~~-8-~~

Secure Credential

Our secure credential products consist of the following:

IWS Card Management. The IWS Card Management System (CMS) is a comprehensive solution to support and manage the issuance of smart cards complete with the following capabilities:

●·

Biometric enrollment and identity proofing with Smart Card encoding of biometrics;

●·

Flexible models of central or distributed issuance of credentials;

●·

Customizable card life-cycle workflow managed by the CMS; and

●·

Integration of the CMS data with other enterprise solutions, such as physical access control and logical access control (i.e. Single-Sign-On – SSO).

IWS EPI Suite. This is an ID software solution for producing, issuing, and managing secure credentials and personal identification cards. Users can efficiently manage large amounts of data, images and card designs, as well as track and issue multiple cards per person, automatically populate multiple cards and eliminate redundant data entry. IWS EPI Suite was designed to integrate with our customers’ existing security and computing infrastructure. We believe that this compatibility may be an appealing feature to corporations, government agencies, transportation departments, school boards, and other public institutions.

IWS EPI Builder. This is a software developer’s kit (SDK) and a leading secure credential component of identity management and security solutions, providing all aspects of ID functionality from image and biometric capture to the enrollment, issuance and management of secure documents. It contains components which developers or systems integrators can use to support and produce secure credentials including national IDs, passports, International Civil Aviation Office (ICAO)-compliant travel documents, smart cards and driver licenses. IWS EPI Builder enables organizations to develop custom identification solutions or incorporate sophisticated identification capabilities into existing applications including the ability to capture images, biometric and demographic data; enable biometric identification and verification (1:1 and 1:X) as well as support numerous biometric hardware and software vendors. It also enables users to add electronic identification functionality for other applications, including access control, tracking of time and attendance, point of sale transactions, human resource systems, school photography systems, asset management, inventory control, warehouse management, facilities management and card production systems.

IWS EPI PrintFarm. While it is the last stage of PIV Card Issuance, the PIV smart card printing process is by no means the least important stage. Production printing of tens of thousands of PIV cards requires a significant investment and a well-engineered system. The IWS EPI PrintFarm software offers a cost-effective yet high-performance method for high-volume card printing.

IWS PIV Encoder. PIV smart cards must be programmed with specific mandatory data, digital signatures and programs in order to maintain the interoperability as well as the security features specified for the cards. The IWS PIV Encoder could be considered to be a complex device driver that properly programs the PIV smart cards. The Encoder interacts with the Card Management System for data payload elements. It interacts with the Certificate Authority to encrypt or sign the PIV smart card data with trusted certificates. Finally, it acts as the application-level device driver to make the specific PIV smart card encoding system properly program the smart card, regardless if the system is a standalone encoding system or one integrated into a card printer.

~~-9-~~-6-

Table of Contents

Law Enforcement and Public Safety

We believe our integrated suite of software products significantly reduces the inefficiencies and expands the capabilities of traditional booking and mug shot systems. Using our products, an agency can create a digital database of thousands of criminal history records, each including one or more full-color facial images, finger and palm prints, biographic text information and images of other distinctive physical features such as scars, marks and tattoos (SMT’s). This database can be quickly searched using text queries, or biometric technology that can compare biometric characteristics of an unknown suspect with those in the database.

Our investigative software products can be used to create, edit and distribute both mug photo and SMT photo lineups of any size. In addition, electronic mug books display hundreds of images for a witness to review and from which electronic selections are made. The Witness View software component records the viewing of a lineup (mug photo or SMT) detailing the images provided for viewing along with the image or images selected. In addition to a printed report, the Witness View module provides a non-editable executable file (.exe) that may be played on any computer for court exhibit viewing purposes.

Our IWS Law Enforcement solution consists of software modules, which may also be purchased individually. The IWS Law Enforcement Capture and Investigative module make up our booking system and database. Our add-on modules include LiveScan, Facial Recognition, Law Enforcement Web and Witness View as well as the IWS Biometric Engine.

IWS Law Enforcement. IWS Law Enforcement is a digital booking, identification and investigative solution that enables users to digitally capture, store, search and retrieve images and demographic data including mug shots, fingerprints and scars, marks and tattoos (SMTs). Law enforcement may choose between submitting fingerprint data directly to the State AFIS, FBI criminal repository, or other agencies as required. Additional features and functionality include real-time access to images and data, creating of photo lineups and electronic mug books, and production of identification cards and credentials. IWS Law Enforcement also uses off-the-shelf hardware and is designed to comply with open industry standards so that it can operate on an array of systems ranging from a stand-alone personal computer to a wide area network. To avoid duplication of entries, the system can be integrated easily with several other information storage and retrieval systems, such as a records/jail management system (RMS/JMS) or an automated fingerprint identification system.

Capture. This software module allows users to capture and store a variety of images (facial, SMT and others such as evidence photos) as well as biographical text information. Each record includes images and text information in an easy-to-view format made up of fields designed and defined by the individual agency. Current customers of this module range from agencies that capture a few thousand mug shots per year to those that capture hundreds of thousands of mug shots each year.

LiveScan. This software module is FBI certified which complies with the FBI Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) Image Quality Specifications (IQS) while utilizing FBI certified LiveScan devices from most major vendors. LiveScan allows users to capture single to ten prints and palm data, providing an integrated biometric management solution for both civil and law enforcement use. By adding LiveScan capabilities, law enforcement organizations further enhance the investigative process by providing additional identifiers to identify suspects involved in a crime. In addition, officers no longer need to travel to multiple booking stations to capture fingerprints and mug shots. All booking information including images may be located at a central designation and from there routed to the State AFIS or FBI criminal history record repository.

Investigative. This software module allows users to search the database created with IWS Law Enforcement. Officers can conduct text searches in many fields, including file number, name, alias, distinctive features, and other information such as gang membership and criminal history. The Investigative module creates a catalogue of possible matches, allowing officers or witnesses to save time by looking only at mug shots that closely resemble the description of the suspect. This module can also be used to create a line-up of similar facial images from which a witness may identify the suspect.

~~-10-~~-7-

Table of Contents

Facial Recognition. This software module uses biometric facial recognition and retrieval technology to help authorities identify possible suspects. Images taken from surveillance videos or photographs can be searched against a digital database of facial images to retrieve any desired number of faces with similar characteristics. This module can also be used at the time of booking to identify persons using multiple aliases. Using biometrics-based technology, the application can search through thousands of facial images in a matter of seconds, reducing the time it would otherwise take a witness to flip through a paper book of facial images that may or may not be similar to the description of the suspect. The Facial Recognition module then creates a selection of possible matches ranked in order of similarity to the suspect, and a percentage confidence level is attributed to each possible match. The application incorporates search engine technology, which we license from various facial recognition algorithm providers.

LE Web. This software module enables authorized personnel to access and search agency booking records stored in IWS Law Enforcement through a standard Web browser from within the agency’s intranet. This module allows remote access to the IWS Law Enforcement database without requiring the user to be physically connected to the customer’s network. This application requires only that the user have access to the Internet and authorization to access the law enforcement agency’s intranet.

EPI Designer for Law Enforcement. The EPI Designer for LE software is a design solution created for the IWS Law Enforcement databases based on the IWS EPI Suite program. This program is integrated with the various IWS databases an agency is utilizing and allows for unique booking/inmate reports, wristbands, photo ID cards, Wanted or BOLO fliers, etc. to be created from the fields of information stored in booking records. Designs can be created in minutes and quickly added to the IWS Law Enforcement system allowing all users with appropriate permissions immediate access to the newly added form.

Maintenance and Customer Support

We offer software and hardware support to our customers. Customers can contract with us for technical support that enables them to use a toll-free number to speak with our technical support center for software support and general assistance 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As many of our government customers operate around the clock and perceive our systems as critical to their day-to-day operations, a very high percentage contract for technical support. Customer support services typically provide us with annual revenue of ~~12% to 18%~~approximately 15% of the initial sales price of the hardware and software purchased by our customers. For the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, maintenance revenues accounted for approximately ~~45%~~53% and ~~43%~~45% of our total revenues, respectively.

Software Customization and Fulfillment

We directly employ computer programmers and also retain independent programmers to develop our software and perform quality control. We provide customers with software that we specifically customize to operate on their existing computer system. We work directly with purchasers of our system to ensure that the system they purchase will meet their unique needs. We configure and test the system either at our facilities or on-site and conduct any customized programming necessary to connect the system with any legacy systems already in place. We can also provide customers with a complete computer hardware system with our software already installed and configured. In either case, the customer is provided with a complete turnkey solution, which can be used immediately. When we provide our customers with a complete solution including hardware, we use off-the-shelf computers, cameras and other components purchased from other companies such as Dell or Hewlett Packard. Systems are assembled and configured either at our facilities or at the customer’s location.

~~OUR STRATEGY~~Customers

We have a wide variety of domestic and international customers. Most of our IWS Law Enforcement customers are government agencies at the federal, state and local levels in the United States. Our secure credential products are also being used in Australia, Canada, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines. For the year ended December 31, 2011 one customer accounted for approximately 34% or $1,836,000 of total revenues and had $0 receivables as of the end of the year. For the year ended December 31, 2010 two customers accounted for approximately 31% or $1,803,000 of total revenues and had trade receivables of approximately $15,000 as of the end of the year.

-8-

Table of Contents

Our Strategy

Our strategy is to provide patented open-architected identity management solutions including multi-biometric, secure credential and law enforcement technologies that are stand alone, integrated and/or bundled with key partners including channel relationships and large systems integrators such as, United Technology Security, SAIC, GCR, Unisys, HP, IBM and Safran, among others. Key elements of our strategy for growth include the following:

~~-11-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Fully Exploit the Biometrics, Access Control and Identification Markets

The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security coupled with the movement by governments around the world to authenticate the identity of their citizens, employees and contractors has accelerated the adoption of biometric identification systems that can provide secure credentials and instant access to centrally maintained records for real-time verification of identity and access (physical and logical) privileges. Using our products, an organization can create secure credentials that correspond to records including images and biographic data in a digital database. A border guard or customs agent can stop an individual to quickly and accurately verify his identity against a database of authorized persons, and either allow or deny access as required. Our technology is also standards based and applied to facilitate activities such as federal identification mandates while complying with personal identification verification standards (HSPD-12), International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) driver licenses, voter registration, immigration control and welfare fraud identification. We believe that these or very similar standards are applicable in markets throughout the world.

With the identity management market growing at a rapid pace, biometric identifiers are becoming recognized and accepted as integral components to the identification process in the public and private sectors. As biometric technologies (facial recognition, fingerprint, iris, etc.) are adopted, identification systems must be updated to enable their use in the field. We have built our solutions to enable the incorporation of one or multiple biometrics, which can be associated with a record and stored both in a database and on a card for later retrieval and verification without regard to the specific hardware employed. We believe the increasing demand for biometric technology will drive demand for our solutions. Our identity management products are built to accommodate the use of biometrics and meet the demanding requirements across the entire identity life cycle.

Expand Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets

We intend to use our successful installations with customers such as the Arizona Department of Public Safety, New South Wales Police, and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department as reference accounts and to market IWS Law Enforcement as a superior technological solution. Our recent addition of the LiveScan module and support for local AFIS to our IWS Law Enforcement will enhance its functionality and value to the law enforcement customer as well as increase the potential revenue the Company can generate from a system sale. We primarily sell directly to the law enforcement community. Our sales strategy is to increase sales to new and existing customers including renewing supporting maintenance agreements. We have also established relationships with large systems integrators such as Sagem Morpho to OEM our law enforcement solution utilizing their worldwide sales force. We will focus our sales efforts in the near term to establish IWS Law Enforcement as the integrated mug shot and LiveScan system adopted in as many countries, states, large counties and municipalities as possible. Once we have a system installed in a region, we intend to then sell additional systems or retrieval seats to other agencies within the primary customer’s region and in neighboring regions. In addition, we plan to market our integrated investigative modules to the customer, including Facial Recognition, Web and WitnessView. As customer databases of digital mug shots grow, we expect that the perceived value of our investigative modules, and corresponding revenues from sales of those modules, will also grow.

New Software as a Service Business Model

With the advent of cloud based computing, the proliferation of mobile devices which allow for mobile transactions across wide geographical areas, the emergence of inexpensive and reliable biometric capture devices and the need to secure access to data, product and services, the Company believes that the market for multi-biometric solutions will expand to encompass significant deployments of biometric systems in the commercial and consumer markets. The Company therefore intends to leverage the strength of its existing government clients who have deployed the Company’s products for large populations, as well as its foundational patent portfolio in the field of multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple biometric algorithms, to address the commercial and consumer market. As part of its marketing plan, the Company will offer new versions of its product suite on ~~a Software~~aSoftware as a Service (“SaaS”) model during 2012. This new business model, which is intended to supplement the Company’s existing business model, will allow new commercial and consumer clients to verify identity in order to access data, products or services from mobile and desktop devices.

~~-12-~~-9-

Table of Contents

~~SALES AND MARKETING~~

Sales and Marketing

We market and sell our products through our direct sales force and through indirect distribution channels, including systems integrators. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2011,~~2010, we had sales and account representatives based domestically in the District of Columbia, California and internationally in Canada and Mexico. Geographically, our sales and marketing force consisted of seven persons in the United States, one person in Canada and one person in Mexico.

We sell through a direct sales organization, which is supported by technical experts. Our technical experts are available by telephone and conduct on-site customer presentations in support of our sales professionals.

The typical sales cycle for IWS Biometric Engine and IWS Law Enforcement includes a pre-sale process to define the potential customer’s needs and budget, an on-site demonstration and conversations between the potential customer and existing customers. Government agencies are typically required to purchase large systems by including a list of requirements in a Request For Proposal, known as an “RFP,” and by allowing several companies to openly bid for the project by responding to the RFP. If our response is selected, we enter into negotiations for the contract and, if successful, ultimately receive a purchase order from the customer. This process can take anywhere from a few months to over a year.

Our Biometric and ID products are also sold to large integrators, direct via our sales force and to end users through distributors. Depending on the customer’s requirements, there may be instances that require an RFP. The sales cycle can vary from a few weeks to a year.

In addition to our direct sales force, we have developed relationships with a number of systems integrators who contract with government agencies for the installation and integration of large computer and communication systems. By acting as a subcontractor to these systems integrators, we are able to avoid the time consuming and often-expensive task of submitting proposals to government agencies, and we also gain access to large clients.

We also work with companies that offer complementary products, where value is created through product integration. Through teaming arrangements we are able to enhance our products and to expand our customer base through the relationships and contracts of our strategic partners.

We plan to continue to market and sell our products internationally. Some of the challenges and risks associated with international sales include the difficulty in protecting our intellectual property rights, difficulty in enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems and volatility and unpredictability in the political and economic conditions of foreign countries. We believe we can work to successfully overcome these challenges.

~~CUSTOMERS~~Competition

We have a wide variety of domestic and international customers. Most of our IWS Law Enforcement customers are government agencies at the federal, state and local levels in the United States. Our secure credential products are also being used in Australia, Canada, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines. In 2009, two customers accounted for approximately 23%, or $1,412,000 of our revenues. In 2010, one customer accounted for approximately 31%, or $1,803,000 of our revenues.

~~-13-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COMPETITION~~

The Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets

Due to the fragmented nature of the law enforcement and public safety market and the modular nature of our product suite, we face different degrees of competition with respect to each IWS Law Enforcement module. We believe the principal bases on which we compete with respect to all of our products are:

●·

the unique ability to integrate our modular products into a complete biometric, LiveScan, imaging and investigative system;

●·

our reputation as a reliable systems supplier;

●·

the usability and functionality of our products; and

●·

the responsiveness, availability and reliability of our customer support.

-10-

Table of Contents

Our law enforcement product line faces competition from other companies such as DataWorks Plus and Cogent Systems, Inc. Internationally, there are often a number of local companies offering solutions in most countries.

Secure Credential Market

Due to the breadth of our software offering in the secure credential market space, we face differing degrees of competition in certain market segments. The strength of our competitive position is based upon:

●·

our strong brand reputation with a customer base which includes small and medium-sized businesses, Fortune 500 corporations and large government agencies;

●·

the ease of integrating our technology into other complex applications; and

●·

the leveraged strength that comes from offering customers software tools, packaged solutions and Web-based service applications that support a wide range of hardware peripherals.

Our software faces competition from Datacard Corporation, a privately held manufacturer of hardware, software and consumables for the ID market as well as small, regionally based companies.

Biometric Market

The market to provide biometric systems to the identity management market is evolving and we face competition from a number of sources. We believe that the strength of our competitive position is based on:

●·

our ability to provide a system which enables the enrollment, management and authentication of multiple biometrics managing population databases of unlimited sizes;

●·

searches can be 1:1 (verification), 1:N (identification) and X:N (investigative); and N:N (database integrity);

●

the system is technology and biometric agnostic, enabling the use of biometric devices and algorithms from any vendor, and the support of the following biometric types: finger, face, iris, hand geometry, palm, DNA, signature, voice, and 3D face and retina; and

●·

we hold five patents covering our core multi-modal biometric and fusion technology, which we believe will give us a competitive advantage over our direct competitors who have little or no patent protection.

~~-15-~~Environmental Regulation

~~Table of Contents~~

Our business does not require us to comply with any particular environmental regulations.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock, you should consider carefully the specific risks detailed in this “Risk Factors” section ~~and any applicable prospectus or prospectus supplement, together with all of the other information contained in this Report~~ and any prospectus or prospectus supplement. If any of these risks occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed, the price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

~~Risks Related to Our Business and Industry~~

We have a history of significant recurring losses totaling approximately ~~$103.2~~$108 million at December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, and these losses may continue in the future.

As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had an accumulated deficit of ~~$103.2~~$108 million, and these losses may continue in the future. We expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expenses. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability, and we may never achieve profitability.

-12-

Table of Contents

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future.

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past. These fluctuations in operating results are the consequence of:

·	varying demand for and market acceptance of our technology and products;

·	changes in our product or customer mix;

·	the gain or loss of one or more key customers or their key customers, or significant changes in the financial condition of one or more of our key customers or their key customers;

·	our ability to introduce, certify and deliver new products and technologies on a timely basis;

·	the announcement or introduction of products and technologies by our competitors;

·	competitive pressures on selling prices;

·	costs associated with acquisitions and the integration of acquired companies, products and technologies;

·	our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies, products and technologies;

·	our accounting and legal expenses; and

·	general economic conditions.

These factors, some of which are not within our control, will likely continue in the future. To respond to these and other factors, we may need to make business decisions that could result in failure to meet financial expectations. If our quarterly operating results fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors, our stock price could drop suddenly and significantly. Most of our expenses, such as employee compensation, inventory and debt repayment obligations, are relatively fixed in the short term. Moreover, our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations regarding future revenue levels. As a result, if our revenue for a particular period were below our expectations, we would not be able to proportionately reduce our operating expenses for that period. Any revenue shortfall would have a disproportionately negative effect on our operating results for the period.

~~-16-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Our current ineligibility to use the Registration Statement on Form S-3 may affect our ability to finance our working capital requirements for the next twelve months~~.

As a result of the fact that we have not been able to remain current with our periodic filings with the SEC we have been ineligible to register shares of our common stock on the SEC’s short-form registration statement, Form S-3. Certain investors, for whom the ability to resell their shares relatively soon after they acquire them is important, may only be willing to participate in private financings by us if we can register their shares using a Form S-3. Therefore, our ineligibility to use Form S-3 could limit our ability to raise additional capital for at least the next 12 months or such longer period that we are ineligible to use the Form S-3.

~~We have experienced significant delays, and may continue to experience delays in the filing of our periodic reportswith the SEC, which could have a material adverse effect on us.~~

We have experienced significant delays in filing our restated financial statements for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2009 and our financial statements for subsequent fiscal periods to date, including the filing of this Annual Report for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. We are also required to file, but have not filed, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each of the interim periods of fiscal 2011. The delay in filing periodic reports with the SEC has been a factor in our ability to attract financing, and therefore execute our business plan. Continued delays in the filing of our periodic reports with the SEC could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We depend upon a small number of large system sales ranging from $100,000 to in excess of $2,000,000 and we may fail to achieve one or more large system sales in the future.

Historically, we have derived a substantial portion of our revenues from a small number of sales of large, relatively expensive systems, typically ranging in price from $100,000 to $2,000,000. If we fail to receive orders for these large systems in a given sales cycle on a consistent basis, our business could be significantly harmed. Further, our quarterly results are difficult to predict because we cannot predict in which quarter, if any, large system sales will occur in a given year. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not a good indication of our future performance. In some future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, in which case the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly.

Our lengthy sales cycle may cause us to expend significant resources for as long as one year in anticipation of a sale to certain customers, yet we still may fail to complete the sale.

When considering the purchase of a large computerized identity management system, potential customers of ours may take as long as eighteen months to evaluate different systems and obtain approval for the purchase. Under these circumstances, if we fail to complete a sale, we will have expended significant resources and received no revenue in return. Generally, customers consider a wide range of issues before committing to purchase our products, including product benefits, ability to operate with their current systems, product reliability and their own budgetary constraints. While potential customers are evaluating our products, we may incur substantial selling costs and expend significant management resources in an effort to accomplish potential sales that may never occur. In times of economic recession, our potential customers may be unwilling or unable to commit resources to the purchase of new and costly systems.

-13-

Table of Contents

A significant number of our customers and potential customers are government agencies that are subject to unique political and budgetary constraints and have special contracting requirements, which may affect our ability to obtain new and retain current government customers.

A significant number of our customers are government agencies. These agencies often do not set their own budgets and therefore have little control over the amount of money they can spend from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year. In addition, these agencies experience political pressure that may dictate the manner in which they spend money. Due to political and budgetary processes and other scheduling delays that may frequently occur relating to the contract or bidding process, some government agency orders may be canceled or substantially delayed, and the receipt of revenues or payments from these agencies may be substantially delayed. In addition, future sales to government agencies will depend on our ability to meet government contracting requirements, certain of which may be onerous or impossible to meet, resulting in our inability to obtain a particular contract. Common requirements in government contracts include bonding requirements, provisions permitting the purchasing agency to modify or terminate at will the contract without penalty, and provisions permitting the agency to perform investigations or audits of our business practices, any of which may limit our ability to enter into new contracts or maintain our current contracts.

~~-17-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

We occasionally rely on systems integrators to manage our large projects, and if these companies do not perform adequately, we may lose business.

We occasionally act as a subcontractor to systems integrators who manage large projects that incorporate our systems, particularly in foreign countries. We cannot control these companies, and they may decide not to promote our products or may price their services in such a way as to make it unprofitable for us to continue our relationship with them. Further, they may fail to perform under agreements with their customers, in which case we might lose sales to these customers. If we lose our relationships with these companies, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

If the patents we own or license, or our other intellectual property rights, do not adequately protect our products and technologies, we may lose market share to our competitors and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our rights to the technologies used in our products. We rely on patent protection, trade secrets, as well as a combination of copyright and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual arrangements to protect our technology. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. In addition, we cannot be assured that any of our current and future pending patent applications will result in the issuance of a patent to us. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) may deny or require significant narrowing of claims in our pending patent applications, and patents issued as a result of the pending patent applications, if any, may not provide us with significant commercial protection or issued in a form that is advantageous to us. We could also incur substantial costs in proceedings before the PTO. These proceedings could result in adverse decisions as to the claims included in our patents.

Our issued and licensed patents and those that may be issued or licensed in the future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing related products. Additionally, upon expiration of our issued or licensed patents, we may lose some of our rights to exclude others from making, using, selling or importing products using the technology based on the expired patents. We also must rely on contractual rights with the third parties that license technology to us to protect our rights in the technology licensed to us. Although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and technology, there is no assurance that competitors will not be able to design around our patents. We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. We cannot assure you that we can meaningfully protect all our rights in our unpatented proprietary technology or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary products or processes or otherwise gain access to our unpatented proprietary technology. We seek to protect our know-how and other unpatented proprietary technology with confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees. However, such agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements or in the event that our competitors discover or independently develop similar or identical designs or other proprietary information. In addition, we rely on the use of registered and common law trademarks with respect to the brand names of some of our products. Our common law trademarks provide less protection than our registered trademarks. Loss of rights in our trademarks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

-14-

Table of Contents

Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. If we fail to apply for intellectual property protection or if we cannot adequately protect our intellectual property rights in these foreign countries, our competitors may be able to compete more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our competitive position, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~-18-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

If third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, we may incur liabilities and costs and may have to redesign or discontinue selling certain products.

Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. We face the risk of claims that we have infringed on third parties’ intellectual property rights. Searching for existing intellectual property rights may not reveal important intellectual property and our competitors may also have filed for patent protection, which is not as yet a matter of public knowledge, or claimed trademark rights that have not been revealed through our availability searches. Our efforts to identify and avoid infringing on third parties’ intellectual property rights may not always be successful. Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could:

·	increase the cost of our products;

·	be expensive and time consuming to defend;

·	result in us being required to pay significant damages to third parties;

·	force us to cease making or selling products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

·	require us to redesign, reengineer or rebrand our products;

·	require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property, the terms of which may not be acceptable to us;

·	require us to indemnify third parties pursuant to contracts in which we have agreed to provide indemnification to such parties for intellectual property infringement claims;

·	divert the attention of our management; and

·	result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of the affected products until the litigation is resolved.

In addition, new patents obtained by our competitors could threaten a product’s continued life in the market even after it has already been introduced.

We operate in foreign countries and are exposed to risks associated with foreign political, economic and legal environments and with foreign currency exchange rates.

We have significant foreign operations. As a result, we are exposed to risks, including among others, risks associated with foreign political, economic and legal environments and with foreign currency exchange rates. Our results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in government policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflation measures, currency conversions, collection of receivables abroad and rates and methods of taxation.

We depend on key personnel, the loss of any of whom could materially adversely affect future operations.

Our success will depend to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees and any negative market or industry perception arising from the loss of such services could have a material adverse effect on us and the trading price of our common stock. Our business will also be dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Acquiring and keeping these personnel could prove more difficult or cost substantially more than estimated and we cannot be certain that we will be able to retain such personnel or attract a high caliber of personnel in the future.

~~-19-~~-15-

Table of Contents

We face competition from companies with greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and, if we are unable to compete effectively with these competitors, our market share may decline and our business could be harmed.

We face competition from other established companies. A number of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, significantly greater financial, technological, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements, more quickly develop new products or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. Likewise, their greater capabilities in these areas may enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the identity management solutions industry and compete more effectively on the basis of price and production. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition in the identity management solutions industry.

We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the type and quality of our products and the strength of our brand names, as well as many factors beyond our control. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of new products, any of which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Securities

Our common stock is no longer listed on the AMEX or the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board and is now traded on the OTC Pink Sheets.

In May of 2008 the AMEX removed the Company’s common stock from being listed on their exchange as we failed to comply with AMEX’s continued listing standards. In December of 2008 our common stock was removed from being quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board as we failed to timely file required reports with the SEC. As of the end of the third quarter of 2008 we were faced with limited funds for operations and were compelled to suspend SEC filings and the associated costs until such time as we had sufficient resources to cover ongoing operations and the expenses of maintaining compliance with SEC filing requirements. There is no assurance that we will be able to attain compliance with SEC filing requirements in the future, and if we are able to attain compliance, there is no assurance we will be able to maintain compliance. If we are not able to attain and maintain compliance with SEC reporting requirements for the minimum required periods, we will not be eligible for re-listing on the OTC markets or other exchanges.

The holders of our preferred stock have certain rights and privileges that are senior to our common stock, and we may issue additional shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval that could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the common stock.

Our Board of Directors (“Board”) has the authority to issue a total of up to four million shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including voting rights, of the preferred stock, which typically are senior to the rights of the common stockholders, without any further vote or action by the common stockholders. The rights of our common stockholders will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of the preferred stock that have been issued, or might be issued in the future. Preferred stock also could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. This could delay, defer, or prevent a change in control. Furthermore, holders of preferred stock may have other rights, including economic rights, senior to the common stock. As a result, their existence and issuance could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the common stock. We have in the past issued and may from time to time in the future issue, preferred stock for financing or other purposes with rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the common stock. As of ~~December 31, 2010,~~March 30, 2012, we had ~~three~~one series of preferred stock outstanding, Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”)~~, Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”) and Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred”)~~. ~~As a result of the consummation of the Qualified Financing, on December 20, 2011, our Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred automatically converted into shares of our common stock.~~

~~-20-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The provisions of our Series B Preferred prohibit the payment of dividends on the common stock unless the dividends on those preferred shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution or sale of our business, the holders of the Series B Preferred will be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the holders of common stock, initial distributions of $2.50 per share, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. Pursuant to the terms of our Series B Preferred we are obligated to pay cumulative cash dividends on shares of Series B Preferred from legally available funds at the annual rate of $0.2125 per share, payable in two semi-annual installments of $0.10625 each, which cumulative dividends must be paid prior to payment of any dividend on our common stock. As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had cumulative undeclared dividends on the Series B Preferred of approximately ~~$136,000.~~$187,000.

-16-

Table of Contents

Certain large shareholders may have certain personal interests that may affect the Company.

As a result of the shares issued to Goldman Capital Management and related entities (together, “Goldman”) in connection with the Qualified Financing, Goldman beneficially owns, in the aggregate, approximately 41.1% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. As a result, Goldman has the potential ability to exert influence over both the actions of the Board of Directors and the outcome of issues requiring approval by the Company’s shareholders. This concentration of ownership may have effects such as delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company that may be favored by other shareholders or preventing transactions in which shareholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current market prices.

Our stock price has been volatile, and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

There has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of equity securities, which is unrelated to the financial performance of the companies issuing the securities. These broad market fluctuations may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. You may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you pay for those shares due to fluctuations in the market price of our common stock caused by changes in our operating performance or prospects and other factors.

Some specific factors that may have a significant effect on our common stock market price include:

● ~~actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or future prospects;~~

● ~~our announcements or our competitors’ announcements of new products;~~

● ~~the public’s reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;~~

● ~~strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;~~

● ~~new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;~~

● ~~changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;~~

● ~~changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;~~

● ~~developments regarding our patents or proprietary rights or those of our competitors;~~

● ~~our inability to raise additional capital as needed;~~

● ~~substantial sales of common stock underlying warrants and preferred stock;~~

● ~~concern as to the efficacy of our products;~~

● ~~changes in financial markets or general economic conditions;~~

● ~~sales of common stock by us or members of our management team; and~~

·	●actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or future prospects;

·	our announcements or our competitors’ announcements of new products;

·	the public’s reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;

·	strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

·	new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;

·	changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

·	changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;

·	developments regarding our patents or proprietary rights or those of our competitors;

·	our inability to raise additional capital as needed;

·	substantial sales of common stock underlying warrants and preferred stock;

·	concern as to the efficacy of our products;

·	changes in financial markets or general economic conditions;

·	sales of common stock by us or members of our management team; and

·	changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings estimates regarding our common stock, other comparable companies or our industry generally.

~~-21-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Our future sales of our common stock could adversely affect its price and our future capital-raising activities could involve the issuance of equity securities, which would dilute shareholders’ investments and could result in a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

We may sell securities in the public or private equity markets if and when conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at that time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital. We may issue additional common stock in future financing transactions or as incentive compensation for our executive management and other key personnel, consultants and advisors. Issuing any equity securities would be dilutive to the equity interests represented by our then-outstanding shares of common stock. The market price for our common stock could decrease as the market takes into account the dilutive effect of any of these issuances. Furthermore, we may enter into financing transactions at prices that represent a substantial discount to the market price of our common stock. A negative reaction by investors and securities analysts to any discounted sale of our equity securities could result in a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

-17-

Table of Contents

~~The sale of our common stock upon exercise of certain registration rights previously granted in connection with past unregistered offerings may adversely affect the price of our common stock~~.

We have agreed to register with the SEC certain shares of our common stock, which we issued in unregistered offerings, including shares of common stock issued upon exercise of certain warrants and shares issued in connection with the Qualified Financing. Immediately following registration, these shares may be freely sold in the open market, subject to trading restrictions to which our affiliates holding the shares may be subject from time to time. We expect that we also will be required to register any securities sold in future private financings. Additionally, the number of shares of our common stock underlying issued and outstanding warrants and preferred stock registered under prior registration statements, many of which are now available for resale under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, is substantial and sales of such underlying stock could cause significant dilution. The sale of a significant amount of shares in the open market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline or become highly volatile.

Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate of incorporation authorizes preferred stock, which carries special rights, including voting and dividend rights. With these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not enter into a “business combination” with that person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of control. For purposes of Section 203, “interested stockholder” means, generally, someone owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in Section 203.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid on the common stock for the foreseeable future. The payment of any cash dividend by us will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, capital, regulatory requirements and financial condition. Furthermore, the terms of our Series B Preferred directly limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

~~-22-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM IB.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 our corporate headquarters were located in San Diego, California where we occupied approximately 5,134 square feet of office space. This facility is leased for a thirty-six month term at a cost of approximately ~~$4,492 per month, rising to~~ $9,254 per month as of December 31, 2011 with escalating payments in ~~January of 2011.~~years 2012 and 2013. We occupy 6,768 square feet in Ottawa, Province of Ontario, Canada. These premises are leased until September 2013, at a cost of approximately $6,768 CAD per month. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 we also occupied 6,024 square feet of office space in Portland, Oregon at a cost of approximately $11,375 per month and continues through October 2012, and as of December 31, 2011 we occupy approximately 190 square feet of office space in Mexico City, Mexico. Our lease for this facility is for an indefinite term at a cost of approximately $1,300 per month.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

WeCurrently, we are ~~periodically engaged~~not involved in ~~litigation in the ordinary course of business and do not believe that~~ any ~~of such litigation is~~ material ~~to our ongoing operations.~~legal proceedings.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

~~-23-~~-18-

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock does not trade on an established securities exchange. Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “IWSY” on the ~~OTC~~ Pink Sheets.

The following table sets forth the high and low ~~sales prices per share~~bid information for our common stock for for each quarter in 2011 and 2010, which reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and ~~2009:~~may not represent actual transactions:

2011 Fiscal Quarters	High		Low
First Quarter	$	1.70	$	0.78
Second Quarter	$	1.45	$	0.91
Third Quarter	$	1.25	$	0.56
Fourth Quarter	$	0.80	$	0.50

2010 Fiscal Quarters	High		Low
First Quarter	$	0.99	$	0.73
Second Quarter	$	0.92	$	0.46
Third Quarter	$	0.60	$	0.27
Fourth Quarter	$	0.98	$	0.30

2009 Fiscal Quarters High Low
First Quarter $ 0.30 $ 0.14
Second Quarter $ 0.69 $ 0.20
Third Quarter $ 0.95 $ 0.45
Fourth Quarter $ 0.88 $ 0.60

~~There is no public trading market for our preferred stock.~~

Holders

As of ~~December 1, 2011, there were~~March 22, 2012, we had approximately ~~1,400~~212 holders of record of our common stock. A significant number of our shares were held in street name and, as such, we believe that the actual number of beneficial owners is significantly higher.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common ~~stock~~stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends ~~on our shares of common stock~~ in the foreseeable future. ~~We are obligated~~Any future determination to ~~pay cumulative~~declare cash dividends ~~on shares of Series B Preferred from legally available funds~~will be made at the ~~annual rate~~discretion of ~~$0.2125 per share, payable in two semi-annual installments~~our board of ~~$0.10625 each, which cumulative dividends must be paid prior to payment of any dividend~~directors and will depend on our ~~common stock.~~ financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of approximately ~~$136,000~~$187,000 relating to our Series B ~~Preferred, approximately $756,000 relating to our Series C Preferred, and approximately $575,000 relating to our Series D~~ Preferred. As a result of the consummation of the Qualified Financing, as of December 20, 2011, the Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred, including accrued but unpaid dividends were converted into 11,768,525 shares of our common stock.

-19-

Table of Contents

Repurchases

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during fiscal ~~2010~~2011 or ~~2009.~~

~~-24-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

2010.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

For a discussion of our equity compensation plans, please see Item 12 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable. We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us which attempt to advise interested parties of the factors which affect our business, including (without limitation) the disclosures made under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors,” and in the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Developments

New Software as a Service Business Model.

With the advent of cloud based computing, the proliferation of mobile devices which allow for mobile transactions across wide geographical areas, the emergence of inexpensive and reliable biometric capture devices and the need to secure access to data, product and services, ~~the Company believes~~we believe that the market for multi-biometric solutions will expand to encompass significant deployments of biometric systems in the commercial and consumer markets. ~~The Company~~We therefore ~~intends~~intend to leverage the strength of ~~its~~our existing government clients who have deployed the Company’s products for large populations, as well as its foundational patent portfolio in the field of multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple biometric algorithms, to address the commercial and consumer market. As part of its marketing plan, ~~the Company~~we will offer new versions of ~~its~~our product suite on a Software as a Service (“SaaS”) model during 2012. This new business model, which is intended to supplement ~~the Company’s~~our existing business model, will allow new commercial and consumer clients to verify identity in order to access data, products or services from mobile and desktop devices.

Additional Intellectual Property.

~~The Company is~~We are a pioneer in inventing the technology of using multi-biometrics on a seamless and integrated platform, in addition to “fusing” multiple biometrics into a common or fused score for greater reliability in authenticating identity. ~~The Company believes it has~~We believe we have the foundational patents on the use of multiple biometrics and fusing on such a platform and ~~continues~~continue to be an IP leader in the space. It is ~~the Company’s~~our belief that this intellectual property leadership will create a sustainable competitive advantage. In addition to ~~its~~our eight issued U.S. and foreign patents, ~~the Company~~we recently filed three new patent applications surrounding new “Anonymous Matching” technologies. These technologies will allow biometric matching for identity verification while protecting the privacy of an individual. It is ~~the Company’s~~our belief that such technology will be critical to providing biometric management solutions for the consumer market where privacy protection has been a historical issue and barrier to biometric adoption.

-20-

Table of Contents

Consummation of Financing.

On December 20, 2011, ~~the Company~~we consummated an equity financing resulting in gross proceeds of $10.0 million (“Qualified Financing”), including the $750,000 of promissory notes converted into the Qualified Financing. In connection with the Qualified Financing, ~~the Company~~we issued ~~20.0 million~~20,000,000 shares of ~~its~~our common stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase 12,207,500 shares of ~~its~~ common stock exercisable for $0.50 per share (“Warrants”)., which number includes 2,207,500 shares issuable upon exchange of warrants issued to MDB Capital Group in consideration for acting as placement agent in connection with the Qualified Financing. The Warrants expire five years from the date of grant. In connection with the Qualified Financing, we also issued 90,000 shares of common stock and a warrant exercisable for 45,000 shares of common stock in lieu of cash in payment for legal fees related to the Qualified Financing. That Warrant also has a five year life and is exercisable for $0.50 per share. Further, warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50, which expire two years from the date of grant, were issued to a significant investor to cover certain expenses related to and in anticipation of the Qualified Financing.

We evaluated the warrants issued pursuant to the Qualified Financing under the provisions of ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity-Scope and Scope Exceptions” and determined that 12,252,500 of the warrants require derivative liability classification. Accordingly, we recorded approximately $5,626,000 in derivative liability based on the grant date fair value of the warrants as determined by the Black Scholes valuation model.

As a result of the Qualified Financing, ~~the Company’s~~our Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”) and Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred”) was automatically converted into 11,768,525 shares of common stock. In addition, in connection with the Qualified Financing, (i) the anti-dilution provision contained in certain of ~~the Company's~~our existing warrants were amended resulting in such warrants no longer qualifying as derivative liabilities; and (ii) a significant investor ("Investor") exchanged $4.5 million principal amount of our convertible promissory notes ~~of the Company~~ ("Exchanged Notes"), and accrued but unpaid interest on the Exchanged Notes and on an additional $2.25 million in promissory notes, into 9,774,559 shares of ~~the Company’s~~our common stock ("Exchange Shares"). The Investor also agreed to convert $750,000 principal amount of additional promissory notes held by the Investor and invest the proceeds into the Qualified Financing. ~~The Company is obligated to file~~We filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~or before~~ February ~~20,~~10, 2012 to register for resale the Shares and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants.

~~-25-~~

~~Table~~ We anticipate that registration filing going “effective” shortly after the filing of ~~Contents~~

The net proceeds from the Qualified Financing, approximately $9.2 million, will be used for (i) the customization of identity management products for enterprise and consumer applications; (ii) further development of intellectual property; (iii) development of SaaS capabilities for existing products; (iv) the payment of $1.5 million principal amount of convertible promissory notes; and (v) for working capital and general corporate purposes.this Form 10-K.

Overview

~~The Company is~~We are a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions. Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, ~~the Company creates~~we create software that provides a highly reliable indication of a person’s identity. Our “flagship” product is our patented IWS Biometric Engine®. Scalable for small city business or worldwide deployment, our IWS Biometric Engine is a multi-biometric software platform that is hardware and algorithm independent, enabling the enrollment and management of unlimited population sizes. It allows a user to utilize one or more biometrics on a seamlessly integrated platform. Our products are used to manage and issue secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver licenses and access control credentials. Our products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot, fingerprint LiveScan and investigative capabilities. We also provide comprehensive authentication security software using biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or computer networks or Internet sites. Biometric technology is now an integral part of all markets we address and all of our products are integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine.

While we have historically marketed our products to the government market at the federal, state and local levels, the emergence of cloud based computing - a mobile market that demands increased security and interoperable systems, and the proven success of our products in the government market, will enable us to enlarge our target market focus to include the emerging consumer and non-government enterprise marketplace.

-21-

Table of Contents

Our biometric technology is a core software component of an organization’s security infrastructure and includes a multi-biometric identity management solution for enrolling, managing, identifying and verifying the identities of people by the physical characteristics of the human body. We develop, sell and support various identity management capabilities within government (federal, state and local), law enforcement, commercial enterprises, and transportation and aviation markets for identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric Engine is a patented biometric identity management software platform for multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing population databases of virtually unlimited sizes. It is hardware agnostic and can utilize different types of biometric algorithms. It allows different types of biometrics to be operated at the same time on a seamlessly integrated platform. It is also offered as a Software Development Kit (SDK) based search engine, enabling developers and system integrators to implement a biometric solution or integrate biometric capabilities into existing applications without having to derive biometric functionality from pre-existing applications. The IWS Biometric Engine combined with our secure credential platform, IWS EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive, integrated biometric and secure credential solution that can be leveraged for high-end applications such as passports, driver licenses, national IDs, and other secure documents.

Our law enforcement solutions enable agencies to quickly capture, archive, search, retrieve, and share digital images, fingerprints and other biometrics as well as criminal history records on a stand-alone, networked, wireless or Web-based platform. We develop, sell and support a suite of modular software products used by law enforcement and public safety agencies to create and manage criminal history records and to investigate crime. Our IWS Law Enforcement solution consists of five software modules: Capture and Investigative modules, which provide a criminal booking system with related databases as well as the ability to create and print mug photo/SMT image lineups and electronic mugbooks; a Facial Recognition module, which uses biometric facial recognition to identify suspects; a Web module, which provides access to centrally stored records over the Internet in a connected or wireless fashion; and a LiveScan module, which incorporates LiveScan capabilities into IWS Law Enforcement providing integrated fingerprint and palm print biometric management for civil and law enforcement use. The IWS Biometric Engine is also available to our law enforcement clients and allows them to capture and search using other biometrics such as iris or DNA.

~~-26-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Our secure credential solutions empower customers to create secure and smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We develop, sell and support software and design systems which utilize digital imaging and biometrics in the production of photo identification cards, credentials and identification systems. Our products in this market consist of IWS EPI Suite and IWS EPI Builder (SDK). These products allow for the production of digital identification cards and related databases and records and can be used by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations or governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS Biometric Engine to our secure credential product line.

Our enterprise authentication software includes the IWS Desktop Security product which is a comprehensive authentication management infrastructure solution providing added layers of security to workstations, networks and systems through advanced encryption and authentication technologies. IWS Desktop Security is optimized to enhance network security and usability, and uses multi-factor authentication methods to protect access, verify identity and help secure the computing environment without sacrificing ease-of-use features such as quick login. Additionally, IWS Desktop Security provides an easy integration with various smart card-based credentials including the Common Access Card (CAC), Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12), Personal Identity Verification (PIV) credential, and Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) with an organization’s access control process. IWS Desktop Security provides the crucial end-point component of a Logical Access Control System (LACS), and when combined with a Physical Access Control System (PACS), organizations benefit from a complete door to desktop access control and security model.

~~CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES~~Critical Accounting Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to a company’s financial condition and results of operations, and if it requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application.

-22-

Table of Contents

Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, calculation of the Company’s tax provision, inventory obsolescence reserve, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, accounting for loss contingencies, recoverability of goodwill and acquired intangible assets and amortization periods, assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of share based payments, assumptions used in the application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair value of derivative liabilities and revenue and cost of revenues recognized under the percentage of completion method.

The following are our critical accounting policies because we believe they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require critical management judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making these estimates, our reported financial condition and results of operations for future periods could be materially affected. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on ~~page F-13.~~

Revenue Recognition. Our revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenue is a key component of our consolidated results of operations. We recognize revenue from the following major revenue sources:

● ~~Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant customization~~

·	Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant customization

● ~~Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization;~~

·	Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization;

● ~~Software licensing;~~

·	Software licensing;

● ~~Sales of computer hardware and identification media; and~~

·	Sales of computer hardware and identification media; and

● ~~Post contract customer support (PCS)~~

·	Post contract customer support (PCS)

~~-27-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are consistent with U.S. GAAP including ~~ASC~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition”, ASC 605-35 “Revenue Recognition, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”, “Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, and ASC 605-25 “Revenue Recognition, Multiple Element Arrangements”. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

We recognize revenue and profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts involving significant amount of hardware and software customization using the percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs at completion. Revenue from contracts for which we cannot reliably estimate total costs or there are not significant amounts of customization are recognized upon completion. Determining when a contract should be accounted for using the percentage of completion method involves judgment. Critical items that are considered in this process are the degree of customization and related labor hours necessary to complete the required work as well as ongoing estimates of the future labor hours needed to complete the contract. We also generate non-recurring revenue from the licensing of our software. Software license revenue is recognized upon the execution of a license agreement, upon deliverance, when fees are fixed and determinable, collectability is probable and when all other significant obligations have been fulfilled. We also generate revenue from the sale of computer hardware and identification media. Revenue for these items is recognized upon delivery of these products to the customer. ~~Our~~The Company’s revenue from periodic maintenance agreements is generally recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods provided no significant obligations remain and collectability of the related receivable is probable. Pricing of maintenance contracts is consistent period to period and calculated as a percentage of the software or hardware revenue which approximates 15% annually. Amounts collected in advance for maintenance services are included in current liabilities under "Deferred revenues". Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from revenue.

For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page ~~F-9.~~F-8.

-23-

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We provide an allowance for our accounts receivable for estimated losses that may result from our customers’ inability to pay. We determine the amount of allowance by analyzing historical losses, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, the age of the accounts receivable balances and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Our accounts receivable balance was $348,000, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,000 at December 31, 2011. Our accounts receivable balance was $239,000, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,000 at December 31, 2010. ~~Our accounts receivable balance was $627,000, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,000 at December 31, 2009.~~

Valuation of Goodwill, Other Intangible and Long-Lived Assets. The Company accounts for its intangible assets under the provisions of ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”. In accordance with ASC 350, intangible assets with a definite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360-10-05 and intangible assets with an indefinite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360. In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill, or the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired ~~is no longer amortized but~~ is tested for impairment using a fair value approach at the “reporting unit” level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below that operating segment (referred to as a component) if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at the component level. The Company’s reporting unit is at the entity level. The Company recognizes an impairment charge for any amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value. The Company uses fair value methodologies to establish fair values.

We assess impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

~~• Significant underperformance relative to historical or expected future operating results;~~

·	Significant underperformance relative to historical or expected future operating results;

·	Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy of our overall business; and

·	Significant negative industry or economic trends.

~~• Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy of our overall business; and~~

~~• Significant negative industry or economic trends.~~

The Company annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a need, tests the carrying amount of goodwill for impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year. A two-step impairment test is used to first identify potential goodwill impairment and then measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. These tests were conducted by determining and comparing the fair value, employing the market approach, of the Company’s reporting units to the carrying value of the reporting unit. In 2006, the Company determined that its only reporting unit is Identity Management. Based on the results of these impairment tests, the Company determined that its goodwill assets were not impaired as of December 31, ~~2010 and 2009.~~2011.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.

There are many management assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment loss, and estimates using different, but reasonable, assumptions could produce significantly different results. Significant assumptions include estimates of future levels of revenues and operating expenses. Therefore, the timing and recognition of impairment losses by us in the future, if any, may be highly dependent upon our estimates and assumptions. There can be no assurance that goodwill impairment will not occur in the future.

Goodwill and other net intangible assets amounted to approximately $3,479,000 and $3,494,000 at December 31, ~~2010.~~2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Other Income, Net

~~Other Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the year ended December 31, 2011 we recognized other income of $25,000. That $25,000 is primarily due to miscellaneous receipts at our German sales office. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized other income of $330,000 and other expense of $2,000. ~~For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized~~Total other income of ~~$473,000 and other expense of $28,000. Other income~~$328,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 is comprised of approximately $280,000 from the reduction of previously accrued liquidated damages due to the expiration of the ~~statue~~statute of limitations; $10,000 for the application of forfeiture account balances of ~~the Company’s~~our 401(k) plan against the accrued employer match; $5,000 from the reduction of the allowance for doubtful accounts; $10,000 from the write-off of certain long-outstanding trade accounts payable; and $25,000 in income on previously derecognized accounts receivables offset by $2,000 in losses on the disposal of certain fixed assets. ~~Other~~

Income Tax Expense

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded a benefit from income taxes of $19,000 as compared to expense of $126,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 is comprised of approximately $454,000 from the negotiated settlement of certain trade accounts payable at amounts less than their carrying value, $13,000 in reductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts, $6,000 in insurance reimbursements offset by other expense of $28,000 related to adjustments to previously established exit activity reserved related to the closure of our German sales office.2010.

~~Income Tax Expense.~~ During the year ended December 31, ~~2010, we recorded a provision~~2011, our benefit for income taxes of ~~$126,000 as compared to $0 during the year ended December 31, 2009.~~

~~During the year ended December 31, 2010, our provision for income taxes of $126,000~~$19,000 related to taxes on income generated in certain foreign jurisdictions offset by research and development tax credits generated in certain foreign jurisdictions.

We have incurred consolidated pre-tax losses during the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, and have incurred operating losses in all periods prior to 2009. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that a tax benefit from such losses will not be realized. Accordingly, we did not record a benefit for income taxes for these periods.

-32-

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On December 20, 2011, we consummated an equity financing resulting in gross proceeds of $10.0 million (“Qualified Financing”), including the $750,000 of promissory notes converted into the Qualified Financing. In connection with the Qualified Financing, we issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase 12,207,500 shares of common stock exercisable for $0.50 per share (“Warrants”), which number includes 2,207,500 shares issuable upon exchange of warrants issued to MDB Capital Group in consideration for acting as placement agent in connection with the Qualified Financing. We also issued 90,000 shares of common stock and a warrant exercisable for 45,000 shares of common stock in lieu of cash in payment for legal fees related to the Qualified Financing. We also issued a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50, which expires two years from the date of grant, to a significant investor to cover certain expenses related to and in anticipation of the Qualified Financing. The net proceeds from the Qualified Financing were approximately $8,544,000, of which, $1,500,000 was then used to repay certain convertible notes payable. As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, all debt other than the $110,000 in related party notes payable had been converted to common stock or repaid. In addition, in connection with the Qualified Financing, (i) the anti-dilution provision contained in certain of our existing warrants were amended resulting in such warrants no longer qualifying as derivative liabilities; and (ii) a significant investor ("Investor") exchanged $4.5 million principal amount of convertible promissory notes of the Company ("Exchanged Notes"), and accrued but unpaid interest on the Exchanged Notes and on an additional $2.25 million in promissory notes, into 9,774,559 shares of our common stock ("Exchange Shares"). The Investor also agreed to convert $750,000 principal amount of additional promissory notes held by the Investor and invest the proceeds into the Qualified Financing.

At December 31, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $6,773,000 and accounts receivable, net of $348,000. As of December 31, 2011, we had ~~total current assets~~positive working capital of ~~$411,000 and total current liabilities~~$2,948,000 which included $1,066,000 of ~~$4,407,000, or~~deferred revenue. This compares to negative working capital of ~~$3,996,000. At December 31, 2010~~$3,996,000 during the corresponding period in 2010. Historically, our principal sources of cash have included customer payments from the sale of our products, proceeds from the issuance of common and ~~2009,~~preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of debt. Our principal uses of cash have included cash used in operations, payments relating to purchases of property and equipment and repayments of borrowings. We expect that our principal uses of cash in the future will be for product development including customization of identity management products for enterprise and consumer applications, further development of intellectual property, development of SaaS capabilities for existing products as well as general working capital and capital expenditure requirements. We expect that, as our revenues grow, our sales and marketing and research and development expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, we ~~had available~~will need to generate significant net revenues to achieve and sustain income from operations.

Management believes that the Company’s current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of ~~$103,000~~this filing and ~~$342,000, respectively.~~that we will have sufficient liquidity to fund its business and meet its contractual obligations over a period beyond the next 12 months.

~~-37-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was ~~$2,070,000~~$2,269,000 during the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 as compared to ~~$2,874,000~~$2,070,000 for the corresponding period in ~~2009. We~~2010. The cash used in operations of $2,269,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 was primarily driven by a loss from operations of $2,343,000. Further, we had a net loss of $3,180,000 in 2011 largely driven by interest expense of $4,851,000, of which, approximately $2,250,000 relates to the write-off of the unamortized note discount and beneficial conversion feature related to the convertible debt that was converted to common stock in December 2011 as part of the Qualified Financing. This expense was offset by approximately $3,970,000 in non-cash income resulting from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities. Changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities in total decreased the net cash used in operations by approximately $103,000 due largely to a $570,000 increase in accrued expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we used cash to fund net losses of $2,720,000, excluding non-cash expenses (depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of additional financing obligation and derivative liabilities, amortization of debt discount, stock-based compensation, loss on debt modification and financing expense incurred from the issuance of derivative instruments) of $2,329,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. We used cash to fund net losses of $1,830,000, excluding non-cash expenses (depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of additional financing obligation and derivative liabilities, amortization of debt discount, stock-based compensation, loss on debt modification and financing expense incurred from the issuance of derivative instruments) of $10,806,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.$2,329,000. For the year ended December 31, 2010 we generated cash of $617,000 through reductions in current assets and generated cash of $34,000 through increases in current liabilities (excluding debt). ~~For the year ended December 31, 2009, we used cash~~

-33-

Table of ~~$222,000 from increases in current assets and used cash of $822,000 through decreases in current liabilities (excluding debt).~~Contents

Investing Activities

For the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, we used cash of ~~$13,000~~$11,000 and ~~$16,000,~~$13,000, respectively, to fund capital expenditures of computer equipment, ~~and~~ software and furniture and fixtures. The level of equipment purchases resulted primarily from continued growth of the business and replacement of older equipment.

Financing Activities

~~Net~~We generated cash ~~provided by~~of $9.0 million from financing activities ~~was $1,820,000~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2010. We~~2011 compared to $1.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The $9.0 million generated ~~cash~~in 2011 was the result of ~~$5,750,000~~$8.5 million in net proceeds from ~~our issuance~~the Qualified Financing offset by a net outflow of ~~convertible~~$250,000 to repay certain notes ~~payable with warrants.~~payable. We also ~~generated cash~~received $655,000 in proceeds from the exercise of ~~$500,000 from our issuance~~warrants to purchase 1,310,000 shares of common ~~stock pursuant to warrant exercises. In~~stock. For the year ended December 31, 2010, ~~we used cash of $4,430,000 for~~ the ~~repayment of our secured notes payable. Net~~net cash provided by financing activities of $1.8 million was ~~$3,191,000 for~~ the ~~year ended December 31, 2009. We generated cash~~result of ~~$2,325,000 from our issuance~~net borrowings in the form of secured notes ~~payable. We also generated cash~~payable of ~~$1,370,000~~$1.3 million combined with $500,000 in proceeds from ~~our issuance~~the exercise of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common ~~stock pursuant~~stock.

Debt

As of December 31, 2011 we had $110,000 in outstanding debt compared to ~~warrant exercises. In 2009, we used cash~~$5,610,000 (exclusive of ~~$350,000 to repay notes a portion~~$4,073,000 in unamortized debt discounts) as of ~~our secured notes payable and incurred financing related expenses of $154,000.~~December 31, 2010.

Factors That May Affect Future Financial Condition and Liquidity

Currently our cash commitments include normal recurring trade payables, expense accruals, minimum royalty obligations, debt and operating and capital leases, all of which are currently expected to be funded through existing working capital. Aside from these recurring operating expenses, we expect to incur approximately $100,000 in capital expenditures in fiscal 2011.

~~During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we were faced with limited funds for operations. As a result, we took measures to reduce our operating costs.~~ As a result of the consummation of the Qualified Financing in December 2011, we believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of the filing of this Annual Report and that we will have sufficient liquidity to fund our business and meet our contractual obligations over a period beyond the next 12 months. However, we may be required to obtain additional financing in order to fund our continued operations. Due to the tightening of the credit markets, general economic conditions, ~~our SEC filing delinquencies~~ and other economic and business factors, this financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Although we cannot accurately anticipate the effect of inflation or foreign exchange markets on our operations, we do not believe these external economic forces have had, or are likely in the foreseeable future to have, a material impact on our results of operations.

~~-38-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose or variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we did not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As a result, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. We do not have relationships and transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties except as disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report.

~~Quarter-Over-Quarter Comparisons~~

The following tables set forth condensed unaudited statement of operations for each of the six quarters beginning January 1, 2009 and ended September 30, 2010. The following quarterly information is intended to supplement our discussion and analysis of the results of operations provided above and should be read in conjunction with such discussion and our audited financial statements and the notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

~~-39-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS~~

~~(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)~~

~~(UNAUDITED)~~

Quarter Ended

March
31

June
30

Sept.
30

March
31

June
30

Sept.
30

2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010
Revenues:
  Product $ 675 $ 999 $ 241 $ 1,360 $ 511 $ 769
  Maintenance 638 646 659 668 640 653
1,313 1,645 900 2,028 1,151 1,422
Cost of revenues:
  Product 284 317 167 528 144 249
  Maintenance 209 199 201 247 254 198

Gross profit 820 1,129 532 1,253 753 975

Operating expenses:
  General and administrative 609 595 555 697 680 512
  Sales and marketing 429 451 376 392 381 385
  Research and development 587 553 582 697 666 576
  Depreciation and amortization 33 30 19 14 12 13
1,658 1,629 1,532 1,800 1,739 1,486

Loss from operations (838 ) (500 ) (1,000 ) (547 ) (986 ) (511 )

Interest expense, net 102 180 212 242 334 60
Change in fair value of financing obligation 152 450 438 229 (744 ) (38 )
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities (748 ) 5,179 756 477 (4,154 ) (506 )
Loss on debt modification - 750 - - - 1,100
Financing expense - - 1,371 - - -
Other income, net (11 ) (11 ) (124 ) (17 ) (284 ) (12 )

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes (333 ) (7,048 ) (3,653 ) (1,478 ) 3,862 (1,115 )

Income tax expense - - - - 197 2
Income (loss) from operations (333 ) (7,048 ) (3,653 ) (1,478 ) 3,665 (1,117 )

Net income (loss) $ (333 ) $ (7,048 ) $ (3,653 ) $ (1,478 ) $ 3,665 $ (1,117 )
Preferred dividends (99 ) (100 ) (101 ) (99 (98 ) (99 )
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ (432 ) $ (7,148 ) $ (3,754 ) $ (1,577 ) $ 3,567 $ (1,216 )

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share - see note 2
Income (loss) from operations $ (0.02 ) $ (0.39 ) $ (0.18 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.16 $ (0.05 )
Preferred dividends - (0.01 ) (0.01 ) - - -
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common shareavailable to common shareholders
$ (0.02 ) $ (0.40 ) $ (0.19 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.16 (1) $ (0.05 )

~~(1)~~ ~~For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, amount presented is only basic loss per share.~~

~~-40-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Restatement of Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009~~

The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to reflect the Company’s adoption of ASC 815 which significantly changes how the Company accounts for derivative liabilities and related gains and losses from the change in fair value of these derivative liabilities.

Beginning January 1, 2009, the Company is required to account for the embedded derivative related to the conversion feature in its Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred and certain warrants as derivative liabilities (collectively the “Derivative Liabilities”). The Company is required to mark to market at the end of each reporting period the value of the Derivative Liabilities. The Company revalues these Derivative Liabilities at the end of each reporting period by using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The periodic change in value of the Derivative Liabilities is recorded as either non-cash derivative income (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants decrease) or as non-cash derivative expense (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants increase). Although the values of the embedded derivative and warrants are affected by interest rates, the remaining contractual conversion period and the Company’s stock volatility, the primary cause of the change in the values of will be the value of the Company’s common stock. If the stock price goes up, the value of these derivatives will generally increase and if the stock price goes down the value of these derivatives will generally decrease.

The Company’s Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred and certain warrants contain anti-dilution provisions which results in these instruments no longer being deemed to be indexed to the Company’s own stock. As a result of the restatement, amounts previously classified in equity were reclassified to liabilities as of January 1, 2009. For each subsequent reporting quarter, the value of the Derivative Liabilities was revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 815 as of January 1, 2009 was a decrease in additional paid in capital of $5,836,000, a decrease in accumulated deficit of $1,709,000 and an increase in Derivative Liabilities of $4,127,000. The resulting impact of this accounting change as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is an increase in note discount of $288,000, a decrease in the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders of $715,000, a decrease in additional paid-in capital of $241,000, a decrease in accumulated deficit of $715,000 and a decrease in Derivative Liabilities of $186,000.

The revisions relate to non-operating and non-cash items as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009. ASC 815 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements for periods ended December 31, 2008 or earlier.

~~-41-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table summarizes the effect of the restated adjustments on amounts previously reported as of, and for the quarter ended March 31 2009 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):~~

As Previously As
($ in thousands) Reported Adjustments Restated
Total assets $ 5,340 $ - $ 5,340

Total current liabilities $ 5,111 $ - $ 5,111

Secured note payable, net of discount 485 (321 ) (2) 316
119 (5)
33 (4)

Additional financing obligation, net of discount 440 (119 ) (5) 321
Derivative liabilities - 4,127 (1) 3,941
562 (2)
(748 ) (3)
Pension obligation 1,073 - 1,073

Total liabilities 7,109 3,653 10,762

Stockholders' equity

Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock 2 - 2
Series C convertible non-redeemable preferred stock - - -
Series D convertible non-redeemable preferred stock - - -

Common stock 180 - 180

Additional paid in capital 86,316 (5,836 ) (1) 80,239
(241 ) (2)
Treasury Stock (64 ) (64 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income 46 46

Accumulated deficit (88,249 ) 748 (3) (85,824 )
(33 ) (4)
1,709 (1)
Total Shareholders' deficit (1,769 ) (3,653 ) (5,422 )

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit $ 5,340 $ - $ 5,340

The effect of the restatement adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is set forth in the following table:
As Previously As
($ in thousands) Reported Adjustments Restated
Loss from operations $ (838 ) $ - $ (838 )

Interest expense, net 131 29 (4)(6) 102
Change in fair value of financing obligation 90 62 (6) 152
Other income, net (11 ) - (11 )
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities - (748 ) (3) (748 )

Net loss (1,048 ) 715 (333 )

Preferred dividends (99 ) - (99 )
Beneficial conversion feature on preferred stocks - - -
Net loss available to common shareholders $ (1,147 ) $ 715 $ (432 )

Basic and diluted loss per common share
Continuing operations $ (0.06 ) $ 0.04 $ (0.02 )
Preferred dividends - - -
Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.06 ) $ 0.04 $ (0.02 )

~~(1)~~ ~~to record the cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings to reclassify the fair value of the derivatives as a liability~~

~~(2)~~ ~~to record the fair value of warrants issued February 12, 2009 as a derivative liability~~

~~(3)~~ ~~to record the change in fair value of derivative liabilities~~

~~(4)~~ ~~to record the change in interest expense resulting from changes to note discount and related amortization caused by revaluation of warrants issued with debt~~

~~(5)~~ ~~to record change in discount on additional financing obligation~~

~~(6)~~ ~~to record reclassification of accretion of minimum portion of additional financing obligation~~

~~-43-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Restatement of Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009~~

The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to reflect the Company’s adoption of ASC 815 which significantly changes how the Company accounts for Derivative Liabilities and related gains and losses from the change in fair value of these Derivative Liabilities.

Beginning January 1, 2009, the Company is required to account for the embedded derivative related to the conversion feature in its Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred and certain warrants as Derivative Liabilities. The Company is required to mark to market at the end of each reporting period the value of the Derivative Liabilities. The Company revalues these Derivative Liabilities at the end of each reporting period by using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The periodic change in value of the Derivative Liabilities is recorded as either non-cash derivative income (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants decrease) or as non-cash derivative expense (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants increase). Although the values of the embedded derivative and warrants are affected by interest rates, the remaining contractual conversion period and the Company’s stock volatility, the primary cause of the change in the values of will be the value of the Company’s common stock. If the stock price goes up, the value of these derivatives will generally increase and if the stock price goes down the value of these derivatives will generally decrease.

The Company’s Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred and certain warrants contain anti-dilution provisions which results in these instruments no longer being deemed to be indexed to the Company’s own stock. As a result of the restatement, amounts previously classified in equity were reclassified to liabilities as of January 1, 2009. For each subsequent reporting quarter, the value of the Derivative Liabilities was revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 815 as of January 1, 2009 was a decrease in additional paid in capital of $5,836,000, a decrease in accumulated deficit of $1,709,000 and an increase in Derivative Liabilities of $4,127,000. The resulting impact of this accounting change as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is a decrease in discount on secured notes payable and additional financing obligation of $9,000, an increase in the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders of $5,589,000, a decrease in additional paid-in capital of $554,000, an increase in accumulated deficit of $4,874,000 and an increase in Derivative Liabilities of 5,419,000.

The revisions relate to non-operating and non-cash items as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009. ASC 815 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements for periods ending December 31, 2008 or earlier.

~~-44-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table summarizes the effect of the restated adjustments on amounts previously reported as of, and for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):~~

As Previously As
($ in thousands) Reported Adjustments Restated

Total assets $ 5,400 $ - $ 5,400

Secured note payable, net of discount 818 (437 ) (2) 933
106 (4)
36 (6)
410 (5)

Additional financing obligation, net of discount 877 (106 ) (4) 771
Other current liabilities 5,337 - 5337

Total current liabilities $ 7,032 $ 9 $ 7,041

Derivative liabilities - 4,127 (1) 9,547
989 (2)
4,430 (3)
Pension obligation 1,117 - 1,117

Total liabilities 8,149 9,556 17,705

Stockholders' equity

Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock 2 - 2
Series C convertible non-redeemable preferred stock - - -
Series D convertible non-redeemable preferred stock - - -

Common stock 180 - 180

Additional paid in capital 86,833 (5,836 ) (1) 80,441
(554 ) (2)
Treasury Stock (64 ) (64 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income 9 9

Accumulated deficit (89,709 ) (4,430 ) (3) (92,873 )
(410 ) (5)
(34 ) (6)
1,709 (1)
Total Shareholders' deficit (2,749 ) (9,556 ) (12,303 )

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) $ 5,400 $ - $ 5,400

~~-45-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The effect of the restatement adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009~~ ~~is set forth in the following table:~~

As Previously As
($ in thousands) Reported Adjustments Restated

Loss from operations $ (500 ) $ - $ (500 )

Interest expense, net 233 (53 ) 180
Change in fair value of financing obligation 397 53 450
Loss on debt modification 340 410 (5) 750
Other income, net (11 ) - (11 )
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities - 5,179 (3) 5,179

Net loss (1,459 ) (5,589 ) (7,048 )

Preferred dividends (100 ) - (100 )
Net loss available to common shareholders $ (1,559 ) $ (5,589 ) $ (7,148 )

Basic and diluted loss per common share
Continuing operations $ (0.08 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.39 )
Preferred dividends (0.01 ) - (0.01 )

Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.09 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.40 )

~~(1)~~ ~~to record the cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings to reclassify the fair value of the Derivatives as a liability~~

~~(2)~~ ~~to record the fair value of 2009 warrant issuances as a derivative liability~~

~~(3)~~ ~~to record the change in fair value of derivative liabilities~~

~~(4)~~ ~~to record change in discount on additional financing obligation~~

~~(5)~~ ~~to record the change in the loss on loan modification~~

~~(6)~~ ~~to record the change in interest expense resulting from changes to note discount and related amortization caused by revaluation of warrants issued with debt~~

~~(7)~~ ~~to record reclassification of accretion of minimum portion of additional financing obligation~~

~~-46-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Comparison of Results for the Periods Ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009~~

~~Product Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Net Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
827

$
390

$
437

112
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

61
%

58
%

Hardware and consumables

$
224

$
60

$
164

273
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

16
%

9
%

Services

$
309

$
225

$
84

37
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

23
%

33
%

Total net product revenues

$
1,360

$
6755

$
685

101
%

Software and royalty revenues increased 112% or $437,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase is due to higher sales of our Biometric Engine software solutions of approximately $462,000, higher royalties and license revenues of approximately $4,000 and higher project-oriented revenues of our law enforcement software solutions of approximately $24,000, offset by lower sales of our boxed identity management software sold through our distribution channel of approximately $53,000.

Revenues from the sale of hardware and consumables increased 273% or approximately $164,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase reflects higher revenues from project solutions containing hardware and consumable components.

Services revenues are comprised primarily of software integration services, system installation services and customer training. Such revenues increased approximately $84,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due primarily to higher revenues being generated from our identity management and law enforcement project solutions.

~~Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Maintenance revenues

$
668

$
638

$
30

5
%

The increase in maintenance revenues reflects higher maintenance revenues of approximately $9,000 generated from our law enforcement products combined with higher maintenance revenues of approximately $21,000 generated from our identity management product suite.

~~-47-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Cost of Product Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Cost of Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
182

$
45

$
137

304
%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue

22
%

12
%

Hardware and consumables

$
193

$
40

$
153

383
%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue

86
%

67
%

Services

$
153

$
199

$
(46)

(23)
%
Percentage of services product revenue

50
%

88
%

Total cost of product revenues

$
528

$
284

$
244

86
%
Percentage of total product revenues

39
%

42
%

The cost of software and royalty product revenue increased 304% or $137,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher third-party software content in solutions provided during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009.

The increase in the cost of hardware and consumables product revenue of $153,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 reflects the increase in hardware and consumable revenues of approximately $164,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009.

Costs of service revenues decreased $46,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 despite an increase of approximately $84,000 in service revenues. This inverse relationship is due to the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 containing software integration costs of our identity management products into project solutions in excess of revenues generated on certain contracts.

~~Cost of Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Cost of Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance cost of revenues
$ 247 $ 209 $ 38 18 %
Percentage of total maintenance revenues
37 % 33 %

Cost of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues increased to 37% during the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 33% for the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher identification labor costs incurred to support completed identity management project solutions.

~~-48-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Product Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Product Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
645

$
345

$
300

87
%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue

78
%

88
%

Hardware and consumables

$
31

$
20

$
11

55
%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue

14
%

33
%

Services

$
156

$
26

$
130

500
%
Percentage of services product revenue

50
%

12
%

Total product gross profit

$
832

$
391

$
441

113
%
Percentage of total product revenues

61
%

58
%

Software and royalty gross profit increased by 87% or approximately $300,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher software and royalty product revenues of approximately $437,000 in the 2010 period, offset by increases in software and royalty cost of revenues of approximately $137,000. Costs of software products can also vary as a percentage of product revenue from quarter to quarter depending upon product mix and third party software licenses included in software solutions.

Hardware and consumables gross profit increased by 55% or approximately $11,000 for the three months ended March 31, 20010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher hardware and consumables product revenues of approximately $164,000 in the 2010 period, offset by increases in hardware and consumables cost of revenues of approximately $153,000.

Services gross profit increased approximately $130,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase is due primarily to a increase of $84,000 in service revenues generated during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009 combined with the three month period ending March 31, 2009 containing direct labor costs in excess of revenues generated on certain contracts.

~~Maintenance Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Maintenance Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance gross profit

$
421

$
429

$
(8
)

(2)
%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues

63
%

67
%

Gross margins related to maintenance revenues decreased despite higher maintenance revenues of approximately $30,000 due to higher maintenance cost of revenues of approximately $38,000. The increase in maintenance revenues is due to higher maintenance revenues generated from our identity management product suite. The increase in maintenance cost of revenues is reflective of higher identification labor costs incurred to support completed identity management project solutions.

~~-49-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Operating Expenses.~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Operating Expenses 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

General and administrative

$
697

$
609

$
88

14
%
Percentage of total net revenue

34
%

46
%

Sales and marketing

$
392

$
429

$
(37
)
(9)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

19
%

33
%

Research and development

$
697

$
587

$
110

19
%
Percentage of total net revenue

34
%

45
%

Depreciation and amortization

$
14

$
33

$
(19
)
(58)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

1
%

3
%

~~General and Administrative Expenses.~~ General and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of salaries and other employee-related costs for executive, financial, and other infrastructure personnel. General legal, accounting and consulting services, insurance, occupancy and communication costs are also included with general and administrative expenses. The dollar increase of $88,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Increase in stock-based compensation expense of approximately $8,000 due to the issuance of restricted stock grants in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.~~

·	~~Increase in professional services of approximately $180,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy related expenses of approximately $11,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $85,000 due to reductions in headcount.~~

·	~~Increase in travel related expenses of approximately $7,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in expenses related to our closed sales office in Germany and other expenses of approximately $11,000.~~

~~Sales and Marketing.~~ Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of the salaries, commissions, other incentive compensation, employee benefits and travel expenses of our sales, marketing and business development functions. The dollar decrease of $37,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Decrease in compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $38,000.~~

·	~~Decrease of $40,000 in expenses incurred for sales contractors and consultants.~~

·	~~Increase in occupancy related expenses of approximately $1,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in travel related expenses of approximately $4,000.~~

·	~~Increase of $44,000 from costs related to our Mexico City sales office opened in June 2009.~~

~~-50-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Research and Development.~~ Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee benefits and outside contractors for new product development, product enhancements and custom integration work. Such expenses increased 19% or $110,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 2009. The increase is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Increase of $109,000 in compensation and related fringe benefits combined with increases in contract programming expenditures of approximately $27,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in travel related expenses of approximately $6,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy related expenses of approximately $20,000.~~

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~ During the three months ended March 31, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense decreased 58% or $19,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is due largely to limitations placed on acquiring new equipment in 2010.

~~Interest Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $242,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $102,000.

~~Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $64,000.~~

·	~~Accretion of note discount to interest expense of approximately $162,000.~~

·	~~Other interest expense of approximately $16,000.~~

~~Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $7,000.~~

·	~~Accretion of note discount to interest expense of approximately $59,000.~~

·	~~Amortization of deferred financing fees to interest expense of approximately $16,000.~~

·	~~Interest expense of approximately $20,000 related to liquidated damages accrued pursuant to a registration payment arrangement.~~

~~Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities~~. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized a non-cash expense of $477,000 compared to non-cash income of $748,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 due to implementation of ASC 815 effective January 1, 2009. Such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s Derivative Liabilities. The Derivative Liabilities were revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~Change in Fair Value of Financing Obligation~~. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized non-cash expense of $229,000 compared to non-cash expense of $152,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 related to the change in fair value of the Company’s financing obligation. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation of approximately $158,000 and the accretion of the fixed component of the financing obligation of approximately $71,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation of approximately $90,000 and the accretion of the fixed component of the financing obligation of approximately $62,000. The variable component of the financing obligation was revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~-51-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Other Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized other income of $17,000 and other expense of $0. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized other income of $11,000 and other expense of $0. Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 contains approximately $2,000 from the negotiated settlement of certain trade accounts payable at amounts less than their carrying value, $10,000 from the forfeiture by certain participants of certain 401(k) plan employer match contributions and $5,000 from collections on previously derecognized receivables. Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is comprised primarily of $6,000 in insurance reimbursement and $5,000 from collection on previously derecognized receivables.

~~Comparison of Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009~~

~~Product Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Net Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
319

$
785

$
(466)

(59)
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

62
%

79
%

Hardware and consumables

$
98

$
25

$
73

292
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

19
%

3
%

Services

$
94

$
189

$
(95)

(50)
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

18
%

19
%

Total net product revenues

$
511

$
999

$
(488)

(49)
%

Software and royalty revenues decreased 59% or $466,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease is due primarily to lower identity management software sold into project solutions of approximately $147,000, lower sales of our boxed identity management software sold through our distribution channel of approximately $122,000 and lower project-oriented revenues of our law enforcement software solutions of approximately $237,000. These decreases were partially offset by higher identification software royalties and license revenues of approximately $40,000.

Revenues from the sale of hardware and consumables increased 292% or $73,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase reflects higher revenues from consumables sold to our law enforcement customers.

Services revenues are comprised primarily of software integration services, system installation services and customer training. Such revenues decreased approximately $95,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due to lower revenues being generated from our identity management and law enforcement project solutions.

~~-52-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Maintenance revenues

$
640

$
646

$
(6)
)

(1)
%

The decrease in maintenance revenues reflects lower maintenance revenues of approximately $10,000 generated from our law enforcement products offset by higher maintenance revenues of approximately $4,000 generated from our identity management product suite.

~~Cost of Product Revenues.~~

Three Months
Ended
June 30,

Cost of Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
39

$
120

$
(81)

(68)
%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue

12
%

15
%

Hardware and consumables

$
48

$
26

$
22

85
%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue

49
%

104
%

Services

$
57

$
171

$
(114)

(67)
%
Percentage of services product revenue

61
%

90
%

Total cost of product revenues

$
144

$
317

$
(173)

(55)
%
Percentage of total product revenues

28
%

32
%

The cost of software and royalty product revenue decreased 68% or $81,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due to lower third-party software content in solutions provided during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease also reflects the reduction in our project-oriented revenues from our law enforcement and identity management product suites during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009.

The increase in the cost of hardware and consumables product revenue of $22,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 reflects the increase in hardware and consumable revenues of approximately $73,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009.

Costs of service revenues decreased $114,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease of 50% or $95,000 in service revenues generated during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009 combined with the three month period ended June 30, 2009 containing integration costs of our identity management products into project solutions in excess of revenues generated on certain contracts.

~~-53-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Cost of Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Cost of Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance cost of revenues

$
254

$
199

$
55

28
%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues

40
%

31
%

Costs of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues increased to 40% during the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 31% for the corresponding period in 2009. This increase is due primarily to higher identification labor costs incurred to perform maintenance requirements on completed large-scale identity management projects.

~~Product Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Product Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties
$ 280 $ 665 $ (385 ) (58 ) %
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue
88 % 85 %
Hardware and consumables
$ 50 $ (1 ) $ 51 5100 %
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue
51 % -4 %
Services
$ 37 $ 18 $ 19 106 %
Percentage of services product revenue
39 % 10 %
Total product gross profit
$ 367 $ 682 $ (315 ) (46 ) %
Percentage of total product revenues
72 % 68 %

Software and royalty gross profit decreased by 58% or approximately $385,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to lower software and royalty product revenues of approximately $466,000 in 2010. Costs of software products can also vary as a percentage of product revenue from quarter to quarter depending upon product mix and third party software licenses included in software solutions.

Hardware and consumables gross profit increased by approximately $51,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher hardware and consumables product revenues of approximately $73,000 in the 2010 period, offset by increases in hardware and consumables cost of revenues of approximately $22,000.

Services gross profit increased approximately $19,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to the three months ended June 30, 2009 containing direct labor costs in excess of revenues generated on certain contracts.

~~-54-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Maintenance Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Maintenance Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance gross profit

$
386

$
447

$
(61)

(14)
%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues

60
%

69
%

Gross margins related to maintenance revenues decreased due to lower maintenance revenues of approximately $6,000 combined with higher maintenance cost of revenues of approximately $55,000. This increase in costs is due primarily to higher labor costs incurred to perform maintenance requirements on completed large-scale identity management projects.

~~Operating Expenses.~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Operating expenses 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

General and administrative

$
680

$
595

$
85

14
%
Percentage of total net revenue

59
%

36
%

Sales and marketing

$
381

$
451

$
(70)

(16)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

33
%

27
%

Research and development

$
666

$
553

$
113

20
%
Percentage of total net revenue

58
%

34
%

Depreciation and amortization

$
12

$
30

$
(18)

(60)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

1
%

2
%

~~General and Administrative Expenses.~~ General and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of salaries and other employee-related costs for executive, financial, and other infrastructure personnel. General legal, accounting and consulting services, insurance, occupancy and communication costs are also included with general and administrative expenses. The dollar increase of $85,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Increase in professional services of approximately $174,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in finance related expenses of approximately $59,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy and insurance related expenses of approximately $7,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $31,000 due to reductions in headcount.~~

·	~~Decrease in expenses related to our closed sales office in Germany of approximately $3,000.~~

·	~~Increase in stock based compensation expense of approximately $6,000 due to the issuance of restricted stock grants in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.~~

·	~~Increase in travel related expenses of approximately $5,000.~~

~~-55-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Sales and Marketing.~~ Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of the salaries, commissions, other incentive compensation, employee benefits and travel expenses of our sales, marketing and business development functions. The decrease of $70,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Decrease in compensation, including stock based compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $42,000.~~

·	~~Decrease of $40,000 in expenses incurred for sales contractors and consultants.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy related expenses of approximately $4,000.~~

·	~~Increase in travel related expenses of approximately $4,000.~~

·	~~Increase of $12,000 from costs related to our Mexico City sales office opened in June 2009.~~

~~Research and Development~~. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee benefits and outside contractors for new product development, product enhancements and custom integration work. Such expenses increased 20% or $113,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 2009. The increase is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Increase of $107,000 in compensation and related fringe benefits combined with increases in contract programming expenditures of approximately $9,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy and other related expenses of approximately $3,000.~~

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~ During the three months ended June 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense decreased 60% or $18,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense reflects the limitations placed on acquiring new equipment in 2010.

~~Interest Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $334,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $180,000.

~~Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $58,000.~~

·	~~Accretion of note discount to interest expense of approximately $271,000.~~

·	~~Other interest expense of approximately $5,000.~~

~~Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $33,000.~~

·	~~Accretion of note discount to interest expense of approximately $74,000.~~

·	~~Amortization of deferred financing fees to interest expense of approximately $8,000.~~

·	~~Interest expense of approximately $65,000 primarily related to liquidated damages accrued pursuant to a registration payment arrangement.~~

~~-56-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities~~. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized non-cash income of $4,154,000 compared to non-cash expense of $5,179,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 due to implementation of ASC 815 effective January 1, 2009. Such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s Derivative Liabilities. The Derivative Liabilities were revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~Change in Fair Value of Financing Obligation~~. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized non-cash income of $744,000 compared to non-cash expense of $450,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 related to the change in fair value of the Company’s financing obligation. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, such income is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation of approximately $816,000 offset by the accretion of the fixed component of the financing obligation of approximately $72,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation of approximately $412,000 and the accretion of the fixed component of the financing obligation of approximately $38,000. The variable component of the financing obligation was revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~Other Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized other income of $284,000 and other expense of $0. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized other income of $11,000 and other expense of $0. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 contains approximately $280,000 from the reduction of previously accrued liquidated damages due to the expiration of the statue of limitations and $4,000 from collections on previously derecognized receivables. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is comprised primarily of $6,000 from the negotiated settlement of certain trade accounts payable at amounts less than their carrying value and $5,000 from collection on previously derecognized receivables.

~~Comparison of Results for the Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009~~

~~Product Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Net Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
370

$
216

$
154

71
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

48
%

90
%

Hardware and consumables

$
21

$
37

$
(16)

(43)
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

3
%

15
%

Services

$
378

$
(12
)

$
390

3,250
%
Percentage of total net product revenue

49
%

(5
)%

Total net product revenues

$
769

$
241

$
528

219
%

Software and royalty revenues increased 71% or $154,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase is due primarily to higher identity management software sold into project solutions of approximately $129,000, higher sales of our boxed identity management software sold through our distribution channel of approximately $17,000 and higher project-oriented revenues of our law enforcement software solutions of approximately $12,000. This was partially offset by lower royalties and license revenues of approximately $4,000.

Revenues from the sale of hardware and consumables decreased 43% or $16,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease reflects the lower levels of hardware and consumables generated from project solutions.

Services revenues are comprised primarily of software integration services, system installation services and customer training. Such revenues increased approximately $390,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher service revenues being generated from our identity management project solutions.

~~-57-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Maintenance revenues

$
653

$
659

$
(6)

(1)
%

The decrease in maintenance revenues reflects lower maintenance revenues of approximately $23,000 generated from our law enforcement products offset by higher maintenance revenues of approximately $17,000 generated from our identity management product suite.

~~Cost of Product Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Cost of Product Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
36

$
32

$
4

13
%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue

10
%

15
%

Hardware and consumables

$
26

$
42

$
(16)

(38)
%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue

124
%

114
%

Services

$
187

$
93

$
94

101
%
Percentage of services product revenue

49
%

-775
%

Total cost of product revenues

$
249

$
167

$
82

49
%
Percentage of total product revenues

32
%

69
%

The cost of software and royalty product revenue increased 13% or $4,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher third-party software content in solutions provided during the three month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009.

The decrease in cost of hardware and consumables product revenue of $16,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009 reflects the decrease in hardware and consumable revenues of approximately $16,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009.

Costs of service revenues increased $94,000 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The increase is due primarily to an increase of $390,000 in service revenues generated during the three month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the comparable period in 2009.

~~-58-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Cost of Maintenance Revenues.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Cost of Maintenance Revenues 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance cost of revenues

$
198

$
201

$
(3)

(1)
%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues

30
%

31
%

Costs of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues decreased to 30% during the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 31% for the corresponding period in 2009. This decrease is due primarily to reductions in costs incurred to perform maintenance requirements on completed law enforcement project solutions.

~~Product Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Product Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties

$
334

$
184

$
150
)

82
%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue

90
%

85
%

Hardware and consumables

$
(5)

$
(5)

$
0

0
%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue

-24
%

(14)
%

Services

$
191

$
(105)

$
296

282
%
Percentage of services product revenue

51
%

(875)
%

Total product gross profit

$
520

$
74

$
446
)

603
%
Percentage of total product revenues

68
%

31
%

Software and royalty gross profit increased by 82% or approximately $150,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher software and royalty product revenues of approximately $154,000 in the 2010 period, offset partially by higher software and royalty cost of revenues of approximately $4,000. Costs of software products can also vary as a percentage of product revenue from quarter to quarter depending upon product mix and third party software licenses included in software solutions.

Services gross profit increased approximately $296,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the corresponding period in 2009 due to higher service revenues being generated from our identity management project solutions.

~~Maintenance Gross Profit.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Maintenance Gross Profit 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance gross profit

$
455

$
458

$
(3
)

(1)
%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues

70
%

69
%

~~Gross profit related to maintenance revenues decreased approximately $3,000 due to lower maintenance revenues.~~

~~-59-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Operating Expenses.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Operating Expenses 2010 2009 $ Change % Change
(dollars in thousands)

General and administrative

$
512

$
555

$
(43
)

(8)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

36
%

62
%

Sales and marketing

$
385

$
376

$
9

2
%
Percentage of total net revenue

27
%

42
%

Research and development

$
576

$
582

$
(6
)

(1)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

41
%

65
%

Depreciation and amortization

$
13

$
19

$
(6
)

(32)
%
Percentage of total net revenue

1
%

2
%

~~General and Administrative Expenses.~~ General and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of salaries and other employee-related costs for executive, financial, and other infrastructure personnel. General legal, accounting and consulting services, insurance, occupancy and communication costs are also included with general and administrative expenses. The decrease of $43,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Decrease in expenses related to our closed sales office in Germany of approximately $9,000.~~

·	~~Increase in professional services of approximately $6,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in insurance related expenses of approximately $3,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy related expenses of approximately $18,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $14,000 due to reductions in headcount.~~

·	~~Decrease in travel related expenses of approximately $5,000.~~

~~Sales and Marketing.~~ Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of the salaries, commissions, other incentive compensation, employee benefits and travel expenses of our sales, marketing and business development functions. The increase of $9,000 is comprised of the following major components:

·	~~Increase in compensation and related fringe benefits of approximately $44,000 due to increases in headcount.~~

·	~~Decrease of $39,000 in expenses incurred for sales contractors and consultants.~~

·	~~Decrease in occupancy related expenses of approximately $1,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in travel related expenses of approximately $4,000.~~

·	~~Decrease in stock-based compensation expense of approximately $13,000.~~

·	~~Increase of $22,000 from costs related to our Mexico City sales office opened in June 2009.~~

~~-60-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Research and Development.~~ Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee benefits and outside contractors for new product development, product enhancements and custom integration work. Such expenses decreased 1% or $6,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 2009.

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~ During the three months ended September 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense decreased 32% or $6,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense reflects the limitations placed on acquiring new equipment in 2010.

~~Interest Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $60,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized interest income of $0 and interest expense of $212,000.

~~Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $54,000.~~

·	~~Other interest expense of approximately $6,000.~~

~~Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is comprised of the following components:~~

·	~~Coupon interest on secured notes payable and convertible notes payable of approximately $32,000.~~

·	~~Accretion of note discount to interest expense of approximately $82,000.~~

·	~~Fair value of warrants issued to related party convertible note holders in consideration for wavier of default of approximately $52,000.~~

·	~~Amortization of deferred financing fees to interest expense of approximately $1,000.~~

·	~~Interest expense of approximately $45,000 primarily related to liquidated damages accrued pursuant to a registration payment arrangement.~~

~~Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities~~. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized non-cash income of $506,000 compared to non-cash expense of $756,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 due to implementation of ASC 815 effective January 1, 2009. Such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s Derivative Liabilities. The Derivative Liabilities were revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~Change in Fair Value of Financing Obligation~~. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized non-cash income of $38,000 compared to non-cash expense of $438,000 for the corresponding period of 2009 related to the change in fair value of the Company’s financing obligation. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, such income is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, such expense is related to the change in fair value of the Company’s variable component of the financing obligation of approximately $355,000 and the accretion of the fixed component of the financing obligation of approximately $83,000. The variable component of the financing obligation was revalued using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies.

~~Other Expense (Income), Net.~~ For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized other income of $12,000 and other expense of $0. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized other income of $132,000 and other expense of $8,000. Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 contains approximately $12,000 from collections on previously derecognized receivables. Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is comprised primarily of $128,000 from the negotiated settlement of certain trade accounts payable at amounts less than their carrying value and $4,000 from collection on previously derecognized receivables. Other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is comprised of approximately $8,000 of foreign currency transaction losses.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board, or~~ FASB, or other standard setting bodies, which are adopted by usthe Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company’s management believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

~~-61-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

FASB ASU 2010-06. In January 2010, the FASB issued ~~FASB Accounting Standards Update, or~~ ASU 2010-06 which amends the disclosure requirements relating to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. New disclosures are required about transfers into and out of the ~~levels~~Levels 1 and 2 fair value hierarchy and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. This ASU also requires an entity to present information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for significant unobservable inputs on a gross basis rather than as a net number. This ASU was effective for usthe Company with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures on the roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which ~~will become~~became effective for ~~us with~~ the ~~reporting period~~Company beginning ~~October~~January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~position and results of operations,~~statements as it only requires additional disclosures.

-34-

Table of Contents

FASB ASU 2010-17. In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force”, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. ASU 2010-17 is effective for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2010-29. In December 2010, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~ ASU 2010-29, which requires an entity to disclose revenue and earnings of a combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual period only. It also requires pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of the material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The ~~Company does not expect the~~ adoption of ASU 2010-29 ~~to have a material~~did not impact on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements as there were no business combinations to report.

FASB ASU 2011-05. In June 2011 the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2011-05, ~~Comprehensive~~“Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive ~~Income, (“ASU 2011-05”)~~Income”. This new accounting standard: (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. This new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income, nor does it affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. ASU 2011-05 is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As this new standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not impact the Company’s consolidated financial ~~position or results of operations.~~statements.

FASB ASU 2011-08. In September 2011 the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2011-08, ~~Goodwill~~“Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for ~~Impairment,~~ ~~(“ASU 2011-08”)~~Impairment”. This new accounting standard simplifies goodwill impairment tests and states that a qualitative assessment may be performed to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2011-11. The FASB has issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”. The amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Coinciding with the release of ASU 2011-11, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to International Financial Reporting Standards 7). This amendment requires disclosures about the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities common to those in ASU 2011-11. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2011-12. The FASB has issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05”. The amendments to the Codification in ASU 2011-12 are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, so that entities will not be required to comply with the presentation requirements in ASU 2011-05 that ASU 2011-12 is deferring. In order to defer only those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in ASU 2011-12 supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by ASU 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ~~ASU 2011-08~~this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~FASB ASU 2011-09~~. The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU 2011-09 is intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitments and risks involved with participating in multiemployer pension plans. The amendments in this ASU will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily to the historical contributions made to the plans. ASU 2011-09 applies to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For public entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09 should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-09 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~-62-~~-35-

Table of Contents

Impact of Inflation

The primary inflationary factor affecting our operations is labor costs and we do not believe that inflation has materially affected earnings during the past four years. Substantial increases in costs and expenses, particularly labor and operating expenses, could have a significant impact on our operating results to the extent that such increases cannot be passed along to customers and end users.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Each of our contracts require payment in U.S. dollars. We therefore do not engage in hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to changes in currency exchange rates, although in the event any future contracts are denominated in a foreign currency, we may do so in the future. As a result, our financial results are not affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are included in Item 15 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not ~~Applicable~~Applicable.

ITEM 9A.		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, ~~2010 and 2009.~~2011. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports submitted under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and ~~forms, due to the weaknesses described below.~~forms. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

~~-63-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

(b)	Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for smaller reporting companies under Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

-36-

Table of Contents

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and 2009. Due principally to the Company’s liquidity challenges in 2009, we were compelled to reduce personnel, including accounting staff, and therefore suspend SEC filings and the associated costs until such timeChief Financial Officer concluded that, as ~~we had sufficient resources to cover ongoing operations and the expenses~~ of maintaining compliance with SEC filing requirements. In addition, on August 16, 2010, management determined that our financial statements for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2009, respectively, which were included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, should no longer be relied upon due to an error in such financial statements with respect to the accounting for certain derivative features of our Series C and D Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Shares") and certain warrants (the "Warrants") which were previously recorded as equity instruments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in effect through December 31, ~~2008. The controls~~2011, our internal control over ~~our non-routine transactions and training of our accounting staff on new pronouncements did not function properly to prevent a material error in our quarterly~~ financial statements. These factors constitute material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures, and therefore our control environment, and prevented the Company from timely and accurately filing its required reports with the SEC.reporting was effective.

~~As discussed above, as a result of~~The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that there have been no changes, in the ~~liquidity challenges facing the Company, we were compelled to reduce personnel, including accounting staff. This factor resulted in a change in our~~Company’s internal ~~controls~~control over ~~our~~ financial reporting ~~and resulted~~during the period covered by this report identified in ~~a material weakness in our control environment.~~

~~The Company has since remedied~~connection with the ~~weakness, as management has retained and trained, and will continue to retain, additional personnel with technical knowledge, experience, and training~~evaluation described in the ~~application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our~~above paragraph that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Company’s internal control over financial ~~reporting and U.S. GAAP requirements.~~reporting.

~~Where necessary, we will supplement personnel with qualified external advisors.~~

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

~~-64-~~-37-

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors and executive officers consist of the persons named in the table below. Each director shall be elected for the term of one year, and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until earlier resignation or removal. The bylaws provide that the number of directors shall not be less than four ~~nor~~no more than seven. The directors and executive officers are as follows:

Name	Age	Principal Occupation/Position Held With the Company
Mr. S. James Miller, Jr.	58	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mr. Wayne Wetherell	59	Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Mr. John Callan	65	Director
Mr. David Carey	67	Director
Mr. Guy Steve Hamm	64	Director
Mr. David Loesch	67	Director
Mr. John Cronin	57	Director

S. James Miller, Jr. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1990 and Chairman of the Board since 1996. He also served as our President from 1990 until 2003. From 1980 to 1990, Mr. Miller was an executive with Oak Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of components for the telecommunications industry. While at Oak Industries, Mr. Miller served as a director and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chairman/President of Oak Industries’ Pacific Rim subsidiaries. He has a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law and a B.A. from the University of California, San Diego.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Miller possesses substantial managerial expertise leading the Company through its various stages of development and growth, beginning in 1990 when Mr. Miller joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer, and that such expertise is extremely valuable to the Board of Directors and the Company as it executes its business plan. In addition, the Board of Directors values the input provided by Mr. Miller given his legal experience.

Wayne Wetherell has served as our Senior Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer since May 2001 and additionally as our Secretary and Treasurer since October 2005. From 1996 to May 2001, he served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Wetherell was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bilstein Corporation of America, a manufacturer and distributor of automotive parts. Mr. Wetherell holds a B.S. degree in Management and an M.S. degree in Finance from San Diego State University.

John Callan was appointed to the Board in September 2000. Since July 2008, Mr. Callan returned to Ursa Major Associates, the consulting firm he co-founded in 2001. He now serves as Managing Director. From February 2007 to July 2008, Mr. Callan served as Vice President, Strategy and Business Development at DHL Global Mail, Americas. From March 2006 to February 2007, Mr. Callan served at DHL Global Mail as Vice President - Domestic Product Management. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Callan served as Principal of Ursa Major Associates, LLC, the logistics strategy-consulting firm he co-founded. From 1997 to 2002, he was an independent business strategy consultant in the imaging and logistics fields. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Callan served as Chief Operating Officer for Milestone Systems, a shipping systems software company. From 1987 to 1995, he served as Director of Entertainment Imaging at Polaroid Corporation. Mr. Callan is a graduate of the University of North Carolina.

~~-65-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Callan’s extensive business strategy consulting experience in the imaging and logistics fields, together with his extensive knowledge of the Company’s operations gained since joining the Board in 2000, provides the Company and the Board of Directors with valuable input with respect to issues facing the Company as it executes its business plan.

-38-

Table of Contents

David Carey was appointed to the Board in February 2006. Mr. Carey is a former Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Since July 2009 Mr. Carey has served as an Outside Director on the Special Security Agreement (SSA) Board of DRS Technologies, a Finmeccanica S.p.a company. Mr. Carey also serves on a number of Advisory Boards, including the Advisory Board of Raytheon TCS (Trusted Computer Solutions). Mr. Carey also consults with companies both independently and as an affiliate of both the Command Consulting Group and D4 Consulting. From April 2005 to August of 2008, Mr. Carey served as Executive Director for Blackbird Technologies, which provides state-of-the-art IT security expertise, where he assists the company with business development and strategic planning. Prior to joining Blackbird Technologies, Mr. Carey was Vice President, Information Assurance for Oracle Corporation from September 2001 to April 2005. In addition, Mr. Carey worked for the CIA for 32 years until 2001. During his career at the CIA, Mr. Carey held several senior positions including that of Executive Director, often referred to as the Chief Operating Officer, or No. 3 person in the agency, from 1997 to 2001. Before assuming that position, Mr. Carey was Director of the DCI Crime and Narcotics Center, the Director of the Office of Near Eastern and South Asian Analysis, and Deputy Director of the Office of Global Issues. Mr. Carey is a graduate of Cornell University and the University of Delaware.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Carey’s experience as a former Executive Director of the CIA, his experience dealing with IT security matters, and the extensive contacts gained over his career working within the intelligence and security community, provide the Board with specialized expertise that assists the Company in the specific industries in which it operates.

Guy Steve Hamm was appointed to the Board in October 2004. Mr. Hamm served Aspen Holding, a privately held insurance provider, as CFO from December 2005 to February 2007. In 2003, Mr. Hamm retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was a national partner-in-charge of middle market. Mr. Hamm was instrumental in growing the Audit Business Advisory Services (ABAS) Middle Market practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was responsible for $300 million in revenue and more than 100 partners. Mr. Hamm is an adjunct professor in accounting at Chapman University. Mr. Hamm is a graduate of San Diego State University.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Hamm’s experience in public accounting, together with his management experience as a Chief Financial Officer, provide the Audit Committee of the Board with the expertise needed to oversee the Company’s finance and accounting professionals, and the Company’s independent public accountants.

David Loesch was appointed to the Board in September 2001 after 29 years of service as a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”). At the time of his retirement from the FBI, Mr. Loesch was the Assistant Director in Charge of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the FBI. Mr. Loesch was awarded the Presidential Rank Award for Meritorious Executive in 1998 and has served on the board of directors of the Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association since 1996. He is also a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI, Inc. Mr. Loesch served in the United States Army as an Officer with the 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. He holds a Bachelor’s degree from Canisius College and a Master’s degree in Criminal Justice from George Washington University. Mr. Loesch is currently a private consultant on public safety and criminal justice solutions.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Loesch’s extensive service as a Special Agent with the FBI, together with his knowledge of security issues relevant to the Company’s products and markets, provides the Company and the Board of Directors with relevant input regarding the industries in which the Company competes, and the markets served by the Company.

John Cronin was appointed to the Board in February 2012. Mr. Cronin is currently a Managing Director and Chairman of ipCG, the largest intellectual property strategy consulting team in the world, serving over 700 companies since 1998. As the primary architect for ipCG's Systemtatic ipCG Methodology. Mr. Cronin has also helped over many companies IP strategy and the resultant execution as well as assists clients for monetization , including out-licensing agreements, asset sales, and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to his work at ipCG, Mr. Cronin spent 17 years serving as the top inventor at IBM, with over 100 patents and 150 patent publications. Additionally, Mr. Cronin serves as a member of the Board of Directors at Vermont Electric Power Company (VELCO), Armor Designs, Inc., Document Security Systems, and Primal Fusion, Inc, and GraphOn and as a member of the advisory board for innoPad, Inc.

~~-66-~~-39-

Table of Contents

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Cronin’s experience developing and extracting the value from intellectual property, and his experience serving on, and advising, boards of directors, will contribute to deliberations of our Board of Directors, and assist the Company as it capitalizes on the opportunities presented by its portfolio of intellectual property assets.

~~SIGINIFICANT EMPLOYEES~~Significant Employees

The Company has also identified the following persons as significant employees of the Company:

Chuck AuBuchon.Mr. AuBuchon has served as our Vice President, Business Development since January 2007. From 2004 to 2007 he served as Vice President, Sales. From 2003 to 2004, he served as Director of North American Sales. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. AuBuchon was Vice President Sales & Marketing at Card Technology Corporation, a manufacturer of Card Personalization Systems, where he was responsible for distribution within the Americas, Asia Pacific and EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) regions. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. AuBuchon held various sales management positions, including Vice President Sales and Marketing, for Gemplus and Datacard. Mr. AuBuchon is a graduate of Pennsylvania State University.

David Harding. Mr. Harding has served as our Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since January 2006. Before joining us, Mr. Harding was the Chief Technology Officer at IC Solutions, Inc., where he was responsible for all technology departments including the development and management of software development, IT and quality assurance as well as their respective hardware, software and human resource budgets from 2001 to 2003. He was the Chief Technology Officer at Thirsty.com from 1999 to 2000, the Chief Technology Officer at Fulcrum Point Technologies, Inc., from 1996 to 1999, and consultant to Access360, which is now part of IBM/Tivoli, from 1995 to 1996.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with in a timely ~~manner.~~manner with the exception of Neal Goldman, who beneficially owns in excess of 10% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, who failed to timely file a Form 4 reporting his ownership of common stock acquired in connection with the Qualified Financing.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy that applies to our directors and employees (including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions). The Company intends to promptly disclose (i) the nature of any amendment to this code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and (ii) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of this code of ethics that is granted to one of these specified individuals, the name of such person who is granted the waiver and the date of the waiver on our website in the future. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained from our website at http://www.iwsinc.com.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below.

-40-

Table of Contents

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by approving the services performed by our independent accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent accountants and takes those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy it that the accountants are independent of management. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Hamm (Chairman), Carey and Loesch, each of whom is a non-management member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Hamm is also our Audit Committee financial expert as currently defined under Securities and Exchange Commission rules. We believe that the composition of our Audit Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our Audit Committee complies with the applicable requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

~~-67-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Compensation Committee~~

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee determines our general compensation policies and the compensation provided to our directors and officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews and determines bonuses for our officers and other employees. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and determines equity-based compensation for our directors, officers, employees and consultants and administers our stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Callan (Chairman), Cronin and Carey, each of whom is a non-management member of our Board of Directors. We believe that the composition of our Compensation Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our Compensation Committee complies with the applicable requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding candidates for directorships and the size and composition of the Board. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance guidelines and reporting and making recommendations to the Board concerning corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of ~~Mr. Callan (Chairman). The Board~~all the non employee members of ~~Directors intends to appoint an additional outside Board member to~~ the ~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.~~Board. We believe that the composition of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee complies with the applicable requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

As permitted by Delaware law, the Company will indemnify its directors and officers against expenses and liabilities they incur to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account of their being or having been Company directors or officers unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct.

~~-68-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information about the compensation paid or accrued during the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 to our Chief Executive Officer and the Company's two most highly compensated executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers at December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, and whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000 during such year (collectively the “Named Executive Officers”).

Name and Principal Position Year Salary Stock Awards
Option Awards
(1)(2)
All Other Compensation Total

S. James Miller, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
2010 $ 326,630 $ - (3) $ 68,539 (6) $ 4,560 $ 399,729
2009 338,570 - 51,358 (6) 5,744 395,672
-
Wayne G. Wetherell
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, and Treasurer
2010 195,240 - (4) 47,644 (6) 2,967 245,851
2009 202,563 - 33,327 (6) 5,012 240,902

David Harding
Vice President and
Chief Technical Officer
2010 188,061 - (5) 35,822 (6) - 223,883
2009 185,029 - 35,249 (6) - 220,278

-41-

Table of Contents

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Stock Awards				Option Awards (1)(2)				All Other Compensation		Total

S. James Miller, Jr. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	2011	$	331,428	$	-			$	100,565	(6	)	$	16,745	$	448,738
	2010		326,630		-	(3	)		68,539	(6	)		-		395,169
					-
Wayne G. Wetherell Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer	2011		198,291		-				24,836	(6	)		-		223,127
	2010		195,240		-	(4	)		47,644	(6	)		-		242,884

David Harding Vice President and Chief Technical Officer	2011		191,000		-				20,719	(6	)		-		211,719
David Harding Vice President and Chief Technical Officer	2010		188,061		-	(5	)		35,822	(6	)		-	$	223,883

(1)		All option awards were granted under the 1999 Stock Award Plan (the “1999 Plan”).

(2)		The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 and thus may include amounts from awards granted prior to ~~2010.~~2011. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest rates. We are required to make various assumptions in the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and have determined that the best measure of expected volatility is based on the historical weekly volatility of our common stock. Historical volatility factors utilized in our Black-Scholes computations range from ~~64%~~135% to ~~119%~~144%. We have elected to estimate the expected life of an award based upon the SEC approved “simplified method” noted under the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The expected term used by ~~us as computed by this method ranges from 5.5~~the Company during the years ~~to 6.1~~ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was 5.9 years. The difference between the actual historical expected life and the simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is the risk free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in ~~our~~the Company’s Black-Scholes calculations ~~range from 4.1 % to 4.6 %.~~for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was 2.6%. Dividend yield is zero, as we do not expect to declare any dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. In addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model, the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation is a critical assumption. We have estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of 9.7 % for corporate officers, 4.1 % for members of the Board of Directors and ~~24.3~~6.0 % for all other employees. We review the expected forfeiture rate annually to determine if that percent is still reasonable based on historical experience.

~~-69-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

(3)		Represents the quarterly vesting of 316,620 restricted shares granted on January 11, 2010. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a proposal that certain members of management and board members holding stock options be offered restricted stock awards in exchange for the cancellation of the stock options they held with strike prices of $1.45 or more. The restricted stock awards were offered on a 3 for 5 basis (for each 5 stock options surrendered, 3 shares of restricted stock are granted). The shares of restricted stock vest over three years on a quarterly basis with the participant to receive 1/12 of the shares on each three-month anniversary of the date of grant. As the fair value of the stock options exchanged exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued, no incremental compensation expense is incurred for the restricted shares.

-42-

Table of Contents

(4)		Represents the quarterly vesting of 163,560 restricted shares granted on January 11, 2010. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a proposal that certain members of management and board members holding stock options be offered restricted stock awards in exchange for the cancellation of the stock options they hold with strike prices of $1.45 or more. The restricted stock awards were offered on a 3 for 5 basis (for each 5 stock options surrendered, 3 shares of restricted stock are granted). The shares of restricted stock vest over three years on a quarterly basis with the participant to receive 1/12 of the shares on each three-month anniversary of the date of grant. As the fair value of the stock options exchanged exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued, no incremental compensation expense is incurred for the restricted shares.

(5)		Represents the quarterly vesting of 105,000 restricted shares granted on January 11, 2010. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a proposal that certain members of management and board members holding stock options be offered restricted stock awards in exchange for the cancellation of the stock options they hold with strike prices of $1.45 or more. The restricted stock awards were offered on a 3 for 5 basis (for each 5 stock options surrendered, 3 shares of restricted stock are granted). The shares of restricted stock vest over three years on a quarterly basis with the participant to receive 1/12 of the shares on each three-month anniversary of the date of grant. As the fair value of the stock options exchanged exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued, no incremental compensation expense is incurred for the restricted shares.

(6)

The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, in accordance with the provisions of ~~SFAS 123R~~ASC 718 and thus may include amounts from awards granted prior to ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009.~~2010. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in ~~Notes to~~Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~-70-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive awards held by each of the Named Executive Officers outstanding as of December 31, ~~2010:~~2011:

	Option Awards						Stock Awards				Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options: Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options: Unexercisable (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options: Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options: Unexercisable (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested
S. James Miller, Jr.	58,375	(1)		41,628	$	0.20	1/27/2019	237,465	$	232,716	91,675	(1)	8,235	$	0.20	1/27/2019	131,925	$	105,540
	—	(2)		183,000	$	0.73	1/29/2020				106,750	(2)	76,250	$	0.73	1/29/2020
											-	(3)	225,000	$	1.11	3/10/2021
Wayne G. Wetherell	35,000	(1)		25,000	$	0.20	1/27/2019	122,670	$	120,217
	—	(2)		60,000	$	0.73	1/29/2020				55,000	(1)	5,000	$	0.20	1/27/2019	68,150	$	54,520
											35,000	(2)	25,000	$	0.73	1/29/2020
David Harding	29,170	(1)		20,830	$	0.20	1/27/2019	78,750	$	77,175
	—	(2)		80,000	$	0.73	1/29/2020				45,834	(1)	4,166	$	0.20	1/27/2019	43,750	$	35,000

(1)		These options vest over three years with one third vesting ~~1/27/~~on January 27, 2010 and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments thereafter.
(2)		These options vest over three years with one third vesting ~~1/29/~~on January 29, 2011 and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments thereafter.
(3)		These options vest over three years with one third vesting on March 10, 2012 and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments thereafter.

-43-

Table of Contents

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

S. James Miller, Jr. On October 1, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Miller pursuant to which Mr. Miller serves as President and Chief Executive Officer. This agreement was for a three-year term ending September 30, 2008. On September 27, 2008 this agreement was amended to change the expiration from September 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. On April 6, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2009. On December 10, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2011. On March 10, 2011 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2012. On January 31, 2012 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2013. This agreement provides for annual base compensation in the amount of $291,048, which amount will be increased based on cost-of-living increases. Under this agreement, we will reimburse Mr. Miller for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with our business. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Miller will be entitled to the following severance benefits if we terminate his employment without cause or in the event of an involuntary termination: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to twenty-four ~~months’~~months base salary; (ii) continuation of Mr. Miller’s fringe benefits and medical insurance for a period of three years; and (iii) immediate vesting of 50% of Mr. Miller’s outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. In the event that Mr. Miller’s employment is terminated within six months prior to or thirteen months following a change of control (defined below), Mr. Miller is entitled to the severance benefits described above, except that 100% of Mr. Miller’s outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards will immediately vest.

~~-71-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Wayne Wetherell. On October 1, 2005, we entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Wetherell pursuant to which Mr. Wetherell will serve as our Chief Financial Officer. This agreement is for a three-year term ending September 30, 2008. On September 27, 2008 this agreement was amended to change the expiration from September 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. On April 6, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2009. On December 10, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2010. On March 10, 2011 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2011. On January 31, 2012 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to June 30, 2012. This agreement provides for annual base compensation in the amount of $174,100, which amount will be increased based on cost-of-living increases and may also be increased based on performance reviews. Under this agreement, we will reimburse Mr. Wetherell for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with our business. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Wetherell will be entitled to the following severance benefits if we terminate his employment without cause or in the event of an involuntary termination: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve ~~months;~~months of base salary; (ii) continuation of Mr. Wetherell’s fringe benefits and medical insurance for a period of three years; (iii) immediate vesting of 50% of Mr. Wetherell’s outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. In the event that Mr. Wetherell’s employment is terminated within six months prior to or thirteen months following a change of control (defined below), Mr. Wetherell is entitled to the severance benefits described above, except that 100% of Mr. Wetherell’s outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards will immediately vest.

Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement with David Harding. On May 21, 2007, we entered into a Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement with Mr. David Harding, our Vice President and Chief Technical Officer. This agreement has a two-year term, commencing on May 21, 2007. On September 27, 2008 this agreement was amended to change the expiration from May 21, 2009 to June 30, 2009. On April 6, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2009. On December 10, 2009 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2010. On March 10, 2011 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to December 31, 2011. On January 31, 2012 this agreement was amended to change the expiration to June 30, 2012. Subject to the conditions and other limitations set forth therein, Mr. Harding will be entitled to the following severance benefits if we terminate his employment without cause prior to the closing of any change of control transaction: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to six months of base salary; and (ii) continuation of Mr. Harding’s health insurance benefits until the earlier of six (6) months following the date of termination, the date on which he is no longer entitled to continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA or the date that he obtains comparable health insurance coverage. In the event that Mr. Harding’s employment is terminated within the twelve months following a change of control, he is entitled to the severance benefits described above, plus his stock options will immediately vest and become exercisable. Mr. Harding’s eligibility to receive severance payments or other benefits upon his termination is conditioned upon him executing a general release of liability.

-44-

Table of Contents

For purposes of each of the above-referenced agreements, termination for “cause” generally means the executive’s commission of an act of fraud or similar conduct which is intended to result in substantial personal enrichment of the executive, conviction or plea of nolo contendere to a felony, gross negligence or breach of fiduciary duty that results in material injury to us, material breach of the executive’s proprietary information agreement that is materially injurious to us, willful and material failure to perform his duties as an officer or employee of ours or material breach of his employment agreement and the failure to cure such breach in a specified period of time or a violation of a material policy of ours that is materially injurious to us. A “change in control” as used in these agreements generally means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the acquisition by any person or group of 50% or more of our outstanding voting stock, (ii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or similar transaction other than a transaction: (1) in which substantially all of the holders of our voting stock hold or receive directly or indirectly 50% or more of the voting stock of the resulting entity or a parent company thereof, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to the transaction; or (2) in which the holders of our capital stock immediately before such transaction will, immediately after such transaction, hold as a group on a fully diluted basis the ability to elect at least a majority of the directors of the surviving corporation (or a parent company); (iii) there is consummated a sale, lease, exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of us and our Subsidiaries, other than a sale, lease, license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of us and our Subsidiaries to an entity, 50% or more of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by our stockholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale, lease, license, or other disposition; or (iv) individuals who, on the date the applicable agreement was adopted by the Board, are Directors (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Directors; provided, however, that if the appointment or election (or nomination for election) of any new Director was approved or recommended by a majority vote of the members of the Incumbent Board then still in office, such new member shall, for purposes of the applicable agreement, be considered as a member of the Incumbent Board.

~~-72-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each of our non-employee directors receives a monthly retainer of $3,000 for serving on the Board of Directors. Board members who also serve on the Audit Committee receive additional monthly compensation of $458 for the Chairman and $208 for the remaining members of the Audit Committee. Board members who also serve on the Compensation Committee receive additional monthly compensation of $417 for the Chairman and $208 for the remaining members of the Compensation Committee. The members of the Board of Directors are also eligible for reimbursement for their expenses incurred in attending Board meetings in accordance with our policies. For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the Board held the payment of fees for the period for approximately ten months in light of the Company’s limited cash resources. For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 the total amounts paid to non-employee directors as compensation (excluding reimbursable expenses) was ~~$40,250.~~$39,667. During that same period a total of ~~$160,250~~approximately $151,000 was accrued as board fees but not paid.

Each of our non-employee directors is also eligible to receive stock option grants under the 1999 Plan. Options granted under the 1999 Plan are intended by us not to qualify as incentive stock options under the Code.

The term of options granted under the 1999 Plan is ten years. In the event of a merger of us with or into another corporation or a consolidation, acquisition of assets or other change-in-control transaction involving us, an equivalent option will be substituted by the successor corporation, provided, however, that we may cancel outstanding options upon consummation of the transaction by giving at least thirty (30) days notice.

~~Director Compensation~~The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each person who served as a director during the year ended December 31, 2011, other than a director who also served as an executive officer.

-45-

Table of Contents


	Year	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)(7)		All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)	Year	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)(8)		All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
John Callan	2010		41,000		(2)		4,799			2011		41,000	-	(2)		1,871		42,871
	2009		41,000				4,996			2010		41,000	-	(2)		4,799	-	45,799

John Holleran (1)	2010		41,000		(3)		4,799			2011		34,167	-	(3)		1,871		36,038
	2009		41,000				4,996			2010		41,000	-	(3)		4,799	-	45,799

Guy Steve Hamm	2010		41,500		(4)		4,799			2011		41,500	-	(4)		2,411		43,911
	2009		41,500				4,996			2010		41,500	-	(4)		4,799	-	46,299

David Carey	2010		38,500		(5)		4,799			2011		38,500	-	(5)		1,871		40,371
	2009		38,500				4,996			2010		38,500	-	(5)		4,799	-	43,299

David Loesch	2010		38,500		(6)		4,799			2011		38,500	-	(6)		1,871		40,371
	2009		38,500				4,996			2010		38,500	-	(6)		4,799	-	43,299

John Cronin (7)										2011		-	-			-	-	-
										2010		-	-			-	-	-

As of December 31, 2010, Neal Goldman, and certain affiliated entities (together, "Goldman"), held certain promissory notes issued during the quarter ended December 31, 2010, in the principal amount of $5.5 million (the “Goldman Notes”). The Goldman Notes accrued interest at the rate of 6.0%, became due and payable on various dates in the quarter ending December 31, 2012, and were convertible into a total of 11,732,986 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, Goldman was issued warrants to purchase 8.25 million shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with the issuance of the Goldman Notes, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The total principal and accrued interest due and payable Goldman under the terms of the Goldman Notes at December 31, 2010 was $5,543,438, at which time Goldman may be deemed an affiliate of the Company due to his beneficial ownership of in excess of ten percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Each of the Goldman Notes was paid, and/or converted into shares of the Company’s common stock on December 20, 2011 in connection with the Qualified Financing.

-50-

~~REVIEW, APPROVAL OR RATIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS~~Table of Contents

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

As provided in the charter of our Audit Committee, it is our policy that we will not enter into any transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K unless the Audit Committee or another independent body of our Board of Directors first reviews and approves the transactions.

In addition, pursuant to our Code of Ethical Conduct and Business Practices, all employees, officers and directors of ours and our subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in any relationship or financial interest that is an actual or potential conflict of interest with us without approval. Employees, officers and directors are required to provide written disclosure to the Chief Executive Officer as soon as they have any knowledge of a transaction or proposed transaction with an outside individual, business or other organization that would create a conflict of interest or the appearance of one.

~~DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors has determined that all of its members, other than Mr. Miller, who serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, are “independent” within the meaning of the NASDAQ and Securities and Exchange Commission rules regarding independence.

We maintain separately designated Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. In applying the independence standards applicable to such Committee members, each of the members is considered independent.

~~-78-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table represents aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~ by ~~Stonefield Josephson, Inc. ("Stonefield"), the Company’s prior independent registered public accounting firm, and~~ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. On October 1, 2010, Stonefield combined its practice with Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) and began practicing in California and Hong Kong as "Marcum Stonefield", a division of Marcum. Accordingly, effective October 1, 2010, Stonefield effectively resigned as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm and Marcum became the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee dismissed Marcum on June 30, 2011.

Fiscal Year Ended
2010 2009
Audit Fees

Marcum Stonefield $ - $ 176,025

Mayer Hoffman $ 113,000 $ 113,000

Total Fees $ 113,000 $ 289,025

	Fiscal Year Ended
	2011		2010

Audit fees	$	159,000	$	113,000

Total Fees	$	159,000	$	113,000

The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved all fees described above.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditor, currently Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. The policy generally pre-approves specified services in the defined categories of audit services, audit-related services, and tax services up to specified amounts. Pre-approval may also be given as part of the Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent auditor or on an individual explicit case-by-case basis before the independent auditor is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or more of the Audit Committee’s members, but the decision must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

~~-79-~~-51-

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this annual report:

Exhibit ~~Number~~ No.		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 15, 2005).
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 15, 2005).
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 14, 2011).
3.3		Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Annex C to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 15, 2005).
3.4		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock dated November 2, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2006).
3.5		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock dated November 2, 2006, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2006).
3.6		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 14, 2011).
3.7		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock dated March 8, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 15, 2007).
3.8		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as amended, dated February 10, 2009, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K, filed ~~herewith.~~January 17, 2012).
3.9		Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 14, 2011).
4.1		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock in favor of Imperial Bank, dated January 15, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-93131), filed December 20, 1999, as amended).
4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 9, 2007, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 15, 2007).
4.3		Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 15, 2007).
4.4		Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 25, 2007, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 26, 2007).
4.5		Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated September 25, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 26, 2007).
4.6		Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated September 5, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
4.7		Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
4.8		Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 12, 2009, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
4.9		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated February 12, 2009, issued by the ~~Registrant~~Company to BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).

~~-80-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

4.10		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated June 22 2009, issued by the ~~Registrant~~Company to BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
4.11		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated October 5, 2009, issued by the ~~Registrant~~Company to BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
4.12		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated June 9, 2011, issued by the ~~Registrant~~Company to Neal Goldman ~~(Incorporated~~(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2011).
4.13		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated December 12, 2011(~~Incporated~~incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2011).
4.14		Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 12, 2011, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December ~~21,2011)~~21, 2011).
4.15		Form of Amendment to Warrant, , dated December 14, 2011, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K, filed January 17, 2012).
4.16		Form of Amendment to Warrant, dated March 21, 2012, filed herewith.
10.1		Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2005, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 30, 2005).
10.2		Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2005, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Wayne G. Wetherell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 30, 2005).
10.3		Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated October 31, 2005, between ~~Registrant~~Company and Charles Aubuchon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2005).
10.4		Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the ~~Registrant~~Company with its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-93131), filed December 20, 1999, as amended).
10.5		Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Plan Award (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 21, 2007).
10.6		Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 14, 2005).
10.7		2001 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed November 14, 2001).
10.8		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 9, 2007, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant~~Company Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 15, 2007).
10.9		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 25, 2007, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 26, 2007).
10.10		Product Line Purchase Agreement, dated November 30, 2006, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and PhotoLynx, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 26, 2006).
10.11		Office Space Lease between I.W. Systems Canada ~~Registrant~~Company and GE Canada Real Estate Equity dated July 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.12		Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 29, 2008 by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.13		Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September 27, 2008, between ~~Registrant~~Company and Charles Aubuchon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).

~~-81-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

10.14		Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September 27, 2008, between ~~Registrant~~Company and David Harding (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.15		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2008, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.16		First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2008, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Wayne Wetherell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.17		Form of Convertible Note dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.18		Secured Note Agreement, dated February 12, 2009, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.19		Security Agreement, dated February 12, 2009, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.20		Second Amendment to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated April 6, 2009, between ~~Registrant~~Company and Charles Aubuchon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.21		Second Amendment to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated April 6, 2009, between ~~Registrant~~Company and David Harding (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.22		Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated April 6, 2009, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.23		Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated April 6, 2009, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Wayne Wetherell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.24		Waiver and Amendment Agreement to Secured Note Agreement, dated June 9, 2009 between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.25		Second Amendment to Secured Note Agreement, dated June 22, 2009 between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.26		Office Space Lease between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Allen W. Wooddell, dated July 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.27		Third Amendment to Secured Note Agreement, dated October 5, 2009 between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.28		Fourth Amendment to Secured Note Agreement, dated November 11, 2009 between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.29		Assignment of Receivable dated November 11, 2009 between the ~~Registrant~~Company and BET Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.30		Third Amendment to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated December 10, 2009, between ~~Registrant~~Company and Charles Aubuchon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.31		Third Amendment to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated December 10, 2009, between ~~Registrant~~Company and David Harding (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).

~~-82-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

10.32		Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2009, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.33		Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2009, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Wayne Wetherell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
10.34		Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 14, 2011).
10.35		Promissory Note dated June 9, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 14, 2011).
10.36		Security Agreement, amended, dated June 9, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 14, 2011).
10.37		Amendment to Secured Promissory Note dated August 5, 2011 by and among the Company and BET Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 11, 2010).
10.38		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 12, 2011, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2011).
10.39		Note Exchange Agreement, dated December 12, 2011, by and between the ~~Registrant~~Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2011).
10.40		Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 10, 2011, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and S. James Miller, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed ~~herewith.~~January 17, 2012).
10.41		Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 10, 2011, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Wayne Wetherell, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed ~~herewith.~~January 17, 2012).
10.42		Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 10, 2011, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and David Harding, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed ~~herewith.~~January 17, 2012).
10.43		Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 10, 2011, between the ~~Registrant~~Company and Charles Aubuchon, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed January 17, 2012).
10.44		Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2012, between the Company and S. James Miller, Jr., filed herewith.
10.45		Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2012, between the Company and Wayne Wetherell, filed herewith.
10.46		Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2012, between the Company and Charles AuBuchon, filed herewith.
10.47		Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2012, between the Company and David Harding, filed herewith.
21.1		~~Subsidiaries~~List of ~~the Registrant~~Subsidiaries (incorporated by ~~reference~~referenced to Exhibit 21.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 24, 2010).
23.1		Consent of ~~Vantage Point Advisors, Inc., dated January 17, 2012, filed herewith.~~Independent valuation firm.
31.1		Certification of ~~Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.~~CEO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14, filed herewith
31.2		Certification of ~~Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.~~CFO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14, filed herewith.
32.1		Certification of ~~Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to~~CEO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section ~~906~~1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley Act.~~United States Code, filed herewith.
32.2		Certification of ~~Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to~~CFO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section ~~906~~1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley Act.~~United States Code, filed herewith.
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extention Schema
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extention Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extention Definition Linkbase
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extention Label Linkbase
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extention Presentation Linkbase

*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

~~-83-~~-52-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.

Registrant Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		ImageWare Systems, Inc. /s/ S. James Miller, Jr.
		S. James Miller, Jr.
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President

Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		/s/ Wayne Wetherell
		Wayne Wetherell
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		/s/ S. James Miller, Jr.
		S. James Miller, Jr.
		Chairman of the Board

Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		/s/ John Callan
		John Callan
		Director

Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		/s/ David Loesch
		David Loesch
		Director

Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		/s/ Steve Hamm
		Steve Hamm
		Director
		/s/ David Carey
Date: ~~January 17,~~April 4, 2012		David Carey
		Director

/s/ John Cronin

Date: April 4, 2012John CroninDirector

~~-84-~~-53-

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

				Page Number
~~(1)~~
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~ 2010		F-3

		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~	2010	F-4

		Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit ~~and Comprehensive Loss~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~	2010	F-5

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010	F-8

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010		~~F-8~~F-9

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		~~F-9~~F-10

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

ImageWare Systems, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ImageWare Systems, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' deficit, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ImageWare Systems, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

San Diego, California

~~January 17,~~ April 4, 2012

F-2

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009			December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	103		$	342		$	6,773		$	103
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 and $15 at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		239			627
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 and $5 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively								348			239
Inventory, net		12			220			45			12
Other current assets		57			66			66			57
Total Current Assets		411			1,255			7,232			411

Property and equipment, net		19			41			18			19
Other assets		58			60			58			58
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization		78			94			63			78
Goodwill		3,416			3,416			3,416			3,416
Total Assets	$	3,982		$	4,866		$	10,787		$	3,982

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,161		$	955		$	1,103		$	1,161
Deferred revenue		1,073			1,335			1,066			1,073
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		241			274			—			241
Accrued expenses		1,822			1,672			2,005			1,822
Secured note payable, net of discount		—			1,696
Additional financing obligation		—			1,504
Notes payable to related parties		110			110			110			110
Total Current Liabilities		4,407			7,546			4,284			4,407

Convertible secured notes payable, net of discount		1,427			—			—			1,427
Derivative liabilities		15,653			11,603			11,824			15,653
Pension obligation		401			420			391			401
Total Liabilities		21,888			19,569			16,499			21,888

Shareholders’ equity (deficit):
Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 750,000 shares, 389,400 shares issued, and 239,400 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; liquidation preference $735 and $683 at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		2			2
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 3,500 shares, 2,500 shares issued, and 2,200 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; liquidation preference $2,956 and $2,780 at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		—			—
Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 3,000 shares, 2,310 shares issued, and 2,085 and 2,198 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively; liquidation preference $2,660 and $2,604 at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 23,845,481 and 21,258,264 shares issued at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and 23,838,777 and 21,251,560 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		237			211
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 750,000 shares, 389,400 shares issued, and 239,400 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively; liquidation preference $786 and $735 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively								2			2
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 3,500 shares, 2,500 shares issued, and 0 and 2,200 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010; liquidation preference $0 and $2,956 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively								—			—
Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated 3,000 shares, 2,310 shares issued, and 0 and 2,085 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively; liquidation preference $0 and $2,660 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively								—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 and 50,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively; 67,995,620 and 23,845,481 shares issued at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 67,988,916 and 23,838,777 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively								679			237
Additional paid-in capital		85,186			83,363			101,720			85,186
Treasury stock, at cost 6,704 shares		(64	)		(64	)		(64	)		(64	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(62	)		(86	)		(65	)		(62	)
Accumulated deficit		(103,205	)		(98,129	)		(107,984	)		(103,205	)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit		(17,906	)		(14,703	)		(5,712)			(17,906	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit	$	3,982		$	4,866		$	10,787		$	3,982

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			Year Ended December 31, 2011			Year Ended December 31, 2010
Revenues:
Product	$	3,192		$	3,430		$	2,596		$	3,192
Maintenance		2,619			2,599			2,878			2,619
		5,811			6,029			5,474			5,811
Cost of revenues:
Product		1,059			1,165			459			1,059
Maintenance		938			814			935			938
Gross profit		3,814			4,050			4,080			3,814

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		2,546			2,433			2,327			2,546
Sales and marketing		1,528			1,705			1,404			1,528
Research and development		2,531			2,367			2,664			2,531
Depreciation and amortization		50			98			28			50
		6,655			6,603			6,423			6,655
Loss from operations		(2,841	)		(2,553	)		(2,343	)		(2,841	)

Interest expense (income), net		1,123			743
Interest expense								4,851			1,123
Change in fair value of financing obligation		(551	)		1,335			—			(551	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		738			6,327			(3,970	)		738
Financing expense		—			1,373
Loss on debt modification		1,100			750			—			1,100
Other income, net		(328	)		(445	)		(25	)		(328	)
Loss before income taxes		(4,923	)		(12,636	)		(3,199	)		(4,923	)

Income tax expense		126			—
Net loss	$	(5,049	)	$	(12,636	)
Income tax (benefit) expense								(19	)		126
Net Loss							$	(3,180	)	$	(5,049	)
Preferred dividends		(396	)		(403	)		(383	)		(396	)
Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(5,445	)	$	(13,039	)	$	(3,563	)	$	(5,445	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share — see Note 2:
Operations	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.65	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share — see Note 2:
Net loss							$	(0.12	)	$	(0.22	)
Preferred dividends		(0.02	)		(0.02	)		(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share - see Note 2	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.67	)

Weighted-average shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		23,175,405			19,416,569
Basic and diluted loss per share available to common shareholders							$	(0.13	)	$	(0.24	)
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding								27,316,475			23,175,405

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2009~~2010

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	Series B Convertible,				Series C				Series D														Addit- ional			Accum- ulated Other									Series B Convertible, Redeemable Preferred			Series C Convertible, Preferred			Series D Convertible, Preferred				Common Stock			Treasury Stock					Addit- ional Paid- In			Accum- ulated Other Compre- hensive			Accum- ulated
	Redeemable				Convertible,				Convertible,														Paid-			Compre-			Accum-						Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			Loss			Deficit			Total
	Preferred				Preferred				Preferred				Common Stock				Treasury Stock						In			hensive			ulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Loss			Deficit			Total

Balance at December 31, 2008		239,400	$	2		2,200	$	-		2,198	$	-		18,163,487	$	180		(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	86,008		$	44		$	(87,202	)	$	(1,032	)
Cumulative effect of EITF 07-05		-		-		-				-		-		-		-		-			-			(5,836	)		-			1,709			(4,127	)
Issuance of common stock to consultants in lieu of cash		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			111			-			-			111
Balance at December 31, 2009																																			239,400	$	2	2,200	$	-		2,198	$	-	21,258,264	$	211	(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	83,363		$	(86	)	$	(98,129	)	$	(14,703	)
Issuance of restricted stock grants pursuant to stock exchange agreement																																			-		-	-		-		-		-	847,258		8	-			-			(8)			-			-				-
Conversion of preferred stock into common																																			-		-	-		-		(113)		-	281,428		3	-			-			24			-			(27)			-
Issuance of common stock pursuant to warrant exercises		-		-		-		-		-		-		2,741,075		27		-			-			1,343			-			-			1,370		-		-	-		-		-		-	1,000,000		10	-			-			490			-			-			500
Issuance of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises		-		-		-		-		-		-		353,702		4		-			-			(4	)		-			-			-		-		-	-		-		-		-	458,531		5	-			-			(5	)		-			-			-
Modif-ication of existing warrants		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			1,373			-			-			1,373
Issuance of warrants for financing commission in lieu of cash		-		-				-				-		-		-		-			-			122			-			-			122
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt																																			-		-	-		-		-		-	-		-	-			-			1,079			-			-			1,079
Stock-based comp-ensation expense		-		-		-		-				-		-		-					-			246			-			-			246		-		-	-		-		-		-	-		-	-			-			243			-			-			243
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			-			(176	)		-			(176	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment																																			-		-	-		-		-		-	-		-	-			-			-			(18	)		-			(18	)
Additional minimum pension liability		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			-			46			-			46		-		-	-		-		-		-	-		-	-			-			-			42			-			42
Net loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(12,636	)		(12,636	)	-		-	-		-		-		-	-		-	-			-			-			-			(5,049	)		(5,049	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		239,400	$	2		2,200	$	-		2,198	$	-		21,258,264	$	211		(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	83,363		$	(86	)	$	(98,129	)	$	(14,703	)
Balance at December 31, 2010																																			239,400	$	2	2,200	$	-		2,085	$	-	23,845,481	$	237	(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	85,186		$	(62	)	$	(103,205	)	$	(17,906	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ ~~EQUITY (DEFICIT)~~DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2009~~2010

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(continued)

Series B
Convertible,
Series C Series D
Addit
-ional

Accum-ulated
Other

Redeemable Convertible, Convertible, Paid- Compre- Accum-
Preferred Preferred Preferred Common Stock Treasury Stock In hensive ulated
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Loss Deficit Total

Issuance of common stock pursuant to warrant exercises - - - - - - 1,000,000 10 - - 490 - - 500
Issuance of restricted stock grants pursuant to stock exchange agreement - - - - - - 847,258 8 - - (8 ) - - --
Conversion of preferred stocks into common - - - - (113 ) - 281,428 3 - - 24 - (27 ) --
Issuance of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises - - - - - - 458,531 5 - - (5 ) - - -
Stock-based comp-ensation expense - - - - - - - - - - 243 - - 243
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt - - - - - - - - - - 1,079 - - 1,079
Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - - - - - - - (18 ) - (18 )
Additional minimum pension liability - - - - - - - - - - - 42 - 42
Net loss - - - - - - - - - - - - (5,049 ) (5,049 )
Balance at December 31, 2010 239,400 $ 2 2,200 $ - 2,085 $ - 23,845,481 $ 237 (6,704 ) $ (64 ) $ 85,186 $ (62 ) $ (103,205 ) $ (17,906 )

	Series B Convertible, Redeemable Preferred			Series C Convertible, Preferred			Series D Convertible, Preferred		Common Stock			Treasury Stock					Addit- ional Paid- In			Accum- ulated Other Compre- hensive			Accum- ulated
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			Loss			Deficit			Total

Balance at December 31, 2010	239,400	$	2	2,200	$	-	2,085	-	23,845,481	$	237	(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	85,186		$	(62	)	$	(103,205	)	$	(17,906	)
Issuance of common stock for cash, net of derivative liabilities and transaction costs of $706	-		-	-		-	-	-	18,500,000		185	-			-			2,734			-			-			2,919
Conversion of preferred stock into common	-		-	(2,200)		-	(2,085)	-	11,768,525		118	-			-			1,481			-			(1,599)			-
Issuance of common stock pursuant to warrant exercises	-		-	-		-	-	-	1,310,000		13	-			-			642			-			-			655
Issuance of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises	-		-	-		-	-	-	1,194,547		12	-			-			(12	)		-			-			-
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt	-		-	-		-	-	-	-		-	-			-			188			-			-			188
Issuance of common stock pursuant to repayment of debt	-		-	-		-	-	-	1,500,000		15	-			-			735			-			-			750
Issuance of common stock pursuant to conversion of accrued interest	-		-	-		-	-	-	774,559		8	-			-			379			-			-			387
Issuance of common stock pursuant to conversion of debt	-		-	-		-	-	-	9,000,000		90	-			-			4,410			-			-			4,500
Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for financing transaction costs	-		-	-		-	-	-	90,000		1	-			-			(1)			-			-			-
Recission of previously issued restricted stock grants	-		-	-		-	-	-	(12,079)		-	-			-			-			-			-			-

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

F-6

Table of Contents

Reclassification of previously bifurcated conversion option of preferred stocks and warrants	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-			-			5,672		-			-			5,672
Issuance of common stock pursuant to option exercises	-		-	-		-	-		-	14,587		-	-			-			4		-			-			4
Issuance of common stock as compensation in lieu of cash	-		-	-		-	-		-	10,000		-	-			-			13		-			-			13
Stock-based compensation expense	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-			-			289		-			-			289
Additional minimum pension liability	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-			-			-		(28	)		-			(28	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-			-			-		25			-			25
Net loss	-		-	-		-	-		-	-		-	-			-			-		-			(3,180	)		(3,180	)
Balance at December 31, 2011	239,400	$	2	-	$	-	-	$	-	67,995,620	$	679	(6,704	)	$	(64	)	$	101,720	$	(65	)	$	(107,984	)	$	(5,712	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,			Year Ended December 31,			Year Ended December 31,			Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2011			2010

Net loss	$	(5,049	)	$	(12,636	)	$	(3,180	)	$	(5,049	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Additional minimum pension liability		42			46			(28	)		42
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(18	)		(176	)		25			(18	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(5,025	)	$	(12,766	)	$	(3,183	)	$	(5,025	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~F-7~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~IMAGEWARE~~ ~~SYSTEMS, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(In thousands)~~

Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended
December 31,

2010 2009
        Cash flows from operating activities
        Net loss $ (5,049 ) $ (12,636 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
        Depreciation and amortization 50 98
        Amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs 675 387
Cha Change in fair value of additional financing obligation (551 ) 1,335
        Stock based compensation 243 357
        Change in fair value of derivative liabilities 738 6,327
        Non-cash warrant financing expense 74 1,552
        Loss on debt modification 1,100 750
        Change in assets and liabilities
        Accounts receivable 388 (124 )
        Inventory 209 (203 )
        Other assets 20 105
        Accounts payable 206 (1,433 )
        Accrued expenses 151 144
        Deferred revenue (262 ) 463
        Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts (33 ) (5 )
        Pension obligation (28 ) 9

        Total adjustments 2,979 9,762

        Net cash used by operating activities (2,070 ) (2,874 )

        Cash flows from investing activities
        Purchase of property and equipment (13 ) (16 )

        Net cash used by investing activities (13 ) (16 )

        Cash flows from financing activities
        Proceeds from issuance of notes payable with warrants 5,750 2,325
        Repayment of notes payable (4,430 ) (350 )
        Financing costs - (154 )
        Proceeds from exercise of stock purchase warrants 500 1,370

        Net cash provided by financing activities 1,820 3,191
        Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 24 (130 )
        Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (239 ) 171

        Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 342 171

        Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 103 $ 342

        Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
        Cash paid for interest $ 418 $ 3
        Cash paid for income taxes $ — $ —
        Summary of non-cash investing and financing activities:
        Issuance of additional financing obligation with secured debt $ — $ 169
        Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt $ 1,079 $ —
        Non-cash fees added to secured notes payable $ 85 $ 12
Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock grants $ 8 $ —
        Issuance of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises $ 5 $ 4
        Conversion of preferred stock into common stock $ 27 $ —
Additional financing obligation issued with notes payable $ — $ 169
        Warrants issued with notes payable $ 3,238 $ 1,093
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 815 $ — $ 5,836

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

F-8

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,			Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(3,180	)	$	(5,049	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		28			50
Amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs		4,448			675
Change in fair value of additional financing obligation		—			(551	)
Stock based compensation		289			243
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(3,970	)		738
Non-cash warrant financing expense		—			74
Stock issued in lieu of cash		13			—
Loss on debt modification		—			1,100
Change in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(109	)		388
Inventory		(33	)		209
Other assets		(9	)		20
Accounts payable		(58	)		206
Accrued expenses		570			150
Deferred revenue		(7	)		(262	)
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		(241	)		(33	)
Pension obligation		(10	)		(28	)

Total adjustments		911			2,979

Net cash used by operating activities		(2,269	)		(2,070	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(11	)		(13	)

Net cash used by investing activities		(11	)		(13	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		1,250			5,750
Repayment of notes payable		(1,500	)		(4,430	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net		8,544			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		4			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock purchase warrants		655			500

Net cash provided by financing activities		8,953			1,820

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(3	)		24
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		6,670			(239	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		103		342

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	6,773	$	103

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	—	$	418
Cash paid for income taxes	$	—	$	—
Summary of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of notes payable and related interest to common stock	$	5,637	$	—
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt	$	188	$	1,079
Non-cash fees added to secured notes payable	$	—	$	85
Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock grants	$	—	$	8
Issuance of common stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises	$	12	$	5
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock	$	1,599	$	27
Reclassification of previously bifurcated conversion option on warrants and preferred stocks	$	5,672	$	—
Warrants issued with notes payable	$	188	$	3,238

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9

Table of Contents

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

Overview

~~The Company was~~ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) is incorporated in the state of ~~California in 1987 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2005.~~Delaware. The Company is a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions. Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, the Company creates software that provides a highly reliable indication of a person’s identity. The Company’s “flagship” product is the patented IWS Biometric Engine®. The Company’s products are used to manage and issue secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver licenses and access control credentials. The Company’s products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot, fingerprint LiveScan and investigative capabilities. The Company also provides comprehensive authentication security software using biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or computer networks or Internet sites. Biometric technology is now an integral part of all markets the Company addresses and all of the products are integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine.

Recent Developments

On December 20, 2011, the Company consummated an equity financing resulting in gross proceeds of $10.0 million (“Qualified Financing”), including the $750,000 of promissory notes converted into the Qualified Financing. In connection with the Qualified Financing, the Company issued ~~20.0 million~~20,000,000 shares of its common stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase 12,207,500 shares of its common stock exercisable for $0.50 per share (“Warrants”)., which number includes 2,207,500 shares issuable upon exchange of warrants issued to MDB Capital Group in consideration for acting as a placement agent in connection with the Qualified Financing. The Warrants expire five years from the date of grant. In connection with the Qualified Financing, the Company also issued 90,000 shares of common stock and a warrant exercisable for 45,000 shares of common stock in lieu of cash in payment for legal fees related to the Qualified Financing. That Warrant also has a five year life and is exercisable for $0.50 per share. Further, warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50, which expire two years from the date of grant, were issued to a significant investor to cover certain expenses related to and in anticipation of the Qualified Financing.

The Company evaluated the warrants issued pursuant to the Qualified Financing under the provisions of ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity-Scope and Scope Exceptions” and determined that 12,252,500 of the warrants require derivative liability classification. Accordingly, we recorded approximately $5,626,000 in derivative liability based on the grant date fair value of the warrants as determined by the Black Scholes valuation model.

As a result of the Qualified Financing, the Company’s Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”) and Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred”) were automatically converted into 11,768,525 shares of common stock. In addition, in connection with the Qualified Financing, (i) the anti-dilution provision contained in certain of the Company's existing warrants were amended resulting in such warrants no longer qualifying as derivative liabilities; and (ii) a significant investor ("Investor") exchanged $4.5 million principal amount of convertible promissory notes of the Company ("Exchanged Notes"), and accrued but unpaid interest on the Exchanged Notes and on an additional $2.25 million in promissory notes, into 9,774,559 shares of the Company’s common stock ("Exchange Shares"). The Investor also agreed to convert $750,000 principal amount of additional promissory notes held by the Investor and invest the proceeds into the Qualified Financing.

During the first three quarters of fiscal 2010, the Company was faced with limited funds for operations. As a result, the Company has taken measures to reduce operating costs. Management believes that the Company’s current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of the filing of this Annual Report and that the Company will have sufficient liquidity to fund its business and meet its contractual obligations over a period beyond the next 12 months. However, the Company may be required to obtain additional financing in order to fund continued operations. Due to the tightening of the credit markets, general economic conditions, the Company’s SEC filing delinquencies and other economic and business factors, this financing may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. Although the Company cannot accurately anticipate the effect of inflation or foreign exchange markets on our operations, the Company does not believe these external economic forces have had, or are likely in the foreseeable future to have, a material impact on our results of operations.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

~~F-9~~F-10

Table of Contents

Operating Cycle

Assets and liabilities related to long-term contracts are included in current assets and current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, although they will be liquidated in the normal course of contract completion which may take more than one operating cycle.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, calculation of the Company’s tax provision, inventory obsolescence reserve, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, accounting for loss contingencies, recoverability of goodwill and acquired intangible assets and amortization periods, assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of share based payments, assumptions used in the application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair value of derivative liabilities and revenue and cost of revenues recognized under the percentage of completion method. Actual results could differ from estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

~~Cash and~~The Company defines cash equivalents ~~consist primarily~~as highly liquid investments with original maturities of ~~cash on deposit, certificates~~less than 90 days that are not held for sale in the ordinary course of ~~deposit, and money market accounts.~~business.

Accounts Receivable

In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit without collateral requirements to its customers that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are considered delinquent when the due date on the invoice has passed. The Company records its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its assessment of various factors. The Company considers historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, the credit quality of its customers, current economic conditions and other factors that may affect customers’ ability to pay to determine the level of allowance required. Accounts receivable are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when all collection efforts by the Company have been unsuccessful.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the average cost method, or market.

Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Property and equipment, consisting of furniture and equipment, are stated at cost and are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals or improvements are capitalized. When assets are sold or abandoned, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Expenditures for leasehold improvements are capitalized. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenues and notes payable to related parties, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks.

F-11

Table of Contents

The Company reviews the terms of the common and preferred stock, warrants and convertible debt it issues to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options, which are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as derivative financial instruments. In circumstances where the host instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including the conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

Bifurcated embedded derivatives are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value reported as non-operating income or expense. When the equity or convertible debt instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds received are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the host instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value.

The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest expense, using the effective interest method.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from the following major revenue sources:

	●	Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant customization
	●	Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization

	●	Software licensing
	●	Sales of computer hardware and identification media

●

Postcontract customer support (PCS)

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are consistent with U.S. GAAP including the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition”, ASC 605-35 “Revenue Recognition, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”, “Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104”, and ASC 605-25 “Revenue Recognition, Multiple Element Arrangements”. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company recognizes revenue and profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts involving significant amount of hardware and software customization using the percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs at completion. The primary components of costs incurred are third party software and direct labor cost including fringe benefits. Revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed are classified as current assets under “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts”. Amounts billed to customers in excess of revenues recognized are classified as current liabilities under “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts”. Revenue from contracts for which the Company cannot reliably estimate total costs or there are not significant amounts of customization are recognized upon completion. The Company also generates non-recurring revenue from the licensing of its software. Software license revenue is recognized upon the execution of a license agreement, upon deliverance, when fees are fixed and determinable, when collectability is probable and when all other significant obligations have been fulfilled. The Company also generates revenue from the sale of computer hardware and identification media. Revenue for these items is recognized upon delivery of these products to the customer. The Company’s revenue from periodic maintenance agreements is generally recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods provided no significant obligations remain and collectability of the related receivable is probable. Pricing of maintenance contracts is consistent period to period and calculated as a percentage of the software or hardware revenue which is approximately 15% annually. Amounts collected in advance for maintenance services are included in current liabilities under "Deferred revenue". Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from revenue.

~~F-10~~F-12

Table of Contents

~~Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements~~

Property and equipment, consisting of furniture and equipment, are stated at cost and are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals or improvements are capitalized. When assets are sold or abandoned, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Expenditures for leasehold improvements are capitalized. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

~~Inventories~~

~~Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the average cost method or market.~~

Goodwill

The Company accounts for its intangible assets under the provisions of ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”. In accordance with ASC 350, intangible assets with a definite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360-10-05 “Property, Plant and Equipment” and intangible assets with an indefinite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC ~~360.~~360 annually, or more often if circumstances dictate. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year. In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill, or the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired ~~is no longer amortized but~~ is tested for impairment using a fair value approach at the “reporting unit” level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below that operating segment (referred to as a component) if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at the component level. The Company’s reporting unit is at the entity level. The Company recognizes an impairment charge for any amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value. The Company uses fair value methodologies to establish fair values.

The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the years ended December 31, ~~2010 and 2009.~~2011 or 2010.

Intangible and Long Lived Assets

Intangible assets are carried at their cost less any accumulated amortization. Any costs incurred to renew or extend the life of an intangible or long lived asset are reviewed for capitalization. The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times during the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 exceeded the FDIC insurance limits of $250,000 for ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009.~~2010. Sales are typically made on credit and the Company generally does not require collateral. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company considers historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, the credit quality of its customers, current economic conditions and other factors that may affect customers’ ability to pay to determine the level of allowance required. Accounts receivable are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately ~~$5,000~~$4,000 and ~~$15,000~~$5,000 at December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2011 one customer accounted for approximately 34%, or $1,836,000 of total revenues and had trade receivables of $0 as of the end of the year. For the year ended December 31, 2010 two customers accounted for approximately 31%, or $1,803,000 of total revenues and had trade receivables of approximately ~~$15,000. For~~$15,000 as of the ~~year ended December 31, 2009 two customers accounted for approximately 23%, or $1,412,000~~end of ~~total revenues and had trade receivables of approximately $286,000.~~the year.

~~F-11~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Stock Based Compensation

At December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company had two stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee directors, which authorize the granting of various equity-based incentives including stock options and restricted stock.

F-13

Table of Contents

The Company estimates the fair value of its stock options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with the provisions of ASC ~~No.~~ 718,~~, Compensation~~ “Compensation – Stock ~~Compensation~~Compensation”. The fair value of stock options granted is recognized to expense over the requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line single-option method. Stock-based compensation expense is reported in ~~selling, general and~~operating expenses based upon the departments to which substantially all of the associated employees report and credited to additional paid-in-capital. Stock-based compensation expense related to equity options was approximately ~~$243,000~~$250,000 and ~~$246,000~~$204,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In January 2010, the Company issued 847,258 shares of restricted stock to members of management and ~~2009, respectively.~~the Board. These shares will vest quarterly over a three-year period. The restricted shares were issued as compensation for the cancellation of 1,412,096 options held by members of management and the Board. The Company evaluated the exchange in accordance with ASC 718 and determined there was no incremental cost to be recorded in conjunction with the exchange as the fair value of the options surrendered at the modification date exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued at the modification date. The Company recorded approximately $39,000 in compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to these restricted shares.

ASC 718 requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. ~~For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the~~The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The Company is required to make various assumptions in the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company has determined that the best measure of expected volatility is based on the historical weekly volatility of the Company’s common stock. Historical volatility factors utilized in the Company’s Black-Scholes computations ~~range~~for years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 ranged from ~~64%~~135% to ~~119%~~144%. The Company has elected to estimate the expected life of an award based upon the SEC approved “simplified method” noted under the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The expected term used by the Company ~~as computed by this method range from 5.5~~during the years ~~to 6.1~~ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was 5.9 years. The difference between the actual historical expected life and the simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is the risk free interest rate and is based upon ~~U. S.~~U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in the Company’s Black-Scholes calculations ~~range from 4.1% to 4.6%~~for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 averaged 2.6%. Dividend yield is zero as the Company does not expect to declare any dividends on the Company’s common shares in the foreseeable future.

In addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model, the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation is a critical assumption. The Company has estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of approximately ~~10%~~9.7% for corporate officers, 4%4.1% for members of the Board of Directors and 6%6.0% for all other employees. The Company reviews the expected forfeiture rate annually to determine if that percent is still reasonable based on historical experience.

Income Taxes

Current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is computed for the expected future impact of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

~~F-12~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the foreign subsidiary’s local currency as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses of such subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, unless there is a sale or complete liquidation of the underlying foreign investments. The Company translates foreign currencies of its German, Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries. The cumulative translation adjustment, which is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, increased approximately $25,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and decreased approximately $18,000 for the year ended December 31, ~~2010 and decreased approximately $176,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.~~2010.

F-14

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net gains and losses affecting shareholders’ ~~equity~~deficit that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net ~~income (loss).~~loss. For the Company, the only items are the cumulative translation adjustment and the additional minimum liability related to the Company’s defined benefit pension plan, recognized pursuant to ASC 715-30, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans – Pension".

~~Revenue Recognition~~

~~The Company recognizes revenue from the following major revenue sources:~~

	■	~~Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant customization~~
	■	~~Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization~~

	■	~~Software licensing~~
	■	~~Sales of computer hardware and identification media~~

■

~~Postcontract customer support (PCS)~~

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are consistent with U.S. GAAP including ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition”, ASC 605-35 “Revenue Recognition, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”, “Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, and ASC 605-25 “Revenue Recognition , Multiple Element Arrangements”. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company recognizes revenue and profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts involving significant amount of hardware and software customization using the percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs at completion. The primary components of costs incurred are third party software and direct labor cost including fringe benefits. Revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed are classified as current assets under “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts”. Amounts billed to customers in excess of revenues recognized are classified as current liabilities under “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. Revenue from contracts for which the Company cannot reliably estimate total costs or there are not significant amounts of customization are recognized upon completion. The Company also generates non-recurring revenue from the licensing of its software. Software license revenue is recognized upon the execution of a license agreement, upon deliverance, when fees are fixed and determinable, when collectability is probable and when all other significant obligations have been fulfilled. The Company also generates revenue from the sale of computer hardware and identification media. Revenue for these items is recognized upon delivery of these products to the customer. The Company’s revenue from periodic maintenance agreements is generally recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods provided no significant obligations remain and collectability of the related receivable is probable. Amounts collected in advance for maintenance services are included in current liabilities under "Deferred revenues". Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from revenue.

~~F-13~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company did not incur any advertising expense during the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009.~~2010.

Loss Per Share

Basic loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common shareholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common shareholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, ~~increased~~adjusted to include, if dilutive, ~~the number~~potential dilutive shares consisting of ~~additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued at the date of issuance. The dilutive effect of outstanding~~convertible preferred stock, convertible notes payable, stock options ~~are included in the calculation of diluted loss per common share, if dilutive,~~and warrants, calculated using the treasury stock ~~method. During~~and if-converted methods. For diluted loss per share calculation purposes, the ~~years ended December 31, 2010~~net loss available to commons shareholders is adjusted to add back any preferred stock dividends and ~~2009,~~any interest on convertible debt reflected in the consolidated statement of operations for the respective periods.

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss	$	(3,180	)	$	(5,049	)
Preferred dividends		(383	)		(396	)
Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(3,563	)	$	(5,445	)

Denominator for basic loss per share — weighted-average shares outstanding		27,316,475			23,175,405
Effect of dilutive securities		—			—
Denominator for diluted loss per share — weighted-average shares outstanding		27,316,475			23,175,405

Basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.22	)
Preferred dividends		(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.24	)

The Company has excluded the following weighted-average securities from the calculation of diluted loss per share, as their effect would have been ~~anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss:~~antidilutive:

Potential Dilutive Securities:
Number of
Common Shares
Convertible into
at
December 31,
2010

Number of
Common Shares
Convertible into
at
December 31,
2009

         Convertible notes payable 10,700,109 215,803
         Convertible preferred stock – Series B 54,784 51,153
         Convertible preferred stock – Series C 5,854,290 5,502,290
         Convertible preferred stock – Series D 5,249,296 5,192,618
         Stock options 1,463,295 2,300,038
         Restricted stock grants 360,000 360,000
         Warrants 19,737,612 14,448,253
         Total Potential Dilutive Securities 43,419,386 28,070,155

~~The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:~~

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Years Ended
December 31,

2010 2009
         Numerator – net loss :
         Net loss $ (5,049 ) $ (12,636 )
         Less preferred stock dividends (396 ) (403 )
         Net loss available to common shareholders $ (5,445 ) $ (13,039 )

         Denominator
         Weighted-average shares outstanding 23,175,405 19,416,569

         Basic and diluted loss per share:
         Operations $ (0.22 ) $ (0.65 )
         Preferred dividends $ (0.02 ) $ (0.02 )
         Net loss per common share $ (0.24 ) $ (0.67 )

Potential Dilutive Securities:	Common Share Equivalents at December 31, 2011		Common Share Equivalents at December 31, 2010
Convertible notes payable		205,255		10,700,109
Convertible preferred stock – Series B		58,415		54,784
Convertible preferred stock – Series C		—		5,854,290
Convertible preferred stock – Series D		—		5,249,296
Stock options		1,707,713		1,463,295
Restricted stock grants		360,000		360,000
Warrants		28,453,760		19,737,612
Total Potential Dilutive Securities		30,785,143		43,419,386

~~F-14~~F-15

Table of Contents

~~Segment Information~~

Prior to its acquisitions during 2001 of G & A, Castleworks and E-Focus, the Company operated in one business segment. With its acquisition of G & A, Castleworks and E-Focus, the Company determined it was comprised of three reportable segments based on the management approach as prescribed by ASC 280, Segment Reporting. These segments were determined to be: Law Enforcement, Identification and Digital Photography. With the sale of its entire Digital Photography product line in November 2006, the Company reassessed the composition of its operating segments and determined that it no longer operates in separate, distinct market segments but rather operates in one market segment, that segment being identity management. The Company’s determination was based on fundamental changes in the Company’s business structure due to the consolidation of operations, restructuring of the Company’s operations and management team, and the integration of what where previously distinct, mutually exclusive technologies. This has resulted in changes in the manner by which the Company’s chief decision maker assesses performance and makes decisions concerning resource allocation.

~~New~~Recently Issued Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~Standards

FASB ASU 2010-06. In January 2010, the FASB issued ~~FASB Accounting Standards Update, or~~ ASU 2010-06, which amends the disclosure requirements relating to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. New disclosures are required about transfers into and out of the ~~levels~~Levels 1 and 2 fair value hierarchy and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. This ASU also requires an entity to present information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for significant unobservable inputs on a gross basis rather than as a net number. This ASU was effective for us with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures on the roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which ~~will become~~became effective for ~~us with~~ the ~~reporting period~~Company beginning ~~October~~January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations, as it only requires additional disclosures.

FASB ASU ~~2010-29~~2010-29. . In December 2010, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~ ASU 2010-29, which requires an entity to disclose revenue and earnings of a combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual period only. It also requires pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of the material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The ~~Company does not expect the~~ adoption of ASU 2010-29 ~~to have a material~~did not impact on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements as there were no business combinations to report.

~~F-15~~

~~Table of Contents~~

FASB ASU 2011-08. In September 2011 the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2011-08, ~~Goodwill~~“Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for ~~Impairment,~~ ~~(“ASU 2011-08”)~~Impairment”. This new accounting standard simplifies goodwill impairment tests and states that a qualitative assessment may be performed to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The ~~Company does not expect the~~ adoption of ASU 2011-08 todid not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU ~~2011-09~~2011-11. The FASB has issued ~~Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80)~~ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU 2011-09 is intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitmentsOffsetting Assets and ~~risks involved with participating in multiemployer pension plans.~~Liabilities”. The amendments in this ASU ~~will~~ require ~~additional~~an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Coinciding with the release of ASU No. 2011-11, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to International Financial Reporting Standards 7). This amendment requires disclosures about ~~an employer’s participation~~the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities common to those in ~~a multiemployer pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily~~ASU 2011-11. An entity is required to apply the ~~historical contributions made to the plans. ASU 2011-09 applies to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For public entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective~~amendments for annual reporting periods ~~for fiscal years ending~~beginning on or after ~~December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for~~January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual ~~periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09~~periods. An entity should ~~be applied~~provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all ~~prior~~comparative periods presented. The Company does not expect the adoption of ~~ASU 2011-09~~this pronouncement to have a material impact on ~~the Company’s~~its consolidated financial statements.

F-16

Table of Contents

FASB ASU 2011-12. The FASB has issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05”. The amendments to the Codification in ASU 2011-12 are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, so that entities will not be required to comply with the presentation requirements in ASU 2011-05 that ASU 2011-12 is deferring. In order to defer only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in ASU 2011-12 supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by ASU 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications were made to ~~prior years’~~the 2010 consolidated financial statements in order to conform to the ~~current year presentation. There was no~~presentation of the 2011 consolidated financial statements. The reclassifications did not have any effect on previously reported shareholders’ deficit, net loss or net cash ~~flows as a result of such reclassifications.~~flows.

3. FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with ASC ~~Topic No.~~ 820, “~~Fair~~“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,,” ~~(“Topic No. 820”)~~ which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

ASC ~~Topic~~ 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC ~~Topic~~ 820 are described below:

Level 1

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

~~F-16~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by ASC ~~Topic~~ 820, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair Value at December 31, 2009
($ in thousands) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Assets:
  Pension assets $ 1,349 $ 1,349 $ — $
—

  Totals $ 1,349 $ 1,349 $ — $
—

Liabilities:
  Additional financing obligation $ 1,504 $ — $ — $ 1,504
  Derivative liabilities $ 11,603 $ — $ — $ 11,603
Totals $ 13,107 $ — $ — $ 13,107

F-17

Table of Contents

	Fair Value at December 31, 2011
($ in thousands)	Total		Level 1			Level 2	Level 3

Assets:
Pension assets	$	1,455	$	1,455	$	—	$	—
Totals	$	1,455	$	1,455	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	11,824	$	—	$	—	$	11,824
Totals	$	11,824	$	—	$	—	$	11,824

	Fair Value at December 31, 2010
($ in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets:
Pension assets	$	1,369	$	1,369	$	—	$	—
Totals	$	1,369	$	1,369	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	15,653	$	—	$	—	$	15,653
Totals	$	15,653	$	—	$	—	$	15,653

The Company’s pension assets are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using market prices. The pension assets are primarily comprised of the cash surrender value of insurance contracts. All plan assets are managed in a policyholder pool in Germany by outside investment managers. The investment objectives for the plan are the preservation of capital, current income and long-term growth of capital.

The fair value of the Company’s secured notes payable and additional financing obligation are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using pricing models that incorporate management assumptions that cannot be corroborated with observable market data. The Company uses various pricing models that are consistent with what other market participants would use. Significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the note and the additional financing obligation include the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model and Monte-Carlo simulation methodologies used to value the additional financing obligation and the warrants issued to the Lender. The determination of fair value of the additional financing obligation and warrants issued to the lender using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and Monte-Carlo simulation methodologies is affected by the stock price as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility over the term of these instruments. The Company calculated the expected volatility assumptions based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock.

~~F-17~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Beginning January 1, 2009, the Company recorded~~records derivative liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet ~~as derivative liabilities~~ related to certain common stock warrants and the conversion feature embedded in its Series C and Series D Preferred Stock. The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using pricing models that incorporate management assumptions that cannot be corroborated with observable market data. The Company uses Monte-Carlo simulation methodologies and the Black Scholes option pricing model in the determination of the fair value of the derivative liabilities. The Monte-Carlo simulation methodologies isare affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility over the term of the derivative liabilities in addition to the probability of future financings. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock prices as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility of the term of the derivative liabilities in addition to interest rates and dividend yields.

Prior to the settlement of the Company’s secured notes payable and additional financing obligation in full in 2010, the fair value of the Company’s additional financing obligation was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they were valued using pricing models that incorporated management assumptions that could not be corroborated with observable market data. The Company utilized various pricing models that were consistent with what other market participants would use. Significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the additional financing obligation included the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determination of fair value of the additional financing obligation using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was affected by the stock price as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility over the term of these instruments. The Company calculated the expected volatility assumptions based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock.

The Company monitors the activity within each level and any changes with the underlying valuation techniques or inputs utilized to recognize if any transfers between levels are necessary. That determination is made, in part, by working with outside valuation experts for Level 3 instruments and monitoring market related data and other valuation inputs for Level 1 and Level 2 instruments.

F-18

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows:

($ in thousands)	Additional Financing Obligation			Derivative Liabilities		Additional Financing Obligation			Derivative Liabilities

Balance December 31, 2008	$	—		$	—
Cumulative adjustment of the fair value of derivative liabilities
as of January 1, 2009		—			4,128
Balance December 31, 2009						$	1,504		$	11,603
Included in earnings		1,335			6,327		(551	)		738
Settlements							(2,108	)		—
Issuances		169			1,148		1,155			3,312
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	1,504		$	11,603
Total unrealized gains		—			—
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3							—			—
Balance at December 31, 2010						$	—		$	15,653
Included in earnings		(551	)		738		—			(3,970	)
Settlements		(2,108	)		—		—			(5,672	)
Issuances		1,155			3,312		—			5,813
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—		—			—
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	15,653
Balance at December 31, 2011						$	—		$	11,824

All unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in value of any Level 3 instruments are reflected as a separate line in the consolidated statement of operations in arriving at net loss. The Company is not a party to any hedge arrangements, commodity swap agreement or any other derivative financial instruments. See further disclosures regarding the Company’s derivative liabilities in Note 11.

~~F-18~~

~~Table of Contents~~

4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

The following table presents the changes in the carrying amounts of the Company’s acquired intangible assets for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009.~~2010. All intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives with no estimated residual values.

($ in thousands)	Total			Total
Balance of intangible assets as of January 1, 2009	$	110
Balance of intangible assets as of December 31, 2009				$	94
Intangible assets acquired					—
Amortization					(16	)
Impairment losses					—

Balance of intangible assets as of December 31, 2010				$	78
Intangible assets acquired		—			—
Amortization of intangible assets recorded during year ended December 31, 2009		(16	)
Impairment losses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009		—

Balance of intangible assets as of December 31, 2009	$	94

Intangible assets acquired		—
Amortization of intangible assets recorded during year ended December 30, 2010		(16	)
Impairment losses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010		—
Balance of intangible assets as of December 31, 2010	$	78
Amortization					(15	)
Impairment losses					—
Balance of intangible assets as of December 31, 2011				$	63

The Company annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a need, tests the carrying amount of goodwill for impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year. A two-step impairment test is used to first identify potential goodwill impairment and then measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. These tests were conducted by determining and comparing the fair value, employing the market approach, of the Company’s reporting ~~units~~unit to the carrying value of the reporting unit. ~~In 2006, the~~The Company ~~determined that its~~continues to have only one reporting unit, is Identity Management. Based on the results of these impairment tests, the Company determined that its goodwill ~~assets were~~was not impaired as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009.~~2010.

F-19

Table of Contents

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 was approximately ~~$16,000.~~$15,000 and $16,000, respectively.

The estimated acquired intangible amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,	Estimated Amortization Expense ($ in thousands)		EstimatedAmortization Expense ($ in thousands)
2012	$	16	$	16
2013		16		16
2014		16		16
2015		16		15
2016		14		—
Thereafter		—		—
Totals	$	78	$	63

~~F-19~~

~~Table of Contents~~

5. RELATED PARTIES

As more fully described in Note 10 to these consolidated financial statements, on November 14, 2008, the Company entered into a series of convertible promissory notes (the “Related Party Convertible Notes”), aggregating $110,000, with certain officers and members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Related Party Convertible Notes bear interest at 7.0% per annum and were originally due February 14, ~~2009 for which~~2009. The Company continues to seek a ~~forbearance~~ waiver ~~was obtained which is more fully described in Note 10.~~from the holders of the Related Party Convertible Notes.

In conjunction with the issuance of the Related Party Convertible Notes, the Company issued an aggregate of 149,996 warrants to the note holders to purchase Common Stock of the Company. The warrants have an exercise price $0.55 per share and may be exercised at any time from November 14, 2008 until November 14, 2013. All warrants were outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

6. INVENTORY

Inventories at December 31, 2011 were comprised of work in process of $29,000 representing direct labor costs on in-process projects and finished goods of $16,000, net of reserves for obsolete and slow-moving items of $3,000. Inventories at December 31, 2010 were comprised of work in process of $7,000 representing direct labor costs on in-process projects and finished goods of $5,000, net of reserves for obsolete and slow-moving items of $2,000. Inventories at December 31, 2009 were comprised of work in process of $51,000 representing direct labor costs on in-process projects and finished goods of $169,000 net of reserves for obsolete and slow-moving items of $79,000. Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration, and other factors in evaluating net realizable value and required reserve levels.

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment at December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, consists of:

($ in thousands)	2010			2009			2011			2010

Equipment	$	820		$	1,472		$	770		$	820
Leasehold improvements		—			31
Furniture		66			162			66			66
		886			1,665			836			886
Less accumulated depreciation		(867	)		(1,624	)		(818	)		(867	)
	$	19		$	41		$	18		$	19

~~F-23~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company recorded the Note and Additional Financing Obligation net of a discount equal to the fair values allocated to the various financial instruments issued to the Lender. The warrants issued in conjunction with the Note contained anti-dilution provisions, which require derivative liability classification (see Note ~~11)~~11). The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation, which resulted in note discount from the issuance of the warrants of approximately $562,000. The Company recorded the Additional Financing Obligation equal to the fair values of the additional financing component using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which resulted in additional note discount of approximately $169,000. In addition, the Company accreted the $400,000 minimum payment to interest expense over the term of the agreement.

F-22

Table of Contents

The Note is secured by all of the assets of the Company. Under the terms of the Note, the entire outstanding balance together with all accrued interest shall be payable on (i) the maturity date (June 30, 2010), (ii) a change of control transaction, (iii) receipt by the Company of proceeds from the sale of equity or equity linked securities of the Company in excess of $2,500,000, (iv) receipt by the Company of proceeds from the issuance by the Company of any type of additional debt instruments, or (v) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of the Note.

In June 2009, the Lender and the Company agreed to amend the Note (“Amendment No. 1”) whereby the Company received a waiver of default and extension of certain date sensitive covenants contained in the Note. As consideration for the waiver and extension, the Company issued to the Lender warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Such warrants may be exercised at any time from June 9, 2009 until June 9, 2014. In conjunction with the June 2009 waiver and extension, the interest rate on the Note was changed to 9% per annum, retroactive to February 2009.

The Company evaluated the waiver of default and interest rate change under ASC 470-50, Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments, (ASC 470-50) to determine if the modification was substantial. The Company determined that because the change in fair value of the debt instruments was greater than 10% of the present value of the cash flows between the modified debt instruments and original debt instruments, the debt modification was substantial and therefore the Company accounted for the modification as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, the Company recorded the new debt instrument at fair value and recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of approximately $750,000 during 2009. The loss on debt extinguishment of $750,000 includes approximately $132,000 of unamortized deferred financing fees written off due to the debt extinguishment. The Company recorded the new debt instruments net of a discount equal to the fair values allocated to the various financial instruments issued to the Lender. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation, which resulted in a note discount from the issuance of the warrants of approximately $188,000. The Company is accreting the note discount and the Additional Financing Obligation discount using the effective interest rate method over the life of the Note.

In June 2009, the Lender and the Company further amended the Note (“Amendment No. 2”) whereby the Lender advanced the Company an additional $350,000 and amended certain terms of the Note. As consideration for the additional advance, the Company issued to the Lender warrants to purchase 700,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Such warrants may be exercised at any time from June 22, 2009 until June 22, 2014.

The Company recorded Amendment No. 2 net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to warrants. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation analysis, which resulted in a note discount from the issuance of the warrants of approximately $238,000.

~~F-24~~

~~Table of Contents~~

In October 2009, the Lender and the Company further amended the Note (“Amendment No. 3”) whereby the Lender agreed to make additional advances in an aggregate amount up to $1,000,000 (“Third Amendment Advance”) to only be used for the purpose of compromising certain of the Company’s outstanding vendor payables or for paying for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The amendment calls for the Company to repay the lender in full the amount of any and all Third Amendment Advances, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, on or before January 31, 2010. On October 5, 2009, the Lender made an advance of $300,000 to the Company pursuant to these provisions. As consideration for the additional advance, the Company issued to the Lender warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. Such warrants may be exercised at any time from October 5, 2009 until October 5, 2014. As additional consideration, the Company assigned certain patents related to discontinued product lines to the Lender with the condition that the Company would participate in future proceeds generated from efforts by the Lender to monetize the patents.

The Company recorded the Amendment No. 3 borrowing net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to warrants and the patent assignment. The warrants issued in conjunction with the Third Amendment Advance contained anti-dilution provisions, which require derivative liability classification (see Note ~~11)~~11). The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants using a Monte-Carlo simulation analysis, which resulted in a note discount from the issuance of the warrants of approximately $105,000. The Company estimated the fair value of the patent assignment to be $0 based on the unsuccessful attempt to monetize the patents.

F-23

Table of Contents

On November 4, 2009, the Lender and the Company amended the Note (“Amendment No. 4”) whereby the Lender made an additional $350,000 advance (the “Additional Advance”) under the Note. As consideration for the Additional Advance, the Company executed an assignment of all accounts receivable (the “Assignment of Receivables”) whereby the Company assigned to the Lender all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in all accounts receivable as of the date of Amendment No. 4. In December 2009, the Company paid back the $350,000 advance plus accrued interest.

In December 2009, the Lender advanced an additional $325,000 under Amendment No. 3. In December 2009, the Lender added approximately $12,000 in legal fees to the principal balance of the ~~note.~~Note.

In February 2010, the Lender and the Company further amended the Note (“Amendment No. 5”) whereby the Lender extended the due date of amounts due on January 31, 2010 to March 15, 2010.

In March 2010, the Lender and the Company further amended the Note (“Amendment No. 6”) whereby the Lender made an additional advance of $250,000 under the Note. As consideration for the advance, the Company will pay the Lender additional interest on the maturity date or such earlier date as may be required under the terms of the Note in an amount equal to 200,000 multiplied by the average of the closing prices for the common stock of the Company for the ten trading day period immediately preceding the date of the payment of such interest payment. As additional consideration for making the advance, the Company assigned to the Lender its rights, title and interest in and to fifty percent of certain after-cost proceeds that may be received in connection with the Company’s prosecution of certain commercial tort claims (including, but not limited to, claims related to the infringement of the Company’s intellectual property). In conjunction with Amendment No. 6, the interest rate on the Note was changed to 10% per annum, retroactive to February 2009. Also in conjunction with Amendment No. 6, the Lender extended the due dates of amounts due on March 15, 2010 to June 30, 2010.

In conjunction with Amendments No. 5 and No. 6, the Lender added an aggregate of $15,000 to the ~~note~~Note principal during 2010.

The Company recorded the borrowing under Amendment No. 6 net of a discount equal to the fair value of the change in the additional interest obligation of approximately $140,000. The Company estimated the fair value of the change in the additional interest obligation using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: term of 0.3 years, a risk free interest rate of 0.20%, a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility of 107%.

~~F-25~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Amendments Nos. 2 through 6 were evaluated under ASC 470-50, ~~Debtor’s~~ “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt ~~Instruments~~Instruments”, ~~(ASC 470-50)~~ to determine if the modification was substantial. Based on such analysis, the Company determined that such amendments were not substantial.

In June 2010, the Company did not repay the outstanding note principal and interest due under the terms of the Note, which were due on June 30, 2010. In August 2010, the Company further amended the Note (“Amendment No. 7”) whereby the Lender extended the maturity date to September 15, 2010. The Note was further amended to allow the Company a 60 day grace period beyond September 15, 2010 if, prior to September 15, 2010, the Company can deliver a customer contract (or contracts) sufficient to generate aggregate revenue of not less than $25 million. In conjunction with the amendment, the Company agreed to pay a $50,000 amendment fee (such fee to be added to the principal balance of the Note as of the date of the amendment). The Company also agreed to amend the clause in the Note requiring the Company to pay additional interest on the Note equal to the greater of $400,000 or an amount equal to 2,200,000 times the average of the five highest closing prices for the Company’s common stock from February 12, 2009 to the maturity date of the Note. The additional interest will, however, not exceed $2,200,000. Prior to the amendment this payment was based upon the average of the 10 daily closing prices immediately preceding the date of payment and had no upper limit.

The Company evaluated the Amendment No. 7 modification under ASC ~~470-50,~~ ~~Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments, (ASC 470-50) to~~470-50to determine if the modification was substantial. The Company determined that because the change in fair value of the debt instruments was greater than 10% of the present value of the cash flows between the modified debt instruments and original debt instruments, the debt modification was substantial and therefore the Company accounted for the modification as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, the Company recorded the new debt instrument at fair value and recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of approximately $1,763,000 during 2010.

F-24

Table of Contents

On October 6, 2010, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Lender whereby the Company agreed to pay the Lender the sum of $4,703,465 (consisting of outstanding principal, interest, amounts due under the terms of the Additional Financing Obligation and legal fees) in three payments to be made in the amount of $1,567,821 due on or before October 8, 2010; $1,567,822 due on or before November 30, 2010; and a third and final payment of $1,567,822 due on or before December 30, 2010. Interest ~~will continue~~continued to accrue at a rate of 18% per annum on the outstanding indebtedness until the date of payment. The Lender ~~retains~~retained a first priority security interest in the assets of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Note. The Company made the scheduled installment payments in accordance with the Agreement with the final payment being made on December 8, 2010.

6% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes

On October 5, 2010, the Company entered into a new, two year unsecured convertible 6% note (“Convertible Note No. 1”) in the amount of $2,000,000 purchased by an existing shareholder. Convertible Note No. 1 is convertible into common shares at $0.50 per share. In conjunction with the issuance of the Convertible Note No. 1, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50.

The Company recorded Convertible Note No. 1 net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to the warrants of approximately $408,000. The Company utilized the services of an independent valuation firm, Vantage Point Advisors, Inc., to perform the Monte-Carlo simulations used to arrive at the estimate of fair value. The convertible notes also contained a beneficial conversion feature, which resulted in an additional debt discount of $408,000. The beneficial conversion amount was measured using the accounting intrinsic value, i.e. the excess of the aggregate fair value of the common stock into which the debt is convertible over the proceeds allocated to the security. The Company will accrete the note discount and beneficial conversion feature over the life of the note using the effective interest rate method.

On November 5, 2010, the Company entered into a new, two year unsecured convertible 6% note (“Convertible Note No. 2”) in the amount of $2,000,000 purchased by the same shareholder. Convertible Note No. 2 is convertible into common shares at $0.50 per share. In conjunction with the issuance of Convertible Note No. 2, the Company issued warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50.

~~F-26~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company recorded Convertible Note No. 2 net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to the warrants of approximately $2,000,000. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants to be approximately $2,074,000 using a Monte-Carlo simulation performed by an independent ~~third party,~~valuation firm, Vantage Point Advisors, Inc. The Company also recorded an additional $74,000 in November 2010 in financing expense based on the fair value of the warrants as the grant date fair value of the warrants exceeded the face amount of the convertible note. The Company will accrete the note discount over the life of the note using the effective interest rate method.

On December 8, 2010, the Company entered into a new, two year unsecured convertible 6% note (“Convertible Note No. 3”) in the amount of $1,500,000 purchased by the same shareholder. Convertible Note No. 3 is convertible into common shares at $0.50 per share. In conjunction with the issuance of Convertible Note No. 3, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,250,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.50.

The Company recorded Convertible Note No. 3 net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to the warrants of approximately $830,000. The Company utilized the services of an independent valuation firm, Vantage Point Advisors, Inc., to perform the Monte-Carlo simulations used to arrive at the estimate of fair value. The convertible notes also contained a beneficial conversion feature, which resulted in an additional debt discount of $671,000. The beneficial conversion amount was measured using the accounting intrinsic value, i.e. the excess of the aggregate fair value of the common stock into which the debt is convertible over the proceeds allocated to the security. The Company will accrete the note discount and beneficial conversion feature over the life of the note using the effective interest rate method.

On December 8, 2010, the Company entered into a security agreement with the Lender of Convertible Notes Nos. 1 through 3 (collectively the “6% Convertible Notes”) whereby the Company granted the 6% Convertible Note holder a first priority lien on and security interest in all the assets of the Company.

F-25

Table of Contents

In June 2011, the Company entered into a new, two year secured convertible 6% note (“Convertible Note No. 4”) in the amount of $500,000 purchased by the existing holder of the 6% Convertible Notes. Convertible Note No. 4 is convertible into common shares at $1.25 per share and is due June 9, 2013. In conjunction with the issuance of Convertible Note No. 4, the Company issued warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.25. The Warrant terminates, if not previously exercised, two years from the date of issuance, or June 9, 2013. The Warrant contains a cashless exercise provision allowing the Lender to exercise the Warrant without tendering the exercise price of the Warrant, subject to a reduction of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant.

The Company recorded Convertible Note No. 4 net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to the warrants of approximately $188,000. The Company utilized the services of an independent valuation firm, Vantage Point Advisors, Inc., to perform the Monte-Carlo simulations used to arrive at the estimate of fair value. The convertible notes also contained a beneficial conversion feature, which resulted in an additional debt discount of $188,000. The beneficial conversion amount was measured using the accounting intrinsic value, i.e. the excess of the aggregate fair value of the common stock into which the debt is convertible over the proceeds allocated to the security. The Company will accrete the note discount and beneficial conversion feature over the life of the note using the effective interest rate method.

In December 2011, the Company repaid a portion of the outstanding 6% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes and converted the rest into shares of the Company’s common stock in accordance with the stated conversion terms. Specifically, $1,500,000 in principal outstanding was repaid using cash proceeds from the Qualified Financing and the remaining $4,500,000 in principal was converted into 9,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The entire accrued interest balance of approximately $387,000 was also converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share resulting in the issuance of another 774,559 shares of common stock. As of the date of the Qualified Financing, the Company had an unamortized debt discount and beneficial conversion feature of approximately $2.3 million which was reversed and recorded as interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. Additionally, in December 2011, as part of the Qualified Financing, the Company modified certain outstanding warrants so that the anti-dilution provisions associated with those warrants would no longer qualify as derivative liabilities (see Note 11). As of December 31, 2011, there was no longer any debt or accrued interest outstanding related to the 6% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes.

7% Convertible Promissory Notes to Related Parties

On November 14, 2008, the Company entered into a series of convertible promissory notes (the "Related-Party Convertible Notes"), aggregating $110,000 with certain officers and members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Related-Party Convertible Notes bear interest at 7.0% per annum and were due February 14, 2009. The principal amount of the Related-Party Convertible Notes plus accrued but unpaid interest is convertible at the option of the holder into common stock of the Company. The number of shares into which the Related-Party Convertible Notes are convertible shall be calculated by dividing the outstanding principal and accrued but unpaid interest by $0.55 (the “Conversion Price”).

In conjunction with the issuance of the Related-Party Convertible Notes, the Company issued an aggregate of 149,996 warrants to the note holders to purchase common stock of the Company. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.55 per share and may be exercised at any time from November 14, 2008 until November 14, 2013.

The Company, in 2008, initially recorded the convertible notes net of a discount equal to the fair value allocated to the warrants of approximately $13,000. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: term of 5 years, a risk free interest rate of 2.53%, a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility of 96%. The convertible notes also contained a beneficial conversion feature, which resulted in an additional debt discount of $12,000. The beneficial conversion amount was measured using the accounting intrinsic value, i.e. the excess of the aggregate fair value of the common stock into which the debt is convertible over the proceeds allocated to the security. The Company has accreted the beneficial conversion feature over the life of the note.

F-26

Table of Contents

The Company did not repay the Related-Party Convertible Notes on the due date. In August 2009, the Company received from the Related-Party Convertible Note holders a waiver of default and extension to January 31, 2010 of the maturity date of the Related-Party Convertible Notes. As consideration for the waiver and note extension, the Company issued to the Related-Party Convertible Note holders an aggregate of 150,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.54 per share and expire on August 25, 2014.

The Company did not repay the notes on January 31, 2010 and is currently seeking an additional waiver of default from the holders of the Related-Party Convertible Notes.

6% Unsecured Short-Term Promissory Notes

During October, November and December of 2011, the Company entered into a series of new unsecured short-term notes aggregating $750,000 with the existing holder of the 6% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes. The notes bear interest at 6% per annum and were issued with an original maturity date of February 13, 2012. As part of the Qualified Financing that took place in December 2011, those notes were settled through the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50. Those warrants expire five years from the date of issuance.

The following ~~table sets~~tables set forth the various components of interest expense, amortization of debt discounts and beneficial conversion features, changes in fair value of the additional financing obligation and losses recorded on debt modification for the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009:~~2010:

	Year Ended December 31, 2011								Year Ended December 31, 2010
	7% Convertible Notes		9% Secured Debt		6% Secured Convertible Notes		Totals		7% Convertible Notes		9% Secured Debt			6% Secured Convertible Notes		Totals
($ in Thousands)
Coupon interest rate	$	8	$	5	$	335	$	348	$	9	$	314		$	47	$	370

Accretion of note discount	$	-	$	-	$	3,250	$	3,250	$	-	$	431		$	175	$	606

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature	$	-	$	-	$	1,198	$	1,198	$	-	$	-		$	68	$	68

Accretion of Additional Financing Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	144		$	-	$	144

Change in Fair Value of Additional Financing Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(695	)	$	-	$	(695)

Loss on loan modifications	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,100		$	-	$	1,100

Total of expense recorded on debt instruments	$	8	$	5	$	4,783	$	4,796	$	9	$	1,294		$	290	$	1,593

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Year Ended December 31, 2009
7% Convertible Notes
9%
Secured Debt
6% Secured Convertible Notes Totals 7% Convertible Notes
9%
Secured Debt
6% Secured Convertible Notes Totals
($ in Thousands)
Coupon interest rate $ 9 $ 314 $ 47 $ 370 $ 9 $ 106 $ - $ 115

Accretion of note discount $ - $ 431 $ 175 $ 606 $ 6 $ 351 $ - $ 357

Accretion of beneficial conversion feature $ - $ - $ 68 $ 68 $ 6 $ - $ - $ 6

Accretion of Additional Financing Obligation $ - $ 144 $ - $ 144 $ - $ 256 $ - $ 256

FV of warrants issued for 7% convertible note default $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 52 $ - $ - $ 52

Amortization of deferred financing fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26 $ - $ 26

Change in Fair Value of Additional Financing Obligation $ - $ (695 ) $ - $ (695 ) $ - $ 1,079 $ - $ 1,079

Loss on loan modifications $ - $ 1,100 $ - $ 1,100 $ - $ 750 $ - $ 750

Total of expense recorded on debt instruments $ 9 $ 1,294 $ 290 $ 1,593 $ 73 $ 2,568 $ - $ 2,641

F-27

Table of Contents

11. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

~~In June 2008, FASB ratified guidance included in~~The Company accounts for its derivative instruments under the provisions of ASC 815, ~~Derivatives~~“Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own ~~Equity-Scoped~~Equity-Scope and Scope Exceptions ("ASC 815"), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts. The guidance, which was effective January 1, 2009, provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. ASC 815 indicates that “contracts issued or held by that reporting entity that are both (1) indexed to its own stock and (2) classified in stockholders’ equity in its statement of financial position” should not be considered derivative instruments (“Topic 815 Scope Exception”)Exceptions”.

Prior to the implementation of ASC 815, the embedded conversion feature of the Company’s Series C and Series D Preferred Stocks and stock purchase warrants were classified as permanent equity because they met the Topic 815 Scope Exception and all of the criteria in the FASB guidance covering the accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own stock. However, both the Series C and Series D convertible preferred stock conversion feature and the conversion features contained in certain warrants contain settlement provisions such that if the Company makes certain equity offerings in the future at a price lower than the conversion prices of the instruments, the conversion ratio would be adjusted.

ASC 815 provides that an instrument’s strike price or the number of shares used to calculate the settlement amount are not fixed if its terms provide for any potential adjustment, regardless of the probability of such adjustment(s) or whether such adjustments are in the entity’s control. If the instruments strike price or the number of shares used to calculate the settlement are not fixed, the instrument (or embedded feature) would still be considered indexed to an entity’s own stock if the only variables that could affect the settlement amount would be inputs to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” forward or option on equity shares. Both the warrants and preferred stocks contain a price protection provision (or anti-dilution provision) that reduces the warrant strike price or preferred conversion rate in the event the Company issues additional shares at a more favorable price than the strike price.

Under the provisions of ASC 815, the embedded conversion feature in the Company’s Series C and Series D Preferred Stock and the anti-dilution and cash settlement provisions in certain warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s stock because future equity offerings of the Company’s stock are not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option on equity shares. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2009, the Company is required to account for the embedded derivatives related to the conversion feature in its Series C and Series D Preferred Stocks and certain warrants as derivative liabilities (collectively the “Derivative Liabilities”)~~. In accordance with ASC 815, the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle is recognized~~ qualify as an adjustment to the opening balance of the Company’s equity on January 1, 2009. The cumulative effect adjustment is based on amounts that would have been recognized if the guidance in ASC 815 had been applied from the date the preferred stock and warrants were issued.derivative instruments.

The Company is required to ~~mark to market~~mark-to-market, at the end of each reporting period, the value of the ~~derivative liabilities.~~Derivative Liabilities. The Company revalues these ~~derivative liabilities~~Derivative Liabilities at the end of each reporting period by using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The periodic change in value of the ~~derivative liabilities~~Derivative Liabilities is recorded as either non-cash derivative income (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants decrease) or as non-cash derivative expense (if the value of the embedded derivative and warrants increase). Although the values of the embedded derivative and warrants are affected by interest rates, the remaining contractual conversion period and the Company’s stock volatility, the primary cause of the change in the values of the ~~derivative liabilities~~Derivative Liabilities will be the value of the Company’s common stock. If the stock price goes up, the value of these derivatives will generally increase and if the stock price goes down the value of these derivatives will generally decrease.

The Company uses a Monte-Carlo simulation methodology and the Black Scholes option pricing model in the determination of the fair value of the Derivative Liabilities. The Monte-Carlo simulation methodology is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility over the term of the Derivative Liabilities and assumptions regarding future financings. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock prices as well as assumptions regarding the expected stock price volatility of the term of the derivative liabilities in addition to interest rates and dividend yields.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company ~~utilized~~had approximately 18,547,500 outstanding warrants to purchase shares of the ~~services~~Company’s common stock that qualified for derivative liability treatment. The recorded fair market value of ~~an independent valuation firm, Vantage Point Advisors, Inc., to perform~~those warrants was approximately $11,824,000 which is reflected as a non-current liability in the ~~Monte-Carlo simulations~~consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

Series C and D Preferred Stock Embedded Conversion Feature

The Series C and Series D convertible preferred stock conversion feature contains settlement provisions such that if the Company makes certain equity offerings in the future at a price lower than the conversion prices, the conversion ratio would be adjusted. ASC 815 provides that the number of shares used to ~~arrive~~calculate the settlement amount is not fixed if its terms provide for any potential adjustment, regardless of the probability of such adjustment(s) or whether such adjustments are in the entity’s control. If the number of shares used to calculate the settlement is not fixed, the instrument (or embedded feature) would still be considered indexed to an entity’s own stock if the only variables that could affect the settlement amount would be inputs to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” forward or option on equity shares. The preferred stock contains a price protection provision (or anti-dilution provision) that reduces the preferred conversion rate in the event the Company issues additional shares at a more favorable price than the ~~estimate~~conversion price.

Under the provisions of ASC 815, the embedded conversion feature in the Company’s Series C and Series D Preferred Stock are not considered indexed to the Company’s stock because future equity offerings of the Company’s stock are not an input to the fair ~~value.~~value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option on equity shares. Accordingly the Company is required to account for the embedded derivatives related to the conversion feature in its Series C and Series D Preferred Stocks as derivative liabilities.

In December 2011, the Company converted all of its outstanding Series C and Series D Preferred Stock into Common Stock. Specifically, 2,200 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, 2,085 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and the combined accrued dividends of approximately $1,599,000 were collectively converted into 11,768,525 shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result of that conversion, the derivative liability related to the embedded conversion feature on the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock was eliminated. The Company marked the derivative liability to its calculated market value of approximately $3,840,000 immediately prior to the conversion resulting in a gain of approximately $1,678,000 that related to the change in market value of the derivative liability from the date of the last revaluation, September 30, 2011, to the date of the Qualified Financing. That liability balance of approximately $3,840,000 was then reclassified to additional paid-in capital as a result of the conversion.

F-28

Table of Contents

Common Stock Warrants with Anti-Dilution Provisions

~~During~~Certain warrants to purchase the ~~year ended December 31, 2009,~~Company’s common stock contain settlement provisions such that if the Company ~~issued 6,560,000 warrants requiring derivative liability classification with~~makes certain equity offerings in the future at a ~~grant date~~price lower than the warrant strike price, the strike price would be adjusted down. ASC 815 provides that an instrument’s strike price is not fixed if its terms provide for any potential adjustment, regardless of the probability of such adjustment(s) or whether such adjustments are in the entity’s control. If the instruments strike price is not fixed, the instrument (or embedded feature) would still be considered indexed to an entity’s own stock if the only variables that could affect the settlement amount would be inputs to the fair value of ~~approximately $1,148,000.~~ a “fixed-for-fixed” forward or option on equity shares. The warrants contain a price protection provision (or anti-dilution provision) that reduces the warrant strike price in the event the Company issues additional shares at a more favorable price than the strike price.

Under the provisions of ASC 815, the anti-dilution provisions in these warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s stock because future equity offerings of the Company’s stock are not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option on equity shares. Accordingly, the Company is required to account for these warrants as derivative liabilities.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 8,250,000 additional warrants which contained anti-dilution provisions requiring derivative liability ~~classification with~~classification. Those warrants had a grant date fair value of approximately ~~$3,312,000.~~$3,312,000 as determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation methodology.

In December 2011, as part of the Qualified Financing, the Company modified certain outstanding warrants so that the anti-dilution provisions associated with those warrants would no longer qualify as derivative liabilities. Immediately prior to the date of the Qualified Financing, there were approximately 13,871,000 warrants outstanding that qualified for derivative liability treatment. The modification that took place, as part of the Qualified Financing, resulted in approximately 7,576,000 of those warrants losing the conditions that required derivative liability treatment. As a result, the Company recorded a gain of approximately $1,127,000 that related to the change in market value of the derivative liability from the date of the last revaluation, September 30, 2011, to the date of the Qualified Financing. The resulting fair market value for the derivative liability as of the date of the Qualified Financing, of approximately $1,832,000, was then reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

Common Stock Warrants with Cash Settlement Provisions

During the year ended December 31, 2011, as part of the Qualified Financing, the Company issued 12,252,500 warrants containing certain cash settlement provisions which would require cash payments to the warrant holders, as determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, in the event of a “fundamental transaction” as defined within the warrant agreement(s). As these warrants have the ability to be settled in cash payments and that triggering events requiring that treatment are largely out of the Company’s control, the warrants require derivative liability classification. Accordingly, the Company recorded approximately $5,626,000 in derivative liability based on the grant date fair value of the warrants as determined by the Black Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The Company has determined that the best measure of expected volatility is based on the historical weekly volatility of the Company’s common stock. The historical volatility factor utilized in the Company’s Black-Scholes computation was 119%. The interest rate used is the risk free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term. The interest rate used in the Company’s Black-Scholes calculations was 2.6%. Dividend yield is zero as the Company does not expect to declare any dividends on the Company’s common shares in the foreseeable future.

12. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, (ASC 740). Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences related to temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary based on the weight of available evidence, if it is considered more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company has established a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of such asset.

F-29

Table of Contents

ASC 740-10 requires a company to first determine whether it is more-likely-than-not (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets this more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured and recognized at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing authority.

The Company’s uncertain position relative to unrecognized tax benefits and any potential increase in these liabilities relates primarily to the allocations of revenue and costs among ~~our~~the Company’s global operations and the impact of tax rulings made during the period affecting ~~our~~its tax positions. ~~Our~~The Company’s existing tax position could result in liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $49,000 and ~~2009 was~~ $33,000, ~~and $0,~~ respectively.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company underwent an examination by the Canadian Revenue Agency (“CRA”) for the 2001 to 2008 tax years. In June 2010, the Company was notified that the CRA proposed certain significant adjustments to the Company’s transfer pricing tax position for the years 2001 through 2008. Management evaluated these proposed adjustments and in July 2010 filed a formal notice of appeal. In 2011, the Company was notified that certain significant portions of the Company’s appeal had been accepted by the CRA. ~~As a result of appeal, the Company has recorded a tax provision of approximately $126,000 and $0 for the years ended 2010 and 2009, respectively.~~

Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain tax positions and determining the Company’s provision for income taxes. No assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in the Company’s historical income tax provisions and accruals. The Company adjusts these items in light of changing facts and circumstances. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.

~~F-29~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The significant components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows:

($ in thousands)	Year Ended December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2011		2010
Current
Federal	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
State		—		—		—		—
Foreign		126		—		(19)		126

Deferred
Federal		—		—		—		—
State		—		—		—		—
Foreign		—		—		—		—

	$	126	$	—	$	(19)	$	126

Delaware		33-0224167
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 310, San Diego, CA		92127
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	o	Smaller Reporting Company	x

			Page

PART I
Item 1.		Business	31
Item 1A.		Risk Factors	1612
Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments	2318
Item 2.		Properties	2318
Item 3.		Legal Proceedings	2318
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	2318

PART II
Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	19
Item 6.	24	Selected Financial Data	20
Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2520
Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6336
Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	6336
Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	6336
Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures	6336
Item 9B.		Other Information	6437

PART III
Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	6538
Item 11.		Executive Compensation	6941
Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	7548
Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	7850
Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services	7951

PART IV
Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	8052

SIGNATURES			84
			53
EXHIBIT INDEX			~~F-43~~

	●	~~a derivative liability has been recorded as of January 1, 2009 through a charge to Accumulated Deficit for the effect of the cumulative adjustment of the fair value of the derivatives as of that date;~~
	●	~~the fair value of derivatives as of March 31, 2009 has been amended to reflect a non-cash charge to expense; and~~

2009 Fiscal Quarters	High		Low
First Quarter	$	0.30	$	0.14
Second Quarter	$	0.69	$	0.20
Third Quarter	$	0.95	$	0.45
Fourth Quarter	$	0.88	$	0.60

	Years Ended December 31,
Net Product Revenue	2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	2,126		$	1,882		$	244		13	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		82	%		59	%
Hardware and consumables	$	199		$	381		$	(182	)	(48	)%
Percentage of total net product revenue		8	%		12	%
Services	$	271		$	929		$	(658	)	(71	)%
Percentage of total net product revenue		10	%		29	%
Total net product revenue	$	2,596		$	3,192		$	(596	)	(19	)%

	Years Ended December 31,
Net Product Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	1,882		$	2,307		$	(425)	(18)	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		59	%		67	%
Hardware and consumables	$	381		$	230		$	151	66	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		12	%		7	%
Services	$	929		$	893		$	36	4	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		29	%		26	%
Total net product revenues	$	3,192		$	3,430		$	(238)	(7)	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Net Maintenance Revenues	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Maintenance Revenues	$	2,619	$	2,599	$	20		1	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Net Maintenance Revenue	2011		2010		$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Maintenance Revenue	$	2,878	$	2,619	$	259		10	%

	Years Ended December 31,											Years Ended December 31,
Cost of Product Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
Cost of Product Revenue												2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	266		$	310		$	(44)		(14)	%	$	143		$	266		$	(123	)		(46	)%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue		14	%		13	%							7	%		14	%
Hardware and consumables	$	289		$	228		$	61		27	%	$	151		$	289		$	(138	)		(48	)%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue		76	%		99	%							76	%		76	%
Services	$	504		$	627		$	(123)		(20)	%	$	165		$	504		$	(339	)		(67	)%
Percentage of services product revenue		54	%		70	%							61	%		54	%
Total cost of product revenues	$	1,059		$	1,165		$	(106)		(9)	%	$	459		$	1,059		$	(600	)		(57	)%
Percentage of total product revenues		33	%		34	%
Percentage of total product revenue													18	%		33	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Cost of Maintenance Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Total maintenance cost of revenues	$	938		$	814		$	124		15	%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues		36	%		31	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Cost of Maintenance Revenue	2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Total maintenance cost of revenue	$	935		$	938		$	(3	)		(0	)%
Percentage of total maintenance revenue		32	%		36	%

	Years Ended December 31,											Years Ended December 31,
Product Gross Profit	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change			2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Software and royalties	$	1,616		$	1,997		$	(381)		(19)	%	$	1,983		$	1,616		$	367			23	%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue		86	%		87	%							93	%		86	%
Hardware and consumables	$	92		$	2		$	90		4,500	%	$	48		$	92		$	(44	)		(48	)%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue		24	%		1	%							24	%		24	%
Services	$	425		$	266		$	159		60	%	$	106		$	425		$	(319	)		(75	)%
Percentage of services product revenue		46	%		30	%							39	%		46	%
Total product gross profit	$	2,133		$	2,265		$	(132)		(6)	%	$	2,137		$	2,133		$	4			0	%
Percentage of total product revenues		67	%		66	%
Percentage of total product revenue													82	%		67	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Maintenance Gross Profit	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Total maintenance gross profit	$	1,681		$	1,785		$	(104)		(6)	%
Percentage of total maintenance revenues		64	%		69	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Operating Expenses	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

General and administrative	$	2,546		$	2,433		$	113		5	%
Percentage of total net revenue		44	%		40	%
Sales and marketing	$	1,528		$	1,705		$	(177)		(10)	%
Percentage of total net revenue		26	%		28	%
Research and development	$	2,531		$	2,367		$	164		7	%
Percentage of total net revenue		44	%		39	%
Depreciation and amortization	$	50		$	98		$	(48)		(49)	%
Percentage of total net revenue		1	%		2	%

	Years Ended December 31,
Operating Expense	2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)

General and administrative	$	2,327		$	2,546		$	(219	)		(9	)%
Percentage of total net revenue		43	%		44	%
Sales and marketing	$	1,404		$	1,528		$	(124	)		(8	)%
Percentage of total net revenue		26	%		26	%
Research and development	$	2,664		$	2,531		$	133			5	%
Percentage of total net revenue		49	%		44	%
Depreciation and amortization	$	28		$	50		$	(22	)		(44	)%
Percentage of total net revenue		1	%		1	%

	Quarter Ended
	March 31			June 30			Sept. 30			March 31			June 30			Sept. 30
	2009			2009			2009			2010			2010			2010
Revenues:
Product	$	675		$	999		$	241		$	1,360		$	511		$	769
Maintenance		638			646			659			668			640			653
		1,313			1,645			900			2,028			1,151			1,422
Cost of revenues:
Product		284			317			167			528			144			249
Maintenance		209			199			201			247			254			198

Gross profit		820			1,129			532			1,253			753			975

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		609			595			555			697			680			512
Sales and marketing		429			451			376			392			381			385
Research and development		587			553			582			697			666			576
Depreciation and amortization		33			30			19			14			12			13
		1,658			1,629			1,532			1,800			1,739			1,486

Loss from operations		(838	)		(500	)		(1,000	)		(547	)		(986	)		(511	)

Interest expense, net		102			180			212			242			334			60
Change in fair value of financing obligation		152			450			438			229			(744	)		(38	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(748	)		5,179			756			477			(4,154	)		(506	)
Loss on debt modification		-			750			-			-			-			1,100
Financing expense		-			-			1,371			-			-			-
Other income, net		(11	)		(11	)		(124	)		(17	)		(284	)		(12	)

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes		(333	)		(7,048	)		(3,653	)		(1,478	)		3,862			(1,115	)

Income tax expense		-			-			-			-			197			2
Income (loss) from operations		(333	)		(7,048	)		(3,653	)		(1,478	)		3,665			(1,117	)

Net income (loss)	$	(333	)	$	(7,048	)	$	(3,653	)	$	(1,478	)	$	3,665		$	(1,117	)
Preferred dividends		(99	)		(100	)		(101	)		(99			(98	)		(99	)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(432	)	$	(7,148	)	$	(3,754	)	$	(1,577	)	$	3,567		$	(1,216	)

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share - see note 2
Income (loss) from operations	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.39	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.07	)	$	0.16		$	(0.05	)
Preferred dividends		-			(0.01	)		(0.01	)		-			-			-
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common shareavailable to common shareholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.07	)	$	0.16	(1)	$	(0.05	)

	As Previously							As
($ in thousands)	Reported			Adjustments				Restated
Total assets	$	5,340		$	-			$	5,340

Total current liabilities	$	5,111		$	-			$	5,111

Secured note payable, net of discount		485			(321	)	(2)		316
					119		(5)
					33		(4)

Additional financing obligation, net of discount		440			(119	)	(5)		321
Derivative liabilities		-			4,127		(1)		3,941
					562		(2)
					(748	)	(3)
Pension obligation		1,073			-				1,073

Total liabilities		7,109			3,653				10,762

Stockholders' equity

Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock		2			-				2
Series C convertible non-redeemable preferred stock		-			-				-
Series D convertible non-redeemable preferred stock		-			-				-

Common stock		180			-				180

Additional paid in capital		86,316			(5,836	)	(1)		80,239
					(241	)	(2)
Treasury Stock		(64	)						(64	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		46							46

Accumulated deficit		(88,249	)		748		(3)		(85,824	)
					(33	)	(4)
					1,709		(1)
Total Shareholders' deficit		(1,769	)		(3,653	)			(5,422	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit	$	5,340		$	-			$	5,340

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Net Product Revenues	2010			2009		$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	827		$	390		$	437	112	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		61	%		58	%
Hardware and consumables	$	224		$	60		$	164	273	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		16	%		9	%
Services	$	309		$	225		$	84	37	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		23	%		33	%
Total net product revenues	$	1,360		$	6755		$	685	101	%

	Three Months Ended June 30,
Net Product Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	319		$	785		$	(466)		(59)	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		62	%		79	%
Hardware and consumables	$	98		$	25		$	73		292	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		19	%		3	%
Services	$	94		$	189		$	(95)		(50)	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		18	%		19	%
Total net product revenues	$	511		$	999		$	(488)		(49)	%

	Three Months Ended June 30,
Cost of Product Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	39		$	120		$	(81)		(68)	%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue		12	%		15	%
Hardware and consumables	$	48		$	26		$	22		85	%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue		49	%		104	%
Services	$	57		$	171		$	(114)		(67)	%
Percentage of services product revenue		61	%		90	%
Total cost of product revenues	$	144		$	317		$	(173)		(55)	%
Percentage of total product revenues		28	%		32	%

	Three Months Ended September 30,
Net Product Revenues	2010			2009			$ Change		% Change
(dollars in thousands)

Software and royalties	$	370		$	216		$	154		71	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		48	%		90	%
Hardware and consumables	$	21		$	37		$	(16)		(43)	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		3	%		15	%
Services	$	378		$	(12	)	$	390		3,250	%
Percentage of total net product revenue		49	%		(5	)%
Total net product revenues	$	769		$	241		$	528		219	%

(5)	Represents the quarterly vesting of 12,000 restricted shares granted on January 11, 2010. The restricted shares vest quarterly over three years ending January 11, 2013. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a proposal that certain members of management and board members holding stock options be offered restricted stock awards in exchange for the cancellation of the stock options they held with strike prices of $1.45 or more. The restricted stock awards were offered on a 3 for 5 basis (for each 5 stock options surrendered, 3 shares of restricted stock are granted). The shares of restricted stock vest over three years on a quarterly basis with the participant to receive 1/12 of the shares on each three-month anniversary of the date of grant. As the fair value of the stock options exchanged exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued, no incremental compensation expense is incurred for the restricted shares.
(6)	Represents the quarterly vesting of 28,200 restricted shares granted on January 11, 2010. The restricted shares vest quarterly over three years ending January 11, 2013. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a proposal that certain members of management and board members holding stock options be offered restricted stock awards in exchange for the cancellation of the stock options they held with strike prices of $1.45 or more. The restricted stock awards were offered on a 3 for 5 basis (for each 5 stock options surrendered, 3 shares of restricted stock are granted). The shares of restricted stock vest over three years on a quarterly basis with the participant to receive 1/12 of the shares on each three-month anniversary of the date of grant. As the fair value of the stock options exchanged exceeded the fair value of the restricted shares issued, no incremental compensation expense is incurred for the restricted shares.
(7)	Mr. Cronin joined the Board of Directors in February 2012.
(8)	The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, in accordance with the provisions of ~~SFAS 123R~~ASC 718 and thus may include amounts from awards granted prior to 2011 and 2010. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Name and Address	Number of Shares (1)	Percent of Class (2)

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

S. James Miller, Jr. (3)	1,185,636		1.7	%
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

John Callan (4)	86,146		0	%
Director

David Carey (5)	42,625		0	%
Director

G. Steve Hamm (6)	78,607		0	%
Director

David Loesch (7)	104,731		0	%
Director

Wayne Wetherell (8)	431,200		0	%
SVP of Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary

Charles AuBuchon (9)	499,491		0	%
VP of Business Development

David Harding (10)	214,999		0	%
Chief Technical Officer

Total beneficial ownership of directors and officers as a group (8 persons):	2,643,435		3.8	%

5% Stockholders:

Gruber & McBaine Capital Management LLC 50	9,975,599		14.5	%
Osgood Place San Francisco, CA (11)

Bruce Toll (12)	8,495,529		11.6	%

Neal I. Goldman (13)	32,460,145		41.1	%

Name and Address	Number of Shares (1)	Percent of Class (2)

Directors and Named Executive Officers:
S. James Miller, Jr. (3)	1,112,765		1.6	%
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

John Callan (4)	85,521		0	%*
Director

David Carey (5)	42,000		0	%*
Director

G. Steve Hamm (6)	77, 516		0	%*
Director

David Loesch (7)	103, 848		0	%*
Director

Wayne Wetherell (8)	426,200		0	%*
SVP of Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary

Charles AuBuchon (9)	537, 754		0	%*
VP of Business Development

David Harding (10)	208,332		0	%*
Chief Technical Officer

Total beneficial ownership of directors and officers as a group (8 persons):	2,602,514		3.8	%

5% Stockholders:

Gruber & McBaine Capital Management LLC 50	11,935,517		17.5	%
Osgood Place San Francisco, CA (11)

Bruce Toll (12)	8,539,851		11.6	%

Goldman Capital (13)	32,460,145		41.5	%

(1)	All entries exclude beneficial ownership of shares issuable pursuant to options that have not vested or that are not otherwise exercisable as of the date hereof or which will not become vested or exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012.

(2)	Percentages are rounded to nearest one-tenth of one percent. Percentages are based on ~~67,124,357~~67,988,916 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 1, 2012. Options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the January 1, 2012 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the stockholder holding the options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that stockholder, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of any other stockholder.
(3)	Includes 75,201 shares held jointly with spouse and ~~222,000~~312,250 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012. Also includes 122,727 warrants and notes convertible into ~~100,695~~83,315 shares of common stock.


(4)	Includes of ~~10,000~~10,625 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012.

(5)	Includes of ~~10,000~~10,625 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012.

(6)	Includes of ~~11,668~~12,501 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012. Also includes 27,271 warrants and notes convertible into ~~22,377~~22,635 shares of common stock.

(7)	Includes of ~~10,000~~10,625 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012. Also includes 27,271 warrants and notes convertible into ~~22,377~~22,635 shares of common stock.

(8)	Includes ~~100,000~~105,000 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012.

(9)	Includes ~~128,332~~134,999 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012. Also includes 122,727 warrants and notes convertible into ~~100,695~~55,765 shares of common stock.

(10)	Includes ~~103,332~~109,999 options exercisable within 60 days of ~~January 1,~~March 15, 2012.

(11)	Includes 922,438 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Patrick McBaine exercises sole voting and dispositive power over all reported shares.

(12)	Includes 5,400,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(13)	Includes 11,025,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Mr. Goldman exercises sole voting and dispositive power over ~~all~~29,395,085 shares, and shared voting and dispositive power over 9,095,060 reported ~~shares.~~shares, of which 3,065,060 shares are owned by Goldman Capital Management, Inc., 6,000,000 shares are owed by Goldman Partners, LP and 30,000 shares are owed by The Neal and Marlene Goldman Foundation.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)
	(a)		(b)		(c)		(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
1999 Stock Award Plan amended and restated as of June 7, 2005		1,413,574	$	0.64		391,850
1999 Stock Award Plan amended and restated as of October 5, 2011								1,679,213	$	0.73		2,316,445

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
2001 Equity Incentive Plan		49,721	$	2.68				28,500	$	2.41		—

Total		1,463,295	$	0.71		391,850		1,707,713	$	0.76		2,316,445

Potential Dilutive Securities:	Number of Common Shares Convertible into at December 31, 2010		Number of Common Shares Convertible into at December 31, 2009
Convertible notes payable		10,700,109		215,803
Convertible preferred stock – Series B		54,784		51,153
Convertible preferred stock – Series C		5,854,290		5,502,290
Convertible preferred stock – Series D		5,249,296		5,192,618
Stock options		1,463,295		2,300,038
Restricted stock grants		360,000		360,000
Warrants		19,737,612		14,448,253
Total Potential Dilutive Securities		43,419,386		28,070,155

	Fair Value at December 31, 2009
($ in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets:
Pension assets	$	1,349	$	1,349	$	—	$	—
Totals	$	1,349	$	1,349	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Additional financing obligation	$	1,504	$	—	$	—	$	1,504
Derivative liabilities	$	11,603	$	—	$	—	$	11,603
Totals	$	13,107	$	—	$	—	$	13,107

($ in thousands)	December 31, 2010		December 31, 2009		December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010

Compensated absences	$	245	$	224	$	256	$	245
Wages and sales commissions		117		114		84		117
Customer deposits		199		50		240		199
Liquidated damages		165		418		182		165
Royalties		251		251		251		251
Professional fees		14		23
Board of directors fees		376		216		527		376
Income Taxes		163		36
Income and sales taxes						186		163
Interest and dividends		121		169		82		121
Other		171		171		197		185
		1,822	$	1,672	$	2,005	$	1,822

($ in thousands)	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009			December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Secured Promissory Note
9% secured promissory note. Face value of note $0 and $2,325 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Discount on note is $0 and $291 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Note due June 30, 2010.	$	—		$	1,696
9% secured promissory note. Face value of note $0 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Discount on note is $0 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Note settled in December 2010.							$	—		$	—
Total secured notes payable		—			1,696			—			—
Secured Convertible Notes Payable
6% secured convertible notes payable. Face value of notes $5,500 and $0 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Discount on notes is $4,073 and $0 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Notes due October through December of 2012.	$	1,427		$	—
6% secured convertible notes payable. Face value of notes $0 and $5,500 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Discount on notes is $0 and $4,073 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Note settled in December 2011.								—			1,427
Total convertible notes payable	$	1,427		$	—			—			1,427
Notes payable to related parties:
7% convertible promissory notes. Face value of notes $110. Discount on notes at is $0 at December 31, 2010 and 2009 . Notes were due February 14, 2009 and extended to January 31, 2010.	$	110		$	110
7% convertible promissory notes. Face value of notes $110 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Discount on notes is $0 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Notes were due January 2010. The Company is currently seeking a waiver of default.								110			110
Total notes payable to related parties	$	110		$	110			110			110

Total notes payable	$	1,537		$	1,806			110			1,537
Less current portion		(110	)		(1,806	)		(110	)		(110	)
Long-term notes payable	$	1,427		$	—		$	—		$	1,427