United States UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF  

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172023

Commission file number 1-11398

CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

91 Heartland Blvd., Edgewood, New York11717

 (Address of principal executive offices)

(631)586-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ☐     No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ☒   No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ☐     No  ☒

As of June 30, 20172023 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock (based on its reported last sale price on the NYSE American on June 30, 2023 of $9.40)$3.89) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $73,550,935.$46,445,647.

As of March 5, 2018,April 4, 2024, the registrant had 8,878,96512,854,428 shares of common shares,stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) fromPortions of the definitiveCPI Aerostructures, Inc. Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later thanwithin 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this report.Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to the registrant’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  

FORM 10-K  

ANNUAL REPORT 

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the words or phrases “believe”, “intend”, “plan”, “will”, “will likely result”, “we expect”, “could”, “will continue”, “anticipated”, “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that future developments will be those that have been anticipated. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements. Further, such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. Numerous factors, including the risk factors described in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward looking statements for any reason except as required by law.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K speak only as of the date of its filing. Except where required by applicable law, we expressly disclaim a duty to provide updates to forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-K to reflect subsequent events, changed circumstances, changes in expectations, or the estimates and assumptions associated with them. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the federal securities laws.

You should read the financial information set forth below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

During our review of the Company’s (defined below) deferred income tax positions as of December 31, 2023, we determined that, due to the inadequate review, assessment of and reporting of the Company’s temporary differences between book and taxable income, the Company’s December 31, 2022 deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities balances as previously reported by the Company in Note 11 “Income Taxes” of the Company’s financial statements which were included within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, require restatement. The restatement of these balances has no impact to the Company’s previously reported net deferred tax asset on its December 31, 2022 balance sheet and no impact to the Company’s previously reported net income, earnings per share or cash flow for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022. The restatement of the aforementioned balances, as well as additional details regarding the restatement adjustments, appears in Note 11 “Income Taxes” of the Company’s financial statements included within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Company management has determined that a material weakness exists in the Company’s internal controls relating to the review, assessment of and reporting of the Company’s temporary differences between book and taxable income and has included disclosure of this material weakness in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Part II Item 1. BUSINESS9A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as described above and as amended in this Annual Report on From 10-K, we have not amended and do not intend to amend any of our previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

GeneralPART I

General

CPI Aerostructures, Inc., including its wholly owned subsidiary Welding Metallurgy, Inc. (“CPI Aero®”WMI”) and Compac Development Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of WMI (collectively, “CPI Aero”, the “Company”, “us”, or “we”) is a United Statesmanufacturer of structural assemblies, integrated systems, and kitted components for the domestic and international aerospace and defense (“U.S.”A&D”) suppliermarkets. Our products are generally used by customers in the production of aircraft parts for fixed wing aircraft, helicopters, electronic warfare (“EW”) systems, intelligence, surveillance, and helicopters in both the commercialreconnaissance (“ISR”) systems, missiles, and defense markets.other sophisticated A&D products. We are a manufacturer of structural aircraft parts and aerosystems. Additionally, we leverage our global supply chain skills to assist our customers in managing a diverse worldwide supplier market by providing “one stop shopping” for an assortment of aerospace parts. Within the global aerostructures supply chain, we are eitherprimarily a Tier 1 supplier to aircraft original equipment manufacturersOriginal Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) or. We are also a Tier 2 subcontractorsupplier to majorlarger Tier 1 manufacturers. We also aremanufacturers and a prime contractor to the United States (“U.S.”) Department of Defense (“DOD”), primarily the United StatesU.S. Air Force (“USAF”). Our products are used by OEMs within both commercial aerospace and national security markets. In addition to our assembly operations, we provide engineering;manufacturing engineering, program management, supply chain management, kitting, and maintenance repair and overhaul (“MRO”) services.

Among the key programs for which CPI Aero provides key structural components, assemblies or aerospace systems are: E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, F-35 Joint strike fighter, UH-60 BLACK HAWK® helicopter, DB-110 reconnaissance system, Raytheon Next Generation Jammerpod, Increment 1 electronic warfare system, F-16 Falcon and T-38 Pacer Classic III. Key civilian aircraft programs include the Gulfstream G-650, HondaJet, Embraer Phenom 300, UTAS TacSAR pod, S-92 helicopter, MH-60S mine countermeasure helicopter, AH-1Z ZULU attack helicopter, MH-53, CH-53, C-5A Galaxy and the Embraer E2-175 regional airliner.

We are a subcontractor for leading defense prime contractors such as Northrop Grumman Corporation (“NGC”), Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”), Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, a Lockheed company (“Sikorsky”), Bell Helicopter (“Bell”), Raytheon and United Technologies Aerospace Systems (“UTAS”). 56%, 46% and 57% of our revenue in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was generated by subcontracts with defense prime contractors. Our 2016 defense subcontractor revenue was significantly decreased because of the change in estimate on the A-10 program, described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MDA”).

We also operate as a subcontractor to prime commercial contractors, including Sikorsky, Honda Aircraft Company, Inc. (“Honda”), Embraer S.A. (“Embraer”) and The Triumph Group (“Triumph”), in the production of commercial aircraft parts. 36%, 50% and 42% of our revenue in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was generated by commercial contract sales.

CPI Aero has over 3743 years of experience as a contractor. Most members of our management team have held management positions at large aerospace contractors, including NGC and GKN Aerospace (“GKN”). Our technical team possesses extensive technical expertise, program and programsupply chain management, and integration capabilities. Our competitive advantage lies in our ability to offer large contractor capabilities with the flexibility and responsiveness of a small company, while staying competitive in cost and delivering superior quality products.

CPI Aero was incorporated under the laws of the State of New York in January 1980 under the name Composite Products International, Inc. CPI Aero changed its name to Consortium of Precision Industries, Inc. in April 1989 and to CPI Aerostructures, Inc. in July 1992. In January 2005, we began doing business under the name CPI Aero®, a registered trademark of the Company. Our principal office is located at 91 Heartland Blvd., Edgewood, New York 11717 and our telephone number is (631) 586-5200.

We maintain a website located at www.cpiaero.com.www.cpiaero.com. Our corporate filings, including our Annual ReportReports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statements and reports filed by our officers and directors under Section 16-(a)16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and any amendments to those filings, are available, free of charge, on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend for information contained inSEC. The contents of our website are not incorporated in or otherwise to be regarded as a part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

History

Conceived and started as a technical consulting firm on January 11, 1980, within a few years, Composite Products International Inc. (“CPI”) was manufacturing aircraft structural components for U.S. military aircraft under contract to the U.S. Government. By the late 1980s, CPI was also providing structural components for civil aircraft in the commercial market.

In the 1990s, CPI became a publicly traded company and changed its name to CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (“CPI Aero”). The Company continued to grow, both in size and in its business. U.S. Government contracts served as the mainstay of CPI Aero’s business, and the Company continued to grow its presence in the commercial market as well. Commitment to customer satisfaction and pride in a job well done propelled CPI Aero to the forefront as a reputable and hardworking supplier to OEMs.

On September 5, 2000, CPI Aero shares were listed on the American Stock Exchange (now known as NYSE American). We also started to focus on diversifying our business model to pursue more commercial contracts. In 2007, the Company won three major contracts and experienced great growth and expansion.

Significant Contracts

In 2018, CPI Aero acquired Welding Metallurgy Inc. This allowed for a small but strategically important amount of vertical integration in complex fusion welding and large diameter tube bending capability. The acquisition included Miller Stuart and Compac Development Corp., two other business lines that added fabrication of electrical cables, harnesses and enclosures to the Company’s capabilities.

Some

Today, CPI Aero continues to engage in traditional high quality structural assembly manufacturing while incorporating the latest in technology to improve quality and streamline production. Our success is rooted in our core company values, the dedication and skill of our significant contracts are as follows:employees, and our commitment to providing our customers the full-service solution they require.

Military Aircraft – Subcontracts with Prime ContractorsProducts and Services

E-2D “Advanced Hawkeye” The NGC E-2 Hawkeye is an all-weather, carrier-based tactical Airborne Early Warning aircraft. The twin turboprop aircraft was designedWe offer design, engineering, manufacture, build, MRO services, and developed in the 1950s by the Grumman Aircraft Company for the United States Navy as a replacement for the E-1 Tracer. The United States Navy aircraft has been progressively updated with the latest variant, the E-2D, first flying in 2007. In 2008, we received an initial $7.9 million order from NGC to provide structural kits used in the production of Outer Wing Panels (“OWP”) of the E-2D. We initially valued the long-term agreement at approximately $98 million over an eight-year period, with the potential to be in excess of $195 million over the life of the aircraft program. The cumulative orders we have received on this program through January 2018 exceed $147 million.

In addition, in 2015 we won an award to supply structural components and kits for the Outer Wing Panel (“OWP”) on the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning and control (“AEW&C”) aircraft that will be manufactured for Japan. We are responsible for component source selection, supply chain management, delivery of kits, and are providingkitting services capabilities to the A&D industry as follows:

Engineering Services and Capabilities

As a build-to-print structural component manufacturer, CPI Aero’s engineering focus is on executing customer contracts through product realization, and to support collaborative design development using design for manufacturing engineering services to NGC during the integration of the components into the OWP. The contract from NGC is valued at between $25 million and $30 million.

UH-60 “BLACK HAWK” The UH-60 BLACK HAWK helicopter is the leader in multi-mission-type aircraft. Among the mission configurations its serves are troop transport, medical evacuation, electronic warfare, attack, assault supportassembly (“DFMA”), geometric dimensioning & tolerancing (“GD&T”), and special operations. More than 3,000 BLACK HAWK helicopters are in use today, operating in 29 countries. We have long-term agreements from Sikorsky to manufacture gunner window assemblies, fuel panel assemblies, and perform MRO on stabilators for the BLACK HAWK helicopter through 2022.

F-16 “Fighting Falcon” The Lockheed Martin Fighting Falcon is a single-engine multirole fighter aircraft. Originally developed by General Dynamics for the USAF, over 2,900 F-16 aircraft are flown by the USAF and by air forces around the world today.tooling concept support. Although not vertically integrated, CPI Aero has a contract with UTASdeep well of experience on various types of detail part manufacturing that allows us to manufacture pod structuresprovide detailed design for the DB-110 reconnaissance system, which is used primarily on exported F-16 aircraft.

Next Generation Jamming Pod The next generation jamming pod is an external jamming pod that will disrupt and degrade enemy aircraft and ground radar and communication systems and will replace the ALQ-99 system on the US Navy's EA-6B Growler carrier-based electronic warfare aircraft. The US Navy plans to install these pods on 138 EA-18G Growlersmanufacturing input during the production phase. There are 2 pods per aircraft. Raytheon receiveddesign refinement process.

We have significant experience working in a $1 billion sole source contract from the US Navy in April 2016,full model-based definition environment, both CATIA and CPI has a contract with RaytheonNX, due to assemble the pod structural housing and air management system.

UTAS TacSAR Podour long sustainment support on older airframes. CPI Aero receivedalso possesses the capability to work with traditional blueprints, mylars and loft. The Company has executed several projects where older engineering data sets were “rehabilitated” to fully model-based datasets per customers’ requests.

CPI Aero is capable and has experience in designing many types of assembly type tools up to and including large floor mounted, articulated tooling at high levels of precision. We are also capable of designing various types of tooling that can be 3D printed for rapid response. Understanding our customers’ product performance needs and combining product GD&T layout and final tooling definitions and requirements helps us maximize product realization success.

Overall, CPI Aero’s engineering team is dedicated to providing our customers an experience where our activities are an extension of their business and complement their engineering goals.

Business Strategy

CPI Aero is committed to achieving revenue, gross profit margin, and earnings growth through the successful implementation of our business development strategy. CPI Aero’s future strategic direction is tied to aerostructures, aerosystems, supply chain, and kitting services, and a $600,000 contract to begin engineeringdeeper market penetration of formerly acquired businesses in 2017welding, tube bending, wire harnesses, and expects to receive an initialelectronics. To accomplish this strategy, we are focused on executing on our current customer programs while pursuing new aerospace build-to-print opportunities - in both new production orderand MRO statements of work.

We believe that there has been a shift in the first halfmarket for more build-to-print contracts by OEMs versus the recent past trend of 2018. The contract is sole-sourcedesign and build contracts. This trend fits in well with CPI Aero’s strengths. In addition, we expect to identify and close contracts for which we can provide more value added content to our customer (like integrating sub-assemblies into higher level Aerostructures and Aerosystems statements of work) and we intend to pursue statements of work that require proportionately higher CPI and valued at approximately $35 million. The work being performed by CPI is similar to work performed during the pre-production phaseAero value added content.

Another tenet of the DB-110 Reconnaissance Pod we currently manufacture for UTAS. CPI Aero business development strategy is portfolio reshaping of our existing business by identifying and closing long-term agreements or multi-year contracts, which provides an opportunity to firm-up supplier agreements and secure supplier capacity.

The TacSAR pod system complementsfinal element of CPI Aero’s business development strategy is to build upon the DB-110 systemCompany’s existing customer relationships and to provide all-weather reconnaissancedevelop relationships with new customers. We intend to increase customer engagements by deploying our business development personnel to solidify existing customer relationships which have been established by performance excellence, transparency and surveillancetrust over many years and will contain some structural components commonmultiple programs. We have also added additional resources to the DB-110 reconnaissance pod.our business development function to cultivate new relationships with new customers.

F-35 Lightning II The F-35 Lightning II is a family of single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole fighters designed to perform ground attack, aerial reconnaissance, and air defense missions. The Department of Defense plans to acquire over 2,400 F-35's by 2034 and 11 other countries also have plans to acquire the aircraft. In 2015, CPI was awarded a multi-year contract to supply lock assemblies for the arresting gear door on the F-35A CTOL, estimated at up to $10.6 million. CPI made its first delivery under that contract in May 2017. In November 2017, CPI was awarded an additional $15.8 million multi-year contract to manufacture canopy activation drive shaft assemblies for the F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C aircraft. 

Commercial Aircraft – Subcontracts with Prime Contractors

Gulfstream G650 In March 2008, Spirit Aerosystems (“Spirit”) awarded us a contract to provide leading edges for the Gulfstream G650 business jet, a commercial program that Spirit was supporting. In December 2014, Spirit transferred its work-scope on this program to Triumph. We will continue to provide leading edges formake sure each customer has the G650 as our purchase orders and long-term agreement have transferred to Triumph.

HondaJetIn May 2011, Honda awarded usbest possible buying experience, by ensuring we are a contract to manufacture engine inlets forbest value partner through the HondaJet advanced light business jet. We have received approximately $30.5 million in ordersdelivery of high quality products delivered on this program through December 2017. We estimate the potential value of this program to be approximately $70 million.

Embraer Phenom 300 In May 2012, Embraer awarded us a contract to manufacture engine inlets for the Embraer Phenom 300 business jet. We have received approximately $32.9 million in orders on this program through December 2017. We estimate the potential value of the program to be in excess of $40 million.

Cessna Citation X In November 2012, Cessna Aircraft Company (“Cessna”) awarded us a contract to supply structural assemblies, predominately wing spars, for Cessna’s flagship aircraft, the newly-relaunched Cessna Citation X. We have received approximately $10.4 million in orders on this program.

S-92 Helicoptertime. The S-92 helicopter performs search and rescue missions, heads of state missions, and a variety of transportation missions for offshore oil and gas crews, utility, and airline passengers. Sikorsky has delivered more than 275 S-92 helicopters since 2004. In 2017, CPI announced a follow-on contract with Sikorsky to provide 15 different deliverable items for the S-92 helicopter, including door assemblies, cover assemblies, and various installation kits used by Sikorsky to complete final assembly of the S-92 helicopter.

Military Aircraft – Prime Contracts with U.S. Government

F-16 “Fighting Falcon” In November 2014, The Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) awarded CPI Aero team will always work in a multi-year contractcollaborative way to provide structural wing componentsmeet customers’ needs and logistical support for global F-16 aircraft MRO operations. We estimate the value of the contract, including options, to be approximately $53.5 million.solve their problems.

T-38C Pacer Classic III In September 2017, the companyreceived purchase orders valued at approximately $2 million from the USAF to provide structural modification kits for the T-38C Pacer Classic III aircraft structural modification program.

Sales and Marketing

We are recognized within the aerospace industry as a Tier 1 or Tier 2 supplier to major aircraft suppliers. Additionally, we may bid for military contracts set aside specifically for small businesses.

We are awarded contracts for our products and services through the process of competitive bidding. This process begins when we first learn, formally or otherwise, of a potential contract from a prospective customer and concludes after all negotiations are completed upon award. When preparing our response to a prospective customer for a potential contract, we evaluate the contract requirements and determine and outline the services and products we can provide to fulfill the contract at a competitiveprice. Each contract also benefits from various additional services that we offer, including program management, engineering, andglobal supply chain program management, which streamlines the vendor management and procurement process and monitors the progress, timing, and quality of component delivery.

Our average sales cycle, which generally commences at the time a prospective customer issues a request for proposal and ends upon delivery of the final product to the customer, varies widely.

Because of the complexities inherent in the aerospace industry, the time from the initial request for proposal to award ranges from as little as a few weeks to several years. Additionally, our contracts have ranged from six months to as long as ten years. Also, repeat and follow-on jobs for current contracts frequently provide additional opportunities with minimal start-up costs and rapid rates to production.

The Market

We have positioned ourthe Company to take advantage of opportunities in the military aerospace market but to a broad customer base, thereby reducing the impact of direct government contracting limitations. Our success as a subcontractor to defense prime contractors has provided us with opportunities to also act as a subcontractor to prime contractors in the production of commercial aircraft structures, which also reduced our exposure to government spending decisions.structures.

Over time, our Company has expanded in both incapabilities and size, and capabilities, withas evidenced by our growth in our operational, and global supply chain management, program management.management, and engineering capabilities, as well as the growth in our manufacturing shop floor size and equipment base. These expansions have allowedprovided us the ability to supply larger and more complex aerostructure assembliesAerostructures and aerosystems and structuresAerosystems products in support of our government-based programs as well as to pursue opportunities within the commercial and business jet markets. Our capabilities have also allowed us to acquireobtain MRO, kitting, tube bending, welding, and kittingelectronics related contracts.

Approximately $3.1 million, $8.7 million and $9.9 million of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was from customers outside the U.S. All other revenue for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 has been attributable to customers within the U.S. We have no assets outside the U.S. Government-based contracts are subject to national defense budget and procurement funding decisions which, accordingly, drives demand for our business in that market. Government spending and budgeting for procurement, operations and maintenance are affected not only by military action, but also the related fiscal consequences of these actions, as well as the political process.

Competition

Backlog

We produce custom assemblies pursuant to long-term contracts and customer purchase orders. Backlog consists of aggregate values under such contracts and purchase orders, excluding the portion previously included in operating revenues on the basis of percentage of completion accounting, and including estimates of future contract price escalation. Substantially all of our backlog is subject to termination at will and rescheduling, without significant penalty. Funds are often appropriated for programs or contracts on a yearly or quarterly basis, even though the contract may call for performance that is expected to take a number of years. Therefore, our funded backlog does not include the full value of our contracts. Our total backlog as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

Approximately 78% of the total amount of our backlog atDecember 31, 2017was attributable to government contracts. Our backlog attributable to government contracts atDecember 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

Our backlog attributable to commercial contracts atDecember 31, 2017and 2016 was as follows:

Our unfunded backlog is primarily comprised of the long-term contracts that we received from Spirit and NGC during 2008, Honda and Bell during 2011 and Cessna, Sikorsky and Embraer during 2012. These long-term contracts are expected to have yearly orders which will be funded in the future.

Approximately 38% of the funded backlog at December 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized as revenue during 2018.

Material and Parts

We subcontract production of substantially all parts incorporated into our products to third party manufacturers under firm fixed price orders. Our decision to purchase certain components generally is based upon whether the components are available to meet required specifications at a cost and with a delivery schedule consistent with customer requirements. From time to time, we are required to purchase custom made parts from sole suppliers and manufacturers in order to meet specific customer requirements.

We obtain our raw materials from several commercial sources. Although certain items are only available from limited sources of supply, we believe that the loss of any single supplier would not have a material adverse effect on our business.

Competition

We face competition in our role as both a prime contractor to the U.S. Government and as a Tier 1 or Tier 2 subcontractor to military and commercial aircraft manufacturers. With respect to Aerostructures products, we often compete against much larger Tier 1 suppliers, such as Triumph Group, Spirit Aerosystems, Kaman Aerospace, GKN Aerospace, Ducommun, and LMI Aerospace. We believe that we can compete effectively with these larger companies by delivering products with the same level of quality and performance at a better value for our customer. With respect to Aerosystems products, such as our portfolio of EW and ISR integrated pod structures, we find more limited competition and are not aware of competition from any of the Aerostructures companies mentioned above. In these cases, we typically compete with the internal manufacturing arm of our customers. We believe our unique skills related to integrated pod structures combined with a very efficient and generally much lower cost structure create a competitive advantage for bidding on Aerosystems contracts.

For certain unrestricted contracts for the U.S. Government, we may compete against well-established prime contractors, including NGC,Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing. All of these competitors possess significantly larger infrastructures, greater resources and the capabilities to respond to much larger contracts. We believe that our competitive advantage lies in our ability to offer large contractor capabilities with the flexibility and responsiveness of a small company, while staying competitive in cost and delivering superior quality products. While larger prime contractors compete for significant modification awards, they generally do not compete for awards in smaller modifications, spares and replacement parts, even for aircraft for which they are the original manufacturer. In certain instances, the large prime contractors often subcontract much of the work they win to their Tier 1 suppliers so we also may act as a subcontractor to some ofthem in these major prime contractors. Further,situations. Furthermore, in some cases these companiesprime contractors are not permitted to bid, for example when the U.S. Government designates a contract as a Small Business Set-Aside. In these restricted contracts for the U.S. Government, CPI Aero typically competes against numerous small business competitors. We believe we compete effectively against the smaller competitors because smaller competitors generally do not have theof our 40 years of experience and expertise we have in responding to requests for proposals for government contracts.

Our Customers

Approximately $6.0 million and $6.1 million of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were from customers outside the U.S. All other revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 has been attributable to customers within the U.S. We have no assets outside the U.S.

We have positioned our Company to take advantage of opportunities in the military aerospace market to a broad customer base, which we believe will reduce the potential impact of industry consolidation. Our success as a subcontractor to defense prime contractors has provided us with opportunities to also act as a subcontractor to prime contractors in the production of commercial aircraft structures, which we believe will also reduce our exposure to defense industry consolidation, government spending decisions, and other defense industry risks.

Our OEM customers in the defense sector include leading prime defense contractors such as:

81% and 82% of our revenue in 2023 and 2022, respectively, was generated by subcontracts with defense prime contractors.

Our OEM customers in the civil aviation market include:

5% and 7% of our revenue in 2023 and 2022, respectively, was generated by commercial contract sales.

CPI Aero also is a prime contractor to the DOD, primarily through contracts nordirectly with the USAF and the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), providing supply chain management, assembly & integration, and kitting services for the F-16 and T-38 programs. 14% and 10% of our revenue in 2023 and 2022, respectively, were generated by direct government sales.

Significant Contracts

Our most significant contracts are described below:

Military Aircraft – Subcontracts with Prime Contractors

E-2D Advanced Hawkeye: The NGC E-2D Advanced Hawkeye is an all-weather, carrier-based tactical Airborne Early Warning aircraft. The twin turboprop aircraft was designed and developed in the 1950s by the Grumman Aircraft Company for the U.S. Navy. The U.S. Navy aircraft has been progressively updated with the latest variant, the E-2D, first flying in 2007. In 2008, we received an initial $7.9 million order from NGC to provide structural kits used in the production of Outer Wing Panels (“OWP”) of the E-2D. We initially valued the long-term agreement at approximately $98 million over an eight-year period, with the potential to be in excess of $195 million over the life of the aircraft program. In February of 2019, we announced a new multi-year award valued at up to approximately $47.5 million. In June 2020, we announced that we had received firm orders valued in excess of $43 million and $5 million in long-lead funding in anticipation of purchase orders for OWP structural components and kits. In 2021, we received additional orders valued at approximately $11 million. Since 2008, the cumulative orders we have received on this program through December 31, 2023 exceed $209 million. We anticipate shipping against these orders into 2025.

In addition, in 2015 we won an award to supply structural components and kits for the Wet Outer Wing Panel (“WOWP”) on the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning and control (“AEW&C”) aircraft that will they typically havebe manufactured for the Japan Air Self Defense Force (“JASDF”). We are responsible for component source selection, supply chain management, delivery of kits, and providing manufacturing engineering services to NGC during the integration of the components into the WOWP E-2D. In late 2019, CPI Aero received additional WOWP kit requirements increasing the total value of this program for the JASDF to be in excess of $20 million. CPI completed deliveries in support of this contract in 2023.

In February 2020, the Company’s subsidiary WMI received approximately $4 million in purchase orders from NGC to produce numerous welded structures and tubes for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye. Under the terms of the purchase orders, WMI manufactured more than 35 years140 different items in support of past performancethe production of at least 25 E-2D aircraft. CPI received follow-on orders for additional quantities of welded products in conducting more2023 and anticipates additional orders in 2024.

ALQ-249 Next Generation Jammer – Mid-Band Pod (“NGJ-MB”): The Raytheon NGJ-MB pod is an external jamming pod that will disrupt and degrade enemy aircraft and ground radar and communication systems, and will replace the ALQ-99 system on the U.S. Navy’s EA-6B Growler carrier-based electronic warfare aircraft. The U.S. Navy plans to install these pods on 139 EA-18G Growlers during the production phase. There are two pods per aircraft. There are also 11 EA-18Gs operated by the Royal Australian Air Force. Raytheon received a $1 billion sole source contract from the U.S. Navy in April 2016, and CPI Aero has a contract with Raytheon to assemble the pod structural housing and air management system (“AMS”) and integrate customer furnished equipment. In 2019, Raytheon authorized CPI Aero to begin production of pod structures and AMS components for the System Demonstration and Test Article (“SDTA”) phase of the NGJ-MB program. All SDTA pods and AMS components orders received were valued in excess of $60 million and completed delivery as of December 31, 2022.

On November 16, 2021 the Company announced it was authorized by Raytheon to start the production phase of the program. The Company was awarded low rate production (“LRIP”) I and II orders valued at approximately $18.5 million. LRIP III, for which the Company was awarded an order of approximately $14.0 million in October 2022, and later definitized at $32.5 million. In November 2023, RTX issued a Memorandum for Record for Lot4 with an anticipated Program Value of $32 million and an initial funding limit of $16 million. We believe that the total value of the NGJ-MB program through production will be in excess of $210 million through 2030.

A-10 Thunderbolt II “Warthog”: The Boeing A-10 Thunderbolt II, also known as the Warthog, is a twin-engine aircraft that provides close-air support of ground forces and employs a wide variety of conventional munitions including general-purpose bombs. This simple, effective and survivable single-seat aircraft can be used against all ground targets, including tanks and other armored vehicles. On August 21, 2019, Boeing announced that it had received an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract award from the USAF with a maximum contract value of $999 million to manage the production of up to 112 new wing sets and spares kits for A-10 aircraft, and the USAF ordered 27 wing sets from Boeing immediately at contract award. In 2019, CPI Aero announced the receipt of an IDIQ contract with a maximum ceiling value of $48 million from Boeing for structural assemblies for the A-10. Under the terms of the IDIQ contract, CPI Aero will manufacture major structural subassemblies of the A-10 aircraft’s wing. The Company also announced that it had received initial purchase orders under the IDIQ contract valued at approximately $6 million for the production of four shipsets of assemblies and associated program start-up costs. In May 2020, CPI Aero announced the receipt of additional purchase orders totaling approximately $14 million from Boeing. In March of 2022, CPI Aero announced the receipt of additional purchase orders totaling approximately $3.2 million, bringing the total purchase orders received to $23.4 million.

F-35 Lightning II: The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is a family of single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole fighter aircraft that provides unmatched multi-role capability, survivability, and connectivity with data sharing capabilities essential for joint all-domain operations. Current DOD plans call for acquiring a total of 2,456 F-35s. U.S. allies are expected to purchase hundreds of additional F-35s, with eight nations participating as cost-sharing partners in the program with the United States, and six other nations allied with the U.S. purchasing the F-35 via foreign military sales agreements with the DOD. In 2015, CPI Aero was awarded a multi-year contract to supply four different lock assemblies for the arresting gear door on the F-35C Carrier Take Off and Landing variant. CPI Aero made its first delivery under that contract in May 2017. In 2018, the Company received a new long-term agreement valued at approximately $8 million for lock assemblies to be delivered between 2020 and 2024. In November 2017, CPI Aero was awarded an additional $15.8 million multi-year contract to manufacture canopy activation drive shaft assemblies for the F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C variants.

UH-60 “BLACK HAWK”: The Sikorsky UH-60 BLACK HAWK helicopter is the leader in multi-mission rotary wing aircraft. Among the mission configurations it serves are troop transport, medical evacuation, electronic warfare, attack, assault support, and special operations. More than 20004,000 BLACK HAWK helicopters are in use today, operating in 29 countries. CPI Aero manufactures several different structural assemblies, including welded structure for the BLACK HAWK. The majority of CPI Aero’s contracts for the BLACK HAWK are as a Tier 1 supplier to Sikorsky. The Company also is a Tier 2 supplier to GKN Aerospace for products ultimately used on the BLACK HAWK. In 2017, CPI Aero received an approximately $21 million long-term agreement through 2022 for the production of fuel panel assemblies, work it has performed for Sikorsky since 2010. Also in 2017, the Company received an $8 million long-term agreement through 2022 to manufacture machine gunner window assemblies for the BLACK HAWK, continuing work it has performed since 2010. A third five-year long-term agreement was awarded in January 2022, also for gunner window assemblies, estimated at $13.6 million with a period of performance from 2023-2027. Also, since October 2018, CPI Aero has received multiple purchase orders totaling $22 million for hover infrared suppression system (“HIRSS”) module assemblies for use as spares on older variants of the BLACK HAWK. The HIRSS is a defensive countermeasures system that is integral to the survival of the BLACK HAWK by reducing the opportunity for an infrared-seeking threat system to acquire, lock onto, track, and destroy the aircraft. Finally, in May 2021, the Company announced receiving a multi-year contract valued at up to $17.2 million for the repair and overhaul of outboard stabilator assemblies in support of the Sikorsky MH-60 SEAHAWK.

F-16V Fighting Falcon: The Lockheed Martin F-16 is the world’s most successful, combat-proven multirole fighter. Approximately 3,000 operational F-16s are in service today in 25 countries. The F-16V is a new variant, sold exclusively to international air forces and is the most technologically advanced fourth generation fighter in the world. In 2019, the Company announced it had been awarded a multi-year contract by Lockheed Martin to manufacture rudder island and drag chute canister (“RI/DCC”) assemblies for the F-16V. The RI/DCC is a large structural sub-assembly that is installed on the tail section of the aircraft. Deliveries began in 2021 and will continue through 2024. In June 2020, the Company announced that it had been awarded an order from Lockheed Martin as part of the previously announced multi-year contract to manufacture RI/DCC assemblies for new production F-16 Block 70/72 aircraft, in March 2021 the Company announced that it had received an additional order for these assemblies for $9.2 million and in November 2022, the Company announced another follow-on order for these assemblies for $4 million. On August 28, 2023 CPI announced the receipt of a 2nd Multiyear long-term agreement with not-to-exceed funding of $34.4M. The total value of the RI/DCC program, including both multi-year contracts is approximately $59.3 million.

CH-53K King Stallion: The CH-53K is a heavy-lift helicopter being developed by Sikorsky for the U.S. Government.Marine Corps. We manufacture composite electronics racks as a Tier 2 supplier to Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., the manufacturer of the CH-53K cockpit and cabin. Through December 31, 2023, we had received orders valued at more than $2.7 million from Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.

In addition, the Company also manufactures welded tubes for the CH-53K as a Tier 1 supplier to Sikorsky. In August 2023, CPI received a Long-term Agreement with a ceiling price of $17.4 million and a funding limit of $7.3 million. These tubes will be required for the multi-year on this program. A component of this statement of work also includes CPI Aero intellectual property.

Undisclosed Pod Structure: In 2019, the Company received an initial purchase order from Raytheon to manufacture pod structures for an undisclosed application. The value of the order was approximately $2.3 million for manufacturing engineering services, development of assembly tooling, and the production of the prototypes. The undisclosed pod structure is currently under development. In October 2021, the Company announced that Raytheon awarded the Company an approximately $6.1 million contract modification that changes the scope of work the Company would perform and increases the quantity of pods to be produced. The program value as of December 31, 2023 was $8.4 million.

Undisclosed Vehicle: In 2018, the Company started production of a welded tank for NGC for an undisclosed application on an undisclosed platform. The total value of orders received as of December 31, 2023 is $3.2 million.

B-52 Radar Rack: In late 2021, the Company received an initial purchase order from Raytheon to manufacture radar rack structures for the B-52 Radar Modernization Program. The value of the order was approximately $4.0 million for manufacturing engineering services, development of assembly tooling, and the production of the initial units. The non-recurring and tooling phase of the program was completed and the initial 11 racks will be delivered in 2024.

Military Aircraft – Prime Contracts with U.S. Government

T-38 Pacer Classic III, Phase 2: For more than 50 years, the NGC T-38 has been the principal supersonic jet trainer used by the USAF. The T-38C Pacer Classic III Fuselage Structural Modification Kit Integration program (“PC III”) and the Talon Repair Inspection and Maintenance (“TRIM”) program are expected to increase the structural service life of the T-38 beyond 2030. In 2015, CPI Aero was awarded Phase 2 of PC III and has received purchase orders valued at approximately $2.0 million from the USAF to provide structural modification kits for the PC III aircraft structural modification program.

T-38 Pacer Classic III, Phase 3 and TRIM: In July 2019, the Company announced a new $65.7 million IDIQ contract from the USAF for the final phase of PC III as well as TRIM. The TRIM program is a separate USAF structural modification effort that will extend the structural service life of T-38A and T-38 model types, as well as T-38C models that were not modified during PC III. Through December 31, 2020, the Company had received orders valued at approximately $15.3 million for the PC III, Phase 3 and TRIM programs, and in 2021, the Company announced it had received three separate orders for additional requirements valued at approximately $16.2 million. Through December 2023, CPI has received funded orders under this long term agreement totaling $48.3 million.

Commercial Aircraft – Subcontracts with Prime Contractors

Embraer Phenom 300: The Phenom 300 is a twin-engine, executive jet produced by Brazilian aircraft company Embraer that can carry between six and ten passengers and a crew of two. We have been producing engine inlet assemblies for Embraer under a long-term agreement we entered into in 2012. In January 2024, we celebrated the delivery of the 800th Shipset of Inlets. In 2023, we received funded orders totaling $4.4 million.

Backlog

We produce custom assemblies pursuant to long-term contracts and customer purchase orders. Funded backlog consists of aggregate funded values under such contracts and purchase orders, excluding the portion previously included in operating revenues pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”). Unfunded backlog is the estimated amount of future orders under the expected duration of the program. Substantially all of our unfunded backlog is subject to termination at will and rescheduling, without significant penalty. Funds are often appropriated for programs or contracts on a yearly or quarterly basis, even though the contract may call for performance that is expected to take a number of years. Therefore, our funded backlog does not include the full value of our contracts.

The total backlog at December 31, 2023 is $513,351,000.

Our total backlog as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows: 

Approximately 97% and 98% of the total amount of our backlog at December 31, 2023 and 2022 was attributable to government contracts. Our backlog attributable to government contracts at December 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:

Our backlog attributable to commercial contracts at December 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:

Material and Parts

We also competesubcontract production of substantially all parts incorporated into our products to third-party manufacturers under firm fixed price orders. Our decision to purchase certain components generally is based upon whether the components are available to meet required specifications at the Tier 1a cost and Tier 2 levels for work for major subcontracts with OEMsa delivery schedule consistent with customer requirements. From time to time, we are required to purchase custom made parts from sole suppliers and manufacturers in both the military andorder to meet specific customer requirements.

We obtain our raw materials from several commercial markets. We often compete against much larger Tier 1 suppliers, such as Triumph Group, Spirit AeroSystems, Kaman Aerospace, GKN, Ducommun, LMI Aerospace, and Precision Castparts Corp. Wesources. Although certain items are only available from limited sources of supply, we believe that we can compete effectively with these larger companies by delivering products with the same levelloss of quality and performance atany single supplier would not have a better value formaterial adverse effect on our customer.business.

Government Regulation

Environmental Regulation

We are subject to regulations administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, various state, agencies and county, and local authoritiesagencies acting in cooperation with federal and state authorities. Among other things, these regulatory bodies impose restrictions to control air, soil, and water pollution, to protect against occupational exposure to chemicals, including health and safety risks, and to require notification or reporting of the storage, use, and release of certain hazardous chemicals and substances. The extensive regulatory framework imposes compliance burdens and risks on us. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these regulations and to obtain injunctions or impose civil and criminal fines in the case of violations.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) imposes strict, joint and several liability on the present and former owners and operators of facilities that release hazardous substances into the environment. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”) regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. In New York State, the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances are governed by the Environmental Conservation Law, which contains the New York counterparts of CERCLA and RCRA. In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which requires employers to provide a place of employment that is free from recognized and preventable hazards that are likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, obligates employers to provide notice to employees regarding the presence of hazardous chemicals and to train employees in the use of such substances.

Our operations require the use of a limited amount of chemicals and other materials for painting and cleaning, including solvents and thinners, which are classified under applicable laws as hazardous chemicals and substances. We follow all federal, state and local rules and regulations regarding the disposal of these chemicals and associated waste. We have obtained a permit from the Town of Islip, New York, Building Division in order to maintain a paint booth containing flammable liquids.

Federal Aviation Administration Regulation

We are subject to regulation by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) under the provisions of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended. The FAA prescribes standards and licensing requirements for aircraft and aircraft components. We are subject to inspections by the FAA and may be subjected to fines and other penalties (including orders to cease production) for noncompliance with FAA regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in the termination of or our disqualification from some of our contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Government Contract Compliance

Our government contracts and sub-contracts are subject to the procurement rules and regulations of the U.S. Government. Many of the contract terms are dictated by these rules and regulations. Specifically, cost-based pricing is determined under the Federal Acquisition RegulationsRegulation (“FAR”), which provide guidance on the types of costs that are allowable in establishing prices for goods and services under U.S. Government contracts. For example, costs such as those related to charitable contributions, advertising, interest expense, and public relations are unallowable, and therefore not recoverable through sales. During and after the fulfillment of a government contract, we may be audited in respect of the direct and allocated indirect costs attributed thereto. These audits may result in adjustments to our contract costs. Additionally, we may be subject to U.S. Government inquiries and investigations because of our participation in government procurement. Any inquiry or investigation can result in fines or limitations on our ability to continue to bid for government contracts and fulfill existing contracts. We believe that we are in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing our operations and have obtained all material licenses and permits required for the operation of our business.

The U.S. Government generally has the ability to terminate our contracts, in whole or in part, without prior notice, for convenience or for default based on performance. If a U.S. Government contract were to be terminated for convenience, we generally would be protected by provisions covering reimbursement for costs incurred on the contract and profit on those costs, but not the anticipated profit that would have been earned had the contract been completed. In the unusual circumstance where a U.S. Government contract does not have such termination protection, we attempt to mitigate the termination risk through other means. Termination resulting from our default may expose us to liability and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for other contracts. The U.S. Government also has the ability to stop work under a contract for a limited period of time for its convenience. In the event of a stop work order, we generally would be protected by provisions covering reimbursement for costs incurred on the contract to date and for costs associated with the temporary stoppage of work on the contract. However, such temporary stoppages and delays could introduce inefficiencies for which we may not be able to negotiate full recovery from the U.S. Government, and could ultimately result in termination for convenience or reduced future orders on certain contracts. Additionally, we may be required to continue to perform for some period of time on certain of our U.S. Government contracts, even if the U.S. Government is unable to make timely payments.

Insurance

We maintain a $2$2.0 million general liability insurance policy, a $100 million products liability insurance policy, and a $5$5.0 million umbrella liability insurance policy. Additionally, we maintain a $10$10.0 million of director and officers’ insurance policy.liability insurance. We believe this coverage is adequate for claims that have been and may be brought against us, and for the types of products presently marketed because of the strict inspection standards imposed on us by our customers before they take possession of our products. Additionally, the FAR generally provide that we will not be held liable for any loss of or damage to property of the U.S. Government that occurs after the U.S. Government accepts delivery of our products and that results from any defects or deficiencies in our products unless the liability results from willful misconduct or lack of good faith on the part of our managerial personnel.

Proprietary Information

None of our current assembly processes or products is protected by patents. We rely on proprietary know-how and information and employ various methods to protect the processes, concepts, ideas, and documentation associated with our products. These methods, however, may not afford complete protection and there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop such processes, concepts, ideas, and documentation.

CPI Aero® is a registered trademark of the Company.

EmployeesHuman Capital Management

Our ability to attract, develop and retain top talent across all of our business functions, and particularly in highly technical areas, has a significant impact on organizational success. Accordingly, our human capital management strategy places a significant focus on both attracting a diverse, highly skilled workforce and engaging and developing talent from within by creating a work environment that promotes inclusion and equitability. By providing our valued employees the opportunity to enhance their skillsets, develop their careers and pursue excellence through numerous training and development opportunities, we consistently emphasize the importance of innovation and continuous improvement throughout our organization. We continue to pursue opportunities that enable us to build our talent pipeline, particularly for skilled labor, including running an apprentice training program several times over the course of the year and forging relationships with local high school and trade schools.

We attract and compensate our employees by offering a competitive total rewards package which includes benefits, resources, and programs that support health, physical, mental, and financial wellness. The benefits package we offer, coupled with employee recognition opportunities and employee engagement activities help create a comprehensive employee experience. We periodically benchmark our benefits programs and associated costs to remain competitive.

As of March 9, 2018,December 31, 2023, we had 230203 full-time employees. Weemployees as compared to 208 full-time employees as of December 31, 2022. On an as-needed basis, we employ temporary personnel with specialized disciplines on an as-needed basis. None of ourto fill staffing gaps. We do not have any employees are members ofrepresented by a union. Weunion, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good. We provide our team members with ongoing opportunities to share thoughts and perspectives on company and employment-related matters through surveys, all-hands meetings, and management open door policies. Our management, with oversight from the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of our board of directors, monitors the hiring, retention, and management of our employees and regularly conducts succession planning to ensure that we continue to cultivate the pipeline of talent needed to operate our business.

Diversity and Inclusion

We value diversity and inclusion in our workforce as we understand that diversity of background, thought, and experience leads to greater innovation and improved business results. We are committed to increasing and retaining diversity at all levels of our workforce, and focus on diversity and inclusion throughout our recruitment, hiring, and onboarding processes. Over the last year, we have increased diversity on our board of directors to 29% up from 17% in 2022. Our executive management team is comprised of 40% diverse employees.

Across our total employee population and based on employees who self-identify, as of December 31, 2023, approximately 21% of our workforce are female, 34% are multicultural and 5% are veterans.

Safety

Ensuring the safety and well-being of our employees is a top priority. The goal of our safety program is to increase safety knowledge and awareness throughout the organization to ensure occupational health, reduce risk, and prevent incidents. We regularly benchmark our safety performance, self-audit our safety compliance, and provide our employees with safety-related training. We conduct an investigation, including root cause analysis and corrective action, any time a safety incident or a near miss occurs.

Our Safety Committee is comprised of employees from various disciplines throughout the organization who meet on a regular basis to execute continuous improvement strategies, develop methods to increase ownership of safety throughout the organization, establish new safety initiatives, and assess safety performance.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

We monitor the effectiveness of our safety program by comparing recordable incidents and incident severity year over year. We measure the number of safety incidents with the total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”) metric and the severity of incidents with the days away restricted and transferred (“DART”) metric. The table below represents our result from the two most recent calendar years:

TRIR = total number of recordable cases x 200,000 / total hours worked

DART = number of cases with days away from work x 200,000 / total hours worked by all employees

Community Involvement

Having a positive impact on the community around us is one of our most important values. We donate to local charitable organizations, such as United Way of Long Island, through both monetary contributions, as well as “drives” to collect and deliver employee donated food and school supplies. We actively engage and educate local high school students from surrounding districts about the manufacturing and engineering industry and career trajectory. This includes, hosting educational experiences and shop tours with high school and trade school classes. Members of our leadership team participate on the boards of the local aviation college and trade associations that support and advance the interests of the local community.

In addition to other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following material risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity, and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results did and could continue to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

Risks Related to Our Business

Risks related to our business

We depend on government contracts for a significant portion of our revenues.

We are a supplier, either directly or as a subcontractor, to the U.S. Government and its agencies. Government subcontracts accounted for 56% of our revenue in 2017, 46% of our revenue in 2016 and 57% of our revenue in 2015. In addition, 8% percent of revenue for 2017, 4% of revenue for 2016 and 1% of revenue for 2015 was derived from prime government contract sales. We depend on government contracts for a significant portion of our business. If we are suspended or barred from contracting with the U.S. Government, if our reputation or relationship with individual federal agencies were impaired, or if the U.S. Government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results would be materially adversely affected.

We face risks relating to government contracts.

The funding of U.S. Government programs is subject to congressional budget authorization and appropriation processes. For many programs, the U.S. Congress appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may extend over several fiscal years. Consequently, programs are often only partially funded initially and additional funds are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations. Appropriations are driven by numerous factors, including geopolitical events, macroeconomic conditions, the ability of the U.S. Government to enact relevant legislation, such as appropriations bills and continuing resolutions, the threat or existence of a government shutdown and potential downgrades of the United States’ credit rating, and risks relating to the upcoming U.S. presidential election. We cannot predict the extent to which total funding and/or funding for individual programs will be included, increased or reduced in budgets approved by Congress or be included in the scope of separate supplemental appropriations. In the event that appropriations for any of our programs becomes unavailable, or is reduced or delayed, our contract or subcontract under such program may be terminated or adjusted by the U.S. Government, which could have a material adverse effect on our future sales under such program, and on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We also cannot predict the impact of potential changes in priorities due to military transformation and planning and/or the nature of war-related activity on existing, follow-on, or replacement programs. A shift of government priorities to programs in which we do not participate and/or reductions in funding for or the termination of programs in which we do participate, unless offset by other programs and opportunities, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

In addition, the U.S. Government generally has the ability to terminate contracts, in wholecompletely or in part, without prior notice, for convenience or for default based on performance. In the event of termination for the U.S. Government’s convenience, contractors are generally protected by provisions covering reimbursement for costs incurred on the contracts and profit on those costs but not the anticipated profit that would have been earned had the contract been completed. Termination by the U.S. Government of a contract for convenience could also result in the cancellation of future work on that program. Termination by the U.S. Government of a contract due to our default could require us to pay for re-procurement costs in excess of the original contract price, net of the value of work accepted from the original contract. Termination of a contract due to our default may expose us to liability and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for contracts. Additionally, we are a subcontractor on some U.S. Government contracts. In these arrangements, the U.S. Government could terminate the prime contract for convenience or otherwise, without regard to our performance as a subcontractor. We can give no assurance that we would be awarded new U.S. Government contracts to offset the revenues lost as a result of the termination of any of our U.S. Government contracts.

We have risks associated with competing in the bidding process for contracts.

We obtain many of our contracts through a competitive bidding process. In the bidding process, we face the following risks:

Further consolidation in the aerospace industry could adversely affect our business and financial results.

The A&D industry has experienced significant consolidation, including among our customers, competitors, and suppliers. While we believe we have positioned our Company to take advantage of opportunities to market to a broad customer base, which we believe will reduce the potential impact of industry consolidation, there can be no assurance that industry consolidation will not impact our business. Consolidation among our customers may result in delays in the awarding of new contracts and losses of existing business. Consolidation among our competitors may result in larger competitors with greater resources and market share, which could adversely affect our ability to compete successfully. Consolidation among our suppliers may result in fewer sources of supply and increased costs to us.

We depend upon a select base of large prime defense contractors for the majority of our revenue, which subjects us to unique risks which may adversely affect us.

We currently generate a majority of our revenues by producing products for numerous programs under contracts with three prime defense contractors to the U.S. Government. These significant customers – Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and NGC – constituted approximately 30%, 26% and 12%, respectively of our 2023 revenue. Our revenues from these customers are diversified over several different A&D products, programs, and subsidiaries within these customers, however, any significant change in production rates by any of these customers would have a material effect on our results of operations and cash flows. There is no assurance that our current significant customers will continue to buy products from us at current levels, that we will retain any or all our existing significant customers, or that we will be able to form new relationships with other customers upon the loss of one or more of our existing significant customers.

We are subject to strict governmental regulations relating to the environment, which could result in fines and remediation expenseexpenses in the event of non-compliance.

We are required to comply with extensive and frequently changing environmental regulations at the federal, state, and local levels. Among other things, these regulatory bodies impose restrictions to control air, soil, and water pollution, to protect against occupational exposure to chemicals, including health and safety risks, and to require notification or reporting of the storage, use, and release of certain hazardous substances into the environment. This extensive regulatory framework imposes significant compliance burdens and risks on us. In addition, these regulations may impose liability for the cost of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances released on or in our facilities without regard to whether we knew of, or caused, the release of such substances. Furthermore, we are required to provide a place of employment that is free from recognized and preventable hazards that are likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, provide notice to employees regarding the presence of hazardous chemicals and to train employees in the use of such substances. Our operations require the use of a limited amount of chemicals and other materials for painting and cleaning that are classified under applicable laws as hazardous chemicals and substances. If we are found not to be in compliancecomply with any of these rules, regulations, or permits, we may be subject to fines, remediation expenses, and the obligation to change our business practice, any of which could result in substantial costs that would adversely impactaffect our business operations and financial condition.

We may be subject to fines and disqualification for non-compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) regulations.

We are subject to regulation by the FAA under the provisions of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended. The FAA prescribes standards and licensing requirements for aircraft and aircraft components. We are subject to inspections by the FAA and may be subjected to fines and other penalties (including orders to cease production) for noncompliance with FAA regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in the termination of or our disqualification from some of our contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

If our subcontractors or suppliers fail to perform their contractual obligations, our contract performance, and our ability to obtain future business and our profitability could be materially and adversely impacted.

Most of our contracts involve subcontracts with other companies upon which we rely to perform a portion of the services that we must provide to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors, including disputes regarding the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the subcontract, our failure to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract, or our hiring of personnel of a subcontractor.subcontractor, or disputes concerning payment. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily provide on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services may materially and adversely impactaffect our ability to performfulfill our obligations as the prime contractor. Subcontractor performance deficiencies could result in a customer eliminating our ability to progress bill or terminatingterminate our contract for default. A prohibition on progress billing may have an adverse effect upon our cash flow and profitability and a default termination could expose us to liability and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and orders. In addition, a delay in our ability to obtain components and equipment parts from our suppliers may affect our ability to meet our customers’ needs and may have a material adverse effect upon our profitability.

Due to fixed contract pricing, increasing contract costs exposes us to reduced profitability and the potential loss of future business.

Operating margin is adversely affected when contract costs that cannot be billed to customers are incurred. This cost growth can occur if estimates to complete a contract increase due to technical challenges or if initial estimates used for calculating the contract price were incorrect. The cost estimation process requires significant judgment and expertise. Reasons for cost growth may include unavailability and productivity of labor, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, the effect of change orders, the availability and cost of materials, the effect of any delays in performance, availability, and timing of funding from the customer, natural disasters, pandemics, and the inability to recover any claims included in the estimates to complete. A significant increase in cost estimates on one or more programs could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

We use estimates when accounting for contracts. Changes in estimates couldmay affect our profitability and our overall financial position.

We primarily recognize revenue from our contracts over the contractual period under the percentage-of-completion (POC) method of accounting. Under the POC method of accounting, salespursuant to ASC 606. Pursuant to ASC 606, revenue and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at the completion of the contract. Recognized revenues that will not be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as an asset captioned “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts.“Contract assets.” Contracts where billings to date have exceeded recognized revenues are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as a liability captioned “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts.“Contract liabilities.” Changes to the original estimates may be required during the lifeterm of the contract. Estimates are reviewed monthlyquarterly and the effect of any change in the estimated gross margin percentage for a contract is reflected in the consolidated financial statements infor the period the change becomes known. TheASC 606 requires the use of the POC method of accounting involves considerable use of estimates in determining revenues and profits and in assigning the amounts to accounting periods. As a result, there can be a significant disparity between earnings (both for accounting and taxes) as reported and actual cash received by us during any reporting period.

We continually evaluate all of the issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the POC method of accounting;ASC 606; however, there is no assurance that our estimates will be accurate. If our estimates are not accurate or a contract is terminated, we will be forced to adjust revenue in later periods. Furthermore, even if our estimates are accurate, we may have a shortfall in our cash flow and we may need to borrow money to pay for costs until the reported earnings materialize to actual cash receipts.

If the contracts associated with our backlog were terminated, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

The maximum contract value specified under each contract that we enter into is not necessarily indicative of the revenues that we will realize under that contract. Because we may not receive the full amount we expect under a contract, we may not accurately estimate our backlog because the earnings of revenues on programs included in backlog may never occur or may change. Cancellations of pending contracts or terminations or reductions of contracts in progress could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, or results of operations. As of December 31, 2017, our backlog was approximately $389 million, of which 18% was funded and 82% was unfunded.

We may be unable to attract and retain personnel who are key to our operations.

Our success, among other things, is dependent on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified senior officers and engineers.employees at all levels. Competition for key personnel is intense. Our ability to attract and retain senior officers and experienced, top rate engineersemployees is dependent on a number ofseveral factors, including prevailing market conditions and compensation and benefit packages offered by companies competing for the same talent.talent and our reputation in the industry. If our reputation is adversely affected, we may be unable to recruit, hire, and retain talented personnel. The inability to hire and retain these personspeople may adversely affect our production operations and other aspects of our business.

We are subject to intense competition for the skilled technicians necessary to manufacture our products.

We are subject to intense competition for the services of skilled technicians necessary to manufacture our products. The demand for these individuals may increase as other manufacturers seek to bring to the U.S. manufacturing processes currently outsourced overseas. If the U.S. economy continues to undergo a period of inflation, our labor costs may increase which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are subject to the cyclical nature of the commercial aerospace industry, and any future downturn in the commercial aerospace industry or general economic conditions, including inflation could adversely impact the demand for our products.

Our business may be affected by certain characteristics and trends of the commercial aerospace industry or general economic conditions that affect our customers, such as the current inflationary and high interest rate environment in the U.S. and the resultant impacts on the supply chain, the labor market and the general economy, as well as fluctuations in the aerospace industry’s business cycle, varying fuel and labor costs, intense price competition and regulatory scrutiny, certain trends, including a possible decrease in aviation activity and a decrease in outsourcing by aircraft manufacturers, or the failure of projected market growth to materialize or continue. In the event thatIf these characteristics and trends adversely affect customers in the commercial aerospace industry, they may reduce the overall demand for our products.

Our working capital requirements may negatively affect our liquidity and capital resources.

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the timing of new program awards and the payment terms with our customers and suppliers. If our working capital needs exceed our cash flows from operations, we failwould look to maintain an effective systemour cash balances and availability for borrowings under our credit facility to satisfy those needs, as well as potential sources of internal control over financial reporting, weadditional capital, which may not be ableavailable on satisfactory terms and in adequate amounts, if at all. See “Risks Related to accurately report our financial results. As a result, currentOur Indebtedness and potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.Liquidity” below.

Our management determined that as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on criteria created by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) set forth inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). However, if material weaknesses are identified in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, our management will be unable to report favorably as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and/or our disclosure controls and procedures, and we could be required to implement remedial measures. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Such remedial measures could be expensive and time consuming and could potentially cause investors to lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price and potentially subject us to litigation.

We incur riskrisks associated with new programsprograms.

New programs with new technologies typically carry risks associated with design changes, development of new production tools, increased capital and funding commitments, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery schedules and unique contractual requirements, supplier performance, ability of the customer to meet its contractual obligations to us, and our ability to accurately estimate costs associated with such programs. In addition, any new program may not generate sufficient demand or may experience technological problems or significant delays in the regulatory or other certification or manufacturing and delivery schedule. If we were unable to perform our obligations under new programs to the customer’s satisfaction, if we were unable to manufacture products at our estimated costs, or if a new program in which we had made a significant investment was terminated or experienced weak demand, delays, or technological problems, then our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. This risk includes the potential for default, quality problems, or inability to meet specifications, as well as our inability to negotiate final pricing for program changes and could result in low margin or forward loss contracts, and the risk of having to write-off costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contractscontract assets if itthey were deemed to be unrecoverable over the life of the program.unrecoverable. In addition, beginning new work on existing programs also carries risk associated with the transfer of technology, knowledge, and tooling.

In order toTo perform on new programs, we may be required to expend up-front costs which may not have been negotiated in our selling price. Additionally, we may have made margin assumptions related to those costs, that in the case of significant program delays and/or program cancellations, or if we are not successful in negotiating favorable margin on scope changes, could cause us to bear impairment chargesexperience margin degradation which may be material, for costs that are not recoverable. Such charges and the loss of up-front costs could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity.

We are presently classified as a small business and the loss of our small business status may adversely affect our ability to compete for government contracts.

We are presently classified as a small business under certain of the codes under the North American Industry Classification Systems (“NAICS”) industry and product specific codes whichthat are regulated in the United StatesU.S. by the Small Business Administration.Administration (“SBA”). We are not considered a small business under all NAICS codes. While we do not presently derive a substantial portion of our business from contracts whichthat are set-asideset aside for small businesses, we are able to bid on small business set-aside contracts as well as contracts whichthat are open to non-small business entities. As the NAICS codes are periodically revised, it is possible that we may lose our status as a small business. The loss of small business status would adversely impactaffect our eligibility for special small business programs and limit our ability to partnercollaborate with other business entities which are seeking to team with small business entities as may be required under a specific contract.

Cyber security attacks, internal system or service failures and technological changes, including the use of machine learning and generative artificial intelligence, may adversely impact our business and operations.

Any system or service disruptions, including those caused by projects to improve our information technology systems, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could disrupt our business, and impair our ability to effectively provide products and related services to our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We could also be subject to systems failures, including network, software, or hardware failures, whether caused by us, third-party service providers, intruders or hackers, computer viruses, natural disasters, power shortages, or terrorist attacks. Cyber security threats are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, phishing, and other unauthorized attempts to gain access to sensitive, confidential, or otherwise protected information related to us or our products, customers, or suppliers, or other acts that could lead to disruptions in our business. Because the techniques used by cyber-attackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these tactics. Any such failures to prevent or mitigate cyber-attacks could cause loss of data and interruptions or delays in our business, cause us to incur remediation costs, or subject us to claims and damage our reputation. In addition, the failure or disruption of our communications or utilities could cause us to interrupt or suspend our operations or otherwise adversely affect our business. Although we utilize various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate the risk of these threats, including contracting with an outside cyber security firm to provide constant monitoring of our systems, and training our employees to recognize attacks, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient. Our property and business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a resultbecause of any system or operational failure or disruption which wouldcould adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Moreover, expenditures incurred in implementing cyber security and other procedures and controls could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our financial results mayability to utilize our tax benefits could be adversely impacted bysubstantially limited if we fail to generate sufficient income or if we experience an “ownership change”.

As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $74.7 million of gross net operating losses (“NOLs”) for federal tax purposes and approximately $17.3 million of post-apportionment NOLs for state tax purposes. As a result of the failureTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020, NOLs arising before January 1, 2018, and NOLs arising after January 1, 2018, are subject to successfully executedifferent rules. Our pre-2018 NOLs totaled approximately $60.3 million; these NOLs will expire in varying amounts from 2034 through 2039, if not utilized, and can offset 100% of future taxable income for regular tax purposes. Our NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 can generally be carried back five years, carried forward indefinitely and can offset 100% of taxable income for tax years before January 1, 2021 and up to 80% of taxable income for tax years after December 31, 2020. Any NOLs arising on or integrate acquisitionsafter January 1, 2021, cannot be carried back, can generally be carried forward indefinitely and joint ventures.can offset up to 80% of future taxable income.

The Company may evaluate potential acquisitions or joint ventures that align with

Our ability to fully recognize the benefits from our strategic objectives. The success of such activity depends, in part,NOLs is dependent upon our ability to identify suitable sellers or business partners, perform effective assessmentsgenerate sufficient income prior to contract execution, negotiate contract terms,their expiration. In addition, our NOL carryforwards may be limited if we experience an ownership change as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”). In general, an ownership change under Section 382 occurs if 5% shareholders increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of our outstanding shares by more than 50 percentage points over a relevant lookback period. The Company completed a Section 382 analysis for the year ended December 31, 2022, and if applicable, obtain customerbelieves that no ownership change occurred during the relevant lookback period through December 31, 2023 that would limit our ability to use our NOLs.

Product liability claims in excess of insurance could adversely affect our financial results and government approval. These activities may present certain financial managerial, staffing and talent, and operational risks, including diversioncondition.

We face potential liability for property damage, personal injury, or death as a result of management's attention from existing core businesses, difficulties integratingthe failure of products designed or separating businesses from existing operations, and challenges presentedmanufactured by acquisitions or joint ventures which mayus. Although we currently maintain product liability insurance (including aircraft product liability insurance), any material product liability not achieve sales levels and profitability that justify the investments made. If the acquisitions or joint ventures are not successfully implemented or completed, therecovered by insurance could behave a negative impactmaterial adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Increased scrutiny from investors, lenders, regulators and other market participants regarding our environmental, social, governance, sustainability or climate responsibilities could expose us to additional costs and adversely impact our liquidity, results of operations, reputation, employee retention, and stock price.

There is an increasing focus from certain investors, customers, and other key stakeholders concerning corporate responsibility, specifically related to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors. Some investors may use ESG criteria to guide their investment strategies and, in some cases, may choose not to invest in us if they believe our policies relating to corporate responsibilities are inadequate.

The ESG factors by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed may change. This could result in greater expectations of us and cause us to undertake costly initiatives to satisfy such new criteria. If we are unable to satisfy the new corporate responsibility criteria, investors may view our policies related to corporate responsibility as inadequate. We risk damage to our reputation in the event our corporate responsibility procedures or goals do not meet the standards or goals set by various constituencies. In addition, if our competitors’ corporate responsibility performance is perceived to be greater than ours, potential or current investors may elect to invest in our competitors instead. Further, in the event we communicate certain initiatives or goals related to ESG, we could fail, or be perceived to have failed, in our achievement of such initiatives or goals. If we fail to satisfy the expectations of investors and other key stakeholders, or our initiatives are not executed as planned, our reputation, employee retention, and willingness of our customers and suppliers to do business with us, financial results, and stock price could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Liquidity

We obtained amendments to and received waivers of and consents to non-compliance with certain covenants under our credit facility with BankUnited and there can be no assurance that we will not fall out of compliance with our covenants in the future.

The Company was not in compliance with certain financial covenants under our credit facility (the “BankUnited Facility” or the “Credit Agreement”) with BankUnited, N.A. (“BankUnited”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, and financial statement submission covenants for the quarters ended March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022 and obtained amendments to and received waivers of and consents to the non-compliance, as described in more detail in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There can be no assurance that we will be in compliance with our covenants in the future or that BankUnited will grant further waivers if we fall out of compliance or consents to future non-compliance. If we fall out of compliance with our banking covenants, BankUnited may declare a default under the BankUnited Facility and, among other remedies, could declare the full amount of the BankUnited Facility immediately due and payable and could foreclose against our collateral. If this were to occur, we may be unable to secure outside financing, if needed, to fund ongoing operations and for other capital needs. Any sources of financing that may be available to us could also be at higher costs and require us to satisfy more restrictive covenants, which could limit or restrict our operations, cash flows, and earnings. We cannot ensure that additional financing would be available to us or be sufficient or available on satisfactory terms.

Our capital requirements, liquidity and financial condition raise significant risks as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the timing of the conclusion of mature programs and new program awards and the payment terms with our customers and suppliers. There is currently no availability for borrowings under the BankUnited Facility and the Company finances its operations from internally generated cash flow. Notes 8 and 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a discussion regarding the BankUnited Facility and recent amendments thereto.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. If we become unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our consolidated financial statements. It is management’s estimation that there will likely not be any individual conditions or combination of events that will occur in the coming year which would cause the Company to be unable to continue as a going concern.

Our cost of borrowing under the Credit Agreement is based on the Prime Rate of interest per annum published in the Money Rates section of The Company's acquisitionWall Street Journal (the “Prime Rate”) plus the margin charged by our lender, and increases in the Prime Rate negatively impact our profitability.

Interest rates under our Credit Agreement are based on the Prime Rate, and as a result, we have exposure to interest rate risk. Certain central banks, such as the U.S. Federal Reserve, effected multiple interest rate increases in 2022 and 2023. Increases in interest rates increase our cost of Welding Metallurgy, Inc. is subjectborrowing and/or potentially make it more difficult to refinance our existing indebtedness.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting over a number of conditions,years which adversely affected our ability to report our financial condition and may not be completed on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, or at all.

On March 21, 2018, the Company entered intoresults of operations in a Stock Purchase Agreement for the purchasetimely and accurate manner. The material weaknesses led to multiple restatements of Welding Metallurgy, Inc. as discussedour consolidated financial statements. The material weaknesses and restatements have resulted in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis - Recent Developments. The completion of the acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including the Company obtaining financing to pay the purchase price, receipt of requisite customer approval, delivery of financial statements to the Company and other customary closing conditions. The Company cannot ensure that the acquisition will be completed on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, or at all. Many of the conditions to the closing of the acquisition are not within the control of the Company and the Company cannot predict when or if these conditions will be satisfied. Theour failure to meet any or allSEC reporting obligations, affected and may continue to affect investor confidence, our stock price and our ability to raise capital in the future, and have resulted and may continue to result in stockholder litigation.

We have reported material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures for reporting periods from 2018 through September 2023. The material weaknesses led to our restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020. Although these material weaknesses have been remediated as of December 31, 2023, these material weaknesses and restatements have affected investor confidence, our stock price, and resulted in the past in our failure to meet various SEC reporting requirements and stockholder litigation.

As described in Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting of income taxes, which led to the restatement within Note 11 “Income Taxes” of the conditions could delayfinancial statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K the closing of the acquisition or prevent it from occurring. Any delayCompany’s December 31, 2022 deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities balances. The Company is in the completionprocess of remediating this material weakness.

If a future failure in internal control should occur, it may cause us to fail to meet SEC reporting obligations, negatively affect the acquisitionaccuracy of our financial statements and disclosures, investor and customer confidence, our ability to raise capital in the future and result in events of default under our banking agreement, any of which could causehave a negative effect on the Company notprice of our common stock, subject us to realize some or all of the benefits the Company expects to achieve if the acquisition is completed within the expected timeframe. regulatory investigations and penalties and additional stockholder litigation, and have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Risks Related to Global Events

The ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, and the retaliatory measures imposed by the U.S., United Kingdom, European Union and other countries and the responses of Russia to such measures have caused significant disruptions to domestic and foreign economies.

The invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation had an immediate impact on the global economy resulting in higher prices for oil and other commodities. The U.S., United Kingdom, European Union, and other countries responded to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by imposing various economic sanctions and bans. Russia has responded with its own retaliatory measures. These measures have impacted the availability and price of certain raw materials and transportation costs. The invasion and retaliatory measures also disrupted economic markets. The global impact of these measures is continually evolving and cannot be predicted with certainty and there is no assurance that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and responses thereto will not further disrupt the global economy and supply chain. Further, there is no assurance that even when the invasion of Ukraine ceases, that nations will not continue to impose sanctions and bans on other nations.

While these events have not interrupted our operations or materially impacted our ability to obtain raw materials, these or future developments resulting from the invasion of Ukraine such as a cyberattack on the U.S., us or our suppliers, could make it difficult for or increase the cost of certain raw materials and transportation costs, or make it difficult to access debt and equity capital on attractive terms, if at all, and impact our ability to fund business activities and repay debt on a timely basis.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine may alter countries’ willingness to rely on others as the source of certain products and material.

Historically, prime contractors and OEMs in the U.S. A&D industry have relied upon suppliers outside the U.S. for products and raw materials. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the economic disruption resulting from retaliatory measures may cause many of these companies to rethink these strategies and seek sources of supply within the U.S. To the extent they do so, it could disrupt domestic markets for raw materials and supplies, and the market for the skilled laborers we need to manufacture our products.

We cannot forecast with any certainty whether the disruptions caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, restrictions imposed by various governments in response thereto and resulting changes in business practices, may materially impact our business and our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The conflict between Israel and Hamas, rising tensions between China and Taiwan, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, and terrorist acts and acts of war may seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

U.S. and global responses to actual or potential military conflicts such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, terrorism, perceived nuclear, biological, and chemical threats and other global political crises increase uncertainties with respect to the U.S. and other business and financial markets. Several factors associated, directly or indirectly, with actual or potential military conflicts, terrorism, perceived nuclear, biological, and chemical and cyber threats, and other global political crises and responses thereto, may adversely affect the mix of products purchased by defense departments in the U.S. or other countries to platforms not serviced by us. A shift in defense budgets to product lines we do not produce could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Not applicable.

Cybersecurity risk management is an important part of our overall risk management efforts. We maintain a cybersecurity program that is comprised of policies, procedures, controls and plans whose objective is to help us prevent and effectively respond to cybersecurity threats or incidents. Through our cybersecurity risk management process, we continuously monitor cybersecurity vulnerabilities and potential attack vectors to company systems. We maintain various measures to safeguard against cybersecurity threats such as monitoring systems, security controls, policy enforcement, data encryption, employee training, tools and services from third-party providers and management oversight to assess, identify and mitigate risks from cybersecurity threats. We conduct regular testing of these controls and systems including vulnerability scanning, penetration testing and simulating the execution of parts of our disaster recovery plan. All employees are required to pass a mandatory cybersecurity training course on an annual basis and we regularly conduct phishing simulations to train our employees on how to recognize phishing attempts.

We have implemented cybersecurity frameworks, policies and practices which incorporate industry-standards and contractual requirements. We also contractually flow cybersecurity regulatory requirements to our subcontractors as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement and other government agency specific requirements. These contractual flow downs include the requirement that our subcontractors implement certain information security controls. Additionally, we gather information and review the SOC-2 reports of certain third-parties who integrate with our systems, such as our payroll processor, managed solutions provider and software as a service providers on an annual basis to identify and manage risk. We continuously evaluate and seek to improve and mature our cybersecurity processes. We apply lessons learned from our defense and monitoring efforts to help prevent future attacks and utilize data analytics to detect anomalies and search for cyber threats. Additionally, our Internal Audit function regularly assesses our program effectiveness through audits of systems and processes to help maintain compliance with policies.

Cybersecurity threats of all types, such as attacks from computer hackers, cyber criminals, nation-state actors, social engineering and other malicious internet-based activities, continue to increase. We believe that our current preventative actions and response planning provide adequate measures of protection against cybersecurity risks. While we have implemented measures to safeguard our information technology systems, the evolving nature of cybersecurity attacks and vulnerabilities means that these protections may not always be effective. In 2023, we did not identify any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, despite our efforts, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced undetected cybersecurity incidents. For additional information about these risks, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Governance

Our board of directors has oversight of our strategic and business risk management and oversees management’s execution of our cybersecurity risk management program. The board receives regular updates from management on our cybersecurity risks. In addition, management updates the board as necessary, regarding any material cybersecurity incidents, as well as incidents with lesser impact potential. Management is responsible for identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks on an ongoing basis, establishing processes to ensure that such potential cybersecurity risk exposures are monitored, putting in place appropriate mitigation measures, maintaining cybersecurity policies and procedures, and providing regular reports to our board of directors. In the event of an incident, we intend to follow our incident response plan, which outlines the steps to be followed from incident detection to mitigation, recovery and notification, including notifying functional areas (e.g. legal), as well as senior leadership and the board, as appropriate.

Our Vice President of Human Resources & Administration (“VP HR&A”) leads our cybersecurity program and is responsible for our overall information security strategy, policy, security engineering, operations and cyber threat detection and response. The VP HR&A manages a team of information technology professionals with broad experience, including in cybersecurity threat assessments and detection, mitigation technologies, incident response, insider threats and regulatory compliance.

Our cybersecurity program is regularly assessed through management self-evaluation and ongoing monitoring procedures to evaluate our program effectiveness, including assessments associated with internal controls over financial reporting as well as vulnerability management through active discovery and testing to validate patching and configuration.

CPI Aero’s executive offices and production facilities arefacility is situated in an approximately 171,000 square foot building located at 91 Heartland Blvd., Edgewood, New York 11717. We use approximately 131,000 square feet of this building for manufacturing space and 40,000 square feet for offices and laboratories for engineering and design work. CPI Aero occupies this facility under a ten-year lease that commenced in June 2011. The current monthly base rent is $139,955, including real estate taxes.expires on April 30, 2026. 

None.This information is set forth in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market Information

Our shares of common sharesstock are listed on the NYSE American exchange under the symbol CVU. The following table sets forth for 2017 and 2016, the high and low sales prices of our common shares for the periods indicated, as reported by the NYSE American.

“CVU”. On March 16, 2018, the closing sale price for our common shares on the NYSE American was$8.30. On March 16, 2018,28, 2024, there were 197171 holders of record of our shares of common shares and, westock. We believe over2,200there are substantially more beneficial ownersholders of our common shares.stock.

Dividend Policy

To date, we have not paid any dividends on our common shares.stock. Any payment of dividends in the future is within the discretion of our board of directors (subject to the limitation on dividends contained in the Bank United CreditBankUnited Facility, as described more fully in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis),Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and will depend on our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial condition and other relevant factors. Our board of directors does not intend to declare any cash or other dividends in the foreseeable future, but intends instead to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business operations.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

There have been no sales of unregistered sales of our equity securities for the three months ended December 31, 2017. The2023. There have been no repurchases of our outstanding common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2017.2023.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan InformationPlans

The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 20172023 with respect to our equity compensation plans that provide for the issuance of options, warrants or rights to purchase our securities.securities:

ITEM 6. Selected Financial DataLong-term equity incentives are an important component of compensation and are designed to align the interests of our executive officers and directors who receive long-term equity awards with the Company’s long-term performance and to increase shareholder value. The Company has awarded long-term incentive compensation pursuant to two plans:

2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, authorizes the grant of 2,200,000 shares of our common stock, which may be granted in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock, stock reload options, and other stock-based awards, to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company. As of December 31, 2023, we have granted 1,580,945 shares under this plan and 619,055 shares remained available for grant under this plan.

Performance Equity Plan 2009. The Performance Equity Plan 2009 authorizes the grant of 500,000 stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock, stock reload options, and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2023, we have granted 497,636 shares under this plan and 2,364 shares remained available for grant.

Not applicable.

The following table sets forthdiscussion and analysis of our financial data ascondition and results of the dates and for the periods indicated. The data has been derived from our audited financial statements. The selected financial dataoperations should be read in conjunctiontogether with our auditedconsolidated financial statements and MDA. Our results of operations for 2016 and 2014 were materially affected by the change in estimate described in MDA.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

When usedrelated notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “management expects” or “we expect,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning10-K. Some of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any suchinformation contained in this discussion and analysis includes forward-looking statements each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certaininvolving risks and uncertainties thatand should be read together with the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipatedthe results described in or projected. The risks are included in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” and “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have no obligation to publicly releaseimplied by the result of any revisions, which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances occurring aftercontained in the date of such statements.following discussion and analysis.

You should read the financial information set forth below in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto.

Recent Developments

On March 21, 2018,February 20, 2024, the Company entered into a Stock PurchaseThirteenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the "Agreement"“Thirteenth Amendment”) with Air Industries Group ("Air Industries"), pursuant. Under the Thirteenth Amendment, the parties amended the Credit Agreement by (a) extending the maturity date of the Company’s existing revolving line of credit to which, subjectAugust 31, 2025; and (b) setting the aggregate maximum principal amount of all revolving line of credit loans to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions,$19,800,000 from January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024, $19,080,000 from April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024, $18,360,000 from July 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024, $17,640,000 from October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, $16,920,000 from January 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025, $16,200,000 from April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025 and $15,480,000 thereafter, and for payments to be made by the Company will purchase from Air Industries all of the shares (the "Shares") of Welding Metallurgy, Inc. ("WMI"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Air Industries (the "Acquisition"). WMI is engaged in the manufacture of complex components and assemblies for the defense and commercial aircraft industries.

Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will pay a purchase price for the Shares as follows: (i) $9.0 million in cash, subject to adjustment basedcomply therewith (if any such payments are necessary), on the working capitalfirst day of WMI at the closing of the Acquisition and (ii) up to an aggregate of $1.0 million, in two payments of up to $500,000 each (the "Contingent Payments") if WMI enters into certain long-term supply agreements. The Contingent Payments are reduced if milestones for signing are not achieved.such period.

The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants of Air Industries and the Company and post-closing indemnities. The representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement generally survive for 18 months following the closing of the Acquisition, with longer survival periods with respect to certain specified representations and warranties.

The completion of the Acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions, approval from certain customers of WMI, the Company obtaining financing to pay the purchase price and the delivery of financial statements to the Company.

The Company anticipates financing the Acquisition through a new term loan to be included with an expanded and extended credit facility to be negotiated with the Company's existing lender. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to expand and extend the credit facility and that the Acquisition will be funded as anticipated.

The Company expects the closing of the Acquisition to occur during the second quarter of 2018.

Business Operations

We are engaged in the contract production of structural aircraft parts for fixed wing aircraft and helicopters in both the commercial and defense markets. We also have also recently expanded oura strong and growing presence in the aerosystems segmentsector of the market, with our production of various reconnaissance pod structures and fuel panel systems. Within the global aerostructure and aerosystem supply chain, we are either a Tier 1 supplier to aircraft OEMs or a Tier 2 subcontractor to major Tier 1 manufacturers. We also are a prime contractor to the U.S. Department of Defense,DOD, primarily the USAF. In conjunction with our assembly operations, we provide engineering, program management, supply chain management and kitting, and MRO services.

Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingencies during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, the valuation of deferred income taxes, and the valuation of inventory. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies which require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. For more discussion of these and other significant accounting policies, refer to Part II, Item 8, Note 1 “Principal Business Activity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition

We primarily recognizeIn accordance with ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue from our contractswhen it transfers control of a promised good or service to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange for the good or service. The majority of the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time as the contractual period underCompany (i) sells products with no alternative use to the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method of accounting.Company and (ii) has an enforceable right to recover costs incurred plus a reasonable profit margin for work completed to date. Under the POC method of accounting,over time revenue recognition model, revenue and gross profit are recognized over the contract period as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and an estimate of costs to complete and resulting total estimated costs at completion. See Part II, Item 8, Note 1 “Principal Business Activity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the completion of the contract. Recognized revenues that will not be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date are recorded as an asset captioned “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts.” Contracts where billings to date have exceeded recognized revenues are recorded as a liability captioned “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts.” Changesnotes to the original estimates may be required during the life of the contract. Estimates are reviewed monthly and the effect of any change in the estimated gross margin percentage for a contract is reflected in theconsolidated financial statements included in the period the change becomes known. The use of the POC method of accounting involves considerable use of estimates in determining revenues and profits and in assigning the amounts to accounting periods. As a result, there can be a significant disparity between earnings (boththis Form 10-K for accounting and taxes) as reported and actual cash received by us during any reporting period. We continually evaluate all of the issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the POC method of accounting; however, we cannot assure you that our estimates will be accurate. If our estimates are not accurate or a contract is terminated, we will be forced to adjust revenue in later periods. Furthermore, even if our estimates are accurate, we may have a shortfall in our cash flow and we may need to borrow money to pay for costs until the reported earnings materialize to actual cash receipts.

When adjustments are required for the estimated total revenue on a contract, these changes are recognized with an inception-to-date effect in the current period. Also, when estimates of total costs to be incurred exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is recorded in the period in which the loss is determined.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”),Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.The new standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The fundamental principles of the guidance are that entities should recognize revenue in a manner that reflects the timing of transfer of goods and services to customers and the amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that an entity expects to receive for the goods and services provided.Entities have the option of two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method for all of its contracts. Following the adoption of Topic 606,additional information regarding the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Deferred Income Taxes – Valuation Allowance

On a quarterly basis, we assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets against future sources of taxable income and reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by recording a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50%) that all or a portion of such assets will not be realized.

Assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets requires the determination of whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for all of its contracts remained materially consistent with historical practice. In addition, following the adoption of Topic 606,a valuation allowance, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, loss carryback and tax-planning strategies. Generally, more weight is given to objectively verifiable evidence, such as a cumulative loss in recent years, as a significant piece of negative evidence to overcome. As of December 31, 2023, the Company achieved three years of consecutive book and taxable income, along with projections of profitability, for which management determined that there is sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will changebe realized. As such, $14,170,891 of the presentationvaluation allowance was released during the fourth quarter of 2023, leaving a balance in the valuation allowance of $569,143 as of December 31, 2023.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. The Company capitalizes labor, material, subcontractor and overhead costs as work-in-process for contracts where control has not yet passed to the customer. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand, future purchase commitments with its balance sheet movingsuppliers, and the estimated usability for its costs and estimated earningsinventory. If the Company’s review indicates a reduction in excess of billings on uncompleted contractsusability below carrying value, it reduces its net inventory to contract assets and its billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings to contract liabilities.net realizable value.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2017 as Compared toThe following discussion provides an analysis of our results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Year Ended December 31, 2016accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Revenue.

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $81,283,148$86,466,321 compared to $81,329,858$83,335,764 for the same period last year ended December 31, 2022, representing a decreasean increase of $46,710.$3,130,557, or 3.8%. The increase was primarily related to increases in the Raytheon - SDTA program and the T-38 Pacer Classic program, partly offset by decreases in the Sikorsky HIRRS program.

Overall, revenueRevenue generated from prime government contracts for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $6,647,248$11,842,145 compared to $3,493,343$8,663,308 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $3,153,905.$3,178,837, or 36.7%. This increase is primarily a result of increased revenue recognized on the T-38CT-38 Pacer Classic III aircraft structural modification program, as this program has transitioned from the start-up stage to the delivery stage.program.

Revenue generated from government subcontracts for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $45,080,617$69,672,602 compared to $37,355,447$69,023,729 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $7,725,170. This$648,873, or 0.9%. The increase is the result of many factors, predominatelyin revenue was primarily related to increases in revenue on new programs as they ramp up production, or new purchases orders on continuing programs. Examples of programs with increases in revenue in 2017 compared to 2016 include: NGC radar pod, $1 million, the Raytheon next generation jammer pod, $7.2 million,- SDTA program and the Lockheed F-35 lock assemblies, $1.4 million, Bell helicopter engine inlets, $2.8 million, Sikorsky gunner windows, $1.2 million and Sikorsky weapons pylon, $1.2 million. These were partiallyMartin F-16 Rudder Island program, partly offset by a $9 million decreasedecreases in revenue on the Sikorsky HIRRS program and the NGC E-2D program, as this program transitions towards the end of deliveries on the most recent multiyear order.WOWP program.

Revenue generated from commercial contracts was $29,555,283 for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $4,951,574 compared to $40,481,068$5,648,727 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, a decrease of $10,925,785. This decrease is predominately the result of a $4.7 million$697,153, or 12.3%. The decrease in revenue resulted from decreased revenue recognized on the Company’sGulfstream G650 program, a result of lower production, and a $5.6 million decreasewhich concluded in the Company’s Embraer program. Embraer cut back on delivery requirements in the fourth quarter of 2016, as it had completed retrofitting all older aircraft with new engine inlets. Current requirements on the Embraer program are only for new production aircraft.2022.

Cost of sales.sales

Cost of sales for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 20162023 was $62,637,232 and $77,010,940, respectively, a decrease$69,400,693 compared to $67,031,502 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $14,373,708$2,369,191 or 18.7%3.5%.

The components of cost of sales were as follows:

Procurement for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $41,286,646$46,020,628 compared to $52,504,318,$46,094,088 for the year ended December 31, 2022, a decrease of $11,217,672$73,460 or 21.4%0.2%. TheThis decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in procurement wasfor the result of lower procurement onLockheed Martin F-16 Rudder Island program, the Company’sRaytheon - SDTA program, the NGC E-2D MYP II OWP program as we did multiyear volume discounted buysand the NGC E2D WOWP program, the Bell AH-1Z program, the Gulfstream G650 program and the Raytheon B-52 Radar Rack program, partly offset by increases in 2016.the Sikorsky HIRRS program and the Raytheon Next Generation Jammer – Mid-Band pod program.

Labor costs for the year ended December 31, 20172023 were $6,745,038$7,054,308 compared to $8,112,981, a decrease of $1,367,943 or 16.9%. This decrease is predominately due to decreases in labor on our A-10 program, as we near completion on the assemblies from that program, as well as a decrease in labor on the Company’s Embraer program, as we decreased production on that program, as described above.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company had information that the USAF was intending to increase the number of ship sets on order for the A-10. An increase in the number of ship sets on order would improve the Company’s estimated gross margin on the overall program.

In April 2016, the Company became aware that the USAF had reevaluated its position and as such had deferred any decision regarding increasing the orders on the A-10 program. These changes in position by the USAF were supported by communications from Boeing, the Company’s customer.

Based on the above facts, the Company believed that, it was not probable that there would be any future orders on the A-10 beyond the 173 currently on order. As a result of the information that management became aware of in April 2016, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Company estimated that the A-10 program would run through the conclusion of its current purchase order with Boeing at ship set number 173. The change in estimate resulted in a reduction of revenue of approximately $8.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Other contract costs (credit)$6,829,405 for the year ended December 31, 2017 was ($1,164,888) compared to $643,495, a decrease2022, an increase of $1,808,383. Other contract costs relate to expenses recognized for changes in estimates and expenses predominately associated with loss contracts. Other contract costs are comprised predominantly$224,903 or 3.3%. The increase is primarily the result of charges related to the change in estimatehigher labor cost incurred on the Boeing A-10 program in 2016. InWarthog program.

Factory overhead costs for the year ended December 31, 2017, other2023 were $16,028,140 compared to $15,730,682 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $297,458 or 1.9%. The increase is primarily the result of higher overhead rates incurred on the Raytheon Next Generation Jammer – Mid-Band pod program, the Sikorsky – Gunner Windows program and the Lockheed Martin F-16 Rudder Island program.

Other cost of sales relates to items that can increase or decrease cost of sales such as changes in inventory levels, changes in inventory valuation, changes to inventory reserves, changes in loss contract provisions and direct charges to cost of sales. For the year ended December 31, 2023, there were costs arein the amount of $297,617 compared to a credit, as we have incurred actual expenses on our A-10 program that had been previously recognized as partreduction of costs in the changeamount of $1,622,673 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $1,920,290 or 118.3%. The increase is primarily the result of a higher level of cost decrease in estimate charge.2022 related to changes in inventory levels and loss contract reserve reductions.

Gross profit.

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $18,645,916$17,065,628 compared to $4,318,918$16,304,262 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $14,326,998.$761,366 or 4.7%. Gross profit percentage (“gross margin”) for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was 22.9%19.7% compared to 5.3%19.6% for the same period last year predominately the result of the change in estimate on the Company’s A-10 program in 2016.ended December 31, 2022.

Favorable/Unfavorable(Unfavorable) Adjustments to Gross Profit

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015, circumstances required that2022, we makemade changes in estimates to various contracts. Such changes in estimates resulted in decreaseschanges in total gross profit as follows:

During the year ended December 31, 2017 we had one contract which had an approximately $822,000 of unfavorable adjustments caused by changing estimates on a long-term program. We are working with the customer to agree to contract extensions and expect to decrease our selling price. Additionally, we had one contract that had a gap in production, as well as a smaller than expected order quantity. The gap in production and low quantity has resulted in an unfavorable adjustment of approximately $514,000. There were no other material changes, favorable or unfavorable, during the year ended December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 we had one contract which had an approximately $270,000 unfavorable adjustment caused by excess laborSelling, general and procurement costs due to difficulty in the manufacturing process. In addition, we had an approximate $354,000 unfavorable adjustment on one contract that was canceled by the government. Also, we had 4 contracts that each had between $140,000administrative expenses

Selling, general and $245,000 (cumulatively $890,000) of unfavorable adjustments caused by excess labor costs incurred. No other individual favorable or unfavorable changes in estimatesadministrative expenses (“SG&A”) for the year ended December 31, 20162023 were material.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had one contract on which we experienced technical issues, which resulted in excess engineering time and additional procurement costs that caused an unfavorable adjustment of approximately $1,434,000. Additionally there was one contract that was running over the budgeted labor, which caused an unfavorable adjustment of approximately $758,000. Additionally, on one contract we had significant engineering changes, which resulted in excess labor and procurement costs that caused an unfavorable adjustment of approximately $3,000,000. No other individual favorable or unfavorable changes in estimates$10,758,624 compared to $11,410,067 for the year ended December 31, 2015 were material.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $8,449,594 compared to $8,614,190 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, a decrease of $164,596,$651,443 or 1.9%5.7%. ThisThe decrease was primarily due to a decrease of approximately $364,000 in accountingdecreased insurance expense and legal fees related mostly to the extension of 2016 costs related to the 2015 audit process and an executive compensation study, a decrease of $311,000 for the reserve for disputed account receivables with various customers, offset by an increase of $400,000 in accrued bonuses and an increase of $93,000 in salaries.fees.

Interest expense.expense

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $1,698,914,$2,455,214, compared to $1,356,645 for 2016, an increase of $342,269 or 25.2%. The increase in interest expense is the result of an increase in the average amount of outstanding debt during 2017 as compared to 2016.

Income (loss) from operations. We had income from operations$2,271,101 for the year ended December 31, 20172022, an increase of $10,196,322 compared to loss from operations$184,113 or 8.1%. The increase is the result of $4,295,272higher year-over-year interest rates charged on our outstanding debt under the Credit Agreement, partially offset by a year-over-year decrease in the amount of our outstanding debt under the Credit Agreement.

Income before provision for income taxes

Income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase2023 was predominately the result in the increase in gross profit described above.

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.Our historic effective tax rate has been between 30%-32% of taxable income. The rate has been below the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% because of our ability$3,851,790 compared to utilize the domestic production activity deduction, available to companies that do manufacturing within the United States. Since 2015, we have been providing for state income taxes in states where, although we don’t have any property or full time employees, the historic method for the allocation of state income taxes, we do have sales and have employees present on at least a part time basis. As such the effective tax rate for both 2017 and 2016 is approximately 32% and 37%, respectively.

In accordance with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”), we have recorded a credit for income taxes of $207,000. The impact of the U.S. Tax Reform is primarily from revaluing our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. For U.S. federal purposes the corporate statutory income tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21%, effective for our 2018 tax year. The provisional impact of the U.S. Tax Reform is our current best estimate based on the preliminary review of the new law and is subject to revision based on our existing accounting for income taxes policy as further information is gathered and interpretation and analysis of the tax legislation evolves. The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued rules allowing for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the U.S Tax Reform to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. Any future changes to our provisional estimated impact of the U.S Tax Reform will be included as an adjustment to the provision for income taxes.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2015

Revenue. Revenue$2,623,094 for the year ended December 31, 20162022, an increase of $1,228,696 or 46.8%. The increase was $81,329,858 compared to $100,202,557driven by the aforementioned increase in gross profit and decrease in SG&A, partially offset by the increase in interest expense described above.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

The income tax (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2015, representing a decrease2023 was ($13,349,414), which was an effective tax (benefit) rate of $18,872,699.

Overall, revenue generated from prime government contracts(346.6%), as compared to the income tax (benefit) of ($6,553,131) for the year ended December 31, 20162022, which was $3,493,343 comparedan effective tax (benefit) rate of (249.8%). The income tax (benefit) in 2023 and 2022 was primarily due to $892,752reductions of the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance recorded by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2023 and the fourth quarter of 2022 of $14,170,891 and $6,473,532, respectively.

Net income

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $2,600,591. This increase is a result of our deliveries on our F-16 contract, that began in 2016.

Revenue generated from government subcontracts2023 was $17,201,204 compared to $9,176,225 for the year ended December 31, 20162022, an increase of $8,024,979 or 87.5%. The increase in net income was $37,355,447 compared to $56,982,785driven by the aforementioned increase in gross profit, decrease in SG&A and the 2023 income tax (benefit), partially offset by the aforementioned increase in interest expense.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share was $1.40 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $19,627,338. This decrease is the result of many factors including: a $13.4 million decrease in revenue on the Company’s A-10 program with Boeing because of a change in estimate on the program,2023 calculating utilizing 12,311,219 weighted average shares outstanding as previously described, a $5.6 million decrease in revenue from the Company’s E-2D program with NGC, duecompared to the timing of work related to the multiyear order received in 2014, a $1.0 million decrease in revenue from the Company’s gunner window program with Sikorsky, due to lower orders, and a $1.3 million decrease in revenue from the Company’s fuel panel program with Sikorsky, due to lower orders. These decreases were offset by a $4.8 million increase in the Company’s E-2D wet outer wing program, which had only nominal activity in 2015 and was in production in 2016.

Revenue generated from commercial contracts was $40,481,068$0.74 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $42,327,0202022 calculated utilizing 12,389,890 weighted average shares outstanding, an increase of $0.66 per share, or 88.8%. Diluted earnings per share was $1.38 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,845,952. This decrease is predominately the result of a $3.9 million decrease in the Company’s Cessna Citation + program,2023 calculated utilizing 12,471,961 weighted average shares outstanding as we completed production on our outstanding order, a $1.3 million decrease in the Company’s Embraer program, as Embraer cut back on delivery requirements in the fourth quarter of 2016, a $800,000 decrease in revenue on the Company’s Honda program, as we near completion of the flap and vane portion of this program and a $2.8 million decrease in revenue from various Sikorsky commercial programs, the result of lower demand. These decreases were offset by a $6.5 million increase in revenue from the Company’s G650 program.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received approximately $36.5 million of new contract awards, which included $6.3 million of government prime contract awards, approximately $10.4 million of government subcontract awards and approximately $19.8 million of commercial contract awards, compared to $61.6 million of new contract awards in 2015, which included $13.3 million in government prime contract awards, $14.1 million of government subcontract awards and $34.2 million of commercial contract awards.

Cost of sales

Cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $77,010,940 and $83,600,854, respectively, a decrease of $6,589,914 or 7.9%.

The components of the cost of sales were as follows:

Procurement$0.74 for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $52,504,318 compared to $57,473,129, a decrease of $4,968,811 or 8.6%. The decrease in procurement was the result of lower procurement on the Company’s E-2D program, as we did multiyear volume discounted buys in 2015. .

Labor costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $8,112,981 compared to $9,188,417, a decrease of $1,075,436 or 11.7%. This decrease is predominately due to decreases in labor on our A-10 program, as we near completion on some of the assemblies from that program, as well as a decrease in labor on the Company’s Cessna Citation program, as we completed the assemblies on order on that program. .

Factory overhead for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $15,750,146 compared to $16,431,764, a decrease of $681,618 or 4.2%. This decrease is the result of a decrease in employee benefits, factory supplies and indirect salaries, as shop production has declined. .

Gross profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $4,318,918 compared to $16,601,703 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $12,282,785. Gross profit percentage (“gross margin”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 5.3% compared to 16.6% for the same period in 2015, predominately the result of the change in estimate on the Company’s A-10 program.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $8,614,190 compared to $7,636,148 for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022 calculated utilizing 12,389,890 weighted average shares outstanding, an increase of $978,042,$0.64 per share, or 12.8%. This increase was primarily due to an approximately a $460,000 increase in accounting and legal fees related mostly to the extended 2015 audit process and an executive compensation study, a $411,000 reserve for disputed account receivables with various customer and an increase of $355,000 in salaries.

Interest expense.Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,356,645, compared to $918,129 for 2015, an increase of $438,516 or 47.8%. The increase in interest expense is the result of an increase in the average amount of outstanding debt during 2016 as compared to 2015.

Income (loss) from operations. We had loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $4,295,272 compared to income from operations of $8,965,555 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.Our historic effective tax rate has been between 30%-32% of taxable income. The rate has been below the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% because of our ability to utilize the domestic production activity deduction, available to companies that do manufacturing within the United States. Beginning in 2015, we are providing for state income taxes in states where, although we don’t have any property or full time employees, the historic method for the allocation of state income taxes, we do have sales and have employees present on at least a part time basis. As such the effective tax rate for both 2016 and 2015 is approximately 37%86.4%.

Business Outlook

The statements in the “Business Outlook” section and other forward-looking statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are subject to revision during the course of the year in our quarterly earnings releases and SEC filings and at other times.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.General. At December 31, 2017,2023, we had working capital of $78,137,801$15,402,381 compared to $70,595,485working capital of $12,896,602 at December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $7,542,316,$2,505,779, or 10.7%19.4%. This increase is predominatelyprimarily the result of increasesan increase in Costscontract assets and Estimated Earningscash, partially offset by an increase in excessaccrued expenses and accounts payable and a decrease in current portion of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts (“CEE”).long-term debt.

Cash Flow.Flow. A large portion of our cash is used to pay for materials and processing costs associated with contracts that are in process and which do not provide for progress payments. Costs for which we are not able to bill on a progress basis are components of CEEcontract assets on our consolidated balance sheet and represent the aggregate costs and related earnings for uncompleted contracts for which the customer has not yet been billed. These costs and earnings are recovered upon shipment of products and presentation of billings in accordance with contract terms.

Because the POC method of accountingASC 606 requires us to use estimates in determining revenues, costs and profits and in assigning the amounts to accounting periods, there can be a significant disparity between earnings (both for accounting and tax purposes) as reported and actual cash that we receive during any reporting period. Accordingly, it is possible that we may have a shortfall in our cash flow and may need to borrow money or take steps to defer cash outflows until the reported earnings materialize into actual cash receipts.

Several of our programs require us to expend up-front costs that may have to be amortized over a portion of production units. In the case of significant program delays and/or program cancellations, we could be required to bear impairment charges,experience margin degradation, which may be material for costs that are not recoverable. Such charges and the loss of up-front costs could have a material impact on our liquidity and results of operations.

We continue to work to obtain better payment terms with our customers, including accelerated progress payment arrangements, as well as exploring alternative funding sources.

At December 31, 2017,2023, our cash balance was $1,430,877$5,094,794 compared to $1,039,586$3,847,225 at December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $391,291. Our accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2017 decreased to $5,379,821 from $8,514,613 at December 31, 2016.

Bank Credit Facilities.

On December 5, 2012, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Santander Bank (as further amended on August 6, 2014 and March 31, 2015, the “Credit Agreement”) as the sole arranger, administrative agent, collateral agent and lender and Valley National Bank as lender. The Credit Agreement provided for a revolving credit facility of $35 million (the “Revolving Facility”)$1,247,569, or 32.4%. The Revolvingincrease was driven by $3,928,341 in cash provided by operations, partly offset by our pay down of outstanding debt during 2023 of $2,679,766.

BankUnited Facility and term loan under

This information is set forth in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, appearing following Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Leases

This information is set forth in Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, appearing following Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Liquidity

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the Credit Agreement are secured by all of our assets.

On March 9, 2012, the Company obtained a $4.5 million term loan from Santander Bank to be amortized over five years (the “Santander Term Loan”). The Santander Term Loan was used by the Company to purchase tooling and equipment for new programs. The Santander Term Loan was payable in monthly installments of $75,000, with a final paymenttiming of the remaining principal balance on March 9, 2017. The Santander Term Loan bore interest atconclusion of mature programs and new program awards and the lower of LIBOR plus 3% or Santander Bank’s prime rate. The Santander Term Loan was subject to the amendedpayment terms with our customers and restated terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement.

In connection with the Santander Term Loan, the Company and Santander Bank entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement, in the notional amount of $4.5 million. Under the interest rate swap, the Company paid an amount to Santander Bank representing interest on the notional amount at 4.11% and received an amount from Santander representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one-month LIBOR plus 3%. The effect of this interest rate swap was that the Company paid a fixed interest rate of 4.11% over the term of the Santander Term Loan.

Bank United, N.A. assumed and succeeded to all the right and interest of Santander in connection with the Credit Agreement, Revolving Facility and Santander Term Loan. On March 24, 2016, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank United, N.A. as the sole arranger, administrative agent and collateral agent (the “BankUnited Facility”). The BankUnited Facility providessuppliers. There is currently no availability for a revolving credit loan commitment of $30 million and a $10 million term loan. The term ofborrowings under the BankUnited Facility is through March of 2019. The revolving loan bears interest atand the Company finances its operations from internally generated cash flow. Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II - Item 8 includes a rate based upon a pricing grid, as defined in the agreement. The range for LIBOR based loans is between 2.5% and 3.25% above the then applicable LIBOR rate. The range of base rate loans is between the bank’s prime rate and 0.75% above the bank’s prime rate.

In connection withdiscussion regarding the BankUnited Facility the Company terminated the Santander interest swap agreement.

On May 9, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the BankUnited Facility. The Amendment changed the definition of EBITDAand recent amendments thereto which provide, among other things, for the Leverage Coverage Ratio Covenant for the remainder of 2016increases in principal payments and changed the maximum leverage ratio from 3 to 1 to 3.5 to 1 for the quarters ending June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016. Also, the Amendment increased the interest rate on the BankUnited Facility by 50 basis pointsloans provided for therein. Management has (i) negotiated and requiresexecuted a further amendment to the repayment of a portionCredit Agreement which extended the maturity date of the Term LoanCredit Agreement to August 31, 2025, (ii) obtained and regularly seeks additional progress payment and advance payment customer contract funding provisions, (iii) maintained procedures to minimize investments in inventory and tocontract assets, (iv) remained focused on its military customer base and (v) maintained its approximately $118.2 million backlog of funded orders, 98% of which are for military programs. Based upon the extentaforementioned factors, it is management’s estimation that there will likely not be any individual conditions or combination of events that will occur in the coming year which would cause the Company receives any contract reimbursement payments fromto be unable to meet its current Request for Equitable Adjustment with Boeing on the A-10 program.obligations or otherwise continue as a going concern. However, there can be no assurance that such plans will accomplish their intended goals.

Also, in May 2016, the Company entered into a new interest rate swap with the objective of reducing our exposure to cash flow volatility arising from interest rate fluctuations associated with certain debt. The notional amount, maturity date, and currency of this contract match those of the underlying debt.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the Bank United Facility, as amended.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $22.8 million outstanding and as of December 31, 2016, the Company had $22.4 million outstanding under the BankUnited Facility.

We believe that our existing resources, together with the availability under our credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our current working capital needs for at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance of our financial statements.

Contractual Obligations.Obligations

The table below summarizes information about our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172023 and the effects these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the future years.

Inflation

Inflation.Inflation historically has not had a material effect on our operations.operations, although the current inflationary environment in the U.S., and its impact on interest rates, the supply chain, the labor market and general economic conditions, are factors that the Company actively monitors in an attempt to mitigate and manage potential negative impacts on and risks faced by the Company. The majority of the Company’s long term contracts with its customers reflect fixed pricing and its long term contracts with its suppliers reflect fixed pricing. When bidding for work, the Company takes inflation risk and supply side pricing risk into account in its proposals.

Management does not believe thatInterest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk on variable-rate credit facilities for which there is any material market risk exposure with respectwas $20,040,000 outstanding at December 31, 2023. Additionally, if we were to derivative or other financial instruments that would require disclosure under this item.refinance our long-term debt, it may be refinanced at higher interest rates.

This information appears following Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our

Our management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and Board of Directors, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluationhas evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2017. Based on this evaluation,they have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report are effective in timely providing them with material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act.

There were no material changes inAnnual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2017Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures.procedures were not effective due to the material weakness described below. 

The report called for by Item 308(a) of Regulation S-K is included herein as “Management’sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting.”Reporting 

The attestation report called for by Item 308(b) of Registration S-K is included herein as “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our managementManagement is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesU.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established inInternal Control- Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2017.2023 because of the material weakness described below. 

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In connection with management’s evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting described above, management identified a material weakness in its internal controls relating to the inadequate review, assessment of and reporting of the Company’s temporary differences between book and taxable income. This material weakness led to the need to restate within Note 11 “Income Taxes” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K the Company’s December 31, 2022 deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities balances, which had no impact to the Company’s previously reported net deferred tax asset on its December 31, 2022 Balance Sheet and no impact to the Company’s previously reported Net Income, Earnings Per Share or Cash Flow for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022. The restatement of the aforementioned balances, as well as additional details regarding the restatement adjustments, appears in Note 11 “Income Taxes” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company is in the process of remediating the aforementioned material weakness. The Company’s remediation plans currently include conducting a comprehensive review of the scope and work of its outside tax advisor, providing additional education and training in tax accounting to the its finance personnel and requiring additional review of, approval over and documentation of the work product of its tax advisor and tax accounting preparors.

Conclusion  

As described above, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2023.

Notwithstanding the conclusion by our management that our controls and procedures as of December 31, 2023 were not effective, as described above with respect to income tax accounting, management believes that the consolidated financial statements and related financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the dates presented, and for the periods ended on such dates, in conformity with U.S. GAAP. 

CPI is a non-accelerated filer for 2023. As such, CPI is not subject to the requirement to have an auditor attestation report on internal control over financial reporting in the 10-K filed in 2024 for 2023.

Changes in Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

ThereOther than as disclosed above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017,2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, outour internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

ToDuring the Board of Directors and Shareholders CPI Aerostructures, Inc. 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited CPI Aerostructures, Inc.’s (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as ofquarter ended December 31, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective2023, we implemented additional internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the balance sheets and thecontrols related statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows of the Company, and our report dated March 22, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance withreconciliation of accounts receivable that include more timely account reconciliation and transactional reviews, and strengthening oversight controls over the U.S. federal securities lawsaccounts receivable and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.billing function.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ CohnReznick LLP

Jericho, New York

March 22, 2018

(Continued) 

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATIONNone.

None.

PART III

See Item 14.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

See Item 14.

Item 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

See Item 14.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

See Item 14.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information requiredIncorporated herein by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 will be contained in ourreference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, towhich will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission notno later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this report pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and incorporatedDecember 31, 2023.

Incorporated herein by reference.reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2023.

PART IV

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2023.

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2023.

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2023.

PART IV

1. The following financial statements are filed as a part of this report:(1) Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016 2022  

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015 2022  

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015 2022  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015 2022  

Notes to Financial Statements

**Filed herewith.(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

***XBRL information is furnished and notNone.

(3) The following Exhibits are filed or aas part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.this report:

None

CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS