UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-K



(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172022
 
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from __________________ to __________________
 
Commission File Number  001-33572


Bank of Marin Bancorp
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
California
20-8859754
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  incorporation or organization)  (IRS Employer Identification No.)
504 Redwood Blvd. Suite 100NovatoCA94947
504 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 100, Novato, CA 94947
(Address of principal executive office)(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (415) 763-4520


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:


None


Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

   Common Stock, No Par Value,
and attached Share Purchase RightsNASDAQ Capital Market
(Title of each class)classTrading symbol(Name of each exchange on which registered)registered
   Common Stock, No Par ValueBMRCThe Nasdaq Stock Market
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes   o         No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrantregistrant is not required to file reportsreports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes   o         No  x


Note - checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under these sections.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  x                   No  o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  x                   No  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.


x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filero
Accelerated filerx
Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.            

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).                                             
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Yes   o         No  x
 
As of June 30, 2017,2022, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates,non-affiliates, based upon the closing price per share of the registrant's common stock as reported by the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, was approximately $396$482 million. For the purpose of this response, directors and certain officers of the Registrant are considered the affiliates at that date.


As of February 28, 2018,2023, there were 6,970,44616,056,334 shares of common stock outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 22, 201823, 2023 are incorporated by reference into Part III.








TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I
Page-Page-44
Forward-Looking Statements
Page-Page-44
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
Page-Page-44
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Executive SummaryCritical Accounting Estimates
Critical Accounting PoliciesRESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Financial Highlights
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSExecutive Summary
Net Interest Income
Provision for LoanCredit Losses
Non-Interest Income
Non-Interest Expense
Provision for Income Taxes
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Investment Securities
Loans
Allowance for LoanCredit Losses
Other Assets
Deposits
Borrowings
Deferred Compensation Obligations
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and CommitmentsCapital Adequacy
Liquidity and Capital AdequacyResources
Liquidity
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Consolidated Statements of Condition
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2: Investment Securities
Note 3: Loans and Allowance for LoanCredit Losses
2


Note 4: Bank Premises and Equipment
Note 5: Bank Owned Life Insurance
Note 6: Deposits
Note 7: Borrowings
Note 8: Stockholders' Equity and Stock Plans
Note 9: Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
Note 10: Benefit Plans
Note 11: Income Taxes
Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies
Note 13: Concentrations of Credit Risk
Note 14: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Note 15: Regulatory Matters
Note 16: Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Note 17: Condensed Bank of Marin Bancorp Parent Only Financial Statements
Note 18: AcquisitionMerger
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9C.
PART IIIDISCLOSURES REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
PART III
Page-104
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
SIGNATURES

3



PART I       


Forward-Looking Statements
 
This discussion of financial resultsAnnual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the "1933 Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "1934 Act"). Those sections of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act provide a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their financial performance so long as they provide meaningful, cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ significantly from projected results.
 
Our forward-looking statements include descriptions of plans or objectives of Managementmanagement for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of revenues, earnings or other measures of economic performance. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate" or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs preceded by "will," "would," "should," "could" or "may."
 
Forward-looking statements are based on Management'smanagement's current expectations regarding economic, legislative, and regulatory issues and the successful integration of acquisitions that may affect ourimpact Bancorp's earnings in future periods. A number of factors, many of which are beyond Management’s control,Factors that could cause future results to vary materially from current Management expectations. Such factorsmanagement expectations include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and the economic uncertainty in the United States and abroad, including economic or other disruptions to financial markets caused by acts of terrorism, war or other conflicts such as Russia's military action in Ukraine, impacts from inflation, supply change disruptions, changes in interest rates (including the actions taken by the Federal Reserve to control inflation), California's unemployment rate, deposit flows, real estate values, and expected future cash flows on loans and securities; costs or effects of acquisitions; competition; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulation (including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017);regulation; natural disasters (such as the recent wildfires and earthquakes in our area); adverse weather conditions; interruptions of utility service in our markets for sustained periods; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors (including external fraud and cyber-securitycybersecurity threats) affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.services; and successful integration of acquisitions.


Important factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially differ from those expressed in our prior forward-looking statements are detailed in ITEM 1A. 1A, Risk Factors section of this report. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertakeBancorp undertakes no obligation to updaterelease publicly the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect circumstancesevents or eventscircumstances that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


ITEM 11.        BUSINESS


Bank of Marin (the “Bank”) was incorporated in August 1989, received its charter from the California Superintendent of Banks (now the California Department of Business OversightFinancial Protection and Innovation or "DBO""DFPI") and commenced operations in January 1990. The Bank is an insured bank by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). On July 1, 2007 (the “Effective Date”), a bank holding company reorganization was completed whereby Bank of Marin Bancorp (“Bancorp”("Bancorp") became the parent holding company forwas formed in 2007 and the Bank thebecame its sole and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bancorp. On the Effective Date,when each outstanding share of Bank of Marin common stock was converted intoexchanged for one share of Bank of Marin Bancorp common stock. Bancorp is listed at NASDAQon the Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol BMRC, which was formerly used by the Bank. Prior to the Effective Date, the Bank filed reports and proxy statements with the FDIC pursuant to Section 12 of the 1934 Act.BMRC. Upon formation of the holding company, Bancorp became subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and reporting and examination requirements by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve"). Bancorp files periodic reports and proxy statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


References in this report to “Bancorp” mean Bank of Marin Bancorp, parent holding company for the Bank. References to “we,” “our,” “us” mean the holding company and the Bank that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.


Virtually all of our business is conducted through Bancorp's subsidiary, Bank of Marin, which is headquartered in Novato, California. In addition to our headquarters and a regional office in the Greater Sacramento region, we operate twenty-three31 retail branches and 8 commercial banking offices inacross 10 counties - Alameda, Amador, Contra Costa, Marin, Sonoma,Napa, Placer, Sacramento, San Francisco, NapaSan Mateo and Alameda counties,Sonoma - with a strong emphasis on supporting the
4


local communities. Our customer base is made upcomprised of business, not-for-profit and personal banking relationships from the communities near the branch office locations.within our Northern California footprint. Our business banking focus is on small to medium-sized businesses, professionalsnot-for-profit organizations, and not-for-profit organizations.commercial real estate investors.


We offer a broad rangesuite of commercialbusiness and retail deposit and lending programspersonal financial products designed to meet the needs of our target markets.customers. Our lending categories include commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans (including small business loans), construction financing, consumer loans, and home equity lines of credit. Merchant card services are available for our business customers. Through third partythird-party vendors, we offer merchant and payroll services, a consumer Visa®credit card product combined with a rewards program to our customers, a Business Visa® program, an American Express® credit card program, acommercial equipment leasing program for commercial equipment financing, and cashcredit cards. Other products and services include payment solutions (e.g., mobile deposit and Zelle®) and treasury management sweep services.


We offer a variety of personal and business checking and savings accounts, and a number of time deposit alternatives, including time certificates of deposit, Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”), Health Savings Accounts ("HSA"), Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® ("CDARS"), Insured Cash Sweep® ("ICS"), and Demand Deposit MarketplaceSM ("DDM Sweep") accounts. CDARS, ICS and DDM Sweep accounts are networks through which we offer full FDIC insurance coverage in excess of the regulatory maximum by placing deposits in multiple banks participating in the networks. We also offer deposit options including mobile deposit, remote deposit capture, Automated Clearing House services (“ACH”), services, wire transfers, and image lockbox services. A valet pick-up service is available for non-cash deposits to our professional and business clients.


Other products and services include Apple Pay®, Samsung Pay®, Android Pay®, SurePayroll®, Positive Pay fraud detection tool, and cash management solutions including Cash Vault and SafePoint.

Automated teller machines (“ATM's”) are available at most retail branch locations. Our ATM network is linked to the PLUS, CIRRUS and NYCE networks, as well as to a network of nation-wide surcharge-free ATM's called MoneyPass.MoneyPass®. We also offer our depositors 24-hour access to their accounts by telephone and through our internet and mobiledigital banking services available to personal and business account holders.


We offer Wealth Management and Trust Services (“WMTS”), which include customized investment portfolio management, financial planning, trust administration, estate settlement and custody services. We also offer 401(k) plan services to small and medium-sized businesses through a third partythird-party vendor.


We make international banking services available to our customers indirectly through other financial institutions with whom we have correspondent banking relationships.


We hold no patents, licenses (other than licenses required by the appropriate banking regulatory agencies), franchises or concessions.  The Bank has registered the service marks "The Spirit of Marin",Marin," the words “Bank of Marin”,Marin,” the Bank of Marin logo, and the Bank of Marin tagline, “Committed to your business and our community” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. In addition, Bancorp has registered the service marks for the words “Bank of Marin Bancorp” and for the Bank of Marin Bancorp logo with the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

All service marks registered by Bancorp or the Bank are registered on the United States Patent & Trademark Office Principal Register, with the exception of the words "Bank of Marin Bancorp" which is registered on the United States Patent & Trademark Office Supplemental Register.


Market Area


Our primary market area consists ofencompasses Alameda, Amador, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Placer, Sacramento, San Francisco, Napa,San Mateo and Sonoma and Alameda counties. Our customer base is primarily made up of business, not-for-profit and personal banking relationships within these market areas. As of December 31, 2022, the majority of our deposits were in Marin, Sacramento and southern Sonoma counties, and approximately 60% of our deposits were from businesses and 40% from consumers.


As discussed in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report, in November 2017,August 2021, we expanded our presence in Napa CountyAmador, Placer, Sacramento and Sonoma counties through the acquisition of American River Bankshares and its subsidiary American River Bank of Napa, N.A. This resultedresulting in the addition of $302.1 million of assets and the assumption of $251.9 million of liabilities as well as the addition of two10 branch offices serving the city of Napa. As a result, Bank of Marin is the largest community bank in Napa County based on deposit share1.offices.

We attract deposit relationships from small to medium-sized businesses, not-for-profit organizations and professionals, merchants and individuals who live and/or work in the communities comprising our market areas. As of December 31,

1 We obtained the FDIC deposit market share data from S&P Global Market Intelligence of New York, New York.



2017, approximately 67% of our deposits are in Marin County and southern Sonoma County, and approximately 55% of our deposits are from businesses and 45% from individuals.


Competition


The banking business in California generally, and in our market area specifically, is highly competitive with respect to attracting both loan and deposit relationships. The increasingly competitive environment is affected by changes in regulation, interest rates, technology and product delivery systems, and consolidation among financial service providers. The banking industry is seeing strong competition for quality loans, with larger banks expanding their activities to attract businesses that are traditionally community bank customers. In all of our five10 counties, we have significant competition from nationwide banks with much larger branch networks and greater financial resources, as
5


well as credit unions and other local and regional banks. Nationwide banks have the competitive advantages of national advertising campaignsdeveloping data analytics and technology infrastructure to achieve economies of scale.artificial intelligence tools and other technological platforms. Large commercial banks also have substantially greater lending limits and the ability to offer certain services, which are not offered directly by us. Other competitors for depositors' funds are money market mutual funds and non-bank financial institutions such as brokerage firms and insurance companies.


In order to compete withWe differentiate ourselves from the numerous, and often larger, financial institutions in our primary market area we use,with a business model built on relationship banking, disciplined fundamentals and commitment to the fullest extent possible, the flexibilitycommunities we serve. The Bank's experienced professionals deliver innovative and rapid response capabilities that derive from ourcustom financing, with a deep local leadershipmarket knowledge and decision making. Our competitive advantages also include an emphasis on personalized service, extensive community involvement, philanthropic giving, local promotional activities and strong relationships with our customers.a personal understanding of each customer's unique needs.


In Marin County, we have the thirdfourth largest market share of total depositsat 10.4%11.5%, based upon FDIC deposit market share data as of June 30, 2017220221 (most recent data available). A significant driver of our franchise value is the growth and stability of our checking deposits, a low-cost funding source for our loan portfolio.


EmployeesHuman Capital Resources


AtAs of December 31, 2017,2022, we employed 291313 full-time equivalent (“FTE”) staff. The actual number of employees, including part-time employees, at year-end 20172022 included seven executive officers, 123145 other corporate officers and 183172 staff. None of our employees are presently represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

We offer a competitive total compensation package including a comprehensive benefits program to our employees designed to attract, retain and motivate employees, as well as to align with our performance, including employee ownership through our Employee Stock Ownership Plan. We regularly compare compensation and benefits with peer companies and market data, making adjustments as needed to ensure compensation stays competitive. We are continually investing in our workforce through employee development, education and training.

We strive to attract, develop, retain and plan for succession of key talent and executives to achieve our strategic objectives. We pride ourselves on creating an open, diverse, and transparent culture that celebrates collaboration and recognizes employees at all levels. We believe that the wide array of perspectives that result from such diversity promotes Legendary Service and business success. We continue to learn and grow, and our current initiatives reflect our ongoing efforts around a more diverse, inclusive and equitable workplace.

In order to develop a workforce that aligns with our corporate values, we regularly sponsor local community events so that our employees can better integrate themselves in and support our communities. We believe that our employees’ well-being and personal and professional development is fostered by our outreach to the communities we serve. Our employees’ desire for active community involvement enables us to sponsor a number of local community events and initiatives, including funding and volunteering for youth mentorship and financial literacy programs to enhance educational opportunities and sponsoring local chambers of commerce and economic development corporations to foster economic vitality.

We recognize that employees who are engaged and committed to their work and workplace contribute meaningfully to our success. On a regular basis, we solicit employee feedback through a confidential, company-wide survey on culture, management, career opportunities, compensation, and benefits. The results of this survey are reviewed and used to update employee programs, initiatives, and communications. We believe that our employee relations are good. We have consistently been recognized as one of the “Best Places to Work” by the North Bay Business JournalJournal.

COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Response

Since the onset of the pandemic and national emergency, we have taken actions to ensure the health and safety of employees and customers. To protect the health of everyone, we have implemented COVID-19 safety protocols and continue to actively monitor federal, state and local guidelines and information related to COVID-19 to ensure the safety of our employees and customers. No employees have been laid off and no employees have had their pay reduced as a "Top Corporate Philanthropist” byresult of the San Francisco Business Times.pandemic.



1Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence of New York, New York
6


SUPERVISION AND REGULATION


Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following discussiondiscussion summarizes certain significant laws, rules and regulations affecting Bancorp and the Bank.


Bank Holding Company Regulation


Upon formation of the bank holding company on July 1, 2007, we became subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”) which subjects Bancorp to Federal Reserve reporting and examination requirements. Under the Federal Reserve law and regulations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, we areBancorp is expected to commit resources to support the Bank, including at times when weBancorp may not be in a financial position to provide such resources, and it may not be in our,Bancorp's, or ourBancorp's shareholders’ or creditors’, best interests to do so. In addition, any capital loans we makeBancorp makes to the Bank are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of the Bank. The BHCA regulates the activities of holding companies including acquisitions, mergers and consolidations and, together with the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act of 1999, the scope of allowable banking activities. Bancorp is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the California Financial Code. As such, Bancorp and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the DBO.DFPI.


2 Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence of New York, New York



Bank Regulation


Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect consumers, depositors' funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. These regulations affect our lending practices, consumer protections, capital structure, investment practices and dividend policy.


As a state chartered bank, we are subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the DBO.DFPI. We are also subject to regulation, supervision and periodic examination by the FDIC. If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the FDIC or the DBODFPI should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of our operations are unsatisfactory, or that we have violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to those regulators including issuing a “cease and desist” order, monetary penalties, restitution, restricting our growth or removing officers and directors.


The Bank addresses the many state and federal regulations it is subject to through a comprehensive compliance program.

Safety and Soundness Standards (Risk Management) 

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of federally insured depository institutions. The guidelines set forth standards for internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings.

During the past decade, the bank regulatory agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of sound risk management processes and strong internal controls when evaluating the activities of the financial institutions they supervise. Properly managing risks has been identified as critical to the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has become even more important as new technologies, product innovation, and the size and speed of financial transactions have changed the nature of banking markets. The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing a banking institution including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal, and reputational. In particular, recent regulatory pronouncements have focused on operational risk, which arises from the potential that inadequate information systems, operational problems, breaches in internal controls, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in unexpected losses. New products and services, third-party risk management and cybersecurity are critical sources of operational risk that financial institutions are expected to address in the current environment. The Board of Directors and various sub-committees oversee Bancorp's consolidated enterprise risk management program that addressesensures the various risks associated with these issues.adequacy of policies, procedures, tolerance levels, risk measurement systems, monitoring processes, management information systems and internal controls.


7


Dividends and Stock Repurchases


The paymentBancorp's ability to pay dividends to its shareholders may be affected by both general corporate law considerations and the policies of cash dividends by the BankFederal Reserve applicable to bank holding companies. As a California corporation, Bancorp is subject to restrictions set forth in the limitations of California Financial Code (the “Code”) in additionlaw, which allows a corporation to regulationsdistribute cash or property to shareholders, including a dividend or repurchase or redemption of shares, if the corporation meets certain tests based on its performance and policy statementsfinancial condition. Bancorp's primary source of cash is dividends received from the Federal Reserve.Bank. Prior to any distribution from the Bank to Bancorp, a calculation is made towe ensure compliancethat the dividend computations comply with the provisions of the California Financial Code and to ensure that the Bank remains within capital guidelinesregulations set forth by the DBODFPI and the FDIC. See alsoIn August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was enacted, which among other things, imposed a one percent excise tax on publicly traded U.S. corporations for the fair market value of stock repurchased after December 31, 2022. With certain exceptions, the value of stock repurchased is net of stock issued in the year, including those issued pursuant to share-based compensation programs. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the heading “Dividends” in ITEM 8 of this report.report for more information.


FDIC Insurance Assessments


The FDIC insures our customers' deposits to the maximum amount permitted by law, which is currently $250,000 per depositor, based on the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).


Our FDIC insurance coverage is funded by the FDIC's assessment on insured depository institutions like us and FDIC's annual base is quarterly average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, defined as Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. The FDIC has reduced the deposit insurance assessment rates since the Deposit Insurance Fund Reserve Ratio reached its target level as of June 30, 2016. Assessment rates are currently between 1.5 and 40 basis points annually on the depository institution's quarterly average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. Base assessment baserates for banks in all risk categories.vary depending on whether a depository institution is small or large and highly complex per FDIC's definition. In deriving the risk categories,base assessment rate, the FDIC uses a bank's capital level, supervisoryapplies financial ratios, scorecards, and other financial measures to determine a bank's ability to withstand financial stress.


In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The increased assessment is expected to improve the likelihood that the deposit insurance fund ("DIF") reserve ratio would reach the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline prescribed under the FDIC's amended restoration plan. The FDIC has indicated that the new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect until the DIF reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2 percent.

Community Reinvestment Act


Congress enacted the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) in 1977 to encourage financial institutions to meet the credit needs of the communities in which they are located. All banks and thrifts have a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with safe and sound operations, to help meet the credit needs of their entire communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. Regulatory agencies rate each bank's performance in assessing and meeting these credit needs. The Bank is committed to serving the credit needs of the communities in which we do business, and it is our policy to respond to all creditworthy segments of our market. As part of its CRA commitment, the Bank maintains strong philanthropic ties to the community. We invest in affordable housing projects that help economically disadvantaged individuals and residents of low- and moderate-income census tracts, in each case consistent with our long-established prudent underwriting practices. We also donate to, invest in and volunteer with organizations that serve the communities in which we do business, especially low- and moderate-income individuals. These organizations offer educational and health programs to economically disadvantaged students and families, community development services and affordable housing programs. We offer CRA reportable small business, small farm and community development loans within our assessment areas. The CRA requiresrequires a depository institution's primary federal regulator, in connection with its examination of the institution, to assess the institution's record in meeting CRA requirements. The regulatory agency's assessment of the institution's record is made available to the public. This record is taken into consideration when the institution establishes a new branch that accepts deposits, relocates an office, applies to merge or consolidate, or expands into other activities. The FDIC assigned a “Satisfactory” rating to itsBank of Marin's CRA performance examination based on their most recent examination completed in May 2015,January 2021, which was performed under the large bank requirements.
8


In May 2022, the federal banking agencies issued a joint notice of proposed rule to revise the regulations implementing the CRA. The FDIC completedproposed rules, among other things, seek to (i) expand access to credit, investment, and basic banking services in low- and moderate-income communities, (ii) adapt to changes in the banking industry, including internet and mobile banking, (iii) provide greater clarity, consistency, and transparency, (iv) tailor CRA evaluations and data collection to bank size and type, and (v) maintain a performance examination in January 2018,unified approach among the reportbank regulatory agencies. We will continue to evaluate the impact of any changes to the regulations implementing the CRA and their impact to our financial condition, results of operations, and/or liquidity, which is pending.cannot be predicted at this time.




Anti-Money-Laundering Regulations


A series of banking laws and regulations beginning with the Bank Secrecy Act in 1970 requires banks to prevent, detect, and report illicit or illegal financial activities to the federal government to prevent money laundering, international drug trafficking, and terrorism. Under the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships, requirements regarding the Customer Identification Program, as well as enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with high risk customers, foreign financial institutions, and foreign individuals and entities. In 2016, Customer Due Diligence Rules under the Bank Secrecy Act clarified and strengthened customer due diligence requirements. These rules contained explicit customer due diligence requirements, which included a new requirement to identify and verify the identity of beneficial owners of legal entity customers. In 2020, the Anti-Money Laundering Act ("AMLA 2020") became law. Among its many provisions, AMLA 2020 provides for: 1) expanded whistleblower rewards and protections; 2) the establishment of a beneficial ownership registration database that will be implemented by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN"); and 3) new Bank Secrecy Act violations and enhanced penalties for repeat and egregious violators.


Privacy, Data Protection, and Data SecurityCybersecurity


The Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (“GLBA”) of 1999 imposes requirements on financial institutions with respect to consumer privacy.privacy and the disclosure of non-public personal information about individuals who apply for or obtain a financial product to be used for personal, family or household purposes. The GLBA generally prohibits disclosure of consumer information to non-affiliatedmost nonaffiliated third parties unless the consumer has been given the opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their privacy policies to consumers annually.and the conditions under which an institution may disclose non-public information about a consumer to a nonaffiliated third party. The GLBA also directs federal regulators, including the FDIC, to prescribe standards for the security of consumer information. We are subject to such standards, as well as standards for notifying consumers in the event of a security breach. We must disclose our privacy policy to consumers and permit consumers to “opt out”"opt out" of having non-public customer information disclosed to third parties. We are required to have an information security program to safeguard the confidentiality and security of customer information and to ensure proper disposal of information that is no longer needed. We notify our customers when unauthorized disclosure involves sensitive customer information that may be misused. Effective January 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) added required notice about personal information we collect, use, share, and disclose for business purposes. The CCPA provides California residents rights regarding their personal information specifically related to exercising access, data portability and deletion rights. There are also California breach notification and disclosure requirements.


On November 23, 2021, the federal banking agencies issued a final rule requiring banking organizations that experience a computer-security incident to notify their primary Federal regulator of the occurrence of an event that rises to the level of a “notification incident.” Generally, a notification incident occurs when a banking organization has suffered a computer-security incident that has a reasonable likelihood of materially disrupting or degrading the banking organization or its operations. The rule requires an affected banking organization to notify its primary Federal regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after the banking organization has determined that a notification incident has occurred. The rule also requires bank service providers to notify each affected banking organization if that bank service provider experiences a computer-security incident that has caused, or is reasonably likely to cause, a material service disruption or degradation for four or more hours. The rule became effective on April 1, 2022, with a compliance date of May 1, 2022.

9


In February 2018, the SEC published interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. Additionally, in March 2022, the SEC issued proposed rules that would, among other things, require disclosures of material cybersecurity incidents, along with cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance.

Consumer Protection Regulations


Our lending activities are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers, including the CRA, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Lending, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Flood Disaster Protection Act, eSign Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, Truth-in-Lending Act ("TILA"), the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure, and the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act ("SAFE"). Our deposit operations are also subject to laws and regulations that protect consumer rights including Expedited Funds Availability, Truth in Savings Act ("TISA"), and Electronic Funds Transfers. Other regulatory requirements include:include the Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Acts and Practices ("UDAAP"), Dodd-Frank Act, Right to Financial Privacy, Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Privacy of Consumer Financial Information. Additional rules govern check writing ability on certain interest earning accounts and prescribe procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records.


Restriction on Transactions between Bank's Affiliates


Transactions between Bancorp and the Bank are quantitatively and qualitatively restricted under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Regulation W. Section 23A places restrictions on the Bank's “covered transactions” with Bancorp, including loans and other extensions of credit, investments in the securities of, and purchases of assets from Bancorp. Section 23B requires that certain transactions, including all covered transactions, be on market terms and conditions. Federal Reserve Regulation W combines statutory restrictions on transactions between the Bank and Bancorp with Federal Reserve interpretations in an effort to simplify compliance with Sections 23A and 23B.


Capital Requirements


The Federal ReserveDeposit Insurance Act, as amended (“FDIA”), requires federal banking agencies to take prompt corrective action (“PCA”) with respect to depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDIA includes the following five capital tiers: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and the FDIC have adopted risk-based“critically undercapitalized.” A depository institution’s capital guidelines for bank holding companiestier will depend upon how its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and banks.certain other factors, as established by regulation. Bancorp's ratios exceed the required minimum ratios for capital adequacy purposes and the Bank meets the definition for "well capitalized." Undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to significant restrictions. Banks that are categorized as "critically undercapitalized" under applicable FDIC regulations are subject to dividend and other restrictions.

In July 2013,Effective January 1, 2020, the federal banking regulators approved aagencies' jointly-issued final rule to implementon the revisedcommunity bank leverage ratio ("CBLR") provides for an optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy standardsfor qualifying community banking organizations, consistent with Section 201 of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly called Basel III. The final rule strengthens the definitionEconomic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the "Economic Growth Act"). Qualifying community banking organizations are defined as having less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets that meet risk-based qualifying criteria, a CBLR of regulatory capital, increasesgreater than 9 percent, off-balance sheet exposure of 25 percent or less of total consolidated assets, trading assets and liabilities of 5 percent or less of total consolidated assets, and cannot be an advanced approaches institution. Such a community banking organization would not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements makes selected changes to the calculation of risk-weighted assets, and adjusts the prompt corrective action thresholds. We became subject to the new rule on January 1,


2015 and certain provisions of the new rule will be phased in over the period of 2015 through 2019. In August 2017, the federal banking regulators published a final rule, halting the phase-in of certain Basel III capital rules. The rule extends the regulatory capital treatment applicable during 2017 under the regulatory capital rules for certain items. This effectively pauses the full transition to(including the Basel III treatment of certain assets untiland Basel IV requirements) and would be considered to have met the federal banking regulators pursue more extensive rulemaking to simplify the treatment of those"well capitalized" ratio requirements. The CBLR is determined by dividing a financial institution’s tangible equity capital by its average total consolidated assets. We have modeled our ratios under the finalized Basel III rulesThe rule further describes what is included in tangible equity capital and we do not expect that we will be required to raise additional capital when the new rules fully phase in. For further information on our risk-based capital positionsaverage total consolidated assets. Qualifying banks may opt in and the effectout of the new Basel III rules, see Note 15 toCBLR framework at any time. While we are a qualifying community banking organization, we have not opted into the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8CBLR framework at this time. See below, for further discussion of this report.the Economic Growth Act.



10


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act


The Dodd-Frank Act, a landmark financial reform bill comprised of voluminous new rules and restrictions on bank operations, included provisions aimed at preventing a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis and a new process for winding down failing, systemically important institutions in a manner as close to a controlled bankruptcy as possible. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act established new government oversight responsibilities, enhanced capital adequacy requirements for certain institutions, established consumer protection laws and regulations, and placed limitations on certain banking activities. The current Presidential Administration ("Administration") issued

In an executive order to consider reforming the Dodd-Frank Act in orderattempt to reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. companies, including financial institutions. At this time, no detailsinstitutions, in May 2018, the Presidential Administration signed the Economic Growth Act, which repealed or modified certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and eased regulations on all but the proposed reforms have been publishedlargest banks. The Economic Growth Act’s highlights included improving consumer access to mortgage credit, added certain protections for consumers, included veterans and we are uncertain whether the intended deregulation will have a significant impact on us.active duty military personnel, expanded credit freezes and created an identity theft protection database.


Notice and Approval Requirements Related to Control


Banking laws impose notice, approval and ongoing regulatory requirements on any shareholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect "control" of an FDIC-insured depository institution. These laws include the BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act. Among other things, these laws require regulatory filings by a shareholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect "control" of an FDIC-insured depository institution or bank holding company. The determination whether an investor "controls" a depository institution is based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the investment. As a general matter, a party is deemed to control a depository institution or other company if the party owns or controls 25% or more of any class of voting stock. Subject to rebuttal, a party may be presumed to control a depository institution or other company if the investor owns or controls 10% or more of any class of voting stock. Ownership by family members, affiliated parties, or parties acting in concert, is typically aggregated for these purposes. If a party's ownership of the Company were to exceed certain thresholds, the investor could be deemed to "control" the Company for regulatory purposes. This could subject the investor to regulatory filings or other regulatory consequences.


In addition, except under limited circumstances, bank holding companies are prohibited from acquiring, without prior approval: 1) control of any other bank or bank holding company or all or substantially all the assets thereof; or 2) more than 5% of the voting shares of a bank or bank holding company that is not already a subsidiary.


Incentive Compensation


The Dodd-Frank Act required federal bank regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to establish joint regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing an executive officer, employee, director or principal stockholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. These regulations apply to institutions having at least $1 billion in total assets. In addition, regulators must establish regulations or guidelines requiring enhanced disclosure to regulators of incentive-based compensation arrangements. The agencies have not finalized regulations proposed in April 2011.2016. If adopted, the agencies adopt theproposed regulations in the form initially proposed, they will impose limitationscould place limits on the manner in which we may structure compensation for our executives.executive compensation.


The Federal Reserve will review,reviews, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as us, that are not “large, complex banking organizations. The Federal Reserve will tailor theirtailors its reviews for each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will beare included in reports of examination. Deficiencies, will beif any, are incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a


banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.


11


In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule directing national securities exchanges and associations, including the Nasdaq, to implement listing standards that require public companies to adopt policies mandating the recovery or “clawback” of excess incentive-based compensation earned by a current or former executive officer during the three fiscal years preceding the date the listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error was either corrected or left uncorrected in the current period. The final rule requires us to adopt a clawback policy within 60 days after such listing standard becomes effective and file the policy as an exhibit in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Available Information


On our Internet web site,website, www.bankofmarin.com, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Annual Report to Shareholders, Form 10-K, Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. All such materials on our website are available free of charge. This website address is for information only and is not intended to be an active link, or to incorporate any website information into this document. In addition, copies of our filings are available by requesting them in writing or by phone from:


Corporate Secretary
Bank of Marin Bancorp    
504 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 100
Novato, CA 94947
415-763-4523

These materials are also available at the SEC’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov).

ITEM 1A1A.      RISK FACTORS


We assume and manage a certain degree of risk in order to conduct our business. The material risks and uncertainties that Managementmanagement believes may affect our business are listed below and in ITEM 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk. The list is not exhaustive; additional risks and uncertainties that Managementmanagement is not aware of, or focused on, or currently deems immaterial may also impair business operations. If any of the following risks, or risks that have not been identified, actually occur, our financial condition, results of operations, and stock trading price could be materially and adversely affected. We manage these risks by promoting sound corporate governance practices, which includesinclude but isare not limited to, establishing policies and internal controls, and implementing internal review processes. Before making an investment decision, investors should carefully consider the risks, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.


Earnings are Significantly Influenced by General BusinessStrategic, Financial, and Economic ConditionsReputational Risks

Our success depends, to a certain extent, on local, national and global economic and political conditions. While labor market conditions continue to strengthen, real gross domestic product rose at a solid pace during the second half of 2017, and household spending had been expanding at a moderate pace, there is no assurance that these improvements are sustainable. Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding the sustainability of the economic improvements may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and savings habits, which may affect the demand for loans and other products and services we offer. Our success also depends on the general economic conditions of the State of California, particularly the local markets in which we operate within the San Francisco Bay Area. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers in the greater Bay Area. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of our deposit funding sources. In addition, oil price volatility, the level of U.S. debt and global economic conditions could destabilize financial markets. Lastly, the pro-growth fiscal policy could cause the inflation rate to rise faster than expected, compelling the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates rapidly to combat inflation and causing stock market volatility, which we observed in early 2018.

In general, weakness in commercial and residential real estate values and home sale volumes, financial stress on borrowers, increases in unemployment rates1, and customers' inability to pay debt could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the following ways:

1 According to the California Employment Development Department's December 2017 labor reports, the unemployment rates in Marin, San Francisco, Sonoma, Alameda and Napa counties were 2.3%, 2.4%, 2.8%, 3.0% and 3.6%, respectively, compared to the state of California record low of 4.3%, which was down from 5.2% at the end of 2016.


Demand for our products and services may decline;
Low cost or non-interest bearing deposits may decrease;
Collateral for our loans, especially real estate, may decline in value;
Loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures may increase as a result of a deterioration of our borrowers' creditworthiness; and
Investment securities may become impaired.

Interest Rate Risk is Inherent in Our Business

Our earnings are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are sensitive to many factors outside of our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the FOMC, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, can influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but can also affect (i) our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of our securities and loan portfolios. Our portfolio of loans and securities will generally decline in value if market interest rates increase, and increase in value if market interest rates decline. In addition, our loans and callable mortgage-backed securities are also subject to prepayment risk when interest rates fall, and the borrowers' credit risk may increase in rising rate environments.

The FOMC increased the federal funds target rate by 25 basis points (basis points are equal to one hundredth of a percentage point) each in March, June and December 2017 to a current range of 1.25% to 1.50%. While there was no interest rate action in the first meeting of 2018, the FOMC indicated that it may consider further gradual adjustments in 2018 in light of strong labor markets and expectations that inflation will reach the targeted two percent inflation rate over the medium term. Additionally, other factors such as productivity, oil prices, the strength of the U.S. dollar, and global demand play a role in the FOMC's consideration of future rate hikes. Our net interest income is vulnerable to a falling or flat rate environment and will benefit if the prevailing market interest rates increase.

However, a rise in index rates leads to lower debt service coverage of variable rate loans if the borrower's operating cash flow does not also rise. This creates a paradox of an improving economy (leading to higher interest rates) with increased credit risk as short-term rates move up faster than the cash flow or income of the borrowers. Higher interest rates may also depress loan demand, making it more difficult for us to grow loans.
See the sections captioned “Net Interest Income” in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in ITEM 7 and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in ITEM 7A of this report for further discussion related to management of interest rate risk.

Banks and Bank Holding Companies are Subject to Extensive Government Regulation and Supervision

Bancorp and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state governmental supervision, regulation and control. Holding company regulations affect the range of activities in which Bancorp is engaged. Banking regulations affect the Bank's lending practices, capital structure, investment practices and dividend policy, and compliance costs among other things. Future legislative changes or interpretations may also alter the structure and competitive relationship among financial institutions.

Disruptions in the financial marketplace have led to additional regulations in an attempt to reform financial markets. This reform included, among other things, regulations over consumer financial products, capital adequacy, and the creation of a regime for regulating systemic risk across all types of financial service firms. Further restrictions on financial service companies may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as well as increase our compliance risk. While regulations for higher capital requirements have been postponed and there are discussions to deregulate further the financial industry under the current Administration, the nature and extent of future legislative and regulatory changes from both the federal and California legislatures affecting us are unpredictable at this time.

Compliance risk is the current and prospective risk to earnings or capital arising from violations of, or non-conformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, internal policies and procedures, or ethical standards set forth by regulators. Compliance risk also arises in situations where the laws or rules governing certain bank products or activities


of our clients may be ambiguous or untested. This risk exposes Bancorp and the Bank to potential fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding of contracts. Compliance risk can lead to diminished reputation, reduced franchise value, limited business opportunities, reduced expansion potential and an inability to enforce contracts.

For further information on supervision and regulation, see the section captioned “Supervision and Regulation” in ITEM 1 above.

Intense Competition with Other Financial Institutions to Attract and Retain Banking Customers

We are facing significant competition for customers from other banks and financial institutions located in the markets that we serve. We compete with commercial banks, saving institutions, credit unions, non-bank financial services companies, including financial technology firms, and other financial institutions operating within or near our service areas. Some of our non-bank competitors and peer-to-peer lenders may not be subject to the same extensive regulations as we are, giving them greater flexibility in competing for business. We anticipate intense competition will continue for the coming year due to the consolidation of many financial institutions and more changes in legislature, regulation and technology. National and regional banks much larger than our size have entered our market through acquisitions and they may be able to benefit from economies of scale through their wider branch networks, more prominent national advertising campaigns, lower cost of borrowing, capital market access and sophisticated technology infrastructures. Further, intense competition for creditworthy borrowers could lead to pressure for loan rate concessions and affect our ability to generate profitable loans.

Going forward, we may see continued competition in the industry as competitors seek to expand market share in our core markets. Further, our customers may withdraw deposits to pursue alternative investment opportunities in the recent bullish equity market. Technology and other changes have made it more convenient for bank customers to transfer funds into alternative investments or other deposit accounts such as online virtual banks and non-bank service providers. Efforts and initiatives we may undertake to retain and increase deposits, including deposit pricing, can increase our costs. Based on our current strong liquidity position, our adjustment to deposit pricing may lag the market in a rising interest rate environment. If our customers move money into higher yielding deposits or alternative investments, we may lose a relatively inexpensive source of funds, thus increasing our funding costs through more expensive wholesale borrowings.

Activities of Our Large Borrowers and Depositors May Cause Unexpected Volatilities in Our Loan and Deposit Balances, as well as Net Interest Margin

Rising real estate values in the Bay Area market have motivated some of our borrowers to sell real estate that collateralized our loans, contributing to loan payoff activity. We experienced loan payoffs of $133 million and $158 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. These payoffs approximated nine and eleven percent annual turnover of our loan portfolio in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Payoffs of loans originated during a higher interest rate environment may be replaced by new loans with lower interest rates, causing downward pressure on our net interest margin.

In addition, the top ten depositor relationships account for approximately nine percent of our total deposit balances. The business models and cash cycles of some of our large commercial depositors may also cause short-term volatility in their deposit balances held with us. As our customers' businesses grow, the dollar value of their daily activities may also grow leading to larger fluctuations in daily balances. Any long-term decline in deposit funding would adversely affect our liquidity. For additional information on our management of deposit volatility, refer to the Liquidity section of ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this report.

Negative Conditions Affecting Real Estate May Harm Our Business and Our Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") Concentration May Heighten Such Risk

Concentration of our lending activities in the California real estate sector could negatively affect our results of operations if adverse changes in our lending area occur. Although we do not offer traditional first mortgages, nor have sub-prime or Alt-A residential loans or significant amounts of securities backed by such loans in the portfolio, we are not immune to volatility in those markets. Approximately 87% of our loans were secured by real estate at December 31, 2017, of which 70% were secured by CRE and the remaining 17% by residential real estate. Real estate valuations are influenced by demand, and demand is driven by economic factors such as employment rates and interest rates.



Loans secured by CRE include those secured by office buildings, owner-user office/warehouses, mixed-use residential/commercial properties and retail properties. There can be no assurance that the companies or properties securing our loans will generate sufficient cash flows to allow borrowers to make full and timely loan payments to us. In the event of default, the collateral value may not cover the outstanding amount due to us, especially during real estate market downturns.

Rising CRE lending concentrations may expose institutions to unanticipated earnings and capital volatility in the event of adverse changes in the CRE market. The FDIC applies two criteria for identifying institutions that are potentially exposed to significant CRE concentration risk. The first criterion looks at whether non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, as defined by the guidelines, exceed 300% of the Bank's total capital. As of December 31, 2017, our non-owner occupied CRE loans represented 317% of the Bank's capital, which declined from 332% as of December 31, 2016. The second criterion measures whether the non-owner occupied CRE growth rate during the prior thirty six months exceeds 50%. Since December 31, 2014, our non-owner occupied CRE portfolio has grown by 22%, below the 50% growth rate per the regulatory guideline. We maintain heightened review and analyses of our concentrations and have regular conversations with regulators to avoid unexpected regulatory risk.

Severe Weather, Natural Disasters or Other Climate Change Related Matters Could Significantly Affect Our Business

Our primary market is located in an earthquake-prone zone in northern California, which is also subject to other weather or disasters, such as severe rainstorms, wildfire, drought or flood. These events could interrupt our business operations unexpectedly. Climate-related physical changes and hazards could also pose credit risks for us. For example, our borrowers may have collateral properties or operations located in coastal areas at risk to rising sea levels and erosion or subject to the risk of drought in California. The properties pledged as collateral on our loan portfolio could also be damaged by tsunamis, landslides, floods, earthquakes or wildfires and thereby the recoverability of loans could be impaired. A number of factors can affect credit losses, including the extent of damage to the collateral, the extent of damage not covered by insurance, the extent to which unemployment and other economic conditions caused by the natural disaster adversely affect the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, and the cost of collection and foreclosure to us. Lastly, there could be increased insurance premiums and deductibles, or a decrease in the availability of coverage, due to severe weather-related losses. The ultimate outcome on our business of a natural disaster, whether or not caused by climate change, is difficult to predict.

In October 2017, much of the North Bay region of Northern California was struck by widespread and destructive wildfires. Fortunately, there was no damage to bank facilities and no significant impairment to services. Management has assessed the impact of the fires on our loan and investment portfolios; including mapping client addresses and locations of municipal bond issuers to areas affected by the fires and evaluating any known damage to collateral and businesses. Based on our assessment, the loss to properties and businesses located in the affected areas that are pledged as collateral to our loans or bonds is minimal. However, the long-term impact to the Napa and Sonoma regional economies is uncertain. Management is monitoring the situation and will continue to respond to the needs of customers and employees during the rebuilding process.

We are Subject to Significant Credit Risk and Loan Losses May Exceed Our Allowance for Loan Losses in the Future

We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through provisions for loan losses charged to expense, that represents Management's best estimate of probable losses that may be incurred within the existing portfolio of loans (the "incurred loss model"). The level of the allowance reflects Management's continuing evaluation of specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality and present economic, political and regulatory conditions. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Further, we generally rely on appraisals of the collateral or comparable sales data to determine the level of specific reserve and/or the charge-off amount on certain collateral dependent loans. Inaccurate assumptions in the appraisals or an inappropriate choice of the valuation techniques may lead to an inadequate level of specific reserve or charge-offs.

Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans and their collateral, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors may require an increase in our allowance for loan losses.


In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses or cash flows from acquired loans do not perform as expected, we will need to record additional provision for loan losses.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Under the new guidance, entities will be required to measure expected credit losses by utilizing forward-looking information to assess an entity's allowance for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of a credit over its remaining life. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for potential credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We have formed an internal Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") committee and are working with our third party vendor to determine the appropriate methodologies and resources to utilize in preparation for transition to the new accounting standards. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 for further discussion.

Non-performing Assets Take Significant Time to Resolve and Adversely Affect Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

While our non-performing assets are currently at a low level, there can be no assurance that we will not experience increases in non-performing assets in the future. Generally, interest income is not recognized on non-performing loans and the administrative costs on these loans are higher than performing loans. We might incur losses if the creditworthiness of our borrowers deteriorates to a point when we need to take collateral in foreclosures and similar proceedings, resulting in possible mark down of the loans to the fair value of the collateral. While we have managed our problem assets through workouts, restructurings and other proactive credit management practices that mitigate credit losses, decreases in the value of the underlying collateral, or deterioration in borrowers' performance or financial conditions, whether or not due to economic and market conditions beyond our control, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of non-performing assets can distract Management from other responsibilities.

Securities May Lose Value due to Credit Quality of the Issuers

We invest in significant portions of investment securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises ("GSE"), such as Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), and Federal Farm Credit Bank. We also hold mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC. While we consider these securities to have low credit risk as they carry the backing of the U.S. Government, they are not direct obligations of the U.S. Government. GSE debt is sponsored but not guaranteed by the federal government, whereas government agencies such as Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") are divisions of the government whose securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

Since 2008, both FNMA and FHLMC have been under a U.S. Government conservatorship. As a result, securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC have benefited from this government support. However, housing finance reform may be introduced to end GSE status, place FNMA and FHLMC into receivership and replace them with multiple mortgage guarantors, which could impact the fair value of our securities issued or guaranteed by these entities. In October 2017, the FOMC initiated the balance sheet normalization program, in which it intends to reduce the Federal Reserve's holdings of Treasury and agency securities by gradually decreasing its reinvestment of the principal payments it receives from securities. If the U.S. Government stops reinvesting or starts selling their holdings in U.S. Treasury or MBS issued by the GSE; if the government support is phased-out or completely withdrawn; or if either FNMA or FHLMC comes under financial stress or suffers creditworthiness deterioration, the value of our investments may be significantly impacted.

We also invest in tax exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions whose value have been affected by tax rate reductions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Additionally, while we generally seek to minimize our exposure by diversifying the geographic location of our portfolio and investing in investment grade securities, there is no guarantee that the issuers will remain financially sound or continue their payments on these debentures.


Unexpected Early Termination of Interest Rate Swap Agreements May Affect Earnings

We have entered into interest-rate swap agreements, primarily as an asset/liability risk management tool, in order to mitigate the changes in the fair value of specified long-term fixed-rate loans and firm commitments to enter into long-term fixed-rate loans caused by changes in interest rates. These hedges allow us to offer long-term, fixed-rate loans to customers without assuming the interest rate risk of a long-term asset by swapping our fixed-rate interest stream for a floating-rate interest stream. In the event of default by the borrowers on our hedged loans, we may have to terminate these designated interest-rate swap agreements early, resulting in prepayment penalties charged by our counterparties and negatively affect our earnings.


Growth Strategy or Potential FutureMergers and Acquisitions May Produce Unfavorable Outcomes


We seek to expand our franchise safely and consistently. A successful growth strategy requires us to manage multiple aspects of the business simultaneously, such as following adequate loan underwriting standards, balancing loan and deposit growth without increasing interest rate risk or compressing our net interest margin, managing interest rate risk, maintaining sufficient capital, and recruiting, training and retaining qualified professionals.

Our strategic plan also includes merger and acquisition possibilitiesopportunities that either enhance our market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale or expanded services, such as the Bank of Napa acquisition in 2017.services. We may incur significant acquisition related expenses either during the due diligence phase of acquisition targets or during integration of the acquirees. These expenses have and may continue to negatively impact our earnings prior to realizing the benefits of acquisitions. We may also be exposed to difficulties in combining the operations of acquired institutions into our own operations, which may prevent us from achieving the expected benefits from our acquisition activities. Our earnings, financial condition and prospects after the merger may affect our stock price and will depend in part on our ability to integrate the operations and management of the acquired institution while continuing to implement other aspects of our business plan. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired
12


institution and there is no assurance that we will be able to do so successfully. Among the issues that we could face are:

unexpected problems with operations, personnel, technology or credit;
loss of customers and employees of the acquiree;
difficulty in working with the acquiree's employees and customers;
the assimilation and integration of the acquiree's operations, culture and personnel;
instituting and maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies; and
litigation risk or obligations not discovered during the due diligence period.

diligence.
Undiscovered factors as a result of an acquisition could bring liabilities against us, our management and the management of the institutions we acquire. These factors could contribute to our not achieving the expected benefits from our acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all. Further, although we generally anticipate cost savings from acquisitions, we may not be able to fully realize those savings. Any cost savings may be offset by losses in revenues or other charges to earnings.


Competition with Other Financial Institutions to Attract and Retain Banking Customers

We are facing significant competition for customers from other banks and financial institutions located in the markets that we serve. We compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions, non-bank financial services companies, including financial technology firms, and other financial institutions operating within or near our service areas. Some of our non-bank competitors and peer-to-peer lenders may not be subject to the same extensive regulations as we are, giving them greater flexibility in competing for business. We anticipate intense competition will continue for the coming year due to the consolidation of many financial institutions and more changes in legislation, regulation and technology. National and regional banks much larger than our size have entered our market through acquisitions and they may be able to benefit from economies of scale through their wider branch networks, more prominent national advertising campaigns, lower cost of borrowing, capital market access and sophisticated technology infrastructures. Further, intense competition for creditworthy borrowers could lead to pressure for loan rate concessions and affect our ability to generate profitable loans.

Going forward, we may see continued competition in the industry as competitors seek to expand market share in our core markets. Further, our customers may withdraw deposits to pursue alternative investment opportunities in the equity market. Technology and other changes have made it more convenient for bank customers to transfer funds into alternative investments or other deposit platforms such as online virtual banks and non-bank service providers. Efforts and initiatives we may undertake to retain and increase deposits, including deposit pricing, can increase our costs. Based on our current strong liquidity position, our adjustment to deposit pricing has lagged the market in a rising interest rate environment. If our customers move money into higher yielding deposits or alternative investments, we may lose a relatively inexpensive source of funds, thus increasing our funding costs through more expensive wholesale funding sources, such as federal funds or FHLB borrowings.

Financial Challenges at Other Banking Institutions Could Lead to Depositor Concerns That Spread Within the Banking Industry Causing Disruptive Deposit Outflows and Other Destabilizing Results That Could Adversely Affect Our Liquidity, Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In March 2023, certain specialized banking institutions with elevated concentrations of uninsured deposits experienced large deposit outflows, resulting in the institutions being placed into FDIC receiverships. In the aftermath, there has been substantial market disruption and indications that deposit outflows and other destabilizing results could spread within the banking industry. We maintain a well-diversified deposit base, with an estimated 44% of our deposits as of December 31, 2022 in excess of FDIC insurance limits. Such uninsured deposits were fully covered by the Bank's contingent liquidity at that time. Excluding zero balance accounts, the approximate average size of our consumer deposit accounts was less than $43 thousand, and the average size of our business deposit accounts was less than $139 thousand as of December 31, 2022. Although we maintain strong liquidity for the normal operations of the Bank, model various stress scenarios, and maintain significant contingent liquidity sources, general depositor concerns given the recent high profile bank closures could lead to deposit outflows from our Bank. Significant deposit outflows could negatively affect our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, and distribute dividends to our shareholders. In addition, such a lack of liquidity could result in the sale of securities in an unrealized loss position and/or alter our ability to hold our held-to-maturity securities to their maturity dates. All of
13


these factors could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We May Not Be Able to Attract and Retain Key Employees


Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract qualified personnel and to retain key people. Competition foremployees, as well as the best people in most activities engaged by us has been intense, especially in lightprompt replacement of the recent improvement in the job market, and we may not be able to hire skilled people or retain them. We do not have non-compete agreements with any of our senior officers.retiring executives. The unexpected loss of key personnel and/or our inability to secure qualified candidates to replace retiring executives could have an unfavorable effect on our business because ofdue to the required skills and knowledge of our market and years of industry experienceexperience.

Bancorp Relies on Dividends from the Bank to Pay Cash Dividends to its Shareholders as Well as to Meet Other Financial Obligations

Bancorp is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary, the Bank. Bancorp receives substantially its entire cash stream from the Bank in the form of dividends, which is Bancorp's principal source of funds to pay cash dividends to Bancorp's common shareholders, repurchase shares, and difficultycover operational expenses of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

Accounting Estimatesthe holding company. Various federal and Risk Management Processes Rely on Analyticalstate laws and Forecasting Models

The processes we useregulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to estimate probable loan losses andBancorp. In the event that the Bank is unable to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes usedpay dividends to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on our financial condition and results of operations, depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. These models reflect assumptions thatBancorp, Bancorp may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even


if these assumptions are adequate, the models may proveable to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models we use for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, we may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models we use for determining our probable loan losses are inadequate, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficientpay dividends to support future charge-offs. If the models we use to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what we could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Any such failure in our analytical or forecasting modelsits shareholders. As a result, it could have a materialan adverse effect on our business, financial conditionBancorp's stock price and resultsinvestment value.

Federal law would prohibit capital distributions from the Bank, with limited exceptions, if the Bank were categorized as "undercapitalized" under applicable Federal Reserve or FDIC regulations. In addition, as a California bank, Bank of operations.Marin is subject to state law restrictions on the payment of dividends. For further information on the distribution limit from the Bank to Bancorp, see the section captioned “Bank Regulation” in ITEM 1 above and “Dividends” in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


The Value of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets May Decline in the Future


As of December 31, 2017,2022, we had goodwill totaling $30.1$72.8 million and a core deposit intangible asset totaling $6.5$5.1 million from business acquisitions. A significantsignificant decline in expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates or a significant and sustained decline in the price of our common stock could necessitate taking charges in the future related to the impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets. If we were to conclude that a future write-down of goodwill or other intangible assets is necessary, we would record the appropriate charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We May Take Tax Filing Positions or Follow Tax Strategies That May Be Subject to Challenge


We provide for current and deferred tax provision in our consolidated financial statements based on our results of operations, business activities and business combinations, legal structure and federal and state legislation and regulations, which is still evolving from the December 2017 enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.regulations. We may take filing positions or follow tax strategies that are subject to interpretation of tax statutes. Our net income may be reduced if a federal, state or local authority were to assess charges for taxes that have not been provided for in our consolidated financial statements. Taxing authorities could change applicable tax laws and interpretations, challenge filing positions, or assess new taxes and interest charges. If taxing authorities take any of these actions, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be significantly affected.


The Financial Services Industry is Undergoing Rapid Technological ChangesMarket, Interest Rate, and As a Result, We Have a Continuing Need to Stay Current with Those Changes to Compete Effectively and Increase Our Efficiencies. We May Not Have the Resources to Implement New Technology to Stay Current with These ChangesLiquidity Risks
The financial services industry is undergoing technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to providing better client service, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and reduces operational costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands securely and cost-effectively. In connection with implementing new technology enhancements and/or products, we may experience operational challenges (e.g. human error, system error, incompatibility) which could result in us not fully realizing the anticipated benefits from such new technology or require us to incur significant costs to remedy any such challenges in a timely manner.

Risks Associated with Cyber Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings and Reputation

Our business requires the secure management of sensitive client and bank information. We work diligently to implement security measures that intend to make our communications and information systems safe to conduct business. Cyber threats such as social engineering, ransomware, and phishing emails are more prevalent now than ever before. These incidents include intentional and unintentional events that may present threats designed to disrupt operations, corrupt data, release sensitive information or cause denial-of-service attacks. A cyber security breach of systems operated by the Bank, merchants, vendors, customers, or externally publicized breaches of other financial institutions may significantly harm our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and financial liability. While we have systems and procedures designed to prevent security breaches, we cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access will not compromise or breach the technology protecting our networks or proprietary client information.



We Rely on Third-Party Vendors for Important Aspects of Our Operation

We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information and systems provided by certain key vendors, including but not limited to data processing, payroll processing, technology support, investment safekeeping and accounting. For example, we outsource core processing to Fidelity Information Services ("FIS") and wire processing to Finastra, which are leading financial services solution providers that allow us access to competitive technology offerings without having to invest in their development. Our ability to operate, as well as our financial condition and results of operations, could be negatively affected in the event of an interruption of an information system, an undetected error, a cyber-breach, or in the event of a natural disaster whereby certain vendors are unable to maintain business continuity.

Failure of Correspondent Banks May Affect Liquidity

Financial services institutions are highly interrelated because of clearing and exchange, counterparty, and other business relationships. In particular, the financial services industry in general was materially and adversely affected by the recent credit crisis, including the failure and consolidation of banks in the industry in recent years. While we regularly monitor the financial health of our correspondent banks and we have diverse sources of liquidity, should any one of our correspondent banks become financially impaired, our available credit may decline and/or they may be unable to honor their commitments.

Deterioration of Credit Quality or Insolvency of Insurance Companies May Impede Our Ability to Recover Losses

We have property, casualty and financial institution risk coverage underwritten by several insurance companies, who may not avoid insolvency risk inherent in the insurance industry. In addition, some of our investments in obligations of state and political subdivisions are insured by insurance companies. While we closely monitor the credit ratings of our insurers and the insurers of our municipal securities and we are poised to make quick changes if needed, we cannot predict an unexpected inability to honor commitments. We also invest in bank-owned life insurance policies on certain members of Management, which may lose value in the event of a carrier's insolvency. In the event that a bank-owned life insurance policy carrier's credit ratings fall below investment grade, we may exchange policies to other carriers at a cost charged by the original carrier, or we may terminate the policies, which may result in adverse tax consequences.

Our loan portfolio is secured primarily by properties located in earthquake or fire-prone zones. In the event of a disaster that causes pervasive damage to the region in which we operate, not only the Bank, but also the loan collateral may suffer losses not recoverable by insurance.

Bancorp Relies on Dividends from the Bank to Pay Cash Dividends to Shareholders

Bancorp is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary, the Bank. Bancorp receives substantially all of its cash stream from the Bank in the form of dividends, which is Bancorp's principal source of funds to pay cash dividends to Bancorp's common shareholders, service subordinated debt, and cover operational expenses of the holding company. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to Bancorp. In the event that the Bank is unable to pay dividends to Bancorp, Bancorp may not be able to pay dividends to its shareholders or pay interest on the subordinated debentures. As a result, it could have an adverse effect on Bancorp's stock price and investment value.

Federal law would prohibit capital distributions from the Bank, with limited exceptions, if the Bank were categorized as "undercapitalized" under applicable Federal Reserve or FDIC regulations. In addition, as a California bank, Bank of Marin is subject to state law restrictions on the payment of dividends. For further information on the distribution limit from the Bank to Bancorp, see the section captioned “Bank Regulation” in ITEM 1 above and “Dividends” in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.

The Trading Volume of Bancorp's Common Stock is Less than That of Other, Larger Financial Services Companies

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market exchange. Our trading volume is less than that of nationwide or larger regional financial institutions. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity


and orderliness depends on the presence of willing buyers and sellers of common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the low trading volume of our common stock, significant trades of our stock in a given time, or the expectations of these trades, could cause volatility in the stock price.

We may need to Raise Additional Capital in the Future, and if we Fail to Maintain Sufficient Capital, Whether due to Losses, an Inability to Raise Additional Capital or Otherwise, our Financial Condition, Liquidity and Results of Operations, as well as our Ability to Maintain Regulatory Compliance, Could be Adversely Affected

We face significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution. We may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet our commitments and business needs, which could include the possibility of financing acquisitions. In addition, Bancorp, on a consolidated basis, and the Bank, on a stand-alone basis, must meet certain regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. Importantly, as discussed below, regulatory capital requirements could increase from current levels, which could require us to raise additional capital or contract our operations. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be Subject to more Stringent Capital Requirements in the Future

We are subject to regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that we must maintain. From time to time, the regulators change these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, Bancorp or the Bank may be restricted in the types of activities we may conduct and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions, such as paying dividends and repurchasing or redeeming capital securities. If we become subject to annual stress testing requirements, our stress test results may have the effect of requiring us to comply with even greater capital requirements. While we currently meet the requirements of the Basel III-based capital rules on a fully implemented basis, we may eventually fail to do so. In addition, these requirements could negatively affect our ability to lend, grow deposit balances, make acquisitions or make capital distributions in the form of dividends or share repurchases. Higher capital levels could also lower our return on equity.

We may be Subject to Environmental Liabilities in Connection with the Foreclosure on Real Estate Assets Securing our Loan Portfolio

Hazardous or toxic substances or other environmental hazards may be located on the properties that secure our loans. If we acquire such properties as a result of foreclosure or otherwise, we could become subject to various environmental liabilities. For example, we could be held liable for the cost of cleaning up or otherwise addressing contamination at or from these properties. We could also be held liable to a governmental entity or third party for property damage, personal injury or other claims relating to any environmental contamination at or from these properties. In addition, we own and operate certain properties that may be subject to similar environmental liability risks. Although we have policies and procedures that are designed to mitigate against certain environmental risks, we may not detect all environmental hazards associated with these properties. If we ever became subject to significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Small to Medium-sized Businesses that we Lend to may have Fewer Resources to Weather Adverse Business Developments, which may Impair a Borrower's Ability to Repay a Loan, and such Impairment could Adversely Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

We focus our business development and marketing strategy primarily on small to medium-sized businesses. Small to medium-sized businesses frequently have smaller market shares than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience substantial volatility in operating results, any of which may impair a borrower's ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small and medium-sized business often depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two people or a small group of people, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these people could adversely affect


the business and its ability to repay its loan. If general economic conditions negatively affect the California markets in which we operate and small to medium-sized businesses are adversely affected or our borrowers are otherwise affected by adverse business developments, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected.


A Lack of Liquidity could Adversely Affect our Operations and Jeopardize our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Liquidity is essential to our business. We rely on our ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the repayment and maturity schedules of our loans and investment securities, respectively, to ensure that we have adequate liquidity to fund our operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, securities sales, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our most important source of fundsfunding consists of deposits. Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments as providingprovide a better risk/return tradeoff.trade-off. If customers move money out of
14


bank deposits and into other investments, then we would lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing our funding costs and reducing our net interest income and net income.


Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, investment maturities and sales, loan repayments, and proceeds from the issuance and sale of any equity and debt securities to investors. Additional liquidity is provided by the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Federal Home Loan Bank and our ability to raise brokered deposits. We also may borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial institutions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities, or on terms that are acceptable to us, could be impaired by factors that affect us directly or the bank or non-bank financial services industries or the economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the bank or non-bank financial services industries.


Based on experience, we believe that our deposit accounts are relatively stable sources of funds. If we increase interest rates paid to retain deposits, our earnings may be adversely affected, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Any declineSignificant declines in available funding could adversely affect our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meetpay our expenses, and paydistribute dividends to our shareholders, orand fulfill our debt obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, anydemands. In addition, a lack of whichliquidity could result in the sale of securities in an unrealized loss position and/or alter our ability to hold our held-to-maturity securities to their maturity dates. All of these factors could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.


Earnings are Significantly Influenced by General Business and Economic Conditions

Our success depends, to a certain extent, on local, national and global economic and political conditions. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers primarily in Northern California with particular focus on the local markets in the San Francisco Bay and Greater Sacramento regions. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of our deposits as our primary funding source. Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding the economy and local business climate may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and saving habits, which may affect the demand for loans and other products and services we offer. Further, loan defaults that adversely affect our earnings correlate highly with deteriorating economic conditions (such as the California unemployment rate and California gross domestic product), which impact our borrowers' creditworthiness. In addition, health epidemics or pandemics (or expectations about them) such as the novel coronavirus (aka "COVID-19"), international trade disputes, inflation risks, oil price volatility, the level of U.S. debt and global economic conditions could destabilize financial markets in which we operate. Lastly, actions of the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the Federal Reserve could cause financial market volatility, which will affect the pricing of our loan and deposit products.

Interest Rate Risk is Inherent in Our Business

Our earnings are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are sensitive to many factors outside of our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the FOMC, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, can influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but can also affect (i) our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the duration of our securities and loan portfolios, and (iii) the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities. Our portfolio of loans and securities will generally decline in value if market interest rates increase, and increase in value if market interest rates decline. Decreases in the market value of investment securities available for sale negatively impact the Bank's tangible equity through accumulated other comprehensive losses. In addition, our loans and callable mortgage-backed securities are also subject to prepayment risk when interest rates fall, and the borrowers' credit risk may increase in rising rate or Eliminationrecessionary environments. Factors such as inflation, productivity, oil prices, unemployment rates, and global demand play a role in the FOMC's consideration of future rate adjustments.

15


In response to the evolving risks to economic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the FOMC made two emergency federal funds rate cuts totaling 150 basis points in March 2020. The federal funds rate range remained between 0.0% and 0.25% through the beginning of 2022, putting downward pressure on our asset yields and net interest margin. Beginning in March 2022, the FOMC began successive increases to the federal funds rate due to the evolving inflation risks, international political unrest, and oil and other supply chain disruptions. As a result of five rate adjustments during 2022 and one rate increase so far in 2023, the federal funds target rate range increased to a range of 4.50% to 4.75%. Additional rate increases are anticipated in 2023, as Federal Reserve policymakers continue to monitor inflation and economic developments.

See the Net Interest Income section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in ITEM 7 and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in ITEM 7A of this report for further discussion related to interest rate sensitivity and our management of interest rate risk.

Activities of Our Large Borrowers and Depositors May Cause Unexpected Volatilities in Our Loan and Deposit Balances, as well as Net Interest Margin

Loans originated at higher interest rates may be paid off and replaced by new loans with lower interest rates, causing downward pressure on our net interest margin. In addition, our top ten depositor relationships accounted for approximately 8% and 11% of our total deposit balances at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The business models and cash cycles of some of our large commercial depositors may also cause short-term volatility in their deposit balances held with us. As our customers' businesses grow, the dollar value of their daily activities may also grow leading to larger fluctuations in daily balances. Any long-term decline in deposit funding would adversely affect our liquidity. For additional information on our management of deposit volatility, refer to the Liquidity section of ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this report.

Unexpected Early Termination of Interest Rate Swap Agreements May Affect Earnings

We have entered into interest-rate swap agreements, primarily as an asset/liability risk management tool, in order to mitigate the interest rate risk that causes fluctuations in the fair value of specified long-term fixed-rate loans or firm commitments to originate long-term fixed rate loans. In the event of default by the borrowers on our hedged loans, we may have to terminate these designated interest-rate swap agreements early, resulting in market value losses that could negatively affect our earnings.

The Trading Volume of Bancorp's Common Stock May Be Less than That of Other, Larger Financial Services Companies

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market exchange. Our trading volume is less than that of nationwide or larger regional financial institutions. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence of willing buyers and sellers of common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the low trading volume of our common stock, significant trades of our stock in a given time, or the expectations of these trades, could cause volatility in the stock price.

We are Subject to Uncertainty from the Transition of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”('LIBOR") Could Adversely Affect our Financial Instruments with Interest Rates Currently Indexedas a Reference Rate

LIBOR has been one of the most widely used global interest rate benchmark deeply embedded in global financial products. The long-term viability of LIBOR has been undermined due to LIBOR

Regulators and law-enforcement agencies from a numbercases of governments, including entities in the United States, Japan, Canadarate manipulation, low volumes for underlying interbank transactions and the United Kingdom, have been conducting civil and criminal investigations into whether thereluctance of panel banks that contributed to the British Bankers’ Association (the “BBA”) in connection with the calculation of daily LIBOR may have underreported or otherwise manipulated or attemptedsubmit quotes used to manipulatecalculate LIBOR. Based onAs a review conducted byresult, the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom (the “FCA”) andannounced that the most commonly used LIBOR rates will cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. The publication of all other LIBOR settings ceased to be published as of December 31, 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), a consultation conductedsteering committee comprised of U.S. financial market participants selected by the European Commission, proposals have been madeFederal Reserve Bank of New York, published recommended fall-back language for governanceLIBOR-linked financial instruments and institutional reform, regulation, technical changes and contingency planning. In particular: (a) new legislation has been enacted in the United Kingdom pursuant to whichrecommended alternatives for certain LIBOR submissions and administration are now “regulated activities” and manipulation of LIBOR has been brought within the scoperates (e.g., Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a broad measure of the market abuse regime; (b) legislation has been proposed which if implemented would, among other things, alter the manner in which LIBOR is determined, compel more banks to provide LIBOR submissions,cost of overnight borrowings collateralized by Treasury securities, for USD LIBOR).

16


As of December 31, 2022, we had twenty-six investment securities with book values totaling $30.0 million, seven loans totaling $12.8 million, and require these submissions to be based on actual transaction data; and (c) LIBOR rates for certain currencies and maturities are no longer published daily. In addition, pursuant to authorization from the FCA, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (the “IBA”) took over the administrationfour interest rate swap contracts with notional values of LIBOR from the BBA on February 1, 2014.

In a speech on July 27, 2017, Andrew Bailey, the Chief Executive of the FCA, announced the FCA’s intention to cease sustaining LIBOR after 2021. The FCA has statutory powers to require panel banks to contribute to LIBOR where necessary. The FCA has decided not to ask, or to require, that panel banks continue to submit contributions to LIBOR beyond the end of 2021. The FCA has indicated that it expects that the current panel banks will voluntarily sustain LIBOR until the end of 2021. The FCA’s intention is that after 2021, it will no longer be necessary for the FCA to ask,


or to require, banks to submit contributions$12.0 million indexed to LIBOR. The FCA does not intendAlmost all of our LIBOR-indexed investment securities were issued by GSEs who are members of ARRC and have transition strategies and timelines for their legacy LIBOR-indexed investment products, including fall-back rates tied to sustain LIBOR through using its influence30-day average SOFR or legal powers beyond that date. While it is possible that the IBA and the panel banks could continue to produce LIBOR on the current basis after 2021, there is no assurance that LIBOR will survive in its current form,Term SOFR. We discontinued originating or at all.

We have floating ratepurchasing LIBOR-based loans and investment securities effective December 31, 2021. Loans currently indexed to LIBOR either have contractual fall-back rates or will be negotiated using replacement indices such as SOFR or Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index ("BSBY"), a benchmark developed by Bloomberg Professional Services. In addition, our interest rate swap agreements can either be subject to the fall-back index rate stipulated by the ISDA protocol or modified to other reference rates such as Prime or SOFR as mutually agreed by us and subordinated debentures whose interest rates areour counterparty.

While management has identified financial instruments indexed to LIBOR. We cannot predict the effect of the FCA’s decision not to sustain LIBOR or, if changes are ultimately made to LIBOR, the effect of those changes. In addition,and evaluated contracts and index alternatives, we cannot predict whatany favorable or unfavorable effects the chosen alternative index would be chosen, should this occur. If LIBOR in its current form does not survive or if an alternative index is chosen, the market value and/or liquidity of ourmay have on financial instruments that are currently indexed to LIBOR after its termination date.

Credit Risks

We are Subject to Significant Credit Risk and Loan Losses May Exceed Our Allowance for Credit Losses in the Future

The operation of our business requires us to manage credit risk. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our borrowers will be unable to repay their loans according to their terms, and that the collateral securing repayment of their loans, if any, may not be sufficient to ensure repayment. In addition, there are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers. In order to successfully manage credit risk, we must, among other things, maintain disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensure that our bankers follow those standards. The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as an attempt to attract higher yielding loans, a lack of discipline or diligence by our employees in underwriting and monitoring loans, the inability of our employees to adequately adapt policies and procedures to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting borrowers and the quality of our loan portfolio, may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance for credit losses on loans, each of which could adversely affect our net income. As a result, any inability to successfully manage credit risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We maintain allowances for credit losses on loans and unfunded loan commitments that represent management's best estimate of expected credit losses over the contractual lives of our loans under the current expected credit loss method. The level of the allowance reflects management's continuous evaluation of specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality and present and forecasted economic, political and regulatory conditions. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowances inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and trends and future economic forecasts, all of which may undergo material changes. Inaccurate assumptions in appraisals or an inappropriate choice of the valuation techniques may lead to an inadequate level of specific reserve or charge-offs.

The Small to Medium-sized Businesses that we Lend to may have Fewer Resources to Weather Adverse Economic and Other Developments, which may Impair a Borrower's Ability to Repay a Loan

We focus our business development and marketing strategy primarily on small to medium-sized businesses. Small to medium-sized businesses frequently have smaller market shares than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience substantial volatility in operating results, any of which may impair a borrower's ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small and medium-sized business often depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two people or a small group of people, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these people could adversely affect the business and its ability to repay its loan. If general economic conditions negatively affect the California markets in which we operate and small to medium-sized businesses are adversely affected or our borrowers are otherwise affected by adverse business developments, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected.
17


Negative Conditions Affecting Real Estate May Harm Our Business and Our Commercial Real Estate Concentration May Heighten Such Risk

Concentration of our lending activities in the California real estate sector could negatively affect our results of operations if adverse changes in our lending area occur. We do not offer traditional first mortgages, nor do we have sub-prime or Alt-A residential loans or significant amounts of securities backed by such loans in the portfolios. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 90% of our loans had real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral, with CRE comprising 77% and residential real estate the remaining 23%. Real estate valuations are influenced by demand, and demand is driven by economic factors such as employment rates and interest rates.

Loans secured by CRE include those secured by office buildings, owner-user office/warehouses, mixed-use commercial and retail properties. There can be no assurance that properties securing our loans will generate sufficient cash flows to allow borrowers to make full and timely loan payments to us. In recent years, commercial real estate markets have been particularly impacted by the economic disruption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Some pandemic-driven activity, such as shifts from in-person to online shopping and from office-based to remote work could affect long-term performance of some types of properties.

Rising CRE lending concentrations may expose institutions to unanticipated earnings and capital volatility in the event of adverse changes in the CRE market. Concentration risk exists when financial institutions deploy too many assets to any one industry or segment. Concentration stemming from commercial real estate is one area of regulatory concern. The CRE Concentration Guidance provides supervisory criteria, including the following numerical indicators, to assist bank examiners in identifying banks with potentially significant commercial real estate loan concentrations that may warrant greater supervisory scrutiny: (i) commercial real estate loans exceeding 300% of capital and increasing 50% or more in the preceding three years; or (ii) construction and land development loans exceeding 100% of capital. The CRE Concentration Guidance does not limit banks’ levels of commercial real estate lending activities, but rather guides institutions in developing risk management practices and levels of capital that are commensurate with the level and nature of their commercial real estate concentrations. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, using regulatory definitions in the CRE Concentration Guidance, our CRE loans represented 307% and 332%, respectively, of our total risk-based capital. We are actively working to manage our CRE concentration and we have discussed the CRE Concentration Guidance with the regulatory agencies and believe that our underwriting policies, management information systems, independent credit administration process, and monitoring of real estate loan concentrations are currently sufficient to address the CRE Concentration Guidance.

Accounting Estimates and Risk Management Processes Rely on Analytical and Forecasting Models

The processes we use to estimate expected credit losses on loans and investment securities, and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on our financial condition and results of operations, depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. These models reflect assumptions that may not be accurate, particularly in times of market volatility or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are adequate, the models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models we use for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, we may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market factors. If the models we use for determining our expected credit losses on loans and investment securities are inadequate, the allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the models we use to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what we could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Any such failure in our analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Investment Securities May Lose Value due to Credit Quality of the Issuers

We invest in significant portions of debt securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises ("GSE"), such as Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"). We also hold mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) issued by FNMA and FHLMC, both of which have been under U.S. government conservatorship since 2008. While we consider FNMA and FHLMC securities to have low credit risk as they carry the explicit backing of the U.S. government due to the conservatorship, they are not direct obligations of the U.S. government. The fair value of our securities issued or
18


guaranteed by these two GSE entities may be negatively impacted if the U.S. government ceases to provide support to the conservatorship or phases out its current practice of purchasing treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities. GSE debt is sponsored but not guaranteed by the federal government and carries implicit backing, whereas government agencies such as Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") are divisions of the government whose securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

Although Congress has taken steps to improve regulation and consumer protection related to the housing finance system (e.g., Dodd-Frank Act), FNMA and FHLMC have entered their 15th year of U.S. government conservatorship via the Federal Housing Finance Agency (the "FHFA"). While proposals to end the conservatorship have considered solutions such as an initial public offering, at the date of this report, its future and ultimate impact on the financial markets and our investments in GSEs are uncertain.

While we generally seek to minimize our exposure by strategically diversifying our credit exposure to obligations of issuers in various geographic locations throughout California and the U.S., investing in investment grade securities and actively monitoring the credit worthiness of the issuers and/or credit guarantee providers, there is no guarantee that the issuers will remain financially sound or continue their payments on these debentures.

Operational and Other Risks

Risks Associated with Cybersecurity Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings and Reputation

Our business requires the secure management of sensitive client and bank information. We work diligently to implement security measures that intend to make our communications and information systems safe to conduct business. Cyber threats such as social engineering, ransomware, and phishing emails are more prevalent now than ever before. These incidents include intentional and unintentional events that may present threats designed to disrupt operations, corrupt data, release sensitive information or cause denial-of-service attacks. A cybersecurity breach of systems operated by the Bank, merchants, vendors, customers, or externally publicized breaches of other financial institutions may significantly harm our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and financial liability. While we have systems and procedures designed to prevent security breaches, we cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access will not compromise or breach the technology protecting our networks or proprietary client information. If a material security breach were to occur, the Bank has policies and procedures in place to ensure timely disclosure.

The Financial Services Industry is Undergoing Rapid Technological Changes and, As a Result, We Have a Continuing Need to Stay Current with Those Changes to Compete Effectively and Increase Our Efficiencies. We May Not Have the Resources to Implement New Technology to Stay Current with These Changes
The financial services industry is undergoing technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to providing better client service, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and reduces operational costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands securely and cost-effectively. In connection with implementing new technology enhancements and/or products, we may experience operational challenges (e.g. human error, system error, incompatibility) which could result in us not fully realizing the anticipated benefits from such new technology or require us to incur significant costs to remedy any such challenges in a timely manner.

Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

Concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. As a result, political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. The U.S. government, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies are likely to continue to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. These initiatives and increasing supervisory expectations may require the Company to expend significant capital and incur compliance, operating, maintenance and remediation costs. In addition, given the lack of empirical data on the credit and other financial risks posed by climate change, it is impossible to predict how climate change may impact our financial condition and operations. As a banking organization, the physical effects of climate change may present certain unique risks. For example, our primary market is located in both earthquake and wildfire-prone
19


zones in Northern California, which is also subject to other weather or disasters, such as severe rainstorms, drought or flood. These events have interrupted our business operations unexpectedly (e.g., PG&E power shutoffs in the North Bay and Sacramento Region) at times. Climate-related physical changes and hazards could also pose credit risks for us. For example, our borrowers may have collateral properties or operations located in areas at risk of wildfires, or coastal areas at risk to rising sea levels and erosion, or subject to the risk of drought in California. The properties pledged as collateral on our loan portfolio could also be damaged by tsunamis, landslides, floods, earthquakes or wildfires and thereby the recoverability of loans could be impaired. A number of factors can affect credit losses, including the extent of damage to the collateral, the extent of damage not covered by insurance, the extent to which unemployment and other economic conditions caused by the natural disaster adversely affected.affect the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, and the cost of collection and foreclosure to us. Additionally, there could be increased insurance premiums and deductibles, or a decrease in the availability of coverage, due to severe weather-related losses. The ultimate outcome on our business of a natural disaster, whether or not caused by climate change, is difficult to predict but could have a material adverse effect on financial condition, results of operations or profitability.


We Rely on Third-Party Vendors for Important Aspects of Our Operation

We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information and systems provided by certain key vendors, including but not limited to data processing, payroll processing, technology support, investment safekeeping and accounting. For example, we outsource core processing to Fidelity Information Services ("FIS") and wire processing to Finastra, which are leading financial services solution providers that allow us access to competitive technology offerings without having to invest in their development. Our ability to operate, as well as our financial condition and results of operations, could be negatively affected in the event of an interruption of an information system, an undetected error, a cyber-breach, or in the event of a natural disaster whereby certain vendors are unable to maintain business continuity.

Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Banks and Bank Holding Companies are Subject to Extensive Government Regulation and Supervision

Bancorp and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state governmental supervision, regulation and control. Holding company regulations affect the range of activities in which Bancorp is engaged. Banking regulations affect the Bank's lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, and compliance costs among other things. Compliance risk is the current and prospective risk to earnings or capital arising from violations of, or non-conformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, internal policies and procedures, or ethical standards set forth by regulators. Compliance risk also arises in situations where the laws or rules governing certain bank products or activities of our clients may be ambiguous or untested. This risk exposes Bancorp and the Bank to potential fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding of contracts. Compliance risk can lead to diminished reputation, reduced franchise value, limited business opportunities, reduced expansion potential and an inability to enforce contracts. The Bank manages these risks through its extensive compliance plan, policies and procedures. For further information on supervision and regulation, see the section captioned “SUPERVISION AND REGULATION” in ITEM 1 of this report.

20



ITEM 1B1B.      UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None


ITEM 22.     PROPERTIES


We lease our corporate headquarters building in Novato, California, which houses substantial loan production, operations, Wealth Management and Trust Services and administration.  We also lease other branch orand office facilities within our primary market areas in the cities of Corte Madera, San Rafael, Novato, Sausalito, Mill Valley, Tiburon, Greenbrae, Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Healdsburg, Sonoma, Napa, San Francisco, Alameda, Oakland, Walnut Creek, San Mateo, Gold River, Jackson, Pioneer, Roseville, and Oakland.  We consider our properties to be suitable and adequate for our needs.Sacramento.  For additional information on properties, see Notesrefer to Note 4, Bank Premises and Equipment, and Note 12, to the Consolidated Financial Statements includedCommitments and Contingencies, in ITEM 8 of this report.



ITEM 33.         LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We may be party to legal actions that arise from time to time as part of the normal course of our business.  We believe, after consultation with legal counsel, that we have meritorious defenses in these actions, and thatFor information on litigation contingent liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
We are responsible for our proportionate share of certain litigation indemnifications provided to Visa U.S.A. by its member banks in connection with lawsuits related to anti-trust charges and interchange fees. For further details,matters, see Note 12, to the Consolidated Financial StatementsCommitments and Contingencies, in ITEM 8 of this report.


ITEM 44.      MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

21




PART II     
 
ITEM 55.      MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


BancorpMarket Information and Holders

Bancorp's common stock trades on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol BMRC. At February 28, 2018, 6,970,4462023, 16,056,334 shares of Bancorp's common stock, no par value, were outstanding and held by approximately 2,9007,150 holders of record and beneficial owners. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low intra-day sales prices of Bancorp's common stock.
Calendar20172016
 QuarterHigh
Low
High
Low
1st Quarter
$72.50
$63.25
$54.50
$45.65
2nd Quarter
$69.95
$59.05
$51.61
$47.16
3rd Quarter
$70.75
$60.95
$52.47
$47.25
4th Quarter
$77.90
$63.90
$75.05
$49.25

The table below shows cash dividends paid to common shareholders on a quarterly basis in the last two fiscal years.
Calendar20172016
 QuarterPer Share
Dollars
Per Share
Dollars
1st Quarter
$0.27
$1,655
$0.25
$1,518
2nd Quarter
$0.27
$1,661
$0.25
$1,526
3rd Quarter
$0.29
$1,788
$0.25
$1,528
4th Quarter
$0.29
$1,792
$0.27
$1,651
 $1.12
$6,896
$1.02
$6,223

On January 19, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.29 per share, payable on February 9, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 2, 2018. For additional information regarding our ability to pay dividends, see discussion in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the heading “Dividends,” in ITEM 8 of this report.

There were no purchases made by or on behalf of Bancorp or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of the Bancorp's common stock during the fourth quarter of 2017.

On July 6, 2017, Bancorp executed a shareholder rights agreement (“Rights Agreement”), which expires July 23, 2022, designed to discourage takeovers that involve abusive tactics or do not provide fair value to shareholders. For further information, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the heading “Preferred Stock and Shareholder Rights Plan” in ITEM 8 of this report.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2017, with respect to equity compensation plans. All plans have been approved by the shareholders.
 
Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options1

Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options
Shares remaining available for future issuance 2
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders258,968
$40.84
219,414
1 Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options under the Bank of Marin Bancorp 2017 Equity Plan and 2007 Equity Plan.
2 Represents remaining shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2017 Equity Plan and the 2010 Director Stock Plan, excluding 258,968 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and 192,453 shares available to be issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.




Five-Year Stock Price Performance Graph


The following graph, compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence of New York, New York, shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock during the five fiscal years ended December 31, 20172022 compared to the Russell 2000 Stock index and the SNL Bank $1B - $5BS&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. The comparison assumes the investment of $100 in our common stock on December 31, 20122017 and the reinvestment of all dividends. The graph represents past performance and does not indicate future performance. In addition, total return performance results vary depending on the length of the performance period.

bmrc-20221231_g1.jpg
201720182019202020212022
Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC)100.00 123.25 137.19 107.42 119.51 108.62 
Russell 2000 Index100.00 88.99 111.70 134.00 153.85 122.41 
S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index 1
100.00 81.23 103.68 96.33 134.76 114.88 
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
1 The index comprises stocks in the S&P Total Market Index that are classified in the Global Industry Classification Standard regional banks sub-industry.

22


 2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC)100.00
117.90
145.42
150.33
200.41
198.70
Russell 2000 Index100.00
138.82
145.62
139.19
168.85
193.58
SNL Bank $1B - $5B Index 1
100.00
145.41
152.04
170.20
244.85
261.04
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence 
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

1 Includes all Major Exchange (NYSE, NYSE MKT, and Nasdaq) banks in S&P Global's coverage universe with $1 billion to $5 billion in assets as of the most recent available financial data.


ITEM 6        SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


The following data has been derived fromtable summarizes information as of December 31, 2022, with respect to equity compensation plans.
Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options1
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options
Shares remaining available for future issuance 2
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders287,228 $32.81 1,047,491
1 Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options under the audited consolidated financial statements of Bank of Marin Bancorp. For additional information, referBancorp 2017 Equity Plan and 2007 Equity Plan.
2 Represents remaining shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2017 Equity Plan and the 2020 Director Stock Plan, excluding 287,228 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and 375,450 shares available to be issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On July 16, 2021, Bancorp Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program under which Bancorp could repurchase up to $25.0 million of its outstanding common stock through July 31, 2023. On October 22, 2021, Bancorp's Board of Directors approved an amendment to the current share repurchase program, which increased the total authorization from $25.0 million to $57.0 million and left the expiration date unchanged.

In January 2022, the last activity under the program, Bancorp repurchased 23,275 shares at an average price of $37.64 per share for a total cost of $877 thousand. Cumulative repurchases under the current program totaled 618,991 shares at an average price of $36.04 per share. A total of $34.7 million remained available to repurchase under the program as of December 31, 2022.
ITEM 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and ITEM 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.6.     [RESERVED]

 At December 31,
(in thousands)20172016201520142013
Selected financial condition data:     
Total assets$2,468,154
$2,023,493
$2,031,134
$1,787,130
$1,805,194
Loans, net1,663,246
1,471,174
1,436,299
1,348,252
1,255,098
Deposits2,148,670
1,772,700
1,728,226
1,551,619
1,587,102
Borrowings5,739
5,586
72,395
20,185
19,969
Stockholders' equity297,025
230,563
214,473
200,026
180,887
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)20172016201520142013
Selected operating data:     
Net interest income$74,852
$73,161
$67,187
$70,441
$58,775
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses500
(1,850)500
750
540
Non-interest income8,268
9,161
9,193
9,041
8,066
Non-interest expense 1
53,782
47,692
46,949
47,263
44,092
Net income 1
15,976
23,134
18,441
19,771
14,270
Net income per common share:     
Basic$2.58
$3.81
$3.09
$3.35
$2.62
Diluted$2.55
$3.78
$3.04
$3.29
$2.57
 At or for the Years Ended December 31,
 20172016201520142013
Performance and other financial ratios:     
Return on average assets0.75%1.15%0.98%1.08%0.96%
Return on average equity6.49%10.23%8.84%10.31%8.86%
Tax-equivalent net interest margin3.80%3.91%3.83%4.13%4.20%
Efficiency ratio64.70%57.93%61.47%59.46%65.97%
Loan-to-deposit ratio78.14%83.86%83.97%87.87%79.98%
Cash dividend payout ratio on common stock 2
43.41%26.77%29.10%23.90%27.90%
Cash dividends per common share$1.12
$1.02
$0.90
$0.80
$0.73
Asset quality ratios:     
Allowance for loan losses to total loans0.94%1.04%1.03%1.11%1.12%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans 3
38.88x
106.5x
6.88x
1.61x
1.22x
Non-performing loans to total loans 3
0.02%0.01%0.15%0.69%0.92%
Capital ratios:     
Equity to total assets ratio12.03%11.39%10.60%11.20%10.00%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)14.91%14.32%13.37%13.94%13.21%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)14.04%13.37%12.44%12.87%12.18%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)12.13%11.39%10.67%10.62%10.78%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)13.75%13.07%12.16%N/A
N/A
Other data:     
Number of full service offices23
20
20
21
21
Full time equivalent employees291
262
259
260
281
1 2017, 2014 and 2013 included $2.2 million, $746 thousand and $3.7 million, respectively, in merger-related expenses.
2 Calculated as dividends on common shares divided by basic net income per common share.
3 Non-performing loans include loans on non-accrual status and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.


ITEM 77.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion of financial condition as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 and results of operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20172022 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, included in Part II ITEM 8 of this report. Average balances, including balances used in calculating certain financial ratios, are generally comprised of average daily balances.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
The disclosures set forth in this item are qualified by important factors detailed in Part I captioned Forward-Looking Statements and ITEM 1A captioned Risk Factors of this report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in the report.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Critical accounting policiesestimates are those estimates made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that involve a significant level of estimation and uncertainty and have had or are both very importantreasonably likely to the portrayal ofhave a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations and require Management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because ofoperations. We consider accounting estimates to be critical to our financial results if (i) the needaccounting estimate requires management to make estimatesassumptions about the effect of matters that are inherentlyhighly uncertain, (ii) management could have applied different assumptions during the reported period, and imprecise.

(iii) changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to occur in the future and could have a material impact on our financial statements. Management has determined the following four accounting estimates and related policies to be critical:critical.


Allowance for LoanCredit Losses: on Loans and Unfunded Commitments

The allowance for credit losses on loans is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date to present the net amount of loans expected to be collected. The allowance for losses on unfunded loan commitments is based on estimates of probability that these commitments will be drawn upon according to historical utilization experience, expected loss severity and loss rates as determined for pooled funded loans. The allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments is a liability account included in interest payable and other liabilities. Management estimates these allowances quarterly using relevant available information, from
23


internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Credit loss experience among the Bank and peer groups provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses.

The allowance for credit losses ("ACL") model utilizes a discounted cash flow ("DCF") method to measure the expected credit losses on loans collectively evaluated that are sub-segmented by loan pools with similar credit risk characteristics, which generally correspond to federal regulatory reporting codes. In addition, the DCF method incorporates assumptions for probability of default ("PD"), loss given default ("LGD"), and prepayments and curtailments over the contractual terms of the loans. Under the DCF method, the ACL reflects the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows using the loan's effective rate.

Management considers whether adjustments to the quantitative portion of the ACL are needed for differences in segment-specific risk characteristics or to reflect the extent to which it expects current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions to differ from the conditions that existed during the historical period included in the development of PD and LGD.

Our allowance model is particularly sensitive to forecasted and seasonally-adjusted actual California unemployment rates, which decreased to 4.1% at December 31, 2022 from 5.8% at December 31, 2021. The ACL model incorporates a one-year forecast. For periods beyond the forecast horizon the economic factors revert to historical averages on a straight-line basis over a one-year period. We performed a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2022 and determined that a 1% change (e.g., 4.5% to 5.5%) in the forecasted quarterly unemployment rates over the next four quarters resulted in a 6% change to our allowance for credit losses on loans. This impact does not consider other assumption changes to either the quantitative factors, such as probability of default, loss given default, loan mix or cash flows, prepayment/curtailment rates, and individually analyzed loans, or qualitative factors as discussed in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Additionally, because current economic conditions and forecasts can change, as future events are inherently difficult to predict, the estimated credit losses on loans and unfunded commitments could change significantly.

While we believe we use the best information available to determine the allowance for credit losses, our results of operations could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance. For information regarding critical estimates related to our ALLLallowance for credit losses methodology, the related provision for loancredit losses, and risks related to asset quality and lending activity, see ITEM 1A - Risk Factors,, the Allowance for Credit Losses section in ITEM 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,, and Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses in ITEM 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.


Other-than-temporary Impairment of Investment Securities: For information regarding our investment securities, investment activity, and related risks, see ITEM 1A - Risk Factors, ITEM 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2 - Investment Securities in ITEM 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for Income Taxes:

We are subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states, and the municipalities in which we operate. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by us and the government taxing authorities. We review our provision for income tax expense monthly and calculate the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities quarterly. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. In addition, our estimates include making judgements about when future items will affect taxable income. Although management believes that the judgments and estimates used are reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. For further information on our tax assets and liabilities, and related provision for income taxes, see Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 11 - Income Taxes in ITEM 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.


Fair Value Measurements: For information on our

We use of fair value measurements to record certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures. Available-for-sale securities and interest rate swap agreements are financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, we record at fair value other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis such as collateral dependent loans and other real estate owned. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve write-downs of, or specific reserves against, individual assets. We group our relatedassets and liabilities that are measured at fair value into three levels within the fair value hierarchy, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities
24


within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodologies, seemethodology used in the measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-driven or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our estimates about market data. The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market data. For financial instruments that trade actively and have quoted market prices or observable market data, there is minimal subjectivity involved in measuring fair value. When observable market prices and data are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. In addition, changes in the market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. Therefore, when market data is not available, we use valuation techniques that require more management judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value measurement. Fair value is discussed further in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities in ITEM 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.




Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting where the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. The purchase price allocation process requires significant judgment in the estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Management may obtain third-party valuations such as appraisals or discounted cash flow analyses, or we may derive fair values internally using techniques as discussed in Fair Value Measurements above. Management assesses qualifications of third-party valuation specialists, reviews assumptions applied and takes responsibility for the results of fair value estimates. Merger-related expenses include costs directly related to merger activity such as legal and professional fees, system consolidation and conversion costs, and compensation costs associated with employee severance and retention incentives. We account for merger-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services received. Accounting policies and estimates are discussed further in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 18 - Merger in ITEM 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

25


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Financial Highlights

The following are highlights of our financial condition and results of operations. The data was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Bank of Marin Bancorp.
At December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)20222021
Selected financial condition data:
Total assets$4,147,464 $4,314,209 
Investment securities$1,774,303 $1,509,790 
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses on loans 1
$2,069,563 $2,232,622 
Deposits$3,573,348 $3,808,550 
Borrowings and other obligations$112,439 $419 
Stockholders' equity$412,092 $450,368 
Asset quality ratios:
Allowance for credit losses to total loans1.10 %1.02 %
Allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding SBA PPP loans 2
1.10 %1.07 %
Allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans9.45x2.75x
Non-accrual loans to total loans0.12 %0.37 %
Capital ratios:
Tangible common equity to tangible assets8.21 %8.76 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)15.90 %14.58 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)15.02 %13.70 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)9.60 %8.85 %
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)15.02 %13.70 %
Other data:
Loan-to-deposit ratio58.56 %59.23 %
Number of branches3131
Full-time equivalent employees313328
For the Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)202220212020
Selected operating data:
Net interest income$127,492 $104,951 $96,659 
(Reversals of) provision for credit losses on loans and unfunded loan commitments, net(381)(2,441)6,164 
Non-interest income10,905 10,132 8,550 
Non-interest expense 3
75,269 72,638 58,458 
Net income 3
46,586 33,228 30,242 
Net income per common share:
Basic$2.93 $2.32 $2.24 
Diluted$2.92 $2.30 $2.22 
Performance and other financial ratios:
Return on average assets1.08 %0.94 %1.04 %
Return on average equity11.16 %8.43 %8.60 %
Tax-equivalent net interest margin3.11 %3.17 %3.55 %
Cost of deposits0.06 %0.07 %0.11 %
Efficiency ratio54.39 %63.12 %55.56 %
Cash dividend payout ratio on common stock 4
33.45 %40.52 %41.07 %
Cash dividends per common share$0.98 $0.94 $0.92 
1 Includes SBA PPP loans of $3.5 million at December 31, 2022 and $111.2 million at December 31, 2021.
2 The allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding SBA-guaranteed PPP loans, is considered a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure, as it represents only those loans that were considered in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses. Refer to footnote 1 above for SBA PPP totals.
3 2022 and 2021 included $858 thousand (or $604 thousand, net of taxes) and $6.5 million (or $4.9 million, net of taxes), respectively, in merger-related and conversion costs.
4 Calculated as dividends on common shares divided by basic net income per common share.
26



Executive Summary

Annual earnings were $16.0$46.6 million in 20172022 compared to $23.1$33.2 million in 2016.2021. Diluted earnings were $2.55 per share for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $3.78$2.92 per share in the same period of 2016.2022, compared to $2.30 per share in 2021.


The following are highlights of operating and financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2017:2022:
In 2017, Bank of Marin acquired Bank of Napa.
Merger-related and conversion costs reduced net income by $604 thousand, or 4 cents per share in 2022, compared to $4.9 million, or 34 cents per share in 2021. As a result, Bank of Marin is the largest community bank in Napa County by deposit share. This is the third acquisitionshown in the past six yearsreconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures on page 28, year-to-date return on average assets of 1.08% and return on average equity of 11.16% excluding these costs would have been 1.10% and 11.31%, respectively, compared to 1.08% and 9.67%, respectively, in 2021.

Loans decreased by $163.1 million in 2022, or 7%, to $2.093 billion as of December 31, 2022, from $2.256 billion as of December 31, 2021. Loan originations of $240.2 million in 2022 were the second highest on record, while payoffs were uncharacteristically high. Payoffs included both Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") loans and $258.5 million of non-PPP loans, many of which were outside the Bank's control and resulted from activities such as sales of businesses and properties, cash repayments, and project completions. Shortly after December 31, we originated $45 million in commercial loans that strengthenswere in process at year-end, $20 million of which was syndicated to a participant bank.

Credit quality remained strong and improved during 2022, with classified loans decreasing $8.1 million and non-accrual loans representing 0.12% of the Bank’s presencetotal loans as of December 31, 2022, compared to 0.37% as of December 31, 2021. Non-accrual loans dropped by $5.9 million (or 71%) in the San Francisco Bay Area. Additionally, we expanded our presence in Sonoma County by opening our Healdsburg office.
Earnings in 2017 included a $3.0 million one-time deferred tax asset write-down2022, substantially due to the enactmentpayoff of three commercial real estate loans from two borrowers. Subsequent to year-end, an additional $1.2 million in non-accrual loans paid off. In 2022 and 2021, we recorded net reversals of the new federal tax lawprovision for credit losses on December 22, 2017,loans of $63 thousand and expenses related$1.4 million, respectively. In addition, in 2022 and 2021, we recorded net reversals of the provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments of $318 thousand and $992 thousand, respectively.

Deposits decreased by $235.2 million to the acquisition$3.573 billion as of Bank of Napa. Without these expenses, diluted earnings per share ("EPS") would have been $3.28 for the full year, and net income would have been $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Refer2022, compared to table on$3.809 billion as of December 31, 2021, as the following page forBank continued to carefully manage deposit costs. The decline was a detailed reconciliationresult of these financial measures presented according to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) vs. non-GAAP. Additionally, annual earnings in 2016 were higher than 2017anticipated outflows due to loan recoveriesplanned business activities by a few large clients and early payoffsome customers moving into alternative investments. At the end of several acquired loans purchased2021, the Bank held $347.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, and $173.1 million in off-balance sheet amounts with deposit networks in anticipation of expected and potential unexpected deposit outflows during 2022. There were no balances held with deposit networks at a discount, which positively impacted the 2016 EPS by $0.47.
The Bank achieved organic loan growthend of $59.5 million, or 4.0% in 2017. Including loans acquired from Bank2022. Despite the decrease, non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits increased slightly to 51.5% as of Napa, the total loan portfolio grew 12.9% from $1,486.6 million at December 31, 20162022, compared to $1,679.0 million at50.2% as of December 31, 2017. In early 2018, we are funding loans carried over2021. Cost of deposits remained low at 0.06% in 2022, down slightly from 0.07% in 2021.

Net interest income totaled $127.5 million and $105.0 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The $22.5 million increase from the prior year as we continue to rebuild our pipeline.
Organic deposit growth was $144.5 million, or 8.2% for the year. Combined organic growth and deposits acquired from Bank of Napa resulted in 21.2% total deposit growth to $2,148.7 millionat December 31, 2017, compared to $1,772.7 million at December 31, 2016. Non-interest bearing deposits, including those acquired, grew by $197.1 million in 2017 and made up 47% of total deposits at year end. Cost of total deposits remained low at 0.07% despite three short-term interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee in 2017.
Strong credit quality remains a cornerstone of the Bank’s consistent performance. Non-accrual loans represent 0.02% of the Bank's loan portfolio as of December 31, 2017. A $500 thousand provision for loan losses was recorded in the fourth quarter due to continuing loan growth and elevated risk factors associated with the unknown long-term impacts of the 2017 North Bay wildfires and effects of the Bank of Napa acquisition.
While the long-term impact of the October 2017 wildfires on the North Bay economy is still unknown, the immediate impact to our loan portfolio and to our customer base was minimal. Bank of Marin is committed to helping our customers and our communities recover and rebuild.
Net interest income totaled $74.9 million and $73.2 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase of $1.7 million in 2017 is primarily due to an increasehigher balances in the investment securities and commercial real estate loan portfolios, a full year of net interest income from acquired earning assets of $114.4 million, partially offset by a decreaseAmerican River Bankshares ("AMRB"), compared to five months in gains on payoffs2021, and accretion on purchased loans, and athe early redemption of subordinated debt that generated $1.4 million of interest recoveryexpense in 2016.2021. The tax equivalenttax-equivalent net interest margin decreased by 6 basis points to 3.80%3.11% in 20172022, compared to 3.91%3.17% in 2016 for2021, as the same reasons. Referproportion of average investment securities to the Net Interest Income section below for information on the tax equivalent net interest marginaverage total interest-earning assets grew from 26% in 2021 to 44% in 2022 and the reported net interest margin.
fee income from PPP loans declined.
The effective tax rate of 44.6% for the year was elevated by 10.5 percentage points due to the deferred tax asset write-down. Without this charge, the effective tax rate would have been slightly lower than the previous years.
The efficiency ratio was 64.7% for54.39% in 2022, compared to 63.12% in 2021. As shown in the full year, upreconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures on page 28, the efficiency ratios excluding merger-related and conversion costs would have been 53.77% and 57.51% in 2022 and 2021, respectively.

After careful consideration, the Bank decided to close four brick-and-mortar branch locations in March 2023. The acquisition of American River Bankshares resulted in an overlap in the Bank’s branch network in Santa Rosa and Healdsburg, prompting branch consolidations within Northern Sonoma County. In addition, our
27


Tiburon and Buckhorn branches in Southern Marin and Amador counties are close to other branches that can serve our customers. These closures fulfill the remaining expense savings anticipated from 57.9%the acquisition, improve efficiency and optimize our delivery channels while generating savings that will help to fund strategic initiatives going forward. The expected pre-tax savings in 2016. Acquisition expenses increased2023 from the efficiency ratio by 2.7 percentage points for the year. We expectbranch closures, net of accelerated costs, is approximately $1.0 million in additional acquisition-related expenses in 2018.$470 thousand, and future annual pre-tax savings are expected to be approximately $1.4 million.




For the year ended December 31, 2017, return on assets ("ROA") was 0.75% and return on equity ("ROE") was 6.49%. Acquisition expenses and the deferred tax asset write-down reduced ROA by 0.22 percentage points and ROE by 1.86 percentage points.

All capital ratios are wellwere above regulatory requirements for a well-capitalized institution. The total risk-based capital ratio for Bancorp was 14.9%15.9% at December 31, 2017, compared to 14.3%2022 and 14.6% at December 31, 2016.

Looking forward into the new year, the investments we made2021. Tangible common equity to tangible assets declined to 8.2% at December 31, 2022 from 8.8% at December 31, 2021, primarily due to $71.7 million increase in both organic growthafter-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities associated with interest rate changes since December 31, 2021, partially offset by incremental earnings and the Bank of Napa acquisitionsmaller balance sheet in 2017 should position us very well for 2018.
2022. The reduced tax rate resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 presents an opportunitytotal risk-based capital ratio for the Bank was 15.7% at December 31, 2022 and 14.4% at December 31, 2021.

The Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per share on January 20, 2023. This is the 71stconsecutive quarterly dividend paid by Bank of Marin Bancorp. The cash dividend was paid on February 10, 2023 to consider or accelerate certain strategies,shareholders of record at the close of business on February 3, 2023.

As recent events in the marketplace unfold, including potential value-added investments, changes to our dividend policy or other capital actions.   Additionally, in January 2018,the closures of Silicon Valley Bank on March 10, 2023 followed by Signature Bank on March 12, 2023, the Bank awarded special bonusesremains focused on our banking relationships. We believe our deposit franchise is sound, with a focus on core deposits from community-based customers with whom we have strong relationships. Those relationships are centered around the needs of local corporations, business operators and real estate investors, with very little exposure to staff in recognitiontechnology start-up companies and no exposure to digital assets, two areas of their consistent contributionsrisk that strongly influenced the aforementioned closures. On March 13, 2023, we initiated an outreach effort to answer our customers' questions or concerns about the recent events, strengths of the Bank, and other matters such as FDIC insurance coverage. In February 2023, we enhanced our borrowing capacity at the FHLB by pledging certain held-to-maturity securities to the Bank's ongoing success.Securities-Backed Credit Program, increasing our total immediate contingent funding sources to approximately $2.0 billion, or 59% of total deposits as of February 28, 2023. The Bank also has the option to add another $267 million to its borrowing capacity through the Federal Reserve’s new Bank Term Funding Program ("BTFP").
We have ample liquidity and capital to support organic growth and acquisitions in coming years.
As part of its organic growth plan, the Bank expanded its executive and lending teams with several strategic hires in 2017, including a Chief Operating Officer and a Commercial Banking Regional Manager for the Bank’s Napa and Sonoma markets.
28

Acquisitions remain a component of our strategic plan and we will continue to evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities that fit with our culture and add value for our shareholders.

Our disciplined credit culture and relationship-focused banking continue to be critical components of our success.
Statement regarding useRegarding Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this Form 10-K, Bancorp's financial results are presented in accordance with GAAP and refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures

measures. Management believes that presentation of operating results using non-GAAP financial measures provides useful supplemental information to investors and facilitates the analysis of Bancorp's core operating results and comparison of operating results across reporting periods. Management also uses non-GAAP financial measures to establish budgets and manage Bancorp's business. A reconciliation of the GAAP financial resultsmeasures to comparable non-GAAP financial resultsmeasures is included in the following table.presented below.

Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Year ended December 31,
(in thousands, except share data; unaudited)202220212020
Net income
Net income (GAAP)$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Merger-related and conversion costs:
Personnel and severance393 3,005 — 
Professional services67 1,976 — 
Data processing77 1,127 — 
Other321 350 — 
Total merger costs before tax benefits858 6,458 — 
Income tax benefit of merger-related expenses(254)(1,547)— 
Total merger-related and conversion costs, net of tax benefits604 4,911 — 
Comparable net income (non-GAAP)$47,190 $38,139 $30,242 
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average diluted shares15,969 14,422 13,617 
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP)$2.92 $2.30 $2.22 
Merger-related and conversion costs, net of tax benefits0.04 0.34 — 
Comparable diluted earnings per share (non-GAAP)$2.96 $2.64 $2.22 
Return on average assets
Average assets$4,304,511 $3,537,163 $2,897,165 
Return on average assets (GAAP)1.08 %0.94 %1.04 %
Comparable return on average assets (non-GAAP)1.10 %1.08 %1.04 %
Return on average equity
Average stockholders' equity$417,344 $394,363 $351,494 
Return on average equity (GAAP)11.16 %8.43 %8.60 %
Comparable return on average equity (non-GAAP)11.31 %9.67 %8.60 %
Efficiency ratio
Non-interest expense (GAAP)$75,269 $72,638 $58,458 
Merger-related expenses(858)(6,458)— 
Non-interest expense (non-GAAP)$74,411 $66,180 $58,458 
Net interest income$127,492 $104,951 $96,659 
Non-interest income$10,905 $10,132 $8,550 
Efficiency ratio (GAAP)54.39 %63.12 %55.56 %
Comparable efficiency ratio (non-GAAP)53.77 %57.51 %55.56 %
29
Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures 
 Years ended
(in thousands, unaudited)December 31, 2017December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
Net income (GAAP)$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Acquisition-related expenses2,209


Tax effect associated with acquisition-related expenses               (657)


Deferred tax asset write-down              3,017


Comparable net income (Non-GAAP)$20,545
$23,134
$18,441
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP)$2.55
$3.78
$3.04
Acquisition-related expenses                0.35


Tax effect associated with acquisition-related expenses              (0.10)


Deferred tax asset write-down                0.48


Comparable diluted earnings per share (Non-GAAP)$3.28
$3.78
$3.04



Following is a description of the adjustments made to GAAP financial measures:

Acquisition-related costs: Costs related to closing and integration of the acquired bank.

Tax expense associated with write-down of the net deferred tax assets due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 discussed earlier.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income
 
Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, investmentsinvestment securities and other interest-earning assets and theminus interest expense incurred on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by changes in general market interest rates and by changes in the amounts and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate changes can create fluctuations in net interest income and/or margin due to an imbalance in the timing of repricing or maturity of assets or liabilities. We manage interest rate risk exposure with the goal of minimizingoptimizing the effect of interest rate volatility on net interest income.
 
Net interest margin is expressed as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets and the average rate incurred on total interest-bearing liabilities. Both of these measures are reported on a taxable-equivalent basis. Net interest margin is the higher of the two because it reflects interest income earned on assets funded with non-interest-bearing sources of funds, which include demand deposits and stockholders’ equity.
 
The following tableAverage Statements of Condition and Analysis of Net Interest Income, compares interest income, average interest-earning assets, interest expense, and average interest-bearing liabilities for the periods presented. The table also presents net interest income, net interest margin and net interest rate spread for the years indicated.
Average Statements of Condition and Analysis of Net Interest Income
Year endedYear endedYear ended
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
InterestInterestInterest
AverageIncome/Yield/AverageIncome/Yield/AverageIncome/Yield/
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)BalanceExpenseRateBalanceExpenseRateBalanceExpenseRate
Assets
Interest-earning deposits with banks 1
$120,395 $1,407 1.15 %$287,626 $399 0.14 %$153,794 $461 0.29 %
Investment securities 2, 3
1,796,628 35,534 1.98 %866,790 16,999 1.96 %533,186 15,025 2.82 %
Loans 1, 3, 4
2,175,259 94,614 4.29 %2,155,982 92,376 4.23 %2,023,203 85,398 4.15 %
   Total interest-earning assets 1
4,092,282 131,555 3.17 %3,310,398 109,774 3.27 %2,710,183 100,884 3.66 %
Cash and non-interest-bearing due from banks53,534 61,299 49,676 
Bank premises and equipment, net7,400 5,964 5,526 
Interest receivable and other assets, net151,295 159,502 131,780 
Total assets$4,304,511 $3,537,163 $2,897,165 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing transaction accounts$294,682 $421 0.14 %$217,924 $172 0.08 %$148,817 $186 0.13 %
Savings accounts341,710 125 0.04 %268,397 94 0.04 %184,146 68 0.04 %
Money market accounts1,065,104 1,589 0.15 %864,625 1,520 0.18 %763,689 2,009 0.26 %
Time accounts, including CDARS140,547 323 0.23 %115,393 246 0.21 %96,558 554 0.57 %
Borrowings and other obligations 1, 6
2,295 91 3.90 %892 1.08 %174 2.16 %
Subordinated debenture 1, 5
— — — %534 1,361 251.54 %2,741 158 5.68 %
   Total interest-bearing liabilities1,844,338 2,549 0.14 %1,467,765 3,402 0.23 %1,196,125 2,979 0.25 %
Demand accounts1,993,373 1,628,289 1,308,199 
Interest payable and other liabilities49,456 46,746 41,347 
Stockholders' equity417,344 394,363 351,494 
Total liabilities & stockholders' equity$4,304,511 $3,537,163 $2,897,165 
Tax-equivalent net interest income/margin 1
$129,006 3.11 %$106,372 3.17 %$97,905 3.55 %
Reported net interest income/margin 1
$127,492 3.07 %$104,951 3.13 %$96,659 3.51 %
Tax-equivalent net interest rate spread3.03 %3.04 %3.41 %
1 Interest income/expense is divided by actual number of days in the period times 360 days to correspond to stated interest rate terms, where applicable.
2 Yields on available-for-sale securities are calculated based on amortized cost balances rather than fair value, as changes in fair value are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity. Investment security interest is earned on 30/360 day basis monthly.
3 Yields and interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory rate of 21%.
4 Average balances on loans outstanding include non-performing loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield.
5 2021 interest on the subordinated debenture included $1.3 million in accelerated discount accretion from the early redemption of our last subordinated debenture on March 15, 2021.
6 Average balances and rate consider $13.9 million in FHLB borrowings acquired from AMRB that were redeemed on August 25, 2021.
30


Table 1 Average Statements of Condition and Analysis of Net Interest Income
  Year ended Year ended Year ended
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
   Interest   Interest   Interest 
  AverageIncome/Yield/ AverageIncome/Yield/ AverageIncome/Yield/
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)BalanceExpenseRate BalanceExpenseRate BalanceExpenseRate
Assets           
 
Interest-bearing due from banks 1
$80,351
$995
1.22% $38,314
$209
0.54% $52,004
$135
0.26%
 
Investment securities 2, 3
419,873
9,732
2.32% 406,640
8,671
2.13% 370,730
8,255
2.23%
 
Loans 1, 3, 4
1,511,503
68,562
4.47% 1,452,357
68,794
4.66% 1,354,564
62,953
4.58%
 
   Total interest-earning assets 1
2,011,727
79,289
3.89% 1,897,311
77,674
4.03% 1,777,298
71,343
3.96%
 Cash and non-interest-bearing due from banks42,511
   42,150
   44,543
  
 Bank premises and equipment, net8,411
   8,836
   9,705
  
 Interest receivable and other assets, net63,301
   59,989
   58,201
  
Total assets$2,125,950
   $2,008,286
   $1,889,747
  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity           
 Interest-bearing transaction accounts$105,544
$108
0.10% $94,252
$109
0.12% $95,662
$115
0.12%
 Savings accounts167,190
66
0.04% 151,214
58
0.04% 134,997
50
0.04%
 Money market accounts542,592
555
0.10% 524,989
445
0.08% 505,280
495
0.10%
 Time accounts, including CDARS146,069
576
0.39% 158,878
742
0.47% 156,316
853
0.55%
 
Overnight borrowings 1
1

1.75% 5,383
23
0.42% 784
3
0.38%
 
FHLB fixed-rate advances 1


% 6,803
456
6.59% 15,000
315
2.07%
 
Subordinated debentures 1
5,664
439
7.65% 5,493
436
7.80% 5,288
420
7.94%
    Total interest-bearing liabilities967,060
1,744
0.18% 947,012
2,269
0.24% 913,327
2,251
0.25%
 Demand accounts899,289
   819,916
   753,038
  
 Interest payable and other liabilities13,506
   15,142
   14,856
  
 Stockholders' equity246,095
   226,216
   208,526
  
Total liabilities & stockholders' equity$2,125,950
   $2,008,286
   $1,889,747
  
Tax-equivalent net interest income/margin 1
 $77,545
3.80%  $75,405
3.91%  $69,092
3.83%
Reported net interest income/margin 1
 $74,852
3.67%  $73,161
3.79%  $67,187
3.73%
Tax-equivalent net interest rate spread 
3.71%   3.79%   3.71%
 
1 Interest income/expense is divided by actual number of days in the period times 360 days to correspond to stated interest rate terms, where applicable.
2 Yields on available-for-sale securities are calculated based on amortized cost balances rather than fair value, as changes in fair value are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity. Investment security interest is earned on 30/360 day basis monthly.
3 Yields and interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the Federal statutory rate of 35 percent.
4 Average balances on loans outstanding include non-performing loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield.


Table 2Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income


The following table presents the effects of changes in average balances (volume) or changes in average rates on tax-equivalent net interest income for the years indicated. Volume variances are equal to the increase or decrease in average balances multiplied by prior period rates. Rate variances are equal to the increase or decrease in rates multiplied by prior period average balances. Mix variances are attributable to the change in yields or rates multiplied by the change in average balances.
2022 compared to 20212021 compared to 2020
(in thousands, unaudited)VolumeYield/RateMixTotalVolumeYield/RateMixTotal
Interest-earning deposits with banks$(233)$2,961 $(1,720)$1,008 $401 $(247)$(216)$(62)
Investment securities 1
18,233 146 156 18,535 9,400 (4,568)(2,858)1,974 
Loans 1
826 1,401 11 2,238 5,605 1,526 (153)6,978 
Total interest-earning assets18,826 4,508 (1,553)21,781 15,406 (3,289)(3,227)8,890 
Interest-bearing transaction accounts61 139 49 249 90 (75)(29)(14)
Savings accounts26 — 31 31 (3)(2)26 
Money market accounts352 (229)(54)69 266 (663)(92)(489)
Time accounts, including CDARS54 19 77 108 (348)(68)(308)
Borrowings and other obligations16 25 41 82 16 (2)(9)
Subordinated debenture— (1,361)— (1,361)(127)6,851 (5,521)1,203 
Total interest-bearing liabilities509 (1,402)40 (853)384 5,760 (5,721)423 
Tax-equivalent net interest income$18,317 $5,910 $(1,593)$22,634 $15,022 $(9,049)$2,494 $8,467 
1 Yields and interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory rate of 21%.
 2017 compared to 20162016 compared to 2015
(in thousands, unaudited)Volume
Yield/Rate
Mix
Total
Volume
Yield/Rate
Mix
Total
Interest-bearing due from banks$229
$266
$291
$786
$(36)$149
$(39)$74
Investment securities 1
282
754
25
1,061
800
(350)(34)416
Loans 1
2,802
(2,915)(119)(232)4,545
1,209
87
5,841
Total interest-earning assets3,313
(1,895)197
1,615
5,309
1,008
14
6,331
Interest-bearing transaction accounts13
(13)(1)(1)(2)(4)
(6)
Savings accounts6
2

8
6
2

8
Money market accounts15
91
4
110
19
(67)(3)(51)
Time accounts, including CDARS(60)(115)9
(166)14
(123)(2)(111)
FHLB borrowings and overnight borrowings(479)

(479)(155)690
(374)161
Subordinated debentures14
(10)(1)3
17


17
Total interest-bearing liabilities(491)(45)11
(525)(101)498
(379)18
 $3,804
$(1,850)$186
$2,140
$5,410
$510
$393
$6,313
1 Yields and interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory rate of 35%.


2022 Compared to 2021
2017 Compared with 2016

Net interest income totaled $74.9 million and $73.2$127.5 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase of $1.72022, compared to $105.0 million in 2017 is primarily due to an2021. The $22.5 million increase in earning assets of $114.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in gains on payoffs and accretion on purchased loans, and a $1.4 million interest recovery in 2016. The tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.80% in 2017, compared to 3.91% in 2016.  The decrease of eleven basis pointsfrom the prior year was primarily due to higher balances in the investment and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which added $18.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively, to net interest income. Additionally, 2022 incorporated a full year of net interest income from acquired earning assets of AMRB, compared to five months in 2021. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $376.6 million while the average cost dropped nine basis points, largely due to the extinguishment of subordinated debt that generated $1.4 million of interest recovery upon payoff of a problem creditexpense in 2016. Other factors that affected the net interest margin during 2017 included a decline in gains on payoffs and accretion on purchased loans and a shift in the mix of earning assets. These factors were partially offset by higher average yields on investment securities and cash in 2017, and prepayment fees of $312 thousand on FHLB borrowings in 2016. The net interest spread decreased eight basis points over the same period for the same reasons.2021.

The yield on average interest-earning assets decreased fourteen basis points in 2017 compared to 2016 for the reasons listed above. The loan portfolio as a percentage of average interest-earning assets, decreased to 75.1% in 2017, from 76.6% in 2016. Cash was 4.0% and 2.0% of average interest-earning assets in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total average interest-earning assets increased $114.4 million, or 6.0%, in 2017 compared to 2016.

2016 Compared with 2015

The tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.91%decreased six basis points to 3.11% in 2016, compared2022, from 3.17% in 2021, as the proportion of average investment securities to 3.83%average total interest-earning assets grew from 26% in 2015.2021 to 44% in 2022 and fee income from PPP loans declined.

2021 Compared to 2020

Net interest income totaled $105.0 million and $96.7 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $8.3 million increase of eight basis pointsin 2021 was primarily due to ahigher average loan and investment securities balances. In addition, we recognized $8.3 million in SBA PPP fees, net of cost in 2021, compared to $3.8 million in 2020. These increases were partially offset by $1.4 million in interest recovery upon payoffand accelerated discount accretion on the early redemption of a problem creditsubordinated debenture in 2016. Other factors that affected the first quarter of 2021, and lower yields on investment securities.

The tax-equivalent net interest margin during 2016 included greater gains on payoffs and accretion on purchased loans and a shift to higher yielding earning assets, partially offset by lower average rates on loans and investment securities and prepayment fees of $312 thousand on FHLB borrowings. The net interest spread increased eightdecreased 38 basis points over the same period for the same reasons.

The yield on average interest-earning assets increased seven basis pointsto 3.17% in 2016 compared to 20152021, from 3.55% in 2020 for the reasons listed above. The loan portfolioalready mentioned and as a percentageshown in the above table. The SBA PPP loans improved the 2021 net interest margin by 10 basis points, and the early redemption of average interest-earning assets, increased to 76.6% in 2016, from 76.2% in 2015. The investment securities were 21.4% and 20.9% of average interest-earning assets in 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total average interest-earning assets increased $120.0 million, or 6.8%, in 2016 compared to 2015.the subordinated debenture reduced it by 4 basis points.




Market Interest Rates


Market interest rates are, in part, based on the target federal funds interest rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for short-term borrowings) implemented by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee ("FOMC"). Actions

In response to the evolving risks to economic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the FOMC to increase the targetmade two emergency federal funds rate by 25cuts totaling 150 basis points in December 2015, December 2016, March 2017, June 2017 and December 2017, have positively impacted yields2020. The federal funds rate range remained
31


between 0.0% to 0.25% through the beginning of 2022, putting downward pressure on our rate sensitive interest-earning assets. The increaseasset yields and net interest margin. Beginning in June 2017,March 2022, the FOMC began successive increases to the current target range for the federal funds rate due to the evolving inflation risks, international political unrest and oil and other supply chain disruptions. As a result of 1.25%five rate adjustments during 2022, the federal funds target rate range increased to 1.50%, was4.25% to 4.50% at year-end. Subsequently, on February 1, 2023, the fifthFOMC increased the rate hike since 2008. Ifby another 25 basis points to a range of 4.50% to 4.75%. As shown in the table above, higher interest rates continuecontributed an additional $5.9 million to rise, we anticipate that our net interest income will increase. While short-term interest rates have risen and improved the Bank’s yields on prime-rate adjustable assets, there has been little movement in longer-term rates that influence competitive pricing for fixed-rate lending activities.

Impact of Acquired Loans on Net Interest Margin

Early payoffs or prepayments of our acquired loans with significant unamortized purchase discount/premium could result2022 compared to 2021. Additional rate increases are anticipated in volatility in our net interest margin. Accretions and gains on payoffs of purchased loans are recorded in interest income. The loans acquired from Bank of Napa are not expected to significantly increase the accretion of purchased loans. As our acquired loans from prior acquisitions2023, as Federal Reserve policymakers continue to pay off, we expect accretion income from these loans to continue to decline. The positive affect on our net interest margin during the past three years was as follows:monitor inflation and economic developments. See ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk for further information.

 Years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Dollar AmountBasis point affect on net interest margin Dollar AmountBasis point affect on net interest margin Dollar AmountBasis point affect on net interest margin
Accretion on purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans$331
2 bps $364
2 bps $495
3 bps
Accretion on non-PCI loans$571
3 bps $1,411
7 bps $1,389
8 bps
Gains on payoffs of PCI loans$184
1 bps $1,027
5 bps $44
0 bps

Provision for LoanCredit Losses on Loans
Management assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses quarterly based on several factors including growth of the loan portfolio, analysis of probable losses in the portfolio, historical loss experience and the current economic climate.  Actual losses on loans are charged against the allowance, and the allowance is increased by loss recoveries and provisions for loan losses charged to expense.  For further discussion, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


We recorded a $500net $63 thousand reversal of the provision for loancredit losses on loans in 2017, consistent with our organic loan growth and changing risk factors,2022, compared to a $1.4 million reversal of loanthe provision for credit losses in 2021 and $4.6 million provision for credit losses in 2020.

The net reversal of $1.9 millionthe provision in 20162022 was largely due to a $55.4 million decrease in applicable loan balances (excludes the resolution $107.7 million decrease in PPP loans for which there was no allowance) and payoffimprovements in the Moody's Analytics' Baseline Forecast of a problem commercial real estate credit. The provision for loan losses totaled $500 thousand in 2015. TheCalifornia unemployment rates since December 31, 2021, which decreased the quantitative "modeled" allowance for loan losses was 0.94%, 1.04% and 1.03%credit losses. These decreases were partially offset by adjustments to qualitative risk factors to account for the ongoing deterioration in the economic outlook that management believes is not captured in the quantitative portion of loans at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. the allowance.

The declinenet provision reversal in ratio compared to the prior year2021 was primarily due to loans acquired from Bankcontinued improvements in Moody's Analytics' Baseline Forecast of NapaCalifornia unemployment rates and adjustments to qualitative risk factors due to a decline in November 2017 that were recorded at fair value upon acquisition requiring no allowance as of December 31, 2017. The allowance for loan losses, excluding acquired loans, was 1.06%, 1.10% and 1.12%the volume of loans at December 31, 2017, 2016downgraded to substandard classification, fewer delinquencies, and 2015, respectively. Net charge-offs totaled $175 thousand in 2017, compared to net recoveriesthe elimination of $2.3 million in 2016, primarilyan allowance related to the resolution of the problema commercial real estate credit. Net charge-offs totaled $600 thousandloan that had been individually analyzed for potential credit losses in 2015, primarily relatingthe previous periods and paid off in 2021. These reversals were partially offset by an increase in the allowance for credit losses related to a land development loan soldqualitative risk factor adjustments for recent changes in 2015. Seeexecutive leadership and senior lending positions, and integration of AMRB.

The provision for credit losses in 2020 calculated under the section captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses” below for further analysisincurred loss method (prior to the adoption of the provisionexcepted credit loss method on December 31, 2020) was largely due to the uncertainty about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the local and regional economies and our customers at that time. In addition, under the CECL method, we increased our allowance for loan losses.credit losses by approximately $925 thousand for previously acquired loans (i.e., non-purchased credit deteriorated or "non-PCD" loans); whereas, under previous GAAP (incurred loss method) we did not record an allowance on our unimpaired previously acquired non-PCD loans. The pandemic also negatively affected the financial condition of many of our borrowers, which was partially alleviated by our payment relief program under the 2020 CARES Act and the SBA PPP.




Non-interest Income
 
The table below details the components of non-interest income.
2022 compared to 20212021 compared to 2020
 Years ended December 31,Amount Increase (Decrease)Percent Increase (Decrease)Amount Increase (Decrease)Percent Increase (Decrease)
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)202220212020
Wealth Management and Trust Services$2,227 $2,222 $1,851 $0.2 %$371 20.0 %
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance, net1,229 2,194 973 (965)(44.0)%1,221 125.5 %
Debit card interchange fees, net2,051 1,812 1,438 239 13.2 %374 26.0 %
Service charges on deposit accounts2,007 1,593 1,314 414 26.0 %279 21.2 %
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stock1,056 760 654 296 38.9 %106 16.2 %
Merchant interchange fees, net549 422 239 127 30.1 %183 76.6 %
(Losses) gains on investment securities, net(63)(16)915 (47)293.8 %(931)(101.7)%
Other income1,849 1,145 1,166 704 61.5 %(21)(1.8)%
Total non-interest income$10,905 $10,132 $8,550 $773 7.6 %$1,582 18.5 %

32


Table 3 Components of Non-Interest Income
 Years ended2017 compared to 2016 2016 compared to 2015
 December 31,AmountPercent AmountPercent
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)2017
2016
2015
Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease)
Service charges on deposit accounts$1,784
$1,789
$1,979
$(5)(0.3)% $(190)(9.6)%
Wealth Management and Trust Services2,090
2,090
2,391

 % (301)(12.6)%
Debit card interchange fees1,531
1,503
1,445
28
1.9 % 58
4.0 %
Merchant interchange fees398
449
545
(51)(11.4)% (96)(17.6)%
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance845
844
814
1
0.1 % 30
3.7 %
Dividends on FHLB stock766
1,153
1,003
(387)(33.6)% 150
15.0 %
Gains on investment securities, net(185)425
79
(610)(143.5)% 346
438.0 %
Other income1,039
908
937
131
14.4 % (29)(3.1)%
Total non-interest income$8,268
$9,161
$9,193
$(893)(9.7)% $(32)(0.3)%


2022 Compared to 2021
2017 Compared with 2016


Non-interest income totaled $8.3 million and $9.2$10.9 million in 20172022, a $773 thousand increase from $10.1 million in 2021. The increase was primarily due to higher fees on deposit balances held in off-balance sheet deposit networks contributing $504 thousand in additional income, $414 thousand more service charges on deposit accounts, $296 thousand higher FHLB dividends, and 2016, respectively. The decrease compared toa combination of smaller increases. Increases were partially offset by a $965 thousand reduction in bank-owned life insurance as the prior year primarily relatesincluded $1.1 million in benefits collected on insurance policies. Additionally, 2022 incorporated a full year of non-interest income from the AMRB acquisition, compared to a special FHLB dividend of $347 thousand and $425 thousand net gains on the sale of investment securities recordedfive months in 2016. Additionally, merchant interchange fees continue2021.

2021 Compared to trend down as we transitioned our merchant customers to a new service provider with different contract arrangements in 2016 and 2017.2020

2016 Compared with 2015


Non-interest income totaled $9.2$10.1 million and $8.6 million in both 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Non-interest income in 2016 included higher gains onThe $1.5 million increase was primarily due to the salecollection of investment securities, higher dividends on FHLB stock as we purchased $1.8$1.1 million in capital stock due tobenefits on bank-owned life insurance policies and an increase in the total asset base used to calculate our membership stock requirement, and received a $347 thousand special dividend, compared to a $305 thousand special dividend in 2015. These increases were offset by lower service charges on business analysis accounts dueand interchange fees related to higher averagethe expanded deposit balancesbase. In March 2020, we implemented temporary waivers for all ATM fees, overdraft fees and lower wealth management and trust related feesearly withdrawal penalties for time deposits to help ease the financial burden customers began experiencing due to the settlementpandemic. We reinstituted the fees in May 2021. Additionally, Wealth Management and Trust income increased due to the addition of several large estatesnew accounts and favorable market performance in 2015 and early 2016. Additionally, merchant interchange fees continue to trend down as we transition our merchant customers to a new service provider with different contract arrangements.2021. Increases were partially offset by the $931 thousand reduction in gains on sales of investment securities.




Non-interest Expense


The table below details the components of non-interest expense.
Table 4 Components of Non-Interest Expense
Years ended2017 compared to 20162016 compared to 20152022 compared to 20212021 compared to 2020
December 31,AmountPercentAmountPercent Years ended December 31,Amount Increase (Decrease)Percent Increase (Decrease)Amount Increase (Decrease)Percent Increase (Decrease)
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)2017
2016
2015
Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease)(dollars in thousands; unaudited)202220212020
Salaries and related benefits$29,958
$26,663
$25,764
$3,295
12.4 %$899
3.5 %
Salaries and employee benefitsSalaries and employee benefits$42,046 $41,939 $34,393 $107 0.3 %$7,546 21.9 %
Occupancy and equipment5,472
5,081
5,498
391
7.7 %(417)(7.6)%Occupancy and equipment7,823 7,297 6,943 526 7.2 %354 5.1 %
Depreciation and amortization1,941
1,822
1,968
119
6.5 %(146)(7.4)%
FDIC insurance666
825
997
(159)(19.3)%(172)(17.3)%
Data processing4,906
3,625
3,318
1,281
35.3 %307
9.3 %Data processing4,649 5,139 3,184 (490)(9.5)%1,955 61.4 %
Professional services2,858
2,044
2,121
814
39.8 %(77)(3.6)%Professional services3,299 4,974 2,181 (1,675)(33.7)%2,793 128.1 %
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization1,840 1,740 2,149 100 5.7 %(409)(19.0)%
Information technologyInformation technology2,197 1,550 1,050 647 41.7 %500 47.6 %
Amortization of core deposit intangibleAmortization of core deposit intangible1,489 1,135 853 354 31.2 %282 33.1 %
Directors' expense720
553
826
167
30.2 %(273)(33.1)%Directors' expense1,107 957 713 150 15.7 %244 34.2 %
Information technology769
862
736
(93)(10.8)%126
17.1 %
Provision for (reversal of) losses on off-balance sheet commitments57
150
(263)(93)(62.0)%413
(157.0)%
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insuranceFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance1,179 889 474 290 32.6 %415 87.6 %
Charitable contributionsCharitable contributions709 587 1,034 122 20.8 %(447)(43.2)%
Other real estate ownedOther real estate owned359 — 354 7,080.0 %N/A
Other non-interest expense:    Other non-interest expense:
Advertising567
565
334
2
0.4 %231
69.2 %Advertising1,070 908 769 162 17.8 %139 18.1 %
Amortization of core deposit intangible528
533
619
(5)(0.9)%(86)(13.9)%
Other expense5,340
4,969
5,031
371
7.5 %(62)(1.2)%Other expense7,502 5,518 4,715 1,984 36.0 %803 17.0 %
Total other non-interest expense6,435
6,067
5,984
368
6.1 %83
1.4 %Total other non-interest expense8,572 6,426 5,484 2,146 33.4 %942 17.2 %
Total non-interest expense$53,782
$47,692
$46,949
$6,090
12.8 %$743
1.6 %Total non-interest expense$75,269 $72,638 $58,458 $2,631 3.6 %$14,180 24.3 %


20172022 Compared with 2016to 2021


In 2017, non-interestNon-interest expense increased by $6.1$2.6 million to $53.8 million. The$75.3 million in 2022 from $72.6 million in 2021. Information technology expenses increased $647 thousand due to investments in software and equipment during 2022. Total occupancy expenses, including depreciation and amortization, increased $626 thousand resulting primarily from merger growth and $212 thousand in accelerated costs related to planned branch closures. Other increases in 2022 included core deposit intangible amortization and FDIC insurance, largely attributable to the 2021 AMRB acquisition, a $345 thousand valuation adjustment in other real estate owned expense, and a $490 thousand increase in employment recruiting costs included in other expense.

33


Salaries and employee benefits expense was relatively flat year-over-year. In 2022, increases in staffing and profit sharing expenses, a reduction in deferred loan origination costs, and a combination of smaller items were largely offset by a decrease in supplemental executive retirement plan expense from an adjustment to the discount rate, and a decline in merger-related expenses, as shown in the table on page 28.

Professional services decreased $1.7 million from the prior year, primarily relatesdue to higher salariesmerger-related costs and benefits due to additional full-time equivalent personnel, annual merit increases, and higher employee insurance. The number of average FTE employees totaled 269consulting expenses associated with PPP loan forgiveness application processing in 2017 and 258 in 2016. The increase also relates to $2.2 million in acquisition expenses ($1.1 million in data processing, $952 thousand in professional services, $35 thousand in personnel severance and $114 thousand in other expense), as well as higher occupancy and equipment expenses related to rent increases, new branches and higher maintenance costs.

These increases were2021, partially offset by lower FDIC assessmentshigher audit and accounting fees in 2022. Data processing expenses decreased by $490 thousand primarily due to lower assessment rates. For additional informationmerger-related expenses in 2021, as shown in the table on the acquisition related expenses, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.

2016 Compared with 2015

In 2016, non-interest expense increased by $743 thousand to $47.7 million. The increase primarily relates to higher salaries and benefits due to annual merit increases, higher employee insurance and stock-based compensation expense,page 28, partially offset by an increase in processing costs in 2022 associated with higher volumes for the effectlarger bank.

2021 Compared to 2020

Non-interest expense increased $14.1 million to $72.6 million in 2021 from $58.5 million in 2020. The largest increase of job vacancies during the year. The number$6.5 million came from merger-related and conversion costs. In addition to $3.0 million in merger costs, salaries and related benefits rose another $4.5 million due to increased numbers of average FTE employees, totaled 258regularly scheduled annual merit and related increases, and lower deferred loan origination costs. Professional services included $817 thousand more in 2016consulting expenses for PPP loan forgiveness application processing, investment advisory services, and 260 in 2015. The increase also relates to a higher reserve for losses on off-balance sheet commitments, as unused commitments increased in 2016, and 2015 included a one-time adjustment (reversal) related to a refinement in methodology (see discussion below).legal costs. Data processing costs alsoincreased by an additional $828 thousand primarily due to increases core processing and mobile banking systems charges, and other categories increased due to higher transaction volume and the additionlarger size of new products and services.

These increases were partially offsetthe bank. FDIC insurance increased by a decrease$415 thousand due to an increase in occupancy and equipment expenses from cost savingsour deposit base. Charitable contributions decreased due to supplemental contributions in 2020 related to the relocation of offices in 2016 and lease accounting adjustments recorded in 2015, lower director expense resulting from fewer board members, as well as lower FDIC assessment expense due to lower assessment rates.pandemic.




Provision for Income Taxes


The provision for income taxes totaled $12.9 million at an effective tax rate of 44.6% in 2017, compared to $13.3 million at an effective tax rate of 36.6% in 2016 and $10.5 million at an effective tax rate of 36.3% in 2015. The 2017 provision for income taxes included a $3.0 million write-down of net deferred tax assets related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on December 22, 2017, which reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% at which the temporary difference of tax items are expected to reverse in the future. The deferred tax write-down in 2017 raised the effective tax rate by 10.5%. We incurred non-deductible acquisition related expenses in 2017, which also increased our effective tax rate by 0.8% compared to the prior year. Additionally, discrete tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock increased in 2017 as a result of the adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASU") No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"), as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report. Income tax provisions reflect accruals for taxes at the applicable rates for federal income tax and California franchise tax based upon reported pre-tax income, and adjusted for the effects of allincome. Provisions also reflect permanent differences between income for tax and financial reporting purposes (such as earnings on tax exempt loans and municipal securities, bank owned life insurance ("BOLI")BOLI, low-income housing tax credits, and lowstock-based compensation from the exercise of stock options, disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards).

The provision for income housing credits). Additional fluctuationstaxes totaled $16.9 million at an effective tax rate of 26.6% in 2022, compared to $11.7 million at an effective tax rate of 26.0% in 2021 and $10.3 million at an effective tax rate of 25.5% in 2020. The increase in the provision in 2022 compared to 2021 reflected higher pre-tax income. The 60 basis point increase in the effective tax rate from periodin 2022 as compared to period are2021 was primarily due to lower BOLI income and the relationshipsmaller proportion of net permanent differencestax-exempt loan and investment securities interest income to pre-tax income before tax.in 2022, partially offset by the non-deductible merger expenses and executive compensation in 2021. The 50 basis point increase in the effective tax rate in 2021 compared to 2020 was due to non-deductible merger expenses and executive compensation, partially offset by higher BOLI income and tax-exempt loan and investment securities interest income.


We file a consolidated return in the U.S. Federal tax jurisdiction and a combined return in the State of California tax jurisdiction. There were no ongoing federal or state income tax examinations at the issuance of this report. In June 2015, the State of California completed its examination of the 2011 and 2012 corporate income tax returns, resulting in a minor adjustment. At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, neither the Bank nor Bancorp had accruals for interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.


The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 includes numerous uncertainties, which will likely require the issuance of new regulations or other interpretive guidance for clarification. Although we believe our assumptions, judgments and estimates are reasonable, changes in tax laws and their interpretation could significantly affect the amounts provided for income taxes in our consolidated financial statements. We estimate that the reduction in the federal statutory tax rate for corporations like us effective January 1, 2018 from 35% to 21% will reduce our effective tax rate for 2018 to approximately 24%. However, there can be no assurance as to the actual amount because the provision for income taxes is dependent upon the nature and amount of future income and expenses as well as transactions with discrete tax effects such as the exercise of stock options. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 has provisions that will have an unfavorable impact to our tax expenses, including but not limited to 1) elimination or reductions to the deductibility of certain meals, entertainment, parking and transportation expenses, 2) elimination of the exception for performance-based executive compensation resulting in our inability to deduct executive compensation exceeding $1.0 million, and 3) clarification of the definition of a covered employee for excessive employee compensation purposes.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our assets increased $445 million from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Increases of $376 million in deposits and $192 million in loans reflected both organic growth and the acquisition of Bank of Napa. The influx of deposits also raised our cash level by $155 million.


Investment Securities


We maintain an investment securities portfolio to provide liquidity and to generate earnings on funds that have not been loaned to customers. Management determines the maturities and types of securities to be purchased based on liquidity theand interest rate risk position, and the desire to attain a reasonable investment yield balanced with risk exposure. Table 5 showsThe tables below show the composition of the debt securities portfolio by expected maturity at December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. We estimate and update expected maturity dates regularly based on current and historical prepayment speeds. The weighted
34


average life of the investment portfolio at December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 was approximately five yearsseven and foursix years, respectively.

December 31, 2022Within 1 Year1-5 Years5-10 YearsAfter 10 YearsTotal
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
Amortized Cost1
Fair Value
Average Yield2
Held-to-maturity:
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies$463 0.63 %$152,817 3.36 %$419,822 2.20 %$158,410 2.28 %$731,512 $643,437 2.46 %
SBA-backed securities— — 2,372 3.17 — — — — 2,372 2,239 3.17 
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies— — 24,993 4.26 47,017 2.06 73,813 1.91 145,823 119,356 2.36 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
— — — — 5,515 3.72 26,600 2.74 32,115 28,846 2.90 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - taxable— — — — 4,708 1.84 25,677 2.28 30,385 22,913 2.21 
Corporate bonds— — 30,000 3.63 — — — — 30,000 28,448 3.63 
Total held-to-maturity463 0.63 210,182 3.50 477,062 2.20 284,500 2.22 972,207 845,239 2.49 
Available-for-sale:
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies2,305 2.02 317,528 2.13 198,809 2.43 9,823 2.55 528,465 475,505 2.25 
SBA-backed securities65 1.01 47,166 2.66 — — 493 5.03 47,724 44,355 2.68 
Debentures of government sponsored agencies— — 140,145 1.29 6,977 1.35 1,992 1.39 149,114 135,106 1.29 
U.S. Treasury securities— — — — 11,904 1.00 — — 11,904 10,269 1.00 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
— — 9,711 2.09 11,721 2.86 81,922 2.67 103,354 91,138 2.64 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - taxable200 3.16 1,808 1.65 10,475 1.67 1,018 1.98 13,501 10,985 1.71 
Corporate bonds— — 31,000 1.03 5,990 1.23 — — 36,990 33,276 1.05 
Asset-backed securities— — — — 1,553 5.04 — — 1,553 1,462 5.04 
Total available-for-sale2,570 2.09 547,358 1.89 247,429 2.30 95,248 2.64 892,605 802,096 2.09 
Total$3,033 1.87 %$757,540 2.34 %$724,491 2.24 %$379,748 2.33 %$1,864,812 $1,647,335 2.30 %

35


Table 5 Investment Securities

December 31, 2021December 31, 2021Within 1 Year1-5 Years5-10 YearsAfter 10 YearsTotal
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)(dollars in thousands; unaudited)
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
AmortizedCost1
Average Yield2
Amortized Cost1
Fair Value
Average Yield2
Held-to-maturity:Held-to-maturity:
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agenciesMBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies$1,550 1.05 %$99,062 2.03 %$116,665 1.79 %$21,430 1.97 %$238,707 $239,856 1.90 %
SBA-backed securitiesSBA-backed securities— — 4,840 3.17 — — — — 4,840 5,038 3.17 
Debentures of government-sponsored agenciesDebentures of government-sponsored agencies— — — — 19,973 1.67 31,499 1.89 51,472 50,571 1.80 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
— — — — 16,686 1.92 — — 16,686 16,794 1.92 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - taxableObligations of state and political subdivisions - taxable101 4.58 — — 25,327 2.17 5,089 2.39 30,517 30,496 2.22 
Total held-to-maturityTotal held-to-maturity1,651 1.27 103,902 2.08 178,651 1.84 58,018 1.96 342,222 342,755 1.93 
December 31, 2017Within 1 Year 1-5 Years 5-10 Years After 10 Years Total
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Fair Value
Average Yield2

Held-to-maturity:              
State and municipal3
$7,606
4.64% $11,293
4.02% $747
5.18% $
% $19,646
$19,998
4.31%
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies

 26,245
2.18
 101,291
2.26
 3,850
2.64
 131,386
131,034
2.26
Total held-to-maturity7,606
4.64
 37,538
2.74
 102,038
2.28
 3,850
2.64
 151,032
151,032
2.52
              
Available-for-sale:              Available-for-sale:
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies800
1.81
 118,125
2.19
 45,739
2.54
 24,702
2.75
 189,366
188,061
2.34
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies13,262 1.24 202,848 1.67 459,936 1.79 87,623 1.26 763,669 759,576 1.69 
SBA backed securities167
5.23
 1,759
2.12
 22,554
2.57
 1,499
3.09
 25,979
25,982
2.59
State and municipal3
7,192
1.84
 51,832
2.09
 36,984
2.39
 2,019
4.53
 98,027
97,491
2.24
SBA-backed securitiesSBA-backed securities2.21 30,502 2.45 2,131 0.16 — — 32,640 33,478 2.30 
Debentures of government sponsored agencies1,495
1.55
 11,445
2.06
 

 

 12,940
12,938
2.00
Debentures of government sponsored agencies6,000 2.62 120,115 1.11 16,411 1.39 48,923 1.88 191,449 188,527 1.38 
Privately issued CMOs121
3.35
 1,311
2.53
 

 

 1,432
1,431
2.60
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities— — — — 11,886 1.00 — — 11,886 11,630 1.00 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - tax-exempt3
1,322 3.73 21,026 2.69 92,375 2.60 — — 114,723 119,970 2.63 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions - taxableObligations of state and political subdivisions - taxable1,128 2.86 1,011 3.24 12,147 1.56 — — 14,286 14,030 1.78 
Corporate bonds4,531
1.94
 2,010
2.88
 

 

 6,541
6,564
2.23
Corporate bonds2,013 2.73 31,000 1.03 5,988 1.23 — — 39,001 38,495 1.15 
Asset-backed securitiesAsset-backed securities— — — — 1,866 0.72 — — 1,866 1,862 0.72 
Total available-for-sale14,306
1.89
 186,482
2.16
 105,277
2.50
 28,220
2.90
 334,285
332,467
2.32
Total available-for-sale23,732 1.93 406,502 1.57 602,740 1.87 136,546 1.48 1,169,520 1,167,568 1.72 
Total$21,912
2.84% $224,020
2.26% $207,315
2.39% $32,070
2.87% $485,317
$483,499
2.38%Total$25,383 1.89 %$510,404 1.68 %$781,391 1.86 %$194,564 1.62 %$1,511,742 $1,510,323 1.77 %
              
December 31, 2016Within 1 Year 1-5 Years 5-10 Years After 10 Years Total
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Average Yield2

 
AmortizedCost1

Fair Value
Average Yield2

Held-to-maturity:              
State and municipal3
$9,954
3.18% $18,925
5.33% $1,977
6.85% $
% $30,856
$31,544
4.73%
Corporate bonds3,519
1.07
 

 

 

 3,519
3,518
1.07
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies

 4,051
3.50
 6,012
3.32
 

 10,063
10,035
3.39
Total held-to-maturity13,473
2.63
 22,976
5.01
 7,989
4.19
 

 44,438
45,097
4.14
              
Available-for-sale:             
MBS/CMOs issued by U.S. government agencies11,609
1.65
 142,602
2.03
 103,260
1.92
 

 257,471
253,434
1.97
SBA backed securities

 614
5.21
 

 

 614
607
5.21
State and municipal3
4,027
1.93
 31,929
2.35
 41,980
3.07
 1,369
5.46
 79,305
77,701
2.76
Debentures of government sponsored agencies5,000
1.00
 30,486
1.13
 

 

 35,486
35,403
1.11
Privately issued CMOs265
1.62
 154
3.01
 

 

 419
419
2.13
Corporate bonds

 3,965
1.97
 994
1.99
 

 4,959
5,016
1.97
Total available-for-sale20,901
1.55
 209,750
1.96
 146,234
2.25
 1,369
5.46
 378,254
372,580
2.06
Total$34,374
1.97% $232,726
2.26% $154,223
2.35% $1,369
5.46% $422,692
$417,677
2.28%
1 Book value reflects cost, adjusted for accumulated amortization and accretion.
2 Weighted average calculation is based on amortized cost of securities.
3 Yields on tax-exempt municipal bonds are presented on a taxable equivalent basis, using federal tax rate of 21% for 2017 data and 35% for.
2016 data.

The amortized cost of our investment securities portfolio increased $62.6 million$353.1 thousand or 14.8%23.4% during 2017.2022. We purchased $123.2$243.5 million in securities in 2017, including $4.5 million designated as held-to-maturity and $118.7 million2022 designated as available-for-sale to provide flexibility for liquidity and interest rate risk management. In addition, we acquired $75.5We also purchased $319.9 million of investmentin securities from the Bank of Napa acquisition.in 2022 designated as held-to-maturity. These purchases were partially offset by $74.9$177.3 million of paydowns, calls and maturities, and $56$10.7 million of sales during 2017. Sales2022. The weighted average yield on the purchases of securities were mainly duewas 3.22% for the 2022 year and 6.08% for the fourth quarter of 2022. We transferred $357.5 million of available-for-sale securities to changesheld-to-maturity in credit and tax law implications.March 2022. Refer to Note 2, Investment Securities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report for further information.


During 2017,2022, we purchased $10$364.6 million in agency debentures issued by FHLMC, $4.5 million in mortgage pass-through securities, $88 million in collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), and $20.7$60.9 million in Small Business Administration backedagency mortgage-backed securities ("SBAs"MBSs")., $61.2 million in debentures of government sponsored agencies, $30.0 million in corporate bonds, $29.9 million in SBA-backed securities and $16.8 million in obligations of state and political subdivisions. We consider agency debentures mortgage-backed securities, and CMOs issued by U.S. government sponsored entities to have low credit risk as they carry the credit support of the U.S. federal government. The debentures, CMOs and MBS issued by the U.S. government sponsored agencies, stateSBA-backed securities and municipal


U.S. Treasury securities SBAs and corporate bonds, made up 68.8%, 24.2%, 5.4% and 1.4%86.7% of the portfolio at December 31, 2017,2022, compared to 71.7%, 26.1%, 0.2% and 2.0%, respectively85.6% at December 31, 2016.2021. See the discussion in the section captioned “Securities May Lose Value due to Credit Quality of the Issuers” in ITEM 1A Risk Factors above.


36


At December 31, 2017,2022 and 2021, distribution of our investment in obligations of state and political subdivisions was as follows:
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Amortized CostFair ValuePercent of
State and Municipal Securities
Amortized CostFair ValuePercent of
State and Municipal Securities
Within California:
General obligation bonds$25,806 $20,768 14.4 %$25,036 $25,020 14.2 %
Revenue bonds3,719 2,987 2.1 5,249 5,185 3.0 
Tax allocation bonds— — — 503 510 0.3 
Total within California29,525 23,755 16.5 30,788 30,715 17.5 
Outside California:
General obligation bonds121,908 106,375 68.0 117,278 121,303 66.5 
Revenue bonds27,922 23,752 15.5 28,146 29,272 16.0 
Total outside California149,830 130,127 83.5 145,424 150,575 82.5 
Total obligations of state and political subdivisions$179,355 $153,882 100.0 %$176,212 $181,290 100.0 %
Percent of investment portfolio9.6%9.3%11.7%12.0%
 December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Amortized Cost
Fair Value
% of
state and municipal securities

Amortized Cost
Fair Value
% of
state and municipal securities

Within California:      
General obligation bonds$19,634
$19,678
16.7%$15,777
$15,660
14.3%
Revenue bonds11,660
11,776
9.9
10,895
11,127
9.9
Tax allocation bonds6,099
6,234
5.2
4,043
4,178
3.7
Total within California37,393
37,688
31.8
30,715
30,965
27.9
Outside California:      
General obligation bonds68,890
68,454
58.5
71,534
70,376
64.9
Revenue bonds11,390
11,346
9.7
7,913
7,904
7.2
Total outside California80,280
79,800
68.2
79,447
78,280
72.1
Total obligations of state and political subdivisions$117,673
$117,488
100.0%$110,162
$109,245
100.0%


The portion of the portfolio outside the state of California is distributed among 28twelve states. TheOf the total investment in obligations of state and political subdivisions, the largest concentrations outside California are in Washington (12.1%Texas (39.6%), Texas (11.4%Washington (14.4%), and Minnesota (7.7%Wisconsin (8.9%). Revenue bonds, both within and outside California, primarily consisted of bonds relating toOur investment in obligations issued by municipal issuers in Texas are either guaranteed by the AAA-rated Texas Permanent School Fund ("PSF") or backed by revenue sources from essential services (such as transportation, infrastructure, public services, educationutilities and utilities)transportation).


Investments in states, municipalities and political subdivisions are subject to an initial pre-purchase credit assessment and ongoing monitoring. Key considerations include:

The soundness of a municipality’s budgetary position and stability of its tax revenues
Debt profile and level of unfunded liabilities, diversity of revenue sources, taxing authority of the issuer
Local demographics/economics including unemployment data, largest local taxpayers and employers, income indices and home values
For revenue bonds, the source and strength of revenue for municipal authorities including obligors' financial condition and reserve levels, annual debt service and debt coverage ratio, and credit enhancement (such as insurer’s strength)
Credit ratings by major credit rating agencies.agencies




Loans


Table 6 Loans Outstanding by Type atClass and Percent of Total
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in thousands; unaudited)Amortized CostPercent of TotalAmortized CostPercent of Total
Commercial and industrial$173,547 8.3 %$301,602 13.4 %
Real estate
  Commercial owner-occupied354,877 17.0 392,345 17.4 
  Commercial investor-owned1,191,889 56.9 1,189,021 52.7 
  Construction114,373 5.5 119,840 5.3 
  Home equity88,748 4.2 88,746 3.9 
  Other residential112,123 5.4 114,558 5.1 
Installment and other consumer56,989 2.7 49,533 2.2 
Total loans, at amortized cost2,092,546 100.0 %2,255,645 100.0 %
Allowance for credit losses on loans(22,983)(23,023)
Total loans, net of allowance for credit losses$2,069,563 $2,232,622 

37


Loans decreased by $163.1 million in 2022, or 7%, to $2.093 billion as of December 31,
(in thousands; unaudited)2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Commercial loans$235,835
$218,615
$219,452
$210,223
$183,291
Real estate     
  Commercial owner-occupied300,963
247,713
242,309
230,605
241,113
  Commercial investor822,984
724,228
715,879
673,499
625,019
  Construction63,828
74,809
65,495
48,413
31,577
  Home equity132,467
117,207
112,300
110,788
98,469
  Other residential 1
95,526
78,549
73,134
73,035
72,634
Installment and other consumer loans27,410
25,495
22,639
16,788
17,219
Total loans1,679,013
1,486,616
1,451,208
1,363,351
1,269,322
Allowance for loan losses(15,767)(15,442)(14,999)(15,099)(14,224)
Total net loans$1,663,246
$1,471,174
$1,436,209
$1,348,252
$1,255,098
1 Our residential loan portfolio includes no sub-prime loans, nor is it our normal practice to underwrite loans commonly referred to as "Alt-A mortgages", the characteristics of which are loans lacking full documentation, borrowers having low FICO scores or collateral compositions reflecting high loan-to-value ratios. Substantially all of our residential loans are indexed to Treasury Constant Maturity Rates and have provisions to reset five years after their origination dates.
We continued 2022, from $2.256 billion as of December 31, 2021. Year-over-year changes were largely attributable to strengthen market presence throughout our footprinta $107.7 million decrease in 2017, including the acquisition of Bank of Napa, which added $134.7 million to our loan portfolioPPP loans and a decrease in November 2017. New organic loan volume totaled approximately $173.1investor-owned commercial real estate loans, partially offset by growth in owner-occupied commercial real estate loans. Loan originations were $240.2 million in 2017,2022 compared to approximately $191.8$181.7 million in 2016. Approximately 87%2021, an increase of 32%. Non-PPP payoffs were $258.5 million in 2022, compared to $218.1 million in 2021. Much of the payoffs in 2022 were outside the Bank's control and 85%resulted from activities such as sales of our outstandingbusinesses and properties, cash repayments, and project completions. The originations and payoffs noted above, combined with utilization on lines of credit and amortization on existing loans, resulted in the net decreases for these periods.

Non-PPP payoffs as a percentage of beginning of the year loan balances were 11.5% in 2022 and 10.4% in 2021. Approximately 90% and 86%, of total loans were secured by real estate at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Also, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, regarding our loan concentration risk.

At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 2.0% of our total loans contained an interest-only feature as part of the loan terms. All of these loans were current with their payments as of December 31, 2017. Except for two2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in the percentage secured by real estate from 2021 to 2022 was primarily due to a $107.7 million reduction in unsecured loans to one borrowing relationship totaling $7.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, all were considered to have low credit risk (graded "Pass").

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $40.8 million and $48.7 million, respectively, of our loans had interest reserves, all of which were construction loans. When we determine a loan is impaired before the depletion of the interest reserve, we apply the interest fundedguaranteed by the interest reserve againstSBA under the PPP, which are included in commercial and industrial loans. For additional information on loan principal. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, no loans having interest reserve balances were determined to be impaired.concentration risk, see ITEM 1A, Risk Factors.


The following table summarizes our commercial real estate loan portfolioconcentrations by the geographic locationcounty in which the property iswas located as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


Table 7 Commercial Real Estate Loans Outstanding by Geographic LocationCounty
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
CountyAmountPercent of Commercial Real Estate LoansAmountPercent of Commercial Real Estate Loans
Marin$339,805 22.0 %$349,445 22.1 %
Sonoma245,883 15.9 230,740 14.6 
Napa186,477 12.1 188,643 11.9 
San Francisco173,511 11.2 172,120 10.9 
Alameda163,381 10.6 176,871 11.2 
Sacramento120,146 7.8 113,120 7.2 
Contra Costa67,356 4.4 69,656 4.4 
San Mateo37,681 2.4 28,119 1.8 
Solano32,235 2.1 40,837 2.6 
Placer28,928 1.9 28,477 1.8 
Santa Clara21,091 1.4 20,070 1.3 
San Joaquin15,585 1.0 8,829 0.6 
El Dorado12,822 0.8 14,708 0.9 
Other101,865 6.4 139,731 8.7 
Total$1,546,766 100.0 %$1,581,366 100.0 %
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Amount% of Commercial real estate loans Amount% of Commercial real estate loans
Marin$341,827
30.4% $310,286
31.9%
Sonoma167,014
14.9
 155,066
16.0
Napa151,778
13.5
 79,872
8.2
San Francisco150,376
13.4
 143,975
14.8
Alameda143,939
12.8
 121,467
12.5
Contra Costa42,093
3.7
 41,808
4.3
San Mateo20,481
1.8
 22,360
2.3
Solano18,071
1.6
 10,606
1.1
El Dorado13,860
1.2
 14,146
1.5
Sacramento11,030
1.0
 11,083
1.1
Other63,478
5.7
 61,272
6.3
Total$1,123,947
100.0% $971,941
100.0%




Commercial real estate loans increased by $152.0decreased $34.6 million in 2017 and $13.82022, compared to a $315.2 million in 2016. The increase in 2017 included $92.3 million from2021. The decrease in 2022 was primarily due to cash paydowns as part of ongoing deleveraging, refinancings and asset sales. The increase in 2021 was primarily due to the Bank of NapaAMRB acquisition as well as lending activitiesand expanded footprint in Marin and Alameda Counties.Northern California. Of the commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2017, 73%2022, 77% were non-owner occupiedinvestor-owned and 27%23% were owner occupied.owner-occupied. Almost the entire commercial real estate loan portfolio is comprised of term loans for which the primary source of repayment is either the operating cash flow from the leasing activities of the real estate collateral. Originated loans are subject to our conservative credit underwriting standards and bothcollateral or the acquired and originated loans are actively managed.operating cash flow of the owner occupant.



38


The following table shows an analysis of construction loans by type and locationcounty as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


Table 8 Construction Loans Outstanding by Type and Geographic LocationCounty
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Loan TypeAmountPercent of Construction LoansAmountPercent of Construction Loans
Apartments and multifamily$60,347 52.7 %$45,978 38.4 %
Commercial real estate33,746 29.5 49,131 41.0 
1-4 Single family residential19,171 16.8 19,564 16.3 
Land - unimproved1,109 1.0 1,201 1.0 
Land - improved— — 3,966 3.3 
Total$114,373 100.0 %$119,840 100.0 %
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Construction loans by typeAmount
% of Construction Loans
 Amount
% of Construction Loans
1-4 Single family residential$22,780
35.7% $41,106
55.0%
Commercial real estate20,935
32.8
 19,861
26.6
Apartments and multifamily14,878
23.3
 9,088
12.1
Land - improved3,668
5.7
 3,245
4.3
Land - unimproved1,567
2.5
 1,509
2.0
Total$63,828
100.0% $74,809
100.0%
      
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Construction loans by geographic locationAmount
% of Construction Loans
 Amount
% of Construction Loans
San Francisco$21,664
33.9% $31,256
41.8%
Napa12,072
18.9
 3,363
4.5
Marin9,750
15.3
 19,354
25.9
Alameda7,783
12.2
 14,905
19.9
Sonoma4,683
7.3
 2,609
3.5
San Mateo3,495
5.5
 

Riverside2,969
4.7
 3,224
4.3
Other1,412
2.2
 98
0.1
Total$63,828
100.0% $74,809
100.0%


(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
CountyAmountPercent of Construction LoansAmountPercent of Construction Loans
San Francisco$45,271 39.6 %$55,826 46.6 %
Alameda20,163 17.6 12,908 10.8 
Solano18,873 16.5 16,367 13.7 
Sonoma17,843 15.6 13,640 11.4 
Marin7,784 6.8 6,074 5.1 
Other4,439 3.9 15,025 12.4 
Total$114,373 100.0 %$119,840 100.0 %
Construction
Construction loans decreased by $11.0$5.5 million in 2017 and increased by $9.32022, compared to an increase of $46.8 million in 2016.2021. The decrease in 20172022 was primarily due to payoffs from completed construction projects, partially offset by $3.2$46.6 million in constructions loans from the Bank of Napa acquisition. The increasepayoffs and $3.6 million in 2016 was dueconversions to draws on both new and existing single-family development construction projects as well as on mixed-use commercial and owner-occupied construction projects. The increases in construction fundingsreal estate financing. These decreases were partially offset by payoffs related$37.5 million advanced on existing construction loans and $7.2 million in new financing. The increase in 2021 was primarily due to completed$48.8 million advanced on existing construction projects. The improving economy resultedloans, $13.2 million in a number of new financing opportunities for existing customers who had successfully completed construction projectsloans assumed in the past.AMRB acquisition and $7.2 million in new financing. These increases were partially offset by $19.5 million in payoffs and $2.9 million in conversions to commercial real estate financing. Undisbursed construction loan commitments at December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $43.2 million and $77.8 million, respectively.


The following table presents the amortized costs and maturity distribution of our commercial and construction loans by class as of December 31, 20172022 based on their contractual maturity dates and doesdates. Maturities do not include scheduled payments or potential prepayments.


Table 9A Commercial and Construction Loan Maturity Distribution
Due within 1 yearDue after 1 through 5 yearsDue after 5 through 15 yearsDue after 15 yearsTotal
(in thousands; unaudited)
Commercial and industrial 1
$61,181 $76,586 $32,530 $3,250 $173,547 
Real estate
Commercial owner-occupied12,869 80,861 253,863 7,284 354,877 
Commercial investor-owned42,643 329,876 792,173 27,197 1,191,889 
Construction 2
47,335 17,027 50,011 — 114,373 
Home equity2,118 23,433 61,618 1,579 88,748 
Other residential1,936 79 1,813 108,295 112,123 
Installment and other consumer loans956 7,389 48,452 192 56,989 
Total$169,038 $535,251 $1,240,460 $147,797 $2,092,546 
1 Commercial and industrial due within 1 year includes SBA PPP loans totaling $3.5 million (net of $99 thousand in unrecognized fees and costs), which are expected to be forgiven by the SBA in 2023.
2 Construction loans that mature after 5 years are structured to convert to permanent financing after the initial construction period.

39

 Due within
Due after 1 but
Due after
 
(in thousands; unaudited)1 year
within 5 years
5 years
Total
Maturity distribution:   

    Commercial$93,686
$80,554
$61,595
$235,835
    Construction46,892
15,916
1,020
63,828
Total$140,578
$96,470
$62,615
$299,663




The following table shows the mix of variable-rate loans to fixed-rate loans for commercial and construction loans.due after one year by class as of December 31, 2022. The large majority of the variable-rate loans are tied to independent indices (such as the Wall Street Journal prime ratePrime Rate or a Treasury Constant Maturity Rate). Most loans with original terms of more than five years have provisions for the fixed rates to reset, or convert to variable rates, after one, three, five or fiveseven years. These loans are included in variable rate balances.variable-rate balances below.


Table 9B Commercial and Construction Loan Interest Rate Sensitivity - Due After One Year
(in thousands; unaudited)FixedVariableTotal
Commercial and industrial$73,688 $38,678 $112,366 
Real estate
Commercial owner-occupied195,342 146,666 342,008 
Commercial investor-owned724,647 424,599 1,149,246 
Construction46,070 20,968 67,038 
Home equity723 85,907 86,630 
Other residential1,738 108,449 110,187 
Installment and other consumer loans41,097 14,936 56,033 
Total$1,083,305 $840,203 $1,923,508 
(in thousands; unaudited)Fixed
Variable
Total
Commercial$111,978
$123,857
$235,835
Construction2,457
61,371
63,828
Total$114,435
$185,228
$299,663



Allowance for LoanCredit Losses on Loans


Credit risk is inherent in the business of lending. As a result, we maintain anThe allowance for loancredit losses on loans is calculated in accordance with ASC 326 based on management's best estimate of current expected credit losses over the loans' contractual terms, adjusted for estimated prepayments where applicable. The contractual terms exclude anticipated extensions, renewals and modifications, except for reasonably expected extensions of certain troubled debt restructure loans. Relevant available information includes historical credit loss experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. While historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, adjustments to absorb probable losseshistorical loss information may be made for differences in our loan portfolio through a provision for loan losses charged against earnings.current portfolio-specific risk characteristics, environmental conditions or other relevant factors. All specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are charged off against the allowance. The balance of our allowance for loan losses is Management's best estimate of the remaining probable losses in the portfolio. The ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upondepends on a variety of complex factors, some of which may be beyond ourmanagement's control, includingsuch as volatility in the real estate market, changes in interest rates and economic and political environments. Based on the current conditions of the loan portfolio Managementand reasonable and supportable forecasts, management believes that the $15.8$23.0 million allowance for loancredit losses at December 31, 2017 is2022 was adequate to absorb expected credit losses in our loan portfolio. However, we can provide no assurance that adverse economic conditions or other circumstances will not resultFor additional information on our allowance for credit losses methodology, refer to Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in increasedITEM 8 of this report.

The allowance for credit losses to loans was 1.10% at December 31, 2022 and 1.02% at December 31, 2021. The allowance for credit losses to loans, excluding SBA PPP loans was 1.10% and 1.07% at year-end 2022 and 2021, respectively (for a discussion of this non-GAAP financial measure, refer to ITEM 7, Financial Highlights section of this report).

The $40 thousand decrease in the portfolio.

The Componentsallowance for credit losses on loans in 2022 was largely due to a $55.4 million decrease in applicable loan balances (excludes the $107.7 million decrease in PPP loans for which there was no allowance) and improvements in the Moody's Analytics' Baseline Forecast of California unemployment rates since December 31, 2021, which decreased the quantitative "modeled" allowance for credit losses. These decreases were partially offset by adjustments to qualitative risk factors to account for the ongoing deterioration in the economic outlook that management believes is not captured in the quantitative portion of the Allowanceallowance and $23 thousand in net recoveries. For further information, refer to the Provision for LoanCredit Losses section above, and Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


As statedDue to the high credit quality of our loan portfolio experienced to date, net charge-offs have been minimal for the past several years. Net recoveries totaled $23 thousand in 2022, compared to net recoveries of $93 thousand in 2021 and net charge-offs of $1 thousand in 2020.

40


The following table presents the allowance for credit losses on loans by loan class in accordance with the methodology described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report, the overall allowance consists of 1) specific allowances for individually identified impaired loans ("ASC 310-10") and 2) general allowances for pools of loans ("ASC 450-20"), which incorporate quantitative (e.g., loan loss rates) and qualitative risk factors (e.g., portfolio growth and trends, credit concentrations, economic and regulatory factors, etc.).

The first component, specific allowances, results from the analysis of identified problem credits and the evaluation of sources of repayment including collateral, as applicable. Management evaluates these loans individually for impairment. Management considers an originated loan to be impaired when it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. For PCI loans, specific allowances are established to account for credit deterioration subsequent to acquisition if we have probable decreases in cash flows expected to be collected. For loans determined to be impaired, the extent of the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate at origination (for originated loans), based on the loan's observable market price, or based on the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent or if foreclosure is imminent. Generally, with problem credits that are collateral dependent, we obtain appraisals of the collateral at least annually. We may obtain appraisals more frequently if we believe the collateral is subject to market volatility, if a specific event has occurred to the collateral, or if we believe foreclosure is imminent. Impaired loan balances decreased to $16.9 at December 31, 2017 from $18.3 million at December 31, 2016. The specific allowance for impaired loans decreased to $513 thousand at December 31, 2017 from $991 thousand at December 31, 2016. The decreases in impaired loan balances and related reserves primarily relate to payoffs and paydowns, charge-off of an unsecured commercial loan, and changes to valuation assumptions on existing impaired loans.

The second component is an estimate of the probable inherent losses in each loan pool with similar risk characteristics. This analysis encompasses the entire loan portfolio, excluding individually identified impaired loans and acquired loans whose purchase discount has not been fully accreted. Under our allowance model, loans are evaluated on a pool basis by federal regulatory reporting codes ("CALL codes" or "segments"), which are further delineated by assigned credit risk ratings, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the allowance allocated for the second component totaled $15.3 million and $14.5 million, respectively. The increase from 2016 to 2017 primarily relates to an $84.3 million increase in loans subject to general allowances for pools of loans and elevated qualitative risk factors associated with unknown long-term impacts of the 2017 North Bay wildfires and the Bank of Napa acquisition.



Table 10 shows the allocation of the allowance by loan type as well as the percentagepercentage of total loans in each of the same loan types.classes as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Commercial and industrialCommercial real estate, owner-occupiedCommercial real estate, investor-ownedConstructionHome equityOther residentialInstallment and other consumerUnallocatedTotal
December 31, 2022        
Modeled expected credit losses$1,079 $1,497 $7,937 $453 $504 $571 $610 $— $12,651 
Qualitative adjustments706 990 4,739 1,484 54 24 258 2,068 10,323 
Specific allocations— — — — — — — 
Total$1,794 $2,487 $12,676 $1,937 $558 $595 $868 $2,068 $22,983 
Loans as a percent of total loans8.3 %17.0 %56.9 %5.5 %4.2 %5.4 %2.7 %N/A100.0 %
December 31, 2021        
Modeled expected credit losses$1,067 $2,045 $8,974 $503 $569 $642 $450 $— $14,250 
Qualitative adjustments642 731 3,765 1,150 26 171 2,286 8,773 
Specific allocations— — — — — — — — — 
Total$1,709 $2,776 $12,739 $1,653 $595 $644 $621 $2,286 $23,023 
Loans as a percent of total loans13.4 %17.4 %52.7 %5.3 %3.9 %5.1 %2.2 %N/A100.0 %
Table 10 Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Allowance balance allocation
Loans as a percent of total loans
 Allowance balance allocation
Loans as a percent of total loans
 Allowance balance allocation
Loans as a percent of total loans
 Allowance balance allocation
Loans as a percent of total loans
 Allowance balance allocation
Loans as a percent of total loans
Commercial loans$3,654
14.0% $3,248
14.7% $3,023
15.1% $2,837
15.4% $3,056
14.4%
Real Estate:              
Commercial, owner-occupied2,294
17.9
 1,753
16.7
 2,249
16.7
 1,924
16.9
 2,012
19.0
Commercial, investor6,475
49.1
 6,320
48.7
 6,178
49.4
 6,672
49.4
 6,196
49.2
Construction681
3.8
 781
5.0
 724
4.5
 839
3.6
 633
2.5
Home Equity1,031
7.9
 973
7.9
 910
7.7
 859
8.1
 875
7.8
Other residential536
5.7
 454
5.3
 394
5.0
 433
5.4
 317
5.7
Installment and other consumer378
1.6
 372
1.7
 425
1.6
 566
1.2
 629
1.4
Unallocated allowance718
N/A
 1,541
N/A
 1,096
N/A
 969
N/A
 506
 N/A
Total allowance for loan losses$15,767
  $15,442
  $14,999
  $15,099
  $14,224
 
Total percent 100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%

Table 11The table below shows the activity in the allowance for loancredit losses for each of the three years inpresented below.

Allowance for Credit Losses Rollforward
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)202220212020
Beginning balance$23,023 $22,874 $16,677 
Impact of CECL adoption— — 1,604 
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses(63)(1,449)4,594 
Initial allowance for PCD loans— 1,505 — 
Loans charged-off:
Commercial and industrial(9)— (30)
Installment and other consumer(23)(5)(1)
Total loans charged-off(32)(5)(31)
Loans recovered:
Commercial and industrial22 14 27 
Real estate:
Construction33 34 
Home equity— 50 — 
Total loans recovered55 98 30 
Net loans (charged-off) recovered23 93 (1)
Ending balance$22,983 $23,023 $22,874 
Total loans, at amortized cost$2,092,546 $2,255,645 $2,088,556 
Average total loans outstanding during year$2,175,259 $2,155,982 $2,023,203 
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans at end of year1.10 %1.02 %1.10 %
Net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loansNMNMNM
NM - Not meaningful.

Net charge-offs and recoveries for the five-year periodyears ended December 31, 2017.2022, 2021 and 2020 were considered insignificant.


Table 11 Allowance for Loan Losses
41


(dollars in thousands; unaudited)20172016201520142013
Beginning balance$15,442
$14,999
$15,099
$14,224
$13,661
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses500
(1,850)500
750
540
Loans charged-off:     
Commercial(289)(11)(5)(66)(672)
Real Estate:     
Commercial, owner occupied
(20)


Commercial, investor



(156)
Construction

(839)(204)(62)
Home equity



(176)
Other residential




Installment and other consumer(4)(5)(20)(7)(88)
Total loans charged-off(293)(36)(864)(277)(1,154)
Loans recovered:     
Commercial111
143
236
168
1,021
Real Estate:     
Commercial, owner occupied


5
84
Commercial, investor
2,156
23
45
40
Construction


96
1
Home equity
3
3
3
10
Other residential




Installment and other consumer7
27
2
85
21
Total loans recovered118
2,329
264
402
1,177
Net loans (charged-off) recovered(175)2,293
(600)125
23
Ending balance$15,767
$15,442
$14,999
$15,099
$14,224
Total loans outstanding at end of year, before deducting allowance for loan losses$1,679,013
$1,486,616
$1,451,208
$1,363,351
$1,269,322
Average total loans outstanding during year$1,511,503
$1,452,357
$1,354,564
$1,317,794
$1,092,885
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of year0.94%1.04 %1.03%1.11 %1.12 %
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans0.01%(0.16)%0.04%(0.01)% %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs (recoveries)9,009.7%(673.4)%2,499.8%(12,079.2)%(61,843.5)%
The following shows non-performing loans and loans modified in a TDR as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.



Non-Performing Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings

(dollars in thousands; unaudited)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Non-accrual loans:
Real estate:
Commercial, owner-occupied$1,563 $7,269 
Commercial, investor-owned— 694 
Home equity778 413 
Installment and other consumer91 — 
Total non-accrual loans$2,432 $8,376 
Accruing TDR loans:1
Commercial and industrial$900 $1,183 
Real estate:
Commercial, owner-occupied— — 
Commercial, investor-owned160 179 
Home equity255 130 
Installment and other consumer457 607 
Total accruing TDR loans$1,772 $2,099 
Total non-accrual and accruing TDR loans$4,204 $10,475 
Criticized and classified loans:
Special mention$60,207 $73,263 
Substandard$28,010 $36,121 
Doubtful$99 $114 
Allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans9.45x2.75x
Non-accrual loans to total loans0.12 %0.37 %
1 Excludes TDR loans on non-accrual status that are included above.
Net charge-offs totaled $175 thousand in 2017, compared to net recoveries of $2.3Non-Accrual and TDR

Non-accrual loans decreased by $5.9 million in 2016. Charge-offs in 20172022, primarily included a $283 thousand unsecured commercial loan. Recoveries in 2016 primarily resulted fromdue to the resolution and pay-offpayoff of atwo owner-occupied commercial real estate credit. The percentage of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans was 0.01% in 2017, compared to (0.16)% in 2016 and 0.04% in 2015, reflecting the factors discussed above.

Table 12 shows non-performing assets and impaired loans for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2017.

Table 12 Non-performing Assets and Impaired Loans
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Non-accrual loans:     
Commercial$
$
$21
$
$1,187
Real Estate:     
Commercial, owner-occupied


1,403
1,403
Commercial, investor

1,903
2,429
2,807
Construction

1
5,134
5,218
Home equity406
91
171
280
234
Other residential



660
Installment and other consumer
54
83
104
169
Total non-accrual loans406
145
2,179
9,350
11,678
Other real estate owned
408
421
461
461
Total non-performing assets$406
$553
$2,600
$9,811
$12,139
Accruing restructured loans:     
Commercial$2,165
$2,207
$4,562
$3,584
$4,514
Real Estate:     
Commercial, owner-occupied6,999
6,993
6,993
7,056
534
Commercial, investor2,171
2,256
513
524
2,930
Construction2,969
3,245
3,237
550
1,516
Home equity347
625
388
414
272
Other residential1,148
1,965
2,011
2,045
1,403
Installment and other consumer721
877
1,168
1,689
1,693
Total accruing restructured loans16,520
18,168
18,872
15,862
12,862
Accreting impaired PCI loans: 1
     
Commercial real estate



1,155
Commercial

137


Construction


11

Total accreting impaired PCI loans

137
11
1,155
Total non-accrual loans (from above)406
145
2,179
9,350
11,678
Total impaired loans$16,926
$18,313
$21,188
$25,223
$25,695
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans at period end3,883%10,650%688%162%122%
Non-accrual loans to total loans0.02%0.01%0.15%0.69%0.92%
1 The expected cash flows on these PCI loans declined post-acquisition, yet continue to accrete interest based on the revised expected cash flows.

Other real estate owned decreased in 2017 from the sale of two properties obtained from a bank acquisition in 2013. The decrease in total impaired loans from 2016 to 2017 primarily relates to pay-offstotaling $7.1 million and paydowns and the charge-offupgrade of an unsecured commerciala $695 thousand loan mentioned above, which wereto accrual status as a result of improved financial condition and performance, partially offset by an increase$2.0 million in loans designated as non-accrual loans. The decrease in total impaired2022. Over 96% of the non-accrual loans from 2015as of December 31, 2022 were well-secured by either commercial or residential real estate.

Non-accrual loans decreased by $857 thousand in 2021, primarily due to 2016 primarily relates to the resolution$1.0 million in payoffs and pay-off ofpaydowns, partially offset by a commercial real estate credit. The decrease in total impaired loans from 2014 to 2015 primarily relates to a previously non-accrual loan that returned to accrual status, the pay-off of a$114 thousand well-secured investor-owned commercial real estate loan assumed in the AMRB acquisition and the sale of a land development loan. The decreaseone $67 thousand home equity loan placed on non-accrual status in total impaired2021.

Total accruing TDR loans from 2013 to 2014 primarily relates to the successful resolution of several problem loans that led to pay offs, pay downs or the return of loans to accrual status, partially offset by in increase in accruing troubled debt restructured loans.

Troubled debt restructured loans, whose contractual terms were restructured in a manner that granted a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, totaled $16.5$1.8 million and $18.2$2.1 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The $327 thousand decrease from 2016in 2022 was primarily due to 2017$425 thousand in paydowns, partially offset by one loan totaling $98 thousand that was designated as TDR during 2022.

The $3.0 million decrease in 2021 was primarily relatesdue to the same reasons mentioned above. The


decrease from 2015 to 2016 primarily relates to loan pay-offs$4.0 million in paydowns and paydowns, net ofpayoffs, partially offset by two loans modifiedtotaling $1.0 million that were designated as TDRs during 2016. The decrease from 2014 to 2015 primarily relates to five loans that were removed2021.

For information regarding temporary relief from TDR designation, one sold TDR loan and pay-offs and paydowns of several other TDR loans. For more information,accounting afforded by the CARES Act, refer to the Executive Summary section above and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8, under “Troubled Debt Restructuring”.Restructuring."


Criticized and Classified Loans

Loans designated as special mention decreased by $13.1 million in 2022, primarily due to $30.2 million in upgrades to a pass risk rating, $7.7 million in paydowns and payoffs, and $3.6 million in downgrades from special mention to substandard. These decreases were partially offset by $27.8 million in downgrades from pass to special mention and $695 thousand in upgrades from substandard to special mention during 2022. Of the $27.8 million in
42


downgrades to special mention, $22.5 million (or 81%) was well-secured by commercial real estate and the remaining $5.3 million commercial loans had strong support.

Loans designated as special mention decreased by $13.6 million in 2021, primarily due to $33.1 million in upgrades to a pass risk rating, $18.9 million in paydowns and payoffs, and two loans that were downgraded from special mention to substandard totaling $5.4 million. These decreases were partially offset by $17.2 million in loans that were downgraded from pass/watch, $13.5 million in loans assumed in the AMRB acquisition, and $13.2 million in loans that were upgraded from substandard to special mention during 2021. Of the $17.2 million in downgrades to special mention, $13.2 million (or 77%) was well-secured by commercial real estate and the remaining $4.0 million in commercial loans had strong support. Loans designated as special mention exhibit potential weakness that deserve close attention.

Loans classified substandard decreased by $8.1 million in 2022, primarily due to $16.1 million in paydowns and payoffs and $871 thousand in upgrades to special mention or pass, partially offset by downgrades totaling $8.8 million. Of the downgraded loans, $4.7 million (or 53%) was secured by commercial real estate and $3.6 million (or 41%) was to commercial borrowers. In addition, of the $16.1 million in paydowns and payoffs, $2.7 million was from loans downgraded in 2022.

Loans classified substandard increased by $13.3 million in 2021, primarily due to downgrades totaling $25.4 million and $2.3 million in substandard loans assumed in the AMRB acquisition. Of the downgraded loans, $24.2 million were secured by commercial real estate. The downgrades were partially offset by $13.2 million in upgrades to special mention and $4.2 million in paydowns and payoffs.

Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report for an allocation of criticized and classified loans by loan class.

Other Assets


BOLI totaled $38.1$67.1 million at December 31, 2017,2022, compared to $32.4$61.5 million at December 31, 2016, and is recorded in other assets.2021. The increase of $5.6 million was primarily relatesdue to $4.8the purchase of $4.7 million in BOLI acquirednew policies and an increase in the cash surrender value from the Bank of Napa acquisition.net investment earnings.


OtherInterest receivable and other assets also includedtotaled $79.8 million and $51.4 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The $28.4 million increase was primarily due to a $30.5 million increase in net deferred tax assets of $8.8as discussed below.

Net deferred tax assets totaled $43.9 million and $15.3$13.3 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Deferred tax assets consist primarily of tax benefits expected to be realized in future periods related to temporary differences such as allowancethe allowances for loancredit losses and off-balance sheet creditunfunded loan commitments, net operating loss carryforwards, and deferred compensation plan and salary continuation plan, and netplans. The $30.5 million increase in 2022 was primarily due to a $30.2 million increase in deferred tax assets related to changes in unrealized losslosses on available-for-sale securities. Theinvestment securities, a $466 thousand increase in deferred tax assets related to state franchise tax and a $441 thousand decrease in 2017 primarily relatesdeferred tax liabilities related to a $3.0 million write-down ofcore deposit intangibles. These increases to net deferred tax assets duewere partially offset by a $430 thousand decrease in deferred tax assets related to the enactment of the Tax Cutsdecrease in deferred compensation and Jobs Act of 2017 on December 22, 2017. There were other fluctuations in our net deferred tax asset balances due to the Bank of Napa acquisition and other tax planning strategies.salary continuation plans. Management believes deferred tax assets will be realizable due to our consistent record of earnings and the expectation that earnings will continue at a level adequate to realize such benefits. Therefore, no valuation allowance was established as of December 31, 20172022 or 2016.2021. For additional information, refer to Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


In addition, weWe held $11.1 million and $10.2$16.7 million of FHLB stock recorded at cost in other assets at December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively. The increase is due to $918 thousand in FHLB capital stock acquired from the Bank of Napa acquisition.2021. The FHLB paid $766$1.0 million, $760 thousand and $1.2 million$654 thousand in cash dividends in 20172022, 2021 and 2016,2020, respectively. On February 21, 2018, the FHLB declared a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 2017 at an annualized dividend rate of 7.00%.

Deposits

Organic deposits increased $144.5 million, or8.2%, in 2017. Combined organic growth and deposits acquired from the Bank of Napa resulted in 21.2% total deposit growth to $2,148.7 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $1,772.7 million at December 31, 2016. Non-interest bearing deposits, including those acquired, grew by $197.1 million in 2017 and made up 47.2% of total deposits at year-end. No individual customer accounted for more than 5% of deposits. Also, see ITEM 1A. Risk Factors, for a discussion risks associated with volatility due to activity of our large deposit customers.

Table 13 Distribution of Average Deposits

Table 13 shows the relative composition of our average deposits for the years 2017, 2016 and 2015. For average rates paid on deposits,additional information, refer to Table 1 in ITEM 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
    Years ended December 31,   
 2017 2016 2015
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)     Amount
Percent
      Amount
Percent
      Amount
Percent
Non-interest bearing$899,289
48.3% $819,916
46.9% $753,038
45.8%
Interest bearing transaction105,544
5.6
 94,252
5.4
 95,662
5.8
Savings167,190
9.0
 151,214
8.6
 134,997
8.2
Money market 1
542,592
29.2
 524,989
30.0
 505,280
30.7
Time deposits, including CDARS:        
   Less than $100,00035,136
1.9
 37,359
2.2
 39,666
2.4
   $100,000 or more110,933
6.0
 121,519
6.9
 116,650
7.1
      Total time deposits146,069
7.9
 158,878
9.1
 156,316
9.5
Total average deposits$1,860,684
100.0% $1,749,249
100.0% $1,645,293
100.0%
1 Included in money market balances are Insured Cash Sweep® ("ICS") balances and Demand Deposit MarketplaceSM ("DDM") defined in Note 6
2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.




Table 14 Maturities of Time Deposits of $100,000 or moreAccrued interest on investment securities totaled $6.9 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase was due to purchases of $563.4 million in securities.


Table 14
43



Deposits

Deposits decreased by $235.2 million, to $3.573 billion at December 31, 2022, compared to $3.809 billion at December 31, 2021. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased by $71 million in 2022 and made up 51% of total deposits at year-end. The decline was a result of anticipated outflows due to planned business activities by a few large clients, some customers moving into alternative investments and normal year-end fluctuations. See ITEM 1A, Risk Factors, for a discussion of potential risks associated with concentrations and volatility due to activity of our large deposit customers. Our relationship banking model is the foundation for the strong deposit base and allows us to proactively and strategically address changes in the interest rate environment and technology adoption by our customers. With our low cost of deposits, the Bank is well-positioned to implement deposit retention strategies.

Distribution of Average Deposits

The table below shows the maturity groupingsrelative composition of our average deposits for 2022 and 2021. For average rates paid on deposits, refer to Average Statements of Condition and Analysis of Net Interest Income table in ITEM 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
As of December 31,
20222021
(in thousands; unaudited)     Average AmountPercent of TotalAverage AmountPercent of Total
Non-interest bearing$1,993,374 52.0 %$1,628,289 52.7 %
Interest-bearing transaction294,682 7.7 217,924 7.0 
Savings341,710 8.9 268,397 8.7 
Money market 1
1,065,103 27.8 864,625 27.9 
Time deposits, including CDARS:140,547 3.6 115,393 3.7 
Total average deposits$3,835,416 100.0 %$3,094,628 100.0 %
1 Money market balances include Insured Cash Sweep® ("ICS") in both 2022 and 2021. Demand Deposit Marketplace SM ("DDM") and ICS balances are discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.
Total estimated uninsured deposits as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were $1.584 billion and $1.830 billion, respectively.

Maturities of Uninsured Time Deposits

The following table shows time deposits by account that are in excess of $100,000 or more$250,000 by time remaining to maturity at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.2022.
December 31, 2022
(in thousands; unaudited)TotalUninsured Portion
Three months or less$16,758 $9,258 
Over three months through six months8,241 5,491 
Over six months through twelve months7,206 3,456 
Over twelve months12,404 5,154 
Total$44,609 $23,359 
     December 31,
(in thousands; unaudited)2017
2016
2015
Three months or less$36,669
$34,212
$29,694
Over three months through six months20,617
17,482
18,525
Over six months through twelve months22,638
26,301
35,735
Over twelve months40,481
37,122
37,969
Total$120,405
$115,117
$121,923


Borrowings


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, we had $538.9our total borrowing capacity included $711.6 million and $513.7$820.5 million in secured lines of credit with FHLB and $52.1$58.7 million and $43.1$70.8 million with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRBSF”). We also had $100.4 million (including $8.4 million assumed from Bank of Napa) and $92.0$150.0 million in unsecured lines with correspondent banks to cover any short or long-termshort-term borrowing needs at December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.

2021. FHLB overnight borrowings at December 31, 2022 were $112.0 million for a net available balance of $599.6 million. There were no FHLB overnight borrowings as ofat December 31, 2017 or 2016. On February 5, 2008, the Bank entered into a ten-year borrowing agreement under the same FHLB line of credit for $15.0 million at a fixed rate of 2.07%. On June 15, 2016, the Bank repaid the $15.0 million early and incurred a prepayment fee of $312 thousand recorded in interest expense. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, $538.9 million and $513.7 million were remaining as available for borrowing from the FHLB.2021. The FRBSF and other correspondent bank lines were not utilized at December 31, 2017 and 2016.2022 or 2021.


44


In February 2023, we increased our borrowing capacity at the FHLB by pledging certain held-to-maturity securities to the Securities-Backed Credit Program, which increased our total FHLB borrowing capacity to $1.0372 billion as of February 28, 2023 from $711.6 million as of December 31, 2022.

As part of a bank acquisition, in 2013, we assumed twoa subordinated debenturesdebenture due to the NorCal Community Bancorp Trusts I andTrust II at fair values totaling $5.0with a contractual balance of $4.1 million. On March 15, 2021, we redeemed the $2.8 million at the acquisition date,subordinated debenture (accreted value), which are being accreted up to the contractual values totaling $8.2 million over the remaining termscarried an average interest rate of the debentures. The subordinated debentures had been accreted up to $5.7 million and $5.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

5.68% in 2020. For additional information, see Note 7, to the Consolidated Financial StatementsBorrowings and Other Obligations, in ITEM 8 of this report.


Deferred Compensation Obligations


We maintain a non-qualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan for certain key management personnel. Under this plan, participating employees may defer compensation, which will entitle them to receive certain payments for up to fifteen years commencing upon retirement, death, disability or termination of employment. The participating employee may elect to receive payments over periods not to exceed fifteen years. A similar Deferred Director Fee Plan entitles participating members of the Board of Directors to receive payments as elected by the participant upon separation from service, death, disability or termination of service. At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, our aggregate payment obligations under this planboth plans totaled $3.4$7.1 million and $3.2$7.9 million, respectively.


We established aOur Salary Continuation Plan on January 1, 2011. The plan was to provide("SERP") provides a percentage of salary continuation benefits to a select group of Executive Managementexecutive management upon retirement at age sixty-five and reduced benefits upon early retirement.  At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, our liability under the Salary Continuation PlanSERP was $2.5$4.7 million (including $1.2 million assumed from Bank of Napa) and $1.0$5.3 million, respectively, and is recorded in interest payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. ThisThe Plan is unfunded and non-qualified for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.


Decreases in both the deferred compensation plan and SERP liabilities in 2022 mainly resulted from increases in benefit payments to retired employees. In addition, we increased the discount rate on the SERP payments to reflect market conditions, which reduced the present value of the SERP obligation.

For additional information, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Commitments and Contractual Obligations

We make commitments to extend credit in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. For additional information, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report. The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017.



Table 15 Contractual Obligations at December 31, 2017
 Payments due by period
(in thousands; unaudited)<1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
>5 years
Total
Operating leases$4,444
$7,956
$3,468
$2,904
$18,772
Subordinated debentures


8,248
8,248
Certificates of deposit108,352
23,511
28,252
1
160,116
Other long term liabilities (salary continuation payments)1
68
62
214
1,652
1,996
Total$112,864
$31,529
$31,934
$12,805
$189,132
1 Includes $1.96 million in future benefit payments under executive salary continuation agreements assumed from the Bank of Napa acquisition whereby participants will receive payments after reaching the age of 65. Amounts exclude future benefit payment obligations totaling $4.2 million under executive salary continuation agreements whereby the participants will receive payments upon retirement. For additional information, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.

The contractual amount of loan commitments not reflected on the consolidated statements of condition was $453.2 million and $422.3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As permitted or required under California law and to the maximum extent allowable under that law, we have certain obligations to indemnify our current and former officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity. These indemnification obligations are valid as long as the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited; however, we have a director and officer insurance policy that mitigates our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As we believe the possibility of potential claims to be remote and any amounts under the indemnifications would be covered by the insurance policy, we have not recorded an indemnification obligation.

Capital Adequacy


As discussed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report, the Bank's capital ratios arewere above regulatory guidelines to be considered "well capitalized" and Bancorp's ratios exceedexceeded the required minimum ratios for capital adequacy purposes. For further discussion of bank capital requirements, refer to the SUPERVISION AND REGULATION section in ITEM 1 of this report.

The Bank's total risk-based capital ratio increased from 14.1%14.4% at December 31, 20162021 to 14.7%15.7% at December 31, 2017,2022, primarily due to stock issued in the Bank of Napa acquisition and accumulation of undistributedcapital creation from net income, of the Bank in 2017 of $9.6 million, partially offset by increased risk weighted assets resulting froma $16.2 million dividend to the Bank of Napa acquisition.Holding Company to cover dividends to shareholders and Holding Company operating costs. Bancorp's total risk-based capital ratio increased from 14.3%was 14.6% at December 31, 2016 to 14.9%2021 and 15.9% at December 31, 2017,2022. Tangible common equity to tangible assets declined to 8.2% at December 31, 2022 from 8.8% at December 31, 2021, primarily due to stock issued$71.7 million increase in the Bank of Napa acquisition and the accumulation of undistributed net income of $9.1 million in 2017,after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities associated with interest rate changes since December 31, 2021, partially offset by increased risk weighted assets resulting fromincremental earnings and the Banksmaller balance sheet in 2022.

Bancorp's share repurchase program and activity are discussed in detail in ITEM 5 and in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of Napa acquisition.

this report. We expect to maintain strong capital levels.levels and do not expect that we will be required to raise additional capital in 2023. Our anticipated sources of capital in 20182023 include future earnings and shares issued under the stock-based compensation program.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet loan demand and to fund operating activities and deposit withdrawals. We accomplish this goal by maintaining an appropriate level of liquid assets and formal lines of credit with the FHLB, FRBSF and correspondent banks that enable us to borrow funds as discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statement in ITEM 8 of this report. Our Asset Liability Management Committee
45


("ALCO"), which is comprised of certainindependent Bank directors and the Bank's Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for approving and monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies. ALCO has adopted a contingency funding plan that provides early detection of potential liquidity issues in the market or the Bank and institutes prompt responses that may prevent or alleviate a potential liquidity crisis. Management monitors liquidity daily and regularly adjusts our position based on current and future liquidity needs. We also have relationships with third partythird-party deposit networks and can adjust the placement of our deposits via reciprocal or one-way sales as part of our cash management strategy.strategy, as discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statement in ITEM 8 of this report.
 


We obtain funds from the repayment and maturity of loans, deposit inflows, investment security maturities, sales and paydowns, federal funds purchases, FHLB advances, other borrowings, and cash flow from operations.  Our primary uses of funds are the origination of loans, the purchase of investment securities, withdrawals of deposits, maturity of certificates of deposit, repayment of borrowings, and dividends to common stockholders.

The most significant factor incomponent of our daily liquidity position has been the level ofis customer deposits. We attractThe attraction and retainretention of new deposits which depends upon the variety and effectiveness of our customer account products, service and convenience, and rates paid to customers, as well asand our financial strength. The cash cycles and unique business activities of some of our large commercial depositors may cause short-term fluctuations in their deposit balances held with us.


At December 31, 2017 our liquid assets, which included unencumbered available-for-sale securities and cash, totaled $501.9 million, an increase of $187.1 million from December 31, 2016. Our cash and cash equivalents increased $154.7decreased by $302.2 million fromto $45.4 million at December 31 2016. The primary sources of funds during 2017 included $130.32022 from $347.6 million in proceeds from sales, paydowns and maturities of investment securities, an increase in net deposits of $126.1 million, $59.8 million cash acquired, net of cash paid, from the Bank of Napa acquisition and $26.9 million net cash provided by operating activities. The primaryat December 31, 2021. Significant uses of liquidity during 20172022 were $123.2$563.4 million in investment securities purchases, $57.2purchased, $235.2 million in loan originated (netwithdrawals of loan principal collections) and $6.9deposits, $15.7 million in cash dividends paid on common stock to our shareholders.shareholders, $4.7 million in purchase of bank owned life insurance policies and $1.2 million in common stock repurchases.

The most significant sources of liquidity during 2022 were proceeds from loans collected net of originations totaling $164.0 million, proceeds from principal paydowns, maturities and sales of investment securities totaled $187.9 million and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings of $112.0 million. In addition, $55.3 million in net cash was provided by operating activities. Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in this Form 10-K for additional information on our sources and uses of liquidity. Management anticipates that our current strong liquidity position and core deposit base will provideare adequate liquidity to fund our operations.

Total immediate contingent funding sources, including unrestricted cash, unencumbered available-for-sale securities and total borrowing capacity was $1.7 billion, or 49% of total deposits as of December 31, 2022. In February 2023, we enhanced our borrowing capacity at the FHLB by pledging certain held-to-maturity securities to the Securities-Backed Credit Program, increasing the Bank's total immediate contingent funding sources to approximately $2.0 billion, or 59% of deposits as of February 28, 2023. In addition, under the Federal Reserve’s new BTFP facility, the the Bank has the option to add approximately $267 million to its borrowing capacity.

Undrawn credit commitments, as discussed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report,report, totaled $453.2$566.9 million at December 31, 2017. These2022. We expect to fund these commitments to the extent used, are expected to be fundedutilized primarily through the repayment of existing loans, deposit growth and liquid assets. Over the next twelve months, $108.4$87.0 million of time deposits will mature. We expect to replace these funds to be replaced with new deposits. Our emphasis on local deposits, combined with our well capitalized equity position,liquid investment portfolio, provides a very stable funding base.

Since Bancorp is a holding company and does not conduct regular banking operations, its primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank. Under the California Financial Code, payment of a dividend from the Bank to Bancorp without advance regulatory approval is restricted to the lesser of the Bank’s retained earnings or the amount of the Bank’s net profits from the previous three fiscal years less the amount of dividends paid during that period. The primary uses of funds for Bancorp are shareholder dividends, and ordinary operating expenses.expenses and stock repurchases.  Bancorp held $3.2$4.5 million of cash at December 31, 20172022. In January 2018, Bancorp obtained a dividend distribution from the Bank totaling $6.3 million, which is deemed sufficient to cover Bancorp's operational needs and cash dividends to shareholders through the end of 2018. ManagementManagement anticipates that there will be sufficient earnings at the Bank to provide dividends to Bancorp to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future.




Quarterly Financial Data

Table 16 Summary of Quarterly Financial Data
 2017 Quarters Ended 2016 Quarters Ended
(dollars in thousands; unaudited)Dec. 31
Sept. 30
Jun. 30
Mar. 31
 Dec. 31
Sept. 30
Jun. 30
Mar. 31
Interest income$20,650
$19,211
$18,703
$18,032
 $18,408
$19,834
$17,993
$19,195
Interest expense511
423
399
411
 432
453
827
557
Net interest income20,139
18,788
18,304
17,621
 17,976
19,381
17,166
18,638
     Provision for (reversal of) loan losses500



 (300)(1,550)

Net interest income after provision for         
   (reversal of) loan losses19,639
18,788
18,304
17,621
 18,276
20,931
17,166
18,638
Non-interest income1,991
2,066
2,096
2,115
 2,463
2,114
2,421
2,163
Non-interest expense15,104
13,036
12,631
13,011
 11,755
11,910
12,017
12,010
Income before provision for income taxes6,526
7,818
7,769
6,725
 8,984
11,135
7,570
8,791
     Provision for income taxes5,416
2,686
2,583
2,177
 3,297
4,171
2,733
3,145
Net income$1,110
$5,132
$5,186
$4,548
 $5,687
$6,964
$4,837
$5,646
Net income available to common stockholders$1,110
$5,132
$5,186
$4,548
 $5,687
$6,964
$4,837
$5,646
          
   Net income per common share:         
     Basic$0.17
$0.84
$0.85
$0.75
 $0.93
$1.14
$0.80
$0.93
     Diluted$0.17
$0.83
$0.84
$0.74
 $0.93
$1.14
$0.79
$0.93

Refer to the Executive Summary section above for a discussion of items that affected the financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2017, including a one-time deferred tax asset write-down due to the enactment of the new federal tax law on December 22, 2017, and expenses related to the acquisition of Bank of Napa.

ITEM 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureDisclosures about MarketRisk


Market risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from an adverse change in the market value (or prices) of financial instruments. A significant formcomponent of market risk is interest rate risk, which is inherent in our lending, investment,
46


borrowing, lending and deposit gathering activities. The Bank manages interest rate sensitivity to minimize the exposure of our net interest margin, earnings, and capital to changes in interest rates. Interest rate changes can create fluctuations in the net interest margin due to an imbalance in the timing of repricing or maturity of assets or liabilities. Interest rate changes can also affect the market value of our financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities and the related unrealized gains or losses, which affects our equity value.


To mitigate interest rate risk, the structure of the Consolidated Statement of Conditionour assets and liabilities is managed with the objective of correlating the effects of interest rate changes on loans and investments with those of deposits and borrowings. The asset liability management policy sets limits on the acceptable amount of change to net interest income and economic value of equity in different interest rate environments.


From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap contracts to mitigate the changes in the fair value of specified long-term fixed-rate loans and firm commitments to enter into long-term fixed-rate loans caused by changes in interest rates. SeeRefer to Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 8 of this report.


Exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed at least quarterly by ALCO and the Board of Directors. SimulationDirectors review our exposure to interest rate risk at least quarterly. We use simulation models are used to measure interest rate risk and to evaluate strategies to improve profitability. A simplified static statement of condition is prepared on a quarterly basis as a starting point, using instrument level data of our actual loans, investments, borrowings and deposits as inputs. If potential changes to net equity value and net interest income resulting from hypothetical interest rate changes are not within the limits established by the Board of Directors, Managementmanagement may adjust the asset and liability mix to bring the risk position within approved limits.

The Bank currently is slightly asset sensitive. Our net interest margin is expected to increase if rates go up, primarily due to our cash earning the Federal Funds rate, adjustable rate loans and our significant non-interest bearing deposit base. Our net interest income remains most vulnerable to a falling interest rate environment.

The following table estimates the effect of interest rate changes in all points of the yield curve as measured against a flat rate scenario. Thelimits or take other actions. At December 31, 2022, interest rate risk iswas within policy guidelines established by ALCO and the BoardBoard. One set of Directors.interest rates modeled and evaluated against flat interest rates and a static balance sheet is a series of immediate parallel shifts in the yield curve. Our most recent analysis of our interest rate sensitivity is provided in the following table as an example rather than an expectation of likely interest rate movements.

Effect of Interest Rate Change on Net Interest Income (NII)
Immediate Changes in Interest Rates (in basis points)Estimated Change in NII in Year 1 (as percent of NII)Estimated Change in NII in Year 2 (as percent of NII)
up 400(10.2)%(0.6)%
up 300(7.7)%(0.5)%
up 200(5.1)%(0.4)%
up 100(2.4)%0.3%
down 100(0.5)%(2.3)%
down 200(1.5)%(4.2)%


Table 17 Effect of Interest Rate Change on Net Interest Income (NII) at December 31, 2017 
Immediate Changes in Interest Rates (in basis points)Estimated Change in NII in Year 1 (as percent of NII)Estimated Change in NII in Year 2 (as percent of NII)
up 4003.1%12.9%
up 3002.5%10.1%
up 2001.9%7.1%
up 1001.3%4.4%
down 100(6.8)%(11.5)%

Interest rate sensitivity is a function of the repricing characteristics of our assets and liabilities. The Bank runs a combination of scenarios and sensitivities in its attempt to capture the range of interest rate risk.risk including the simulations mentioned above. As with any simulation model or other method of measuring interest rate risk, limitations are inherent in the process and dependent on assumptions. For example, if we choose to pay interest on certain business deposits that are currently non-interest bearing, causing thesethose deposits to become rate sensitive in the future, we would become less asset sensitive than the model currently indicates. AssetsAdditionally, assets and liabilities may react differently to changes in market interest rates in terms of both timing and responsiveness to market rate movements. Further,Important deposit modeling assumptions include the speed of deposit run-off and the amount by which interest-bearing deposit rates increase or decrease when market interest rates change, otherwise known as the deposit beta. We applied an average deposit beta of 35% to rates paid on non-maturity interest-bearing deposits in rising rate scenarios, reflected in the table above. The actual rates and timing of prepayments on loans and investment securities and the behavior of depositors, could vary significantly from the assumptions applied in the various scenarios. Lastly, uneven changes in different tenors of U.S. Treasury rates accompanied by a changethat result in changes to the shape of the yield curve could produce different results from those presented in the table. Accordingly, the results presented should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in the event of changing market interest rates.







47


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


TheTo the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bank of Marin Bancorp


Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Bank of Marin Bancorp and subsidiary,Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework 2013(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework 2013(2013) issued by COSO.


Basis for Opinions


The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying:accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in ITEM 8.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.



48


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions


are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans

As discussed in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for credit losses for loans at December 31, 2022, was $23 million on a total loan portfolio of $2.1 billion. The allowance for credit losses provides an estimate of lifetime expected losses in the loan portfolio. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets.

We identified the allowance for credit losses for loans as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for our determination of the allowance for credit losses for loans as a critical audit matter are subjectivity of the estimation and application of forecasted economic conditions and qualitative internal and external risk factors used in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses for loans. The economic forecast component of the allowance for credit losses for loans is used to compare the conditions that existed during the historical period to current conditions and future expectations. The qualitative internal and external risk factors are used to adjust for differences in segment-specific risk characteristics or conditions that differ from those that existed during the historical period for which the probability of default and loss given default factors were developed. Auditing management’s judgements regarding forecasted economic conditions and qualitative internal and external risk factors applied to the allowance for credit losses for loans involved a high degree of subjectivity.


49


The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of controls related to management’s calculation of the allowance for credit losses for loans, including controls over qualitative internal and external risk factors and the forecasted economic conditions utilized.
Testing the appropriateness of the methodology used in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses for loans, as well as testing completeness and accuracy of the data used in the calculation, application of the forecasted economic conditions, and qualitative internal and external risk factors determined by management and used in the calculation, and verifying calculations in the allowance for credit losses for loans.
Obtaining management’s analysis and supporting documentation related to the forecasted economic conditions, and testing whether the forecasts used in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses for loans are reasonable and supportable based on the analysis provided by management.
Obtaining management’s analysis of internal and external qualitative factors, and evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions used in determining the qualitative factor adjustments.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP
San Francisco, California
Portland, Oregon
March 14, 201815, 2023


We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2004.

50




March 14, 201815, 2023




Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Management of Bank of Marin Bancorp and subsidiary, (the "Company") is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company's assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and board of directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention, or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, Managementmanagement has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2022.


The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams LLP, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which appears on the previous page.








/s/ Russell A. ColomboTimothy D. Myers
Russell A. Colombo,Timothy D. Myers, President and Chief Executive Officer






/s/ Tani Girton
Tani Girton, EVP and Chief Financial Officer




51


BANK OF MARIN BANCORP
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OFCONDITION
December 31, 20172022 and 20162021
(in thousands, except share data)20172016(in thousands, except share data)20222021
Assets 
 Assets  
Cash and due from banks$203,545
$48,804
Investment securities 
 
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost151,032
44,438
Available-for-sale, at fair value332,467
372,580
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$45,424 $347,641 
Investment securities:Investment securities: 
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (net of zero allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 and 2021)Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (net of zero allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 and 2021)972,207 342,222 
Available-for-sale, at fair value (net of zero allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 and 2021)Available-for-sale, at fair value (net of zero allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 and 2021)802,096 1,167,568 
Total investment securities483,499
417,018
Total investment securities1,774,303 1,509,790 
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $15,767 and $15,442 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively1,663,246
1,471,174
Loans, at amortized costLoans, at amortized cost2,092,546 2,255,645 
Allowance for credit losses on loansAllowance for credit losses on loans(22,983)(23,023)
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses on loansLoans, net of allowance for credit losses on loans2,069,563 2,232,622 
GoodwillGoodwill72,754 72,754 
Bank-owned life insuranceBank-owned life insurance67,066 61,473 
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease right-of-use assets24,821 23,604 
Bank premises and equipment, net8,612
8,520
Bank premises and equipment, net8,134 7,558 
Goodwill30,140
6,436
Core deposit intangible6,492
2,580
Core deposit intangible, netCore deposit intangible, net5,116 6,605 
Other real estate ownedOther real estate owned455 800 
Interest receivable and other assets72,620
68,961
Interest receivable and other assets79,828 51,362 
Total assets$2,468,154
$2,023,493
Total assets$4,147,464 $4,314,209 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
Liabilities 
 
Liabilities 
Deposits 
 
Deposits:Deposits: 
Non-interest bearing$1,014,103
$817,031
Non-interest bearing$1,839,114 $1,910,240 
Interest bearing 


Interest bearing:Interest bearing: 
Transaction accounts169,195
100,723
Transaction accounts287,651 290,813 
Savings accounts178,473
163,516
Savings accounts338,163 340,959 
Money market accounts626,783
539,967
Money market accounts989,390 1,116,303 
Time accounts160,116
151,463
Time accounts119,030 150,235 
Total deposits2,148,670
1,772,700
Total deposits3,573,348 3,808,550 
Subordinated debentures5,739
5,586
Borrowings and other obligationsBorrowings and other obligations112,439 419 
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities26,639 25,429 
Interest payable and other liabilities16,720
14,644
Interest payable and other liabilities22,946 29,443 
Total liabilities2,171,129
1,792,930
Total liabilities3,735,372 3,863,841 
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 12)Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 12)
Stockholders' Equity 
 
Stockholders' Equity 
Preferred stock, no par value,
Authorized - 5,000,000 shares, none issued


Preferred stock, no par value,
Authorized - 5,000,000 shares, none issued
— — 
Common stock, no par value,
Authorized - 15,000,000 shares;
Issued and outstanding - 6,921,542 and 6,127,314 at December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively
143,967
87,392
Common stock, no par value,
Authorized - 30,000,000 shares;
Issued and outstanding - 16,029,138 and 15,929,243 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively
Common stock, no par value,
Authorized - 30,000,000 shares;
Issued and outstanding - 16,029,138 and 15,929,243 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively
215,057 212,524 
Retained earnings155,544
146,464
Retained earnings270,781 239,868 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(2,486)(3,293)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxAccumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(73,746)(2,024)
Total stockholders' equity297,025
230,563
Total stockholders' equity412,092 450,368 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$2,468,154
$2,023,493
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$4,147,464 $4,314,209 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

52



BANK OF MARIN BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

Years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020
(in thousands, except per share amounts)201720162015(in thousands, except per share amounts)202220212020
Interest income Interest income
Interest and fees on loans$66,799
$67,472
$61,754
Interest and fees on loans$93,868 $91,612 $84,674 
Interest on investment securities 
 
 Interest on investment securities34,766 16,342 14,503 
Securities of U.S. government agencies6,463
5,155
4,709
Obligations of state and political subdivisions2,195
2,339
2,155
Corporate debt securities and other144
256
685
Interest on federal funds sold and due from banks995
208
135
Interest on federal funds sold and due from banks1,407 399 461 
Total interest income76,596
75,430
69,438
Total interest income130,041 108,353 99,638 
Interest expense 
 
 Interest expense 
Interest on interest-bearing transaction accounts108
109
115
Interest on interest-bearing transaction accounts421 172 186 
Interest on savings accounts66
58
51
Interest on savings accounts125 94 68 
Interest on money market accounts555
445
495
Interest on money market accounts1,589 1,520 2,009 
Interest on time accounts576
743
853
Interest on time accounts323 246 554 
Interest on FHLB and overnight borrowings
478
317
Interest on subordinated debentures439
436
420
Interest on borrowings and other obligationsInterest on borrowings and other obligations91 
Interest on subordinated debentureInterest on subordinated debenture— 1,361 158 
Total interest expense1,744
2,269
2,251
Total interest expense2,549 3,402 2,979 
Net interest income74,852
73,161
67,187
Net interest income127,492 104,951 96,659 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses500
(1,850)500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses74,352
75,011
66,687
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on loans(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on loans(63)(1,449)4,594 
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments(318)(992)1,570 
Net interest income after (reversal of) provision for credit lossesNet interest income after (reversal of) provision for credit losses127,873 107,392 90,495 
Non-interest income 
 
 Non-interest income 
Wealth Management and Trust ServicesWealth Management and Trust Services2,227 2,222 1,851 
Debit card interchange fees, netDebit card interchange fees, net2,051 1,812 1,438 
Service charges on deposit accounts1,784
1,789
1,979
Service charges on deposit accounts2,007 1,593 1,314 
Wealth Management and Trust Services2,090
2,090
2,391
Debit card interchange fees1,531
1,503
1,445
Merchant interchange fees398
449
545
Earnings on bank-owned life Insurance845
844
814
Dividends on FHLB stock766
1,153
1,003
(Losses) gains on investment securities, net(185)425
79
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance, netEarnings on bank-owned life insurance, net1,229 2,194 973 
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stockDividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stock1,056 760 654 
Merchant interchange fees, netMerchant interchange fees, net549 422 239 
(Losses) gains on sale of investment securities, net(Losses) gains on sale of investment securities, net(63)(16)915 
Other income1,039
908
937
Other income1,849 1,145 1,166 
Total non-interest income8,268
9,161
9,193
Total non-interest income10,905 10,132 8,550 
Non-interest expense 
 
 Non-interest expense 
Salaries and related benefits29,958
26,663
25,764
Salaries and employee benefitsSalaries and employee benefits42,046 41,939 34,393 
Occupancy and equipment5,472
5,081
5,498
Occupancy and equipment7,823 7,297 6,943 
Depreciation and amortization1,941
1,822
1,968
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance666
825
997
Data processing4,906
3,625
3,318
Data processing4,649 5,139 3,184 
Professional services2,858
2,044
2,121
Professional services3,299 4,974 2,181 
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization1,840 1,740 2,149 
Information technologyInformation technology2,197 1,550 1,050 
Amortization of core deposit intangibleAmortization of core deposit intangible1,489 1,135 853 
Directors' expense720
553
826
Directors' expense1,107 957 713 
Information technology769
862
736
Provision for losses on off-balance sheet commitments57
150
(263)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insuranceFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance1,179 889 474 
Charitable contributionsCharitable contributions709 587 1,034 
Other real estate ownedOther real estate owned359 — 
Other expense6,435
6,067
5,984
Other expense8,572 6,426 5,484 
Total non-interest expense53,782
47,692
46,949
Total non-interest expense75,269 72,638 58,458 
Income before provision for income taxes28,838
36,480
28,931
Income before provision for income taxes63,509 44,886 40,587 
Provision for income taxes12,862
13,346
10,490
Provision for income taxes16,923 11,658 10,345 
Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Net income per common share: Net income per common share:
Basic$2.58
$3.81
$3.09
Basic$2.93 $2.32 $2.24 
Diluted$2.55
$3.78
$3.04
Diluted$2.92 $2.30 $2.22 
Weighted average shares: 
Weighted average common shares:Weighted average common shares:
Basic6,196
6,073
5,966
Basic15,921 14,340 13,525 
Diluted6,273
6,115
6,065
Diluted15,969 14,422 13,617 
Dividends declared per common share$1.12
$1.02
$0.90
Comprehensive income:



 
Comprehensive (loss) income:Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Other comprehensive income (loss): 
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities3,671
(5,679)(1,481)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securitiesChange in net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities(88,620)(21,281)11,891 
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) on available-for-sale securities in net income185
(394)(6)Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) on available-for-sale securities in net income63 16 (915)
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity(3,036)

Net unrealized losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturityNet unrealized losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity(14,847)— — 
Amortization of net unrealized losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity426
21
61
Amortization of net unrealized losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity1,580 493 524 
Subtotal1,246
(6,052)(1,426)
Deferred tax expense (benefit)439
(2,566)(531)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax807
(3,486)(895)
Comprehensive income$16,783
$19,648
$17,546
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before taxOther comprehensive (loss) income, before tax(101,824)(20,772)11,500 
Deferred tax (benefit) expenseDeferred tax (benefit) expense(30,102)(6,147)3,402 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxOther comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(71,722)(14,625)8,098 
Comprehensive (loss) incomeComprehensive (loss) income$(25,136)$18,603 $38,340 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

53



BANK OF MARIN BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020
(in thousands, except share data)Common StockRetained
Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Taxes
 Total
SharesAmount
Balance at December 31, 201913,577,008 $129,058 $203,227 $4,503 $336,788 
Net income— — 30,242 — 30,242 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — 8,098 8,098 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal ASU 2016-131
— — (1,216)— (1,216)
Stock options exercised, net of shares surrendered for cashless exercises and tax withholdings65,407 1,304 — — 1,304 
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan2,392 72 — — 72 
Stock issued under employee stock ownership plan39,900 1,289 — — 1,289 
Restricted stock granted29,100 — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for tax withholdings upon vesting(2,200)(73)— — (73)
Restricted stock forfeited / cancelled(14,314)— — — — 
Stock-based compensation - stock options— 319 — — 319 
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock— 884 — — 884 
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.92 per share)
— — (12,506)— (12,506)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan1,146 43 — — 43 
Stock issued in payment of director fees5,723 217 — — 217 
Stock repurchased, including commissions(203,709)(7,208)— — (7,208)
Balance at December 31, 202013,500,453 $125,905 $219,747 $12,601 $358,253 
Net income— — 33,228 — 33,228 
Other comprehensive loss— — — (14,625)(14,625)
Stock options exercised, net of shares surrendered for cashless exercises and tax withholdings36,338 463 — — 463 
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan2,648 90 — — 90 
Stock issued under employee stock ownership plan36,075 1,330 — — 1,330 
Restricted stock granted30,742 — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for tax withholdings upon vesting(4,211)(166)— — (166)
Restricted stock forfeited / cancelled(3,848)— — — — 
Stock-based compensation - stock options— 491 — — 491 
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock— 481 — — 481 
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.94 per share)— — (13,107)— (13,107)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan1,034 34 — — 34 
Stock issued in payment of director fees6,443 217 — — 217 
Stock issued to American River Bankshares shareholders3,441,235 124,401 — — 124,401 
Stock repurchased, including commissions(1,117,666)(40,722)— — (40,722)
Balance at December 31, 202115,929,243 $212,524 $239,868 $(2,024)$450,368 
Net income— — 46,586 — 46,586 
Other comprehensive loss— — — (71,722)(71,722)
Stock options exercised, net of shares surrendered for cashless exercises and tax withholdings40,674 821 — — 821 
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan2,025 62 — — 62 
Stock issued under employee stock ownership plan38,000 1,233 — — 1,233 
Restricted stock granted46,672 — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for tax withholdings upon vesting(1,169)(40)— — (40)
Restricted stock forfeited / cancelled(13,692)— — — — 
Stock-based compensation - stock options— 251 — — 251 
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock— 712 — — 712 
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.98 per share)— — (15,673)— (15,673)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan515 16 — — 16 
Stock issued in payment of director fees10,145 355 — — 355 
Stock repurchased, including commissions(23,275)(877)— — (877)
Balance at December 31, 202216,029,138 $215,057 $270,781 $(73,746)$412,092 
(in thousands, except share data)Common Stock
Retained
Earnings

Accumulated Other Comprehensive
 Income (Loss),
Net of Taxes

 Total
Shares
Amount
Balance at December 31, 20145,939,482
$82,436
$116,502
$1,088
$200,026
Net income

18,441

18,441
Other comprehensive loss


(895)(895)
Stock options exercised37,071
1,139


1,139
Excess tax benefit - stock-based compensation
212


212
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan339
17


17
Restricted stock granted15,970




Restricted stock forfeited / cancelled(450)



Stock-based compensation - stock options
252


252
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
384


384
Cash dividends paid on common stock

(5,390)
(5,390)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan245
12


12
Stock issued in payment of director fees5,295
275


275
Stock issued from exercise of warrants70,591




Balance at December 31, 20156,068,543
$84,727
$129,553
$193
$214,473
Net income

23,134

23,134
Other comprehensive loss


(3,486)(3,486)
Stock options exercised36,117
1,227


1,227
Excess tax benefit - stock-based compensation
161


161
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan621
32


32
Restricted stock granted16,910




Stock-based compensation - stock options
347


347
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
638


638
Cash dividends paid on common stock

(6,223)
(6,223)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan516
26


26
Stock issued in payment of director fees4,607
234


234
Balance at December 31, 20166,127,314
$87,392
$146,464
$(3,293)$230,563
Net income

15,976

15,976
Other comprehensive income


807
807
Stock options exercised, net of shares surrendered for cashless exercises and tax withholdings9,266
28


28
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan512
32


32
Stock issued under employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP")29,547
1,850


1,850
Restricted stock granted16,230




Stock-based compensation - stock options
529


529
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
742


742
Cash dividends paid on common stock

(6,896)
(6,896)
Stock purchased by directors under director stock plan531
35


35
Stock issued in payment of director fees2,878
188


188
Stock and stock options issued to Bank of Napa shareholders (net of payment for fractional shares of $14 thousand)735,264
53,171


53,171
Balance at December 31, 20176,921,542
$143,967
$155,544
$(2,486)$297,025

1 Refer to Note 1, Summary of Accounting Policies, for information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13 in 2020.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

54


BANK OF MARIN BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020
(in thousands)202220212020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on loans(63)(1,449)4,594 
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments(318)(992)1,570 
Noncash contribution expense to employee stock ownership plan1,233 1,330 1,289 
Noncash director compensation expense355 217 217 
Stock-based compensation expense963 972 1,203 
Amortization of core deposit intangible1,489 1,135 853 
Amortization of investment security premiums, net of accretion of discounts9,056 5,799 1,354 
Amortization of premiums (accretion of discounts) on acquired loans, net153 (571)(165)
Accretion of discount on subordinated debenture— 1,347 69 
Net change in deferred loan origination costs/fees(2,716)(3,155)5,040 
Write-down of other real estate owned345 — — 
Losses (gains) on sale of investment securities, net63 16 (915)
Depreciation and amortization1,840 1,740 2,149 
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance policies(1,229)(2,194)(973)
Net changes in interest receivable and other assets2,228 5,554 (5,135)
Net changes in interest payable and other liabilities(4,708)2,276 (547)
Total adjustments8,691 12,025 10,603 
Net cash provided by operating activities55,277 45,253 40,845 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:   
Purchase of held-to-maturity securities(319,937)(305,329)— 
Purchase of available-for-sale securities(243,459)(620,236)(97,544)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities10,664 6,632 33,756 
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities of held-to-maturity securities47,098 71,682 28,144 
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities of available-for-sale securities130,178 110,059 114,991 
Loan principal collected, net of originations164,019 256,856 (249,337)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance policies(4,714)(1,943)(941)
Cash receipts from bank-owned life insurance policies350 2,478 — 
Purchase of premises and equipment(2,266)(1,044)(981)
Cash and cash equivalents acquired from American River Bankshares— 140,577 — 
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock— — (176)
Cash paid for low income housing tax credit investment(30)(398)(1,355)
Net cash used in investing activities(218,097)(340,666)(173,443)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Net (decrease) increase in deposits(235,202)514,279 167,760 
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings (repayment)112,000 (13,885)— 
Repayment of finance lease obligations(131)(86)(172)
Repayment of subordinated debenture including execution costs— (4,126)— 
Proceeds from stock options exercised821 463 1,304 
Restricted stock surrendered for tax withholdings upon vesting(40)(166)(73)
Cash dividends paid on common stock(15,673)(13,107)(12,506)
Stock repurchased, including commissions(1,250)(40,762)(6,898)
Proceeds from stock issued under employee and director stock purchase plans78 124 115 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(139,397)442,734 149,530 
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(302,217)147,321 16,932 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period347,641 200,320 183,388 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$45,424 $347,641 $200,320 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid in interest$2,560 $2,105 $2,948 
Cash paid in income taxes$14,325 $12,350 $13,065 
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities$(88,620)$(21,281)$11,891 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ASU 2016-13$— $— $(1,216)
Amortization of net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities transferred to held-to-maturity$1,580 $493 $524 
Repurchase of stock not yet settled$— $373 $413 
Securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity$357,482 $— $— 
Acquisition: Fair value of assets acquired, excluding cash and cash equivalents$— $757,844 $— 
                 Fair value of liabilities assumed$— $816,558 $— 
Restricted cash 1
$— $4,395��$2,700 
1Restricted cash includes reserve requirements held with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and other cash pledged. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced the reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective March 26, 2020.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
(in thousands)201720162015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
 
 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses500
(1,850)500
Provision for (reversal of) losses on off-balance sheet commitments57
150
(263)
Write-down of deferred tax assets, net3,017


Noncash contribution expense to employee stock ownership plan1,152


Noncash director compensation expense-common stock197
180
274
Stock-based compensation expense1,271
985
636
Amortization of core deposit intangible529
533
619
Amortization of investment security premiums, net of accretion of discounts2,912
3,212
2,825
Accretion of discount on acquired loans(902)(1,775)(1,883)
Accretion of discount on subordinated debentures153
191
210
Net amortization of deferred loan origination costs/fees65
114
(281)
(Gain on sale) write-down of other real estate owned(6)13
40
Loss (gain) on sale of investment securities185
(425)(79)
Depreciation and amortization1,941
1,822
1,968
Loss on disposal of premises and equipment
3
4
Earnings on bank owned life insurance policies(845)(844)(814)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:   
Deferred rent and other rent-related expenses(12)(254)(4)
Interest receivable and other assets(278)581
347
Interest payable and other liabilities1,035
(324)1,142
Net cash provided by operating activities26,947
25,446
23,682
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
 
 
Purchase of held-to-maturity securities(4,497)(2,424)(2,375)
Purchase of available-for-sale securities(118,666)(161,374)(287,144)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities55,408
68,673
2,099
Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities
1,265
1,015
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities of held-to-maturity securities48,559
25,779
47,181
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities of available-for-sale securities26,333
129,669
64,839
Loans originated and principal collected, net(57,181)(32,005)(88,123)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance policies
(2,133)
Purchase of premises and equipment(1,434)(1,040)(1,418)
Proceeds from sale of loan

1,502
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned414


Cash acquired from the Bank of Napa acquisition59,779


Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(1,791)(136)
Cash paid for low income housing investment(902)(301)(718)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities7,813
24,318
(263,278)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
 
 
Net increase in deposits126,084
44,474
176,607
Proceeds from stock options exercised88
1,388
1,326
Payment of tax withholding for stock options exercised(60)

Federal Home Loan Bank (repayments) borrowings
(67,000)52,000
Cash dividends paid on common stock(6,896)(6,223)(5,390)
Proceeds from stock issued under employee and director stock purchase plans and ESOP765
58
29
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities119,981
(27,303)224,572
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents154,741
22,461
(15,024)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period48,804
26,343
41,367
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$203,545
$48,804
$26,343
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow items, non-cash investing and financing activities:   
Cash paid in interest$1,535
$2,131
$2,066
Cash paid in income taxes$9,761
$13,365
$9,068
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities$1,246
$(6,052)$(1,426)
Stock issued in payment of director fees and to ESOP$1,340
$234
$275
Subscription in low income housing tax credit investment$
$
$1,023
Securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity$128,965
$
$
Transfer of loan to loans held-for-sale at fair value$
$
$1,502
Acquisition: Merger consideration - stock and stock options issued to the Bank of Napa shareholders$53,185
$
$
                    Fair value of assets acquired, excluding cash acquired$245,342
$
$
                    Fair value of liabilities assumed$251,938
$
$
55
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATEDFINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1:  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Nature of Operations - Bank of Marin Bancorp ("Bancorp"), headquartered in Novato, California, conducts business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of Marin (the "Bank"), a California state-chartered commercial bank that provides a wide range of financial services through 31 retail branches and 8 commercial banking offices across 10 counties, including Alameda, Amador, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Placer, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Mateo and Sonoma. Our customer base is made up of business, not-for-profit and personal banking relationships from the communities within our Northern California footprint.

Basis of Presentation: - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bank of Marin Bancorp, (“Bancorp”), a bank holding company, and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Bank of Marin, (the “Bank”), a California state-chartered commercial bank. References to “we,” “our,” “us” mean Bancorp and the Bank that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Our accounting and reporting policies conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), general practice, and regulatory guidance within the banking industry. A summary of our significant policies follows. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated. We havemonitor financial performance and evaluate the revenue streams of the various products, services, locations, and operations on a company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the community banking and wealth management and trust services are considered by management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment, community banking. We evaluated subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and have determined that there arewere no subsequent events that requirerequired additional recognition or disclosure.


The NorCal Community Bancorp Trusts IAccounting Changes and II, respectively (the "Trusts"), were formed forReclassifications - Certain items in prior financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. Bancorp is not consideredcurrent presentation, including the primary beneficiaryreclassification of the Trusts (variable interest entities), therefore the Trusts are not consolidated in our consolidated financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liabilityprovision for credit losses on our consolidated statements of condition (See Note 7, Borrowings). Bancorp's investmentunfunded commitments in the securitiessecond quarter of the Trusts is accounted for2021 from non-interest expense to a separate line item under the equity method and is includedprovision for credit losses on loans in interest receivable and other assets on the consolidated statements of condition.comprehensive (loss) income. In addition, on December 31, 2020, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and all applicable amendments as subsequently updated for certain clarifications, targeted relief and codification improvements. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326 (“ASC 326”) replaced the incurred loss method for measuring credit losses with a current expected credit loss ("CECL") method for financial assets recorded at amortized cost (i.e., loans originated by us and held-to-maturity investment securities). The previous incurred loss method included a general allowance on loans for known and inherent losses within the portfolio, which reflected adjusted historical loss rates and a specific allowance component for impaired loans. The CECL method requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures to consider credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial asset based on past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. ASC 326 also requires enhanced disclosures related to the significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards. In addition, ASC 326 include certain changes to the accounting for available-for-sale investment securities including the requirement to recognize an allowance when management intends to sell or believes that it is more likely than not they will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost.


NatureASC 326 was effective January 1, 2020. However, in accordance with the accounting relief provisions of Operations: Bancorp, headquarteredthe Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security ("CARES") Act passed in Novato, CA, conducts businessMarch 2020, we postponed the adoption of the CECL standard to the earlier of the end of the national emergency or December 31, 2020. Therefore, we adopted this standard using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost, and off-balance-sheet credit exposures, effective October 1, 2020 (the beginning of the first reporting period in which the standard was effective due to the postponement of CECL) through a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. Results for reporting periods beginning after September 30, 2020 have been presented under the new standard while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Upon adoption, we recorded a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings, net of taxes, based on economic forecasts and other assumptions as of January 1, 2020. That adjustment resulted in an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $1.6 million and an increase to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments of $122 thousand. In addition, we recognized the remaining difference between the allowance for credit losses calculated under the CECL model as of December 31, 2020 and the allowance for credit losses calculated under the incurred loss model as of September 30, 2020 as a reversal of the provision for credit losses and a provision for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments, as shown in the tables below.
56



The following tables show the impact to our financial statement line items due to adoption of ASC 326 as of and during the quarter ended December 31, 2020.
(in thousands)Pre-Tax Increase (Decrease) Upon the Adoption of CECLDeferred Tax EffectAfter Tax Impact of Adoption of CECL
Impact to allowance for credit losses on loans:
Allowance for credit losses on loans$748 
Retained earnings (cumulative transition adjustment)$(1,604)$474 $(1,130)
Net income (reversal of provision for credit losses on loans)$856 $(253)$603 
Impact to allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments:
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments$1,082 
Retained earnings (cumulative transition adjustment)$(122)$36 $(86)
Net income (provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments)$(960)$284 $(676)

The following table shows the impact on the allowance for credit losses due to the transition from the incurred loss method to the CECL method by loan class.
(in thousands)Pre-Adoption Balance at
September 30, 2020
Cumulative Transition Adjustment 1
Post Adoption Adjusted Balance at
October 1, 2020
Allowance for credits losses on loans:
Commercial and industrial$2,525 $(278)$2,247 
Real estate:
  Commercial owner-occupied3,135 138 3,273 
  Commercial investor-owned11,624 1,755 13,379 
  Construction860 201 1,061 
  Home equity1,038 (361)677 
  Other residential1,260 (212)1,048 
Installment and other consumer loans406 (125)281 
Unallocated1,265 486 1,751 
Total$22,113 $1,604 $23,717 
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments$1,697 $122 $1,819 
1 The cumulative transition adjustment resulted from applying the CECL method, which was based on economic forecasts and other assumptions as of January 1, 2020. Refer to Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses, for more information.
The Bank did not record an allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale or held-to-maturity investment securities upon the adoption of CECL as the investment portfolio consisted primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiary,of debt securities backed by the Bank, which providesU.S. government and high credit quality obligations of state and political subdivisions. Refer to Note 2, Investment Securities, for more information.

In the second quarter of 2021, we reclassified the provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments from non-interest expense to a wide rangeseparate line item under the provision for credit losses on loans in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Use of Estimates -The preparation of financial servicesstatements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to customers, who are predominantly professionals, smallmake estimates and middle-market businesses,assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and individuals who work and/or resideliabilities and disclosure of contingent amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in Marin, Sonoma, Napa, San Franciscothe consolidated financial statements include the allowance for credit losses, income taxes, and Alameda counties. Besidesfair value measurements (including fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities at acquisition dates) as discussed in the headquarters office in Novato, CA, the Bank operates ten branches in Marin County, three in Napa County, one in San Francisco, six in Sonoma CountyNotes herein.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and three in Alameda County. Our accounting and reporting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles, general practice, and regulatory guidance within the banking industry. A summary of our significant policies follows.

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents - include cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and other short-term investments with maturitymaturities of less than three months at the time of origination.purchase. Restricted cash includes balances not immediately available for business operations such as Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco reserve requirements and cash pledged for interest rate swap contracts and local agency deposits.


57


Investment Securities - are classified as "held-to-maturity," "trading securities" or "available-for-sale." Investments classified as held-to-maturity are those that we have the ability and intent to hold until maturity and are reported at cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. Investments held for resale in anticipation of short-term market movements are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Investments that are neither held-to-maturity nor trading are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities, net of related tax,taxes, are reported as a separate component of comprehensive (loss) income and included in stockholders' equity until realized. For discussion of our methodology in determining fair value, see Note 9, Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.


Purchase premiums and discounts on investment securities are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. For certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium, we amortize the premium to the earliest call date.

Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are included in non-interest income. The specific identification method is used to calculate realized gains and losses on sales of securities.

Securities transferred from the available-for-sale category to the held-to-maturity category are recorded at fair value at the date of transfer. Unrealized holding gains or losses associated withon the dates of the transfer of securities from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity are included in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), net of tax, in the consolidated balance sheets. These unrealized holding gains or losses on the dates of transfer are amortized over the remaining life of the securitysecurities as a yield adjustmentadjustments in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security.


At each financial statementAllowance for Credit Losses on Investment Securities - The allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities is a contra-asset valuation account determined in accordance with ASC 326, which is deducted from the securities' amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date as a result of management's assessment of the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance is measured on a pooled basis for securities with similar risk characteristics using historical credit loss information, adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Securities that are determined to be uncollectible are written off against the allowance.

For available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position ("impaired security"), we assess whether declines in1) we intend to sell the security, or, 2) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Under either of these conditions, the security's amortized cost is written down to fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-salethrough a charge to previously recognized allowances or earnings, as applicable. For impaired securities below their costs are deemedthat do not meet these conditions, we assess whether the decline in fair value was due to be other-than-temporary. We consider,credit loss or other factors. This assessment considers, among other things, (i) the length of time andthings: 1) the extent to which the fair value has beenis less than amortized cost, (ii)2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, 3) any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and (iii)4) our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Evidence evaluated includes, but is not limited to,If the remaining payment terms of the instrument and economic factors that are relevant to the collectability of the instrument, such as: current prepayment speeds, the current financial condition of the issuer(s), industry analyst reports, credit ratings, credit default rates, interest rate trends, the quality of any credit enhancement and thepresent value of any underlying collateral.

For each security in an unrealized loss position ("impaired security"), we assess whether we intend to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If we intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its


amortized cost basis, the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date is recognized against earnings.

For impaired securities that are not intended for sale and will not be required to be sold prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis, we determine if the impairment has a credit loss component. For both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities, if the amount of cash flows expected to be collected areis less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to have occurred andallowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss componentcomponent. Any impairment due to non-credit-related factors that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized against earnings as the difference between present value of the expected future cash flows and the amortized cost. Inin other comprehensive (loss) income. The discount rate used in determining the present value of the expected cash flows we discount the expected cash flows atis based on the effective interest rate implicit in the security at the date of purchase. The remaining difference between

Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the amortized costs and fair valuevalues of both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities and included in interest receivable and other assets on the amortized basisconsolidated statements of condition. Investment securities are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest is deemed to becontractually past due to factors that aremore than ninety days, or management does not credit relatedexpect full payment of principal and is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.

For held-to-maturity securities, if there is no credit loss component, no impairment is recognized. The portion of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive incomeinterest. We do not record an allowance for credit impaired debt securities classified as held-to-maturity is accreted from other comprehensive income to the amortized cost of the debt security over the remaining life of the debt security in a prospective manner on the basis of the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the effectivelosses for accrued interest method. In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The amendments in this ASU shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium and require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. We early adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017, which did not have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities and credit losses related to other-than-temporary impairment on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are included in non-interest income as gains (losses) on investment securities, net. The specific identification methodas the amounts are written-off when the investment is used to calculate realized gains and lossesplaced on salesnon-accrual status. There were no non-accrual investment securities in any of securities.the years presented in the consolidated financial statements.


Originated Loans- are reported at amortized cost, which is the principal amount outstanding net of deferred fees (costs), purchase premiums (discounts) and net charge-offs (recoveries). Amortized cost excludes accrued interest,
58


which is reflected in interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated statements of condition. We do not measure an allowance for loancredit losses (“ALLL”).on accrued interest receivable balances because these balances are written off in a timely manner as a reduction to interest income when loans are placed on non-accrual status as discussed below. Interest income is accrued daily using the simple interest method. Fees collected upon loan origination and certain direct costs of originating loans are deferred and recognized over the contractual lives of the related loans as yield adjustments using the interest method or straight-line method, as applicable. Upon prepayment or other disposition of the underlying loans before their contractual maturities, any associated unearned fees or unamortized costs are recognized.

Acquired Loans - ASC 326 modified the accounting for purchased loans and requires that an allowance for credit losses be established at the date of acquisition. However, for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”) that are measured at amortized cost, the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price rather than reported as a provision for credit losses. Subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses on PCD assets are recognized through the provision for credit losses.

Past-Due and Non-Accrual Loan Policy - A loan is considered past due when a payment has not been received by the contractual due date. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when Managementmanagement believes that there is substantial doubt as to the collection of principal or interest, generally when they become contractually past due by ninety90 days or more with respect to principal or interest, except for loans that are well-secured and in the process of collection. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, any accrued but uncollected interest is reversed from current-period interest income. Non-accrualincome and the amortization of deferred loan origination fees and costs is suspended. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the ultimate collectability of principal. We may be returnedreturn non-accrual loans to accrual status when one of the following occurs:


The borrower has resumed paying the full amount of the principal and interest and we are satisfied with the borrower's financial position. In order to meet this test, we must have received repayment of all past due principal and interest, unless the amounts contractually due are reasonably assured of repayment within a reasonable period of time, and there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally, six consecutive monthly payments), according to the original contractual terms or modified terms for loans whose contractual terms have been restructured in a manner which grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties (“troubled debt restructuring”).
The loan has become well secured and is in the process of collection.


Loan origination fees and commitment fees, offset by certain direct loan origination costs, are deferred and amortized as yield adjustments over the contractual lives of the related loans.

Loan Charge-Off Policy:Policy - For all loan types excluding overdraft accounts, we generally make a charge-off determination at or before 90 days past due. A collateral-dependent loan is partially charged down to the fair value of collateral securing it if: (1) it is deemed uncollectable, oruncollectable, or (2) it has been classified as a loss by either our internal loan review


process or external examiners. A non-collateral-dependent loan is partially charged down to its net realizable value under the same circumstances. Overdraft accounts are generally charged off when they exceed 60 days past due.


AcquiredTroubled Debt Restructured Loans: Acquired - Our loan portfolio includes certain loans are recorded at their estimated fair values at acquisition datemodified in accordance with Accounting Standards Code ("ASC"a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) 805, Business Combinations, factoringwhere we have granted economic concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and may include reductions in credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded for acquired loans as of the acquisition date.

We estimated the fair value of acquired loans at the acquisition date based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, risk classification, fixed or variable interest rate, termpayment extensions, forgiveness of loan, whetherprincipal, forbearance or not the loan was amortizing, and current discount rates. Loans, except for purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans, were grouped together according to similar risk characteristics and treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. Expected cash flows incorporated our best estimate of key assumptions at the time, such as property values, default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds. Discount rates were basedother actions. TDRs on market rates for new originations of comparable loans, where available, and included adjustments for liquidity factors. To the extent comparable market rates were not readily available, a discount rate was derived based on the assumptions of market participants' cost of funds, servicing costs and return requirements for comparable risk assets. In either case, the discount rate did not include a factor for credit losses, as that had been considered in estimating the cash flows. The process of calculating fair values of acquired loans, including estimates of losses expected to be incurred over the estimated remaining lives of the loans at acquisition date and ongoing updates to Management's expectation of future cash flows, requires significant subjective judgments and assumptions. The economic environment and lack of market liquidity and transparency are factors that have influenced, and may continue to affect, these assumptions and estimates.

We acquired loans with evidence of significant credit quality deterioration subsequent to their origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that we would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. Management applied significant subjective judgment in determining which loans were PCI loans. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include data such as past due and nonaccrualnon-accrual status risk grades and charge-off history.

The difference between the undiscounted expected cash flows expected to be collected and the fair value at acquisition date ("accretable difference") is accreted into interest income at a level yield of return over the estimated remaining life of the PCI loan, provided that the timing and amount of future cash flows is reasonably estimable. The accretable yield is affected by:
Changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans – Expected future cash flows are based on the variable rates in effect at the time of restructure may be returned to accruing status after management considers the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months, and obtains reasonable assurance of repayment and performance. Additionally, we may remove a loan from TDR designation if it meets all of the following conditions:
The loan is subsequently refinanced or restructured at current market interest rates and the new terms are consistent with the treatment of creditworthy borrowers under regular evaluationsunderwriting standards;
The borrower is no longer considered to be in financial difficulty;
Performance on the loan is reasonably assured; and
Existing loan did not have any forgiveness of cash flowsprincipal or interest.

59


Section 4013 of the 2020 CARES Act, subsequently amended by section 541 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act of 2020 ("Economic Aid Act"), provided optional, temporary relief from evaluating loans that may have been considered TDRs under GAAP. This relief applies to loan modifications executed between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency is terminated or January 1, 2022. The Bank elected to apply these temporary accounting provisions to payment relief loans beginning in March 2020. Accordingly, modifications that met certain criteria of the CARES Act were not categorized as troubled debt restructurings during 2021 and 2020. There were no loans remaining under this payment relief program as of December 31, 2022.

Collateral Dependent Loans - A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be collected;
Changes in prepayment assumptions – Prepayments affectprovided substantially through the estimated lifesale or operation of the collateral. For collateral dependent loans, including those for which may change the amount of interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected; and
Changes in the expected principal and interest payments over the estimated life – Updates to expected cash flows are driven by the credit outlook and actions taken with borrowers. Changes in expected future cash flows frommanagement determines foreclosure is probable, each loan modifications are included in the regular evaluations of cash flows expected to be collected.
The cash flows expected to be collected are updated each quarter based on current assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, and other factors that are reflective of current financial conditions of the borrowersis individually evaluated and the market conditions. Probable decreases in expected cash flows after acquisition result in impairment recorded as a specific allowance for loancredit losses or a charge-off to the allowance. Impairment is calculated as the present value of the expected future cash flows on the PCI loan, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate implicit in the loan.

The nonaccretable difference on the date of acquisition is defined as the difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected, considering the result of prepayments, and is not recorded.

For purposes of accounting for the PCI loans from past business combinations, we elected not to apply the pooling method but to account for these loans individually. Disposals of loans, which may include sales of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in full by the borrower, or foreclosure of the collateral, result in removal of the loan from the PCI


loan portfolio at its carrying amount. If a PCI loan pays off earlier than expected, a gain is recorded as interest income when the payoff amount exceeds the recorded investment.

For acquired loans not considered credit impaired ("non-PCI"), we recognize the entire fair value discount accretion to interest income, based on contractual cash flows using an effective interest rate method for term loans, and on a straight line basis for revolving lines. When a non-PCI loan is placed on non-accrual status subsequent to acquisition, accretion stops until the loan is returned to accrual status. The level of accretion on non-PCI loans varies from period to period due to maturities and early pay-offs of these loans during the reporting periods. Subsequent to acquisition, if the probable and estimable losses for non-PCI loans exceed the amount of the remaining unaccreted discount, the excess is established as an allowance for loan losses.

For further information regarding our acquired loans, see Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.

Allowance for Loan Lossesis based upon estimates of loan losses and is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by provisions for loan losses charged against earnings and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries.

In periodic evaluations of the adequacy of the allowance balance, Management considers current economic conditions, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, our past loan loss experience and other factors. The ALLL is based on estimates, and ultimate losses may vary from current estimates. Our Board of Directors' Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) reviews the adequacy of the ALLL at least quarterly.

The overall allowance consists of 1) specific allowances for individually identified impaired loans ("ASC 310-10") and 2) general allowances for pools of loans ("ASC 450-20"), which incorporate quantitative (e.g., historical loan loss rates) and qualitative risk factors (e.g., portfolio growth and trends, credit concentrations, economic and regulatory factors, etc.).

The first component, specific allowances, results from the analysis of identified problem credits and the evaluation of sources of repayment including collateral, as applicable. Through Management's ongoing loan grading and credit monitoring process, individual loans are identified that have conditions indicating the borrower may be unable to pay all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms. These loans are evaluated for impairment individually by Management. Management considers an originated loan to be impaired when it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When the fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the difference is recorded as an impairment through the establishment of a specific allowance. For loans determined to be impaired, the extent of the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate at origination (for originated loans), based on the loan's observable market price, or based on the fair value of the collateral, ifadjusted for estimated selling costs when repayment is expected from the loan issale of the collateral, dependent or if foreclosure is imminent.less the loan's amortized cost. In determining the fair value, management considers such information as the appraised value of the collateral, observed and potential future changes in collateral value, and historical loss experience for loans that were secured by similar collateral. Generally, with problem credits that are collateral dependent, we obtain appraisals of the collateral at least annually. We may obtain appraisals more frequently if we believe the collateral value is subject to market volatility, if a specific event has occurred toaffected the collateral, or if we believe foreclosure is imminent.


Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans ("ACL") - is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date to present the net amount of loans expected to be collected. Amortized cost does not include accrued interest, which management elected to exclude from the estimate of expected credit losses (refer to the Past-Due and Non-Accrual Loan Policy section above). Management estimates the allowance quarterly using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses.

The second component is an estimate ofACL model utilizes a discounted cash flow ("DCF") method to measure the probable inherentexpected credit losses in eachon loans collectively evaluated that are sub-segmented by loan poolpools with similar characteristics. This analysis encompasses the entire loan portfolio, excluding individually identified impaired loans and acquired loans whose purchase discount has not been fully accreted. Under our allowance model, loanscredit risk characteristics, which are evaluated on a pool basis bygenerally comprised of federal regulatory reporting codes ("CALL codes" or "segments")(i.e., which are further delineated by assigned credit risk ratings, as described in Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses. SegmentsCall codes). Pooled segments include the following:


Loans secured by real estate:
-     1-4 family residential construction loans
-     Other construction loans and all land development and other land loans
-     Secured by farmland (including residential and other improvements)
-     Revolving, open-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties and extended under lines
of credit
-     Closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties, secured by first liens
-     Closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties, secured by junior liens
-     Secured by multifamily (5 or more) residential properties


-     LoansCommercial real estate loans secured by owner-occupied non-farm nonresidential properties
-     LoansCommercial real estate loans secured by other non-farm nonresidential properties
Loans to finance agricultural production and other loans to farmers
Commercial and industrial loans
Loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures (i.e., consumer loans)
Municipal entities
Non-profit organizations
Other loans (overdraft credit lines)


The DCF method incorporates assumptions for probability of default ("PD"), loss given default ("LGD"), and prepayments and curtailments over the contractual terms of the loans. Under the DCF method, the ACL reflects the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows using the loan's effective rate. We elected to report the change in present values from one reporting period to the next due to the passage of time and changes in the estimate of future expected cash flows through the provision for credit losses, rather than though interest income.

60


In determining the PD for each pooled segment, the Bank utilized regression analyses to identify certain economic drivers that were considered highly correlated to historical Bank or peer loan default experience. As a result, management chose the California unemployment rate as the primary economic forecast driver for all segments, except for municipal loans. In addition, the annual percentage change in the California gross domestic product was used in the commercial and industrial loan segment. For municipal loans, the ACL model determines general allowances by loanutilized a constant default rate obtained from a nationally recognized default rate study, which is updated annually. A third party provides LGD estimates for each segment based on a banking industry Frye-Jacobs Risk Index approach. The ACL model incorporates a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast of economic factors, updated quarterly, which is based on Moody's Analytics' Baseline Forecast. For periods beyond the forecast horizon, the economic factors revert to historical averages on a straight-line basis over a one-year period.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments and curtailments, when appropriate. The pooled loans' contractual loan terms exclude extensions, renewals, and modifications unless one or more of the following applies: 1) management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower, 2) the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract, or 3) an existing troubled debt restructuring is within six months of maturity.

Loans that do not share the same risk characteristics as pooled loans are evaluated individually for credit loss and generally include all non-accrual loans, collateral dependent loans, and certain troubled debt restructured loans and loans graded substandard or worse as determined by management.

Management considers whether adjustments to the quantitative (loss history)portion of the ACL are needed for differences in segment-specific risk characteristics or to reflect the extent to which it expects current conditions and qualitative risk factors. reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions to differ from the conditions that existed during the historical period included in the development of PD and LGD. Qualitative internal and external risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio.portfolio
Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accruals loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans.loans
The existence and effect of individual loan and loan segment concentrations.concentrations
Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere.elsewhere
Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff.staff
Changes in the quality of our systematic loan review processes.processes
Changes in economic and business conditions, and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio.portfolio
Changes in the value of underlying collateral, where applicable.applicable
The effect of other external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the portfolio.portfolio
The effect of acquisitions of other loan portfolios on our infrastructure, including risk associated with entering new geographic areas as a result of such acquisitions.acquisitions
The presence of specialized lending segments in the portfolio.portfolio


Beginning withThere were no material changes to the quarter ended March 31, 2016, Management enhanced itsACL methodology for determiningduring 2022. However, changes in assumptions that influenced management's current estimate of the quantitative and qualitative risk factors assigned to unimpaired loans in order to capture historical loss information at the loan level, track loss migration through risk grade deterioration, increase efficienciesexpected credit losses were primarily related to performing the calculations, a decrease in applicable loan portfolio balances and refine how we incorporate environmental and other unique risk elements into our estimation of credit losses. The changes in methodology did not result in a material difference in general allowances. Prior to March 31, 2016, under the Bank's allowance model, each segment was assigned a quantitative loss factor that was primarily based on a rolling twenty-quarter look-back at our historical losses for that particular segment, as well as a number of other assumptions. Under the current methodology, the quantitative risk factor for each segment utilizes the greater of either the historical loss method or migration analysis loss method based on loss history beginning March 2010.

Under the historical loss method, quarterly loss rates are calculated for each segment by dividing annualized net charge-offs during each quarter by the quarter's average segment balances. The quarterly loss rates are averaged over the entire loss history period. Under the migration analysis method, loss rates are calculated at the risk grade and segment levels by dividing the net charge-off amount by the total segment balance at the beginning of each migration period where the charged-off loan in question was present. Migration loss rates are averaged for each risk grade and segment for the entire loss history period. For each segment, the loss rates that resultimprovements in the largerMoody's Analytics' Baseline Forecast of California unemployment rates since December 31, 2021, which decreased the migration loss reserves or segment historical loss reserves are appliedquantitative "modeled" allowance for credit losses. These decreases were partially offset by adjustments to the current loan balances. Qualitative factors are combined with these quantitative factors at the segment level to arrive at the overall general allowances.

We establish specific allowancesqualitative economic risk factor to account for creditthe ongoing deterioration for probable decreases in cash flows for PCI loans subsequent to acquisition. The estimated cash flows expected to be collected on PCI loans is updated quarterly and requires the use of key assumptions and estimates based on factors such as the current economic environment, changes in collateral values, loan workout plans, changes in the probabilityeconomic outlook that management believes is not captured in the quantitative portion of default, loss severities, and prepayments. Probable decreases in expected cash flows after acquisition result in impairment recorded as a specific allowance for loan losses or a charge-off to the allowance. Impairment is calculated as the present value of the expected future cash flows on the PCI loan, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate implicit in the loan.

While we believe we use the best information available to determine the allowance for loancredit losses, our results of operations could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance. A decline in local and national economic conditions, or significantOur ACL model is sensitive to changes in unemployment rate forecasts and certain other assumptions that could result in a material increasefluctuations in the allowance for loancredit losses and may adversely affect our financial condition and results


of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of their routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional allowance for loan losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.


For further information regarding the allowance for loan losses, see Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.

61


Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance SheetUnfunded Loan Commitments:- We make commitments to extend credit to meet the financing needs of our customers in the form of loans or standby letters of credit. We are exposed to credit losslosses over a loan's contractual period in the event that a decline in credit quality of the borrower leads to nonperformance. We record an allowance for losses on these off-balanceunfunded loan commitments at the balance sheet commitmentsdate based on estimates of probability that these commitments will be drawn upon according to our historical utilization experience onof different types of commitments and expected loss severity. Thisseverity and loss rates determined for pooled funded loans. The allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments is a liability account included in interest payable and other liabilities on the consolidated statements of condition. Adjustments to the allowance for unfunded commitments are included in non-interest expense as a provision for (or reversal of) the allowance for unfunded commitments.


Transfers of Financial Assets: - We have entered into certain loan participation agreements with other organizations. We account for these transfers of financial assets as sales when control over the transferred financial assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1)1) the assets and liabilities have been isolated from us, (2)2) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets (or beneficial interests) it received, free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right, beyond a trivial benefit and (3)3) we do not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets or third-party beneficial interests related to those transferred assets. No gainTransfers of a portion of a loan must meet the criteria of a participating interest. If it does not meet the criteria of a participating interest, the transfer must be accounted for as a secured borrowing. In order to meet the criteria for a participating interest, all cash flows from the loan must be divided proportionately, the rights of each loan holder must have the same priority, and the loan holders must have no recourse to the transferor other than standard representations and warranties and no loan holder has the right to pledge or loss has beenexchange the entire loan. We recognized by usno gains or losses on the sale of these participation interests in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020.


Premises and Equipment: Premises - Land is carried at cost and equipment consist ofnot depreciated. Bank-owned buildings, leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures, software and equipment and are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, and amortization, which are calculateddepreciated/amortized on a straight-line basis. Furniture andand fixtures are depreciated over eight years and equipment is generally depreciated over three to twenty years. LeaseholdBank-owned buildings are depreciated over twenty-five to thirty years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the leases. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred.


Leases - We lease certain premises under long-term non-cancelable operating leases, most of which include escalation clauses and one or more options to extend the lease term, and some of which contain lease termination clauses. Only those renewal and termination options that management determines are reasonably certain of exercising are included in the calculation of the lease liability. In addition, we lease certain equipment under finance leases. The equipment finance lease terms do not contain renewal options, bargain purchase options or residual value guarantees. We did not have any significant short-term leases during the reported periods.

Lease right-of-use assets represent the right to use the underlying asset while lease liabilities represent the present value of future lease obligations. We elected not to separate non-lease components from lease components and to exclude short-term leases (i.e., lease term of 12 months or less at the commencement date) from right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all lease classifications. When calculating the lease liability, because most lease contracts do not contain an implicit interest rate, we discount lease payments over a lease's expected term based on the collateralized Federal Home Loan Bank borrowing rate that was commensurate with lease terms and minimum payments at the lease commencement date. Right-of-use assets for operating leases are amortized over the lease term by amounts that represent the difference between periodic straight-line lease expense and periodic interest accretion on the related liability to make lease payments, whereas finance leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Expense recognition for operating leases is recorded on a straight-line basis while expense recognition for finance leases represents the sum of periodic amortization of the associated right-of-use asset and the interest accretion on the lease liability. Refer to Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information.

Business Combinations: - Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. A business is defined as a set of activities and assets that is
62


both self-sustaining and managed to provide a return to investors and generally has three elements: inputs, processes and outputs. Under the acquisition method, the acquiring entity in a business combination recognizes the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. To the extent the fair value of net assets acquired, including other identifiable assets, exceed the purchase price, a bargain purchase gain is recognized. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from contingencies must also bea business combination are recognized at fair value, if the fair value can be determined during the measurement period.value. Results of operations of an acquired business are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition. Acquisition-relatedBusiness acquisition-related costs, including conversion and restructuring charges, are expensed as incurred. If substantially all of an acquisition is made up of one asset or several similar assets, or without a substantive process that together contributes to the ability to create outputs, the acquisition is accounted for as an asset acquisition and acquisition costs will be capitalized as part of the assets acquired, rather than expensed in a business combinations.


Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: - Goodwill is determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill that arises from a business combination is periodically evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level, at least annually. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Core deposit intangible ("CDI") represents the estimated future benefit of deposits related to an acquisition and is booked separately from the related deposits and evaluated periodically for impairment. The CDI asset is amortized on an accelerated method over its estimated useful life of ten years. At December 31, 2017,2022, the future estimated amortization expense for the CDI arising from our past acquisitions is as follows:
(in thousands)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Core deposit intangible amortization$1,350 $975 $875 $773 $634 $509 $5,116 
(in thousands)2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Core deposit intangible amortization$921
$887
$853
$818
$782
$2,231
$6,492


We make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit where goodwill is assigned is less than its carrying amount. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying amount, no impairment is recorded. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an interim basis if circumstances change or an event occurs between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value


of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. The qualitative assessment includes adverse events or circumstances identified that could negatively affect the reporting units’ fair value as well as positive and mitigating events. Such indicators may include, among others, a significant changechanges in legal factors or in the general business climate, significant changechanges in our stock price and market capitalization, unanticipated competition, and an action or assessment by a regulator. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value is recognized. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We recorded no impairment adjustments to either the CDI or goodwill in 2022, 2021 and 2020.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We early adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017, which did not have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO"): - OREO is comprised of property acquired through a business combination, foreclosure, in substance repossession or acceptance of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure when the related loan receivable is de-recognized. OREO is recorded at fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis, and subsequently accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any shortfall of collateral value from the recorded investment of the related loan is recognized as loss at the time of foreclosure and is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Fair value of collateral is generally based on an independent appraisal of the property. Revenues and expenses associated with OREO, and subsequent adjustments to the fair value of the property and to the estimated costs of disposal, are realized and reported as a component of non-interest income and expense when incurred. We recorded a $345 thousand valuation adjustment to OREO in 2022.


Bank Owned Life Insurance ("BOLI"): - The Bank owns life insurance policies on certain key current and former officers. BOLI is recorded in interest receivable and other assets on the consolidated statements of condition at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the period end,period-end, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement.


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco ("FHLB") Stock: - The Bank is a member of the FHLB. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors. OurAs of December 31,
63


2022 and 2021 our investment in FHLB stock iswas carried at cost, andas there was no impairment or changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. We periodically evaluate FHLB stock for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. FHLB stock is included as part of interest receivable and other assets on the consolidated statements of condition. We periodically evaluate FHLB stock for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as non-interest income.


Investments in Low Income Housing Tax Credit Funds: - We have invested in limited partnerships that were formed to develop and operate affordable housing projects for low or moderate-income tenants throughout California. Our ownership percentage in each limited partnership is less than two percent. ranges from 1.0% to 3.5%. We account for the investments in qualified affordable housing tax credit funds using the proportional amortization method, where the initial cost of the investment is amortized in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. Low income housing tax credits and other tax benefits received, andnet of the netamortization of the investment performance is recognized as part of income tax expense (benefit).benefit. Each of the partnerships must meet the regulatory minimum requirements for affordable housing for a minimumminimum 15-year compliance period toto fully utilize the tax credits. If the partnerships cease to qualify during the compliance period, the credit may be denied for any period in which the project is not in compliance and a portion of the credit previously taken is subject to recapture with interest. We record an impairment charge if the value of the future tax credits and other tax benefits is less than the carrying value of the investments.


Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”): - We recognize compensation cost of thefor ESOP contributioncontributions when funds become committed for the purchase of Bancorp's common shares into the ESOP in the year in which the employees render service entitling them to the contribution. If we contribute stock, the compensation cost is the fair value of the shares when they are committed to be released (i.e., when the number of shares becomes known and formally approved). In 2017, the Bank2022, 2021 and 2020, Bancorp only made only stock contributions to the ESOP. In 2016 and 2015, the Bank made only cash contributions to the ESOP without leveraging.


Income Taxes: - Income taxes reported in the consolidated financial statements are computed based on an asset and liability approach. We recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and we record deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in


which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent it is more likely than not that they will be realized. In evaluating our ability to recover the deferred tax assets and the need to establish a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets, Managementmanagement considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. In projecting future taxable income, Managementmanagement develops assumptions including the amount of future state and federal pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates being used to manage the underlying business. Bancorp files consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns.


We recognize the financial statement effect of a tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits and all available evidence, that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution through protests, appeals or litigation processes. For tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-notmore likely than not threshold, we measure and record the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The remainder of the benefits associated with tax positions taken is recorded as unrecognized tax benefits, along with any related interest and penalties. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in tax expense.


In deciding whether or not our tax positions taken meet the more-likely-than-notmore likely than not recognition threshold, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of inherently complex state and federal tax laws. To the extent tax authorities disagree with tax positions taken by us, our effective tax rates could be materially affected in the period of settlement with the taxing authorities. Revision of our estimate of accrued income taxes also may result from our own income tax planning, which may affect effective tax rates and results of operations for any reporting period.


We present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward, or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward, rather than as a liability, when (1) the uncertain tax
64


position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction and (2) we intend to and are able to use the deferred tax asset for that purpose. Otherwise, the unrecognized tax benefit is presented as a liability instead of being netted with deferred tax assets.


Earnings per share (“EPS”)- are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. The following table shows: 1) weighted average basic shares, 2) potentially dilutive weighted average common shares related to stock options and unvested restricted stock awards, and stock warrant, and 3) weighted average diluted shares. Basic EPS are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each annual period, excluding unvested restricted stock awards. Diluted EPS are calculated using the weighted average number of potentially dilutive common shares. The number of potentially dilutive common shares included in year-to-date diluted EPS is a year-to-date weighted average of potentially dilutive common shares included in each quarterly diluted EPS computation. In computing diluted EPS, we exclude anti-dilutive shares such as options whose exercise prices exceed the current common stock price, as they would not reduce EPS under the treasury method. We have two forms of our outstanding common stock: common stock and unvested restricted stock awards. Holders of unvested restricted stock awards receive non-forfeitable dividends at the same rate as common shareholders and they both share equally in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, the difference in EPS is nominal for these participating securities.
(in thousands, except per share data)202220212020
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding15,921 14,340 13,525 
Potentially dilutive common shares related to:
Stock options31 62 69 
Unvested restricted stock awards17 20 23 
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding15,969 14,422 13,617 
Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Basic EPS$2.93 $2.32 $2.24 
Diluted EPS$2.92 $2.30 $2.22 
Weighted average anti-dilutive common shares not included in the calculation of diluted EPS211 97 148 
(in thousands, except per share data)2017
2016
2015
Weighted average basic shares outstanding6,196
6,073
5,966
Potentially dilutive common shares related to:   
Stock options62
34
41
Unvested restricted stock awards15
8
5
Warrant

53
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding6,273
6,115
6,065
Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Basic EPS$2.58
$3.81
$3.09
Diluted EPS$2.55
$3.78
$3.04
Weighted average anti-dilutive shares not included in the calculation of diluted EPS21
64
36




Share-Based Compensation: - All share-based payments, including stock options and restricted stock, are recognized as stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income based on the grant-date fair value of the award with a corresponding increase in common stock. The grant-date fair value of the award is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The stock-based compensation expense excludes stock grants to directors as compensation for their services, which are recognized as director expenses separately based on the grant-date value of the stock. We account for forfeitures as they occur. See Note 8, Stockholders' Equity and Stock Option Plans, for further discussion.


We determine the fair value of stock options at the grant date using a Black-Scholes pricing model that takes into account the stock price at the grant date, the exercise price, the expected life of the option, the volatility of the underlying stock, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the common stock over the most recent period that is generally commensurate with the expected life of the options. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions used represent Management'smanagement's best estimates based on historical information, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of Management'smanagement's judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, the recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from that recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value of restricted stock is based on the stock price on the grant date.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). This ASU identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, forfeiture accounting, and classifications on the statement of cash flows. We adopted the requirements of this ASU effective January 1, 2017, which impacted the following areas:

Forfeiture rates: We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. Previously, we accounted for forfeitures based on an estimate of the number of awards expected to vest. The policy change was applied using a modified retrospective approach and did not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Income taxes: We have recordedrecord excess tax benefits (deficiencies) resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options, the disqualifying disposition of incentive stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards as tax benefits (expense) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income with a corresponding decrease (increase) to current taxes payable. Prior to the adoption of this ASU, excess tax benefits (deficiencies) were recognized as an increase (decrease) to common stock in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity. In addition, we have reflectedreflect excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Prior to the adoption of this ASU, excess tax benefits were reflected as a financing activity. We applied the amendment prospectively and did not reclassify cash flows from operating and financing activities in the prior period consolidated financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $214 thousand in excess tax benefits recorded as a reduction to income tax expense.

65


Statutory tax withholding:
Cash paid for tax withholdings when shares are surrendered in a cashless stock option exchange has beenis classified as a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows. There were no shares surrendered for tax withholdings prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09.


Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities - Fair Value Hedges: - All of our interest rate swap contracts are designated and qualified as fair value hedges. The terms of our interest rate swap contracts are closely aligned to the terms of the designated fixed-rate loans. The hedging relationships are tested for effectiveness on a quarterly basis.basis using a qualitative approach. The qualitative analysis includes verification that there are no changes to the derivative's or hedged item's key terms and conditions and no adverse developments regarding risk of counterparty default, and validation that we continue to have fair value hedge designation. The interest rate swaps are carried on the consolidated statements of condition at their fair value in other assets (when the fair value is positive) or in other liabilities (when the fair value is negative). The changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded in interest income. The unrealized gains or losses due to changes in fair value of the hedged fixed-rate loans due to changes in benchmark interest rates are recorded as an adjustment to the hedged loans and offset in interest income. For derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement, we do not offset fair value amounts of interest rate swaps in liability positions with the ones in asset positions.




From time to time, we make firm commitments to enter into long-term fixed-rate loans with borrowers backed by yield maintenance agreements and simultaneously enter into forward interest rate swap agreements with correspondent banks to mitigate the change in fair value of the yield maintenance agreement. Prior to loan funding, yield maintenance agreements with net settlement features that meet the definition of a derivative are considered as non-designated hedges and are carried on the consolidated statements of condition at their fair value in other assets (when the fair value is positive) or in other liabilities (when the fair value is negative). The offsetting changes in the fair value of the forward swap and the yield maintenance agreement are recorded in interest income. When the fixed-rate loans are originated, the forward swaps are designated to offset the change in fair value in the loans. Subsequent to the point of the swap designations, the fair value of the related yield maintenance agreements at the designation date that was recorded in other assets and is amortized using the effective yield method over the life of the respective designated loans.


The net effect of the change in fair value of interest rate swaps, the amortization of the yield maintenance agreement and the change in the fair value of the hedged loans due to changes in benchmark interest rates result in an insignificant amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in interest income. For further detail, see Note 14, Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities.


Revenue Recognition - We utilize the following five-step model for non-financial instrument related revenue that is in scope for ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and, 5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation. Our main revenue streams in scope for ASC 606 include:

Wealth Management and Trust Services ("WMTS") fees - WMTS services include, but are not limited to: customized investment advisory and management; administrative services such as bill pay and tax reporting; trust administration, estate settlement, custody and fiduciary services.  Performance obligations for investment advisory and management services are generally satisfied over time.  Revenue is recognized monthly according to a tiered fee schedule based on the client's month-end market value of assets under our management.  WMTS does not earn revenue based on performance or incentives.  Costs associated with WMTS revenue-generating activities, such as payments to sub-advisors, are recorded separately as part of professional service expenses when incurred.

Deposit account service charges - Service charges on deposit accounts consist of monthly maintenance fees, business account analysis fees, business online banking fees, check order charges, and other deposit account-related fees.  Performance obligations for monthly maintenance fees and account analysis fees are satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, when we complete our performance obligation each month.  Performance obligations related to transaction-based services (such as check orders) are satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, at a point in time typically when the transaction is completed, except for
66


business accounts subject to analysis where the transaction-based fees are part of the monthly account analysis fees.

Debit card interchange fees - We issue debit cards to our consumer and small business customers that allow them to purchase goods and services from merchants in person, online, or via mobile devices using funds held in their demand deposit accounts held with us.  Debit cards issued to our customers are part of global electronic payment networks (such as Visa) who pass a portion of the merchant interchange fees to debit card-issuing member banks like us when our customers make purchases through their networks.  Performance obligations for debit card services are satisfied and revenue is recognized daily as the payment networks process transactions.  Because we act in an agent capacity, we recognize network costs on a net basis with interchange fees in non-interest income.

Advertising Costs - are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2022, 2021, and 2015,2020, advertising costs totaled $567$1.1 million, $908 thousand,, $565 and $769 thousand,, and $334 thousand, respectively.


Comprehensive (Loss) Income - includes net income, changes in the unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investment securities, and amortization of net unrealized gains or losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity, net of related taxes, reported on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income and as components of stockholders' equity.


Fair Value Measurements: - We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. We base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.date (i.e., exit price notion) reflecting factors such as a liquidity premium. Securities available-for-sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Our equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values are recorded at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. FHLB stock and Visa Inc. Class B common stock are carried at cost as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as there was no impairment or changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as purchased loans and acquired deposits recorded at acquisition date, certain impaired loans, other real estate owned and securities held-to-maturity that are other-than-temporarily impaired. These non-recurring fair value adjustments typically involve write-downs of individual assets due to application of lower-of-cost or market accounting.


When we develop our fair value measurement process, we maximize the use of observable inputs. Whenever there is no readily available market data, we use our best estimates and assumptions in determining fair value, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of Management'smanagement's judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded earnings or disclosures could have been materially different from those reflected in these consolidated financial statements.


For detailed information on our use of fair value measurements and our related valuation methodologies, see Note 9, Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the consolidated financial statements include ALLL, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, accrued liabilities, accounting for income taxes and fair value measurements (including fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities at acquisition dates) as discussed in the Notes herein.

Other Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting Standards


Other than the early adoption of a portion of ASU No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, as discussed below, we did not adopt any new or amended accounting standards in 2022.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective

In May 2014,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). The amendments in this ASU are elective and provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden of accounting for, or recognizing the effects of reference rate reform. The amendments in this ASU provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this ASU may be elected through December 31, 2024 (as amended by ASU No. 2022-06 discussed below). An entity may elect the amendments in this update at an interim period with adoption methods varying based on transaction type. We have not elected to apply amendments at this time and will assess the applicability of
67


this ASU to us as we continue to monitor guidance for reference rate reform from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU is a converged standard involving FASB and International Financial Reporting Standards that provides a single comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers across transactions and industries. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount and at a time that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be


entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Subsequent updates related to Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) are as follows:

August 2015 ASU No. 2015-14 - Deferral of the Effective Date, institutes a one-year deferral of the effective date of this amendment to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted only as of annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
March 2016 ASU No. 2016-08 - Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and on the use of indicators that assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer.
April 2016 ASU No. 2016-10 - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, provides guidance in determining performance obligations in a contract with a customer and clarifies whether a promise to grant a license provides a right to access or the right to use intellectual property.
May 2016 ASU No. 2016-12 - Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, gives further guidance on assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications at transition.
December 2016 ASU No. 2016-20 - Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, further clarifies specific aspects of previously issued guidance or corrects unintended application of the guidance.

Our revenue is mainly comprised of interest income on financial instruments, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09. We have identified applicable sources of non-interest income and are gathering and reviewing related contracts and evaluating their potential impact to our revenue recognition under the new standards. While the recognition of certain components of our non-interest income may be affected by the ASU, we do not expect it to have a materialits impact on our financial condition and results of operations.


In January 2016,2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). The main amendments in this ASU make improvementsare intended to accounting standards relatedclarify certain optional expedients and scope of derivative instruments. The amendments are elective and effective immediately upon issuance of this ASU. Amendments may be elected through December 31, 2024 (as amended by ASU No. 2022-06 discussed below). We have four interest rate swap contracts with notional values totaling $12.0 million indexed to LIBOR that will either be subject to the fall-back index rate stipulated by the ISDA protocol or modified to other reference rates such as Prime or SOFR as mutually agreed by our counterparty and us. We have not elected to apply the amendments at this time and will continue to assess the applicability of this ASU to us as we monitor guidance for reference rate reform from FASB and its impact on our financial instruments, includingcondition and results of operations.

In December 2022, the following:
Requires equity investments, except for those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidationFASB issued ASU No. 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the investee,Sunset Date of Topic 848. The objective of the guidance in Topic 848 was to provide temporary relief during the transition period, as noted in the discussion of ASU 2020-04 above, under which the sunset provision was based on an expectation that LIBOR would cease being published after December 31, 2021. In March 2021, the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") announced that the intended cessation date of certain tenors of USD LIBOR would be June 30, 2023, which is beyond the current sunset date of Topic 848. Therefore, this amendment deferred the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-08, Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (Topic 805). The amendments address diversity in accounting practices and require acquiring companies to apply ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers acquired in a business combination, as opposed to other methods such as fair value. The amendments improve comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination. The amendments are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However,applied prospectively to business combinations occurring on or after December 15, 2022 and early adoption is permitted. In the event of a future business combination, we will assess the impact of the ASU on our financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures. The amendment eliminates the recognition measurement guidance for troubled debt restructured ("TDR") loans, and instead requires an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identicalevaluate whether a modification represents a new loan or a similar investmentcontinuation of an existing loan in accordance with ASC Topic 310-20, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In addition, the same issuer.
Simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value.
Eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is currently required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheet.
Requires public companies to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes.
Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
Clarifiesamendment requires that an entity should evaluateinclude in its vintage disclosures the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity's other deferred tax assets.

ASU 2016-01 iscurrent period-gross loan charge-offs by year of origination. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU2022, and should be applied prospectively, except that an entity has the option to apply a modified retrospective method for TDR loans, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption. An entity may affect our financial statement presentationelect to early adopt each of the amendments separately. As such, we early adopted the current period charge-off disclosures in the first quarter of 2022 and intend to adopt the loan modification amendments when effective in the first quarter of 2023. Neither the early adoption of the amendments related footnotes, but we do not expect it to gross charge-off disclosures nor the future adoption of the TDR amendments had or will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.




In February 2016,March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases2022-01, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 842)815): Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method. Among other things, the ASU renames the "last-of-layer" method to the "portfolio layer" method and makes fair value hedging more accessible for hedge accounting of interest rate risk for portfolios and financial assets. For example, the guidance permits an entity to apply the same portfolio hedging method to both prepayable and non-prepayable financial assets, thereby providing for consistency between accounting for similar hedges. The amendments in this ASU intend to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing an asset, which represents the right to use the asset for the lease term, and a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments measured on a discounted basis. This ASU generally applies to leasing arrangements exceeding a twelve month term. ASU 2016-02 isare effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periodsyears beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. Early application2022. The adoption of the amendments is permitted. We intend to adopt this ASU during the first quarter of 2019, as required, and are continuing to evaluatewill not affect our lease agreements and potentialexisting hedge accounting, software solutions as they become available. As of December 31, 2017, our undiscounted operating lease obligations that were off-balance sheet totaled $18.8 million (See Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies). Upon adoption of this ASU, the present values of leases currently classified as operating leases will be recognized as lease assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Additional disclosures, of key information about our leasing arrangements will also be required. We do not expect that the ASU will have a material impact on our capital ratios or return on average assets when adopted and we are currently evaluating the effect that the ASU will have on other components of our financial condition andor results of operations.


In June 2016,2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 326)820): Fair Value Measurement of Credit LossesEquity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. The amendment reduces diversity in practice by clarifying that a separate contractual restriction on Financial Instruments. Under the new guidance, entities will be required to measure expected credit losses by utilizing forward-looking information to assesssale of an entity's allowance for credit losses. The measurementequity security is not considered part of expected credit losses will be based on historical experience, current conditionsthe unit of account of the equity security and, reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of a credit over its remaining life.therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. In addition, this ASU
68


provided amended examples to illustrate that a restriction that is a characteristic of the equity security, which market participants would take into account when pricing them, would be considered in measuring fair value. This ASU amends the accountingalso introduces new disclosure requirements. The amendments are effective prospectively for potential credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2023. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, includingboth interim periods within those fiscal years. We have formed an internal Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") committee and are working with our third party vendorannual financial statements. As discussed in Note 4, Investment Securities, we hold Visa Inc. Class B common stock that is legally restricted from resale to determinenon-member banks of Visa U.S.A. until the appropriate methodologies and resources to utilize in preparation for transition tocovered litigation against Visa Inc. is settled. While the new accounting standards.

In August 2016,adoption of the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU provides guidance on how to present and classify eight specific cash flow topics in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented, if practical. This ASU may affect our presentation of certain cash flows and their categorization as operating, investing or financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows, butrequire additional disclosures, we do not expectanticipate that it to have a materialwill impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments are intended to help companies evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses and provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments are effective for annual periods after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The amendments will be adopted prospectively. We will consider these amendments in our evaluation of the accounting for any future business acquisitions or asset disposals.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU applies to entities that change the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The FASB adopted this ASU to provide clarity in what constitutes a modification and to reduce diversity in practice in applying Topic 718. In order for a change to a share-based arrangement to not require Topic 718 modification accounting treatment, all of the following must be met: no change in fair value, no change in vesting conditions and no change in the balance sheet classification of the modified award. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. We do not expect this ASU to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This amendment changes both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. It is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies' risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase


transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance will be required prospectively. We expect this amendment to affect the presentation of our hedging activities, but we do not expect it to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.


In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This amendment helps organizations address certain stranded income tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) resulting from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The ASU requires financial statement preparers to disclose a description of the accounting policy for releasing income tax effects from AOCI, whether they elect to reclassify the stranded income tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and information about the other income tax effects that are reclassified. The amendments are effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is recognized. We are early adopting this ASU in the first quarter of 2018 by reclassifying $637 thousand from AOCI to retained earnings. This amount represents the stranded income tax effects related to the unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities in AOCI on the date of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Note 2:  Investment Securities
 
Our investment securities portfolio consists of U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, U.S. federal government agency securities, including mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”agencies such as Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”Small Business Administration ("SBA") issued or guaranteed by, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises ("GSEs"), such as Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), or Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), Small Business Administration ("SBA") backed securities, debentures issued by government-sponsored agencies such as FNMA, Federal Farm Credit Bureau,Banks Funding Corporation and FHLB, U.S. Corporations and FHLMC, as well as privatelyone asset-backed security collateralized by student loan pools. We also invest in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"/"CMBS") and collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs") issued CMOs,or guaranteed by the GSEs, as reflected in the table below:following table.

A summary of the amortized cost, fair value and allowance for credit losses related to securities held-to-maturity as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 is presented below.

Held-to-maturity:
Amortized Cost 1
Allowance for Credit LossesNet Carrying AmountGross UnrealizedFair Value
(in thousands)Gains(Losses)
December 31, 2022
Securities of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA$331,281 $— $331,281 $— $(50,147)$281,134 
CMOs issued by FHLMC235,971 — 235,971 59 (29,503)206,527 
CMOs issued by FNMA111,904 — 111,904 — (5,419)106,485 
CMOs issued by GNMA52,356 — 52,356 11 (3,076)49,291 
SBA-backed securities2,372 — 2,372 — (133)2,239 
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies145,823 145,823 — (26,467)119,356 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions62,500 — 62,500 — (10,741)51,759 
Corporate bonds30,000 — 30,000 — (1,552)28,448 
Total held-to-maturity$972,207 $— $972,207 $70 $(127,038)$845,239 
December 31, 2021
Securities of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA$126,990 $— $126,990 $2,110 $(712)$128,388 
  CMOs issued by FHLMC106,851 — 106,851 668 (1,045)106,474 
  CMOs issued by FNMA
4,866 — 4,866 128 — 4,994 
  SBA-backed securities4,840 — 4,840 198 — 5,038 
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies51,472 51,472 — (901)50,571 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions47,203 — 47,203 296 (209)47,290 
Total held-to-maturity$342,222 $— $342,222 $3,400 $(2,867)$342,755 
1 Amortized cost and fair values exclude accrued interest receivable of $3.7 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which is included in interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity securities collectively by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics, and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. With regard to MBSs and CMOs issued or guaranteed by the GSEs, and SBA-backed securities, we expect to receive all the contractual principal and interest on these securities as such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of and/or guaranteed by the U.S.
69


 December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
 Amortized
Fair
Gross UnrealizedAmortized
Fair
Gross Unrealized
(in thousands)Cost
Value
Gains
(Losses)
Cost
Value
Gains
(Losses)
Held-to-maturity:        
  Obligations of state and
  political subdivisions
$19,646
$19,998
$383
$(31)$30,856
$31,544
$694
$(6)
  Corporate bonds



3,519
3,518

(1)
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA100,376
100,096
234
(514)10,063
10,035
126
(154)
  CMOs issued by FHLMC31,010
30,938
2
(74)



Total held-to-maturity151,032
151,032
619
(619)44,438
45,097
820
(161)
Available-for-sale:        
Securities of U.S. government agencies:        
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA65,559
65,262
126
(423)193,384
189,959
145
(3,570)
SBA-backed securities25,979
25,982
58
(55)614
607

(7)
CMOs issued by FNMA35,340
35,125
33
(248)13,790
13,772
91
(109)
CMOs issued by FHLMC70,514
69,889
3
(628)43,452
42,758
37
(731)
CMOs issued by GNMA17,953
17,785
26
(194)6,844
6,945
102
(1)
Debentures of government- sponsored agencies12,940
12,938
3
(5)35,486
35,403
7
(90)
Privately issued CMOs1,432
1,431
1
(2)419
419
1
(1)
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions
98,027
97,491
298
(834)79,306
77,701
135
(1,740)
Corporate bonds6,541
6,564
26
(3)4,959
5,016
57

Total available-for-sale334,285
332,467
574
(2,392)378,254
372,580
575
(6,249)
Total investment securities$485,317
$483,499
$1,193
$(3,011)$422,692
$417,677
$1,395
$(6,410)
government. Accordingly, no allowance for credit losses has been recorded for these securities. With regard to securities issued by states and political subdivisions and corporate bonds, management considers: (i) issuer and/or guarantor credit ratings, (ii) historical probability of default and loss given default rates for given bond ratings and remaining maturity, (iii) whether issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities, (iv) internal credit review of the financial information, and (v) whether or not such securities have credit enhancements such as guarantees, contain a defeasance clause, or are pre-refunded by the issuers. Based on the comprehensive analysis, no credit losses are expected.



The following table summarizes the amortized cost of our portfolio of held-to-maturity securities issued by states and political subdivisions and corporate bonds by Moody's and/or Standard & Poor's bond ratings as of December 31, 2022.

Obligations of state and political subdivisionsCorporate bonds
 (in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
AAA / Aaa$42,986 $34,229 $— $— 
AA / Aa19,514 12,873 — — 
A— 101 30,000 — 
Total$62,500 $47,203 $30,000 $— 

A summary of the amortized cost, fair value and allowance for credit losses related to securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 is presented below.

Available-for-sale:
Amortized Cost 1
Gross UnrealizedAllowance for Credit LossesFair Value
(in thousands)Gains(Losses)
December 31, 2022
Securities of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA$109,736 $$(12,133)$— $97,606 
CMOs issued by FHLMC347,437 — (33,682)— 313,755 
CMOs issued by FNMA36,172 — (3,852)— 32,320 
CMOs issued by GNMA35,120 — (3,296)— 31,824 
SBA-backed securities47,724 (3,371)— 44,355 
Debentures of government- sponsored agencies149,114 — (14,008)— 135,106 
U.S. Treasury securities11,904 — (1,635)— 10,269 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions116,855 29 (14,761)— 102,123 
Corporate bonds36,990 — (3,714)— 33,276 
Asset-backed securities1,553 — (91)— 1,462 
Total available-for-sale$892,605 $34 $(90,543)$— $802,096 
December 31, 2021
Securities of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA$316,090 $1,224 $(2,784)$— $314,530 
CMOs issued by FHLMC343,047 3,209 (4,829)— 341,427 
CMOs issued by FNMA48,187 152 (611)— 47,728 
CMOs issued by GNMA56,345 99 (553)— 55,891 
SBA-backed securities32,640 993 (155)— 33,478 
Debentures of government- sponsored agencies191,449 25 (2,947)— 188,527 
U.S. Treasury securities11,886 — (256)— 11,630 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions129,009 5,372 (381)— 134,000 
Corporate bonds39,001 — (506)— 38,495 
Asset-backed securities1,866 — (4)— 1,862 
Total available-for-sale$1,169,520 $11,074 $(13,026)$— $1,167,568 
1 Amortized cost and fair value exclude accrued interest receivable of $3.2 million and $3.7 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which is included in interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

70


As part of our ongoing review of our investment securities portfolio, we reassessed the classification of certain securities issued by government-sponsored agencies. In March 2022, we transferred $357.5 million of these securities from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity at fair value. We intend and have the ability to hold these securities to maturity. The net unrealized pre-tax loss of $14.8 million that remained and the related accumulated other comprehensive loss are accreted to interest income over the remaining lives of the securities. Because these entries offset each other, there is no impact to net income.

The amortized cost and fair value of investment debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20172022 and 2021 are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if the issuers of the securities have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
 Held-to-MaturityAvailable-for-SaleHeld-to-MaturityAvailable-for-Sale
(in thousands)Amortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair Value
Within one year$450 $446 $1,254 $1,239 $101 $103 $10,785 $10,841 
After one but within five years87,418 83,663 335,813 307,843 25,666 26,559 219,474 219,957 
After five years through ten years262,072 222,280 185,997 166,273 182,604 182,303 299,937 300,187 
After ten years622,267 538,850 369,541 326,741 133,851 133,790 639,324 636,583 
Total$972,207 $845,239 $892,605 $802,096 $342,222 $342,755 $1,169,520 $1,167,568 
 December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
 Held-to-MaturityAvailable-for-SaleHeld-to-MaturityAvailable-for-Sale
(in thousands)Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Within one year$2,151
$2,172
$10,268
$10,272
$13,473
$13,506
$20,136
$20,109
After one but within five years15,577
15,791
71,576
71,237
16,706
17,150
58,334
58,267
After five years through ten years54,641
54,554
129,723
128,954
3,000
3,125
113,576
110,842
After ten years78,663
78,515
122,718
122,004
11,259
11,316
186,208
183,362
Total$151,032
$151,032
$334,285
$332,467
$44,438
$45,097
$378,254
$372,580


Sales of investment securities and gross gains and losses are shown in the following table.
(in thousands)201720162015(in thousands)202220212020
Available-for-sale: Available-for-sale:
Sales proceeds$55,408
$68,673
$2,099
Sales proceeds$10,664 $6,632 $33,756 
Gross realized gains$46
$458
$7
Gross realized gains$17 $$916 
Gross realized losses$(231)$(64)$(1) Gross realized losses$(80)$(17)$(1)
Held-to-maturity: 
Sales proceeds$
$1,265
$1,015
Gross realized gains$
$32
$73
Gross realized losses$
$
$
        
Pledged investment securities are shown in the following table:table.
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Pledged to the State of California:
   Secure public deposits in compliance with the Local Agency Security Program$231,307 $213,861 
   Collateral for trust deposits669 729 
   Collateral for Wealth Management and Trust Services checking account564 614 
      Total investment securities pledged to the State of California232,540 215,204 
      Bankruptcy trustee deposits pledged with Federal Reserve Bank
1,686 2,645 
Total pledged investment securities$234,226 $217,849 


71


(in thousands)December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Pledged to the State of California:  
   Secure public deposits in compliance with the Local Agency Security Program$107,829
$108,304
   Collateral for trust deposits761
822
      Total investment securities pledged to the State of California$108,590
$109,126
Collateral for Wealth Management and Trust Services ("WMTS') checking account$2,026
$2,146

As part of our ongoing review of our investment securities portfolio, we reassessed the classification of certain MBS pass-through and CMOs securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA. During 2017, we transferred $129 million of these securities, which we intend and have the ability to hold to maturity, from available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The net unrealized pre-tax losses of $3.0 million at the date of transfer remained in accumulated other comprehensive income and are amortized over the remaining lives of the securities. Amortization of the net unrealized pre-tax losses totaled $426 thousand in 2017, and $21 thousand and $61 thousand in 2016 and 2015, respectively, for securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity in 2014. There were no securities transferred from available-for-sale to held to maturity in 2016 or 2015.

Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired ("OTTI") Debt Securities
We have evaluated the credit of our investment securities407 and their issuers and/or insurers. Based on our evaluation, Management has determined that no investment security in our investment portfolio is other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017. We do not have the intent and it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell the remaining securities temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017 before recovery of the amortized cost basis.


There were 198 and 13410 securities in unrealized loss positions at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Those securities are summarized and classified according to the duration of the loss period in the tables below:below.
December 31, 2022< 12 continuous months≥ 12 continuous monthsTotal securities
 in a loss position
(in thousands)Fair valueUnrealized lossFair valueUnrealized lossFair valueUnrealized loss
Held-to-maturity:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA$62,627 $(5,960)$218,507 $(44,187)$281,134 $(50,147)
CMOs issued by FHLMC78,144 (5,874)113,796 (23,629)191,940 (29,503)
CMOs issued by FNMA106,485 (5,419)— — 106,485 (5,419)
CMOs issued by GNMA27,570 (1,676)10,331 (1,400)37,901 (3,076)
SBA-backed securities2,239 (133)— — 2,239 (133)
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies38,645 (2,530)80,711 (23,937)119,356 (26,467)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions15,155 (589)36,603 (10,152)51,758 (10,741)
Corporate bonds28,448 (1,552)— — 28,448 (1,552)
Total held-to-maturity$359,313 $(23,733)$459,948 $(103,305)$819,261 $(127,038)
Available-for-sale:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA$44,630 $(4,501)$52,235 $(7,632)$96,865 $(12,133)
CMOs issued by FHLMC169,760 (15,144)143,995 (18,538)313,755 (33,682)
CMOs issued by FNMA4,790 (235)27,529 (3,617)32,319 (3,852)
CMOs issued by GNMA8,214 (374)23,612 (2,922)31,826 (3,296)
SBA-backed securities37,845 (3,228)6,133 (143)43,978 (3,371)
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies19,054 (946)116,052 (13,062)135,106 (14,008)
U.S. Treasury securities— — 10,269 (1,635)10,269 (1,635)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions70,402 (9,459)28,711 (5,302)99,113 (14,761)
Corporate bonds— — 33,276 (3,714)33,276 (3,714)
Asset-backed securities— — 1,462 (91)1,462 (91)
Total available-for-sale$354,695 $(33,887)$443,274 $(56,656)$797,969 $(90,543)
Total securities at a loss position$714,008 $(57,620)$903,222 $(159,961)$1,617,230 $(217,581)
72


December 31, 2017< 12 continuous months  ≥ 12 continuous months  
Total securities
 in a loss position
 
(in thousands)Fair value
Unrealized loss
 Fair value
Unrealized loss
 Fair value
Unrealized loss
Held-to-maturity:        
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA$16,337
$(143) $46,845
$(371) $63,182
$(514)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions3,648
(31) 

 3,648
(31)
CMOs issued by FHLMC

11,066
(31) 13,824
(43) 24,890
(74)
Total held-to-maturity31,051
(205) 60,669
(414) 91,720
(619)
Available-for-sale:        
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA32,189
(121) 15,325
(302) 47,514
(423)
SBA-backed securities11,028
(53) 165
(2) 11,193
(55)
CMOs issued by FNMA26,401
(171) 5,440
(77) 31,841
(248)
CMOs issued by FHLMC69,276
(628) 

 69,276
(628)
CMOs issued by GNMA14,230
(194) 

 14,230
(194)
Debentures of government-sponsored agencies2,984
(5) 

 2,984
(5)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions52,197
(288) 19,548
(546) 71,745
(834)
Corporate bonds3,060
(3)    3,060
(3)
Privately issued CMO's1,310
(2) 

 1,310
(2)
Total available-for-sale212,675
(1,465) 40,478
(927) 253,153
(2,392)
Total temporarily impaired securities$243,726
$(1,670) $101,147
$(1,341) $344,873
$(3,011)
December 31, 2016< 12 continuous months  > 12 continuous months  
Total securities
 in a loss position
 
December 31, 2021December 31, 2021< 12 continuous months> 12 continuous monthsTotal securities
 in a loss position
(in thousands)Fair value
Unrealized loss
 Fair value
Unrealized loss
 Fair value
Unrealized loss
(in thousands)Fair valueUnrealized lossFair valueUnrealized lossFair valueUnrealized loss
Held-to-maturity:     Held-to-maturity:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA$2,250
$(154) $
$
 $2,250
$(154)MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA$76,619 $(712)$— $— $76,619 $(712)
CMOs issued by FHLMCCMOs issued by FHLMC54,811 (1,045)— — 54,811 (1,045)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions3,362
(6) 

 3,362
(6)Obligations of state and political subdivisions19,203 (209)— — 19,203 (209)
Corporate bonds3,518
(1) 

 3,518
(1)
Debentures of government-sponsored agenciesDebentures of government-sponsored agencies50,571 (901)— — 50,571 (901)
Total held-to-maturity9,130
(161) 

 9,130
(161)Total held-to-maturity$201,204 $(2,867)— $— $— — $201,204 $(2,867)
Available-for-sale:     Available-for-sale:
MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA161,409
(3,570) 

 161,409
(3,570)MBS pass-through securities issued by FHLMC and FNMA$263,474 $(2,784)$— $— $263,474 $(2,784)
SBA-backed securities607
(7) 

 607
(7)SBA-backed securities7,478 (112)1,209 (43)8,687 (155)
CMOs issued by FNMA9,498
(109) 

 9,498
(109)
CMOs issued by FHLMC31,545
(731) 

 31,545
(731)CMOs issued by FHLMC226,175 (4,677)4,415 (152)230,590 (4,829)
CMOs issued by GNMA1,583
(1) 

 1,583
(1)CMOs issued by GNMA44,790 (553)— — 44,790 (553)
CMOs issued by FNMACMOs issued by FNMA37,348 (611)— — 37,348 (611)
Debentures of government- sponsored agencies19,951
(38) 9,946
(52) 29,897
(90)Debentures of government- sponsored agencies148,979 (2,527)8,549 (420)157,528 (2,947)
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities11,629 (256)— — 11,629 (256)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions59,567
(1,740) 

 59,567
(1,740)Obligations of state and political subdivisions17,552 (381)— — 17,552 (381)
Corporate bonds154
(1) 

 154
(1)Corporate bonds38,495 (506)— — 38,495 (506)
Asset-backed securitiesAsset-backed securities1,861 (4)— — 1,861 (4)
Total available-for-sale284,314
(6,197) 9,946
(52) 294,260
(6,249)Total available-for-sale$797,781 $(12,411)$14,173 $(615)$811,954 $(13,026)
Total temporarily impaired securities$293,444
$(6,358) $9,946
$(52) $303,390
$(6,410)
TotalTotal$998,985 $(15,278)$14,173 $(615)$1,013,158 $(15,893)
 
As of December 31, 2017, fifty-five2022, the investment portfolio included 232 investment securities in our portfoliothat had been in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more. They consisted of thirty-two obligations of U.S. statemore and political subdivisions, four CMOs issued by FHLMC, three CMOs issued by FNMA and sixteen agency MBS securities. We have evaluated each issuer's financial information as well as credit enhancement and guarantees, and believe that the decline in fair value is primarily driven by factors other than credit. It is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms and no other-than-temporary impairment exists on these securities. Based upon our assessment of the credit fundamentals, we concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

There were one hundred forty-three175 investment securities in our portfolio that had been in temporarya loss positionsposition for less than twelve months as of December 31, 2017, and their temporary loss positions mainly arose from changes in interest rates since purchase. They consisted of eighty-one obligations of U.S. state and political subdivisions, five corporate bonds, sixteen agency MBS securities, thirty-four agency CMOs, two privatelymonths.

Securities issued CMOs and five debentures of government-sponsored agencies. Securities ofby government-sponsored agencies, are supportedsuch as FNMA and FHLMC, usually have implicit credit support by the U.S. Federal Government,federal government. However, since 2008, FNMA and FHLMC have been under government conservatorship and, therefore, contractual cash flows for these investments carry explicit guarantees by the U.S. federal government. Securities issued by the SBA and GNMA have explicit credit guarantees by the U.S. federal government, which protects us from credit losses. Other temporarily impaired securitieslosses on the contractual cash flows of the securities.

Our investment in obligations of state and political subdivisions bonds are deemed creditworthycredit worthy after internalour comprehensive analysis of the issuers' latest financial information, credit ratings by major credit agencies, and/or credit enhancements.
At December 31, 2022, management determined that it did not intend to sell any investment securities with unrealized losses, and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell securities with unrealized losses before recovery of their amortized cost. No allowances for credit enhancement. Additionally, alllosses have been recognized on available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, as management does not believe any of the securities are rated as investment grade by at least one major rating agency. As a resultimpaired due to reasons of this impairment analysis, we concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impairedcredit quality at December 31, 2017.2022.


Non-Marketable Securities

FHLB Capital Stock

As a member of the FHLB, we are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB capital stock determined by the Board of Directors of the FHLB. The minimum investment requirements can increase in the event we increase our total asset size or borrowings with the FHLB. Shares cannot be purchased or sold except between the FHLB and its members at the $100$100 per share par value. We held $11.1$16.7 million and $10.2 million of FHLB stock recorded at costincluded in other assets on the consolidated statements of condition at both December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.2021. The carrying amounts of these investments are reasonable estimates of fair value because the securities are restricted to member banks and they
73


do not have a readily determinable market value. Management does not believeBased on our analysis of FHLB’s financial condition and certain qualitative factors, we determined that the FHLB stock is other-than-temporarily-impaired, due to FHLB's current financial position. was not impaired at December 31, 2022 and 2021.  On February 21, 2018,22, 2023, FHLB announced a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 20172022 at an annualized dividend rate of 7.00% to be distributed in mid-March 2018.2023. Cash dividends paid on FHLB capital stock are recorded as non-interest income.


Visa Inc. Class B Common Stock

As a member bank of Visa U.S.A., we hold 16,939held 10,439 shares of Visa Inc. Class B common stock withat both December 31, 2022 and 2021. These shares have a carrying value of zero, which is equal to our cost basis. These shares and are restricted from resale to non-member banks of Visa U.S.A. until their conversion into Class A (voting) shares upon the termination of Visa Inc.'s Covered Litigation escrow account. As a resultBecause of the restriction and the uncertainty on the conversion rate to Class A shares, these shares are not considered available-for-sale and are not carried atlack a readily determinable fair value. When converting this Class B common stock to Class A common stock underbased on the estimated conversion rate of 1.6483,1.5991 and 1.6181, as of the latest SEC Form 10-Q filed by Visa, Inc. on February 1, 2018,December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and the closing stock price of Class A shares at those respective dates, the converted value of our shares of Class B common stock would have been $3.2$3.5 million and $2.2$3.7 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The conversion rate is subject to further reductionadjustment upon the final settlement of the covered litigation against Visa Inc. and its member banks. SeeAs such, the fair value of these Class B shares can differ significantly from their converted values. For further information, refer to Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies herein.Contingencies.


Low Income Housing Tax Credits

We invest in low incomelow-income housing tax credit funds as a limited partner, which totaled $2.1$2.5 million and $2.5$3.0 million recorded in other assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. In 2017,2022, we recognized $332$634 thousand of low income housing tax credits and other tax benefits, net of $331offset by $533 thousand of amortization expense of low incomelow-income housing tax credit investment, as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our unfunded commitments for these low incomelow-income housing tax credit funds totaled $546$386 thousand. We did not recognize any impairment losses on these low incomelow-income housing tax credit investments during 20172022 or 2016,2021, as the value of the future tax benefits exceeds the carrying value of the investments.


On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law, which reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning 2018. Due to the tax rate change, we revised the amortization schedule according to the proportional amortization method for the tax deduction benefits on these low income housing tax credit investments starting in 2018 using the 21% federal tax rate and recorded a catch-up amortization expense of $67 thousand in 2017 as a component of income tax expense.



Note 3:  Loans and Allowance for LoanCredit Losses

Credit QualityThe following table presents the amortized cost of Loansloans by class as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
December 31,
(in thousands)20222021
Commercial and industrial$173,547 $301,602 
Real estate:
  Commercial owner-occupied354,877 392,345 
  Commercial investor-owned1,191,889 1,189,021 
  Construction114,373 119,840 
  Home equity88,748 88,746 
  Other residential112,123 114,558 
Installment and other consumer loans56,989 49,533 
Total loans, at amortized cost 1
2,092,546 2,255,645 
Allowance for credit losses on loans(22,983)(23,023)
Total loans, net of allowance for credit losses on loans$2,069,563 $2,232,622 
1 Amortized cost includes net deferred loan origination costs (fees) of $1.8 million and $(901) thousand at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Amounts are also net of unrecognized purchase discounts of $2.6 million and $2.5 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Amortized cost excludes accrued interest, which totaled $6.1 million and $7.1 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and is included in interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

Lending Risks

Concentrations of Credit- Virtually all of our loans are from customers located in California, primarily in Marin, Alameda, Sonoma, San FranciscoNorthern California. Approximately 90% and Napa counties. Approximately 87% and 85%86% of total loans were secured by real estate at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. At December 31, 2017, 67%2022 and 2021, 74% and 70%, respectively, of our loans were for commercial real estate, 85%the majority of which were secured by real estate located in Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Alameda, San Francisco,
74


Sacramento, and NapaContra Costa counties (California).

The following table shows outstandingincrease in the percentages secured by real estate from 2021 to 2022 was primarily due to a $107.7 million reduction in unsecured loans guaranteed by class and payment aging as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Loan Aging Analysis by Class
(in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential 1

Installment and other consumer
Total
December 31, 2017        
30-59 days past due$
$
$
$
$99
$255
$330
$684
60-89 days past due1,340






1,340
90 days or more past due



307


307
Total past due1,340



406
255
330
2,331
Current234,495
300,963
822,984
63,828
132,061
95,271
27,080
1,676,682
Total loans 3
$235,835
$300,963
$822,984
$63,828
$132,467
$95,526
$27,410
$1,679,013
Non-accrual loans 2
$
$
$
$
$406
$
$
$406
December 31, 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30-59 days past due$283
$
$
$
$77
$
$2
$362
60-89 days past due





49
49
90 days or more past due



91


91
Total past due283



168

51
502
Current218,332
247,713
724,228
74,809
117,039
78,549
25,444
1,486,114
Total loans 3
$218,615
$247,713
$724,228
$74,809
$117,207
$78,549
$25,495
$1,486,616
Non-accrual loans 2
$
$
$
$
$91
$
$54
$145
1 Our residential loan portfolio does not include sub-prime loans, nor is it our practice to underwrite loans commonly referred to as "Alt-A mortgages," the characteristics ofSBA under the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"), which are loans lacking full documentation, borrowers having low FICO scores or higher loan-to-value ratios.included in commercial and industrial loans.


2 There were three purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans with unpaid balances totaling $131 thousandCommercial and no carrying values that had stopped accreting interest at December 31, 2017. There were no PCI loans that had stopped accreting interest at December 31, 2016. Amounts exclude accreting PCI loans of $2.1 million and $2.9 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as we have a reasonable expectation about future cash flows to be collected and we continue to recognize accretable yield on these loans in interest income. There were no accruing loans past due more than ninety days at December 31, 2017 or 2016.

3 Amounts include net deferred loan origination costs of $818 thousand and $883 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amounts are also net of unaccreted purchase discounts on non-PCI loans of $1.2 million and $1.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Our commercialIndustrial Loans - Commercial loans are generally made to established small and mid-sized businesses to provide financing for their growth and working capital needs, equipment purchases and acquisitions.  Management examines historical, current, and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay obligations as agreed. Commercial loans are made based primarily on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral and guarantor support. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not occur as expected, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed, such as accounts receivable and inventory, and typically include a personal guarantee.guarantees. We target stable businesses with guarantors who provide additional sources of repayment and have proven to be resilient in periods of economic stress.  A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer and/or business spending, will have an effect on the credit quality of commercial loans.
 
Pursuant to the 2020 CARES Act, Bank of Marin originated 2,876 SBA-guaranteed loans totaling $444.1 million in two rounds of the Small Business Administration's ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). Additionally in 2021, Bank of Marin assumed 113 PPP loans totaling $18.6 million from AMRB as of the merger date. As of December 31, 2022, there were 18 PP loans outstanding totaling $3.5 million (net of $99 thousand in unrecognized fees and costs), compared to 368 loans at December 31, 2021 totaling $111.2 million (net of $2.5 million in unrecognized fees and costs) included in commercial and industrial loan balances. PPP loans have terms of two to five years and earn interest at 1%. In addition, the SBA paid the Bank a fee of 1%-5% depending on the loan amount, which was netted with loan origination costs and amortized into interest income using the effective yield method over the contractual life of each loan. The recognition of fees and costs is accelerated when the loan is forgiven by the SBA and/or paid off prior to maturity. PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and are expected to be forgiven by the SBA if they meet the requirements of the program.

Commercial Real Estate Loans - Commercial real estate loans, which include income producing investment properties and owner-occupied real estate used for business purposes, are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans discussed above. We underwrite these loans to be repaid from cash flow from either the business or investment property and to be supported by real property collateral. Underwriting standards for commercial real estate loans include, but are not limited to, debt coverage and loan-to-value ratios. Furthermore, substantially alla large majority of our loans are guaranteed by the owners of the properties. Commercial real estate loans may be adversely affected by conditionsConditions in the real estate markets or downturn in the general economy.economy may adversely affect our commercial real estate loans. In the event of a vacancy, we expect guarantors are expected to carry the loans until they find a replacement tenant can be found.tenant.  The owner's substantial equity investment provides a strong economic incentive to continue to support the commercial real estate projects. As such, we have generally experienced a relatively low level of loss and delinquencies in this portfolio.




Construction Loans - Construction loans are generally made to developers and builders to finance construction, renovation and occasionally land acquisitions in anticipation of near-term development. Construction loans include interest reserves that are used for the payment of interest during the development and marketing periods and are capitalized as part of the loan balance. When a construction loan is placed on nonaccrual status before the depletion of the interest reserve, we apply the interest funded by the interest reserve against the loan's principal balance. These loans are underwritten after evaluation of the borrower's financial strength, reputation, prior track record, and independent appraisals. TheWe monitor all construction industryprojects to determine whether they are on schedule, completed as planned and in accordance with the approved construction budgets. Significant events can be affected by significant events,affect the construction industry, including: the inherent volatility of real estate markets and vulnerability to delays due to weather, change orders, inability to obtain construction permits, labor or material shortages, and price changes. Estimates of construction costs and value associated with the completed project may be inaccurate. Repayment of construction loans is largely dependent on the ultimate success of the project.

Consumer Loans - Consumer loans primarily consist of home equity lines of credit, and other residential tenancy-in-common fractional interest loans, ("TIC"), floating homes and mobile homesindirect luxury auto loans along with a small number of installment loans. Our other residential loans include tenancy-in-common fractional interest loans ("TIC") located almost entirely in San Francisco County. We originate consumer loans utilizing credit score information, debt-to-income ratio and loan-to-value ratio analysis.
75


Diversification among consumer loan types, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, mitigates risk. Our otherWe do not originate sub-prime residential mortgage loans, include TIC units located almost entirely in San Francisco County.nor is it our practice to underwrite loans commonly referred to as "Alt-A mortgages," the characteristics of which are reduced documentation, borrowers with low FICO scores or collateral with high loan-to-value ratios.

Credit Quality Indicators
 
We use a risk rating system to evaluate asset quality, and to identify and monitor credit risk in individual loans, and in the loan portfolio. DefinitionsOur definitions of loans that are“Special Mention” risk graded “Special Mention”loans, or worse, are consistent with those used by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").  Our internally assigned grades are as follows:
 
Pass and Watch: - Loans to borrowers of acceptable or better credit quality. Borrowers in this category demonstrate fundamentally sound financial positions, repayment capacity, credit history, and management expertise.  Loans in this category must have an identifiable and stable source of repayment and meet the Bank’s policy regarding debt service coveragedebt-service-coverage ratios.  These borrowers are capable of sustaining normal economic, market or operational setbacks without significant financial consequences.  Negative external industry factors are generally not present.  The loan may be secured, unsecured or supported by non-real estate collateral for which the value is more difficult to determine and/or marketability is more uncertain. This category also includes “Watch” loans, where the primary source of repayment has been delayed. “Watch” is intended to be a transitional grade, with either an upgrade or downgrade within a reasonable period.
 
Special Mention: - Potential weaknesses that deserve close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the payment prospects for the asset. Special Mention assets do not present sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
 
Substandard: - Inadequately protected by either the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged, if any. A Substandard asset has a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize(s) the liquidation of the debt. Substandard assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if such weaknesses or deficiencies are not corrected. Well-defined weaknesses include adverse trends or developments of the borrower’s financial condition, managerial weaknesses and/or significant collateral deficiencies.
 
Doubtful: - Critical weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full improbable. There may be specific pending events that work to strengthen the asset; however, the amount or timing of the loss may not be determinable. Pending events generally occur within one year of the asset being classified as Doubtful. Examples include: merger, acquisition, or liquidation; capital injection; guarantee; perfecting liens on additional collateral; and refinancing. Such loans are placed on non-accrual status and usually are collateral-dependent.


We regularly review our credits for accuracy of risk grades whenever we receive new information is received.and at each quarterly and year-end reporting period. Borrowers are generally required to submit financial information at regular intervals. Generally,Typically, commercial borrowers with lines of credit are required to submit financial information with reporting intervals ranging from monthly to annually depending on credit size, risk and complexity. InvestorIn addition, investor commercial real estate borrowers with loans exceeding a certain dollar threshold are generallyusually required to submit rent rolls or property income statements annually. ConstructionWe monitor construction loans are monitored monthly, and reviewed on an ongoing basis. Homemonthly. We review home equity and other consumer loans are reviewed based on delinquency. LoansWe also review loans graded “Watch” or worse, regardless of loan type, are reviewed no less than quarterly.



76


The following tables present the loan portfolio by loan class, origination year and internal risk rating as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. We early adopted the vintage disclosure requirements of ASU 2022-02 prospectively as described in Note 2 beginning with the first quarter of 2022. Accordingly, the 2022 vintage table reflects gross charge-offs by loan class and year of origination. Generally, existing term loans that were re-underwritten are reflected in the table in the year of renewal. Lines of credit that have a conversion feature at the time of origination, such as construction to perm loans, are presented by year of origination.

(in thousands)Term Loans - Amortized Cost by Origination YearRevolving Loans Amortized Cost
December 31, 202220222021202020192018PriorTotal
Commercial and industrial:
Pass and Watch$15,349 $6,679 $7,603 $19,982 $5,362 $24,954 $84,655 $164,584 
Special Mention275 — — 2,272 3,836 — 402 6,785 
Substandard— — 1,252 — — 625 301 2,178 
Total commercial and industrial$15,624 $6,679 $8,855 $22,254 $9,198 $25,579 $85,358 $173,547 
Gross current period charge-offs$— $— $(9)$— $— $— $— $(9)
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied:
Pass and Watch$54,188 $52,080 $40,369 $44,798 $29,856 $104,377 $— $325,668 
Special Mention— 16,199 — 304 5,255 4,493 — 26,251 
Substandard— — — 1,160 — 1,699 — 2,859 
Doubtful— — 99 — — — — 99 
Total commercial real estate, owner-occupied$54,188 $68,279 $40,468 $46,262 $35,111 $110,569 $— $354,877 
Commercial real estate, investor-owned:
Pass and Watch$177,822 $211,228 $155,278 $160,670 $129,166 $308,509 $57 $1,142,730 
Special Mention— 1,172 12,097 3,934 678 9,290 — 27,171 
Substandard— 2,264 — — — 19,724 — 21,988 
Total commercial real estate, investor-owned$177,822 $214,664 $167,375 $164,604 $129,844 $337,523 $57 $1,191,889 
Construction:
Pass and Watch$49,262 $19,393 $28,861 $7,745 $9,112 $— $— $114,373 
Total construction$49,262 $19,393 $28,861 $7,745 $9,112 $— $— $114,373 
Home equity:
Pass and Watch$— $— $— $— $— $883 $86,971 $87,854 
Substandard— — — — — 480 414 894 
Total home equity$— $— $— $— $— $1,363 $87,385 $88,748 
Other residential:
Pass and Watch$21,154 $14,547 $29,018 $21,890 $11,064 $14,450 $— $112,123 
Total other residential$21,154 $14,547 $29,018 $21,890 $11,064 $14,450 $— $112,123 
Installment and other consumer:
Pass and Watch$20,054 $13,022 $5,727 $6,492 $4,181 $6,478 $944 $56,898 
Substandard— — — — — 91 — 91 
Total installment and other consumer$20,054 $13,022 $5,727 $6,492 $4,181 $6,569 $944 $56,989 
Gross current period charge-offs$— $— $— $— $— $(18)$(5)$(23)
Total loans:
Pass and Watch$337,829 $316,949 $266,856 $261,577 $188,741 $459,651 $172,627 $2,004,230 
Total Special Mention$275 $17,371 $12,097 $6,510 $9,769 $13,783 $402 $60,207 
Total Substandard$— $2,264 $1,252 $1,160 $— $22,619 $715 $28,010 
Total Doubtful$— $— $99 $— $— $— $— $99 
Totals$338,104 $336,584 $280,304 $269,247 $198,510 $496,053 $173,744 $2,092,546 
Total gross current period charge-offs$— $— $(9)$— $— $(18)$(5)$(32)
77


(in thousands)Term Loans - Amortized Cost by Origination YearRevolving Loans Amortized Cost
December 31, 202120212020201920182017PriorTotal
Commercial and industrial:
Pass and Watch$96,643 $35,967 $25,754 $12,763 $2,729 $31,280 $90,744 $295,880 
Special Mention— 1,700 584 273 — — 2,088 4,645 
Substandard— — — — — — 1,077 1,077 
Total commercial and industrial$96,643 $37,667 $26,338 $13,036 $2,729 $31,280 $93,909 $301,602 
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied:
Pass and Watch$58,395 $43,216 $49,485 $36,174 $42,430 $104,898 $— $334,598 
Special Mention16,748 — — 7,846 — 16,996 — 41,590 
Substandard— 7,155 285 — — 8,603 — 16,043 
Doubtful$— $114 $— $— $— $— $— $114 
Total commercial real estate, owner-occupied$75,143 $50,485 $49,770 $44,020 $42,430 $130,497 $— $392,345 
Commercial real estate, investor-owned:
Pass and Watch$225,722 $186,214 $187,418 $143,028 $75,419 $325,882 $84 $1,143,767 
Special Mention— 1,214 2,714 11,773 1,787 9,540 — 27,028 
Substandard— — — 695 — 17,531 — 18,226 
Total commercial real estate, investor-owned$225,722 $187,428 $190,132 $155,496 $77,206 $352,953 $84 $1,189,021 
Construction:
Pass and Watch$31,269 $70,528 $8,935 $9,108 $— $— $— $119,840 
Total construction$31,269 $70,528 $8,935 $9,108 $— $— $— $119,840 
Home equity:
Pass and Watch$— $— $— $— $10 $268 $87,693 $87,971 
Substandard— — — — — 377 398 775 
Total home equity$— $— $— $— $10 $645 $88,091 $88,746 
Other residential:
Pass and Watch$15,800 $31,981 $25,529 $15,411 $7,964 $17,873 $— $114,558 
Total other residential$15,800 $31,981 $25,529 $15,411 $7,964 $17,873 $— $114,558 
Installment and other consumer:
Pass and Watch$17,207 $7,748 $9,436 $5,633 $1,123 $6,620 $1,766 $49,533 
Total installment and other consumer$17,207 $7,748 $9,436 $5,633 $1,123 $6,620 $1,766 $49,533 
Total loans:
Pass and Watch$445,036 $375,654 $306,557 $222,117 $129,675 $486,821 $180,287 $2,146,147 
Total Special Mention$16,748 $2,914 $3,298 $19,892 $1,787 $26,536 $2,088 $73,263 
Total Substandard$— $7,155 $285 $695 $— $26,511 $1,475 $36,121 
Total Doubtful$— $114 $— $— $— $— $— $114 
Totals$461,784 $385,837 $310,140 $242,704 $131,462 $539,868 $183,850 $2,255,645 


78


The following table represents an analysisshows the amortized cost of loans by class, payment aging and non-accrual status as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Loan Aging Analysis by Class
(in thousands)Commercial and industrialCommercial real estate, owner-occupiedCommercial real estate, investor-ownedConstructionHome equityOther residentialInstallment and other consumerTotal
December 31, 2022        
30-59 days past due$$— $— $— $319 $93 $$420 
60-89 days past due— — — — 244 — — 244 
90 days or more past due 1
264 — — — 414 — — 678 
Total past due267 — — — 977 93 1,342 
Current173,280 354,877 1,191,889 114,373 87,771 112,030 56,984 2,091,204 
Total loans 1
$173,547 $354,877 $1,191,889 $114,373 $88,748 $112,123 $56,989 $2,092,546 
Non-accrual loans 2
$— $1,563 $— $— $778 $— $91 $2,432 
Non-accrual loans with no allowance$— $1,563 $— $— $778 $— $91 $2,432 
December 31, 2021        
30-59 days past due$$— $— $— $498 $— $1,036 $1,536 
60-89 days past due394 — — — 67 — — 461 
90 days or more past due 1
229 — — — 88 — — 317 
Total past due625 — — — 653 — 1,036 2,314 
Current300,977 392,345 1,189,021 119,840 88,093 114,558 48,497 2,253,331 
Total loans 1
$301,602 $392,345 $1,189,021 $119,840 $88,746 $114,558 $49,533 $2,255,645 
Non-accrual loans 2
$— $7,269 $694 $— $413 $— $— $8,376 
Non-accrual loans with no allowance$— $7,269 $694 $— $413 $— $— $8,376 
1 There were no non-performing loans past due more than ninety days and accruing interest at December 31, 2022 and 2021. There were $264 thousand and $229 thousand in SBA PPP loans included in commercial and industrial that were past due ninety days as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for which the loan was either in process of SBA forgiveness or purchase.
2 None of the carrying amount innon-accrual loans netas of deferred fees and costs and purchase premiums or discounts, by internally assigned risk grades, including PCI loans, at December 31, 20172022 or 2021 were earning interest on a cash basis. We recognized no interest income on non-accrual loans in 2022, 2021 or 2020. Accrued interest of $48 thousand was reversed from interest income for the loans that were placed on non-accrual status in 2022. No interest income was reversed for the single loan that was placed on non-accrual status in 2021.

Collateral Dependent Loans

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of individually analyzed collateral-dependent loans, which are on non-accrual status, by class at December 31, 2022 and 2016.2021.

Amortized Cost by Collateral Type
(in thousands)Commercial Real EstateResidential Real EstateOther
Total1
Allowance for Credit Losses
December 31, 2022
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied$1,563 $— $— $1,563 $— 
Home equity— 778 — 778 — 
Installment and other consumer— — 91 91 — 
Total$1,563 $778 $91 $2,432 $— 
December 31, 2021
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied$7,269 $— $— $7,269 $— 
Commercial real estate, investor-owned694 — — 694 — 
Home equity— 413 — 413 — 
Total$7,963 $413 $— $8,376 $— 

1There were no collateral-dependent residential real estate mortgage loans in process of foreclosure or in substance repossessed, at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The weighted average loan-to-value of collateral-dependent loans was approximately 42% and 67% at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

79

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Risk Grade
(in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential
Installment and other consumer
Purchased credit-impaired
Total
December 31, 2017        
Pass$214,636
$281,104
$818,570
$60,859
$130,558
$95,526
$27,287
$1,325
$1,629,865
Special Mention9,318
9,284
1,850




790
21,242
Substandard11,816
9,409
1,774
2,969
1,815

123

27,906
Total loans$235,770
$299,797
$822,194
$63,828
$132,373
$95,526
$27,410
$2,115
$1,679,013
December 31, 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass$201,987
$234,849
$720,417
$71,564
$115,680
$78,549
$25,083
$2,920
$1,451,049
Special Mention9,197
4,799
607

1,334



15,937
Substandard7,391
6,993
1,498
3,245
91

412

19,630
Total loans$218,575
$246,641
$722,522
$74,809
$117,105
$78,549
$25,495
$2,920
$1,486,616

Troubled Debt Restructuring

OurThe following table summarizes the amortized cost of TDR loans by loan portfolio includes certainclass as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
December 31,
(in thousands)20222021
Commercial and industrial$900 $1,183 
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied1,160 7,155 
Commercial real estate, investor-owned160 179 
Home equity619 386 
Installment and other consumer549 607 
Total 1
$3,388 $9,510 
1 TDR loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. TDRs on non-accrual status totaled $1.6 million and $7.4 million at the timeDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Unfunded commitments for TDR loans totaled $209 thousand and $441 thousand as of restructure may be returned to accruing status after Management considers the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months,December 31, 2022 and obtains reasonable assurance of repayment and performance.2021, respectively.

A loan may no longer be reported as a TDR ifAfter meeting all of the following conditions are met:
Thespecified in Note 1, we removed one commercial loan is subsequently refinanced or restructured at current market interest rateswith a remaining amortized cost of $2 thousand and the new terms are consistent with the treatmentan unfunded commitment of creditworthy borrowers under regular underwriting standards;
The borrower is no longer considered to be in financial difficulty;
Performance on the loan is reasonably assured, and;
Existing loan did not have any forgiveness of principal or interest.

The removal of$600 thousand from TDR status must be approved by the same Management level that approved the upgrading of the loan classification.

designation during 2021. There were no loans removed from TDR designation during 2017either 2022 or 2016. During 2015, five loans with a recorded investment totaling $1.6 million were removed from TDR designation, after meeting all of the conditions noted above.2020.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount of TDR loans by loan class as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(in thousands)As of
Recorded investment in Troubled Debt Restructurings 1
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Commercial and industrial$2,165
$2,207
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied6,999
6,993
Commercial real estate, investor2,171
2,256
Construction2,969
3,245
Home equity347
625
Other residential1,148
1,965
Installment and other consumer721
877
Total$16,520
$18,168
1 There were no TDR loans on non-accrual status at December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016. Includes no acquired TDR loans as of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.


The following table presents information for loans modified in a TDR during the presented periods, including the number of modified contracts, modified, the recorded investment inamortized cost of the loans prior to modification, and the recorded investment inamortized cost of the loans at period end after being restructured. The table excludes fully charged-off TDR loans and loans modified in a TDR and subsequently paid-off during the years presented.presented, if applicable.

(dollars in thousands)Number of Contracts ModifiedPre-Modification Amortized CostPost-Modification Amortized CostPost-Modification Amortized Cost at Period End
TDRs modified during 2022:   
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied$1,758 $1,758 $1,160 
Home equity247 247 240 
Total$2,005 $2,005 $1,400 
TDRs modified during 2021:   
Commercial and industrial$1,101 $1,101 $901 
Home equity120 120 120 
Total$1,221 $1,221 $1,021 
TDRs modified during 2020:
Commercial and industrial$170 $162 $96 
Commercial real estate, investor-owned1,553 1,553 1,553 
Home equity276 276 271 
Installment and other consumer204 204 201 
Total$2,203 $2,195 $2,121 


(dollars in thousands)Number of Contracts Modified
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment at Period End
TDRs modified during 2017: 
 
 
 
Installment and other consumer1
$50
$50
$47
TDRs modified during 2016: 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate, investor2
$1,830
$1,826
$1,752
Home equity 1
1
87
222
245
Installment and other consumer1
68
67
66
Total4
$1,985
$2,115
$2,063
1 The home equity line of credit modified in 2016 included debt consolidation, which increased the post-modification balance.
TDRs modified during 2015:    
Commercial and industrial7
$3,271
$3,251
$2,811

The loan modifications in 2022 included one or more of the following: payment deferment, maturity date extension, interest rate concession, and/or other payment modifications. The loans modified during 2017, 20162021 and 2015 primarily involved maturity or payment extensions,2020 reflected debt consolidation, interest rate concessions, renewals,and/or other loan term and other changes to loan terms.payment modifications that did not meet the criteria specified by the 2020 CARES Act for temporary relief from TDR accounting. During 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, there were no other defaults on loans that had been modified in a TDR within the prior twelve-month period. We report defaulted TDRs based on a payment default definition of more than ninety days past due.


Impaired
80


Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Rollforward


The following tables summarize information by class on impaired loans and their related allowances. Total impaired loans include non-accrual loans, accruing TDR loans and accreting PCI loans that have experienced post-acquisition declines in cash flows expected to be collected.
(in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential
Installment and other consumer
Total
December 31, 2017       
Recorded investment in impaired loans:      
With no specific allowance recorded$309
$
$
$2,689
$406
$995
$46
$4,445
With a specific allowance recorded1,856
6,999
2,171
280
347
153
675
12,481
Total recorded investment in impaired loans$2,165
$6,999
$2,171
$2,969
$753
$1,148
$721
$16,926
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans$2,278
$6,993
$2,168
$2,963
$750
$1,147
$720
$17,019
Specific allowance$50
$188
$159
$7
$6
$1
$102
$513
Average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2017$2,113
$6,998
$2,842
$3,132
$679
$1,324
$841
$17,929
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2017 1
$202
$266
$87
$147
$24
$62
$37
$825
December 31, 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded investment in impaired loans: 
 
 
 
 
 
With no specific allowance recorded$315
$
$
$2,692
$91
$1,008
$103
$4,209
With a specific allowance recorded1,892
6,993
2,256
553
624
957
829
14,104
Total recorded investment in impaired loans$2,207
$6,993
$2,256
$3,245
$715
$1,965
$932
$18,313
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans$2,177
$6,993
$2,252
$3,238
$713
$1,965
$932
$18,270
Specific allowance$285
$163
$375
$8
$7
$55
$98
$991
Average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2016$3,514
$7,069
$2,950
$3,242
$945
$1,988
$1,127
$20,835
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2016 1
$175
$199
$1,514
$137
$60
$90
$48
$2,223
Average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2015$4,237
$7,886
$2,833
$4,164
$602
$2,028
$1,523
$23,273
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2015 1
$238
$295
$33
$86
$18
$92
$64
$826
1 Interest income recognized on a cash basis totaled $100 thousand in 2017 and was primarily related to the pay-off of a commercial non-accrual PCI loan in the fourth quarter. Interest income recognized on a cash basis totaled $1.4 million in 2016 and was primarily related to the interest recovery upon the pay-off of a partially charged off non-accrual commercial real estate loan during the third quarter. No interest income on impaired loans was recognized on a cash basis in 2015.

Management monitors delinquent loans continuously and identifies problem loans, generally loans graded substandard or worse, loans on non-accrual status and loans modified in a TDR, to be evaluated individually for impairment testing.


Generally, the recorded investment in impaired loans is net of any charge-offs from estimated losses related to specifically-identified impaired loans when they are deemed uncollectible. There were no charged-off portions of impaired loans outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016. In addition, the recorded investment in impaired loans is net of purchase discounts or premiums on acquired loans and deferred fees and costs. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, outstanding commitments to extend credit on impaired loans, including performing loans to borrowers whose terms have been modified in TDRs, totaled $935 thousand and $1.6 million, respectively.

The following tables disclosetable discloses activity in the allowance for loancredit losses ("ALLL") andfor the recorded investmentperiods presented.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Rollforward
(in thousands)Commercial and industrialCommercial real estate, owner-occupiedCommercial real estate, investor-ownedConstructionHome equityOther residentialInstallment and other consumerUnallocatedTotal
Year ended December 31, 2022
Beginning balance$1,709 $2,776 $12,739 $1,653 $595 $644 $621 $2,286 $23,023 
Provision (reversal)72 (289)(63)251 (37)(49)270 (218)(63)
(Charge-offs)(9)— — — — — (23)— (32)
Recoveries22 — — 33 — — — — 55 
Ending balance$1,794 $2,487 $12,676 $1,937 $558 $595 $868 $2,068 $22,983 
Year ended December 31, 2021
Beginning balance$2,530 $2,778 $12,682 $1,557 $738 $998 $291 $1,300 22,874 
Provision (reversal)(1,240)(561)(476)62 (193)(360)333 986 (1,449)
Initial allowance for PCD loans 1
405 559 533 — — — 1,505 
(Charge-offs)— — — — — — (5)— (5)
Recoveries14 — — 34 50 — — — 98 
Ending balance$1,709 $2,776 $12,739 $1,653 $595 $644 $621 $2,286 $23,023 
Year ended December 31, 2020 2
Beginning balance$2,334 $2,462 $8,483 $638 $850 $973 $284 $653 $16,677 
Provision - incurred loss method208 673 3,141 219 188 287 122 612 5,450 
(Charge-offs)(30)— — — — — — — (30)
Recoveries13 — — — — — — 16 
Balance at September 30, 20202,525 3,135 11,624 860 1,038 1,260 406 1,265 22,113 
Impact of CECL adoption(278)138 1,755 201 (361)(212)(125)486 1,604 
Post adoption balance at October 1, 20202,247 3,273 13,379 1,061 677 1,048 281 1,751 23,717 
Provision (reversal) - CECL method269 (495)(697)496 61 (50)11 (451)(856)
(Charge-offs)— — — — — — (1)— (1)
Recoveries14 — — — — — — — 14 
Ending balance$2,530 $2,778 $12,682 $1,557 $738 $998 $291 $1,300 $22,874 
1 The initial allowance for PCD loans relates to the AMRB merger discussed in loans by class, as well asNote 18, Merger.
2 Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for a discussion of our methodology for the related ALLL disaggregated by impairment evaluation method.
Allowance for Loan Losses Rollforward for the Year Ended
(in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential
Installment and other consumer
Unallocated
Total
Year ended December 31, 2017       
Beginning balance$3,248
$1,753
$6,320
$781
$973
$454
$372
$1,541
$15,442
Provision (reversal)584
541
155
(100)58
82
3
(823)500
Charge-offs(289)




(4)
(293)
Recoveries111





7

118
Ending balance$3,654
$2,294
$6,475
$681
$1,031
$536
$378
$718
$15,767
Year ended December 31, 2016         
Beginning balance$3,023
$2,249
$6,178
$724
$910
$394
$425
$1,096
$14,999
Provision (reversal)93
(476)(2,014)57
60
60
(75)445
(1,850)
Charge-offs(11)(20)



(5)
(36)
Recoveries143

2,156

3

27

2,329
Ending balance$3,248
$1,753
$6,320
$781
$973
$454
$372
$1,541
$15,442
Year ended December 31, 2015         
Beginning balance$2,837
$1,924
$6,672
$839
$859
$433
$566
$969
$15,099
Provision (reversal)(45)325
(517)724
48
(39)(123)127
500
Charge-offs(5)

(839)

(20)
(864)
Recoveries236

23

3

2

264
Ending balance$3,023
$2,249
$6,178
$724
$910
$394
$425
$1,096
$14,999
Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment In Loans
(dollars in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential
Installment and other consumer
Unallocated
Total
December 31, 2017         
Ending ALLL related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment$3,604
$2,106
$6,316
$674
$1,025
$535
$276
$718
$15,254
Ending ALLL related to loans individually evaluated for impairment50
188
159
7
6
1
102

513
Ending ALLL related to purchased credit-impaired loans








Ending balance$3,654
$2,294
$6,475
$681
$1,031
$536
$378
$718
$15,767
Recorded Investment: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment$233,605
$292,798
$820,023
$60,859
$131,620
$94,378
$26,689
$
$1,659,972
Individually evaluated for impairment2,165
6,999
2,171
2,969
753
1,148
721

16,926
Purchased credit-impaired65
1,166
790

94



2,115
Total$235,835
$300,963
$822,984
$63,828
$132,467
$95,526
$27,410
$
$1,679,013
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans1.55%0.76%0.79%1.07%0.78%0.56%1.38%NM
0.94%
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loansNM
NM
NM
NM
254%NM
NM
NM
3,883%
NM - Not Meaningful


Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment In Loans
(dollars in thousands)Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate, owner-occupied
Commercial real estate, investor
Construction
Home equity
Other residential
Installment and other consumer
Unallocated
Total
December 31, 2016         
Ending ALLL related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment$2,963
$1,590
$5,945
$773
$966
$399
$274
$1,541
$14,451
Ending ALLL related to loans individually evaluated for impairment285
163
375
8
7
55
98

991
Ending ALLL related to purchased credit-impaired loans








Ending balance$3,248
$1,753
$6,320
$781
$973
$454
$372
$1,541
$15,442
Loans outstanding: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment$216,368
$239,648
$720,266
$71,564
$116,390
$76,584
$24,563
$
$1,465,383
Individually evaluated for impairment2,207
6,993
2,256
3,245
715
1,965
932

18,313
Purchased credit-impaired40
1,072
1,706

102



2,920
Total$218,615
$247,713
$724,228
$74,809
$117,207
$78,549
$25,495
$
$1,486,616
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans1.49%0.71%0.87%1.04%0.83%0.58%1.46%NM
1.04%
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loansNM
NM
NM
NM
1,071%NM
683%NM
10,650%
NM - Not Meaningful

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
Acquired loans are considered credit-impaired if there is evidence of significant deterioration of credit quality since origination and it is probable, at the acquisition date, that we will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. Management has determined certain loans purchased in our two bank acquisitions to be PCI loans based on credit indicators such as nonaccrual status, past due status, loan risk grade, loan-to-value ratio, etc. Revolving credit agreements (e.g., home equity lines of credit and revolving commercial loans) are not considered PCI loans as cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated.
The following table reflects the unpaid principal balance and related carrying value of PCI loans:
PCI LoansDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2016

(in thousands)
Unpaid Principal Balance
Carrying Value
Unpaid Principal Balance
Carrying Value
Commercial and industrial$276
$65
$45
$40
Commercial real estate, owner occupied1,297
1,166
1,344
1,072
Commercial real estate, investor1,064
790
1,713
1,706
Construction



Home equity231
94
248
102
Total purchased credit-impaired loans$2,868
$2,115
$3,350
$2,920
The activities in the accretable yield, or income expected to be earned over the remaining livesadoption of the PCI loans were as follows:current expected credit loss ("CECL") accounting standards in 2020.
Accretable YieldYears ended
(in thousands)December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Balance at beginning of period$1,476
$2,618
$4,027
Additions109


Removals 1

(778)(914)
Accretion(331)(364)(495)
Balance at end of period$1,254
$1,476
$2,618
1 Represents the accretable difference that is relieved when a loan exits the PCI population due to payoff, full charge-off, or transfer to repossessed assets, etc.




Pledged Loans

Our FHLB line of credit is secured under terms of a blanket collateral agreement by a pledge of certain qualifying loans with unpaid principal balances of $887.9 million$1.298 billion and$869.2 million $1.330 billion at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. In addition, we pledge a certain residential loan portfolio,eligible TIC loans, which totaled $67.6$105.0 million and $54.6$106.2 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, to secure our borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF("FRB"). Also,For additional information, see Note 7, Borrowings.


Related Party Loans


The Bank has, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of its business with directors, officers, principal shareholders and their businesses or associates. These transactions, including loans, are granted on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral on loans, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with persons not related to us. Likewise, these transactions do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. During the first and fourth quarters of 2017, two new directors joined our Board of Directors resulting


81


The following table shows changes in the reclassification of existing loans to those directors and their businesses as related party status.

An analysis of net loans to related parties for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015 is as follows:2020.
(in thousands)202220212020
Balance at beginning of year$7,942 $6,423 $8,333 
Additions1,525 — — 
Assumed in the AMRB acquisition— 4,037 — 
Repayments(364)(2,518)(1,910)
Reclassified due to a change in borrower status(2,658)— — 
Balance at end of year$6,445 $7,942 $6,423 
(in thousands)2017
2016
2015
Balance at beginning of year$1,988
$2,562
$3,329
Additions3,186


Advances74

165
Repayments(128)(574)(390)
Reclassified due to a change in borrower status6,732

(542)
Balance at end of year$11,852
$1,988
$2,562


Undisbursed commitments to related parties totaled $9.1 million$562 thousand and $1.1$8.6 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The decreases in both the outstanding amount and undisbursed commitments as of December 31, 2022 were primarily due to a Director retirement in the first quarter.
 
Note 4:  Bank Premises and Equipment


A summary of Bankbank premises and equipment at December 31 follows:
December 31,
(in thousands)20222021
Leasehold improvements$16,115 $15,282 
Furniture and equipment12,762 11,384 
Buildings1,217 1,195 
Land1,170 1,170 
Finance lease right-of-use assets 1
616 499 
Subtotal31,880 29,530 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(23,746)(21,972)
Bank premises and equipment, net$8,134 $7,558 
1 See Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information.
(in thousands)2017
2016
Leasehold improvements$14,937
$13,883
Furniture and equipment11,113
10,627
Subtotal26,050
24,510
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(17,438)(15,990)
Bank premises and equipment, net$8,612
$8,520


The amount of depreciation and amortization totaled $1.9 million, $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $2.0$2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


Note 5:  Bank Owned Life Insurance


We own life insurance policies on the lives of certain current and former officers designated by the Board of Directors to fund our employee benefit programs, and deathprograms. Death benefits provided under the specific terms of these insurance policies are estimated to be $81.9$131.9 million at December 31, 2017.2022. The benefits to employees' beneficiaries are limited to theeach employee's active service period. The investment in bank owned life insuranceBOLI policies are reported in interest receivable and other assets at their cash surrender value, net of $38.1surrender charges, of $67.1 million and $32.4$61.5 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The cash surrender value includes both the original premiums paid for the life insurance policies and the accumulated accretion of policy income since inception of the policies. Incomepolicies, net of $845mortality costs and other fees. Earnings on BOLI totaled $1.2 million, $2.2 million and $973 thousand, $844 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These earnings included death benefit proceeds in excess of the cash surrender values of the BOLI policies of $86 thousand in 2022 and $814 thousand


was recognized$1.1 million in 2021. There were no death benefits on the life insurance policiesBOLI in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2020. We regularly monitor the financial information and credit ratings of our insurance carriers to ensure that they are credit worthy and comply with our policy.








82


Note 6:  Deposits


A stratification of time deposits at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is presented in the following table:
December 31,
(in thousands)20222021
Time deposits of less than or equal to $250 thousand$74,421 $96,214 
Time deposits of more than $250 thousand44,609 54,021 
Total time deposits$119,030 $150,235 
(in thousands)December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Time deposits of less than $100 thousand$39,361
$36,346
Time deposits of $100 thousand to $250 thousand68,391
66,092
Time deposits of more than $250 thousand52,364
49,025
Total time deposits$160,116
$151,463


Interest on time deposits was $576$323 thousand,, $743 $246 thousand and $853$554 thousand in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


Scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 20172022 are presented as follows:
(in thousands)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Scheduled time deposit maturities$87,011 $11,152 $8,898 $8,167 $3,801 $$119,030 
(in thousands)2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Scheduled maturities of time deposits$108,352
$13,000
$10,511
$18,976
$9,276
$1
$160,116


As of December 31, 2017, $107.82022, $231.3 million in securities held-to-maturity were pledged as collateral for our local agency deposits.


Our deposit portfolio includes deposits offered through the Promontory Interfinancial Network that are comprised of Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® ("CDARS") balances included in time deposits and Insured Cash Sweep® ("ICS") balances included in money market deposits. In addition, in 2016, we began offeringoffer deposits through Reich & Tang Deposit Networks, LLC, comprised of Demand Deposit MarketplaceSM ("DDM") balances, mostly in money market deposits.balances. Through these two networks we are able to offer our customers access to FDIC-insured deposit products in aggregate amounts exceeding current insurance limits. When we place funds through CDARS,ICS and DDM, on behalf of a customer, we have the option of receiving matching deposits through the network's reciprocal deposit program.program, or placing deposits "one-way" for which we receive no matching deposits. We consider the reciprocal deposits to be in-market deposits as distinguished from traditional out-of-market brokered deposits. We had $13.5 million and $15.1 million in CDARS and $41.0 million and $29.0 million in ICS balances inThe following table shows the reciprocal deposit programcomposition of our network deposits at December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively. In addition, we had $29.2 million and $36.4 million in DDM balances in the reciprocal deposit program at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We also have the ability to place deposits through the networks for which we receive no matching deposits ("one-way" deposits). One-way CDARS and ICS deposits totaled $4.2 million and $361 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2021.
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Reciprocal 1
One-Way 1
Reciprocal 1
One-Way 1
CDARS$11,031 $2,162 $21,413 $2,160 
ICS100,749 — — 110,900 
DDM62,219 — 52,365 60,000 
Total network deposits$173,999 $2,162 $73,778 $173,060 
1 Reciprocal deposits are on-balance-sheet while one-way deposits are off-balance-sheet.

The aggregate amount of deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loan balances was $224$247 thousand and $229$346 thousand at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Collectability of these overdrafts is subject to the same credit review process as other loans.


The Bank accepts deposits from shareholders, board of directors and employees in the normal course of business, and the terms are comparable to those with non-affiliated parties. The total deposits from board directors and their businesses, and executive officers were $29.9$11.2 million and $7.3$25.3 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


Note 7: Borrowings and Other Obligations

Federal Funds Purchased – The Bank had unsecured available lines of credit with correspondent banks for overnight borrowings totaling $100.4$150.0 million at both December 31, 2017 (including $8.4 million assumed from Bank of Napa)2022 and $92.0 million at December 31, 2016.2021.  In general, interest rates on these lines approximate the federal funds target rate. We hadThere were no overnight borrowings under these credit facilities at December 31, 20172022 and December 31, 2016.2021.
 
83


Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings – As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Bank had total lines of credit with the FHLB totaling $538.9of $711.6 million and $513.7$820.5 million, respectively, based on the eligible collateral of certain loans. There were no FHLBFHLB overnight borrowings at December 31, 2017 or 2016. On February 5, 2008, the Bank entered into a ten-year


borrowing agreement under the same FHLB line of credit for $15.02022 were $112.0 million at a fixed rate of 2.07%. On June 15, 2016, the Bank repaid the $15.0 million early and incurred4.65%, for a prepayment feenet available line of $312 thousand recorded in interest expense. At$599.6 million. There were no overnight borrowings at December 31, 2017 and 2016, $538.92021. As part of our acquisition of AMRB, we assumed FHLB fixed-rate advances totaling $13.9 million and $513.7that we early redeemed on August 25, 2021.

In February 2023, we increased our borrowing capacity at the FHLB by pledging certain held-to-maturity securities to Securities-Backed Credit Program, which increased our total FHLB borrowing capacity to $1.0372 billion as of February 28, 2023 from $711.6 million respectively, were remaining as available for borrowing from the FHLB.of December 31, 2022.

Federal Reserve Line of Credit – The Bank has aan available line of credit with the FRBSF secured by certain residential loans.  At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Bank had borrowing capacity under this line totaling $52.1$58.7 million and $43.1$70.8 million, respectively, and had no outstanding borrowings with the FRBSF.


Subordinated DebentureAs part of an acquisition in 2013, Bancorp assumed twoa subordinated debenturesdebenture with a contractual balance of $4.1 million due to NorCal Community Bancorp Trusts I andTrust II (the "Trusts""Trust"), established for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities on September 22, 2003 and December 29, 2005, respectively. Thesecurities. On March 15, 2021, Bancorp redeemed in full the $2.8 million (book value) subordinated debentures were recorded at fair values totaling $4.95 million at acquisition date with contractual values totaling $8.2 million. The difference between the contractual balance and the fair value at acquisition date is accreted into interest expense over the lives of the debentures. Accretion on the subordinated debentures totaled $153 thousand, $191 thousand and $210 thousand in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Bancorp has the option to defer payment of the interest on the subordinated debentures for a period of up to five years, as long as there is no default on the subordinated debentures. In the event of interest deferral, dividends to Bancorp common stockholders are prohibited. The trust preferred securities were sold and issued in private transactions pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Bancorp has guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, distributions and other payments due on trust preferred securities totaling $8.0 million issued by the Trusts, which have identical maturity, repricing and payment terms as the subordinated debentures.

The following is a summary of the contractual terms of the subordinated debenturesdebenture due to the TrustsTrust, which had a 251.5% effective rate in 2021, and included accelerated accretion of the $1.3 million remaining purchase discount due to the early redemption.

Other Obligations - Equipment finance lease liabilities totaling $439 thousand and $419 thousand at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, are included in borrowings and other obligations in the consolidated statements of condition. Refer to Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information.

The carrying values, and average balances and rates of borrowings and other obligations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017:
(in thousands) 
Subordinated debentures due to NorCal Community Bancorp Trust I on October 7, 2033 with interest payable quarterly, based on 3-month LIBOR plus 3.05%, repricing quarterly (4.41% as of December 31, 2017), redeemable, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date$4,124
Subordinated debentures due to NorCal Community Bancorp Trust II on March 15, 2036 with interest payable quarterly, based on 3-month LIBOR plus 1.40%, repricing quarterly (2.99% as of December 31, 2017), redeemable, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date4,124
   Total$8,248
Borrowings at December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 20162020 are summarized as follows:in the following table.
202220212020
(dollars in thousands)Carrying ValueAverage BalanceAverage RateCarrying ValueAverage BalanceAverage RateCarrying ValueAverage BalanceAverage Rate
FHLB overnight borrowings$112,000 $1,921 4.48 %$— $— — %$— $42 0.75 %
Other obligations (finance leases)$439 $374 0.65 %$419 $250 0.71 %$58 $132 2.62 %
FHLB fixed-rate advances$— $— — %$— $642 1.18 %$— $— — %
Subordinated debenture$— $— — %$— $534 251.54 %

$2,777 $2,741 5.68 %

 2017 2016 
(dollars in thousands)Carrying Value
Average Balance
Average Rate
 Carrying Value
Average Balance
Average Rate
 
FHLB overnight borrowings$
$1
1.75% $
$5,383
0.42% 
FHLB fixed-rate advances$
$
% $
$6,803
6.59%
1 
Subordinated debentures$5,739
$5,664
7.65% $5,586
$5,493
7.80% 
1 Average rate includes the impact of the $312 thousand prepayment fee in 2016 discussed above.

Note 8:  Stockholders' Equity and Stock Plans


Share-Based Awards


On May 11, 2010,12, 2020, our shareholders approved the 2020 Director Stock Plan, replacing and superseding the 2010 Director Stock Plan to pay(collectively "the Plan"). The Plan provides for the payment of director fees in common shares of BancorpBancorp's common stock upnot to 150,000 shares. In additionexceed 250,000 shares and a way for directors to cash compensation,purchase shares at fair market value. During 2022, 2021 and 2020 we issued 2,878, 4,60710,145, 6,443 and 5,2955,723 shares of common under the 2010 Director Stock Plan to directors in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.stock, respectively, for director fees. As of December 31, 2017, 110,4332022, 228,004 shares were available for future grants under this plan.director fees and purchases.


On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors adopted theThe 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective July 1, 2017, which replaced the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the plan,("ESPP") gives our employees mayan opportunity to purchase BancorpBancorp's common shares through payroll deductions of between one percent and fifteen percent of pay in each pay period.their pay. Shares are purchased quarterly at a five percent discount from the closing market price on the last day of the quarter.


Of the 200,000 common As of December 31, 2022, 375,450 shares set aside for employee purchases, there were 192,453 shares available for future grantspurchases under the plan as of December 31, 2017. Shares purchased under the 2017 plan are restricted until the plan is approved by our shareholders.ESPP.


On March 17, 2017, the Board of Directors approvedUnder the 2017 Equity Plan, which was affirmed by Bancorp's shareholders on May 16, 2017 and replaced the 2007 Equity Plan. As of the 2017 Equity Plan's effective date, there were 118,668 shares of common stock available for future grants to employees, advisors and non-employee directors. As of December 31, 2017, there were 108,981 shares available for future grants under the 2017 Equity Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretion to determine, among other things, which employees, advisors and non-employee directors will receive an award,share-based awards, the number and timing of awards, the vesting schedule for each award, and the type of award to be granted, the numbergranted. As of shares of Bancorp stockDecember 31, 2022, there were 819,487 shares available for future grants to be subject to each optionemployees, advisors and restricted stock award, and any other terms and conditions.

non-employee directors. Options are issued at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the stock at the date of grant. Options and restricted stock awardedgranted to officers and employees during 2006 through 2014generally vest 20%by one-third on each anniversary of the grant date for five
84


three years and expire ten years from the grant date. Options granted to non-employee directors prior to 2016 vest 20% immediately and 20% on each anniversary of the grant date for four years and expire seven years from the grant date. In general, options granted after 2014 for employees and after 2015 for non-employee directors generally vest by one-third on each anniversary of the grant for three years and expire ten years from the grant date. Options issued as replacement awards in connection with the Bank of Napa acquisition were fully vested as part of the merger agreement with Bank of Napa.

Stock options and restricted stock may be net settled in a cashless exercise by a reduction in the number of shares otherwise deliverable upon exercise or vesting in satisfaction of the exercise payment andand/or applicable tax withholding requirements. During 2017, we withheld 12,208 shares totaling $801 thousand at a weighted-average price of $65.63 for cashless stock option exercises. There were no stock options exercised under net settlement arrangements in 2016 or 2015. Shares withheld under net settlement arrangements are available for future grants. The table below depicts the total number of shares, amount, and weighted average price withheld for cashless exercises in each of the respective years.

December 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Number of shares withheld11,505 27,929 10,001 
Total amount withheld (in thousands)$393 $1,085 $398 
Weighted-average price$34.13 $38.85 $39.83 
Beginning in 2015, performance-based
Performance-based stock awards were(restricted stock) are issued to a selected group of employees.employees under the 2017 Equity Plan. Stock award vesting is contingent upon the achievement of pre-established long-term performance goals set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Performance is measured over a three-year period and cliff vested. These performance-based stock awards were granted at a maximum opportunity level, and based on the achievement of the pre-established goals, the actual payouts can range from 0% to 200% of the target award. For performance-based stock awards, an estimate is made of the number of shares expected to vest based on the probability that the performance criteria will be achieved to determine the amount of compensation expense to be recognized. The estimate is re-evaluated quarterly and total compensation expense is adjusted for any change in the current period.


A summary of activity for stock optionsoption activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 20152020 is presented below.in the following table. The intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable is calculated as the number of in-the-money options times the difference between the market price of our stock as of each year-end presented and the exercise prices of the in-the-money options.options as of each year-end period presented.

Number of SharesWeighted Average Exercise Price Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair ValueWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2019417,382 $28.01 $7,112 5.50
Granted44,632 39.18 6.84 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited(17,222)40.31 
Exercised(73,208)22.26 1,370 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2020371,584 29.92 2,262 5.12
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2020315,377 28.05 2,254 4.53
Options outstanding at December 31, 2020371,584 29.92 2,262 5.12
Granted55,861 36.39 8.84 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited(2,008)42.50 
Exercised(60,056)23.01 885 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2021365,381 31.97 2,326 5.57
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2021315,744 30.85 2,264 5.15
Options outstanding at December 31, 2021365,381 31.97 2,326 5.57
Granted39,094 34.16 8.49 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited(23,760)37.48 
Exercised(51,010)23.01 617 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2022329,705 33.22 813 5.59
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2022287,228 32.81 813 5.15


 Number of Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)

Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2014194,672
$35.14
$3,398


4.48
Granted28,320
50.70


$12.21
 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited(652)48.38




 
Exercised(37,071)30.72
755


 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015185,269
38.35
2,788


5.00
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2015114,581
34.12
2,209


3.21
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015185,269
38.35
2,788


5.00
Granted32,637
49.37


10.11
 
Exercised(36,117)33.98
661


 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016181,789
41.20
5,190


5.77
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2016103,211
36.65
3,416


4.18
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016181,789
41.20
5,190


5.77
Granted 1
100,664
39.78


32.61
 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited(2,011)43.97




 
Exercised(21,474)38.62
585


 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017258,968
40.84
7,075


5.34
Exercisable (vested) at December 31, 2017192,172
35.69
6,212


4.42
1 Includes 70,145 replacement stock option awards issuedA summary of the options outstanding and exercisable by price range as of December 31, 2022 is presented in the Acquisition with a $27.20 weighted average exercise price and a $40.71 weighted average grant-date fair value. See Note 18, Acquisition.following table:

85


Stock Options Outstanding as of December 31, 2022 Stock Options Exercisable as of December 31, 2022
Range of Exercise PricesStock Options OutstandingRemaining Contractual Life (in years)Weighted Average Exercise PriceStock Options ExercisableWeighted Average Exercise Price
$10.00 - $20.0010,852 0.4$19.69 10,852 $19.69 
$20.01 - $30.0078,214 2.5$24.64 78,214 $24.64 
$30.01 - $40.00175,929 6.9$34.58 139,906 $34.41 
$40.01 - $50.0064,710 6.6$42.17 58,256 $42.40 
329,705 287,228 

The following table summarizes non-vested restricted stock awards and changes during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 2015.2020.
Number of SharesWeighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested awards at December 31, 201970,066 37.81 
Granted29,100 40.10 
Vested(23,524)36.35 
Cancelled or forfeited(14,314)37.63 
Non-vested awards at December 31, 202061,328 39.50 
Granted30,742 38.00 
Vested(26,392)36.81 
Cancelled or forfeited(3,848)33.96 
Non-vested awards at December 31, 202161,830 40.25 
Granted46,672 34.03 
Vested(12,444)41.49 
Cancelled or forfeited(13,692)41.80 
Non-vested awards at December 31, 202282,366 36.28 
 Number of Shares
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested awards at December 31, 201422,423
$41.25
  Granted15,970
50.75
  Vested(6,555)40.00
  Forfeited(450)48.45
Non-vested awards at December 31, 201531,388
46.24
  Granted16,910
49.65
  Vested(8,599)44.14
Non-vested awards at December 31, 201639,699
48.15
  Granted16,230
69.59
  Vested(10,321)45.78
Non-vested awards at December 31, 201745,608
56.31

A summary of the options outstanding and exercisable by price range as of December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table:
 Stock Options Outstanding as of December 31, 2017  Stock Options Exercisable as of December 31, 2017
Range of Exercise PricesStock Options Outstanding
Remaining Contractual Life (in years)Weighted Average Exercise Price
 Stock Options Exercisable
Weighted Average Exercise Price
$10.00 - $20.0014,120
2.1$17.74
 14,120
$17.74
$20.01 - $30.0051,731
1.126.05
 51,731
26.05
$30.01 - $40.0070,363
5.335.53
 68,238
35.41
$40.01 - $50.0064,511
7.146.14
 33,224
44.73
$50.01 - $60.0027,724
6.950.70
 18,200
50.70
$60.01 - $70.0030,519
9.368.68
 6,659
65.46
 258,968



 192,172






We determine the fair value of stock options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model that takes into account the stock price at the grant date, the exercise price, and the following assumptions (weighted-average shown).
Years ended December 31,
202220212020
Risk-free interest rate1.86 %0.98 %0.91 %
Expected dividend yield on common stock2.85 %2.57 %2.38 %
Expected life in years6.06.16.1
Expected price volatility33.44 %33.12 %24.43 %
 Years ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Risk-free interest rate1.66%1.37%1.67%
Expected dividend yield on common stock1.70%2.02%1.75%
Expected life in years2.4
6.0
6.0
Expected price volatility25.58%25.56%28.06%


The fair value of stock options onas of the grant date is recorded as a stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, with a corresponding increase in common stock. Stock-based compensation also includes compensation expense related to the issuance of restricted stock awards. The grant-date fair value of the restricted stock awards, which equals intrinsic value on thatthe grant date price, is being recorded as compensation expense over the requisite service period with a corresponding increase in common stock as the shares vest. Stock option and restricted stock awards issued include a retirement eligibility clause whereby the requisite service period is satisfied at the retirement eligibility date. For those awards, we accelerate the recording of stock-based compensation when the award holder is eligible to retire. However, retirement eligibility does not affect the vesting of restricted stock or the exercisability of the stock options, which are based on the scheduled vesting period. Total compensation costexpense for these share-based payment arrangementsstock options and restricted stock awards was $1.3 million, $994$962 thousand, $972 thousand, and $636 thousand$1.2 million during 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 2015,2020, respectively, and the total recognized deferred tax benefits related thereto were $293$257 thousand, $318$213 thousand, and $194$341 thousand, respectively.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, there was $1.5$1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and restricted stock awards. This costawards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
86


period of approximately 2.1 years. The total grant-date fair value of stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 20152020 was $449$356 thousand, $282$514 thousand, and $202$484 thousand,, respectively. The total grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards vested during 2017, 20162022, 2021, and 20152020 was $473$431 thousand, $380 thousand$1.0 million, and $262 thousand,$1.2 million, respectively.


We adopted ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting effective January 1, 2017 as discussed in Note 1, which requires us to record excess tax benefits (deficiencies) resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options, the disqualifying disposition of incentive stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards as income tax benefits (expense) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income with a corresponding decrease (increase) to current taxes payable. For the year ended December 31, 2017,In 2022, 2021, and 2020 we recognized $214$3 thousand, $87 thousand, and $120 thousand, respectively, in excess tax benefits recorded as a reduction to income tax expense related to these types of transactions. Prior to the adoption of this ASU, excess tax benefits (deficiencies) were recognized as an increase (decrease) to common stock in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity. The tax benefits realized from disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options were recognized in tax expense to the extent of the book compensation cost recorded. Total tax benefits from disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options recognized during 2016 and 2015 were $70 thousand and $49 thousand, respectively.


Dividends
 
Presented below is a summary of cash dividends paid in 2022, 2021 and 2020 to common shareholders, recorded as a reduction offrom retained earnings. On January 19, 2018,20, 2023, the Board of Directors declared a $0.25 per share cash dividend, of $0.29 per share, payable onpaid February 9, 201810, 2023 to the shareholders of record at the close of business on February 2, 2018.3, 2023.
Years ended December 31, Years ended December 31,
(in thousands except per share data)2017
2016
2015
(in thousands except per share data)202220212020
Cash dividends to common stockholders$6,896
$6,223
$5,390
Cash dividends to common stockholders$15,673 $13,107 $12,506 
Cash dividends per common share$1.12
$1.02
$0.90
Cash dividends per common share$0.98 $0.94 $0.92 
 
The holders of unvested restricted stock awards and performance-based stock awards are entitled to dividends on the same per-share ratio as holders of common stock. Upon the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, taxTax benefits onfor dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards are recorded as tax benefits in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income with a corresponding decrease to current taxes payable. Dividends on forfeited awards are included in stock-based compensation expense. Prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, tax benefits on dividends were recognized as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity.




Under the California Corporations Code, payment of dividends by Bancorp to its shareholders is restricted to the amount of retained earnings immediately prior to the distribution or the amount of assets that exceeds the total liabilities immediately after the distribution. As of December 31, 2017,2022, Bancorp's retained earnings and the amount of total assets that exceeds the total liabilities were $155.5$270.8 million and $297.0$412.1 million, respectively.


Under the California Financial Code, payment of dividends by the Bank to Bancorp is restricted to the lesser of retained earnings or the amount of undistributed net profits of the Bank from the three most recent fiscal years. Under this restriction, approximately $39.9$20.1 million of the Bank's retained earnings balance was available for payment of dividends to Bancorp as of December 31, 2017.2022. Bancorp held $3.2$4.5 million in cash at December 31, 2017. This cash, combined with the $39.9 million dividends available to be distributed from the Bank, is expected to be adequate to cover Bancorp's estimated operational needs and cash dividends to shareholders for 2018.2022.


Preferred Stock and Shareholder Rights PlanShare Repurchase Program


On July 6, 2017,16, 2021, Bancorp adoptedBoard of Directors approved a new shareholder rights agreement (“Rights Agreement”),share repurchase program under which replaced the existing Rights Agreement that expired on July 23, 2017. The Rights Agreement, which expires on July 23, 2022, is designedBancorp could repurchase up to discourage takeovers that involve abusive tactics or do not provide fair value to shareholders. The Rights Agreement defines the percentage$25.0 million of share ownership of an "acquiring person" as 10% of theits outstanding common shares. Each right entitlesstock through July 31, 2023. On October 22, 2021, Bancorp's Board of Directors approved an amendment to the registered holdercurrent share repurchase program, which increased the total authorization from $25.0 million to purchase from$57.0 million and left the expiration date unchanged. The last activity under the program was in the first quarter of 2022 when the Bancorp one one-hundredthrepurchased 23,273 shares totaling $877 thousand. A total of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value, of Bancorp at an initial price of $90 per one one-hundredth of a preferred share, subject$34.7 million remained available to adjustment uponrepurchase under the occurrence of certain events. Asprogram as of December 31, 2017,2022.

Under the Share Repurchase Program, Bancorp was authorized to issue five millionmay purchase shares of preferredits common stock through various means such as open market transactions, including block purchases, and privately negotiated transactions. The number of shares repurchased and the timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined at Bancorp's discretion. Factors include, but are not limited to, stock price, trading volume and general market conditions, along with no par value, one million shares of which have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, with no par value under the Rights Agreement. In the event of a proposed merger, tender offerBancorp’s general business conditions. The program may be suspended or other attempt to gain control of Bancorp that the Board of Directorsdiscontinued at any time and does not approve, the Board of Directors may authorize the issuanceobligate Bancorp to acquire any specific number of shares of its common or preferred stock that would impede the completion of such a transaction. An effectstock.

87


As part of the possible issuance of common or preferred stock, therefore, may be to deterShare Repurchase Program, Bancorp entered into a future takeover attempt. The Board of Directors has no present plans or understandings for the issuance of any common or preferred stocktrading plan adopted in connectionaccordance with the Rights Agreement.

Warrant

Under the United States DepartmentRule 10b5-1 of the Treasury Capital Purchase Program (the “TCPP”), Bancorp issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 154,242 sharesSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The 10b5-1 trading plan permits common stock to be repurchased at a per share exercisetimes that might otherwise be prohibited under insider trading laws or self-imposed trading restrictions. The 10b5-1 trading plan is administered by an independent broker and is subject to price, of $27.23. The warrant was immediately exercisablemarket volume and was subsequently auctioned to two institutional investors in November 2011. The warrant, as adjusted, represented the right to purchase 157,711 shares of common stock at $26.63 per share when it was exercised in September 2015 and the cashless exercise resulted in the issuance of 70,591 shares of common stock.timing restrictions.




Note 9:  Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
 
Fair Value Hierarchy and Fair Value Measurement
 
We group our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value ininto three levels within the fair value hierarchy, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
 
Level 1: Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2: Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuations for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
 
Level 3: Valuations are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Values are determined using pricing models and discounted cash flow models and may include significant Managementmanagement judgment and estimation.


Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized through our monthly and/or quarterly valuation process in the reporting period during which the event or circumstances that caused the transfer occurred. No such transfers occurred in the years presented.


The following table summarizes our assets and liabilities that were required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
88


(in thousands)
Description of Financial Instruments
Carrying Value
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(in thousands)

Description of Financial Instruments
Carrying ValueQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Measurement Categories: Changes in Fair Value Recorded In1
December 31, 2017   
December 31, 2022December 31, 2022   
Securities available for sale:   Securities available for sale:   
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government agencies$188,061
$
$188,061
$
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored agenciesMortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored agencies$475,505 $— $475,505 $— OCI
SBA-backed securities$25,982
$
$25,817
$165
SBA-backed securities$44,355 $— $44,355 $— OCI
Debentures of government sponsored agencies$12,938
$
$12,938
$
Debentures of government sponsored agencies$135,106 $— $135,106 $— OCI
Privately-issued collateralized mortgage obligations$1,431
$
$1,431
$
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities$10,269 $10,269 $— $— OCI
Obligations of state and political subdivisions$97,491
$
$97,491
$
Obligations of state and political subdivisions$102,123 $— $102,123 $— OCI
Corporate bonds$6,564
$
$6,564
$
Corporate bonds$33,276 $— $33,276 $— OCI
Asset-backed securitiesAsset-backed securities$1,462 $— $1,462 $— OCI
Derivative financial assets (interest rate contracts)$74
$
$74
$
Derivative financial assets (interest rate contracts)$602 $— $602 $— NI
Derivative financial liabilities (interest rate contracts)$740
$
$740
$
December 31, 2016 
  
 
December 31, 2021December 31, 2021   
Securities available for sale: 
  
 
Securities available for sale:  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government agencies$253,434
$
$253,434
$
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored agenciesMortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored agencies$759,576 $— $759,576 $— OCI
SBA-backed securities$607
$
$
$607
SBA-backed securities$33,478 $— $33,478 $— OCI
Debentures of government sponsored agencies$35,403
$
$35,403
$
Debentures of government sponsored agencies$188,527 $— $188,527 $— OCI
Privately-issued collateralized mortgage obligations$419
$
$419
$
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities$11,630 $11,630 $— $— OCI
Obligations of state and political subdivisions$77,701
$
$77,701
$
Obligations of state and political subdivisions$134,000 $— $134,000 $— OCI
Corporate bonds$5,016
$
$5,016
$
Corporate bonds$38,495 $— $38,495 $— OCI
Derivative financial assets (interest rate contracts)$55
$
$55
$
Asset-backed securitiesAsset-backed securities$1,862 $— $1,862 $— OCI
Derivative financial liabilities (interest rate contracts)$933
$
$933
$
Derivative financial liabilities (interest rate contracts)$1,085 $— $1,085 $— NI
1Other comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI") or net income ("NI").
Securities available-for-sale
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. When available, quoted market prices (Level 1) are used to determine the fair value of available-for-sale securities. Level 1 securities available-for-sale.include U.S. Treasury securities. If quoted market prices are not available, we obtain pricing information from a reputable third-party service provider, who may utilize valuation techniques that


use current market-based or independently sourced parameters, such as bid/ask prices, dealer-quoted prices, interest rates, benchmark yield curves, prepayment speeds, probability of default, loss severity and credit spreads (Level 2).   Level 2 securities include asset-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, U.S. agencies or government-sponsored agencies' debt securities, mortgage-backed securities, government agency-issued, privately-issued collateralized mortgage obligations and corporate bonds. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, there were no securities that were considered Level 1 securities. As of December 31, 2017, we have one available-for-sale security that is considered a Level 3 security. The security is a U.S. government agency obligation collateralized by a small number of business equipment loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration ("SBA") program. This security is not actively traded and is owned only by a few investors. The significant unobservable data that is reflected in the fair value measurement include dealer quotes, projected prepayment speeds/average life and credit information, among other things. The unrealized loss on this SBA-guaranteed security decreased by $6 thousand in 2017 recorded as part of other comprehensive income.securities.


Securities held-to-maturityHeld-to-maturity securities may be written down to fair value (determined using the same techniques discussed above for securities available-for-sale) as a result of an other-than-temporary impairment, and we did not record any write-downs during 20172022 or 2016.2021. Fair value of held-to-maturity securities is determined using the same techniques discussed above for available-for-sale securities.


On a recurring basis, derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value, which is based on the income approach using observable Level 2 market inputs, reflecting market expectations of future interest rates as of the measurement date.  Standard valuation techniques are used to calculate the present value of the future expected cash flows assuming an orderly transaction.  Valuation adjustments may be made to reflect both our own credit risk and the counterparties’ credit risk in determining the fair value of the derivatives. Level 2 inputs for the valuations are limited to observable market prices for London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and Overnight Index Swap ("OIS") rates (for the very short term), quoted prices for LIBOR futures contracts, observable market prices for LIBOR and OIS swap rates, and one-month and three-month LIBOR basis spreads at commonly quoted intervals. Mid-market pricing of the inputs is used as a practical expedient in the fair value measurements. We project spot rates at reset days specified by each swap contract to determine future cash flows, then discount to
89


present value using either LIBOR or OIS curves depending on whether the swap positions are fully collateralized as of the measurement date. When the value of any collateral placed with counterparties is less than the interest rate derivative liability, a credit valuation adjustment ("CVA") is applied to reflect the credit risk we pose to counterparties. We have used the spread between the Standard & Poor's BBB rated U.S. Bank Composite rate and LIBOR for the closest maturity term corresponding to the duration of the swaps to derive the CVA. A similar credit risk adjustment, correlated to the credit standing of the counterparty, is made when collateral posted by the counterparty does not fully cover their liability to the Bank.us. For further discussion on our methodology in valuing our derivative financial instruments, refer to Note 14, Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities.Activities.
 
Certain financial assets may be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets can beare subject to fair value adjustments that result from the application of the lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets, such as impairedanalyzed loans that are collateral dependent and other real estate owned ("OREO"). In addition, assets

OREO represents collateral acquired or liabilities assumed from business combinations are measuredthrough foreclosure and is initially recorded at fair value as established by a current appraisal of the collateral. Subsequent to foreclosure, OREO is carried at the datelower of acquisition. Refer to Note 18 for details ofcost or fair value, measurement usedless estimated costs to sell. OREO values are reviewed on an ongoing basis and any subsequent decline in association with business combinations.fair value is recorded as a foreclosed asset expense in the current period. The value of OREO is classified as Level 3. Our current OREO resulted from the American River Bankshares ("AMRB") merger in 2021.


The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and that were held in the consolidated statements of condition at each respective period end, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.
(in thousands)Carrying ValueQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs 
(Level 3)
December 31, 2022
Other real estate owned$455 $— $— $455 
December 31, 2021
Other real estate owned$800 $— $— $800 
(in thousands)
Description of Financial Instruments
Carrying Value
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs 
(Level 3)

December 31, 2017  
 
 
None$
$
$
$
December 31, 2016 
 
 
 
Other real estate$408
$
$
$408


When a loan is identified as impaired, it is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, measured based on the loan's observable market price (Level 1) or the current net realizable value of the underlying collateral securing the loan, if the loan is collateral dependent (Level 3).  Net realizable value of the underlying collateral is the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs and any prior liens. Appraisals, recent comparable sales, offers and listing prices are factored in when valuing the collateral. We review and verify the qualifications and licenses of the certified general appraisers used for appraising commercial properties or certified residential appraisers for residential properties. Real estate appraisals may utilize a combination of approaches including replacement cost, sales comparison and the income approach. Comparable sales and income data are analyzed by the appraisers and adjusted to reflect differences between them and the subject property such as property characteristics, leasing status and physical condition. When appraisals are received, Management reviews the underlying assumptions and methodology utilized, as well as the overall resulting value in conjunction with independent data sources such as recent market data and industry-wide statistics. We generally use a 6% discount for selling costs which is applied to all properties, regardless of size. Appraised values may be adjusted to reflect changes in market conditions that have occurred subsequent to the appraisal date, or for revised estimates regarding the timing or cost of the property sale. These adjustments are based on qualitative judgments made by Management on a case-by-case basis and are generally unobservable valuation inputs as they are specific to the underlying collateral. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during 2017.

OREO represents collateral acquired through foreclosure and is initially recorded at fair value as established by a current appraisal, adjusted for disposition costs. Subsequently, OREO is measured at lower of cost or fair value. OREO values are reviewed on an ongoing basis and any subsequent decline in fair value is recorded as a foreclosed asset expense in the current period. The value of OREO is determined based on independent appraisals, similar to the process used for impaired loans, discussed above, and is classified as Level 3. All OREO had been acquired through business combinations and were sold as of December 31, 2017.


Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The table below is a summary of fair value estimates for financial instruments as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (summarized in the first table in this note). The carrying amounts in the following table are recorded in the consolidated statements of condition under the indicated captions. Further, we have not disclosed the fair value of financial instruments specifically excluded from disclosure requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic of the Codification (ASC 825-10-50-8), such as BOLI.bank-owned life insurance policies ("BOLI"), lease obligations and non-maturity deposit liabilities. Additionally, we holdheld shares of FHLBFederal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of San Francisco stock and Visa Inc. Class B common stock, both recorded at cost. These shares are restrictedcost, as there was no impairment or changes resulting from resaleobservable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer as of December 31, 2022 and their2021. See further discussion on values were discussed inwithin Note 2, Investment Securities, above.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in thousands)Carrying AmountsFair ValueFair Value HierarchyCarrying AmountsFair ValueFair Value Hierarchy
Financial assets (recorded at amortized cost)   
Cash and cash equivalents$45,424 $45,424 Level 1$347,641 $347,641 Level 1
Investment securities held-to-maturity972,207 845,239 Level 2342,222 342,755 Level 2
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses2,069,563 1,993,866 Level 32,232,622 2,234,430 Level 3
Interest receivable13,069 13,069 Level 211,889 11,889 Level 2
Financial liabilities (recorded at amortized cost)   
Time deposits119,030 118,333 Level 2150,235 150,475 Level 2
Federal Home Loan Bank overnight borrowings112,000 112,000 Level 1— — Level 1
Interest payable75 75 Level 281 81 Level 2
90


 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(in thousands)Carrying Amounts
Fair Value
Fair Value Hierarchy Carrying Amounts
Fair Value
Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$203,545
$203,545
Level 1 $48,804
$48,804
Level 1
Investment securities held-to-maturity151,032
151,032
Level 2 44,438
45,097
Level 2
Loans, net1,663,246
1,650,198
Level 3 1,471,174
1,473,360
Level 3
Interest receivable7,501
7,501
Level 2 6,319
6,319
Level 2
Financial liabilities: 
 
   
 
 
Deposits2,148,670
2,148,050
Level 2 1,772,700
1,773,102
Level 2
Subordinated debentures5,739
5,118
Level 3 5,586
5,083
Level 3
Interest payable191
191
Level 2 134
134
Level 2

Following is a description of methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument not recorded at fair value but required for disclosure purposes:
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
Held-to-maturity Securities - Held-to-maturity securities, which generally consist of obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate bonds, are recorded at their amortized cost. Their fair value for disclosure purposes is


determined using methodologies similar to those described above for available-for-sale securities using Level 2 inputs. If Level 2 inputs are not available, we may utilize pricing models that incorporate unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities (Level 3).  As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not hold any held-to-maturity securities whose fair value was measured using significant unobservable inputs.
Loans - The fairFair value of loans with variable interest rates approximates their current carrying value, because their ratesis based on exit price techniques and obtained from an independent third party that uses its proprietary valuation model and methodology and may differ from actual price from a prospective buyer. The discounted cash flow valuation approach reflects key inputs and assumptions that are regularly adjusted to currentunobservable, such as loan probability of default, loss given default, prepayment speed, and market discount rates. The fair
Fair value of fixed rate loans or variable loans at negotiated interest rate floors or ceilings with remaining maturities in excess of one year is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar creditworthiness and similar remaining maturities. The allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) is considered to be a reasonable estimate of the portion of loan discount attributable to credit risks.
Interest Receivable and Payable - The interest receivable and payable balances approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of their settlement dates.

Deposits - The fair value of deposits without stated maturity, such as transaction accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts, is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value offixed-rate time deposits is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect the current observable market rates offered for time deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Subordinated Debentures - The fair values of the subordinated debentures were estimated by discounting the future cash flows (interest payment at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.05% and 1.40%) to their present values using current market rates at which similar bonds would be issued with similar credit ratings as ours and similar remaining maturities. Each interest payment was discounted at the spot rate of the corresponding term, determined based on the yields and terms of comparable trust preferred securities, plus a liquidity premium. In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law and limits the ability of certain bank holding companies to treat trust preferred security debt issuances as Tier 1 capital. This law effectively closed the trust-preferred securities markets for new issuances and led to the absence of observable or comparable transactions in the market place. Due to the use of unobservable inputs of trust preferred securities, we consider the fair value to be a Level 3 measurement. See Note 7, Borrowings for further information.

Commitments - The value of unrecognizedoff-balance-sheet financial instruments is estimated based on the fee income associated with the commitments, which in the absence of credit exposure, is considered to approximate their settlement value. The fair value of commitment fees was not material as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.2021.


Note 10: Benefit Plans


In 2003, weDeferred Compensation Plans

We established a Deferred Compensation Plan, thatwhich allows certain key Managementmanagement personnel designated by the Board of Directors of the Bank to defer up to 80% of their salary and 100% of their annual bonus. The plan was amended in 2007 in order to comply with the most recent Internal Revenue Code Section 409A changes. Under the amended plan, amountsAmounts deferred earn interest that is equal to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, on the first business day of the year, which was 3.75% on January 1, 2017, 3.50% on January 1, 2016 and 3.25% on January 1, 2015. 2022 and January 1, 2021.

As part of the acquisition of AMRB in August 2021, we assumed $2.9 million of deferred compensation plans for former members of AMRB's management team and non-employee directors. Prior to January 1, 2022, amounts deferred earned interest based on the 5-year U.S. Government Treasury rate plus 4.0%. This rate was 4.36% for 2021. Beginning January 1, 2022, the rate converted to the prime rate.

A similar Deferred Director Fee Plan, which allows members of the Board of Directors to defer the cash portion of their director compensation, went into effect on January 1, 2021, and the first deferral of their fees was in July 2021.

Our deferred compensation obligation under these plans totaled $3.4$7.1 millionand$3.2 $7.9 million at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and is included in interest payable and other liabilities.


401(k) Defined Contribution Plan

Our 401(k) Defined Contribution Plan, which includes a Roth 401(k) option (the “401(k) Plan”) commenced in May 1990 and, is available to all regular employees at least eighteen years of age who complete ninety days of service, and enter the plan during one of the four open enrollment dates (January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1) of each year. Under the 401(k) Plan, employees can defer between 1% and 50% of their eligible compensation, up to the maximum amount allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the employer match are vested at a rateThe Bank provides employer-match of 20% per year over a five year period. In 2015 and 2016, the Bank matched 60% of each participant's contribution, with a maximum of $4 thousand of matching contribution per participant per year. In 2017, the Bank increased the match to 70% of each participant's contribution, with a maximum of $5 thousand of matching contribution per participant per year. Employer matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan vest at a rate of 20% per year over five years, per plan provisions. Employer contributions totaled $765$949 thousand, $589$991 thousand and $555$929 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively.2020, respectively, and are recorded as part of salaries and benefits expense.




In 1999, the 401(k) Plan was amended to include an employee stock ownership component and was renamed the Bank of Marin Employee Stock Ownership and SavingsPlan

Our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”). Under is also available to all employees under the termssame eligibility criteria of the Plan, as amended, the401(k) Plan; however, employee contributions are not permitted. The Board of Directors determines a specific portion of the Bank's profits to be contributed to the employee stock ownership each year either in common stock or in cash for the purchase of Bancorp stock to be allocated to all eligible employees based on a percentage of their salaries, regardless of whether an employee is participating in the 401(k) plan or not. In January 2010, the Bank of Marin Employee Stock Ownership and Savings Plan was split into two plans: Bank of Marin 401(k) Plan and Bank of Marin Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"). The same eligibility criteria apply under the ESOP, while employees' contributions are not permitted. For all participants, employer contributions vest over a five yearfive-year service period, of service.per plan provisions. After five years of service, all employer contributions vest immediately. The Bank of Marin 401(k) Plan was amended in early 2016 to incorporate recent changes in the pension laws, and was amended again in November 2016 to include a Roth 401(k) option.


The Bank contributed cash in the amount of $1.2 million in 2016 and $1.1 million in 2015 to the ESOP, which purchased Bancorp stock at market prices. Starting in 2017, Bancorp issued shares of common stock, and contributed them to the ESOP and recognized $1.2expenses of $1.6 million in expense,2022 and $1.3 million in 2021 and 2020, based on the quoted market price on the date of contribution. Cash dividends paid on Bancorpstock held by the ESOP are used to purchase additional shares in the open market.All
91


shares of Bancorp stock held by the ESOP are included in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share. The employer contributions to the ESOP and the 401(k) Plan are included in salaries and benefits expense.


On January 1, 2011, we established a Salary Continuation Plan

A Salary Continuation Plan was established for a select group of Executive Management,executive management, who, upon retirement, will receive twenty-five percent of their estimated salary at retirement as salary continuation benefit payments upon retirement.that are fixed and will be made between five to fifteen years, depending on the executives' service period at the Bank.  Each participant will need to participate in this plan for five years before vesting begins. After five years, the participant will vest ratably in the benefit over the remaining period until age 65. This Plan isAs part of previous acquisitions, we assumed the salary continuation agreements for former executive officers and directors. These plans are unfunded and nonqualified for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. As part of the acquisition of Bank of Napa in November 2017, we assumed

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, our total liability under the salary continuation agreements for four former executive officers of Bank of Napa. Under these agreements, fixed annual retirement benefit payments will be made for ten years beginning the first day of the month following the executive reaching the age of 65. At December 31, 2017plans was $4.7 million and 2016, respectively, our liability under the Salary Continuation Plan was $2.5 million (including $1.2 million assumed from Bank of Napa) and $1.0$5.3 million recorded in interest payable and other liabilities.


Note 11: Income Taxes


The current and deferred components of the income tax provision for each of the three years ended December 31 are as follows:
(in thousands)202220212020
Current tax provision
Federal$10,670 $6,627 $7,108 
State6,687 4,815 4,895 
Total current tax provision17,357 11,442 12,003 
Deferred tax (benefit) provision
Federal(441)274 (964)
State(58)(694)
Total deferred tax (benefit) provision(434)216 (1,658)
Total income tax provision$16,923 $11,658 $10,345 
(in thousands)2017
2016
2015
Current tax provision   
Federal$5,379
$9,710
$7,097
State2,623
3,794
2,931
Total current8,002
13,504
10,028
Deferred tax provision (benefit)   
Federal4,444
(206)382
State416
48
80
Total deferred4,860
(158)462
Total income tax provision$12,862
$13,346
$10,490


On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law. The law reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the Bank has valued all of its deferred tax assets and liabilities at the 21% rate. The adjustment to the net deferred tax assets valuation as of December 22, 2017 was $3.0 million and has been recorded in the provision for income taxes in the fourth quarter of 2017.




The following table shows the tax effect of our cumulative temporary differences as of December 31:
(in thousands)20222021
Deferred tax assets:
Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale$29,458 $— 
Operating and finance lease liabilities8,002 7,642 
Allowance for credit losses on loans and unfunded loan commitments7,229 7,335 
Deferred compensation and salary continuation plans3,481 3,911 
Accrued but unpaid expenses1,751 1,884 
State franchise tax1,396 930 
Net operating loss carryforwards1,239 1,406 
Fair value adjustment on acquired loans905 894 
Stock-based compensation697 599 
Depreciation and disposals on premises and equipment236 188 
Other194 144 
  Total gross deferred tax assets54,588 24,933 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Operating and finance lease right-of-use assets(7,465)(7,098)
Core deposit intangible assets(1,512)(1,953)
Deferred loan origination costs and fees(1,476)(1,526)
Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale— (745)
Other(279)(292)
  Total gross deferred tax liabilities(10,732)(11,614)
Net deferred tax assets$43,856 $13,319 

92


(in thousands)2017
2016
Deferred tax assets:  
Allowance for loan losses and off-balance sheet credit commitments$4,945
$6,871
Net operating loss carryforwards2,629
3,582
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale1,405
2,543
Deferred compensation plan and salary continuation plan1,744
1,773
State franchise tax557
1,300
Accrued but unpaid expenses212
1,251
Fair value adjustment on acquired loans570
799
Deferred rent and other lease incentives328
547
Depreciation and disposals on premises and equipment632
528
Other real estate owned
448
Stock-based compensation463
398
Interest received on non-accrual loans130
185
Other266
196
  Total gross deferred tax assets13,881
20,421
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Deferred loan origination costs and fees(2,153)(2,784)
Unaccreted discount on subordinated debentures(742)(1,119)
Core deposit intangible asset(1,919)(1,085)
Accretion on investment securities(56)(54)
Other(221)(42)
  Total gross deferred tax liabilities(5,091)(5,084)
Net deferred tax assets$8,790
$15,337

As of December 31, 2017, federal and2022, California net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") of $5.1$14.5 million and $18.1 million, respectively, corresponded to the total $2.6$1.2 million deferred tax asset above. If not fully utilized, the federal NOLs will begin to expire in 2030, and the California NOLs will begin to expire in 2028.2030. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods during which the deferred tax assets are expected to be deductible, Managementmanagement believes it is more likely than not we will realize the benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been established as of December 31, 20172022 or 2016.2021.


The effective tax rate for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 differs from the current federal statutory income tax rate as follows:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:
California franchise tax, net of federal tax benefit8.3 %8.4 %8.1 %
Tax exempt interest on municipal securities and loans(1.9)%(2.5)%(2.4)%
Tax exempt earnings on bank owned life insurance(0.4)%(1.0)%(0.5)%
Non-deductible acquisition related expenses— %0.6 %— %
Non-deductible executive compensation— %0.4 %— %
Low income housing and qualified zone academy bond tax credits(0.2)%(0.4)%(0.5)%
Stock-based compensation and excess tax benefits— %(0.1)%(0.2)%
Other(0.2)%(0.4)%— %
Effective Tax Rate26.6 %26.0 %25.5 %
 2017
2016
2015
Federal statutory income tax rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:   
California franchise tax, net of federal tax benefit6.9 %6.8 %6.8 %
Write down of federal deferred tax assets, net 1
10.5 % % %
Tax exempt interest on municipal securities and loans(6.1)%(4.0)%(4.2)%
Tax exempt earnings on bank owned life insurance(1.0)%(0.8)%(1.0)%
Non-deductible acquisition related expenses0.8 % % %
Low income housing and qualified zone academy bond tax credits(0.4)%(0.3)%(0.2)%
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefit 2
(0.3)% % %
Other(0.8)%(0.1)%(0.1)%
Effective Tax Rate44.6 %36.6 %36.3 %

1 Due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, we wrote down net deferred tax assets as of December 22, 2017 by $3.0 million and has been recorded in income tax expense in 2017.

2 Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2017, all excess (or deficient) tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation awards are recognized as income tax benefit (expense).


Bancorp and the Bank have entered into a tax allocation agreement, which provides that income taxes shall be allocated between the parties on a separate entity basis. The intent of this agreement is that each member of the consolidated group will incur no greater tax liability than it would have incurred on a stand-alone basis.




We file a consolidated return in the U.S. Federalfederal tax jurisdiction and a combined return in the State of California tax jurisdiction. There were no ongoing federal or state income tax examinations at the issuance of this report. We are no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities for years before 20142019 for federal income tax and before 20132018 for California. At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, there were no unrecognized tax benefits, and neither the Bank nor Bancorp had accruals for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.


Note 12:  Commitments and Contingencies


Leases
We rent certainlease premises under long-term non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates throughwith remaining terms of approximately 2 months to 19 years, 4 months, most of which include escalation clauses and one or more options to extend the year 2032. Mostlease term, and some of the leaseswhich contain lease termination clauses. Lease terms may include certain renewal options that were considered reasonably certain to be exercised.

We lease certain equipment under finance leases with initial terms of 3 years to 5 years. The equipment finance leases do not contain renewal options, bargain purchase options or residual value guarantees.


93


The following table shows the balances of operating and escalation clauses. Atfinance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as of December 31, 2017,2022 and 2021.
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Operating leases:
Operating lease right-of-use assets$24,821 $23,604 
Operating lease liabilities26,639 25,429 
Finance leases:
Finance lease right-of-use assets616 499 
Accumulated amortization(187)(93)
Finance lease right-of-use assets, net1
$429 $406 
Finance lease liabilities2
$439 $419 
1 Included in premises and equipment in the consolidated statements of condition.
2 Included in borrowings and other obligations in the consolidated statements of condition.

The following table shows supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities for the approximate minimum future commitments payable under non-cancelable contractsyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
(in thousands)202220212020
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities$6,116 $2,376 $18,633 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for finance lease liabilities$151 $444 $18 

The following table shows components of operating and finance lease cost for leased premises are as follows:the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
(in thousands)202220212020
Operating lease cost1
$5,356 $4,823 $4,498 
Variable lease cost— — 
Total operating lease cost$5,356 $4,823 $4,503 
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets2
$127 $96 $169 
Interest on finance lease liabilities3
Total finance lease cost$130 $98 $172 
Total lease cost$5,486 $4,921 $4,675 
1 Included in occupancy and equipment expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
2 Included in depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
3 Included in interest on borrowings and other obligations in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.


94


(in thousands)2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Operating leases1
$4,444
$4,198
$3,758
$2,138
$1,330
$2,904
$18,772
1 Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $51 thousand due inThe following table shows the future minimum lease payments, weighted average remaining lease terms, and weighted average discount rates under non-cancelable subleases.operating and finance lease arrangements as of December 31, 2022. The discount rates used to calculate the present value of lease liabilities were based on the collateralized FHLB borrowing rates that were commensurate with lease terms and minimum payments on the lease commencement date.

(in thousands)December 31, 2022
YearOperating LeasesFinance Leases
2023$5,343 $154 
20244,585 153 
20253,875 106 
20263,129 36 
20272,845 
Thereafter9,693 — 
Total minimum lease payments29,470 454 
Amounts representing interest (present value discount)(2,831)(15)
Present value of net minimum lease payments (lease liability)$26,639 $439 
Weighted average remaining term (in years)7.73.1
Weighted average discount rate2.26 %1.86 %
Rent expense included in occupancy expense totaled $4.1 million in 2017 and $3.9 million in 2016 and $4.2 million 2015.


Litigation Matters


WeBancorp may be party to legal actions whichthat arise from time to time as part ofin the normal course of our business. We believe, after consultation withBancorp's management is not aware of any pending legal counsel,proceedings to which either it or the Bank may be a party or has recently been a party that we have meritorious defenses in these actions, and that litigation contingent liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on ourthe financial position,condition or results of operations of Bancorp or cash flows.the Bank.


We areThe Bank is responsible for oura proportionate share of certain litigation indemnifications provided to Visa U.S.A. ("Visa") by its member banks in connection with Visa's lawsuits related to anti-trust charges and interchange fees ("Covered Litigation"). Our proportionate share of the litigation indemnification liability does not change or transfer upon the sale of our Class B Visa shares to member banks. Visa established an escrow account to pay for settlements or judgments in the Covered Litigation. Under the terms of the U.S. retrospective responsibility plan, when Visa funds the litigation escrow account, it triggers a conversion rate reduction of the Class B common stock to shares of Class A common stock, effectively reducing the aggregate value of the Class B common stock held by Visa's member banks like us.

In 2012, Visa had reached a $4.0 billion interchange multidistrict litigation class settlement agreement for which it maintains an escrow account to be used for settlements or judgments inwith plaintiffs representing a class of U.S. retailers. For the Covered Litigation. Atfiscal year ended September 30, 2022 and fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017, according to Visa's Form 10-Q filed on February 1, 2018, the escrow account balance was $828 million. While the accrued liability related to the Covered Litigation could be higher or lower than2022, Visa deposited an additional $600 million and $350 million, respectively, into the litigation escrow account balance, Visa did not record an additional accrual for the Covered Litigation during 2017. In 2017, a numberto address claims of class plaintiffs filed amended complaints for damages or filed new class complaints against Visa for injunctive relief. In addition, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. entered into a new, unconditional settlement agreement with Visa in October 2017. As of the date of Visa's filing, it had reached settlement agreements with individual merchants representing 51% of the Visa-branded payment card sales volume ofcertain merchants who opted out of the 2012 settlement agreement. Litigation is ongoing and untilAmended Settlement Agreement for a balance of $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2022. Combined with funds previously deposited with the appeal process is complete, Visa is uncertain whether it will resolve the claims as contemplated bycourt, these funds are expected to cover the settlement agreement and additional lawsuits may arise. payment obligations.

The outcome of the Covered Litigation affects the conversion rate of Visa Class B common stock held by us to Visa Class A common stock, (asas discussed above and in Note 2, Investment Securities) may decrease if Visa makes more Covered LitigationSecurities. The final conversion rate is subject to change depending on the final settlement payments, in the future, and the full effect on member banks is still uncertain. Litigation is ongoing and until the court approval process is complete, there is no assurance that Visa will resolve the claims as contemplated by the amended class settlement agreement, and additional lawsuits may arise from individual merchants who opted out of the class settlement. However, we are not awareuntil the escrow account is fully depleted and the conversion rate of significantClass B to Class A common stock is reduced to zero, no future cash settlement payments are required by the member banks, such as us, on the Covered Litigation. Therefore, we are not required to record any contingent liabilities for the indemnification related to the Covered Litigation, as we consider the probability of losses to be remote. For further information, including a discussion of a reduction to our holdings of Class B Visa shares, refer to Note 2, Investment Securities.


95


Note 13: Concentrations of Credit Risk


Concentration of credit risk is the risk associated with a lack of diversification, such as having substantial investments in a few individual issuers, thereby potentially exposing us to greater risks resulting from adverse economic, political, regulatory, geographic, industrial or credit developments. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities and loans.
Our cash in correspondent bank accounts, at times, may exceed FDIC insured limits. We place cash and cash equivalents with the Federal Reserve Bank and other high credit quality financial institutions, periodically monitor their credit worthiness and limit the amount of credit exposure withto any one institution according to regulations.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to investment securities are limitedprimarily related to the U.S. Government, its agenciesgovernment and Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSEs") and was $358.4 million,GSEs, which accounted for $1.535 billion, or 74%87% of our total investment portfolio at December 31, 20172022 and $299.5 million,$1.277 billion, or 72%85% at December 31, 2016.2021. The increase is from the deployment of excess liquidity throughout 2022 into securities with purchases of $516.6 million of this security type. The largest security not issued by the U.S. Government or a GSE accounted for approximately 1% of our total investment portfolio at December 31, 2022, and 2% at December 31, 2021.


We also manage our credit exposure related to our loan portfolio to avoid the risk of undue concentration of credits in a particular industry by reducing significant exposure to highly leveraged transactions or to any individual customer or counterparty, and by obtaining collateral, as appropriate. No individualsingle borrower accountsrelationship accounted for more than 2%3% of loans held in the portfolio.outstanding loan balances at December 31, 2022 or 2021. The largest loan concentration group by industry of the borrowers is real estate, which accountsaccounted for 81%89% and 79%84% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The increase in the percentage in real estate from 2021 to 2022 was primarily due to a $107.7 million reduction in unsecured loans guaranteed by the SBA under the PPP, which are included in commercial and industrial loans.


Note 14: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities


We have entered into interest rate swap agreements, primarily as an asset/liability management strategy, in order to mitigate the changes in the fair value of specified long-term fixed-rate loans (or firm commitments to enter into long-term fixed-rate loans) caused by changes in interest rates. These hedges allow us to offer long-term fixed rate loans to customers without assuming the interest rate risk of a long-term asset. Converting our fixed-rate interest payments to floating-rate interest payments, generally benchmarked to the one-month U.S. dollar LIBOR index, protects us against changes in the fair value of our loans associated with fluctuating interest rates.


Our credit exposure, if any, on interest rate swap asset positions is limited to the fair value (net of any collateral pledged to us) and interest payments of all swaps by each counterparty. Conversely, when an interest rate swap is in a liability position exceeding a certain threshold, we may be required to post collateral to the counterparty in an amount determined by the agreements. Collateral levels are monitored and adjusted on a regular basis for changes in interest rate swap values.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, we had fivefour interest rate swap agreements, which are scheduled to mature inat various dates ranging from June 2031 October 2031, July 2032, August 2037 andto October 2037. All of our derivatives are accounted for as fair value hedges. The notional amounts of the interest rate contracts are equal to the notional amounts of the hedged loans. Our interest rate swap payments are settled monthly with counterparties. Accrued interest receivable on the swaps totaled $8$5 thousand and $13 thousand as ofat December 31, 20172022, and 2016, respectively.accrued interest payable on the swaps totaled $11 thousand at December 31, 2021. Information on our derivatives follows:
 Asset derivativesLiability derivatives
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Fair value hedges:  
Interest rate contracts notional amount$12,046 $— $— $13,037 
Interest rate contracts fair value 1
$602 $— $— $1,085 
 Asset derivativesLiability derivatives
(in thousands)December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Fair value hedges:    
Interest rate contracts notional amount$4,019
$4,217
$14,810
$15,495
Interest rate contracts fair value 1
$74
$55
$740
$933
 Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)2017
2016
2015
Increase in value of designated interest rate swaps due to LIBOR interest rate movements recognized in interest income$212
$778
$280
Payment on interest rate swaps recorded in interest income(333)(556)(918)
Decrease in value of hedged loans recognized in interest income(166)(571)(308)
Decrease in value of yield maintenance agreement recognized against interest income(15)(94)(52)
Net loss on derivatives recognized against interest income 2
$(302)$(443)$(998)

1 SeeRefer to Note 9, Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities, for valuation methodology.
2 Includes

96


The following table presents the carrying amount and associated cumulative basis adjustment related to the application of fair value hedge ineffectiveness gain of $31 thousand, gain of $113 thousandand loss of $80 thousand for the years December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Changes in value of swaps wereaccounting that is included in the assessmentcarrying amount of hedge effectiveness. Hedge ineffectiveness ishedged assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Carrying Amounts of Hedged AssetsCumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Loans
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Loans$11,319 $13,976 $(726)$939 

The following table presents the measurenet losses recognized in interest income on loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income related to our derivatives designated as fair value hedges:
 Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)202220212020
Interest and fees on loans 1
$93,868 $91,612 $84,674 
Increase (decrease) in value of designated interest rate swaps due to LIBOR interest rate movements$1,687 $827 $(734)
Payment on interest rate swaps(143)(369)(360)
(Decrease) increase in value of hedged loans(1,666)(814)809 
Decrease in value of yield maintenance agreement(10)(11)(12)
Net losses on fair value hedging derivatives recognized in interest income$(132)$(367)$(297)
1 Represents the extent toincome line item in the statements of comprehensive (loss) income in which the change in theeffects of fair value of the hedging instruments does not exactly offset the change in the fair value of the hedged items from period to period.
hedges are recorded.


Our derivative transactions with counterparties are under International Swaps and Derivative Association (“ISDA”) master agreements that include “right of set-off” provisions. “Right of set-off” provisions are legally enforceable rights to offset recognized amounts and there may be an intention to settle such amounts on a net basis. We do not offset such financial instruments for financial reporting purposes.




Information on financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated statements of condition follows:
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
Gross AmountsNet AmountsGross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Condition
Gross AmountsOffset in theof Assets Presented
of RecognizedStatements ofin the StatementsFinancialCash Collateral
(in thousands)AssetsConditionof ConditionInstrumentsReceivedNet Amount
December 31, 2022
   Counterparty$602 $— $602 $— $— $602 
December 31, 2021
   Counterparty$— $— $— $— $— $— 
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
    Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Condition 
  Gross AmountsNet Amounts   
 Gross AmountsOffset in theof Assets Presented   
 of RecognizedStatements ofin the StatementsFinancialCash Collateral 
(in thousands)
Assets1
Condition
of Condition1
InstrumentsReceivedNet Amount
December 31, 2017      
Derivatives by Counterparty:      
   Counterparty A$74

$74
$(74)
$
Total$74
$
$74
$(74)$
$
       
December 31, 2016      
Derivatives by Counterparty:      
   Counterparty A$55
$
$55
$(55)$
$
Total$55
$
$55
$(55)$
$
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities 1
Gross Amounts Offset in the Statements of Condition
Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statements of Condition 1
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Condition
Financial InstrumentsCash Collateral Pledged
(in thousands)Net Amount
December 31, 2022
   Counterparty$— $— $— $— — $— 
December 31, 2021
   Counterparty$1,085 $— $1,085 $— (1,085)$— 
1 Amounts exclude accrued interest totaling $0.3 thousand and $1 thousand at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.on swaps.

Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
    Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Condition 
  Gross AmountsNet Amounts of   
 Gross AmountsOffset in theLiabilities Presented   
 of RecognizedStatements ofin the Statements ofFinancialCash Collateral 
(in thousands)
Liabilities2
Condition
Condition2
InstrumentsPledgedNet Amount
December 31, 2017      
Derivatives by Counterparty:      
   Counterparty A$740

$740
$(74)(666)$
Total$740
$
$740
$(74)$(666)$
       
December 31, 2016      
Derivatives by Counterparty:      
   Counterparty A$933
$
$933
$(55)$(878)$
Total$933
$
$933
$(55)$(878)$

2 Amounts exclude accrued interest totaling $8 thousand and $12 thousand at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Note 15: Regulatory Matters


We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements as set forth in the following tables below can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our consolidated
97


financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and the Bank’s prompt corrective action classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings and other factors.

CapitalManagement reviews capital ratios are reviewed by Management on a regular basis and produces a five-year capital plan semi-annually to ensure that capital exceeds the prescribed regulatory minimums and is adequate to meet our anticipated future needs.  For all periods presented, the Bank’s ratios exceed the regulatory definition of “well capitalized”“well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action and Bancorp’s ratios exceed the required minimum ratios to be considered a well capitalizedwell-capitalized bank holding company. In addition, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action as of December 31, 2017.2022. There are no conditions or events since that notification that


Management management believes have changed the Bank’s categories and we expect the Bank to remain well capitalizedcapitalized for prompt corrective action purposes.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("Agencies") finalized regulatory capital rules known as “Basel III.” The rules became effective beginning January 2015, and will be fully phased-in by January 2019. The guidelines, among other things, changed the minimum capital requirements of banks and bank holding companies, by increasing the Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio to 6%, and introduced a new requirement to maintain a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%. By 2019, when fully phased in, the rules will require further increases to certain minimum capital requirements and a capital conservation buffer of an additional 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.

In August 2017, the Agencies published a final rule ("transitions NPR") halting the phase-in of certain Basel III capital rules for banks not using the Basel advanced approaches. The rule extends the regulatory capital treatment applicable during 2017 under the regulatory capital rules for certain items. These items include regulatory capital deductions, risk weights, and certain minority interest limitations. This effectively pauses the full transition to the Basel III treatment of mortgage servicing assets, certain deferred tax assets, investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions and minority interests while the Agencies pursue more extensive rulemaking to simplify the treatment of assets. The transitions NPR that was effective January 1, 2018 does not apply to Bank of Marin.

We have modeled our ratios under fully phased-in Basel III rules and, based on present facts, we do not expect that we will be required to raise additional capital as a result of the fully phased-in rules.


The Bancorp’s and Bank's capital adequacy ratios as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 are presented in the following tables. Bancorp's Tier 1 capital includes the subordinated debentures, which are not included at the Bank level. We continued to build capital in 2017 through stock issued in the Bank of Napa acquisition and the accumulation of net income.
Capital Ratios for Bancorp
(dollars in thousands)
Actual RatioAdequately Capitalized ThresholdRatio to be a Well Capitalized Bank Holding Company
December 31, 2022AmountRatioAmountRatioAmountRatio
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$431,667 15.90 %≥  $285,079 ≥ 10.50 %≥  $271,504 ≥ 10.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$407,912 15.02 %≥  $230,778 ≥ 8.50 %≥  $217,203 ≥ 8.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$407,912 9.60 %≥  $169,948 ≥ 4.00 %≥  $212,435 ≥ 5.00 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$407,912 15.02 %≥  $190,053 ≥ 7.00 %≥  $176,478 ≥ 6.50 %
December 31, 2021      
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$397,101 14.58 %≥  $286,035 ≥ 10.50 %≥  $272,414 ≥ 10.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$373,286 13.70 %≥  $231,552 ≥ 8.50 %≥  $217,931 ≥ 8.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$373,286 8.85 %≥  $168,750 ≥ 4.00 %≥  $210,937 ≥ 5.00 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$373,286 13.70 %≥  $190,690 ≥ 7.00 %≥  $177,069 ≥ 6.50 %
Capital Ratios for the Bank (dollars in thousands)
Actual RatioAdequately Capitalized ThresholdRatio to be Well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
December 31, 2022AmountRatioAmountRatioAmountRatio
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$427,108 15.73 %≥  $285,052 ≥ 10.50 %≥  $271,478 ≥ 10.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$403,352 14.86 %≥  $230,757 ≥ 8.50 %≥  $217,183 ≥ 8.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$403,352 9.49 %≥  $169,940 ≥ 4.00 %≥  $212,425 ≥ 5.00 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$403,352 14.86 %≥  $190,035 ≥ 7.00 %≥  $176,461 ≥ 6.50 %
December 31, 2021      
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$390,924 14.35 %≥  $286,009 ≥ 10.50 %≥  $272,390 ≥   10.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$367,109 13.48 %≥  $231,531 ≥ 8.50 %≥  $217,912 ≥   8.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$367,109 8.70 %≥  $168,724 ≥ 4.00 %≥  $210,905 ≥   5.00 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$367,109 13.48 %≥  $190,673 ≥ 7.00 %≥  $177,053 ≥   6.50 %

Capital Ratios for Bancorp
(dollars in thousands)
Actual Ratio 
Adequately Capitalized Threshold 1
 Ratio to be a Well Capitalized Bank Holding Company
December 31, 2017Amount
Ratio
 Amount
Ratio
 Amount
Ratio
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$287,435
14.91% ≥ $178,323
≥ 9.250% ≥ $192,782
≥ 10.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$270,710
14.04% ≥ $139,767
≥ 7.250% ≥ $154,225
≥ 8.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$270,710
12.13% ≥ $89,285
≥ 4.000% ≥ $111,607
≥ 5.000%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$265,119
13.75% ≥ $110,849
≥ 5.750% ≥ $125,308
≥ 6.500%
December 31, 2016 
 
  
 
  
 
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$247,453
14.32% ≥ $149,039
≥ 8.625% ≥ $172,799
≥ 10.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$231,111
13.37% ≥ $114,479
≥ 6.625% ≥ $138,239
≥ 8.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$231,111
11.39% ≥ $81,189
≥ 4.000% ≥ $101,486
≥ 5.000%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$225,925
13.07% ≥ $88,559
≥ 5.125% ≥ $112,319
≥ 6.500%
1 The 2017 and 2016 adequately capitalized thresholds include the capital conservation buffer that was effective January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017, respectively. These ratios are not reflected on a fully phased-in basis.


Capital Ratios for the Bank  (dollars in thousands)
Actual Ratio 
Adequately Capitalized Threshold 1
 Ratio to be Well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
December 31, 2017Amount
Ratio
 Amount
Ratio
 Amount
Ratio
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$283,885
14.73% ≥ $178,281
≥ 9.250% ≥ $192,737
≥ 10.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$267,160
13.86% ≥ $139,734
≥ 7.250% ≥ $154,189
≥ 8.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$267,160
11.97% ≥ $89,275
≥ 4.000% ≥ $111,593
≥ 5.000%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$267,160
13.86% ≥ $110,824
≥ 5.750% ≥ $125,279
≥ 6.500%
December 31, 2016 
 
  
 
  
 
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$243,468
14.09% ≥ $149,016
≥ 8.625% ≥ $172,772
≥ 10.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)$222,127
13.15% ≥ $114,462
≥ 6.625% ≥ $138,218
≥ 8.000%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)$222,127
11.19% ≥ $81,176
≥ 4.000% ≥ $101,469
≥ 5.000%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)$222,127
13.15% ≥ $88,546
≥ 5.125% ≥ $112,302
≥ 6.500%
1 The 2017 and 2016 adequately capitalized thresholds include the capital conservation buffer that was effective January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017, respectively. These ratios are not reflected on a fully phased-in basis.

Note 16:  Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
 
We make commitments to extend credit in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of loans or through standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because various commitments will expire without being fully drawn, upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
 
We are exposed toOur credit loss exposure is equal to the contractual amount of the commitment in the event of nonperformance by the borrower. We use the same credit underwriting criteria for all credit exposure. The amount of collateral
98


obtained, if deemed necessary by us, is based on Management'smanagement's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral types pledged may include accounts receivable, inventory, other personal property and real property.


The contractual amount of undrawnunfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit not reflected onin the consolidated statements of condition are as follows:
(in thousands)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Commercial lines of credit$292,204 $330,234 
Revolving home equity lines218,907 210,938 
Undisbursed construction loans43,179 78,381 
Personal and other lines of credit10,842 11,001 
Standby letters of credit1,738 3,657 
   Total unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit$566,870 $634,211 
(in thousands)December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Commercial lines of credit$224,370
$216,774
Revolving home equity lines177,678
148,143
Undisbursed construction loans35,322
44,798
Personal and other lines of credit11,758
10,635
Standby letters of credit4,074
1,939
   Total commitments and standby letters of credit$453,202
$422,289


As of December 31, 2022, approximately 42% of the commitments expire in 2023, 42% expire between 2024 and 2030 and 16% expire thereafter.

We record an allowance for credit losses on these off-balanceunfunded loan commitments at the balance sheet commitmentsdate based on an estimateestimates of probabilities ofthe probability that these commitments beingwill be drawn upon according to the historical utilization experience onof the different types of commitments and expected loss. We set aside anloss rates determined for pooled funded loans. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheetunfunded commitments in the amount of $958 thousandtotaled $1.5 million and $899 thousand$1.8 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,December 31, 2021, respectively, which is recordedincluded in interest payable and other liabilities onin the consolidated statements of condition. Approximately 44%

The $318 thousand decrease in the allowance for unfunded commitments in 2022 was largely due to the decrease in the balance of unfunded commitments.

The $993 thousand decrease in the allowance for unfunded commitments in 2021 was largely due to ongoing improvements in the underlying economic forecasts under the CECL accounting method at the time.

We adopted the CECL accounting standard on December 31, 2020, (refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses for additional information). During the first nine months of 2020, we increased the allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments under the incurred loss method ("previous GAAP") by $610 thousand. Upon adoption of the CECL standard, we increased it by $1.1 million, which included approximately $550 thousand related to a $36.9 million increase in available commitments expireduring the fourth quarter of 2020. The remaining increase was due to changes in 2018, approximately 41% expirecredit loss assumptions between 2019the CECL and 2025 and approximately 15% expire thereafter.

incurred loss methods at the time.




















99





Note 17:  Condensed Bank of Marin Bancorp Parent Only Financial Statements


Presented below is financial information for Bank of Marin Bancorp, parent holding company only.
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, 2022 and 2021
(in thousands)20222021
Assets
   Cash and due from Bank of Marin$4,493 $6,624 
   Investment in bank subsidiary407,532 444,191 
   Other assets255 243 
     Total assets$412,280 $451,058 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
   Accrued expenses payable$188 $318 
   Other liabilities— 372 
     Total liabilities188 690 
   Stockholders' equity412,092 450,368 
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$412,280 $451,058 

CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(in thousands)202220212020
Income
   Dividends from bank subsidiary$16,200 $64,000 $16,200 
   Miscellaneous income— — 
     Total income16,200 64,000 16,203 
Expense
   Interest expense— 1,361 158 
   Non-interest expense1,793 4,025 1,325 
     Total expense1,793 5,386 1,483 
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary14,407 58,614 14,720 
   Income tax benefit530 1,235 437 
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary14,937 59,849 15,157 
Earnings of bank subsidiary greater (less) than dividends received from bank subsidiary31,649 (26,621)15,085 
     Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 

100


CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, 2017 and 2016
   
(in thousands)20172016
Assets  
   Cash and due from Bank of Marin$3,246
$3,568
   Investment in bank subsidiary299,486
232,431
   Other assets586
670
     Total assets$303,318
$236,669
   
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity  
   Subordinated debentures$5,739
$5,586
   Accrued expenses payable146
96
   Other liabilities408
424
     Total liabilities6,293
6,106
   Stockholders' equity297,025
230,563
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$303,318
$236,669
CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(in thousands)202220212020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income$46,586 $33,228 $30,242 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Earnings of bank subsidiary (greater) less than dividends received from bank subsidiary(31,649)26,621 (15,085)
Accretion of discount on subordinated debenture— 1,347 69 
Noncash director compensation expense36 35 31 
Net changes in:
Other assets(12)(1,655)(4)
Other liabilities(129)(88)59 
Net cash provided by operating activities14,832 59,488 15,312 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital contribution to bank subsidiary(899)(619)(1,464)
Net cash used in investing activities(899)(619)(1,464)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from stock options exercised and stock issued under employee and director stock purchase plans899 587 1,419 
Repayment of subordinated debenture including execution costs— (4,126)— 
Restricted stock surrendered for tax withholdings upon vesting(40)(166)(73)
Cash dividends paid on common stock(15,673)(13,107)(12,506)
Stock repurchased, including commissions(1,250)(40,762)(6,898)
Net cash used in financing activities(16,064)(57,574)(18,058)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(2,131)1,295 (4,210)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year6,624 5,329 9,539 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$4,493 $6,624 $5,329 
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Stock issued in payment of director fees$355 $217 $217 
Repurchase of stock not yet settled$— $373 $413 
Stock issued to ESOP$1,233 $1,330 $1,289 


CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
    
(in thousands)201720162015
Income   
   Dividends from bank subsidiary$8,000
$6,400
$6,500
   Miscellaneous Income8
7
6
     Total income8,008
6,407
6,506
Expense   
   Interest expense439
435
420
   Non-interest expense2,087
984
973
     Total expense2,526
1,419
1,393
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary5,482
4,988
5,113
   Income tax benefit876
594
583
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary6,358
5,582
5,696
Earnings of bank subsidiary greater (less) than dividends received from bank subsidiary9,618
17,552
12,745
     Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441



CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
    
(in thousands)201720162015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net income$15,976
$23,134
$18,441
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Earnings of bank subsidiary greater than dividends received from bank subsidiary(9,618)(17,552)(12,745)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:   
       Accretion of discount on subordinated debentures153
191
210
Other assets92
353
(298)
Intercompany receivable(40)171
(18)
Other liabilities51
(302)368
Noncash director compensation expense - common stock20


Net cash provided by operating activities6,634
5,995
5,958
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:   
Capital contribution to subsidiary(853)(1,285)(1,156)
Net cash used in investing activities(853)(1,285)(1,156)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from stock options exercised and stock issued under employee and director stock purchase plans and ESOP853
1,285
1,156
Payment of tax withholdings for stock options exercised(60)

Dividends paid on common stock(6,896)(6,223)(5,390)
Net cash used by financing activities(6,103)(4,938)(4,234)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(322)(228)568
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period3,568
3,796
3,228
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$3,246
$3,568
$3,796
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:   
Stock issued in payment of director fees$188
$234
$275





Note 18: AcquisitionMerger


On November 21, 2017, weBancorp completed theits merger and acquired all assets and assumed all liabilities ofAMRB on August 6, 2021. The Merger expanded Bank of Napa, N.A. (OTCQB: BNNP), to enhance our marketMarin's presence in Napa, California. Bank of Napa was a national bank with two branch offices serving Napa. The acquisitionthroughout the Greater Sacramento, Amador and Sonoma County Regions where AMRB had ten branches. The Merger added $134.7$898.4 million in loans, $249.9 million in deposits and $75.5total assets, including $297.8 million in investment securities and $419.4 million in loans, and $816.6 million in total liabilities, including $790.0 million in deposits, to Bank of Marin as of the acquisitionmerger date. Bank of Napa shareholders received 0.307 shares of Bancorp common stockaccounted for each share of Bank of Napa common stock outstanding. The acquisition of Bank of Napa constitutedthe Merger as a business combination and has been accounted for usingunder the acquisition method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their fair values as of the acquisitionmerger date in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The acquisition was treated as a "reorganization" within the definition

AMRB's shareholders received 0.575 shares of section 368(a)Bancorp's common for each share of the Internal Revenue Code and is generally considered tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The following table reflects the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed relatedAMRB common stock outstanding immediately prior to the acquisition:Merger resulting in the issuance of 3,441,235 shares of Bancorp common stock. In addition, merger consideration included cash paid for outstanding stock options and cash paid in lieu of fractional shares, as summarized in the following table.
(in thousands)Merger Consideration
Value of common stock consideration paid to shareholders (0.575 fixed exchange ratio, stock price $36.15)$124,401 
Cash consideration for stock options63
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares13
Total merger consideration$124,477 

101


(dollars in thousands)Acquisition Date November 21, 2017
Assets: 
  Cash and cash equivalents$59,779
  Investment securities75,469
  Loans134,720
  Core deposit intangible4,441
  Goodwill23,705
  Bank premises and equipment599
  Other assets6,408
     Total assets acquired$305,121
Liabilities: 
  Deposits: 
     Non-interest bearing$77,266
     Interest bearing 
        Transaction accounts50,080
        Savings accounts12,157
        Money market accounts85,045
        Other time accounts25,338
      Total deposits249,886
  Other liabilities2,050
     Total liabilities assumed$251,936
Merger consideration of $53,185 (735,264 common shares and 70,145 shares of replacement stock options issued by Bank of Marin Bancorp).$53,185

The following table presents the net assets acquired from Bank of Napa, consideration paid and the estimated fair value adjustments:
(dollars in thousands)Acquisition Date November 21, 2017
Book value of net assets acquired from Bank of Napa$26,152
Fair value adjustments: 
  Loans1,301
  Core deposit intangible asset4,441
     Total purchase accounting adjustments5,742
  Deferred tax liabilities (tax effect of purchase accounting adjustments at 42.05%)(2,414)
  Fair value of net assets acquired from Bank of Napa$29,480
Merger consideration$53,185
Less: fair value of net assets acquired(29,480)
Goodwill$23,705





Goodwill

As a result of the Bank of Napa acquisition, weWe recorded $23.7$42.6 million in goodwill, which representsrepresented the excess of the total purchase pricemerger consideration paid of $124.5 million over the fair value of the net assets acquired net of the fair values of liabilities assumed.$81.9 million. Goodwill mainly reflects expected value created through the combined operations of Bank of NapaAMRB and Bank of Marin. ItBancorp and is evaluated for impairment annually. We determined that the fair value of our traditional community banking activities (provided through our branch network) exceeded the carrying amount of the bank-level reporting unit. Therefore, no impairment on goodwill was recorded in 2017. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.


The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant assetsMerger-related and liabilities whose fair values are different from their carrying amounts on Bank of Napa's books at acquisition date presented above.

Loans

The fair values for acquired loans were developed based upon the present values of the expected cash flows utilizing market-derived discount rates. Expected cash flows for each acquired loan were projected based on contractual cash flows adjusted for expected prepayment, expected default (i.e. probability of default and loss severity), and principal recovery.

Prepayment rates were applied to the principal outstanding based on the type of loan, where appropriate. Prepayments were based on a constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) applied across the life of a loan. For performing loans, we used annual CPRs between 5 percent and 27 percent, depending on the characteristics of the loan pool (e.g. construction, commercial real estate, etc.). For classified loans, no prepayment was assumed and applied.

Non-PCI loans were valued on a loan-by-loan basis when applying the discount rate on the expected cash flows. The discount rates used were based on current market rates for new originations of comparable loans, where available, and include adjustments for credit and illiquidity premium. To the extent comparable market rates are not readily available, a discount rate was derived based on the assumptions of a market participant's cost of funds, capital charge, servicingconversion costs and return requirements for comparable risk assets. PCI loans were also valued on an individual basis.

The following table presents the fair value of loans acquired from Bank of Napa for PCI loans as of the acquisition date (November 21, 2017):
(in thousands)PCI loans
Contractually required payments including interest$1,769
Less: contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)805
Cash flows expected to be collected (undiscounted)964
Less: interest component of cash flows expected to be collected (accretable yield)109
Fair value of PCI loans$855

The following table presents the fair value of loans acquired from Bank of Napa for non-PCI loans as of the acquisition date (November 21, 2017):
(in thousands)Non-PCI loans
Contractually required payments including interest$183,833
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected$14,227
Fair value of non-PCI loans$133,865

The following table reflects the outstanding balance and related fair value of PCI loans as of the acquisition date:
PCI Loans (in thousands)
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value
Commercial$417
$70
Commercial real estate1,070
785
Total purchased credit-impaired loans$1,487
$855



Core Deposit Intangible

The core deposit intangible represents the estimated future benefits of acquired deposits and is booked separately from the related deposits. The value of the core deposit intangible asset was determined using a discounted cash flow approach to arrive at the cost differential between the core deposits (non-maturity deposits such as transaction, savings and money market accounts) and alternative funding sources. It was calculated as the present value of the difference  in  cash flows between maintaining the core deposits (interest and net maintenance costs) and the cost of an equal amount of  funds with a similar term from an alternative source. The core deposit intangible is amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated ten-year life, and is evaluated periodically for impairment. No impairment loss was recognized in 2017.

We recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $4.4 million at acquisition, of which $56 thousand was amortized in 2017. At December 31, 2017, the future estimated amortization expense on the CDI from the Bank of Napa acquisition is as follows:
(in thousands)2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Core deposit intangible amortization$508
$499
$488
$475
$460
$1,955
$4,385

Pro Forma Results of Operations

The first column of the following table presents the former Bank of Napa's operations and its actual contribution to our net interest income and net income included in our consolidated statement of comprehensive income from the acquisition date (November 21, 2017) through December 31, 2017. The table also presents pro forma information of the combined entity as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2016. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it indicative of the results of operations in future periods. Furthermore, cost savings and other business synergies related to the acquisition are not reflected in the pro forma amounts.
Pro Forma Revenue and Earnings    
(in thousands)Actual from acquisition date through December 31, 2017
 2017
 2016
 
Net interest income$913
 $82,802
 $80,898
 
Net (loss) Income$(576)
1 
$18,898
2 
$21,559
2 
1 Bank of Napa's net loss from November 21, 2017 through December 31, 2017 includes acquisition-related costs, accretion of the discount on acquired loans and core deposit intangible amortization.
2 2017 pro forma combined net income was adjusted to exclude acquisition related costs of $2.2 million incurred by Bank of Marin Bancorp and $2.5 million incurred by Bank of Napa. 2016 pro forma combined earnings were adjusted to include these acquisition related costs as if the merger occurred on January 1, 2016.

Acquisition-related expenses are recognized as incurred and continue until all systems have been converted and operational functions becomeare fully integrated. Bank of Marin Bancorp incurred acquisition-related expensesBancorp's pretax merger-related costs reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income are summarized in 2017 for the Bank of Napa acquisition as follows:following table.
Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)202220212020
Personnel and severance$393 $3,005 $— 
Professional services67 1,976 — 
Data processing77 1,127 — 
Other expense321 350 — 
Total merger-related and conversion costs$858 $6,458 $— 
(in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2017
Data processing1
$1,108
Professional services952
Personnel severance35
Other114
   Total$2,209
1 Primarily relates to Bank of Napa's core processing system contract termination and deconversion fees.



End of 20172022 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

102


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


ITEM 9.  �� CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.


ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


(A)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Bank of Marin Bancorp and its subsidiary (the "Company") conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Management,management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information we are required to be disclosed by usdisclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a etseq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission'sSEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to be disclosed by usdisclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our Management,management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.


(B)Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) promulgated under the 1934 Act). The internal control process has been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, Managementmanagement has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2022.


There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting. These limitations include the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of the system and reasonable resource constraints. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Management's report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth in ITEM 8 and is incorporated herein by reference.


(C)Audit Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams, LLP, has audited the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172022 as stated in their audit report, which is included in ITEM 8 and incorporated herein by reference.


(D)Changes in Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting


As a result of the acquisition of Bank of Napa in November 2017, we continue to integrate and incorporate their business processes and systems into our overall internal control over financial reporting. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, other than the interim effect of the acquisition noted above,2022, there were no


significant changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation mentioned in (B) above. The term internal control over financial reporting, as defined by Rule

103


15d-15(f) of the Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the issuer's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION


None.

ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

PART III     


ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Bancorp and the Bank have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all staff including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. A copy of the Code of Ethical Conduct, which is also included on our website, will be provided to any person, without charge, upon written request to Corporate Secretary, Bank of Marin Bancorp, 504 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 100, Novato, CA 94947. During 20172022 there were no changes in the procedures for the election or nomination of directors.


ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
ITEM 12.         SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from ITEM 5 above, Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements and our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is Moss Adams LLP, Issuing Office: Portland, OR, PCAOB ID: 659.

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.




104


PART IV


ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesEXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(A)     Documents Filed as Part of this Report:


1.     Financial Statements


The financial statements and supplementary data listed below are filed as part of this report under ITEM 8, captioned Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Data.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015    2020
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting     
Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021    
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020    
Consolidated StatementStatements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020    
Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    


2.     Financial Statement Schedules


All financial statement schedules have been omitted, as they are inapplicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.


(B)    Exhibits Filed:


The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by references to filings previously made with the SEC.


105


  Incorporated by Reference 
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling DateHerewith
2.018-K001-335722.1August 2, 2017 
3.0110-Q001-335723.01November 7, 2007 
3.0210-Q001-335723.02May 9, 2011 
3.02a8-K001-335723.03July 6, 2015 
4.018-A12B001-335724.1July 7, 2017 
10.01S-8333-2182744.1May 26, 2017 
10.02S-8333-2212194.1October 30, 2017 
10.03S-8333-2190674.1June 30, 2017 
10.04S-8333-1676394.1June 21, 2010 
10.0510-Q001-3357210.06November 7, 2007 
10.068-K001-3357210.1January 26, 2009 
10.078-K001-3357299.1October 21, 2010 
10.088-K001-3357210.1January 6, 2011 
10.098-K001-3357210.4January 6, 2011 
10.108-K001-3357210.2
November 4, 2014 
10.118-K001-3357210.3November 4, 2014 
10.128-K001-3357210.4June 2, 2015 
10.138-K001-3357210.1October 31, 2007 
10.148-K001-3357210,100July 17, 2012 
11.01    Filed
14.0210-K001-3357214.02March 14, 2017 
23.01    Filed
31.01    Filed
31.02    Filed
32.01    Filed
101.01*XBRL Interactive Data File    Furnished
 Incorporated by Reference 
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling DateHerewith
2.018-K001-335722.1April 19, 2021
3.01S-4333-2570253.01June 11, 2021 
3.02S-4333-2570253.02June 11, 2021
4.01Filed
10.01S-8333-2182744.1May 26, 2017 
10.02S-8333-2212194.1October 30, 2017
10.03S-8333-2278404.1October 15, 2018
10.04S-8333-2395554.1June 30, 2020 
10.0510-Q001-3357210.06November 7, 2007 
10.0610-K001-3357210.07March 15, 2021
10.078-K001-3357210.2
November 4, 2014
10.088-K001-3357210.1October 31, 2007 
10.0910-K001-3357210.13March 15, 2021
10.108-K001-3357210.1September 24, 2021
10.118-K001-3357210.1December 21, 2022
10.128-K001-3357210.2December 21, 2022
10.138-K001-3357210.3December 21, 2022
10.148-K001-3357210.4December 21, 2022
14.0110-K001-3357214.01March 15, 2022
23.01Filed
31.01    Filed
31.02    Filed
32.01    Filed
101.INSInline XBRL Instance DocumentFiled
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentFiled
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentFiled
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document    Filed
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentFiled
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentFiled
*    As providedCopies of any exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K listed in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information isthe index above will be furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12
to shareholders as of the Securities Actrecord date without charge upon written request by such shareholder addressed as follows: Corporate Secretary, Bank of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Marin Bancorp, 504 Redwood Boulevard, Suite 100, Novato, CA  94947.


ITEM 16.     Form 10-K Summary


None.

106





SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Bank of Marin Bancorp (registrant)
March 14, 201815, 2023/s/ Russell A. Colombo
DateRussell A. Colombo
President &
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 14, 2018 /s/ Tani Girton
DateTani Girton
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 14, 2018/s/ Cecilia Situ
DateCecilia Situ
First Vice President &
Manager of Finance & Treasury
(Principal Accounting Officer)



107



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Timothy D. Myers
Dated:March 14, 2018 /s/ Tani GirtonTimothy D. Myers
Tani Girton
Executive Vice President & Chief FinancialExecutive Officer, Director
(Principal FinancialExecutive Officer)
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Cecilia Situ
Cecilia Situ
First Vice President & Manager of Finance & Treasury
(Principal Accounting Officer)


Dated:March 15, 2023 /s/ Tani Girton
Tani Girton
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ David A. Merck
David A. Merck
First Vice President & Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Members of Bank of Marin Bancorp's Board of Directors
Dated:March 14, 201815, 2023/s/ Brian M. Sobel
Brian M. Sobel
Chairman of the Board
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Russell A. Colombo
Russell A. Colombo
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Steven I. Barlow
Steven I. Barlow
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ James C. Hale
James C. Hale
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Robert Heller
Robert Heller
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Norma J. Howard
Norma J. Howard
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Kevin R. Kennedy
Kevin R. Kennedy
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ William H. McDevitt, Jr.
William H. McDevitt, Jr.
Chairman of the Board
Dated:March 14, 2018/s/ Leslie E. Murphy
Dated:March 15, 2023Leslie E. Murphy/s/ Nicolas C. Anderson
Nicolas C. Anderson
Dated:
Dated:March 14, 201815, 2023/s/ Steven I. Barlow
Steven I. Barlow
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Russell A. Colombo
Russell A. Colombo
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Charles D. Fite
Charles D. Fite
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ James C. Hale
James C. Hale
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Robert Heller
Robert Heller
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Kevin R. Kennedy
Kevin R. Kennedy
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Sanjiv S. Sanghvi
Sanjiv S. Sanghvi
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Joel Sklar
Joel Sklar, M.D.
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Brian M. Sobel
Brian M. Sobel
Dated:March 15, 2023/s/ Secil Tabli Watson
Secil Tabli Watson

Page-103108