carrying valueFor purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, property and equipment are grouped with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the intangible asset is comparedcash flows of other assets.  As of September 30, 2009, and in anticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis on our property and equipment in our social media reportable segment.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  Other than the sale of our DailyStrength assets, no other triggering events occurred at December 31, 2009, that would have caused the Company to believe that the fair value in order to determine if an impairment exists.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of theits property and equipment had declined below its carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.value.


26



In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and OtherImpairment of Definite-Lived Intangible Assets, we test goodwill and indefinite lived

Amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually at December 31, or more frequently ifwhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that this asset may be impaired.  SFAS 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate an asset’sthe carrying valueamount may not be recoverable.  The carrying amount of an asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  We monitor our assets for potential impairment on an ongoing basis.  As of September 30, 2009, and in accordance with SFAS 144, Accountinganticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis on the majority of our definite-lived intangible assets.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  In October 2009, we sold the majority of our definite-lived intangible assets to Sharecare.  No impairment test was necessary at December 31, 2009.


Goodwill Impairment

Generally, we perform our annual assessment for impairment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, unless facts and circumstances require differently.  We determine recoverability by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill applies to the carrying value, including goodwill, of that reporting unit using a discounted cash flow model. Estimating the fair value of the reporting unit involves uncertainties, because it requires management to develop numerous assumptions, including assumptions about the future growth and potential volatility in revenues and costs, capital expenditures, industry economic factors and future business strategy.  The variability of the factors that management uses to perform the goodwill impairment test depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events and cash flows.  All such factors are interdependent and, therefore, do not change in isolation.  Accordingly, our accounting estimates may materially change from period to period due to changing market factors.  Significant judgments in this area involve determining whether a triggering event has occurred, determining the future cash flows for the Impairment or Disposalassets involved and determining the proper discount rate to be applied in determining fair value.
30

As of Long-Lived Assets.September 30, 2009, and in anticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis of our goodwill.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  We amortizesubsequently sold the DailyStrength assets to Sharecare and as of December 31, 2009, no goodwill remains and therefore no impairment test was necessary.

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment

We performed an impairment test of our acquiredindefinite-lived intangible assets with definite lives over threeas of September 30, 2009, as a result of the planned disposition of the website trade names related to eleven years.  We recorded anthe Sharecare transaction.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  In October 2009, the website trade names were sold to Sharecare.
As a result our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, we recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $5.9$1.2 million net of tax, ofduring the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the licenses to operate in China intangible asset due to the resultsChina.  The calculation of the fair value of the Company’s licenses to operate in China was performed consistently with the annual test performed at December 31, 2008, with updated assumptions where appropriate.  The most significant change to the prior year valuation was a downward revision to projected cash flows due to declines in the Company’s projected sales in China from its previous projections.  The Company tests its indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are licenses to operate in China, for impairment analysis.by utilizing discounted cash flow models to estimate their fair values.  These cash flow models involve several assumptions.  Changes in the Company’s assumptions could materially impact its fair value estimates.  Assumptions critical to its fair value estimates are: (i) weighted-average cost of capital rates used to derive the present value factors used in determining the fair value; (ii) projected annual revenue growth rates used in the models; and (iii) projected long-term growth rates used in the derivation of terminal year values.  The valuation of our China license requires us to estimate the period of time a hypothetical market participant, which we define as an internet company wishing to establish a presence in China, would need to obtain our Chinese business licenses.  Other assumptions include estimates of projected capital expenditures, upfront costs incurred to obtain similar licenses, and working capital requirements.  These and other assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future based on period-specific facts and circumstances.  
The following table presents the range of assumptions the Company used to derive its fair value estimates during the impairment test conducted in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Assumptions
Weighted-average cost of capital27.50 %
Long-term growth rates7 %
Annual revenue growth rates14.0-127.0%
Time required to obtain similar licenses   9 months


If the Company makes additional downward revisions to its cash flow projections in the future, the Company may experience material impairment charges to the remaining carrying amount of its licenses to operate in China.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006,January 2010, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements.  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles inauthoritative guidance that expands the United States (“GAAP”), and expandsrequired disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157This guidance provides for new disclosures requiring the Company to (i) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements.  This guidance also provides clarification of existing disclosures requiring the Company to (i) determine each class of assets and liabilities based on the nature and risks of the investments rather than by major security type and (ii) for each class of assets and liabilities, disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements.  The company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that incorporates Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The guidance is effective for interim and annual
31

periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us).  All GAAP references have been updated to comply with the new guidance.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that incorporates Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The new requirements are effective as of the beginning of an enterprise’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us).  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that incorporates Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The new requirements are effective for transfers of financial assets occurring in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us).  The company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States.  This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  All GAAP references have been updated to comply with the new guidance.

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that revises the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be more qualitative in nature and requires companies to more frequently reassess whether they must consolidate a VIE.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us), for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.  We are currently evaluating the effect of adopting this guidance.

In May 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance for subsequent events which did not result in significant changes to previous guidance.  This new guidance establishes general standards for disclosure of the date events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the report is issued or available to be issued.  This requirement was effective for statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  Entities were required to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated.  In February 2010, this guidance was amended by the FASB to remove the requirement for SEC filers (as defined in Accounting Standards Update 2010-09) to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.

In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that provides additional guidance and disclosure requirements regarding the recognition and measurement of contingent assets acquired and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination where the fair value of the contingent assets and liabilities cannot be determined as of the acquisition date.  This guidance is effective for acquisitions occurring after January 1, 2009.  The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company, and its future impact will be dependent upon the specific terms of future business combinations, if any.

In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.  This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted.  The Company did not have financial instruments as of December 31, 2009, therefore, the Company is not impacted by this guidance.

In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for us) with early adoption prohibited.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on net loss per share for any periods presented.

In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that delayed the effective date for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009.  This guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, a fair value measurement would be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for non-financing assets and liabilities.  The adoption of SFAS 157this guidance, as of January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as the Company had no financial assets other than cash and accounts receivable.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009.  We are currently evaluating the impact FSP 157-2 will have on ourcondensed consolidated financial statements.

An associated pronouncement, SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, was also effective at the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year.  The Company has elected not to apply the fair value option to measure any of the financial assets and liabilities on its balance sheet not already valued at fair value under other accounting pronouncements.  These other financial assets and liabilities are primarily accounts receivable and accounts payable, which are reported at historical value.  The fair value of these financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value because of their short duration.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations.  SFAS 141(R) expands the definition of a business combination and requires the fair value of the purchase price of an acquisition, including the issuance of equity securities, to be determined on the acquisition date.  SFAS 141(R) also requires that all assets, liabilities, contingent considerations, and contingencies of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date.  In addition, SFAS 141(R) requires that acquisition costs generally be expensed as incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period impact income tax expense.  SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 with early adoption prohibited.  We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 141(R) will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51.  SFAS 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be required to be reported as a component of equity, and requires that purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control be accounted for as equity transactions and, upon a loss of control, requires the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, to be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.  SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 with early adoption prohibited.  We do not expect the implementation of SFAS 160 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.In connection with the series of transactions entered into and effectuated with Sharecare (see Note 3), the Company assigned to Sharecare, and Sharecare assumed, the contingent earnout liability of DailyStrength.  Under the terms of the agreements, Sharecare will pay any amounts incurred towards the earnout, up to its maximum amount of $3.5 million.  As Sharecare has assumed full liability for any such earnout that may be owed, the Company has not recorded a liability for the earnout.
 

 
2732

 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

TheWe translate the foreign currency financial statements of our international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates, except revenue and expenses, which are translatedwe translate at average exchange rates during each reporting period.  NetWe accumulate net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of assets and liabilities are accumulated in a separate section of stockholders’ equity titled “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)”.  Generally, our foreign expenses are denominated in the same currency as the associated foreign revenue, and at this stage of our development the exposure to rate changes is minimal.

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivables.  At December 31, 2008,2009, 99% of our cash was denominated in U.S. dollars.  The remaining 1% was denominated in Brazilian Reais, Chinese Renminbi or Hong Kong Dollars.  All our cash is placed with financial institutions we believe are of high credit quality.  Our cash is maintained in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and do not believe our cash is exposed to any significant credit risk.

We do not use financial instruments to hedge our foreign exchange exposure because the effects of the foreign exchange rate fluctuations are not currently significant.  We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes.  We do not use any derivative financial instruments to mitigate any of our currency risks.  The net assets of our foreign operations at December 31, 2008,2009, were approximately $0.5 million.$1,532,923.

We have not entered into long-term agreements or borrowing arrangements with third parties under which any amounts were outstanding during 2008.2009.  Therefore, we do not believe we have any material exposure to market risk changes in interest rates.

We do not use any derivative financial instruments to mitigate any of our currency risks.  We do not currently have any credit facilities and therefore are not subject to interest rate risk.  Due to the nature of our short-term investments and our lack of debt, we have concluded that we face no material market risk exposure.


 
 
2833

 

 
ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3035
3137
3238
3339
3440
3542
73

For supplemental quarterly financial information, see Note 13,17, Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited), of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



 
2934

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of HSW International, Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HSW International, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.  These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.  We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 15, 2010


35



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
HSW International, Inc. and subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of HSW International, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2008, and 2007, and the related consolidated statementsstatement of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the yearsyear then ended.  Our auditsaudit of the basic financial statements included information for the year ended December 31, 2008 in the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the table of contents appearing under Item 15 Schedule II.  These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the information for the year ended December 31, 2008 in the financial statement schedule based on our audits.audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HSW International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the yearsyear then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also in our opinion, the information for the year ended December 31, 2008 in the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 2009
(except for the 10-for-1 reverse split of issued and outstanding common shares discussed in Note 16, as to which the date is April 15, 2010)
 
 
3036

 

HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

 
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
            
Assets
            
            
Current assets            
Cash and cash equivalents
 $18,020,159  $3,476,673  $8,724,546  $18,020,159 
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts
                
of $15,343 and $0 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
 103,020  23,212 
of $0 and $15,343 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively)
  36,377   103,020 
Trade accounts receivable due from affiliates  469,185    
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 1,660,097  942,588   787,972   1,660,097 
Assets held for sale
     19,988,029 
Total current assets
 19,783,276  24,430,502   10,018,080   19,783,276 
                
Property and equipment, net 727,311  293,182   490,306   727,311 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate  4,405,304    
Licenses to operate in China 2,150,000  10,000,000   969,560   2,150,000 
Goodwill 1,972,944        1,972,944 
Intangibles, net  1,676,122   21,476   16,429   1,676,122 
                
Total assets
 $26,309,653  $34,745,160  $15,899,679  $26,309,653 
                
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                
                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable
 $554,673  $537,418  $410,966  $554,673 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 322,094  561,247   686,549   322,094 
Advances from shareholder and affiliate
 83,044  72,927 
Liabilities held for sale
     6,163,131 
Advances from shareholder  85,296   83,044 
Other current liabilities
  57,938    
Total current liabilities
 959,811  7,334,723   1,240,749   959,811 
                
Long-term liabilities        
Deferred tax liability 873,420  2,500,000   242,390   873,420 
                
Commitments and contingencies              
                
Stockholders’ equity                
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
    
Common stock, $.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 53,638,784 issued and
        
outstanding at December 31, 2008, and 49,306,107 issued and 46,306,107 outstanding
        
at December 31, 2007
 53,639  49,306 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
      
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized,­ 5,369,829
        
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009, and 5,363,878 issued and
        
outstanding at December 31, 2008 (a)
  5,369   5,363 
Additional paid-in-capital
 98,606,934  85,980,746   100,435,372   98,655,210 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 (1,126) 112,291   40,100   (1,126)
Retained deficit
 (74,183,025) (52,245,064)
Less: cost of treasury stock, 3,000,000 shares in 2007
     (8,986,842)
Accumulated deficit
  (86,064,301)  (74,183,025)
Total stockholders’ equity
  24,476,422   24,910,437   14,416,540   24,476,422 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $26,309,653  $34,745,160  $15,899,679  $26,309,653 

(a)  All outstanding share amounts have been restated to reflect HSWI’s February 2010 10-for-1 reverse stock split.  See Note 11, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  Years Ended December 31,
  2009 2008
     
Operating revenue    
Digital online publishing
 $196,942 $182,054  
    Social media  194,458  52,090 
    Web platform services from affiliates  1,868,416   
Sales to affiliates
    222,862 
Total revenue
  2,259,816  457,006 
         
Cost of services  2,869,509  987,266 
         
Gross margin  (609,693) (530,260)
         
Operating expenses        
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based
        
compensation expense of $1,780,168 and $4,787,756
        
in 2009 and 2008, respectively)
  10,136,353  15,678,365 
    Gain on sale of DailyStrength  (404,094)  
Impairment loss
  1,180,440  7,850,000 
Depreciation and amortization
  439,088  223,548 
Total operating expenses
  11,351,787  23,751,913 
         
Loss from continuing operations        
   (11,961,480) (24,282,173)
         
Non-operating income        
Interest income
  50,515  515,238 
Other income
  159,146   
Total non-operating income
  209,661  515,238 
         
Loss before income taxes and  (11,751,819) (23,766,935)
equity in loss of equity-method investment        
         
Income tax benefit  688,630  1,962,500 
Equity in loss of equity-method investment, net of taxes  (818,087)  
         
Loss from continuing operations  (11,881,276) (21,804,435)
         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes    (133,526)
         
Net loss $(11,881,276)$(21,937,961)
         
Basic loss per share (a)        
Loss from continuing operations
 $(2.22)$(4.12)
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.03)
Net loss per share
 $(2.22)$(4.15)
         
Basic weighted average shares outstanding (a)  5,361,767  5,294,153 

(a)  All outstanding share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect HSWI’s February 2010 10-for-1 reverse stock split.  See Note 11, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


 
3138

 


HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSSTOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Operating revenue      
Digital online publishing
 $234,144  $147,535 
Sales to affiliates
  222,862    
Total revenue
  457,006   147,535 
         
Cost of services  987,266   1,242,252 
         
Gross margin  (530,260)  (1,094,717)
         
Operating expenses        
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based
        
compensation expense of $4,787,756 and $7,203,738
        
in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
  15,678,365   13,710,723 
Impairment loss
  7,850,000    
Depreciation and amortization
  223,548   57,748 
Total operating expenses
  23,751,913   13,768,471 
         
Loss from continuing operations before other income        
(expense) and income taxes
  (24,282,173)  (14,863,188)
         
Other income (expense)        
Interest income
  515,238   51,754 
Interest expense
     (39,912)
Total other income (expense)
  515,238   11,842 
         
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (23,766,935)  (14,851,346)
         
Deferred income tax benefit  1,962,500    
         
Loss from continuing operations  (21,804,435)  (14,851,346)
         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes  (133,526)  (24,687,959)
         
Net loss $(21,937,961) $(39,539,305)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share        
Loss from continuing operations
 $(0.41) $(1.29)
Loss from discontinued operations
     (2.13)
Net loss per share
 $(0.41) $(3.42)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding  52,941,525   11,544,818 
                 Accumulated     Total 
        Additional        Other     Stockholders’ 
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Treasury  Comprehensive  Accumulated  Equity 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Shares  Amount  Income (Loss)  Deficit  (Deficit) 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2007  4,930,611  $4,931  $86,025,121   (300,000) $(8,986,842) $112,291  $(52,245,064) $24,910,437 
                                 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net loss
                    (21,937,961)  (21,937,961)
Foreign currency translation
                 (113,417)     (113,417)
Total comprehensive loss
                              (22,051,378)
                                 
Shares received from sale of                                
INTAC Legacy Businesses
  —    —    —    (500,000)  (18,400,000)  —    —    (18,400,000)
Issuance of shares to                                
investors, net
  426,881   427   7,842,338   800,000   27,386,842         35,229,607 
Restricted stock grants  6,386   5   (5)                    
Stock-based compensation expense        4,787,756                  4,787,756  
                                 
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2008  5,363,878  $5,363  $98,655,210        $(1,126) $(74,183,025) $24,476,422 
                                 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net loss
                    (11,881,276)  (11,881,276)
Foreign currency translation
                 41,226      41,226 
Total comprehensive loss
                              (11,840,050)
                                 
Restricted stock grants
  8,000   8   (8)               
  Forfeited restricted stock  (2,049)  (2)  2                     
Stock-based compensation expense
  —    —    1,780,168   —    —    —    —    1,780,168 
                                 
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2009  5,369,829  $5,369  $100,435,372     $  $40,100  $(86,064,301) $14,416,540 

All outstanding share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect HSWI’s February 2010 10-for-1 Reverse Split.  See Note 11. “Stockholder’s Equity”.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


 
3239

 


HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

                 Accumulated     Total 
        Additional        Other     Stockholders’ 
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Treasury  Comprehensive  Accumulated  Equity 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Shares  Stock  Income (Loss)  Deficit  (Deficit) 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2006  10  $  $9,810,987     $  $  $(12,705,759) $(2,894,772)
                                 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net loss
                    (39,539,305)  (39,539,305)
Foreign currency translation
                 112,291      112,291 
Total comprehensive loss
                              (39,427,014)
                                 
Issuance of shares to
                                
HowStuffWorks in exchange
                                
for digital publishing rights
  22,940,717   22,941   (22,941)               
Issuance of shares due to
                                
merger with INTAC
  22,940,727   22,941   38,965,425               38,988,366 
Issuance of shares to
                                
investors, net
  3,424,653   3,424   21,036,695               21,040,119 
Stock-based compensation
                                
expense
        7,203,738               7,203,738 
Treasury stock
        8,986,842   (3,000,000)  (8,986,842)         
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2007  49,306,107   49,306   85,980,746   (3,000,000)  (8,986,842)  112,291   (52,245,064)  24,910,437 
                                 
Comprehensive loss:                                
Net loss
                    (21,937,961)  (21,937,961)
Foreign currency translation
                 (113,417)     (113,417)
Total comprehensive loss
                              (22,051,378)
                                 
Shares received from sale of
                                
   INTAC Legacy Businesses           (5,000,000)  (18,400,000)        (18,400,000)
  Issuance of shares to                                
investors, net
  4,268,812   4,269   7,838,496   8,000,000   27,386,842         35,229,607 
Restricted stock grants
  63,865   64   (64)               
Stock-based compensation
                                
expense
        4,787,756               4,787,756 
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2008  53,638,784  $53,639  $98,606,934     $  $(1,126) $(74,183,025) $24,476,422 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(11,881,276) $(21,804,435)
Loss from discontinued operations     (133,526)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization
  439,088   223,548 
Impairment loss
  1,180,440   7,850,000 
        Gain on sale of DailyStrength  (404,094)   
        Web platform services rendered in exchange for reduction in promissory note  (1,000,000)   
         Services rendered in exchange for equity investment in Sharecare  (250,000)   
 Stock-based compensation
  1,780,168   4,787,756 
 Deferred income taxes
  (688,630)  (1,962,500)
         Equity in loss of equity-method investment  818,087    
         Loss on sale of fixed assets  1,117    
 Provision for doubtful accounts
     15,343 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities from continuing operations:
        
Accounts receivable
  113,643   (102,430)
Accounts receivable from affiliate
  (469,185)   
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  872,128   (822,302)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
  280,930   37,744 
Net cash used in continuing operating activities  (9,207,584)  (11,910,802)
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities     (387,904)
Net cash used in operating activities  (9,207,584)  (12,298,706)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of fixed assets and software, net
  (114,213)  (644,546)
Merger related costs recorded to goodwill
     (107,027)
Sale of INTAC Legacy Businesses
     (4,500,000)
DailyStrength, Inc. acquisition
  (15,042)  (3,215,074)
Net cash used in investing activities  (129,255)  (8,466,647)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
     35,229,607 
Cash provided by financing activities     35,229,607 
         
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (9,343,069)  14,464,254 
Impact of currency translation on cash  41,226   (83,926)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period, including $163,158 reclassified to assets held for sale in 2008  18,020,159   3,639,831 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $8,724,546  $18,020,159 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
3340

 

 
HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(continued)
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Cash flows from continuing operating activities:      
Net loss from continuing operations $(21,804,435) $(14,851,346)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash used in        
continuing operating activities:
        
Impairment loss
  7,850,000    
Stock-based compensation
  4,787,756   7,203,738 
Deferred income taxes
  (1,962,500)   
Depreciation and amortization
  223,548   57,748 
Provision for doubtful accounts
  15,343    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities from continuing operations:
        
Accounts receivable
  (102,430)  (23,212)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  (822,302)  (956,169)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
  37,744   1,119,532 
Net cash used in continuing operating activities  (11,777,276)  (7,449,709)
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:        
Net loss from discontinued operations  (133,526)  (24,687,959)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from discontinued operations to net cash used in        
discontinued operating activities:
        
Goodwill write off related to disposition
     22,518,382 
Provision for doubtful accounts
     1,210,631 
Depreciation and amortization
  170,475   280,103 
Gain on sale of businesses
  (343,990)   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities from discontinued operations:
        
Accounts receivable
  31,030   374,694 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  (56,419)  371,712 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
  (189,000)  (5,263,987)
Payable to affiliates
     86,611 
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities  (521,430)  (5,109,813)
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,298,706)  (12,559,522)
         
Cash flows from continuing investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment
  (644,546)  (237,103)
Sale of INTAC Legacy Businesses
  (4,500,000)   
Daily Strength, Inc. acquisition, net of cash received of $76,880
  (3,215,074)   
INTAC merger related costs, net
  (107,027)  (339,892)
Cash used in continuing investing activities  (8,466,647)  (576,995)
Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:        
Purchases of property and equipment
     (25,002)
Cash used in discontinued investing activities     (25,002)
Net cash used in investing activities  (8,466,647)  (601,997)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
  35,229,607   21,040,119 
Proceeds of advance from shareholder
     4,460,529 
Repayment of advance from shareholder
     (8,716,013)
Repayment of affiliated party loan
     (280,320)
Cash provided by financing activities  35,229,607   16,504,315 
         
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  14,464,254   3,342,796 
Impact of currency translation on cash  (83,926)  63,773 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period, including $163,158        
reclassified to assets held for sale
  3,639,831   233,262 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $18,020,159  $3,639,831 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information      
       
Other non-cash financing and investing activities      
Receipt of shares for sale of INTAC Legacy Businesses
 $  $18,400,000 
    Equity investment in Sharecare in return for issuance of promissory note  1,000,000    
    Equity investment in Sharecare in exchange for services rendered  250,000    
    Equity investment in Sharecare, contract for services agreement, license to use Sharecare
    web platform for HSWI's own business, assumption of DS earnout by Sharecare in exchange for DailyStrength assets (see Note 3)
  3,569,298    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(continued)Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information      
Cash paid for taxes
 $  $ 
Cash paid for interest
     56,208 
         
Non-cash business acquisition activities        
Issuance of equity including $100,000 fair value of options assumed
 $  $38,988,366 
Deferred tax liabilities
     4,055,000 
Net liabilities assumed, excluding cash
     3,155,656 
         
Other non-cash financing and investing activities        
Receipt of shares for sale of INTAC Legacy Businesses
 $18,400,000  $ 
Receipt of shares for sale of INTAC distribution companies
     8,986,842 
Issuance of shares for digital publishing rights
     22,941 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35


HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. Dollars)

1.  DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Description of the Business

HSW International, Inc. (“HSWI” or the "Company") is an online publishing company that develops and operates Internet businesses focused on providing consumers in the world’s digital economies with locally relevant, high quality information, and ways to connectprovides web platform services that support traditional web publishing combined with each other.social media.  Our international websites published under the HowStuffWorks brand provide readers in China and Brazil with thousands of articles about how the world around them works, serving as destinations for credible, easy-to-understand reference information.  HSW International is the exclusive licensee in China and Brazil for the digital publication of translated content from HowStuffWorks.com, a subsidiary of Discovery Communications, Inc.,’s HowStuffWorks.com, and in China for the digital publication of translated content from World Book Inc. (“World Book”), publisher of World Book Encyclopedia.  Our DailyStrength brand, which was acquired on November 26, 2008, helps hundredsco-founding and continuing development of thousandsSharecare, Inc. (“Sharecare”) will create a highly searchable social Q&A healthcare platform organizing and answering the questions of readers share informationhealth, in partnership with Harpo Productions, Sony Pictures Television, Discovery Communications, Jeff Arnold, and support on www.dailystrength.org, a comprehensive health-related social media website.  The acquisition of DailyStrength was completed in part to diversify our business and to publish another product which offers insight on highly relevant topics.Dr. Mehmet Oz.  We generate revenue primarily through the sale of online advertising on our websites.websites and through service fees charged to clients for web platform development and operation services.  We were incorporated in Delaware in March 2006.  Our headquarters are located at One Capital City Plaza, 33503280 Peachtree Road, Suite 1600,600, Atlanta, Georgia 30326.30305.

In June 2008, we entered China’s online publishing market utilizing a combination of the contributed assets from HowStuffWorks with the benefit of INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses.  We currently maintain offices in China, Brazil, Los Angeles, California and Atlanta, Georgia, our corporate headquarters.

Prior to the INTAC Merger and related financing transactions, our sole shareholder was HowStuffWorks, a privately-held online publishing company founded in 1999 that provides objective and useful information for people to learn about the world around them and make informed decisions.  On December 17, 2007, HowStuffWorks, our largest shareholder, merged with Discovery Communications, Inc. (“Discovery”) becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discovery.  We reflect an intra-entity liability related to certain transactional costs to HowStuffWorks on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, for approximately $85,000.  As of December 31, 2008,2009, Discovery, through its wholly owned subsidiary HowStuffWorks, owned approximately 42.8%43% of our outstanding common stock.  HowStuffWorks remains based in Atlanta, Georgia.

On October 2, 2007, the date of our merger with INTAC, the following occurred:

·  HowStuffWorks contributed to us inIn exchange for shares of our common stock, HowStuffWorks contributed exclusive digital publishing rights to HowStuffWorks’ content for the countries of China and Brazil, which we translate and localize into the predominant languages of China and Brazil.
·  Our stock became publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HSWI” in connection with our merger with INTAC, with INTAC becoming our wholly owned subsidiary.  We were determined to be the accounting acquirer under the applicable guidance.  At the date of the INTAC Merger, holders of INTAC common stock received one share of our common stock in exchange for each of their shares of INTAC common stock. Prior to the INTAC Merger, INTAC’s common stock was traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “INTN”.
·  Certain investorsInvestors purchased or agreed to purchase shares of our common stock (equity financings) having an aggregate value of approximately $39.4 million of which $22.5 million and $16.9 million (both before expenses) were received in October 2007, and January and February 2008, respectively (see Notes 3 and 10).million.
·  In connection with and as a condition of the INTAC Merger, INTAC sold its wireless handset and prepaid calling cards distribution business (“distribution companies”), to an entity controlled by Wei Zhou, INTAC’s Chief Executive Officer and President, in exchange for 3.0 million300,000 shares of our common stock held by Mr. Zhou. The 3.0 million shares of our common stock were recorded as treasury shares valued at cost as determined by a third party valuation.

On February 29, 2008, based on an increased focus on our Internet based publishing segment, we disposed of all INTAC’s remaining legacy businesses which included services related to wireless telephone training and the development and sale of educational software in China (“INTAC Legacy Businesses”).  Following the disposition the sole asset we retain from the INTAC acquisition is the Internet Licenseslicense to operate in China intangible we are using to enter the Chinese market.market (See Note 8 for a discussion of the valuation of these licenses).  The operations from the INTAC Legacy Businesses will belegacy business have been reflected as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements in subsequent periods.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.statements.


 
3642

 


We entered the Brazilian online publishing market in March 2007, by utilizing royalty-free and exclusively licensed digital content provided by HowStuffWorks.  At December 31, 2008,2009, we had approximately 5,5006,200 articles that were either (i) articles from the HowStuffWorks content database translated from English to Portuguese, or (ii) originally created content.  The web site address is (http://hsw.com.br/).  We are in the early development stage of our business strategy in Brazil as we continue to expand by (i) adding original proprietary digital content designed to meet the information needs of the Brazilian online community, (ii) expanding the amount of translated content from HowStuffWorks, and (iii) refining local marketing strategies.

In June 2008, we entered China’s online publishing market utilizing a combination of the contributed assets from HowStuffWorks with the benefit of INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses.  In September 2008, we announced an exclusive content partnership with World Book, Inc.Book.  In 2009, World Book will createcreated thousands of original Chinese-language articles providing information on all branches of knowledge, including arts, sciences, history, technology, mathematics, sports, and recreation, exclusively for HSW International's Beijing-based website, BoWenWang (http://www.bowenwang.com.cn/).  At December 31, 2008,2009, we had published approximately 4,40011,000 articles.

In November 2008, we acquired Daily Strength,DailyStrength, Inc. (“DS”DailyStrength”), publisher of the health social networking website DailyStrength (http:(http://www.dailystrength.org)www.DailyStrength.org).  DailyStrength was founded in 2006 by internet veterans with more than 20 years of experience conceiving, building, and running communities on the web, including Yahoo Mail, Yahoo Message Boards, Yahoo Groups, GeoCities, Facebook and more.  DailyStrength hosts more than 500 communities focused on issues such as weight loss, divorce, parenting and illnesses.  Users of the site both read and interact with high-quality, accurate reference information.  The site features health journals, discussion forums, virtual hugs, member-created groups, and treatment reviews plus unique content provided on a daily basis by physicians and other health professionals.


2.  ACQUISITION OF INTAC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

On October 2, 2007,30, 2009, the INTAC Merger became effectiveCompany entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with INTAC becoming our wholly owned subsidiary.  The resultsSharecare, Inc. (“Sharecare”).  Sharecare is a  venture among Dr. Mehmet Oz, a leading cardiac surgeon, health expert and host of “The Dr. Oz Show”; HARPO Productions, producer of “The Oprah Winfrey Show”; Discovery Communications, the world's largest non-fiction media company; Jeff Arnold, WebMD founder and Discovery Communications' Chief of Global Digital Strategy; Sony Pictures Television; and HSWI.  Sharecare was founded to build a website that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing all of the INTAC Legacy Businesses havequestions of health and providing multiple answers representing different points of view.  As a result of these transactions, the Company received an equity stake in Sharecare, sold substantially all of the assets of its DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare, agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare, and received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for its own businesses.  Additionally, the Company issued a promissory note for $1 million to Sharecare, all of which has been includedoffset by services the Company provided to Sharecare during 2009, and the note is now paid in discontinued operations infull.  Finally, Sharecare assumed the potential earn-out payment of up to $3.525 million under the merger agreement by which the Company acquired DailyStrength.  We earned the majority of our consolidated financial statements since that date until their dispositionrevenue from the services agreement with Sharecare during 2009.
On February 3, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized a 10-for-1 reverse split of its authorized issued and outstanding common shares, effective for shareholders of record on February 29, 2008 (see Note 3)10, 2010 (the “Reverse Split”)AtThe board of directors believes that the date of the INTAC Merger, holders of INTAC common stock received one shareReverse Split was appropriate in order to maintain continued listing of our common stock in exchange for eachon the NASDAQ Global Market.  NASDAQ requires that if the closing bid price of their shares of INTACour common stock. 

INTAC was acquiredstock is less than $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, the closing bid price must be $1.00 per share or higher for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days during the 180 calendar days following notification by NASDAQ.  Otherwise, NASDAQ would begin procedures to assistdelist our common stock from trading on the NASDAQ Global Market.  The Reverse Split successfully resulted in our primary business focus,common stock achieving the developmentlevel necessary to satisfy the $1.00 minimum bid continued listing requirement, and NASDAQ notified HSWI that we regained compliance with continued listing standards.  However, we cannot predict whether the market price of our digital content database exclusively licensed from HowStuffWorkscommon stock will remain equal to or in excess of $1.00 as the market price is determined by (i) acceleratinginvestors' trades, and may be affected by other factors in addition to the number of shares outstanding, such as our obtaining Internet licenses in China for launching our Internet platform, (ii) obtaining INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies and (iii) providing additional cash flow from its established businesses.

In the INTAC acquisition we also obtained two legacy businesses - services related to wireless telephone trainingfuture performance and the development and sale of educational software delivered to customers in China. However, due to (i) an increased focus of our management and resources on our primary Internet publishing business, (ii) a change of control in our majority ownership leading to further refinement in our strategies, and (iii) an underoverall performance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses subsequentstock markets.

The Reverse Split became effective upon filing a Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on February 16, 2010.  Immediately after the stock split, HSW International had approximately 5,369,785 common shares outstanding.  Immediately prior to the INTAC Merger, we sold these legacy businesses on February 29, 2008 (see Note 3).  FollowingReverse Split the disposition, the sole asset we retained from the INTAC acquisition is the Internet Licenses intangible we used to enter the China market in June 2008.

The purchase price at October 2, 2007 consistedCompany had approximately 53,698,292 shares of the following (dollars in thousands):common stock outstanding.
 
Exchange of 19,940,727 HSWI common shares for all INTAC shares   
outstanding including $100 of fair value for options assumed
 $38,988 
Direct acquisition costs  1,774 
Other  47 
   40,809 
Net liabilities assumed  3,037 
Deferred tax liabilities  4,055 
Total purchase price
 $47,901 

For convenience, we designated October 1, 2007, as the effective date for this acquisition.


 
3743

 


We noted that SFAS 141, “Business Combinations” states that “the fairSubsequent to the Reverse Split, the par value of securities traded in the market is generally more clearly evident than the fair valueper share of the acquired entity” and “that the quoted market price of a security issued to effect a business combination generally should be used to estimate the fair value of an acquired entity after recognizing possible effects of price fluctuations, quantities traded, issues costs and the like.”  However, HSWI as the acquirer was not publicly traded until after the merger with INTAC.  In addition we considered the unique facts and circumstances in the INTAC Merger, including HSWI’s limited historical operations; the transaction being a merger of equals; and lastly, using INTAC’s publiccommon stock price, and determined INTAC’s public stock price was also not a fair value of the equity security because, among other reasons, (i) the public stock price was affected by historical performance of the INTAC distribution business which was sold simultaneously with the Merger, (ii) the INTAC stock was thinly traded and (iii) a majority of the stock was held by insiders.remained unchanged at $0.001 per share.  As a result, we obtained an independent valuation, (using recognized valuation techniques)on the effective date of the Reverse Split, the stated capital on the Company's consolidated balance sheet attributable to common stock was reduced and the additional paid-in capital account was increased by the amount by which the stated capital is reduced.  Per
share net income or loss will be increased because there will be fewer shares of the Company's common stock outstanding.  The Company does not anticipate that there will be any impact to the results of our enterprise value post-merger to determine the fair value of our common stock issued for the INTAC common shares.

The deferred tax liabilities approximating $4.1 million relateoperations, including changes to the non-deductibility (for tax purposes)amount of the acquired intangiblesstock-based compensation expense to be recognized in China.

As part of the acquisition, we assumed 500,000 INTAC outstanding stock options.  The per share fair value of our stock options issued in exchange for all of INTAC’s outstanding options was estimated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model (see Note 10).  All of the options assumed were either already fully vested at the time of the merger or vested in fullany period, as a result of the INTAC Merger.  Therefore,reverse stock split.  Additionally, employee and director share and option grants as well as associated exercise prices were adjusted in the fair value ofsame proportion as the assumed options, $100,000, is treated as part of the purchase price.
Reverse Split.

Liquidity Considerations
The following table summarizesglobal financial downturn continues to have a negative effect on the estimated fair valuesdemand for advertising in general, including online advertising.  Economic uncertainty has had and might continue to have a direct impact on our revenue as orders for online advertising have declined and our typical advertiser is spending less per order than in the prior year.  Also, our businesses in Brazil and China, which we launched in the past several years, are still in an early growth stage as the related websites continue to build towards a critical mass of the assets acquiredtraffic volume.  In consideration of projected market conditions and liabilities assumednear-term revenue expectations, we implemented cost reductions at the dateend of acquisition (dollarsour fourth quarter of 2008 and in thousands).

 $118 
Trade accounts receivable  4,584 
Other current assets  1,683 
Property and equipment  298 
Other assets  90 
Licenses to operate in China (indefinite life)  10,000 
Vendor endorsement in China (indefinite life)  4,400 
Acquired database (5 year life)  1,335 
Acquired software (5 year life)  1,500 
Coursework books (4 year life)  1,035 
Franchise agreements (4 year life)  680 
Goodwill  28,951 
Assets acquired
  54,674 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (9,810)
Deferred tax liabilities  (4,055)
Net assets acquired
 $40,809 
2009 to reduce headcount and better align our costs with our 2009 strategic initiatives which resulted in cost reductions.  We consistently monitor our cash position to make adjustments as we believe necessary to maintain our operational objectives of funding ongoing operations and continuing to make technological investments in our websites and their respective brands.

The purchase price allocation isWe expect to continue to expend significant resources in expanding and gaining market share for our internet platforms in Brazil and China, including additional investments to create or acquire content.  We currently do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures.  Our anticipated investments will be made in the respective markets based on estimatesour success and anticipated market conditions and trends.  We expect that most of these investments will be paid or under commitment before we begin to realize significant revenues.  Additionally, in the fair valuenormal course of business, we continue to explore various business initiatives that may lead to additional sources of revenue and growth.  We believe that our current cash balance and the tangiblecombination of our expected cash generated from future operations combined with recently implemented cost reduction measures will provide sufficient cash to fund operations for at least twelve months.  However, if cash on hand and intangible assets acquiredgenerated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our working capital and liabilities assumed. These estimates were arrived at utilizing recognized valuation techniques with the assistance of an independent valuation firm. Goodwill of approximately $29.0 million resulted primarily from our expectationcapital expenditure requirements, we might implement further cost reduction strategies, or attempt to sell additional equity or obtain financing to fund further development and attain profitability.  There is no assurance that such financing will be available or that we could utilize INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencieswill be able to accelerate the growth ofcomplete financing on satisfactory terms, if at all.

We expect that our Internet platform in China.recently announced service agreement with Sharecare will generate revenues for our company.  However, as discussedSharecare is a newly formed entity and the service agreement expires in Note 3, subsequentJune 2010, there can be no assurance that the amounts generated will be sufficient to December 31, 2007, we decided to dispose of the entire INTAC Legacy Businesses prior tocover our integrating INTAC with our online publishing segment. Accordingly all goodwill at December 31, 2007, along with all other intangibles and net assets acquired exceptliquidity needs for the Internet Licenses intangible was allocated to the INTAC Legacy Businesses in our determination of the appropriate carrying values of our acquired INTAC assets, considering our expected loss on disposition (see Note 3).  Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes in the China.long-term.


The intangible assets, other than the indefinite lived goodwill, Internet licenses, and the vendor endorsement, are being amortized over their useful lives of 4.0 to 5.0 years with a weighted-average amortization period of 4.62 years. We recorded no in-process research and development related to this acquisition.

Following the February 2008 disposition, the sole assets we retained from the INTAC Legacy Businesses were the Internet Licenses intangible asset that has an indefinite life and is not amortized and from which no revenue has been generated from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2008.  Therefore, any pro forma information assuming the acquisition of this remaining asset as of the beginning of the respective periods would provide no additional useful information.

38

In connection with and as a condition of the INTAC Merger, INTAC sold its distribution companies to an entity controlled by Mr. Zhou, in exchange for 3.0 million shares of our common stock held by Mr. Zhou.  The 3.0 million shares of our common stock were recorded as treasury shares valued at cost as determined by a third party valuation for similar reasons that an independent valuation was performed to value the INTAC Merger, as discussed above.


3.2.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – INTAC LEGACY BUSINESSES

Due to an increased focus of our management and resources on our primary Internet publishing business , a change of control in our majority ownership leading to further refinement in our strategies, and an under performance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses after the INTAC Merger, in early 2008 we decided to dispose of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.  The INTAC Legacy Businesses were comprised of two lines of business which were both unrelated to our core Internet platform businesses.

We had originally estimated when deciding to acquire the INTAC Legacy Businesses that, in addition to accelerating our obtaining Internet licenses in China for launching our Internet platform, INTAC would provide us (i) further knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies to accelerate the growth of our Internet platforms in China and (ii) additional cash flow from its established businesses.  Following the underperformance of the INTAC Legacy Businesses in the fourth quarter of 2007, that resulted in short-term negative cash flow from these operations of $1.1 million, and a change-in-control of our business through the acquisition of our largest shareholder, HowStuffWorks, by Discovery, we reconsidered the potential risk of excessive short-term consumption of cash and management resources by our acquired non-core INTAC Legacy Businesses and refined our strategic direction.

We decided that it was critical that all our current resources be fully focused on expanding our Brazilian platform and the June 2008 launch of our Chinese Internet platform.  Although we believe we have benefited in the short-term from INTAC’s relationships and knowledge of the Chinese markets in obtaining our Internet licenses, this refined strategic focus did not allow us the time required to realize the expected long-term synergies, embodied in our acquired INTAC goodwill, from INTAC’s knowledge of the Chinese markets, relationships, and core competencies.  In addition, we were provided with and acted on an opportunity to sell the unrelated INTAC Legacy Businesses for approximately their stand-alone appraised value, and through simultaneous sale of the treasury stock received, generate significant additional cash resources for investing into our core Internet businesses.

On February 15, 2008, we entered into a share purchase agreement to sell the INTAC Legacy Businesses.  On February 29, 2008, we completed the sale of the subsidiaries that comprised the INTAC Legacy Businesses.  These subsidiaries were sold to China Trend Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation that is owned by Mr.Wei Zhou, CEO, director and significant stockholder of INTAC prior to the INTAC Merger in October 2007.  Mr. Zhou was also on our board of directors from October 2007 to December 2007.  In accordance with the Share Purchase Agreementshare purchase agreement with China Trend Holdings, we were to receive 5.0 million500,000 of our common shares owned by Mr. Zhou.  In addition, as a condition to the February 29, 2008, INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition, the INTAC Legacy Businesses were to include $4.5 million in cash at closing.

At the February 29, 2008, INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition, we received only 4.5 million450,000 shares of our common stock from Mr. Zhou and accordingly, we only funded the INTAC Legacy Businesses with $2.7 million in cash.  Mr. Zhou delivered hisan additional 0.5 million50,000 shares of our common stock to us on March 26, 2008, and on March 31, 2008, we released another $1.6 million in cash to the INTAC Legacy Businesses ($1.8 million for the stock received net of an estimated $0.2 million$200,000 withheld for disposition expenses).  As of December 31, 2008, all of HSWI’s assets were in our core Internet businesses, and the sole asset we retained from the INTAC Merger is the Internet Licenses intangible we used to enter the Chinese markets in June 2008.

In the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized a preliminary goodwill write off of approximately $22.5 million related to the February 29, 2008, INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition.  All goodwill resulting from the INTAC acquisition was included with the INTAC Legacy Businesses when we determined the potential write off, because such operations had not been integrated with our online publishing segment prior to our decision to dispose of the INTAC Legacy Businesses.
44

The goodwill write off due to disposition resulted from the fair value of the expected net proceeds of 5.0 million500,000 shares of our common stock, valued at $3.68 per share (less estimated disposal costs) being less than the combined cash to be transferred in the disposition plus the carrying value of the net assets and intangibles sold in the disposition. The disposition proceeds of 5.0 million shares of our common stock, 4.5 million450,000 at closing with an additional 0.5 million50,000 shares delivered to us on March 26, 2008, were recorded to treasury stock at $3.68$36.80 per share based on a Stock Purchase Agreementstock purchase agreement entered into on February 15, 2008, where we agreed to sell and two qualified institutional buyers agreed to purchase 5.0 million500,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $3.68$36.80 per share.

39


As a result of this disposition, the operations of the INTAC Legacy Businesses have been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all the periods presented in our consolidated statements of operations.  The results of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, and 2007 are as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Revenues $38,849  $198,627 
Loss from discontinued operations (before income taxes)  (133,526)  (24,687,959)
Loss from discontinued operations $(133,526) $(24,687,959)
  
At Date of Disposition
February 29, 2008
 
Cash and cash equivalents $ 
Trade accounts and other receivables  2,967 
Prepaid expenses and other  1,451 
Property and equipment  270 
Intangible assets  8,627 
Goodwill  6,540 
Total assets disposed
  19,855 
Accrued liabilities and other  4,909 
Deferred tax liabilities  1,514 
Total liabilities disposed
  6,423 
Net assets disposed before cash transferred to disposed subsidiaries  13,432 
Cash to be transferred to disposed subsidiaries  4,500 
Net assets disposed $17,932 

The following table presents (i) the INTAC Legacy Businesses’ carrying value of the assets and liabilities disposed on February 29, 2008, and (ii) the carrying value of the assets and liabilities at December 31, 2007 that have been reclassified as “held for resale” for the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007:

  At Date of Disposition    
  February 29, 2008  December 31, 2007 
       
Cash and cash equivalents $  $164 
Trade accounts and other receivables  2,967   2,998 
Prepaid expenses and other  1,451   1,401 
Property and equipment  270   291 
Intangible assets  8,627   8,701 
Goodwill  6,540   6,433 
Total assets disposed
  19,855   19,988 
Accrued liabilities and other  4,909   4,633 
Deferred tax liabilities  1,514   1,530 
Total liabilities disposed
  6,423   6,163 
Net assets disposed before cash transferred to disposed subsidiaries  13,432   13,825 
Cash to be transferred to disposed subsidiaries  4,500   4,500 
Net assets disposed $17,932  $18,325 

The estimated goodwill write off due to disposition, based on the expected fair value resulting from disposition was preliminary at December 31, 2007.  Upon final disposition on February 29, 2008, proceeds received of $18.4 million of our common stock (including 500,000 shares received in March 2008) exceeded the net assets carrying value of $17.9 million by $0.5 million partially offset by our estimated disposition costs accrual of $0.1 million, resulting in a net recovery on disposition of $0.4 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.  The recovery primarily resulted from our operation of the disposed subsidiaries at a $0.5 million loss through the disposition date resulting in the carrying value of net assets and liabilities decreasing from normal activities such as depreciation and amortization, disbursements and cash receipts on accounts receivable.  We recorded this net recovery of $0.4 million on disposition in the Loss from Discontinued Operations that partially offset the discontinued operations operating loss of $0.5 million.million as presented in 2008.




3.  TRANSACTIONS WITH SHARECARE

On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with Sharecare, Inc.  (the "Sharecare Transactions"), which was established as a venture among: Dr. Mehmet Oz, a leading cardiac surgeon, health expert and host of “The Dr. Oz Show”; HARPO Productions, producer of “The Oprah Winfrey Show”; Discovery Communications, the world’s largest non-fiction media company; Jeff Arnold, WebMD founder and Discovery Communications’ Chief of Global Digital Strategy; and HSWI.  Sharecare was created to build a web-based platform that simplifies the search for health and wellness information by organizing a vast array of the questions of health and providing multiple answers from experts, organizations, publishers, and caregivers representing various points of view.

As a result of these transactions, the Company:
·  Entered into a subscription agreement for the purchase of 125,000 shares of common stock of Sharecare, representing 20%  ownership of Sharecare at the time of purchase;  
·  Sold substantially all of the assets of its DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare;
·  Agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare; and
·  Received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for HSWI's own businesses. 

Additionally, the Company issued a promissory note for $1 million to Sharecare, all of which has been satisfied by services the Company provided to Sharecare during 2009.  Finally, Sharecare assumed the potential earn-out payment of up to $3.525 million under the merger agreement by which the Company acquired DailyStrength.  

 
4045

 
Upon the sale of DailyStrength to Sharecare, the Company recorded a gain of $404,094, representing the difference in the fair value of consideration received and the carrying amounts of DailyStrength.

The following table details the DailyStrength assets sold to Sharecare on October 30, 2009:

Property and equipment, net $34,616 
Intangibles, net   1,536,096 
Goodwill   1,998,586 
Total assets held for sale $3,569,298 

We account for our equity interest in Sharecare under the equity method of accounting.  Under this method, we record our proportionate share of Sharecare’s net income or loss based on the financial results of Sharecare.   As of December 31, 2009, HSWI owned approximately 19% of the outstanding common stock of Sharecare.
The difference between the carrying amount of our investment balance in Sharecare and our proportionate share of Sharecare's underlying net assets was approximately $3.8 million.  The difference will be characterized as goodwill and is subject to review in accordance with ASC 323 for an other than temporary decline in value.  We eliminated our portion of intercompany profit included in Sharecare's earnings as of December 31, 2009, which was approximately $71,000.  Our investment balance in Sharecare reflects the intercompany profit elimination.

As a result of the issuance of common stock by Sharecare to a third party investor in November 2009, we recorded a change in interest gain of $71,112, which is included in “Equity in loss of equity-method investment, net of tax” on the statement of operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, HSWI recorded revenue of approximately $1.9 million related to services performed under the Sharecare services agreement, a portion of which was used to settle our promissory note to Sharecare.

The following table shows select financial data including HSWI’s proportional share of net loss in Sharecare as reported under the equity method:

  For the Period Ended December 31, 2009 
    
Revenues
 $63,729 
Gross Profit
  (165,549)
Loss from Operations
  (4,336,494)
    Net Loss  (4,329,761)
Loss in Equity Investment, net of tax
 $(818,324)


4.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements from continuing operations include the accounts of (1) HSWI (2)and our subsidiarysubsidiaries (1) HSW Brasil - Tecnologia e Informação Ltda. (“HSW Brazil”), (3)(2) HSW (HK) Inc. Limited, (4)(3) Bonet (Beijing) Technology Limited Liability Company, (5)(4) BoWenWang Technology (Beijing) Limited Liability Company, and (6) Daily Strength, Inc.Company.  The equity of certain of these entities is partially or fully held by citizens of the country of incorporation to comply with local laws and regulations.  The operations

Equity investments in which we exercise significant influence but do not control and are not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method.  In the event of a change in ownership or degree of influence, any gain or loss resulting from an investee share issuance will be recorded in earnings.  Investments in which we are not able to exercise significant influence over the INTAC Legacy Businesses since October 2, 2007,investee
46

are accounted for under the date of the INTAC Merger, through February 29, 2008, the date of INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition are reflected as discontinued operations,cost method.  Controlling interest is determined by majority ownership interest and the assetsability to unilaterally direct or cause the direction of management and liabilities forpolicies of an entity after considering any third-party participatory rights.  The Company applies the year ended December 31, 2007, have been reclassified as “held for sale”.

guidelines set forth in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 810 in evaluating whether it has interests in VIEs (variable interest entity) and in determining whether to consolidate any such entities.  All intercompany balancessignificant inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation.  During

We use qualitative analysis to determine whether or not we are the periods reported,primary beneficiary of a VIE (variable interest entity).  We consider the rights and obligations conveyed by our revenue was derived primarily from advertising revenue fromimplicit and explicit variable interest in each VIE and the relationship of these with the variable interests held by other parties to determine whether our Internet websitevariable interests will absorb a majority of a VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of its expected residual returns, or both.  If we determine that our variable interests will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of its expected residual returns, or both we consolidate the VIE as the primary beneficiary, and if not, we do not consolidate. 

We have determined that Bonet (Beijing) Technology Limited Liability Company is a variable interest entity as defined in Brazil.  Net losses from HSW Brazilthe ASC 810, “Consolidation.”  We are the primary beneficiary of this entity and Chinaaccordingly, we have consolidated the results of this entity along with our other subsidiaries.
We have determined that our interest in Sharecare is not a VIE.  Additionally, we are not the primary beneficiary of this entity.  Accordingly, we use the equity method to account for the years ended December 31, 2008, and 2007, were $3.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively. our investment in Sharecare.

Revenue Recognition Policies

Digital Online Publishing and Social Media Revenue

OnlineWe generally recognize online publishing revenue is generally recognized as visitors are exposed to or react to advertisements on our website.  Revenue is generatedWe generate revenue from advertising in the form of sponsored links and image ads.  This includes both pay-per-performance ads and paid-for-impression advertising.  In the pay-per-performance model, we earn revenue based on the number of clicks associated with such ads; in the paid-for-impression model (sponsorships), revenue is derived from the display of ads.

Web Platform Services
We recognize these revenuesweb platform services revenue at the time services related to the design, development, hosting, and related web services are performed.  We record revenue on a gross versus net basis as we bear the risk of loss related to the services performed, the majority of which relates to services performed by HSWI resources.  Our sole client related to the revenue is Sharecare, a related party.  We are able to recognize all of the revenue generated from this effort when the serviceservices have been provided andsince we meet the other criteria set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, Revenue Recognition have been met;; namely, the fees we charge are fixed or determinable, we and our advertiserscustomers understand the specific nature and terms of the agreed-upon transactions and collectability is reasonably assured.


Cost of Revenues

Online Publishing

The online publishing cost of revenue represents the cost of translating and localizing content and acquiring original articles written by third parties.

LiquiditySocial Media
The social media cost of revenue represents the cost of acquiring original articles written by third parties.

DueWeb Platform Services
The web platform services cost of revenue represents labor cost to design, develop, host, launch and operate the start up natureSharecare websites through our direct activities and management of third party vendors.  Additionally, cost of revenue represents the online publishing segmentcost of HSWI, revenue recorded for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were approximately $457,000 and $148,000, respectively.acquiring content written by third parties as well site hosting costs.

As of December 31, 2008, our cumulative losses were $74.2 million which included non cash expenses of $21.8 million for stock-based compensation, $22.5 million goodwill write-off related to the February 29, 2008 INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition and an impairment charge of $5.9 million, net of tax.  We used a significant amount of the $21.0 million net proceeds from the October 2, 2007, sale of stock in the equity financing to pay transaction costs, to pay off advances from HowStuffWorks, and to fund operations.  In the first quarter of 2008, we received an additional $33.4 million from the sale of our stock.  We believe the proceeds from the sale of our stock in our first quarter of 2008 will provide us sufficient working capital to establish our operations in Brazil, China and the US and provide sufficient working capital for at least the next twelve months.


 
4147

 


Concentration of Credit Risk and Accounts Receivable
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivables.receivable.  At December 31, 2008,2009, 99% of our cash was denominated in U.S. dollars, and 1% represented cash denominated in Brazilian Reais, Chinese Renminbi or Hong Kong dollars.  All our cash is placed with financial institutions we believe are of high credit quality.  Our cash is maintained in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and do not believe our cash is exposed to any significant credit risk.

We believe we are not exposed to a significant concentration of credit or accounts receivable risk.  However, cash  Cash is subject to foreign currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar.  Our risk in foreign currency is somewhat mitigated at this time as U.S. funds are transferred monthly to Brazil and China to fund that month’s operating activity.  If, however, the U.S. dollar is devalued significantly against the Brazilian Reais or the Chinese Renminbi, the cost to further develop our websites in Brazil and China could exceed our original estimates.

The majority of our accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2009, is due from Sharecare.  We regularly evaluate the collectability of trade receivable balances based on a combination of factors such as customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends and changes in customer payment patterns.  If we determine that a customer will be unable to fully meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or other material events impacting its business, we record a specific reserve for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to the amount expected to be recovered.


Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  We maintain our cash in financial institutions we believe are of high credit quality and do not believe any undue risk is associated with our cash balances.  A large portion of the cash balance is maintained at one financial institution.


Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts receivable, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, stock based compensation and income taxes, among other things.


Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to the current year presentation.


Income Taxes

We account for taxes based on guidance in ASC 740.  We recognize income taxes under the asset and liability method.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounts Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  FIN 48 requires a company to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not threshold is met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the financial statements.

In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation 48.  FSP FIN 48-1 amends FIN 48, to provide guidance on how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purposes of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits.  We are required to apply the guidance provided in FSP FIN 48-1, the application of which has not had a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

42

The application of income tax law is inherently complex.  Laws and regulationregulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous.  As such,a result, we are required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures.  Interpretations of, and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time.  As such,a result, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the balance sheets and statements of operations.

We intend to classify interest and penalties arising from unrecognized income tax positions in the statement of operations as general and administrative expenses if they occur.  At December 31, 20082009, and 2007,2008, we had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.  The tax years 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not or have not been under examination but remain open to examination under IRS statute.

The INTAC Merger and the stock transactions in October 2007, more fully discussed in notesNotes 1, 2, 3 and 1011, created an ownership change that may limit our ability to utilize its net operating loss carry forward.


48

Stock Based Compensation

We account for stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires us to recognize expense related to the fair value of ourmeasure stock-based compensation awards.

SFAS 123(R) requiresat the use of a valuation model to calculategrant date based on the calculated fair value of the stock based awards.award.  We have elected to userecognize the Black-Scholes options pricing model to determineexpense over the employee’s requisite service period, generally the vesting period of the award.  We estimate the fair value of stock options onat the datesgrant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with weighted average assumptions for the activity under our stock plans.  Option pricing model input assumptions such as expected term, expected volatility and risk-free interest rate, impact the fair value estimate.  Further, the forfeiture rate impacts the amount of grant, consistentaggregate compensation.  These assumptions are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop.
We do not recognize a deferred tax asset for unrealized tax benefits associated with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensationthe tax deductions in excess of the compensation recorded (excess tax benefit).  We measureapply the “with and without” approach for utilization of tax attributes upon realization of net operating losses in the future.  This method allocates stock-based compensation based onbenefits last among other tax benefits recognized.  In addition, we apply the fair values“direct only” method of all stock-based awards oncalculating the datesamount of grant, and recognize stock-based compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting periods.windfalls or shortfalls.


Foreign Currency

The functional currency of our international subsidiaries is the local currency, Reais in Brazil, Renminbi in China or Hong Kong dollars.  The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars using month-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for revenue, costs and expenses.  Translation gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of stockholders’ equity.  Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.  Both currency translation and transaction losses during 20082009 and 20072008 were not material to our consolidated financial statements.

 
Capitalized Transaction Costs
 
The Company complies with SFAS 141,ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” which requires all internal costs associated with a merger to be expensed as incurred.  SFAS 141ASC 805 also requires companies to expense all incremental costs to outside consultants and other professionals directly associated with the merger. 
Prior to fiscal year 2009, The Company applied the accounting guidance for business combinations which required all internal costs associated with a merger to be expensed as incurred.  The guidance also requires companies to capitalize and include in the purchase accounting all incremental costs to outside consultants and other professionals directly associated with the merger. Accordingly, the Company included $1.7 million of vendor costs, principally legal costs, directly associated with the INTAC Merger, in the INTAC Merger purchase price. (See Note 2).
 
The Company also complies with the requirements of the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 5A — “Expenses of Offering”.  In 2007, we incurred $1.5 million of costs related to the equity financing closed in 2007.  These costs were netted against the proceeds from the transaction and included in additional paid in capital.

Purchase Price Allocations

From time to time, we enter into material business combinations.  In accordance to SFAS 141,ASC 805, Business Combinations, the purchase price is allocated to the various assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair value.  Fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based upon available information and may involve us engaging an independent third party to perform an appraisal of certain tangible and intangible assets.  Estimating fair values can be complex and subject to significant business judgment and most commonly impacts property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including those with indefinite lives.  Generally, we have, if necessary, up to one year from the date of acquisition to obtain all of the information that we have arranged to obtain and that is known to be obtainable to finalize the purchase price allocation.  Until suchthat time, the purchase price allocation may remain subject to change based on final valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and may be subject to material revision.

43


Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation,We compute depreciation, which is recorded within operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations, is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally one to three years for computer equipment and software and three to five years for building improvements and office equipment.  Costs represent the purchase price and any directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to working condition for its intended use.  Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.  Betterments and capital improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset.  We record gains or losses from disposal of property and equipment to operations.

Legal and Auditing Fees

49
Legal and auditing fees are expensed in the period incurred.

Advertising Expenses

We expense advertising costs in the year in which they are incurred.  Advertising expense for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008 was approximately $45,000 and 2007 was $0.2 million.$200,000, respectively.


Commitments and Contingencies

Liabilities
We record liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments and litigation and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.  In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, there are no material claims, assessments and litigation against the Company.Company as of December 31, 2009.
In connection with the Sharecare Transactions, the Company assigned to Sharecare, and Sharecare assumed, the contingent earnout liability of DailyStrength.  Under the terms of the agreements, Sharecare will pay any amounts incurred towards the earnout, up to its maximum amount of $3.5 million.  


Long-Lived Assets Including GoodwillImpairment of Property and Other Intangible AssetsEquipment

We review propertyProperty and equipment and amortizable intangible assetsis tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that thetheir carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Such events include significant adverse changes in the business climate, the impact of significant customer losses, unanticipated current period operating or cash flow losses, forecasted continuing losses or a current expectation that an asset group will be disposed of before the end of its useful life.  Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to future net cash flows the assets are expected to generate.  The carrying valueFor purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, property and equipment are grouped with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the intangible asset is comparedcash flows of other assets.  As of September 30, 2009, and in anticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis on our property and equipment in our social media reportable segment.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  Other than the sale of our DailyStrength assets, no other triggering events occurred at December 31, 2009, that would have caused the Company to believe that the fair value in order to determine if an impairment exists.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of theits property and equipment had declined below its carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.value.

In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Impairment of Definite-Lived Intangible Assets, we test goodwill and indefinite lived

Amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually at December 31, or more frequently ifwhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that this asset may be impaired.  SFAS 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate an asset’sthe carrying valueamount may not be recoverable.  The carrying amount of an asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  We monitor our assets for potential impairment on an ongoing basis.  As of September 30, 2009, and in accordance with SFAS 144, Accountinganticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis on our definite-lived intangible assets in our social media segment.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  In October 2009, we sold the definite-lived intangible assets from our social media segment to Sharecare.  No impairment test was necessary at December 31, 2009.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets Impairment

Generally, we perform our annual assessment for impairment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, unless facts and circumstances require differently.  For goodwill, we determine recoverability by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill applies to the carrying value, including goodwill, of that reporting unit using a discounted cash flow model.  The Company tests its indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are licenses to operate in China, for impairment by utilizing discounted cash flow models to estimate their fair values.  Estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and our long-lived intangible assets involve uncertainties, because management is required to develop numerous assumptions, including assumptions about the future growth and potential volatility in revenues and costs, capital expenditures, industry economic factors and future business strategy.  The variability of the factors that management uses to perform our impairment tests depend on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events and cash flows.  All such factors are interdependent and, therefore, do not change in isolation.  Accordingly, our accounting estimates may materially change from period to period due to changing market factors and other conditions.  Significant judgments in this area involve determining whether a triggering event has occurred, determining the future cash flows for the Impairment or Disposalassets involved and determining the proper discount rate to be applied in determining fair value.  As of Long-Lived Assets.September 30, 2009, and in anticipation of the planned disposition of the DailyStrength assets, we performed an impairment analysis of our goodwill.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  We amortizesubsequently sold the DailyStrength assets to Sharecare and as of December 31, 2009, no goodwill remains and therefore no impairment test was necessary.  We performed an impairment test of our acquiredindefinite-lived intangible assets with definite lives over threeas of September 30, 2009, as a result of the planned disposition of the website trade names related to eleven years.  We recorded anthe Sharecare transaction.  The results indicated no impairment charge was required.  In October 2009, the website trade names were sold to Sharecare.  As a result our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, we recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $5.9$1.2 million net of tax, ofduring the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the licenses to operate in China intangible asset due to the results of the December 31, 2008 impairment analysis.China.  See Note 8.


Taxes Collected from Customers

TaxesWe present taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis in cost of sales in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Net Loss per Share

We compute net loss per share in accordance with SFAS 129,ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings or loss per share (“EPS”).

Basic
50

We compute basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  DilutedWe calculate diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares, if any, outstanding during the period.  Our stock options and warrants were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their effects are anti-dilutive.


 
44



Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006,January 2010, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements.  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles inauthoritative guidance that expands the United States (“GAAP”), and expandsrequired disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157This guidance provides for new disclosures requiring the Company to (i) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements.  This guidance also provides clarification of existing disclosures requiring the Company to (i) determine each class of assets and liabilities based on the nature and risks of the investments rather than by major security type and (ii) for each class of assets and liabilities, disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that incorporates Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) into the Accounting Standards Codification.  The new requirements are effective as of the beginning of an enterprise’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us).  The company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States.  This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  All GAAP references have been updated to comply with the new guidance.

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that revises the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, or VIE, to be more qualitative in nature and requires companies to more frequently reassess whether they must consolidate a VIE.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, for us), for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.  We are currently evaluating the effect of adopting this guidance.

In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that provides additional guidance and disclosure requirements regarding the recognition and measurement of contingent assets acquired and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination where the fair value of the contingent assets and liabilities cannot be determined as of the acquisition date.  This guidance is effective for acquisitions occurring after January 1, 2009.  The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company, and its future impact will be dependent upon the specific terms of future business combinations, if any.

In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for us) with early adoption prohibited.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on net loss per share for any periods presented as share based awards do not contain rights as described in the guidance.
In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that delayed the effective date for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009.  This guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, a fair value measurement would be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for non-financing assets and liabilities.  The adoption of SFAS 157this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as the Company had no financial assets other than cash and accounts receivable.statements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009.  We are currently evaluating the impact FSP 157-2 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

An associated pronouncement, SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, was also effective at the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year.  The Company has elected not to apply the fair value option to measure any of the financial assets and liabilities on its balance sheet not already valued at fair value under other accounting pronouncements.  These other financial assets and liabilities are primarily accounts receivable and accounts payable, which are reported at historical value.  The fair value of these financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value because of their short duration.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations.  SFAS 141(R)authoritative guidance that expands the definition of a business combination and requires the fair value of the purchase price of an acquisition, including the issuance of equity securities, to be determined on the acquisition date.  SFAS 141(R)This guidance also requires that all assets, liabilities, contingent considerations, and contingencies of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date.  In addition, SFAS 141(R)this guidance requires that acquisition costs generally be expensed as

51

incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period impact income tax expense.  SFAS 141(R)This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.  We are currently evaluating theThe adoption of this guidance, did not have an impact SFAS 141(R) will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51.  SFAS 160authoritative guidance that changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be required to be reported as a component of equity, and requires that purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control be accounted for as equity transactions and, upon a loss of control, requires the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, to be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.  SFAS 160This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.  We doThe adoption of this guidance did not expect the implementation of SFAS 160 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


5.  ACQUISITION

OnIn November 26, 2008 the Company acquired 100% of Daily Strength,DailyStrength, Inc., a comprehensive health-related social networking site, for $3.125 million before $167,000 of transaction related expenses.  The Company iswas contingently obligated to pay an earnoutamount of up to an additional $3.525 million based on the achievement of certain page view targets.

Our acquisition  As described in Note 1, we sold substantially all of the assets of DailyStrength, allows usInc. in October 2009 to further leverage our web publishing infrastructure, provides us with an opportunity to diversify our initial focus on the emerging economies, and enter the healthcare digital market.  Maturity within the online healthcare market provides us with additional access to digital revenues and the ability to enter the social networking space with relevant and useful content for individuals who share common concerns. Sharecare.


45



Allocation of Purchase Price

The application of purchase accounting under SFAS 141ASC 805 requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date.  The allocation process requires an analysis of customer relationships, contractual commitments and legal contingencies to identify and record the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  In valuing acquired assets and assumed liabilities, fair values are based on, but are not limited to: future expected cash flows; current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain fixed assets; and appropriate discount rates and growth rates.

Goodwill resulting from the acquisitions discussed belowDailyStrength acquisition was assigned to the Company’s one business segment.DailyStrength reporting unit.  The goodwill and intangible assets acquired are not tax deductible.  The deferred tax liabilities related to finite-lived intangible assets will be reflected as a tax benefit in the consolidated statements of income in proportion to and over the amortization period of the related intangible assets.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (dollars in thousands):acquisition:

Cash and cash equivalents $77  $77,000 
Trade accounts receivable 12   12,000 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 5   5,000 
Property and equipment 30   30,000 
Website trade name (indefinite life) 988   988,000 
Non-compete agreement (3 year life) 354   354,000 
Website features (7 year life) 151   151,000 
Website content (6 year life) 117   117,000 
Member relationships (11 year life) 63   63,000 
Goodwill  1,973   1,973,000 
Assets acquired
 3,770 
Accounts payable and other liabilities (142)
Deferred tax liabilities  (336)
Net assets acquired
 $3,292 
52

Assets acquired
  3,770,000 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (142,000)
Deferred tax liabilities  (336,000)
Net assets acquired
 $3,292,000 

Unaudited pro forma results of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the year ended December 31, 2007 as if HSWI and the entity described aboveDailyStrength had been combined as of January 1, 2007,2008, follow.  The pro forma results include estimates and assumptions whichthat management believes are reasonable.  However, pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost savings or other effects of the planned integration of these entities, and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred if the business combinations had been in effect on the dates indicated, or which may result in the future.

 Unaudited Pro Forma Results of Operations 
    
Unaudited Pro Forma Results
 of Operations
 Years Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2008  2007   2008 
         
Revenue $773,921  $257,369  $773,921 
Loss from continuing operations before other income           
(expense) and income taxes
 (26,107,006) (16,836,833) (26,107,006) 
Net loss (23,752,913) (41,426,337) (23,752,913) 
           
Basic and diluted loss per share (0.45) (3.59) (4.49) 
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 52,941,525  11,544,818   5,294,152 
     
The Company is satisfied that no material change in value has occurred in these acquisitions or other acquisitions since the acquisition dates. The results of all acquired entities have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the respective acquisition dates.
6.  PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

46



6.As of December 31, 2009, and 2008, prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Prepaid content acquisition costs $  $800,000 
Prepaid insurance  510,838   637,012 
Deposits and other current assets  277,134   223,085 
Total $787,972  $1,660,097 


7.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

TheIn accordance with ASC 350 and the planned sale of the DailyStrength assets, the Company performed an impairment analysis on the goodwill balance related to the DailyStrength business as of September 30, 2009.  In performing the impairment assessment, the Company estimated the fair value of its testingsingle reporting unit that had goodwill using the Income Approach (discounted cash flow analysis) — the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) valuation method requires an estimation of future cash flows of an entity and then discounting those cash flows to their present value using an appropriate discount rate.  The discount rate selected reflects the risks inherent in the projected cash flows.  The key inputs and assumptions of the DCF method are the projected cash flows, the terminal value of the entity, and the discount rate.

Based upon the results of the impairment assessment the Company does not believe that its goodwill related to the DailyStrength reporting unit was impaired as of September 30, 2009.  In making the determination that goodwill was not impaired at September 30, 2009, the Company considered both qualitative and quantitative factors.

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to the carrying value of goodwill (figures in thousands):

53



  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
Balance as of January 1:      
Goodwill $31,031  $28,951 
Accumulated Losses  (29,058)  (22,518)
Net Balance $1,973  $6,433 
         
Goodwill acquired during the year        
INTAC     107 
DailyStrength     1,973 
         
         
Goodwill write off due to disposition (see Note 2 and 3)  (1,973)  (6,540)
Accumulated losses      
Balance as of December 31 $  $1,973 


Our Brazil operation has recorded indefinite-lived intangible assets of $16,429 and other intangibles$16,429 as of December 31, 2008.  2009, and 2008, respectively, for website domain names.


54


Intangibles include the following as of December 31, 2009, and as of December 31, 2008:
     As of December 31, 2009 
  Weighted    
  Average    
  Amortization     Accumulated          
  Period (Years)  Gross  Amortization  Disposals  Adjustments  Net 
                   
Intangible assets subject to amortization:                  
Non-compete agreement  3  $353,700  $(98,250) $(255,450) $  $ 
Website features  7    151,574    (18,040)   (133,534)    —    
Website content  6   117,152   (16,270)  (100,882)      
Member relationships  11    63,000    (4,770)   (58,230)      — 
                         
Subtotal       685,426    (137,330)   (548,096)  —     
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:                        
              Website trade name       988,000       (988,000)  —     — 
              Licences related to  China      2,150,000         (1,180,440)  969,560 
              Site domains       16,429             16,429 
                         
Subtotal      3,154,429      (988,000)  (1,180,440)  985,989 
                         
  Total     $3,839,855  $(137,330) $(1,536,096) $(1,180,440) $985,989 
     As of December 31, 2008 
  Weighted    
  Average    
  Amortization     Accumulated          
  Period (Years)  Gross  Amortization  Disposals  Adjustments  Net 
                   
Intangible assets subject to amortization:                  
Non-compete agreement   
  3  $353,700  $(9,825)  $  $  $343,875 
Website features  7   151,574   (1,804)         149,770 
Website content  6   117,152   (1,627)         115,525 
Member relationships  11   63,000   (477)         62,523 
                         
Subtotal      988,000            671,693 
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:                        
              Website trade name      988,000         —    988,000 
              Licences related to  China       10,000,000         (7,850,000)   2,150,000 
              Site domains      16,429    —         16,429 
                         
Subtotal      11,004,429         (7,850,000)   3,154,429 
                         
  Total     $ 11,689,855  $(13,733)  $  $(7,850,000)  $3,826,122 
See Note 3: Sale of DailyStrength Assets


55


8.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 820 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair valuesvalue on a nonrecurring basis.  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.   
ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).  To measure fair value, the Company incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and utilizes market data to the maximum extent possible.  In accordance with ASC 820, measurement of fair value incorporates nonperformance risk (i.e., the risk that an obligation will not be fulfilled).  In measuring fair value, the Company reflects the impact of its own credit risk on its liabilities, as well as any collateral.  The Company also considers the credit standing of its counterparties in measuring the fair value of its assets.
As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
·Level 1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access;
·Level 2 – Inputs, other than the quoted market prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
·Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market data available.
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following tables present losses related to the Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
                Total
            Gains
  Total  Level 1  Level 2 Level 3 /Losses
             
Licenses to operate in China $969,560  $-  $- $969,560$(1,180,440)
As a result of our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, we recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the licenses to operate in China.  We present the impairment charge related to the licenses to operate in China in “impairment loss” in our consolidated statement of operations.  The calculation of the fair value of the Company’s intangible asset was performed consistently with the annual test performed at December 31, 2008, with updated assumptions where appropriate.  The most significant change to the prior year valuation was a downward revision to projected cash flows due to declines in the Company’s projected sales in China from its previous projections.  The Company tests its indefinite-
56

lived intangible assets, were estimated usingwhich are licenses to operate in China, for impairment by utilizing discounted cash flow models to estimate their fair values.  These cash flow models involve several assumptions.  Changes in the expectedCompany’s assumptions could materially impact its fair value estimates.  Assumptions critical to its fair value estimates are: (i) weighted-average cost of capital rates used to derive the present value of future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believes were appropriatefactors used in determining the fair value; (ii) projected annual revenue growth rates used in the models; and (iii) projected long-term growth rates used in the derivation of terminal year values.  The valuation of our China licenses requires us to estimate the period of time a hypothetical market participant, which we define as an internet company wishing to establish a presence in China, would need to obtain our Chinese business licenses.  Other assumptions include estimates of projected capital expenditures, upfront costs incurred to obtain similar licenses, and working capital requirements.  These and other assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future based on period-specific facts and circumstances.  

The following table presents the range of assumptions the Company used to derive its fair value estimates for the China reporting units during the impairment test conducted in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Assumptions
Weighted-average cost of capital27.5%
Long-term growth rates7.0%
Annual revenue growth rates
14.0-127.0 %
Time required to obtain similar licenses9 months 
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to the intangible asset for the licenses to operate in China intangible asset in the amount of $7.9 million during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the slowdown ofstagnant growth internationally and other economic challenges affecting the advertising marketplace in China.  The China intangible asset balance is recorded under the corporate segment.

On November 26, 2008, we acquired DailyStrength and recorded $2.0 million of goodwill and $1.7 million of intangible assets.  The Company performed an impairment test of its goodwill and indefinite life intangible at December 31, 2008 and determined that no impairment existed.

Our Brazil operation has recorded intangible assets of $16,429 and $21,476 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for site domains.

Intangibles include the following as of December 31, 2008:

   Gross  Accumulated  Net Carrying 
 Original Life Carrying Value  Amortization  Value 
           
Website trade nameIndefinite life $988,000  $  $988,000 
Non-compete agreement3 years  353,700   9,825   343,875 
Website features7 years  151,574   1,804   149,770 
Website content6 years  117,152   1,627   115,525 
Member relationships11 years  63,000   477   62,523 
Site domainsIndefinite life  16,429      16,429 
Total  $1,689,855  $13,733  $1,676,122 

The following table summarizes future intangible amortization at December 31, 2008:

  Intangible 
  Amortization 
    
2009 $164,806 
2010  164,806 
2011  154,981 
2012  46,906 
2013  46,906 
Thereafter  93,288 
Total $671,693 


7.  PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following:

  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Prepaid content acquisition costs $800,000  $ 
Prepaid insurance  637,012   788,674 
Deposits and other  223,085   153,914 
Total $1,660,097  $942,588 


47



8.9.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

As of December 31, 20082009, and 2007,2008, property and equipment consisted of the following:

 December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
            
Computer equipment $487,154  $155,909  $512,696  $487,154 
Furniture and fixtures 135,391  95,613   125,523   135,391 
Software 234,927  68,859   258,616   234,927 
Leasehold improvements  102,532   31,616   136,992   102,532 
Total 960,004  351,997   1,038,827   960,004 
Less accumulated depreciation  (232,693)  (58,815)  (543,521)  (232,693)
Property and equipment, net $727,311  $293,182  $490,306  $727,311 

Depreciation expense was $310,828 and $224,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

Approximately 61%59%, 22%26% and 17%15% of our property and equipment, net, are in the U.S., China and Brazil, respectively.


9.
57

10.  INCOME TAXES

We are subject to
The income taxes on income arising in or derived from the tax jurisdictions in which we are domiciled and operate.  Due to net operating losses for book and tax purposes, no U.S. Federal or Foreign current or deferred tax provisions have been made for the year ended December 31, 2007.  We recorded a deferred tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2008 as a resultis comprised of the impairment charge to the China license.following:
       
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
Current:
      
Federal $-  $- 
State  -   - 
Foreign  -   - 
Total  -   - 
Deferred:
        
Federal  (335,920)  - 
State  (57,600  - 
Foreign  (295,110)  (1,962,500)
Total $(688,630 (1,962,500

We have substantial net operating loss carryforwards in some of our companies.  As a result, most of these companies have net deferred tax assets.  We have, however, provided a valuation allowance for all these deferred tax assets based on the uncertainty of generating future taxable income.

The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20082009, and 20072008 differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. income tax rate of 34% to loss before taxes as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Computed “expected” tax expense $(8,076,088) $(13,443,364)
Tax effect of non-deductible goodwill     7,656,250 
Change in valuation allowance  4,807,712   4,349,967 
Tax effect of losses and rates in non-US jurisdictions  523,281   1,515,959 
Tax effect of other permanent items  782,595   (78,812)
  $(1,962,500) $ 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Computed “expected” tax expense $(4,273,768) $(8,076,088)
Equity in loss of equity-method investment  278,150    
Sharecare Stock Acquisition  759,531    
State taxes, net of federal benefit  (1,241,698)   
Change in valuation allowance  3,497,921   4,807,712 
Tax effect of losses and rates in non-US jurisdictions  260,400   523,281 
Tax effect of other permanent items  30,834   782,595 
Total $(688,630) $(1,962,500)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes was comprised of the following:
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Domestic $(10,784,221)  $(20,497,981)
Foreign  (1,785,685)   (3,268,954)
Total $(12,569,906)  $(23,766,935)

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting basis and are reflected as current or non-current depending on the classification of the asset or liability generating the deferred tax.  The deferred tax provision for the periods shown represents the effect of changes in the amounts of temporary differences during those periods.

  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
       
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss carryforwards
 $7,794,786  $3,986,811 
Amortization
  123,703   175,482 
Depreciation of fixed assets
  16,456    
Deferred income and reserves
  67,664   477,266 
Stock-based compensation expense
  7,344,630   5,785,006 
Total deferred tax assets  15,347,239   10,424,565 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Acquired intangibles
  (1,106,465)  (4,030,106)
Foreign exchange gain/loss
  (5,696)   
Depreciation of fixed assets
     (7,340)
Valuation allowance
  (15,108,498)  (10,417,228)
Net deferred tax liability $(873,420) $(4,030,109)
  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss carryforwards
 $11,191,425  $7,794,786 
Amortization
  115,523   123,703 
Depreciation of fixed assets
  24,477   16,456 
 
4858

 
Deferred income and reserves
  101,490   67,664 
Stock-based compensation expense
  8,852,793   7,344,630 
    Less:  Valuation allowance  (19,081,594)  (15,108,498)
Total deferred tax assets  1,204,114   238,741 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Acquired intangibles
  (242,390)  (1,106,465)
Foreign exchange gain/loss
  (6,360)  (5,696)
    Differences related to stock basis in equity investment  (1,197,754)   
Total deferred tax liability  (1,446,504)  (1,112,161)
Net deferred tax liability $(242,390) $(873,420)

 
  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Balance at the beginning of period $15,108,498  $10,417,228 
Increase related to net operating loss and costs and expenses incurred in the current year  2,870,584   3,515,839 
Change related to prior year true-ups  802,754   223,945 
Acquisition of DailyStrength     1,108,654 
Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate differences  299,758   (157,168)
  Balance at end of period $19,081,594   15,108,498 

The net operating losses available at December 31, 2008,2009, to offset future taxable income in the U.S. federal and state, Hong Kong, China and Brazil jurisdictions are $18,279,745, $13,882,854, $142,940, $942,732$25,461,837, $22,252,872, $275,677, $1,727,921 and $4,866,500,$7,243,008, respectively.  The income tax rates for Hong Kong, China and Brazil are 17.5%16.5%, 25% and 15%, respectively.  The net operating losses in the U.S. include losses in the amount of $3.9 million related to the purchase of DailyStrength.  The U.S. net operating losses are subject to certain rules under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limiting their annual usage.  The federal net operating losses expire between the years 2024 and 2028.2029.  The state net operating losses expire between the years 2016 and 2026.2029.  The net operating losses generated in Hong Kong have no expiration date and carry forward indefinitely.  The net operating losses generated in China have a five year carryover period.  The net operating losses generated in Brazil have no expiration date and up to 30% of the net operating loss may be utilized each year.

OnIn assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable losses, we believe it is not more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of these deductible differences as of December 31, 2009. Therefore, a valuation allowance has been provided for substantially all the deferred tax assets.
Effective January 1, 2007, wethe Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48.authoritative guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.  As a result of applying thethese provisions, of FIN 48, we recognizedthere is no increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no increase in accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2007.  We had no unrecognized tax benefits as offor the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.  We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.

We file U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations.  The 2005, 2006 and 20072004 through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities.authorities with respect to net operating losses.  In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 20032007 through 20072008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by their respective tax authorities.



59

10.

11.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

As discussed in Note 1, on October 2, 2007, we completed the INTAC Merger and related transactions affecting our stockholders’ equity as follows:

·  We issued 22,940,7172,294,072 and 22,940,727 million2,294,072 shares of our stock to HowStuffWorks and to INTAC shareholders, respectively.
·  Three millionWe recorded 300,000 shares of common stock were recorded as treasury shares valued at cost $9.0of $9 million.
·  
·  On February 4, 2008, we issued 2,689,464268,946 additional shares to these investors pursuant to an adjustment mechanism provided for in their stock purchase agreement.  The stock purchase agreement with these investors requires shelf registration statements covering the resale of their shares.
·  We entered into a stock purchase agreement with certain investors who agreed to purchase shares of our common stock, conditioned upon the shares being publicly registered.  Such registration was subsequently declared effective on January 14, 2008.  On January 31, 2008, we issued 1,579,348 shares of our stock in exchange for $5.8 million in cash before expenses and, on February 1, 2008, we sold our 3 million treasury shares for $11.0 million in cash before expenses.

We entered into a stock purchase agreement with investors who agreed to purchase shares of our common stock, conditioned upon the shares being publicly registered.  That registration was subsequently declared effective on January 14, 2008.  On January 31, 2008, we issued 157,934 shares of our stock in exchange for $5.8 million in cash before expenses and, on February 29,1, 2008, we sold our 300,000 treasury shares for $11 million in cash before expenses.

In February 2008 we completed the INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition.  In accordance with the share purchase agreement, we were to receive 5.0 million500,000 of our common shares owned by Mr. Zhou and the INTAC Legacy Businesses were to include $4.5 million in cash.  At the February 29, 2008, disposition, we received only 4.5 million450,000 of our shares and we only funded the INTAC Legacy Businesses with $2.7 million in cash (see Note 3)2).  Concurrently, we sold the 4.5 million450,000 shares of common stock to two qualified institutional buyers for $16.6 million in cash before expenses.  Our stock purchase agreement with the investors allows them to request registration of resale of their stock within 180 days of the sale, if they are not able to sell their shares under Rule 144 at that time.

49

We received the additional 0.5 million50,000 shares of our stock from Mr. Zhou on March 26, 2008, and released another $1.8 million in cash to the INTAC Legacy Businesses.  TheWe sold the additional 0.550,000 shares were sold to the institutional buyers for $1.8 million pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement.stock purchase agreement.

In February 2010, we effected a 10-for-1 reverse stock split of HSWI’s common stock (the “Reverse Split”).  As a result of the Reverse Split, each ten shares of HSWI’s common stock issued and outstanding at 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2010, were automatically combined into one share of common stock.  Shareholders received cash in lieu of the issuance of any fractional shares.

Each share of our common stock entitles its holder to one voting right.

Stock Based Compensation

Under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan adopted April 13, 2006 (the “Plan”), HSWI authorized 8,000,000800,000 shares for grant as part of a long term incentive plan to attract, retain and motivate its eligible executives, employees, officers, directors and consultants.  Options to purchase common stock under the Plan have been granted to our officers and employees with an exercise price equal to or more than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.

On August 23, 2006, we completed a stock option grant covering 6,337,500 shares, (“the 2006 Grants”) at an exercise price of $6.50.  Of the 6,337,500 shares subject to the options granted, 2,000,000 vested on the date of grant, 2,000,000 vested on the date of the second anniversary date of the grant date, 600,000 options vest over the period from August 23, 2006 to June 4, 2007, and 1,737,500 vest over three years.

On October 10, 2007, we granted stock options covering 730,00073,000 shares, (“the 2007(the “2007 Grant”) at an exercise price of $7.10$71.00 per share.  Of the 730,00073,000 shares subject to the options granted, 218,88921,888 vested on the date of grant, 319,444 vest31,944 vested monthly over the period from the date of grant through August 23, 2009, 76,667 vest7,666 vested annually over two years endingended August 23, 2009, 40,0004,000 vest annually over the three years ending April 23, 2010, 50,0005,000 vest annually over three years ending October 10, 2010, and 25,0002,500 vest annually over three years ending November 19, 2010.

On March 10, 2008, we granted stock options covering 12,0001,200 shares, at an exercise price of $4.26$42.60 per share.  These options vest annually over three years ending March 10, 2011.

On March 10, 2008, we granted 3,309 shares of restricted stock to four members of the Board of Directors.  The grant date fair value was $42.30 per share.  The restricted stock vested on December 31, 2008.

60

On May 28, 2008, we granted stock options covering 25,0002,500 shares, at an exercise price of $3.80$38.00 per share.  These options vest annually over three years ending May 28, 2011.

On August 12, 2008, we granted stock options covering 125,00012,500 shares, at an exercise price of $3.25$32.50 per share.  Of the 125,00012,500 shares subject to the options granted, 33,4003,340 vested on January 31, 2009, due to achievement of certain performance criteria, 66,6006,660 shares subject to the options granted will not vest due to unattained performance criteria, and 25,0002,500 vest annually over three years ending August 12, 2011.

On August 12, 2008, we granted 3,077 shares of restricted stock to six executives.  The grant date fair value was $32.50 per share.  Of the 3,076 shares of restricted stock, 1,027 vested on January 31, 2009, due to achievement of certain performance criteria and 2,049 shares of restricted stock will not vest due to unattained performance criteria.

On September 22, 2008, we granted stock options covering 350,00035,000 shares, at an exercise price of $3.68$36.80 per share.  These options vestvested on May 31, 2009.

On November 26, 2008, we granted stock option covering 25,0002,500 shares, at an exercise price of $0.37$3.70 per share.  Of the 25,0002,500 shares subject to the options granted, 8,333 vest833 vested on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining shares vest monthly over the two years ending November 26, 2011.  The March 10, 2008, May 28, 2008, August 12, 2008, September 22, 2008, and November 26, 2008, stock option grants are collectively the “2008 Grants”.

On March 10, 2008,25, 2009, we granted 33,0968,000 shares of restricted stock to four members of theour Board of Directors.  The grant date fair value was $4.23$1.80 per share.  The restricted stock8,000 shares vested on December 31, 2008.2009.

On August 12, 2008,November 5, 2009, we granted 30,769stock options covering 63,500 shares at an exercise price of restricted stock to six executives.  The grant date fair value was $3.25$3.90 per share.  OfThese options vest three years from the 30,769 shares of restricted stock, 10,277 vested on January 31, 2009 due to achievement of certain performance criteria and 20,492 shares of restricted stock will not vest due to unattained performance criteria.grant date.

AsOn November 20, 2009, we granted stock options covering 52,000 shares at an exercise price of December 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation expense relating to non-vested restricted stock approximated $6,000 and is expected to be recognized by January 31, 2009.$3.85 per share.  These options vest three years from the grant date.


50



The per share fair value of the stock options granted, estimated on the date of the grant, was $3.37 and $3.78 for the 2006 Grant and  2007 Grant, respectively, and a range of $0.25$2.50 to $2.20$22.00 for the 2008 Grants.Grants and $3.70 for the 2009 Grants, and $1.80 for the 2009 restricted stock grants.  We use the Black-Scholes options pricing model to value our options, using the assumptions in the following table.  Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our stock and of similar entities.  The expected term of options represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding.  We useGiven limited historical evidence regarding the simplified method, or management’s judgment when unable toexpected term of the options issued, we use the simplified method to calculate expected term.  The risk-free rate of periods during the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.  The dividend yield is based on expected dividends to be paid over the term of the options.

 2008 Grants 2007 Grants 2006 Grants
Expected volatility50% – 75% 50% 50%
Expected life in years4.0 – 6.0 6.0 5.6
Dividend yield  
Risk free interest rate2.22% – 3.32% 4.49% 4.83%
2009 Grants2008 Grants
Expected volatility147.5%50% – 75%
Expected life in years74.0 – 6.0
Dividend yield
Risk free interest rate2.90 – 3.06%2.22% – 3.32%

In accordance with SFAS 123(R),ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period.  Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, and 2007, were $4.8$1.8 million and $7.2$4.8 million, respectively.  Unrecognized compensation expense as of December 31, 2008,2009, relating to non-vested stock options approximated $1.7 million$386,000 and is expected to be recognized through 2011.2012.  At December 31, 2008,2009, no options have been exercised under this plan.  Stock options have a maximum term of 10 years from the grant date.

61

A summary of stock option activity and related information as of December 31, 2008,2009, and changes during the year then ended (as adjusted for the Reverse Split) is presented below:

        Weighted    
     Weighted  average    
     average  remaining  Aggregate 
  Number  exercise  contract  Intrinsic 
Options of options  price  term (yrs)  Value 
Outstanding at January 1, 2009  710,345  $63.50   7.6  $250.00 
Granted  106,480   3.90   9.8   —  
Forfeited  (29,166)     —    —  
Exercised        —    —  
Total outstanding at December 31, 2009*  787,659  $55.60   7.1  $ 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009  721,893  $62.32   7.0  $ 
        Weighted    
     Weighted  average    
     average  remaining  Aggregate 
  Number  exercise  contract  intrinsic 
Options of options  price  term (yrs)  value 
Outstanding at January 1, 2008  6,683,056  $6.56         
Granted  537,000   3.44         
Forfeited or expired  (116,600)  4.90         
Exercised              
Total outstanding at December 31, 2008  7,103,456  $6.35   7.6  $250 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008  6,111,389  $6.55   7.7    

*The intrinsic value of these outstanding options is $0.00 due to the exercise price of the options significantly exceeding the present market price of the shares.

The fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, were $2.4 million and 2007, were $8.9 million, and $4.0 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2009, no securities remain for future issuance under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
Restricted Stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2009, is as follows.  A summary of restricted stock activity and related information as of December 31, 2009, and changes during the year then ended (as adjusted for the Reverse Split) is presented below:


     Weighted 
     average 
  Number  grant date 
Shares of shares  fair value 
Unvested balance, December 31, 2008  3,077  $32.50 
Granted  8,000   1.80 
Vested  (9,028)  5.30 
Forfeited  (2,049)  32.50 
Total outstanding at December 31, 2009     

The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2009, was $48,000.
As of December 31, 2009, there was no unrecognized compensation expense relating to non-vested restricted stock.
We assumed 500,00050,000 INTAC stock options as part of the INTAC Merger and exchanged them for an equal amount of HSWI options.  All of these options were either already fully vested at the time of the merger or vested in full as a result of the INTAC Merger.  Therefore, the fair value of the assumed options was treated as part of the purchase price and no related expense was recorded (see Note 2).  The per share fair value of our stock options issued in exchange for all of INTAC’s options was estimated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model, resulting in a $0.04$0.40 to $0.39$3.90 fair value range per option (weighted average fair value options assumed is $0.33)$3.30).  The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions: underlying stock price of $1.95; no dividend yield; expected volatility of 50%; risk-free interest rate of 5.0%; and expected life of seven years.  Subsequent to the merger, 250,00025,000 INTAC stock options expired.  The following table provides a summary of the stock option activity of the remaining options as of December 31, 2008:2009:

        Weighted    
     Weighted  average    
     average  remaining  Aggregate 
  Number  exercise  contract  intrinsic 
Options of options  price  term (yrs)  value 
Outstanding at January 1, 2008  250,000  $5.49   2.8  $409,500 
Forfeited or expired            
Exercised            
Total outstanding at December 31, 2008  250,000  $5.49   4.8  $ 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008  250,000  $5.49   4.8  $ 


In conjunction with the merger, simultaneously with the assumption of the INTAC stock options, and as discussed in Note 2, we issued warrants to purchase 500,00050,000 shares of our common stock to HowStuffWorks on the same terms as the INTAC stock options, with a provision that as the exchanged stock options are forfeited or expire, a similar amount of the warrants expire.  At December 31, 2008,2009, there were 250,00025,000 warrants outstanding.

On May 13, 2008, HSWI entered into a Separation Agreement with the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) in conjunction with the CFO’s desire to retire.  This Agreement provided for the CFO to continue as an employee and officer of HSWI through July 31, 2008, and as a consultant for six months thereafter.  The CFO was paid a lump sum severance payment of $200,000 upon termination as an employee in accordance with his employment contract, and allowed his stock options to remain exercisable for the full 10-year term notwithstanding his termination.  The change in contractual term was accounted for as a modification under SFAS 123(R), which resulted in an additional $43,000 of stock-based compensation expense, which was recognized immediately as the options were fully vested.

On April 3, 2008, the Company extended the stock option term for a member of the Company’s board of directors who was also a former member of INTAC’s board of directors.  The options were extended from a 7-year term to a 10-year term.  The change in contractual term was accounted for as a modification under SFAS 123(R), which resulted in an additional $78,000 of stock-based compensation expense, which was recognized immediately as the options were fully vested.

Earnings per Share12.  EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of our basic and diluted earnings per share computations:

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2008  2007  2009  2008 
Loss per share:            
Loss from continuing operations $(21,804,435) $(14,851,346) $(11,881,276 $(21,804,435)
Loss from discontinued operations  (133,526)  (24,687,959)      (133,526)
Net loss $(21,937,961) $(39,539,305) $(11,881,276) $(21,937,961)
                
Weighted average shares outstanding  52,941,525   11,544,818   5,361,767   5,294,152 
                
Basic and diluted loss per share                
Loss from continuing operations $(0.41) $(1.29) $(2.22 $(4.12)
Loss from discontinued operations     (2.13)     (0.03)
Net loss $(0.41) $(3.42) (2.22 $(4.15)
                
Weighted average shares outstanding 52,941,525  11,544,818   5,361,767   5,294,153 
                
Dilutive stock options            
                
Total common shares and dilutive securities  52,941,525   11,544,818   5,361,767   5,294,153 

Stock options and warrants are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation above as they are anti-dilutive.  The number of anti-dilutive weighted average shares outstanding excluded from the calculation above were 767,836 and 721,239 for the year ended December 31, 2009, and 2008 respectively.

 

52



11.13.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In August 2006, HSW Brazil entered into a 36-month services agreement with Administradora de Bens Capela (“Capela”), a Brazilian corporation, whereby Capela providesprovided sales, business development, and operations personnel to our Brazilian subsidiary.  The terms of the agreement provided to Capela 800,000 stock options at $6.50, the market value on the contract and grant date vesting over the three year contract period.  These options are included in the options described in Note 10.


From time to time, Capela purchasespurchased advertising space on our Brazilian website “Como Tudo Functiona”ComoTudoFunctiona.  The revenue associated with these transactions is classified as “Sales to Affiliates” in the accompanying financial statements.  WeHSW Brazil recognized no revenue during 2009 and approximately $223,000$0.2 million of revenue from affiliates during 2008, no revenue was recognized in 2007 from Capela.2008.

Capela was deemed an affiliate due to an ownership interest in HowStuffWorks, our largest shareholder.  As of December 17, 2007, Capela no longer had an ownership interest in HowStuffWorks.

63

During 2008, the Company had amounts payable to China Trend Holdings Ltd., related to the INTAC Legacy Businesses disposition.  China Trend Holdings Ltd. is owned by Mr. Zhou, CEO, director and significant stockholder of INTAC prior to the INTAC Merger in October 2007.  Mr. Zhou was also on our board of directors from October 2007 to December 2007.  In accordance with the share purchase agreement, disposition expenses related to this transaction were to be split evenly between the Company and China Trend Holdings Ltd.  The Company withheld $200,000 of the purchase price to cover China Trend Holdings Ltd. estimated portion of disposition expenses.  As the Company paid disposition expenses, half of those costs reducereduced the advance from affiliate balance on the consolidated balance sheet.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s disposition payments offset the $200,000 withheld from China Trend Holdings Ltd., therefore, no amount is due China Trend Holdings Ltd.

On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into and effectuated a series of transactions with Sharecare a related party.  As a result of these transactions, the Company received an equity stake in Sharecare, sold substantially all of the assets of its DailyStrength subsidiary to Sharecare, agreed to provide management and website development services to Sharecare, and received a limited license to use the Sharecare web platform for its own businesses.  Through the services agreement, HSWI continues to provide support services to the DailyStrength website.  Additionally, the Company issued a promissory note to Sharecare, all of which was offset by services the Company provided to Sharecare during 2009.  There was no outstanding balance on the note as of October 30, 2009.  Finally, Sharecare assumed the potential earn-out payment of up to $3.525 million under the merger agreement by which the Company acquired DailyStrength.  We entered into each of these transactions simultaneously.

12.Jeff Arnold, a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors, is the Chairman and Chief Architect and a significant stockholder of Sharecare.  Additionally, Discovery Communications, Inc., HSWI’s largest stockholder, is a significant stockholder of Sharecare.  Until December 17, 2009, Bruce Campbell, President of Digital Media and Business Development for Discovery Communications, was a member of HSWI's Board of Directors.  HSWI’s Board of Directors established a Special Committee on May 18, 2009, consisting of three independent directors without any interests in Sharecare to evaluate and recommend the terms of these transactions to the Board.  The Special Committee engaged a third party financial adviser to provide a fairness opinion on the totality of the transactions.  All terms recommended by the Special Committee were unanimously approved by the Board, with Mr. Arnold and Mr. Campbell abstaining from voting.

The Company’s revenue from Sharecare during fiscal year 2009 totaled approximately $1.9 million.  As of March 31, 2010, HSWI owned approximately 18% of the outstanding common stock of Sharecare.  The Company provides web platform services to Sharecare and Sharecare represented 93% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2009.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding payables due to affiliates of approximately $100,000 of which approximately $85,000 was due to Discovery and approximately $15,000 was due to Sharecare.


14.  SEGMENTS

Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.  Because of our integrated business structure, operating costs included in one segment can benefit other segments, and therefore these segments are not designed to measure operating income or loss directly related to the products included in each segment.  Reconciling amounts include adjustments to conform with U.S. GAAP and corporate-level activity not specifically attributed to a segment.  Corporate expenses include, among other items: corporate-level general and administration costs, technology costs and on-going maintenance charges; share-based compensation expense related to stock and stock option grants; depreciation and amortization expense; interest expense and income; and charges related to acquired content not yet published on our sites.

The Company reported two operating segments for the first half of 2009: (1) social media; and (2) digital online publishing.  Our social media segment was comprised of our DailyStrength operations, which generated revenues from the advertisers based primarily in the United States.  We sold substantially all of the assets of the social media segment to a related party, Sharecare, on October 30, 2009.  Subsequently, we no longer recognize activity within that segment.  Our digital online publishing segment consists of our websites in Brazil and China and generates revenues from advertisers based in the respective countries.

64

In October 2009 the Company entered into a Letter Agreement for services with Sharecare pursuant to which the Company agreed to perform services related to the design, development, hosting and related services necessary to launch and operate the Sharecare websites through our direct activities and management of third party vendors.  The operating results for services performed under the Sharecare services agreement are included in the web platform services segment.

Revenue, operating loss and total assets regarding reportable segments are presented in the following tables:


  Digital Online Social Web Platform     
  Publishing Media Services Corporate Total 
            
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009           
 Revenue $196,942  $194,458  $1,868,416  $  $2,259,816 
                     
 Operating (loss) income $(1,784,960) $(1,100,153) $375,000  $(9,451,367) $(11,961,480)
 Interest income  129         50,386   50,515 
 Other income  (854)  160,000      (818,087)  (658,941)
 Income tax benefit     393,520      295,110   688,630 
 (Loss) income from continuing operations  (1,785,685)  (546,633)  375,000   (9,923,958)   $(11,881,276)

  Digital Online Social Web Platform     
  Publishing Media Services Corporate Total 
            
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2008           
 Revenue $404,916  $52,090  $  $  $457,006 
                     
 Operating (loss) income $(3,269,594) $(19,193) $  $(20,993,385) $(24,282,172)
 Interest income  639         514,599   515,238 
 Income tax benefit              1,962,500   1,962,500 
 (Loss) income from continuing operations  (3,268,955)  (19,193     (18,516,286 $(21,804,434)

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Total assets:      
Web platform services $469,185  $ 
Social media  19,751   3,732,855 
Digital online publishing  563,363   731,371 
 Business segments  1,052,299    4,464,226 
Corporate  14,853,610   21,845,427 
 Total assets $15,905,909  $26,309,653 

65


  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Total investment in unconsolidated entities:      
Web platform services $  $ 
Social media      
Digital online publishing      
 Business segments      
Corporate  4,405,304    
 Total investment in unconsolidated entities $4,405,304  $ 

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Total equity in income of unconsolidated entities:      
Web platform services      
Social media $  $ 
Digital online publishing      
 Business segments      
Corporate  (818,087)    
 Total equity in income of unconsolidated entities $(818,087)  $ 

In the table below is a summary of select financial information by country in which the Company has operations.
  
 
2009
 2008
Revenues:          
United States  $2,062,874   $52,090 
Brazil   177,900   404,916 
China   19,042    - 
Total revenues  $2,259,816   $457,006 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Long-lived assets:      
United States $1,256,879  $4,078,907 
Brazil  151,604   137,370 
China  74,043   2,310,098 
Total long-lived assets $1,482,526  $6,526,375 

15.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

We have entered into operating leases for office space.  Rental expense for operating leases, which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, was $444,933$466,861 and $144,763$444,933 for years ended December 31, 20082009, and 2007,2008, respectively.  We have not entered into any capital leases.

The following table summarizes the approximate future minimum rentalsrental payments under noncancelablenon-cancelable operating leases and other commitments in effect at December 31, 2008:

  Minimum Commitments 
    
2009 $1,172,506 
2010  92,933 
2011   
2012   
2013   
Thereafter   
Total $1,265,439 

Savings Plan

We sponsor a defined contribution plan to help eligible employees provide for retirement.  All contributions to the plan are made by employees.  Currently, there are no Company-funded contributions to the plan on behalf of employees.2009:
 

 
5366

 


13.  QUARTERLY
  Operating Lease Commitments 
    
2010 $266,907 
2011  168,769 
2012  35,928 
2013   
2014   
Thereafter   
Total $471,604 


16.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 3, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized a 10-for-1 reverse split of its authorized, issued and outstanding common shares (the “Reverse Split”), effective for shareholders of record on February 10, 2010.

The board authorized the Reverse Split with the intent of maintaining the Company's listing on the NASDAQ Global Market.  The Reverse Split was effective upon filing a Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.  Immediately after the Reverse Split, HSW International had approximately 5,369,785 common shares outstanding.  Immediately prior to the Reverse Split, the Company had approximately 53,698,292 shares of common stock outstanding.

Subsequent to the Reverse Split, the par value per share of the common stock remained unchanged at $0.001 per share.  As a result, on the effective date of the Reverse Split, the stated capital on the Company's consolidated balance sheets attributable to common stock was reduced and the additional paid-in capital account was increased by the amount by which the stated capital is reduced.  Per share net income or loss will be increased because there are fewer shares of the Company's common stock outstanding.  The Company does not anticipate that any other accounting consequences, including changes to the amount of stock-based compensation expense to be recognized in any period, will arise as a result of the Reverse Split.  Additionally, we adjusted employee and director share and option grants proportionately as well as the associated exercise prices.

On March 30, 2010, the Company entered into a 24-month sublease agreement with Sharecare, a related party, for rental of our Corporate headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia.  Effective March 1, 2010, aggregate rental payments under the sublease agreement total $487,890 over the next 24 months.  The lease provides an option to decrease rentable square footage that, if exercised, results in minimum rental payments due to Sharecare over the next 24 months of $243,945.  

On March 30, 2010, the Company received a notice from the NASDAQ Stock Market indicating that it no longer complies with the requirements of NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5450(b)(1)(C) for continued listing on The NASDAQ Global Market.  The rule requires that the publicly held shares of the Company, which is calculated by subtracting all shares held by officers, directors or beneficial owners of 10% or more of the total shares outstanding, maintain a minimum market value of $5,000,000.

The Company has 180 calendar days, or until September 27, 2010, in which to regain compliance with the listing requirement by having the market value of its publicly held shares close at $5,000,000 or more for ten consecutive business days.  If the Company does not regain compliance prior to the expiration of the 180-day grace period, NASDAQ will provide written notice that the Company’s common stock is subject to delisting.  Alternatively, the Company may transfer its listing to The NASDAQ Capital Market, provided that it satisfies the requirements for continued listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.


17.QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2008.2009.

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2008  June 30, 2008  September 30, 2008  December 31, 2008 
             
Revenue $44,837  $127,989  $116,236  $167,944 
Operating expenses  (4,899,539)  (4,536,560)  (4,274,198)  (11,028,882)
Loss from operations  (4,854,702)  (4,408,571)  (4,157,962)  (10,860,938)
Other income (expense)  91,907   165,352   150,454   107,525 
Deferred income tax benefit           1,962,500 
Loss from discontinued operations  (133,526)         
Net loss $(4,896,321) $(4,243,219) $(4,007,508) $(8,790,913)
                 
Net loss per basic and diluted share $(0.09) $(0.08) $(0.07) $(0.16)
                 
Basic and diluted weighted average                
shares outstanding
  51,027,422   53,574,919   53,574,919   53,574,919 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2007  June 30, 2007  September 30, 2007  December 31, 2007 
             
Revenue $  $32,674  $60,288  $54,573 
Operating expenses  (2,886,785)  (3,310,958)  (3,473,872)  (5,339,108)
Loss from operations  (2,886,785)  (3,278,284)  (3,413,584)  (5,284,535)
Other income (expense)     (19,871)  (11,156)  42,869 
Loss from discontinued operations           (24,687,959)
Net loss $(2,886,785) $(3,298,155) $(3,424,740) $(29,929,625)
                 
Net loss per basic and diluted share $(288,678) $(329,816) $(342,474) $(0.65)
                 
Basic and diluted weighted average                
shares outstanding
  10   10   10   45,802,780 
 

 
5467

                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Three Months Ended
  
 
March 31, 2009
  
 
June 30, 2009
  September 30, 2009  December 31, 2009 
             
Revenue $126,330  $88,154  $91,067  $1,954,265 
Operating expenses  (3,537,947)  (3,480,443)  (3,230,176)  (3,974,433)
Loss from operations  (3,411,617)  (3,392,289)  (3,139,109)  (2,020,168)
Other income (expense)  175,492   16,258   11,160   (810,481)
Deferred income tax benefit        393,520   295,110 
Loss from discontinued operations            
Net loss $(3,236,125) $(3,376,031) $(2,734,429) $(2,535,539)
                 
Net loss per basic share $(0.60) $(0.63) $(0.51) $(0.47)
                 
Basic weighted average                
shares outstanding
  5,361,486   5,361,829   5,361,829   5,361,916 

                                                                                                                                                                            Three Months Ended
  March 31, 2008  June 30, 2008  September 30, 2008  December 31, 2008 
             
Revenue $44,837  $127,989  $116,236  $167,944 
Operating expenses  (4,899,539)  (4,536,560)  (4,274,198)  (11,028,882)
Loss from operations  (4,854,702)  (4,408,571)  (4,157,962)  (10,860,938)
Other income (expense)  91,907   165,352   150,454   107,525 
Deferred income tax benefit           1,962,500 
Loss from discontinued operations  (133,526)         
Net loss $(4,896,321) $(4,243,219) $(4,007,508) $(8,790,913)
                 
Net loss per basic share $(0.96) $(0.79) $(0.75) $(1.64)
                 
Basic weighted average                
shares outstanding
  5,102,742   5,357,491   5,357,491   5,357,491 


Our revenue increased from the third quarter to the fourth quarter in 2009 by 2,045% due to the services agreement entered into on October 30, 2009, with Sharecare to design, build and manage the web platform for the soon to be launched website(s).

68

 

 
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE



ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the management, including our Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and the Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.  The Company’s management, including the Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls can prevent all errors and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  There are inherent limitations in all control systems, including the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of one or more persons.  The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and, while our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to be effective under circumstances where they should reasonably be expected to operate effectively, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Because of the inherent limitations in any control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.





ITEM 9B.9B.  OTHER INFORMATION



(a)The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on December 17, 2009.
The following table shows the results of voting:
 
5569

 

 
     
Matter
Voted Upon
  
Shares
Voted For
  Authority Withheld
Election of Directors:      
Jeffrey T. Arnold  32,907,178  6,600
Theodore P. Botts  32,913,778  
Boland T. Jones  32,857,280  56,498
Arthur F. Kingsbury  32,913,778  
Kai-Shing Tao  32,913,778  
Scott V. Booth  32,913,778  
Michael J. Cascone  32,908,678  5,100
Gregory M. Swayne  32,913,778  
         
Matter
Voted Upon
  
Shares
Voted For
  
Shares Voted
Against
  Abstained  
Broker
Non-Votes
Approval of proposal to authorize the Board of Directors to implement, in its discretion, a reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock  32,852,365  61,413    
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  32,890,765  22,888    
NASDAQ Notice

On March 30, 2010, the Company received a notice from the NASDAQ Stock Market indicating that it no longer complies with the requirements of NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5450(b)(1)(C) for continued listing on The NASDAQ Global Market.  The rule requires that the publicly held shares of the Company, which is calculated by subtracting all shares held by officers, directors or beneficial owners of 10% or more of the total shares outstanding, maintain a minimum market value of $5,000,000.

The Company has 180 calendar days, or until September 27, 2010, in which to regain compliance with the listing requirement by having the market value of its publicly held shares close at $5,000,000 or more for ten consecutive business days.  If the Company does not regain compliance prior to the expiration of the 180-day grace period, NASDAQ will provide written notice that the Company’s common stock is subject to delisting.  Alternatively, the Company may transfer its listing to The NASDAQ Capital Market, provided that it satisfies the requirements for continued listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.
HSW International directors Jeffrey T. Arnold and Boland T. Jones each notified the Company’s board of directors that they do not wish to stand for reelection as directors at the Company's next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  Mr. Arnold notified the Company that he is not standing for reelection due to his new role as chairman and chief architect of Sharecare, a related party to the Company.  Neither Mr. Arnold nor Mr. Jones declined to stand for reelection as a result of any dispute, claim or issue with the Company.  The board of directors of HSW International does not intend to nominate any additional directors to fill these seats at the next Annual Meeting, and intends to commence the board’s next term with six directors.

70


PART III

ITEM 10.10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE



NameAgePosition with HSWI
Jeffrey T. Arnold
March 14, 200639Chairman of the Board of Directors
Henry N. Adorno
October 2, 200761Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Theodore P. Botts
October 2, 200763Director
Bruce L. Campbell
December 14, 200741Director
Boland T. Jones
October 2, 200749Director
Arthur F. Kingsbury
December 14, 200760Director
Kai-Shing Tao
October 2, 200732Director

Jeffrey T. Arnold, age 39, has served as a member and Chairman of HSWI’s Board of Directors since 2006. Mr. Arnold served as the president and chief executive officer of HSWI until October 2, 2007.  Mr. Arnold has a proven track record in creating successful business enterprises. Mr. Arnold’s most recent venture was The Convex Group, which included HowStuffWorks, Inc. and was acquired by Discovery Communications, Inc., or Discovery, in December 2007. Prior to starting The Convex Group, Mr. Arnold was founder and CEO of WebMD, an ehealthcare company seeking to transform healthcare into a more accessible, efficient and innovative system utilizing the Internet. Between August 1998 and September 2000, Mr. Arnold negotiated over ten acquisitions, growing WebMD from 60 people and $75,000 in annual revenues to over 5,000 people and 2001 revenues of close to $1 billion. Additionally, at WebMD Mr. Arnold raised over $1.5 billion in public and private capital in a 12 month period, negotiated over 100 strategic partnerships with both established Fortune 500 and emerging companies and established a strong operational management team. Prior to founding WebMD, Mr. Arnold was chairman and CEO of Quality Diagnostic Services (QDS), a cardiac arrhythmia monitoring company, which he founded in 1994. After growing QDS to one of the nation’s largest cardiac-event monitoring companies, he sold QDS to Matria Healthcare for $25 million in 1998. In 1997, Mr. Arnold started Endeavor Technologies, Inc. to explore enhanced applications for Internet and computer telephony services. Endeavor, with the proceeds from the sale of QDS, became WebMD in August 1998.


56


Henry N. Adorno, age 61, has served as a member and Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors since 2007.  Mr. Adorno is also the founder and President of Adorno & Yoss, the largest certified minority-owned law firm in the country, with over 270 practicing attorneys. Mr. Adorno began his career working with the Dade County Attorney’s Office in the Major Crimes Division.  He later served as the Chief Assistant to State Attorney Janet Reno.  Beyond his professional responsibilities, Mr. Adorno is the Chair of Our Kids, a non-profit organization which utilizes community outreach to manage child welfare and protection for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.  Mr. Adorno holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Juris Doctor, both from the University of Florida. Mr. Adorno is a member of the American Bar Association, The Florida Bar Association, and the Miami Business Forum.

Theodore P. Botts, age 63, has served as a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors since 2007. He is also President of Kensington Gate Capital, LLC, a private corporate finance advisory firm. Since 2002 until its merger with HSW International, Mr. Botts served on INTAC International’s board of directors as chairman of the audit committee. Prior to 2000, Mr. Botts served in executive capacities at UBS Group and Goldman Sachs. Mr. Botts is also a member the Board of Trustees and head of development for REACH Prep, a non-profit organization serving the educational needs of underprivileged African-American and Latino children in Fairfield and Westchester counties since 2003. Mr. Botts graduated with honors from Williams College and received a MBA from the NYU Graduate School of Business Administration.

Bruce L. Campbell, age 41, has served as a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors since 2007. He is currently President of Digital Media and Corporate Development at Discovery, where he directs worldwide business development, including acquisitions, joint ventures and all major business transactions. His responsibilities include the development of new distribution platforms for original content, the creation of digital media extensions for Discovery’s stable of brands and oversight of digital media services. Before joining Discovery in 2007, Mr. Campbell was Executive Vice President, Business Development at NBC Universal, where he was responsible for strategic planning, acquisitions and divestitures, joint ventures and portfolio investments. Prior to his time at NBC, Mr. Campbell was a lawyer at O’Melveny & Myers LLP. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School.
Boland T. Jones, age 49, has served as a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors since 2007. He is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Premiere Global Services, Inc. Prior to founding Premiere Global Services, Inc. in 1991, Mr. Jones served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of American Network Exchange, a diversified transmission provider specializing in niche markets. Mr. Jones has received numerous awards during his career, including being named Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Southeast Region. Mr. Jones is also actively involved in a number of community programs in education, cancer research and the arts. Mr. Jones graduated with a degree in finance from Miami University in Ohio, where he remains active as a guest lecturer and teacher at the University’s Entrepreneurship Resource Center.
Arthur F. Kingsbury, age 60, has served as a member of HSWI’s Board of Directors since 2007. He is currently a private investor. Mr. Kingsbury has over thirty-five years of business and financial experience in the media and communications sectors. His experience includes financial, senior executive and director positions at companies engaged in newspaper publishing, radio broadcasting, database publishing, internet research, cable television and cellular telephone communications. Specific positions included President and COO of VNU-USA, Inc., Vice Chairman and COO of BPI Communications, Inc., and CFO of Affiliated Publications, Inc. Mr. Kingsbury has served as a director on the boards of three other publicly traded companies, NetRatings (NASDAQ), Affiliated Publications (NYSE-listed publisher of the Boston Globe), and McCaw Cellular (NASDAQ). Mr. Kingsbury holds a BSBA in Business Administration from Babson College.


57



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
The following table sets certainresponse to Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information about eachto be set forth in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of our executive officers and other key employees as of MarchStockholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 30, 2009.
NameAgePosition
Executive Officers
Henry N. Adorno61Vice Chairman and Principal Executive Officer
Gregory M. Swayne50President and Chief Operating Officer
Shawn G. Meredith39Chief Financial Officer
Other Key Employees
Alexandre de Freitas40Chief Executive Officer, HSW Brasil
Douglas J. Hirsch38Senior Vice President, DailyStrength
Eric J. Orme34Chief Technology Officer
Bradley T. Zimmer30Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Executive Officers2010.

Henry N. Adorno has been Vice Chairman of HSW International, Inc.’s Board of Directors and our Principal Executive Officer since October 2007.  Mr. Adorno is also the founder and President of Adorno & Yoss, the largest certified minority-owned law firm in the country, with over 270 practicing attorneys.  Mr. Adorno began his career working with the Dade County Attorney’s Office in the Major Crimes Division.  He later served as the Chief Assistant to State Attorney Janet Reno.  Beyond his professional responsibilities, Mr. Adorno is the Chair of Our Kids, a non-profit organization which utilizes community outreach to manage child welfare and protection for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.  Mr. Adorno holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Juris Doctor, both from the University of Florida. Mr. Adorno is a member of the American Bar Association, The Florida Bar Association and the Miami Business Forum.
Gregory M. Swayne has been our President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2007.  Mr. Swayne was previously the President and Chief Operating Officer of HowStuffWorks, Inc., following its purchase by The Convex Group in 2002. Mr. Swayne joined The Convex Group in 2001, and was part of the management team of N2 Broadband, one of Convex’s first investments.  Prior to Convex, Mr. Swayne was the co-founder and President of publicly-listed A.D.A.M., Inc. and its predecessor Medical Legal Illustrations, Inc. A.D.A.M. provides health information services and benefit management solutions to healthcare organizations, employers, benefit brokers, consumers and the educational market through its online offerings of health information, decision-support applications, benefits management solutions and enrollment services.  Mr. Swayne holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of South Carolina and a Master of Science in Medical Illustration from the Medical College of Georgia.


58



Other Key Employees

Alexandre de Freitas has been our Chief Executive Officer, HSW Brasil since October 2006.  Mr. de Freitas started his career at Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) in Brazil and rose to the position of senior manager.  He moved to be the marketing director at ABN-AMRO Bank (NYSE: ABN) to develop a new marketing strategy focused on business expansion in Brazil.  During the last ten years he was the Marketing and Sales Executive Vice President of UOL, the leading online media portal and Internet company in Brazil.  Mr. de Freitas holds bachelor degrees in Business Administration from University of São Paulo and Information Technology from Mackenzie University, and is specialized in Marketing from FGV Institute.

Douglas J. Hirsch has been our Senior Vice President, DailyStrength since we acquired it.  He founded DailyStrength in 2006, and has more than 12 years of experience conceiving, building and managing the biggest community and entertainment sites on the Web.  As one of the first employees of Yahoo Inc., he conceived and/or managed product development for all of Yahoo's community and communication products.  Between 1996 and 2001, Mr. Hirsch led product development for services which generated more than 75% of Yahoo's traffic and virtually all registrations.  After leaving Yahoo to travel around the world in 2001, Mr. Hirsch returned to Yahoo as the General Manager of Yahoo! Entertainment.  In August 2005, Mr. Hirsch joined Facebook, Inc., as the Vice President of Production.  During his tenure at Facebook, Mr. Hirsch conceived, managed and launched Facebook's photo sharing product and Facebook's high school product.  Mr. Hirsch is a magna cum laude graduate of Tufts University, with additional coursework at Oxford University and UCLA.

Eric J. Orme has been our Chief Technology Officer since November 2007.  Mr. Orme has been involved in information technology leadership in the web hosting, education technology, and online media markets for the past fifteen years.  His technical background includes work for both start-ups and larger global corporations, including Georgia-Pacific, web.com, and Ashworth University.  Mr. Orme has been central in orchestrating the launch of the online media company into China and Brazil.

Bradley T. Zimmer has been Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for HSW International, Inc. since December 2007.  He previously served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of The Convex Group, an entertainment and media company, and its subsidiary HowStuffWorks, Inc. through the companies' acquisition by Discovery Communications, Inc. in December 2007.  Prior to The Convex Group, Mr. Zimmer was responsible for business strategy at Southeast Interactive Technology Funds, a venture capital firm focused on information technology and communications investments.  Mr. Zimmer holds Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy and Juris Doctor degrees from Duke University. He is a member of the American Bar Association and North Carolina State Bar, and is a member of the boards of directors of Mobil Travel Guide and Flexplay Technologies.

59

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Audit Committee






·  Discovery Communications, Inc.’s initial report on Form 3 was due on January 2, 2008 and was filed on January 4, 2008;
·  Eastern Advisors Capital Group LLC’s initial report on Form 3 was due on March 14, 2008 and was filed on March 26, 2008, and its Form 4 reporting purchases of an aggregate of 521,000 shares of our Common Stock on March 20, 2008 was due on March 24, 2008 and filed on March 31, 2008;
·  Gregory M. Swayne’s initial report on Form 3 was due on October 15, 2007 and his Form 4 reporting the grant of 100,000 stock options on October 10, 2007 was due on October 12, 2007, both of which were filed in April 2008; and
·  Henry N. Adorno’s Form 4 reporting the grant of 250,000 stock options on October 10, 2007 was due October 12, 2007 and was filed in April 2008.


ITEM 11.11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION










61



Elements of Total Compensation

Components of our executive compensation are as follows:

Base Salary Base salary for our executives is determined based on the specific level and experience of the executive and responsibilities of a position. Generally, the goal is to achieve a salary that is competitive with the salary for similar positions in similar industries within our Company’s geographic region. Salaries are reviewed during the annual review process when an increase, if any, is determined. Any increase in salary for the named executive officers is subject to Compensation Committee approval. In addition, base salaries may be adjusted, on occasion at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, to realign a particular salary or salaries with current market conditions.  Prior to his relocation to Atlanta in 2008, we paid Mr. Adorno an annual salary of $225,000 and a living expense allowance of $180,000 per year.  Upon his move, we eliminated the living expense allowance and increased his base salary by $180,000.

Incentive Bonus We use bonuses to provide an added incentive to meet additional objectives which exceed ordinary expectations. For 2008, the target bonuses were based on certain stretch goals reflecting operational and financial key performance indicators of our Company.

On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Executive Compensation Plan (“Plan”).  The purpose of the Plan was to promote the interests of our company by motivating our key employees to execute upon and achieve our business plan and to retain key employees.
 
The Plan established a bonus pool consisting of an aggregate of 30,769 restricted shares of our common stock, 100,000 optionsresponse to acquire shares of our common stock and $100,000, whichItem 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information to be used as a tax offsetset forth in the Proxy Statement for the equity portionAnnual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Plan.  The shares of restricted stock and shares issuable under the options granted under the Plan will be issued out of the shares available under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.  Six key employees participated in the Plan, including our Vice Chairman, Henry Adorno, our President and Chief Operating Officer, Gregory Swayne, and our Chief Financial Officer, Shawn Meredith.
The performance criteria are tied to foreign website development, activity and revenue during 2008. Each criterion achieved caused 33.4%, 33.3% and 33.3%, respectively, of the bonus pool to vest. As only the foreign website development criteria was met during 2008, only 33.4% of the bonus pool vested and was paid to the key employees.
Long-term Equity Incentive Awards Granting stock options encourages our executives to focus on our Company’s future success. The Company issues grants for stock options under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan adoptedCommission not later than April 31, 2006.  The number of grants recipients receive is generally based on their particular position within the Company.  All grants require the approval of the Compensation Committee of our Board.  In the event of a change in control in HSW International, any unvested options held by each of our named executive officers will fully vest on the date of the change of control.

Payments in Connection with a Change of Control or Termination

We provided protection to Mr. Darnell by including severance provisions in his employment agreement.  Severance payments will only be paid in the event that we terminate Mr. Darnell without cause as defined in his employment agreement.  In the event of a change in control in HSW International, any unvested options held by each of Messrs. Arnold, Adorno and Swayne and Ms. Meredith shall fully vest on the date of the change of control.30, 2010.
 
 
62


Summary Compensation Table



(1)Henry N. Adorno’s Other Compensation consisted of a living expense allowance.  J. David Darnell’s Other Compensation consisted of a $200,000 severance payment and $100,000 of consulting fees.

(2)J. David Darnell’s 2007 compensation includes compensation paid by INTAC.  Mr. Darnell retired as our Chief Financial Officer effective July 31, 2008.  We entered into a six month consulting agreement with Mr. Darnell ending January 31, 2009.  Mr. Darnell was paid $20,000 per month in exchange for his services.

(3)Shawn Meredith was appointed Chief Financial Officer on August 12, 2008.


63



Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2008

The following table provides information about the number and value of unexercised options for the named executive officers as of December 31, 2008.  No named executive officers exercised any stock options during fiscal years 2008 or 2007 and no SARs have been granted.

Name
Number of
securities
underlying
 unexercised
options
(#)
exercisable
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
Option
exercise
price
($)
Option
expiration
date
     
Henry N. Adorno194,44455,556$6.50August 23, 2016
Henry N. Adorno194,44455,556$7.10October 10, 2017
Henry N. Adorno10,020$3.25August 12, 2018
Gregory M. Swayne77,77822,222$6.50August 23, 2016
Gregory M. Swayne77,77822,222$7.10October 10, 2017
Gregory M. Swayne10,020$3.25August 12, 2018
J. David Darnell150,000$3.50July 29, 2012
Shawn G. Meredith25,000$3.80May 28, 2018
Shawn G. Meredith25,000$3.25August 12, 2018
Shawn G. Meredith3,340$3.25August 12, 2018

Compensation of Directors
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws specifically grant to our Board of Directors the authority to fix the compensation of the directors.  For 2008 service, we paid our non-employee directors the amounts set forth in the following table:

2008 Director Compensation

Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($)(2) All Other Compensation ($) 
Total
($)(2)
           
Jeffrey T. Arnold $0 $0 $402,500 $0 $402,500
Theodore P. Botts $20,000 $35,000 $0 $0 $55,000
Kai-Shing Tao $17,500 $35,000 $0 $0 $52,500
Arthur F. Kingsbury $17,500 $35,000 $0 $0 $52,500
Boland T. Jones $15,000 $35,000 $0 $0 $50,000

(1)           Includes annual retainers for members of the Board of Directors and retainers for the chairman of each of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees.

(2)           Bruce L. Campbell and Jeffrey T. Arnold received no compensation as directors because they are employed by Discovery, which owns approximately 43% of our shares.  Mr. Arnold received all of his compensation pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, described below.

On March 10, 2008, our board of directors adopted a Director Compensation Plan for the year ended December 31, 2008, for its independent directors. Such plan provides for the following:

Annual cash retainer$15,000
Annual restricted stock grant value$35,000
Total annual compensation$50,000

64


In addition, the Chairmen of our Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committees each receives additional cash compensation of $2,500 per year, and the Chairman of our Audit Committee receives additional compensation of $5,000 per year. We also reimburse all directors for HSWI-related travel expenses in accordance with our Company-wide policy.
The terms for the payment of our independent director compensation include the following:

·  Cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears.
·  Restricted stock is granted at the beginning of the year in an amount then equal to the specified cash value determined as the average of the first 15 trading days of the year, resulting in a per share value for our 2008 grant of $4.23.
·  Restricted stock vests in full on December 31 of the year of grant, contingent upon the recipient having attended at least 75% of board meetings held during the year; otherwise, vesting will be prorated based on attendance.

Arnold Consulting Agreement

On September 22, 2008, we amended the consulting agreement with Mr. Arnold that we originally entered into on August 23, 2006.  The amendment extended the term of the consulting agreement through May 31, 2009, and provided as compensation for the extended service term a grant to Mr. Arnold of a five-year option to acquire 350,000 shares of our common stock.  We agreed with Mr. Arnold that the options would have a per share exercise price of $3.68, which represents the price at which we had most recently sold shares to investors, and was higher than the market closing price on the date of grant, September 22, 2008.  The options will vest at the end of the amended term, May 31, 2009.

The consulting agreement permits Mr. Arnold to engage in non-competitive employment or consulting activities, including specifically activities for and on behalf of HowStuffWorks.  Mr. Arnold is prohibited from competing with us in our territories during the term of the consulting agreement and for a period of one year thereafter.  The consulting agreement provides that Mr. Arnold is obligated to notify either HowStuffWorks or us of any corporate opportunities that may benefit us as well as HowStuffWorks, and HowStuffWorks and we will thereafter determine how to act upon such opportunity.

As compensation for the initial term of his consulting services, we granted Mr. Arnold a ten-year option to acquire 3,000,000 shares of HSW International's common stock, which grant was made on August 23, 2006.  The consulting agreement also provided that we grant options to acquire an additional 1,000,000 shares to one or more individuals in the eligible grantee group, which includes Mr. Arnold.  The consulting agreement further provided that Mr. Arnold shall recommend to us a suggested manner of allocating the additional options, and we granted 1,000,000 options based on Mr. Arnold’s suggestion on August 23, 2006.  All of the options granted under the initial term of the consulting agreement have a per share exercise price of $6.50, the fair market value on the date of grant.  All of these initial 4,000,000 options have vested in full.

In the event that Mr. Arnold is terminated for cause under the consulting agreement, any unvested options shall terminate with the termination of the consulting agreement.  Cause is defined in the consulting agreement as (i) conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony that results in material damage to our business or reputation, (ii) gross misconduct that results in material damage to our business or reputation, (iii) act of dishonesty or fraud in connection with the performance of his responsibilities with the intention that such act results in improper and substantial personal enrichment, (iv) violation or breach of any contractual duty that results in substantial monetary harm to us or any fiduciary duty owed to us.  Cause shall not exist under (iv) if such act is done by Mr. Arnold in the good faith belief that it would be beneficial to us or failure to act is done in the good faith belief that the act would be materially harmful to us.

If a change of control (as defined in our equity incentive plan) of the company shall occur during the term of the consulting agreement, any unvested options shall fully vest as of the date of the change in control.  To the extent vested, the options shall be irrevocable and may be exercised by Mr. Arnold’s heirs or estate.


65


ITEM 12.  12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 30, 2009 for the following:

·  Each person or entity known to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding common stock;
·  Each director;
·  Each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation table; and
·  All current executive officers and directors as a group.

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 53,698,292 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 30, 2009, together with applicable options for each stockholder.  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, based on factors including voting and investment power with respect to shares.  Common stock subject to options currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days after March 30, 2009, are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding those options, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person.  The address of each executive officer and director is c/o HSW International, Inc., One Capital City Plaza, 3350 Peachtree Road, Suite 1600, Atlanta, Georgia 30326. For information relating to beneficial owners of greater than 5% of our common stock who are not insiders, we rely upon the reports filed by such persons or entities on Schedule 13G.

Name of Beneficial Owners 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
  
Percentage of
Ownership
 
       
Discovery Communications, Inc.(1)  23,190,727   43.19%
One Discovery Place        
Silver Spring, Maryland 20814        
         
Eastern Advisors Capital Group, Ltd.(2)  8,007,259   14.91%
c/o Caledonian Fund Services (Cayman) Limited        
Caledonian House        
69 Dr. Roy’s Drive        
Grand Cayman KY1 - 1102        
Cayman Islands        
         
Capital Research Global Investors  3,686,380   6.86%
333 South Hope Street        
Los Angeles, California 90071        


66



 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
  
Percentage of
Ownership
 
       
Executive Officers and Directors:      
Jeffrey T. Arnold (3)  26,400,727   49.16%
Henry N. Adorno (4)  476,728   * 
Gregory M. Swayne (5)  214,229   * 
J. David Darnell (6)  184,000   * 
Theodore P. Botts (7)  108,274   * 
Shawn G. Meredith (8)  13,076   * 
Boland T. Jones  8,274   * 
Arthur F. Kingsbury  8,274   * 
Kai-Shing Tao  8,274   * 
Bruce L. Campbell     * 
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (10 people)  27,421,856   51.07%

*Represents less than 1%.

(1)Includes 22,940,727 shares of our common stock and 250,000 exercisable warrants beneficially owned by HowStuffWorks, Inc.

(2)
Based on information contained in Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2009 by Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC, Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. and Scott Booth.  All three report shared voting and dispositive power over the shares.  The address for Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC and Scott Booth is 101 Park Avenue, 48th floor, New York, New York 10178.

(3)Includes (i) 22,940,727 shares of our common stock and 250,000 exercisable warrants beneficially owned by HowStuffWorks, Inc., over which Mr. Arnold could be deemed to have voting and dispositive power in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of HowStuffWorks, (ii) 3,200,000 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and (iii) 10,000 shares owned directly by Mr. Arnold.

(4)Includes 467,498 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and 9,230 shares owned by Mr. Adorno.

(5)Includes 204,999 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and 9,230 shares owned by Mr. Swayne.

(6)Includes 150,000 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and 34,000 shares owned by Mr. Darnell.

(7)Includes 100,000 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and 8,274 shares owned by Mr. Botts.

(8)Includes 10,000 shares of our common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options and 3,076 shares owned by Ms. Meredith.


67



Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
The following table providesresponse to Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information asto be set forth in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of December 31, 2008 on our equity compensation plans currently in effect.

  
 
(a)
Number of Securities to be issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  
 
(b)
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  
(c)
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Related
 
          
Equity compensation plans approved         
by security holders
  7,603,456  $6.30   896,544 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved            
by security holders
    $N/A    
             
Total  7,603,456  $6.30   896,544 
Stockholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 30, 2010.
 

68


ITEM 13.13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

Our Board of DirectorsThe response to Item 13 is currently composed of seven directors, four of whom our Board has determinedincorporated herein by reference to the information to be independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.  These four directors are Messrs. Botts, Jones, Kingsbury and Tao.  As part of such determination of independence, our Board has affirmatively determined that none of these directors has any relationship with HSWI that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his responsibilities as a director.

Related Party Transactions

Our policy regarding transactions with our officers, directors, principal shareholders and their affiliates is that they may be made on terms no less favorable to us than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.  All transactions between us and our officers, directors, principal stockholders and their affiliates must be approved by our Audit Committee or a majority of the disinterested directors, and must continue to be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Contribution Agreements

Pursuant to the terms of two contribution agreements, HowStuffWorks contributed content owned by or licensed to HowStuffWorks to us by granting to us a perpetual, fully paid, royalty-free, sublicensable, exclusive license in certain territories. The content specifically consists of the right to render Chinese and Portuguese translations of, the right to publish or use any or all actual renderings in the translated languages and all such actual renderings of, such licensed and sublicensed content, including derivative works, solely in digital and/or electronic form. All sublicensed content is subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the applicable third party licenses from whichProxy Statement for the sublicensed content is sublicensed. HowStuffWorks isAnnual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the sole and exclusive owner of the licensed content, the applicable third party licensors are the sole and exclusive owners of the applicable sublicensed content and we are the sole and exclusive owner of the content, subject to HowStuffWorks and its licensors’ rights in the underlying content.Commission not later than April 30, 2010.

HowStuffWorks also granted to us a limited, perpetual, fully paid, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-transferable, exclusive license in the territories to (i) use the content solely for purposes of translating it into the translation languages, and (ii) use limited excerpts of the licensed content translated into the translation languages in print format with limited distribution to businesses solely for purposes of marketing, business development, financings and other similar legitimate business purposes, provided that any such limited print excerpts are not distributed publicly.

HowStuffWorks may terminate the licenses in either of the territories upon written notice to us if: (i) we file a petition for bankruptcy or are adjudicated bankrupt; (ii) a petition in bankruptcy is filed against us and this petition is not dismissed within ninety calendar days; (iii) we become insolvent or make an assignment for the benefit of our creditors or an arrangement for our creditors pursuant to any bankruptcy law; (iv) we discontinue the business that is covered by either of the contribution agreements; (v) a receiver is appointed for us or our business; or (vi) we are in material breach of any of the terms or conditions set forth in either of the contribution agreements, which breach remains uncured 30 days after written notice of such breach from HowStuffWorks so long as such material breach was not caused by any action or inaction of HowStuffWorks, and HowStuffWorks did not prevent or limit our attempts to cure such breach.

Update Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of an update agreement, HowStuffWorks will provide all updates (i.e., modifications and new content) to us for our purchase. With respect to updated content that we elect to purchase, HowStuffWorks will grant to us the same license rights as those granted pursuant to the contribution agreements with respect to any updates to the content licensed pursuant to the contribution agreement for a fee equal to (i) one percent per territory of HowStuffWorks’ fully allocated costs directly attributable to producing the updates purchased by us and (ii) HowStuffWorks’ actual cost in transferring the purchased updates to us, plus (iii) five percent of (i) and (ii) above. Sublicensed content restrictions, ownership rights and termination rights are the same as those granted pursuant to the contribution agreements.  HowStuffWorks may suspend its obligation to provide updates to us if we fail to pay any update fee for 90 days after such fee was due or if we become insolvent.


69


Letter Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement, we have the option to acquire the exclusive digital publishing rights for the content in India and Russia in the local languages on the same terms and conditions as those with respect to China and Brazil under the contribution agreements and the update agreement.  We have the right to exercise this option until April 2, 2009. If we exercise this option, a limited partnership or limited liability company will be formed, and we will, and will also cause INTAC to, contribute all of their respective assets to the formed entity.  In exchange, we and INTAC will receive in the aggregate a number of units in the formed entity equal to the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. The number of units to be received by us and INTAC will be allocated based on the relative fair market value of their assets contributed to the formed entity.  HowStuffWorks will contribute the exclusive digital publishing rights for the content in India and Russia to the formed entity and receive 6,000,000 units in the entity.  HowStuffWorks will have the right to exchange any or all of its units for shares of our common stock. Income and loss of the formed entity will be allocated among the parties on a pro rata basis. Upon the issuance of any shares of our common stock, we will be issued from the formed entity one additional unit for each share of our common stock issued. In exchange, we will transfer to the formed entity the net proceeds (if any) received by us upon the issuance of such shares. As a result of the consummation of the HowStuffWorks and Discovery merger, the agreement was amended to provide that HSW International’s option to acquire the exclusive digital publishing rights for HowStuffWorks’ content in India and Russia cannot be exercised so long as the issuance of securities in connection with such exercise would result in HowStuffWorks’ ownership of HSW International, directly or indirectly, exceeding 50%; provided that the option shall be extended for any time period during which it cannot be exercised in accordance with the foregoing.

Trademark License Agreement

A trademark side letter dated April 20, 2006, between HowStuffWorks and HSW International was amended to provide that the license fee will be 2% of HSW International’s net revenue derived from use of the licensed name and marks in the territory, up to a limit of $100,000 annually for the territory, and that HSW International shall have the right to an option to an exclusive license from HowStuffWorks for use of HowStuffWorks’ name and other marks in India and Russia, which right must be exercised at the same time the option contemplated by the India and Russia Side Letter Agreement is exercised and for which the license fee will be 2% of HSW International’s net revenue derived from use of the licensed name and marks in India and Russia, up to an aggregate limit of $100,000 annually for India and Russia.

Stockholders Agreement

Transfer Restrictions. HowStuffWorks may not make or solicit any sale of, or create, incur or assume any encumbrance with respect to, our common stock issued to it pursuant to the asset contribution (referred to as the HowStuffWorks asset contribution stock) during the period ending (i) 12 months after the closing of our merger with INTAC with respect to one-third of the shares of HowStuffWorks asset contribution stock, (ii) 18 months after the closing of the merger with respect to the next one-third of the shares of HowStuffWorks asset contribution stock and (iii) 24 months after the closing of the merger with respect to the remaining one-third of the shares of HowStuffWorks asset contribution stock, except that during the applicable restricted period HowStuffWorks may make or solicit a sale to a permitted transferee.  No sale of HowStuffWorks asset contribution stock to a permitted transferee will be effective if it was a purpose of such transfer to circumvent the restrictions above.

Corporate Governance. HSW International and HowStuffWorks have entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement.  HowStuffWorks has the right to designate three directors of HSW International (one of whom shall be an independent director), and HowStuffWorks has the right to designate the chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee. All shares of HSW International owned by HowStuff Works in excess of 45% of the outstanding shares of HSW International as of any applicable record date, if any, shall be voted in exact proportion to the vote of HSW International stockholders other than HowStuffWorks.  HowStuffWorks will have the right to vote in its discretion its shares up to and including 45% of the outstanding shares as of any applicable record date.  The three HowStuffWorks-designated members are Jeffrey Arnold, Arthur Kingsbury and Bruce Campbell.

Additional Content. If we acquire any rights in any text, images, designs, graphics, artwork or other content (referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the additional content), we will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, as a part of such acquisition, (i) the worldwide digital publishing rights to such additional content and (ii) digital publishing rights for HowStuffWorks in respect of such additional content for use outside the territories ((i) and (ii), referred to as the additional rights). Notwithstanding the foregoing, we will not be required to pay or be obligated to incur additional fees or costs for additional rights obtained for HowStuffWorks unless HowStuffWorks agrees to bear such additional fees and/or costs.

70

Non-Competition. We agree that, during the term of the stockholders agreement, we will not, and will use our best efforts to cause each of our subsidiaries to not, within the United States, (a) enter into any agreement with, hold any equity or financial interest in, or permit our name or any part thereof to be associated in business with, any person that provides any services or products that compete with any services or products of HowStuffWorks in the United States, or (b) otherwise provide any services or products that compete with any services or products of HowStuffWorks in the United States, except with the prior written consent of HowStuffWorks.

Termination. The stockholders agreement may be terminated by written agreement of all parties with rights under the stockholders agreement, or upon the expiration of (i) all rights created pursuant to the stockholders agreement and (ii) all applicable statutes of limitations applicable to the enforcement of claims under the stockholders agreement, except that our right to participate in other markets transactions and HowStuffWorks’ rights to any additional content will terminate three years after the date of the stockholders agreement. The rights of HowStuffWorks pursuant to the provisions regarding transfer restrictions and corporate governance will terminate on the date HowStuffWorks beneficially owns less than 10% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis. The transfer restrictions will terminate upon a change of control of us or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

Registration Rights Agreements

In connection with the merger, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with HowStuffWorks that provides it the right to make three requests to us to register its shares on Form S-3, and unlimited requests to us to include shares on other registration statements filed by us.

Stock Purchase Agreements

In connection with the merger, Ashford Capital Partners, L.P. Inc., which held approximately 5.3% of INTAC’s common stock prior to the merger, purchased 456,621 shares of our common stock for a price per share equal to $6.57, subject to adjustment on the eleventh trading day after the registration statement for their shares became effective. On February 4, 2008, an additional 358,596 shares of our common stock were issued to Ashford Capital Partners, L.P. pursuant to the purchase price adjustment.

In connection with the merger, DWS Finanz-Service GmbH (one of the European investors) agreed to purchase $16 million of our common stock on the eleventh trading day after the registration statement for their shares was declared effective by the SEC. In connection with the closing of such issuance, the purchase amount was reduced to approximately $11 million.  The purchase price for the common stock was the lesser of $6.57 or 90% of the 10 trading day volume weighted average price of our common stock commencing on the first trading day following the date on which the registration statement for the resale of such shares was declared effective by the SEC. The terms of the stock purchase were the same as the other European investors (with one investor subject to an additional provision that if the per share purchase price calculated is greater than the highest trading price of our common stock on the closing date of the purchase, then the per share purchase price will be adjusted to be such highest trading price). Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft , an affiliate of DWS Finanz-Service GmbH, owned approximately 8.8% of INTAC’s common stock prior to the merger.

Sale of the INTAC Legacy Businesses and Related Transactions

As described in Item 1. Business, in February and March 2008 we sold two INTAC legacy businesses to Wei Zhou, who was the president and chief executive officer of INTAC, for 5,000,000 of our common shares owned by Mr. Zhou. Simultaneous with the disposition, we sold the 5,000,000 shares we received from Mr. Zhou to the Eastern Advisors funds.  As a result of these transactions, Eastern Advisors beneficially owns approximately 11.07% of our outstanding stock.
 

 
71

 

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Summary of Auditor Fees and Pre-Approval Policy

Our Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of all audit and permitted non-audit services that may be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.  Under this policy, each year, at the time it engages the auditors, the Audit Committee pre-approves the audit engagement terms and fees and may also pre-approve detailed types of audit-related and permitted tax services, subject to certain dollar limits, to be performed during the year.  All other permitted non-audit services are required to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee on an engagement-by-engagement basis.  All of the auditor fees for the last two years, as detailed below, were pre-approved by the Audit Committee or full Board.  The Audit Committee may delegate its authority to pre-approve services to one or more of its members, whose activities are reported to the Audit Committee at each regularly scheduled meeting.

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered to HSWI by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2009 and Grant Thornton LLP in 2007 and 2008.  A description of these various fees and services follows the table.

 2007  2008  2009  2008 
Audit Fees $654,094  $299,531  $281,794  $299,531 
Audit-Related Fees $21,646  $  $  $ 
Tax Fees $  $  $  $ 
All Other Fees $  $  $  $ 
Total $675,740  $299,531  $281,794  $299,531 

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Grant Thornton LLP in connection with the annual audit, for the reviews of HSWI’s financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and for other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, were approximately $654,094$281,794 for 20072009 and $299,531 for 2008.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by Grant Thornton LLP for audit-related services were approximately $21,646 for due diligence related services in 2007.  Grant Thornton LLP did not provide audit-related services for 2008.2008 nor did PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provide audit-related services in 2009.

Tax Fees

Grant Thornton LLP did not provide tax related services for 2007 or 2008.2008 nor did PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provide tax related services for 2009.

All Other Fees

We did not engage PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or Grant Thornton LLP for any services other than those listed above during 20072009 or 2008.

 



PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

SCHEDULE II:II:  VALUATION AND QUALIFIYINGQUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008:

Schedule II
HSW International, Inc.
Valuation & Qualifying Accounts

                     
    Additions          Additions      
 Balance at  charged        Balance at charged      
 beginning  to costs and     Balance at  beginning to costs and    Balance at 
Classification of year  expenses  Deductions  end of year  of year expenses Deductions  end of year 
                     
Allowance for doubtful accounts:                     
                     
2009 $15,343    15,343  $ 
             
2008 $  15,343    $15,343  $ 
15,343
    $15,343 
                
2007 $      $ 

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.

(a)(3) The exhibits to this report are listed on the Index to Exhibits following the signature pages of this report.

(b) Exhibits.

See the Exhibit Index following the signature pages of this report.



 
73

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 3115stth day of March 2009.April 2010.

 HSW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   
 By:
/s/ Henry N. AdornoGregory M. Swayne
  Henry N. AdornoGregory M. Swayne
  Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the 3115stth day of March 2009.April 2010.

   
Name Title
   
/s/ Henry N. AdornoGregory M. Swayne Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer and Director
Henry N. AdornoGregory M. Swayne 
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
/s/ Shawn G. Meredith Chief Financial Officer
Shawn G. Meredith 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 Jeffrey T. Arnold    Director
   
/s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldScott V. Booth Chairman of the BoardDirector
Jeffrey T. ArnoldScott Booth  
   
/s/ Theodore P. Botts Director
Theodore P. Botts  
   
/s/ Bruce L. CampbellMichael J. Cascone Director
Bruce L. CampbellMichael Cascone  
   
/s/ Boland T. Jones Director
Boland T. Jones  
   
/s/ Arthur F. Kingsbury Director
Arthur F. Kingsbury  

/s/ Kai-Shing Tao Director
Kai-Shing Tao  


 
74

 
 
 
(b) Exhibits.

Exhibit   Registrant’s   Exhibit Filed
Number Description of Document Form Dated Number Herewith
           
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 20, 2006, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex A  
           
2.2 First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 29, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex B  
           
2.3 Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 23, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-1/A 01/14/08 2.3  
           
2.4 Share Purchase Agreement among INTAC International, Inc., China Trend Holdings Ltd. and Wei Zhou, dated February 15, 2008 8-K 2/20/08 2.4  
           
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of HSW International, Inc. 8-A12B 10/03/07 99.2  
           
3.2 Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HSW International, Inc. 8-K 12/18/07 3.2  
           
4.1 Specimen certificate of common stock of HSW International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 4.1  
           
4.2 HSW International 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. S-8 11/05/07 4.2  
           
4.3 Registration Rights Agreement among HSW International, Inc., HowStuffWorks, Inc. and Wei Zhou dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.6  
           
4.4 Registration Rights Agreement among HSW International, Inc. and American investors dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.5  
           
4.5 Affiliate Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.7  
           
10.1 Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc. and Wei Zhou. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex H  
           
10.2 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International and Wei Zhou. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.2  
Exhibit   Registrant’s   Exhibit Filed
Number Description of Document Form Dated Number Herewith
           
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 20, 2006, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex A  
           
2.2 First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 29, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex B  
           
2.3 Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 23, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc., HSW International Merger Corporation and INTAC International, Inc. S-1/A 01/14/08 2.3  
           
2.4 Share Purchase Agreement among INTAC International, Inc., China Trend Holdings Ltd. and Wei Zhou, dated February 15, 2008 8-K 2/20/08 2.4  
           
2.5 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 26, 2008, by and among HSW International, Inc., DS Newco, Inc., DailyStrength, Inc. and Douglas J. Hirsch 8-K 12/03/08 10.25  
           
2.6 (1) Asset Purchase Agreement by and among HSW International, Inc., DailyStrength, Inc., DS Acquisition, Inc. and Sharecare, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2009 10-Q 11/16/09 10.28  
           
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of HSW International, Inc., as amended       X
           
3.2 Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HSW International, Inc. 8-K 12/18/07 3.2  
           
4.1 Specimen certificate of common stock of HSW International, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 4.1  
           
4.2 HSW International 2006 Equity Incentive Plan S-8 11/05/07 4.2  
           
4.3 Registration Rights Agreement among HSW International, Inc., HowStuffWorks, Inc. and Wei Zhou dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.6  
           
4.4 Registration Rights Agreement among HSW International, Inc. and American investors dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.5  
           
4.5** Affiliate Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.7  
 
 
75

 

 
Exhibit   Registrant’s   Exhibit Filed
Number Description of Document Form Dated Number Herewith
           
10.3 Contribution Agreement (PRC Territories) between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc., dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.2  
           
10.4 Contribution Agreement (Brazil) between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.1  
           
10.5 Update Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. dated as of October 2, 2007. 8-K 10/09/07 10.4  
           
 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Ashford Capital Management, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-a  
           
10.7 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Ashford Capital Partners, L.P. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.7  
           
10.8 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Harvest 2004, LLC. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-b  
           
10.9 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Harvest 2004, LLC. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.9  
           
10.10 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and the Purchasers named therein. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-c  
           
10.11 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and the Purchasers named therein. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.11  
           
10.12 Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 20, 2006 between HSW International and DWS Finanz-Service GmbH. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex K  
           
10.13 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 29, 2007 between HSW International and DWS Finanz-Service GmbH. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex L  
           
10.14 Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated August 23, 2006 between HSW International and Jeffrey T. Arnold. S-4 03/14/07 10.11  
ExhibitRegistrant’sExhibitFiled
NumberDescription of DocumentFormDatedNumberHerewith
           
10.1 Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International, Inc. and Wei Zhou S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex H  
           
10.2 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2007, among HowStuffWorks, Inc., HSW International and Wei Zhou S-1/A 01/14/08 10.2  
           
10.3 Contribution Agreement (PRC Territories) between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc., dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.2  
           
10.4 Contribution Agreement (Brazil) between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.1  
           
10.5 Update Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. dated as of October 2, 2007 8-K 10/09/07 10.4  
           
10.6 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Ashford Capital Management, Inc. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-a  
           
10.7 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Ashford Capital Partners, L.P. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.7  
           
10.8 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Harvest 2004, LLC S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-b  
           
10.9 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and Harvest 2004, LLC S-1/A 01/14/08 10.9  
           
10.10 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and the Purchasers named therein S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex I-c  
           
10.11 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 between HSW International, Inc. and the Purchasers named therein S-1/A 01/14/08 10.11  
           
10.12 Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 20, 2006 between HSW International and DWS Finanz-Service GmbH S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex K  
           
10.13 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 29, 2007 between HSW International and DWS Finanz-Service GmbH S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex L  
           
10.14** Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated August 23, 2006 between HSW International and Jeffrey T. Arnold S-4 03/14/07 10.11  
 
 
76

 

 
Exhibit     Registrant’s           ExhibitFiled
NumberDescription of Document    Form         Dated           NumberHerewith
Exhibit   Registrant’s   Exhibit Filed
Number Description of Document Form Dated Number Herewith
           
10.14.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated August 23, 2006 between HSW International and Jeffrey T. Arnold. 8-K 9/23/08 10.14  
           
10.15 Amended and Restated Letter Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. related to certain rights in India and Russia dated as of December 17, 2007. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.15  
           
10.16 Amended and Restated Letter Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. related to certain trademark rights dated as of December 17, 2007. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.16  
           
10.17 Employment Agreement dated October 16, 2001 between INTAC International, Inc. and Wei Zhou (filed by INTAC International, Inc., Commission File No 000-32621). 8-K 10/30/01 10.5  
           
10.18 Share Purchase Agreement, dated January 29, 2007, among INTAC International, Inc., INTAC International Holdings Limited, INTAC (Tianjin) International Trading Company, Cyber Proof Investments Ltd. and Wei Zhou. S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex R  
           
 First Amendment to Share Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 among INTAC International, Inc., INTAC International Holdings Limited, INTAC (Tianjin) International Trading Company, Cyber Proof Investments Ltd. and Wei Zhou. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.19  
           
10.20 Termination Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and HowStuffWorks, Inc., dated as of December 17, 2007. S-1/A 01/14/08 10.20  
           
10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement between HSW International, Inc. and the investors named therein, dated February 15, 2008. 8-K 2/20/08 10.21  
           
10.22 Separation Agreement with J. David Darnell dated May 13, 2008. 10-Q 5/15/08 10.22  
           
10.23† 
2008 Executive Compensation Plan.
 
 8-K 08/19/08 10.23  
           
10.24† Content License Agreement dated September 17, 2008 between HSW International, Inc. and World Book, Inc. 10-Q 11/14/08 10.24  

           
10.14.1** Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated August 23, 2006 between HSW International and Jeffrey T. Arnold 8-K 9/23/08 10.14  
           
10.15 Amended and Restated Letter Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. related to certain rights in India and Russia dated as of December 17, 2007 S-1/A 01/14/08 10.15  
           
10.16 Amended and Restated Letter Agreement between HowStuffWorks, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. related to certain trademark rights dated as of December 17, 2007 S-1/A 01/14/08 10.16  
           
10.17** Employment Agreement dated October 16, 2001 between INTAC International, Inc. and Wei Zhou (filed by INTAC International, Inc., Commission File No 000-32621) 8-K 10/30/01 10.5  
           
10.18 Share Purchase Agreement, dated January 29, 2007, among INTAC International, Inc., INTAC International Holdings Limited, INTAC (Tianjin) International Trading Company, Cyber Proof Investments Ltd. and Wei Zhou S-4/A 07/10/07 Annex R  
           
 10.19 First Amendment to Share Purchase Agreement dated as of August 23, 2007 among INTAC International, Inc., INTAC International Holdings Limited, INTAC (Tianjin) International Trading Company, Cyber Proof Investments Ltd. and Wei Zhou S-1/A 01/14/08 10.19  
           
10.20 Termination Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and HowStuffWorks, Inc., dated as of December 17, 2007 S-1/A 01/14/08 10.20  
           
10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement between HSW International, Inc. and the investors named therein, dated February 15, 2008 8-K 2/20/08 10.21  
           
10.22** Separation Agreement with J. David Darnell dated May 13, 2008 10-Q 5/15/08 10.22  
           
10.23†** 
2008 Executive Compensation Plan
 
 8-K/A 1/16/09 10.23  
           
10.24† Content License Agreement dated September 17, 2008 between HSW International, Inc. and World Book, Inc. and Amendment 10-Q 11/14/08 10.24  
           
10.25 Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement 8-K 1/16/09 10.1  
           
10.26** Letter Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and Gregory Swayne dated September 28, 2009 10-Q 11/16/09 10.26  
 
77

 

 
ExhibitRegistrant’sExhibitFiled
NumberDescription of DocumentFormDatedNumberHerewith
Exhibit   Registrant’s   Exhibit Filed
Number Description of Document Form Dated Number Herewith
           
10.25† Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 26, 2008 by and among HSW International, Inc., DS Newco, Inc., Daily Strength, Inc. and Douglas J. Hirsch 8-K 12/03/08 10.25  
           
14.1 HSW International, Inc. Amended and Restated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. 8-K 4/18/08 14.1  
           
23.2 
Consent of Grant Thornton, LLP.
       X
           
31.1 Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 or section 240.15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.       X
           
31.2 Certification by the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 or section 240.15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.       X
           
32* Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Certification by the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        

10.27** Confidential Separation and Release Agreement dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between HSW International, Inc. and Henry Adorno 10-Q 11/16/09 10.27  
           
10.29 Subscription Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and Sharecare, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2009 10-Q 11/16/09 10.29  
           
10.30 Secured Promissory Note issued by HSW International, Inc. to Sharecare, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2009 10-Q 11/16/09 10.30  
           
10.31† Letter Agreement for Services Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and Sharecare, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2009 10-Q/A 1/22/10 10.31  
           
10.31.1 First Amendment to the Letter Agreement for Services by and between Sharecare, Inc. and HSW International, Inc. dated December 30, 2009 8-K 1/7/10 10.31.1  
           
10.32 License Agreement dated as of October 30, 2009, by and among HSW International, Inc., Sharecare Inc. ZoCo 1, LLC, Discovery SC Investment, Inc., Oz Works, L.L.C., and Arnold Media Group, LLC 10-Q/A 1/22/10 10.31  
           
10.33 Sublease Agreement by and between HSW International, Inc. and Sharecare, Inc. dated as of March 30, 2010 8-K 4/5/10 10.33  
           
14.1 HSW International, Inc. Amended and Restated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 8-K 4/18/08 14.1  
           
21.1 Subsidiaries       X
           
23.2.1 
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
        
           
23.2.2 Consent of Grant Thornton, LLP       X
           
31.1 Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 or section 240.15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended       X
           
31.2 Certification by the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 240.13a-14 or section 240.15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended       X
           
32* Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Certification by the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002        


(1) Schedules and exhibits have been omitted from the exhibit. A list of omitted schedules and exhibits is set forth immediately following the table of contents of the exhibit.  Copies will be provided to the Commission upon request.

† The registrant has requested confidential treatment with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.  Such portions have been omitted from this exhibit and have been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

* This exhibit is hereby furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of the Section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

**Executive Compensation Arrangement pursuant to 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K



78



Exhibit 23.2.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-127149) of HSW International, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2010 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
78/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 15, 2010

79





Exhibit 23.2.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, of our reports dated March 25, 2009 (except for the 10-for-1 reverse split of issued and outstanding common shares discussed in Note 16, as to which the date is April 15, 2010), with respect to the financial statements and schedule, appearing in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-127149), effective November 5, 2007, of HSW International, Inc. and subsidiaries filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Atlanta, GA
April 15, 2010

80


Exhibit 31.1

Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gregory M. Swayne, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HSW International, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

81


b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: April 15, 2010
/s/ Gregory M. Swayne
Gregory M. Swayne
Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 302, has been provided to HSW International and will be retained by HSW International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

82


Exhibit 31.2
Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Shawn G. Meredith, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HSW International, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



83



 
b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: April 15, 2010
/s/ Shawn G. Meredith
Shawn G. Meredith
Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 302, has been provided to HSW International and will be retained by HSW International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

84


Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of HSW International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in the Report.



April 15, 2010April 15, 2010
By:/s/ Gregory M. SwayneBy:/s/ Shawn G. Meredith
Gregory M. SwayneShawn G. Meredith
Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HSW International, Inc. and will be retained by HSW International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.