UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122013
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-33332
WABCO Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 20-8481962 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Chaussee de Wavre, 1789 1160 Brussels, Belgium | | |
| | |
One Centennial Avenue, P.O. Box 6820, Piscataway, NJ | | 08855-6820 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code +32 2 663 98 00
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common stock, par value $0.01 per share | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. xo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).
|
| | | | | | |
| Large Accelerated Filer | | x | | Accelerated Filer | | o |
| | | | |
| Non-Accelerated Filer | | o | | Smaller Reporting Company | | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock (Common Stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of business on June 29, 201228, 2013, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $3.4$4.7 billion based on the closing sale price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. The registrant does not have any non-voting common equity.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
| | | | |
| Common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding at | | | |
February 13, 20135, 2014 | | 62,812,91261,324,301 |
| shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates information from certain portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the fiscal year end of December 31, 2012.2013.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K
Year ended December 31, 20122013
|
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | | Page |
| |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| Item 4A. | | |
| |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| |
| Item 15. | | |
| | | |
Information Concerning Forward Looking Statements
Certain of the statements contained in this report (other than the historical financial data and other statements of historical fact), including, without limitation, statements as to management's expectations and beliefs, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various facts and were derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important factors, and changes in such facts, assumptions or factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our future financial performance, financial condition, liquidity, business strategy, projected plans and objectives. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “strategies,” “prospects,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans,”“believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “strategies”, “prospects”, “intends”, “projects”, “estimates”, "continues", "evaluates", “forecasts”, “seeks”, “plans”, "goals", "potential", “may increase,”increase”, “may fluctuate,”fluctuate”, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward looking in nature and not historical facts. This report includes important information as to risk factors in “Item 1. Business”, “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, and “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Many important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from management's expectations, including:
the actual level of commercial vehicle production in our end-markets;
adverse developments in the business of our key customers;
periodic changes to contingent liabilities, including those associated with litigation matters and government investigations;liabilities;
adverse developments in general business, economic and political conditions or any outbreak or escalation of hostilities on a national, regional or international basis;
changes in international or U.S. economic conditions, such as inflation, interest rate fluctuations, foreign exchange rate fluctuations or recessions in our markets;
unpredictable difficulties or delays in the development of new product technology;
pricing changes to our supplies or products or those of our competitors, and other competitive pressures on pricing and sales;
our ability to receive componentcomponents and parts from our suppliers;suppliers or to obtain them at reasonable price levels due to fluctuations in the costs of the underlying raw materials;
our ability to access credit markets or capital markets on a favorable basis or at all;
changes in the environmental regulations that affect our current and future products;
competition in our existing and future lines of business and the financial resources of competitors;
our failure to comply with regulations and any changes in regulations;
our failure to complete potential future acquisitions or to realize benefits from completed acquisitions;
our inability to implement our growth plan;
the loss of any of our senior management;
difficulties in obtaining or retaining the management and other human resource competencies that we need to achieve our business objectives;
labor relations; and
risks inherent in operating in foreign countries, including exposure to local economic conditions, government regulation, currency restrictions and other restraints, changes in tax laws, expropriation, political instability and diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights.
We undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless we are required to do so by law.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Except as otherwise indicated or unless context otherwise requires “WABCO”, “WABCO Holdings Inc.,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to WABCO Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
WABCO is a leading provider of electronic, mechanical and mechatronic products for the world's leading commercial truck, trailer, bus and passenger car manufacturers. We manufacture and sell control systems, including advanced braking, stability, suspension, transmission control and air compressing and processing systems, that improve vehicle performance and safety and reduce overall vehicle operating costs. We estimate that our products are included in approximately two out of three commercial vehicles with advanced vehicle control systems and offered in sophisticated, niche applications in cars and sport utility vehicles (SUVs). We continue to grow in more parts of the world as we provide more components and systems throughout the life of a vehicle, from design and development to the aftermarket.
History of Our Company
WABCO was founded in the United States in 1869 as Westinghouse Air Brake Company. We were purchased by American Standard Companies Inc. (or “American Standard”)(American Standard) in 1968 and operated as the Vehicle Control Systems business division within American Standard until we were spun off from American Standard on July 31, 2007. Subsequent to our spin-off, American Standard changed its name to Trane Inc., which we herein refer to as “Trane.” On June 5, 2008, Trane was acquired in a merger with Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited (“Ingersoll Rand”)(Ingersoll Rand) and exists today as a wholly owned subsidiary of Ingersoll Rand.
Products and Services
We develop, manufacture and sell advanced braking, stability, suspension and transmission control systems primarily for commercial vehicles. Our largest-selling products are pneumatic anti-lock braking systems (ABS), electronic braking systems (EBS), automated manual transmission systems, air disc brakes, and a large variety of conventional mechanical products such as actuators, air compressors and air control valves for heavy and medium-sized trucks, trailers and buses. We also supply advanced electronic suspension controls and vacuum pumps to the car and SUV markets in Europe, North America and Asia. We sell replacement parts, diagnostic tools, training and other services to commercial vehicle aftermarket distributors, repair shops, and fleet operators and provide remanufacturing services.
WABCO is a leader in improving highway safety, with products that help drivers prevent accidents by enhancing vehicle responsiveness and stability. For example, we offer a stability control system for trucks and buses that constantly monitors the vehicle's motion and dynamic stability. If the system detects vehicle instability, such as the driver swerving to avoid another vehicle, it responds by applying the brakes at specific wheels, or slowing the vehicle down to minimize the risk of instability or a rollover.
In 2013, we showcased the industry’s first Hydraulic Anti-Lock Braking System Integrated with ESCsmart Electronic Stability Control. We now uniquely deliver hydraulic as well as pneumatic ABS with ESC systems for manufacturers of commercial vehicles of all sizes from Class 5 to Class 8, offering the industry’s most comprehensive portfolio of stability control solutions. In 2012, we introduced OnLane™, an innovative lane departure warning system (LDWS) for trucks and buses. OnLane increases vehicle safety by providing the driver with visual and acoustic warnings or an optional seat-vibration warning, in case of unintentional lane departure. OnLane is fully compliant with the European Union's regulation that requires LDWS on new trucks and buses as of November 2013. Also in 2012, we acquired Ephicas, a pioneering company in the field of aerodynamic solutions for commercial vehicles. We are developing a range of aerodynamic products, branded OptiFlow™, that are designed to increase vehicle efficiency and reduce fuel consumption for trucks, trailers and buses.
In 2011, we signed contracts with major European commercial vehicle manufacturers to deliver our new breakthrough c-comp™ clutchable air compressor technology. The c-comp technology optimally disengages a truck or bus air compressor from the engine when the vehicle's air system reaches full pressure, allowing for fuel savings up to 264 gallons (1,000 liters) on long haul applications while reducing the vehicle's carbon dioxide emissions. In 2010, we presented our breakthrough OnGuardPLUS™ technology, an advanced emergency braking system (AEBS). OnGuardPLUS is the commercial vehicle industry's first system in compliance with the European Union's regulation to make AEBS mandatory on new heavy commercial vehicles beginning in November 2013. Using a single radar sensor and proprietary algorithms, OnGuardPLUS systems were made available beginning in 2012 for trucks and buses worldwide.
Our key product groups and functions are described below.
|
| | |
| WABCO KEY PRODUCT GROUPS |
| SYSTEM / PRODUCT | | FUNCTION |
| Actuator | | Converts Energy Stored in Compressed Air into Mechanical Force Applied to Foundation Brake to Slow or Stop Commercial Vehicles |
| Air Compressor and Air Processing/Air Management System | | Provides Compressed, Dried Air for Braking, Suspension and other Pneumatic Systems on Trucks, Buses and Trailers |
| Foundation Brake | | Transmits Braking Force to a Disc or Drum (Connected to the Wheel) to Slow, Stop or Hold Vehicles |
| Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) | | Prevents Wheel Locking during Braking to Ensure Steerability and Stability |
| Conventional Braking System | | Mechanical and Pneumatic Devices for Control of Braking Systems in Commercial Vehicles |
| Electronic Braking System (EBS) | | Electronic Controls of Braking Systems for Commercial Vehicles |
| Electronic and Conventional Air Suspension Systems | | Level Control of Air Springs in Trucks, Buses, Trailers and Cars |
| Transmission Automation | | Automates Transmission Gear Shifting for Trucks and Buses |
| Vehicle Electronic Architecture (VEA) | | Central Electronic Modules Integrating Multiple Vehicle Control Functions |
| Vehicle Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and Roll Stability Support (RSS) | | Enhances Driving Stability |
Key Markets and Trends
Electronically controlled products and systems are important for the growth of our business. The market for these products is driven primarily by the growing electronics content of control systems in commercial vehicles. The electronics content has been increasing steadily with each successive platform introduction, as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) look to improve safety and performance through added functionalities, and meet evolving regulatory safety standards. Overall the trends in commercial vehicle design show a shift in demand towards electronics content. Although the pace varies, this is a trend in all major geographies, and braking systems are part of this broader shift from conventional to advanced electronic systems. In addition to increasing safety, improving stopping distances, and reducing installation complexity, advanced EBS also allowallows for new functionality to be introduced into vehicles at a lower price. The new functionality includes stability control, adaptive cruise control, automated transmission controls, brake performance warning, vehicle diagnostics, driver assistance systems and engine braking/speed control. Adaptive cruise control uses sensors to detect proximity to other vehicles and automatically adjusts speed. Automated transmission controls reduce the amount of gear shifting, resulting in better fuel efficiency, less physical effort and training required for drivers, less component wear, fewer parts, and enhanced driver safety and comfort.
Another trend in the global commercial vehicle industry is the movement towards environmental sustainability. This means improving fuel efficiency and reducing emissions. WABCO continues to innovate technology that increases fuel efficiency, reduces vehicle weight and optimizes energy recovery, among other advancements that increase the environmental friendliness of trucks, buses and trailers over the lifetime of the vehicle. WABCO increasesWe increase fuel efficiency through industry breakthroughs such as clutch compressors, high-output two-stage compressors and advanced transmission automation systems. WABCO reducesWe reduce vehicle weight, which influences fuels savings, through industry-leading engineering involving lighter materials and optimized weight-to-performance ratios in a new generation of technologies such as air disc brakes, high-output compressors and air dryer systems. WABCO recuperatesWe also recuperate energy through industry-leading innovations in air processing technology, electronically driven compressors and other products that integrate the vehicle's mechanical operations and braking. In 2013, the crucial element of systems integration was solidly proven with the series production of ABS with ESC systems. ABS with integrated ESC applications improves the vehicle’s directional stability and helps protect against roll-over, skidding and spin-out.
In 2012, we acquired Ephicas, a pioneering company in the field of aerodynamic solutions for commercial vehicles. We are developing a range of aerodynamic products, branded OptiFlow™, that are designed to increase vehicle efficiency and reduce fuel consumption for trucks, trailers and buses.
A fundamental driver of demand for our products is commercial truck production. Commercial truck production generally follows a multi-year cyclical pattern. While the number of new commercial vehicles built fluctuates each year, we have over the last five years demonstrated the ability to grow in excess of these fluctuations by increasing the amount of content on each vehicle. During the five year period through 2012,2013, WABCO's European sales to T&B OEM customers,
excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, outperformed the rate of European T&B production by an average of 3%4% per year.
| | | Year to Year Change | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 |
| Sales to European T&B OEMs (at a constant FX rate) | | 4 | % | | (58 | )% | | 60 | % | | 34 | % | | (10 | )% | | (58 | )% | | 60 | % | | 34 | % | | (10 | )% | | 13 | % |
| European T&B Production | | 4 | % | | (62 | )% | | 52 | % | | 31 | % | | (9 | )% | | (62 | )% | | 52 | % | | 31 | % | | (9 | )% | | 5 | % |
Customers
We sell our products primarily to four groups of customers around the world: truck and bus (OEMs), trailer (OEMs), commercial vehicle aftermarket distributors for replacement parts and services, and major car manufacturers. Our largest customer is Daimler, which accounted for approximately 11% and 12% of our sales in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Volvo accounted for 10% and 11% of our sales in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Volvo accounted for approximately 10% of our sales in both 2013 and 2011, respectively.2012. Other key customers include Ashok Leyland, BMW, China National Heavy Truck Corporation (CNHTC), Cummins, Fiat (Iveco), Hino, Hyundai, Krone, MAN Nutzfahrzeuge AG (MAN), Meritor, Meritor WABCO (a joint venture), Paccar (DAF Trucks N.V. (DAF), Kenworth, Leyland and Peterbilt), First Automobile Works, Otto Sauer Achsenfabrik (SAF), Scania, Schmitz Cargobull AG, TATA Motors and ZF Friedrichshafen AG (ZF). For the fiscal years ended December 31, 20122013, and 2011,2012, our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 52% of our sales.
The largest group of our customers, representing approximately 62% of sales (64%(62% in 2011)2012), consists of truck and bus OEMs who are large, increasingly global and few in numbers due to industry consolidation. As truck and bus OEMs grow globally, they expect suppliers to grow with them beyond their traditional markets and become reliable partners, especially in the development of new technologies. WABCO has a strong reputation for technological innovation and often collaborates closely with major OEM customers to design and develop the technologies used in their products. Our products play an important role in vehicle safety and there are few other suppliers who compete across the breadth of products that we supply.
The second largest group, representing approximately 25% of sales (23%(25% in 2011)2012), consists of the commercial vehicle aftermarket distributor network that provides replacement parts to commercial vehicle operators. This distributor network is a fragmented and diverse group of customers, covering a broad spectrum from large OE-affiliated or owned distributors to small independent local distributors. The increasing number of commercial trucks in operation world-wide that are equipped with our products continuously increases demand for replacement parts and services, thus generating a growing stream of recurring aftermarket sales. Additionally, we continue to develop an array of service offerings such as diagnostics, training and other services to repair shops and fleet operators that will further enhance our presence and growth in the commercial vehicle aftermarket.
The next largest group, representing approximately 9% of sales (9% in 2011)2012), consists of trailer manufacturers. Trailer manufacturers are also a fragmented group of local or regional players with great diversity in business size, focus and operation. Smaller trailer manufacturers are highly dependent on suppliers such as WABCO to provide technical expertise and product knowledge. Similar to truck and bus OEMs, trailer manufacturers rely heavily on our products for important safety functions and superior technology.
The smallest group, representing approximately 4% of sales (4% in 2011)2012), consists of car and SUV manufacturers to whom WABCO sells electronic air suspension systems and vacuum pumps. Electronic air suspension is a luxury feature with increasing penetration and above market growth. Vacuum pumps are used with diesel and gasoline direct injection (“GDI”)(GDI) engines and, therefore, enjoy higher than average growth rates associated with increasing diesel and GDI applications in Europe, Asia and North America. These customers are typically large, global and sophisticated customers who demand high product quality and overall service levels.
We address our customers through a global sales force that is organized around key accounts and customer groups and interfaces with product marketing and management to identify opportunities and meet customer needs across our product portfolio.
Europe represented approximately 60%61% of our sales in 20122013 (62%60% in 2011)2012), the remainder coming primarily from Asia and the Americas. Our products are also manufactured in Europe, Asia and the Americas. The growth in Asia is being enhanced by our strong roots in China and India where we have achieved leading positions in the marketplace through increasingly close connectivity to customers. We are further strengthened in Asia by an outstanding network of suppliers, manufacturing sites and engineering hubs.
| | WABCO SALES | | By Geography | FY 2011 % of Sales | FY 2012 % of Sales | By Major End-Market | FY 2011 % of Sales | FY 2012 % of Sales | FY 2013 % of Sales | FY 2012 % of Sales | | By Major End-Market | FY 2013 % of Sales | FY 2012 % of Sales |
| Europe | 62 | % | 60 | % | Truck & Bus Products (OEMs) | 64 | % | 62 | % | 61 | % | 60 | % | | Truck & Bus Products (OEMs) | 62 | % | 62 | % |
| Asia | 19 | % | 20 | % | Aftermarket | 23 | % | 25 | % | 18 | % | 20 | % | | Aftermarket | 25 | % | 25 | % |
| North America | 9 | % | 11 | % | Trailer Products | 9 | % | 9 | % | 11 | % | 11 | % | | Trailer Products | 9 | % | 9 | % |
| South America | 7 | % | 6 | % | Car Products | 4 | % | 4 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | | Car Products | 4 | % | 4 | % |
| Other | 3 | % | 3 | % | | | 3 | % | 3 | % | | | |
Backlog
Information on our backlog is set forth under Item 7. “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Backlog” of this annual report.
Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business
Information on the cyclical and seasonal nature of our business is set forth under Item 7 “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business” of this annual report.
Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy is focused on four key platforms, helping further differentiation in the market place: technology innovation, geographic expansion, aftermarket growth and opportunistic automotive application of our products and systems. Drivers of growth for both our aftermarket and advanced car systems are discussed in “Customers” above.
Technology
WABCO is focused on global technology trends that are relevant to our customers. Our technology strategy has two pillars to create value for manufacturers of commercial vehicles in every region of the world. One technology pillar is advanced safety and driver effectiveness to reduce the number of accidents involving commercial vehicles. The other technology pillar is vehicle efficiency to improve the environmental sustainability of trucks, buses and trailers.
We continue to drive growth by utilizing our industry-leading expertise in developing electronically controlled systems, including braking, transmission automation, air suspension and air management systems. We have a strong track record of innovation and are responsible for some of the industry's most important innovations including:
First heavy-duty truck ABS;
First electronically controlled air suspension (ECAS) system for commercial vehicles;
First commercial vehicle automated manual transmission (AMT) controls system;
First electronic stability control (ESC) system for commercial vehicles;
First collision safety system with active braking developed for the North American market, based on Adaptive Cruise Control technology (ACC); and
First AEBS for commercial vehicles, for collision imminent situations with moving or stopped vehicles.
First adoption of Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) integrated with Electronic Stability Control (ESC) into series production
We continue to expand our product and technology portfolio by introducing new products and functionalities, and by improving the penetration of recently launched technologies. Advanced products and functionalities are typically developed and adopted first in Europe and then migrate to North America and Asia. Important examples include the adoption of ABS and automated transmission systems that were first widely adopted in European markets before starting to penetrate North America and Asia. WABCO expended approximately $119.4 million in 2013, $104.3 million in 2012 and $105.1 million in 2011 and $85.9 million in 2010 for product engineering costs which include research activities and product development costs.
We are also focused on longer-term opportunities, particularly in the area of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). ADAS is a technology concept that involves connecting advanced sensors with truck control devices, such as braking
and steering systems as well as engine controls, to improve safety and avoid collisions. In 2012, we introduced OnLane, an innovative lane departure warning system (LDWS) for trucks and buses. OnLane increases vehicle safety by providing the
driver with visual and acoustic warnings or an optional seat-vibration warning, in case of unintentional lane departure. OnLane is fully compliant with the European Union's regulation that requires LDWS on new trucks and buses as of November 2013. Also in 2012, we acquired Ephicas, a pioneering company in the field of aerodynamic solutions for commercial vehicles. We are developing a range of aerodynamic products, branded OptiFlow™, that are designed to increase vehicle efficiency and reduce fuel consumption for trucks, trailers and buses. In 2011, we signed contracts with major European commercial vehicle manufacturers to deliver our new breakthrough c-comp™ clutchable air compressor technology. The c-comp technology optimally disengages a truck or bus air compressor from the engine when the vehicle’s air system reaches full pressure, allowing for fuel savings up to 264 gallons (1,000 liters) on long haul applications while reducing the vehicle’s carbon dioxide emissions. In 2010, we presented our breakthrough OnGuardPLUS™ technology, an advanced AEBS. OnGuardPLUS is the commercial vehicle industry's first system in compliance with the European Union's regulation to make AEBS mandatory on new heavy commercial vehicles beginning in November 2013. Using a single radar sensor and proprietary algorithms, OnGuardPLUS systems became available beginning in 2012 for trucks and buses worldwide.
Geographic Expansion
We continue to drive sales inAmericas
2013 was the high growth markets of Eastern Europe, China, India and Brazil. In Eastern Europe, we have been manufacturing products since 2001. The market in Eastern Europe has historically experienced rapid growth, and we have established relationships with local customers.
Americas
During 2012,first full year that WABCO further globalized our senior management team by creating the position ofhad a President of the Americas. ThisAmericas, a position which was created in March 2012 to further focus on business expansion and enhancement of our positioning, particularly in the North American market. Based in Detroit, Michigan, this new role further demonstrates WABCO’s commitment to the commercial vehicle industry in North and South America withleveraging and synergizing all our well anchoredwell-anchored local capabilities inand distribution channels for our vehicle safety and efficiency. Withinefficiency products and services. In Detroit, during 2013, WABCO North America’s engineering and new product development center expanded its capabilities for local applications. In 2013, the Americas,Company further expanded its relationship with Daimler Trucks North America (DTNA) as WABCO’s OnLane™ safety technology, a lane departure warning system, became available on selected models of trucks made by DTNA. In 2013, WABCO’s OnGuard™ collision mitigation system, the first with active braking in North America, expanded its market adoption among major commercial vehicle makers and national fleets. WABCO’s ECAS system also expanded its customer base in 2013, and ECAS won two major industry awards as a “top” technology.
In South America, the Company is the market leader for ABS, ESC and a range of other WABCO technologies. Brazil isremains a long-term growth market for WABCO due to its expected volume of truck and bus production and the increasing adoption of advanced technology from commercial vehicles. For example, thevehicle safety and efficiency technologies. WABCO Brazil has more than 30 years of ABS experience and a leading position to help vehicle manufacturers comply with Brazilian federal government has mandatedlegislation that anti-lock braking systems will be compulsorymandates ABS on all new trucks, buses and trailers in a phased approach starting in 2013as of January 2014 to further increase road safety. Also in 2010,Headquartered near São Paulo, WABCO celebrated its 30th anniversary in Brazil where the company is well anchored and has substantially advanced its local capabilities to integrate WABCO's technologies, product engineering and lean manufacturing within our global organization. WABCO's potential for growth in South America is due to our abilityserves as a regional hub in Brazil to leverage globalthe manufacturing and sales network of WABCO products and systems. It also has a world-class production facility and a distribution center in the Campinas region. WABCO South America’s enhanced capabilities include product and applications engineering, aftermarket service, supply chain management and support capabilities while deepening our connectivity with customers in the region. WABCOmanufacturing. The Company respects the specific needs of customers in South America through specially developed and locally adapted systems and products for emerging markets.
China
China isremains a key long-term growth market for us. TheWABCO due to its expected volume of truck and bus production and the increasing adoption of more advanced braking,vehicle safety and other related systems is increasingefficiency technologies. In 2013, the Company further strengthened its position as market leader in China, and the number of trucks built in the country is expected to continue to increase in the longer term. We areChina. For example, as the leading provider of advanced systems like ABS, with a strong brand and established customer relationships. We were honored with nine top supplier awards by seven leading Chinese manufacturers of commercial vehicles, in recognition of our superior performance in 2012. Near term growth will be driven by introducing other new products into the local market such as our advanced air compressors and our new generation air disc brakes, clutch servos and automated manual transmission (AMT) systems. In the medium term, we areCompany is well positioned to take advantage of growth driven by the continued enforcement in China of existing regulations making ABS mandatory on trucks, buses and trailers, as well as additional future regulations to cover more classes of vehicles. Based in Shanghai, WABCO China has also been recertified as a high technology enterprise by the government authorities. In 2011,2010, we enteredbecame one of the first global suppliers in the automotive and commercial vehicle industry to obtain such certification in China, and the Company remains one of the few in its field with this official status. It reaffirms our position in China as the supplier of choice for control systems for trucks, buses and trailers. It also confirms how we have continued to expand our local capabilities while also investing in research, development and manufacturing resources in China. Customers value WABCO’s local capabilities for product application development and engineering as our strategy is to “design for China.” This strategy delivers optimal localized solutions to improve vehicle safety and efficiency, enhance driver effectiveness and sustain environmental friendliness. Also in 2013, WABCO acquired the remaining shares in its Chinese joint venture, Shandong Weiming Automotive Products (SWAP) located in Jinan, thus increasing WABCO’s ownership from 70% to 100%. SWAP has grown into a long term agreementleading supplier of technologies and systems for major manufacturers of trucks, buses and trailers in China also leveraging its capabilities to export to other countries in Asia and Europe. SWAP is now the Company’s third wholly owned factory in China. WABCO’s fourth factory in China is a majority-owned joint venture with Shaanxi Fast Gear Company, Ltd., China'sFUWA, the world's largest manufacturer of heavy duty transmissions, to develop and supply WABCO's OptiDriveTM system, further illustrating our ability to grow in this market. To serve the growing demand for products both in China and for export, we have four facilities to manufacture conventional products, advanced systems such as ABS, and new modular air compressors. The latest factory was built to more closely support the partnership with CNHTC, our largest customer in China.commercial trailer axles. In addition, we built a facility in the Southern part of China to produce air disc brakes as part of the joint venture formed in December 2008 with Guangdong FUWA Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (FUWA).
India
India is another growth market for us due to its expected volume of truck production and increasing adoption of advanced technology from commercial vehicle manufacturers. Weparticipate in this market through WABCO INDIA, which we took a majority ownership position in during the second quarter of 2009, further strengthening the Company's already well-anchored position in India. In 2012, we inaugurated our second world-class manufacturing facility at Mahindra World City in Chennai, which manufactures leading technologies and innovative products to supply commercial vehicle manufacturers in Germany, Japan, Poland, and the United States, among other markets internationally. With four world class factories in India, we are the market leader in compressed air related products and systems. We leverage this enviable position to introduce increasingly advanced technologies like ABS advanced braking or OptiDrive automated manual transmission control systems. India also
provides2013, WABCO continued to expand its global remanufacturing capability as it was granted a strong baselicense to remanufacture air compressors in China for sourcingcommercial and engineering activities,off-highway vehicles. WABCO Reman Solutions is the first and only supplier in China authorized to conduct this type of remanufacturing activity. It serves major global truck maker CNHTC as well as customers in China’s independent aftermarket. WABCO Reman Solutions expects to expand its business scope in China, providing further value for end-of-life product management while also enabling environmental sustainability.
India
India remains a long-term growth market for the Company due to its expected volume of truck and bus production and the increasing adoption of vehicle safety and efficiency technologies. We participate in this market through WABCO India, in which we are actively developing.took a 75% majority ownership position during the second quarter of 2009, further strengthening our already well-anchored position in India. In 2013, we opened a new factory in Lucknow in the proximity of a large manufacturing site for TATA Trucks. WABCO INDIAIndia now has five world-class manufacturing sites located in Ambattur, Jamshedpur, Mahindra World City, Pantnagar and Lucknow. In 2013, WABCO India further strengthened its position as market leader in conventional braking products, advanced braking systems, air-assisted products, and automated manual transmission systems. WABCO India serves global original equipment manufacturers based both in India and in other regions of the world. For example, the Company’s factory in Chennai manufactures leading technologies and cost-effective products to supply commercial vehicle manufacturers in Japan, Europe, Russia and the United States, among other markets internationally. We leverage the Company’s track record of 50 years in India to promote increasingly advanced technologies such as anti-lock braking systems (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC), which can significantly reduce the number of accidents involving commercial vehicles on India’s roads. In 2013, we expanded our test track in Chennai to satisfy increased demand from customers across Asia, particularly for trials to support ABS compliance. WABCO India is also a market leader in its domestic aftermarket through an extensive national distribution network and is recognized by major customers and numerous industry organizations for its excellence in engineering and manufacturing. It also leads the adaptation of WABCO’s global technology portfolio to meet the technical and economic needs of customers in emerging markets around the world. In addition, WABCO India is a sourcing hub for our global operations by purchasing raw materials locally at best cost and it providesproviding precision machining capabilities to process the metals, castings and electrical motors that are used in our other factories in Europe, North America, Brazil and China to manufacturemake our products. Also in 2013, WABCO INDIA is also aIndia further enhanced its center of mechanical and software engineering activity thatdevelopment which provides a source of high quality skills at very competitive cost to develop software and mechanical systems tocosts in support of WABCO globally.
Eastern Europe
Eastern Europe is another long-term growth market for the Company. Truck and bus production in Eastern Europe is mainly in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), which includes Russia as its major market. Headquartered in Moscow, WABCO Russia has 5 sales offices and more than 110 Service Partners across the country as of 2013. From its distribution center in Moscow, WABCO supplies local makers of trucks, trailers and buses, as well as aftermarket customers in the CIS. In particular,2013, WABCO INDIAconfirmed its market leadership in Russia. The Company expanded its relationship with GAZ Group, Russia’s largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles. The Company also expanded its business with KAMAZ, another major maker of commercial vehicles. In the second quarter of 2013, WABCO’s factory in Miass, Russia, made its first delivery of products, including braking components and parts. WABCO has been serving markets within the expertise to develop products that satisfy emerging markets expectations and specificity.CIS for more than 40 years.
Competition
Given the importance of technological leadership, vehicle life-cycle expertise, reputation for quality and reliability, and the growing joint collaboration between OEMs and suppliers to drive new product development, the space in which we mostly operate has not historically had a large number of competitors. Our principal competitors are Knorr-Bremse (Knorr's U.S. subsidiary is Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems) and, in certain categories, Haldex. In the advanced electronics categories, automotive players such as Bosch (automotive) and Continental (including Siemens-VDO) have recently been present in some commercial vehicle applications. In the mechanical product categories, several Asian competitors are emerging, primarily in China, who are focused on such products. In each of our product categories, we compete on the basis of price, manufacturing and distribution capabilities, product quality and reliability, product design, delivery and service.
Manufacturing and Operations
Most of our manufacturing sites and distribution centers produce and/or house a broad range of products and serve all different types of customers. Currently, over 68%approximately 69% of our manufacturing workforce is located in best cost countries such as China, India, Brazil and Poland up from approximately 10%45% in 1999.2007. Facilities in best cost countries have historically helped reduce costs on the simpler and more labor-intensive products, while the facilities in Western Europe are focused on producing more technologically advanced products. However, the increasing need for more advanced products and systems in emerging markets leads us to expand local supply chain capabilities to progressively cover more complex manufacturing. All
facilities globally are deploying Six Sigma Lean initiatives to improve service level and generate productivity. By applying the Six Sigma philosophy and tools we seek to improve quality and predictability of our processes. Lean is geared towards eliminating waste in our supply chain, manufacturing and administrative processes. Both methodologies are customer driven and data based. In addition, our global supply chain team makes decisions on where to manufacture which products taking into account such factors as local and export demand, customer approvals, cost, key supplier locations and factory capabilities.
Our global sourcing organization purchases a wide variety of components including electrical, electro-mechanical, cast aluminum products and steel, as well as copper, rubber and plastic containing components that represent a substantial portion of manufacturing costs. We source products on a global basis from three key regions: Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe and Asia. To support the continuing shift of manufacturing to best cost countries, we also continue to shift more of our sourcing to best cost regions. Under the leadership of the global sourcing organization, which is organized around commodity and product groups, we identify and develop key suppliers and seek to integrate them as partners into our extended enterprise. Many of our Western European suppliers are accompanying us on our move to best cost countries. Since 1999,2007, the share of our sourcing from best cost regions has increased from 10%36% to approximately 39%41%.
We have developed a strong position in the design, development, engineering and testing of products, components and systems. We are generally regarded in the industry as a systems expert, having in-depth technical knowledge and capabilities to support the development of advanced technology applications. Key customers depend on us and will typically involve us very early in the development process as they begin designing next generation platforms. We have approximately 1,6311,644 employees dedicated to developing new products, components and systems as well as supporting and enhancing current applications and manufacturing processes. Our sales organization hosts application engineers that are based near customers in all regions around the world and are partially resident at some customer locations. We also have significant resources in best cost countries performing functions such as drawings, testing and software component development. We operate test tracks in Germany, Finland (for extreme weather test conditions) and India.
Joint Ventures
We use joint ventures globally to expand and enhance our access to customers. Our important joint ventures are:
A majority-owned joint venture (90%) in Japan with Sanwa-Seiki (WABCO Japan, Inc.) that distributes WABCO's products in the local market.
A majority-owned (70%) partnership in the U.S.United States with Cummins Engine Co. (WABCO Compressor Manufacturing Co.), a manufacturing partnership formed to produce air compressors designed by WABCO.
A majority-owned joint venture (70%) in China with Mingshui Automotive Fitting Factory (MAFF) that provides conventional mechanical products to the local market.
A majority-owned joint venture (70%) with Guangdong FUWA Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., (“FUWA”)(FUWA) to produce air disc brakes for commercial trailers in China. FUWA is the largest manufacturer of commercial trailer axles in China and in the world.
A 50% owned joint venture in Germany with Wurth Group (WABCOWURTH Workshop Services GmbH) that supplies commercial vehicle workshops, fleet owners and operators and end users internationally with multi-brand technology diagnostic systems.
A 50% owned joint venture in North America with ArvinMeritor Brake Holdings, LLCMeritor, Inc. (Meritor WABCO) that markets ABS and other vehicle control products.
A minority equity investment in a49% owned joint venture in South Africa where we have a 49% ownership joint venture with Sturrock & Robson Ltd (WABCO SA), a distributor of braking systems products.
Employees
We have 10,65710,860 employees. Approximately 48%49% of our employees are salaried and 52%51% are hourly. Approximately 51%52% of our workforce is in Europe, 42%41% is in Asia, and the remaining 7% is in the Americas. Approximately 1,631 employees work in engineering/product development.
Employees located in our sites in Europe, Asia and South America are subject to collective bargaining, with internal company agreements or external agreements or laws at the region or country level. Currently 55% of our workforce is covered by collective bargaining agreements. The employees' right to strike is typically protected by law and union membership is confidential information which does not have to be provided to the employer. The collective bargaining agreements are typically renegotiated on an annual basis. Our U.S. facilities are non-union. We have maintained good relationships with our employees around the world and historically have experienced very few work stoppages. In October 2012, we faced a three-week strike in Brazil due to a regional union action organized around the annual salary increase negotiation. This action was targeted against all companies active in the region in which we operate.
Intellectual Property
Patents and other proprietary rights are important to our business. We also rely upon trade secrets, manufacturing know-how, continuing technological innovations, and licensing opportunities to maintain and improve our competitive position. We review third-party proprietary rights, including patents and patent applications, as available, in an effort to develop an effective intellectual property strategy, avoid infringement of third-party proprietary rights, identify licensing opportunities, and monitor the intellectual property claims of others.
We own a large portfolio of patents that principally relate to our products and technologies, and we have, from time to time, licensed some of our patents. Patents for individual products and processes extend for varying periods according to the date of patent filing or grant and the legal term of patents in various countries where patent protection is obtained.
The WABCO brand is also protected by trademark registrations throughout the world in the key markets in which our products are sold.
While we consider our patents and trademarks to be valuable assets, we do not believe that our competitive position is materially dependent upon any single patent or group of related patents. At the same time, we recognize that technical leadership is an ongoing pillar of success and our intellectual property portfolio will continue to grow in importance for the company as a whole as a result. The risks associated with successful patent prosecution and defense, trademark protection and the exploitation and protection of other intellectual property rights accordingly is something that we continue to focus on.
Environmental Regulation
Our operations are subject to local, state, federal and foreign environmental laws and regulations that govern activities or operations that may have adverse environmental effects and which impose liability for clean-up costs resulting from past spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous wastes and environmental compliance. Generally, the international requirements that impact the majority of our operations tend to be no more restrictive than those in effect in the U.S.United States.
Throughout the world, we have been dedicated to being an environmentally responsible manufacturer, neighbor and employer. We have a number of proactive programs under way to minimize our impact on the environment and believe that we are in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Manufacturing facilities are audited on a regular basis. Fourteen
Sixteen of our manufacturing facilitiessites have Environmental Management Systems (EMS), which have been certified as ISO 14001 compliant. These facilitiessites are those located in:
|
| | |
Claye-Souilly, France | Campinas, Brazil | Mannheim, Germany | Stanowice, Poland |
| Jinan, China (2 plants) | Ambattur, India | Wroclaw, Poland |
Gronau, Germany | Hanover, Germany | Jinan, China |
Ambattur, India | Pyungtaek, Korea | Qingdao, China |
Meppel, Netherlands | Mannheim, GermanyJamshedpur, India | Charleston, United States |
| Claye-Souilly, France | Mahindra World City, India | Rochester Hills, United States |
| Hanover, Germany | Meppel, Netherlands | Pyungtaek, Korea |
| Gronau, Germany | | |
A number of our facilities are undertaking responsive actions to address groundwater and soil issues. Expenditures in 20122013 to evaluate and remediate these sites were not material.
Additional sites may be identified for environmental remediation in the future, including properties previously transferred and with respect to which the Company may have contractual indemnification obligations.
Available Information
Our web site is located at www.wabco-auto.com. Our periodic reports and all amendments to those reports required to be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through the web site. During the period covered by this report, we posted our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those documents to our web site as soon as such reports were filed or furnished electronically with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”)(SEC). We will continue to post to our web site such reports and amendments as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC.
The Separation of WABCO from Trane
The spin-off by Trane of its Vehicle Control Systems business became effective on July 31, 2007, through a distribution of 100% of the common stock of WABCO to Trane's shareholders (the “Distribution”)Distribution). The Distribution was effected through a separation and distribution agreement pursuant to which Trane distributed all of the shares of WABCO common stock as a dividend
on Trane common stock, in the amount of one share of WABCO common stock for every three shares of outstanding Trane common stock to each shareholder on the record date. Trane received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and an opinion from tax counsel indicating that the spin-off was tax free to the shareholders of Trane and WABCO. Please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” below for information on the tax risks associated with the spin-off from Trane.
Code of Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, including all executive officers and senior financial officers and directors, is posted on our web site www.wabco-auto.com. The Code of Conduct and Ethics is compliant with Item 406 of SEC Regulation S-K and the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Any changes to the Code of Conduct and Ethics that affect the provisions required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K will also be disclosed on the web site.
Any waivers of the Code of Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers, directors or senior financial officers must be approved by our Audit Committee and those waivers, if any are ever granted, would be disclosed on our web site under the caption “Exemptions to the Code of Conduct and Ethics.” There have been no waivers to the Code of Conduct and Ethics.
Recent Events
On February 12, 2014, WABCO Europe BVBA (WABCO Europe), a Belgian subsidiary of the Company, entered into a stock purchase agreement (the Agreement) with Creafund Transics Shares Stille Maatschap, Mr. Ludwig Lemenu, Mr. Walter Mastelinck, Cassel BVBA and Uniholding SA (collectively, the “Sellers”) by which WABCO Europe purchased all of the outstanding shares of Tavares NV (Tavares), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Belgium, from the Sellers for a purchase price of €111.1 million, which included the acquisition of €15.3 million of net cash held by Transics International, resulting in net consideration of €95.8 million.
Tavares holds 96.84% of the outstanding shares of Transics International NV (Transics), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Belgium currently listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. Transics develops and markets fleet management solutions to help commercial vehicle manufacturers and fleet operators to more efficiently and safely manage their trucks and trailers. The suite of innovative solutions offered by Transics helps to improve fuel efficiency and productivity while lowering operating costs. In connection with the acquisition of Tavares, WABCO Europe will make a mandatory public offer to acquire the remaining shares and warrants issued by Transics in accordance with applicable Belgian takeover rules.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Any of the following factors could have a material adverse affecteffect on our future operating results as well as other factors included in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Information Concerning Forward Looking Statements.”
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our sales could decline due to macro-economic factors, cyclicality of the industry, regulatory changes and other factors outside of our control.
Changes in economic conditions, cyclical downturns in our industry, regulatory changes impacting the purchasing patterns of commercial vehicles, and changes in the local economies of the countries or regions in which we sell our products, such as changes in consumer confidence, increases in interest rates and increases in unemployment, could affect demand for our products, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Demand for new trucks and buses in the markets in which we operate has a significant impact on our sales. In 2012,2013, heavy truck and bus production has decreasedremained relatively flat year on year in Europe, our largest market which accounted for approximately 60%61% of our total sales. Adverse economic conditions in our markets, particularly in Europe, and other factors may cause our customers to reduce truck and bus production, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A global recession would negatively impact our customers and result in reduced demand for our products, which would therefore have a significant negative impact on our business.
During the recent global recession, the credit markets experienced a period of unprecedented turmoil and upheaval characterized by significantly reduced availability of credit and increased borrowing costs. The disruptions in the credit markets and impacts of the global recession negatively impacted consumer spending patterns and caused our customers to reduce truck and bus production. During 2012, the commercial vehicle industry experienced an abrupt slowdown to the significant recovery seen in 2010 and 2011 in our more developed markets, in addition to double digit declines in some of our emerging markets, namely Brazil and China. A further or "double dip" global recession could cause our customers to again reduce truck and bus production, which would have a negative impact on our business and results of operations, our operating cash flows and our financial condition.
Our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on cross border transactions and the translation of local currency results into U.S. dollarsDollars could negatively impact our results of operations.
We conduct business through subsidiaries in many different countries, including most of the major countries of Western Europe, Brazil, Poland, China, South Korea, India and Japan, and fluctuations in currency exchange rates have a significant impact on the reported results of our operations, which are presented in U.S. dollars.Dollars. In 2012,2013, approximately 89%89.1% of our combined sales occurred outside of the United States. A significant and growing portion of our products are manufactured in best-cost countries and sold in various countries. Cross border transactions, both with external parties and intercompany relationships, result in exposure to foreign currency exchange effects. Accordingly, significant unfavorable changesfluctuations in the currency exchange rates could negatively impact our results of operations, especially fluctuations in the exchange rates of the euro, U.S. dollar and other applicable currencies could negatively impact our results of operations.for the countries referred to above. Additionally, our results of operations are translated into U.S. dollarsDollars for reporting purposes. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollarDollar results in unfavorable or favorable translation effects as the results of foreign locations are translated into U.S. dollars.Dollars.
Our future annual effective tax rate could vary significantly as a result of changes in the mix of earnings or losses and other factors.
Our overall effective tax rate is equal to our total tax expense as a percentage of our total profit or loss before tax. However, tax expenses and benefits are determined separately for each tax paying entity or group of entities that is consolidated for tax purposes in each jurisdiction. A substantial majority of our profits are earned in jurisdictions with a lower rate than the U.S. statutory rate. Losses in certain jurisdictions may provide no current financial statement tax benefit. As a result, changes in the mix of profits and losses between jurisdictions, as well as changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws or rulings, among other factors, could have a significant impact on our overall effective tax rate.
The value of our deferred tax assets could become impaired, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately $139.1 million in net deferred tax assets. These deferred tax assets include net operating loss carryovers that can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce income taxes payable in those future periods. Each quarter, we determine the probability of the realization of deferred tax assets, using significant judgments and estimates with respect to, among other things, historical operating results and expectations of future earnings and tax planning strategies. If we determine in the future that there is insufficient evidence to support the valuation of these assets, due to the risk factors described herein or other factors, we may be required to record or further adjust up or down a valuation allowance to revalue our deferred tax assets. Such a revaluation could result in material non-cash expense or income in the period in which the valuation allowance is adjusted and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are subject to general risks associated with our foreign operations.
In addition to the currency exchange risks inherent in operating in many different foreign countries, there are other risks inherent in our international operations.
The risks related to our foreign operations that we more often face in the normal course of business include:
changes in non-U.S. tax law, increases in non-U.S. tax rates and the amount of non-U.S. earnings relative to total combined earnings could change and impact our combined tax rate;
foreign earnings may be subject to withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, price or exchange controls, or other restrictions;
general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate may have an adverse effect on our operations in those countries;
we may have difficulty complying with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, some of which may conflict with United States law, and the uncertainty created by this legal environment could limit our ability to effectively enforce our rights in certain markets; and
in several of the countries in which we do business, we rely upon the ongoing performance of our joint venture partners who bear risks similar to our risks and also may include obligations they have under related shareholders' agreements and risk of being denied access to the capital markets which could lead to resource demands on the Company in order to maintain or advance its strategy.
The ability to manage these risks could be difficult and may limit our operations and make the manufacture and distribution of our products internationally more difficult, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
We purchase components and parts containing base metals and other commodities. If we are unable to obtain componentsuch components and parts or obtain them at reasonable price levels due to fluctuations in the costs of the underlying raw materials, our ability to maintain existing sales margins may be affected.
We purchase a broad range of materials and components and parts throughout the world in connection with our manufacturing activities. Major items include electronic components and parts containing aluminum, steel, copper, zinc, rubber and plastics. The cost of components and parts, andwhich reflect the cost of the raw materials used therein, represents a significant portion of our total costs. Price increases of the underlying commodities may adversely affect our results of operations. Although we maintain alternative sources for components and parts, our business is subject to the risk of price fluctuations and periodic delays in the delivery of certain raw materials.materials to our suppliers. The sudden inability of a supplier to deliver components or to do so at reasonable prices could have a temporary adverse effect on our production of certain products or the cost at which we can produce those products. AnyIn addition, any change in the supply or price of raw materials could materially adversely affect our future business and results of operations.
If we are not able to maintain good relations with our employees, we could suffer work stoppages that could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Employees located in our sites in Europe, Asia and South America are subject to collective bargaining, with internal company agreements or external agreements at the region or country level. Currently 55% of our workforce is covered by collective bargaining agreements. These employees' right to strike is typically protected by law and union membership is confidential information which does not have to be provided to the employer. Our U.S. facilities are non-union. Any disputes
with our employee base could result in work stoppages or labor protests, which could disrupt our operations. Any such labor disputes could negatively affect our business and results of operations. In October 2012, we faced a three-week strike in Brazil due to a regional union action organized around the annual salary increase negotiation. This action was targeted against all companies active in the region in which we operate.
We are dependent on key customers.
We rely on several key customers. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012,2013, sales to our top three customers accounted for approximately 11%12% (Daimler), 10% (Volvo) and 7% (Meritor WABCO, - our 50%-owned joint venture in North America), respectively, of our sales, and sales to our top ten customers accounted for approximately 52% of our sales. Many of our customers place orders for products on an as-needed basis and operate in cyclical industries and, as a result, their order levels have varied from period to period in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Such customer orders are dependent upon their markets and customers and may be subject to delays or cancellations. As a result of dependence on our key customers, we have experienced and could experience in the future a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations if any of the following were to occur:
•the loss of any key customer, in whole or in part;
•a declining market in which customers reduce orders or demand reduced prices; or
•a strike or work stoppage at a key customer facility, which could affect both its suppliers and customers.
We are subject to price reduction demands from our OEM customers. These price reductions could adversely affect the results of our operations
Downward pricing pressure is a characteristic of the automotive industry, and as with other suppliers to commercial vehicle OEMs, we continue to experience price reduction demands from our customers. In the face of lower prices to customers, we must reduce our operating costs in order to maintain profitability. Whilst we have successfully implemented cost reduction initiatives, we anticipate our customers will continue to pursue aggressive pricing strategies. Customers may also request that we pay for design, engineering and tooling costs that are incurred prior to the start of production and recover these costs through amortization in the piece price of the applicable component. If the Company is unable to offset customer price reductions through improved operating efficiencies, new manufacturing processes, sourcing
alternatives, technology enhancements and other initiatives, if a given program is not launched or is launched with significantly lower volumes than planned, or if we are unable to avoid price reductions from our customers, the results of our operations could be adversely affected.
If there are changes in the environmental or other regulations that affect one or more of our current or future products, it could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.
We are currently subject to various environmental and other regulations in the U.S.United States and internationally. A risk of environmental liability is inherent in our current and former manufacturing activities. Under certain environmental laws, we could be held jointly and severally responsible for the remediation of any hazardous substance contamination at our past and present facilities and at third party waste disposal sites and could also be held liable for damages to natural resources and any consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other environmental damage. While we have a number of proactive programs underway to minimize the impact of the production and use of our products on the environment and believe that we are in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations, we cannot predict whether there will be changes in the environmental regulations affecting our products.
Any changes in the environmental and other regulations which affect our current or future products could have a negative impact on our business if we are unable to adjust our product offering to comply with such regulatory changes. In addition, it is possible that we will incur increased costs as a result of complying with environmental regulations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may be subject to product liability, warranty and recall claims, which may increase the costs of doing business and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a risk of product liability or warranty claims if our products actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected or the use of our products results, or are alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. While we maintain reasonable limits of insurance coverage to appropriately respond to such exposures, large product liability claims, if made, could exceed our insurance coverage limits and insurance may not continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. We cannot assure you that we will not incur significant costs to defend these claims or that we will not experience any product liability losses in the future. In addition, if any of our designed products are or are alleged to be defective, we may be required to participate in recalls and exchanges of such products. In the past five years, our warranty expense has fluctuated between approximately 1.1%0.8% and 1.6% of sales on an annual basis. Individual quarters were above or below the annual
averages. The future cost associated with providing product warranties and/or bearing the cost of repair or replacement of our products could exceed our historical experience and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are required to plan our capacity well in advance of production and our success depends on having available capacity and effectively using it.
We principally compete for new business at the beginning of the development of our customers' new products. Our customers' new product development generally begins significantly prior to the marketing and production of their new products and our supply of our products generally lasts for the life of our customers' products. Nevertheless, our customers may move business to other suppliers or request price reductions during the life cycle of a product. The long development and sales cycle of our new products, combined with the specialized nature of many of our facilities and the resulting difficulty in shifting work from one facility to another, could result in variances in capacity utilization. In order to meet our customers' requirements, we may be required to supply our customers regardless of the actual cost to us and consequently we may suffer an adverse impact on our operating profit margins and results of operations.
We must continue to make technological advances, or we may not be able to successfully compete in our industry.
We operate in an industry in which technological advancements are necessary to remain competitive. Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to improve already technologically complex products and to remain a leader in technological innovation. However, if we fail to continue to make technological improvements or our competitors develop technologically superior products, it could have an adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, is currently unable to inspect the audit work and practices of auditors operating in Belgium, including our auditor.
Our auditors, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA/Reviseurs d'Entreprises SCCRL, are registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Our auditors, like any other independent registered public accounting firms operating in Belgium, are not permitted, because of Belgian law restrictions, to be subject to inspections by the PCAOB that
assess their compliance with U.S. law and professional standards in connection with performance of audits of financial statements filed with the SEC. As a result, our investors may not realize the potential benefits of such inspections.
Risks Relating to the Separation
We have agreed to indemnify Trane for taxes and related losses resulting from certain actions that may cause the Distribution to fail to qualify as a tax-free transaction.
Trane has received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS substantially to the effect that the Distribution qualifies as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code (“the Code”)(the Code). In addition, Trane has received an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, tax counsel to Trane, substantially to the effect that the Distribution will qualify as tax-free to Trane, us and our shareholders under Section 355 and related provisions of the Code. The ruling and opinion were based on, among other things, certain assumptions as well as on the accuracy of certain factual representations and statements made by Trane and us. In rendering its ruling, the IRS also relied on certain covenants that WABCO and Trane entered into, including the adherence to certain restrictions on Trane's and WABCO's future actions.
Notwithstanding receipt by Trane of the private letter ruling and the opinion of counsel, the IRS could assert that the Distribution should be treated as a taxable transaction. If the Distribution fails to qualify for tax-free treatment, then Trane would recognize a gain in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of our common stock distributed to the Trane shareholders over (ii) Trane's tax basis in such common stock. Under the terms of the Tax Sharing Agreement, in the event the Distribution were to fail to qualify as a tax-free reorganization and such failure was not the result of actions taken after the distribution by Trane or any of its subsidiaries or shareholders, we would be responsible for all taxes imposed on Trane as a result thereof. In addition, each Trane shareholder who received our common stock in the Distribution generally would be treated as having received a taxable Distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of our common stock received (including any fractional share sold on behalf of the shareholder), which would be taxable as a dividend to the extent of the shareholder's ratable share of Trane's current and accumulated earnings and profits (as increased to reflect any current income including any gain recognized by Trane on the taxable distribution). The balance, if any, of the Distribution would be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the Trane shareholder's tax basis in its Trane stock, with any remaining amount being taxed as capital gain. Our obligation to indemnify Trane under the Tax Sharing Agreement if the Distribution fails to
qualify for tax-free treatment could be substantial if triggered, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are responsible for certain of Trane's contingent and other corporate liabilities.
Under the Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement, the Separation and Distribution Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement, our wholly-owned subsidiary WABCO Europe BVBA has assumed and is responsible for certain contingent liabilities related to Trane's business (including certain associated costs and expenses, whether arising prior to, at or after the Distribution) and will indemnify Trane for these liabilities. Among the contingent liabilities against which we will indemnify Trane and the other indemnities, are liabilities associated with certain non-U.S. tax liabilities and certain U.S. and non-U.S. environmental liabilities associated with certain Trane entities.
We will indemnify Trane, Ideal Standard International, including certain former European subsidiaries and affiliates of the former American Standard group, and their respective owners against any fines associated with an investigation into alleged infringement of European Union competition regulations.
As part of a multi-company investigation, American Standard and certain of its European subsidiaries engaged in the Bath and Kitchen business were charged by the European Commission for alleged infringements of European Union competition rules relating to the distribution of bathroom fixtures and fittings in a number of European countries. Pursuant to the Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement, WABCO Europe BVBA (an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of WABCO) will be responsible for, and will indemnify American Standard (now Trane) and Ideal Standard International (including certain subsidiaries engaged, or formerly engaged in the Bath and Kitchen business) and their respective affiliates. As required by the Indemnification and Cooperation agreement, WABCO paid the fine amount into escrow on August 30, 2010 and those funds were subsequently released from escrow and paid to the Commission. After reviewing all of the elements of the case, WABCO decided to appeal the decision in order to try to have the fine reduced. On September 8, 2010, WABCO filed its appeal in the General Court of the European Union, located in Luxembourg. On March 27, 2012, the oral hearing for the appeal took place before the court. This was the final step in the procedure before a judgment is handed down. The Company anticipates that a decision on the appeal will be made before the end of 2013.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Your percentage ownership in WABCO may be diluted in the future.
Your percentage ownership in WABCO may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that have already been granted and that we expect will be granted to our directors and officers in the future under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. In addition, we may in the future issue additional equity securities, subject to limitations imposed by the Tax Sharing Agreement, in order to fund working capital needs, capital expenditures and product development, or to make acquisitions and other investments, which may dilute your ownership interest.
We cannot assure you that we will pay any dividends or repurchase shares.
While we have historically returned value to shareholders in the form of share repurchases and/or dividends, our ability to repurchase shares and pay dividends is limited by available cash, contingent liabilities and surplus. Moreover, all decisions regarding the declaration and payment of dividends and share repurchases will be at the sole discretion of our Board and will be evaluated from time to time in light of our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our business, covenants associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice and other factors that our Board deems relevant.
Our shareholder rights plan and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws, and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:
•a Board of Directors that is divided into three classes with staggered terms;
•elimination of the right of our shareholders to act by written consent;
•rules regarding how shareholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at shareholder meetings;
•the right of our Board to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval; and
•limitations on the right of shareholders to remove directors.
Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
On July 13, 2007, our Board adopted a shareholder rights plan, which provides, among other things, that when specified events occur, our shareholders will be entitled to purchase from us a newly created series of junior preferred stock. The preferred stock purchase rights are triggered by the earlier to occur of (i) ten business days (or a later date determined by our Board of Directors before the rights are separated from our common stock) after the public announcement that a person or group has become an “acquiring person” by acquiring beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock or (ii) ten business days (or a later date determined by our Board
before the rights are separated from our common stock) after a person or group begins a tender or exchange offer that, if completed, would result in that person or group becoming an acquiring person. The issuance of preferred stock pursuant to the shareholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors.
We believe these provisions protect our shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our Board and by providing our Board with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make our company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our Board determines is not in the best interests of our shareholders and our company.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of February 15, 2013, we conducted13, 2014, our manufacturing activities are located at 20 plants21 sites in 1011 countries.
|
| | |
| Site Location | | Major Products Manufactured at Location |
| Campinas, Brazil | | Vehicle control systems |
| Jinan, China (2 plants) | | Braking systems and Compressors |
| Qingdao, China | | Braking systems |
| Taishan, China | | Foundation brakes |
| Claye-Souilly, France | | Vehicle control systems |
| Hanover, Germany | | Vehicle control systems |
| Gronau, Germany | | Compressors and hydraulics |
| Mannheim, Germany | | Foundation brakes |
| Ambattur, India | | Vehicle control systems |
| Jamshedpur, India | | Vehicle control systems |
| Mahindra World City, India | | Vehicle control systems |
| Pantnagar, India | | Vehicle control systems |
Meppel, NetherlandsLucknow, India | | ActuatorsVehicle control systems |
| Pyungtaek, Korea | | Braking systems |
| Meppel, Netherlands | | Actuators |
| Stanowice, Poland | | Remanufactured products |
| Wroclaw, Poland | | Vehicle control systems |
| Miass, Russia | | Actuators and foundation brakes |
| Rayong, Thailand | | Actuators and foundation brakes |
| Charleston, United States | | Compressors |
| Rochester Hills, United States | | Remanufactured products |
We own all of the plants described above, except for Jinan, China; Taishan, China; Claye-Souilly, France; Miass, Russia; Rayong, Thailand; Rochester Hills, U.S. and Charleston, U.S.;, which are leased. Our properties are generally in good condition, are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to carry out our business. In 2012,2013, the manufacturing plants, taken as a whole, met our capacity needs.
We also own or lease warehouse and office space for administrative and sales staff. Our headquarters, located in Brussels, Belgium, and our executive offices, located in Piscataway, New Jersey, are leased.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We may be party to a variety of legal proceedings with respect to environmental related, employee related, product related, and general liability and automotive litigation related matters that arise in the normal course of our business. While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our combined results of operations or financial position. For more information on current legal proceedings, refer to Note 14 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following sets forth certain information as of February 13, 20132014 with respect to each person who is an executive officer of the Company:
|
| | |
| Name | Age | Position(s) |
| Jacques Esculier | 5354 | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
Ulrich MichelJason Campbell | 5037 | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Controller |
Christopher HarrisonRobert de Vaucorbeil | 4656 | Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Nikhil M. Varty | 4849 | President, Americas and Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions |
Todd WeinblattLeon Liu | 4352 | Vice President, and ControllerAsia |
| Vincent Pickering | 4445 | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |
| Michael E. Thompson | 4445 | Vice President, Compression & Braking |
| Nick Rens | 4849 | Vice President, Trailer Systems Aftermarket & Driveline ControlsAftermarket |
Each officer of the Company is appointed by the Board of Directors to a term of office expiring on the date of the first Board meeting after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders next succeeding his or her appointment or such officer's earlier resignation or removal.
Jacques Esculier has served as our Chief Executive Officer and director since July 2007. In May 2009, he was appointed Chairman of our Board of Directors. Prior to July 2007, Mr. Esculier served as Vice President of Trane and President of its Vehicle Control Systems business, a position he had held since January 2004. Prior to holding that position, Mr. Esculier served in the capacity of Business Leader for the Trane Commercial Systems' Europe, Middle East, Africa, India & Asia Region from 2002 through January 2004. Prior to joining Trane in 2002, Mr. Esculier spent more than six years in leadership positions at AlliedSignal/Honeywell. He was Vice President and General Manager of Environmental Control and Power Systems Enterprise based in Los Angeles, and Vice President of Aftermarket Services-Asia Pacific based in Singapore.
Ulrich MichelJason Campbell has served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer since July 2007. PriorOctober 2013, adding to July 2007, Mr. Michel servedhis existing role as Chief Financial Officer of Trane's Vehicle Control Systems business,Controller, a position he hadhas held since April 2005.March 2013. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Campbell served as our Director of Investor Relations. In 2012, he also assumed the role of Finance Leader Americas. Prior to holding that position, Mr. Michel2011, he served in the capacityas our Manager of Chief Financial Officer for the Trane Commercial Systems' Europe, Middle East, Africa & India RegionReporting and Investor Relationships from 2003 through April 2005.2008. Prior to joining TraneWABCO in 2003,2008, Mr. MichelCampbell spent more than six years with American Standard in a variety of corporate accounting and financial leadership positions at AlliedSignal/Honeywell with areas of focus including mergers and acquisitions, the Specialty Chemicals business, and the Control Products business in Europe. Before joining AlliedSignal/Honeywell,reporting positions. Mr. Michel spent eight years at Price Waterhouse.Campbell is a Certified Public Accountant.
Christopher HarrisonRobert de Vaucorbeil has served as our Chief Human Resources Officer since FebruaryNovember 2013. Prior to February 2013,that, Mr. Harrisonde Vaucorbeil served as Vice President, Human Resources for TE Connectivityour Manufacturing, Logistic and Quality HR Director, a position he had held since AprilJuly 2011. Prior to April 2011,joining WABCO, Mr. Harrison served asde Vaucorbeil was the Vice President, Human Resources for ITT CorporationHR and Industrial Excellence Director at Saint Gobain Packaging from October 2010. Prior to2007. Before holding that position, Mr. Harrison spent fourteen years from 1996 at Stanley, Black & Decker where hede Vaucorbeil held a broad range of rolesmanagement positions of increasing responsibility in product development, operations management, product portfolio optimizationresponsibilities at Delphi, ultimately serving as the HR Director of Delphi Powertrain worldwide and Human Resources. These roles included Vice President HR & Business Transformation for EMEA region from March 2007 to August 2008, Vice President, HR & Acquisition Integration for EMEA region from September 2008 to June 2009, President, Stanley Proto Industrial Tools from July 2009 to January 2010, culminating in Mr. Harrison's position as Vice President, Acquisition Integration which he held from September 2009 through September 2010.their Chassis Europe business.
Nikhil M. Varty has served as our President, Americas and Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions since February 2012. Prior to this, Mr. Varty served as Vice President, Compression & Braking since July 2007. Prior to July 2007, Mr. Varty served as Vice President, Compression and Braking of Trane's Vehicle Control Systems business, a position he has held since January 2005. Prior to holding that position, Mr. Varty served in the capacity of Chief Financial Officer of Trane's Vehicle Control Systems business. Prior to joining Trane in June 2001, Mr. Varty had more than 10 years of national and international senior level finance roles with Great Lakes Chemical Corp., AlliedSignal/Honeywell and Coopers & Lybrand.
Todd WeinblattLeon Liu has served as our Vice President, and ControllerAsia since July 2007.January 2005. Prior to July 2007,joining WABCO in 2005, Mr. WeinblattLiu served as Assistant Controllerthe Director of Trane, a position he had held since 2004.Business Planning and Strategy for Asia operations at Visteon Corporation. Before joining Trane, Mr. Weinblatt served as Director-Accounting PolicyVisteon, he held management positions of increasing responsibilities in product development, product launches, program management, corporate strategy and External Reportingbusiness development at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. His prior experience includes six years at
Lucent Technologies Inc., where he was a Senior Manager of Accounting PolicyFord Motor Company and Mergers and Acquisitions. He began his career with Coopers & Lybrand, where he spent five years as an auditor.several Japanese Tier-1 suppliers.
Vincent Pickering has served as our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since September 2010. Prior to joining WABCO, Mr. Pickering served as the Associate General Counsel for the Worldwide Licensing and Pricing Division of
Microsoft Corp., for eight years. Prior to working at Microsoft, Mr. Pickering worked both in-house and in private practice, representing companies across a diverse range of industries that include the telecommunications and energy sectors.
Dr. Michael E. Thompson has served as our Vice President, Compression and Braking since February 2012. Previously, Dr. Thompson held the position of Vice-President Car Systems & Investor Relations since April 2009. Between July 2007 and April 2009, Dr. Thompson served as our Vice President, Strategy and Investor Relations. Prior to July 2007, Dr. Thompson served as Vice President, Marketing and Strategy of Trane's Vehicle Control Systems business, a position he held since August 2005. Prior to joining Trane, Dr. Thompson held positions of increasing responsibility at Honeywell Aerospace from October 1999 through July 2005 ultimately serving as the division's Vice President of Marketing. Prior to joining Honeywell, Dr. Thompson was a consultant with McKinsey & Company from June 1996.
Nick Rens has served as our Vice President, Driveline ControlsAftermarket, since January 2013,November 2008, adding to his existing rolesrole as Vice President, Aftermarket, a position he has held since 2008 and Vice President, Trailer Systems, since 2005. He also assumed the role of Vice President, Driveline Controls, from January 2013 to September 2013. Previously, Mr. Rens worked for three years as our regional trailer sales leader for southern and western Europe based in Claye Souilly, France. Since 1999, Mr. Rens has also been Managing Director of WABCO Belgium where he held several sales leadership roles both in the Aftermarket and Original Equipment (OE) sales organizations. Mr. Rens has worked at the Company for almost his entire career, having joined the company in 1989 as a product line specialist.
PART II
| |
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock is listed on NYSE under the symbol “WBC.” Our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the Company to issue up to 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, all of which have been designated by our Board of Directors as a series of Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. We also have a rights agreement. Pursuant to the rights agreement, when triggered in certain takeover situations, one preferred stock purchase right will be issued for each outstanding share of our common stock.
We estimate that there are approximately 474453 holders of record of the Company's common stock. A significant number of the outstanding shares of common stock which are beneficially owned by individuals or entities are registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company, a securities depository for banks and brokerage firms. We estimate thatAs of February 5, 2014, there arewere approximately 30,02931,397 beneficial owners of our common stock.
We have not declared andor paid any cash dividends in 20112013 or 2012. Our last cash dividend was paid ($0.07 per share) in the first quarter of 2009. We continuously consider ways to return capital to our stockholders, either through our open market repurchase program and/or through the payment of cash dividends.
Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for shares of our common stock for each quarterly period of 20112013 and 2012.
| | | 2011 | High | Low | |
| First quarter | $ | 65.53 |
| $ | 55.73 |
| |
| Second quarter | $ | 75.00 |
| $ | 59.00 |
| |
| Third quarter | $ | 73.15 |
| $ | 36.33 |
| |
| Fourth quarter | $ | 52.48 |
| $ | 34.17 |
| |
| 2012 | | High | Low |
| First quarter | $ | 62.54 |
| $ | 44.22 |
| $ | 62.54 |
| $ | 44.22 |
|
| Second quarter | $ | 63.67 |
| $ | 47.59 |
| $ | 63.67 |
| $ | 47.59 |
|
| Third quarter | $ | 62.32 |
| $ | 46.73 |
| $ | 62.32 |
| $ | 46.73 |
|
| Fourth quarter | $ | 65.60 |
| $ | 55.54 |
| $ | 65.60 |
| $ | 55.54 |
|
| 2013 | | |
| First quarter | | $ | 72.98 |
| $ | 62.30 |
|
| Second quarter | | $ | 78.62 |
| $ | 64.01 |
|
| Third quarter | | $ | 86.76 |
| $ | 73.95 |
|
| Fourth quarter | | $ | 93.80 |
| $ | 80.81 |
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Board of Directors has approved an open market stock repurchase program. On May 26, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the purchase of shares in an amount not to exceed $400.0 million, which expiresexpired on May 31, 2013.
Additionally on On October 26, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into an additional share repurchase program. This board authorization allowsprogram for the repurchase of a further $400.0 million of common shares. An additional repurchase program for $200.0 million of common shares at the discretionwas authorized on October 29, 2013. Both of management for a period untilthese authorizations expire on December 31, 2014. This brings theThe total unexpended balance tounder these three repurchase programs was $420.6379.7 million as of December 31, 2012.2013.
A summary of the repurchase activity for 20122013 follows.
| | | Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchases as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Dollar Value of shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (a) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) | Average price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (a) | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (a) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total through December 31, 2011 | | 3,520,469 |
| $ | 51.27 |
| 3,520,469 |
| $ | 219,505,568 |
| |
| Total through December 31, 2012 | | | 7,051,349 |
| $ | 53.82 |
| 7,051,349 |
| $ | 420,555,846 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| January 1 - January 31 | | 279,409 |
| $ | 48.94 |
| 279,409 |
| $ | 205,885,134 |
| | 10,000 |
| $ | 62.54 |
| 10,000 |
| $ | 419,930,456 |
|
| February 1 - February 28 | | 273,085 |
| $ | 59.83 |
| 273,085 |
| $ | 189,546,551 |
| | 226,603 |
| $ | 67.93 |
| 226,603 |
| $ | 404,537,006 |
|
| March 1 - March 31 | | 321,134 |
| $ | 59.44 |
| 321,134 |
| $ | 170,459,563 |
| | 509,144 |
| $ | 70.56 |
| 509,144 |
| $ | 368,613,986 |
|
| Total first quarter | | 873,628 |
| $ | 56.20 |
| 873,628 |
| | | 745,747 |
| $ | 69.65 |
| 745,747 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 1 - April 30 | | 292,900 |
| $ | 58.26 |
| 292,900 |
| $ | 153,393,800 |
| | 469,018 |
| $ | 66.59 |
| 469,018 |
| $ | 337,380,432 |
|
| May 1 - May 31 | | 230,185 |
| $ | 55.13 |
| 230,185 |
| $ | 140,703,763 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| $ | 337,380,432 |
|
| June 1 - June 30 | | 440,042 |
| $ | 50.47 |
| 440,042 |
| $ | 118,496,196 |
| | 253,100 |
| $ | 74.32 |
| 253,100 |
| $ | 318,570,675 |
|
| Total second quarter | | 963,127 |
| $ | 53.95 |
| 963,127 |
| | | 722,118 |
| $ | 69.30 |
| 722,118 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 1 - July 31 | | 291,793 |
| $ | 50.62 |
| 291,793 |
| $ | 103,372,743 |
| | 111,500 |
| $ | 79.05 |
| 111,500 |
| $ | 309,757,101 |
|
| August 1 - August 31 | | 181,320 |
| $ | 57.25 |
| 181,320 |
| $ | 93,393,106 |
| | 231,084 |
| $ | 78.61 |
| 231,084 |
| $ | 291,591,256 |
|
| September 1 - September 30 | | 391,912 |
| $ | 58.60 |
| 391,912 |
| $ | 70,426,540 |
| | 275,769 |
| $ | 84.40 |
| 275,769 |
| $ | 268,316,629 |
|
| Total third quarter | | 865,025 |
| $ | 55.57 |
| 865,025 |
| | | 618,353 |
| $ | 81.27 |
| 618,353 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| October 1 - October 31 | | 190,763 |
| $ | 57.20 |
| 190,763 |
| $ | 459,514,995 |
| | 119,000 |
| $ | 84.86 |
| 119,000 |
| $ | 458,218,171 |
|
| November 1 - November 30 | | 224,337 |
| $ | 60.00 |
| 224,337 |
| $ | 446,054,687 |
| | 631,996 |
| $ | 86.28 |
| 631,996 |
| $ | 403,703,675 |
|
| December 1 - December 31 | | 414,000 |
| $ | 61.59 |
| 414,000 |
| $ | 420,555,846 |
| | 266,780 |
| $ | 89.89 |
| 266,780 |
| $ | 379,722,420 |
|
| Total fourth quarter | | 829,100 |
| $ | 60.15 |
| 829,100 |
| | | 1,017,776 |
| $ | 87.05 |
| 1,017,776 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total through December 31, 2012 | | 7,051,349 |
| $ | 53.82 |
| 7,051,349 |
| $ | 420,555,846 |
| |
| Total through December 31, 2013 | | | 10,155,343 |
| $ | 61.08 |
| 10,155,343 |
| $ | 379,722,420 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Relates to the share repurchase programs approved in May 2011, October 2012 and October 2013 as previously discussed.
All share repurchases were effected in accordance with the safe harbor provisions of Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph and table compare the cumulative total shareholder's return on our common stock from December 31, 20072008 through December 31, 2012,2013, with the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the Standard & Poor's Auto Parts & Equipment Index. The table and graph use data supplied by the S&P Capital IQ.
The comparisons reflected in the graph and table are not intended to forecast the future performance of the common stock and may not be indicative of such future performance.
Total Shareholder Returns
| | | | 12/31/2007 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 |
| WABCO Holdings, Inc. | 100 | 31.82 |
| 52.26 |
| 123.48 |
| 87.95 |
| 132.11 |
| 100 | 164.26 | 388.07 | 276.42 | 415.20 | 594.94 |
| S&P 500 Index | 100 | 63.00 |
| 79.67 |
| 91.68 |
| 93.61 |
| 108.59 |
| 100 | 126.46 | 145.51 | 148.59 | 172.37 | 228.19 |
| S&P 500 Auto Parts & Equipment Index | 100 | 51.34 |
| 79.41 |
| 113.38 |
| 93.27 |
| 97.42 |
| 100 | 154.68 | 220.85 | 181.68 | 189.76 | 312.65 |
| |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
| | | (Amounts in millions, except share and per share data) | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
| Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | $ | 2,175.7 |
| | $ | 1,491.5 |
| | $ | 2,588.0 |
| | $ | 2,720.5 |
| | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | $ | 2,175.7 |
| | $ | 1,491.5 |
|
| Cost of sales | | 1,732.0 |
| | 1,984.6 |
| | 1,556.6 |
| | 1,126.7 |
| | 1,883.5 |
| | 1,906.2 |
| | 1,732.0 |
| | 1,984.6 |
| | 1,556.6 |
| | 1,126.7 |
|
| Streamlining expenses (a) | | 5.2 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 4.0 |
| | 37.0 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 4.0 |
| | 37.0 |
|
| Gross profit | | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
| | 615.1 |
| | 327.8 |
| | 694.0 |
| | 809.1 |
| | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
| | 615.1 |
| | 327.8 |
|
| Costs and expenses: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Selling and administrative expenses | | 300.5 |
| | 326.6 |
| | 307.4 |
| | 251.9 |
| | 316.8 |
| | 345.1 |
| | 300.5 |
| | 326.6 |
| | 307.4 |
| | 251.9 |
|
| Product engineering expenses | | 104.3 |
| | 105.1 |
| | 85.9 |
| | 75.2 |
| | 92.9 |
| | 119.4 |
| | 104.3 |
| | 105.1 |
| | 85.9 |
| | 75.2 |
|
| Streamlining (income) / expenses (a) | | 7.7 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 19.8 |
| | 26.4 |
| |
| Streamlining expenses (a) | | | 7.7 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 19.8 |
|
| Other operating expense / (income), net | | 3.2 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 5.0 |
| | (4.2 | ) | | 11.4 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 5.0 |
| | (4.2 | ) |
| Operating income / (loss) | | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
| | 217.6 |
| | (14.9 | ) | | 246.5 |
| | 331.9 |
| | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
| | 217.6 |
| | (14.9 | ) |
| European Commission fine indemnification | | — |
| | — |
| | (400.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
| European Commission fine reimbursement/(indemnification) | | | 279.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (400.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Equity income of unconsolidated joint ventures | | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 8.1 |
| | 17.7 |
| | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 3.1 |
|
| Other non-operating (expense), net | | (5.0 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | (4.3 | ) | |
| Income from indemnification and other settlements | | — |
| | 23.1 |
| | — |
| | 41.3 |
| | — |
| |
| Fair value adjustment (charge) of the noncontrolling interest prior to taking control | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.5 | ) | | — |
| |
| Interest (expense) / income, net | | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | 0.5 |
| | 3.7 |
| |
| (Loss) / income before income taxes | | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
| | (177.3 | ) | | 13.2 |
| | 254.0 |
| |
| Income tax expense / (benefit) (b) | | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
| | 36.9 |
| | (10.7 | ) | | 38.2 |
| |
| Net (loss) / income including noncontrolling interests | | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
| | (214.2 | ) | | 23.9 |
| | 215.8 |
| |
| Other non-operating income/(expense), net | | | 6.9 |
| | (5.0 | ) | | 20.2 |
| | (2.2 | ) | | 36.0 |
|
| Fair value adjustment (charge) of noncontrolling interest prior to taking control | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.5 | ) |
| Interest income/(expense), net | | | 4.9 |
| | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | 0.5 |
|
| Income/(loss) before income taxes | | | 640.9 |
| | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
| | (177.3 | ) | | 13.2 |
|
| Income tax (benefit)/expense (b) | | | (21.0 | ) | | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
| | 36.9 |
| | (10.7 | ) |
| Net income/(loss) including noncontrolling interests | | | 661.9 |
| | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
| | (214.2 | ) | | 23.9 |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| Net (loss) / income | | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
| | $ | (226.1 | ) | | $ | 18.8 |
| | $ | 213.3 |
| |
| Net income/(loss) | | | $ | 653.2 |
| | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
| | $ | (226.1 | ) | | $ | 18.8 |
|
| Per share: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | | $ | 4.73 |
| | $ | 5.35 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | | $ | 0.29 |
| | 3.28 |
| | $ | 10.46 |
| | $ | 4.73 |
| | $ | 5.35 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | | $ | 0.29 |
|
| Diluted | | $ | 4.62 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | | $ | 0.29 |
| | 3.24 |
| | $ | 10.31 |
| | $ | 4.62 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | | $ | 0.29 |
|
| Average number of outstanding common shares: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | | 63,906,992 |
| | 66,693,064 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| | 64,024,237 |
| | 65,113,404 |
| | 62,474,493 |
| | 63,906,992 |
| | 66,693,064 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| | 64,024,237 |
|
| Diluted | | 65,323,389 |
| | 68,829,440 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| | 65,030,557 |
| | 65,871,941 |
| | 63,382,564 |
| | 65,323,389 |
| | 68,829,440 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| | 65,030,557 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 1,747.0 |
| | $ | 1,623.2 |
| | $ | 1,524.9 |
| | $ | 1,715.6 |
| | $ | 1,776.0 |
| | $ | 2,392.8 |
| | $ | 1,747.0 |
| | $ | 1,623.2 |
| | $ | 1,524.9 |
| | $ | 1,715.6 |
|
| Total debt | | $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | 78.2 |
| | $ | 113.5 |
| | $ | 156.1 |
| | $ | 250.0 |
| | $ | 87.1 |
| | $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | 78.8 |
| | $ | 113.5 |
| | $ | 156.1 |
|
| Total Shareholders' equity | | $ | 676.4 |
| | $ | 587.2 |
| | $ | 412.3 |
| | $ | 640.1 |
| | $ | 601.5 |
| | $ | 1,152.8 |
| | $ | 676.4 |
| | $ | 587.2 |
| | $ | 412.3 |
| | $ | 640.1 |
|
| Cash dividends per common share | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | 0.28 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.07 |
|
(a) Due to the materiality of the streamlining expenses related to cost of sales during 2009, the amounts have been shown separately and comparable periods have been adjusted.
(b) The income tax benefit for 2013 includes taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and a tax provision on unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. This assertion is resulting from the Company recognizing earnings in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine as further discussed in Note 15 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company recorded a tax
benefit of $178.4 million for a release at the end of the year of a valuation allowance related to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize $10.1 million of its deferred tax assets in other foreign jurisdictions and has recorded a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets.
The income tax provision for 2012 includesincluded taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and certain foreign tax planning. Additionally, the income tax provision is offset by the release of tax accruals for uncertain tax positions due to certain government filings submitted in January 2012 of approximately $24.8 million, as adjusted from an amount of $18.8 million as previously disclosed
in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K.million. Additionally, a tax benefit of $4.1 million related to the Company's filing of its 2011 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return in September, 2012 was recorded during the third quarter.quarter of 2012.
The income tax provision for 2011 includesincluded taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions offset by benefits related to ongoing foreign tax planning activities, a decrease in a valuation allowance, and the release of certain tax accruals as a consequence of the settlement of foreign tax audits and the expiration of a statute of limitation. Additionally, the Company provided a tax provision of $12.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2011 due to the Company's decision to repatriate earnings from a foreign affiliate of approximately $299 million.
The income tax provision for 2010 includesincluded taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions and benefits related to ongoing foreign tax planning activities. In addition, the tax provision for 2010 excludesexcluded any benefit related to the indemnification payment of approximately $400 million for a European Commission fine as previously disclosed in the EC fine.Company's 2010 Form 10-K. During the third quarter of 2010, an uncertain tax position of approximately $135.8 million was recorded for the tax deduction related to the EC fine. The entity that will claim a deduction for $396.9 million of the EC fine has existing net operating losses resulting in a deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction for which a full valuation allowance has been provided. Consequently, as this tax deduction would otherwise increase the deferred tax asset related to the net operating losses for which a full valuation allowance is provided, the uncertain tax position of $134.9 million is recorded as a reduction of the related deferred tax asset on the balance sheet.
The income tax benefit for 2009 includesincluded a net benefit of $13.0 million, principally related to the release of tax accruals as a consequence of the settlement of a foreign tax audit.
The income tax provision for 2008 includes a net benefit of $8.3 million, principally related to a reduction of an unrecognized tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2007 related to the separation of the WABCO business from Trane. This change in estimate resulted from the filing of the Company's and Trane's 2007 U.S. Federal income tax returns in September 2008. The 2008 effective income tax rate was 15.2%.
For a comparative analysis of certain line items in the Income Statement Data section of this table, see Item 7. “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” which follows.
| |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the results of operations and financial condition of WABCO during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere herein. Certain information in this discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding the future performance of our business and other non-historical statements are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” above. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements,” “Selected Financial Information,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
Executive Overview
In 2012, the2013, global production of new trucks and buses greater than six tons declinedincreased in most markets, with exception of Japan and US, and wewhile India experienced a significant decline year over year. We estimate that commercial vehicle production declined 10%new truck and bus builds increased by 3% globally. WABCO's sales during full year 2012 decreased2013 increased by 11.3% (4.8%9.8% (9.3% excluding foreign currency translation effects) compared with the same period a year ago. Overall, WABCO continued in 20122013 to outperform in the aggregate the global production of commercial vehicles.trucks and buses.
In 2012,2013, WABCO's global aftermarket sales decreasedincreased by 2% (an increase of 5%7.4% (7.1% excluding foreign currency translation effects), compared with the same period a year ago, resulting in record aftermarket revenues on a currency adjusted basis. This performance demonstrates the continued success of the Company's aftermarket strategies initiated several years ago.
In 2013, WABCO China was recertified as a high technology enterprise by the third quartergovernment authorities. In 2010, WABCO became one of 2012,the first global suppliers in the automotive and commercial vehicle industry to obtain such certification in China, and WABCO inauguratedremains one of the few in its secondfield with this official status. It also reaffirms WABCO’s well-anchored local capabilities and resources in China, the world’s largest market for production of trucks and buses.
In 2013, WABCO India opened a new factory in Lucknow in the proximity of a major production site for TATA Trucks. WABCO India now has five world-class manufacturing facility atsites located in Ambattur, Chennai; Jamshedpur; Mahindra World CityCity; Pantnagar and Lucknow. WABCO India is also a major hub in Chennai, India. WABCO INDIA's newest plant will supplyWABCO’s global manufacturing and sourcing network. It supplies customers based in Germany,India, Japan, PolandEurope, and the United States, among other markets internationally. WABCO INDIA owns and operates four world-class manufacturing sites located in India.
Also in the third quarter of 2012, WABCO opened its new sales and training center in Hanover, Germany, further extending the aftermarket capabilities of WABCO University to serve customers within the commercial vehicle industry. The new center is WABCO's largest of 14 training centers worldwide. WABCO University serves customers in 45 countries.
Throughout 20122013 and despite declinesvariations in market demand,volumes of new truck and bus production across markets, WABCO continued to deliver strong profitability, achieving an operating profit margin at 13.1% of sales.profitability. Also during 2012,2013, WABCO's Operating System continued to provide fast and flexible responses to major market changes, delivering $66.6$84.2 million of materials and conversion productivity. Gross materials productivity in 20122013 represented 5.3% of total materials cost but, as expected, the impact of commodity inflation reduced net materials productivity to 4.4%5.0%. Conversion productivity in 20122013 represented 6.2%6.3%, another robust result.a new annual record for WABCO.
Our Markets and Our Customers
Our sales are affected by changes in truck and bus (T&B) production. Europe is our largest geographic market and sales to T&B OEMs represent our largest customer group. The table below shows the relationship between our sales to European T&B OEMs, which account for approximately 57% of our global sales to T&B OEMs, and European T&B production for the last five years. Sales data is shown at a constant euroEuro to U.S. dollarDollar exchange rate for year to year comparability and to make comparisons to unit production meaningful. Over the past five years, our sales have outperformed the growth in European T&B production by an average of 3%4% per year.
| | | Year to Year Change | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 |
| Sales to European T&B OEMs (at a constant FX rate) | | 4 | % | | (58 | )% | | 60 | % | | 34 | % | | (10 | )% | | (58 | )% | | 60 | % | | 34 | % | | (10 | )% | | 13 | % |
| European T&B Production | | 4 | % | | (62 | )% | | 52 | % | | 31 | % | | (9 | )% | | (62 | )% | | 52 | % | | 31 | % | | (9 | )% | | 5 | % |
In general, our sales track directionally with truck and bus builds. However, individual year to year sales changes are also influenced by other factors such as timing of orders and deliveries to T&B OEM customers, application content, new
product introduction, price and introduction of new customer platforms. The level of truck build activity is influenced by general economic conditions, including interest rate levels and inflation.
Our aftermarket sales account for approximately 25% of total sales and are affected by a variety of factors: content on specific vehicles and breadth of our product range, number of commercial trucks in active operation, truck age, type of vehicles built, miles driven, demand for transported goods and overall economic activity. On average, our aftermarket sales (on a constant exchange to the U.S. dollarDollar rate) have grown by 6%7% annually for the last five years as shown in the table below.
| | Year to Year Change | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Average Change | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Average Change |
| Aftermarket Sales (at Constant FX rate) | 1 | % | (6 | )% | 22 | % | 8 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | |
| Aftermarket Sales (at constant FX rate) | | (6 | )% | 22 | % | 8 | % | 5 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % |
Distribution of WABCO's Sales by Major End-Markets, Product Types and Geography
| | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Major End-Markets | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| OE Manufacturers: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Truck & Bus products | 62 | % | | 64 | % | | 63 | % | 62 | % | | 62 | % | | 64 | % |
| Trailer products | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | 7 | % | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | 9 | % |
| Car products | 4 | % | | 4 | % | | 4 | % | 4 | % | | 4 | % | | 4 | % |
| Aftermarket | 25 | % | | 23 | % | | 26 | % | 25 | % | | 25 | % | | 23 | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Geography: | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Europe | 60 | % | | 62 | % | | 60 | % | 61 | % | | 60 | % | | 62 | % |
| North America | 11 | % | | 9 | % | | 8 | % | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 9 | % |
| South America | 6 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | 7 | % | | 6 | % | | 7 | % |
| Asia | 20 | % | | 19 | % | | 22 | % | 18 | % | | 20 | % | | 19 | % |
| Other | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 3 | % | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 3 | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Our largest customer is Daimler, which accounts for approximately 11%12% of our sales. Volvo accounted for 10% of our sales in 2012.2013. Other key customers include Ashok Leyland, BMW, China National Heavy Truck Corporation (CNHTC), Cummins, Fiat (Iveco), Hino, Hyundai, Krone, MAN Nutzfahrzeuge AG (MAN), Meritor, Meritor WABCO (a joint venture), Paccar (DAF Trucks N.V. (DAF), Kenworth, Leyland and Peterbilt), First Automobile Works, Otto Sauer Achsenfabrik (SAF), Scania, Schmitz Cargobull AG, TATA Motors and ZF Friedrichshafen AG (ZF). For the fiscal years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 52% of our sales each year.
Results of Operations
Approximately 88.9%89% of our sales are outside the U.S.United States and therefore, changes in exchange rates can have a significant impact on the reported results of our operations, which are presented in U.S. dollars.Dollars. Year-over-year changes in sales, expenses and net income for 2013 compared with 2012 and 2012 compared with 2011, and 2011 compared with 2010, are presented both with and without the effects of foreign currency translation. Changes in sales, expenses and net income excluding foreign exchange effects are calculated using current year sales, expenses and net income translated at prior year exchange rates. Presenting changes in sales, expenses and net income excluding the effects of foreign currency translation is not in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”)(U.S. GAAP), but we analyze this data because it is useful to us in understanding the operating performance of our business. We believe this data is also useful to shareholders for the same reason. The changes in sales, expenses and net income excluding the effects of foreign exchange translation are not meant to be a substitute for measurements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, nor to be considered in isolation. Management believes that presenting these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures is useful to shareholders because it enhances their understanding of how management assesses the operating performance of the Company's business.
Results of Operations for 20122013 Compared with 20112012
| | | | Year ended December 31, | | | | Excluding Foreign Exchange Translation * | Year ended December 31, | | | | Excluding Foreign Exchange Translation ** |
| (amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | % change reported | | 2012 adjusted amount | | % change adjusted | 2013 | | 2012 | | % change reported | | 2013 adjusted amount | | % change adjusted |
| Sales | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | (11.3 | )% | | $ | 2,659.6 |
| | (4.8 | )% | $ | 2,720.5 |
| | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | 9.8 | % | | $ | 2,708.8 |
| | 9.3 | % |
| Cost of sales | 1,737.2 |
| | 1,986.1 |
| | (12.5 | )% | | 1,862.8 |
| | (6.2 | )% | 1,911.4 |
| | 1,737.2 |
| | 10.0 | % | | 1,910.8 |
| | 10.0 | % |
| Gross profit | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
| | (8.4 | )% | | 796.8 |
| | (1.4 | )% | 809.1 |
| | 740.2 |
| | 9.3 | % | | 798.0 |
| | 7.8 | % |
| Operating expenses | 415.7 |
| | 438.1 |
| | (5.1 | )% | | 444.5 |
| | 1.5 | % | 477.2 |
| | 415.7 |
| | 14.8 | % | | 469.4 |
| | 12.9 | % |
| Operating income | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
| | (12.3 | )% | | 352.3 |
| | (4.8 | )% | 331.9 |
| | 324.5 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 328.6 |
| | 1.3 | % |
| Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 9.7 | % | | 18.3 |
| | 10.9 | % | 17.7 |
| | 18.1 |
| | (2.2 | )% | | 17.7 |
| | (2.2 | )% |
| Other non-operating (expense)/income, net | (5.0 | ) | | 20.2 |
| | (124.8 | )% | | (5.3 | ) | | (126.2 | )% | |
| Interest (expense), net | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (11.8 | )% | | (1.5 | ) | | (11.8 | )% | |
| Other non-operating income/(expense), net | | 286.4 |
| | (5.0 | ) | | * | | 272.5 |
| | * |
| Interest income/(expense), net | | 4.9 |
| | (1.5 | ) | | * | | 4.7 |
| | * |
| Income before income taxes | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
| | (17.0 | )% | | 363.8 |
| | (10.2 | )% | 640.9 |
| | 336.1 |
| | 90.7 | % | | 623.5 |
| | 85.5 | % |
| Income tax expense | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
| | (35.7 | )% | | 27.0 |
| | (26.4 | )% | |
| Income tax (benefit)/expense | | (21.0 | ) | | 23.6 |
| | (189.0 | )% | | (13.0 | ) | | (155.1 | )% |
| Net income including noncontrolling interests | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
| | (15.1 | )% | | 336.8 |
| | (8.5 | )% | 661.9 |
| | 312.5 |
| | 111.8 | % | | 636.5 |
| | 103.7 | % |
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
| | (6.3 | )% | | 11.5 |
| | 2.7 | % | 8.7 |
| | 10.5 |
| | (17.1 | )% | | 9.0 |
| | (14.3 | )% |
| Net income attributable to Company | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
| | (15.4 | )% | | $ | 325.3 |
| | (8.9 | )% | $ | 653.2 |
| | $ | 302.0 |
| | 116.3 | % | | $ | 627.5 |
| | 107.8 | % |
* Percentage change not considered meaningful
** Amounts translated using 20112012 average exchange rates for comparability
Sales
Our sales for 20122013 were $2,477.42,720.5 million, a decreasean increase of 11.3%9.8% (4.8%9.3% excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $2,794.12,477.4 million in 2011.2012. The increase, excluding foreign currency translation effects, was predominately driven by increased WABCO content per vehicle and a 3% improvement in the global production of new trucks and buses greater than six tons. Total sales in Europe, our largest market, increased approximately 11.3% (8.0% excluding foreign currency translation effects) for the full year 2013, driven mainly by increased WABCO content per vehicle and higher levels of truck, bus and trailer production. Total sales increased 7.8% in North America due to increased WABCO content per vehicle despite reduced commercial vehicle production. Total sales in Asia decreased 1.6% (increased 4.6% excluding foreign currency translation effects). The sales drop in Asia was driven primarily by reductions in total sales in India of 27.8% (21.4% excluding foreign currency translation effects) and in Japan of 13.4% (increase of 5.6% excluding foreign currency translation effects), where the markets experienced significant declines. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in sales in China of 26.5% (23.2% excluding foreign currency translation effects) and South Korea of 6.3% (3.1% excluding foreign currency translation effects). Total sales in South America increased 30.4% (43.2% excluding foreign currency translation effects) driven by increased WABCO content per vehicle in addition to the recovery in production of new trucks and buses in Brazil. The global aftermarket sales performance, included in the geographic numbers provided above, was an increase of 7.4% (7.1% excluding foreign currency translation effects), as we continued to benefit from the Company's aftermarket strategies initiated several years ago.
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
Our cost of sales for the year 2013 was $1,911.4 million, an increase of $174.2 million ($173.6 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $1,737.2 million in 2012. Within cost of sales, our largest expense is material costs, which mainly represents the purchase of components and parts. Our continued focus on productivity generated 5.3% of material savings before the impact of commodity inflation, which had a negative impact of 0.3%, bringing net materials productivity to 5.0% for the year. This productivity achievement resulted in $58.5 million of material cost savings. Our second largest expense within the cost of sales is for labor and other costs associated with converting our purchased components and parts into finished goods. Labor and other cost escalations increased conversion costs by approximately $14.7 million, while our productivity efforts generated $25.7 million of savings, or 6.3% of the conversion costs. Better claims experience decreased warranty expenses by $9.1 million compared to last year. Streamlining expenses increased costs by $1.6 million. Absorption of overhead costs and other indirect costs were favorable by $45.0 million versus the prior year. Volume and mix increased cost of sales by $251.6 million, and together with the increase in sales contributed $10.9 million to an increase in gross profit. Sales price reductions had a negative impact of $34.2 million on gross profit, or 1.2% of sales. Foreign currency translational effects increased cost of sales by $0.6 million and combined with the translational effects on sales they positively impacted
gross profit in the amount of $11.1 million. Foreign currency transactional impacts increased cost of sales by $44.0 million and negatively affected gross profit in the amount of $40.9 million. The net result of all these changes was an increase in gross profit of $68.9 million (or $57.8 million excluding foreign currency translation effects).
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, which include selling and administrative expenses, product engineering expenses and other operating expenses, increased by $61.5 million ($53.7 million excluding foreign currency translation effects). The increase, excluding foreign currency translation effects, comprised increases in labor and other cost inflation of $11.2 million, incentive compensation of $13.6 million, research and development investments of $13.0 million, pension costs of $4.3 million due to a 2012 reduction in our UK pension obligation and streamlining and separation costs of $6.0 million. In addition, we also saw an increase in investments in global expansion of $5.6 million.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $0.4 million to $17.7 million in 2013 as compared to $18.1 million in 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by lower income from our South African joint venture, which decreased by $0.9 million.
Other Non-Operating Income, net
In 2013 we received a reimbursement of $279.5 million on a fine previously assessed in 2010 by the European Commission (EC) as further discussed in Note 14 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding this gain in 2013, non-operating income amounted to $6.9 million versus an expense of $5.0 million for 2012, primarily a result of the release of an accrual for tax indemnification liabilities due to the settlement of a foreign tax audit.
Interest Expense, net
Net interest income increased by $6.4 million to $4.9 million in 2013 compared to an expense of $1.5 million in 2012. This was mainly a result of interest income received on the EC fine reimbursement amounting to €4.0 million or approximately $5.4 million.
Income Taxes
The income tax benefit for 2013 was $21.0 million on $640.9 million of pre-tax income before adjusting for noncontrolling interest, compared with an income tax provision of $23.6 million on pre-tax income of $336.1 million before adjusting for noncontrolling interest in 2012. The income tax benefit for 2013 includes taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and a tax provision on unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. This assertion is resulting from the Company recognizing earnings in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine as further discussed in Note 15 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $178.4 million for a release at the end of the year of a valuation allowance related to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. In particular, evidence such as our historical operating profits resulting in a cumulative profitable position during the three-year period ending on December 31, 2013, the receipt of an exceptional EC fine refund in the fourth quarter of 2013 and projected operating profits represented sufficient positive evidence to release a full valuation allowance at the end of 2013 on the deferred tax asset under ASC 740.
This release was recorded as an income tax benefit as of December 31, 2013 which significantly reduced the effective tax rate, resulting in a negative effective tax rate. We expect our effective tax rate to increase in subsequent periods following this release of the valuation allowance. Our net income and effective tax rate will be negatively affected in periods following this release. However, the valuation allowance release will not affect the amount of cash paid for income taxes. Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize $10.1 million of its deferred tax assets in other foreign jurisdictions since evidence such as historical operating profits resulted in a cumulative loss position during the most recent three-year period ending on December 31, 2013 and lack of projected earnings provided sufficient negative evidence to record a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets.
Furthermore, in the first quarter of 2013, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.4 million due to the impact of U.S. tax legislation enacted in January 2013 and a tax benefit of $2.4 million related to the Company's filing of its 2012 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return in September 2013 that was recorded during the third quarter.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $1.8 million ($1.5 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) to $8.7 million in 2013, primarily the result of a decrease in earnings from WABCO India.
Backlog
Backlog, which represents valid sales orders that have not yet been filled as of the end of the reporting period, was $1.3 billion at the end of 2013, an increase of 19.6% (18.1% excluding foreign currency translation effects) from the end of 2012. Backlog is not necessarily predictive of future business as it relates only to some of our products, and customers may still change future delivery dates.
Results of Operations for 2012 Compared with 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | | | Excluding Foreign Exchange Translation ** |
| (amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | % change reported | | 2012 adjusted amount | | % change adjusted |
| Sales | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | (11.3 | )% | | $ | 2,659.6 |
| | (4.8 | )% |
| Cost of sales | 1,737.2 |
| | 1,986.1 |
| | (12.5 | )% | | 1,862.8 |
| | (6.2 | )% |
| Gross profit | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
| | (8.4 | )% | | 796.8 |
| | (1.4 | )% |
| Operating expenses | 415.7 |
| | 438.1 |
| | (5.1 | )% | | 444.5 |
| | 1.5 | % |
| Operating income | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
| | (12.3 | )% | | 352.3 |
| | (4.8 | )% |
| Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 9.7 | % | | 18.3 |
| | 10.9 | % |
| Other non-operating (expense)/income, net | (5.0 | ) | | 20.2 |
| | (124.8 | )% | | (5.3 | ) | | (126.2 | )% |
| Interest expense, net | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (11.8 | )% | | (1.5 | ) | | (11.8 | )% |
| Income before income taxes | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
| | (17.0 | )% | | 363.8 |
|
| (10.2 | )% |
| Income tax expense | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
| | (35.7 | )% | | 27.0 |
| | (26.4 | )% |
| Net income including noncontrolling interests | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
| | (15.1 | )% | | 336.8 |
| | (8.5 | )% |
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
| | (6.3 | )% | | 11.5 |
| | 2.7 | % |
| Net income attributable to Company | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
| | (15.4 | )% | | $ | 325.3 |
| | (8.9 | )% |
** Amounts translated using 2011 average exchange rates for comparability
Sales
Our sales for 2012 were $2,477.4 million, a decrease of 11.3% (4.8% excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $2,794.1 million in 2011. The decrease, excluding foreign currency translation effects, was predominately driven by a 10.2% decline in the global production of new trucks and buses greater than six tons. Total sales in Europe, our largest market, decreased approximately 13.9% (7.0% excluding foreign currency translation effects) for the full year 2012, driven mainly by lower levels of truck, bus and trailer production. Total sales increased 11.7% in North America, which benefited from increased commercial vehicle production. Total sales in Asia decreased 8.1% (4.4% excluding foreign currency translation effects). The sales drop in Asia included reduction in total sales in: India of 19.1% (7.8% excluding foreign currency translation effects), South Korea of 17.1% (14.7% excluding foreign currency translation effects), China of 6% (8.5% excluding foreign currency translation effects) and an increase in total sales in Japan of 11% (11.8% excluding foreign currency translation effects). Total sales in South America decreased 28.1% (15.9% excluding foreign currency translation effects) driven by the anticipated decline in production of new trucks and buses in Brazil resulting from higher levels of production in 2011 ahead of the emission mandate as well as the termination of the government sponsored incentive program at the end of 2011. Based on our analysis, we estimate that WABCO's sales growth for 2012 continued to outperform the aggregate global market. The global aftermarket sales decrease, included in the geographic numbers provided above, was 2.5% (increase of 5.2% excluding foreign currency translation effects). This performance, excluding foreign currency translation effects, demonstrates the continued success of the Company's aftermarket strategies initiated several years ago.
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
Our cost of sales for the year 2012 was $1,737.2$1,737.2 million,, a decrease of $248.9$248.9 million ($123.3 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $$1,986.1 million in 1,986.1 million2011 in 2011.. Within cost of sales, our largest expense is material costs, which mainly represents the purchase of components and parts. Our continued focus on productivity generated 5.3% of material savings before the impact of commodity inflation, which had a negative impact of 0.9%, bringing net materials productivity to 4.4% for the year. This productivity achievement resulted in $43.0 million of material cost savings. Our second largest expense within the cost of sales is for labor and other costs associated with converting our purchased components and parts into finished goods. Labor and other cost escalations increased conversion costs by approximately $16.8 million, while our productivity efforts generated $23.6 million of savings, or 6.1% of the conversion costs. Better claims experience decreased warranty expenses by $10.4 million compared to last year. Absorption of overhead costs and other indirect costs were unfavorable by $37.3 million versus the prior year. Volume and mix decreased cost of sales by $78.6 million, and together with the decrease in sales contributed $31.9 million to decrease of gross profit. Sales price reductions had a negative impact of $16.9 million on gross profit, or 0.6% of sales. Foreign currency translational effects decreased cost of sales by $125.7 million, but combined with translational effects on sales they negatively affected gross profit in the amount of $56.6 million. Foreign currency transactional impacts decreased cost of sales by $21.8 million and positively affected gross profit in the
amount of $14.7 million. The net result of all these changes was a decrease in gross profit of $67.8$67.8 million (or $ ($11.2 million excluding foreign currency translation effects).
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, which include selling and administrative expenses, product engineering expenses and other operating expenses, decreased by $22.4$22.4 million (increased by $6.4$6.4 million excluding foreign currency translation effects). The increase excluding foreign currency translation effects comprises increases in labor and other cost inflation of $10.5 million, research and development investments of $7.8 million and streamlining and separation expenses of $9.2 million. These increases are partially offset by reduction in incentive compensation of $16.1 million, reduction in our UK pension obligation of $4.3 million and other net savings of $0.7 million.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $1.6$1.6 million to $18.1 million in 2012 as compared to $16.5 million in $16.5 million2011 in 2011.. The increase was primarily driven by income from the Meritor WABCO joint venture, which increased by $1.7 million.
Other Non-Operating Expense, net
2011 non-operatingNon-operating income amounted to $20.2 million$20.2 millionin2011. This amount was primarily made up of the reversal of approximately $23.1 million of indemnification liabilities due to the closing of a tax audit and other settlements. Absent this income our other non-operating result, net was an expense $5.0of $5.0 million in 2012. The primary component of the 2012 expense was driven by the accrual of a tax indemnification liability of $3.4 million.
Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense decreased by $0.2$0.2 million to $1.5$1.5 million of expense in 2012 compared to $1.7$1.7 million of expense in 2011.2011.
Income Taxes
The income tax provision for 2012 was $23.6$23.6 million on $336.1$336.1 million of pre-tax income before adjusting for noncontrolling interest, compared with $36.7$36.7 million on a pre-tax income of $404.9$404.9 million before adjusting for noncontrolling interest in 2011.2011. The tax provision for 2012 includes taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and certain foreign tax planning. Additionally, the income tax provision is offset by the release of tax accruals for uncertain tax positions due to certain government filings submitted in January 2012 of approximately $24.8 million, as adjusted from an amount of $18.8 million as previously disclosed in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K. Furthermore, a tax benefit of $4.1 million related to the Company's filing of its 2011 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return in September 2012 was recorded during the third quarter.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $0.7$0.7 million (increased by $0.3$0.3 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) to $10.5$1.8 million in 2012. The decline is primarily the result of a decrease in earnings from WABCO INDIA,India, partially offset by improved results of WABCO Compressor Manufacturing.
Backlog
Backlog, which represents valid sales orders that have not yet been filled as of the end of the reporting period, was $1.1 billion at the end of 2012, down 2.9 %2.9% (0.5% excluding foreign currency translation effects) from the end of 2011.2011. Backlog is not necessarily predictive of future business as it relates only to some of our products, and customers may still change future delivery dates.
Results of Operations for 2011 Compared with 2010
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | | | Excluding Foreign Exchange Translation ** |
| (amounts in millions) | 2011 | | 2010 | | % change reported | | 2011 adjusted amount | | % change adjusted |
| Sales | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | $ | 2,175.7 |
| | 28.4 | % | | $ | 2,661.3 |
| | 22.3 | % |
| Cost of sales | 1,986.1 |
| | 1,560.6 |
| | 27.3 | % | | 1,888.0 |
| | 21.0 | % |
| Gross profit | 808.0 |
| | 615.1 |
| | 31.4 | % | | 773.3 |
| | 25.7 | % |
| Operating expenses | 438.1 |
| | 397.5 |
| | 10.2 | % | | 419.3 |
| | 5.5 | % |
| Operating income | 369.9 |
| | 217.6 |
| | 70.0 | % | | 354 |
| | 62.7 | % |
| Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 16.5 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 66.7 | % | | 16.4 |
| | 65.7 | % |
| Other non-operating income/(expense), net | 20.2 |
| | (402.6 | ) | | * |
| | 27.8 |
| | * |
|
| Interest (expense), net | (1.7 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (22.7 | )% | | (1.7 | ) | | (22.7 | )% |
| Income/(loss) before income taxes | 404.9 |
| | (177.3 | ) | | * |
| | 396.5 |
|
| * |
|
| Income tax expense | 36.7 |
| | 36.9 |
| | (0.5 | )% | | 35.9 |
| | (2.7 | )% |
| Net income/(loss) including noncontrolling interests | 368.2 |
| | (214.2 | ) | | * |
| | 360.6 |
| | * |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 11.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| | (5.9 | )% | | 11.5 |
| | (3.4 | )% |
| Net income/(loss) attributable to Company | $ | 357.0 |
| | $ | (226.1 | ) | | * |
| | $ | 349.1 |
| | * |
|
* Percentage change not considered meaningful
** Amounts translated using 2010 average exchange rates for comparability
Sales
Our sales for 2011 were $2,794.1 million, an increase of 28.4% (22.3% excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $2,175.7 million in 2010. The increase was attributable to the higher levels of commercial vehicle production that was evident in most regions across the world, expansion of our aftermarket and car businesses, as well as increased WABCO content per vehicle on trucks, buses and trailers globally. Total sales in Europe, our largest market, increased approximately 31.8% (24.5% excluding foreign currency translation effects) for the full year 2011. Total sales increased 42.5% in North America. Total sales in Asia increased 13.2% (9.4% excluding foreign currency translation effects). The sales growth in Asia included an increase in total sales in India of 14.7% (16.8% excluding foreign currency translation effects) and an increase in total sales in China of 1.5% (a decrease of 2.8% excluding foreign currency translation effects), which was impacted by the anticipated decline in production of new trucks and buses in China. Total sales in South America increased 27.7% (20.9% excluding foreign currency translation effects). Based on our analysis, we estimate that WABCO's sales growth for 2011 outperformed the aggregate global market. The global aftermarket sales increase, included in the geographic numbers provided above, was 13.2% (8.0% excluding foreign currency translation effects), resulting in record aftermarket revenues.
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
Our cost of sales for the year 2011 was $1,986.1 million, an increase of $425.5 million ($327.4 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) from $1,560.6 million in 2010. Within cost of sales, our largest expense is material costs, which mainly represents the purchase of components and parts. Our continued focus on productivity generated 5.3% of material savings before the impact of commodity inflation, which had a negative impact of 2.0%, bringing net materials productivity to 3.3% for the year. This productivity achievement resulted in $37.7 million of material cost savings. Our second largest expense within the cost of sales is for labor and other costs associated with converting our purchased components and parts into finished goods. Labor and other cost escalations increased conversion costs by approximately $18.6 million, while our productivity efforts generated $25.5 million of savings, or 5.9% of the conversion costs. Warranty expenses were higher compared to last year by $7.9 million, driven mostly by increased volume. Absorption of overhead costs and other indirect costs were favorable by $45.9 million versus the prior year. Volume and mix increased cost of sales by $398.0 million, and contributed $109.4 million to increase of gross profit. Sales price reductions had a negative impact of $26.6 million on gross profit, or 1.0% of sales. Foreign currency translational effects increased cost of sales by $98.2 million and combined with translational effects on sales they positively affected gross profit in the amount of $34.8 million. Foreign currency transactional impacts increased cost of sales by $11.9 million and negatively affected gross profit in the amount of $7.3 million. The net result of all these changes was an increase in gross profit of $192.9 million (or $158.2 excluding foreign currency translation effects).
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, which include selling and administrative expenses, product engineering expenses and other operating expenses, increased by $40.6 million ($21.8 million excluding foreign currency translation effects). The increase was mainly driven by new research and development investments of $14.9 million, investments in global expansion of $5.8 million, labor and other cost inflation of $7.0 million, partially offset by separation and other costs of $5.9 million.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $6.6 million to $16.5 million in 2011 as compared to $9.9 million in 2010. The increase was primarily driven by income from the Meritor WABCO joint venture, which increased by $5.8 million. This increase is due to the fact that Meritor WABCO was able to benefit from more favorable market conditions in North America in 2011.
Other Non-Operating Expense, net
In 2010 we incurred an expense for the EC Fine indemnification in the amount of $400.4 million, driving the majority of the other non-operating expense incurred last year of $402.6 million. Absent this expense in 2011, our other non-operating income, net was $20.2 million. This amount was primarily made up of the reversal of approximately $23.1 million of indemnification liabilities due to the closing of a tax audit and other settlements.
Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense decreased by $0.5 million to $1.7 million of expense in 2011 compared to $2.2 million of expense in 2010. The overall change in net interest expense is the net impact from changing interest rates on our debt and investments, fees and credit margins and changes in outstanding balances associated with our Accounts Receivable Securitization Program and our $400 million revolving credit facility, which we refer to as our "revolving credit facility".
Income Taxes
The income tax provision for 2011 was $36.7 million on $404.9 million of pre-tax income before adjusting for noncontrolling interest, compared with $36.9 million on a pre-tax loss of $177.3 million before adjusting for noncontrolling interest in 2010. The tax charge for 2011 was the net result of taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions and benefits from certain foreign tax planning. Furthermore, income tax expense was partially offset by the release of tax accruals of approximately $19.2 million as a consequence of the settlement of foreign tax audits and the expiration of a statute of limitation. Additionally, the Company provided a tax provision of $12.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2011 due to the Company's decision to repatriate earnings from a foreign affiliate of approximately $299 million.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $0.7 million ($0.4 million excluding foreign currency translation effects) to $11.2 million in 2011. The decrease is the result of the decline in earnings from our majority owned subsidiary in China that provides conventional mechanical products to the local market. This was partially offset by improved results of our WABCO INDIA business as well as our U.S. partnership, WABCO Compressor Manufacturing.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We employ several means to manage our liquidity, and we are not dependent upon any one source of funding. Our sources of financing include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, our revolving credit facility, our Accounts Receivable Securitization Program and the use of operating leases.
We believe the combination of expected cash flows, the revolving credit facility being committed until September 2016,2018, and the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program maturing in September 20152016 (subject to annual renewal) will provide us with adequate liquidity to support the Company's operations.
The Company also has the ability to access a wide range of additional external financing instruments.
Specifically for 20132014 we expect an increase in our consolidatedcapital spending primarily due to the construction of a new plant in Poland. Outside of our capital expenditures, our overall cash flow is expected to be in line with the Company's 20122013 cash flow profile, and there are no known trends or uncertainties that are reasonably expected to have a material effect on the separate sources and uses of cash.
As of December 31, 20122013, $99.2$461.3 million of the $175.0472.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheet was held by foreign subsidiaries, confirming our focus and intent to use our cash outside the U.S.United States. The Company considers the earnings of substantially all of its foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S.United States and as such no additional U.S. tax cost has been provided. The Company has provided for tax at the U.S. tax rate for its Brazilian affiliate's current year earnings in 2012.2013. In addition, a tax provision was also provided on unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. This assertion is resulting from the Company recognizing earnings in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine as further discussed in Note 15 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company estimates the amount of its unremitted foreign earnings permanently reinvested outside the U.S.United States to be approximately $475840 million as of December 31, 2012,2013; however, it is not practicable to estimate the tax liability that would arise if the earnings that are considered permanently reinvested were remitted to the U.S.United States.
Cash Flows for 2013 Compared with 2012
Net cash provided by operating activities was $665.8 million for 2013 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $358.3 million for 2012.
We recorded net income including noncontrolling interests of $661.9 million for 2013 compared with net income including noncontrolling interests of $312.5 million for 2012. Net income for 2013 included $279.5 million related to the EC fine reimbursement, as well as noncash elements such as depreciation and amortization of $85.2 million. Our working capital increased by $27.2 million, primarily driven by higher accounts receivable and to a lesser extent inventory. The decrease of receivables in the fourth quarter, mainly due to significant collections at year-end, was not sufficient to offset the increase in the first three quarters, a result of an increase in business activity. This also resulted in a higher level of payables which only partially offset the above.
The change in other accrued liabilities and taxes was an increase of $38.5 million for 2013 compared to a decrease of $37.9 million for 2012. The major drivers of this change were increases in accruals for payroll and incentive compensation, as well as accruals for uninvoiced goods and services. The change in other current and long-term assets for 2013 was an increase of $28.8 million compared to a decrease of $23.0 million for 2012. The main drivers of this change were increases in tax related items, notes receivables from our Chinese operations and restricted cash related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program. The change in other long-term liabilities for 2013 was a decrease of $9.8 million compared to an increase of $2.1 million for 2012, mainly a result of the payment and release of the remaining accrual for tax indemnification liabilities due to the settlement of a foreign tax audit.
The net cash used in investing activities amounted to $176.7 million in 2013 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $105.6 million in 2012. The net cash usage for 2013 includes capital expenditures of $47.0 million of investments in tooling, $61.1 million on plant and equipment and $13.4 million in computer software, which supported our market growth and new programs during the year. This compared with $43.2 million of investments in tooling, $48.5 million on plant and equipment and $8.8 million in computer software in 2012, as well as $5.1 million for acquisitions. We also purchased $55.2 million of short-term investments in 2013.
The net cash used by financing activities during 2013 amounted to $193.4 million compared to net cash used by financing activities of $182.6 million during 2012.
As of December 31, 2013, our total third party debt was $87.1 million, consisting primarily of $47.0 million of long-term debt borrowed under our $400 million five-year revolving credit facility. During 2013, we had net borrowings of approximately $1.1 million on our revolving credit facility. Also, subsidiaries in other countries had borrowings from banks totaling $40.1 million classified as short-term debt. The increase in net borrowings of short-term debt from the prior year of $9.2 million is driven by a $36.4 million loan under a short-term borrowing with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program.
We received $49.7 million of stock option proceeds during 2013 compared with $28.6 million in 2012. The number of stock options exercised in 2013 and 2012 were 1,602,068 and 1,312,288, respectively.
We also paid $4.6 million during 2013 for the acquisition of the remaining shares in SWAP, our Chinese joint venture.
During 2013, we also paid $243.2 million for share repurchases. As of December 31, 2013, we had the authority to make an additional $379.7 million of share repurchases. Between January 1, 2014 and February 13, 2014, we have repurchased an additional 93,164 shares for a total of $8.5 million.
Cash Flows for 2012 Compared with 2011
Net cash provided by operating activities was $358.3 million for 2012 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $332.0 million for $332.0 million2011 for 2011..
We recorded net income including noncontrolling interests of $312.5$312.5 million for 2012 compared with net income including noncontrolling interests of $368.2 million for $368.2 million2011 for 2011.. Net income for 2012 included noncash elements such as depreciation and amortization of $76.9 million.$76.9 million. Our working capital increase was primarily driven by a reduction in accounts payable due to timing of payments at year end. Inventory levels decreased with business activity, while accounts receivable increased, partially due to late payments from customers. Although we had a positive impact from working capital in the second half of the year, this could not offset entirely the increase of the first half of the year.
The change in other accrued liabilities and taxes was a decrease of $37.9 million for $37.9 million2012 for 2012 compared to a decrease of $4.4 million for $4.4 million2011 for 2011.. The major drivers of this change were tax related items, change in incentive compensation accruals, decreases in freight accruals as well as in short term portion of warranty accruals. The change in other current and long-term assets for 2012 was a decrease of $23.0$23.0 million compared to an increase of $34.8 million for $34.8 million2011 for 2011.. The main drivers of this change were decreases in tax related items and restricted cash related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program. The change in other long-term liabilities for 2012 was an increase of $2.1$2.1 million compared to an increase of $8.6 million for $8.6 million2011 for 2011.. The main drivers were increases in a long term portion of warranty accrual partially offset by sa decrease in long term tax related items which included the release of accruals for uncertain tax positions due to certain government filings in January 2012 as previously disclosed in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K.
The net cash used in investing activities amounted to $105.6 million in $105.6 million2012 in 2012 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $105.2 million in $105.2 million2011 in 2011.. The net cash usage for 2012 includes capital expenditures of $43.2 million of investments in tooling, $48.4$48.5 million on plant and equipment and $8.8$8.8 million in computer software, which supported our market growth and new programs in 2012.2012. Additionally we spent $5.1 million for acquisitions. This compared with $40.1 million of investments in tooling, $58.2 million on plant and equipment and $6.9$6.9 million in computer software in 2011.2011.
The net cash used by financing activities during 2012 amounted to $182.6$182.6 million compared to net cash used by financing activities of $183.5 million during $183.5 million2011 during 2011..
As of December 31, 2012,, our total third party debt was $76.2$76.2 million consisting primarily of $46.3$46.3 million of short-term debt borrowed under our $400 million five-year revolving credit facility. During 2012, we repaid approximately $11.6$11.6 million of debt outstanding at December 31, 2011 on our revolving credit facility. Also, subsidiaries in other countries had borrowings from banks totaling $29.5$29.5 million classified as short-term debt. The increase in net borrowings of short-term debt from the prior year of $3.6$3.6 million is driven by a $27.7$27.7 million loan under a short-term borrowing with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program.
We received $28.6$28.6 million of stock option proceeds during 2012 compared with $36.6 million in $36.6 million2011 in 2011.. The number of stock options exercised in 2012 and 2011 were 1,312,288 and 1,630,838,, respectively.
During 2012, we repurchased shares in the amount of $198.9$198.9 million, of which $2.5 million was not settled until after December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, we had the authority to make an additional $420.6 million of share repurchases. Between January 1, 2013 and February 13, 2013, we have repurchased an additional 88,700 shares for a total of $5.8 million.
Cash Flows for 2011 Compared with 2010
Net cash provided by operating activities was $332.0 million for 2011 compared with net cash used by operating activities of $190.0 million for 2010.
We recorded net income including noncontrolling interests of $368.2 million for 2011 compared with net loss including noncontrolling interests of $214.2 million for 2010. The EC Fine indemnification incurred in 2010 in the amount of $400.4 million was the largest driver for this net loss. Net income for 2011 included noncash elements such as depreciation and
amortization of $78.2 million, as well as an indemnification liability reversal of $23.1 million. Our working capital increased as a result of an increase in business activity. The increase was primarily driven by increased levels of accounts receivable mostly in the first half of the year and which could not be offset by the decrease at the end of the year. Inventory also increased however to a lower extent due to continuous efforts to bring the levels down. In addition to these, there was a decrease in accounts payable due to timing of payments at year end.
The change in other accrued liabilities and taxes was a decrease of $4.4 million for 2011 compared to an increase of $51.0 million for 2010. The major drivers of this change were net tax related items (value added tax, tax on income, tax indemnities), payment of bonuses under our annual incentive plan partially offset by an increase in local bonuses and freight accruals. The change in other current and long-term assets for 2011 was an increase of $34.8 million compared to an increase of $101.7 million for 2010. The main drivers of this change were an increase in notes receivables from our Chinese operation and net tax related items (value added tax, tax receivable on income), partially offset by a decrease of restricted cash related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program. The change in other long-term liabilities for 2011 was an increase of $8.6 million compared to a decrease of $40.1 million for 2010. The main drivers were an increase in tax contingencies partially offset by reclassification of a portion of streamlining costs to current liabilities.
The net cash used in investing activities amounted to $105.2 million in 2011 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $70.7 million in 2010. The net cash usage for 2011 includes capital expenditures of $40.1 million of investments in tooling, $58.2 million on plant and equipment and $6.9 million in computer software, which supported our market growth and new programs in 2011. This compared with $29.2 million of investments in tooling, $36.5 million on plant and equipment and $8.0 million in computer software partially offset by $3.0 million of cash proceeds relating to the sale of a facility during 2010.
The net cash used by financing activities during 2011 amounted to $183.5 million compared to net cash used by financing activities of $15.4 million during 2010.
As of December 31, 2011, our total third party debt was $78.2 million consisting primarily of $52.0 million of long-term debt borrowed under our $400 million five-year revolving credit facility. During 2011, we repaid approximately $46.6 million of debt outstanding at December 31, 2010 on our revolving credit facility. Also, subsidiaries in other countries had borrowings from banks totaling $26.2 million classified as short term debt. The increase in net borrowings of short-term debt from the prior year of $10.4 million is driven by a $24.4 million loan under a short term borrowing with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. related to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program.
We received $36.6 million of stock option proceeds during 2011 compared with $41.8 million in 2010. The number of stock options exercised in 2011 and 2010 were 1,630,838 and 2,231,178, respectively.
During 2011, we repurchased $180.5 million of shares of which $1.7$2.5 million was not settled until after December 31, 2011.2012.
Credit Facility
On July 8, 2011, we entered into a $400 million multi-currency five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility with the lenders and agent banks party thereto, including Banc of America Securities Limited as agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and Banc of America Securities Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., ING Belgium SA/NV, Société Générale Corporate & Investment Banking, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd and The Royal Bank of Scotland NV, (Belgium) Branch, as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners and Credit Lyonnais and Unicredit Bank AG as lead arrangers.
As of December 31, 20122013, this is our principal bank credit facility, and it expires on September 1, 2018. The original expiry date of September 1, 2016. It replaced our prior $800 million multi-currency five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility. was extended in August 2013 to the current expiry date.
Under the revolving credit facility, we may borrow, on a revolving basis, loans in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not in excess of $400 million. Up to $50 million under this facility may be used for issuing letters of credit, of which $48.748.8 million was unused as of December 31, 20122013, and up to $50 million is available in the form of swingline loans, all $50.0 million of which was available for use as of December 31, 20122013. AtAs of December 31, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, the carrying amount of this facility approximated fair value based on levelLevel 2 inputs. The balance outstanding on this facility as of December 31, 20122013, was $46.347.0 million in addition to $1.31.2 million of letters of credit, compared to respectively $52$46.3 million and $1.3 million, atrespectively, as of December 2011.31, 2012. The aggregate interest raterates applicable on loan drawings at as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 1.04% and December 31, 2011 was respectively 0.931% and 1.0963%.0.93%, respectively.
The proceeds of the borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to repurchase WABCO shares, finance acquisitions, refinance existing indebtedness and meet general financing requirements.
Interest on loans under the revolving credit facility is calculated at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin which can vary from 0.80% to 1.55% based on the Company's leverage ratio plus LIBOR for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars, EURIBOR for loans denominated in Euros, HIBOR for loans denominated in Hong Kong Dollars and SIBOR for loans denominated in Singapore Dollars, plus mandatory costs, if any.
The applicable margins used to determine the LIBOR loan rate are determined based upon the Company's leverage ratio, which represents the ratio of our consolidated net indebtedness on the last day of any fiscal quarter to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for certain items) for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day. The revolving credit facility also provides for certain of the borrowers to pay various fees including a participation fee on the amount of the lenders' commitments thereunder.
The revolving credit facility contains terms and provisions (including representations, covenants and conditions) customary for credit agreements of this type. Our primary financial covenant is a leverage test which requires net indebtedness not to exceed three times adjusted four quarter trailing EBITDA. Additional financial covenants include an interest coverage test and a maximum subsidiary indebtedness test. The interest coverage test requires three times interest expense not to exceed adjusted four quarter trailing EBITDA. The maximum subsidiary indebtedness test limits the total aggregate amount of indebtedness of WABCO's subsidiaries, excluding indebtedness under the revolving credit facility, to $400 million, of which not more than $150 million may be secured. Financial covenants are not subject to any future changes in U.S. GAAP accounting standards and all cash on the balance sheet can be deducted for net indebtedness purposes. In addition, expenses and payments related to any streamlining of WABCO’s operations are excluded when calculating the four quarter trailing adjusted EBITDA. Other covenants include delivery of financial reports and other information, compliance with laws including environmental laws and permits, ERISA and U.S. regulations, limitations on liens, mergers and sales of assets and change of business. AtAs of December 31, 20122013 we had the ability to borrow an incremental $352.4351.8 million under our revolving credit facility, and we were in compliance with all the covenants.
As of December 31, 20122013, the Company's various subsidiaries had borrowings from banks totaling $29.540.1 million, of which $27.7$36.4 million relates to our Accounts Receivable Securitization Program, compared to respectively $26.2$29.5 million and $24.4$27.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011.2012. The remaining $1.83.7 million supports local working capital requirements.
Accounts Receivable Securitization Program & Financing Receivables
As discussed above, we have the ability to use our Accounts Receivable Securitization Program as one of several means to manage our liquidity. Under the terms of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program that we entered into with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. ("Socié(Société Générale")rale) on September 23, 2009, we have the ability to sell our accounts receivable directly to Société Générale. The maximum funding from receivables that may be sold into the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Program is €80 million, following the voluntary reduction in January 2013 of the program from €100 million to €80million;€80 million; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient eligible receivables to access the maximum availability. The original term of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program was for one year, with the possibility of four additional annual extensions, assuming the Company and the participating sellers are in compliance with the applicable covenants. The Company extended the Accounts ReceivablesReceivable Securitization Program in September 20122013 for one additional year.
During the year ended December 31, 20122013, the Company sold all of its eligible receivables into the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program. The sold receivables were removed from the balance sheet in accordance with the guidance under ASC topic 860, "Transfers and ServicingServicing". The total amount of receivables sold under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program during the year ended December 31, 20122013 was €731.7790.8 million ($941.11,050.6 million at weighted average December 31, 20122013 year-to-date exchange rates), compared to €816.8€731.7 million ($1,136.8941.1 million at weighted average December 31, 2011exchange2012 exchange rates) during the year ended December 31, 2011.2012. The amount of eligible receivables sold and outstanding at December 31, 20122013 amounted to €67.475.0 million ($89.1103.6 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates), compared to €76.6€67.4 million ($99.389.1 million at December 31, 20112012 exchange rates). in the prior year.
As a result of the sale, accounts receivable decreased by $89.1103.6 million and cash and cash equivalents increased by $51.751.5 million, in 2013, compared to respectively $99.3$89.1 million and $52.5$51.7 million, respectively, in 2011.2012. The remaining amount of proceeds of $37.452.1 million is a subordinated deposit, before the effect of cash collections, with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. at December 31, 20122013, compared to $46.8$37.4 million at December 31, 2011.2012.
As a result of the Company's access to the cash collections of the sold receivables, the companyCompany collected $39.153.9 million of additional cash as of December 31, 20122013. Of these cash receipts, $27.736.4 million is classified on the consolidated
balance sheet as loans payable to bank andbank. The remaining amount of $11.417.5 million reduced the subordinated deposit to $26.034.6 million, the balance of which is classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 20122013.
Also,As of December 31, 2013, the Company hasalso had pledged unsold receivables under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program of €9.83.2 million ($12.94.4 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates), compared to €1.8€9.8 million ($2.312.9 million at December 31, 20112012 exchange rates) in 2011.2012.
The fair value of the receivables sold equaled the carrying cost at time of sale, and no gain or loss was recorded as a result of the sale. The Company estimated the fair value of sold receivables using Level 3 inputs and based the estimate on historical and anticipated performance of similar receivables, including historical and anticipated credit losses (if any). As part of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program, the Company continues to service the receivables. The Company sells the receivables at face value, but receives actual funding net of the subordinated deposit account until collections are received from customers for the receivables sold. The Company is exposed to the credit losses of sold receivables up to the amount of its subordinated deposit account at each settlement date. Credit losses for receivables sold and past due amounts outstanding at December 31, 20122013 were both immaterial. Servicing fees paid for the program were $0.8 million, $1.4 million and $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20122013, 2011 and 2010 respectively.
Other financing receivables include sales to reputable State Owned and Public Enterprises in China that are settled through notes receivable which are registered and endorsed to the Company. These notes receivable are fully secured and generally have contractual maturities of six months or less. These guaranteed notes are available to be discounted with banking institutions in China or transferred to suppliers to settle liabilities. The total amount of notes receivable discounted or transferred for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 2012 and 2011 were $42.8 million, $33.3 million and $$62.8 million, respectively. There were no expenses for the year ended 62.8 millionDecember 31, 2013, respectively, resulting in expenses ofcompared to $0.1 million and $0.6$0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which are included in “Other“other non-operating expense, net.” The carrying amountsfair value of these guaranteed notes receivable areequal their carrying amounts of $41.251.4 million and $40.041.2 million as of December 31, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, respectively, and are included in “other current assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company monitors the credit quality of these notes through historical lossesboth the drawers of the draft and guarantors on a monthly basis by reviewing various factors such as payment history, level of state involvement in the institution, size, national importance as well as current economic conditions with Chinese banks. As these receivables are guaranteed by banks andin China. Since the Company has not experienced any historical losses nor is the Company expecting future credit losses based on a review of the various credit quality indicators described above, we have not established a loss provision against these receivables as of December 31, 20122013 or December 31, 2011.2012.
Factoring Program
On April 15, 2009, we entered into a €35 million factoring program, which has a term of five years, in respect to accounts receivable from one of our customers. To date, we have not utilized this program.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We recognize all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value using Level 2 inputs and these are classified as “other current assets,” “other assets,” “other accrued liabilities” or “other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet. Level 2 inputs used by the Company in valuing its derivative instruments include model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. The earnings impact resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments is recorded in the same line item in the consolidated statement of operations as the underlying exposure being hedged or in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI")(AOCI) for derivatives that qualify and have been designated as cash flow hedges or hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument's change in fair value is recognized in earnings together with changes in the fair value of any derivatives not designated as relationship hedges.
Foreign exchange contracts are used by us to offset the earnings impact relating to the variability in exchange rates on certain monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies and have not been designated as relationship hedges. As of December 31, 20122013, forward contracts for an aggregate notional amount of €43.461.8 million ($57.485.3 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates) were outstanding with an average duration of one month. These foreign exchange contracts have offset the revaluation of assets and liabilities. The combinedliabilities and resulted in a net non-operating loss of $0.1 million for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2012 was $0.4 million2013. The majority of these exchange contracts were entered into on December 28, 201230, 2013. The and have a fair value of the derivatives was immaterial.$0.1 million as of December 31, 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Please see the disclosure above in “Accounts Receivable Securitization Program.”Program”.
Contractual Obligations
Following is a summary of contractual obligations as of December 31, 20122013.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 20122013
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payments due by period(1) |
Contractual Obligation | | Total | | 2013 | | 2014 and 2015 | | 2016 and 2017 | | Beyond 2017 |
| Debt obligations (principal plus interest)(2) | | $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Operating lease obligations(3) | | 68.4 |
| | 18.8 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 12.3 |
|
| Tax indemnifications(4) | | 18.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchase obligations(5) | | 174.0 |
| | 174.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Unfunded pension and post-retirement benefits(6) | | 301.9 |
| | 29.6 |
| | 59.9 |
| | 60.5 |
| | 151.9 |
|
| Tax liabilities(7) | | 47.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | $ | 687.0 |
| | $ | 298.6 |
| | $ | 82.2 |
| | $ | 75.5 |
| | $ | 164.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payments due by period (1) |
Contractual Obligation | | Total | | 2014 | | 2015 and 2016 | | 2017 and 2018 | | Beyond 2018 |
| Debt obligations (2) | | $ | 87.1 |
| | $ | 40.1 |
| | $ | 47.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Operating lease obligations (3) | | 65.5 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 20.8 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 13.1 |
|
| Tax indemnifications (4) | | 9.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchase obligations (5) | | 194.0 |
| | 194.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Unfunded pension and post-retirement benefits (6) | | 313.0 |
| | 31.0 |
| | 62.5 |
| | 62.0 |
| | 157.5 |
|
| Tax liabilities (7) | | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | $ | 714.1 |
| | $ | 282.3 |
| | $ | 130.3 |
| | $ | 76.4 |
| | $ | 170.6 |
|
| |
| (1) | The amounts and timing of such obligations, as shown in the table may vary substantially from amounts that will actually be paid in future years. For example, the actual amount to be paid under debt obligations under our revolving credit facility will depend on the amount of debt outstanding under the agreement in each year. |
| |
| (2) | Amounts shown for debt obligations include thean immaterial amount of associated interest amounting to $0.1 million, calculated atbased on the December 31, 20122013 rates applicable to each type of debt. |
| |
| (3) | Amounts include future rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2012.2013. |
| |
| (4) | Amounts are probable and estimable costs that the Company is responsible for under a Tax Sharing Agreement between Trane and WABCO. The entire $18.89.2 million is classified as long term and the Company is currently unable to estimate the timing of the potential amounts to be paid. |
| |
| (5) | In the normal course of business we expect to purchase approximately $1.51.7 billion in 20132014 of materials and services, and estimate that on average no more than approximately $174.0$194.0 million is outstanding at any one time in the form of legally binding commitments. We spent approximately $1.6 billion, $1.5 billion $1.7 billion and $1.3$1.7 billion on materials and services in 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, respectively. |
| |
| (6) | Amounts represent undiscounted projected benefit payments to WABCO's unfunded plans over the next ten years, as well as expected contributions to funded pension plans for 2013.2014. The expected benefit payments are estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure our accumulated benefit obligation at the end of 20122013 and include benefits attributable to estimated future employee service of current employees. |
| |
| (7) | Amounts represent the Company's unrecognized tax benefits (including interest of $5.7 million)provisions potentially owed to tax authorities as described in Note 15 - Income Taxes.of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining $42.0total liability of $45.3 million liability is classified as long term and theincludes interest of $6.0 million. The Company is currently unable to estimate the timing of potential amounts to be paid. |
Capital Expenditures
We believe our capital spending in recent years has been sufficient to maintain efficient production capacity, to implement important product and process redesigns and to expand capacity to meet increased demand. Productivity projects have freed up capacity in our manufacturing facilities and are expected to continue to do so. We expect to continue investing to expand and modernize our existing facilities and invest in our facilities to create capacity for new product development.development and, as discussed above, we expect to increase our capital spending in 2014 due to the construction of a new plant in Poland.
Pending Adoptions of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
We do not expect the pending adoption of recently issued accounting standards to have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with those accounting principles requires us to make judgments and
estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Those judgments and estimates have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements because they result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We frequently re-evaluate our judgments and estimates that are based upon historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
We believe that of our significant accounting policies (see Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the ones that may involve a higher degree of uncertainty, judgment and complexity are allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, property, plant and equipment, goodwill, stock-based compensation, post-retirement benefits, warranties, income taxes, and contingencies.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts-The- The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. In determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, on a monthly basis, WABCO analyzes the aging of accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, availability of credit insurance and current economic trends. Though management considers the valuation of the allowances proper and adequate, changes in the economy and/or deterioration of the financial condition of the Company's customers could affect the reserve balances required. Historically, this valuation has proved to be a reasonable estimate of the Company's experience with doubtful debts.
Inventory Reserves-On a quarterly basis, the Company tests its inventory for slow moving and obsolete stock by considering both the historical and expected sales and the Company will record a provision, if needed. Historically, this policy has given a close approximation of the Company's experience with slow moving and obsolete inventory. From time to time unusual buying patterns or shifts in demand may cause large movements in the reserve.
Property, Plant & Equipment-Property, plant and equipment balances are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. WABCO capitalizes costs, including interest during construction of fixed asset additions, improvements, and betterments that add to productive capacity or extend the asset life. WABCO assesses facilities for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill-The- The Company has a significant amount of goodwill on its balance sheet that is not amortized, but subject to impairment tests each fiscal year on October 1st or more often when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company's impairment tests utilize the two-step approach. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The recoverability of goodwill is measured based on one reporting unit for the total Company. WABCO's plants, engineering, technical support, distribution centers and other support functions are shared among various product families and serve all distribution channels with many customers. Based on the organizational structure, as well as the nature of financial information available and reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions about resource allocations, the Company has concluded that its total WABCO operations represent one reportable unit and that WABCO's performance and future net cash flow perspectives are best understood and assessed as such. In order to approximate the fair value of the reporting unit for purposes of testing recoverability, we use the total market capitalization of the Company, a market approach, which is then compared to the total book value of the Company. In the event the Company's fair value has fallen below book value, the Company will compare the estimated fair value of goodwill to its book value. If the book value of goodwill exceeds the estimated fair value of goodwill, the Company will recognize the difference as an impairment loss in operating income. There has been no impairment of goodwill during 2012,2013, and the Company's goodwill was not at risk for failing the first step of its impairment test.
Stock-Based Compensation-The- The Company measures and recognizes in its combinedconsolidated statement of incomeoperations the expense associated with all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including stock options, restricted stock units, performance stock units and restricted stock grants based on estimated fair values. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model to measure the amount of compensation expense to be recognized for each option award. There are several assumptions that must be made when using the Black-Scholes model such as the expected term of each option, the expected volatility of the stock price during the expected term of the option, the expected dividends to be paid and the risk free interest rate expected during the option term. The risk free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury securities that
correspond to the expected holding period of the options. WABCO reviewed the historic volatility of its common stock over a four year period, the common stock of its peer group over a five year period, and the implied volatility for at the money options to purchase shares of its common stock. The five yearfive-year historical volatility period was selected since that period corresponds with the expected holding period. Based on this data, the Company chose to use a weighted average of the implied volatility of WABCO, the most recent four year historical volatility of WABCO and the median most recent one year historical volatility of WABCO's peer group prior to the spin-off date. The expected holding period was calculated by reviewing the historical exercise pattern of all holders that were granted options and the exercise behavior of officers versus non-officers. The results of the analysis support one expected holding period for all groups of employees. The expected forfeiture rate was determined based on the historical stock option forfeiture data of the Company. The dividend yield was based on an expected future dividend rate for the period at the time of grant. Of these assumptions, the expected term of the option and expected volatility of WABCO's common stock are the most difficult to estimate since they are based on the exercise behavior of employees and expected performance of WABCO's stock. An increase in the volatility of WABCO's stock will increase the amount of compensation expense on new awards. An increase in the holding period of options will also cause an increase in compensation expense. Dividend yields and risk-free interest rates are less difficult to estimate. An increase in the dividend yield will cause a decrease in expense and an increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.
Commencing in 2013, the Company will replacereplaced stock options with performance sharestock units (PSUs), the vesting of which would occur if at all, and at levels ranging from none to 200% of the number of granted PSUs depending upon the achievement of three-year cumulative performance earnings per share goals approved by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. See also Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Post-Retirement Benefits- The Company has significant pension and post-retirement benefit costs and liabilities that are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions including discount rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, merit and promotion increases and the health care cost trend rate. The Company is required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates and health care costs, in making its assumptions. Changes in the related pension and post-retirement benefit costs or liabilities may occur in the future due to changes in the assumptions. The assumptions as to the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are based upon the composition of plan assets, historical long-term rates of return on similar assets and current and expected market conditions. The discount rate used for U.S. plans reflects the market rate for high-quality fixed-income investments on the Company's annual measurement date (December 31) and is subject to change each year. The discount rate was determined by matching, on an approximate basis, the coupons and maturities for a portfolio of corporate bonds (rated AaAA or better by Moody's Investor Services) to the expected plan benefit payments defined by the projected benefit obligation. The discount rates used for plans outside the U.S.United States are based on a combination of relevant indices regarding corporate and government securities, the duration of the liability and appropriate judgment. A decrease of one percentage point in the assumed rate of
return on plan assets and a decrease of one percentage point in the discount rate applied to projected benefit obligations would increase annual pension expense by approximately $6.97.6 million. An increase of one percentage point in the assumed health care cost trend rate in each future year would not materially increase annual health insurance costs. The impact of Health Care Reform legislation in the U.S.United States. is immaterial to WABCO. See the disclosures about pension and post-retirement obligations, the composition of plan assets, assumptions and other matters in Note 12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Warranties- Products sold by WABCO are covered by a basic limited warranty with terms and conditions that vary depending upon the product and country in which it was sold. The limited warranty covers the equipment, parts and labor (in certain cases) necessary to satisfy the warranty obligation generally for a period of two years. Estimated product warranty expenses are accrued in cost of goods sold at the time the related sale is recognized. Estimates of warranty expenses are based primarily on warranty claims experience and specific customer contracts. Warranty expenses include accruals for basic warranties for product sold, as well as accruals for product recalls, service campaigns and other related events when they are known and estimable.
To the extent we experience changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims, our warranty accrual is adjusted accordingly. Warranty accrual estimates are updated based upon the most current warranty claims information available. The Company's warranty costs as a percentage of net sales totaled 0.8% in 2013, 1.1% in 20121.5% in 2011 and 1.5% in 2010.2011. We do not expect this percentage to change materially in the near future. See Note 14 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a three-year summary of warranty costs.
Income taxes-We- We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to decrease the net deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to increase the net deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. Deferred tax assets have been reduced byWe calculate a
valuation allowance of $240.2 million at December 31, 2012 foreign exchange rates related to foreign net operating losses. We calculated this valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income“Income Taxes,” which requires an assessment of both positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets, when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards, applicable tax rates and tax planning strategies. We review the valuation allowance quarterly and maintain it until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal.
Because evidence such as our historical operating results during
In 2013, the most recent years is afforded more weight than forecasted results for future periods, our cumulative loss during the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 represents sufficient negative evidence regarding the needCompany recorded a tax benefit of $178.4 million for a fullrelease at the end of the year of a valuation allowance under ASC 740. We will release this valuation allowance when management determinesrelated to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. In particular, evidence such as our historical operating profits resulting in a cumulative profitable position during the three-year period ending on December 31, 2013, the receipt of an exceptional EC fine refund in the fourth quarter of 2013 and projected operating profits represented sufficient positive evidence to release a full valuation allowance at the end of 2013 on the deferred tax asset under ASC 740.
Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize $10.1 million of its deferred tax assets will be realized. We may be requiredin other foreign jurisdictions since evidence such as historical operating profits resulted in a cumulative loss position during the most recent three-year period ending on December 31, 2013 and lack of projected earnings provided sufficient negative evidence to release all orrecord a portion of this valuation allowance in the next 12 months, although the exact timingagainst such deferred tax assets related to carryforwards for net operating losses and the portion of the valuation allowance released are subject to the level of profitability that we are able to actually achieve for the year and our visibility into future period results.notional interest deductions.
We expect that the
The release of the $178.4 millionvaluation allowance will bewas recorded as an income tax benefit at the time of release,December 31, 2013 which significantly increasing our reported net income, thus, significantly reducingreduced our effective tax rate, and likely resulting in a negative effective tax rate. However, weWe expect our effective tax rate to increase in subsequent periods following any significantthis release of the valuation allowance. Our net income and effective tax rate will be negatively affected in periods following thethis release. However, any valuation allowance release will not affect the amount of cash paid for income taxes.
We also estimate our effective income tax rate quarterly, considering all known factors and the estimated effects of future events or tax planning strategies that can cause that rate to vary from the statutory rate. Estimating the outcome of future events is inherently uncertain and final resolution of those events can cause the effective tax rate to vary significantly. In addition, changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws or rulings may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.
A tax position is a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax filing that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax positions shall be recognized only when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%), based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold should be measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a tax position, is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances of that position evaluated in light of all available evidence. Tax positions are not permitted to be recognized, derecognized, or remeasured due to changes subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Rather, these changes are recorded in the period the change occurs with appropriate disclosure of such subsequent events, if significant. The Company accrues interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
In situations where the Company has tax deductions that would otherwise increase a deferred tax asset related to net operating losses, a tax deduction which is treated as an uncertain tax position is recorded as a reduction of the deferred tax asset on the balance sheet. In this regard, although the uncertain tax position wasis not reflected as an unrecognized tax benefit in the balance sheet as a recorded liability, it is disclosed in the tabular rollforward for unrecognized tax benefits in the notesNote 15 of Notes to the financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contingencies-We- We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to products and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable and reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of liability to be recorded, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. It is reasonably possible that the Company could incur losses in excess of the amounts accrued. Although this amount cannot be estimated, we believe that any additional losses would not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In conjunction with the Tax Sharing Agreement, as further discussed in Note 16 - Tax and Indemnification Liabilities Transferred from Trane to WABCO, inof Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, WABCO is responsible for certain tax and indemnification liabilities. These liabilities include indemnification liabilities to Trane of $18.89.2 million.
Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business
The industry in which we operate is cyclical. Approximately 71% of our sales are for newly manufactured trucks, buses and trailers, the production of which follows long investment cycles and are impacted by macro economic factors and
legislation. Global commercial vehicle production was consistently growing since 2001. In the fourth quarter of 2008, however, the global commercial vehicle markets started to experience a significant decline that was unprecedented in its breadth, depth and speed which continued through 2009. All markets experienced favorable growth in 2010 while our most developed markets again experienced favorable growth in 2011. 2012 saw most markets decline with only our markets in North America and Japan experiencing growth. In 2013 we saw mixed performances across the various markets with some geographies up double digit while others were down double digit. The overall market ticked up slightly in 2013. Our markets are difficult to predict; however, in 20132014 we are again anticipating mixed markets with a few estimated to grow and others anticipatedwhere most are expected to be flat to down versus 2012.2013 with the exception of the North America market which is expected to grow. The continued adoption of new technologies by truck and bus manufacturers helps our business outperform the rate of truck and bus production over the longer term. The commercial vehicle industry is not subject to material seasonal impacts.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to financial risk resulting from volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. All of those risks are closely monitored.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
We conduct operations through controlled subsidiaries in most of the major countries of Western Europe, Brazil, Poland, China, South Korea, India and Japan as well as the US.United States. In addition, we conduct business in many countries through cross border sales and purchases, affiliated companies and partnerships in which we own 50% or less of the stock or partnership interest. As our financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars, fluctuations in currency exchange rates can have a significant impact on the reported results of our operations, especially for the countries and currencies referred to above. Applying a Value-At-Risk (“VAR”)(VAR) methodology to our foreign currency exchange rate exposure, across the translational cash flow and balance sheettransactional exposures for the year 2012,2013, the potential maximum loss in earnings is estimated to be $12$22 million which is based on a 1- yearone-year horizon and a 95 % confidence level. The VAR model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair value that could be incurred by us, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market
factors or our ability to pass on foreign exchange effects to commercial counterparties. See also Note 19 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
All of the Company's financial debt and investments are based on floating rates. Even material moves of the interest rates, based on the weighted average of net outstanding interest bearing debt in 2012,2013, would have an immaterial effect on our 20122013 earnings.
Commodity Exposures
We are also exposed to fluctuations in commodity prices through the purchase of base metals and steel, mainly through contractual agreements with component suppliers.
Applying a VAR methodology to thisour 2013 commodity exposure, the potential maximum loss in earnings is estimated to be $25$15 million which is based on a 1-yearone-year horizon and a 95 % confidence level. The VAR model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair value that could be incurred by us, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market factors or our ability to pass on effects to commercial counterparties.
| |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of WABCO Holdings Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, / (loss),cash flows and cash flowsshareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012.2013. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) and our report dated February 15, 201313, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA/Reviseurs d'Entreprises SCCRL
Represented by:
/s/ Harry Everaerts,Piet Hemschoote, Partner
Brussels, Belgium
February 15, 201313, 2014
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions, except share and per share data) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Sales | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | $ | 2,175.7 |
| $ | 2,720.5 |
| | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
|
| Cost of sales | 1,737.2 |
| | 1,986.1 |
| | 1,560.6 |
| 1,911.4 |
| | 1,737.2 |
| | 1,986.1 |
|
| Gross Profit | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
| | 615.1 |
| 809.1 |
| | 740.2 |
| | 808.0 |
|
| Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling and administrative expenses | 308.2 |
| | 327.2 |
| | 306.6 |
| 352.8 |
| | 308.2 |
| | 327.2 |
|
| Product engineering expenses | 104.3 |
| | 105.1 |
| | 85.9 |
| 119.4 |
| | 104.3 |
| | 105.1 |
|
| Other operating expense, net | 3.2 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 5.0 |
| 5.0 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 5.8 |
|
| Operating income | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
| | 217.6 |
| 331.9 |
| | 324.5 |
| | 369.9 |
|
| European Commission fine indemnification | — |
| | — |
| | (400.4 | ) | |
| European Commission fine reimbursement | | 279.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Equity income of unconsolidated joint ventures, net | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 9.9 |
| 17.7 |
| | 18.1 |
| | 16.5 |
|
| Other non-operating expense, net | (5.0 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | |
| Indemnification settlements, net | — |
| | 23.1 |
| | — |
| |
| Interest expense, net | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | |
| Income / (loss) before income taxes | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
| | (177.3 | ) | |
| Income tax expense | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
| | 36.9 |
| |
| Net income / (loss) including noncontrolling interests | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
| | (214.2 | ) | |
| Other non-operating income/(expense), net | | 6.9 |
| | (5.0 | ) | | 20.2 |
|
| Interest income/(expense), net | | 4.9 |
| | (1.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | | 640.9 |
| | 336.1 |
| | 404.9 |
|
| Income tax (benefit)/expense | | (21.0 | ) | | 23.6 |
| | 36.7 |
|
| Net income including noncontrolling interests | | 661.9 |
| | 312.5 |
| | 368.2 |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| 8.7 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 11.2 |
|
| Net income / (loss) attributable to Company | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
| | $ | (226.1 | ) | |
| Net income / (loss) attributable to Company per common share | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Company | | $ | 653.2 |
| | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 357.0 |
|
| Net income attributable to Company per common share | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 4.73 |
| | $ | 5.35 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | 10.46 |
| | $ | 4.73 |
| | $ | 5.35 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 4.62 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
| | $ | (3.50 | ) | $ | 10.31 |
| | $ | 4.62 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
|
| Cash dividends per share of common stock | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 63,906,992 |
| | 66,693,064 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| 62,474,493 |
| | 63,906,992 |
| | 66,693,064 |
|
| Diluted | 65,323,389 |
| | 68,829,440 |
| | 64,562,222 |
| 63,382,564 |
| | 65,323,389 |
| | 68,829,440 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended |
| | December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| Net income/(loss) including noncontrolling interests | $ | 312.5 |
| | $ | 368.2 |
| | $ | (214.2 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation effects | (0.8 | ) | | (54.4 | ) | | (52.1 | ) |
| Unrealized (losses)/gains on benefit plans, net of tax | (56.6 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | (3.0 | ) |
| Prior service cost arising during period (net of taxes of $0.1 in 2012) | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net actuarial loss arising during the period (net of taxes of $25.3 in 2012, $1.1 in 2011 and $1.5 in 2010) | (58.1 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (5.1 | ) |
| Recognized net actuarial gain (net of taxes of $0.6 in 2012, $0.7 in 2011 and $0.8 in 2010) | 1.5 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Less: amortization of prior service cost (net of taxes $0.1 in each year) | (0.1 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Comprehensive income/(loss) including noncontrolling interests | $ | 255.1 |
| | $ | 313.9 |
| | $ | (269.3 | ) |
| Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 9.1 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 13.4 |
|
| Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Company | $ | 246.0 |
| | $ | 308.3 |
| | $ | (282.7 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended |
| | December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Net income including noncontrolling interests | $ | 661.9 |
| | $ | 312.5 |
| | $ | 368.2 |
|
| Foreign currency translation effects | (4.1 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (54.4 | ) |
| Unrealized (losses)/gains on benefit plans, net of tax | (1.8 | ) | | (56.6 | ) | | 0.1 |
|
| Prior service cost arising during period (net of taxes of $0.1 in 2012) | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| Net actuarial loss arising during the period (net of taxes of $1.4 in 2013, $25.3 in 2012 and $1.1 in 2011) | (6.7 | ) | | (58.1 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| Recognized net actuarial gain (net of taxes of $2.0 in 2013, $0.6 in 2012 and $0.7 in 2011) | 4.8 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Less: amortization of prior service cost (net of taxes of $0 in 2013 and $0.1 in 2012 and 2011) | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 0.1 |
|
| Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests | $ | 656.0 |
| | $ | 255.1 |
| | $ | 313.9 |
|
| Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3.6 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 5.6 |
|
| Comprehensive income attributable to Company | $ | 652.4 |
| | $ | 246.0 |
| | $ | 308.3 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | December 31,
2012 | | December 31,
2011 | December 31,
2013 | | December 31,
2012 |
| (Amounts in millions, except share data) | | | | | | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 175.0 |
| | $ | 102.4 |
| $ | 472.8 |
| | $ | 175.0 |
|
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.6 in 2012 and $3.4 in 2011 | 301.5 |
| | 296.3 |
| |
| Short-term investments | | 55.2 |
| | — |
|
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.0 in 2013 and $3.6 in 2012 | | 346.2 |
| | 301.5 |
|
| Inventories | 191.8 |
| | 198.0 |
| 207.2 |
| | 191.8 |
|
| Taxes receivable on income | — |
| | 18.5 |
| |
| Future income tax benefits | 13.8 |
| | 8.7 |
| 10.4 |
| | 13.8 |
|
| Restricted cash | 26.0 |
| | 34.4 |
| 34.6 |
| | 26.0 |
|
| Guaranteed notes receivable | 41.2 |
| | 40.0 |
| 51.4 |
| | 41.2 |
|
| Other current assets | 43.3 |
| | 52.4 |
| 56.8 |
| | 43.3 |
|
| Total current assets | 792.6 |
| | 750.7 |
| 1,234.6 |
| | 792.6 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation | 389.0 |
| | 357.4 |
| 422.5 |
| | 389.0 |
|
| Goodwill | 371.7 |
| | 363.9 |
| 381.2 |
| | 371.7 |
|
| Long-term future income tax benefits | 91.5 |
| | 58.8 |
| 248.9 |
| | 91.5 |
|
| Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 20.5 |
| | 16.5 |
| 19.9 |
| | 20.5 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 39.4 |
| | 35.6 |
| 44.3 |
| | 39.4 |
|
| Other assets | 42.3 |
| | 40.3 |
| 41.4 |
| | 42.3 |
|
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 1,747.0 |
| | $ | 1,623.2 |
| $ | 2,392.8 |
| | $ | 1,747.0 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Loans payable to banks | $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | 26.2 |
| $ | 40.1 |
| | $ | 76.2 |
|
| Accounts payable | 115.4 |
| | 137.8 |
| 149.3 |
| | 115.4 |
|
| Accrued payroll | 94.2 |
| | 108.1 |
| 118.8 |
| | 94.2 |
|
| Current portion of warranties | 33.8 |
| | 42.3 |
| 29.8 |
| | 33.8 |
|
| Taxes payable | 5.7 |
| | — |
| 3.8 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Indemnification liabilities | — |
| | 11.2 |
| |
| Income tax liabilities | — |
| | 4.9 |
| |
| Accrued expenses | | 58.7 |
| | 40.9 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 120.4 |
| | 121.1 |
| 84.9 |
| | 79.5 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 445.7 |
| | 451.6 |
| 485.4 |
| | 445.7 |
|
| Long-term debt | — |
| | 52.0 |
| 47.0 |
| | — |
|
| Post-retirement benefits | 430.6 |
| | 348.6 |
| 438.6 |
| | 430.6 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | 29.9 |
| | 25.8 |
| 120.1 |
| | 29.9 |
|
| Long-term income tax liabilities | 47.7 |
| | 67.0 |
| 45.3 |
| | 47.7 |
|
| Other liabilities | 64.4 |
| | 42.4 |
| 59.0 |
| | 64.4 |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,018.3 |
| | 987.4 |
| 1,195.4 |
| | 1,018.3 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies | — |
| | — |
| |
| Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock, 4,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 75,755,306 in 2012; 74,242,930 in 2011; and shares outstanding: 62,747,151 in 2012; 64,765,655 in 2011 | 0.7 |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 77,471,174 in 2013; 75,755,306 in 2012; and shares outstanding: 61,359,025 in 2013; 62,747,151 in 2012 | | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Capital surplus | 735.5 |
| | 693.4 |
| 800.2 |
| | 735.5 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost: 13,008,155 shares in 2012; 9,477,275 shares in 2011 | (655.8 | ) | | (456.8 | ) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost: 16,112,149 shares in 2013; 13,008,155 shares in 2012 | | (896.6 | ) | | (655.8 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 718.6 |
| | 416.6 |
| 1,371.8 |
| | 718.6 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income: | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (15.4 | ) | | (16.1 | ) | (14.4 | ) | | (15.4 | ) |
| Unrealized losses on benefit plans, net of tax | (107.2 | ) | | (50.6 | ) | (109.0 | ) | | (107.2 | ) |
| Total shareholders’ equity | 676.4 |
| | 587.2 |
| 1,152.8 |
| | 676.4 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests | 52.3 |
| | 48.6 |
| 44.6 |
| | 52.3 |
|
| Total equity | 728.7 |
| | 635.8 |
| 1,197.4 |
| | 728.7 |
|
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 1,747.0 |
| | 1,623.2 |
| $ | 2,392.8 |
| | $ | 1,747.0 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income / (loss) including noncontrolling interests | $ | 312.5 |
| | $ | 368.2 |
| | $ | (214.2 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income / (loss) to net cash provided / (used) by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net income including noncontrolling interests | | $ | 661.9 |
| | $ | 312.5 |
| | $ | 368.2 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided / (used) by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 65.6 |
| | 66.4 |
| | 66.3 |
| 74.6 |
| | 65.6 |
| | 66.4 |
|
| Amortization of intangibles | 11.3 |
| | 11.8 |
| | 17.0 |
| 10.6 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 11.8 |
|
| Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net of dividends received | (3.0 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | 0.6 |
| | (3.0 | ) | | (2.1 | ) |
| Non-cash stock compensation | 14.3 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 13.0 |
| 13.6 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 13.7 |
|
| Deferred income tax (expense) / benefit | (2.9 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | (2.6 | ) | |
| Loss on sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment | 0.3 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 7.4 |
| |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) / expense | | (64.6 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | 1.9 |
|
| (Gain)/loss on sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment | | (0.2 | ) | | 0.3 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Indemnification settlements, net | — |
| | (23.1 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | (23.1 | ) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net | (6.2 | ) | | (40.1 | ) | | (3.8 | ) | (44.3 | ) | | (6.2 | ) | | (40.1 | ) |
| Inventories | 5.7 |
| | (14.8 | ) | | (41.8 | ) | (16.0 | ) | | 5.7 |
| | (14.8 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (23.0 | ) | | (18.1 | ) | | 50.3 |
| 33.1 |
| | (23.0 | ) | | (18.1 | ) |
| Other accrued liabilities and taxes | (37.9 | ) | | (4.4 | ) | | 51.0 |
| 38.5 |
| | (37.9 | ) | | (4.4 | ) |
| Post - retirement benefits | (3.5 | ) | | (2.3 | ) | | 10.7 |
| (3.4 | ) | | (3.5 | ) | | (2.3 | ) |
| Other current and long-term assets | 23.0 |
| | (34.8 | ) | | (101.7 | ) | (28.8 | ) | | 23.0 |
| | (34.8 | ) |
| Other long-term liabilities | 2.1 |
| | 8.6 |
| | (40.1 | ) | (9.8 | ) | | 2.1 |
| | 8.6 |
|
| Net cash provided / (used) by operating activities | 358.3 |
| | 332.0 |
| | (190.0 | ) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | 665.8 |
| | 358.3 |
| | 332.0 |
|
| Investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (91.7 | ) | | (98.3 | ) | | (65.7 | ) | (108.1 | ) | | (91.7 | ) | | (98.3 | ) |
| Investments in capitalized software | (8.8 | ) | | (6.9 | ) | | (8.0 | ) | (13.4 | ) | | (8.8 | ) | | (6.9 | ) |
| Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
| |
| Purchases of short-term investments | | (55.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisitions, net | (5.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | (5.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (105.6 | ) | | (105.2 | ) | | (70.7 | ) | (176.7 | ) | | (105.6 | ) | | (105.2 | ) |
| Financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net repayments of revolving credit facilities | (11.6 | ) | | (46.6 | ) | | (66.4 | ) | |
| Net borrowings/(repayments) of revolving credit facilities | | 1.1 |
| | (11.6 | ) | | (46.6 | ) |
| Borrowings / (payments) of capital leases | 0.6 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.2 | ) |
| Net borrowings of short-term debt | 3.6 |
| | 10.4 |
| | 13.9 |
| 9.2 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 10.4 |
|
| Purchases of treasury stock | (198.3 | ) | | (178.9 | ) | | — |
| (243.2 | ) | | (198.3 | ) | | (178.9 | ) |
| Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest | | (4.6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Dividends to noncontrolling interest holders | (5.5 | ) | | (4.8 | ) | | (4.3 | ) | (5.6 | ) | | (5.5 | ) | | (4.8 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 28.6 |
| | 36.6 |
| | 41.8 |
| 49.7 |
| | 28.6 |
| | 36.6 |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (182.6 | ) | | (183.5 | ) | | (15.4 | ) | (193.4 | ) | | (182.6 | ) | | (183.5 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2.5 |
| | (8.0 | ) | | (7.0 | ) | 2.1 |
| | 2.5 |
| | (8.0 | ) |
| Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 72.6 |
| | 35.3 |
| | (283.1 | ) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 297.8 |
| | 72.6 |
| | 35.3 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 102.4 |
| | 67.1 |
| | 350.2 |
| 175.0 |
| | 102.4 |
| | 67.1 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 175.0 |
| | $ | 102.4 |
| | $ | 67.1 |
| $ | 472.8 |
| | $ | 175.0 |
| | $ | 102.4 |
|
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | 1.9 |
| $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Income taxes | $ | 30.3 |
| | $ | 54.1 |
| | 47.9 |
| $ | 45.2 |
| | $ | 30.3 |
| | 54.1 |
|
| Non cash items for the period: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Treasury stock purchase accrual | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | 1.7 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Common Stock | | Capital Surplus | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | Foreign
Currency
Translation | Unrealized Losses on Benefit Plans, net of tax | | Non Controlling Interests | | Common Stock | | Capital Surplus | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | Foreign
Currency
Translation, net of tax | Unrealized Losses on Benefit Plans, net of tax | | Non Controlling Interests | |
| Balance at December 31, 2009 | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 591.5 |
| | $ | (276.3 | ) | | $ | 285.7 |
| | $ | 88.4 |
| $ | (49.9 | ) | | $ | 38.8 |
| | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (226.1 | ) | | | | 11.9 |
| | |
| Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | (55.4 | ) | 1.8 |
| | 1.5 |
| | |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | — |
| | 41.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 13.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | |
| Other stock issued | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (4.3 | ) | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2010 | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 646.4 |
| | $ | (276.3 | ) | | $ | 59.6 |
| | $ | 33.0 |
| $ | (51.1 | ) | | $ | 47.9 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 646.4 |
| | $ | (276.3 | ) | | $ | 59.6 |
| | $ | 33.0 |
| $ | (51.1 | ) | | $ | 47.9 |
| |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 357.0 |
| | | | 11.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 357.0 |
| | | | 11.2 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | (49.1 | ) | 0.4 |
| | (5.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | (49.1 | ) | 0.4 |
| | (5.7 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | 0.1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — |
| 0.1 |
| | | |
| Treasury stock purchased | — |
| | — |
| | (180.5 | ) | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | (180.5 | ) | | | | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | — |
| | 36.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
| | 36.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
| | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Other stock issued | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (4.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (4.8 | ) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 693.4 |
| | $ | (456.8 | ) | | $ | 416.6 |
| | $ | (16.1 | ) | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 48.6 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 693.4 |
| | $ | (456.8 | ) | | $ | 416.6 |
| | $ | (16.1 | ) | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 48.6 |
| |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 302.0 |
| | | | 10.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 302.0 |
| | | | 10.5 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | 0.7 |
| — |
| | (1.4 | ) | | | | | | | | | | 0.7 |
| — |
| | (1.4 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | (56.6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | — |
| (56.6 | ) | | | |
| Treasury stock purchased | — |
| | — |
| | (199.0 | ) | | — |
| | | | | | — |
| | — |
| | (199.0 | ) | | — |
| | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | — |
| | 28.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
| | 28.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 13.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
| | 13.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Other stock issued | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (5.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (5.4 | ) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 735.5 |
| | $ | (655.8 | ) | | $ | 718.6 |
| | $ | (15.4 | ) | $ | (107.2 | ) | | $ | 52.3 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 735.5 |
| | $ | (655.8 | ) | | $ | 718.6 |
| | $ | (15.4 | ) | $ | (107.2 | ) | | $ | 52.3 |
| |
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 653.2 |
| | | | 8.7 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | | 1.0 |
| — |
| | (5.1 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | (1.8 | ) | | | |
| Treasury stock purchased | | — |
| | — |
| | (240.8 | ) | | — |
| | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | | 0.1 |
| | 49.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | — |
| | 13.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | |
| Change in noncontrolling interest | | — |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (5.7 | ) | |
| Dividends paid | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | (5.6 | ) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 800.2 |
| | $ | (896.6 | ) | | $ | 1,371.8 |
| | $ | (14.4 | ) | $ | (109.0 | ) | | $ | 44.6 |
| |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 20122013
| |
| NOTE 1. | Description of Company |
WABCO Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “WABCO” or the “Company”“the Company”) develops, manufactures and sells advanced braking, stability, suspension and transmission control systems primarily for commercial vehicles. WABCO’s largest selling products are pneumatic anti-lock braking systems (“ABS”)(ABS), electronic braking systems (“EBS”)(EBS), automated manual transmission systems, air disc brakes and a large variety of conventional mechanical products such as actuators, air compressors and air control valves for heavy and medium-sized trucks, trailers and buses. We also supply advanced electronic suspension controls and vacuum pumps to the car and SUV markets in Europe, North America and Asia. In addition, we sell replacement parts, diagnostic tools, training, remanufacturing and other services to commercial vehicle aftermarket distributors, repair shops, and fleet operators. WABCO sells its products to four groups of customers around the world: truck and bus original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”)(OEMs), trailer OEMs, aftermarket distributors of replacement parts and services and automotive OEMs.
WABCO was founded in the United States in 1869 as Westinghouse Air Brake Company. The Company was purchased by American Standard Companies Inc. (or “American Standard”)(American Standard) in 1968 and operated as the Vehicle Control Systems business division within American Standard until the Company was spun off from American Standard on July 31, 2007. Subsequent to the spin-off, American Standard changed its name to Trane Inc., which is herein referred to as “Trane.” On June 5, 2008, Trane was acquired in a merger with Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited (“Ingersoll Rand”)(Ingersoll Rand) and exists today as a wholly owned subsidiary of Ingersoll Rand.
The spin-off by Trane of its Vehicle Control Systems business became effective on July 31, 2007, through a distribution of 100% of the common stock of WABCO to Trane's shareholders (the “Distribution”)Distribution). The Distribution was effected through a separation and distribution agreement pursuant to which Trane distributed all of the shares of WABCO common stock as a dividend on Trane common stock, in the amount of one share of WABCO common stock for every three shares of outstanding Trane common stock to each shareholder on the record date. Trane received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service and an opinion from tax counsel indicating that the spin-off was tax free to the shareholders of Trane and WABCO.
Based on the organizational structure, as well as the nature of financial information available and reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions about resource allocations, the Company has concluded that its total WABCO operations represent one reportable segment and that WABCO’s performance and future net cash flow perspectives are best understood and assessed as such. For purposes of cash flow presentation, the Company has presented both cash flow activities for the revolving credit facilities and short-term debt on a net presentation basis as these items represent cash flow activities wherewith high turnover is quick, the amounts areand large and the maturities are short.amounts.
NOTE 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
| |
| NOTE 2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Use of Estimates-The- The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management believes the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the condensed consolidated financial statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of the most significant estimates included in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are related to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, property, plant and equipment, goodwill, warranties, post-retirement benefits, income taxes and stock-based compensation. Allocation methods are described in the notes to these consolidated financial statements where appropriate.
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation-All- All majority owned or controlled subsidiaries of WABCO are included in the consolidated financial statements and intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. WABCO investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are included at cost plus its equity in undistributed earnings in accordance with the equity method of accounting and reflected as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheet. Certain amounts in the prior years' consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Foreign Currency Translation-Adjustments- Adjustments resulting from translating foreign functional currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollarsDollars at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts at the average exchange rates in effect during the period, are recorded in a separate component of shareholders' equity.equity as accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains or losses resulting from transactions in
other than the functional currency are reflected in the
consolidated statement of operations as part of other non-operating income or expense, except for intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature.nature where the foreign exchange gains or losses from the remeasurement of such intercompany transactions is recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income.
Revenue Recognition-Sales- Sales of products are recorded (i) upon shipment if title passes to the customer upon shipment, or upon delivery if title passes to the customer upon delivery, (ii) when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists with the customer, (iii) when the sales price is fixed and determinable, and (iv) when the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs are included in sales.
WABCO typically records cooperative advertising allowances, rebates and other forms of sales incentives as a reduction of sales at the later of the date of the sale or the date the incentive is offered. For these costs, WABCO recorded $36.642.4 million, $43.036.6 million and $33.943.0 million in 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
In most countries where WABCO operates, sales are subject to VAT taxes. Sales are presented net of VAT in the consolidated statements of income.
Shipping and Handling Costs-Shipping,- Shipping, handling, receiving, inspecting, warehousing, internal transfer, procurement and other costs of distribution are included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of income.
Cash and Cash Equivalents-Cash- Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company classifies cash and cash equivalents that are restricted from operating use for the next twelve months as restricted cash. Amounts restricted for longer than twelve months are classified as other assets. When restrictions are no longer in place, the amounts are reclassified to cash and cash equivalents.
Short-term Investments - Short-term investments consist of a deposit fund holding primarily term deposits, certificates of deposit and short-term bonds. The investments are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded in the consolidated financial statements at market value with changes in market value included in other comprehensive income. The fair value of the investments is determined based on readily available pricing sources for identical instruments in less active markets (Level 2). In the event the investments experience an other-than-temporary impairment in value, such impairment is recognized as a loss in the consolidated statement of operations. The market value of the Company's investments approximated the carrying cost of $55.2 million as of December 31, 2013 with no impairment recognized in 2013.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts- The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on its customers. In determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, on a monthly basis, WABCO analyzes the aging of accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, availability of credit insurance and current economic trends.
Transfers of Financial Instruments-Instruments - The Company accounts for sales and transfers of financial instruments under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 860.ASC 860 "Transfers and Servicing". ASC 860 states that a transfer of financial assets (either all or a portion of a financial asset) in which the transferor surrenders control over those financial assets shall be accounted for as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred assets is received in exchange. The Company sells receivables to the bank which qualify as financial assets since they are associated with the sale of products by the subsidiaries of the Company and accepted by the Company's customers in the ordinary course of business. For all receivables sold to the bank, the risks of collection of such receivables reside with the bank. Therefore, upon sale of the receivables to the bank, the appropriate reversal of any applicable accounts receivable allowances are recorded by the Company.
Inventory Reserves-Inventory costs are determined by the use of the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, and are stated at the lower of such cost or realizable value. The LIFO method is used as it provides a better matching of the costs to the sales. Inventories are categorized as finished products, products-in-process and raw materials. On a quarterly basis, the companyCompany tests its inventory for slow moving and obsolete stock by considering both the historical and expected sales and the Company will record a provision, if needed.
Property, Plant & Equipment-Property,- Property, plant and equipment balances, including tooling, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. WABCO capitalizes costs, including interest during construction of fixed asset additions, improvements, and betterments that add to productive capacity or extend the asset life. WABCO assesses facilities for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation-Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of the asset or asset group, which are 40 years for buildings, 3 to 5 years for tooling and 5 to 15 years for machinery and equipment.
Computer Software Costs-WABCO- WABCO capitalizes the costs of obtaining or developing internal-use computer software, including directly related payroll costs. WABCOThe Company amortizes those costs on a straight-line basis over periods of up to seven
years, beginning when the software is ready for its intended use. WABCOThe Company assesses capitalized software costs for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.
Goodwill-The- The Company has a significant amount of goodwill on its balance sheet that is not amortized, but subject to impairment tests each fiscal year on October 1st or more often when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company's impairment tests utilize the two-step approach. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value
of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The recoverability of goodwill is measured based on one reporting unit for the total Company. WABCO'sOur plants, engineering, technical support, distribution centers and other support functions are shared among various product families and serve all distribution channels with many customers. Based on the organizational structure, as well as the nature of financial information available and reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions about resource allocations, the Company has concluded that its total WABCO operations represent one reportable segment and that WABCO's performance and future net cash flow perspectives are best understood and assessed as such. In order to approximate the fair value of the reporting unit for purposes of testing recoverability, we use the total market capitalization of the Company, a market approach, which is then compared to the total book value of the Company. In the event the Company's fair value has fallen below book value, the Company will compare the estimated fair value of goodwill to its book value. If the book value of goodwill exceeds the estimated fair value of goodwill, the Company will recognize the difference as an impairment loss in operating income. There has been no impairment of goodwill during 2012.2013.
Other Intangible Assets with Determinable Lives-Other- Other intangible assets with determinable lives consist of customer and distribution relationships, patented and unpatented technology, in-process research and development, and other intangibles and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 1 to 15 years. WABCO assesses intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.
Debt Issuance CostsWarranties -The costs related to the issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related debt. The Company has a balance of $2.3 million related to deferred financing costs included in other assets as of December 31, 2012. A total of $0.5 million was amortized during the year ended December 31, 2012 and included in selling and administrative expenses.
Warranties-Products- Products sold by WABCO are covered by a basic limited warranty with terms and conditions that vary depending upon the product and country in which it was sold. The limited warranty covers the equipment, parts and labor (in certain cases) necessary to satisfy the warranty obligation generally for a period of two years. Estimated product warranty expenses are accrued in cost of sales at the time the related sale is recognized. Estimates of warranty expenses are based primarily on warranty claims experience and specific customer contracts. Warranty expenses include accruals for basic warranties for product sold, as well as accruals for product recalls, service campaigns and other related events when they are known and estimable. To the extent WABCO experiences changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims, its warranty accrual is adjusted accordingly. Warranty accrual estimates are updated based upon the most current warranty claims information available. The Company's warranty costs as a percentage of sales totaled 0.8% in 2013, 1.1% in 20121.5% in 2011 and 1.5% in 2010.2011. See Note 1314 for a summary of warranties.
Post-retirement Benefits-All- All post-retirement benefits are accounted for on an accrual basis using actuarial assumptions. Post-retirement pension benefits are provided for substantially all employees of WABCO, both in the U.S.the United States and abroad through plans specific to each of WABCO's legal entities. In addition, in the U.S.,United States, certain employees receive post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits. The impact of Health Care Reform legislation in the U.S.United States is immaterial to the Company. The costs of the benefits provided through plans of WABCO are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and summarized in detail along with other information pertaining to these plans in Note 11.12. Plans are primarily concentrated in the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland.
WABCO is also required to measure a defined benefit post-retirement plan's assets and obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer's fiscal year, and recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit post-retirement plan in comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments-Financial- Financial instruments consist mainly of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and loans payable to banks. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the carrying amounts of these instruments approximated their fair values. At December 31, 2011,2013, long-term debt also approximated fair value.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-The- The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments which qualify for hedge accounting are recorded as an offset to the changes in fair value of the underlying hedged item and are included in the
account other non-operating expense, net or other operating expense, net. See Note 19 for further details on derivative instruments.
Research, Development and Engineering Expenses-Research- Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. WABCO expended approximately $104.3$119.4 million in 2013, $104.3 million in 2012 $105.1and $105.1 million in 2011 and $85.9 million in 2010 for research activities, product development and for product engineering.
Income Taxes-Deferred- Deferred income taxes are determined on the liability method, and are recognized for all temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. No provision is made for U.S. income taxes applicable to undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries except Brazil, that are indefinitely reinvested.permanently reinvested, except for Brazil's current year earnings and $300.0 million of unremitted foreign earnings related to a Belgian affiliate resulting from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine.
A tax position is a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax filing that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%) based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Tax positions are not permitted to be recognized, derecognized, or remeasured due to changes subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Rather, these changes are recorded in the period the change occurs with appropriate disclosure of such subsequent events, if significant.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We calculated this valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740 “Income“Income Taxes,” which requires an assessment of both positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets, when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to decrease the net deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to increase the net deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Earnings Per Share-Share - Basic net income / (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted average number of WABCO common shares outstanding. The average number of outstanding shares of common stock used in computing diluted net income / (loss) per share includes weighted average incremental shares when the impact is not anti-dilutive. The weighted average incremental shares represent the net amount of shares the Company would issue upon the assumed exercise of in-the-money stock options and vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”)(RSUs) after assuming that the Company would use the proceeds from the exercise of options to repurchase treasury stock.
Anti-dilutive optionsshares, if applicable, are excluded and represent those options and RSUs whose exercise price wasassumed proceeds were greater than the average price of the Company's common stock. The average number of outstanding shares of common stock used in computing diluted net income / (loss) per share included no weighted average incremental shares for the year ended December 31, 2010 since the impact would be anti-dilutive.
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
| Weighted average incremental shares included | 1,416,397 |
| 2,136,376 |
| — |
| 908,071 |
| 1,416,397 |
| 2,136,376 |
|
| Shares excluded due to anti-dilutive effect | 480,756 |
| 205,321 |
| — |
| 3,000 |
| 480,756 |
| 205,321 |
|
Comprehensive Income / (Loss)-Comprehensive- Comprehensive income / (loss) consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, pension liability adjustments and unrecognized gains or losses on post-retirement benefit plans and is presented in the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders' equity and comprehensive income.
Stock-Based Compensation-WABCO- WABCO measures and recognizes in its combinedconsolidated statement of incomeoperations the expense associated with all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including stock options, restricted stock unitsRSUs, PSUs and restricted stock grants based on estimated fair values.
All options granted prior to 2007 were adjusted upon the Distribution into two separate options, one relating to the Company's common stock and one relating to Trane common stock. This adjustment was made such that immediately
following the Distribution (i) the number of shares relating to the Company options were equal to the number of shares of Company common stock that the option holder would have received in the Distribution had Trane options represented outstanding shares of Trane common stock, and (ii) the per share option exercise price of the original Trane stock option was
proportionally allocated between the two types of stock options based upon the relative per share trading prices of the Company and Trane immediately following the Distribution. Thus, upon the Distribution, WABCO options are being held by both WABCO and Trane employees and Trane options continued to be held by WABCO employees. Options granted to WABCO employees in 2007 were equitably adjusted upon Distribution so as to relate solely to shares of the Company's common stock. These adjustments preserved the economic value of the awards immediately prior to the Distribution. All Company options issued as part of this adjustment and the Trane options are fully vested at this time. Further, for purposes of vesting and the post-termination exercise periods applicable to such stock options, the Trane Inc. Management Development and Compensation Committee determined that continued employment with the Company will be viewed as continued employment with the issuer of the options.
WABCO uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to measure the amount of compensation expense to be recognized for each option award. Outstanding WABCO options held by non-WABCO employees or directors arose as a result of the Distribution and are not reflected in compensation expense recognized by the Company. Consequently, these stock options do not result in any tax benefits to the Company at any time. The WABCO options held by non-employees or directors are considered in the Company's diluted EPS calculation.
| |
| NOTE 3. | Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
The adoption of recently issued accounting standards did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, nor do we expect the pending adoption of recently issued accounting standards to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In 2011,July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-5,(ASU) 2013-11 Presentation of Comprehensive Incomean Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, ("whichprovides guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU 2011-5") and ASU 2011-12 Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05 ("ASU 2011-12").
ASU 2011-5 improves the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and increases the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-52013-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. As ASU 2011-5 relates specifically to presentation and disclosures the2013. We do not expect any material impact from adoption of these provisions did not have any other impactthis guidance on ourthe consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02 Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 aims to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The main purposeentities are required to report the effect of ASU 2011-12 was to defer the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustmentssignificant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05, therefore it did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.respective line items in net income. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2013-02 as of March 31, 2013.
| |
| NOTE 4. | Streamlining Expenses |
The Company classifies employee-related streamlining charges as either a one-time benefit arrangement or an ongoing benefit arrangement as appropriate. The companyCompany accounts for employee related terminations as streamlining when the position is not being replaced. From time to time the Company also has streamlining charges that are not related to employees, such as facility exit costs.
Based on market declines occurring in the fourth quarter of 2008, we commenced a streamlining program on October 28, 2008 (the “2008/2008/2009 Program”)Program), which began with a consultative process with works councils and employee representatives globally. The 2008/2009 Program reduced our global workforce by approximately 1,800 employees. This level of reduction in workforce brought our capacity in line with market demand, while still allowing us to continue our focus on core strategies, including technology, new products, globalization, and quality and productivity initiatives. We believe the completion of these actions created sufficient flexibility in production and helped us to cope with anticipated demand volatility. The Company does not expect to incur any further charges on the 2008/2009 Program.
Based on the Company’s efforts to maintain our global footprint, the Company will periodically enter into other streamlining programs as deemed necessary (“Other Programs”)(Other Programs). No ongoing individual program is assessed as material, and the Company does not expect to incur significant additional charges for ongoing programs as of December 31, 20122013.
The following is a summary of changes in the Company’s streamlining program liabilities for the year ended December 31, 20122013 (amounts in millions). Activity for the period consisted of termination payments and employee-related charges.
|
| | | |
| 2008 / 2009 Program | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 17.5 |
|
| Charges during 2012 | — |
|
| Payments during 2012 | (7.3 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 10.2 |
|
| Other Programs | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 2.3 |
|
| Charges during 2012 | 12.9 |
|
| Payments during 2012 | (5.3 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 9.9 |
|
| Total foreign exchange translation effects | $ | 0.3 |
|
| Total streamlining liability as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 20.4 |
|
|
| | | |
| 2008 / 2009 Program | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 10.2 |
|
| Charges during 2013 | — |
|
| Payments during 2013 | (4.3 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 5.9 |
|
| Other Programs | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 9.9 |
|
| Charges during 2013 | 17.9 |
|
| Payments during 2013 | (8.8 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 19.0 |
|
| Total foreign exchange translation effects | $ | 1.2 |
|
| Total streamlining liability as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 26.1 |
|
A balance of $10.913.5 million is included in other liabilities (non-current) and $9.512.6 million is included in other accrued liabilities (current) as of December 31, 20122013.
The following is a summary of current and cumulative streamlining costs (including employee-related costs shown above as well as asset write-offs and other charges).
| | | | | Charges for Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Cumulative Charges as of December 31, 2012 | | Charges for Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Cumulative Charges as of December 31, 2013 |
| | | 2008/2009 Program | | Other Programs | | 2008/2009 Program | | Other Programs | | 2008/2009 Program | | Other Programs | | 2008/2009 Program | | Other Programs |
| Employee-related charges – cost of sales | | $ | — |
| | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | 45.7 |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 45.7 |
| | $ | 16.6 |
|
| Employee-related charges – selling and administrative | | — |
| | 7.5 |
| | 45.8 |
| | 9.5 |
| | — |
| | 10.5 |
| | 45.8 |
| | 20.0 |
|
| Total employee related charges | | — |
|
| 12.7 |
| | 91.5 |
| | 19.5 |
| | — |
|
| 17.1 |
| | 91.5 |
| | 36.6 |
|
| Asset write-offs | | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 1.0 |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Total program costs | | $ | — |
| | $ | 12.9 |
| | $ | 91.5 |
| | $ | 20.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17.9 |
| | $ | 91.5 |
| | $ | 38.4 |
|
The following is a summary of net shares outstanding and shares issued or reacquired during the years ending December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares of Common Stock |
| | Total Shares | | Treasury Shares | | Net Shares Outstanding |
| Balance, December 31, 2009 | 70,034,252 |
| | (5,956,806 | ) | | 64,077,446 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 2,231,178 |
| | — |
| | 2,231,178 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 149,985 |
| | — |
| | 149,985 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2010 | 72,415,415 |
| | (5,956,806 | ) | | 66,458,609 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 1,630,838 |
| | — |
| | 1,630,838 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 196,677 |
| | — |
| | 196,677 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | (3,520,469 | ) | | (3,520,469 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2011 | 74,242,930 |
| | (9,477,275 | ) | | 64,765,655 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 1,312,288 |
| | — |
| | 1,312,288 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 200,088 |
| | — |
| | 200,088 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | (3,530,880 | ) | | (3,530,880 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | 75,755,306 |
| | (13,008,155 | ) | | 62,747,151 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares of Common Stock |
| | Total Shares | | Treasury Shares | | Net Shares Outstanding |
| Balance, December 31, 2010 | 72,415,415 |
| | (5,956,806 | ) | | 66,458,609 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 1,630,838 |
| | — |
| | 1,630,838 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 196,677 |
| | — |
| | 196,677 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | (3,520,469 | ) | | (3,520,469 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2011 | 74,242,930 |
| | (9,477,275 | ) | | 64,765,655 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 1,312,288 |
| | — |
| | 1,312,288 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 200,088 |
| | — |
| | 200,088 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | (3,530,880 | ) | | (3,530,880 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | 75,755,306 |
| | (13,008,155 | ) | | 62,747,151 |
|
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options | 1,600,850 |
| | — |
| | 1,600,850 |
|
| Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs | 115,018 |
| | — |
| | 115,018 |
|
| Shares purchased for treasury | — |
| | (3,103,994 | ) | | (3,103,994 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2013 | 77,471,174 |
| | (16,112,149 | ) | | 61,359,025 |
|
The Company accounts for purchases of treasury stock under the cost method with the costs of such share purchases reflected in treasury stock in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. When treasury shares are reissued, they are recorded at the average cost of the treasury shares acquired since the inception of the share buy back programs, net of shares previously reissued and the Company reflects the difference between the average cost paid and the amount received for the reissued shares in capital surplus. As of December 31, 20122013, no shares have been reissued.
The Company'sOn May 26, 2011, the Board of Directors has approved a program to purchaserepurchase shares of the Company's common stock. The authorization by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2011 approved the purchase of sharesstock in an amount not to exceed $400.0400 million, which expiresexpired on May 31, 2013. Additionally onOn October 26, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into an additional share repurchase program. This board authorization allowsprogram for the repurchase of a further $400.0400 million of common shares. An additional repurchase program for $200.0 million of common shares atwas further authorized on October 29, 2013 as a result of the discretionreceipt of management for a period untilan exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company's appeal of the EC fine. Both of these authorizations expire on December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 20122013, the Company had repurchased a total of $379.4620.3 million of shares under these three repurchase programs, leaving an unexpended balance of $420.6379.7 million available to repurchase shares in the future. Between January 1, 20132014 and February 13, 2013,2014, the Company has repurchased an additional 88,70093,164 shares for a total of $5.88.5 million. The Company plans to continue to purchaserepurchase shares at prevailing market prices. TimingThe timing and amount of share repurchases, if any, will vary dependingdepend on a variety of factors including, among other things, share price, market conditions and other factors.applicable regulatory requirements.
| |
| NOTE 6. | Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the Company to issue up to 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share and 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
The Company paid no dividends on our common stock in 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.
The WABCO Holdings Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “20072007 Omnibus Plan”)Plan), was formally adopted by our Board of Directors prior to the Distribution. The 2007 Omnibus Plan was replaced in May 2009 by the WABCO Holdings Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “20092009 Omnibus Plan”) which wasPlan), and further amended in May 2013 (the 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan) as approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The 2009 Restated Omnibus plan is intended to promote our long-term financial success and increase shareholder value by providing us with thegreater flexibility to implement the optimal mix of annual and long-term cash, equity and equity-based incentives. The 2009 Omnibus PlanIt is also intended to align the interests of our employees with the interests of our shareholders by affording them certain opportunities to acquire an interest in our stock. We believe that these incentives and opportunities will encourage our executives and other key employees to continue in our employment, by providing them with a competitive level of compensation that varies based on our performance.
Under the 2009 Omnibus Plan and 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan, the Company may issue the following types of awards: stock options, stock appreciation rights (sometimes referred to as SARs), restricted stock units, performance stock units, restricted shares, annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards. The maximum number of shares or units that may be issued under the 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan is 5,100,000. No participant shall be granted stock options, stock appreciation rights, or both with respect to more than 750,000 shares during any calendar year. No individual shall be granted restricted shares or restricted stock units, with respect to 200,000 shares or units as the case may be during any calendar year. If an award under either the 2007 Omnibus Plan, the 2009 Omnibus Plan or the 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or, with respect to full-value incentive awards, is forfeited to or repurchased by the Company, the unpurchased shares will become available for future grant or sale under the 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan.
At December 31, 20122013, options to purchase a total of 3,233,9231,596,690 shares,stock options, RSUs and restricted sharesPSUs were outstanding and there were 4,037,4773,922,565 shares remaining available for grant under the 2009 Restated Omnibus Plan.
Commencing in 2013, the Company has replaced the stock options component of the equity incentive awards with PSUs, the vesting of which would occur at levels ranging from none to 200% of the number of granted PSUs depending upon the achievement of three-year cumulative earnings per share goals approved by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. The Company assesses the expected achievement levels at the end of each reporting period. As of December 31, 2013, the Company believes it is probable that the performance condition will be met and has accrued for the compensation expense accordingly.
The Company records stock-based compensation based on the estimated fair value of the award at the grant date and is recognized as an expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income over the requisite service period. Total stock-based compensation cost recognized during the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 were as follows:follows (amounts in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| Stock-based compensation (before tax effects) | $ | 14.3 |
| | $ | 13.7 |
| | $ | 13.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Stock-based compensation (before tax effects) | $ | 13.6 |
| | $ | 14.3 |
| | $ | 13.7 |
|
The total number and type of awards granted during the periods presented and the related weighted-average grant-date fair values were as follows:
| | | | Shares underlying options | | Weighted - Average Exercise Price | | Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares underlying options | | Weighted - Average Exercise Price | | Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value |
| | WABCO employees | | Trane employees | | Total | | WABCO employees | | Trane employees | | Total | |
| Options Outstanding December 31, 2009 | 4,495,532 |
| | 2,771,001 |
| | 7,266,533 |
| | $ | 23.78 |
| | | |
| Options Granted | 564,848 |
| | — |
| | 564,848 |
| | $ | 27.49 |
| | $ | 9.80 |
| |
| Options Exercised | (859,444 | ) | | (1,371,734 | ) | | (2,231,178 | ) | | $ | 18.75 |
| | | |
| Options Forfeited | (124,179 | ) | | (134,234 | ) | | (258,413 | ) | | $ | 29.33 |
| | | |
| Options Outstanding December 31, 2010 | 4,076,757 |
| | 1,265,033 |
| | 5,341,790 |
| | $ | 26.02 |
| | | 4,076,757 |
| | 1,265,033 |
| | 5,341,790 |
| | $ | 26.02 |
| | |
| Options Granted | 276,287 |
| | — |
| | 276,287 |
| | $ | 59.24 |
| | $ | 22.94 |
| 276,287 |
| | — |
| | 276,287 |
| | $ | 59.24 |
| | $ | 22.94 |
|
| Options Exercised | (1,228,475 | ) | | (403,731 | ) | | (1,632,206 | ) | | $ | 22.52 |
| | | (1,228,475 | ) | | (403,731 | ) | | (1,632,206 | ) | | $ | 22.52 |
| | |
| Options Forfeited | (34,329 | ) | | (8,865 | ) | | (43,194 | ) | | $ | 34.12 |
| | | (34,329 | ) | | (8,865 | ) | | (43,194 | ) | | $ | 34.12 |
| | |
| Options Outstanding December 31, 2011 | 3,090,240 |
| | 852,437 |
| | 3,942,677 |
| | $ | 29.61 |
| | | 3,090,240 |
| | 852,437 |
| | 3,942,677 |
| | $ | 29.61 |
| | |
| Options Granted | 284,691 |
| | — |
| | 284,691 |
| | $ | 58.71 |
| | $ | 23.10 |
| 284,691 |
| | — |
| | 284,691 |
| | $ | 58.71 |
| | $ | 23.10 |
|
| Options Exercised | (1,037,538 | ) | | (279,205 | ) | | (1,316,743 | ) | | $ | 21.90 |
| | | (1,037,538 | ) | | (279,205 | ) | | (1,316,743 | ) | | $ | 21.90 |
| | |
| Options Forfeited | (37,260 | ) | | (5,173 | ) | | (42,433 | ) | | $ | 40.74 |
| | | (37,260 | ) | | (5,173 | ) | | (42,433 | ) | | $ | 40.74 |
| | |
| Options Outstanding December 31, 2012 | 2,300,133 |
| | 568,059 |
| | 2,868,192 |
| | $ | 35.82 |
| | | 2,300,133 |
| | 568,059 |
| | 2,868,192 |
| | $ | 35.82 |
| | |
| Options Granted | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Options Exercised | | (1,359,825 | ) | | (242,243 | ) | | (1,602,068 | ) | | $ | 31.08 |
| | |
| Options Forfeited | | (53,391 | ) | | (200 | ) | | (53,591 | ) | | $ | 52.71 |
| | |
| Options Outstanding December 31, 2013 | | 886,917 |
| | 325,616 |
| | 1,212,533 |
| | $ | 41.20 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2012 | 1,573,314 |
| | 568,059 |
| | 2,141,373 |
| | $ | 33.06 |
| | | |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | 630,570 |
| | 325,616 |
| | 956,186 |
| | $ | 37.30 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| RSUs Outstanding December 31, 2009 | 503,729 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| RSUs Granted | 235,201 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 25.81 |
| |
| RSUs Vested | (190,706 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 22.07 |
| |
| RSUs Forfeited | (24,831 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 18.54 |
| |
| RSUs Outstanding December 31, 2010 | 523,393 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 19.93 |
| 523,393 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 19.93 |
|
| RSUs Granted | 220,181 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 62.44 |
| 220,181 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 62.44 |
|
| RSUs Vested | (245,035 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 19.87 |
| (245,035 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 19.87 |
|
| RSUs Forfeited | (13,695 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 37.55 |
| (13,695 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 37.55 |
|
| RSUs Outstanding December 31, 2011 | 484,844 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 38.80 |
| 484,844 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 38.80 |
|
| RSUs Granted | 133,804 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 58.47 |
| 133,804 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 58.47 |
|
| RSUs Vested | (232,980 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 23.14 |
| (232,980 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 23.14 |
|
| RSUs Forfeited | (19,937 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 53.63 |
| (19,937 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 53.63 |
|
| RSUs Outstanding December 31, 2012 | 365,731 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 55.08 |
| 365,731 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 55.08 |
|
| RSUs Granted | | 119,728 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 68.72 |
|
| RSUs Vested | | (138,005 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 44.34 |
|
| RSUs Forfeited | | (47,707 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 60.86 |
|
| RSUs Outstanding December 31, 2013 | | 299,747 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 64.79 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PSUs Granted | | 94,364 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 68.10 |
|
| PSUs Forfeited | | (9,954 | ) | | | | | | | | $ | 68.10 |
|
| PSUs Outstanding December 31, 2013 | | 84,410 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 68.10 |
|
There were no stock options granted in 2013. In 2012, and 2011, a total of 284,691 and 276,287options were granted, respectively, of which all are exercisable in equal installments over a period of three years.
three years. In 20112013, a total of 276,287119,728 options were granted of which all are exercisable in equal installments over a period of three years. In 2010, a total of 564,848 optionsRSUs were granted of which 564,848109,254 are exercisablevest in equal annual installments over a period of three years. Of the remaining three10,474 RSUs granted in 2013, 6,764 vest immediately and 3,710 vest after three years. In 2012,, a total of 133,804 RSUs were granted of which 103,581 vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years. Of the remaining 30,223 RSUs granted in 2012, years, 11,023 vest immediately, 6,454 vest after two years and 12,746 vest after three years. In 2011, a total of 220,181 RSUs were granted of which 101,647 vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years. Of the remaining 118,534 RSUs granted in 2011, years, 3,973 vest after two years, and 41,064 vest after three years and 73,497 vest after four years.
In four2013 years. In 2010,, a total of 235,20194,364 RSUsPSUs were granted, the vesting of which would occur, if at all, and at levels depending upon, the achievement of certain three-year cumulative earnings per share goals.
225,523 vest in equal annual installments over a periodAs of threeDecember 31, 2013 years. Of, the remaining 9,678 RSUs granted in 2010, 6,635 vest after two years and 3,318 vest after three years.
The total aggregate intrinsic value of stock option awards outstanding as ofwas December 31, 2012 is $84.261.3 million. The total aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable as of December 31, 2012 is $68.8 million. The total aggregate intrinsic value ofand options outstanding, less expected forfeitures, as of the same date was December 31, 2012$52.3 million is $and 84.1$61.2 million., respectively. Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated by subtracting the exercise price of the option from the closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 20122013, multiplied by the number of shares per each option. In addition,
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $69.9 million, $49.9 million and $68.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Total fair value of shares vested was $9.5 million, $14.2 million and $13.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively. The 615,371 of unvested options, RSUs and PSUs as of December 31, 2013 will result in the recognition of $19.8 million of compensation cost to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
The contractual life of all options is 10.0 years. The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as of December 31, 20122013 iswas 5.54.7 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $49.9 million, $68.9 million and $66.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively. Total fair value of shares
vested was $14.2 million, $13.2 million and $11.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively. The 1,081,015 of nonvested options and RSUs as of December 31, 2012 will result in the recognition of $18.1 million of compensation cost. This cost will be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.9 years. The weighted average remaining contractual lifeyears, while that of the vested options as of December 31, 2012 is 4.7 years. The contractual life of all options is 10.0was 4.0 years. The tax benefit from stock options exercised during the yearsperiod was $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011 was immaterial.immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The weighted average grant date fair value was calculated under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following table summarizes the significant assumptions used for the grants during the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 2010:2011:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| Assumption | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.81 | % | | 2.30 | % | | 2.39 | % | N/A | | 0.81 | % | | 2.30 | % |
| Expected volatility | 44.48 | % | | 42.82 | % | | 40.96 | % | N/A | | 44.48 | % | | 42.82 | % |
| Expected holding period | 5 Years |
| | 5 Years |
| | 5 Years |
| N/A | | 5 years |
| | 5 years |
|
| Expected dividend yield | — | % | | 0.47 | % | | 1.02 | % | N/A | | — | % | | 0.47 | % |
The risk free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury securities that correspond to the expected holding period of the options. WABCO reviewed the historic volatility of its common stock over a four-year period, the common stock of its peer group over a five-year period, and the implied volatility for at the money options to purchase shares of its common stock. The five-year historical volatility period was selected since that period corresponds with the expected holding period. Based on this data, the Company chose to use a weighted average of the implied volatility of WABCO, the most recent four-year historical volatility of WABCO and the median most recent three-year historical volatility of WABCO’s peer group prior to the spin-off date. The expected holding period was calculated by reviewing the historical exercise pattern of all holders that were granted options and the exercise behavior of officers versus non-officers. The results of the analysis support one expected holding period for all groups of employees. The dividend yield was based on an expected future dividend amount for the period at the time of grant. Commencing in 2013, the Company will replace stock options with performance share units (PSUs), the vesting of which would occur, if at all, and at levels depending upon, the achievement of three-year cumulative performance earnings per share goals approved by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors.
| |
| NOTE 7. | Other Operating and Non-Operating Expense / (Income), Net |
Other expense / expense/(income) was as follows:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Operating: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank charges | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
|
| Miscellaneous taxes | 2.4 |
| | 1.8 |
| | — |
| 2.9 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Other (income)/expense, net | (0.7 | ) | | 2.3 |
| | 3.7 |
| |
| Other expense/(income), net | | 0.1 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | 2.3 |
|
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 5.8 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 5.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-operating: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax indemnification liabilities | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| |
| Indemnification settlements, net | | $ | (8.8 | ) | | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | (22.8 | ) |
| Receivable discount fees | 1.1 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 1.6 |
| 1.0 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| Losses on accounts receivable securitization program | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Foreign exchange loss/(gain) | 0.8 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| |
| Other (income)/expense, net | (0.3 | ) | | 0.9 |
| | (0.4 | ) | |
| Foreign exchange (gain)/loss | | (2.3 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Other expense/(income), net | | 3.2 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 0.9 |
|
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
| $ | (6.9 | ) | | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | (20.2 | ) |
The components of inventories, which are carried on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis, are as follows:
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | (Amounts in millions) | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Finished products | Finished products | $ | 76.9 |
| | $ | 82.4 |
| Finished products | $ | 93.9 |
| | $ | 76.9 |
|
| Products in process | Products in process | 7.1 |
| | 8.6 |
| Products in process | 7.2 |
| | 7.1 |
|
| Raw materials | Raw materials | 107.8 |
| | 107.0 |
| Raw materials | 106.1 |
| | 107.8 |
|
| Inventories at cost | Inventories at cost | $ | 191.8 |
| | $ | 198.0 |
| Inventories at cost | $ | 207.2 |
| | $ | 191.8 |
|
The current replacement cost approximated the LIFO carrying cost for 20122013 and 2011.2012. Inventory allowance reservereserves amounted to $14.4$17.2 million and $15.2 million14.4 inmillion for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and December 31, 20112012, respectively.
| |
| NOTE 9. | FacilitiesProperty, Plant and Equipment |
The components of facilities,property, plant and equipment, at cost, are as follows:follow:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Land | $ | 22.3 |
| | $ | 18.3 |
| $ | 23.8 |
| | $ | 22.3 |
|
| Buildings | 164.1 |
| | 153.0 |
| 178.7 |
| | 164.1 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 618.3 |
| | 557.4 |
| 659.0 |
| | 618.3 |
|
| Improvements in progress | 25.7 |
| | 37.8 |
| 39.2 |
| | 25.7 |
|
| Gross facilities | 830.4 |
| | 766.5 |
| |
| Gross property, plant and equipment | | 900.7 |
| | 830.4 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation | 441.4 |
| | 409.1 |
| 478.2 |
| | 441.4 |
|
| Net facilities | $ | 389.0 |
| | $ | 357.4 |
| |
| Net property, plant and equipment | | $ | 422.5 |
| | $ | 389.0 |
|
Depreciation expense for owned assets, including those under capital leases, for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 was $74.6 million, $65.6 million, and $66.4 million and $66.3 million, respectively.
MachineryNet property, plant and equipment includes tooling investments which amounted to $74.5of $80.6 million and $63.9$74.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and 2011 respectively.
| |
| NOTE 10. | Accounts Receivable Securitization Program & Financing Receivables |
On September 23, 2009, the Company established an accounts receivable securitization program (the “AccountsAccounts Receivable Securitization Program”)Program) with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. The maximum funding from receivables that may be sold into the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program and outstanding at any point in time is €80 million, following the voluntary reduction in January 2013 of the program from €100 million to €80 million; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient eligible receivables to access the maximum availability. The original term of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program was for one year, with the possibility of four additional annual extensions, assuming the Company and the participating sellers are in compliance with the applicable covenants. The Company extended the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program in September 20122013 for one additional year.
During the year ended December 31, 20122013, the Company sold all of its eligible receivables into the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program. In addition to the above, the Company has the ability to access cash on a daily basis related to collections on sold receivables prior to the following settlement date with the bank.
The sold receivables were removed from the balance sheet in accordance with the guidance under ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing.860. The total amount of receivables sold under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program duringfor the year ended December 31, 20122013 was €731.7790.8 million ($941.11,050.6 million at weighted average 20122013 exchange rates), compared to €816.8€731.7 million ($1,136.8 ($941.1 million at weighted average December 31, 20112012 exchange rates) duringfor the year ended December 31, 20112012 and €578€816.8 million ($756 ($1,136.8 million at weighted average 20102011 exchange rates) duringfor the year ended December 31, 2010.2011. The amount of eligible receivables sold and outstanding at December 31, 2012 amounted to €67.4 million ($89.1 million at December 31, 2012 exchange rates) compared to €76.6 million ($99.3 million at December 31, 2011 exchanged rates) at year ended December 31, 2011.
outstanding at December 31, 2013 amounted to €75.0 million ($103.6 million at December 31, 2013 exchange rates) compared to €67.4 million ($89.1 million at December 31, 2012 exchange rates) at December 31, 2012.
As a result of the sale, accounts receivable decreased by $89.1103.6 million and cash and cash equivalents increased by $51.751.5 million in 2012,2013, compared to $89.1 million and $51.7 million, respectively, $99.3 million and $52.5 millionin 2011.2012. The remaining amount of proceeds of $37.452.1 million is a subordinated deposit, before the effect of cash collections, with Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V. at December 31, 20122013, compared to $46.8$37.4 million at December 31, 2011.2012.
As a result of the Company's access to the cash collections of the sold receivables, the companyCompany collected $39.153.9 million of additional cash as of December 31, 20122013, compared to $36.8$39.1 million at December 31, 2011.2012. Of these cash receipts, $27.736.4 million is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as loans payable to bank, compared to $24.4$27.7 million at December 31, 2011 and2012. The remaining balance of $11.417.5 million reduced the subordinated deposit to $26.034.6 million, the balance of which is classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 20122013. The subordinated deposit at December 31, 20112012 stood at $34.4 million.$26.0 million.
Also, as of December 31, 2013, the Company hashad pledged unsold receivables under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program of €9.83.2 million ($12.94.4 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates), compared to €1.8€9.8 million ($2.3 ($12.9 million at December 31, 20112012 exchange rates) in 2011.2012.
The fair value of the receivables sold equaled the carrying cost at time of sale, and no gain or loss was recorded as a result of the sale. The Company estimatedestimates the fair value of sold receivables using Level 3 inputs based on historical and anticipated performance of similar receivables, including historical and anticipated credit losses (if any). As part of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program, the Company continues to service the receivables. The Company sells the receivables at face value, but receives actual funding net of the subordinated deposit account until collections are received from customers for the receivables sold. The Company is exposed to the credit losses of sold receivables up to the amount of its subordinated deposit account at each settlement date. Credit losses for receivables sold and past due amounts outstanding at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 were both immaterial. Servicing fees paid for the program were $0.8 million, $1.4$0.8 million and $1.8$1.4 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 respectively.
On April 15, 2009, the Company entered into a €35 million factoring program, which has a term of five years, in respect to accounts receivable from one of our customers. To date, we have not utilized this facility.
Other financing receivables include sales to reputable State Owned and Public Enterprises in China that are settled through notes receivable which are registered and endorsed to the Company. These notes receivable are fully secured and generally have contractual maturities of six months or less. These guaranteed notes are available to be discounted with banking institutions in China or transferred to suppliers to settle liabilities. The total amount of notes receivable discounted or transferred for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 werewas $42.8 million, $33.3 million, $ and $62.8 million, respectively. There were no expenses for the year ended 62.8 million and $85.3 millionDecember 31, 2013, respectively, resulting in expenses ofcompared to $0.1 million, $0.6 and $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, and 2011, and 2010, respectively, which are included in “Other“other non-operating expense, net.” The fair value of these guaranteed notes receivable is determined based on Level 2 inputs including credit ratings and other criteria observable in the market. The fair value of these notes equal their carrying amounts of $41.251.4 million and $40.041.2 million as of December 31, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, respectively, and are included in “other current assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company monitors the credit quality of these notes through historical lossesboth the drawers of the draft and guarantors on a monthly basis by reviewing various factors such as payment history, level of state involvement in the institution, size, national importance as well as current economic conditions with Chinese banks. As these receivables are guaranteed by banks andin China. Since the Company has not experienced any historical losses nor is the Company expecting future credit losses based on a review of the various credit quality indicators described above, we have not established a loss provision against these receivables as of December 31, 20122013 or December 31, 2011.2012.
| |
| NOTE 11. | Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Balance of goodwill, beginning of year | $ | 363.9 |
| | $ | 378.4 |
| $ | 371.7 |
| | $ | 363.9 |
|
| Acquisitions | 3.6 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 3.6 |
|
| Foreign exchange translation | 4.2 |
| | (14.5 | ) | 9.5 |
| | 4.2 |
|
| Balance of goodwill, end of year | $ | 371.7 |
| | $ | 363.9 |
| $ | 381.2 |
| | $ | 371.7 |
|
The changes in the carrying value of intangible assets for the years ended December 31 are as follows:follow:
| | | | | Capitalized Software | | Other Intangible Assets | | Total | | Capitalized Software | | Other Intangible Assets | | Total |
| Gross intangible assets as of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2009 | | $ | 88.1 |
| | $ | 22.4 |
| | $ | 110.5 |
| |
| Additions | | 8.0 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 8.8 |
| |
| Disposals | | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| | (0.6 | ) | |
| Foreign exchange translation | | (6.3 | ) | | 0.4 |
| | (5.9 | ) | |
| December 31, 2010 | | 89.2 |
| | 23.6 |
| | 112.8 |
| | $ | 89.2 |
| | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 112.8 |
|
| Additions | | 6.9 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 9.0 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 9.0 |
|
| Disposals | | (2.6 | ) | | — |
| | (2.6 | ) | | (2.6 | ) | | — |
| | (2.6 | ) |
| Foreign exchange translation | | (2.6 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (5.5 | ) | | (2.6 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (5.5 | ) |
| December 31, 2011 | | 90.9 |
| | 22.8 |
| | 113.7 |
| | 90.9 |
| | 22.8 |
| | 113.7 |
|
| Additions | | 8.7 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 13.3 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 13.3 |
|
| Disposals | | (4.5 | ) | |
| | (4.5 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | |
| | (4.5 | ) |
| Foreign exchange translation | | 0.4 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | — |
|
| December 31, 2012 | | $ | 95.5 |
| | $ | 27.0 |
| | $ | 122.5 |
| | 95.5 |
| | 27.0 |
| | 122.5 |
|
| Additions | | | 13.5 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 15.7 |
|
| Disposals | | | (1.9 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (2.4 | ) |
| Foreign exchange translation | | | 4.3 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 4.1 |
|
| December 31, 2013 | | | $ | 111.4 |
| | $ | 28.5 |
| | $ | 139.9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated amortization as of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2009 | | $ | (66.1 | ) | | $ | (0.9 | ) | | $ | (67.0 | ) | |
| Amortization expense | | (6.9 | ) | | (4.2 | ) | | (11.1 | ) | |
| Disposals | | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| Foreign exchange translation | | 4.9 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 4.8 |
| |
| December 31, 2010 | | (67.5 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | | (72.7 | ) | | $ | (67.5 | ) | | $ | (5.2 | ) | | $ | (72.7 | ) |
| Amortization expense | | $ | (7.5 | ) | | $ | (2.8 | ) | | $ | (10.3 | ) | | (7.5 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | (10.3 | ) |
| Disposals | | 2.5 |
| | — |
| | 2.5 |
| | 2.5 |
| | — |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Foreign exchange translation | | 2.0 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| December 31, 2011 | | (70.5 | ) | | (7.5 | ) | | (78.0 | ) | | (70.5 | ) | | (7.5 | ) | | (78.0 | ) |
| Amortization expense | | (6.6 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | | $ | (6.6 | ) | | $ | (2.9 | ) | | $ | (9.5 | ) |
| Disposals | | 4.3 |
| |
| | 4.3 |
| | 4.3 |
| |
| | 4.3 |
|
| Foreign exchange translation | | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| December 31, 2012 | | $ | (72.8 | ) | | $ | (10.3 | ) | | $ | (83.1 | ) | | (72.8 | ) | | (10.3 | ) | | (83.1 | ) |
| Amortization expense | | | (7.5 | ) | | (3.1 | ) | | (10.6 | ) |
| Disposals | | | 1.9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| Foreign exchange translation | | | (3.4 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (4.2 | ) |
| December 31, 2013 | | | $ | (81.8 | ) | | $ | (13.8 | ) | | $ | (95.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net intangible assets as of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 | | $ | 22.7 |
| | $ | 16.7 |
| | $ | 39.4 |
| |
| December 31, 2013 | | | $ | 29.6 |
| | $ | 14.7 |
| | $ | 44.3 |
|
The Company willexpects to incur approximately $10 million to $12 million of amortization expense for each of the next three fiscal years.
| |
| NOTE 12. | Post-retirement Benefits |
WABCO employees participate in a number of benefit plans. The plans include a 401(k) savings plan (the “Savings Plan”) for the Company's U.S. salaried and hourly employees, and a pension plan for certain U.S. salaried and hourly employees. The Savings Planwhich is an individual-account defined contribution plan. WABCO employees in certain countries primarilyincluding Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Switzerland, participate in defined benefit plans or retiree medical plans sponsored by local WABCO legal entities.
Further, WABCO has assumed responsibility for certain retiree medical plans in the U.S.United States and a pension plan in Germany relating to former employees of Trane's Bath & Kitchen division.
Benefits under defined benefit pension plans on a worldwide basis are generally based on years of service and either employee'semployee compensation during the last years of employment or negotiated benefit levels.
WABCO recognizes in its statement of financial position anconsolidated balance sheetsan asset for a defined benefit post-retirement plan's overfunded status or a liability for a plan's underfunded status. The significant long-term liability of $430.6438.6 million on the consolidated balance sheet is primarily due to the underfunded plan in Germany, where the majority of the Company's prior and current employees are based.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in pension and retirement health and life insurance benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the years ending December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and a statement of the funded status as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:
| | | | 2012 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2012 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits | | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits | | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits |
| Reconciliation of benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Obligation at beginning of year | $ | 15.2 |
| | $ | 487.7 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
| | $ | 481.6 |
| $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 585.4 |
| | $ | 15.2 |
| | $ | 487.7 |
|
| Service cost | 0.1 |
| | 9.1 |
| | — |
| | 8.6 |
| 0.1 |
| | 12.7 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 9.1 |
|
| Interest cost | 0.6 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 24.4 |
| 0.5 |
| | 20.8 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 22.3 |
|
| Participant contributions | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| 0.4 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Plan amendments | — |
| | (4.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4.5 | ) |
| Actuarial loss / (gain) | 1.0 |
| | 83.8 |
| | (1.0 | ) | | 12.9 |
| — |
| | (7.7 | ) | | 1.0 |
| | 83.8 |
|
| Benefit payments | (2.2 | ) | | (27.9 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | | (29.4 | ) | (2.0 | ) | | (28.4 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (27.9 | ) |
| Foreign exchange effects | — |
| | 15.2 |
| | — |
| | (10.2 | ) | — |
| | 22.3 |
| | — |
| | 15.2 |
|
| Other | — |
| | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| | (0.5 | ) | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Obligation at end of year | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 585.4 |
| | $ | 15.2 |
| | $ | 487.7 |
| $ | 14.0 |
| | $ | 606.2 |
| | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 585.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2011 |
(Amounts in millions) | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits | | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits |
| Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 154.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 139.5 |
|
| Actual return on assets | — |
| | 12.8 |
| | — |
| | 19.9 |
|
| Employer contributions | 1.9 |
| | 26.4 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 25.8 |
|
| Participant contributions | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Benefit payments | (2.2 | ) | | (27.9 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | | (29.4 | ) |
| Foreign exchange effects | — |
| | 7.2 |
| | — |
| | (0.8 | ) |
| Other expenses | — |
| | (1.3 | ) | | — |
| | (0.7 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 172.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 154.6 |
|
| Funded Status at December 31 | $ | (15.0 | ) | | $ | (413.3 | ) | | $ | (15.2 | ) | | $ | (333.1 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Amounts recognized in the balance sheet: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Noncurrent assets | — |
| | 23.2 |
| | — |
| | 21.4 |
|
| Current liabilities | (1.7 | ) | | (19.2 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | (19.3 | ) |
| Noncurrent liabilities | (13.3 | ) | | (417.3 | ) | | (13.4 | ) | | (335.2 | ) |
| Net amounts recognized in balance sheet: | $ | (15.0 | ) | | $ | (413.3 | ) | | $ | (15.2 | ) | | $ | (333.1 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cumulative amounts recognized in other Comprehensive Income consists of: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Prior service cost | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Net actuarial loss | 7.4 |
| | 148.3 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 65.1 |
|
| Total (before tax effects) | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | 148.4 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
| | $ | 65.2 |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2012 |
(Amounts in millions) | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits | | Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | Pension Benefits |
| Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 172.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 154.6 |
|
| Actual return on assets | — |
| | 3.7 |
| | — |
| | 12.8 |
|
| Employer contributions | 1.6 |
| | 27.4 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 26.4 |
|
| Participant contributions | 0.4 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Benefit payments | (2.0 | ) | | (28.4 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (27.9 | ) |
| Foreign exchange effects | — |
| | 4.0 |
| | — |
| | 7.2 |
|
| Other expenses | — |
| | (0.9 | ) | | — |
| | (1.3 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 178.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 172.1 |
|
| Funded Status at December 31 | $ | (14.0 | ) | | $ | (428.1 | ) | | $ | (15.0 | ) | | $ | (413.3 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Amounts recognized in the balance sheet: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Noncurrent assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 20.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23.2 |
|
| Current liabilities | (1.7 | ) | | (21.9 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (19.2 | ) |
| Noncurrent liabilities | (12.3 | ) | | (426.3 | ) | | (13.3 | ) | | (417.3 | ) |
| Net amounts recognized in balance sheet: | $ | (14.0 | ) | | $ | (428.1 | ) | | $ | (15.0 | ) | | $ | (413.3 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cumulative amounts recognized in other comprehensive income consist of: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Prior service cost | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Net actuarial loss | 7.2 |
| | 147.0 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 148.3 |
|
| Total (before tax effects) | $ | 7.4 |
| | $ | 147.0 |
| | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | 148.4 |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
$6.45.6 million of the amount in other comprehensive income as of December 31, 20122013 is expected to be recognized as post-retirement costs in 2013.2014.
The following table provides a summary of pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of assets as of December 31:
| | | | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 | 2012 |
(Amounts in millions) | Foreign Pension Plans | Foreign Pension Plans |
| For all plans: | | | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 528.1 |
| $ | 448.1 |
| $ | 545.8 |
| $ | 528.1 |
|
| For pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets: | | | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 382.1 |
| $ | 317.7 |
| $ | 390.9 |
| $ | 382.1 |
|
Total post-retirement costs are shown below:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Foreign pensions | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
| | $ | 25.4 |
| $ | 30.9 |
| | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
|
| Health & Life insurance benefits (Americas) | 1.0 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 1.2 |
| 1.0 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| Total post-retirement costs, including accretion expense | $ | 21.2 |
| | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | 26.6 |
| $ | 31.9 |
| | $ | 21.2 |
| | $ | 26.1 |
|
Components of post-retirement costs are broken out in the tables below:
Pension Benefit Costs
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 Pensions | | 2011 Pensions | | 2010 Pensions | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Service cost-benefits earned during period | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 8.6 |
| | $ | 8.5 |
| $ | 12.7 |
| | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 8.6 |
|
| Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 22.3 |
| | 24.4 |
| | 22.9 |
| 20.8 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 24.4 |
|
| Less assumed return on plan assets | (8.6 | ) | | (10.0 | ) | | (7.9 | ) | |
| Less: assumed return on plan assets | | (8.8 | ) | | (8.6 | ) | | (10.0 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service cost | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Amortization of net loss | 1.7 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 1.8 |
| 6.1 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| Plan amendments | (4.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | (4.3 | ) | | — |
|
| Net defined benefit plan cost after amendments | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
| | $ | 25.4 |
| $ | 30.9 |
| | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Costs
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2011 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2010 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Interest and service cost on projected benefit obligation | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
| $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
|
| Amortization of net loss | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Defined benefit plan cost | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost is computed on the straight-line method over the average remaining service period of active participants.
Major assumptions used in determining the benefit obligation and net cost for post-retirement plans are presented below as weighted averages:
| | Benefit Obligation at December 31, | 2012 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2012 Foreign Pension Plans | | 2011 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2011 Foreign Pension Plans | |
| Benefit Obligation at December 31 | | 2013 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2013 Foreign Pension Plans | | 2012 Health & Life Ins. Benefits | | 2012 Foreign Pension Plans |
| Discount rate | 3.25 | % | | 3.63 | % | | 4.25 | % | | 4.68 | % | 4.00 | % | | 3.70 | % | | 3.25 | % | | 3.63 | % |
| Salary growth | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % | | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % | N/A |
| | 3.18 | % | | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % |
| Net Periodic Pension Cost for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.25 | % | | 4.68 | % | | 4.75 | % | | 5.00 | % | 3.25 | % | | 3.63 | % | | 4.25 | % | | 4.68 | % |
| Salary growth | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % | | N/A |
| | 3.23 | % | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % | | N/A |
| | 3.22 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets | N/A |
| | 5.78 | % | | N/A |
| | 5.99 | % | N/A |
| | 5.38 | % | | N/A |
| | 5.78 | % |
The discount rate assumption in this chart changed from 20112012 to 2012,2013, resulting in a change in the pension benefit obligation. In the chart above that reconciles the change in benefit obligations for the year, the impact of the discount rate change is included in the actuarial loss / loss/(gain) line item. The discount rate noted for foreign pension plans is a weighted average rate based on each of the applicable country's rates.
The assumed rate of return is a long-term investment return that takes into account the classes of assets held by the plan and expected returns for each class of assets. Return expectations reflect forward-looking analysis as well as historical experience.
WABCO's asset management strategy focuses on maintaining a diversified portfolio using various classes of assets to generate attractive returns while managing risk. The Company periodically reviews its target asset allocations for a given plan to ensure it aligns with the asset management strategy. In determining the target asset allocation for a given plan, consideration is given to the nature of its liabilities, and portfolios are periodically rebalanced with reference to the target level.
| | Asset Allocation | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 Target | | 2011 Target | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 Target | | 2012 Target |
| Equity securities | 19 | % | | 18 | % | | 24 | % | | 24 | % | 22 | % | | 19 | % | | 24 | % | | 24 | % |
| Debt securities | 76 | % | | 75 | % | | 71 | % | | 71 | % | 24 | % | | 76 | % | | 71 | % | | 71 | % |
| Insurance contracts | | 46 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Other * | 6 | % | | 7 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % | 8 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % |
* Included in "other" above isare investments in mutual funds held in real estateestate.
In July 2013, the Company purchased a buy-in contract from an insurance company related to a group of existing retirees covered under our United Kingdom pension plan as of that date. The 2012 targetbuy-in did not trigger settlement accounting, and resulted in a shift in the 2013 asset allocation was in line with the 2011 target allocation. The Company will continue to move towards these asset allocations in 2013.versus target.
All assets are measured at the current fair value. The fair value of the insurance contract is determined based on applicable discount rates and other observable inputs (Level 2). For all other assets, the Company determines fair value for each class of assets in its entirety using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The Company has not changed the valuation techniques and inputs used during the periods presented. The fair values for each class of assets are presented below:
| | (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Equity securities | $ | 32.2 |
| | $ | 28.4 |
| $ | 40.0 |
| | $ | 32.2 |
|
| Debt securities | 130.1 |
| | 116.6 |
| 42.5 |
| | 130.1 |
|
| Insurance contracts | | 82.2 |
| | — |
|
| Other * | 9.8 |
| | 9.6 |
| 13.4 |
| | 9.8 |
|
| Total fair value of plan assets | $ | 172.1 |
| | $ | 154.6 |
| $ | 178.1 |
| | $ | 172.1 |
|
* Included in "other" above isare investments in mutual funds held in real estate
WABCO makes contributions to funded pension plans that at a minimum, meet all statutory funding requirements. Contributions in 2012,2013, including payment of benefits incurred by unfunded plans, totaled $28.327.4 million. Contributions in 20132014 are expected to be in line with the contributions made during 2012.2013.
Expected future benefit payments are shown in the table below:
| | (Amounts in millions) | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018-2022 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019-2023 |
| Domestic plans without subsidy | $ | 1.8 |
| $ | 1.7 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 1.5 |
| $ | 1.4 |
| $ | 5.3 |
| $ | 1.8 |
| $ | 1.7 |
| $ | 1.5 |
| $ | 1.4 |
| $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 5.0 |
|
| Foreign pension plans | $ | 27.8 |
| $ | 28.2 |
| $ | 28.5 |
| $ | 28.9 |
| $ | 28.8 |
| $ | 146.6 |
| $ | 29.2 |
| $ | 29.4 |
| $ | 29.9 |
| $ | 29.7 |
| $ | 29.6 |
| $ | 152.5 |
|
The weighted average annual assumed rate of increase in the health care cost trend rate was 8.5% for 2011, 8.0% for 2012,7.0% for 2013 and is assumed to lower to 7.0%6.75% in 20132014 and then gradually decline to 4.75% by 2019.2022. The health care cost trend rate assumption has the following effect:
| | (Amounts in millions) | 1% Increase | 1% Decrease | 1% Increase | 1% Decrease |
| Effect on the health care component of accumulated post-retirement obligation | $ | 1.0 |
| $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | 0.9 |
| $ | (0.8 | ) |
| Effect on total of service and interest cost components of net periodic post-retirement health care benefit costs | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
On July 8, 2011, the Company entered into a $400 million multi-currency five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility ("revolving(revolving credit facility")facility) with the lenders and agent banks party thereto, including Banc of America Securities Limited as agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and Banc of America Securities Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., ING Belgium SA/NV, Société Générale Corporate & Investment Banking, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd and The Royal Bank of Scotland NV, (Belgium) Branch, as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners and Credit Lyonnais and Unicredit Bank AG as lead arrangers.
As of December 31, 20122013, this is our principal bank credit facility, and it expires on September 1, 2018. The original expiry date of September 1, 2016. It replaced our prior $800 million multi-currency five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility. was extended through an amendment to the current expiry date.
Under the revolving credit facility, the Company may borrow, on a revolving basis, loans in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not in excess of $400 million.$400 million. Up to $50 million under this facility may be used for issuing letters of credit, of which $48.748.8 million was unused as of December 31, 20122013, and up to $50 million is available in the form of swingline loans, all $50.050 million of which was available for use as of December 31, 20122013. At December 31, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, the carrying amount of this facility approximated fair value based upon levelLevel 2 inputs.
The balance outstanding on this facility as of December 31, 20122013, was $46.347.0 million in addition to $1.31.2 million of letters of credit, compared to $52$46.3 million and $1.3$1.3 million at as of December 201131, 2012, respectively. The balance outstanding is classified as loans payable to bankslong-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet at as of December 31, 2012.2013 since, contrary to the balance outstanding as of December 31, 2012, the Company does not intend to repay the balance within the next 12 months. The aggregate interest rate applicable on loan drawings at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was respectively 0.931%2013 and 1.0963%2012 was respectively 1.04% and 0.93%.
The proceeds of the borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to repurchase WABCO shares, finance acquisitions, refinance existing indebtedness and meet general financing requirements.
Interest on loans under the revolving credit facility will be calculated at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin which can vary from 0.80% to 1.55% based on the Company's leverage ratio plus LIBOR for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars, EURIBOR for loans denominated in Euros, HIBOR for loans denominated in Hong Kong Dollars and SIBOR for loans denominated in Singapore Dollars, plus mandatory costs, if any.
The applicable margins used to determine the LIBOR loan rate are determined based upon the Company's leverage ratio, which represents the ratio of our consolidated net indebtedness on the last day of any fiscal quarter to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for certain items) for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day. The revolving credit facility also provides for certain of the borrowers to pay various fees including a participation fee on the amount of the lenders' commitments thereunder.
The revolving credit facility contains terms and provisions (including representations, covenants and conditions) customary for credit agreements of this type. Our primary financial covenant is a leverage test which requires net indebtedness not to exceed three times adjusted four quarter trailing EBITDA. Additional financial covenants include an interest coverage test and a maximum subsidiary indebtedness test. The interest coverage test requires three times interest expense not to exceed adjusted four quarter trailing EBITDA. The maximum subsidiary indebtedness test limits the total aggregate amount of indebtedness of WABCO's subsidiaries, excluding indebtedness under the revolving credit facility, to $400 million, of which not more than $150 million may be secured. Financial covenants are not subject to any future changes in U.S. GAAP accounting standards and all cash on the balance sheet can be deducted for net indebtedness purposes. In addition, expenses and payments related to any streamlining of WABCO’s operations are excluded when calculating the four quarter trailing adjusted EBITDA. Other covenants include delivery of financial reports and other information, compliance with laws including environmental laws and permits, ERISA and U.S. regulations, limitations on liens, mergers and sales of assets and change of
business. At December 31, 20122013 the Company had the ability to borrow an incremental $352.4351.8 million, compared to $346.7 million at December 31, 2011, under our revolving credit facility, compared to $352.4 million at December 31, 2012, and we were in compliance with all the covenants.
As of December 31, 20122013, the Company's various subsidiaries had borrowings from banks totaling $29.540.1 million, of which $27.7$36.4 million relates related to our Accounts Receivable Securitization Program referred to in Note 10 above, compared to respectively $26.2$29.5 million and $24.4$27.7 million at December 31, 2011.2012. The remaining $1.83.7 million balance at December 31, 2013 supports local working capital requirements.
| |
| NOTE 14. | Warranties, Guarantees, Commitments and Contingencies |
Warranties
Products sold by WABCO are covered by a basic limited warranty with terms and conditions that vary depending upon the product and country in which it was sold. The limited warranty covers the equipment, parts and labor (in certain cases) necessary to satisfy the warranty obligation generally for a period of two years. Estimated product warranty expenses are accrued in cost of goods sold at the time the related sale is recognized. Estimates of warranty expenses are based primarily on warranty claims experience and specific customer contracts. Warranty expenses include accruals for basic warranties for product sold, as well as accruals for product recalls, service campaigns and other related events when they are known and estimable. To the extent WABCO experiences changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those
claims, its warranty accrual is adjusted accordingly. Warranty accrual estimates and the allocation of warranty between short and long term are updated based upon the most current warranty claims information available.
The following is a summary of changes in the Company’s product warranty liability for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 2010 (amounts in millions).2011.
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Balance of warranty costs accrued, beginning of period | $ | 52.6 |
| | $ | 44.9 |
| | 45.8 |
| $ | 55.2 |
| | $ | 52.6 |
| | $ | 44.9 |
|
| Warranty costs accrued | 27.1 |
| | 41.9 |
| | 32.6 |
| 21.4 |
| | 27.1 |
| | 41.9 |
|
| Warranty claims settled | (25.3 | ) | | (33.0 | ) | | (31.3 | ) | (26.5 | ) | | (25.3 | ) | | (33.0 | ) |
| Foreign exchange translation effects | 0.8 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | 1.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | (1.2 | ) |
| Balance of warranty costs accrued, end of period | $ | 55.2 |
| | $ | 52.6 |
| | 44.9 |
| $ | 51.6 |
| | $ | 55.2 |
| | $ | 52.6 |
|
| Current liability, included in current portion of warranties | $ | 33.8 |
| | $ | 42.3 |
| | 41.7 |
| $ | 29.8 |
| | $ | 33.8 |
| | $ | 42.3 |
|
| Long-term liability, included in other liabilities | $ | 21.4 |
| | $ | 10.3 |
| | 3.2 |
| $ | 21.8 |
| | $ | 21.4 |
| | $ | 10.3 |
|
Guarantees and Commitments
Future minimum rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases with original terms in excess of one year in effect at December 31, 20122013, are: $18.8 million in 2013; $12.317.2 million in 2014; $10.011.6 million in 2015; $8.19.2 million in 2016; $6.98.3 million in 20172017; $6.1 million in 2018 and $12.313.1 million thereafter, a total of $68.465.5 million. Net rental expense for all operating leases was $19.618.9 million, $19.019.6 million and $16.119.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.
The Company has bank guarantees for $29.550.6 million which is comprised of uncollateralized bank guarantees, of which $23.144.9 million is related to tax and other litigation, $1.31.2 million is related to letters of credit and $5.14.5 million is related to other items.
The Company has inventory and receivables that are pledged against a local bank facility in India to support local working capital requirements of approximately $10.07.3 million. Also, the Company has pledged unsold receivables under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Program of €€3.2 million (9.8 million ($12.9$4.4 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates).
Contingencies
General
We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to products and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable and reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of liability to be recorded, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue.
Litigation
On June 23, 2010, the European Commission (the “Commission”)Commission) issued a decision imposing a total of €326.1 million in fines, or approximately $400 million on the date of assessment (the “EC Fine”)EC Fine), on the former American Standard Companies Inc. (now Trane Inc., hereinafter referred to as “American Standard” or “Trane”), and certain of its European subsidiaries engaged in the Bath and Kitchen business and successor entities for infringements of European Union competition rules relating to the distribution of bathroom fixtures and fittings in a number of European countries. Pursuant to our Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement with Trane, WABCO Europe BVBA (an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of WABCO) is responsible for, and is liable to indemnify Trane Inc. and Ideal Standard International (representing the successor to the Bath and Kitchen business, and owner of certain of the former American Standard subsidiaries) and their owners against the EC Fine.
As required by the Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement, WABCO paid the fine amount into escrow on August 30, 2010, using €230.0 million of cash on hand and €96.1 million of additional borrowings under a revolving credit facility. The funds were subsequently released from escrow and paid to the Commission. After reviewing all of the elements of the case, WABCO decided to appeal the decision in order to try to have the fine reduced.
On September 8, 2010, WABCO filed its appeal in16, 2013, the General Court of the European Union located(the General Court) delivered its judgment and annulled in Luxembourg. On March 27, 2012,part the oral hearing fordecision of the appeal took place beforeCommission, reducing the court. This wasoriginal fine of €326.1 million by €205.8 million to €120.3 million. Since WABCO had paid the final step infull amount of the procedure before a judgment is handed down. The Company anticipates that a decision onEC Fine (as described above), WABCO has received the appeal will be made beforefull amount of the endreimbursement from the Commission during the fourth quarter of 2013. The Commission did not appeal the judgment of the General Court within the mandatory time limit. The judgment of the General Court is now final.
Other
In conjunction with the Tax Sharing Agreement, as further discussed in "Note 16. Tax and Indemnification Liabilities Transferred from Trane to WABCO,"Note 16, WABCO is responsible for certain tax and indemnification liabilities. These liabilities include probable indemnification liabilities to Trane of $18.89.2 million as of December 31, 20122013. It is reasonably possible that the Company could incur losses in excess of the amounts accrued. Although this amount cannot be estimated, we believe that any additional losses would not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Income before income taxes and the applicable provision for income taxes were:were :
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Income before income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Domestic | $ | 77.2 |
| | $ | 72.4 |
| | $ | 33.5 |
| $ | 94.4 |
| | $ | 77.2 |
| | $ | 72.4 |
|
| Foreign | 258.9 |
| | 332.5 |
| | (210.8 | ) | 546.5 |
| | 258.9 |
| | 332.5 |
|
| | $ | 336.1 |
| | $ | 404.9 |
| | $ | (177.3 | ) | $ | 640.9 |
| | $ | 336.1 |
| | $ | 404.9 |
|
| Provision / (benefit) for income taxes: | | | |
| | |
| |
| (Benefit)/provision for income taxes: | | | | |
| | |
|
| Current: | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Domestic | $ | (6.2 | ) | | $ | 24.9 |
| | $ | 11.2 |
| $ | 11.4 |
| | $ | (6.2 | ) | | $ | 24.9 |
|
| Foreign | 32.7 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 28.3 |
| 32.2 |
| | 32.7 |
| | 9.9 |
|
| | 26.5 |
| | 34.8 |
| | 39.5 |
| $ | 43.6 |
| | $ | 26.5 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
|
| Deferred: | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| Domestic | 0.1 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | $ | 101.7 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.4 | ) |
| Foreign | (3.0 | ) | | 2.3 |
| | (1.3 | ) | (166.3 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | 2.3 |
|
| | (2.9 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | (2.6 | ) | $ | (64.6 | ) | | $ | (2.9 | ) | | $ | 1.9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total provision / (benefit) | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 36.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| |
| Total (benefit)/provision | | $ | (21.0 | ) | | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 36.7 |
|
A reconciliation between the actual income tax expense provided and the income taxes computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35.0% in 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 to the income before income taxes is as follows:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Tax provision at statutory rate | $ | 117.4 |
| | $ | 141.7 |
| | $ | (62.1 | ) | $ | 224.3 |
| | $ | 117.4 |
| | $ | 141.7 |
|
| Separation related taxes and contingencies | 2.2 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 4.7 |
| — |
| | 2.2 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Foreign earnings taxed at other than 35% | (71.9 | ) | | (76.6 | ) | | (45.5 | ) | (93.9 | ) | | (71.9 | ) | | (76.6 | ) |
| Increase/(Decrease) in valuation allowance | 109.8 |
| | (33.4 | ) | | — |
| |
| (Decrease)/increase in valuation allowance | | (261.9 | ) | | 109.8 |
| | (33.4 | ) |
| Unremitted foreign earnings | | 107.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| EC fine indemnity | (116.3 | ) | | — |
| | 134.9 |
| — |
| | (116.3 | ) | | — |
|
| Tax contingency accruals | 8.1 |
| | 18.8 |
| | 4.3 |
| — |
| | 8.1 |
| | 18.8 |
|
| Benefit of tax contingency reversals | (30.0 | ) | | (19.2 | ) | | (3.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | | (30.0 | ) | | (19.2 | ) |
| Equity Compensation | 5.0 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 3.9 |
| |
| Equity compensation | | 4.4 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.2 |
|
| Other, net | (0.7 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | | 0.3 |
| (0.9 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
| Total provision | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 36.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| |
| Total (benefit)/ provision | | $ | (21.0 | ) | | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 36.7 |
|
The effective income tax rates for 20122013 and 20112012 were 7.1%(3.3)% and 9.1%7.1%, respectively. The income tax provisionbenefit for 2012 is principally driven by income2013 includes taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and certaina tax provision on unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States as discussed further below. Additionally, the tax planning. As such,provision is offset by the release of a valuation allowance related to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction as also discussed below. Furthermore, the Company also recognized a tax benefit of $2.4 million due to the impact of U.S. tax legislation enacted in January 2013 and a tax benefit of $2.4 million related to the Company's filing of its 2012 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return in September 2013.
The nature of the reconciling item "Foreign earnings taxed at other than 35%", also includes is net of permanent differences including non-taxable income in foreign jurisdictions, foreign tax incentives such as recently obtained tax rulings in Europe, and certain tax credits, resulting in a net tax benefit. Additionally,
In 2013, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $178.4 million for a release at the end of the year of a valuation allowance related to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. In particular, evidence such as our historical operating profits resulting in a cumulative profitable position during the three-year period ending on December 31, 2013, the receipt of an exceptional EC fine refund in the fourth quarter of 2013 and projected operating profits represented sufficient positive evidence to release a full valuation allowance at the end of 2013 on the deferred tax asset under ASC 740. The release of this valuation allowance was recorded as an income tax benefit as of December 31, 2013 which significantly reduced our effective tax rate, resulting in a negative effective tax rate. We expect our effective tax rate to increase in subsequent periods following this release of the valuation allowance. Our net income and effective tax rate will be negatively affected in periods following this release. However, the valuation allowance release will not affect the amount of cash paid for income taxes.
Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize $10.1 million its deferred tax assets in other foreign jurisdictions since evidence such as historical operating profits resulted in a cumulative loss position during the most recent three-year period ending on December 31, 2013 and lack of projected earnings provided sufficient negative evidence to record a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets related to carryforwards for net operating losses and notional interest deductions.
At the end of 2013, the Company recorded a tax provision of $107.4 million related to unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. This assertion is resulting from the Company recognizing earnings in the fourth quarter of €209.8 million from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine. As such, the Company obtained a special authorization from its Board of Directors to purchase an additional $200.0 million of Company stock through December 31, 2014. Under U.S. GAAP rules, unremitted foreign earnings where the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment are deemed to be repatriated to the United States.
In 2012, the income tax provision iswas offset by the release of tax accruals for uncertain tax positions due to certain government filings submitted in January 2012 of approximately $24.8 million, as adjusted from an amount of $18.8$18.8 million as previously disclosed in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K. As further discussed below, as a result of a settlement of a foreign tax audit in the fourth quarter of 2012, a portion of the EC fine indemnity deduction claimed in 2010 was accepted and added to existing net operating losses. The tax effect of this settlement was $$116.3 million, the benefit for which was fully offset by an increase to a valuation allowance and thus had no impact on the Company's effective tax rate. The
In 2011, the income tax provision for 2011 was principally driven by income taxes in profitable jurisdictions offset by benefits related to ongoing foreign tax planning activities, a decrease of a valuation allowance of $33.4$33.4 million, and the release of certain tax accruals. In addition, the Company recorded a tax provision of $12.7$12.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2011 due to its decision to repatriate earnings from a foreign affiliate of approximately $299.0 million. As further discussed below, the Company did not recognize a tax benefit of $134.9 million at December 31, 2010 foreign exchange rates for the payment of the EC fine indemnity in the third quarter of 2010.$299.0 million. It should be noted that changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws or rulings may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.
The approximate dollar and diluted earnings per share amounts of tax reductions related to tax holidays and incentive tax credits in various countries in which the Company does business were $7.8 million and $0.12 in 2013, $6.5 million and $0.10 in 2012 and $4.1 million and $0.06 in 2011, and $4.3 million and $0.07 in 2010, respectively. The tax holidays and incentive tax credits expire at various dates through 2020.2026.
The following table details the gross deferred tax liabilities and assets and the related valuation allowances:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Basis difference in minority interest | $ | 11.4 |
| | $ | 11.2 |
| |
| Basis difference in noncontrolling interest | | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 11.4 |
|
| Facilities (accelerated depreciation, capitalized interest and purchase accounting differences) | 23.3 |
| | 22.2 |
| 21.0 |
| | 23.3 |
|
| Inventory (LIFO) | — |
| | 1.7 |
| |
| Unremitted foreign earnings | | 107.8 |
| | — |
|
| Intangibles | 3.6 |
| | 4.1 |
| 3.4 |
| | 3.6 |
|
| Other | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
|
| | $ | 38.3 |
| | $ | 39.2 |
| $ | 144.1 |
| | $ | 38.3 |
|
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Foreign net operating losses and tax credits | $ | 293.0 |
| | $ | 174.4 |
| $ | 195.7 |
| | $ | 293.0 |
|
| Post-retirement and other employee benefits | 45.4 |
| | 23.1 |
| 43.2 |
| | 45.4 |
|
| Intangibles | 0.9 |
| | 4.4 |
| 35.7 |
| | 32.7 |
|
| Inventory | 0.6 |
| | — |
| 0.8 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Warranties | 2.5 |
| | 2.2 |
| 1.4 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Other | 11.6 |
| | 7.2 |
| 16.5 |
| | 11.6 |
|
| | $ | 354.0 |
| | $ | 211.3 |
| $ | 293.3 |
| | $ | 385.8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Valuation allowances | (240.2 | ) | | (130.4 | ) | (10.1 | ) | | (272.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 75.5 |
| | $ | 41.7 |
| $ | 139.1 |
| | $ | 75.5 |
|
At December 31, 20122013, the Company has $863.3578.0 million of net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs) available for utilization in future years. Approximately $825.9537.7 million of such NOLs have an unlimited life and the remainder is available for periods of up to 7 years. The NOLs primarily consist of NOLs inherited by WABCO upon separation from Trane and losses incurred in post-spin years. As of December 31, 2012,2013, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance of $240.210.1 million representing the value of the associated deferred tax asset with regard to $706.731.2 million of NOLs available for up to 6 years. As discussed above, the unlimited life NOLs. These NOLs consistCompany released $178.4 million of NOLs inherited by WABCO upon separation from Trane, losses incurred in post-spin years, as well as a portion of the EC fine indemnity as discussed below. We may be required to release all or a portion of this valuation allowance in the next 12 months, although the exact timing and the amount of the valuation allowance released are subjectrelated to change based on the level of profitability that we are able to actually achieve for the year and our visibility into future period results. Because evidence such as our historical operating results during the most recent years is afforded more weight than forecasted results for future periods, our cumulative loss during the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 represents sufficient negative evidence regarding the need for a full valuation allowance under ASC 740. We will release this valuation allowance when management determinesmanagement’s determination that it is more likely than not that ourthe Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will be realized.not realize $10.1 million of its deferred tax assets in other foreign jurisdictions and has recorded a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets as discussed above.
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 20122013 amounted to $46.245.3 million primarily related to the WABCO business and $1.5 millionwhich is classified as a long-term liability. There are no material unrecognized tax benefits related to WABCO obligations directly to tax authorities for Trane’s Bath and& Kitchen business as further discussed in Note 16. Tax and Indemnification Liabilities Transferred from Trane to WABCO. Moreover, $47.7 million of the unrecognized tax benefits are classified as long-term liabilities. Interest related to unrecognized tax benefits recorded in the 2013, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 consolidated statementstatements of income were $1.10.3 million, $0.81.1 million and $3.10.8 million, respectively. Total accrued interest atas of December 31, 2013, 2012 December 31,and 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $5.76.0 million, $4.65.7 million and $8.74.6 million, respectively. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. No material penalties have been accrued related to these unrecognized tax benefits.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (exclusive of interest):
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | 2011 |
| Beginning balance, January 1 | $ | 209.6 |
| | $ | 208.3 |
| $ | 74.5 |
| $ | 41.9 |
| | $ | 209.6 |
| $ | 208.3 |
|
| Additions for tax positions related to current year | — |
| | 19.7 |
| 139.2 |
| — |
| | — |
| 19.7 |
|
| Additions for tax positions related to prior years | 7.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| 1.2 |
| | 7.5 |
| — |
|
| Reductions for tax positions related to prior years | (172.4 | ) | | (12.9 | ) | — |
| — |
| | (172.4 | ) | (12.9 | ) |
| Cash settlements | (1.5 | ) | | (10.6 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (2.0 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | (10.6 | ) |
| Expirations of statute of limitations | (2.6 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | — |
| (2.0 | ) | | (2.6 | ) | (5.2 | ) |
| Foreign exchange | 1.3 |
| | 10.3 |
| (1.8 | ) | 0.2 |
| | 1.3 |
| 10.3 |
|
| Ending balance, December 31 | $ | 41.9 |
| | $ | 209.6 |
| $ | 208.3 |
| $ | 39.3 |
| | $ | 41.9 |
| $ | 209.6 |
|
In 2013, the reversal of $4.0 million during the year relates to the settlement of certain US state tax exposures and the expiration of statutes of limitations in certain foreign jurisdictions
In 2010, the Company recorded an uncertain tax position of approximately 135.8 million at then foreign exchange rates related to tax deductions in foreign jurisdictions for the payment of an EC fine indemnity. The deduction claimed for 396.9 million of the EC fine indemnity added to existing net operating losses in a foreign jurisdiction that has a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset for such NOLs. The use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for recording an unrecognized tax position is not permitted under US GAAP. As a result, the unrecognized tax benefit had been recorded as a reduction of the deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance in 2010. In the fourth quarter of 2012, as a result of the settlement of a foreign tax audit, $342.3 million, at December 31, 2012 foreign exchange rates, of the EC fine indemnity tax deduction claimed in 2010 was accepted. Thus, the 2010 reserve for this uncertain tax position has been reversed and addsadded $116.3 million to existing net operating losses in a foreign jurisdiction that hashad a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset for such NOLs. The remaining amount of $29.0 million iswas also removed from the tabular rollforward for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012, due to the settlement.
The reversal of $172.4$172.4 million during 2012 relates to the settlement of a foreign tax audit as described above, certain government filings submitted in January 2012, and the expiration of statutes of limitation. The
In 2011, there was a reversal of $28.7 million during 2011 relatesrelated to the closure of foreign tax audits and the expiration of statutes of limitation. In addition, the Company will recognize a tax benefit of $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2013 due to the impact of U.S. tax legislation enacted in January 2013. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were $39.3 million, $41.9 million and 2010 there are $41.9$209.6 million, $209.6 million, and $208.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the annual effective tax rate.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, WABCO or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Belgium, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States. With no material exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. TheHowever, the Company is currently under examination in the United States for tax years 2010 and 2011. In addition, the Company may realize a reduction of up to $11.22.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within 12 months as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitation.settlements for certain tax exposures.
As a result of the allocation of purchase accounting (principally goodwill) to foreign subsidiaries, the book basis in the net assets of the foreign subsidiaries exceeds the related U.S. tax basis in the subsidiaries' stock. Such investments are considered permanent in duration and accordingly, no deferred taxes have been provided on such differences, which are significant. The Company considers the earnings of substantially all of its foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S.United States due to operational, strategic and other needs to support the growth of the Company and as such, no deferred tax liability has been provided. TheHowever, the Company has provided for tax at the U.S. tax rate for its Brazilian affiliate's current year earnings in 2012.2013. In addition, as discussed above, due to the receipt in the fourth quarter of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission that increased earnings beyond these operational, strategic and other needs outside the United States, the Company recorded a tax provision for $300.0 million of its Belgian affiliate’s earnings for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. The Company estimates the amount of its permanently reinvested unremitted foreign earnings to be approximately $475840 million as of December 31, 2012,2013, however, it is not practicable to estimate the tax liability that would arise if the earnings that are considered permanently reinvested were remitted to the U.S.United States.
| |
| NOTE 16. | Tax and Indemnification Liabilities Transferred from Trane to WABCO |
Pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement between Trane and WABCO, entered into on July 16, 2007, and other agreements with Trane as filed in WABCO’s Form 10 prior to its spin-off from Trane, WABCO is responsible for certain tax contingencies and indemnification liabilities. As noted in Note 15. Income Taxes,15, the liabilities as of December 31, 20122013 include $included 1.5 millionno material amounts related to non-U.S. entities of Trane’s former Bath and Kitchen business but for which WABCO entities have obligations directly to non-U.S. tax authorities. In addition, as of December 31, 20122013, the Company had probable indemnification liabilities of $18.89.2 million, compared to $18.8 million as of December 31, 2012, which iswere classified within long-term liabilities on the balance sheet. It is reasonably possible that the Company could incur losses in excess of the amounts accrued. Although this amount cannot be estimated, we believe that any additional losses would not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements.
During 2012,2013, approximately $1.28.8 million of indemnification liabilities waswere reversed in the consolidated statement of incomeoperations due to the settlement of foreign tax audits and the expiration of a statute of limitations.
Under an indemnification agreement, WABCO Brazil is responsible for certain claims related to its business for periods prior to the spin-off of WABCO from American Standard. In particular, there are tax claims pending in various stages of the Brazilian legal process related to income, social contribution and/or value added taxes for which a contingency exists and which may or may not ultimately be incurred by the Company. The estimated total amount of the claims as of December 31, 20122013 iswas $46.242.1 million including interest. However, based on management’s assessment and advice of our external legal counsel, the Company believes that it has valid arguments in all of these cases and the likelihood of loss is not probable and thus no accrual is required at this time.
NOTE 17. Related Party Transactions
Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
WABCO has three investments in affiliates that are accounted for byunder the equity method. The first of these investments is in Meritor WABCO. Meritor WABCO, in which WABCO has a 50% equity ownership, markets braking systems products and sells the majority of WABCO products in the United States. The second of these investments is in WABCO Automotive South Africa (“WABCO SA”)(WABCO SA). WABCO SA, in which WABCO has a 49% equity ownership, is a distributor of breaking systems products and sells WABCO products primarily in South Africa. The third investment is in WABCOWURTH Workshop Services GmbH (“WABCOWURTH”)(WABCOWURTH). WABCOWURTH, in which WABCO has a 50% equity ownership, supplies commercial vehicle workshops, fleet owners and operators and end users internationally with its multi-brand technology diagnostic system.
As of December 31, 20122013, WABCO has net investments in and advances to Meritor WABCO of $16.615.0 million, WABCO SA of $2.94.0 million and WABCOWURTH of $1.00.9 million. WABCO received dividends from the joint ventures of $15.218.3 million, $14.415.2 million and $8.414.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.
| | | (Amounts in Millions) | WABCO Sales to | | WABCO Purchases from | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | WABCO Sales to | | WABCO Purchases from |
Joint Venture | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Meritor WABCO | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | 174.0 |
| | $ | 127.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| $ | 176.0 |
| | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | 174.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
|
| WABCO SA | 6.7 |
| | 7.6 |
| | 5.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 5.7 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 7.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| WABCOWURTH | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
|
| | | (Amounts in Millions) | WABCO Receivables from | | WABCO Payables to | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | WABCO Receivables from | | WABCO Payables to |
Joint Venture | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Meritor WABCO | $ | 24.8 |
| | $ | 32.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 28.3 |
| | $ | 24.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| WABCO SA | 2.1 |
| | 2.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1.1 |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| WABCOWURTH | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
|
Consolidated Joint Ventures
WABCO has fourthree fully consolidated joint ventures.ventures as of December 31, 2013. The first of these joint ventures is in Japan with Sanwa-Seiki and itwhere Sanwa-Seiki distributes WABCO's products in the local market. WABCO's ownership interest in the joint venture with Sanwa-Seiki is 90%.
The second joint venture is in the U.S.United States with Cummins Engine Co. ("Cummins")(Cummins), a manufacturing partnership formed to produce air compressors designed by WABCO. WABCO's ownership interest in the joint venture with Cummins is 70%.
The third joint venture is with Guangdong FUWA Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., (“FUWA”)(FUWA) to produce air disc brakes for commercial trailers in China. FUWA is the largest manufacturer of commercial trailer axles in China and in the world. WABCO's ownership interest in the joint venture with FUWA is 70%.
TheA fourth joint venture is with Mingshui Automotive Fitting Factory ("MAFF"),(MAFF) to produce conventional mechanical products to the local market.market was ended in 2013 when the Company acquired the remaining shares in the joint venture. Prior to this acquisition, WABCO's ownership interest in the joint venture with MAFF iswas 70%. Sales to and purchases from MAFF were immaterial in the year ended December 31, 20122013 and previous years. See Note 21 for further information.
| | | (Amounts in Millions) | WABCO Sales to | | WABCO Purchases from | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | WABCO Sales to | | WABCO Purchases from |
Joint Venture | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Sanwa-Seiki | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 42.9 |
| | 39.3 |
| | 35.8 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 33.7 |
| | $ | 42.9 |
| | $ | 39.3 |
|
| Cummins | 75.8 |
| | 68.5 |
| | 44.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 72.9 |
| | 75.8 |
| | 68.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| FUWA | 1.0 |
| | 4.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 3.0 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 4.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
NOTE 18. Geographic Information
WABCO is a fully integrated global business with management structures established in a variety of ways, including around products, distribution channels and key customers. Our largest customer is Daimler, which accounted for 11%12%, 12%11% and 13%12% of our sales in 20122013, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively. Volvo accounted for 10%, 11%10% and 10%11% of our sales in 20122013, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively. WABCO's plants, engineering, technical support, distribution centers and other support functions are shared among various product families and serve all distribution channels with many customers. Based on the organizational structure, as well as the nature of financial information available and reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions about resource allocations, the Company has concluded that its total WABCO operations represent one reportable segment and that WABCO's performance and future net cash flow perspectives are best understood and assessed as such.
European sales for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 accounted for 60%61%, 62%60% and 60%62% of total sales, respectively. Asian sales for the years ended December 31, 20122013, 20112012 and 20102011 accounted for 20%18%, 19%20% and 22%19% of total sales, respectively. We are strongly rooted in China and India and have achieved a leading position in the marketplace through increasingly close connectivity to customers. We are further strengthened in Asia by an outstanding network of suppliers, manufacturing sites and engineering hubs.
Geographic Data
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Product Sales: | | | | | | | | | | |
| OEM | $ | 1,847.4 |
| | $ | 2,150.4 |
| | $ | 1,605.6 |
| $ | 2,043.5 |
| | $ | 1,847.4 |
| | $ | 2,150.4 |
|
| Aftermarket | 630.0 |
| | 643.7 |
| | 570.1 |
| 677.0 |
| | 630.0 |
| | 643.7 |
|
| Sales-Geographic distribution (a): | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 274.5 |
| | $ | 246.2 |
| | $ | 173.6 |
| $ | 296.2 |
| | $ | 274.5 |
| | $ | 246.2 |
|
Europe (countries below are included in this total) | 1,496.7 |
| | 1,737.5 |
| | 1,318.7 |
| 1,666.3 |
| | 1,496.7 |
| | 1,737.5 |
|
| Germany | 657.6 |
| | 759.0 |
| | 579.6 |
| 731.3 |
| | 657.6 |
| | 759.0 |
|
| France | 89.0 |
| | 111.9 |
| | 90.0 |
| 99.5 |
| | 89.0 |
| | 111.9 |
|
| Sweden | 201.7 |
| | 238.2 |
| | 171.2 |
| 215.4 |
| | 201.7 |
| | 238.2 |
|
Other (countries below are included in this total) | 706.2 |
| | 810.4 |
| | 683.4 |
| 758.0 |
| | 706.2 |
| | 810.4 |
|
| Japan | 116.1 |
| | 104.6 |
| | 82.7 |
| 100.5 |
| | 116.1 |
| | 104.6 |
|
| China | 152.3 |
| | 162.1 |
| | 159.7 |
| 192.6 |
| | 152.3 |
| | 162.1 |
|
| Brazil | 135.3 |
| | 195.3 |
| | 153.1 |
| 180.9 |
| | 135.3 |
| | 195.3 |
|
| India | 147.0 |
| | 181.7 |
| | 158.4 |
| 106.1 |
| | 147.0 |
| | 181.7 |
|
| Total sales | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
| | $ | 2,175.7 |
| $ | 2,720.5 |
| | $ | 2,477.4 |
| | $ | 2,794.1 |
|
| |
| (a) | Sales to external customers are classified by country of destination. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Long-lived Assets (b) | | | | | |
| Geographic distribution: | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 14.1 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
|
Europe (countries below are included in this total) | 655.7 |
| | 607.8 |
| | 576.2 |
|
| Germany | 323.7 |
| | 303.2 |
| | 295.6 |
|
| Poland | 110.8 |
| | 93.7 |
| | 79.5 |
|
Other (countries below are included in this total) | 213.5 |
| | 220.5 |
| | 209.0 |
|
| India | 97.7 |
| | 104.1 |
| | 98.7 |
|
| Total long-lived assets | $ | 889.4 |
| | $ | 842.4 |
| | $ | 797.1 |
|
| |
| (b) | Amounts are presented on a net basis |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
(Amounts in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| Long-lived Assets (b) | | | | | |
| Geographic distribution: | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 14.1 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 7.3 |
|
Europe (countries below are included in this total) | 607.8 |
| | 576.2 |
| | 580.6 |
|
| Germany | 303.2 |
| | 295.6 |
| | 324.9 |
|
| Poland | 93.7 |
| | 79.5 |
| | 80.9 |
|
Other (countries below are included in this total) | 220.5 |
| | 209.0 |
| | 207.4 |
|
| India | 104.1 |
| | 98.7 |
| | 104.6 |
|
| Total long-lived assets | $ | 842.4 |
| | $ | 797.1 |
| | $ | 795.3 |
|
(b)Amounts are presented on a gross basis
NOTE 19. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
ASC topic 815, "Derivatives and HedgingHedging", requires a company to recognize all of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it qualifies and has been designated as a relationship hedge. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value using Level 2 inputs and these are classified as “other current assets,” “other assets,” “other accrued liabilities” or “other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet. Level 2 inputs used by the Company in valuing its derivative instruments include model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. The earnings impact resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments is recorded in the same line item in the consolidated statement of operations as the underlying exposure being hedged or in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) for derivatives that qualify and have been designated as cash flow hedges or hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument's change in fair value is recognized in earnings together with changes in the fair value of any derivatives not designated as relationship hedges.
Foreign exchange contracts are used by the Company to offset the earnings impact relating to the variability in exchange rates on certain assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies and have not been designated as relationship hedges. As of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively, forward contracts for an aggregate notional amount of €43.4€61.8 million ($57.4 ($85.3 million at December 31, 20122013 exchange rates) and€205.1 €43.4 million ($265.9 ($57.4 million at December 31, 20112012 exchange rates) were outstanding with an average duration of one month. These foreign exchange contracts have offset the revaluation of assets and liabilities. The majority of these exchange contracts were entered into on December 28th 2012. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the30, 2013. The fair value of the derivatives was immaterial.$0.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and immaterial as of December 31, 2012.
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized net gainslosses on its derivative instruments of $8.7$2.2 million and net gains of $8.7 million, respectively, in "other non-operating expense, net" onwithin the consolidated statement of operations. For the year ended December 31 2011, the Company recognized net gains of $0.2 million, of which $1.5 million was recognized in "cost of sales" and $1.7 million in "other non-operating expense, net".
NOTE 20. Business Combinations
On September 13, 2012, the Company completed its acquisition of Ephicas, based in the Netherlands, a pioneering company in the field of innovative aerodynamic solutions for commercial vehicles. The Company acquired all of the equity interests in Ephicas and also assumed certain liabilities. Leveraging Ephicas’ expertise and patented technologies, the Company will developis developing a range of aerodynamic products – branded OptiFlow™ – that are designed to increase vehicle efficiency and reduce fuel consumption for trucks, trailers and buses.
The acquisition iswas recorded in accordance with ASC 805 - "Business Combinations ("ASC 805")Combinations". ASC 805 requires that all identifiable intangible assets be recognized as an asset apart from goodwill if the asset arises from contractual or other legal
rights, or is separable from the acquired entity. The fair value of the Ephicas business identified intangible assets iswas $2.1 million and goodwill iswas $3.6 million.
NOTE 21. Noncontrolling Interests
On August 30, 2013, WABCO acquired the remaining shares in SWAP, its Chinese joint venture, from MAFF for cash consideration of $4.6 million thus increasing its ownership from 70% to 100%. The table below shows the effect of the change in ownership interest on the Company's equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Net income attributable to Company | $ | 653.2 |
| | $ | 302.0 |
|
| Transfers from the noncontrolling interest: | | | |
| Increase in paid-in capital for acquisition of noncontrolling interest | 1.1 |
| | — |
|
| Net transfers from noncontrolling interest | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Change from net income attributable to Company and transfers from noncontrolling interest | $ | 654.3 |
| | $ | 302.0 |
|
NOTE 22. Subsequent Events
On February 12, 2014, WABCO Europe BVBA (WABCO Europe), a Belgian subsidiary of the Company, entered into a stock purchase agreement (the Agreement) with Creafund Transics Shares Stille Maatschap, Mr. Ludwig Lemenu, Mr. Walter Mastelinck, Cassel BVBA and Uniholding SA (collectively, the “Sellers”) by which WABCO Europe purchased all of the outstanding shares of Tavares NV (Tavares), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Belgium, from the Sellers for a purchase price of €111.1 million, which included the acquisition of €15.3 million of net cash held by Transics International, resulting in net consideration of €95.8 million.
Tavares holds 96.84% of the outstanding shares of Transics International NV (Transics), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Belgium currently listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. Transics develops and markets fleet management solutions to help commercial vehicle manufacturers and fleet operators to more efficiently and safely manage their trucks and trailers. The suite of innovative solutions offered by Transics helps to improve fuel efficiency and productivity while lowering operating costs. In connection with the acquisition of Tavares, WABCO Europe will make a mandatory public offer to acquire the remaining shares and warrants issued by Transics in accordance with applicable Belgian takeover rules.
NOTE 23. Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
| | | | Year 2012 | Year 2013 |
| (Amounts in millions) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| Sales | $ | 657.3 |
| | $ | 635.2 |
| | $ | 588.3 |
| | $ | 596.5 |
| $ | 644.7 |
| | $ | 678.2 |
| | $ | 677.1 |
| | $ | 720.5 |
|
| Cost of sales | 461.2 |
| | 441.5 |
| | 413.1 |
| | 421.3 |
| 447.0 |
| | 471.6 |
| | 477.6 |
| | 515.2 |
|
| Gross profit | 196.1 |
| | 193.7 |
| | 175.2 |
| | 175.2 |
| 197.7 |
| | 206.6 |
| | 199.5 |
| | 205.3 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 93.4 |
| | 96.5 |
| | 76.2 |
| | 70.1 |
| 84.2 |
| | 95.5 |
| | 90.5 |
| | 370.8 |
|
| Income tax expense / (benefit) | 1.4 |
| | 17.6 |
| | (3.3 | ) | | 8.0 |
| 8.2 |
| | 9.7 |
| | 8.0 |
| | (46.8 | ) |
| Net income attributable to Company | 89.2 |
| | 75.6 |
| | 77.5 |
| | 59.7 |
| $ | 73.7 |
| | $ | 83.2 |
| | $ | 80.0 |
| | $ | 416.3 |
|
| Net income per common share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.38 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
| $ | 1.17 |
| | $ | 1.33 |
| | $ | 1.28 |
| | $ | 6.73 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.15 |
| | $ | 1.19 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
| $ | 1.15 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
| | $ | 6.65 |
|
| | | | Year 2011 | Year 2012 |
| (Amounts in millions) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| Sales | $ | 678.2 |
| | $ | 737.7 |
| | $ | 706.3 |
| | $ | 672.0 |
| $ | 657.3 |
| | $ | 635.2 |
| | $ | 588.3 |
| | $ | 596.5 |
|
| Cost of sales | 481.9 |
| | 520.0 |
| | 501.9 |
| | 482.5 |
| 461.2 |
| | 441.5 |
| | 413.1 |
| | 421.3 |
|
| Gross profit | 196.3 |
| | 217.7 |
| | 204.4 |
| | 189.5 |
| 196.1 |
| | 193.7 |
| | 175.2 |
| | 175.2 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 115.1 |
| | 100.5 |
| | 96.0 |
| | 93.2 |
| 93.4 |
| | 96.5 |
| | 76.2 |
| | 70.1 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) / expense | (3.2 | ) | | 10.6 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 20.1 |
| |
| Income tax expense / (benefit) | | 1.4 |
| | 17.6 |
| | (3.3 | ) | | 8.0 |
|
| Net income attributable to Company | $ | 114.7 |
| | $ | 88.6 |
| | $ | 83.8 |
| | $ | 69.8 |
| $ | 89.2 |
| | $ | 75.6 |
| | $ | 77.5 |
| | $ | 59.7 |
|
| Net income per common share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 1.25 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| $ | 1.38 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 1.66 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.15 |
| | $ | 1.19 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
|
The sum of each value line for the four quarters does not necessarily equal the amount reported for the full year because of rounding.
The income tax benefit for 2013 includes taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions, and a tax provision on unremitted foreign earnings of $300.0 million in a Belgian affiliate for which the Company does not assert permanent reinvestment outside the United States. This assertion is resulting from the Company recognizing earnings in the fourth quarter from the receipt of an exceptional refund including interest from the European Commission related to the Company’s appeal of the EC fine as further discussed in Note 15. Additionally, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $178.4 million for a release at the end of the year of a valuation allowance related to management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax asset in a foreign jurisdiction. Management has also determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize $10.1 million of its deferred tax assets in other foreign jurisdictions and has recorded a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets.
The income tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2012 is the net result of the release of tax accruals for uncertain tax positions due to certain government filings submitted in January 2012, a tax benefit related to the Company's filing of its 2011 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return in September 2012, taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions and benefits from certain foreign tax planning.
The income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2011 is the net result of the release of tax accruals as a consequence of the settlement of foreign tax audits, taxes on earnings in profitable jurisdictions, income offset by fully valued net operating losses, the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions and benefits from certain foreign tax planning.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company has established a Disclosure Controls Committee that assists the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer in their evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 13a-15(e), are (i) effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
| | |
| | (i) | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company, |
|
| | |
| | (ii) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and |
|
| | |
| | (iii) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls may deteriorate.
The Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of ourits internal control over financial reporting based upon the 1992 framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that ourthe Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.2013.
The Company's effectiveness of ourits internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, has been audited by Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA/Reviseurs d'Entreprises SCCRL, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included immediately below.
WABCO Holdings Inc.
February 15, 201313, 2014
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of WABCO Holdings Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) (the COSO criteria). WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of WABCO Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, / (loss),cash flows and cash flowsshareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122013 and our report dated February 15, 201313, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA/Reviseurs d'Entreprises SCCRL
Represented by:
/s/ Harry Everaerts,Piet Hemschoote, Partner
Brussels, Belgium
February 15, 201313, 2014
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
| |
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Pursuant to instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by Item 10 with respect to the Directors of the Company set forth under the heading “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and “Directors” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 10 with respect to the executive officers of the Company has been included in Part I of this Form 10-K (as Item 4A) under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in reliance on Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K and Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
Pursuant to instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning the Audit Committee and audit committee financial expert disclosure set forth under the headings “Governance - Board Matters and Committee Membership” and “- Committees of the Board - Audit Committee” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
Pursuant to instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 by officers and directors of the Company set forth under the heading “Certain Relationships or Related Person Transactions and Section 16 Reporting Compliance - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our Code of Conduct and Ethics set forth under the caption “Code of Conduct and Ethics” in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning director and officer executive compensation and related matters set forth under the headings “Report of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
Pursuant to instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning compensation committee interlocks and insider participation set forth under the headings “Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning shares of common stock of the Company beneficially owned by management set forth under the heading “Common Stock Ownership of Officers, Directors and Significant Shareholders” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans set forth under the heading “Equity Compensation Plans” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning certain relationships and related party transactions and director independence set forth under the headings “Certain Relationships or Related Person Transactions and
Section 16 Reporting Compliance - Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” and “Governance - Independence Standards
for Board Service” and “- Availability“Availability of Corporate Governance Materials” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information concerning principal accounting fees and services set forth under the heading “Audit Committee Matters - Audit Committee's Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” and “- Audit“Audit and Non-Audit Fees” in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
| |
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
| |
| (a) | 1. and 2. Financial statements and financial statement schedules |
The financial statements and financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on the following page are incorporated herein by reference.
(b) The exhibits to this Report are listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference or are file as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
| | |
| | | Page No. |
| | | |
| 1 | Financial Statements: | |
| | | |
| | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| | | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Operations for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 | |
| | | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 | |
| | | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 | |
| | | |
| | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 | |
| | | |
| | Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 | |
| | | |
| | Notes to Financial Statements | |
| | | |
| 2 | Financial statement schedule, years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 | |
| | | |
| | Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | |
All other schedules have been omitted because the information is not applicable or is not material or because the information required is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011, and 20102011
(Amounts in thousands)
| | | Description | | Balance Beginning of Period | | Adjustments to Amounts Provided in Prior Years | | Deductions | | Foreign Currency Translation Effects | | Balance End of Period | | Balance Beginning of Period | | Adjustments to Amounts Provided in Prior Years | | Deductions | | | Foreign Currency Translation Effects | | Balance End of Period |
| 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve deducted from assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable | | | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 1,346 |
| | $ | (66 | ) | (A) | | $ | 138 |
| | $ | 4,999 |
|
| 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve deducted from assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable | | $ | 3,425 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | (314 | ) | (A) | | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 3,425 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | (314 | ) | (A) | | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
|
| 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve deducted from assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable | | $ | 7,706 |
| | $ | (424 | ) | | $ | (3,840 | ) | (A) | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | 3,425 |
| | $ | 7,706 |
| | $ | (424 | ) | | $ | (3,840 | ) | (A) | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | 3,425 |
|
| 2010: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve deducted from assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable | | $ | 9,305 |
| | $ | (315 | ) | | $ | (645 | ) | (A) | | $ | (639 | ) | | $ | 7,706 |
| |
(A) Accounts charged off
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WABCO HOLDINGS INC.
By: /s/ Jacques Esculier
Jacques Esculier
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | |
| Signatures | Title | Date |
| | | |
| /s/ Jacques Esculier | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Jacques Esculier | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | | |
/s/ Ulrich MichelJason Campbell | Interim Chief Financial Officer | February 15, 2013 |
Ulrich Michel | (Principal Financial Officer) | |
| | |
/s/ Todd Weinblatt | Vice President and Controller | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
Todd WeinblattJason Campbell | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Jean-Paul L. Montupet | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| G. Peter D'Aloia | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| John F. Fiedler | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Dr. Juergen Gromer | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Mary Petrovich | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Kenneth J. Martin | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Michael T. Smith | | |
| | | |
| * | Director | February 15, 201313, 2014 |
| Donald J. Stebbins | | |
* Signed by Attorney-in-fact
|
|
| /s/ Vincent Pickering |
Vincent Pickering Attorney-in-fact |
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(The File Number of the Registrant, WABCO Holdings Inc., is 1-33332)
Certain of the following exhibits, designated with an asterisk (*) are filed herewith. The exhibits not so designated have been previously filed by the registrant with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference to the documents indicated in brackets, following the descriptions of such exhibits.
|
| |
| Exhibit No. | Description |
| 2.1 | Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2007, by and between Trane Inc. and WABCO Holdings Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 20, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 18, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of WABCO Holdings Inc.* (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference) |
| | |
| 4.1 | Rights Agreement, dated July 16, 2007, by and between WABCO Holdings Inc. and The Bank of New York (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 18, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 4.2 | Certificate of Designation of Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 18, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 4.3 | Rights Certificate (attached as an exhibit to the Rights Agreement, dated July 16, 2007, previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 18, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference).
|
| | |
| 4.4 | Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate (previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.1 | Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2007, by and among Trane Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries and WABCO Holdings Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 20, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.2 | Employee Matters Agreement, dated July 16, 2007, by and between Trane Inc. and WABCO Holdings Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 20, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.3 | Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2007, by and among Trane Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries and WABCO Holdings Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 20, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.4 | WABCO Holdings Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form S-8 (File No. 333-144906), filed on July 27, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.5 | Amendment to WABCO Holdings Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 17, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.6 | WABCO Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit BC to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-33332), filed on April 17, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
10.7 | Amendment to WABCO Holdings Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 17, 20129, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
|
| |
10.810.7 | Form of Indemnification Agreement for executive officers and members of the Board of Directors (previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 10, as amended (File No. 001-33332), filed on May 23, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.910.8 | Form of WABCO Holdings Inc. Stock Option Grant Agreement for U.S. Employees (previously filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.1010.9 | Form of WABCO Holdings Inc. Stock Option Grant Agreement for Non-U.S. Employees (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.1110.10 | Form of WABCO Holdings Inc. Restricted Unit Grant Agreement for U.S. Employees (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.1210.11 | Form of WABCO Holdings Inc. Restricted Unit Grant Agreement for Non-U.S. Employees (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.1310.12 | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 28, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
| 10.13 | Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement for Directors (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 26, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
|
| | |
| 10.14 | WABCO Holdings Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.15 | Amendment No. 1 to WABCO Holdings Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan, (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's 8-K (File no. 001-33332), filed on July 14, 2008 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.16 | Amendment No. 2 to WABCO Holdings Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan, effective as of December 31, 2008 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 24, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.17 | Amendment No. 3 to WABCO Holdings Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan, effective as of January 1, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 17, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.18 | Amendment No. 4 to WABCO Holdings Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan, effective as of November 30, 2012.*2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.19 | WABCO Holdings Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form S-8 (File No. 333-148972), filed on January 31, 2008 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.20 | Amendment to WABCO Holdings Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 31, 2008 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 24, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.21 | WABCO Holdings Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on November 8, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.22 | Amendment to WABCO Holdings Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan, effective as of December 31, 2008 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 24, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| | |
|
| |
| 10.23 | Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Program for Belgian Executives (Summary of French Language Program Document) (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on May 7, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
|
| |
| 10.24 | Partnership Agreement, dated as of January 9, 1990, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated as of May 29, 1990, and Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated as of May 10, 2006, of Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems (formerly known as Rockwell WABCO Vehicle Control Systems), by and between WABCO Automotive Control Systems, Inc. and ArvinMeritor Brake Holdings, LLC (successor in interest to Rockwell Brake Systems, Inc.) (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10 (File No. 001-33332), filed on May 23, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.25 | German Receivables Purchase and Servicing Agreement dated September 23, 2009, among WABCO Fahrzeugsysteme GmbH, as German Seller and German Servicer, WABCO Financial Services SPRL, as Seller's Agent, and Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V., as Purchaser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on September 28, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.26 | Italian Receivables Purchase and Servicing Agreement dated September 23, 2009, among WABCO Automotive Italia SRL, as Italian Seller and Italian Servicer, WABCO Financial Services SPRL, as Seller's Agent, and Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V., as Purchaser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on September 28, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.27 | French Receivables Purchase and Servicing Agreement dated September 23, 2009, among WABCO Financial Services SPRL, as Seller's Agent, WABCO France S.A.S., as French Seller, Paris Titrisation, as Management Company, and Société Générale, as Custodian (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on September 28, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.28 | Master Definitions Agreement dated September 23, 2009, among Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V., as Senior Units Subscriber, the Bank or the Purchaser, as applicable, Paris Titrisation, as Management Company acting for the account of FCT Val Duchesse-Titrisation, Société Générale, as the Administrative Agent or Custodian, as applicable, Antalis S.A., WABCO France S.A.S., as French Seller, WABCO Fahrzeugsysteme GmbH, as German Seller, WABCO Automotive Italia SRL, as Italian Seller, WABCO Financial Services SPRL, as Depositor and the Seller's Agent, and WABCO Europe SPRL, as Insurance Servicer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on September 28, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.29 | Guarantee and Subordination Agreement dated September 23, 2009, among WABCO Holdings Inc., as Guarantor, Paris Titrisation, as Management Company, Société Générale, as Custodian and Société Générale Bank Nederland N.V., as Purchaser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on September 28, 2009 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.30 | $400,000,000 Facility Agreement, dated July 8, 2011, for WABCO Holdings Inc. arranged by Banc of America Securities Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., ING Belgium SN/NV, Societe Generale Corporate & Investment Banking, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD., The Royal Bank of Scotland NV, (Belgium) Branch, and Credit Lyonnais and Unicredit Bank AG, with Banc of America Securities Limited acting as agent (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on July 11, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.31 | ManagementAmendment Letter, dated August 23, 2013, to the $400,000,000 Facility Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19,July 8, 2011, for WABCO Holdings Inc. arranged by Banc of America Securities Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., ING Belgium SN/NV, Société Générale Corporate & Investment Banking, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD., The Royal Bank of Scotland NV, (Belgium) Branch, and betweenCredit Lyonnais and Unicredit Bank AG, with Banc of America Securities Limited acting as agent (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the CompanyCompany’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on August 26, 2013 and Jacques Esculier.*herein incorporated by reference).
|
| | |
| 10.32 | Management Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19, 2011, by and between the Company and Nikhil Varty.*Jacques Esculier (previously filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
|
| |
| 10.33 | Management Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19, 2011, by and between the Company and Kevin Tarrant.*Nikhil Varty (previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.34 | Management Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19, 2011, by and between the Company and Ulrich Michel.*Kevin Tarrant (previously filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.35 | Management Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19, 2011, by and between the Company and Jean-Christophe Figueroa.*Ulrich Michel (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 10.36 | Management Agreement, effective January 1, 2012 dated December 19, 2011, by and between the Company and Jean-Christophe Figueroa (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
| 10.37 | Letter from the Company to Nikhil Varty, dated November 12, 2012. * |
| 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
| 10.37 | First Amendment to Management Agreement, dated December 30, 2012 entered into by and between the Company and Nikhil Varty.*Varty (previously filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
10.38 | |
| 10.39 | First Amendment to Management Agreement, dated December 30, 2012 entered into by and between the Company and Kevin Tarrant.*Tarrant (previously filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
10.3910.40 | First Amendment to Offer Letter dated November 12, 2012 from the Company to Nikhil Varty.Varty (previously filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on February 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
| 10.41 | Description of Agreement with Kevin Tarrant Relating to Equity Awards (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33332), filed on April 25, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| |
| 10.42 | Offer letter from the Company to Jason Campbell, dated March 11, 2013. * |
| |
| 10.43 | International Assignment Letter from WABCO Expats Inc. to Jason Campbell, dated May 23, 2013. * |
| | |
| 16.1 | Letter from Ernst & Young LLP dated August 2, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company's 8-K (File No. 001-33332), filed on August 2, 2007 and herein incorporated by reference). |
| | |
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Company.* |
| | |
| 23.1 | Consent of Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA/Réviseurs d'Entreprises SCCRL.* |
| | |
| 24.1 | Powers of Attorney (G. Peter D'Aloia, John F. Fiedler, Dr. Juergen Gromer, Kenneth J. Martin, Mary Petrovich, Michael T. Smith, Donald J. Stebbins and Jean-Paul L. Montupet).* |
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
| 32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
|
| |
| 32.2 | Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
| 101 | The following financial information from WABCO Holdings, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012,2013, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013,13, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.+ |
+ Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings
