Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-33776
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware98-0526415
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. employer identification number)
111 Robert-Bourassa BoulevardSuite 5000; Montréal, Quebec; 5000MontrealQuebecCanadaH3C 2M1
(Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)
(514) 875-2160
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share RFP
New York Stock Exchange

Toronto Stock Exchange
(Title of class) (Trading Symbol)(Name of exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes þ    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes ¨    No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ    No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes þ    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer    
Accelerated FilerNon-accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company   Emerging Growth Company
Large accelerated filer    ¨
Accelerated filer    þ
Non-accelerated filer    ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company   ¨
Emerging growth company    ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes  ¨    No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2017)2020) was approximately $259 million.$118 million.
As of January 31, 2018,29, 2021, there were 90,196,72080,813,619 shares of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2017,2020, are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.





Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND USE OF
THIRD-PARTY DATA
Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“(or, “Form 10-K”10-K) that are not reported financial results or other historical information of Resolute Forest Products Inc. (with its subsidiaries, and affiliates, either individually or collectively, unless otherwise indicated, referred to as “Resolute Forest Products,” “Resolute,” “we,” “our,” “us”“us,” or the “Company”) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They include, for example, statements relating to the impact of the novel coronavirus (or, “COVID-19”) pandemic and resulting economic conditions on our business, results of operations and market price of our securities, and to our: efforts and initiatives to reduce costs and increase revenues and profitability; business and operating outlook; future pension funding obligations; assessment of market conditions; growth strategies and prospects, and the growth potential of the Company and the industry in which we operate; liquidity; future cash flows, including as a result of the changes to our pension funding obligations; estimated capital expenditures; and strategies for achieving our goals generally, including the strategies described in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Our Business,” of this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “may,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “attempt,” “project”“project,” “estimate,” “guide,” “strive,” “continue,” “create,” “plan,” “see,” “seek,” “improve,” “move,” “position,” “build,” “grow,” “pursue,” and other terms with similar meaning indicating possible future events or potential impact on our business or Resolute Forest Products’ shareholders.
The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on management’s current assumptions, beliefs, and expectations, all of which involve a number of business risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future financial condition, results of operations, and performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this Form 10-K include, but are not limited to, the impact of: the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and resulting economic conditions, developments in non-print media, including changes in consumer habits, and the effectiveness of our responses to these developments; intense competition in the forest products industry; any inability to offer products certified to globally recognized forestry management and chain of custody standards; any inability to successfully implement our strategies to increase our earnings power; the possible failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses with ours or to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, such as Atlas Paper Holdings Inc.our entry into wood manufacturing in the U.S., and its subsidiaries (“Atlas Tissue”),tissue production and sales, or divestitures or other strategic transactions or projects, such as our Calhoun (Tennessee) tissue operations;projects; uncertainty or changes in political or economic conditions in the United States,U.S., Canada or other countries in which we manufacture or sell our products; global economic conditions; the highly cyclical nature of the forest products industry; any difficulties in obtaining timber or wood fiber at favorable prices, or at all; changes in the cost of purchased energy and other raw materials; physical, financial and financialregulatory risks associated with global, regional, and local weather conditions, and climate conditions and change; any disruption in operations or increased labor costs due to labor disputes; difficulties in our employee relations, attraction or retention; disruptions to our supply chain, operations, or the delivery of our products; disruptions to our information technology systems including cybersecurity risks;and privacy incidents; risks related to the operation and transition of legacy system applications; negative publicity, even if unjustified; currency fluctuations; any increase in the level of required contributions to our pension plans, including as a result of any increase in the amount by which they are underfunded; our ability to maintain adequate capital resources to provide for all of our substantial capital requirements; the terms of our outstanding indebtedness, which could restrict our current and future operations; the replacement of the London Interbank Offered Rate (or, the “LIBOR”) with an alternative interest rate; losses that are not covered by insurance; any additional closure costs and long-lived asset or goodwill impairment or accelerated depreciation charges; any need to record additional valuation allowances against our recorded deferred income tax assets; our exports from one country to another country becoming or remaining subject to duties, cash deposit requirements, border taxes, quotas, or other trade remedies or restrictions; countervailing orand anti-dumping duties on imports to the U.S. of our paper products and substantially allthe vast majority of our softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian mills;sawmills; any failure to comply with laws or regulations generally; any additional environmental or health and safety liabilities; any violation of trade laws, export controls, or other laws relating to our international sales and operations; adverse outcomes of legal proceedings, orclaims and governmental inquiries, investigations, and other disputes in which we are involved; the actions of holders of a significant percentage of our common stock; and the potential risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.Factors,which have been heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic, including related governmental responses and economic impacts, market disruptions and resulting changes in consumer habits.
All forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K are expressly qualified by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section and in our other filings with the United StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”(or, the “SEC) and the Canadian securities regulatory authorities. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
1

Table of Contents
Market and Industry Data
The information on industry and general economic conditions in this Form 10-K was derived from third-party sources and trade publications we believe to be widely accepted and accurate. We have not independently verified the information and cannot assure you of its accuracy.

2

Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
We are a global leader in the forest products industry with a diverse range of products, including market pulp, tissue, wood products, newsprint and specialty papers.paper. We own or operate some 40 pulp, paper, tissue and wood products facilities, as well as power generation assets in the United StatesU.S. and Canada. Marketing our products in close to 70over 50 countries, we have third-party certified 100% of our managed woodlands to at least one of two internationally recognized forest management standards.standard.
Resolute Forest Products Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed on January 25, 2007, from the merger of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (“Abitibi”) and Bowater Incorporated. Our common stock trades under the stock symbol “RFP” on both the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”(or, the “NYSE) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”(or, the “TSX).
Information About our Executive Officers
The following is information about our executive officers as of March 1, 2018:
2021:
NameAgePositionOfficer SinceNameAgePositionOfficer Since
Yves Laflamme61President and Chief Executive Officer2007
Steve Boniferro61Senior Vice President, Human Resources2016
Jo-Ann Longworth57Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2011
Remi G. LalondeRemi G. Lalonde44President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer2018
Lori KilgourLori Kilgour50Senior Vice President, Process Improvement and Chief Information Officer2019
John LafaveJohn Lafave56Senior Vice President, Pulp and Paper Sales and Marketing2018
Patrice Minguez54President, Tissue Group2017Patrice Minguez57President, Tissue Group2017
Daniel OuelletDaniel Ouellet50Senior Vice President, Human Resources2018
Hugues SimonHugues Simon50President, Wood Products2021
Richard Tremblay54Senior Vice President, Pulp and Paper Group2014Richard Tremblay57Senior Vice President, Pulp and Paper Operations2014
Jacques P. Vachon58Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Chief Legal Officer2007Jacques P. Vachon61Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Chief Legal Officer2007
Sylvain A. GirardSylvain A. Girard50Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (as of March 2, 2021)2021
Mr. Laflamme previously served as senior vice president, wood products, global procurement and information technology, from January 2011 to January 2018, as senior vice president, wood products, from October 2007 to January 2011, as senior vice president, woodlands and sawmills of Abitibi from 2006 to October 2007, and as vice president, sales, marketing and value-added wood products operations of Abitibi from 2004 to 2005.
Mr. Boniferro previously served as vice president, human resources, Ontario operations and project lead strategic organization, from May 2014 to May 2016. Prior to joining Resolute Forest Products, he served as senior vice president, human resources at Catalyst Paper from January 2008 to May 2014 and as vice president, human resources at Algoma Steel from May 1997 to January 2008. Mr. Boniferro also served as staff representative and area coordinator (Northwestern Ontario) for the United Steelworkers Union from May 1988 to May 1997.
Ms. Longworth previously served as special advisor to the formerLalonde became president and chief executive officer focusing on special mandates, from July 2011as of March 1, 2021, after Yves Laflamme stepped down and retired. Mr. Lalonde will cease to August 2011. Priorbe chief financial officer upon the appointment of Sylvain Girard to joining Resolute Forest Products, shethis role as of March 2, 2021. Mr. Lalonde previously served as senior vice president and chief accounting officer with World Color Inc. (formerly Quebecor World Inc.) from 2008 to 2010, as chief financial officer with Skyservice Inc. from 2007November 2018 to 2008,March 1, 2021, and was vice president, strategy and corporate development from May 2018 to November 2018. He was general manager of Resolute’s pulp and paper mill in Thunder Bay (Ontario), from February 2016 to May 2018. Before taking a leadership role in operations, Mr. Lalonde was treasurer and vice president, investor relations, from November 2014 to February 2016, and vice president, investor relations, from September 2011 to November 2014. He initially joined Resolute in 2009 as senior legal counsel, securities, following six years at a Wall Street law firm.
Ms. Kilgour previously served as vice president, information technology, from July 2017 to May 2019, as vice president and controllerprogram director from July 2015 to July 2017, and as vice president, operational excellence, engineering and energy, from January 2013 to July 2015. Prior to joining Resolute in 2013, she worked at Tembec, Verso Corporation/International Paper and Catalyst.
Mr. Lafave previously served as vice president, sales, national accounts – paper sales, vice-president, sales, national accounts – newsprint, vice president, sales, national accounts – commercial printers, and executive sales representative from 2003 to 2009. Prior to joining Resolute, he held progressive positions in sales with Novelis, Inc. from 2005 to 2006,UPM-Kymmene and held a number of financial and operational roles over a 16-year career with Alcan Inc.Repap Enterprises.
Mr. Minguez previously served as special advisor to the former president and chief executive officer.officer in July 2017. Prior to joining Resolute in August 2017, he was founder and former president of Cellynne Holdings, Inc., a tissue business, from January 1989 to August 2012. From September 1986February 1987 to January 1989, Mr. Minguez headed SAS,Société Antillaise de Service SARL, a distribution company he founded, specializing in janitorial supplies and proprietary systems.
Mr. Ouellet previously served as vice president, human resources, for Resolute’s Canadian and U.S. operations, from January 2016 to May 2018, and as vice president, human resources, for its Canadian operations, from November 2013 to January 2016. He held a range of other human resources positions since joining Resolute in September 2000, and also acquired operational experience leading the Company’s sawmill operations in the Saguenay – Lac-Saint-Jean region of Quebec. Prior to joining Resolute, Mr. Ouellet worked with Alliance Forest Products, Alcan, and a regional trade union.
Mr. Simon previously served as a special advisor to the senior vice president and chief financial officer from January 4, 2021 to March 1, 2021. Prior to joining Resolute in 2021, he was president of BarretteWood Inc., from July 2016 to November 2020,
3

Table of Contents
and served as vice president, sales and procurement for BarretteWood Inc. from August 2012 to July 2016. He also served as vice president sales and marketing and value added operations of Resolute wood products and a range of other positions with Resolute and its predecessor companies, from 1999 to 2012.
Mr. Tremblay previously served as senior vice president, pulp and paper group, from June 2015 to February 2018, and as senior vice president, pulp and paper operations, from February 2014 to May 2015. He served as interim senior vice president, pulp and paper operations, from November 2013 to January 2014, and as vice president, pulp and paper operations from June 2011 to October 2013. Prior to joining Resolute Forest Products in June 2011, he served as general manager of several mills at Smurfit Stone Container Corporation between 2002 and 2011.
Mr. Vachon previously served as senior vice president and chief legal officer from January 2011 to February 2012, as senior vice president, corporate affairs and chief legal officer from October 2007 to January 2011, and as senior vice president, corporate affairs and secretary, of Abitibi from 1997 to October 2007.
Our The Company announced the appointment of Sylvain A. Girard as the Company’s next senior vice president and chief financial officer, effective March 2, 2021. Mr. Girard joined Resolute as special advisor to Remi G. Lalonde, on February 15, 2021. Mr. Girard most recently served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. from 2016 to 2020. Previously, he held senior executive positions in finance with SNC-Lavalin, following 22 years with General Electric Company (or, “GE”). He held a number of positions at GE, including 14 years as chief financial officer in the financial and healthcare sectors of GE in Europe.
Products
We manage our business based on the products we manufacture. Our reportable segments correspond to our principal product lines: market pulp, tissue, wood products, and paper. As of the second quarter of 2020, the results from our newsprint and specialty papers. Certain segmentpapers operations have been combined to form the paper reportable segment. This better reflects management’s internal analysis, given the diminishing percentage newsprint and geographical financial information, including sales by segment and by geographic area, operating income (loss) by segment and long-lived assets by

geographic area, can be foundspecialty papers represent in Note 20, “Segment Information” to our consolidated financial statements and related notes (“Consolidated Financial Statements”) appearing in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Form 10-K.product portfolio.
Market pulp
We produce market pulp at sevenfive facilities in North America, with total capacity of approximately 1.71.3 million metric tons, or approximately 10%8% of total North American capacity, making us the third largestcapacity. Our market pulp producer in North America.includes virgin pulp and recycled bleached kraft (or, “RBK”) pulp, for which we are a leading global producer. Approximately 75%80% of our virgin pulp capacity is softwood-based: northern bleached softwood kraft (“NBSK”(or, “NBSK) pulp, southern bleached softwood kraft (“SBSK”(or, “SBSK) pulp, and fluff pulp. We are also the world’s largest producerThe remainder of recycled bleached kraft (“RBK”)our virgin pulp and a competitive producercapacity consists of northern bleached hardwood kraft (“NBHK”(or, “NBHK) pulp and southern bleached hardwood kraft (“SBHK”(or, “SBHK) pulp. Wood pulp is the most commonly used material to make paper and tissue. Pulp not converted into paper or tissue is sold as market pulp, which is used to make a range of consumer products including tissue, packaging, specialty paper products, diapers, and other absorbent products. Approximately 28%23% of our 20172020 market pulp shipments were exported outside of North America, including significant exports to Europe, Asia, and Latin America.
Tissue
We produce tissue products at three facilities in North America, located in Florida and Tennessee.America. With total capacity of 128,000 short tons (116,000 metric tons), which includes our new tissue machine at our facility in Calhoun, we are a fully integrated manufacturer operating four tissue machines and 1413 converting lines.lines, including the converting facility in Hagerstown, Maryland, that we acquired in December 2020. We manufacture a range of tissue products for the away-from-home and at-homeretail markets, including recycled and virgin paper products, covering premium, value, and economy grades. We also sell parent rolls not converted into tissue products.
Wood products
We operateown 14 sawmills in Canada that produce construction-grade lumber sold in North America. On February 1, 2020, we completed the acquisition of three sawmills in the U.S. South, bringing our number of sawmills to 17. The three sawmills have a combined production capacity of 550 million board feet once ramped-up. For more information, see Note 3, “Business Acquisition,” to our consolidated financial statements and related notes (or, “Consolidated Financial Statements”) appearing in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Form 10-K.
Our Canadian sawmills produce dimension spruce-pine-fir lumber and provide wood chips to our pulp and paper mills in Canada. Our sawmills also supply wood residue to our other segments, to be used as fuel to produce electricity and steam based on renewable sources. Our U.S. sawmills produce dimension lumber and decking from southern yellow pine. In 2017,2020, we shipped 1.9 billion board feet of construction-grade lumber.lumber and decking. We also operate two remanufactured wood products facilities that manufacture bed frame components, finger joints, and furring strips, two engineered wood products facilities that manufacture I-joists for the construction industry, and one wood pellet facility, all of which are located in Quebec and Ontario.
Newsprint
4

Table of Contents
Paper
We produce a wide range of papers at 10 mills strategically located to serve major markets, with total capacity of 2.1 million metric tons. We are a leading global producer of newsprint at eightand the largest producer of uncoated mechanical papers in North America.
We own six newsprint facilities in North America. WithAmerica, with total capacity of approximately 1.81.4 million metric tons, which represents approximately 8%9% of total worldwide capacity and approximately 43%44% of total North American capacity, we are the largest producer of newsprint in the world.capacity. We sell newsprint to newspaper publishers worldwide and also to commercial printers in North America for uses such as inserts and flyers. In 2017,2020, North American deliveries represented 62%65% of our total newsprint shipments.
Specialty papers
We produce specialty papers at sixfour facilities in North America. With total capacity of approximately 1.2 million short tons (1.10.7 million metric tons),tons, our specialty papers segment is composed ofcomprise uncoated mechanical papers, including supercalendered (“SC”) paper and white paper, as well as coated mechanical papers and uncoated freesheet papers. With 724,000 short tons (657,000 metric tons) of capacity, or approximately 22%26% of total North American capacity, we are the largest producer of uncoated mechanical papers in North America, and the fourth largest in the world. Also, with 345,000 short tons (313,000 metric tons) of capacity, or approximately 14% of total North American capacity, we are North America’s third largest producer of coated mechanical papers. Our specialty papers are used in books, retail inserts, direct mail, coupons, magazines, catalogs, bags and other commercial printing applications. We sell specialty papers to major commercial printers, direct mailers, publishers, catalogers and retailers, mostly in North America.
For additional information on our corporate strategy, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Our Business” of this Form 10-K.
Pulp, tissue, and paper manufacturing facilities
The following table lists the pulp, tissue, and paper manufacturing facilities and the number of paper and tissue machines we owned or operated as of December 31, 2017, excluding facilities and machines that have been permanently closed or indefinitely idled as of December 31, 2017.2020. The table presents our total 20172020 production by product line (which represents all of our reportable segments except wood products), reflecting the impact of any downtime taken in 2017,2020, and our 2018

2021 capacity.Total capacity is based on an operating schedule of approximately 360 days. In certain cases, production can exceed capacity, due to changes in the manufacturing properties of the product.
 Number of Machines201820172017 Production By Product Line
(In thousands of metric tons)
Total
Capacity
Total
Production
Market
Pulp
TissueNewsprint
Specialty
Papers
Canada             
Alma (Quebec) (1)
3360
 284
 
 
 
 284
 
Amos (Quebec)1195
 196
 
 
 196
 
 
Baie-Comeau (Quebec)2321
 274
 
 
 274
 
 
Clermont (Quebec) (2)
1223
 221
 
 
 221
 
 
Dolbeau (Quebec)1142
 140
 
 
 
 140
 
Gatineau (Quebec)1196
 196
 
 
 196
 
 
Kénogami (Quebec)1134
 122
 
 
 
 122
 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec)340
 325
 325
 
 
 
 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)1535
 505
 314
 
 180
 11
 
United States             
Augusta (Georgia)1218
 199
 
 
 199
 
 
Calhoun (Tennessee) (3) (4)
2391
 277
 129
 21
 
 127
 
Catawba (South Carolina) (5)
1546
 501
 209
 
 
 292
 
Coosa Pines (Alabama)268
 263
 263
 
 
 
 
Fairmont (West Virginia)218
 138
 138
 
 
 
 
Grenada (Mississippi)1231
 229
 
 
 229
 
 
Hialeah (Florida)231
 29
 
 29
 
 
 
Menominee (Michigan)178
 122
 122
 
 
 
 
Sanford (Florida)125
 22
 
 22
 
 
 
Usk (Washington) (6)
1226
 222
 
 
 222
 
 
Other             
Permanently closed facilities and paper machines (7)
   341
 
 
 110
 231
 
 204,778
 4,606
 1,500
 72
 1,827
 1,207
 
(1)
On October 16, 2017, we restarted a paper machine in Alma, representing approximately 75,000 metric tons of specialty papers capacity.
(2)
On December 21, 2017, we acquired the 49% equity interest held by The New York Times Company in Donohue Malbaie Inc. We already owned 51% of the shares of Donohue Malbaie Inc. The amounts in the above table represent the mill’s total capacity and production.
(3)
On February 28, 2017, we started a tissue machine at our Calhoun facility.
(4)
On September 30, 2017, we permanently closed two paper machines in Calhoun, representing approximately 255,000 metric tons of specialty papers capacity and 80,000 metric tons of newsprint capacity.
(5)
On June 30, 2017, we permanently closed a paper machine in Catawba, representing approximately 190,000 metric tons of specialty papers capacity.
(6)
Ponderay Newsprint Company is located in Usk and is an unconsolidated partnership in which we have a 40% interest. The amounts in the above table represent the mill’s total capacity and production.
(7)
In 2017, we permanently closed paper machines in Calhoun and Catawba, as well as our paper mill in Mokpo (South Korea). For additional information, see Note 4, “Closure Costs, Impairment and Other Related Charges,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Number of Machines202120202020 Production By Product Line
(In thousands of metric tons)Total
Capacity
Total
Production
Market
Pulp
TissuePaper
Canada
Alma (Quebec)3341 253 — — 253 
Amos (Quebec)1194 59 — — 59 
Baie-Comeau (Quebec)2336 58 — — 58 
Clermont (Quebec)1221 219 — — 219 
Dolbeau (Quebec)1137 112 — — 112 
Gatineau (Quebec)1197 190 — — 190 
Kénogami (Quebec)1132 121 — — 121 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec)1369 365 365 — — 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)2530 495 306 — 189 
U.S.
Calhoun (Tennessee)3356 307 128 49 130 
Coosa Pines (Alabama)1264 256 256 — — 
Grenada (Mississippi)1229 204 — — 204 
Hialeah (Florida)231 22 — 22 — 
Menominee (Michigan)1170 112 112 — — 
Sanford (Florida)125 24 — 24 — 
 223,532 2,797 1,167 95 1,535 
Wood products facilities
The following table lists the sawmills we owned or operated as of December 31, 2017, excluding facilities that have been permanently closed as of December 31, 2017.2020. The table presents our total 20172020 production, reflecting the impact of any downtime taken in 2017,2020, and our 20182021 mechanical capacity. We do not have access to
5

Table of Contents
enough timber to operate mostall of the sawmills at their total mechanical capacity. Total capacity is based on an operating schedule of approximately 355 days.
20212020
(In million board feet)Total CapacityTotal Production
Canada
Atikokan (Ontario)145 139 
Comtois (Quebec)145 47 
Girardville (Quebec)220 214 
Ignace (Ontario)115 — 
La Doré (Quebec)198 225 
La Tuque (Quebec) (1)
186 101 
Maniwaki (Quebec)204 96 
Mistassini (Quebec)209 203 
Obedjiwan (Quebec) (2)
65 47 
Pointe-aux-Outardes (Quebec)184 109 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec)174 105 
Saint-Thomas (Quebec)93 35 
Senneterre (Quebec)167 139 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)330 277 
U.S. (3)
Cross city (Florida)185 128 
El Dorado (Arkansas) (4)
180 
Glenwood (Arkansas)185 98 
 2,985 1,966 
  2018 2017
(In million board feet) Total Capacity Total Production
Atikokan (Ontario) 145
  107
 
Comtois (Quebec) 145
  119
 
Girardville (Quebec) 220
  220
 
Ignace (Ontario) 115
  79
 
La Doré (Quebec) 198
  198
 
La Tuque (Quebec) (1)
 175
  90
 
Maniwaki (Quebec) 204
  111
 
Mistassini (Quebec) 203
  200
 
Obedjiwan (Quebec) (2)
 65
  49
 
Pointe-aux-Outardes (Quebec) 175
  123
 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec) 174
  149
 
Saint-Thomas (Quebec) 93
  61
 
Senneterre (Quebec) 155
  121
 
Thunder Bay (Ontario) 302
  294
 
  2,369
  1,921
 
(1)Forest Products Mauricie L.P. is located in La Tuque and is a consolidated subsidiary in which we have a 93.2% interest. The amounts in the above table represent the sawmill’s total capacity and production.
(1)
(2)Sociéte en Commandite Scierie Opitciwan is located in Obedjiwan and is an unconsolidated entity in which we have a 45% interest. The amounts in the above table represent the sawmill’s total capacity and production.
(3)On February 1, 2020, we acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. all of the equity securities and membership interests in certain of its subsidiaries, the business of which consists mainly in the operation of three sawmills and related assets in Cross City and in Glenwood and El Dorado, with combined production capacity of 550 million board feet. When operating to capacity, almost 25% of our lumber production will be in the U.S. South. For more information, see Note 3, “Business Acquisition,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)The El Dorado mill, which was already idled at the time of the acquisition, was restarted in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Forest Products Mauricie L.P. is located in La Tuque and is a consolidated subsidiary in which we have a 93.2% interest. The amounts in the above table represent the mill’s total capacity and production.
(2)
Sociéte en Commandite Scierie Opitciwan is located in Obedjiwan and is an unconsolidated entity in which we have a 45% interest. The amounts in the above table represent the mill’s total capacity and production.
The following table lists the remanufactured wood, engineered wood, and wood pellet products facilities we owned or operated as of December 31, 2017,2020, and their respective 20182021 capacity and 20172020 production. Total capacity is based on an operating schedule of approximately 355 days.
20212020
(In million board feet, except where otherwise stated)Total CapacityTotal Production
Remanufactured Wood Products Facilities
Château-Richer (Quebec)66 40 
La Doré (Quebec)16 14 
Total Remanufactured Wood Products Facilities82 54 
Engineered Wood Products Facilities
Larouche and Saint-Prime (Quebec) (in million linear feet) (1)
145 134 
Wood Pellet Products Facility
Thunder Bay (Ontario) (in thousands of metric tons)45 41 
(1)Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc. and Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership are located in Larouche and Saint-Prime, respectively, and are unconsolidated entities in which we have a 50% interest in
6

Table of Contents
  2018 2017
(In million board feet, except where otherwise stated) Total Capacity Total Production
Remanufactured Wood Products Facilities      
Château-Richer (Quebec) 66
  45
 
La Doré (Quebec) 16
  14
 
Total Remanufacturing Wood Facilities 82
  59
 
Engineered Wood Products Facilities      
Larouche and Saint-Prime (Quebec) (in million linear feet) (1)
 145
  104
 
Wood Pellet Products Facility      
Thunder Bay (Ontario) (in thousands of metric tons) 45
  39
 
each entity. We operate the facilities and our joint venture partner sells the products. The amounts in the above table represent the mills’ total capacity and production.
(1)
Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc. and Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership are located in Larouche and Saint-Prime, respectively, and are unconsolidated entities in which we have a 50% interest in each entity. We operate the facilities and our joint venture partners sell the products. The amounts in the above table represent the mills’ total capacity and production.
Other products
We also sell green power produced from renewable sources wood chips and other wood relatedwood-related products to customers located in Canada and the United States.U.S. Sales of these other products are considered a recovery of the cost of manufacturing our primary products.

We also have a 49% interest in Serres Toundra Inc., a joint venture that produces vegetables from 19 hectares of greenhouses adjacent to our Saint-Félicien pulp mill. The greenhouses source a portion of their heat from our Saint-Félicien pulp mill and are also expected to source a portion of their CO2 requirements from such mill by the end of 2021.
Raw Materials
In the manufacture of our paper, tissue, pulp, and wood products, our operations consume substantial amounts of raw materials such as wood chemicals, and recovered paper (primarily sorted office paper),chemicals, as well as energy. We purchase raw materials and energy sources (to complement internal generation) primarily on the open market. These raw materials are market-priced commodities and as such, are subject to fluctuations in market prices. For additional information about commodity price risk, see Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Commodity Price Risk” of this Form 10‑K.
Wood
Our sources of wood include purchases from local producers, including sawmills that supply residual wood chips, wood harvested from government-owned land on which we hold timber supply guarantees or harvesting rights, and property we own or lease. In Quebec, under the Sustainable Forest Development Act, volumes are allocated through timber supply guarantees, which are five years in length and renewable, subject to certain conditions. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we were allocated 4.34.5 million cubic meters of supply through the timber supply guarantees. In Ontario, we had long-term harvesting rights for approximately 11.5 million acres of government-owned land, as of December 31, 2017.2020. The harvesting rights licenses in Ontario are 20 years in length and automatically renew every five years, contingent upon our continualcontinued compliance with environmental performance and reforestation requirements.
We depend heavily on harvesting rights and timber supply guarantees over government-owned land in Ontario and Quebec, respectively. The volume of harvest permitted under these licenses is subject to limits, which are generally referred to as the annual allowable cut (“AAC”(or, the “AAC). The AAC is reviewed regularly, typically every five years in Quebec and every 10 years in Ontario. The chief forester of the province ofnext AAC revision in Quebec ordered significant reductionsis scheduled to the allowable harvest between 2006 and 2018, and announced a preliminary increase of 5.9% to thetake place in 2023 while Ontario is completing AAC revisions in 2021 for the spruce, pine, fir, and larch species thatforests in which we require, for the period of 2018 to 2023. Also, aboutoperate. About 25% of the total allowable harvestharvesting rights in Quebec isare allocated through an open auction system. The prices generated by the auction system are used to set pricing for the remainder of the AAC. The timber requirements for our U.S. sawmills are met mostly by purchasing timber from timberland owners.
In addition to the forest management regulations that we must abide with, we have sought out independent certification for 100% of the forests that we manage or on which we hold significant harvesting rights in order to demonstrate our strong belief that it is possible to carefully harvest treesoperate successfully with sustainable harvesting practices while maintaining biodiversity and protecting the forest;forest, values important to a range of stakeholders. The woodlands that we manage are all independently certified to at least one of two internationally recognized forest management standards:standard: Sustainable Forestry Initiative® (“ (or, “SFI®”) and Forest Stewardship Council® (“ (or, “FSC®”). In 2017,2020, we successfully maintained SFI forest management certificationcertifications for all of our managed woodlands in Quebec and Ontario. One FSC forest management certificate in the Abitibi region of Quebec was not renewed at the end of its five-year term and expired on January 2, 2018. We continuealso continued to maintain the other FSC forest management certificates that we held in Quebec and Ontario. In addition, we continue to be one of the largest holders of SFI and FSC forest management certificates in North America.
We have also instituted fiber-tracking systems at all of our North American facilities to ensure that our wood fiber supply comes from acceptable sources such as certified forests and legal harvesting operations, with the exception of our Hialeah tissue mill.three recently acquired sawmills in the U.S. South, which are expected to have their fiber-tracking systems certified in 2021. These systems are third-party certified according to one or more of three internationally recognized chain of custody standards, namely SFI, FSC, and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (“PEFC”(or, “PEFC). 100% of our wood and fiber sources isare procured through the FSC Controlled Wood standard, the FSC chain of custody certification, the PEFC due diligence requirements, or the SFI fiber sourcing requirements, and in some cases a combination of these standards, with the exception of our Hialeah tissue mill, which sources 100% of its recycled fiber supply from our U.S. pulp network.standards.
We strive to improve our forest management and wood fiber procurement practices and we encourage our wood and fiber suppliers to demonstrate continual improvement in forest resource management, wood and fiber procurement, and third-party certification.
7

Table of Contents
Chemicals
We use various chemicals in our pulp, tissue, and paper manufacturing operations including caustic soda, sodium chlorate, hydrogen peroxide, liquid sodium hydrosulfite, and sulfuric acid.
Recovered paper
We are a large consumer of recycled fiber in North America and have de-inking plants that use advanced mechanical and chemical processes to manufacture high quality pulp from recovered paper to produce RBK pulp. The Menominee and Fairmont pulp mills manufacture products containing 100% recycled fiber. In 2017, we used 440,000 metric tons of recovered paper in our production processes.

Energy
Steam and electrical power constitute the primary forms of energy used in pulp, tissue, and paper production. Process steam is produced in boilers using a variety of fuel sources, as well as heat recovery units in mechanical pulp facilities. All of our pulp, paper and tissue operating sites generate 100% of their own steam requirements. In 2017, our2020, the Alma, Calhoun, Catawba, Coosa Pines, Dolbeau, Gatineau, Kénogami, Saint-Félicien and Thunder Bay operations collectively consumed approximately 48%61% of their electrical requirements from internal sources, notably on-site cogeneration and hydroelectric dams. We purchased the balance of our electrical energy needs from third parties. We have sevensix sites that operate cogeneration facilities and all of these sites generate primarily “green energy”green energy from renewable biomass. In addition, we utilize alternative fuels such as used oil and tire-derived fuel to reduce consumption of fossil fuels.
We also have one hydroelectric generation and transmission network (Hydro-Saguenay in the Saguenay – Lac-Saint-Jean region of Quebec), which consists of seven generating stations with 170 MW of capacity. The water rights agreements required to operate some of these facilities typically range from 10 to 2550 years and, subject to certain conditions, some are generally renewable for additional terms. In some cases, the agreements are contingent on the continued operation of the related paper mills and a minimum level of capital spending in the region. For the other facilities, the right to generate hydroelectricity stems from our ownership of the riverbed on which these facilities are located.
Competition
In general, our products, other than tissue, are globally-traded commodities. The markets in which we compete are highly competitive and, aside from quality specifications to meet customer needs, including designations to globally recognized forest management and chain of custody standards, the production of our products other than tissue, does not depend upon a proprietary process or formula. Pricing and the level of shipments of our products are influenced by the balance between supply and demand as affected by global economic conditions, changes in consumption and capacity, the level of customer and producer inventories, and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Prices for our products have been and are likely to continue to be highly volatile.
We produce six major grades of market pulp (NBSK, SBSK, NBHK, SBHK, RBK, and fluff), for which we compete with a number of major market pulp producers, primarily with operations in North America. Market pulp being a globally-traded commodity, we also compete with other producers from South America (eucalyptus hardwood and radiata pine softwood), Europe (northern hardwood and softwood), and Asia (mixed tropical hardwood). Price, quality, service, and fiber sources are considered the main competitive determinants.
We are an integrated manufacturer of tissue products and compete with several major competitors in the North American tissue market. The key competitive attributes in this market include price, product quality, service, and customer relationships. Competition is also significantly affected by geographic location, as freight costs represent a material portion of the costs. We compete with branded and private-label products within North American products.America.
We compete in North America with both large North American and numerous smaller local lumber producers in a highly competitive market. We also compete with European producers in the North American market during periods of favorable currencies and prices. Because there are few distinctions between lumber from different producers, competition is primarily based on price. Competition is also affected by cost and availability of wood, freight cost, and labor. We have been required to pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties on the vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills, since April 28, 2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the rates for such estimated countervailing and anti-dumping duties were 19.10% and 1.15%, respectively. During any period in which our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products from our Canadian sawmills are subject to countervailing duty or anti-dumping cash deposit requirements or duty requirements, our competitive position could be materially affected. For additional information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors – Legal and Compliance Risks – We are subject to countervailing and anti-dumping duty orders on the vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills, which could materially affect our operations and cash flows,” of this Form 10‑K.
Newsprint is produced by numerous manufacturers worldwide. In 2017,2020, the five largest North American newsprint producers represented approximately 87%88% of North American newsprint capacity, and the five largest global producers represented approximately 32% of global newsprint capacity. We face competition from both large global producers and numerous smaller regional producers. Price, quality, and customer relationships are important competitive determinants.
Our specialty papers, including uncoated mechanical, coated mechanical and uncoated freesheet papers compete on the basis of price, quality, service, and breadthrange of product line. We compete with numerous uncoated mechanical paper producers, with the five largest North American producers
8

Table of Contents
representing 84%89% of the North American uncoated mechanical papers capacity, and the five largest global producers representing 47%54% of global uncoated mechanical papers capacity in 2017.2020. In addition, imports from overseas accounted for approximately 12%9% of North American uncoated mechanical paper demand in 2017. We also compete with a number of other coated mechanical paper producers with operations in North America. In 2017, the five largest North American producers represented approximately 93% of North American capacity for coated mechanical papers. Imports of coated mechanical papers accounted for approximately 15% of North American demand in 2017.2020. There are also numerous worldwide suppliers of other grades of paper such as coated freesheet.
Substantially all of our U.S. imports of SC paper, uncoated groundwood (“UGW”) paper,mechanical papers and softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian mills are subject to one or more orders requiring us to pay cash deposits to the U.S. for estimated countervailing or anti-dumping duties. Since October 20, 2015, we have been required to pay cash deposits at a subsidy rate of 17.87% for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports of SC paper produced at our Canadian mills. We also became

required to pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties on our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills, since April 28, 2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the rates for such estimated countervailing and anti-dumping duties were 14.7% and 3.2%, respectively. Additionally, since January 16, 2018, we have been required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. at a preliminary rate of 4.42% for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports of UGW paper produced at our Canadian mills. The countervailing duty and anti-dumping investigations of UGW paper produced in Canada are at a preliminary stage, and it is uncertain at the conclusion of those investigations, at what rate, if any, we will be required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. for estimated countervailing or anti-dumping duties on our imports to the U.S. of UGW paper produced at our Canadian mills. During any period in which our U.S. imports of SC paper, UGW paper, or softwood lumber products from our Canadian mills are subject to countervailing duty or anti-dumping cash deposit requirements or duty requirements, our competitive position of those products could be materially affected. For additional information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors – Legal and Compliance Risk – We are subject to countervailing or anti-dumping duties on our U.S. imports of paper products and substantially all of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian mills, which could materially affect our operations and cash flows,” of this Form 10‑K.coated freesheet.
As with other global commodities, the competitive position of our products is significantly affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. For additional information, see Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Foreign Currency Exchange Risk,” of this Form 10-K.
Trends in non-print media are expected to continue to adversely affect demand for traditional print media, including our newsprint and specialty papers, and those of our customers.media. For additional information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors – Strategic RiskRisksDevelopments in non-print media and changes in consumer habits regarding the use of paper are expected to continue to adversely affect the demand for some of our key products, and our responses to these developments may not be successful,” of this Form 10-K.
Based on market interest, we offer a number of our products, particularly market pulp and wood products with specific designations to one or more globally recognized forest management and chain of custody standards. Our ability to conform to new or existing guidelines for certification depends on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as: changes to the standards or the interpretation or the application of the standards; the adequacy of government-implemented conservation measures; and the existence of territorial disputes between First NationsIndigenous peoples and governments. If we are unable to offer certified products, or to meet commitments to supply certified product, it could adversely affect the marketability of our products and our ability to compete with other producers.
EmployeesHuman Capital
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we employed approximately 7,7007,100 people, of whom approximately 5,1003,700 were represented by various unions, primarily Unifor, and the Confederation of National Trade Unions (the “CNTU”(or, the “CNTU) in Canada, and predominantly by the United Steelworkers International (the “USW”(or, the “USW) in the U.S. In the past year, we renewed or entered into a number of agreements with unions, covering approximately 260500 employees in Canada. Collective agreements covering approximately 1,300300 employees in Canada are scheduled to expire in 2018, affectinghave expired, involving certain pulp and paper mills, sawmills and woodlands operations.Canadian sawmills.
While we intend to renew collective agreements, there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew agreements on satisfactory terms, or that we will maintain continuously satisfactory agreements with all of our unionized employees. Should we be unable to do so, it could result in strikes, work stoppages, or disturbances by affected employees, which could cause us to experience a disruption of operations and affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our long-term competitiveness is tied to the ability to recruit, develop and retain top-quality employees with the right skills. We are building a strong corporate culture that attracts results-driven and action-oriented employees and allows natural leaders to grow. We hired 970 new permanent and temporary employees, raising our employer profile through targeted recruitment practices. We assessed 100% of salaried employees’ effectiveness through the Demonstrated Effectiveness Appraisal process, which is focused on enhancing organizational capability through managerial accountability and people development. We continue to train every employee on Resolute’s Code of Business Conduct and have in place a Diversity Policy designed to ensure equal consideration and opportunities to all employees. We are equally committed to ensuring that our employees are consistently motivated and engaged by promoting individual professional development goals, support sharing of knowledge and resources across the Company, and create opportunities for growth and learning wherever possible.
The health and safety of our employees is a core Company value. We are committed to providing our employees with safe working environments, in addition to complying with applicable legal requirements at all our sites. Since 2015, our Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) incident rate world-class performance has been below 0.80, and we achieved an OSHA incident rate of 0.62 in 2020, which is one of the lowest rates within the North American forestry products industry.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a vigilance committee has been set up to collect and analyze continuous relevant information through the appropriate public health authorities where we operate, and more than 30 pandemic crisis management protocols have been implemented to ensure the safety and health of employees and contractors working at all our sites, helping to mitigate disruptions of operations.
In addition, the board adopted a board-level diversity policy striving to maintain a minimum of 25% representation each of men and women on our board of directors, as well as an executive leadership-level diversity policy acknowledging diversity as a key factor in the Company’s talent management strategy. Currently there are two women on the board representing 29% of its membership.
9

Table of Contents
Trademarks
We have registrations or pending applications for our key trademarks “RESOLUTE” and “resolute Forest Products & Design” in the countries of our principal markets, as well as “RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS”, “R Design”, and “RESOLUTE TISSUE” in Canada and the United States,U.S., and “RÉSOLU” and “Produits forestiers résolu & Design” in Canada. The current registrations of these trademarks are effective for various periods of time and may be renewed periodically, provided that we, as the registered owner, comply with all applicable renewal requirements.
Environmental and Other Regulated Matters
We are subject to a varietynumber of federal or national, state, provincial, and local environmental laws and regulations in various jurisdictions relating to the jurisdictions in which we operate.environment, health and safety, and some of our infrastructure, including dams and bridges. We believe our operations are in material compliance with current applicable environmental, health and safety, as well as applicable infrastructure laws and regulations. While it is impossible to predict future environmentallaws and regulations that may be established,adopted, we believe that we will not be at a significant competitive disadvantage with regard to meeting future Canadian or United StatesU.S. standards. For additional information, see Note 16,18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Environmental matters,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Internet Availability of Information
We make our Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports, available free of charge on our website (www.resolutefp.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish such materials to the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains our reports and other information filed with the SEC. In addition, any materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. Information on the operations of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our reports are also available on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval website (www.sedar.com).

10

Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-K and in other documents we file with the SEC, you should carefully consider the following factors, among others, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results.results, reputation as well as the market price of our securities. In particular, the risks described below could cause actual events to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K.
Risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic
The outbreak of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 has had, and could continue to have a negative impact on financial markets, economic conditions and portions of our business. While we are unable to predict the extent, nature and duration of these impacts at this time, the global COVID-19 pandemic could negatively affect our business and results of operations, as well as the market price of our securities, in a number of ways, including the following:
While we expect to continue to operate in all of our business segments in Canada and the U.S., we have reduced our operational footprint to levels consistent with essential or reduced needs, including the temporary idling of certain machines or facilities and implementing temporary or permanent layoffs. Further adjustments to our operational footprint, temporary or permanent, could be made as the COVID-19 pandemic situation develops.
The COVID-19 pandemic has already accelerated the secular demand decline for paper products like those we manufacture as widespread confinement alters consumer habits, which has had, and could continue to have an impact on pulp demand. The decline in demand and altered habits could have a permanent effect.
Any construction slowdown in North America may result in a decline in demand for wood products. If the demand for wood products falls and we reduce harvesting and sawmill activity as a result, we could have greater difficulty obtaining the supply of timber and wood fiber required for our operations at favorable prices, or at all.
There is lower demand for our away-from-home tissue products usually found in hotels, restaurants, schools, office buildings and other businesses or premises, and our ability to convert our tissue for the retail market may be limited.
There is increased risk that we may not obtain raw materials, chemicals and other required supplies or services in a timely fashion and at favorable prices due to the impact of the reduced economic activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on our suppliers, which could affect our production output and profitability.
Additional trade restrictions or barriers could also negatively affect our supply chain as well as the sales or distribution of our products.
The impact of the reduced economic activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers has increased our risk of credit exposure and that risk could continue to increase.
Although the forest products industry has generally been recognized as critical or essential in locations where we operate, the current health restrictions, including social distancing measures, impact how our employees fulfill their duties, and limits the number of employees we can have at our operations, which in turn could impact our production output and costs.
It could be difficult or costly to restart certain of our temporarily idled operations, and we could face personnel shortages if employees are no longer available or amenable to return to work.
Should certain employees become ill from COVID-19 or unable to work, the attention of our management team could be diverted and our operations could be affected.
The reduced operations and staffing at our facilities, remote working conditions and increased risk of obtaining supplies or services could increase the risk of non-compliance and incidents.
If necessary, to preserve liquidity, we could suspend or defer capital projects, as well as other strategic initiatives. Strategies to increase earnings power or generate additional cash flow, including acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions could be delayed or not materialize given the current economic uncertainty. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we could decide to permanently shut down machines or facilities and be required to record significant closure costs, remediation costs, long-lived asset impairment or accelerated depreciation charges.
The economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing decline in financial market returns and low-interest rate environment could continue to result in an increase in the amount by which our pension plans are underfunded by the next measurement date at year-end. This could result in a significant increase in the amount of our required future pension contributions, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
11

Table of Contents
If we do not generate enough cash to fund our short-term or long-term obligations, we may have to draw further on our credit facilities to meet our obligations or seek additional sources of liquidity. The economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and any downgrade of our credit ratings could lead to greater difficulty in obtaining additional financing on favorable terms.
The COVID-19 pandemic, including related governmental responses and economic impacts, market disruptions and changes in consumer habits, has heightened the risks and uncertainties described in the risk factors below, and should be read in conjunction therewith.
Strategic RiskRisks
Strategic risks relate to our future business plans and strategies, including the risks associated with the global macro-environment in which we operate, trends in our industry, demand for our products, competitive threats, product innovation, public policy developments, changes to consumption habits, resource allocation, and strategic initiatives, including mergers and acquisitions, dispositions, and restructuring activity.
Developments in non-print media and changes in consumer habits regarding the use of paper are expected to continue to adversely affect the demand for some of our key products, and our responses to these developments may not be successful.products.
Trends in non-print media are expected to continue to adversely affect demand for traditional print media, including our newsprint and specialty papers, and those of our customers.customers’ products. Neither the timing nor the extent of these trends can be predicted with certainty. Our newspaper, magazine, book and catalog publishing customers could increase their use of, and compete with, non-print media, including videomultimedia technologies, electronic storage and audio-based advertising and data transmission, non-print storage technologies, and non-print communication platforms such as websites and social media, which could further reduce their consumption of newsprint, commercial printing papers or other products we manufacture.manufacture, including market pulp. The demand for some of our paper products has weakened significantly over the past decade. This situation has accelerated since the COVID-19 pandemic as confinement and work from home has altered consumer habits, which could become permanent and also impact the demand for pulp. For example, over the 10 years ended December 31, 2017,2020, according to industry statistics, North American newsprint demand fell by 65%. This trend, which similarly affects our specialty papers, could continue as a result of developments69%, and fell by 26% in non-print media, lower North American newspaper circulation, weaker paper-based advertising, grade substitution and conservation measures taken by publishers and retailers.2020.
We face intense competition in the forest products industry and the failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.industry.
We compete with numerous forest products companies, some of which have greater financial resources than we do.resources. The trend toward consolidation in the forest products industry has led to the formation of sizable global producers that have greater flexibility in pricing and financial resources for marketing, investment, research and expansion than we do.development, innovation, and expansion. Because the markets for our products are all highly competitive, actions by competitors can affect our ability to compete and the volatility of prices at which our products are sold.
The forest products industry is capital intensive, and requireswe require significant investment to remain competitive. Some of our competitors may be lower-cost producers in some of the businesses in which we operate. In particular,For example, the sizable low-cost hardwood and softwood grade pulp capacity in South America, which continues to grow as a result of ongoing investment and whose costs are thought to be very competitive, and the actions those mills take to gain market share, could continue to adversely affect our competitive position in similar grades. This in turn could affectimpact our sales and cash flows, and push us to consider significant capital investments to remain competitive. Failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If we are unable to offer products certified to globally recognized forestry management and chain of custody standards or meet customers’ product specifications, it could adversely affect our ability to compete.
Based on market interest, we offer a number of our products, including some paper grades, some grades of market pulp and paper, wood products,and tissue, with specific designations to one or more globally recognized forest management and chain of custody standards.standards as well as product specifications to meet customers’ requirements. Our ability to conform to new or existing guidelines for certification depends on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as: changes to the standards or the interpretation or the application of the standards; the collaboration of our suppliers in timely sharing product information; the adequacy of government-implemented conservation measures; and the existence of territorial disputes between First NationsIndigenous peoples and

governments. If we are unable to offer certified products, or to meet commitments to supply certified product or meet the product specifications of our customers, it could adversely affect the marketability of our products and our ability to compete with other producers.
12

Table of Contents
We may not be successful in implementing our strategies to increase earnings power.
Our corporate strategy includes,is focused on continuing to transform the one hand,Company away from mature product markets and products in structurally declining demand toward a gradual retreat from certain paper grades,more profitable and onsustainable organization over the other, using our strong financial position to act on opportunities to diversify and grow.long run. This strategy has three core themes:includes maximizing value generation from structurally declining paper, growing in pulp tissue, and wood products, and integrating our pulp into value-added quality tissue.tissue, and investing in product innovation, while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation.
The implementation of our corporate strategy is subject to uncertainty and could require significant capital investments, and involves significant capital allocation and financing decisions as well as a substantial number of mills, machines, and personnel.investments. In addition, strategic initiatives could have unintended consequences, including, for example, a loss of certain pulp customers if our tissue segment becomes competitive with tissue products sold by those customers.
As part of our corporate strategy, we pursue acquisitions, divestitures, and other strategic transactions and projects to complement, expand or optimize our business, such as our entry into wood manufacturing in the U.S., and tissue production and sales through our 2015 acquisition of Atlas Tissue, and our new tissue operations at Calhoun.sales. In connection with any acquisition, divestiture, strategic transaction or project, we may not successfully integrate an acquired business, or assets, technologies, processes, controls, policies, and operations with ours or realize some or all of the anticipated benefits and synergies of the acquisition, divestiture, strategic transaction or project. In connection with such transactions, we may face challenges associated with entering into a new market, orproduction location, product category, such as our entry into tissue productionor meeting customers’ demands. We may also face issues with the separation of processes and sales, including competition for market share.loss of synergies following the divestiture of businesses. In addition, we may not be able to successfully negotiate potential acquisitions, divestitures, strategic transactions or projects that we identify, or may not be able to obtain financing that may be needed. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities and the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, and substantial goodwill. The negotiation of any transaction and its completion may be complex, costly, and time consuming. To the extent we are unsuccessful in implementing our corporate strategy or our efforts do not achieve the anticipated outcomes, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Changes in the political or economic conditions in the United States,U.S., Canada or other countries in which we sell our products could adversely affect our results of operations.
We manufacture products in the United StatesU.S. and Canada, and we sell products throughout the world. The economic and political policies of each country and region have a significant impact on our costs and the prices of, and demand for, our products. Changes in regional economies and economic policies can affect demand for and the cost of,our products, manufacturing and distributing our products, as well asdistribution costs, pricing, sales volume, and the availability or cost of insurance. These changes, in turn, can affect our results of operations. Changes to regional economies and economic policies that can bring about such effects include, among others, changes in the terms of, or countries that are parties to, bilateral and multi-lateral trade agreements and arrangements, limitations on the ability of potential customers to import products or obtain foreign currency for payment of imported products, and political and economic instability, including pandemics, significant civil unrest, acts of war or terrorist activities, or unstable or unpredictable governments in countries in which we operate or trade.
Our business is subject to global economic conditions and is highly cyclical; soft conditions could cause a number of the risks we face to increase in likelihood, magnitude and duration.
Our operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions. During periods of weak or weakening global economic conditions, we would expect any increase in unemployment or lower gross domestic product growth rates to adversely affect demand for our products as our customers delay or reduce their expenditures. For example, during an economic downturn, end consumers may reduce newspaper and magazine subscriptions as a direct result of their financial circumstances, contributing to lower demand for our products by our customers. Advertising demand in printed magazines and newspapers including classified advertisements, may also decline. Lower demand for print advertisements leads to fewer or smaller pages in, and may lead to less frequent publication of, printed newspapers, magazines and other advertisement circulars and periodicals, decreasing the demand for our products. In addition, demand for our market pulp products is generally associated with the production rates of paper producers, as well as consumption trends for products such as tissue, toweling and absorbent products.
An economic downturn in the U.S. or Canada maycould also negatively affect the U.S. or Canadian housing industry, which is a significant driver of demand for our lumber and other wood-based products. For example, a decline in housing starts mayor in the repair and remodeling segment could create a low level of primary demand for our lumber and other wood-based products, which we would expect to result in our wood products business operating at a lower level until there is a meaningful recovery in new residential construction demand.demand or in the repair and remodeling sector. In addition, with less lumber demand, sawmills could generate fewer wood chips that we use in our pulp and paper mills, which leadscould lead those mills to increase their supply from the open market, where prices can fluctuate with market conditions. We wouldcould also have less wood residue to use internally, which would increase our fossil fuel consumption and, as a result, our costs and environmental impact.

13

Table of Contents
The forest products industry is also highly cyclical. The overall levels of demand for the products we manufacture, and consequently, our sales and profitability, reflect fluctuations in levels of end user demand. As described above, end user demand depends at least in part on general economic conditions in North America and the world, and the effect can be significant. In addition to end user demand, we have experienced cyclical changes in prices, sales volume and margins for our commodity products as a result of changing market trends and the effect of capacity fluctuations on supply and demand as well as the relative competitiveness of producers. Because our commodity products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition is based mainly on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand, which is in turn affected by the factors described above.
Operational RiskRisks
Operational risks arise from external events, processes, people and systems that affect the operation of our businesses. These include risks affecting, among other things, marketing and sales, woodlands management, production, supply chains, information management, data protection and security, including cybersecurity, human resources, and reputation.
Our manufacturing businesses may have difficulty obtaining timber or wood fiber at favorable prices, or at all.
Wood fiber is the principal raw material we use in our business. We primarily use both virgin fiber – wood chips and logs – and recycled fiber – primarilysorted office paper – as fiber sources for our pulp, tissue, and paper mills. Our primary source for wood fiber is timber. Our wood products business is also dependent on our timber supply.
For our timber supply, weWe depend heavily on harvesting rights and timber supply guarantees over government-owned land in Ontario and Quebec, respectively. The volume of harvest permitted under these licenses is subject to limits, which are generally referred to as the AAC.annual allowable cut (or, “AAC”). The AAC is reviewed regularly, typically every five years in Quebec and every 10 years in Ontario. The chief forester of the province ofnext AAC revision in Quebec ordered significant reductionsis scheduled to the allowable harvest between 2006 and 2018, and announced a preliminary increase of 5.9% to thetake place in 2023 while Ontario is completing AAC revisions in 2021 for the spruce, pine, fir, and larch species thatforests in which we require, for the period of 2018 to 2023. Also, aboutoperate. About 25% of the total allowable harvestharvesting rights in Quebec isare allocated through an open auction system. The prices generated by the auction system are used to set pricing for the remainder of the AAC.
In addition, regulatory developments, activist campaigns and litigation advanced by First NationsIndigenous groups or other interested partiesstakeholders have caused, and may cause in the future, significant reductions in the amount of timber available for commercial harvest in Canada, or that meet standards required for third-party certifications. Future regulation, particularly by Ontario, Quebec, or the federal Canadian government, as well as litigation, changes in forest management certification standards, and actions taken by activists to influence the availability of timber for commercial harvest could focus on any one or more of:
of the use of timberlands;
timberlands, forest management practices;
practices, forest management and chain of custody certification standards;
standards, consultation with First Nations group;
theIndigenous groups, protection of habitats and endangered or other species, including the woodland caribou;
thecaribou, promotion of forest biodiversity;biodiversity, and
the response to, and prevention of, catastrophic wildfires.
Increased pressures on the Canadian provincial and federal governments to increase the protection of the woodland caribou, its habitat, and the boreal forest, could impact timber supply. For example, regulations relating to habitats, and endangered or other species which are proposed for adoption by Ontario, could significantly reduce timber supply in that province, including to our Ontario mills. Our access to timber may also be affected by factors such as fire and fire prevention, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, drought, flooding, and other natural and man-made causes, which could potentially reduce supply and increase prices.
Though timber is our primary source of fiber, wood fiber is a commodity and we also buy a significant portion of our fiber requirements on the open market. Prices for wood fiber are cyclical and subject to market influences, which could be concentrated in one or more regions due to market shifts. The timber requirements for our U.S. sawmills are met mostly by purchasing timber from timberland owners.
If we are unable to obtain adequate supplies of timber or wood fiber at favorable prices for any of the reasons described above, our business operation could be materially and adversely affected.

A sustained increase in the cost of purchased energy and other raw materials would lead to higher manufacturing costs, which could reduce our margins.
Our operations consume large amounts of energy, such as electricity, natural gas, fuel oil, and wood residue, a substantial proportion of which we buy on the open market. The main raw materials we require in our manufacturing processes are wood fiber chemicals, and recovered paper.chemicals. The prices for raw materials and energy are volatile and may change rapidly, which impacts our manufacturing costs, directly affects our results of operations and has contributedmay contribute to earnings volatility.
For our commodity products, the relationship between industry supply and demand, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, determines our ability to increase prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass along increases in our operating costs to our customers. Any sustained increase in energy, chemical, or raw material prices without any corresponding increase
14

Table of Contents
in product pricing would reduce our operating margins and potentially require us to limit or cease operations of one or more of our machines.facilities.
We also generate electricity for our operations at our hydroelectric facilities. There can be no certainty that we will be able to maintain ourthe water rights which are necessary for our hydroelectric power generating facilities, or to renew them on favorable conditions. The closure of certain machines or facilities located in Quebec could trigger the exercise of termination rights by the Quebec government under hydro water rights agreements. The amount of electricity we can generate from our hydroelectric power facilities is also subject to the volume of rain or snowfall and is therefore variable from one year to the next.
We are subject to physical, financial and financialregulatory risks associated with global, regional, and local weather conditions, and climate change.
Our operations and the operations of our suppliers are subject to climate variations, which impact the productivity of forests, the frequency and severity of wildfires, the availability of water, the distribution and abundance of species, and the spread of disease or insect epidemics, which in turn may adversely or positively affect timber production.production and availability. Over the past several years, changing weather patterns and climatic conditions due to natural and man-made causes have added to the unpredictability and frequency of natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, hailstorms, wildfires, drought, flooding, snow, ice storms, the spread of disease, and insect infestations. Any of these natural disasters could also affect our woodlands or cause variations in the cost of raw materials, such as virgin fiber. Changes in precipitation resulting in droughts could make wildfires more frequent or more severe, and could adversely affect timber harvesting or our hydroelectric production.
To the extent The effects of global, regional, orand local weather conditions, and climate conditions or change, impacts raw material availability or our hydroelectric production, it mayincluding the costs of complying with evolving climate change regulations and transition costs relating to a low carbon economy could also adversely impact our costs and revenues.results of operations.
We could experience disruptions in operations or increased labor costs due to labor disputes.disputes or occupational health and safety issues.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we employed approximately 7,7007,100 people, of whom approximately 5,1003,700 were represented by various unions, primarily Unifor, and the Confederation of National Trade Unions (or, the “CNTU”) in Canada, and predominantly by the United Steelworkers International (or, the “USW”) in the U.S. In 2017,the past year, we renewed or entered into a number of agreements with unions, covering approximately 260500 employees in Canada. Collective agreements covering approximately 1,300300 employees in Canada are scheduled to expire in 2018, affectinghave expired, involving certain pulp and paper mills, sawmills and woodlands operations.Canadian sawmills.
While we intend to renew collective agreements, there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew agreements on satisfactory terms, or that we will maintain continuously satisfactory agreements with all of our unionized employees. Should we be unable to do so, it could result in strikes, work stoppages, or disturbances by affected employees, which could cause us to experience a disruption of operations and affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Occupational health and safety issues, including relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, could also cause disruptions in operations or otherwise affect labor-related costs.
Difficulties in our employee relations or difficulties identifying, attracting, and retaining employees for work, particularly in our remote locations and certain positions with specialized skills, could lead to operational delaysdisruptions or increase our costs.
Our ability to achieve our future goals and objectives is dependent, in part, on maintaining good relations with our employees and minimizing employee turnover at our corporate offices, mills, and woodlands operations. Work stoppages, excessive employee turnover, or difficulty in attracting and retaining employees, particularly for work in remote locations and certain positions with specialized skill sets, could lead to operational delaysdisruptions or increased costs.
Disruptions to our supply chain, operations, or the delivery of our products, could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
The success of our businesses is largely contingent on the availability of, and direct access to, raw materials, andas well as our ability to ship products on a timely and cost-efficient basis. As a result, any event that disrupts or limits transportation or delivery services or the operations of our suppliers could materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, our operating results depend on the continued operation of our various production facilities and our ability to complete construction and maintenance projects on schedule. Interruptions of operations at our facilities, including interruptions caused by the events described below, could materially reduce the productivity and

profitability of a particular manufacturing facility, or our business as a whole, during and after the period of such operational difficulties.
15

Table of Contents
Our operations, supply chain, and transportation and delivery services are subject to potential hazards, including explosions, fires, accidental release of toxic materials, severe weather and natural disasters, mechanical and power failures, structural failures at any of our dams or hydroelectric facilities, unscheduled downtimes, prolonged power failures, supplier disruptions, labor shortages including woodland contractors, or other labor difficulties, public health measures to prevent or eradicate epidemics or pandemics, transportation interruptions, including as a result of shortages of carriers or drivers, remediation complications, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, other environmental and workplace risks, and terrorist or other violent acts.
Some of these hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, equipment, or the environment, and can result in, among other things: the suspension of operations; the shutdown of affected facilities; reputational damage; the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; workers’ compensation; and claims against us with respect to workplace exposure, exposure of contractors on our premises, as well as other persons located nearby.
We are subject to cybersecurity risks relateddisruptions to breaches of security pertainingthe information technology systems used to sensitive company, customer, employee, and vendor information, as well as breaches in the technology that managesmanage our operations and other business processes.processes, including cybersecurity and privacy incidents that could involve sensitive company, employee, customer, vendor, and shareholder information.
We use information technologiestechnology to securely manage operations and various business functions. We rely on various technologies to process, store, and report on our business and interact with employees, customers, vendors, and employees.shareholders. The secure and reliable processing, maintenance, and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security design and controls, and those of our third-party providers, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to interruptions, breakdowns, cyberattacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error, malfeasance, hackers, computer viruses, ransomware, natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, as well as other disruptions. Any suchA cybersecurity breach could result in operational disruptions or the misappropriation of sensitive data or personal information and could subject us to civil and criminal penalties, litigation, or have a negative impact on our reputation. We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or cyberattacks, or to remediate problems caused by such breaches, attacks, or attacks.other disruptions. We have been the subject of cyberattacks from time to time, none of which have had a material impact on our business information systems or operations. There can be no assurance that such disruptions or misappropriations and the resulting repercussions will not negatively impact our cash flows and materially affect our results of operations or financial condition. The U.S.Recent developments in cybersecurity and Canadian legislatures alsoprivacy legislation in different jurisdictions are considering cybersecurity legislation that, if enacted, could imposeimposing additional obligations on us and could expand our potential liability in the event of a cybersecurity or privacy incident.
We are currently transitioning from certain legacy system applications, and during the transition, such legacy systems may be more vulnerable to attack or failure and implementation of the transition may cause disruptions to our business information systems.
We are currently in the ongoing process of replacing certain legacy system applications with an integrated business management software platform. Prior to the completion of this upgrading process, we may not have supplier or third-party support for legacy systems in the event of failure or required updates, and such legacy systems may be more vulnerable to breakdown, malicious intrusion, and random attack. Prior to the completion of this upgrading process, we may also experience difficulties maintaining or replacing the hardware infrastructure required to operate these legacy systems. Such legacy systems, if not properly functioning prior to their replacement, could adversely affect our business.
During the process of replacing legacy systems, we could experience disruptions to our business information systems and normal operating processes because of the projects’ complexity. The potential adverse consequences could include delays, loss of information, decreased management reporting capabilities, damage to our ability to process transactions, harm to our control environment, diminished employee productivity, business interruptions, and unanticipated increases in costs. Further, our ability to achieve anticipated operational benefits from new platforms is not assured.
Negative publicity, even if unjustified, could have a negative impact on our brand and the marketability of our products.
We believe that we have established a reputation for transparent communications, social and corporate governance, responsible forestry practices, and overall sustainability leadership. We also believe that our commitment to sustainable and responsible forestry practices extends well beyond strict compliance with applicable forestry regulations, which in Quebec and Ontario are already among the most, if not the most, rigorous in the world. Negative publicity, whether or not justified, relating to our operations and our business could tarnish our reputation or reduce the value of our brand and market demand for our products. In addition, the actions of activists, whether or not justified, could impede or delay our ability to access raw materials or obtain third-party certifications with respect to forest management and chain of custody standards that we seek in order to supply certified products to our customers. In these cases, we may have to incur significant expenses and dedicate additional resources to defend ourselves against activist campaigns, rebuild our reputation, and restore the value of our brand.

16

Table of Contents
Financial RiskRisks
Financial risks relate to our ability to meet financial obligations and mitigate exposure to broad market risks, including: volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices;prices, capital structure; andstructure, as well as credit and liquidity risk, including risk related to cash management, extension of credit, collections, credit ratings, and availability and cost of funding.
Currency fluctuations can adversely affect our competitive position, selling prices, manufacturing costs, and manufacturing costs.net monetary items.
We compete with producers from around the world, particularly North America, Europe, and South America, in most of our product lines, with the exception of wood products and tissue, where we compete primarily with other North American producers. We sell our products mainly in transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, but we also sell in certain local currencies, including the Canadian dollar, the euro, and the pound sterling. Changes in the relative strength or weakness of these currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, could affect international trade flows inof these products. A stronger U.S. dollar might attract imports, thereby increasing product supply and possibly creating downward pressure on prices. On the other hand, a weaker U.S. dollar might encourage U.S. exports but also increase manufacturing costs in Canadian dollars or other foreign currencies.dollars.
Variations in exchange rates could also significantly affect our competitive position. In 2017, for example, the strength of the U.S. dollar against certain European currencies and the currencies of other paper producing countries, in addition to the weak currencies in a number of paper importing countries, continued to negatively affect the competitive position of North American newsprint producers selling in certain U.S. dollar-denominated international newsprint markets, such as Asia and Latin America. Some of our European competitors were able to price products more aggressively in those markets as a result of the relative weakness of their local currency, which negatively affected our ability to compete.
We are particularly sensitive to changes in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar. The actual impact of these changes depends primarily on the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion of our financial assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, and the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the exchange rate. We expect exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact costs and revenues, but we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of this effect for any period, and there can be no assurance of any future effects. In 20162019 and 2017,2020, the Canadian dollar fluctuated between a low of US$0.691.27 in JanuaryDecember of 20162020 and a high of US$0.831.45 in SeptemberMarch of 2017.2020. Based on operating projections for 2018,2021, if the Canadian dollar strengthens by one cent against the U.S. dollar, we expect that it will decrease our annual operating income by approximately $17$16 million, and vice versa.
Furthermore, certain monetary assets and liabilities, including a substantial portion of our net pension and other postretirement benefit obligations and our net deferred income tax assets, and certain of our indebtedness, including the Quebec secured term loan facility (or, the “Loan Facility”) are denominated in Canadian dollars. As a result, our earnings and the amounts borrowable under our Loan Facility can be subject to the potentially significant effect of foreign exchange gains or losses in respect of these Canadian dollar net monetary items. A fluctuation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar in any given period would generally cause a foreign exchange gain or loss.loss or change in the effective availability of the Loan Facility.
The amount by which our pension plans are underfunded could increase the level of required contributions, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had net pension obligations of approximately $1,097$1,440 million, of which approximately 70%78% relates to our Canadian registered pension plans in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, and approximately 30%22% of which relates to our U.S. qualified pension plan. See Note 14,16, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, for a description of our pension plan funding obligations, including our unfunded pension obligations.
The amount by which our pension plans are funded or underfunded varies depending upon the return on pension fund investments, the level of interest rates used to determine minimum funding levels, the payments of benefits, and other actuarial assumptions and experience. Variations from our assumptions would cause the actual amount of our required contributions to vary from our current estimates. Any additional contributions to our pension fundsplans to fund potential resulting increased deficitsdeficit increases would be required to be paid over seven-year or 15-year periods,a period of time ranging from seven to 11 years depending upon the laws applicable to the funding of the specific pension plan, except that plans that are currently subject to 15-year periods will be gradually reduced to maximum 10-year periods by December 31, 2021.plan. Any change to laws and regulations applicable to the funding of our pension plans could also increase or decrease our future funding obligations. Similarly, because we make our Quebec and Ontario pension plan contributions in Canadian dollars, the amount of our contributions as stated in U.S. dollars can be subject to the potentially significant effect of foreign currency exchange rate variations. Any such variations could materially affect our cash flows and financial condition, in each case either positively or negatively depending on the direction and magnitude of the variation. In addition, an increase in our net pension obligations could make it more difficult to obtain financing on favorable terms.
It is also possible that regulators, including Canadian provincial pension regulators, could attempt to compel additional funding of certain of our pension plans, including our Canadian registered pension plans, in respect of plan members associated with sites we formerly operated in their respective

provinces.operated. On June 12, 2012, we filed a motion for directives with the Quebec Superior Court, the court with jurisdiction in the creditor protection proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (the “CCAA(or, the “CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings”Proceedings), seeking an order to prevent pension regulators in each of Quebec, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador from declaring partial wind-ups of pension plans relating to employees of former operations in
17

Table of Contents
New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador, or a declaration that any claim for accelerated reimbursements of deficits arising from a partial wind-up is a barred claim under the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings. A partial wind-up would likely shorten the period in which any deficit within those plans, which could reach up to Cdn $150C$150 million ($120 million, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017)118 million), would have to be funded if we do not obtain the relief sought. At this time, we cannot estimate the additional contributions, if any, that may be required in future years, but they could be material.
Our operations require substantial capital and we may be unable to maintain adequate capital resources to provide for all of our capital requirements.
Our businesses are capital intensive and require regular capital expenditures in order to maintain our equipment, increase our operating efficiency, and comply with environmental laws.laws, and innovate to remain competitive. If our available cash resources and cash generated from operations are not sufficient to fund our operating needs, make pension contributions, and finance our working capital, capital expenditures, and duty cash deposits, we would either need to borrow or reduce or delay capital expenditures. If we cannot maintain or upgrade our equipment as we require,required, we may become unable to manufacture products that compete effectively. An inability to make required capital expenditures in a timely fashion could also have a material adverse effect on our growth, business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The terms of our ABL Credit Facility, our Senior Secured Credit Facility, and the indenture governing our 20232026 Notes and our Loan Facility could restrict our current and future operations.operations, and changes relating to LIBOR could impact our borrowings under some of these facilities.
The credit agreements governing our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL(or, the “ABL Credit Facility”Facility), our senior secured credit facility (the “Senior(or, the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”Facility), and the indenture governing our 5.875%4.875% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”2026 (or, the “2026 Notes), and our Loan Facility contain a number ofcertain restrictive covenants that impose operating, borrowing, and financial restrictions on us and could limit our ability to engage in activities that might be in our long-term best interests. For a description of our ABL Credit Facility, Senior Secured Credit Facility, and the indenture governing the 20232026 Notes and the Loan Facility, including the covenants and restrictions they contain, see Note 13,15, “Long-Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
A breach of the covenants under the ABL Credit Facility, the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the 2026 Notes or under the indenture governing the 2023 NotesLoan Facility could result in an event of default, which could allow holders and lenders, as the case may be, to accelerate the repayment of their debt and could result in the acceleration of the repayment of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. An event of default under the ABL Credit Facility, or the Senior Secured Credit Facility or the Loan Facility would also allow the lenders to terminate all commitments to extend further credit to us under those facilities. If we were unable to repay amounts due and payable under the ABL Credit Facility, or the Senior Secured Credit Facility or the Loan Facility, the lenders would have the right to proceed against the collateral securing the indebtedness. In any of these events, we may seek to refinance our indebtedness, but be unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, we could be: limited in how we conduct our business; unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.opportunities; or forced to sell assets.
In addition, our borrowings under the ABL Credit Facility and the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates, primarily based on LIBOR as the reference. LIBOR is subject to national and international proposals for reform that may cause LIBOR to cease to exist after 2021 or to perform differently than in the past. While we expect that reasonable alternatives to LIBOR will be available, we cannot predict the consequences and timing of the development of alternative reference rates, and the transition to an alternative reference rate could result in an increase in our interest expense.
We may be subject to losses that might not be covered in whole or in part by our insurance coverage.
We maintain property, business interruption, credit, product, general liability, casualty, and other types of insurance, including pollution and legalenvironmental liability, that we believe are in accordance with customary industry practices, but we are not fully insured against all potential hazards inherent in our business, including losses resulting from human error, cybersecurity issues, natural disasters, war risks, or terrorist acts. As is typical in the industry, we also do not maintain insurance for any loss to our access to standing timber from natural disasters, regulatory changes, or other causes. Changes in insurance market conditions have caused, and may in the future cause, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies to increase substantially and in some instances, for certain insurance to become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, we might not be able to finance the amount of the uninsured liability on terms acceptable to us or at all, and might be obligated to divert a significant portion, or all, of our cash flow from normal business operations.
18

Table of Contents
We could be required to recordcurtail production, shut down machines or facilities, restructure operations, or sell non-core assets, which could result in recording significant additional closure costs and long-lived asset impairment or accelerated depreciation charges.
We have respondedAs part of our transformation strategy, and in response to the changing market dynamics by optimizing assets and streamlining our production. Ifstructurally declining demand for anysome of our products, continues to decline, or if the pace of decline accelerates, it may be necessary to further curtail production, even further, or permanently shut down more machines and facilities.facilities, restructure operations, or sell non-core assets. In addition to the potential loss of production, curtailments and shutdowns could result in asset or goodwill impairments, accelerated depreciation, and cash closure costs for the affected facilities,

including restructuring charges, and exit or disposal costs, and remediation and other environmental costs, which could negatively impact our cash flows and materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. The closure of machines or facilities could also trigger the payment of severance, additional pension contributions, or wind-up deficiencies.
Losses related to the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used are recognized when circumstances, such as continuing losses or demand declines in certain businesses, indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable. When indicators that the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable are triggered, we evaluate the carrying value of the asset group in relation to its expected undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying value of an asset group is greater than the expected undiscounted future cash flows to be generated by the asset group, an impairment charge is recognized based on the excess of the asset group’s carrying value over its fair value. If it is determined that the carrying value of an asset group is recoverable, we review and adjust, as necessary, the estimated useful lives of the assets in the group. If there were to be a triggering event, it is possible that we could record significant non-cash long-lived asset impairment or accelerated depreciation charges in future periods, which would be recorded as operating expenses and would negatively impact our results of operations.
We also may be disposing of assets or businesses and be required to recognize additional impairment charges based on the excess of the asset group’s carrying value over the expected net proceeds from the sale, which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We could be required to record goodwill impairment charges on all or a significant amount of the goodwill on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.
We have goodwill of $81$31 million recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017,2020, all of which arose from our acquisition of Atlas Tissue.the U.S. Sawmill Business. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the estimated fair valuevalues of identifiable tangible and intangible assets of the acquired business. Future acquisitions that we make may also result in significant amounts of additional goodwill. The determination of goodwill involves a significant leveljudgment and assumptions including the assessment of management estimates about futurethe results of the most recent fair value calculations, the identification of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, specific events requires complexaffecting us and subjective judgments,the business, and is subject to a fair degreemaking the assessment on whether each relevant factor will impact the impairment test positively or negatively, and the magnitude of measurement uncertainty.any such impact. The carrying value of goodwill is not amortized, and is reviewedtested for impairment at the reporting unitunit’s level annually, or more frequently whenever indicators ofif events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment exist.loss. In the event that the net carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill which would be recorded as operating expenses and would negatively impact our results of operations.in that reporting unit.
We could be required to record additional valuation allowances against our recorded deferred income tax assets.
We recorded significant deferred income tax assets relating to our Canadian operations in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017.2020. If, in the future, we determine that we are unable to recognize these deferred income tax assets as a result of sustained cumulative losses in our Canadian operations, we could be required to record additional valuation allowances for the portion of the deferred income tax assets that is not more likely than not to be realized. Such valuation allowances, if taken, would be recorded as a charge to income tax expenseprovision and would negativelyadversely impact our results of operations.
Legal and Compliance RiskRisks
Legal and compliance risks arise from governmental and regulatory action, governanceoperations and business conduct, and environmental, contractual and other legal liabilities, including risks associated with: international trade regulation; legal proceedings; our shareholder relationships; commitments to customers, suppliers or other stakeholders; and compliance with securities, governance and other laws and regulations, policies and procedures, such as those relating to financial reporting and disclosure obligations, the environment, andforest management, health and safety.safety, marketing, product safety and liability, and privacy and antitrust. Governmental and regulatory risk includes the risk that government or regulator actions will impose additional costs on us or cause us to have to change our operations and business models or practices.
19

Table of Contents
Products we produce in one country and export to another may become subject to duties or other international trade remedies or restrictions.
We produce products in the U.S. and Canada, and we sell those products worldwide. Under international agreements and the domestic trade laws of many countries, trade remedies are available to domestic industries where imports are alleged to be “dumped” or “subsidized” and such imports are alleged to cause material injury, or an imminent threat of injury, to a domestic industry. Under such laws, dumping generally involves selling for export a product at a price lower than that at which the same or similar product is sold in the home market of the exporter, or where the export prices are lower than a value that typically must be at or above the full cost of production (including sales and marketing costs) and a reasonable amount for profit. International trade laws also generally provide that subsidies from governments may be subject to trade remedies under certain circumstances. A trade remedy investigation or proceeding may involve allegations of either dumping, subsidization, or both. Where injurious dumping is found, the trade remedy is typically an anti-dumping duty order. Where injurious subsidization is found, the trade remedy is typically a countervailing duty order. In principle, a duty equal to the amount of dumping or subsidization, as applicable, isshould be imposed on the importer of the product. However, whether or not consistent with treaty

obligations or other applicable law, authorities have imposed assumed or estimated rates on products that may not be related to actual dumping by a particular producer or may not be based on subsidies actually received by the producer. Anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders do not prevent the export or import of the product, but rather require the importer of the product to pay to the government an anti-dumping duty or countervailing duty, or a deposit on estimated anti-dumping duties or countervailing duties, as applicable. The imposition of additional anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, deposit requirements in respect of estimated duties, or any other trade remedy on one or more of our products could materially affect our cash flow, and the competitive position of our operations relating to the affected product.
In addition to risks related to the trade remedies discussed above, a country could impose taxes or tariffs on some or all imported products, whether or not consistent with existing trade treaties or agreements, and trade treaties, agreements and arrangements may be renegotiated or terminated, or one or more countries that are parties may withdraw. For example, the U.S. government is seeking to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), to which Canada is a party and which generally provides for free trade of many products and services among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. There is also uncertainty as to whether the U.S. may unilaterally withdraw from NAFTA altogether. It is uncertain whether a new trade agreement resulting from such ongoing efforts to renegotiate NAFTA, or any unilateral withdrawal from NAFTA by the U.S., will affect the import of any of our Canadian products to the U.S. However, we sell a significant portion of our Canadian produced products in the U.S., and a renegotiated NAFTA or a unilateral withdrawal from NAFTA by the U.S., or similarSuch actions with respect to other trade treaties, agreements, or arrangements taken by other countriesany country where we sell our products internationally, could materially affect our cash flow, and the competitive position of our operations relating to the affected products.
We are subject to countervailing orand anti-dumping dutiesduty orders on our U.S. imports of paper products and substantially allthe vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian mills,sawmills, which could materially affect our operations and cash flows.
Substantially allThe vast majority of our U.S. imports of SC paper, UGW paper, and softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian millssawmills are subject to one or more orders requiring us to pay cash deposits to the U.S. for estimated countervailing orand anti-dumping duties. All of suchThese cash deposit requirements applicable to us are the result of petitions filed by U.S. SC paper, UGW paper, or softwood lumber products producers as applicable,and forest landowners with the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”(or, “Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”). Each such petition resulted in Commerce and the ITC commencing investigations into all Canadian producers of the applicable products, and, in each investigation, at least one of our Canadian subsidiaries was selected as a mandatory respondent.
In a countervailing duty investigation, when Commerce determines that the Canadian production of the applicable product benefited from government subsidies during the applicable time period it sets an estimated countervailing duty rate for that product. Similarly, in an anti-dumping duty investigation, when Commerce determines that the Canadian product is being dumped in the U.S. market during the applicable time period, it sets an estimated anti-dumping duty rate for that product. A U.S. importer of such products from Canada is then required to pay the cash deposits for estimated countervailing or anti-dumping duties at such rates for an initial period of four months, and will then continue to be required to pay the cash deposits only if, in the applicable investigation, all of the following occur:
Commerce issues final determinations that importers to the U.S. of such products are importing unfairly traded goods from Canadian mills;
the ITC issues a final determination that subject merchandise benefiting from any alleged subsidization or dumping threatens injury to the relevant U.S. industry or causes current injury; and
Commerce issues orders that importers of such products in the U.S. from Canadian mills must pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing or anti-dumping duties, as applicable.Commission.
No such deposits paid to the U.S. will be converted into actual countervailing duties or anti-dumping duties unless and until a countervailing duty or anti-dumping rate is later set by Commerce in an administrative review, which is to be based on Commerce’s determinationall appeals of countervailable subsidies received during, or anti-dumping rates applicable to, a period subsequent to the period reviewedfinal determinations and orders have been exhausted. We requested and participated in the original investigation. In those investigations in which we are or become required to pay cash deposits for estimated duties, we will become eligible to request a first and second administrative review 12 months after the date of any Commerce order implementing a duty deposit requirement, as described above,reviews and in each such investigation, we could remain subject to annual administrative reviews for five or more years following the initial Commerce order. We may also appeal final determinations and deposits cannot be converted into actual duties during the pendency of an appeal.orders.
We have been required to pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports of SC paper produced at our Canadian mills since August 3, 2015. As of December 31, 2017, the applicable rate for such estimated duties was 17.87%. We also became required to pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties on the vast majority of our U.S. imports

of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills, since April 28, 2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2018, the rates for such estimated countervailing and anti-dumping duties were 14.7%14.70% and 3.2%3.20%, respectively. Additionally, since January 16, 2018, we have been required to pay cash deposits toCommerce issued its final results in the U.S. at a preliminary rate of 4.42% for estimated countervailing duties first administrative review on December 1, 2020 and its final results in the anti-dumping first administrative review on November 30, 2020 and established our U.S. imports of UGW paper producednew rates at our Canadian mills. The19.10% for countervailing duties and 1.15% for anti-dumping duties. These rates will apply until Commerce sets new duty and anti-dumping investigations of UGW paper producedrates in Canada are atsubsequent administrative reviews, or new rates may be set through a preliminary stage, and it is uncertain at the conclusion of those investigations, at what rate, if any, we will be required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. for estimated countervailing or anti-dumping dutiesremand determination by a United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement binational panel (or, “Panel”) on our imports to the U.S. of UGW paper produced at our Canadian mills.appeal. Through December 31, 2017,2020, our aggregate cash deposits paid to the U.S. for all affected products totaled $75$243 million.
We cannot provide any assurance regarding the estimated or final duty rates that may be determined by Commerce in its investigations orfuture administrative reviews. During any period in which our U.S. imports of SC paper, UGW paper, or softwood lumber products from our Canadian millssawmills are subject to countervailing duty or anti-dumping cash deposit requirements or duty requirements, our cash flows and the competitive position of those products and our related Canadian operations could be materially affected.
20

Table of Contents
Any failure to comply with laws and regulations could require us to incur or record additional liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to a variety of foreign, federal or national, state, provincial, and local laws and regulations dealing with financial reporting and disclosure obligations, corporate governance, antitrust, customs and trade, employees, contractors, transportation, taxes, timber and water rights, pensions, benefit plans, workplace health and safety, the manufacture and sale of consumer products, including product safety and liability, the environment, and First Nations,Indigenous peoples, among others. Many of these laws and regulations are complex and subject to differing interpretation, and the requirements of laws and regulations of different countries and jurisdictions in which we operate, have sales or otherwise do business, or in which our securities trade or in which our security holders reside, may differ or be inconsistent with one another. Compliance with these laws and regulations, including changes to them or their interpretations or enforcement, or introduction of new laws and regulations, has required in the past, and could require in the future, substantial expenditures by us and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, noncompliance with laws and regulations, especially those related to the environment and First Nations,Indigenous peoples, could significantly damage, and require us to spend substantial amounts of money to rebuild our reputation.
In addition, our ability to comply with these laws and regulations often depends, at least in part, on compliance by independent third parties, such as contractors and agents we retain to provide services. For example, our compliance with customs requirements for international shipments depends in part on compliance by our customs brokers, sureties, transportation companies, and external advisors, in addition to our own employees and consultants, and we could be liable for noncompliance by any of them, even if inadvertent. Failure to comply with laws and regulations can also be the result of unintended consequences, such as unforeseen consequences of information technology modifications, upgrades, or replacements. Although we strive to comply with laws and regulations applicable to us, no company, including us,ours, can assure that it will successfully prevent, detect, or remediate all potential instances of non-compliance, and any failure to do so could be material, require substantial expenditures, and adversely affect our results of operations.
As an owner of real estate and manufacturing and processingindustrial facilities, we could be required to incur or record additional environmental and related health and safety liabilities.
As an owner and operator of real estate and manufacturing and processingindustrial facilities, we are subject in particular, to a wide range of general and industry-specific laws and regulations relating to pollution and the protection of the environment, as well as several requirements stipulated in our facilities’ permits, including those governing air emissions, water usage, wastewater discharges, timber harvesting, the storage, management and disposal of regulated substances and waste, the investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites, landfill and lagoonwastewater treatment system operation and closure, forestryforest management and operations, endangered species and their habitat, and health and safety.safety, carbon pricing and climate change. Changes to our operations and costs to comply with these laws and regulations may increase as the requirements of these laws and regulations evolve. Noncompliance with these regulations or permit conditions can result in significant civil, administrative or criminal fines or penalties, or regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations. This may include liability under environmental laws for cleanup, improvement or change of pollution control equipment, and other costs and damages, including investigation costs, tort liability and damages to natural resources, resulting from past or present spills, releases or threats of releases of regulated substances and waste on or from our current or former properties.properties or operations. We may also be liable under health and safety laws for related exposure of employees, contractors and other persons to substances and waste on or from our current or former properties.properties or injuries. We may incur liability under these laws without regard to whether we knew of, were responsible for, or owned the property at the time of, any exposure, spill, release or threats of releases of any regulated substances or waste on or from any current or former property, or at properties where we arranged for the disposal of regulated materials.materials or waste. Claims or liability may also arise out of currently unknown environmental conditions, obligations arising as a result of new or revised rules or regulations (e.g. regulation of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, or “PFAS”) or aggressive enforcement efforts by government regulators, public interest groups or private parties. As a result, we may be required to incur or record additional environmental or related health and safety liabilities.

Our international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls, and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations.
As a result of our international sales and operations, we are required to comply with trade and economic sanctions and other restrictions imposed by the United States,U.S., Canada, and other governments or organizations. We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada), the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010 and other anti-bribery laws that generally bar bribes or unreasonable gifts to foreign governments or officials and, in some jurisdictions, to other commercial parties. Changes in trade sanctions laws could restrict our business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned entities, and may result in modifications to compliance programs. Violations of these laws or regulations could result in sanctions, including fines, loss of authorizations
21

Table of Contents
needed to conduct our international business, and other penalties, as well as result in a default under certain of our financing agreements, each of which could adversely impact our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We are and may become a party to a number of legal proceedings, claims, governmental inquiries, investigations, and other disputes, and adverse judgments in certain legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We become involved in various legal proceedings, claims, governmental inquiries, investigations, and other disputes in the normal course of business. These could include, for example, matters related to contracts, transactions, commercial and trade disputes, taxes, environmental issues, activist damages, employment and workers’ compensation claims, grievances, human rights complaints, pension and benefit plans and obligations, health and safety, product safety and liability, asbestos exposure, intellectual property, financial reporting and disclosure obligations, corporate governance, Indigenous peoples’ claims, antitrust, First Nations claims,governmental regulations, and other matters. In addition to claims against us and our consolidated subsidiaries, these proceedings and disputesmatters may involve claims asserted by others against unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures in which we have an interest. Although the final outcome of any legal proceeding or disputethese matters is subject to many variables and cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty, we regularly assess the status of the matters and establish provisions (including legal costs expected to be incurred) when we believe an adverse outcome is probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect if not resolved in our favor, or that we believe to be significant, are discussed in Item 3 of this Form 10-K and in Note 16,18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Legal Matters”matters” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, our reports do not disclose or discuss all legal proceedings and disputesmatters of which we are aware. If our assessment of the probable outcome or materiality of a legal proceeding or disputematter is not correct, we may not have made adequate provision for such loss and our financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations could be adversely impacted.
In addition, if a loss resulting from an adverse outcome in connection with a legal proceeding or disputematter were to affect the solvency of certain of our subsidiaries or remain unpaid for certain periods, it could result in a default under the ABL Credit Facility, the Senior Secured Credit Facility, or the indenture governing the 2026 Notes and the 2023 Notes.Loan Facility. For additional information, see “Financial RiskRisks – The terms of our ABL Credit Facility, our Senior Secured Credit Facility, and the indenture governing our 20232026 Notes and our Loan Facility could restrict our current and future operations”operations, and changes relating to LIBOR could impact our borrowings under some of these facilities” above.
Some legal proceedings and disputesmatters that we may be involved in from time to time result from claims brought by us against third parties, including customers, suppliers, shareholders, governments or governmental agencies, activists and others. Even if such a legal proceeding or disputematter does not involve a claim for damages or other penalty or remedial action against us, such a proceeding or disputematter could nevertheless adversely affect our relationships with those and other third parties.
There is a shareholder who owns a substantial percentage of our common stock, and its interests could differ from those of other stockholders, and its actions could affect the price of our common stock.
There is a shareholder who owns a substantial percentage of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and could increase its percentage ownership even further. This shareholder could be in a position to influence the outcome of actions requiring shareholder approval, including, among other things, the election of board members. The concentration of ownership could also facilitate or hinder a negotiated change of control and consequently, impact the value of our common stock. In addition, the possibility that this shareholder may sell all or a large portion of our common stock in a short period of time may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
22

Table of Contents
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Information regarding our owned properties is included in Item 1, “Business.”
In addition to the properties that we own, we also lease under long-term leases office and manufacturing premises, andmachinery, chemical equipment, office equipment, and rail cars, have water rights on certain government-owned waters, and have harvesting rights or timber supply guarantees with respect to certain government-owned land. For additional information, see Note 19,12, “Operating LeasesLeases” and Purchase Obligations,Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Commitments,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We hold the properties that we own or lease, and the rights and supply guarantees described above, through various operating subsidiaries, including our principal U.S. operating subsidiary, Resolute FP US Inc., and our principal Canadian operating subsidiary, Resolute FP Canada Inc., and Resolute Growth Canada Inc., which holds or operates assets related to our growth and diversification initiatives in Canada, including our Ontario sawmills and wood pellet facility, as well as our Saint-Félicien pulp mill. For a list of our subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020, see Exhibit 21.1, “Subsidiaries of the registrant,” of this Form 10-K.
The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are secured by a first priority mortgage on the real property of our Calhoun facility and a first priority security interest on the fixtures and equipment located therein,therein. On November 13, 2019, a legal hypothec in the amount of C$30 million ($24 million) was registered on our Saint-Félicien immovable and related assets.movable property, for more information see Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Legal matters – Fibrek acquisition,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In addition to the proceedings described below, seeSee the description of our material pending legal proceedings in Note 16,18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Legal matters,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated in this “Item 3 – Legal Proceedings” by reference.
The Autorité des marchés financiers, the securities regulatory authority in the Province of Quebec (the “AMF”), has authorized Resolute to disclose that the AMF is conducting an investigation of Resolute into the possibility of non-compliance with the Securities Act and its applicable regulations relating to takeover bid rules and the possibility of illegal insider trading and tipping in connection with the December 15, 2011 offer by Resolute to purchase the shares of Fibrek Inc. (the “Offer”). Resolute has been informed by the AMF that the possibility of illegal insider trading does not involve any personal trading by its directors or officers in the shares of Fibrek, nor of Resolute, during the relevant period. Further details concerning the investigation are, by law and by order of the AMF, not permitted to be disclosed. Resolute is fully cooperating with the investigation and is of the view that it complied with all applicable securities laws. However, if the AMF commences legal proceedings against Resolute or any of its officers or directors, no assurance can be given at this time by Resolute as to the outcome.
Resolute adds that allegations concerning the possibility of non-compliance by Resolute with take-over bid rules were made by Fibrek in hearings in January-March 2012 before the Bureau de décision et de révision in the context of Resolute’s applications to cease trade shareholder rights plans (poison pills) and other defensive measures adopted by Fibrek in response to the Offer. The Bureau de décision et de révision is Quebec’s administrative tribunal specialized in financial markets.
On October 13, 2016, Environment Canada charged our subsidiary, Resolute FP Canada Inc., with alleged violations of Section 36(3) of the Fisheries Act (Canada), which prohibits the deposit or discharge of deleterious substances in water frequented by fish. The charges were based on an alleged discharge of bunker fuel into a stream, alleged to have occurred at our Baie-Comeau paper mill on June 19, 2012. On October 12, 2017, the Company settled the case, agreeing to plead guilty to the deposit of a deleterious substance in water frequented by fish and to pay a fine of Cdn $100,000.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

23

Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock trades under the stock symbol “RFP” on both the NYSE and the TSX.
The high and low prices of our common stock on the NYSE for 2016 and 2017, by quarter, are set forth below.
 HighLow
2016      
First quarter$8.40
 $3.79
 
Second quarter 6.95
  4.55
 
Third quarter 6.10
  4.57
 
Fourth quarter 5.85
  3.70
 
2017      
First quarter$5.80
 $4.20
 
Second quarter 6.75
  4.15
 
Third quarter 5.30
  4.10
 
Fourth quarter 11.30
  5.04
 
As of January 31, 2018,29, 2021, there were approximately 3,1692,377 holders of record of our common stock.
We did not declare or pay any dividends on our common stock in both 2017 and 2016.2020 or 2019. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual and legal restrictions, business prospects and other factors that the board of directors considers relevant. Our debt agreements contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and repurchase shares, as further described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and AnalysisNote 15, “Long-Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
On March 2, 2020, our board of Financial Condition and Resultsdirectors authorized a share repurchase program of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Resources,”up to 15% of our common stock, for an aggregate consideration of up to $100 million. In 2020, we repurchased 6.9 million shares at a cost of $30 million under this Form 10-K.
There remainsprogram. In 2019, we repurchased 4.8 million shares at a cost of $24 million, undercompleting our $150 million share repurchase program which was launched in May of 2012. We did not
The following table sets forth information about our stock repurchases for the three months ended December 31, 2020:
PeriodTotal Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 1 to October 311,066,988 $4.71 1,066,988 $75,866,143 
November 1 to November 30877,799 $4.92 877,799 $71,546,792 
December 1 to December 31191,029 $5.69 191,029 $70,460,359 
Total2,135,816 $4.88 2,135,816 $70,460,359 
(1)$100 million share repurchase any sharesprogram launched in 2017 or 2016.2020.
See Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” for information regarding our equity compensation plan.

24

Table of Contents
The following graph compares the cumulative total return attained by shareholders of our common stock versus the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor’s 500 (the “S(or, the “S&P 500”500) index and a peer group of five companiesthe Peer Group (as defined below), since December 31, 2012. The individual companies comprising the peer group are: Domtar Corporation, International Paper Company, UPM-Kymmene Corporation, Verso Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company.2015. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock, in the S&P 500 index, and in the peer groupPeer Group on December 31, 20122015 (with the reinvestment of all dividends) to December 31, 2017.2020. The stock price performance included in the graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
rfp-20201231_g1.jpg

(1)The information contained in this stock performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or, the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
(2)The group of individual peer companies comprising the peer group (or, the “Peer Group”) are: Clearwater Paper Corporation, Domtar Corporation, Verso Corporation, Mercer International Incorporated, Rayonier Advanced Materials, Canfor Corporation, Interfor Corporation, Western Forest Products Inc and West Fraser Timber Company Limited. Conifex Timber Incorporated is no longer considered in the Peer Group.
25

Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents a summary of historical consolidated financial information for each of the last five years and should be read in conjunction with Items 7 and 8 of this Form 10-K. The selected financial information for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, and as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, under the captions “Statement of Operations Data,” “Segment Sales Information,” “Statement of Cash Flows Data” and “Financial Position” shown below has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts)20202019201820172016
Statement of Operations Data
Sales$2,800 $2,923 $3,756 $3,513 $3,545 
Operating income (loss)$99 $17 $379 $42 $(18)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests$10 $(47)$235 $(78)$(76)
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$10 $(47)$235 $(84)$(81)
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$0.12 $(0.51)$2.57 $(0.93)$(0.90)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$0.12 $(0.51)$2.52 $(0.93)$(0.90)
Dividend declared per common share$ $— $1.50 $— $— 
Segment Sales Information
Market pulp$668 $797 $1,085 $911 $836 
Tissue173 165 130 81 89 
Wood products1,025 616 823 797 596 
Paper934 1,345 1,718 1,724 2,024 
 $2,800 $2,923 $3,756 $3,513 $3,545 
Statement of Cash Flows Data
Net cash provided by operating activities$334 $85 $435 $158 $81 
Cash invested in fixed assets$78 $113 $155 $164 $249 
Disposition of assets$14 $$336 $21 $
As of December 31,
(In millions, except otherwise indicated)20202019201820172016
Financial Position
Fixed assets, net$1,441 $1,459 $1,515 $1,716 $1,842 
Total assets$3,730 $3,626 $3,935 $4,147 $4,227 
Total debt$561 $449 $645 $789 $762 
Additional Information
Number of employees7,100 6,700 7,400 7,700 8,300 
26
 Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts) 2017
  2016
  2015
  2014
  2013
 
Statement of Operations Data               
Sales $3,513
  $3,545
  $3,645
  $4,258
  $4,461
 
Operating income (loss) 49
  (26)  (219)  (174)  (2) 
Net loss including noncontrolling interests (78)  (76)  (255)  (274)  (639) 
Net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (84)  (81)  (257)  (277)  (639) 
Basic net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.93)  (0.90)  (2.78)  (2.93)  (6.75) 
Diluted net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.93)  (0.90)  (2.78)  (2.93)  (6.75) 
Dividends declared per common share 
  
  
  
  
 
Segment Sales Information               
Market pulp $911
  $836
  $889
  $974
  $1,053
 
Tissue 81
  89
  11
  
  
 
Wood products 797
  596
  536
  610
  569
 
Newsprint 842
  1,009
  1,105
  1,402
  1,473
 
Specialty papers 882
  1,015
  1,104
  1,272
  1,366
 
  $3,513
  $3,545
  $3,645
  $4,258
  $4,461
 
Statement of Cash Flows Data               
Net cash provided by operating activities $158
  $81
  $138
  $186
  $206
 
Cash invested in fixed assets 164
  249
  185
  193
  161
 

Table of Contents
 As of December 31,
(In millions, except otherwise indicated) 2017
  2016
  2015
  2014
  2013
 
Financial Position               
Fixed assets, net $1,716
  $1,842
  $1,810
  $1,985
  $2,289
 
Total assets 4,147
  4,277
  4,220
  4,914
  5,377
 
Total debt (1)
 789
  762
  591
  590
  591
 
Additional Information               
Number of employees 7,700
  8,300
  8,000
  7,700
  8,400
 
(1)
In 2016, we entered into the Senior Secured Credit Facility for up to $185 million, which included a term loan of $46 million. Borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and ABL Credit Facility were $90 million and $35 million, respectively, in 2016, and $83 million and $61 million, respectively, in 2017. For additional information, see Note 13, “Long-Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following management’s discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand Resolute Forest Products, our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. The discussion is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes (or, the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) contained in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (or, “Form 10-K”).
When we refer to “Resolute Forest Products,” “Resolute,” “we,” “our,” “us”“us,” or the “Company,” we mean Resolute Forest Products Inc. with its subsidiaries, and affiliates, either individually or collectively, unless otherwise indicated.
OVERVIEW
Resolute Forest Products is a global leader in the forest products industry with a diverse range of products, including market pulp, tissue, wood products, newsprint and specialty papers,paper, which are marketed in close to 70over 50 countries. The companyCompany owns or operates some 40 manufacturing facilities, as well as power generation assets, in the U.S. and Canada. We produce lumber in the U.S. and Canada, and we are the largest Canadian producer of wood products east of the Canadian Rockies, and one of the most significant pulp producers in North America. By capacity, we are the number one producer of newsprint in the world and the largest producer of uncoated mechanical papers in North America, and a competitive pulp producer in North America. We are also a leading global producer of newsprint and an emerging tissue producer. Resolute has third-party certified 100% of its managed woodlands to internationally recognized sustainable forest management standards.
We report our activities in fivefour business segments: market pulp, tissue, wood products, newsprint and specialty papers.paper. We believe an integrated approach across these segments maximizes value creation for our Company and stakeholders.
We are guided by our vision and values, focusing on safety, sustainability, profitability, accountability, sustainability and teamwork. These areWe believe we can be distinguished by the elements that we believe best define us:following competitive strengths:
Competitive cost structure combined with diversified and diversifiedintegrated asset base - With our
large-scale efficient and integrated operations, competitive sources of energy and fiber, strategically located mills, and cost-effective management structure, we believe we are well positionedoperations, including significant internal energy production from cogeneration and hydroelectric facilities, which support our value proposition;
control over fiber transformation chain from standing timber to competeend-product for the majority of our offering;
nearly 100% of our products sourced from high-quality virgin fiber;
harvesting rights for the majority of fiber needs in the global marketplace. We maintain a rigorous focus on reducing costs, optimizing production across our network, adjustingCanada; and
sophisticated logistics capabilities to market dynamics, as well as capitalizing on our access to international markets.
meet demanding customer expectations.
Solid balance sheet
Conservative capital structure - Our low debt, which has favorable pricing and flexibility and solidunder borrowing agreements together with our liquidity levels are keysupport ability to weather challenging market cycles and to execute our continued transformation strategy;
significant tax assets to defer cash income taxes and provide synergies to execute this strategy; and
customers benefit from a more sustainable company. In order to maintain financial strengthfinancially stable and flexibility, we continue to spend our capitalreliable business partner in a disciplined, strategicchallenging industry.
Seasoned management team
deep industry expertise, with influential leaders in forestry, operations, environmental risk management and focused manner, concentrating on our most competitive sites.public policy;
culture of accountability, encouraging transparency and straightforwardness; and
core identity tied to renewable resources we harvest in a truly sustainable manner.
Strategic perspectives - We pursue initiatives that improve our cost position, advance diversification, provide synergies or position us to expand into future growth markets. All are key to our continuing transformation: less paper and more wood products, pulp and tissue. To that end, we take an opportunistic approach that aligns with our strategic plan and that we believe positions us favorably for the long-term evolution
27

Table of the paper and forest products industry, including bioproducts.Contents
Our Business
Products
We operate seven pulp mills, five in the U.S.For information on our products, see Part I, Item 1, “Business – Products” of this Form 10-K.
Strategy and two in Canada, with total capacity of 1.7 million metric tons, or approximately 10% of total North American capacity, making us the third largest pulp producer in North America. Approximately 75% of our virgin pulp capacity is softwood-based: northern bleached softwood kraft (or “NBSK”) pulp, southern bleached softwood kraft (or “SBSK”) pulp and fluff pulp. We are also the world’s largest producer of recycled bleached kraft (or “RBK”) pulp and a competitive producer of northern bleached hardwood kraft (or “NBHK”) pulp and southern bleached hardwood kraft (or “SBHK”) pulp. Wood pulp is the most commonly used material to make paper and tissue. Pulp not converted into paper or tissue is sold as market pulp, which is used to make a range of consumer products including tissue, packaging, specialty paper products, diapers and other absorbent products. Approximately 28% of our 2017 market pulp shipments were exported outside of North America, including significant exports to Europe, Asia and Latin America.
We produce tissue products at three facilities in North America. With total capacity of 128,000 short tons (116,000 metric tons), which includes our new tissue facility in Calhoun (Tennessee), we are a fully integrated manufacturer operating four tissue machines and 14 converting lines. We manufacture a range of tissue products for the away-from-home and at-home markets, including recycled and virgin paper products, covering premium, value and economy grades. We also sell parent rolls not converted into tissue products.

In 2017, we shipped 1.9 billion board feet of construction-grade lumber within North America. Our sawmills produce dimension spruce-pine-fir lumber and provide wood chips to our pulp and paper mills in Canada. Our sawmills also supply wood residue to our other segments, to be used as fuel to produce electricity and steam based on renewable sources. We also operate two remanufactured wood products facilities that manufacture bed frame components, finger joints and furring strips, two engineered wood products facilities that manufacture I-joists for the construction industry, and one wood pellet facility, all of which are located in Quebec and Ontario.highlights
Our 1.8 million metric tons of capacity in newsprint represent approximately 8% of worldwide capacity and 43% of North American capacity. We sell newsprint to newspaper publishers worldwide and also to commercial printers in North America for uses such as inserts and flyers. In 2017, North American deliveries represented 62% of our total newsprint shipments.
We have 1.2 million short tons (1.1 million metric tons) of capacity in specialty papers, which include uncoated mechanical, coated mechanical and uncoated freesheet papers. In total, our 724,000 short tons (657,000 metric tons) of uncoated mechanical papers capacity make us the largest producer in North America, and the fourth largest in the world. With 345,000 short tons (313,000 metric tons) of capacity, we are North America’s third largest producer of coated mechanical papers.
Of our total specialty papers shipments, approximately one third is white paper, including high-bright and super high-bright papers, for general commercial printing, educational textbooks, digital printing and tradebooks. Coated mechanical papers, grades used for magazines, catalogs and advertising inserts, represent approximately 30% of our shipments. High-gloss uncoated mechanical (supercalendered, or “SC”) papers, mainly used for magazines, coupons, retail inserts and newspaper supplements, represent approximately one quarter. Uncoated freesheet papers, bag grades, papers for directories, paperback books and other commercial applications represent approximately 15% of our shipments. We sell our specialty papers almost exclusively in North America, where demand is largely tied to consumer spending and advertising.
Sales distribution by segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
  
Years Ended December 31,
 201720162015
Sales         
Market pulp 26%  24%  25% 
Tissue 2%  2%  % 
Wood products 23%  17%  15% 
Newsprint 24%  28%  30% 
Specialty papers 25%  29%  30% 
Total (%) 100%  100%  100% 
Total sales ($ millions)
$3,513
 $3,545
 $3,645
 
Strategy & recent highlights
Since 2011, our corporate strategy has beenis focused on transformingcontinuing to transform the company intoCompany away from mature product markets and products in structurally declining markets toward a more profitable and sustainable organization one that we believe can generate consistent value for shareholders throughover the long run, founded on a competitive portfolio of manufacturing assets and a solid presence in long-term growth markets. This includes, on the one hand, a gradual retreat from certain paper grades, and on the other, using our strong financial positionOur strategy is to act on opportunities to diversify and grow. This strategy has three core themes: maximizingdrive value generation from paper,creation by growing in pulp tissue, and wood products, and integrating our pulp into value-added quality tissue. In order to successfully execute this strategic plan, we also recognize the need to maintaintissue, investing in product innovation, and maximizing cash generation from our paper assets, while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation as well as a level of financial leverage and flexibility that supports the evolution of our transformation.
Maximizing value generation from paper
We compete today as a leading, lower-cost North American paper producer, due to continuous improvement and mill optimization. Maintaining this competitive advantage is a key focus. In order to remain competitive in the demand-challenged markets that our paper operations face, we strive to consistently:
maintain a stringent focus on reducing costs and optimizing our diversified asset base, including divesting idled and non-core assets or unprofitable operations;
maximize the benefits of our access to virgin fiber;
pursue a strategy of managing production and inventory levels and focus production at our most profitable and lower-cost facilities and machines; and

optimize our organizational structure to maintain a competitive selling, general and administrative expenses (or “SG&A”) to sales ratio.
allocation.
Growing in pulp tissue, and wood products
WeMarket pulp and wood products are core segments for the Company, and we believe in takingtheir long-term, sustained growth potential. We are confident in our ability to generate attractive returns for shareholders as operators of these assets. Our strategy is to take an opportunistic approach to these strategic initiatives, such as:
spending to improve productivity and/or lower costs;
investing selectively in organic expansions; and
pursuing only those that reduceopportunistic strategic acquisitions.
For example, in 2020, we acquired three sawmills in the U.S. South, with combined production capacity of 550 million board feet once ramped-up, giving us immediate scale in an attractive region and providing an opportunity to create value by maintaining appropriate working capital and by deploying our cost position, improve our product diversificationoperational expertise in sawmilling, with a focus on reliability, productivity and provide synergies. We believe that our market pulp, tissue, and wood products segments are aligned with those criteria, will benefit from long-term growth markets, and are therefore critical to our transformation strategy. Since 2011, we have completed a number of strategic initiatives in those segments, leading to a relative shift in our business away from our structurally-challenged paper business (comprised of newsprint and specialty papers) and into those growth markets (comprised of market pulp, tissue and wood products), as illustrated below.safety.

(1)
For a reconciliation of net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests to earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA,” and adjusted EBITDA, see note 1 under “Reconciliations” below.
Integrating our pulp into value-added quality tissue
Consistent with our overall business transformation strategy, we began our entry intoWe entered the tissue market in 2015 with the announcementconstruction of our plan to build a greenfield tissue facility at our Calhoun facility(Tennessee) site and the acquisition of Atlas Paper Holdings, Inc.two tissue mills and its subsidiaries (or “Atlas Tissue”). This significant strategic decision supportsa recovered paper facility in Florida. The purpose of our firm belief in addingdiversification into tissue is to add value throughwith the integration of our market pulp, particularly as paper utilizationprinting and writing demand for pulp continues its steadyto decline. In addition, weWe also believe that the tissue marketbusiness will provide a more stable source of revenue and profitability.
Our tissue operations are almost entirely supplied from our pulp mills, creating synergies and effectively minimizing risks associated with cyclical market pulp supply.pricing. For our Calhoun tissue facility, local pulp production is transferred directly transferred as slush pulp into the tissue operation, reducing process, energy, handling and logistics costs. Equipped with three modern converting lines sized specifically for the tissue machine, we sell converted products from theour Calhoun tissue facility targetingmostly sells converted products that target the fast growing premium private-label markets ofin the U.S.
Our transformation since 2011In December 2020, we completed the acquisition of a tissue converting facility located in Hagerstown, Maryland, with three bath tissue and towel converting lines. The Hagerstown assets will improve converting capacity, extend the Company's product offering and expand its territory in the attractive Northeast market.
28

Table of Contents
Investing in product innovation
Fiber from trees is summarized below:renewable, reusable and fossil-free, and we believe that it can serve as a core pillar in the ongoing shift away from fossil-based materials toward renewable alternatives. With our large-scale access to high-quality fiber, our expertise in managing its value-transformation chain and our strategically-located manufacturing facilities, we believe in investing in our business to build a competitive forest products company for the future.
(1)
By acquiring Fibrek Inc., we grew our market pulp capacity by over 70%, increasing our presence in a market that we believe will continue to grow over the long term.
(2)
We installed a 65 MW steam turbine at our Thunder Bay pulp and paper mill, which reduces the mill’s energy costs as well as maximizes our local woodlands, sawmill, pulp and paper, and energy operations by fully utilizing forest-based biomass to produce green electricity.
(3)
Our Ignace and Atikokan sawmills in Northern Ontario, as well as the acquisition of a second sawmill in Senneterre and resulting consolidation, have added more than 300 million board feet of annualized wood products capacity.
(4)
We acquired Atlas Tissue, gaining an immediate position in the North American consumer tissue market and access to a customer base to accelerate the sale and distribution of our Calhoun tissue production.

(5)
We completed a $100 million project to build a continuous pulp digester at the Calhoun pulp and paper mill, increasing our annual pulp capacity by 100,000 metric tons. This incremental capacity serves in part to supply slush pulp to our new Calhoun tissue machine (see note 6 below).
(6)
The Calhoun facility has a total annualized capacity of 66,000 short tons (60,000 metric tons) of at-home, premium bathroom tissue and toweling products, focused on the growing private-label market. The new tissue machine is expected to attain its targeted operational capacity in mid-2018.
Capital managementFor example, today we manufacture wood pellets used in renewable energy production from sawmill byproducts and, in partnership with a leading industry research organization, we recently launched an innovative pilot bio-refinery plant to produce lignin and cellulosic sugars for uses such as wood adhesives, animal feed and composites. In early 2020, we also announced the construction of a commercial plant to produce cellulose filaments, a new sustainable biomaterial derived from wood fiber that can be integrated into commercial and consumer products for many industries, including transportation, construction and energy, increasing the resistance and durability of those products. The cellulose filaments will be marketed with the help of Performance BioFilaments Inc., a joint venture established in 2014 by Resolute and Mercer International Inc., dedicated to the development of non-traditional applications for cellulose filaments.
We makesee certain megatrends around evolving customer preferences toward more renewable alternatives, urbanization and demographic changes that could open opportunities for our Company in value-added engineered wood products to capitalize on the growing role of wood in multi-family residential and commercial construction, as well as innovative fiber-derived products.
Maximizing cash generation from paper assets
Our high quality paper assets position us to compete effectively in the industry. This segment remains an important part of our business, generating cash to help finance our transformation strategy. In order to remain competitive in mature and declining markets that our paper operations face, we strive to consistently:
maintain a stringent focus on controlling costs and optimizing our performance;
manage production and inventory levels; and
focus production at our most profitable and lower-cost facilities and machines.
Disciplined approach to capital managementallocation
As we operate in a priority. Building oncapital-intensive and cyclical industry, we believe that the proper allocation of capital is a top priority, and that it should be done in a disciplined manner, with a view to maximize free cash flow through the business cycle and to generate attractive returns for our focus to reduce manufacturing costs, we will continue our efforts to decrease overhead, shareholders. Accordingly, we:
spend our capital in a disciplined, strategic and focused manner, concentratedconcentrating on our most competitive sites and the highest-return projects;
explore value-creating opportunities for incremental organic growth projects, segment extensions, bolt-on acquisitions, position-repurposing activities, divestitures, investments, join ventures, capital market transactions and other similar transactions in order to explore divestiture options for idledcalibrate and non-core assets, as well as unprofitable operations. Maintaining our strong financial position and financial flexibility is onemaximize the efficiency of our primary financial goals.
In 2013, we refinancedallocation of capital and other resources and optimize the remaining balancevalue of our business;
seek to maintain solid financial liquidity that over time is sufficient to support the evolution of our transformation strategy;
based on market conditions, seek to retire, repay or refinance our outstanding indebtedness with a view to reducing costs and enhancing our financial flexibility; and
return excess capital over time to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
29

Here is a summary of some of our key strategic initiatives since 2014:
rfp-20201231_g2.jpg
(1)With the acquisition of Atlas Paper Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (or, “Atlas”), we gained an immediate position in the North American consumer tissue market and access to a customer base to accelerate the sale and distribution of our Calhoun tissue production.
(2)Incremental pulp capacity from the pulp digester serves in part to supply slush pulp to our Calhoun tissue machine.
(3)The acquisition of three sawmills in the U.S. South from Conifex Timber Inc., with combined production capacity of 550 million board feet, gives us immediate scale in an attractive region, with quality assets in a rich fiber basket, close to growing end-markets. The facilities produce construction-grade dimensional lumber and decking products from locally sourced southern yellow pine for distribution within the U.S.
(4)Subsequent to year-end 2020, we issued $300 million unsecured senior secured notes due in 2026 with a 4.875% coupon, the proceeds of which, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem the $375 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (or the “2023 notes”). In addition to adding five years to maturity, the refinancing reduced our annual cash interest burden by $16 million and improves our financial flexibility.
In 2015, we refinanced our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (or “ABL credit facility”). The new five-year credit agreement provides more flexible terms and conditions, improves pricing and immediately lowers our cost of capital, to better support the execution of our growth and diversification initiatives.
In 2016, we entered into a senior secured credit facility (or “Senior secured credit facility”) for up to $185 million, comprised of a $46 million nine-year term loan (or “Term loan”) and a $139 million six-year revolving credit facility (or “Revolving credit facility”). This new facility increases our liquidity levels and will further enhance our flexibility in the execution of our growth and diversification strategy.
In 2014, we modified our U.S. other postretirement benefit (or “OPEB”) plans to encourage greater participation in a Medicare Exchange program. In addition to securing high-quality healthcare for participants, this modification, along with similar initiatives undertaken since mid-2013, helped to reduce our U.S. OPEB liability on the balance sheet from $250 million to $77 million as of December 31, 2014.
In 2016 and 2017, we undertook steps to optimize our pension plan contributions, as further discussed below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Employee Benefit Plans – Pension Funding,”reducing the volatility as well as the amount of required contributions. When compared to the baseline contributions of 2016, we estimate that pension contributions will drop by approximately $170 million between 2017 and 2020, including $30 million realized in 2017.
2023.
Sustainable performancedevelopment and developmentperformance
Our sustainability strategy is based on a balanced approach to environmental, social and economic performance, designed to enhance our competitive position. It is supported by public commitments in a number of key performance areas, focusing primarily on:
improving resource efficiency, which helps control wood fiber, fuel,chemical, and powerenergy costs, three significant input costs in our industry;
moving beyond regulatory compliance and environmental incident management to differentiate ourselves as an environmental supplier of choice;
positioning ourselvesResolute as a competitive employer in order to attract, engageemployer; and retain the best and brightest minds, promoting employee engagement, innovation and longevity; and
building solid community relations in our operating communities.
The overall responsibility for our sustainability performance resides with our president and chief executive officer, while we rely on our corporate sustainability committee to support long-term regional prosperitythe delivery of our key commitments and our own financialto implement related plans.
30

Table of Contents
As an industry leader, we are committed to maintaining effective sustainability oversight and operational success.management practices, and have moved beyond already rigorous regulatory compliance and environmental incident management to commit to transparency and annual sustainability reporting. The environmental, health and safety committee of the board of directors of the Company periodically reviews the Company’s strategies, activities, policies and communications regarding sustainability and other related matters, and makes recommendations to the board.
Our recent key sustainability achievements include:
BeatingAchieving world-class safety performance, close to the targets we set at the beginning of the year, even with the integration of our ambitious safety target by achieving anthree new U.S. sawmills. The Company’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) incident rate was 0.62 for the year, with a severity rate of 0.66 in 2017.16.8. Safety is our first priority, and we strive for zero injuries.
Achieving a 76%an 83.4% reduction in absolute greenhouse gas (or, “GHG) emissions (scope 1 and 2), below compared to 2000 levels.
levels, and setting a new target to reduce absolute GHG emissions by 30% against 2015 levels by 2025.

Sourcing three quarters of our energy from renewable sources, and producing one third of the energy we consume internally.
Joining forces with FPInnovationsAnnouncing the construction of a $20 million commercial cellulose filament plant, slated for completion in 2022, at our Kénogami (Quebec) paper mill. Cellulose filaments, a sustainable biomaterial derived from wood fiber, are manufactured entirely from renewable sources, resulting in a Cdn $21low carbon footprint.
Continuing implementation of a $45 million project to establish a biorefinery pilot plant hostedstrategic investment plan at our Thunder BaySaint-Félicien pulp mill to improve the operation, increase average daily production capacity, and reduce GHG emissions from the use of fossil fuels by 20%, or approximately 35,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year.
Increasing the energy efficiency of our facilities and lowering GHG emissions, including an initiative at our Dolbeau paper mill. The initiative will focus on developing new waysmill to efficiently produce and commercialize innovative biochemicals derived from wood.
Launching a clean energy project to improve our Thunder Bay mill’s energy efficiency and lower its GHG emissions. The mill plans to reduce itsdecrease the use of natural gas by recovering waste heat from its exhaust streams and optimizing condensate returns by installing efficient steam traps. By mid-2019, the Cdn $12 million project is expected to provide annual natural gas cost savings of more than 35%, while reducing the mill’s overall annual GHG emissions by over 20%, or approximately 43,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year.
Partnering with CO2 Solutions to deploy a CO2 capture unit and ancillary equipment to improve growth rates at Toundra Greenhouse in Saint-Félicien (Quebec), in which we hold a 49% interest.
Maintaining 100% certification of Resolute-owned or managed woodlands to internationally recognized forest management standards. 100% of our managed forests have been certified to one or more of two standards (Sustainable Forestry Initiative®, or “SFI®”,and/or Forest Stewardship Council®, or “FSC®”). Accordingly, our commitments extend well beyond strict compliance with applicable forestry regulations, which in Quebec and Ontario are already among the most, if not the most, rigorous in the world.
Maintaining fiber-tracking systems that allow us to identify the source of the fiber or wood used, allauxiliary boiler fueled with bunker C oil, equivalent to a reduction of 1,600 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year.
Deploying a carbon capture unit and ancillary equipment at our Saint-Félicien pulp mill to improve growth rates at Toundra Greenhouse, a state-of-the-art vegetable-growing complex in which have chainwe hold a 49% interest, and announcing its third expansion since opening in 2016: a $39 million investment that will create 55 new jobs, in addition to consolidating Toundra Greenhouse’s position as a major player in the province’s greenhouse industry.
Maintaining certification of custody certification. 100% of these tracking systemsResolute-owned or managed woodlands to at least one internationally recognized forest management standard (Sustainable Forestry Initiative®, or “SFI®”,and Forest Stewardship Council®, or “FSC®”). As a result, our commitments extend well beyond strict compliance with applicable forestry regulations, which in Quebec and Ontario are third-party certified according to one or more ofalready among the followingmost – if not the most – rigorous in the world.
Maintaining internationally recognized chain of custody standards: SFI,certifications at 100% of our certified manufacturing facilities (SFI, FSC, and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification, and/or FSC.PEFC™”), and completing multisite chain of custody certification for all of our tissue mills, including our Calhoun tissue operation.
Deploying our Regional Supplier Registry web portal to support the development of local, regional and Indigenous business in our Quebec operating communities as part of our commitment to further integrate sustainability practices into our procurement process.
Continuing to report climate change, water security and forestforests disclosures to CDP, (formerlyas we have done since 2006. We received an “A-” for our forests disclosures – the Carbon Disclosure Project).highest score achieved in this category by any North American forest products company – placing us at the leadership level and reflecting environmental best practices. We maintained management level scores for our climate change (“B-”) and water security (“B”) disclosures, reflecting the actions we have taken to evaluate and manage our risks in these categories. Full disclosures and scores are available on CDP’s website (https://www.cdp.net/)(www.cdp.net), though this information is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or, the “SEC”).
Continuing to implement our proactive approach to preventing environmental management by beating our class 1 and 2 environmental incident target, recording 13 incidents completing the second year of the second three-year cycle ofin 2020, and maintaining ISO 14001:2015 environmental risk auditsmanagement system certification at all100% of our pulp, papercertified operations.
Making new environmental commitments to include our wood products facilities in the Company’s GHG emissions inventory by 2022, develop scope 3 GHG emission commitments by working with suppliers and tissue mills. We recorded 18 environmental incidents (class 1other stakeholders, and 2)record fiber losses of no more than 40 kg per metric ton of production.
31

Table of Contents
Completing a consultative process of our internal and external stakeholders in 2017,order to assess, review and update our shared priorities, which inform our sustainability strategy and public commitments.
Adopting a 40%board-level diversity policy striving to maintain a minimum of 25% representation each of men and women, as well as an executive leadership-level diversity policy acknowledging diversity as a key factor in the Company’s talent management strategy. Currently there are two women on the board representing 29% of its membership.
Updating our Information Technology Security Policy, adopting a three-year continuous improvement comparedstrategy for managing data security and privacy, and making a commitment to 2016.review the strategy annually.
ActiveTraining 100% of all new employees on the Company's Code of Business Conduct, and committing to review it, as well as our Ethics Reporting Policy, on an annual basis.
Ensuring 100% of our operations reported their community outreach activities, including active engagement of union officials, employees, mayors and other community leaders, First NationsIndigenous partners, small community business owners, customers, and representatives of governments at various levels inlevels.
Maintaining long-term consultative and business relationships with close to 40 Indigenous communities and organizations.
Achieving our ongoing principled stand against activist misinformation.annual commitment to making community and charitable contributions of more than $1 million by contributing $1.1 million toward various community organizations, as well as more than $420,000 toward scholarships and research grants.
In addition to developingmaintaining information resources such as BorealForestFacts.com and The Resolute Blog, we continued engagementmaintained a social media presence with platforms such as Forum boréal and Boreal Forum. The information contained on or connected to BorealForestFacts.com , The Resolute Blog and the Forum boréal and Boreal Forum social media platforms. These Quebec and Ontario sites provide a forum for fact-based discussion concerning sustainable forestry practices and they help to ensure that individual and community voices are heard, particularly when it comes to the importance of forestry to Northern communities. The information contained on or connected to BorealForestFacts.com and The Resolute Blogplatforms is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.
Other sustainability performance indicators and disclosures prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (or “Initiative’s GRI”) guidelines Standards are available on our website (www.resolutefp.com)(www.resolutefp.com/sustainability). TheWe have reported publicly in accordance with GRI framework issince 2010. Such sustainability disclosures on our website are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the gold standard of balanced, transparent sustainability reporting.
SEC.
Our leadership and our sustainability accomplishmentsachievements have been recognized by independent organizations. In 2017,2020, we received extensive regional, North American and global recognition for our sustainability achievements.excellence and leadership in corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Some of the more noteworthy included:
the International Business Award (known as the “Stevies®”), the world’s premier business awards program, in the Best Health, Safety and Environment Program of the Year for the U.S. and Canada category (August 10, 2017);
the Best in Biz Awards International, the only independent global business awards program judged by prominent membersinclude:

The Environment + Energy Leader top project of the press and industry analysts,year award for our Thunder Bay thermomechanical pulp biorefinery (July 21, 2020);
The Business Intelligence Group’s BIG Award for Business for green company of the year in the Most Environmentally Responsible Company ofenterprise/manufacturing category (November 10, 2020);
The American Forest & Paper Association’s leadership in sustainability award in the Yearenergy efficiency/greenhouse gas reduction (large company) category (July 26, 2017)for the second consecutive year (November 13, 2020); and
In partnership with FPInnovations and Performance BioFilaments, a partnership award at the PeerADRIQ (Association pour le développement de la recherche et de l'innovation du Québec) Innovation Awards for Excellence, celebrating tangible accomplishments and innovative ideas in global business. Finalists present their initiatives for review by fellow finalists, a unique process that allows judging by an audience of peersour commercial plant specializing in the areasproduction of corporate responsibility, customer engagement, and people and performance. Resolute won a

Corporate Responsibility Award in the sustainability category, as well as an Industry Sector Award in the manufacturing category (March 24, 2017); and
the Mercure Award for Sustainable Developmentcellulose filaments at the 2017 Mercuriades Awards ceremony. Kénogami paper mill (November 19, 2020).
For a complete list of Resolute’s public sustainability commitments, visit our corporate website at www.resolutefp.com/sustainability. The company earned praise fromcommitments on our website are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the jury for its involvement in the Toundra Greenhouse project in Saint-Félicien, an innovative joint venture in which Resolute is oneSEC.

32

Table of the main partners. The Mercuriades, created by the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec in 1981, is the province’s most prestigious business competition, celebrating the ambition, innovation and performance of Quebec businesses (April 24, 2017).Contents
Power generation
We produce electricity at sevensix cogeneration facilities and seven hydroelectric dams. The output is consumed internally or sold under contract to third parties. This allows us to reduce our costs by generating energy internally at a lower cost compared to open market purchases, and by producing revenue from external sales.
This table provides a breakdown of the output capacity (based on installed capacity and operating expectations in 2018)2021) available for internal consumption at our existing production facilities:
  
  
Energy
INTERNAL CONSUMPTIONTypeCapacity
(MW)
Consumption
(MWh/Year)
Calhoun (Tennessee)Cogeneration64 337,000 
Coosa Pines (Alabama)Cogeneration25 155,000 
Hydro Saguenay (Quebec) (7 dams)Hydroelectric170 1,174,000 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)Cogeneration25 192,000 
  
  
Energy
INTERNAL CONSUMPTIONType
Capacity
(MW)
Consumption
(MWh/Year)
Calhoun (Tennessee)Cogeneration64
 384,000
 
Catawba (South Carolina)Cogeneration56
 337,000
 
Coosa Pines (Alabama)Cogeneration30
 159,000
 
Hydro Saguenay (Quebec) (7 dams)Hydroelectric170
 1,132,000
 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)Cogeneration25
 193,000
 
TheWe estimate that the approximate annualized cost savings to our operations attributable to internal consumption from our cogeneration assets and hydroelectric facilities is between $45$40 million and $50$45 million.
The table below shows the facilities where we currently produce electricity to sell externally as green power produced from renewable sources at favorable rates, almost all of which we buy back at lower rates for use in our operations:
  
  
Energy
EXTERNAL SALESTypeCapacity
(MW)
Annualized Sales
(MWh/Year)
Dolbeau (Quebec)Cogeneration28 193,000 
Gatineau (Quebec)Cogeneration15 106,000 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec)Cogeneration43 290,000 
Thunder Bay (Quebec)Cogeneration65 431,000 
  
  
Energy
EXTERNAL SALESType
Capacity
(MW)
Annualized Sales
(MWh/Year)
Dolbeau (Quebec)Cogeneration28
 194,000
 
Gatineau (Quebec)Cogeneration15
 109,000
 
Saint-Félicien (Quebec)Cogeneration43
 281,000
 
Thunder Bay (Ontario)Cogeneration65
 414,000
 
External sales generated from our cogeneration assets reduced cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs (or, “COS”), by $40$38 million, $45$36 million and $43$37 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

33

Table of Contents
Reconciliations2020 Overview
The table below showsImpact of the reconciliationCOVID-19 pandemic
We have sustained operations across all of net income (loss) including noncontrolling interestsour business segments through the COVID-19 pandemic, but we had to EBITDAtake certain measures in the face of the dramatic reduction in economic activity, particularly for marketing-dependent products like newspapers, inserts, flyers and adjusted EBITDA, whichcommercial paper. We continue to focus on key short-term priorities, including: operating under rigorous protocols around the health and safety of our employees, contractors and suppliers; reducing our paper production consistent with the dramatic decrease in economic activity affecting demand; maintaining disciplined liquidity management; monitoring customer credit risk; and controlling spending around selling, general and administrative (or, “SG&A”) expenses and capital expenditures. Specifically, as of December 31, 2020, we have reduced our operational footprint by temporarily idling paper machines representing in aggregate 28% of our run-rate capacity (equivalent to 48,000 metric tons per month). This decision led to workforce reductions and spending limitations or deferrals. We continue to monitor the market to adjust our capacity to market conditions.
Temporary idling of Amos and Baie-Comeau facilities
Due to the overall decrease in demand for newsprint, accelerated by the economic context surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, the Amos (Quebec) and Baie-Comeau (Quebec) paper mills have been temporarily idled since April 2020. As a result, we reassessed the remaining useful lives of the fixed assets and recognized an accelerated depreciation charge of $38 million and recognized additional provisions of $17 million. These charges are not financial measures recognized under generally accepted accounting principles, or “GAAP,”recorded in “Closure costs, impairment and other related charges” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. For more information on the calculation2020. We also recognized inventory write-downs of $25 million recorded in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and reasons we include these measures, see note 1 under “Resultsdistribution costs” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” below.
Year ended December 31, 2011Market PulpTissueWood ProductsNewsprintSpecialty PapersSegment TotalCorporate and OtherTotal
(Unaudited, in millions)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests$91
 $
 $(25) $89
 $122
 $277
 $(232) $45
 
Interest expense 
  
  
  
  
  
  95
  95
 
Income tax provision 
  
  
  
  
  
  19
  19
 
Depreciation and amortization 30
  
  33
  73
  84
  220
  
  220
 
EBITDA$121
 $
 $8
 $162
 $206
 $497
 $(118) $379
 
Foreign exchange loss 
  
  
  
  
  
  21
  21
 
Severance costs 
  
  
  
  
  
  12
  12
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 
  
  
  
  
  
  46
  46
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 
  
  
  
  
  
  3
  3
 
Net gain on disposition of assets 
  
  
  
  
  
  (3)  (3) 
Non-operating pension and OPEB costs 
  
  
  
  
  
  8
  8
 
Acquisition-related costs 
  
  
  
  
  
  5
  5
 
Other expense, net 
  
  
  
  
  
  27
  27
 
Adjusted EBITDA$121
 $
 $8
 $162
 $206
 $497
 $1
 $498
 
The table below shows the reconciliation of net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests to EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA, which are not financial measures recognized under GAAP, for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
Business acquisition
On February 1, 2020, we acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. all of the equity securities and membership interests in certain of its subsidiaries, the business of which consists mainly in the operation of three sawmills and related assets in Cross City (Florida) and in Glenwood and El Dorado (Arkansas) (or, the “U.S. Sawmill Business”). The U.S. Sawmill Business acquired produces construction-grade dimensional lumber and decking products from locally-sourced southern yellow pine for distribution within the U.S. This acquisition diversified our lumber production, and increased our operating capacity in the U.S. South. The fair value of the consideration, paid in cash, for the acquired U.S. Sawmill Business was $173 million. For more information, see Note 3, “Business Acquisition,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity and capital resources
On November 4, 2020, our Canadian subsidiary, Resolute FP Canada Inc., entered into a secured delayed draw term loan facility (or, the “Loan Facility”) with Investissement Québec as lender, for up to C$220 million ($173 million, based on the calculationexchange rate in effect on December 31, 2020), with an availability of C$165 million ($130 million) as at December 31, 2020, subject to certain conditions. As of December 31, 2020, the Loan Facility was undrawn.
On February 2, 2021, we completed the private offering (or, the "Offering") of $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.875% senior notes due 2026 (or, the “2026 Notes”) at an issue price of 100%. We used the net proceeds of the Offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all of the outstanding $375 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior notes due 2023 (or, the “2023 Notes”), at a price of 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and reasonsunpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. The redemption of the 2023 Senior Notes occurred on February 18, 2021.
See below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Resources” for more information.
Share repurchase program
On March 2, 2020, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to 15% of our common stock, for an aggregate consideration of up to $100 million. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we include these measures, see note 1repurchased 6.9 million shares at a cost of $30 million under Resultsthis program.
34

Table of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” below.
Year ended December 31, 2017Market PulpTissueWood ProductsNewsprintSpecialty PapersSegment TotalCorporate and OtherTotal
(Unaudited, in millions)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests$79
 $(6) $186
 $(23) $(9) $227
 $(305) $(78) 
Interest expense 
  
  
  
  
  
  49
  49
 
Income tax provision 
  
  
  
  
  
  84
  84
 
Depreciation and amortization 31
  5
  33
  66
  45
  180
  24
  204
 
EBITDA$110
 $(1) $219
 $43
 $36
 $407
 $(148) $259
 
Foreign exchange gain 
  
  
  
  
  
  (9)  (9) 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 
  
  
  
  
  
  87
  87
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 
  
  
  
  
  
  24
  24
 
Start-up costs 
  
  
  
  
  
  27
  27
 
Net gain on disposition of assets 
  
  
  
  
  
  (15)  (15) 
Non-operating pension and OPEB credits 
  
  
  
  
  
  (12)  (12) 
Other expense, net 
  
  
  
  
  
  3
  3
 
Adjusted EBITDA$110
 $(1) $219
 $43
 $36
 $407
 $(43) $364
 

2017 Overview
20172020 vs. 20162019
Our operating income was $49$99 million during the year, compared to an operating loss of $26$17 million in 2016.2019. Excluding special items, we generated operating income of $160$169 million in 2020, compared to $57$46 million in 2016.2019. Special items are described below.
Our net lossincome in 20172020 was $84$10 million, or $0.93$0.12 per diluted share, compared to $81net loss of $47 million, or $0.90$0.51 per share, in 2016.2019. Our net income for the year,2020, excluding special items, was $12$56 million, or $0.13$0.65 per diluted share, compared to a net loss excluding special items, of $12$46 million, or $0.13$0.50 per share, in 2016.2019.
Year Ended December 31, 2020Operating IncomeNet IncomeEPS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$99 $10 $0.12 
Adjustments for special items:
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges53 53 0.61 
Inventory write-downs related to closures25 25 0.29 
Start-up costs0.03 
Net gain on disposition of assets(11)(11)(0.13)
Other expense, net— 0.05 
Income tax effect of special items— (28)(0.32)
Adjusted for special items (1)
$169 $56 $0.65 
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2019Operating IncomeNet LossEPS
(In millions, except per share amounts)(In millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reportedGAAP, as reported$17 $(47)$(0.51)
Adjustments for special items:Adjustments for special items:
Closure costs, impairment and other related chargesClosure costs, impairment and other related charges18 18 0.19 
Inventory write-downs related to closuresInventory write-downs related to closures13 13 0.14 
Net gain on disposition of assetsNet gain on disposition of assets(2)(2)(0.02)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit creditsNon-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits— (47)(0.51)
Year Ended December 31, 2017Operating
Income
(Loss)
Net
Income
(Loss)
EPS  
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$49
 $(84) $(0.93) 
Adjustments for special items:       
Foreign exchange gain 
 (9) (0.10) 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 87
 87
 0.96
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 24
 24
 0.27
 
Start-up costs 27
 27
 0.30
 
Net gain on disposition of assets (15) (15) (0.17) 
Non-operating pension and OPEB credits (12) (12) (0.13) 
Other expense, net 
 3
 0.03
 Other expense, net— 22 0.24 
Income tax effect of special items 
 (9) (0.10) Income tax effect of special items— (3)(0.03)
Adjusted for special items (1)
$160
 $12
 $0.13
 
Adjusted for special items (1)
$46 $(46)$(0.50)
Year Ended December 31, 2016Operating
Income
(Loss)
Net
Income
(Loss)
EPS  
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$(26) $(81) $(0.90) 
Adjustments for special items:         
Foreign exchange loss 
  7
  0.08
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 62
  62
  0.69
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 7
  7
  0.08
 
Start-up costs 8
  8
  0.09
 
Net gain on disposition of assets (2)  (2)  (0.02) 
Non-operating pension and OPEB costs 8
  8
  0.09
 
Other income, net 
  (14)  (0.16) 
Income tax effect of special items 
  (7)  (0.08) 
Adjusted for special items (1)
$57
 $(12) $(0.13) 
(1)
Operating income (loss), net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share (or “EPS”), in each case as adjusted for special items, are not financial measures recognized under GAAP. We calculate operating income (loss), as adjusted for special items, as operating income (loss) from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for items such as closure costs, impairment and other related charges, inventory write-downs related to closures, start-up costs, gains and losses on disposition of assets, non-operating pension and OPEB costs and credits, and other charges or credits that are excluded from our segment’s performance from GAAP operating income (loss). We calculate net income (loss), as adjusted for special items, as net income (loss) from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for the same special items applied to operating income (loss), in addition to foreign exchange gains and losses, other income (expense), net, and the income tax effect of the special items. EPS, as adjusted for special items, is calculated as net income (loss), as adjusted for special items, per diluted share. We believe that using these non-GAAP measures is useful because they are consistent with the indicators management uses internally to measure the Company’s performance, and it allows the reader to more easily compare our operations and financial performance from period to period. Operating income (loss), net income (loss) and EPS, in each case as adjusted for special items, are internal

(1)Operating income (loss), net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share (or, “EPS”), in each case as adjusted for special items, are not financial measures recognized under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or, “GAAP”). We calculate operating income (loss), as adjusted for special items, as operating income (loss) from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for items such as closure costs, impairment and other related charges, inventory write-downs related to closures, start-up costs, and gains and losses on disposition of assets that are excluded from our segment’s performance from GAAP operating income (loss). We calculate net income (loss), as adjusted for special items, as net income (loss) from our Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for the same special items applied to operating income (loss), in addition to non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit (or, “OPEB”) costs and credits, other income and expense, net, and the income tax effect of the special items. EPS, as adjusted for special items, is calculated as net income (loss), as adjusted for special items, per diluted share. We believe that using these non-GAAP measures is useful because they are consistent with the indicators management uses internally to measure the Company’s performance, and it allows the reader to compare our operations and financial performance from period to period. Operating income (loss), net income (loss) and EPS, in each case as adjusted for special items, are internal measures, and therefore may not be comparable to those of other companies. These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as substitutes to financial measures determined under GAAP.
35

Table of Contents
Fourth Quarter Overview
Three months ended December 31, 20172020 vs. December 31, 20162019
Our operating income was $54$4 million in the quarter, compared to an operating loss of $18$69 million in the year-ago period. Excluding special items, we generatedincurred an operating income of $51$85 million in the quarter, compared to $14operating loss of $39 million in the year-ago period. Special items are described below.
Our net incomeloss in the quarter was $13$52 million, or $0.14$0.63 per share, compared to a net loss of $45$71 million, or $0.50$0.79 per share, in the year-ago period. Our net income in the quarter, excluding special items, was $14$45 million, or $0.15$0.55 per diluted share, compared to a net loss excluding special items, of $7$53 million, or $0.08$0.59 per share, in the year-ago period.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020Operating IncomeNet (Loss) IncomeEPS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$$(52)$(0.63)
Adjustments for special items:
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges55 55 0.67 
Inventory write-downs related to closures25 25 0.30 
Start-up costs0.04 
Net gain on disposition of assets(2)(2)(0.02)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit costs— 24 0.29 
Other expense, net— 28 0.34 
Income tax effect of special items— (36)(0.44)
Adjusted for special items (1)
$85 $45 $0.55 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2019Three Months Ended December 31, 2019Operating LossNet LossEPS
(In millions, except per share amounts)(In millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reportedGAAP, as reported$(69)$(71)$(0.79)
Adjustments for special items:Adjustments for special items:
Closure costs, impairment and other related chargesClosure costs, impairment and other related charges18 18 0.20 
Inventory write-downs related to closuresInventory write-downs related to closures13 13 0.14 
Net gain on disposition of assetsNet gain on disposition of assets(1)(1)(0.01)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit creditsNon-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits— (11)(0.12)
Three Months Ended December 31, 2017Operating
Income
(Loss)
Net
Income
(Loss)
EPS  
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$54
 $13
 $0.14
 
Adjustments for special items:       
Foreign exchange loss 
 1
 0.01
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 5
 5
 0.05
 
Start-up costs 9
 9
 0.10
 
Net gain on disposition of assets (13) (13) (0.14) 
Non-operating pension and OPEB credits (4) (4) (0.04) 
Other expense, net 
 4
 0.04
 
Income tax effect of special items 
 (1) (0.01) Income tax effect of special items— (1)(0.01)
Adjusted for special items (1)
$51
 $14
 $0.15
 
Adjusted for special items (1)
$(39)$(53)$(0.59)
Three Months Ended December 31, 2016Operating
Income
(Loss)
Net
Income
(Loss)
EPS  
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
GAAP, as reported$(18) $(45) $(0.50) 
Adjustments for special items:         
Foreign exchange loss 
  10
  0.11
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 25
  25
  0.28
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 2
  2
  0.02
 
Start-up costs 3
  3
  0.03
 
Non-operating pension and OPEB costs 2
  2
  0.02
 
Other income, net 
  (3)  (0.03) 
Income tax effect of special items 
  (1)  (0.01) 
Adjusted for special items (1)
$14
 $(7) $(0.08) 
(1)
(1)Operating income (loss), net income (loss) and EPS, in each case as adjusted for special items, are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include these measures, see note 1 under “Overview – 2017 Overview” above.

Change in the Presentation of Our Non-GAAP Performance Measures
In the first quarter of 2017, we changed our presentation of segment operating income to reallocate the amortization of prior service credits component of pension and OPEB costs from the reportable segments to “corporate and other.” Current service costs will continue to be allocated to the reportable segments. We now also treat the amortization of prior service credits component of pension and OPEB costs as a special item to be adjusted for purposes of establishing our non-GAAP performance measures, as further described above in note 1 under Overview“Overview2017 Overview,” and below in note 1 under “Results2020 Overview” above.
36

Table of OperationsContents
RESULTSOF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results
Selected annual financial information
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts)202020192018
Sales$2,800 $2,923 $3,756 
Operating (loss) income per segment:
Market pulp$(1)$39 $172 
Tissue(1)(16)(30)
Wood products276 (6)169 
Paper(46)82 114 
Segment total228 99 425 
Corporate and other(129)(82)(46)
Operating income$99 $17 $379��
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$10 $(47)$235 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:
Basic$0.12 $(0.51)$2.57 
Diluted$0.12 $(0.51)$2.52 
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
$338 $213 $574 
As of December 31,
(In millions)20202019
Cash and cash equivalents$113 $
Total assets$3,730 $3,626 
(1)Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (or, “EBITDA together with our) and adjusted EBITDA are not financial measures recognized under GAAP. EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest from the Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA, excluding special items, such as closure costs, impairment and other related charges, inventory write-downs related to closures, start-up costs, gains and losses on disposition of assets, non-operating pension and OPEB costs and credits. This approachcredits, and other income and expense, net. We believe that using non-GAAP measures such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA is useful because they are consistent with the indicators management uses internally to evaluatemeasure the Company’s performance includingand it allows the reader to compare our operations and financial performance from period to period. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are internal measures, and therefore may not be comparable to those used by the chief operating decision maker. Prior period amounts have been reclassifiedof other companies. These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as substitutes to conform to the 2017 presentation.

RESULTSOF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results
Selected annual financial informationmeasures determined under GAAP.
37

Table of Contents
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts)201720162015
Sales$3,513
 $3,545
 $3,645
 
Operating income (loss) per segment:         
Market pulp 79
  37
  71
 
Tissue (6)  (10)  (1) 
Wood products 186
  69
  2
 
Newsprint (23)  (16)  (25) 
Specialty papers (9)  19
  23
 
Segment total 227
  99
  70
 
Corporate and other (178)  (125)  (289) 
Operating income (loss) 49
  (26)  (219) 
Net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (84)  (81)  (257) 
Net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:         
Basic$(0.93) $(0.90) $(2.78) 
Diluted (0.93)  (0.90)  (2.78) 
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
$364
 $263
 $260
 
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest$10 $(47)$235 
Interest expense34 31 47 
Income tax provision51 58 152 
Depreciation and amortization169 167 212 
EBITDA264 209 646 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges53 18 121 
Inventory write-downs related to closures25 13 (1)
Start-up costs3 — 
Net gain on disposition of assets(11)(2)(145)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (47)(50)
Other expense (income), net4 22 (5)
Adjusted EBITDA$338 $213 $574 
 As of December 31,
(In millions)20172016
Cash and cash equivalents$6
 $35
 
Total assets 4,147
  4,277
 
(1)
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not financial measures recognized under GAAP. EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests from the Consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA, excluding special items, such as foreign exchange gains and losses, severance costs, closure costs, impairment and other related charges, inventory write-downs related to closures, start-up costs, gains and losses on disposition of assets, non-operating pension and OPEB costs and credits, acquisition-related costs and other charges or credits. We believe that using non-GAAP measures such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA is useful because they are consistent with the indicators management uses internally to measure the Company’s performance and it allows the reader to more easily compare our operations and financial performance from period to period. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are internal measures, and therefore may not be comparable to those of other companies. These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as substitutes to financial measures determined under GAAP.



  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(78) $(76) $(255) 
Interest expense 49
  38
  41
 
Income tax provision (benefit) 84
  19
  (1) 
Depreciation and amortization 204
  206
  237
 
EBITDA$259
 $187
 $22
 
Foreign exchange (gain) loss (9)  7
  4
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 87
  62
  181
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 24
  7
  2
 
Start-up costs 27
  8
  5
 
Net gain on disposition of assets (15)  (2)  
 
Non-operating pension and OPEB (credits) costs (12)  8
  50
 
Acquisition-related costs 
  
  4
 
Other expense (income), net 3
  (14)  (8) 
Adjusted EBITDA$364
 $263
 $260
 
20172020 vs. 20162019
Operating income (loss) variance analysis
rfp-20201231_g3.jpg
Sales
Sales were $32$123 million or 1%, lower in 2017,2020, or 4%, to $3,513$2,800 million. Despite higher shipments in wood products and market pulp, up 9% and 3%, respectively,After removing the sales volumes decreased, reflectingrelated to the capacity rationalization initiatives in newsprint and specialty papers, including the permanent closure of two paper machines in Calhoun at the endacquisition of the third quarter of 2017, the permanent closure of a paper machine in Catawba at the end of the second quarter of 2017, the indefinite idling of our Thorold (Ontario) paper millU.S. Sawmill Business in the first quarter of 2017, the permanent closure2020, sales volume declined by $289 million, mainly reflecting lower shipments in paper and market pulp, partly offset by higher shipments of our Mokpo (South Korea) paper mill in the first quarter of 2017, and the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta (Georgia) mill in the second quarter of 2016. Overall pricingwood products. Pricing had a favorable impact of $194$30 million, including the effectmainly as a result of currency of $3 million, reflecting a 23%an increase in the average transaction price for wood products and tissue, up by 41% and 6%, respectively, partly offset by lower average transaction price for market pulp.pulp and paper, down by 13% and 11%, respectively.

38

Table of Contents
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS improved by $142 million in 2017. Restructuring initiatives reduced COS by $237 million, including the elimination of $79 million in fixed manufacturing costs. After removing the COS related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, given that approximately 65% of our production capacity is based in Canada, the higherlower volume and the effect of the restructuring initiatives, manufacturingweaker Canadian dollar, COS decreased by $84 million in 2020, largely reflecting:
favorable maintenance costs increased by $64 million, reflecting:($55 million), largely associated with timing of outages and reduced spending;
lower energy prices ($12 million);
Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (or “CEWS”) credit ($10 million);
higher contribution from our internal power generation facilities ($7 million); and
lower fiber costs ($6 million);
partially offset by:
increase in write-downs of mill stores and other supplies ($24 million), primarily as a resultinventory associated with the temporary idling of the permanent closure of twoAmos and Baie-Comeau paper machines in Calhoun, a paper machine in Catawba, and our Mokpo paper mill,mills compared to write-downs of mill stores and other supplies recorded in the prior year ($7 million), primarily as a result of the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill;
start-up costs ($22 million) related to the Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility and the restart of a paper machine in Alma (Quebec), compared to start-up costs incurred in the prior year ($6 million) for the continuous pulp digester project and tissue manufacturing and converting facility in Calhoun;
lower contribution from our cogeneration assets that sell power externally ($8 million) and our hydroelectric facilities ($5 million), mostly due to planned maintenance outages;
unfavorable fiber costs ($12 million), mostly due to higher recycled fiber prices and wood costs;
higher natural gas prices ($10 million);
higher maintenance costs ($7 million);
a favorable power cost adjustment in Thunder Bay in 2016 ($6 million);
higher asset preservation costs ($6 million), primarily relatedwrite-downs associated to the indefinite idling of our Thoroldthe Augusta (Georgia) paper mill; and
the recognition of tax credits in connection with infrastructure investments in 2016 ($4 million);
partially offset by:
lower defined benefit pension and OPEB plans costs ($21 million), mostly due to lower interest costs, as a result of the lower discount rates; and
favorable chemical costsmill ($12 million), mainly price-related.
Distribution costs
After removing the unfavorable effect of the Canadian dollar fluctuation and the restructuring initiatives, distribution costs increased by $23 million in 2017, primarily due to higher freight rates, including the effect of the shortage of truck drivers, higher fuel surcharges, and an increase in the average length of haul..
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $2 million lowerhigher in 2017, largely reflecting2020, primarily due to the reduced carrying valueacquisition of our Coosa Pines assets after the impairment charge taken in the second quarter of 2017, the indefinite idling of our Thorold paper mill, and the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill, partlyU.S. Sawmill Business ($7 million), offset by lower depreciation on the amortization of costs associated with the Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility, and the implementation of our integrated business management software.software, which was fully depreciated in the fourth quarter of 2019 ($4 million).
Selling, general &and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative (or, “SG&A increased by $23 million in 2017,”) expenses were unchanged compared to the year-ago period, mainly because ofdue to higher incentive plan expense, which is based on company performance, and higher stock-based compensation expense, including an $8 million increase in share-based compensation as a result of an increase in share priceoffset by lower headcount, travel and the Company’s performance. The latter also caused a $5 million increase in short-term incentive programs. The additional SG&A related to our new tissue facility in Calhoun contributed as well to theentertainment expenses and overall increase.lower expenses.
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges
See the corresponding variance analysis under - Segment Earnings - Corporate“Corporate and OtherOther” below.
Net gain on disposition of assets
See the corresponding variance analysis under - Segment Earnings - Corporate“Corporate and OtherOther” below.

Net lossincome (loss) variance analysis
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits
We recorded non-operating pension and OPEB credits of nil for the full year in 2020, compared to $47 million in the year-ago period. The difference mainly reflects lower interest cost ($32 million) and an OPEB curtailment credit related to the indefinite idling of our Augusta mill ($14 million), partly offset by a settlement loss related to the wind-up of the pension plan of the Thorold paper mill that was indefinitely idled in 2017 and sold in 2020 ($28 million), higher amortization of actuarial losses ($29 million) and lower amortization of prior service credits ($7 million), lower expected return on plan assets ($25 million), and a pension special termination benefit cost related to the indefinite idling of our Augusta mill ($3 million).
Other expense, net
We recorded other expense, net of $4 million in 2020, compared to other expense, net of $22 million in the prior year. The difference mostly reflects a loss on forward commodities contracts of $22 million, offset by a current period favorable insurance claim settlement of $15 million related to our acquisition of Atlas in 2015, compared to the $23 million provision related to the Fibrek Inc. (or, “Fibrek”) litigation recorded in the year-ago period.

Income taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $84$51 million in 2017,2020, on income before income taxes of $6$61 million, compared to an expected income tax provision of $13 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 21%. The difference reflects: U.S. tax on non-U.S. earnings ($23 million); an increase to our valuation allowance related to our U.S. operations
39

Table of Contents
($11 million) where we recognize a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets; foreign tax rate differences ($10 million); and foreign exchange items ($6 million); partly offset by state income taxes ($6 million); and other, net ($6 million) mainly related to the settlement of an insurance claim in connection with our acquisition of Atlas.
We recorded an income tax provision of $58 million in 2019, on income before income taxes of $11 million, compared to an expected income tax provision of $2 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%21%. The difference reflects mostly a $112 millionmainly reflects: an increase to our valuation allowance primarily related to our U.S. operations ($43 million) where we recognize a valuation allowance against virtually all of our net deferred income tax assets, and a $12 million decrease to our deferred income tax assets due to the enactment of a lower foreign income tax rate, offset in part by state and foreign tax rate differences ($33 million), and foreign exchange items ($6 million).
We recorded an income tax provision of $19 million in 2016, on a loss before income taxes of $57 million, compared to an expected income tax benefit of $20 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%. The difference reflects a $99 million valuation allowance primarily related to our U.S. operations where we recognized a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets, and foreign exchange items, partially offset by a $55 million adjustment primarily related to the release of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of the statute of limitations of the applicable jurisdictions, andassets; foreign tax rate differences ($11 million).
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts; and Jobs Act (or “TCJA”) was enacted into law which, among other changes, reduced the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, and implemented a new system of taxation foron non-U.S. earnings including the imposition of a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries. Based on available information, we have provisionally estimated the impacts of the TCJA on our 2017 financial results, with the exception of the effects of the newly enacted global intangible low-taxed($7 million); partly offset by state income (or “GILTI”) regime as a reasonable estimate cannot be determined. The enactment of the TCJA did not have a significant impact on our results of operations in 2017. The final impact of the TCJA may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, the issuance of additional legislative guidance and clarification, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA. During the 12-month measurement period following the enactment of the TCJA, we will recognize any adjustments to our provisional amounts in the reporting period the adjustments are determined. Accordingly, we continue to evaluate its effects on our 2018 financial results. For more information, see Note 15, “Income Taxes,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.taxes ($7 million).
Q4 of 20172020 vs. Q4 of 20162019
Operating income (loss) variance analysis
rfp-20201231_g4.jpg
Sales
Our sales were 1% higher inSales increased by $101 million, or 15%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2017 at $8982019, to $769 million. Including restructuring initiatives,After removing the sales related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business in the first quarter of 2020, sales volume had an unfavorable impactwas $40 million lower, mainly due to lower shipments of $81 million, reflecting an 83,000 metric ton decrease in newsprint shipments and a 58,000 short ton (53,000 metric ton) decrease in specialty papers shipments, following the permanent closure of two paper, machines in Calhoun and one paper machine in Catawba, the indefinite idling of our Thorold paper mill, and the permanent closure of our Mokpo paper mill. Shipments in wood products also decreased, down by 7%, partlypartially offset by higher shipmentsvolumes of market pulp, up by 5%. Aswood products. Pricing had a favorable impact of $101 million, mainly as a result of favorable market dynamics, pricing improved sales by $90 million, including the positive effect of currency

of $2 million, reflecting a 34%an increase in the average transaction price for wood products, 15%up by 67%, partly offset by lower average transaction price for market pulp, and 3% for newsprint.paper, down by 7%.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $52 million lower in the quarter. Restructuring initiatives reduced COS by $88 million, including the elimination of $37 million in fixed manufacturing costs. After removing the COS related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, the higherlower volume and the effect of the restructuring initiatives, manufacturing costsweaker Canadian dollar, COS increased by $15 million, reflecting:
a favorable power cost adjustment in Thunder Bay in 2016 ($6 million);
higher maintenance and labor costs ($6 million);
higher start-up costs ($6 million) related to the Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility, as well as the restart of a paper machine in Alma; and
lower contribution from our cogeneration facility in Thunder Bay, mostly due to a planned maintenance outage ($2 million);
partly offset by lower defined benefit pension and OPEB plans costs ($8 million), mostly due to lower interest costs, as a result of the lower discount rates.
Distribution costs
After removing the unfavorable effect of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, higher volume, and the restructuring initiatives, distribution costs increased by $9 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to higher freight rates, including the effect of the shortage of truck drivers, and an increase in the average length of haul.
Selling, general & administrative expenses
SG&A increased by $15$1 million in the quarter, becausemainly reflecting higher stumpage costs related to current wood prices ($9 million) partly offset by favorable maintenance costs ($6 million), largely associated with timing of outages and reduced spending.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A expenses increased by $2 million in the quarter, mainly due to higher incentive plan expense, which is based on company performance, and higher stock-based compensation expense, including an $8 million increase in share-based compensation as a result of the Company’s performancemostly offset by lower headcount and increase in share price, the stronger Canadian dollar, and a lower group insurance refund.overall expenses.
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges
In the fourth quarter of 2017,2020, we recorded closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $5$55 million, related to the temporary idling of our Amos and Baie-Comeau paper mills, including accelerated depreciation charges of $38 million and severance and other costs of $17 million. This compares to closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $18 million in the year-ago period, mainly due to the indefinite idling of our paper mill at Augusta, including severance and other costs of $10 million and accelerated depreciation charges of $8 million.
40

Table of Contents
Net loss variance analysis
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit (costs) credits
We recorded non-operating pension and OPEB costs of $24 million in the quarter, compared to $25a credit of $11 million in the year-ago period. The difference reflects mainly reflects: lower interest cost ($8 million); partly offset by settlement loss related to the wind-up of the Thorold pension plan ($28 million), higher amortization of actuarial losses ($7 million) and lower expected return on plan assets ($6 million).
Other expense, net
We recorded other expense, net of $28 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, long-lived asset impairment charges2020, compared to nil in the year-ago period. The difference mostly reflects a loss on forward commodities contracts of $22$15 million for our recycled newsprint assets, asand a result of declining market conditions and higher recycled material prices.
Net gain on disposition of assets
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded a net gain on disposition of assetsforeign exchange loss of $13 million compared to none in the year-ago period, reflecting the sale of the assets of our permanently closed Mokpo paper mill for a cash consideration of $18 million, resulting in a gain on disposition of assets of $13 million.
Net income (loss) variance analysiscurrent period.
Income taxes
We recorded an income tax provisionbenefit of $21$4 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, on income before income taxes of $36 million, compared to an expected income tax provision of $13 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%. The difference reflects an $18 million valuation allowance primarily related to our U.S. operations where we recognize a valuation allowance against virtually all of our net deferred income tax assets, and foreign exchange items ($3 million), offset in part by state and foreign tax rate differences ($11 million).
In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recorded a $10 million income tax provision,2020, on a loss before income taxes of $34$56 million, compared to an expected income tax benefit of $12 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%21%. The difference reflects mostly a $34 milliondecrease to our valuation allowance primarily related to our U.S. operations where we recognized a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets, and foreign exchange items ($710 million), partially; partly offset by an $18 million adjustment primarily related to the release of previously unrecognizedU.S. tax benefits due to the lapse of the statute of limitations of the applicable jurisdictions.on non-U.S. earnings ($22 million).

2016 vs. 2015
Operating loss variance analysis
On November 16, 2015, we acquired Atlas Tissue, a manufacturer of a range of tissue products for the away-from-home and at-home markets, including virgin and recycled products, covering economy, value and premium grades and operating two tissue mills and a recycling facility in Florida. We began consolidating the results of operations of Atlas Tissue in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of November 16, 2015.
Sales
Excluding an increase of $78 million due to Atlas Tissue, sales were $178 million, or 5%, lower in 2016, to $3,545 million. Sales volume decreased by $68 million because of lower shipments in newsprint and specialty papers, down by 7% and 4%, respectively, only partially offset by higher shipments in wood products and market pulp, up by 10% and 1%, respectively. Pricing had an unfavorable impact of $110 million, including the effect of currency of $6 million, reflecting a 7% drop in the average transaction price for market pulp, 4% for specialty papers, and 2% for newsprint, only partially offset by an increase of 1% for wood products.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS improved by $110 million in 2016. After removing the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, the lower volume, and the COS related to Atlas Tissue, manufacturing costs improved by $58 million, reflecting:
lower defined benefit pension and OPEB plans costs ($45 million), mostly due to lower amortization of actuarial losses, as a result of the lower balance sheet net pension and OPEB liability as of December 31, 2015, and a $14 million settlement charge related to annuity purchases for certain inactive U.S. employees recorded in 2015;
lower fiber costs ($21 million), including lower wood prices and favorable usage;
better power costs ($18 million), mostly price-related, including a benefit from the reduced power rates on Quebec’s north shore to compensate for the higher cost related to processing spruce budworm infested wood;
lower steam costs ($13 million), mainly due to lower natural gas prices;
higher contribution from our cogeneration assets that sell power externally and our hydroelectric facilities ($7 million); and
lower wood chip prices ($4 million);

partially offset by:
higher maintenance costs ($20 million);
favorable property tax adjustments and the recognition of tax credits in connection with infrastructure investments, in 2015 ($15 million);
higher labor costs ($7 million);
unfavorable chemical costs ($6 million); and
more write-downs of mill stores and other supplies ($5 million), primarily as a result of the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill.
Distribution costs
After removing the favorable effect of the Canadian dollar fluctuation ($4 million), and the lower volume, distribution costs were $9 million lower in 2016, primarily due to lower fuel surcharges, and the expiration of the 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement (or the “SLA”) in October 2015, under which our Canadian softwood lumber exports to the U.S. had been subject to export duties ($4 million), offset in part by an increase in cross-border sales and higher freight rates.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $31 million lower in 2016, largely reflecting the reduced carrying value of our Catawba paper assets after the $176 million impairment charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2015, the net increase of the useful lives of certain of our machinery and equipment, and the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill, offset in part by depreciation and amortization related to Atlas Tissue, our new and refurbished sawmills in Ontario and the implementation of our integrated business management software.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A decreased by $11 million in 2016, primarily because of lower compensation expense, the weaker Canadian dollar, and reduced bad debt expense, franchise tax and professional fees, partially offset by the SG&A related to Atlas Tissue.
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges
See the corresponding variance analysis under “- Segment Earnings - Corporate and Other” below.
Net loss variance analysis
Other income, net
We recorded other income, net, of $7 million in 2016, compared to other income, net, of $4 million in 2015. This includes, in 2016, a $5 million gain on the disposition of our 50% interest in Produits Forestiers Petit-Paris Inc.
Income taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $19$6 million in 2016,the fourth quarter of 2019, on a loss before income taxes of $57 million. See the 2017 vs. 2016 variance analysis above.
We recorded an income tax benefit of $1 million in 2015, on a loss before income taxes of $256$65 million, compared to an expected income tax benefit of $90$14 million based on the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%21%. The difference reflects the unfavorable effects of a $109 millionmostly: an increase to our valuation allowance primarily related to our U.S. operations where we recognized a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets, and foreign exchange items,($25 million); partly offset by U.S. tax on non-U.S. earnings ($4 million).
2019 vs. 2018
For a change in tax ratesvariance analysis of our 2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our annual report on deferred income taxes due to an intercompany asset transfer in connectionForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with an operating company realignment, and state and foreign tax rate differences.

the SEC on March 2, 2020 (or, the “2019 Annual Report”).
Segment Earnings
We manage our business based on the products we manufacture. Our reportable segments correspond to our principal product lines: market pulp, tissue, wood products, and paper. As of the second quarter of 2020, the results from our newsprint and specialty papers.papers operations have been combined to form the paper reportable segment. This better reflects management’s internal analysis, given the diminishing percentage newsprint and specialty papers represent in our product portfolio. Comparative information has been modified to conform to this revised segment presentation.

We do not allocate any of the income or loss items following “operating income (loss)”income” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations to our segments because those items are reviewed separately by management. Similarly, we do not allocate to the segments: closure costs, impairment and other related charges; inventory write-downs related to closures; start-up costs; gains and losses on disposition of assets; non-operating pension and OPEB costs and credits; acquisition-related costs; as well as other discretionary charges or credits.
We allocate depreciation and amortization expense to our segments, although the related fixed assets and amortizable intangible assets are not allocated to segment assets. Additionally, all SG&A isexpenses are allocated to our segments, with the exception of certain discretionary charges and credits, which we present under “corporate and other.”

41

Table of Contents
MARKET PULP
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)202020192018
Sales$668 $797 $1,085 
Operating (loss) income (1)
$(1)$39 $172 
EBITDA (2)
$23 $62 $199 
(In thousands of metric tons)   
Shipments1,118 1,156 1,424 
Downtime100 56 93 
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)2017  2016  2015  
Sales$911
 $836
 $889
 
Operating income (1)
 79
  37
  71
 
EBITDA (2)
 110
  74
  124
 
(In thousands of metric tons)         
Shipments 1,425
  1,388
  1,375
 
Downtime 84
  65
  112
 
  
December 31,
(In thousands of metric tons)202020192018
Finished goods inventory53 68 80 
(1)Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interest is equal to operating (loss) income in this segment.
  
December 31,
(In thousands of metric tons)2017  2016  2015  
Finished goods inventory 89
  91
  90
 
(1)
Net income including noncontrolling interests is equal to operating income in this segment.
(2)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” above.
(2)EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected annual financial information” above.
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  (In millions)202020192018
Net income including noncontrolling interests$79
 $37
 $71
 
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interestNet (loss) income including noncontrolling interest$(1)$39 $172 
Depreciation and amortization 31
 37
 53
 Depreciation and amortization24 23 27 
EBITDA 110
 74
 124
 EBITDA$23 $62 $199 
Industry trends
rfp-20201231_g5.jpg
World demand for chemical pulp grew by 3.7%3% in 2017, including increases2020 compared to the year-ago period, reflecting an increase of 7.6% and 2.7%7.7% in China and of 6.5% in North America, respectively, whilepartly offset by a decrease of 6.5% in Western Europe was largely unchanged.Europe. World capacity grew by 3.2%0.8% over the same period.

42

Table of Contents
World demand for softwood pulp was upfell by 2.5%1.7% in 2017. This reflects increases2020, reflecting a decrease of 7.3% and 2.1% in shipments of 4.4%, 1.6%Western Europe and 0.6% toChina, respectively, while North America China and Western Europe, respectively. increased by 4.5%. The operating rate was 91%.
In the same period, demand for hardwood pulp was uprose by 4.9%6.0%, with shipments to China and North America up by 12.9%13.0% and 9.6%, respectively, while Western Europe was down by 0.6%, and North America remained unchanged.6.5%. The operating rate was 94%.
20172020 vs. 20162019
Operating (loss) income variance analysis
rfp-20201231_g6.jpg
Sales
Sales were $75$129 million higher,lower, or 9%16%, decreasing to $911$668 million in 2017. The2020, primarily due to lower pricing, reflecting a $92 per metric ton decline in the average transaction price rose by $37 per metric ton, mainly as a result of higher market prices across all grades. Shipments wereVolume also 37,000 metric tons higher,decreased sales by $26 million primarily due to improved productivity, and incremental production following the closure of two paper machines in Calhoun, partly offset by lower shipments of RBK, given unfavorablepandemic-induced market conditions.
We recorded 19,000 more metric tons of downtime in 2017 compared to the prior year, mainly as a result of additional production slowback at our RBK mills.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS increased by $30 million in 2017. After removing the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation and the higher volume, manufacturing costs increased by $14 million, reflecting:
higher maintenance and labor costs ($6 million);
higher fiber costs ($5 million), mostly due to higherfor recycled fiber prices, offset in part by better usage;
higher natural gas prices ($4 million); and
lower contribution from our cogeneration assets in Saint-Félicien that sell power externally ($4 million);
partly offset by favorable chemical costs ($4 million).
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $6 million lower in 2017, largely reflecting the reduced carrying value of our Coosa Pines assets after the impairment charge taken in the second quarter of 2017.

2016 vs. 2015
Operating income variance analysis
Sales
Sales were $53 million lower, or 6%, to $836 million in 2016. The average transaction price dropped by $44 per metric ton as a result of lower market prices across all grades, but mostly for hardwood and softwood pulp due to anticipated supply additions. Shipments, however, were 13,000 metric tons higher, as a result of improved operating performance and increased capacity from the continuous digester in Calhoun.
We recorded 65,000 metric tons of downtime in 2016, compared to 112,000 metric tons in the prior year. 2015 included more downtime related to production slowback at our RBK mills.bleached kraft pulp.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After adjusting for the effectseffect of lower volume and the Canadian dollar fluctuation, and higher volume, manufacturing costs increaseddecreased by $10$59 million, reflecting:
higherfavorable maintenance and labor costs ($1726 million);, largely associated with timing of outages and reduced spending;
offset by:
lower wood fiber costs ($4 million);
lower wood chip prices ($316 million); and
lower steamenergy prices ($8 million), including higher contribution from our internal power generation facilities.
Distribution costs ($3 million),
After adjusting for the effect of lower volume, distribution costs were $8 million lower in 2020 due to lower natural gas prices.freight rates and favorable destination mix.
Depreciation and amortization2019 vs. 2018
The lower depreciation and amortization is due to the increase of the useful lives of certainFor a variance analysis of our machinery2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and equipment.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Segment Earnings – Market Pulp – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our 2019 Annual Report.

43

Table of Contents
TISSUE
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)202020192018
Sales$173 $165 $130 
Operating loss (1)
$(1)$(16)$(30)
EBITDA (2)
$17 $$(15)
(In thousands of short tons)   
Shipments (3)
95 97 84 
Downtime8 
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)2017  2016  2015  
Sales$81
 $89
 $11
 
Operating loss (1)
 (6)  (10)  (1) 
EBITDA (2)
 (1)  (5)  
 
(In thousands of short tons)         
Shipments (3) (4)
 53
  54
  7
 
Downtime 1
  
  
 
  
December 31,
(In thousands of short tons)202020192018
Finished goods inventory (3)
6 
(1)Net loss including noncontrolling interest is equal to operating loss in this segment.
  
December 31,
(In thousands of short tons)2017  2016  2015  
Finished goods inventory (3)
 13
  5
  6
 
(1)
Net loss including noncontrolling interests is equal to operating loss in this segment.
(2)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” above.
(3)
Tissue converted products, which are measured in cases, are converted to short tons.
(4)
The conversion ratio to short tons for tissue converted products was revised in 2017. Prior period figures have been adjusted for comparative purposes.
(2)EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected annual financial information” above.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(6) $(10) $(1) 
Depreciation and amortization 5
  5
  1
 
EBITDA (1)  (5)  
 
(3)Tissue converted products, which are measured in cases, are converted to short tons.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net loss including noncontrolling interest$(1)$(16)$(30)
Depreciation and amortization18 18 15 
EBITDA$17 $$(15)
Industry trends

rfp-20201231_g7.jpg
Total U.S. tissue consumption in the U.S. grew by 1.8%8.6% in 2017. U.S. converted tissue products2020 compared to the year-ago period. Converted product shipments were upincreased by 1.9%8.1%, led by away-from homeat-home shipments which grewup by 2.9%16.3%, while at-homeaway-from-home shipments increaseddecreased by 1.4%8.5%.
U.S. parent roll production showed a growth of 1.9% from 2016. Tissue capacity also increased by 1.8%,7.0% in 2020, contributing to a 93%97% average industry operating rate, largely unchangedproduction-to-capacity ratio, up from 2016.93% in the year-ago period.
2017
44

Table of Contents
2020 vs. 20162019
Operating loss variance analysis
The operating loss variance analysis for the tissue segment includes only the results of Atlas Tissue. The operating loss, excluding depreciation and amortization, of $25 million incurred in 2017, for our Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility, was recorded as start-up costs under “corporate and other.”rfp-20201231_g8.jpg
Sales
Sales were $8 million lower,higher, or 9%5%, increasing to $81$173 million in 2017.2020. Shipments were essentially unchanged as productivity gains for retail products manufactured at the Calhoun operations compensated for a pandemic-driven drop in away-from-home demand affecting Florida operations. The average transaction price dropped by $114was $107 per short ton or 7%, as a result of unfavorable product mix. The decrease in shipments is mainly attributable to converted products, in part due to the discontinuance of unprofitable away-from-home business, mostly offset by an increase in parent roll shipments.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After removing the effect of the lower volume, our manufacturing costs improved by $6 million in 2017, despite facility damage and business interruption costs associated with Hurricane Irma. The cost improvement is primarily attributable to lower maintenance and related labor costs, improved material usage, as well as integration costs recorded in the year-ago period.
Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility
In 2017, we started our new tissue machine in Calhoun, producing our first tissue parent roll on February 28, 2017. We expect the tissue machine to attain its targeted operational capacity in mid-2018. Converted tissue products sold from Calhoun are manufactured entirely from parent rolls produced on-site. During 2017, a significant quality milestone was also achieved, as bath tissue that is of equivalent quality to a through air drying product is now being produced at our tissue facility. The total project cost remains, as previously disclosed, at $295 million.


WOOD PRODUCTS
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)2017  2016  2015  
Sales$797
 $596
 $536
 
Operating income (1)
 186
  69
  2
 
EBITDA (2)
 219
  100
  39
 
(In million board feet)         
Shipments (3)
 2,011
  1,844
  1,678
 
Downtime (3)
 130
  199
  176
 
  
December 31,
(In million board feet)2017  2016  2015  
Finished goods inventory (3)
 124
  124
  130
 
(1)
Net income including noncontrolling interests is equal to operating income in this segment.
(2)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” above.
(3)
Includes wood pellets measured by mass, converted to board feet using a density-based conversion ratio.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net income including noncontrolling interests$186
 $69
 $2
 
Depreciation and amortization 33
  31
  37
 
EBITDA 219
  100
  39
 
Industry trends
2017 U.S. housing starts were 1.2 million, up by 2.4% compared to 2016. Single-family starts, which consume larger lumber volumes per start, rose by 8.5%.

2017 vs. 2016
Operating income variance analysis
Sales
Sales were $201 million higher, or 34%, to $797 million in 2017. Shipments were higher by 167 million board feet, reflecting improved productivity for certain sawmills, incremental capacity from our new sawmill in Senneterre – Lac-Clair (Quebec), which has been consolidated with our Senneterre sawmill, as well as a 69 million board feet reduction in downtime compared to 2016, which included downtime taken due to unfavorable pricing for eight-foot stud grades. The average transaction price increased by $73 per thousand board feet, or 23%, largely due to supply constraints from a very active 2017 forest fire season in British Columbia and marginally improving demand in the U.S. housing market.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After adjusting for the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation and higher volume, manufacturing costs increased by $28 million, reflecting higher fiber costs ($12 million), including higher stumpage fees in the province of Quebec and higher transportation costs, and higher maintenance, log yard and other related costs ($8 million).
Distribution costs
After removing the effects of higher volume and the Canadian dollar fluctuation, distribution costs increased by $6 million, primarily as a result of higher freight rates.

2016 vs. 2015
Operating income variance analysis
Sales
Sales were $60 million higher, or 11%, to $596 million in 2016. Shipments were higher by 166 million board feet, reflecting sales from our new sawmills and improved productivity for certain sawmills in Quebec, partially offset by additional downtime of 23 million board feet compared to the prior year, mostly as a result of market conditions, in particular unfavorable pricing for eight-foot stud grades. The average transaction price increased by $3 per thousand board feet as the demand in lumber markets continued to recover.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After adjusting for the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation and higher volume, manufacturing costs increased by $6 million, reflecting:
the recognition of tax credits in 2015, in connection with infrastructure investments ($7 million);
higher labor and maintenance costs ($5 million); and
lower wood chip selling prices ($4 million);
offset by lower fiber costs ($10 million), including lower prices and favorable usage.
Distribution costs
After removing the effects of higher volume and the Canadian dollar fluctuation, distribution costs improved by $3 million, primarily as a result of the expiration of the SLA in October 2015, under which our Canadian softwood lumber exports to the U.S. had been subject to export duties.
Depreciation and amortization
The lower depreciation and amortization is due to the increase of the useful lives of certain of our machinery and equipment, offset in part by depreciation and amortization related to our new and refurbished sawmills in Ontario.


NEWSPRINT
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)2017  2016  2015  
Sales$842
 $1,009
 $1,105
 
Operating loss (1)
 (23)  (16)  (25) 
EBITDA (2)
 43
  58
  39
 
(In thousands of metric tons)         
Shipments 1,638
  1,992
  2,150
 
Downtime 55
  81
  78
 
  
December 31,
(In thousands of metric tons)2017  2016  2015  
Finished goods inventory 78
  105
  91
 
(1)
Net loss including noncontrolling interests is equal to operating loss in this segment.
(2)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” above.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(23) $(16) $(25) 
Depreciation and amortization 66
  74
  64
 
EBITDA 43
  58
  39
 
Industry trends
North American demand for newsprint fell by 11.3% in 2017, driven by a 17.0% reduction in demand from newspaper publishers, while demand from commercial printers was up by 2.3%. However, industry production was also significantly lower, down by 12.0%. Accordingly, the North American operating rate increased to 94% in 2017, from 92% in 2016.

Global demand for newsprint was down by 7.9% in 2017, with Western Europe, Asia and Latin America down by 6.9%, 6.8% and 4.7%, respectively. Exports from North America declined in line with global demand, down by 111,000 metric tons, or 8.0%, compared to 2016.
2017 vs. 2016
Operating loss variance analysis
Sales
Newsprint sales dropped by $167 million, or 17%, to $842 million in 2017, reflecting a 354,000 metric ton decrease in shipments, due to the lower production volumes following the paper machine closures in Calhoun at the end of the third quarter of 2017, the indefinite idling of our Thorold paper mill in the first quarter of 2017, the permanent closure of our Mokpo paper mill in the first quarter of 2017, and the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill in the second quarter of 2016. In 2017, global capacity reductions exceeded declines in demand, resulting in favorable short-term market conditions for newsprint, particularly in the latter part of the year. The average transaction price increased by $8 per metric ton, as price increases were realized in North America, and our finished goods inventory fell by 27,000 metric tons.
Compared to 2016, our international shipments fell by 21%, and our domestic shipments by 15%. Accordingly, our domestic shipments represented 62% of total newsprint shipments in 2017, up by 1% from 2016.
We recorded 55,000 metric tons of downtime in 2017, compared to 81,000 metric tons in the prior year, which included downtime related to our Thorold paper mill, which has since been indefinitely idled.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $141 million lower in 2017. Restructuring initiatives reduced COS by $172 million, including the elimination of $47 million in fixed manufacturing costs. After removing the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, the higher volume, and the effect of the restructuring initiatives, manufacturing costs increased by $21 million, reflecting:
higher power costs ($10 million), mostly due to a favorable adjustment in Thunder Bay in 2016, and unfavorable usage;
lower contribution from our cogeneration facilities ($6 million), mostly the result of a more extensive planned maintenance outage in 2017 at Thunder Bay; and
unfavorable steam costs ($3 million), mainly due to higher natural gas prices.

Distribution costs
After removing the effect of restructuring initiatives, distribution costs increased by $7 million, primarily as a result of higher freight rates, higher fuel surcharges, and an increase in the average length of haul.
Depreciation and amortization
The lower depreciation and amortization is due to the indefinite idling of our Thorold paper mill and the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The higher overall SG&A was mostly offset by lower allocated expenses as a result of capacity reductions.
2016 vs. 2015
Operating loss variance analysis
Sales
Newsprint sales dropped by $96 million, or 9%, to $1,009 million in 2016, reflecting a 158,000 metric ton decrease in shipments and an $8 per metric ton drop in average transaction price, including the unfavorable effect of the weaker Canadian dollar on sales denominated in that currency. The decrease in shipments is in line with the lower production volumes following the permanent shutdown of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill. The decrease in average transaction price was mainly due to the weakening global currencies, which led to a $38 per metric ton drop in marketfavorable prices for exports.
Compared to 2015, our domestic and international shipments both fell by 7%. Domestic shipments represented 61% of total newsprint shipments in 2016.

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $92 million lower in 2016, reflecting the effects of lower volume, the Canadian dollar fluctuation and a $27 million improvement in manufacturing costs, primarily due to:
lower power costs ($16 million), including a benefit from the reduced power rates on Quebec’s north shore to compensate for the higher cost related to processing spruce budworm infested wood;
lower steam costs ($5 million), mainly due to lower natural gas prices;
higher contribution from our cogeneration assets in Thunder Bay that sell power externally ($3 million);
lower wood chip prices ($2 million); and
favorable chemical costs ($2 million);
partially offset by higher maintenance costs ($4 million).
Depreciation and amortization
The higher depreciation and amortization is due to the decrease of the useful lives of certain of our machinery and equipment, offset in part by the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill and the full amortization of certain assets in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A was $6 million lower in 2016, primarily due to lower allocated expenses as a result of capacity reductions.

SPECIALTY PAPERS
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)2017  2016  2015  
Sales$882
 $1,015
 $1,104
 
Operating (loss) income (1)
 (9)  19
  23
 
EBITDA (2)
 36
  64
  94
 
(In thousands of short tons)         
Shipments 1,343
  1,514
  1,580
 
Downtime 33
  22
  66
 
  
December 31,
(In thousands of short tons)2017  2016  2015  
Finished goods inventory 66
  92
  88
 
(1)
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests is equal to operating (loss) income in this segment.
(2)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Information” above.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests$(9) $19
 $23
 
Depreciation and amortization 45
  45
  71
 
EBITDA 36
  64
  94
 
Industry trends
Demand for uncoated mechanical papers in 2017 was down by 8.8% in North America. SC and standard papers were down by 11.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Industry production was down by 10.5%, keeping operating rates at around 91%. The lower industry production included the closure of two paper machines at Calhoun, partly offset by the restart of a paper machine at Alma.

North American coated mechanical paper demand was down by 9.5% in 2017. Production was also down significantly, by 316,000 short tons (287,000 metric tons), which represents a reduction of 11.9%. North American coated mechanical paper imports were down by 15,000 short tons (14,000 metric tons) in 2017, which represents a decrease of 3.7%. With the North American capacity closures, including the closure of a paper machine at Catawba, operating rates in North America reached 95% in 2017.
2017 vs. 2016
Operating (loss) income variance analysis
Sales
Specialty paper sales decreased by $133 million, or 13%, to $882 million in 2017. The average transaction price dropped by $14 per short ton, despite some pricing gains realized in the latter part of 2017. Shipments were 171,000 short tons (155,000 metric tons) lower, or 11%, mainly in white and coated paper grades, largely due to declining market conditions, which led to the permanent closure of two paper machines in Calhoun at the end of the third quarter of 2017, and one paper machine in Catawba at the end of the second quarter of 2017, partly offset by an increase due to the restart of a paper machine in Alma. Finished goods fell by 26,000 short tons (24,000 metric tons).

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $102 million lower in 2017. Restructuring initiatives reduced COS by $65 million, including the elimination of $32 million in fixed manufacturing costs. After removing the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation, the lower volume, and the effect of the restructuring initiatives, manufacturing costs improved by $9 million, reflecting:
favorable chemical costs ($9 million), mainly price-related;
lower power costs ($5 million), mostly price-related; and
higher contribution from our cogeneration assets in Dolbeau that sell power externally ($2 million);
offset in part by:
unfavorable steam costs ($6 million), mostly due to higher natural gas prices; and
lower internal hydroelectric generation ($5 million), due to a planned maintenance outage.
Distribution costs
After removing the effects of the lower volume, the restructuring initiatives, and the Canadian dollar fluctuation, distribution costs increased by $8 million, primarily as a result of an increase in the average length of haul, and higher freight rates, including the effect of the shortage of truck drivers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The higher overall SG&A was mostly offset by lower allocated expenses as a result of capacity reductions.
2016 vs. 2015
Operating income variance analysis
Sales
Specialty paper sales decreased by $89 million, or 8%, to $1,015 million in 2016. The average transaction price dropped by $28 per short ton as a result of lower market prices across all grades, but mostly for coated mechanical and SC grades. Shipments were 66,000 short tons (60,000 metric tons) lower, or 4%.

We recorded 22,000 short tons (20,000 metric tons) of downtime in 2016, compared to 66,000 short tons (60,000 metric tons) in the prior year. That year included downtime related to a paper machine at our Alma mill.converted products.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After removing the effects of the Canadian dollar fluctuation and lower volume, our manufacturing costs improveddecreased by $5$3 million reflecting:
lower fiber costs ($6 million);
higher contribution from our cogeneration assets in Dolbeau that sell power externally, and our hydroelectric facilities ($6 million);
favorable steam costs ($5 million),compared to 2019, mainly due to lower natural gas pricesfiber costs.
Distribution costs
Distribution costs improved by $3 million, mainly as a result of better customer mix.
2019 vs. 2018
For a variance analysis of our 2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and favorable usage;Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Segment Earnings – Tissue – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our 2019 Annual Report.
lower
45

Table of Contents
WOOD PRODUCTS
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)202020192018
Sales$1,025 $616 $823 
Operating income (loss) (1)
$276 $(6)$169 
EBITDA (2)
$319 $28 $201 
(In million board feet)   
Shipments (3)
2,043 1,731 1,846 
Downtime279 242 147 
  
December 31,
(In million board feet)202020192018
Finished goods inventory (3)
97 133 157 
(1)Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest is equal to operating income (loss) in this segment.
(2)EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected annual financial information” above.
(3)Includes wood chip prices ($3 million);pellets measured by mass, converted to board feet using a density-based conversion ratio.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest$276 $(6)$169 
Depreciation and amortization43 34 32 
EBITDA$319 $28 $201 
Industry trends
rfp-20201231_g9.jpg
U.S. housing starts were 1.4 million on a seasonally adjusted basis in 2020, up by 7.9% compared to 2019, which reflects a 12.3% increase in single-family starts, offset by a decrease of 1.9% in part by:multi-family starts.
The 2x4 – Random Length (or, “RL”) #1-2 Kiln Dried Great Lakes (or, “KD GL”) price rose by 44.3% in 2020 compared to the year ago period, and the 2x4x8 Stud KD GL price rose by 70.4%. The 2x4 – RL #2 KD Southern Pine (Eastside) price increased by 46.3%, and the 2x4 – RL #2 KD Southern Pine (Westside) price was up by 48.2%.
46

Table of Contents
2020 vs. 2019
Operating income (loss) variance analysis
rfp-20201231_g10.jpg
Sales
Sales were $409 million higher, or 66%, to $1,025 million in 2020, reflecting new volume related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, the increase in market demand for home repairs and remodeling, and stronger U.S. market housing starts. Shipments rose by 312 million board feet and the average transaction price increased by $146 per thousand board feet, or 41%. After removing the sales related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, sales were $272 million higher. Pricing contributed to $239 million increase, reflecting a rise in average transaction price, and sales volume was $33 million higher. Finished goods inventory dropped to 97 million board feet.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
After removing the COS related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, the effects of higher volume and the weaker Canadian dollar, manufacturing costs increased by $11 million, mainly reflecting higher log costs.
Distribution costs
After removing the COS related to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business and the effects of higher volume, distribution costs increased by $8 million, mainly as a result of higher freight rates and unfavorable chemical costs ($10 million); and
higher maintenance costs ($2 million).destination mix.
Depreciation and amortization
The lower depreciationDepreciation and amortization reflectsincreased by $9 million compared to the reduced carrying valueyear-ago period, primarily due to the acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business.
2019 vs. 2018
For a variance analysis of our Catawba paper assets after2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Segment Earnings – Wood Products – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our 2019 Annual Report.
47

Table of Contents
PAPER
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except where otherwise stated)202020192018
Sales$934 $1,345 $1,718 
Operating (loss) income (1)
$(46)$82 $114 
EBITDA (2)
$23 $154 $227 
(In thousands of metric tons)   
Shipments1,577 2,017 2,532 
Downtime514 203 42 
  
December 31,
(In thousands of metric tons)202020192018
Finished goods inventory96 142 150 
(1)Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interest is equal to operating (loss) income in this segment.
(2)EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled below. For more information on the $176 million impairment charge takencalculation and reasons we include this measure, see note 1 under “Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected annual financial information” above.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interest$(46)$82 $114 
Depreciation and amortization69 72 113 
EBITDA$23 $154 $227 
Industry trends
rfp-20201231_g11.jpg
North American newsprint demand fell by 26.2% in 2020, compared to 2019. Demand from newspaper publishers fell by 29.4%, while demand from commercial printers also decreased, by 21.4%. The North American shipment-to-capacity ratio was 75%, compared to 83% in the fourthyear-ago-period.
48

Table of Contents
Global demand for newsprint fell by 22.6% in 2020, with Asia down by 20.3%, and Western Europe down by 21.5%. Accordingly, the global operating rate decreased to 72%, down from 84% in 2019.
rfp-20201231_g12.jpg
North American demand for uncoated mechanical papers was down by 23.2% in 2020 compared to the year-ago-period, reflecting a 29.0% decrease in supercalendered (or, “SC”) grades, and a 17.3% drop in standard grades. Compared to 2019, the shipment-to-capacity ratio for all uncoated mechanical papers decreased from 83% to 73%.

49

Table of Contents
2020 vs. 2019
Operating (loss) income variance analysis
rfp-20201231_g13.jpg
Sales
Sales fell by $411 million, or 31%, to $934 million in 2020. Shipments decreased by 440,000 metric tons, largely reflecting much lower demand levels since the onset of the pandemic and our resulting capacity adjustments particularly for marketing-dependent products and commercial paper. The average transaction price dropped by $75 per metric ton compared to 2019 due to weaker market fundamentals accelerated by the pandemic.
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
Manufacturing costs decreased by $41 million after adjusting for the effects of lower volume and the weaker Canadian dollar, reflecting:
favorable maintenance costs ($28 million), due to reduced spending as well as the indefinite idling of our Augusta mill, partly offset by the temporary idling of the Amos and Baie-Comeau paper mills;
lower energy prices ($6 million); and
higher contribution from our internal power generation facilities ($5 million).
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A expenses decreased by $12 million in the year, mainly due to lower headcount and travel and entertainment expenses.
2019 vs. 2018
As of the second quarter of 2015,2020, the results from our newsprint and specialty papers operations have been combined to form the increase of the useful lives of certainpaper reportable segment. For a variance analysis of our machinery2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and equipment.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Segment Earnings – Newsprint – 2019 vs. 2018,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Segment Earnings– Specialty Papers – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our 2019 Annual Report.

CORPORATE
50

Table of Contents
CORPORATEAND OTHER OTHER
Highlights
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs$(34)$(23)$(12)
Depreciation and amortization(15)(20)(25)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(38)(23)(33)
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges(53)(18)(121)
Net gain on disposition of assets11 145 
Operating loss(129)(82)(46)
Interest expense(34)(31)(47)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits 47 50 
Other (expense) income, net(4)(22)
Income tax provision(51)(58)(152)
Net loss including noncontrolling interest$(218)$(146)$(190)
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs$(39) $(23) $(65) 
Depreciation and amortization (24)  (14)  (11) 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (43)  (28)  (32) 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges (87)  (62)  (181) 
Net gain on disposition of assets 15
  2
  
 
Operating loss$(178) $(125) $(289) 
Interest expense (49)  (38)  (41) 
Other income, net 6
  7
  4
 
Income tax (provision) benefit (84)  (19)  1
 
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(305) $(175) $(325) 
The table below shows the reconciliation of net loss including noncontrolling interestsinterest to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, which are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on the calculation and reasons we include these measures, see note 1 under Results“Results of Operations – Consolidated Results – Selected Annual Financial Informationannual financial information” above.
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net loss including noncontrolling interest$(218)$(146)$(190)
Interest expense34 31 47 
Income tax provision51 58 152 
Depreciation and amortization15 20 25 
EBITDA(118)(37)34 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges53 18 121 
Inventory write-downs related to closures25 13 (1)
Start-up costs3 — 
Net gain on disposition of assets(11)(2)(145)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (47)(50)
Other expense (income), net4 22 (5)
Adjusted EBITDA$(44)$(33)$(38)

51

Table of Contents
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(305) $(175) $(325) 
Interest expense 49
  38
  41
 
Income tax provision (benefit) 84
  19
  (1) 
Depreciation and amortization 24
  14
  11
 
EBITDA$(148) $(104) $(274) 
Foreign exchange (gain) loss (9)  7
  4
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 87
  62
  181
 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 24
  7
  2
 
Start-up costs 27
  8
  5
 
Net gain on disposition of assets (15)  (2)  
 
Non-operating pension and OPEB (credits) costs (12)  8
  50
 
Acquisition-related costs 
  
  4
 
Other expense (income), net 3
  (14)  (8) 
Adjusted EBITDA$(43) $(28) $(36) 

20172020 vs. 20162019
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $39was $34 million in 2017 compared to $23 million in 2016. The current year included:2020, mainly reflecting:
write-downs of mill stores and other supplies inventory ($24 million), primarily related to the permanent closure of two paper machines in Calhoun at the end of the third quarter of 2017, a paper machine at our Catawba paper mill at the end of the second quarter of 2017, and our Mokpo paper mill in the first quarter of 2017;
start-up costs ($2225 million) related to the Calhoun tissue manufacturingtemporary idling of our Amos and converting facilityBaie-Comeau paper mills; and the restart of a paper machine in Alma; and
asset preservationstart-up costs ($93 million), primarily for the El Dorado sawmill.
In 2019, we incurred COS of $23 million, which included:
write-downs of mill stores and other supplies inventory ($13 million) related to the indefinite idling of our paper mill at Augusta; and
asset preservation costs ($5 million), mainly related to our indefinitely idled Thorold (Ontario) paper mill and our permanently closed Fort Frances (Ontario) mill;
offset in part by non-operating pension and OPEB credits ($14 million).
In 2016, we incurred COS of $23 million, which included:
write-downs of mill stores and other supplies ($7 million), mostly as a result of the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill;
non-operating pension and OPEB costs ($6 million);
start-up costs ($6 million) for the tissue manufacturing and converting facility and the continuous pulp digester project, both located in Calhoun; and
asset preservation costs ($3 million), primarily for the permanently closed Fort Frances mill.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $10$5 million higherlower in 2017, mainly because of2020 as the amortization of costs associated with the Calhoun tissue manufacturing and converting facility, and the additional costs related to the implementation of our integrated business management software.software was fully depreciated in the fourth quarter of 2019 ($4 million).
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A wasexpenses increased by $15 million in 2020, mainly due to higher in 2017, mainly because ofincentive plan expense, which is based on company performance, and higher stock-based compensation expense, including an $8 million increase in share-based compensation as a result of an increase in share price and the Company’s performance. The latter also caused an increase in short-term incentive programs. The additional SG&A related to our new tissue facility in Calhoun, recorded as start-up costs ($3 million), contributed as well to the overall increase.expense.
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges
We recorded closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $87 million in 2017, comprised of:
a long-lived asset impairment charge related to our Coosa Pines pulp mill ($55 million);
a long-lived asset impairment charge ($5 million) and severance and other closure-related costs ($6 million) in connection with the permanent closure of a paper machine at our Catawba paper mill;
accelerated depreciation ($6 million) and severance and other closure-related costs ($5 million) associated with the permanent closure of two paper machines in Calhoun; and
severance and other costs related to the permanent closure of our paper mill in Mokpo ($7 million).
In 2016,2020, we recorded closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $62$55 million, primarily forrelated to the temporary idling of our Amos and Baie-Comeau paper mills, including: accelerated depreciation charges of $38 million, and severance and other costs of $17 million.
This compares to closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $18 million in connection with the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta mill, and long-lived asset impairment charges mostly2019, related to the indefinite idling of our Mokpo recycled newsprint assets, due to declining market conditionspaper mill at Augusta, including: severance and rising recycled fiber prices.

other costs of $10 million; and accelerated depreciation charges of $8 million.
Net gain on disposition of assets
In 2017,2020, we recorded a net gain on disposition of assets of $15$11 million, compared to $2 million in the prior year. The difference mostly reflects, in the current year,2019, which reflected: the sale of the assets of our permanently closed MokpoAugusta paper mill for atotal cash consideration of $18$10 million, resulting in a net gain on disposition of assets$9 million; and the sale of $13the Thorold paper mill for total cash consideration of $4 million, resulting in a net gain of $2 million.
20162019 vs. 20152018
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs
COS were $23 million in 2016 (as further discussed above) compared to $65 million in 2015, which included:
non-operating pension and OPEB costs ($48 million);
asset preservation costs ($9 million) for the permanently closed Fort Frances, Laurentide (Quebec) and Iroquois Falls (Ontario) mills; and
start-up costs ($4 million), primarily related to the ramp-upFor a variance analysis of our Atikokan sawmill.2019 vs. 2018 results of operations, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Corporate and Other – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our 2019 Annual Report.
The lower non-operating pension and OPEB costs related mainly to a decrease in amortization
52

Table of actuarial losses due to the increase in discount rates in 2015, which in part caused the net pension and OPEB liability to decrease by $438 million in 2015, and a $14 million settlement charge related to annuity purchases for certain inactive U.S. employees in 2015.Contents
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges
We recorded closure costs, impairment and other related charges of $62 million in 2016 (as further discussed above) compared to $181 million in 2015, which included a long-lived asset impairment charge related to our Catawba paper assets ($176 million), as a result of the declining market conditions.
LIQUIDITYAND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources
We rely on cash and cash equivalents, net cash flows provided by operations, and our revolving credit facilitiesfacilities: to fund our operations,operations; to make pension contributions,contributions; and to finance our working capital, capital expenditures, and duty cash deposits.deposits and opportunities for our growth and transformation strategy. In addition, from time to time we may use available cash to reduce debt.debt and to return capital to shareholders, including through share repurchases or special dividends. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6$113 million and availability of $412$580 million under our revolving credit facilities.
Based on our current projections, we expect to have sufficient financial resources available to finance our business plan, make pension contributions, meet working capital and duty cash deposit requirements, and maintain an appropriate level of capital spending.
From time to time, basedBased on market conditions, we may seek to retire, repay or refinance our outstanding indebtedness including under our 2023 notes and credit facilities, through redemptions, prepayments, open market purchases or individually negotiated transactions, as we continue to focus on reducing costs and enhancing our flexibility.
The 2023 notesSenior Unsecured Notes
The 2023 notes areNotes, issued on May 8, 2013, were unsecured and are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The 2023 notesNotes bear interest at a rate of 5.875%; they were sold at an offering price of 99.062% of the $600 million aggregate principal amount and began paying interest semi-annually on November 15, 2013. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year.
The 2023 notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated May 8, 2013, by and among the Company, the guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The termsOn January 3, 2019, we repurchased $225 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2023 notes indenture impose certain restrictions, subjectNotes, pursuant to a numbernotes purchase agreement entered into on December 21, 2018, with certain noteholders, at a purchase price equal to 100% of exceptions and qualifications, including limits on our ability to:
incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness;
issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;
pay dividends or make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
make loans and investments;

incur liens;
issue dividends, make loans or transfer assets from our subsidiaries;
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;
consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person;
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
enter into new lines of business.
The 2023 notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, since May 15, 2017, at the redemption prices specified in the 2023 notes indenture,principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We couldAs a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $3 million in “Other (expense) income, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
On February 2, 2021, we completed the Offering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 2026 Notes at an issue price of 100%. The 2026 Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by all of our current and, subject to certain conditions, future material wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries. The Notes mature on March 1, 2026, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased, and will be required to make an offer to purchaserecorded in “Long-term debt” in our consolidated balance sheet at their fair value of $300 million. Interest on the notes uponis payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning on September 1, 2021.

We used the salenet proceeds of certain assets or uponthe Offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all of the remaining outstanding $375 million aggregate principal amount of our 2023 Notes, at a changeprice of control.100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. In connection with the redemption of all $375 million aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes (or, the “Redemption”), we placed, on February 2, 2021, the net proceeds of the closing of the Offering, together with additional cash, into trust for the benefit of the holders of the 2023 Notes. The Redemption occurred on February 18, 2021.
For more information, see Note 15, “Long-Term Debt – Debt instruments – Senior Unsecured Notes,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Senior secured credit facilitySecured Credit Facility
On September 7, 2016, we entered into the Seniora senior secured credit facility for up to $185 million. The SeniorThis senior secured credit facility providesprovided a Termterm loan of $46 million with a maturity date of September 7, 2025, and a Revolvingrevolving credit facility of up to $139 million with a maturity date of September 7, 2022,2022. On October 28, 2019, we entered into an amended and restated senior secured credit facility (or, the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”) for up to $360 million, replacing our existing $185 million senior secured credit facility. The Senior Secured Credit Facility provided a term loan facility of up to $180 million with a delayed draw period of up to three years, and the choice of maturities of six to 10 years (or, the “Term Loan Facility”), and a six-year revolving credit facility of up to $180 million with a maturity date of October 28, 2025 (or, the “Revolving Credit Facility”). In March 2020, we borrowed $180 million in term loans under the Term Loan Facility for 10 years, maturing in March 2030. There is also provides an uncommitted option to increase the Senior secured credit facilitySecured Credit Facility by up to $175an additional $360 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2017,On October 28, 2019, we had $56repaid our $46 million of availabilityterm loan by borrowing under the Revolving credit facility, net of $83 million of borrowings.Credit Facility.
The obligations under the Senior secured credit facilitySecured Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain material U.S. subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by a first priority mortgage on the real property of our Calhoun facility and a first priority security interest on the fixtures and equipment located therein, and related assets.therein.
Interest rates under the Senior secured credit facility are based, at the Company’s election, on either a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (or the “LIBOR”), or a base rate, in each case plus a spread over the index. The base rate is the highest
53

Table of (i) the prime rate; (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%; and (iii) the one-month LIBOR plus 1%. The applicable spread over the index fluctuates quarterly based upon the Company’s capitalization ratio, which is defined as the ratioContents
As of the Company’s funded indebtedness to the sumDecember 31, 2020, we had $180 million of the Company’s funded indebtedness and its net worth. For the Term loan, the applicable spread ranges from 0.875% to 1.5% for base rate loans, and from 1.875% to 2.5% for LIBOR loans. For loansavailability under the Revolving credit facility, the applicable spread ranges from 0.5%Credit Facility, which was undrawn.
For more information, see Note 15, “Long-Term Debt – Debt instruments – Senior Secured Credit Facility,” to 1.125% for base rate loans, and from 1.5% to 2.125% for LIBOR loans. The Senior secured credit facility was issued by lenders within the farm credit system and is eligible for patronage refunds. Patronage refunds are distributions of profits from lenders in the farm credit system, which are cooperatives that are required to distribute profits to their members. Patronage distributions, which are made in either cash or stock, are received in the year after they were earned. Future refunds are dependent on future farm credit lender profits, made at the discretion of each farm credit lender.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the Senior secured credit facility,ABL Credit Facility
On May 14, 2019, we are required to pay a fee in respect of unutilized commitments under the Revolving credit facility equal to 0.325% per annum when average daily utilization under the Revolving credit facility for the prior fiscal quarter is less than or equal to 35% of the total revolving commitments, and 0.275% per annum when average daily utilization under the Revolving credit facility for the prior fiscal quarter is greater than 35% of the total revolving commitments.
Base rate loans under the Senior secured credit facility may be repaid from time to time at our discretion without premium or penalty. LIBOR loans may be repaid from time to time at our discretion, subject to breakage costs, if any. Amounts repaid on the Term loan may not be subsequently re-borrowed. Principal amounts under the Revolving credit facility may be drawn, repaid, and redrawn until September 6, 2022.
Pursuantentered into an amendment to the Senior securedfive-year credit facility, we are also required to maintain a capitalization ratio not greater than 45% at all times, available liquidity of not less than $100 million, and a collateral coverage ratio of not less than 1.8 to 1.0 (each as defined in the Senior secured credit facility). In addition, the Senior secured credit facility contains certain covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, including, among others: (i) requirements to deliver financial statements, other reports and notices; (ii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence and repayment of indebtedness; (iii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence of liens; (iv) restrictions on the Company and certain of its subsidiaries making certain restricted payments; (v) restrictions on making certain investments; (vi) restrictions on certain mergers, consolidations, and asset dispositions; (vii) restrictions on transactions with affiliates; and (viii) restrictions on modifications to material indebtedness. The Senior secured credit facility includes customary representations and warranties, and, subject to customary grace periods and notice requirements, also contains certain customary events of default.

ABL credit facility
Onagreement dated May 22, 2015, we entered into a five-yearfor our ABL Credit Facility. The amended credit agreement provides for an extension of the ABL credit facility,maturity date to May 14, 2024, with an aggregate lender commitment of up to $600$500 million at any time outstanding, subject to borrowing base availability based on specified advance rates, eligibility criteria and customary reserves. The ABL credit facility will mature on May 22, 2020. As of December 31, 2017, we had $356 million of availability under the ABL credit facility, net of $61 million of borrowings and $40 million of ordinary course letters of credit outstanding.
The aggregate lender commitment under the facility includes a $60 million swingline sub-facility and a $200 million letter of credit sub-facility, and we may convert up to $50 million of the commitments under the facility to a first-in last-out facility, or “FILO facility,” subject to the consent of each converting lender. The ABL credit facilityCredit Facility also provides for an uncommitted ability to increase the revolving credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.
Revolving loan (and letter of credit) availability under the credit agreement is subject to a borrowing base, which is determined on the basis of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and cash and the value of permitted investments held in deposit accounts controlled solely by the administrative and collateral agent. The FILO facility is also subject to a borrowing base, which is determined on the basis of eligible accounts receivable and inventory.
The obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by certain material subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by first priority liens on and security interests in accounts receivable, inventory and related assets.
LoansAs of December 31, 2020, we had $270 million of availability under the ABL Credit Facility, which was undrawn except for $56 million of ordinary course letters of credit agreementoutstanding.
Effective January 21, 2021, we reduced the commitment under the Canadian tranche of our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility by $50 million, to $250 million, resulting in an aggregate commitment of $450 million, subject to borrowing base limitations.
For more information, see Note 15, “Long-Term Debt – Debt instruments – ABL Credit Facility,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loan Facility
On November 4, 2020, our Canadian subsidiary, Resolute FP Canada Inc., entered into a Loan Facility with Investissement Québec as lender for up to C$220 million ($173 million as of December 31, 2020), representing up to 75% of the countervailing and anti-dumping duty deposits (or, the “Duties”) imposed or expected to be imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and collected by Customs and Border Protection Agency (or, “U.S. Customs”) on U.S. imports of applicable softwood lumber products produced at sawmills of the Borrower and its affiliates located in the province of Quebec, Canada from April 28, 2017 to December 31, 2022.
The borrowings under the Loan Facility bear interest at a floating rate equal to 1.45% above the base rate,one-month Canadian Banker’s Acceptance rate. The Loan Facility provides for a maximum of 10 draws and the LIBOR, or the Canadian banker’s acceptance (or “BA”) rate, infulfillment of certain conditions upon each case plus an applicable margin.draw. The applicable margin is between 0.00% and 0.75% with respect to base rate loans and between 1.00% and 1.75% with respect to LIBOR and Canadian BA loans, in each case based on availability under the credit facility and a leverage ratio.
Loans outstanding under the FILO facility bear interest at a rate that is 1.25% per annum higher than the interest rate payable on revolving loans not made under the FILO facility.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal underis repayable in consecutive monthly installments over a period of eight years, after an interest only period of two years from the ABL credit facility, we are required to pay a fee in respect of unutilized commitments under the ABL credit facility equal to 0.30% per annum when average daily utilization under the ABL credit facility for the prior fiscal quarter is less than 35%date of the total revolving commitments, and 0.25% per annum when average daily utilization under the ABL credit facility for the prior fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 35% of the total revolving commitments, as well as a fee in respect of outstanding letters of credit (equal to the applicable margin in respect of LIBOR and Canadian BA loans plus a fronting fee of 0.125% and certain administrative fees).
Base rate loans under the ABL credit facilityfirst draw. Outstanding amounts may be repaid from time toprepaid, partially or fully, at any time at our discretion, without premium or penalty. LIBOR and Canadian BA rate loans may be repaid from time to time at our discretion,penalty, but subject to breakage costs, if any. However, no loans under the FILO facility can be repaid unless all other loans under the credit agreement are repaid first.payment of accrued and unpaid interest. We are required to repay outstanding loans that exceedmake a prepayment equal to any amounts reimbursed by U.S. Customs on account of the maximum availability thenU.S. imports of certain softwood lumber products produced at our sawmills located in effect.the province of Quebec, Canada (or, the “Quebec Prepayments”).
The creditobligations under the Loan Facility will be secured by a first priority security interest and a control agreement contains customary covenants for asset-based credit agreements of this type, including, among other things: (i) requirements to deliver financial statements, other reports and notices; (ii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence and repayment of indebtedness by the Company and its subsidiaries; (iii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence of liens by the Company and its subsidiaries; (iv) restrictions on the Company and certain of its subsidiaries making certain restricted payments; (v) restrictionsour bank accounts identified to receive any Quebec Prepayments. In addition, we have agreed to transfer to the designated bank accounts any amounts constituting Quebec Prepayments, and may not grant any other security interest on the Company andsuch bank accounts. The Loan Facility is required to be used exclusively to finance certain of its subsidiaries making certain investments; (vi) restrictions on certain mergers, consolidationsour activities and asset dispositions; (vii) restrictions on transactions with affiliates; (viii) restrictions on amendmentsobligations in the province of Quebec, Canada, and may not be used to pay or modifications to the Canadian pension plans; (ix) restrictions on modifications to material indebtedness; and (x) a springing requirement for the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as determined under the credit agreement,reimburse any Duties.
As of 1.0:1.0, anytimeDecember 31, 2020, we had C$165 million ($130 million) of availability under the facility falls below the greaterLoan Facility, subject to certain conditions. The Loan Facility was undrawn as of $50 million or 10%December 31, 2020.
For more information, see Note 15, “Long-Term Debt – Loan Facility,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
54

Table of the maximum available borrowing amount for two consecutive business days. Subject to customary grace periods and notice requirements, the credit agreement also contains certain customary events of default.Contents
Credit rating risk
Although our debt agreements do not include any provision that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade, we believe our access to capital markets at a reasonable cost is determined in part by credit quality. A credit rating downgrade could impact our ability to access capital markets at a reasonable cost.

  
December 31,
 201720162015
Standard & Poor’s   
Long-term corporate credit ratingBB-BB-BB-
OutlookNegativeNegativeStable
Moody’s Investors Service   
Senior unsecured debtB2B1Ba3
Corporate family ratingB1Ba3Ba3
OutlookStableStableStable
Liquidity ratingSGL-1SGL-1SGL-1
Subject to other factors affecting the credit markets as a whole, we believe our current ratings should provide a significant degree of flexibility in obtaining funds on competitive terms. These security ratings reflect the views of the rating agencies only. An explanation of the significance of these ratings can be obtained from each rating agency. The ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Any rating can be revised upward or downward or withdrawn at any time by a rating agency.
December 31,
 202020192018
Standard & Poor’s
Senior unsecured debtBB+B+
Long-term corporate credit ratingB+BB-BB-
OutlookNegativeStableStable
Moody’s Investors Service
Senior unsecured debtB2B1B1
Corporate family ratingB1Ba3Ba3
OutlookNegativeStableStable
Liquidity ratingSGL-2SGL-1SGL-1
On January 19, 2021, both rating outlooks were revised from negative to stable and the Moody’s liquidity rating was upgraded to SGL-1.
Flow of Funds
Summary of cash flows
A summary of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was as follows:
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202020192018
Net cash provided by operating activities$334 $85 $435 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(297)(162)146 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities78 (228)(281)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash2 (4)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash$117 $(303)$296 
  
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Net cash provided by operating activities$158
 $81
 $138
 
Net cash used in investing activities (192)  (273)  (352) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 3
  169
  (62) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2
  
  (3) 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(29) $(23) $(279) 
2020 vs. 2019
2017 vs. 2016
CashNet cash provided by operating activities
We generated $158$334 million of cash from operating activities in 2017,2020, compared to $81$85 million last year. The increase is mainly attributable to higher profitability, a favorable working capital variance in the current period, and lower pension contributions (as further discussed below), partly offset by higher working capital and start-up costs for the tissue manufacturing and converting facility in Calhoun.contributions.
CashNet cash used in investing activities
We used $192$297 million of cash in investing activities in 2017, a decrease of $81 million2020, compared to last year, reflecting lower cash invested$162 million in fixed assets of $85 million, mainly due to the substantial completionprior year. The difference reflects:
the acquisition of the tissue manufacturing and converting facility in CalhounU.S. Sawmill Business, net of cash acquired, in the first quarter of 2017,current period ($172 million); and the disposition of the assets of our permanently closed paper mill in Mokpo in 2017, for a cash consideration of $18 million, offset in part by
higher countervailing and anti-dumping duty cash deposits during($29 million);
55

Table of Contents
offset in part by:
lower capital expenditures ($35 million) and higher disposition of assets ($11 million); and
proceeds from an insurance recovery related to our acquisition of Atlas in 2015 ($15 million), in the year of $26 million on our imports of softwood lumber products to the U.S. from our Canadian mills (as further discussed below).current period.
CashNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
We borrowed $19 was $78 million under our credit facilities in 2017,2020, compared to $171cash used in financing activities of $228 million in 2016, primarily2019. The difference reflects:
proceeds from long term debt of $180 million in 10-year term loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facility to supportfinance the tissue project, which was substantially completed at the endacquisition of the first quarterU.S. Sawmill Business, whereas in the year ago period we repurchased $225 million in aggregate principal amount of 2017. Since then, we haveour 2023 Notes and repaid $99our $46 million term loan;
partly offset by:
repayments of $71 million under our revolving credit facilities forin the remainder of the year. In 2017, we also acquired the 49% equity interest held by The New York Times Company in Donohue Malbaie Inc. for a cash purchase price of $15 million. We already owned 51% of the shares of Donohue Malbaie Inc.

2016 vs. 2015
Cash provided by operating activities
We generated $81 million of cash from operating activities in 2016,current year, compared to $138borrowings of $71 million in 2015. The decrease is attributable to higher pension contributions mostly related tothe prior year.
2019 vs. 2018
For a Cdn $25 million supplemental contribution in 2016 (as further discussed below), and to an increase of inventory in 2016 compared to a decrease in 2015, mostly related to raw material inventory at somevariance analysis of our sawmills.
Cash used in investing activities
We used $273 million in investing activities in 2016, compared to $352 million in 2015. The decrease is mainly due to the acquisition2019 vs. 2018 cash flows, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Atlas Tissue in 2015, partly offset by more cash invested in fixed assets,Financial Condition and an increase in countervailing duty cash deposits, which have been required at a rateResults of 17.87% since October 20, 2015. Investing activities in 2016 consisted mostlyOperations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Flow of cash invested in fixed assets, which reflected investments in strategic projects such as: the tissue manufacturing and converting facility in Calhoun as well as the implementationFunds – 2019 vs. 2018,” of our integrated business management software.2019 Annual Report.
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
We borrowed $171 million under our credit facilities in 2016, to sustain the capital expenditures for our continued transformation strategy. In 2015, we used $62 million in financing activities, almost all of which related to share repurchases.
20182021 outlook
For 2018,2021, we expect to invest $200$95 million in capital expenditures, net of supportfunding under existing business development programs, including severalincluding: $10 million for the recently acquired U.S. Sawmill Business; and investments to improvefor the cellulose filament plant in Kénogami, and for the improvement of productivity and yields at our sawmills, as well as to increase our pulp production capacity.sawmills.
Countervailing duty and anti-dumping investigations
Since October 15, 2015, we have been required to pay cash deposits at a subsidy rate of 17.87% for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports of SC papers produced at our Canadian mills. On January 3, 2018, the U.S. Department of Commerce (or “Commerce”) announced its preliminary determinations in its first administrative review, whereby it determined that we received countervailable subsidies of 1.79% that benefited our Canadian production of SC paper during the relevant period (from August 3, 2015 to December 31, 2015). We are still required to continue making cash deposits at the 17.87% rate until Commerce sets a countervailing duty rate in this administrative review. Based on our current operating parameters, the cash deposits could be as high as $25 million per year.softwood lumber
We also became required to pay cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties on the vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills, since April 28, 2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the rates for these estimated countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties were 14.7%19.10% and 3.2%1.15%, respectively. Based on our current operating parameters, the cash deposits could be as high as $80 million per year.
Additionally, since January 16, 2018, we have been required to make cash deposits at a subsidy rate of 4.42% for estimated countervailing duties on uncoated groundwood paper we import to the U.S. from our Canadian mills. Based on the 4.42% rate and our current operating parameters, the cash deposits could be as high as $20 million per year. Commerce has not yet issued its preliminary determinations in its anti-dumping investigation.
For additional information, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors – Legal and Compliance RiskRisks – We are subject to countervailing orand anti-dumping dutiesduty orders on our U.S. imports of paper products and substantially allthe vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian mills,sawmills, which could materially affect our operations and cash flows,” of this Form 10‑K.K, and Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Legal matters – Countervailing duty and anti-dumping investigations of softwood lumber,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
56

Table of Contents
Employee Benefit Plans
Pension and OPEB plans
In 2017,2020, we contributed $111$91 million to our defined benefit pension plans and $21$17 million to our defined contribution pension plans, while expensing anrecognizing a $19 million cost in aggregate, of $40 million, excluding closure-related costs.before special events. We also made payments of $11 million to OPEB plans, compared to an $11while recognizing a $5 million credit to the net periodic benefit cost. Defined benefitcost, before special events.
In December 2020, the pension plan contributions droppedof the Thorold paper mill, which was indefinitely idled in 2017 and sold in 2020, was wound-up following the approval of the pension benefits distribution and assets liquidation. This resulted in the conversion of the buy-in annuity contract to a buy-out contract, and the recognition of a settlement loss of $28 million in "Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the reduction of both pension plan assets and pension benefit obligations by $30 million when compared to 2016, mostly as a result of our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation (as further discussed and defined below).

$98 million.
For 2018,2021, we expect to make approximately $105$102 million of contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, $20$17 million to our defined contribution pension plans, and $15$12 million to OPEB plans. We alsoThe expected $11 million increase in defined benefit pension plan contributions is mainly a result of the substantial drop in discount rates from prior years.
For 2021, we expect to expense approximately $20$17 million of defined contribution pension plan costs, with creditsa defined benefit pension cost of $22$17 million and $13a $6 million credit for our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, respectively.plans. The expected decrease$15 million increase in the net periodic benefit cost compared to 2017pension plan expenses from 2020 is due to amainly explained by higher expected return on plan assets, and lower amortization of actuarial gains and losses, for U.S. pension plan, which became predominantly inactive at year-end, resultingmostly as a result of the substantial drop in a longer amortization period.discount rates from prior years.
We fund our pension and OPEB plans as required by applicable laws and regulations; we could, from time to time, make additional contributions.
PensionCanadian pension funding
CanadianQuebec plans
The funding requirements
Prior to December 31, 2016, the funding of our material Canadian registered pension plans, which we refer to as the “affected plans,” was governed by regulations specific to us, adopted by the provinces of Quebec and Ontario. We refer to these regulations, as the “funding relief regulations.” On December 16, 2016, the province of Ontario amended the Ontario funding relief regulation, which we refer to as the “Ontario amendment,” following which, on December 19, 2016, we provided notice to the Quebec pension plan regulatory authorities that we would voluntarily exit the Quebec funding relief regulation as of December 31, 2016. As a result, since January 1, 2017, all of our Quebec pension plans have beenis subject to Quebec’s Supplemental Pension Plans Act (or, the “SPPA”), which is the pension plan funding regime generally applicable to pension plans in that province. Our contributions to our Quebec plans are determined on a going concern basis under the Quebec’s SPPA.
Ontario plans
Since January 1, 2019, all of our Ontario pension plans are subject to the SupplementalOntario Pension PlansBenefits Act, as amended (or, the SPPAPBA”), which is the pension plan funding regime generally applicable to pension plans in that province. The OntarioPBA provides for funding relief regulation, as amended by the Ontario amendment, continues to apply to us and will end on December 31, 2020.
As a result of the Ontario amendment and our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, from July 2017 through December 2020, our annual basic contribution to the Ontario affected plans became Cdn $9 million, compared to the basic contribution from January 2017 to June 2017 of Cdn $5 million for the six-month period. Our contributions to our Quebec plans are determined annuallypension fund deficits on a going concern basis, underor on a solvency basis if the Quebec’s SPPA, as more fully described below.
In addition to the basic contribution, the funding relief regulations required us to makesolvency funded status of a supplemental contribution, beginning in 2016, should the affected plans’ aggregate solvency ratio be more than 2% below the target specified in the regulations for the preceding year, subject to certain conditions. Following the Ontario amendment and our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, we are still required to make a supplemental contribution to the Ontario plans, payable over a three-year period, should the Ontario affected plans’ aggregate solvency ratio be below the 2% target. Given the prevailing interest rates, we do not expect to make a supplemental contribution in 2018.
Should an Ontario plan move to surplus before the funding relief regulation expires in 2020, it will cease to be subject to the Ontario funding relief regulation. After 2020, the Ontario plans will become subject to Ontario funding rules in effect at that time.
We are permitted to exit the Ontario funding relief regulation earlier than December 31, 2020, by providing a notice to that effect to the province of Ontario by December 31 of any year. Our exit from such regulation would take effect for the year following the date of notice. If we elect to exit the Ontario funding relief regulation, our pension plans in Ontario would become subject to the pension plan funding regime generally applicable at that time to pension plans in that province.is below 85%.
Funding deficit calculation
The assumptions used to calculate the pension funding deficit are materially different from the assumptions used to determine the net pension obligations for purposes of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result of our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, theThe funding deficit calculation of all our Quebec pension plans areis subject to since January 1, 2017, Quebec’s SPPA, which provides for the funding of pension deficits on a going concern basis. The funding deficit calculation of our Ontario pension plans is subject to Ontario’s PBA, which provides for the funding of pension fund deficits on a going concern basis, rather thanor on a solvency basis.basis if the solvency funded status of a pension plan is below 85%. Under a going concern basis, the liabilities are calculated on the assumption that the plans will continue to operate indefinitely, and the liabilities are discounted withusing a rate determined by a model that develops an expected long-term return on assets, based on the asset mix of the plans as of the actuarial valuation date.
Our Ontario pension plans remain subject to actuarial rules on The liabilities also include a solvency basisprovision for funding pension deficits, with a fixed annual basic contribution of Cdn $9 million.adverse deviation. Under a solvency basis, the liabilities are calculated on the assumption that the plans are terminated at the measurement date, (each December 31), and the liabilities are discounted primarily using a specified annuity purchase rate, which is the spot interest rate on government securities in Canada plus a prescribed margin at the measurement date.

The funding of our U.S. pension plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code, and is also subject to the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, and the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014.2014, and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Under these regulations, the liabilities are discounted using 25-year average corporate bond rates within a specified corridor. TheThe corridor will be maintained at 10% through 2020, will widen to 15% in 2018,2021, and will widen an additional 5% each year to 30% in 20212024 and beyond.
57

Table of Contents
By contrast, for purposes of our Consolidated Financial Statements, the discount rate is determined with a model that develops a hypothetical high-quality bond portfolio, where the bonds are theoretically purchased to settle the expected benefit payments of the plans.
The weighted-average discount rate, funded ratio, and deficit of the pension plans for both accounting and funding purposes for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were as follows:
AccountingFunding
December 31,December 31,
(In millions, except percentages)
202020192020(1)2019(2)
Discount rate2.5 %3.0 %5.1 %5.6 %
Funded ratio73 %74 %86 %88 %
Deficit$(1,440)$(1,326)$(629)$(497)
 Accounting
Funding (1)
 December 31,December 31,
(In millions, except percentages)
2017  2016  2017 
(2) 
2016  
Discount rate 3.6%  3.8%  4.9%  5.0% 
Funded ratio 80%  78%  89%  91% 
Deficit$(1,097) $(1,123) $(579) $(621) 
(1)Determined on a going concern basis for Canadian plans, and on a 25-year average interest rate basis for U.S. plans, and assuming actuarial valuations performed for all plans on December 31, 2020.
(1)
(2)Determined on a going concern basis for Canadian plans, and on a 25-year average interest rate basis for U.S. plans.
Determined on a going-concern basis for Quebec plans, on a solvency basis for Ontario plans, and on a 25-year average interest rate basis for U.S. plans.
(2)
Preliminary, subject to final actuarial reports.
Additional undertakings
In connectionOur principal Canadian subsidiaries had entered into certain undertakings with the establishmentGovernment of Ontario and Quebec, which expired in 2015 and 2016, respectively. The expiration of those undertakings did not eliminate ongoing obligations we incurred under the original funding relief regulations, our principal Canadian operating subsidiaries undertookterms of those undertakings prior to their expiration, including the undertaking requiring us to make an additional solvency deficit reduction contribution to our pension plans of Cdn $75 to the affected plans,C$75, payable over four years, for each metric ton of capacity reduced in Quebec or Ontario, in the event of any permanent machine closure or temporary downtime of more than six consecutive months or nine cumulative months over a period of 18 months. As a result of our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, effective December 31, 2016, this undertakingAccordingly, we had made with the Government of Quebec, expired in accordance with its terms. The undertaking with Ontario expired in December 2015. Neither the expiration of the Quebec undertakings, nor the Ontario undertakings, eliminated ongoing obligations we incurred under the terms of those undertakings prior to their expiration.
As part of the 2014 amendments to the funding relief regulations, it was determined that no additional contribution would be made in respect of any capacity reduction in Quebec before April 13, 2013. Also, on March 31, 2017, we reached an agreement with the province of Ontario stipulating that we would no longer be required to make additional contributions for capacity reductions that occurred in Ontario after April 15, 2014. As a result of this agreement, our requirement to make additional contributions to the Ontario affected plans was reduced by Cdn $16 million for 2017 and Cdn $8 million for 2018. We made additional contributions for past capacity reductions to the affected plans of Cdn $14C$4 million and C$2 million in 2017 and will also be required to make our final remaining contributions for past capacity reductions of approximately Cdn $11 million, Cdn $4 million, and Cdn $2 million in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.
As originally adopted, The 2020 contribution was the funding relief regulations provided that corrective measures wouldlast one required to be required if the aggregate
solvency ratio in the affected plans fell below a prescribed level under the targets specified by the regulations as of
December 31 in any year through 2014. This requirement was definitively removed in 2013, but under the Ontario regulation,
the corresponding 2011 and 2012 amountsmade in respect of Ontario plans (Cdn $110 million in the aggregate) have been deferred to after the expiration of the funding relief regulations in 2020, and will then be payable over five years in equal monthly installments starting on December 31, 2021, but only up to the elimination of the then remaining deficit, if any.these undertakings.
Partial wind-ups of pension plans
On June 12, 2012, we filed a motion for directives with the Quebec Superior Court, the court with jurisdiction in the creditor protection proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (the(or, theCCAA Creditor protection proceedingsProtection Proceedings”), seeking an order to prevent pension regulators in each of Quebec, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador from declaring partial wind-ups of pension plans relating to employees of former operations in New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador, or a declaration that any claim for accelerated reimbursements of deficits arising from a partial wind-up is a barred claim under the CCAA Creditor protection proceedings.Protection Proceedings. We contend, among other things, that any such declaration, if issued, would be inconsistent with the Quebec Superior Court’s sanction order confirming the CCAA debtors’ CCAA Plan of Reorganization and Compromise, as amended, and the terms of our emergence from the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings. A partial wind-up would likely shorten the period

in which any deficit within those plans, which could reach up to Cdn $150C$150 million ($120 million, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017)118 million), would have to be funded if we do not obtain the relief sought. NoThe hearing date has been set to date. At this time, we cannot estimate the additional contributions, if any, that may be required in future years, but they could be material. Although no hearing date has been set, this matter is currently expected to be heardcould occur in 2018.2021.
Share Repurchase Program
On May 28, 2015,March 2, 2020, our board of directors authorized a $50share repurchase program of up to 15% of our common stock, for an aggregate consideration of up to $100 million. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 6.9 million increase toshares at a cost of $30 million under this program. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased 4.8 million shares at a cost of $24 million under our existing $100$150 million share repurchase program, which was originally launchedcompleted in May of 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased an additional 5.5 million shares, at a cost of $59 million.2019. We did not repurchase any shares during 20172018.
Dividends
We declared and 2016. There remains $24 million underpaid a special dividend of $1.50 per share ($136 million) on our common stock in 2018. We did not declare or pay any dividends on our common stock during the program.years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
58

Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s contractual obligations, including payments due by period, were as follows:
(In millions)Total20212022-20232024-20252026 and thereafter
Long-term debt (1)
$656 $28 $419 $10 $199 
Non-cancelable operating lease obligations (2)
82 12 19 13 38 
Purchase obligations (2)
202 73 109 16 
 $940 $113 $547 $27 $253 
(In millions)Total  2018  2019-2020  2021-2022  Thereafter 
Long-term debt (1)
$1,024
 $43
 $145
 $163
 $673
 
Non-cancelable operating lease obligations (2)
 35
  7
  12
  8
  8
 
Purchase obligations (2)
 268
  81
  108
  49
  30
 
 $1,327
 $131
 $265
 $220
 $711
 
(1)Long-term debt obligations primarily represent interest payments and the payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity of our 2023 Notes, assuming no prior redemptions. Interest on our credit facility borrowings is assumed to remain unchanged from the rates in effect as of December 31, 2020, assuming no additional borrowings or repayments until maturity. Information on our long-term debt can be found in “Note 15, “Long-Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The 2023 Notes were redeemed subsequent to year-end, see Note 23, “Subsequent Events,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Information on our operating leases and purchase obligations can be found in Note 12, “Operating Leases” and Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies – Commitments,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(1)
Long-term debt commitments represent primarily interest payments on the 2023 notes over the periods indicated and payment of the remaining principal balance at maturity, assuming no prior redemptions. Interest on our credit facility borrowings is assumed to remain unchanged from the rates in effect as of December 31, 2017, assuming no additional borrowings or repayments until maturity. Information on our long-term debt can be found in “Note 13, “Long-Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Information on our operating leases and purchase obligations can be found in Note 19, “Operating Leases and Purchase Obligations,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The above table excludes the future obligations under our pension and OPEB plans due to the uncertainty in the timing and amount of future payments. Information on our pension and OPEB plans can be found in Note 14,“Note 16, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans,,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
RECENTACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
New accounting pronouncements adopted as of December 31, 2017in 2020
See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – New accounting pronouncements adopted as of December 31, 2017,in 2020,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of December 31, 20172020
See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of December 31, 2017,2020,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make accounting estimates based on assumptions, judgments and projections of future results of operations and cash flows. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements.
We base our estimates, assumptions and judgments on a number of factors, including historical experience, recent events, existing conditions, internal budgets and forecasts, projections obtained from industry research firms, and other data that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We believe that our accounting estimates are appropriate and that the resulting financial statement amounts are reasonable. Due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could differ materially from these estimates, requiring adjustments to financial statement amounts in future periods.
A summary of our significant accounting policies is disclosed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Based upon a review of our significant accounting policies, we believe the following accounting policies require us to make accounting estimates that can significantly affect the results reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We have reported the development, selection and disclosures of our critical accounting estimates to the audit committee of our board of directors, and the audit committee has reviewed the disclosures relating to these estimates.
59

Table of Contents
Pension and OPEB obligations
Description of accounts impacted by the accounting estimates
We record pension and OPEB obligations, net of pension plan assets that may be considered material to our financial position. We also record net periodic benefit costscost (credit) associated with these net obligations as our employees render service. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had pension and OPEB obligations aggregating $5,646$5,382 million and accumulated pension plan assets at fair value of $4,377$3,806 million. Our 2017In 2020, we recorded a net periodic benefit cost was $13of $15 million.
Judgments and uncertainties involved in the accounting estimates
The following inputs are used to determine our net obligations and our net periodic benefit cost (credit) each year and the determination of these inputs requires judgment:
discount rate – used to determine the net present value of our pension and OPEB obligations and to determine the interest cost component of our net periodic benefit cost;
return on assets – used to estimate the growth in the value of invested assets that are available to satisfy pension benefit obligations and to determine the expected return on plan assets component of our net periodic pension benefit cost;
life expectancy rate – used to estimate the impact of life expectancy on our pension and OPEB obligations;
rate of compensation increase – used to calculate the impact future pay increases will have on our pension obligations; and
health care cost trend rate – used to calculate the impact of future health care costs on our OPEB obligations.
(credit). The discount rate for our domestic and foreign plans was determined with a model that develops a hypothetical high-quality bond portfolio, where the bonds are theoretically purchased to settle the expected benefit payments of the plans. The discount rate reflects the single rate that produces the same discounted values as the value of the theoretical high-quality bond portfolio.portfolio;
return on assets – used to estimate the growth in the value of invested assets that are available to satisfy pension benefit obligations and to determine the expected return on plan assets component of our net periodic pension benefit cost (credit). In determining the expected return on assets, we considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio.portfolio;
life expectancy rate – used to estimate the impact of life expectancy on our pension and OPEB obligations. In determining the life expectancy rate of our domestic and foreign plans, we used the most recent actuarially-determined mortality tables and improvement scales. For the foreign plans, the mortality tables were adjusted with the result of our historical mortality experience study. The rates used are consistent with our future expectations of life expectancy for the employees who participate in our pension and OPEB plans.plans;
rate of compensation increase – used to calculate the impact future pay increases will have on our pension obligations. In determining the rate of compensation increase, we reviewed historical salary increases and promotions, while considering current industry conditions, the terms of collective bargaining agreements with our employees and the outlook for our industry.industry; and
health care cost trend rate – used to calculate the impact of future health care costs on our OPEB obligations. For the health care cost trend rate, we considered historical trends for these costs, as well as recently enacted healthcare legislation.

Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
Variations in assumptions could have a significant effect on the net periodic benefit cost and pension and OPEB obligations reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For example, a 25 basis point change in any one of these assumptions would have increased (decreased) our net periodic benefit cost for our pension and OPEB plans and our pension and OPEB obligations as follows:
2017 Net Periodic Benefit Cost Pension and OPEB Obligations as of December 31, 20172020 Net Periodic Benefit CostsPension and OPEB Obligations as of December 31, 2020
(In millions)25 Basis Point Increase25 Basis Point Decrease 25 Basis Point Increase25 Basis Point Decrease
(In millions)25 Basis Point Increase25 Basis Point Decrease25 Basis Point Increase25 Basis Point Decrease
Assumption:         Assumption:
Discount rate$(6) $7
 $(137) $150
 Discount rate$— $$(128)$141 
Return on assets (10) 10
 
 
 Return on assets$(9)$$— $— 
Rate of compensation increase 1
 (1) 4
 (4) Rate of compensation increase$— $— $$(2)
Health care cost trend rate 
 
 2
 (2) Health care cost trend rate$— $— $$(1)
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the most significant change in our assumptions affecting our pension and OPEB obligations was a decrease in the discount rate to 3.6%2.5% from 3.8%3.0% as of December 31, 2016,2019, resulting in an actuarial loss of $285 million and a corresponding increase in our net pension and OPEB obligationsobligations.
60

Table of approximately $148 million.Contents
The net periodic benefit cost of our pension plans incorporates an expected return on plan assets and not the actual return on plan assets, andassets. The difference between the net periodic benefit cost of our pension and OPEB plans is based on the expected change in pension and OPEB obligations arising from the time value of money and not the actual change in pension and OPEB obligations. Differences between these expected and actual resultsreturn on plan assets resulted in an actuarial gain of $15 million in 2020.
These net actuarial losses of $244 million in 2020, before tax, were recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive loss” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as an actuarial gain or loss. Net losses arising in 2017, before tax, and deferred in “accumulated other comprehensive loss” were $57 million and increased our accumulated net actuarial loss. This actuarial loss will be amortized into our Consolidated Statements of Operations in future years, andincluding approximately $34$77 million will be included in our net periodic benefit cost in 2018.2021.
Deferred income tax assets
Description of accounts impacted by the accounting estimates
We have net deferred income tax assets of $1,063$915 million recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017, almost2020, all of which is related to our Canadian operations,operations; and a full valuation allowance is recorded against virtually all of our U.S. net deferred income tax assets. Our net deferred income tax assets are primarily comprised of:
U.S.:
Deferreddeferred income tax assets of $718$804 million, comprised of $561which $544 million is for federal and state net operating loss carryforwards expiring between 2021 and 2037,2040; $103 million for federal and state net operating loss and deduction limitation carryforwards with no expiry; and $157 million for other temporary differences, mostly related to pension and OPEB plans.plans;
Deferreddeferred income tax liabilities of $8$67 million, for various temporary differences.mostly related to tax accelerated depreciation on fixed assets; and
Aa valuation allowance of $709$737 million against the net deferred income tax assets, which are not more likely than not to be realized in the future.future;
Canada:
Deferreddeferred income tax assets of $1,094$981 million, comprised of $196$195 million related to undeducted research and development expenditures with no expiry, $18 million for federal and provincial operating loss carryforwards expiring between 2030 and 2037, $96expiry; $78 million for tax credit carryforwards expiring between 20212022 and 2037,2040; $12 million for federal and provincial net operating loss carryforwards expiring between 2028 and 2039; as well as $784$696 million for other temporary differences, mostly related to fixed asset undepreciated capital costs with no expiry, as well as pension and OPEB plans.plans;
Deferreddeferred income tax liabilities of $19$30 million for various temporary differences.differences; and
Aa valuation allowance of $13$36 million, primarilyvirtually all of which is related to net capital loss carryforwards with no expiry.

Other:
Deferred income tax assets of $42 million, mostly comprised of other foreign subsidiaries operating loss carryforwards expiring between 2019 and 2027.
A valuation allowance of $42 million against the net deferred income tax assets of other foreign subsidiaries, which are not more likely than not to be realized in the future.
Judgments and uncertainties involved in the accounting estimates
At each reporting period, we assess whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized, based on the review of all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimates of future taxable income, past operating results, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The carrying value of our deferred income tax assets reflects our expected ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to utilizerealize these deferred income tax benefits.assets.
Following the assessment of our ability to realize the deferred income tax assets of our U.S. operations, we concluded that existing negative evidence outweighed positive evidence. As a result, we recognizerecognized a full valuation allowance against virtually all of our net U.S. deferred income tax assets. The cumulative losshistorical operating losses of our U.S. operations limited our ability to consider other subjective positive evidence. A valuation allowance does not reduce our underlying tax attributes, nor hinders our ability to use them in the future. If, in the future, sufficient objective positive evidence becomes available such that, based on the weight of available evidence, it is determined to be more likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax assets associated with our U.S. operations can be realized, the valuation allowance will be reduced as appropriate, with the related adjustment being recognized as a decrease to the income tax provision.
The weight of positive evidence for our Canadian operations, which included a review of historical cumulative earnings and our forecasted future earnings, resulted in the conclusion by management that no significant valuation allowances were required for our deferred income tax assets, in Canada, as they were determined to be more likely than not to be realized.
The Company calculates its income tax provision for the period based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based on actual filed income tax returns are recorded when identified.
61

Table of Contents
Tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions are recorded when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority. The amount of tax benefit recognized may differ from the amount taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. These differences represent unrecognized tax benefits and are reviewed at each reporting period based on facts, circumstances and other available evidence. During 2017, previously unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $16 million, almost all of which was due to their remeasurement at the newly enacted lower U.S. federal statutory income tax rate. We have unrecognized tax benefits of $28$28 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. As income tax legislation and regulations are complex and subject to interpretation, our tax positions could be challenged by taxingtax authorities.
Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
Our forecasted future earnings represent important positive evidence in determining the recoverability of our deferred income tax assets. If actual future financial results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used, or if additional significant closure-related costs are recorded in future years, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of our net deferred income tax assets by recording additional valuation allowances, resulting in an income tax expenseprovision that could be material.
We do not expect a significant change to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. However, any adjustments arising from certain ongoing examinations by taxingtax authorities could alter the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions, or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions, and these adjustments could differ from the amount accrued.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Based on available information, we have provisionally estimated the impacts of the TCJA on our 2017 financial results, with the exception of the effects of the newly enacted GILTI regime as a reasonable estimate cannot be determined. The enactment of the TCJA did not have a significant impact on our results of operations in 2017. The final impact of the TCJA may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, the issuance of additional legislative guidance and clarification, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA. We will recognize any adjustments to our provisional amounts in the reporting period the adjustments are determined during the 12-month measurement period following the enactment of the TCJA. Accordingly, we

continue to evaluate its effects on our 2018 financial results. For more information, see Note 15, “Income Taxes,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-lived assets
Description of accounts impacted by the accounting estimates
We have long-lived assets recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet of $1,781$1,564 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. These long-lived assets include fixed assets, net, and amortizable intangible assets, net.net, and operating lease right-of-use assets. In 2017,2020, we recorded depreciation and amortization of $204$169 million and impairment and accelerated depreciation charges aggregating $66of $38 million associated with these long-livedrelated to fixed assets and amortizable intangible assets. The depreciationDepreciation and amortization impairment and accelerated depreciation charges are based on accounting estimates.
The unit of accounting for impairment testing for long-lived assets is its asset group, (seesee Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Impairment of long-lived assets,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements).Statements. The unit of accounting for the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets is at a lower level, either as a group of closely-related assets or at an individual asset level. The cost of a long-lived asset is amortized over its estimated remaining useful life, which is subject to change based on events and circumstances or management’s intention for the use of the asset.
Losses related to the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used are recognized when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable, such as continuing losses in certain businesses. When indicators that the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable are triggered, we evaluate the carrying value of the asset group in relation to its expected undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying value of an asset group is greater than the expected undiscounted future cash flows to be generated by the asset group, an impairment charge is recognized based on the excess of the asset group’s carrying value over its fair value. If it is determined that the carrying value of an asset group is recoverable, we review and adjust, as necessary, the estimated useful lives of the assets in the group.
When an asset group meets the criteria for classification as an asset held for sale, an impairment charge is recognized, if necessary, based on the excess of the asset group’s carrying value over the expected net proceeds from the sale (the estimated fair value minus the estimated costs to sell the asset group).
Our long-lived asset impairment and accelerated depreciation charges are disclosed in Note 4,5, “Closure Costs, Impairment and Other Related Charges,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Judgments and uncertainties involved in the accounting estimates
The calculation of depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets requires us to apply judgment in selecting the remaining useful lives of the assets, which must address both physical and economic considerations. The remaining economic life of a long-lived asset is frequently shorter than its physical life. Estimates of future economic conditions for our long-lived assets and therefore, their remaining useful economic lives, require considerable judgment. The paper industry in recent years has been characterized by considerable uncertainty in business conditions.
Asset impairment for long-lived assets to be held and used is tested at the lowest asset group level having largely independent cash flows. Determining the asset groups for long-lived assets to be held and used requires management’s judgment.
Asset impairment loss calculations require us to apply judgment in estimating asset group fair values and future cash flows, including periods of operation, projections of product pricing, production levels, product costs, market supply and demand, foreign exchange rates, inflation, projected capital spending and, specifically for fixed assets acquired, assigned useful lives, functional obsolescence, asset condition and discount rates. When performing impairment tests, we estimate the fair values of the assets using management’s best assumptions, which we believe would be consistent with the assumptions that a
62

Table of Contents
hypothetical marketplace participant would use. Estimates and assumptions used in these tests are evaluated and updated as appropriate. One key assumption, especially for our long-lived assets in Canada, is the foreign exchange rate, which was determined based on our budgeted exchange rates for 2018. The assessment of whether an asset group should be classified as held for sale requires us to apply judgment in estimating the probable timing of the sale, and in testing for impairment loss, judgment is required in estimating the net proceeds from the sale.
As a result of operating income observed, the Company performed an impairment test as of November 30, 2020, on one of its long-lived asset groups. The Company performed a Step 1 test which compares the carrying values of the asset group to its estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the asset group by a substantial margin, so no impairment was recognized.
Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
If our estimate of the remaining useful life changes, such a change is accounted for prospectively in our determination of depreciation and amortization. Actual depreciation and amortization charges for an individual asset may therefore be significantly accelerated if the outlook for its remaining useful life is shortened considerably.

A number of judgments were made in the determination of our asset groups. If a different conclusion had been reached for any one of those judgments, it could have resulted in the identification of asset groups different from those we actually identified, and consequently, could result in a different conclusion when comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows or the fair value to the carrying value of the asset group.
Actual asset impairment losses could vary considerably from estimated impairment losses if actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values. Assets of facilities that are idled have a greater risk of acceleration in depreciation and amortization or additional impairment.
GoodwillBusiness Combination
Description of accounts impacted by the accounting estimates
AsOn February 1, 2020, we acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. the U.S. Sawmill Business, which produces construction-grade dimensional lumber and decking products from locally sourced southern yellow pine for distribution within the U.S.
At Acquisition Date, we recognized fixed assets of December 31, 2017,$114 million, amortizable intangible assets of $21 million, goodwill of $31 million and other assets, net of other liabilities, of $7 million.
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method as of the date control is transferred to us. Under this approach, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. Any amount of the purchase price paid that is in excess of the estimated fair values of net identifiable assets acquired is recorded in “Goodwill” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet included goodwillSheets. In determining the estimated fair values of $81 million, all ofidentifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various recognized valuation methods such as income, cost and market approaches. We utilized both the cost and market approaches to value fixed assets, which is assignedconsider external transactions and other comparable transactions, estimated replacement and reproduction costs, and estimated useful lives and consideration for physical, functional and economic obsolescence. We utilized the income approach to our tissue segment forvalue intangible assets, which considers the purpose of impairment testing.
We review the carryingpresent value of our goodwill for impairment annually as of November 30, or more frequently, whenever indicators of potential impairment exist. As more fully discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Goodwill,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, in the event that the net carrying amount ofcash flows expected to be generated by the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge will be recognized for the amountintangible assets, and excluding cash flows related to contributory assets. Valuations are performed by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill in that reporting unit.management or independent valuation specialists under management’s supervision, where appropriate.
Judgments and uncertainties involved in the accounting estimates
We test goodwill for impairment atThe judgments made in determining the reporting unit level. Determining which reporting units’ goodwill should beestimated fair value assigned to requires considerable judgment. A reporting unit is a component of an operating segment, or a combination of components of an operating segment that share similar economic characteristics. Based on our analysis of the components of our tissue segment, we concluded that all significant components of the tissue segment should be combined into a single reporting unit. Goodwill was entirely assigned to this reporting unit, which includes the netlong-lived assets of our Atlas Tissue manufacturing facilities in Hialeahacquired and Sanford, both located in Florida,goodwill, as well as our Calhoun tissue facility.the estimated useful life of the long-lived assets, could impact the net income of the periods subsequent to the acquisition through depreciation and amortization, and in certain instances through impairment charges, if the asset becomes impaired in the future.
When performing our goodwill impairment test,At Acquisition Date, we estimateidentified amortizable intangible assets primarily related to customer relationships. In determining the estimated fair value offor intangible assets, we used the reporting unit usingincome approach through a discounted cash flow model, and we validatemulti-period excess earning method. Estimates that are sensitive to the resulting fair value with a valuation technique based on multiples of earnings for comparable industry participants. The determination of the fair value involves many assumptionsof acquired customer intangibles include revenue stream and judgments, including: projectioneconomic life of sales volumeeach customer relationship, growth or attrition of the existing customers, forecasted revenues and pricing; projected levels of revenue growth and market penetration; product costs; inflation; projected capital spending; change in working capital; economic, industry and market conditions;operating expenses, contributory asset charges and discount rate.rates, all of which can have a material impact on the estimated fair values of customer relationship intangible assets.
The estimates used
63

Table of Contents
Other significant judgments include the estimated fair value of fixed assets. We utilized both the cost and the market approaches in the estimation of fair value of fixed assets. Estimates that are consistent with our internal projectionssensitive to the determination of the fair value of fixed assets include external transactions and operating plans, which weother comparable transactions, estimated replacement and reproduction costs, and estimated useful lives and consideration for physical, functional and economic obsolescence.
We believe would be consistent with whatthat the estimated fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions that a hypothetical marketplace participant would use. The discount rate assumption is based onWhile we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the weighted-average cost of capital of comparable industry participants, adjustedacquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to consider the risks associated with the start-up of the Calhoun tissue facility and underlying risk associated with meeting projected levels of revenue growth and margin.
We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then an impairment test is performed.
Due to lower than expected financial results from Atlas Tissue in 2017 and the development phase of the Calhoun tissue facility, we elected to bypass the optional qualitative assessment of the tissue reporting unit for our 2017 annual goodwill impairment test.refinement.
Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
A number of judgments were made inDuring the measurement period, we have recorded adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Final determination of the reporting unit. If a different conclusion hadestimated fair values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed has been reached forcompleted and as such, any onesubsequent adjustments would be recorded in our Consolidated Statements of those judgments, it could have resultedComprehensive (loss) income.
SUPPLEMENTAL OBLIGOR GROUP INFORMATION
The following information is presented in a different reporting unit identification fromaccordance with Rule 13-01 of Regulation S-X adopted in 2020, and the one we identified, and consequently, could result in a different conclusion when comparing the fair valuepublic information requirements of Rule 144 promulgated pursuant to the carryingSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection to the 2023 Notes issued by Resolute Forest Products Inc. (or, the “Issuer”) and fully guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries that guarantee the ABL Credit Facility as further defined below (or, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) (together, the “Obligor Group”). The 2023 Notes are not guaranteed by our foreign subsidiaries (or, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The 2023 Notes were redeemed subsequent to December 31, 2020, and are no longer outstanding, see Note 23, “Subsequent Events,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following summarized financial information of the Obligor Group is presented on a combined basis, with all intercompany transactions between the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries eliminated and excluding any earnings from and investments in the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. Financial information of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries is not included.
Summarized financial information for the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows:
(In millions)
Sales (1)
$2,542
Operating loss$(116)
Net loss$(126)
(1)Includes $41 million of sales to the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.
Summarized financial information as of December 31, 2020 was as follows:
(In millions)
Total current assets$448
Total long-term assets$958
Total current liabilities (1)
$800
Total long-term liabilities$969
(1)Includes accounts payable to the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries of $676 million.
The 2023 Notes are unsecured and effectively junior to indebtedness under each of the ABL Credit Facility,the Senior Secured Credit Facility, and the Loan Facility, to the extent of the value of the reporting unit.
Our goodwill impairment test forcollateral securing each indebtedness and to future secured indebtedness. In addition, the tissue reporting unit as2023 Notes are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of November 30, 2017, concluded thatour Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, including the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount by approximately 20%. As a result, no impairment was recognized.

The actual fair value of the reporting unit could vary considerably from the estimated fair value if actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in estimating future cash flows and the reporting unit fair value. For example, a 1% change in any one of these assumptions, assuming that all other assumptions remain constant, would have increased (decreased) the fair value of the reporting unit as of November 30, 2017, as follows:Loan Facility.
64
(In millions)1% Increase1% Decrease
Assumption:      
Sales pricing$64
 $(64) 
Product costs (40)  38
 
Discount rate (13)  14
 

Table of Contents
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, prices for the products we manufacture, commodity prices, and credit risk on accounts receivable from our customers.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We compete with producers from around the world, particularly North America, Europe, and South America, in most of our product lines, with the exception of wood products and tissue, where we compete primarily with other North American producers. We sell our products mainly in transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, but we also sell in certain local currencies, including the Canadian dollar, the euro, and the pound sterling. Changes in the relative strength or weakness of these currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, could affect international trade flows in these products. A stronger U.S. dollar might attract imports, thereby increasing product supply and possibly creating downward pressure on prices. On the other hand, a weaker U.S. dollar might encourage U.S. exports but also increase manufacturing costs in Canadian dollars or other foreign currencies.dollars.
Variations in exchange rates could also significantly affect our competitive position. In 2017, for example, the strength of the U.S. dollar against certain European currencies and the currencies of other paper producing countries, in addition to the weak currencies in a number of paper importing countries, continued to negatively affect the competitive position of North American newsprint producers selling in certain U.S. dollar-denominated international newsprint markets, such as Asia and Latin America. Some of our European competitors were able to price products more aggressively in those markets as a result of the relative weakness of their local currency, which negatively affected our ability to compete.
We are particularly sensitive to changes in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar. The actual impact of these changes depends primarily on the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion of our financial assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, and the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the exchange rate. We expect exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact costs and revenues, but we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of this effect for any period, and there can be no assurance of any future effects. In 20162019 and 2017,2020, the Canadian dollar fluctuated between a low of US$0.691.27 in JanuaryDecember of 20162020 and a high of US$0.831.45 in SeptemberMarch of 2017.2020. Based on operating projections for 2018,2021, if the Canadian dollar strengthens by one cent against the U.S. dollar, we expect that it will decrease our annual operating income by approximately $17$16 million, and vice versa.
Furthermore, certain monetary assets and liabilities, including a substantial portion of our net pension and OPEB obligations and our net deferred income tax assets, are denominated in Canadian dollars. As a result, our earnings can be subject to the potentially significant effect of foreign exchange gains or losses in respect of these Canadian dollar net monetary items. A fluctuation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar in any given period would generally cause a foreign exchange gain or loss.
Product Price Risk
Historically, economic and market shifts, fluctuations in capacity, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created cyclical changes in prices, sales volume and margins for our products. In general, our products, other than tissue, are commodities that are widely available from other producers; because these products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand. The overall levels of demand for the products we manufacture, and consequently our sales and profitability, reflect fluctuations in end user demand. The demand for some of our products has weakened significantly over the past decade. For example, over the 10 years ended December 31, 2017,2020, according to industry statistics, North American newsprint demand fell by 65%69%. This trend, which similarly affects our specialty papers, couldpaper, is expected to continue as a result of developments in non-print media, lower North American

newspaper circulation, weaker paper-based advertising, grade substitution and conservation measures taken by publishers and retailers. Without change in capacity, the lower demand in relation to supply can cause downward pressure on price.
In the table below, we show the impact of a $25 change to the average transaction price per unit of our products, other than tissue, based on our operating configuration as of December 31, 2017.2020. This presentation measures only the impact of pricing and items directly related to price, and assumes that every other factor is held constant.
PRODUCTPRODUCTUnitProjected change in annualized EBITDAoperating income ($ millions) based on $25
$25
change in price per unit
Market pulp$ / metric ton3829 
Wood products$ / thousand board feet48
PaperNewsprint$ / metric ton3738 
Specialty papers$ / short ton30

65

Table of Contents
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase significant amounts of wood fiber, recovered paper, chemicals, and energy to supply our manufacturing facilities. These raw materials are market-priced commodities and as such, are subject to fluctuations in prices. Increases in the prices of these commodities will tend to reduce our reported earnings and decreases will tend to increase our reported earnings. From time to time, we may enter into contracts aimed at securing a stable source of supply for these commodities. These contracts typically require us to pay the market price at the time of purchase. Thus, under these contracts, we generally remain subject to market fluctuations in commodity prices.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from our customers. In order to manage our credit risk, we have adopted policies, which include the analysis of the financial position of our customers and the regular review of their credit limits. The credit limits are dynamically reviewed based on fluctuations in the customers’ financial results and payment behavior. These customer credit limits are critical inputs in determining the conditions under which credit is extended to customers to reduce exposure to losses. We also subscribe to credit insurance and, in some cases, require bank letters of credit. Our customers are mainly in the business of newspaper publishing, advertising, printing, paper converting, consumer products, as well as lumber wholesale and retail.

66

Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Financial Statements
 
Page


67

Table of Contents
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2017  2016  2015  202020192018
Sales$3,513
 $3,545
 $3,645
 Sales$2,800 $2,923 $3,756 
Costs and expenses:       Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs 2,574
 2,716
 2,826
 Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs2,010 2,198 2,549 
Depreciation and amortization 204
 206
 237
 Depreciation and amortization169 167 212 
Distribution costs 442
 440
 460
 Distribution costs344 389 475 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 172
 149
 160
 Selling, general and administrative expenses136 136 165 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 87
 62
 181
 Closure costs, impairment and other related charges53 18 121 
Net gain on disposition of assets (15) (2) 
 Net gain on disposition of assets(11)(2)(145)
Operating income (loss) 49
 (26) (219) 
Operating incomeOperating income99 17 379 
Interest expense (49) (38) (41) Interest expense(34)(31)(47)
Other income, net 6
 7
 4
 
Income (loss) before income taxes 6
 (57) (256) 
Income tax (provision) benefit (84) (19) 1
 
Net loss including noncontrolling interests (78) (76) (255) 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (6) (5) (2) 
Net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(84) $(81) $(257) 
Net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:       
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit creditsNon-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits0 47 50 
Other (expense) income, netOther (expense) income, net(4)(22)
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes61 11 387 
Income tax provisionIncome tax provision(51)(58)(152)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interestNet income (loss) including noncontrolling interest10 (47)235 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interestNet income attributable to noncontrolling interest0 
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$10 $(47)$235 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:Net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:
Basic$(0.93) $(0.90) $(2.78) Basic$0.12 $(0.51)$2.57 
Diluted (0.93) 
(0.90) 
(2.78) Diluted$0.12 $(0.51)$2.52 
Weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding:       Weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding:
Basic 90.5
 89.9
 92.4
 Basic86.1 91.4 91.3 
Diluted 90.5
 89.9
 92.4
 Diluted86.4 91.4 93.3 
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

68

Table of Contents
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(LOSS) INCOME
(In millions)millions of U.S. dollars)
 
  Years Ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(78) $(76) $(255) 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:         
Unamortized prior service credits         
Change in unamortized prior service credits (15)  (17)  (16) 
Income tax benefit 
  
  6
 
Change in unamortized prior service credits, net of tax (15)  (17)  (10) 
Unamortized actuarial losses         
Change in unamortized actuarial losses (10)  (183)  208
 
Income tax benefit (provision) 3
  31
  (63) 
Change in unamortized actuarial losses, net of tax (7)  (152)  145
 
Foreign currency translation (3)  1
  (4) 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (25)  (168)  131
 
Comprehensive loss including noncontrolling interests (103)  (244)  (124) 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (6)  (5)  (2) 
Comprehensive loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(109) $(249) $(126) 
Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest$10 $(47)$235 
Other comprehensive loss:
Unamortized prior service costs
Change in unamortized prior service costs(17)(12)(25)
Income tax benefit0 
Change in unamortized prior service costs, net of tax(17)(12)(24)
Unamortized actuarial losses
Change in unamortized actuarial losses(156)(273)(194)
Income tax benefit38 55 51 
Change in unamortized actuarial losses, net of tax(118)(218)(143)
Foreign currency translation0 (1)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(135)(229)(168)
Comprehensive (loss) income including noncontrolling interest(125)(276)67 
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest0 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(125)$(276)$67 
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

69

Table of Contents
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amount)
 December 31,
2017
December 31,
2016
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$6
 $35
 
Accounts receivable, net:      
Trade 399
  358
 
Other 80
  83
 
Inventories, net 526
  570
 
Other current assets 33
  35
 
Total current assets 1,044
  1,081
 
Fixed assets, net 1,716
  1,842
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net 65
  70
 
Goodwill 81
  81
 
Deferred income tax assets 1,076
  1,039
 
Other assets 165
  164
 
Total assets$4,147
 $4,277
 
       
Liabilities and equity      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$420
 $466
 
Current portion of long-term debt 1
  1
 
Total current liabilities 421
  467
 
Long-term debt, net of current portion 788
  761
 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations 1,257
  1,281
 
Deferred income tax liabilities 13
  2
 
Other liabilities 68
  55
 
Total liabilities 2,547
  2,566
 
Commitments and contingencies 
  
 
Equity:      
Resolute Forest Products Inc. shareholders’ equity:      
Common stock, $0.001 par value. 118.2 shares issued and 90.2 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017; 117.8 shares issued and 89.8 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016 
  
 
Additional paid-in capital 3,793
  3,775
 
Deficit (1,294)  (1,207) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (780)  (755) 
Treasury stock at cost, 28.0 shares as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (120)  (120) 
Total Resolute Forest Products Inc. shareholders’ equity 1,599
  1,693
 
Noncontrolling interests 1
  18
 
Total equity 1,600
  1,711
 
Total liabilities and equity$4,147
 $4,277
 
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$113 $
Accounts receivable, net:
Trade230 273 
Other48 76 
Inventories, net462 522 
Other current assets47 33 
Total current assets900 907 
Fixed assets, net1,441 1,459 
Amortizable intangible assets, net63 48 
Goodwill31 
Deferred income tax assets915 915 
Operating lease right-of-use assets60 61 
Other assets320 236 
Total assets$3,730 $3,626 
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$369 $342 
Current portion of long-term debt2 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities9 
Total current liabilities380 351 
Long-term debt, net of current portion559 448 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations1,562 1,460 
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion55 57 
Other liabilities92 75 
Total liabilities2,648 2,391 
Commitments and contingencies00
Equity:
Resolute Forest Products Inc. shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value. 120.6 million shares issued and 80.8 million shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020; 119.5 million shares issued and 86.7 million shares outstanding as of December 31, 20190 
Additional paid-in capital3,804 3,802 
Deficit(1,235)(1,245)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,314)(1,179)
Treasury stock at cost, 39.8 million shares and 32.8 million shares as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(174)(144)
Total Resolute Forest Products Inc. shareholders’ equity1,081 1,234 
Noncontrolling interest1 
Total equity1,082 1,235 
Total liabilities and equity$3,730 $3,626 
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

70

Table of Contents
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In millions)millions of U.S. dollars)


 Resolute Forest Products Inc. Shareholders’ Equity      
 Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
DeficitAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossTreasury
Stock
Non-
controlling
Interests
Total Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2014$
 $3,754
 $(869) $(718) $(61) $11
 $2,117
 
Share-based compensation costs for equity-classified awards 
  11
  
  
  
  
  11
 
Net (loss) income 
  
  (257)  
  
  2
  (255) 
Purchases of treasury stock (5.5 shares) (Note 17) 
  
  
  
  (59)  
  (59) 
Stock options exercised and stock unit awards vested (0.2 shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 
  
  
  131
  
  
  131
 
Balance as of December 31, 2015 
  3,765
  (1,126)  (587)  (120)  13
  1,945
 
Share-based compensation costs for equity-classified awards 
  10
  
  
  
  
  10
 
Net (loss) income 
  
  (81)  
  
  5
  (76) 
Stock unit awards vested (0.3 shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 
  
  
  (168)  
  
  (168) 
Balance as of December 31, 2016 
  3,775
  (1,207)  (755)  (120)  18
  1,711
 
Share-based compensation costs for equity-classified awards 
  10
  
  
  
  
  10
 
Net (loss) income 
  
  (84)  
  
  6
  (78) 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest (Note 1) 
  8
  
  
  
  (23)  (15) 
Cumulative-effect adjustment upon deferred tax charge elimination (Note 15) 
  
  (3)  
  
  
  (3) 
Stock unit awards vested (0.4 shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 
  
  
  (25)  
  
  (25) 
Balance as of December 31, 2017$
 $3,793
 $(1,294) $(780) $(120) $1
 $1,600
 
Resolute Forest Products Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
DeficitAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossTreasury
Stock
Non-
controlling
Interests
Total Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2017$$3,793 $(1,294)$(780)$(120)$$1,600 
Share-based compensation, net of withholding taxes— — — — — 
Net income— — 235 — — — 235 
Special dividend— (141)— — — (138)
Reclassification of stranded income tax— — (2)— — 
Stock unit awards vested (0.6 million shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes (Note 20)— — — — — — — 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — (168)— — (168)
Balance as of December 31, 20183,802 (1,198)(950)(120)1,535 
Net loss— — (47)— — — (47)
Purchase of treasury stock (4.8 million shares) (Note 19)— — — — (24)— (24)
Stock unit awards vested (0.7 million shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes (Note 20)— — — — — — — 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — (229)— — (229)
Balance as of December 31, 20193,802 (1,245)(1,179)(144)1,235 
Share-based compensation, net of withholding taxes— — — — — 
Net income— 10 — — — 10 
Purchases of treasury stock (6.9 million shares) (Note 19)— — — — (30)— (30)
Stock unit awards vested (1.0 million shares), net of shares forfeited for employee withholding taxes (Note 20)— — — — — — — 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — (135)— — (135)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$0 $3,804 $(1,235)$(1,314)$(174)$1 $1,082 
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

71

Table of Contents
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)millions of U.S. dollars)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2017  2016  2015  202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:       Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss including noncontrolling interests$(78) $(76) $(255) 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:       
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interestNet income (loss) including noncontrolling interest$10 $(47)$235 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest to net cash provided by operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest to net cash provided by operating activities:
Share-based compensation 15
 11
 12
 Share-based compensation5 12 
Depreciation and amortization 204
 206
 237
 Depreciation and amortization169 167 212 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 71
 59
 176
 Closure costs, impairment and other related charges39 120 
Inventory write-downs related to closures 24
 7
 2
 Inventory write-downs related to closures25 13 (1)
Deferred income taxes 80
 14
 3
 Deferred income taxes51 58 164 
Net pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments (114) (125) (62) Net pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments(87)(125)(144)
Net gain on disposition of assets (15) (2) 
 Net gain on disposition of assets(11)(2)(145)
(Gain) loss on translation of foreign currency denominated deferred income taxes (71) (28) 199
 (Gain) loss on translation of foreign currency denominated deferred income taxes(15)(42)75 
Loss (gain) on translation of foreign currency denominated pension and other postretirement benefit obligations 58
 27
 (184) Loss (gain) on translation of foreign currency denominated pension and other postretirement benefit obligations17 43 (63)
Gain on disposition of equity method investment 
 (5) 
 
Net planned major maintenance amortization (payments) 3
 (3) (3) Net planned major maintenance amortization (payments)6 13 (20)
Changes in working capital:       Changes in working capital:
Accounts receivable (37) 26
 87
 Accounts receivable80 88 (19)
Inventories 23
 (37) 10
 Inventories44 (27)(46)
Other current assets 1
 7
 (4) Other current assets(12)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (17) (3) (85) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities16 (82)38 
Other, net 11
 3
 5
 Other, net(3)16 16 
Net cash provided by operating activities 158
 81
 138
 Net cash provided by operating activities334 85 435 
Cash flows from investing activities:       Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash invested in fixed assets (164) (249) (185) Cash invested in fixed assets(78)(113)(155)
Acquisition of Atlas Paper Holdings, Inc., including cash overdraft acquired 
 
 (159) 
Acquisition of a sawmill in Senneterre (Quebec) 
 (6) 
 
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquiredAcquisition of business, net of cash acquired(172)
Disposition of assets 21
 5
 
 Disposition of assets14 336 
Increase in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper (22) (23) (4) 
Decrease in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper, netDecrease in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper, net0 48 
Increase in countervailing and anti-dumping duty cash deposits on softwood lumber (26) 
 
 Increase in countervailing and anti-dumping duty cash deposits on softwood lumber(81)(59)(77)
Increase in restricted cash, net (3) 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in deposit requirements for letters of credit, net 2
 
 (4) 
Net cash used in investing activities (192) (273) (352) 
Decrease (increase) in countervailing duty cash deposits on uncoated groundwood paperDecrease (increase) in countervailing duty cash deposits on uncoated groundwood paper0 (6)
Proceeds from insurance settlementProceeds from insurance settlement15 
Other investing activities, netOther investing activities, net5 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activitiesNet cash (used in) provided by investing activities(297)(162)146 
Cash flows from financing activities:       Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings under revolving credit facilities 19
 125
 
 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in Donohue Malbaie Inc. (15) 
 
 
Issuance of long-term debt 
 46
 
 
Payments of debt (1) (1) 
 
Net (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit facilitiesNet (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit facilities(71)71 (144)
Payment of special dividendPayment of special dividend0 (136)
Proceeds from long-term debtProceeds from long-term debt180 
Repayments of debtRepayments of debt(1)(271)
Purchases of treasury stockPurchases of treasury stock(30)(24)
Payments of financing and credit facility fees 
 (1) (3) Payments of financing and credit facility fees0 (4)(1)
Purchases of treasury stock 
 
 (59) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 3
 169
 (62) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities78 (228)(281)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2
 
 (3) 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (29) (23) (279) 
Cash and cash equivalents:       
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cashEffect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash2 (4)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cashNet increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash$117 $(303)$296 
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash:Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash:
Beginning of year 35
 58
 337
 Beginning of year$42 $345 $49 
End of year$6
 $35
 $58
 End of year$159 $42 $345 
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash at year end:Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash at year end:
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents$113 $$304 
Restricted cash (included in “Other current assets”)Restricted cash (included in “Other current assets”)$4 $$
Restricted cash (included in “Other assets”)Restricted cash (included in “Other assets”)$42 $39 $41 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:       Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:       
Interest, including capitalized interest of $1, $7 and $5 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively$47
 $40
 $40
 
Cash paid (received) during the year for:Cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest, including capitalized interest of $1, $0 and $1 in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectivelyInterest, including capitalized interest of $1, $0 and $1 in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively$32 $26 $40 
Income taxes 7
 3
 3
 Income taxes$(1)$(11)$(1)
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

72

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements





Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Nature of operations
Resolute Forest Products Inc. (with its subsidiaries, and affiliates, either individually or collectively, unless otherwise indicated, referred to as “Resolute Forest Products,” “we,” “our,” “us,” “Parent”“Parent,” or the “Company”) is incorporated in Delaware. We are a global leader in the forest products industry with a diverse range of products, including market pulp, tissue, wood products, newsprint and specialty papers,paper, which are marketed in close to 70over 50 countries. We own or operate some 40 manufacturing facilities, as well as power generation assets, in the United StatesU.S. and Canada.
Financial statements
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes (“(or, the “Consolidated Financial Statements”Statements) in accordance with United StatesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”(or, “GAAP). All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Certain prior period amounts in the accompanying notes to our footnotesConsolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the 20172020 presentation.
Consolidation
Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Resolute Forest Products Inc. and its controlled subsidiaries. All transactions and balances between these companies have been eliminated. All consolidated subsidiaries are wholly-owned as of December 31, 2017,2020, with the exception of the following:
Consolidated SubsidiaryResolute Forest Products OwnershipPartnerPartner
Ownership
Forest Products Mauricie L.P.93.2%Coopérative Forestière du Haut Saint-Maurice6.8%
In 2017, we acquired the 49% equity interest held by The New York Times Company in Donohue Malbaie Inc. for a cash purchase price of $15 million. We already owned 51% of the shares of Donohue Malbaie Inc. This acquisition was accounted for as an equity transaction and resulted in an increase of $8 million to “Additional paid-in capital” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Equity method investments
We account for our investments in affiliated companies where we have significant influence but notor joint control, over their operations, using the equity method of accounting.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of estimates
In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make accounting estimates based on assumptions, judgments, and projections of future results of operations and cash flows. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. The most critical estimates relate to the assumptions underlying the benefit obligations of our pension and other postretirement benefit (“OPEB”(or, “OPEB) plans, the recoverability of deferred income tax assets, and the carrying values of our long-lived assets, and the fair value estimates of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, including goodwill. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on a number of factors, including historical experience, recent events, existing conditions, internal budgets and forecasts, projections obtained from industry research firms, and other data that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The uncertainties around the novel coronavirus (or, “COVID-19”) pandemic required the use of judgments and estimates that resulted in no significant impacts to our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, except as disclosed in Note 5, “Closure Costs, Impairment and Other Related Charges” and Note 9, “Inventories, Net.” The future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could generate, in future reporting periods, a significant risk of material adjustment to the carrying amounts of deferred income tax assets and long-lived assets.
73

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Business combination
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method as of the date control is transferred to us. Under this approach, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. Any amount of the purchase price paid that is in excess of the estimated fair values of net identifiable assets acquired is recorded in “Goodwill” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In determining the estimated fair values of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various recognized valuation methods such as present value modeling and referenced market values (where available). Valuations are performed by management or independent valuation specialists under management`s supervision, where appropriate. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of direct obligations of the U.S. and Canadian governments and their agencies, demand deposits, and other short-term, highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase.

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Restricted cash consists primarily of deposits held as collateral for letters of credit.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at cost, net of an allowance for doubtful accountsexpected credit losses.
Accounts receivable are subject to impairment review that is based on the aging method. Impairment is calculated based on how long a receivable has been outstanding. The Company estimates expected collectibility,credit losses by considering historical credit loss experience (based on days past due), current conditions, and such carrying value approximates fair value.forward-looking factors specific to the customers and the economic environment.
We also consider if we are no longer doing business with the customer, and any other factors that may affect collectability from customers with significant outstanding balances. A receivable is written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovering the contractual cash flows.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the average cost method. Cost includes labor, materials and production overhead, which is based on the normal capacity of our production facilities. Unallocated overhead, including production overhead associated with abnormal production levels, is recognized in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations when incurred.
Assets held for sale
Assets held for sale are carried in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. We cease recording depreciation and amortization when assets are classified as held for sale.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets acquired, including internal-use software, are stated at acquisition cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. The cost of the fixed assets is reduced by any investment tax credits or government capital grants earned. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We capitalize interest on borrowings during the construction period of major capital projects as part of the related asset and amortize the capitalized interest in “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations over the related asset’s remaining useful life. Planned major maintenance costs are recorded using the deferral method, whereby the costs of each planned major maintenance activity are capitalized to “Other current assets” or “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and amortized to “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the estimated period until the next planned major maintenance activity. All other routine repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Environmental costs
74

Table of Contents
We expense environmental costs related
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. These costs are included in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Financial Statements of Operations. Expenditures that extend the life of the related property are capitalized. We determine our liability on a site-by-site basis and record a liability at the time it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value when the amount and timing of expected cash payments are reliably determinable.

Amortizable intangible assets
Amortizable intangible assets are stated at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization.amortization and impairment. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Impairment of long-lived assets
The unit of accounting for impairment testing for long-lived assets is its group, which includes fixed assets, net, amortizable intangible assets, net, and operating lease right-of-use assets (collectively, “long-lived assets”) is its group, which includes long-lived assets and liabilities directly related to those assets (herein defined as “asset group”asset group). For asset groups that are held and used, that group represents the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other asset groups. For asset groups that are to be disposed of by sale or otherwise, that group represents assets to be disposed of together as a group in a single transaction and liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the transaction.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset group may no longer be recoverable. The recoverability of an asset group that is held and used is tested by comparing the carrying value of the asset group to the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by that asset group. In estimating the undiscounted future cash flows, we use projections of cash flows directly associated with, and which are expected to arise as a direct result of, the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. If there are multiple plausible scenarios for the use and eventual disposition of an asset group, we assess the likelihood of each scenario occurring in order to determine a probability-weighted estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows. The principal assumptions include periods of operation, projections of product pricing, production levels and sales volumes, product costs, market supply and demand, foreign exchange rates, inflation, and projected capital spending. Changes in any of these assumptions could have a material effect on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount that the asset group’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. The fair value of a long-lived asset group is determined in accordance with our accounting policy for fair

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


value measurements, as discussed below. If it is determined that the carrying value of an asset group is recoverable, we review and adjust, as necessary, the estimated useful lives of the assets in the group.
When an asset group meets the criteria for classification as an asset held for sale, an impairment charge is recognized, if necessary, based on the excess of the asset group’s carrying value over the expected net proceeds from the sale (the estimated fair value minus the estimated costs to sell).
Asset groupsLong-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale are classified as held and used until the asset group is disposed of or use of the asset group has ceased.
Business combination
We use the acquisition method in accounting for a business combination. Under this approach, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair market values at the date of acquisition. Any amount of the purchase price paid that is in excess of the estimated fair values of net identifiable assets acquired is recorded in “Goodwill” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In determining the estimated fair values of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various recognized valuation methods such as present value modeling and referenced market values (where available). Valuations are performed by management or independent valuation specialists under management’s supervision, where appropriate. Transaction costs, as well as costs to integrate acquired companies, are expensed as incurred in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized and is evaluatedtested for impairment every year at the end of November, or more frequently whenever indicators ofif events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment exist.loss. The impairment test of goodwill is performed at the reporting unit’s level.
We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount including goodwill. In performing the qualitative assessment, we identify the relevant drivers of fair value of a reporting unit and the relevant events and circumstances that may have an impact on those drivers of fair value. This process involves significant judgment and assumptions including the assessment of the results of the most recent fair value calculations, the identification of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, specific events affecting us and the business, and making the assessment on whether each relevant factor will impact the impairment test positively or negatively, and the magnitude of any such impact. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determinequalitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then ana quantitative impairment test is performed. We can also elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.
The first step of anquantitative impairment test is to compareconsists of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Significant judgment is required to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit.
Using the income method toWe determine the fair value of a reporting unit by using the income method. Under this method, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The assumptions used in the model requires estimating future sales volumes, selling prices and costs, changes in working capital, investments in fixed assets, and the selection of the appropriate discount rate. The assumptions used are consistent with internal projections and operating plans. Unanticipated market and macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur and could affect the exactitude and validity of management assumptions and estimates. Sensitivities of these fair value estimates to changes in assumptions are also performed.
75

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

In the event that the net carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying valueamount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill in that reporting unit.
Goodwill is assigned to the tissuewood segment for the purposes of impairment testing.
We elected the optional qualitative assessment for our 2020 annual goodwill impairment test. We concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. As a result, no impairment was recognized.
Leases
We engage in short and long-term leases for building, machinery, chemical equipment, rail cars and office equipment. We determine if a contract contains a lease at inception. Leases are classified as either operating leases or finance leases. Operating leases are included in “Operating lease right-of-use assets,” “Current portion of operating lease liabilities,” and “Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion,” whereas finance leases are included in “Fixed assets, net,” “Current portion of long-term debt,” and “Long-term debt, net of current portion” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are not recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and are expensed over the term of the lease in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Operating and finance lease right-of-use assets and the related liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term. Renewal and termination options are included in our lease terms when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised. In determining the present value of lease payments, we use the implicit rate when readily determinable, or our estimated incremental borrowing rate, which is based on information available at the lease commencement date. Lease payments are expensed in our Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
For buildings, we account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. For all other contracts, we account for the lease and non-lease components separately.
Income taxes
We use the asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts in our Consolidated Financial Statements of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. This approach also requires the recording of deferred income tax assets related to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applicable when temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled.
We doaccount for global intangible low-taxed income (or, “GILTI”) as a period cost, if and when incurred, and apply the tax law ordering approach to assess the impact of GILTI on the realizability of net operating loss carryforwards.
We have not provideprovided for the additional U.S. and foreign income taxes that wouldcould become

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


payable upon remittance of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we are evaluatinghave specific plans for the reinvestment of such earnings for the provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”).earnings.
Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realization, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimates of future taxable income, past operating results, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
Tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions are recorded when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities. The amount of tax benefit recognized may differ from the amount taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. These differences represent unrecognized tax benefits and are reviewed at each reporting period based on facts, circumstances and available evidence. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax expense.provision.
A policy election as
76

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to whetherConsolidated Financial Statements

Environmental costs
We expense environmental costs related to recognizeexisting conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. These costs are included in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Expenditures that extend the newly enacted global intangible low-taxed income tax (“GILTI”) as a period cost or to recognize deferred taxes for its future effects will be made during the 12-month measurement period following the enactmentlife of the TCJA,related property are capitalized. We determine our liability on a site-by-site basis and record a liability at the time it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Such accruals are adjusted as further discussed in Note 15, “Income Taxes.”information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value when the amount and timing of expected cash payments are reliably determinable.
Pension and OPEB plans
For oureach defined benefit plans, we recognize a liability or an asset for pension and OPEB obligationsplan, a liability is recognized for a plan’s under-funded status, net of the fair value of plan assets. A liability is recognized for a plan’s under-funded statusassets, and an asset is recognized for a plan’s over-funded status.status, net of the plan’s obligations. Changes in the funding status that have not been recognized in our net periodic benefit cost are reflected as an adjustment to our “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize net periodic benefit cost or credit as employees render the services necessary to earn the pension and OPEB. The service cost component of net periodic pension and OPEB cost or credit is recorded in operating expenses (together with other employee compensation costs arising during the period). The other components of the net periodic pension and OPEB cost or credit (or, “non-operating pension and OPEB credits”) are reported separately outside any subtotal of operating income. Amounts we contribute to our defined contribution plans are expensed as incurred.
Fair value measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, and is based on any principal market for the specific asset or liability. We consider the risk of non-performance of the obligor, which in some cases reflects our own credit risk, in determining fair value. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB���) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” weWe categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value (other than those measured at net asset value, (“NAV”)or “NAV,” per share, or its equivalent) into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. This fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 -Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 -Valuations based on observable inputs, other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted interest or currency exchange rates.
Level 3 -Valuations based on significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, such as discounted cash flow methodologies based on internal cash flow forecasts.
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used in the determination of fair value of our assets and liabilities, when required, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
Share-based compensation
We recognize the cost of our share-based compensation over the requisite service period using the straight-line attribution approach, based on the grant date fair value for equity-based awards, and based on the quoted marketfair value at the end of each reporting period for liability-based awards. The requisite service period is reduced for those employees who are retirement eligible at the date of the grant or who will become retirement eligible during the vesting period and who will be entitled to continue vesting in their entire award upon retirement.
Our stock incentive awards (as defined in Note 20, “Share-Based Compensation”) may be subject to market, performance and/or service conditions. For equity-based awards, the fair value of stock options is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing formula, and the fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”(or, “RSUs), deferred stock units (“DSUs”(or, “DSUs) and performance stock units (“PSUs”(or, “PSUs) is determined based on the market price of a share of our common stock on the grant date. Liability-based awards, consisting of RSUs, DSUs, and PSUs, are initially measured based on the market price of a share of our common stock on the grant date and remeasured at the end of each reporting period, until settlement. We estimate forfeituresCertain PSUs have a market condition considered in the determination of stock incentive awards (as defined in Note 18, “Share-Based Compensation”) and performancethe fair value of the award, such that the ultimate number of units that vest will be

77

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



determined in part by total shareholder return relative to a group of peer companies. The fair value of those PSUs is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
We estimate forfeitures of stock incentive awards and performance adjustments for our PSUs based on historical experience and forecasts, and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. Estimated forfeitures and performance adjustments are updated to reflect new information or actual experience, as it becomes available.
Revenue recognition
Revenue arises from contracts with customers in which the sale of goods is the main performance obligation. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when or as the performance obligation is satisfied, which is when (point in time) or as (over time) control of the promised good or service is transferred to the customer.
Revenue is measured at the amount to which we are expected to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods based on consideration specified in the contract with the customer. Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction, that we collect from the customer, are excluded from revenue. When a contract with a customer includes variable consideration such as special pricing agreements and other volume-based incentives, revenue is recognized at the most likely amount based on sales forecasts, for which it is probable that a revenue reversal will not subsequently occur.
Revenue is recorded at a point in time when control over the goods transfers to the customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts with customers. Pulp, tissue, paper and wood products are delivered to our customers in the United StatesU.S. and Canada directly from our mills primarily by either truck or rail. Pulp and paper products are delivered to our international customers primarily by ship are sold with international shipping terms. Revenue is recorded when risk of loss and title of the product passesship. For sales where control transfers to the customer. For sales withcustomer at the terms free on board (“FOB”) shipping point, revenue is recorded when the product leaves the mill,facility, whereas for sales transactions FOBwhere control transfers at the destination, revenue is recorded when the product is delivered to the customer’s delivery site. Sales are reported net of allowances and rebates, and the following criteria must be met before they are recognized: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and we have no remaining obligations, prices are fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Sales of our other products (green power produced from renewable sources wood chips, and other wood relatedwood-related products) are recognized when the products are delivered and are included in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Net loss per shareDistribution costs
We calculate basic net loss per share attributableShipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight after control over a product has transferred to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders by dividinga customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in “Distribution costs” in our net loss by the basic weighted-average numberConsolidated Statements of outstanding common shares. We calculate diluted net income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders by dividing our net income by the basic weighted-average number of outstanding common shares, as adjusted for dilutive potential common shares using the treasury-stock method. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs, DSUs and PSUs. To calculate diluted net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders, no adjustments to our basic weighted-average number of outstanding common shares are made, since the impact of potentially dilutive common shares would be antidilutive.Operations.
Translation
The functional currency of the majority of our operations is the U.S. dollar. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies of these operations and the related income and expense items such as depreciation and amortization are remeasured into U.S. dollars using historical exchange rates. Remaining assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Remaining income and expense items are remeasured into U.S. dollars using a daily or monthly average exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions and from remeasurement of the balance sheet items are reported in “Other (expense) income, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The functional currency of our other operations is their local currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated using a daily or monthly average exchange rate for the period. The resulting translation gains or losses are recognized as a component of equity in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”
Distribution costsDerivatives financial instruments
Distribution costs represent costs associated with handling finished goodsWe regularly enter into derivative financial instruments to manage our commodities price risk. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments and shipping products to customers. Such costs are includedrecorded as either other assets or other liabilities at fair value in “Distribution costs”our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in fair value are recognized in “Other (expenses) income, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
New accounting pronouncements adopted as
78

Table of December 31, 2017Contents
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-16, “Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory,” which eliminates the deferral of the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory until the transferred assets are sold to a third party or recovered through use. This update is effective on a modified retrospective approach for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period, we adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017. For additional information, see Note 15, “Income Taxes.”
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” which eliminates the need to determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation comprised of the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure any goodwill impairment. With this new standard, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill in that reporting unit. These updates are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. As early adoption is permitted, for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests after January 1, 2017, we adopted this ASU concurrently with our 2017 annual goodwill


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Net income (loss) per share
impairment test.We calculate basic net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders by dividing our net income (loss) by the basic weighted-average number of outstanding common shares. We calculate diluted net income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders by dividing our net income by the basic weighted-average number of outstanding common shares, as adjusted for dilutive potential common shares using the treasury-stock method. To calculate diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders, securities that could have potentially dilutive effect on the weighted average number of outstanding common shares include all or a portion of outstanding stock options, RSUs, DSUs and PSUs.
New accounting pronouncements adopted in 2020
ASU 2016-13 “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”
Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted on a modified retrospective basis Accounting Standards Update (or, “ASU”) 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or, the “FASB”) in 2016 and amended in 2018 by ASU 2018-19, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” which introduces the current expected credit losses model in the estimation of credit losses on financial instruments. The adoption of this new accounting guidance did not impact the opening deficit balance as of January 1, 2020. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, our accounts receivable accounting policy was updated accordingly.
ASU 2018-13 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”
Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2018-13 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” issued by the FASB in 2018. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not impact our Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
ASU 2018-15 “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract”
Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract,” issued by the FASB in 2018, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The adoption of this accounting guidance did not materially impact our results of operations or financial position.
Accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of December 31, 20172020
ASU 2019-12 “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”
In January 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” which amendsremoves the specific exceptions to the general principles in ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” and clarifies certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.existing guidance. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet while continuing to recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to current accounting standards. For lessors, the new standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption being permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We planAll amendments to adopt this standardASU must be adopted in the same period on January 1, 2019.a prospective basis, with certain exceptions. We are still evaluating the impact of this standard on our results of operations and financial position as implementation of this project is at the assessment stage.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts from Customers,” which provides a framework that replaces existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. In March 2016, April 2016, May 2016, December 2016, and November 2017, the FASB also issued ASU 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” ASU 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and ASU 2017-14, “Reporting Comprehensive Income, Revenue Recognition and Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (SEC Update),” respectively, which further affect the guidance of ASU 2014-09. These updates are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.
We are finalizing our assessment of the impact of these standards on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our current assessment is subject to change as we continue our analysis; however, we do not currently expect that the adoption of the new revenue standard will have a materialthis accounting guidance to materially impact on our revenues, results of operations or financial position.
Our findings to-date are as follows:
The majority of our revenue arises from contracts with customers in which the sale of goods is generally expected to be the main performance obligation. Accordingly, we expect to recognize revenue for most of our revenue streams at a point in time when control of the asset is transferred to the customer, generally upon delivery of the goods. Based on our review of our contracts with customers, the timing and amount of revenue recognized under ASU 2014-09 is expected to be consistent with our current practice.
Certain of our contracts with customers provide incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, and other volume-based incentives. Currently, we recognize revenue from the sale of goods measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of provisions for customer incentives. If revenue cannot be reliably measured, revenue recognition is deferred until the uncertainty is resolved. Such contract provisions give rise to variable consideration under ASU 2014-09, and will be required to be estimated at contract inception. ASU 2014-09 requires the estimated variable consideration to be constrained to prevent the over-recognition of revenue. Based on our assessment of individual contracts, the amount of revenue recognized under ASU 2014-09, after consideration of the estimated variable consideration and related constraint, is expected to be consistent with our current practice.
ASU 2014-09 also provides presentation and disclosure requirements, which are more detailed than under current GAAP. New requirements include disaggregation of revenue depicting how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows are affected by economic factors, information about the nature and timing of performance obligations, as well as significant judgments made and practical expedients used.The disaggregated revenue information required to be disclosed is expected to be similar to the information currently included in Note 20, “Segment Information.”
We adopted these standards effective January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach and are in the process of identifying and implementing the appropriate changes in processes and internal controls to support revenue recognition and disclosure under the new standard.2020-04 “Reference Rate Reform”
In June 2016,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform,” which introducesprovides optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the current expected credit losses modelpotential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the estimation of credit losseseffects of) reference rate reform on financial instruments.reporting. This update provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This update is effective as of March 12, 2020, through December 31, 2022. We are currently evaluating this accounting guidance and have not elected an adoption date. We do not expect this accounting guidance to materially impact our results of operations or financial position.

79

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 3. Business Acquisition
retrospectivelyOn February 1, 2020 (or, the “Acquisition Date”), we acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. all of the equity securities and membership interests in certain of its subsidiaries, the business of which consists mainly in the operation of three sawmills and related assets in Cross City (Florida) and in Glenwood and El Dorado (Arkansas) (or, the “U.S. Sawmill Business”). The U.S. Sawmill Business acquired produces construction-grade dimensional lumber and decking products from locally sourced southern yellow pine for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019,distribution within the U.S. This acquisition diversified our lumber production, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permittedincreased our operating capacity in the U.S. South.
The fair value of the consideration, paid in cash, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We planthe U.S. Sawmill Business acquired is $173 million. The acquisition is structured as an asset purchase for tax purposes, but treated as a business combination for accounting purposes.
The following table summarizes our final allocation of the purchase price to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2020. We are still evaluating the impactfair values of this accounting guidance on our results of operationsassets acquired and financial position as implementation of this project isliabilities assumed at the assessment stage.Acquisition Date:
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. All amendments to the guidance shall be adopted in the same period on a retrospective basis. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not materially impact the presentation of our cash flows.
(In millions)
Current assets (1)
$19
Fixed assets114
Amortizable intangible assets (2)
21
Operating lease right-of-use assets2
Goodwill (3)
31
Total assets acquired and goodwill$187
Current liabilities$11
Long-term debt, net of current portion2
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion1
Total liabilities assumed$14
Net assets acquired$173
Fair value of consideration transferred$173
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash,” which requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in(1)Includes cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-periodof $1 million.
(2)Amortizable intangible assets identified relate to customer relationships, which have a weighted-average useful life of 10 years. The fair value of the customer relationships was determined using the income approach through an excess earnings analysis discounted at a rate of 12.6%.
(3)Goodwill represents the future economic benefit arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and end-of-period total amounts shownseparately recognized and is mostly attributable to the U.S. Sawmill Business’s assembled workforce and synergies expected from combining our operations with the U.S. Sawmill Business. Goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
The allocation of the purchase price was based on management’s estimate of the statementfair values of the acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches (Level 3). We utilized both the cost and market approaches to value fixed assets, which consider external transactions and other comparable transactions, estimated replacement and reproduction costs, and estimated useful lives and consideration for physical, functional and economic obsolescence. We utilized the income approach to value intangible assets, which considers the present value of the net cash flows. This update is effectiveflows expected to be generated by the intangible assets, and excluding cash flows related to contributory assets.
From the Acquisition Date to the year ended December 31, 2020, our consolidated financial results included sales of $137 million and net income of $43 million attributable to the U.S. Sawmill Business. The U.S. Sawmill Business results of operations are included in the wood products segment, except for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,the El Dorado sawmill, which was idled at the time of the acquisition, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018. The adoptionhas been restarted in the fourth quarter of this accounting guidance will impact2020. In connection with the presentationacquisition of our Consolidated Statementsthe U.S. Sawmill Business, we also recognized transaction costs of Cash Flows. Restricted cash included$3 million in “Other (expense) income, net” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $43 million and $38 million asStatement of December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets,” which clarifies the scope of Subtopic 610-20, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets” and adds guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not materially impact our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” which requires employers that present a measure of operating income in their statements of earnings to disaggregate and present only the service cost component of net periodic benefit pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses (together with other employee compensation costs arising during the period). The other components of the net periodic benefit cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost are to be reported separately outside any subtotal of operating income. This update is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018. As a result, estimated net periodic benefit credits of $55 millionOperations for the year ended December 31, 2018, will be reported outside2020.
80

Table of operating income in our results of operations. Net periodic benefit credits or costs, excluding the service cost component, were credits of $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and costs of $8 million and $50 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.Contents
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”, allowing an election to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings stranded income tax effects resulting from the TCJA. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the TCJA is recognized. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We are still evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance on our results of operations and financial position.


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 3. Acquisition of Atlas Paper Holdings, Inc.
On November 16, 2015, we acquiredAtlas Paper Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Atlas Tissue”), a manufacturer of a range of tissue products for the away-from-home and at-home markets, including virgin and recycled products, covering economy, value and premium grades and operating two tissue mills and a recycling facility in Florida.
The acquisition of Atlas Tissue provided us with an immediate position in the North American consumer tissue market. The acquisition was strategic in nature as it allows us to integrate forward our U.S. market pulp assets.
The fair value of the consideration transferred to acquire Atlas Tissue was $157 million, net of consideration to be recovered of $2 million recorded in “Accounts receivable, net” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.
The following unaudited pro forma information for the yearyears ended December 31, 20152020 and 2019, represents our results of operations as if the acquisition of Atlas Tissuethe U.S. Sawmill Business had occurred on January 1, 2015.2019, excluding the results of operations of the El Dorado sawmill that has been idled since October 2019 and restarted in the fourth quarter of 2020. This pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that would have occurred for the periodperiods presented or that may be expected in the future.
(Unaudited, in millions)20202019
Sales$2,808 $3,021 
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$13 $(70)
Note 4. Other (Expense) Income, Net
(Unaudited, in millions except per share data)2015  
Sales$3,730
 
Net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (261) 
Basic net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (2.82) 
Diluted net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (2.82) 
Other (expense) income, net for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, was comprised of the following:
The unaudited pro forma net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.
(In millions)202020192018
Foreign exchange loss$(4)$(12)$(2)
Insurance recovery (1)
15 
Provision related to a litigation (2)
0 (23)
(Loss) gain on forward commodities contracts(22)
Miscellaneous income7 13 
$(4)$(22)$
(1)We recorded $15 million as other income for the year ended December 31, 2015, excludes $162020, from the settlement of an insurance claim in connection with our acquisition of Atlas Paper Holdings, Inc. (or, “Atlas”) in 2015.
(2)We accrued C$30 million of Atlas Tissue’s transactionlegal indemnity and interest costs loss on extinguishment of debt and other acquisition-related costs. It also excludes $3 million of our transaction costs associatedfor the year ended December 31, 2019, in connection with the Quebec Superior Court decision of the fair value of the shares of former dissenting shareholders of Fibrek Inc. (or, “Fibrek”) upon acquisition which were recorded in “Selling, general2012. See Note 18, “Commitments and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.Contingencies - Fibrek acquisition,” for more information.
Note 4.5. Closure Costs, Impairment and Other Related Charges
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)Accelerated DepreciationSeverance and Other CostsTotal
Paper mill at Amos (Quebec) (1)
$12 $5 $17 
Paper mill at Baie-Comeau (Quebec) (1)
26 12 38 
Other0 (2)(2)
$38 $15 $53 
(1)Due to the overall decrease in demand for newsprint, accelerated by the economic context surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, the Amos and Baie-Comeau paper mills have been temporarily idled since April 2020. As a result, we reassessed the remaining useful lives of the fixed assets and recognized an accelerated depreciation charge of $38 million. We also recognized additional provisions for severance and other costs of $17 million.

81

(In millions)Impairment of AssetsAccelerated DepreciationPension and OPEB Plan Curtailments and OtherSeverance and Other CostsTotal
Pulp mill in Coosa Pines (Alabama) (1)
$55
 $
 $
 $
 $55
 
Permanent closures               
Paper machine in Catawba (South Carolina) 5
  
  2
  4
  11
 
Paper machines in Calhoun (Tennessee) 
  6
  3
  2
  11
 
Paper mill in Mokpo (South Korea) 
  
  
  7
  7
 
Other 
  
  
  3
  3
 
 $60
 $6
 $5
 $16
 $87
 
Table of Contents
(1)
As a result of the continued deterioration of actual and projected cash flows, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $55 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, to reduce the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value, which was determined using the market approach, by reference to market transaction prices for similar assets. The fair value measurement is considered a Level 3 measurement due to the significance of its unobservable inputs.


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Closure costs, impairment and other related charges for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)Accelerated DepreciationSeverance and Other CostsTotal
Indefinite idling
Paper mill at Augusta (Georgia)$8 $10 $18 
(In millions)Impairment of AssetsAccelerated DepreciationSeverance and Other CostsTotal
Paper mill in Mokpo (1)
$13
 $
 $
 $13
 
Permanent closure            
Paper machine in Augusta (Georgia) 
  32
  4
  36
 
Other 9
  3
  1
  13
 
 $22
 $35
 $5
 $62
 
(1)
Due to declining market conditions and rising recycled fiber prices, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $13 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, to reduce the carrying value of the assets to fair value. Management estimated fair value using the market approach, by reference to transactions on comparable assets adjusted for additional risks and uncertainties associated with the deteriorating market environment, as well as increased competition in Asia. The fair value measurement is considered a level 3 measurement due to the significance of its unobservable inputs. In 2017, we announced the permanent closure of our Mokpo paper mill effective March 9, 2017.
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges were $121 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, including $120 million of impairment charges related to the assets from the 2015 were comprisedacquisition of Atlas and its subsidiaries.
Goodwill impairment charge
Following our 2018 annual impairment test of goodwill, we determined that the carrying value of the following:tissue reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value. As a result, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $81 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing the entire goodwill amount as of that date. This impairment charge resulted from cumulative losses of the tissue business and lower-than-expected projected cash flows, driven by operating and market-related factors. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Long-lived assets impairment charges
As a result of the deterioration of estimated future cash flows of Atlas, we recorded for the year ended December 31, 2018, fixed assets impairment charges of $29 million and intangible assets impairment charges of $10 million to reduce the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value. The fair value of fixed assets was estimated using the market approach, by reference to estimated selling prices for similar assets, less costs to sell. The fair value of intangible assets was estimated using the income approach. Projected discounted cash flows utilized under the income approach included estimates regarding future revenues and expenses attributable to Atlas, projected capital expenditures and a discount rate of 12%. These fair value measurements are considered Level 3 measurements due to the significance of their unobservable inputs.
(In millions)Impairment of AssetsAccelerated DepreciationSeverance and Other CostsTotal
Paper mill in Catawba (1)
$176
 $
 $
 $176
 
Permanent closures            
Paper mill in Iroquois Falls (Ontario) 
  
  3
  3
 
Paper machine in Clermont (Quebec) 
  2
  
  2
 
 $176
 $2
 $3
 $181
 
(1)
As a result of declining market conditions, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $176 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, related to our Catawba paper assets, to reduce the carrying value of the assets to fair value. Management estimated the fair value using the income approach. Projected discounted cash flows utilized under the income approach included estimates regarding future revenues and expenses attributable to the Catawba paper activities, projected capital expenditures and a discount rate of 12%. This fair value measurement is considered a Level 3 measurement due to the significance of its unobservable inputs.
Note 5.6. Net Gain on Disposition of Assets
During 2017,2020, we sold the assets of our permanently closed Mokpo paper mill, and various other assets for total consideration of $21 million, resulting inrecorded a net gain on disposition of assets of $15$11 million, which included: the sale of the Augusta paper mill for total cash consideration of $10 million, resulting in a net gain of $9 million; and the sale of the Thorold paper mill for total cash consideration of $4 million, resulting in a net gain of $2 million.
Note 6. Other Income, Net
Other income,During 2018, we recorded a net forgain on disposition of assets of $145 million, which included: the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, was comprisedsale of the following:paper and pulp mill at Catawba (South Carolina) for total cash consideration of $280 million, resulting in a net gain of $101 million; and the sale of the recycled bleached kraft pulp mill at Fairmont (West Virginia) for total cash consideration of $62 million, resulting in a net gain of $40 million.
82
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Foreign exchange gain (loss)$9
 $(7) $(4) 
Gain on disposition of equity method investment (1)
 
  5
  
 
Miscellaneous (expense) income (3)  9
  8
 
 $6
 $7
 $4
 
(1)
On February 1, 2016, we sold for total consideration of $5 million our interest in Produits Forestiers Petit-Paris Inc., an unconsolidated entity located in Saint-Ludger-de-Milot (Quebec), in which we had a 50% interest, resulting in a gain on disposition of $5 million.


Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 7. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The change in our accumulated other comprehensive loss by component (net of tax) for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2020, 2019 and 2018, was as follows:
(In millions)Unamortized Prior Service (Costs) CreditsUnamortized Actuarial LossesForeign Currency TranslationTotal
Balance as of December 31, 2017$52 $(826)$(6)$(780)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(5)(162)(1)(168)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
(19)19 
Net current period other comprehensive loss(24)(143)(1)(168)
Reclassification of stranded income tax(2)(2)
Balance as of December 31, 201828 (971)(7)(950)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(240)(239)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
(12)22 10 
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income(12)(218)(229)
Balance as of December 31, 201916 (1,189)(6)(1,179)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(185)(185)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
(17)67 50 
Net current period other comprehensive loss(17)(118)(135)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$(1)$(1,307)$(6)$(1,314)
(In millions)Unamortized Prior Service CreditsUnamortized Actuarial LossesForeign Currency TranslationTotal
Balance as of December 31, 2016$67
 $(819) $(3) $(755) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 1
  (48)  (3)  (50) 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
 (16)  41
  
  25
 
Net current period other comprehensive loss (15)  (7)  (3)  (25) 
Balance as of December 31, 2017$52
 $(826) $(6) $(780) 
(1)
(1)See the table below for details about these reclassifications.
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2017, were comprised of the following:details about these reclassifications.
83

(In millions)Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossAffected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unamortized Prior Service Credits    
Amortization of prior service credits$(15) 
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs (1)
Curtailment gain (1) 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges (1)
  
 Income tax (provision) benefit
 $(16) Net of tax
Unamortized Actuarial Losses    
Amortization of actuarial losses$50
 
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs (1)
Curtailment loss 1
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges (1)
Settlement loss 1
 
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs (1)
  (11) Income tax (provision) benefit
 $41
 Net of tax
Total Reclassifications$25
 Net of tax
Table of Contents
(1)
These items are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost related to our pension and OPEB plans summarized in Note 14, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.”


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)202020192018Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unamortized Prior Service Credits
Amortization of prior service credits$(4)$(11)$(15)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (1)
Curtailment gain(13)(1)
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (1)
Curtailment gain0 (5)
Net gain on disposition of assets (1)
0 Income tax provision
Net of tax(17)(12)(19)
Unamortized Actuarial Losses
Amortization of actuarial losses57 28 33 
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (1)
Settlement loss28 
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits (1)
Curtailment gain0 (8)
Net gain on disposition of assets (1)
Settlement loss0 
Net gain on disposition of assets (1)
Other items3 
(21)(7)(9)Income tax provision
Net of tax67 22 19 
Total Reclassifications$50 $10 $
(1)These items are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (credit) related to our pension and OPEB plans summarized in Note 16, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.”
Note 8. Net LossIncome (Loss) Per Share
The reconciliation of the basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was as follows:
(In millions, except per share amounts)202020192018
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$10 $(47)$235 
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding86.1 91.4 91.3 
Dilutive impact of nonvested stock unit awards0.3 2.0 
Diluted weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding86.4 91.4 93.3 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:
Basic$0.12 $(0.51)$2.57 
Diluted$0.12 $(0.51)$2.52 
84

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Numerator:         
Net loss attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(84) $(81) $(257) 
Denominator:         
Basic weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding 90.5
  89.9
  92.4
 
Dilutive impact of nonvested stock incentive awards 
  
  
 
Diluted weighted-average number of Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shares outstanding 90.5
  89.9
  92.4
 
Net loss per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders:         
Basic$(0.93) $(0.90) $(2.78) 
Diluted$(0.93) $(0.90) $(2.78) 
The weighted-average number of outstanding stock options and nonvested equity-classified RSUs, DSUs and PSUs (collectively, “stockstock unit awards”awards) that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share, as thetheir impact would have been antidilutive, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was as follows:
(In millions)202020192018
Stock options0.9 1.0 1.2 
Stock unit awards0.6 2.1 
(In millions)2017
2016
2015
Stock options1.4
1.4
1.5
Stock unit awards4.1
2.6
1.4
Note 9. Inventories, Net
Inventories, net as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)2017  2016  (In millions)20202019
Raw materials$108
 $126
 Raw materials$132 $128 
Work in process 38
 45
 Work in process46 46 
Finished goods 175
 183
 Finished goods120 164 
Mill stores and other supplies 205
 216
 Mill stores and other supplies164 184 
$526
 $570
  $462 $522 
In 2017,2020, we recorded charges of $24$25 million for write-downs of mill stores and other supplies primarily relateddue to the permanent closuretemporary idling of twothe Amos and Baie-Comeau paper machines in Calhoun, a paper machine at our Catawba paper mill, and our Mokpo paper mill.mills. In 2016,2019, we recorded charges of $7$13 million for write-downs of mill stores and other supplies primarily as a resultdue to the indefinite idling of the permanent closure of a newsprint machine at our Augusta paper mill. These charges were included in “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 10. Fixed Assets, Net
Fixed assets, net as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
(Dollars in millions)Estimated Useful Lives (Years)20202019
Land and land improvements520$52 $52 
Buildings1040328 313 
Machinery and equipment (1)
2252,128 2,256 
Hydroelectric power plants1040301 303 
Timberlands and timberlands improvements1020136 128 
Construction in progress 100 65 
3,045 3,117 
Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,604)(1,658)
  $1,441 $1,459 
(Dollars in millions)Estimated Useful Lives (Years)2017  2016  
Land and land improvements5 – 20$56
 $77
 
Buildings2 – 40 298
  257
 
Machinery and equipment (1)
5 – 25 2,544
  2,264
 
Hydroelectric power plants10 – 40 292
  287
 
Timberlands and timberlands improvements3 – 20 110
  109
 
Construction in progress (1)
  30
  263
 
   3,330
  3,257
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (1,614)  (1,415) 
  $1,716
 $1,842
 
(1)Internal-use software included in fixed assets, net as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, was as follows:    
(In millions)2017  2016  
Machinery and equipment$111
 $83
 
Construction in progress 
  13
 
  111
  96
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation (42)  (27) 
 $69
 $69
 
(In millions)20202019
Machinery and equipment$124 $115 
Less: Accumulated depreciation(90)(76)
 $34 $39 
Depreciation expense related to internal-use software is estimated to be $16$14 million in 2021, $10 million in 2022, $5 million in 2023, $2 million in 2024 and $1 million in 2025.
We recorded accelerated depreciation of $38 million for eachthe Amos and Baie-Comeau paper mills for the year ended December 31, 2020. We also recorded accelerated depreciation of $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as a result of the next twoindefinite idling of our paper mill in Augusta. See Note 5, “Closure Costs, Impairment and Other Related Charges” for more information.
85

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Depreciation expense related to fixed assets was $163 million, $164 million, and $207 million for the years $12 million fromended December 31, 2020, to 2021,2019 and $8 million in 2022.2018, respectively.
Note 11. Amortizable Intangible Assets, Net
Amortizable intangible assets, net as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
20202019
(Dollars in millions)Estimated
Useful
Lives
(Years)
Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
NetGross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Water rights (1)
1040$19 $9 $10 $19 $$11 
Energy contracts152552 21 31 52 18 34 
Customer relationships (2)
1023 3 20 
Other2 0 2 
  $96 $33 $63 $75 $27 $48 
  2017 2016
(Dollars in millions)
Estimated
Useful
Lives
(Years)
Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Water rights (1)
10 – 40$19
 $5
 $14
  $19
 $4
 $15
 
Energy contracts15 – 25 52
  14
  38
   52
  11
  41
 
Customer relationships10 – 15 14
  2
  12
   14
  1
  13
 
Other  1
  
  1
   1
  
  1
 
  $86
 $21
 $65
  $86
 $16
 $70
 
(1)In order to operate our hydroelectric generation and transmission network, we draw water from various rivers in Quebec. For some of our facilities, the use of such government-owned waters is governed by water power agreements with the province of Quebec, which set out the terms, conditions, and fees (as applicable). In some cases, the agreements are contingent on the continued operation of the related paper mills and a minimum level of capital spending in the region. For our other facilities, the right to generate hydroelectricity stems from our ownership of the riverbed on which these facilities are located.
(1)
(2)In connection with our acquisition of the U.S. Sawmill Business, we identified amortizable intangible assets primarily related to customer relationships. See Note 3, “Business Acquisition” for additional information.
In order to operate our hydroelectric generation and transmission network, we draw water from various rivers in Quebec. For some of our facilities, the use of such government-owned waters is governed by water power leases or agreements with the province of Quebec, which set out the terms, conditions, and fees (as applicable). Terms of these agreements typically range from 10 to 25 years and are generally renewable, under certain conditions. In some cases, the agreements are contingent on the continued operation of the related paper mills and a minimum level of capital spending in the region. For our other facilities, the right to generate hydroelectricity stems from our ownership of the riverbed on which these facilities are located.
Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $5$6 million, $4$3 million and $3$5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets is estimated to be $6 million for 2021 and $5 million per year for each2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
Note 12. Operating Leases
We have operating leases for buildings, machinery, chemical equipment, rail cars, and office equipment with remaining terms of less than one year to 22 years. These leases may include renewal options for up to 15 years.
The components of lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, were as follows:
(In millions)20202019
Operating lease cost$13 $13 
Variable lease cost (1)
$20 $21 
(1)Variable lease cost is determined by the consumption of the next four years and $4 million in 2022.underlying asset.

Operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $12 million.
Supplemental information related to operating leases was as follows:
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Weighted-average remaining operating lease term (in years)10.811.1
Weighted-average operating lease discount rate4.6 %4.7 %
86

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



(In millions)Year Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating cash flow payments for operating lease liabilities$12 $11 
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities$8 $
The maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020, were as follows:
(In millions)Operating Leases
2021$12 
202211 
2023
2024
2025
2026 and thereafter38 
Total lease payments82 
Less: imputed interest18 
Total operating lease liabilities$64 
Note 13. Other Assets
Other assets include countervailing and anti-dumping duty cash deposits on softwood lumber of $194 million and $49 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020, and of $128 million and $34 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies” for more information.
Note 12.14. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)20202019
Trade accounts payable$251 $255 
Accrued compensation76 52 
Accrued interest4 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations14 15 
Income and other taxes payable5 
Other19 13 
 $369 $342 
87
(In millions)2017  2016  
Trade accounts payable$306
 $346
 
Payroll, bonuses and severance payable 55
  51
 
Accrued interest 5
  5
 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations 18
  17
 
Book overdrafts 
  13
 
Income and other taxes payable 10
  7
 
Environmental liabilities 2
  5
 
Other 24
  22
 
 $420
 $466
 

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13.15. Long-Term Debt
Overview
Long-term debt, including current portion, as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, was comprised of the following:
(In millions)2017  2016  (In millions)20202019
5.875% senior notes due 2023:     
5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023:5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023:
Principal amount$600
 $600
 Principal amount$375 $375 
Deferred financing costs (5) (6) Deferred financing costs(2)(3)
Unamortized discount (3) (4) Unamortized discount(1)(1)
Total senior notes due 2023 592
 590
 
Term loan due 2025 46
 46
 
Total 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023Total 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023372 371 
Term loans due 2030Term loans due 2030180 
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities 144
 125
 Borrowings under revolving credit facilities0 71 
Capital lease obligation 7
 1
 
Finance lease obligationsFinance lease obligations9 
Total debt 789
 762
 Total debt561 449 
Less: Current portion of long-term debt (1) (1) 
Less: Current portion of finance lease obligationsLess: Current portion of finance lease obligations(2)(1)
Long-term debt, net of current portion$788
 $761
 Long-term debt, net of current portion$559 $448 
Debt instruments
2023Senior Unsecured Notes
We issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”(or, the “2023 Notes) on May 8, 2013, pursuant to an indenture as of that date (the “indenture”(or, the “indenture). Upon their issuance, the notes were recorded at their fair value of $594 million, which reflected a discount of $6 million that is being amortized to “Interest expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations using the interest method over the term of the notes, resulting in an effective interest rate of 6%. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15, beginning November 15, 2013, until their maturity date of May 15, 2023. In connection with the issuance of the notes, we incurred financing costs of approximately $9 million, which were deferred and recorded as a reduction of the notes. These deferredDeferred financing costs are being amortized to “Interest expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations using the interest method over the term of the notes. On May 27, 2014, the 2023 Notes and related guarantees were registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (as amended, the “Securities Act”Securities Act).
On January 3, 2019, we repurchased $225 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes, pursuant to a notes purchase agreement entered into on December 21, 2018, with certain noteholders, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $3 million in “Other (expense) income, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The 2023 Notes are guaranteed by all of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries that guarantee the ABL Credit Facility (as defined and discussed below). The notes are unsecured and effectively junior to indebtedness under both the ABL Credit Facility and the Senior Secured Credit Facility (as defined and discussed below), to the extent of the value of the collateral that secures these credit facilities and to future secured indebtedness. In addition, the notes are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the notes.

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The terms of the indenture impose certain restrictions, subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications, including limits on our ability to: incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; issue redeemable stock and preferred stock; pay dividends or make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt; make loans and investments; incur liens; issuerestrict dividends, make loans or transfer assets from our subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries; consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person; enter into transactions with affiliates; and enter into new lines of business.
In the event of a change of control, each holder will havehas the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of that holder’s notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest. If we sell certain of our assets and do not use the proceeds to pay down certain indebtedness, purchase additional assets or make
88

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

capital expenditures, each as specified in the indenture, we must offer to purchase the notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest with the net cash proceeds from the asset sale.
The 2023 Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, since May 15, 2017, at redemption prices equal to a percentage of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, as follows:
Year (beginning May 15)Redemption Price
2017104.406%
2018102.938%
2019101.469%
2020 and thereafter100.000%
interest. The fair value of the 2023 Notes (Level 1) was $622$375 million and $543$380 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively,2019, respectively.
On February 2, 2021, we completed the private offering (or, the “Offering”) of $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.875% senior notes due 2026 (or, the “2026 Notes”) at an issue price of 100%. We used the net proceeds of the Offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all of the outstanding $375 million aggregate principal amount of our 2023 Notes at a price of 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and was determined by referenceunpaid interest to, over-the-counter prices (Level 1).but not including, the redemption date. See Note 23, “Subsequent Events” for additional information.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On September 7, 2016, we entered into a senior secured credit facility (the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”) for up to $185 million. The Senior Secured Credit Facility providesThis senior secured credit facility provided a term loan of $46 million with a maturity date of September 7, 2025, (“Term Loan”),and a revolving credit facility of up to $139 million with a maturity date of September 7, 2022 (“Revolving2022. On October 28, 2019, we entered into an amended and restated senior secured credit facility (or, the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”Facility”) for up to $360 million, replacing our existing $185 million senior secured credit facility. The Senior Secured Credit Facility provided a term loan facility of up to $180 million with a delayed draw period of up to three years, and the choice of maturities of six to 10 years (or, the “Term Loan Facility), and a six-year revolving credit facility of up to $180 million with a maturity date of October 28, 2025 (or, the “Revolving Credit Facility”). In March 2020, we borrowed $180 million in term loans under the Term Loan Facility for 10 years, maturing in March 2030. There is also provides an uncommitted option to increase the Senior Secured Credit Facility by up to $175an additional $360 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. On October 28, 2019, we repaid our $46 million term loan by borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain material U.S. subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by a first priority mortgage on the real property of our Calhoun (Tennessee) facility and a first priority security interest on the fixtures and equipment located therein, and related assets.therein.
Interest rates under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are based, at the Company’s election, on either a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”(or, the “LIBOR), or a base rate, in each case plus a spread over the index. The Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains provisions for an expedited amendment procedure for replacing LIBOR if LIBOR quotes are no longer available. The base rate is the highest of (i) the prime rate; (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%; and (iii) the one-month LIBOR plus 1%. The applicable spread over the index fluctuates quarterly based upon the Company’s capitalization ratio, which is defined as the ratio of the Company’s funded indebtedness to the sum of the Company’s funded indebtedness and its adjusted net worth. For loans under the Term Loan Facility, the applicable spread ranges from 0.875%1.0% to 1.5% for base rate loans, and from 1.875%2.0% to 2.5% for LIBOR loans. For loans under the Revolving Credit Facility, the applicable spread ranges from 0.5% to 1.125%1.0% for base rate loans, and from 1.5% to 2.125%2.0% for LIBOR loans. The Senior Secured Credit Facility was issued by a syndicate of lenders within the farm credit system and is eligible for patronage refunds. Patronage refunds are distributions of profits from lenders in the farm credit system, which are cooperatives that are required to distribute profits to their members. Patronage distributions, which are made in either cash or stock, are received in the year after they were earned. Future refunds are dependent on future farm credit lender profits, made at the discretion of each farm credit lender.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to pay a fee in respect of unutilized commitments based on the average daily utilization for the prior fiscal quarter ranging from 0.275% to 0.325% per annum under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The outstanding principal balance under the Term Loan Facility is subject to annual payments of 5% of the initial principal amount commencing in March 2025 with the balance due at maturity in March 2030. Loans under the Revolving Credit Facility equal to 0.325% per annum when average daily utilization underand the Revolving Credit Facility for the prior fiscal quarter is less than or equal to 35% of the total revolving commitments, and 0.275% per annum when average daily utilization under the Revolving Credit Facility for the prior fiscal quarter is greater than 35% of the total revolving commitments.
Base rate loans under the Senior Secured CreditTerm Loan Facility may be repaidprepaid from time to time at our discretion without premium or penalty. LIBOR loans may be repaid from time to time at our discretion,penalty but subject to breakage costs, if any.any, in the case of LIBOR loans. Amounts repaid on

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


the Term Loan Facility may not be subsequently re-borrowed. Principal amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility may be drawn, repaid, and redrawn until September 6, 2022.October 27, 2025.
Pursuant to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are also required to maintain (i) a capitalization ratio not greater than 45% at all times, available liquidity of not less than $100 million, andtimes; (ii) a collateral coverage ratio of not less than 1.81.8:1.0; and (iii) a springing consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0, which is triggered only when adjusted availability under the ABL Credit Facility falls below the greater of $45 million
89

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to 1.0 (eachConsolidated Financial Statements

or 10% of the maximum available borrowing amount under the ABL Credit Facility for 2 consecutive business days. The consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio is the ratio of (a) consolidated EBITDA less certain capital expenditures and less cash taxes paid, to (b) consolidated fixed charges, as defined indetermined under the Senior Secured Credit Facility). Facility.
In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facility contains certain covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, including, among others: (i) requirements to deliver financial statements, other reports and notices; (ii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence and repayment of indebtedness; (iii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence of liens; (iv) restrictions on the Company and certain of its subsidiaries making certain restricted payments; (v) restrictions on making certain investments; (vi) restrictions on certain mergers, consolidations, and asset dispositions; (vii) restrictions on transactions with affiliates; and (viii) restrictions on modifications to material indebtedness. The Senior Secured Credit Facility includes customary representations, and warranties and events of default subject to customary grace periods and notice requirements, also contains certain customary events of default.requirements.
As of December 31, 2017,2020 we had $56$180 million of availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, net of $83which was undrawn; there were $46 million of borrowings.borrowings as of December 31, 2019. The fair valuesvalue of the Revolving Credit Facility (Level 2) approximated its carrying value as of December 31, 2019 and was bearing interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 1.63%.The fair value of the Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility (Level 2) approximated theirits carrying valuesvalue as of December 31, 2017, as the variable2020, and was bearing interest rates reflect current interest rates for financial instruments with similar characteristics and maturities (Level 2)at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.13%.
ABL Credit Facility
On May 14, 2019, we entered into an amendment to thefive-year credit agreement dated May 22, 2015, we entered into a five-year credit agreement for a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL(or, “ABL Credit Facility”Facility),. The amended credit agreement provides for an extension of the maturity date to May 14, 2024, with an aggregate lender commitment of up to $600$500 million at any time outstanding, subject to borrowing base availability based on specified advance rates, eligibility criteria and customary reserves. The ABL Credit Facility will mature on May 22, 2020.
The aggregate lender commitment under the facility includes a $60 million swingline sub-facility and a $200 million letter of credit sub-facility, and we may convert up to $50 million of the commitments under the facility to a first-in last-out facility (“(or, “FILO Facility”Facility), subject to the consent of each converting lender. The ABL Credit Facility also provides for an uncommitted ability to increase the revolving credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.
Revolving loan (and letter of credit) availability under the credit agreementfacility is subject to a borrowing base, which at any time is equal to the sum of (i) 85% of eligible accounts receivable (or 90% with respect to certain insured or letter of credit backed accounts or with accounts owed by investment grade obligors), plus (ii) the lesser of (A) 70% of the lesser of the cost or market value of eligible inventory or (B) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, plus (iii) 100% of the value of eligible cash and 95% of the value of permitted investments held in deposit accounts controlled solely by the administrative and collateral agent (the “agent”(or, the “agent). The FILOcredit agreement includes reserves that reduce the borrowing base, including: (i) a reserve commencing March 16, 2023 for the outstanding principal amount due under the 2023 Notes; and (ii) a reserve for the outstanding principal amount due under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, will becommencing 60 days before its maturity. The borrowing base is subject to a borrowing base, which at any time will be equal to (i) 5% of the eligible accounts receivable, plus (ii) 10% of the appraised net orderly value of the eligible inventory (subject to reduction to 5% over the term of the facility). Each borrowing base described above is subject toother customary reserves and eligibility criteria, in the exercise of the agent’s reasonable discretion.
The obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by certain material subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by first priority liens on and security interests in accounts receivable, inventory and related assets.
Loans under the credit agreement bear interest at a rate equal to thea base rate, the LIBOR, or the Canadian banker’s acceptance (“BA”Dollar Offered Rate (or, the “CDOR) rate,, in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is between 0.00% and 0.75%0.50% with respect to base rate loans and between 1.00% and 1.75%1.50% with respect to LIBOR and Canadian BACDOR loans, in each case based on availability under the credit facility and a leverage ratio.
Loans outstanding under the FILO Facility bear interest at a rate that is 1.25% per annum higher than the interest rate payable on revolving loans not made under the FILO Facility.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the ABL Credit Facility, we are required to pay a fee in respect of unutilized commitments under the ABL Credit Facility equal to 0.30% per annum when average daily utilization under the ABL Credit Facility for the prior fiscal quarter is less than 35% of the total revolving commitments, and 0.25% per annum when average daily utilization under the ABL Credit Facility for the prior fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 35% of the total revolving commitments, as well as a fee in respect of outstanding letters of credit (equal to the applicable margin in respect of LIBOR and Canadian BACDOR loans plus a fronting fee of 0.125% and certain administrative fees).

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Base rate loansLoans under the ABL Credit Facility may be repaid from time to time at our discretion without premium or penalty.penalty, with the exception of breakage costs for LIBOR and Canadian BA rateCDOR loans, may be repaid from time to time at our discretion, subject to breakage costs, if any. However, no loans under the FILO Facility can be repaid
90

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

unless all other loans under the credit agreement are repaid first. We are required to repay outstanding loans that exceed the maximum availability then in effect.
The credit agreement contains customary covenants for asset-based credit agreements of this type, including, among other things: (i) requirements to deliver financial statements, other reports and notices; (ii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence and repayment of indebtedness by the Company and its subsidiaries; (iii) restrictions on the existence or incurrence of liens by the Company and its subsidiaries; (iv) restrictions on the Company and certain of its subsidiaries making certain restricted payments; (v) restrictions on the Company and certain of its subsidiaries making certain investments; (vi) restrictions on certain mergers, consolidations and asset dispositions; (vii) restrictions on transactions with affiliates; (viii) restrictions on amendments or modifications to the Canadian pension and benefit plans; (ix) restrictions on modifications to material indebtedness; and (x) a springing requirement for the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as determined under the credit agreement, of 1.0:1.0, anytime availability under the facility falls below the greater of $50$45 million or 10% of the maximum available borrowing amount for two consecutive business days. Subject to customary grace periods and notice requirements, the credit agreement also contains certain customary events of default.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $356$270 million of availability under the ABL Credit Facility, net of $61 million of borrowings and $40which was undrawn except for $56 million of ordinary course letters of credit outstanding. The fair value of the ABL Credit Facility (Level 2) approximated its carrying value as of December 31, 2019. There were $25 million of borrowings as of December 31, 2019, bearing interest at the base rate.
Effective January 21, 2021, we reduced the commitment under the Canadian tranche of our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility. See Note 23, “Subsequent Events” for additional information.
Loan Facility
On November 4, 2020, our Canadian subsidiary, Resolute FP Canada Inc., entered into a secured delayed draw term loan facility (or, the “Loan Facility”) with Investissement Québec as lender for up to C$220 million ($173 million as of December 31, 2020), representing up to 75% of the countervailing and anti-dumping duty deposits (or, the “Duties”) imposed or expected to be imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and collected by Customs and Border Protection Agency (or, “U.S. Customs”) on U.S. imports of applicable softwood lumber products produced at sawmills of the Borrower and its affiliates located in the province of Quebec, Canada from April 28, 2017 asto December 31, 2022.
The outstanding principal will be repaid in consecutive monthly installments over a period of eight years, after an interest only period of two years from the variabledate of the first draw. Outstanding amounts may be prepaid, partially or fully, at any time at our discretion, without premium or penalty, but subject to payment of accrued and unpaid interest. We are required to make a prepayment equal to any amounts reimbursed by U.S. Customs on account of the U.S. imports of certain softwood lumber products produced at our sawmills located in the province of Quebec, Canada (or, the “Quebec Prepayments”).
The obligations under the Loan Facility will be secured by a first priority security interest rates reflect currentand a control agreement on certain of our bank accounts identified to receive any Quebec Prepayments. In addition, we have agreed to transfer to the designated bank accounts any amounts constituting Quebec Prepayments, and may not grant any other security interest rates for financial instruments with similar characteristicson such bank accounts. The Loan Facility is required to be used exclusively to finance certain of our activities and maturities (Level 2).obligations in the province of Quebec, Canada, and may not be used to pay or reimburse any Duties.
Capital lease obligationThe borrowings under the Loan Facility bear interest at a floating rate equal to 1.45% above the one-month Canadian banker’s acceptance rate. Interest will be payable on a monthly basis.
In 2017, we amended the capital lease obligationThe Loan Facility provides for a warehouse. maximum of 10 draws and the fulfillment of certain conditions upon each draw. We are required to pay a fee of 0.5% of the amounts drawn at the time of each draw.
The Loan Facility contains certain covenants, including, among others, a requirement that we do not move a substantial part of its assets outside the province of Quebec. The Lender reserves the right to terminate the Loan Facility in the event that we have not made any draw before June 30, 2023, subject to certain conditions. The Lender reserves the right to accelerate any outstanding amounts within 60 days of receiving notification of certain change of control events affecting us, if the Lender deems the transaction not to be in its best interest, acting reasonably.
91

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As amended,of December 31, 2020, we had C$165 million (approximately $130 million) of availability under the capitalLoan Facility, which was undrawn.
Finance lease obligation hasobligations
We have finance lease obligations for machinery with maturity dates up to June 2025, and a warehouse with a maturity date of December 1, 2027 andwhich can be renewed for 20 years at our option. Minimum monthly payments are determined by an escalatory price clause.
Debt maturities
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2020, were as follows:
(In millions)Long-term debt
2021$
2022
2023373 
2024
2025
2026 and thereafter182 
 $561 
Assets pledged as collateral
The carrying value of assets pledged as collateral for our total debt obligations was approximately $1.4 billion$1,246 million as of December 31, 2017.2020.
92

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14.16. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We have a number of defined contribution plans covering a portion of our U.S. and Canadian employees. Under the U.S. qualified defined contribution plan, employees are allowed to make contributions that we match. In addition, under the U.S. qualified defined contribution plan,match, and most employees also receive an automatic company contribution, regardless of the employee’s contribution. The amount of the automatic company contribution, in most instances, is a percentage of the employee’s pay, determined based on age and years of service. The Canadian registered defined contribution plans provide for mandatory contributions by employees and by us, as well as opportunities for employees to make additional optional contributions and receive, in somemost cases, matching contributions on those optional amounts. Our expense for the defined contribution plans totaled $21$17 million in both 2017 and 2016,2020, $18 million in 2019, and $20 million in 2015.2018.
In addition to the previously described plans, weWe also have multiple contributory and non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering a portion of our U.S. and Canadian employees. Benefits are based on years of service and, depending on the plan, average compensation earned by employees either during their last years of employment or over their careers. Our plan assets and cash contributions to the plans have been sufficient to provide pension benefits to participants and meet the funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in the United StatesU.S. as well as applicable legislation in Canada. We also sponsor a number of OPEB plans (e.g., health care and life insurance plans) for retirees at certain locations.
Certain of the above plans are covered under collective bargaining agreements.
In December 2020, the pension plan of the Thorold paper mill, which was indefinitely idled in 2017 and sold in 2020, was wound-up following the approval of the pension benefits distribution and assets liquidation. This resulted in the conversion of the buy-in annuity contract to a buy-out contract, and the recognition of a settlement loss of $28 million in “Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the reduction of both pension plan assets and pension benefit obligations by $98 million.
The following tables include both our foreign (Canada) and domestic plans. The assumptions used to measure the obligations of each of our foreign and domestic plans are not significantly different from each other, with the exception of the health care trend rates, which are presented below.

93

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



The changes in our pension and OPEB benefit obligations and plan assets for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the funded status and reconciliation of amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were as follows:
Pension Plans OPEB Plans Pension PlansOPEB Plans
(In millions)2017  2016   2017  2016  (In millions)2020201920202019
Change in benefit obligations:         Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligations as of beginning of year$5,196
 $5,068
 $172
 $174
 Benefit obligations as of beginning of year$5,188 $4,774 $147 $148 
Service cost 19
 20
 1
 1
 Service cost14 15 1 
Interest cost 199
 215
 7
 7
 Interest cost151 181 4 
Actuarial loss (gain) 156
 169
 (7) 
 Actuarial loss (gain)265 386 (6)
Participant contributions 7
 8
 2
 2
 Participant contributions7 2 
Plan amendment 
 1
 (1) 
 
Special termination benefits 5
 
 
 
 Special termination benefits3 0 
Curtailments 1
 
 4
 
 Curtailments(2)(1)
Settlements (29) (28) 
 
 Settlements(118)(18)0 
Benefits paid (365) (380) (13) (15) Benefits paid(341)(347)(13)(14)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 285
 123
 7
 3
 Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes79 190 2 
Benefit obligations as of end of year 5,474
 5,196
 172
 172
 Benefit obligations as of end of year5,246 5,188 136 147 
Change in plan assets:         Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets as of beginning of year 4,073
 4,049
 
 
 Fair value of plan assets as of beginning of year3,862 3,652 0 
Actual return on plan assets 346
 184
 
 
 Actual return on plan assets241 336 0 
Employer contributions 111
 141
 11
 13
 Employer contributions91 81 11 12 
Participant contributions 7
 8
 2
 2
 Participant contributions7 2 
Settlements (29) (28) 
 
 Settlements(118)(18)0 
Benefits paid (365) (380) (13) (15) Benefits paid(341)(347)(13)(14)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 234
 99
 
 
 Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes64 151 0 
Fair value of plan assets as of end of year 4,377
 4,073
 
 
 Fair value of plan assets as of end of year3,806 3,862 0 
Funded status as of end of year$(1,097) $(1,123) $(172) $(172) Funded status as of end of year$(1,440)$(1,326)$(136)$(147)
Amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of:         Amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of:
Other assets$6
 $3
 $
 $
 Other assets$0 $$0 $
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (3) (3) (15) (14) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(3)(4)(11)(11)
Pension and OPEB obligations (1,100) (1,123) (157) (158) Pension and OPEB obligations(1,437)(1,324)(125)(136)
Net obligations recognized$(1,097) $(1,123) $(172) $(172) Net obligations recognized$(1,440)$(1,326)$(136)$(147)
The total benefit obligations and the total fair value of plan assets for pension plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $5,213$5,067 million and $4,110$3,627 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017,2020, and were $4,958$4,923 million and $3,832$3,595 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.2019. The total accumulated benefit obligations and the total fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $5,163$5,034 million and $4,110$3,627 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017,2020, and were $4,903$4,884 million and $3,832$3,595 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.2019. The total accumulated benefit obligations for all pension plans were $5,421$5,212 million and $5,141$5,149 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

The actuarial losses and gains impacting the benefit obligations for our pension and OPEB plans in 2020 are primarily due to changes in the economic environment, which resulted in a decrease to the discount rates selected for the plans as of December 31, 2020, compared to December 31, 2019. The actuarial losses impacting the benefit obligations for our pension and OPEB plans in 2019 were primarily due to changes in the economic environment, which resulted in a decrease to the discount rates selected for the plans as of December 31, 2019, compared to December 31, 2018.
94

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit)
The components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) relating to our pension and OPEB plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, were as follows:
Pension PlansOPEB Plans
(In millions)202020192018202020192018
Interest cost$151 $181 $189 $4 $$
Expected return on plan assets(226)(251)(264)0 
Amortization of prior service credits0 (1)(4)(11)(14)
Amortization of actuarial losses (gains)63 34 38 (6)(6)(5)
Non-operating credits(12)(36)(38)(6)(11)(13)
Service cost14 15 19 1 
Net periodic benefit costs (credits) before special events2 (21)(19)(5)(11)(12)
Curtailments, settlements and other losses (gains) (1)
32 (14)(13)
$34 $(21)$(16)$(19)$(11)$(25)
 Pension Plans OPEB Plans
(In millions)2017  2016  2015   2017  2016  2015  
Service cost$19
 $20
 $23
  $1
 $1
 $1
 
Interest cost 199
  215
  225
   7
  7
  8
 
Expected return on plan assets (254)  (247)  (260)   
  
  
 
Amortization of prior service credits (1)  (1)  (2)   (14)  (15)  (14) 
Amortization of actuarial losses (gains) 55
  54
  84
   (5)  (5)  (5) 
Net periodic benefit cost before special events 18
  41
  70
   (11)  (12)  (10) 
Curtailments, settlements and other losses 7
  
  14
   (1)  
  
 
 $25
 $41
 $84
  $(12) $(12) $(10) 
(1)Includes a settlement loss of $28 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, resulting from the wind-up of the Thorold pension plan.
The prior service credits and the actuarial gains and losses are amortized to “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization“Non-operating pension and distribution costs”other postretirement benefit credits” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, over the expected average remaining service lifetime or the average future lifetime, as applicable, of the respective plans. We estimate that $34 million of actuarial losses and $15 million of prior service credits will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into our Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2018.
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costcosts (credits)
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at the measurement dates (each December 31) and the net periodic benefit costcosts (credits) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, were as follows:
Pension Plans OPEB PlansPension PlansOPEB Plans
2017
 2016
 2015
 2017
 2016
 2015
202020192018202020192018
Benefit obligations:           Benefit obligations:
Discount rate3.6% 3.8% 4.2% 3.6% 3.9% 4.4%Discount rate2.5 %3.0 %3.8 %2.5 %3.1 %3.9 %
Rate of compensation increase2.1% 2.5% 2.5% 

 

 

Rate of compensation increase2.1 %2.1 %2.1 %
Net periodic benefit cost:           
Net periodic benefit cost (credit):Net periodic benefit cost (credit):
Discount rate3.8% 4.2% 4.0% 3.9% 4.4% 4.1%Discount rate3.0 %3.8 %3.6 %3.1 %3.9 %3.6 %
Expected return on assets6.3% 6.2% 6.3% 

 

 

Expected return on assets6.0 %6.5 %6.5 %
Rate of compensation increase2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 

 

 

Rate of compensation increase2.1 %2.1 %2.1 %
The discount rate for our domestic and foreign plans was determined with a model that develops a hypothetical high-quality bond portfolio, where the bonds are theoretically purchased to settle the expected benefit payments of the plans. The discount rate reflects the single rate that produces the same discounted values as the value of the theoretical bond portfolio. In determining the expected return on assets, we considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. In determining the rate of compensation increase, we reviewed historical salary increases and promotions, while considering current industry conditions, the terms of collective bargaining agreements with our employees, and the outlook for our industry. In determining the life expectancy rate of our domestic and foreign plans, we used the most-recentmost recent actuarially-determined mortality tables and improvement scales. For the foreign plans, the mortality tables were adjusted with the result of our historical mortality experience study. The rates used are consistent with our future expectations of life expectancy for the employees who participate in our pension and OPEB plans.

95

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the benefit obligations for our domestic and foreign OPEB plans as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were as follows:
2017 201620202019
Domestic PlansForeign Plans Domestic PlansForeign PlansDomestic PlanForeign PlansDomestic PlanForeign Plans
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year7.2% 4.8% 7.0% 4.2% Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year7.2 %4.8 %7.2 %4.8 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate)4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.0% Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate)4.5 %4.5 %4.5 %4.5 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2030
 2028
 2028
 2028
 Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2033203320322032
For the health care cost trend rates, we considered historical trends for these costs, actual experience of the plans, recently enacted health care legislation as well as future expectations.
Variations of the health care cost trend rate can have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A 1% change in this assumption would have had the following impact on our 2017 OPEB obligation and costs for our domestic and foreign plans:
 1% Increase 1% Decrease
(In millions, except percentages)Domestic PlansForeign Plans Domestic PlansForeign Plans
OPEB obligation$3
 5% $5
 5%  $(3) (4)% $(5) (4)% 
Service and interest costs$
 7% $
 6%  $
 (6)% $
 (5)% 
Fair value of plan assets
The fair value of plan assets held by our pension plans as of December 31, 2017,2020, was as follows:
(In millions)Total  Level 1  Level 2  
Equity securities:         
U.S. companies$882
 $882
 $
 
Non-U.S. companies 1,132
  1,132
  
 
Debt securities:         
Corporate and government securities 1,244
  126
  1,118
 
Asset-backed securities 275
  
  275
 
Cash and cash equivalents 169
  166
  3
 
Other plan liabilities, net (2)  
  (2) 
Total before investments measured at NAV$3,700
 $2,306
 $1,394
 
Investments measured at NAV 677
       
 $4,377
       

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(In millions)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Equity securities:
U.S. companies$737 $737 $0 $0 
Non-U.S. companies1,197 1,197 0 0 
Debt securities:
Corporate and government securities1,086 36 1,050 0 
Asset-backed securities148 0 148 0 
Cash and cash equivalents179 179 0 0 
Other plan assets, net9 0 9 0 
Total before investments measured at NAV$3,356 $2,149 $1,207 $0 
Investments measured at NAV450 
$3,806 
The fair value of plan assets held by our pension plans as of December 31, 2016,2019, was as follows:
(In millions)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Equity securities:
U.S. companies$717 $717 $0 $0 
Non-U.S. companies978 978 0 0 
Debt securities:
Corporate and government securities1,154 145 1,009 0 
Asset-backed securities294 0 294 0 
Cash and cash equivalents158 158 0 0 
Certain insurance contracts (1)
106 0 0 106 
Total before investments measured at NAV$3,407 $1,998 $1,303 $106 
Investments measured at NAV455 
$3,862 
(1)The Level 3 plan assets were purchased during the year ended December 31, 2019. In December 2020, the Level 3 plan assets decreased by $106 million. The decrease includes assets settlements and sales of $98 million and $11 million, respectively, offset by gains of $2 million recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and $1 million recognized in “Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit credits” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
96

(In millions)Total  Level 1  Level 2  
Equity securities:         
U.S. companies$865
 $865
 $
 
Non-U.S. companies 889
  889
  
 
Debt securities:         
Corporate and government securities 1,281
  163
  1,118
 
Asset-backed securities 71
  
  71
 
Cash and cash equivalents 330
  330
  
 
Other plan assets, net 35
  
  35
 
Total before investments measured at NAV$3,471
 $2,247
 $1,224
 
Investments measured at NAV 602
       
 $4,073
       
Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Equity securities include large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap publicly-traded companies mainly located in the United States,U.S., Canada and other developed and emerging countries, as well as commingled equity funds invested in the same types of securities. The fair value of the equity securities is determined based on quoted market prices (Level 1).
Debt securities include corporate bonds of U.S. and Canadian companies from diversified industries, bonds and Treasuries issued by the U.S. government and the Canadian federal and provincial governments, asset-backed securities and commingled fixed income funds invested in these same types of securities. The fair value of the debt securities is determined based on quoted market prices (Level 1), and market-corroborated inputs such as matrix prices, yield curves and indices (Level 2).
Certain insurance contracts include group contracts that have been purchased to cover a portion of the plan members. The fair value of annuity buy-in contracts changes based on fluctuations in the obligation associated with the covered plan members (Level 3).
Other plan assets, and liabilitiesnet, include accrued interest and dividends, and amounts receivable or payable for unsettled security transactions. The fair value of accrued interest and dividends is determined based on market-corroborated inputs such as declared dividends and stated interest rates (Level 2). The fair value of receivables and payables for unsettled security transactions is determined based on market-corroborated inputs such as the trade date fair value of the security (Level 2).
Investments measured at NAV are excluded from the fair value hierarchy tables. These investments are commingled funds, composed of either debt securities, equity securities or real estate investments, where the corresponding NAV per share is equal to the total net assets divided by the total number of shares.
Long-term strategy and objective
Our investment strategy and objective is to maximize the long-term rate of return on our plan assets within an acceptable level of risk in order to meet our current and future obligations to pay benefits to qualifying employees and their beneficiaries while minimizing and stabilizing pension benefit costs and contributions. Diversification of assets is achieved through strategic allocations to various asset classes, and by retaining multiple, experienced third-party investment management firms with complementary investment styles and philosophies to implement these allocations. Risk is further managed by reviewing our investment policies at least annually and monitoring our fund managers at least quarterly for compliance with mandates and performance measures. A series of permitted and prohibited investments are listed in our respective investment policies, which are provided to our fund managers. The use of derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes and investments in the equity or debt securities of Resolute Forest Products and its affiliates is prohibited.
We have established a target asset allocation policy and ranges for each participating defined benefit pension plan based upon analysis of risk/risk and return tradeoffs and correlations of asset mixes given long-term historical returns, prospective capital market returns, forecasted benefit payments and the forecasted timing of those payments. The targeted asset allocation policy of the plan assets is designed to hedge the change in the pension liabilities resulting from fluctuations in the discount rate by investing in debt and other securities, while also generating excess returns required to reduce the unfunded pension deficit by investing in equity securities with higher potential returns. The targeted asset allocation policy of each participating defined benefit pension plan is 50% equity securities, with an allowable range of 30% to 60%, and 50% debt and other securities, with an allowable range of 40% to 70%, including up to 5% in short-term instruments required for near-term liquidity needs. Approximately 60% of the equity securities are targeted to be invested in the U.S. and Canada, with the balance in other developed and emerging countries. Substantially all of the debt securities are targeted to be invested in the U.S. and Canada. The asset allocation for

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


each participating defined benefit pension plan is reviewed periodically and, when necessary, rebalanced to bring the asset allocation within the prescribed ranges.
97

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Expected benefit payments and future contributions
As of December 31, 2017,2020, benefit payments expected to be paid over the next 10 years are as follows:
(In millions)
Pension
Plans (1)
OPEB Plans
2021$342 $12 
2022$335 $11 
2023$328 $10 
2024$321 $10 
2025$314 $
2026 - 2030$1,454 $40 
(In millions)
Pension Plans (1)
OPEB Plans
2018$380
 $15
 
2019 372
  14
 
2020 367
  14
 
2021 363
  13
 
2022 357
  13
 
2023 - 2027 1,694
  60
 
(1)Benefit payments are expected to be paid from the plans’ net assets.
(1)
Benefit payments are expected be paid from the plans’ net assets.
We expect our 20182021 pension contributions (excluding contributions to our defined contribution plans) to be approximately $105 million, including pension contributions of Cdn $87 million ($69 million, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017) related to our Canadian plans.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “PPACA”) was enacted, potentially impacting our cost to provide healthcare benefits to eligible active and retired employees. The PPACA has both short-term and long-term implications on benefit plan standards. Implementation of this legislation began in 2010 and is expected to continue in phases from 2011 through 2020.
We have analyzed this legislation to determine: (i) the impact of the required plan standard changes on our employee healthcare plans, (ii) the effect of the excise tax on high cost healthcare plans and (iii) the resulting costs. The impact, for those changes that were currently estimable, was not material to our results of operations. In 2013, PPACA also introduced the health insurance exchange system to facilitate the purchase of state health insurance. Individuals may purchase insurance from a set of government standardized plans offering federal subsidies. In light of this new arrangement, we decided to transfer post‑Medicare coverage via a Medicare Exchange program starting in 2014 for U.S. non-unionized employees and in 2015 for U.S. unionized employees.$102 million.
Canadian pension funding
Prior to December 31, 2016, theQuebec plans
The funding of our material Canadian registeredQuebec pension plans is subject to Quebec’s Supplemental Pension Plans Act (or, the “SPPA”), which we refer to asis the “affected plans,” was governed by regulations specific to us, adopted by the provinces of Quebec and Ontario. We refer to these regulations, as the “funding relief regulations.” On December 16, 2016, the province of Ontario amended the Ontario funding relief regulation, which we refer to as the “Ontario amendment,” following which, on December 19, 2016, we provided notice to the Quebec pension plan regulatory authoritiesfunding regime generally applicable to pension plans in that we would voluntarily exitprovince. Our contributions to our Quebec plans are determined on a going concern basis under the Quebec funding relief regulation as of December 31, 2016. As a result, sinceQuebec’s SPPA.
Ontario plans
Since January 1, 2017,2019, all of our QuebecOntario pension plans have been subject to Quebec’s Supplementalthe Ontario Pension PlansBenefits Act, or (or, the “SPPA,PBA), which is the pension plan funding regime generally applicable to pension plans in that province. The OntarioPBA provides for funding relief regulation, as amended by the Ontario amendment, continues to apply to us and will end on December 31, 2020.
As a result of the Ontario amendment and our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, from July 2017 through December 2020, our annual basic contribution to the Ontario affected plans became Cdn $9 million, compared to the basic contribution from January 2017 to June 2017 of Cdn $5 million for the six-month period. Our contributions to our Quebec plans are determined annuallypension fund deficits on a going concern basis, underor on a solvency basis if the Quebec’s SPPA.
In addition to the basic contribution, the funding relief regulations required us to makesolvency funded status of a supplemental contribution, beginning in 2016, should the affected plans’ aggregate solvency ratio be more than 2% below the target specified in the regulations for the preceding year, subject to certain conditions. Following the Ontario amendment and our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, we are still required to make a supplemental contribution to the Ontario plans, payable over a three-year period,

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


should the Ontario affected plans’ aggregate solvency ratio be below the 2% target. Given the prevailing interest rates, we do not expect to make a supplemental contribution in 2018.
Should an Ontario plan move to surplus before the funding relief regulation expires in 2020, it will cease to be subject to the Ontario funding relief regulation. After 2020, the Ontario plans will become subject to Ontario funding rules in effect at that time.
We are permitted to exit the Ontario funding relief regulation earlier than December 31, 2020, by providing a notice to that effect to the province of Ontario by December 31 of any year. Our exit from such regulation would take effect for the year following the date of notice. If we elect to exit the Ontario funding relief regulation, our pension plans in Ontario would become subject to the pension plan funding regime generally applicable at that time to pension plans in that province.is below 85%.
Additional undertakings
Our principal Canadian subsidiaries had entered into certain undertakings with the Government of Ontario and Quebec, and Ontario in connection with the adoption of the funding relief regulations in 2010. As a result of our exit from the Quebec funding relief regulation, effective December 31, 2016, the undertakings we had made with the Government of Quebec, as amended,which expired in accordance with their terms. Comparable undertakings we had entered into with the Government of Ontario expired in December 2015. Neither the2015 and 2016, respectively. The expiration of the Quebecthose undertakings nor the Ontario undertakings, eliminateddid not eliminate ongoing obligations we incurred under the terms of those undertakings prior to their expiration, including the undertaking requiring us to make an additional solvency deficit reduction contribution to our pension plans of Cdn $75,C$75, payable over four years, for each metric ton of capacity reduced in Quebec or Ontario, in the event of downtime of more than six consecutive months or nine cumulative months over a period of 18 months.
As part of the 2014 amendments to the funding relief regulations, it was determined that no additional contribution would be made in respect of any capacity reduction in Quebec before April 13, 2013. Also, on March 31, 2017, Accordingly, we reached an agreement with the province of Ontario stipulating that we would no longer be required to make additional contributions for capacity reductions that occurred in Ontario after April 15, 2014. As a result of this agreement, our requirement to make additional contributions to the Ontario affected plans was reduced by Cdn $16 million for 2017 and Cdn $8 million for 2018. We made additional contributions for past capacity reductions to the affected plans of Cdn $14C$4 million and C$2 million in 2017 and will also be required to make our final remaining contributions for past capacity reductions of approximately Cdn $11 million, Cdn $4 million, and Cdn $2 million in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively. The 2020 contribution was the last one required to be made.
As originally adopted, the funding relief regulations provided that corrective measures would be required if the aggregate solvency ratio in the affected plans fell below a prescribed level under the targets specified by the regulations as
98

Table of December 31 in any year through 2014. This requirement was definitively removed in 2013, but under the Ontario regulation, the corresponding 2011 and 2012 amounts in respect of Ontario plans (Cdn $110 million in the aggregate) have been deferred to after the expiration of the funding relief regulations in 2020, and will then be payable over five years in equal monthly installments starting on December 31, 2021, but only up to the elimination of the then remaining deficit, if any.Contents


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 15.17. Income Taxes
(Loss) incomeIncome before income taxes by taxing jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was as follows:
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  (In millions)202020192018
United States$(289) $(227) $(355) 
U.S.U.S.$(126)$(205)$(90)
Foreign 295
 170
 99
 Foreign187 216 477 
$6
 $(57) $(256)  $61 $11 $387 
The income tax (provision) benefitprovision for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was comprised of the following:
(In millions)202020192018
U.S. Federal and State:
Current$0 $$
Deferred0 
 0 
Foreign:
Current0 12 
Deferred(51)(58)(164)
 (51)(58)(152)
Total:
Current0 12 
Deferred(51)(58)(164)
 $(51)$(58)$(152)
99

(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
U.S. Federal and State:         
Current$
 $
 $4
 
Deferred 2
  (11)  32
 
  2
  (11)  36
 
Foreign:         
Current (4)  (5)  
 
Deferred (82)  (3)  (35) 
  (86)  (8)  (35) 
Total:         
Current (4)  (5)  4
 
Deferred (80)  (14)  (3) 
 $(84) $(19) $1
 
Table of Contents
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted into law which, among other changes, reduced the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, and implemented a new system of taxation for non-U.S. earnings, including the imposition of a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries. We are required to recognize the effects of tax law changes in the period of enactment. On December 22, 2017, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the TCJA, allowing us to account for the TCJA provisions under the following scenarios: (a) reflect the tax effects of the TCJA for which the accounting is complete, (b) report provisional amounts for those income tax effects of the TCJA where the accounting is incomplete but a reasonable estimate can be determined, or (c) not to report provisional amounts for any income tax effects of the TCJA for which a reasonable estimate cannot be determined until the reporting period that a reasonable estimate can be determined, and to continue to apply ASC 740 based on the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the enactment of the TCJA. The SEC provides that the accounting must be completed during the 12-month measurement period following the enactment of the TCJA.
Based on available information, we have provisionally estimated the impacts of the TCJA on our 2017 financial results, with the exception of the effects of the newly enacted GILTI regime as a reasonable estimate cannot be determined. Accordingly, we have provisionally decreased our net U.S. deferred income tax assets and related valuation allowance by $356 million and $359 million, respectively, in 2017, mainly to correspond to the lower U.S. federal statutory income tax rate.
The final impact of the TCJA may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, the issuance of additional legislative guidance and clarification, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA. During the measurement period, we will recognize any adjustments to our provisional amounts in the reporting period the adjustments are determined. Accordingly, we continue to evaluate its effects on our 2018 financial results.




RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Effective income tax rate reconciliation
The income tax (provision) benefitprovision attributable to income (loss) before income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%21% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, as a result of the following:
(In millions)202020192018
Income before income taxes$61 $11 $387 
Income tax provision:
Expected income tax provision(13)(2)(81)
Changes resulting from:
Valuation allowance (1)
(11)(43)59 
Foreign exchange(6)(29)
U.S. tax on non-U.S. earnings(23)(7)(65)
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit6 
Foreign tax rate differences(10)(11)(24)
Nondeductible expenses (2)
0 (6)(15)
Other, net (3)
6 (1)
 $(51)$(58)$(152)
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
Income (loss) before income taxes$6
 $(57) $(256) 
Income tax (provision) benefit:         
Expected income tax (provision) benefit (2)  20
  90
 
Changes resulting from:         
Valuation allowance (1)
 247
  (99)  (109) 
Enactment of change in tax rate (2)
 (368)  
  
 
Adjustments for unrecognized tax benefits (3)
 1
  55
  
 
Foreign exchange 6
  (9)  (20) 
Research and development, and other tax incentives 1
  
  1
 
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 10
  6
  12
 
Foreign tax rate differences 23
  11
  8
 
Effect of change in tax rates (4)
 
  
  18
 
Other, net (2)  (3)  1
 
 $(84) $(19) $1
 
(1)
During 2017,(1)During 2020 and 2019, we recorded a decrease in our valuation allowance of $359 million, due to the enactment of the TCJA, offset by an increase of $112 million, primarily related to our U.S. operations where we recognize a valuation allowance against virtually all of our net deferred income tax assets.
During 2016 and 2015, we recorded a valuation allowance of $99$11 million and $109$43 million, respectively, mainly related to our U.S. operations whereoperations.
During 2018, we recognizedrecorded a fulldecrease in our valuation allowance againstof $59 million, primarily related to our net deferredU.S. operations.
(2)During 2018, we recorded an income tax assets.provision of $13 million for a nondeductible goodwill impairment charge, before a corresponding adjustment to valuation allowance.
(2)
(3)During 2020, we recorded a $4 million adjustment related to the settlement of an insurance claim in connection with our acquisition of Atlas.
During 2017, we recorded decreases to our net deferred income tax assets of $356 million due to the enactment of the TCJA, and $12 million due to a lower foreign income tax rate.
(3)
During 2016, we recorded tax benefits of $55 million, almost all of which related to the release of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of the statute of limitations of the applicable jurisdictions.
(4)
During 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit of $18 million as a result of a change in tax rates on deferred income taxes, primarily due to an intercompany asset transfer in connection with an operating company realignment.
Deferred income taxes
At each reporting period, we assess whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized, based on the review of all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimates of future taxable income, past operating results, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The carrying value of our deferred income tax assets reflects our expected ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to utilize these deferred income tax benefits.assets.
Following the assessment of our ability to realize the deferred income tax assets of our U.S. operations, we concluded that existing negative evidence outweighed positive evidence. As a result, we recognizerecognized a full valuation allowance against virtually all of our net U.S. deferred income tax assets. The cumulative losshistorical operating losses of our U.S. operations limited our ability to consider other subjective positive evidence. A valuation allowance does not reduce our underlying tax attributes, nor hinders our ability to use them in the future.
The weight of positive evidence for our Canadian operations, which included a review of historical cumulative earnings and our forecasted future earnings, resulted in the conclusion by management that no significant valuation allowances were required for our deferred income tax assets, in Canada, as they were determined to be more likely than not to be realized.

100

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



DeferredNet deferred income taxestax assets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were comprised of the following:
(In millions)20202019
Fixed assets$(57)$(28)
Operating lease right-of-use assets(15)(16)
Other(25)(28)
Deferred income tax liabilities(97)(72)
Fixed assets297 346 
Pension and OPEB plans408 378 
Net operating loss carryforwards and deduction limitation660 616 
Net capital loss carryforwards41 35 
Undeducted research and development expenditures195 188 
Tax credit carryforwards98 96 
Operating lease liabilities15 16 
Other72 65 
Deferred income tax assets1,786 1,740 
Valuation allowance(774)(753)
Net deferred income tax assets$915 $915 
Amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of:
Deferred income tax assets$915 $915 

101

(In millions)2017  2016  
Fixed assets$(4) $(44) 
Other liabilities (23)  (21) 
Deferred income tax liabilities (27)  (65) 
Fixed assets 506
  520
 
Pension and OPEB plans 330
  392
 
Operating loss carryforwards 619
  838
 
Capital loss carryforwards 12
  11
 
Undeducted research and development expenditures 196
  185
 
Tax credit carryforwards 119
  107
 
Other assets 72
  49
 
Deferred income tax assets 1,854
  2,102
 
Valuation allowance (764)  (1,000) 
Net deferred income tax assets$1,063
 $1,037
 
Amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of:      
Deferred income tax assets$1,076
 $1,039
 
Deferred income tax liabilities (13)  (2) 
Net deferred income tax assets$1,063
 $1,037
 
Table of Contents


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



The balance of tax attributes and their dates of expiration as of December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows:
(In millions)Related
Deferred
Income Tax
Asset
Year of
Expiration
Net operating loss carryforwards and deduction limitation:
U.S. federal: $2,072$435 (1)2023 – 2037
U.S. federal and deduction limitation: $45796 (1)Indefinite
U.S. state: $2,164109 (1)2021 – 2040
U.S. state and deduction limitation: $2217 (1)Indefinite
Canadian federal and provincial (excluding Quebec): $397 2030 – 2039
Quebec: $605 2028 – 2039
Other1 Indefinite
$660 
Net capital loss carryforwards:
U.S. federal and state: $23$5 (1)2025
Canadian federal and provincial (excluding Quebec): $11731 Indefinite
Quebec: $535 Indefinite
$41 
Undeducted research and development expenditures:
Canadian federal and provincial (excluding Quebec): $697$119 Indefinite
Quebec: $83176 Indefinite
$195 
Tax credit carryforwards:
Canadian research and development, and other$78 2022 – 2040
U.S. state and other20 (1)2021 – 2035
$98 
(In millions)Related
Deferred
Income Tax
Asset
Year of
Expiration
Operating loss carryforwards:    
U.S. federal operating loss carryforwards of $2,218$466
(1 
) 
2022 – 2037
U.S. state operating loss carryforwards of $1,868 95
(1 
) 
2021 – 2037
Canadian federal and provincial (excluding Quebec) operating loss carryforwards of $73 18
 2030 – 2037
Other operating loss carryforwards 40
 2019 – 2027
 $619
  
Capital loss carryforwards:    
Canadian net capital loss carryforwards of $43 12
 Indefinite
 $12
  
Undeducted research and development expenditures:    
Canadian federal and provincial (excluding Quebec) undeducted research and development expenditures of $694$116
 Indefinite
Quebec undeducted research and development expenditures of $837 80
 Indefinite
 $196
  
Tax credit carryforwards:    
Canadian research and development tax credit carryforwards$96
 2021 – 2037
U.S. state and other tax credit carryforwards 23
(1 
) 
2018 – 2032
 $119
  
(1)As of December 31, 2020, we had a full valuation allowance against our U.S. operations net deferred income tax assets.
(1)
As of December 31, 2017, we had a valuation allowance against virtually all of our U.S. operations net deferred income tax assets.
Our U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards are subject to annual limitations under § 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, § 382, as amended, (“(or, “IRC § 382”382) limitation,, resulting from a previous ownership change. We do not expect that IRC § 382 would limit the utilization of our available U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards prior to their expiration.
We consider our foreign earnings to be permanently invested. Accordingly, we do not provide for the additional U.S. and foreign income taxes that wouldcould become payable upon remittance of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as we are evaluatingsubsidiaries. It is not practicable to estimate the reinvestment ofincome tax liability that might be incurred if such earnings forwere remitted to the provisionU.S.
102

Table of the TCJA. In addition, we do not expect to be impacted by the one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed earnings.Contents
Deferred tax charge
On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-16, “Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory,” which eliminates the deferral of the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory until the transferred assets are sold to a third party or recovered through use. Accordingly, the deferred tax charge recognized in 2015 as a result of a gain on an intercompany asset transfer in connection with an operating company realignment was eliminated, resulting in a decrease in “Other assets” of $35 million and an increase in deferred tax assets of $32 million, with a cumulative-effect adjustment of $3 million to “Deficit” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2017.


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Unrecognized tax benefits
The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
(In millions)20202019
Beginning of year$29 $28 
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Settlements with taxing authorities(2)
Positions taken in the prior period1 
Expirations of statute of limitations0 (1)
End of year$28 $29 
(In millions)2017  2016  
Beginning of year$44
 $97
 
Increase (decrease) in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from:      
Enactment of change in tax rate (1)
 (15)  
 
Positions taken in the current period 
  1
 
Expirations of statute limitations (2)
 
  (55) 
Settlements with taxing authorities (1)  (1) 
Change in foreign exchange rate 
  2
 
End of year$28
 $44
 
(1)
During 2017, previously unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $15 million due toIf the enactment of the TCJA.
(2)
During 2016, we released $55 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of the statute of limitations of the applicable jurisdictions.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as components of the income tax provision. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, ifwere recognized as of December 31, 2020, $2 million would affect the effective tax rate is $2 million.rate.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to audits from federal, state, provincial and other tax authorities. U.S. federal tax returns for 20142016 and subsequent years, as well as Canadian tax returns for 20132016 and subsequent years, remain subject to examination by tax authorities.
We do not expect a significant change to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. However, any adjustments arising from certain ongoing examinations by taxingtax authorities could alter the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions, or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions, and these adjustments could differ from the amount accrued. We believe that taxes accrued in our Consolidated Balance Sheets fairly represent the amount of income taxes to be settled or realized in the future.
Note 16.18. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
In the normal course of business, we have entered into various supply agreements, water rights agreements, purchase commitments and harvesting rights agreements (for land that we manage for which we make payments to various Canadian provinces based on the amount of timber harvested).
As of December 31, 2020, these commitments were as follows:
(In millions)
Commitments (1)
2021$73 
202264 
202345 
2024
2025
2026 and thereafter16 
 $202 
(1)Includes energy purchase obligations of $148 million through 2027 for certain of our pulp and paper mills.
Legal matters
We become involved in various legal proceedings, claims and governmental inquiries, investigations, and other disputes in the normal course of business, including matters related to contracts, commercial and trade disputes, taxes, environmental issues, activist damages, employment and workers’ compensation claims, grievances, human rights complaints, pension and benefit plans and obligations, health and safety, product safety and liability, asbestos exposure, financial reporting and disclosure obligations, corporate governance, Indigenous peoples’ claims, antitrust, First Nations claims,governmental regulations, and other matters. Although the final outcome is subject to many variables and cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty, we regularly assess the status of the matters and establish provisions (including legal costs expected to be incurred) when we believe an adverse
103

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

outcome is probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Except as described below and for claims that cannot be assessed due to their preliminary nature, we believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters outstanding or pending as of December 31, 2017,2020, will not have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Countervailing dutyAsbestos-related lawsuits
We are involved in a number of asbestos-related lawsuits filed primarily in U.S. state courts, including certain cases involving multiple defendants. These lawsuits principally allege direct or indirect personal injury or death resulting from exposure to asbestos-containing premises. While we dispute the plaintiffs’ allegations and anti-dumping investigations on uncoated groundwood paper
On January 9, 2018,intend to vigorously defend these claims, the U.S. Departmentultimate resolution of Commerce (“Commerce”) announced its preliminary determinations in its countervailing duty investigationthese matters cannot be determined at this time. These lawsuits frequently involve claims for unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and we are unable to reasonably estimate a range of Canadian-origin uncoated groundwood (“UGW”) paper exported to the U.S. As a result, since January 16, 2018, we have been required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. at a rate of 4.42% for estimated countervailing duties onpossible losses. However, unfavorable rulings, judgments or settlement terms could materially impact our U.S. imports of the UGW paper produced at our Canadian mills, with the exception of supercalendered (“SC”) paper, which is subject to distinct countervailing duties, as further discussed below. Commerce has not yet issued its preliminary determination in the anti-dumping investigation. For additional information, see Note 23, “Subsequent Event.”

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Statements. Hearings for certain of these matters are scheduled to occur in 2021.
Countervailing duty and anti-dumping investigations of softwood lumber products
On November 25, 2016, countervailing duty and anti-dumping petitions were filed with the U.S. Department of Commerce (or, “Commerce”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”(or, “ITC) by certain U.S. softwood lumber products producers and forest landowners, requesting that the U.S. government impose countervailing and anti-dumping duties on Canadian-origin softwood lumber products exported to the U.S. One of our subsidiaries was identified in the petitionpetitions as being a Canadian exporting producer of softwood lumber products to the U.S. and was selected as a mandatory respondent to be investigated by Commerce in both the countervailing duty and anti-dumping investigations.
On April 24, 2017, Commerce announced its preliminary determinationsdetermination in the countervailing duty investigation and, as a result, after April 28, 2017, we were required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. Customs at a rate of 12.82% for estimated countervailing duties on the vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills. The preliminary rate remained in effect until August 26, 2017. Commerce changed the rate in its final affirmative determination on November 2, 2017, but the new rate did not take effect until December 28, 2017, following the ITC’s final affirmative determination and the publication by Commerce of a countervailing duty order. Since that date,Until November 30, 2020, we have been required to resume payingpay cash deposits to the U.S,U.S. Customs at a rate of 14.7%14.70% for the vast majority of our U.S. imports of Canadian-produced softwood lumber product U.S. imports fromproducts. On December 1, 2020, Commerce issued its final results in the countervailing duties first administrative review and established our Canadian sawmills.new rate at 19.10% for countervailing duties. This rate will continueapply until Commerce sets a new duty rate in ansubsequent administrative review,reviews, or a new rate may be set through a remand determination shouldby a binational panel formed pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”or United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, as the case may be (or, “Panel”) binational panel on appeal remand the final determination to Commerce.appeal. Through December 31, 2017,2020, our cash deposits totaled $17$194 million and, based on the 14.7%19.10% rate and our current operating parameters, could be as high as $65$75 million per year.
On June 26, 2017, Commerce announced its preliminary determinationsdetermination in the anti-dumping investigation and, as a result, after June 30, 2017, we were required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. Customs at a rate of 4.59% for estimated anti-dumping duties on the vast majority of our U.S. imports of softwood lumber products produced at our Canadian sawmills. On November 2, 2017, Commerce announced its final determinationsaffirmative determination in the anti-dumping investigation and, as a result, sincefrom November 8, 2017 to November 29, 2020, we have been required to pay cash deposits to the U.S,U.S. Customs, at a rate of 3.2%3.20% for the vast majority of our U.S. imports of Canadian-produced softwood lumber product U.S. imports fromproducts. On November 30, 2020, Commerce issued its final results in the anti-dumping first administrative review and established our Canadian sawmills, thenew rate thatat 1.15% for anti-dumping duties. This rate will apply until Commerce sets a new duty rate in ansubsequent administrative reviewreviews, or in a possiblenew rate may be set through a remand determination.determination by a Panel on appeal. Through December 31, 2017,2020, our cash deposits totaled $9$49 million and, based on the 3.2%1.15% rate and our current operating parameters, could be as high as $15$5 million per year.
On April 1, 2019, Commerce published a notice initiating the administrative reviews of the countervailing duty and anti-dumping orders on softwood lumber products from Canada. We were selected as a mandatory respondent in these administrative reviews and we are in the process of responding to Commerce with the information requested. On March 10, 2020, Commerce published a notice initiating the second administrative review of the countervailing duty and anti-dumping orders on softwood lumber products from Canada. We were selected as a mandatory respondent for the second administrative review of the countervailing duty order.
In parallel, on September 4, 2019, a Panel issued an interim decision upholding the affirmative final injury determinations of the ITC in both investigations of softwood lumber products from Canada. The Panel remanded the ITC to reconsider several findings and ordered the ITC to submit its redetermination on remand within 90 days from the date of the Panel interim
104

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

decision. On December 19, 2019, the ITC issued its redetermination on remand that maintained the affirmative final injury determinations, and on May 22, 2020, the Panel issued its final decision and affirmed in its entirety the ITC’s injury determination on remand. On January 6, 2021, and January 19, 2021, we filed our complaints supporting Panel reviews of the final results in the countervailing and anti-dumping duty ratesfirst administrative reviews.
In addition, on August 24, 2020, the World Trade Organization’s (or, “WTO”) dispute panel issued a report (or, the “Panel Report”) in the case brought by the government of 14.7%Canada in “United States — Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada” (DS533), concluding, among other things, that Commerce acted inconsistently with the Agreement on Subsidies and 3.2%, respectively, will continue until Commerce sets a duty rate in an administrative review, or a new rate may be set through a remand determination should a NAFTA binational panelCountervailing Measures on most of the matters. On September 28, 2020, the United States notified the WTO’s dispute settlement body of its decision to appeal remand the final determination to Commerce.Panel Report.
We are not presently able to determine the ultimate resolution of these matters, but we believe it is not probable that we will ultimately be assessed with significant duties, if any, on our U.S. imports of Canadian-produced softwood lumber products. Accordingly, no0 contingent loss was recorded in respect of these petitions in our Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations, for the year ended December 31, 2017, and our cash deposits were recorded in “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Countervailing duty investigation on SC paper
On February 26, 2015, a countervailing duty petition was filed with Commerce and the ITC by certain U.S. SC paper producers requesting that the U.S. government impose countervailing duties on Canadian-origin SC paper exported to the U.S. market. One of our subsidiaries was identified in the petition as being a Canadian exporting producer of SC paper to the U.S. and was selected as a mandatory respondent to be investigated by Commerce. As a result of that investigation, after August 3, 2015, we were required to pay cash deposits to the U.S. for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports of SC paper produced at our Canadian mills. Between August 3, 2015 and October 15, 2015, we were required to make cash deposits at a rate of 2.04%. On October 15, 2015, that rate increased to 17.87%, 17.10% of which was not based on any countervailable subsidy we received, but rather on a punitive application of “adverse facts available.” We are required to continue making cash deposits at the 17.87% rate until Commerce sets a countervailing duty rate in an administrative review or a new rate is set through a remand determination of a NAFTA binational panel. We were selected as a mandatory respondent in the first administrative review, which Commerce commenced on February 13, 2017. On January 3, 2018, Commerce announced its preliminary determinations in this administrative review, whereby it determined that we received countervailable subsidies of 1.79% that benefited our Canadian production of SC paper during the relevant period (from August 3, 2015 to December 31, 2015). Our countervailing duty rate for our SC paper exported to the U.S. market in 2015, if any, will be based on Commerce’s final determinations in this administrative review. Following the initial administrative review, we may remain subject to annual administrative reviews until December 2020, or possibly later, and the duty rate, if any, applicable to our SC paper exported to the U.S. market during periods subsequent to December 31, 2015, will be based on Commerce’s determinations in such future administrative reviews. Both the petitioner and the respondent companies may request an administrative review. However, Commerce does not have to review separately more than two companies in any one administrative review, typically the two

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


with the greatest volume of exports during the period of review. Were we not granted our request for an administrative review when other companies were to be reviewed, we would be assigned a weighted-average rate based on the rates of the individually reviewed companies. Regardless, the countervailing duty rate may change annually, subject to annual administrative reviews. The determination in each administrative review is subject to appeal. To the extent the countervailing duty rate set by Commerce is lower than 17.87%, we will recover excess deposits, plus interest. If the countervailing duty rate set by Commerce is at or above 17.87%, the deposits and any deficiency will be converted into actual countervailing duties.
Following Commerce’s rate determination in October 2015, we appealed that determination to a bi-national panel under the NAFTA (the “Panel”). On April 13, 2017, the Panel issued its decision, remanding the matter to Commerce and upholding several of Commerce’s determinations, including among others its application of adverse facts available in setting our 17.87% subsidy rate. Notwithstanding the Panel’s decision, Commerce’s prior determination of adverse facts available does not apply in an administrative review. In addition, the Panel’s decision can be challenged by the Canadian government, although not until the conclusion of the remand process. The Canadian government has already filed a separate World Trade Organization challenge to Commerce’s countervailing duty determination in the SC paper investigation, including Commerce’s use of adverse facts available against us.
Through December 31, 2017, our cumulative cash deposits totaled $49 million, and based on our current operating parameters, could be as high as $25 million per year. We are not presently able to determine the ultimate resolution of this matter, but we believe it is not probable that we will ultimately be assessed with significant countervailing duties, if any, on our Canadian-produced SC paper. Accordingly, no contingent loss was recorded in respect of this petition in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. These cash deposits were recorded in “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Jedson Case
On March 9, 2017, Jedson Engineering, Inc. and Jedson C.M., Inc. (the “Jedson plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against our subsidiary, Resolute FP US Inc., and other defendants in state court in Tennessee. The complaint alleged breach of contract and violation of Tennessee’s Prompt Pay Act for failure to pay for services in connection with the design and construction of our Calhoun tissue project, and sought a recovery of, and enforcement of mechanic’s liens for, approximately $10 million, plus interest and cost of litigation. On April 17, 2017, we filed an answer and counterclaim alleging, among other things, breach of contract and professional negligence by the Jedson plaintiffs and seeking recovery for, among other things, resulting costs on the project. On April 4, 2017, the Jedson plaintiffs also filed a motion for an injunction under the Prompt Pay Act seeking immediate payment of monies claimed and, on April 20, 2017, a motion to abate Resolute FP US Inc.’s counterclaim, both of which we opposed and have not been heard by the court. On August 25, 2017, the Jedson plaintiffs amended their complaint. As amended, the complaint includes allegations of fraud, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and a claim for punitive damages in an amount of up to approximately $20 million. Effective February 20, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement to submit their disputes to binding private arbitration, including another complaint filed by a subcontractor of the Jedson plaintiffs (ProEnergy Crafts Inc.) against the Jedson plaintiffs, Resolute Forest Products US Inc. and other defendants for less than $1 million that had been consolidated with the other proceedings. On February 23, 2018, the state court issued an order staying the consolidated court proceedings pending completion of the arbitration subject to limited exceptions regarding certain defined procedural matters. The Company disputes the plaintiffs’ allegations, and intends to vigorously defend the action. The lawsuit is at a preliminary stage. Accordingly, we are not presently able to determine the ultimate resolution of this matter or to reasonably estimate the potential impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Modification of U.S. OPEB plan
Effective January 1, 2015, we modified our U.S. OPEB plan so that unionized participants, upon reaching Medicare eligibility, are provided Medicare coverage via a Medicare Exchange program rather than via a Company-sponsored medical plan. On March 2, 2016, a proposed class action lawsuit (Reynolds, et al v. Resolute Forest Products Inc., Resolute FP US Inc., Resolute FP US Health and Resolute Welfare Benefit Plan) was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (“District Court”) on behalf of certain Medicare-eligible retirees who were previously unionized employees of our Calhoun, Catawba, and Coosa Pines mills, and their spouses and dependents (the “proposed class”). The plaintiffs allege that the modifications described above breach the collective bargaining agreements and plan covering the members of the proposed class in the lawsuit. Plaintiffs seek reinstatement of the health care benefits as in effect before January 1, 2015, for the proposed class in the lawsuit. On May 23, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The motion to dismiss was denied by the District Court on March 1, 2017. On June 28, 2017, a settlement agreement in principle was reached between the parties to the lawsuit. Because the settlement will resolve the claims of the proposed class, court approval of the settlement will be required. A final settlement order issued by the court would result in an amendment of our U.S. OPEB plan and a corresponding increase to both “Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations” and “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in our

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Consolidated Balance Sheet, with any such increase to be recorded at the date the plan amendment is adopted. We do not expect that the resulting increase would have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fibrek acquisition
Effective July 31, 2012, we completed the final step of the transaction pursuant to which we acquired the remaining 25.4%25.40% of the outstanding Fibrek Inc. (“Fibrek”(or, “Fibrek) shares, following the approval of Fibrek’s shareholders on July 23, 2012, and the issuance of a final order ofby the Quebec Superior Court in Canada (or, “Quebec Superior Court”) approving the arrangement on July 27, 2012. Certain former shareholders of Fibrek exercised (or purported to exercise) rights of dissent in respect of the transaction, asking for a judicial determination of the fair value of their claim under the Canada Business Corporations Act. No consideration has to date been paid toOn September 26, 2019, the former Fibrek shareholders who exercised (or purported to exercise) rights of dissent. Any such consideration will only be paid out upon settlement or judicial determination ofQuebec Superior Court rendered a decision fixing the fair value of their claimsthe shares of the dissenting shareholders at C$1.99 per share, or C$31 million in aggregate, plus interest and will be paid entirelyan additional indemnity, for a total currently estimated at C$44 million payable in cash. Accordingly,We had previously accrued C$14 million for the payment of the dissenting shareholders’ claims. Following the court decision, we cannot presently determineaccrued an additional C$30 million ($23 million), and as a result recorded $23 million in “Other (expense) income, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the amount that ultimately will be paid to former holders of Fibrek shares in connection with the proceedings, but we have accrued approximately Cdn $14 million ($11 million, based on the exchange rate in effectyear ended on December 31, 2017) for2019. Of the eventualtotal amount of C$44 million, C$19 million ($14 million) was payable immediately and paid on October 2, 2019, bringing the remaining balance to C$25 million ($20 million and $19 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively), which was recorded in “Other liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. We are appealing the decision, therefore the payment of those claims.any additional consideration and its timing will depend on the outcome of the appeal. On November 13, 2019, a legal hypothec in the amount of C$30 million ($24 million) was registered on our Saint-Félicien (Quebec) immovable and movable property to secure the payment of any additional amounts following the outcome of the appeal. The hearing in this matter is expected tohas not yet been scheduled but could occur in 2019.2021.
Partial wind-ups of pension plans
On June 12, 2012, we filed a motion for directives with the Quebec Superior Court, the court with jurisdiction in the creditor protection proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (or, the “CCAA (the “CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings”Proceedings), seeking an order to prevent pension regulators in each of Quebec, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador from declaring partial wind-ups of pension plans relating to employees of former operations in New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador, or a declaration that any claim for accelerated reimbursements of deficits arising from a partial wind-up is a barred claim under the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings. We contend, among other things, that any such declaration, if issued, would be inconsistent with the Quebec Superior Court’s sanction order confirming the CCAA debtors’ CCAA Plan of Reorganization and Compromise, as amended, and the terms of our emergence from the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings. A partial wind-up would likely shorten the period in which any deficit within those plans, which could reach up to Cdn $150C$150 million ($120 million, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017)118 million), would have to be funded if we do not obtain the relief sought. The hearing in this matter is expected tohas not yet been scheduled but could occur in 2018.2021.
Environmental matters
We are subject to a varietynumber of federal or national, state, provincial, and local environmental laws, regulations, and regulationsorders in the jurisdictions in which we operate.various jurisdictions. We believe our operations are in material compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations. Environmental regulations promulgated and orders issued in the future could require substantial additional expenditures for compliance and could have a material impact on us, in particular, and the industry in general.
We may be a “potentially responsible party” with respect
105

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to four hazardous waste sites that are being addressed pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (commonly known as Superfund) or the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action authority. We believe we will not be liable for any significant amounts at any of these sites.Consolidated Financial Statements

We have recordedenvironmental liabilities of $15 million and $8 million of environmental liabilitiesrecorded as of both December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, primarily related to environmental remediation related to closed sites. The amount of these liabilities represents management’s estimate of the ultimate settlement based on an assessment of relevant factors and assumptions and could be affected by changes in facts or assumptions not currently known to management for which the outcome cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. These liabilities are included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” or “Other liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We also have also recorded $24asset retirement obligations of $25 million and $23$26 million of asset retirement obligationsrecorded as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively,2019, primarily consisting of liabilities associated with landfills, sludge basins and the dismantling of retired assets. These liabilities are included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” orand “Other liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other matters
On October 30, 2014, we received a notice from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry of Ontario (the “MNRF”) directing us to repay a conditional amount of Cdn $23 million ($18 million, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017) offered to us in 2007 toward the construction of an electricity-producing turbine, should we fail to restart our Fort Frances (Ontario) pulp and paper mill or otherwise implement an alternative remedy acceptable to the MNRF. Several

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


extensions of the deadline to implement an alternative remedy were granted to us by the MNRF, the last of which extended the remedy date to June 30, 2017. However, as a result of an agreement reached on June 29, 2017, we will not be required to repay this amount.
Note 17.19. Share Capital
Common stock
We are authorized under our certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, to issue up to 190 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 9,020,96014,320,960 shares arehave been reserved for issuance under the Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive PlanPlans (as amended, the “Incentive Plan”defined in Note 20, “Share-Based Compensation”).
Treasury stock
On May 28, 2015,March 2, 2020, our board of directors authorized a $50share repurchase program of up to 15% of our common stock, for an aggregate consideration of up to $100 million. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 6.9 million increase toshares at a cost of $30 million under this program. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we repurchased 4.8 million shares at a cost of $24 million under our existing $100$150 million share repurchase program, which was originally launchedcompleted in May of 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased an additional 5.5 million shares, at a cost of $59 million.2019. We did not0t repurchase any shares during 2017 and 2016. There remains $24 million under the program.2018.
Dividends
We declared and paid a special dividend of $1.50 per share ($136 million) on our common stock in 2018. We did not0t declare or pay any dividends on our common stock during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015.2019.
Preferred stock
We are authorized under our certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, to issue 10 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, no2019, 0 preferred shares were issued and outstanding.
Note 18.20. Share-Based Compensation
Incentive PlanPlans
The Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan, which became effective in 2010 and isas amended (or, the “Incentive Plan”), administered by the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee of the board of directors, became effective in 2010 and provides for the grant of equity-based and liability-based awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, DSUs, PSUs (collectively, “stockstock incentive awards”awards), and cash incentive awards to certain of our officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors. As discussed in Note 17, “Share Capital,” we have been authorized to issueThe Incentive Plan reserved for issuance 9 million shares for stock incentive awards for up to 9awards. In 2019, we established and adopted the Resolute Forest Products 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (or, the “2019 Incentive Plan”), which authorized 3 million shares to be issued as stock incentive awards. In 2020, an additional 2.3 million shares were authorized, for a total of 5.3 million shares. Since the adoption of the 2019 Incentive Plan, no more awards can be granted under the Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2017, approximately 1.32020, 2.2 million shares were available for issuance.grants under the 2019 Incentive Plan. We refer to both the Incentive Plan and the 2019 Incentive Plan as the “Incentive Plans”.
Awards for employees who retire (upon meeting certain age and service criteria) at least six months after the grant date and prior to the end of the vesting period will continue to vest after retirement, in accordance with the normal vesting schedule. The requisite service periods for the stock incentive awards are reduced on an individual basis, as necessary, to reflect the grantee’s individual retirement eligibility date.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, share-based compensation expense under the Incentive PlanPlans was $18$14 million (no($1.2 million tax benefit), $11$2 million (no(0 tax benefit) and $12$17 million (no($1 million tax benefit), respectively. As of
106

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017,2020, there was approximately $10$13 million of unrecognized compensation cost, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining service period of three years.
Stock options
Under the Incentive Plan,Plans, stock options become exercisable ratably over a period of four years and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with their terms, expire 10 years from the date of grant. New shares of our common stock are issued upon the exercise of a stock option. In certain cases, we withhold shares in respect of option costs and applicable taxes.
We have not granted any stock options since 2013. Since the adoption of the 2019 Incentive Plan, stock options can no longer be granted under our Incentive Plans.

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The activity of outstanding stock options for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, was as follows:
 
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Life (years)
Balance as of December 31, 20161,415,971
 $15.77
 5.8 
Forfeited(2,774)  15.66
   
Expired(108,656)  14.09
   
Balance as of December 31, 20171,304,541
 $15.90
 4.8 
Exercisable as of December 31, 20171,304,541
 $15.90
 4.8 
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Life (years)
Balance as of December 31, 2019959,399 $16.09 2.8
Forfeited(46,498)$16.14 
Balance as of December 31, 2020912,901 $16.09 1.8
Exercisable as of December 31, 2020912,901 $16.09 1.8
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised in 20152018 was less than $1 million. NaN stock options were exercised in 2020 and 2019.
Restricted stock units and deferred stock units
Under the Incentive Plan,Plans, each RSU and DSU granted provides the holder upon vesting the right to receive one1 share of our common stock for equity-based awards, and the equivalent in cash for liability-based awards. The awards vest ratably over a period of four years for employees and one year for directors. Awards to employees are settled upon vesting, while awards to directors are settled ratably over a period of three years or upon separation from the board of directors, as applicable, based on the director’s country of residency. We withhold shares in respect of applicable taxes.
The activity of nonvested RSUs and DSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, was as follows:
 
Number of
Units
Weighted-
Average Fair
Value at Grant
Date
Balance as of December 31, 20162,554,639
 $6.20 
Granted434,022
  7.34 
Vested(909,575)  7.36 
Forfeited(97,664)  5.28 
Balance as of December 31, 2017 (1)
1,981,422
 $5.96 
(1)    Includes 17,161 liability-based awards.
Number of Units
Equity-Based AwardsLiability-Based AwardsTotalWeighted-
Average Fair
Value at Grant
Date
Balance as of December 31, 20191,356,016 755,934 2,111,950 $6.32
Granted688,797 1,200,163 1,888,960 $3.87
Vested(688,126)(695,347)(1,383,473)$5.20
Forfeited(77,672)(132,486)(210,158)$5.24
Balance as of December 31, 20201,279,015 1,128,264 2,407,279 $5.14
There were 284,688225,168 equity-based and 316,435 liability-based RSUs and DSUs granted to directors that vested but were not settled as of December 31, 2017.2020.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of all RSUs and DSUs granted in 20162019 and 2015,2018, was $3.97$5.55 and $7.94,$8.93, respectively. The total fair value of RSUs and DSUs vested in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was $8$7 million, $5 million and $12 million, respectively. We paid $3 million, $1 million and $3$2 million for liability-based RSUs and DSUs in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
107

Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Performance stock units
Under the Incentive Plan,Plans, each PSU provides the holder the right to receive upon vesting one1 share of our common stock for equity-based awards, and the equivalent in cash for liability-based awards, subject to aan adjustment based on market and/or performance adjustment.conditions. The awards vest after a period of up to 40 months upon which they are settled. No awards vest when the minimum thresholds are not achieved. We withhold shares in respect of applicable taxes. The fair value of PSUs granted was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using the following assumptions:
202020192018
Expected volatility57% - 77%56% - 58%57 %
Risk-free interest rate0.11% - 2.99%1.58% - 1.70%2.73% - 2.99%
The activity of nonvested PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, was as follows:
 
Number of
Units
Weighted-
Average Fair
Value at Grant
Date
Balance as of December 31, 20162,345,420
 $6.71
 
Granted295,455
  8.63
 
Forfeited(49,479)  5.67
 
Balance as of December 31, 2017 (1)

2,591,396
 $6.94
 
(1)    Includes 387,294 liability-based awards.

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Number of Units
Equity-Based AwardsLiability-Based AwardsTotalWeighted-
Average Fair
Value at Grant
Date
Balance as of December 31, 20192,353,420 1,127,021 3,480,441 $5.99 
Granted688,797 700,693 1,389,490 $4.09 
Vested(1,271,527)(420,137)(1,691,664)$4.22 
Performance adjustment103,703 34,265 137,968 $3.95 
Forfeited(78,990)(130,515)(209,505)$5.38 
Balance as of December 31, 20201,795,403 1,311,327 3,106,730 $6.05 
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of all PSUs granted in 20162019 and 2015,2018, was $3.95$5.29 and $7.54,$9.01, respectively. The total fair value of PSUs vested in 2020, 2019 and 2018, was $5 million, $7 million and $2 million, respectively. We paid $1 million and $1 million for liability-based PSUs in 2020 and 2019, respectively. There was 0 cash paid for liability-based PSUs in 2018.
Deferred Compensation Plan
In 2011, the board of directors adopted the Resolute Forest Products Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DeferredDeferred Compensation Plan”Plan), which allows non-employee directors to surrender 50% or 100% of their cash fees in exchange for DSUs or RSUs, as applicable, based on the director’s country of residency. The number of awards issued pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan is based on 110% of the fees earned, resulting in a 10% premium incentive.
Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each RSU and DSU granted provides the holder the right to receive payment in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of one1 share of our common stock upon vesting. The awards have a nonforfeitable right or vest ratably over a period of three years, as applicable, and are settled with cash ratably over a period of three years or upon separation from the board of directors, as applicable, based on the director’s country of residency. All of our outstanding stock incentive awards pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan were accounted for as liability awards.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, share-basedShare-based compensation expense under the Deferred Compensation Planplan for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018 was $1$2 million and less than $1 million, respectively. There was a $1 million reversal in share-based compensation expense for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2019.
RSUs and DSUs outstanding under the Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019 were 183,046481,056 and 127,521,330,900, respectively. The total fair value of RSUs and DSUs vested in each of 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018 was less than $1 million.million, less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively.
108
Note 19. Operating Leases and Purchase Obligations
We lease office and manufacturing premises, and office equipment under operating leases for which total expense was $8 million in 2017, $9 million in 2016 and $8 million in 2015. In the normal course of business, we have also entered into various supply agreements, guarantees, water rights agreements, purchase commitments and harvesting rights agreements (for land that we manage for which we make payments to various Canadian provinces based on the amount of timber harvested).
As of December 31, 2017, the commitments for purchase obligations and future minimum rental payments under operating leases were as follows:
(In millions)
Purchase Obligations (1)
Operating
Leases
2018$81
 $7
 
2019 54
  6
 
2020 54
  6
 
2021 45
  5
 
2022 4
  3
 
Thereafter 30
  8
 
 $268
 $35
 
(1)
Includes energy purchase obligations of $209 million through 2022 for certain of our pulp and paper mills.


Table of Contents

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 20.21. Segment Information
We manage our business based on the products we manufacture. Accordingly, our reportable segments correspond to our principal product lines: market pulp, tissue, wood products, and paper. As of the second quarter of 2020, the results from our newsprint and specialty papers.papers operations have been combined to form the paper reportable segment. This better reflects management’s internal analysis, given the diminishing percentage newsprint and specialty papers represent in our product portfolio. Comparative year information has been modified to conform to this revised segment presentation.
None of the income or loss items following “Operating income (loss)”income” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations are allocated to our segments, since those items are reviewed separately by management. For the same reason, closure costs, impairment and other related charges, inventory write-downs related to closures, start-up costs, gains and losses on disposition of assets, acquisition-related costs, certain components of pension and OPEB costs and credits, as well as other discretionary charges or credits are not allocated to our segments. We allocate depreciation and amortization expense to our segments, although the related fixed assets and amortizable intangible assets are not allocated to segment assets. Additionally, all selling, general and administrative expenses are allocated to our segments, with the exception of certain discretionary charges and credits, which we present under “corporate and other.”
In each of 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, no assets were identifiable by segment and reviewed by management.
In the first quarter of 2017, we changed our presentation of segment operating income to reallocate the amortization of prior service credits component of pension and OPEB costs from the reportable segments to “corporate and other.” Current service costs will continue to be allocated to the reportable segments. This approach is consistent with the indicators management uses internally to evaluate performance, including those used by the chief operating decision maker. Prior service amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation.
Information about certain segment data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, was as follows:
(In millions)
Market
Pulp (1)
Tissue (2)
Wood
Products (3)
PaperSegment
Total
Corporate
and Other
Total
Sales
2020$668 $173 $1,025 $934 $2,800 $0 $2,800 
2019$797 $165 $616 $1,345 $2,923 $$2,923 
2018$1,085 $130 $823 $1,718 $3,756 $$3,756 
Depreciation and amortization
2020$24 $18 $43 $69 $154 $15 $169 
2019$23 $18 $34 $72 $147 $20 $167 
2018$27 $15 $32 $113 $187 $25 $212 
Operating income (loss)
2020$(1)$(1)$276 $(46)$228 $(129)$99 
2019$39 $(16)$(6)$82 $99 $(82)$17 
2018$172 $(30)$169 $114 $425 $(46)$379 
Capital expenditures
2020$15 $8 $26 $23 $72 $6 $78 
2019$29 $$23 $43 $103 $10 $113 
2018$53 $27 $37 $34 $151 $$155 
(1)Inter-segment sales of $28 million, $36 million and $39 million, were excluded from market pulp sales for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Effective July 1, 2019, these sales were transacted either at the lowest market price of the previous month or cost. Previously, these sales were transacted at cost.
(2)The operating results of our Calhoun tissue operations, previously recorded under “corporate and other,” have been recorded in our tissue segment since April 1, 2018.
(3)Wood products sales to our joint ventures, which are transacted at arm’s length negotiated prices, were $28 million, $22 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
109

(In millions)
Market
Pulp (1)
Tissue (2)
Wood
Products (3)
Newsprint
Specialty
Papers
Segment
Total
Corporate
and Other
Total
Sales
2017$911
 $81
 $797
 $842
 $882
 $3,513
 $
 $3,513
 
2016 836
  89
  596
  1,009
  1,015
  3,545
  
  3,545
 
2015 889
  11
  536
  1,105
  1,104
  3,645
  
  3,645
 
Depreciation and amortization
2017$31
 $5
 $33
 $66
 $45
 $180
 $24
 $204
 
2016 37
  5
  31
  74
  45
  192
  14
  206
 
2015 53
  1
  37
  64
  71
  226
  11
  237
 
Operating income (loss)
2017$79
 $(6) $186
 $(23) $(9) $227
 $(178) $49
 
2016 37
  (10)  69
  (16)  19
  99
  (125)  (26) 
2015 71
  (1)  2
  (25)  23
  70
  (289)  (219) 
Capital expenditures
2017$12
 $101
 $9
 $6
 $20
 $148
 $16
 $164
 
2016 20
  156
  23
  2
  23
  224
  25
  249
 
2015 60
  41
  43
  10
  13
  167
  18
  185
 
Table of Contents
(1)
Inter-segment sales of $36 million, $33 million and $20 million, which are transacted at cost, were excluded from market pulp sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Tissue capital expenditures consisted almost entirely of expenditures for the tissue manufacturing and converting facility in Calhoun.
(3)
Wood products sales to our joint ventures, which are transacted at arm’s length negotiated prices, were $20 million, $17 million and $20 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Sales are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. No single customer, related or otherwise, accounted for 10% or more of our 2017, 20162020, 2019 or 20152018 consolidated sales. No country in the “Other countries” group in the table below exceeded 2% of consolidated sales. Sales by country for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, were as follows:
(In millions)202020192018
U.S.$2,038 $2,026 $2,581 
Foreign countries:
Canada463 405 513 
Mexico63 87 148 
Other countries236 405 514 
 762 897 1,175 
 $2,800 $2,923 $3,756 
(In millions)2017  2016  2015  
United States$2,387
 $2,464
 $2,421
 
Foreign countries:         
Canada 517
  428
  476
 
Mexico 126
  126
  150
 
Other countries 483
  527
  598
 
  1,126
  1,081
  1,224
 
 $3,513
 $3,545
 $3,645
 
Certain long-livedLong-lived assets by country (comprised of fixed assets, net, water rights, net, energy contracts, net and other assets) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, were as follows:
(In millions)20202019
U.S.$666 $540 
Canada898 1,028 
 $1,564 $1,568 
110
(In millions)2017  2016  
United States$790
 $795
 
Foreign countries:      
Canada 1,143
  1,259
 
South Korea 
  8
 
  1,143
  1,267
 
 $1,933
 $2,062
 

Table of Contents


RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 21. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
The following information is presented in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X and the public information requirements of Rule 144 promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, as amended, in connection with Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s 2023 Notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of our 100% owned material U.S. subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The 2023 Notes are not guaranteed by our foreign subsidiaries (the “Non-guarantor Subsidiaries”).
The following condensed consolidating financial information sets forth the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, for the Parent, the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis, and the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries also on a combined basis. The condensed consolidating financial information reflects the investments of the Parent in the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-guarantor Subsidiaries, as well as the investments of the Guarantor Subsidiaries in the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries, using the equity method of accounting. The principal consolidating adjustments are entries to eliminate the investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(In millions)Parent
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Sales$
 $2,849
 $2,264
 $(1,600) $3,513
 
Costs and expenses:               
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs 
  2,702
  1,467
  (1,595)  2,574
 
Depreciation and amortization 
  74
  130
  
  204
 
Distribution costs 
  159
  291
  (8)  442
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 30
  69
  73
  
  172
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 
  76
  11
  
  87
 
Net gain on disposition of assets 
  
  (15)  
  (15) 
Operating (loss) income (30)  (231)  307
  3
  49
 
Interest expense (95)  (9)  (13)  68
  (49) 
Other income (expense), net 
  76
  (2)  (68)  6
 
Equity in income of subsidiaries 41
  43
  
  (84)  
 
(Loss) income before income taxes (84)  (121)  292
  (81)  6
 
Income tax benefit (provision) 
  2
  (85)  (1)  (84) 
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests (84)  (119)  207
  (82)  (78) 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 
  
  (6)  
  (6) 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(84) $(119) $201
 $(82) $(84) 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(109) $(135) $192
 $(57) $(109) 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(In millions)Parent
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Sales$
 $2,907
 $2,145
 $(1,507) $3,545
 
Costs and expenses:               
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs 
  2,745
  1,471
  (1,500)  2,716
 
Depreciation and amortization 
  78
  128
  
  206
 
Distribution costs 
  168
  273
  (1)  440
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 20
  61
  68
  
  149
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 
  38
  24
  
  62
 
Net gain on disposition of assets 
  
  (2)  
  (2) 
Operating (loss) income (20)  (183)  183
  (6)  (26) 
Interest expense (80)  
  (10)  52
  (38) 
Other income, net 
  57
  2
  (52)  7
 
Equity in income of subsidiaries 19
  24
  
  (43)  
 
(Loss) income before income taxes (81)  (102)  175
  (49)  (57) 
Income tax provision 
  (11)  (10)  2
  (19) 
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests (81)  (113)  165
  (47)  (76) 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 
  
  (5)  
  (5) 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(81) $(113) $160
 $(47) $(81) 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(249) $(197) $73
 $124
 $(249) 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
(In millions)ParentGuarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Sales$
 $2,975
 $2,223
 $(1,553) $3,645
 
Costs and expenses:               
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and distribution costs 
  2,780
  1,601
  (1,555)  2,826
 
Depreciation and amortization 
  93
  144
  
  237
 
Distribution costs 
  168
  293
  (1)  460
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 19
  55
  86
  
  160
 
Closure costs, impairment and other related charges 
  176
  5
  
  181
 
Operating (loss) income (19)  (297)  94
  3
  (219) 
Interest expense (75)  
  (12)  46
  (41) 
Other income, net 
  37
  13
  (46)  4
 
Equity in (loss) income of subsidiaries (163)  20
  
  143
  
 
(Loss) income before income taxes (257)  (240)  95
  146
  (256) 
Income tax benefit (provision) 
  36
  (34)  (1)  1
 
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests (257)  (204)  61
  145
  (255) 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 
  
  (2)  
  (2) 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(257) $(204) $59
 $145
 $(257) 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(126) $(169) $155
 $14
 $(126) 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2017
(In millions)Parent
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $3
 $3
 $
 $6
 
Accounts receivable, net 
  319
  160
  
  479
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates 
  535
  729
  (1,264)  
 
Inventories, net 
  243
  292
  (9)  526
 
Note, advance and interest receivable from parent 
  538
  
  (538)  
 
Notes and interest receivable from affiliates 
  32
  
  (32)  
 
Other current assets 
  16
  17
  
  33
 
Total current assets 
  1,686
  1,201
  (1,843)  1,044
 
Fixed assets, net 
  692
  1,024
  
  1,716
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net 
  13
  52
  
  65
 
Goodwill 
  81
  
  
  81
 
Deferred income tax assets 
  1
  1,073
  2
  1,076
 
Notes receivable from parent 
  330
  
  (330)  
 
Note receivable from affiliate 
  116
  
  (116)  
 
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates 3,939
  2,111
  
  (6,050)  
 
Other assets 
  98
  67
  
  165
 
Total assets$3,939
 $5,128
 $3,417
 $(8,337) $4,147
 
Liabilities and equity               
Current liabilities:               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$4
 $171
 $245
 $
 $420
 
Current portion of long-term debt 
  1
  
  
  1
 
Accounts payable to affiliates 536
  728
  
  (1,264)  
 
Note, advance and interest payable to subsidiaries 538
  
  
  (538)  
 
Notes and interest payable to affiliate 
  
  32
  (32)  
 
Total current liabilities 1,078
  900
  277
  (1,834)  421
 
Long-term debt, net of current portion 592
  196
  
  
  788
 
Note payable to subsidiary 330
  
  
  (330)  
 
Note payable to affiliate 
  
  116
  (116)  
 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations 
  378
  879
  
  1,257
 
Deferred income tax liabilities 
  
  13
  
  13
 
Other liabilities 5
  24
  39
  
  68
 
Total liabilities 2,005
  1,498
  1,324
  (2,280)  2,547
 
Total equity 1,934
  3,630
  2,093
  (6,057)  1,600
 
Total liabilities and equity$3,939
 $5,128
 $3,417
 $(8,337) $4,147
 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2016
(In millions)Parent
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $2
 $33
 $
 $35
 
Accounts receivable, net 
  283
  158
  
  441
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates 
  479
  395
  (874)  
 
Inventories, net 
  259
  323
  (12)  570
 
Note, advance and interest receivable from parent 
  373
  
  (373)  
 
Notes and interest receivable from affiliates 
  54
  
  (54)  
 
Other current assets 
  16
  19
  
  35
 
Total current assets 
  1,466
  928
  (1,313)  1,081
 
Fixed assets, net 
  733
  1,109
  
  1,842
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net 
  14
  56
  
  70
 
Goodwill 
  81
  
  
  81
 
Deferred income tax assets 
  
  1,036
  3
  1,039
 
Note receivable from parent 
  443
  
  (443)  
 
Note receivable from affiliate 
  109
  
  (109)  
 
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates 3,918
  2,068
  
  (5,986)  
 
Other assets 
  62
  102
  
  164
 
Total assets$3,918
 $4,976
 $3,231
 $(7,848) $4,277
 
Liabilities and equity               
Current liabilities:               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$5
 $222
 $239
 $
 $466
 
Current portion of long-term debt 
  1
  
  
  1
 
Accounts payable to affiliates 479
  395
  
  (874)  
 
Note, advance and interest payable to subsidiaries 373
  
  
  (373)  
 
Notes and interest payable to affiliate 
  
  54
  (54)  
 
Total current liabilities 857
  618
  293
  (1,301)  467
 
Long-term debt, net of current portion 590
  171
  
  
  761
 
Note payable to subsidiary 443
  
  
  (443)  
 
Note payable to affiliate 
  
  109
  (109)  
 
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations 
  397
  884
  
  1,281
 
Deferred income tax liabilities 
  1
  1
  
  2
 
Other liabilities 
  24
  31
  
  55
 
Total liabilities 1,890
  1,211
  1,318
  (1,853)  2,566
 
Total equity 2,028
  3,765
  1,913
  (5,995)  1,711
 
Total liabilities and equity$3,918
 $4,976
 $3,231
 $(7,848) $4,277
 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(In millions)ParentGuarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities$
 $125
 $33
 $
 $158
 
Cash flows from investing activities:               
Cash invested in fixed assets 
  (116)  (48)  
  (164) 
Disposition of assets 
  
  21
  
  21
 
Increase in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper 
  (22)  
  
  (22) 
Increase in countervailing and anti-dumping duty cash deposits on softwood lumber 
  (26)  
  
  (26) 
Increase in restricted cash, net 
  
  (3)  
  (3) 
Decrease in deposit requirements for letters of credit, net 
  
  2
  
  2
 
Decrease in notes receivable from affiliate, net 
  22
  
  (22)  
 
Net cash used in investing activities 
  (142)  (28)  (22)  (192) 
Cash flows from financing activities:               
Net borrowings under revolving credit facilities 
  19
  
  
  19
 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in Donohue Malbaie Inc. 
  
  (15)  
  (15) 
Issuance of long-term debt 
  
  
  
  
 
Payments of debt 
  (1)  
  
  (1) 
Payments of financing and credit facility fees 
  
  
  
  
 
Decrease in notes payable to affiliate, net 
  
  (22)  22
  
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 
  18
  (37)  22
  3
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
  
  2
  
  2
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 
  1
  (30)  
  (29) 
Cash and cash equivalents:               
Beginning of year 
  2
  33
  
  35
 
End of year$
 $3
 $3
 $
 $6
 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(In millions)ParentGuarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities$
 $30
 $51
 $
 $81
 
Cash flows from investing activities:               
Cash invested in fixed assets 
  (179)  (70)  
  (249) 
Acquisition of a sawmill in Senneterre 
  
  (6)  
  (6) 
Disposition of assets 
  
  5
  
  5
 
Increase in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper 
  (23)  
  
  (23) 
Increase in notes receivable from affiliate 
  (8)  
  8
  
 
Net cash used in investing activities 
  (210)  (71)  8
  (273) 
Cash flows from financing activities:               
Net borrowings under revolving credit facilities 
  125
  
  
  125
 
Issuance of long-term debt 
  46
  
  
  46
 
Payments of debt 
  (1)  
  
  (1) 
Payments of financing and credit facility fees 
  (1)  
  
  (1) 
Increase in notes payable to affiliate 
  
  8
  (8)  
 
Net cash provided by financing activities 
  169
  8
  (8)  169
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
  
  
  
  
 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 
  (11)  (12)  
  (23) 
Cash and cash equivalents:               
Beginning of year 
  13
  45
  
  58
 
End of year$
 $2
 $33
 $
 $35
 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
(In millions)ParentGuarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$
 $151
 $(13) $
 $138
 
Cash flows from investing activities:               
Cash invested in fixed assets 
  (101)  (84)  
  (185) 
Acquisition of Atlas Tissue, including cash overdraft acquired 
  (159)  
  
  (159) 
Increase in countervailing duty cash deposits on supercalendered paper 
  (4)  
  
  (4) 
Increase in deposit requirements for letters of credit, net 
  
  (4)  
  (4) 
Investment in common stock of subsidiary 
  (234)  
  234
  
 
Advance to parent 
  (59)  
  59
  
 
Decrease of notes receivable from affiliates 
  164
  
  (164)  
 
Net cash used in investing activities 
  (393)  (88)  129
  (352) 
Cash flows from financing activities:               
Payments of financing and credit facility fees 
  (2)  (1)  
  (3) 
Purchases of treasury stock (59)  
  
  
  (59) 
Issuance of common stock 
  
  234
  (234)  
 
Advance to subsidiary 59
  
  
  (59)  
 
Decrease in notes payable to affiliate 
  
  (164)  164
  
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities 
  (2)  69
  (129)  (62) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 
  
  (3)  
  (3) 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 
  (244)  (35)  
  (279) 
Cash and cash equivalents:               
Beginning of year 
  257
  80
  
  337
 
End of year$
 $13
 $45
 $
 $58
 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 22. Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
2020
(In millions, except per share amounts)First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth QuarterYear
Sales$689 $612 $730 $769 $2,800 
Operating (loss) income$(8)$6 $97 $4 $99 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$(1)$6 $57 $(52)$10 
Basic net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$(0.01)$0.07 $0.66 $(0.63)$0.12 
Diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$(0.01)$0.07 $0.66 $(0.63)$0.12 
2019
(In millions, except per share amounts)First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth QuarterYear
Sales$795 $755 $705 $668 $2,923 
Operating income (loss)$64 $40 $(18)$(69)$17 
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc.$42 $25 $(43)$(71)$(47)
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$0.45 $0.27 $(0.47)$(0.79)$(0.51)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders$0.45 $0.27 $(0.47)$(0.79)$(0.51)
Year ended December 31, 2017
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Year
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Sales$872
 $858
 $885
 $898
 $3,513
 
Operating (loss) income (6)  (47)  48
  54
  49
 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (47)  (74)  24
  13
  (84) 
Basic net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.52)  (0.82)  0.27
  0.14
  (0.93) 
Diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.52)  (0.82)  0.26
  0.14
  (0.93) 
Year ended December 31, 2016
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Year
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Sales$877
 $891
 $888
 $889
 $3,545
 
Operating (loss) income 
  (18)  10
  (18)  (26) 
Net (loss) income attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. (8)  (42)  14
  (45)  (81) 
Basic net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.09)  (0.47)  0.16
  (0.50)  (0.90) 
Diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to Resolute Forest Products Inc. common shareholders (0.09)  (0.47)  0.15
  (0.50)  (0.90) 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 23. Subsequent EventEvents
The following significant eventevents occurred subsequent to December 31, 2017:2020:
On August 9, 2017, a countervailing and anti-dumping duty petition was filed with Commerce andFebruary 2, 2021, we completed the ITC by a U.S. UGW paper producer requesting that the U.S. government impose countervailing and anti-dumping duties on Canadian-origin UGW paper exported to the U.S. OneOffering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of our subsidiaries was identified4.875% senior notes due 2026 at an issue price of 100%. The 2026 Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by all of our current and, subject to certain conditions, future material wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries. The Notes mature on March 1, 2026, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased, and will be recorded in “Long-term debt” in our consolidated balance sheet at their fair value of $300 million. Interest on the petition as being a Canadian exporting producernotes is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of UGW papereach year, beginning on September 1, 2021.
We used the net proceeds of the Offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all of the U.S. and was selected as a mandatory respondent to be investigated by Commerce in both the countervailing and anti-dumping duty investigations. On January 9, 2018, Commerce announced its preliminary determinations in its countervailing duty investigation on Canadian-origin UGW paper exported to the U.S. As a result, since January 16, 2018, we have been required to pay cash deposits to the U.S.outstanding $375 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior notes due 2023, at a rateprice of 4.42% for estimated countervailing duties on our U.S. imports100% of the UGW paper produced at our Canadian mills,aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. In connection with the exceptionredemption of SC paper, which isall $375 million aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes (the “Redemption”), we placed the net proceeds of the closing of the Offering, together with additional cash, into trust for the benefit of the holders of the 2023 Notes. The Redemption occurred on February 18, 2021.
Effective January 21, 2021, we reduced the commitment under the Canadian tranche of our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility by $50 million, to $250 million, resulting in an aggregate commitment of $450 million, subject to distinct countervailing duties, as further discussed in Note 16, “Commitments and Contingencies – Legal matters – Countervailing duty investigation on SC paper.” The rate and the requirement to pay cash deposits do not have retroactive effect. Commerce has not yet issued its preliminary determination in the anti-dumping investigation.borrowing base limitations.
The preliminary 4.42% rate can remain in effect for up to four months. If the ITC does not issue an affirmative material injury determination before the four-month period lapses, then we would not be required to pay deposits for countervailing duties on the affected UGW paper imports until the ITC makes an affirmative material injury determination. If as a result
111

Table of such a determination Commerce imposes a countervailing duty order subjecting us to a countervailing duty deposit requirement on any of our affected UGW paper U.S. imports, then we would be required to resume making cash deposits at the rate set in the order until Commerce sets a countervailing duty rate in a subsequent administrative review. Based on the 4.42% rate and our current operating parameters, cash deposits on our imports of the affected UGW paper to the U.S. would be approximately $6 million for the initial four-month period, and as high as $20 million per year if the rate were to remain in effect continuously. We are not presently able to determine the ultimate resolution of this matter, but we believe it is not probable that we will ultimately be assessed with significant duties, if any, on our Canadian-produced UGW that is exported to the U.S. Accordingly, we do not expect this announcement to have a material impact on our results of operations.Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Resolute Forest Products Inc.
Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Resolute Forest Products Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,(loss) income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”)(COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Financial Statements and Assessment of Internal Control over financial reporting.Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
DefinitionAs described in Management’s Report on Financial Statements and limitationsAssessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded the subsidiaries acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. on February 1, 2020, the business of which consists mainly in the operation of three sawmills and related assets in Cross City (Florida) and in Glenwood and El Dorado (Arkansas), (the US Sawmill Business) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2020. We have also excluded the US Sawmill Business from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The US Sawmill Business consists of wholly‑owned subsidiaries whose total assets and total sales excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent $256 million and $137 million, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.
An entity’s
112

Table of Contents
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. An entity’sA company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the entity;company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the entitycompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the entity;company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the entity’scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Long‑lived Assets Impairment Assessment for an asset group for which management identified impairment indicators
As described in notes 2, 10, 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated long‑lived assets balance was $1,564 million as of December 31, 2020 and comprised $1,441 million fixed assets, net, $63 million amortizable intangible assets, net and $60 million operating lease right‑of‑use assets. Management reviews long‑lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset group may no longer be recoverable. For asset groups that are held and used, the asset group represents the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other asset groups. The recoverability of an asset group that is held and used is tested by comparing the carrying value of the asset group to the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by that asset group. The principal assumptions used by management to estimate these undiscounted future cash flows include, but are not limited to, periods of operation, projections of product pricing, production levels and sales volumes, product costs, market supply and demand, foreign exchange rates, inflation, and projected capital spending.If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount by which the asset group’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. No impairment charge was required in the current year.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to long‑lived assets impairment assessment for an asset group for which management identified impairment indicators is a critical audit matter are (i) the high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the recoverability of the asset group being tested for impairment due to the significant judgment required by management when developing the undiscounted future cash flows and (ii) significant audit effort in evaluating the principal assumptions related to the projections of product pricing and sales volumes, product costs and projected capital spending.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s long‑lived assets impairment assessment for an asset group for which management identified impairment indicators, including controls over (i) the development of principal assumptions used in the undiscounted cash flow model and (ii) the determination of the recoverable amount of an asset group for which management identified impairment indicators. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for determining the recoverable amount of the asset group tested for impairment, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the undiscounted cash flow model, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the models and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the principal assumptions used by management, including projections of product pricing and sales volumes, product costs and projected capital spending. Evaluating the reasonableness of the principal assumptions related to projections of product pricing and sales volumes, product costs and projected capital spending involved considering the current and past performance of the asset group tested for impairment, management’s strategic plan, comparing market‑related assumptions used in the model to external market and industry data and whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
113

Table of Contents
Valuation of Fixed Assets acquired related to the US Sawmill Business
As described in notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2020 the Company completed the acquisition of certain subsidiaries, the business of which consisted mainly of three operating sawmills (the US Sawmill Business) for consideration of $173 million paid in cash. Management accounted for this transaction as a business combination using the acquisition method. Under this method, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. Management recorded the acquired fixed assets at an aggregated fair value of $114 million on the date of acquisition based on both cost and market approaches. Management applied significant judgment in estimating the fair value of fixed assets acquired using the cost approach, which involved the use of principal assumptions with respect to estimated replacement and reproduction costs, estimated useful lives, and physical, functional and economic obsolescence at the time of acquisition.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of fixed assets acquired related to the US Sawmill Business is a critical audit matter are (i) the high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in performing procedures relating to the fair value measurement of fixed assets acquired due to the significant amount of judgment required by management when developing the fair value applying the cost approach and (ii) the significant audit effort in evaluating the principal assumptions relating to this estimate, including replacement and reproduction costs, estimated useful lives and physical, functional and economic condition obsolescence at the time of acquisition. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of the acquired fixed assets and controls over the development of the principal assumptions used in the valuation of acquired fixed assets. These procedures also included, among others, (i) reading the securities purchase agreement, (ii) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of the acquired fixed assets using the cost approach, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the models, and (iv) with the assistance of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge, evaluating whether the principal assumptions were reasonable considering consistency with external market and industry data. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were also involved in evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation approach.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP / s.r.l / s.e.n.c.r.l. (1)
Montréal, Canada
Montreal, Canada
March 1, 20182021
(1) CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No.A115888

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

114

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Financial Statements
Management of Resolute Forest Products Inc. is responsible for the preparation of the financial information included in this Form 10-K. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts that are based on the best estimates and judgments of management.
Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
 —pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Resolute Forest Products Inc.;
 —provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
 —provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of Resolute Forest Products Inc. are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of management and directors of Resolute Forest Products Inc.; and
 —provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. Management based this assessment on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management has elected to exclude from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, the subsidiaries acquired from Conifex Timber Inc. on February 1, 2020, the business of which consists mainly in the operation of three sawmills and related assets in Cross City and in Glenwood and El Dorado, included in our consolidated financial statements with sales and assets of $137 million and $256 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2020.Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committeeaudit committee of our Boardboard of Directors.directors.
Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report above.

115

Table of Contents
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Presidentpresident and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2017.2020. Based on that evaluation, the Presidentpresident and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerchief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date in recording, processing, summarizing and timely reporting information required to be disclosed in our reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management has issued its report on internal control over financial reporting, which included management’s assessment that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020. Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting can be found on page 130116 of this Form 10-K. Our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. This report can be found on page 128113 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In connection with the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, there were no changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2017,2020, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
None.

116

Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information appearing under the captions entitled “Management Proposals - Vote on the Election of Directors,” “Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,“Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports,” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 25, 2018 (our “201821, 2021 (or, our “2021 proxy statement”statement), which will be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2020, is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our executive officers is presented in Part I, Item 1, “Business - Executive Officers,” of this Form 10-K.10-K and is incorporated by reference herein.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This code of ethics (which is entitled “CodeCode of Business Conduct”Conduct) and our corporate governance policies are posted on our website at www.resolutefp.com. We intend to satisfy disclosure requirements regarding amendments to or waivers from our code of ethics by posting such information on this website. The charters of the Audit Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation/Nominating and Governance Committee of our Board of Directors are available on our website as well. This information is also available in print free of charge to any person who requests it.
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing under the captions entitled “Executive Compensation,” “Corporate Governance and Board Matters, - Director Compensation”” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our 20182021 proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
117

Table of Contents
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information appearing under the caption entitled “Information on Stock Ownership” in our 20182021 proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017,2020, regarding securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options or pursuant to outstanding stock unit awards, and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plan.plans. The Incentive Plan isPlans are the only compensation planplans with shares authorized.
Plan category(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders3,012,924 (1)$— 2,211,394 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2)
2,043,813 (3)$16.09 (4)— 
Total5,056,737 $16.09 2,211,394 
(1)Includes shares issuable upon the exercise of 1,087,568 RSUs issued under the 2019 Incentive Plan, at a rate of one share per unit. Also includes shares issuable upon the settlement of 1,241,295 PSUs issued under the 2019 Incentive Plan at the maximum payout rate (1,925,356 shares).
(2)The Incentive Plan was approved by the Courts in connection with the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings, and the creditor protection proceedings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, as amended, as applicable.
(3)Includes shares issuable upon the exercise of 912,901 stock options and shares issuable upon the settlement of 416,615 RSUs and DSUs issued under the Incentive Plan, at a rate of one share per unit. Also includes shares issuable upon the settlement of 554,107 PSUs issued under the Incentive Plan at the maximum payout rate (714,297 shares).
(4)The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) represents the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options disclosed in column (a). The stock unit awards do not have an exercise price and are not included in the calculation of the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).
Plan category
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 $
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
6,411,513
(2) 
 15.90
(3) 
1,279,187
 
Total6,411,513
 $15.90
 1,279,187
 
(1)
The Incentive Plan was approved by the Courts in connection with the CCAA Creditor Protection Proceedings, and the creditor protection proceedings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, as amended, as applicable.
(2)
Includes shares issuable upon the exercise of 1,304,541 stock options and shares issuable upon the settlement of 2,266,110 RSUs and DSUs issued under the Incentive Plan, at a rate of one share per unit. Also includes shares issuable upon the settlement of 2,591,396 PSUs issued under the Incentive Plan at the maximum payout rate (2,840,862 shares).
(3)
The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) represents the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options disclosed in column (a). The stock unit awards do not have an exercise price and are not included in the calculation of the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information appearing under the captions entitled “Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters - Director Independence” in our 20182021 proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information appearing under the caption entitled “Management Proposals - Vote on the Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” in our 20182021 proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

118

Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following are filed as a part of this Form 10-K:


(1) The following are included at the indicated page of this Form 10-K:
Page
 
 
(2) Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.Description
Exhibit No.Description
2.1*
3.1*Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement between Resolute FP US Inc., New-Indy Containerboard LLC and New-Indy Catawba LLC, dated December 27, 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.2 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 23, 2019, among Conifex USA Inc., Conifex Holdco LLC, Conifex Timber Inc. and Resolute FP US Inc.(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Resolute Forest ProductProducts Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Resolute Forest Product Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed March 1, 2013, SEC File No. 001-33776).
3.2*
4.1*Description of the Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Indenture, dated as of May 8, 2013,February 2, 2021. among Resolute Forest Products Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed May 10, 2013, SEC File No. 001-33776).
4.2*
4.3*
10.1*
†10.2*

Exhibit No.Description
†10.3*
†10.4*
†10.5*
†10.6*
†10.7*
†10.8*
†10.9*
†10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
†10.13*
†10.14*
†10.15*
†10.16*
†10.17*
†10.18*

Exhibit No.Description
†10.19*
†10.20*
†10.21*
†10.22*
†10.23*
†10.24*
†10.25*
†10.26*
†10.27*
10.28*
†10.29*
10.30*
119

Table of Contents
Exhibit No.Description
Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2019, among Resolute Forest Products Inc., Resolute FP Canada Inc., certain other subsidiaries of Resolute Forest Products Inc. as borrowers or guarantors, various lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as U.S. Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. (through its Canada branch), as Canadian Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2019, SEC file No. 001-33776).
Secured Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility, dated as of November 4, 2020, among Resolute FP Canada Inc., a subsidiary of Resolute Forest Products Inc. as borrower, and Investissement Quebec, as lender.
AbitibiBowater 2010 Canadian DB Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of December 9, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed April 5, 2011, SEC File No. 001-33776).
AbitibiBowater Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 7, 2011, SEC Registration No. 333-171602).
AbitibiBowater Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 7, 2011, SEC Registration No. 333-171602).
AbitibiBowater Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed February 29, 2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
AbitibiBowater Executive Restricted Stock Unit Plan, effective as of April 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed April 5, 2011, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Retirement Compensation Trust Agreement (with Letter of Credit) between AbiBow Canada Inc. and AbitibiBowater Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated and effective as of November 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.39 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed February 29, 2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Agreement Concerning the Pulp and Paper Operations of AbiBow Canada in Ontario, dated November 10, 2010, between Bowater Canadian Forest Products Inc. and Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada and The Province of Ontario (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed April 5, 2011, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Agreement Concerning the Pulp and Paper Operations of AbiBow Canada in Quebec, dated September 13, 2010, between Bowater Canadian Forest Products Inc. and Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada and The Government of Quebec (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.33 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed April 5, 2011, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Offer Letter between Jacques Vachon and AbitibiBowater Inc., dated March 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed May 10, 2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute Forest Products DC Make-up Program, effective January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to AbitibiBowater Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed May 10, 2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute Forest Products Inc. Severance Policy – Chief Executive Officer and Direct Reports, effective as of August 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2012, filed NovemberAugust 9, 2016,2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute Forest Products Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan (previously named the AbitibiBowater Inc. Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan), effective as of April 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, filed November 9, 2012, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers of Resolute Forest Products Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.41 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2012, filed March 1, 2017,2013, SEC File No. 001-33776).
120

Table of Contents
†10.32*Exhibit No.Description
Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.41 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed March 3, 2014, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Offer Letter between Richard Tremblay and Resolute Forest Products Inc., dated February 4, 2014 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.43 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed March 3, 2014, SEC File No. 001-33776).
First Amendment dated February 14, 2014 to the AbitibiBowater 2010 Canadian DB Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of December 9, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.44 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed March 2, 2015, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute FP Canada Inc. and Resolute Forest Products Inc. Security Protocol with respect to the Resolute Forest Products 2010 Canadian DB Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Resolute Canada SERP, amended and restated effective April 11, 2014 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.45 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed March 2, 2015, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers of Resolute Forest Products Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.46 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed March 2, 2015, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Form of Director Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.39 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed March 1, 2017, SEC File No. 001-33776).

Exhibit No.Description
†10.34*
†10.38*
†10.39*
†10.40*
†10.41*
†10.42*
†10.43*
†10.44*
†10.46*
Executive Employment Agreement between Resolute Forest Products Inc. and Yves Laflamme, dated February 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.51 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed March 1, 2018, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Change in Control Agreement between Resolute Forest Products Inc. and Yves Laflamme, dated February 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed March 1, 2018, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Director Compensation Program Chart, dated February 27, 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed March 1, 2018, SEC File No. 001-33776).
121

Table of Contents
Exhibit No.Description
Offer Letter between Remi Lalonde and Resolute Forest Products Inc., dated January 30, 2019 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.46 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Director Cash-Settled Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.47 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Director Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.48 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of First Amendment to the Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Director Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.51 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of First Amendment to the Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
2020 Resolute Forest Products Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan – U.S. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, filed August 10, 2020, SEC File No. 001-33776).
2020 Resolute Forest Products Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan – Canada / International (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, filed August 10, 2020, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Resolute Forest Products Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, filed August 9, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Resolute Forest Products 2019 Equity Incentive Plan Cash Settled Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, filed November 12, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Resolute Forest Products 2019 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Settled Performance Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.49 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 1, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Form of Resolute Forest Products 2019 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Settled Performance Stock Unit Agreement.
Form of Resolute Forest Products 2019 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Settled Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, filed November 12, 2019, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Summary of 20182021 Resolute Forest Products Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from the description in Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 6, 2018,9, 2021, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Offer letter between John Lafave and AbitibiBowater Inc., dated February 14, 2011 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.29 to AbitibiBowater Inc’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed April 5, 2011, SEC File No. 001-33776).
Letter Agreement between Yves Laflamme and Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan Director Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.Inc., dated February 8, 2021.
†10.50**

Exhibit No.Description
†10.51**
Offer Letter between Sylvain A. Girard and Resolute Forest Products Inc. and Yves Laflamme,, dated February 1, 2018.January 15, 2021.
2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Resolute Forest Products Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 5, 2020, SEC Registration No. 333-241026).
†10.53**
†10.54**
21.1**
23.1**Guarantor subsidiaries of the registrant.
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
24.1**
122

Table of Contents
Exhibit No.Description
31.1**
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2**
32.1**
32.2**
101.INS***XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF***XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference.
#Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request; provided, however, that the registrant may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.
This is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Filed with this Form 10-K.
***Interactive data files furnished with this Form 10-K, which represent the following materials from this Form 10-K formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss,(Loss) Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
(b)The above-referenced exhibits are being filed with this Form 10-K.
(c)None.
ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

123


Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
Date: March 1, 20182021By:/s/ Yves LaflammeRemi G. Lalonde
Yves LaflammeRemi G. Lalonde
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Remi G. LalondePresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 1, 2021
Remi G. Lalonde(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Bradley P. Martin*Chairman, DirectorMarch 1, 2021
Bradley P. Martin
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Yves LaflammeRemi G. LalondePresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 1, 2018
Yves Laflamme(Principal Executive Officer)
��
/s/ Bradley P. Martin*Chairman, DirectorMarch 1, 2018
Bradley P. Martin
/s/ Jo-Ann LongworthSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 1, 20182021
Jo-Ann LongworthRemi G. Lalonde(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Hugues DorbanVice President and Chief Accounting OfficerMarch 1, 20182021
Hugues Dorban(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Randall C. Benson*DirectorMarch 1, 20182021
Randall C. Benson
/s/ Suzanne Blanchet*DirectorMarch 1, 2021
Suzanne Blanchet
/s/ Jennifer C. Dolan*DirectorMarch 1, 20182021
Jennifer C. Dolan
/s/ Richard D. Falconer*DirectorMarch 1, 2018
Richard D. Falconer
/s/ Jeffrey A. Hearn*DirectorMarch 1, 2018
Jeffrey A. Hearn
/s/ Alain Rhéaume*DirectorMarch 1, 20182021
Alain Rhéaume
/s/ Michael S. Rousseau*DirectorMarch 1, 20182021
Michael S. Rousseau
* Jo-Ann Longworth,Remi G. Lalonde, by signing herhis name hereto, does sign this document on behalf of the persons indicated above pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such persons that are filed herewith as Exhibit 24.1.
By:/s/ Jo-Ann LongworthRemi G. Lalonde
Jo-Ann Longworth,Remi G. Lalonde, Attorney-in-Fact


138
124